HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF COMBATING UNDESIRED PLANT GROWTH

Abstract: A herbicidal composition which comprises 3-(3-methyl-4-­ isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea together with at least one compound selected from: (i) a compound which has the general formula or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which each of X¹ and X² inde­ pendently represents an iodine, bromine or chlorine atom; (ii) a compound which has the general formula or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which each of X, Y and Z inde­ pendently represents a hydrogen or halogen atom or an alkyl or CF₃ group, R represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group, and n is 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4; (iii) 1-benzothiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea; (iv) 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-trifluoromethylaniline; and (v) a compound which has the general formula: or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which R¹ is a C(1-4) alkyl group.

Description: "HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF COMBATING UNDESIRED PLANT GROWTH" This invention relates to herbicidal compositions and method of combating undesired plant growth. U.K. Patent Application No. 2064537 discloses that the compound 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea is effective in the control of weeds. It has now been found that this compound can also act as a synergist when mixed with certain other herbicidal compounds, and thus that mixtures of certain herbicides with 3-( 3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-l ,l-dimethylurea exhibit an unexpected synergistic effect. The invention therefore provides a herbicidal composition which comprises 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (hereinafter referred to as compound A), together with at least one compound selected from: (i) a compound which has the general formula EMI1.1 or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which each of Xl and independently represents an iodine, bromine or chlorine atom; (ii) a compound which has the general formula EMI2.1 or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which each of X, Y and Z independently represents a hydrogen or halogen atom or an alkyl or CF3 group, R represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group, and n is 0, 1, 2, 3 or (iii) 1-benzothiazol-2-yl-1 ,3-dimethylurea; (iv) 2, 8-dinitro-N ,N-dipropyl-4-trifluoromethylaniline ; and (v) a compound which has the general formula: : EMI2.2 or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which (III) R1 is a C(1-4) alkyl group. The compositions according to the invention may contain two or more compounds within one of the groups (i) (ii) and (v), and/or two or more compounds from different groups (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v). Preferably however the compositions contain components selected from one only of groups (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v). The invention further provides a method of combating undesired plant growth at a locus, which comprises applying to the locus compound A and at least one compound selected from (i) to (v) above. In the formula I, each of XÚ and Xê preferably independently represents an iodine or bromine atom, and preferably X1 and X2 are the same. A compound (i) may be the free phenol of formul I, or it may be a salt or an ester thereof. Suitable salts include alkali metal salts, especially the sodium or potassium salt, and amine salts. Suitable amine salts include for example those of amines having up to three organic groups attached to the nitrogen, the organic groups being, for example, alkyl groups having up to 10 carbon atoms and being optionally substituted by, for example, hydroxy groups or halogen atoms. Suitable esters are for example alkyl esters, having for example up to 20, especially 6 to 12, carbon atoms in the alkyl moiety. Preferably, a compound (i) is the free phenol or its octanoate ester. Any alkyl group represented by R, X, Y or Z in the formula II preferably has up to four carbon atoms. In the formula II each of X, Y and Z preferably independently represent a chlorine or hydrogen atom or a methyl group. It is most preferable that one of X, Y and Z is a hydrogen atom, the other two substituents being chosen independently from chlorine atoms and methyl groups. Preferably R is a methyl group or a hydrogen atom and n is 0, 1 or 2. Typical compounds of group (ii) include 2-(4-chloro-2methylphenoxy)propanoic acid, 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propanoic acid, 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acid, 4-(4-chloro-2 methylphenoxy) butanoic acid and salts and esters thereof. A compound of group (ii) may be the free acid of formula II, or it may be a salt or an ester thereof. Suitable salts include alkali metal salts, especially the sodium or potassium salt, alkaline earth metal salts, for example the magnesium salt, and amine salts. Suitable amine salts include for example those of amines having up to three organic groups attached to the nitrogen, the organic groups being, for example, alkyl groups having up to 10 carbon atoms and being optionally substituted by, for example, hydroxy groups or halogen atoms. Suitable esters are for example alkyl esters, having for example up to 10 carbon atoms in the alkyl moiety, for example the various isomeric octyl esters. Preferably, a compound of group (ii) is the free acid or a potassium salt. A compound of group (ii) has an asymmetric carbon atom whenever R is other than a hydrogen atom and can therefore exist in two optically active forms. The invention should be understood to include the use of either isomer or any mixture thereof. An alkyl group R in the formula III is preferably a butyl group. Most preferably R1 is a secondary or tertiary butyl group. Typical compounds of group (v) include 2-tert-butyl-4,6- dinitrophenol, 2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol and salts and esters thereof. A compound of group (v) may be the free alcohol of formula III or it may be a salt or an ester thereof. Suitable salts include alkali metal salts, especially the sodium or potassium salt, alkaline earth metal salts, for example the magnesium salt, the ammonium salt and amine salts. Suitable esters are derived from substituted or unsubstituted carboxylic acids, especially alkanoic acids. Preferably a compound of group (v) is the free alcohol or the acetate thereof. The weight ratio of compound A to the compound selected from (i) to (v) may vary widely depending on the intended application. Preferably said ratio is in the range of from 1:50 to 50:1, preferably 1:20 to 20:1, especially 5:1 to 1:5. Suitably the dosage of each compound applied is in the range of from 0.05 to 5 kg/ha. Especially preferred dosages of certain binary mixtures are for example, from 0.3 to 3 kg/ha of compound A together with 0.05 to 2.5 kg/ha of a compound of group (i); 0.3 to 3 kg/ha of compound A together with 0.1 to 3.5 kg/ha of a compound of group (ii); 0.3 to 3 kg/ha of compound A together with 0.3 to 4 kg/ha of compound (iii); 0.25 to 3 kg/ha of compound A together with 0.25 to 3 kg/ha of compound (iv); and 0.25 to 3 kg/ha of compound A together with 0.25 to 3 kg/ha of a compound of group (v). The composition and method of the invention may be used for the control of weeds in a wide variety of crops, depending of course on the nature of the compound (i) to (v). Typical crops include, for example, cotton, soyabean, plantation crops such as sugar cane or vines, and, especially, cereals such as wheat, barley, maize and sorghum. Mixtures containing a compound of group (v) may also be especially useful in leguminous crops such as peas and beans. A wide range of broad leaved and grassy weeds are controlled. Application may be pre-emergence or, preferably, post-emergence. For certain applications, especially when resistant weeds are present, it may be desirable also to apply a further herbicide. For example, if severe infestations of wild oat are present in cereal crops, it may be advantageous to apply along with compound A and one or more compounds (i) to (v), one of the N,N-disubstituted alanine derivatives which are specialised narrow spectrum herbicides and described in U.K. Patent No. 1,164,160, for example the ethyl ester of N-benzoyl-N-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-2-aminopropionic acid, or the racemic mixture or laevo-rotatory isomer of the methyl or isopropyl ester of N benzOyl-N-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-2-aminopropionic acid or a broad-spectrum herbicide such as a triazine, for example cyanazine, atrazine or simazine. Further suitable compounds which may be present as a third component include metolachlor, chlortoluron, isoproturon and dichlofopmethyl. A composition according to the invention preferably also comprises one or more carriers. A carrier is any material with which the active ingredients are formulated to facilitate application to the locus to be treated, or to facilitate storage, transport or handling. A carrier may be a solid or a liquid, including a material which is normally gaseous but which has been compressed to form a liquid, and any of the carriers normally used in formulating herbicidal compositions may be used. Suitable solid carriers include natural and synthetic clays and silicates, for example natural silicas such as diatomaceous earths; magnesium silicates, for example talcs; magnesium aluminium silicates, for example attapulgites and vermiculites; aluminium silicates, for example kaolinites, montmorillonites and micas; calcium carbonate; calcium sulphate; synthetic hydrated silicon oxides and synthetic calcium or aluminium silicates; elements, for example carbon and sulphur; natural and synthetic resins, for example coumarone resins, polyvinyl chloride, and styrene polymers and copolymers; solid polychiorophenols; bitumen; waxes, for example beeswax, paraffin wax, and chlorinated mineral waxes; and solid fertlisers, for example superphosphates. Suitable liquid carriers include water; alcohols, for example isopropanol and glycols; for example acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone and cyclohexanone; ethers; aromatic or araliphatic hydrocarbons, for example benzene, toluene and xylene; petroleum fractions, for example kerosine and light mineral oils; chlorinated hydrocarbons, for example carbon tetrachloride, perchloroethylene and trichloroethane. Mixtures of different liquids are often suitable. Agricultural compositions are often formulated and transported in a concentrated form which is subsequently diluted by the user before application. The presence of small amounts of a carrier which is a surface-active agent facilitates this process of dilution. A surface-active agent may be an emulsifying agent, a dispersing agent or a wetting agent; it may be nonionic or ionic. Examples of suitable surface-active agents include the sodium or calcium salts of polyacrylic acids and lignin sulphonic acids; the condensation products of fatty acids or aliphatic amines or amides containing at least 12 carbon atoms in the molecule with ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide; fatty acid esters of glycerol, sorbitan, sucrose or pentaerythritol; condensates of these with ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide; condensation products of fatty alcohol or alkyl phenols, for example p- octylphenol or p-octylcresol, with ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide; sulphates or sulphonates of these condensation products; alkali or alkaline earth metal salts, preferably sodium salts, of sulphuric or sulphonic acid esters containing at least 10 carbon atoms in the molecule, for example sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium secondary alkyl sulphates, sodium salts of sulphonated castor oil, and sodium alkylaryl sulphonates such as sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonate; and polymers of ethylene oxide and copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide. The compositions of the invention may for example be formulated as wettable powders, dusts, granules, solutions, emulsifiable concentrates, emulsions, suspension concentrates and aerosols. Wettable powders usually contain 25, 50 and 75% w of active ingredient and usually contain, in addition to solid inert carrier, 3-10% w of a dispersing agent and, where necessary, 010% w of stabiliser(s) and/or other additives such as penetrants or stickers. Dusts are usually formulated as a dust concentrate having a similar compositions to that of a wettable powder but without a dispersant, and are diluted in the field with further solid carrier to give a composition usually containing 2-lO% w of active ingredient. Granules are usually prepared to have a size between 10 and 100 BS mesh (1.676 - 0.152 mm), and may be manufactured by agglomeration or impregnation techniques. Generally, granules will contain 9-25 w active ingredient and 0-10% w of additives such as stabilisers, slow release modifiers and binding agents. Emulsifiable concentrates usually contain, in addition to a solvent and, when necessary, co-solvent, 10-50% w/v active ingredient, 2-20% w/v emulsifiers and 0-20% w/v of other additives such as stabilisers, penetrants and corrosion inhibitors. Suspension concentrates are usually compounded so as to obtain a stable, non-sedimenting flowable product and usually contain 1075% w