TORSION RESISTANT FORCEPS

Abstract: Torsion resistant forceps, suitable to be manufactured in synthetic materials, comprising two arms (2, 3) with tips (14, 15), which arms are flexibly connected at a joint (4). In order to, among other things, prevent the arms from crossing past each other at gripping, the base of the arms at the connection has been designed with a large width. Preferably, the ratio between the length of the arms and the width of the bases is between 2:1 and 7:1.

Description: Torsion resistant forceps. Technical field. The present invention relates to a forceps with a torsion resistant design. Especially the invention relates 5. to disposable or reusable such a forceps made in plastic material. Background of the invention. A problem in connectionwith the design of forceps is that these must have a good lateral stability in order to 10 avoid that the arms of the forceps at gripping pass each other like a pair of scissors, so that the grip is lest. These problems increase, when a finer grip and a thinner tip are tried to obtain. The- problems also increase, when metal is abandoned as construction material and less rigid 15. material like plastics is used. Efforts have been made to cope with these problems by arranging different kinds of guiding tins on the interior sides of the forceps arms in order to avoid lateral displace¬ ment of the arms in relation to each other. These types of 20. constructions, however, give bad lateral stability before the guiding mechanism has come into action, which means, that a lateral displacement can occur at the beginning of the movement, so that the guiding mechanism does net work at all. Further problems arise at gripping of -larger object 25 and it happens, that mops of e.g. cotton get stuck to the guide pins. Examples of constructions of is--fcin-eL-are - disclosed in the US patent specifications 2.082.062, 3.1**0.715, 3-2 β 5.0 β 8, 3-367.336, 3.653.389 and 4.0*4^.771. General description of the invention. 30 The object of the present invention is to offer a orceps construcl ch presents a very good lateral stability and torsion resistance without occurrence of the abovementioned problems. Another object of the invention is to offer a construction suitable for simple manu acturing 35- in plastic materials. A further object of the invention is to offer a forceps with numerous fields of application. These objects are reached with a forceps, having the characteristics of the appended claims. In the usual manner the forceps has two arms, v/hich are rnovably joined at a connection. According to the inven- 5. tion the arms have a wide base at the connection line, whereby an increased stability is obtained against lateral displacements of the arms. A further improvement of the stability is obtained, if the front parts of the arms have a design rigid to bending, while the rear parts, positioned 10. at the joint, have a flexible design. If furthermore the rigid part of the arms has a substantially straight design, the risk is minimized for small deflections in load to cause rotational moments crossing the arms past each other. Fur¬ ther improvements of the stability are obtained, if the 15. flexible rear parts of the arms are kept short in relation to the rigid front parts and if the joint area for the arms not only is wide but also has an essential thickness. Furthe advantages of the invention will be apparent from the de¬ tailed description below. 20. Detailed description of the invention. According to the invention the arms shall have a wide base at the connection between these. A suitable ratio between the length of the arms and the width of the base is between 7:1 and 2:1. Preferably the ratio is between 6:1 25. and 2:1 and most preferably between 5:1 and 3:1. Such a design seans that the arms cannot easily move laterally ~~ tn relation to each other. -It is also desirable that the point of connection is designed in such a way that an essential rigidity against 30. rotation is obtained. This can be achieved by giving the connection area not only a large width but also a substantia thickness, preferably being, at least at one part, thicker than the added thicknesses of the arms at the connection. This is preferably achieved by a separation of the arms 35- from each other at the connection via a rounded off or flat bottom between the arms. The resulting accumulation of material gives an increased torsion resistance, which prevents the connection area from bending at one arm, so that the arms are mutually deflected. The arms are sutiably divided in a, in respect of bending, rigid front part and a flexible rear part close to the connection. The purpose thereof is, that all of the 5. elastic bending, when pressing the arms together, substan¬ tially shall take place in the material in the rear flexible parts of the arms, while the remaining parts of the arms maintain their principle shape. As the flexible parts are found at the wide and torsion resistant part of the con- 10. struction, the lateral rigidity can be maintained in spite of the flexibility. The flexible part shall, hov/ever, be kept as short as possible, and rather be made thin than long in order to maxi aze the lateral rigidity. Hence, it is preferred, that the length of the flexible part is less 15. than 1:10 of the length of the rigid front part of the arms, and most preferably less than 1:12 of this part . - A suitable profile for the flexible part is rectangular. The part of the arms, rigid to bending, shall, as said, constitute the major part of the arms. The bending 20. resistance can be obtained in several well-known ways but preferably the rigidity is obtained by arranging beams at the interior side of the arms, especially so that the arm profiles hereby become T-shaped. The rigid part of the arms shall be as straight as possible in design when 25. viewed from the side. An arched design increases the torsional moment on the arms at small deflections in load, at the increased risk of ' crossing the arms. Suitably, the stiffening extends from the flexible rear part of the arms up to the tip area, which can, in respect of the intended 30. use, have a separate design. Nor is it necessary to make the tip area straight, provided that this constitutes a minor part of the arm length. As a result of the torsion resistant design the tips can advantageously be made narrow', and it is preferred, that the arms as a whole have a shape, 35'. when vertically looked upon, mainly corresponding to an isosceles triangle. The interior sides of the tips should be slightly bevelled, so that the forceps begins its gripping at its outermost part. Behind the tip area the inner sides of the arms can be provided with coarse serrations, preferably by means of grooves in the stiffen beams, whereby the grasping of larger objects by using th 5. parts of the forceps will be possible, e.g. plastic tubes catheterization. This will considerably increase the fiel of application of the forceps. The forceps can be manufactured in metal but prefe ably they are made of synthetic materials and especially 10. then plastic materials like polyethene. Polypropene mixed with glass fibres has turned out to be a very suitable material. Injection moulding is a preferred manufacturing method. Short description of the drawings. 15. The figure sheet shows a preferred ombodyment of t foreceps of the invention. Figure 1 shows the forceps in an open position in side view. Figure 2 shows the forceps in a closed position also in side view. Figure 3 shows th forceps in plan view. 20. Description of the drawings. Position 1 indicates a flat handle part, intended to give the forceps a more applicable form for holding. The two arms 2 and 3, respectively, are connected at k 3 where the material thickness has been increased, forming 25. a flat portion between the arms at the connection line. Closest to connection 4, the arms consist of flexible part 5 and 6, respectively, with principally a rectangular cros section. The remaining parts of the arms are rigid, in respect of bending, through the presence of stiffening be 30. 7 and 8 on the inner sides of the arms. The front parts of the beams are equipped with coarse serrations 9 and 10, respectively, suitable for grasping of e.g. plastic tubes. Figure 3 shows the. wide design of the forceps at the con¬ nection point 11 for the arms. On the exterior sides of th 35- arms there are serrations 12 and 13, respectively, allowin a safe grip. The tips 1*4 and 15, respectively, of the arms are designed with a flat surface along a part of the arm lengths, and the beams 7 and 8 form a continuation of thjμ Claims . 1. Forceps comprising two arms (2, 3) with tips (1 , 15) and a connection (■*■!) to the arms, c a r a c ¬ t e r i z e d in, that the arms (2,3) have a wide base 5. at the connection. 2. The forceps of claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the ratio between the length of the arms and the width of the base is between 7:1 and 2:1. 3. The forceps of claim 2, c h a r a c t e r i z e d 10. in, that the ratio is between 5:1 and 3:1. ^1. The forceps of claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the arms (2, 3) comprise, in respect of bending, rigid front parts, principally with straight form and flexible rear parts (5 > 6)closest to the connection (• ■ •!)• 15. 5- The forceps of claim -4, c h a r a c t e r i s e d in, that the front parts of the arms (2, 3) are made re¬ sistant to bending by arranging stiffening beans (7, 8) along the interior sides of the arms up to the tips (1*4, 20. 6. The forceps of claim 5, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the beams (7, 8) principally give a T-shaped cross- section to the arms. 7. The forceps of claim -4 or 5, c h a r a c t e ¬ r i z e d in, that the interior sides of the arms (2, 3) 25. have serrations (9, 10) at a distance from the tips (14, 15). 8. The forceps of claim -4, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the length of the flexible rear parts (5, 6) is shorter than 1:10 of the length of the rigid front parts 30. of the arms (2, 3) • 9. The forceps of claim 8, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the ratio is less than 1:12. 10. The forceps of claim 1, c h a r a c t e r i z e d in, that the arms (2, 3) in plan viexv have a shape, which 35. principally corresponds to an isosceles triangle.

Claims: flat surfaces. As best can be seen from figure 2 the tip surfaces are bevelled, so that the outermost parts of the tips firstly meet at the compression of the arms. From figure 3 can be seen, that the tips are narrow and that 5. the arms have the principal shape of an isosceles triangle, v/hich, however, more rapidly tapers off towards the tip. From figures 1 and 2 can be seen, that the arms 2 and 3 principally are of a straight design between the flexible parts 5 and 6, respectively, and the tips 1*4 and 15, 10. respectively, close to which the arms arch to form a thinner tip. When pressing the arms 2 and 3 together, these will substantially remain straight as a result of their rigid design, while* the flexure takes place at the flexible rear parts 5 and 6: The short parts 5 and 6, 15. the rigid connection -4, the wide base 11 of the arms and their straight and, in respect of bending, rigid design are features giving excellent torsion rigidity and lateral stability to the arms with a very small risk of crossing the arms past each other when gripping.

Inventors: WANNAG A
Applicants: WANNAG A
Application year: 1981
Main classification: A61B17
IPC codes: A45D26, A61B17, B25B9