In this paper, we study optimal radar deployment for intrusion detection, with focus on network coverage. In contrast to the disk-based sensing model in a traditional sensor network, the detection range of a bistatic radar depends on the locations of both the radar transmitter and radar receiver, and is characterized by Cassini ovals. Furthermore, in a network with multiple radar transmitters and receivers, since any pair of transmitter and receiver can potentially form a bistatic radar, the detection ranges of different bistatic radars are coupled and the corresponding network coverage is intimately related to the locations of all transmitters and receivers, making the optimal deployment design highly non-trivial. Clearly, the detectability of an intruder depends on the highest SNR received by all possible bistatic radars. We focus on the worst-case intrusion detectability, i.e., the minimum possible detectability along all possible intrusion paths. Although it is plausible to deploy radars on a shortest line segment across the field, it is not always optimal in general, which we illustrate via counter-examples. We then present a sufficient condition on the field geometry for the optimality of shortest line deployment to hold. Further, we quantify the local structure of detectability corresponding to a given deployment order and spacings of radar transmitters and receivers, building on which we characterize the optimal deployment to maximize the worst-case intrusion detectability. Our results show that the optimal deployment locations exhibit a balanced structure. We also develop a polynomial-time approximation algorithm for characterizing the worse-case intrusion path for any given locations of radars under random deployment.
Worst-case coverage has been first studied in @cite_3 for a traditional sensor network. Polynomial-time algorithms are devised to find maximum breach and maximum support paths between two locations. An efficient algorithm is proposed in @cite_2 to solve the best-coverage problem raised in @cite_3 . In @cite_15 , efficient algorithms are developed to find the minimum exposure path in sensor networks. Localized algorithms are designed in @cite_7 to solve the minimum exposure path problem. A new coverage measure that captures both the best and worst-case coverage is studied in @cite_11 . The deployment problem to improve the maximal breach path is considered by @cite_5 @cite_0 . Barrier coverage is an intimately related problem to worst-case coverage. The concept of weak and strong barrier coverage has been introduced in @cite_8 , where critical condition of weak barrier coverage is obtained for random deployment. The critical condition of strong barrier coverage is derived in @cite_13 using percolation theory. An effective metric of barrier coverage quality is proposed in @cite_9 . @cite_10 studies constructing barrier by sensors with limited mobility after initial deployment. A novel full-view coverage model is proposed in @cite_14 for constructing barrier in camera sensor networks.
@cite_14 @cite_7 @cite_8 @cite_10 @cite_9 @cite_3 @cite_0 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_13 @cite_11
1967174914 2080863621 1591006909 2156174635 2068735295
When a sensor network is deployed to detect objects penetrating a protected region, it is not necessary to have every point in the deployment region covered by a sensor. It is enough if the penetrating objects are detected at some point in their trajectory. If a sensor network guarantees that every penetrating object will be detected by at least k distinct sensors before it crosses the barrier of wireless sensors, we say the network provides k-barrier coverage. In this paper, we develop theoretical foundations for k-barrier coverage. We propose efficient algorithms using which one can quickly determine, after deploying the sensors, whether the deployment region is k-barrier covered. Next, we establish the optimal deployment pattern to achieve k-barrier coverage when deploying sensors deterministically. Finally, we consider barrier coverage with high probability when sensors are deployed randomly. The major challenge, when dealing with probabilistic barrier coverage, is to derive critical conditions using which one can compute the minimum number of sensors needed to ensure barrier coverage with high probability. Deriving critical conditions for k-barrier coverage is, however, still an open problem. We derive critical conditions for a weaker notion of barrier coverage, called weak k-barrier coverage. Barrier coverage is a critical issue in wireless sensor networks for various battlefield and homeland security applications. The goal is to effectively detect intruders that attempt to penetrate the region of interest. A sensor barrier is formed by a connected sensor cluster across the entire deployed region, acting as a "trip wire" to detect any crossing intruders. In this paper we study how to efficiently improve barrier coverage using mobile sensors with limited mobility. After the initial deployment, mobile sensors can move to desired locations and connect with other sensors in order to create new barriers. However, simply moving sensors to form a large local cluster does not necessarily yield a global barrier. This global nature of barrier coverage makes it a challenging task to devise effective sensor mobility schemes. Moreover, a good sensor mobility scheme should efficiently improve barrier coverage under the constraints of available mobile sensors and their moving range. We first explore the fundamental limits of sensor mobility on barrier coverage and present a sensor mobility scheme that constructs the maximum number of barriers with minimum sensor moving distance. We then present an efficient algorithm to compute the existence of barrier coverage with sensors of limited mobility, and examine the effects of the number of mobile sensors and their moving ranges on the barrier coverage improvement. Both the analytical results and performance of the algorithms are evaluated via extensive simulations. We study the problem of achieving maximum barrier coverage by sensors on a barrier modeled by a line segment, by moving the minimum possible number of sensors, initially placed at arbitrary positions on the line containing the barrier. We consider several cases based on whether or not complete coverage is possible, and whether non-contiguous coverage is allowed in the case when complete coverage is impossible. When the sensors have unequal transmission ranges, we show that the problem of finding a minimum-sized subset of sensors to move in order to achieve maximum contiguous or non-contiguous coverage on a finite line segment barrier is NP-complete. In contrast, if the sensors all have the same range, we give efficient algorithms to achieve maximum contiguous as well as non-contiguous coverage. For some cases, we reduce the problem to finding a maximum-hop path of a certain minimum (maximum) weight on a related graph, and solve it using dynamic programming. Global barrier coverage that requires much fewer sensors than full coverage, is known to be an appropriate model of coverage for movement detection applications such as intrusion detection. However, it has been proved that given a sensor deployment, sensors can not locally determine whether the deployment provides global barrier coverage, making it impossible to develop localized algorithms, thus limiting its use in practice. In this paper, we introduce the concept of local barrier coverage to address this limitation. Motivated by the observation that movements are likely to follow a shorter path in crossing a belt region, local barrier coverage guarantees the detection of all movements whose trajectory is confined to a slice of the belt region of deployment. We prove that it is possible for individual sensors to locally determine the existence of local barrier coverage, even when the region of deployment is arbitrarily curved. Although local barrier coverage does not always guarantee global barrier coverage, we show that for thin belt regions, local barrier coverage almost always provides global barrier coverage. To demonstrate that local barrier coverage can be used to design localized algorithms, we develop a novel sleep-wakeup algorithm for maximizing the network lifetime, called Localized Barrier Coverage Protocol (LBCP). We show that LBCP provides close to optimalenhancement in network lifetime, while providing global barrier coverage most of the time. It outperforms an existing algorithm called Randomized Independent Sleeping (RIS) by up to 6 times.