ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH INDIRECT PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION

Abstract: An improved technique for the measurement of ions in so­ lution where the ions of interest are chromatographically dis­ placed from an ion exchange column by an eluting ion which is or is made light-absorbing, and where the eluted sample ions, which are transparent (at the monitored wavelength), are de­ tected and quantified from the decrements they cause in efflu­ ent absorbance as revealed by photometric monitoring.

Description: ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH INDIRECT PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION The invention relates to the field of ion exchange chromatography and particularly to an improved detection scheme for use therein. The solution of ion analysis problems by liquid chromatography is often complicated by limitations in the capability to detect the eluted sample ions in the column effluent. An example is the problem of analyzing the many inorganic and organic ions that are non-light-absorbing. Whereas the separation of such "transparent" ions may be conveniently effected on ion exchange resin columns, their detection and measurement by conventional photometric means is ineffective since they are optically indistinguishable from the transparent eluents commonly used in the art. Hence, current and conventional practice teaches that photometers are useful only where the ions to be determined either contain chromophores or can generate chromophores through post-column reactions with appropriate reagents. A second field of background art of interest to the invention is Ion Chromatography (IC). Ion Chromatography comprises a two column arrangement followed by a conductance detector. The first column serves to separate the ions of interest while the second column, "the suppressor", serves to lower the conductance of the eluent while not significantly affecting the conductance of the eluted sample species. The suppressor column in IC disadvantageously becomes exhausted in the course of normal usage and must be periodically regenerated or replaced - usually regenerated. Whereas the regeneration step has been automated in commercial instruments so that it is less obtrusive, it would nevertheless be desirable for the following reasons, to develop single column (suppressorless) methods for the many ions that lack chromophores: (1) Reduced complexity of the instrumentation and operation. This is an important factor in the process control area where the demands for unattended and relatively maintenance-free operation are most essential; (2) Faster analysis due to void space elimination, and less loss of resolution since the suppressor column contributes to peak broadening; (3) Less alteration in calibration with usage. In Ion Chromatography, such changes can arise for ions whose elution behavior depends on the degree of exhaustion of the suppressor; (4) Elimination of detrimental suppressor column side reactions, with resulting broader sample species applications; and (5) Eluent recycle capability and elimination of suppressor column regenerant. There are other areas in which the invention provides important advances. Of particular importance is the ability to determine ions by flow analysis for which past IC and photometric methods show relatively poor sensitivity. Carbonate determination is an example that is demonstrated specifically herein, and for which both IC and photometric methods are generally not suited. Another significant improvement is achieved in the area of calibration procedures. Most IC methods, as well as most methods of analysis, generally rely on a calibration procedure wherein the user establishes experimentally the relationship between peak height or peak area response and the amount of sample species injected. Each species has a response factor which is characteristic for that species and usually different from that of other species. This requires that response factors be determined for all species of interest. In -contrast, in practicing the invention, it has been discovered that a number of ions will have a common response factor. This obviously and beneficially simplifies instrument operation. The invention relates to an improved method for the flow analysis of photometrically differentiable sample and non-sample ions in a solution of photometrically monitorable liquid effluent wherein, generally, sample which is in or placed in solution is contacted with a flow-through ion exchange medium and anion or alternatively cation sample ions are exchanged at the active ion exchange sites thereof, and eluted through said ion exchange medium using a liquid eluent which contains displacing ions which displace sample ions off the ion exchange medium, eventually causing displaced sample ions to appear in the effluent of the ion exchange medium, the improvement which comprises using eluent containing light-absorbing displacing ions which are or are made detectably light-absorbing in said effluent, photometrically monitoring said effluent using light which is detectably absorbed by said light-absorbing displacing ions and which photometrically distinguishes transient sample ions sufficiently to produce an effluent absorbance response proportional to the variable concentration of the monitored light-absorbing displacing ions in the effluent, and indirectly determining the concentration of displaced sample ions of interest eluting off the ion exchange medium based on the fluctuation(s) caused by same in the effluent absorbance response as detected by the photometric monitoring step. In samples of mixed cation or anion species, where data is desired respecting the concentration of individual species, the ion exchange medium is selected to produce a chromatographic separation of cation or anion species, whichever is of interest, using displacing ions which differentially displace sample ions off the separating medium, causing the displaced ions to appear chromatographically resolved in the effluent of the separated medium and in a form whereby all or selected ion species of interest may be individually quantified indirectly according to the inventive practice. A basic feature of the invention is in the use of light (usually U.V.) absorbing eluents which essentially include light-absorbing ions, i.e., said displacing ions, of the same charge (but not necessarily same valence) as the ions to be separated. These light-absorbing displacing ions have a dual role of: (1) selectively displacing the sample ions from the chromatographic column or ion exchange medium, and (2) revealing the sample ions in the effluent. This dual functionality is recognized by the term "monitoring/displacing", and, in this respect, departs from characteristic eluents used in prior techniques which employed the displacing function, but not the monitoring function. The monitoring function takes unique advantage of the fact that the concentration of light-absorbing displacing ions in the ion exchange effluent varies inversely with the concentration of displaced sample ions eluting off the ion exchange medium and that this relationship or phenomenon may be applied through effluent absorbance monitoring to quite accurately determine, in a very convenient and in an indirect fashion, the concentration of displaced sample ions of interest. The monitoring/displacing function may be obtained by way of either (a) the selection of critical displacing ions inherently possessing the proper dual functionality, or alternatively (b) ions made to possess that functionality by a conversion step during the analytical experiment, e.g., such as by use of a post-column reaction effective to convert displacing ions in the effluent to a photometrically "visible" species. Specifically, the invention includes the selection of critical light-absorbing displacing ions and the preparation of eluent solutions possessing a sufficient quantity of such critical ions such that an effective chromatographic displacement of the sample ions is achieved within practical and operable time limits (sometimes with the assist of a major or minor amount of non-light-absorbing displacing ions optionally added to prepare optimum forms of eluent respecting specific separations) and such that the critical ions are present in sufficient quantity to produce detectable light absorbance in the ion exchange effluent. Since the concentration of the light-absorbing displacing ions in the ion exchange effluent varies inversely to the concentration of displaced sample ions, the appearance of displaced sample ions in the effluent is revealed by fluctuations in the effluent absorbance. These fluctuations are most generally in the form of decrements or dips or troughs appearing in the absorbance base line, at the intervals expected for the consecutive elution of the sample ion species. The dips or troughs reveal that the concentration of the light-absorbing displacing ions have given way to an increase in displaced sample ions which appear in transient fashion in the effluent corresponding to their respective elution times, producing a temporary "void" of light-absorbing displacing ions. The extent of the void (or the reduction in the concentration of the monitored eluent ions) indirectly reveals the concentration of displaced sample ions causing the void". Whether the sample ions are greater or lesser light absorbers than the displacing ions, determines generally whether a "dip" or "peak" is registered in the absorbance response. Since strong light-absorbing sample ions may be determined quite easily by conventional photometric detection, the invention has its greatest application in the quantitative analysis of heretofore difficult "transparent" sample ion species which produce the mentioned characteristic dip in the effluent absorbance as detected by photometric monitoring. Where a post-column reaction is employed, the principle is unchanged, except the invention envisions that the photometric detectability of the displacing ions is a feature either achieved, or enhanced, by a conversion step occurring most often in the effluent stream between the separating medium and the photometric detector. In photometric analysis, it has been known to use such reactions to produce detectable or visible sample ions. The technique as used here, however, is substantially different in concept in that the sample ions are unaffected in order to retain optimum transparent or "non-visible'1 characteristics. In contrast, the displacing ion form is modified to take on or to enhance its light absorbance properties at the monitored wavelength(s) or wavelength band, whereby a depletion or reduction of such displacing ions in the effluent can be monitored with good efficiency. Hence, the "transparency" of the sample ions is critical to the invention, and departs substantially from the photometric monitoring techniques and schemes proposed in the area of prior photometric detection methods having the opposite purpose of making sample ions of interest visible. The separating medium used in the analytic methods and apparatus of the invention is an ionexchange material or medium, of any type effective, in separating ionic species in combination with eluents containing displacing ions. This area of the prior art is well developed, and may be called upon for a range of materials useful in conjunction with the invention. The materials may be either in the form of "packings" (the current most preferred form), or may be of such other form as can be usefully applied to achieve sample ion separations by the principle of ion-exchange elution chromatography. Exemplary of the latter is the use of hollow fiber membranes or capillary tubes to perform separations with the aid of eluents of the basic type specified herein (i.e., eluents containing displacing ions). The medium is also sometimes referred to herein more broadly as an "ion exchange medium" in connection with samples or types of analysis which do not require a chromatographic resolution, e.g., certain forms of total ion analysis. It may nevertheless comprise beneficially the same materials as where a resolution of species is required or practiced. The liquid eluent is normally prepared using as the solvent deionized water. Other highly polar solvents known for ion exchange chromatography such as the lower alcohols of 1-4 carbon atoms, may be admixed with water or used solely to dissolve the electrolyte component(s). It is necessary, of course, to select eluent solvents, which permit the light-absorbing displacing ion concentration of the eluent (in the effluent of the ion exchange medium) to be photometrically determined. The selection of the photometric detector is chosen according to the wavelength(s) or wavelength band being monitored, and is thus selected depending on the light absorbance characteristics of the displacing ions. More specifically, visible or U.V. photometric detectors of the various types known in the art, for use with liquid chromatography, can be suitably applied to applications involving the invention. It is not absolutely essential that the sample ions be transparent at all wavelengths. It is required only that the same be nonabsorbing at the select wavelength(s) or wavelength band monitored; or alternatively, of characteristically different absorbance, vis-a-vis the displacing or monitored ions, at the monitored wavelength(s), such that the presence of sample ions, reducing the concentration of the displacing ions in the effluent, produces a fluctuation in the absorbance base line which is proportional to the reduction of monitored displacing ions. The fluctuation must, of course, be sufficient to quantify, at the desired sensitivity level, the concentration of sample ions of interest, based on the departure from base line absorbance levels. Further features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description when considered together with the accompanying Drawings wherein: Figure 1 is a schematic view of an apparatus for performing ion exchange chromatography with indirect photometric detection in accordance with the principles and teachings of the present invention; Figure 2 is a circuit diagram showing the electronic interface between the apparatus of Figure 1 and a visual reader such as a strip chart recorder and/or integrator; Figures 3 and 4 are exaggerated diagrammatic views for illustration of the principle of separation and detection practiced by the invention. Figures 5 and 6 are representative of the appearance of photometrically derived chromatograms using the method of the invention. Figures 7 through 16 are illustrations of various chromatograms together with a calibration graph, developed using the method of the invention. Referring to apparatus illustrated in Figure 1, there is shown a chromatographic separating means comprising a chromatographic column 10 which is packed with an ion-exchange separating medium (not shown) in the form of pellicular or micro-particulate ion-exchange resins. The invention may also employ, however, any other form of ion-exchange separating medium useful in separating cations or anions, such as capillary tubes or separating medium useful to perform ion separations by eluting a sample therethrough using an eluent which contains displacing ions. Column 10 is connected to a photometric detector 12, preferably a flow-through U.V. photometer with micro-volume cell design for liquid chromatographic applications. For visible light, the photometer may be modified to incorporate a tungsten lamp light source. The analytical stream is ultimately dispelled from the photometer to waste vessel 14 or to a recycle or return line 16, whereby the spent eluent/sample is returned to a reservoir 18 containing a supply of eluent or mobile phase. The return to the reservoir of the eluent is considered a unique feature of the invention permitted by the fact that the sample species in the eluent is insignificant for a number of subsequent analyses. A sample is added into the apparatus through injection valve 20 and is swept through the apparatus by eluent solution containing light-absorbing ions. The eluent solution 22 is conveyed by a pump 24, monitored by a pressure gauge 26, and is then passed through the sample injection valve 20 to column 10. The eluent solution may also be added manually to column 10 as by pouring the solution from a container into an open end of the column. However, the solution is preferably added in a continuous stream to obtain greater uniformity and reproducibility of results. The solution leaving column 10 with the ionic species resolved is conveyed by a conduit to the photometric detector. In the photometric detector, the presence of light-absorbing, displacing ions in the effluent produces an electrical signal proportional to the amount of such ions present in the effluent. The signal is directed from the detector to a visual recorder such as a strip chart recorder 28, which continually reproduces the detector signal. The decrements (or troughs) observed in the base line absorbance are ultimately related to sample ion species, to produce sample species concentration data as is described more fully below. The apparatus of the invention preferably includes a sample injection valve controller 30, which automates the operation of the injection valve, and which is also used to superimpose a transient signal on the detector output to recorder 28 to mark the strip chart with a spike to indicate the injection event. A further optional feature of the apparatus is an electronic interface module 32 which is adapted to: (1) provide additional base line biasing voltage to offset the elevated detector base line that exists because of the use of absorbing displacing ions, and (2) provide impedance buffering to interface multiple types of recorders to various photometric detectors regardless of their peculiar input/output specifications. Referring to the electrical diagram shown in Figure 2, the electronic interface module comprises high-performance operational amplifiers, 40 through 46 which are operated by a power supply (not shown). Amplifier 40 is connected through electrical lead 48 to the detector output terminal. The output signal originating in the detector is transmitted through amplifier 40 without amplification and with impedance buffering to avoid overloading of the detector output circuit. A potentiometer 50 operated in a voltage divider mode is used to select a biasing reference voltage of between 0 and -5 V DC, which is transmitted to amplifier 42 operating in the same mode as amplifier 40. A positive voltage signal from amplifier 40 and a negative voltage signal from amplifier 42 are combined at junction 52 to produce a voltage that equals one-half the sum of the combined amplifier outputs. Resistors 54, 56 provide current limiting functionality in accordance with standard practice. The combined signal is transmitted through a low pass filter comprising resistor 58 and capacitor 60 to remove high frequency noise. The signal is conducted to amplifier 44 which is again arranged in a non-inverting mode, whereby the signal from amplifiers 40, 42 is doubled through the selection of equal value resistors 62 and 64. The resulting output signal from amplifier 44 reduces, without net amplification, the detector output on a suppressed or reduced base line level, i.e., the detector output is compensated for without affecting small order base line disturbances, and may then be fed directly to a conventionally designed strip chart recorder through lead 66. The amplifier 46 may be optionally employed to receive output signal from amplifier 44 and convert this signal to a form whereby the same may be. used to operate signal processors which require relatively high input voltage levels, e.g., an integrator or microcomputer. To this end, the input signal to amplifier 46 is processed in a non-inverting mode that yields an amplification factor of 100 through the selection of the ratio of resistors 68 and 70. A capacitor 72 is connected in the circuit to remove high frequency output components in the signal. The amplified signal is conducted by lead 74 to the integrator or similar device. For the purposes of illustrating anion analysis, Figure 3 is a depiction of an anion exchange medium (stationary phase) in the operating condition of being pumped and equilibrated with mobile phase or liquid eluent comprising C+ E electrolyte, where C+is the co-ion to a light-absorbing displacing eluent anion E . At the conclusion of the equilibration, the active ion exchange sites of the ion exchange medium are theoretically occupied exclusively by light-absorbing eluent anions E . A concentration monitor capable of sensing all ionic species and placed at the outlet of the ion exchange column would thus reveal a steady level of C+ and E if the feed concentration of the eluent is maintained constant as shown in the photometrically derived chromatogram of Figure 5. Upon injection of a sample electrolyte denoted C+ S (Figure 4), the sample anion S is chromatographically retarded by attraction to the active ion exchange sites of the stationary phase and will exit in the ion exchange effluent at a characteristic elution volume determined by such factors generally as the capacity of the exchange medium, the concentration of the eluent and the affinity of the ion exchange sites or stationary phase for S relative to E . These factors are well known in the art. The invention is based on the principle that accompanying the appearance of S sample ions in the effluent, there must be a concerted and equivalent change in the concentration of E light absorbing displacing ions. This relationship is predetermined by the principles of electro-neutrality and equivalence of exchange which require that the total equivalent concentrations of anions (S and E ) must remain fixed since the concentration of co-ions C+is fixed. Consequently, by monitoring effluent absorbance under conditions which permit the light-absorbing displacing ions to be photometrically distinguished from the sample, fluctuations are produced in the effluent absorbance signal as the concentration of the monitored displacing ions periodically gives way to eluting sample ions in the effluent. In the case of transparent sample ions, or sample ions of lesser absorbance than the displacing ions, a characteristic dip is accordingly observed in the effluent absorbance as illustrated in the chromatogram of Figure 6 from which an accurate determination of sample anion concentration can be made. Cation analysis is essentially identical in principle using as the stationary phase a suitable and equilibrated cation ion exchange medium, and as the mobile phase, electrolyte supplying light-absorbing cations as the displacing ions. The sensitivity of detection will be determined in larger part by how the trough depth (or peak height) compares to base line noise. Hence, the larger the fractional disturbance in base line caused by the sample, the greater the precision. Mathematical analysis generally shows that the precision in determining trough depth, and hence the sensitivity of detection, will be improved the lower the concentration of eluent employed. However, there is a practical limit to how low the concentration of the eluent may be used since too low a concentration will impose long run times and loss of sensitivity due to band spreading. Ideally, the run time should be no longer than the time necessary for adequate resolution of the peaks. Sample concentration also predetermines the strength of the eluent concentration. Basically, the source of this limitation resides in the inability of the eluent to satisfactorily displace sample ions at a higher concentration than the displacing ions of the eluent. Using relatively small dilute samples, (10 to 10 molar) experience has generally established that most workable displacing ion concentration in the eluent will be in the range of about 10-1 to 10'6 molar. Since the elution of sample ions is revealed by monitoring the absorbance level of the eluent, the optical absorbance of the eluent (in the effluent) must also be sufficiently greater than noise to insure sensitive detection of the eluted species. This in turn calls for the use of light-absorbing displacing ions of high molar extinction coefficients since dilute eluent solutions are ordinarily used in typical analysis. From experience, a desirable level of optical density is in the range of from 0.01 to 3, and preferably from 0.5 to 1.5 absorbance units at the monitored wavelength(s) or wavelength band. Preferred eluents are thus selected on the combined basis of capability to elute sample ions within practical times, and adequate optical density. The monitoring/displacing function can be found in ions with aromaticity. The aromaticity leads to high molar extinction coefficients in the U.V. and confers on the ions a relatively high affinity for the ion exchange separating mediums commonly used. For anion separations, specifically phthalate, trimesate (1,3,5 benzene tricarboxylate), toluene sulfonate, and benzene disulfonate are preferred for use as light absorbing displacing ions - the phthalate especially so. With respect to the trimesate at pH 10, an exceptional sensitivity is observed relative to temperature changes in the column. Where such is manifested, the column is desirably encased in thermostated jacket, e.g., a circulating water jacket, maintained at a constant temperature. For cation separations, suitable eluents may be prepared using electrolyte solutions of pyridinium halides such as pyridinium chloride and bipyridinium dissociable compounds such as 4,4'-bipyridinium dihydrochloride (preferred for divalent cation separations) as the light-absorbing cation. Divalent copper such as copper sulfate and aromatic quaternary ammonium ions such as are obtained from the dissolution of benzyl trimethyl ammonium bromide are also suitable for cation separations and indirect photometric detection. Anion separations may also be performed using a non-light-absorber such as thiocyanate ion to which may be added, such as by constant flow addition to the ion exchange effluent, ferric ion to produce a visible species for photometric monitoring purposes. Similarly, protonated polyamine ions, such as ethylene diamine or di ethylene amine may be used for cation separations and complexed with divalent copper ion under controlled pH conditions for photometric detection. Alternatively, and as an illustrative example only, divalent copper may be used for cation separations, and complexed with a polyamine additive for enhanced photometric detectability. In addition to the displacing electrolyte, the eluent solution may also require buffer ions added to control either the valence of the monitor-displacing ion or the sample ions or both. The monitor-displacing ion may occasionally act as its own buffer. In addition, the displacing electrolyte may incorporate a major or minor portion of non-light-absorbing ions added for displacing functionality but which lack monitoring properties. The eluting power of the eluent may thus be derived solely from the monitor displacing ion or shared between the monitored ion and other ions in the system. Ion exchange separating media used with the described eluent systems are'preferably (for anion separations) the low specific capacity, surface agglomerated form of anion exchange resin as described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,101,460 and 4,119,580. Either a surface agglomerated form of low specific capacity cation exchange resin such as in the above-identified patents, or low specific capacity surface sulfonated cation exchange resin beads in a non-agglomerated form as described in U.S. Patent No. 3,966,596 can be suitably employed for cation separations. The preferred separating media and eluent parameters are most suited to typical case analysis of dilute relatively small samples, in turn, beneficially calling for dilute eluent electrolytes and low specific capacity forms of separating media. Directly injected more concentrated or larger samples can be analyzed according to the method of the invention using corresponding stronger eluents and higher capacity separating media, as required in accordance with the principles of ion exchange chromatography. In any practice of the method of the invention, the optical density of the monitored ion is adjusted, e.g., by wavelength selection, to achieve a desirable optical density level to insure sensitive detection. Example 1 Two 2.8 x 250 mm Altex glass columns packed with a surface agglomerated resin form of separating medium are prepared according to the method of U.S. Patent 4,119,580, using as the substrate, 8 percent cross-linked styrene divinyl benzene strong acid cation exchange resin (BioRade AG-50WX8, 37-44 pm Na+ form resin); and as the anion exchange latex deposit, a latex prepared by contacting polyvinyl benzyl chloride latex resin, containing about 5 weight percent divinylbenzene cross-linking agent, with excess dimethylethanolamine to form latex particles with active anion exchange sites. The latex is characterized as having a volume average diameter of about 0.6 micron. The packed columns are connected in series and eluent is pumped through the column at a rate of 2 mls/min. The eluent is 10 3 M disodium ortho-phthalate (pH = 7.8). A sample injection valve with a 20 pl sample loop, is used to inject a sample to the head of the columns. The outlet of the columns is coupled to an LDC Model 1203 U.V. detector operating at a wavelength of 254 nm. The output stage of the detector is connected to the above-described electronic suppressor 32, which impresses a voltage potential counter to that developed by the detector. The resulting suppressed output signal is applied to a Linear Model 156 strip chart recorder. Eluent is pumped through the columns until the effluent absorbance is stable and equal to that of the eluent (1.124 absorbance units). The sensitivity of the detector is then set at 0.064 absorbance units full scale (A.U.F.S.) and the background suppressor circuit of the detector is adjusted so that the base line response on the recorder (set at 10 mv full scale) reads about 90-100 percent of full scale. A sample solution of 10 3 M sodium chloride is injected and the recorder solid line trace of Figure 7 is obtained - trough 1 being a disturbance at the void volume of the column while trough 2 at approximately 7.4 mls is due to elution of the chloride ion. Further elutions of solutions of other anions give troughs at the following volumes of effluent: Bromide 25.8 mls Nitrate 29.4 Sulfate 43.2 " Phosphate 7.05 Carbonate 3.3 " Nitrite 9.6 Chlorate 30.3 Monochloro Acetate 3.9 Dichloro Acetate 10.5 Trichloro Acetate 57.0 This Example serves to illustrate two important features of the invention: (1) that ions may be resolved; and (2) that they are detectable in the column effluent. Example 2 - Separation of Ions Eluent is pumped through the columns of Example 1 at a rate of 2 mls/min with the eluent having a slightly different composition of - 10 3 M disodium ortho-phthalate and + 10 3 M boric acid adjusted to pH 9 with sodium hydroxide. Injections of the following mixtures are made and the chromatograms of Figures 8 through 10 are obtained. 2 x 10-3 N Chloride -3 Sample 5 x 10 N Phosphate Chromatogram Mixture A 5 x 10-3 N Nitrate Fig. 8 5 x 10-3 N Sulfate 2 x 10-3 M Chloride -3 Sample 5 x 10 3 M Bromide Chromatogram Mixture B 5 x 10-3 M Nitrate Fig. 9 5 x 10-3 M Sulfate -3 Sample 5 x 10 3 M Sulfate Chromatogram Mixture C 5 x 10-3 M Oxalate Fig. 10 Example 3 - Calibration Eluent is pumped through the columns at a rate of 2 mls/min with the eluent having a composition of 10 3 disodium ortho-phthalate + 10 3 boric acid adjusted to pH 8. The effluent absorbance when the columns reach equilibrium is 1.083 A.U. Various mixtures of nitrate, sulfate and phosphate are injected (20 1 injections) and the depths of their resulting troughs are measured. The sensitivity (A.U.F.S.) of the detector and the background suppressor are adjusted so as to keep the troughs on scale. The results are as follows: TABLE I Trough Depth Sensitivity (Cm) Sample Composition (A.U.F.S.) PO43- NO3- SO425 x 10-3 N PO4-3, NO3-, SO42- .032 12.6 11 5.9 2.5 x 10-3 N " " " .032 6.4 5.45 3.0 1 x 10-3 N " " " .016 4.85 4.4 2.36 1 x 10-3 N " " " .008 9.8 8.8 4.9 TABLE I (con'd) Trough Depth Corrected for Sensitivity Sample Composition PO43- NO3- SO425 x 10-3 N PO4-3, NO3-, SO42- 12.6 11 5.9 2.5 x 10-3 N " " " 6.4 5.45 3.0 1 x 10-3 N " " " 2.42 2.2 1.18 1 x 10-3 N " " " 2.45 2.2 1.22 Calibration curves for the three ions are shown in Figure 11 where it can be seen that at least over this limited range of concentration there is a close to linear dependence of trough depth to the amount of ion injected. Example 4 - Common Response Factors The experimental conditions of Example 3 are used in this example and separate injections made of sodium nitrate, sodium sulfate and sodium phosphate The purpose of this experiment is to establish how trough area depends on the ion injected. Lacking a suitable operating integrator, trough area is approximated by measuring the weight of chart paper contained in the troughs. Results: TABLE 2 Wt. of Trough (mgm) Wt. of Trough Corrected for /meq/l of Chart Speed Ion Injected 5 x 10 3 M Sodium Nitrate 117.5 23.5 2.5 x 10 @ M Sodium Sulfate 110.8 22.2 1.67 x 10 @ M Sodium Phosphate 80.4 24.1 The area of the trough/equivalent of ion is approximately independent of the ion injected for these three ions. On the basis of this observation, it would be expected that anions of strong acids (pK < 4) would as a general matter adhere to this rule. Anions of acids with medium to high pK's should give responses determined by their valence at the ambient pH of the eluent. Phosphate, for example, exists predominantly as the HYPO4 2 species at pH 8 so that one mole of phosphate injected would be expected to displace two equivalents of monitor ion. The data of Table 2 supports this expectation. Example 5 - Different Monitor Ions (A) A single column is prepared in the manner of Example 1 and eluent is pumped through the column at a rate of 2 mls/min with a solution of 2 x 10 3 M sodium toluene sulfonate and 10'3 M boric acid adjusted to pH 8. The toluene sulfonate ion is the monitor ion and the major displacing ion. Samples containing various anions are injected and elution volumes determined as follows: Carbonate 3.45 mls Chloride 7.8 Nitrite 10.5 Chlorate 31.8 Phosphate 58.8 Monochloro Acetate 4.05 Dichloro Acetate 11.6 (B) Eluent is pumped through a single column prepared in the manner of Example 1 at a rate of 2 mls/min with the eluent containing trimesate ion as displacing/monitor ion. Elution volumes of various ions are determined as follows: Elution Volumes (mls) in Trimesate in Trimesate Anion Injected Eluent X* Eluent Y* Chloride 1.57 1.37 Sulfate 2.18 1.75 Iodide 23.1 9.7 Thiocyanate 17.4 14 Perchlorate > 30 32 Dichloro Acetate 1.65 1.55 Trichloro Acetate 3.65 3.06 Citrate 7.2 4.52 Pyrophosphate 8.4 5.6 X* = 2.5 x 10 4 M trisodium trimesate; 10 @ M boric acid - pH = 7.2 = = 5 x 10 M trisodium trimesate; 10 3 M boric acid - pH = 7.4 This example illustrates how more tightly held ions such as thiocyanate, perchlorate and citrate may be effectively displaced by a more potent displacing ion such as the trimesate ion which is also the monitor ion. In Ion- Chromatography, these more tightly held ions are usually displaced in conveniently short times by increasing the concentration of the eluent. This can greatly reduce the interval between successive suppressor exhaustions which is an inconvenience. The invention does not suffer from that drawback. Example 6 - Reference Cell Suppression A sample of 10 3 molar of each of sodium nitrite and sodium chloride and 2 x 10 3 molar of each of sodium bromide and sodium nitrate is injected into a 4.1 x 250 mm stainless steel column packed with a surface agglomerated form of anion exchange resin as described in Example 1, except substituting as the substrate, Dowexe 50x8 20 m, Na+ form cation exchange resin. Eluent of 10 3 molar disodium ortho-phthalate + 10 3 molar boric acid, adjusted to pH 8, is pumped at a rate of 2 ml/min through the column, and by way of a stream splitter T-fitting, is simultaneously pumped at a rate of about 1.25 ml/min to the reference cell of an LDC 1203 photometer set at 254 nm. An illustration of the resulting chromatogram is shown in Figure 1Z. This alternative use of reference cell suppression (to electronic suppression), can be beneficial when alternating the sensitivity of the photometric detector between or during analysis runs. Reference cell suppression also beneficially adjusts for drifts in base line absorbance caused by eluent factors, and would be desirably used when spent eluent is recycled to the eluent reservoir. Example 7 - Further Anions An Altex photometric detector, Model 153 is set at a wavelength of 254 nm and operates with reference cell suppression. A pump feeds eluent directly from the eluent reservoir to the reference cell of the detector. The detector is used under the following varied "Conditions" A through F for anion analysis. Common conditions are column size, 4.1 x 250 mm; eluent pumping rate, 2 ml/min; and resin type (the Example 7 agglomerated anion form resin). The resin type is varied, however, in the volume average diameter (VAD) of the latex particles attached to a common form substrate (Dowexe 50x8), as detailed below: Condition Latex VAD Eluent A 0.6 micron 10-3 3 M Sodium trimesate; 10-3 M Boric Acid:pH = 9 B " " 5 x 10-4 M Sodium trimesate: 10 3 M Boric acid:pH = 9 C " " 2.5 x 10-4 M Sodium trimesate; 10-3 M Boric acid:pH = 9 D " " 10 3 M Disodium ortho-phthalate: 10 3 M Boric acid:pH = 9 E 0.4 micron F 0.09 Table 3 summarizes the results achieved, in terms of elution volumes of various tested anion species, using the eluent/separating medium Combinations A-F described above. TABLE 3 ELUTION VOLUMES OF ANIONS Elution Volume (mls) Ion A B C D E F Void 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.1 Acetate e.i.v. -- -- 3.2 3.4 e.i.v. Azide 7.2 -- -- 55 25 6.1 Bromate 3.4 -- -- 14 8.75 3.15 Bromide 9 10.4 10.3 69 30 7.3 Carbonate 2.7 2.6 2.95 6.5 5.3 2.5 Chlorate 8.8 10.2 12.1 86 35 8.25 Chloride 3.9 4.20 4.95 17.1 10.3 3.4 Mono-Chloroacetate 2.75 2.76 3.16 8.0 6.2 2.6 Di-Chloroacetate 4.6 -- -- 27.5 15.6 4.4 Tri-Chloroacetate 14.6 16.5 20 t t 15.0 Citrate 14.7 26.8 52 t t t Cyanate -- -- -- 6.5 5.25 2.3 Dithionate 5.3 -- -- -- -- 14.0 Fluoride e.i.v. -- e.i.v. 3.0 3.2 e.i.v. Fumarate -- -- -- -- 91 17.3 TABLE 3 (Continued) Elution Volumes (mls) Ion A B C D E F Glycolate e.i.v. -- -- 3.4 3.45 e.i.v. Iodate e.i.v. -- -- 3.8 3.8 e.i.v. Iodide 55 -- -- -- -- 45 Maleate 4.0 -- -- 78 53 11 Malonate 3.8 -- -- 62 44 9.4 Nitrate 9.1 -- 12.6 84 34 8.2 Nitrite 4.5 -- -- 24.1 17.0 4.0 Oxalate 5.75 -- -- -- -- 16.0 Perchlorate t -- -- -- -- t Persulfate 4.8 -- -- -- 68 13.4 o-Phosphate 3.1 -- -- 7.5 24.6 6.3 Propionate e.i.v. -- -- 3.3 3.4 e.i.v. Pyrophosphate 51 -- -- -- -- - Succinate 3.3 -- -- 47 36 7.9 Sulfate 5.0 6.45 9.4 114 67 14 Sulfite -- -- -- 86 -- - Tartarate 4.9 -- -- -- -- - Thiocyanate 86 -- -- -- -- t e.i.v. = Eluted in void trough. t = Very large; experiment terminated before species eluted. Example 8 - Separation and Detection of Cations This experiment illustrates the separation and detection of mixed sodium and calcium ions, using as the eluent, an aqueous solution of 5 x 10 3 M pyridine adjusted to pH 4.5 by the addition of HCl. Weakly basic pyridine is thus converted to cationic pyridinium ion (pKa 5.25) with the dual role of displacing ion in the separating column and monitor ion in the W detector. The chromatographic column is a commercially available Whatman Partisil-lO SCX s.s. column of 250 mm length and 4.6 mm I.D. Its 10 micron particle packing is a silica gel with siloxane-bonded sulfonic acid functional groups. The eluent is pumped at a rate of 2 mls/min (2,350 psig) consecutively through a sample valve (20 microliter injection), Partisil-SCX column and Perkin -Elmer Model 75 HPLC/UV detector set for 265 nm analysis wavelength. This chromatographic combination produces baseline resolution of sodium and calcium, with the sodium trough appearing at 10 mls, and the calcium trough at 18 mls (see Figure 13). Separation of monovalent ions would be expected to improve with high performance surface latex agglomerated resins as described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,101,460 and 4,119,580. Example 9 - Eluent Effects on the Detection Limits This Example is used to illustrate the effect various eluents have on detection limits of a given sample standard of mixed alkali metal cations. The experiment uses as the separating medium, a low specific capacity cation exchange resin prepared by the surface sulfonation of 2 percent cross-linked sytrene divinyl benzene copolymer resin, 180-400 U.S. standard mesh size, using 5 minutes reaction time of preheated (930C) resin in preheated (930C) concentrated sulfuric acid, followed by rapid quenching in deionized water (the method of U.S. Patent 3,966,596). The experiment uses the following common conditions: Eluent flow rate: 2 ml/min Column: 9 x 235 mm Wt % Molarity Sample: 20pi 425 ppm LiCl 10 2 585 ppm NaCl 10-2 745 ppm KC1 10 2 1210 ppm RbCl 10 2 1685 ppm CsBr 10-2 Table 4 below defines the variable conditions of the experiment also giving the calculated detection limit for each resolved cation species using the criterion of a signal/noise ratio of 2. In addition, the resulting chromatogram, using the preferred pyridinium chloride eluent is reproduced in the drawing as Figure 14 and illustrates the favorable separation of the K Rb and Cs ion species from Na and Li TABLE 4 Eluent and Molarity 2.5 x 10 3M 10 3M 5 x 10-3M benzyltri- copper pyridinium methyl ammon- sulfate chloride ium bromide Analysis Wavelength and Baseline 260 nm 275 nm 267 nm Absorbance 0.70 A.U. 0.46 A.U. 1.00 A.U. Detection Limit (ppm) Li+ ---(1) ---(1) ---(1 Na+ 3.4 ---(1) ---(1) K+ ---(1) 146 16.2 Rb+ 12.4 321 35.6 + Cs 15.4 395 43.8 (1) co-eluting species Example 10 - Separation and Detection of Divalent Cations This experiment illustrates the separation and detection of tightly bound divalent cations using an eluent of high displacing power, comprising a solution of 5 x 10-3M 4,41-bipyridinium dihydrochloride in deionized water. Two samples are analyzed, specifically, a sample of 10 2M of each of copper chloride, magnesium chloride and calcium chloride; and a sample of 10 N of each of cobaltous chloride and calcium chloride. The analysis wavelength is set at 307.2 nm using the further conditions of analysis described with respect to Example 9. Base line separation and detection of all divalent ion species is achieved. Reproductions of the chromatograms are shown in the drawing as Figures 15 and 16. The cause for an observed disturbance "A" between the Cu and Mg++ troughs of the Figure 15 chromatogram is not yet explained. Example 11 - Signal Optimization This experiment is to vary only the analysis wavelength, and thus the base line absorbance, and observe the effect on the detection limit. The detection limit is defined as that concentration of sample giving a trough depth only twice as large as the noise or a signal -to-noise ratio of 2. "Detection limit" is equivalent to "sensitivity". Conditions of the experiment are as follows: Eluent: 5 x 10 3 M pyridinium chloride, buffered to pH 4.5 using HCl Flow Rate: 2 cc/min Column: Partisil-lO SCX from Whatman (&num;IE 3586) 250 x 4.6 mm, microparticulate 10 micron silica gel packing with sulfonic acid functional groups. (2,350 psig at 2 cc/min, 230C) 3 cc total column volume has 0.180 meq capacity. Sample: 20yQ of 250 ppm NaCl, 1000 ppm CaCl2 Detector: Perkin-Elmer LC-75 variable wavelength single beam visible/UV detector for liquid chroma tography; 8 microliter, 6 mm cell. The analysis wavelength is varied as shown in Table 5 of the recorded data below. Absorbance values are in relation to zero absorbance defined at 280 nm wavelength reference. TABLE 5 Signal Ca++ Noise Sensititivy Pyridinium 1000 ppm Trough Depth Trough to Trough x 2 Absorbance S/N # ( ) (A.U.) (A.U. x 10-4) (A.U. x 10-4) (ppm) 1. 2721 0.128 14 3 155 2. 2693 0.256 61 3 35.5 3. 2670 0.512 156 3 13.9 4. 2654 0.768 246 4 11.7 5. 2644 1.024 306 5 11.8 6. 2637 1.280 342 6 12.4 7. 2631 1.536 360 8 15.6 8. 2625 1.792 360 11 22.0 9. 2619 2.048 308 14 32.8 10. 2612 2.304 188 17 65.2 11. 2606 2.560 24 20 601 The experiment of Example 11 illustrates that sensitivity optimization is obtained by balancing the competing effects of noise, which increases with increasing base line absorbance; and in this case trough depth, which to an optimum value increases with base line absorbance increases, and thereafter diminishes. It also shows that over an absorbance range of about .5 to 1.5 absorbance units, sensitivity performance is essentially equivalently good.

Claims: EMI38.1 1. An improved method for the flow analysis of photometrically differentiable sample and non-sample ions in a solution of photometrically monitorable liquid effluent wherein, generally, sample which is in or placed in solution is contacted with a flow-through ion exchange medium and anion or alternatively cation sample ions are exchanged at the active ion exchange sites thereof, and eluted through said ion exchange medium using a liquid eluent which contains displacing ions which displace sample ions off the ion exchange medium, eventually causing displaced sample ions to appear in the effluent of the ion exchange medium, the improvement which comprises using eluent containing light-absorbing displacing ions which are or are made detectably light-absorbing in said effluent, photometrically monitoring said effluent using light which is detectably absorbed by said light-absorbing displacing ions and which photometrically distinguishes transient sample ions sufficiently to produce an effluent absorbance response proportional to the variable concentration of the monitored light-absorbing displacing ions in the effluent, and indirectly determining the concentration of displaced sample ions of interest eluting off the ion exchange medium based on the fluctuation(s) caused by same in the effluent absorbance response as detected by the photometric monitoring step. 2. An improved method for the chromatographic quantitative analysis of a plurality of ionic species, of the same charge, cation or anion, but not necessarily of the same valence, said method comprising: (a) contacting said plurality of ion species in solution with an ion exchange separating medium, the exchangeable ion form(s) of which is the same form, cation or anion, as said plurality of ion species, and which has been equilibrated by contact with the eluent of step (b), (b) eluting the separating medium with liquid eluent containing displacing ions of the same charge, cation or anion, but not necessarily same valence as the ion species of interest, and which eluent is effective to differentially remove sample ion species attracted to the active ion exchange sites of the separating medium, and to eventually cause sample ion species to appear chromatographically resolved in the effluent of the separating medium, said displacing ions comprising light-absorbing ions in sufficient concentration in the eluent to be detectably light-absorbing in the effluent of the separating medium, (c) photometrically monitoring the effluent of the separating medium at a wavelength(s) or wavelength band detectably absorbed by said displacing ions, at least certain of the resolved ion species being characterized as having no or sufficiently different light-absorbance than said light-absorbing displacing ions at the monitored wavelength(s) or wavelength band sufficient such that their presence in the effluent is revealed by quantifiable fluctuations in the effluent absorbance, and (d) quantifying a chromatographically resolved ion species of interest of step (c) based on the fluctuation caused by same in the effluent absorbance as revealed by said photometric monitoring step. 3. An improved method for the flow analysis of photometrically differentiable sample and non-sample ions in a solution of photometrically monitorable liquid effluent wherein, generally, sample which is in or placed in solution is contacted with a flow through ion exchange medium and plural anion or alternatively plural cation species comprising said sample are exchanged at the active ion exchange sites thereof, and eluted through said ion exchange medium using a liquid eluent which contains displacing ions which differentially displace sample ion species off the ion exchange medium, eventually causing displaced sample ion species to appear chromatographically resolved in the effluent of the ion exchange medium, the improvement which comprises using eluent containing light-absorbing displacing ions which are or are made detectably light-absorbing in said effluent, photometrically monitoring said effluent using light which is detectably absorbed by said light -absorbing displacing ions and which photometrically distinguishes transient sample ions sufficiently to produce an effluent absorbance response proportional to the variable concentration of the monitored light absorbing displacing ions in the effluent, and indirectly determining the concentration of at least one of said chromatographically resolved ion species eluting off the ion exchange medium based on the fluctuation(s) caused by same in the effluent absorbance response as detected by the photometric monitoring step. 4. An ion exchange chromatographic method for the photometric determination of (non-light absorbing) transparent ions in a sample solution comprising the steps of passing a stream of an eluent solution containing photometrically measurable displacing ions through an ion exchange medium, introducing said sample solution into said stream ahead of the ion exchange medium, passing the combined streams of the eluent and sample solutions through said ion exchange medium effecting sequential displacement of the sample ions into the effluent of the ion exchange medium, wherein said.. displacing ions are or are made detectably light absorbing in said effluent, photometrically monitoring said effluent using light which is detectably absorbed by the displacing ions at a level substantially less than the sample ions, and indirectly determining the concentration of displaced sample ions of interest eluting of the ion exchange medium based on the decrements caused by said sample ions as detected in the effluent. 5. An improved liquid chromatographic method for the measurement of relatively transparent sample ions in solution using photometric detection, and which comprises differentially displacing by species sample ions from an ion-exchanger using an eluting ion which is or is made light absorbing at a given wavelength(s) or wavelength band, and wherein an eluted and resolved sample ion species of interest is relatively transparent versus the light-absorbing eluting ion under the monitored conditions, below, and determining the concentration of said relatively transparent eluted ion species by the decrement it causes in effluent absorbance as determined by photometrically monitoring the effluent of the ion-exchanger at said given wavelength(s) or wavelength band.

Inventors: MILLER, THEODORE EDWARD, JR., SMALL, HAMISH
Applicants: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1981
Main classification: G01N30
IPC codes: G01N21, G01N30