Recent work has addressed using formulas in linear temporal logic (LTL) as specifications for agents planning in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We consider the inverse problem: inferring an LTL specification from demonstrated behavior trajectories in MDPs. We formulate this as a multiobjective optimization problem, and describe state-based ("what actually happened") and action-based ("what the agent expected to happen") objective functions based on a notion of "violation cost". We demonstrate the efficacy of the approach by employing genetic programming to solve this problem in two simple domains.
Apprenticeship learning, the problem of learning correct behavior by observing the policies or behavioral trajectories of one or more experts, has predominantly been accomplished by (IRL) @cite_11 @cite_20 . IRL algorithms generally compute a reward function that explains'' the observed trajectories (typically, by maximally differentiating them from random behavior). Complete discussion of the many types of IRL algorithms is beyond the scope of this paper. The proposed approach bears some resemblance to IRL, particularly in its inputs (sets of finite behavioral trajectories). Instead of computing a reward function based on the observed trajectories, however, the proposed approach computes a that optimally explains'' the data. This addresses the criticisms of @cite_8 , who claim that IRL is insufficient in morally and socially important domains because (1) reward functions can be difficult for human instructors to understand and correct, and (2) some moral and social goals may be too temporally complex to be representable using reward functions.
@cite_8 @cite_20 @cite_11
2794632992 1999874108 2061562262
In this paper, we apply tools from inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to the problem of learning from (unlabeled) demonstration trajectories of behavior generated by varying "intentions" or objectives. We derive an EM approach that clusters observed trajectories by inferring the objectives for each cluster using any of several possible IRL methods, and then uses the constructed clusters to quickly identify the intent of a trajectory. We show that a natural approach to IRL—a gradient ascent method that modifies reward parameters to maximize the likelihood of the observed trajectories—is successful at quickly identifying unknown reward functions. We demonstrate these ideas in the context of apprenticeship learning by acquiring the preferences of a human driver in a simple highway car simulator. Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is an approach for domain-reward discovery from demonstration, where an agent mines the reward function of a Markov decision process by observing an expert acting in the domain. In the standard setting, it is assumed that the expert acts (nearly) optimally, and a large number of trajectories, i.e., training examples are available for reward discovery (and consequently, learning domain behavior). These are not practical assumptions: trajectories are often noisy, and there can be a paucity of examples. Our novel approach incorporates advice-giving into the IRL framework to address these issues. Inspired by preference elicitation, a domain expert provides advice on states and actions (features) by stating preferences over them. We evaluate our approach on several domains and show that with small amounts of targeted preference advice, learning is possible from noisy demonstrations, and requires far fewer trajectories compared to simply learning from trajectories alone. This paper reports theoretical and empirical results obtained for the score-based Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) algorithm. It relies on a non-standard setting for IRL consisting of learning a reward from a set of globally scored trajectories. This allows using any type of policy (optimal or not) to generate trajectories without prior knowledge during data collection. This way, any existing database (like logs of systems in use) can be scored a posteriori by an expert and used to learn a reward function. Thanks to this reward function, it is shown that a near-optimal policy can be computed. Being related to least-square regression, the algorithm (called SBIRL) comes with theoretical guarantees that are proven in this paper. SBIRL is compared to standard IRL algorithms on synthetic data showing that annotations do help under conditions on the quality of the trajectories. It is also shown to be suitable for real-world applications such as the optimisation of a spoken dialogue system. This paper provides a comparative study between Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Apprenticeship Learning (AL). IRL and AL are two frameworks, using Markov Decision Processes (MDP), which are used for the imitation learning problem where an agent tries to learn from demonstrations of an expert. In the AL framework, the agent tries to learn the expert policy whereas in the IRL framework, the agent tries to learn a reward which can explain the behavior of the expert. This reward is then optimized to imitate the expert. One can wonder if it is worth estimating such a reward, or if estimating a policy is sufficient. This quite natural question has not really been addressed in the literature right now. We provide partial answers, both from a theoretical and empirical point of view.