A METHOD AND A DEVICE FOR MONITORING LARGE METAL STRUCTURES

Abstract: Monitoring large structures to detect defects, e.g. cracks. An electric current is impressed on a steel structure (31, 32) equipped with contact points (41-45) between which are measured voltage drops caused by the impressed current. A relatively large number of fixed contact points are used all over the area which is to be monitored. The voltage drops are measured between selected pairs of contact points and these voltage drops are compared with corresponding voltage drops having been measured previously in the same manner when the structure was in an initial condition, preferably without any defects. Such monitoring is mainly applicable on oil drilling rigs and petroleum production platforms for exploitation of oil and gas fields offshore, where it is important that the monitoring can be performed by means of robust and simple devices resistible to the prevailing rough environments.

Description: A Method and a Device for W nitoring large Metal Structures. In recent years large metal structures, in particular steel structures, have been built such at dimensions and have been adopted under so severe circumstances that the need for detection and localization of defects therein, e.g. cracks or fractures, has become urgent in many applications. Exampl in this respect are large vessels and offshore petroleum pro duction structures which occasionally have met with accident that have increased the need for more accurate monitoring systems. Various measuring principles of such monitoring systems have been suggested, i.a. methods based on vibration analysis, acoustic emission, ultrasonic systems, registration of mag¬ netic fields as well as visual inspection. So far these methods have not been adequate in this connection likely because of the great strains to which the monitoring equipme can be exposed, in particular under water. In addition to being resistant to such strains, it is also important that the monitoring systems do not entail prohibitive installatio and maintenance costs as the components or areas which are to be monitored often have very large dimensions. Systems that for example are based on the use of a number of trans¬ ducers, e.g. for detection of vibration, acoustic emission or ultrasonic signals, may involve mounting of a large numbe •of transducers, each one representing comparatively high expenses and a risk of failure. Another previously disclosed method for examination of cracks in structural parts or components is based on measurement of the electric field that is produced in the structure. This so called potential drop method is used for detailed examination of a crack that has been localized beforehand. The size or depth of the crack is determined by means of contact points o each side of the crack, between which the voltage is measured The supplied current is a DC or an AC with a low frequency. Different versions of the potential drop method have been published in German Patent Application No. 25 57 658 and in United Kingdom Patent Specification No. 804.323. In the forme publication a high frequency current supply is used, and the examination comprises measurements of the drop of potential as a function of the frequency. In the latter case, which in particular has been reported to concern surface cracks, a radio frequency potential is measured, which potential occurs between two separate electrodes that are moved on the surface of the structure while an oscillating electric current is supplied thereto from a source of radio frequency. Such an arrangement with movable electrodes which are to be guided all over the monitoring area cannot, however, be used for the purpose mentioned above. The object of the present invention is to monitor, under difficult and perhaps extreme conditions, e.g. on offshore oil drilling rigs and petroleum production platforms, large areas or surfaces of steel structures in the course of long periods of time and to detect possible defects, such as crac or corrosion damages, as they may develop. Basically the invention involves application of the potential drop method, as the structure or a section thereof is supplied with an electric current and voltage drops are measured between contact points on the surface of the structure when the ... structure is in an initial condition and preferably does *• not have any defects. Similar measurements of voltage drops are performed on the structure when in use, which measuremen are compared with the measurements from the initial conditio The new feature of the present invention consists in that the structure or a section thereof is equipped with a com¬ paratively large number of fixed contact points arranged in a pattern with a relatively uniform distribution all over the structure or over the section which is to be monitored, and in that measurements are performed on supplying an elect current through at least two contact points or electrodes on the structure to measure the voltage drop between selecte pairs of contact points among an essential portion or all of said contact points, the total picture of deviations between measurements from the initial condition and those from said performed measurements being included in the detection and localization of any defects. In such a method a characteristic signature of the structure is thus determined when the structure is in an initial con¬ dition and does not have any defects. During the operation of the structure similar measurements are performed and are compared with said signature. Possible deviations are calcu¬ lated, e.g. in per thousand of the voltage drop, and present in an appropriate manner. An advantage of this method is that delicate sensors or transducers are not applied. The contact points arranged on the structure may be shaped as strong steel bolts, fixed to the structure by welding. When appropriately designed and protected against corrosion such contact points will functio without any faults throughout the entire estimated lifetime of the structure. Another advantage in many applications stems from the fact that steel and other metals, compared to salt water, constitu extremely low ohmic systems which are insensitive to leakage currents in the water. Obviously, this is important when it comes to offshore structures such as oil drilling rigs, petroleum production platforms and ship hulls. It is possible to detect small cracks before they have got such sizes that there is a danger of break down of the structure. Transverse cracks for instance, can be detected even though less than 5 per cent of the cross section of the material in a larger steel tube has been lost- Longitudinal cracks in such a tube may be detected by means of a number of sources for supplying the excitation current to the structure or rather by connecting the same source to different pairs o current supply electrodes. It is as well possible to design and arrange the contact points so that a greater number of these points or all of them by turns and in pairs can be use to feed the excitation current to the structure. In principle it is possible to use a DC as well as an AC source in this method. Application of a stationary DC results in certain disadvantages, primarily because thermoelectric potentials may cause disturbances, and because requirements are then set to high stability in the necessary electronic circuits. The voltage drops which occur between two contact points are usually measured in microvolt, in the order of magnitude, which means that amplification will always be necessary. Further, it is desirable to .measure the voltage drop at a great accuracy, e.g. at an accuracy of about 1 per thousand. These circumstances are the reason why an AC with an appropriate shaped curve and frequency is preferred, although some additional and undesirable effects are then incorporated and complicate the measuring principle in some degree. Nevertheless, such embodiment may involve an advanta as far as the technics of measurement is concerned. Conse¬ quently, an excitation current shaped as a rectangular wave has been chosen. The excitation current gives rise to a voltage drop because of the resistivity of the structural material. This voltage drop will be shaped in the same way as the excitation curren and is primarily the basis of the measurements in the course of monitoring. As indicated above, some additional effects will occur, which effects may be considered to represent disturbances, dependent on the circumstances. Such effects are caused by electric induction in the measuring cables as a result of alterations of the excitation current and of skin effect in the structural part when the current alter- O nates rapidly and gives rise to high frequency components. The appearance of the skin effect causes high or low current density in the surface (dependent on whether we consider the outer surface or the inner one of e.g. a tube). This increas current density, in turn results in a transient signal that d more or less slowly, dependent on the geometry of the struct and on its electric and magnetic properties. The considerations above form a background of a choise prefe ably to use such a low frequency, or pulse frequency respec¬ tively, that transients which are initiated by the rising or falling current, dies before the current again alternates. If the excitation current is kept constant a certain period of time, a stationary condition will eventually occur. In that case the measuring signal will be given only by the current distribution in the structure and the resistivity of the structural material, i.e. the case corresponds to the application of a pure DC excitation. On measuring the difference in the signals between each half period of the alternating current in such a stationary condition, the unfortunate influence of signals which are not associated with the excitation current such as thermoelectric potential drift in amplifier, etc. is eliminated as well. Further, it is expedient to perform relative measurements, e.g. by performing additional measurements at even intervals of the voltage drop across a pair of reference electrodes which should be positioned in an area on the structure where cracks will likely not occur. Thus, it is in principle possib to obtain an effective compensation for any changes in the excitation current as well. Such relative measurements may compensate for lots of undesirable effects, particularly if the same amplifier alternately is coupled to the measuring points concerned. Further features of the method reported above and of the device for performing this method will be apparent from the following description with references to the attached drawings, and from the claims. In the drawings, Fig. 1 shows an example of a tubular structural part with a drawn image of an electric field that corresponds to a situation (Fig. la) void of defects and (Fig. lb), with a field image affected by a defect (transversal crack), Fig. 2 is an arrangement or pattern of contact points for detection or monitoring of a tubular part as shown in Fig. 1, the wall of the tube being unfolded, Fig. 3 is an embodiment for monitoring a junction in a structure consisting of tubular members, Fig. 4 illustrates shapes of curves on excitation currents and other signals which occur in a practical perfor mance of the present invention, and Fig. 5 is a possible way in which the monitoring results can be presented. In figure la a length of a tubular structural part has been shown, the right end of which having been cut off. A current supply point 2a is shown at the left of the tubular part, whi a corresponding contact point is provided at its right end; shown- It is presupposed that the tube has no defects, e.g. cracks that may influence the distribution of the electric current and field and thereby the drop of potential along the