METHOD OF MODIFYING STARCH BY UHF RADIATION

Abstract: Starch with from 4% to 60% by weight of water is subject­ ed to UHF radiation, preferably of 2450 MHz for up to 15 mi­ nutes, under conditions such that the starch reaches a maxi­ mum temperature no greater than 100°C and is not significant­ ly gelatinized. The treated starch has a crystallinity not more than half that of the untreated starch, and may have improved rheology, hot water dispersibility and susceptibility to amylolyt­ ic enzyme attack.

Description: METHOD OF MODIFYING STARCH BY UHF RADIATION This invention relates to a method of modifying starch which involves the use of UHF (ultra-high frequency) radiation. Our co-pending British Patent Application 8013630 describes a method of chemically modifying starch which involves sitting a mixture of starch and a reagent which reacts chemically with the starch to the action of UHF radiation. By contrast, the method of the present invention does not involve chemically reacting the starch with anything. Starch has previously been subjected to UHF radiation for various purposes. UHF radiation has been used for heating or drying, at temperatures above 100 C, but no modification of structure or properties has been sought or reported. UHF radiation has been used for cooking or pre-cooking starch; by contrast the method of the present invention does nct involve gelatinization of starch. UPF radiation has been used to heat gelatinized starch prior to hydrolysis; by contrast, the method of the present invention is concerned solely with native (ungelatinized) starch. Starch has also been subjected to other treatments in order to modify its properties. Dextrinization involves treatment of starch at high temperature and low moisture content, and effects both decomposition of the starch chain and polymerization of the decomposition products; the resulting product is no longer a trunstarch. Drying on rollers and extrusion treatments produce exclusively gelatinized starch. Treatment of starch under high pressure and low temperature lias been studied in the l.boratory; this results in a statlstical d-pol-r- ization of the starch chain and a total destruction of the structure of the starch granules, so that again the product is not a true starch. Heat moisture treatment involves submitting native starch at a water content generally in the range l3-3O? to a temperature of the order of 800C for several hours. No study has been made of the crystalline regions, but it is known that the X-Ray spectra of certain starches (e.g. potato starch) can be modified by heat-moisture treatment, whereas no modification of this kind is noted with normal maize starch. It is thus probable that there is some re-arrangement of the crystalline regions, but that heat-moisture treatment is not capable of reducing or destroying these regions. By contrast, UHF treatment according to the method of this invention is effected very quickly, and does result in reduction or dectruction of the crystalline regions of the starch, with desirable results as described below. In one aspect the present invention provides a method of modifying starch, which method comprises subjecting a starting mixture of starch and water, containing from 4Z to 60% by weight of water on the combined weight of starch and water, to UHF radiation under conditions chosen so that the starch reaches a maximum temperature of no greater than 1000C and is not significantly gelatinized, and recovering a starch having a crystallinity not more than half that of the untreated starch, In another aspect, the invention provides starch modified by treatment with UHF radiation, said starch being not significantly gelatinized and having a crystallinity not more than half that of the untreated starch. The nature of the starch used is not critical. Suitable starches include corn starch, potato starch, wheat starch, tapioca starch, rice starch, sorghum starch, waxy corn starch and waxy sorghum starch. The starch may be used in a mixture with other materials, for example in the form of flour, though this is not preferred. However, no material is present which reacts chemically with the starch under the conditions of treatment, since the invention involves the recovery of a starch rather than a starch derivative. The starch is in the native, i.e. granular, state at both the start and the end of the method; conditions of treatment are chosen such that there is no significant gelatinization of starch. If the treated starch is made up into an aqueous slurry, for enzymatic hydrolysis or other further treatment, it is desirable that the slurry should have a viscosity such that it is easily handled. If substantial gelatinization has taken place during UHF radiation treatment, then the aqueous slurry may have an inconveniently high viscosity. The moisture content of the starch at the start of the treatment is generally in the range of 4-60%, preferably 10-40%, by weight of the starting material. The final moisture content will unavoidably be somewhat less than the starting moisture content, because the UHF treatment involves heating, but the drying effect of the UHF radiation should preferably be minimised. The effect of treatment with UHF radiation is more marked on starch containing-at least 25% by weight of moisture. It may nevertheless sometimes be preferred to use starch COflt iin- ing less than 255 by weight of moisture in order to avoid mould or fermentation problems. At high water contents, the process becomes less efficient because an increasing proportion of the UHF radiation energy is absorbed by the free water. For this reason, the moisture content is generally held at no more than 50% by weight. Conveniently, starch filter cake of 32-35% moisture content may be used as the starting material. The temperature of the starch necessarily rises during treatment, but is kept below 100 C. Also, the temperature is not allowed to rise to such an extent that the starch becomes significantly gelatinized; the temperature at which this occurs depends on the moisture content of the starch. UHF radiation has a frequency in the range of 300 MHz to 300,000 MHz. Within this range, only certain specific bands are permitted for industrial use in many countries, and these include 915, 2450, 5800 and 22155 MHz. The frequency corresponding best to the activation energy of the H-OH dipole of the starch chain is the frequency 2450 MHz. It is believed that this activation results in orientation of the dipoles in the alternating radiation field, and that the oscillation which results breaks labile bonds whose presence makes the crystalline regions of starch granules so difficult to attack. The time for which it is necessary to treat the starch to obtain the desired characteristics depends on various factors including the power available per unit weight of starch, the configuration of the sample being treated, and the temperature to which it is possible to subject to the starch. Ordirll, the tie of exposure to the UHF radiation will be from 20 seconds to 10 or possibly 15 minutes, preferably less than 5 minutes, and often less than 1 minute. The actual duration of UHF treatment will depend upon moisture content and microwave power of the equipment. The nature of the equipment used is not critical. Conveniently such equipment may comprise a tunnel whose cavity forms-a wave-guide for the UHF radiation and whose dimensions may determine the frequency of the radiation. Such equipment is commercially available from Industrie Microondes Internationale under the Trade Mark Gigatron. The starch material may be passed through the tunnel on a conveyor belt, and the starch material thus treated can be bagged directly. Alternatively, the starch material may be placed in sacks or containers of a suitable material before treatment, and the sacks or containers themselves subjected to the UHF radiation. The alternative is only possible if the temperature during the treatment does not reach a level;which damages the sacks or containers. An effect achieved by the method of the present invention is the reduction or complete destruction of crystalline regions contained in the starch granules. It is known that these crystalline regions ifl various types of starch determine the structure of the starch granules and confer on them specific properties (rheological, reactivity to chemical agents and enzymes, swelling temperature, dispersibility). The reduction or destruction of these regions by means of UHF radiation results in native starches having specific modified properties (e.g. better rheological