One-year follow-up of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment(ART) for dental caries in children undergoing oncohematological treatment: a pragmatic trial Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial. 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria. An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. Cost-effectiveness of ART restorations in elderly adults: a randomized clinical trial. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial Survival of ART and Amalgam Restorations in Permanent Teeth of Children after 6.3 Years Two-year survival of ART restorations placed in elderly patients: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Effectiveness of Three Minimal Intervention Approaches for Managing Dental Caries: Survival of Restorations after 2 Years A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Survival Rate of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Restorations Using a Glass Ionomer Bilayer Technique with a Nanofilled Coating: A Bi-center Randomized Clinical Trial. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year clinical study in Malawi--comparison of conventional amalgam and ART restorations. Provision of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children--a 30-month evaluation. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years. Bilayer technique and nano-filled coating increase success of approximal ART restorations: a randomized clinical trial. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars? The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations. Clinical Investigation of Two Glass–Ionomer Restoratives Used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Approach in China: Two–Years Results
Background The oral condition in children undergoing oncohematological treatment can have a negative impact on the course of disease . Little is known about survival of tooth restorations in these patients . The aim of this study was to evaluate the longevity of restorations and sealants performed by Atraumatic Restoration Treatment ( ART ) in patients undergoing oncohematological treatment . Methods ART single surface restorations and sealants were performed in the experimental group ( E ) , which comprised children ( 2–13 years old ) undergoing oncohematological treatment , and in the control group ( C ) , in which  patients did not undergo such treatment .  The same examiner evaluated the  ART  at 1 , 3 , 6 and 12 months after preparation , using the same criteria for restorations and sealants . ART was successful if the sealant or restoration did not need a repair in the follow-up assessment . Descriptive , bivariate and Cox ’s proportional hazard analyses were performed at a significance level of 5 % . Results The two groups , one including 24 children ( E ) and the other 14 children ( C ) , received 101 and 52 ART procedures , respectively . The success rates were 95.0 % ( E ) and 100 % ( C ) at 1 month ( P = 0.233 ) ; 81.2 % ( E ) and 92.3 % ( C ) at 3 months ( P = 0.009 ) ; 72.2 % ( E ) and 80.8 % ( C ) at 6 months ( P = 0.050 ) and 48.5 % ( E ) and 73.1 % ( C ) at 12 months ( P = 0.001 ) . The final Cox ’s regression model for occurrence of ART failure needing repair did not show differences between groups ( E : OR = 1.6 , 95 % CI 0.8–2.9 ) ; primary teeth had a shorter survival than permanent teeth ( OR = 2.1 , 95 % CI 1.2–3.7 ) . Conclusions Oncohematological treatment did not interfere with the longevity of  ART restorations and sealants , which suggests the potential use of this technique in children undergoing chemotherapy . Trial registration Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry ( REBEC ) RBR-2c3c52 . Registered 5 June 2014 . Clinical trials are normally performed with well-known br and s of glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) , but the cost of these material s is high for public healthcare in less-affluent communities . Given the need to research cheaper material s , it seems pertinent to investigate the retention rate of a low-cost GIC applied as atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) sealants in two centers in Brazil . Four hundred and thirty-seven 6-to-8-year-old schoolchildren were selected in two cities in Brazil . The children were r and omly divided into two groups , according to the tested GIC applied in the first permanent molars . The retention rate was evaluated after 3 , 6 and 12 months . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed . The variables were tested for association with sealant longevity , using logistic regression analyses ( α = 5 % ) . The retention rate of sealants after 12 months was 19.1 % . The high-cost GIC br and presented a 2-fold-more-likely-to-survive rate than the low-cost br and ( p < 0.001 ) . Significant difference was also found between the cities where the treatments were performed , in that Barueri presented a higher sealant survival rate than Recife ( p < 0.001 ) . The retention rate of a low-cost GIC sealant br and was markedly lower than that of a well-known GIC sealant br and The aim was to test the null-hypothesis that there is no difference in the cumulative survival rate of retained composite resin ( CR ) sealants and a high-viscosity glass-ionomer Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) sealant in first permanent molars calculated according to the traditional and the modified retention assessment criteria over a period of 3 years . This cluster-r and omized controlled clinical trial consisted of 123 schoolchildren , 6 - 7-years-old . At baseline , high-caries risk pits and fissures of fully erupted first permanent molars were treated with CR and ART sealants . Evaluations were performed after 0.5 , 1 , 2 and 3 years . Retention was scored for free-smooth surface and for each of three sections into which the occlusal surface had been divided . The modified criterion differed from the traditional in that it determined an occlusal sealant to be a failure when at least one section contained no visible sealant material . Data were analysed according to the PHREG model with frailty correction , Wald-test , ANOVA and t-test , using the Jackknife procedure . The cumulative survival rates for retained CR and ART sealants in free-smooth and occlusal surfaces for both criteria were not statistically significantly different over the 3 years . A higher percentage of retained CR sealants on occlusal surfaces was observed at longer evaluations . Cumulative survival rates were statistically significantly lower for the modified criterion in comparison to the traditional . The modified retention assessment criterion should be used in future sealant-retention studies Extraction is the most common dental treatment provided for people in rural and suburban areas in many less-industrialised countries . By comparison , restorative care is rarely provided . In order to improve such situations , a treatment technique has been developed based only on h and excavation of carious lesions and using glass-ionomer cement as a filling material and a sealant . This Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) technique follows the concept of minimal intervention and does not require electrically driven equipment . This paper reports on the longevity of fillings and sealants placed using the technique under field conditions in rural Thail and .  Dental caries was treated using the ART technique in one village , whilst the population in a second village received restorative care ( amalgam fillings ) through mobile dental units . A third village was the control . After one year , 79 per cent of single surface ART fillings and 55 per cent of ART fillings of greater than one surface placed in deciduous teeth were judged successful . The success rate of ART fillings  in the permanent dentition ( mainly single surface fillings ) was 93 per cent and the retention rate for sealants was 78 per cent . Children were pleased at having received treatment by this technique and showed little fear . The ART technique is a promising caries treatment procedure for use in rural and sub-urban areas in less-industrialised countries BACKGROUND As the world population ages , the requirement for cost-effective methods of treating chronic disease conditions increases . In terms of oral health , there is a rapidly increasing number of dentate elderly with a high burden of maintenance . Population surveys indicate that older individuals are keeping their teeth for longer and are a higher caries risk group . Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) could be suitable for patients in nursing homes or house-bound elderly , but very little research has been done on its use in adults . OBJECTIVES To compare the cost-effectiveness of ART  and a conventional technique ( CT )  for restoring carious lesions as part of a preventive and restorative programme for older adults . METHODS In this r and omized clinical trial , 82 patients with carious lesions were r and omly allocated to receive either ART or conventional restorations .  Treatment costs were measured based on treatment time , material s and labour . For the ART group , the cost of care provided by a dentist was also compared to the cost of having a hygienist to provide treatment . Effectiveness was measured using percentage of restorations that survived after a year . RESULTS Eighty-two patients received 260 restorations , that is , 128 ART and 132 conventional restorations . 91.1 % of the restorations were on one surface only . After a year , 252 restorations were assessed in 80 patients .  The average cost for ART and conventional restorations  was € 16.86 and € 28.71 respectively ; the restoration survival percentages were 91.1 % and 97.7 % , respectively . This result ed in a cost-effectiveness ratio of 0.18 ( ART ) and 0.29 ( CT ) . When the cost of a hygienist to provide ART was inserted in the analysis , the result ing ratio was 0.14 . CONCLUSIONS Atraumatic restorative treatment was found to be a more cost-effective alternative to treat older adults after 1 year , compared to conventional restorations , especially in out of surgery facilities and using alternative workforce such as hygienists . Atraumatic restorative treatment can be a useful tool to provide dental care for frail and fearful individuals who might not access dental treatment routinely The atraumatic restorative treatment technique ( ART ) is based on removing infected tooth material using only h and instruments and filling the subsequently cleaned cavity with adhesive material such as glass ionomer . As its name suggests , the ART technique should be atraumatic during treatment , as well as for the tooth itself as for the patient . It was primarily developed for treating people living in underserved areas of the world where re sources and facilities such as electricity and trained manpower are limited . Many studies have evaluated the ART technique and the results have supported its application . However , a very limited number of studies have compared ART with more conventional techniques . For that reason , a study was conducted in Pakistan , to compare the ART technique with another more conventional treatment technique . The results of this study show that the preparations with h and instruments result ed in smaller sized cavities and therefore may be less traumatic to the tooth . It was also associated with less pain reactions compared to the more conventional technique . Although preparations with h and instruments required more time , this did not seem to affect the survival of restorations . The survival of glass ionomer cement restorations  made with h and instruments was comparable with single surface amalgam restorations made with a more conventional technique . Recurrent caries was not associated with any glass ionomer cement restorations made with h and instruments . The retention rate of glass ionomer sealants was low , however one dentist had a sealant retention rate of 81.5 percent that suggests that this procedure can be performed satisfactorily in conjunction with a glass ionomer cement restoration . Operator variances did seem to affect the restorations . Survival of glass ionomer restorations  made with both h and and rotary instruments varied for different operators . Similarly , the retention of fissure sealant also varied amongst operators . Operator differences also influenced the extent of tooth substance lost due to cavity preparation . The ART technique is a feasible approach towards the treatment of dental caries especially of one-surface lesions for underserved population Background Clinical studies are being conducted in less strict conditions in order to establish an adequate scientific basis for decision making . The aim of this pragmatic r and omized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of single and multiple-surfaces restorations performed following the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) premises compared with Conventional Treatment ( CT ) using bulk fill composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth . Methods / design A total of 1,214 5-to-13 year-old children with at least one single or multiple-surface dentin caries lesion in primary or permanent molars will be selected in public schools of Barueri-SP , Brazil . The participants will be r and omly assigned into 2 groups : CT ( caries removal with bur and restoration performed with Scotchbond ™ Universal Adhesive system associated with Filtek Bulk Fill – 3 M/ESPE ) and ART ( Caries removal with h and instruments and restoration with high viscosity glass ionomer cement Ketac Molar Easy Mix – 3 M/ESPE ) . Ten untrained dentists will perform the treatment in in dental offices located at public schools . The restorations will be evaluated after 6 , 12 and 24 months by an independent trained and calibrated examiner . The restoration and tooth survival , the cost-effectiveness analysis between the two groups and the operators ’ preferences regarding the techniques will be also evaluated . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test will be applied for the restoration and tooth survival . All the average event rates in the two groups will be modelled and compared with a Cox proportional hazard shared frailty model since there is an operator-cluster effect . The significance level for all analyses will be 5 % . Discussion Our hypothesis is that despite similar expected effectiveness between ART using high viscosity GIC and conventional treatment using bulk fill composite resin when treating single or multiple-surface in posterior primary and permanent teeth , ART will present superior cost-effectiveness . The results of this trial will support decision-making by clinicians and policy makers . Trial registration NCT02568917 . Registered on May 10th 2015 The null hypothesis tested was that there is no difference in the survival percentages of all restorations placed through the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) approach , with high-viscosity glass ionomer , and those produced through the traditional approach , with amalgam ( TA ) , in the permanent dentitions of children after 6.3 years . Using a parallel group design , we r and omly assigned a total of 370 children , aged 6 to 9 years , to the ART group and 311 children , also aged 6 to 9 years , to the TA group . Eight dentists placed a total of 1117 single- and multiple-surface restorations . The cumulative survival percentages  for ART glass-ionomer restorations were statistically significantly higher than those of amalgam restorations at all time intervals except the first ( p ≤ 0.044 ) . After 6.3 years , the cumulative survival percentages of ART and amalgam restorations were 66.1 % ( SE = 3.1 % ) and 57.0 % ( SE = 3.3 % ) , respectively . We concluded that the restorations produced with the ART approach , with high-viscosity glass ionomer , survived longer than those produced with the traditional approach , with amalgam , in the permanent teeth of young children OBJECTIVES Older dentate adults are a high caries risk group who could potentially benefit from the use of the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) . This study aim ed to compare the survival of ART and a conventional restorative technique ( CT ) using rotary instruments and a resin-modified glass-ionomer for restoring carious lesions as part of a preventive and restorative programme for older adults after 2 years . METHODS In this r and omised controlled clinical trial , 99 independently living adults ( 65 - 90 years ) with carious lesions were r and omly allocated to receive either ART or conventional restorations . The survival of restorations was assessed by an independent and blinded examiner 6 months , 1 year and 2 years after restoration placement . RESULTS Ninety-six ( 67.6 % ) and 121 ( 76.6 % ) restorations were assessed in the ART and CT groups , respectively , after 2 years . The cumulative restoration survival percentages after 2 years were 85.4 % in the ART and 90.9 % in the CT group . No statistically significant between group differences were detected ( p=0.2050 , logistic regression analysis ) . CONCLUSIONS In terms of restoration survival , ART was as effective as a conventional restorative approach to treat older adults after 2 years . This technique could be a useful tool to provide dental care for older adults particularly in the non- clinical setting . ( TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER IS RCT N 76299321 ) . CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The results of this study show that ART presented survival rates similar to conventional restorations in older adults . ART appears to be a cost-effective way to provide dental care to elderly patients , particularly in out of surgery facilities , such as nursing homes The present study was aim ed at comparing the effectiveness of three minimally invasive restorative treatment approaches for dentinal lesions in occlusal surfaces . The approaches tested comprised a conventional and a modified – conventional treatment and a modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) . The conventional approach was performed in a university dental clinic whilst the modified – conventional , employing portable equipment , and the modified ART , using h and instruments and a caries removal solution ( Caridex ® ) , were carried out in the field . Using the split – mouth design , 430 matched contralateral pairs of occlusal cavities were restored with amalgam or glass – ionomers in permanent molars of 152 school children by one dental therapist . The restorations were assessed using a modified USPHS – Ryge criteria . After 2 years , the cumulative survival percentages for occlusal amalgam and glass – ionomer restorations were 92 and 96 % , respectively . The survival of all restorations in the conventional , modified – conventional and the modified ART group was 96 , 96 and 91 % , respectively . The survival of occlusal amalgam and glass – ionomer restorations per treatment group was as follows : 94 and 99 % , respectively ( conventional group ) ; 95 and 97 % , respectively ( modified – conventional group ) , and 89 and 93 % , respectively ( modified ART group ) . The differences in survival percentage between restorations with amalgam and glass – ionomer , and between the three restorative treatment approaches were not statistically significant . In countries facing scarcity in re sources for dental care , ART seems a promising restorative approach to occlusal caries in posterior teeth . However , a longer clinical observation period is required to substantiate this initial conclusion The purpose of the study was to evaluate , in a clinical study over 2 years , the deterioration of two glass ionomer cements used with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) technique or approach . Fifty-five Fuji IX and 45 ChemFil Superior restorations were placed r and omly in 23 adult patients , mainly in small occlusal preparations in molar teeth . The restorations were placed in a dental hospital by one dentist using the ART technique . Photographs , radiographs and replicas were obtained at baseline and subsequent recalls . Both cements were easy to mix and place , but the radiolucency of ChemFil Superior was a disadvantage . Both cements also showed early high losses of sealant and restorative material . After 2 years , 34.5 % of the sealants appeared to be completely lost , with caries recorded in 5.3 % of the exposed fissures . In some instances , these small lesions may have been present , but not detected clinical ly , at the time of sealing . Restoration failures of 7.0 % were from wear and fracture of the cements and recurrent caries . Mean cumulative wear was 83.1 microm for Fuji IX and 104.0 microm for ChemFil Superior , which was not statistically significant . The cements became darker after their placement to more closely match the restored teeth , but there were few exact matches . There was no surface staining and only minor marginal discrepancies and staining associated with the restorations . Although the short-term clinical performance of the two glass ionomer cements was reasonable , the material s require further improvements in their mechanical properties , to reduce sealant losses and wear . The cements evaluated appear suitable for restricted use only , in posterior teeth Objectives The aims of this study were to compare 2-year cumulative survival rates of  amalgam and atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations in primary molars and to investigate the determinants of the survival rate of restorations . Material s and methods A controlled clinical trial using a parallel group design was carried out on 258 children aged 6–7 years old , allocated to two treatment groups : conventional restorative treatment using amalgam and ART using high-viscosity glass ionomer . A total of 364 amalgam restorations and 386 ART restorations were placed by three pedodontists in 126 and 158 children , respectively , and were evaluated after 0.5 , 1 , and 2 years . Restorations were placed in vital primary molars with neither pain nor signs of pulp involvement . The survival analysis was conducted using the proportional hazard rate regression model with frailty correction . Results The 2-year cumulative survival rates for all amalgam ( 77.3 % ) and ART ( 73.5 % ) restorations were not statistically significantly different , but there was an effect of “ type of surface ” ( single/multiple ) and “ cavity filling time ” on the survival rates . Both amalgam and ART single-surface restorations had higher survival rates than multiple-surface restorations of the same material . Secondary caries was responsible for 36 and 38 % of failures in amalgam and ART restorations , respectively . Mean time for restoring all type of cavities with amalgam and ART restorations was 13.6 and 13.7 min , respectively . Conclusions Amalgam and ART restorations presented similar survival rates over a 2-year period for all , single-surface , and multiple-surface restorations . Clinical relevance In the cause of finding alternatives to amalgam , ART restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomer might be a suitable option for managing cavitated dentine carious lesions in vital primary molars In this study , 1,325 school children from 7 farm schools were examined . Their mean age ( + /- SD ) was 10.5 + /- 3.0 ( range 6 - 11 ) years . At baseline , the mean DMFT score was 1.1 + /- 1.7 and 36.4 % of the children had caries . The prevalence of fluorosis among the children was 12.6 % . Curative treatment was offered to all the children . A total of 113 children ( 8.5 % ) with one-surface cavities on permanent teeth and without fluorosis were treated using the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach . A total number of 163 cavities were included in the study , of which 82 were treated with Fuji IX glass-ionomer cement and 81 with Ketac-MOLAR ( h and mix ) . One year after treatment , restoration and sealant parts of ART fillings were examined . Caries status was also determined . The placing of the ART fillings and their evaluation were performed by different practitioners . A total number of 108 restorations  ( 58 with Fuji IX , 50 with Ketac-MOLAR ) were evaluated . Results of ART fillings showed a survival rate of 93.1 % with Fuji and 94.0 % with Ketac-MOLAR .  Retention of the sealant parts of ART fillings  was observed in 81 % of restorations with Fuji IX and 76 % with Ketac-MOLAR , not connected to the filled cavity . Caries was absent on all teeth restored with Fuji IX and noted in only one tooth restored with Ketac-MOLAR , not connected to the filled cavity . The retention rate after a 12-month period was acceptable and ART approach proved to be an appropriate technique for restoring teeth in this population group . There were no statistically significant differences between the survival rates of the two glass-ionomer restorative material s ( P > 0.05 ) OBJECTIVE To compare the survival of  glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach with h and instruments , and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments . METHOD AND MATERIAL S Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs ( Fuji IX GP , Ketac-Molar Aplicap ) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy ( GK-amalgam ) was placed in 32 Class I preparations , in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 + /- 1.24 ( SD ) years . Thus , 9 treatment groups were formed . RESULTS After two years , there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups ( p = 0.99 ) . However , two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals ( p < 0.001 ) . Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material . CONCLUSIONS In a clinic setting , both the ART h and instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival , but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable PURPOSE The high-viscosity consistency of glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) contributes to its inappropriate adaptation , while the material 's premature exposure to humidity decreases its mechanical properties . This study 's purpose s were to : ( 1 ) investigate approximal atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations ' survival in primary molars using two different insertion techniques and two surface protection material s ; and ( 2 ) compare the results of cities where treatments were performed . METHODS A total of 389 six- to seven-year-olds were selected from two cities in Brazil and r and omly assigned into four groups : ( 1 ) ART restorations plus petroleum jelly ( PJ ) ; ( 2 ) bilayer-ART restorations plus PJ ; ( 3 ) ART restorations plus nanofilled coating for GIC ( NC ) ; ( 4 ) bilayer-ART restorations plus NC . Restorations were evaluated after one , six , 12 , 18 , and 24 months . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis , log-rank test , and Cox regression analysis were performed . RESULTS Restorations ' cumulative survival was 46.4 percent . There was a higher survival of bilayer-ART restorations ( P=0.03 ) . No difference was observed between surface protection material s ( P=0.57 ) . Restorations made in Barueri were almost 2.5-fold more likely to survive than those from Recife ( P<0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS The bilayer technique improves approximal ART restorations ' survival in primary molars . The nanofilled coating does not influence restorations ' survival rate , and the city where treatments were performed influences restoration survival OBJECTIVES The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) approach was compared with the traditional amalgam ( TA ) approach in order to test their appropriateness to complement a preventive and educational school oral health programme in Syria . METHODS Using a parallel group design , 370 and 311 grade 2 children were r and omly assigned to the ART and the TA group respectively . Eight dentists placed 1117  single- and multiple-surface restorations .  A modified actuarial method was used to estimate survival curves . The jackknife method was applied to calculate the st and ard error in the cumulative survival percentages . RESULTS A statistically significant difference in cumulative survival percentages between single-surface non-occlusal ART and comparable amalgam restorations was observed after 4.3 , 5.3 and 6.3 years . The survival of single-surface non-occlusal  ART  posterior restorations ( 80.2 + /- 4.9 % ) was statistically significantly higher than that of occlusal posterior ART restorations ( 64.8 + /- 3.9 % ) at evaluation year 6.3 . There was no statistically significant difference observed between survival percentages of large ( 55.8 + /- 10 % ) and that of small ( 69.2 + /- 4.6 % ) single-surface posterior ART restorations after 6.3 years . There was an operator effect observed for single-surface ART and comparable amalgam restorations . Secondary caries was observed in 2.3 % of single-surface ART restorations and in 3.7 % of single-surface amalgam restorations during the 6.3 year observation period . CONCLUSIONS The ART approach provided higher survival percentages for single-surface restorations than the TA approach over 6.3 years and is therefore appropriate for use in school oral health programmes . Secondary caries was only a minor reason for ART restorations to fail . An operator effect was observed for both treatment approaches OBJECTIVE This study compares the quality of class I restorations  made with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) technique and conventional class I amalgam restorations . METHODS The study was carried out among secondary school students in Mzuzu , Malawi . First-year students in 1987 who needed at least two class I restorations were selected . Based on a split-mouth design , each participant received both ART and conventional restorations . The 89 pairs of class I cavities were divided r and omly into two groups , since two different cermet ionomer cement ( CIC ) filling