Many automatic attribute discovery methods have been developed to extract a set of visual attributes from images for various tasks. However, despite good performance in some image classification tasks, it is difficult to evaluate whether these methods discover meaningful attributes and which one is the best to find the attributes for image descriptions. An intuitive way to evaluate this is to manually verify whether consistent identifiable visual concepts exist to distinguish between positive and negative images of an attribute. This manual checking is tedious, labor intensive and expensive and it is very hard to get quantitative comparisons between different methods. In this work, we tackle this problem by proposing an attribute meaningfulness metric, that can perform automatic evaluation on the meaningfulness of attribute sets as well as achieving quantitative comparisons. We apply our proposed metric to recent automatic attribute discovery methods and popular hashing methods on three attribute datasets. A user study is also conducted to validate the effectiveness of the metric. In our evaluation, we gleaned some insights that could be beneficial in developing automatic attribute discovery methods to generate meaningful attributes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to quantitatively measure the semantic content of automatically discovered attributes.
A more cost-effective, less labor intensive and time consuming method is to develop an automatic approach to evaluate the meaningfulness of the set of discovered attributes. In their work, Parikh and Grauman @cite_7 assumed that there is shared structured among meaningful attributes. They proposed an active learning approach that uses probabilistic principal component analyzers (MPPCA) @cite_36 to predict how likely the visual division created by an attribute is nameable. Note that, when an attribute is nameable, it is assumed to be meaningful. Nevertheless, it is not clear how to use their approach to perform a quantitative measurement, as the predictor only decides whether an attribute is nameable or not. In addition, their method is semi-automatic as human intervention is required in the process. Thus, their method is not suitable for addressing our goal (i.e., to automatically evaluate the meaningfulness of attribute sets).
@cite_36 @cite_7
2146610201 2084435358
Automatic video keyword generation is one of the key ingredients in reducing the burden of security officers in analyzing surveillance videos. Keywords or attributes are generally chosen manually based on expert knowledge of surveillance. Most existing works primarily aim at either supervised learning approaches relying on extensive manual labelling or hierarchical probabilistic models that assume the features are extracted using the bag-of-words approach; thus limiting the utilization of the other features. To address this, we turn our attention to automatic attribute discovery approaches. However, it is not clear which automatic discovery approach can discover the most meaningful attributes. Furthermore, little research has been done on how to compare and choose the best automatic attribute discovery methods. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, based on the shared structure exhibited amongst meaningful attributes, that enables us to compare between different automatic attribute discovery approaches. We then validate our approach by comparing various attribute discovery methods such as PiCoDeS on two attribute datasets. The evaluation shows that our approach is able to select the automatic discovery approach that discovers the most meaningful attributes. We then employ the best discovery approach to generate keywords for videos recorded from a surveillance system. This work shows it is possible to massively reduce the amount of manual work in generating video keywords without limiting ourselves to a particular video feature descriptor. Human-name able visual attributes offer many advantages when used as mid-level features for object recognition, but existing techniques to gather relevant attributes can be inefficient (costing substantial effort or expertise) and or insufficient (descriptive properties need not be discriminative). We introduce an approach to define a vocabulary of attributes that is both human understandable and discriminative. The system takes object scene-labeled images as input, and returns as output a set of attributes elicited from human annotators that distinguish the categories of interest. To ensure a compact vocabulary and efficient use of annotators' effort, we 1) show how to actively augment the vocabulary such that new attributes resolve inter-class confusions, and 2) propose a novel "nameability" manifold that prioritizes candidate attributes by their likelihood of being associated with a nameable property. We demonstrate the approach with multiple datasets, and show its clear advantages over baselines that lack a name-ability model or rely on a list of expert-provided attributes. We present an active learning approach to choose image annotation requests among both object category labels and the objects' attribute labels. The goal is to solicit those labels that will best use human effort when training a multi-class object recognition model. In contrast to previous work in active visual category learning, our approach directly exploits the dependencies between human-nameable visual attributes and the objects they describe, shifting its requests in either label space accordingly. We adopt a discriminative latent model that captures object-attribute and attribute-attribute relationships, and then define a suitable entropy reduction selection criterion to predict the influence a new label might have throughout those connections. On three challenging datasets, we demonstrate that the method can more successfully accelerate object learning relative to both passive learning and traditional active learning approaches. Aesthetic image analysis is the study and assessment of the aesthetic properties of images. Current computational approaches to aesthetic image analysis either provide accurate or interpretable results. To obtain both accuracy and interpretability by humans, we advocate the use of learned and nameable visual attributes as mid-level features. For this purpose, we propose to discover and learn the visual appearance of attributes automatically, using a recently introduced database, called AVA, which contains more than 250,000 images together with their aesthetic scores and textual comments given by photography enthusiasts. We provide a detailed analysis of these annotations as well as the context in which they were given. We then describe how these three key components of AVA--images, scores, and comments--can be effectively leveraged to learn visual attributes. Lastly, we show that these learned attributes can be successfully used in three applications: aesthetic quality prediction, image tagging and retrieval.