A KEYBOARD

Abstract: Keyboard (20) having a plurality of keys (12, 14, 16) thereon at least one of which is designated as a critical function key (16), wherein each key is movable from a home position along an actuation path to its operated position and has means (24) for restoring it towards its home position. In prior art keyboards of this kind important data may be lost by accidental actuation of a critical function key, e.g. a "Delete" key. The present invention overcomes this problem by providing a keyboard in which a critical function key (16) has a warning member (40, 60) associated therewith which causes the force required to move the key to its operated position to be significantly greater than that required to move each of the other keys not having a warning member associated therewith. The increase in force provides tactile feedback to an operator of the keyboard before the critical function key's operated position is reached to thereby warn said operator that he is about to operate the key (16). In one embodiment, the warning member (40, 60) is made of resilient material, has a generally washer-like shape, and is positioned around the key stem (18) and under the key cap (26) of the critical function key (16).

Description: A KEYBOARD Technical Field This invention relates to a keyboard, and more specifically, it relates to a means for helping a key- board operator to avoid accidental operation of a critical function key such as a "Break" or a "Delete" key on the keyboard. Background Art Very often, a critical function key such as "Delete" (which may, for example, eliminate all accumu¬ lated data resulting from a series of transactions) is located next to an "Enter" key on the keyboard. It becomes apparent that during the training of an operator using the keyboard, and thereafter, even with an exper- ienced operator, important data may be lost because the operator accidentally operates a critical function such as "Delete" instead of an intended, adjacent "Enter" key. The data which is lost thereby must be re-developed with consequent increases in costs of preparation of the data and a loss of time. Disclosure of the Invention It is an object of the invention to provide a keyboard by means of which the risk of accidental operation of a critical function key can be reduced. Thus, according to the invention, there is provided a keyboard having a plurality of keys thereon, wherein each key is manually movable from a home posi¬ tion to an operated position against a restoring force tending to restore the key to its home position, characterized in that at least one key has associated therewith warning means which serves to cause the force required to move the key to its operated position to be significantly greater than that required to move each of the keys other than said at least one key to its OMPI operated position, said at least one key providing, when actuated, tactile feedback to an operator of the key¬ board before the key's operated position is reached to thereby warn the operator that he is about to operate the key. An advantage of the keyboard according to the invention is that the tactile feedback mentioned occurs before an incorrect entry is made because the operated position of the associated key being depressed cannot be reached without applying an actuating force notice¬ ably greater than that normally applied. Another advantage is that the operator's attention is directed spatially to an area of the key¬ board when a critical function key is about to be oper- ated. This facilitates the spatial discrimination of a critical function key from the surrounding keys, and it also promotes rapid learning. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the warning means is so arranged that the force required to operate the associated key increases progressively as the key is being moved towards its operated position, whereas the force required to oper¬ ate each of the keys not having warning means associated therewith remains substantially constant as the key is moved towards its operated position. An advantage of this embodiment is that the progressively increasing resistance to actuation of the or each key having warning means associated therewith provides the key with a distinct "feel" as compared to each of the other keys. When metal springs alone, for example, are used as the means for restoring all the keys on a keyboard to a home position, the force neces¬ sary to depress a key is substantially constant along the actuation path of the key. In another preferred embodiment in which the warning means is a resilient member positioned around the stem and under the cap of a key, this resilient ember may be removed from the associated key and re- positioned around the stem of a different key so as to form a warning means for said different key. The advantage of this just mentioned e bodi- ment is with programmable keyboards in which any one of the keys thereon may attain a new significance of func¬ tion as a result of re-writing associated software pro¬ grams. This means that a particular critical function key could appear anywhere on an existing keyboard. The just mentioned embodiment facilitates modifying any particular key to distinguish it as a critical function key. The modifying can be accomplished easily by a customer. Brief Description of the Drawings Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: * Fig. 1 is a general, perspective view of a portion of a keyboard having a plurality of keys thereon and in which this invention may be used; Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view, taken along the line A-A of Fig. 1, showing a typical prior-art arrangement of a key within a keyboard; Fig. 3 is a cross-sectional view, taken along the line A-A of Fig. 1, showing a first embodiment of this invention; Fig. 4 is an enlarged, side view, in elevation, of a conventional key switch module shown being mounted on a circuit board; Fig. 5 is a view, similar to Fig. 4, showing another embodiment of the resilient member of this invention as it is mounted on a key switch module; Fig. 6 is a general, perspective view of the resilient member shown in Fig. 5; Fig. 7 is a general, perspective view of another embodiment of the resilient member; Fig. 8 is a Force-Distance diagram for a metal spring; and Fig. 9 is a Force-Distance diagram of the resilient member when it is made of a foam rubber. Best Mode of Carrying Out the Invention Fig. 1 is a general perspective view of a keyboard, designated generally as 10, in which this invention may be used. The keyboard 10 includes a plurality of keys 12 which may be considered general data keys and it also includes, for example, an Entry key 14 and a Delete key 16 which are shown next to each other for purposes of illustration. As earlier stated herein, when an Entry key 14 is placed near a Delete key 16, valuable data may be lost when the Delete key 16 is accidentally actuated instead of the intended Entry key 14. .Fig..2 shows a cross section of the Delete key 16 shown in Fig. 1. The key 16 in Fig. 2 is shown as prior art, and in a prior-art keyboard, all the keys like 12, 14, and 16 would be constructed in the same manner so that all the keys on the associated keyboard would require the same force to.operate a key. Fig. 2 is, to some- degree, a diagrammatic representation of an individual key 16; it was drawn this way so as to facilitate a general description of the various elements and functions associated with a key in a keyboard. Some modular key units, more typical of the state-of-the-art key switches, will be discussed later herein. The key 16 (Fig. 2) includes a key stem 18 which is inserted through a matching hole in a top mounting plate 20 of the keyboard 10. The stem 18 has an enlarged portion 22 which abuts against the underside of the plate 20 (as viewed in Fig. 2) to limit the upward motion of the stem 18. The means for restoring the key 16 to the home position shown is represented by MPI a compression spring 24 which is positioned between the top of the plate 20 and the underside of a removeable key cap 26 which is detachably secured to the stem 18. The key 16 also includes its associated contacts which are represented by a stationary contact 28 which rests on a stationary insulating plate 30 and a moveable contact 32. The contacts 28 and 32 are connected to an electrical circuit 34. The lower side of the enlarged portion 22 of the key stem 18 has a small compression spring 36 depending therefrom to engage the moveable contact 32. It will be understood that_ the present inven¬ tion could also be employed in a mechanical keyboard, and that the showing in an electrical circuit environment is therefore only illustrative. The operation of the key 1.6 shown in Fig. 2 is as follows. When an operator depresses the key cap 26, the key stem 18 moves along the actuation path 38 towards • the plate 30 against the bias of spring 24. As the stem 18 is so moved, the small compression spring 36 resil- iently forces the moveable contact 32 into engagement with the stationary contact 28 to produce the "makepoint" or to effect the completion of an electrical circuit. The spring 36 provides for the "aftertravel" of the stem 18 along the actuation path 38 after the makepoint is reached and also helps to control the compressive forces exerted on the contacts 28 and 32 so as to minimize damage to them. The sizes of the springs 24 and 36 and other components of the key 16 are conventionally selec- ted to provide the particular predetermined force to operate the key 16 and to provide the particular length of the actuation path 38 and the particular location of the makepoint along the path 38. Fig. 3 represents one embodiment of this invention which shows a resilient member 40 being posi¬ tioned between the key cap 26 and the plate 20 for a critical function key 42. The key 42 is identical to the key 16 shown in Fig. 2 except for the addition of the resilient member 40; accordingly, similar elements shown in Fig. 3 are given the identical reference numer¬ als used in Fig. 2. The resilient member 40 (Fig. 3). provides an increase in force above the force (supplied by springs 24 and 36} required to operate the regular keys like 12 in Fig. 1. The normal force required to operate a key may be, for example, from about 50 to 100 grams. The increase in force due to the addition of the resilient member should be about 200 grams above the normal force required to actuate a key in the example given. This increase in force provides the tactile feedback to an operator of the keyboard before the associated makepoint of the key 42 is reached to thereby warn the operator that he is about to operate a critical function key 42 as earlier described. The overall shape of the resilient member 40 (Fig. 3) is .sleeve-like or cylindri.cal (in the form of a thick washer) although it could be made square, for example, to match the general shape of the keys like 12 and 14 shown in Fig. 1. The cross section of the resil¬ ient member 40 is shown in Fig. 3. The member 40 has a reduced wall thickness as shown at area 44 to avoid having that area 44 being abraded by the spring 24 when the member 40 is compressed during actuation of the key 42. The resilient member 40 is made of a resilient material such as foam rubber and the inner surface of the member 40 facing the spring 24 could be manufactured with a smooth surface to prevent the member from being abraded by the spring 24 which might tend to reduce the operating life of the resilient member 40. Fig. 4 shows a side, elevational view of a conventional key switch module 46 alluded to earlier herein. The module 46 generally includes a cube-type body 48 with the key cap 50 and key stem 52 extending therefrom as shown. The module 46 is mounted on a support member or a circuit board 54 with the switch lugs 56 and 58 extending therefrom for connection to certain elements on the board 54 or to external circuitry as previously described. The key switch module 46 may be of the type which has mechanical contacts therein or may be of the capacitive coupling type, as is typically done. The module 46 also has a restoring means (not shown) within the body to return the key cap 50 to the home position shown in Fig. 4. Because the switch module 46 is conventional, it need not be described in further detail except to state that a plurality of modules such as module 46 are arranged on and mounted on the circuit board 54 to form an arrangement of keys as is shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 5 is a view similar to Fig. 4 showing another embodiment of the resilient member 60 which is positioned on a key switch module 62. The member 60 is • shown in cross section in Fig. 5 with the cross- sectional line taken along a line similar to line A-A shown in Fig. 1. A perspective view of the membe 60 is shown in Fig. 6. The module 62 is identical to the module 46 shown in Fig. 4 except for the addition of the resilient member 60; accordingly, the same reference numerals are used in Figs. 4 and 5 to represent identical parts. The actuation path for the key stem 52 is shown by reference numeral 64 in Fig. 5. As previously explained, when the resilient member 60 (Fig. 5) is positioned on a critical function key switch module 62, the increase in force apparent when a keyboard operator attempts to operate the module 62 provides the tactile feedback to the operator before the module's associated makepoint is reached. This warns the operator that he is about to operate a cri¬ tical function key. Usually, the key cap 50 (Fig. 5) is detachably removeable from the associated key switch module 62 to permit the resilient member 60 to be inserted around the key stem 52; however, if the key cap 50 is not removable, the resilient member 66 shown in Fig. 7 may be used. The resilient member 66 is identical to member 60 except for the fact that it has a cut 68 extending through the member 66 (similar to a "C" washer) to permit it to be expanded and to be inserted around a key stem without having to remove the associated key cap. The member 66 is especially useful for altering existing keyboards in customer's use for those keyboards which do not have removeable key caps. Fig. 8 is a Force-Distance diagram 72 of a metal spring such as spring 24 shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 9 is a Force-Distance diagram 74 of a resilient member such as 60 when it is made of a resilient material such as foam rubber. Notice that the force (Fig. 8) necessary to compress the spring 24 is substantially constant over a considerable distance in- the actuation path prior to increasing. The Force-Distance diagram 74 for the resilient member 60 indicates that the force required to compress the member 60 increases progressively as the member 60 is compressed. This action provides a very distinct, tactile feedback to enable an operator to sense that a critical function key is about to be oper¬ ated. The key action when using a resilient member such as 60 is considerably damped. A suitable foam rubber for use in the resilient members 40, 60, and 66, for example,-may be one that satisfies the American Society for Testing Materials procedure ASTM-DI564. With this procedure, a 25 milli- meter thick section of foam rubber having an area of 322.5 square centimeters will be compressed to a thickness of 15 millimeters (representing a 25% com¬ pression) when subjected to a force of 70.3 grans per square centimeter.

Claims: CLAIMS : 1. A keyboard having a plurality of keys thereon, wherein each key is manually movable from a home position to an operated position against a restoring force tending to restore the key to its home position, characterized in that at least one key (16) has asso¬ ciated therewith warning means (40) which serves to cause the force required to move the key (16) to its operated position to be significantly greater than that required to move each of the keys (12) other than said at least one key to its operated position, said at least one key (16) providing, when actuated, tactile feedback to an operator of the keyboard before the key's operated position is reached to thereby warn the operator that he is about to operate the key (16). 2. A.keyboard according to claim 1, .charac¬ terized in t'hat said warning means (4*0) is so arranged that the force required to operate the associated key (16) increases progressively as the key (16) is being moved ' towards its operated position, whereas the force required to operate each of the keys (12) other than said at least one key remains substantially constant as the key (12) is moved towards its operated position. 3. A keyboard according to either claim 1 or 2, characterized in that said warning means comprises a resilient member (40, 60, 66). 4. A keyboard according to claim 3, charac¬ terized in that each key (12, 16) has a key cap (26) and a key stem (18), said resilient member (40) being positioned around the key stem (18) and under the key cap (26) of the associated key (16). 5. A keyboard according to claim 4, charac¬ terized in that each key (12, 16) is associated with a n 5 . ( concluded ) compression spring (24) which serves to restore the key (12, 16) to its home position, said resilient member (40) being positioned around the associated compression spring (24). 6. A keyboard according to claim 5, charac¬ terized in that said resilient member (40) has a reduced wall thickness along a portion thereof to minimize the abrasion of said resilient member (.40) by the associated compression spring (24) during operation of the asso¬ ciated key (16) . 7. A keyboard according to claim 3, charac¬ terized in that said resilient member (40, 60, 66) is made of foam rubber. 8. A keyboard according to- any one of claims 4 to '7, * characterized in that said resilient member (40, 60, 66) is removable mounted around the stem (18) of the associated key (16) in such a manner that said resilient member (40, 60, 66) may be removed from the associated key (16) and repositioned around the stem of a different key so as to form a warning means for said different key. 9. A keyboard according to claim 8, charac¬ terized in that said resilient member (66) is divided on one side thereof to enable the insertion of said resili¬ ent member (66) under, and its removal from under, a key cap (26) without removing the key cap (26). 10. A keyboard according to claim 1, charac¬ terized in that each key is included in a respective modular unit (62) having a body (48), a key stem (52) having one end extending from said body (48), and a key cap (50) secured to said one end, each modular unit (62) being mounted on a support member (54) to form said key¬ board. CMPI

Inventors: CORDES RICHARD E, SEARS RONALD J
Applicants: NCR CO, NCR CORP
Application year: 1981
Main classification: B41J5
IPC codes: B41J5, H01H13