Deep learning models have achieved huge success in numerous fields, such as computer vision and natural language processing. However, unlike such fields, it is hard to apply traditional deep learning models on the graph data due to the node-orderless' property. Normally, we use an adjacent matrix to represent a graph, but an artificial and random node-order will be cast on the graphs, which renders the performance of deep models extremely erratic and not robust. In order to eliminate the unnecessary node-order constraint, in this paper, we propose a novel model named Isomorphic Neural Network (IsoNN), which learns the graph representation by extracting its isomorphic features via the graph matching between input graph and templates. IsoNN has two main components: graph isomorphic feature extraction component and classification component. The graph isomorphic feature extraction component utilizes a set of subgraph templates as the kernel variables to learn the possible subgraph patterns existing in the input graph and then computes the isomorphic features. A set of permutation matrices is used in the component to break the node-order brought by the matrix representation. To further lower down the computational cost and identify the optimal subgraph patterns, IsoNN adopts two min-pooling layers to find the optimal matching. The first min-pooling layer aims at finding the best permutation matrix, whereas the second one is used to determine the best templates for the input graph data. Three fully-connected layers are used as the classification component in IsoNN. Extensive experiments are conducted on real-world datasets, and the experimental results demonstrate both the effectiveness and efficiency of IsoNN.
Graph classification is an important problem with many practical applications. Data like social networks, chemical compounds, brain networks can be represented as graphs naturally and they can have applications such as community detection @cite_31 , anti-cancer activity identification @cite_30 @cite_2 and Alzheimer's patients diagnosis @cite_32 @cite_33 respectively. Traditionally, researchers mine the subgraphs by DFS or BFS @cite_16 @cite_24 , and use them as the features. With the rapid development of deep learning (DL), many works are done based on DL methods. GAM builds the model by RNN with self-attention mechanism @cite_5 . DCNN extend CNN to general graph-structured data by introducing a ‘diffusion-convolution’ operation @cite_27 .
@cite_30 @cite_33 @cite_32 @cite_24 @cite_27 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_31 @cite_16
2962995121 2273249530 2963984147 2809343047 2788919350 2148611932
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach – ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets – a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a self‐citation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation – using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings – ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ...