Table:
Populations compareda	Snnb	HSTc
By geographic region
Region A (36) vs. region B (14) vs. region C (10) vs. region D (6)	0.5468*	0.0469**
By host origin
triticale (33) vs. wheat (33)	0.8654**	0.0397**
By year of collection within host origin wheat
Region D 1980’s (6) vs. Region A-B-C 2009–2010	0.7283ns	−0.0025ns
By geographic region within host origin triticale
region A (16) vs. region B (8) vs. region C (9)	0.5899**	0.1008**
region A (16) vs. region B (8)	0.6597ns	0.0019ns
region A (16) vs. region C (9)	0.7667*	0.1116*
region B (8) vs. region C (9)	0.8677*	0.1428*
By pathogenicity
Pathogenic (37) vs. non-pathogenic (29) on triticale	0.9811**	0.0565**

Parse the following content of the illustration in markdown code: | Populations compareda | Snnb | HSTc | 
 | --- | --- | --- | 
 | <COLSPAN=3> By geographic region | 
 | Region A (36) vs. region B (14) vs. region C (10) vs. region D (6) | 0.5468* | 0.0469** | 
 | <COLSPAN=3> By host origin | 
 | triticale (33) vs. wheat (33) | 0.8654** | 0.0397** | 
 | <COLSPAN=3> By year of collection within host origin wheat | 
 | Region D 1980’s (6) vs. Region A-B-C 2009–2010 | 0.7283ns | −0.0025ns | 
 | <COLSPAN=3> By geographic region within host origin triticale | 
 | region A (16) vs. region B (8) vs. region C (9) | 0.5899** | 0.1008** | 
 | region A (16) vs. region B (8) | 0.6597ns | 0.0019ns | 
 | region A (16) vs. region C (9) | 0.7667* | 0.1116* | 
 | region

B (8) vs. region C (9) | 0.8677* | 0.1428* | 
 | <COLSPAN=3> By pathogenicity | 
 | Pathogenic (37) vs. non-pathogenic (29) on triticale | 0.9811** | 0.0565** |