PROCESS FOR PRODUCING OLEFINS FROM CARBON MONOXIDE AND HYDROGEN

Abstract: Olefins of two to four carbon atoms are prepared by an improved Fischer-Tropsch process, the improvement compris­ ing the use of a catalyst having a surface area less than about 100 m²/g and consisting essentially of: (1) at least one material selected from the group consist­ ing of the sulfide, oxide or metal of Mo, W, Re, Ru, Ni, Pd, Rh, Os, Ir and Pt; (2) at least one material selected from the group consist­ ing of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba and Th; and (3) optionally, a support.

Description: PROCESS FOR PRODUCING OLEFINS FROM CARBON MONOXIDE AND HYDROGEN This invention relates to an improved Fischer -Tropsch process for the production of olefinic C2-C4 hydrocarbons. The prior art contains many examples of metals known to be useful in reacting carbon monoxide with hydrogen to produce a variety of compounds -- both hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds. These metals include, among others, Mo, W, Th, Ru, Re, Pd, Ni, Co, and Fe. It is upon the last three of these metals that most commercial experience is based. In the Fischer-Tropsch syntheses, carbon monoxide and hydrogen are reacted over an iron or cobalt catalyst to produce saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds containing from one to as many as one thousand carbon atoms. The hydrocarbons can be aliphatic, alicyclic, or aromatic. Commercial utilization of this synthesis prior to 1950 was accomplished largely in Germany and is summarized in Storch, Columbic, and Anderson: The Fischer-Tropsch and Related Synthesis, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1951. The major disadvantages in the prior art processes and catalysts is that most of them are not capable of selectively producing olefins. A process capable of producing olefins of low molecular weight could be usez as a source of feedstock for a variety of petrochemical plants. The present invention is a process for producing hydrocarbons by contacting carbon monoxide and hydrogen at reactive conditions, characterized by contacking the carbon monoxide and hydrogen with a catalyst having a surface area less than 100 m2/g and consisting of: (A) between 1 percent and 95 percent by weight based upon the weight of the catalyst of at least ore material selected from the group con sisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molyb denum, tungsten, rhenium, ruthenium, nickel, palla- dium, rhodium, osmium, iridium and platinum; and (B) between 0.05 percent and 50 percent by weight based upon the weight of the catalyst cf at least one material selected from the gre consist ing of the hydroxide, oxide or salt sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, magnesium, -- cium, strontium, barium and thorium. Optionally, the catalyst can contain as a third component a support. This invention markedly increases the production of C2-C4 olefins, particularly C3 and C4 olefins. The carbon monoxide required for the process can be obtained from any carbon source, such as from the degradation of coal or of high molecular weight hydrocarbon residuals. The molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide ranges generally from at least about 0.25 and preferably about 0.5 to an upper limit of about 4 and preferably about 1.5. Process reaction conditions can vary over a rather broad range. The pressure can vary from at least about 1 psig (0.14 kg/cm2) and preferably about 75 psig (5.3 kg/cm2) to an upper limit of about 1500 psig (106 kg/cm2) and preferably about 500 psig (35.2 kg/cm2). The reaction temperature ranges from at least about 2000C and preferably about 3000C to an upper limit of about 6000C and preferably about 4000C. The catalyst is typically either a two- or a three-component system. The first component is at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of each of molybdenum, tungsten, rhenium, ruthenium, palladium, rhodium, osmium, iridium and platinum. As used herein, "sulfide" includes those compounds that have oxygen and sulfur directly attached to the same metal atom, such as O-Mo-S. This first component is present in an amount, based upon the weight of the catalyst, of at least about 1 and preferably at least about 10 weight percent with an upper limit of about 95 and preferably about 50 weight percent. A preferred first component is at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum or of tungsten. These molybdenum and tungsten materials exhibit exceptionally good sulfur tolerance. An especially preferred first component is at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum. The second component is at least one mater lal selected from the group consisting of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of each of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium. and thorium. The second component is present in an amount, based upon the weight of the catalyst, of at least about 0.05 and preferably at least about 1 weight percent with an upper limit of about 50 and preferably about 10 weight percent. A preferred second component is at least one material selected from the group consisting of the hydrcxide, oxide or salt of each of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium or cesium. An especially preferred second component is at least one material selected from the group consisting of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of potassium. Obviously, the optional support is not necessary to --1rn - Invention but one is often employed for reasons of convenience. Virtually any support can be used but those most typical are the many and varied forms of alumina and carbon, silica, zirconia, zircon (a mixture of zirconia and silica), titanium dioxide, magnesia or mixtures thereof. Other suitable supports can also be used. An alumina support is preferred. Based upon the weight of the catalyst, the support can co.:-- between about 1 and preferably at least about 40 percent or catalyst with an upper limit of about 98.95 percent, a support is present, most preferably it comprises at least about 60 percent of the catalyst. Components of the catalyst of this invention can be present per se, or as an integral part of one another or as a combination thereof. Illustrative of components being present as an integral part of one another, certain supports (where a support is present) contain relatively small (based on the weight of the support) amounts of alkali metal hydroxides and/or oxides. Preferred species of the catalyst of this invention have as a first component at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum or of tungsten. More preferred species have as a first component at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum or of tungsten and as a second component at least one material selected from the group consisting of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of each o lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium. Still more preferred species have as a first component at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum or of tungsten, as a second component at least one material selected from the group consisting of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of each of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium, and as a third component an alumina, silica, carbon, zirconia, zircon or magnesia support. Especially preferred species have as a first component at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum, as a second component at least one material selected from the group consisting of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of potassium, and as e third component an alumina support. It is theorized that the efficient production of olefins by the process of this invention is related to the surface area of the catalyst. Supported or unsupported, the more efficient catalysts useful in the process of the invention possess a surface area of less than about 100 square meters per gram (mê/g) mesured by the Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) method and preferably less than about 40 m2/g. The BET method is described by R. B. Anderson, Experimental Methods in Catalvtic Research, p. 48-66 (Academic Press, 1968). In one embodiment of this invention, the catalyst can be represented by the formulae: xHyMeO3C2O4 and MbMeO3C2O4. (I) (11) Ma is a metal selected from the group consisting of Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, and mixtures thereof; Mb is a metal selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Th, and mix- tures thereof; Me is a metal selected from the group consisting of Mo and W; and x is 1 or 2 and y is 0 or 1 with the provisoes that when x is 1, y is 1 and when x is 2, y is 0. Catalysts of I are preferred to catalysts of II; catalysts wherein Ma is potassium are preferred to catalysts wherein Ma is ti, Na, Rb or Cs; and catalysts wherein Ma is potassium and Me is molybdenum are especially pe ferred. The catalyst species of this particular embodiment have a surface area less than about 100 mê/g (generally less than about 40 m2/g) and can be used either singly or in combination with one another. The catalyst is generally prepare(? by issolving two moles of oxalic acid per mole 0: oxide of Me in water, adding one mole of a hydrated MaMe oXiQt, adjusting the pH of the resulting solution to about 6, and allowing the solution to cool. Crystals of an ammo- nium complex of MaxHyMeO3C2O4 or MbMeO3C2O4 form and pre cipitate from solution. The crystals are then reduced with hydrogen for a suitable period, e.g., about 24 hours at a series of temperatures commencing with a minimum tem- perature of about 200 C and culminating in a maximum tem perature cf about 600 C. After reduction, the crystals are immediately useful as a catalyst in che process of the invention as they require no third component. The following examples illustrate the invention. All percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Apparatus and Procedure: In preparation of a supported catalyst, supports were impregnated by a technique known as the incipient wetness technique. Water-soluble salts of active compoll¯nzs of the catalyst and a support were chosen. A quantity of water which a catalyst support will absorb is known as its pore volume. According to the desired catalyst loading, a quantity of the soluble salts are dis solved in water approximately equal to the pore volume of the support. The support was then immersed in the water which it absorbed completely. A wet cake was formed. The wet cake was first air-dried at room temperature for sixteen to twenty-four hours. It was then placed in an oven and heated at a rate of between about 0.40C and about 1.80C per minute in the presence of air or nitrogen to a final temperature of between about 5000C and about 6500 C. The catalyst was held at this final temperature for about six hours before being allowed to cool slowly to room temperature. In the examples, an apparatus was utilized which included in sequential order three high-pressure gas bottles, a manifold, and a reactor equipped on the downstream side with a fine metering valve and a rotameter through a sampling manifold to a gas chromatograph. One bottle contained a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a one to one molar ratio. The second bottle contained a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a one to ttro ratio. The third bottle contained hydrogen alone. Each bottle was independently connected to the manifold. The manifold was constructed such that any of the three bottles could be used to feed the reactor. Through the sampling manifold, the product of each reactor could be piped to the gas chromatograph for analysis. Before each run, catalyst was loaded in the reactor to be used and heated to 3500C over a four-hour period in the presence of hydrogen. The hydrogen flow and a temperature of 3500C were maintained for sixteen more nours. Then the catalyst was raised to a final temperature over a four-hour period. The final temperature was between about 5000C and about 650 C. This final temperature was held for about two to forty-eight hours. The outlet temperature of each reactor in use was maintained by the use of a hot air stream. The reactors were than lowered --,o operating temperature in the presence of hydrogen. Next, feed from the high-pressure gas bottle containing hydrogen and carbon monoxide was allowed to flow through the manifold to the reactor. Pressure, flow, and temperature were adjusted to operating values, Unless otherwise indicated the operating values were for the hourly space velocity: 