A scalable framework is developed to allocate radio resources across a large number of densely deployed small cells with given traffic statistics on a slow timescale. Joint user association and spectrum allocation is first formulated as a convex optimization problem by dividing the spectrum among all possible transmission patterns of active access points (APs). To improve scalability with the number of APs, the problem is reformulated using local patterns of interfering APs. To maintain global consistency among local patterns, inter-cluster interaction is characterized as hyper-edges in a hyper-graph with nodes corresponding to neighborhoods of APs. A scalable solution is obtained by iteratively solving a convex optimization problem for bandwidth allocation with reduced complexity and constructing a global spectrum allocation using hyper-graph coloring. Numerical results demonstrate the proposed solution for a network with 100 APs and several hundred user equipments. For a given quality of service (QoS), the proposed scheme can increase the network capacity several fold compared to assigning each user to the strongest AP with full-spectrum reuse.
@cite_5 , a slow-timescale model similar to the model considered in this paper was proposed. User association and spectrum allocation are jointly optimized to maximize the sum rate under proportional fairness constraints. There are two major differences between @cite_5 and our approach here. First, we allow rather realistic stochastic traffic, whereas @cite_5 is limited to backlogged traffic and rate maximization. Second, the proposed algorithm in @cite_5 avoids exponential complexity by limiting to a small number of global patterns a priori . Here, the proposed scalable solution includes all possible patterns as candidates.
@cite_5
2329681656
In this paper we study the resource allocation problem for the multiuser orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)-based cognitive radio (CR) systems with proportional rate constraints. The mutual interference introduced by primary user (PU) and cognitive radio user (also referred to secondary user, SU) makes the optimization problem of CR systems more complex. Moreover, the interference introduced to PUs must be kept under a given threshold. In this paper, the highest achievable rate of each OFDM subchannel is calculated by jointly considering the channel gain and interference level. First, a subchannel is assigned to the SU with the highest achievable rate. The remaining subchannels are always allocated to the SU that suffers the severest unjustness. Second, an efficient bit allocation algorithm is developed to maximize the sum capacity, which is again based on the highest achievable rate of each subchannel. Finally, an adjustment procedure is designed to maintain proportional fairness. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm maximizes the sum capacity while keeping the proportional rate constraints satisfied. The algorithm exhibits a good tradeoff between sum capacity maximization and proportional fairness. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm has lower complexity compared with other algorithms, rendering it promising for practical applications. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (By jointly considering the channel gain and the interference level of the OFDM-based cognitive radio systems, the highest achievable rate of each subchannel can be calculated, which indicates the ability of carrying bits of the subchannel. Using the normalized cost index list, an efficient algorithm is proposed to maximize the sum capacity of the cognitive OFDM systems while keeping the proportional rate constraints satisfied.) Previous research indicates that during the past 20 years, the highest-quality work has been published in an increasingly diverse and larger group of journals. In this article, we examine whether this diversification has also affected the handful of elite journals that are traditionally considered to be the best. We examine citation patterns during the past 40 years of seven long-standing traditionally elite journals and six journals that have been increasing in importance during the past 20 years. To be among the top 5 or 1 cited papers, papers now need about twice as many citations as they did 40 years ago. Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, elite journals have been publishing a decreasing proportion of these top-cited papers. This also applies to the two journals that are typically considered as the top venues and often used as bibliometric indicators of "excellence": Science and Nature. On the other hand, several new and established journals are publishing an increasing proportion of the most-cited papers. These changes bring new challenges and opportunities for all parties. Journals can enact policies to increase or maintain their relative position in the journal hierarchy. Researchers now have the option to publish in more diverse venues knowing that their work can still reach the same audiences. Finally, evaluators and administrators need to know that although there will always be a certain prestige associated with publishing in "elite" journals, journal hierarchies are in constant flux. This work studies centralized slow-timescale spectrum management in metropolitan area networks with a very large number of access points (APs) and user equipments (UEs). The joint spectrum allocation and user association problem is first formulated as a convex optimization problem with an exponential number of variables in the network size. A scalable reformulation is obtained by exploiting the geometric graph nature of the network and provable sparsity of the optimal solution. A pattern pursuit algorithm with low complexity is proposed to solve the reformulated problem with guaranteed gap to the global optimum. Efficient algorithms are developed to obtain near-optimal allocations for a network with up to 1000 APs and 2500 active users. Numerical results show that the proposed solution achieves significant gains in terms of delay and throughput over existing schemes and is within 7 to the global optimum in a typical scenario. Historically, papers have been physically bound to the journal in which they were published; but in the digital age papers are available individually, no longer tied to their respective journals. Hence, papers now can be read and cited based on their own merits, independently of the journal's physical availability, reputation, or impact factor (IF). We compare the strength of the relationship between journals' IFs and the actual citations received by their respective papers from 1902 to 2009. Throughout most of the 20th century, papers' citation rates were increasingly linked to their respective journals' IFs. However, since 1990, the advent of the digital age, the relation between IFs and paper citations has been weakening. This began first in physics, a field that was quick to make the transition into the electronic domain. Furthermore, since 1990 the overall proportion of highly cited papers coming from highly cited journals has been decreasing and, of these highly cited papers, the proportion not coming from highly cited journals has been increasing. Should this pattern continue, it might bring an end to the use of the IF as a way to evaluate the quality of journals, papers, and researchers. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.