DIRECTED FLOW, THIN LAYER GLASS FUSION

Abstract: Discrete bodies of glass-forming raw materials are formed by agglomerating techniques such as briquetting. These bodies are preheated or prereacted using waste heat from the fusion furnace. The hot glass bodies are charged to a refractory hearth heated to a temperature substantially above the temperature at which the glass product becomes fluid. The discrete bodies absorb heat, form a liquid phase and lose their morphology. The hearth is structured so that the liquid phase flows through it in a thin layer entraining any unreacted/unmelted material. As the molten material flows it is further heated and the reaction is completed. Molten glass product can be drawn from the hearth in a surprisingly short time after charging the heated discrete bodies to the hearth.

Description: DIRECTED FLOW , THIN LAYER GLASS FUSION τ This application is a continuation in part of our «, co-pending patent application Serial Number 270,330, filed June 4, 1981. Background of the Invention 5 This invention generally relates to the preparation of soluble and insoluble glasses. More particularly, this invention relates to an integrated energy-efficient method for producing silicate glasses by means of a directed flow, thin layer reactor or hearth. 10 In this application the terms "glass" or "insoluble glass" will be applied to the familiar insoluble mate¬ rials, while the term "soluble glass" or "soluble silicate glass" will be applied to those materials that consist of alkali metal and silica and are dissolved to form the com- 15 mercial class of.materials known as silicates. Soluble and insoluble silicate glasses are formed by the fusion of glass-forming materials in a furnace or hearth which is commonly called a glass tank. The raw materials are charged to the furnace heated to a tempera- 20 ture above the initial fusion point of the glass batch raw materials to form a molten bath. Such raw materials are generally referred to as "batch" and the "batch" ingredi¬ ents common to most glasses are sodium carbonate (soda ash) and a source of silica such as sand. Other widely 25 used ingredients primarily used in the production of in¬ soluble glasses include: lime, limestone, borax, potash, t , alumina and salt cake. The "batch" is charged to the fur¬ nace and floats on the molten glass bath until it melts * and reacts to become part of the bath which is eventually 30 drawn from the furnace as the product. This process has been practiced for over 100 years, and is still widely used despite numerous shortcomings. The usual glass-making furnaces are exceedingly energy-intensive and, indeed, inefficient. These glass O P furnaces are usually large refractory structures, so that the heat lost to the walls is considerable. Insulation possibilities are limited, since operation of the furnace is by thermal convection in the molten bath, said convec- tion currents being generated by hot and cold spots in the furnace. The "batch" floating on the molten glass is almost a perfect insulator, which prevents rapid heat transfer to the molten glass. The glass must have a con¬ siderable residence time- in the furnace to achieve homogeneity. This increased .holding time also requires more energy. Indeed, these heat requirements and losses are such that it is conventionally assumed that only about 1/3 of the energy consumed in a glass furnace is directed to forming glass. In recent years, some attempts have been made to improve this process and the manner in which heat is utilized. In general these attempts involve agglomerating the "batch" in some manner and then pre-heating these materials before charging them to the furnace. U.S. Patents 3,542,534; 3,607,190; 3,726,697; 3,788,832; 3,800,639; 3,953,190; 4,023,976; 4,045,197 and 4,135,904 among others disclose various means for attempting to increase the efficiency of the glass-making process. These techniques can achieve some increased heat utiliza- tion since furnace combustion gases are used as a source of heat. However, the benefits of these processes are minimal since the conventional inefficient glass furnace with a molten glass bath of substantial depth is still the means of forming a molten glass. It is an object of this invention to provide a new, more energy-efficient process for reacting and melting glass "batch" to form molten glass. It is a further ob¬ ject of the invention to provide a directed flow, thin layer reaction process that does not involve a molten glass bath of significant depth, does not require con- vection currents to achieve accelerated melting rates and does not require a large furnace. It is an additional objective of the invention that the process requires sub¬ stantially less fuel to be burned in the furnace and as much of the heat so produced be utilized as is practical. Summary of the Invention Preheated or preheated-prereacted discrete bodies of glass "batch" are charged onto a refractory hearth which is heated to a temperature substantially above the temperature at which the glass product becomes fluid; the structure of the hearth and the reaction conditions there¬ in are such that the molten, reacting material flows away from the breakdown area in a thin layer. The flowing glass reacts further and flows off the hearth as product. The raw materials are blended and then agglomerated to overcome many of the problems associated with the use of loose batch materials. Blending establishes chemical homogeneity of the batch, while agglomerating assures that homogeneity is maintained throughout the process. The agglomerating procedure also compresses or compacts the batch materials with the resultant discrete bodies having increased density and heat conductivity. These effects lead to more efficient: utilization of heat when the dis¬ crete bodies are heated before charging to the hearth. They can be simply heated to a temperature several hundred degrees below the temperature at which there is surface sticking; or they can be heated to a temperature just below the surface sticking temperature, inducing a signi¬ ficant amount of solid state prereaction, the amount of said prereaction being dependent on the time the bodies are at the temperature. Heating the discrete bodies should not induce surface melting resulting in sticking. The preheated discrete bodies are introduced onto the hearth and at least partially melted in the breakdown area, at a temperature considerably above that which causes the product glass to be a fluid. The breakdown ^SΫ-E OMH ,/ - " WYΠIPP area is not continuously covered. Those portions of the hearth that are not covered will be heated by direct flame radiation and reradiation from the sidewalls and crown. With the hearth being heated in this manner, the discrete bodies are heated by direct flame radiation, reradiation and conduction from the hearth. The discrete bodies heat uniformly, form a liquid phase and lose their morphology. The liquid phase wets any solid unreacted or unmelted materials, usually silica, that remain, and as the liquid flows away from the breakdown zone these solids are car¬ ried with them, thereby maintaining the homogeneity re¬ quired by our process. As the reacting material flows into and through the melt-reaction zone, it becomes more completely reacted and transparent to radiant energy. Heat transfer to the refractory hearth is efficient and the area may be com¬ pletely covered with a viscous layer of glass. The tem¬ perature in this zone may be lower than in the breakdown area. This area of the hearth is of ^ sufficient length to allow completely reacted glass to be drawn from the furnace " . The time required for the complete fusion reac¬ tion on the hearth is only a fraction of the time required in a conventional molten-bath glass