In this paper, we focus on a novel knowledge reuse scenario where the knowledge in the source schema needs to be translated to a semantically heterogeneous target schema. We refer to this task as "knowledge translation" (KT). Unlike data translation and transfer learning, KT does not require any data from the source or target schema. We adopt a probabilistic approach to KT by representing the knowledge in the source schema, the mapping between the source and target schemas, and the resulting knowledge in the target schema all as probability distributions, specially using Markov random fields and Markov logic networks. Given the source knowledge and mappings, we use standard learning and inference algorithms for probabilistic graphical models to find an explicit probability distribution in the target schema that minimizes the Kullback-Leibler divergence from the implicit distribution. This gives us a compact probabilistic model that represents knowledge from the source schema as well as possible, respecting the uncertainty in both the source knowledge and the mapping. In experiments on both propositional and relational domains, we find that the knowledge obtained by KT is comparable to other approaches that require data, demonstrating that knowledge can be reused without data.
Data integration and exchange (e.g., @cite_0 ) are the mostly studied areas in semantic integration. The main task of data integration and exchange is to answer queries posed in terms of the global schema given source databases. The standard semantics of global query answering is to return the tuples in every possible database that is consistent with the global schema constraints and the mapping, i.e., the set of certain answers .
@cite_0
1992673035
Intuitively, data management and data integration tools should be well suited for exchanging information in a semantically meaningful way. Unfortunately, they suffer from two significant problems: they typically require a common and comprehensive schema design before they can be used to store or share information, and they are difficult to extend because schema evolution is heavyweight and may break backward compatibility. As a result, many large-scale data sharing tasks are more easily facilitated by non-database-oriented tools that have little support for semantics.The goal of the peer data management system (PDMS) is to address this need: we propose the use of a decentralized, easily extensible data management architecture in which any user can contribute new data, schema information, or even mappings between other peers’ schemas. PDMSs represent a natural step beyond data integration systems, replacing their single logical schema with an interlinked collection of semantic mappings between peers’ individual schemas.This paper considers the problem of schema mediation in a PDMS. Our first contribution is a flexible language for mediating between peer schemas that extends known data integration formalisms to our more complex architecture. We precisely characterize the complexity of query answering for our language. Next, we describe a reformulation algorithm for our language that generalizes both global-as-view and local-as-view query answering algorithms. Then we describe several methods for optimizing the reformulation algorithm and an initial set of experiments studying its performance. Finally, we define and consider several global problems in managing semantic mappings in a PDMS. Data exchange is the problem of taking data structured under a source schema and creating an instance of a target schema that reflects the source data as accurately as possible. In this paper, we address foundational and algorithmic issues related to the semantics of data exchange and to the query answering problem in the context of data exchange. These issues arise because, given a source instance, there may be many target instances that satisfy the constraints of the data exchange problem.We give an algebraic specification that selects, among all solutions to the data exchange problem, a special class of solutions that we call universal. We show that a universal solution has no more and no less data than required for data exchange and that it represents the entire space of possible solutions. We then identify fairly general, yet practical, conditions that guarantee the existence of a universal solution and yield algorithms to compute a canonical universal solution efficiently. We adopt the notion of the "certain answers" in indefinite databases for the semantics for query answering in data exchange. We investigate the computational complexity of computing the certain answers in this context and also address other algorithmic issues that arise in data exchange. In particular, we study the problem of computing the certain answers of target queries by simply evaluating them on a canonical universal solution, and we explore the boundary of what queries can and cannot be answered this way, in a data exchange setting. MystiQ is a system that uses probabilistic query semantics [3] to find answers in large numbers of data sources of less than perfect quality. There are many reasons why the data originating from many different sources may be of poor quality, and therefore difficult to query: the same data item may have different representation in different sources; the schema alignments needed by a query system are imperfect and noisy; different sources may contain contradictory information, and, in particular, their combined data may violate some global integrity constraints; fuzzy matches between objects from different sources may return false positives or negatives. Even in such environment, users some-times want to ask complex, structurally rich queries, using query constructs typically found in SQL queries: joins, subqueries, existential universal quantifiers, aggregate and group-by queries: for example scientists may use such queries to query multiple scientific data sources, or a law enforcement agency may use it in order to find rare associations from multiple data sources. If standard query semantics were applied to such queries, all but the most trivial queries will return an empty answer. The detection of duplicate tuples, corresponding to the same real-world entity, is an important task in data integration and cleaning. While many techniques exist to identify such tuples, the merging or elimination of duplicates can be a difficult task that relies on ad-hoc and often manual solutions. We propose a complementary approach that permits declarative query answering over duplicated data, where each duplicate is associated with a probability of being in the clean database. We rewrite queries over a database containing duplicates to return each answer with the probability that the answer is in the clean database. Our rewritten queries are sensitive to the semantics of duplication and help a user understand which query answers are most likely to be present in the clean database. The semantics that we adopt is independent of the way the probabilities are produced, but is able to effectively exploit them during query answering. In the absence of external knowledge that associates each database tuple with a probability, we offer a technique, based on tuple summaries, that automates this task. We experimentally study the performance of our rewritten queries. Our studies show that the rewriting does not introduce a significant overhead in query execution time. This work is done in the context of the ConQuer project at the University of Toronto, which focuses on the efficient management of inconsistent and dirty databases.