The OneMax problem is a standard benchmark optimisation problem for a binary search space. Recent work on applying a Bandit-Based Random Mutation Hill-Climbing algorithm to the noisy OneMax Problem showed that it is important to choose a good value for the resampling number to make a careful trade off between taking more samples in order to reduce noise, and taking fewer samples to reduce the total computational cost. This paper extends that observation, by deriving an analytical expression for the running time of the RMHC algorithm with resampling applied to the noisy OneMax problem, and showing both theoretically and empirically that the optimal resampling number increases with the number of dimensions in the search space.
Droste @cite_6 defined a model for the OneMax problem, in which during every fitness evaluation of the bit-string @math , there was exactly one uniformly-chosen random bit mis-read with probability @math . Hence the measured noisy fitness values are equivalent to replacing the Gaussian noise term in by an appropriate discrete random variable taking values from @math . Under this scheme, Droste showed that (1+1)-EA with mutation probability @math could optimise a @math -bit OneMax problem corrupted by , with high probability, in polynomial time if @math is @math .
@cite_6
1569002781
We study the well-known black-box optimisation algorithm (1+1)-EA on a novel type of noise model. In our noise model, the fitness function is linear with positive weights, but the absolute values of the weights may fluctuate in each round. Thus in every state, the fitness function indicates that one-bits are preferred over zero-bits. In particular, hillclimbing heuristics should be able to find the optimum fast. We show that the (1+1)-EA indeed finds the optimum in time @math if the mutation parameter is @math for a constant @math However, we also show that for @math the (1+1)-EA needs superpolynomial time to find the optimum. Thus the choice of mutation parameter is critical even for optimisation tasks in which there is a clear path to the the optimum. A similar threshold phenomenon has recently been shown for noise-free monotone fitness functions. The ( @math 1+ź) EA with mutation probability c n, where @math c>0 is an arbitrary constant, is studied for the classical OneMax function. Its expected optimization time is analyzed exactly (up to lower order terms) as a function of c and @math ź. It turns out that 1 n is the only optimal mutation probability if @math ź=o(lnnlnlnn lnlnlnn), which is the cut-off point for linear speed-up. However, if @math ź is above this cut-off point then the standard mutation probability 1 n is no longer the only optimal choice. Instead, the expected number of generations is (up to lower order terms) independent of c, irrespectively of it being less than 1 or greater. The theoretical results are obtained by a careful study of order statistics of the binomial distribution and variable drift theorems for upper and lower bounds. Experimental supplements shed light on the optimal mutation probability for small problem sizes. We prove the first nontrivial (superlinear) lower bound in the noisy broadcast model, defined by El Gamal in [Open problems presented at the @math workshop on Specific Problems in Communication and Computation sponsored by Bell Communication Research, in Open Problems in Communication and Computation, T. M. Cover and B. Gopinath, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987, pp. 60-62]. In this model there are @math processors @math , each of which is initially given a private input bit @math . The goal is for @math to learn the value of @math , for some specified function @math , using a series of noisy broadcasts. At each step a designated processor broadcasts one bit to all of the other processors, and the bit received by each processor is flipped with fixed probability (independently for each recipient). In 1988, Gallager [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 34 (1988), pp. 176-180] gave a noise-resistant protocol that allows @math to learn the entire input with constant probability in @math broadcasts. We prove that Gallager's protocol is optimal, up to a constant factor. Our lower bound follows by reduction from a lower bound for generalized noisy decision trees, a new model which may be of independent interest. For this new model we show a lower bound of @math on the depth of a tree that learns the entire input. While the above lower bound is for an @math -bit function, we also show an @math lower bound for the number of broadcasts required to compute certain explicit boolean-valued functions, when the correct output must be attained with probability at least @math for a constant parameter @math (this bound applies to all threshold functions as well as any other boolean-valued function with linear sensitivity). This bound also follows by reduction from a lower bound of @math on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute the same functions with the same error. We also show a (nontrivial) @math lower bound on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute such functions with small constant error. Finally, we show the first protocol in the noisy broadcast model that computes the Hamming weight of the input using a linear number of broadcasts. We solve the dynamic Predecessor Problem with high probability (whp) in constant time, using only @math bits of memory, for any constant @math . The input keys are random wrt a wider class of the well studied and practically important class of @math -smooth distributions introduced in and:mat . It achieves O(1) whp amortized time. Its worst-case time is @math . Also, we prove whp @math time using only @math bits. Finally, we show whp @math time using O(n) space.