Abstract The task of object viewpoint estimation has been a challenge since the early days of computer vision. To estimate the viewpoint (or pose) of an object, people have mostly looked at object intrinsic features, such as shape or appearance. Surprisingly, informative features provided by other, extrinsic elements in the scene, have so far mostly been ignored. At the same time, contextual cues have been proven to be of great benefit for related tasks such as object detection or action recognition. In this paper, we explore how information from other objects in the scene can be exploited for viewpoint estimation. In particular, we look at object configurations by following a relational neighbor-based approach for reasoning about object relations. We show that, starting from noisy object detections and viewpoint estimates, exploiting the estimated viewpoint and location of other objects in the scene can lead to improved object viewpoint predictions. Experiments on the KITTI dataset demonstrate that object configurations can indeed be used as a complementary cue to appearance-based viewpoint estimation. Our analysis reveals that the proposed context-based method can improve object viewpoint estimation by reducing specific types of viewpoint estimation errors commonly made by methods that only consider local information. Moreover, considering contextual information produces superior performance in scenes where a high number of object instances occur. Finally, our results suggest that, following a cautious relational neighbor formulation brings improvements over its aggressive counterpart for the task of object viewpoint estimation.
From the perspective of the Collective Classification literature @cite_59 , specifically on the inference side, our method is inspired by @cite_35 @cite_36 . This is a type of inference that seeks to identify and exploit the more certain relational information. Such a cautious approach was used in @cite_3 for labeling object superpixels. In @cite_3 , discriminative relations were mined between object regions and discriminative attributes were discovered per relation. In @cite_66 , relations between objects were considered to improve object detection by penalizing out-of-context object hypotheses. During inference, the object hypotheses with highest certainty are classified first and then used to bootstrap the other objects. Based on their experiments, it was concluded that all cases following this cautious iterative approach resulted in better object detection performance than when considering the neighboring objects at once. In this work, we start from the observations of @cite_66 , and explore a cautious counterpart of @cite_7 with the objective of verifying whether the observations made for object detection also hold for the task of object viewpoint estimation. To this end, we first estimate the viewpoint of the objects with higher certainty and then use these objects to predict the viewpoints of the other ones.
@cite_35 @cite_7 @cite_36 @cite_3 @cite_59 @cite_66
2100045227 2127769904 2121250409 1800471361 1974412194
It is by now generally accepted that reasoning about the relationships between objects (and object hypotheses) can improve the accuracy of object detection methods. Relations between objects allow to reject inconsistent hypotheses and reduce the uncertainty of the initial hypotheses. However, most methods to date reason about object relations in a relatively crude way. In this paper we propose an alternative using cautious inference. Building on ideas from Collective Classification, we favor the most confident hypotheses as sources of contextual information and give higher relevance to the object relations observed during training. Additionally, we propose to cluster the pairwise relations into relationships. Our experiments on part of the KITTI data benchmark and the MIT StreetScenes dataset show that both steps improve the performance of relational classifiers. Citation relationship between scientific publications has been successfully used for scholarly bibliometrics, information retrieval and data mining tasks, and citation-based recommendation algorithms are well documented. While previous studies investigated citation relations from various viewpoints, most of them share the same assumption that, if paper1 cites paper2 (or author1 cites author2), they are connected, regardless of citation importance, sentiment, reason, topic, or motivation. However, this assumption is oversimplified. In this study, we employ an innovative "context-rich heterogeneous network" approach, which paves a new way for citation recommendation task. In the network, we characterize 1) the importance of citation relationships between citing and cited papers, and 2) the topical citation motivation. Unlike earlier studies, the citation information, in this paper, is characterized by citation textual contexts extracted from the full-text citing paper. We also propose algorithm to cope with the situation when large portion of full-text missing information exists in the bibliographic repository. Evaluation results show that, context-rich heterogeneous network can significantly enhance the citation recommendation performance. A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text.