Table:
All systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions: any flow diagram
N reviews	n flow diagrams (%)	Citation to study relationship (% of all diagrams)	Citation to study relationship: % of all reviews
2001	18	7 (38.9)	2 (28.6)	11.1
2002	22	8 (36.4)	5 (62.5)	22.7
2003	15	8 (53.3)	3 (37.5)	20.0
2004	19	13 (68.4)	6 (46.2)	31.6
2005	13	7 (53.8)	4 (57.1)	30.8
2001–05	87	43 (49.4)	20 (46.5)	23.0
Systematic reviews containing a meta-analysis: any flow diagram
N reviews	n flow diagrams (%)
2001	7	1 (14.3)
2002	10	2 (20)
2003	5	1 (20)
2004	9	5 (55.6)
2005	7	3 (42.9)
2001–05	38	12 (31.6)

Parse the following content of the table in markdown code: | <COLSPAN=5> All systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions: any flow diagram | 
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 
 |  | N reviews | n flow diagrams (%) | Citation to study relationship (% of all diagrams) | Citation to study relationship: % of all reviews | 
 | 2001 | 18 | 7 (38.9) | 2 (28.6) | 11.1 | 
 | 2002 | 22 | 8 (36.4) | 5 (62.5) | 22.7

| 
 | 2003 | 15 | 8 (53.3) | 3 (37.5) | 20.0 | 
 | 2004 | 19 | 13 (68.4) | 6 (46.2) | 31.6 | 
 | 2005 | 13 | 7 (53.8) | 4 (57.1) | 30.8 | 
 | 2001–05 | 87 | 43 (49.4) | 20 (46.5) | 23.0 | 
 | <COLSPAN=5> Systematic reviews containing a meta-analysis: any flow diagram | 
 |  | N reviews | n flow diagrams (%) |  |  | 
 | 2001 | 7 | 1 (14.3) |  |  | 
 | 2002 | 10 | 2 (20) |  |  | 
 | 2003 | 5 | 1 (20) |  |  | 
 | 2004 | 9 | 5 (55.6) |  |  | 
 | 2005 | 7 | 3 (42.9) |  |  | 
 | 2001–05 | 38 | 12 (31.6) |  |  |