INSECTICIDAL SYNERGISTIC MIXTURES OF O,O-DIETHYL O-(3,5,6-TRICHLORO-2-PYRIDINYL)PHOSPHOROTHIOATE AND O,O-DIMETHYL-S-(N-METHYLCARBAMOYLMETHYL)PHOSPHOROTHIOATE AND METHOD OF KILLING AND CONTROLLING INSECTS

Abstract: Insecticidal compositions containing a mixture of O,O-­ diethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)phosphorothioate and O,O-dimethyl-S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl)phosphoro­ thioate are disclosed. Such compositions are useful in the kill and control of insects, particularly insects of the Lepidoptera order and especially of the genera Heliothis, Spodoptera and Laspeyresia.

Description: INSECTICIDAL SYNERGISTIC MIXTURES OF O,O-DIETHYL 0-(3,5,6-TRICHLORO-2-PYRIDINYL)PHOSPHOROTHIOATE AND O,O-DIMETHYL-S-(N-METHYLCARBAMOYLMETHYL)PHOSPHOROTHIOATE AND METHOD OF KILLING AND CONTROLLING INSECTS. The present invention is directed to new insecticidal compositions which are useful in the kill and control of insects particularly insects of the Lepidoptera order and especially of the genera Heliothis, Spodoptera and Laspeyresia. These compositions comprise mixtures of O,O-diethyl 0-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)phosphorothioate and O,O-dimethyl-S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl)phosphorothioate. It has been found that the toxic ingredients of said compositions are mutually activating. The new insecticidal composition of the present invention comprises 1 part by weight of O,O-diethyl 0- (3,5, 6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)phosphoro- thioate and from 1/64 to 1/2 part by weight of O,O-dimethyl-S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl)phosphorothioate, i.e., a ratio of 33:1 to 2:1. A preferred ratio is from 8:1 to 1:1 with the most preferred ratio being from 8:1 to 2:1. These insecticidal compositions are especially effective in killing and controlling insects, particularly Lepidoptera, especially Heliothis, Spodoptera and Laspeyresia species, which infest crops such as corn, soybeans, tobacco and particularly cotton. The mixtures of active compounds of the present invention have been found to possess good activity against Heliothis, Spodoptera and Laspeyresia species. Accordingly, the present invention also comprises methods for controlling such insects and/or their habitats with a pesticidally effective amount of the active compound mixture. For such uses the unmodified active materials of the present invention can be employed. However, the present invention embraces the use of an insecticidally-effective amount of the active materials in admixture with an inert material, as an adjuvant or carrier therefor, in solid or liquid form. Thus, for example, the active mixture can be dispersed on a finely divided solid and employed therein as a dust. Also, the active mixture, as liquid concentrates or solid compositions comprising the active mixture, can be dispersed in water, typically with the aid of a wetting agent, and the resulting aqueous dispersion employed as a spray. In other procedures, the active mixture can be employed as a constituent of organic liquid compositions, oil-in-water and water -in-oil emulsions, or water dispersions, with or without the addition of wetting, dispersing, or emulsifying agents. Suitable adjuvants of the foregoing type are well known to those skilled in the art. The methods of applying the solid or liquid pesticidal formulations similarly are well known to the skilled artisan. As organic solvents used as extending agents there can be employed hydrocarbons, e.g. benzene, toluene, xylene, kerosene, diesel fuel, fuel oil, and petroleum naphtha, ketones such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone and cyclohexanone, chlorinated hydrocarbons such as carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, trichloroethylene, and perchloroethylene, esters such as ethyl acetate, amyl acetate and butyl acetate, ethers, e.g., ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, alcohols, e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, amyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, butyl carbitol acetate and glycerine. Mixtures of water and organic solvents, either as solutions or emulsions, can be employed. The active mixtures can also be applied as aerosols, e.g., by dispersing them in air by means of a compressed gas such as dichlorodifluoromethane or trichlorofluoromethane and other such materials. The active mixture of the present invention can also be applied with adjuvants or carriers such as talc, pyrophyllite, synthetic fine silica, attapulgus clay, kieselguhr, chalk, diatomaceous earth, lime, calcium carbonate, bentonite, fuller's earth, cottonseed hulls, wheat flour, soybean flour, pumice, tripoli, wood flour, -walnut shell flour, redwood flour and lignin. As stated, it is frequently desirable to incorporate a surface active agent in the compositions of the present invention. Such surface active or wetting agents are advantageously employed in both the solid and liquid compositions. The surface active agent can be anionic, cationic or nonionic in character. Typical classes of surface active agents include alkyl sulfonate salts, alkylaryl sulfonate salts, alkylaryl polyether alcohols, fatty acid esters of polyhydric alcohols and the alkylene oxide addition products of such esters, and addition products of long chain mercaptans and alkylene oxides. Typical examples of such surface active agents include the sodium alkylbenzene sulfonates having 10 to 18 carbon atoms in the alkyl group, alkylphenol ethylene oxide condensation products, e.g., p-isooctylphenol condensed with 10 ethylene oxide units, soaps, e.g., sodium stearate and potassium oleate, sodium salt of propylnaphthalene sulfonic acid, di(2-ethylhexyl)-ester of sodium sulfosuccinic acid, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium decane sulfonate, sodium salt of the sulfonated monoglyceride of coconut fatty acids, sorbitan sesquioleate, lauryl trimethyl ammonium chloride, octadecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, polyethylene glycol lauryl ether, polyethylene glycol esters of fatty acids and rosin acids, e.g., Ethofat 7 and 13, sodium N-methyl-N-oleyl taurate, Turkey Red Oil, sodium dibutyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium lignin sulfonate, polyethylene glycol stearate, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate tertiary dodecyl polyethylene glycol thioether (nonionic 218), long chain ethylene oxide-propylene oxide condensation products, e.g., Pluronic 61 (molecular weight 1000), polyethylene glycol ester of tall oil acids, sodium octyl phenoxyethoxyethyl sulfate, tris(polyoxyethylene)-sorbitan monostearate (tweeny 60), and sodium dihexyl sulfosuccinate. The concentration of the active mixtures in liquid formulations generally is from 0.01 to 95 percent by weight or more. Concentrations of from 0.1 to 50 weight percent are often employed. In formulations to be employed as concentrates, the active materials can be present in a concentration of from 5 to 98 weight percent. In dusts or dry formulations, the concentration of the active ingredient can be from 0.01 to 95 weight percent or more; concentrations of from 0.1 to 50 weight percent are often conveniently employed. The active compositions can also contain other compatible additaments, for example, plant growth regulants, pesticides and the like. The present compositions can be applied by the use of power-dusters, boom and hand sprayers, spray-dusters and by other conventional means. The compositions can also be applied from airplanes as a dust or a spray. The active mixtures of this invention are usually applied at an approximate rate of from 1/16 pound to 5 pounds or more per acre (0.07 to 5.6 kg/hectare), but lower or higher rates may be appropriate in some cases. A preferred application rate is from 1/2 pound to 2 pounds per acre (0.56 to 2.24 kg/hectare). The following examples further illustrate the present invention. In the examples, all parts are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Example I A study was conducted to determine the effectiveness and synergistic response of various combinations of O,O-diethyl 0-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)phosphoro thioate and OtO-dimethyl-S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl)- phosphorothioate in the control of Heliothis insects. Test solutions were prepared by admixing predetermined amounts of each of the above compounds in predetermined amounts of water containing predetermined amounts of acetone and Tritone X155 surfactant. Tobacco leaf discs, 3 inches (7.62 cm) in diameter were dipped into one of the above mixtures and placed in an open petri dish to dry. After the leaf discs were dry, 5 late second instar (approximately 3-day old) tobacco bud worms (Heliothis virescens) were placed in each dish and the dishes covered. All treatments were run in triplicate and on two different days. Mortality was recorded 48 hours after treatment with moribund larvae unable to crawl their own body length being counted as dead. In this test method, intoxication occurred through contact with and feeding upon treated plants. The results of this study are set forth below in Table I. Test Amount Amount Ratio of No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical (3) in ppm A to B 1 - - - - 2 A 12.5 - - 3 A 25 - - 4 A 50 - - 5 A 100 - - 6 - - B 50 7 - - B 100 8 - - B 200 9 - - B 400 10 - - B 800 - Table I Expected Atual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 1 - 0 2 - 7 3 - 13 4 - 43 5 - 73 6 - 0 7 - 0 8 - 7 9 - 10 10 - 33 - TABLE I (Continued) Test Amount Amount Ratio of No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical (3) in ppm A to B 11 A 12.5 B 50 1:4 12 A 12.5 B 100 1:8 13 A 12.5 B 100 1:16 14 A 12.5 B 400 1:32 15 A 25 B 50 1:2 16 A 25 B 100 1:4 17 A 25 B 200 1: :8 TABLE I (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 11 7 10 43 12 7 10 43 13 14 20 43 14 16 20 25 15 13 23 77 16 13 20 54 17 19 30 58 TABLE I Test Amount Amount Ratio of No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical (3) in ppm A to B 18 A 25 B 400 1:76 19 A 25 B 800 1:32 20 A 50 B 50 1:1 21 A 50 B 100 1:2 22 A 50 B 200 1:4 23 A 50 B 400 1:8 24 A 50 B 800 1:16 25 A 100 B 50 2:1 26 A 100 B 100 1: :1 TABLE I (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control 18 22 27 35 19 42 40 0 20 43 37 0 21 43 33 0 22 47 57 21 23 49 37 0 24 62 50 0 25 73 80 10 26 73 83 13 TABLE I (Continued) Test Amount Amount Ratio of No. (1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical (3) in ppm A to b 27 A 100 B 200 1:2 28 A 100 B 400 1:4 29 A 100 B 800 1:8 TABLE I (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 27 75 83 11 28 76 80 5 29 82 77 0 (1) Test Nos. 1-10 are control runs with test 1 being a no chemical control (surfactant/acetone/water alone). (2) Chemical A represents O,O-diethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl) phosphorothioate. (3) Chemical B represents O,O-dimethyl-S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl) phosphorothioate. (4) Expected control = % control by chemical A+% control by chemical B minus (-) % control by chemical Ax% control chemical B 100 (5) Percent increase over expected control equals actual control x 100-100 expected control Example II A study was conducted to determine the effectiveness and synergistic response of various combinations of O,O-diethyl 0-(3,5,6-trichloro-2pyridinyl)phosphorothioate and O,O-dimethyl-S-(N -methylcarbamoylmethyl)phosphorothioate in the control of Spodoptera insects. Test solutions were prepared by admixing predetermined amounts of each of the above compounds in predetermined amounts of water containing predetermined amounts of acetone and Tritone X155 surfactant. Tobacco leaf discs, 3 inches (7.62 cm) in diameter were dipped into one of the above mixtures and placed in an open petri dish to dry. After the leaf discs were dry, 5 late second instar (approximately 3-day old) beet armyworm larvae (Spodoptera exigua) were placed in each dish and the dishes covered. All treatments were run in triplicate