furnace, i.e., minutes vs. hours. The advantages and improvements realized by prac¬ ticing the glass-making process of our invention are substantial. The preheating or prereacting of the ag¬ glomerated discrete bodies allows waste heat streams to be utilized; the combustion gases from the furnace can pro- vide most or all of the heat required. The homogeneity and quick melting of the preheated briquettes allow very high production rates to be realized from our relatively small energy-efficient furnace. The directed flow thin " layer does not require convection currents induced by thermal gradients so that the hearth structure can be ef¬ fectively insulated, accruing further fuel savings. The OM directed flow hearth also leads to savings on refractory cost. The total size of the production facility is dras- ' * tically reduced since the hearth size is very small. In addition the refractory material exposed to extreme heat • 7 5 and very corrosive incompletely reacted molten soda ash is very limited, with resultant further savings in replace¬ ment refractories and the labor required for rebuilding. Probably the most important advantage realized from the process of our invention is superior process control over 10 every aspect of the production of molten glass. Composi¬ tion and homogeneity of the batch are controlled and main¬ tained by blending and briquetting said batch. The uni¬ form briquettes can be characterized mathematically for reaction and heating rates. The preheating and/or pre- 15 reaction of the briquettes are controlled by time of heating and the temperature of the gas employed. ' The melting or reaction rate is controllable by the extent of preheating and firing temperatures. All of these condi¬ tions can be controlled by state-of-the-art microprocessor 20 systems. Prior-art regenerative glass-making furnaces cannot be controlled as effectively. Other advantages, advances in the art, and capital savings will become ap¬ parent in the full description of the invention and in the examples. 25 The Invention The first steps in the process of our invention comprise mixing and agglom rati g the raw material "batch" in some fashion. Said "batch" may contain numerous com¬ ponents of fine particle size if an insoluble glass is the 30 product, or may be a simple two-component system if a soluble silicate is the product. The insoluble glasses may be, for example, soda lime, borosilicate, alumino- silicate or lead glasses. Raw materials commonly used in glassmaking include lime, soda ash, sand, silica flour, 35 borax, feldspar, nepheline syenite, magnesium carbonate. OMP potassium carbonate, iron oxide, dolomite, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, potash, fluorspar, barium carbonate, limestone, alumina, salt cake (sodium sulfate) , gypsum and other equivalent materials. Essentially any material that is needed in making glasses including glass network formers, modifiers and intermediate glass formers can be advantageously processed by the method of our invention. Glass network formers are those materials that form the backbone structure of the glass and exhibit cation-to-oxygen bond strengths greater than 80 kcal/mol. Examples of these materials include, among others: Si0 2 Sb 2 0 3 B 2°3 Sb 2°5 fTV. P 2 0 5 l 1 2 0 3 (coordination P-O, number of Al is 4) Modifiers are those glassjnaking ingredients which do not form networks, but interrupt the structure and change the properties of the product. Examples of these materials include, among others, Na 2 0, κ 2 0 ' Li 2 0, Rb-,0, Sn0 2 , Pb0 2 , MgO, PbO, BaO and CaO. Intermediate materials are those materials that have some network forming capacity or may act as modifiers depending on conditions including the other ingredients, coordination number and the like. Examples include, among others, (VI) TιO_, ZnO, PbO, Al 2 ° 3 (coordination number of 6) and ZrO Our raw materials then must contain at least one ingredient that has a cation-to-oxygen bond strength of 80 kcal/mol and whacever modifiers and/or intermediate compounds are required to produce the desired product glass. Glasses and their preparation are dis¬ cussed in various publications including: Boyd and Thompson, "Glass," Encyclopedia cf Chemical Technology, 3rd Edition, Wiley-Interscience (New York: 1980), Volume ii, pp. 807-855; Pye, Stevens and LaCo rse, Eds., Intro- duction to Glass Science, Plenum Press (New York: 1972) ; ow and Tooley, Ed., The Handbook- of Glass Manufacture, Books for Industry, Inc. (New York: 1974). These publications are incorporated herein by reference as disclosing glasses that can be prepared according to the teachings of our invention, their raw materials and compositions. Another raw material that can be used in the pro¬ cess of our invention is cullet. Many glasses require the inclusion of cullet or previously fused glass to provide processing advantages. Up to about 60% or more cullet can be accommodated in our process, and this material can be added in several ways. The cullet can be ground and added to the "batch" before blending and agglomerating. The discrete bodies of cullet can be mixed with discrete bodies of "batch" and preheated before introduction to the hearth. Discrete bodies of cullet can also be added to the hearth in a separate feed system that can be pre¬ heated. They can also be added wihout heating. Soluble alkali metal silicate glasses are formed b the fusion of a source of alkali metal and silica, usually n alkali metal carbonate and sand. For example, sodium silicate is usually formed by fusing sand and soda ash. The composition of such glasses is given by the mole ratio of Si0 2 /M_0 wherein M represents an alkali metal, usually sodium and/or potassium. Such glasses that con- tain 0.9 to 5.0 moles of Si0 2 per mole of M 2 0 are pre¬ pared by the process of our invention. We prefer to pre¬ pare glasses that contain 1.5 to 4.5 moles of Si0 2 per mole of M„0. Even the simplest of these raw material "batches" consists of materials of different particle size and density. A number of processing problems have been associated with these physical characteristics in the past. Some of the ingredients can be entrained in the combustion gases resulting in plugging and/or eroding various furnace structures. Most importantly, . homogeneity has been very difficult to maintain throughout batch pre¬ paration and the reaction. As a result of this diffi¬ culty, high fusion temperatures and/or long melting and refining steps are necessary to provide good product. Accordingly, the characteristics of loose "batch" com¬ pletely prevent its use in our process. Our process requires that the "batch" materials be blended to provide a homogeneous mixture. This mixture must be agglomerated to fix and maintain homogeneity .and to provide other properties. In our p " rocess agglomerating is not considered to be the mere consolidation of small particles to form larger particles. We intend that ag¬ glomerating be construed to mean any method of forming the "batch" into compacted discrete bodies of uniform and en- during composition, size, shape and density. Such dis¬ crete bodies have uniform properties which can be mathe¬ matically described, such as pressure drop in a column of the bodies, mass flow rate, and * convective and radiation heat transfer characteristics. These uniform properties and their mathematical description allow design of an extremely energy-efficient system. We consider agglomera¬ ting to include extruding, pelletizing, abletting, bri- quetting, forming sheets or ribbons to be cut or broken, and similar processes. The production and processing of briquettes appear to be very convenient, and we prefer to prepare and use pillow-shaped briquettes. Such briquettes have exhibited good handling characteristics, and