PROCESS FOR IMPROVING AND RETAINING PULP PROPERTIES

Abstract: A method is provided for treating pulp fibres, that have already been curled which method comprises: subjecting the pulp to a heat treatment while the pulp is at a high consistency, thereby to render the curl permanent to subse­ quent mechanical action. This permanent curl has advan­ tages for papermachine runnability and for increasing the toughness of the finished product.

Description: 3. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION (i) Field of the Invention This invention relates to a process for treating lignocellulosic pulp fibres of either softwoods or hardwoods to provide pulps of improved properties. In particular this invention is directed to the treatment of mechanical pulps and high-yield chemical pulps to improve and retain the properties oE such pulps. (ii) Description of the Prior Art Newsprint traditionally has been manufactured from a furnish consisting of a mixture of a mechanical pulp and a chemical pulp. Mechanical pulp is used because it imparts certain desired properties to the furnish: namely, its high light scattering coefficient contributes to paper opacity and allows the use of a thinner sheet; its high oil absorbency improves ink acceptance during printing. Chemical pulps are used because they impart properties to the furnish which improve its runnability. Runnability refers to properties which allow the wet web to be transported at high speed through the forming, pressing and drying sections of a papermachine and allows the dried paper sheet to be reeled and printed in an acceptable manner. Runnability contributes to papermachine and pressroom efficiency. It is believed that improved runnahility in chemical pulp is due to high wet-web strength and drainage rate. Wet and dry stretch are important because they are believed to contribute to preventing concentrations of stress around paper defects, thereby minimizing broads, High drainage rates lower the water content and are believed to yield a less fragile web. Mechanical pulp. including stone groundwood (SO) and pressurized stone groundwood (PESO) can be made to provide wet stretch but only at the expense of poor drainage. Higher quality mechanical pulps are obtained by manufacture in open discharge refiners, to produce refiner mechanical pulp (RMP) and in pressurized thermomechanical pulp (TMP). Still further upgraded mechanical pulps were provided by chemical pretreatment of the wood chips prior to refining to provide chemimechanical pulp (CMP or CTMP). U.S. Patent 3,446,699 issued May 27, 1965 to Asplund et al. provided a method for producing mechanical and chemimechanical or semichemical pulps from lignocellulose-containing material, in order to provide what was alleged to be improved quality of the fibres with improved defibration. U.S. Patent 3,558,428 issued Jan. 26, 1971 to Asplund et al. provided a method for manufacturing chemimechanical pulps involving heating and defibrating the same in an atmosphere of vapour at elevated temperatures and under corresponding pressure of the impregnated chips to provide a more rapid and effective impregnation. U.S. Patent 4,116,758 issued Sept. 26, 1978 to M.J. Ford provided a process for producing high-yield chemimechanical pulps from woody lignocellulose material by treatment with an aqueous solution of a mixture of sulfite and bisulfite, to provide a pulp which can be readily defibered by customary mechanical means to provide a pulp having excellent strength characteristics. Today's papermaker is faced with the problems of decreasing forest resources, an increasing demand for paper products and stringent environmental laws. Lcw- yield chemical pulps, e.g. sulphite and kraft pulps, contribute highly to such problems. The fibres of low-yield chemical pulps are known for their desirable dry- and wet-web strength properties. Observations of low-yield chemical fibres in a formed paper sheet indicate that these tend to have a kink and curl which is said to contribute, in an advantageous way, to the papermachine runnability and to certain physical properties. Mechanical pulps lack the desirable strength properties to replace, in whole or in part, low-yield chemical pulps, e.g. kraft or sulphite pulps, in linerboard, newsprint, tissue, printing grades and coated-base grade of paper. Consequently, it has been an aim of the art to improve the physical properties of mechanical and high-yield chemical pulps, so that such improved pulps would be used to replace low-yield chemical pulps. A number of mechanical devices have been built to produce curled chemical and mechanical fibres in order to improve certain physical properties. Two such mechanical fibre-curling devices are disclosed in H.S. Hill, U.S. Pat. 2,516,384 and E.F. Erikson U.S. Pat. 3,054,532. H.S. Hill et al. in Tappi, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 36-44, 1950, described a "Curlator" designed to produce curled fibres. The process consisted of rolling fibres into bundles at a consistency of around 15%-35%, followed by dispersion. Advantages claimed were higher wet-web stretch, improved drainage, and higher tear strength and stretch of the finished product. These advantages were at the expense of certain other properties, notably tensile strength. W.B. West in Tappi, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 313-317, 1964, describes high consistency disc refining to produce the same action. D.H. Page in Pulp Paper Mag. Canada, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. T2-12, 1966, showed that the curl introduced was both at a gross level and at a fine level which he called "microcompressions'1. Both types of curl were advantageous. J.H. De Grace and D.H. Page in Tappi, Vol. 59, No. 7, pp. 98-101, 1976, showed that curl could be produced adventitiously during bleaching of pulps, by the mechanical action of pumps and stirrers at high consistency. R.P. Kibblewhite and D. Brookes in Appita, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 227-231, 1975, claimed that this adventitious curl could have advantages for practical runnability of papermachines. High-consistency mechanical defibration of wood chips is known to produce curled, kinked and twisted fibres. Kinked fibres are known to be particularly effective in developing extensibility in wet webs if the kinks are set in position so that they survive the action of pumps and agitators at low consistency and retain their kinked and curled state in the formed sheet. This ensures enhancement of the wet-web stretch and certain other physical properties. A number of chemical treatment methods have been reported to enhance and retain fibre curl in a refined pulp. In one, Canadian Patent No. 1,102,969 issued June 16, 1981 to A.J. Kerr et al., improvement in tear- ing strength of the pulp is alleged by the treatment of delignified lignocellulosic or cellulose pulp derived from a chemical, semichemical or chemimechanical pulps ing process at a pressure of at least one atmosphere, with sufficient gaseous ammonia to be taken up by moist pulp in an amount greater than 3E by weight to weight of oven dried pulp. In another, Canadian Patent No. 1,071,805 issued Feb. 19, 1980 to A.J. Barnet et al., a method of treatment of mechanical wood pulp is provided by cooking the pulp with aqueous sodium sulphite solution containing sufficient alkali to maintain a pH greater than about 3 during the cooking. The cooking was effected at an elevated temperature for a time sufficient to cause reaction with the pulp and to increase the drainage and wet stretch thereof, but for a time insufficient to cause substantial dissolution of liquor from the pulp, and insufficient to result in a pulp yield below about 908. A minimum concentration of sodium sulphite was 19 since, below 1% sodium sulphite improvements were said to be too small to justify the expense of treatment. 4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION During the process of papermaking, most of the curl in both high-consistency refined mechanical and high-yield sulphite pulp is lost in the subsequent steps of handling at low consistency and high tempera- tures. This is also taught in the article by H.W.H. Jones in Pulp Paper Mag. Canada, Vol. 67, No. 6, pp. T283-29L, 1966. Jones showed that when mechanical pulp fibres which are curled during high consistency refining are subjected to mild mechanical action in dilute suspension at a temperature of around 700C the curl tends to be removed. The increased tensile and burst strengths produced by removal of curl was seen as advantageous, Thus, curl in such pulps is normally removed in papermachine operation, since during practical papermaking, pulps are always subjected to mild mechanical action in dilute suspension at temperatures of the order of 700C. High-yield and ultra high-yield sulphite pulps are used as reinforcing pulps for manufacture of newsprint and other groundwood-containing papers. Although they may be subjected to high-consistency refining, their fibres are in practice substantially straight because the curl introduced in high-consistency refining is lost in subsequent handling. Thus, we have identified requirements for a process for imparting and rendering permanent, the physical properties of such mechanical and high-yield chemical pulps in order to improve their papermachine runnability and pressroom effici ency, and an object ot this invention is to provi@e im provements in one or more of these respects. There is below an example of - also described # a non-chemical method of treating higheryield pulps to improve and retain certain physical properties so that the pulp can be used to replace in whole or in part, the low-yield chemical pulps. Another example, described below, 0 a method of the is invention, /to render permanent, by non-chemical means, the curl imparted to the fibres of high-consistency mechanically treated, mechanical and high-yield chemical pulps. The mechanical pulps or high-yie'd chemical pulps included within the ambit of this invention can be produced by either mechanical defibration of wood, e.g. in stone groundwood (SG), pressurized stone groundwood (PSG), refiner mechanical pulp (RNP) and thermomechanical pulp (TMP) production or by mechanical defibration, at high consistency, followed or preceded by a chemical treatment of wood chips and pulps e.g. in the production of ultra-high-yield sulphite pulps (UHYS, yields in the range 100-85%), high-yield sulphite pulps (HYS) yields in the range 85-65%), chemi-thermomechanical (CTMP), high-yield chemimechanical (CMP), interstage thermomechanical and chemically post-treated mechanical pulp (MPC) or thermomechanical pulps (TMPC). By a broad aspect of this invention, a method is provided for treating pulps, that have already been curled, which method comprises: subjecting the pulp to a heat treatment while the pulp is at a high consistency in the form of nodules or entangled mass, thereby to render the curl permanent to subsequent mecg 4 4 action. By another aspect of this invention, a method is provided for treating high-yield or mechanical pulp., that have already been curled by a mechanical action at high consistency, which method comprises: subjecting the pulp to a heat treatment at a temperature of at least 100 C, while the pulp is at a high consistency of at least 15% thereby to render the curl permanent to subsequent mechanical action. By yet another aspect of this invention, a method is provided for treating high-yield or mechanical pulp., that have already been curled by a high-consistency action, which method comprises: subjecting the pulp to a heat treatment at a temperature of 1OO.C- 170 C for a time varying between 60 minutes and 2 minutes, while the pulp is at a high consistency of 151 to 35%, thereby to render the curl permanent to subsequent mechanical action. The present invention in its broad aspects is a method which follows the mechanical action that has already made the fibres curly in either mechanical, ultra high-yield or high-yield pulps. Such a mechanical action generally takes place at high consistency (158-358), and may typically be a high-consistency disc refining action, e.g. as is generally used in pulp manufacture. The method of aspects of this invention thus consists of a simple heat treatment of the pulp in the presence of water while it is retained in the form of nodules or entangled mass at high consistency. The process may involve temperatures above 100 C in which case a pressure vessel is required. While the invention is not to be limited to any theory, it is believed that the method sets the curl in place either by relief of stresses in the fibre or by a cross-linking mechanism, so that upon subsequent processing during papermaking, the fibres retain their curled form. This curled form has particular advantages for the properties of the wet web, so that the runnability of the papermachine is improved. In addition, the toughness of the finished product is increase. In general terms, the method begins with a pulp that has been converted to the curly state by mechanical action at high consistency, and in which the fibres are held in a curly state in the for° of nodules or entangled mass. The pulp may be either purely mechanical e.g. stone groundwood, pressurized stone groundwood, refiner mechanical, thermomechanical, or a chemimechanical