TOLERANCE LIMITATION MEASURING PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS BASED ON VISUAL EVALUATION OF THE DISPLAYED MEASURING RESULTS

Abstract: The invention concerns a process and apparatus for the determination of the optimal tolerance ranges based on the visual joint evaluation of the technological parameters and product characteristics with microprocessor means, the input devices of which are formed with data inputs adapted to the data sources supplying the technological parameters and product characteristics, and at least one of its signal outputs is coupled to a control input of the video screen display unit, wherein this control input is the brightness and/or colour control input of the image spot and the apparatus has electronic or mechanical level line emitter adapted to the geometry of the screen image - oriented identically with the deflection directions - as well as a control device operated level line shifting device the direction of movement of which is perpendicular to the level line.

Description: TOLERANCE LIrilTATION MEASURING PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR OPTII4IZATION OF TECHNOLOCICAL PARAMETERS BASED ON VISUAL EVALUATION OF THE DISPLAYED INEASURING RESULTS The invention relates to process and tolerance limitation measuring apparatus suitable for realization of the process, whereby it can be determined under more favourable conditions than those known so far, as to what tolerance range is permissible as independent factor in the combination of the process- and condition characteristic parameters (hereinafter: independent factors) to ensure the dependent factorial value within the tolerance range specified for certain qualitative characteristics (hereinafter: dependent factor) of the product obtained as a result of the process in the technological processes characterized with multifactorial technological parameters. Concept of the technological process, product, independent factor and dependent factor is interpreted entirely in general terms. The heat treatment process of a steel plate is mentioned by way cf example, in the course of which the technological condition is reduced to two temperature values to be maintained in two different periods as process characteristics otherwise assuming normal condition characteristic parameters, and with use of the various combinations of the two different temperature values the following are determined: HB hardness value of steel plate as endproduct, searching such tolerance range d x for the first temperature T1 at which the setting of any value within the tolerance range of the second temperature T2 will definitely result in keeping the required HB hardness value within specified tolerance range. The necessity of searching the optimum related to technological processes depending on multi-factorial condition characteristic parameters occurs frequently, and the multi-factorial character allows the optimization only with complicated, time-consuming and labour-intensive iterative operation sequence, consequently the possibility of adequately reliable optimization at lower input has been the subject of search for a long time. Pany experiments have been conducted recently with the microprprocessing of large number of data. As known, the computer is capable to work out the answers only to the entered questions, and the mass of facts can be evaluated only according to the already specified relationship; for this reason the optimum calculations from the multifactorial masses performed strictly by machine are highly input-demanding, yet not sufficiently flexible. Thus the known solutions restrict the computer processing to receiving the measuring results and to convenient data handling, the obtained results are visually displayed as multifactorial image and the displayed image is directly evaluated in interactive connection, thus considerably reducing the sequence of iterative steps concentrating at each step to the most probable solution among the alternative possibilities according to the individual judgement. This way not only the input can be significantly reduced by reducing the number of iterative steps, but the optimum character of the obtained result has a higher probability. In the known solutions by setting the independent factor of the technological process to the experimental value, then altering the setting as necessary, the momentary values of the independent factors are measured continuously or by sample taking, and the dependent factor is measured continuously, by sample taking and/or as final value; the measuring data are processed as necessary with microprocessor, values of the dependent factor correspinding to the different value combinations of the independent factors are determined, the result is displayed on the video screen, the process characteristics are amended as necessary according to the individual visual evaluation of the displayed image, and this operation sequence is repeated as necessary until the searched final result is obtained. The visual evaluation saves many iterative steps, which would not be left out by the machine incapable for idependent