I have to share my complaint. The primary reason is not due to the quality of the house, nor its facilities. The owners of the property in question have chosen deliberately and premeditatively to deem the listing of the property as 'own house'.
This indeed is not the case.
The owners in question, in fact, were in-house, they resided in the lower sections of the house for the duration of the stay. The house was not partitioned between the upstairs where we resided and the downstairs where the owners slept, to make matters worse the kitchen was shared and it was obvious that the owners walked through our areas when we were not around to snoop around.
Throughout our stay, it was painfully obvious that the house was occupied. Limiting our movement and our experience.
I deliberately filtered own house only as my method of searching for accommodation.
If the profile was true to reality it would not have listed own house as an option and our search criteria would not have lead to this property chosen.
Yes. They did mention at the end of the profile, the very end of it. That they are in-house. So if they admit that, then why do they allow own house as an option?
It is misleading and not accurate.
We three friends had not seen each other in years and came to meet across different parts of the world.
We wished to cook our own food and enjoy our own company without the limitations of shared housing.
The fees for accommodation thusly are outrageous considering these conditions.
Charging 240 dollars a night for shared accommodation is completely unjustifiable.
It has soured our collective Airbnb experience and made us have less faith in putting serious money on the table for accommodation.