pulp such as ultra high-yield sulphte pulp or high-yield sulphite pulp. Conversion to a curly state is generally achieved naturally in the high-consistency refining action that is normally used for refiner mechanical, thermomechanical and ultra highyield sulphite pulp. For stone groundwood, pressurized stone groundwood and high-yield sulphite pulp, it would be necessary to add to the normal processing a step that curls the fibres. This may be for example by use of the "Curlator" or high-consistency disc refining, or by use of the 11Frotapulper (E.F. Erikson, U.S. Pat. 3,054,532). The pulp fibres may be lignocellulosic fibres produced by mechanical defibration, or by refining, or by refining' in a disc refiner at high consistency, or by mechanical defibration at high consistency of wood chips, or by mechanical defibration at high consistency of wood chips followed or preceded by a chemical treatment, or by a single stage refining, or after two successive refining, or between two successive refinings. They may alternatively be pulp fibres commercially produced under the designation of refiner mechanical pulp, pressurized refiner mechanical pump and thermomechanical pulp either from a single stage or two-stage refining, or commercially produced under the designation of ultra high-yield pulp., high-yield pulp., highyield chemimechanical pulps, interstage thermomechanical pulps and chemically post-treated mechanical or thermomechanical pulp., or may be part of the furnish, e.g. the refined rejects in mechanical pulp production or may be whole pulps. The method consists of taking the curled pulp at high consistency (say 15-35%) in the form of nodules or entangled mass and subjecting it to heat treatment without appreciable drying of the pulp. The temperature and duration of the heat treatment controls the extent to which the curl in the fibres is rendered permanent, and this may be adjusted to match the advantages sought. This method may be carried out as a batch method in a digester or as a continuous r?etllod th64 steaming tube maintained at high pressure. The method may also include the step of incorporating a brightening agent during heat treatment, to upgrade the brightness while retaining the improved pulp properties; or the subsequent steps of brightening or bleaching sequences to upgrade the brightness or- the pulps while maintaining the improved pulp properties; or indeed may be carried out in brightened pulps thereby also to maintain adequate brightness after heat treatment. Nowhere in the prior art is there disclosed a process in which a separate and sole heat treatment at high consistency and high temperatures is given to curled fibres in order to achieve the desired changes in the properties of the wood pulp being treated. examples of Among the advantages of the/methods of as described below - - this invention/in setting in fibre curl in high-yield pulps and mechanical pulps is to provide a means of controlling pulp properties in order to impart high wet-web stretch, work-to-rupture and increased drainage rates. In the case of high-yield pulps, in addition to the above wet-web properties, higher dry-sheet tear strength and stretch are also obtained. Thus, this invention concerns the discovery that when lignocellulosic pulp fibres, that have already been made curly, are heat treated at (a) consistencies from 10% to 35%, (b) temperatures from 1000C to 1700C using steam at corresponding pressures of 5 psig to 105 psig, (c) for a period of time of from 2 minutes to 60 minutes, fibre curl permanently set@ @@ place, and the curl is made resistant to removal in subsequent mechanical action experienced by fibres in the papermaking process. The method of aspects of this invention improves drainage, wet-web stretch, wet-web work-to-rupture and dry-sheet tear strength and stretch. In one variant, the method is to take a pulp that ha3 been made curly by high-consistency (20-35%) refining, and to set in the curl (and perhaps microcompressions) by subjecting it at a high consistency to an elevated temperature (e.g. llO'C - 160'C) for a brief time (e.g. 1 minute to 1 hour). This set-in curl is resistant to removal by the hot disintegration experienced during papermaking. The advantages of such a pulp are: 1. higher wet-web stretch; 2. higher tearing strength; and 3. better drainage. The method may be a batch process, i.e. if the pulp is placed in a pressure vessel e.g. a closed reaction vessel or digester, or it may be a continuous process e.g. through a steaming tube maintaining high pressures. The temperature and duration of the heat treatment controls the extent to which the curl in the fibres is rendered permanent, and this may be adjusted to match the advantages sought. Preferred conditions are as follows: temperatures of from above 100" to 170 with corresponding steam pressures of 5 psig to 105 psig and for periods from 2 minutes to 60 minutes. The treatment according to aspects of this inven tion has been observed to render fibre curl per@@ent including fibre twists, kinks and microrsom.pressions. Either during or after completion or the heat treatment the pulp may then be brightened in accordance with any of the well-known conventional brightening sequences. In general, pulp fibres obtained after refining at high consistency are very curly. For mechanical pulps, if a mild disintegration treatment at room temperature is made on these pulps, the fibres retain substantially their curliness so as to produce wet webs with high wet-web stretch, work-to-rupture and fast drainage. However, in the papermaking process, pulps receive mechanical action at high temperatures and low consistencies so that their curliness is lost. It is believed that pulps which are given standard hot disintegration treatment in the laboratory at low consistency experience similar conditions during which the curliness is lost and the wet-web properties deteriorate. The following examples are given to illustrate more clearly various embodiments of the invention. In the following examples, the tests were conducted in the following standard way: Wet-web results were obtained following the procedure described by R.S. Seth, M.C. Barbe, J.C.R. Williams and D.H. Page in Tappi, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 135-138, 1982. Wet-web percent solids, tensile strength, stretch and work-to-rupture were obtained on webs prepared by applying 0.7 kPa and 103 kPa wet-pressing pressures, The percent stretch-to-treat was obtained tor wetwebs pressed so as to give a breaking length of 100 meters. It is considered that this value is a measure of the "toughness" of the wet-web and is an indication of the runnability of the pulp on a papermachine. Changes in drainage rates are given by the measure of Canadian Standard Freeness. Hot disintegration was done according to the procedure of C.W. Skeet and R.S. Allan..in Pulp Paper Mag. Canada, Vol. 69, No. 8, pp. T222-224, April 19,1968. The extent of fibre curliness has been quantified by an Image Analysis method as described by B.D. Jordan and D.H. Page in the Proceedings of the TAPPI Inter-. national Paper Physics Conference, Harrison Hot Springs, B.C. (1979). High values of curl indices reflect curlier fibres. In the examples following, two parameters have been used to follow the progress of the heat treatment effect. First the curliness of the fibres has been measured, after a standard hot disintegration treatment at low consistency, that simulates the subsequent treatment that the pulp will receive in the papermaking process. Secondly, the advantage of this new pulp (after hot disintegration) has been determined in terms of the extensibility (percent stretch-to-break) of wet webs prepared from the pulp pressed so as to give a breaking length of 100 metres. It is considered that this value is a measure of the "toughness" of the wet shenzq 4t is an indication of the runnability of the pulp on a papermachine. EXAMPLE 1 This example is intended to illustrate that when pulp fibres are given a heat treatment, as described for aspects of this invention, they remain curly even after standard hot disintegration. In this example pulp fibres were treated in a digester at 1500C and at about 22% consistency for approximately 60 minutes. The results obtained after the above treatments on a variety of mechanical, chemimechanical and chemical wood pulp fibres are reproduced below in Table I. From the results, it is seen that the heat treatment produces the desired effects, on wet-web stretch and drainage, for all the lignocellulosic pulp fibres, e.g., mechanical pulp and high-yield sulphite pu?p fibres. The treatment has no effect on cellulosic pulp fibres which contain little or no lignin. EXAMPLE 2 This example illustrates the effect of the temperature of the treatment. Lignocellulosic pulp fibres were treated in a digester at temperatures of 110, 130, 150 and 1700C for 60 minutes and at approximately 22% consistency. The results reproduced in Table II were obtained after a standard hot disintegration. TABLE I (Sheet 1) THE EFFECT OF THE HEAT TREATMENT (150 C, 22% CONSISTENCY, 60 MINUTES) ON A VARIETY OF MECHANICAL, CHEMI-MECHANICAL AND CHEMICAL WOOD PULP FIBRES SG1 PSG1 RMP2 Heat Heat Heat Pulp and Fibre Properties Untreated Treated Untreated Treated Untreated Treated Curl Index 0.180 0.204 0.163 0.203 0.143 0.258 CSF (ml) 61 60 48 47 159 248 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 17.8 14.5 15.7 14.7 18.3 19.2 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 47.7 48.8 63.7 65.3 60.6 48.0 Stretch (%) 7.05 11.7 8.91 12.8 5.05 11.3 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 39.7 62.7 70.4 105 38.3 58.3 Solids (%) 20.2 20.4 24.4 20.5 24.8 24.2 103 kPa Tensile (m) 96.1 101 133 124 117 80.5 Stretch (%) 7.13 9.45 8.26 11.3 4.85 9.19 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 77.4 110 131 177 73.5 84.3 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 6.29 8.49 8.16 11.4 4.50 7.64 1 Commercial samples 2 Refined at 6.75 MJ/kg and 17% consistency TABLE I (Sheet 2) THE EFFECT OF THE HEAT TREATMENT (150 C, 22% CONSISTENCY, 60 MINUTES) ON A VARIETY OF MECHANICAL, CHEMI-MECHANICAL AND CHEMICAL WOOD PULP FIBRES TMPC4 TMP3 (94% yield) (90% yield)5 Heat Heat Heat Pulp and Fibre Properties Untreated Treated Untreated Treated Untreated Treated Curl Index 0.121 0.239 0.182 0.229 0.102 0.220 CSF (ml) 181 287 208 221 256 340 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 18.9 18.4 20.8 17.1 22.7 17.3 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 91.5 60.5 122 74.1 72.6 59.3 Stretch (%) 6.32 18.6 8.83 20.8 4.15 13.2 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 69.0 124 129 203 35.7 90.5 Solids (%) 25.6 22.5 27.2 22.8 29.7 23.4 103 kPa Tensile (m) 161 105 207 125 134 114 Stretch (%) 4.82 14.9 5.68 16.3 3.24 7.08 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 90.8 201 136 272 48.9 95.3 Wet-Web Strtech at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 5.90 16.9 7.38 18.2 3.53 8.54 3 Refined at 8.09 MJ/kg and 30% consistency after second stage 4 Pulp (3); cooked to 94% yield by sodium-base sulphite liquor at 10% consistency 5 Refined at 7.60 MJ/kg and 17% consistency TABLE I (Sheet 3) THE EFFECT OF THE HEAT TREATMENT (150 C, 22% CONSISTENCY, 60 MINUTES) ON A VARIETY OF MECHANICAL, CHEMI-MECHANICAL AND CHEMICAL WOOD PULP FIBRES SULPHITE PULPS KRAFT PULP (78% yield)6 (70% yield)7 $(50% yield)8 (50% yield)8 Heat Heat Heat Heat Pulp and Fibre Properties Untreated Treated Untreated Treated Untreated Treated Untreated Treated Curl Index 0.169 0.220 0.148 0.216 0.236 0.285 0.208 0.254 CSF (ml) 236 326 673 624 654 691 675 709 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 20.6 19.2 26.1 21.5 27.4 27.2 27.5 34.3 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 144 111 82.8 84.1 97.8 64.6 96.9 61.5 Stretch (%) 6.38 16.2 2.38 9.79 21.5 25.5 15.8 17.8 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 116 244 20.3 110 234 170 174 125 Solids (%) 28.3 24.6 29.1 29.2 30.0 32.0 32.0 38.7 103 kPa Tensile (m) 283 183 143 145 120 82.3 122 77.7 Stretch (%) 5.04 12.3 1.95 5.88 17.5 22.3 9.87 11.6 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 162 286 27.3 94.6 241 196 129 96.1 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 8.0 17.7 2.23 8.05 20.1 19.0 13.5 9.@ 6 Refined at 2.20 MJ/kg and 17% consistency 7 Refined at 0.57 MJ/kg and 9% consistency 8 Curlated in a mixer for 2.5 hours at 20% consistency TABLE II (Sheet 1) THE EFFECT OF THE TEMPERATURE OF THE TREATMENT Refiner Mechanical1 Pulp Treatment Temperature ( C) Untreated 110 130 150 170 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.143 0.178 0.225 0.258 0.259 CSF (ml) 159 207 259 248 231 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 18.3 18.2 23.2 19.2 18.0 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 60.6 62.4 65.5 48.0 50.7 Stretch (%) 5.05 7.73 7.28 11.3 12.5 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 38.3 45.8 58.5 58.3 77.7 Solids (%) 24.8 23.2 25.0 24.2 22.1 103 kPa Tensile (m) 117 104 93.4 80.5 80.7 Stretch (%) 4.85 5.62 6.75 9.19 10.4 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 73.5 69.8 75.7 84.3 100 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 4.50 5.86 6.50 7.64 9.52 1 Refined at 6.75 MJ/kg and 17% consistency TABLE II (Sheet 2) THE EFFECT OF THE TEHPERATURE OF THE TREATMENT Thermomechanical2 Pulp