RANDOM DROPLET LIQUID JET APPARATUS AND PROCESS

Abstract: Fluid or liquid jet marking apparatus and process wherein the treating fluid or liquid (10) is in the form of ink, dyestuff or other printing, marking or coloring medium, is delivered under pressure to an array of jet orifices (14) from which the medium issues continuously as streams (16) that break randomly into discrete drop­ lets in flight. The moving random droplets are select­ ively charged as they pass through a selectively ener­ gizable electrostatic field (18). The paths of charged droplets are controlled by a deflection means (20) which establishes a second electrostatic field through which the droplets pass. Depending on whether the droplets are charged, they are either caught by a collector (22), or impinge on a receiving substrate such as a textile, paper or any other desired medium, product or sub­ stance. In the apparatus, the streams (16) break up ran­ domly into droplets. Since the apparatus is not provided with a separate stimulator, vibrator or perturbation device, the orifice plate can have virtually an unlimited cross-machine length. It has been found that by control­ ling certain equipment parameters, such random droplet breakup can occur within a narrow distribution around a mean droplet size to produce results very much the same as with perturbed systems that use separate, regularly cyclical varicosity inducing means, and in many cases are superior to perturbed systems in a large variety of applications as the lenght of the orifice plate is not limited in size. The undesirable effects of droplet to droplet size and spacing variation become narrowed with increased pressure on the fluid or liquid supply and decreased diameter of the jet orifices.

Description: RANDOM DROPLET LIQUID JET APPARATUS AND PROCESS. FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to the field of noncontact fluid marking devices which are commonly known as Sink jet" devices. THE PRIOR ART Ink jet devices are shown generally in U.S. Patent No. 3,373,437, issued March 12, 1968, to Sweet & Cumming: No. 3,560,988, issued February 2, 1971 to Krick; No. 3,579,721, issued May 25, 1971 to Kaltenbach; and No. 3,596,275, to Sweet, issued July 27, 1971. In all of those devices, jets (very narrow streams) are created by forcing a supply of recordinq fluid or ink from a manifold through a series of fine orifices or nozzles. The chamber which contains the ink or the orifices by which the jets are formed are vibrated or "stimulated" so that the jets break up into droplets of uniform size and regular spacing. Each stream of drops is formed in proximity to an associated selective charging electrode which establishes electrical charges on the drops as they are formed. The flight of the drops to a receiving substrate is controlled by interaction with an electrostatic deflection field through which the drops pass, which selectively deflects them in a trajectory toward the substrate, or to an-ink collection and recirculation apparatus (commonly called a gutter") which prevents them from contacting the substrate. While it has been known that a fine liquid jet will break into discrete droplets under its inherent thermal and acoustic motion even in the absence of any external perturbations, it has heretofore generally been believed that specifically calibrated separate perturbation at or near the natural frequency of drop formation was a practical necessity to produce droplets that are regularly spaced, sized, and timed across the orifice array to permit proper use of the apparatus. Printing with charged drops requires relatively precise control of the droplet paths to the ultimate positions on the receiving substrate, and drop size, spacing, and charge level have generally been regarded as critical factors. Thus, Sweet requires perturbation means for assuring that droplets in the stream are spaced at regular intervals and are uniform in size. As noted in Sweet, the stream has a natural tendency, due at least in part to the surface tension of the fluid, to break up into a succession of droplets. However, as is easily observed in a jet of water squirted through a garden hose nozzle, the droplets are ordinarily not uniform as to dimension or frequency. In order to assure that the droplets will be substantially uniform in dimension and frequency, Sweet provides means for introducing what he refers to as "regularly spaced varicosities" in the stream. These varicosities create undulations in the crosssectional dimension of the jet stream issuing from the nozzle. They are made to occur at or near the natural frequency of formation of the droplets. As in Sweet, this frequency may be typically on the order of 120,000 cycles per second. A wide variety of varicosity inducing means are now known in the art. For example, Krick utilizes a supersonic vibrator in the piping through which ink is fed from the source to the apparatus; and in Kaltenbach, the ink is ejected through orifices formed in a perforated plate which is vibrated continuously at a resonant frequency. Since the advent of the Sweet approach, noncontact marking devices utilizing fluid droplet streams have become commercially developed. However, so far as is known to me, it has been a characteristic of ink jet devices that all of them utilize some type of varicosity inducing means or tstimulatorw to induce regular vibrations into the stream to provide regularity and uniformity of.the droplets. As noted in Stoneburner U.S. Patent No. 3,882,508, issued May 6, 1975, proper stimulation has been one of the most difficult problems in the operation of jet drop recorders. For high quality recording it has been necessary that all jets be stimulated at the same frequency and with very nearly the same power to cause break-up of all the streams into uniformly sized and regularly spaced drops. Furthermore, it is necessary that drop generation not be accompanied by generation of "satellite drops", and that the break-up of the streams into drops occur at a predetermined location in proximity to the charging electrode, both of which are dependent on the power of delivery at each jet. Stoneburner shows means for generating a traveling wave along the length of an ink supply manifold of which an orifice plate forms one side. The wave guide so formed is tapered or progressively decreased in width along its length, to counteract and reduce the natural tendency toward attenuation of the drop stimulating bending waves as they travel down the length of the orifice plate. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION In practice, there is often an undesirable interaction between the stimulator and the structure of the ink delivery system. This adverse effect may show up as a tendency for the overall system to achieve non-uniform stimulation across the orifice array due to reflected and interfering waves (as referred to in Stoneburner, just discussed), such that certain orifices do not receive appropriate stimulation while others have too much. The system thus has "cusps" or null points that are reflected as degradations in the quality of droplet deposition. Furthermore, with these variations in power, satellite or very small droplets tend to form in between each of the larger droplets and cause difficulties within the system in that these fine droplets tend to escape and be dispersed into the surrounding area or beyond the acceptable target area limits. Satellite droplet formation is a sensitive function of the properties of the ink or treating liquid being used so that the problem of stimulation is further complicated. Another and major limiting factor of the known perturbed ink jet systems resulting from the stimulator is that the traveling waves generated by the external or artificial perturbation means substantially limit the length of those devices. From a practical standpoint, such known devices are limited to cross-machine orifice plate lengths no greater than 10.5 inches (26.67 cm) where there are 120 jets to the inch and the artificial perturbation means is operating at 48 kilocycles. At higher frequencies the possible length of the orifice plates is reduced, while at lower frequencies the length might be lengthened. There are numerous disadvantages associated with such orifice plate limitations. The primary disadvantage is encountered in trying to build a perturbed orifice system suitable for treatment of continuous length broad width goods, for example including those in the textile field, wallpaper, paper or other continuous length broad width goods or in continuously or intermittently fed forms of other wide substrates or materials, where any such goods, substrates or materials range in width from about one foot to about several yards. Experience shows that it is extrememly difficult and, practically speaking, almost impossible to combine two or more of the limited length perturbed orifice plates across the needed distance in a manner that will permit the uniform continuous treating of such goods or materials sufficiently to mask the separation between the perturbed orifice plate sections, and/or to mask the effect of their mutually different operational patterns. It becomes increasingly difficult to obtain a satisfactory result as the number of such short length perturbed orifice plates is increased to span increasing widths of goods to be treated. With the present invention, however, where no artificial or external perturbation is being used, there is virtually no limitation on the length of the orifice plate or the extent over which such orifices can be made available for use across the width of a wide or narrow substrate or receiving medium. Thus, textile paper or other substrates having widths varying from a few feet to many yards can be treated as they are moved or otherwise indexed beneath a single, machine-wide orifice structure A plurality of such machine-wide orifices can of course be operated in tandem or in some predetermined manner or sequence to accomplish any desired result. I have found that although droplet break-up in an unperturbed, continuous jet system is a random proce-ss, the distribution of random droplet sizes and spacings is nevertheless quite narrow. I have also found that at smaller orifice sizes and higher fluid pressures, the variations among randomly generated droplets can be made sufficiently narrow so that the resulting random droplet streams become useful, for example, in applying color patterns or any type of treating agent or agents to textiles or for applying indicia