USE OF DINITROPHENOL COMPOUNDS AS HERBICIDE ANTIDOTES, COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THE ANTIDOTES AND SEED COATED THEREWITH

Abstract: Compounds having the formula in which R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and lower alkyl having 1-4 carbon atoms, inclusive, are useful as antidotes for thiocarbamate herbicides, and may be applied on their own or in admixture with the herbicide. Seeds may be coated with the antidotes.

Description: Title Use of dinitrophenol compounds as herbicide antidotes, compositions containing the antidotes and seeds coated therewith. This invention relates to the use of certain dinitrophenol compounds as herbicide antidotes and to compositions containing said herbicides. A herbicide is a compound which controls or modifies plant growth, e.g. killing, retarding, defoliating, desiccating, regulating, stunting, tillering, stimulating, and dwarfing. The term "plant" refers to all physical parts of a plant, including seeds, seedlings, saplings, roots, tubers, stems, stalks, foliage, and fruits. "Plant growth" includes all phases of development from seed germination to natural or induced cessation of life. Herbicides are generally used to control or eradicate weed pests. They have gained a high degree of commercial success because it has been shown that such control can increase crop yield and reduce harvesting costs. The most popular methods of herbicide application include: pre-plant incorporation into the soil; in-furrow application to seeds and surrounding soil; pre-emergence surface treatment of seeded soil; and post-emergence treatment of the plant and soil. A manufacturer. of an herbicide generally recommends a range of application rates and concentrations calculated to maximize weed control. The range of rates varies from approximately 0.01 to 50 pounds per acre (0.0112 to 56 kilograms per hectare (k/ha)), and is usually in the range of from 0.1 to 25 pounds per acre (0.112 to 28 k/ha). The term "herbicidally effective amount" describes the amount of an herbicide compound which controls or modifies plant growth. The actual amount used depends upon several considerations, including particular weed susceptibility and overall cost limitations. The most important factor influencing the usefulness of a given herbicide is its selectivity towards crops. In some ceses, beneficial crop is susceptible to the effects of the herbicide. In addition, certain herbicidal compounds are phytotoxic to some seed species but r.ct to others. To be effective an herbicide rust cause minimal damage (preferably no damage) to the beneficial crop while maximizing damage to weed species which plague that crop. To preserve the beneficial aspects of herbicide use any to minimize crop damage, many herbicide antidotes have been prepared. These antidotes reduce or eliminate damage to the crop without substantially impairing the damaging effect of the herbicide on weed species; See, for example, U. S. Patent Nos. 4,021,224 and 4,021,229 and Belgian Patent No. 846,894. The precise mechanism by which an antidote reduces herbicidal crop injury has not teen established. An antidote compound may be a remedy, interferent, protectant, or antagonist. As used, "antidote" describes z compound which has the effect of establishing herein cide selectivity, i.e., continued herbicidal phytotoxicity to weed species and reduced or non-phytotoxicity to cultivated crop species. The ter. "antidctally effective amount describes the amount of an antidote compound which counteracts a phytotoxic response of a bene- ficial crcp to an herbicide. Thiocarbamate herbicides are particularly effective in the control of grassy type weeps which interfere with the cultivation of 2 wide variety of crops, e.g., barley, corn, lentils, peanuts, peas, potatoes, soybeans, spinach, tobacco and tomatoes. Frequently the effective use. of these herbicides requires the addition of an antidote compound. It has now been discovered that certain dinitrophenol com- pounds are effective antidotes for the protection of crops from thic- carbamate herbicide injury. Such compounds have the following formula: EMI3.1 in which