Treatment Temperature ( C) Untreated 110 130 150 170 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.121 0.138 0.180 0.239 0.261 CSF (ml) 181 244 292 287 284 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 18.9 18.6 18.6 18.4 19.4 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 91.5 85.5 75.4 60.5 56.4 Stretch (%) 6.32 8.61 13.0 18.6 19.6 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 69.0 88.9 114 124 143 Solids (%) 25.6 23.4 22.7 22.5 23.6 103 kPa Tensile (m) 161 147 117 105 88.5 Stretch (%) 4.82 6.87 11.1 14.9 18.8 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 90.8 119 187 201 216 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 5.90 8.13 12.7 16.9 18.0 2 Refined at 8.09 MJ/kg and pulp at 30% consistency after second stage refining TABLE II (Sheet 3) THE EFFECT OF THE TEMPERATURE OF THE TREATMENT High-Yield Sulphite Pulp (90% yield)3 Treatment Temperature ( C) Untreated 110 130 150 170 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.153 0.166 0.206 0.226 0.221 CSF (ml) 279 292 358 287 269 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 20.5 22.5 20.8 19.2 17.3 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 73.3 74.5 60.2 63.0 72.1 Stretch (%) 5.45 6.51 11.1 15.8 14.9 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 49.0 71.9 97.9 107 137 Solids (%) 24.9 26.5 23.9 23.4 21.8 103 kPa Tensile (m) 118 107 97.6 101 120 Stretch (%) 4.02 5.42 7.82 11.1 11.2 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 56.7 76.0 110 143 157 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 4.61 5.54 7.96 10.9 12.5 3 Refined at 7.60 MJ/kg and 17% consistency <RTI ID=22.1> TABLE II (Sheet 4) THE EFFECT OF THE TEMPERATURE OF THE TREATMENT High-Yield Sulphite Pulp (70% yield)4 Treatment Temperature ( C) Untreated 110 130 150 170 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.147 0.181 0.217 0.237 0.239 CSF (ml) 685 692 675 601 648 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 27.4 27.3 26.3 24.3 25.9 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 74.0 75.8 76.5 91.6 68.5 Stretch (%) 2.10 4.07 8.81 17.8 5.04 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 16.2 32.1 93.7 189 38.4 Solids (%) 31.1 31.1 30.3 28.6 30.7 103 kPa Tensile (m) 124 121 108 124 117 Stretch (%) 2.00 3.37 5.06 12.2 3.75 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 26.3 39.4 73.9 203 49.7 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 2.21 3.72 6.23 15.3 4.04 4 Refined at 0.64 MJ/kg and 30% consistency EXAMPLE 3 This example illustrates the effect of the time for the treatment. Lignocellulosic pulp fibres at approximately 22% consistency were treated in a digester at 1500C for 2, 10 and 60 minutes respectively. The results reproduced in Table III were obtained after a standard hot disintegration. It can be seen that the time, as well as the temperature (Example 2), control the extent to which the curl in the fibres is rendered permanent. Both variables can be adjusted to yield pulp with the required properties sought. In addition to the time to maintain the desired properties of curly fibres and temperature of the treatment described above, the extent to which fibre. curl is present, after heat treatment and hot disintegration also depends on the state of the fibres immediately after refining. In Table III it can be seen that for two 70%-yield sulphide pulps, the one refined at 30% consistency, i.e., containing more curly fibres, will require a shorter heat treatment and/or a treatment at a lower temperature to achieve the same wet-web strength properties as that for the pulp refined at 9t consistency. EXAMPLE 4 This example illustrates the effect of the consistency of the pulp fibres when submitted to heat treatment. TABLE III (Sheet 1) THE EFFECT OF THE TIME FOR THE TREATMENT Refiner Mechanical Pulp1 Thermomechanical Pulp2 Time for Treatment (minutes) Untreated 2 10 60 Untreated 2 10 60 Pulp and Fibre properties Curl Index 0.143 0.189 0.210 0.258 0.121 0.152 0.168 0.239 CSF (ml) 159 214 206 248 181 200 225 287 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 18.3 20.5 17.9 19.2 18.9 20.8 20.5 18.4 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 60.6 57.4 58.8 48.0 91.5 78.4 80.1 60.5 Stretch (%) 5.05 7.73 9.83 11.3 6.32 8.82 11.2 18.6 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 38.3 54.5 63.5 58.3 69.0 89.5 112 124 Solids (%) 24.8 27.5 23.0 24.2 25.6 26.1 27.0 22.5 103 kPa Tensile (m) 117 107 97.2 80.5 161 125 135 105 Stretch (%) 4.85 5.17 7.51 9.19 4.82 6.57 7.79 14.9 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 73.5 66.1 83.1 84.3 90.8 115 135 201 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 4.50 5.32 7.66 7.64 5.90 7.62 9.53 16.9 1 Refined at 6.75 MJ/kg and 17% consistency 2 Refined at 8.09 MJ/kg and 30% consistency TABLE III (Sheet 2) THE EFFECT OF THE TIME FOR THE TREATMENT High-Yield Sulphite Pulp3 High-Yield Sulphite Pulp4 (90% yield) (70% yield) Time for Treatment (minutes) Untreated 2 10 60 Untreated 2 10 60 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.102 0.178 0.179 0.220 0.148 0.155 0.218 0.216 CSF (ml) 256 294 363 340 673 674 694 624 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 22.7 20.4 18.5 17.3 26.1 28.1 25.0 21.5 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 72.6 57.1 47.1 59.3 82.8 86.2 71.5 84.1 Stretch (%) 4.15 7.48 9.57 13.2 2.38 2.57 4.84 9.79 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 35.7 56.5 57.8 90.5 20.3 23.5 40.3 110 Solids (%) 29.7 25.0 24.5 23.4 29.1 31.0 31.5 29.2 103 kPa Tensile (m) 134 100 95.4 114. 143 124 130 145 Stretch (%) 3.24 5.04 6.17 7.08 1.95 2.23 3.40 5.88 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 48.9 69.1 72.6 95.2 27.3 28.4 49.5 94.6 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 3.53 5.17 6.01 8.54 2.23 2.36 3.76 8.05 3 Refined at 7.60 MJ/kg and 17% consistency 4 Refined at 0.57 MJ/kg and 9% consistency TABLE III (Sheet 3) THE EFFECT OF THE TIME FOR THE TREATMENT High-Yield Sulphite Pulp5 (70% Yield) Time for Treatment (minutes) Untreated 2 10 60 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.147 0.187 0.214 0.237 CSF (ml) 685 698 678 601 Wet-Web Properties Solids (%) 27.4 24.6 24.5 24.3 0.7 kPa Tensile (m) 74.0 51.5 91.4 91.6 Stretch (%) 2.10 6.11 18.3 17.8 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 16.2 35.2 201 189 Solids (%) 31.1 30.0 31.0 28.6 103 kPa Tensile (m) 124 94.4 150 124 Stretch (%) 2.00 4.15 9.97 12.2 Work to Rupture (mJ/g) 26.3 45.2 158 203 Wet-Web Stretch at 100 m Breaking Length (%) 2.21 4.31 16.5 15.3 5 Refined at 0.64 MJ/kg and 30% consistency Lignocellulosic pulp fibres were treated in a digester at 150iC for 60 minutes at consistencies of 5, 10, 20, and 