We provide a framework for modeling social network formation through conditional multinomial logit models from discrete choice and random utility theory, in which each new edge is viewed as a “choice” made by a node to connect to another node, based on (generic) features of the other nodes available to make a connection. This perspective on network formation unifies existing models such as preferential attachment, triadic closure, and node fitness, which are all special cases, and thereby provides a flexible means for conceptualizing, estimating, and comparing models. The lens of discrete choice theory also provides several new tools for analyzing social network formation; for example, the significance of node features can be evaluated in a statistically rigorous manner, and mixtures of existing models can be estimated by adapting known expectation-maximization algorithms. We demonstrate the flexibility of our framework through examples that analyze a number of synthetic and real-world datasets. For example, we provide rigorous methods for estimating preferential attachment models and show how to separate the effects of preferential attachment and triadic closure. Non-parametric estimates of the importance of degree show a highly linear trend, and we expose the importance of looking carefully at nodes with degree zero. Examining the formation of a large citation graph, we find evidence for an increased role of degree when accounting for age.
There is a long history of parameter estimation in network formation processes @cite_67 @cite_19 . Probably the most studied formation model is preferential attachment @cite_52 , which relates the likelihood of new nodes connecting to a node @math to @math 's degree. More references on PA, since we claim it is the most studied? The original justification of the model was based on the degree distribution of the resulting graph qualitatively matching those of several early large-scale empirical networks. Shortly after, a number of authors proposed non-parametric methods to measure preferential attachment by counting what the degrees of the nodes getting edges are and normalizing them by the relative likelihood of those degrees @cite_41 @cite_7 @cite_73 . There are several generalizations of preferential attachment, where node @math is chosen proportional to some function @math of the degree @math of node @math (here, @math is standard preferential attachment). TODO: Need references if claiming there are several generalizations Much of this research has focused on the case when @math , i.e., attachment is preferential to some (latent) power @math of the degree @cite_17 .
@cite_67 @cite_7 @cite_41 @cite_52 @cite_19 @cite_73 @cite_17
1966342871 1556758605 2008620264 1983454294 2032516423
We consider a growing network, whose growth algorithm is based on the preferential attachment typical for scale-free constructions, but where the long-range bonds are disadvantaged. Thus, the probability of getting connected to a site at distance d is proportional to @math where is a tunable parameter of the model. We show that the properties of the networks grown with @math are close to those of the genuine scale-free construction, while for @math the structure of the network is quite different. Thus, in this regime, the node degree distribution is no longer a power law, and it is well represented by a stretched exponential. On the other hand, the small-world property of the growing networks is preserved at all values of . We give an explicit construction of the weak local limit of a class of preferential attachment graphs. This limit contains all local information and allows several computations that are otherwise hard, for example, joint degree distributions and, more generally, the limiting distribution of subgraphs in balls of any given radius @math around a random vertex in the preferential attachment graph. We also establish the finite-volume corrections which give the approach to the limit. A key ingredient of many current models proposed to capture the topological evolution of complex networks is the hypothesis that highly connected nodes increase their connectivity faster than their less connected peers, a phenomenon called preferential attachment. Measurements on four networks, namely the science citation network, Internet, actor collaboration and science coauthorship network indicate that the rate at which nodes acquire links depends on the node's degree, offering direct quantitative support for the presence of preferential attachment. We find that for the first two systems the attachment rate depends linearly on the node degree, while for the last two the dependence follows a sublinear power law. Our work introduces an approach for estimating the contribution of attachment mechanisms to the formation of growing networks. We present a generic model in which growth is driven by the continuous attachment of new nodes according to random and preferential linkage with a fixed probability. Past approaches apply likelihood analysis to estimate the probability of occurrence of each mechanism at a particular network instance, exploiting the concavity of the likelihood function at each point in time. However, the probability of connecting to existing nodes, and consequently the likelihood function itself, varies as networks grow. We establish conditions under which applying likelihood analysis guarantees the existence of a local maximum of the time-varying likelihood function and prove that a expectation maximization algorithm provides a convergent estimate. Furthermore, the in-degree distributions of the nodes in the growing networks is analytically characterized. Simulations show that, under the proposed conditions, expectation maximization and maximum-likelihood accurately estimate the actual contribution of each mechanism, and in-degree distributions converge to a stationary distributions.