tube. Equipotential lines are indicated by dotted lines 10a O in figure la, which lines show the course of the electric field in the tube, while the continuous lines 20a illustrate the current paths in this rather idealized case. In figure lb the same tubular part has been shown in a situat where a crack 3 has developed transversally to the length direction of the tube. On supplying an electric excitation current in the same way as in figure la, a changed image of the field will be produced due to the crack 3, as it appears from the modified course of the equipotential lines 10b and current paths 20b respectively, around the crack 3. These changes are largest close to the irregularity represented by the crack 3, which irregularity is the reason why the current paths are displaced. However, the effect can be measured a certain distance from the crack too, dependent on the ability of the measuring equipment to detect small alterations of voltage. In figures la and lb, which are disclosed only as a mere elementary and simplified explanation of the principle forming the basis of the invention, the image of the electric field in figure la can be considered the original signature or initial condition which the structural part possesses when the monitoring is started. Thus, the structural part is preferably void of defects in this initial condition. When e.g. a crack 3 as shown in figure lb developes " in the course of some time of monitoring, a change image of the field appears, which image can be detected. The voltage drops or differences having been measured in this situation can be compared with the signature according to figure la for determination and localization of defects represented by deviations between the two series of measurements. Figure 2 shows examples of locating a number of measuring or contact points denoted 1-21 on a tube as shown in figure 1, but unfolded in figure 2. As it appears from this figure the contact points are arranged in a regular pattern with sets of three points distributed along the circumference of the tube and in mutually spaced relationship to neighbouring points in different directions. The measurements of voltage drops in such an arrangement can be performed in groups from selected measuring electrodes as outgoing points, e.g. from the points 1, 4 and 13 as indicated by arrows. The measurements in group 1 are done e.g. in relation to the arrows E, g , E-,_ 7 and E 1-4 , respectively. The excitation current is supplied in a way that corresponds to the manner shown in figures la and lb, i.e. in the longitudinal direction of the tubular part. Figure 3 shows diagrammatically how the measuring method can be applied in practice to monitor a tubular junction in which an inclined tube 32 has been welded to a vertical tubular shaft 31. Such a junction, e.g. on a drilling rig, represents a type of a structural section for which monitoring is of great importance in order to detect early any defects that might develop in course of operation of the rig. The monitoring is controlled by a superior control and data processing system 33 which possibly can be a common system for a number of such sections or areas on the drilling rig. Additionally, the control system 33 comprises means for presentation of the measuring results; not shown in the figure. Two excitation sources 34 and 37 with associated contact points or feeding electrodes 35 and 36, and feeding electrodes 38 and 39 respectively, have been shown to illustrate how the excitatio current is supplied to the junction. With such an arrangement tw alternative possibilities of supplying current are available, each one having its own original signature, i.e. the image of an electric field in the initial condition. < \ The multiplexer 40 is controlled by the control system 33 -through a conductor 56, and delivers consecutive signals fro the different contact points 41-45 etc. to an amplifier 51. The output of amplifier 51 is connected to a gate circuit 52 which in a similar manner is controlled by the control syste 33 through a conductor 54, serving to allow the desired port of the signald to pass. This is to be explained further by reference to figure 4. In succession to the gate circuit a b 53 is indicated, which box 53 may be an A/D converter or alt tively a micro processor that performs a certain processing the measuring signals in the electronic unit 50 before the signals are delivered through a conductor 55 to the superior control and data processing system 33 for possible further processing and registration or presentation of the measuring results. The connections between the control system 33 and the electr circuit 50 can, as the case may be, comprise more than the t conductors 54, 55 and 56 shown in figure 3, dependent on whi functions the unit 50 shall serve. The figure indicates that these connecting cables may have the form of a databus 60. In case the circuit 53 is a micro processor, this processor can do the operation of the multiplexer 40 so as to change¬ over to the proper measuring points simultaneously as the processor provides for the first processing of the measured signals. When the electronic unit 50 is located fairly close to the section to be monitored, the path of conductors to the contact points becomes simple and practical. The same is achieved when the excitation sources are located in proximity to the same section. A particular possibility consists in using the same contact points both for measurement of voltage drops and for supply of excitation current. In that case the electronic unit 50 comprises the excitation source as well, and the multiplexer 40 has to be constructed in such a way as to be capable of transmitting the higher currents of the excitation source. Such an arrangement enables the system to give much more freedom of establishing a series of differe signatures for each area to be monitored so that separate pat of excitation currents can be arranged