PROTECTIVE BEAM, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Abstract: Bars, in particular such as are intended by way of safety bars for vehicles in collisions and similar situations, designed with a thin-walled, closed and trapezoidal cross-section, comprising two parallel flanges (4, 5) as well as webs (6) at an angle to the latter, whereby at least one of the flanges (4, 5) is designed with projecting corners (7) which extend along the bar and which project from the plane through the flanges (4, 5) and away from the bar at the edges of the flanges (4, 5) with preferably only the narrower flange (4) provided with projecting corners (7). The invention includes also a process for the production of safety bars whereby bar sections are roller bent in a cold state in one or serveral steps, welded together with one or several welds along its length, whereupon they are straightened in a cold state.

Description: PROTECTIVE BEAM, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME The present invention relates to a bar, in particular one intended as a safety bar in vehicles in case of collisions and similar situations. The bar is in the first place intended to be installed in doors for cars, in particular automobiles, in order to absorb forces e.g. in case of lateral collision be¬ tween cars and other vehicles. Hitherto known safety bars in car doors are of tubular design and of circular cross-section. Sincer in general it is very important to be able to keep down vehicle weights, one tends to design all load-bearing details in cars in such a way as to achieve an optimal relationship between the weight and load-bearing capacity of the component. However, if a collision with a car occurs it is not only the load-bearing capacity of - the component in its initial shape which is of interest but also its load-bearing capacity in the deformed state. The hith¬ erto known circular safety bars have been shown not to offer an optimal ratio between weight and load-bearing capacity. It has also been shown that they gradually lose their load-bearing capacity in step with the deformation of their cross-section, in as much as during this process an indentation is brought ab¬ out on the load-bearing side of the bar. With an indentation in this side the bar's capacity to absorb compressive forces in its longitudinal direction is reduced, as a result of which the bar collapses. The intention of the present invention consists in creat¬ ing a bar free from the disadvantages characterising the safety bars hitherto known. The intention has been achieved by means of a bar of thin-walled, closed and trapezoidal cross-section, comprising two parallel flanges and two webs inclined in relat¬ ion thereto. The invention is characterised in that at least one of the flanges is designed with projecting corners which ex¬ tend along the bar and project from the plane through the flange and away from the bar. It is certainly generally known how to design e.g. load- bearing roof plates of so-called trapezoidal section, where the plate ridges are trapezoidal. By comparison with bars in accordance with the invention, a bar consisting of a single ridge is, however, open along the wide one of the two parallel sides of the trapeze. If such a bar is loaded at a right angle in respect of its narrow flange lateral forces occur which form the two inclined webs of the bar. With a bar in accord¬ ance with, the present invention the lateral forces are, in the corresponding loading case, balanced thus bringing about a more advantageous weight/load ratio. The open bar is, in add¬ ition considerably less torsionally rigid than the closed bar. However, a bar of trapezoidal cross-section has the same disadvantages as e.g. a bar of circular cross-section, since it buckles on the side on which it is loaded. The load-bearing cap- acity of the trapezoidal bar is greatest on the side with the narrow flange, but this capacity almost ceases if the narrow flange is buckled inward- and is accordingly no longer capable of absorbing co pressive stresses. A safety bar in e.g. a car is highly likely to buckle in case of a collision, as a result of which its load-bearing capacity largely ceases. With the pres¬ ent invention, however, at least the narrow fiange is therefore designed with projecting corners which extend along the bar and project from the plane through the flange and away from the bar. Owing to these projecting corners the bar is protected against buckling, e.g. in case of a violent collision, in as much as the corners absorb most of the energy which would have buckled the flange of a bar without projecting corners. Thus the corners act as a deformation zone protecting the flanges of the bar in the same way as e.g. the front of the car constitutes a deformation zone protecting