Semantic segmentation architectures are mainly built upon an encoder-decoder structure. These models perform subsequent downsampling operations in the encoder. Since operations on high-resolution activation maps are computationally expensive, usually the decoder produces output segmentation maps by upsampling with parameters-free operators like bilinear or nearest-neighbor. We propose a Neural Network named Guided Upsampling Network which consists of a multiresolution architecture that jointly exploits high-resolution and large context information. Then we introduce a new module named Guided Upsampling Module (GUM) that enriches upsampling operators by introducing a learnable transformation for semantic maps. It can be plugged into any existing encoder-decoder architecture with little modifications and low additional computation cost. We show with quantitative and qualitative experiments how our network benefits from the use of GUM module. A comprehensive set of experiments on the publicly available Cityscapes dataset demonstrates that Guided Upsampling Network can efficiently process high-resolution images in real-time while attaining state-of-the art performances.
@cite_15 @cite_20 @cite_24 represent the pioneer works that employed CNNs for semantic segmentation. FCN @cite_22 laid the foundations for modern architectures where CNNs are employed in a fully-convolutional way. Authors used a pre-trained encoder together with a simple decoder module that takes advantage of skip-connections from lower layers to exploit high-resolution feature maps. They obtained a significant improvement both in terms of accuracy and efficiency. DeepLab @cite_27 made use of Dilated Convolutions @cite_19 to increase the receptive field of inner layers without increasing the overall number of parameters. After the introduction of Residual Networks (Resnets) @cite_17 most methods employed a very deep Resnet as encoder DeepLabv2 @cite_10 Resnet38 @cite_7 FRRN @cite_25 , pushing forward the performance boundary on semantic segmentation task. PSPNet @cite_3 and DeepLabv3 @cite_21 introduced context layers in order to expand the theoretical receptive field of inner layers. All these methods attain high accuracy on different benchmarks but at high computational costs.
@cite_22 @cite_7 @cite_21 @cite_3 @cite_24 @cite_19 @cite_27 @cite_15 @cite_10 @cite_25 @cite_20 @cite_17
2952632681 2952147788 2787091153 2952596663 2286929393 1923697677 2102605133 2950668883 2949650786
In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Citation relationship between scientific publications has been successfully used for scholarly bibliometrics, information retrieval and data mining tasks, and citation-based recommendation algorithms are well documented. While previous studies investigated citation relations from various viewpoints, most of them share the same assumption that, if paper1 cites paper2 (or author1 cites author2), they are connected, regardless of citation importance, sentiment, reason, topic, or motivation. However, this assumption is oversimplified. In this study, we employ an innovative "context-rich heterogeneous network" approach, which paves a new way for citation recommendation task. In the network, we characterize 1) the importance of citation relationships between citing and cited papers, and 2) the topical citation motivation. Unlike earlier studies, the citation information, in this paper, is characterized by citation textual contexts extracted from the full-text citing paper. We also propose algorithm to cope with the situation when large portion of full-text missing information exists in the bibliographic repository. Evaluation results show that, context-rich heterogeneous network can significantly enhance the citation recommendation performance.