This article examines dynamic energy consumption caused by data during software execution on deeply embedded microprocessors, which can be significant on some devices. In worst-case energy consumption analysis, energy models are used to find the most costly execution path. Taking each instruction’s worst-case energy produces a safe but overly pessimistic upper bound. Algorithms for safe and tight bounds would be desirable. We show that finding exact worst-case energy is NP-hard, and that tight bounds cannot be approximated with guaranteed safety. We conclude that any energy model targeting tightness must either sacrifice safety or accept overapproximation proportional to data-dependent energy.
One of the most popular techniques is the instruction level energy model @cite_30 . Various test patterns of instructions are executed on a processor and their power empirically measured, leading to a model of per instruction energy costs and the dynamic cost of switching between different instructions. Simulating an instruction sequence, or interpreting a trace of an execution, can then be combined with this energy model to produce a cost value for the execution. @cite_21 extend this model to include the costs of circuit switching in instruction operands. These costs include the amount of switching occurring on data buses supplying input operands to an instruction, and the switching on the output when a result is written back to the register file.
@cite_30 @cite_21
2129663297 139065849
This article examines a hardware multithreaded microprocessor and discusses the impact such an architecture has on existing software energy modeling techniques. A framework is constructed for analyzing the energy behavior of the XMOS XS1-L multithreaded processor and a variation on existing software energy models is proposed, based on analysis of collected energy data. It is shown that by combining execution statistics with sufficient data on the processor’s thread activity and instruction execution costs, a multithreaded software energy model used with Instruction Set Simulation can yield an average error margin of less than 7p. Future generation processors are expected to have high soft error rates and will require increased fault detection and fault tolerance. This work focuses on errors in execution units. Hardware or software duplication or triplication, parity, or residue codes could be used to detect errors in execution units. However, hardware duplication triplication have significant area overhead and, in applications with high utilization of floating point units (FPU), very high energy cost. Software duplication triplication of instructions also increases both execution time and energy consumption. This paper proposes to reduce the cost of redundant instruction execution in FPUs through vectorization. Duplicated or triplicated instructions and result comparisons can be packed by a compiler into vector instructions, such as SSE or AVX. Experimental results using hand vectorization on a variety of benchmarks show that, compared to error detection through scalar instruction duplication, vector mode redundant execution achieves 1.78× and 2.73× average speedup for SSE and AVX instructions, respectively. It also significantly reduces the energy consumption, by an average of 40 and 53 , respectively, for SSE and AVX. Thus the proposed technique enables error detection with no hardware cost and reduced time and energy overhead compared to brute-force scalar instruction duplication. Reducing energy consumption has become an important issue in designing hardware and software systems in recent years. Although low power hardware components are critical for reducing energy consumption, the switching activity, which is the main source of dynamic power dissipation in electronic systems, is largely determined by the software running on these systems. In this paper, we present and evaluate several instruction scheduling algorithms that reorder a given sequence of instructions taking into account the energy considerations. We first compare a performance-oriented scheduling technique with three energy-oriented instruction scheduling algorithms from both performance (execution cycles of the resulting schedules) and energy consumption points of view. Then, we propose three scheduling algorithms that consider energy and performance at the same time. Our experimentation with these scheduling techniques shows that the best scheduling from the performance perspective is not necessarily the best scheduling from the energy perspective. Further, scheduling techniques that consider both energy and performance simultaneously are found to be desirable, that is, these techniques are quite successful in reducing energy consumption and their performance (in terms of execution cycles) is comparable to that of a pure performance-oriented scheduling. We also illuminate the inherent approximations and difficulties in building energy models for enabling energy-aware instruction scheduling and explore alternative options using cycle-accurate energy simulator. The simulation results show that the energy-oriented scheduling reduces energy consumption by up to 30 compared to the performance-oriented scheduling. Energy models can be constructed by characterizing the energy consumed by executing each instruction in a processor's instruction set. This can be used to determine how much energy is required to execute a sequence of assembly instructions, without the need to instrument or measure hardware. However, statically analyzing low-level program structures is hard, and the gap between the high-level program structure and the low-level energy models needs to be bridged. We have developed techniques for performing a static analysis on the intermediate compiler representations of a program. Specifically, we target LLVM IR, a representation used by modern compilers, including Clang. Using these techniques we can automatically infer an estimate of the energy consumed when running a function under different platforms, using different compilers. One of the challenges in doing so is that of determining an energy cost of executing LLVM IR program segments, for which we have developed two different approaches. When this information is used in conjunction with our analysis, we are able to infer energy formulae that characterize the energy consumption for a particular program. This approach can be applied to any languages targeting the LLVM toolchain, including C and XC or architectures such as ARM Cortex-M or XMOS xCORE, with a focus towards embedded platforms. Our techniques are validated on these platforms by comparing the static analysis results to the physical measurements taken from the hardware. Static energy consumption estimation enables energy-aware software development, without requiring hardware knowledge.