We study a multiplayer stochastic multi-armed bandit problem in which players cannot communicate, and if two or more players pull the same arm, a collision occurs and the involved players receive zero reward. We consider the challenging heterogeneous setting, in which different arms may have different means for different players, and propose a new, efficient algorithm that combines the idea of leveraging forced collisions for implicit communication and that of performing matching eliminations. We give a finite-time analysis of our algorithm, bounding its regret by O((log T)^ 1+ ) for any fixed >0. If the optimal assignment of players to arms is unique, we further show that it attains the optimal O(log(T)) regret, solving an open question raised at NeurIPS 2018.
The Game-of-Thrones algorithm is proved to have an expected regret of order @math for any given constant @math , where the constant in the @math depends on @math and on the problem parameters ( @math , @math and @math ) in a way that is not very explicit in Theorem 3 of @cite_16 . Unlike our algorithms, GOT does not need to know the horizon @math . However, (a lower bound on) the value of @math is needed to calibrate the length of the exploration phase. Moreover, the analysis of the Game-of-Thrones algorithm works for small enough @math ,' where @math is a parameter of the GOT phase, but it is not clear how the players must choose @math to achieve the guaranteed regret.
@cite_16
2912712349
We study the problem of approximating the commuting-operator value of a two-player non-local game. It is well-known that it is @math -complete to decide whether the classical value of a non-local game is 1 or @math . Furthermore, as long as @math is small enough, this result does not depend on the gap @math . In contrast, a recent result of Fitzsimons, Ji, Vidick, and Yuen shows that the complexity of computing the quantum value grows without bound as the gap @math decreases. In this paper, we show that this also holds for the commuting-operator value of a game. Specifically, in the language of multi-prover interactive proofs, we show that the power of @math (proofs with two provers, one round, completeness probability @math , soundness probability @math , and commuting-operator strategies) can increase without bound as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. Our results also extend naturally in two ways, to perfect zero-knowledge protocols, and to lower bounds on the complexity of computing the approximately-commuting value of a game. Thus we get lower bounds on the complexity class @math - @math of perfect zero-knowledge multi-prover proofs with approximately-commuting operator strategies, as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. While we do not know any computable time upper bound on the class @math , a result of the first author and Vidick shows that for @math and @math , the class @math , with constant communication from the provers, is contained in @math . We give a lower bound of @math (ignoring constants inside the function) for this class, which is tight up to polynomial factors assuming the exponential time hypothesis. We consider the problem of learning in single-player and multiplayer multiarmed bandit models. Bandit problems are classes of online learning problems that capture exploration versus exploitation tradeoffs. In a multiarmed bandit model, players can pick among many arms, and each play of an arm generates an i.i.d. reward from an unknown distribution. The objective is to design a policy that maximizes the expected reward over a time horizon for a single-player setting and the sum of expected rewards for the multiplayer setting. In the multiplayer setting, arms may give different rewards to different players. There is no separate channel for coordination among the players. Any attempt at communication is costly and adds to regret. We propose two decentralizable policies, @math ( @math - @math ) and @math - @math , that can be used in both single-player and multiplayer settings. These policies are shown to yield expected regret that grows, at most, as @math (and @math under some assumption). It is well known that @math is the lower bound on the rate of growth of regret even in a centralized case. The proposed algorithms improve on prior work where regret grew at @math . More fundamentally, these policies address the question of additional cost incurred in decentralized online learning, suggesting that there is, at most, an @math -factor cost in terms of the order of regret. This solves a problem of relevance in many domains and had been open for a while. The multi-armed bandit problem is a popular model for studying exploration exploitation trade-off in sequential decision problems. Many algorithms are now available for this well-studied problem. One of the earliest algorithms, given by W. R. Thompson, dates back to 1933. This algorithm, referred to as Thompson Sampling, is a natural Bayesian algorithm. The basic idea is to choose an arm to play according to its probability of being the best arm. Thompson Sampling algorithm has experimentally been shown to be close to optimal. In addition, it is efficient to implement and exhibits several desirable properties such as small regret for delayed feedback. However, theoretical understanding of this algorithm was quite limited. In this paper, for the first time, we show that Thompson Sampling algorithm achieves logarithmic expected regret for the multi-armed bandit problem. More precisely, for the two-armed bandit problem, the expected regret in time @math is @math . And, for the @math -armed bandit problem, the expected regret in time @math is @math . Our bounds are optimal but for the dependence on @math and the constant factors in big-Oh. We consider the problem of learning in single-player and multiplayer multiarmed bandit models. Bandit problems are classes of online learning problems that capture exploration versus exploitation tradeoffs. In a multiarmed bandit model, players can pick among many arms, and each play of an arm generates an i.i.d. reward from an unknown distribution. The objective is to design a policy that maximizes the expected reward over a time horizon for a single player setting and the sum of expected rewards for the multiplayer setting. In the multiplayer setting, arms may give different rewards to different players. There is no separate channel for coordination among the players. Any attempt at communication is costly and adds to regret. We propose two decentralizable policies, @math ( @math - @math ) and @math - @math , that can be used in both single player and multiplayer settings. These policies are shown to yield expected regret that grows at most as O( @math ). It is well known that @math is the lower bound on the rate of growth of regret even in a centralized case. The proposed algorithms improve on prior work where regret grew at O( @math ). More fundamentally, these policies address the question of additional cost incurred in decentralized online learning, suggesting that there is at most an @math -factor cost in terms of order of regret. This solves a problem of relevance in many domains and had been open for a while.