COMPOSITE SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANE, PROCESS FOR ITS PRODUCTION, AND METHOD OF ITS USE

Abstract: A composite semipermeable membrane having excel­ lent oxidation resistance, which comprises a microporous membrane having provided thereon a crosslinked high molecular thin film formed by the reaction between an aliphatic diamine and an aromatic tricarboxylic acid halide and mainly composed of, for example, a structural unit represented by the following formula: process for its production; and method of its use.

Description: SPECIFICATION Title of the Invention Composite Semipermeable Membrane, Process for the Preparation Thereof, and Method of Its use. Technical Field The present invention relates to a composite semipermeable membrane and, more specifically relates to a composite semipermeable membrane having an excellent semipermeability and outstanding resistance to oxidation. Background Art In the early days of its development, a reverse osmosis membrane of cellulose acetate type developed by Loeb and Sourirajan et al. was widely used because of its excellent basic performance and easiness of preparation. However, it offered problems raised by its week points including hydrolizability in acidic and alkaline solutions, degenerative decomposition due to the growth of microbes, excessive density under high pressure, and unfitness for dry storage and ameliorated varieties of reverse osmosis membranes made from synthetic high polymer materials were proposed to correct these defects. Du Pont proposed a reverse osmosis membrane made from wholly aromatic polyamide. This membrane was much improved in terms of hydrolizability and degenerative microbial decomposition; however, it never exceeded a cellulose acetate membrane in basic performance and it still maintained such week points as excessive density under high pressure and unfitness for dry storage. The preceding membranes are both what is called a membrane of heterogenous system prepared after a method called phase separation, wherein the membrane is composed of a homogenous layer which functions as a separator and a porous layer which reinforces the membrane, both being made from the same material. On the other hand, a method was proposed to prepare a reverse osmosis membrane, wherein a crosslinked thin filmy separation layer was formed by allowing a reactive hydrophilic polymer to react with a cross linking agent upon the porous layer prepared beforehand from a different material. This membrane proved to have been greatly improved in hydrolizability, degenerative microbial decomposition, increase of density under high pressure, and dry storability in addition to improved basic performance. The North Star Research Institute proved that the use of polyethyleneimine as reactive hydrophilic polymer and the use of such poliacid chloride as isophthalic acid chloride or such polyisocianate as toluylenediisocianate made it possible to achieve the aforementioned improvements. At the same time, however, it was made clear that the membrane thus obtained encountered a major problem in forming a spiral module because of the weakness of the crosslinked layer due to the excess content of amine in polyethyleneimine used as material. Meanwhile, Universal Oil Products Corp. succeeded in correcting the aforementioned defects by use of amine modified polyepichlorohydrin as reactive hydrophilic polymer; however, it has recently been made known publicly that it is difficult to make a membrane having high water permeability due to the difficulty in preparing its material epiamine and that it has a problem in securing a prolonged durability. Filmtech Inc. (inventor : John E. Caddotte) has recently proposed a composite membrane prepared by cross-linking such a low polymer aromatic amine as methaphenilenediamine, paraphenilenediamine, etc. with such an aromatic polyacid halide as trimesic acid chloride on a microporous film (see Japanese Patent Application Laying-Open No. 147106/80) with a disclosure that it has an excellent desalting performance and outstanding resistance to oxidation. However, the investigation conducted into this composite membrane by the inventors of the present invention made it clear that the resistance to oxidation of this membrane was kept up only for a short duration since the membrane started to show typical phenomena of deterioration of the membrane such as degradation of desalting performance and increase of permeability of water when only 150 hours passed in the continuous reverse osmosis test conducted in the presence of 4 to 5 ppm activated chlorine as described in a comparison example of the present invention. Earlier than the disclosure of the abovementioned invention, a proposal was made with relation to a composite membrane of high resistance to oxidation obtained by cross-linking polyamine having a secondary amino group only with an aromatic polyacid halide (see Japanese Patent Application Laying-Open No. 139802/80); however, this membrane generally had a defects of having insufficient removability in percentages of both salt and sucrose. More particularly, its removability of salt was 90 to 95% at the most even in the separation of a solute of large molecule as magnesium chloride and the removability of sucrose hardly exceeded 95%. Disclosure of the Invention As a result of a concentrated study made in an effort to correct the abovementioned defects found with the membranes proposed heretofore, the inventors of the present invention have come to find, contrary to the past knowledge, that a semipermeable membrane of high performance having a more excellent resistance to oxidation and higher desalting function as compared with conventionally known semipermeable membranes, especially a membrane invented by Caddotte et al. mentioned in the above, can be prepared from polyamide having an aliphatic primary amido bond, which has been said to make a membrane having insufficient resistance to oxidation, when a proper selection of an acid component is exercised, thus completing the present invention. The present invention is concerned with a composite semipermeable membrane comprising a microporous membrane and a cross-linked high polymer membrane formed thereon containing structural units expressed by the following formula (I) at a mole ratio of 50% at the least EMI4.1 wherein R1 indicates an alkyl group, which may contain a hydroxyl group, having 1 to 3 carbon atoms, or a hydrogen atom; R2 indicates an aliphatic hydrocarbon residue, which may contain an oxygen atom, having 2 to 15 carbon atoms; Ar indicates a condensed or noncondensed aromatic hydrocarbon residue; X indicates a carbonyl bond EMI4.2 or a sulfonyl bond (- SO2-); Y at least partly indicates a direct bond where cross-linkage takes place and the rest indicates - OM or EMI4.3 where M indicates a hydrogen atom, alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, or ammonium group, and a definition of R3 is the same as that of R1, at least one R3 being a hydrogen atom: and a process for the preparation of a composite semipermeable membrane which comprises reacting a diamine compound which contains a compound expressed by the following formula (III) at a mole ratio of 50% at the least R1NH- R2 - NH2 ----- (III) wherein definitions of R1 and R2 are the same as those given in the foregoing definitions; with a cross-linking agent mainly consisting of a compound expressed by the following formula (IV) on a microporous membrane EMI5.1 wherein Z's are the same or different from each other, indicating a halogen atom; X is a carbonyl bond EMI5.2 or a sulfonyl bond (- S02 -): and further a method of employing the abovementioned composite semipermeable membrane repeatedly in the reverse osmosis operations, comprising a bactericidal treatment by use of an aqueous solution of pH 4 to pH 7 containing 0.5 to 5,000 ppm bactericide of chlorine type followed by washing with an aqueous solution containing 10 to 5,000 ppm reducing agent. The compsite semipermeable membrane proposed by the present invention comprises a microporous membrane, an explanation of which is made later, and a cross-linked high polymer membrane formed thereon having structural units expressed by the aforementioned formula (I), in which R1 is an alkyl group, which may contain a hydroxyl group, having 1 to 3 carbon atom, or a hydrogen atom. More concretely, R1 is a hydrogen atom, -CH3, -C2H5, -C3H7, -C2H4OH, or -CH2.CH(OH).CH., preferably a hydrogen atom, -CH3, -C2H5, or -C3H7 of which a hydrogen atom is especially preferable. R2 is an aliphatic hydrocarbon residue, which may contain an oxygen atom, having 2 to 15, preferably 2 to 14 carbon atoms and what is mentioned here as aliphatic may be straight-chain or branched aliphatic or cyclic aliphatic. As R2, -CH2CH2-, -CH2*CH2sCH2-, (CH2)n (n=4-11), EMI6.1 mentioned and, of these, -CH2'CH2-, -CH2-CH2CH2-, EMI6.2 preferable. Ar is a condensed or noncondensed aromatic hydrocarbon residue, preferably having 6 to 13 EMI6.3 EMI6.4 is especially preferable. X is a carbonyl bond or a sulfonyl bond, of which carbonyl bond is preferable. Y must be at least partially a direct bond where cross-linkage takes place and the rest may represent EMI6.5 Here, M is a hydrogen atom, alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, or ammonium group, of which a hydrogen atom and alkali metal are preferable. R3 may be the same as R1; however, at least one of the R31s is a hydrogen atom. It is desirable that 30 to 90%, more desirably 50 to 70% of Y are direct bonds participating in the crosslinkage, and, if possible, it is most desirable that Y are wholly participated in the cross-linkage. The aforementioned cross-linked high polymer membrane must necessarily contain structural units, which are expressed by formula (I) and composed of the abovementioned constituents, at a mole ratio of 50% at the least and it is more desirable for the membrane to contain at a mole ratio of 60% or more. As for the structural units other than said structural units expressed by formula (I), no specific restrictions may be placed on their use so far as they do not interfere with the effectiveness of the present invention; however, in case where a small amount of structural units originating in an aliphatic diamine containing a secondary amine is contained, water permeability of the obtained membrane can be improved without damaging both the excellent resistance to oxidation and outstanding desalting performance which are the primary effectiveness of the present invention. As the structural units of such type, those structural units expressed by the following formula (II) may be mentioned: EMI7.1 wherein R4 and R5 are alkyl groups, each of which may independently contain a hydroxyl group, having 1 to 3 carbon atoms, or otherwise R4 and R5 are linked to one another or respectively to R6 to form a piperazyl group or dipiperidylalkylen group, which may be substituted by a methyl group and/or an ethyl group, together with two nitrogen atoms and R6 to which they are linked; R6 indi cates an aliphatic hydrocarbon residue, which may contain an oxygen atom, having 2 to 15 carbon atoms. The definitions of Ar, X and Y are the same as the aforementioned ones. In the abovementioned formula, R4 and R5 can be alkyl groups, which may have a hydroxyl group, having 1 to 3 carbon atoms and as their concrete examples, those referred to in the case of the aforementioned R1 may again be cited, including -CH3, -C2Hs, -C2H4-OH, and -C3H7 as desirable ones, of which -C2H5 is especially desirable. R4 and R5 are linked to one another or respectively to R6 to form a piperazyl group or dipiperadylalkylen group, which may be substituted by a methyl group and/or an ethyl group, together with two nitrogen atoms and R6 to which they are linked, desirably to form a piperazyl group not substituted by a methyl group and/or an ethyl group. Ar, X, and Y are defined the same as the above. The structural units expressed by the aforementioned formula (II) are contained at a mole ratio of less than 40% and in some desirable modes the content is in the range of mole ratio of 5% to 30%. The cross-linked high polymer membrane may be allowed to contain structural units originating from an aromatic diamine, or more particularly structural units expressed by the following formula (VI) at a mole ratio of less than 30%: EMI9.1 wherein R7 and R8, being the same or different from each other, are a hydrogen atom or a methyl group; Q is a noncondensed aromatic hydrocarbon residue, which may be substituted by -COOM and/or -SO3M and also may contain an ether bond, having 6 to 15 carbon atoms; and definitions of Ar, X, Y are the same as those mentioned in the foregoing. EMI9.2 Also the cross-linked high polymer menbrane of the present invention may contain structural units expressed by the following formula (VII) at a mole ratio of less than 40%, more preferably less than 30%. EMI9.3 wherein Rs and Rio are the same or different from each other and indicate an alkyl group, which may contain a hydrogen atom or a hydroxyl group, having 1 to 3 carbon atoms, or otherwise Rg and Rio are linked to one another or respectively to R11 to form a piperazyl group or dipiperidylalkylen group, which may be substituted by a methyl group or an ethyl group, together with two nitrogen atoms and R11 to which they are linked; ; R11 indicates an aliphatic hydro carbon residue, which may contain an exygen atom, having 2 to 15 carbon atoms, or a non condensed aromatic hydrocarbon residue, which may be substituted by -COOM and/or -SO3M and also may contain an ether bond, having 6 to 15 carbon atoms, where M indicates a hydrogen atom, alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, or ammonium group; and Ar' indicates a noncon densed or condensed aromatic hydrocarbon residue, which may contain an ether bond or sulfonyl bond, having 6 to 15 carbon atoms. The cross-linked high polymer membrane can be additionally covered with a protective coating. As protective coatings, coatings of such water-soluble polymers as polyvinyl pyrrolidone and polyvinyl methyl ether, or of such water-insoluble polyvinyl alcohol, or of porous aliphatic polyamide may be mentioned. Of these coatings, water-insoluble polyvinyl alcohol coatings and porous aliphatic polyamide coatings are preferable. As water-insoluble polyvinyl alcohol coatings, those obtained by thermally gelating polyvinyl alcohol and those obtained by cross-linking polyvinyl alcohol with glutaraldehyde, folmalin, glyoxal, or a sulfurous acid adduct thereof may be mentioned. As porous aliphatic polyamide coatings, porous coatings of such aliphatic polyamides as poly-E-caproamide and polyhexamethyl adipamide may be mentioned. As the microporous membrane which functions as a supporting substratum in the present invention, vitreous porous materials, sintered metals, ceramic materials, and such organic polymers as cellulose ester, polystyrene, vinylbutyral, polysulfone, vinyl chloride, etc. may be mentioned. A polysulfone membrane displays especially outstanding functions when used as a microporous membrane in the present invention and polyvinyl chloride also makes a useful membrane. A process for the preparation of a polysulfone microporous membrane is also described in the Report No. 359 published by the OSW, U.S.A. The desirable size of pores on the surface of such a membrane is in the range of about 100 A to 1000 ; however, the range of sizes is not limited to these