NOVEL KILLER YEAST, PROCESS FOR ITS PRODUCTION, AND APPLICATION THEREOF

Abstract: A process for producing novel yeast, which comprises merely culturing budding cells from zygotes obtained by mating spores of diploid or higher polyploid homothallic yeast as parent strain with karyogamy mutant cells having a killer factor, and a process for brewing wine using the obtained yeast. The resulting yeast has the same polyploidy as parent strain and has a killer factor. The yeast-producing process is also useful for introducing genetic factors other than the killer factor present in cytoplasm without changing genetic character and polyploidy. The use of the killer yeast in brewing wine enables production of quality wine by depressing unfavorable stain by Saccharomyces bayanus.

Description: NOVEL KILLER.YEAST, PROCESS FOR CONSTRUCTING THE SAME, AND THE USE THEREOF Technical Field The present invention relates to a novel killer yeast, a process for its construction, and its use in wine making. More particularly, the invention relates to the construction of a useful yeast of homothallic strain into which a killer factor has been introduced, as well as wine making using that yeast. Background Art One of the problems that always bother producers of alcoholic beverages is contamination by unwanted microorganisms coming from the starting materials, the container and the atmosphere. In particular, differentiation between wild yeasts and useful yeasts is difficult to make by the environment, and the addition of a pure culture of useful strains as seeds does not eliminate the chance of contamination by wild yeasts, and this presents a great problem in quality control for the cellar master. For example, in wine making, 50 to 100 ppm of sulfites is added to the grape must in order to inhibit the growth of harmful wild yeasts and other microorganisms originating from the grape skins. The cellar master expects the sulfites to inhibit the growth of wild microorganisms while the useful yeast is growing. However, the sulfites added are not completely effective against the growth of undesired microorganisms. They are effective against "film-forming" yeasts of Hansenula and Pichia, but not against sulfide-resistant strains of Saccharomyces, which survive in the fermenting must and may contaminate the wine under aging or bottled wine. Pseudo-film forming yeast of Saccharomyces bayanus are particularly resistant to sulfites and they also have resistance to alcoholes. If some of these yeasts grow in the must or wine, they either give unpleasant taste or flavour or.start another fermentation which may lead to burst bottles. One common practice in wine making is to recover the useful yeast from the fermenting must and use it in the next cycle of fermentation. In this causdtVltw = ordinary wine yeasts are used, a mixture of the useful yeast and the undesired yeast of Saccharomyces having high resistance to sulfites and alcohol is formed in the later stage of fermentation. Because of the high resistance to alcohol of this contaminating yeast, repeated use of the recovered yeast results in the increased proportion of the contaminating yeast. Obviously, the use of such recovered yeast as seed is not recommendable from a viewpoint of the control over microorganisms in the winery A method has been proposed to produce Japanese sake and wine employing a useful yeast into which a killer factor has been introduced (see Japanese Patent Publication No. 2307/82). Accoridng to this method, the killer yeast is constructed by either (1) the backcross method or (2) the cytoduction method using a heterothallic yeast. However, the first method involves complicated procedures and needs many days to breed the desired yeast. Furthermore, it is difficult to restore completely the genetic traits governed by the nucleic genes possessed by the useful parent strain. The problem with the second method is its limited applicability to haploid yeasts which usually lack commercial infeasibility. Therefore, the principal object of the present invention is to provide a process for constructing a killer yeast which is free from the defects of the conventional technique. Disclosure of the Invention For constructing the desired killer yeast according to the present invention, it is essential that a completely homothallic yeast (see Reference 1 in the Bibliography at the end of this specification) be used as the useful yeast and that a karyogamy deficient mutant be used as the strain carrying killer factor. A killer factor cannot be introduced into a completely homothallic strain by the conventional method of mating. However, the present inventors noted that the spores of a completely homothallic yeast are of either a- or a-mating type and that after- two cell divisions, conversion of the mating type is caused, and the two types of cells mate each other to form a diploid. Based on these observations, the inventors proceeded with their research and finally accomplished the present invention. According to thetpresent invention, the spores of a useful homothallic yeast are mated with a killer yeast defective in nuclear fusion (karyogamy deficient mutant) before the homothallic spores undergo two cell divisions. By doing this, diploid or polyploid cells of the desired useful yeast having the killer factor and the nucleic genome only derived from the useful parent yeast can be constructed. Any diploid or polyploid yeast is suitable as the useful parent yeast if it has the homothallic mechanism. A suitable example is ATCC 32747. All karyogamy deficient mutants, such as JCXIP 24 (see Reference 2) may be used as the killer yeast. Adding non-sensitivity. or sensitivity to antibiotics to the killer yeast as a selective marker is preferred for facilitating the selection of the desired useful yeast to be bred. As shown in Example 1, the present invention successfully constructed a killer wine yeast by mating, through cytoduction, SY-5 yeast with a homothallic wine yeast SW-001 which has low settleability and high suspensibility, as well as high survival ratio in the later stage of fermentation. By using the so constructed killer yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae SAV-301) as a wine yeast, contamination of the fermenting must by undesired yeasts could be suppressed and wine with high quality could be made. By increasing the lethality of undesired microorganisms by the useful killer yeast, the present inventors recovered an adequate quantity of the yeast suspended in the supernatant of the fermenting must while avoiding the use of the settling yeast severely contaminated by pectin, proteins, tannin and coloring matter originating from the grape skins. As a result, not only the number of living cells in the recovered yeast but also the volume of the useful killer yeast could be increased to such an extent that the growth of harmful yeasts was effectively prevented. This method enabled continuous recovery of the desired yeast and simple preparation of seed yeast, and hence, wine of consistent quality could be made. The present invention provides the first commercial method for making quality wine by-repeatedly using the recovered useful yeast in fermentation of the grape must. , Wine making with a useful wine yeast having a killer factor introduced thereinto is already known (Japanese Patent Publication No. 2307/82). However, the killer yeast constructed by this prior art method has almost the same lethality after grape must fermentation as the ordinary wine yeast, and therefore, it is not highly recommended to recover this killer yeast and use it in repeated fermentation. The advantages of the present invention are hereunder described in greater detail by reference to non-limiting working examples Example 1: Construction of Killed Wine Yeast Diploid wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae SW-001 (2 ml) was cultured on a YPD medium containing 1% yeast extract, 2% polypeptone and 2% glucose by leaving the medium to stand at 300C, The culture was then placed on a spore-forming medium (0.5% potassium acetate and 2% agar) and cultured at 