Let @math be a fixed integer and let @math be the number of @math -colourings of the graph @math . For certain values of the average degree, the random variable @math is known to be concentrated in the sense that @math converges to @math in probability [Achlioptas and Coja-Oghlan: FOCS 2008]. In the present paper we prove a significantly stronger concentration result. Namely, we show that for a wide range of average degrees, @math converges to @math in probability for any diverging function @math . For @math exceeding a certain constant @math this result covers all average degrees up to the so-called condensation phase transition, and this is best possible. As an application, we show that the experiment of choosing a @math -colouring of the random graph @math uniformly at random is contiguous with respect to the so-called "planted model".
We expect that the present approach of combining the second moment method with small subgraph conditioning can be applied successfully to a variety of other random constraint problems. Immediate examples that spring to mind include random @math -NAESAT or random @math -XORSAT, random hypergraph @math -colourability or, more generally, the family of problems studied in @cite_19 . (On the other hand, we expect that in problems such as random @math -SAT the logarithm of the number of satisfying assignments exhibits stronger fluctuations, due to a lack of symmetry.)
@cite_19
1818081266
Many NP-complete constraint satisfaction problems appear to undergo a “phase transition” from solubility to insolubility when the constraint density passes through a critical threshold. In all such cases it is easy to derive upper bounds on the location of the threshold by showing that above a certain density the first moment (expectation) of the number of solutions tends to zero. We show that in the case of certain symmetric constraints, considering the second moment of the number of solutions yields nearly matching lower bounds for the location of the threshold. Specifically, we prove that the threshold for both random hypergraph 2-colorability (Property B) and random Not-All-Equal @math -SAT is @math . As a corollary, we establish that the threshold for random @math -SAT is of order @math , resolving a long-standing open problem. Over the past decade, physicists have developed deep but non-rigorous techniques for studying phase transitions in discrete structures. Recently, their ideas have been harnessed to obtain improved rigorous results on the phase transitions in binary problems such as random @math -SAT or @math -NAESAT (e.g., Coja-Oghlan and Panagiotou: STOC 2013). However, these rigorous arguments, typically centered around the second moment method, do not extend easily to problems where there are more than two possible values per variable. The single most intensely studied example of such a problem is random graph @math -coloring. Here we develop a novel approach to the second moment method in this problem. This new method, inspired by physics conjectures on the geometry of the set of @math -colorings, allows us to establish a substantially improved lower bound on the @math -colorability threshold. The new lower bound is within an additive @math of a simple first-moment upper bound and within @math of the physics conjecture. By comparison, the best previous lower bound left a gap of about @math , unbounded in terms of the number of colors [Achlioptas, Naor: STOC 2004]. Random constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are known to exhibit threshold phenomena: given a uniformly random instance of a CSP with @math variables and @math clauses, there is a value of @math beyond which the CSP will be unsatisfiable with high probability. Strong refutation is the problem of certifying that no variable assignment satisfies more than a constant fraction of clauses; this is the natural algorithmic problem in the unsatisfiable regime (when @math ). Intuitively, strong refutation should become easier as the clause density @math grows, because the contradictions introduced by the random clauses become more locally apparent. For CSPs such as @math -SAT and @math -XOR, there is a long-standing gap between the clause density at which efficient strong refutation algorithms are known, @math , and the clause density at which instances become unsatisfiable with high probability, @math . In this paper, we give spectral and sum-of-squares algorithms for strongly refuting random @math -XOR instances with clause density @math in time @math or in @math rounds of the sum-of-squares hierarchy, for any @math and any integer @math . Our algorithms provide a smooth transition between the clause density at which polynomial-time algorithms are known at @math , and brute-force refutation at the satisfiability threshold when @math . We also leverage our @math -XOR results to obtain strong refutation algorithms for SAT (or any other Boolean CSP) at similar clause densities. Our algorithms match the known sum-of-squares lower bounds due to Grigoriev and Schonebeck, up to logarithmic factors. Additionally, we extend our techniques to give new results for certifying upper bounds on the injective tensor norm of random tensors. This paper considers stochastic optimization problems whose objective functions involve powers of random variables. For example, consider the classic Stochastic lp Load Balancing Problem (SLBp): There are @math machines and @math jobs, and known independent random variables @math decribe the load incurred on machine @math if we assign job @math to it. The goal is to assign each jobs to machines in order to minimize the expected @math -norm of the total load on the machines. While convex relaxations represent one of the most powerful algorithmic tools, in problems such as SLBp the main difficulty is to capture the objective function in a way that only depends on each random variable separately. We show how to capture @math -power-type objectives in such separable way by using the @math -function method, introduced by Lata a to relate the moment of sums of random variables to the individual marginals. We show how this quickly leads to a constant-factor approximation for very general subset selection problem with @math -moment objective. Moreover, we give a constant-factor approximation for SLBp, improving on the recent @math -approximation of [, SODA 18]. Here the application of the method is much more involved. In particular, we need to sharply connect the expected @math -norm of a random vector with the @math -moments of its marginals (machine loads), taking into account simultaneously the different scales of the loads that are incurred by an unknown assignment.