thinking in the course of consistent following of the programme. Basically however it is still valid, that the observed image follows the routine course of the mechanical processing and it does not offer basis for comparison between the variations of the interlocked tolerance ranges of the different process characteristics and the resultant variation of the dependent factor. The process according to the inventions allows elimination of this fundamental deficiency, when the observed image does not visualize directly the relationship between the tolerance range variation of the two independent factors and behaviour of the dependent factor in relation to the tolerance range. Elimination of above deficiency is attained according to the invention by calibrating the extent of deflection of the beam on the display unit according to the dimension of the independent factor representing the first technological parameter for instance in horizontal direction and according to the dimension of the independent factor representing the second technological parameter in the other - e.g. vertical - direction, the brightness and/or colour deflection in the image spot (P) of the video screen determined by the deflection according to the given momentary values is controlled according to the value of the dependent factor appearing at certain momentary values of the two factors, and the level ines (e.g. in case of horizontal and vertical deflection: :the corresponding directional centrelines) coinciding with the two directions of deflection are superposed mechanically, or electronically on the displayed image, and by displacement of the level lines independently from each other the lower and upper limit values in both directions of the deflection are determined, when at any possible combination of the independent factors, the brightness and/or colour of the image spot will remain within the possible tolerance range in any point of the limited area. The above described concepts too are understood entirely in general terms, but for the sake of lucidity, the detailed explanation is connected to examples specified with narrower interpretation of the -concepts in the following. Thus for instance the measuring results are frequently represented on the video screen by diagrams shown in Descartes coordinate system, but in case of the Bessel-function diagrams the polar coordinate representation is preferable and conceivable in order to represent the functions in the general curvilinear coordinate system. In the following the detailed explanations will be linked to representation in the Descartes system, calibrating the first independent factor on the x-axis obtained with the horizontal deflection and the second independent factor on the y-axis obtained with the vertical deflection, but the same is valid when the beam 2 of deflection according to the polar coordinate is calibrated for the first independent factor and the angle 9 for the second independent factor, or in case of the general curvilinear coordinate system the first u coordinate is calibrated for the first independent factor and the second v coordinate for the second independent factor. Similarly the dynamic modulation of the image spot is interpreted for two factorial quantity, ther.7icroprocessor drives the brightness for "yes when the value of the dependent factor is within the tolerance range and the image spot is bright at the given spot (or specific co lour), while the output signal of the microprocessor drives for "no" when the value of the dependent factor is outside the tolerance range, the image spot remains dark or normal colour. Obviously this can be achieved if the microprocessor discriminates the measured value of the dependent factor, transmitting it further within the amplitude range in given case, not beyond the range, etc. But in addition to this simple application, the analogue of quantized digital modulation of the brightness is also conceivable, when the brightness or colouration is of multistage within the tolerance range (or even in its vicinity) and the image spot representing the measuring result is divided, shaded in depth similarly to the levels of the map, or different in some other way, e.g. flashing with different frequency, intensity. One of the advantages of the invention compared to the known similar solutions is, that in case of two-factorial modulation the microprocessor is used only for data handling and for the leveldependent selection of the output signal. The mathematical evaluation of the measuring results is not necessary, it is wholly performed by the observing intelligent human being. The advantage of not being restricted to the non-intelligent data handling device can be readily seen by the computer technical expert. The method and extent of superposing the level line can be selected similarly at discretion. When only a vertical and a horizontal rule is -sfiifted, then in the course of examination the lower and upper limit values have to be handled separately. When two level lines are shifted in each direction, then the tolerance range selected by way of trial is directly encompassed, which is highly expressive. Nevetheless it is conceivable that only just majoring or minoring demand may arise, when the sbifting of a single level line in each direction is sufficient. Naturally the level lines can be superposed electronically too - with marker signal mechanism - when the multiplication possibility of the instrument stock is practically unlimited. The division of labour between the mechanical device, observer and computer technical device may also be versatile. When single beam display is used, then - especially with application of time-division multiplex operation mode - the human or computer intervention allows the projection of different patterns by the same beam with time division within the inertia of the eye. It is also conceivable that the same beam plots with time division multiplex control - i.e. at longer persistence time - both the image spots and level lines. Thus even several dependent factors ordered to the deflection corresponding to the independent factors can be plotted side-by-side on the same video screen and in case of single beam no special display unit is needed. When the values of the independent factor are ordered with synchronization to the traditional beam deflection of given direction, i.e. the control mechanism of the micro processor is responsible for the time-correct and resultant position-correct modulation, then a TV apparatus available in the trade can be used as display unit without any special conversion. At the same time the multi-beam display units are also applicable, and the interconnection between the independent factor and deflection of given direction can be established by giving deflection voltage in proportion with the existing independent factor two the corresponding directional control input of the deflecting system. In this case the display unit is a special device, or the control signals are specially coupled, on the other hand the date control system does not require synchronization between the deflecting system and independent factor. In view of the foregoing, the apparatus suitable for realization of the process has many, significantly different alternatives and in one of the extreme cases current building units are converted to a system with the aid of a small adapter, while in another case the equipment is built up from special single-purpose apparatuses according to the existing technological and economic requirements. Any construction of the apparatus according to the invention is characterized in that it has microprocessor, the input devices of which are formed with data inputs adapted to the data source supplying the data of the technological condition, and product characteristics and at least one single output of which is coupled to a control input of the video screen display unit. Such adaptation of the data inputs however can be interpreted also in very general terms. If such adapter is available in the trade which is formed with inputs adaptable to the different data sources, while the output signals are adapted to a certain input signal of the microprocessor, then the apparatus according to the invention needs no such adapter1 but it is sufficient to have a data input adaptable to such adapter available in the trade. Similarly all constructions are characterized in that the said control input coupled to the said signal output of the microprocessor is the brightness control and/or colour control input of the image spot, and the apparatus has electronic or mechanical level line transmitter adapted to the geometry of the video screen - conforming to the deflection directions, and level line shifting device the motion direction of which is perpendicular to tlle level line and operated with control unit. The level line transmitter - as mentioned may be a rule set consisting of two rules perpendicular to each other, each coupled to a carrier trajectory; in this case the carrier trajectory is parallel arranged in front of the video screen. The control unit represents handle(s) or functionally equivalent devices formed on the appropriate places of the rule sets. ore versatile facility is obtained if the level line transmitter is electronic. In a preferable construction the display unit has a single beam and the simultaneous display of the different diagrams is enabled by influencing the multi-factorial time multiplex with the length of time fixed by the eye-inertia of this single beam, when the multiplex operation mode may extend for modulation of the brightness (colour) and for control of the deflecting systems. It is to advantage when the microprocessor is formed to be suitable for the processing and adaptation of at least two different product characteristics, and the device of the microprocessor (hereinafter: typotron) - which transmits title electric signals adapted to the corresponding control input of the display unit and represents the momentary values of the product characteristics - is coupled through the time multiplex operating adapter to the brightness control and/or colour control inputs, said adapter is cOnnected between the output of the typotron and corresponding signal output of the