and on two different days. Mortality was recorded 48 hours after treatment with moribund larvae unable to crawl their own body length being counted as dead. In this test method, intoxication occurred through contact with and feeding upon treated plants. The results of this study are set forth below in Table II. TABLE II Test Amount Amount Ratio of No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical (3) in ppm A to B 1 - - - - 2 A 3.1 - - 3 A 6.2 - - 4 A 12.5 - - 5 A 25 - - 6 - - B 25 7 - - B 50 8 - - B 100 9 - - B 200 10 - - B 400 - TA TABLE II Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control 1 - 0 2 - 7 3 - 30 4 - 80 5 - 87 6 - 0 7 - 0 8 - 0 9 - 0 10 - 7 - TABLE II (Continued) Test Amount Amount Ratio of No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical (3) in ppm A to B 11 A 3.1 B 25 1:8 12 A 3.1 B 50 1:16 13 A 3.1 B 100 1:32 14 A 3.1 B 200 1:64 15 A 3.1 B 400 1:128 16 A 6.2 B 25 1:1 17 A 6.2 B 50 1:2 18 A 6.2 B 100 1: :4 TABLE II (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent In Percent Expected Control (5) 11 7 33 371 12 7 10 42 13 7 23 228 14 7 30 328 15 14 30 114 16 30 50 67 17 30 60 100 18 30 57 90 TABLE II (Continued) Test (2) Amount (3) Amount Ratio of No.(1) Chemical in ppm Chemical in ppm A to B 19 A 6.2 B 200 1:8 20 A 6.2 B 400 1:16 21 A 12.5 B 25 1:2 22 A 12.5 B 50 1:4 23 A 12.5 B 100 1:8 24 A 12.5 B 200 1:16 25 A 12.5 B 400 1:32 26 A 25 B 25 1:1 27 A 25 B 50 1: :2 TABLE II (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No. (1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 19 30 73 143 20 35 53 51 21 80 90 13 22 80 87 9 23 80 100 25 24 80 97 21 25 81 93 15 26 87 100 15 27 87 100 15 TABLE II (Continued) Test Amount Amount Ratio of No.(I) Chemical(2) in ppm Chemical(3) in ppm A to B 28 A 25 B 100 1:4 29 A 25 B 200 1:8 30 A 25 B 400 1:16 TABLE II (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 28 87 100 15 29 87 100 15 30 88 100 14 (1) Test Nos. 1-10 are control runs with Test 1 being a no chemical control (surfactant/acetone/water alone). (2) Chemical A represents 0,0-diethyl S-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)phosphorothioate. (3) Chemical B represents 0,0-dimethyl S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl)phosphorothioate. (4) Expected control = % control by chemical A + % control by chemical B minus (-) % control by chemical A x % control chemical B 100 (5) Percent increase over expected control equals actual control x 100-100 expected control Example III A study was conducted to determine the effectiveness and synergistic response of various combinations of O,O-diethyl 0-(3,5,6-trichloro-2pyridinyl)phosphorothioate and O,O-dimethyl-S- - (N-methylcarbamoylmethyl )phosphorothioate in the control of Laspeyresia insects. Test solutions were prepared by admixing predetermined amounts of each of the above compounds in predetermined amounts of water containing predetermined amounts of acetone and Tritone X155 surfactant. At the same time, a water/surfactant mixture containing none of the compounds was also prepared to serve as a control. Sheets containing egg masses of codling moths (Laspeyresia pomonella) are pinned to apples and the egg sheets and apples are drenched with an aqueous dispersion of one of the hereinafter set forth compounds. Separate egg masses on apples were also treated with the control mixture. The egg masses/ apples were incubated under conditions conducive to the hatching of the eggs and the growth of the larvae therefrom. Ten days after treatment, the apples were examined for the presence of larvae. Counts of the number of larvae penetration in the treated fruit were compared to the number present in the control to determine the present control obtained with the test compounds. The results of this examination are set forth below in Table III. TABLE III Test Amount Amount Ratio No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical(3) in ppm A to B 1 - - - - 2 A 3.1 - - 3 A 6.2 - - 4 A 12.5 - - 5 A 25 - - 6 - - B 25 7 - - B 50 9 - - B 200 10 - - B 400 - TABLE III Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 1 - 0 2 - 13 3 - 25 4 - 47 5 - 70 6 - 14 7 - 26# 8 - 37 9 - 48 10 - 54 - TABLE III (Continued) Test Amount Amount Ratio No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical(3) in ppm A to B 11 A 3.1 B 25 1:8 12 A 3.1 B 50 1:16 13 A 3.1 B 100 1:32 14 A 3.1 B 200 1:64 15 A 3.1 B 400 1:128 16 A 6.2 B 25 1:4 17 A 6.2 B 50 1:8 18 A 6.2 B 100 1: :16 TABLE III (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 11 25 27 8 12 36 38 5 13 45 58 29 14 55 56 2 15 60 72 20 16 36 38 6 17 45 64 42 18 53 55 4 TABLE III (Continued) Test Amount Amount Ratio No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical(3) in ppm A to B 19 A 6.2 B 200 1:32 20 A 6.2 B 400 1:64 21 A 12.5 B 25 1:2 22 A 12.5 B 50 1:4 23 A 12.5 B 100 1:8 24 A 12.5 B 200 1:16 25 A 12.5 B 400 1:32 26 A 25 B 25 1:1 27 A 25 B 50 1: :2 TABLE III (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 19 61 75 23 20 66 75 14 21 54 62 15 22 61 56 0 23 67 57 0 24 72 80 11 25 76 85 12 26 74 77 4 27 78 77 0 TABLE III (Continued) Test Amount Amount Ratio No.(1) Chemical (2) in ppm Chemical(3) in ppm A to B 28 A 25 B 200 1:4 29 A 25 B 100 1:8 30 A 25 B 400 1:16 TABLE III (Continued) Expected Actual Test Control Control Percent Increase Over No.(1) in Percent (4) in Percent Expected Control (5) 28 81 64 0 29 84 85 1 30 86 90 5 (1) Test Nos. 1-10 are control runs with Test 1 being a no chemical control (surfactant/acetone/water alone). (2) Chemical A represents 0,0-diethyl S-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)phosphorothioate. (3) Chemical B represents 0,0-dimethyl S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl)phosphorothioate. (4) Expected control = % control by chemical A + % control by chemical B minus (-) % control by chemical A x % control chemical B 100 (5) Percent increase over expected control equals actual control x 100-100 expected control Data from Tables I, II and III illustrates that better control was obtained employing the two toxicants together than would be expected from the results obtained from employing each of the two toxicants alone. These data are obtained according to the technique described in Colby, "Calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations", Weeds, Vol. 15 (1967) pages 20-22 and Colby, "Greenhouse Evaluation of Herbicide Combinations", Proc. NEWCC, No. 19, pages 312-320.

Claims: CLAIMS : 1. synergistic insecticidal composition which comprises a mixture of toxicants consisting essentially of 1 part by weight of O,O-d;*ethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2- pyridinyl)phosphorothtoate and from 1264 to 1J2 part by weight of O,O-dimethyl-S-(N-methylcarbamoylmethyl) phosphorothioate. 2. A composition as claimed in Claim 1 which includes an inert carrier. 3. A composition as claimed in Claim 2 wherein the carrier is an inert liquid carrier. 4. A composition as claimed in Claim 2 or claim 3 wherein the mixture of toxicants is present in an amount of from 0.01 to 95 percent by weight of the total composition. 5. A composition as claimed in Claim 2 or Claim 3 wherein the composition is present as an aqueous dispersion and the mixture of toxicants is present in an amount of from 0.1 to 50 percent by weight of the total composition. 6. A method for killing and controlling insects which comprise contacting the insects or their habitat with an insecticidally-effective amount of a composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims. 7. A method as claimed in Claim 6 wherein the insects are of the genus Hel=othis. 8. A method as claimed in Claim 6 wherein the insects are of the genus Spodoptera, 9. A method as claimed in Claim 6 wherein the insects are of the genus Laspeyresia. 10. A method as claimed in any one of Claims 6 to 9 wherein the composition is employed in an amount of from 1716 pound to 5 pounds per acre (0.07 to 5.6 kg/hectare).

Inventors: LARSON, LARRY LEVERNE
Applicants: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1982
Main classification: A01N57
IPC codes: A01N57