Table:
Gender	Grade of PC	Specialty	Predicted probability
Men	Senior specialist	Feminized	0.722 203 5
Women	Senior specialist	Feminized	0.675 362 8
Men	Consultant	Feminized	0.256 266 7
Women	Consultant	Feminized	0.216 133 9
Men	Senior consultant	Feminized	0.586 477 8
Women	Senior consultant	Feminized	0.531 594 7
Men	Senior specialist	Parity	0.635 839 5
Women	Senior specialist	Parity	0.582 847 9
Men	Consultant	Parity	0.503 629 7
Women	Consultant	Parity	0.448 098 4
Men	Senior consultant	Parity	0.513 531 5
Women	Senior consultant	Parity	0.457 915 6
Men	Senior specialist	Masculinised	0.638 706 9
Women	Senior specialist	Masculinised	0.585 860 8
Men	Consultant	Masculinised	0.505 287 4
Women	Consultant	Masculinised	0.449 738 9
Men	Senior consultant	Masculinised	0.570 206 8
Women	Senior consultant	Masculinised	0.514 950 3

Transform the illustration into Markdown format.

| Gender | Grade of PC | Specialty | Predicted probability | 
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | 
 | Men | Senior specialist | Feminized | 0.722 203 5 | 
 | Women | Senior specialist | Feminized | 0.675 362 8 | 
 | Men | Consultant | Feminized | 0.256 266 7 | 
 | Women | Consultant | Feminized | 0.216 133 9 | 
 | Men | Senior consultant | Feminized | 0.586 477 8 | 
 | Women | Senior consultant | Feminized | 0.531 594 7 | 
 | Men | Senior specialist | Parity | 0.635 839 5 | 
 | Women | Senior specialist | Parity | 0.582 847 9 | 
 | Men | Consultant | Parity | 0.503 629 7 | 
 | Women | Consultant | Parity | 0.448 098 4 | 
 | Men | Senior consultant | Parity | 0.513 531 5 | 
 | Women | Senior consultant | Parity | 0.457 915 6 | 
 | Men | Senior specialist | Masculinised | 0.638 706 9 | 
 | Women | Senior specialist | Masculinised | 0.585 860 8 | 
 | Men | Consultant | Masculinised | 0.505 287 4 | 
 | Women | Consultant | Masculinised | 0.449 738 9 | 
 | Men | Senior consultant | Masculinised | 0.570 206 8 | 
 | Women | Senior consultant | Masculinised | 0.514 950 3 |