colunns of said bri¬ quettes exhibit acceptable pressure drops to flowing gas streams. Our briquetting step is carried out by mixing the raw material "batch," which is then blended with a liquid binder, and compacting the mixture in a suitable mold using sufficient pressure to provide a cohesive structure. The binder can be any liquid that provides or induces tackiness to the "batch" without adding undesir¬ able matter to the product. A solution of any soluble glassmaking component is generally suitable, as are oils and the like which burn off completely during fusion. Examples of useful binders include water, alkali metal hydroxide solutions, alkali metal carbonate solutions and alkali metal silicate solutions. The amount of binder required varies with the "batch" composition, the pressure used during compaction, the density and strength desired, and the binder being used. _ For discrete bodies being used in our process 3 to 18 parts by weight (pbw) of binder can be used for 100 pbw of batch. The pressure used to produce the discrete bodies required by the process of our invention depends upon the type of agglomerating process and compositional variables. The minimum pressure required is that which forms discrete bodies with sufficient strength to be handled. This pressure should not be so intense that the discrete bodies exhibit "rebound"—splitting from being compressed too strongly. This mixture can be compressed or compacted at 500 to 30,000 psi to form the discrete bodies required by our process. In any case, the bodies must have sufficient strength to be handled, or a com- pressive strength above about 20 psi for small bodies of about 25 g. Larger bodies of 85 to 90 g should have com- pressive strengths above about 90 psi. 'The discrete bodies should be free-flowing and stable; they can be used at once or stored and used at some later time. We prefer to use briquettes made in a roll bricuetter, the roll separating pressure being about 500 to 3000 psi and the actual forming pressure being 1000 to 10,000 psi. In our process the "briquetted" batch is charged to a preheater which is positioned over a portion of the directed flow hearth. The preheater could be located elsewhere and the briquettes transferred to the hearth by a conveyor or the like, but there are structural and pro- cessing advantages to our preferred position. The pre¬ heater is built of heat- and abrasion-resistant materials OMPI_ to contain a column of briquettes and to provide a counter-current flow of a gas at elevated temperatures through said briquette column. The temperature of the gas and the residence time in the column should not induce surface melting and sticking of the briquette pile. The briquettes can be heated to a temperature at which there is surface sticking, with the briquettes being charged to the hearth when they attain the desired temperature. Alternatively, the briquettes can be heated up to a tem- perature 50 to 100°F below the temperature at which there is surface sticking and then held at that tempera¬ ture for a period of time sufficient to achieve up to 60% reaction of the raw materials. In some glasses the reac¬ tion can be carried out completely without deforming the briquette. The gas used to provide this elevated tempera¬ ture is usually 50 to 200 F below the temperature at which -there is surface sticking. The high temperature gas can be from any source, but a preferred source would be the combustion products from the furnace, which are con- venient and provide economic advantage. The preheater and/or prereactor must have several characteristics to be useful in our process. The bri¬ quettes must be discharged freely from the preheater and fall randomly onto the directed flow 'hearth, but this must be accomplished without exposure of the heated portion of the ' briquette pile to radiant energy from the hearth. Additional heat extracted from this radiation can cause surface fusion among these briquettes. The size of the preheater should be sufficient to allow the briquette depth to be adjusted to extract all the usable heat from the hot gases that enter the briquette column. However, the temperature of the preheater off-gases should not be reduced below the dew point of the combustion products. The directed flow, thin layer hearth must include several structural and operational features to be used in our process. The hearth must incorporate means to direct the flow of at least partially melted briquettes from the initial portion of the hearth that we call the breakdown zone, through the melt-reaction zone to the discharge port. The most common means of directing said flow is to slope the hearth downward from the briquette receiving area to the discharge port. A mechanical pusher, among other devices, can also be useful in achieving the desired flow. While the velocity of said directed flow is in¬ fluenced by a number of factors, it must be sufficient to entrain any unmelted, unreacted solids. If such materials are not entrained, homogeneity is not maintained and the desired product glass is not produced. In addition, the unreacted solids would build up and disrupt the flow on the hearth. There are two zones in the directed-flow hearth as employed in our process. The initial briquette breakdown zone and the subsequent melt-reaction zone need not be physically separated, although each has specific requirements. Both zones of the hearth may be heated in the same way, and any convenient means may be employed to do so. As an example, side or crown-fired oil or gas burners may be used. The conditions maintained within the briquette breakdown zone, which comprises 10 to 80% of the hearth area, must be maintained to promote rapid heating and at least partial melting of the freshly charged briquettes. To achieve rapid heating and loss of morphology, direct heating of the refractory hearth is necessary, since heat transfer from the hot refractories to the briquettes is efficient. The briquettes and partially unreacted batch materials are opaque to radiation and do not transmit heat to the hearth; therefore it is necessary that part of the refractory hearth be free of heat-absorbing materials and able to absorb radiant energy from the combustion of fuel and reradiation from the furnace and hearth super¬ structure. Accordingly, the briquettes should be randomly O PI charged to the hearth and should not form piles. A dis¬ continuous layer of single briquettes covering 40 to 90% of the breakdown zone is preferred. About 10 to 60% of the area of the breakdown zone should be free of the bri- quettes and available to absorb radiant energy at all times during charging of the hearth. The briquette feed rate and pattern should be adjusted to achieve this result. The temperature in the breakdown zone is con¬ trolled at 600 to 1000°F above the temperature required to produce a fluid, flowing product glass thereby pro¬ moting the required rapid heating and partial melting of the briquettes. The briquettes should lose their mor¬ phology in less than about 15 minutes. The partially melted, partially reacted material flows from the breakdown zone to the melt-reaction zone which comprises 20 to 90% of the hearth area. This zone may be heated at the same temperature as the breakdown zone or the temperature may be 400 to 600 F abovea the temperature required to produce a fluid, flowing product glass. The refractory hearth can be completely covered with the flowing molten glass, since in this state it is transparent to radiation and the refractories are heated by radiation through the glass. In this area, melting and reaction of the raw materials to form the product glass are completed or largely completed. The homogeneity maintained throughout the reaction allows some molten glasses to be drawn from this zone as product without refining. Glasses that require long reaction times and/or special refining can be drawn into a holding tank for that period. Each glass prepared by our process requires modifi¬ cation of temperatures, size of various areas of the fur¬ nace and other reaction conditions. In spite of these differences it is possible to describe the events of the process. The briquette is prepared from the mixed and blended raw material "batch" and then charged to the pre¬ heater. The gas rising through the briquette pile heats and dries the briquette. As the briquette progresses down the column it contacts progressively hotter gases and absorbs heat uniformly throughout the compacted material. At the bottom of the column the briquette comes in contact with the highest temperature gases, and it is in this region that the majority of the solid-state prereaction takes place. The preheated or prereacted briquette is charged to the high-temperature breakdown zone of the fur¬ nace, and the resultant liquid phase wets any residual unreacted solids and as the material flows from the break¬ down zone to the melt-reaction zone these solids are entrained. There is no buildup of unreacted materials in the breakdown zone. In the melt-reaction zone, further reaction and dissolution of the remaining solids takes place to form the molten glass desired. If the product requires no refining it can be drawn directly from the hearth. A most important result of carrying out the glass fusion process according to the method of our invention is that the opportunities for efficient heat transfer to the glass-making ingredients are greatly increased. In a con¬ ventional glass furnace or "glass tank," heat transfer and utilization are adversely affected by many factors such as the insulating nature of the batch, the low surface-to- volume ratio of the molten glass bath as well as the unreacted batch, the need to heat and maintain massive amounts of refractories and operation in a noπ-steady- state condition required by reversal of flame direction to use the heat recovered by the regenerators. In contrast, the process of our invention is a sceady-state operation that can be controlled to produce advantageous results. The briquetted "batch" has a predetermined and predictable pressure drop for the hot gas flowing up the column and has a favorable area-to-volume ratio for absorbing heat IPO from the gas when compared with a pile of loose "batch" which exhibits neither of these qualities. In addition, the briquettes heat uniformly before any reaction takes place, while in loose batch a relatively thin surface zone absorbs heat and undergoes reaction before further heat transfer is possible. In the breakdown zone the bri¬ quettes absorb heat from the heated refractories as well as the hot gaseous products of combustion. In conven¬ tional glass furnaces the batch or partially reacted batch has virtually no opportunity to absorb heat by conduction from the refractories. The thin layer of flowing molten material in the melt-reaction zone also has a favorable surface-to-volume ratio when compared to a deep molten bath. Additionally, this layer is transparent to radiant energy so that the refractories on which the glass flows are heated, and heat transfer from the refractories aug¬ ments that from the hot combustion gases. The depth of the molten glass layer flowing in the melt-reaction zone is dependent upon several factors. It must be thin enough to allow efficient radiant energy transfer to the refrac¬ tories while thick enough to allow substantial production rates. The most detailed description of our invention is in terms of the process required to produce a soluble sodium silicate glass, but it should be understood that while reaction conditions may vary for different types of glasses the main process steps and results are the same for all such preparations. The raw materials used to prepare soluble sodium silicate glass are commonly sodium carbonate and sand. These raw materials, which are of small particle size, are combined in amounts that provide 0.9 to 4.5 moles of SiO per mole of a 0. The raw materials are weighed to provide the correct compositions and blended in any convenient manner such as by a twin shell, zig-zag or tur¬ bine blender. The blend of raw materials is mixed with an aqueous binder. A sodium silicate solution that contains 1.0 to 35% by weight of silicate solids ( a 2 0 + Si0 2 ) is useful for this purpose. We prefer that the silicate solution contain 1.5 to 10% silicate solids. Sufficient binder is used to provide a mixture that contains 1.0 to 12% water and up to 5% silicate solids. The amount and composition of the binder can be varied considerably as long as the resulting briquettes have sufficient initial strength to be handled. We prefer the mixture to contain 3.5 to 9% water and 0 to 2% silicate solids. The dampened mixture is compressed in a roll briquetter at roll separa¬ ting pressures between 500 and 1200 psi to provide the desired briquettes. These roll pressures translate to about 2000 to 5000 psi of actual forming pressure in the mold cavities. The material should be compressed within 3 minutes after the dampened mixture is prepared. If more than 3 minutes elapse, the strength of the briquettes is substantially diminished. We prefer to compress the dam¬ pened batch immediately (less than about 1.5 min) to ob- tain acceptable strength with minimum binder addition. The compressed material is screened, with the undersize material being recycled. The product briquettes are free-flowing and can be handled with the usual type of conveying equipment. They can be stored, shipped to other locations or used at once. To be used, the briquettes are charged to a preheater which is preferably positioned over and feeds the briquette breakdown area of the hearth. The preheater for the briquettes is constructed of super-duty firebrick or similar structural material and is essen- tially a container for a column of briquettes which pro¬ gressively advances from the top of the structure to the bottom. A stream of high-temperature gas, usually diluted products of combustion, is passed counter-current to the briquette flow, thereby heating the briquettes. While we prefer to use the waste gases from the combustion of fuel used to heat the furnace, this gas cannot be drawn direct¬ ly from the furnace because the temperature would be too high and surface melting of the briquettes would result. Instead, the furnace gases are reduced in temperature by preheating the combustion air, and/or diluting to the desired temperature with ambient air. The temperature of the gas directed into the briquette column and used to heat the briquettes varies with the composition of the glass produced, but should be slightly below the tempera- ture that produces surface sticking. For the soluble silicate glasses of the present description this tempera¬ ture is about 1300 to 1550 F. Other glasses have dif¬ ferent requirements, and they are discussed where appropriate. The briquettes are heated to progressively higher temperatures as they move from the top of the column to the bottom. The briquettes can be heated to any temperature required for the process as long as it is below the point of surface sticking. Good results can be obtained by heating the briquettes to a temperature 50 to -900°F below the temperature that produces surface sticking. We prefer to heat briquettes for soluble glass production to temperatures between 850 and 1550°F. If the briquettes remain in the preheater for only enough time to attain the desired temperature, little solid state prereaction is achieved. However, if the briquettes are retained in the preheater longer, more solid state reac¬ tion takes place. Soluble glasses can be held for up to 5 hours at about 1350 to 1550°F to achieve a prereaction of 35% or higher. The preheated or prereacted briquettes are charged to the breakdown area of the hearth which is fired at 2200 to 2700 F. The briquettes fall on the refractory hearth, are heated by absorbing radiation from the com¬ bustion of fuel, reradiation from the refractory super- structure, and by conduction from the refractory hearth, and begin to melt almost immediately. Morphology is lost OMH in 3 minutes or less, and the molten portion begins to flow. The hearth is sloped downward from the breakdown _ zone. As the molten material flows, it wets and entrains any unreacted silica so that homogeneity is maintained. ■ 5 This silica reacts as the flow progresses and the melt becomes more transparent to radiation, allowing the re¬ fractory hearth to continue receiving radiated heat. As the material flows, any remaining silica reacts and the desired product is formed. The total time from charging 10 of the preheated briquettes to the hearth and drawing the molten glass depends upon glass composition, temperature of briquette preheating, temperature of the hearth, and slope of the hearth. This time must be sufficient for at least 98% of the raw materials (especially silica) in the 15 composition to be reacted. We have found that this period can be less than about 30 minutes for silica-rich glass (more than 2.5 moles of Si0 2 per mole of Na_0) and less than about 20 min for more " alkaline glasses. ' Some compositions require less than 15 min while others may 20 require less than 10 min. The depth of the flowing glass layer depends upon a number of factors such as the temperature and composition of the flowing glass, the slope of the hearth and the pro¬ duction rate. v. The molten product depth varies up to about 25 2.0 inches. Production of insoluble glasses requires some changes in the detailed process used to produce soluble sodium silicate. Batching, blending and the binder must be adjusted to provide for more numerous ingredients, for 30 example, a soda-lime glass used for windows requires four ingredients while a borosilicate glass used for laboratory ware requires 9 ingredients. Blending must be controlled so that mixing is complete but so that demixing does not occur. The binder solution can be water or silicate solu- 35 tion, and for such insoluble glasses we prefer that the dampened mixture contain 3 to 10% water and up to 3% sili¬ cate solids. The dampened batch should be compressed and bri¬ quetted within about 5 minutes and the roll separating pressures should correspond to actual forming pressures of 2000 to 6000 psi. The briquettes are charged to the preheater and heated with gases that are somewhat higher in temperature than for soluble silicate production since surface sticking is induced at somewhat higher temperatures. The gas can have a temperature up to 1700°F and briquettes can be 850 to 1650°F on charging. The temperatures that can be used in the hearth are the same as those required for the soluble glasses. These insoluble silicate glasses are relatively richer in silica and require up to 45 minutes in the hearth between charging of the briquettes and drawing the product. Glasses that require a considerable amount of refining can be processed on a longer hearth or more conveniently placed in a heated holding tank. Even this refining time is reduced from the prior art since the melt is -inherently homogeneous. Examples of insoluble glasses that can be- processed according to the teachings of our invention in¬ clude among others: Soda-Lime or Lead Oxide Glasses Windows Light Bulbs Oxide (% wt/wt) Oxide (% wt/wt) sio 2 68 - 78 sio 2 65 - 80 A1 2 0 3 0.2 - 3 1 2 0 3 0 - 2 CaO 6 - 16 CaO 0 - 6 MgO 0 - 5 MgO 0 - 6 Na 2 0 10 - 20 PbO 0 - 9 BaO 0 - 9 Na 2 0 0 - 20 2 o 0 - 22 O Borosilicate Glasses Heat Resistant Laboratory Ware Oxides (% wt/wt) Oxide (% wt/wt) sio 2 70 - 82 sio 2 63 - 83 1 Λ 0.5 - 4 A1 2 0 3 1 - 5.5 CaO 0 - 7.5 CaO 0.1 - 10 MgO 0 - 1 MgO 0.1 - 4 Na 2 0 4 - 17 ZnO 0 - 13 B 2°3 1 - 20 B 2°3 6 - 14 AS 2 0 3 0 - 4 Na 2 0 2.5 - 13 κ 2 o 0.5 - 10 As 2 0 5 0 - 1 While the main elements of our process are always the same, certain embodiments of our invention require that the reaction conditions be established differently. For example, the combustion gases must be treated dif¬ ferently if a substantially prereacted briquette is to be charged to the hearth rather than a simply preheated briquette. The following* steps would be required if only preheated briquettes were desired. Combustion gases would be pulled from the furnace at about the furnace temperature. These gases might be diluted before enter¬ ing, but generally enter directly, a metallic recuperator for preheating the combustion air. If desired, a con- ventional regenerator can be used as well. The off-gases from the recuperator are then used to heat the briquettes. If a significant amount of prereaction is desired, the sequence of steps is somewhat different. The combus¬ tion products are drawn from the furnace and diluted to provide the mass of high-temperature gas required to prereact the briquettes. This hot gas is drawn through the briquettes to heat and prereact them, and it exits the briquette column at a still high temperature (only 300 to 400 F less than the entering gas) and is passed through a large heat exchanger to heat the combustion air. OMP The soluble silicate glasses obtained from the pro¬ cess of our invention are comparable in all respects to commercially available glass prepared in the traditional manner. Insoluble glasses prepared by our process are also comparable to commercially available material. Examples The following examples illustrate certain embodi¬ ments of our invention. Illustrations of conventional preparations are also included to provide comparisons. We do not consider that these examples illustrate the full scope of our invention, said scope being fully discussed in the disclosure and recited in the claims. All propor¬ tions are by weight, such as percent by weight (%), unless otherwise indicated. Example 1 This example illustrates the production of sodium silicate glass * (2.40 Si0 2 /Na 2 0) by the prior-art method. A furnace with a bath area of 375 ft 2 (34.8 m ) was charged with 59 batches of sand and soda ash per 8-hour shift. Each batch contained 820 lb (372 kg) of sand and 575 lb (260 kg) of soda ash. The crown temperature was about 2500 F or 1370 C. When the glass was drawn, white lumps were seen in the molten glass stream. These lumps were found to consist of un- reacted sand and/or glass of very high SiO_/Na_0 ratio and were insoluble. The furnace output for this operation 2 2 was measured at 24.5 lb/ft /hour (119 kg/ /hour). The energy requirement was 2850 BTU/lb (1307 cal/kg) of glass. The residence time in the furnace was about 12 hours. Example 2 The example illustrates the preparation of a soluble silicate glass (3.22 Si0 2 /Na 2 0) by a prelimi¬ nary and primitive embodiment of our invention. While this example demonstrates the concepts and the process steps of our invention, equipment limitations did not al¬ low full realization of all the advantages that are in¬ herent in our process when more refined equipment is used. Raw material batches of 100 lb of sand and 54.7 lb 3 of soda ash were blended for 3 minutes in a 6 ft paddle mixer. The batch was fed to a pug mill wherein it was mixed with sufficient dilute silicate solution to provide a damp mixture containing 7% water and 0.14% sodium sili- cate solids. After thorough mixing, the dampened material was fed to a omark-Greaves roll briquetter .within 3 min¬ utes of addition of the silicate solution. The briquettes were compressed at 1750 lb roll separation pressure. This provides pillow-shaped structures