IBM models are very important word alignment models in Machine Translation. Following the Maximum Likelihood Estimation principle to estimate their parameters, the models will easily overfit the training data when the data are sparse. While smoothing is a very popular solution in Language Model, there still lacks studies on smoothing for word alignment. In this paper, we propose a framework which generalizes the notable work Moore [2004] of applying additive smoothing to word alignment models. The framework allows developers to customize the smoothing amount for each pair of word. The added amount will be scaled appropriately by a common factor which reflects how much the framework trusts the adding strategy according to the performance on data. We also carefully examine various performance criteria and propose a smoothened version of the error count, which generally gives the best result.
However, there is still lack of studies for applying smoothing techniques to the word alignment problem. The work of this paper is mostly an extended work of @cite_7 which is the earliest study for this matter. In that work, Moore has an intensive study of many improvements to IBM Model 1. Additive smoothing is the first of the three improvements, which directly attempts to solve the sparsity problem. In spite of the simplicity, the method has good performance. The smoothing technique Moore applied is additive smoothing. For every pair of word @math , it is assumed that @math and @math were paired in a constant number of times before the training data is observed. Therefore, in each estimation, this assumption will be taken into account and the prior number of times, which they are paired, will be added appropriately. The constant prior count is tuned manually or learnt from some additional annotated data.
@cite_7
2172138510
We show a worst-case lower bound and a smoothed upper bound on the number of iterations performed by the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm. First proposed by Besl and McKay, the algorithm is widely used in computational geometry, where it is known for its simplicity and its observed speed. The theoretical study of ICP was initiated by Ezra, Sharir, and Efrat, who showed that the worst-case running time to align two sets of @math points in @math is between @math and @math . We substantially tighten this gap by improving the lower bound to @math . To help reconcile this bound with the algorithm's observed speed, we also show that the smoothed complexity of ICP is polynomial, independent of the dimensionality of the data. Using similar methods, we improve the best known smoothed upper bound for the popular k-means method to @math , once again independent of the dimension. In this paper, we initiate a systematic investigation of differentially private algorithms for convex empirical risk minimization. Various instantiations of this problem have been studied before. We provide new algorithms and matching lower bounds for private ERM assuming only that each data point's contribution to the loss function is Lipschitz bounded and that the domain of optimization is bounded. We provide a separate set of algorithms and matching lower bounds for the setting in which the loss functions are known to also be strongly convex. Our algorithms run in polynomial time, and in some cases even match the optimal non-private running time (as measured by oracle complexity). We give separate algorithms (and lower bounds) for @math - and @math -differential privacy; perhaps surprisingly, the techniques used for designing optimal algorithms in the two cases are completely different. Our lower bounds apply even to very simple, smooth function families, such as linear and quadratic functions. This implies that algorithms from previous work can be used to obtain optimal error rates, under the additional assumption that the contributions of each data point to the loss function is smooth. We show that simple approaches to smoothing arbitrary loss functions (in order to apply previous techniques) do not yield optimal error rates. In particular, optimal algorithms were not previously known for problems such as training support vector machines and the high-dimensional median. Re-Pair is an efficient grammar compressor that operates by recursively replacing high-frequency character pairs with new grammar symbols. The most space-efficient linear-time algorithm computing Re-Pair uses @math words on top of the re-writable text (of length @math and stored in @math words), for any constant @math ; in practice however, this solution uses complex sub-procedures preventing it from being practical. In this paper, we present an implementation of the above-mentioned result making use of more practical solutions; our tool further improves the working space to @math words (text included), for some small constant @math . As a second contribution, we focus on compact representations of the output grammar. The lower bound for storing a grammar with @math rules is @math bits, and the most efficient encoding algorithm in the literature uses at most @math bits and runs in @math time. We describe a linear-time heuristic maximizing the compressibility of the output Re-Pair grammar. On real datasets, our grammar encoding uses---on average---only @math more bits than the information-theoretic minimum. In half of the tested cases, our compressor improves the output size of 7-Zip with maximum compression rate turned on. We study identifiability for bilinear inverse problems under sparsity and subspace constraints. We show that, up to a global scaling ambiguity, almost all such maps are injective on the set of pairs of sparse vectors if the number of measurements @math exceeds @math , where @math and @math denote the sparsity of the two input vectors, and injective on the set of pairs of vectors lying in known subspaces of dimensions @math and @math if @math . We also prove that both these bounds are tight in the sense that one cannot have injectivity for a smaller number of measurements. Our proof technique draws from algebraic geometry. As an application we derive optimal identifiability conditions for the deconvolution problem, thus improving on recent work of [1].