METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR REDUCING COLD-END CORROSION

Abstract: The present invention is directed to a method of reducing the amount of corrosion due to sulfuric acid on metal parts at the cold-end of a combustion system and in contact with combustion gases derived from the combustion of sulfur-­ containing fuel, said method comprising adding to the com­ bustion gases an effective amount for the purpose of an addi­ tive comprising ethylene polyamine, optionally together with aliphatic water-soluble alkanolamine. The invention is also directed to a composition for use in such a method compris­ ing ethylene polyamine and aliphatic water-soluble alkanolamine.

Description: DESCRIPTION "METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR REDUCING COLD-END CORROSION" As is well known to boiler operators, sulfuric containing fuels present problems not only from a pollutional point of view, but also with respect to the life and operability of metallic equipment and parts which are in contact with the flue gases containing the sulfur by-products of combustion. While the problem will be discussed herein with respect to boilers, it should be understood that both the problem and its solution could apply to other systems, such as process furnaces. Upon combustion, the sulfur in the fuel is converted to sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxidv In the flue gas, sulfur trioxide and water vapor are in equilibrium with sulfuric acid. Below about 450 F, essentially all of the SO2 is converted to H2SO4 fcr typical flue gas compositions of oil fired boilers. The resulting sulfuric acid condenses upon metal surfaces which are at temperatures below the acid dewpoint Corrosion results from the attack of the condensed sul- furic acid on the metals. As can be appreciated, the greater the sulfur content-of the fuel, the more sulfuric acid will likely be produced. This is particularly the case in industria and utility operations where low grade oils are used fo:: combustion purposes. The basic area to which the present invention is directed is often referred to in the industry as the "cold-end" of a boiler. This area is generally the path in the -boiler system that the combustion gases follow after the gases have, in fact, performed their primly service of producing and/or superheating steam In larger boiler systems, the last stages through which the hot combustion gases flow include the enconomizer, the air heater, the collection equipment or electrostatic precipitator, and then the stack through which the gases are discharged. The present invention is drawn to the present inventor's discovery of ethylene polyamines optionally in combination with aliphatic, water-soluble alkanolgamines, as cold-end additives. It was determined that if this additive is fed, preferably in droplet form, and preferably as an aqueous solution, to the moving combustion gases upstream of the cold-end surfaces to be treated and preferably at a point where the gases are undergoing turbulence, it will travel along lath the gases as vapor and/or liquid droplets and deposit on the downstream cold-end surfaces It is understood that any reference to ethylene polyamine is intended to include mixtures of such compounds and any reference to alkanolamine is intended to include mixtures thereof. While a point of turbulence of the combustion gases is a preferred feed, point for the additive, a point of laminar gas flow could also be used, provided that suitable mechanical means are utilized to create a zone o!'relative turbulence for proper treatment distribution. For example, an increased number of spray nozzles may be suitably arranged within a gas flow conduit to provide adequate treatment distribution. The invention in addition to providing a method of reducing the anount of sulfuric acid corrosion of metal parts at the cold-end of a combustion system also provides a composition for such use which comprises (i) aliphatic, water-soluble alkanolamine, and (ii) ethylene polyamine. The term "ethylene polyamines', is intended to include hydrocarbon chains consisting of at least two amino groups connected by ethylene group(s). For example, the lowest homolog in the series would be ethylene diamine having the following structure: NH2 - CH2 - CH2 - NH2. Also for-examples a higher homolog in the series would be tetraethylenepentamine having the structure: HN-(CH2 - CH2 NH - CH2 - CH2 - NH2)2. In terms of a general formula, ethylene polyamines according to the present invention could best be described by the following: H2N - CH2 (-CH2 - NH - CH2-)n CH2 - NH2 (I) Since ethylene diamine is the lowest honolog in the series, the lower limit for n is 0. It is the present inventor's opinion that there is no upper limit for n in Formula I other than that based on the commercial availability of the material. In any event, the highest homolog tested was poly(ethylenimine) having the formula: - - C which material had an average molecular weight of about 50,000 to 100,000; and, therefore, n was about 1000 to 2500. While all of the compounds tested had ethylene groups connecting the amino groups, it is believed that other lower alkyl interconnecting groups could be used. For example, it is the present inventor's belief that trimethylene or tetramethylene groups are suitable equivalents for the ethylene group. However, preliminary testing has indicated that hexamethylene interconnecting groups are unsuitable for the purpose. Except for high molecular weight species which are highly viscous, the additive can be fed neat; however, an aqueous solution of additive is preferred. Pue to its high solubility in water, the concentration of actives in the aqueous solution could, of course, vary over a aide range, depending only on economics of handling and shipment and the characteristics of the feed system. For example, the additive could be shipped neat and diluted at the point of application. If dilution at the point of application is undesirable or not possible,, then the additive would be sent pre-diluted. Due to costs of shipment and handling, it would be undesirable to ship very dilute aqueous solutions. The preferred lower concentration limit would be about 5,ó actives on a weight basis, with the most preferred lower limit being about 15%. The upper concentration limit could approach 100%, however, about 6Wó represents the preferred upper limit. The additive is preferably added to the combustion gases upstream, in the direction of flow of the 'co::foust- ion gases through the conbustion system, of the metal parts, and may be added to the combustion gases at a point of turbulence or at a point of laminar flow. There are numerous well known methods available to the artisan for feeding the additive to the combustion gases. eer example, the additive may be added in droplet form, it may be added in aqueous form, it may be sprayed into the combustion gases. In one embodiment the additive could be sprayed at a point of turbulence of the combustion gases upstream of the problem area using any well known atomizing spray nozzle(s). However, precautions should be taken to ensure that the problem areas will encounter treated flue gas. For instance, if the problem area is located centrally within a flow conduit for the combustion gases, the spray should be directed into the conduit in such a manner as to ensure that a sufficient amount of additive is present in the centre of the conduit u?on reaching the location of the problem area. Thus, an axially located spray nozzle which sprays the additive in the same direction that the combustion gases flow would be recommended for such 3. centrally located problem area. While the additive could be fed neat an aqueous solution is preferred. The amount of additive used could vary over a wide range depev ing on the nature and severity of the problem to be solved and would be a function of the sulfur content of the oil. With respect to the ethylene polyamine, whether used above or together with an alkanolamine the particular species is also seen to be an important consideration with respect to feedrate. For example,for a fuel oil containing 1, sulfur, .05 mole of triethylenetetramine per barrel (m/bb1) of fuel oil consumed has proven to be efficacious; while only .0004 mole of high molecular weight poly(ethylenimine) per barrel of fuel oil consumed (m/bbl) was required to do the job. It is the inventor's opinion that the upper limit would depend only on econonic considerations. Accordingly, for fuel oil containing 1% sulfur (weight basis), the upper limit would be considered to be about 1 m/bbl based on economic considerations, with about 0.5 m/bb1 representing a preferred upper limit. The active alkanolamine could be fed in an amount as low as about 0.05 m/bbl. The preferred lower limit is about 001 mXbb1. Based on economic considerations, the amount of active alkanolamine could be as high as about 1 m/bbl, with about 0.75 m/bbl,'representing the preferred upper limit. Accordingly, the inventive additive is considered to comprise from about .0009 to about 0.95 m/bbl of ethylene polyamine and from about 0.05 to about 1 m/bbl of alkanolamine. The preferred relative proportions are from about 0.1 to about 0.5 m/bb1 ethylene polyanine and from about 0.1 to about 0.75 m/bbl alkanolamine. Based on economic considerations, the total amount of active additive should not exceed about 1.1 m/bbl. The tenperature of the combustion gases at the point of feed is typically about 400 F to 750 F, but this rung, could widen depending on the gas temperature at the furnace exit. The drawings (Figs. 1 to 5) accompanying the present application, which illustrate the invention are all graphs drawing the degree of corrosion using various naterials- at various conditions. EXAMPLES Example 1 In order to assess the efficacy of the materials of the invention,various tests were conducted using a D-type boiler manufactured by Keeler. The boiler is rated at 2±,OOO pounds of steal per hour and is normally operated at 200 psig pressure Since the primary function of a cold-end additive is to eliminate or reduce corrosion caused by the condensation of sulfuric acid, techniques that measure corrosion were expected to yield the most direct infor- mation about product performance. Accordingly, the well knows method of quantifying the reduction in corrosion of a stainless steel air-cooled probe was used for determining efficacy as cold-end additives. The probe used was similar to a standard British Central Electricity Research Laboratories (CERL) acid deposition probe. The construction and operation of this probe are well knots in the art as evidenced by an article entitled "An Air-Gooled Probe for Measuring Acid Deposition in Boiler Flue Cases" by P.A0 Alexander, R. S. Fielder, P.J. Jackson and E. Raask, page 31, Volume 38, Journal of the Institute of Thiel; which article is hereby incorporated by reference to indicate the state of the art. Flue gas constituents were allowed to condense on the probe for 45 minutes. The probe was then immediately washed with doubly distilled water and analyzed for iron and sulfate. Corrosion was measured by analyzing the probe washings for water soluble iron, which is also a eil known technique. Since a col-nd additive could be capable of travelling along with the combustion gases and deposit ing on the downstream cold-end surfaces to be treated, the various additives tested were sprayed, using a standard atomizeing spray nozzle arrangement, into the combustion gases at a point of turbulence located upstream of the air-cooled probe. Immediately before base loading, the boiler was taken tbrough a soot blowing cycle, and the burner tip was manually cleaned. The boiler was then base loaded for one hour prior to initiating testing. Fuel oil of precisely the same composition was fired over a given period of time to ensure reproducibility of baseline data throughout the period. However, for critical testing, daily determination of baseline data is recommended. The boiler was fired with number 6 grade fuel oil containing 17; sulfur (by weight). The oil was preheated to 170 F and atomized with steam. Conbustion air was at ambient temperature. Flue gas temperatures at the sampling point ranged from 4400F to 4800F. The sulfuric acid dewpoint using either a Land Dewpoint Meter or a corrosion probe was typically 262 F. Using a Research Appliance Corporation sampling device, the concentration of S03 was determined to be about 7 parts per million parts of combustion gas (ppm, on volume basis). Twe materials tested were ethylene diamine, available from Union Carbide; diethylenetriamine, obtained from Fisher; triethylenetetramine, obtained from Aldrich; tetraethylenepentamine, obtained from Aldrich; poly (ethylenimine), also obtained from Aldrich, and ethyl amine, obtained from Pennwalt. The results of a series of tests are reported below in Table 1, wherein a different test number indicates that tests were conducted on a different day. The f 02 reported is the oxygen content of the combustion gas on a volume basis9 The additive feedrates are reported as mole(s) of feed per barrel of fuel oil consumed (mole/bbi), and the probe corrosion results are reported as % reduction in iron content of the probe washings for the indicated temperatures as com- pared to base condition corrosion. TABLE 1 Additive @ Steam Load Feedrate % Reduction in (Fe) Test Additive % O2 (pph x 10+3) (mole/bbl) 190 F 200 F 210 F 230 F 250 F 1 diethylenetriamine 5.3 13.0 .43 89 96 93 56 2 diethylenetriamine 6 13.5-14 .13 60 52 73 0 ethylamine 6 13.5-14 .12 0 Very Corrosive 3 diethylenetriamine 6.0 14.5-15.5 .31 88 87 88 75 triethylenetetramine 6.0 14.5-15.5 .34 93 96 94 75 4 triethylenetetramine 6.0 15.5-16.5 .054 21 42 40 46 5 diethylenetriamine 6.0 14.5-15.5 .088 0 27 0 6 triethylenetetramine 6.0 14.5-15.5 .066 33 49 54 40 7 triethylenetetramine 6.0 13-14 .06 25 42 40 75 8 triethylenetetramine 6.0 14-15 .081 40 53 57 43 9 triethylenetetramine 6.0 14-15 .09 40 41 49 66 10 diethylenetriamine 6.0-6.2 15 .12 27 45 31 0 triethylenetetramine 6.0-6.2 15 .084 0 21 31 0 tetraethylenepentamine 6.0-6.2 15 .055 13 52 48 0 11 triethylenetetramine 6.0 15.5-17 .09 46 78 49 77 As can be seen from Table 1, the ethylene polyamines tested were quite effective in reducing the corrosion of the test probe. On the other hand, ethylamine tested, which is known as a neutralizing agent for SOx gases in wet scrubbers, was ineffective. It was, accordingly, the present inventor's conclusion that the ethylene polyamines are effective cold-end additives while ethylamine is not. The accompanying drawings are graphic representations of test results comparing various ethylene polyamines, as indicated below, to base conditions. In Figure 1 are reported the results of tests comparing di ethylenetri amine and tri ethyl enet etramine to base conditions. As can be seen from the figure, the results are graphically reported as a plot' of concentration of iron in the probe washings, in ppm, against the sampling temperature in F. The results for base conditions are represented by circles, the results for diethylenetriamine are represented by squares, and the results for triethglenetetramine are represented by triangles. During the test period, the boiler was operated at approximately 14,000 pounds of steam per hour with oxygen being 6% of the flue gas. The additives were both fed at a rate of 0.33 mole per barrel of oil consumed (0.33 m/bb1). Ag can be seen from Figure 1, the ethylene polyamines did indeed significantly reduce corrosion as compared to base conditions. In Figure 2 are reported the results of tests comparing ethylene diamine and poly(ethylenimine) to base conditions. The polyCethylenimine) has a molecular weight average of about 50,000 to 100,000 such that n in Formula I above would be about 1000 to 2500. As can be seen from the figure, the results are graphically reported as a plot of concentration of iron in the probe washings, in ppm, against the sampling temperature F. The results for base conditions are represented by solid circles, the results for ethylene diamine are represented by solid squares, and the results for poly(ethylenimine) ) are represented by solid triangles. During the test period, the boiler was operated at approximately 12,000-13,000 pounds of steam per hour with oxygen being about 6% of the flue gas. The ethylene diamine was fed at a rate of 0o38 moleXbb1 of fuel oil consumed, and the poly(ethylenimine) was fed at a rate of 36.3 milliliters per barrel of oil consumed. Due to the uncertainty of the exact molecular weight of the poly(ethylenimine), no exact molar feedrate was calculable, Rowever, based on the noted molecular weight range for the material and a density of approximately 1 gram per milliliter, the feedrate was about .0004 to .0007 mole/bbl. As can be seen from Figure 2, the ethylene polyamines did indeed significantly reduce corrosion as compared to base conditions. Example 2 In order to assess the efficacy of the alkanolamines, tests were conducted using the D-type boiler described in Example 1 above. The well knoll method of quantifying the reduction in corrosion of the above-described air-cooled probe was again used for determining efficacy as cold-end additives. Flue gas constituents were allowed to condense on the probe for 45 minutes. The probe was then immediately washed with doubly distilled water and analyzed for iron and sulfate. Corrosion was measured by analyzing the probe washings for water soluble iron. The various additives tested were sprayed, using a standard agonizing spray nozzle arrangement, into the combustion gases at a point of turbulence located upstream of the air-cooled probe. Immediately before base loading, the boiler was taken through a soot blowing cycle, and the burner tip was manually cleaned. The boiler was then base loaded for one hour. Fuel oil of precisely the same composition must be fired over a given period of time to ensure reproducibility of baseline data throughout the period. However, for critical testing, daily determination of baseline data is recommended. The boiler was fired with number 6 grade fuel oil containing 1% sulfur (by weight). The oil was preheated to 1700F and atomized with steam. Combustion air was at ambient temperature. Flue gas temperatures at the sampling point ranged from 440 F to 4800F. The sulfuric acid dew point using either a Land Dew Point meter or a corrosion probe was typically 262 F. Using a Research Appliance Corporation sampling device, the concentration of SO3 was determined to be about 7 parts per million parts of combustion gas (ppm, on volume basis). The oxygen content of the flue gas was kept at about 6'ó. The materials tested were monoethanolamine, obtained from Fisher; 2-(ethylamiho)ethanol, obtained from Fisher; 3-amino-I -propanol, obtained from Eastman; 2-amino-2methyl-1 propanol, obtained from INC; 2-dibutyl-amino- ethanol, obtained from Eastman; 2-amino-2-ethyl-I '3- propanediol, obtained from Aldrich; I-amino-2-propanol, obtained from Eastman; triethanolamine, obtained from Batman; and diisopropanolamine, obtained from Dow, The results of a first series of tests are reported below in Table 2, wherein a different test number indicates that tests were conducted on a different day. The additive feedrates are reported as mole(s) of additive per .barrel of oil consumed m/bbl), and the probe corrosion results are reported as % reduction in iron content of the probe washings for the indicated temperatures as compared to base condition corrosion. Negative results indicate a condition of increased corrosion of the probe as compared to base conditions0 The steam loads are reported as pounds per hour (pph)° TABLE 2 CORROSION INHIBITION OBTAINEO WITH A NUMBER OF ALKANOLAMINES % Reduction in Fe vs. @ Steam Load Mole of Additive/ Temperature, F Test Additive (pph x 103) bbl. of Oil Consumed 205 215 225 235 1 2-(ethylamino)-ethanol 11-12 1.0 95 93 95 92 3-amino-1-propanol 11-12 1.0 97 95 96 93 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol 11-12 1.0 96 93 92 88 2-dibutyl-aminoethanol 11-12 1.0 60 48 45 23 2 2-(ethylamino)-ethanol 11-13 0.5 58 50 44 35 3-amino-1-propanol 11-13 0.4 48 41 36 30 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol 11-13 0.3 6 -15 -33 -49 3 2-amino-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol 12.5-13.8 0.4 67 55 51 48 1-amino-2-propanol 12.5-13.8 0.4 35 34 35 26 diethanolamine 12.5-13.8 0.4 62 53 49 38 As can be seen from the results reported in Table 2, a variety of alkanolamines demonstrated cold-end additive efficacy. The results of a second series of tests are reported below in Table 3, wherein a different test number indicates that tests were conducted 6n a differed° day. The additive feedrates are reported as mole per barrel of oil consumed (mole/bb7), and the corrosion results are reported as % reduction in iron content of the probe washings for the indicated temperatures. These test results are seen to demonstrate the ability of the alkanolamines tested to reduce cold-end corrosion. TABLE 3 Additive Steam Load Feedrate % Reduction in (Fe) Test Additive (pph x 103) (mole/bbl) 190 F 200 F 210 F 230 F 250 F 1 N-aminoethyl ethanolamine 11 - 11.5 0.88 94 65 42 27 2 monoethanolamine 11.5 0.84 85 74 33 0 3 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol 13.0 0.42 58 47 25 Corrosive 4 monoethanolamine 13.0 0.46 56 52 38 Corrosive 5 monoethanolamine 13.5-14 0.12 36 40 42 0 N-amineothyl ethanolamine 13.5-14 0.12 39 11 51 0 triethanolamine 13.5-14 0.13 25 -24 18 0 6 monoethanolamine 13 - 14 0.39 74 48 50 0 7 monoethanolamine 13 - 14 0.34 83 75 72 69 8 monoethanolamine 13.5-14.8 0.34 25 36 Corrosive 9 diisopropanolamine 13.5-14.8 0.36 23 C O R R O S I V E 10 monoethanolamine 14.2-15.5 0.31 46 36 36 31 2-ethylamino ethanol 14.2-15.5 0.31 41 27 26 0 N-aminoethyl ethanolamine 14.2-15.5 0.33 79 78 87 73 monoethanolamine 14.2-15.5 0.31 46 36 36 31 11 2-dibutylaminoethanol 15 - 16 0.37 40 27 12 Corrosive 12 3-amino-1-propanol 13.5-14.5 0.36 43 13 24 0 1-amino-2-propanol 15.5-16.5 0.27 38 0 C O R R O S I V E Having thus established the efficacy, individually, of ethylene polyamine and aliphatic, water soluble alkan- olamine as cold-end additives, the efficacy of combined treatments was evaluated in a further series of tests. Indeed, it is considered highly desirable to be able to combine the individual additives on an optimized cost basis. Furthermore, depending on the particular problem to be treated,it may be desirable to combine the additives to take advantage of the respective strengths of each and/or to possibly supplement the relative weaknesses of each. The results of this further series of tests are reported in the accompanying drawings which contain graphi@ representations comparing various combinations of the ethylene polyamine and alkanolamine to base conditions. The materials tested were monoethanolamine (MEA), obtained from Fisher, and triethylenetetramine (TETA), obtained from both Fisher and Aldrich. Example 3 Using the same testing procedures as described in Example 2 above, the efficacy of the combined treatment was evaluated. The results of these tests are reported in Figures 3 and 4 as plots of concentration of iron in the probe washings, in ppm, against sampling temperature B. These tests results are to be interpreted according to the following legend presented in Table 4 below; ; TABLE 4 Legend For Figures 2 and 3 Moles of MEA/ Moles of TETA/ Total Moles of Amine/ Total Moles of Amine/ Figure Symbol bbl of Oil bbl of Oil bbl of Oil 2 Solid Circle 0 0 0 2 Solid Square 0.58 0 0.58 2 Open Square 0.45 0.022 0.472 2 Open Triangle 0.152 0.065 0.217 2 Solid Triangle 0 0.0858 0.0858 3 Solid Circle 0 0 0 3 Open Circle 0.382 0.0366 0.419 3 Open Triangle 0.257 0.054 0.311 Example 4 Tbe efficacy of various combined treatasents was evaluated in tests using a boiler at a well-known oil refinery. The test procedures were generally the same as described in Example 2 above. The boiler was manufactured by Riley. During the tests, the boiler produced between 12g,000 and 155,000 pounds of steam per hour, and it was baseloaded durings each experiment. The generated steam was near 700 F at 600 psig pressure. Flue gas temperatures at the location of the corrosion probe ranged from 6850F to 7200F. The materials tested were IDEAS and TETA, both obtained from Union Carbide. The results of these tests are reported in Figures 5 and 6 as plots of concentration of iron in the probe washings, in ppm, against sampling temperature (0F). For Figure 5, the sulfur content of the fuel oil was 0.69%, and for Figure 6, it was 0.43%. These tests results are to be interpreted according to the following legend presented in Table 5 below. Based on the results reported above in Tables 1-3 and Figure 1, which results are seen to demonstrate the efficacy, individually, of aliphatic, water-soluble alkanolamine and ethylene polyamine, and the results reported in Figures 2-5, a treatment composition comprising those materials in combination is seen to have efficacy as a cold-end additive. From Figure 2 it can be seen that the product represented by the open triangle was' more effective than either constituent alone. The mole ratio of the ethylene polyamine to alkanolamine for that product was about ### ## #. 2.3 to 1. In addition to efficacy as a cold-end additive, preliminary evidence has indicated that reduction of fouling on cold-end surfaces may be an added benefit of using the described materials0 TABLE 5 Legend for Figures 4 and 5 @ Moles of MEA/ Moles of TETA/ Total Moles of Amine/ Figure Symbol bbl of Oil bbl of Oil bbl of Oil 4 Open Circle 0 0 0 4 Open Triangle 0 0.088 0.088 4 Open Hexagon 0.141 0.062 0.203 5 Open Circle 0 0 0 5 Open Square 0.131 0.058 0.189 5 Open Triangle 0.0873 0.0387 0.126

Claims: CLAIMS 1. A method of reducing the amount of sulfuric acid corrosion of metal parts at the cold-end of a combustion system and incontactwith combustion gases derived from the combustion of sulfur containing fuel, said method comprising adding to the combustion gases an effective anount for the purpose of an additive comprising ethylene polyamine of the general formula H2N - CH2 (-CH2 - NH - CH2-)n CH2 wherein n is O or an integer. 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the combustion system is a steam generating system and the fuel is sulfur-containing oil. 3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2 wherein said additive is an aqueous solution of ethylene polyamine which is added to said combustion gases at the rate of about from .0001 to 1.0 mole per barrel of fuel consumed. 4. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein said combustion gases flow along a path at the coldend of the combustion system from a first zone of relative turbulence to a second zone at which said metal parts are located, wherein said additive comprising in combination: -(i) aliphatic, amter-soluble alkanolamine, and (ii) at least one member of the group consisting of ethylene polyamines of the formula given in claim 1 said additive travelling along with said combustion gases as vapor and/or liquid droplets from said zone of relative turbulence to said second zone and deposit on said metal parts. 5. A method as claimed in claim 4; wherein said ethylene polyamine is added in an amount of from about .0004 to about .95 moles per barrel of fuel consumed, and wherein said alkanolamine is added in an amount of from about 0.05 to about 1 mole por barrel of fuel consumed. 6. h method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the total amount of additive does not exceed about 1.1 mole per barrel of fuel consumed. 7. A method as claimed in any of claims 4 to 6, wherein said ethylene polyamine is EMI22.1 in the amount of O.065 mole per barrel of fuel consumed, and wherein said alkanolamine is EMI22.2 in the amount of 0.217 mole per barrel of fuel consumed. 8. A cold-end additive composition for reducing the amount of sulfuric acid corrosion of metal parts at the cold-end of a combustion system in contact with combustion gases derived from the combustion of sulfurcontaining fuel, said composition comprising in combin ation: (i) aliphatic, water-soluble alkanolamine, and (ii) ethylene polyanine of the formula defined in claim 1. 9. A composition as claimed in claim 8, wherein the alkanolamine is monoethanolamine. 10. A composition as claimed in claim 8 or 9, wherein the ethylene polyamine is triethylenetetranine. 11. A composition as claimed in claim 10, wherein the mole ratio of triethylenetetramine to monoethanolamine is about f.) to 1.

Inventors: SUJDAK, RICHARD J.
Applicants: BETZ EUROPE, INC.
Application year: 1979
Main classification: C23F11
IPC codes: C23F11