NON-PUFFING PETROLEUM COKE

Abstract: Very fine particle size chromic oxide is dispersed in a high sulfur petroleum coker feedstock before or during delayed coking to produce a needle coke with low CTE and negligible puffing on heating to the temperature of graphitization.

Description: Description NON-PUFFING PETROLEUM COKE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION: Electrode grade graphite is manufactured from a commercial grade of coke having an acicular, anisotropic microstructure called needle coke, see U.S. 2,775,549 to Shea, Dec. 25, 1956, Cl. 201-42, made by delayed coking of certain petroleum residues under specific conditions of heat and pressure- To produce graphite from such coke, it is necessary to heat it to a temper- ature in the range of 2000-3000 C, which has the dual function of supplying energy for the conversion of the carbon in the coke to the graphitic crystalline form and of volatilizing impurities. When carbon bodies made from such cokes are heated at temperatures in the vicinity of 1000-2000 C, various sulfur-containing co - pounds decompose, attended by a rapid and irreversible expansion of the carbon body. This phenomenon is termed "puffing". During the production of graphite articles, particularly high, performance graphite electrodes, puffing is extremely undesirable as it may destroy the structural integrity of the piece and render it marginal or useless for its intended purpose. Puffing of a carbon article made from high sulfur cokes generally starts at about 1500 C,.and may result in a volumetric expansion of as much as 25%. It is not simply an elastic expansion but should be characterized as an inelastic, irrevers- ible expansion. The generally accepted explanation of the puffing phenomenon is that in acicular needle cokes with, a relatiyely large amount of sulfur, sulfur atoms are bonded to carbon atoms by coyalent bonds, either in carbon ring structures or linking rings. - These 5 bonds are less stable at high temperatures than the carbon-to- carbon bonds. On heating, the carbon-sulfur bonds rupture, the sulfur is freed, then reacts, with hydrogen to form hydrogen sulfide. The simultaneous rupture of these honda and eyolution of hydrogen sulfide and other sulfur containing materials causes 10 the physical expansion called puffing. Puffing has been avoided in the past by using coke made from petroleum residues low in sulfur content. This approach is of only limited utility at present since the principal petroleum crudes currently in use have high sulfur contents, and the cokes 15 made from their residues such as decant oil from catalytic cracking or thermal tar, will normally exhibit an undesirable degree of puffing Another approach to elimination or alleviation of the uffing problem in manufacture of graphite articles has been by the use of additives. These additives have usually been added during the 20 mixing stage when various sizes and grades of coke particles are mixed, before being wetted with pitch binder, formed into the desired shape, baked at an intermediate temperature and graphitized at high temperatures. Additives have included primarily metal salts and oxides, as disclosed in British 733,073, Greenhalgh, July 6, 25 1955, Cl. 90 b; French 1,491,497, Gillot et al. , Aug. 11, 1967, Cl. C Ql b; French 2,035,273, Continental Oil, Pec. 18, 1970, Cl. C 10 b 57; U.S. 3,642,962, Wξillouch, Feb. 15, 1972, Cl. 2Q1-17; U.S. 3,563,705, Grinds.ti_.ff et al., Feb. 16, 19.71, C. C 01 b 31/04, Cl. 423-375; U.S. 3,842,165, Grindstaff et al. Oct. 15, 1974, Cl. 30 C 01 b 31/04, Cl. 264-29.1; and U.S. 3,338,993, Juel et al. Aug. 29, 1967, Cl. 106-56. The patents above disclose the use of iron, sodium, chromium, nickel, cobalt, boron, aluminum, titanium, calcium, zirconium, manganese, magnesium, barium and strontium compounds as puffing 35 inhibitors. Some compounds of this group are in general usage and of these a choice is naturally made based upon the effec- tiveness as a puffing inhibitor and upon other properties, of the graphite article such as electrical resistivity, " tensile strength, modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity, coefficient of thermal expansion, and cost.. Of the above, French 1,491,497 discloses the use of chromium oxide at 0.2-5% in a mixture with ' coke and a binder- as a catalyst, enabling, graphitization to occur at temperatures in the. range of 1200°-2000°C. French 2,035,273 discloses a low sulfur coke produced by the addition of 0.3-5% of sodium carbonate to the coking stream mix¬ ture and subsequent hydrogenation of the coke at high temperature. British 733,073 discloses the use of oxides of chromium, iron, copper, or nickel incorporated in the grinding stage of coke, mixed with pitch, shaped, baked at 1200 C, and graphitized at 2500°-2800°C. U.S. 3,563,705 discloses the use of mixtures of iron or calcium compounds with small amounts of titanium or zirconium compounds as puffing inhibitors incorporated into the coke-binder mixture. U.S. 3,338,993 discloses the use of calcium, magnesium, strontium, and barium fluorides as puffing inhibitors with raw or calcined coke and binder, mixed, shaped, baked and graphitized. U.S. 3,642,962 discloses the use of 1-3% calcium cyanamid or calcium carbide as desulfurizing agents and puffing inhibitors, mixed with raw coke prior to calcining. At present, the most common methods of the above are those using iron oxides mixed dry in the. coke-pitch binder blend as puffing inhibitors. These are effective puffing inhibitors but must be used with caution, as their use tends to increase the coefficient of thermal expansion or CTE, of the finished product, to an undesirable level. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE)., which is conventionally expressed in in./in./ C or cm./cm./ C, is also of -Vital importance in the production of graphite for certain applications. Electrodes for electric furnace melting of steel must have a low CTE to ayoid exces- sive differential expansion at operating temperatures and the resultant spalling, which in turn causes excessive consumption of the electrode in operation. Other applications requiring dimensional stability at high temperatures are well-known although of somewhat less economic importance. In general, the addition of any foreign material to a graphit- izing carbonaceous mix will have, in addition to its desired effect, such as puffing inhibition, the effect of increasing the CTE of the graphite body. A needle coke is distinguished by its physical structure when microscopically examined, showing long needle-like acicular particles. Such cokes, to be suitable for manufacture of graphite electrodes to be used in ultra-high powered electric steel fur¬ naces, should have a graphite CTE characteristic of less than 5 x 10 / C measured over the range of 0 -50 C. Needle cokes for lower powered electric steel furnaces may have a graphite CTE characteristic of as much as 7 x 10 / C over the 0 -50 C range. The cokes or blends of cokes must be thoroughly mixed with the puffing inhibitor to avoid the difficulties present in making uni¬ form homogeneous blends and to thoroughly coat the particles, which are often as much as 7mm. in diameter. Both of these difficul- ties can lead to non-uniform dispersion of the inhibitor and to puffing, even though there is sufficient inhibitor present in the total mix to prevent puffing. This non-uniformity is particularly troublesome when operating under the newer type of of graphitization processes, which, raise the temperature of the carbon bodies (i.e. electrodes) at a much higher rate than the older processes. The combination of high sulfur with. high, rate of tempera¬ ture rise exacerbates the problem and requires undesirably slow heat¬ ing rates to overcome puffing. It should be emphasized that overcoming the puffing problem becomes increasingly more di ficult in the larger graphite electrode sizes (.above 20 in. ( . (.51 cm.)), diam) because in such, sizes, larger particles of coke are used. Since the puffing inhibitor only coats the surface of the particles, the coke surface area to in¬ hibitor weight ratio decreases, for a given weight addition ratio, giving a higher concentration of inhibitor on the coke particle surfaces for the larger particle blends. Thus a large amount of the inhibitor is at relatively greater distance from the centers of the coke.particles in the larger coke particle mixes as opposed to the smaller particle mixes, used in smaller electrodes. Migration of the inhibitor into the centers of the large particles becomes progressively more difficult and less effective as the coke particles increase in size. The puffing problem is further increased with the rate of graphitization of the carbon bodies. Optimum distribution of the inhibitor throughout the structure of the carbon body to be graphitized is essential as the degree of puffing for any coke particle blend is highly rate sensitive, being directly related to the rate of temperature increase during the graphitization cycle. Thus, the figures in certain of the examples given will show a much higher dynamic puffing at a 14 C/min. temperature rise than for a 5 C/min. rise. The amount of puffing for any given coke-inhibitor blend could be expressed as a proportionality in the general form: DP = K(S,P,ΔT) where S = sulfur content of coke P * = mean particle size ΔT = rate of temperature where DP = dynamic puffing increase 1 • ** = amount of inhibitor K * = proportionality factor Thus it may be seen that increases in sulfur content,- par-- tide size, and temperature rise will increase puffing, while an increase in the inhibitor leyel will decrease puffing. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION: A petroleum coker feedstock which would normally produce a puffing coke due to its high sulfur content is rendered non- puffing by the addition of an effectiye amount of a chromium com¬ pound, preferably chromic oxide, to the feedstock * as a fine particle size powder. The chromic oxide may be pre-dispersed in a high concentra¬ tion in a small quantity of the feedstock (fresh feed or coker fur- nace feed) or compatible material miscible with the feedstock or dispersed in the total coker stream and added either batchwise to a batch type coker, continuously to the main stream in a delayed coker, or near the top or side of a delayed coker, as in the case of anti- foam additives, while the coke stream is admitted into the coker at or near the bottom of the unit. The use of a fine, particle size chromic oxide of 100% less than 5 micron and 70% less than 2 micron diameter, predispersed in a por¬ tion of the feedstock, insures that the final product will be a homo¬ geneous coke with chromic oxide uniformly distributed throughout. A current of inert gas or steam bubbled slowly through the hydrocarbons in a batch type coker during the run aids in keeping the chromic oxide in suspension without significantly increasing the CTE of the finished product. For a description of delayed coking, see R. J. Diwoky, Continuous Coking of Residuum by the Delayed Coking Process, Refiner and Natural Gasoline Manufacturer, Vol. 17, No. 11, Nov. 1938. The Cr 0 dispersion may be injected through the anti-foam injector ports or a special fitting. Many chromium compounds may be used, and the present dis¬ closure is not meant to limit the scope of the inyention. Cr 0 , for example is the final product of calcination of numerous chromium compounds, e.g., hydrated Cr .III) oxide, Cr (III) nitrate, [Cr(NH ) ] (NO ) , and other complex compounds and salts such as 3 6 3 3 (NH ) Cr 0_. Cr O, is manufactured commercially by ignition of compounds such as metal chromates and bichromates with reducing agents and may be produced in situ by reduction with the coke. The reactive species may be elemental chromium, produced by reduction of the Cr_ -. by the coke during the graphitization process, or by dissociation occurring at or below its melting point (.2275°C) , similarly to the production of ferrochromium alloys by reduction of chromite ore with coke in a submerged arc furnace. The mode of operation of Cr_0 in inhibiting puffing has the most likely hypothesis of the reaction with a sulfur compound to form Cr S in a scavenging reaction, the sulfide later decom¬ posing at a higher temperature in a slower reaction. In general the use of any of the additives listed above, when added to a coke particle-pitch binder mix, will lower the extent of puffing, but at the same time significantly increase the CTE, of the graphite bodies made from such, cokes. We have found 5 that the use of chromium oxide dispersed in the coker feedstock — when coking in a delayed coker gives an unexpected adyantage in that it controls puffing of the. coke while increasing the CTE only to a smaller degree C r in some instances not at all) . , when compared to the CTE of a graphite body in which the puffing has 10 been eliminated by adding the same additive to the electrode mix by the conventional dry-mix practice. CTE of the graphitized coke was determined by preparing small 5/8" x 5" (1.6 x 12.7 cm.) electrodes by the procedure disclosed in U.S. patent 2,775,549, (except for calcination of the coke to 1250 C) , 15 and measuring their elongation over the temperature range of 0 to 50°C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT In figure 1 a decant oil, the fractionater tower bottoms from a catalytically cracked gas oil fraction, also termed slurry oil, 20 or other equivalent hydrocarbon residue, is conveyed from the fractionater 33 through line 10 and meter 14 to diversion valye 17, where a portion of the feedstock is diverted through valve 13, and meter 15 to disperser 18. Simultaneously a portion of chromic oxide 12 is weighed in scale 16 and conveyed to disperser 25 18 where it is dispersed in the feedstock to a specific concen¬ tration by weight. Alternately a compatible liquid and additives from supply 19 are metered through valye.11 to valye 13 and meter 15 to disperser 18. The chromic oxide is dispersed and discharged through, line 22 and ' meter 23 to yalye 34 ' , line 36 and 30 injection ports 38 and 38A or alternately to mixer 24 where it is mixed with the main portion of the. feedstock coming through, line 20 and meter 25, to the exact proportion desired. The chromic oxide concentrate mixed with the feedstock is then conventionally delay coked. The overheads are taken off ' through 35 line 32 and sent to the fractionator 33. Bϋ'-' f / v In the above flowsheet, 18 is the disperser which jnay be any of several types of equipment well known in the art, preferably a high shear or colloid mill. Alternately, a sand or ball mill could be used. In practice, a dispersion of approximately 3-5Q% by wt. of chromic oxide in the feedstock is used as a concentrate. The chromic oxide dispersion and feedstock are metered in the correct proportion to give a concentration of approximately 0.05- 0.5 wt. % Cr 0 in the feedstock * . At the operating temperatures the viscosity of the feedstock is extremely low and some means is necessary to minimize set¬ tling and a concentration of the chromic- oxide in the lower portion of the coker during batchwise coker operation. We have found that by the introduction of a small flow of inert gas bubbled up from the bottom of the coker drum, the chromic oxide is maintained in a uniform suspension without significantly raising the CTE of the finished product or lowering the acicular crystal content of the coke. It is preferable to add the Cr 0, at or near the top of _. 3 a commercial delayed coker while admitting preheated coker feed through or near the bottom of the coker. The following are examples of specific methods of practicing the invention: c EXAMPLE 1 * The micronized puffing inhibitor, chromic oxide, was mixed with samples of a fresh, feed decant oil coker feedstock., at 0.1 wt. % leyel in a high, speed blender for about 5 minutes. The mixtures were coked under identical conditions, in 4 liter resin flasks. In an insulated glass resin flask, an inert gas ' at the rate of 0.16 SCFH/kg (.4.5 l./hr./kg.) was bubbled up from the bottom of the coking pot to keep the Cr 0 uniformly dispers d in feedstock. The following time-temperature cycle was used: Temperature Elapsed ' Time Rate*AC ' / x Room to 350 C 3 hours 11Q .350-450°C 4.5-5 hours 2Q- - 450°C 16 hours — 450-530°C 4.0-4.5 hours 2Q 530°C 1 hour 530°C-RT Cool-down, power off Dynamic puffing (DPI of the cokes was then determined by the method " below and compared with, uninhibited samples, and with samples inhibited in the normal manner with dry-mixed iron oxide. The coke samples had 50% < 200 mesh ( . 78 mesh/cm.1 particles and 100% < 65 mesh (26 mesh/cm.) particles. DP was measured by taking representative samples by the method of ASTM D346-35, crushing, mixing 100 g coke and 25 g pitch, * . and molding plugs at 12,500 psi (879 kg./cm. ) . . The plugs were measured by micrometer and placed in a dilatometer. The temperature was raised to 1200 C over a period of 50+10 min. The test was run at a temperature increase of 5 or 12-16 C/min. over the 1200 -2900 C range, with measurements taken every five minutes. The reported DP (dynamic puffing) is the maximum percentage of elongation ( (oorr sshhrriinnkkaaggee)),, mmeeaassuured. All of the DP's below were at 14 C/min. rise except as noted Coke Properties Inhibitor Added to Coke Yld. Ash. S CTE .x lo " /°C** DP, % Δ Feedstock 9- % % pph Fe-,0 3 * pph Fe n O_* _p 0 h 0 23.3 0.01 1.17 3.0 6.8 — 0 23.3 0.01 1.17 3.8 1.7 0.1% Cr 0 22.6 0.46 1.07 3.8 -1.5 * (Iron oxide dry-mixed into the coke). **(Coefficient of Thermal Expansion over the range* of 0°-50°C.X 10~ 7 /°C, 5/8" x 5" ((1.6 X 12.7 cm.U sample, 10 min. time) *** (Dynamic Puffing over the range , of 1200°-2900°C) It is clear that micronized. chromic oxide was found to be highly effective. The addition of micronized chromic oxide to the feedstock inhibited puffing of the resulting coke- While exhibit¬ ing lower DP, the resulting- coke had a CTE tQ.5% a.sh which is essentially chromic oxide) , equal to that of the ' coke inhibited with an equal amount of iron oxide in a dry blend. EXAMPLE 2 Identical to Example 1 except that Q.05 wt. % micronized chromic oxide was added to the feedstock prior to coking with the results shown below: Coke Properties Inhibitor Added to Coke Yld. Ash S CTE x ιo- 7 /°c DP, % Δ L Feedstock % g. pph pph Fe„0_,* Fβ 2°3* • .0 h 0 • 0 23.3 0.01 1.17 3.0 3.6 6.8 1.7 0.05% Cr 0. 3 21.8 0.25 1.17 3.0 1.5 --- *dry blend The above data. indicate that the addition of micronized chromic oxide to the coker feedstock resulted in a coke (.0.25% ash) with a lower CTE and a lower puffing than that of the coke conventionally inhibited with corresponding amounts of iron oxide, respectively. EXAMPLE 3 .Micronized chromic oxide (Q.1 wt. %) was added to another sample of furnace feed decant oil coker eedstocks The mixture was coked in the sam manner described in Example 1: Coke Properties Inhibitor Added to Coke Yld. As S CTE x 10 /°C DP, % Δ L Feedstock ' % ' % - pp Fe.O.,* - • pph Fe„0_* _____ _____ ' Q 1 0 26.4 -. -.0.01 .0.97 3.3 3.5 +2-3 -1.8 0.1% Cr„0_ 25.6 Q.35 • 0.98 2.6 -1.3 *dry blend The above data showed that micronized chromic oxide (Q-l wt. %) added to the feedstock inhibited puffing of the resulting coke without adversely affecting the CTE of the coke. In fact, the CTE of the resulting coke (0.35% ash) was less than that of the coke with no inhibitor or conventionally inhibited with 1 pph iron oxide. ' EXAMPLE 4 Micronized chromic oxide ( . 0.075 wt. %) was dispersed in a sample of slurry oil coker feedstock. The mixture was then coked using the procedure of Example 1. The properties of the coke were determined for comparison with that of the control coke from this oil with and without the addition of micronized chromic oxide. Coke Properties ' Inhibitor Added to Coke Yld. Ash S CTE DP, %. Δ L Feeds!zock % % % ιo ~7 /°c pph Cr 2°3* 0 1 0 16.3 Q.06 ι. ?a 2.5 8.5 o.o 75% 16.7 0.51 1.36. 2.2 0.7 *Dry blend It is seen from the above comparison that micronized chromic oxide added to the feedstock resulted in a coke (Q.51% ash), with a substantial reduction in puffing without adversely affecting the CTE of the coke. In fact, the CTE of the coke made in the presence of chromic oxide was slightly lower than that from the original untreated feedstock. EXAMPLE 5 Micronized chromic oxide was added conventionally by dry mix¬ ing to a coke sample made from the decant oil of Example 1, to determine its relative effectiveness in a dry blend ys. * addition to the coker feedstock, to an equal Cr_0 concentration on the coke basis with respect to puffing inhibition. Results were as follows: Coke Properties ' Inhibitor . DP, Δ L Added to CTE 2*-C£ 2 °3 Feedstock Ash % S% ιo- 7 /°c 0 h* 0.1% Cr 2 0 3 0.46 1.07 3.8 -1.5 *dry blend The above data clearly indicate that micronized chromic oxide is more effective in the coker feedstock ..than when used, conventionally as a puffing inhibitor. Examples 1-5 above were made in 4 liter resin flasks and were agitated by nitrogen bubbling for one minute when the te per- ature reached 420 C. No settling of chromic oxide was observed. EXAMPLE 6 Large, batch cokings were made on samples of a different fresh feed batch of decant oil feedstock from the same supplier as in No. 1, with results as follows: %Cr 0- Coke Properties added to Coke CTE. t. Feedstock. Yield 10~ 7 / C D?,% Δ L Run No's 2, 3, 7 il composite 991 (450. kg.)_ 0 21.2% 3.2 7.8 Run No's 4, 5, 6, 8 composite 1303 (591 kg.). Q.ll 22.2 ' 4.3 0.7 Run No's 10, 11, 12 composite 1Q28 (466 kg.) . 0.15 21.2 5.1 0.1 All of the. above, except #5 were bubbled with. N_. through the 400°- 440. C temperature range at the rate of ' 2 C-F.M- ' ' (.5.7.1. min. X . The composite samples were calcined at about 1300- C for 30 min. with calcined coke yields of about 75%. The properties of the calcined cokes were as follows: Inhibitor Density ■ Ash. CTE . Sample No. % g/c . c % 10 "7 /°C DP , % Δ L 1894-20A 0 2.10 . 0.24- 3.9. 1.1 1894-2 . 0B. 0.11 . 2.14 0.81 4.6 ■ 0.3 1894-20C 0.15 - 2.12 l. " 23 4.3 0.1 The values for the. raw and calcined cokes were in good agreement, except fo " the uninhibited calcined sample, which had a lower than expected dynamic puffing, which ordinarily is similar to the puffing shown by the raw coke exam. . EXAMPLE 7 ■ In a test to determine the appropriate amount of Cr O . to be added to the feedstock and the amount of agitation, an automatic coker was charged with 1Q kg of another lot of -the previously mentioned decant oil from Example 6 and varying amounts of Cr 0 were added to the feedstock. The batches were agitated by bubbling with 2 C-F.H. ( . 57 l./hr.) through the temperature interval from 390 -440 C, which at the temperature rise of 5 /C/hr, took 10 hrs. Results are tabulated below: Coke Properties %Cr_0 added Coke Ash D:istribi tion CTE DP Run No. to feedstock. Yield Top Mid Bpt. ιo- 7 /°c % Δ L 1897-21 Q 31.1%. 0.Q3% 0.01% 0.Q2%. • T a -O.l 14.9 1897-22 0.1 31.8 .0.34 0.28 0.33 2.8 4.4 1897-35 0.2 28.Q 0.67 0.66 0.84 4-4 -^-0.5 1897-20 0.4 31.6 1.19 1.26 1.28 4.1 --0.1 Low CTE values * characterize graphite bodies made from high sulfur needle cokes because such, bodies puff considerably ( . see 1897-21) at temperatures between 1200 o -2900°C due to the high sulfur content. The cokes above showed no puffing when 0.2% Cr 0 was added to the f edstock while maintaining a CTE within the level of a high quality coke. EXAMPLE 8 The same feedstock, in Example 7 was processed in a 4 1. resin 5 flask with 0.5 C.F.H. (14 l./hr.l bubbled through, the system during the temperature interval of 400 -450 C while the temperature was raised at a rate of 20- /hr, for a period of 2.5 hrs. Results of these tests are shown.below: Cr O Add. Coke ' Ash Ash CTE DP 10 Run No. to feedstock Yjeld Top Bot. 10 /°C % Δ L 1959-7/10 0.15% 26.1% 0.56% 0.58% 3.1 0.3 1959-3/5 0.2 24.5 0.82 0.89 3.8 -?-0.7 It is evident here also that a high quality coke with low CTE and puffing has been made. 15 EXAMPLE 9 In this test, coke samples produced in Examples 7 and 8 ' above were mixed in a standard commercial mix of coke with parti¬ cles up to 3 mesh (1.2/cm.) . with coal tar pitch binder, forming pieces by molding, baked to 720 C, then graphitized at two different upheat 20 rates of 5 and 14 C/min. , with results showing dynamic puffing over the range of 1200-2900 C as follows: Cr 0 Added %Cr 0 in coke DP, • % Δ L DP, % Δ L Coke to Feedstock (Composite) 5 C C/min. 14 ( C/min. 1897-21 Q 0 9.4 21.0 25 1897-22 0.1 0.34 4.5 7-0. 1859-7/10 0.15 Q.67 Q.8 1.6 1897-20 0.4 1.25. Q.l 0.4 The improvement due to Cr„0 in elimination of puffing at the higher upheat rate of 14 C/min. is particularly evident in 30 the above data and in the attainment of protection against puffing at a low inhibitor level. EXAMPLE 1Q Blends of smaller. article sized (up to 6.mesh. C(2.4 nesh/cm.) ) ) cokes made in two different cokers from the same feedstock, as in Example 7, mixed with coal tar pitch binder and .molded as in Example 9, were tested at the two upheat rates, with, the following results: %Cr 2 0 3 Added to Coke % Ash CTE DP, % Δ L DP % Δ. L Run No. Feedstock % Yield in Coke 1Q /°C 5°C/min. 14°C/min. 1897-35 0.2 28 0.73 4.4 0.6 0.8 (Automatic Coker). 1959-3/5 0.2 24.5 0.92 3.8 0.2 0.5 (Resin Flask) (The higher ash content of the sample prepared in the resin flask is probably due to a slight ' pickup of silica from the flask.) The favorable results obtained at the high upheat rates are notable. EXAMPLE 11 Chromite ore ground to -325 mesh (.125 mesh/cm. ). was dispersed in the same decant oil coker feedstock and the mixture was coked, in the same fashion as in Example 1_ above. The ore had the following analysis: Cr O - 36% Al 2°3 ~ 30% Fe 2 0 3 - 14% inert - 20% Particle size. - 325 -.mesh (.125 mesh/cm.)_ The results were as follows: % Ore Added CTE DP, % / x L to Feedstock lQ- 7 /°C 0 2.9 8.3 0.1 3.8 1.3 0.2 3.2 0.5 0.3 5.7 <-2.3 The. data shows that chrαmite ore as the source of chromium is effective as a puffing inhibitor. EXAMPLE 12 In this ruπ,_ two feedstocks with very high, sulfur leyels were treated with Cr o and coked by th standard method in Example 1, and compared with, untreated control samples- Results were: Coke Properties % Cr 2 0 3 Added to CTE Feedstock Feedstock Ash % S % ιo- 7 /°c DP, % _ L Clarified Oil Q 0.10 2.30 3.0 4.4 0.4 1.35 2.34 7.3 0.2 Decant Oil 0 0.26 2.84 0 12.9 0.4 1.80 2.84 8.3 0.5 The CTE of the cokes produced were excessiye fpr premium needle cokes to be used in making ultra high power graphite electrodes. The very high sulfur contents of the oils necessi¬ tated the high level of Cr*_0 addition, which reduced puffing to a satisfactory level, but increased the CTE to a point above the acceptable range for such an application. The cokes were suitable, however, for making graphite bodies and electrodes for less severe applications. EXAMPLE.13 Two samples of decant oils from another source were coked and tested as in Example 1 with the following results: % Cr 2 0 3 CO .e Pr< -.perties Added to CTE Samnle No. Feedstock. Ash. % S% 10 "7 /°C DP , % Δ L 893 0 0.18 1.05 1.6 6.9 893 0.1 0.63 1.14 2.9 0 363 Q 0.03 1.08 1.5 6.2 363 0.1 0.50 1.09 2.4 0 It is.eyident that the above, cokes haye. desirably.low CTE and dynamic puffing characteristics. EXAMPLE 14 The same fresh, f ed used. ' in Example 7 was tested as in Example 1 using the inhibitor at a higher level of addition, with the following results: Inhibitor Coke Properties Added to CTE Feedstock ιo- 7 /°c ' DP, % Δ L 0 2.9 8.3 Cr 2°3 (* °- 2%)* 4.2 0 The utility of Cr 0 in the aboye test is evident. In the aboye examples, it was noted that bodies produced from the cokes amenable to inhibition displayed expansion maxima at temperatures in the region of 2500-2600 C. Another advantage in the use of Cr O as compared to other inhibitors is shown in- the improvement in secondary puffing, wherein the expansion curve for Cr O inhibited cokes turns downward at temperatures of 2700 C and higher, while the Fe„0 inhibited cokes show a continued ex- pansion at this temperature. Some feedstocks may well need and be beneficially treated, with Cr O additions of as much as 0.5%, resulting in a 2% ash level of Cr O in the final coke. The examples above are not shown as limitations but * merely samples from the wide variety of * petroleum residues currently available. EXAMPLE 15 During ' operation of a pilot coker, it was obseryed t at Cr 0 , when injected into the " feed line, had segregated in the bottom in several pockets. Although it is known that space Velocity in a commercial coker is much higher than in a pilot coker, it was be¬ lieved that this might not be sufficient to maintain dispersion of Cr O uniform from top to bottom. Consequently, during the next run the Cr O dispersion was injected into the top of the coker O.V.FΓ A through. an anti-foam injector port as a 5% dispersion in slurry oil cut back 25% with. VM&P naphtha, making the ' . Cr-0 concentration 3.75% in the total additi-ye. - The. resulting ash. leyels were as follows, from vertical and.horizontal sections; Ash% Ash % Top 0.35 Outer edge. 0.29 Middle .0.28- Outer-mid 0..28 Bottom 0.31 Inter-mid 0.31 Center 0.34 ' Core 0.33 The calculated ash (Cr„0 ). in the coke was 0.35% on the basis of the injected amount, with these figures showing a uniform distri¬ bution of the Cr 0 in the coke produced. Tests for CTE and dynamic puffing confirmed that the coke produced was of excellent quality: DP No 2pph No additiye Additive e 2 £ 3 _ %,ΔL Top 5.2 5.5 Middle 5.2 5.9 +0.2% Bottom 5.3 6.7

Claims: Claims 1. In a process for the manufacture of non-puffing needle coke suitable for graphitization by delayed coking of petroleum feedstocks having a level of sulfur content combined jtiolecularly in components of said feedstock sufficiently high, enough, to con¬ tribute to an irreversible volumetric expansion of the coke on heating to a temperature of 1400 C or higher, the improvement com¬ prising the addition and dispersion of an effective, amount of a chromium compound into the feedstock prior to or during coking of the feedstock in a delayed coker. 2. In a process for the manufacture of non-puffing needle coke suitable for graphitization and having a graphite CTE charac¬ teristic of not over 7 x 10 / C over the range of 0 to 50 C by delayed coking of petroleum feedstocks having a level of sulfur content combined molecularly in components of said feedstock sufficiently high enough to contribute to an irreversible volu¬ metric expansion of the coke on heating to a temperature of 1400 C or higher, the improvement comprising the addition and dispersion of an effective amount of a finely divided chromium compound into the feedstock prior to or during coking of the feed¬ stock in a delayed coker. 3. The process of Claims 1 or 2 wherein from 0.05 to 0.5% of chromic oxide is added to the feedstock. 4. The process of Claims 1 or * 2 wherein from 0.Q5 to 0.5% of chromic oxide is added to the feedstock in the form of a predis- persed concentrate of said chromic oxide in a liquid medium, com¬ patible with said feedstock. 5. The.process of Claims. 1 or 2 wherein chromic oxide is used which has a particle size such that 1QQ%. of said chromic oxide particles are les than 5 microns and 70.%. are less than 2 microns in diameter. 6. The process of Claims 1 or 2 wherein the. άhromium com¬ pound is added in the form of naturally occuring chroiuite ore. 7. The process of Claims 1 or 2 wherein the chromium com- pound is dispersed in a portion of the coker feedstock.. 8.* The. rocess of Claims 1 or 2 wherein chromic oxide is produced in situ.by. the ' eat of calcination of a compound selected from the group of compounds yielding chromic oxide on hicjh. temperature calcination. 9. In a process for the ' anufacture of non-puffing needle coke suitable for graphitization and haying a graphite. CTE characteristic of not oyer 5 x 10 / C over the range of 0 to 50 C by delayed coking * from petroleum feedstocks having sulfur' molecularly combined in components of said feedstock in sufficient quantity to contribute to an irreversible volumetric expansion on heating to a temperature of 1400 C or higher, the improvement comprising selecting an effective amount of chromic oxide of — tr, particle size less than 5u ( . 5 x 10 m) . to be added to said feedstock, preferably 0.05 to 0.5% of said feedstock, dispersing said chromic oxide in a portion of said feedstock or other com¬ patible material to form a uniform dispersion of said chromic oxide, adding said dispersion to the principal portion of said feedstock through the top of a delayed coker and coking said feedstock.

Inventors: GRINDSTAFF L, HSU H, WHITTAKER M
Applicants: GREAT LAKES CARBON CORP
Application year: 1981
Main classification: C10G9
IPC codes: C10B55