R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and lower alkyl having 1-4 carbon atoms, inclusive. The carbon range is inclusive of both upper and lower limits. Exemplary of alkyl is methyl, ethyl, and the like. In a preferred embodiment, R is hydrogen or methyl. This invention also embodies a two-part herbicidal system conprised of: (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarb2zate compound of the formula EMI3.2 in which R1 is alkyl having 1-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; R2 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl having 1-5 carbon atoms, inclusive; and cyclohexyl; or R1 and R2 form indistinguishable parts of a single alkylene ring having 4-10 carbon atoms, inclusive; and R3 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl having 1-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; haloalkyl wherein halo is selected from the group consisting of chlorine, bromine and iodine and alkyl has 1-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; alkenyl having 2-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; haloalkenyl wherein halo is selected from the group consisting of chlorine, bromine and iodine, and alkenyl has 2-5 carbon atoms, inclusive; benzyl; and halo-substntuted benzyl, wherein halo is selected from the group consisting of chlorine, bromine and iodine; and (b) a non-phytotoxic antidotally effective amount of a compound of the formula EMI4.1 in which R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and lower alkyl having 1-4 carbon atoms, inclusive. By way of exemplification, the active thiocarbamate herbicides employed in the invention m3y include the following: Methyl N,N-dipropyl thiocarbamate, S-ethyl N,N'-diisobutyl thiocarbamate, Spropyl N,5-dipropyl thiocarbamate, S-propyl-N- butyl-N-ethylthiocarba- mate, S-(2,3,3-tri- chloroallyl)diisopropyl thiocarbamate, S-ethyl N-ethyl N-cyclohexyl thiocarbamate, S-benzyl N"N-disec-butylthiolcarb - mate, S-(4-cholorobenzyl) N,N-diethyl thiocarbamate and combinations thereof. This invention also includes the method of establishing herbicidal selectivity which comprises applying to the locus where protec- tion is desired an antidotally effective amount of a compound of the formula EMI4.2 in which R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and lower alkyl having 1-4 carbon atoms, inclusive. The locus where selectivity is desired may include soil, seeds, seedlings, and vegetation. Preparation The thiocarbamates of the present invention are either corn mercially available or can be prepared by the procedures described in U.S. Patent Nos. 2,913,327; 2,983,747; 3,133,947; 3,185,720; and 3,198,786. The dinitrophenol compounds of this invention are e commercially available. The compounds tested appear in Table I. TABU I DINITROPHENOL COMPOUNDS EMI5.1 Antidote No. R Chemical Name 1 H 2,4-dinitrophenol 2 CH3 2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol Testing Stock solutions of the herbicides were prepared by diluting the requisite amount of each herbicide in water. Examples of solution compositions and application rates are summarized in Table II. TABLE II Herbicide Stock Solutions Composition Herbicide Water Application Herbicide Name (mg)* (ml) ml/flat** Do/acre VERNAM 6E S-propyl-N,N- 197 100 10 4 dipropyl thiocarbamate * The weight is measured in terms of mg of formulated herbicide. The VERNAMs 6E formulation contains 75% active herbicide compound. The weight of active herbicide compound is 148 mg. ** The flats measure 6.0 inches by 8.5 inches. Three and seven-tenths (3.7) mg/flat is equal to one (1) lb/acre. In each case, the herbicide was incorporated into the soil prior to planting. Stock solutions of each antidote compound were prepared at the desired concentrations by diluting the requisite amounts of each antidote in acetone or in a 50-50 acetone/water solution. Examples of solution compositions, rates and application methods are summarized in Table III. TABLE III Antidote Stock Solutions Antidote: Dinitrophenols Composition Application Antidote tmg) Acetone (S1) Water (ml) mI/flat lb/acre Method 222 30 30 6 6.00 PPI* 20 2 - 0.2 ml/10 g - 0.02% ST seed - 18 seeds (about 3.6 g of seed) were planted/flat *PPI = Pre-plant incorporation. **ST = Seed treatment. The antidote solutions were applied to the soil by pre-plant incorporation or by seed treatment. When the antidote was applied by pre-plant incorporation, the herbicide solution and the antidote solution were added to the soil while the soil was being mixed. Ashen the antidote was applied by seed treatment, the herbicide solution was incorporated into the soil, the herbicide treated soil was spread in a flat and the treated seeds were planted in the soil. Treated seeds were prepared by adding the necessary amount of an antidote stock solution to 10 g of seed in a flask. The flask was shaken to insure total seed coverage. The treated seeds were placed in Petri dishes and placed in a hood to dry. As an alternative, the seeds may be treated by adding the dinitrophenol compounds of this invention to a fungicide such as CAPIANa or TIMI, , and coating the seeds with the powder mixture. The seed treatment rate is shown as a percentage of the weight of antidote used per weight of seed used. Untreated control flats contained crops which were not treated with either herbicide or antidote. Some flats contained crops treated with herbicide only. All flats were placed cn greenhouse benches where temperature was maintained between 70 and 90 ? (21.1 to 32.2 C). The flats were watered by sprinkling as needed to assure good plant growth. Injury ratings were taken two to four weeks after application of the antidote. The effectiveness of the antidote was determined by visual comparison of crop injury which occurred in the test flats to that which occurred in the control flats. The soybeans screened for diminution of herbicidal injury included Bragg, Amsoy, Williams, and Corsoy varieties. The other crops included alfalfa, Ventura lima beans, Fordhook lima beans, pinto beans, kidney beans, sugar beets and tomatoes. The weed species tested included watergrass (Echinochloa crusgnlli), foxtail (Setaria viridis), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and mustard (Brassica juncea). KEY TO TABBIES IV ASS V Antidotes in these tables correspond to the numbers and their chemical description in Table I. Herbicides VERNAM# - S-propyl N,N-di-propyl thiocarbamate EPTAM# -S-ethyl N,N-di-propyl thiocarbamate SULTANS - Methyl N,N-di-isobutyl thiocarbamate TILLAM# - S-propyl N-butyl-N-ethyl thiocarbamate Application Methods PPI = Pre-plant incorporation ST = Seed treatment. If no antidote was applied, the word "none" appears in the Antidote Rate column. The results shown on this line are the percent injuries sustained by each of the crops when treated with the herbicide only at the rate specified. All rates shown for pre-plant incorporated herbicide or antidote are in pounds per acre. The seed treatment rate is shown as a percentage of antidote weight to seed weight. Injury Ratings The injury to the soybean crops (Table IV), other crops (Table V) or weeds (Table VI) is shown as a percentage of damage done to the plants as compared to the undamaged state of the plants as shown by the untreated control. The damage done to the plants is a function of the number of plants injured and the extent of injury to each plant. This rating is made two (2) to four (4) weeks after application of the herbicide alone or of the herbicide in combination with the antidote. An asterisk (*) in Table IV or Table V indicates that the antidote compound is active in reducing herb tidal injury to the crop. Table VI shows that the antidote compounds tested have no effect on weeds, i.e., herbicidal injury to the weeds is sustained even in the presence of an antidote compound. TABLE IV Antidotal Effectiveness Anti- Antidote Soybean Varieties dote Herb. Antidote Appln Bragg Amsoy Williams Corsoy No. Herbicide Rate Rate Method % Inj % Inj % Inj % Inj 1 VERNAM 2.00 none - 50 50 VERNAM 2:00 1:00 PPI * 5 * 5 VERNAM 2.00 2.00 PPI * 5 * 5 VERNAM 2.00 3.00 PPI * 0 * 0 VERNAM 2.00 none - 50 50 VERNAM 2.00 0.0025% ST * 5 *20 VERNAM 2.00 0.02% ST * 0 *10 VERNAM 3.00 none - 30 40 45 VERNAM 3.00 1.00 PPI *12 *27 *10 VERNAM 3.00 2.00 PPI *02 * 5 * 0 VERNAM 3.00 3.00 PPI * 5 *15 * 5 VERNAM 3.00 none - 60 60 VERNAM 3.00 0.0025% ST *10 *25 VERNAM 3.00 0.02% ST * 0 *10 VERNAM 4.00 none - 30 70 VERNAM 4.00 1.00 PPI *10 70 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI * 5 *15 VERNAM 4.00 3.00 PPI * 5 *15 VERNAM 4.00 4.00 PPI * 0 * 5 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI *10 *20 VERNAM 4.00 12.00 PPI 100 100 VERNAM 4.00 none - 30 60 70 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI * 5 *10 * 5 VERNAM 4.00 none - 85 92 96 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI *13 *21 *26 VERNAM 4.00 3.00 PPI * 2 * 6 *13 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI * 2 * 2 *10 VERNAM 4.00 none - 45 55 VERNAM 4.00 0.0025% ST * 0 * 5 VERNAM 4.00 0.005% ST * 2 *10 VERNAM 4.00 0.01% ST *17 *12 VERNAM 4.00 0.02% ST * 0 * 0 VERNAM 4.00 0.04% ST 70 *20 VERNAM 4.00 0.08% ST 80 90 VERNAM 6.00 none - 71 93 99 VERNAM 6.00 2.00 PPI *10 *45 *45 VERNAM 6.00 3.00 PPI *12 *41 *38 VERNAM 6.00 4.00 PPI *11 *24 *39 VERNAM 6.00 6.00 PPI * 3 *11 *11 TABLE IV (continued) Anti- Antidote Soybean Varieties dote Herb. Antidote Appln Bragg Ansoy Williams Corsoy No. Herbicide Rate Rate Method % Inj % Inj % Inj % In EPTAM 2.00 none - 70 70 EPTAM 2.00 3.00 PPI *25 *45 EPTAM 2.00 6.00 PPI *10 *40 EPTAM 2.00 none - 70 70 EPTAM 2.00 0.002% ST * 0 *30 EPTAM 3.00 none - 60 - 80 80 EPTAM 3.00 2.00 PPI *35 *60 *60 EPTAM 3.00 3.00 PPI *45 *55 *55 EPTAM 3.00 none - 75 75 EPTAM 3.00 0.02% ST *15 *45 SUSAN 2.00 none - 65 60 SUTAN 2.00 3.00 PPI *10 *20 SUTAN 2.00 6.00 PPI *2 *30 SUTAN 2.00 none - 65 60 SUTAN 2.00 0.02% ST * 5 *15 SUTAN 3.00 none - 70 85 80 SUTAN 3.00 2.00 PPI *50 *45 *5 SUTAN 3.00 3.00 PPI *50 *55 *50 SUTAN 3.00 none - 65 55 SUTAN 3.00 0.02% ST *15 *35 2 VERNAM 4.00 none - 30 60 - 70 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI * O <RTI ID=10.9> * 5 * 5 VERNAM 4.00 none - 85 92 96 VERNAM 4.00 1.00 PPI *13 *42 *12 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI * 9 *11 * 1 VERNAM 4.00 3.00 PPI * 7 *31 *23 VERNAM 4.00 4.00 PPI * 3 *11 * 2 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI * 5 *12 *20 VERNAM 4.00 12.00 PPI *64 *80 100 VERNAM 6.00 none - 71 93 99 VERNAM 6.00 2.00 PPI *28 *52 *28 VERNAM 6.00 3.00 PPI *17 *49 * 9 VERNAM 6.00 4.00 PPI *16 *51 *16 VERNAM 6.00 6.00 PPI *12 *24 * 3 TABLE V Antidotal Effectiveness Anti- Antidote Ventura Fordhook dote Herb. Appln. Antidote Lima Lima Pinto Kidney Sugar No. Herbicide Rate Rate Method Alfalfa Beans Beans Beans Beans Beets Tomatoes 1 VERNAM 3.00 none - 60 VERNAM 3.00 1.00 PPI 80 VERNAM 3.00 2.00 PPI *40 VERNAM 3.00 3.00 PPI 70 EPTAM 3.00 none - 90 EPTAM 3.00 2.00 PPI *80 EPTAM 3.00 3.00 PPI 96 EPTAM 3.00 none - 50 100 0 0 90 30 EPTAM 3.00 2.00 PPI 95 *95 10 15 *80 30 EPTAM 3.00 4.00 PPI 50 *80 0 0 * 0 * 0 EPTAM 3.00 6.00 PPI 70 *50 20 20 * 0 *10 EPTAM 6.00 none - 80 90 10 95 95 90 EPTAM 6.00 2.00 PPI 80 90 * 0 * 0 99 *20 EPTAM 6.00 4.00 PPI 80 90 * 0 * 0 *20 *10 EPTAM 6.00 6.00 PPI 100 100 20 *20 * 0 *10 SUTAN 3.00 none - 75 SUTAN 3.00 2.00 PPI *50 SUTAN 3.00 3.00 PPI 75 TILLAM 3.00 none - 75 50 30 0 0 60 10 TILLAM 3.00 2.00 PPI 60 95 0 0 60 * 0 TILLAM 3.00 4.00 PPI *20 95 20 30 * 0 * 0 TILLAM 3.00 6.00 PPI 50 *20 0 0 * 0 * 0 TILLAM 6.00 none - 100 95 10 0 80 50 TILLAM 6.00 2.00 PPI *20 *20 20 10 * 0 * 0 TILLAM 6.00 4.00 PPI *10 * 0 * 0 0 * 0 * 0 TILLAM 6.00 6.00 PPI * 0 * 0 * 0 0 * 0 * 0 TABLE VI Herbicidal Effectiveness Anti- Antidote dote Herb. Antidote Appln. Water Fox- Velvet Yellow No. Herbicide Rate Rate Method grass tail leaf nutsedge Mustard 1 VERNAM 2.00 none - 65 VERNAM 2.00 1.00 PPI 65 VERNAM 2.00 2.00 PPI 65 VERNAM 2.00 3.00 PPI 60 VERNAM 2.00 none - 65 VERNAM 2.00 0.0025% ST 85 VERNAM 2.00 0.02% ST 85 VERNAM 3.00 none - 95 VERNAM 3.00 1.00 PPI 97 VERNAM 3.00 2.00 PPI 97 VERNAM 3.00 3.00 PPI 97 VERNAM 3.00 none - 70 VERNAM 3.00 0.0025% ST 75 VERNAM 3.00 0.02% ST 80 VERNAM 4.00 none - 96 VERNAM 4.00 1.00 PPI 96 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI 96 VERNAM 4.00 3.00 PPI 96 VERNAM 4.00 4.00 PPI 96 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI 96 VERNAM 4.00 12.00 PPI 96 VERNAM 4.00 none - 96 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI 96 TABLE VI (continued) Anti- Antidote dote Herb. Antidote Appln. Water Fox- Velvet Yellow No. Herbicide Rate Rate Method grass tail leaf nutsedge Mustard 1 VERNAM 4.00 none - 90 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 4.00 3.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 6.00 none - 95 VERNAM 6.00 2.00 PPI 96 VERNAM 6.00 3.00 PPI 95 VERNAM 6.00 4.00 PPI 95 VERNAM 6.00 6.00 PPI 95 EPTAM 2.00 none - 80 EPTAM 2.00 3.00 PPI 80 EPTAM 2.00 6.00 PPI 90 EPTAM 2.00 none - 80 EPTAM 2.00 0.02% ST 75 EPTAM 3.00 none - 96 EPTAM 3.00 2.00 PPI 96 EPTAM 3.00 3.00 PPI 98 EPTAM 3.00 none - 93 EPTAM 3.00 0.02% ST 96 SUTAN 2.00 none - 92 SUTAN 2.00 3.00 PPI 95 SUTAN 2.00 6.00 PPI 90 TABLE VI (continued) Anti- Antidote dote Herb. Antidote Appln. Water Fox- Velvet Yellow No. Herbicide Rate Rate Method grass tail leaf nutsedge Mustard 1 SUTAN 2.00 none - 92 SUTAN 2.00 0.02% ST 85 SUTAN 3.00 none - 80 SUTAN 3.00 2.00 PPI 75 SUTAN 3.00 3.00 PPI 85 SUTAN 3.00 none - 95 SUTAN 3.00 0.02% ST 90 2 VERNAM 4.00 none - 96 90 70 20 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI 96 90 100 60 VERNAM 4.00 none - 90 VERNAM 4.00 1.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 4.00 2.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 4.00 3.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 4.00 4.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 4.00 6.00 PPI 90 VERNAM 4.00 12.00 PPI 97 VERNAM 6.00 none - 95 VERNAM 6.00 2.00 PPI 95 VERNAM 6.00 3.00 PPI 95 VERNAM 6.00 4.00 PPI 95 VERNAM 6.00 6.00 PPI 96 Test Results The compounds of this invention show good antidotal activity for a variety of crops, especially soybean crops. Use of the antidote compounds did not result in a reduction of herbicidal injury to weeds. Formulations A formulation is the incorporation of a formulant in a form which is directly usable on crops and weeds. As defined herein, a "formulan > " is the material which is to be formulated. The formulant may be either an antidote compound alone or an herbicide and antidote composition. The purpose of the formulation is to apply the formula to the locus where it is desired to establish herbicidal selectivity by a convenient method. The "locus" may include soil, seeds, seedlings and vegetation. The formulations are commonly dusts, wettable powders, granules, solutions or emulsifiable concentrates. Dusts are free-flowing powder compositions containing the formulant impregnated on a particulate carrier. The particle size of the carriers is usually in the approximate range of 30 to 50 microns. Examples of suitable carriers are talc, bentonite, diatomaceous earth, and pyrophyllite. The composition generally contains up to 50% of formulant. Anti-caking and anti-static agents may also be added. Dusts may be applied by spraying from boom and hand sprayers on airplanes. Wettable powders are finely divided compositions comprising a particulate carrier impregnated with the formula and additionally containing one or more surface active agents. The surface active agent promotes rapid dispersion of the powder in an aqueous medium to form stable, sprayable suspensions. A wide variety of surface active agents can be used, for example, long chain fatty alcohols and alkali metal salts of the sulfated fatty alcohols; salts of sulfonic acid; esters of long chain fatty acids; and polyhydric alcohols, in which the alcohol groups are free, omega-substituted polyethylene glycols of relatively long chain length. A list of surface active agents suitable for use in agriculture formulations can be found in Wade Van Valkenburg, Pesticide Formulations (Marcel Dekker, Inc., N.Y., 1973) at pages 79L34. Granules comprise the formulant impregnated on a particulate inert carrier having a particle size of about 1 to 2 millimeters (mm) in diameter. The granules can be made by spraying a solution of the formulant in a volatile solvent onto the granular carrier. Examples of suitable carriers for the preparation of granules include clay, vermiculite, sawdust, and granular carbon. Emulsifiable concentrates consist of an oil solution of the formulant plus an emulsifying agent. Pricr to use the concentrate is diluted with water to form a suspended emulsion of oil droplets. The emulsifiers used are usually a mixture of anionic and nonionic surface talents. Other additives, such as suspending agents and thickeners, may be included in the emulsifiable concentrate. When the formulant is an antidote and herbicide composition, the proportion of antidote compound to herbicide compound generally ranges from approximately 0.001 to 50 parts by weight of the antidote compound per weight of the herbicide compound. Formulations generally contain several additives in addition to the formulant and carrier or agent. Among these are inert ingredients, diluent carriers, organic solvents, water, oil and water, water in oil emulsions, carriers of dusts and granules, and surface active wetting, dispersing and emulsifying agents. Fertilizers, e.g., ammoniurn nitrate, urea and superphosphate, may be included. Aids to rooting and growth, e.g., compost, manure, humus and sand, may also be included. As another alternative, the formulant can be applied to the soil in the form of a solution in a suitable solvent. Solvents fre quently used in these formulations include kerosene, fuel oil, xylene, petroleum fractions with boiling ranges above xylene and aromatic petroleum fractions rich in methylated naphthalenes. Liquid solutions, like dusts, may be applied by spraying from boom and hand sprayers on airplanes.

Claims: Claims: 1. A composition comprising: (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate compound of the formula EMI18.1 in which R1 is alkyl having 1-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; R2 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl having 1-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; and cyclohexyl; or R1 and R2 form indistinguishable parts of a single alkylene ring having 4-10 carbon atoms, inclusive; and R3 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl having 1-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; haloalkyl wherein halo is selected from the group con sisting of chlorine, bromine and iodine and alkyl has 1-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; alkenyl having 2-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; halo alkenyl wherein halo is selected from the group consisting of chlorine, bromine and iodine and alkenyl has 2-6 carbon atoms, inclusive; benzyl; and halo-substituted benzyl, wherein halo is selected from the group con sisting of chlorine, bromine and iodine; and (b) a non-phytotoxic antidotally effective amount of a compound of the formula EMI18.2 in which R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and lower alkyl having 1-4 carbon atoms, inclusive. 2. A composition as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that R is hydrogen. 3. A composition as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that R is methyl. A. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1, 2 or 3 characterised in that R1, R2 and R3 are all propyl. 5. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1, 2 or 3 characterised in that R1 and R2 are both propyl and R3 is ethyl. 6. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1, 2 or 3 characterised in that R and R2 are both butyl and R3 is ethyl. 7. A composition as claimed in any of claims 1, 2 or 3 characterised in that R is ethyl, R2 is butyl and R3 is propyl. 8. A method of establishing herbicidal selectivity comprising applying to the locus where selectivity is desired a compound of the formula EMI19.1 in which R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and lower alkyl having 1-4 carbon atoms inclusive. 9. A method as claimed in claim 8 characterised in that a compound is used wherein R is hydrogen. 10. A method as claimed in claim 8 characterised in that a compound is used wherein R is methyl. 11. A method as defined in any of claims 8, 9 or 10 characterised in that the compound is applied to a seed. 12. A seed treated with a compound as defined in claim 8, 9 or 10. 13. A method of establishing herbicidal selectivity comprising applying to the locus where selectivity is desired a composition as claimed in any of claims 1 to 7.

Inventors: GRAY, REED ALDEN
Applicants: STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1982
Main classification: A01N47
IPC codes: A01N47, A01N25