PACKAGING BAGS

Abstract: A packaging bag has an outer layer and an inner layer. The outer layer is a low density ethylene-based polymer or a mixture thereof with an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. The inner layer is a mixture of a high density polyethylene and an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer. This packaging bag has excellent physical properties, e.g. tensile strength and im­ pact resistance, and is suitable for use in the packaging of heavy materials, particularly by an automatic packaging technique.

Description: TITLE: Packaging Bags DESCRIPTION: - The invention relates to packaging bags, and more particularly, to packaging bags which have high stiffness and blocking resistance and are therefore suitable for automatic packaging. Heretofore, heavy-duty bags for packaging granular materials such as rice and wheat, powdery materials such as fertilizer and feed, and angular solid materials such as fowl have been made of low density polyethylene. These heavy-duty bags, however, are limited in their usefulness because of the low mechanical strength of low density polyethylene. In order to compensate for the poor mechanical strength, therefore, itis necessary to increase the film thickness. Particularly, in the case of heavy-duty bags, it is required for the film thick ness to be markedly increased because of their seriously low tensile strength and stiffness. Furthermore, low density polyethylene is not suitable for use in the production of bags for automatic packaging because its stiffness is poor. In recent years, therefore, bags made of a laminated film comprising a high density polyethylene layer and a low density polyethylene layer have been proposed to overcome the above-described problems of conventional bags (see Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Nos 92023/81, 29426/82, and 30994/80). A bag prepared by using a film as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Nos. 92023/81 and 29426/82 is very preferred forpractical use because the seal strength and the film impact strength are high, the tear strength is well balanced, and furthermore, the outer layer is not slippery. However, when the bag is used to accommodate and convey angular heavy materials such as fowl, its film puncture strength, tear strength, impact resistance at low temperatures, and so forth become problems. Also, a bag made of a film as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 30994/80 suffers from disadvantages in that since the inner layer of the bag is made of low density polyethylene, blocking readily occurs and difficulties are encountered in opening the bag and, furthermore, it takes much labour -and time to place materials in the bag because the inner surface is slippery. The invention provides a packaging bag comprising an outer layer and an inner layer, characterised in that the outer layer is a low density ethylene-based polym' r or a mixture thereof with an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, and the inner layer is a mixture of a high density polyethylene and an ethylenen-olefin copolymer. The outer layer of the bag of the invention is made of a low density ethylene-based polymer (hereinafter referred to as "LDPE") or a mixture of LDPE and an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (hereinafter referred to as "EVA"). Various types of LDPE can be used in the invention. Usually they have a density of from 0.91 to 0.94 gram per cubic centimeter (g/cm3), preferably from 0.915 to 0.935 g/cm3. Their melt indexes (MI) are within the range of from 0.3 to 10 grams per 10 minutes (g/10 min) preferably from 0.3 to 4 g/lo min. When MI is-more than 10 g /10 min, the impact resistance is lowered, unsuitably for practical use. On the other hand, when MI is less than 0.3 g/lo min, processability becomes low. The LDPE used includes that produced under high pressure and that produced under low pressure. Examples of such LDPE produced under low pressure include copolymers of ethylene and a -olefins containing from 3 to 12 carbon atoms (e,g. propylene, butene-l, pentene-l, hexene-l, 4-methylpentene-l and nonene-l). The a-olefin unit content of the copolymers is preferably from 1 to 10% by mole. When the outer layer of the present bag is made of a mixture of LDPE and EVA, the mixing ratio of LDPE to EVA is not critical. Usually, however, the ratio of LDPE/EVA is from 10/90 to 95/5 (by weight), with the range of from 60/40 to 90/10 ±by weight) being preferred. If the proportion of EVA is excessively increased, various