CHAIN SAWS AND CHAINS THEREFOR

Abstract: A chain saw having a bar (51) with a sprocket (50) rotatably mounted in the nose, and a chain with cutter links (52) mounted to travel along the periphery of the bar (51). The driving tongues (54) of the chain and the gullets (50a) between the teeth of the sprocket (50) being shaped so that when they interfit as the chain passes around the nose of the bar, the rear end (6) of each cutter link (52) is raised relative to cutting edge (67) so that said rear end (6) follows a path about the sprocket (50) outwardly of the path travelled by the cutting edge (67).

Description: CHAIN SAWSANDCHAINSTHEREFOR * * This invention relates to chain saw bars and to a chain for use in combination with such a bar. 5 The invention is particularly directed to a chain saw bar of the type having a sprocket or a roller rotatably supp¬ orted at the forward end of the bar, to guide the chain as it travels from the top to the bottom edge of the bar. Chain saw bars of these constructions are commonly referred to as 10 "sprocket nose bars" and "roller nose bars" respectively. Throughout this specification the reference to a "chain saw chain" means a chain comprising a plurality of al¬ ternate cutter links and connector links with drive links connecting each cutter link to the respective adjacent conn- 15 ector links. Each drive link is a single member located cent¬ rally of the width of the chain, and has a dependent tongue to be received between successive teeth of a driving sprock¬ et. The cutting links each comprise a body portion with trans¬ verse apertures for pivotally connecting the cutter link to 20 the respective adjoining drive -links, and a transverse land integral with the body portion having a cutting edge at the forward end and a heel at the rearward end. A depth gauge projection is provided forward of the cutting edge. One of the major problems associated with the use of a chain saw is the tendency of the saw to kick back towards the operator, when the section of the chain passing around the nose of the bar is being used to cut material. In these circum- stances, the reaction force to the cutting action of the chain tends to throw the nose end of the bar upwardly and backwardly towards the operator. Hence the saw tends to pivot in this dir¬ ection in the hands of the operator, and may come into contact with the body of the operator, and cause serious injury there- to. The degree of severity of kick back is relative to the depth of cut being made by that portion of the chain travell¬ ing around the nose of the bar. In a conventional chain, the depth of cut is controlled by the depth gauge protection on the cutter link in advance of the cutting edge. If the depth gauge projection was set so that a relatively small cut is made by each cutter link, the severity of kick back would be reduced. However, this would also result in a reduction of the cutting rate of the chain when being used on the straight por¬ tion of the cutter bar and is therefore undesirable. In addition, the depth gauge projection on a conven¬ tional chain, can induce a degree of kick back, for as the chain passes around the curved nose portion of the bar, the depth gauge projection take up an attitude to the surface of the cut, which will allow the depth gauge projection to dig into the material in a manner similar to the cutting edge. This digging in of the depth gauge projection produces the same type of reaction as the cutting edge of the cutter link, and so also contributes to the risk of kick back. Further as the cutter link undergoes changes in angular attitude to the cut surface of the material, as it passes around the nose por¬ tion of the bar, the cutting edge of the cutter link may take a deeper cut than is possible when the chain is moving along the straight portion of the bar. Thus, at present, it is necessary to make a compromise between the acceptable rate of cutting when operating on the straight portion of the bar, and the degree of safety required when cutting with the nose portion of the bar. Skilled operators of chain saws are aware of the ten¬ dency for the saw to kick back, and accordingly take precaut¬ ions to guard against possible injury, when using the nose por¬ tion of the bar for cutting. However, there are other occas- ions when the nose portion of the chain may accidentally come in contact with an object that offers resistance to the cutt¬ ing action of the cutter link and therefore kick back may occur when the operator is not prepared. Also it will be app¬ reciated that risk of kick back and resultant serious injury are always present when a chain saw is being used by an un¬ skilled operator. It is the object of the present invention to provide a chain saw bar, and a chain saw chain which will eliminate or at least reduce the risk of kick back when cutting with the nose portion of the bar, without sacrificing the cutting effic¬ iency when cutting with the chain on the straight portion of the bar. With this object in view there is provided a chain saw including a chain saw chain as hereindefined supported on a chain saw bar to travel about the periphery thereof, the nose portion of the bar and the chain being adapted to co-operate in use so that portion of the transverse land of the cutter link rearward of the cutting edge travels a path radially out- ward of, or the same as, the path travelled by the cutting edge of the cutter link. It will be appreciated that if a portion of the cutter link rearward of the cutting edge travels a path radially out¬ ward of that travelled by the cutting edge, as it is travell- ing around the nose of the bar then the cutting edge will not contact the material being cut. Also as the depth gauge projec¬ tion of the cutter link travels a path inward of that of the cutting edge it- will be clear of the material, and will there¬ fore not promote kick back. In a conventional cutter link the surface of the trans¬ verse land, rearward of the cutting edge is inclined downward¬ ly from the cutting edge to the heel to provide clearance when the cutter link is travelling on the straight portion of the bar. Accordingly the degree that the rear end of the cutting link is required