CERTAIN 2-(2-SUBSTITUTED BENZOYL)-1,3-CYCLOHEXANEDIONES

Abstract: Compounds having the structural formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine or iodine; R³ is hydrogen, iodine or chlorine; and R⁵ is hydrogen, halogen, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro, or trifluormethyl as herbicides.

Description: Background of the Invention Compounds having the structural formula wherein X can be an alkyl, n can be 0, 1, or 2, and R₁ can be phenyl or substituted phenyl are described in Japanese Patent Application 84632-1974 as being intermediates for the preparation of herbicidal compounds of the formula wherein R₁, X, and n are as defined above and R₂ is alkyl, alkenyl, or alkynyl. Specifically taught herbicidal compounds of this latter group are those where n is 2, X is 5,5-dimethyl, R₂ is allyl and R₁ is phenyl, 4-chlorophenyl or 4-methoxyphenyl. The precursor intermediates for these three specifically taught compounds have no or almost no herbicidal activity. In contrast, the compounds of this invention have exceptional herbicidal activity. Applicant's compounds must have a halogen substitution in the 2-position of the phenyl moiety of their compounds to obtain the exceptional herbicidal activity. The exact reason why such a substitution imparts exceptional herbicidal activity to the compound is not fully understood. Description of the Invention This invention relates to certain novel 2-(2-substituted benzoyl)-cyclohexane-1,3-diones as herbicides. The compounds of this invention have the following structural formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl, preferably methyl, most preferably R and R¹ are hydrogen, R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine, R³ is hydrogen or halogen, preferably iodine or chlorine, most preferably R³ is hydrogen, and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine, iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, preferably methyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, preferably methoxy, nitro, trifluoromethyl, most preferably R⁴ is hydrogen and 4-chlorine. The compounds of this invention can have the following three structural formulae because of tautomerism: wherein R, R¹, R², R³, and R⁴ are as defined above. In the above description of the compounds of this invention alkyl and alkoxy include both straight and branched configurations; for example, methyl ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl, and tert-butyl. The compounds of this invention are active herbicides of a general type. That is, they are herbicidally effective against a wide range of plant species. The method of controlling undesirable vegetation of the present invention comprises applying an herbicidally effective amount of the above-described compounds to the area where control is desired. The compounds of the present invention can be prepared by the following general method. Generally, mole amounts of the dione and substituted benzoyl cyanide are used, along with a slight mole excess of zinc chloride. The two reactants and the zinc chloride are combined in a solvent such as methylene chloride. A slight mole excess of triethylamine is slowly added to the reaction mixture with cooling. The mixture is stirred at room temperature for 5 hours. The reaction product is worked up by conventional techniques. The above-described substituted benzoyl cyanide can be prepared according to the teaching of T.S. Oakwood and C.A. Weisgerber, Organic Synthesis Collected , Vol. III, pp. 122 (1955). The following example teaches the synthesis of a representative compound of this invention. EXAMPLE I 2-(2,4-Dichlorobenzoyl)-cyclohexane-1,3-dione 1,3-Cyclohexanedione [11.2 grams (g), 0.1 mole], 20.0 g (0.1 mole) 2,4-dichlorobenzoyl cyanide and 13.6 g (0.11 mole) anhydrous, powdered zinc chloride were combined in 100 milliliters (ml) methylene chloride. Triethylamine (10.1 g, 0.12 mole) was slowly added with cooling. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 hours and then poured into 2N hydrochloric acid. The aqueous phase was discarded and the organic phase was washed with 150 ml 5% Na₂CO₃ four times. The aqueous washings were combined and acidified with HCl, extracted with methylene chloride, dried and concentrated to yield 25.3 g of crude product. The crude product was dissolved in ether and stirred with 250 ml of 5% copper (II) acetate. The resulting copper salt was filtered, washed with ether and stirred with 6N hydrochloric acid to destroy the salt. The extract was washed with ether to yield 22.15 grams of the desired product m.p. 138-140°C. (77.7% yield). The structure was confirmed by instrumental analysis. The following is a table of certain selected compounds that are preparable according to the procedure described hereto. Compound numbers are assigned to each compound and are used throughout the remainder of the application. Herbicidal Screening Tests As previously mentioned, the herein described compounds produced in the above-described manner are phytotoxic compounds which are useful and valuable in controlling various plant species. Selected compounds of this invention were tested as herbicides in the following manner. Pre-emergence herbicide test. On the day preceding treatment, seeds of eight different weed species are planted in loamy sand soil in individual rows using one species per row across the width of a flat. The seeds used are green foxtail (FT) ( Setaria viridis ), watergrass (WG) ( Echinochloa crusgalli ), wild oat (WO) ( Avena fatua ), annual morningglory (AMG) ( Ipomoea lacunosa ), velvetleaf (VL) ( Abutilon theophrasti ), Indian mustard (MD ( Brassica juncea ), redroot pigweed (PW) ( Amaranthus retroflexus ), and yellow nutsedge (YNG) ( Cyperus esculentus ). Ample seeds are planted to give about 20 to 40 seedlings per row, after emergence, depending upon the size of the plants. Using an analytical balance, 600 milligrams (mg) of the compound to be tested are weighed out on a piece of glassine weighing paper. The paper and compound are placed in a 60 milliliter (ml) wide-mouth clear bottle and dissolved in 45 ml of acetone or substituted solvent. Eighteen ml of this solution are transferred to a 60 ml wide-mouth clear bottle and diluted with 22 ml of a water and acetone mixture (19:1) containing enough polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate emulsifier to give a final solution of 0.5% (v/v). The solution is then sprayed on a seeded flat on a linear spray table calibrated to deliver 80 gallons per acre (748 L/ha). The application rate is 4 lb/acre (4.48 Kg/ha). After treatment, the flats are placed in the greenhouse at a temperature of 70 to 80°F and watered by sprinkling. Two weeks after treatment, the degree of injury or control is determined by comparison with untreated check plants of the same age. The injury rating from 0 to 100% is recorded for each species as percent control with 0% representing no injury and 100% representing complete control. The results of the tests are shown in the following Table II. Pre-Emergence Herbicidal Activity Application Rate -- 4.48 kg/ha Cmpd. No. FT WG WO AMG VL MD PW YNG 1 100 90 20 40 65 50 35 80 2 80 90 0 30 80 90 20 90 3 0 0 0 40 40 40 0 0 4 100 100 50 35 100 100 90 95 5 100 95 65 35 90 85 50 95 6 50 25 0 25 100 100 35 80 7 80 90 10 60 100 100 100 80 8 95 95 45 40 100 80 95 95 9 95 100 55 30 100 90 100 95 10 100 100 60 20 85 100 100 95 11 85 100 30 40 100 100 100 95 12 85 85 90 75 80 95 90 90 13 85 75 10 10 85 65 95 90 14 40 10 80 0 65 40 65 100 15 40 60 20 30 100 30 75 95 16 80 80 20 55 75 90 40 95 17 20 - 10 25 100 95 85 90 18 65 - 30 70 100 100 85 90 19 45 60 0 30 40 0 20 60 20 30 85 20 40 95 85 40 45 21 80 100 0 80 100 100 95 95 22 20 10 0 20 75 30 45 10 23 45 95 10 0 100 85 100 95 24 - 100 0 25 70 90 - 100 25 - 100 25 80 100 100 - 100 - = Specie did not germinate for some unknown reason. Post-Emergence Herbicide Test : This test is conducted in an identical manner to the testing procedure for the pre-emergence herbicide test, except the seeds of the eight different weed species are planted 10-12 days before treatment. Also, watering of the treated flats is confined to the soil surface and not to the foliage of the sprouted plants. The results of the post-emergence herbicide test are reported in Table III. Post-Emergence Herbicidal Activity Application Rate -- 4.48 kg/ha Cmpd. No. FT WG WO AMG VL MD PW YNG 1 60 70 20 40 60 60 35 60 2 30 70 0 50 90 85 30 80 3 0 30 0 70 100 90 55 70 4 95 98 20 98 100 100 30 95 5 80 80 75 50 60 80 0 95 6 40 40 10 60 100 100 75 65 7 60 75 40 60 100 75 100 75 8 85 80 75 70 95 80 90 90 9 85 80 75 70 95 80 90 90 10 95 85 90 60 95 95 80 95 11 50 80 35 55 100 100 95 80 12 45 75 50 55 75 60 50 80 13 30 60 20 60 80 50 60 70 14 20 10 20 50 45 40 40 0 15 65 95 0 65 95 30 100 80 16 65 80 20 85 85 30 30 80 17 75 80 30 70 100 100 85 90 18 100 95 10 100 100 100 100 90 19 60 80 40 70 100 75 80 90 20 65 80 10 85 95 95 100 70 21 30 55 0 80 100 80 65 80 72 0 30 0 20 45 0 30 20 23 85 90 40 85 100 95 100 90 24 0 80 0 70 90 74 - 100 25 100 100 75 90 100 100 - 100 -- = Specie did not germinate for some reason. The compounds of the present invention are useful as herbicides, especially as pre-emergence herbicides, and can be applied in a variety of ways at various concentrations. In practice, the compounds herein defined are formulated into herbicidal compositions, by admixture, in herbicidally effective amounts, with the adjuvants and carriers normally employed for facilitating the dispersion of active ingredients for agricultural applications, recognizing the fact that the formulation and mode of application of a toxicant may affect the activity of the materials in a given application. Thus, these active herbicidal compounds may be formulated as granules of relatively large particle size, as wettable powders, as emulsifiable concentrates, as powdery dusts, as solutions or as any of several other known types of formulations, depending upon the desired mode of application. Preferred formulations for pre-emergence herbicidal applications are wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates and granules. These formulations may contain as little as about 0.5% to as much as about 95% or more by weight of active ingredient. A herbicidally effective amount depends upon the nature of the seeds or plants to be controlled and the rate of application varies from about 0.05 to approximately 25 pounds per acre, preferably from about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per acre. Wettable powders are in the form of finely divided particles which disperse readily in water or other dispersants. The wettable powder is ultimately applied to the soil either as a dry dust or as a dispersion in water or other liquid. Typical carriers for wettable powders include fuller's earth, kaolin clays, silicas and other readily wet organic or inorganic diluents. Wettable powders normally are prepared to contain about 5% to about 95% of the active ingredient and usually also contain a small amount of wetting, dispersing, or emulsifying agent to facilitate wetting and dispersion. Emulsifiable concentrates are homogeneous liquid compositions which are dispersible in water or other dispersant, and may consist entirely of the active compound with a liquid or solid emulsifying agent, or may also contain a liquid carrier, such as xylene, heavy aromatic naphthal, isophorone and other non-volatile organic solvents. For herbicidal application, these concentrates are dispersed in water or other liquid carrier and normally applied as a spray to the area to be treated. The percentage by weight of the essential active ingredient may vary according to the manner in which the composition is to be applied, but in general comprises about 0.5% to 95% of active ingredient by weight of the herbicidal composition. Granular formulations wherein the toxicant is carried on relatively coarse particles, are usually applied without dilution to the area in which suppression of vegetation is desired. Typical carriers for granular formulations include sand, fuller's earth, bentonite clays, vermiculite, perlite and other organic or inorganic materials which absorb or which may be coated with the toxicant. Granular formulations normally are prepared to contain about 5% to about 25% of active ingredients which may include surface-active agents such heavy aromatic naphthas, kerosene or other petroleum fractions, or vegetable oils; and/or stickers such as destrins, glue or synthetic resins. Typical wetting, dispersing or emulsifying agents used in agricultural formulations include, for example, the alkyl and alkylaryl sulfonates and sulfates and their sodium salts; polyhydric alcohols; and other types of surface-active agents, many