problems arise; for example, a bag produced by using the resulting resin mixture has acetic acid odour and, furthermore, the surface of the bag excessively loses its smoothness. Such poor surface smoothness causes blocking between bags and makes bags stick to conveying equipments, e.g. a roller and the belt of a belt conveyor, as used in automatic packaging, resulting in a serious reduction in workability. The inner layer of the bag of the invention is made of a mixture of a hrgh density polyethylene (hereinafter referred to as "HDPE") and an ethy1ene--olefin copolymer. Various types of HDPE can be used in the invention. usually they have a density ranging between 0.94 and 0.97 g/cm3, with the range of from 0.945 to 0.965 g/cm3 being preferred. Their melt indexes are within the range of from 0.01 to 1 g/10 min, preferably from 0.02 to 0.2 g/10 min. When MI is more than 1 g/10 min, the mechanical strength, e.g. tensile strength, of the resulting film is undesirably lowered. Various ethylene-a-olefin copolymers can be used in admixture with HDPE. The ethylene-&alpha;-olefin copolymer suitably has a density of from 0.910 to 0.940 g/cm3, preferably from 3 0.915 to 0.935 g/cm , and a MI of from 0.3 to 10 g/10 min, preferably from 0.3 to 4 g/10 min. Preferred examples of a-olefins which can be used in the preparation of the copolymers are those monomers containing from 3 to 12 carbon atoms, such as propylene, butene-l, pentene-l, hexene-l, 4-methylpentene-1, octene-l and nonene-1. The a-olefin unit content of the copolymer is suitably within the range of from 1 to 10% by mole. Of these ethylene-a-olefin copolymers, ethylenepropylene-based copolymer elastomers (hereinafter referred to as "EP") are most suitable. Various types of EP can be used in the invention Those elastomers having a Mooney viscosity of from 40 to 150 are preferred. When the Mooney viscosity is less than 40, the mechanical strength of the resulting film is undesirably lowered. Preferred examples of EP are ethylene-propylene rubber and ethylene-propylene terpolymers containing, as a third component, dienes such as divinylbenzene, 5 -ethylidene-2-norbornene, 1, 4,-hexadiene, dicyclopentadiene and cyclooctadicne. The ratio of HDPE to the ethylene--olefin copolymer is not critical and can be determined appropriately depending on the purpose for which the ultimate bag is used. Usually, however, the ratio of HDPE to the ethylene-a-olefin copolymer is from 95/5 to 50/50 (by weight), with the range of from 90/10 to 60/40 (by weight) being preferred. When the proportion of the ethylene olefin copolymer is less than 5% by weight, the puncture strength and seal strength of the resulting film arereduced, and when a bag prepared by using the film is dropped, it is easily torn. On the other hand, when it is more than 50% by weight, processability becomes low, and a bag prepared by using the resulting film has poor stiffness and is not suitable for practical use. The bag of the invention comprises the above-described outer and inner layers which are laminated on each other. Although the ratio of the thickness of the outer layer to the thickness of the inner layer can be determined depending on the purpose for which the bag is used, it is usually determined within the range of 1/99 to 60/40. When the thickness of the outer layer is more than 608 of the total thickness of the outer and inner layers, the tensile strength and stiffness of the bag are undesirably lowered. On the other hand, when it is less than 1%, the processability thereof becomes difficult. The bag of the invention is usually of the two layer laminated structure consisting of an outer layer and an inner layer. If desired, a three layer laminated structure, including an intermediate layer between the outer and inner layers or having an innermost layer on the inner layer, can be used. The type of the intermediate layer being interposed between the outer and inner layers is not critical and can be determined appropriately depending on the purpose for which the bag is used. Although the type of the innermost layer is not critical as in the case with the intermediate layer, it is preferably made of an ethylene-a-olefin copolymer. Although the properties of the ethylene-a-olefin copolymer are not critical, the density is usually from 0.91 to 0.94 g/cm3 and preferably from 0.915 to 0.935 g/cm3, and MI is from 0.1 to 20 g/10 min and preferably from 0.2 to 10 g/10 min. The a-olefin content of the copolymer is usually within the range of from 1 to 10% by mole. The bag of the