HERBICIDAL COMPOSITIONS WHICH CONTAIN A THIOCARBAMATE AND AN ORGANOPHOSPHOROUS COMPOUND AND THEIR APPLICATION

Abstract: Herbicidally active thiocarbamates are employed in combination with organophosphorothioates, the latter in suf­ ficient qualtity to prevent soil degradation of the former. As a result, the herbicidal effectiveness of the thiocarbamate is significantly enhanced and prolonged, rendering a single application of the herbicide effective over a longer period of time.

Description: Background of the Invention This invention relates to herbicidal compositions and methods of use. In particular, this invention relates to herbicidal compositions comprising an herbicidally active thiocarbamate in combination with an organophosphorus compound, the latter serving to prolong the effectiveness of a single application of the thiocarbamate herbicide in controlling undesired plant growth. Thiocarbamates are well known in the agricultural art as herbicides useful for weed control in crops such as corn, potatoes, beans, beets, spinach, tobacco, tomatoes, alfalfa, and others. Thiocarbamates are primarily used in pre-emergence application. They have been found to be particularly effective when incorporated into the soil prior to the planting of the crop. As a herbicide, the thiocarbamate is mrst concentrated immediately after its application. How long thereafter the initial concentration is retained depends in large part on the particular soil used. Thus the rate at which the thiocarbamate herbicide concen traction declines following its application tends to vary from one type of soil to the next. This is evident both in the observable extent of actual weed control and in the detectable presence cf undegraded thiocarbamate remaining in the soil after con ,iderable time has elapsed. It has now been discovered that the soil persistence of certain herbicidally active thiocarbamates is significantly extended by the incorporation of certain organophosphorus compounds, which have no herbicidal activity of their own, into the herbicide formulation. This improvement in the soil persistence of the thiocarbamates manifests itself in a variety of ways. It can be shown, for example, that the rate of decrease of the thiocarbamate content of the soil is substantially lessened with the use of the organophosphorus compound. This is evidenced by soil analyses taken at regular intervals following application of the thiocarbamate herbicide. Improved soil persistence is also shown by herbicidal efficacy tests, wherein the degree of weed injury is measured after a set period of time following application of the herbicide. In such a test, the organophosphorus compound, which has no herbicidal activity of its own, is shown to increase the herbicidal effectiveness of the thiocarbamate by increasing the persistence of the latter in the soil, and thus prolonging its effective life. Other ways in which the effect manifests itself will be evident from the following description. Brief Description of the Invention This invention relates to a novel herbicidal composition comprising (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI2.1 in which R1 is C1-C alkyl, C -c alkenyl, C7-Cg phenyl 1 6 . . 3 6 . . 7 9 . . alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substituted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and Rê and R are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; and (b) an amount of an organophosphorus compound having the formula EMI3.1 in which R4 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 alkynyl, or C5-C7 cycloalkyl, and is optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylthio, R5 is C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, or C1-C4 alkylthio, R6 is C1-C10 alkyl, C2-C10 alkenyl, or C2C4 alkynyl, optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, nitro, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylthio, C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or -(R7)m-# in which R7 is C1 C4 alkyl, C2 C4 alkenyl, or C2- C4 alkynyl, optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo and cyano, m is zero or one, and is phenyl optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, trifluoromethyl, nitro, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, C1-C3 carbalkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylsulfinyl, X is oxygen or sulfur, and Y is oxygen or sulfur, sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the compounds mentioned above are defined such that R1, R2, and R3 are as defined above, R4 is C1-C4 alkyl, R5 is selected from the group consistirrg of C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, and C1-C4 alkylthio, R6 is selected from the group consisting of phenyl, chlorophenyl, nitrophenyl, C7-Cg alkyl sulfinylphenyl, C7-C9 phenylalkyl, and C2-C6 alkylthioalkyl, X is oxygen or sulfur, and Y is oxygen. In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, the compounds are defined such that R1, R2, and R3 are as defined above, R4 is C1-C4 alkyl, R5 is selected from the group consisting of C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, and C1-C4 alkylthio, R6 is selected from the group consisting of phenyl, chlorophenyl, nitrophenyl, C7-C9 alkylsulfinyl- phenyl, and C2-C6 alkylthiophenyl, X is oxygen or sulfur, and Y is oxygen. In a still further preferred embodiment of the invention, the compounds are defined such that R1 is C1-C6 alkyl, 3 R2 and R are independently C1-C6 alkyl, R4 is C1-C4 alkyl, R5 is selected from the group consisting of C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, and C1-C4 alkylthio, R6 is selected from the group consisting of phenyl, chlorophenyl, nitrophenyl, C7-Cg alkylsulfinyl phenyl, and C2-C6 alkylthiophenyl, X is oxygen or sulfur, and Y is oxygen. This invention further relates to a method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying the above composition to the locus where control is desired. As used herein, the terms "alkyl," "alkenyl " "alkynyl1,, and "alkylene" are intended to include both straight-chain and branched-chain radicals. All carbon atom ranges are intended to be inclusive of their upper and lower limits. The term "halogen atom" is used to designate fluorine, chlorine, bromine, or iodine atoms, as well as any combination thereof. The term "herbicide", as used herein, means a compound which controls or modifies the growth of plants. By the term "herbicidally effective amount" is meant an amount of compound which causes a modifying effect upon the growth of plants. By "plants" is meant germinant seeds, emerging seedlings and established vegetation, including roots and above-ground portions. Such controlling or modifying effects include all deviations from natural development, for example, killing, retardation, defoliation, desiccation, regulatinn, stunting, tillering, stimulation, leaf burn, dwarfing and the like. The phrase "to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate" is used herein to denote the effect whereby the molecular structure and/or herbicidal effectiveness of the thiocarbamate is maintained in substantially the same form it assumed when first applied to the locus. An extended soil life can be manifest in a slower rate of decline of weed-killing potency, or an increased half-life of thiocarbamate concentration in the soil. Other techniques of determining the soil life can be readily apparent to one skilled in the art. Detailed