total r&d expenditures at federally funded research and development centers, by character of work and ffrdc: fy 2012
Table:
ffrdc
sponsor
location
all r&d expenditures
basic research (%)
applied research (%)
development

all ffrdcs

17446036
35.2
30.7
34.1

university administered

5174091
41.7
26.8
31.5

ames lab
doe
ames, ia
33853
70.6
25.6
3.7

argonne national lab
doe
argonne, il
679387
44.9
27.1
28

fermi national accelerator lab
doe
batavia, il
412438
100
0
0

jet propulsion lab
nasa
pasadena, ca
1493613
10
10
80

lawrence berkeley national lab
doe
berkeley, ca
767554
73.3
26.6
0.1

lincoln lab
dod, osd
lexington, ma
873104
0
90.7
9.3

national ctr. for atmospheric research
nsf
boulder, co
169743
49.1
16.4
34.5

national optical astronomy observatories
nsf
tucson, az
46557
100
0
0

national radio astronomy observatory
nsf
charlottesville, va
79168
90.3
6.4
3.4

princeton plasma physics lab
doe
princeton, nj
81389
100
0
0

slac national accelerator lab
doe
stanford, ca
329747
100
0
0

software engineering institute
dod, osd
pittsburgh, pa
113371
0
13.2
86.8

thomas jefferson national accelerator facility
doe
newport news, va
94167
100
0
0

nonprofit administered

5464141
28.1
29.1
42.9

aerospace ffrdc
dod, air force
el segundo, ca
39746
6.7
76.5
16.9

arroyo ctr
dod, army
santa monica, ca
31278
0
100
0

brookhaven national lab
doe
upton, ny
516921
77.8
10
12.2

ctr. for advanced aviation system development
dot, faa
mclean, va
159311
0
5.1
94.9

ctr. for communications and computing
dod, nsa/css
alexandria, va
62600
25
50
25

ctr. for enterprise modernization
treasury (irs), va
mclean, va
226539
0
5.5
94.5

ctr. for naval analyses
dod, navy
alexandria, va
91628
0
100
0

ctr. for nuclear waste regulatory analyses
nrc
san antonio, tx
13147
0
100
0

homeland security studies and analysis institute
dhs
arlington, va
30213
0
100
0

homeland security systems engineering and development institute
dhs
mclean, va
77159
0
2.4
97.6

national biodefense analysis and countermeasures ctr
dhs
frederick, md
31201
0
100
0

national defense research institute
dod, osd
santa monica, ca
53832
0
100
0

national renewable energy lab
doe
golden, co
398873
4.3
19.4
76.3

national security engineering ctr
dod, osd
bedford, ma; mclean, va
946737
0
5.2
94.8

oak ridge national lab
doe
oak ridge, tn
1553460
55.6
44.4
0

pacific northwest national lab
doe
richland, wa
1033768
22.4
18.2
59.5

project air force
dod, air force
santa monica, ca
41031
0
100
0

science and technology policy institute
nsf
washington, dc
7547
0
100
0

studies and analyses ctr
dod, osd
alexandria, va
149150
0
100
0

industry administered

6807804
35.9
35.1
29

frederick national lab. for cancer research
nih
frederick, md
430100
11.1
88.9
0

id national lab
doe
idaho falls, id
536399
6
51
43

judiciary engineering and modernization ctr
u.s. courts
mclean, va
5309
0
5.6
94.4

lawrence livermore national lab
doe
livermore, ca
1353454
12.3
74.3
13.4

los alamos national lab
doe
los alamos, nm
2056878
100
0
0

sandia national labs
doe
albuquerque, nm
2293307
5.9
28.7
65.4

savannah river national lab
doe
aiken, sc
132357
5
50
45

Give a precise answer to the following question using only the table information. Enclose the answer in the list of the following JSON object {"answer": ["YOUR ANSWER"]}. If more than one item applies, separate items with commas. Caption of the table: 'total r&d expenditures at federally funded research and development centers, by character of work and ffrdc: fy 2012'. Now answer the following question based on the table information: The type of work performed across the ffrdcs was fairly evenly distributed between applied research, how many percent of total expenditures in fy 2012?

{"answer": ["30.7"]}