material s were used . Impressions of the restorations and subsequent models were made shortly after restoration , after six months , one year , two years , and three years . The quality of the restorations was determined on the models following the US Public Health Service criteria . Bulk fracture , contour , marginal integrity , and surface texture of the restorations were recorded and evaluated separately . Survival rates were determined by the result ant score of all criteria . RESULTS Though conventional amalgam restorations performed better on all criteria , this difference was significant only for the contour criterion . The survival rates of ART restorations after three years ( 81.0 % ) were lower than those of amalgam restorations ( 90.4 % ) ( P=.067 ) . CONCLUSIONS The quality of ART class I restorations is competitive with that of conventional amalgam restorations OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were : to provide restorations using the ART approach to pre-school children in Southern China in a kindergarten environment , using a high-strength glass-ionomer restorative material ; to assess the acceptability of this approach and to evaluate on a longitudinal basis the restorations placed . SAMPLE AND METHODS A total of 170 ART restorations were placed in 95 children , aged 5.1 + /- 0.7 years , by seven final-year dental students using st and ard ART procedures and h and instruments . The restorations were evaluated every six months thereafter by two calibrated independent examiners using explorers and mouth-mirrors . RESULTS 93 % of the children reported that they did not feel pain during treatment and 86 % were willing to receive ART restorations again . The cumulative 12- and 30-month survival rates of Class I restorations were 91 % and 79 % , respectively . The corresponding figures for Class V restorations were 79 % and 70 % , while those for Class II restorations were 75 % and 51 % . The failure rates of Class III and IV restorations were high with more than half of them scored as missing within the first year . CONCLUSIONS The ART approach was shown to be acceptable to Chinese pre-school children for providing restorative dental care outside the traditional clinical setting . The success rates were high for Class I and V restorations in primary teeth , modest for Class II , and low for Class III and IV restorations OBJECTIVE To compare survival rates of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) restorations placed with and without conditioners in occlusal cariouspermanent teeth after two years . MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was an experimental study among children , mean age 13.1 + /- 3.0 years . Two types of ART restorations  were r and omly placed on 186 occlusal carious permanent teeth on contralateral sides using split mouth design . Ethical clearance to conduct the study was obtained from the UI/UCH Review Committee . ART was performed using GC Fuji IX GP and teeth that were conditioned with GC Dentine Conditioner .  Time taken to place restorations and average material cost were recorded . Follow-up of subjects to evaluate integrity of restorations was conducted at 6 monthly intervals by one independent examiner . Proportions and percentages were generated ; student t-test was used to compare means . Cumulative survival rates were determined by the coded scores and st and ard criteria for evaluating ART restorations . RESULTS There was no significant difference in the mean time for placing ART restorations  with or without conditioners and in the cumulative survival rates of both treatment types after 2 years ( p > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION ART restorations placed without tooth conditioners can achieve similar result as those placed with conditioners BACKGROUND The high-viscosity consistency of glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) may lead to its incorrect adaptation into the cavity and therefore to restoration failure . AIM To compare two different insertion techniques for GIC in approximal atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and two different surface protection material s. DESIGN Approximal caries lesion in primary molars from 208 schoolchildren was r and omly assigned into four groups : G1 , conventional GIC insertion protected with petroleum jelly ( PJ ) ; G2 , bilayer technique protected with PJ ; G3 conventional GIC insertion protected with nano-filled particles coating for GIC ( NPC ) ; G4 , bilayer technique protected with NPC . Restorations were evaluated after 1 , 6 , 12 , 18 , 24 , and 36 months . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed . Cox regression analysis ( α = 5 % ) was used to verify the influence of clinical factors . RESULTS Restoration survival was 52.8 % . Log-rank test indicated a better survival of the bilayer technique restorations , compared to conventional restorations ( P = 0.005 ) , whereas the coated conventional restorations presented higher survival than the uncoated ones ( P = 0.035 ) . Cox regression analysis showed no influence of any clinical tested variables . CONCLUSION The survival rate of the approximal ART restorations is positively influenced by the bilayer technique , and the application of nano-filled coating increases the longevity of the conventional approximal ART restorations OBJECTIVES To assess and compare the cumulative survival rate of amalgam and atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations in primary molars over 3 years . METHODS 280 children aged 6 - 7 years old were enrolled in a cluster r and omized controlled clinical trial using a parallel group design covering two treatment groups : conventional restorative treatment with amalgam ( CRT ) and atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) using a high-viscosity glass-ionomer ( HVGIC ) Ketac Molar Easymix . Three pedodontists placed 750 restorations ( 364 amalgam and 386 ART in 126 and 154 children , respectively ) which were evaluated at 0.5 , 1 , 2 and 3 years . The proportional hazard rate regression model with frailty correction , ANOVA and Wald tests , and the Jackknife procedure were applied in analysing the data . RESULTS The cumulative survival rates over 3 years for all , single- and multiple-surface CRT/amalgam restorations ( 72.6 % , 93.4 % , 64.7 % , respectively ) were no different from those of comparable ART/HVGIC restorations ( 66.8 % ; 90.1 % and 56.4 % , respectively ) ( p=0.10 ) . Single-surface restorations had higher survival rates than multiple-surface restorations for the both treatment procedures ( p<0.0001 ) . A higher proportion of restorations failed because of mechanical reasons ( 94.8 % ) than of secondary caries ( 5.2 % ) . No difference in reasons for restoration failures between all types of amalgam and ART/HVGIC restorations were observed ( p=0.24 ) . SIGNIFICANCE The high-viscosity glass-ionomer used in this study in conjunction with the ART is a viable option for restoring carious dentin lesions in single surfaces in vital primary molars BACKGROUND Laboratory studies show diverse behaviour of different br and s of glass-ionomer cements  ( GIC ) . AIM This study investigated the clinical performance [ survival rate ( SR ) ] of three GIC br and s applied to proximal atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations . Additionally , the SR of the tooth was evaluated . DESIGN Proximal cavities of 262 primary molars were restored . The patients had been r and omly allocated to two operators and three GIC br and s :  Fuji IX , Hi-Dense , and Maxxion R. Restorations were evaluated after 1 , 6 , 12 , 18 , 24 , 30 , and 36 months . Failed restorations were , if possible , repaired or replaced . Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of GIC br and , operator , and surface of restoration . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed for both restoration survival and tooth survival ( α = 5 % ) . RESULTS After 3 years , 82.4 % of the restorations were evaluated . The SR of the restorations was 24.4 % , and there was no difference among GIC br and s ( log-rank test , P = 0.6 ) . In the first 18 months , a significant operator effect and significantly higher failures in distal surfaces were found . The SR of the tooth was 81.7 % . CONCLUSIONS The SR of proximal ART restorations was relatively low when compared with the SR of the tooth . There are no differences in the performance among the GIC br and s used in the study Objective : To compare the clinical performance of two glass – ionomer cements , ChemFlex ( Dentsply DeTrey ) and Fuji IX GP ( GC ) , when used with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach in China . Methods : Eighty – nine school children aged between 6 and 14 years who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior teeth were included . A split – mouth design was used in which the two material s were r and omly placed on contralateral sides . The performance of the restorations was assessed directly and also indirectly from die – stone replicas at baseline and after 6 , 12 , and 24 months . Results : The 24–month cumulative survival rates of ART restorations  in the primary teeth were 93 and 90 % for the ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP class I restorations , respectively , while 40 and 46 % of class II restorations placed with the respective material s were satisfactory . In the permanent dentition , only class I restorations were involved and the cumulative survival rates were 95 and 96 % for ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP . For the primary teeth after 24 months , net mean occlusal wear was 87 µm for ChemFlex and 85 µm for Fuji IX GP . The occlusal wear in the permanent teeth was 75 µm for ChemFlex and 79 µm for Fuji IX GP . Conclusion : The clinical performance of both material s over a 24–month period was similar and the survival rates of class I ART restorations  in both primary and permanent teeth were high
Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .