Expanding the inclusion criteria for nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis: Outcomes and cost. Non-operative management of early, acute appendicitis in children: is it safe and effective? Outcomes of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Pregnancy. Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis. A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (APPAC trial) Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. The outcome of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis with diameters ≤ 10 mm. Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial Conservative antibiotic treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis is feasible Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial. Long-Term Results Following Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Adults Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. Subcuticular Skin Closure as a Standard Approach to Emergency Appendectomy in Children: Prospective Clinical Trial Comparison of therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess Long-term outcomes of patients with nonsurgically managed uncomplicated appendicitis. Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. Abdominal Drainage Following Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy A Prospective Randomized Comparison Initial antibiotic treatment for acute simple appendicitis in children is safe: Short-term results from a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study. Resource utilization and outcomes from percutaneous drainage and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess. A complete course of intravenous antibiotics vs a combination of intravenous and oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective, randomized trial.
BACKGROUND Carefully selected children with early appendicitis may be managed nonoperatively . However , it is unknown whether nonoperative management ( NOM ) is applicable to all patients with uncomplicated appendicitis . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis with exp and ed inclusion criteria . METHODS A prospect i ve , nonr and omized patient-preference study comparing NOM versus laparoscopic appendectomy ( LA ) was performed in children with radiographic/ clinical evidence of uncomplicated appendicitis . RESULTS Demographics , laboratory values , and clinical presentation were similar between the  NOM ( n=51 ) and LA ( n=32 ) groups . Initial failure rate was 31 % . The outcomes were similar between groups , except that NOM had fewer days of pain medication . Patients who failed NOM had a longer duration of symptoms prior to admission . Patients with appendicolith had a failure rate of 50 % compared to 24 % without appendicolith . The recurrence rate was 26 % . Overall , 51 % avoided appendectomy . Costs were similar between NOM and LA . CONCLUSIONS When exp and ing the inclusion criteria for children with presumed uncomplicated appendicitis , NOM was associated with high failure and recurrence rates . These high rates may be because of the inclusion of patients with complicated appendicitis and patients with an appendicolith . Even in this setting of less-restrictive exclusion criteria , NOM remained cost neutral . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE LEVEL II ( Treatment Study : Prospect i ve Comparative Study ) PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine if early , acute appendicitis in children can be safely and effectively managed with antibiotics alone . METHODS A retrospective review was performed of children ( < 18 yrs ) treated non-operatively ( NOM ) for early , acute appendicitis since May 2012 . These were compared to patients treated with appendectomy between January 2011 and October 2011 ( OM ) . Inclusion criteria included : ( a ) symptoms < 48 h , ( b ) localized peritonitis , and ( c ) ultrasound findings consistent with early , acute appendicitis . RESULTS Twelve patients ( 66 % female , mean age 12.2,SD=4.2 yrs ) were treated non-operatively , while 12 ( 50 % female , mean age 12.5,SD=3.2 yrs ) were treated operatively . Two NOM children ( 16.7 % ) required initial appendectomy . One patient developed recurrent appendicitis requiring appendectomy 7 months post-discharge . Four other NOM patients returned with symptoms but did not require admission or surgery . Two OM patients ( 8.3 % ) had hospital visits and admissions related to surgical site infections . Mean length of stay ( LOS ) for the first visit was 1.5 days ( SD=1.0d ) ( NOM ) vs. 1.3 days ( SD=0.5d ) ( OM ) ( p=0.61 ) . Including first and subsequent admissions , mean LOS was 1.8 days ( SD=1.1d ) ( NOM ) vs. 1.7 days ( SD=1.5d ) ( OM ) ( p=0.97 ) . CONCLUSION Early acute appendicitis in appropriately selected children can be successfully treated non-operatively . R and omized trials with longer follow-up are required OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study is to determine the feasibility and safety of antibiotics for uncomplicated simple appendicitis in pregnancy . METHOD We conducted a 6-year prospect i ve observational study on 20 pregnant women in whom uncomplicated simple appendicitis ( appendiceal diameter ≤11 mm and with no signs of appendicoliths , perforation , or abscess ) was radiologically verified and managed with a 4-day course of antibiotics . Treatment failure rate , defined as the need for an appendectomy during hospitalization and recurrence in the follow-up period ( median 25 months ) , and maternal or fetal complications during the pregnancy were evaluated . RESULTS Mean age of patients was 33.4 years , and gestational age was 17.8 weeks . Three patients failed to respond to antibiotic therapy  during hospitalization and underwent subsequent appendectomy ( 2 suppurative and 1 perforated appendicitis ) . There was 1 wound infection postoperatively . During follow-up , 2 patients during their ongoing pregnancy experienced recurrence at 3 and 6 months post-treatment , and a new course of antibiotics was determined . Patients also experienced recurrence at 8 and 10 months post-treatment and underwent appendectomy . Treatment failure occurred in 5 patients ( 25 % ) with no fetal complications during the pregnancy . CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis in pregnancy may be a feasible treatment option without severe maternal and fetal complications PURPOSE Urgent appendectomy has long been the st and ard of care for acute appendicitis . Six r and omized trials have demonstrated that antibiotics can safely treat appendicitis , but approximately 1 in 4 of these patients eventually requires appendectomy . Overall treatment success may be limited by complex disease including perforation . Patients ׳ success on antibiotic therapy may depend on preoperative identification of complex disease on imaging . However , the effectiveness of computed tomography ( CT ) in differentiating complex disease including perforated from nonperforated appendicitis remains to be determined . The purpose of this study was to assess the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of CT in determining appendiceal perforation in patients operated for acute appendicitis . METHODS We performed a retrospective review of pathology and radiology reports from consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with suspicion for acute appendicitis between January 2012 and May 2015 .  CT scans were re- review ed by abdominal imaging fellowship-trained radiologists using st and ardized criteria , and the radiologists were blinded to pathology and surgical findings . Radiologists specifically noted presence or absence of periappendiceal gas , abscess , appendicolith , fat str and ing , and bowel wall thickening . The overall radiologic impression as well as these specific imaging findings was compared to results of pathology and operative reports . Pathology reports were considered the st and ard for diagnostic accuracy . RESULTS Eighty-nine patients ( 65 % male , average age of 34 years ) presenting with right lower quadrant pain  underwent CT imaging and prompt appendectomy . Final pathology reported perforation in 48 % ( n = 43 ) of cases . Radiologic diagnosis of perforation was reported in 9 % ( n = 8) , correctly identifying perforation in 37.5 % ( n = 3 ) , and incorrectly reporting perforation in 62.5 % of nonperforated cases per pathology . Radiology missed 93 % ( n = 40 ) of perforations postoperatively diagnosed by pathology . There was no secondary finding ( fat str and ing , diameter > 13 mm , abscess , cecal wall thickening , periappendiceal gas , simple fluid collection , appendicolith , and phlegmon ) with a clinical ly reliable sensitivity or specificity to predict perforated appendicitis . Surgeon׳s report of perforation was consistent with the pathology report of perforation in only 28 % of cases . CONCLUSIONS The usefulness of a CT for determining perforation in acute appendicitis is limited , and methods to improve precision in identifying patients with complicated appendicitis should be explored as this may help for improving risk prediction for failure of treatment with antibiotic therapy and help guide patients and providers in shared decision-making for treatment options Background Although the st and ard treatment of acute appendicitis ( AA ) consists of an early appendectomy , there has recently been both an interest and an increase in the use of antibiotic therapy as the primary treatment for uncomplicated AA . However , the use of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of uncomplicated AA is still controversial . Methods / design The APPAC trial is a r and omized prospect i ve controlled , open label , non-inferiority multicenter trial design ed to compare antibiotic therapy ( ertapenem ) with emergency appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated AA . The primary endpoint of the study is the success of the r and omized treatment . In the antibiotic treatment arm successful treatment is defined as being discharged from the hospital without the need for surgical intervention and no recurrent appendicitis during a minimum follow-up of one-year ( treatment efficacy ) . Treatment efficacy in the operative treatment arm is defined as successful appendectomy evaluated to be 100 % . Secondary endpoints are post-intervention complications , overall morbidity and mortality , the length of hospital stay and sick leave , treatment costs and pain scores ( VAS , visual analoque scale ) . A maximum of 610 adult patients ( aged 18–60 years ) with a CT scan confirmed uncomplicated AA will be enrolled from six hospitals and r and omized by a closed envelope method in a 1:1 ratio either to undergo emergency appendectomy or to receive ertapenem ( 1 g per day ) for three days continued by oral levofloxacin ( 500 mg per day ) plus metronidazole ( 1.5 g per day ) for seven days . Follow-up by a telephone interview will be at 1 week , 2 months and 1 , 3 , 5 and 10 years ; the primary and secondary endpoints of the trial will be evaluated at each time point . Discussion The APPAC trial aims to provide level I evidence to support the hypothesis that approximately 75–85 % of patients with uncomplicated AA can be treated with effective antibiotic  therapy avoiding unnecessary appendectomies and the related operative morbidity , also result ing in major cost savings . Trial registration Clinical IMPORTANCE An increasing amount of evidence supports the use of antibiotics instead of surgery for treating patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis . OBJECTIVE To compare antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by computed tomography ( CT ) . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS The Appendicitis Acuta ( APPAC ) multicenter , open-label , noninferiority r and omized clinical trial was conducted from November 2009 until June 2012 in Finl and . The trial enrolled 530 patients aged 18 to 60 years with uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by a CT scan . Patients were r and omly assigned to early appendectomy or antibiotic treatment with a 1-year follow-up period . INTERVENTIONS Patients r and omized to antibiotic therapy received intravenous ertapenem ( 1 g/d ) for 3 days followed by 7 days of oral levofloxacin ( 500 mg once daily ) and metronidazole ( 500 mg 3 times per day ) . Patients r and omized to the surgical treatment group were assigned to undergo st and ard open appendectomy . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point for the surgical intervention was the successful completion of an appendectomy . The primary end point for antibiotic-treated patients was discharge from the hospital without the need for surgery and no recurrent appendicitis during a 1-year follow-up period . RESULTS There were 273 patients in the surgical group and 257 in the antibiotic group . Of 273 patients in the surgical group , all but 1 underwent successful appendectomy , result ing in a success rate of 99.6 % ( 95 % CI , 98.0 % to 100.0 % ) . In the antibiotic group , 70 patients ( 27.3 % ; 95 % CI , 22.0 % to 33.2 % ) underwent appendectomy within 1 year of initial presentation for appendicitis . Of the 256 patients available for follow-up in the antibiotic group , 186 ( 72.7 % ; 95 % CI , 66.8 % to 78.0 % ) did not require surgery . The intention-to-treat analysis yielded a difference in treatment efficacy between groups of -27.0 % ( 95 % CI , -31.6 % to ∞ ) ( P = .89 ) . Given the prespecified noninferiority margin of 24 % , we were unable to demonstrate noninferiority of antibiotic treatment relative to surgery . Of the 70 patients r and omized to antibiotic treatment who subsequently underwent appendectomy , 58 ( 82.9 % ; 95 % CI , 72.0 % to 90.8 % ) had uncomplicated appendicitis , 7 ( 10.0 % ; 95 % CI , 4.1 % to 19.5 % ) had complicated acute appendicitis , and 5 ( 7.1 % ; 95 % CI , 2.4 % to 15.9 % ) did not have appendicitis but received appendectomy for suspected recurrence . There were no intra-abdominal abscesses or other major complications associated with delayed appendectomy in patients r and omized to antibiotic treatment . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with CT-proven , uncomplicated appendicitis , antibiotic treatment did not meet the prespecified criterion for noninferiority compared with appendectomy . Most patients r and omized to antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis did not require appendectomy during the 1-year follow-up period , and those who required appendectomy did not experience significant complications . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT01022567 PURPOSE Although many patients receive antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis , the relatively high treatment failure and recurrence rates are problematic . We assumed that patients with appendicitis and appendiceal diameters ≤ 10 mm , have better outcomes . The purpose of this prospect i ve non-r and omized study was to assess the outcomes of antibiotic therapy in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis and appendiceal diameters ≤ 10 mm . METHODS Over 2 years , we enrolled 119 patients who initially received antibiotic therapy .  The failure of antibiotic therapy was defined as the need for appendectomy and true appendicitis . Peritonitis was defined as either complicated appendicitis or intra-abdominal abscess postoperatively . We evaluated the rates of treatment failure , peritonitis , and recurrence . RESULTS Nine patients ( 7.6 % ) failed to respond to initial antibiotic therapy , and 6 had true appendicitis after subsequent surgery . Two patients had complicated appendicitis ( peritonitis ) , but no patient displayed intra-abdominal abscess postoperatively . During a median follow-up period months of 14 months , 14 patients ( 12.7 % ) experienced recurrence . CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic therapy without surgery may be a safe treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in select patients with appendiceal diameters ≤ 10 mm Importance Short-term results support antibiotics as an alternative to surgery for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis , but long-term outcomes are not known . Objective To determine the late recurrence rate of appendicitis after antibiotic therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis . Design , Setting , and Participants Five-year observational follow-up of patients in the Appendicitis Acuta ( APPAC ) multicenter r and omized clinical trial comparing appendectomy with antibiotic therapy , in which 530 patients aged 18 to 60 years with computed tomography – confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis were r and omized to undergo an appendectomy ( n = 273 ) or receive antibiotic therapy ( n = 257 ) . The initial trial was conducted from November 2009 to June 2012 in Finl and ; last follow-up was September 6 , 2017 . This current analysis focused on assessing the 5-year outcomes for the group of patients treated with antibiotics alone . Interventions Open appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy with intravenous ertapenem for 3 days followed by 7 days of oral levofloxacin and metronidazole . Main Outcomes and Measures In this analysis , prespecified secondary end points reported at 5-year follow-up included late ( after 1 year ) appendicitis recurrence after antibiotic treatment , complications , length of hospital stay , and sick leave . Results Of the 530 patients ( 201 women ; 329 men ) enrolled in the trial , 273 patients ( median age , 35 years [ IQR , 27 - 46 ] ) were r and omized to undergo appendectomy , and 257 ( median age , 33 years , [ IQR , 26 - 47 ] ) were r and omized to receive antibiotic therapy . In addition to 70 patients who initially received antibiotics but underwent appendectomy within the first year ( 27.3 % [ 95 % CI , 22.0%-33.2 % ] ; 70/256 ) , 30 additional antibiotic-treated patients ( 16.1 % [ 95 % CI , 11.2%-22.2 % ] ; 30/186 ) underwent appendectomy between 1 and 5 years . The cumulative incidence of appendicitis recurrence was 34.0 % ( 95 % CI , 28.2%-40.1 % ; 87/256 ) at 2 years , 35.2 % ( 95 % CI , 29.3%-41.4 % ; 90/256 ) at 3 years , 37.1 % ( 95 % CI , 31.2%-43.3 % ; 95/256 ) at 4 years , and 39.1 % ( 95 % CI , 33.1%-45.3 % ; 100/256 ) at 5 years . Of the 85 patients in the antibiotic group who subsequently underwent appendectomy for recurrent appendicitis , 76 had uncomplicated appendicitis , 2 had complicated appendicitis , and 7 did not have appendicitis . At 5 years , the overall complication rate ( surgical site infections , incisional hernias , abdominal pain , and obstructive symptoms ) was 24.4 % ( 95 % CI , 19.2%-30.3 % ) ( n = 60/246 ) in the appendectomy group and 6.5 % ( 95 % CI , 3.8%-10.4 % ) ( n = 16/246 ) in antibiotic group ( P < .001 ) , which calculates to 17.9 percentage points ( 95 % CI , 11.7 - 24.1 ) higher after surgery . There was no difference between groups for length of hospital stay , but there was a significant difference in sick leave ( 11 days more for the appendectomy group ) . Conclusions and Relevance Among patients who were initially treated with antibiotics for uncomplicated acute appendicitis , the likelihood of late recurrence within 5 years was 39.1 % . This long-term follow-up supports the feasibility of antibiotic treatment alone as an alternative to surgery for uncomplicated acute appendicitis . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : Purpose Appendectomy versus conservative antibiotic treatment ( CAT ) for children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis ( AUA ) remains unresolved , with concerns regarding the practicality of CAT . We analyzed our center ’s experience with CAT for AUA , using a protocol with strict inclusion , exclusion and treatment criteria . Methods Non-r and omized , prospect i ve cohort study included all children admitted betwee 2014 and 2016 , with clinical and laboratory tests suspicious for AUA . Data collected included clinical signs and symptoms ; laboratory , ultrasound and pathology results . Follow-up was conducted through clinic visits , telephone conversations and national registry analysis . Results Included in CAT : 362 children , 19 underwent appendectomy within 1–2 days . Overall , 75 were readmitted for recurrent acute appendicitis during 22 months ( 6–43 ) follow-up . Thirty were treated successfully with antibiotics a second time . The remaining 45 had appendectomy . Overall , 86.8 % underwent CAT with no surgery . Histology of all recurrent AUA revealed no perforations . Conclusion We confirm the feasibility of conservative management of AUA in children . A rigorous diagnostic plan with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria will lead to high success rate of CAT with a strong safety profile . CAT does not compete with surgery or render appendectomy unnecessary . It is a safe alternative to surgery in selected cases INTRODUCTION Perforated appendicitis is a common condition in children , which , in a small number of patients , may be complicated by a well-formed abscess . Initial nonoperative management with percutaneous drainage/aspiration of the abscess followed by intravenous antibiotics usually allows for an uneventful interval appendectomy . Although this strategy has become well accepted , there are no published data comparing initial nonoperative management ( drainage/interval appendectomy ) to appendectomy upon presentation with an abscess . Therefore , we conducted a r and omized trial comparing these 2 management strategies . METHODS After internal review board approval ( # 06 11 - 164 ) , children who presented with a well-defined abdominal abscess by computed tomographic imaging were r and omized on admission to laparoscopic appendectomy or intravenous antibiotics with percutaneous drainage of the abscess  ( when possible ) , followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy approximately 10 weeks later . This was a pilot study with a sample size of 40 , which was based on our recent volume of patients presenting with appendicitis and abscess . RESULTS On presentation , there were no differences between the 2 groups regarding age , weight , body mass index , sex distribution , temperature , leukocyte count , number of abscesses , or greatest 2-dimensional area of abscess in the axial view . Regarding outcomes , there were no differences in length of total hospitalization , recurrent abscess rates , or overall charges . There was a trend toward a longer operating time in patients undergoing initial appendectomy ( 61 minutes versus 42 minutes mean , P = .06 ) . CONCLUSIONS Although initial laparoscopic appendectomy trends toward a requiring longer operative time , there seems to be no advantages between these strategies in terms of total hospitalization , recurrent abscess rate , or total charges Background Antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis has gained interest and inquiries . Reports have demonstrated both safety and high resolution of symptoms and inflammation following antibiotic treatment of appendicitis , but information on long-term results is required . Our present aim was therefore to evaluate long-term recurrence rate of initial antibiotics-alone treatment for suspected acute appendicitis . Methods Patients with favourable response to antibiotics in earlier r and omized ( RCT , n = 97 ) and population -based ( PBT , n = 342 ) studies as well as subsequently treated non-r and omized ( Non-R , n = 271 ) patients are evaluated for long-term risk to relapse dem and ing surgical appendectomy ; altogether 710 patients . Results Clinical characteristics among r and omized and non-r and omized patients were similar without any statistical difference according to abdominal symptoms and degree of systemic inflammation ( CRP , WCC ) when antibiotic treatment started . Females and males showed the same results . The median follow-up time was 2162 days ( 5.92 years ) , and the range across highest and lowest follow-up was 3495 days ( range 2–3497 ) for the entire group , without significant differences among subgroups ( RCT , PBT , Non-R ) . The cumulative probability for relapse of appendicitis dem and ing appendectomy was : 0.09 , 0.12 , 