DescriPtion of the Invention According to the present invention, the abovedescribed organophosphorus compound is added to the thiocarbamate in order to prolong the molecular integrity and herbicidal effectiveness of the latter. As the examples below indicate, there is no critical range of the ratio of these two components. The soil-life-extending effect is observable over a broad range of ratios. It is most convenient, however, to apply the compounds at a ratio of from about 0.1:1 to about 50:1 (thiocarbamate:organophosphorus). Preferably, the ratio ranges from about 1:1 to about 25:1, and most preferably from about 1:1 to about 15:1. Thiocarbamates which are useful in the present invention include S-ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate, S-ethyl hexahydro-lR-azepine-l-carbothioate, S-ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate, S-n-propyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate, S-ethyl ethylcyclohexylthiocarbamate, S-n-propyl ethyl-n-butylthiocarbamate, S-p-chlorobenzyl diethylthiocarbamate, S-2,3,3- trichloroallyl diisopropylthiocarbamate, S-2,3-dichloroallyl diisopropylthiocarbamate, and S-benzyl di-sec-butylthiocarbamate. Organophosphorus compounds which are useful in the present invention include O-ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioate, O-ethyl-S-p-chlorophen-yl ethylphosphonodithioate, O,O-diethyl-S-ethylthioethyl phosphorodithioate, O,O-diethyl- O-p-methylsulfinylphenyl phosphorodithioate, O,O-diethyl-S- ethylthiomethyl phosphorodithioate, O,O-dimethyl-O-p-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate, O,O-diethyl-O-p-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate, O,O-dimethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate, 0,0diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate, O,O-diisopropyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate, O,O-dimethyl-O-benzyl phosphorothioate, o ,O-diethyl-O-(2-phenylethyl) phosphorothioate, O,O-di-npropyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate, O-ethyl-S-ethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate, O,O-di-n-propl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate, and O-methyl-S-phenyl methyl phosphdnodithioate. Further examples are listed in the test data shown below. The usefulness of many thiocarbamates as herbicides can be significantly broadened to include a wider variety of crops by the inclusion of an antidote in the herbicide formulation. The antidote protects the crop from injury by the herbicide, increasing the tolerance of the crop for the herbicide. The herbicide is thus rendered more selective in its action, retaining its potency against the undesired weeds, while showing a decreased herbicidal effect against the desired crop species. For antidote descriptions and methods of use, reference is made to U.S. Patent No. 3,959,304, issued to E.G. Teach on May 25, 1976; U.S. Patent No. 3,989,503, issued to F.M. Pallos et al. on November 2, 1976; U.S. Patent No. 4,021,224, issued to F.M. Pallos et al on May 3, 1977; U.S. Patent No. 3,131,509, issued to O.L. Hoffman on May 5, 1964; and U.S. Patent No. 3,564,768, issued to O.L. Hoffman on February 3, 1971. Useful antidotes include acetamides having the formula EMI7.1 in which n is 1 EMI7.2 <tb> or <SEP> 2, <SEP> and <SEP> R8 <SEP> and8R9 <SEP> are <SEP> independently <SEP> Cl-Cl2 <tb> alkenyl, <SEP> or <SEP> -N/R9 <SEP> represents <SEP> the <SEP> group <tb> <SEP> 7CH2H-R12 <tb> <SEP> R <SEP> \11 <tb> <SEP> R <tb> alkyl or C2-C12 in which R10 and Rill are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and methyl, and R12 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C1-C4 alkyl, and phenyl. Examples of antidotes falling within the above formula are N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide and N,N-diallyl chloroacetamide. An example falling outside the above formula is 1,8-naphthalic anhydride. The antidote is applied in conjunction with the thiocarbamate and the organophosphorus compound in a nonphytotoxic antidotally effective amount. By "non-phytotoxic" is meant an amount of the -antidote which causes at most minor injury to the desired crop species. By "antidotally effective" is meant an amount of the antidote which substantially decreases the extent of injury caused by the thiocarbamate to the desired crop'species. The preferred ratio of herbicide to antidote is from about 0.1:1 to about 30:1. The most preferred range is from about 3:1 to about 20:1. The following examples are offered to illustrate the compositions, methods, and effectiveness of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the invention in any way. EXAMPLE 1 Soil Persistence Tests This example shows, by periodic chemical analyses of soil composition, the effectiveness of the organophosphorus compounds of the present invention in extending the soil life of the thiocarbamate herbicides. A one-pint (0.5 liter) glass canning jar containing 250 grams (g) of soil (on an air-dry basis) was used for each test. Soils of three different textures were used: a loamy sand fron Sunol, California; a silty loam from Thurman, Iowa; and a loam from Tracy, California. The relative amounts of sant, silt, and clay of each soil type were determined by mechanical means, and the quantity of organic matter and the acidity (pH) were determined chemically. The results of these analyses are shown below: TABLE I Soil Analyses Composition (Weight °/O) Organic Matter Source Sand Silt Clay (Weight °/O) sH Sunol, CA 64 29 7 4 6.8 Thurman, IA 32 56 12 3 7.2 Tracy, CA 50 30 20 4.7 6.1 The test compounds or combinations were dissolved in water at concentrations calculated such that a 5.0 cubic centimeter (cc) aliquot contained quantities of active ingredients equivalent to the desired application rates when added to the jar. The thiocarbamates used in these tests were applied in the form of emulsifiable liquid concentrates containing an antidote to prevent crop injury. The concentrates were appropriately diluted to correspond to an application rate of 6.0 lb/A (6.72 kilograms/hectare) of active ingredient. Of the organophosphorus compounds tested, O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorodithioate was applied as a technical liquid diluted for an application rate of 0.5 lb/A (0.56 kilograms/hectare) or 1.0 lb/A (1.12 kilograms/hectare), and O-ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioate was applied as an emulsifiable liquid concentrate diluted for an application rate of 4.0 lb/A (4.48 kilograms/hectare) of active ingredient. Thus, a 5.0 cc aliquot of an aqueous mixture, containing the thiocarbamate, the antidote, and the organophosphorus additive in appropriate concentrations, was transferred by pipette to the jar and incorporated into the soil with a spatula. The jar was then sealed with a lid and shaken manually for approximately thirty seconds. Following such treatment, the soil was seeded with approximately fifty barnyardgrass chinochloa crusgalli) seeds and two seeds of DeKalb XL-45A corn. The soil was then moistened to field capacity and the jar was placed unsealed in a greenhouse where the temperature was maintained at approximately 70 to 800F (21 to 270 C) and the soil was moistened periodically. The tests were performed in duplicate and a separate jar was used for each test. After a specified interval, two jars were removed from the greenhouse, stripped of their foliar plant material, sealed tightly, and frozen to await chemical analysis. After an additional interval, a second pair was removed and similarly treated. In all, six such pairs for each application rate were prepared for analysis, including one pair taken immediately after treatment with the test chemicals for use as a control. Each prePared sample was macerated with 2.0 liters of water in a Waring Blender, then transferred to a 4.0 liter flask. Approximately 10.0 milliliters (ml) of an anti-foaming agent was added. The mixture was distilled rapidly, and approximately 400 ml of distillate was collected. Five drops of concentrated hydrochloric acid were added to the distillate to suppress emulsion formation. The thiocarbamate was extracted from the distillate with two 2.0 ml portions of isooctane. The extracts were then combined for analysis for thiocarbamate content by gas chromatography. In Tables II and III, the chromatogram data has been converted to equivalent soil concentrations in parts per million (ppm) by weight of thiocarbamate. These tables list the results as averages for each pair of duplicates. The tables clearly show that the thiocarbamate content declined with time in each type of soil tested. They further show that such decline was substantially lessened by the presence of the organophosphorus compound. The effect of the organophosphorus compound on the Sunol soil is particularly evident from 21 days on in Table II and from three weeks on in Table III, by comparison of the experimental entries with the control. The higher figures for the experimental entries are a clear indication that the rate of decline is substantially decreased due to the presence of the organophosphorus compound. A similar effect on the Tracy soil is evident from three days on in Table II and from one week on in Table III. Finally, a similar effect is observed in the Thurman soil from seven days on in Table II and from two weeks on in Table III. TABLE II Soil Persistence Test Results Herbicide : S-ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate (active ingredient) in 12:1 weight ratio with N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide (antidote) Application Rate : 6.0 1b/A Amount of Herbicide Present in Seil (ppm active ingredient) (a) Days Following Application 0 3 7 14 21 28 Organophosphorus Additive Application Seil used: from Sunol, California Rate (1b/A) None (control) - 11.71 9.97 7.88 6.12 0.76 0.71 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 0.5 11.43 10.25 8.41 6.88 5.38 2.28 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 1.0 12.10 10.23 10.91 6.79 5.74 3.95 O-Ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioate 4.0 10.36 11.70 8.05 5.17 3.18 1.04 Seil used: from Tracy, California None (control) - 10.59 2.58 0.24 0.12 0.00 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 0.5 12.05 9.05 7.26 0.82 0.41 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 1.0 12.02 10.04 7.58 1.23 0.38 O-Ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioate 4.0 10.24 9.54 1.48 0.30 0.00 Seil used: from Thurman, Iowa None (control) - 15.79 8.75 0.40 0.27 0.22 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 0.5 12.24 9.38 5.87 0.51 0.43 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 1.0 12.68 10.88 9.26 0.55 0.39 O-Ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioate 4.0 11.47 8.88 4.29 0.24 0.18 (a) Each figure shown represents the average of two samples. (b) Dashes represent samples not analyzed. TABLE III Soil Persistence Test Results Herbicide : S-ethyl-diisobutylthiocarbamate (active ingredient) in 24:1 weight ratio with N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide (antidote) Application Rate : 6.0 1b/A Amount of Herbicide Present in Seil (ppm active ingredient) (a) Weekt Following Application 0 1 2 3 4 5 Organophosphorus Additive Application Seil used: from Sunol, California Rate (1b/A) Nona (control) - 9.00 7.30 6.15 3.35 0.68 0.30 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 1.0 9.40 7.10 6.55 5.25 5.18 3.65 Seil used: from Tracy, California None (control) - 8.05 1.25 0.13 0.17 0.07 0.03 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 1.0 7.95 7.45 6.05 5.65 4.84 0.66 Seil used: from Thurman, Iowa None (control) - 8.35 7.00 0.16 0.11 0.07 0.07 O,O-Diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate 1.0 8.35 7.10 4.90 2.11 1.18 0.37 (a) Each figure shown represents the average of the two samples. EXAMPLE 2 Herbicidal Activity Improvement Tests This example offers herbicidal activity test data to show the effectiveness of the organophosphorus additives in improving the herbicidal activity of thiocarbamates. The effect is observed by comparing the extent of weed control in test flats treated with a thiocarbamate against that occurring in similar flats treated with both the thiocarbamate and an organophosphorus compound. As in Example 1, the thiocarbamate used in this test was applied in the form of an emulsifiable liQuid concentrate containing 6 lb/gal (0.72 kg/l) active ingredient. In several of the tests as indicated, an antidote was included in the formulation to prevent crop injury. The organophosphorus compounds were primarily used in technical form, although emulsifiable liquids, granules, and microcapsules were also used, as indicated. Stock solutions were prepared by adding appropriate amounts of the formulated test chemicals to 100 cc mixtures containing equal parts of water and acetone. Five cc of a stock solution was then added to three pounds of soil con taining approximately 5% moisture in a 5-gallon (18.9 liter) rotary mixer where the soil and stock solution were mixed for 10 to 20 seconds. The soil was then placed in aluminum flats which were 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) deep, 3.5 inches (8.9 cm) wide, and 7.5 inches (19.0 cm) long. The soil was tamped and leveled with a row marker to impress six rows across the width of the flat. The test weeds varied from test to test and included the following: CODIO: N'4t SCIENTIFIC NAME yellow foxtail Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb. barnyardgrass Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv. milo Sorghum bicolor (L.) .'oench barley Hordeum vulgare (L.) giant foxtail Setaria faberi Herrm wild cane Sorghum bicolor (L.) Noench (variant ot milo) Corn was also planted in some of the tests The corn used was DeKalb XL-45A corn of species Zea mays (L.). Sufficient seeds were planted to produce several seedlings per inch in each row. The flats were then placed in a greenhouse maintained at 70 to 850C and watered daily by sprinkler. Three weeks after treatment, the degree of weed control and corn injury were estimated and recorded as percentage control compared to the growth of the same species in an untreated check flat of the same age. The rating scale ranges from 0 to 100%, where 0 equals no effect with plant growth equal to the untreated control, and 100 equals complete kill. The tables which follow list the results of these tests. A control experiment is included in each table for comparison. Substantial improvements in average percent weed control over the control experiment are evident in each table at all application rates of the organophosphorus additive. While all the data in any single table was obtained at the same time under the same conditions, variations exist from one table to the next due to the difficulty in duplicating environmental conditions on different dates. The variations are also due to the fact that different weed combinations and/or soils were used. On the whole, however, it is clear that herbicidal efficacy of the thiocarbamate three weeks after application was much improved by the use of the organophosphorus additive. TABLE IV Herbicidal Activity on Barley, Barnyardgrass, Milo and Giant Foxtail Herbicide : S-Ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate as 6 lb/gallon emulsifiable liquid contain ing, where shown, N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide antidote in 12:1 weight ratio Application Rate : 3.0 1b/A Soil Source :: Tracy, California Evaluation Time : 3 weekt after treatment Without Antidote With Antidote Organophosphorus Additive Application Average % % Corn Average % % Corn Rate (1b/A) Weed Control Injury Weed Control Injury None (Control) - 65 0 58 0 O-Ethyl-S-phenyl athylphosphono- 0.5 92 60 95 0 dithioate (4E) (a) 1.0 100 100 100 20 2.0 100 80 100 0 4.0 100 100 99 0 O-Ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphono- 0.5 97 90 78 0 dithioate (10G) (b) 1.0 100 80 81 0 2.0 100 80 88 0 4.0 100 90 99 10 O-Ethyl-S-p-chlorophenyl 0.5 81 0 ethylphosphonodithioate (4E) 1.0 90 20 2.0 100 75 4.0 100 80 O-Ethyl-S-p-chlorophenyl 0.5 66 0 ethylphosphonodithioate (10G) 1.0 84 0 2.0 82 30 4.0 96 60 TABLE IV (continued) Without Antidote With Antidote Organophosphorus Additive Application Average % % Corn Average % % Corn Rate (1b/A) Weed Control Injury Weed Control Injury 0,0-Diethyl-S-ethylthioethyl 1.0 80 20 phosphorodithioate (technical) 2.0 85 40 4.0 87 50 0,0-Diethyl-0-p-methylsulfinylphenyl 1.0 96 60 phosphorodithioate (technical) 2.0 100 95 4.0 100 90 0,0-Diethyl-S-ethylthiomethyl 1.0 97 75 phosphorodithioate (technical) 2.0 98 90 4.0 98 80 0,0-Dimethyl-0-p-nitrophenyl 1.0 98 70 phosphorothioate (technical) 2.0 95 70 4.0 100 90 (a) 4E: emulsifiable liquid containing 4 lb/gal active ingredient. (b) 10G: granular formulation containing 10% by weight active ingredient. TABLE V Herbicidal Activity on Yellow Foxtail, Barnyardgrass and Will Cane Herbicide : S-Ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate as 6 lb/gal emulsifiable liquid Application Rate : 3.0 lb/A Evaluation Time : 3 weeks after treatment Tracy, CA Soil Thurman IA Soil Organophosphorus Additive Application Average % % Corn Average % % Corn Rate (1b/A) Weed Control Injury Weed Control Injury None (control) - 4 0 14 0 0,0-Dimethyl-0-phenyl phosphorothioate (technical) 0.5 18 0 16 0 1.0 26 0 34 0 2.0 30 0 44 0 0,0-Diethyl-0-phenyl 0.5 48 0 38 0 phosphorothioate (technical) 1.0 81 0 76 0 0,0-Diisopropyl-0-phenyl 0.5 40 0 30 0 phosphorothioate (technical) 1.0 42 0 46 0 2.0 56 0 58 0 0,0-Di-n-propyl-0-phenyl 0.5 30 0 44 0 phosphorothioate (technical) 1.0 50 0 50 0 2.0 86 0 81 0 0,0-Dimethyl-0-benzyl 1.0 32 0 32 0 phosphorothioate (technical) 2.0 54 0 38 0 0,0-Diethyl-0-(2-phenylethyl) 1.0 32 0 32 0 phosphorothioate (technical) 2.0 46 0 32 0 TABLE VI Herbicidal Activity on Yellow Foxtail, Barnyardgrass, Milo and Wild Cane Herbicide : S-Ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate as 6 1b/gal emulsifiable liquid Application Rate : 3.0 1b/A Evaluation Time : 3 weeks after treatement Soil Source : Tracy, CA. Average % Weed Control Organophosphorus Additive Application Rate (1b/A): 0 0.125 0.25 0.50 1.0 2.0 (control) 0-Ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioate (technical) 20 - 49 72 90 93 0,0-Diethyl-0-phenyl phosphorothioate (technical) 20 88 91 94 96 0,0-Diethyl-0-phenyl phosphorothioate (microcapsule) 20 89 93 94 95 0,0-Dimethyl-0-phenyl phosphorothioate (technical) 20 32 54 72 87 - TABLE VI Herbicidal Activity on Yellow Foxtail, Barnyardgrass, Milo and Wild Cane Herbicide : S-Ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate as 6 1b/gal emulsifiable liquid Application Rate : 3.0 1b/A Evaluation Time : 3 weeks after treatement Soil Source : Tracy, CA. Average % Weed Control Organophosphorus Additive Application Rate (1b/A): 0 0.50 1.0 2.0 4.0 0,0-Diethyl-0-phenyl phosphorothioate (technical) 22 60 62 82 92 0-Ethyl-S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioate (technical) 22 8 16 24 28 0-Methyl-S-phenyl methylphosphonodithioate (technical) 22 12 8 8 12 0,0-Diethyl-0-(2-phenylethyl) phosphorothioate (technical) 22 14 20 46 64 0,0-Di-n-propyl-0-phenyl phosphorothioate (technical) 22 38 50 70 84 0-Ethyl-S-ethyl-0-phenyl phosphorothioate (technical) 22 36 56 76 90 EXAMPLE 3 Accelerated Soil Persistence Tests The tests shown in this example are similar to those of Example 1, except that the soil was pre-treated to magnify and accelerate its effect in causing the herbicide content to decline. The soil from Sunol, California, described in Example 1 was used in all tests. A. Soil Pre-Treatment A solution was prepared by diluting an emulsifiable liquid concentrate containing 6 lb/gal (0.72 kg/l) of the herbicide S-ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate in 100 ml of water, such that the resulting concentration of herbicide in the solution was 4000 mg/l. Five ml of this solution was then added to 10 lb (4.54 kg) of soil and the mixture was mixed in a rotary mixer for 10-20 seconds. The soil was then placed in round plastic containers, 9 inches (22.9 cm) in diameter by 9 inches (22.9 cm) deep. The soil was tamped and leveled with a row marker to impress three rows across the width of each container. Two rows were seeded with DeKalb XL-45A corn (Zea mays), and one row was seeded with barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crwsgal1i) Sufficient seeds were planted to produce several seed; per row. The containers were then placed in a greenhouse maintained at 20 C to 300C and watered daily by aprtrwkLer. Five weeks after treatment, the soil was allowed to dry out and the plant foliage was removed, The soil was then passed through a 0.25 inch (0.64 em) screen to remove plant roots and clods, and then passed through a 2 millimeter (mm) screen. B. Soil Persistence Test A 100-gram quantity (air-dry basis) of the pre treated soil was placed in an8 ounce (0.24 liter) wide-mouth glass bottle. The same emulsifiable concentrate described in Part A above was appropriately diluted in water such that a 5 ml portion added to the soil would produce a herbicide concentration of 6 ppm (weight) in the soil. A selected extender compound in technical (nonformulated) form was then diluted in an acetone-water mixture such that a one ml portion added to the soil would produce a concentration of 4 ppm (weight). On these bases, the herbicide and extender were added to the bottle containing the soil. The bottle was then sealed with a lid and shaken manually for approximately 15 minutes. Following such treatment, the soil was moistened with 20 ml deionized water. The bottle was then covered with a watch glass to maintain aerobic conditions and to prevent rapid soil drying, and placed in a controlled environmental chamber in darkness, where the temperature was maintained at 250C. Two days later, the bottle was removed from the environmental chamber and 50 ml of water and 100 ml of toluene were added. The bottle was then tightly sealed with a lid containing a cellophane liner, and vigorously shaken on a variable speed, reciprocating shaker (Eberback Corp. Model No. 6000) set at approximately 200 excursions per minute for one hour. After shaking, the bottle contents were allowed to settle, and a 10 ml aliquot of toluene was transferred by pipette into a glass vial and sealed with a polyseal cap. The toluene extract was analyzed for herbicide content by gas chromatography. The chromatogram data was then converted to equivalent soil concentrations in parts per million (ppm) by weight of the herbicide. The results are shown in Tables VIII, IX, and X, which represent three separate pre-treatment batches. Two control runs are included in each table (where the herbicide was applied alone). In each case, substantially more herbicide remains in the soil when an extender compound is present. TABLE VIII 2-Day Soil Persistence di-propylthiocarbamate Herbicide: S-Ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate Application Rates: Herbicide 6 ppm (weight) Extender 4 ppm (weight) Herbicide alone: Trial A EMI22.1 0.22#Residue <tb> 0.23# <tb> R4-Y <SEP> S <tb> <SEP> # <tb> R5# <SEP> P-X-R6 <tb> After 2 Days (ppm) Trial B Herbicide with Extender: EMI22.2 Cmpd. <SEP> Herbicide <SEP> Residue <tb> <SEP> No. <SEP> R4-Y- <SEP> R5- <SEP> -X-R6 <SEP> After <SEP> 2 <SEP> Days <SEP> (ppm) <tb> <SEP> 1 <SEP> (CH3)2CHCH2O- <SEP> (CH3)2CHCH2O- <SEP> -SCH2Cl <SEP> 3.05 <tb> <SEP> 2 <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> -SCH2CH(CN)2 <SEP> 3.25 <tb> <SEP> 3 <SEP> CH3OCH2CH2O- <SEP> C2H5S- <SEP> -OCH2CH2OCH3 <SEP> 3.73 <tb> <SEP> 4 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -OC2H5 <SEP> 2.86 <tb> <SEP> 5 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -OCH-SCH2CH3 <SEP> 3.70 <tb> <SEP> CCl3 <tb> <SEP> CHO <tb> <SEP> 6 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -O- <SEP> # <SEP> 3.70 <tb> <SEP> CH=CHNO2 <tb> <SEP> 7 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -O- <SEP> # <SEP> 3.65 <tb> TABLE VIII (continued) EMI23.1 Cmpd. <SEP> Herbicide <SEP> Residue <tb> <SEP> No. <SEP> R4Y- <SEP> R5- <SEP> -X-R6 <SEP> After <SEP> 2 <SEP> days <SEP> (ppm) <tb> <SEP> 8 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -O-CH-S-#-Cl <SEP> 3.97 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> CCl3 <tb> <SEP> 9 <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> -S-n-C7H15 <SEP> 3.83 <tb> <SEP> 10 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -O-CH-#-CH3 <SEP> 3.79 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> C#CH <tb> <SEP> 11 <SEP> S-O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -S-#-Cl <SEP> 3.74 <tb> <SEP> 12 <SEP> CH3SCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-CH(CH3)-# <SEP> 3.56 <tb> <SEP> 13 <SEP> CH3SCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-CH2CH2-S-# <SEP> 3.46 <tb> <SEP> 14 <SEP> CH3S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -OCH2CH2S-#-CH3 <SEP> 3.81 <tb> <SEP> 15 <SEP> CH3S- <SEP> CH3- <SEP> -OCH3 <SEP> 3.25 <tb> <SEP> 16 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -OCH3 <SEP> 3.16 <tb> <SEP> 17 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H2- <SEP> -S-S <SEP> 3.85 <tb> TABLE VIII (continued) EMI24.1 Cmpd. <SEP> Herbicide <SEP> Residue <tb> <SEP> No. <SEP> R4-Y- <SEP> R5- <SEP> -X-R6 <SEP> After <SEP> 2 <SEP> days <SEP> (ppm) <tb> <SEP> 18 <SEP> CH2=CHCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -OCH(CCl3)-#-Cl <tb> <SEP> 19 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -O-#-CH=C-SC2H5 <tb> <SEP> # <tb> <SEP> CN <tb> <SEP> 20 <SEP> CH3SCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-#-CH=CHCN <tb> TABLE IX 2-Day Soil Persistence Test - Run &num;2 Hrebicide: S-ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate Application Rates: Herbicide 6 ppm (weight) Extender 4 ppm (weith) Herbicide Alone: Trial A : Trial B : EMI25.1 Residue After 2 Days (ppm) Herbicide with Extender: EMI25.2 EMI25.3 Cmpd. <SEP> Herbicide <SEP> Residue <tb> <SEP> No. <SEP> R4-Y- <SEP> R5- <SEP> -X-R6 <SEP> After <SEP> 2 <SEP> days <SEP> (ppm) <tb> <SEP> Cl <tb> <SEP> 21 <SEP> CH2=C(CH3)CH2O <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O- <SEP> # <SEP> -Cl <SEP> 2.21 <tb> <SEP> Cl <tb> <SEP> 22 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SCH-#-Cl <SEP> 2.26 <tb> <SEP> C#N <tb> <SEP> 23 <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SCH2C(SCH3)2CH3 <SEP> 2.26 <tb> <SEP> 24 <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> -SCH2C#N <SEP> 2.46 <tb> <SEP> 25 <SEP> N#CCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> O-#-NO2 <SEP> 2.60 <tb> <SEP> 26 <SEP> (CH3)3CS- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SCH2SC2H5 <SEP> 2.67 <tb> TABLE IX (continued) EMI26.1 Cmpd. <SEP> Herbicide <SEP> Residue <tb> <SEP> No. <SEP> R4-Y- <SEP> R5- <SEP> -X-R6 <SEP> After <SEP> 2 <SEP> days <SEP> (ppm) <tb> <SEP> 27 <SEP> (CH3)3CS- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SCH2C#CH <SEP> 3.72 <tb> <SEP> 28 <SEP> CH#CCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -S-# <SEP> 3.74 <tb> <SEP> 29 <SEP> BrCH2CH2O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SCH2C#CH <SEP> 3.21 <tb> <SEP> CH2 <tb> <SEP> 30 <SEP> CH3S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-C-# <SEP> 2.60 <tb> <SEP> 31 <SEP> (CH3)2CHO- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SCH2-# <SEP> 4.83 <tb> <SEP> 32 <SEP> CH2=CHCH2O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -S-#-Cl <SEP> 3.97 <tb> <SEP> 33 <SEP> C2H5SCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -OCH2-#Cl <SEP> 4.68 <tb> <SEP> CH3O <tb> <SEP> 34 <SEP> CH3S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -OCH2-# <SEP> 3.66 <tb> <SEP> 35 <SEP> (ClCH2)2CHO- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -S-#-NO2 <SEP> 3.66 <tb> <SEP> 36 <SEP> (ClCH2)2CHO- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -S-# <SEP> 3.61 <tb> <SEP> 37 <SEP> C3H7O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -S-#-Cl <SEP> 2.89 <tb> TABLE IX (continued) EMI27.1 Cmpd. <SEP> Herbicide <SEP> Residue <tb> <SEP> No. <SEP> R4-Y- <SEP> R5- <SEP> -X-R6 <SEP> After <SEP> 2 <SEP> days <SEP> (ppm) <tb> <SEP> 38 <SEP> S#-O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-#-Cl <SEP> 4.19 <tb> <SEP> 39 <SEP> S#-O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -S-#-Cl <SEP> 3.82 <tb> <SEP> CF3 <tb> <SEP> 40 <SEP> CH3CH=CHCH2O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-# <SEP> 2.88 <tb> <SEP> 41 <SEP> CH2=CHCH2O- <SEP> CH3- <SEP> -O-#-NO2 <SEP> 2.75 <tb> <SEP> 42 <SEP> CH2=CHCH2O- <SEP> CH3- <SEP> -O-#-CN <SEP> 3.02 <tb> <SEP> 43 <SEP> CH#CCH2S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -OCH2CH2-NO2 <SEP> 2.28 <tb> <SEP> CH3O-C=O <tb> <SEP> 44 <SEP> CH3S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-# <SEP> 2.24 <tb> <SEP> 45 <SEP> C2H5S- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SC2H5 <SEP> 2.13 <tb> TABLE X 2-Day Soil Persistance Tests - Run #3 Herbicide: S-Ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate Aplication Rates: Herbicide 6 ppm (weight) Extender 4 ppm (weight) Herbicide Alone: Trial A EMI28.1 : <SEP> 0.13 <SEP> Residue <tb> : <SEP> 0.11 <tb> R4-Y <SEP> S <tb> <SEP> #P-X-R6 <tb> <SEP> R5 <tb> After 2 Days (ppm) Trial B Herbicide with Extender: EMI28.2 Cmpd. <SEP> Herbicide <SEP> Residue <tb> <SEP> No. <SEP> R4-Y- <SEP> R5- <SEP> -X-R6 <SEP> After <SEP> 2 <SEP> days <SEP> (ppm) <tb> <SEP> 46 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-#CN <SEP> 1.08 <tb> <SEP> 47 <SEP> (CH3)2CHO- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -S-# <SEP> 0.98 <tb> <SEP> C#CC3H7 <tb> <SEP> 48 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -O-# <SEP> 1.08 <tb> <SEP> 49 <SEP> C2H5CH(CH3)CH2O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -S-# <SEP> 0.51 <tb> <SEP> Cl <tb> <SEP> 50 <SEP> C2H5CH(CH3)CH2O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-#-NO2 <SEP> 0.56 <tb> <SEP> 51 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -SCH2C(SCH3)2CH3 <SEP> 2.16 <tb> <SEP> 52 <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> C2H5O- <SEP> -SCH2C(SCH3)2CH3 <SEP> 1.82 <tb> <SEP> 53 <SEP> CH3O- <SEP> CH3- <SEP> -SCH2C(SCH3)2CH3 <SEP> 0.69 <tb> <SEP> NO2 <tb> <SEP> 54 <SEP> (CH3)2CHCH2CH2O- <SEP> C2H5- <SEP> -O-#-Cl <SEP> 0.92 <tb> METHODS OF APPLICATION The herbicidal compositions of the present invention are useful in controlling the growth of undesirable vegetation by pre-emergence or post-emergence application to the locus where control is desired, including pre-plant and post-plant soil incorporation as well as surface application. The compositions are generally embodied in formulations suitable for convenient application. Typical formulations contain additional ingredients or diluent carriers which are either inert or active. Examples of such ingredients or carriers are water, organic solvents, dust carriers, granular carriers, surface active agents, oil and water, water-oil emulsions, wetting agents, dispersing agents, and emulsifying agents. The herbicidal formulations generally take the form of dusts, emulsifiable concentrates, granules and pellets, or microcapsules. A. DUSTS Dusts are dense powder compositions which are intended for application in dry form. Dusts are characterized by their free-flowing and rapid settling properties so that they are not readily windborne to areas where their presence is not d-e.sired. They contain primarily an active material nd g dense, freeflowing, solid carrier. Their performance is sometimes aided by the inclusion of a wetting agent, and convenience in manufacture frequently demands the inclusion of an inert, absorptive grinding aid. For the dust compositions of this invention, the inert farrier may be either of vegetable or mineral origin, the wetting agent is preferably anionic or nonionic, and suitable absorptive grinding aids are of mineral origin. Suitable classes of inert solid carriers for use in the dust compositions are those organic or inorganic powders which posses; high bulk density and are very freeflowing. They are also characterized by low surface area and poor liquidabsorptivity. Suitable grinding aids are natural clays, diatomaceous earths, and synthetic mineral fillers derived from silica or silicate. Among ionic and nonionic wetting agents, the most suitable are the members of the group known to the art as wetting agents and emulsifiers. Although solid agents are preferred because of ease in incorporation some liquid rionionic agents are also suitable in the dust formulations. Preferred dust carriers are micaceous talcs, pyrophyllite, dense kaolin clays, tobacco dust and ground calcium phosphate rock. Preferred grinding aids are attapulgite clay, diatomaceous silica, synthetic fine silica and synthetic calcium and magnesium silicates. Most preferred wetting agents are alkylbenzene and alkylnaphthalene sulfonates, sulfated fatty alcohols, nines or acid amides, long chain acid esters of sodium isothionate, esters of sodium sulfosuccinate, sulfated or sulfonated fatty acid esters, petroleum sulfonates, sulfonated vegetable oils, and ditertiary acetylenic glycols. Preferred ispersants are methyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, lignin sulfonates, polymeric alkylnaphthalene sulfonates, sodium naphthalenesulfonate, polymethylene bisnaphthalenesulfonate, and sodium-N-methyl-N-(long chain acid) taurates. The inert solid carriers in the dusts of this invention are usually present in concentrations of from about 30 to 90 weight percent of the total composition. The grinding aid will usually constitute 5 to 50 weight percent of the compositions, and the wetting agent will constitute from about 0 to 1.0 weight percent of the composition. Dust compositions can also contain other surfactants such as dispersing agents in concentrations of up to about 0.5 weight percent, and minor amounts of anticaking and antistatic agents. The particle size of the carrier is usually in the range of 30 to 50 microns. B. EMULSIFIABtE CONCENTRATES Emulsifiable concentrates are usually solutions of the active materials in nonwater-miscible solvents together svith an emulsifying agent. Prior to use, the concentrate is diluted with water to form a suspended emulsion of solvent droplets. Typical solvents for use in emulsifiable concentrates include weed oils, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and nonwater-miscible ethers, esters, and ketones. Typical emulsifying agents are anionic or nonionic surfactants, or mixtures of the two. Examples include long-chain alkyl or mercaptan polyethoxy alcohols, alkylaryl polyethoxy alcohols, sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene ethers with sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene glycol esters with fatty or rosin acids, fatty alkylol amide condensates, calcium and amine salts of fatty alcohol sulfates, oil soluble petrdeum sulfonates or, preferably, mixtures of these emulsifying agents. Such emulsifying agents will comprise from about 1 to 10 weight percent of the total composition. Thus, emulsifiable concentrates of the present invention will consist of from about 15 to about 50 weight percent active material, about 40 to 82 weight percent solvent, and about 1 to 10 weight percent emulsifier. Other additives such as spreading agents and stickers can also be included. C. GRANULES AND PELLETS Granules and pellets are physically stable, particulate compositions containing the active ingredients adhering to or distributed through a basic matrix of a coherent, inert carrier with macroscopic dimensions. A typical particle is about 1 to 2 millimeters in diameter. Surfactants are often present to aid in leaching of the active ingredients from the granule or pellet. The carrier is preferably of mineral origin, and generally falls within one of two types. The first are porous, absorptive, performed granules, such as preformed and screened granular attapulgite or heat expanded, granular, screened vermiculite. On either of these, a solution of the active agent can be sprayed and will be absorbed at concentrations up to 25 weight percent of the total weight. The second, which are also suitable for pellets, are initially powdered kaolin clays, hydrated attapulgite, or bentonite clays in the form of sodium, calcium or magnesium bentonites. Water-soluble salts, such as sodium salts, z may also be present to aid in the disintegration of granules or pellets in the presence of moisture. These ingredients are blended with the active components to give mixtures that are granulate or pelleted, followed by drying, to yield formulations with the active component distributed uniformly throughout the mass. Such granules and pellets can also be made with 25 to 30 weight percent active component, but more frequently a concentration of about 10 weight percent is desired for optimum distribution. The granular compositions of this invention are most useful in a size range of 15-30 mesh. The surfactant is generally a common wetting agent of anionic or nonionic character. The most suitable wetting agents depend upon the type of granule used. When preformed granules are sprayed with active material in liquid form the most suitable wetting agents are nonionic, liquid wetters miscible with the solvent. These are compounds more generally known to the art as emulsifiers, and comprise alkylaryl polyether alcohols, alkyl polyether alcohols, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters, polyethylene glycol esters with fatty or rosin acids, fatty alkylol amide condensates, oil solution petroleum or vegetable oil sulfonates, or mixtures of these. Such agents will usually comprise up to about 5 weight percent of the total composition. When the active ingredient is first mixed with a powdered carrier and subsequently granulated, or pelleted, liquid nonionic wetters can still be used, but it is usually preferable to incorporate at the mixing stage one. of the solid, powdered anionic wetting agents such as those previously listed for the wettable powders. Such agents will comprise from about 0 to 2 weight percent of the total composition. Thus, the preferred granular or pelleted formulations of this invention comprise about 5 to 30 weight percent active material, about 0 to 5 weight percent wetting agent, and about 65 to 95 weight percent inert material carrier, as these terms are used herein. D. MICROCAPSULES Microcapsules consist of fully enclosed droplets or granules containing the active materials, in which the enclosing material is an inert porous membrane, arranged to allow escape of the enclosed materials to the surrounding medium at controlled rates over a specified period. Microcapsules are particularly useful in the present invention since the organophosphorus compounds of the herbicide composition are liquid. Encapsulated droplets are typically about 1 to 50 microns in diameter. The enclosed liquid typically constitutes about 50 to 95% of the weight of the entire capsule, and may contain a small amount of solvent in addition to the active materials. Encapsulated granules are characterized by porous membranes sealing the openings of the granule carrier pores, trapping the liquid containing the active components inside for controlled release. A typical granule size ranges from 1 millimeter to 1 centimeter in diameter. In agricultural usage, the granule size is generally about 1 to 2 millimeters in diameter. Granules formed by extrusion, agglomeration, or prilling are useful in the present invention as well as materials in their naturally occurring form. Examples of such carriers are vermiculite, sintered clay granules, kaolin, attapulgite clay, sawdust, and granular cargo: . Useful encapsulating materials include natural and synthetic rubbers, cellulosic materials, syrene-butadiene copolymers, polyacrylonitriles, polyacrylates, polyesters, polyamides, polyurethanes, and starch xanthates. E. IN GENERAL Each of the above formulations can be prepared as a package containing both the thiocarbamate herbicide and the organophosphorus extender together with the other ingredients of the formulation (diluents, emulsifiers, surfactants, etc.). The formulations can also be prepared by a tank mix method, in which the ingredients are obtained separately and combined at the grower site. The herbicide and extender may both be used in the same type of formulation or a different formulation may be used for each, e.g., the herbicide may be in microcapsule form while the extender may be an emulsifiable concentrate, or vice versa. As a further alternative, the herbicide and extender can be applied sequentially, with either being applied first. This is a less preferred method, however, since more effective results are obtained with simultaneous application. In general, any conventional method of application can be used. The locus of application can be soil, seeds, seedlings, or the actual plants, as well as flooded fields. Soil application is preferred. Dusts and liquid compositions can be applied by the use of powder dusters, boom and hand sprayers, and spray dusters. The compositions can also be applied from airplanes as dusts or sprays because they are effective in very low dosages. In order to modify or control the growth of germinating seeds or emerging seedlings. as a typical example, the dust and liquid compositions are applied to the soil according to conventional methods and are distributed in the soil to a depth of at least one-half inch below the soil surface. It is not necessary that the phytotoxic compositions be admixed with the soil particles. Instead, these compositions can be applied merely by spraying or sprinkling the surface of the soil. The phytotoxic compositions of this invention can also be applied by addition to irrigation water supplied to the field to be treated. This method of application permits the penetration of the compositions into the soil as the water is absorbed therein. Dust compositions, granular compositions or liquid formulations applied to the surface of the soil can be distributed below the surface of the soil by conventional means such as discing, dragging or mixing operations The herbicide/extender compositions can also be applied to the soil through irrigation systems. According to this technique, the compositions are added directly to irrigation water immediately prior to irrigation of the field. This technique is applicable in all geographical areas regardless of rainfall, since it permits supplementation of the natural rainfall at critical stages of plant growth. In a typical application, the concentration of the herbicide/extender composition in the irrigation water will range from about 10 to 150 parts per million by weight. The irrigation water can be applied by the use of sprinkler systems, surface furrows, or flooding. Such application is most effectively done before the weeds germinate, either early in the spring prior to germination or within two days after cultivation of the field. The compositions of this invention can also contain further additaments, such as fertilizers, insecticides, or other herbicides. Suitable pesticides include 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acids, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy acetic acid, 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, and the salts, esters and amides thereof; triazine derivatives, such as 2,4-bis-(3-methoxypropylamino)-6-methyl-thio-s-triazine; 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine; 2-ethylamino-4-isopropylamino-6-methylmercapto-s-triazine; urea derivatives such as 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea; acetamides such as N,N-diallyl- -chloroacetamide, N-( < -chloroacetyl) hexamethyleneimine, and N,N-diethyl > -bromoacetamide; and benzoic acids such as 3-amino-2,5dichlorobenzoic acid. Fertilizers useful in combination with the active ingredients include ammonium nitrate, urea, and superphosphate. Other useful additaments include materials in which plant organisms take root and grow, such as compost, manure, humus, sand and the like. The amount of composition of the present invention which constitutes a herbicidally effective amount depends upon the nature of the seeds or plants to be controlled. The rate of application of active ingredient varies from about 0.01 to about 50 pounds per acre, preferably about 0.1 to about 25 pounds per acre with the actual amount used depending on the overall cost and the desired results. It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that compositions exhibiting lower herbicidal activity will require a higher dosage rate for the same degree of control than more active compounds.

Claims: WHAT IS CLAIMED IS: 1. An herbicidal composition comprising (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI37.1 in which RÚ is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-C9 phenylalkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substituted with one, rwo, or three halogen atoms, and R and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5 -C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; and (b) an amount of an organophosphorus compound having the formula EMI37.2 in which R4 is Cl-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 alkynyl, or C5-C7 cycloalkyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one or more members selected from halo, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, and C1-C3 alkyl thio, R5 is C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, or C1-C4 alkyl thio, is is C1-C10 alkyl, C2-C10 alkenyl, or C2-C4 alkynyl, optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, nitro, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylthio, C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or in which R7 is C1-C4 alkyl, C2-C4 alkenyl, or C2-C4 alkynyl, optionally substitu ted with one or more members selected from halo and cyano, m is zero or one, and is phenyl optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, trifluoromethyl, nitro, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, C1-C3 carbalkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylsulfinyl, X is oxygen or sulfur, and Y is oxygen or sulfur, sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 2. An herbicidal composition comprising (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI38.1 in which R1 is C1-G6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-Cg phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, optionally substituted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; and (b) an amount of an organophosphorus compound having the formula EMI38.2 in which R4 is C1-C4 alkyl, R is C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, or C1-C4 alkyl thio, R6 is phenyl, chlorophenyl, nitrophenyl, c7-c9 allZylsulfinylphenyl, C7-C9 phenylalkyl, or C2-C6 alkylthioalkyl, and X is oxygen or sulfur, sufficient. to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 3. An herbicidal composition comprising (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI39.1 in which R1 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-Cg alkenyl, C7-Cg phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; and (b) an amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 4. An herbicidal composition comprising (a) S-ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate and (b) an amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 5. An herbicidal composition comprising (a) S-ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate and (b) an amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 6. A composition according to Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 in which the weight ratio of said thiocarbamate to said organophosphorus compound ranges from about 0.1:1 to about 50:1. 7. A composition according to Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 in which the weight ratio of said thiocarbamate to said organophosphorus compound ranges from about 1:1 to about 15:1. 8. A composition according to Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 further comprising a non-phytotoxic antidotally effective amount of a compound having the formula EMI40.1 in which n is 1 or 2, and R8 EMI40.2 are independently C1-C12 alkyl or C2-C12 alkenyl, or epresents the group EMI40.3 in which R10 and Rill are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and methyl, and R12 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C1-C4 alkyl, and phenyl. 9. A composition according to Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 further comprising a nonphytotoxic antidotally effective amount of N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide. 10. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying to the locus where control is desired both (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI40.4 in which R1 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-C9 phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; and (b) an amount of an organophosphorus compound having the formula EMI41.1 in which R4 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 alkynyl, or C5-C7 cycloalkyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one or more members selected from halo, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, and C1-C3 alkyl thio, R5 is C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, or C1-C4 alkyl thio, R6 is C1-C10 alkyl, C2-C10 alkenyl, or C2-C4 alkynyl, optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, nitro, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylthio, C5 -C7 cycloalkyl, or in which R7 is C4 alkyl, C2-C4 alkenyl, or C2-C4 alkynyl, optionally substitu ted with one or more members selected from halo and cyano, m is zero or one, and is phenyl optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, trifluoromethyl, nitro, cyano, C1 C3 alkoxy, C1 C3 carbalkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylsulfinyl, X is oxygen or sulfur, and Y is oxygen or sulfur, sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 11. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying to the locus where control is desired both (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI42.1 in which R1 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-Cg phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; and (b) an amount of an organophosphorus compound having the formula EMI42.2 in which R4 is C1-C4 alkyl, 5 R is C1-04 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, or C1-C4 alkyl- thio, R6 is phenyl, chlorophenyl, nitrophenyl, c7-C9 alkylsulfinylphenyl, C7-C9 phenylalkyl, or C2-C6 alkylthioalkyl, and X is oxygen or sulfur, sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 12. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying to the locus where control is desired both (a) an herbicidally effective amount of a thiocarbamate of the formula EMI43.1 in which R1 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-C9 phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; and (b) an amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 13. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying to the locus where control is desired both (a) S-ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate and (b) an amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 14. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation comprising applying to the locus where control is desired both (a) S-ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate and (b) an amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate sufficient to extend the soil life of said thiocarbamate. 15. A method according to Claims 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14 in which the weight ratio of said thiocarbamate to said organophosphorus compound ranges from about 0.1:1 to about 50:1. 16. A method according to Claims 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14 in which the weight ratio of said thiocarbamate to said organophosphorus compound ranges from about 1:1 to about 15:1. 17. A method according to Claims 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14 further comprising a nonphytotoxic antidotally effective amount of a compound having the formula EMI44.1 in which n is 1 or 2, and EMI44.2 are independently Cl-Cl2 alkyl or C2-C12 alkenyl, or epresents the group EMI44.3 in which R10 and R11 are independently selected from the 12 group consisting of hydrogen and methyl, and R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C1-C4 alkyl, and phenyl. 18. A method according to Claims 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14 further comprising a nonphytotoxic antidotally effective amount of N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide. 19. A method of extending the soil life of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI44.4 in which R1 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-Cg phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; which comprises applying to the soil containing said thiocarbamate or to which said thiocarbamate is to be applied an effective amount of an organophosphorus compound having the formula EMI45.1 in which R4 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C3-C6 alkynyl, or C5-C7 cycloalkyl, and is optionally subs tituted with one or more members selected from halo, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylthio, R5 is C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 alkoxy, or C1-C4 alkyl thio, R6 is C1-C10 alkyl, C2-C10 alkenyl, or C2-C4 alkynyl, optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, nitro, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy and C1-C3 alkylthio, C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or in which R7is C1-C4 alkyl, C2-C4 alkenyl, or C2-C4 alkynyl, optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo and cyano, m is zero or one, and is phenyl optionally substituted with one or more members selected from halo, trifluoromethyl, nitro, cyano, C1-C3 alkoxy, C1-C3 carbalkoxy, and C1-C3 alkylsulfinyl, X is oxygen or sulfur, and Y is oxygen or sulfur. 20. A method of extending the soil life of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI46.1 in which R1 is C1-C6 alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-Cg phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from C1-C6 alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-C7 alkylene; which comprises applying to the soil containing said thiocarbamate or to which said thiocarbamate is to be applied an effective amount of an organophosphorus compound having the formula EMI46.2 in which R4 is C1-C4 alkyl, R is C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C. alkoxy, or C1-C4 alkyl thio, R6 is phenyl, chlorophenyl, nitrophenyl, C7-Cg alkylsulfinylphenyl, C7-C9 phenylalkyl, or C2-C6 alkylthioalkyl, and X is oxygen or sulfur. 21, A method of extending the soil life of a thiocarbamate having the formula EMI47.1 in which This Cl-Cf; alkyl, C3-C6 alkenyl, C7-C9 phenyl alkyl, or phenyl, and is optionally substi tuted with one, two, or three halogen atoms, and R2 and R3 are either selected independently from Cl-Có alkyl and C5-C7 cycloalkyl, or combined to conjointly form C4-07 alkylene; which comprises applying to the soil containing said thiocarbamate or to which said thiocarbamate is to be applied an effective amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate. 22. A method of extending the soil life of S-ethyl di-n-propylthiocarbamate which comprises applying to the soil containing said thiocarbamate or to which said thiocarbamate is to be applied an effective amount of O,O-diethyl-O-phenyl phosphorothioate. 23. A method of extending the soil life of S-ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate which comprises applying to the soil containing said thiocarbamate or to which said thiocarbamate is to be applied an effective amount of O,O-diethyl O-phenyl phosphorothioate. 24. A method according to Claims 19, 20, 21, 22, or 23 in which the weight ratio of said thiocarbamate to said organophosphorus compound ranges from about 0.1:1 to about 50:1. 25. A method according to Claims 19, 20, 21, 22, or 23 in which the weight ratio of said thiocarbamate to said organophosphorus compound ranges from about 1:1 to about 15:1. 26. A method according to Claims 19, 20, 21, 22, or 23 further comprising a nonphytotoxic antidotally effective amount of a compound having; the formula EMI48.1 in which n is 1 or 2, and R8 and R9 are independently C-C, alkyl or C2-C12 alkenyl, or EMI48.2 represents the group EMI48.3 in which R10 and Rill are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and methyl, and R12 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C1-C4 alkyl, and phenyl. 27. A method according to Claims 19, 20, 21, 22, or 23 further comprising a nonphytotoxic antidotally effective amount of N,N-diallyl dichloroacetamide.

Inventors: GRAY, REED ALDEN, HYZAK, DANIEL LOUIS
Applicants: STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1979
Main classification: A01N25
IPC codes: A01N47, A01N25