APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DOUBLE END STUD WELDING

Abstract: In simultaneously arc welding studs with plural ends a problem exists maintaining the arc at each end of the stud. A method, welding gun (20) and specific stud (10) configuration are disclosed for maintaining the arc in stud welding. The stud (10) has plural projections (19) extending from its ends (14, 15). The method and gun (20) maintains a current density sufficient to disintegrate only a portion of each projection (19), thus permitting the remaining projections (19) to contact the base metal (11) causing a short to extinguish the arc at one projection (19) while permitting subsequent arcing at the next projection that touches the base metal. The procedure, proceeds randomly from projection (19) to projection (19) until the ends of the stud (14, 15), reach the molten pool. The gun (20) has a footpiece (22) for alignment of the stud (10) and for maintaining an arc shield (23), used in the method, in place.

Description: Description APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DOUBLE END STUD WELDING Technical Field The invention relates to the simultaneous welding of the plurality of ends of a metallic stud to a workpiece utilizing stud end welding techniques. Background Art The present invention relates to stud welding apparatus and methods and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for welding, by the stud end welding technique, a stud having a plural ty of ends which are to be simultaneously welded to a workpiece. The stud end welding technique has been known and in practical commercial use for many years. In this welding technique, a single end of a metallic member, such as a threaded bolt or the like, is welded to a metallic member generally known as a base member by the application of sufficiently high current passing through the stud and across an arc between the stud and the workpiece to create a molten pool of metal into which the stud is ultimately plunged and secured following solidification of the molten pool. There are many variations of this technique. However, the technique is generally divided into two major categories, i.e. arc stud welding and capacitor discharge stud welding. In arc stud welding, current is passed through the stud to be welded while in contact with the workpiece and then lifted to create an arc between the stud and workpiece. After sufficient time passes to permit the arc to create melting of the stud and workpiece, the stud is returned to the workpiece into the molten pool of metal. In this mode of welding, an arc shield is placed around the end of the stud and in contact with the workpiece to contain the molten pool of metal to form a weld fillet following solidification of the metal. This technique is used for larger diameter studs or the conventional shear connectors in ranges in excess of V of diameter. The arc stud welding technique generally employs only a rounded configuration on the end of the stud to be welded. The current density passing through the end of the stud being welded is rela¬ tively low compared to capaci ' tor discharge welding as will Be dis¬ cussed hereinafter and is generally in the area of approximately 5,000 amps per square inch. The weld time for arc stud welding varies depending on the application and the diameter of the stud but it is generally in the area of approximately .5 seconds for an average application for welding of a _" stud. Thus, arc stud welding is generally considered to be a longer low current welding process with essentially arc creation resulting in melting of the stud and the workpiece with little or no significant instantaneous disintegration of the end of the stud. The capaci ' tor discharge stud welding technique differs signifi¬ cantly from the arc stud end welding technique in many ways. In capacitor discharge stud welding, the power source is not a continu- ous source as in arc stud welding but is a stored energy source such as that from a bank of capacitors which have been charged to a pre¬ determined level before initiation of the welding cycle. Addition¬ ally, the studs utilized in capacitor discharge stud welding are usually of a small diameter in the range of V or less and also include a small diameter and length welding tip on the end of the stud. The welding tip serves to space the end of the stud to be welded from the workpiece at the beginning of the welding cycle. Upon initiation of the welding cycle, the readily available energy supply from the energy source such as the capacitors is dumped through the stud at an extremely high current density resulting in complete disintegration and vaporization of the welding tip. The disintegration of the welding tip momentarily leaves the stud spaced from the workpiece while an arc is established between the stud and the workpiece substantially along the entire face of the stud due to the high energy level of the capacitors. In an average capacitor discharge stud welding environment, the current density passing through the tip of the welding stud is, momentarily, in the range of approximately 10,000,000 amps per square inch. This flash of high density current is substantially instan- taneous and the entire weld cycle for an average capacitor discharge welding cycle is approximately .003 seconds. Capacitor discharge welding is used primarily for rather small studs, high production rates and with, thin sheet base material which cannot withstand the longer welding and heating cycles of arc stud welding. Additionally, the weld strength of a capacitor discharge weld is somewhat less than that of the arc stud welding technique. The stud end welding technique, either arc stud welding or capacitor discharge stud welding, has not, heretofore, been success¬ fully used in the welding of studs having two or more ends which require to be welded simultaneously to the base member. There are numerous stud configurations which have two or more ends which are required to be welded and thus cannot utilize the stud end welding technique. Examples of such studs are double ended lifting hooks * , handles and hold-down loops all of which must be welded by electric or gas hand welding. Another major category of stud which includes two or more ends and which must currently be hand welded is the double ended shear connector. A double ended shear connector is a U-shaped metallic member which is welded to an I-beam or the like and is later embedded in concrete lying upon the I-beam to provide a shear interconnection between the concrete slab lying upon the beam and the beam itself. There are basically two types of shear connectors in use in the industry today. The first kind is the headed shear connector which is an elongate rod like member having one end weldable thereon and an enlarged flanged head at the opposite end. This stud is generally of round configuration and of approximately 3/4 inches in diameter and is capable of being welded by the conventional arc stud welding technique. The other design of shear connector conventionally in use is a generally U-shaped member of rectangular cross section of approximately eight gage thickness and 1 inches wide with a height of approximately 3 inches and a separation of the two legs of approximately 4 5/8 inches. This class of shear connector may be referred to as the double ended shear connector whereas the single elongate shear connector is generally known as the headed shear connector. A double ended shear connector of less total metal weight than O.V.PI VirO _ - > ' a headed shear connector can still provide equal or greater shear resistance when welded in place. Thus, the material costs and per¬ formance of a double ended shear connector is superior to that of a headed shear connector. However, the double ended shear connector suffers from the disadvantage in that it must be manually welded and has not, heretofore, been capable of being welded by the stud end welding technique. The hand welding technique is more time consuming than he stud end welding technique and, additionally, the skill re¬ quired to manually weld the double ended shear connector is greater than that required of the operator for the stud end welding technique with the further consequent addition of expense in the trade utilized. Accordingly, there is a real industry need for a method and apparatus to weld double ended shear connectors by the stud end welding technique. Different techniques have, in the past, been attempted to arrive at apparatus and methods to .successfully weld multi-ended studs. The foremost problem encountered with the welding operation of double ended studs is the initiation of an arc on both legs of the stud. If the arc initiates on one leg and nothing is done to enhance initiation on the other leg, the arc will continue to operate on the first leg and the second arc will not be initiated. There are two main reasons for this occurrence. First, the operating arc will cause a large voltage drop from the open circuit voltage. This will make it in¬ creasingly difficult to break down the air gap resistance at the unarcing leg. Secondly, the heating of the arcing leg will lower the work function and increase the electron flow at that point, effec¬ tively lowering the resistance. These two effects combine to make it extremely difficult to initiate a second arc at the remaining legs once there has been the establishment of a first arc. The desired solution to this problem of single arc initiation is to initiate arcs * on both legs of the stud simultaneously. However, with the conventional stud welding apparatus and method of stud lift¬ off initiation, it is nearly impossible to maintain equal initial arc gaps. Even a very small difference in gap size works to prevent one arc from starting because the breakdown voltage can be in the order of " ~ 1,000 volts/mil. in air. Both legs- must leave the base plate surface at exactly the same time or only one arc will occur. Assuming that dual arcs can be initiated, the second problem encountered is to insure that equal welding takes place on both legs of the stud. Essentially, this means that equal welding currents must be maintained in both legs. Differences in current readily result from such conditions as oxides on the work surface or suttle changes in metal transferred through either arc. Accordingly, it is extremely difficult if not impossible to maintain equal current den- sity in the welding legs and thus, uneven melting occurs with the consequence of one leg of the double ended stud welding not being sufficiently welded. One attempt made at solving the problem of uneven arcing between the two legs of a double ended stud was to place an insulator between the two legs and apply separate current sources to the welding legs. Such a concept is disclosed in U. S. Patent No. 2,788,434. This solution suffers the rather critical disadvantage of the two legs of the stud being separated by a weak insulator between the two legs which seriously reduces the strength of the stud. Another solution tried was to vary the geometry of the ends of the double ended stud by utilizing such configurations as chisel points as well as * other configurations such as pointed ends, rounded ends and square ends. In some cases, fluxes were used to help lower the ionization potential and provide a shielding atmosphere. The use of differing stud end configurations and fluxes did not prove success¬ ful. In a few cases, two arcs would occur at the two legs. However, one arc was always larger than the other. The smaller arc usually produced no melting of either the stud or the base plate. The lighter arc generally became nothing more than a brief spark which caused slight heating of the stud and the base plate. The utilization of fluxes aided slightly in the process but still did not result in sound commercially acceptable welds. Even compounds that exhibit lower ionization potential and higher electroconductivity than iron, although aiding in establishing arcs on both stud legs, did not effectively equalize or maintain the required dual arcs. Another approach which ha been investigated but found unsuccess¬ ful for double ended stud welding is that based upon the principles of arc gap effect and arc initiation and thermal emissiyity at elevated temperatures. In this approach, the hypothesis i ' s that, if the arc could be briefly extinguished on the operating leg by removal of thewelding power, then the arc could be reignited on the opposite leg by virtue of that being the shortest arc path. It was postulated that, in order for the shorter path effect to dominate, the time that the arc was extinguished would have to be sufficient to allow a com- plete dissipation of the electron cloud and for the arc atmosphere to cool below levels * where thermal ignition effects dominate. In this approach, the power supply providing the welding current to the double ended welding stud was operated through a controller in a manner such that the welding current was rapidly turned on and off to the welding stud in bursts of energy spaced one from another in the order of 100 milliseconds. In some instances, dual arcing at both legs of the double ended stud were achieved. However, control of positioning the stud with respect to the workpiece was extremely delicate and difficult and the control of the arcing between the two legs was erratic and generally unsatisfactory welds resulted. Disclosure of Invention The foregoing problems encountered in welding of studs having two or more ends by the stud end welding technique are overcome by the studs, methods and apparatus * as hereinafter described. In accordance with the present invention, the welding ends of the multi-ended stud are modified to include at least one elongate relatively thin projection or wire extending from each welding end of the stud. In larger studs, two or more projections or wires are employed for each stud end. The stud welding apparatus includes a chuck for securing the stud which is of configuration complementary to the upper portion of the double ended stud. The chuck maintains the welding stud in proper orientation with respect to the weld base in order that the projec¬ tions will strike the weld base essentially simultaneously. The welding apparatus further includes a welding gun footpiece which --"~~'~ "" ■** secures two arc shields properly in place in alignment with the welding ends of the double ended stud. In accordance with the method of the present invention, the stud is energized prior to the welding projections contacting the weld base. The stud is moved toward the welding base at a predetermined rate with a predetermined pressure being applied to the stud against the weld base during the weld cycle. The welding power supply utilized is a continuous current welding supply. The welding power supply is operated in a manner to provide welding current density across * the welding tip projections or wires of a density sufficient to disintegrate only a portion of each projection permitting consequent arc initiation across the re¬ maining portion of the projection. The consequent disintegration and arcing at a given projection will cause metal melting and shorten- ing of the projection permitting the stud to further descent with the consequent contact of further projections. Upon contact of the further projections with the weld base, shorting occurs with the result of extinguishment of the arc at the projection at which arcing was occurring. The short results in disintegration of the welding projection experiencing the shorting condition with consequent disintegration of that welding tip and arc establishment, which process continues from welding stud projection to projection until the projections are consumed whereupon the stud ends reach the molten pools of metal formed by the arcing. Other features, advantages and variations of the studs, apparatus and methods of multi-ended stud welding of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description thereof which follows taken in conjunction with the drawing. Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 is a perspective view, partially in section, of a double ended shear connector in accordance with the present invention welded in place in conjunction with a supporting member and concrete slab; Figure 2 is an elevational view of a double ended shear con- nector in accordance with the present invention; C " Figure 3 is a perspective view of a portion of the welding apparatus, shear connector and arc shields prior to weldi ' ng in accordance with the present invention; and Figure 4 is a perspective view of a portion of the welding apparatus and shear connector following welding thereof. Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention The foregoing detailed description of the studs, methods and apparatus for welding studs by the stud end welding technique wherein the studs have two or more ends to be simultaneously welded will be undertaken in respect to a double ended stud of the double ended shear connector type essentially as shown in Figures 1 and 2. However, it is to be understood that the present method and apparatus applies to and may be utilized in the welding of other configurations of studs as well as studs having more than two ends to be welded. A double ended stud of a configuration suitable for use as a double ended shear connector is shown in Figures 1 and 2 of the drawing. The double ended stud 10 is shown utilized as a shear connector and is shown in Figures 1 welded in place upon an I-beam 11. In use, the stud 10 is welded to the I-beam 11 directly upon the I-beam or, in some instances, through decking 12 which is utilized as the bottom form member and protection for a concrete slab to ultimately be poured upon and supported by the I-beam 11. A shear connector 10, welded in place, is shown partially embedded in a slab of concrete 13 as it would appear in actual use. The shear connector 10 provides an interconnection between the I-beam 11 and the slab 13 to resist shearing action of the concrete slab 13 in respect to the supporting beam 11 in a heretofore known manner. The details of the shear connector design of double ended stud of the present invention is shown in Figure 2 of the drawing. The shear connector stud 10 includes two weld ends 14 and 15. The ends 14 and 15 of the stud are disposed in a common plane. A portion 16 and 17 of the stud adjacent each end 14 and 15 thereof are formed straight. This straight portion is disposed generally perpendicular to the weld base upon which the stud is to be - ~~ * r (-:r ϊ ■ ...:-. ■ • . i welded and is necessary for cooperation with the configuration of the arc shields which are used in the process and which, will be described hereinafter. The remainder of the stud 18 disposed between the portion 15 and 17 may be of differing configurations from flat to U-shaped. In a preferred embodiment, the remaining portion is of a parabolic configuration. The parabolic configuration of the remaining portion 18 of the stud provides * for ready orientation of the stud in a stud welding chuck due to the noncircular configuration of the parabolic curve. Additionally, the parabolic configuration is of a lower profile than a circular configuration and results in a material savings of approximately 17% to 25% over a circular configuration of the same height without distracting from the shear strength capabilities of the stud. The cross section of the stud 10 may be of any desired con¬ figuration, i.e. round, elipticaT or rectangular. In a preferred embodiment, the stud is of rectangular configuration as shown in Figures 1 and 2 of the drawing. The weld ends 14 and 15 of the stud 10 are provided with elongate relatively thin projections or wires 19 extending perpendicularly from the weld face of the yiel d ends 14 and 15 and thus, extend per¬ pendicular to the weld base upon which the stud is to be welded. The projections or wires 19 may be formed of the parent metal of the stud during manufacture of the stud. Alternately, the projections or wires may be affixed to the stud by any suitable means such as staking or welding. The projec¬ tions or wires are preferably formed of a mild steel material such as the welding stud 10 itself. The number of projections or wires 19 required for each end of the welding stud 10 depends upon the cross sectional configuration of the stud welding end and the size thereof. For example, in a circular configuration of approximately _" in diameter, one welding projection 19 is sufficient. In a rectangular stud configuration of approximately 1/8 inch by _ inch, two welding projections per welding end of the stud are required. In a rectangular stud configuration of 1/8 inch by 2 inches, in width, at least three welding projections 19 are required. The length of the projections 19 depends again upon the con-- figuration and general weld area of the. end of the stud to Be welded. In smaller diameter or cross sectional area studs, a pro¬ jection of approximately 1/8 inch or greater is acceptable. In studs of larger cross sectional area, the length of the projections 19 will range up to approximately 3/4 inch. The cross sectional configuration of the projection 19 may Be of any desired configura¬ tion such as circular or rectangular. By way of example, the cross sectional configuration of a rectangular projection may be in the area of 3/16 inch square down to the range of approximately 1/16 inch square or the equivalent cross sectional area in a round cross sectional configuration. The welding gun apparatus including the stud chuck and the weld gun footpiece utilized in accordance with, the present invention are shown in Figures 3 and 4 of the drawing. The welding gun 20 utilized may be generally of the hand held type utilized for welding of con- ventional shear connectors. Such a welding gun includes two legs 21 extending from the welding gun and which provide the support for a footpiece 22. The footpiece 22 provides the support for two arc shields 23. The arc shields 23 have an internal configuration complementary to the configuration of the stud 10 to be welded. In the embodiment shown, the arc shields 23 are of a rectangular configuration. The arc shields 23 are designed to fit into receptacles 24 in the footpiece 22 in the manner shown in Figure 4 of the drawing. A relieved section 25 on the arc shields permits the upper portion 26 of the arc shield to fit into the receptacles 24 of the footpiece 22 with the lower portion of the arc shields projecting underneath the footpiece 22. In this manner, when the footpiece is* placed in welding position, the arc shields are held in place between the foot¬ piece and the workpiece as essentially shown in Figure 4 of the drawing. The welding gun chuck 27 of the apparatus of the present invention includes a backing plate 31 which- is secured at its, upper central portion to the gun extension rod 28 by- e ns, of a conven-r tional threaded arrangement. The ins.ide configuration of the backing plate 31 is of a configuration complementary to the outs.ide con- figuration of the upper portion of stud 10 to be utilized with the chuck. Two chuck jaws 29 are disposed on either side of the backing pla e 31, Either or both, of e chuck jaws rosy be secured to the backing plate 31 by means- of γieldable threaded fastener-spring arrangements 32. The width, of the backing plate 31 is- slightly less than the width, of the stud 10 to be utilized in the chuck. The yieldable spring-threaded fastener arrangements- 32 thus provide the yield of the chuck jaws 29 to permit snug fit of the stud 10 within the backing plate and chuck jaws.- hen placed in welding position. The stud 10 is loaded into the chuck assembly 27 upwardly through the opening in the footpiece and into the chuck assembly. The complementary configuration of the inner surface of the Backing plate 31 will permit proper alignment of the stud within the chuck and in respect to the weld base upon which the stud is to be welded in all cases where the stud 10 is not of a complete circular con¬ figuration. In the particular embodiment shown, the upper portion 18 of the stud 10 is of a parabolic configuration which provides for ready orientation of the stud ends 14 and 15 and projections 19 per¬ pendicular to the weld base and the extremities of the projectlons * 19 Being disposed in a plane parallel to the weld Base. An alignment pin 33 may also Be used to insure proper alignment of the stud 10 with respect to the workpiece. The alignment pin 33 is secured at its one end axially to the extension rod 28. The alignment pin 33 extends downwardly below the backing plate 31 and is adapted to cooperate with an alignment aperture 34 formed into the stud 10 as shown in Figures 2 and 3. The length of the alignment pin 33 is such that the lower end of the alignment pin 33 will mate with the aperture 34 in the stud as the stud is being inserted upwardly through the footpiece into the chuck 27. The welding gun 20 includes internal mechanism therein which permits the extension rod 28 to be secured in a retracted position O PΪ ' - prior to the initiation of the. stud welding cycle. The stud welding gun 20 further includes internal mechanism therein which will main¬ tain a constant pressure of approximately 10 pounds plunger pressure upon the chuck and the stud therein during the welding sequence and also controls the rate of plunge from between 1/4 inch to 3 inches per second which can be varied within the gun by the operator de¬ pending upon the particular configuration of stud being welded. Prior to welding, the stud 10 is inserted through the footpiece into the chuck 27. Thereafter, the extension rod is cocked into its elevated position. The arc shields 23 are positioned in place within the footpiece and the entire assembly is then placed in position for welding as shown in Figure 4 of the drawing. Upon initiation of the welding cycle, the elevated chuck and included stud are released and begin a downward descent toward the workpiece. Prior to contact of the projections 19 with the work- piece, the main controller for the power supply applies a potential across the stud and workpiece. Upon the projections reaching the workpiece, the first projec¬ tion to engage or contact the workpiece will experience a high current surge through that projection. The current density drawn from the welding power supply is selected for the particular pro¬ jection configuration being utilized to permit current density in the projection to be sufficiently high to cause disintegration or explosion of only a portion of the projection without destruction of the entire projection. This current density is significantly higher than that experienced in normal arc stud welding which essentially provides only an arc without particular disintegration of the end of the stud being welded. However, the weld current density is con¬ trolled at a level significantly below that of the capacitor discharge welding which essentially causes almost instantaneous destruction of the entire smaller welding tip associated with the conventional capa¬ citor discharge studs. By way of example, with a stud of an approximate 1/16 by 1/16 inch square projection cross section, the power supply may be set to deliver approximately 3,500 amps. Under this condition, the current • 3- density experienced i.n the projection on the stud will be in the order of 1,000,000 amps per square inch. This- is approximately 1/10 of the current density experienced in a typical capacitor discharge welding cycle but 20Q times* the current density experi- enced in a typical arc stud welding cycle. The sequence of events that occurs is that the first projection to touch the weld base disintegrates a portion of its.- tip and an arc is initiated to begin melting of the projection and the base material. The pressure being maintained upon the stud by the welding gun and the rate of descent of the welding gun are controlled, as- above stated, such that the loss * or shortening of the projection at which arcing is occurring will permit the next longest projection to come into contact with the base material. Upon the next projection contacting the base material, a short across * the existing arc between the first projection and the base material occurs. Upon the appearance of the short, the current will assume the path of least resistance thus- extinguishing the arc which has theretofore been generated. The current density then immediately builds up in the projection coming into contact with the base material with the consequent dis ntegration or explosion and resultant arc initiation at that projection. The sequence then repeats itself bringing another projection into dead short with the base material with the consequent disintegration of the projection and arc initia¬ tion. This procedure or process is * continuously repeated on a random basis back and forth between the various projections until the pro¬ jections are consumed. By the time the projections are consumed, the resultant arcs at the various projections will have caused sufficient melting of the stud and of the workpiece to provide pools of metal into which the stud is ultimately plunged. The control of the pressure upon the stud, the rate of plunge and the current density must be maintained all in proportion and ratio to one another and to the projection configuration to provide for arc switching frequency betv/een the projections at a high enough frequency to not permit cooling of the pools of metal formed at the projections at which an arc has been extinguished hefore an arc is reinstituted at that projection. All of these factors are matters, whi.ch. can be ascertained for given stud and welding projection configurations, The welding controller may be calibrated to time-out and dis¬ continue the welding current slightly Before, at or after the stud ends reach the. workpiece. In a preferred embodiment, the. weld current is maintained on after the stud reaches the workpiece for a slight duration of time, which procedure is known as a hot plunge, The welding time between the moment of contact of the projections of the stud and the discontinuance of welding current depends upon the length and cross * sectional area of the projections as well as. the current setting. By way of example, a projection of 1/8 inch in length and of approximately 1/16 inch square configuration results, in a welding cycle time of between ,2 to .3 seconds*. When a 3/4 inch length projection is utilized with a 1/16 inch square cross, sectional projection, the welding cycle is * from approximately .6 to .9 of a second. By way of comparison, the welding cycle time of conventional capacitor discharge welding is ,002 to .004 seconds while conventional arc stud welding is * .100 seconds or greater. In a preferred embodiment, a positive ground connection to the workpiece is preferred. Under these circumstances as above described, it is found that the base metal contributes to a major portion of the weld joint with a lesser portion of the weld fillet material Being formed from the stud. From the foregoing description of a preferred emBodiment of the douhle ended stud welding stud, apparatus and methods- in accordance with the present invention it wi.ll Be appreciated that the apparatus and method as well as the stud descriBed provide an effective and reliable method for effecting simultaneous welding of a stud haying two or more weld ends by the stud end welding technique. The descrip- tion of sepcific embodiments and parameters has- been made by way of illustration and not by way of limitation and the scope of the inven¬ tion i ' s to be interpreted in view of the following claims.

Claims: Claims 1. In the art of welding of a metallic stud, having a plurality pf ends, to another metallic base member, the method permitting simul¬ taneous welding of each end to the Base member by the stud end welding technique comprising: supporting each end of the metallic member above the base member by at least one elongated relatively thin metallic projection; and maintaining the current density in the projections during the welding cycle at sufficient density to disintegrate only a portion of each projection with consequent arc initiation upon contact with the base material whereby the consequent disintegration and arcing at a given projection will create metal melting and shortening of the projection permitting stud descent with consequent contact of a fur¬ ther projection resulting in shorting and extinguishment of the arc at the given projection and disintegration and arc establishment at the further projection on a continuing and random basis. 2. The method of Claim 1 further including the steps of advancing the stud toward the base material at a rate and maintaining a pressure upon the stud against the base member in relation to the current density to sustain an arc switching frequency between the projections sufficient to maintain molten metal at each stud end until stud end contact with the base material. 3. The method of Claim 2 further including the steps of: positioning the stud and projections out of contact with the base material at the initiation of the stud welding cycle and energizing the stud prior to contact of the projections with the base material. 4. The method of Claim 2 further including the step of: maintaining the stud energized through contact of the stud end with the base material. 5. In the art of stud welding of a metallic stud, having a Dlurality of ends, to another metallic base member, the improvements in the stud ϊr f- _ I U _ permitting simultaneous welding of each end of the stud to the. base member by the stud end welding technique comprising: at least one elongate relatively thin metallic projection ex- tending from each end of the stud to be welded, 6. The improvements in the stud of Claim 5 wherein the stud is a double ended stud and has both ends disposed in a common plane and wherein at least a portion of the stud is of non-circular configura¬ tion to permit stud alignment with a s ud chuck. 7. The improvements in the stud of Claim 6 wherein a portion of the stud is of parabolic configuration. 8. The improvements in the stud of Claim 5 wherein the stud is- of a double ended configuration and has both ends disposed in a common plane and further includes alignment means formed into the stud for alignment within a stud chuck. 9. The improvements in the stud of Claim 5 wherein the stud is a double ended stud and has. both ends disposed in a common plane and wherein a portion of each stud end immediately adjacent each end of the stud is straight and disposed perpendicular to the common plane, 10. In the art of stud welding by the end stud welding technique including a stud welding gun, a gun chuck for supporting the stud to be welded and a gun footpiece for securing arc shields * , the improve¬ ments in the gun chuck and gun footpiece permitting welding of a double ended stud having each end disposed in a common plane to a workpiece comprising: chuck alignment means associated with the gun chuck to align and maintain the stud ends in parallel relationship to the workpiece during the welding cycle. 11. The improvements of Claim 10 wherein the chuck alignment means includes a non-circular configuration within the gun chuck of com- *r*ϊ i ϊ~ϊτ- plementary configuration to the stud to be welded. 12. The improvements of Claim 10 wherein the chuck alignment -means,- includes an elongate pin adapted to cooperate with an aperture wtth.i . n the stud. 13. The improvements of Claim 10 wherein the gun footpiece includes means for securing an arc shield in alignment with each of the ends of the stud to be welded.

Inventors: DOYLE T, HAUSER D, HAYES M, MARTIN D
Applicants: OMARK INDUSTRIES INC, OMARK IND INC
Application year: 1980
Main classification: B23K9
IPC codes: B23K9