CONTROLLED RELEASE OF TRACE NUTRIENTS

Abstract: Compositions of and a method for preparing polymeric formulations that gradually, continuously and uniformly release various compounds over a long period of time in ionic form that are well recognized as essential to the growth of agricultural commodities. The compounds, such as inorganic salts of varying water solubilities, are monolithically incorporated into a thermoplastic matrix containing porosigens to regulate the release rate. Said porosigens can be the low or moderate soluble salts such as the carbonate, bicarbonates, sulfates, phosphates, nitrates, etc.; of the alkali metals, the alkaline earths or ammonium. Upon exposure to moisture, water ingress into the dispensing pellet removes said porosigen through dissolution processes thus creating a porous network permitting water contact with the incorporated nutrient molecules and their gradual egress in said water over a period of time such as for about a couple of months to four years, or longer.

Description: CONTROLLED RELEASE OF TRACE NUTRIENTS Technical Field This invention relates to the slow release from a plastic matrix of trace elements that are essential to plant growth. - UREAU OMPI CROSS-REFERENCE This application is a continuation-in-part of my copending application entitled "FLOATING CHIP DISPENSER" filed on February 22, 1979 as U. S. Serial No. 14,118, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of my earlier copending application entitled "A METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR THE LONG TERM CONTROLLED RELEASE OF A NON-PERSISTENT ORGANOTIN PESTICIDE FROM AN INERT MONOLITHIC THERMOPLASTIC DISPENSER" filed on January 22, 1979 as U. S. Serial No. 5,174, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of my appli¬ cation bearing the same title which was filed on June 19, 1978 as U. S. Serial No. 916,570, now U. S. Patent No. 4,116,111. BACKGROUND ART The present invention relates to the in- corporation of the soluble or sparingly soluble com¬ pounds of various elements recognized as essential to plant health and growth in a modified thermoplastic dispensing pellet, powder, granule, or other con¬ venient dispensing form. Such compounds are salts or oxides of well recognized trace elements vital to plant nutrition. Said salts or oxides upon contact with water release zinc, iron, copper, boron, manga¬ nese, molybdenum, magnesium, cobalt, and selenium in an ionic form as a water solution. Said plants, through natural processes, absorb the trace nutrient during uptake of the nutrient enriched water. Re- lease, being largely moisture dependent, is self- regulatory. During the growing season, wherein soil moisture is readily available, trace nutrient release is continuous and uniform. When moisture is not present, the. plants generally do not grow and said nutrients are not released, thus avoiding loss of nutrient. Heretofore, agronomists and nutritionists have recognized the vital and essential function of various elements needed in minute quantities by growing plants. Such elements have been termed "trace nutrients." Their functions vary, some being essential to the photosynthetic process or being a critical component in various enzyme systems. In general, the complete lack of a given trace element precludes plant growth. For instance, Western Australia would not support agricultural field crops prior to the introduction of zinc into the soil. In most instances where trace nutrients are utilized, the normal soil content is too low for proper nutri¬ tion and plants cultivated in said soils are gener¬ ally more susceptible to disease, show poor growth characteristics and consequently crop yields are low. It is common practice to supplement trace element poor soils by adding the needful material directly or as an additive in bulk nutrient applica¬ tions containing those substances classified as "fertilizers", i.e., nitrogen, potassium and phos¬ phorus. Most agricultural commodities require trace element soil supplement for optimum growth and thus maximum yield. Such agricultural commodities include field crops such as wheat, alfalfa, potatoes, clover, tobacco, pineapple, soy beans, sugar, beets, cotton, corn, barley, oats, rice, and the like; citrus fruits nuts, such as pecans peanuts, coffee, cocoa, walnut, almond; fruits such-as apples, pears, cherries, plums peaches; vegetables, such as beans, peas, cauliflower carrots, lettuce, tomatoes, cabbage, and the like; and, forestry commodities such as pine trees, and pasture grasses. In the latter case, elements es¬ sential to animal growth such as zinc, iron, copper and selenium are ingested by domestic animals con¬ suming said pasture grasses as forage. Lack of trace amounts of critical elements in the cow, sheep, goat and swine lead to-deficiency diseases and thus de¬ creased output of meat, milk and wool. It is probable that lack of application of trace nutrients in U. S. agricultural activities could lead to substantial declines in food production It is also likely that proper use of trace elements in soils lacking adequate quantities of said mater¬ ials, such as in vast reaches of Africa, would lead to a dramatic increase in agricultural productivity. Heretofore, in a typical utilization system relatively high dosages of trace nutrients are added periodically to the soil. A number of disadvantages, ameliorated by this invention, occur. Said nutrients are of necessity water soluble salts or oxides else the treated plant cannot absorb them. Being water soluble, a large proportion of material applied, - J ZE c:.. perhaps 80 percent or more, is lost from the root zone via natural processes such as percolation in the vertical direction to earth strata below the effec¬ tive range of the root structure or washed beyond said root range through the movement of ground waters in the horizontal direction. In addition, the type of soil plays a profound role in the trace nutrient contact and ingestion processes. Alkaline soils and/or clay type soils generally complex the added nutrient chemical thus creating insoluble ligands of no value to the nutrient deficient plant. The rate of soil intervention in the nutrition process varies with pH and type, but is an extremely important negative factor. Relatively massive amounts of the trace elements must thus be applied to overcome natural loss processes and mechanisms. This leads to two distinct and severe disadvantages. In general, treatment must be afforded before each growing season and sometimes followed by one or more retreatments during that season. It is unusual for one treatment to last over any great length of time and consequent¬ ly, effort is expended and chemicals are purchased repeatedly by the agriculturist at frequent intervals with a concommitant economic factor increasing the cost of foodstuff production. Probably of even great¬ er significance is that massive treatment early in the season leads to luxurious consumption (i.e., consumption beyond real plant needs) early in the growing season with rapidly depleting chemical availa- c:ι?ι bility during the middle and late growing season. I is generally recognized that the uniform availabilit of the trace nutrient in appropriate day-by-day quantities optimizes yield. The use of controlled-release trace nutrie of the present invention will overcome the luxury consumption, inadequate consumption cycle thus givin greater crop yield, will reduce the total amount of trace nutrient needed, and will also greatly extend between treatment times, from one to two, three, or more years, possibly five or ten years, depending on agricultural practices and natural circumstances (crop rotation and so on) . It is well known that biocidal materials can be incorporated in a polymeric matrix and caused to release at a rate efficacious with pest destruc¬ tion. U. S. Patent No. 3,417,181 teaches that organ tin toxicants can be dissolved in an elastomer-type matrix and caused to release through a diffusion- dissolution mechanism when exposed to water. The crux of this seminal invention was keyed to the necessity of the agent being soluble in the polymer. Similarly, U. S. Patents 3,590,119; 3,426,473; 3,851,053; and 3,639,583 extend the scope of the art to embrace new formulations encompassing different elastomers, specific release regulants that effect the diffusion path length and the like, but again th key concept is the necessity of agent solubility in the elastomer. Agents incorporated are organic pesticides and the generic matrix type is elastomers such as natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, and the like. In contrast, U. S. Patent No. 4,012,221 teaches that inorganic copper salts capable of being released into water are incorporated in a moderately crosslinked elastomer in which the _copper salts are insoluble. It is well known to the compounding art that agents not soluble within a polymeric matrix will not move at an efficacious rate through said matrix to said matrix surface and thus enter the ambient environment. Almost all organic pesticidal agents lack solubility in thermoplastic matrixes. Similarly, inorganic pesticidal agents are likewise insoluble in known thermoplastic or thermosetting polymers. One method of causing an insoluble organic agent to emit from a plastic dispensing unit is to use a third phase material that is (1) soluble in some extent in said plastic and (2) will carry said organic agent in solution or serve as a migratory pathway for said agent to reach the surface of said dispenser. It is, of course, recognized that the incorporated agent must reach the plastic/external environment interface to have any effect on organisms inhibiting the external environment. UJ S. Patents 2,956,073 and 3,116,201 describe the use of plasti- cizers as carrier elements. In an improvement on such patents, U. S. Patents 3,705,938 and 3,864,468 teach that surface loss from a plasticized matrix is subject to control through the use of a regulating membrane at said surface. The controlled-release art has been gener¬ ally confined to the incorporation and release of insecticides, bactericides, molluscicides and other toxic materials of an organic nature from an elasto- mer, wherein solubility is essential or a plastic, wherein an additive carrier material is critical. Microencapsulation processes wherein an inner core of the toxic agent is surrounded by a polymeric matri is well known to the pest control art. In general, release is effected by the rupture of the enveloping membrane and/or the passage of water through the porous membrane structure, said water path serving as a means of egress for said pesticide which reaches in this manner the external environment. Little work has been hitherto performed in development of efficacious long lasting fertilizing systems. U. S. Patent 3,748,115 teaches that plant nutrients can be bound in a matrix of synthetic rub¬ ber, waxes, asphalt, and the like. In this work, four critical elements of the invention are set forth The fertilizer, emphasizing bulk materials and not trace nutrient, must be uniformly dispensed in a hydrophobic binding element. The dispensing unit must be cylindrical in shape. Said cylinder must be partially coated with a water-insoluble, water-permea ble exterior membrane. A portion of the cylinder must be non-coated with said membrane. U. S. Patent 3,520,651 extends this art to teach that more than one nutrient can be incorporated in similar dis- pensing commodities. In contrast, the subject invention is re¬ lated to trace nutrient elements, the binding matrix need not be hydrophobic, the dispenser can take any shape although the granule or pellet is preferred, and no exterior membrane is utilized. Of course, fertilizing materials have long been compounded with various binders to facilitate dispersal and, in some cases, to prolong availability by slowing the rate of solution in water through pre- eluding immediate nutrient element contact with water. U. S. Patent 3,336,129 teaches that the use of small amounts of water insoluble copolymers and terpolymers of ethers, substituted ethers, ethylene oxide and the like will serve as carriers for fertilizing ma- terials, said copolymers and interpolymers must be crossliked. Materials are comprised of polymer + fertilizer + water + soil components and the plant is grown within this medium. Also, fertilizers such as urea can be coated in a granular form as taught in U. S. Patent 3,336,155 thus retarding solution in ground " aters, ϋ. S. Patent 3,276,857 teaches that a fertilizer can be encapsulated with asphalt or various waxes and thus emission into the environment is slowed. DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide for the slow release of plant trace nutrients. It is another object of the present inven¬ tion to provide for the slow release of trace nutrie as above, wherein said trace nutrients are contained in a polymer matrix. It is a further object of the present invention to provide for the slow release of trace nutrients, as above, wherein said trace nutrients include zinc, iron, copper, boron, manganese, molyb¬ denum, magnesium, cobalt, and selenium. It is an additional object of the present invention to provide for the slow release of trace nutrients, as above, wherein said trace nutrients, when applied to soil and through water dissolution, is readily available to various plants such as crops, citrus fruits, nuts, vegetables, pasture grasses, trees, and the like through natural processes such a absorption of the trace nutrient during uptake of th nutrient-enriched water. It is still another object of the present invention to provide for the slow release of trace nutrients, as above, wherein said polymer matrix is made from a copolymer of ethylene-vinyl acetate, a copolymer of ethylene-propylene, a low density poly¬ ethylene, and combinations thereof. It is a still further object of the presen invention to provide for the slow release of trace nutrients, as above, wherein said polymer matrix is made from a copolymer of ethylene-vinyl acetate, a copolymer of ethylene-propylene, and combinations thereof. •li¬ lt is yet another object of the present invention to provide for the slow release of trace nutrients, as above, wherein said polymer matrix contains a porosigen compound. It is yet another object of the present invention to provide for the slow release of trace nutrients, as above, wherein said porosigen desirably is soluble or sparingly soluble in water such that said trace nutrient is released over a time period from a few months to a few years. These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from the specifica¬ tion. In general, a slow release trace nutrient composition, comprises: 100 parts of a polymer matrix; said polymer matrix made from a compound selected from the class consisting of an ethylene- vinyl acetate copolymer, an ethylene-propylene co¬ polymer, a low density polyethylene, and combinations thereof; the amount by weight of said ethylene con¬ stituent in said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer ranging from about 60 percent to about 95 percent, the weight average molecular weight of said ethylene- vinyl acetate copolymer ranging from about 40,000 to about 400,000; the amount by weight of said ethylene constituent in said ethylene-propylene co¬ polymer ranging from about 30 percent to about 75 percent, the weight average molecular weight of said ethylene-propylene copolymer ranging from about 50,000 to about 250,000; said low density polyethylene having a density of from about 0.90 to about 0.94 grams per cc and a weight average molecular weight of from about 100,000 to about 400,000; and a plant trace nutrient contained in said polymer matrix, the amount of said trace nutrient being such that said trace nutrient is slowly released when said polymer matrix is in contact with an aqueous environment. BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION According to the concepts of the present invention, trace nutrients are slowly and controlla- bly released to soil to improve plant growth and yield over an extended period of time. This result is obtained by incorporating the trace nutrient into a polymer matrix. Additionally, the matrix can con¬ tain soluble or sparingly soluble porosigen compounds therein. In my prior copending continuing applica- tions, my invention related to the sustained release of various pesticides, from a polymer matrix, against such aquatic pests such as mosquito larva, the aqua¬ tic larva form of parasites, molluscan hosts of trematode parasites, and the like. The pesticide such as an organotin compound, and the like, could be contained in a polymer matrix which either sank or floated. The- exact nature of the various pesticides and porosigens contained within the polymer matrix, as well as the concepts of the inventions therein, are set forth in my previous continuing applications which are hereby fully incorporated by reference. c: Now it has been found that trace nutrients can slowly be released when contacted by an aquatic environment or moisture, such as rain or moisture in the soil, often times by only the copolymer matrix when the trace nutrient itself is a porosigen, and most always released v/hen using the porosigen compounds set forth below. A polymer matrix binder of the present invention is an ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. Such a copolymer is readily available in commerce and the amount by weight of the ethylene units, based upon the total weight of the copolymer, ranges from about 60 percent to about 95 percent with a range of from about 80 percent to about 93 percent being preferred. The weight average molecular weight of the copolymer generally ranges from about 40,000 to about 400,000 and preferably from about 75,000 to about 300,000. Desirably, the copolymer has an ASTM Test #D1238 melt flow index of from about 6 to about 12 and preferably from about 7 to about 11 and a Vicat softening point of from about 70°C to about 95°C. Since, apparently, the ethylene repeating units in the copolymer act as a regulator with regard to pore size, higher amounts of the ethylene constituent will result in slower release times. Additionally, another polymer matrix or binding agent of the present invention which can be utilized alone or in combination with said ethylene- vinyl acetate copolymer, that is from 1 percent to 99 percent and preferably from about 35 percent to about 60 percent is an ethylene-propylene copolymer having a weight average molecular_weight of from about 50,000 to about 250,000 with a preferred range / o. ?ι of from about 100,000 to about 200,000. The percent by weight of the ethylene units can generally vary from about 30 percent to about 75 percent, and preferably from about 45 " to about 75 percent by weight, based upon the total weight of the copolymer. The melt flow index of the ethylene-propylene co¬ polymer can generally range from about 15 to about 45, and preferably from about 20 to about 32 accord¬ ing to ASTM Test #D1238 at 190°, 21600 gm,gm/10 minute Additionally, it has been found that low density polyethylene can be used by itself as a polymer matrix. Preferably, the polyethylene matrix has been found useful to provide a long release deviation when blended with the ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer or the ethylene-propylene copolymer, or combinations thereof. By low density polyethylene, it is meant a polyethylene having a density of from about 0.90 to 0.94 g/cc and a weight average molecu¬ lar weight of from about 100,000 to about 400,000. The melt flow index of the low density polyethylene may be similar to said ethylene-vinyl acetate co¬ polymer, that is from about 5 to about 14, and pre¬ ferably from about 7 to about-.11, as in Microthene MN 718 (manufactured by U.S.I. Chemicals) .Melt flow = 8.5 g/10 minutes according to ASTM Test #D 1238. Although generally a lower release rate is obtained, the melt flow index of the low density polyethylene may be low, that is from about 1.0 to ■**•* * " bout 5.0 as when Microthene MN 703 is utilized (a low density polyethylene manufactured by USI Chemicals) having a melt index of 1.2 g/10 minutes according to ASTM Test #D1238. Similarly, a low density poly¬ ethylene having a high melt flow index such as from about 11 to 25 may be utilized and results in a greater release rate. Thus, depending upon the rate of release, various amounts of low density polyethy¬ lene may be utilized, as from 1 percent to 99.9 percent. Generally, to obtain desirable release rates, the amount of horaopolyethylene utilized may range from about 30 percent to about 75 percent and, preferably, from about 40 percent to about 60 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the polymer matrix blend, that is the weight of the ethylene- vinyl acetate copolymer and/or the weight of the ethylene-propylene copolymer with the low density polyethylene. * The various trace elements utilized are generally in the form of salts or oxides, which are readily available, desirably low in cost, and are not highly deliquescent. It is noted that the term "salts" includes the various hydrates thereof, that is the mono-, the di-, the tri-, the tetra-, the penta-, the hexa-, the hepta-, etc. Should the salt not exist in a non-hydrate form, the most common forms are meant. With regard to zinc-contain¬ ing compounds which may be utilized as trace nutrients, they include the following: zinc sulfate, sine chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, zinc phosphate, zinc chlorate, zinc nitrate, the various existing hydrates thereof, and the like. Typical copper trace nutrient compounds include copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper 3 ?.1 A r OMF oxychloride, copper nitrate, copper phosphate; various copper complexes such as tetramines, diamines; the various existing hydrates thereof, and the like. Typical iron trace nutrient compounds include iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, the various exist¬ ing hydrates thereof, and the like. Typical manganese trace nutrient compounds include manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, manganese ni¬ trate; the various existing hydrates thereof, and the like. Typical boron trace nutrient compounds include boric acid, sodium biborate; the various existing hydrates thereof, and the like. Typical molybdenum trace nutrient compounds include molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, potassium molybdate, the various existing hydrates thereof, and the like. Typical cobalt trace nutrient compounds include cobalt sulfate, cobalt chlorate, cobalt nitrate; the various existing hydrates thereof, and the like. Typical selenium trace nutrient compounds include sodium selenate, selenium dioxide, selenium trioxide, selenium oxy¬ chloride, selenium disulfide, selenium sulfur oxide, and the like. Typical magnesium compounds include magnesium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium ni¬ trate, magnesium acetate, magnesium oxide, magnesium chloride, magnesium ammonium chloride, magnesium phosphate, magnesium sulfite; the various existing hydrates thereof, and the like. Desirably, the amount of trace nutrient released by the polymer matrix is such to make the plant grow or to supplement the environment. That is, OMPI the soil is supplemented such that the plant's intake is supplemented, preferably to an extent of its normal amount of the particular trace nutrient required. Naturally, the exact amount will vary depending upon several factors such as the lack of the specific trace nutrient in the soil, the various types of soil, the intake requirement of a particular trace nutrient for a specific plant or crop. Thus, the actual amount will vary from site to site, depending upon soil characteristics and the plant species in¬ volved. Accordingly, the exact demands for a parti¬ cular trace nutrient of the present invention will naturally and inherently vary greatly. In order to achieve a desirable amount of trace nutrient required for a particular or specific soil and type of plant, several methods may be utilized. For example, a much larger amount of the polymer matrixes containing the particular trace nutrient or nutrients may be released, i.e., a larger number of pounds per acre. Another method is simply to utilize a formulation having a higher release rate of a particular trace nutrient. Still another method is to use a formula¬ tion having a higher amount of trace nutrient content therein. Yet another method relates to utilizing larger particles, that is, granules or chips. Addi¬ tionally, other variations may also be utilized. As an approximate rule of thumb, the formulation can contain from about 1 percent to about 60 percent by weight of a particular trace nutrient ion, based upon the total weight of the formulation. A desirable amount is from about 2 percent to about 50 percent, with a more desirable amount being from about 4 per¬ cent to about 40 percent. The amount of trace nutrient compound which usually exists as a salt or oxide ranges from about 10 to about 160 parts by wei based upon 100 parts by weight of the polymer, desir bly from about 25 to about 125 parts, and preferably from about 50 to about 100 parts by weight. Generally, a particular soil is usually deficient in one or two trace nutrients. However, in some instances, it may require a few or even several trace nutrients. According to the present invention, a plurality of trace nutrients can be contained within a particular polymer matrix in various amounts suitable to meet the demands of the particular crop or plant desired. Thus, a so-called "one-shot approach" may be utilized-instead of apply ing several applications of polymer matrixes, each containing a different trace nutrient. Release of the trace nutrient is generally confined to the soil environment. However, the plan allowed to assimilate the trace nutrients will not grow unless the soil contains some degree of moistur Thus, moisture is utilized as a transporting materia in dispensing the trace nutrient. Therefore, it is essential that the formed polymer matrix be amenable to water egress and ingress. Thus, the porosity of the polymer matrix becomes important to the slow release process. It is generally believed that the enhancement of microporosity (free volume) as well a macroporosity of the polymer matrix is important to the present invention. Porosity can be imparted by various chemical compounds termed porosity enhancing agents or "porosigens." However, depending upon the type of polymer utilized as well as the type of compound utilized as a trace nutrient which, itself, often times serves as a porosity agent, it is thus not always necessary to utilize such an agent. For example, trace nutrient compounds such as a chloride, copper sulfate, iron sulfate, iron chloride, manganese sulfate, manganese oxide, manganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate and sodium selenate can be utilized without the aid of a porosigen. Of course, a co-porosigen of a low water solubility would increase the rate released and a co-porosigen having a higher water solubility would increase the rate even more. Generally, the amount of trace nutrient and the optional porosigen is such that release occurs over a period in excess of one month to a couple, a few, and even several years. Although largely dependent upon soil conditions and plant intake required, an amount of porosigen is utilized such that the daily release rate of the trace nutrient varies from about 0.001 to about 4 percent by weight per day based upon the total weight of the trace ion available in a particular matrix. A desired daily release rate is from about 0.001 or, more desirably, 0.01 percent to about 3 percent of the total amount of trace nutrient ion available, and more desirably from about 0.90 percent to about 1.6 percent per day, and preferably from about .30 percent to about 1.1 percent per day. As noted above, the type of porosigen will vary depending upon the desired release rate sought. Should a relatively low increase rate be sought over the release rate " level effected by only the polymer and the trace nutrient, a number of moderate or low solubility compounds can be utilized as a porosity-inducing agent. By moderate solubility, it is meant that the solubility is approximately 0.1 grams or less per 100 grams of water, whereas by a low solubility compound, it is meant that it has a solubility of approximately 0.01 grams or less per 100 grams of water. Generally, any compound which is inert with respect to the polymer matrix and the trace nutrient can be utilized,as a porosigen. By inert, it is meant that the porosigen does not chemically react with the polymer or the trace nutrient. Additionally, the porosigen is also not damaging or harmful to the environment in terms of toxicity. Thus, the porosigen can be any compound which is set forth in the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 1977-78 Edition, published by the Chemical Rubber Co., which is hereby fully incorporated by reference and meets the above requirements with regard to solubility and non-harmful to the environment. A suitable class of an inert porosigen compound includes the inorganic salts or the hydrates thereof, or oxides. The cation of such a -BU E OMPI salt may generally be any of the alkaline metals and preferably any of the non-toxic alkaline earth metals, Column 1A and 2A, respectively, of the Perio¬ dic Table. Additionally, various other metals may be utilized such as iron, nickel, zinc, tin, .silver and the like. The anion portion of the salt may generally be any negative charge entity, as the various carbo¬ nates, the various bicarbonates, the various nitrates, nitrites, or nitrides, the various sulfates, sulfites, or sulfides, the various phosphates, phosphites, or phosphides, including the ortho, pyro, hypo, varia¬ tions thereof, and the like. Generally, the sulfates, sulfites and sulfides are preferred as anions, with carbonates being highly preferred. Moreover, as noted above, the anion may be an oxide of the metal. Spe¬ cific examples of coleachants include magnesium carbo¬ nate, magnesium sulfide, magnesium phosphide, magne¬ sium oxide, calcium carbonate, calcium bicarbonate, calcium nitride, calcium oxide, calcium phosphate, calcium phosphite, calcium sulfide, calcium sulfite, iron carbonate, iron sulfate, iron sulfide, iron sulfite, nickel carbonate, nickel sulfide, zinc carbo¬ nate, zinc oxide, zinc sulfide, zinc sulfite, tin sulfide, tin oxide, silver carbonate, silver oxide, silver sulfide, silver sulfite, sodium bicarbonate, lithium phosphate, beryllium oxide, strontium carbo¬ nate, strontium sulfate, and strontium sulfite. Addi¬ tionally, silicon dioxide may also be utilized. Magnesium carbonate, strontium carbonate, ammonium carbonate, and barium carbonate are preferred, with calcium carbonate being highly preferred. When it is desirable to use a porosigen compound having a sparingly soluble or solubility porosigen, that is a solubility greater than 0.1 grams per 100 grams of water, generally any inert an non-environmental harmful compound can be utilized which has a solubility of from about 0.1 to about 1.0 gram and desirably from about 1.0 to about 100 grams per 100 grams of water. Examples of such solu ble compounds are set forth in the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 1977-78 Edition, published by the Chemical Rubber Company which is hereby fully incorporated by reference. Specific examples includ sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate. Generally, the halogen salts of the alkali metals and the alkalin earth metals, Column 1A and 2A, respectively, of the Periodic Table, as well as of nickel, iron, zinc, tin and silver, which have a solubility of at least 0.1 grams/100 grams of water, and preferably the chloride salts thereof can be utilized. The Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 1977-78 Edition, Supra, is hereby fully incorporated as to such specific compounds since the list is rath extensive. Additionally, ammonia as a cation consti- tutes another class of salts with specific examples being ammonium bromide, ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, ammonium chlorate, ammonium chlorite, ammonium chloride, ammonium fluoride, ammonium sulfate, and the like. Additionally, sodium silicat can