of which are available in commerce. The surface-active agent, when used, normally comprises from 0.1% to 15% by weight of the herbicidal composition. Dusts, which are free-flowing admixtures of the active ingredient with finely divided solids such as talc, clays, flours and other organic and inorganic solids which act as dispersants and carriers for the toxicant, are useful formulations for soil-incorporating application. Pastes, which are homogeneous suspensions of a finely divided solid toxicant in a liquid carrier such as water or oil, are employed for specific purposes. These formulations normally contain about 5% to about 95% of active ingredient by weight, and may also contain small amounts of a wetting, dispersing or emulsifying agent to facilitate dispersion. For application, the pastes are normally diluted and applied as a spray to the area to be affected. Other useful formulations for herbicidal applications include simple solutions of the active ingredient in a dispersant in which it is completely soluble at the desired concentration, such as acetone, alkylated naphthalenes, xylene and other organic solvents. Pressurized sprays, typically aerosols, wherein the active ingredient is dispersed in finely-divided form as a result of vaporization of a low boiling dispersant solvent carrier, such as the Freons, may also be used. The phytotoxic compositions of this invention are applied to the plants in the conventional manner. Thus, the dust and liquid compositions can be applied to the plant by the use of power-dusters, boom and hand sprayers and spray dusters. The compositions can also be applied from airplanes as a dust or a spray because they are effective in very low dosages. In order to modify or control growth of germinating seeds or emerging seedlings, as a typical example, the dust and liquid compositions are applied to the soil according to conventional methods and are distributed in the soil to a depth of at least 1/2 inch below the soil surface. It is not necessary that the phytotoxic compositions be admixed with the soil particles since these compositions can also be applied merely by spraying or sprinkling the surface of the soil. The phytotoxic compositions of this invention can also be applied by addition to irrigation water supplied to the field to be treated. This method of application permits the penetration of the compositions into the soil as the water is absorbed therein. Dust compositions, granular compositions or liquid formulations applied to the surface of the soil can be distributed below the surface of the soil by conventional means such as discing, dragging or mixing operations. The phytotoxic compositions of this invention can also contain other additaments, for example, fertilizers, pesticides and the like, used as adjuvant or in combination with any of the abovedescribed adjuvants. Other phytotoxic compounds useful in combination with the abovedescribed compounds include, for example, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acids, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid and the salts, esters and amides thereof, triazine derivatives, such as 2,4-bis-(3-methoxypropylamino)-6-methylthio-s-triazine, 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine, and 2-ethylamino-4-isopropyl-amino-6-methyl-mercapto-s-triazine; urea derivatives, such as 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea; and acetamides such as N,N-diallyl-α-chloroacetamide, and the like; benzoic acids such as 3-amino-2,5-dichlorogbenaoic acid; thiocarbamates such as S-propyl N,N-dipropytlthiocarbamate, S-ethyl N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate, S-ethyl cyclohexylethyl thiocarbamate, S-ethyl hexahydro-1H-azepine-1-carbothioate and the like; anilines such as 4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-substituted aniline, 4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-N,Ndi-n-propyl aniline and 4-trifluoromethyl-2,6-dinitro-N-ethyl-N,N-di-n-butyl aniline. Fertilizers useful in combination with the active ingredients include, for example, ammonium nitrate, urea and superphosphate. Other useful additaments include materials in which plant organisms take root and grow such as compost, manure, humus, sand, and the like.