to be raised to follow a path around the nose of the bar outwardly of that of the cutting edge is influenced by the inclination of the said surface. Also the length of the transverse land rearward of the cutting edge influences the de¬ gree that the rear end must be raised to meet the above re- quire ent. The greater the length of the transverse land the closer the heel of the land will normally be to the arcuate path travelled by the cutting edge as the chain passes around the nose of the bar. Accordingly the greater the length of the transverse land, for any selected angle of downward inclinat- ion of the transverse land, the less is the degree that the cutter link must be deflected from its normal attitude so as to cause the heel of the transverse land to travel a path the same as or radially outward of the cutting edge. In a conventional sprocket nose chain saw bar the chain is supported by the sprocket as it passes around the nose of the bar, with the links of the chain clear of the bar. Thus there is no frictional drag between the chain and bar in the nose area, and as the sprocket is normally mounted on a roller bearing, frictional drag and hence wear are substant¬ _ .- . . - - - - - - - - 5 - ially avoided. -- " The only driving forces exerting between the nose sprocket and the chain is that necessary to cause the sprocket to rotate on its bearing, accordingly as is customary in a con 5 ventional chain the common centerline of the connecting rivets of each link is at its mid-point at right-angles to a radial line from the centre of the sprocket. Thus the cutter link as it passes around the nose will, in a conventional chain and sprocket construction have substantially the same attitude to 10 the material to be cut, as the cutter link has when travelling along the straight edges of the bar. However, if the links of the chain are constructed so that, as the chain passes around the nose sprocket, the common centerline of the rivets of the cutter links is inclined down- 15 ward in the forward direction of travel to the radial line through the mid-point of said common centerline, then the heel of the cutter link is raised and may travel the same path as the cutting edge or a path outwardly thereof. In this way the risk of kick back is reduced. 20 However, in a convention construction the cutter links are not directly supported by the sprocket but are suspended between the drive links connected to either end thereof. The attitude of the cutter link as it passes around the sprocket is thus controlled by the drive links that are directly supp- 25 orted by the sprocket. In one embodiment of the invention applicable to a sprocket nose chain saw co-operating surfaces on the drive link tongues of the chain and in the gullets between the teeth of the nose sprocket are arranged so that as the chain passes 30 around the nose sprocket the cutter links are inclined down¬ ward in the forward direction so that the heel or another por¬ tion of the transverse land rearward of the cutting edge there¬ of travels the same arcuate path as the cutting edge or out¬ ward of that path. 35 The co-operating surfaces of the driving tongues of the chain and of the gullet between the teeth of the nose sprocket are arranged so that as the chain passes around the nose sprocket the cutter links are inclined downward in the forward direction, said downward inclination of the cutter link being equal to or greater than the extent of inclination necessary to locate the transverse land of the cutter link rearward of the cutting edge to form a chord to a circle con¬ centric with the sprocket. When the inclination of the cutter link is such that said transverse land forms a chord to the circle then the for¬ ward end of the cutting edge and the rear end or heel of the transverse land are each located on the circumference of the circle. In this position the cutting edge will not effectively cut. If the inclination of the cutter link is greater than that necessary to form the chord to the circle, then the rear end of the transverse land will lie outside of the circumfer¬ ence of the circle passing through the forward end of the cutt- ing edge and concentric with the sprocket. Thus in any such position the heel of the transverse land is moving In a circle of greater radius than the cutting edge and the cutting edge will not effectively cut. By relating the inclination of the cutter link to the chord of the circle this ensures that subsequent sharpening of the cutting edge does not adversely affect the non kick back characteristic of the saw. If the transverse land rearward of the cutting edge does form a true chord to the circle when the chain is new, subsequent sharpening of the cutting edge will bring that edge inside of the circle. However, irrespective of the degree of sharpening the heel of the transverse land will remain on the circle. Thus sharpening only further reduces the risk of kick back. The raising of the portion of the cutter link rearward of the cutting edge with respect to the cutting edge thereof, as the cutter link passes around the nose of the chain saw bar may be achieved by making the gullet or driving tongue symmet¬ rical and the other asymmetrical. When the gullet is symmetric¬ al the trailing face of the asymmetrical tongue is more steep- ly inclined, and when the driving tongue is symmetrical the leading face of the gullet is more steeply inclined. It will be appreciated that if desired both the gull¬ ets in the sprockets and the driving tongues of the chain may be asymmetric and provided the degree of asymmetry is differ- ent and sufficient to incline the cutter link inwardly the nec¬ essary amount as the cutter links pass around the nose sprock¬ et. In this specification the asymmetry or symmetry of a nose sprocket gullet is determined in respect to a radial line from the axis of the sprocket passing through the centre of the root of the gullet. Also the asymmetry or symmetry of a driving tongue is determined in respect to a line passing through the centre of the crest of the tongue and at right angles to the common centerline of the two pivot pin receiving apertures of the driving tongue. The drive links may also be constructed