amphora/finqa_suite huggingface dataset:
item 11 . executive compensation information with respect to executive compensation required by this item 11 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the captions 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201cexecutive officer and director compensation 201d ( including all subcaptions and tables thereunder ) and 201cboard committees 2014 compensation committee 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this item 12 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the caption 201cownership of our stock 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . authorization of securities under equity compensation plans 2014 securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans at december 31 , 2013 are as follows: .
|plan category|column a number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )|column b weighted average exercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights|column c number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column a )|
|equity compensation plans approved by securityholders|151945|$ 24.61|2140954|
|equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders|n/a|n/a|n/a|
|total|151945|$ 24.61|2140954|
( a ) does not include 1534294 shares of unvested restricted stock and performance units granted pursuant to our amended and restated 1999 long-term equity incentive plan . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence required by this item 13 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the captions 201ctransactions with related persons 201d and 201celection of directors 2014 determination of director independence , 201d respectively , and is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accounting fees and services information with respect to fees and services of the principal accountant required by this item 14 will be included in pca 2019s proxy statement under the caption 201cratification of appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm 201d under the subcaptions 201c 2014 fees to the independent registered public accounting firm 201d and 201c 2014 audit committee preapproval policy for audit and non-audit fees 201d and are incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: as of december 312013 what was the ratio of the equity compensation plans approved by security holders remaining to be issued to the amount to be issued upon exercise of outstanding
Answer: 14.09032
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis regulatory asset associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , in which entergy mississippi agreed not to pursue recovery of the costs deferred by an mpsc order in the new nuclear generation docket . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2014 net revenue|$ 5735|
|retail electric price|187|
|volume/weather|95|
|louisiana business combination customer credits|-107 ( 107 )|
|miso deferral|-35 ( 35 )|
|waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision|-32 ( 32 )|
|other|-14 ( 14 )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 5829|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 formula rate plan increases at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 ; 2022 an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2015 and july 2014 , and new energy efficiency riders at entergy louisiana and entergy mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income ; and 2022 an annual net rate increase at entergy mississippi of $ 16 million , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate and regulatory proceedings . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of an agreement with the lpsc , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. .

Question: what is the growth rate of net revenue from 2014 to 2015 ?
Answer: 0.01639
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 6.0 8.1 .
|( square feet in millions )|unitedstates|othercountries|total|
|owned facilities1|30.7|17.2|47.9|
|leased facilities2|2.1|6.0|8.1|
|total facilities|32.8|23.2|56.0|
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 . a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use . our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china . our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 . additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: what is the percent of the square foot in millions owned facilities in the us to the to owned facilities
Answer: 0.64092
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
||december 31 2008|december 31 2009|december 31 2010|december 31 2011|
|disca|$ 102.53|$ 222.09|$ 301.96|$ 296.67|
|discb|$ 78.53|$ 162.82|$ 225.95|$ 217.56|
|disck|$ 83.69|$ 165.75|$ 229.31|$ 235.63|
|s&p 500|$ 74.86|$ 92.42|$ 104.24|$ 104.23|
|peer group|$ 68.79|$ 100.70|$ 121.35|$ 138.19|
.

Question: the k series stock outperformed the s&p 500 by what percent over 5 years?
Answer: 1.26067
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis regulatory asset associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , in which entergy mississippi agreed not to pursue recovery of the costs deferred by an mpsc order in the new nuclear generation docket . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2014 net revenue|$ 5735|
|retail electric price|187|
|volume/weather|95|
|louisiana business combination customer credits|-107 ( 107 )|
|miso deferral|-35 ( 35 )|
|waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision|-32 ( 32 )|
|other|-14 ( 14 )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 5829|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 formula rate plan increases at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 ; 2022 an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2015 and july 2014 , and new energy efficiency riders at entergy louisiana and entergy mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income ; and 2022 an annual net rate increase at entergy mississippi of $ 16 million , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate and regulatory proceedings . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of an agreement with the lpsc , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. .

