Table:
Loading Device	Sample Size	Survival Rate	Implantation Rate	Pregnancy Rate
Mukaida et al, 2001[8]	Cryoloop	N = 60	63%	--	31%
Cho, 2002 et al [21]	EM grid	N = 21	83%	--	34%
Reed et al, 2002[10]	Cryoloop	N = 54	100%	15%	--
Mukaida et al, 2003[9]	Cryoloop	N = 725	80%	20%	37%
Osada et al, 2003[11]	Cryotop	N = 580	99%	--	56%
Stehlik et al, 2005[12]	Cryotop	N = 41	100%	--	50%
Takahashi et al, 2005[19]	Cryoloop	N = 1129	86%	29%	44%
Kuwayama et al, 2005[18]	Cryotip	N = 5695	90%	--	53%
Liebermann et al, 2006[13]	Cryotop	N = 547	97%	31%	46%
Mukaida et al, 2008[29]	Cryoloop	N = 5412	92%	36%	49%

Transcribe the table into Markdown format.

|  | Loading Device | Sample Size | Survival Rate | Implantation Rate | Pregnancy Rate | 
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 
 | Mukaida et al, 2001[8] | Cryoloop | N = 60 | 63% | -- | 31% | 
 | Cho, 2002 et al [21] | EM grid | N = 21 | 83% | -- | 34% | 
 | Reed et al, 2002[10] | Cryoloop | N = 54 | 100% | 15% | -- | 
 | Mukaida et al, 2003[9] | Cryoloop | N = 725 | 80% | 20% | 37% | 
 | Osada et al, 2003[11] | Cryotop | N = 580 | 99% | -- | 56% | 
 | Stehlik et al, 2005[12] | Cryotop | N = 41 | 100% | -- | 50% | 
 | Takahashi et al, 2005[19] | Cryoloop | N = 1129 | 86% | 29% | 44% | 
 | Kuwayama et al, 2005[18] | Cryotip | N = 5695 | 90% | -- | 53% | 
 | Liebermann et al, 2006[13] | Cryotop | N = 547 | 97% | 31% | 46% | 
 | Mukaida et al, 2008[29] | Cryoloop | N = 5412 | 92% | 36% | 49% |