The role of unique node identifiers in network computing is well understood as far as symmetry breaking is concerned. However, the unique identifiers also leak information about the computing environment - in particular, they provide some nodes with information related to the size of the network. It was recently proved that in the context of local decision, there are some decision problems such that (1) they cannot be solved without unique identifiers, and (2) unique node identifiers leak a sufficient amount of information such that the problem becomes solvable (PODC 2013). In this work we give study what is the minimal amount of information that we need to leak from the environment to the nodes in order to solve local decision problems. Our key results are related to scalar oracles @math that, for any given @math , provide a multiset @math of @math labels; then the adversary assigns the labels to the @math nodes in the network. This is a direct generalisation of the usual assumption of unique node identifiers. We give a complete characterisation of the weakest oracle that leaks at least as much information as the unique identifiers. Our main result is the following dichotomy: we classify scalar oracles as large and small, depending on their asymptotic behaviour, and show that (1) any large oracle is at least as powerful as the unique identifiers in the context of local decision problems, while (2) for any small oracle there are local decision problems that still benefit from unique identifiers.
In the context of network computing, oracles and advice commonly appear in the form of @cite_2 @cite_17 . A typical example is a , which is a labelling of the nodes so that the distance between any pair of nodes can be computed or approximated based on the labels. Other examples are that label the nodes with information that helps in finding a short path between any given source and destination. For graph problems, one could of course encode the entire solution in the advice string---hence the key question is whether a very small amount of advice helps with solving a given problem.
@cite_17 @cite_2
1502033971 2020965855
We study the problem of the amount of information required to perform fast broadcasting in tree networks. The source located at the root of a tree has to disseminate a message to all nodes. In each round each informed node can transmit to one child. Nodes do not know the topology of the tree but an oracle knowing it can give a string of bits of advice to the source which can then pass it down the tree with the source message. The quality of a broadcasting algorithm with advice is measured by its competitive ratio: the worst case ratio, taken over n-node trees, between the time of this algorithm and the optimal broadcasting time in the given tree. Our goal is to find a trade-off between the size of advice and the best competitive ratio of a broadcasting algorithm for n-node trees. We establish such a trade-off with an approximation factor of O(n e ), for an arbitrarily small positive constant e. This is the first communication problem for which a trade-off between the size of advice and the efficiency of the solution is shown for arbitrary size of advice. In topology recognition, each node of an anonymous network has to deterministically produce an isomorphic copy of the underlying graph, with all ports correctly marked. This task is usually unfeasible without any a priori information. Such information can be provided to nodes as advice. An oracle knowing the network can give a (possibly different) string of bits to each node, and all nodes must reconstruct the network using this advice, after a given number of rounds of communication. During each round each node can exchange arbitrary messages with all its neighbors and perform arbitrary local computations. The time of completing topology recognition is the number of rounds it takes, and the size of advice is the maximum length of a string given to nodes.We investigate tradeoffs between the time in which topology recognition is accomplished and the minimum size of advice that has to be given to nodes. We provide upper and lower bounds on the minimum size of advice that is sufficient to perform topology recognition in a given time, in the class of all graphs of size n and diameter D ? α n , for any constant α < 1 . In most cases, our bounds are asymptotically tight. We study the problem of the amount of information (advice) about a graph that must be given to its nodes in order to achieve fast distributed computations. The required size of the advice enables to measure the information sensitivity of a network problem. A problem is information sensitive if little advice is enough to solve the problem rapidly (i.e., much faster than in the absence of any advice), whereas it is information insensitive if it requires giving a lot of information to the nodes in order to ensure fast computation of the solution. In this paper, we study the information sensitivity of distributed graph coloring. Topology recognition is one of the fundamental distributed tasks in networks. Each node of an anonymous network has to deterministically produce an isomorphic copy of the underlying graph, with all ports correctly marked. This task is usually unfeasible without any a priori information. Such information can be provided to nodes as advice. An oracle knowing the network can give a possibly different string of bits to each node, and all nodes must reconstruct the network using this advice, after a given number of rounds of communication. During each round each node can exchange arbitrary messages with all its neighbors and perform arbitrary local computations. The time of completing topology recognition is the number of rounds it takes, and the size of advice is the maximum length of a string given to nodes. We investigate tradeoffs between the time in which topology recognition is accomplished and the minimum size of advice that has to be given to nodes. We provide upper and lower bounds on the minimum size of advice that is sufficient to perform topology recognition in a given time, in the class of all graphs of size n and diameter D≤αn, for any constant α<1. In most cases, our bounds are asymptotically tight. More precisely, if the allotted time is D-k, where 0<k≤D, then the optimal size of advice is i¾?n 2 logn D-k+1. If the allotted time is D, then this optimal size is i¾?n logn. If the allotted time is D+k, where 0<k≤D 2, then the optimal size of advice is i¾?1+logn k. The only remaining gap between our bounds is for time D+k, where D 2<k≤D. In this time interval our upper bound remains O1+logn k, while the lower bound that holds for any time is 1. This leaves a gap if D∈ologn. Finally, we show that for time 2D+1, one bit of advice is both necessary and sufficient. Our results show how sensitive is the minimum size of advice to the time allowed for topology recognition: allowing just one round more, from D to D+1, decreases exponentially the advice needed to accomplish this task.