ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS

Abstract: Hot melt adhesive compositions which include a hydrogenated block copolymer such as Kraton G, about 25 to about 250 parts by weight of a hydrocarbon resin made from a petroleum or coal tar distillate, aliphatic dienes and mono and diolefins, cyclic olefins of 5 to 6 carbon atoms and hydrogenated polycyclics per 100 parts by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer, and about 25 to about 200 parts by weight of a polybutene or polyisobutylene per 100 parts of the hydrogenated block copolymer. Pressure sensitive adhesive compositions may be prepared by dissolving such mixture of ingredients in a non-reactive solvent at a concentration level of about 5 to about 25 grams 100 ml of non-reactive solvent.

Description: ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONS Background of the Invention This invention relates to hot melt adhesive com¬ positions which include a hydrogenated block copolymer suc as Kraton G, about 25 to about 250 parts by weight of a hydrocarbon resin of a petroleum or coal tar distillate, aliphatic dienes and mono and diolefins, cyclic olefins of or 6 carbon atoms and hydrogenated polycyclics per 100 par by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer, and about 2 to 200 parts by weight of a polybutene or polyisobutylene • per 100 parts of the hydrogenated block copolymer. In an¬ other aspect this invention relates to pressure sensitive adhesive compositions wherein said mixtμre of Kraton G, sa hydrocarbon resin and said polybutene or polyisobutylene i dissolved in a non-reactive solvent at a concentration lev of about 5 to about 25 grams per 100 ml. of non-reactive . solvent. | Broadly speaking, synthetic adhesives used in packaging can be classified into four categories: water based, solvent based,' reactive " and hot ~ melt adhesives. Of these four, currently the water based are used most exten¬ sively. Usually the water based adhesives are based on emulsion polymers and are applied to porous cellulosic sub strates. Energy from the outside in some fashion is appli to the system to evaporate the water in order that a stron bond may be formed. Besides this energy requirement for t formation of the bond, there is another complication with the use of water based adhesive. For a uniform coating a good uniform wetting of the substrate surface is desired, which is not easily achieved. Recently the use of hot melt adhesives has been growing very rapidly in the packaging industry. The hot melt adhesives are generally applied (as the name implies) by conventional extrusion or coating techniques in the tem perature range of 250 to 450 β F on one of the surfaces to b bonded. The other surface is brought into contact with th hot surface for a sufficient period of time for the melt t cool, so that, upon solidification, a strong and durable bond is formed. The key requirements of resins suitable for hot melt adhesive applications are that they contribute (i) go tackifying characteristics for the polymer, (ii) good phys cal properties, e.g., good tensile strength at ambient con ditions for the formulations, and (iii) reduction in the viscosity at fabrication temperatures. The key requirements for pressure sensitive adhe sives are that they should have good cohesive and tackifyi properties at ambient conditions. These adhesives should also have good flow characteristics if they are to be used in the bulk state; otherwise they should possess sufficien consistency when dissolved in suitable solvents so that th can be coated or sprayed on the surfaces to be bonded. The key requirements of resins suitable for pres sure sensitive adhesive applications are that they contri¬ bute-^i) good tackifying characteristics for- the polymer; and (ii) good physical properties, e.g., good tensile strength at ambient conditions for the formulations. Certain commercial block copolymers such as Shell's Kraton, Phillip's Solprene and DuPont's EVA copolymers attain the above objectives to a good extent. T adhesives prepared from blends incorporating these polymer have very good adhesive and strength properties at room te perature and can be processed by conventional melt coating and extrusion techniques because of their good flow char¬ acteristics. Because of this excellent combination of pro erties exhibited by ABA type when B represents a polydiene or a polyolefin block and A represents a polystyrene block the use of Kxatons at present in the industry for various pressure sensitive adhesive applications is growing. Otøpj However, the conventional block copolymers which are currently being used in adhesives technology, because o their inherent structure, have one serious drawback with re spect to their use as a satisfactory adhesive candidate. Most of the conventional Kraton polymers are block copolymers of polystyrene and a polydiene. The polydiene component in Kratons (of industrial interest) is either polybutadiene or polyisoprene. Since both polybutadiene and polyisoprene are highly unsaturated, the Kraton block copolymers comprising either one of these two polymers are highly susceptible to thermal and oxidative degradation. This imposes many constraints on the adhesive users. For example, in order to minimize the degradation, presently most often a packaging or a sealant adhesive user has to keep an inert blanket over the adhesive compound not only during formulation and processing which is usually done at somewhat elevated temperatures, but during storage as well. This becomes not only expensive, but at times cumbersome fo the packager. Another point of caution experienced with th use of Kratons in adhesives is that the long term end use properties of the final product are highly susceptible to degradation due to UV light. In order to circumvent these undesired properties of adhesives prepared using Kraton block copolymers, steps to modify the structure of these polymers have been taken. Recently ' Shell has invented and developed a new generation of Kraton block copolymers in which the mid unsaturated blocks of either polybutadiene or polyisoprene are hydro¬ genated to yield a saturated mid block. The saturated mid block is stable not only from a processing point of view, but from UV light during storage and use as well. In prac¬ tice so far it has been found that these new saturated mid block Kraton polymers are difficult to tackify. We have found that certain blends of saturated Kratons when incor¬ porated in certain proportions with selected Escorez resins together with relatively low molecular weight polybutenes OMPI such as Amoco's Indopol resins, yield systems which have very good tackifying characteristics. The aggressiveness o tack and other properties of these tertiary blends can be controlled by using carefully selected proportions of these blending ingredients and/or by incorporating certain filler and plasticizers. All of these blends are mechanically com¬ patible and have good flow properties as judged during mill ing. They can also be applied from solution if it is deeme necessary for other processing reasons. The excellent thermal stability inherent in the saturated backbone of Kraton G is a very desirable property for adhesives which will be exposed to high temperatures fo long times. Most adhesives based on ' other unsaturated elastomeric backbones can suffer degradation easily under those conditions. Summary of the Invention This invention relates to hot melt adhesive com¬ positions, which includes a hydrogenated block copolymer such as Kraton G; about 25 to about 250 parts by weight of hdyrocarbon resin of a petroleum or coal tar distillate, aliphatic dienes and mono and diolefins, cyclic olefins of or 6 carbon atoms and hydrogenated polycyclics per 100 part by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer and about 25 to about 200 parts by weight of a polybutene or polyisobuty lene per 100 parts of the hydrogenated block copolymer. Pressure adhesive compositions may be prepared which com¬ prise such mixture of ingredients dissolved in a non-reactive solvent at a concentration level of about 5 to about 25 grams per 100 ml. of non-reactive solvent. General Description The present invention relates to unique and novel hot melt adhesive compositions which comprise a blend of a hydrogenated block copolymer, a polybutene or polyisobuty¬ lene and a hydrocarbon resin, wherein to the compositions can be optionally added an oil, and/or a filler thereby modifying the rheological and physical properties of the ho melt adhesive compositions. Further, solvent based pressur sensitive adhesive compositions may be prepared by dissolv¬ ing such a mixture of ingredients in a non-reactive solvent as aforesaid. A. Hydrogenated Block Copolymers The hydrogenated block copolymers of the instant compositions are block copolymers of polystyrene and a poly diene which is typically selected from the group consisting of polybutadiene and polyisoprene, wherein the unsaturated mid block of either polybutadiene ' or polyisoprene is hydro¬ genated to yield a saturated mid block. As examples, hydro¬ genated block copolymers are manufactured by Shell Chemical Company and sold under the trade name: Kraton G. The hydrogenated block copolymers have an Mn as measured by GPC of about 25,000 to about 300,000, more preferably about 30,000 to about 200,000, and most preferably about 50,000 to about 150,000. B. Polybutene or Polyisobutylenes Any low molecular weight polybutene polymer having a molecular weight in ' the range of 500 " to 50,000 in appro¬ priate portions could be used. The polybutenes used in the present invention were polybutene, Oranite 32 and Oranite 128; also Indopol H-1900 which is quite similar to Oranite 128 and is produced by Amoco. Such polybutenes are composed predominantly of high molecular weight mono-olefins (85-98%) whose olefin structure is predominantly the trisubstituted type {R-CH=CR2) . The major component of polybutenes can be readily represented by polyisobutylene structure, and be¬ cause of this similarity of polybutenes and polyisobuty¬ lenes, various grades of polyisobutylenes manufactured by various chemical companies could be used. A blend incor¬ porating Exxon's Vistanex-LM (Blend No. 134-1 of Table 3) was prepared for illustrative purposes. The properties of this blend, as can be seen from Table 4, are very similar to those prepared by Amoco polybutenes. As well known to those who are familiar with the art, the aggressiveness of tack and properties of most of these adhesive blends can be con¬ trolled by suitable control of the amount and type of the various ingredients used and/or by addition of effective external plasticizers. The polybutene or polyisobutylene is incorporated into the hot melt adhesive composition or into the pressure sensitive adhesive composition at a concentration level of about 25 to about 200 parts by weight of the polybutene or polyisobutylene per 100 parts by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer, more preferably about 50 to about 100, and most preferably about 60 to about 90. C. Commercial Tackifier Resins To the hot melt adhesive composition or to the -pressure sensitive adhesive composition is added a commer¬ cial tackifying resin having a softening point of about 0 to about 160 β C, more preferably about 50 to about 140°C and most preferably about 70 to120 β C. A variety of commercial tackifier resins is available. Some of these resins contain and/or pinene base polyterpene resins as the main ingre- dieh€ " while others are derived ' fro the " polymerization " of petroleum or coal distillates which consist of aliphatic- dienes, mono- and di-olefins and cyclic olefins having about 5 to about 6 carbon atoms. The latter type of tackifiers has primary piperylene and/or isoprene structure. A general but excellent description of tackifying resins derived from petroleum derivatives can be found in, for example, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, Vol. 9 ^ , pages 853—860, chapter by John Findlay, published by John Wiley S Sons, NY (1968). Typical, but non-limiting, trade names of these commercial tackifiers are Wingtack of Goodyear, Escorez of Exxon, Piccolyte of Hercules and Zonrez of Arizona ' Chemicals. Recently these and various other companies have also started marketing relatively higher softening point resins and very light colored resins. These are generally modified aliphatic hydrocarbon resins and/or hydrogenated polycyclics. The physical appearance of these commercial tackifying resins varies, depending upon their softening point; they can be either viscous liquids or light-colored solids at room temperature. Most often their initial color (Gardner) is about 3.0 to about 7.0 and the density from about 0.7 to 1.0 gm/cm--" at room temperature. The acid number of these resins is usually less than 1. In general, the molecular weight of these commercial tackifying resins is not homogeneous; it spreads the number average molecular weight Mn from about 300 to about 5000 and more preferably about 500 to about 2000 and most preferably about 700 to 1600. Frequently it is desirable to enhance the clear, colorless appearance of the saturated mid block Kraton polymers by using the colorless resins, e.g., hydrogenated resins such as Escorez 5380 and Escorez 5320 of Exxon Chemical Co. U.S.A. Formulations made from these compounds and, preferably, low color polybutenes, form desirable, tacky, almost colorless and. aesthetically pleasing adhesives. These hydrocarbon tackifier resins are incor¬ porated into the hot melt adhesive composition or pressure sensitive adhesive composition at about 50 to about 150 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer, more preferably about 60 to about 125 and most preferably about 75 to about 100. D. Extended Blend Adhesive Compositions To the blend composition of the hot melt adhesive compositions or pressure sensitive adhesive compositions can be added fillers which are selected from the group consist¬ ing of talcs, ground calcium carbonate, water precipitated calcium carbonate,delaminated, calcined or hydrated clays, silicas, and carbon blacks, and mixtures thereof. These fillers are incorporated into the blend composition at about 1 to about 150 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer, more preferably at about 20 to about 150; and most preferably .at about 30 to about 100. Typically, these fillers have a particle size of about 0.03 to about 20 microns, more preferably about 0.3 to about 10, and most preferably about 0.5 to about 10. The oil ab¬ sorption as measured by grams of oil absorbed by 100 grams of filler is about 10 to about 100, more preferably about 10 to about 85 and most preferably about 10 to about 75. Typi- ι cal fillers employed in this invention are illustrated in Table I. E. Oil Extended Adhesive Compositions It is observed that the blend composition of the instant invention can also include oils to further improve low temperature properties and tack characteristics of the resulting adhesive. Levels of oil of less than about 25 parts by weight per 100 parts of the hydrogenated block copolymer can be incorporated, more preferably about 1 to about 20 parts. Oils are particularly useful when high levels of petroleum resin tackifiers are used since such materials can harden the resulting composition. Oils can -usually further soften and reduce the cost. In some cases, oils can significantly contribute to the degree of tackiness of the final product and thus are helpful in formulating various adhesive products. Typical oils that can be used may be low viscosity aromatic, naphthenic or paraffinic petroleum oils, having, less than 2 weight percent polar type compounds. Typical oils are illustrated in Table II. _ OMPI I TABLE I of oil/100 Specif Filler Code # grams of filler Gravit Calcium Carbonate Ground Atomite 15 2.71 Calcium Carbonate Purecal ϋ. 35 2.65 Precipitated Delaminated Clay Polyfil DL 30 2.61 Hydrated Clay Suprex , 2.6 Calcined Clay Icecap K 50-55 2.63 Magnesium Silicate Mistron Vapor 60-70 2.75 TABLE II 2 Viscosity % % % 3 Type Oil Oil Code # ssu Mn Polars Aromatic Saturate 4 Para inic Sunpar 115 155 400 0.3 12.7 87.0 5 Paraffinic Sunpar 180 • 750 570 0.7 17.0 82.3 6 Paraffinic Sunpar 2280 2907 720 1.5 22.0 76.5 7 Aromatic Flexon 340 120 - 1.3 70.3 28.4 H 1 O 8 Naphthenic Flexon 76.5 505 — 0.9 20.8 78.3 F. Method of Fabrication of Hot Melt Adhesive Compositions Because of the significant advances in the packag ing technology, the hot melt adhesive compositions can be used by conventional polymer fabricating techniques. After the blending is complete, the adhesive mass can either be extruded and/or calendered to a uniform thickness on top o the substrate which would be paper, cloth, aluminum foil or glass fabric. The temperature and the throughput of the extrusion are variable depending upon the viscosity of the tackifying mass and the desired coating thickness. Typi- cally the temperature of extrusions and rolls may be from about 200° to 400°F. The substrates or backings to which th pressure sensitive adhesive compositions are applied may be of various porous or nonporous types and they may be organi or inorganic in nature. Most generally, these materials ar those which are customarily employed in pressure sensitive tapes, either the cloth or paper backed types or tape back- ings made of synthetic materials, for example, polyesters such as the copolymer of ethylene glycol with terephthalic acid, vinyl such as a copolymer of vinylidene chloride and vinyl-chloride, or a copolymer " of vinylidene chloride with acrylonitrile, cellophane, cellulose acetate, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate, polypropylene, polyethylene, ethylene-propylene plastic copolymer. Sheetings and tapes of cloth or textiles of either natural or synthetic fiber origin, such as glass fiber cloth, wood and finally sheets or strips of metals such as steel, copper, aluminum, and alloys thereof can also be employed. In general, the back- ings employed are those which,heretofore have been conventionally- employed in preparing pressure sensitive labels, tapes, sheetings and the like and the selection of any particular substrate material is not a specific novel feature of the present invention . O PJL Detailed Description of the Invention The advantages of both the physical properties and adhesive characteristics of the compositions of the present invention can be more readily appreciated by reference to the following examples and tables. Unless otherwise speci- fied, all measurements are in parts per hundred by weight. Example 1 In a first series of tests, various typical binary adhesive blends of Kraton G polymer and commercial tackify- ing resins were made. The compositions of these blends are shown in Table 1 and various adhesive properties are shown in Table 2. From Table 2, it is noticed that these blends give respectable properties with respect to, for example, compatibility ' , green strength, bond strength, etc. These materials also appear to have low melt viscosities at typi- cal processing temperatures as was observed during their hot mill rolling. The ease in milling also suggests that they have good processing characteristics as well. However, as can be readily observed from the last column of Table 2, these blends are very poor in regard to their tacky nature. Blends 24-1, 24-3 and 24-5 are dry; blends 24-2, 24-4 and 24-6, wherein the loading of the resin was increased by 40% from their respective blends (1, 3 and 5) show only slight improvements. These blends do exhibit a very slight degree of tack in the melt state but nonetheless they exhibit far lower tack values at room temperatures than the values typi- cally demanded from the industrial applications viewpoint. 1 TABLE 1 2 COMPOSITION OF BINARY BLENDS OF KRATON G AND TACKIFYING RESINS 3 Blend No. 24-1 24-2 24-3 24-4 24-5 24-6 4 Kraton G 100 100 100 100 100 100 5 Escorez 1310 60 100 — — — — 6 Escorez 5380 — — 60 100 — — 7 Arkon P-85 — — — 60 100 l 8 Irganox 1 1 1 1 1 1 Example 2 Since binary blends of Kraton G polymer and tacki- fying resins failed to show any respectable degree of tacki- ness, attempts were made to make tertiary blends of Kraton G, tackifying resins and polybutenes. In Table 3 various tertiary (adhesive) blend com- positions of Kraton G system are shown. In this series of experiments, it can be seen that besides Kraton G and tacki- fying resins, as used previously in Table 1, a third co - ponent, a low molecular weight polymer, polybutene, was added. All the blends incorporating polybutene were com- patible. Blend No. 132-11, which is a binary blend of Kraton G and a polybutene (H-1900), is included here in this table for comparative purposes. This blend in its physical characteristics is more or less similar to various binary blends of Table 1. However, because of the low molecular weight nature of polybutene, the blend No. 132-11 is some- what poor in its green strength as compared to blends of Table 1 having similar compositions. Table 4 illustrates the properties of various blends of Table 3. It is clear from the last " column of Table 4 that all the blends exhibit significant improvements in their tackiness upon incorporation of polybutene. The addition of an equal