25%. For the purposes of this specification, the term "% consistency" means the percentage of oven-dried weight of pulp fibres to the total weight of pulp fibres plus water. The results reproduced in Table IV were obtained after a standard hot disintegration. The effect of the treatment is greater, the higher the consistency of the pulp fibres. The treatment has no effect on pulp fibres at low consistency, typically lower than 5%. EXAMPLE 5 This example illustrates the effect of the heat treatment on the wet-web and dry-handsheet properties of high-yield pulps. The lignocellulosic pulp fibres were heat treated in a digester at 1500C and at about 20% consistency for approximately 60 minutes. For the pulp fibres, in the high-yield range, the heat treatment improves, in addition to the wet-web stretch and work to rupture, the dry handsheet tear strength and stretch (Table V). EXAMPLE 6 This example illustrates the effect of the pH of the pulp fibres during the heat treatment. A 70% yield sulphite pulp at a pH of 3.2 was heat treated in a digester at 1500C and at about 20% consistency for approximately 60 minutes. Another sample of the same TABLE IV (Sheet 1) THE EFFECT OF THE CONSISTENCY OF THE PULP FIBRES DURING HEAT TREATMENT Consistency of pulp fibres Thermomechanical Pulp1 during heat treatment (%) Untreated 5 10 20 25 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.121 0.169 0.154 0.233 0.243 CSF (ml) 181 255 217 281 302 Wet-Web Properties 0.7 kPa Solids (%) 18.9 24.9 19.4 21.9 22.0 Tnesile (m) 91.5 93.6 90.6 59.1 62.3 Stretch (%) 6.32 10.8 9.28 16.5 17.6 Work to rupture (mJ/g) 69.0 137 108 119 129 103 kPa Solids (%) 25.6 26.4 25.7 26.3 25.3 Tensile (m) 161 134 153 98.8 101 Stetech (%) 4.82 9.52 7.84 14.0 16.8 Work to rupture (mJ/g) 90.8 163 148 174 208 Wet-web stretch at 100 m breaking length (%) 5.90 10.36 9.12 13.7 16.9 1 Refined at 8.09 MJ/kg and 30% consistency TABLE IV (Sheet 2) THE EFFECT OF THE CONSISTENCY OF THE PULP FIBRES DURING HEAT TREATMENT Consistency of pulp fibres High-Yield Sulphite Pulp (90% Yield)2 during heat treatment (%) Untreated 5 10 20 25 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.128 0.163 0.181 0.201 0.216 CSF (ml) 338 414 390 403 429 Wet-Web Properties 0.7 kPa Solids (%) 22.5 21.3 21.7 19.8 19.3 Tensile (m) 69.5 69.3 62.3 63.0 64.5 Stretch (%) 4.98 5.94 8.09 12.8 14.3 Work to rupture (mJ/g) 39.0 47.2 65.0 95.3 118 103 kPa Solids (%) 26.4 27.5 24.5 22.7 23.2 Tensile (m) 128 128 103 100 102 Stretch (%) 3.38 4.22 5.47 11.3 12.2 Work to rupture (mJ/g) 49.2 69.7 71.8 155 169 Wet-web stretch at 100 m breaking length (%) 3.96 5.16 6.21 10.3 11.1 2 Refined at 6.89 MJ/kg and 17% consistency TABLE V (Sheet 1) THE EFFECT OF THE HEAT TREATMENT ON THE WET-WEB AND DRY HANDSHEET PROPERTIES OF HIGH-YIELD PULPS 78% Yield Sulphite Pulp 70% Yield Sulphite Pulps Refined at 2.20 MJ/kg Refined at 0.64 MJ/kg and 17% consistency and 30% consistency Untreated Heat treated Untreated Heat treated Pulp and fiber properties Curl index 0.169 0.220 0.147 0.237 CSF/ml 236 326 685 601 Wet-Web properties 0.7 kPa Solids (%) 20.6 19.2 27.4 24.3 tensile (m) 144 111 74.0 91.6 stretch (%) 6.38 16.2 2.10 17.8 work to rupture (MJ/g) 116 244 16.2 189 103 kPa solids (%) 28.3 24.6 31.1 28.6 tensile (m) 283 183 124 124 stretch (%) 5.04 12.3 2.00 12.2 work to rupture (MJ/g) 162 286 26.3 203 Wet-Web stretch at 100 m breaking length (%) 8.0 17.7 2.21 15.3 Dry handsheet properties Bulk (cm3/g) 1.54 1.66 1.86 1.57 Burst index (kPa.m2/g) 6.96 5.58 5.81 4.56 Tear index (mN.m2/g) 6.33 9.98 8.76 9.85 Breaking length (m) 10204 7991 8750 7159 Stretch (%) 2.89 3.71 2.68 3.20 Toughness index (mJ) 177 272 139 138 Zero-span b.l. (km) 14.38 14.05 15.79 14.56 Scattering coeff. (cm2/g) 177 234 212 200 Tappi opacity (%) 70.4 91.7 76.1 73.0 Iso-Brightness (%) 42.8 35.3 44.6 41.4 Absorption coeff. (cm2/g) 13.33 21.19 15.47 16.44 TABLE V (Sheet 2) THE EFFECT OF THE HEAT TREATMENT ON THE WET-WEB AND DRY HANDSHEET PROPERTIES OF HICH-YIELD PULPS 70% Yield Sulphite Pulps Refined at 0.78 MJ/kg Refined at 0.57 MJ/kg and 24% consistency and 9% consistency Untreated Heat treated Untreated Heat treated Pulp and fiber properties Curl index 0.138 0.227 0.148 0.216 CAF/ml 662 627 673 624 Wet-Web properties 0.7 kP8 solids (%) 27.4 23.3 26.1 21.5 tensile (m) 91.8 78.5 82.8 84.1 stretch (%) 2,19 16.6 2.38 9.79 work to rupture (MJ/8) 19.0 160 20.3 110 103 kP2 solids (%) 31.8 28.9 29.1 29.2 tensile (m) 158 119 143 145 stretch (%) 2,34 9.24 1.95 5.88 work to rupture (MJ/g) 36.4 133 27.3 94.6 Wet-Web stretch at 100 m breaking length (%) 2.34 11.8 2.23 8.05 Dry handsheet properties Bult (cm3/g) 1.74 1.56 1.81 1.59 Burst index (kPa.m2/g) 6.73 4.81 6.24 5.44 Tear index (mN.m2/g) 8.26 10.07 8.22 8.71 Breaking length (m) 9422 7041 9704 8246 Stretch (%) 2,79 3.16 2.63 3.00 Toughness indez (mJ) 159 138 150 131 Zero-span b.I. (km) 16.12 14.94 16.45 16.36 Scattering coeff. (cm2/g) 208 208 219 211 Tappl opacity (Z) 76.3 75.5 77.2 74.1 Iso-Erightness (%) 44.8 42.2 45.3 42.0 Absorption coeff. (cm2/g) 14.88 16.24 14.68 16.51 pulp was sprayed with a solution of sodium carbonate to increase its pH to 10.0 and was also given a heat treatment at the same conditions. Both heat treated pulps show remarkable improvement in wet-web properties and dry tear strength and stretch over the untreated sample (Table VI). The pulp heat treated at high pH has higher tear strength due to the protective action of the alkali which reduces the loss in fibre strength through acid hydrolysis. EXAMPLE 7 This example illustrates the effect of pulp bleaching or brightening agents on the wet-web and dryhandsheet strength of heat treated pulps. A 70% 'yield sulphite pulp was bleached by a conventional hydrogen peroxide treatment following the heat treatment at 150"C for 60 minutes and 20% consistency. Results are given in Table VII for the pulps after treatment with different peroxide charges and after a standard hot disintegration. The pulp after bleaching still possesses all the claimed superior properties (with the exception of drainage) resulting from the heat treatment done under the conditions disclosed in this invention. EXAMPLE 8 As a further example pulps have been heat treated in the way described earlier, with the addition of a brightening agent during the heat treatment stage. A thermomechanical pulp and a 708-yield sulphite TABLE VI THE EFFECT OF THE PULP FIBRE H DURING HEAT TREAThENT 70X yield sulphite pulp1 EMI33.1 <tb> <SEP> Heat <SEP> treated <SEP> pulp <SEP> at <SEP> 150 C <tb> <SEP> Untreated <SEP> for <SEP> 60 <SEP> minutes <SEP> and <SEP> 20% <tb> <SEP> pulp <SEP> hot <SEP> consistency <SEP> followed <SEP> by <tb> <SEP> disintegrated <SEP> hot <SEP> disintegration <tb> pH <SEP> of <SEP> heat <SEP> treatment <SEP> - <SEP> 3.2 <SEP> 10.0 <tb> Pulp <SEP> and <SEP> fibre <SEP> properties <tb> <SEP> Curl <SEP> index <SEP> 0.135 <SEP> 0.237 <SEP> 0.253 <tb> <SEP> CSP <SEP> (ml) <SEP> 643 <SEP> 610 <SEP> 672 <tb> 0.7 <SEP> kPa <SEP> solids <SEP> (%) <SEP> 25.4 <SEP> 22.1 <SEP> 26.7 <tb> <SEP> tensile <SEP> (m) <SEP> 103 <SEP> 89.5 <SEP> 67.8 <tb> <SEP> stretch <SEP> (Z) <SEP> 2.67 <SEP> 15.8 <SEP> 7.38 <tb> <SEP> work <SEP> to <SEP> rupture <SEP> 25.1 <SEP> 157 <SEP> 52.6 <tb> 103 <SEP> kPa <SEP> solids <SEP> (Z) <SEP> 29.0 <SEP> 28.2 <SEP> 29.4 <tb> <SEP> tensile <SEP> (m) <SEP> 169 <SEP> 141 <SEP> 103 <tb> <SEP> stretch <SEP> (2) <SEP> 2.54 <SEP> 9.61 <SEP> 6.19 <tb> <SEP> work <SEP> to <SEP> rupture <SEP> 34.4 <SEP> 142 <SEP> 67.0 <tb> Wet-Web <SEP> stretch <SEP> at <SEP> 2.89 <SEP> 13.5 <SEP> 6*24 <SEP> <tb> 100 <SEP> m <SEP> breaking <SEP> length <tb> Dry <SEP> handsheet <SEP> properties <tb> Bulk <SEP> (cm3/g) <SEP> 1.72 <SEP> 1.54 <SEP> 1.78 <tb> Burst <SEP> index <SEP> (kPa.m2/g) <SEP> 6.70 <SEP> 4.71 <SEP> 3.43 <tb> Tear <SEP> index <SEP> (mN.m2/g) <SEP> 8.15 <SEP> 9.78 <SEP> 16.41 <tb> Breaking <SEP> length <SEP> (m) <SEP> 9924 <SEP> 7383 <SEP> 5547 <tb> 2 <SEP> stretch <SEP> 2.89 <SEP> 3.03 <SEP> 2.99 <tb> Toughness <SEP> index <SEP> (iLl) <SEP> 167 <SEP> 137 <SEP> 107 <tb> Zero-span <SEP> b.l. <SEP> (km) <SEP> 16.38 <SEP> 14.95 <SEP> 14.35 <tb> Scattering <SEP> coeff. <SEP> (cm2/g) <SEP> 205 <SEP> 209 <SEP> 263 <tb> Tappi <SEP> opacity <SEP> (2) <SEP> 74.6 <SEP> 74.9 <SEP> 93.7 <tb> Iso-brightness <SEP> (x) <SEP> 44.4 <SEP> 43.0 <SEP> 21.5 <tb> Absorption <SEP> coeff. <SEP> (cm2/g) <SEP> 14.86 <SEP> 15.22 <SEP> 50.50 <tb> 1 Refined at 0.99 mJ/kg and 18% consistency TABLE VII (Sheet 1) THE EFFECT OF BLEACHING HEAT-TREATED PULPS 70% Yiels Sulphite Pulp1 After heat treatment at 150 C for Before Heat 60 minutes and 20% consistency Treatment followed by peroxide bleaching Weight of Peroxide on Pulp (%) - 0 0.5 1.0 2.0 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.138 0.227 0.216 0.209 0.204 CSF (ml) 662 607 583 533 524 Wet-Web Properties 0.7 kPa Solids (%) 27.4 23.3 22.9 25.0 22.7 Tensile (m) 91.8 87.7 92.2 93.7 95.9 Stretch (%) 2.19 15.1 12.8 14.0 16.5 Work to rupture 19.0 150 131 165 210 103 kPa Solids (%) 31.8 29.0 28.1 32.8 25.3 Tensile (m) 158 133 139 180 151 Stretch (%) 2.34 9.31 9.26 8.95 8.48 Work to rupture 36.4 148 150 171 162 Wet-Web stretch at 2.34 13.02 12.82 13.82 15.0 100 m breaking length (%) TABLE VII (Sheet 2) THE EFFECT OF BLEACHING HEAT-TREATED PULPS 70% Yield Sulphite Pulp1 After heat treatment at 150 C for Before Heat 60 minutes and 20% consistency Treatment followed by peroxide bleaching Dry Handsheet Properties Bulk (cm3/g) 1.74 1.54 1.53 1.47 1.49 Burst Index (kPa.m2/g) 6.73 4.50 4.70 5.23 5.18 Tear Index (mN.m2/g) 8.26 10.40 10.75 10.64 10.04 Breaking Length (m) 9422 6754 6814 7389 7302 Stretch (%) 2.79 3.26 3.43 3.50 3.48 Toughness Index (mJ) 159 143 148 170 163 Zero-span b.l. (km) 16.12 14.38 14.42 14.48 14.98 Scattering Coeff. (cm2/g) 208 211 206 196 198 Tappi Opacity (%) 76.3 76.8 61.5 68.7 66.4 Iso-Brightness (%) 44.8 42.1 49.3 52.9 56.6 Absorption Coeff. (cm2/g) 14.88 16.36 7.02 5.23 4.03 Visual Efficiency (%) 56.0 53.6 63.5 67.0 70.5 Printing Opacity (%) 86.0 86.6 69.6 77.0 73.7 1 Refined at 0.78 MJ/kg and 24% consistency pulp at about 30% consistency were sprayed with a solution of 2% H202, 0.4% EDTA, 3% Na2SiO3, 0.0058 MgS04, to bring it to 199 consistency. The pulps were treated at 1500C for 10 minutes. Results are given in Table VIII. Both pulps are higher in visual efficiency than the control and possess all the other desired superior properties. EXAMPLE 9 This example illustrates the effect of the heat treatment on bleached or brightened pulps. A 705 yield sulphite pulp and a thermomechanical pulp at about 30% consistency were sprayed with a solution of 25 H202, 0.48 EDTA, 3% Na2SiO3 and 0.005% MgSO4 to bring it to 19% consistency. The pulps reacted with the chemicals for one hour at 600C. Afterwards, the pulps were heat treated at 1500C for 10 minutes. Results are given in Table IX for the original pulps before heat treatment, the brightened pulps and for both pulps after heat treatment. The heat treatment, done under the conditions disclosed herein on the brightened pulp compared to the original pulp gave similar properties while it had higher visual efficiency. TABLE VIII (Sheet 1) THE EFFECT OF THE ADDITION OF A BRIGHTENING AGENT TO PULP DURING THE HEAT TREATMENT 70% YIELD SULPHITE PULP1 TMP2 Heat Treatment at Heat Treatment at 150 C, 10 min, 19% 150 C, 10 min, 19% consistency with consistency with 2% H2O2 2% H2O2 Before No 0.4% DETA Before No 0.4% EDTA Heat Bleaching 3% Na2SiO3 Heat Bleaching 3% Na2SiO3 Treatment Chemicals 0.005% MgSO4 Treatment Chemicals 0.005% MgSO4 Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.148 0.187 0.209 0.106 0.177 0.163 CSF (ml) 673 651 685 175 312 293 Wet-Web Properties 0.7 kPa Solids (%) 26.1 26.5 25.1 20.6 25.9 23.4 Tensile (m) 82.8 92.4 80.1 110 86.1 96.1 Stretch (%) 2.38 3.32 5.04 5.02 10.1 10.1 Work to rupture 20.3 32.0 43.7 68.4 117 122 103 kPa Solids (%) 29.1 32.5 32.1 25.0 32.3 29.3 Tensile (m) 143 147 127 167 144 150 Stretch (%) 1.95 2.53 3.49 4.42 8.22 7.24 Work to rupture 27.3 38.1 44.7 86.8 159 144 Wet-Web stretch at 100 m breaking length (%) 2.23 2.90 4.05 5.22 9.61 8.93 TABLE VIII (Sheet 2) THE EFFECT OF THE ADDITION OF A BRIGHTENING AGENT TO PULP DURING THE HEAT TREATMENT 70% YIELD SULPHITE PULP1 TMP2 Heat Treatment at Heat Treatment at 150 C, 10 min, 19% 150 C, 10 min, 19% consistency with consistency with 2% H2O2 2% H2O2 Before No 0.4% EDTA Before No 0.4% EDTA Heat Bleaching 3% Na2SiO3 Heat Bleaching 3% Na2SiO3 Treatment Chemicals 0.005% MgSO4 Treatment Chemicals 0.005% MgSO4 Dry Handsheet Properties Bulk (cm3/g) 1.81 1.65 1.79 2.79 3.10 2.96 Burst Index (kPa.m2/g) 6.24 5.78 4.38 2.02 1.36 1.50 Tear Index (mN.m2/g) 8.22 7.84 7.84 8.72 8.27 8.94 Breaking Length (m) 9704 9251 7361 3625 2469 2792 Stretch (%) 2.63 2.71 2.32 2.15 2.05 2.07 Toughness Index (mJ) 150 156 113 45 32 37 Zero-span b.l. (km) 16.45 16.23 13.96 11.20 9.78 10.47 Scattering Coeff. (cm2/g) 219 203 238 568 568 581 Tappi Opacity (%) 77.2 76.1 79.7 93.8 95.1 93.3 Iso-Brightness (%) 45.3 41.7 42.8 56.0 50.9 55.8 Absorption Coeff. (cm2/g) 14.68 15.10 9.22 20.23 20.49 9.83 Visual Efficiency (%) 56.6 54.3 60.4 67.3 64.4 71.2 Refined at 0.57 MJ/kg and 9% consistency Refined at 8.52 MJ/kg and 35% consistency after second stage TABLE IX. THE EFFECT OF THE HEAT TREATMENT ON BLEACHED OR BRIGHTENED PULPS (Sheet 1) 70% YIELD SULPHITE PULP1 (a) (b) Heat Treatment at Original Pulp 150 C, 