its passenger compartment. Another advantage of providing the narrow flange with projecting corners consists in that it is possible to ensure thereby that the same amount of material is available on either side of the neutral line of the bar cross-section, which is parallel to the flanges. A disadvant- age of the projecting corners consists in the fact that the bar OM webs are loaded with eccentric forces. This produces a bending moment v/hich initiates bending outward as well as buckling of * the webs. This disadvantage can, however, be mostly eliminated by not making the webs entirely flat but bending them slightly 5 inward towards the centre of the bar. With very thin sheet this local buckling due to the concentrated load can also be counteracted with the aid of a longitudinal step-like web fold provided at the centre of the webs. This step changes the shape . of the bucklingwaves thus causing the critical buckling-load to 10 increase. The strength of bars in accordance with the invention is increased by a production process consisting in that the profile of the bar is produced by so-called roller bending and subsequent straightening, thus bringing about cold working and stretching 15 at each corner of the profile. By roller forming the profile in one piece and welding it together while at the same time locat¬ ing the seam preferrably at the centre of the narrow and as a rule pressure absorbing flange, tensile stresses are, after straightening, brought about in a narrow flange which, with com- 20 pressive loading, increase its strength. The invention is described below with reference to a spec- iment embodiment relating to a safety bar for car doors and in accordance with the attached figures. However, the invention is not limited to safety bars for cars but extends also to bars 25 which may be subject to corresponding violent stress sequences, e.g. protective barriers along roads and in particular bridges. Figure 1 shows a car door as seen from inside with a safety bar clamped within it. r Figure 2 shows a cross-section of the safety bar in accord- 30 ance with fig. 1. Figures 3 - 6 show alternative cross-sections of safety bars. A safety bar, 1, consisting of thin steel sheet" is, accord¬ ing to figure 1, horizontally arranged within a car door, 2, with a narrow flange directed towards the outside of the door and flang 35 ed at the other end in a mounting, 3, at the front or rear edge of the door, respectively. The intention of bar, 1, is to protect the passengers in the car against the door, 2, being pressed inwards if a collision occurs with the outside of the door, 2. The bar, 1, prevents on the one hand the door, 2, from being de- formed in such a way that parts thereof penetrate into the com¬ partment of the car, and on the other hand prevent the door, 2, from detaching itself, in the course of the deformation, from the surrounding frame and being pressed entirely into the com¬ partment. The-cross-section of the safety bar, fig. 2, compris- es a narrow flange, 4, intended to absorb compressive stresses when loaded from the outside of the door, 2, a wide flange, 5ι parallel to the narrow flange, •+, and symmetrical in relation to the narrow flange, , a line of symmetry constituting " a per¬ pendicular in respect of the plane through the narrow flange, -, as v/ell as two bar webs, 6, which link the two flanges, ■ + and 5- The narrow flange, , is designed with projecting corners, 7 t which extend along the bar 1, and which project from the plane through the narrow, flange, -V, and away from the bar, 1. The bar profile is brought about by roller forming of a sheet strip, whereby the edges of the strip meet at the centre of the narrow flange, •+, where the edges are joined by means of a weld, 8. As a result of the welding process the bar, 1, tends to bend so that the narrow flange, ■ +, develops a concave shape in the longi¬ tudinal direction of the bar, and it is for this reason that the bar, 1, is straightened after welding. The webs, 6, are so arrang¬ ed as to form -an angle of 1 - 30 , preferably 1 - 10 , in re¬ spect of the perpendicular to the plane through the flanges, k- and 5- The webs, 6, may be flat between the corners but can also be made slightly concare. In case of a lateral collision, the forces impinge, as stated above, predominantly upon the foremost projecting parts, 11, of the corners, 7- As stated above, the forced lines, 12, will in this case extend between the foremost projecting parts, 11, of the projecting corner, 7, and the corner between the web, 6, and the wide flange, 5, of the safety bar, 1, on the same side as the safety bar, 1. This brings about a bending OM moment acting upon the web, 6, which tends to bend the latter outward. The tendency for this bending of the web, 6, can be reduced by making the web, 6, from start slightly concave in the direction towards the centre of the safety bar, 1, so th a t as possible as large a part of the web, 6, /is located within the force lines, 12, described above. The thickness of the sheet constit¬ uting the bar amounts to 0.5 - ^-0 mm. With sheet thicknesses close to the lower limit it is advisable to provide a step, 13i in the central region of the webs, so as to stabilise them ag* ainst buckling, fig. 6. All bending radii at the corner sect¬ ions are minimal bearing in mind the bendability of the mater¬ ial, i.e. about 2.0 mm. The height of the corner sections, 7, is so dimensioned as to bring about a requisite deformation zone with a view to protecting the flat part of the flange, h, which is subject to the compressive stress. The bending radii at the top of the corner, 7, are about half the width of the corner, 7. In an alternative embodiment of the safety bar, fig. 3, the cross-sectional profile has been brought about by roller form¬ ing two bar halves, which constitute each others mirror image and are joined by a weld, 8, in the narrov; flange, as well as a weld, 9 ι i the wide flange, 5- With an alternative embodiment of a safety bar in accordance with fig. - the cross-sectional profile has been brought about by roller forming of a sheet strip, whereby the edges of the strip have been joined by means of a lockseam, 10, at the line of symmetry and within the wide flange, 5, which is always exposed to tensile stresses when the narrow seam, , is subject to pressure. Alternatively also the wide flange, 5 ι can be provided with corners, 7, fig. 5 , by way of protection in case of pressure load if any acting upon this flange, e.g. where bars constitute prot¬ ective barriers along motor roads etc.. Exa ple So as to be able to determine the energy absorption capac¬ ity of the invention on a laboratory scale and by comparison with a conventional bar, a safety rail, 1, in accordance with the in- vention was produced from 1.60 mm steel sheet with a breaking 2 point of 1000 N/mm , the dimensions being as follows: Length of wide flange, 5 53 mm Perpendicular distance between the flanges, 5, ^ 28 mm Angle between the webs, 6, and the wide flange, 5 32 mm The webs, 6, were in this example flat between the corners 7«_- The weight amounted to 1.8 kg/m. By way of comparison with the safety bar, 1, in accordance with the invention use was made of a currently conventional safety bar for a modern car, consisting of a circular tube with an outer diameter of 31 ran- and a material thickness of 2.6 mm. The tube had been made of a relatively costly grade of steel with a breaking point of 1300 N/mm . Also this tube weighed 1.8 kg/m. When subject to identical testing it was found that the safety bar, 1, and the tube possessed the same energy absorb¬ ing capacity in spite of the fact that the tube had been produced of a far costlier grade with a breaking point 30/-- higher. A safety bar in accordance with the invention is, in addition, cheaper to form than a tube.

Claims: PATENT CLAIMS 1. A bar in particular one intended as a safety bar (l) for vehicles in collisions and similar situations, formed with a thin-walled closed and trapezoidal cross-section, comprising two parallel flanges ( , 5) and two webs (6) at an angle to the latter c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that at least one of the flanges (4, 5) is designed with projecting corners (7) which extend along the bar and which project outward from the plane through the flanges (4, 5) and away from the bar at the edges of the flanges ( , 5). 2. A safety bar (l) in accordance with Claim 1 c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that only the narrower flange ( • +) is provided with projecting corners (7). 3- A safety bar (l) in accordance with Claim 1 or 2 c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that the webs (6) are slightly bent in the direction towards the ' entre of the safety bar (1). . A safety bar (1) in accordance with Claim 1 or 2 c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that the webs (6) are provided wit stiffening steps (13). 5. A safety bar in accordance with Claims 1 - c h a r a c t e r i s e d in that the bar section is produced in one or several pieces and provided with at least one weld (8) arranged at the centre of the narrow flange (.-'+). 6. A process for the production of safety bars in accord¬ ance with Claims 1 - 5 c h a r a c t e -r i s e d in that the bar section is roller bent in a cold state in one or several stages, welded together with one or several welds along its length and then straightened in a cold state.

Inventors: INGVARSSON LARS, INGVARSSON, LARS
Applicants: DOBEL AB
Application year: 1982
Main classification: B21D5
IPC codes: B21D47, B60J5