300C for 24 hours to form spores. Killer yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae SY-5 (a leu 1 Kar l-l[P]tEryr]) was cultured on a YPD medium for 24 hours. The spores of SW-001 strain and SY-5 cells were placed on a small YPD agar medium and under observation by a microscope, the two groups of cells were brought into contact with each other by manipulation of a thin glass rod (for the method of spore to cell mating, see Reference 3). After confirming that the spores fused to the cells under microscope, the small YPD agar medium was transferred to a YPD agar plate medium and cultured at 300C for 3 days until colonies formed. Cells from the colonies were picked up and cultured on a minimum nutrient medium (product of Difco, containing 3% glycerol and 0.67% yeast nitrogen base) combined with 100 pg/ml of erythromycin. Two independent matings were conducted on a 3% glycerol-erythromycin minimum medium, and 5 clones were collected from each cross, and subjected to tetrad analysis to see the killer-behavior of the clones. The result showed that killer yeast, SAV-301, having the desired SW-001 nucleic gene was constructed. The strain has been deposited with the Fermentation Research Institute, the Agency of Industrial Science & Technology, under FERM BP-261. The strains used in the matings and their microbiological data are identified in Table 1. Further analysis showed that the killer yeast (SAV-301) carried the same cytoplasmic M dsRNA and L dsRNA plasmids concerning expression of killer factor as those of SY-5 in their molecular weights. The killer spectrum of SAV-301 was identical with that of SY-5, as shown in Table 2. The mycological properties of SAv-301 (see Reference 4) were entirely the same as those of SW-001. The sugar fermentation data of these two strains is given in Table 3. Table 1 EMI5.1 <tb> Strain <SEP> SW-OOl <SEP> SAV-301 <SEP> SY-5 <tb> Nucleus <SEP> SW-001 <SEP> SW-001 <SEP> SY-5 <tb> Ploidy <SEP> 2n <SEP> 2n <SEP> in <SEP> <tb> Killer <tb> Erythromycin <SEP> S <SEP> R <SEP> R <tb> resistance <tb> Tetrad <SEP> analysis <tb> <SEP> leucine-requirement <SEP> 4+ <SEP> : <SEP> 0 <SEP> - <SEP> <SEP> 4+ <SEP> : <SEP> 0 <SEP> - <SEP> - <SEP> <tb> <SEP> homo <SEP> : <SEP> hetero <SEP> 4 <SEP> :- <SEP> 0 <SEP> 4 <SEP> : <SEP> 0 <SEP> - <SEP> <tb> Table 2 EMI6.1 <tb> <SEP> SW-001 <SEP> SAV-301 <SEP> SY-5 <tb> <SEP> a <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> b <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> c <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> d <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <SEP> <tb> e <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> f <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> g <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> h <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> i <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> i <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> k <SEP> t <SEP> + <SEP> <SEP> t <SEP> <tb> <SEP> 1 <SEP> - <SEP> + <SEP> + <SEP> <tb> a) Saccharomyces bayanus possessed by Suntory, Ltd. b) Saccharomyces beticus possessed by Suntory, Ltd. c) Saccharomyces oviformis possessed by Suntory, Ltd. d) Saccharomyces fermentati possessed by Suntory, Ltd. e) Saccharomyces -lactis possessed by Suntory, Ltd. f) Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kyokai No. 7 g) Saccharomyces willianus IFO-248 h) Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. eliipsoidenus IFO-251 i) Saccharomyces oviformis IFO-262 j) Saccharomyces cerevisiae IFO-304 k) Saccharomyces diastaticus IFO-1015 1) Saccharomyces diastaticus IFO-1046 Table 3 EMI6.2 <tb> <SEP> SAV-301 <SEP> SW-001 <tb> glucose <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> galactose <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> sucrose <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> maltose <SEP> + <SEP> + <SEP> <tb> lactose <tb> raffinose <SEP> + <SEP> + <tb> melibiose <tb> + fermented, -- not fermented Example 2: Growth Profile of Contaminants in Fermenting