Question: in october 2015 , what was the ratio of the entergy recorded a regulatory liability to the tax liability
Answer: 0.62121
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2012 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/07 ) total return analysis .
||12/31/2007|12/31/2008|12/31/2009|12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|
|ball corporation|$ 100.00|$ 93.28|$ 117.01|$ 155.14|$ 164.09|$ 207.62|
|dj us containers & packaging|$ 100.00|$ 61.55|$ 84.76|$ 97.78|$ 96.27|$ 107.76|
|s&p 500|$ 100.00|$ 61.51|$ 75.94|$ 85.65|$ 85.65|$ 97.13|
source : bloomberg l.p . aecharts .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in ball corporation from 2007 to 2012?
Answer: 1.0762
we are not under any obligation ( and expressly disclaim any such obligation ) to update or alter our forward- looking statements , whether as a result of new information , future events or otherwise . you should carefully consider the possibility that actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate headquarters are located in jacksonville , florida , in an owned facility . fnf occupies and pays us rent for approximately 121000 square feet in this facility . we lease office space as follows : number of locations ( 1 ) .
|state|number of locations ( 1 )|
|california|57|
|florida|26|
|georgia|22|
|texas|19|
|minnesota new york|9|
|illinois ohio maryland|8|
|pennsylvania|7|
|other|63|
( 1 ) represents the number of locations in each state listed . we also lease approximately 81 locations outside the united states . we believe our properties are adequate for our business as presently conducted . item 3 . legal proceedings . in the ordinary course of business , we are involved in various pending and threatened litigation matters related to our operations , some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages . we believe that no actions , other than the matters listed below , depart from customary litigation incidental to our business . as background to the disclosure below , please note the following : 2022 these matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities . 2022 we review these matters on an on-going basis and follows the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 5 , 201caccounting for contingencies , 201d when making accrual and disclosure decisions . when assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes , we base our decision on our assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals . the company and certain of its employees were named on march 6 , 2006 as defendants in a civil lawsuit brought by grace & digital information technology co. , ltd . ( 201cgrace 201d ) , a chinese company that formerly acted as a sales agent for alltel information services ( 201cais 201d ) . grace originally filed suit in december 2004 in state court in monterey county , california , alleging that the company breached a sales agency agreement by failing to pay commissions associated with sales contracts signed in 2001 and 2003 . the 2001 contracts were never completed . the 2003 contracts , as to which grace provided no assistance , were for a different project and were executed one and one-half years after grace 2019s sales agency agreement was terminated . in addition to its breach of contract claim , grace also alleged that the company violated the foreign corrupt practices act ( fcpa ) in its dealings with a bank customer in china . the company denied grace 2019s allegations in this california lawsuit. .

Question: what portion of the total leased locations are in texas?
Answer: 0.13194
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .
|year ended december 31 ( in millions )|2009|2008|2007|
|trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments|$ 318063|$ 384102|$ 381415|
|trading assets 2013 derivative receivables|110457|121417|65439|
|trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a )|$ 60224|$ 78841|$ 94737|
|trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables|77901|93200|65198|
( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .

Question: what is the increase of the total trading assets between the years 2007 and 2008 , in millions of dollars?
Answer: 58665.0
the decrease in mortgage servicing rights of $ 2.7 billion was primarily 2022 attributed to mark-to-market losses recognized in the portfolio due to decreases in the mortgage interest rates and increases in refinancing . the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $ 5 2022 billion is driven by a $ 6.2 billion increase from net transfers in as the continued credit crisis impacted the availability of observable inputs for the underlying securities related to this liability . this was offset by a reduction from net settlements of $ 1.4 billion . the decrease in short-term borrowings of $ 3.7 billion is due to net transfers 2022 out of $ 1.8 billion as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined not to be significant to the overall valuation . in addition , net payments of $ 1.8 billion were made during the year . the increase in 2022 long-term debt of $ 2.2 billion is driven by : the net transfers in of $ 38.8 billion , substantially all of which related 2013 to the transfer of consolidated siv debt in the first quarter of 2008 , as the availability of observable inputs continued to decline due to the current crisis ; offset by $ 2.2 billion in gains recognized as credit spreads widened during the 2013 year ; and $ 34.3 billion decrease from net settlements/payments . included in 2013 these settlements were $ 21 billion of payments made on maturing siv debt and the replacement of $ 17 billion of non-recourse , consolidated siv debt classified as level 3 with citigroup debt classified as level 2 . this replacement occurred in connection with the purchase of the siv assets by the company in november 2008 . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , these assets include loans held-for-sale that are measured at locom that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified as level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 ( in billions ) : aggregate cost fair value level 2 level 3 .
||aggregate cost|fair value|level 2|level 3|
|december 31 2009|$ 2.5|$ 1.6|$ 0.3|$ 1.3|
|december 31 2008|3.1|2.1|0.8|1.3|
.

Question: at december 31 2009 what was the ratio of the aggregate cost to the fair value of the loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom
Answer: 1.5625