Nicely appointed, but incongruent, that's how I'd describe the space.
A description of a kitchen, but one that is expressly discouraged from being used as such for a full meal by the in house rules on the wall (not the web). The rules themselves probably less of a discouragement than the fact that the kitchen sink is wholly inconvenient from the other elements of what might be termed a small kitchenette at best. One, two, or even three night stays, this might be unnoticeable, but a long stay and it becomes the defining factor of the space.
The focus on surveillance on the property is just next level. It's one thing to announce one has cameras, but I don't believe I've ever seen 5-ish cameras focused on the front area of a property before in literally every direction at which one might enter or exit an entrance. This is after a claim that the neighborhood is safe (which by all looks and feel, it totally is)? If one is trying to protect the property from guests, isn't screening guests accurately essentially the answer? You get the feeling that someone is watching the cameras at all times, tbh.
Then there's the claim of the noise detection device? That's funny because the walls on the unit, are at best, guess paper thin. Throughout the entire stay I had zero issue hearing the conversation of whomever else was on the other sides of the walls of the property as if I was sitting with them in their conversation.
There's nice elements on the property to be sure, and if I was only staying a night or two, maybe that's all I'd care about. But, anything longer than a few nights and the other elements simply make the space less and less appealing and the incongruence of the property really takes over.