CONTAINERS

Abstract: A method of forming a smooth shoulder (16, 14b, 19b), neck (17, 37) and flange (18, 38) at the open end of the cylindrical side wall (12) of a can body (10) comprises the steps of forcing a marginal edge portion (13) of the side wall into at least a first die to form a first portion of reduced diameter having a first shoulder portion (14) and a first cylindrical portion (15); and optionally applying at least one rolling operation to the first portion of reduced diameter, and any further die formed portions of reduced diameter subsequently formed, to generate a smooth shoulder (16, 14, 19b), neck (17, 37) and flange (18, 38). Reference is made to the roll forming process described and claimed in British Patent 1,534,716 as being particularly suitable. The margin-portion (13) is preferably thicker than the rest of the side wall (12).

Description: -1- C0NTAINE5S TECHNICAL FIELD This invention relates to methods of reducing the diameter of a marginal portion of a cylindrical body to produce a shoulder and neck and more particularly but not exclusi v ely to a method of forming a can body having an outward directed flange on the neck. BACKGROUND ART Traditional methods of reducing the diameter of cylindrical bodies include "die necking" in which one end of the cylindrical body is forced into a conical die which exerts a co pressive force to reduce the diameter and "roll necking" in which a roll is engaged with the exterior of the cylindrical body as it is rotated to generate the shoulder profile by a spinning or beading process. United States Patent Specification 3,995,572 describes a method and apparatus for producing a seamless can body with -a reduced diameter opening for receiving an aerosol valve. Starting with a cylindrical workpiece a truncated conical portion supporting a cylindrical portion of reduced BAD ORIGINAL dia eter is formed by each of a sequence of dies to finally form a shoulder characterised by the curvilinear config¬ uration imposed by each die. The disadvantage of this series of "die necking" operations is that each die only brings about a relatively small reduction in can diameter so that the expense of several press tools is incurred. Furthermore, the shoulder produced has a corrugated or stepped shape which is not always desirable. Beverage cans are now well known in which the top of the side wall is necked in to receive an aluminium can end of diameter smaller than the outside diameter of the bulk of the can body. The objective in such cans is to use less aluminium can end material, thus the present invention also seeks to provide a method of making neck portions of reduced diameter. These prior art cans are usually 2.585" (65-6mm) diameter necked down to 2.462 (62.5BI∑0 diameter and made by one of several roll forming methods currently available. In one known roll forming method, as described in British Patent 1 330 ~~ & a peripheral edge margin of the sidewall of the can body is spun on a mandrel as an external roll compresses the margin > to generate a shoulder neck and flange. However, a collapsible mandrel is required to carry out this method. In another roll forming method, as described in our British Patent 1,53 , * 16, the can body is supported in axial compression while a marginal G1NA > portion adjacent the open end of the body is deformed radially inwards by a pair of external rollers so that the combination of axial and radial forces generate a shoulder, neck and flange. This method requires only a simple solid chuck, because the neck is formed into free space. DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION Accordingly this invention provides a method of forming at least one shoulder, a neck and a flange at an open end of the cylindrical side wall of a can body said method comprising the steps (1) successively forcing a marginal edge portion defining the open end of the side wall into one or more dies of reducing diameter to make a portion of reducing diameter consisting of a corresponding number of shoulder portions supporting a cylindrical portion; and (2) applying rolls in at least one rolling operation to at least part of the portion of reducing diameter and' cylindrical portion to further change the diameter of the cylindrical portion and generate at least one shoulder supporting the neck and flange. According to a preferred embodiment of the method a pair of rolls applies a radial force in combination with an axial force on the can in a method claimed according to any of claims 1 to 9 or claim 22 of British Patent 1,534,716. The method may be applied to can bodies of materials which tolerate severe cold work, the method comprising a simple die neck followed, by rolling being suitable when the can body is made of aluminium or alloys thereof. y- BAD ORIGINAL Vhen the can is made of metals which are less tolerant " of " cold work, extra die necking operations may be included in the method, for example when the body is made of tin- plate or stiff aluminium alloy. Although the die necking operations may not require a thickened side wall portion, a marginal edge portion thicker than the rest of the side wall may be used to avoid flange cracking arising from excessive work- * hardening. When the rolling method claimed in British Patent li53* ι 71 is used the diameter of the cylindrical portion to which the roll i§ applied is preferably less than that of the diameter of the final flange produced. The invention further provides a can body having a shoulder neck and flange when produced by the method described. BRIE? DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Various embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:- Fig.l is a side elevation of an aerosol can produced by a prior art die necking process; Fig.2 is a perspective sketch of a beverage can body broken away to show side wall thickness; Fig.3 is a perspective sketch of the can body of Fig 2 after forming of the shoulder, neck and flange; f * *o * * Λ S BAD ORIGIN - J Figs. a,b and c show diagra matically fragmentary sections of the side wall at various stages of the formation of a shoulder, neck and flange in a first embodiment of the method' Fig. a,b,c, & d show diagrammatically fragmentary sections of the side wall during a second em¬ bodiment of the method; Fig.6 is a sectioned elevation of part of a die necking tool; Fig. is a sectioned elevation of part of a roll forming apparatus before roll forming. Fig.8 is a like view to Fig.7 but showing the apparatus after roll forming of neck and flange; Fig.9 is a like view to Fig.7 showing apparatus for roll forming a component which has been die necked twice; and Fig.10 is a fragmentary section of the shoulder, neck and flange produced by the apparatus of Fig.9- Fig.11 a,b,c,d & e show diagrammatically fragmentary sections of the side wall during a third embodiment of the method; Fig.12 shows the roll position at the start of neck rolling in the method of Fig.11; and Fig.13 a,b,c,d,e and f shows diagrammatically the sequence of neck shapes produced by a fourth embodiment of the method. BAOORIGINAL -o- MODE OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION In Fig. 1 an aerosol can 1 drawn from sheet metal, has a shoulder characterised by a series of steps 2 each of which was made by a die necking operation. As depict¬ ed the reduced aperture of the top of the shoulder of ■ che aerosol can is*.closed by a valve cup 3. " * . * \ . ig. 2 shows a beverage can body 10 such as is produced from a sheet metal blank by drawing a cup which is then wall ironed to create a can having a bottom wall 11 substantially equal in thickness to the blank and side wall 12 thinner than the bottom wall 11. It is customary for such can bodies to be formed with a marginal portion 13 of thicker metal around the open end of the side wall. This marginal portion of metal thicker than the rest of the side wall is better able to tolerate flanging and subsequent fitting of a can end by double seaming. Had the can body of Fig.l been formed by deep drawing to a shallow height, the -side wall material would not necessarily be so work * hardened as to need the thicker marginal portion. Fig. 3 shows the can body of Fig.2 after the marginal portion 13 has been formed into a shoulder 14, neck 15 and flange 16 by a method including a sequence of die necking and rolling operations. Fig. 4 shows diagrammatically one embodiment of the method which includes the steps of taking a 2-585" BAD OBJG«N AL (65.6mm) diameter aluminium alloy can having a side wall ironed to 0.005" (0.127 mm) but provided with a thicker margin portion 13 about 0.008" (0.203 mm) thick. The axial length of the marginal portion is denoted "L" in Fig. 4(a) depends on the length of the final shoulder, neck and flange to be generated. This is because it is desirable to have a shoulder, neck and flange made from the thicker marginal material so that it can support the loads arising during the seaming on of a can end and thereafter when cans are stacked in transit. In this example the axial length "L" is about 0.55" (14 mm) to permit necking in from the 2.585" (65.6 mm) diameter to a final internal neck diameter of 2.360" (59.9mm). In Fig.4(b) the marginal portion 13 of Fig.4(a) has been forced into a die to form a first portion of re- . duced diameter having a first shoulder portion 14 which supports a first cylindrical portion 15 of internal dia¬ meter of approximately 2.463" (62.6mm). The die used for this operation is shown in Fig.6 and will be described later. In Fig. 4(c) the first portion of reduced diameter depicted in Fig.4(b) is depicted after roll forming by means of the apparatus of Figs.7 and 8, to further reduce the diameter of the first cylindrical portion 15 and gener¬ ate a smooth shoulder 16 supporting a neck 17 and flange 18. The internal diameter of the neck 17 is 2.360" (59.9=m). Whilst this method described with reference to Fig.4 BADORIGINAL is appropriate for metals such as aluminium and its alloys which are tolerant of cold work, metals such as steel and tinplate may require additional die reductions before roll forming to achieve equivalent total reduc¬ tions in can diameter. Fig.5 shows diagrammatically a sequence of opera¬ tions for the formation of a neck having an internal dia¬ meter of 2.260" (57.4mm) on a wall ironed tinplate can body of 2.585" (65.6mm) diameter. In Fig.5(a) like por¬ tions of the can body are denoted with the same symbols as used previously. The side wall 12 is of thickenss 0.004" (0.1mm), the marginal portion 13 has a thickness of 0.006" (0.15mm) and the axial length "L" of the marginal portion 13 is about 0.60" (15mm). In Fig.5(b) the marginal portion 13 of Fig.5-(a) has been forced into a die similar to that shown in Fig.6 to make a first portion of reduced dia¬ meter having a first shoulder portion 14(a) supporting a first cylindrical portion 15(a) of 2.510" (63.7mm) dia¬ meter. In Fig.5(c) the first portion of reduced diameter depicted in Fig.5(b) has been forced into a second die to further reduce the diameter of the first cylindrical por¬ tion 15(a) and form a second portion of further reduced diameter having a second shoulder portion 19 and second cylindrical portion 20 of 2.410" (61.2mm) diameter. Fig. 5(d) shows the smooth -shoulder 16, neck 17 and flange 18 generated by application of a roll to the first and second i Vf*f,-ι . . .. - BAPOR- GlNAL s portions of reduced diameter depicted in Fig.5(c). The method described with reference to Figure 5 ma be adapted to reduce the neck diameter of an aluminium can by use of the reductions tabulated in TABLE , in which the reductions for a tin plate can are shown to permit comparison:- "L" Starting First Die Second Die Rυllneck/ body Neck Neck flange Alumin¬ ium 0.495" 2.585"dia 2.480" 2.360" 2.260" (12.6mm) (65.6mm) (63mm) (59.9mm) (57.4mm) Tinplate 0.600" 2.585"dia 2.510" 2.410" 2.260" (15.2mm) (65-6n_m ) (63.8mm) (612mm) (57.4mm) Fig.6 shows a first die such .as is used to make the first portion of reduced diameter such as those shown in Figs.4(b) and 5(b). As the principles of such dies are understood in the art and apply to all the diameter re¬ ductions considered in this specification, the operation of only the one die will be described. In Fig.6 the apparatus comprises an external annular necking die in¬ sert 21 supported in an annular housing 22, and mandrel 23 movable in an axial direction relative to the die insert. The annular housing 22 has a frustoconical surface 24 which serves to lead the marginal portion 13 of a can body centrally to an inwardly centred surface 2 of the die insert. Th ' e surface 25 of the die insert continues BADORIGINA to a cylindrical surface 26. The mandrel comprises a cen¬ tring ring 27 having a cylindrical work surface 28 and a support ring 29 which supports the centring ring 27. The working surface 28 of the centring ring.27 and the cylin¬ drical surface 26 of the die insert are spaced apart a distance sufficient to permit the deformed marginal por¬ tion of a can to pass between until the leading edge of the can abuts the support ring so that the height of the die necked can is controlled as shown in Fig.6. In use, a can body is pushed into the apparatus so that the sur¬ face 24 guides the leading edge of the marginal portion 13 to the inwardly centred surface 25 of the die insert; the leading edge is deflected towards the working surface 28 of th'e centring ring 27 which in turn directs the lead¬ ing edge up. into the gap between the cylindrical working surface 28 of the mandrel and the cylindrical surface 26 of the die insert. Continued upward movement of the can body forms the first cylindrical portion of the neck un¬ til the leading edge abuts the support ring 29. The can is then ejected from the apparatus by moving the support ring 29 and centring ring 27 downwards to clear the die insert 21. Once the necked can has been ejected the apparatus is returned to the position depicted in Fig.6 in readiness for another can body. Figs. 7 and 8 show apparatus, for rolling a neck and flange into the side wall of a can body, as is described fully in British Patent 1,534,716 to which the reader is ϊ& directed for a full description. In simple terms the apparatus comprises a chuck 30 surrounded by a control ring 31, a lifter pad 3 movable towards and away from the chuck 30 and a pair of freely rotating work rolls 33 only one of which is shown. In Fig.7 a can body 10 is depicted just before the work rolls start work. The can body clamped between the control ring 31 and the lifter pad 32 is held central to an axis of rotation by the chuck 30. The whole assembly of chuck 30, control ring 31i can 10 and lifter pad 3 are rotated about the axis of rotation and the work rolls 33 are moved radially inwards, by a cam (not shown), to¬ wards the axis to bear upon the shoulder portion 14 and first cylindrical portion 15- The neck and flange are formed by regulating the downward axial motion of control ring 31 and lifter pad 32 relative to the work rolls 33 to generate the finished can shoulder 16, neck 17 and flange 18. It will be noticed that in Fig.8 the shoulder portion 16 and neck 17 are formed into free space, no collapsible mandrel ' having been used. Fig.9 shows how the same apparatus of Figs.7 and 8 is used to reform a die necked can having first and second portions of reduced diameter, as was described with refer¬ ence to Fig.5(c), into the finished can having a smooth*, shoulder 16, neck 17 and flange 18 of Fig.10. As shown in Fig.9 the work rolls such as that denoted 33 can be ''*? seen to first engage with the first reduced portion 14(a) as the can rotates. The shoulder, neck and flange are then generated as control ring and lifter pad move down¬ wards in relation to the chuck. As can best be under¬ stood from Fig.8, it will be seen that the peripheral edge of the flange 18 finally flips outwardly to be form¬ ed between an annular recess in the control ring 31 and the upper face of the work rolls 33- For this reason the external diameter (denoted Y in Fig.5(d))of the flange 18 will be greater than the internal diameter (denoted X in Fig.5(c))of the die necked component presented to the rolling apparatus. The third embodiment of the method as shown in Fig. 11 comprises taking a can body having a relatively thick rim as shewn in Fig.11(a), subjecting the rim to a se¬ quence of three successive die necking operations (Figs. 11(b), (c) and (d) and thereafter applying a roll to that portion of the neck produced by the third die necking op¬ eration to form the neck and flange of Fig. 11(e). The can body of Fig.11(a) was produced by drawing a cup 2.585".(65.6mm) diameter from a disc cut from a sheet of aluminium alloy 0.0140" (0.36mm) thick. The alloy of this example was aluminium with about l-J-% manganese, how¬ ever other alloys may be used. The side wall 12 of the drawn cup was wall ironed to a wall thickness of about .005" (0.13mm) leaving a marginal rim portion 13 some 0.0075" (0.19mm) thick and an axial length sufficient for BAD O IGINAL j the neck and flange. However, if desire some of the tapered portion may be formed into the neck. The first die necking operation reduces the diameter of the marginal rim from 2.585" (65.6mm) to a neck ' portion 15b about 2.462" (62.5mm) supported on a first shoulder 14b as shown in Fig.11(b). The second die necking opera¬ tion reduces the diameter of an. upper portion of the neck portion 15b of Fig.11(b) to a neck portion 20b about 2.360" (59.0.mm) supported on a second support 19b as shown in Fig. 11(c). The third die necking operation re¬ duces the diameter of an upper portion of the neck por¬ tion 20b of Fig. 11(c) to a third neck portion 35 of diameter of 2.260" (57.4mm) supported on a third shoulder portion 36. In contrast to the method of Fig.5 in which all the steps in the neck were rolled to create a smooth neck, in the method of Fig.11 only the outermost neck portion 35 and shoulder portion 3 are rolled to create a smooth neck 37 and flange 38. In Fig. 11 the minimum diameter of the neck portion 37 as produced by rolling, is 2.063" (52.4mm). The apparatus shown in Fig.12 works in the same way as the apparatus described with reference to Fig. 7,8 and 9. The chuck 30 is entered into the can body to support the neck portion 35 while the rolls, such as that denoted 33. roll the third shoulder portion 36 and neck portion 35 into the neck 37 and flange 38 shown in Fig.11(e). Fig.13 shows diagrammatically a fourth embodiment of BAPORIGINAL the method which may be applied to tinplate or aluminium bodies. In this embodiment a tinplate body is subjected to two die necking operations shown in Figs. 13(b) and 13(c) followed by three rolling operations shown as Figs. 13(d), 13(e) and 13(f). In Fig. 13(a) the can body has a cylindrical side- wall 12, of diameter 2.585" (65.6mm) defining the mouth of the can. The first and second die necking operations, the products of which are depicted in Figs. 13(b) and 13(c), reduce the diameter of the mouth to a diameter of 2.510" (63.8mm) and 2.410" (61.2mm) respectively, sub¬ stantially in the manner described with reference to Fig.5. A rolling operation, as already described with ref¬ erence to Fig.5 was used to produce the flanged body of Fig.13(d) having an internal neck diameter of 2.210" (56.1mm) so producing a flange 39 of diameter smaller than that depicted in Fig. 5- The flange is removed by further rolling to produce the can body of Fig.13(e), the mouth of which is defined by a cylindrical neck portion. 40 of 2.245" (57mm) diameter. This further rolling causes the slight increase in internal neck diameter. Further rolling of the neck portion 40 of the can body of Fig. 13(e) generates a smooth neck of minimum diameter 2.063" (52-4mm) terminating in an outwardly directed flange 41 (Fig. 13(f) suitable for double seam¬ * • *- ing to a can end of the 202 size in conventional can mak- ' ~ ' ■ BADORIGINA ing nomenclature. From comparison of the embodiments of the method of the invention, it will be understood that the method may comprise various combinations of die necking and rolling operations to form a shoulder, neck and flange of reduced diameter on a can body. BAD ORIGINAL

Claims: AMENDED CLAIMS (received by the International Bureau on 20 January 1981 ( 20.01.81 ) ) 1. A method of forming a shoulder, neck and flange at an open end of the cylindrical side wall of a can body, characterized by a die necking operation followed by a rolling operation, wherein the die necking operation includes a die necking step in which a marginal edge portion defining the open end of the side wall is forced into a die to make a portion of reduced diameter having a shoulder portion supporting a cylindrical portion, and wherein the rolling operation includes a rolling step in which the portion of reduced diameter is rolled so as to further reduce the diameter of the cylindrical portion and generate a smooth shoulder supporting a neck and a flange. 2. A method according to Claim 1 characterized in that the die necking operation includes a plurality of said die necking steps performed in succession each in a separate die and each producing a respective one said portion of reduced diameter, and the rolling operation includes at least one rolling step in which at least the portion of reduced diameter made in the last die necking step is by rolling reduced to generate a smooth shoulder supporting a neck and a flange. CMFI 3- A method according to Claim 1 or 2, comprising supporting the can body in axial compression whilst deforming the can body adjacent to said open end by applying an axial shortening force thereto simultaneously with an inward radial force. 4. A method according to Claim 3, wherein said can body is supported endwise between a can bottom support element and an axial thrust member, with a terminal edge of said body, defining said open end, engaging said thrust member, relative axial movement being effected between said support element and thrust member to maintain said endwise support as the can body is shortened during application of said radial force. ι 5. A method according to Claim 3 or Claim 4, wherein a pilot element is disposed with a first circum erential tool edge thereof coaxially within said body, said radial force being applied by a second tool edge spaced from said first tool edge by a distance having a constant axial component, said first edge acting as a fulcrum for the deformation of the can body. 6. A method according to Claim 5, wherein the second tool edge is moved radially with respect to the can body. 7. A method according to Claim 5 or Claim 6, wherein the can body, supported in axial compression, is subjected to relative axial movement between itself and said tool edges, whereby the neck and flange are formed progressively towards said terminal edge. 8. A method according to Claim 1 or 2, comprising the steps of: supporting said can body axially between a can bottom support element and an axial thrust member, with a terminal edge of said body at its open end engaging said thrust member, and with a pilot element, having a first circumferential tool edge, disposed with said first tool edge coaxially within the can body; and effecting relative axial movement between, on the one hand, the can body, support element and thrust member, and, on the other hand, said pilot element and a forming element having a second tool edge engaging said can body, whilst effecting relative radial movement between the can body and said second edge and relative axial movement between said support element and thrust member, so as to continue to support the can body whilst shortening it, whereby at least part of said flange and neck is formed in the can body by said second edge with said first edge acting as a fulcrum, said first and second edges being maintained in respective planes at a constant axial spacing from each other. 9. A method according to Claim 8, wherein said forming element is a roller, said second edge being formed circumferentially thereof, and the roller being rotated about it own axis during formation of the neck and flange. OMPI 10. A method according to Claim 8 or Claim 9, wherein the can body is rotated about its own axis by simultaneous rotation of said support element and thrust member. 11. A method according to any one of Claims 8 to 10, wherein the said tool edges are maintained in fixed axial planes whilst the can body, support member and thrust member are moved axially with respect thereto. 12. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterized in that the can body is made of tinplate or aluminium or aluminium alloy. 13- A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterized in that the marginal edge portion is thicker than the rest of the side wall of the can body. 14- A method according to any one of Claims 3 to 11 characterized in that the diameter of the cylindrical portion to which the rolls are applied is less than that of the diameter of the final flange produced. 15- (UK claims only) A method of forming at least one shoulder, a neck and a flange on a cylindrical side wall of a can body substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Figures 2,3,4,7 and 8 of the accompanying drawings. 16. (UK claims only) A method of forming at least one shoulder, a neck and a flange on a cylindrical side wall of a can body substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Figures 2,3,5,9 and 10 of the accompanying drawings. 17- (UK claims only) A method of forming at least one shoulder, a neck and a flange on. a cylindrical side wall of a can body substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Figures 11 and 12 of the accompan^ring drawings. 18. (UK claims only) A method of forming at least one shoulder, a neck and a flange on a cylindrical side wall of a can body substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Figure 13 of the accompanying drawings. 19- A can body having at least one shoulder, a neck and a flange characterized in that it is produced by the method of any preceding claim. STATEMENTUNDERARTICLE 19 By way of amendment of this application under Rule **l6, please, cancel the existing pages 16 to 18 and substitute the new pages 16 to 20 enclosed herewith. The differences between .the replaced pages 16 to 18 and the corresponding new pages are as follows. Claims 1 - 8 are cancelled and their subject matter is condensed in the new Claims 1 and 2. Claim 1 is now in close agreement with Claim 1 of the convention document, and in addition makes explicit the sequence of the die necking operation and rolling operation. Claim 3 is cancelled and the text of Claims 1 to 9 of British Patent 1 53--J 716, referred to in the cancelled claim, is now contained, -with necessary minor modifications, in the new Claims 3 to 11. New Claims 12 - 19 correspond substantially to the originally filed Claims 11 to 19-

Inventors: ABBOTT J, BERRY C, KOHN E, SLADE M
Applicants: ABBOTT J, BERRY C, KOHN E, METAL BOX CO LTD, SLADE M, METAL BOX LTD
Application year: 1981
Main classification: B21D51
IPC codes: B21D41, B21D51