FLOWABLE DEFOLIANT AND DESICCANT COMPOSITION AND ITS USE

Abstract: Novel herbicide and pesticide formulations in flowable form are disclosed and are prepared by combining with aluminum hydroxide gels.

Description: Flowable Toxfflcant Composition and Its Use as Herbicide or pesticide Priority: July 17, 1978, U.S.A., No. 925 l94 Field of the Invention This invention relates to aluminum hydroxide flowable gel pesticide and herbicide compositions and to the preparation thereof and its use. Background of The Invention Commercially available herbicide and pesticide formulations are generally in the form of wettable powders, dusts or granules. However, such formulations are not always desirable as they present problems in handling of the formulations and are particularly irritating to the grower-user. Moreover, many herbicide and pesticide active ingredients are difficult to suspend and thus do not lead to easily produced formulations of the type mentioned. In addition, in the past certain active ingredients that are insoluble organic acids were formed as dialkylamine salts.in order to obtain the necessary suspension cf the product. However, such dialkylamine salts have the po rential of forming highly undesirable nitroso amine derivatives in the enviroment. It is, therefore, highly desirable to obtain herbicide anC. pesticide formulations which avoid one or more of these disadvantages of prior art formulations. Moreover, it would also be advantages to provide such new and improved herbicide and pesticide formulations which, in addition to avoiding one ,r more of the prior art problems, also leads to formulations tnat may possess one or more additional advantages over the prior art formulations. Summary of The Invention It has now been discovered that new and improved flowable herbicide and pesticide formulations may be formed by combining the active ingredients of suitable particle size with aluminum hydroxide gels. It has been found that such aluminum hydroxide gel herbicide and pesticide formulations in audition to elimi noting one or more of the disadvantages of prior art formulations also provides formulations that may possess one or more of he following advantages. Formulations of this invention when compared to prior art formulations have been shown to possess superior suspending properties, improved crop tolerance, im proved control of selected weed species, better handling characteristics than dry dusty wettable powders, an environmental safety advantage over emulsifiable concentrates containing volatile organic carriers and enhanced desiccation-defoliation action thereby reducing the amount of pesticide required as a harvest aid. Details of The Invention A broad range of navel herbicide and pesticide formulatlxns in flowable form are provided according to this invention by mixing the active ingredients of suitable particle size with aluminum hydroxide gels. The formulations of the invention are generally prepared by incorporating the appropriate quantity of the active ingredient along with any desired freeze thaw agent, water, and suitable wetting, dispersing and antifoam agents into any suitable mill, or homogenizer such as, for example, an attitor or ball mill, where the ingredients are intimately and homogeneously mixed and the particle size of the herbicide or pesticide is reduced to the desirable particle size range, generally from about 2 to about 5 microns average particle diameter The nix- ture, Qf desired particle size, is then removed from the mill and aluminum hydroxide gel combined therewith with mixing to yield a generally fluid, homogeneous, very slow settling suspension. Alternatively, the aluminum hydroxide gel can, if desired, be added directly to the mill for a brief period after the correct toxicant particle size is reached. Generally aluminum hydroxide gel, containing approximately about 2 to about 20%, preferably about 10 to about 15% by w tht aluminum hydroxide, is employed as the suspending agent at a concentration range of about 5 to about 30%, preferably about 15 to about 25% by weight. The aluminum hydroxide gel can be used as the sole suspending agent or in combination with other suspending agents, such as for example, methylcellulose,hydroxy propyimethylcellulose, magnesium hydroxide gel, bentonite, Veegum, attapulgite clays, hydroxypropyl guar and the like. The aluminum hydroxide concentration in compositions of this invention are generally in the range of about 0.10 to about '.o% by weight aluminum hydroxide (that is, about 0.065 to about 3.9Z by weight A1203). Any suitable freeze thaw agent can be employed in the flowable compositions of this invention and is generally present in an amount of from about 1 to about 10% by weight. Among such suitable freeze thaw agents there can be mentioned, fe example, urea, polyhydric alcohols such as glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, glucose, sucrose and the like as well as water soluble non-toxic polymeric agents such as dextran, polyvinylpyrrolidone and the like. Preferred for use in the compositions of this invention is propylene glycol. Any suitable wetting and dispersing agents may be used in the flowable compositions of this invention and is gener- ally employed in an amount of from about 1 to about 67. by weight. Exemplary of suitable wetting and dispersing agents there can be mentioned, for example, non-ionic aromatic polyethylene glycol ethers, such as Antarox A-400, alkyl aryl polyether alcohol type emulsifiers such as Triton X-100, sulfonated purified lignins such as Reax 45A and Reax 45L and a fine mesh, high viscosity, hyproxypropyl guar such as Jaguar HP-8 and the like. Suitable antifoam agents when employed are used in an amount of from about 0.1 to about 0.5% by weight. Any suitable antifoam agent can be employed such as, for example, a 509it by weight solution of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7diol known as Surfynol 104-E. As examples of herbicides and pesticides that may be employed in formulations of this invention there may be mationed for example, atrazine, ammonium thiocyanate, bifenox, propachlor, 2,4-D, dicamba, metribuzin, carbaryl and the like.Itwill be appreciated that the foregoing examples are merely exemplary of the many herbicidal and pesticidal active ingredientsthatmay be formulated in the compositions of this invention. In the formulations of this invention the active ingredient will generally be present in an amount of from about o.o6 to about 0;72 g and preferably about 0.36 to 0.6 g of active ingredient per gallon of formulation. The compositions can also comprise such additional substances as other herbicides, pesticides, such as insecticides, nematocides, fungicides, and the like; stabilizers, spreaders, deactivators, adhesives, stickers, fertilizers, activators, synergists, and the like. That is, the compositions of the present invention are also useful when other herbicides, pesti cides and/or defoliants, dessicants, growth regulants, and the like are included in the herbicidal and pesticidal compositions heretofore described. These other materials can comprise from about 5% to about 95% of the active ingredients in the herbicidal compositions. Use of combinations of these other herbicides, pesticides, and/or defoliants, dessicants, etc. with the compounds of the present invention provide herbicidal compositions which are more effective in controlling weeds and often provide results unattainable with separate compositions of the individual herbicides and pesticides. The other herbicides, dafliants, desiccants and plant growth regulants which can te used a Pompos^'tsons of this invention can include chloro p',enoxy herbicides such as 2,4,5-T, MCPA, MCPB, 4(2,4-DB), 2,4-DEB, 4-CPB, 4-CPA, 4-CPP, 2,4,5-TB, 2,4,5-TES, 3,4-DA, silvex and the like; carbamate herbicides such as IPC, CIPC, swep, barban, BCPC, CEPC, CPPC, and the like; thiocarbamate and dithiocarbamate herbicides such as CDEC, metham sodium, EPTC, diallate, PEBC, perbulate, vernolate and the like; subsuituted urea herbicides such as norea, siduron, dichloral urea, chloroxuron, cycluron, fenuron, monuron, monuron TCA, diuron, linuron, monolinuron, neburon, buturon, trimeturon and the like; symmetrical triazine herbicides such as simazine, chlorazine, atratone, desmetryne, norazine, ipazine, prometryne trietazine, simetone, prometone, propazine, ametryne and the like; chloroacetamide herbicides such as alpha-chloro-N, Ndimethylacetamide, CDEA, CDAA, alpha-chloro-N-isopropylacetamide, 2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide, 4-(chloracetyl)morpho line, l-jchloroaeetyl) piperidine, and the like; chlorinated aliphatic acid herbicides such as TCA, dalapon, 2,3-dichloropropionic acid, 2,2,3-TPA and the like; chlorinated benzoic acid and phenylacetic acid herbicides such as 2,3,6-TBA, 2,3,5,6-TBA, tricamba, amiben, fenac, PBA, 2-methoxy-3,6dichlorophenylacetic acid, 3-methoxy-2,6-dichlorophenylacetic acid, 2-methoxy-3,5,6-trichlorophenylacetic acid, 2,4-dichloro3-nitrobenzoic acid, sodium 5-t2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethy1)- phenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoate and the like; and such compounds as aminotriazole, maleic hydrazide, phenyl mercuric acetate, endothal, biuret, technical chlordane, dimethyl 2,3,5,6-tetra chloroterephthalate, diquat, erbon, DNC, DNBP, dichlobenil, DPA diphenamid, dipropalin, trifluralin, solan, dicryl, merphos, DMPA, DSMA, MSMA, potassium azide, acrolein, benefin,bensu)ide AMS, bromacil, 2(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4,-oxaldiazolidine-3,5-dione, bromoxynil, cacodylic acid, CMA, CPMF, cypromid, DCB, DCPA, dichlone, diphenatril, DMTT, DNAP, EBEP, EXD, HCA, ioxynil, IPX, isocil, potassium cyanate, MAA, MAMA, MCPES, MCPP, MH, molinate, NPA, OCH, paraquat, PCP, picloram, DPA, PCA, pyrichlor, sesone, terbacil, terbutol, TCBA,brorninil CP-50144, H-176-1, H-732, M-2901, planavin, sodium teiaborate calcium cyanamide, DEF, ethyl xanthogen disulfide, sindone, sindone B, propanil and the like. Such herbicides and pesticides can also be used in the compositions of this invention in the form of their salts,esters amides and other derivatives whenever applicable to the par2cu- lar parent compounds. When pesticides and herbicides are used in their free acid form they bind to the alumina suspending agents. These canposi- tions then control the release of active ingredients. Addi- tionally, such a flowable system provides a unique liquid carrier and suspension system which obviates the need for the preparation of dialkylamine salts which have the potential of forming undesirable nitroso amine derivatives. Moreover, when formulated as a flowable composition of this invention the active ingredient will generally exhibit improved herbicidal or pesticidal performance over use of the free acid according to prior art compositions. As examples of formulations according to this invention reference may be had to the following illustrative examples. EXAMPLE 1 A flowable carbaryl formulation was prepared in the following manner. Into a 2.7 1 stainless steel ball mill filled to about one half its volume with 9.5 mm diameter, steel balls were added the following ingredients: 240 g carbaryl, 11 g Reax 45L a lignosulfonate wetting/dispersing agent, 11 g propylene glycol, 0.5 g Surfynol (Trademark by Airco Chemicals and Plastics, U.S.A.) 104-E antifoam and 175 g water. The mill was sealed, the mixture was milled for four hours and the suspension drained from the grinding media. The carbaryl particle size in the formulation had been reduced to 3.6 microns, average particle diameter. To the 380 g of recovered suspension were added 83.3 g of aluminum hydroxide gel and the mixture blended for a few minutes to obtain a fluid, homogeneous suspension. After standing for 4 months, the suspension had about 10% supernatant but the bulk contained no appreciable sediment and a gentle mixing with a stirring rod produced a fluid homogeneous suspension. EXAMPLE 2 The following ingredients were added to an Attritor recirculating mill, model Q-1, containing 3.2 mm stainless steel balls as grinding media: 6722 g bifenox technical, 599 g Reax 45A, 299 g propylene glycol,30g Surfynol ldWE antRnm and 4613 g water. Milling was allowed to continue for 4 1/2 hours after which time the desired particle size was achieved as determined by microscopic examination. Aluminum hydroxide gel, 2690 g, was added to the mill and blended into the formulation for 15 minutes. The final flowable suspension contained by weight: 45% bifenox, 4.0% Reax 45A, 2.0% propylene glycol, 18% aluminum hydroxide gel, 0.2% Surfynol 104-E and 30.8% water. EXAMPLE 3 In a manner similar to Example 1, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid was prepared in a flowable suspension form. In this formulation only 1.4% Reax 45A were used while the concentrations of the other ingredients, except for water, were the same as that for Example 1. EXAMPLE 4 In a manner similar to Example 1, atrazine was formulated into an active flowable herbicide suspension. In this case the premilled atrazine was combined with the other ingredients in a suitable blender and the Reax 45L content was 2% by w tht. EXAMPLE 5 Propachlor was formulated similar to Example 1 except for a considerably longer milling time of about 32 hours. The toxicant concentration was 38% by weight, due to the additional water required to thin the suspension to the proper fluidity. EXAMPLE 6 An ammonium thiocyanate-aluminum hydroxide composition was prepared by mixing ammonium thiocyanate dissolved in water with aluminum hydroxide gel to give a final composition con taining by weight, 45% ammonium thiocyanate, 37% aluminum hydroxide gel and 18% water. This composition can be made to a thicker consistency and improved suspension, if desired, by the incorporation of appropriate thickening agents such as methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or various clays such as bentonite or attapulgite or the hydroxypropyl g.ar Jaguar HP-8 (Trademark by Stein, Hall & Co., New York, ). EXAMPLE 7 Metribuzin was formulated into a flowable suspension by combining the appropriate ingredients in an Attritor mini, model 01, and reducing the metribuzin particle size to about 3 microns average particle diameter. After removing the material from the mill, aluminum hydroxide gel was added and blended to obtain a fluid, homogeneous suspension. The flow able suspension contained by weight: 45% metribuzin, 4.0 Reax 45A, 2.0% propylene glycol, 0.2 Surfynol 104-E, 18% aluminum hydroxide gel and 30.8% water. EXAMPLE 8 In a manner similar to Example 7, dicamba was prepared in a flowable suspension. In this case the particle size was reduced to about 5 microns and the aluminum hydroxide gel was added directly to the mill. The final composition was 40% dicamba, 77o related acids of dicamba, 4.5Z wetting, dispersing and antifoam agents, 16% aluminum hydroxide gel, 27. propylene glycol and 30.5% water. Examples of three especialy prefered formulations of this invention are set forth in the following two examples. EXAMPLE 9 Abrazine Flowable Formulation Component Weight % Atrazine 45% Reax 45A 2 Propylene glycol 2 Aluminum hydroxide gel (10% Al2O3 assay) 18 Surfynol 104-E 0.1 Water 32.9 100.0 EXAMPLE 10 Cerbaryl Flowable Formulation Component Weight% Carbatyl 45% Reax 45@ 2 Component Weight % Propylene glycol 2 Aluminum hydroxide gel (10°/o A1203 assay) 18 Surfynol 104-E 0.1 Water 32.9 100.0 EXAMPLE 11 Ammonium Thiocyanate Formulation Component Weight % Annnonium Thiocyanate 45% Aluminum hydroxide gel 18 (10/o A1203 assay) Jaguar HP-8 0.5 Water 36.5 100.0 Weeds are undesirable plants growing where they are not wanted, having no economic value, and interfering with the production of cultivated crops, with the growing of ornamental plants, or with the welfare of livestock. Many types of weeds are known, including annuals such as pigweed, lambsquarters, foxtail, crabgrass, wild mustard, field pennycress, ryegrass, goose-grass, chickweed, wild oats, velvet leaf 1 purselane, barnyard grass, smartweed, knotweed, cocklebur, wild buckwheat, kochia, medic, corn cockle, ragweed, sowthistle, coffee-weed, croton, cuphea, dodder, funitory, groundsel, hemp nettle, knowel, spurge, spurry, emex, jungle rice, pondweed, dog fennel, carpetweed, morning glory, bedstraw, duck salad and naiad; biennials such as wild carrot, matricaria, wild barley, campion, chamomile, burdock,' mullein, roundleaved mallow, bull thistle, hounds-tongue, moth mullein, and purple star thistle; or perennials such as white cockle, perennial rye-grass, quackgrass, Johnson grass, Canada thistle, hedge bindweed, Bermuda grass, sheep sorrel, curly dock, nutgrass, field chickweed, dandelion, campanula, field bindweed, Russian knapweed, mesquite, toadflax, yarrow, aster, gromwell, horsetail, ironweed, sesbania, bulrush, cattail and wintercress. Similarly, such weeds can be classified as broadleaf or grassy weeds. It is economically desirable to control the growth of such weeds without damaging beneficial plants or livestock. The new compositions of this invention are particularly valuable for weed control because they are toxic to many species and groups of weeds while they are relatively nontoxic to many beneficial plants. The exact amount of composition required will depend on a variety of factors, including the hardiness of the particular weed species, weather, type of soil, method of application, the kind of beneficial plants in the same area, and the like. Thus, while the application of up to only about one or two ounces of active compound per acre may be sufficient for good control of a light infestation of weeds growing under adverse conditions, the application of 10 pounds or more of an active compound per acre may be required for good control of a dense infestation of hardy perennial weeds growing under favorable conditions. The toxicity of the compositions of this invention can be illustrated by many of the established testing techniques known to the art, such as pre- and post- emergence testing. The activity of the compositions of this invention can be demonstrated by experiments carried out for the pre- and post- emergence control of a variety of weeds. In these experiments the following test procedures were used. Greenhousc Studies Pre-emergence: A specially prepared soil of a good loam mix, high in nutrients and containing 2.6% organic matter is used. A uniform amount1 0.907 kg, of the dry soil is placed in flats which present 929.03 cm2 of surface area. The soil is tamped with a grooved pallet which provides five lines of indentation in which the appropriate seeds are placed. 0.454 kg of soil is distributed evenly over the seeds and tamped level so that all flats have a uniform amount of com- paction. 400 ml of water is then added to the flats which are set aside to allow for a uniform moisture distribution. The test compositions are made up and adjusted so as to provide the dosages indicated in terms of active ingredients in kg/ha. All sprays were done in dilutions of 449.43 1 per ha. Spraying is done with a precision endless belt sprayer. The flats are removed to the greenhouse and scored as indicated for each material. Flats are watered as required. Post-emergence: The crops and weeds were planted in the same potting soil as described for the pre-emergence. Three inch pots were used and planting was staggered to permit the crops and weeds to be the size and age at the time of spraying, as one would experience in the field. Chemical treatments were calculated in terms of pounds active ingredients per acre and diluted to 449.43 1 per ha. The plants were placed in a carrier tray and treated in the precision endless belt sprayer. The pots were removed to the greenhouse and scored as indicated. Plants were watered as required. Field Studies: Both Pre- and Post-emergence field plot studies were conducted on a soil type which is a good agricultural loam with some clay. The land was prepared in the usual fashion of plowing, discing and harrowing, The latter was a "spiketooth" type and additional harrowing was done to the preemergence area to assure a very flat uniform surface. Pre-emergence: Crops and weeds were planted by use of a Planet, Jr. single row hand planter. The test area was divided into three banks 3.96 m in width with D.61 m aantbns between each bank. The individual plots were then marked out perpendicular to the planted rows. Each bank contained 24pk*s which were 1.07 m wide. Actual treatments were based upon a 76.2 x 30.5 mm pit b allow 152.4 mm between plots in case of drift or overspray. Treatments were made up at the dosages indicated for the apappropriate material and diluted to an application rate of 449.43 1 per ha. A compressed air tank sprayer was used when the total volume was applied uniformly to each plot. This employed a separate propellant tank so that the liquid tank could be agitated during the spraying to permit homo ity of the mix. Each treatment was applied once in each bank. The first bank was systemized while the second and third bank were randomized. Post-emergence: These plots were on a much larger scale than the pre-emergence, in that each bank was 12.2 m wide. This field had laid fallow for three years so a heavy weed infestation was assured. Plots were set up in 2.44 m widths perpendicular to the crops with the same systernizedtmridanizel plot location usedas with the pre-emergence test. Spraying was done 21 days following planting when the crops and weeds were in a stage where normal post-emergence treatments would occur. As with the other tests the chemicals were made up at the dosages indicated in terms of active ingredients in pounds per acre and applied in 449.43 1 of water per ha. The application equipment was a Tractor mounted precision discrete dosage sprayer with pressure supplied by a P.T.O. driven roller pump. A pressure by-pass tank return hose to the mix tank provides continuous agitation. The spray boom provided for a uniform 1.83 m 'spray swath, with scoring taken from the 1.52 m width between the tractor tire tracks. Scoring: The rating system used in scoring phytotoxicity found in the testing program is based upon visual observations and rated on the basis of where 0 = NO visible effect to 10 = total plant kill. Generally speaking, a 2 or less to a crop is considered "trace" damage and is usually acceptable to the user and an 8 or more represents economic control. More specifically: Numeric Value . Description 0 0 = No plant injury. 1-2 T = Trace of injury. No serious reduction in the production capability of the crop or com petitive growth potential of the weeds. 3-4 L r Light plant injury. Includes slight areas of burning, slight deformation of leaf (ves), slight chlorosis or slight dwarfing effect from which plant recovers. 5-7 M 8 Moderate plant injury. Plant of poor or no market value as a result of injury. This would include killing of terminal bud, moderate areas of plant burning or chlorosis, deformation of one or more expanding leaves, or pro nounced dwarfing effect. 8-9 H = Heavy plant injury. Plant of no value as a result of spray application. This would include any generalized damage to a major portion of the plant. 10 D = Death of plant. A 10 however. usually refers to top-kill. The possibility existe e that a plant appears dcd and is rated 10 while growth may reappear from the soil level showing a lower rating at a After date. Statistical Treatment of Data: Due to inherent biological variability, each plant is, to some degree, different from every other plant and each plot is different from every other plot. The best method to overcome this is to make repetitive applications of each treatment (one chemical at one dosage on one crop), score each replicate, determine each treatment mean (average) and subject the results to a statistical analysis to determine if the treatments are statistically different. In experiments conducted the activity of flowablealurn1 hydroxide gel formulations of atrazine, ammonium thiocyanate, 2,4-D, propachlor and bifenox of this invention were compared to prior art commercially available formulations, namely,Aatex 4L, technical ammonium thiocyanate, Amine 400, Ramrod 80% W.P. and Modown respectively and in many instances found to be superior. For example in the experiments conducted according to the aforedescribed procedures a flowable atrazine formulation aoxrd- ing to this invention Example 9, was found to possess superior herbicidal properties against giant foxtail at an application rate of 1.121 and 2.242 kg/ha in pre-emergence, greenhouse tests when scoring was done at six weeks, against pigweed at an application rate of 1.121 kg/ha in pre-emergence,field tests when scoring was done at 11 days, against venice mallow at an application rate of 1.121 kg/ha . in pre-emergence, field tests when scoring was done at 11 days and six weeks, against foxtail at an application rate of 2.242 kg/ha in post-emergence, greenhouse tests when scoring was done at six Jets and against velvet leaf at an application rate of 1.121 and 2.242 kgXha in post-emergence greenhouse tests when scoring was done at 5 days. Likewise, a flowable 2,4-D formulation according to this invention, Example 3, was found to possess superior herbicidal activity against morning glory at an application rate of 0.56 and o.28 kg/ha in post-emergence, field tests when scoring was done at 8 days. Additionally, a flowable bifenox formulation of this invention, Example 2, was found to possess superior herbicidal activity against morning glory at an application rate of ).36 kg/ha in pre-emergence, greenhouse tests when scoring was done art 10 days. In a defoliation study of ammonium thiocyanate for cotton, cotton plants were sprayed in a precision endless belt sprayer at dosages indicated in 449.43 1 of water per ha. The plants were removed to the greenhouse and scored for defoliation (true leaf abscission and dropping) and desiccation (leaf dehydration and sticking) at 7 and 14 days following treatment. A final scoring for regrowth was made on the 25th day. Scoring is in terms of percent of defoliation, desiccation, total damage and regrowth The ammonium thiocyanate formulation of Example 11 gave superior defoliation and desiccant activity compared to techni cal ammonium thiocyanate in that it gave 100% total activity at a dosage of 560 kg/ha with only 10% regrowth whereas the technical amonium thiocyanate at 560 kg/ha gave only 30% total activity with 83 regrowth.

Claims: What I claim is: 1. A flowable toxicant composition comprising an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of a herbicide or a pesticide and from about 5 to about 3O%by weight aluminum hydroxide gel. 2. The composition of claim 1 wherein there is present a freeze thaw agent, a wetting and a dispersing agent. 3. The composition of claim 2 wherein there is present an antifoam agent. 4. The composition of claim 3 wherein the freeze thaw agent is present in an amount of from about 1 two about 10% by weight and is selected from urea, glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol polyethylene glycol,glucose, sucrose, dextran and polyvinylpyrrolidone. 5. The composition of claim 4 wherein the wetting and dispersing agent is present in an amount of from about 1 to about 6% by weight and is selected from non-ionic aromatic polyethylene glycol ethers, alkylaryl polyether alcohols and sulfonated purified lignins. 6. The composition of claim 5 wherein the antifoam agent is present in an amount of from about 0.1 to about 0.5% by weight. 7. The composition of claim 6 wherein the antifoam agent is a 50% by weight solution of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn- 4,7-diol. 8. The composition of claim 1 wherein the particle size of the active ingredient is from about 2 to about 5 microns average particle diameter. 9. The composition of claim 8 wherein the active ingredient is selected from the group consisting of atrazine, ammonium thiocyanate, bifenox (e.g. produced by Mobil Oil Inc.), propachlor, 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid), dicamba, metribuzin and carbaryl. 10. The composition of claim 8 wherein the active ingredient is present in an amount of from about o.o6 to about 0.72 g/ml of composition. 11. The composition of claim 8 which is Component Weight % Atrazine 45% Reax 45A 2 Propylene glycol 2 Aluminum hydroxide gel (102/o A1203 assay) 18 Antifoam agent 0.1 Water 32.9 100.0 12. The composition of claim 8 which is Component Weight % Carbaryl 45% Reax 45L 2 Propylene glycol 2 Aluminum hydroxide gel (10% A1203 assay) 18 Antifoam agent 0.1 Water 32.9 100.0 13. The composition of claim 8 which is Component Weight % Ammonium thiocyanate 45% Aluminum hydroxide gel 18 (10% A1203 assay) Jaguar HP-8 (Hydroxypropyl 0.5 guar) Water 36.5 100.0 14. Use of the compositions according to each of the claims 1 to 13 as herbicides or pesticides.

Inventors: KAUFMAN, HAROLD A.
Applicants: J.T. BAKER CHEMICAL CO.
Application year: 1979
Main classification: A01N25
IPC codes: A01N25