For this accommodation you need to consider two things.
The first one is the private room. It was clean and comfy.
The second one is the apartment.
It is located directly in the city center but that is the only good thing.
The house is dirty and shabby. Inside the apartment there are at least 5 guest rooms, 2 bathrooms and a shared kitchen/living room and as always when so many parties share a common space and no one (at least not the hosts) is looking after it regularly it is not in the best condition. The hosts were not at home but in the fridge was moldy food marked with private. The bathrooms have some construction issues such as a toilet that is not fixated in the floor.
All in all it feels like a cheap student hostel for a very high price.
During the stay the host will try to keep your eyes on the good parts with some scheduled messages. Here are two examples:
1. first evening: "as a kind courtesy there is some free breakfast" -> it is a courtesy because you can not offer this kind of breakfast in the ad because everyone would be disappointed
2. the day you leave: a friendly checklist for your evaluation "if there is shampoo and soap in the bathroom, that's 5 stars" and even explaining why he can't do anything about the buildings condition -> in my opinion the pure existence of soap does not make 5 stars and the area you can influence for the better does not end at your door. In apartment houses there are owners meetings, either you are the owner or you give your points to your landlord to discuss them at these meetings. Fixing something should always be of interest for the owners as it will keep the value of the property up for a longer time, but this house and the apartment is looking like someone just squeezing out the last penny and no one is thinking about the future.