Table:
Number of women screened	Cancers detected	Rate of detection	Sensitivities of different screening modalities
Mammography	Ultrasound	M and US	MRI
Family history positive	458	2	0.4%	50%	50%	100%	100%
CHEK2 mutation	353	5	1.4%	60%	80%	100%	100%
No risk factors	2269	16	0.7%	53%	56%	75%	81%
40–49	1022	5	0.5%	60%	80%	100%	100%
50–59	1537	11	0.7%	64%	45%	71%	82%
60–65	436	6	1.4%	40%	67%	83%	830%
All	2995	22	0.7%	57%	59%	82%	86%

Interpret the diagram as Markdown format.

| <ROWSPAN=2>  | <ROWSPAN=2> Number of women screened | <ROWSPAN=2> Cancers detected | <ROWSPAN=2> Rate of detection | <COLSPAN=4> Sensitivities of different screening modalities | 
 | Mammography | Ultrasound | M and US | MRI | 
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 
 | Family history positive | 458 | 2 | 0.4% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 
 | CHEK2 mutation | 353 | 5 | 1.4% | 60% | 80% | 100% | 100% | 
 | No risk factors | 2269 | 16 | 0.7% | 53% | 56% | 75% | 81% | 
 | 40–49 | 1022 | 5 | 0.5% | 60% | 80% | 100% | 100% | 
 | 50–59 | 1537 | 11 | 0.7% | 64% | 45% | 71% | 82% | 
 | 60–65 | 436 | 6 | 1.4% | 40% | 67% | 83% | 830% | 
 | All | 2995 | 22 | 0.7% | 57% | 59% | 82% | 86% |