amphora/finqa_suite huggingface dataset:
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses . 2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .
||( in millions )|
|2003 net revenue|$ 973.7|
|price applied to unbilled sales|-31.9 ( 31.9 )|
|deferred fuel cost revisions|-29.4 ( 29.4 )|
|rate refund provisions|-12.2 ( 12.2 )|
|volume/weather|17.0|
|summer capacity charges|11.8|
|other|2.3|
|2004 net revenue|$ 931.3|
the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds . the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors . the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what are the deferred fuel cost revisions as a percentage of 2004 net revenue?
Answer: -0.03157
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) volume and support incentives the company has agreements with customers for various programs designed to build sales volume and increase the acceptance of its payment products . these agreements , with original terms ranging from one to thirteen years , provide card issuance , marketing and program support based on specific performance requirements . these agreements are designed to encourage customer business and to increase overall visa-branded payment volume , thereby reducing unit transaction processing costs and increasing brand awareness for all visa customers . payments made and obligations incurred under these programs are included on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s obligation under these customer agreements will be amortized as a reduction to revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned , based on management 2019s estimate of the customer 2019s performance compared to the terms of the incentive agreement . the agreements may or may not limit the amount of customer incentive payments . excluding anticipated revenue to be earned from higher payments and transaction volumes in connection with these agreements , the company 2019s potential exposure under agreements with and without limits to incentive payments , is estimated as follows at september 30 , 2008 : fiscal ( in millions ) volume and support incentives .
|fiscal ( in millions )|volume and support incentives|
|2009|$ 1088|
|2010|1105|
|2011|945|
|2012|798|
|2013|1005|
|thereafter|3|
|total|$ 4944|
the ultimate amounts to be paid under these agreements may be greater than or less than the estimates above . based on these agreements , increases in the incentive payments are generally driven by increased payment and transaction volume , and as a result , in the event incentive payments exceed this estimate such payments are not expected to have a material effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . indemnification under framework agreement in connection with the framework agreement entered into between visa inc . and visa europe , visa europe indemnifies visa inc . for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought by visa europe 2019s member banks against visa inc. , while visa inc . indemnifies visa europe for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought against visa europe by visa inc . 2019s customer financial institutions . based on current known facts , the company assessed the probability of loss in the future as remote . consequently , the estimated maximum probability-weighted liability is considered insignificant and no liability has been accrued . for further information with respect to the company 2019s commitments and contingencies also see note 4 2014visa europe , note 5 2014retrospective responsibility plan , note 11 2014debt , note 13 2014settlement guarantee management and note 23 2014legal matters. .

Question: what amount is expected to be paid for support incentives in the next three years?
Answer: 3138.0
the decrease in mortgage servicing rights of $ 2.7 billion was primarily 2022 attributed to mark-to-market losses recognized in the portfolio due to decreases in the mortgage interest rates and increases in refinancing . the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $ 5 2022 billion is driven by a $ 6.2 billion increase from net transfers in as the continued credit crisis impacted the availability of observable inputs for the underlying securities related to this liability . this was offset by a reduction from net settlements of $ 1.4 billion . the decrease in short-term borrowings of $ 3.7 billion is due to net transfers 2022 out of $ 1.8 billion as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined not to be significant to the overall valuation . in addition , net payments of $ 1.8 billion were made during the year . the increase in 2022 long-term debt of $ 2.2 billion is driven by : the net transfers in of $ 38.8 billion , substantially all of which related 2013 to the transfer of consolidated siv debt in the first quarter of 2008 , as the availability of observable inputs continued to decline due to the current crisis ; offset by $ 2.2 billion in gains recognized as credit spreads widened during the 2013 year ; and $ 34.3 billion decrease from net settlements/payments . included in 2013 these settlements were $ 21 billion of payments made on maturing siv debt and the replacement of $ 17 billion of non-recourse , consolidated siv debt classified as level 3 with citigroup debt classified as level 2 . this replacement occurred in connection with the purchase of the siv assets by the company in november 2008 . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , these assets include loans held-for-sale that are measured at locom that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified as level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 ( in billions ) : aggregate cost fair value level 2 level 3 .
||aggregate cost|fair value|level 2|level 3|
|december 31 2009|$ 2.5|$ 1.6|$ 0.3|$ 1.3|
|december 31 2008|3.1|2.1|0.8|1.3|
.

Question: what was the ratio of the net increase in the in securities sold under agreements to repurchase to the net transfers in
Answer: 0.80645
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested . no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock . stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns . comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc . nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .
||july 27 2000|december 29 2000|december 28 2001|december 27 2002|december 26 2003|
|illumina inc .|100.00|100.39|71.44|19.50|43.81|
|nasdaq composite index|100.00|63.84|51.60|35.34|51.73|
|nasdaq pharmaceutical index|100.00|93.20|82.08|51.96|74.57|
.

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total stockholder return percentage for illumina inc . common stock versus the nasdaq pharmaceutical index for the four years end 2003?
Answer: -30.76
management 2019s discussion and analysis 150 jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report wholesale credit portfolio as of december 31 , 2012 , wholesale exposure ( cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 70.9 billion from december 31 , 2011 , primarily driven by increases of $ 52.1 billion in lending- related commitments and $ 30.2 billion in loans due to increased client activity across most regions and most businesses . the increase in loans was due to growth in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 17.5 billion decrease in derivative receivables , primarily related to the decline in the u.s . dollar , and tightening of credit spreads ; these changes resulted in reductions to interest rate , credit derivative , and foreign exchange balances . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( c ) ( d ) .
|december 31 , ( in millions )|december 31 , 2012|december 31 , 2011|2012|2011|
|loans retained|$ 306222|$ 278395|$ 1434|$ 2398|
|loans held-for-sale|4406|2524|18|110|
|loans at fair value|2555|2097|93|73|
|loans 2013 reported|313183|283016|1545|2581|
|derivative receivables|74983|92477|239|297|
|receivables from customers and other ( a )|23648|17461|2014|2014|
|total wholesale credit-related assets|411814|392954|1784|2878|
|lending-related commitments|434814|382739|355|865|
|total wholesale credit exposure|$ 846628|$ 775693|$ 2139|$ 3743|
|credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( b )|$ -27447 ( 27447 )|$ -26240 ( 26240 )|$ -25 ( 25 )|$ -38 ( 38 )|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives|-13658 ( 13658 )|-21807 ( 21807 )|na|na|
receivables from customers and other ( a ) 23648 17461 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 411814 392954 1784 2878 lending-related commitments 434814 382739 355 865 total wholesale credit exposure $ 846628 $ 775693 $ 2139 $ 3743 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( b ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 26240 ) $ ( 25 ) $ ( 38 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 13658 ) ( 21807 ) na na ( a ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( b ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 158 2013159 , and note 6 on pages 218 2013227 of this annual report . ( c ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions . ( d ) prior to the first quarter of 2012 , reported amounts had only included defaulted derivatives ; effective in the first quarter of 2012 , reported amounts in all periods include both defaulted derivatives as well as derivatives that have been risk rated as nonperforming. .

Question: what was the percentage change in lending-related commitments from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.13606
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p small cap 600 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2005 to december 31 , 2010 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .
|company/index|baseperiod 12/31/05|baseperiod 12/31/06|baseperiod 12/31/07|baseperiod 12/31/08|baseperiod 12/31/09|12/31/10|
|a o smith corp|100.0|108.7|103.3|88.8|133.6|178.8|
|s&p small cap 600 index|100.0|115.1|114.8|78.1|98.0|123.8|
|russell 1000 index|100.0|115.5|122.1|76.2|97.9|113.6|
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the difference in the cumulative total return for a o smith corp and the russell 1000 index for the five year period ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 0.652
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .
|fiscal year ended ( 2 )|snap-on incorporated|peer group ( 3 )|s&p 500|
|december 31 2002|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|
|december 31 2003|118.80|126.16|128.68|
|december 31 2004|130.66|152.42|142.69|
|december 31 2005|146.97|157.97|149.70|
|december 31 2006|191.27|185.10|173.34|
|december 31 2007|198.05|216.19|182.87|
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation . ( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w . grainger , inc. .

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Answer: 0.22158
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2012 , we repurchased 619314 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of approximately $ 46.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .
|period|total number of shares purchased ( 1 )|average price paid per share ( 2 )|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans orprograms|approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( in millions )|
|october 2012|27524|$ 72.62|27524|$ 1300.1|
|november 2012|489390|$ 74.22|489390|$ 1263.7|
|december 2012|102400|$ 74.83|102400|$ 1256.1|
|total fourth quarter|619314|$ 74.25|619314|$ 1256.1|
( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in march 2011 ( the 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . ( 2 ) average price per share is calculated using the aggregate price , excluding commissions and fees . we continued to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2011 buyback subsequent to december 31 , 2012 . between january 1 , 2013 and january 21 , 2013 , we repurchased an additional 15790 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the 2011 buyback . as a result , as of january 21 , 2013 , we had repurchased a total of approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock under the 2011 buyback for an aggregate of $ 245.2 million , including commissions and fees . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 1.3 billion under the 2011 buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Question: was was the total amount spent on stock repurchases in december 2012?
Answer: 7662592.0
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . the goldman sachs group , inc . s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .
||12/26/08|12/31/09|12/31/10|12/31/11|12/31/12|12/31/13|
|the goldman sachs group inc .|$ 100.00|$ 224.98|$ 226.19|$ 123.05|$ 176.42|$ 248.36|
|s&p 500 index|100.00|130.93|150.65|153.83|178.42|236.20|
|s&p 500 financials index|100.00|124.38|139.47|115.67|148.92|201.92|
218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for goldman sachs group inc . for the five year period ending 12/31/13?
Answer: 1.4836
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dow jones , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2010 , we repurchased 17556522 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 75.51 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2010 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .
|period|total number ofsharespurchased [a]|averageprice paidper share|total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b]|maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]|
|oct . 1 through oct . 31|725450|84.65|519554|17917736|
|nov . 1 through nov . 30|1205260|89.92|1106042|16811694|
|dec . 1 through dec . 31|1133106|92.59|875000|15936694|
|total|3063816|$ 89.66|2500596|n/a|
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 563220 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on may 1 , 2008 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 40 million shares of our common stock through march 31 , 2011 . we may make these repurchases on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions . on february 3 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 40 million additional shares of our common stock under a new program effective from april 1 , 2011 through march 31 , 2014. .

Question: for the quarter ended december 312010 what was percent of the total number of shares attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices
Answer: 0.18383