Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years. Caries-Preventive Effect of a One-Time Application of Composite Resin and Glass Ionomer Sealants after 5 Years Do light cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants perform better than resin-composite sealants: a 4-year randomized clinical trial. Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years. Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial. In vitro evaluation of sealing pits and fissures with newer glass-ionomer cements developed for the ART technique. Effectiveness of a glass ionomer cement used as a pit and fissure sealant in recently erupted permanent first molars. Caries-preventive Effect of Supervised Toothbrushing and Sealants 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria. [Caries prevention effect of resin based sealants and glass ionomor sealants]. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. A three-year follow-up of glass ionomer cement and resin fissure sealants. Penetration of a light-cured glass ionomer and a resin sealant into occlusal fissures and etched enamel. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up. Clinical evaluation of three different materials used as pit and fissure sealant: 24-months results. Comparing the caries-preventive effect of two fissure sealing modalities in public health care: a single application of glass ionomer and a routine resin-based sealant programme. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to investigate the caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with a high-viscosity glass-ionomer with an elevated powder-liquid ratio ( ART ) , of having energy added to this glass-ionomer , and that of glass-carbomer , in comparison to that of resin composite sealants . METHODS The r and omized controlled trial covered 407 children , with a mean age of 8 years . At a school compound three dentists placed sealants in pits and fissures of high caries-risk children . Evaluation by two independent evaluators was conducted after 0.5 , 1 and 2 years . The Kaplan-Meier survival method , ANOVA and t-test were used in analyzing the data . RESULTS 1352 first permanent molars were sealed . 6.6 % of children and 6.8 % of sealants dropped out within 2 years . 27 re-exposed pits and fissures , 20 in occlusal and 7 in smooth surfaces , in 25 children , developed a dentin carious lesion . The cumulative survival of dentin carious lesion-free pits and fissures in the  glass-carbomer sealant group was statistically significantly lower ( 97.4 % ) than those in the high-viscosity glass-ionomer with energy supplied ( 99 % ) and the resin-composite ( 98.9 % ) sealant groups . There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative survival of dentin carious lesion-free pits and fissures , between the high-viscosity glass-ionomer with ( 99 % ) and without ( 98.3 % ) energy supplied sealant groups , after 2 years . SIGNIFICANCE The survival of dentin carious lesion-free pits and fissures was high in all sealant types . More dentin carious lesions were observed in the glass-carbomer sealant group The aim of the present trial was to ( 1 ) compare the caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer sealants , placed according to the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) procedure , with composite resin sealants over time and ( 2 ) investigate the caries-preventive effect after complete disappearance of sealant material . Forty-six boys and 57 girls , mean age 7.8 years , were r and omly divided into two treatment groups in a parallel-group study design . A light-polymerized composite resin sealant material and a high-viscosity glass ionomer were each placed in 180 fully erupted first molars in their respective treatment groups . Evaluation took place annually for 5 years by calibrated examiners . After 5 years , 86 % composite resin and 88 % glass ionomer sealants did not survive . Three categories of re-exposure periods for caries development in pits and fissures after complete loss of sealants were distinguished : 0–1 , 1–2 and 2–3 years . In the 2- to 3-year group , 13 and 3 % of pits and fissures previously sealed with composite resin and glass ionomer , respectively , were diagnosed as having developed a dentine lesion . The relative risks ( 95 % CI ) of dentine lesion development in surfaces sealed with glass ionomer compared to those sealed with composite resin after 3 , 4 and 5 years were 0.22 ( 0.06–0.82 ) , 0.32 ( 0.14–0.73 ) and 0.28 ( 0.13–0.61 ) , respectively . The relative risks of dentine lesion development in pits and fissures previously sealed with glass ionomer compared with composite resin over re-exposure periods of 1–2 and 2–3 years were 0.26 ( 0.14–0.48 ) and 0.25 ( 0.09–0.68 ) , respectively . We conclude that the caries-preventive effect of high-viscosity glass ionomer sealants , placed using the ART procedure , was between 3.1 and 4.5 times higher than that of composite resin sealants after 3–5 years . Furthermore , high-viscosity ( ART ) glass ionomer sealants appear to have a four times higher chance of preventing caries development in re-exposed pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces in first molars than light-cured composite resin sealant material over a 1- to 3-year period . A well- design ed clinical trial using different types of oral health personnel should be implemented to confirm these initial results OBJECTIVE The hypotheses tested were : the cumulative survival rates of dentin caries lesion-free pits and fissures of ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants with light-curing ( high-intensity LED ) and glass-carbomer sealants are higher than those of conventional ART sealants and resin-composite sealants after 4 years . METHODS The r and omized controlled clinical trial covered 405 children ( mean age 8-years ) . Three dentists placed sealants in pits and fissures of high caries-risk children . Evaluation by two independent evaluators was conducted after 0.5 , 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 years . The Kaplan-Meier survival method , ANOVA and t-test were used in data analyses . RESULTS 1304 first permanent molars were sealed . 12.3 % of children and 15.4 % of sealants dropped out . 46 re-exposed pits and fissures , 39 ( occlusal ) 7 ( free smooth surfaces ) , in 42 children developed a dentin carious lesion . The cumulative survival of dentin caries lesion-free occlusal pits and fissures in ART plus LED group ( 98 % ) was statistically significantly higher than in the resin-composite group ( 96.4 % ) and in the glass-carbomer group ( 94.5 % ) . The cumulative survival of dentin caries lesion-free occlusal pits and fissures in the glass-carbomer group was statistically significantly lower than that in the conventional ART group ( 97.3 % ) . For the free smooth surfaces , there was no statistically significantly difference among the four sealant groups . SIGNIFICANCE Light-cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants prevented the occurrence of dentin cavities best The hypotheses tested were : survival rate of fully and partially retained glass-carbomer sealants is higher than those of high-viscosity glass-ionomer , with and without energy supplied , and that of resin composite ; survival rate of fully and partially retained sealants of high-viscosity glass-ionomer with energy supplied is higher than those without energy supplied . The r and omized clinical trial covered 407 children , with a mean age of 8 years . The evaluation took place after 0.5 , 1 and 2 years . Survival of sealant material in occlusal and in smooth surfaces , using the traditional categorization ( fully and partially retained versus completely lost sealants ) and the modified categorization ( fully and more than 2/3 of the sealant retained versus completely lost sealants ) , were dependent variables . The Kaplan – Meier survival method was used . According to both categorizations of partially retained sealants , the survival of completely and partially retained resin composite sealants  in occlusal and in smooth tooth surfaces was statistically significantly higher , and those of glass-carbomer sealants lower , than those of sealants of the other three groups . There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates of completely and partially retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants with and without energy supplied in occlusal and in smooth surfaces . After 2 years , glass-carbomer sealant  retention was the poorest , adding energy to high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealant did not increase the retention rate and resin composite sealants were retained the longest . We suggest the use of the modified categorization of partially retained sealants in future studies . It seems not necessary to cure high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants . The use of glass-carbomer sealants can not be recommended yet PURPOSE To test the hypotheses : 1 ) cumulative survival rates of fully and partially retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ( HVGIC ) ART sealants with heat application and glass-carbomer sealants on occlusal and free-smooth surfaces are both higher than that of resin sealants ; 2 ) cumulative survival rate of fully and partially retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealant with heat application on occlusal and free-smooth surfaces is higher than that of comparable ART sealants without heat application . MATERIAL S AND METHODS The block-r and omised clinical trial covered 405 eight-year-old children . The HVGIC was Ketac Molar Easymix , the glass carbomer was GlassCarbomer and the resin sealant was Clinpro . Retention rates of sealants on occlusal and free-smooth surfaces using conventional and modified categorisation ( fully and partially retained sealants vs those completely lost [ at least one-third of surface re-exposed ] ) were the dependent variables . The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used . RESULTS The cumulative survival rate of completely and partially retained resin sealants  on occlusal ( 81.2 % ) and free-smooth ( 81 % ) surfaces after 4 years was statistically significantly higher , and that of glass-carbomer sealants ( 10.8 % and 21.1 % , respectively ) was statistically significantly lower than those of the other sealant groups . There was no statistically significant difference in survival rates of completely and partially retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants with ( 56 % for both surfaces ) or without heat application ( 56 % ) on occlusal and free-smooth surfaces ( 55.7 % and 59.1 % , respectively ) . CONCLUSIONS Resin sealants had the highest and glass-carbomer sealants the lowest retention rate after 4 years . Application of heat to high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants did not result in a significantly higher sealant retention rate . Use of the modified categorisation for determining sealant retention is advocated The aims of the present study were to evaluate the retention and caries-preventive effect of a single application of a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement ( Vitrebond ) in pits and fissures of newly erupted permanent first and second molars , when compared with a single application of a resin-based sealant ( Concise White Sealant ) during a 3-year period . The study group comprised 73 pairs of contralateral newly erupted permanent first and second molars ( 136 fissure sites ) in 53 children ( 29 girls , 24 boys ) . A split-mouth experimental design was used in which the two sealants were r and omly allocated to one of the teeth within each pair . Acid etching was not used before application of the glass-ionomer cement . The sealed teeth were checked for retention and caries after 1 , 6 , 12 , 24 and 36 months . The resin-based sealant was almost totally retained after 3 years ( 97 % ) and there was no caries in these teeth . The glass-ionomer cement was increasingly lost and could be observed in only 9 % of the sealed sites after 3 years . Carious lesions developed in 10 ( 7.4 % ) sites ( nine teeth , seven children ) . It was concluded that the resin-based sealant is superior to the glass-ionomer cement in preventing caries , and that the superior retention of the resin probably is an important factor for this In recent years , the interest in the use of glass-ionomer material s as fissure sealants has increased . The aim of this study was to compare the retention and caries-preventive effect of glass-ionomer ( Fuji III ) and resin-based light-cured ( Delton ) fissure sealants .  Three health center dentists applied the sealants to 166 children ; glass-ionomer sealants  on one side and resin-based sealants on the contralateral side of the mouth . After 2 yr , one pair of molar teeth in the mouths of 151 children was compared . Twenty-six percent of glass-ionomer and 82 % of resin-based sealants were totally present ( P < 0.001 ) . During the 2 yr , in both groups 4.6 % of the sealed surfaces became carious . The results show that the retention of glass-ionomer sealants  is markedly inferior to the resin-based sealants . In this study , however , no difference in caries increment on the sealed surfaces was observed . This may be due to the different mechanism of caries prevention for the sealant material s , or to the overall low caries activity of the participants Four conventional glass-ionomer cements specifically developed for use with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) technique were compared with a resin-based sealant for marginal and surface dye penetration , material voids , and completeness of enamel fissure penetration .  Thirty sound permanent m and ibular molar teeth were r and omly divided into five groups . After delayed placement of the glass-ionomer cement sealants using st and ardized finger pressure , and conventional placement of the resin-based sealant using a dental probe , the teeth were first thermocycled then the crowns immersed in methylene blue dye before being sectioned . There were no statistically significant differences found between any of the five material s , apart from less marginal dye leakage being present for the resin-based sealant than for one of the glass-ionomer cements . The cements , however , showed better fissure penetration than did the sealant . Despite the delayed placement and higher viscosity , all of the glass-ionomer cements showed satisfactory penetration of the enamel fissures and minimal marginal and surface dye penetration , and material voids , when placed using firm finger pressure . The cements could prove to be useful in the dental treatment of apprehensive children PURPOSE This study 's purpose was to evaluate the caries-preventive effect of a glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) used as an occlusal sealant on recently erupted permanent first molars . METHODS A double-blind , r and omized , controlled , clinical trial was undertaken that included 36 5- to 8-year-olds ( and 92 permanent first molars ) who were r and omly allocated to the test group ( GIC ) or the control group ( auto-polymerized resin-based sealant [ RBS ] )  . The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the number of new carious or filled occlusal surfaces in the 2 groups . RESULTS After 6 months , 1 occlusal surface in the test group and 2 occlusal