measuring approximately 1.75 in. by 1.44 in. by 0.88 in. The briquettes were screened (SWECO vibrating screen) to exclude any materials smaller than about 0.50 in. The undersize material was recycled to the pug mill. The briquettes, were free- flowing and had a co pressive strength of about 22 lb/in 2 . The briquettes were charged to a preheater by means that minimized the entrance of air with the briquettes. The preheater was about 6 ft tall with inside dimensions of 2 ft by 1 ft and was constructed of super-duty fire- brick or equivalent castable refractory material. The discharge area or throat of the preheater was designed so that the toe of the briquette column was exposed to a minimum amount of energy radiating from the furnace. The briquettes were heated by forcing hot gases through the briquette pile. Discharging was accomplished by a push rod or other means of forcing the briquettes off the bottom of the preheater and into the throat of the pre¬ heater, from which they fell to the hearth. The hearth was 127 in. in length with a width of 6 in. except for the briquette breakdown zone. This area, which was directly under the preheater throat, was 24 in. in length by 20 in. in width. The hearth narrowed from the 20-in. width of the breakdown zone to the 6-in. width of the melt-reaction zone within 8 in. so that the melt- reaction zone was 95 in. by 6 in. The hearth was sloped at 0.05 in. per inch for the first 100 in., including the breakdown zone. The last 27 in. of the hearth had no slope. This slope and configuration of the hearth were completely satisfactory, and the molten and. mostly molten material flowed from the breakdown area to the discharge end without problem. The hearth was fired with various combinations of gas-fired burners through the side wall to obtain the tem¬ peratures desired. Thermocouples and sampling ports were placed in various locations in the preheater and over the hearth, and a viewing port was placed at the discharge end of the furnace. The briquettes were charged into the preheater, and diluted -counter-flowing furnace gases were used to heat them. The briquettes were charged at various rates de- pending upon the pull rates of product glass desired. The briquettes were heated, and conditions were such that they had a residence time of 2-1/2 hours at temperatures of about 1100 to 1350 F. At these temperatures there was 3 to 5% prereaction of the silica prior to discharging. The furnace was fired at about 2600°F. The bri¬ quettes fell in a random manner onto the briquette break¬ down zone. No piles of briquettes were observed at pull rates less than 334 Ib/hr. Sufficient area of the hearth was uncovered to receive radiation, and the briquettes lost their morphology and flowed from the zone within 3 minutes. A continuous layer of molten material covered the 6-in.-wide melt-reaction zone. This layer was pro¬ portional, to the calculated pull rate, being 0.40 in. at 129 Ib/hr, 0.44 in. at 188 Ib/hr, determined by placing a tracer in the molten glass and observing it upon drawing the product. The total residence time on the hearth was about 13- minutes. The product glass discharged at tem¬ peratures between 2170°F and 2225°F. Actual pull rates of 116 to 334 lb/hr were achieved using this equip¬ ment, so that production of 3.22 Si0 2 /Na 2 0 glass of commercial quality was 14.5 to 42 lb/ft hr. While these rates do not entirely indicate vastly improved pro¬ duction rates over the prior-art results as illustrated in Example 1, they are encouraging because of the primitive nature of the equipment used. Example 3 An insoluble soda-lime glass batch was processed in the same manner as described in Example 2. The composi¬ tion of this material was as follows: Sand 100.0 lb Soda Ash 32.0 Dolomite 24.0 Nepheline Syenite 4.0 Sodium Sulfate 0.6 The glass product was discharged from the hearth at an average steady-state rate of 189 lb/hr for 4 hours. Example 4 A computer simulation of the glass-making process of our invention was carried out for a soluble sodium silicate glass. The sand and soda ash batch was designed to produce glass of 1.8 or 2.0 moles of Si0 2 per mole of Na 2 0 and the briquetting was done as described in Example 2. The briquettes were charged to a double-sided preheater, each side of which is 2 ft x 2 ft and contains a uniform packed column of briquettes. The briquettes rest on the refractory bottom of the preheater structure with the toe of the column forming a 35 angle in facing the preheater throat. Hydraulic pushers force the bri¬ quettes into the preheater throat, and they fall by gra¬ vity onto the directed-flow hearth. The strokes of the OMFI ^ ° hydraulic pushers alternate between the two sides of the preheater, helping to achieve the uniform, but discon¬ tinuous, layer of briquettes required in the briquette breakdown area which is the first 4 ft of the 12-ft hearth. The hearth is 100 ft with a slope of 2 from the breakdown area to the draw hole. The preheater throat is 2 ft inside the end wall of the hearth so that the bri¬ quettes do not contact the refractories as they fall to the hearth. Firing is carried out using natural gas burners positioned in the end wall at the charging end; the temperature of the combustion products is 2500 F. The product glass is drawn from the hearth at 4000 lbs/hr at 2000°F. The products of combustion are drawn from the discharge end of the hearth at 2500°F and directed through a metallic recuperator so that some heat can be used to preheat the combustion air to the burner. The combustion air is heated to about 1000 F. The hot off- gases from the metallic recuperator are further diluted to 1500 4^50°F with ambient air. This hot gas stream is passed through the briquette columns, and the briquettes heated to about 1450 F before charging them -to the hearth. The briquettes require 30 min to pass through the preheater. The passage through the hearth requires about 10 minutes. After completing the computer simulation, it was found that production of the product requires about 1300 BTϋ/lb of glass. The computer model is based on a completely reacted glass with no insolubles. Example 5 The experiment illustrated in this example first indicated that unreacted silica relics of the briquettes are wetted by the liquid phase that forms upon loss of morphology by the briquettes. Briquettes of sand and soda ash with 3.22 pbw of Si0 per pbw of .Na 2 0 were pre¬ pared as described in Example 2. These briquettes were heated in a flow of 1600°F gas to between 1450 and 1500°F in about 1 hr. This temperature was maintained for 2 hours. The briquettes were placed in a furnace at 2300°F. In 3.5 min the briquettes had lost their mor¬ phology and were removed from the furnace and allowed to cool. Upon fracturing the glass, it was found that the unreacted relics were separated by and completely sur¬ rounded by glass. This structure, a matrix of glass with sand, indicated that the unreacted material is wetted by the molten glass. Example 6 This example also illustrates that the unreacted material is wetted by the melted liquid phase and that such wetted material flows with the liquid phase. Briquettes of sand and soda ash containing 2.5 pbw of s i° 2 per Pk w °f Na 2° were prepared as described in Example 2 and preheated as described in Example 5. The briquettes were then placed in a furnace in such a manner that the liquids formed would flow. The briquettes were observed to glow and the surfaces to boil and bubble because of degassing. Within 3 min the briquettes col¬ lapsed (lost morphology) and the newly formed liquid flowed away. Upon cooling the furnace, no deposits of unreacted sand were found where the briquettes had been placed, indicating that the unreacted material had been carried away in the liquid phase.

Claims: Claims We claim: 1. A directed flow, thin layer glass fusion pro¬ cess comprising the steps of: (a) blending particulate glass aking raw materials to form a homogeneous mixture, at least one of said raw materials having a cation-to-oxygen bond strength greater than 80 kcal/mole; (b) forming said mixture into discrete co - pacted bodies of enduring homogeneous character; (c) heating said bodies at a temperature and for a period of time sufficient to raise their temperature significantly while avoiding surface melting or sticking; (d) charging the discrete heated bodies to a breakdown area of a refractory hearth in a furnace, said hearth being heated by a source of radiant energy, said bodies resting upon the refractories comprising the hearth, the temperature within the furnace being suffi- cient to cause the discrete bodies to lose morphology in less than 15 minutes by forming a molten phase, said hearth and breakdown area being so constructed that the molten material forms a thin layer flowing in a direction away from the breakdown area to a melt-reaction area, said molten phase wetting any unmelted unreacted raw material so that it is carried by said flow, thereby maintaining homogeneity; (e) heating the melt-reaction area of the hearth with a source of radiant energy, and maintaining the conditions such that a portion of the radiant energy is transmitted through the flowing molten thin layer to heat the underlying refractory hearth, so that the said thin layer absorbs heat from the hearth refractories in addition to absorbing radiant energy to complete melting and reacting, thereby forming a molten glass; and ' (f) recovering the molten glass by drawing it from the hearth, the period of residence in the hearth < being sufficient to accomplish essentially complete reac¬ tion of the raw materials. 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the glassmaking raw materials are alkali metal carbonate and silica sand in such proportion that the glass formed contains 0.9 to 5.0 moles of Si0 2 per mole of M 2 0 wherein M is an al¬ kali metal. 3. The process of claim 2 wherein the alkali metal carbonate is soda ash and the glass contains 1.5 to 4.5 moles of Si0 2 per mole of a 2 0. 4. The process of any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the raw material mixture is blended with a liquid binder and compressed or compacted at 500 to * 3,000 psi to form discrete bodies. 5. The process of any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the discrete bodies are contacted with gas that is 50 to 200°F below the temperature at which there is surface sticking to raise the temperature of the discrete bodies ttoo 5500 ttoo 660000°FF below the temperature at which there is surface sticking. 6. The process of claim 5 wherein the discrete bodies are maintained at a high temperature for a period sufficient to achieve up to 60% reaction of the raw materials. 7. A directed flow, thin layer glass fusion pro¬ cess comprising the steps of: (a) blending glassmaking particulate raw materials into a homogeneous mixture, at least one of said raw materials being compounds that have a cation-to-oxygen bond strength greater than 8 kcal/mol; (b) blending said homogeneous mixture with 3 to 18 pbw of a liquid binder for each 100 pbw of raw mate¬ rial mixture, thereby forming a dampened mixture; (c) compressing or compacting said dampened mixture at 1000 to 10,000 psi actual forming pressure to form discrete briquettes of enduring homogeneous character; (d) heating the briquettes by contact with a gas at 50 to 200°F below the temperature at which there is surface sticking for a period of time sufficient to raise the briquettes to a temperature 50 to 600°F below the temperature at which there is surface sticking while avoiding surface melting or sticking of the briquettes; (e) charging the discrete heated briquettes to a breakdown zone of a refractory hearth heated by a source of radiant energy to a temperature of 600 to 1000°F above the temperature required to produce a fluid, flowing product glass, said briquettes resting directly upon the refractories forming the hearth and absorbing heat from said refractories by conduction in addition to absorbing radiant energy, so that the bri¬ quettes lose morphology in less than 15 min by forming a molten phase, said hearth and breakdown area being so con¬ structed that the molten material forms a thin layer flow¬ ing away from the breakdown zone to a melt reaction zone, said molten phase wetting any unmelted unreacted raw mate¬ rial so that it is carried by said flow, thereby main¬ taining homogeneity; (f) heating the melt-reaction zone of the hearth with a source of radiant energy and maintaining the conditions such that a portion of the radiant energy is transmitted through the flowing molten thin layer to heat the refractory hearth, so that said thin layer absorbs heat from the hearth refractories and the radiant energy source to complete the melting and reacting, thereby form- ing a molten glass; and IRE OMPI (g) recovering the molten glass by drawing it from the hearth, said recovery being 30.min or less from the time the briquettes were charged to the hearth. 8. The process of claim 7 wherein the glassmaking raw materials are alkali metal carbonate and silica sand in such proportions that the glass formed has 0.9 to 5.0 moles of Si0 2 per mole of M 2 0 wherein M is an alkali metal. 9. The process of claim 8 wherein the alkali metal carbonate is soda ash and the glass formed has 1.5 to 4.5 moles of Si0 2 per mole of Na 2 0. 10. The process of claim 7 wherein the liquid binder is water or an aqueous solution of a raw material. 11. The process of claim 10 wherein the liquid binder is an aqueous solution of an alkali metal hydrox¬ ide, an alkali metal carbonate or an alkali metal silicate. 12. The process of either claim 7 or 9 wherein the temperature to which the briquettes are heated is 50 to 100 F below the temperature at which there is surface sticking, . and they are heated for a sufficient time to achieve up to a 60% reaction of the raw materials. 13. The process of either of claims 7 or 9 wherein the briquette- breakdown zone comprises 10 to 60%- of the hearth area, 10 to 80% of the briquette breakdown zone is maintained free of briquettes, and the melt-reaction zone comprises 20 to 90% of the hearth area and the entire area is covered with a flowing thin layer of molten material. 14. The process of claim 8 wherein the glass formed contains less than 2.5 moles of Si0 2 per mole of M O and the residence time in the hearth is less than 20 minutes. 15. A directed flow, thin layer process for the preparation of soluble alkali metal silicate glass, com- prising the steps of: (a) blending alkali metal carbonate and silica sand to form a homogeneous mixture, the proportions being such that the glass formed has 0.9 to 5.0 moles of Si0 2 per mole of M 2 0 wherein M is an alkali metal; (b) blending said homogeneous mixture with 3 to 18 pbw of water or aqueous solutions of alkali metal hydroxides, alkali metal carbonates or alkali metal sili¬ cates for each 100 pbw of the homogeneous mixture; (c) compressing or compacting said dampened mixture at 100 to 10,000 psi actual forming pressure to form discrete briquettes of enduring homogeneous character; (d) heating the briquettes by contact with a gas at 50 to 200°F below the temperature at which there is surface sticking for a period of time sufficient to raise the briquettes to a temperature 50 to 600°F below the temperature at which there is surface sticking; (e) charging the heated discrete briquettes to the breakdown zone of a refractory hearth heated to a temperature of 600 to 1000°F above the temperature at which a flowing fluid glass product is formed by a source of radiant energy, the charging being controlled so that 10 to 60% of the hearth area of the breakdown zone is maintained free of briquettes, said briquettes resting upon the hearth refractories so that they absorb heat from the refractories in addition to absorbing radiant energy so that the briquettes lose morphology in less than 15 min by forming a molten phase, said hearth and breakdown area being so constructed that the molten material forms a thin O PI layer flowing away from the breakdown zone to a melt reac¬ tion zone, said molten phase wetting any unmelted un- reacted raw material so that it is carried by said flow, thereby maintaining homogeneity; (f) heating the melt-reaction zone that com¬ prises 20 to 90% of the hearth area with a source of radiant energy and maintaining the conditions such that a portion of the radiant energy is transmitted through the flowing molten thin layer to heat the refractory hearth, so that said thin layer absorbs heat from the hearth re¬ fractories and the radiant energy source to complete the melting and reacting, thereby forming a molten glass; and (g) recovering the molten glass by drawing it from the hearth. 16. A directed flow, thin-layer process for pre- •paring sodium silicate glass, comprising the steps of: (a) blending sand and soda ash to form a homogeneous mixture, the proportions being such ' that the glass formed has 0.9 to 5.0 moles of SiO_ per mole of Na 2 0; (b) blending said homogeneous mixture with 3 to 18 pbw of water or aqueous sodium silicate solution for each 100 pbw of the homogeneous' mixture; (c) compressing or compacting said dampened mixture at 1,000 to 10,000 psi actual forming pressure within 3 min of forming the dampened mixture in molds to form discrete briquettes of enduring homogeneous character; (d) heating the briquettes by contact with a gas at a temperature of 1300 to 1550 F for a period of time sufficient to raise the temperature of the briquettes to 840 to 1450°F while avoiding surface melting or sticking of the briquettes; (e) charging the discrete heated briquettes to the breakdown zone of a refractory hearth in a furnace heated to 2200 to 2700°F by a source of radiant energy, the charging being controlled so that 10 to 60% of the hearth area of the breakdown zone is maintained free of briquettes, said briquettes resting upon the hearth re¬ fractories so that they absorb heat from the refractories by conduction in addition to absorbing radiant energy so that the briquettes lose morphology in less than 15 minutes by forming a molten phase, said hearth and breakdown zone being sloped so that the molten material forms a thin layer flowing away from the breakdown zone to a melt-reaction zone, said molten phase wetting any unmelted, unreacted raw material so that it is included in said flow, thereby maintaining homogeneity; (f) heating the melt-reaction zone that com¬ prises 20 to 90% of the hearth area with a source of radi- ant energy and maintaining the conditions such that a por¬ tion of the radiant energy is transmitted through the flowing molten thin layer to heat the underlying refrac¬ tory hearth, so that said thin layer absorbs heat from the hearth refractories by conduction, and -from the radiant energy source to complete the melting and reacting, there¬ by forming a molten glass; and (g) recovering the molten glass by drawing it from the hearth, the time of recovery being less than 30 minutes from the time the briquettes were charged to the hearth. 17. The process of claim 16 wherein the dampened raw material mixture contains 1.0 to 12% water and up to 5% silicate solids derived from the sodium silicate solution. 18. The process of claim 16 wherein the dampened mixture contains 3.5 to 9% water and up to 2% silicate solids from the sodium silicate solution. 19. The process of claim 16 wherein the dampened raw material mixture is compacted using a roll press bri- quetter with 500 to 1200 psi roll separating pressure translating to about 2,000 to 5,000 psi actual forming 5 pressure, said compaction taking place within 1.5 min of preparation of the dampened mixture. 20. The process of claim 16 wherein the radiant energy source is the combustion of natural gas or oil, and the diluted products of this combustion are used to heat 10 the briquettes. 21. The process of claim 16 wherein the bri¬ quettes are heated for a sufficient time to achieve reac¬ tion of up to 60% of the raw materials before charging to the hearth. 15 22. The process of claim 16 wherein_ the bri¬ quettes lose their morphology within 3 minutes. 23. The process of claim 16 wherein the directed flow, thin layer is established by constructing the hearth so that it slopes from the briquette breakdown zone 20 through the melt-reaction zone to the draw port. 24. The process of claim 16 wherein the time between the charging of the briquettes to the hearth and drawing of the glass is less than 15 minutes. 25. The process of claim 24 wherein the time is '* ■ 25 less than 10 minutes. 26. The process of claim 16 wherein the glass formed contains 1.5 to 4.5 moles of s i° 2 P er mol 'e of Na 0. 2 27. The process of claim 16 wherein the glass formed contains less than 2.5 moles of Si0 2 per mole of Na 2 0 and the residence time in the hearth is less than 20 minutes. 28. A directed flow, thin-layer glass fusion pro¬ cess comprising the steps of: (a) blending particulate glassmaking raw materials to form a homogeneous mixture, at least one of said raw materials being a glass network former and having a cation-to-oxygen bond strength greater than 80 kcal/mol, the remaining raw materials being modifiers and intermediates; (b) forming said mixture into briquettes of enduring homogeneous character; (c) heating said briquettes at a temperature and for a period of time sufficient to raise their tem¬ perature significantly while avoiding surface melting or sticking; (d) charging the heated ' briquettes to a breakdown area of a refractory hearth in a furnace, said hearth being heated by a Source of radiant energy, said bodies resting upon the refractories comprising the hearth, the temperature within the furnace being suf¬ ficient to cause the briquettes to lose morphology in less than 15 minutes by forming a molten phase, said hearth and breakdown area being so constructed that the molten mate¬ rial forms a thin layer flowing in a direction away from the breakdown area to a melt-reaction area, said molten phase wetting any unmelted unreacted raw material so that it is carried by said flow, thereby maintaining homogeneity; (e) heating the melt-reaction area of the hearth with a source of radiant energy, and ' maintaining the conditions such that a portion of the radiant energy is transmitted through the flowing molten thin layer to ' GRE O F heat the underlying refractory hearth, so that the said thin layer absorbs heat from the hearth refractories in addition to absorbing radiant energy to complete melting and reacting, thereby forming a molten glass; and (f) recovering the molten glass by drawing it from the hearth, the period of residence in the hearth being sufficient to accomplish essentially complete reac¬ tion of the raw materials. 29. The process of claim 28 wherein the glass network former can be: B 2°3 Sb 2 0 5 P 2°5 P 2°3 or mixtures thereof; the modifiers being Na 2 0, κ 2 0 ' Li 2 0, Rb 2 0, Sn0 2 , -Pb0 2 r MgO, PbO, BaO and CaO, and the intermediates being τ i° 2 ' ZnO, PbO, Al;, 0 3 and ZrO 30. The process of either of claims 28 or 29 wherein the raw material is mixed with sufficient binder to provide a dampened mixture containing 3 to 5% water and up to 3% silicate solids and compacted at 2000 to 3000 psi to form briquettes; 31. The process of either of claims 29 or 30 wherein the briquettes are heated in step (c) with a gas at a temperature up to 1700 F for a period sufficient to heat said briquettes to 840 - 1650°F; OMP 32. The process of either claim 29 or 30 wherein the briquette breakdown zone is heated at 2200 to 2700°F and the charging of said briquettes being controlled to maintain 10 to 60% of the zone free of briquettes. 33. The process of either of claims 29 or 30 wherein the molten glass product is drawn into a heated refining tank.

Inventors: ALEXANDER JOHN M, BAUER WILLIAM C, PATTENGILL MAURICE G
Applicants: ALEXANDER JOHN M, BAUER WILLIAM C, PATTENGILL MAURICE G, PQ CORP
Application year: 1982
Main classification: C03B5
IPC codes: C03B1, C03B3, C03B5, C03C1