to achieve the required inclination of the cutter link, by retaining the mat¬ ing faces of the drive tongue and the gullet of the sprocket teeth symmetrical or of conventional configurations and arrang¬ ing the common centerline of the connecting rivets of the drive link inclined outwardly in the forward direction to the line bisecting the angle between the leading and trailing in¬ clined faces of the drive link. With the drive links so con- structed the common centerline of the drive links rivets is outwardly inclined in the forward directions as they pass around the nose supported on the sprocket, and this results in the common centerline of the cutter link rivets to be inwardly inclined in the forward direction. The included angle between the leading and trailing faces of the drive tongue of conventional chains, varies be¬ tween manufacturers, and between different chains in the range of one manufacturer. However, it is the standard practice for the trailing face of the tongue of the drive link to be inclin- ed at an angle of 50 to the common centerline passing through the rivets of the drive link which connect it to the adjacent links of the chain. This inclination of the trailing face has been commonly accepted as the preferred angle to obtain effect¬ ive driving engagement between the drive sprocket of the saw and the drive links of the chain. It is also the widely accept¬ ed practice for the included angle between adjacent teeth on the nose sprocket to be in the order of 85° as this has been found to accommodate most of the normal chains currently in use. The teeth of the nose sprocket are also symmetrically arranged so that the bar may be reversed in the saw. It will be appreciated that currently the principle purpose of the nose sprocket Is to guide the chain around the nose area, with the links of the chain clear of the guide bar itself, and thus reduce the frictional drag on the chain. Also as there is an insignificant drive force acting between the nose sprocket and the tongues of the drive links, correct mat¬ ing of the tongues with the gullet between the sprocket teeth is not essential. In view of this standard form of the teeth on the nose sprocket, It has been realised that, by an appropriate arrange¬ ment of the disposition of the rivets passing through the drive l nk, a chain can be produced which will operate with most currently used guide bars in a manner to produce a reduct- ion in kick back. There is thus provided a chain for a chain saw wherein the line bisecting the angle between the forward and trailing faces of the drive link intersects the common centerline to the rivets passing through the drive link, at an angle less than 90°. This angle of inclination of the bisecting line is measured between the bisecting line inward of the common cen¬ terline and the common centerline rearward of the bisecting line. Preferably the angle is of the order of to 86°, how¬ ever, the angle may be as low as about 78°. The extent that the inclination of the bisecting line is below 90° is influ¬ ence by any asymmetre of the teeth of the nose sprocket. The important feature is that when the chain is fitted to the nose sprocket the common centerline between the rivets of the drive link is upwardly inclined In the forward direction relative to the radial line from the sprocket center to the mid-point of the common centerline of the drive link rivets. It Is convenient to make the angle between the forward and trailing faces of the drive tongue to be of the order of 85 so as to correspond to the included angle between the teeth of the conventional nose sprocket. However, the present invention does significantly contribute to the reduction in kick back even where the drive tongue and sprocket teeth do not neatly interfit. The invention will be more readily understood from the following description of various practical arrangements of a chain saw and chain as depicted in the accompanying drawings. In the drawings: Figure 1 is a perspective of a cutter link of a chain for a chain saw. Figures 2 and 3 are diagrammatic representations of factors contributing to kick back in the operation of a chain saw, and how it may be avoided. Figure 4 is a side view of the nose sprocket for a chain saw adapted to operate in accordance with the invention. Figure 5 is a side view of portion of a chain for a chain saw adapted to operate in accordance with the invention on a 'hard nose' or 'roller nose' chain saw bar. Figures 6 and 7 are side views of a sprocket nose bar for a chain saw, partly in section, with a chain fitted there¬ to to operate in accordance with the invention. Figures 8a and 8b are side views of a drive link for a chain, Figure 8a showing a conventional drive link, and Figure 8b showing a drive link modified In accordance with the pres- ent invention. Figure 9 is a side view of portion of the chain as shown in Figures 6 and 7 to a larger scale. Figure 10 is a side view of a cutter link for a chain modified in accordance with the present invention. Referring first to Figures 1 and 2 of the drawings, a conventional cutter link as Illustrated has a generally planar body portion 10, having two rivet receiving apertures 11 exten¬ ding therethrough. Integral with the body portion 10 is the land portion 12 extending transversely to the body portion. The forward end of the transverse land forms a cutting edge 13 which also extends at 13a into the body portion 10. Spaced for- wardly of the cutting edge 13 is a depth gauge projection 14 formed integral with the body portion 10. As can be best seen In Figure 2 the rivet receiving ap- ertures 11 are located on a common centerline 15 and the cutt¬ ing edge 13 is spaced from the centerline 15 a greater dist¬ ance than is the upper extremity 14a of the depth gauge projec¬ tion 14. The depth of cut that would be made by the cutter link when moving along a straight portion of a chain saw bar is the difference in height between the extremity 14a and the cutting edge 13, Indicated as "A" in Figure 2. The upper surface of the transverse land portion 12 is substantially flat, and is inclined downwardly from the cutt¬ ing edge 13 to the heel 16 at an angle B. This provides clear¬ ance immediately behind the cutting edge 13 to assist In the cutting, action. When this cutter link is incorporated in a con¬ ventional chain, and the chain is supported on the curved nose portion of a chain saw bar of prior known construction, the cutting edge 13 would follow the arcuate path indicated at P-, having a center S-,. As can be seen both the extremity 14a of the depth gauge projection 14 and the heel 16 are spaced in¬ wardly from path P., , so the cutting edge 13 would engage the material to be cut as it passes around the nose of the bar and cutting would occur. Since the cutting edge is effecting cutt¬ ing then the risk of kick back is present. Referring now to Figure 3 of the drawings there is shown the same cutter link as illustrated in Figure 2 but pos¬ itioned so that the common centerline 15 of the rivet receiv- in aperture 11 is inclined downwardly in the forward direct¬ ion to the radial line L, rom the axis S^. to the mid-point of the common centreline 15- It will be noted that, as a re¬ sult of the repositioning of the cutter link, the heel 16 of the cutter link is now located outwardly of the path P., of the cutting edge 13 • Accordingly as the cutter link passes around the nose of the bar the heel 16 will engage the material to be cut and the cutting edge 13 will be held clear of the mater¬ ial. It will also be noted that the extremity 14a of the depth gauge projection 14 will be clear of the material. The Inclining of the cutter link as above described thus eliminates the risk of kick back arising from the cutting action of the cutting edge 13 or from the depth gauge project¬ ion digging into the material to be cut. The degree of inclination of the cutter link to ach¬ ieve this result is related to the inclination of the upper face of the transverse land 12 as represented by angle "B" in Figure 2, and the distance the transverse land extends rear¬ ward of the rear rivet hole 11 in the cutter link, as indicat¬ ed at C in Figure 2. The greater angle B the greater is the re- quired inclination of the cutter link to the radial line L, , and the greater the length C the less is the required inclinat ion to line L-, . Also the smaller the radius of the path P.. the small is the degree of inclination of the cutter link required. It will be appreciated from the above description with respect to Figure 3 that the locating of the heel 16 of the transverse land 12 outwardly of the arcuate path P- may also be achieved solely by increasing the distance C. Such an exten¬ sion of the transverse land 12 is shown in broken outline at 16a in Figures 1 and 2. The degree of extension of the trans¬ verse land 12 required to locate the heel outwardly of the path P-, is increased with increase in the angle B. As an alter¬ native to increasing the distance C the transverse land 14 may be provided with an outward projection 18 as shown in Figure 1. This projection reduces the degree of outward inclination of the cutter link required to prevent kick back. It is suffic¬ ient for the outer extremity of the projection 18 to be out¬ ward of the arcuate path P., of the cutting edge when the cutt¬ er link passes around the nose of the bar. A further factor that determines the degree that the cutter link must be inclined or the transverse land extended in order to locate the heel outwardly of the path P- is the radius of the nose of the bar. As the radius of the nose de¬ creases the degree of inclination of the cutter link, or exten- ,sion of the transverse land required decreases. Figure 4 of the drawings illustrates a modification to a conventional sprocket so that the cutter link will be inclin¬ ed as above discussed as it passes around the nose of the bar. In this construction the plate 20 is secured to one side of the sprocket 21, and if desired a similar plate may be secured to .the other side. The sprocket 21 is of conventional construc¬ tion having a plurality of equally spaced teeth 22 to co-oper¬ ate with the drive tongues of the chain in the normal manner. The peripheral surface of the plate 20 has a series of flat faces 24, one flat face associated with each tooth 22 of the sprocket. Each flat face 24 is inclined inwardly in the forward direction to the radial line 23 from the sprocket centre through the crest of the associated tooth. In use the sprocket and plate are assembled to the bar of a chain saw to rotate about an axis normal to , the plane of the bar, and so that each face 24 is inclined inwardly In the forward direction of the rotation of the sprocket. The degree of inclination is such that, when a chain is in operating relation on the sprocket and plate, each cutter link is supported on a flat face 24 so the heel of the link is on the same or outwardly of the arcu¬ ate path of the cutting edge in the manner previously discuss¬ ed. It is to be understood that in this particular con¬ struction the form of the teeth of the sprocket, or of the drive link tongues of the chain are not important. The support¬ ing of the cutter links on the inwardly inclined faces 24 is the feature which achieves the avoidance of kick back, and the sprocket may be omitted if desired. In the construction as illustrated a flat face on the plate is provided to associate with each tooth of the sprock¬ et, however, as only each alternate tooth co-operates with a cutter link of the chain it is only essential for the plate to have a flat face associated with each alternate tooth of the sprocket. This later construction may result In the chain being incorrectly fitted so that the cutter links co-operate with the teeth without associated flat faces on the plate. When so assembled there would be an increase in the risk and severity of kick back rather than a reduction. Accordingly it is preferrable for the plate to provide one flat face in assoc¬ iation with each sprocket tooth. The type of construction may be used above described with reference to Figure 4 in conjunction with a bar of the construction disclosed in P.C.T. application No. AU83/00021 may be used. Illustrated in Figure 5 is a chain for a chain saw which has been modified in accordance with the present invent¬ ion to operate In conjunction with a conventional "hardnose" or "roller nose" bar. * A conventional "hardnose" bar is one wherein the nose is integral with the remainder of the bar, and is of a gener¬ ally semi—circular shape to guide the chain from the top edge to the bottom edge of the bar. The central groove in the top and bottom edges of the bar to receive the tongues of the drive links continues around the edge of the nose. A conventional "roller nose" bar is one wherein the nose is in the form of a roller rotatably supported on the re- mainder of the bar so the chain is supported on and guided by portion of the periphery of the roller as the chain passes from the top edge to the bottom edge of the chain. The roller has a central peripheral groove aligned with the grooves in the top and bottom edges of the bar to receive the drive link tongues. The general construction of the chain shown in Figure 5 is conventional, comprising cutter links 25, pivotally conn¬ ected at each end to respective drive links 26 by rivets 27. Each drive link is connected to the next adjacent drive link by a connector link 28, and rivets 29. Each drive link is a single member and each connector link 28 is a pair of members 30, each of the same shape, and located on opposite sides of the drive links. Each cutter link 25 comprises a member 33. the general construction of which is as described with refer- ence to Figure 1, and a tie strap 34 of the same shape as the members 33 of the connector link 28. In a conventional chain the lower edge of the members 30 of the connector link and the lower edge of the member 33 and tie strap 34 of the cutter link, each have a central con- toured portion 35. This contoured portion is provided to re¬ duce the area in contact with the bar and hence reduce the friction drag. (In Figure 5 the conventional shape of the low¬ er edge of the cutter link and tie strap is shown in broken outline) . In accordance with the present invention the lower edge of the member 33 and of the tie strap 34 of the cutter link have a concave shaped portion 36 which is offset towards the forward end 37 of the cutter link. The radius of the con¬ cave portion 3 is substantially the same as the radius of the nose portion of the bar or the nose roller on which the chain is used. As this chain passes around the nose portion of the bar the cutter link will tilt downwardly at the forward end as the concave portion 3 mates with the nose portion of the bar. The degree of offset of the center of the curvation of the concave portion 36 from the center of the cutter link, as indicated at D, is selected so that the cutter link will tilt to an extent so the heel 39 of the cutter link is on the same path as the cutting edge 40 or outwardly of that path as it passes around the nose of the bar. As previously described this relationship between the paths of the heel and cutting edge avoid kick back from the cutting edge or depth gauge pro¬ jection digging into the material being cut. Referring now to Figures 6 and 7, there is shown a chain and the complementary nose portion of a sprocket nose bar of a chain saw embodying the present invention. The chain saw bar 51 is of a conventional construction, being partly in section at the nose end to show the internal nose sprocket 50 and the chain passing therearound. The bar 51 is provided with a conventional longitudinal extending edge grooves 51a on the top and bottom surfaces thereof to receive the drive link tongues 54 of the chain, with the cutter links and connector links of the chain riding on the edges of the bar on opposite . sides of the respective grooves 51a. The nose sprocket 50 is of the conventional form and is rotatable supported on the stationary boss 52 secured by the plurality of rivets 53 to the bar 51. A series of rollers 53 are interposed between the sprocket 50 and the boss 52 to provide the support for the sprocket. This bearing construct- ion is conventional in a number of chain saw bars. The sprocket 50 is of a conventional type having even¬ ly spaced teeth 50a of symmetrical form which provide between adjacent teeth, gullets 50b, again of symmetrical form. The symmetry of the teeth and gullets of the sprocket is in res- pect of radial lines passing through the axis 52a of the sprocket and the centre point of the crest of the teeth and of the root of the gullets respectively. As can be best seen at 'D' in Figure 6 the cutter link 62 has a face 60 extending rearwardly from the cutting edge 67. The face 60 is inclined Inwardly towards the rear relative to the common centerline 65 of the rivets 69 at an angle 'B', to provide clearance when cutter link is cutting. In order to reduce the risk of kick back it is present¬ ly proposed to tilt the cutter link as it passes around the nose sprocket as indicated at 'E' . The degree of tilt is such that the face 60 forms a chord to the circle 63 described by the cutting edge of the cutter link as it passes around the sprocket. Thus the face 60 is at right angles to the radial lines 52c with the forward end of the cutting edge 67 and the rear end 6 of the face 60 both lying on the circle 63. Subse¬ quent sharpening of the cutting edge will result in the cutt¬ ing edge moving inwardly of the circle 63 (as shown in dotted outline) and hence further reduces the risk of kick back. It is to be understood that the circle 63 is determined when the chain is in the new condition prior to any resharpening. The tilt or inclination of the cutter link required to locate the face 60 in the chordal relation to the circle 63 is as previously discussed related to the angle 'B 1 and the length of the face 60 rearward of rear rivet 69. The kick back reduction effects is also achieved if the tilt of the cutter link is increased such that the face 60 will extend from the cutting edge 67 completely outwardly of the circle 63. In a sprocket nose bar the cutter links are not direct- ly supported by the sprocket, but are supported by the drive links which in turn are supported between the teeth of the sprocket. Thus by arranging the drive links so the common cen¬ terline of the rivets therein is outwardly inclined in the for¬ ward direction, the common centerline of the rivets in the cutter link will be inwardly inclined in the