300 hr-1; for the tempera- ture: 3000C; and for the pressure: 300 ps@ kg/cmê). The H2/CO ratio was one unless otherwise i. cated. Subscripts in all examples indicate the number of carbon atoms. All hydrocarbon analyses are reported in carbon mole percent in all examples. "Carbon mole percent is defined as 100 times the moles of carbon present in a hydrocarbon fraction divided by the total moles of carbon in the product hydrocarbon. If one mole of ethylene is found in the C2 fraction, this is counted as two moles of carbon. The term "product hydrocarbon" excludes any carbon dioxide produced. Unless otherwise indicated, molybdenum concentrations are reported as MoO3 equivalents and potassium concentrations are reported as K20 equivalents. The surface area (support plus the first and second com 2 ponents) of each catalyst was less than about 40 m unless indicated to the contrary. Example 1: In order to demonstrate the effect of increasing concentration of the second component of the catalyst, the following three runs were conducted. The catalyst of the first run (1A) was commercially available and was composed of 10 weight percent MoO3 on alumina. In run lB, the catalyst of Run 1A was modified by the addition of 2 weight percent K2 0 according to the incipient wetness technique described above. In run 1C, the catalyst was prepared by dissolving 93.2 g Al(NO ) 9Hz0, 15.1 g (NH4)6Mo7O24 4H2O, and 3.6 g KNO3 in 850 cc of water, evaporation of the water to form a wet cake, and drying the wet cake under reduced pressure for about 12 to 24 hours. The wet cake was then calcined by heating it in the presence of air from ambient temperature to 6500C at a rate of about 1.80C per minute and holding it at 6500C for 6.5 hours. The catalyst was reduced to particles of about 1 mm diameter of grinding. On a weight basis, the calcined catalyst was composed of 48 percent MoO3, 48 percent A1203, and 4 percent K20. Run Run Run 1A 1B 1C Paraffins: C1 62.3 42.0 37.6 C2 21.6 31.3 25.8 C3 9.0 12.7 13.8 C4 3.9 6.6 4.4 Olefins: C2 0.9 2.2 0.9 C3 - 2.7 8.7 C4 - 0.9 4.8 Olefins & Paraffins: C5 2.3 1.5 2.1 C6 - - 1.8 Carbon Monoxide Conversion (mole percent) 70.0 58.0 57.0 Weight percent K20 0 2.0 4.0 Percent Olefins in C -C Fraction 2 2.6 11.5 24.7 BET Surface Area (m2/g) 64.0 64.0 "5.v The results of Runs 1A, 1B, and 1C are summarized above. The poor yield of olefins in the desired C2-C4 range has been improved by the addition of 2 weight percent K2O to the catalyst of Run 1B. The best yield of olefins in the desired range is obtained in Run C. Example 2: In Run 2 the catalyst is that of Run 1C. However, in Run 2 the H2/CO ratio was decreased from 1 to 1/2. The results of Run 1C and Run 2 are summarized below for comparision. Run 1C Run 2 Paraffins: C1 37.6 24.6 C2 25.8 23.2 C2 13.8 15.3 C2 4.4 5.8 Olefins: C2 0.9 4.2 C3 8.7 13.8 C4 4.8 8.0 Olefins & Paraffins: C5 2.1 3.4 C6 1.8 1.7 Carbon Monoxide Conversion (mole percent) 57.0 37.0 Weight percent K2O 4.0 4.0 H2/CO ratio 1:1 1:2 Percent Olefins in C2-C4 Fraction 24.7 37.0 BET Surface Area (mê/g) -5.0 -5.0 These data indicate that a decrease in the H2/CO ratio increases the yield of olefins in the desired C2 to C4 range at the expense of a drop in the CO conversion. Example 3: In Run 3, the catalyst was prepared as in Run 1C except that it was composed of 45 percent MoO3, 45 percent Al203, and 10 percent K20. The results of both Run 1C and Run 3 are summarized below for comparison. Run 1C Run 3 Paraffins: C1 37.6 30.1 C2 25.8 4.5 C3 13.8 2.0 C4 4.4 1.2 Olefins: C2 0.9 6.6 C3 8.7 6.0 C4 4.8 2.8 Olefins & Paraffins : C5 2.1 0.3 C6 1.8 2.0 Oil - 44.6 Carbon Monoxide Conversion (mole percent) 57.0 54.0 Weight percent K20 4.0 10.0 Percent Olefins in C2-C4 Fraction 24.7 66.7 BET Surface Area (m2/g) 5.0 6.5 Thee data indicate that while an increase in concentration of the second component of this catalyst from 4 percent to 10 percent does not significantly improve the yield of C -C olefins, it does significantly improve the percent of olefins in the C2-C4 hydrocarbon fraction. This increase in the concentration of the second component also changes the olefinic product distribution. Example 4: For Runs 4A and 4B a commercially available zircon was impregnated via the incipient wetness technique with 10 percent MoO3 to make the catalyst for Run 4A and with 10 percent MoO3 and 5 percent K2 0 to make the catalyst for Run 4B. The hourly space velocity in Run 4A of 323 hr-1 and the hourly space velocity of Run 4B was 362 her 1. Run 4A Run 4B Paraffins: C1 62.4 19.1 C2 25.9 6.7 C3 7.0 5.0 C4 1.2 2.2 Olefins: C2 - 1.7 C3 - 12.4 C4 - 9.0 Olefins & Paraffins: C5 - 1.3 C6 - 1.7 Oil 3.4 40.8 Carbon Monoxide Conversion (mole percent) 60.0 92.0 Weight percent K20 0 5.0 Percent Olefin in C2-C4 Fraction 0 65.0 BET Surface Area* (mê/g) 0.31 0.31 *Surface area of support only. These data indicate the dramatic improvement in yield of desired olefins effected by the second component of the catalyst. The presence in Run 4B of the two components, MoO3 and K2O, on a support of low surface area results in a with carbon monoxide conversion and a goo olefin yield ir the C2-C4 fraction. Example 5: In this run a potassium oxalatomolybdate was prepared by dissolving with stirring 12.7 g (0.1 mole) of oxalic acid and 14.4 g (0.1 mole) of molybdenum trioxide in water to form a solution. After the addition of 12.6 g (0.1 mole) more of oxalic acid and 30.7 g (0.0937 mole) of K2MoO4-5Ez0, a precipitate formed. The pH of the solution, measured at 2, was adjusted to 6 by the addition of a sufficient quantity of 28 percent ammonia. At this point the precipitate disappeared. The solution which had been heated by the addition of ammonia was allowed to cool. Crystals formed, were analyzed by x-ray fluorescence, and were found to contain 25.2 percent Mo, 23.4 percent K, and 5.7 percent C, with the remainder being hydrogen and oxygen. The crystals were dried, placed in a reactor, and hydrogen was passed through the reactor for about a 60-hour period during which time the temperature was raised in steps from 150 C to 520 C with the pressure remianing fixed at 15 psig (1.06 kg/cmê). Results: Paraffins: C1 23.8 C2 3.9 C3 1.4 C4 0.9 Olefins: C2 8.3 C3 9.5 C4 5.8 Olefins & Paraffins: "5 C6 & higher 46.3 Carbon Monoxide Conversion (mole percent) 42.7 Percent Olefin in C2-C4 Fraction 79.2 BET Surface Area (m2/g) 6.1 These data illustrate an unsupported catalyst useful in the process of the invention to improve the yield of olefins in the C2 to C4 range. Example 6; A1203 (105 g) was impregnated with 2 solution consisting of MoO3 (41.5 g), ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (42.6 g) and K2CO3 (8.12 g) dissolved n 500 mi of water with an adjusted (by NH4OH) pH of about 6. The Al2O3 was impregnated by dripping the solutin onto it while the Al2O3 was rotated within a heated (1200C) drum. Thee individual samples of the resulting catalyst were emplcyed in the following runs: 6A 6B 6C Temperature ( C) 396 396 422 Pressure, psig 2 286 143 143 (kg/cmê) (20.2) (10.1) (10.1) HSV (hr-1) 536 447 422 Paraffins: C1 32.0 29.9 33.6 5.4 4.1 5.3 C3 3.7 5.0 6.1 C4 1.3 1.2 1.4 Olefins: C2 9.2 11.0 11.2 C3 3.7 5.4 6.4 C4 2.1 2.2 2.4 Olefin & Paraffin: C5 & highers 41.3 41.1 33.7 Carbon Monoxide Conversion (mole percent) 48.4 32.0 45.9 Percent Olefin in C2-C4 Fraction 59.0 64.0 61.0 BET Surface Area* (mê/g) 0.@ 4.0 4.0 *Surface area of sapport cis y. A comparison of the 6A and 65 results demo- strate that a reduction of pressure increases the selec tivity of C2-C4 olefins but at the expense of carbon monoxide conversion. However, the results of 6C demonstrate that this increased selectivity can be maintained without substantial sacrifice of carbon monoxide conver- sion by an increase in temperature Example 7: To demonstrate the sulfur tolerance of cer tain catalyst species of this invention, particularly those comprising a sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum, a catalyst comprising 10 percent MoO3, 2 percent K20 and 88 percent Carborundum SAEHS-33 A1203 was first exposed to the following conditions for 366 hours: : Temperature (0 C) 417 Pressure (psig) 287 (20.2 kg/cm2) HSV (hr-1) 282 H2/CO 0.94 BET Surface Area* (mê/g) 4 *Surface area of support only. After this first exposure, the catalyst was then exposed to an additional 116 hours of the same conditions except that 20 ppm H2S was added and the HSV increased to 356 hr-1. The results