INTEGRATED OPTIC DEVICE

Abstract: In the case of an optical beam coupled to a waveguide (2) of an integrated optic device by means of a prism coupler (3) or a grating coupler for maximum coupled optical energy the coupling angle (ϑ) must be strictly controlled. This is achieved by controlling the temperature of the device, rather than the conventional mechnical control techniques, since ϑ is dependent on various parameters, such as the refractive indices of the prism and waveguide, which are themselves temperature dependent. Dynamic control of the optical throughput of the device is thus achievable by means of an electronic feedback loop circuit controlling the temperature of the device accordingly. A solid state laser printer may include a surface acoustic wave device based on such an integrated optic device as a laser beam deflector. A laser beam modulated with the information to be printed is coupled to the waveguide of an acoustic wave device and acoustic waves generated in the waveguide employed to scan the light beam over a photo-­ sensitive surface moving transversely to the scan direction.

Description: Integrated Optic Device This invention relates to an integrated optic device and in particular to the control of their optical throughput, and to their use in information transfer apparatus. Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 shows, schematically, prism coupling of light into a waveguide of an integrated optic device; Fig. 2 shows, schematically, grating coupling of light into a waveguide of an integrated optic device; Fig. 3 shows, schematically, an electronic feedback loop for use in automatically controlling the optical throughput of such an integrated optic device, and Fig. 4 shows, schematically, an alternative electronic control system. An integrated optic 'device basically comprises a substrate 1 (Fig. 1), typically lithium niobate (LiNbO3), having a sur face layer 2 of a higher refractive index than the substrate 1. The surface layer 2 is produced by diffusion or ion im pLantation techniques and may comprise a planar (as shown), or channel, optical waveguide for an optical beam coupled thereinto. Two common techniques for coupling light into such waveguides comprise prism coupling (Fig. 1) and grating coupling (Fig. 2). Fig. 1 shows a prism 3. Of the input op optical power 11, a portion 12 is coupled into the waveguide comprised by layer 2 and a portion R1 is reflected. In order for light to be most efficiently coupled to the waveguide it must be incident at a specific angle 0. The exact value of this angle 6 depends on a number of para meters including waveguide refractive index, waveguide depth, optical wavelength and prism refractive index or in the case of grating coupling, the grating being illustrated schematically at 4 in Fig. 2, the grating period. The fraction of the incident energy coupled into the waveguide is critically dependent on the angle 0. Conventionally the beam coupling angle and the beam angle of incidence are controlled mechanically by very high accuracy mechanical fabrication and adjustment of prism coupling or grating coupting, and of the support structures of the integrated optic device and light source. However, this approach is expensive and does not readily lend itself to dynamic electronic control of the optical throughput of the device. The present invention is based on the recognition that the angle e is also dependent on temperature, due to the ,temperature dependence of the related parameters such as the refractive indices of the prism and the waveguide. This allows the fine adjustment required to control the optical input 12 into the waveguide to be achieved relatively in expensively by correspondingly controlling the temperature of the integrated optic device. For some applications a 10 degree temperature range with 0.2 degree increments would be adequate. This may readily be achieved by, for example, mounting the integrated optic device to a thermoelectric heat pump, which would give an additional benefit of small size. Alternatively this may be achieved by resistive heating and air cooling. The technique of controlling 6, and thus the optical power I2, by controlling the temperature of the integrated optic device readily lends itself to dynamic electronic control, although manual control may be employed. In order to maximise 12, the reflected optical power R1, may be monitored by, for example, a photodiode, or alternatively light I3, whose intensity is proportional to that of 121 may be drawn from 12 by some convenient means of output coupling and monitored with a photodiode. Then by means of electronic feedback loop the optical power I2 may be maximised by varying the temperature of the integrated optic device to minimise R1, or maximise I3, respectively. One such electronic feedback loop is illustrated schematically in Fig. 3 and employs light 13 detected by a photodiode 5. The temperature of the integrated optic device (not shown) is caused to vary by a small amount at a known frequency derived from an oscillator 9. Variations in 12 at this frequency are detected by monitoring 131 or R1, by photodiode 5, and are distinguished from other signals or noise by a bandpass amplifier 6, a phase-locked amplifier 8 and a low pass amplifier 10, which together effectively act as a narrow bandpass filter at the oscillator frequency. The output of amplifier 10 is a low frequency signal whose sign (positive or negative) indicates whether the temperature is above or below a temperature T required for maximum m 12, and whose amplitude decreases as the temperature approaches T . The output of amplifier 10 is fed into an m integrator 11 whose output will vary due to the input from amplifier 10 but which will settle down as the temperature approaches T . The output of integrator 11 provides the m voltage level about which the oscillator level varies since the two are added in a summing amplifier 12. This voltage signal is then translated into temperature by a temperature controlLer 13 for the thermoelectric heat pump (not shown). The output of photodiode 5 is also applied to a comparator 7 by means of which it is compared with a reference leveL to provide a low light output indication. That is, to detect when insufficient light is falling on the photodiode and to warn of that situation. The electronic feedback could be impLemented using either microprocessor control or using a combination of analogue and digital integrated circuits. When designing such a system the phase of the signals at various points will need to be taken into consideration. An alternative electronic approach is to use a system which scans through a range of temperatures, measuring I2 at each temperature (via R1, or I3) and then selects the temperature which gives a desired value of I 2 The advantage of this approach is that the value of I2 chosen need not be a maximum. A disadvantage is that the electronics required are more complex. A block diagram of a possible system is shown in Fig. 4. This dynamic controlacility is particularly useful in view of the fact that both gas and solid state lasers have output optical beams, which may be employed as integrated optic device light sources, that can change in direction, intensity and wavelength with time. In addition, the optical wavelength emitted by solid state lasers is temperature sensitive. This will effect the optimum coupling angle e and so must be corrected for by either controlling the laser temperature or the integrated optic device temperature. It is thus envisaged that the present invention may be employed with either "manual" or electronic temperature control. The input direction of the optical beam is approximately set mechanically. The optical throughput Iz is optimised by changing the temperature of the device appropriately, hence the optimum beam coupling angle. In the latter case, the optical throughput 12 may further be dynamically controlled by an electronic feedback loop which controls the temperature of the device to compensate for changes in coupling angle, to laser wavelength changes, for laser beam direction variations, for mechanical movement, and/or changes in the incident power 11 The integrated optic device referred to above may be employed, for example, in a solid state deflector for a laser printer or copier. A laser printer is a high speed printer which basically comprises means to convert the characters etc. of an input text to be printed to a suitable serial data stream form, a deflection control signal, for example a a line scan voltage ramp, being generated in synchronism with the serial data stream; a laser beam source; laser modulation drive circuits which convert the logic pulses in the serial data stream to suitable voltage and current levels for either driving a modulator for a CW (continuous wave) laser or driving the modulation of a semiconductor laser directly; a line scan laser deflector driven in accordance with the line scan voltage ramp referred to above, for example; and optics to focus the deflected laser beam to write on a photo-sensitive surface, such as a rotating selenium drum, to produce an electrostatic pattern of the text character, for example. The drum picks up powdered ink on the electrostatic pattern and deposits it on to plain paper. The ink is set in a e.g. pressure process to produce the printed copy. The Laser deflector may be formed by a surface acoustic wave device which comprises an integrated optic device to which a laser beam is coupled by a method as described above, that is a lithium niobate substrate on which a surface layer of a higher refractive index than the substrate is produced. The surface layer comprises an optical waveguide for the laser beam which is coupled to and from this layer by, for example, separate prismatic coupling assemblies which, together with appropriate optics, interface to the laser source and the photo-sensitive surface, respectively. Surface transducers are arranged to generate acoustic waves in the surface layer waveguide, causing the refractive index of the layer to be modulated and so produce a diffraction grating. Optimisation of the drive power to these transducers and therefore the depth of index modulation achieved, together with the interaction length of the grating region, which can then be scanned by controlling the drive frequency and hence the grating period. The grating may comprise a linearly controlled deflection grating or, alternatively, a travelling chirp grating. Whereas prism coupling has been referred to, the deflector may alternatively employ grating coupling for coupling the Laser beam into the waveguide.