Must and Quality of Wine Bunches of grapes (variety: Koshu, 20 kg) were crushed, stripped of their stems and immediately pressed. to extract juice. The juice was supplemented with 100 ppm of potassium metabisulfite chaptilized to a sugar content of 20.2%, centrifuged and aseptically passed through an EK filter (product of Seitz-Werke GmbH). The filtered juice was put into sterilized fermentation vats To one vat, pure cultures of killer yeast SAV-301 and contaminating yeast Saccharomyces bayanus FB-1 were added (method A1 and. the juice was fermented at 20 C. To the other vat, pure cultures of wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae SW-001 and contaminant FB-l (method B) were added and the juice was also fermented at 20 C. In method A, the juice contained 2 x 1o6 cells/ml of SAV-301 and 2 x 105 cells/ml of FB-1. In method B, the juice contained 2 x 106 cells/ml of SW-O01 and 2 x 105 cells/ml of FB-1. On the 7th day of the fermentation, the number of SYinsg cells in each vat was counted. All the yeast cells present in the juice fermented by method A were those of the killer yeast, wherein 29.8% of the yeast cells present in the juice fermented by method B originated from contaminant yeast FB-1. The killer yeast was distinguished from the contaminant yeast by the resistance to erythromycin (100 g/ml) of the-colonies formed on a nutrient agar medium (the killer yeast was erythromycin-resistant but the contaminant yeast was not). To each sample-of the fermented juice, 300 ppm of potassium metabisulfite was' added, and the amounts of the free form and bound form of the sulfite were measured. The wine samples were also subjected to an organoleptic test by 11 panelists. These results are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4 EMI8.1 <tb> <SEP> < <SEP> Method <SEP> A <SEP> B <tb> ffimeterMethOd <SEP> A <SEP> B <tb> <SEP> A <SEP> B <tb> <SEP> free <SEP> sulfite <tb> <SEP> (mg/1,000 <SEP> ml) <SEP> 19 <SEP> 5 <tb> <SEP> bound <SEP> sulfite <SEP> 139 <SEP> 149 <tb> <SEP> (mg/1,000 <SEP> ml) <tb> <SEP> total <SEP> sulfite <SEP> 158 <SEP> 154 <tb> <SEP> (mg/1,000 <SEP> ml) <tb> The determination of free and bound sulfites was made in accordance with the Rankine method (1962) (see Reference 5). Table 5 EMI8.2 <tb> <SEP> Method <SEP> A <SEP> Method <SEP> B <SEP> to <SEP> Significant <tb> <SEP> difference <tb> Color <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 1.5 <SEP> 0.00 <tb> Aroma <SEP> 2.7 <SEP> 1.8 <SEP> 3.38 <SEP> * <SEP> * <tb> Flavor <SEP> 10.1 <SEP> 8.9 <SEP> 3.66 <SEP> * <SEP> * <tb> Total <SEP> 14.3 <SEP> 12.2 <SEP> 4.51 <SEP> * <SEP> * <tb> In the organoleptic test, the full score was 18 points consisting of 0'to 2 points for color, 0 to 4 points for aroma and 0 to 12 points for flavor. Table 4 shows that the juice fermented by method A contained a greater amount of the free sulfite than the juice fermented by method B. It is therefore concluded that method A would be more effective than method B in preventing oxidation and contamination by undesired microorganisms. In Table 5, ** indicates the presence of a significant difference at a probability of 0.01. The t distribution table shows that the value for two-tailed to .01 was 3.106 for 10 df. The t values for the tests of 0 aroma, flavor and overall evaluation were greater than 3.106. Therefore, it was concluded that there was a significant difference between the killer yeast of the present invention and the conventional wine yeast. As will be apparent from the above data, the wine made from the juice -fermented in the presence of killer yeast SAV-301 to inhibit the contaminating yeast was more prone to form free sulfite and smelled less of the unpleasant aldehyde. Example 3: Effectiveness of Killer Yeast Against Re-Fermentation To fresh Delaware grape juice (sugar content; 18.0%, acidity: 0.89%), glucose was added to increase the sugar content of 19.9%. The juice was fined by centrifuge and aseptically passed through a membrane filter (Millipore Limited). Five liter portions of the juice were transferred