amount of polybutene, such as to Escorez or Arkon resins used in formulating the adhesive blends of Table 1, improves significantly the tack of the product. This is especially true for 50-50 blends of Kraton G and resins. For example, compare Blend Nos. 24-2, 24-4, 24-6 of Table 2 with Blend Nos. 132-10, 133-2 and 133-4 of Table 4. TABLE 2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ΛDHESIVE PROPERTIES OF BINARY BLENDS OF TABLE 1 1.5 Mil Films Made From Toluene Solutions o£ Elastomer, etc. 90° Ro111ng 100° 90° Quick Glass Ball, Ro111ng Ball, Peel Quick Stick Bond 5 Blend Transition Temp, Cm Cm 180° Peel 1 day Stick 1 day Strength Mode o£ No. (Rubbery Pl ase) Initial 1 day θ 158°F Initial 6 158°F Initial 6 158°F (lbs.) Failure* Tackiness** 6 24-1 -31°C 20 25.8 1.2 0.9 0.2 0.2 1.5 A.F. Non-Tacky 7 24-2 -19°C 30 30 2.4 2.1 0.8 2.0 3.0 A.F. Very Slightly Tacky 8 24-3 -33°C 6.8 6.6 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.7 2.1 A.F. Non-Tacky 9 24-4 -25°C 13.8 12.7 2.5 2.0 1.1 1.5 4.1 A.F. Very Slightly 1 Tacky 10 24-5 -37°C 12.6 30 1.5 2.6 0.8 1.0 2.6 A.F. Non-Tacky 11 24-6 -21°C 10.2 30 0.9 1.2 0 1.0 4.7 A.F. Very Slightly Tacky 1 2 *Λ.F. - adhesive failure 13 **Subjectlve qualitative test as judged/Eelt by the technician 14 by touching the final product by his clean fingers The bond strength values reported in Tables 2 and 4 were obtained by a method similar to ASTM D-429 adhesion tests. In brief, the samples were sandwiched between mylar sheets and pressed to a thickness of about 25 mils using a hot press. Rectangular strips of 1/2 inch width and 3 inches long were cut and 90 ° peel tests were performed on an Instron at room temperature. The resin-free sections of the mylar film were clamped into air jaws to avoid any slippage during pulling. The samples were pulled at 5 inches/minute crosshead speed. The force and elongation of the samples were recorded on a strip recorder. The force necessary to separate the mylar sheets was taken as the bond strength of the blend and a measure of its cohesive strength and ad¬ hesive nature. The final plateau values are reported. The qualitative nature of the tackiness of the blends was deter¬ mined by technician's subjective "finger test" method. j TABLE 3 2 COMPOSITION OF TERTIARY BLENDS OF KRATON G, 3 TACKIFYING RESINS, AND LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYBUTENES 4 Blend Number 132-10 132-11* 133-1. 133-2 133-3 133-4 134-1 5 Kraton G 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6 Irganox 1 1 1 1 1 1 — 7 Escorez 1310 100 __-_ —._ _-_. __ __ 100 8 Escorez 5380 60 100 H 9 Arkon P-85 60 100 10 Polybutene (H-1900)** 100 100 100 100 100 100 11 Vistanex LM*** 100 12 *This binary blend is included here for comparative purposes 13 (see text for details). 14 **Polyisobutylene, a product of Amoco. 1 I TABLE 4 2 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE PROPERTIES OF BLENDS OF TABLE 3 3 Blend Bond Strength -1 Number (lbs.) Clarity* Mode of Failure*** Tackiness*** 5 132-10 2.8 ' Clear/Very Light Yellow** A.F. Tacky 6 132-11 0.5 Clear/Transparent A.F. Non-Tacky 7 133-1 2.5 Clear/Transparent A.F. Non-Tacky 8 133-2 -f' 7 Clear/Transparent A.F. Tacky 9 133-3 2.4 Clear/Transparent A.F. Very Slightly 10 Tacky 11 133-4 3.8 Clear/Transparent A.F. Tacky 12 134-1 1.7 Clear/Very Light Yellow A.F. Slightly Tacky 13 *Clarity of the film pressed in between mylar sheets, 14 **Due to the color of the resin. Kraton G is a block copolymer of the structure AB in which A is a block of styrene (total 15% by weight) whos number average molecular weight is in the range of 10,000 t 30,000. B is a block of hydrogenated polybutadiene in poly isoprene (85%) having a number average molecular weight of about 125,000. Vistanex-LM is a low molecular polyisobuty¬ lene and is an Exxon proprietary material described in de¬ tail in various U.S. patents. Amoco polybutenes are viscous, non-drying, water white, liquid butylene polymers. They are composed predominantly of high molecular weight mono-olefins (85-98%), the balance being isoparaffinic. Th major component of Amoco polybutenes can be represented by polyisobutylene structure. Arkon P-85 and Escorez resins are commercial tackifiers having a melting point in the neighbo hood of 80-90 β C. These are hydrocarbon resins de¬ rived from petroleum or coal tar distillates, aliphatic dienes and mono-olefins of 5 or•6 carbon atoms. Example 3 In this series of tests, various binary blend compositions of Kraton G and tackifying resins incorporating two types of oils: Tufflo and Shellflex, as an example were prepared. The composition of such blends and various adhe¬ sive characteristics thereof are shown in Table 5. These tests were run with mylar coated sheets having 1-2 mil films of adhesive on the plastic backing. The tests used are those published by the Pressure Sensitive Tape Council (PSTC) and widely used in the adhesive industry. They are identified in the footnotes. It is observed that with no additives, which is true for low oil loadings, the films are dry. The films prepared from these compositions exhibit poor tack as determined by polyken tester. Only composi¬ tions having high levels of oil (50 phr) exhibit somewhat improved rolling ball tack but nevertheless, these composi¬ tions exhibit poor polyken peel and quick stick adhesive characteristics. TABLE 5 COMPARISON OF OIL LEVEL ON KRATON G TACKIFICATION 1.5 Mil Film Made From Toluene Solutions of Elastomer etc. Resin Formulation Kraton G-1657 -100- 6 Resin, phr 7 Escorez 5300 60 00 80 80 75 100 125 8 Λrkon P-05 60 80 00 00 75 100 125 9 Additive 10 fufETo G056 10 10 20 50 50 50 10 10 20 50 50 50 t 11 Shellflex 371 20 20 O 12 Adhesive Properties 1 13 Rolling Ball Tack, cm( b ) 14 10 9.5 10 5 0.5 15 12.5 30+ 9.5 9.5 5 6 17 14 Polyken Tack, gm/cm 2 ( c ) (a) (a) (a) (a) 200 250 200 (a) (a) (a) (a) 275 330 43 15 90° Quick Stick, 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.3 16 lbs/ln2(e) 17 Peel, lbs/ln 2 < d > __ 0.6 0.2 1.8 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.1 2.4. 1.9 0.3 0.5 1.3 0.8 10 (a) Not measured. Dry or poor "finger tack' 19 (b) PSTC-6 20 (c) ΛSTM D-2979 21 (d) PGTC-1 22 (e) PSTC-5 E ample 4 Various adhesive blend compositions and their properties of this Example are shown in Table 6. In this case, again, the samples were prepared by adding a solution of the blend in toluene to mylar film forming a 5-10 mil film with a blade drawn across the solution, and quickly passing into an oven to evaporate the solvent, and recover¬ ing a 1-2 mil organic film with pressure sensitive adhesive properties. In these experiments, in some compositions of Table 6, an extra additive, polybutene, (Oranite 128) was added. As can clearly be seen, the addition of this ingre¬ dient inparts significant improvements in the adhesive properties of compositions of the previous Table. In par¬ ticular, it is observed that the polyken tack, is doubled from the previous compositions. The polybutene also im¬ proves the rolling ball tack. Example 5 The data of these experiments are illustrated in Tables 7 and ■&. In Table 7, direct comparisons of oil-containing adhesive blend compositions incorporating tw different grades of polybutenes are shown. As seen in previous examples, it ' is observed that " polybutene improves polyken tack, quick stick and peel strength of the adhesive compositions. Comparing the two polybutenes, it is noticed that the higher molecular weight polybutene is somewhat better in improving the tack characteristics than the low molecular weight polybutene in these formulations. In Tabl 8, comparative data of two tackifying resins differing in their softening point are shown. It is observed that the peel strength of these two types of blends is more or less equal. However, the low sortenii.g point resin sample tends to form compositions which are somewhat better in regard to their rolling ball tack. The other important point to note is that both resins respond to polybutenes better than oils (e.g., Example 3 and 4) as judged from the polyken test and quick stick measurements of these samples. TABLE 6 .EFFECT OF POLYBUTENE ADDITIVES ON KRATON G TACKIFICfiTION PSΛ formulation 4 Kraton G-1657 -100- 5 Uesln, phr 6 Kscorez 5300 60 60 100 100 100 7 Arkon P-05 60 60 100 100 100 0 Gscσrez 1310 9 Additive 10 Tufflo G056 (a) 10 50 10 50 11 Oranite 120 (b) """""• —— 50 "** *"""" 50 r 12 PSA Properties 1 13 .Tolling ualT Tack, cm 12 10 10 0.5 5.5 1. .7 12. ,5 30+ 6 13 14 Polyken Tack gms/cm 2 (o) (c) (o) 250 505 (c) (c) (c) 330 700 15 90° Quick Stick lbs/In 2 0.6 0.3 1.3 0.4 1.1 1. ,4 0. ,6 0.6 0.7 1,0 16 Peel lbs/In 2 1.0 0.5 2.3 0.5 2.6 2. .3 0. ,1 1.4 1.3 2.7 17 (a) Naphthenic Oil I 10 (b) High molecular weight polybutene 19 (c) Not measured. Dry, poor "finger tack* TABLE 7 COMPΛIUSON OF TWO 05°C SOFTENING POINT RESINS 1.5 Mil Film Made From Toluene Solutions of Elastomer etc. 4 Res i n Fo rmulat i on 5 Kraton G-1657 -100- 6 Resin phr. 7 Escorez 5300 75 75 75 100 100 100 0 Arkon P-05 75 75 75 100 100 100 t- 9 Additive t 10 Oranlϊe 32 (a) 50 50 50 50 11 Oranite 128 (b) 50 50 50 50 12 Tufflo G056 (c) 50 50 50 50 •- Adhesive Properties 14 Rolling Ball Tack, cm 6 0 5 7.5 5.5 0.5 10 15 5 10 13 6 15 Polyken Tack gm/cm 2 375 450 200 450 505 250 410 570 275 450 700 330 16 90P Quick Stick lbs/In 2 0.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 1.1 0.4 1.1 1.2 0.4 1.3 1.0 0.7 17 Peel, lbs/In 2 1.4 2.0 0.3 2.3 2.6 0.5 1.7 ■ 2.4 0.5 2.3 2.7 1.3 in (o) Low MW Polybutene 19 (b) High MW Polybutene 20 (c) Naphthenic Oil TABLE 0 COMPARISON OF 05°C AND 125°C SOFTENING POINT RESINS 1.5 Mil Films Made From Toluene Solution of Elastomer etc. 4 Resin Formation 5 Kraton G-1657 -100- 6 πesln, phr 7 Escorez 5300 (a) 75 75 75 100 100 100 8 Escorez 5320 (b) 75 75 75 100 100 100 9 Λddltlve 10 Orani e 32 (c) 50 50 50 50 11 Oranite 120 (d) 50 50 50 50 12 Tufflo G056 (e) 50 50 50 50 to 1 3 Adhesive Properties I RόTTl ng Bal l Tack , cm 6 0 5 7.5 5.5 0.5 11 23 6.0 30 30 12 15 Polyken Tack <jms/cm 2 375 450 200 450 505 250 400 600 251 500 740 345 6 90° Quick Stick lbs/In 2 0.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 1.1 0.4 0.7 1.4 0.3 1.4 1.0 0.4 7 Peel, lbs/In 2 1.4 2.1 0.3 2.3 2.6 0.5 1.9 1.3 0.4 1.4 2.2 1.3 1° (a) 05°C Softening Point Rosin (c) Low MW Polybutene (e) Naphthenic Oil 19 (b) 125°C Softening Point Resin (d) High MW Polybutene

Claims: CLAIMS 1. An adhesive composition useful as a hot melt adhesive composition which comprises: (a) a hydrogenated block copolymer of polystyren and a hydrogenated polydiene, said diene being selected fro I the group consisting of polybutadiene and polyisoprene; (b) about 25 to about 250 parts by weight of a hydrocarbon resin of a petroleum or coal tar distillate per 100 parts by weight of said hydrogenated block copolymer; j and j (c) about 25-200 parts by weight of polybutene o I polyisobutylene per 100 parts of said hydrogenated block i copolymer. 2. A composition according to claim 1 further including about 1 to about 150 parts by weight of a filler | per 100 parts by weight of said hydrogenated block copolymer, said filler being selected from the " group con¬ sisting of calcium carbonates, silicas, carbon blacks, clays and talcs and mixtures thereof and/or less than about 100 parts by weight of an oil having less than 2 weight percent polar compounds, per 100 parts by weight of said hydro¬ genated block copolymer. 3. A composition according to claim 1 or 2 ____ wherein said hydrocarbon resin is made from monomers with 5 to 6 carbon atoms consisting of aliphatic dienes, mono and ," diolefins and cyclic olefins. OMH_ 4. An adhesive composition useful as a solvent based pressure sensitive adhesive composition which com¬ prises the ingredients as set forth in claims 1 , 2 or 3 and additionally comprises a non-reactive solvent, the mixture of said hydrogenated block copolymer, said hydrocarbon resin, and said polyisobutylene or said polybutene being dissolved in a non-reactive solvent at a concentration level of about 5 to about 25 grams per 100 ml/non-reactive solvent. 5. An adhesive composition according to claim 4 further including about 1 to about 150 parts by weight of a filler per 100 parts by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer. 6. An adhesive composition according to claim 4 or 5 further including less than about 25 parts by weight 'of an oil per 100 parts by weight of the hydrogenated block copolymer.

Inventors: AGARWAL PAWAN K, HUGHES VINCENT L, LUNDBERG ROBERT D, AGARWAL, PAWAN, K., HUGHES, VINCENT, L., LUNDBERG, ROBERT, D.
Applicants: EXXON RESEARCH ENGINEERING CO, EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING COMPANY
Application year: 1982
Main classification: C08G18
IPC codes: C08L23, C08L53, C08L57, C08L101, C09J121, C09J123, C09J153, C09J157