microprocessor, or between the signal output of the microprocessor and brightness control and/or colour control input. Incorporation of the adapter as integral part of the microprocessor, or as input circuit of the display unit, or as not intergral part of the microprocessor or display unit either, but its separate insertion between the two basic units depends on the existing application and adaptation requirements. On the basis of above informations, the experts of display technique and computer technique can vary the concrete formation of the two fundamental building units in many ways within the scope of the usual knowledge, consequently the further detailed description is restricted only to the fundamental process and to some possible constructions given by way of example without rest ricting the invention to these. The further description is supported by diagrams. Figures 1 and 2 show in general the image displayed on the video screen and the possibility of finding the optimal tolerance range, with the difference, that Figure 1. illustrates image spot representing a dependent factor, Figure 2. shows two simultaneously represented image spots, showing two dependent factors representing two qualitative characteristics of the same product in function of the independent factors. Figure 3. shows an image spot alternative for following the variation of the HB hardness value of the already mentioned steel plate according to the independent factors0 figure 4. shows the display unit of the special video screen - level line combination. Figure 5.: diagram showing the measuring instrument and the interconnection of the measuring and data collection apparatuses transmitting the data from the serviced process. Figure 6.: block diagram showing the formation of the electronic system given by way of example. Figure 7.: Formation of the electronic units shown in detail. Figure 8./ Block diagram showing subunits of the XY-video converter. Figure 9.: Functional block diagram of the data arranging unit 501. Figure 10.: Functional block diagram of units 502, 503 and 504, and details of the interconnection methods of the units. Figure 11.: Example showing the display methods of the images for operation of riore than two independent factors. In Figure 1. the first independent factor x and second independent factor y are shown in orthogonal coordinate system. The explanation "mutates mutandis" is valid even when the first independent factor and second independent factor are shown in polar coordinate system, or the first independent factor u and second independent factor v are shown in the curvilinear coordinate system. It was already mentioned, that for the sake of lucidity the description was restricted to such realization mode, where the totality of the image spots representing the value within the tolerance range of the dependent factor (with the same brightness or colour) rises from the rest of the video screen, the brightness or colour of which is according to the normal condition (e.g. dark). The image spot 16 shown in Figure 1 is the geometrical position of all those image spots Pi,k (i and k represent the deflection values in proportion with the momentary value of the first and second independent factor respectively, as coordinate of the spot), and to the values of the independent factors x and y a dependent factor value within the permissible tolerance range is pertinent. Instead of plotting proportionate numerical values expressed in a certain unit on the abscissa and ordinate, certain increasing values are provided with serial number according to the selection. Thus the lowest yl, the ya, yf, y2 and the highest y3 value as well as the lowest xl, xa, x2, xf, x3 and the highest x4 values were projected. It is seen, that in case of setting the value xl of the first independent factor, the value of the dependent factor wil be within the permissible tolerance range only when uti-lue of the second independent factor y is appropriate to point yl,; alteration of any of the independent factors x and y will result in waste product. On the other hand two values x3 and x4 can be ordered to value y3 in order to obtain product of acceptable quality, while only a single value i.e. x2 can be ordered to value y2 representing the local maximum. When the horizontal level lines 14 and 15 and vertical level lines 12 and 13 are shifted to points yf, ya, xa, xf, then they will encompass such two tolerance ranges J y and Ax, within which in case of any y and x value, a product of good quality can be obtained. If the image spots 27 and 28 representing the two different quaZitative characteristics as dependent factor are simultaneously displayed, then overlap of the two image spots 17 and 18 will determine the range of condition characteristic parameters permissible for the product of acceptable quality. As seen, the resultant image spot 19 is shapeless, i.e. it has.irregular shape. By shifting the level lines 22, 23, 24, 25 again such two tolerance ranges y and x are obtained, within which - in case of setting any yk and xi value - a product of good quality can be reckoned with. Naturally with consideration to the other circumstances, the person performing the evaluation may select the range minimum values within the permissible (if too high temperature is undesirable) or the range of maximum values (if temperature below the freezing point is undesirable) and due to the variability of the condition characteristic parameters, several such additional aspects may be arbitrarily considered at the setting by the evaluating person, which can be taken into account by computer only in case of feeding in versatile requirement system in advance. On the basis of above, Figure 3. does not require any special explanation. Naturally the most diversified apparatus alternatives can be constructed for the described measuring process, without the need of changing the essential elements of the process. For instance the display of several independent factorial or dependent factorial images is also possible in a simple way on the video screen side-by-side, or within each other, by adaptation of the known method (according to te principle of the matris- space - subspace relation). Similarly the various images can be displayed in consecutive order. Sequence of the images side-by-side or following each other can be arranged according to further independent factors, giving further opportunity for expansion for the measuring possibilities, since the dimensions of the further independent factors can be directly taken into consideration. Ordering the increasing valies of the independent factors to images side-by-side or following each other, and to consider the dimensions of new independent factors in subspace form at the beam deflection or representation of the dependent factor values, represent no problem. In case of displaying the images side-by-side, different (e.g colour) level lines may be used as independent factor. The uninteresting parts can be deleted from the images by simple discriminations, and this way a clear image is obtained for measuring. The remaining images can be brought side-by-side with routine programmes, whereby the video screen can be utilized more efficiently. The microprocessor can generate level lines of matching position at the images, for which routine programme can be worked out. The rate of consecutive projection of the condition systems in the data system can be examined at a rate offering better view. Routine programmes can be used for enlargement and reduction of image details as well. The usual markerings on the images during transit or in stationary image are possible with marker device, which allows the condensXation of the images showing the solution (omission of images not showing the solution). The transitional images between the images pertaining to the adjacent independent factor combination and to the given dependent factor condition system can be optimally generated with routine programming, and interpolations. Similarly the known image-filtering programmes are applicable on the images,for filtering or marking the faulty solutions, furthermore the summation of images, image details pointby-point with + or - signs is also possible. Thus the utilization of traditional mathematical and computer technical elements expands almost at will the application field of the process and apparatus without restricting the invention with the variations. Figures 4 - 11 show the concrete formation of the process and apparatus by way of examples: Figure 4. shows the video screen with line levels and their control units, as well as arrangement of the scales, display surface and level lines on the video screen in relation to each other. On the video screen 1001-2 the display surface 110 is between scale 101 and orthogonal coordinates determined by scale 102. Level lines 107 and 108 are along scale 101, level lines 105 and 106 are along scale 102. Level lines 107 and 108 can be optimally set along the scale controlled on input a with the pertinent control unit 103 controlled on input d. Level lines 105 and 106 are coupled to control unit 104, functioning from input e, Display surface 110 is coupled with input c, its brightness, colour etc. can be controlled from there. The unit is connected to the other units with its given inputs. The block diagram in Figure 5. shows the connection of the main units for the measuring process. The independent factors are coupled with data collector RK at points K1, K2....Kn with the electric signals of sensors elk, e2k ...enk. The sensors Eli,E2i ... E nk transmit the place, time, etc. identification data of the interdependence of the independent factors and dependent factors to the data collector Rijk connected to points ij ... k. Sensors VIA, V2A ... VUA transmit electric signals \'1A1 V2A uA corresponding to the momentary values and/or final values of the dependent factors to the data collector RA on points A1, A2 ... Asp. Data collectors RK, Risk, RA in given case can be combined in microprocessor system of multiplex operation mode by ensuring the functions. The data input of the tolerance limitation measuring apparatus F is coupled to the outputs l(, ijk, A of data colletcors RK, Rijk, R The tolerance limitation measuring apparatus has further inputs for control of the various functions. The inputs are the following: Ap: dependent factor limitation control input3 Ax or in case of more than two independent factors X x... is the independent factor limitation control input along x; d y or in case of more than two factors fly ... is the independent factor limitation control input along y;. In addition further inputs are used for setting the operation mode of the tolerance limitation measuring apparatus M. These are the following: x = ( ) for determining the x coordinate values; y = ( ) for determining the y coordinate values; Ap = (' ) for determining the coordinates of the dependent factor and independent factor; Ap for determining the dependent factor (k) to be displayed; Vpl for determining the colour and/or brightness codes for each dependent factor; V p2 for determining the display logical function of the dependent factors. The display system shown in Figure 4. is coupled to the servicing electronics at points (x)k); (Y)k); ( Ate3; (tl ... t4), the realization is shown by way of example in Figure 6. Main units of the servicing electronics according to the block diagram : Colour Monitor 200; Ntnitor 300 B and W; Display Processor 400; XY-Video Converter 500. The electronics is shown in detail in Figure 7., such as Display Processor 400, Video Unit 401, Synchron-generator 402, Memory Unit 403 and Interface Unit 404; the XY-Video Cdnverter 500 is coupled to Interface Unit 404 at points "Synch;, AC, X(k), Y(k), t1 ... t4. The functions necessary for the measuring process are performed essentially by the XY-Video Converter 500, the internal buildup of which can be traced in the block diagram shown in Figure 8. The XY-Video Converter consists of the following main units: data arranging unit 501, dependent factor limiter 502, brightness and/or colour coder 503, dependent factor display logical circuit 504; control centre of multiplex operation mode 505; the independent factor level line setting unit ( electronic level line) is necessary in given case. Units of the XY-Video converter 500: K; ijk; x = ( ); y = ( ); A; = ( ); A; A; # AP; Vpl; Up2; and "Sync; in given case they are coupled with inputs #X and tY to the corresponding outputs. Further corresponding inputs of the other units are coupled through outputs (X)k); (Y)k); AAIC; and in given case through tl ... t4 to the units of the XY-Video Converter 500. Unit 501 arranges the data corresponding to inputs 19 and A on inputs x = ( ); y = ( ); Ap = ( ) according to the operating instructions setting in the sequence or arranging into matrices the dependent factorial data according to the dimensions of the independent factors. The scale control 101 is coupled to output x(k) of unit 501, while scale control 102 to output y(k) for display of the corresponding scales on video screen 100Ú-ê. In accordance with the determinations the signals corresponding to the arranged dependent factorial values A1'; #2'; ; A3' are received by the dependent factor limiter unit 502, where these signals as independent factors corresponding to the limit values determined on input AA are transmitted towards the video screen, if p they are within the given appropriate limit values AA Ap, but the signals are not transmitted when they fall outside the given appropriate limit values asp. The brightness and colour coder is coupled to signal outputs (#A1'); (#A2'); (#Ap') etc., which - depending on the determination given to the input Vpl - performs brightness or colour coding at each dependent factor correspunding to a code signal. E.g. colour code #A1'c to #Al' and so on. The bright- ness and colour code signals #Al'c; #A2'C; #Ap'c are transmitted to the dependent factor display logical circuit 504, which according to the determination given to input Vp2 performs selectable logical "AND", logical "OR", "AnD" and t'SYNTHETIZER't functions. The brightness and/or colour signal ss AtC corresponding to the momentary value of the dependent factors appears on the display logical circuit output of the dependent factor 504. Figure 9. shows details of the data arranging unit 501. The independent factorial value appearing on input K is transmitted to storage register 5011 R from where it is requested by sorter unit 5012, in which the dimensions of data K are arranged accord 'ing to dimension x of the beam deflection based on the instructions taken from the register content (x,y,A p' i,j,k) of unit 5018. The so-arranged data are transmitted into the storage register 5013 Rtikx s from there to the output of deflecting unit 5014 X and the signal (Y)k) appears on control of the X-directional scale, The control signal (Y)K) of the y-directional scale is formed in the same way in units 5015, 5016 and 5G17. The dependent factorial values on input A are transmitted to the storage register 50113 RA, from where they are requested by data sorter 5019 A1 and/or 50 A2 and further data sorter(s) 50112 A3, which adapt the dependent factorial data A to x-directional scale and y-directional scale according to the relationship taken from register content F?(x,y,Ap,jjk) of unit 5018. The arranged dependent factorial data are the register contents RAg, RA2, RAP of storage units 50110, 50112, 50114 and the corresponding data system (A1'), (A2'), (Apt) can be taken from there for the further signal processing. Unit 5018 enables the ordering of the various independent and dependent factorial data to each other based on their actual relationship in the technological process, i.e. to adapt them to the x-directional and y-directional scales. Instructions of the actual arrangement can be given in each case according to the purpose of the examination, and the operation mode determining the inputs Ap, x = ( ), y = ( ), Ap = ( ) serue for this purpose, the function of which has already been detailed earlier. Figure 10. shows in detail the structure of units 502, 503 and 504. As seen, the unit 5021 performs discrimination with the assigned by-pass band . Signal ( A11) appears on its output, if its input signal (A11) conforms to the discrimination condition. Essentially the same discrimination applies to the further dependent factors. For instance signal (A2t) is discriminated by unit 5022, -signal (A ') by unit 502p, etc. p The output signals (All), (d A21) ... (Ap') of discriminator units 50Z1, 5022 ... 502 ... etc. p are transmitted to brightness and/or colour coders 5031, 5032 ... 503p, where the brightness and colour coding is performed by the operator on the apprpropriate input Vpl. As a result of the codings the coded signal represents the basis of further operations. Output signals (#Al'c), (#A2'C), db 0 A IC) p drive the dependent factor display logical circuit unit 504. Discrimination stages of unit 503 are set by control unit 5034 "C", which is a control circuit of multiplex operation mode, containing the usual solutions for the expert, with input V pl for determination of the codings. The dependent factor display logical circuit 504 synthetizes the coded signals of the discriminators to a single brightness and/or colour signal combination #A'C for driving the video circuits. For the various measuring process. alternatives the logical circuit 5041 realizes logical "And", the logical circuit 504z realizes logical "Ur", the logical circuit 5043: "Addition" and the logical circuit 5044 realizes combined operation with circuit solutions evident for the expert. The functional setting is performed by control unit 5û45 of multiplex operation ' mode in a way known by the expert, which can be set on input Up2 by determination of the operation mode. For instance the selector switch 5046 is set with 5045, etc. On the basis of above, the measuring is performed with apparatus M in such a way that in the technological processes characterized with multifactorial parametersXthe characteristic momentary values elk, e 2k ... e nk of the independent factors and the corresponding measuring data K1, K2 K n are coupled to input K of the apparatus, the momentary or final values of dependent factors VlAl V2A ... V uA referring to one or several qualitative characteristics of the product obtained as a result of the technological process and the corresponding measuring data A1, A2 ... g p are coupled to input A of apparatus tali, furthermore the momentary or final values of the measuring data Eli, E2j ... E nk etc. serving for identification and correlation of data K and A, and the corresponding signals i, j, ... k are coupled to input ijk of apparatus i. The dependent factors to be displayed on scale 101 along the x-directional deflection are set at operation mode input x = ( ), and the independent factors to bedisplayed on y-directional scale 102 are set at y = ( ). The dependent factors A p to be displayed on the video screen display surface (110) are given. Upl determines which dependent factor should be displayed with what kind of brightness or colour coding. Up2 is used for setting which logical function should synthetize the video signal tAtC. Thereafter the limitation (discrimination) conditions # Ap are given for the dependent factors. The images corresponding to the limitation condi tionsss A p are displayed one after the other, and measuring of the limit values and limitation variations (tolerance limitations) of the dependent factors is performed in the visualized images constructing the measuring diagrams #Ap -dx -y p with the device. In case of more than two independent factors the described measurings are repeated. Suitably the dimension synthetizing modes are varied as shown in Figure 11. Thus all measurements can be performed with images side-by-side and/or in consecutive order according to the determined sequence with consideration to momentary and/or final value combination of all independent factors - dependent factors, while the person performing the examination is capable to evaluate the process in its total interrelation under the most diversified discrimination conditions. Accordingly the "space" of display 110 in Fi gure 11 are divided into sub-spaces 1101 ...1108, etc., and the dependent factorial momentary values in function of the independent factors K1 - K3 are displayed side-by-side and/or in consecutive order according to the values of the further independent factors K2 etc.

Claims: CLAIMS 1. Process for determination as to what tolerance range is permissible as independent factor in the combination of the process and condition characteristic parameters (hereinafter:independent factors) to ensure the dependent factorial value within the tolerance range specified for one, or several qualitative characteristics (hereinafter: dependent factors) of the product obtained as a result of the process, in case of technological processes characterized with multi-factorial technological parameters, in the course of which by setting the independent factors of the technological process to experimental value, then changing the setting as necessary, the momentary values of the independent factors are measured and the dependent factor(sj is/are measured continuously, by sample taking, and/or as final values, by processing the measuring data as necessary with microprocessor the dependent factorial values corresponding to the various value-combinations of the independent factors are determined, the result is displayed on the video screen, the process characteristics are modified as necessary according to the visual evaluation of the displayed image and this process is repeated until the searched final result is obtained, characterized in that the extent of beam deflection is calibrated on the display unit according to the dimension of the independent factor representing at least one technological parameter in one of the - e.g. horizontal directions and according to the dimension of the independent factor representing at least one further technolugical parameter in the other - e.g. vertical - direction, the brightness and/or colour in the image spot of the video screen determined by the deflection according to the given momentary value are controlled according to the value of the dependent factor appearing at a concrete momentary value of above factors, and level lines identically oriented with the two deflection directions (e.g. in case of horizontal and vertical directional deflection: :centrelines of of corresponding direction) are superposed mechanically or electronically on the displayed image, and by changing (hereinafter by shifting) the position of the level lines independently from each other the lower and upper limit values (Xa-xf and/or Ya¯yf) in both directions are determined, within which at any possible combination of the independent factors the brightness and/or colour of the image spot will remain within the permissible tolerance range at any point of the limited area. 2. Process as claimed in claim 1., characterized in that by superposing at least two level lines in each direction, the level lines are shifted as to encompass the experimentally set tolerance range (x, andAy) at the position of the momentary lower and upper limit values (Xa-Xf, and Ya¯yf) in the existing direction. 3. Process as claimed in claim 1. or 2., characterized in that in the deflecting system of the display apparatus one or the other directional deflection is controlled directly with electric signal in proportion with the momentary value of the corresponding independent factor. 4. Apparatus for determination of the optimal tolerance ranges based on the visual joint evaluation of the technological parameters and EMI33.1 product characteristics with microprocessorA the input devices of which are formed with data inputs adapted to the data sources supplying the technological parameters and product characteristics, and at least one of its signal outputs is coupled to a control input of the video screen display unit, characterized in that this control input is the brightness and/or colour control input of the image spot and the apparatus has electronic or mechanical level line emitter adapted to the geometry of the screen image - oriented identically with the deflection directions as well as lt l < s control device operated level line shifting device the direction of movement of which is perpendicular tQ the level line. 5. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4., characterized in that at least further two signal outputs of the microprocessor are coupled directly or indirectly to the input controlling one or the other directional deflection of the deflecting systen of the display unit. 6. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4 or 5., characterized in that the level line emitter is a rule set consisting of at least two rules, each coupled to at least one carrier trajectory, the carrier trajectory is parallel arranged with and in front of the video screen, and the control device is a handle formed on the rule set, or a functionally equivalent device. 7. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4 or 5., characterized in that it has a multi-beam display unit in which the control unit of one of the beams is brightness and/or colour control input coupled with one of the signal inputs of the microprocessor, while one or several further beam brightness control device(s) is/are manually operated devices and further manually operated devices are coupled to units controlling the deflection of further beams in one or the other direction. 8. Apparatus as claimed in claim 7., characterized in that it is formed with a further beam, where manual operating devices in different time division are coupled to each deflection control device of the apparatus. 9. Apparatus as claimed in any of claims 4. - 8., characterized in that the microprocessor is formed and adapted for the processing of at least two different product characteristics, and the device of the microprocessor (hereinafter typotron) which supplies the electric signal(s) adapted to the corresponding control input of the display unit representing the momentary values of these product characteristics is coupled through the time multiplex adapter to the brightness and/or colour control input(s) of the display unit, said adapter is connected between the output of the typotron and corresponding signal output of the microprocessor, or between the corresponding signal output of the microprocessor and the brightness and/or colour control input.

Inventors: TEJFALUSSY, ANDRAS, Tejfalussy, András
Applicants: TEJFALUSSY, ANDRAS
Application year: 1982
Main classification: G01D7
IPC codes: G01D1, G09G5, G01D18