Arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI is a noninvasive technique for measuring quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF), but the measurement is subject to a low signal-to-noise-ratio(SNR). Various post-processing methods have been proposed to denoise ASL MRI but only provide moderate improvement. Deep learning (DL) is an emerging technique that can learn the most representative signal from data without prior modeling which can be highly complex and analytically indescribable. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the record breaking performance of DL can be translated into ASL MRI denoising. We used convolutional neural network (CNN) to build the DL ASL denosing model (DL-ASL) to inherently consider the inter-voxel correlations. To better guide DL-ASL training, we incorporated prior knowledge about ASL MRI: the structural similarity between ASL CBF map and grey matter probability map. A relatively large sample data were used to train the model which was subsequently applied to a new set of data for testing. Experimental results showed that DL-ASL achieved state-of-the-art denoising performance for ASL MRI as compared to current routine methods in terms of higher SNR, keeping CBF quantification quality while shorten the acquisition time by 75 , and automatic partial volume correction.
Imaging denoising is a classic low-level vision problem which have been widely studied in past decades. The image prior modeling often play a central role in image denoising. Traditional methods that used image prior knowledge as regularization techniques, scuh as nonlocal self-similarity models @cite_8 @cite_17 @cite_15 @cite_11 , Markov Random Field (MRF) @cite_9 @cite_12 @cite_19 and spares models @cite_0 @cite_13 , have shown very promising performance. However, in traditional denoising methods, image prior knowledge are explicitly pre-defined, which are often limited in capturing the full characteristics of image structure and limited in blind image denoising.
@cite_8 @cite_9 @cite_17 @cite_0 @cite_19 @cite_15 @cite_13 @cite_12 @cite_11
2097073572 2056370875 2153663612 2130184048 1978749115
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach – ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets – a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a self‐citation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation – using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings – ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ... The old Asian legend about the blind men and the elephant comes to mind when looking at how different authors of scientific papers describe a piece of related prior work. It turns out that different citations to the same paper often focus on different aspects of that paper and that neither provides a full description of its full set of contributions. In this article, we will describe our investigation of this phenomenon. We studied citation summaries in the context of research papers in the biomedical domain. A citation summary is the set of citing sentences for a given article and can be used as a surrogate for the actual article in a variety of scenarios. It contains information that was deemed by peers to be important. Our study shows that citation summaries overlap to some extent with the abstracts of the papers and that they also differ from them in that they focus on different aspects of these papers than do the abstracts. In addition to this, co-cited articles (which are pairs of articles cited by another article) tend to be similar. We show results based on a lexical similarity metric called cohesion to justify our claims. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text.