of a gas phase analysis of both exposures are reported below: Without H2S with H2S Paraffins: C1 39.8 43.0 C2 7.2 6.2 C3 8.4 2.2 C4 1.0 1.1 Olefins: 22.7 19.8 C3 16.6 19.9 C4 4.3 6.9 Carbon Monoxide Conversion (mole percent) 41.7 37.1 These data demonstrate no significant change in activity (carbon monoxide conversion) or gas phase ole- fin selectivity upon exposure to a relatively large centration of H2S. Example 8 and Control: Two samples each of equal weight of catalyst Mo-1201 (surface area of 160 mê/g), and Mo-0502 (surface area of 60 mê/g), both 10 percent molybdeum trixide on alumina were used as catalysts in these experiments. sample of each catalyst was alkalized with potassium car bonate while the other sample of each catalyst was alkalized in a similar fashion plus sulfided with potassium sulfide, ammonium sulfide and molybdenum sulfide. All the catalysts were then reduced with hydrogen at 500 C and subsequencly used to catalyze a Fischer-Tropsch hydrcarbon systhesis. The parameter and results of these experiments are reported below. Mo-1201 Mo-0502 Process parameters: Catalyst surface area (mê/g) 160 60 Pressure, psig (kg/cm2) 300 (21.2) 300 (21.2) H2/CO ratio 0.8-1 0.8-1 Temperature ( C) A 400 400 B. 370 370 Process results: (% hydrocarbon product) A. Oxide form of catalyst (10% MoO3, 2%K2O) C1 47 43 C2-C4 (saturated) 51 51 C2-C4 (unsaturated) 1 5 C5+ 1 1 Total 100 100 B. Sulfide form of catalyst (15% MoO3, 2.7% K2O) C1 60 54 C2-C4 (saturated) 40 43 C2-C4 (unsaturated) 0 3 C5+ 0 0 Total 100 100 The above data demonstrate the surprising effect that surface area has on the synthesis of C2 -C4 olefinic hydrocarbons, specifically: (a) the oxide from of catalyst Mo-1201 having a surface area of 160 mê/gproduced only 1 percent C2-C4 olefinic hydrocarbon and the sulfide form of the same catalyst produced no C2-Ca olefin c hydro carbon; and (b) the oxide form of catalyst Mo-0502 havana a surface area of 60 mê/g produced 5 percent C2-C4 olefinic hydrocarbon and the sulfide form of the same catalyst produced 3 percent C2 -C4 olefinic hydrocarbon

Claims: 1. A process for producing hydrocarbons by contacting carbon monoxide and hydrogen at reactive conditions, characterized by contacting the carbon monoxide and hydrogen with a catalyst having a surface area less than 100 m2/g and consisting of: (A) between 1 percent and 95 percent by weight based upon the weight of the catalyst of at least one material selected from the group consist ing of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum, tungsten, rhenium, ruthenium, nickel, palladium, rhodium, osmium, iridium and platinum; and (B) between 0.05 percent and 50 percent by weight based upon the weight of the catalyst of at least one material selected from the group consists ing of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, magnesium, cal- cium, strontium, barium and thorium. 2. The process of Claim 1 wherein the catalyst has a surface area less than 40 m2/g. 3. The process of Claim 2 wherein the catalyst consists easentially of, in addition to A and between 1 and 98.95 percent by weight, based pon the weight of the catalyst, cf a support. 4. The process of Claim z wherein the sup- port is alumina, carbon, silica, zirconia, zircon, magnesia, titanium dioxide or mixtures thereof. 5. The process of Claim 3 wherein B is at least one material selected from the group consisting of the hydroxide, oxide or salt of lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium or cesium. 6. The process of Claim 3 wherein A is at least one material selected from the group consisting of the sulfide, oxide or metal of molybdenum or tungsten. 7. The process of Claim 3 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of between 10 and 50 percent A. 8. The process of Claim 7 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of between 1 and 10 percent B. 9. The process of Claim 8 wherein the catalyst consists essentially of at least 40 percent of the support.

Inventors: MURCHISON, CRAIG BRIAN, MURDICK, DEWEY A.
Applicants: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Application year: 1979
Main classification: C07C1
IPC codes: C07C67, C10G2, C07C1, B01J23, C07B61, B01J35, C07C11, B01J31, B01J27