Spurred by the potential of deep learning, computational music generation has gained renewed academic interest. A crucial issue in music generation is that of user control, especially in scenarios where the music generation process is conditioned on existing musical material. Here we propose a model for conditional kick drum track generation that takes existing musical material as input, in addition to a low-dimensional code that encodes the desired relation between the existing material and the new material to be generated. These relational codes are learned in an unsupervised manner from a music dataset. We show that codes can be sampled to create a variety of musically plausible kick drum tracks and that the model can be used to transfer kick drum patterns from one song to another. Lastly, we demonstrate that the learned codes are largely invariant to tempo and time-shift.
In addition to the VAE-based methods for control over music generation processes mentioned above, a number of other studies have applied deep learning methods to address the problem of music generation in general, as reviewed in @cite_19 . Drum track generation has been tackled using recurrent architectures @cite_4 @cite_15 , Restricted Boltzmann Machines @cite_5 , and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) @cite_3 . Approaches to the generation process may rely on sampling from some latent representation of the material to be generated @cite_20 @cite_11 , possibly in an incremental fashion @cite_6 , or conditioning on user-provided information (such as a style label @cite_13 , unary @cite_1 , or structural @cite_12 constraints). @cite_16 demonstrates style transfer for audio. GANs are used in @cite_3 @cite_2 , where the output of the generation process is determined by providing some (time-varying) noise, in combination with conditioning on existing material. Similar to our study, @cite_18 uses a GAE to model between musical material in an autoregressive prediction task. To our knowledge this is the first use of GAEs for conditional music generation.
@cite_18 @cite_4 @cite_1 @cite_3 @cite_6 @cite_19 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_16 @cite_13 @cite_12 @cite_20 @cite_11
2886204396 2889880375 2901638613 2963681776 2963575853 2752134738 2884558435 2792826772 2766465839 2579406683 2792210438 2805697608
In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Scholars are increasingly citing electronic “web references” which are not preserved in libraries or full text archives. WebCite is a new standard for citing web references. To “webcite” a document involves archiving the cited Web page through www.webcitation.org and citing the WebCite permalink instead of (or in addition to) the unstable live Web page. This journal has amended its “instructions for authors” accordingly, asking authors to archive cited Web pages before submitting a manuscript. Almost 200 other journals are already using the system. We discuss the rationale for WebCite, its technology, and how scholars, editors, and publishers can benefit from the service. Citing scholars initiate an archiving process of all cited Web references, ideally before they submit a manuscript. Authors of online documents and websites which are expected to be cited by others can ensure that their work is permanently available by creating an archived copy using WebCite and providing the citation information including the WebCite link on their Web document(s). Editors should ask their authors to cache all cited Web addresses (Uniform Resource Locators, or URLs) “prospectively” before submitting their manuscripts to their journal. Editors and publishers should also instruct their copyeditors to cache cited Web material if the author has not done so already. Finally, WebCite can process publisher submitted “citing articles” (submitted for example as eXtensible Markup Language [XML] documents) to automatically archive all cited Web pages shortly before or on publication. Finally, WebCite can act as a focussed crawler, caching retrospectively references of already published articles. Copyright issues are addressed by honouring respective Internet standards (robot exclusion files, no-cache and no-archive tags). Long-term preservation is ensured by agreements with libraries and digital preservation organizations. The resulting WebCite Index may also have applications for research assessment exercises, being able to measure the impact of Web services and published Web documents through access and Web citation metrics. @PARASPLIT [J Med Internet Res 2005;7(5):e60] A new form of document coupling called co-citation is defined as the frequency with which two documents are cited together. The co-citation frequency of two scientific papers can be determined by comparing lists of citing documents in the Science Citation Index and counting identical entries. Networks of co-cited papers can be generated for specific scientific specialties, and an example is drawn from the literature of particle physics. Co-citation patterns are found to differ significantly from bibliographic coupling patterns, but to agree generally with patterns of direct citation. Clusters of co-cited papers provide a new way to study the specialty structure of science. They may provide a new approach to indexing and to the creation of SDI profiles.