Machine learning has proven to be useful in classification and segmentation of images. In this paper, we evaluate a training methodology for pixel-wise segmentation on high resolution satellite images using progressive growing of generative adversarial networks. We apply our model to segmenting building rooftops and compare these results to conventional methods for rooftop segmentation. We present our findings using the SpaceNet version 2 dataset. Progressive GAN training achieved a test accuracy of 93 compared to 89 for traditional GAN training.
Significant accomplishments have been made in computer vision, resulting in increasingly effective state of the art methods for image processing @cite_17 @cite_15 . Early efforts in automatic rooftop segmentation relied on techniques to generate candidate rooftops and subsequent evaluation to accept or reject candidate rooftops. Edge detection, corner detection, and segmentation into homogeneous regions via k-means clustering or support Vector Machines (SVM) have been used to identify candidate rooftops @cite_6 @cite_34 . Discriminative features used to evaluate candidate rooftops include building shadows, geometry and spectral characteristics @cite_28 @cite_4 . Several approaches have used LIDAR alone or in addition to multi-spectral images @cite_21 @cite_10 @cite_14
@cite_14 @cite_4 @cite_28 @cite_21 @cite_6 @cite_15 @cite_34 @cite_10 @cite_17
2890631531 2059844114 2069436126 1994197589 2963234238 2077999820 2583615817
A new method for detecting rooftops in satellite images is presented. The proposed method is based on a combination of machine learning techniques, namely, k-means clustering and support vector machines (SVM). Firstly k-means clustering is used to segment the image into a set of rooftop candidates—these are homogeneous regions in the image which are potentially associated with rooftop areas. Next, the candidates are submitted to a classification stage which determines which amongst them correspond to “true” rooftops. To achieve improved accuracy, a novel two-pass classification process is used. In the first pass, a trained SVM is used in the normal way to distinguish between rooftop and nonrooftop regions. However, this can be a challenging task, resulting in a relatively high rate of misclassification. Hence, the second pass, which we call the “histogram method,” was devised with the aim of detecting rooftops which were missed in the first pass. The performance of the model is assessed both in terms of the percentage of correctly classified candidates as well as the accuracy of the estimated rooftop area. This paper presents a novel application of machine learning techniques to the automatic detection of building rooftops in satellite images. The image is first segmented into homogeneous regions using the k-means algorithm. These segments are then treated as candidate rooftop regions which are presented to a novel two-stage classification process, features are extracted from each segment and submitted to an ANN which serves as the first stage of the classification procedure. New features are then extracted from the outputs of the ANN and these are presented to an SVM which then performs the second classification pass. In this way, the first classification stage acts as a preprocessing step which, when processed by the SVM significantly reduces the number of false-positives. To establish the efficacy of the proposed method, its results are compared with those obtained using an alternative approach. A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 .