MARGARINE FAT BLEND WITH A REDUCED TENDENCY TO SANDINESS AND A PROCESS FOR REDUCING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SANDINESS IN FAT BLENDS

Abstract: A margarine fat blend with a reduced tendency to sandiness and a process for reducing development of sandiness in fat blends. The fat blends consist of an oil rich in linoleic acid and a fat having a level of palmitic acid residues of at least 10%, obtained by interesterification of a fat rich in palmitic acid residues and a hydrogenated oil.

Description: MARGARINP FAT BI,END WITH A REDUCED TENDENCY TO SANDI NESS AND A PROCESS FOR REDUCING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SANDINESS IN FAT BLENDS The present invention relates to a margarine fat blend with a reduced tendency to sandiness. More particularly the invention relates to a margarine fat with a relatively high level of poly-unsaturated fatty acid residues, particularly of the linoleic type, stemming from oils such as sunflower oil, soybeanoil, corn oil, rapeseed oil and the like. Preferred fat components are in general those which have a level of linoleic acid residues of at least 40%. In order to get a fat blend having an adequate consistency, by which term is meant that the amount of crystallized solid fat at a temperature ranging from 10 to 200C should preferably range from 10 to 20%, it is common to hydrogenate at least part of the fat. In order to get a fat blend having. the right melting properties on consumption it is important that the oil is partially hydrogenated, preferably under conditions promoting isomerization e.g. in the presence of a sulphur-poisoned nickel catalyst precipitated on kieselguhr at a temperature ranging from 140"C to 1800C Under these conditions fats are obtained which have a relatively high content of trans-fatty acid res idues. These "trans-fats" are appreciated because they impart a certain coolness to the fat, which means that such fats have a rather steep melting curve within the temperature range of 15-25"C. On the other hand these "trans-fats" sometimes cause sandiness. Sandiness becomes apparent under the microscope in the form of relatively large needles consisting of highmelting fat crystals, the size of which ranges from 10 to 50 microns. Moreover, on consumption these fat crys- tals aive an lnnleasant sensation on the palate. Tiie risk or the development of sandiness and particu- larly the rate of formation of said large crystals can he controlled by processing and storage conditions. It has been proposed in British Patent 1 121 662 to reduce sandiness in a hardened sunflower oil containing fat blend by interesterifyirig a mixture comprising hardened and unhardened sunflower oil. This interesterified mixture constitutes about 60% of the total blend. This relatively high level of the interesterified- com- ponent was deemed essential in order to reduce recrystallisation, which is the cause of sandiness. In later developments it was attempted to lower this high level of the interesterified component while keeping sandiness at a low level. This resulted in fat blends as described in Canadian Patent 1 113 779, which contain 25-508 of an interesterified component obtained from the random interesterification of a low-trans hardened sun-flower oil and non-hardened sunflower oil. In the above patents specifications fat blends are described which have a level of hydrogenated fats higher than 35% and sometimes even higher than 45%, whereby the need for a fat with a high level of linoleic acid is not sufficiently met. Applicants have found fat blends and a process for producing blends having a low risk of developing sandiness and meeting the long felt need for a physiologically beneficial fat, i.e. a fat with a level of linoleic acid residues preferably higher than about 30% with .,ood organoleptic properties. 'Phe process according to the invention in its most general form comprises adding t fats which are prone to sandiness an effective amount of a fat rich in palmitic acid residues and interesterifying the mixture thus obtained. The precise nature of the various components and the process conditions are described further in the specification. The fat blend according to the invention comprises: an oil (a) having a level of linoleic acid residues of at least 20%, a hydrogenated fat (b) having a level of palmitic acid residues of at least 10%, obtained by interesterification of a fat (d) containing an appreciable proportion of palmitic acid residues, with a fat (c) which is prone to sandiness. Oil (a) preferably comprises sunflower oil, safflower oil, soybean oil, corn oil, rapeseed oil or mixtures thereof. Fat (c) preferably comprises an oil (a) which has been hydrogenated to a melting point ranging from 30 to 480C preferably under conditions promoting isomerisation conducive to mono-trans unsaturated acids, e.g. using sulphur-poisoned nickel catalyst at a temperature ranging from 140 to 1800C. An appropriate proportion of this component is used to achieve in the final blend a level cf trans acids preferably ranging from 15 to 30%, ideally from 15 to 20% (measured according to A.O.C.S. Tentative Method Cd 14-61). Fat (d) is preferably selected from palm oil, cottonseed oil, butterfat, tallow fat, herring oil, menhaden sil or mixtures of these fats or fractions thereof, in non-hydrogenated or in hydrogenated form. Fat (d) ha a level of palmitic acid residues preferably ranging from 50 to 90%. Fat (d) preferably consists of a stearin fraction obtained by fractionatiòn of palm oil, preferably In the presence of a solvent and ideally in the presence of acetone at 18-240C using a solvent: oil ratio of 4:1 - 5:L. It is however also possible to produce a stearin fraction by dry-fractionation of palm oil (in the absence of a solvent) or in the presence of an aqueous solution of a surface-active agent such as sodiumlaurylsulphate (so-called tanza fractionation). Fat (a) and fat (c) preferably originate from the same source. Fat (a) preferably consists of sunflower oil and fat (c) preferably consists of sunflower oil hydrogenated to a melting point preferably ranging from 34 to 430C, because of the good melting properties resulting thereof. According to the invention fat (b) can be obtained by first carrying out interesterification of a non-hydrogenated oil with the fat rich in palmitic acid residues and then hydrogenating the interesterified mixture to a melting point ranging from 30 to 480C and preferably from 34 to 43"C, or by first hydrogenating the oil and subsequently conducting the interesterification of the hydrogenated oil with the fat rich in palmitic acid residues. Tnteresterification may involve random interesterification and directed interesterification, which means an interesterification combined with a crystallization of the high melting triglycerides present in the mixture, which can subsequently be filtered off. Preferably, random interesterification is carried out under substantially moisture-free conditions ( 0.01% water) under vacuum, using a classical catalyst such as an alkalimetal alkoxide, an alkali metal such as sodium, or dry sodium hydroxide. Oil (a) is preferably present in a proportion ranging from 30 to 75t, more preferably from 60 to 75%. Oil (a) preferably consists of sunflower oil having a level of linoleic acid residues of 60-70%. The interesterified fat (b) can be present in an amount up to 70%, but preferably within the range of 25 to 40% by weight. In fat (b) the ratio of fat (c) to fat (d) ranges from 20:1 to 5:1, preferably from 14:1 to 7:1.- Fat (d) constitutes 1-15%, preferably 2-8% of the total blend, whereas the remainder of the fat stems from hydrogenated and non-hydrogenated oil (a). The preferred fat blend according to the present invention wi3l contain a level of linoleic acid residues ranging from 30 to 55% and preferably from 40 to 48%. The fat blend according to the invention does not display sandiness on storage at 200C for a period of five weeks or longer. The above description and examples were focussed on fat blends essentially consisting of components (a) and (b) as hereinbefore defined. It goes without say ing that fat blends can be produced which comprise a minor proportion, preferably less than 10%, of an additional fat component which was not subjected to interesterification, such as a hydrogenated oil, e.g. palm kernel oil hydrogenated to a melting point of 38 C. The invention will now be illustrated in the following examples: Example 1 A fat blend was produced starting from 67% of sunflower oil, 33% of a randomly interesterified blend consisting of 91% of sunflower oil hardened to a melting point of 34"C and 9% of acetone-fractionated palm oil stearin. Interesterification was carried out using a catalyst consisting of a 30 wtt dispersion of sodium in oil. A proportion of 0.15 wt%, based on the fat, of this dispersion was used. Interesterification was carried out for half an hour under nitrogen. The reaction was stopped with 2 wt% of water, based on the fat, and soap which had been found was removed by adding 2 wt% of bleaching earth. The mixture was filtered over a hyflo filter aid. Hydrogenation was carried out using 0.3 wt% of a sulphur-poisoned nickel catalyst (5.5 g 5/100 g Ni). Hydrogenation of sunflower oil was carried out in two steps, firstly at 1500C and subsequently at 1800C to achieve a melting point of 34"C. Fractionation of palm oil was carried out using dry acetone at 18-240C. The solvent:fat ratio was 4:1. The level of palmitic acid residues in the interesterified blend was 13.8%. The level of palmitic acid residues in the palm oil stearin obtained by acetone fractionation was 83.6%. The level of trans fatty acids in the total fat blend was about 19.58. The level of linoleic acid residues in the total fat blend was 46.4%. The solid fat content at various temperatures obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance measurements were N10 = 24.7 N20 = 13.1 N30 = 2.7 N35 = 0 The measurements were carried out essentially as described in "Fette, Seifen, Anstrichmittel" 80, 180-186 (1978). A margarine was produced starting from the above fat blend and an aqueous phase containing 16% of water, 0.27% of skim milk powder, 0.58 of starch, 0.3% of sodium chloride and 0.07% of potassium sorbate, pH=4.5. The fat phase (82.86%) contained 82.74 & of the fat blend, 0.05% of a monoglyceride and 0.07% of lecithin. The margarine was produced on a Votator. The product obtained was stored for 9 weeks at 20 C. On consumption no sandiness was perceived. Examination of the product under the microscope did not reveal a substantial amount of needles of crystallized fat, which means that the fat had a low risk of developing sandiness on further storage. Example 2 rhe general procedure of Example 1 was repeated, with the difference that the fat blend consisted of 70t of sunflower oil and 30% of a randomly interesterified blend consisting of 91% of sunflower oil hardened to a melting point of 37"C and 9% of the acetone-fractionated palm oil stearin. The level of palmitic acid residues in the interesterified mixture was 13.4%. The level of trans fatty acids in the total fat blend was about 18.6%. The level of linoleic acid residues in the total fat blend was 47.18. The solid fat contents at various temperatures were: N10 = 24.8 N20 = 13.9 N30 = 3.4 N35 = 0 Microscopic examination of a margarine produced with this fat blend, according to the procedure outlined in Example 1 revealed no sandiness after a storage period of 9 weeks at 260 C. On consumption the margarine was as good as the product of Example 1. Example 3 The general procedure of Example 1 was repeated with the following fat blend: 74% of sunflower oil and 26% of a randomly interesterified blend consisting of 91% of sunflower oil hardened to a melting point of 39"C and 9% of acetone-fractionated palm oil stearin. The level of palmitic acid residues in the interesterifled blend was 13.4. The level of trans fatty acids in the total fat blend was 13.7. The level of linoleic acid residues in the total fat. blend was 519. The solid fat contents at various temperatures were: Nlo = 22.7 raj20 = 13.0 N30 = 4.0 N35 = 0.7 Microscopic examination of a margarine produced with this fat blend, according to the procedure outlined in in Example 1, revealed no sandiness after a storage period of 9 weeks at 200 C. On consumption the margarine was as good as the product of Example 1. Example 4 The general procedure of Example 1 was repeated with the following fat blend: 69% of sunflower oil, 31% of an interesterified fat blend consisting of 91% of sunflower oil and 9% of acetone-fractionated palm oil stearin. The interesterified blend was hydrogenated as a whole to a melting point of 37"C. The palmitic acid content of the interesterified blend was 12.78. The level of trans fatty acids in the total fat blend was 17.19. The level of linoleic acid residues in the total fat blend was 48.2%. The solii fat contents at various temperatures were: N10 = 24.9 N20 = 13.5 N30 = 3.5 tT35 = 0. Microscopic examination of a margarine produced with this fat blend, according to the procedure outlined in Example 1, revealed no sandiness after a storage period of 9 weeks at 200C. On consumption the margarine was as good as the product of Example 1. Examples 5-7 Three fat blends were produced according to the procedure outlined in Example 1. All three blends comprised 70% of sunflower oil and 30% of various interesterified mixtures. In Example 5 the interesterified mixture consisted of 90% of rapeseed oil hydrogenated to 430C and 10 of the above-mentioned stearin fraction. In Example 6 the interesterified mixture consisted of 95% of soybean oil hydrogenated to a m.p. of 41"C and 52 of the above-mentioned stearin fraction. In Example 7 the interesterified mixture consisted of 95 of corn oil hydrogenated to 350C and 5% of the above-mentioned stearin fraction. Microscopic examination of margarines produced from the ahove fat blends revealed no sandiness after a storage period of 5 weeks at 200C. The level of trans fatty acids, the level of linoleic acid in the fat blends and the palmitic acid content in the interesterified mixtures of Examples 5-7 were as follows: Fxam Level of Level of Level of pal trans fatty linoleic mitic acid in acids acid interest.mixt. 5 15% 46% 13.2% 6 21% 46% 15.2% 7 21% 46t 14.1% Examples 8 and 9 Two fat blends were produced from 70% of sunflower oil and 30% of a randomly interesterified mixture. In Example 8 the interesterified mixture consisted of 40% of cottonseed oil (m.p. 37"C) and 60% of sunflower oil (m.p. 41"C). In Example 9 the interesterified mixture consisted of 20% of hydrogenated palm oil (m.p. 44"C) and 808 of sunflower oil (m.p. 410C). Microscopic examination of margarines produced from the above fat blends revealed no sandiness after a storage period of 5 weeks at 200C. The level of trans fatty acids, the level of linoleic acid in the fat blends and of the palmitic acid residues in the interesterified mixtures of Examples 89 were as follows: Exam- Level of Level of Level of palple trans fatty linoleic mitic acid in acids acid interest.mixt. 8 19t 46% 12.9% 9 198 46% 14.3% Example 10 A fat blend was produced from 45t of sunflower oil and 55% of a randomly interesterified mixture of sunflower oil (m.p. 410C) and 10% of the stearin fraction obtained by acetone fractionation of palm oil (Ex. 1). Microscopic examination of margarines produced from the above fat blend revealed no sandiness after a storage period of 5 weeks at 200 C. The level of trans fatty acids in the fat blend was 348; the level of linoleic acid was 30%.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A margarine fat blend with a reduced tendency to sandiness which comprises an oil (a) having a level of linoleic acid residues of at least 20%, a hydrogenated fat (b) having a level of palmitic acid residues of at least 10%, obtained by interesterification of a fat (d) containing an appre ciabie proportion of palmitic acid residues, with a fat (c) which is prone to sandiness. 2. Margarine fat blend according to claim 1, in which oil (a) comprising sunflower oil, safflower oil, soybean oil, corn oil, rapeseed oil or mixtures thereof. 3. Margarine fat blend according to claim 1, in which fat (c) comprising sunflower oil, safflower oil, soybean oil, corn oil, rapeseed oil or mixtures thereof, hydrogenated to a melting point ranging from 30 to 400 C, under conditions promoting isomerism. 4. Margarine fat blend according to claim 3, in which fat (c) consists of sunflower oil hydrogenated to a melting point ranging from 34 to 430C and fat (a) consists of sunflower oil. 5. Margarine fat blend according to claim 3, in which the level of trans-fatty acids ranges from 15 to 30%. 6. flargari,le fat blend according to claim 1, in whitr!-, the level of linoleic acid residues ranges from 30-5 7. Margarine fat blend according to claim 6, in which the level of linoleic acid residues ranges from 40-48%. 8. Margarine fat blend according to claim 1, in which fat (d) consists of palm oil, tallow, herring oil, menhaden oil, cottonseed oil, butterfat, fractions of said fats or mixtures thereof, in hydrogenated or non-hydrogenated form. 9. Margarine fat blend according to claim 8, in which fat (d) has a level of palmitic acid residues ranging from 50 to 90%. 10. Margarine fat blend according to claim 9, in which fat (d) is the stearine fraction obtained by fractionation of palm oil. 11. Margarine fat blend according to claim 10, in which the palm stearine fraction has been obtained by fractionation of palm oil in the presence of a solvent. 12. Margarine fat blend according to claim 11, in which the palm stearine fraction is a fraction obtained by fractionation in the presence of acetone at a temperature ranging from 180 to 240 C. 13. Margarine fat blend according to claim 1, in which fat (b) is obtained by first carrying out inter esterifioation of a non-hydrogenated oil with the fat rich in palmitic acid residues and then hydrogenating the interesterified mixture to a melting point ranging from 30" to 48 C and preferably from 34 to 43"C, or by first hydrogenating the oil and subsequently conducting interesterification of the hydrogenated oil with the fat rich in palmitic acid resides. 14. Margarine fat blend according to claim 1, in which oil (a) is present in a proportion ranting from 30 to 75 % and fat (b) is present in a proportion ranging from 25 to 708. 15. Margarine fat blend according to claim 14, in which oil (a) is present in a proportion ranging from 60 to 759 and fat (b) is present in a proportion ranging from 25 to 40%. 16. Margarine fat blend according to claim 1, n which the ratio of fat (c) to fat (d) ranges from 20:1 to 5:1. 17. Margarine fat blend according to claim 16, in which the ratio of fat (c) to fat (d) ranges from 14:1 to 7:1. 18. Margarine fat blend according to claim 1, in which fat (d) constitutes 1-15%, preferably 2-88 of the total blend, whereas the remainder of the fat stems from hydrogenated and non-hydrogenated oil (a). 19. A process for producing a fat blend with a reduced tendency to develop sandiness, comprising adding to a fat (c), which is prone to sandiness, an effective amount of a fat (d) which is rich in palmitic acid residues and subjecting the mixture thus obtained to interesterification. 20. A process according to claim 19, in which fat (c) consists of an oil which has been hydrogenated under conditions prolootins isomerism. 21 A process according to claim 19, comprising using an oil (c) consisting of sunflower oil, saffloweroil, soybean oil, corn oil, rapeseed oil or a mixture thereof, which has been hydrogenated to a netting point ranging from 30 to 480C, at a temperature ranging from 140 to 1800C, using a sulphurpoisoned nickel catalyst. 22. A process according to claim 19, comprising using a proportion of fat (d) such that the level of palmitic acid residues in the fat blend is at least 10 & 23. A process according to claim 22, in which fat (d) consists of palm oil, tallow, herring oil, menhaden oil, cottonseed oil, butterfat, fractions thereof or mixtures thereof in hydrogenated or non-hydrogenated form. 24. A process according to claim 22, in which a fat (d) is used having a level of palmitic acid residues ranging from 50 to 908. 25. A process according to claim 24, in which fat (d) is obtained by fractionating palm oil in the presence of acetone at 18-240C and isolating the stearin fraction. CLAIMS EMI17.1 1. A process for producing a fat blend with a reduced tendency to develop sandiness, characterized in that an effective amount of an oil (a) having a level of linoleic acid residues of at least 20% is mixed with a hydrogenated fat (b) having a level of palmitic acid residues of at least 10%, obtained by interesterification of a fat (d) containing an appreciable proportion of palmitic acid residues with a fat (c) which is prone to sandiness. 2. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that oil (a) comprising sunflower oil, safflower oil, soybean oil, corn oil, rapeseed oil or mixtures thereof. 3. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that fat (c) comprising sunflower oil, safflower oil, soybean oil, corn oil, rapeseed oil or mixtures thereof, hydrogenated to a melting point ranging from 30 to 40"C, under conditions promoting isomerism. 4. A process according to claim 3, characterized in that fat (c) consists of sunflower oil hydrogenated to a melting point ranging from 34 to 430C and fat (a) consists of sunflower oil. 5. A process according to claim 3, characterized in that hydrogenation is carried out at 140-1800C using a sulphur-poisoned nickel catalyst, to achieve a level of trans-fatty acids ranging from 15 to 30%. 6. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that oil (a) is used in a proportion such that the level of linoleic acid residues in the fat blend ranges from 30 to 55%. 7. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that 30-75%, preferably 60-75% of oil (a) and 35-70t, preferably 25-40% of fat (b) are used. 8. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that a fat (d) is used which consists of palm oil, tallow, herring oil, menhaden oil, cottonseed oil, butterfat, fractions of said fats or mixtures thereof in hydrogenated or non-hydrogenated form. 9. A process according to claim 8, characterized in that a fat (d) is used which has a level of palmitic acid residues ranging from 50 to 90%. 10. A process according to claim 9, characterized in that fat (d) consists of a stearin fraction obtained by fractionation of palm oil. 11. A process according to claim 10, characterized in that fat (d) consists of a stearin fraction obtained by fractionation of palm oil in the presence of acetone at a temperature ranging from 18 to 240 C. 12. A process according to claim I, characterized in that fat (b) is obtained by first carrying out interesterification of a non-hydrogenated oil with the fat rich in palmitic acid residues and then hydrogenating the interesterified mixture to a melting point ranging from 30 to 480C and preferably from 34 to 43"C, or by first hydrogenating the oil and subsequently conduct ing the interesterification of the hydrogenated oil with the fat rich in palmitic acid residues. 13. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that fat (c) and fat (d) are used in a ratio ranging from 20:1 to 5:1. 14. A process according to. claim 13, characterized in that fat (c) and fat (d) are used in a ratio ranging from 14:1 to 7:1. 15. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that fat (d) constitutes I to 15%, preferably 2-8% of the total fat blend, whereas the remainder of the' fat stems from hydrogenated and non-hydrogenated oil (a).

Inventors: GERCAMA, ANNE, SCHIJF, ROBERT
Applicants: UNILEVER NV, UNILEVER PLC
Application year: 1983
Main classification: A23D3
IPC codes: A23D7, C11C3