also be used. Of this group, sodium bicarbonate. sodium carbonate, silicon dioxide, sodium silicate, and ammonium sulfate are preferred. Moreover, inert liquids compatible with and dispersible in the polymer matrix such as the lower and glycerbl glycols may be utilized, especially ethylene glycol. Generally, suitable amounts of a porosigen range from 0.1 to 70 parts by weight based upon 100 parts by weight of polymer matrix, desirably from about 1.0 parts to about 30 parts, and preferably from about 2.0 parts to about 12 parts. The slow release trace nutrient composition or formulation can contain, in addition to the above- mentioned components, various well known and conven¬ tional additives to enhance dispersion, add color, aid in processing, or to alter density. For example, zinc stearate may be utilized as a dispersant in suitable amounts as from 0.2 parts to about 5 or 10 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polymer with about 1 or 2 parts being preferred. The composition can also contain suitable amounts of an attractant-porosigen such as from about 2 to about 25 parts of soy oil or lecithin when it is desired that a particular type of animal eat the nutrient, e.g., cattle, with 4 to 16 parts being desira- ble. Additionally, various amounts, i.e., 1 to 30 or 2 to 12 parts of carbon black may be utilized as a regulant. In order to form a suitable thermoplastic dispenser which releases suitable amounts of the trace nutrient, it is desirable that the particle sizes of the various components be relatively small. For example, it is desirable that the various trace nutrients have a Tyler mesh size of roughly 100 or greater (i.e., a particle size smaller than 100 mesh) and preferably smaller than 200 mesh. Accord¬ ingly, a particle size range for the porosigen is generally the same. The particle size of the ethyle vinyl acetate copolymer, the polyethylene, and the ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer is roughly about 50 to 200 Tyler mesh. Since the composition is made by heating and melting the polymer, .the polymer size prior to formation of the matrix is not very importa The slow release trace nutrient compositio is prepared by mixing the trace nutrient with the copolymer and/or the low density polyethylene either alone or with the porosigen in suitable proportions as indicated above in any conventional mixing appara tus along with various additives such as colorants, dispersants, and the like. The mixture is then coalesced by heating at least above the softening point and preferably above the melting point of the copolymer and partitioned for use in any suitable size or shape, for example, chip, pellet, etc. Thus the mixture may be added to a conventional extruder where it is molded at from about 120°C to about 220° in a suitable form such as a ribbon which can be cut into pellets, etc. Before numerous examples are presented to disclose various embodiments and best mode of the invention, a few general rules are noted with regard to determining the effect of any formulation with regard to release of a trace nutrient. In general. the incorporation of a porosigen agent will cause the release of more trace nutrient on a daily basis. Conversely, the incorporation of a low density poly¬ ethylene will moderate or reduce the daily release, especially if the polyethylene has a low melt flow index (for example, 5.0 or less). If the trace nutrient is fairly soluble in water, for example, 1.0 or greater, or if a very low release rate is desired and the polymer is either the ethylene-propylene copolymer or the ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, a porosigen is not required. Additionally, the ethylene- vinyl acetate copolymer gives better release than the ethylene-propylene copolymer. As well appreciated by one skilled in the art, many factors can effect . the results such as the actual particle or chip size of the polymer matrix, surface area of the polymer matrix or chip, and the like, so that the general rules are just that, general rules. The invention will be better understood by reference to the following examples. Typical formulations for the controlled release of zinc ions are set forth hereinbelow. EXAMPLE I - ZINC SULFATE FORMULATIONS Several formulations of zinc sulfate in various and without porosigen additives are depicted in the follow TABLE I INGREDIENT FORMULATION (P 1-A 1-B 1-C 1-D 1-E 1-F 1-G 1 EVA 763 50 40 50 50 50 50 100 LDPE 718 2 40 50 40 40 40 40 — 1 LDPE 7 3 3 4 Zinc Stearate 2 2 2 2 2 2 ;2 5 Zinc Sulfate 80 80 80 80 60 80 80 Am. Sulfate — — 5 10 5 5 5 7 Ethylene Glycol 2 Sodium Bicarbonate ._. j.. _, _ „ _- *1 Melt Index 9.0) 'Low density polyethylene (U.S. Industrial Chem. Co. code *) Low Density polyethylene (U.S. Industrial Chem. Co. code Zinc stearate used as a dispersant 5 zinc sulfate monohydrate, 200 mesh, Sherwin Williams Co., 'Ammonium sulfate (porosigen) Ethylene glycol (porosigen) 8 Sodium Bicarbonate (porosigen) The materials in Table I were immersed in mineral free distilled water. Said water was analyzed at periodic intervals for zinc ion in accordance with the standard diphenylthiocarbazone method (ASTM 25.077) , After each zinc determination, immersion water was discarded and zinc free water added to the test containers in order to forstall the development of solution equilibrium. Analyses were performed at 1, 2, 7, 14, 21 and 30-day intervals and once monthly thereafter for 4 to 12 months. Steady state conditions typified by a continuous emission rate were achieved, usually by the seventh day past immersion. After initial addition to water, a preliminary high emission is observed as the zinc sulfate molecules on or very close to the surface are dissolved by and lost into the surrounding waters. The following steady state emission rates were determined: EMISSION RATE FORMULATIONS AGENT LOSS PER DAY 1-A 0.04 1-B 0.08 1-C 0.83 1-D 0.38 1-E 0.34 1-F 0.76 1-G 0.37 1-H 0.0 1-1 0.13 1-J 0.37 1-K 1.2 Several salient features underlying the uniqueness of this invention can be noted. (1) Othe factors being constant, comparison of 1-G using ethylene-vinyl acetate alone as the matrix element (0.37 percent per day emission) with formulation 1-H using low density polyethylene (melt index 8.5) as the sole matrix element (0.0 percent per day emissio and formulation l-I using only low density polyethyl (melt index 1.2) indicates that polyethylene alone provides a lower and, in an agricultural context, inferior loss rate. It is evident that the use of a porosity- enhancing agent such as ammonium sulfate and sodium bicarbonate, among others, greatly increases emissio rate. Ethylene glycol in conjunction with ammoniu sulfate greatly enhances porosity growth and hence increased emission. In contrast, ethylene glycol alone provides only a small degree of porosity enhan ment. Under the test conditions used, specificall the fact that immersion water was of slightly acidic pH, the use of sodium bicarbonate as the porosigen provided considerably higher emission rates. Compar formulation 1-J having approximately 3 percent poros gen (0.37 percent per day emission) with 1-K having approximately 6 percent porosigen (1.2 percent per day emission) . EXAMPLE II - ZINC OXIDE FORMULATIONS The low water solubility of zinc oxide resu in much lower omission rates as compared with the BURE OMPI highly water soluble zinc sulfate material of the previous example. A few formulations are depicted below: TABLE II Ingredient FORMULATION (parts) 2-A 2-B 2-C 2-D 2-E EVA 763 50 50 50 100 50 LDPE 718 40 40 40 — LDPE 703 40 Zinc Stearate 2 2 2 2. 2 Zinc Oxide 80 80 80 80 80 Ammonium Sulfate — 5 — — 5 Sodium Bicarbonate — —— ' 5 —— Periodic zinc analysis using the procedure previously described provided the following results: EMISSION RATE FORMULATION % AGENT LOSS PER DAY 2-A 0.005 percent 2-B 0.014 percent 2-C 0.017 percent 2-D 0.017 percent 2-E 0.018 percent Comparing 2-A (no porosigen) to 2-B (3 percent ammonium sulfate) again indicates the enhance¬ ment of porosity, and hence emission, observed by the use of such additives. Also comparing 2-D (using ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer alone) having a 0.017 percent per day emission with 2-A, wherein ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer is modified with polyethylene, indicates the moderating effect of said polyethylene. Importantly, it is observed that when ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (melt index 9.0) is modified with polyethylene of melt index 8.5 (MN 718) , emission is present. EXAMPLE III - ZINC CHLORIDE FORMULATIONS Several formulations using highly water soluble zinc chloride salt (432 g/100 g H 2 0 compared to 100 g/lOOg H^0 zinc sulfate soluble) were simi¬ larly prepared and evaluated for zinc emission rate. Formulations and emission rates are shown below. TABLE Ill Ingredient FORMULATION (parts) 3-A 3-B 3-C EVA 100 — — MN 718 — 100 — MN 703 — — 100 Zinc Stearate 2 2 2 Zinc Chloride 80 80 80 Ammonium Sulfate 5 — — Emission Rate % 2. _ 1Le * a- 0.18% 0.90% loss per day In this instance, the extreme water solu¬ bility of zinc chloride is such that it, in essence, acts as its own porosigen, porosity growth arising as the zinc ion is rapidly dissolved into the surrounding water. Although the highest emission is is from ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer as expected, polyethylene will also bind and emit, though at a much reduced rate. EXAMPLE IV - ZINC CARBONATE FORMULATIONS Under practical use conditions, the very low emission observed with " zinc oxide materials and the high rates expected with zinc chloride " may not be optimal in many instances. Likewise, zinc sulfate having considerable water solubility may not be accept¬ able in an agricultural situation of high rainfall and/or prolonged heavy ground moisture, rice paddy for instance. Thus, a relatively low solubility of controlled-release zinc carbonate might be ' of greater utility. Formulations and emission rates are depicted in the following table: TABLE IV Ingredient FORMULATION (Parts) 4-A 4-B ^_C 4-^D 4^15 M MUU 776633 5 500 5 500 50 100 100 MU 718 40 40 40 Zinc Stearate 2 2 2 — 2 Zinc Carbonate 50 80 80 80 80 E Etthhyylleennee GGllyyccooll 2 255 — Sodium Bicarbonate — — Ammonium Sulfate — — 5 Emission Rate 0.0% 0.014% 0.038% 0.029% 0.040. % Loss per day It is observed that even large amounts of ethylene glycol without another porosigen also present does not enhance porosity. Comparing 4-D using MU 763 only as the binding matrix without a porosigen to essentially the same material with about 3 percent ammonium sulfate (4-C) , the porosity enhancement in the latter case leads to a higher emission rate. BIOASSAY EVALUATION Due to the high variability of composition and nature of soils, and the lack of a standard soil