We investigate the use of alternative divergences to Kullback-Leibler (KL) in variational inference(VI), based on the Variational Dropout kingma2015 . Stochastic gradient variational Bayes (SGVB) aevb is a general framework for estimating the evidence lower bound (ELBO) in Variational Bayes. In this work, we extend the SGVB estimator with using Alpha-Divergences, which are alternative to divergences to VI' KL objective. The Gaussian dropout can be seen as a local reparametrization trick of the SGVB objective. We extend the Variational Dropout to use alpha divergences for variational inference. Our results compare @math -divergence variational dropout with standard variational dropout with correlated and uncorrelated weight noise. We show that the @math -divergence with @math (or KL divergence) is still a good measure for use in variational inference, in spite of the efficient use of Alpha-divergences for Dropout VI Li17 . @math can yield the lowest training error, and optimizes a good lower bound for the evidence lower bound (ELBO) among all values of the parameter @math .
Our work extends the variational dropout technique originally proposed in @cite_0 . It was suggested that applying a multiplicative random noise to inputs of a fully-connected neural network layer is equivalent to computing the posterior distribution of the pre-activation outputs ( @cite_0 ). Using the reparametrization of the weights @math as @math , where @math is a deterministic weight value and @math is a random variable determining the scale of the @math weight. As described in @cite_0 , it is possible to split the posterior distribution over the weights @math into an additive (i.e., location) parameter @math and a multiplicative (i.e., scale) parameter @math . Formally, @math , using set notation.
@cite_0
1826234144
In this paper, we use dynamical system to analyze the nonlinear weight dynamics of two-layered bias-free networks in the form of @math , where @math is ReLU nonlinearity. We assume that the input @math follow Gaussian distribution. The network is trained using gradient descent to mimic the output of a teacher network of the same size with fixed parameters @math using @math loss. We first show that when @math , the nonlinear dynamics can be written in close form, and converges to @math with at least @math probability, if random weight initializations of proper standard derivation ( @math ) is used, verifying empirical practice. For networks with many ReLU nodes ( @math ), we apply our close form dynamics and prove that when the teacher parameters @math forms orthonormal bases, (1) a symmetric weight initialization yields a convergence to a saddle point and (2) a certain symmetry-breaking weight initialization yields global convergence to @math without local minima. To our knowledge, this is the first proof that shows global convergence in nonlinear neural network without unrealistic assumptions on the independence of ReLU activations. In addition, we also give a concise gradient update formulation for a multilayer ReLU network when it follows a teacher of the same size with @math loss. Simulations verify our theoretical analysis. Multi-layer neural networks have lead to remarkable performance on many kinds of benchmark tasks in text, speech and image processing. Nonlinear parameter estimation in hierarchical models is known to be subject to overfitting and misspecification. One approach to these estimation and related problems (local minima, colinearity, feature discovery etc.) is called Dropout (Hinton, et al 2012, 2016). The Dropout algorithm removes hidden units according to a Bernoulli random variable with probability @math prior to each update, creating random "shocks" to the network that are averaged over updates. In this paper we will show that Dropout is a special case of a more general model published originally in 1990 called the Stochastic Delta Rule, or SDR (Hanson, 1990). SDR redefines each weight in the network as a random variable with mean @math and standard deviation @math . Each weight random variable is sampled on each forward activation, consequently creating an exponential number of potential networks with shared weights. Both parameters are updated according to prediction error, thus resulting in weight noise injections that reflect a local history of prediction error and local model averaging. SDR therefore implements a more sensitive local gradient-dependent simulated annealing per weight converging in the limit to a Bayes optimal network. Tests on standard benchmarks (CIFAR) using a modified version of DenseNet shows the SDR outperforms standard Dropout in test error by approx. @math with DenseNet-BC 250 on CIFAR-100 and approx. @math in smaller networks. We also show that SDR reaches the same accuracy that Dropout attains in 100 epochs in as few as 35 epochs. Dropout is a simple but effective technique for learning in neural networks and other settings. A sound theoretical understanding of dropout is needed to determine when dropout should be applied and how to use it most effectively. In this paper we continue the exploration of dropout as a regularizer pioneered by Wager, et.al. We focus on linear classification where a convex proxy to the misclassification loss (i.e. the logistic loss used in logistic regression) is minimized. We show: (a) when the dropout-regularized criterion has a unique minimizer, (b) when the dropout-regularization penalty goes to infinity with the weights, and when it remains bounded, (c) that the dropout regularization can be non-monotonic as individual weights increase from 0, and (d) that the dropout regularization penalty may not be convex. This last point is particularly surprising because the combination of dropout regularization with any convex loss proxy is always a convex function. In order to contrast dropout regularization with @math regularization, we formalize the notion of when different sources are more compatible with different regularizers. We then exhibit distributions that are provably more compatible with dropout regularization than @math regularization, and vice versa. These sources provide additional insight into how the inductive biases of dropout and @math regularization differ. We provide some similar results for @math regularization. We study Byzantine fault-tolerant distributed optimization of a sum of convex (cost) functions with real-valued scalar input ouput. In particular, the goal is to optimize a global cost function @math , where @math is the set of non-faulty agents, and @math is agent @math 's local cost function, which is initially known only to agent @math . In general, when some of the agents may be Byzantine faulty, the above goal is unachievable, because the identity of the faulty agents is not necessarily known to the non-faulty agents, and the faulty agents may behave arbitrarily. Since the above global cost function cannot be optimized exactly in presence of Byzantine agents, we define a weaker version of the problem. The goal for the weaker problem is to generate an output that is an optimum of a function formed as a convex combination of local cost functions of the non-faulty agents. More precisely, for some choice of weights @math for @math such that @math and @math , the output must be an optimum of the cost function @math . Ideally, we would like @math for all @math -- however, this cannot be guaranteed due to the presence of faulty agents. In fact, we show that the maximum achievable number of nonzero weights ( @math 's) is @math , where @math is the upper bound on the number of Byzantine agents. In addition, we present algorithms that ensure that at least @math agents have weights that are bounded away from 0. We also propose a low-complexity suboptimal algorithm, which ensures that at least @math agents have weights that are bounded away from 0, where @math is the total number of agents, and @math ( @math ) is the actual number of Byzantine agents.