Most of object detection algorithms can be categorized into two classes: two-stage detectors and one-stage detectors. For two-stage detectors, a region proposal phase can filter massive background candidates in the first stage and it masks the classification task more balanced in the second stage. Recently, one-stage detectors have attracted much attention due to its simple yet effective architecture. Different from two-stage detectors, one-stage detectors have to identify foreground objects from all candidates in a single stage. This architecture is efficient but can suffer from the imbalance issue with respect to two aspects: the imbalance between classes and that in the distribution of background, where only a few candidates are hard to be identified. In this work, we propose to address the challenge by developing the distributional ranking (DR) loss. First, we convert the classification problem to a ranking problem to alleviate the class-imbalance problem. Then, we propose to rank the distribution of foreground candidates above that of background ones in the constrained worst-case scenario. This strategy not only handles the imbalance in background candidates but also improves the efficiency for the ranking algorithm. Besides the classification task, we also improve the regression loss by gradually approaching the @math loss as suggested in interior-point methods. To evaluate the proposed losses, we replace the corresponding losses in RetinaNet that reports the state-of-the-art performance as a one-stage detector. With the ResNet-101 as the backbone, our method can improve mAP on COCO data set from @math to @math by only changing the loss functions and it verifies the effectiveness of the proposed losses.
Detection is a fundamental task in computer vision. In conventional methods, hand crafted features, e.g., HOG @cite_3 and SIFT @cite_7 , are used for detection either with a sliding-window strategy which holds a dense set of candidates, e.g., DPM @cite_2 or with a region proposal method which keeps a sparse set of candidates, e.g., Selective Search @cite_8 . Recently, since deep neural networks have shown the dominating performance in classification tasks @cite_11 , the features obtained from neural networks are leveraged for detection tasks.
@cite_7 @cite_8 @cite_3 @cite_2 @cite_11
2151103935 2088049833 2161969291 2120419212 2163605009
In this paper, we propose a two-step method to recognize multiple-food images by detecting candidate regions with several methods and classifying them with various kinds of features. In the first step, we detect several candidate regions by fusing outputs of several region detectors including Felzenszwalb's deformable part model (DPM) [1], a circle detector and the JSEG region segmentation. In the second step, we apply a feature-fusion-based food recognition method for bounding boxes of the candidate regions with various kinds of visual features including bag-of-features of SIFT and CSIFT with spatial pyramid (SP-BoF), histogram of oriented gradient (HoG), and Gabor texture features. In the experiments, we estimated ten food candidates for multiple-food images in the descending order of the confidence scores. As results, we have achieved the 55.8 classification rate, which improved the baseline result in case of using only DPM by 14.3 points, for a multiple-food image data set. This demonstrates that the proposed two-step method is effective for recognition of multiple-food images. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . Citation relationship between scientific publications has been successfully used for scholarly bibliometrics, information retrieval and data mining tasks, and citation-based recommendation algorithms are well documented. While previous studies investigated citation relations from various viewpoints, most of them share the same assumption that, if paper1 cites paper2 (or author1 cites author2), they are connected, regardless of citation importance, sentiment, reason, topic, or motivation. However, this assumption is oversimplified. In this study, we employ an innovative "context-rich heterogeneous network" approach, which paves a new way for citation recommendation task. In the network, we characterize 1) the importance of citation relationships between citing and cited papers, and 2) the topical citation motivation. Unlike earlier studies, the citation information, in this paper, is characterized by citation textual contexts extracted from the full-text citing paper. We also propose algorithm to cope with the situation when large portion of full-text missing information exists in the bibliographic repository. Evaluation results show that, context-rich heterogeneous network can significantly enhance the citation recommendation performance. A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results.