PROCESS FOR PREPARING ASYMMETRIC UREAS FROM URETHANS AND AMINES

Abstract: A process is described for synthesising asymmetric ureas from amines and carbamates in the presence of catalysts chosen from the alkoxide and/or alkaline hy­ drate class.

Description: This invention relates to a process for synthesising asymmetric ureas with either aromatic or aliphatic substituents, which utilises the reaction between an amine and a carbamate. Asymmetric ureas are generally used industrially as active principles in the formulation of pesticides and in particular herbicides, and are normally produced by reacting an isocyanate or carbamoyl chloride with an amine. However, this type of industrial production has considerable problems, the most apparent of which relates to the high toxicity of the substances used in the synthesis. In this respect, particular care and special technical arrangements must be used in the transportation, storage and handling of reactants such as carbamoyl chlorides, isocyanates and amines. This fact becomes even more important when considering that both isocyanates and carbamoyl chlorides are synthesised by reacting an amine with phosgene, their production thus leading to further risks and considerable environmental and ecological problems. The compounds used in the various stages of the described synthesis have a very low toxicological threshold limit value, so that operational safety problems become of overriding importance in the construction of industrial plants. In addition, the need to dispose of saline effluents means that the pollution problem can in no way be ignored. According to the present invention, the process for preparing asymmetric ureas can be described by the following general equation: EMI2.1 where the aminolysis reaction proceeds with the formation of urea and alcohol. In particular, according to the process of the present invention, the substituents indicated by R,R', R", R"' can be of the following type: P - alkyl or aryl, and in particular the aryl group can carry substituents at the nucleus. R can therefore be methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, cyclohexyl, cyclooctyl, phenyl, 3-chlorophenyl, 4-chlorophenyl, 4-methyl 3-chlor ophenyl, 3,4-dichlorophenyl, 4-methoxy-3-chlorophenyl, 3trifluoromethylphenyl, or 4-parachlorophenoxyphenyl. R' - i.e. the substituent at the carbamate oxygen - is generally an alkyl or benzyl radical such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, benzyl, or cyclohexyl. Rl', R'l' are equal or different groups chosen from alkyl and aryl (this latter can comprise substituents at the nucleus), such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, cyclohexyl, methoxy, phenyl, methylphenyl, or chlorophenyl. In this manner, the amines used in the asymmetric urea synthesis reactions can be primary or secondary, aliphatic and/or aromatic according to the type of substituent used. The reaction for forming asymmetric ureas from carbamates and amines can be carried out in mass or in an inert solvent with or without the addition of suitable catalysts. then the reaction is carried out in the absence of catalysts, it is necessary to operate at a higher temperature of around 16000 and for a longer time, of 5 to 6 hours. In addition, in this case, although a very high conversion value is obtained, the selectivity in terms of the product is relatively low (the yield is about 50 to 60%). In contrast, if catalysts having basic characteristics are present chosen from the alkoxide or alkaline hydrate class, the operation can be carried out at a much lower temperature, of 100 to 1200C, and the reaction time becomes much shorter, of the order of 1.5 to 3 hours. The catalyst:amine molar ratio varies from 1:5 to 1:100. If catalysts of the alkoxide type are used, it is preferable for the alkoxyl radical to be of the same type as that of the starting carbamate. In the case of reactions carried out in the presence of catalysts, the yield is very much higher (65-805-! as recrystallised product), and with a much higher selectivity. However, even if operating with an excess of amine over the stoichiometric value with respect to the carbamate, total carbamate conversion is not attained. A particularly important aspect of the process consists of the fact that the yield of the desired product can be substantially increased up to practically quantitative if the alcohol produced is removed from the system during the course of the reaction, continuously and/or in stages. The following represent non-limiting examples of the present invention. w2AIv2LE 1 50 g of toluene, 13 g of di-n-butylamine (0.1 moles) and 8.5 g of ethyl carbanilate (0.0515 moles) are fed into a 150 cc stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave is placed in a bath,temperature controlled at 1650C for six hours and is stirred continuously. At the end of the six hours, the autoclave is removed from the temperature controlled bath and allowed to cool. The autoclave is opened, and 15 cc of 18% HC1 in water are added to the reaction mixture in order to separate the unreacted di-n-butylamine in the form of hydrochloride. The organic layer is then separated from the water, and the product is separated by fractional crystallisation from n-hexaneO In this manner, a very voluminous flaky white solid is obtained (I:iP 800C), its infrared (IR) spectrum and mass spectrum confirming that the product is l-l-di-n-butyl 3-phenyS urea. 6.93 g of urea are obtained from the fractional crystallisation, equivalent to a yield of 54.3% and a carbanilate conversion of 65.5 mol %. EXAIPL 2 14.2 g (0.2 moles) of diethylamine, 8.5 g (0.05 moles) of ethylcarbanilate, and 50 g of toluene are fed into the same autoclave, and the reaction system is heated to 165 for three hours. The procedure of example 1 is then followed in order to separate the reaction product. A carbanilate conversion of 81.5 mol % is obtained, with an asymmetric urea yield of 62.8%. EXAMPLE.3 13 g of di-n-butylamine, 8.5 g of ethyl carbanilate, 0.18 g of sodium ethylate and 50 g of toluene are'fed into the autoclave. The mixture is kept at a temperature of 1200C for three hours4 On termination of the reaction, the procedure of the preceding examples is followed in order to separate the final product. The asymmetric urea yield is 74.6%, the remainder being unconverted product. EXAEIPLE 4 The reaction was carried out in a 250 cc flask fitted with a thermometer, magnetic stirrer and a Vigreux fractionation column connected to a collection flask by way of a condenser. 13 g of di-n-butylamine, 8.5 g of ethyl carbanilate, 0.18 g of sodium ethylate and 50 g of toluene were fed in, and the mixture was reacted for 1.5 hours at 1200C. An asymmetric urea yield of 58.8% was obtained, with a carbanilate conversion of 60.6%. EXJU.lPLE 5 13 g of di-n-butylamine, 8.5 g of ethyl carbanilate, 0.18 g of sodium ethylate and 50 g of toluene are fed into the device illustrated in example 4. The mixture is kept at a temperature of 1200C for three hours in a temperature controlled bath. However, the ethanol which forms is distilled off during the reaction, and the toluene and residual amine are removed under vacuum at the end in order to recover the product. This is crystallised in the usual manner from n-hexane, to obtain a product with a yield of 95%, the remainder being unconverted substance. EXAMPLE 6 7.8 g of di-n-butylamine, 8.58 g of ethyl carbanilate, 0.09 g of sodium ethylate and 50 g of toluene are fed into the system. The experiment is carried out under the same conditions as example 5. The final urea yield is 88. EXAPEPLE 7 6.51 g of cyclohexylamine, 8.54 g of ethyl carbanilate, 0.18g of sodium ethylate and 60 g of toluene are fed into the system. The reaction mixture is kept in a bath, temperature controlled at 1200C for 2 hours 15 minutes. As in the case of examples 5 and 6, the ethanol is distilled off as it forms in the reaction, and the toluene and unreacted amine are removed at the end under vacuum. The final product obtained by fractional crystallisation as in the preceding examples was analysed by Ni':R, mass spectrometry and IR methods, from which the product was found to be N-phenyl-N'-cyclohexyl urea (1P 178-1790C). The yield is 92% (as recrystallised product). EXAMPLE 8 The experiment of the preceding example is repeated, changing only the operating temperature which in this case was 10000. A recrystallised product yield of 84% is obtained. EXAMPLE 9 Operating as in example 5, 11.5 g (0.0540 moles) of 3-chloro 4-methyl-ethylcarbanilate, 10.4 g (0.1031 moles) of di-npropylamine, 0.18 g of sodium ethylate and 50.5 g of toluene are fed into the system. The mixture is reacted at 1150C for 3 hours. The carbanilate conversion was approximately 10096, with an asymmetric urea selectivity of 98'. EXAMPLE 10 Operating as in example 4, 4.92 g (0.028 moles) of ST-cyclo- hexyl-ethylcarbamate, 7.43 g (0.057 moles) of di-n-butylamine, 0.68 g of 20% EtONa in EtOH and 30 g of toluene are fed into the system. The mixture is reacted for 3 hours at 1150C and the ethanol is distilled off as it forms. The carbamate conversion is 96, The asymmetric urea yield, as product recrystallised from n-hexane, is 885: (6.26 g) with M.P. of 70-71 C.

Claims: CLAIiNS 1. A process for preparing asymmetric ureas of formula RIH-CO-NR"R"', where R, R", R"' can consist of alkyl or aryl radicals, characterised by reacting together, in the presence of a catalyst, an amine of formula R"-NH-R"' and a carbamate of formula RNH-CO-OR', where R' is an alkyl or aryl radical, and the alcohol which forms is removed during the course of the reaction. 2. A process for preparing asymmetric ureas as claimed in claim 1, wherein R can be chosen from methyl, ethyl, n propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, cyclo hexyl, phenyl, 3-chlorophenyl, 4-chlorophenyl, 4-methyl 3-chlorophenyl, 3 ,4-dichlorophenyl, 4-methoxy-3-chloro phenyl, 3-trifluoromethylphenyl, and 4-parachlorophenoxy phenyl. 3. A process for preparing asymmetric ureas as claimed in claim 1, wherein R" and R"' can be chosen from methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, cyclohexyl, methoxyphenyl, methylphenyl and chlorophenyl. 4. A process for preparing asymmetric ureas as claimed in claim 1,- wherein R' can be chosen from methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, benzyl and cyclohexyl. 5. A process as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the catalyst is chosen from compounds pertaining to the alkoxide and/or alkaline hydrate class. 6. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the reaction is carried out at a temperature of between 50 and 2000C. 7. A process as claimed in the preceding claim, wherein the reaction is carried out preferably at a temperature of between 100 and 150 C. 8. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of the chosen catalyst to the carbamate lies between 1:1 and 1:1000. 9. A process as claimed in the preceding claim, wherein the molar ratio of the catalyst to the carbamate lies between 1:10 and 1:100. 10. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the molar ratio of the amine to the carbamate varies from 10:1 to 1:10. 11. A process as claimed in the preceding claim, wherein the molar ratio of the amine to the carbamate preferably lies between 1:1 and 4:1.

Inventors: FORNASARI, GIANCARLO, ROMANO, UGO
Applicants: ANIC S.P.A.
Application year: 1982
Main classification: C07C127
IPC codes: C07C273