forward direction. Figure 7 of the drawing is a view the same as Figure 6 but with part of the cutter link 52 at Ε" broken away to show the disposition of the drive links 54- It will be noted that the common centerline 66 rivets holes 68 of the drive link 54 is inclined upwardly in the forward direction of movement of the chain at an angle 'F' to the radial lines 52b that passes through the center of the gullet 50b. If the cutter link face 60 is to occupy a chordal relation to the circle 63 then the angle 'F' will be less than 90° and normally of the order of (90 - B) ° . In order to achieve the required Inclination of the common centerline 66 of the drive links 54, when using a sym¬ metrically shaped drive link and sprocket teeth, it is necess¬ ary to rearrange the relative disposition of the rivet holes 68 in the drive link. Refer now to Figures 8a and 8b, wherein Figure 8a shows a conventional drive link and Figure 8b shows the arr¬ angements of the holes in the drive link that may be used with a conventional sprocket. The conventional drive link shown in Figure 8a has leading and trailing faces 82 and 83 which co-operate with com¬ plementary faces on the gullet in the sprocket when in use. The trailing and leading faces may be equally inclined to the radial line 52b, in which case the complementary faces of the gullet would be equally Inclined. Alternatively, as in some known constructions the inclination of the faces 82 and 83 to the line 52b differ, and in those Instances the complementary faces on the gullet would be similarly differently inclined to the radial line 52c. However, irrespective of the arrangement, the conventional drive link has the common centerline 66 of the holes 68 at right angles to the radial line 52b. In the drive link construction shown in Figure 8b, the faces 82 and 83 are again equally inclined to the radial line 52b as discussed above. However, in this construction, the dis¬ position of the holes 68 are such that the common centerline 66 is inclined to the radial line 52b so that in use the hole at the leading end of the drive link is located further from the axis of the sprocket than is the hole at the trailing end of the drive link. This variation can be achieved by leaving either one of the holes in the conventional location and mov¬ ing the other hole or both the holes may be moved relative to the conventional position as Indicated in Figure 8b. In this construction the angle 'F' between the radial line 52b and the common centerline 66 is preferably of the order of (90 - B)° as previously discussed. However, in some instances, it may be acceptable not to completely eliminate the risk of kick back, and to merely reduce the potential severity thereof by permitt¬ ing the face 60 of the cutter link to extend slightly inwardly from the circle 63. There has been discussed earlier in this specification the fact that it is current practice for the trailing face of the tongue of the drive link to be inclined at an angle of 50° to the common centerline passing through the rivets of the drive link which connect it to the adjacent links of the chain. Also as previously explained it is widely accepted prac tice for the included angle between adjacent teeth on the nose sprocket to be in the order of &5 as this has been found to accommodate most of the normal chains currently in use. The teeth of the nose sprocket are also symmetrically arranged so that the bar may be reversed in the saw. By an appropriate arrangement of the disposition of the rivet holes in the drive link, a chain can be produced which will operate with most currently used guide bars in a manner to produce a reduction in kick back. Referring to Figure 9 the line 70 bisects the angle * G' between the trailing and leading faces 71 and 72 of the drive link tongue 73 , said angle being preferably 85 . The angle 'F' between the line 70 and the common centerline 74 of the rivets 75 is then of the order of 84 to 86°, however, the angle may be as low as about 78°. The extent that the angle 'F * is below 90 is influence by the assymetre of the teeth of the nose sprocket. In currently known cutting links, the cutting edge of the link may be located forward or rearward of the line 76 in Figure 9 which is normal to the common centerline 77 of the rivets of a cutter link and centrally between the rivet holes of the cutter link. When the cutting edge is forward of the line 76 the angle 'F' of inclination of the bisecting line 70 is preferably increased by comparison to that necessary when the cutting edge is located rearwardly of the line 76. When the cutting edge is forward of the line 76 then the Inclinat¬ ion of the bisecting line 70 is preferably of the order of 78 to 82 and more specifically preferably 80 . When the cutting edge is rearward of the line 76 then the angle of inclination of bisecting line 70 is preferably of the order of 82 to 86°, and more specifically preferably 84°. The selection of the angle of inclination of said bi- secting line is also influenced to a degree by the clearance angle on the cutting edge of the cutter link, however, as this angle is normally of the order of 7° to 9° the above referred to range of angles of inclination will accommodate the normal . variations in the clearance angle of the cutting edge In a conventional chain the angle between the common centerline 74 and the trailing face of link is usually 50 . If the angle between the leading and trailing faces of the drive link remains at the standard figure of l.5 , when the common 5 centerline is inclined as in the present invention, then the angle between the trailing face and the common centerline will increase. Thus if the angle 'F' is 80° and the angle 'G' is re¬ tained at β 5° . the angle between the trailing face 82 and the common centerline 74 is 57%° - Alternatively if it is preferred 10 to maintain the standard 50 angle between the common center¬ line and the trailing face then the angle between the trailing and leading faces of the drive link may be adjusted, to main¬ tain the required inclination between the bisecting line 70 and the common centerline 74- 15 In still a further modification the chain could be con¬ structed so that a drive