Claims: Claims for the following Contracting States : BE, CH, DE, FR, GB, IT, LI, NL, SE A compound having the structural formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine or iodine; R³ is hydrogen or halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro, or trifluoromethyl. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or methyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, nitro or trifluoromethyl. The compound of Claim 2 wherein R⁴ is substituted at the 4- or 5-position. The compound of Claim 2 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; and R⁴ is 4-chlorine, 5-chlorine, 4-nitro, 5-CF₃ or hydrogen. The compound of Claim 4 wherein R² is chlorine. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is methyl, R¹ is methyl, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 4-chlorine. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 5-trifluoromethyl. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 4-chlorine. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 4-methoxy. The compound of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 4-bromine. The method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying to the area where control is desired, an herbicidally effective amount of a compound having the formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen or halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro, or trifluoromethyl. The method of Claim 14 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or methyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, nitro or trifluoromethyl. The method of Claim 15 wherein R⁴ is substitued at the 4- or 5-position. The method of Claim 15 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; and R⁴ is 4-chlorine, 5-chlorine, 4-nitro, 5-CF₃ or hydrogen. The method of Claim 15 wherein R² is chlorine. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is methyl, R¹ is methyl, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 4-chlorine. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 5-trifluoromethyl. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 4-chlorine. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 4-methoxy. The method of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 4-bromine. A herbicidal composition comprising a compound having the structural formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen or halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro or trifluoromethyl, and an inert carrier therefor. Claims for the following Contracting State : AT A process for preparing compounds having the structural formula I wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen or halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro, or trifluoromethyl, comprising reacting a substituted dione of the general formula II with a substituted benzoyl cyanide of the general formula III and working up the reaction product by conventional techniques. The process of Claim 1 wherein R and R ¹ are hydrogen or methyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, nitro or trifluoromethyl. The process of Claim 2 wherein R⁴ is substituted at the 4- or 5-position. The compound of Claim 2 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; and R⁴ is 4-chlorine, 5-chlorine, 4-nitro, 5-CF₃ or hydrogen. The process of Claim 4 wherein R² is chlorine. The process of Claim 1 wherein R is methyl, R¹ is methyl, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The process of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 4-chlorine. The process of Claim 1 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen or 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 6-chlorine, 5-trifluoromethyl, 4-chlorine, 4-methoxy, or 4-bromine. The method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying to the area where control is desired, an herbicidally effective amount of a compound having the formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen, halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro, or trifluoromethyl. The method of Claim 9 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or methyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, nitro or trifluoromethyl and wherein R⁴ is substituted at the 4- or 5-position. The method of Claim 9 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; and R⁴ is 4-chlorine, 5-chlorine, 4-nitro, 5-CF₃ or hydrogen. The method of Claim 9 wherein R is hydrogen or methyl; R¹ is hydrogen or methyl; R² is 2-chlorine; R³ is hydrogen or 3-chlorine; and R⁴ is 6-chlorine, 5-trifluoromethyl, 4-chlorine, 4-methoxy or 4-bromine. A process for preparing a herbicidal composition comprising mixing a herbicidally active amount of a compound having the structural formula I wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen, halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro or trifluoromethyl, and an inert carrier therefor. A compound having the structural formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen, halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro, or trifluoromethyl. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or methyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, nitro or trifluoromethyl. The compound of Claim 15 wherein R⁴ is substituted at the 4- or 5-position. The compound of Claim 15 wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen; and R⁴ is 4-chlorine, 5-chlorine, 4-nitro, 5-CF₃ or hydrogen. The compound of Claim 17 wherein R² is chlorine. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is methyl, R¹ is methyl, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 4-chlorine. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 6-chlorine. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 5-trifluoromethyl. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 4-chlorine. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is 3-chlorine and R⁴ is 4-methoxy. The compound of Claim 14 wherein R is hydrogen, R¹ is hydrogen, R² is 2-chlorine, R³ is hydrogen and R⁴ is 4-bromine. A herbicidal composition comprising a compound having the structural formula wherein R and R¹ are hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl; R² is chlorine, bromine, or iodine; R³ is hydrogen, halogen; and R⁴ is hydrogen, chlorine, bromine or iodine, C₁-C₄ alkyl, C₁-C₄ alkoxy, nitro or trifluoromethyl, and an inert carrier therefor.

Inventors: KRAATZ, GARY WAYNE, MICHAELY, WILLIAM JAMES
Applicants: STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1983
Main classification: C07C49
IPC codes: C07C49, C07C45, A01N35, A01N33