Data mining algorithms are originally designed by assuming the data is available at one centralized site. These algorithms also assume that the whole data is fit into main memory while running the algorithm. But in today's scenario the data has to be handled is distributed even geographically. Bringing the data into a centralized site is a bottleneck in terms of the bandwidth when compared with the size of the data. In this paper for multiclass SVM we propose an algorithm which builds a global SVM model by merging the local SVMs using a distributed approach(DSVM). And the global SVM will be communicated to each site and made it available for further classification. The experimental analysis has shown promising results with better accuracy when compared with both the centralized and ensemble method. The time complexity is also reduced drastically because of the parallel construction of local SVMs. The experiments are conducted by considering the data sets of size 100s to hundred of 100s which also addresses the issue of scalability.
In 1998 Han. discussed the model of coupling the estimation of class probabilities for each pair of classes @cite_5 . The used classifiers include linear discriminant, nearest neighbors and SVM.
@cite_5
2019575783
We discuss a strategy for polychotomous classification that involves estimating class probabilities for each pair of classes, and then coupling the estimates together. The coupling model is similar to the Bradley-Terry method for paired comparisons. We study the nature of the class probability estimates that arise, and examine the performance of the procedure in real and simulated data sets. Classifiers used include linear discriminants, nearest neighbors, adaptive nonlinear methods and the support vector machine. Pairwise coupling is a popular multi-class classification method that combines all comparisons for each pair of classes. This paper presents two approaches for obtaining class probabilities. Both methods can be reduced to linear systems and are easy to implement. We show conceptually and experimentally that the proposed approaches are more stable than the two existing popular methods: voting and the method by Hastie and Tibshirani (1998) Preface * Introduction * The Bayes Error * Inequalities and alternatedistance measures * Linear discrimination * Nearest neighbor rules *Consistency * Slow rates of convergence Error estimation * The regularhistogram rule * Kernel rules Consistency of the k-nearest neighborrule * Vapnik-Chervonenkis theory * Combinatorial aspects of Vapnik-Chervonenkis theory * Lower bounds for empirical classifier selection* The maximum likelihood principle * Parametric classification *Generalized linear discrimination * Complexity regularization *Condensed and edited nearest neighbor rules * Tree classifiers * Data-dependent partitioning * Splitting the data * The resubstitutionestimate * Deleted estimates of the error probability * Automatickernel rules * Automatic nearest neighbor rules * Hypercubes anddiscrete spaces * Epsilon entropy and totally bounded sets * Uniformlaws of large numbers * Neural networks * Other error estimates *Feature extraction * Appendix * Notation * References * Index We are interested in large-scale image classification and especially in the setting where images corresponding to new or existing classes are continuously added to the training set. Our goal is to devise classifiers which can incorporate such images and classes on-the-fly at (near) zero cost. We cast this problem into one of learning a metric which is shared across all classes and explore k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) and nearest class mean (NCM) classifiers. We learn metrics on the ImageNet 2010 challenge data set, which contains more than 1.2M training images of 1K classes. Surprisingly, the NCM classifier compares favorably to the more flexible k-NN classifier, and has comparable performance to linear SVMs. We also study the generalization performance, among others by using the learned metric on the ImageNet-10K dataset, and we obtain competitive performance. Finally, we explore zero-shot classification, and show how the zero-shot model can be combined very effectively with small training datasets.