tongue is formed Integral with the cutter link, whereby the degree of Inclination of the cutter link as it passes around the sprocket, can be obtained by the same considerations as previously referred to, applicable to 20 the drive link tongue. However, as the inclination is now «* • being applied directly to the cutter link the direction of in¬ clination of the bisecting line is opposite to that of the drive link as previously discussed. A suitable form of such a cutter link is shown In Fig- 25 ure 10 of the accompanying drawings wherein the line 90 bisect¬ ing the angle between the tracking and leading faces 92 and 93, Intersects the common centerline 91 of the cutter link riv¬ ets 94 at an angle H which is greater than 90° and preferably of the order of (90 + B)°. The clearance angle of the face 95 30 extending rearward from the cutting edge being B°. The angle H is subject to variation dependent on the clearance angle B and the length of the face 95 rearward of the rear rivet 94, as previously discussed. In each of the constructions previously discussed in- 35 volving the use of a sprocket nose bar, the required inclinat¬ ion of the cutter link has been achieved by modification of the drive tongue to co-operate with a conventional sprocket. However, it will be readily appreciated that it is the combin¬ ed effect of the interfitting of the drive tongue with the sprocket that brings about the required disposition of the cutter link as it passes around the nose of the bar. According¬ ly the scope of the invention includes constructions wherein modification are made to the sprocket, or to the sprocket and drive tongues to achieve the required disposition of the cutt¬ er link. • ^0 E

Claims: - 20 - THE CLAIMS DEFINING THE INVENTION ARE AS FOLLOWS:- 1. A chain saw including a bar and a chain as herein de¬ fined supported on the bar to travel about the periphery there¬ of, the nose portion of the bar and the chain being adapted to co-operate in use so that portion of transverse land of each cutter link rearward of the cutting edge of the cutter link travels a path outward of, or the same as, the path travelled by the cutting edge of the cutter link as the cutter link pass¬ es around the nose portion of the bar. 2. A chain saw as claimed in claim 1 wherein the chain co-operates with the nose portion of the bar so that the common centerline of the pins pivotally connecting the respect¬ ive cutter links to the links of the chain on either side thereof is inwardly inclined in the forward direction of travel to the line radial to the path of the cutting edge that intersects said common centerline substantially midway between the pins. «- 3- A chain saw as claimed in claim 2 wherein the inclinat¬ ion of said common centerline is at least that required so the end of the transverse land remote from the cutting edge foll¬ ows the same path as the cutting edge around the nose portion of the bar. 4. A chain saw as claimed in claim 2 or 3 wherein the cutter links of the chain are supported directly on the periph¬ eral surface of the nose portion of the bars as the cutter links pass there around, said nose portion being rigid with the remainder of the bar, each cutter link having a surface in supporting sliding engagement with the peripheral surface of the nose portion and shaped to provide said inward inclination of said common centerline. 5. A chain saw as claimed in claim 4 wherein the support¬ ing surface of the cutter link to curved to substantially com¬ plement the curve of the nose portion of the bar, the center of curvation of the curved supporting surface being spaced for- ■ " E wardly from a line normal to said common centerline at substan¬ tially the mid-point thereof. 6. A chain saw as claimed in claim 2 or 3 wherein said nose portion of the bar includes a roller rotatably supported by the bar for rotation about an axis normal to the plane of the bar, said roller having a plurality of flat supports sur¬ faces on the periphery of the roller arranged so each cutter link of the chain is supported on one of said flat surfaces as the cutter link passes around the nose portion of bar, each said flat surface being inclined inwardly to the radial line from the axis of the roller to the mid-point of the flat sur¬ face so said common centerline of the cutter link has said in¬ ward inclination. 7. A chain saw as claimed in claim 6 wherein the flat support surfaces are spaced and arranged so the cutter links and the connector links of the chain a.re supported on respect¬ ive flat support surfaces of the roller as the chain passes around the nose portion of the bar. 8. A chain saw as claimed in claim 6 or 7 wherein said nose portion of the bar includes a sprocket secured co-axially to the roller, with a tooth of said sprocket associated with each flat surface of the roller so the tooth engages the link of the chain support on the associated flat surface. 9. A chain saw as claimed in claim 2 or 3 wherein said nose portion of the bar includes a sprocket rotatably support¬ ed by the bar for rotation about an axis normal to the bar, said sprocket co-operating with the drive link tongues of the chain In driving engagement, said sprocket and each drive link tongue of the chain being adapted so that the common center¬ line of the pins pivotally connecting the drive link to the links on either side thereof is outwardly Inclined in the for¬ ward direction of travel of the chain to the line radial to the sprocket axis and passing through the center of the root of the gullet between the sprocket teeth in which the drive link is engaged, whereby said common centerline of the cut] link connected at each end to respective drive links will have said inward inclination. 10. A chain saw as claimed in claim 9 wherein the included angle between the leading and trailing faces of the respective gullets of the sprocket are substantially equal to the includ¬ ed angle between the leading and trailing faces of the respect¬ ive drive link tongues, and the common centerline of the pivot¬ al connections of the drive link is inclined outwardly in the forward direction to the line bisecting said included angle of the drive link tongue. 