active ingredient, 0.5-15% w of dispersing agents, 0.110% w of suspending agents such as protective colloids and thixotropic agents, 0-10% w of other additives such as defoamers, corrosion inhibitors, stabilisers, penetrants and stickers, and water or an organic liquid in which the active ingredient is substantially insoluble; certain organic solids or inorganic salts may be present dissolved in the formulation to assist in preventing sedimentation or as anti-freeze agents for water. Aqueous dispersions and emulsions, for example compositions obtained by diluting a wettable powder or a concentrate according to the invention with water, also lie within the scope of the present invention. The said emulsions may be of the water-in-oil or of the oil-in-water type, and may have a thick 'mayonnaise'like consistency. The compositions of the invention may also contain other ingredients, for example, compounds possessing insecticidal or fungicidal properties. The following Examples illustrate the invention. General Procedure The tests conducted were foliar spray tests, in which seedling plants were sprayed with a formulation containing the test compound. Various test plant species were used, including blackgrass, speedwell, black nightshade and wild oats. The soil used in the tests was a prepared horticultural loam. Speedwell and wild oat seedlings had 0 or l true leaves, and blackgrass and black nightshade seedlings had 2 or 3 true leaves. The formulations used in the tests were prepared by diluting with water, solutions of the test compound or mixture in acetone containing 0.4% by weight of an alkylphenol/ethylene oxide condensate available under the trade name TRITON X-155. The acetone solutions were diluted with an equal volume of water and the resulting formulations applied at 4 different dosage levels designed to produce a range of responses. Three replicate pots were used for each treatment. Untreated seedlings plants were used as controls. As specified number of days after treatment, phytotoxicity compared with the untreated control, was assessed visually on a 0 to 9 scale, 0 indicating no effect and 9 indicating death. The results were subjected to a standard probit analysis by computer to calculate the dosage of each compound or mixture, in Kg/ha, required to kill 50% of the test species. This dosage is referred to as the GID50 dosage. If a mixture of herbicides A and B act together in an additive way, one would expect the GID50 values for A and B in the mixture to be given by the equations (i) and (ii) below: GID50 of B in mixture = ##### (i) b GID of A in mixture = (GID 0 of B in mixture)xoL (ii) 50 50 where a = GID50 of A used alone b = GID50 of B used alone &alpha; = weight ratio of compound A to compound B in mixture. If the measured GID50 values are in fact less than the calculated values, the mixture is synergistic. The results of the tests are given in the following Tables. The GID50 values are actual, measured values in kg/ha, and calculated values are given in brackets after the measured values. Example 1 This Example was carried out using the following compounds: A: , 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea. B: 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile, the commercial herbicide "Bromoxynil". It can be seen from the table of results (Table I) that this mixture was synergistic against all plant species tested - i.e., the measured dosages of the mixture required to kill 50% of the test plants were less than the calculated dosages. TABLE I Example 1 - Results Blackgrass Speedwell (assessment after 2 days) (assessment after 2 days) Mixture GID50 Mixture GID50 ratio A B ratio A B A:B A:B 1:0 .46(.46) 0(0) 1:0 .27(.27) 0(0) 1:1 .16(.21) .16(.2l) 16:1 .091(.15) .006(.009) 1:2 .070(.16) .14(.28) 8:1 .051(.10) .006(.013) 1:4 .056(.082) .23(.33) 4:1 .051(.064) .013(.016) 1:8 .039(.045) .31(.36) 2:1 .022(.036) .011(.018) 0:1 0(0) .40(.40) 0:1 0(0) .021(.021) Black Nightshade Wild Oats (assessment after 2 days) (assessment after 7 days) Mixture GID50 Mixture GID50 ratio A B ratio A B A:B A:B 1:0 .28(.28) 0(0) 1:0 .092(.092) 0(0) 4:1 .11(.18) .025(.044) 1:2 .034(.071) .068(.14) 2:1 .052(.13) .026(.065) 1:4 .045(.057) .18(.23) 1:1 .055(.084) .055(.084) 1:8 .035(.042) .28(.33) 1: :2 .040(.049) .080(.099) 1:16 .022(.027) .36(.43) 0:1 0(0) .12(.12) 0:1 0(0) .61(.61) Example 2 This Example was carried out using the following compounds: A: 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea B: 3, 5-dibromo-h-hydroxybenzonitrile octanoate ester. It can be seen from the table of results (Table II) that this mixture was synergistic in its action against black nightshade and wild oats, and approximately additive in its effect against speedwell and blackgrass. TABLE II Example 2 - Results Blackgrass Speedwell (assessment after 2 days) (assessment after 2 days) Mixture GID50 Mixture GID50 ratio A B ratio A B A:B A:B 1:0 .44(.44) 0(0) 1:0 .49(.44) O(0) 1:1 .13(.12) .13(.12) 32:1 .26(.34) .008(.010) 1:2 .054(.072) .1l(.lk) 16:1 .30(.27) .019(.017) .046(.039) .18(.16) 8:1 .22(.19) .028(.024) 1:8 .023(.021) .18(.17) 4:1 .11(.12) .027(.031) 0:1 0(0) .17(.17) 0:1 0(0) .044(.043) Black Nightshade Wild Oats (assessment after 2 days) (assessment after 12 days) Mixture GID50 Mixture GID50 ratio A B ratio A B A:B A:B 1:0 .34(.34) 0(0) 1:0 .14(.14) 0(o) 4:1 .14(.25) .035(.063) 1:2 .057(.13) .11(.26) 2:1 .20(.20) .10(.10) 1:4 .10(.12) .41(.47) 1: :1 .072(.14) .072(.14) 1:8 .058(.10) .46(.81) 1:2 .038(.089) .076(.18) 1:16 .034(.079) .54(1.27) 0:1 o(0) .24(.24) 0:1 0(0) 2.93(2.93) Example 3 This Example was carried out using the following compounds: A: 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea. B: The mono-methylamine salt of 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) propanoic acid, the commercial herbicide "Dichlorprop" Results are given in Tables IIIa and IIIb, which show that this mixture was synergistic against Black Nightshade at only 5 days after treatment whereas with Speedwell synergism was observed at 9 days after treatment. No synergism was observed against the Blackgrass. TABLE IIIa (Example 3 - Assessments made after 5 days) Blackgra GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.062(0.062) 0(0) 4:1 0.061(0.062) 0.015(0.016) 2:1 0.076(0.062) 0.038(0.031) 1:1 0.094(0.062) 0.094(0.062) 1:2 0.083(0.062) 0.166(0.124) 0:1@ - - Speedwe GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.20(0.25) 0(0) 16:1 0.28(0.21) 0.018(0.013) 8:1 0.18(0.18) 0.023(0.022) 4:1 0.14(0.14) 0.034(0.035) 2:1 0.091(0.097) 0.045(0.4 0:1 0(0) 0.081(0.080) Black Nightsha GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.17(0.17) 1:8 0.004(0.009) 0.033(0.07 1:16 o.oo4(0.oo5) 0.060(0.075) 1:32 0.002(0.002) 0.067(0.076) 1:64 0.001(0.001) 0.075(0.076) 0:1 0(0) 0.077(0.077) @ component B alone not active against blackgrass. TABLE IIIb (Example 3 - Assessments made after 9 days) Blackgrass GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.016(0.016) 0(0) 4:1 0.017(0.016) 2:1 0.022(0.016) 0.011(0.008) 1:1 0.025(0.016) 0.025(0.016) 1:2 0.023(0.016) 0.046(0.032) 0.1 Speedwell GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.15(0.15) 0(0) 16:1 0.13(0.13) 0.008(0.008) 8:1 0.099(0.11) 0.012(0.014) 0.068(0.086) 0.017(0.021) 2:1 0.042(0.060) 0.021(0.030) 0:1 0(0) 0.050(0.050) Black Nightshade GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.0052(0.0052) 0(0) 1:8 0.0024(0.0042) 0.019(0.034) 1:16 0.0026(0.0037) 0.042(0.059) 1:32 0.0018(0.0029) 0.057(0.091) 1:64 0.0011(0.0020) 0.070(0.125) 0:1 0(0) 0.20(0.20) Example 4 This Example was carried out using the following compounds: A: 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea B: The potassium salt of 2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)- propanoic acid, the commercial herbicide "Mecoprop". Results are given in Tables IVa and IVb, which show that this mixture is synergistic in its action against Blackgrass and Black Nightshade after only 5 days. No synergism was observed against Speedwell. TABLE IV (Example 4 - Assessments made after 5 days) Blackgra GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.084(0.084) 0(0) 4:1 0.060(0.084) 0.015(0.02) 2:1 0.049(0.084) 0.025(0.04) 1:1 0.049(0.084) 0.049(0.08) 1:2 0:1@ - - Speedwell GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.110(0.120) o(o) 16:1 0.090(0.100) 0.006(0.00 8:1 0.100(0.087) 0.013(0.011) 4:1 0.072(0.069) 0.018(0.017) 2:1 0.050(0.049) 0.025(0.02) 0:1 0(0) 0.039(0.04) Black Nightshade Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.005(0.005) o(o) 1:4 0.001(0.003) 0.004(0.001) 1:8 0.0009(0.0020) 0.007(0.01) 1:16 0.0002(0.0010) 0.004(0.01) 1:32 0.0005(0.0010) 0.015(0.019) 0:1 0(0) 0.022(0.02 component B alone not active against blackgrass. TABLE IVb (Example 4 - Assessments made after 9 days) Blackgrass GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.034(0.034) 0(0) 4:1 0.018(0.034) 0.005(0.009) 2:1 0.019(0.034) 0.010(0.017) 1:1 0.016(0.034) 0.016(0.034) 1:2 0.015(0.034) 0.030(0.068) 0:1 Speedwell GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.040(0.040) 0(0) 16:1 0.042(0.037) 0.003(0.002) 8:1 0.048(0.034) 0.006(0.004) 4:1 0.039(0.030) 0.010(0.008) 2:1 0.025(0.024) 0.013(0.012) 0:1 O(0) 0.031(0.031) Black Nightshade Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.0016(0.0018) o(o) 1:4 0.0023(0.0017) 0.0090(0.0068) 1:8 0.0018(0.0016) 0.014(0.013) 1:16 0.0008(0.0013) 0.013(0.022) 1:32 0.0012(0.0010) 0.039(0.034) 0:1 0(0) 0.076(0.076) Example 5 The following compounds are used in this Example: A: 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea B: (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid, the commercial herbicide "2,4-D". Results, assessed after 6 days, are given in Table V Synergism can be clearly seen. TABLE V Mixture ratio Blackgrass A:B GID50 A B 1:0 0.086 (0.086) o (o) 4:1 0.051 (0.086) 0.013 (0.022) 2:1 0.094(0.086) 0.047(0.043) 1:1 0.043(0.084) 0.043(0.086) 1:2 0.051 (0.086) 0.10 (0.17) 0:1 - - - Mixture ratio Speedwell A:B GID50 A B 1:0 o.g4 (0.94) 0 (0) 16:1 0.13 (0.61) 0.008 (0.038) 8:1 0.18(0.46) 0.022(0.057) 4:1 0.17(0.30) 0.043(0.075) 2:1 0.074 (0.18) 0.037 (0.089) 0:1 0(0) 0.11(0.11) Mixture ratio Black Nightshade A:B GID50 A B 1:0 0.004 (0.004) o (o) 1:1 0.0026 (0.004) 0.0026 (0.004) 1:2 0.0019 (0.004) 0.0039 (0.007) 1:4 0.0019 (0.003) 0.0077 (0.013) 1:8 0.0010 (0.003) 0.0083 (0.022) 0:1 o (o) 0.068 (0.068) Example 6 The following compouns were used in this Example: A: 3-(3-methyl-4.isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea B: (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) acetic acidm the commercial herbicide "MCPA". Results, assessed after 12 days, are given in Table VI. Synergism can be clearly seen. TABLE VI Mixture ratio Blackgrass A:B GID50 A B 1:0 0.065 (0.065) o (o) 4:1 0.054 (0.065) 0.014 (0.016) 2:1 0.052 (0.065) 0.026 (0.033) 1:1 o.o46 (0.065) o.o46 (o.o6s) 1:2 o.o48 (0.065) 0.098 (0.13) 0:1 - - - Mixture ratio Black Nightshade A:B GID50 A B 1:0 0.0053 (0.0053) 0 (0) 1:1 0.0041 (0.005) 0.0041 (0.005) 1:2 0.0033(0.005) 0.0066(0.009) 1:4 0.0028 (0.004) o.o11 (0.016) 1:8 0.0020 (0.003) 0.016 (0.026) 0:1 o (o) 0.069 (0.069) Example 7 In this Example, the following compounds were used: A: 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. B: l-Benzothiazol-2-yl-l,3-dimethylurea the commercial herbicide methabenzthiazuron. The results, assessed after 12 days, are given in Table VII, and show that the mixtures tested showed significant synergism against both speedwell and black nightshade. TABLE VII Speedwell GID50 Mixture ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.62 (0.62 (0.62) 0 (0) 32:1 0.34 (0.42) 0.010 (0.013) 16:1 0.25 (0.32) 0.016 (0.020) 8:1 0.18 (0.22) 0.022 (0.027) 4:1 0.084 (0.13) 0.021 (0.033) 0:1 0 (0) 0.042 (0.042) Black Nightshade GID50 Mixture ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.014(0.014) 0.0066(0.009) 4:1 0.018(0.013) 0.004(0.003) 2:1 0.014 (0.013) 0.007 (0.006) 1:1 0.005 (0.012) 0.005 (0.012) 1:2 0.003 (0.010) 0.005 (0.019) 0:1 0 (0) 0.059 (0.059) Example 8 In this Example, the following compounds were used: A: 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. B: 2,6-Dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-trifluoromethlaniline the commercial herbicide trifluralin. The results, assessed after 13 days, are given in Table VIII, and show that the mixtures tested showed significant synergism. TABLE VIII Speedwell GID Mixture 50 Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.37(0.37) 0(0) 8:1 0.27(0.32) 0.033(0.039) 4:1 0.16(0.28) 0.039(0.069) 2:1 0.13(0.22) 0.066(0.011) 1:1 0.10(0.16) 0.10(0.16) 0:1 o(0) 0.27(0.27) Blackgrass GID Mixture 50 Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.013(0.013) 0(0) 1:2 0.006(0.011) 0.011(0.021) 1:4 0.003(0.009) 0.014(0.035) 1:8 0.003(0.007) 0.023(0.053) 1:16 0.003(0.004) 0.048(0.072) 0:1 o(o) 0.11(0.11) Wild Oats GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.96(0.96) O(O) 2:1 0.25(0.56) 0.13(0.28) 1:1 0.15(0.39) 0.15(0.39) 1:2 0.085(0.25) 0.17(0.49) 1:4 0.081(0.14) 0.32(0.56) 0/1 0(0) 0.66(0.66) Example 9 In this Example, the following compounds were used: A: : 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. B: 2-tert-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol the commercial herbicide Dinoterb. The results, assessed after 6 days, are given in Table IX, and show that the mixtures tested showed significant synergism. TABLE IX Speedwell GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 3.55(3.55) 0(0) 16:1 0.99(1.10) 0.062(0.069) 8:1 0.52(0.65) 0.065(0.082) 4:1 0.27(0.36) 0.066(0.090) 2:1 0.13(0.19) 0.067(0.095) 0:1 o(o) 0.10(0.10) Black Nightshade GID Mixture 50 Ratio A:B A B 1:0 0.047(0.047) 0(0) 4:1 0.012(0.027) 0.003(0.007) 2:1 0.008(0.019) 0.004(0.010) 1:1 0.004(0.012) 0.004(0.012) 1:2 0.003(0.007) 0.005(0.014) 0:1 0(0) 0.016(0.016) Wild Oats GID50 Mixture Ratio A:B A B 1:0 3.36(3.36) O(0) 2:1 1.24(2.18) 0.62(1.09) 1:1 1.48(1.61) 1.48(1.61) 1:2 0.86(1.06) 1.73(2.12) 1 4 0.58(0.63) 2.31(2.51) 0:1 0(0) 3.09(3.09)

Claims: Claims 1. A herbicidal composition which comprises 3-(3-methyl-4- isopropylphenyl)- 1 , 1-dimethylurea (hereinafter referred to as compound A), together with at least one compound selected from: (i) a compound which has the general formula EMI29.1 or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which each of X1 and X2 independently represents an iodine, bromine or chlorine atom; (ii) a compound which has the general formula EMI29.2 or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which each of X, Y and Z independently represents a hydrogen or halogen atom or an alkyl or CF3 group, R represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group, and n is 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4; (iii) 1-benzothiazol-2-yl-1 ,3-dimethylurea; (iv) 2, 6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-trifluoromethylaniline; ; and (v) a compound which has the general formula: EMI30.1 or is a salt or an ester thereof, in which R1 is a C(1-4) alkyl group. 2. A composition as claimed in claim 1, in which XÚ and Xê in formula I both represent iodine atoms or both represent bromine atoms. 3. A composition as claimed in either claim 1 or claim 2 in which a compound of group (i) is the free phenol of formula I or is an alkali metal salt, amine salt, or alkyl ester thereof. 4. A composition as claimed in claim 3, in which a compound of group (i) is the free phenol of formula I or the octanoate ester thereof. 5. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, in which any alkyl group represented by R, X, Y or Z in formula II has up to 4 carbon atoms. 6. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, which each of X, Y and Z in formula II independently represents a hydrogen or chlorine atom or a methyl group. 7. A composition as claimed in claim 6 in which one of X, Y and Z in formula II is a hydrogen atom, the other two substituents being chosen independently from chlorine atoms and methyl groups. 8. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 in which R in formula II represents a hydrogen atom or methyl group. 9. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 in which a compound of group (ii) is 2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) propanoic acid, 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propanoic acid, 4- chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acid or 4-(4-chloro-2- methylphenoxy)butanoic acid or a salt or an ester thereof. 10. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9 in which a compound of group (ii) is the free acid of formula II or is an alkali metal salt, alkaline earth metal salt, amine salt, or alkyl ester thereof. 11. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10 in which R in the formula III is a butyl group. 12. A composition as claimed in claim 11 in which R in the formula III is a secondary or tertiary butyl group. 13. A composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, in which a compound of group (v) is the free alcohol of formula III or is an alkali metal salt, alkaline earth metal salt, ammonium salt, amine salt or an ester thereof. 14. A composition as claimed in claim 13 in which a compound of group (v) is the free alcohol of formula III or the acetate thereof. 15. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims which also comprises one or more carriers. 16. A method of combating undesired plant growth at a locus, which comprises applying to the locus compound A together with at least one compound selected from groups (i) to (v) as defined in any one of claims 1 to 14. 17. A method as claimed in claim 16, in which the compounds are applied in the form of a composition as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15. 18. A method as claimed in either claim 16 or claim 17 in which the locus treated is a crop area bearing plants or seeds of cereals.

Inventors: LOFTUS, LYNN, RAVEN, CLIVE ALAN, SWAINSON, GILLIAN
Applicants: SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V.
Application year: 1982
Main classification: A01N47
IPC codes: A01N47