into two fermentation vats sterilized by dry heat. To one vat, a pure culture of killer yeast SAV-301 was added in an amount of 5% of the volume of the juice, and to the other vat, a pure culture of conventional wine yeast SW-001 was added in the same amount. The respective must samples were fermented at 200C. When the sugar content of the juice decreased to about 1.3%, the juice was cooled to stop the fermentation. After racking, filtration and fining, 70 ppm of sulfite was added to the juice, which was aseptically passed through a membrane filter (Millipore Limited) and transferred into two fermentation vats sterilized by dry heat. Wine was made from the must that had been fermented in the presence of killer yeast SAV-301, and 2 x 105 cells/100 ml of a pure culture of contaminating yeast Saccharomyces bayanus FB-1 were added to one sample of the wine, whereas 2 x 106 cells/100 ml of the same yeast were added to another sample. Wine was also made from the must that had been fermented in the presence of conventional wine yeast SW-001. To one sample, 2 x 105 cells/100 ml of a pure culture of FB-1 were added, and to antoher sample, 106 2 x 106 cells/100 ml of the same yeast were added. The four wine samples were left to stand at 200C to see if another fermentation would occur. The bacterial growth was observed by checking the turbidity of the wine with a spectrophotometer ("Spectronics 20A" of Shimazu-Bausch & BR< Lomb) at 660 nm. The resutls are shown in Table 6, from which one can see that the killer yeast of the present invention retarded the microbial growth more effectively than the conventional wine yeast and hence was more effective against re-fermentation. Table 6 EMI10.1 <tb> <SEP> Days <SEP> of <SEP> culture <tb> Conditions <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 7 <SEP> 10 <tb> <SEP> a <SEP> 0.02 <SEP> 0.122 <SEP> 0.395 <SEP> 0.733 <tb> <SEP> b <SEP> 0.02 <SEP> 0.230 <SEP> 0.469 <SEP> 0.809 <tb> <SEP> c <SEP> 0.01 <SEP> 0.02 <SEP> 0.151 <SEP> 0.767 <tb> <SEP> d <SEP> 0.01 <SEP> 0.02 <SEP> 0.282 <SEP> 0.864 <tb> The culture conditions a to d were as follows: : EMI10.2 <tb> <SEP> Cell <SEP> count <SEP> Sample <tb> <SEP> wine <SEP> made <SEP> from <SEP> the <SEP> must <tb> a <SEP> 2 <SEP> x <SEP> 10 <SEP> <SEP> cells/100 <SEP> ml <SEP> fermented <SEP> in <SEP> the <SEP> presence <tb> <SEP> of <SEP> killer <SEP> yeast <SEP> SAV-301 <tb> b <SEP> 2 <SEP> x <SEP> 106 <SEP> cells/100 <SEP> ml <SEP> control <tb> c <SEP> 2 <SEP> x <SEP> 105 <SEP> cells/100 <SEP> ml <SEP> fermented <SEP> in <SEP> the <SEP> presence <tb> <SEP> of <SEP> killer <SEP> yeast <SEP> SAV-301 <tb> d <SEP> 2 <SEP> x <SEP> 105 <SEP> <SEP> cells/100'ml <SEP> control <tb> Example 4: Effect of Killer Yeast on Continuous Fermentation ¯Bunches of grapes (variety: Koshu, 2 kg) were crushed, stripped of their stems and immediately pressed to extract juice. The juice was supplemented with 100 ppm of potassium metabisulfite, chaptalized to a sugar content of 21.6%, centrifuged to remove any turbidity, and aseptically passed through an EK filter (product of Seitz Werke GMBH). The filtered juice was put into sterilized fermentation vats. To one vat, pure cultures of killer yeast SAV-301 and contaminating yeast Saccharomyces bayanus FB-1 were added (method A), and the juice was fermented at 200C. To the other vat, pure cultures of wine yeast SW-001 and contaminant FB-1 were added (method B), and the juice was also fermented at 200C. In method A, the must contained 4 x 10 cells/ml of SAV-301 and 4. x 10 cells/ml of FB-1. In method B, the must contained 4 x 106 cells/ml of SW-OO and 4 x 10 cells/ml of FB-1. -( When the sugar content of each must became about 1%, the yeasts were recovered from the must. Grape juice was prepared in the same manner as used above, and 4 x 106 cells/ml of the respective recovered yeasts and 4 x 105 cells/ml of a pure culture of FB-1 were added to the juice, and the must was fermented at 200C. The same procedure was used in another cycle of fermentation. The proportions of killer yeast SAV-301 and