In many face recognition applications, there is large amount of face data with two images for each person. One is an ID photo for face enrollment, and the other is a probe photo captured on spot. Most existing methods are designed for training data with limited breadth (relatively small class number) and sufficient depth (many samples for each class). They would meet great challenges when applied on this ID vs. Spot (IvS) data, including the under-represented intra-class variations and the excessive demand on computing devices. In this paper, we propose a deep learning based large-scale bisample learning (LBL) method for IvS face recognition. To tackle the bisample problem that there are only two samples for each class, a classification-verification-classification (CVC) training strategy is proposed to progressively enhance the IvS performance. Besides, a dominant prototype softmax (DP-softmax) is incorporated to make the deep learning applicable on large-scale classes. We conduct LBL on a IvS face dataset with more than two million identities. Experimental results show the proposed method achieves superior performance than previous ones, validating the effectiveness of LBL on IvS face recognition.
intends to recognize new classes by few samples @cite_17 . Generally, low-shot learning transfers the knowledge from a well-posed source domain to the low-shot target domain. Siamese net @cite_49 trains a siamese CNN by same-or-different classification on the source domain and extracts the deep features for nearest neighbour matching in the target domain. MANN @cite_33 @cite_66 @cite_52 memorizes the features of examples in the source domain to help predict the under-labeled classes. Model regression @cite_51 @cite_59 directly transfers the neural network weights across domains. The L2-regularization on features @cite_24 @cite_44 @cite_62 can prevent the network from ignoring low-shot classes. Besides, virtual sample generation @cite_44 @cite_23 and semi-supervised samples @cite_7 are found effective in promoting low-shot classes. Although both low-shot learning and bisample learning intend to learn a concept with insufficient samples, they differ in that low-shot learning is close-set classification but bisample learning is open-set classification where the testing samples definitely belong to unseen classes.
@cite_62 @cite_33 @cite_7 @cite_52 @cite_24 @cite_44 @cite_49 @cite_59 @cite_23 @cite_51 @cite_66 @cite_17
2751503278 2399033357 2953214648 2963341924 2737691244 2562986790 2782415368 2519882289 2115733720
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . A new form of document coupling called co-citation is defined as the frequency with which two documents are cited together. The co-citation frequency of two scientific papers can be determined by comparing lists of citing documents in the Science Citation Index and counting identical entries. Networks of co-cited papers can be generated for specific scientific specialties, and an example is drawn from the literature of particle physics. Co-citation patterns are found to differ significantly from bibliographic coupling patterns, but to agree generally with patterns of direct citation. Clusters of co-cited papers provide a new way to study the specialty structure of science. They may provide a new approach to indexing and to the creation of SDI profiles.