or treatments to a variety of other surfaces employing a variety of liquids. This "narrow random distribution" effect is utilized according to a preferred form of the invention in apparatus having: a source of treating liquid which is to be applied under higher pressure than is normally used for equivalent accuracy of droplet placement; a series of jet orifices of smaller diameter than usual, for equivalent droplet placement accuracy, through which orifices the treating liquid or coloring medium is forced as fine streams that break randomly into discrete droplets; electrode means for imparting electrostatic charges to the drops as they forme and deflection means for directing the paths of selected droplets in the streams toward a receiving substrate or toward a gutter or other collecting means. Further, the charging electrode is more extensive than with a stimulated system since the break-off point may vary more in both space and time. Neither the apparatus nor the process has perturbation means that would impart regular cyclical vibrations or cause the liquid being applied to break into droplets more uniform than their unperturbed, random size distribution. To achieve a given accuracy- of droplet placement, or "droplet misregistration value," an unperturbed system with the same flow rate requires a different orifice size and pressure than a perturbed system. The orifice size must be smaller than would be used to achieve the same accuracy in a conventional perturbed system, typically no more than about 70% the orifice diameter of a perturbed system having the same accuracy of droplet placement or droplet misregistration value. The liquid head pressure is also or alternatively, substantially higher, preferably at least about four times that of a perturbed system with corresponding accuracy. Further, it is desirable that the charging voltage be higher, by a factor of at least about 1.5 times. For purposes of this specification and claims, the term "droplet misregistration value" is defined as the offset distance or variation from a straight line, measured in- a direction perpendicular to the direction of travel of the substrate, of a mark on the substrate when all jets in an array perpendicular to the direction of motion of the substrate are switched at the same time from being caught by the gutter to being delivered to the substrate. The perturbations that cause drop break-off in unstimulated jets generally arise from the environment in which the system is found. Generally these fluctuations are produced by the normal sound and acoustic motion that are inherently present in the fluid. However, in some "noisy" environments, unwanted external perturbations, for example, factory whistles, vibrations from gears and other machine movements, and even sound vibrations from human voices, can have an overpowering influence and cause a change in the mean break-off point of the jets in an unstimulated system. In a modified embodiment of this invention, the system can be irregularly stimulated, as by a noise source which generates random vibrations. I believe this embodiment can be found useful where the apparatus is to be used in a noisy area. In such an environment, the application of the irregular noise vibration will surprisingly produce more regular results from jet to jet than application of regular cyclical vibrations. Other objects, features, and characteristics of the present invention as well as the process, and operation and functions of the related elements and the combination of parts, and the economies of manufacture, will become more apparent from the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the accompanying drawings: FIGURE 1 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional illustration of a binary continuous fluid or liquid jet apparatus in accordance with the invention; FIGURE 2 is a diagrammatic perspective illustration showing the droplet charging means and the droplet deflecting means; FIGURE 3 is a schematic illustration of a modified embodiment of the invention wherein the apparatus is stimulated by a random noise generator that drives an acoustic horn; and FIGURE 4 is a diagrammatic illustration of another embodiment of a random noise perturbed system in accordance with the invention, wherein a series of piezoelectric crystals apply random noise perturbations to a wall of the fluid or liquid supply manifold or chamber. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE PRESENT INVENTION While this invention may be similar to previously known ink jet recording apparatus in that similar results.can be achieved, the basic operating principle of the present invention offers radically from such known ink jet recording systems. As shown diagrammatically in Figure 1 and 2, the apparatus includes a supply or source of treating liquid 10 under pressure in a manifold or chamber that supplies an orifice plate 12 having a plurality of jet orifices 14. Streams or jets of liquid 16 forced through the orifices 14 pass through electrostatic droplet charging means 18, 18, which selectively imparts to the liquid charges that are retained on the droplets as the streams break into discrete droplets. The charging plates 18, 18 must be sufficiently extensive in length and have a dimension wide enough in the direction of jet flow to charge droplets regardless of the random points at which their break-off occurs. In prior art apparatus, the perturbations caused break-off to occur in a narrow zone, downstream of the orifices. Here, without regular or separate artificial or external perturbation, the point of break-off varies more widely. In order to assure that all late-to-breakeoff droplets are charged, the ribbon like charging plates 18, 18 must provide a field that extends to the region of breakoff of such droplets. In practice, the ribbon like charqina Plates should Preferably have X dimen EMI10.1 sion or about iuua incnes±, wnere a is tne or 1± ice EMI10.2 diameter in inchesfS ir width or dimension in the direction of droplet flow could range from a size greater than about 30d to less than about 300d. Charging voltages to charge plates 18,18 preferably range from about 50 to about 200 volts. After charging, the droplets in flight then pass a deflecting ribbon or means 20 which directs the paths of the charged droplets toward a suitable gutter or collector 22. Uncharged drops proceed toward a receiving substrate 24, which is supported by and may be conveyed in some predetermined manner by means not shown, relative to the apparatus, in the direction of arrow 26. The deflector ribbon or means 20 is preferably operated at voltages ranging from about 1000 to about 3000 volts. Reference may be had to known ink jet devices for further details of structural elements suitable for use in such apparatus. In part, the structure of the present invention differs from the prior art in that the streams break up into droplets in response to a variety of factors including internal factors such as surface tension, internal acoustic motion, and thermal motion, rather than regular external perturbation. No regular varicosity inducing means are utilized, in contrast to what has heretofore been believed essential. Droplet formation takes place randomly. Lord Rayleigh explored the dynamics of fluid jets around the beginning of the 20th century. He found that a fluid stream issuing under pressure from a jet orifice breaks into individual droplets at droplet-to-droplet intervals that statistically average 2Tr r, where r is the radius of the orifice producing the jet. The droplet diameters average about 2.11 d. However, these spacings and sizes are only averages. Actual break-up is a random process; the actual droplet size and spacings vary. The actual sizes and spacings follow normal distribution curves around the means defined by the Rayleigh formulae and in experiments since Lord Ravleish's work I have found EMI11.1 tnat tne averageis now better represented Dy tne expression 4.51d with 4.51 being an observed or measured number. For example, in apparatus having an ink pressure P of 12 psig and an orifice diameter of EMI11.2 EMI11.3 .002" # , the mean droplet size is about .004" # . The normalized standard deviation of the droplet sizes (that is, the standard deviation of droplet size, divided by the mean droplet size) is about .1: that EMI11.4 is. 68% ot the droPlets are within .OOO4mean EMI11.5 droplet size of .004" #. Furtner, the break-off point varies from jet to jet by up to six drop spacings. These variances are too wide for utility in many applications. When intending to print a horizontal line across a substrate, all jets are commanded to print at the same time by removing voltage from the charge plate at all jet positions. It can be seen that if all jets break up into droplets at the same time and at the same distance from the orifice plate, the system will simultaneously cause all jets to start issuing uncharged drops and these drops will proceed to the paper in step. For the normalized standard deviation of droplet size of approximately 0.1, as is encountered in practice, this corresponds to about a 32% chance the droplet will be larger or smaller by that amount and the spot size-on the substrate will correspond ingly vary by that size. This produces variation in the apparent uniformity of a horizontal line. This effect will be minor, however, in that for a deviation EMI12.1 of .1 with a droplet of .004" # in diameter, the variation will only be .001" (0,0025 cm). EMI12.2 In flight from the point of break-off, larger drops have more mass than smaller drops, in proportion to the third power of the ratio of their diameters. The fluid dynamic force from passage through air that tends to slow them down is proportional to the square of the ratio of their diameters so that larger drops tend to maintain faster speeds in traveling to the substrate. Assuminq, however, that all iets break off EMI12.3 at the same time, for an orifice diameter of .003"z, distance to the substrate of one inch, a iet velocity EMI12.4 EMI12.5 of 400 inches per secondz dilA a deviation of .1 inch A drop diameter, the misregistration on the substrate is less than two thousandths of an inchC01oOSlcm). In the event one jet breaks off closer to the orifice plate than the mean break-off point of all jets by some number n of mean drop spacings (half the total spread) the resulting droplet (which I shall call the "late droplet") will have a farther distance to travel to the substrate than a droplet from the mean breakoff point (which I shall call the "mean droplet"). To date, the total spread of drop spacings I have noticed is about 6 or +3 and -3 about the mean. However, drop spacings can vary from this, for example, from about 2 to about 8 but will generally be areater than about 1. If V is the iet velocitv in EMI12.6 EMI12.7 inches per second #, d the orifice diameter in inches#, and V' the rate of movement of the substrate in inches EMI12.8 per second¯Etr-arrival of the late droplet at the substrate will occur about n (4.51d/V) seconds after the arrival-of the mean droplet. During this time interval the moving substrate will have traveled a EMI13.1 distance of n (4.51d) V'/V inches #. By way of example, at a substrate speed of 60 inches per second EMI13.2 (corresponding to a substrate moving at 100 yards per EMI13.3 minute), a let velocity razzof inches per second #, an EMI13.4 orifice diameter of .003 inches #, and with n = 6, the EMI13.5 misregistration error is .0061 inches #. It is to be noted that if d were times larger and V twice smaller, the error would be 2 /a¯larger, or about .017 EMI13.6 inches #. Thus, the use of the smaller diameter orifice and the higher pressure fluid in an unstimulated system can achieve smaller misregistration errors than a perturbed system of conventional orifice diameter and pressure. In devices heretofore available, perturbation means have been required to narrow the distribution in drop size to essentially zero, to achieve acceptable misregistration error. However, I have found that errors due to the distribution of drop sizes can be substantially reduced by certain conditions. This can be seen from the following analysis. The normalized standard deviation of droplet size remains constant as the diameter of the orifice is made smaller and also as the pressure P is increased, in the absence of perturbing means. If the orifice diameter is reduced by, say, a factor of the square root of two (V2), the area of the orifice is accordingly decreased by a factor of two. If at the same time stream velocity is increased by a factor of two, the net flow from the orifice remains constant. For similar charge and deflection fields the drop trajectories remain constant, but the natural frequency now is 2#2 higher and there are now 2#2 as many drops formed per unit time, and the time of flight to the substrate is halved. If the breakup point with a full sized jet varied six drop spaces due to the random nature of break-up, as is often the case, a print error would occur of six times the break-off time interval times the speed of the substrate. With the smaller, higher pressure jet, the same error in break-off distance would result in an error only 1/2 z as great, that is, 2.12 instead of six or only 35% of the error above. Furthermore, fluctuations in density would now be averaged over drops; if there is a 32% chance that the drop radius for the larger orifice case varied 10%, with a corresponding volume variation of 33%, there would only be a 9% chance the smaller orifice system would so vary. Though a stimulated system can in principle be designed to deliver with high accuracy, in practice errors occur of up to two drop spacings. With an unstimulated system, the break-off point can vary over six to seven drop spacings, but by reducing orifice size and increasing pressure, this error can be reduced to that of a stimulated system with the larger orifice size, while still offering the advantage of substantially unlimited orifice plate length. In general for this purpose, the orifice size EMI14.1 may be in the range of .00035 to .020 inches and the fluid or liauid pressure mav be in the ranee of 2 to EMI14.2 500 psig#. The value of droplet misregistration error can be less than about 0.1 inch for applications on substrates having a relatively smooth surface while for application to substrates having relatively unsmooth, rough or fibrous surfaces the droplet misreqistration error can be less than about 0.4 EMI14.3 inchesven #, or even 0.9 inches # where such misregistration could be acceptable, such as where the printing or image will only be viewed from a distance. More specifically I have found that general applications of a liquid to treat a substrate require EMI15.1 an or it ice diameter or about 0.004 inches#, with the center to center spacing of orifices being about 0.016 EMI15.2 inches#. The liquid head pressures behind the orifices EMI15.3 can vary from about 2 to about 30 psig #. However, the preferred pressure ranae varies from about 3 to about EMI15.4 7 psig #. The substrate can move at a velocitv (V' ) of EMI15.5 about 0 to about 480 inches # per secona with a preferred narrower ranae varvina from about 5 to about EMI15.6 150 inches # per second and the most Preferred rate EMI15.7 being about 60 inches per second 0100 yards per minute). More general ranges for the parameters involved, including the orifice and pressure ranges, are a iet velocitv (V) ransins from about 200 to about EMI15.8 3200 inches per second # with the more preferred velocity ranqe varvinq from about 200 to about 500 EMI15.9 inches per second general purpose liquid applicator and the most preferred jet velocity being EMI15.10 about 400 inches per second ¯also, in certain instances substrates could be moved it rates faster EMI15.11 than 480 inches per second #, such as speeds of 800-1000 EMI15.12 incnes±per second, ana tunis apparatus couia nave EMI15.13 applicability to print such substrate feed rates. Fine printing, coloring, and/or imaging of substrates similar to the results obtainable from a perturbed system can be obtained with the present invention by using an orifice having a diameter of EMI15.14 about 0.0013 inches # with appropriate center to center spacing. The pressures will be greater than in the general application circumstances above and will range EMI15.15 from about 15 to about 70 psig #, wlth the preferred EMI15.16 pressure being about 30 psig #. Here, jet velocities will -preferably vary from about 600 to about 1000 EMI16.1 inches per secondrwith the preferred velocity being about 800 inches per second EMI16.2 The viscosities of the ink, colorant or treating liquid are limited only by the characteristics of the particular treating liquid or coloring medium relative to the orifice dimension. From a practical standpoint, the liquid or medium will generally have a viscosity less than about 100 cps and preferably about 1 to about 25 cps. Since the present invention can produce applicators of virtually almost any orifice plate length, as discussed previously, the range of application, unlike the previously discussed perturbed systems, is extremely broad. This is because the jet orifices can not only be constructed in very short lengths, such as a few centimeters or inches, they can also extend for anv desired distance for examPle,01lto EMI16.3 15 teet(tr longer. Accordingly, the present invention is uniquely suitable for use with wide webs or where relatively large surfaces are to be colored or printed with indicia of some type. One example is printing, coloring or otherwise placing images on textiles but it should be clearly understood this is not the only application of this invention. In a similar manner the characteristics of the receiving substrate can vary markedly. In textile applications all textile dyes and dyestuffs and colorants can be used, being either natural or synthetic, so long as they are compatible with the material from which the orifice plate is constructed, such as stainless steel or other chemically resistant materials or combinations thereof, and are compatible as well with the orifice dimensions which are desired to be used. (Large particle materials can cause unwanted clogging.) Suitable textile dyes include reactive, vat, disperse, direct, acid, basic, alizarine, azoic, naphtol, pigment and sulphur dyes. Included among suitable colorants are inks, tints, vegetable dyes, lakes, mordants and mineral colors. Included among the types of treating liquids are any desired printing, coloring or image forming agents or mediums, including fixatives, dispersants, salts, reductants, oxidants, bleaches, resists, fluorescent brighteners and gums as well as any other known chemical finishing agents such as various resins and reactants and components thereof, in addition to numerous additives and modifing agents. It is believed that all such materials could be effectively employed according to the present invention to produce desired effects on a variety of substrates, as for example, all types of paper and paper like products, cloth and textile webs of various woven, knitted, needled, tufted, felted, batt, spun-, bonded and other non-woven types, metal sheet, plastics, glass, gypsum and similar composition board, various laminates including plywood, veneers, chipboard, various fiber and resin cottposites like Masonite, or any other material as well as on a variety of surfaces including flat, curved, smooth, roughened, or various other forms. The apparatus shown in Figures 1 and 2 is unperturbed. As previously mentioned, background or other vibrations in the area of use can themselves sometimes act as perturbation means and produce undesirable variable results. Figures 3 and 4 show a modified embodiment of the apparatus, wherein the system is not regularly perturbed, but is subject to irregular or noise perturbation, which overrides or masks such background vibration. In Figure 3 the noise source includes an amplifier 30 which applies noise from a resistive or other electrical source 32, to a transducer such as an acoustic horn 34. The horn imparts the noise vibrations to the fluid or the manifold. These random perturbations may be applied to the fluid using prior art transducers; but the perturbation they apply herein is irregular, not regular. In Figure 4, the noise transducer is a set of piezoelectric crystals 40 which are mounted to wall 42 of the fluid manifold 12. Other types of transducers may be used, as known in the art. The difference is that they are operated in a narrow band of random frequencies, nfJt at regular frequencies. It is desirable that the central frequency of the noise anorcX;mata the natural frequency of EMI18.1 droplet #. This is about V/4.51 d cycles per second EMI18.2 wnere d is the jet diameter in inchesH-d V the velocity of the jet in inches per second. The band width is desirably less than about 12,000 cycles/ second, so that the random vibrations are most effective in achieving breakoff. While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures.

Claims: WHAT I CLAIM IS: 1. A liquid jet device for printing, coloring or otherwise treating a receiving substrate placed thereunder comprising means for randomly generating droplets frm a liquid stream, said random generating means having an unlimited cross machine width and being comprised of means defining a source of pressurized liquid and orifice means defining a plurality of jet orifices having a diameter d through which said liquid issues so that droplets are randomly formed having differing sizes and spacings therebetween, said pressure and orifice dimensions being controlled so that droplet break up occurs substantially within a predetermined distribuion around a mean droplet size, electrode means for selectively imparting charges to droplets, collection means for collecting droplets; and deflection means for deflecting the paths of predetermined droplets away from the receiving substrate to said collection means. 2. A liquid jet device fC) applying the liquid to a substrate placed thereunder with a droplet misregistration value less than about 0.9 inch comprising means for randomly generating droplets from a liquid stream, said random generating means including means defining a source of pressurized liquid and orifice means defining a plurality of jet orifices having a diameter d through which said liquid issues so that droplets are randomly formed having differing sizes and spacings therebetween, said pressure and orifice dimensions being controlled so that droplet break up occurs substantially within a predetermined distribution around a mean droplet size, electrode means for selectively imparting charges to droplets, collection means for collecting droplets; and deflection means for deflecting the paths of predetermined droplets away from the receiving substrate to said collection means. 3. A liquid jet device as in claim 1 or 2 wherein said device applies droplets on the substrate at a droplet misregistration value less than about 0.1 inch. 4. A liquid jet device as in any one of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said droplet misregistration value is defined by the expression n (4.51d)V'/V where n equals the number of mean drop spacings a droplet is formed away from the mean breakoff point, d equals the orifice diameter, V equals jet velocity and V' equals the rate of substrate movement. 5. A liquid jet device as in claim 4 wherein d ranges from about 0.00035 inches to about 0.020 inches, n is greater than about 1, V ranges from about 200 to about 3200 inches per second and V' ranges from about 0 to about 480 inches per second. 6. A liquid jet as in claim 5 wherein the pressure ranges from about 2 psig to about 500 psig. 7. A liquid jet device as in claim 5 wherein said orifice is about .004 inches, the pressure ranges from about 2 to-about 30 psig. and the jet velocity is about 400 inches per second. 8. A liquid jet device as in claim 5 wherein said orifice is about .0013 inches, the pressure ranges from about 15 to about 70 psig and the jet velocity is about 800 inches per second. 9. A liquid jet device as in any one of claims 1, 2, 4 or 5, wherein said electrode means has a length parallel to droplet flow which ranges from about 30 to about 300 times the orifice diameter. 10. A liquid jet device as in claim 9 wherein the preferred length of said electrode means is equal to about 100d. 11. A liquid jet device as in claim 9 or 10 wherein the charging voltage applied to said electrode means ranges from about 50 to about 200 volts. 12. A liquid jet device as in any one of claims 1, 2, 4 or 5, wherein thetviscosity of the liquid is less than about 100 cps. 13. A liquid jet device es in any one of claims 1, 2, 4 or 5 wherein said substrate is moved with respect to said orifices at a rate less than about 480 inches per second. 14. A liquid jet device as in any one of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9 or 10 wherein said device is operated at a charging electrode voltage which is at least 1.5 times that of a regularly perturbed apparatus having the same droplet misregistration value. 15. A liquid jet device as in any one of claims 1, 2, 4 or 5 wherein said random generating means operates in the absence of an artificial or external perturbation means for imparting regular cyclical vibrations to said liquid to induce uniform droplet breakup. 16. A liquid jet device as in any one of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 or 10 wherein said substrate is a textile. 17. A liquid jet device as in claim 16 wherein saic' liquid is natural or synthetic textile dyes or colornts or mixtures thereof. 18. A liquid jet device as in any one of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 or 9 further including, a random noise generator which applies irregular, randomly varying vibrations to said liquid, to induce said streams to break up more randomly than in the absence of such irregular vibrations. 19. A liquid jet device as in claim 18 wherein said random noise generator imparts noise of a random frequency having a band width less than about 12,000 cycles per second, to said ink. 20. A liquid jet device as in claim 18 wherein said random noise generator has a central frequency which approximates the natural jet breakoff frequency of said streams. 21. A colored and/or imaged substrate having a width varying from less than about Ojl inch to about 15 feet formed from randomly generated and precisely controlled droplets of a treating liquid, whereby the droplets have been randomly formed from a liquid stream in the absence of artificial or external vibration means so that the droplets have differing sizes and spacings therebetween within a predetermined distribution around a mean droplet size. 22. The substrate as in claim 21 wherein the substrate is a textile product and the treating liquid is a natural or synthetic textile dyes or colorants or mixtures thereof. 23. A process for imprinting indicia on or coloring a substrate with a liquid comprising the steps of: establishing a liquid flow in the form of at least one jet stream by pressurizing a source of liquid and forcing the liquid through at least one oriface and randomly forming that stream into droplets by controlling the pressure and orifice dimensions so that the random droplet breakup occurs substantially within a predetermined distributicn pattern around a mean droplet size, selectively imparting charges to predetermined ones of said droplets, deflecting the path of the charged droplets and collecting the thus deflected droplets, whereby the uncharged droplets are allowed to be deposited on the substrate. 24. A process as in claim 23, wherein the orifice and pressure on the liquid jet are established according to the droplet misregistration equation of n (4.51d) V'/V where n equals the number of mean drop spacings a droplet is formed away from the mean breakoff point, d equals the orifice diameter, V equals jet velocity and V' equals the rate of substrate movement so that drops reaching the substrate have a droplet misregistration value less than about 0.9 inch. 25. A process as in claim 23 or 24 wherein the substrate is indexed in a predetermined manner beneath said droplets. 26. A process as in claim 25 wherein said substrate is moved at a rate less than about 480 inches per second. 27. A process as in claim 23 or 24 wherein the pressure ranges from about 2 psig to about 500 psig. 28. A process as in claim 23 or 24 wherein droplets are applied to the substrate at a droplet misregistration value of less than about 0.1 inches. 29. A process as in any one of claims 23, 24 or 28 wherein the viscosity of the liquid is less than about 100 cps. 30. A process as in any one of claims 23, 24 or 28 including the additional step of generating irregular and randomly varying vibrations and applying such vibrations to the liquid to induce the liquid streams to break up more randomly than in the absence of such irregular vibrations. 31. A process as in claim 30 wherein said randomly generated vibrations are generated at a random frequency having a band width less than about 12,000 cycles per second. 32. A process as in any one of claims 23, 24 or 28 wherein the substrate is a textile and the liquid is natural or synthetic textile dyes or colorants or mixtures thereof.

Inventors: GAMBLIN, ROGER LOTIS
Applicants: BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
Application year: 1982
Main classification: B41J3
IPC codes: B41J2