contaminant yeast FB-1 that survived in the respective stages of fermentation are shown in Table 7. Almost all of the living cells in the must that underwent the three cycles of fermentations according to method A originated from the killer yeast, and the growth of the contaminating yeast was negligible. On the other hand, 80.5% of the living cells in the must fermented according to method B originated from the contaminant yeast. The grape juice is usually fermented unaseptically. The above results show that even in this case, the cells of a recovered yeast containing the killer yeast of the present invention can be continuously used as seeds in fermentation of the grape must. Table 7 EMI12.1 <tb> <SEP> Method <SEP> A <SEP> B <tb> <SEP> killer <SEP> contami- <SEP> wine <SEP> contami <tb> <SEP> yeast <SEP> yeast <SEP> nating <SEP> yeast <SEP> nating <tb> <SEP> SAV-301 <SEP> yeast <SEP> FB-1 <SEP> SW-001 <SEP> yeast <SEP> FB-1 <tb> Immediately <tb> after <SEP> the <SEP> <SEP> , <SEP> <tb> first <SEP> addition <SEP> 90.9% <SEP> 9.1% <SEP> 90.9% <SEP> 9.1% <tb> of <SEP> recovered <tb> yeast <tb> <SEP> Lethality <SEP> 5.0% <SEP> 8.0% <tb> Immediately <tb> after <SEP> the <SEP> 90.8% <SEP> -9.28 <SEP> | <SEP> 70.2% <SEP> 29.8% <tb> second <tb> addition <tb> Lethality <SEP> 8.0% <SEP> 15.0% <tb> Immediately <tb> after <SEP> the <SEP> 99.9% <SEP> 0.1% <SEP> 19.5% <SEP> 80.5% <tb> third <SEP> addition <tb> Lethality <SEP> 10.0% <SEP> 20.0% <SEP> <tb> Example S: Continuous Fermentation with Killer-Yeast in Unsterilized Juice Bunches- of grapes (variety: Koshu, 15Q kg) werecrushed, stripped of their stems and immediately pressed to extract juice The juice was supplemented with 100 ppm of sulfite, chaptalized to a sugar content of 22%,. centrifuged to obtain a clear must. A pure culture of killer yeast SAV-301 was added to the must in an amount of 4% on the basis of the volume of the must. The must was fermented at 20 C. When the sugar content was reduced to about 1%, the supernatant was centrifuged to recover the yeast. Another sample of the must was prepared in the same manner as above, and 4 x 106 cells/ml of the recovered yeast were added to this must which was then fermented at 20 CC. The same procedure was repeated five times and the yeast was recovered. No typical contaminant yeast Saccharomyces bayanus was detected in the recovered yeast. Bibliography: (1) Takano, I., Oshima, Y : Genetics, 65, 421 (1970) (2) J. Conde and G. R. Fink: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73, 3651 (1976) (3) Takano, I., Oshima, Y.: Genetics, 57: 875 (1967) (4) Lodder: The Yeasts, 2nd edd. (1970) (5) Rankine: Aust., Wine, Brew. & Spir. Rev., 80 (5) 14

Claims: Claims: 1. Yeast SAV-301 of Saccharomyces serevisiae. 2. A method of constructing a killer yeast comprising fusing a karyogamy deficient mutant yeast harboring killer plasmids to the spore produced by meiosis of a diploid or polyploid homothallic yeast and selecting the desired cells from those cells which bud from the fused cells. 3. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the homothallic yeast is a homothallic yeast used in the fermentation for making alcoholic beverages. 4. A method according to Claim 2 or 3 wherein saidhomothallic yeast is a wine yeast SW-001 and the karyogamy deficient mutant yeast having a killer yeast is SY-5. 5. A method of making wine characterized by using a killer yeast constructed by first fusing a karyogamy deficient mutant yeast harboring killer plasmids to the spore produced by meiosis of a diploid or polyploid homothallic yeast and selecting the desired cells from those cells which bud from the fused cells. 6. A method according to Claim 5 wherein the killer yeast is SAV-301. 7. A method according to Claim 5 or 6 where the yeast that is recovered from the must after one or more cycles of fermentation is used as the seed yeast.

Inventors: MIYAJIMA, KEIJI, OHSHIMA, TAKEHIRO, TOUJOU, KAZUMOTO D5-203, 4
Applicants: SUNTORY LIMITED
Application year: 1983
Main classification: C12N1
IPC codes: C12N15, C12G1, C12N1