to detect special type of defects, e.g. longitudinal cracks. The necessary excitation current depends on the thickness of the structural material to be monitored; for a tube with a wall -thickness of 25 mm the excitation current should be for instance 30 ampere, or higher. This rule goes for rectangular wave shaped alternating currents with relative low frequencie e.g. 1-2 Hz. The superior control and data processing system 33 may mainly consist of a minor computer, e.g. a relative powerful desk to computer. The most important tasks for this computer may be: - Communication .with local excitation sources, electronic units and possibly microprocessors, as well as selection according to a certain program of each section among a number of sections to be monitored. - Storage of signatures. - Calculation of deviations from the respective signatures - Presentation of deviations. - Calculation of average values and presentation of these values. - Trend-analysis of minor irregularities in the measured values. - Possible graphical presentation of data, preferably printed in colours. On top (a) of Figure 4 is shown a rectangular wave shaped excitation current (AC) with frequency 1.5 Hz, i.e. period 0.67 sec. Below (b) is shown how the operating signal on a gate circuit, such as the gate 52 in figure 3, may be in orde to block out undesired portions of the resulting measuring signal, as this signal will involve transients that may dominate the operation of the consecutive electronic circuits The resulting measuring signals at the output of the gate circuit is shown on bottom (c) of Figure 4. The voltages that are to be measured are denoted Ξ., and E_, and time intervals T-. and T- respectively, are shown for each half period. It appears from Figure 4c that the measuring signal in the time interval T-. has reached a constant value after the transient portion of the signal at the beginning of each half period has died. The same goes for the time interval T . As mentioned above these transients are caused by different effects, such a induction in the measuring cables, skin effect, etc. The value which is to be determined is E = E. - E,. It is desirable to determine this value as accurate as possible, preferably at an accuracy of approximately 1 per thousand or better. At least the relative accuracy between a measurement concerning one group of contact points (see the description of figure 2) and a measurement across a reference pair of electrodes ought to be in this order of magnitude. Different kinds of noise may result in inaccuracies of the measurements. The main sources of noise are: Signals being induced in the measuring loop due to the electric installations (cables to the contact points and the associated structural part) . Mainly, such a noise occurs in two different ways, namely: a) More or less continuously on the line frequency and its harmonics. The dominating components are often 50 and 150 Hz. b) Transients occurring when switching electrical apparatus on and off. Noise in the amplifier. Drift in the amplifier, multiplexer, etc. The requirement set to stability in such circuits and units is related to the period of time which is needed to perform a complete measurement, i.e. that the measurement includes the reference measurement. Because of the conditions one has to deal with in practice these sources of noise imply that it usually becomes necessary to use statistic methods for processing the measuring signals. In order to illustrate the meaning of statistic processing herein the following procedure is given as an example: As a first step, it is provided for an averaging of a number of courses in time of the measuring signal. Then 20 samples are taken in the measuring time interval (T-. and T_ in figure Among these samples the five highest values and the five lowes are rejected from each group of 20 samples. The computer then calculates the arithmetic average value of the remaining 10 samples (of E, and E_). Then E = E, - Ε- is calculated. This sequence is repeated four times, so that four measuring values of E are produced. The highest and lowest values of E are rejected. At last the average arithmetic value of the two remaining values of E is calculated. Performance of a measurement in accordance with this procedure may last some minutes when an ordinary laboratory equipment is being used. The required measuring time will be much reduced by means of special-built equipment and by applying a better procedure of averaging the numbers. In this respect, however, it should be remarked that such measurements do allow much consumption of time because the defects or phenomena that are to be monitored will not develop particularly rapid in the course of normal monitoring phases. If excitation by a sinusoidal AC is applied, the resulting measuring signal between two contact points will also become sinusoidal with an amplitude and phase that is dependent on the above mentioned conditions, i.e. the resistivity of the structural material, of skin effects and of induction in the measuring cables. Sinusoidal excitation current, however, requires other procedures for the signal treatment than is described above in connection with a rectangular shaped wave For example, it is of essential importance to distinguish th signal components that are in phase with the excitation curr and those being displaced 90° in relation to the same curren The required comparison of deviations between the original signature and a measurement performed later can take place at different levels. At the lowermost level individual measurements are compared with each other. In order to simplify the interpretation of the measured deviations, there may be a need for comparison in a more concentrated form. An essential point of the invention is that the total image of deviations between the signature and a later series of measurements, obtained by measurements on a relatively large number of contact points, be included in a manually or automatically performed consideration of the condition. A possible graphical presentation form of measured results, i.e. deviations from the signature, is illustrated in figure The structural-part to be-monitored is presupposed-therein t constitute a tube length, e.g- as shown in figure 2. Figure shows the tube in an unfolded condition, and a network of -squares with small ™ circles-' certain * "cross , ±πg ™ poi * nt * s" are-"dr to mark contact points for measuring voltage drops. The figu in some of the squares represent measured deviations from th signature (in per thousand) on a tube with a diameter of 760 and with a wall thickness of approximately 25 mm. Blank squa mean that the measured deviation is equal to or less than ± 3 per thousand, and a cross indicates that measurements have n been performed to cover that position. Deviations less than 3 per thousand have not been reported in figure 5 because such small deviations may be due to uncertainties (noise) caused b the measuring arrangement. Four situations have been represented: a, b, c and d corre¬ sponding to a lost cross sectional area of 2.5%, 5%, 10% and 15%, respectively. The investigated defect or crack appears from figure 5a where the crack has been indicated in the squ showing a deviation of 7 per thousand. It appears from figur that a development of a crack from 2.5% to 10 and 15% of the square sectional area results in a good indication in this representation so that it becomes possible to state in due time that an unfortunate development is going on. The proper location of the defect may as well be determined with a satis factory certainty.

Claims: Claims :. 1. A method for monitoring large metal structures, in particular steel structures, e.g. ship structures, bridges, oil drilling rigs and petroleum production platforms, in orde to detect and localize defects such as cracks that might occur in course of the lifetime of the structure, in which method an electric current is supplied to the structure or a section thereof and voltage drops are measured between contact points thereon when the structure is in an initial condition and is preferably free from any defects, and wherein similar measurements of voltage drops are performed when using the structure, which measurements are compared with the measurements from the initial condition, characteriz in that the structure or a section thereof is equipped with a comparatively large number of fixed contact points arranged i a pattern with a relatively uniform distribution all over the structure or over the section which is to be monitored, and in that measurements are performed on supplying an electric current through at least two contact points or electrodes on the structure to measure the voltage drop between selected pairs of contact points among an essential portion or all of said contact points, the total picture- of deviations between measurements from the initial condition and those from said performed measurements being included in the detection and localization of any defects. 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the electric current being impressed is a pulse shaped DC with such a low frequency that transients which occur as the current rises or falls, dies before the current alternates again. 16 3.- A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the electric current being impressed is a rectangular wave shaped AC with such a low frequency that transients which occur as th current rises or falls, dies before the current alternates aga 4. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that said voltage drops are measured in such time intervals where transients that occur as the current rises or falls, in substance have died so that mainly the resistive stationary voltage drop is measured. 5. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that an estimation of the actual value is produced by statistic processing in a computer of many measurements on each of said voltage drops. 6. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the electric current is impressed in sequence through two and two mutually far spaced contact points among a selected portion o said number of fixed contact points. 7. A device for performing the method as claimed in claim 1, comprising an electric excitation circuit for impression of a electric current on a metal structure or a section thereof an a measuring circuit for measuring corresponding voltage drops between contact points on the structure, characterized in tha a relatively high number of fixed contact points (41-45) are arranged in a pattern with a relatively uniform distribution o the area to be monitored, that the measuring circuit comprises a multiplexer (40) arranged to perform change-over for measure ment of the voltage drop between selected pairs of the contac points among an essential portion or all of said number of contact points, and that a control unit (33) is arranged to control the course of the impression of an electric current from the electric excitation circuit (34 or 31) and of the change-over of the multiplexer (40) as well as a registration and possible presentation of the measured results. 8. A device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that th control unit comprises a computer (33) arranged to produce a estimation of the actual value by statistic processing of ma measurements on each of said voltage drops. 9. A devise as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that at least a considerable portion of the contact points with associated conducters are constructed and dimensioned so tha they can both serve to measure voltage drops and impress the electric current from the excitation circuit.

Inventors: HOGNESTAD HAOREK, HOGNESTAD, HAOREK
Applicants: SENTRALINST FOR IND FORSKNING, SENTRALINSTITUTT FOR INDUSTRIELL FORSKNING
Application year: 1983
Main classification: G01N27
IPC codes: G01N27