0.12 and 0.13 at 1- , 2- , 3- and 5-year follow-up , with a probability of 0.86 ± 0.013 without appendectomy after 8 years . This may imply an overall benefit of 60–70 % by antibiotics during expected 10-year follow-up accounting for initial treatment failures at 10–23 % in our published reports . Conclusion Antibiotic treatment is safe and effective as a first-line therapy in unselected adults with acute appendicitis with a risk around 15 % for long-term relapse following favourable initial treatment response INTRODUCTION Appendicitis is the most common emergency condition in children . Historically , a 3-drug regimen consisting of ampicillin , gentamicin , and clindamycin ( AGC ) has been used postoperatively for perforated appendicitis . A retrospective review at our institution has found single day dosing of ceftriaxone and metronidazole ( CM ) to be a more simple and cost-effective antibiotic strategy . Therefore , we performed a prospect i ve , r and omized trial to compare efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these 2 regimens . METHODS After internal review board approval ( IRB no. 04 12 - 149 ) , children found to have perforated appendicitis at appendectomy were r and omized to either once daily dosing of CM ( 2 total doses per day ) or st and ard dosing of AGC ( 11 total doses per day ) . Perforation was defined as an identifiable hole in the appendix . The operative approach ( laparoscopic ) , length of antibiotic use , and criteria for discharge were st and ardized for the groups . Based on our retrospective analysis using length of postoperative hospitalization as a primary end point , a sample size of 100 patients was calculated for an alpha of .5 and a power of 0.82 . RESULTS One hundred patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis . On presentation , there were no differences in sex distribution , days of symptoms , temperature , or leukocyte count . There was no difference in abscess rate or wound infections between groups . The CM group result ed in significantly less antibiotic charges then the AGC group . CONCLUSIONS Once daily dosing with the 2-drug regimen ( CM ) offers a more efficient , cost-effective antibiotic management in children with perforated appendicitis without compromising infection control when compared to a traditional 3-drug regimen Abstract . We evaluated the morbidity associated with primary closure by interrupted subcuticular absorbable sutures  following emergency appendectomy .  In a prospect i ve clinical trial over a 12-month period , 216 children who underwent emergency appendectomy had skin closure using subcuticular interrupted absorbable polyglactin 4 - 0 sutures . Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics consisting of metronidazole alone or in combination with gentamicin were used in patients with suspected phlegmonous appendicitis ; a combination of metronidazole , gentamicin , and ampicillin was used when perforation of the appendix was suspected . Postoperatively , in patients with phlegmonous appendicitis  metronidazole was given for 24 hours , whereas in those with peritonitis the triple antibiotics were continued for 7 to 10 days . All patients were assessed for complications result ing from the technique of wound closure . No intraabdominal abscesses or serious complications were recorded . The overall incidence of wound infection was 1.8 % . Among children with a perforated appendix the rate of superficial wound infection was 5.7 % . There was no difference in the rate of wound infection between patients who received metronidazole alone or metronidazole plus gentamicin preoperatively . All the patients and their families were satisfied with the cosmetic results and with the fact that removal of skin sutures was unnecessary . We conclude that the use of prophylactic antibiotics permits st and ard skin closure by interrupted absorbable subcuticular suture Background The present study was design ed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess . Methods In a prospect i ve study , 50 patients with acute appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess ≥ 3 cm in size were r and omly assigned to two groups . The first group received treatment with ultrasound guided-percutaneous drainage and i.v . antibiotics ( ampicillin , cefuroxime , and metronidazole ) , and the other group received antibiotics only .  Patient ’s baseline characteristics , duration of hospital stay , and treatment outcome and complications were analyzed . Results Appendectomy was avoided in 16/25 patients in the drainage group and 2/25 patients in the non-drainage group during follow-up with RR of 0.39 ( 95 % CI = 0.22–0.62 ; p < 0.05 ) . One patient in the drainage group and 8 patients in the non-drainage group underwent surgery in the first month after the beginning of treatment . Eight patients in the drainage group and 15 in the non-drainage group underwent interval appendectomy . There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding patient demographics , abscess size , and pretreatment clinical symptoms . Hospital stay up to the subsidence of clinical and sonographic signs was significantly shorter ( p < 0.001 ) in the drainage group , with a mean difference of 6.4 days ( 95 % CI = 5.0–7.9 ; p < 0.05 ) . Conclusions Percutaneous drainage with antibiotics is a safe and effective way of treating acute perforated appendicitis . The recurrence rate for these patients is relatively low , and very often interval appendectomy is not required . For patients with periappendiceal abscess ≥ 3 cm in diameter , antibiotic therapy alone is insufficient and the recurrence rate is high BACKGROUND Emerging literature has supported the safety of nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis . STUDY DESIGN Patients with emergent , uncomplicated appendicitis were identified by appropriate ICD-9 diagnosis codes in the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development data base from 1997 to 2008 . Rates of treatment failure , recurrence , and perforation after nonsurgical management