Dropout is a crucial regularization technique for the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) models of Natural Language Inference (NLI). However, dropout has not been evaluated for the effectiveness at different layers and dropout rates in NLI models. In this paper, we propose a novel RNN model for NLI and empirically evaluate the effect of applying dropout at different layers in the model. We also investigate the impact of varying dropout rates at these layers. Our empirical evaluation on a large (Stanford Natural Language Inference (SNLI)) and a small (SciTail) dataset suggest that dropout at each feed-forward connection severely affects the model accuracy at increasing dropout rates. We also show that regularizing the embedding layer is efficient for SNLI whereas regularizing the recurrent layer improves the accuracy for SciTail. Our model achieved an accuracy (86.14 ) on the SNLI dataset and (77.05 ) on SciTail.
Different NLI models apply dropout at different layers in general NLI architecture. NLI models proposed by @cite_8 and @cite_3 apply dropout to each feed-forward layer in the network whereas others have applied dropout only to the final classifier layer @cite_15 . @cite_13 apply dropout only to the input and output of sentence encoding layers.The models proposed by @cite_9 and @cite_6 applied dropout to the output of embedding layer and to the input and output of classifier layer. @cite_5 and @cite_11 use dropout but they do not elaborate on the location.
@cite_8 @cite_9 @cite_3 @cite_6 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_13 @cite_11
2785375517 2308720496 2782363479 2963580443 2768523431 2415204069 1840435438 2267186426
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. We introduce DropConnect, a generalization of Dropout (, 2012), for regularizing large fully-connected layers within neural networks. When training with Dropout, a randomly selected subset of activations are set to zero within each layer. DropConnect instead sets a randomly selected subset of weights within the network to zero. Each unit thus receives input from a random subset of units in the previous layer. We derive a bound on the generalization performance of both Dropout and DropConnect. We then evaluate DropConnect on a range of datasets, comparing to Dropout, and show state-of-the-art results on several image recognition benchmarks by aggregating multiple DropConnect-trained models. The dropout technique is a data-driven regularization method for neural networks. It consists in randomly setting some activations from a given hidden layer to zero during training. Repeating the procedure for each training example, it is equivalent to sample a network from an exponential number of architectures that share weights. The goal of dropout is to prevent feature detectors to rely on each other. Dropout has successfully been applied to Deep MLPs and to convolutional neural networks, for various tasks of Speech Recognition and Computer Vision. We recently proposed a way to use dropout in MDLSTM-RNNs for handwritten word and line recognition. In this paper, we show that further improvement can be achieved by implementing dropout differently, more specifically by applying it at better positions relative to the LSTM units. Recently, dropout has seen increasing use in deep learning. For deep convolutional neural networks, dropout is known to work well in fully-connected layers. However, its effect in convolutional and pooling layers is still not clear. This paper demonstrates that max-pooling dropout is equivalent to randomly picking activation based on a multinomial distribution at training time. In light of this insight, we advocate employing our proposed probabilistic weighted pooling, instead of commonly used max-pooling, to act as model averaging at test time. Empirical evidence validates the superiority of probabilistic weighted pooling. We also empirically show that the effect of convolutional dropout is not trivial, despite the dramatically reduced possibility of over-fitting due to the convolutional architecture. Elaborately designing dropout training simultaneously in max-pooling and fully-connected layers, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on MNIST, and very competitive results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, relative to other approaches without data augmentation. Finally, we compare max-pooling dropout and stochastic pooling, both of which introduce stochasticity based on multinomial distributions at pooling stage.