11. A chain saw as claimed- in claim 10 wherein the angle between said bisecting line inwardly of said common centerline of the drive link and rearward of the bisecting line is sub¬ stantially between 78° and 86°. 12. A chain saw as claimed in claim 11 wherein said angle is substantially between 82° and 86°. 13. A chain saw as claimed in claim 10, 11 or 12 wherein the included angle between the leading and trailing faces of the drive link tongue is 85 . 14. A chain saw as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 12 wherein the trailing face of the drive link is inclined at sub¬ stantially 50° to said common centerline of the drive link. 15. A chain saw as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein said nose portion of the bar includes a sprocket rotat¬ ably supported by the bar for rotation about an axis normal to the bar, each cutter link of the chain having a dependent tongue, each said cutter link tongue being shaped to interfit with a gullet between the teeth of the sprocket in a manner so that said common centerline of the cutter link is inclined in¬ wardly in the forward direction as the cutter link passes around the sprocket to thereby locate said portion of the land on said path outwardly of or the same as that of the cutting edge of the cutter link. PI 16. A chain saw as claimed in claim 15 wherein each cutter link tongue has a leading and a trailing face which engage res pectively a leading and a trailing face of the gullet of the sprocket, and said common centerline of the cutter link is in¬ clined inwardly in the forward direction to the line bisecting the included angle between the leading and trailing faces of the cutter link tongue. 17. A chain saw as claimed in claim 1 wherein the land of the cutter link extends rearwardly beyond the pivot connection at the rear of the cutter link a distance sufficient so that as the cutter link passes around the nose portion of the bar the rear extremity of the land travels said path outwardly of or the same as the path of the cutting edge of the cutter link. 18. A chain saw as claimed in claim 1 wherein a projection is provided on the land portion spaced rearwardly from the cutting edge, said projection having a height above the sur¬ face ' of the land portion so that in use the outer extremity of the projection will travel said path outwardly of or the same as the cutting edge path. 19. A chain saw chain of the type herein specified wherein each cutter link having a body portion pivotally connected to the adjacent links, a land portion extending transversely to and integral with the body portion, said land portion having a forward end forming a cutting edge, the land portion rearward of the cutting edge being adapted so that in use as the cutter link passes around a nose portion of a chain saw bar at least part of land portion rearward of the cutting edge travels a path outwardly of or the same as the path of the cutting edge. 20. A chain as claimed in claim 19 wherein the land por¬ tion rearward of the cutting edge is inclined inwardly relat¬ ive to the common centerline of the pivot connections to the adjacent links, and the land portion is adapted so that in use the rearward end thereof travels said path outwardly of or the same as the cutting edge path. OMPI 21. A chain as claimed in claim 19 wherein a projection is provided on the land portion spaced rearwardly from the cutt¬ ing edge, said projection having a height above the surface of the land portion so that in use the outer extremity of the pro¬ jection will travel said path outwardly of or the same as the cutting edge path. 22. A chain as claimed in claim 19 wherein the drive links each have a dependent tongue to co-operate in use with the sprocket of a sprocket nose chain saw bar, said drive link tongues each being shaped to interfit with the gullet between the sprocket teeth in a manner so that the common centerline of the pivotal connections between the cutter link and the ad¬ jacent drive links is inclined inwardly in the forward direct¬ ion as the cutter links pass around the sprocket. 23. A chain as claimed in claim 22 wherein the drive link tongue has a leading and a trailing face which engage complem¬ entary faces of the sprocket gullet when In use, the common centerline of the pivotal connections between the drive link and the adjacent links of the chain being inclined outwardly in the forward direction to the line bisecting the angle be¬ tween the trailing and leading faces of the tongue. 24- A chain as claimed in claim 23 wherein the angle be¬ tween said common centerline of the drive link and said bisect¬ ing line rearward of the bisecting line and inward of said common centerline is substantially between 78 and 86°. 25. A chain as claimed in claim 24 wherein said angle is substantially between 82° and 86°. 26. A chain as claimed in claim 19 wherein each cutter link has a dependent tongue to co-operate in use with the sprocket of a sprocket nose chain saw bar, said cutter link tongues each being shaped to Interfit with the gullet between the sprocket teeth in a manner so that the common centerline of the pivotal connections between the cutter link and the ad¬ jacent drive links In inclined inwardly the forward direction - E as the cutter links pass around the sprocket. 27. A chain as claimed in claim 26 wherein each cutter link tongue has a leading and a trailing face which engage complementary faces of the sprocket gullet when in use, the common centerline of the pivotal connections between the cutter link and the adjacent links of the chain being inclin¬ ed inwardly in the forward direction to the line bisecting the angle between the trailing and leading faces of the tongue. 28. A chain as claimed in claim 27 wherein the angle be¬ tween said common centerline of the cutter link and said bi¬ secting line rearward of the bisecting line and inward of said common centerline is between 78° and 86°. 29. A chain as claimed in claim 28 wherein said angle is between 82° -and 86°.

Inventors: BEERENS CORNELIS JOHANNES MARI, BEERENS, CORNELIS, JOHANNES, MARIA
Applicants: BEERENS CORNELIS J, BEERENS, CORNELIS, JOHANNES, MARIA
Application year: 1983
Main classification: B27B33
IPC codes: B27B17, B27B33