AN EFFICIENCY-IMPROVING AGENT FOR FEED AND A PREVENTIVE AND TREATING AGENT FOR COCCIDIOSIS

Abstract: An efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis which contains antibiotic 5057A and/or 5057B. The agent has a special feature of low toxicity. The antibiotics may be in the form of a physiologically acceptable salt such as sodium and potassium salts. The agent is used as a preparation such as powders, tablets, capsules, gra­ nules, and pills; however, usually it is used by directly incorporating it into feed or drinking water or by adding its dispersion in a diluent to feed or drinking water.

Description: AN EFFICIEtiCY-I9ROVIiQG AGENT FOR FEED AND A PREVENTIVE AND TREATING AGENT FOR COCCIDIOSIS FIELD OF THE INVENTION The prevent invention relates to an efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis containing antibiotics. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Attempts have already been made widely to promote the growth of and improve the fecundity of poultry and livestock by the addition of an antibiotic to feed. In the case of an antibiotic used in both man and animals, however, man is subject to deleterious effects such as the emergence of resistant bacteria and so forth since he is bound to simultaneously ingest the antibiotic that has remained and accumulated in the animal body when he eats the animals. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide an efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis which is free of the above-described drawbacks. As a result of extensive investigations it is found that antibiotics 5057A and 5057B can remarkably improve the efficiency of the utilization of a livestock and poultry feed and have a preventive and treating activity against livestock and poultry coccidiosis. The present invention is based on this finding and provides an efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis which - contains antibiotic 5057A or its physiologically acceptable salt and/or antibiotic 5057B or its physiologically acceptable salt as an effective ingredient. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Antibiotics 5057A and 5057B are the ones found in'a culture broth of a Streptomyces s.p. 5057 strain (FERM BP 62), method for the preparation of the antibiotics 5057A and 5057B and physical and chemical characteristics thereof are described in Japanese Patent Publication No. 8641/1979 and Japanese Patent Application No. 158856/1980, respectively. Both of the antibiotics are produced by cultivating a Streptomyces s.p. 5057 strain according to the usual method. The A and B substances can be isolated according to the ordinary method; they can also be obtained as a mixture. The antibiotics 5057A and 5057B both belong to an antibiotic of the polyether series and are knawn to have an excellent antibacterial activity. The effective ingredient of the composition of the present invention, antibiotic 5057A andlor 5057B can be used in the form of a purified preparation or a crude product, or as cells containing the effective ingredient. The antibiotics 5057A and 5057B may be in the form of a physiologically acceptable salt such as sodium and potassium salts. The efficiency-improving agent for feed or preventive and treating agent for coccidiosis is, used as a preparation, such as powders, tablets, capsules, granules, and pills, -that is prepared by either mixing or not mixing antibiotic 5057A and/or 5057B with a physiologically acceptable solid or liquid diluent; however, usually it is used by directly incorporating it into feed or drinking water or by adding its dispersion in a diluent to feed or drinking water. It is, when added to feed, used preferably as, for example, a premix prepared from it. The premix is obtained by mixing a purified product or a crude product of the effective ingredient, or cells containing it with a physiologically acceptable solid or liquid carrier. As a solid carrier, there are used, for example, flour, soybean powders, rice bran, corn