stability, lower peak viscosity, higher swelling temperature, improved hot water dispersibility, greater reactivity with chemical agents and enzymes). Crystallinity of starch may be determined by a measurement of specific volume (H.N. Dengate et al, Starch, 30 (1978) No.3, pages 80-84) followed by a calculation described by S Nara in Die Staerke, 31(1979) No. 3, pages 73-75. Knowning the specific volume of the starch under examination, the crystallinity X may be calculated using the formula X n Va - Vo Va - Vc where Va is the specific volume of the amorphous portion Vc is the specific volume of the crystalline portion Vo is the specific volume of the starch under examination. For different kinds of starch: Va Vc Maize starch 0.687 0.629 Potato starch 0.673 0.629 Waxy maize starch 0.673 0.629 Tapioca starch 0.684 0.629 According to S Nara the proportion of crystalline material in native starch is in the range from .3 to .47 of the total starch de?eoc¯no on the source of the starch, the remaining material being amorphous. Specifically, the crystallinity of corn starch is 0.42 and of potato starch 0.34. To achieve a significant modification of properties by UHF radiation treatment, it is normally desirable to reduce the crystallinity of the starting material by at least 50%. As shown in the examples which follow it is very easy by UHF treatment to reduce the crvstallinity to less than 0.1, even down to 0.0. A characteristic feature of UHF radiation treatment is that, though the crystallinity of the starch is reduced or destroyed, the granular nature of the starch is not modified. It is believed that UHF treatment may result in breaking some branches at the rr l 6 linkages; that is to say, the side chains border to the main chains may be separated and thus made more accessible to the action of chemical reagents or enzymes. Only an activation of the H-OH dipoles could cause this kind of result without entailing the complete destruction of the structure of the granule within a reasonably short time at a temperature below 1000C. Gelatinization maybe determined by the following test. A 25 g sample of the starch is slurried in 100 ml of water at ambient temperature. The suspension is filtered on a paper filter and the filtrate examined. If the non-volatile content of the filtrate weighs less than 1.3 g, then the starch is said to be not significantly gelatinized. In the examples which follow, Brabender viscosities are reported. A Brabender viscosity is measured aground a cycle of heating and cooling of the starch milk in an appropriate apparatus. Heating and cooling are effected at 1.5 C per minute, and the cycle is as follows: Time (minutes) 0 30 40 70 80 Temperature (OC) 50 95 95 50 50 During the rise of temperature, the starch milk reaches, after several minutes, its swelling temperature, that is to say the granules of starch start to absorb water in their structure. The registered viscosity rises progressively. After several further minutes, the internal bonds which maintain the stability of the granules are broken. The granules fall apart. The viscosity ceases to rise and very soon diminishes gradually as the temperature continues to rise to 95 C. One notes the peak viscosity and peak temperature. After a pause at 95 C, the paste thus prepared is cooled at 1.50C per minute at 5000 and maintained at that temperature of 10 minutes. During this operation the viscosity rises progressively as the temperature diminishes, to reach, during the holding period at 50 C, a value characteristic of retrogradation. All varieties of starch exhibit a reduction in Brabender peak viscosity as a result of UHF radiation treatment according to this invention. If treatment is continued for sufficient time, the Brabender peak simply disappears; that is to say, the viscosity does not fall at any stage along the Brabender profile. Starches treated according to this invention preferably have either no Brabender peak viscosity or a Brabender peak viscosity not more than half that of the untreated starch. The effect of UHF radiation treatment on retrogradation viscosity is more varied; that of corn starch and waxy corn starch is reduced; that of potato starch is generally increased depending on the conditions; that of tapioca starch is not greatly altered. The effects may be of value in different ways, depending on the use to which the treated starch is to be put. In the Examples which follow, enzyme Brabender peak viscosities are reported. These were obtained by a standard method using a Brabender amylograph. 31.5 g (dry basis) starch is dispersed in water to give 450 g of a 7% solids dispersion. The pH is adjusted to 6.5 and 0.1% a-amylase based on starch is added. The slurry is heated te 75OC and held at this temperature for 35 minutes. During this time, the viscosity rises and then falls and the peak value is noted. Enzyme Brabender peak viscosities provide an indication of the susceptibilitv of the starch to -amyaolysis. UHF radiation treated starches according to this invention have greater susceptibility to amylolytic enzyme attack than do the untreated starches. In the Examples which follow, hot water dispersibility is reported. To measure dispersibility, 500 ml water is maintained at 900C and stirred at 133 rpm by means of a semi-submerged vane stirrer. 5 g of the starch under test (sieved to particle size blow 0.5 microns) is released on the surface of the water. After 15 seconds the water is let out through a stop-cock with continuous stirring, and the proportion of starch dispersed is estimated by drying and weighing. Hot water dispersibility of UHF radiation treated starches according to this invention is sometimes, though not always, increased by comparison with the untreated starches, frequently by a factor of 10% or more. Improved hot water dispersibility is of potential value in various applications. Example 1 demonstrates changes in crystallinity of maize starch. Example 2 to 4 and 6 show changes in rheological properties, crystallinity and dispersibility of various starches. Examples 5 and 7 show changes in susceptibility te amylolytic enzyme attack. In all Examples it was determined that the starches treated with UHF radiation had not thereby been significantly gelatinized, and that the temperature had not risen above 100 C during treatment. Example 1 Granular maize starch having various moisture contents is subjected for various times to UHF radiation at a power of 300W and a frequency of 2450 MHz. The results are set out in Table 1. Table 1 Crystallinity of Starch after UHF Treatment EMI10.1 <tb> Treatment <SEP> 12% <SEP> Moisture <SEP> 20% <SEP> Moisture <SEP> 35% <SEP> Moisture <tb> <SEP> Time <SEP> Max <SEP> Crystall- <SEP> Max <SEP> Crystall- <SEP> Max <SEP> Crystall <tb> <SEP> Temp <SEP> inity <SEP> Temp <SEP> inlty <SEP> Temp <SEP> inity <tb> <SEP> (seconds) <SEP> ( C) <SEP> ( C) <SEP> ( C) <tb> <SEP> 0 <SEP> | <SEP> 20 <SEP> 0.5 <SEP> | <SEP> 20 <SEP> 0.45 <SEP> 20 <SEP> 0. <SEP> <tb> <SEP> 20 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 59 <SEP> <SEP> 0.40 <tb> <SEP> @@ <SEP> 0.40 <tb> <SEP> 25 <SEP> | <SEP> 65 <SEP> 0.071 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> 30 <SEP> j <SEP> 74 <SEP> 0.17 <SEP> | <SEP> 70 <SEP> 0.08 <SEP> j <SEP> <SEP> 73 <SEP> 0.03 <tb> <SEP> 35 <SEP> 80 <SEP> 0.15 <SEP> 75 <SEP> 0.06 <SEP> 82 <SEP> 0.03 <tb> <SEP> 40 <SEP> 91 <SEP> 0.09 <SEP> 86 <SEP> 0.06 <SEP> 90 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 45 <SEP> g <SEP> | <SEP> 93 <SEP> 0.04 <SEP> | <SEP> 97 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 50 <SEP> 96 <SEP> 0.07 <SEP> 97 <SEP> 0 <tb> 55 <SEP> , <SEP> <SEP> 98 <SEP> 98 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 60 <SEP> 100 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 99 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 98 <SEP> 0 <tb> Example 2. Preparation of maize starch having low viscosity. A normal granular maize starch adjusted to a water content of 36X by addition of water is distributed at a thickness of 3 cm across a conveyor belt (40 cm wide) and subjected to UHF radiation in a tunnel 5.5 m long at a power of 30 KW and a frequency of 2450 MHz. In this tunnel, the radiation is actually e-Itted or a of only about 2 metres. The radiation is absorbed bv the starch over a length which is greater than 2 metres but is not easily determined. It is here assumed tut the starch is subjected to the radiation over the entire length of the tunnel. The speed of movement of the conveyor belt is adjusted respectively to 2.8 m/n, .1 m/mm. 0.55 m/mm, giving treatment times of 2, 5 and 10 minutes respectively. The thus-treated starch leaves the tunnel at a temperature between 95 and 98 0C. Charac- teristic properties of the starches compared to untreated maize starch are given in the following Table 2. Table 2 EMI11.1 <tb> Treatment <SEP> Brabender <SEP> normal <SEP> l <SEP> Enzymatic <SEP> Crystallinity <tb> time <SEP> Peak <SEP> (P) <SEP> Retro- <SEP> @ <SEP> Brabender <SEP> Peak <tb> (minutes) <SEP> gradation <SEP> (R) <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> P <SEP> 360 <SEP> 700 <SEP> .46 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 700 <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> P <SEP> 280 <SEP> 400 <SEP> .02 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 680 <tb> <SEP> 5 <SEP> P <SEP> - <SEP> 0 <SEP> .02 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 500 <tb> <SEP> 10 <SEP> P <SEP> <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 300 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <tb> Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings is a graph showing viscosity in Brabender units against time and temperature. The peak and retrogradation viscosities reported in Table 2 are taken from the profiles in this figure. It will be noted that UHF treatment reduces both the peak and the retrogradation viscosities, and that this reduction is more marked for longer treatment times. In fact, the samples treated for 5 and 10 minutes show no real peak viscosity in the Brabender profile, and this is indicative that the crystallinity of these starches has been substantially completely destroyed. The Brabender enzymatic peak viscosity figures are obtained by a different but standard technique. Again, the absence of a Brabender enzymatic peak viscosity for starch treated for 5 and 10 minutes indicates that the crystalline regions of these starches have been substantially completely destroyed by the UHF radiation. The swelling temperature of the starch is indicated by the point at which the profile starts to rise steeply from the ordinate. It will be noted that this temperature is not greatly altered by UHF treatment of corn starch. Example 3 Preparation of native maize starch of low viscosity. In the same apparatus and under the same conditions as Example 2, a granular native maize starch was adjusted to the following water contents 28%, 36%, 46Z, and treated by means of UHF radiation of frequency 2450 MHz and power 30KW, using a speed of movement of the conveyor belt of 1.1 m/mn and thus a treatment time of 5 minutes. Characteristic properties of this starch after treatment compared to those of the starting maize starch are given in Table 3 below. Table 3 EMI13.1 <tb> Water <SEP> content <SEP> Brabender <SEP> I <SEP> Enzymatic <SEP> Crystall- <SEP> Hot <SEP> water <tb> <SEP> of <SEP> starch <SEP> normal <SEP> Peak <SEP> Brabender <SEP> inity <SEP> Dispersi <tb> before <SEP> UHF <SEP> (P) <SEP> Retro- <SEP> : <SEP> Peak <SEP> bilitv <SEP> $ <SEP> <tb> <SEP> treatment <SEP> gradation <SEP> (R) <tb> <SEP> Control <SEP> P <SEP> 360 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> R <SEP> 700 <SEP> 700 <SEP> .46 <SEP> 52 <tb> <SEP> 28% <SEP> P <SEP> 300 <tb> <SEP> ; ; <SEP> R <SEP> 700 <SEP> 420 <SEP> .43 <SEP> 54 <tb> <SEP> 36% <SEP> P <SEP> - <SEP> 0 <SEP> .21 <SEP> 61 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 500 <tb> <SEP> 46% <SEP> P <SEP> - <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 59 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 300 <SEP> <SEP> t <SEP> <tb> Example 4 Treatment of native potato starch. Native potato starch adjusted to water contents 19% 26%, 38Z, 41Z under the conditions set out in Examples 2 and 3 is treated with UHF radiation of frequency 2450 MHz and power 30KW, the speed of movement of the conveyor belt being maintained at 1.1 m/mm and the treatment time at 5 minutes. Characteristic properties of this starch after treatment, compared to those of the starting potato starch are set out in the following Table 4. Table 4 EMI14.1 <tb> Water <SEP> content <SEP> Brabender <SEP> Crystallinity <SEP> Hot <SEP> water <tb> of <SEP> the <SEP> potato <SEP> normal <SEP> Peak <SEP> dispersibility <tb> <SEP> starch <SEP> before <SEP> (P) <SEP> Retro- <SEP> <tb> UHF <SEP> treatment <SEP> gradation <SEP> (R) <tb> Control <SEP> | <SEP> P <SEP> 3920 <SEP> .36 <SEP> ! <SEP> <SEP> 40 <tb> R <SEP> 1320 <tb> <SEP> 19% <SEP> 1 <SEP> P <SEP> 3300 <SEP> .11 <SEP> 39 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 1700 <tb> 26% <SEP> P <SEP> 2500 <SEP> .05 <SEP> 40 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> 1980 <tb> 38% <SEP> P <SEP> 2150 <SEP> .01 <SEP> 54 <tb> R <SEP> 2320 <tb> 41% <SEP> P <SEP> 1800 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 57 <tb> 2080 <SEP> I <SEP> <tb> Figure 2 of the accompanying drawings is a graph of viscosity in Brabender units against temperature and time, showing profiles obtained according to Example 4, and from which the figures in table 4 above have been obtained. Potato starch differs from corn starch in that the pe2k Brabender viscosity is greater than the retrogradation viscosity; as shown in the figure, UHF radiation treatment reduces the peak viscosity (this is a characteristic feature of UHF treatment), but retrogradation viscosity is somewhat increased. UHF radiation treatment also increases the swelling temperature of the starch, a feature which may be valuable in certain applications. Example 5 Treatment of native maize starch in the granular state, intended for the preparation of a hydrolysate rich in maltose. A native granular maize starch was adjusted to 35% water content and separated into 3 portions. The first portion served as control. The second portion was treated under the conditions of Example 2 with UF radiation of frequency 2450 MHz and power 30 KW. The speed of movement of the conveyor belt was maintained at 1.1 mlmr. giving a treatment time of 5 minutes. The third portion was subjected to this UHF radiation treatment twice, giving a total treatment time of 10 minutes. The portions of starch thus treated, without being dried, were dispersed in water so as to prepare suspensions containing 32% of material on a dry weight basis. These three suspensions were hydrolyzed simultaneously first by a commercially available &alpha;-amylase (60000 u/g, 0.125% on dry starch) at pH 6.2 and 95 C, then by a commercially available ss-amylase (70 u/g, 30 units per 1000 g of dry starch) at pH 4.8 and 55 C. The syrups resulting from these hydrolyses after 10 hours are set out in the following table 5. Table 5 Composition of Starch Hydrolysates (Wt %) EMI15.1 <tb> Sugar <SEP> Untreated <SEP> Single <SEP> treatment <SEP> Double <SEP> treatment <tb> <SEP> native <SEP> by <SEP> UHF <SEP> Radia- <SEP> by <SEP> UHF <SEP> Radiation <tb> <SEP> maize <SEP> tion <tb> <SEP> starch <tb> Dextrose <SEP> 0.9 <SEP> 0.9 <SEP> 0.7 <tb> Maltose <SEP> 42.0 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 46.8 <SEP> 1 <SEP> 52.4 <tb> <SEP> Maltotriose <SEP> 25.9 <SEP> 20.0 <SEP> 18.4 <tb> <SEP> DP <SEP> 4 <SEP> 5.5 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> DP <SEP> 5 <SEP> <SEP> 25.7 <SEP> 32.2 <SEP> , <SEP> <SEP> 28.4 <tb> DE <SEP> 41.1 <SEP> 40.7 <SEP> 42.9 <tb> In the above table, DP4 refers to sugars having a degree of polymerization of four, DP5+ refers to oligos accharides having a degree of polymerization of five or more, and DE stands for Dextrose Equivalent. The main difference between hydrolysates is the proportion of maltose, which is greater in the hydrolysate from starch subjected once or twice to UHF radiation according to this invention. This suggests that the UHF radiatIon has broken the chain branching a 1 - 6 linkages, thus reducing the proportions of the starch chains not avail- able for hydrolysis by B-amylase. Example 6 UHF treatment of various starches. Various native starches were subjected as a 3 cm deep layer under different conditions to UHF radiation in a tunnel 5.5m long and at a power of 30KW and a frequency of 2450 MHz. The nature of the starch, the conditions of treatment and properties of the resulting products are set out in table 6 below. Table 6 Brabender Viscosities of Various Starches after UHF Treatment EMI17.1 <tb> Kind <SEP> of <SEP> Moisture <SEP> Treatment <SEP> Brabender <SEP> ViscosityCrysta- <SEP> Hot <tb> starch <SEP> content <SEP> time <SEP> llinity <SEP> dispersed; <SEP> <tb> <SEP> (%) <SEP> (minutes) <SEP> bility <tb> <SEP> Peak <SEP> Retro <tb> <SEP> tion <tb> Potato <SEP> 36 <SEP> Control <SEP> 3900 <SEP> 1350 <SEP> .36 <tb> <SEP> 36 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 3300 <SEP> ! <SEP> <SEP> 1750 <SEP> .02 <tb> <SEP> 36 <SEP> , <SEP> <SEP> 7.5 <SEP> 3100 <SEP> 1800 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 36 <SEP> 10 <SEP> 1900 <SEP> 900 <SEP> 0 <tb> Waxy <tb> corn <SEP> Control <SEP> 1200 <SEP> 550 <SEP> .30 <SEP> 23 <tb> <SEP> 34 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 1050 <SEP> 500 <SEP> .03 <SEP> 24 <tb> <SEP> 40 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 850 <SEP> 450 <SEP> .05 <SEP> 29 <tb> <SEP> 1 <SEP> 49 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 300 <SEP> ; <SEP> <SEP> 250 <SEP> 0 <SEP> <SEP> @ <SEP> 44 <tb> Tapi- <SEP> Control <SEP> 900 <SEP> 580 <SEP> .45 <SEP> 29 <tb> oca <SEP> 19 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 800 <SEP> 600 <SEP> .11 <SEP> 27 <tb> <SEP> 33 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 450 <SEP> 630 <SEP> .08 <SEP> 28 <tb> <SEP> 40 <SEP> 5 <SEP> 380 <SEP> | <SEP> 620 <SEP> .02 <SEP> 29 <tb> Example 7 Beta amylolysis of raw starch. Regular maize starch was divided into two portions. One portion was treated at 35% moisture content for 45 seconds with UHF radiation of frequency 2450 MHz at 600 W. l.9g of each portion was dispersed in 70 ml water and there was added 80 ml of buffer (pH 5.2) and 30 ml of a dispersion of beta amylase at 10 mg/ml. The dispersion was maintained at 30 C, and the maltose content was determined at intervals, with the results shown in Table 7. The ss-amylase used was a pure product derived from barley and having an activity of 10 u/mg. (lumeans that l.Omg of maltose is produced from starch in 3 minutes at 200C and pH 4.8). Table 7 EMI18.1 <tb> <SEP> Beta-amylolysis <SEP> | <SEP> t <SEP> % <SEP> Maltose <SEP> released <SEP> <tb> <SEP> time <SEP> (hrs) <SEP> Regular <SEP> Starch <SEP> UHF <SEP> Radiation <SEP> Treated <tb> <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 11.9 <tb> 4 <SEP> 2.9 <SEP> 20.4 <tb> <SEP> 23 <SEP> 5.2 <SEP> 37.5 <tb> <SEP> 47 <SEP> | <SEP> 12.1 <SEP> 48.9 <tb> <SEP> 69 <SEP> 22.0 <SEP> 55.0 <tb> <SEP> 140 <SEP> 37.4 <SEP> 62.3 <tb> <SEP> 210 <SEP> 44.0 <SEP> 66.5 <tb> <SEP> 280 <SEP> 47.5 <SEP> 68.0 <tb> <SEP> 350 <SEP> 48.0 <SEP> 68.0 <tb> These results show clearly the effect of UHF radiation treatment on speed and extent of beta-amylolysis.

Claims: CLAIZ :S 1. A method of modifying starch, which method comprises subjecting a starting mixture of starch and water, containing from 4% to 607 by weight of water on the ccrSined weight of starch and water, to UHF radiation under conditions chosen so that the starch reaches a maximum temperature of no greater than 1000C and is-not significantly gelatinized, and recovering a. starch having a crystallinity not more than half that of the untreated starch. 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the starting mixture contains from 25% to 50% by weight of water on the combined weight of starch and water. 3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the UHF radiation has a frequency of 2450 MHz. 4, A method as claimed in any on of claims 1 to 3, wherein the time of treatment is from 20 seconds to 15 minutes. 5. Starch modified by treatment with UHF radiation said starch being not significantly gelatinized and having a crystallinity not more than half that of the untreated starch. 6. Starch as claimed in claim 5 having either no peak Brabender viscosity or a peak Brabender viscosity not more than half that of the untreated starch. 7. Starch as claimed in claim 5 or claim 6 having a dispersibility in water at 900C at least 10X greater than that of the untreated starch. 8. Starch as claimed in any one of claims 5 to 7 having a susceptibility to amylolytic enzyme attack greater than that of the untreated starch. 9. A method as claimed in any one of claims I to 4, wherein the treated starch is formed into an aqueous slurry and subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis. 10. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the treated starch is subjected to the action of a-amylase and B-amylase.

Inventors: GONZE, MICHEL, LANE, CHRISTOPHER, MARQUETTE, GEORGES HENRI ALBERT LAB. RECHERCHE
Applicants: CPC INTERNATIONAL INC.
Application year: 1982
Main classification: C08B30
IPC codes: C13K1, C08B30