This article examines dynamic energy consumption caused by data during software execution on deeply embedded microprocessors, which can be significant on some devices. In worst-case energy consumption analysis, energy models are used to find the most costly execution path. Taking each instruction’s worst-case energy produces a safe but overly pessimistic upper bound. Algorithms for safe and tight bounds would be desirable. We show that finding exact worst-case energy is NP-hard, and that tight bounds cannot be approximated with guaranteed safety. We conclude that any energy model targeting tightness must either sacrifice safety or accept overapproximation proportional to data-dependent energy.
Switching between instructions is a notable contributor to energy consumption, which can be controlled through the order in which instructions are executed. Techniques have been developed to reduce consumption through instruction scheduling @cite_36 , but this is known to be an NP-hard problem. Instruction scheduling uses pre-computed costs of switching between instructions to determine an optimal static schedule. It does not consider the operands to instructions or any cost that does not have a fixed value.
@cite_36
2124609089
Reducing energy consumption has become an important issue in designing hardware and software systems in recent years. Although low power hardware components are critical for reducing energy consumption, the switching activity, which is the main source of dynamic power dissipation in electronic systems, is largely determined by the software running on these systems. In this paper we present and evaluate several instruction scheduling algorithms that reorder a given sequence of instructions taking into account the energy considerations. We first compare a performance-oriented scheduling technique with three energy-oriented instruction scheduling algorithms from both performance (execution cycles of the resulting schedules) and energy consumption points of view. Then, we propose three scheduling algorithms that consider energy and performance at the same time. The results obtained show that these techniques are quite successful in reducing energy consumption and their performance is comparable to that of a pure performance-oriented scheduling. Reducing energy consumption has become an important issue in designing hardware and software systems in recent years. Although low power hardware components are critical for reducing energy consumption, the switching activity, which is the main source of dynamic power dissipation in electronic systems, is largely determined by the software running on these systems. In this paper, we present and evaluate several instruction scheduling algorithms that reorder a given sequence of instructions taking into account the energy considerations. We first compare a performance-oriented scheduling technique with three energy-oriented instruction scheduling algorithms from both performance (execution cycles of the resulting schedules) and energy consumption points of view. Then, we propose three scheduling algorithms that consider energy and performance at the same time. Our experimentation with these scheduling techniques shows that the best scheduling from the performance perspective is not necessarily the best scheduling from the energy perspective. Further, scheduling techniques that consider both energy and performance simultaneously are found to be desirable, that is, these techniques are quite successful in reducing energy consumption and their performance (in terms of execution cycles) is comparable to that of a pure performance-oriented scheduling. We also illuminate the inherent approximations and difficulties in building energy models for enabling energy-aware instruction scheduling and explore alternative options using cycle-accurate energy simulator. The simulation results show that the energy-oriented scheduling reduces energy consumption by up to 30 compared to the performance-oriented scheduling. The execution of workloads such as web servers and database servers typically switches back and forth between different tasks such as user applications, system call handlers, and interrupt handlers. The combined size of the instruction footprints of such tasks typically exceeds that of the i-cache (16-32 KB). This causes a lot of i-cache misses and thereby reduces the application’s performance. Hence, we propose SchedTask, a hardware-assisted task scheduler that improves the performance of such workloads by executing tasks with similar instruction footprints on the same core. We start by decomposing the combined execution of the OS and the applications into sequences of instructions calledSuperFunctions. We propose a scheme to determine the amount of overlap between the instruction footprints of different SuperFunctions by using Bloom filters. We then use a hierarchical scheduler to execute SuperFunctions with similar instruction footprints on the same core. For a suite of 8 popular OS-intensive workloads, we report an increase in the application’s performance of up to 29 percentage points (mean: 11.4 percentage points) over state of the art scheduling techniques. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering @math Scheduling; Virtual memory; • Computer systems organization @math Multicore architectures; Cloud computing; The fact that energy is a scarce resource in many embedded real-time systems creates the need for energy-aware task schedulers, which not only guarantee timing constraints but also consider energy consumption. Unfortunately, existing approaches to analyze the worst-case execution time (WCET) of a task usually cannot be directly applied to determine its worst-case energy consumption (WCEC) due to execution time and energy consumption not being closely correlated on many state-of-the-art processors. Instead, a WCEC analyzer must take into account the particular energy characteristics of a target platform. In this paper, we present 0g, a comprehensive approach to WCEC analysis that combines different techniques to speed up the analysis and to improve results. If detailed knowledge about the energy costs of instructions on the target platform is available, our tool is able to compute upper bounds for the WCEC by statically analyzing the program code. Otherwise, a novel approach allows 0g to determine the WCEC by measurement after having identified a set of suitable program inputs based on an auxiliary energy model, which specifies the energy consumption of instructions in relation to each other. Our experiments for three target platforms show that 0g provides precise WCEC estimates.