powders, starch, glucose, yeast, fish meal, talc, and diatomaceus earth, etc. As a liquid carrier, there are used, for example, physiological saline solution, distilled water, and a physiologically acceptable organic solvent, etc. Further, - suitable supplementary agents or additives such as an emulsifying agent, dispersant, suspending agent, moistening agent, concentrating agent, gelation agent, antimicrobial agent, antiseptic agent, enzyme preparation, antibiotic, and lactic acid preparation, etc. can also be used in admixture with the foregoing preparations. The concentration of the effective ingredient in the premix can suitably be adjusted depending on the kind of livestock or poultry. The concentration for use of the efficiency-improving agent for feed of the present invention varies according to the kind and age of livestock or poultry; for example, in the case of poultry such as a domestic fowl, quail, turkey, guinea fowl, duck, and goose, it is administered as a feed containing usually 5 - 200 ppm, preferably 10 - 100 ppm, of the effective ingredient. There are used a feed containing. usually 5 - 200 ppm, preferably 10 - 100 ppm, of the effective ingredient in the case of swine and a feed containing usually 1 - 100 ppm, preferably 2 - 50 ppm, of the effective ingredient in the case of a ruminant such as cattle, sheep, and goat. As a preventive and treating agent for coccidiosis, there is used a feed containing 10 - 250 ppm, preferably 20 - 100 ppm, of the effective ingredient. The effective ingredient of the present invention, antibiotics 5057A and 5057B, are excellent in that it is effective in not only improving the efficiency of feed but also promoting the growth; it also has a special feature of low toxicity. The present agent, when administered to poultry, can improve the efficiency of feed, prevent the occurrence of coccidiosis which is dreadful for poultry, and cure the desease. On its administration to swine, it not only improves the efficiency of the feed utilization but also prevents and:cures diarrhea from which a young pig is liable to suffer. On its administration to a ruminant, an increased ratio of propionic acid to acetic and butyric acids in the rumen of the animal is observed. In general the utilization ratio of propionic acid is said to be large in the stomach of a ruminant, although a ruminant also utilizes acetic and butyric acid compounds in its stomach. It t is considered that the production of tropionic acid is promoted in the rumen by the administration of the present agent, and as a result the utilization efficiency of feed is improved. The present invention will be explained in detail by the following examples and test examples. EXAMPLE 1 5057A 1% cornstarch 99% The two substances are crushed and mixed uniformly to make a premix containing 1% of 5057A. EXAMPLE 2 5057B 5% soybean powders 95% A premix containing 5% of 5057B is prepared in the same manner as in Example 1. EXAMPLE 3 5057A o,5% 5057B 0.5% soybean cake 99% A premix containing 0.5% of 5057A and 0.5% of 5057B is prepared in the same manner as in Example 1. EXAMPLE 4 crude product of 5057A (40% purity) 2.5% crude product of 5057B (40% purity) 2.5% bran 95% The substances are crushed and mixed uniformly to make a premix containing 1.0% of 5057A and 1.0% of 5057B. EXAMPLE 5 Dried cultured cells (1000 g) containing 1.128 of 5057A and 0.86% of 5057B are crushed and used, as they are, as a premix. TEST EXAMPLE 1 Feed efficiency test on domestic fowls Domestic fowls tested: species used exclusively for broiler (Aber Acres species) Basal feed: yellow corn 42% flour 25% soybean cake 20% fish cake 8% alfalfa meal 3% tricalcium phosphate 1% calcium carbonate 0.25% table salt 0.45% vitamin 0.15% mineral 0.1% methionine 0.05% Method: Fifty newborn chickens were divided into 5 groups of 10 each in such a way that the average body weight is the same in each group. Premixes of 5057A and 5057B were added to the foregoing basal feed so that the contents of 5057A and 5057B are .40 ppm and 80 ppm, respectively. This feed was administered to the animals over the period of 70 days, and the body weight and the ingested amount of the feed were measured. The results are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 EMI8.1 Group <SEP> Substance <SEP> Added <SEP> The <SEP> average <SEP> The <SEP> average <SEP> The <SEP> average <SEP> The <SEP> rate <SEP> The <SEP> improved <tb> added <SEP> to <SEP> amount <SEP> body <SEP> weight <SEP> increase <SEP> in <SEP> ingested <SEP> of <SEP> feed <SEP> ratio <SEP> of <SEP> the <tb> the <SEP> feed <SEP> (ppm) <SEP> at <SEP> the <SEP> the <SEP> body <SEP> amount <SEP> of <SEP> requira- <SEP> rate <SEP> of <SEP> feed <tb> to <SEP> be <SEP> ad- <SEP> start <SEP> weight <SEP> dur- <SEP> feed <SEP> during <SEP> ment <SEP> requirement <tb> ministered <SEP> (g) <SEP> ing <SEP> the <SEP> test <SEP> the <SEP> test <SEP> (%) <tb> period <SEP> period <tb> (kg) <SEP> (kg) <tb> 1 <SEP> 5057A <SEP> 40 <SEP> 43.5 <SEP> 2.54 <SEP> 5.59 <SEP> 2.201 <SEP> 4.3 <tb> 2 <SEP> " <SEP> 80 <SEP> 43.1 <SEP> 2.55 <SEP> 5.63 <SEP> 2.218 <SEP> 4.0 <tb> 3 <SEP> 5057B <SEP> 40 <SEP> 43.5 <SEP> 2.67 <SEP> 5.74 <SEP> 2.150 <SEP> 6.6 <tb> 4 <SEP> " <SEP> 80 <SEP> 43.2 <SEP> 2.62 <SEP> 5.67 <SEP> 2.164 <SEP> 6.0 <tb> 5 <SEP> no <SEP> 0 <SEP> 43.6 <SEP> 2.46 <SEP> 5.66 <SEP> 2.301 <SEP> addition <tb> The rate of feed The average ingested amount of feed during the test period = requirement The average increase in the body weight during the test period EMI8.2 The <SEP> improved <SEP> The <SEP> rate <SEP> of <SEP> feed <SEP> reguirement <SEP> in <SEP> the <tb> ratio <SEP> of <SEP> the <SEP> case <SEP> of <SEP> the <SEP> addition <SEP> of <SEP> the <SEP> agent <tb> = <SEP> #1 <SEP> - <SEP> # <SEP> x <SEP> 100 <tb> rate <SEP> of <SEP> feed <SEP> The <SEP> rate <SEP> of <SEP> feed <SEP> requirement <SEP> in <SEP> the <tb> requirement <SEP> (%) <SEP> case <SEP> of <SEP> no <SEP> addition <SEP> of <SEP> the <SEP> agent <tb> The administration of the feed to which the present substances had been added improved the rate of feed requirement by 4 - 6.5% and the increase in the body weight by 3 - 9%. TEST EXAMPLE 2 Feed efficiency test on swine Swine tested; landrace Basal feed: a. the start of the test - 4 weeks cereals (corn, wheat, barley) 60% soybean oil cake 15% feed of an animal nature (defatted powdered milk, fish meal) 15% others (enzyme, calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, table salt, etc.) 10t b. 4 - 12 weeks cereals (corn, milo, wheat) 78% soybean oil cake 13% fish meal 5% others (table salt, calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, etc.) 4% Method: Thirty young pigs were divided into 5 groups of 6 each in such a way that the average body weight is the same in each group. To the basal feed were added 0, 25, and 50 ppm each of 5057A and 5057B. The resulting basal feeds were administered over the period of 12 weeks and the body weight and the ingested amount of the feeds were measured. The total number of days that the pigs suffered from diarrhea during the period of 4 weeks was counted. The results are shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 EMI11.1 <tb> <SEP> a <SEP> cu <tb> <SEP> C <SEP> k <SEP> m <SEP> C <SEP> a <SEP> a <tb> <SEP> \o <SEP> (d <SEP> -rl <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> a: <SEP> brlr <SEP> k <tb> <SEP> E(Ubr <tb> <SEP> r <SEP> cclpe <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> 0 <SEP> k <SEP> n <SEP> u, <SEP> cx, <SEP> co <SEP> co <SEP> a, <tb> <SEP> id <SEP> =i <SEP> \3 <SEP> o <SEP> \o <SEP> z > <SEP> ro <SEP> u, <tb> <SEP> I <SEP> a, <SEP> \a <SEP> v, <SEP> rd <SEP> cl <SEP> r( <SEP> rl <SEP> rl <tb> <SEP> Q <SEP> d) <SEP> a, <tb> <SEP> dkr4 <SEP> a <SEP> r( <SEP> oo <SEP> u, <tb> <SEP> auoc <SEP> F: <SEP> U <SEP> rl <SEP> M <tb> <SEP> caouo <SEP> <tb> <SEP> tHrirdk <tb> <SEP> added <SEP> to <SEP> amount <SEP> body <SEP> weight <SEP> increase <SEP> m <SEP> ingested <SEP> of <SEP> feed <SEP> ratio <SEP> t7r <tb> <SEP> aa <tb> <SEP> (UdO) <tb> <SEP> 3-IJa)C <tb> <SEP> O <SEP> (kg) <SEP> ing <SEP> the <SEP> the <SEP> test <SEP> each <SEP> df <SEP> days <tb> <SEP> test <SEP> period <SEP> period <SEP> group <SEP> during <SEP> the <tb> <SEP> O"WQ)dP <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> m <SEP> test <SEP> period <tb> <SEP> -rl <SEP> O <SEP> I <tb> <SEP> in <SEP> each <SEP> je <SEP> Q) <tb> <SEP> &commat; ;XX <SEP> a <tb> <SEP> AacdQ) <tb> <SEP> kkk <tb> 1 <SEP> 5057A <SEP> 25 <SEP> 6.83 <SEP> 45.35 <SEP> 106.7 <SEP> 2.353 <SEP> 4.3 <SEP> 21/168 <tb> <SEP> aa, <tb> <SEP> IdQ)k <SEP> m <SEP> cb <SEP> m <SEP> o <tb> 2 <SEP> 50 <SEP> 6.80 <SEP> 50.93 <SEP> 116.5 <SEP> 2.287 <SEP> 7.0 <SEP> U) <tb> <SEP> Iw <SEP> I <SEP> +r <SEP> m <SEP> cu <SEP> m <SEP> cu <tb> <SEP> Q)C <SEP> <tb> 3 <SEP> 5057B <SEP> 25 <SEP> 6.82 <SEP> 47.62 <SEP> 111.8 <SEP> 2.348 <SEP> 4.6 <SEP> 18/168 <tb> a, <SEP> F: <tb> <SEP> Id <SEP> lurl <tb> IkaokIJ <tb> lara, <SEP> Im <SEP> Is <SEP> y) <SEP> 107.5 <SEP> 2.460 <SEP> 0 <SEP> o <SEP> e <tb> <SEP> tion <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> Wa <SEP> $ <SEP> om <SEP> W <SEP> W <SEP> H <SEP> W <SEP> F <tb> <SEP> &commat; <SEP> De <SEP> vtx <SEP> o <SEP> H <SEP> o <tb> <SEP> &commat; <SEP> m0 <SEP> &commat; <SEP> &commat; <SEP> h¯ <SEP> H <SEP> H <SEP> H <SEP> H <SEP> H <tb> <SEP> f <SEP> < , <SEP> e <SEP> X <tb> <SEP> &commat; <tb> <SEP> > H <SEP> s <SEP> o <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> a <SEP> z <tb> <SEP> St <SEP> &commat; <tb> <SEP> &commat; <SEP> e <SEP> X <SEP> N <SEP> W <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> > <SEP> < <SEP> o = <SEP> Am <SEP> n <SEP> W <SEP> <SEP> F <tb> <SEP> d <SEP> &commat; <SEP> Q <SEP> = <SEP> X <SEP> X <tb> <SEP> S4 <SEP> > <SEP> 4 <SEP> In <SEP> O <SEP> F <SEP> rx <tb> <SEP> &commat; <SEP> U <SEP> ZDÇ <SEP> > <SEP> qX <SEP> s <tb> <SEP> E <SEP> i <SEP> 4J <SEP> 3 <SEP> <SEP> 4] <tb> <SEP> &commat; <SEP> X <tb> <SEP> bz <tb> <SEP> &commat; <SEP> e <SEP> n <SEP> o <SEP> N <SEP> X <SEP> e <tb> <SEP> > <SEP> 3 <SEP> &commat; <SEP> ¯ <SEP> > <SEP> <tb> <SEP> 24] <SEP> St <SEP> X <SEP> W <SEP> W <SEP> W <SEP> W <SEP> W <tb> <SEP> &commat; <tb> <SEP> x <SEP> 04J4Z <tb> <SEP> E4n <SEP> Z <SEP> X <tb> <SEP> 4 <tb> <SEP> e <SEP> a <SEP> e <tb> <SEP> g <SEP> o <SEP> z <SEP> U1 <SEP> 0 <SEP> U) <SEP> O <SEP> O <tb> <SEP> s <SEP> z <SEP> N <SEP> <SEP> <tb> <SEP> e <tb> <SEP> &commat; <tb> <SEP> u <SEP> o <SEP> e <SEP> X <SEP> S <SEP> < <SEP> m <SEP> ffi <tb> <SEP> n <SEP> b <SEP> > <SEP> ¯t <tb> <SEP> U <SEP> &commat; <SEP> fi <SEP> e <SEP> = <SEP> = <SEP> g <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> o <SEP> o <SEP> g <tb> <SEP> Q <SEP> g <SEP> &commat; <SEP> < <SEP> e <SEP> d <SEP> < <tb> <SEP> DUx <SEP> o-d <SEP> 0vs <tb> <SEP> U] <SEP> < <SEP> X <tb> <SEP> Q <tb> <SEP> n <tb> <SEP> sO4 <SEP> -t <SEP> N <SEP> n <SEP> s <tb> <SEP> w <tb> The administration of the feeds to which the present substances had been added improved the rate of the feed utilization by 4 - 8% and the increased amount of the body weight by 4 - 17%. A marked decrease in the occurrence of swine diarrhea was also observed. TEST EXAMPLE 3 Feed efficiency test on a ruminant Cattle tested: Holstein Basal feed: Concentrated feed: New king beef, later period 66% (prepared by Kumiai Feed Co., Ltd.) flake corn 17% flake barley 17% Method: Twenty five castrated Holstein oxen 9 months of age were divided into 5 groups of 5 each in such a way that the average body weight is almost the same in each group. Concentrated basal feeds to which 0, 10, and 20 ppm each of 5057A and 5057B had been added were each administered over the period of 240 days. As a crude feed, 1 kg per animal of straw of rice plants were administered. The results are shown in Table 3 below. Table 3 EMI13.1 Group <SEP> Substance <SEP> Added <SEP> The <SEP> average <SEP> The <SEP> average <SEP> The <SEP> average <SEP> The <SEP> rate <SEP> of <SEP> The <SEP> improved <tb> added <SEP> to <SEP> amount <SEP> body <SEP> weight <SEP> increase <SEP> in <SEP> ingested <SEP> concentrated <SEP> ratio <SEP> of <SEP> the <tb> the <SEP> feed <SEP> (ppm) <SEP> at <SEP> the <SEP> the <SEP> body <SEP> amount <SEP> of <SEP> feed <SEP> re- <SEP> rate <SEP> of <SEP> conto <SEP> be <SEP> ad- <SEP> start <SEP> weight <SEP> dur- <SEP> concentrated <SEP> quirement <SEP> centrated <tb> ministered <SEP> (kg) <SEP> ing <SEP> the <SEP> feed <SEP> during <SEP> feed <SEP> retest <SEP> period <SEP> the <SEP> test <SEP> quirement <tb> (kg) <SEP> period <SEP> (%) <tb> (kg) <tb> 1 <SEP> 5057A <SEP> 10 <SEP> 335 <SEP> 271 <SEP> 2413 <SEP> 8.904 <SEP> 10.2 <tb> 2 <SEP> " <SEP> 20 <SEP> 325 <SEP> 280 <SEP> 2365 <SEP> 8.446 <SEP> 14.8 <tb> 3 <SEP> 5057B <SEP> 10 <SEP> 345 <SEP> 273 <SEP> 2406 <SEP> 8.813 <SEP> 11.1 <tb> 4 <SEP> " <SEP> 20 <SEP> 327 <SEP> 284 <SEP> 2354 <SEP> 8.289 <SEP> 16.4 <tb> 5 <SEP> no <SEP> 0 <SEP> 337 <SEP> 262 <SEP> 2598 <SEP> 9.916 <SEP> addition <tb> The administration of the feeds to which the present substances had been added improved the utilization rate of the concentrated feed by 10 - 17% and the increased amount of the body weight by 3 - 8%. The gastric juice from the rumen of the oxen tested was collected and measured for the concentrations of acetic and propionic acids, thus the ratio between them being calculated. The results are shown in Table 4 below. Table 4 EMI15.1 Substance <SEP> Amount <SEP> The <SEP> propionic <SEP> acid <SEP> concentration/The <SEP> acetic <SEP> acid <SEP> concentration <tb> added <SEP> to <SEP> added <SEP> (the <SEP> average <SEP> value) <tb> the <SEP> feed <tb> to <SEP> be <SEP> ad- <SEP> (ppm) <SEP> Before <SEP> the <SEP> 1 <SEP> day <SEP> after <SEP> 21 <SEP> days <SEP> after <SEP> 56 <SEP> days <SEP> after <tb> ministered <SEP> start <SEP> of <SEP> the <SEP> admini- <SEP> the <SEP> admini- <SEP> the <SEP> adminithe <SEP> admini- <SEP> stration <SEP> stration <SEP> stration <tb> stration <tb> 5057A <SEP> 10 <SEP> 0.51 <SEP> 0.80 <SEP> 0.73 <SEP> 0.78 <tb> 20 <SEP> 0.54 <SEP> 0.83 <SEP> 0.96 <SEP> 0.86 <tb> 5057B <SEP> 10 <SEP> 0.54 <SEP> 0.79 <SEP> 0.76 <SEP> 0.77 <tb> 20 <SEP> 0.52 <SEP> 0.83 <SEP> 1.00 <SEP> 0.93 <tb> - <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0.56 <SEP> 0.51 <SEP> 0.63 <SEP> 0.58 <tb> It can be learned that the administration of 5057A or 5057B increases the ratio between propionic acid/acetic acid in.the gastric juice in the rumen as compared with the case of no addition. This fact can be considered to be responsible for the improvement in the efficinecy rate of the feed utilization. TEST EXAMPLE 4 The preventive and treating activity against coccidiosis in a domestic fowl Domestic fowls tested: white leghorns Basal feed: corn 47% soybean powders 15% soybean cake 15% flour 10% fish meal 7% alfalfa meal 3.88 tricalcium phosphate 1% calcium carbonate 0.38 table salt 0.58 vitamin 0.2% mineral 0.1t methionine 0.1% Method: Fifty male white leghorn chickens 14 days of age were divided into 5 groups of 10 each. To the basal feed were added 50 and 100 ppm each of 5057A and 5057B. Infection with coccidiosis was done by inoculating 7 x 1014 per chicken of spore-forming oocysts of Eimeria tenellum directly p.o. into the crop of the chickens. Groupsl - 4 were reared with the feeds containing predetermined concentrations of the 5057 substances, starting from 1 day before the inoculation with oocysts. Group 5 is an infection control that was inoculated with oocysts and reared with the basal feed containing no agents tested and Group 6 is a non infection control. After 7 days after the inoculation with oocysts, the number of oocysts (OPG) in 1 g of stool was counted. The results are shown in Table 5 below. Dead chickens upon termination of the test Death rate.= x 100 Number of chickens on the day of the start of the test Table 5 EMI17.1 <tb> Group <SEP> Substance <SEP> Amount <SEP> of <SEP> Death <SEP> Relation <SEP> rate <SEP> OPG <tb> <SEP> given <SEP> the <SEP> ad- <SEP> rate <SEP> of <SEP> the <SEP> in- <SEP> (x <SEP> 104) <tb> <SEP> ministra- <SEP> (%) <SEP> crease <SEP> in <SEP> the <tb> <SEP> tion <SEP> (ppm) <SEP> body <SEP> weight(%) <tb> <SEP> 1 <SEP> 5057A <SEP> 50 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 104 <SEP> 0.02 <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> " <SEP> 100 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 103 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> 5057B <SEP> 50 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 106 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> " <SEP> 100 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 106 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> 5 <SEP> Infection <SEP> 0 <SEP> 50 <SEP> 79 <SEP> 87 <tb> <SEP> control <tb> <SEP> 6 <SEP> Noninfec- <SEP> 0 <SEP> 0 <SEP> 100 <SEP> 0 <tb> <SEP> tion <tb> <SEP> control <tb> From the test results, it can be learned that antibiotics 5057A and 5057B have a preventive and treating activity against coccidiosis. TEST EXAMPLE 5 Acute toxicity An acute toxicity test was carried out with mice. As a result, the LD50 value of the 5057A and 5057B substances is 50 mg/kg i.p. and 50 mg/kg or more p.o. Antibiotic EMI19.1 Antibiotic EMI20.1

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. An efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis, characterized in that it contains antibiotic 5057A or its physiologically acceptable salt and/or antibiotic 5057B or its physiologically acceptable salt as an effective ingredient. 2. The efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed according to Claim 1 in which the amount of the effective ingredient is 5 - 200 ppm, 3. The preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis according to Claim 1 in which the amount of the effective ingredient is 10 - 250 ppm. 4. The efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 in which the feed or agent is in the form of powders, tablets, capsules, granules, dr pills. 5. The efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 in which the agent is a premix comprising a purified product or a crude product of the effective ingredient, or cells containing it and a physiologically acceptable solid or liquid carrier. 6 . The efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed according to Claim 5 in which the solid carrier is flour, soybean powders, rice bran, corn powders, starch, glucose, yeast, fish meal, talc, or diatomaceous earth. 7.. The efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed according to Claim 5 in which the liquid carrier is a physiological saline solution, distilled water, or a physiologically acceptable organic solvent. 8. The efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or a poultry feed or a preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 which contains a supplementary agent or additive, 9.. The efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feedior the preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis according to Claim 8 in which the supplementary agent or additive is an emulsifying agent, dispersant, suspending agent, moistening agent, concentrating agent, gelatin agent, antimicrobial agent, antiseptic agent, enzyme preparation, antibiotic, or lactic acid preparation. 10. Use of antibiotic 5057A or its physiologically acceptable salt and/or antibiotic 5057B or its physiologically acceptable salt for preparing the efficiency-improving agent for a livestock or poultry feed or the preventive and treating agent for livestock or poultry coccidiosis according to claims 1 to 9.

Inventors: KUSAKABE, YOKO KAKEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, LIMITED, MIZUNO, TAKU KAKEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, LIMITED, SEINO, AKIO KAKEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Applicants: KAKEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, LTD.
Application year: 1982
Main classification: A23K1
IPC codes: A23K1, A61P33, A61K31, C07D407