This paper presents a new method and a constraint-based objective function to solve two problemsrelated to the design of optical telecommunication networks, namely the Synchronous Optical Net-work Ring Assignment Problem (SRAP) and the Intra-ring Synchronous Optical Network DesignProblem (IDP). These network topology problems can be represented as a graph partitioning withcapacity constraints as shown in previous works. We present here a new objective function and anew local search algorithm to solve these problems. Experiments conducted in C
Previously, we saw that with local search it is necessary to define a neighborhood to choose the next solution. The authors of @cite_5 use the same for all of their metaheuristics. It tries to assign an item @math from a partition, @math , to another partition, @math . The authors also consider the neighborhood obtained by swapping two items, @math and @math , from two different partitions, @math and @math . But instead of trying all the pairs of items, it will only try to swap the two items if the resulting solution of the assignment of @math to the partition @math is unfeasible.
@cite_5
1969385974
In this paper we study the problem of allocating divisible items to agents without payments. We assume no prior knowledge about the agents. The utility of an agent is additive. The social welfare of a mechanism is defined as the overall utility of all agents. This model is first defined by Guo and Conitzer [7]. Here we are interested in strategy-proof mechanisms that have a good competitive ratio, that is, those that are able to achieve social welfare close to the maximal social welfare in all cases. First, for the setting of n agents and m items, we prove that there is no (1 m+e)-competitive strategy-proof mechanism, for any e>0. And, no mechanism can achieve a competitive ratio better than @math , when @math . Next we study the setting of two agents and m items, which is also the focus of [7]. We prove that the competitive ratio of any swap-dictatorial mechanism is no greater than @math . Then we give a characterization result: for the case of 2 items, if the mechanism is strategy-proof, symmetric and second order continuously differentiable, then it is always swap-dictatorial. In the end we consider a setting where an agent's valuation of each item is bounded by C m, where C is an arbitrary constant. We show a mechanism that is (1 2+e(C))-competitive, where e(C)>0. In the three-dimensional (3D) strip packing problem, we are given a set of 3D rectangular items and a 3D box @math . The goal is to pack all the items in @math such that the height of the packing is minimized. We consider the most basic version of the problem, where the items must be packed with their edges parallel to the edges of @math and cannot be rotated. Building upon Caprara's work for the two-dimensional (2D) bin packing problem, we obtain an algorithm that, given any @math , achieves an approximation of @math , where @math is the well-known number that occurs naturally in the context of bin packing. Our key idea is to establish a connection between bin packing solutions for an arbitrary instance @math and the strip packing solutions for the corresponding instance obtained from @math by applying the harmonic transformation to certain dimensions. Based on this connection, we also give a simple alternate proof of the @math approximation for 2D ... We consider a large class of random geometric graphs constructed from samples @math of independent, identically distributed observations of an underlying probability measure @math on a bounded domain @math . The popular modularity' clustering method specifies a partition @math of the set @math as the solution of an optimization problem. In this paper, under conditions on @math and @math , we derive scaling limits of the modularity clustering on random geometric graphs. Among other results, we show a geometric form of consistency: When the number of clusters is a priori bounded above, the discrete optimal partitions @math converge in a certain sense to a continuum partition @math of the underlying domain @math , characterized as the solution of a type of Kelvin's shape optimization problem. The multiple knapsack problem (MKP) is a natural and well-known generalization of the single knapsack problem and is defined as follows. We are given a set of @math items and @math bins (knapsacks) such that each item @math has a profit @math and a size @math , and each bin @math has a capacity @math . The goal is to find a subset of items of maximum profit such that they have a feasible packing in the bins. MKP is a special case of the generalized assignment problem (GAP) where the profit and the size of an item can vary based on the specific bin that it is assigned to. GAP is APX-hard and a 2-approximation, for it is implicit in the work of Shmoys and Tardos [Math. Program. A, 62 (1993), pp. 461-474], and thus far, this was also the best known approximation for MKP @. The main result of this paper is a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for MKP @. Apart from its inherent theoretical interest as a common generalization of the well-studied knapsack and bin packing problems, it appears to be the strongest special case of GAP that is not APX-hard. We substantiate this by showing that slight generalizations of MKP are APX-hard. Thus our results help demarcate the boundary at which instances of GAP become APX-hard. An interesting aspect of our approach is a PTAS-preserving reduction from an arbitrary instance of MKP to an instance with @math distinct sizes and profits.