surfaces in the control group showed carious lesions ( P=.15 ) . In the fifth year of follow-up , 2 occlusal surfaces in the test group and 7 occlusal surfaces in the control group were filled or carious ( P=.42 ) , and the mean number of sealed surfaces that became carious or filled was 0.2 ( 95 % confidence interval [CI]=0.02 - 0.70 ) for the GIC-sealed teeth and 0.6 ( 95 % CI=0.20 - 1.30 ) for the RBS-sealed teeth ( P=.30 ) . CONCLUSION High-viscosity glass ionomer cement can provide some level of protection against dental caries when used as a dental sealant in newly erupted permanent first molars To investigate the effectiveness of 3 caries-preventive measures on high– and low – caries risk occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars over 3 y. This cluster-r and omized controlled clinical trial covered 242 schoolchildren , 6 to 7 y old , from low socioeconomic areas . At baseline , caries risk was assessed at the tooth surface level , through a combination of ICDAS II ( International Caries Detection and Assessment System ) and fissure depth codes . High – caries risk occlusal surfaces were treated according to daily supervised toothbrushing ( STB ) at school and 2 sealants : composite resin ( CR ) and atraumatic restorative treatment – high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement ( ART-GIC ) . Low – caries risk occlusal surfaces received STB or no intervention . Evaluations were performed after 0.5 , 1 , 2 , and 3 y. A cavitated dentine carious lesion was considered a failure . Data were analyzed according to the proportional hazard rate regression model with frailty correction , Wald test , analysis of variance , and t test , according to the jackknife procedure for calculating st and ard errors . The cumulative survival rates of cavitated dentine carious lesion – free , high – caries risk occlusal surfaces were 95.6 % , 91.4 % , and 90.2 % for STB , CR , and ART-GIC , respectively , over 3 y , which were not statistically significantly different . For low – caries risk occlusal surfaces , no statistically significant difference was observed between the cumulative survival rate of the STB group ( 94.8 % ) and the no-intervention group ( 92.1 % ) over 3 y. There was neither a difference among STB , CR , and ART-GIC on school premises in preventing cavitated dentine carious lesions in high – caries risk occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars nor a difference between STB and no intervention for low – caries risk occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars over 3 The aim was to test the null-hypothesis that there is no difference in the cumulative survival rate of retained composite resin ( CR ) sealants and a high-viscosity glass-ionomer Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) sealant in first permanent molars calculated according to the traditional and the modified retention assessment criteria over a period of 3 years . This cluster-r and omized controlled clinical trial consisted of 123 schoolchildren , 6 - 7-years-old . At baseline , high-caries risk pits and fissures of fully erupted first permanent molars were treated with CR and ART sealants . Evaluations were performed after 0.5 , 1 , 2 and 3 years . Retention was scored for free-smooth surface and for each of three sections into which the occlusal surface had been divided . The modified criterion differed from the traditional in that it determined an occlusal sealant to be a failure when at least one section contained no visible sealant material . Data were analysed according to the PHREG model with frailty correction , Wald-test , ANOVA and t-test , using the Jackknife procedure . The cumulative survival rates for retained CR and ART sealants in free-smooth and occlusal surfaces for both criteria were not statistically significantly different over the 3 years . A higher percentage of retained CR sealants on occlusal surfaces was observed at longer evaluations . Cumulative survival rates were statistically significantly lower for the modified criterion in comparison to the traditional . The modified retention assessment criterion should be used in future sealant-retention studies OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of resin-based sealants and glass ionomer sealants on  caries prevention in the first permanent molars . METHODS A r and omized controlled , examiner-blinded , 2-year clinical trial with parallel groups was conducted . A total of 419 children ( 664 first molars ) who had at least one sound first permanent molar with deep fissures or fissures with signs of non-cavitated lesions were recruited . They were r and omly allocated into three groups . Helioseal F , a light-cured resin-based sealants was used in group R ( 136 children with 219 first molars ) . FUJI VII , a light-cured glass ionomer sealants was used in group G ( 130 children with 218 first molars ) and group N ( 153 children with 227 first molars ) was blank control . Follow-up examinations were conducted at 6 , 12 , and 24 month after sealing to examine the sealants retention and caries incidence . Chi-square test was used to compare the differences of caries incidence among the 3 groups . Generalized estimating equations ( GEE ) was used to analyze the effective factors of caries incidence . RESULTS During the 2-year follow-up period , 3.0 % ( 6/197 ) of the teeth in group R , 6.7 % ( 13/193 ) of the teeth in group G , and 14.7 % ( 29/197 ) of the teeth in group N were diagnosed as having developed a cavitated lesion . The difference in the incidence of caries among the three groups was significant(P < 0.05 ) . No significant difference in caries incidence was found between group R and group G ( P > 0.05 ) . The tooth-level preventive fractions were 79.6 % for resin-based sealants and 54.4 % for glass ionomer sealants , respectively . CONCLUSIONS Both resin-based sealants and glass ionomer sealants can effectively prevent the incidence of caries in the first permanent molars . The two sealants have similar caries prevention effect Sealing occlusal pits and fissures with resin-based sealants is a proven method of preventing occlusal caries . Retention of the sealant is very essential for its efficiency . This study evaluated the retention of glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant when compared to a self-cure resin-based sealant .  One hundred and seven children between the ages of 6 - 9 years , with all four newly erupted permanent first molars were selected . Two permanent first molars on one side of the mouth were sealed with Delton , a resin-based sealant , and the contralateral two permanent first molars were sealed with Fuji VII glass ionomer cement .  Evaluation of sealant retention was performed at regular intervals over 12 months , using Simonsen 's criteria . At the end of the study period , the retention of the resin sealant  was seen to be superior to that of the glass ionomer sealant Glass Carbomer is a new generation of restorative material developed from glass-ionomer cements with possibility of gradual mineralization into fluorapatite . The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the retention of Glass Carbomer fissure sealant  after 12 months , in comparison to a commonly used conventional resin-based sealant .  Forty-eight teeth in 24 patients [ mean ( SD ) = 8 ( 2.3 ) years ] with well-delineated fissure morphology were r and omly divided into two equal groups and sealed with Bis-GMA resin-based Helioseal F ( group A , Ivoclar Vivadent , Liechtenstein ) and Glass Carbomer ( group B , Glass Carbomer Sealant , Glass Carbomer Products , Leiden , Netherl and s ) using the split mouth design . Material s were placed and set according to the manufacturer 's instructions using a polymerization unit Bluephase 16i ( Vivadent , Liechtenstein ) . Complete sealant retentions in both groups were 100 % and 75 % after 6 and 12 months of clinical service , respectively . There were there were no secondary caries lesions in both groups after 6 months ; two new carious lesions were detected in both groups after 12 months . The Mann-Whitney U test revealed no significant difference between the two groups at both evaluations points ( P > 0.05 ) . Glass Carbomer material showed a similar retention rate when compared with a resin-based sealant . Future studies are required to examine the long-term performance of Glass Carbomer sealants PURPOSE To compare the h and ling and 6-month clinical performance of an experimental resin-modified glass ionomer cement ( K-512 = Fuji III LC ) with that of a light-cured resin-based sealant ( Delton Opaque ) when used as a pit and fissure sealant in 15 - 27 year old subjects . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Seventeen patients with 65 cement and 55 resin-based sealants  were recalled after 6 months for clinical examination and color photographs . RESULTS Sealant retention failures requiring retreatment were 74 % for the glass ionomer cement sealant and 11 % for the resin-based sealant , with one instance of fissure caries being found for each material . The resin-modified glass ionomer cement sealant showed a slight darkening from its initial placement , and was also more difficult to h and le than the resin-based sealant OBJECTIVE To compare the retention and the caries preventive effect of a glass-ionomer developed for fissure sealing ( Fuji III ) and a chemically polymerized resin-based fissure sealant ( Delton ) . DESIGN A split mouth r and omized design using contralateral teeth . SETTING WHO Regional Demonstration , Training and Research Center for Oral Health , Damascus , Syrian Arab Republic . SAMPLE AND METHODS 179 children , 7 years old at the start of the study , were recruited from schools close to the Center . Only children with at least one pair of permanent first molars that were caries free or only had incipient lesions were included in the study . Follow-up examinations for sealant retention were done after 6 months , 1 year , 2 years and 3 years . The number of children available for reexamination was 129 ( after 6 months ) ; 121 ( after 1 year ) ; 115 ( after 2 years ) and 116 ( after 3 years ) . Four dental hygienists were trained in the sealant procedures and did approximately one fourth of the sealants each . RESULTS After 3 years the  glass-ionomer sealant was completely lost in almost 90 % of the teeth compared to less than 10 % of the resin sealed teeth . After 3 years the relative risk of a tooth sealed with glass-ionomer over that of a tooth sealed with resin was 3.38 ( 95 % CL : 1.98 ; 5.79 ) . This finding was consistent over type of tooth . CONCLUSIONS The glass-ionomer sealant tested in the present study had poorer retention and less caries protective effect than the resin-based sealant used The aim of the present study was to compare intraindividually a type III fissure-sealant , glass ionomer cement with a resin-based sealant .  One hundred and forty-eight first permanent molars were sealed in forty-seven children . After three years 20.8 percent of the resin and 34.7 percent of the glass ionomer cement sealants were partially lost , and 0 percent and 37.5 percent , respectively , were totally lost . One tooth ( 1.4 percent ) in the glass ionomer cement group and three teeth ( 4.2 percent ) in the resin group developed caries PURPOSE To evaluate the penetration of a light-cured glass ionomer and a resin sealant into occlusal fissures and etched enamel . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Forty-eight maxillary and m and ibular caries-free premolars scheduled for extraction for orthodontic reasons were isolated , the occlusal surfaces subjected to prophylaxis and acid-etched with orthophosphoric acid prior to the application of the VariGlass VLC glass ionomer and Concise resin sealants . The teeth were extracted , two longitudinal median sectiors from each tooth were ground to a thickness of 80 - 100 microns , and the sealant penetration into the fissures evaluated . The sections were placed in nitric acid to dissolve the enamel so the lengths of the tags which had penetrated into the etched enamel could be measured at different sites on the walls of the fissures . RESULTS Both sealants adapted well to the fissures but penetrated deeper into shallow , open fissures than into deep , constricted fissures . The VariGlass VLC tags into etched enamel were generally longer than the Concise projections The aim of this study was to compare the retention and caries preventive efficacy of glass ionomer ( Fuji III ; GIC ) and light-cured resin-based ( Delton ; LCR ) fissure sealants .  One hundred and sixty-six 5 - 14-year-old schoolchildren received sealants on their newly erupted first or second molars ; a split mouth design was used . Previously reported 2-year results showed low retention rates for GIC sealants , but no difference in the caries increment between the groups . The same persons were invited to a dental check-up 6.1 to 7.8 ( mean 7.1 ) years after the application of sealants ;  111 persons ( 66.8 % of the original group ) participated in the study . The retention of sealants , and the caries status of occlusal surfaces and adjacent proximal surfaces was recorded . On the sealed occlusal surfaces , 10 % of GIC and 45 % of LCR sealants were totally and 9 % of GIC and 20 % of LCR sealants partially present . Twenty-three ( 23.5 % ) of the occlusal surfaces sealed with GIC and 16 ( 16.5 % ) of those sealed with LCR were carious or filled . Compared to LCR sealants , the effectiveness of GIC sealants  was -44 % ( 95 % CI -71 % , -16 % ) and net gain -7 % ( 95 % CI -18 % , 4 % ) . The relative risk of caries occurring was 1.44 ( 95 % CI 0.96 , 2.14 ) PURPOSE The aim of this work is to study and compare the retention rate , caries-preventing and antibacterial effects of resin-modified glass ionomer and flowable composite in comparison to conventional fissure sealant . METHODS Forty-five children aged 7 - 10 years with newly erupted lower first permanent molars were r and omly divided into three equal treatment groups . Group I : sealed by a conventional resin sealant ; Group II : sealed by resin modified glass ionomer ( RMGI ) ; and Group III : sealed by flowable composite .  Retention and caries status of the sealed teeth were recorded after 1 month , 6 months , year and 2 years . In addition , Streptococcus mutans counts were assessed at baseline , 1 day , 1 month , 6 months , 1 year and 2 years after sealant application . Data were analyzed by Fisher exact , chi-square and ANOVA tests . RESULTS Group III and Group I showed significantly higher retention rates than Group II fissure sealant ( p<0.05 ) . There were no differences of the caries-preventive effects between the tested sealant material s throughout the duration of the study . Streptococcus mutans counts were significantly lower in group II compared to group I or group III up to 6 months of the study ( p<0.05 ) . After 1 year of the study the differences of Streptococcus mutans counts were not significant ( p>0.05 ) . CONCLUSION This study indicated a lower retention of RMGI compared to flowable composite and resin sealant without significant difference in caries prevention or long-term bacterial inhibition OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical retention of a new resin-modified glass ionomer cement based adhesive combined with a hybrid resin composite or a poly-acid modified resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions during a 6-year period . METHODS The resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive ( Fuji Bond LC ) , was placed in 73 cervical lesions , 36 with a universal hybrid resin composite ( Tetric Ceram ) and 37 with a poly-acid modified resin composite ( Hytac ) . Fifty-one in lesions with sclerotic dentin and 22 in non-sclerotic ones . Of the sclerotic lesions 38 were slightly roughened with a diamond bur before conditioning . The restorations were evaluated with slightly modified USPHS criteria every six months during a 6-year period . RESULTS All except six restorations were evaluated during the 6 years . Twelve ( 17.9 % ) were lost , four Tetric Ceram ( 11.8 % ) and eight Hytac ( 24.2 % ) ( p<0.05 ) . Four were found in non-sclerotic lesions ( 20.0 % ) and eight in sclerotic lesions ( 17.0 % ) . The differences between the sclerotic and non-sclerotic and the roughened and non-roughened lesions were not significant . CONCLUSIONS The resin-modified glass adhesive showed a superior clinical retention combined with the resin composite material , with an annual failure rate of 2 % To evaluate the retention and caries experience effects of three different material s used as fissure sealants after 24 months of clinical application : a resin-modified glass ionomer cement ( A ) , a flowable resin composite ( B ) and a compomer ( C ) .  One hundred and seventeen ( 117 ) teeth were sealed with material A , 119 teeth with material B and 120 teeth with material C. Children were r and omly assigned . Each one received only one of the material s studied .  Plaque index , dmft score and socioeconomic level were scored at baseline . The clinical exams were conducted 6 , 12 and 24 months after application of the sealant . Statistical analysis ( Kruskal-Wallis ) revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the retention rates of groups A and B and between groups B and C after 2 years , with material B showing better results . After 2 years , 3.1 % of the teeth of group A , 4.3 % of group B and 6.7 % of group C were Carious+Filled . There was no evidence of association between caries presence after 2 years and plaque index , dmft score and socioeconomic level . These results suggest that flowable resin composite had a satisfactory retention after this period of evaluation and all three material s were effective on occlusal caries prevention AIM The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect of two types of sealant modalities and to evaluate whether the caries-preventive effect is related to sealant retention . A hypothesis was tested in which a glass ionomer sealant , once applied to the occlusal surface , was able to protect the fissure from caries even if the sealant appeared lost at visual inspection . DESIGN A 3-year r and omized split-mouth trial evaluating two sealant modalities was performed at a public health centre in Finl and . A chemically curing glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) and light-curing resin-based ( RB ) sealant material were applied r and omly to the permanent second molars . Sealant application as a routine treatment procedure was carried out to 599 children in the age group of 12 - 16 years .  Caries rate of the sealed teeth and sealant retention with both material s were analysed by a modified McNemar 's test . The effectiveness , rate difference , and relative risk with both sealant material s were measured . RESULTS The difference in caries rate between the two modalities was highly significant . When compared to the GIC sealant method , the effectiveness of  RB sealant method was 74.1 % and the rate difference 3.2 % ( 95 % CI 1.44 % , 4.98 % ) . The relative risk for RB-sealed surfaces vs. GIC-sealed surfaces of having detectable dentin caries was 0.26 ( 95 % CI 0.12 , 0.57 ) . The retention rate of sealants was higher with RB than GIC ( P < 0.001 ) . The effectiveness of the retention rate for RB sealants was 94.8 % and the rate difference 87.2 % ( 95 % CI 83.86 % , 90.50 % ) . The relative risk during the 3-year study period of having a defective or lost RB sealant  was 0.052 ( 95 % CI 0.036 , 0.075 ) when compared to having a defective or lost GIC sealant . CONCLUSION It is concluded that in preventing dentin caries a RB sealant programme including resealing when necessary was more effective than a single application of GIC . The original hypothesis was thus falsified
This study confirms the likelihood that remnants of high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealant material are retained and block the deeper parts of pits and fissures even after the sealant appears to have disappeared clinical ly , exercising their carious lesion preventive effect
OBJECTIVES Resin composite sealants are retained longer than low-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants .
Nevertheless , a systematic review showed that there is no evidence that resin composite sealants are superior to low-viscosity glass-ionomers in preventing dentine carious lesion development .
This case study aim ed to investigate reasons for this .