We present an approach for object segmentation in videos that combines frame-level object detection with concepts from object tracking and motion segmentation. The approach extracts temporally consistent object tubes based on an off-the-shelf detector. Besides the class label for each tube, this provides a location prior that is independent of motion. For the final video segmentation, we combine this information with motion cues. The method overcomes the typical problems of weakly supervised unsupervised video segmentation, such as scenes with no motion, dominant camera motion, and objects that move as a unit. In contrast to most tracking methods, it provides an accurate, temporally consistent segmentation of each object. We report results on four video segmentation datasets: YouTube Objects, SegTrackv2, egoMotion, and FBMS.
Unsupervised video segmentation is usually based on motion to a certain degree. In motion segmentation, motion is the only feature for localizing objects. Ochs al @cite_13 and Keuper @cite_32 cluster long term point trajectories. Papazoglou and Ferrari @cite_10 use optical flow to compute so-called inside-outside maps, partitioning the frames into foreground and background. Yang al @cite_0 use motion to detect disoccluded areas and assign them to the correct object. The common drawback of pure motion segmentation is the need for distinct motion of the objects and the background. Lee al @cite_41 employ object proposals @cite_37 to enhance motion cues with a set of static features. A sequence of min-cuts generates the figure ground segments in the work of Li al @cite_16 . Multiple paths connecting the segments are extracted and post-processed, resulting in a set of multiple possible segmentations. Dong al @cite_17 enforce the temporal consistency of object proposals via optical flow. Wang &Wang @cite_11 discover reoccurring objects in the video, from which they estimate a holistic model. Yang al @cite_14 estimate the appearance and the segmentation simultaneously by adding auxiliary nodes to the Markov random field model.
@cite_13 @cite_37 @cite_11 @cite_14 @cite_41 @cite_32 @cite_0 @cite_16 @cite_10 @cite_17
2076756823 1555385401 2237427287 2213486648 1989348325 2197046994 2138682569 2113708607 2155598147
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. In moving camera videos, motion segmentation is commonly performed using the image plane motion of pixels, or optical flow. However, objects that are at different depths from the camera can exhibit different optical flows even if they share the same real-world motion. This can cause a depth-dependent segmentation of the scene. Our goal is to develop a segmentation algorithm that clusters pixels that have similar real-world motion irrespective of their depth in the scene. Our solution uses optical flow orientations instead of the complete vectors and exploits the well-known property that under camera translation, optical flow orientations are independent of object depth. We introduce a probabilistic model that automatically estimates the number of observed independent motions and results in a labeling that is consistent with real-world motion in the scene. The result of our system is that static objects are correctly identified as one segment, even if they are at different depths. Color features and information from previous frames in the video sequence are used to correct occasional errors due to the orientation-based segmentation. We present results on more than thirty videos from different benchmarks. The system is particularly robust on complex background scenes containing objects at significantly different depths. We segment moving objects in videos by ranking spatio-temporal segment proposals according to "moving objectness": how likely they are to contain a moving object. In each video frame, we compute segment proposals using multiple figure-ground segmentations on per frame motion boundaries. We rank them with a Moving Objectness Detector trained on image and motion fields to detect moving objects and discard over under segmentations or background parts of the scene. We extend the top ranked segments into spatio-temporal tubes using random walkers on motion affinities of dense point trajectories. Our final tube ranking consistently outperforms previous segmentation methods in the two largest video segmentation benchmarks currently available, for any number of proposals. Further, our per frame moving object proposals increase the detection rate up to 7 over previous state-of-the-art static proposal methods. We segment moving objects in videos by ranking spatio-temporal segment proposals according to “moving objectness”; how likely they are to contain a moving object. In each video frame, we compute segment proposals using multiple figure-ground segmentations on per frame motion boundaries. We rank them with a Moving Objectness Detector trained on image and motion fields to detect moving objects and discard over under segmentations or background parts of the scene. We extend the top ranked segments into spatio-temporal tubes using random walkers on motion affinities of dense point trajectories. Our final tube ranking consistently outperforms previous segmentation methods in the two largest video segmentation benchmarks currently available, for any number of proposals. Further, our per frame moving object proposals increase the detection rate up to 7 over previous state-of-the-art static proposal methods.