Claims: Claims 1. An integrated optic device comprising a surface acoustic wave device (1, 2) having a waveguide (2) and transducers for causing surface waves in response to an electrical signal applied thereto, an optical coupler (3) for coupling an incident light beam into the waveguide (1, 2) at an angle cub), and device mounting means adapted to control the temperature of the device whereby to compensate for variations in the beam coupling angle and/or for variations in the beam angle of incidence and/or for variations in the power of the incident light beam. 2. An arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein the optical coupler (3) is a prism coupler. 3. An arrangement as claimed in claim 1 or 2, further comprising electronic feedback loop (Fig. 3) means whereby to control the waveguide temperature dynamically and optimise the optical throughput of the waveguide. 4. An arrangement as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the integrated optic device is mounted on a thermoelectric heat pump. 5. An arrangement as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the feedback loop circuit serves to monitor the proportion (R1) of the optical beam which is reflected from the device (2) rather than coupled thereto and control the temperature of the device whereby to minimise the reflected portion of the optical beam. 6. An arrangement as claimed in claim 3, wherein the feedback loop circuit serves to monitor the power of the optical beam (J2) 2 as coupled into the waveguide, or a beam proportional thereto, and control the temperature of the device whereby to control the monitored power. 7. An arrangement as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the temperature of the device is controlled whereby to compensate for variations in the beam coupling angle (e) and/or in the beam angle of incidence and/or in the power of the incident optical beam. 8. An arrangement as claimed in claim 1, 3 or claim 4, wherein the device temperature is adjusted to each of a number of values and the proportion of the incident optical beam coupLed to the waveguide calculated for each temperature value and wherein the device temperature is then set to the value corresponding to a predetermined value for the proportion of coupled incident optical beam. 9. Apparatus for transferring information with an integrated optic device according to any of the preceding claims including a light beam source, means for modulating the light beam with the information, means for coupling the modulated light beam to the waveguide at an angle, means for generating a light beam deflection control signal to be applied to the transducers in use of the apparatus whereby to scan the coupled light beam, means to couple the scanned light beam to a light sensitive surface for recordal or display of the information thereon, means for causing relative movement between the light sensitive surface and the beam transverse to the direction of scanning; and means for adjusting the temperature of the waveguide whereby to adjust the coupling angle and thus the optical throughput of the device.

Inventors: MOROZ, JOHN
Applicants: INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Application year: 1983
Main classification: G02F1
IPC codes: G02B6, G02F1