invention can be produced by various techniques. For example, feed resin for the outer layer and feed resin for the inner layer are melted and kneaded at usual processing temperature in respective extruders and extruded therefrom, and then both of the resulting extruded resins are introduced into a circular die having double slit to form two layers which are bonded to each other inside the die. Thereafter, the inflation processing of the bonded two layers is performed at a blow ratio of from 2.5 to 8, preferably from 3 to 6, to obtain a tubular two layer film from which the bag of the present invention is produced. The outer layer and inner layer can be bonded together either outside or inside the die. It is preferred, however to bond together the layers inside the die since the bonding strength between the layers can be increased. In producing the bag of the invention, if desired, additives such as pigment, a slip agent, an antioxidant, an antistatic agent and a weather resistance-improving agent may be incorporated into any one or both of the inner and outer layers at any processing step. The bag of the invention having the above described structure is very superior in physical properties such as film puncture strength and tear strength to the conventional bags and, furthewinore, its seal strength and impact resistance at )ow teanperature are very high. Thus the bag of the invention can be used satisfactorily to accommodate therein and transfer heavy materials, particularly hcavy annular materials such as fowl. Moreover, the bag of the invention is reduced in b]ocking properties and has hinh stiffness and, therefore, it is suitable for use in automatic packaging and greatly accelerates packaging efficiency. Furthermore, since the mechanical strength of the bag is great, the thickness of the bag is sufficient to be about 10 to 200 microns and, therefore, a reduction in thickness can be achieved, which is economically advantageous. The invention is illustrated by the following Example. In these Examples, physical tests were carried out according tithe following methods. Impact Resistance: Measured using a film impact tester (manufactured by Toyo Seiki Seisakujo Co. Ltd; specified impact load: 30 kg.cm; impact hammer diameter 25.4 mm) Puncture Strength: Measured according to JIS-Z-8401. Tear Strength: Measured according to JIS-Z-1702. Tensile Modulus: Measured according to JIS-Z-1702. Tensile Strength: Measured according to JIS-Z-1702. Elongation: Measured according to JIS-Z-1702. Seal Strength: Measured according to ASTH-D-1822. Practical Drop Test: A bag was charged with 20 kg of chemical fertilizer and dropped on a concrete floor from a height of 2.5 meters in such a manner that the broad bag surface was horizontal to the floor. The bag -breakage ratio (number of broken bags/number of dropped bags) was determined. Processability: By observing the continuous operation condition in.processing a two layer film by an inflation method, the processability was evaluated on a numeric scale as follows: 3 ... Excellent, i.e. continuous operation can be performed stably for more than one week. 2 .. Good, i.e. continuous operation can be performed for 1 to 6 days. 1 .. Fair, i.e. continuous operation can be performed for 3 to 24 hours. Appearance: Evaluated by observing with the eye. Blocking: Evaluated by examining whether or not the inner surfaces of a bag closely stick to each other in opening the bag after the production Thereof. 3 ... The bag can be opened with ease. 2 ... The bag can be opened with slight difficulty. EXAMPLES 1 to 16 Feed resin for an inner layer and feed resin for an outer layer as shown in Table 1 were melted and kneaded in the respective extruders and extruded therefrom, and thereafter, both of the resulting extruded resins were introduced into a circular die having double slit to form two layers which were bonded to each other inside the die. Then, inflation processing was performed at a blow ratio of 4.3 to obtain a tubular two layer film in which the ratio in thickness of the inner layer to the outer layer was 4:1 and the total thickness was 80 microns. From this tubular film was produced a bag having a width of 500 mm and a length of 620 mm wherein one end of the bag was heat-sealed. Physical tests were carried out on the bags, and the results are shown in Table 1. In Table 1, the plastics materials are identified by single letters as follows: A: High-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 0.934 g/cm3 and a MI of 3 g/10 min. B: High-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 0.926 g/cn3 anc a unit of 0. g/10 min. C: High-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 0.921 g/cm3 and a MI of 0.6 g/10 min. D: High-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 0.917 g/cm3 and a MI of 8 g/10 min. E: High-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 924 g/cm3 and a MI of 3 g/10 min. F: Low-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 0.921 g/e ,a MI of 3.7 g/10 min, and a C8 &alpha;-olefin content of 10.3% by weight. G: EVA having a density of 0.94 g/cm3, a MI of 0.6 g/10 min, and a vinyl acetate content of 15% by weight. H: HDPE having a density of 0.954 g/cm3 and a MI of 0.05 g/10 min. I: Ethylene-propylene copolymer having a Mooney viscosity ML1+4(1000C) of 60, and a propylene content of 27% by weight. J: Ethylene-propylene terpolymer having a Mooney viscosity ML1+4 (1000C) of 90 and a propylene content of 28E by weight. K: Ethylene-propylene terpolymer having a Mooney viscosity ML1+4 (1000C) of 105 and a propylene content of 43% by weight. L: Ethylene-propylene terpolymer having a Mooney viscosity ML1+4 (1000C) of 42 and a propylene content of 43% by weight. EXAMPLES 17 and 18 The bags of Examples 3 and 4 respectively were charged with 20 kilograms (kg) each of chemical fertilizer, were allowed to stand one day and night in a room maintained at -200C, and then were subjected to the practical drop test to determine the bag breakage ratio. In Example 17 the bag breakage ratio was 15%, whilst the bag breakage ratio in Example 18 was 0%. Table 1 Streng@h of Bag Impact Puncture Tear Tensile Tensile Elongation Inner Layer Outer Layer Resist- Strength Strength Modulus Strength MD/TD ance kg.cm MD/TD MD/TD MD/TD % HDPE EP LDPE EVA kg.cm kg.cm kg/cm kg/cm@ Example Type wt% Type wt% Type wt% Type wt % 1 H 95 J 5 B 100 - 13.0 13.0 22/@5 7430/7400 390/400 460/510 2 H 90 J 10 B 100 - 13.0 48.0 40/80 6600/6890 380/400 540/500 3 H 80 J 20 B 100 - 13.0 96.0 67/110 4810/4960 370/360 540/500 4 H 70 J 30 B 100 - 14.0 112.0 90/110 3680/3820 350/360 570/520 5 H 60 J 40 B 100 - 15.0 148.0 120/110 3000/3200 340/330 580/550 6 H 50 J 50 B 100 - 16.0 165.0 130/110 2500/2700 330/320 580/550 7 H 80 J 20 C 100 - 12.0 90.0 50/90 5300/5600 370/430 510/460 8 H 80 J 20 A 100 - 11.0 48.0 40/70 5320/5680 370/420 500/450 9 H 80 J 20 E 100 - 11.8 48.0 45/70 5300/5700 370/425 500/460 10 H 80 J 20 D 100 - 10.0 40.0 40/@0 5400/5500 370/390 510/490 11 H 80 J 20 F 100 - 11.5 60.0 50/70 5300/5800 370/400 510/490 12 H 80 K 20 A 100 - 11.5 50/70 5320/5680 370/440 500/480 13 H 80 L 20 A 100 - 11.0 54.0 60/70 5300/5700 340/390 510/500 14 H 80 I 20 A 100 - 11.0 54.0 37/71 5780/5960 360/360 560/620 15 H 80 I 20 B 100 - 13.0 60.0 60/90 5120/5330 349/330 540/440 16 H 80 J 20 A 90 G 10 11.0 60.0 45/65 5400/5560 390/430 500/440 Table 1 (continued) Seal Practical Drop Test Processability Appearance Blocking Strength (Bag Breakage Ratio) Example kg.cm (%) 1 2.0 40 3 good 3 2 4.0 15 3 good 3 3 > 4.0 0 3 good 3 4 > 4.0 0 3 good 3 5 > 4.0 0 2 good 3 6 > 4.0 0 1 good 3 7 4.0 0 3 good 3 8 4.0 5 3 good 3 9 4.0 5 3 good 3 10 4.0 25 2 good 3 11 4.0 0 3 good 3 12 4.0 0 3 good 3 13 4.0 0 3 good 3 14 3.5 5 3 good 3 15 3.5 5 3 good 3 16 4.0 5 2 good 3 EXAMPLES 19 to 23 Feed resin for an outer layer and feed resin for an inner layer as shown in Table 2 were melted and kneaded in the respective extruders and extruded therefrom, and thereafter, both of the resulting extruded resins were introduced into a circular die having double slit to form two layers which were bonded to each other inside the die. Then, inflation processing was performed at a blow ratio of 4.3 to obtain a tubular two layer structure film in which the ratio in thickness of the outer layer to the inner layer was 1:4 and the total thickness of the two layers was 50 microns. One end of the tubular two layer structure film was heat-sealed to produce a packaging bag having a width of 340 mm and a length of 570 mm. The bag thus produced was subjected to various physical tests. The results are shown in Table 2. In Table 2 the plastics materials are identified by single letters as follows: M: High-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 0.924 g/cm3 and a MI of 3.0 g/10 min. N: Ethylene-octene-l copolymer having a density of 0.922 g/cm3 and a MI of 2.3 g/10 min. 0: Low-pressure-produced HDPE having a density of 0.955 g/cm3 and a MI of 0.05 g/lo min. Table 2 Inner Layer Tenmsile Characterisrtics Tear Impact Puncture Strength Resistance Strength Outer Layer O N Tensile Tensile Elonga MD/TD (kg.cm) (kg.cm) (wt%) (wt%) Strength Modulus tion MD/TD MD/TD MD/TD Example (kg/cm2) (kg/cm2) (%) (kg/cm) 19 M 90 10 440/460 8000/8400 420/460 11.2/58.2 16.2 50 20 M 80 20 439/458 7220/8190 410/510 14.3/82.2 14.4 60 21 M 70 30 421/439 6180/6720 440/560 20.6/77.5 13.4 65 22 M 60 40 409/415 5210/6300 460/580 29.3/99.3 13.1 68 23 N 70 30 400/440 6200/6500 460/580 22.4/91.0 13.3 70 Table 2 continued Example Seal Practical Blocking Processability Strength Drop Test Resistance (kg.cm) (bag breakage ratio) 19 2.0 3/10 3 3 20 3.5 0/10 3 3 21 7.0 0/10 3 3 22 7.5 0/10 3 3 23 7.0 0/10 3 3 EXAMPLES 24 and 25 Feed resin for an innermost layer, feed resin for an inner layer, and feed resin for an outer layer as shown in Table 3 were melted and kneaded in the respective extruders and extruded therefrom, and thereafter, the three resulting extruded resins were introduced into a circular die to form three layers which were bonded to each other inside the die. Then, inflation processing was performed at a blow ratio of 4.3 to obtain a 50 -micron thick three layer laminated film. The laminated film thus produced was subjected to the same physical testincr5 as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 3. In Table 3 the plastics materials are identified by single letters as follows: P: Ethylene-butene-l copolymer having a density of 0.921 g/cm3, a MI of 3.7 g/10 min and a butene-l content of 7.556 by weight. Q: High-pressure-produced LDPE having a density of 0.924 g/cm3 and a MI of 3.0 g/10 min. R: HDPE having a density of 0.954 g/cm3 and a MI of 0.05 g/min. S: Ethylene-propylene rubber having a Mooney viscosity ML1+4 (100 C) of 60 and a propylene unit content of 27% by weight. Table 3 Inner Layer Ratio of Tensile Characteristics R Ethylene- Layer Tensile Tensile Elongation (wt%) -&alpha;-Olefin Thickness* Strength Modulus MD/TD Copolymer MD/TD MD/TD (%) Example Innermost (wt%) Outer Layer (kg/cm2) (kg/cm2) 24 P 70 P 30 Q 3:6:1 355/420 6000/6500 550/600 25 P 85 S 15 P 3:6:1 350/430 5500/5800 580/600 Table 3 (continued) Example Tear Puncture Seal Blocking Processability Strength Strength Strength Resistance MD/TD (kg.cm) (kg.cm) (kg/cm) 24 30.0/75.0 57.5 6.0 0 0 25 35.0/60.0 60.0 7.0 0 0 * Ratio in thickness of innermost layer to inner layer to outer layer.

Claims: ClAIMS: 1. A packaging bag comprisin an outer layer and an inner layer, characterised in that the outer layer is a low density ethylene-based polymer or a mixture thereof with an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, and the inner layer is a mixture of a high density polyethylene and an ethylene-o-olefin. 2. A bag according to claim 1 characterised in that the low density ethylene-based polymer has a density of from 0.91 to 0.94 gram per cubic centimeter and a melt index of from 0.3 to 10 grams per 10 minutes. 3. A bag according to claim 1 or claim 2 characterised in that the low density ethylene-based polymer is an ethylene homopolymer or a copolymer of ethylene and an a-olefin containing from 3 to 12 carbon atoms. 4. A bag according to any preceding claim characterised in that the outer layer comprises from 10 to 95% by weight of the low density ethylene-based polymer and from 90 to 5% by weight of the ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. 5. A bag according to any preceding claim characterised in that the high density polyethylene has a density of from 0.94 to 0.97 gram per cubic centimeter and a melt index of from 0.01 to 1 gram per 10 minutes. 6, A bag according to any preceding claim characterised in that the ethylene-a-olefin copolymer of the inner layer is an ethylene-propylene-based elastomer. 7. A bag according to any preceding claim characterised in that the inner layer comprises from 95 to 50% by weight of the high density polyethylene and from 5 to 50% by weight of the ethylene-Q-olefin copolymer. 8. A bag according to any preceding claim characterised in that the ratio in thickness of the outer layer to the inner layer is from 1/99 to 60/40. 9. A bag according to any preceding claim characterised in that the bag further comprises an intermediate plastics layer between the inner and outer slayers. 10. A bag according to any of claims 1 to 8 characterised in that the bag further comprises an innermost plastics layer on the face of the inner layer opposite to the outer layer.

Inventors: KAWAMURA, SHINJI, MIHARA, YOSHIYUKI, YAEO, KENTA
Applicants: IDEMITSU PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY LIMITED
Application year: 1982
Main classification: B32B27
IPC codes: B32B27