10 min. Before Pulp (a) Original Brightened Heat Treatment Brightened Pulp (a) Pulp (b) Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.108 0.157 0.215 0.223 CSF (ml) 715 687 681 707 Wet-Web Properties 0.7 kPa Solids (%) 26.8 26.3 27.7 28.0 Tensile (m) 77.2 79.8 59.1 62.5 Stretch (%) 1.71 1.77 2.99 3.49 Work to rupture 14.5 12.0 20.3 23.6 103 kPa Solids (%) 33.5 31.5 29.2 30.5 Tensile (m) 160 119 100 89.4 Stretch (%) 1.63 1.73 2.49 2.84 Work to rupture 27.7 17.3 26.4 29.2 Wet-Web stretch at 100 m breaking length (%) 1.81 1.74 3.02 2.74 Dry Handsheet Properties Bulk (cm3/g) 1.87 1.80 1.68 1.80 Burst Index (KPa.m2/g) 6.09 6.17 5.01 4.35 Teat Index (mN.m2/g) 7.99 7.35 8.54 7.48 Breaking Length (m) 9054 10033 7675 7300 Stretch (%) 2.62 2.60 2.85 2.50 Toughness Index (mJ) 128 146 131 109 Zero-span b.l. (km) 15.68 16.39 15.43 13.80 Scattering Coeff. (cm2./g) 221 220 215 241 Tappi Opacity (%) 73.8 69.1 75.3 73.8 Iso-Brightness (%) 46.5 53.2 42.2 46.5 Absorption Coeff. (cm2/g) 13.79 4.90 13.85 6.14 Visual Efficiency (%) 57.9 68.9 55.2 65.2 Printing Opacity (%) 83.6 76.6 85.1 81.7 1 Refined at 0.50 MJ/kg and 15% consistency TABLE IX. THE EFFECT OF THE HEAT TREATMENT ON BLEACHED OR BRICHTENED PULPS (Sheet 2) TMP2 (a) Heat Treatment at Original Pulp (b) 150 C, 10 min. Before Pulp (a) Original Brightened Heat Treatment Brightened Pulp (a) Pulp (b) Pulp and Fibre Properties Curl Index 0.106 0.113 0.177 0.167 CSF (ml) 175 187 312 308 Wet-Web Properties 0.7 kPa Solids (%) 20.6 21.1 25.9 21.5 Tensile (m) 110 105 86.1 82.5 Stretch (%) 5.02 5.44 10.1 11.3 Work to urpture 68.4 71.9 117 114 103 kPa Solids (%) 25.0 27.5 32.3 26.4 Tensile (m) 167 157 144 129 Stretch (%) 4.42 4.75 8.22 8.38 Work to rupture 86.8 94.9 159 124 Wet-Web stretch at 100 m breaking length (%) 5.22 5.54 9.61 10.0 Dry Handsheet Properties Bulk (cm3/g) 2.79 2.78 3.10 2.94 Burst Index (KPa.m2/g) 2.02 2.07 1.36 1.43 Tear Index (mN.m2/g) 8.72 8.92 8.27 8.34 Breaking Length (m) 3625 3814 2469 2713 Stretch (%) 2.15 2.13 2.05 1.95 Toughness Index (mJ) 45 47 32 33 Zero-span b.l. (km) 11.20 11.08 9.78 9.92 Scattering Coeff. (cm2/g) 568 555 568 570 Tappi Opacity (%) 93.8 87.7 95.1 91.8 Iso-Brightness (%) 56.0 67.8 50.9 56.6 Absorption Coeff. (cm2/g) 20.23 3.91 20.49 8.95 Visual Efficiency (%) 67.3 81.1 64.4 72.0 Printing Opacity (%) 96.2 89.7 97.1 94.5 Among the features of the method for treating pulp fibres as described above which are preferred features and may be made the subject of further claims in this application are the following: 1. A method wherein the pulp fibres are lignocellulosic pulp fibres obtained after a single stage refining, or, after two successive refining, or, between two successive refining. 2. A method wherein the pulp fibres are lignocellulosic pulp fibres at neutral or alkaline pH. 3. A method wherein the pulp fibres are pulp fibres commercially produced under the designation of refiner mechanical-pulp, pressurised refiner mechani.cal pulp and thermomechanical pulp either from a single stage or two-stage refining. 4. A method wherein the pulp fibres are pulp fibres commercially produced under the designation of ultrahigh-yield pups, high-yield pulps, high-yield chemithermomechanical pulps, chemimechanical pulps, interstage thermomechanical pulps and chemically post ,treated mechanical or thermomechanical pulps. 5. A method wherein the pulp fibres are part of the furnish. 6. A method wherein the pulp fibres are the refined rejects in mechanical or high yield pulp production. 7. A method wherein the pulp fibres are whole pulps of the furnish. 8. A method including the step of incorporating a brightening agent during heat treatment, to upgrade the brightness while retaining the improved pulp properties. 9. A method including the subsequent steps of brightening or bleaching sequences to upgrade the brightness of the pulpswhile maintaining the improved pulp properties. 10. A method wherein the pulps are brightened pulps, thereby to maintain adequate brightness after heat treatment as well as the improved pulp properties.

Claims: CLAIMS: 1. A method for treating pulp fibres, that have already been curled which method comprises: sub jecting said pulp fibres to a heat treatment while said pulp is at a high consistency in dle form of nodules or entangled mass, thereby to render said curl permanent to subsequent mechanical action. 2. A method for treating pulp fibres, that have already been curled by a high consistency action, which method comprises: subjecting said pulp fibres to a heat treatment at a temperature of at least 100 'C, while said pulp is in the form of nodules or entangled mass at a consistency of at least 5% thereby to render said curl permanent to subsequent mechanical action. 3. A method for treating pulp fibres that have already been curled by a high consistency action, which method comprises: subjecting said pulp fibres to a heat treatment at a temperature of 100 C-170 C for a period of time of at least 2 minutes, while said pulp, in tlle form of nodules or entangled mass is at a consistency of at least 5%, preferably 15% or more, thereby to render said curl permanent to subsequent mechanical action. 4. The method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said heat treatment is carried out as a batch method, in a digester. 5. The method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said heat treatment is carried out as A continuous method through a steaming tube maintained at high pres sure. 6. The method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said pulp fibres are lignocellulosic pulp fibres produced by mechanical defibration. 7. The method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said pulp fibres are lignocellulosic pulp fibres produced by refining. 8. The method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said pulp fibres are lignocellulosic pulp fibres produced by refining in a disc refiner at high consistency, and/or in a device such as, but not exclusively, a "Curlator" or a "Frotopulper111 which introduces curl and kinks in the fibres. 9. The method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said pulp fibres are lignocellulosic pulp fibres produced by mechanical defibration of wood chips at high con sistency. 10. The method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said pulp fibres are lignocellulosic pulp fibres produced by mechanical defibration of wood chips at high con sistency followed or preceded by a chemical treat ment.

Inventors: BARBE, MICHEL, PAGE, DEREK H., SETH, RAJINDER S.
Applicants: PULP AND PAPER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CANADA
Application year: 1983
Main classification: D21C9
IPC codes: D21C9