type, the tests described herein as typifying the invention have been performed in water since standard ization is possible. It is recognized that (1) the e use of the formulations of this invention are in application to soil for C2) the increase in the yield Q of specific agricultural commodities. In this respec a fast emission zinc sulfate formulation and a slow emission zinc carbonate formulation were evaluated in zinc poor soil as a means of as-certaining merit therein. Soy Bean plants were grown in seven inch 5 diameter pots in the laboratory, said pots each con¬ taining 1,300 grams of soil. Two hundred milliliters of water were added once daily. Results are shown below: GROWTH RATE OF SOY BEANS IN ZINC POOR 0 SOIL TREATED WITH CONTROLLED RELEASE ZINC FORMULATION POT AVERAGE POST ZINC CONTENT COMPOUND DOSAGE GERMINATION STEM GROWTH (Leachate) 1-Dl 1 g 2.75 cm/day 0.0015 ppm/day 0.5 g 1.94 cm/day 0.0011 ppm/day 5 0.2 g 1.40 cm/day 0.0007 ppm/day 0.1 g 1.14 cm/day 0.0002 ppm/day Control 0.0 g 1.09 cm/day 0.00008 ppm/day 4-E 2 1 g 3.13 cm/day 0.0003 ppm/day 0.5 g 2.20 cm/day 0.0004 ppm/day 0.2 g 2.14 cm/day 0.0002 ppm/day Cl g 1.95 cm/day 0.0002 ppm/day Control 0.0 g 1.07 cm/day 0.00008 ppm/day As can be observed in examining the bioassa data, a definite enhancement in soy bean growth is present due to the use of controlled release zinc jU EAt OMPI formulations. It is further noted that in this, in¬ stance th-e zinc carbonate, materi.a,l gaye better growth characteristics in that less of the emitted agent was lost through leaching. To further illustrate the im¬ portance of the distinction Between fast and slow emission formulations, zinc analysis was performed on plant tissue and soil after 56 days of growth. Results are shown below: Zn++ Zn++ Zn++ FORMULATION DOSAGE (Soil) (Leaf) (Root) 1-D J 1.0 g 0.075 ppm 0.03 ppm 0.10 ppm 0.5 g 0.060 ppm 0.05 ppm 0.09 ppm 0.2. g 0.050 ppm 0.03 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.1 g 0.050 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.07 ppm Control 0.0 0.00 0.05 ppm 0.04 ppm 4-E 2 1.0 g 0.01 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.05 ppm 0.5 g 0.01 ppm 0.05 ppm 0.03 ppm 0.2 g 0.04 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.02 ppm 0.1 g 0.02 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.01 ppm Control 0.0 0.005 ppm 0.05 ppm 0.01 ppm Whereas the higher emission rate of 1-D leads to a greater soil concentration at any given instant than that seen with 4-E; the leaf content is greater and hence plant growth, in the latter instance. Under differing moisture conditions, the values might well reverse. 43 percent zinc sulfate and 6 percent porosigen; rapid release. 2 44 percent zinc carbonate and no porosigen providing a very slow release. EXAMPLE V - COPPER EMISSION Several coppe salts and oxides were in¬ corporated in plastic matrices and the release rates : measured in demineralized water using the procedure previously described. The Bicinchoninate method of determining copper ion content was used. COPPER -SULFATE MONOHYDRATE MATERIALS (CuSo^H^) A number of formulations containing copper sulfate monohydrate were prepared in accordance with the following recipes. Unlike zinc formulations, it was discovered that an ethylene-propylene thermoplast (.Vis-talon 702, melt index 27, product of Exxon Chemic Co.), when modified By a low density polyethylene, provided a superior release rate. TABLE V Ingredient Formulation 5-A 5-B 5-C 5-D 5-E 5-F EPM 702 100 50 LDPE 718 — 100 40 — 50 LDPE 703 50 — EVA 763 — — 50 100 50 — Zinc Stearate 2 2 2 2 .2 2 Copper Sulfate Monohydrate 80 80 80 80 80 80 Ammonium Sulfate 5 5 — 5 — — Ingredient 5-G 5-H 5-1 EPM 702 100 50 LDPE 718 100 50 Zinc Stearate 2 2 Copper Sulfate Monohydrate 80 80 100 Ammonium Sulfate 5 ■ βU E OMPI Copper release rate in water was found to be as follows: Release Rate Formulation (% copper ion/day) Remarks 5-A 0.19 % EPM 702, with (NH.) 2 SO. additive as a porosi¬ gen 5-B 0.19 % LDPE 718, with (NH 4 ) 2 S0 4 additive as a porosigen 5-C 0.026 % EVA 763/LDPE 718, no porosigen 5-D 0.15 % EVA 763 with (NH 4 ) 2 S0 4 additive as a porosigen 5-E 0.37 % EVA 763/LDPE 703, no porosigen 5-F 0.28 % EPM 702/LDPE 718, no - porosigen 5-G 0.002% EPM 702, no porosigen 5-H 0.0021% LDPE 718, no porosigen 5-1 0.31 % EPM 702/LDPE 718 with (NH 4 ) 2 S0 4 additives as the porosigen It is evident that the addition of a porosi¬ ty enhancing agent, ammonium sulfate, greatly increases the loss rate of copper ion. When a LDPE is used, whose melt index varies greatly from that of EVA, enhanced release is obtained, for example, EVA 763 of a melt index 9.0 modified with LDPE 718 of melt index 8.5, as with compound 5-C displays a very slow copper ion emission, whereas EVA 763 of melt index 9.0 modified with LDPE 703 of melt index 1.2, as with compound 5-E has a much higher emission rate. ζ_ ) REA T OMPI EXAMPLE VI - COPPER CARBONATE EMITTING FORMULATIONS Formulations were prepared containing very low solubility copper carbonate as the copper ion source. Recipes are shown below: TABLE VI Ingredient Formulation 6-A 6-B 6-C 6-D EPM 702 50 100 LDPE 718 50 LDPE 703 EVA 763 — — 100 50 Zinc Stearate 2 2 2 2 Copper Carbonate 80 80 80 80 Ammonium Sulfate — — — — Measured loss rates over a 120-day period are shown below with other pertinent information: Loss Rate % Melt Formulation Cu-f-/day Matrix Indices Porosigen 6-A 0.0021% EPM 702/ 27/8.5 none LDPE 718 6-B 0.0033% EPM 702 27 none 6-C 0.0042% EVA 763 9.0 none 6-D 0.0017% EVA 763/ 9.0/1.2 none LDPE 703 It is again noted that the use of a low density polyethylene modifier lowers the copper emission rate. EXAMPLE VII - COPPER OXYCHLORIDE FORMULATIONS Several controlled-release copper formula¬ tions were prepared utilizing Cu_(OH)_Cl as the coppe source. It was discovered that the principles pre¬ viously enumerated similarly held for this material incorporated in thermoplastics. Note the following recipe comparison. • TABLE VII Ingredient 7-A 7---B LDPE 718 (M.I. = 8.5) 50 — EPM 702 (M.I. = 27) 50 100 Zinc Stearate 2 2 Cu 2 (OH) 3 C1 80 80 Ammonium Sulfate 5 5 Loss Rate % Cu ++ /day 0.021% 0.0057% It is again observed that emission rate is enhanced when LDPE is used to modify the EPM matrix. EXAMPLE VIII - CUPROUS OXIDE FORMULATIONS Cuprous oxide having extremely low water solubility was incorporated in thermoplastic matrices and loss rate measured as depicted below. \1 Z_. ' T o?.-r?ι TABLE VIII INGREDIENT 8-A 8-B 8-C 8-D 8-E 8-F 8-G LDPE 718 50 50 — — 100 100 — EPM 702 50 50 100 100 — — — LDPE 703 — — — — — — 50 EVA 763 — — — — — • — 50 Zinc Stearate 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cuprous Oxide 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 ( H 4 ) 2 S0 4 — 5 — 5 5 — 5 10 Loss Rate % Cu/day 0.0028 0.0031 0, .0023 0.0027 0.0037 0.0027 0.0010 Although emission rates are quite low again, it is observed that said rate is enhanced through the use of a porosigen. It is duly noted that emission rate of copper ion from the aforementioned formulations is temperature dependent.. When soil conditions are cold and plant growth absent, the wasteful emission of copper is drastically reduced, while as the growing season pro¬ gresses with warming weather, copper release increases to fully satisfy, when appropriate dosages are used, the needs of the crops. The following data taken as water emission rate at several temperatures exempli- fies this phenomenon. RELEASE OF Cu ++ FROM 5-1 (Accumulative % Release, average of replicates) Time (days) 90°F 72° 40°F 1 6.4% 5.5% 4.6% 5 14.0% 7.5% 6.3% 10 14.9% 9.9% 6.35% 20 17.5% 12.5% 6.65% 31 26.9% 13.2% 7.1% 45 31.4% 15.5% 7.55% 60 32.4% 18.6% 7.6% 87 38.7% 23.8% 7.7% 118 41.75% — 8.1% 158 45.6% — 8.4% EXAMPLE IX - IRON EMISSION Various water soluble or sparingly water iron salts or oxides can be incorporated in ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers and low density polyethylene and blends thereof, and upon exposure to moisture caused to release iron ion at a controllable rate. I bearing chemicals utilizable include ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, ferric oxide, ferric ammonium citrat ferrous oxide, and the like, excepting those material that decompose at extrusion temperatures such as ferric nitrate and ferric ammonium sulfate. Recipes for several formulations are shown below with extru¬ sion conditions. TABLE IX Ingredient 9- -A 9-B 9-C 9-D 9- LDPE 718 50 25 — 50 50 EPM 702 — 25 — 50 50 EVA 763 — — 50 — — Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 2 2 FeCl 3 -6H 2 0 25 — — — — FeS0 4 -7H 2 0 — 50 50 — — Fe 2 0 3 — - — — 80 80 Ammonium Sulfate — — — 5 — Extrusion Barrel Temp. 400°F 420°F 400°F 370°F 390° Die Temp. 400 c -F 400°F 400°F 390°F 410° Loss rate is demineralized water averaged over the post immersion period from day 8 to day 151 is as follows: 9-A 0.052% Fe release per day 9-B 0.17% Fe release per day 9-C 0.216% Fe release per day 9-D 0.0017% Fe release per day 9-E 0.0010% Fe release per day Iron content in water is determined by the ferrozine method, L.L. Stookey, Anal. Chem. 42(7) , 779, 1970. IfilRE OMPI EXAMPLE X - MANGANESE FORMULATIONS Controlled-release manganese emittors were prepared in accordance with the principles outlined herein. Manganese chloride, manganese sulfate and manganese dioxide were used as the agents. Several illustrative recipes are presented below: TABLE X Ingredient 10-A 10-B 10-C 10-D (parts by weight EVA 763 100 —_ 25 50 LDPE 718 — — 20 — LDPE 703 — — — — EPM 702 — 50 — — Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 1 Manganese Sulfate-*- — 51 51 50 Manganese Chloride 2 — — — — Manganese Dioxide 80 — — — Ammonium Sulfate —— —— —— 5 10-E 10-F 10-G 10-H EVA 763 50 50 25 — LDPE 718 — — 20 — LDPE 703 — — — 50 EPM 702 — — — — Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 1 Manganese Sulfate 60 — —— —— Manganese Chloride * " 25 30 30 Manganese Dioxide Ammonium Sulfate 'MgCl 2 '4H 2 0 Said formulations were immersed in water an manganese release determined periodically as depicte below. It is noted that manganese dioxide having a very low solubility possesses a correspondingly low release rate - approximately 0.001 percent total manganese per day. Release Rate of Manganese Compounds in Wate Initial Mn Loss Rate; % Loss/ Formulation Loss (.30 days) Day 31 to Day 122 10-B 48.2% 0.18% 10-C 52.2% 0.27% 10-D 43.0% 0.35% 10-E 52.9% 0.27% 10-F 46.9% 0.085% 10-G 54.2% 0.06% 10-H 21.6% 0.047% Both manganese sulfate and manganese chlori formulations show high "initial loss over the first 30 days or so immersion. After that time, a steady state situation is reached. It is noted that the manganese sulfate emitting materials show a higher loss rate due to the greater water solubility of this agent. Formulation 10-D, an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer matrix using ammonium sulfate as a porosige exhibits the greatest degree of release. EXAMPLE XI - CONTROLLED RELEASE BORON MATERIALS Boron emitting materials were prepared Manganese in water is determined by the tetraphenyl arsonium chloride method. The Analyst 87, 435, June 1962. *u_.*-- ' in accordance with the principles outlined herein. Several such compounds are depicted below. Boric acid and sodium biborate, both being highly water soluble are preferred over other boron salts. Sodium bicarbonate was used as the porosigen. TABLE XI Ingredient Formulation 11-A 11-B 11-C 11-D Vistalon 703 60 100 — — LDPE 718 40 — — — EVA 763 — — 100 100 Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 1 Boric Acid (Na B 0 ) 50 50 50 50 Sodium Bicarbonate — — — 2 11-E 11-F Vistalon 702 LDPE 718 50 EVA 763 40 100 Zinc Stearate 1 2 Boric Acid (Na B^O ) 50 75 Sodium Bicarbonate Ingredient Formulation 11-C 11-H 11-J 11-K 11-L Vistalon 702 60 100 — — — LDPE 718 40 — — 50 — EVA 763 — — 100 40 100 Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 1 2 Na 2 B 4 0 7 50 50 50 50 75 NaHCO.. —— — 2 — — Immersion in water indicated the following release rates. BORIC ACID GROUP Formulation Release Rate (%/Day) Remarks 5 11-B 0.130% Vistalon 702 matrix 11-A 0.135% Vistalon 702 modified with low density polyethylene 11-F 0.321% EVA 763 matrix 11-D 0.321% EVA 763 with NaHCO^ 10 as a porosigen Cno effect) 5.78% boron content 11-C 0.378% EVA 763 containing 5.85% boron content 11-E 0.722% EVA 763 modified with . c - low density polyethy¬ lene to provide much higher release rate 6.27% boron content SODIUM BIBORATE GROUP 11-L 0.390% EVA 763, no modifi¬ cation, contains 20 9.22% boron. 11-K 0.552% EVA 763, modified with low density polyethylene, con¬ tains 7.72% boron 11-J 0.765% EVA 763 with a poro- „.. sigen, contains 7.14% boron 11-G 0.63% Ethylene-propylene copolymer modified with low density polyethylene, with 7.12% boron 30 11-H 0 . 66 % Ethylene-propylene copolymer with no modification , with 7. 21% boron -gURE Boron in water was determined by the method described in APHA Standard Methods 13 Ed. p. 72, 1971. EXAMPLE XII - CONTROLLED RELEASE MOLYBDENUM MATERIALS Controlled release molybdenum formulations were prepared in accordance with the recipes shown below: TABLE XII Formulation No. Ingredient 12-A 12-B 12- •C 12-D 12-E 12-F Vistalon 702 50 LDPE 718 50 100 Zinc Stearate 2 2 1 1 1 2 Mo0 3 75 75 75 50 50 — EVA 763 — — 100 100 — — LDPE 703 — — — — 75 100 Na 2 Mo0 4 75 Formulation No. Ingredient 12-G 12-H 12- ■ I 12-J 12-K Vistalon 702 100 100 50 50 50 Zinc Stearate 1 2 1 2 2 a 2 Mo0 4 50 75 50 75 75 LDPE 718 — — 50 50 50 (NH 4 ) 2 S0 4 — — — 3 _a ~ -m _ . Initial 24-hour release and average daily release after release is shown below. Molybdenum content in water was determined using the technique in Analytical Chemistry 25(9), 1363, 1953. Mo. Initial Daily Release Rat Formulation Content 24-Hour CDay 7 through (1%) Release * Day 30) 12-A 28.2 0.38% 0.06% 12-B 28.2 0.63% 0.09% 12-C 28.2 0-.80% 0.06% 12-D 22.0 0.69% 0.04% 12-E 26.4 0.67% 0.03% 12-F 19.8 1.26% 0.09% 12-G 15.4 15.9% 1.00% 12-H 19.7 20.3% 1.18% 12-1 15.4 17.8% 1.81% 12-J 19.4 33.8% 1.45% 12-K 19.4 34.5% 1.63% The effects of lower water solubility of MoO-,, (O.lg/lOOg cold water) , as compared to Na_Mo0 4 , (44g/100g cold water) can readily be seen through comparing compounds 12-A through 12-E containing Mo0 3 with compounds 12-F through 12-K wherein Na 2 Mo0 4 in LDPE shows the relatively small initial loss rate in comparison with formulations 12-G through 12-K uti¬ lizing an ethylene-propylene matrix with or without an LDPE modifier. Examining of 12-H (19.7% Na 2 Mo0 4 ) and 12-G (15.4% Na.MoO it is seen that the loss rat is partially dependent upon the total agent loading. Comparison of compounds 12-C (28.2% MoO_) and 12-D (22.0% MoO..) one notes the same effect. Whereas 12-G (15.4% a 2 Mo0 4 in Vistalon 702) provides a 1.00% per day release in water, 12-1 (15.4% Na MoO ) wherein Vistalon 702 is modified with LDPE 718 a much higher, 1.81% per day, loss rate is indicated. Interestingly, compounds 12-J and 12-K, both using a porosigen addi- tive, show extremely high initial loss rate of 33.8% and 34.5% for the first 24 hours post immersion, respectively. In this instance, the use of a porosi¬ gen is contraindicated. EXAMPLE XIII - CONTROLLED RELEASE COBALT MATERIALS Controlled release cobalt formulations, using cobalt sulfate as the agent, were prepared in accordance with the recipes shown below. TABLE XIII Formulation No. Ingredient 13-A 13-B 13-C 13-D 13-E Vistalon 702 60 60 — — — LDPE 718 40 40 100 — — LDPE 703 — — — — 100 EVA 763 — — — 100 — Zinc .Stearate 1 1 1 1 1 CoSO 4 -7H 2 0 50 75 50 50 50 (NH 4 ) 2 S0 4 — — — — — NaHC0 3 Carbon Black Formulation No. 1,3-F 13-π 13-1 Vistalon 702 — — — — LDPE 718 — — — — LDPE 703 — — — — EVA 763 100 100 100 100 Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 1 CoSO 4 -7H 2 0 75 50 50 50 (NH 4 ) 2 S0 4 — 5 — — NaHC0 3 Carbon Black OMPI Cobalt loss from an immersed pellet into deraineralized water was measured in accordance with the technique prescribed by Pyatnitskii ("Analytical Chemistry of the Elements," p. 130, Humphrey Science Pub. Co., Ann Arbor, Mich. 1969). Emission rate over the immersion period .from day 7 to day 30 and other pertinent data is shown below: Formulation No. Emission Rate Remarks (per day) 13-E 0.13% Low density polyethyle (.703) matrix, no porosigen, 12.2% total cobalt content CW/W) 13-C 0.29% Low density polyethylen (718) matrix, no porosi gen 14.4% total cobalt content (W/W) 13-A 0.24% Vistalon 702 EPM matrix modified with LDPE 718. Only 5.9% total cobalt content (W/W) No porosi gen. 13-B 0.39% Vistalon 702 EPM matrix modified with LDPE 718, but with a higher (12.3 total cobalt content. porosigen. 13-D 0.53% EVA 763 matrix, no por¬ osigen. Total cobalt content 10.4%(W/W) . 13-F 0.69% EVA 763 matrix, no porosigen. Higher tota cobalt content, 12.1% (W/W) . 13-1 0.90% EVA 763 matrix with carbon black as an addi tive to increase free volume. BURE OMPI Formulation No. Emission Rate Remarks (per day) 13-G 0.95% EVA 763 matrix with ammonium sulfate addi¬ tive as a porosigen. 13-H 1.05% EVA 763 matrix with sodium bicarbonate as a porisigen. Cobalt sulfate is a highly soluble material (60.4g/100g cold water) and thus essentially serves a porosigenic function in LDPE so that emission is possible. EXAMPLE XIV - CONTROLLED RELEASE SELENIUM MATERIALS The following controlled release materials, using sodium selenate as the agent, were prepared and immersed in dimineralized water. TABLE XIV Ingredient Formulation NO β 14-A 14-B 14- ■ C 14-D LDPE 718 25 25 25 25 EVA 763 — 25 — 25 Vistalon 702 25 — 25 — Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 1 Na 2 Se0 4 25 25 25 25 ( H 4 ) 2 S0 4 — — 2 — NaHC0 3 — — — 2 In accordance with agricultural needs, release rates are very low as measured over a 120-day period in demineralized water. 14-A 0.0071% Se emission per day 14-B 0.0066% Se emission per day 14-C 0.0053% Se emission per day 14-D 0.0055% Se emission per day EXAMPLES XV - CONTROLLED RELEASE MAGNESIUM FORMULATI Recipes for several typical magnesium emitters are shown below: TABLE XV Ingredient Formulation No. 15-A - 15-B 15-C Vistalon 702 25 — 25 EVA 763 — 50 LSPE 718 25 — 25 Zinc Stearate 1 1 1 10 Mg C0 3 15 15 Mg S0 4 — — 15 Release in demineralized water was measured periodically and a rate of 0.15%/day (15-A), 0.09%/d (15-B), and 0.48%/day (15-C) noted. Magnesium 15 analysis was performed by the method described in Flaschka, H.A. , et al. , Quantitative Analytical Chemistry, Vol. II, p. 140, Harper and Row, pub. Inc. N.Y., 1969. EXAMPLE XVI - MULTIPLE ELEMENT RELEASE -20 With proper compounding, it is possible to release two or more elements simultaneously from the same matrix. In treating soil, that is cobalt poor, and which also requires a small supplement of zinc 25 and iron formulation (16) , shown below, can be utilized. TABLE XVI Ingredient Recipe EVA 763 100 30 Zinc Stearate _.l Cobalt Sulfate* 25 Iron Oxide** 25 Zinc Oxide*** 10 * CoS0 4 * 7H 2 0 ** Fe 2 0 3 *** ZnO A daily loss rate of 0.25%/day cobalt, 0.002%/day iron and 0.01%/day zinc was measured. Multiple emission from one matrix can thus be accomplished and a material tailored to meet specific soil needs in some instances. It is, however, more likely that a given trace element's need can be met by appropriately mixing the proper proportion of different emitters (i.e. different matrices) during application to a given soil. While in accordance with the patent statutes, only the preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in detail,therefore, for the true * scope of the invention, reference should be had to the appended claims.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion, comprising: 100 parts of a polymer matrix; said polymer matrix made from a compound selected from the class consisting of an ethylene-vin acetate copolymer, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, a low density polyethylene, and combinations thereof; the amount by weight of said ethylene constituent in said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer ranging from about 60 percent to about 95 percent, the weight average molecular weight of said ethylene- vinyl acetate copolymer ranging from about 40,000 to about 400,000; the amount by weight of said ethylene constituent in said ethylene-propylene copolymer ranging from about 30 percent to about 75 percent, the weight average molecular weight of said ethylene- propylene copolymer ranging from about 50,000 to about 250,000; said low density polyethylene having a density of from about 0.90 to about 0.94 grams per cc and a weight average molecular weight of from about 100,000 to about 400,000; and a plant trace nutrient contained in said polymer matrix, the amount of said trace nutrient being such that said trace nutrient is slowly re¬ leased when said polymer matrix is in contact with moisture. 2. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 1, wherein the amount of trace nutrient released is sufficient to stimulate plant growth. 3. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 2, wherein said trace nutrient is selected from the class consisting of zinc, copper, iron, manganese, boron, molybdenum, cobalt, selenium, and magnesium. 4. A slow release trace nutrient composit¬ ion according to Claim 3, wherein said polymer matrix is selected from the class consisting of said ethylene- propylene copolymer, said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, and combinations thereof. 5. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 4, wherein said polymer matrix includes from about 30 percent to about 75 percent by weight of a low density polyethylene based upon the total weight of said low density polyethylene and said copolymer, said polyethylene having a density of from about 0.9 to about 0.94 grams per cc and a weight average molecular weight of from about 100,000 to about 400,000. 6. A slow release trace nutrient composition according to Claim 5, wherein said ethylene-propylene copolymer has a melt flow index of from about 15 to about 45, wherein said ethylene-vinyl acetate has a elt flow index of from about 6 to about 12, and wherein said low density polyethylene has a melt flo index of from about 5 to about 14. 7. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 6, wherein the amount of ethylene by weight in said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer ranges from about 80 percent to about 93 percent, and wherein the amount of ethylene in said ethylene-propylene copolymer ranges from about 45 to about 75 percent by weight. 8. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 7, wherein said trace nutrie is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, zinc phosphate, zinc chlorate, zinc nitrate, the various hydrates of said zinc compounds, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, copper nitrate, copper phosphate, the various hydrates of said copper compounds, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, the various hydrates of said iron compounds, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, manganese nitrate, the various hydrates of said manganese compounds, boric acid, sodium biborate, the various hydrates of said boron compounds, molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, potassium molybdate, the various hydrates of said molybdenum compounds, cobalt sulfate, cobalt chlorate, cobalt nitrate, the various hydrates of said cobalt compounds, sodium selenate, selenium dioxide, selenium trioxide, selenium oxy¬ chloride, selenium disulfide, selenium sulfur oxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium nitrate, magnesium acetate, magnesium oxide, magnesium phosphate, magnesium sulfite, and the various hydrates of said magnesium compounds. 9. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 7, wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, man¬ ganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, molyb¬ denum oxide, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate, sodium selenate magnesium carbonate, and magnesium sulfate. 10. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 1, wherein the amount of trace nutrient compound is such that the daily loss rate of said trace nutrient, when in contact with said moisture, ranges from about 0.01 percent to about 3.0 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the cation portion of said trace nutrient compound contained in said polymer matrix. 11. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 1, wherein the amount of said trace nutrient compound ranges from about 10 parts to about 160 parts by weight. *. 7τ r * a **--- b < - -. J zA 12. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 10 or 11, wherein said trace nutrient is selected from the class consisting of zinc, copper, iron, manganese, boron, molybdenum, cobalt, selenium, and magnesium. 13. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 12, wherein said polymer matrix is selected from the class consisting of said ethylene-propylene copolymer, said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, and combinations thereof. 14. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 13, wherein said polymer matrix includes from about 30 percent to about 75 percent by weight of a low density polyethylene base upon the total weight of said low density polyethyle and said copolymer, said polyethylene having a densi ty of from about 0.9 to about 0.94 grams per cc and a weight average molecular weight of from about 100,000 to about 400,000. 15. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 14, wherein said ethylene- propylene copolymer has a melt flow index of from about 15 to about 45, wherein said ethylene-vinyl acetate has a melt flow index of from about 6 to about 12, and wherein said low density polyethylene has a melt flow index of from about 1 to about 25. -fϋ EΛ _0MPI 16. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 15, wherein said daily re¬ lease rate of said trace nutrient cation ranges from about 0.09 to about 1.6 weight percent. 17. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 15, wherein the amount of said trace nutrient compound ranges from about 25 parts to about 125 parts. 18. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 16, wherein the amount of ethylene by weight in said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer ranges from about 80 percent to about 93 percent, and wherein the amount of ethylene in said ethylene-propylene copolymer ranges from about 45 to about 75 percent by weight. 19. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 17, wherein the amount of ethylene by weight in said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer ranges from about 80 percent to about 93 percent, and wherein the amount of ethylene in said ethylene-propylene copolymer ranges from about 45 to about 75 percent by weight. 20. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 19, wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class con- sisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbo¬ nate, zinc oxide, zinc phosphate, zinc chlorate, zinc nitrate, the various hydrates of said zinc com¬ pounds, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, copper nitrate, copper phosphate, the various hydrates of said copper co - pounds, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, the various hydrates of said iron compounds, manga¬ nese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, manganese nitrate, the various hydrates of said manganese compounds, boric acid, sodium biborate, the various hydrates of said boron compounds, molyb¬ denum oxide, sodium molybdate, potassium molybdate, the various hydrates of said molybdenum compounds, cobalt sulfate, cobalt chlorate, cobalt nitrate, the various hydrates of said cobalt compounds, sodium selenate, selenium dioxide, selenium trioxide selenium oxychloride, selenium disulfide, selenium sulfur oxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium sulfate magnesium nitrate, magnesium acetate, magnesium oxide, magnesium phosphate, magnesium sulfite, and the various hydrates of said magnesium compounds. 21. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 7, wherein said trace nutrie is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate, sodium selenate, magnesium carbonate, and magnesium sulfate. 22. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 20, wherein said daily cation release rate ranges from about 0.30 to about 1.1 weight percent of the total cation in said polymer matrix. 23. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 21, wherein the amount of said trace nutrient compound ranges from about 50 parts to about 100 parts. 24. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 22, wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate, sodium selenate, magnesium carbonate, and magnesium sulfate. 25. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 12, including a porosigen, said porosigen selected from the class consisting of an oxide and a salt, said oxide and salt having a cation selected from the class consisting of the alkalin metals, the alkalin earth metals, ammonium, iron, zinc, nickel, silver and tin, and said salt having an anion selected from the class consisting of a carbonate, bicarbonate, nitrate, nitrite, nitri peroxide, phosphate, phosphite, phosphide, sulfate, sulfite sulfide, bromide, fluoride, -iodide, and chloride, said porosigen having a solubility of at least 0.1 grams per 100 grams of water. 26. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 25, wherein the amount of porosigen ranges from about 0.1 to about 70 parts by weight. 27. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 26, wherein said polymer matrix is selected from the class consisting of said ethylene-propylene copolymer, said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, and combinations thereof. 28. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 27, wherein said ethylene- propylene copolymer has a melt flow index of from about 15 to about 45, wherein said ethylene-vinyl acetate has a melt flow index of from about 6 to about 12, and wherein said low density polyethylene has a melt flow index of from about 1 to about 25. 29. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 28, wherein said daily re¬ lease rate of said trace nutrient anion ranges from about 0.09 to about 1.6 weight percent. '^U E I 30. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 28, wherein the amount of said trace nutrient compound ranges from about 25 parts to about 125 parts. 31. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 29, wherein the amount of said porosigen ranges from about 1.0 to about 30 parts by weight. 32.. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 30, wherein the amount of said porosigen ranges from about 1.0 to about 30 parts by weight. 33. A slow release trace nutrient according to Claim 31, wherein the amount of ethylene by weight in said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer ranges from about 80 percent to about 93 percent, wherein the amount of ethylene in said ethylene-propylene copoly¬ mer ranges from about 45 to about 75 percent by weight, 34. A slow release trace nutrient according to Claim 32, wherein the amount of ethylene by weight in said ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer ranges from about 80 percent to about 93 percent, wherein the amount of ethylene in said ethylene-propylene copoly¬ mer ranges from about 45 to about 75 percent by weight. -BUREAU OMPI 35. A slow release trace nutrient according to Claim 33, wherein the amount of said porosigen ranges from about 2.0 to about 12 parts by weight, and wherein the said cation release rate ranges from about 0.30 to about 1.1 weight percent of the total anion in said polymer matrix. 36. A slow release trace nutrient according to Claim 34, wherein the amount of said trace nutrien compound ranges from about 50 parts to about 100 parts, and wherein the amount of porosigen ranges from about 2.0 to about 12 parts by weight. 37. A slow release trace nutrient according to Claim 35, wherein said porosigen has a solubility of from about 0.1 to about 100 grams per 100 grams of water and is selected from the class consisting of the halogenated alkaline metals, the halogenated alkaline earth metals, halogenated nickel, halogena- ted iron, halogenated zinc, halogenated tin, halogena ted silver, ammonium bromide, ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, ammonium chlorate, ammonium chlorite, ammonium chloride, ammonium fluoride, ammonium sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbo- nate, sodium silicate, and silicon dioxide. 38. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 36, wherein said porosigen has a solubility of from about 0.1 to about 100 grams per 100 grams of water and is selected from the class -fϋRE OMPI consisting of the halogenated alkaline metals, the halogenated alkaline earth metals, halogenated nickel, halogenated iron, halogenated zinc, halogenated tin, halogenated silver, ammonium bromide, ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, ammonium chlorate, ammonium chlorite, ammonium chloride, ammonium fluoride, ammonium sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbo¬ nate, sodium silicate, and silicon dioxide. 39. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 37 f wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class con¬ sisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbo¬ nate, zinc oxide, zinc phosphate, zinc chlorate, zinc nitrate, the various hydrates of said zinc com¬ pounds, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, copper nitrate, copper phosphate, the various hydrates of said copper com¬ pounds, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, the various hydrates of said iron compounds, manga¬ nese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, manganese nitrate, the various hydrates of said manganese compounds, boric acid, sodium biborate, the various hydrates of said boron compounds, molyb- denum oxide, sodium molybdate, potassium molybdate, the various hydrates of said molybdenum compounds, cobalt sulfate, cobalt chlorate, cobalt nitrate, the various hydrates of said cobalt compounds, sodium selenate, selenium dioxide, selenium trioxide, selenium oxychloride, selenium disulfide, selenium sulfur oxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium nitrate, magnesium acetate, magnesium oxide, magnesium phosphate, magnesium sulfite, and the various hydrates of said magnesium compounds. 40. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 38, wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class con¬ sisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbo- nate, zinc oxide, zinc phosphate, zinc chlorate, zinc nitrate, the various hydrates of said zinc com¬ pounds, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, copper nitrate, copper phosphate, the various hydrates of said copper com- pounds, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, the various hydrates of said iron compounds, manga¬ nese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, manganese nitrate, the various hydrates of said manganese compounds, boric acid, sodium biborate, the various hydrates of said boron compounds, molyb¬ denum oxide, sodium molybdate, potassium molybdate, the various hydrates of said molybdenum compounds, cobalt sulfate, cobalt chlorate, cobalt nitrate, the various hydrates of said cobalt compounds, sodium selenate, selenium dioxide, selenium trioxide, selenium oxychloride, selenium disulfide, selenium sulfur oxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium nitrate, magnesium acetate, magnesium oxide, magnesium phosphate, magnesium sulfite, and the various hydrates of said magnesium compounds. 41. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 39, wherein said trace nutrien is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, iron chloride, iron "BU EA OMPI sulfate, iron oxide, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate, sodium selenate, magnesium carbonate, and _ ' magnesium sulfate. 42. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 40,wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate, sodium selenate, magnesium carbonate, and magnesium sulfate. 43. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 41, wherein said porosigen is selected from the class consisting of ammonium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate and sodium silicate. 44. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 42, wherein said porosigen is selected from the class consisting of ammonium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate and sodium silicate. 45. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 29, wherein said porosigen has a solubility of from about 0.1 to about 100 grams per 100 grams of water and is selected from the class consisting of the halogenated alkaline metals, the halogenated alkaline earth metals, halogenated nickel, halogenated iron, halogenated zinc, halpgenated tin, halogenated silver, ammonium bromide, ammonium car¬ bonate, ammonium bicarbonate, ammonium chlorate, ammonium chlorite, ammonium chloride, ammonium fluo¬ ride, ammonium sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, and silicon dioxide. 46. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 30, wherein said porosigen has a solubility of from about 0.1 to about 100 grams per 100 grams of water and is selected from the class consisting of the halogenated alkaline metals, the halogenated alkaline earth metals, halogenated nickel, halogenated iron, halogenated zinc, halogenated tin, halogenated silver, ammonium bromide, ammonium carbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, ammonium chlorate, ammonium chlorite, ammonium chloride, ammonium fluo¬ ride, ammonium sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate and silicon dioxide. 47. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 45, wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class con¬ sisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbo¬ nate, zinc oxide, zinc phosphate, zinc chlorate, zinc nitrate, the various hydrates of said zinc com¬ pounds, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, copper nitrate, copper / O OMMPPII phosphate, the various hydrates of said copper com¬ pounds, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, the various hydrates of said iron compounds, manga¬ nese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, manganese nitrate, the various hydrates of said manganese compounds, boric acid, sodium biborate, the various hydrates of said boron compounds, molyb¬ denum oxide, sodium molybdate, potassium molybdate, the various hydrates of said molybdenum compounds, cobalt sulfate, cobalt chlorate, cobalt nitrate, the various hydrates of said cobalt compounds, sodium selenate, selenium dioxide, selenium trioxide, selenium oxychloride, selenium disulfide, selenium sulfur oxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium nitrate, magnesium acetate, magnesium oxide, magnesium phosphate, magnesium sulfite, and the various hydrates of said magnesium compounds. 48. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 46, wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class con¬ sisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbo¬ nate, zinc oxide, zinc phosphate, zinc chlorate, zinc nitrate, the various hydrates of said zinc com- pounds, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, copper nitrate, copper phosphate, the various hydrates of said copper com¬ pounds, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, the various hydrates of said iron compounds, manga- nese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride. manganese nitrate, ' the various hydrates of said manganese compounds, boric acid, sodium biborate, the various hydrates of said boron compounds, molyb¬ denum oxide, sodium molybdate, potassium molybdate, the various hydrates of said molybdenum compounds, cobalt sulfate, cobalt chlorate, cobalt nitrate, the various hydrates of said cobalt compounds, sodium selenate, selenium dioxide, selenium trioxide, selenium oxychloride, selenium disulfide, selenium sulfur oxide, magnesium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium nitrate, magnesium acetate, magnesium oxide, magnesium phosphate, magnesium sulfite, and the various hydrates of said magnesium compounds. 49. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 47, wherein said trace nutrien is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper oxide, copper oxychloride, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate, manganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate, sodium selenate, magnesium carbonate, and magnesium sulfate. 50. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 48, wherein said trace nutrient is a compound selected from the class consisting of zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, zinc carbonate, zinc oxide, copper sulfate, copper carbonate, copper Oitfpj oxide, copper oxychloride, iron chloride, iron sulfate, iron oxide, manganese oxide, manganese sulfate., manganese chloride, boric acid, sodium biborate, molybdenum oxide, sodium molybdate, cobalt sulfate, sodium selenate, magnesium carbonate, and magnesium sulfate. 51. A slow release trace nutrient composi¬ tion according to Claim 49, wherein said porosigen is selected from the class consisting of ammonium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate and sodium silicate. 52. A slow release trace nutrient composi- tion according to Claim 50, wherein said porosigen is selected from the class consisting of ammonium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate and sodium silicate. 53. A method for slowly releasing a trace nutrient compound into soil having moisture, com¬ prising, applying said composition of Claim 1 to moist soil. 54. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 2. 55. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 3. 56. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 8. 57. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 9. 58. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition ' is the composition of Claim 10. 59. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 11. 60. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 12. 61. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 20. 62. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 21. 63. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 25. 64. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 26. 65. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 37. 66. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 38. 67. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 39. 68. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 40. 69. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 49. 70. A method according to Claim 53, wherein said composition is the composition of Claim 50.

Inventors: CARDARELLI N
Applicants: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS INC, ENVIRONMENTAL CHEM INC
Application year: 1980
Main classification: C05G3
IPC codes: A01M1, C05D9, C05G3, C08J9