PAPER MAKING PROCESS UTILIZING AN AMPHOTERIC MUCOUS STRUCTURE AS BINDER

Abstract: Paper making process with improved retention and binding of fillers and second grade fibers. It is characterized by the use of an amphoteric mucous like compound as binder. This compound is the reaction product between cationic starch of low charge density and an anionic polymer of high charge density as carboxymethyl cellulose. The compound has amphoteric and mucous characters and should be used for paper making, while in a unique transient structure. This structure is characterized by filler particles being enclosed and finely distributed in droplets of the highly hydrated but substantially water-insoluble mucous compound. According to the invention this transient structure may further be reorganized to a less hydrated and more resistant gel structure, still enclosing the filler. This gel structure can stand the draining forces on a paper machine wire. This structural reorganization is achieved by reaction with colloidal inorganic polymers of very high surface charge as polysilicic acid and polyaluminium compounds. The process yields papers of high strengths and filler retentions of more than 90% at a single fire passage even at extreme filler contents of 30-60% of the paper weight.

Description: PAPER MAKING PROCESS UTILIZING AN AMPHOTERIC MUCOUS STRUCTURE AS BINDER The invention refers to a paper making process, and is based on the use of a new amphoteric compound as binder for fillers and second grade fibers. This compound is obtained by reaction of cationic starch of low charge density with linear polyanionic polymers of high charge density as carboxymethyl cellulose and polyacrylic acid. By this reaction a complex organized structure is formed, which chemically is related to certain biologi¬ cal mucus polysaccharide structures. lt is able to reorganize itself to efficient and mechanically strong envelope structures around filler particles and ibers, whereby . it enables improved binding thereof in the final paper structure. The invention is further based on the use of inorganic polymer colloids of strongly ionic character for final reorganization of the "mucus envelope" to a mechanically strong structure that can withstand the heavy draining forces on the paper machine wire. The process can be utilized in regular paper making and yields very high retention and very high paper strengths at extreme high filler contents of 30-60% of the paper weight. Cationic starches have been used since long in the paper industry, but in small percentages of 0,2-1,0% on paper weight. According to the present invention, the amount of cationic starch used for paper making can be increased to between 3 and 10% without any process troubles. Star¬ ches containing both cationic and anionic groups have earlier been proposed as binders in paper, and so have mixtures of cationic and anionic starches. The proposed systems refer, however, to anionic starches of low charge density or DS (degree of substitution) of 0,01-0,10 which is of the same - 3 ~ E ηj~ OMPI order as DS of commercial cationic starches 0,015-0,050. According to our investigations, such starches and starch combinations will give a much inferior result compared with the present invention, and they can not give the organized structure of a mucous filler-envelope, which is characteristic for this invention. The DS (degree of substitution) of trade mark cationic starches (CS) are very low, mostly 0,015 to 0,050, which means that 1,5 resp. 5% of the glucose units are substituted with amino groups, mostly quarternary amino groups. We have obtained the best results with cationic starches (CS) of highest possible molecular weight (100.000-500.000) and a DS of 0,025- 0,050 preferably 0,030-0,035, corresponding to EW (equivalent weight) of about 6.000. Trade mark carboxymethyl celluloses (CMC) are also available in various MW and DS. Their. DS is mostly very high and may vary between 0,40 and 0,90, and we have found the higher DS of 0,60-0,90, preferably 0,70-0,80 best suited for the invention, which corresponds to an EW of around 300. A DS below 0,10 is here called "low" (low charge density) and above 0,50 "high". Further a medium MW of 50.000-300.000, correspon¬ ding to a Brookfield viscosity of 20-300 cps in 2% solutions are to be prefe- red, even if CMC grades outside these limits also can be used. If one prepares a mixture of CS (EW 6.000) and CMC (EW 300) in a 2-3% water solution and in equivalent amounts, that is 5 parts of CMC per 100 parts of CS, one gets a somewhat turbid low viscosity solution. On standing a precipitate of CS-CMC slowly separates. Such a product can be used for the invention, but it is not the most efficient product that can be obtained. For the most efficient product only about half the amount of CMC or 2-3 parts per 100 CS has to be used, and this CMC should prefe¬ rably be predissolved cold in the water in which the CS has to be swollen and "dissolved". The technically recommended process for dissolving CS by direct steam injection during prolonged time in order to get a "molecular solution free of structural agglomerates" should in fact be avoided. As OMPI said, the most efficient structure of the CS-CMC reaction product is obtai¬ ned when the reaction product is formed already during swelling and solubi- lization of the starch grains. Technically it is of advantage to utilize a dry mixture of CS with 2-3 parts of CMC as Na-salt. When mixed with cold water the CMC component then dissolves without formation of CMC- lumps, which otherwise causes difficulties. The CS starts to swell at 50-60°C under formation of a specific structure with CMC. Cooking of the formed structure at 90-100° should be prolonged for 10 minutes, but contrary to pure CS it does not change character during prolonged cooking. The resulting solution is somewhat turbid and of much lower viscosity than only CS at the same concentration. The solution can be made in a concentration of 2-6% CS. The optimal ratio of CS to CMC or any other anionic polymer is not related to any equivalency point or to any fixed relation between anionic and cationic ratio. Of importance is the organization of anionic and cationic areas inside the mucous structure obtained. This optimal ratio must be settled by tests for evry CS - anionic polymer combination. For the natural alginic acid with DS=1,0 the optimal ratio is the same as for CMC with DS=0,7 or 2-3 parts per 100 parts of CS. For polyacrylic acid also with DS=1,0 (but with smaller units than glucose) the optimal weight ratio is around 1,5 parts per 100 parts of CS. With too low polyacid content (below CMC/CS=0,5/100) the final mucous structure including filler is too weak mechanically and inadequate to final binding the pigment in the paper. With too high polyacid content the structure will resist combination with fillers. Plyacid/CS ratios above 10/100 are hardly useful, while practical limits are 1-8/100 CS. As already indicated, alginic acid from sea-weed and polyacrylic acid can be used as reactants with CS, but CMC seems at present to be the most economic reactant. Also a low molecular polyacid like citric acid has a minor but inadequate effect, when used according to the invention. It can be used in polyacid combinations. Of special interest are oligomer silicic acids, which also react with CS to mucus-like compounds of amphote¬ ric character. If commercial waterglass of ratio SiO_/Na 3 0=3,3/l is added to the water in which CS is going to be dissolved in an optimal amount of 2-6% SiO- on weight of CS, first white voluminous starch-silicic-acid- precipitates are formed when CS starts to swell. After cooking a mucous dispersion is obtained, similar to that with CMC, but of higher viscosity. Commercial waterglass corresponds to di-sodium-salts of linear tri- and tetra-siiicic acid, but it is supposed that these acids polymerize further and linearly during reaction with CS. If di-sodium salt of penta-siiicic acid is used as reactant with CS a much more rigid gel structure of high and complex viscosity is obtained. For preparation of the mucous structure at this stage of the process, hence, silicic acid oiigomers with maximum 4 SiO- should be used. Three dimensional polymers of above 4 SiO- should be used for the final reorganization or curing of the mucus structure to a resistant gel structure. A suitable way of utilizing the cheap waterglass for the invention is to divide the addition in two steps or to combine it with small amounts of CMC. CS is then swollen and dissolved together with 1-2 parts of CMC or SiO- and at a lower temperature a diluted waterglass is added in an amount corresponding to 1-4% SiO- on CS. This latter addition can be made together with the addition of filler-suspension or even after it. The chemical structure obtained by reacting 2 parts CMC (DS 0,7 and MW 150.000) with 100 parts CS (DS 0,03 and MW 300.000) should likely be "a ionic bond coacervate" of one central CMC-unit surrounded by 20-30 cationic starch units. Such a structure should give a high viscosity. But the viscosity of the structure formed is rather low, which indicates that the coacervates are collected in larger, denser and more rigid structures, proba¬ bly the original but swollen grains of the CS with some enrichment of CMC on their surface. A swollen starch grain (potato starch) has a size of around 100 micron. The primary structure obtained by dissolving CS in a CMC-solution have some further interesting properties. 1. Contrary to pure CS, the structure shows a stable viscosity during pro¬ longed cooking and this viscosity is surprisingly low already after completed swelling. The external water phase contains no dissolved starch when separated and analyzed. The resulting product is, consequen¬ tly, not a real solution but a suspension of a substantially insoluble mucus compound, a coacervate of anionic-cationic polyelectrolytes. 2. The external water and the internal mucus structure mostly show a difference of pH that can be maintained during several days until the structure looses viscosity and collapses. This difference has its origin in the fact that CMC, or any other polyacid used, is added as a slightly alkaline salt (pH 7-9) while CS mostly is neutral (pH 6- 7), but it is surprising that the primary structure formed has a "membra¬ ne-effect" that can be kept for so long time. When a pH-paper strip is dipped in the CS-CMC-solution it shows the external pH of 8-9. When the strip with adhered mucus structure is squeezed or rubbed between fingers, the pH decreases to 7 in connection with collapse of the structu¬ re. Thus, the structure is transient-instable. 3. When the reaction product of CS and CMC (or any other polyacid) is brought in contact with a slurry of filler (as kaolin or chalk) the mucous structure is reorganized while it combines with the filler particles. The reorganization yields a new secondary structure of filler particles finely enclosed by an envelope of mucus in small spherical droplets. This reorganization is accompanied by a strong increase of viscosity and an equalization of the pH gradient described above. The droplets of mucus enclosing the filler (the secondary structure) easily agglo¬ merate and separate from the external water, which still contains no substantial amounts of dissolved CS or CMC. The mixing of the primary mucus composition with filler slurry can be performed cold or with a still hot CS-CMC product. pH is not important and may vary between 5 and 9, depending on filler (kaolin-acidic and chalk- -alkaline). A suitable ratio of CS-CMC to filler is 10% but the amount of CS-CMC-binder can vary between 2 and 20% of the weight of filler. An economical optimum is between 5 and 15%. If no filler or only small amounts of filler is to be used, an addition of 1-8% of CS-CMC on weight of dry furnish is useful for compensating the lack of strength, accompanying second grade fibers. The concentration of the filler suspension may vary between 10 and 30%, and the concentration of the CS-CMC compound may vary between 2 and 4%. Higher concentrations may give lumps of filler with inadequate contact with the CS-CMC-binder. Such lumps will give a "dotty" and dusty paper with low surface strength. Lower concentra- tions may be used, but result in lower strengths of the final paper. Thus, if the secondary mucus structure is formed in high dilution, also the secondary mucus structure will be "diluted" and weakened. The secondary structure is likely composed of filler particles finely enclosed in droplets of CS-CMC- mucus. The building blocks of this mucus should be coacervates of one anionic CMC-unit (or the polyacid used) in a central position, surrounded by 20-30 cationic CS-moIecuies, kept together by ionic forces between CS and CMC, and extensively hydrated. The peripheral CS branches of this agglome¬ rate will bind by ionic bonds to the slightly anionic filler particles and cover them by an envelope. The filler particles have a size of 1-10 microns, while the mucous unit block should be less than one micron but linked together with other blocks by other CMC-units to a giant mucus molecule extending over whole the droplet. A surprising property of this secondary structure is that the droplets can agglomerate to large dough lumps in a reversible way, allowing separation by filtering and even an extensive drying before redespersion to a useful paper furnish with good formation properties. Simple ionic bonds in polyeloctrolytes are not strong nor stable. In biological mucopolysaccharides, stability is obtained by a DS=1 of glucose- amines and-acids, often reinforced by protein-crosslinking. The secondary structure is accordingly not stable. It slowly reorganizes to less viscouse structures and finally fades away while the filler particles are redispersed to the external water phase. The secondary structure is also transient and must be used before 24 to 48 hours after preparation. Especially chalk loaded structures are sensitive to aging, probably depending on a slow forma¬ tion of Ca-ions, which react with CMC and thereby weakens the CS-CMC- bonds. Also the primary CS-CMC mucus without filler is transient. It has the highest absorption power for fillers when newly prepared, but it is still useful after 24-48 hours. The role of CMC (or any other polyacid) can be expressed as follows. A cationic- anionic starch mixture will not give these features unless the anionic part has a high DS and is decomposed to short linear molecules. 1. It binds CS to giant, hydrated but substantially insoluble mucus coa¬ cervates. ^ -rtrs-r- 2. It contributes to a high ionic and surface activity of these coacervates, whereby they are able to enclose the filler ef iciently and in a highly ' dispersed form. 3. It contributes to improved mechanical resistancy of the mucus structure, also when this has been reorganized to a gel in the following step of the process. 4. It finally contributes to a much more efficient binding of the filler in the final paper than any starch combination can do. The secondary structure of encapsulated fillers in droplets of C5-CMC- mucus may seem stable at a laboratory test, but in most cases it is not enough strong mechanically to withstand the intensive forces of draining at the wire of a fast running paper machine. Anyhow it will not be strong enough to give the desired filler retention of 90-95% at one single passage over the wire. It is therefore of advantage to reorganize or "cure" the secondary mucu s structure to a tertiary more resistant gel structure. This can be done by a synerese reaction (dehydration) achieved by addition of small amounts of colloidal mainly inorganic polymers with very high surface charge. Such inorganic polymers of anionic character are poly- silicic acids with 5-50 Si0--units per molecule, while certain polyaluminium componds are examples of suitable cationic polymers. Finally complex polyaluminium-citrate-sulfate compounds, corresponding to a formula AlΛOH Ci- +* SO ft ~ (Ci= a citric acid equivalent), seem to be amphoteric polymers with both anionic and cationic surface charges, which are very efficient. Common alum can be used in certain cases, when the furnish pH is above 7 and the Al-polymerization hence very fast. The first reorganization of the mucus structure is attained by coarse filler particles (1-10 microns) with a rather weak surface charge, while the second reorganization is attained by colloidal particles (1-10 millimicrons) with a very high surface charge. The principle reactions are in both cases the same, a ionic binding of glucose chains (starch chains) to the surface of particles. The second reaction is much more intensive, however, resulting in the formation of more dense and dehydrated mucus or gel droplets with increased tendency to irreversible agglomeration, that can stand the draining forces. The second reaction with colloidal inorganic polymers may be performed before any ceiluiosic fibers have been mixed into the furnish. It may also be performed after mixing with cellulose fibers, but then allowed to have a reaction time of 10-60 seconds before diluted with backwater at the paper machine. The synerese reaction of the secondary mucous structure to the tertiary gel structure is fast but not spontanous. It is also possible to divide this second reaction in two steps, one part before mixing with ceiluiosic furnish and another part after. The latter may be advisable, if ground wood fibers are going to be used, because wood fibers are contaminated with anionic and lipid compounds that interfere with the reaction. If the reaction is divided in two steps, it is further advisable to use a polyaluminium compound at the first step and a poiysiiicic acid compound in the second, or the reverse. The amount of inorganic, colloidal polymers, required, are rather low, below 10%, mostly between 1 and 5% of the starch content, which means 0,1-0,5% of the filler weight, calculated as SiO., or A1-0-. In most cases 0,1-0,3% is sufficient if the secondary structure is well developed and not aged more than some hours. If the secondary structure is weakend by age or by too high content of polyacid or "poisoned?' by ionic and lipid contaminants, a primary curing should be made with an poly-Al-complex and a secondary curing with a silicic acid polymer. The fiber component of the furnish may consist of kraft sulfate or sulphite fibers, preferably refined to a somewhat higher degree than normaly used for the type of paper concerned. It can also consist of ground wood fibers. According to the invention a very high filler content of 30- 60% of the paper weight can be used without substantial loss of strength and other important properties, which is shown in the following examples. It is obvious that the invention can be practised also in other ways than described as optimal above. For instance, the cationic starch may be swollen in pure water to a certain degree and without prolonged cooking, whereupon the anionic polyacid is added. Such a proceeding is suitable for laboratory purposes but difficult to keep within reproducible limits in an industrial scale with large volumes. Other fillers can be used for instance talc, titaniumdioxide etc. but kaolin and chalk (limestone-powder) are the most common and most economical. A combinaison of kaolin and chalk has the advantage of keeping the furnish pH constant at around 7, where curing action is most efficient. Rosin sizing and other sizing e.g. with Aquapei for rendering the paper water-resistent do not influence disadvantageous on the process, if these chemicals are added to the fiber furnish before mixing with the furnish of mucus enveloped filler. Again, it is of advantage to arrange for the formation of the tertiary structure of starch-polyacid-filler in absence of other anionic, cationic and lipid contaminations. Cationized starches of various origins can be used as corn, tapioca, wheat etc. but at least in Europe potato starch are prefered due to low price and suitable types of starch grains. Also other polyacids than carboxy- lic and silicic acids can be used as synthetic sulfonic acids and phosphorous acids but of linear type, plus various acid combinations. Example 1. 20 g of chalk with average particle size of 4 micron was slurried in water to a 25% slurry. Further an amphoteric mucous dispersion of 2% concentra¬ tion was prepared in the following way. 2g of a high viscosity cationic starch (CS) was dispersed in cold water (100ml) in which had been dissolved 0,05g CMC or 2,5 parts CMC per 100 parts CS. The cationic starch (Perfec- tamyl PW) had a DS of 0,033, while the CMC-product (7LF from Hercules Corp.) had a DS of 0,70 and a low-medium molecular weight. This is a very pure product (food grade) which we used in laboratory tests in order to avoid contaminations. The mixture was swollen during mild agitation and cooked for 10 min. at 95° when it yielded a lightly turbide and low viscosity suspension. The amphoteric mucus dispersion was added hot to the chalk slurry, thus, in an amount corresponding to 10% CS and 0,25% CMC on chalk weight. The mixture got a finely agglomerated structure, while the mucus-like composition enclosed the filler particles. After 10 min. a solution of hexasili- cic acid was added in an amount corresponding to 3% SiO- on weight of CS O PI < ~ °' (and 0,3% on weight of chalk). The agglomeration turned to a coarser charac¬ ter of 1-3 mm lumps while the water phase turned totaly clear. The hexa- silicic acid had been prepared by diluting commercial waterglass (ratio 3,3) to a solution containing 2% SiO- and then neutralizing half the alkali content by sulfuric acid, whereupon the siloxane polymerization was allowed to proceed during 60 minutes before use. 20g cellulose, bleached kraft, 60% hardwood and 40% softwood, and refined to 30°SR was suspended in a turmix and mixed with 0,5% Aqua- is pel on weight of cellulose. Then the cured starch-mucus suspension was added to the cellulose under intensive agitation. The final furnish then had a composition corresponding to : Cellulose 47,2% Chalk 47,2% CS-CMC 5,12% Si0 2 0,13% Aquapel 0,25% (emulsion) The furnish was divided in 10 parts and handsheets made with a gram mage of 100g/m 2 . The backwater was controlled and was found to be totally clear. The weight of the 10 handsheets were 42,20g compared with the dry solid weight of the furnish of 42,12g. The retention, consequen¬ tly, was 100% and the paper formation very good. The paper properties were : Tensil index 33 Nm/g O p a c i t y 96 % Elongation 2,9% Brightness 77% Wax value 15 Example 2. The same test was made as in example 1), only with the difference that the 2,5% CMC was replaced by 1,5% polyacrylic acid (Na-salt). The retention value was also in this case close to 100%. Percentage figures for CMC and acrylic acid refers to weight of cationic starch. The paper properties were : Tensil index 29 Nm/g and Wax value 13, according to Dennison. OMPI Example 3. The same test was made as in example 1), only with the difference that the 2,5% CMC was replaced by 2,5% alginic acid (DP=300). Then cellulose furnish with Aquapel was mixed into the filler-mucus-slurry. The resulting agglomeration was then very fine (no coarse lumps), and just before formation of the handsheets a polymer aluminium sulfate solution prepared by neutra¬ lization of 1/3 of the acid content by NaOH was added in an amount corres¬ ponding to 0,2% Al-0- on chalk bases (2% on starch bases). The resulting agglomeration was very fine with quite clear backwater. The paper formation was excellent and the calculated retention of filler 96%. Tensil index : 32 Nm/g Wax value : 15. Example 4. 20g kaolin (dry) English grade E with an average particle size of 2-5 u were slurried in water to a 25% slurry. To this slurry was added the same amphoteric CS-CMC composition an in example 1 (CMC/CS=2,5/100) in an amount corresponding to 10,25% on bases of kaolin. After encapsulation of the filler by mucus, 1,0% SiO- as waterglass was added on base of the starch (0,1% on base of kaolin). The same cellulose was used as in example 1, but without Aquapel Filler/cellulose=l/l. After having mixed the kaolin suspension with the fiber furnish under moderate agitation, (the fine agglomerates does not need any violent agitation for uniform distribution), a polymer Al-sulfate solution, neutralized to 33%, was added in an amount corresponding to 0,2% Al-0- on the kaolin. Again 10 handsheets with grammage 100g/m 2 was made and the calculated retention was 98%. The backwater showed only a very slight turbidity. In order to reach this retention the agglomeration had to be improved by adjusting the pH of the furnish after Al-addition to 5,5. The hand sheets showed the following properties : Tensil index 28 Nm/g, Elongation 2,2%, Wax value 11, Opacity 98% and Brightness 75%. Example 5. 20 g kaolin (dry weight) grade E (2-5 micron) was slurried in 60g water to which was added 0,2g common waterglass, corresponding to 0,25% SiO- on kaolin weight. 2g CS (DS=0,035) was slurried in 50g water to which had been added another 0,2g waterglass (Si0 2 /Na-0=3,3) and then heated and OM?I cooked during 10 minutes. The hot and swollen starch suspension was added to the kaolin slurry under formation of a high visgous slurry of mucous dro¬ plets with enclosed kaolin. The ratio SiO-/CS was 5/100 of the formed mucus-filler structure. After 30 min it was added a further 2 parts of SiO-/ 100 CS, but now as "hexasilicic acid" (waterglass in which 50% of the alkali had been neutralized with sulfuric acid in diluted solution during 60 min.). This resulted in separation of mucus-filler-agglomerates which changed to more rigid gel agglomerates separated from a clear water-phase. To this agglomerated gel structure was added a furnish of 20g cellulose (as in ex. 1, but with sulfate rosin as hydrophobic agent in stead of Aquapel ). Upon efficient agitation, the agglomerates were dispersed and paper sheets were formed after neutralizing the alkalin furnish with polyaluminiumsulfate (1/3 neutralized) to a furnish pH of 5,8. The retention was estimated to 98% yielding a paper of 50% filler. Tensil index was 29Nm/g and Dennison wax pick up 13. Example 6 This example is presented in order to show the effect of the amphoteric CS-CMC-binder on a cellulose paper without filler. First a standard paper was produced from the cellulose of example 1 without any additions neither of filler nor of starch binder. The retention was anyhow above 97% and the pure cellulose paper showed a tensil index of 57 Nm/g and a wax value of only 13. Secondly a paper was produced of cellulose without any filler but with 5% amphoteric CS-CMC-composition on cellulose bases. The ampho¬ teric composition was the same as in example 1 CMC/CS = 2,5/100. Before the handsheet forming the cellulose-starch furnish was supplied with 0,15% Al-0, as a polymeric Al-sulfate (neutralized to 33%), calculated on the dry weight of cellulose. The retention was in this case slightly above 100% including the starch and curing components. The paper showed a tensil index of 62 Nm/g and a rearkable wax value of 23. This example shows that the amphoteric CS-CMC-binder has the most profound effect on the M 2-strength when applied to a furnish of only cellulose. OMPI Example 7. The following test was performed on an experimental paper machine. 50 kg chalk (4 micron) was dispersed in water to a 25% slurry. Further a slurry of 5 kg CS (DS 0,035) was prepared in 100 liters of water containing 0,12 kg CMC (DS 0,7) of a Swedish SCA-grade called FF20, with Brookfield visco¬ sity 20cps at 2% cone. After 10 min. cooking the hot CS-CMC-product was diluted to 2,5% and added to the chalk-filler-slurry, yielding a filler-mucus- slurry with 10% , C5 on chalk and 2,4 parts CMC per 100 parts CS. The filler-mucus-slurry was then mixed with 50kg cellulose (50% hardwood and 50% softwood, refined to 30°SR) in a 4% consistency, and containing 0,4% Aquapel hydrophobing emulsion. The mixed furnish showed a very fine agglomeration of mucus-filler-droplets together with the fibers. To the mixed furnish was then added 1% Al-0, on CS w. as a complex polyaluminium-citrate-suifate-solution. This complex had been prepared by dissolving 1 mol Al-sulfate in 2 lit. water, adding 1/3 mol of citric acid, and finally adding 5-n NaOH during 3 hours corresponding to a neutralization of 5/6 of the sulfuric acid of the Al-sulfate. After this addition the furnish agglomerated further and a totally clear water phase was obtained. The furnish was allowed to stay over the night. The next day it was charged to the experimental paper machine during addition of 3% SiO- on CS-weight as hexasilicic acid (disodiumsalt). The solution of hexasilicic acid salt was prepared by dissolving precipitated and washed silicic acid in waterglass to a ratio Si0-/Na_0=6,0. The hexasilicic acid was allowed to react with the furnish during 40 seconds before dilution with backwater. The furnish was fast draining on the wire, and the machine worked without any problems or interruptions. The paper dried very fast and the filler retention was estimated to 91%. Grammage 75 g/m 2 Gurley 13 s. Density 780 kg/m J Cobb 15 g/m 2 Tensil index V MS 33 kNm/kg Unger b. s./2 27 g/m 2 Burst index 2,0 MN/kg Brightn. b s/s 77 % Tear index VMS 5,5 Nm7kg Opacity 92 % Elong. at break 2,5 % Filler cont. 45 % Dennison Wax both -sides/2 16 O PI

Claims: AMENDED CLAIMS (received by the International Bureau on 22 January 1982 (22.01.82)) l.(new) Paper manufacturing process, c h a r a c t e r i z e d by the stepf of : a) preparing an amphoteric mucus like composition by reacting 100 parts of a cationic starch with a low degree of substitution of 0,02-0,10 in a waterswollen state with 1-8 parts of an anionic linear (non-starch) polymer with a high degree of substitution of 0,5-1,0 to a hydrated but substantially insoluble mucus composition, suspended in water - the primary structure. b) preparing a mucus coated structure of fillers and/or ceiluiosic fibers by mixing a slurry of fillers and/or fibers with the water suspended composition according to a) - the secondary structure. c) reorganizing the mucus coating according to b) to a less hydrated and mechanically resistant gel coating by adding a colloidal solution of polymer microparticles consisting of polysilicic acid with 5-50 Si0_-units per polymer or of a polyaluminium-oxi-compound (basic Al-compound), in which the Al-valencies are partly neutralized and replaces by oxi bridges (-0- groups) - the tertial structure. d) processing the obtained gel coated filler/fiber structure accor¬ ding to c) as a paper making furnish or part thereof. 2.(new) Process according to claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the primary mucus structure according to step a) consists of the reaction product between a cationic starch, CS, with a degree of substitution of 0,02-0,05 quarternized amino groups per glucose unite and carboxymethyl cellulose, CMC, with a degree of substitution of 0,50-0,90 in an amount of 1-5 parts of CMC per 100 parts of CS. OMPI 3.(new) Process according to claims 1 and 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d the primary mucus structure according to step a) consists of the reaction product between cationic starch, CS, with a degree of substitution of 0,02- 0,05 quarternized amino groups per glucose unit and an anionic polymer of the following group or mixtures thereof including CMC, the group consis¬ ting of the following members and present in the following amounts : alginic acid (polyuronic acid) DS=1 1-8 p/100 p CS polyacrylic acid DS=1 1-2 p/100 p CS tri-tetra-silicic acid DS=0,5-0,7 1-6 p/100 p CS said primary mucus structure first being brought in contact with fillers and/or fibers to form a coating on them according to step b) and secondly being reorganized to a resistant structure by adding a colloidal solution of polymer microparticles of polysilicic acid and/or polyaluminium-oxi- compounds according to step c). 4.(new) Process according to claims 1 to 3, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the secondary structure consists of kaolin filler, chalk filler, ceiluio¬ sic fibers including groundwood and second grade fibers, coated with the primary mucus structure in an amount of 2-20% dry weight on weight of filler or 1-8% on weight of fibers, said secondary structure being reorganized by adding a colloidal solution of polymer microparticles of polysilicic acid or polyaluminium-oxi-compounds. 5.(new) Process according to claims I to 4, the reorganization of the secondary coated structure is achieved by adding a colloidal solution of polysilicic acid (microparticles) with a degree of polymerization of 5-50 (Si0--units per polymer) in an amount less than 10% and preferably between 1-5% calculated as SiO- on the weight of CS used. 6.(new) Process according to claims l to , c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the reorganization of the secondary coated structure is achieved by adding a colloidal solution of polyaluminium-oxi-compounds (microparticles) in which the Ai-valencies are partly neutralized to about 1/3 leaving a polymer unit of X 2 Al-0-, where X means a valency of a strong acid, said polyaluminium-oxi-compound being added in an amount less than 10% and preferably between 1-5% calculated as A1 2 , on the weight of CS used. 7.(new) Process according to claims 1 to 4 in which the polyaluminium- oxi-compound consists of a complex with citric acid, having the approximative unite formula in fully hydrated form Al^OHLCi^-SO^ or in the correspon¬ ding dehydrated form Ah O.Ci - + .So " , where Ci is an equivalent of citric acid. 8.(new) Process according to claims 1 to 7, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that the reorganization of the secondary structure is performed in two steps with different colloids, the first step performed at a high concentration of the secondary structure with a colloidal solution of polysilicic acid and the second step performed in a diluted furnish (before the head box) with a colloidal solution of polyaluminium-oxi-compounds or in the reverse order, with the aluminium-oxi-compound added to step 1 and the silicic acid poly¬ mer to step 2, said colloidal solutions added in amount corresponding to 1-5% calculated as Si0-+Al-0, on the weight of CS used. 9.(new) Product combination for performing the process claimed in claims l to 8, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in that is consists of a dry mixture of a cationic starch with DS=0,02-0,05 and CMC with DS=0,50-0,90 or/and the sodium salt of alginic acid with DS=1,0 in an amount corresponding to 1-5 parts of the anionic cponent/components per 100 parts of cationic starch. STATEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 19 Regarding the new claims 1 to 9, we have to give the following background information. 1. This claim refers to earlier claims 1-2. The relative amount of anionic polymer to CS is now included in claim I. The figure 1-8 parts/ 100 parts CS is taken from page 3, lines 25-26. In order to emphasize the importance of step c) and the very different action of common alum according to the references cited and "the colloidal polymer microparticles" required in our process, step c) has been described more in detail. For background see our application page 7, line 9 to page 8, line 13. 2. This claim is the same as earlier claim 3 not stated as relevant to any cited document. 3. This new claim refers to earlier claim 4. In order to emphasize that step c) of claim 1 creates technical novelty with respect to documents cited, the proceedings of step c) has been repeated. The amount, claimed refer to figures on page 3, line 26, line 21 and page 4, lines 1 and 14. In ex 4) 1% Si0 2 on weight of starch. 4. This new claim corresponds to earlier claim 5 but with emphasize on step c). O PI 5. This new claim is a division of earlier claim 6, dealing only with pentasiiicic acid and higher polymers. See further our application page 7, line 9-34. The preparation of products is described in ex. I and ex. 7 (p. 13 1. 21-24). 6. This new claim is also a division of earlier claim 6, dealing only with polyaluminium-oxi-compounds as reorganization agents of step c). The description of 1/3-neutralization is to be found in our examples 3, 4, 5 and 6. Remark : these Al-compounds are new marketed i.e. by Japanese Nissan Co. as "polyaluminium- compounds" according to our earlier concept, but we have now choosen to name them chemically more correct "polyaluminium- oxi-compounds". 7. This new claim is identical with previous claim 7, but "explained" in order to get it in agreement with the terminology of polyalumi¬ nium-oxi-compounds. 8. This is a new claim, made in order to emphasize the importance of step c), and to show how this step can be divided and perfor¬ med in various substeps. For the background in the application we refer to page 8, lines 1-13 and ex.7, which utilizes this divided technique. 9. This new claim is the same as previous claim 9, but we have restricted it to CMC and alginic acid as components of anionic polymers. The reason for our restriction is that dry mixtures with polyaerylamide containing acrylic acid groups are so frequently described in the cited documents.

Inventors: SUNDEN A, SUNDEN O
Applicants: SUNDEN A, SUNDEN O
Application year: 1981
Main classification: D21H3
IPC codes: D21H17