COKE QUENCHING AND HANDLING SYSTEM

Abstract: A system and method for handling and cooling a hot charge of metallurgical coke from a coke oven. The handling and cooling of hot coke pushed from a coke oven has resulted in significant pollution of the environment and loss of coke through exposure to the atmosphere. This invention obviates these problems by the provision of a low pollution, high yield system comprising a closed box (10) of a configuration substantially corresponding to that of a charge of coke (17) to be directly received thereby from a coke oven (12) through an openable end thereof sealingly engaged with the oven face (16), the coke charge (17) being thereafter enclosed and isolated from atmospheric oxygen and external cooling media. Provision is made for either passing a cooling medium over the exterior surfaces of the coke box (10), or passing circulating cooling gas through the box (10) through connections (28, 29). Provision is made for discharging the cooled coke from the coke box (10) by tilting on conveyor car (11). A preferred system includes a coke box (200) constructed of thin sheet metal panels (201) supported by, but not rigidly attached to, a support structure (204) and equipped with a cooling water reservoir/metering system (212) for cooling the exterior surfaces.

Description: COKE QUENCHING AND HANDLING SYSTEM TECHNICAL FIELD This invention relates to a system for receiving and cooling a charge from a coke oven in a manner which effec¬ tively eliminates the discharge of contaminants into the environment from the time the coke is pushed from the coke oven through the time the cooled coke is deposited for further processing and use, while at the same time increasing the quality and yield of the coke and facilitating the recovery of a significant portion of the sensible heat of the glowing coke. An increase in the output of high quality coke is advantageous for obvious reasons relating to the fundamental desire with most processes to increase their efficiency. More importantly, however, it is desirable to improve the quality of coke to permit an increase in the blast furnace efficiency and, consequently, an increase in the output of the steel plant. BACKGROUND ART In conventional coking operations, when a charge of coke is ready to be pushed, a door at each end of the coke oven is removed, a ram-type pusher is positioned at one end of the oven, a coke guide is positioned at the other end, and an open hopper car is positioned at the discharge of the coke guide. The pusher expels the glowing coke cake through the coke guide, from which it falls into the open hopper car, which may be moving slowly transversely to the coke discharge in an effort to distribute the coke more or less evenly along the length of the hopper car. The hopper car is then quickly transported to a quenching station where the coke is drenched with large quantities of water to lower its temperature below the kindling temperature. At least two separate phenomena relating to the yield of coke are associated with the pushing operation. First, the dropping of the coke as it is discharged from the oven and coke guide into the hopper car below breaks the semi-rigid OMPI cake of coke from its shape conforming to the interior of the oven into randomly sized lumps. Due to the nature of the blast furnace operation, chunks of coke smaller than a certain size are unacceptable. In the conventional process described above, however, a substantial portion of the coke degrades into unusable dust, known as "coke breeze", or into chunks smaller than the minimum acceptable size. Secondly, the glowing coke, once exposed to the atmos¬ phere, ignites and continues burning until the temperature of the coke is reduced to below its kindling temperature, as by quenching with large quantities of water. Depending on th relative locations of the coke oven and the quenching station a portion of the coke can be consumed prior to its being quenched. In addition, the quenching operation itself causes the coke to break up, further degrading it. Accordingly, with the cumulative losses of- usable coke through breakage, through literally burning the coke away during the oven-to-quench station transport operation, and further degradation upon water quenching, the net coke output can be substantially less than the gross amount actually discharged from the oven. Further disadvantages are associated with conventional coke oven operation with water quenching. For instance, the heating value of water-quenched coke is generally lower than coke which has undergone a so-called dry quench. Known dry quench systems, discussed below, typically employ an inert gas passed through the coke to absorb the sensible heat and, accordingly, do not involve the contact of water with the coke. The lower heating value of water-quenched coke stems from the residual moisture content of the coke which results despite attempts to meter the amount of quench water to supply only as much as will be evaporated during the quench¬ ing process. The difficulties in accurately metering the water result from such variables as the nonuniform applica¬ tion of the. ater to the coke, ' the uneven distribution of the coke within a hopper car, charge-to-charge variations in the coke yield, etc. OMPΓ Additionally, with economy in energy consumption becoming increasingly important, employing the high heat content of a charge of coke to simply boil and evaporate away quench water is a relatively ineffective use of significant amounts of heat which might more effectively be utilized through a heat re¬ covery system. Considering a separate but related and important aspect of coking operations-, such operations are notorious for the environmental pollution they generate. Conventional operations employing a water quench technique produce relatively high levels of pollution during the pushing and quenching operations described above. During pushing, the cascading of the coke into the hopper cars creates considerable dust simply from the impact. Coupled with the continual emission of volatiles along with the smoke from the burning which occurs, and the particulate-laden steam generated from any on-site water spraying, considerable par- ticulate matter is released to the atmosphere. Subsequently, in the water quenching operation, large quantities of par¬ ticulate-laden steam are generated. The problem is even more acute where recycled cooling water, already having a high particulate content, is used. In order to reduce the discharge of contaminants during pushing, hoods of various types ranging from those which enclose only the coke guide and the hopper car, or a portion of it, as it is positioned in front of a particular oven, to types which enclose the entire discharge side of the coke oven battery have been suggested to reduce the discharge of con¬ taminants during the pushing operation. It will be appreciated that this latter approach involves high capital operating maintenance and repair costs. Insofar as the quenching opera¬ tion is concerned, several hood and tower arrangements have also been suggested for use with the conventional process described of transporting the coke in hopper cars to a water quenching station. Efforts to reduce the pulverization upon impact and/or to ameliorate the pollution resulting from the pushing and quench¬ ing operations have resulted in some coke handling techniques which depart from the conventional systems described above. 0 For example, systems are known which involve pushing the coke cake into a perforate box which is then water quenched. Such an arrangement has the disadvantage of exposing at the glowin coke to the atmosphere and, of course, quenching water. Further modifications to systems employing perforate coke box described above include the placing of hoods over the coke boxes themselves--to contain the emissions. While some of the perforate coke box-type systems des¬ cribed offer some advantages over the conventional process described above, among the remaining disadvantages are the generation of pollutants (even though contained), inefficient dissipation of the sensible heat of the coke and the intro- ' duction of undesirable moisture content through water quenchi Another alternative approach offering increased efficien of the coking operation and pollution reduction is the dry quenching system mentioned above. In such a system, instead quenching with water, an inert, i.e., oxygen-free, gas is passed through the coke. The sensible heat absorbed by the inert gas may then be recovered, as in boilers, with the iner gas being continuously cleaned and recycled. With such a system, high quality, dry coke is produced. British Patent 183,113 (1923) discloses such a system. Some subsequently disclosed dry quench systems employ covered buckets to trans¬ port the coke from the point of coke oven discharge to a larg blast furnace-type hopper to contain the coke ' while the inert gas is passed through it. While, as noted even in the Britis patent, the latter approach involves the double handling of t coke, it offers the advantage of reduced pollution during the transporting as well as the dry quenching operation. Known dry quenching systems are subject to some offsetti disadvantages, however, including the pulverization problem discussed above and the often large capital expenditures required for a blast-furnace type of heat recovery system and/or for modifications required to retrofit existing coking operations. An object of the present invention is to provide a syste for receiving and cooling a charge from a coke oven which virtually eliminates the discharge of contaminents into the environment from the time the coke is pushed from the coke ov through the time the cooled coke is deposited for further processing and use, while at the same time increasing the quality and yield of the coke and facilitating the recovery of a significant portion of the sensible heat of the glowing coke. Even in instances where provision is not made to recover the heat, the initial stage of a slow cooling process provides further opportunity to cure the coke while at the same time permitting the removal of additional coke oven by-products. A further object is to provide a system of the type described above and offering the advantages set forth which may be economically employed in both existing and newly constructed coking facilities. A more specific object is to provide a system of the type described above which allows a large amount of coke to be undergoing various phases of cooling such that the heat exchange process may be efficiently carried to near equilibrium. Yet another object is to provide a system as set forth above which may be adapted to a variety of dry quenching techniques. Still another object is to provide a system of the above type which accommodates considerable latitude in the location of the cooling area relative to the coke oven battery. These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings, in which: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a perspective- iew illustrating a portion of the discharge side of a coke oven battery with a carrier vehicle and coke box of the present invention having the same general configuration as the oven interior positioned alongside; FIG. 2 is a perspective view similar to FIG. 1 showing the coke box rotated into alignment with a coke oven; FIG. 3 is a view similar to those in FIGS. 1 and 2 showing the coke box held against the coke oven and receiving a charge of coke; FIG. 4 is a perspective view showing the coke box trans¬ ferred onto a dock for dry quenching the coke; FIG. 5 is a perspective view showing the coke box on the carrier vehicle and in the dump position to empty a load of cooled coke for further processing and use; FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an alternative embodimen of the invention in which a stationary cooling box is provide at the discharge of each coke ■ oven and carrier vehicles. are used to transport.the cooled coke to the next station for further processing and use. FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a specific embodiment of a coke box of the present invention; FIG. 8 is a sectional view taken through the plane 8-8 o the coke box of FIG. 7; FIG. 9 is a sectional view taken through the plane 9-9 o the coke box of FIG. 7; and FIG. 10 is a sectional view taken through the plane 10-1 of the coke box of FIG. 7. DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION Inasmuch as this specification is directed to an overall system for coke receiving and cooling encompassing a wide variety of specific embodiments, the figures contain diagramm tic representations of apparatus intended to assist in readil understanding the invention through the medium of a simple, y functional, first embodiment particularly suited for use with existing coke oven batteries and an alternative embodiment which may or may not be suitable for retrofitting existing coking facilities. Finally, the best mode contemplated for a coke box of the invention is illustrated and described. Turning to Figures 1-4, there are shown perspective view illustrating a preferred embodiment of the invention comprisi a coke box 10 and carrier vehicle 11 which are employed to¬ gether to receive a charge from one of a battery of coke oven 12 and transport the sealed coke box to an area (Fig. 4) for cooling of the glowing coke by any of a variety of dry quench systems. By way of example, alternatives for cooling the cok within the box include (1) passing inert gas (e.g. by-product nitrogen from an air separation plant for a basic oxygen furnace), (2) spraying the exterior of the box with cooling water, (3) air cooling the exterior of the box and (4) im¬ mersing the box in water. The first mentioned of the alter¬ natives is particularly suited for heat recovery, as by passing the heated nitrogen through boilers, the energy from which may then be effectively employed. In addition, some of the dry quenching systems may be adapted for the simultaneous removal of additional coke oven by-products. While some dry quenching systems are particularly advantageous for specific applications, many advantages of the present invention are independent of the particular quenching system employed. Accordingly, the speci¬ fics of the particular types of dry quenching systems are discussed only insofar as they have a direct bearing on the coke box details and configuration. ' Describing the fundamental operation of the system of the present invention, a plurality of relatively inexpensive coke boxes 10 are employed to receive cakes of coke directly from a coke oven. The volume of the coke box is slightly greater than that of the charge of coke to be received to minimize void space within the box which might tend to reduce the efficiency of indirect cooling, and to maintain the integrity of the coke cake to as great an extent as possible. In this regard, in the preferred embodiment illustrated, the interior length, width and height of the coke box 10 are each slightly greater than the corresponding dimensions of the coke oven. This arrange¬ ment offers several advantages. First, the coke cake 17 (Fig. 3) may be slid from the coke oven into the box without signifi¬ cant change in configuration, thereby minimizing the pulveri¬ zation which might otherwise occur by allowing the coke to fall into a lower level chamber such as a hopper car or bucket. By maintaining the coke in essentially its undisturbed cake form during the slow cooling process it is contemplated that the strength of the coke will be enhanced to result in improved performance in the blast furnace, where the structural integrity of the coke affects the overall blast furnace operation. Finally, the large surface area and the thin, rectangular configuration of the coke as it is processed within the coke oven is conducive to efficient indirect cooling throught the coke box surfaces. In order to isolate the coke from atmospheric oxygen, the ITU REA^ ' door 13 on one end 15 which may be opened to accept a charge coke. The end 15 of the box 10 can be designed to create a substantially sealed relationship with the discharge face 16 the coke oven to prevent the escape of particulate matter and volatile gases during pushing. In the case of boxes designed for dry quenching with an inert gas passed..through the coke within the box, a gas inlet and an outlet (not shown) may be provided with suitable pro- vision for.readily attaching and detaching the inert gas supp and return ducts (Fig. 4, items 29 and 30). The openings should be able to be closed during the coke loading, trans¬ porting and unloading operations and able to be selectively opened when connecting the box for the heat exchange operatio It is contemplated that the box 10 be constructed of ste plates able to withstand the high temperature of the coke (approx. 2000°F). In view of the wide temperature range to which the box will be exposed, its surfaces should be permitt to undergo the required thermally-induced expansion and con¬ traction without excessive buckling or distortion. In somewhat of a departure from the philosophy taken by some capital equipment purchasers and manufacturers, it is contemplated that the coke boxes be relatively simple and inexpensive—designed to perform the basic functions of re¬ ceiving, transporting and holding the coke for cooling. By minimizing the unit cost, it is contemplated that a relativel large number of the boxes can be economically employed. As discussed below, by having a series of boxes at various stage of cooling, the lengthy, relative to an almost instantaneous water quench, dry cooling process can be carried on at a rate conductive to recovering a maximum amount of the sensible hea and/or removing additional coke by-products while maintaining an economical operation. Referring now to Figs. 1-3, in the embodiment illustrate a specially designed carrier vehicle 11 is employed to hold t coke box 10 in position to permit loading of the coke and to carry the coke box to and from the cooling area. The particu lar embodiment of carrier vehicle 11 shown is designed to tak into consideration the limited manuvering space and, particu¬ larly, the limited dimension A (Fig. 1) available in many IfUR existing coking facilities. Accordingly, while more manuvering space might permit a carrier vehicle having a conventional truck configuration to simply back up to the discharge end of a coke oven, the carrier vehicle 11 shown in the illustrated embodiment has a rotatable platform 18 upon v/hich the coke box 10 rests. The normal direction of travel of the vehicle is transverse to the.coke ovens, as represented by the arrow B in Fig. 2. In the carrying mode, the platform 18 is aligned with the central line of the vehicle. The platform illustrated is turrent-mounted for rotation about the axis 19 to align the coke box with a coke oven {Fig. 2). Further, the vehicle itself has a 90° steering capability (as shown by way the dotted position of the wheel -20 in Fig. 1) to maximize manuvera- bility. As an additional feature, either the coke box 10 or the platform 18 are provided with means, rollers 21 on the coke box 10 in the embodiment shown, to permit the coke box to be readily rolled back and forth while on the platform to permit adjustments in its position, as well as onto and from the platform for the cooling operation discussed below. Turning again to Figs. 1-3, which illustrate the coke box 10 and carrier vehicle 11 at various stages in its operation in preparation for receiving a charge of coke 17 into a coke box 10, the doors 23 at each end of the coke oven to be pushed are shown removed, as by conventional door machines (not shown). The carrier vehicle 11, with the coke box 10 centered over the platform pivot 19, is driven into a position with the platform . pivot aligned with the coke oven and spaced from the coke oven buckstays 22 by a distance slightly greater than the effective radius r of the portion of the platform 18 to be swung into proximity with the coke oven (Fig. 1). The platform 18 is then rotated 90° into alignment with the coke oven, as illustrated in Fig. 2. The coke box is then advanced to create a substan¬ tially sealed relationship with the coke oven discharge face 16 (Fig. 3). At this point the door 14 (shown closed in Figs. 1 and 2) is opened. It is noted that in the embodiment shown, the operator's cab 25 is located near the receiving end of the coke box 10. This arrangement provides for optimum visibility during the coke box positioning operations. ■ BTJ E^HΓ The coke cake 17 is then pushed with a ram 24 into the coke box 10 and, once it is completely within the box, the co box door 14 is closed. The coke box 10 is next retracted on the platform 18 to clear the buckstays 22 (the position shown in Fig. 2), at which point the platform may be rotated back into the normal carrying position (Fig. 1) and the vehicle 11 driven to a coke. . box cooling area such as shown in Fig. 4. As noted above, a variety of dry quenching techniques ma be employed to cool the coke. In view of the considerable disparity between the coke oven pushing intervals (typically few minutes), on the one hand , and the period required for th coke to cool to below its kindling temperature (on the order two or more hours) , on the other hand, it is apparent that a plurality of coke boxes will be required in steady state, efficient operation. The speed with which the maneuvering an loading of the carrier vehicle 11 and coke box 10 can be accomplished, however, permits the use of only a relatively small number of vehicles to service a coking facility having large number of ovens. Accordingly, in operation a vehicle 1 will carry a coke box 10 to the heat exchange area, deposit t coke box there, pick up a coke box containing cooled coke, unload the cooled coke from the box and return with the empty box to the site of the next coke oven to be pushed. The relative time intervals involved will determine the ratio of vehicles, boxes, and ovens. Removal of a coke box 10 from and replacement onto a carrier vehicle 11 at the cooling site may be accomplished by any of a variety of means, including simply rolling it betwee the carrier vehicle and an elevated dock or handling it with overhead lifting means. The former type of arrangement is shown in Fig. 4. In that illustration the carrier vehicle 11 is shown pulled up to a dock 26 onto which the coke box 10 ha been rolled. Alternative cooling means including inert gas inlet and outlet ducts 28 and 29 and spray nozzles 30 are sho to illustrate how the cooling of the coke can be accomplished. Fig. 5 illustrates a carrier vehicle 11 in a dump positi which inclines the coke box 10 at a sufficient angle to cause the coke cake 17 to slide out the open end of the box. As illustrated by phantom lines in Fig. 5, by providing a coke breaking and screening house 31 with an opening to match that of the coke box, the cooled coke may be smoothly discharged, again without subjecting the coke to an uncontrolled free fall which might pulverize it and without releasing contaminants to the atmosphere. An alternative embodiment " of the invention is illustrated in Fig. 6. In this embodiment, a coke box 100, stationary, but otherwise of the general type described above, is mounted at the discharge end of each coke oven 101. When a coke oven 101 is ready for the pushing operation, a door (not shown) between the coke oven and the coke box 100 is opened, and the coke cake 102 is pushed into the coke box. The coke box already contains a coke cake 103 which has been cooling since the last time the particular oven was pushed. With door 104 open, the cooled coke cake 103 is pushed into a transfer box 105 on a waiting carrier vehicle 106. The cooled coke may then be transported to an area for further processing and use, as to a coke breaking and screening house of the type shown in Fig. 5 (item 31). By way of illustration of the type of dry quenching which might be employed, inlet and outlet cooling duct manifolds 108 and 109 are shown connected to the series of cooling boxes 100. Where retrofitting of an existing coking facility with this embodi¬ ment is possible, or in the case of newly constructed coke oven batteries, the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 6 offers the advantages of extended cooling periods (the same as for the coal-to-coke process) and reduced handling of the coke, in¬ cluding elimination of the need to transport hot coke from immediately adjacent the coke oven discharge. The above description has explained the overall operation and configuration of the components of a coke handling system according to the invention. Beyond the information set forth above, there are several features which might readily be incorporated into preferred embodiments. For example, a cooling system incorporated directly into the carrier vehicle 11 in the embodiments of Figs. 1-3 coul be employed to keep the coke box 10 cool from the time the coke oven is pushed and during transfer. Further, pressure and/or vacuum relief valves can be employed to limit or maintain pressure differentials between the interior and exterior of the coke box during the coke " B JREXCT BEST MODE OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Figs. 7-10 illustrate a specific embodiment of a coke bo 200 designed to receive coke directly from a coke oven in the manner described above in connection with Figs. 1-3. This co box design lends itself to relatively inexpensive yet highly effective fabrication techniques. Sheet metal panels 201 for a coke receiving chamber 202. This coke receiving chamber 20 has a cross section, overall shape, volume and surface area substantially equal to the configuration of the coke within coke oven. The receiving chamber 202 is closed and substan¬ tially airtight except for the end through which the coke enters as it is pushed from the oven', as illustrated in Fig. A sliding door 203 is illustrated to close and seal the re¬ ceiving chamber 202 once the coke has been pushed inside (the phantom outline 203* shows the door 203 in the open position) It may be desirable to make the coke receiving chamber 202 slightly longer than the coke oven chamber to compensate for any crumbling of the leading edge of the coke cake as it emerges from the oven and enters the box. Such crumbling would, in the case of a coke box having a receiving chamber length corresponding exactly to that of the original coke cak necessitate compression of the coke at the final stages of it entry into the receiving chamber. It is contemplated that in the embodiment shown, the panels 201 which make up the receiving chamber 202 be of minimum thickness, e.g., as little as 1/8 of an inch. An • external support structure 204 is shown spaced from the sides and bottom of the receiving chamber 202 by standoff posts 205 to provide the necessary support for the panels 201 without rigid or permanent interconnection therewith. The fabricatio of the chamber 202 of such thin material offers several significant advantages. For example, with the receiving chamber closed and substantially air tight, the panels 201 can flex in response to pressure changes within the box durin the cooling process. When adequately cured coke is pushed in and sealed within the receiving chamber, the subsequent cooli may result in sub-atmospheric pressure within the receiving chamber.. The pressure differential acting on the opposite ry O sides of on the panels will cause the panels to flex inwardly, tending not only to equalize the pressure but also reducing any spacing between the coke and the receiving chamber panels to further enhance the indirect cooling discussed below. On the other hand, in the event of pressure buildup within the receiving chamber, as might result from gaseous by¬ products evolving-from inadequately cured, or "green", coke within the receiving chamber, the thin panels can expand outwardly to at least partially relieve the pressure without the release of the by-products into the atmosphere, under these circumstances, some outward flexing may also be provided by the upright members of the support structure 204. The thin-walled "floating" arrangement of the panels 202 within the support structure 204 also accommodates any ther¬ mally induced expansion of the receiving chamber walls, '•' : especially important should the cooling of the receiving chamber not begun promptly at the time the coke is pushed into it. Also, by not permanently fixing the receiving chamber 202 to the support structure 204, replacement of the former to take advantage of the probably longer useful life of the support structure is facilitated. Finally, the employment of the standoffs 205 accommodates the substantially unrestricted circulation of whatever external cooling medium is employed. A combination reinforcement and door sealing arrangement for the receiving chamber side of the door 203 is shown in cross section in Fig. 8. In this embodiment, a C-shaped channel 206 is welded to the receiving chamber panels 201 immediately adjacent the path of the sliding door 203. This arrangement not only provides structural support, but, in addition, the chamber formed by the receiving chamber panels 201 and the channel 206 can serve to form a water jacket for a door seal which might otherwise be unsuitable for use in the high temperature environment immediately adjacent the receiving chamber panels 201. Such an arrangement is shown for the purposes of illustration in Fig. 8 as a resilient, e.g., rubber, seal 208 housed in channel 209 and isolated from direct exposure to the door 203 and hot coke with a metallic leaf 210. Direct contact between the coke box 200 and the face of the coke oven is facilitated by an integral coke guide porj 211 extending beyond the door 203 for a distance sufficient t provide clearance for the door and operating mechanism (not shown) without interference with any structure projecting beyond the face of the coke oven, e.g., buckstays 22 as shown in Figs. 1-3. This coke guide portion 211 may be minimized o even eliminated where the door and operating mechanism and/or the oven face structure permits. For the sake of clarity, no specific reinforcement of the coke guide or further structura support and interconnection with the receiving chamber is illustrated, though it is contemplated that any required coul be of the type illustrated above in connection with the re¬ ceiving chamber." In the embodiment shown, as suggested above, the coke receiving chamber 202 may be cooled even while in position at the coke oven face through an integral cooling water reservoi metering system. Referring to Fig. 9, plates 212 welded at spaced intervals around the upper periphery of the side panel 201 of the receiving chamber 202 serve as dams. The inter¬ mittent welding leaves passages 213 through which water above the dams may pass for cooling the side panels 201 of the receiving chamber 202. By extending upward beyond the top surface of the receiving chamber 202 to define a reservoir, water from a source (not shown) may be supplied at such a rat as to maintain a pre-deter ined head of water above the pas¬ sages 213 to not only cool the top surface of-the receiving chamber 202, but to maintain a relatively uniform flow of wat through the passages. One skilled in the art will recognize that such a reservoir could also serve as the supply for a water-jacketed sealing arrangement of the type shown in Fig. and described above. Referring to Fig. 10, the lower portion of the support structure 204 may be made watertight such that the cooling water may be collected at the lower surface of the receiving chamber 202 in a reservoir (the surface of which is represent by phantom line 214) to maintain the bottom surface of the chamber immersed for the cooling thereof. Also, as illustrated in Figs. 7 and 10, wheels 215 may b mounted to the support structure 204 to facilitate the fUR ^ positioning of the coke box 200 as discussed above in connec¬ tion with Figs. 1-3. INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY It is contemplated that the present invention may be • employed in a wide variety of coke oven operations to reduce pollutants while at the same time resulting in a high yield of high quality coke. The invention is susceptible of a variety of coke box handling techniques to accommodate the layouts of existing coke oven operations.

Claims: -16- I claim : 1. A coke box for dry quenching a charge of coke from coke oven comprising: (a) a receiving chamber formed of sheet metal panels an having a cross section, volume and surface area substantially equal to that of. a charge of coke, the receving chamber being closed except for * one open end; (b) means for selectively closing the open end of the receiving chamber for enclosing the coke within the coke box substantially isolate the coke from atmospheric oxygen and external cooling media; and (c) means for distributing cooling media over the sur¬ faces of the receiving chamber for indirectly cooling an enclosed charge of coke through the surfaces of the receiving chamber. 2. A coke box according to claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the sheet metal panels of said receiving chamber i thin enough to permit deflection in response to pressure differentials on opposite sides of the panel. 3. A coke box according to claim 2 further comprising external support structure and means for spacing the support structure from the sheet metal panels of the receiving chambe to provide support for the panels without rigid interconnecti therewith. —4. - A coke box according to claim 1, the means for distributing water over the surfaces of the receiving chamber comprising plates intermittently attached around the upper periphery of the receiving chamber, the plates extending upwardly beyond the top surface of the receiving chamber to define a reservoir for cooling water, the intermittent attach ment of the plates to the receiving chamber sides forming passages through which water may pass from the reservoir onto the surfaces of the receiving chamber. O 5. A coke box according to claim 1 further comprising an integral coke guide to create an effective seal between the coke oven face and the coke box and to guide the coke from the the coke oven into the coke receiving chamber. 6. A method for dry quenching a charge of coke from a coke oven comprising: a) aligning' the open end of an otherwise closed coke box having a cross section, volume and surface area substantially equal to that of the charge of coke with the discharge end of a coke oven; b) creating an effective seal between the coke oven face and the coke box to minimize the escape of coke and air contam¬ inants during the coke discharging operation; c) pushing the charge of coke from within the coke oven directly into the coke box through the open end while main¬ taining the coke in a form with substantially the same cross section and surface area as it had within the coke oven; d) enclosing the coke within the coke box while the coke box is in position at the discharge end of the coke oven to substantially isolate the coke from atmospheric oxygen and external cooling media; e) indirectly cooling the coke within the coke box to below its kindling temperature by passing a cooling medium over the exterior surfaces of the coke box; and f) discharging the cooled coke from the coke box. 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the cooling medium is water. 8. A method for dry quenching a charge of coke from a coke oven comprising: a) aligning the open end of an otherwise closed coke box having a cross section, volume and surface area substantially equal to that of the charge of coke with the discharge end of a coke oven; " BUREAU -18- ' ~ ~ b) creating an effective seal between the coke oven fac and the coke box to minimize the escape of coke and air con¬ taminants during the coke discharging operation; c) pushing the charge of coke from within the coke oven directly into the coke box through the open end while main¬ taining the coke in a form with substantially the same cross section and surface area as it had within the coke oven; d) enclosing the coke within the coke box while the cok box is in position at the discharge end of the*coke oven to substantially isolate the coke from atmospheric oxygen and external cooling media; e) employing a pressure differential between the interi and the exterior of the coke box to deflect at least a portio of the coke box inwardly toward the coke;. f) indirectly cooling the coke within the coke box to below its kindling temperature by passing a cooling medium ov the exterior surfaces of the coke box; and g) discharging the cooled coke from the coke box. 9. A method for dry quenching a charge of coke from a coke oven comprising: a) aligning an open end of a coke box having a volume substantially equal " to that of a charge of coke to be receive with the discharge end of a coke oven; b) pushing the charge of coke from within the oven directly into the coke box through the open end; c) enclosing the coke within the coke box to substantia isolate the coke from atmospheric oxygen and external cooling media; d) cooling the coke within the coke box to below its kindling temperature by a dry quenching technique; e) opening both the end of the coke box aligned with th discharge end of the coke oven and the other end of the coke box; and f) discharging the cooled coke from the coke box by pushing a second charge of coke into the coke box to force th first cooled, charge of coke out of the box. O 10. Apparatus for dry quenching a charge of coke from a coke oven comprising: a) a coke cooling box having interior dimensions sub¬ stantially equal to the interior dimensions of the coke oven, the cooling box being closed except for closeable doors at each end of the box to permit a coke cake to pass into and from the cooling box, the cooling box being positioned at the discharge end of the coke oven, the cooling box being adapted to effec¬ tively seal the discharge end of the oven to minimize the escape of coke and of contaminants into the atmosphere as. the coke is pushed into the cooling box; b) a transfer box having interior dimensions substantially equal to the interior dimensions of the oven and the coke cooling box to receive a charge of cooled coke from the coke cooling box; and c) means for transporting the transfer- box to and from a station for further processing and use.

Inventors: KRESS E
Applicants: KRESS E
Application year: 1980
Main classification: C10B39
IPC codes: C10B39