In this work, we present a method for unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA), where we aim to transfer knowledge from a label-rich domain (i.e., a source domain) to an unlabeled domain (i.e., a target domain). Many adversarial learning methods have been proposed for this task. These methods train domain classifier networks (i.e., a discriminator) to discriminate distinguish the features as either a source or target and train a feature generator network to mimic the discriminator.However, the domain classifier only tries to distinguish the features as a source or target and thus does not consider task-specific decision boundaries between classes. Therefore, a trained generator can generate ambiguous features near class boundaries. To solve the problem, we propose a new approach that attempts to align distributions of source and target by utilizing the task-specific decision boundaries. We propose to utilize task-specific classifiers as discriminators that try to detect target samples that are far from the support of the source. A feature generator learns to generate target features inside the support to fool the classifiers. Since the generator uses feedback from task-specific classifiers, it avoids generating target features near class boundaries. Our method outperforms other methods on several datasets of image classification and semantic segmentation.
Training CNN for DA can be realized through various strategies. Ghifary al proposed using an autoencoder for the target domain to obtain domain-invariant features @cite_16 . Sener al proposed using clustering techniques and pseudo-labels to obtain discriminative features @cite_36 . Taigman al proposed cross-domain image translation methods @cite_29 . Matching distributions of the middle features in CNN is considered to be effective in realizing an accurate adaptation. To this end, numerous methods have been proposed @cite_26 @cite_39 @cite_24 @cite_33 @cite_17 @cite_31 .
@cite_26 @cite_33 @cite_36 @cite_29 @cite_39 @cite_24 @cite_31 @cite_16 @cite_17
2751528152 2551835155 2467286621 2953127297 2173393671 1565327149
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . Historically, papers have been physically bound to the journal in which they were published; but in the digital age papers are available individually, no longer tied to their respective journals. Hence, papers now can be read and cited based on their own merits, independently of the journal's physical availability, reputation, or impact factor (IF). We compare the strength of the relationship between journals' IFs and the actual citations received by their respective papers from 1902 to 2009. Throughout most of the 20th century, papers' citation rates were increasingly linked to their respective journals' IFs. However, since 1990, the advent of the digital age, the relation between IFs and paper citations has been weakening. This began first in physics, a field that was quick to make the transition into the electronic domain. Furthermore, since 1990 the overall proportion of highly cited papers coming from highly cited journals has been decreasing and, of these highly cited papers, the proportion not coming from highly cited journals has been increasing. Should this pattern continue, it might bring an end to the use of the IF as a way to evaluate the quality of journals, papers, and researchers. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text.