were calculated . Factors associated with treatment failure , recurrence , and perforation were identified using multivariable logistic regression . Mortality , length of stay , and total charges were compared between treatment cohorts using matched propensity score analysis . RESULTS Of 231,678 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis , the majority ( 98.5 % ) were managed operatively . Of the 3,236 nonsurgically managed patients who survived to discharge without an interval appendectomy , 5.9 % and 4.4 % experienced treatment failure or recurrence , respectively , during a median follow-up of more than 7 years . There were no mortalities associated with treatment failure or recurrence . The risk of perforation after discharge was approximately 3 % . Using multivariable analysis , race and age were significantly associated with the odds of treatment failure . Sex , age , and hospital teaching status were significantly associated with the odds of recurrence . Age and hospital teaching status were significantly associated with the odds of perforation . Matched propensity score analysis indicated that after risk adjustment , mortality rates ( 0.1 % vs 0.3 % ; p = 0.65 ) and total charges ( $ 23,243 vs $ 24,793 ; p = 0.70 ) were not statistically different between operative and nonoperative patients ; however , length of stay was significantly longer in the nonoperative treatment group ( 2.1 days vs 3.2 days ; p < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis can be safe and prompts additional investigations . Comparative effectiveness research using prospect i ve r and omized studies can be particularly useful A total of 231 children with acute appendicitis were treated at our hospitals during the 10 years between 1984 and 1993 , 53 of whom had a perforated appendix . These 53 patients were r and omly assigned to two groups at the time of surgery according to the different procedures performed . Thus , 29 children were managed by appendectomy followed by peritoneal lavage using a large amount of saline , and intravenous antibiotic therapy consisting of aminoglycoside and cephem ( lavage group ) , while the other 24 children were treated by appendectomy with silicon tube drainage and the same systemic antibiotic therapy ( drainage group ) . The mean length of hospitalization , and the mean duration s of fever and the need for fasting after laparotomy in the lavage group were significantly less than those in the drainage group : 10.1 versus 18.8 days , 2.8 versus 7.7 days , and 1.8 versus 3.5 days , respectively . The operation wounds healed well in the lavage group due to the fact that there was no drain . Wound infections occurred in two children from the lavage group and six from the drainage group . Intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in two children from the drainage group . Accordingly , peritoneal lavage appears to be superior to intraperitoneal tube drainage for the management of perforated appendicitis in children BACKGROUND / PURPOSE Laparoscopic appendectomy is an accepted way of dealing with suspected uncomplicated appendicitis in children . The role of laparoscopy in complicated acute appendicitis is more controversial . The purpose of this trial was to compare laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy in children with complicated appendicitis . METHODS A total of 102 children with suspected acute appendicitis were selected r and omly to undergo either a laparoscopic or an open appendectomy . The outcomes of 25 children with complicated appendicitis , 13 in the laparoscopic group and 12 in the open appendectomy group , were analyzed . Children , their parents , and research nurses were blinded to which procedure had been performed and remained blinded until the control visit 7 days after the operation . All 25 children completed a 30-day follow-up . RESULTS There were no differences in terms of patients ' age , sex , weight , height , and appendiceal histology between the 2 groups . All laparoscopic procedures were completed without conversion . The mean ( + /-SD ) operating time was 63 ( + /-31 ) minutes in the laparoscopic group and 37 ( + /-18 ) minutes in the open appendectomy group ( mean difference 26 minutes , 95 % CI 5 to 47 minutes , P = .02 ) . There were 2 major complications in the laparoscopic group in children with appendiceal masses . One child had an entero-cutaneous fistula of the residual appendiceal tip that needed open reoperation . Another child had a pelvic abscess that resolved with antibiotic treatment . Superficial wound infections were encountered in 2 patients in the open appendectomy group . CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic appendectomy is an alternative to open procedure in children with complicated appendicitis . Good surgical judgement is necessary in patients with an established appendiceal abscess Consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendectomy ( 283 ) or urgent cholecystectomy ( 51 ) were prospect ively studied for the development of postoperative incisional or peritoneal sepsis . Severity of the original peritoneal infection was carefully recorded , while use of a Penrose dam to drain the peritoneum was r and omized according to pre-assigned hospital number . Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were taken from the abdomen at the time of operation as well as from all postoperative infectious foci . Results demonstrated no essential differences in incidence of wound and peritoneal infection following  appendectomy  for simple or suppurative appendicitis ( 187 ) or following  cholecystectomy  for acute cholecystitis ( 51 ) . However , with gangrenous or perforative appendicitis ( 94 ) , incisional and intra-abdominal infection rates were 43 % and 45 % , respectively , when a drain was used ; yet only 29 and 13 % , respectively , without a drain . These latter differences were significant ( p < 0.001 ) . In addition , intra-abdominal abscesses were three times as likely to drain through the incision than along any tract provided by the rubber conduit . Cultures revealed that hospital pathogens accounted for a greater proportion of wound and peritoneal sepsis after cholecystectomy and appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis if a drain had been inserted than if managed otherwise . By contrast , a mixed bacterial flora was responsible for most infections following appendectomy for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis , irrespective as to use of a drain Objective The authors compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy  in a r and omized fashion with regard to length of operation , complications , hospital stay , and recovery time . Methods Adult patients ( older than 14 years of age ) with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were r and omized to either open or laparoscopic appendectomy over a 9-month period . All patients received preoperative  antibiotics . The operative time was calculated as beginning with the incision and ending when the wound was fully closed . Patients that were converted from laparoscopic to open appendectomy were considered a separate group . Return to normal activity and work were determined by question ing during postoperative clinic , telephone , or mailed question naire . Results There was a total of 169 patients r and omized , 88 to the open and 81 to the laparoscopic group . The groups were similar demographically . Of the 81 laparoscopic patients , 13 ( 16 % ) were converted to open . In the open group , 70 patients ( 79.5 % ) had acute appendicitis and 21 ( 23.9 % ) had perforative appendicitis . In the laparoscopic group , 62 patients ( 76.5 % ) had acute appendicitis and 10 ( 12.3 % ) had perforative appendicitis . There was no statistical difference in the return to activity or work between the laparoscopic and open groups . The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group ( 102.2 minutes vs. 81.7 minutes , p < 0.01 ) . The hospital stay of 2.2 days in the laparoscopic group and 4.3 days in the open group was statistically different ( p = 0.007 ) . There was no difference in the hospital stay for those with acute appendicitis ( 1.89 days vs. 2.61 days , p = 0.067 ) compared with those with a normal appendix but with pelvic inflammatory disease ( 1.1 days vs. 2.3 days , p = 0.11 ) . There was a significant difference in patients with perforative appendicitis ( 1.5 days vs. 9.5 days , p < 0.01 ) . The hospital cost for patients having laparoscopic appendectomy was $ 6077 and for an open appendectomy $ 7227 ( p = 0.164 ) . There were no increased complications associated with the laparoscopic technique . Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to open appendectomy with regard to complications , hospital stay , cost , return to activity , and return to work . There was a greater operative time involved with the laparoscopic technique . Laparoscopic appendectomy does not offer any significant benefit over the open approach for the routine patient with appendicitis BACKGROUND Initial antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis has been shown to be safe in adults ; so far , not much is known about the safety and efficacy of this treatment in children . The aims of this study were to investigate the feasibility of a r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) evaluating initial antibiotic treatment for acute appendectomy in children with acute simple appendicitis and to evaluate the safety of this approach . METHODS In a multicenter , prospect i ve cohort study patients aged 7 - 17 years with a radiologically confirmed simple appendicitis were eligible .  Intravenous antibiotics ( amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 250/25 mg/kg 4 times daily ; maximum 6,000/600 mg/d and gentamicin 7 mg/kg once daily ) were administered for 48 - 72 hours . Clinical reevaluation every 6 hours , daily blood sample s , and  ultrasound follow-up  after 48 hours was performed . In case of improvement after 48 hours , oral antibiotics were given for a total of 7 days . At any time , in case of clinical deterioration or non-improvement after 72 hours , an appendectomy could be performed . Follow-up continued until 8 weeks after discharge . Adverse events were defined as major complications of antibiotic treatment , such as allergic reactions , perforated appendicitis , and recurrent appendicitis . RESULTS Of 44 eligible patients , 25 participated ( inclusion rate , 57 % ; 95 % CI , 42%-70 % ) . Delayed appendectomy was performed in 2 , and the other 23 were without symptoms at the 8 weeks follow-up . Minor complications occurred in three patients . None of the patients suffered from an adverse event or a recurrent appendicitis . CONCLUSION Our study shows that an RCT comparing initial antibiotic treatment strategy with urgent appendectomy is feasible in children ; the intervention seems to be safe BACKGROUND The management of an appendiceal mass remains controversial with 2 schools of thought ; early surgical intervention vs nonoperative management with or without interval appendectomy . The aim is to determine the role and safety of early laparoscopic appendectomy ( LA ) in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass . METHODS This is a prospect i ve study of 88 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent attempted LA for suspected acute appendicitis at KK Women 's and Children 's Hospital , Singapore , between May and October 2003 . RESULTS A total of 88 patients with a mean age of 10 + /- 3 years ( range , 3 - 16 years ) underwent LA for an appendiceal mass ( n = 22 ) , simple appendicitis ( n = 36 ) , other complicated ( gangrenous or perforated ) appendicitis ( n = 23 ) , and a normal appendix ( n = 7 ) . There were 7 conversions to  open appendicectomy  , 3 of which occurred in patients with an appendiceal mass . There were no perioperative or postoperative mortalities . Morbidity occurred in only one patient who underwent LA for perforated appendicitis . He had prolonged sepsis that resolved after 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics . None of the patients with an appendiceal mass developed complications . Patients who underwent early LA for an appendiceal mass had a statistically significant ( P < .05 ) longer operating time ( median , 103 minutes ; interquartile range , 90 - 151 minutes , vs median , 87 minutes ; interquartile range , 71 - 112 minutes ) , prolonged time to ambulation ( median , 2.0 days ; interquartile range , 2 - 2.5 days , vs median , 1.0 days ; interquartile , 1 - 2 days ) , increased time to resumption of diet ( median , 4 days ; interquartile , 3 - 5 days , vs median , 2 days ; interquartile , 2 - 3 days ) , and longer postoperative stay ( median , 6.0 days ; interquartile , 5.5 - 6.5 days , vs median , 4.0 days ; interquartile , 3 - 5.5 days ) compared with patients presenting with appendicitis without mass formation . However , there was no statistical difference in these parameters when LA for an appendiceal mass was compared with LA for other complicated appendicitis ( perforated and gangrenous ) . CONCLUSION Although early LA for an appendiceal mass is a technically dem and ing procedure , it can be performed safely in children with minimal morbidity and mortality . In an era where patients ' dem and for " key-hole " surgery is rising , early LA is a safe and viable option in the management of children with an appendiceal mass . It also offers the advantage of avoiding misdiagnoses and the need for a second hospitalization OBJECTIVE Given the perceived technical dem and s of laparoscopic appendectomy and the expected postoperative morbidity in patients with a well-defined abscess , initial percutaneous drainage has become an attractive option in this patient population . This strategy allows for a laparoscopic appendectomy to be performed in an elective manner at the convenience of the surgeon . However , the medical burden on the patient and on the quality of patient outcomes has not been described in the literature . Therefore , we audited our experience with initial percutaneous drainage followed by laparoscopic interval appendectomy to evaluate the need for a prospect i ve trial . METHODS After institutional review board approval , a retrospective chart review was performed on all children who presented with perforated appendicitis and a well-defined abscess and were treated by initial percutaneous aspiration/drainage followed by interval appendectomy between January 2000 and September 2006 . Continuous variables are listed with st and ard deviation . RESULTS There were 52 patients with a mean age of 9.0 + /- 3.9 years and weight of 34.4 + /- 18.8 kg . The  mean duration of symptoms at presentation was 8.4 + /- 7.6 days . Percutaneous aspiration only was performed in 2 patients . The mean volume of fluid on initial aspiration/drain placement was 76.3 + /- 81.1 mL. The mean time to appendectomy was 61.9 + /- 25.2 days . The laparoscopic approach was used in 49 patients ( 94.2 % ) , of which one was converted to an open operation . The mean length of hospitalization after interval appendectomy was 1.4 + /- 1.4 days . A recurrent abscess developed in 17.3 % of the patients . Six patients ( 11.5 % ) required another drainage procedure . The mean total charge to the patients was $ 40,414.02 . There were 4 significant drain complications ( ileal perforation , colon perforation , bladder perforation , and buttock/thigh necrotizing abscess ) . The child with the ileal perforation after drain placement is the only patient who failed initial nonoperative therapy . CONCLUSIONS The use of initial percutaneous aspiration/drainage of periappendiceal abscess followed by interval appendectomy is an effective approach . However , this management poses complication risks and uses considerable re sources . Therefore , this strategy should be compared with early operation in a prospect i ve trial INTRODUCTION In a previous prospect i ve r and omized trial , we found a once-a-day regimen of ceftriaxone and metronidazole to be an efficient , cost-effective treatment for children with perforated appendicitis . In this study , we evaluated the safety of discharging patients to complete an oral course of antibiotics . METHODS Children found to have perforated appendicitis at the time of laparoscopic appendectomy were enrolled in the study . Perforation was defined as a hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen . Patients were r and omized to antibiotic treatment with either once daily dosing of ceftriaxone and metronidazole for a minimum of 5 days ( intravenous [ IV ] arm ) or discharge to home on oral amoxicillin/clavulanate when tolerating a regular diet ( IV/PO arm ) to complete 7 days . RESULTS One hundred two patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis . On presentation , there were no differences in age , weight , sex distribution , days of symptoms , maximum temperature , or leukocyte count between the 2 groups . There was no difference in the postoperative abscess rate between the two treatment groups . Discharge was possible before day 5 in 42 % of the patients in the IV/PO arm . CONCLUSIONS When patients are able to tolerate a regular diet , completing the course of antibiotics orally decreases hospitalization with no effect on the risk of postoperative abscess formation
Conclusion The paradigm remains unchanged , that appendectomy is the gold st and ard of treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis , given its higher efficacy rate when compared to NOM
Introduction Appendectomy has long been the mainstay of intervention for acute appendicitis , aim ing at preventing perforation , peritonitis , abscess formation and recurrence .
With better underst and ing of the disease process , non-operative management ( NOM ) with antibiotics alone has been proved a feasible treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis .
This article aim ed at systematic ally review ing the available literature s and discussing the question whether NOM should replace appendectomy as the st and ard first-line treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis .