Humans take advantage of real world symmetries for various tasks, yet capturing their superb symmetry perception mechanism into a computational model remains elusive. Encouraged by a new discovery (CVPR 2016) demonstrating extremely high inter-person accuracy of human perceived symmetries in the wild, we have created the first deep-learning neural network for reflection and rotation symmetry detection (Sym-NET), trained on photos from MS-COCO (Common Object in COntext) dataset with nearly 11K symmetry-labels from more than 400 human observers. We employ novel methods to convert discrete human labels into symmetry heatmaps, capture symmetry densely in an image and quantitatively evaluate Sym-NET against multiple existing computer vision algorithms. Using the symmetry competition testsets from CVPR 2013 and unseen MS-COCO photos, Sym-NET comes out as the winner with significantly superior performance over all other competitors. Beyond mathematically well-defined symmetries on a plane, Sym-NET demonstrates abilities to identify viewpoint-varied 3D symmetries, partially occluded symmetrical objects and symmetries at a semantic level.
There have been some shallow-network reflection detection approaches (well before the current deep learning craze). Zielke al @cite_34 use a static feed forward method to enhance the symmetric edges for detection. The max operation between the different orientations is similar to other voting systems @cite_69 . Fukushima and Kikuchi @cite_41 @cite_73 present another neural network method for detecting reflection symmetry around the center of an image. They use a 4-layer network to find the symmetry axis. Skeletonization , a related problem to reflection detection, has attracted a lot of attention recently @cite_6 @cite_20 @cite_9 @cite_17 . Shen al @cite_66 use a deep CNN to learn symmetry at multiple scales and fuse the final output together. The network needs object skeleton ground-truth for the particular scale of the objects. The network outputs a skeleton heatmap which is thresholded to produce a binary image denoting the detected skeletons.
@cite_69 @cite_73 @cite_41 @cite_9 @cite_6 @cite_34 @cite_66 @cite_20 @cite_17
1985874902 1988809745 174734558 1920849937 1541124573 2325368899 2160306297
Object skeletons are useful for object representation and object detection. They are complementary to the object contour, and provide extra information, such as how object scale (thickness) varies among object parts. But object skeleton extraction from natural images is very challenging, because it requires the extractor to be able to capture both local and non-local image context in order to determine the scale of each skeleton pixel. In this paper, we present a novel fully convolutional network with multiple scale-associated side outputs to address this problem. By observing the relationship between the receptive field sizes of the different layers in the network and the skeleton scales they can capture, we introduce two scale-associated side outputs to each stage of the network. The network is trained by multi-task learning, where one task is skeleton localization to classify whether a pixel is a skeleton pixel or not, and the other is skeleton scale prediction to regress the scale of each skeleton pixel. Supervision is imposed at different stages by guiding the scale-associated side outputs toward the ground-truth skeletons at the appropriate scales. The responses of the multiple scale-associated side outputs are then fused in a scale-specific way to detect skeleton pixels using multiple scales effectively. Our method achieves promising results on two skeleton extraction datasets, and significantly outperforms other competitors. In addition, the usefulness of the obtained skeletons and scales (thickness) are verified on two object detection applications: foreground object segmentation and object proposal detection. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach – ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets – a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a self‐citation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation – using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings – ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ... A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results.