In this paper we present Collaborative Low-Rank Subspace Clustering. Given multiple observations of a phenomenon we learn a unified representation matrix. This unified matrix incorporates the features from all the observations, thus increasing the discriminative power compared with learning the representation matrix on each observation separately. Experimental evaluation shows that our method outperforms subspace clustering on separate observations and the state of the art collaborative learning algorithm.
The work most closely related and which inspires our work is the so called Multi-Task Low-rank Affinity Pursuit (MLAP) @cite_41 . MLAP adopts the low-rank representation model for each individual observation and fuses them together by seeking sparsity consistent low-rank coefficients. The MLAP objective is the following where @math , @math and @math are observation data, the fitting error and coefficient matrices for the @math th observation respectively, @math is the number of observations, the @math norm is defined as @math , @math and @math is the vectorisation operator such that @math .
@cite_41
1968691112
Recovering a low-rank tensor from incomplete information is a recurring problem in signal processing and machine learning. The most popular convex relaxation of this problem minimizes the sum of the nuclear norms of the unfoldings of the tensor. We show that this approach can be substantially suboptimal: reliably recovering a @math -way tensor of length @math and Tucker rank @math from Gaussian measurements requires @math observations. In contrast, a certain (intractable) nonconvex formulation needs only @math observations. We introduce a very simple, new convex relaxation, which partially bridges this gap. Our new formulation succeeds with @math observations. While these results pertain to Gaussian measurements, simulations strongly suggest that the new norm also outperforms the sum of nuclear norms for tensor completion from a random subset of entries. Our lower bound for the sum-of-nuclear-norms model follows from a new result on recovering signals with multiple sparse structures (e.g. sparse, low rank), which perhaps surprisingly demonstrates the significant suboptimality of the commonly used recovery approach via minimizing the sum of individual sparsity inducing norms (e.g. @math , nuclear norm). Our new formulation for low-rank tensor recovery however opens the possibility in reducing the sample complexity by exploiting several structures jointly. The problem of finding @math matrices (with @math ) of rank @math in a real affine subspace of dimension n has many applications in information and systems theory, where low rank is synonymous of structure and parsimony. We design computer algebra algorithms to solve this problem efficiently and exactly: the input are the rational coefficients of the matrices spanning the affine subspace as well as the expected maximum rank, and the output is a rational parametrization encoding a finite set of points that intersects each connected component of the low rank real algebraic set. The complexity of our algorithm is studied thoroughly. It is essentially polynomial in @math ; it improves on the state-of-the-art in the field. Moreover, computer experiments show the practical efficiency of our approach. In sparse principal component analysis we are given noisy observations of a low-rank matrix of dimension @math and seek to reconstruct it under additional sparsity assumptions. In particular, we assume here each of the principal components @math has at most @math non-zero entries. We are particularly interested in the high dimensional regime wherein @math is comparable to, or even much larger than @math . In an influential paper, johnstone2004sparse introduced a simple algorithm that estimates the support of the principal vectors @math by the largest entries in the diagonal of the empirical covariance. This method can be shown to identify the correct support with high probability if @math , and to fail with high probability if @math for two constants @math . Despite a considerable amount of work over the last ten years, no practical algorithm exists with provably better support recovery guarantees. Here we analyze a covariance thresholding algorithm that was recently proposed by KrauthgamerSPCA . On the basis of numerical simulations (for the rank-one case), these authors conjectured that covariance thresholding correctly recover the support with high probability for @math (assuming @math of the same order as @math ). We prove this conjecture, and in fact establish a more general guarantee including higher-rank as well as @math much smaller than @math . Recent lower bounds berthet2013computational, ma2015sum suggest that no polynomial time algorithm can do significantly better. The key technical component of our analysis develops new bounds on the norm of kernel random matrices, in regimes that were not considered before. Low-rank approximation is a common tool used to accelerate kernel methods: the @math kernel matrix @math is approximated via a rank- @math matrix @math which can be stored in much less space and processed more quickly. In this work we study the limits of computationally efficient low-rank kernel approximation. We show that for a broad class of kernels, including the popular Gaussian and polynomial kernels, computing a relative error @math -rank approximation to @math is at least as difficult as multiplying the input data matrix @math by an arbitrary matrix @math . Barring a breakthrough in fast matrix multiplication, when @math is not too large, this requires @math time where @math is the number of non-zeros in @math . This lower bound matches, in many parameter regimes, recent work on subquadratic time algorithms for low-rank approximation of general kernels [MM16,MW17], demonstrating that these algorithms are unlikely to be significantly improved, in particular to @math input sparsity runtimes. At the same time there is hope: we show for the first time that @math time approximation is possible for general radial basis function kernels (e.g., the Gaussian kernel) for the closely related problem of low-rank approximation of the kernelized dataset.