Transformation Equivariant Representations (TERs) aim to capture the intrinsic visual structures that equivary to various transformations by expanding the notion of translation equivariance underlying the success of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). For this purpose, we present both deterministic AutoEncoding Transformations (AET) and probabilistic AutoEncoding Variational Transformations (AVT) models to learn visual representations from generic groups of transformations. While the AET is trained by directly decoding the transformations from the learned representations, the AVT is trained by maximizing the joint mutual information between the learned representation and transformations. This results in Generalized TERs (GTERs) equivariant against transformations in a more general fashion by capturing complex patterns of visual structures beyond the conventional linear equivariance under a transformation group. The presented approach can be extended to (semi-)supervised models by jointly maximizing the mutual information of the learned representation with both labels and transformations. Experiments demonstrate the proposed models outperform the state-of-the-art models in both unsupervised and (semi-)supervised tasks.
On the other hand, Generative Adversarial Nets (GANs) have also been used to train unsupervised representations. Unlike the auto-encoders, the GANs @cite_15 and their variants @cite_24 @cite_5 @cite_21 @cite_31 generate data from the noises drawn from a simple distribution, with a discriminator trained adversarially to distinguish between real and fake data. The sampled noises can be viewed as the representation of generated data over a manifold, and one can train an encoder by inverting the generator to find the generating noise. This can be implemented by jointly training a pair of mutually inverse generator and encoder @cite_24 @cite_5 . There also exist better generalizable GANs in producing unseen data based on the Lipschitz assumption on the real data distribution @cite_21 @cite_31 , which can give rise to more powerful representations of data out of training examples @cite_24 @cite_5 @cite_25 . Compared with the Auto-Encoders, GANs do not rely on learning one-to-one reconstruction of data; instead, they aim to generate the entire distribution of data.
@cite_31 @cite_21 @cite_24 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_25
2580360036 2412320034 2411541852 2099471712 2894573160
In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. A new form of document coupling called co-citation is defined as the frequency with which two documents are cited together. The co-citation frequency of two scientific papers can be determined by comparing lists of citing documents in the Science Citation Index and counting identical entries. Networks of co-cited papers can be generated for specific scientific specialties, and an example is drawn from the literature of particle physics. Co-citation patterns are found to differ significantly from bibliographic coupling patterns, but to agree generally with patterns of direct citation. Clusters of co-cited papers provide a new way to study the specialty structure of science. They may provide a new approach to indexing and to the creation of SDI profiles. Scholars are increasingly citing electronic “web references” which are not preserved in libraries or full text archives. WebCite is a new standard for citing web references. To “webcite” a document involves archiving the cited Web page through www.webcitation.org and citing the WebCite permalink instead of (or in addition to) the unstable live Web page. This journal has amended its “instructions for authors” accordingly, asking authors to archive cited Web pages before submitting a manuscript. Almost 200 other journals are already using the system. We discuss the rationale for WebCite, its technology, and how scholars, editors, and publishers can benefit from the service. Citing scholars initiate an archiving process of all cited Web references, ideally before they submit a manuscript. Authors of online documents and websites which are expected to be cited by others can ensure that their work is permanently available by creating an archived copy using WebCite and providing the citation information including the WebCite link on their Web document(s). Editors should ask their authors to cache all cited Web addresses (Uniform Resource Locators, or URLs) “prospectively” before submitting their manuscripts to their journal. Editors and publishers should also instruct their copyeditors to cache cited Web material if the author has not done so already. Finally, WebCite can process publisher submitted “citing articles” (submitted for example as eXtensible Markup Language [XML] documents) to automatically archive all cited Web pages shortly before or on publication. Finally, WebCite can act as a focussed crawler, caching retrospectively references of already published articles. Copyright issues are addressed by honouring respective Internet standards (robot exclusion files, no-cache and no-archive tags). Long-term preservation is ensured by agreements with libraries and digital preservation organizations. The resulting WebCite Index may also have applications for research assessment exercises, being able to measure the impact of Web services and published Web documents through access and Web citation metrics. @PARASPLIT [J Med Internet Res 2005;7(5):e60]