values. The size of pores on the surface of a o o membrane can be anywhere between 50 A and 5000 A depending upon the final use of a composite membrane. These microporous membranes can be used in disregard of its being of symmetry structure or asymmetry structure; however, membranes of asymmetry structure are desirably used. In case where the membrane constant of these microporous membrane is 10-4 g/cm2. secatm or less, the water permeability becomes too low and in case where the membrane constant is lg/cm2. secatm or more, the desalting percentage is liable to decrease, both being undesirable. Accordingly, the membrane constant in the range of 1 to 10-4 g/cm2. secatm give a desirable result and the membrane constant in the range of 10-1 to 10-3 g/cm2.sec.atm give the most desirable result. The membrane constant referred to in the above is defined to express the value of pure water permeability under pressure of 2 kg/cm2 and expressed in a unit of g/cm2.sec.atm. It is desirable that these microporous membranes are used in a state of being reinforced with the use of a woven fabric or a nonwoven fabric on their reverse side. As such woven or nonwoven fabrics, fabrics made from polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene, polypropylene, nylon or vinyl chloride may be mentioned as ideal examples. The composite semipermeable membrane of the present invention comprises a microporous membrane having a thickness of about 40 pm to 5 mm, especially in case of a microporous membrane of organic polymer, the thickness is in the range of 40 pm to 70 pm, and the aforementioned cross-linked high polymer membrane having a thickness of 200 2 to 1500 formed thereon, with a protective coating having a thickness of 0.1 pm to 1 pm formed thereon furthermore, if necessary. The composite membrane of the present invention is obtained by cross-linking a diamine compound which contains an aliphatic diamine expressed by the following formula (III) at a mole ratio of 50% at the least, more preferably 60% or more R1NH - R2 - NH2 ----- (III) wherein definitions of R1 and R2 are the same as the aforementioned definitions; with a cross-linking agent, which mainly comprises an aromatic yslyacid halide expressed by the following formula (IV), on the microporous membrane EMI12.1 wherein a definition of Ar is the same as the aforementioned one; Z's are the same or diferent from one another, indicating a halogen atom; X indicates a sufonyl bond or a carbonyl group. As the aliphatic diamines expressed by the abovementioned formula (III) to be used in this invention, those which are soluble in a solvent, preferably in water or lower alcohol, are used. The following diamines may be listed as examples: H2NCH2CH2NH2 , H2NCH2CH2CH2NH2 H2N (CH2) 4NH2 , H2N (CH2) 5NH2 H2N (CH2) 6NH2 , H2N (CH2) 7NH2 H2N (CH2) 8NH2 , H2N (CH2) 9NH2 H2N (CH2) 10NH2 , H2N (CH2) 11NH2 (CH2) NHCH2CH2NH2 , (C2H5) NHCH2CH2NH2 HOCH2CH2NHCH2CH2NH2 , CH3CHCH2NHCH2CH2NH2 OH H2NCH2CH20CH2CH2NH2 H2NCH2CH2CH2OCH2CH2CH2NH2 EMI13.1 Of these aliphatic diamines mentioned above, ethylenediamine and cyclohexanediamine are especially disirable. The abovementioned aliphatic diamines can be used singly or in combination of more than one. The use of the abovementioned diamine in combination with other polyamine compound is also included in the scope of the present invention. The following polyamines can be used as suitable ones. (1) Straight-chain aliphatic secondary diamines: CH3NHCH2CH2NHCH3 C2H5NHCH2CH2NHC2H5 HOCH2CH2NHCH2CH2NHCH2CH20H (2) Cyclic aliphatic secondary diamines: Piperazine EMI14.1 2-methylpiperazine EMI14.2 2-ethylpiperazine EMI14.3 2,5-dimethylpiperazine EMI14.4 dipiperidylpropane EMI14.5 The combined use of these polyamines can properly adjust and improve the water permeability and/or desalting performance of the composite membrane of the present invention. Also, the following aromatic diamines can be used to the extent of not damaging the effectiveness of the present invention, for instance, at a mole ratio not exceeding 30%, though the use is not especially desirable. (3) Aromatic diamines: Methaphenilenediamine EMI14.6 paraphenilenediamine EMI15.1 4, 4-diaminodiphenylamine EMI15.2 4,4 '-diaminodiphenyl ether EMI15.3 3,4'-diaminodiphenyl ether EMI15.4 3,3'-diaminodiphenylamine EMI15.5 3,5-diaminobenzoate EMI15.6 incicates carboxylate.) In case where these diamines are used, aliphatic secondary diamines should be used at a mole ratio of 50% or less, desirably 40% or less, most desirably 30% or less of the whole diamine components, and aromatic diamines should be 30% or less. In obtaining the composite membrane of the present invention by use of the aforementioned diamine compounds, it is necessary to apply a solution of any of these amine compounds on the suface of said microporous membrane. Any methods of application including a dip coating method, roller coating method, wick coating method, spray coating method, etc. may be adopted in applying an amine solution; however, the coating conditions must be controlled to keep the thickness of the applied coating of amine compound in the range of 0.01 to 2 pm, preferably 0.02 to 1 pm, more preferably 0.05 to 0.7 pin, When the thickness of a coating of amine compound is less than the abovementioned lower limit (0.01 pin), the active layer of the finally obtained composite membrane will be too thin to keep up enough mechanical strength for practical use. When the coating is made thicker than 2 wm, the active layer becomes too thick, developing a tendency to degrade the water permeability of the composite membrane. These diamines must be soluble and it is desirable that they are especially soluble in water, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, methyl cellosolve, dioxane, or tetrahydrbfuran, or a mixed solvent consisting of more than one of these solvents at a ratio of 0.1 g / 100 m or more, preferably 0.5 g / 100 mL or more. Especially it is desirable to use diamines having a solubility of 0.1 g / 100 m or more, more desirably 0.5 g / 100 m or more, in water. A diamine compound solution of the present invention which is prepared by dissolving more than 0.1% of at least one kind of solvent (water is especially desirable) selected from a group of the abovementioned solvents is coated on or impregnated into the aforementioned microporous membrane of high microporosity. The microporous membrane, which is applied with the aforementioned diamine, is subjected to a crosslinking treatment with the use of an aromatic halide expressed by the aforementioned formula (IV) containing a functional group, which is capable of forming a carbonamide bond or a sulfonamide bond by reacting with said amino group, whereby the aforementioned diamine is transformed into a cross-linked membrane on the microporous membrane. The functional group contained in the multifunctional compound, which is used as a cross-linking agent in this invention, is either a carbonyl halide group (-COZ) or a sulfonyl halide group (-SO2Z) containing 3 of these functional groups in a molecule. Especially useful functional groups are an acid chloride group and a sulfonyl chloride group. These functional groups contained plurally in a molecule may be similar to or different from one another in kind. As for the multifunctional compound, aromatic multifunctional compounds are useful. The following may be mentioned as concrete examples of these crosslinking agents. EMI17.1 The abovementioned aromatic multifunctional compounds may be used singly or in combination of more than one. According to the present invention, it has been made clear that, in some instances, the combined use of the abovementioned trifunctional compound and the bifunctional compound expressed by the following formula (VI) in stead of the single use of said trifunctional compound facilitates the control of the desalting percentage and/or water permeability of a finally obtained membrane ZOC - Ar - ZOC ¯¯¯¯¯ (VI) wherein a definition of Z is the same as the definition given in the aforementioned formula (IV). As such bifunctional compounds, the following may be mentioned as examples: EMI18.1 In cases where these bifunctional compounds are used, their use should be at a mole ratio of 1 to 50%, desirably 5 to 30%, of said trifunctional compounds. The composite membrane of the present invention can be obtained by bringing the aforementioned diamine into direct contact with a solution of the abovementioned multifunctional compound on the microporous membrane. Solvents to be used in dissolving multifunctional compounds should be those which do not substantially dissolve said polyamine compounds and base materials and such solvents of hydrocarbon type as n-hexane, n-heptane, n-octane, cyclohexane, nnonane, n-decane, etc. and such hydrocarbons of halogen type as carbon tetrachloride, difluorotetrachloroethane, trifluorotrichloroethane, hexachloroethane, etc., for instance, may be mentioned. The appropriate concentration of a multifunctional compound dissolved in the solvent may be varied depending upon the kind of the multifunctional compound, solvent, base material, and other conditions and the optimum value of concentration can be determined experimentally. However, in general, the desired effect can be obtained at the concentration of about 0.1 to 5.0% by weight, preferably 0.5 to 3.0% by weight. The cross linking of a polyamine compound by use of a multifunctional compound can be appropriately achieved by causing the interface reaction in the hetero-phase between the membrane and the solution, which reaction can be induced by impregnating the polyamine compound coated membrane with a solution of multifunctional compound. At this time, an interface reaction promoter can be contained beforehand in the aforementioned diamine compound or a solution of the abovementioned multifunctional compound in order to promote the interface cross linking reaction. Caustic alkali, sodium phosphate, pyridine, tertiary amine, surface active agent, sodium acetate, and the like can be used as useful promoters. Said interface cross linking reaction of the diamine compound with the multifunctional compound can be carried out at room temperature and about 100 C, desirably at temperature between 20 and 500C, for 2 seconds to 10 minutes, desirably for 10 seconds to 5 minutes. This interface cross linking reaction can be conducted in such a way as to be mainly focused on the surface of the membrane. After an excess solution of multifunctional compound is drained for 10 seconds to 2 minutes as case may require, the membrane supported by the base material is cured at room temperature or, if necessary, is subjected to heat treatment at 40 to 130 C, desirably at 50 to 800C for about 1 to 30 minutes, desirably for about 5 to 20 minutes, thus completing said interface cross-linking reaction and also achieving the water insolubility of the aforementioned diamine compound. In this way, the desired composite membrane having a thin cross-linked polycondensate coating of selective permeability formed on the surface of a microporous membrane is obtained. A description is given in the above as to a method of first coating the microporous membrane with a diamine compound; however, there is another method of first coating the microporous membrane with a cross-linking agent and then allowing the agent to react with the diamine compound. Examples of the cross-linked polyamides which are able to form an active layer of the composite membrane of the present invention thus obtained are given below. EMI21.1 EMI21.2 EMI22.1 Thus obtained composite membrane of the present invention is endowed with extraordinary resistance to oxidation in addition to its outstanding basic reverse osmotic performance, resistance to blocking under pressure, heat resistance, PH resistance, etc. and it may be said that it has the marked usefulness and characteristics that are not found with other conventional known membranes. Furthermore in the present invention, a watersoluble or water-insoluble protective coating can be formed on the cross-linked high polymer membrane of the composite semipermeable membrane obtained in the above. To illustrate such protective coatings by example, coatings of such compounds as polyvinyl pyrrolidone and polyvinyl methyl ether may be mentioned as watersoluble protective coatings, while a water-isolubilized coating of polyvinyl alcohol and a porous coating of aliphatic polyamide may be mentioned as water-insoluble protective coatings. Protective coatings of polyvinyl pyrrolidone and polyvinyl methyl ether can be obtained by dissolving said polymer in such a solvent as water, lower alcohol, or a mixture thereof, coating and drying thus prepared solution on the cross-linked high polymer membrane. A water-insolubilized coating of polyvinyl alcohol can be obtained by dissolving polyvinyl alsohol in water together with formalin, glyoxal, glutaraldehyde, and one or more compounds selected from the sulfites thereof, or together with ammonium persulfate and/or potassiun persulfate, coating the surface of the cross-linked high polymer membrane with thus prepared solution, and subjecting the coating to heat-treatment at 50 to 1200C, desirably at 70 to 1000C, for 5 to 30 minutes to have the coating acetal cross-linked or self-gelated. A porous coating of aliphatic polyamide can be obtained by forming a polyamide coating on the crosslinked high polymer membrane by application of a solution prepared by dissolving aliphatic polyamide in a methanol solution containing such a poring agent as calcium chloride, for instance, followed by a treatment with water wherein the poring agent is extracted to make the coating porous Thus obtained composite semipermeable membrane can be used in various separation works by use of the membrane based on the physical laws of diffusion and osmosis. In ordinary separation works, the membrane is washed with a bactericide after it is used for a specified period and bactericides of chlorine type are used very often. When treated with a bactericide of highly concentrated chlorine solution, conventional membranes become deteriorated, while the composite membrane of this invention remains good for continued use because of its strong resistance to oxidation. Furthermore, in the present invention said treatment of the membrane with e bactericide of chlorine type may be followed usefully by the treatment of the membrane with a solution of reducing agent to release the adsorbed chlorine, thus recovering its performance afresh. As the methods of bactericiding the membrane, there is a method in which the membrane is made to contact an aqueous solution in the pH range between 4 to 7 containing 0.5 ppm X 5,000 ppm bactericide such as sodium hypochlorite, hypochlorous acid, hypobromous acid, hydrogen peroxide, sodium perborate, iodophor and sodium dichloroisocyanurate, at 10 to 500C for 10 to 100 minutes. As the methods of treating the membrane with a reducing agent which follow the bactericiding carried out by use of bactericides of chlorine type among the abovementioned bactericides, there is a method in which the bactericided membrane is made to contact an aqueous solution containing 10 ppm ¯ 5,000 ppm reducing agent such as sodium thiosulfate, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, and sodium bisulfite, at 10 to 500C for 10 to 100 minutes. The abovementioned methods of regenerating the membrane are especially useful in the fields where solutions, which are apt to cause the propagation of bacteria, like aqueous solutions containing, for instance, saccharides, amino acids, alcohols, organic carboxylic acids, etc. are separated by use of the membrane. The present invention will now be described more specifically with reference to examples given below. Reverse osmosis test: The test was conducted at 250C under pressure of 42.5 kg/cm2G with an ordinary continuous pump circulation reverse osmosis equipment by using an aqueous solution in the pH range of 6.0 to 6.5 always containing 5,000 ppm sodium chloride and 4 to 5 ppm hypo-.. chlorous acid. Accelerated chlorine resistance evaluation method In addition to the abovementioned reverse osmotic testing, an accelerated chlorine resistance evaluation test was conducted likewise by raising the concentration of hypochlorous acid to 1,000 ppm. The performance of the membrane in the test was shown by the data obtained from the membrane after it was further subjected to the reducing agent treatment. Desalting percentage: The desalting percentage described in the examples is a value obtained by the following equation: EMI26.1 Reference Example 1 Preparation of polysulfone porous supporting membrane A piece of Dacron non-woven fabric of a dense texture (unit weight : 180 g/m2) was fixed on a glass plate. A solution containing 12.5 wt % polysulfone, 12.5 wt % methyl cellosolve, and dimethylformamide making up the rest was cast to form a layer of about 0.2 mm thickness on said non-woven fabric and the layer was immediately gelated in a water bath at room temperature to obtain a porous polysulfone membrane reinforced with a non-woven fabric. In the electrone microphotograph, the porous polysulfone layer thus formed was about 40 to 70 pm thick, exhibited an asymmetry structure, and showed a large number of micropores about 200 to 700 A on the surface. These porous base materials had a permeability to pure water (membrane constant) in the range of about 3.0 to 7.0 x 10-2 g/cm2.sec.atm at 2 kg/cm2G. Example 1 The porous polysulfone membrane obtained in Reference Example 2 was immersed in an aqueous solution prepared by dissolving 1 g of ethylenediamine (immediately after distillation) in 100 m± of distilled water for 5 minutes, taken out of the aqueous solution, and drained at room temperature for 7 minutes while being hung vertically. After thus drained membrane was immersed in trimesic acid chloride containing 0.5 wt % n-hexane for 20 seconds, the membrane was air-dried at room temperature for 30 minutes. When thus obtained composite membrane was subjected to the reverse osmosis test under the conditions described in Reference Example 1, the membrane showed initial performance values, desalting percentage of 98.9% and water permeability of 41.3 ±/m2.hr. The membrane was further put to the reverse osmosis test under the same conditions (with the osmosis solution constantly adjusted to pH 6.0 to 6.5 and 4 to 5 ppm hypochlorous acid content during the test), and the desalting percentage and water permeability obtained 200 hours, 500 hours, and 1,000 hours after the test was resumed were 99.1% and 37.5 /m2.hr, 99.3% and 31.4 /m2.hr, and 99.3% and 28.6 /m2.hr respectively. The result showed that the membrane maintained a very stabilized desalting performance though its water permeability decreased slightly. After the composite membrane of Example 1 prepared under the abovementioned conditions was immersed in an aqueous solution of 0.1% NaOH for 24 hours, the membrane was washed several times with distilled water and dried under vacuum. The membrane was then immersed in chloroform and the cross-linked active layer polymer, which could be isolated by eluting the polysulfone microporous membrane, was thoroughly washed with chloroform, followed by washing with alcohol and also with water. When the powder polymer obtained by refining and drying said polymer was subjected to the Na atom absorptiometric analysis, Na of 0.53 milliequivalent/g based on the conversion to sodium carboxylate groups (-COONa) was detected. The composition of the abovementioned polymer estimated from the value thus obtained is as follows: EMI28.1 Comparison Example 1 A composite membrane was prepared according to the same method as Example 1, wherein an aqueous solution obtained by dissolving 2 g of methaphenilenediamine fresh from distillation in 100 mi of distilled water. Thus prepared membrane was subjected to the reverse osmosis chlorine resistance test under the same conditions as Example 1 to give initial performance values, water permeability of 26.5 /m2.hr and desalting percentage of 98.5%. The reverse osmosis test was again started under the same conditions and 100 hours later, the relation between water permeability and desalting percentage was 27.3 /m2.hr and 99.7%, the desalting percentage showing an improvement over the initial value. This relations, however, started changing its aspect and 200 hours later the relation was 41.9 #/m2.hr and 99.3%, 500 hours later 56.4 /m2.hr and 98.2%, and 1,000 hours later 67.3 /m2.hr and 93.2%, showing the gradual degradation of the membrane. Examples 2 X 6 Composite membranes were obtained in the same way as Example 1 except the use of amines described in Table 1 in the place of ethylenediamine. These membranes were subjected to the reverse osmosis oxidation resistance test under the same conditions as Example 1. The results are shown in Table 1. Compositions of these composite membrane active layer polymers estimated from the Na analytical values and the values obtained from elemental analyses of C, H, and N are shown in Table 2. Table 1 EMI30.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <SEP> Content <SEP> of <SEP> carbo- <SEP> *1 <SEP> RO <SEP> performance <SEP> *2 <tb> Example <SEP> Diamine <SEP> Cross-linking <SEP> xylate <SEP> groups <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <tb> <SEP> agent <SEP> (-COONa) <SEP> -------------------- <SEP> (millieguivalent/g) <SEP> (#/m2.hr) <SEP> (%) <tb> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <SEP> N-methyl- <SEP> Trimesic <SEP> 30.2 <SEP> 97.3 <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> ethylenediamine <SEP> acid <SEP> chloride <SEP> 2.17 <SEP> (21.6) <SEP> (98.9) <tb> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <SEP> N-methyl- <SEP> Trimesic <SEP> 25.7 <SEP> 93.4 <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> ethylenediamine <SEP> acid <SEP> chloride <SEP> 2.36 <SEP> (19.4) <SEP> (96.9) <tb> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <SEP> 1,3-diamion- <SEP> 31.4 <SEP> 98.6 <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> cyclohexane <SEP> do. <SEP> 1.12 <SEP> (23.5) <SEP> (99.4) <tb> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <SEP> 1,4-diamino- <SEP> 27.0 <SEP> 99.0 <tb> <SEP> 5 <SEP> cyclohexane <SEP> do. <SEP> 1.21 <SEP> (21.1) <SEP> (99.7) <tb> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <SEP> N-(w-hydroxyethyl) <SEP> 19.3 <SEP> 92.6 <tb> <SEP> 6 <SEP> ethylenediamine <SEP> do. <SEP> 1.98 <SEP> (15.4) <SEP> (97.9) <tb> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ *1 : The measurement was conducted by subjecting the refined cross-linked active layer polymer, which was obtained by eluting the microporous base material in chloroform from the composite membrane immersed in an aqueous solution of 0.1% NaOH for 24 hours, to the Na atom absorpiometric analysis. *2 : The values in parentheses show the membrane performances obtained from the continuous 1,000-hour reverse osmosis test. Table 2 EMI31.1 <SEP> Elemental <SEP> analytical <tb> Example <SEP> Na <SEP> analytical <SEP> value <SEP> (%) <tb> <SEP> value <SEP> (%) <SEP> C <SEP> H <SEP> N <SEP> Polymer <SEP> composition <SEP> * <tb> <SEP> CH3 <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> CH3 <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 2 <SEP> 4.98 <SEP> 47.56 <SEP> 6.36 <SEP> 11.10 <SEP> (-N-CH2CH2NHC-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-N-CH2CH2NHC-#-C-)0.83 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COON <SEP> C=O <tb> <SEP> C2H5 <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> C2H5 <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 3 <SEP> 5.43 <SEP> 57.81 <SEP> 6.82 <SEP> 10.38 <SEP> (-N-CH2CH2NHC-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-N-CH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)0.57 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> C=O <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 4 <SEP> 2.58 <SEP> 67.76 <SEP> 5.65 <SEP> 10.54 <SEP> (-NH-#-NHC-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-NH-#-NHC-#-C-)2.35 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> C=O <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 5 <SEP> 2.78 <SEP> 57.52 <SEP> 5.63 <SEP> 10.50 <SEP> (-NH-#-NHC-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-NH-#-NH-C-#-C-)2.10 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> C=O <tb> <SEP> CH2CH2OH <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> CH2CH2OH <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 6 <SEP> 4.54 <SEP> 55.17 <SEP> 4.95 <SEP> 9.90 <SEP> (-NCH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-N-CH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)0.79 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> C=O <tb> * The polymer compositions were estimated from Na analytical value and elemental analytical values of C, H, and N according to Example 1. Example 7 A composite membrane was obtained according to the same method as Example 1 except for the use of 5-chlorosulfonylisophthalic acid chloride as crosslinking agent in the place of trimesic acid chloride. As the result of Na analysis made according to Example 1, the obtained membrane was identified as the composite membrane comprising a cross-linked polymer layer having a polymer composition expressed by the following formula. EMI32.1 When this membrane was subjected to the reverse osmosis oxidation resistance test under the same conditions as Example 1, it represented initial values including the water permeability of 56.3 ±/m2.hr and desalting percentage of 89.2%. When the test was further continued under the same conditions, the performance values were 43.6 /m2.hr and 93.3% 200 hours later, 41.0 /m2.hr and 95.1% 500 hours later, and 37.4 ±/m2.hr and 97.7% 1,000 hours later respectively. Example 8 A composite membrane was obtained according to Example 1, wherein a mixture of trimesic acid chloride and isophthalic acid chloride at a mole ratio of 3:1 was used as cross-linking agent instead of the single use of trimesic acid chloride. The active polymer layer of this composite membrane was subjected to Na analysis and elemental analysis (C, H, N) according to Example 1 and the obtained results showed that this polymer was a cross-linked polymer having a polymer composition expressed by the following formula. EMI33.1 Na analytical value : 5.74%, C : 54.96%, H : 3.84%, N : 11.95% When this composite membrane was subjected to the reverse osmosis test under the same conditions as Example 1, it represented initial performance values including the water permeability of 54.1 ±/m2. hr and desalting percentage of 91.7%, followed by 48.2 L/m2.hr and 93.0% after the continuous 200-hour test, 45.5 Q/m2 hr and 95.4% 500 hours after the start of the test, and 39.4 /m2.hr and 96.3% 1,000 hours after the start of the test respectively. Examples 9 X 12 Composite membranes were obtained according to Example 1, wherein respective mixtures of a diamine and ethylenediamine at a mole ratio of 1:2 as described in the following Table 3 were used instead of the single use of ethylenediamine. These membranes were subjected to the reverse osmosis test under the same conditions as Example 1 and the following results were obtained as shown in Table 3. The polymer compositions of active polymer layers of these composite membranes are shown in Table 4. Table 3 EMI35.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <SEP> Reverse <SEP> osmosis <SEP> *2 <tb> <SEP> Corss-linking <SEP> -COONa <SEP> content <SEP> *1 <SEP> performances <tb> Example <SEP> Mixed <SEP> diamine <SEP> agent <SEP> (milliequivalent/g <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <tb> <SEP> (#/m2.hr) <SEP> (%) <tb> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <SEP> Ethylenediamine <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> 9 <SEP> methaphenilene- <SEP> Trimesic <SEP> acid <SEP> 1.31 <SEP> 32.5 <SEP> 97.4 <tb> <SEP> diamine <SEP> chloride <SEP> (28.2) <SEP> (98.2) <tb> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <SEP> Ethylenediamine <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> 10 <SEP> N,N'-dimethyl- <SEP> do. <SEP> 1.64 <SEP> 40.0 <SEP> 90.7 <tb> <SEP> ethylenediamine <SEP> (27.8) <SEP> (93.7) <tb> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <SEP> Ethylenediamine <SEP> + <SEP> 43.9 <SEP> 92.9 <tb> <SEP> 11 <SEP> piperazine <SEP> do. <SEP> 1.41 <SEP> (29.1) <SEP> (95.6) <tb> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <SEP> Ethylenediamine <SEP> + <tb> <SEP> 12 <SEP> 1,3-diaminocyclo- <SEP> do. <SEP> 1.25 <SEP> 26.3 <SEP> 98.6 <tb> <SEP> hexane <SEP> (20.5) <SEP> (99.4) <tb> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *1 : The polymer compositions were estimated from Na analytical values and elemental analytical values of C, H, and N according to Example 1. *2 : The valuesin parentheses show the membrane performances obtained from the continuous 1,000-hour reverse osmosis test. Table 4 EMI36.1 <SEP> Elemental <SEP> analytical <tb> Example <SEP> Na <SEP> analytical <SEP> value <SEP> (%) <tb> <SEP> value <SEP> (%) <SEP> C <SEP> H <SEP> N <SEP> Polymer <SEP> composition <SEP> * <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 9 <SEP> 3.02 <SEP> 59.31 <SEP> 4.37 <SEP> 11.74 <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-NH-#-NHC-#-C-)0.53 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> COONa <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)2.93 <SEP> (-NH-#-NHC-#-C-)0.43 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> C=O <SEP> C=O <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> CH3 <SEP> CH3 <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 10 <SEP> 3.77 <SEP> 57.42 <SEP> 4.08 <SEP> 11.83 <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NHC-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-N-CH2CH2N-C-#-C-)0.37 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> COONa <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> CH3 <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)1.95 <SEP> (-NCH2CH2N-C-#-C-)0.21 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> C=O <SEP> C=O <tb> Table 4 EMI37.1 <SEP> Elemental <SEP> analytical <tb> Example <SEP> Na <SEP> analytical <SEP> value <SEP> (%) <tb> <SEP> value <SEP> (%) <SEP> C <SEP> H <SEP> N <SEP> Polymer <SEP> composition <SEP> * <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 11 <SEP> 3.25 <SEP> 57.71 <SEP> 3.95 <SEP> 12.09 <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)1.0 <SEP> (-N#N-C-#-C-)0.15 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> COONa <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NH-C-#-C-)2.27 <SEP> (-N#N-C-#-C-)0.09 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> C=O <SEP> C=O <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> 12 <SEP> 2.87 <SEP> 60.45 <SEP> 4.40 <SEP> 11.79 <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NH-C-#-C)1.0 <SEP> (-NH-#-NH-C-#-C)0.42 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> COONa <SEP> COONa <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> (-NHCH2CH2NHC-#-C)2.64 <SEP> (-NH-#-NHC-#-C-)0.73 <tb> <SEP> # <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> C=O <SEP> C=O <tb> Example 13 X 17 Composite membranes were obtained according to Example 1, wherein respective aqueous solutions of 1/50 mole diamines described in the following Table 5 in the place of an aqueous solution of ethylenediamine. After the basic separation performance of these membranes were evaluated, the membranes were subjected to the chlorine resistance test and washing test with the use of a reducing agent to know how the membrane performances changed. Table 5 EMI38.1 <tb> <SEP> Performance <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> composite <SEP> membrane <SEP> a <tb> <SEP> Aliphatic <SEP> Initial <SEP> *1 <SEP> Post <SEP> *2 <tb> <SEP> Example <SEP> Initial <SEP> chlorine <SEP> test <tb> <SEP> diamine <SEP> performance <SEP> rformance <tb> <SEP> W.F. <SEP> R.S. <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <tb> <SEP> ( <SEP> :n2.hr) <SEP> w.p. <tb> <SEP> 13 <SEP> CH3 <SEP> 37.8 <SEP> 93.1 <SEP> 36.3 <SEP> 93.9 <tb> <SEP> H2NHCH2NH2 <tb> 14 <SEP> HzNH2H2 <SEP> t <SEP> H2 <SEP> 23.0 <SEP> 97.3 <SEP> 20.5 <SEP> 97.1 <tb> <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> 15 <SEP> H2NCH2 <SEP> + <SEP> H2NH2 <SEP> 28.0 <SEP> 96.8 <SEP> 23.2 <SEP> 98.0 <tb> <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> ICH3 <tb> <SEP> 16 <SEP> 2 <SEP> > <SEP> CH3 <SEP> 119.8 <SEP> 85.7 <SEP> 47.9 <SEP> 90.5 <tb> <SEP> CH3 <tb> <SEP> 17 <SEP> CH2'2 <SEP> 46.4 <SEP> 95.8 <SEP> 43.2 <SEP> 94.8 <tb> *1 : Data obtained under the conditions of 42.5 kg/cm2, 0.5% NaCQ, and 250C 2 hours after starting the test. *2 : After the initial performance values were measured, the 20-hour reverse osmosis test was conducted with the use of an aqueous solution of 1000 ppm hypochlorous acid. Then the data were obtained after the mem branes were washed with an aqueous solution of 300 ppm sodium hydro sulfite for 30 minutes. Examples 18 X 19 Composite membranes were obtained according to Example 1, wherein equimolar mixtures (as solutions of 0.2 wt % carbon tetrachloride), one consisting of trimesic acid chloride and isophthalic acid chloride and the other consisting of trimesic acid chloride and 5-sulfr.'sophthalic acid trichloride, were used as cross-linking agent instead of a single use of trimesic acid chloride. The basic separation performance and chlorine resistivity of these composite membranes were evaluated under the same conditions as Examples 13 X 17. The results are shown in Table 6. Table 6 EMI40.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- <tb> <SEP> Performance <SEP> of <SEP> composite <SEP> membrane <tb> <SEP> Coss-linking <SEP> Initial <SEP> Post <SEP> chlorine <tb> <SEP> Example <SEP> performance <SEP> test <SEP> performance <tb> <SEP> agent <tb> <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <tb> <SEP> (#/m2.hr) <SEP> <SEP> (%) <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <tb> --------------------------------------------------------------------18 <SEP> IPC*1/TMC*2 <SEP> 27.0 <SEP> 97.0 <SEP> 25.4 <SEP> 98.4 <tb> <SEP> -------------------------------------------------------------------- <tb> <SEP> 19 <SEP> SPC*3/TMC <SEP> 54.7 <SEP> 94.3 <SEP> 47.3 <SEP> 97.2 <tb> EMI40.2 Example 20 X 26 The membrane performance of eliminating watersoluble organic substances mentioned in the following Table 7 was evaluated with the use of the composite membrane of Example 1. Table 7 EMI41.1 <tb> <SEP> Composite <SEP> membrane <SEP> * <tb> <SEP> Organic <SEP> performance <tb> Example <tb> <SEP> substance <SEP> used <SEP> W.F. <tb> <SEP> (#/m2.hr) <tb> <SEP> 20 <SEP> Glucose <SEP> 50.7 <SEP> <SEP> 99.9 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> 21 <SEP> Sucrose <SEP> 49.8 <SEP> > <SEP> 99.9 <tb> <SEP> 22 <SEP> Leucine <SEP> 51.0 <SEP> 99.5 <tb> <SEP> 23 <SEP> Aspartic <SEP> acid <SEP> 58.8 <SEP> 99.6 <SEP> <tb> <SEP> 24 <SEP> Lactic <SEP> acid <SEP> 57.5 <SEP> 98.8 <tb> <SEP> 25 <SEP> Acetic <SEP> acid <SEP> 44.3 <SEP> 73.8 <tb> <SEP> 26 <SEP> Ethanol <SEP> 51.3 <SEP> 82.1 <tb> * Concentration of each solute : : 1.0 wt %,. (42.5 kg/cm2, 250C) Example 27 ¯ 30 A protective layer of 0.2 to 0.3um thick membrane was formed on the surface of composite membranes prepared according to Example 1 by coating the membranes with each of protective polymer solutions respectively having a composition as shown in Table 8. These composite membranes were subjected to the chlorine resistance test under the same conditions as Exaples 13 X 17 and the remarkably increase of long-period resistivity due to the presence of the protective layer was observed. Table 8 EMI42.1 <tb> <SEP> Performance <SEP> of <SEP> composite <SEP> membrane <tb> <SEP> Protective <SEP> Initial <SEP> Performance <SEP> Performance <tb> <SEP> Example <tb> layer <SEP> performance <SEP> 20 <SEP> hrs <SEP> late <SEP> 150 <SEP> hrs <SEP> later <tb> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <tb> <SEP> PVA <SEP> 5% <tb> 27 <SEP> 32.5 <SEP> 95.7 <SEP> 27.3 <SEP> 96.2 <SEP> 25.4 <SEP> 96.3 <tb> <SEP> Formalin <SEP> 1% <tb> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- <tb> <SEP> PVA <SEP> 5% <tb> 28*2 <SEP> Glutar <SEP> 1% <SEP> 41.2 <SEP> 93.3 <SEP> 36.4 <SEP> 94.7 <SEP> 31.8 <SEP> 95.1 <tb> <SEP> aldehyde <tb> <SEP> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <SEP> Poly-829*3 <SEP> caproamide <SEP> 1% <SEP> 39.8 <SEP> 94.0 <SEP> 31.3 <SEP> 97.2 <SEP> 27.4 <SEP> 97.8 <tb> <SEP> cac#2 <SEP> <SEP> 20% <tb> <SEP> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <tb> 30 <SEP> None <SEP> 57.6 <SEP> 96.3 <SEP> 51.3 <SEP> 97.2 <SEP> 98.3 <SEP> 92.3 <tb> *1 : Heat-treated at 1000C for 5 minutes. *2 : Heat-treated at 700C for 5 minutes. *3 : Heat-treated at 500C for 10 minutes. Examples 31 ¯ 33 and Comparison Example 2 The composite membranes (in Examples 31 ¯ 33) obtained according to Example 1 and the composite membrane (in Comparison Example 2) obtained according tc Comparison Example 1 were immersed in the respective solutions of 2% oxidizing agent shown in the following Table 9 at room temperature for 20 hours. The result showing the confirmed changes in the performance of the respective composite membranes is described in Table 9. Table 9 EMI43.1 <tb> <SEP> Performance <SEP> of <tb> <SEP> Oxidizing <SEP> composite <SEP> membrane <tb> ------------------------------------------------ W.F. <SEP> S.R. <SEP> W.F. <SEP> S.R. <tb> <SEP> Example <SEP> Initial <SEP> r <SEP> <SEP> immersion <tb> agent <SEP> performance <SEP> performance <tb> 31 <SEP> H2O2 <SEP> 57.3 <SEP> 95.9 <SEP> 56.2 <SEP> 96.9 <tb> <SEP> ------------------------------------------------ <SEP> 32 <SEP> NaBo4 <SEP> 59.1 <SEP> 96.4 <SEP> 47.3 <SEP> 96.7 <tb> ------------------------------------------------ <SEP> 33 <SEP> Iodophor <SEP> 63.0 <SEP> 95.1 <SEP> 65.5 <SEP> 95.5 <tb> Comparison <SEP> H202 <SEP> 61.4 <SEP> 96.3 <SEP> 350.1 <SEP> 54.3 <tb> <SEP> Example <SEP> 2 <tb> Industrial Application Having an outstanding resistance to oxidization in addition to an excellent selective permeability, the composite semipermeable membrane of the present invention can be used in a wide range of separation works in the fields of fresh water generation, enrichment of valuable substances, fractionation of water soluble organic substances, etc. Especially it can be effectively used for separation works in the field of food processing where microbes are apt to proliferate and yet conventional membranes are hardly used for lack of resistance against strong sterilizers and bactericides.

Claims: What we claim is 1. A composite semipermeable membrane compris- ing a microporous membrane and a cross-linked high polymer membrane formed thereon containing structural units expressed by the following formula (I) at a mole ratio of 50% at the least EMI44.1 wherein R1 indicates an alkyl group, which may contain a hydroxyl group, having 1 to 3 carbon atoms, or a hydrogen atom; R2 indicates an aliphatic hydrocarbon residue, which may contain an oxygen atom, having 2 to 15 carbon atoms; Ar indicates a condensed or noncondenced aromatic hydrocarbon residue; X indicates a carbonyl bond EMI44.2 or a sulfonyl bond (-SO2-); Y at least partly indicates a direct bond where corss-linking takes place and the rest indicates - OM or EMI44.3 where M indicates a hydrogen atom, alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, or ammonium group, and a definition of R3 is the same as that of R1, at least one R3 being a hydrogen atom. 2. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein R2 is an aliphatic hydrocarbon residue having 2 to 14 carbon atoms. 3. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein Ar is a condensed or noncondensed aromatic hydrocarbon residue having 6 to 15 carbon atoms. 4. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein R1 is a hydrogen atom. 5. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein the ratio of the direct bond of Y is in the range of 30 to 90%. 6. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein the ratio of the direct bond of Y is in the range of 50 to 708. 7. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein X is a carbonyl group. 8. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein said cross-linked high polymer membrane contains structural units expressed by the following formula (II) EMI45.1 wherein R4 and R5 are alkyl groups, each of which may independently contain a hydroxyl group, having 1 to 3 carbon atoms, or other wise R -and R5 are linked to one another or respectively to R6 to form a piperazyl group or dipiperidylalkylen group, which may be sub stituted by a methyl group or an ethyl group, together with two nitrogen atoms and R6 to which they are linked; R6 indicates an aliphatic hydrocarbon residue, which may contain an oxygen atom, having 2 to 15 carbon atoms. The defini tions of Ar, X and Y are the same as the afore mentioned ones. 9. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 8, wherein the structural units expressed by said formula (II) are contained at a mole ratio of 1% to 408. - 10. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein the membrane comprises structural units respectively expressed by the formula (I) and formula (II) in which R1 is a hydrogen atom; R2 and R6 are -C2H4-; Ar is EMI46.1 X is a carbonyl bond; Y is a direct bond; R4 and R5 are both ethyl groups or bond to another to form an ethylene group; and the structural units expressed by the formula (II) are continued at a mole ratio of 5% to 30%. 11. A composite semipermeable membrane accord ing to Claim 1, wherein said cross-linked high polymer membrane is further protected with a water-insoluble polyvinyl alcohol coating or a porous aliphatic polyamide coating. 12. A process for the preparation of a compo site semipermeable membrane which comprises reacting a diamine compound which contains a compound expressed by the following formula (III) at a mole ratio of 50% at the least R1NH - R2 - NH2 ¯¯¯-- (III) wherein definitions of R1 and R2 are the same as those given in the foregoing definitions; with a cross-linking agent mainly consisting of a compound expressed by the following formula (IV) on a microporous membrane EMI46.2 wherein Z's are the same or different from each other, indicating a halogen atom; X is a carbonyl bond EMI46.3 or a sulfonyl bond (-so2-). 13. A process for the preparation of a composite semipermeable membrane according to Claim 12, wherein said diamine compound contains a diamine compound expressed by the following formula (V) R4HN - R6 - NR5H ¯¯¯¯- (V) wherein definitions of R4, Rs and R6 are the same as those given already in the above. 14. A process for the preparation of a composite semipermeable membrane which comprises allowing the aforementioned diamine compound to react with the aforementioned cross-linking agent on a micro porous membrane, forming a polyvinyl alcohol coat ing thereon, and making thus formed polyvinyl alcohol coating water-insoluble. 15. A process for the preparation of a composite semipermeable membrane which comprises forming a porous protective coating of aliphatic polyamide which is obtained by applying a solution of aliphalit polyamide containing a poring agent to the surface of the membrane made by allowing the aforementioned diamine compound to react with the aforementioned cross-linking agent on a micro porous membrane, followed by extracting the above mentioned poring agent by elution after drying. 16. A method of using a composite semipermeable membrane, in cases where any of the composite semipermeable membranes mentioned in Claim 1 through Claim 11 is put to the reverse osmosis operation, characterised by the repeated use of said compo site semipermeable membrane comprising pasteuriz ing the membrane with an aqueous solution of pH 4 to pH 7 containing 0.5 to 5,000 ppm bactericide of chlorine type and then washing the membrane with an aqueous solution containing 10 to 5,000 ppm reducing agent, 17. A method of using a composite semipermeable membrane according to Claim 16, wherein said reverse osmosis operation is conducted for the treatment of an aqueous solution of saccharides, amino acids, alcohols and/or organic carboxylic acids.

Inventors: KAWAGUCHI, TAKEYUKI, TAMURA, HIROKI
Applicants: TEIJIN LIMITED
Application year: 1982
Main classification: B01D13
IPC codes: B01D69, B01D71, C08L1, C08L77, C08G73, C08L27