Nowadays, social media has become a popular platform for the public to share photos. To make photos more visually appealing, users usually apply filters on their photos without domain knowledge. However, due to the growing number of filter types, it becomes a major issue for users to choose the best filter type. For this purpose, filter recommendation for photo aesthetics takes an important role in image quality ranking problems. In these years, several works have declared that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) outperform traditional methods in image aesthetic categorization, which classifies images into high or low quality. Most of them do not consider the effect on filtered images; hence, we propose a novel image aesthetic learning for filter recommendation. Instead of binarizing image quality, we adjust the state-of-the-art CNN architectures and design a pairwise loss function to learn the embedded aesthetic responses in hidden layers for filtered images. Based on our pilot study, we observe image categories (e.g., portrait, landscape, food) will affect user preference on filter selection. We further integrate category classification into our proposed aesthetic-oriented models. To the best of our knowledge, there is no public dataset for aesthetic judgment with filtered images. We create a new dataset called Filter Aesthetic Comparison Dataset (FACD). It contains 28,160 filtered images based on the AVA dataset and 42,240 reliable image pairs with aesthetic annotations using Amazon Mechanical Turk. It is the first dataset containing filtered images and user preference labels. We conduct experiments on the collected FACD for filter recommendation, and the results show that our proposed category-aware aesthetic learning outperforms aesthetic classification methods (e.g., 12 relative improvement).
Moreover, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has been applied on IQA problem recently. AlexNet @cite_19 , a breakthrough in computer vision using CNN, greatly outperformed the state-of-the-art methods which used handcrafted features before 2012. In these years, many variations of network structures have been presented, such as GoogLeNet @cite_1 , VGG @cite_21 and Network-In-Network @cite_23 . These models achieve great performance in ILSVRC, which focuses on image classification, object recognition and localization. However, the purpose of image aesthetic learning is very different from object detection. The difference between them leads to the performance gap for a model applied on distinct domains. To deal with this problem, specific models should be designed for aesthetic learning. In @cite_33 @cite_30 , Lu et al also notice that general architectures are not suitable for image quality classification which depends on both local and global information. They conduct experiments on network architectures by adjusting the number of layers. Eventually, they construct a CNN RAPID net @cite_33 with four convolutional layers followed by three fully-connected layers for aesthetic learning specially. This structure is leveraged for advanced methods in this paper.
@cite_30 @cite_33 @cite_21 @cite_1 @cite_19 @cite_23
2009678853 1686810756 2950179405 2953106684
Convolutional neural network (CNN) has achieved the state-of-the-art performance in many different visual tasks. Learned from a large-scale training data set, CNN features are much more discriminative and accurate than the handcrafted features. Moreover, CNN features are also transferable among different domains. On the other hand, traditional dictionary-based features (such as BoW and spatial pyramid matching) contain much more local discriminative and structural information, which is implicitly embedded in the images. To further improve the performance, in this paper, we propose to combine CNN with dictionary-based models for scene recognition and visual domain adaptation (DA). Specifically, based on the well-tuned CNN models (e.g., AlexNet and VGG Net), two dictionary-based representations are further constructed, namely, mid-level local representation (MLR) and convolutional Fisher vector (CFV) representation. In MLR, an efficient two-stage clustering method, i.e., weighted spatial and feature space spectral clustering on the parts of a single image followed by clustering all representative parts of all images, is used to generate a class-mixture or a class-specific part dictionary. After that, the part dictionary is used to operate with the multiscale image inputs for generating mid-level representation. In CFV, a multiscale and scale-proportional Gaussian mixture model training strategy is utilized to generate Fisher vectors based on the last convolutional layer of CNN. By integrating the complementary information of MLR, CFV, and the CNN features of the fully connected layer, the state-of-the-art performance can be achieved on scene recognition and DA problems. An interested finding is that our proposed hybrid representation (from VGG net trained on ImageNet) is also complementary to GoogLeNet and or VGG-11 (trained on Place205) greatly. In this paper we investigate the aesthetic image classification problem, also known as automatically classifying an image into low or high aesthetic quality, which is quite a challenging problem. Considering both the local and global information of images is quite important for image aesthetic quality assessment. Currently, a powerful inception module is proposed which shows very high performance in object classification. We have the observation that the inception module has the ability of considering both the local and global features in nature. Thus, in this paper, we propose a novel DCNN structure codenamed ILGNet for image aesthetics classification, which introduces the Inception module and connects intermediate Local layers to the Global layer for the output. In addition, the ILGNet is derived from part of the GoogLeNet. Thus, we can easily use a pre-trained image classification GoogleLeNet model on the ImageNet dataset and fine tune our connected local and global layer on the large scale aesthetics assessment AVA dataset. The experimental results show that the proposed ILGNet outperforms the state of the art results in image aesthetics assessment in the AVA benchmark. The time cost of both training and test of the ILGNet are significantly less than those of full GoogLeNet with only a little reduction of the classification accuracy. Our ILGNet can achieve similar classification accuracy as that of 2 3 GoogLeNet, whose computational cost is nearly twice of ours. This makes the aesthetic assessment model more easily to be integrated into mobile and embedded systems. At present, designing convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures requires both human expertise and labor. New architectures are handcrafted by careful experimentation or modified from a handful of existing networks. We introduce MetaQNN, a meta-modeling algorithm based on reinforcement learning to automatically generate high-performing CNN architectures for a given learning task. The learning agent is trained to sequentially choose CNN layers using @math -learning with an @math -greedy exploration strategy and experience replay. The agent explores a large but finite space of possible architectures and iteratively discovers designs with improved performance on the learning task. On image classification benchmarks, the agent-designed networks (consisting of only standard convolution, pooling, and fully-connected layers) beat existing networks designed with the same layer types and are competitive against the state-of-the-art methods that use more complex layer types. We also outperform existing meta-modeling approaches for network design on image classification tasks. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach – ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets – a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a self‐citation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation – using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings – ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ...