The effectiveness of yoga to prevent diabetes mellitus type 2 Creation of a database to assess effects of omega-3, omega-6 and total polyunsaturated fats on health: methodology for a set of systematic reviews Associations of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplement Use With Cardiovascular Disease Risks Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes. Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in depression in adults: a systematic review protocol Seeing the forests and the trees—innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: a protocol Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity among adults Comparative Effectiveness of Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Mixed Treatment Comparison The Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions as Adjuncts to Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review Protocol The effect of omega-3 on the serum visfatin concentration in patients with type II diabetes The effectiveness of group medical visits on diabetes mellitus type 2 (dm2) specific outcomes in adults: a systematic review A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Determine the Impact of Digestion Resistant Starch MSPrebiotic® on Glucose, Insulin, and Insulin Resistance in Elderly and Mid-Age Adults Calcium-vitamin D cosupplementation influences circulating inflammatory biomarkers and adipocytokines in vitamin D-insufficient diabetics: a randomized controlled clinical trial. High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation in People With Prediabetes and Hypovitaminosis D Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future A systematic review protocol examining the effect of vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function The efficacy of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on plasma homocysteine and malondialdehyde levels of type 2 diabetic patients. Determinants of weight loss maintenance: a systematic review. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to control cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Asia: protocol for a systematic review Examining the theory‐effectiveness hypothesis: A systematic review of systematic reviews How to write an evidence-based clinical review article. The impact of cash transfers on social determinants of health and health inequalities in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol
Background : Type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) is becoming a leading problem worldwide . Emerging reports reveal alarming evidence of increasing prevalence of T2DM that has reached p and emic levels . Despite the significant incidence , there are limited reliable data re sources and comprehensive systematic review and meta- analysis on the effects of yoga on people who are a prediabetic or high risk for developing T2DM . Objective : The objective of this protocol is to conduct a full-scale systematic review and meta-analyses on the effects of yoga on people who are prediabetes or high risk of developing T2DM . Methods : The articles enrolled in the study will be retrieved from the online data bases between 2002 and the date the search es are executed . The search es will be repeated just before the final analyses and further relevant studies for inclusion . We will conduct a bibliographic search in data bases : Medline / PubMed , Scopus , Cochrane Library , EBSCO , and IndMED using keywords including prediabetes state , high risk for diabetes , metabolic syndrome , and yoga . A defined search strategy will be implemented along with selection criteria to obtain full-text articles of relevant studies . This study protocol was prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta- Analysis for Protocol s 2015 guidelines . There will be no language restrictions . Ethics and dissemination : The proposed study will be based on published studies and publicly available anonymized data without directly involving human participants and therefore requires neither formal human ethical review nor approval by a human research ethics committee . We published an outline of the protocol in the International Prospect i ve Register of Systematic Review s ( PROSPERO ) in 2018 . We plan to disseminate the findings of this systematic review and meta- analysis through publication in a peer- review ed journal and presentation at relevant conference proceedings . In addition , we believe the results of the systematic review will have implication s for policy and practice . We will prepare policymaker summary using a vali date d format , disseminate through social media and email discussion groups . Review registration number : PROSPERO registration number CRD Objective To create a data base of long-term r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) comparing higher with lower omega-3 , omega-6 or total polyunsaturated fatty acid ( PUFA ) , regardless of reported outcomes , and to develop methods to assess effects of increasing omega-6 , alpha-linolenic acid ( ALA ) , long-chain omega-3 ( LCn3 ) and total PUFA on health outcomes . Design Systematic review search , methodology and meta-analyses . Data sources Medline , Embase , CENTRAL , WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform , Clinical trials.gov and trials in relevant systematic review s. Eligibility criteria RCTs of ≥24 weeks ' duration assessing effects of increasing ALA , LCn3 , omega-6 or total PUFAs , regardless of outcomes reported . Data synthesis Methods included r and om-effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses . Funnel plots were examined , and subgrouping assessed effects of intervention type , replacement , baseline diabetes risk and use of diabetic medications , trial duration and dose . Quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment , Development and Evaluation ( GRADE ) . Results Electronic search es generated 37 810 hits , de-duplicated to 19 772 titles and abstract s. We assessed 2155 full-text papers , conference abstract s and trials registry entries independently in duplicate . Included studies were grouped into 363 RCTs comparing higher with lower omega-3 , omega-6 and /or total PUFA intake of at least 6 months ’ duration —the Data base . Of these 363 included RCTs , 216 RCTs were included in at least one of our review s of health outcomes , data extracted and risk of bias assessed in duplicate . Ninety five RCTs were included in the Data base but not included in our current review s. Of these 311 completed trials , 27 altered ALA intake , 221 altered LCn3 intake and 16 trials altered omega-3 intake without specifying whether ALA or LCn3 . Forty one trials altered omega-6 and 59 total PUFA.The remaining 52 trials are ongoing though 13 ( 25 % ) appear to be outst and ing , or constitute missing data . Conclusions This extensive data base of trials is available to allow assessment of further health outcomes Importance Current guidelines advocate the use of marine-derived omega-3 fatty acids supplements for the prevention of coronary heart disease and major vascular events  in people with prior coronary heart disease , but large trials of omega-3 fatty acids have produced conflicting results . Objective To conduct a meta- analysis of all large trials assessing the associations of omega-3 fatty acid supplements with the risk of  fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease and major vascular events in the full study population and prespecified subgroups . Data Sources and Study Selection This meta- analysis included r and omized trials that involved at least 500 participants and a treatment duration of at least 1 year and that assessed associations of omega-3 fatty acids with the risk of vascular events . Data Extraction and Synthesis Aggregated study -level data were obtained from 10 large r and omized clinical trials . Rate ratios for each trial were synthesized using observed minus expected statistics and variances . Summary rate ratios were estimated by a fixed-effects meta- analysis using 95 % confidence intervals for major diseases and 99 % confidence intervals for all subgroups . Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes included fatal coronary heart disease , nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion , stroke , major vascular events , and all-cause mortality , as well as major vascular events in study population subgroups . Results Of the 77 917 high-risk individuals participating in the 10 trials , 47 803 ( 61.4 % ) were men , and the mean age at entry was 64.0 years ; the trials lasted a mean of 4.4 years . The associations of treatment with outcomes were assessed on 6273 coronary heart disease events ( 2695 coronary heart disease deaths and 2276 nonfatal myocardial infa rct ions ) and 12 001 major vascular events . R and omization to omega-3 fatty acid supplementation ( eicosapentaenoic acid dose range , 226 - 1800 mg/d ) had no significant associations with coronary heart disease death ( rate ratio [ RR ] , 0.93 ; 99 % CI , 0.83 - 1.03 ; P = .05 ) , nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion ( RR , 0.97 ; 99 % CI , 0.87 - 1.08 ; P = .43 ) or any coronary heart disease events ( RR , 0.96 ; 95 % CI , 0.90 - 1.01 ; P = .12 ) . Neither did r and omization to omega-3 fatty acid supplementation have any significant associations with major vascular events ( RR , 0.97 ; 95 % CI , 0.93 - 1.01 ; P = .10 ) , overall or in any subgroups , including subgroups composed of persons with prior coronary heart disease , diabetes , lipid levels greater than a given cutoff level , or statin use . Conclusions and Relevance This meta- analysis demonstrated that omega-3 fatty acids had no significant association with fatal or nonfatal coronary heart disease or any major vascular events . It provides no support for current recommendations for the use of such supplements in people with a history of coronary heart disease AIMS To analyse the effect on systematic review s in diabetes interventions of including only trials that are indexed in medline , and to assess the impact of adding trials from other data bases and the grey literature . METHODS All systematic review s of diabetes interventions which included a meta- analysis of r and omized controlled trials , and were published since 1996 , were selected . The impact on the meta- analysis of including only those trials indexed in medline , and the effect of then adding trials from other sources , was assessed . Where possible this was measured quantitatively , by redoing the meta- analysis , otherwise a qualitative estimate was made . RESULTS Forty-four systematic review s met our inclusion criteria . There were 120 articles reporting trial data which were not indexed in medline . These came from 52 % of the review s. In 34 % of the review s , basing a meta- analysis on a search of only medline would miss trials that could affect the result . Sources of non- medline data which had the biggest effect on the meta-analyses were journal articles from central and embase ( mainly in Diabetes , Nutrition and Metabolism ) and unpublished data ( mainly from industry ) . The exceptions were journal articles on herbal medicine , mostly indexed in Chinese language data bases . CONCLUSIONS A search of only the medline data base is insufficient for systematic review s of diabetes , because in about 34 % of review s the missed trials could affect the results of the meta- analysis . It is recommended that central ( on the Cochrane Library ) also be search ed . Scanning meeting abstract s , and seeking unpublished data are also recommended if the intervention has only recently been introduced Background The role of vitamin D in management of depression is unclear . Results from observational and emerging r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) investigating the efficacy of vitamin D in depression lack consistency - with some suggesting a positive association while others show a negative or inconclusive association . Methods / Design The primary aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of RCTs to assess the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on depression symptoms measured by scales and the proportion of patients with symptomatic improvement according to the authors ’ original definition . Secondary aims include assessing the change in quality of life , adverse events and treatment discontinuation . We will conduct the systematic review and meta- analysis according to the recommendations of the Cochrane H and book for Systematic Review s of Interventions . We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL ) , MEDLINE ( 1966 to present ) , EMBASE ( 1980 to present ) , CINAHL ( 1982 to present ) , PsychINFO ( 1967 to present ) and Clinical Trials.gov . Unpublished work will be identified by search ing two major conferences : the International Vitamin Conference , the Anxiety Disorders and Depression Conference , while grey literature will be acquired by contacting authors of included studies . We will use the r and om-effects meta- analysis to synthesize the data by pooling the results of included studies . Discussion The results of this systematic review will be helpful in clarifying the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation and providing evidence to establish guidelines for implementation of vitamin D for depression in general practice and other relevant setting s. Study registration Unique identifier : CRD42013003849 Background To improve quality of care and patient outcomes , health system decision-makers need to identify and implement effective interventions . An increasing number of systematic review s document the effects of quality improvement programs to assist decision-makers in developing new initiatives . However , limitations in the reporting of primary studies and current meta- analysis methods ( including approaches for exploring heterogeneity ) reduce the utility of existing syntheses for health system decision-makers . This study will explore the role of innovative meta- analysis approaches and the added value of enriched and up date d data for increasing the utility of systematic review s of complex interventions . Methods / Design We will use the data set from our recent systematic review of 142 r and omized trials of diabetes quality improvement programs  to evaluate novel approaches for exploring heterogeneity . These will include exploratory methods , such as multivariate meta-regression analyses and all-subsets combinatorial meta- analysis . We will then up date our systematic review to include new trials and enrich the data set by surveying authors of all included trials . In doing so , we will explore the impact of variables not , reported in previous publications , such as details of study context , on the effectiveness of the intervention . We will use innovative analytical methods on the enriched and up date d data set to identify key success factors in the implementation of  quality improvement interventions  for diabetes . Decision-makers will be involved throughout to help identify and prioritize variables to be explored and to aid in the interpretation and dissemination of results . Discussion This study will inform future systematic review s of complex interventions and describe the value of enriching and updating data for exploring heterogeneity in meta- analysis . It will also result in an up date d comprehensive systematic review of diabetes quality improvement interventions that will be useful to health system decision-makers in developing interventions to improve outcomes for people with diabetes . Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration no. Background The ideal evidence to answer a question about the effectiveness of treatment is a systematic review . However , for many clinical questions a systematic review will not be available , or may not be up to date . One option could be to use the evidence from an individual trial to answer the question ? Methods We assessed how often ( a ) the estimated effect and ( b ) the p-value in the most precise single trial in a meta- analysis agreed with the whole meta- analysis . For a r and om sample of 200 completed Cochrane Review s ( January , 2005 ) we identified a primary outcome and extracted : the number of trials , the statistical weight of the most precise trial , the estimate and confidence interval for both the highest weighted trial and the meta- analysis overall . We calculated the p-value for the most precise trial and meta- analysis . Results Of 200 review s , only 132 provided a meta- analysis of 2 or more trials , with a further 35 effect estimates based on single trials . The average number of trials was 7.3 , with the most precise trial contributing , on average , 51 % of the statistical weight to the summary estimate from the whole meta- analysis . The estimates of effect from the most precise trial and the overall meta-analyses were highly correlated ( rank correlation of 0.90).There was an 81 % agreement in statistical conclusions . Results from the most precise trial were statistically significant in 60 of the 167 evaluable review s , with 55 of the corresponding systematic review s also being statistically significant . The five discrepant results were not strikingly different with respect to their estimates of effect , but showed considerable statistical heterogeneity between trials in these meta-analyses . However , among the 101 cases in which the most precise trial was not statistically significant , the corresponding meta-analyses yielded 31 statistically significant results . Conclusions Single most precise trials provided similar estimates of effects to those of the meta-analyses to which they contributed , and statistically significant results are generally in agreement . However , " negative " results were less reliable , as may be expected from single underpowered trials . For systematic review ers we suggest that : ( 1 ) key trial(s ) in a review deserve greater attention ( 2 ) systematic review ers should check agreement of the most precise trial and the meta analysis . For clinicians using trials we suggest that when a meta- analysis is not available , a focus on the most precise trial is reasonable provided it is adequately powered Background Socioeconomic inequalities in obesity and associated risk factors for obesity are widening throughout developed countries worldwide . Tackling obesity is high on the public health agenda both in the United Kingdom and internationally . However , what works in terms of interventions that are able to reduce inequalities in obesity is lacking . Methods / Design The review will examine public health interventions at the individual , community and societal level that might reduce inequalities in  obesity among adults aged 18 years and over , in any setting and in any country . The following electronic data bases will be search ed : MEDLINE , EMBASE , CINAHL , PsycINFO , Social Science Citation Index , ASSIA , IBSS , Sociological Abstract s , and the NHS Economic Evaluation Data base . Data base search es will be supplemented with website and gray literature search es . No studies will be excluded based on language , country or publication date . R and omized and non-r and omized controlled trials , prospect i ve and retrospective cohort studies ( with/without control groups ) and prospect i ve repeat cross-sectional studies ( with/without control groups ) that have a primary outcome that is a proxy for body fatness and have examined differential effects with regard to socioeconomic status ( education , income , occupation , social class , deprivation , poverty ) or where the intervention has been targeted specifically at disadvantaged groups or deprived areas will be included . Study inclusion , data extraction and quality appraisal will be conducted by two review ers . Meta- analysis and narrative synthesis will be conducted . The main analysis will examine the effects of 1 ) individual , 2 ) community and 3 ) societal level public health interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in adult obesity . Interventions will be characterized by their level of action and their approach to tackling inequalities . Context ual information on how such public health interventions are organized , implemented and delivered will also be examined . Discussion The review will provide evidence , and reveal any gaps in the evidence base , of public health strategies which reduce and prevent inequalities in the prevalence of obesity in adults and provide information on the organization , implementation and delivery of such interventions . Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number : Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 ( DPP-4 ) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control . Design Systematic review of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) , health economic evaluation studies , systematic review s , and meta-analyses , followed by primary Bayesian mixed treatment comparison meta-analyses ( MTCs ) , and secondary frequentist direct-comparison meta-analyses using a r and om-effects model . Outcomes were reported as weighted mean change from baseline , or odds ratio ( OR ) with 95 % credible interval . Data sources MEDLINE , MEDLINE In-Process , EMBASE , and BIOSIS via Dialog ProQuest ; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Data base of Systematic Review s via EBSCO ; four diabetes and two technical congress abstract s ; and health technology assessment organization websites . Eligibility criteria Patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control receiving any pharmacological anti-diabetic treatment . Data extraction and analysis Title/ abstract s were review ed for eligibility , followed by full-text review of publications remaining after first pass . A three-person team filtered articles and an independent review er checked a r and om selection ( 10 % ) of filtered articles . Data extraction and quality assessment of studies were also independently review ed . Five DPP-4 inhibitors ( alogliptin , linagliptin , saxagliptin , sitagliptin , and vildagliptin ) were compared via meta- analysis ( where data were available ) as monotherapy , dual therapy ( plus metformin , sulfonylurea , pioglitazone , or insulin ) , and triple therapy ( plus metformin/sulfonylurea ) . Results The review identified 6,601 articles ; 163 met inclusion criteria and 85 publications from 83 RCTs contained sufficient or appropriate data for analysis . MTCs demonstrated no differences between DPP-4 inhibitors in mean change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) or body weight , or the proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7 % or experiencing a hypoglycemic event , apart from in patients on alogliptin plus metformin , who achieved HbA1c < 7 % more frequently than those treated with saxagliptin plus metformin [ OR 6.41 ( 95 % CI 3.15–11.98 ) versus 2.17 ( 95 % CI 1.56–2.95 ) ] . Conclusions This systematic review and MTC showed similar efficacy and safety for DPP-4 inhibitors as treatment for type 2 diabetes , either as monotherapy or combination therapy AIMS Pain and anxiety are commonly reported among those undergoing orthopaedic surgery . Improvement in anxiety and pain control might be achieved by supplementing st and ard care with psychological interventions . However , the effectiveness of adjunctive psychosocial interventions in anxiety and pain control have not been addressed sufficiently by previous systematic review s in orthopaedic surgeries . The present study aim ed to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive psychosocial techniques to improve perioperative clinical care in orthopaedic surgery , to identify the most effective intervention types and to evaluate potential moderators . METHODS We will perform a systematic review and meta- analysis to address the study aims . PubMed , PsycINFO , CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses will be search ed between 1980 and 2015 . Prospect i ve controlled clinical trials completed in adults , contrasting st and ard care and st and ard care supplemented with psychosocial methods  , will be eligible for inclusion . Effectiveness will be assessed through the outcomes of postoperative pain intensity , analgesic requirement , perioperative anxiety , quality of life and postoperative recovery . The results of a r and om-effect meta- analysis will be reported . To aid implementation of best practice , moderating effects of the type and timing of psychosocial intervention , type of surgical intervention and type of anaesthesia will be evaluated through meta-regression . Sensitivity analyses and subgroup contrasts will follow as necessary . DISCUSSION Recommendations will be made to improve medical care in orthopaedic procedures . The quality of evidence will be rated using GRADE criteria . Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons , BACKGROUND : Visfatin is an adipocytokine which is secreted from adipose tissue and can affect on the diabetes inflammatory reaction and also serum lipids level . On the other h and , Omega-3 can also prevent formation of insulin resistance . In the present study , the effect of Omega-3 on the serum visfatin concentration was evaluated . METHODS : 71 women with type II diabetes were r and omly assigned to the group that took Omega-3 capsules or control group with placebo capsules . In the first step , study subjects filled a question naire collecting their age , height , weight , waist circumference , and hip circumference . Also their blood sample s were taken for blood tests . In the second step , the intervention was done for 8 weeks and in the third step the aforementioned were collected again . In the blood sample s visfatin and lipid profiles ( low density lipoprotein [ LDL ] , high density lipoprotein [ HDL ] , triglyceride [ TG ] , and cholesterol ) , glucose and HbA1c were measured . RESULTS : There was no significant difference in serum visfatin level between Omega-3 and placebo groups before the intervention ( p = 0.14 ) , while after the intervention , the mean serum visfatin level in the Omega-3 group was significantly higher ( p < 0.001 ) . In addition , the mean difference between the serum visfatin level before and after the intervention in both groups was significant ( p < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS : This study showed an increase in visfatin level following consuming Omega-3 fats but according to controversial issues on insulin-like function of visfatin , the effects of Omega-3 on diabetes should be studied more in further studies Background The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is ubiquitous . Complications and costs of diabetes are rising and are depleting limited re sources . It is imperative for healthcare professionals and patients alike to confront this chronic condition by exploring new interventions . An innovative health care delivery model has emerged in the last 25 years in the form of the group medical visit . Group medical visits can range from of six to twenty patients scheduled together with time allotted for individual care as well as in the group setting . Objectives The review objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta‐ analysis to synthesize the best available evidence related to effectiveness of group medical visits on HbA1c , blood pressure and cholesterol measurements /levels for adult patients with type II diabetes in outpatient setting s. Search strategy A three‐step literature search for studies in English language from 1990 to 2010 was conducted utilising ( a ) a primary search of Medline , CINAHL , PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials , ( b ) a secondary search of non‐indexed data bases , and ( c ) a search of the grey literature . In addition , a manual review of the reference lists of all identified reports and articles was performed to identify additional studies . Inclusion criteria All r and omised and quasi‐experimental studies of adult patients ( > 18 ) with type II diabetes mellitus seen in outpatient health setting s were considered if they met one or more of the following diagnostic outcome measurements : haemoglobin A1c , systolic and diastolic blood pressure , and low density lipoprotein cholesterol . Critical appraisal , data collection and analysis Each of the eligible articles was review ed by two independent review ers . Disagreements between the review ers were resolved through discussion , or with a third review er . Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for method ological quality using the JBI st and ardized critical appraisal tools . Data extraction was undertaken using the st and ardised data extraction tool from JBI‐MAStARI . Main results The search strategy identified 2,040 articles in the published and unpublished literature . Of these , 11 r and omised controlled trials and 4 quasi‐experimental trials met the inclusion criteria and represented 2240 patients included in the final review . There are clear benefits of group medical visits for patients ' HbA1c levels which are consistent in the post‐intervention and change from baseline effect sizes . The most significant effect observed is with the change from baseline results . Some evidence suggests post‐intervention and change from baseline systolic blood pressure improvement at the nine to twelve month interval and change from baseline improvement at the 4 year timeframe . There is no evidence that group visits improve LDL cholesterol values of the group visit participants . Conclusions Group medical visits should be considered by clinicians as an effective non‐pharmacologic intervention that can have a positive impact on biologic markers such as haemoglobin A1c and systolic blood pressure . Implication s for practice The evidence suggests that the most powerful model of Group medical visits ( GMV ) is when a clinician prescriber is present during or immediately after GMV sessions for medication reconciliation or individual patient needs . Implication s for research Future research should include this GMV intervention in r and omised controlled trials across different health systems and socio‐economic and ethnic groups Introduction Type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) has reached epidemic proportions in North America . Recent evidence suggests that prebiotics can modulate the gut microbiome , which then plays an important role in regulating lipid metabolism , blood glucose , and insulin sensitivity . As such , prebiotics are appealing potential therapeutic strategies for prediabetes and T2D . The key objectives of this study were to determine the tolerability as well as the glucose and insulin modulating ability of  MSPrebiotic ® digestion resistant starch ( DRS ) in healthy mid-age ( MID ) and elderly ( ELD ) adults . Material s and methods This was a prospect i ve , blinded , placebo-controlled study . Prediabetes and diabetes were among the exclusion factors . ELD ( > 70 years ) and MID ( 30–50 years ) Canadian adults were recruited and , after 2 weeks of consuming placebo , they were r and omized to consume 30 g of either MSPrebiotic ® or placebo per day for 12 weeks . In total , 42 ELD and 42 MID participants completed the study . Blood sample s were collected over the 14-week study and analyzed for glucose , lipid profile , and CRP , lipid particles , TNF-α , IL-10 , insulin , and insulin resistance ( IR ) . Results At baseline , the ELD population had a significantly higher percentage ( p < 0.01 ) with elevated glucose and significantly higher TNF-α ( p < 0.01 ) compared to MID adults .  MSPrebiotic ® DRS was well tolerated in both MID and ELD adults . There was a significant difference over time in blood glucose ( p = 0.0301 ) and insulin levels ( p = 0.009 ) , as well as IR ( HOMA-IR ; p = 0.009 ) in ELD adults who consumed MSPrebiotic ® compared to placebo . No significant changes were found in MID adults . Conclusion Our results suggest that dietary supplementation with prebiotics such as MSPrebiotic ® may be part of an effective strategy to reduce IR , a major risk factor for developing T2D , in the ELD . Clinical Trial Registration NCT01977183 listed on NIH website : Clinical Trials.gov , The meta data generated in this study have been su bmi tted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/381931 ) CONTEXT To the best of our knowledge , no study has examined the effects of vitamin D-calcium cosupplementation on inflammatory biomarkers and adipocytokines in vitamin D-insufficient type 2 diabetics . OBJECTIVE This study was performed to assess the effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers and adipocytokines in vitamin D-insufficient people with type 2 diabetes . METHODS Totally , 118 diabetic patients were enrolled in this r and omized , placebo-controlled clinical trial . After matching for age , sex , body mass index , type and dose of hypoglycemic agents , and duration of diabetes , subjects were r and omly assigned into 4 groups receiving the following : 1 ) 50000 IU/wk vitamin D + calcium placebo ; 2 ) 1000 mg/d calcium + vitamin D placebo ; 3 ) 50 000 IU/wk vitamin D + 1000 mg/d calcium ; or 4 ) vitamin D placebo + calcium placebo for 8 weeks . Blood sampling was done for the quantification of inflammatory biomarkers and adipocytokines at the study baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention . RESULTS Calcium ( changes from baseline : -75 ± 19 ng/ml , P = .01 ) and vitamin D alone ( -56 ± 19 ng/mL , P = .01 ) and joint calcium-vitamin D supplementation ( -92 ± 19 ng/mL , P = .01 ) result ed in a significant reduction in serum leptin levels compared with placebo ( -9 ± 18 ng/mL ) . This was also the case for serum IL-6 , such that calcium ( -2 ± 1 pg/mL , P < .001 ) and vitamin D alone ( -4 ± 1 pg/mL , P < .001 ) and their combination ( -4 ± 1 pg/mL , P < .001 ) led to significant reductions compared with placebo ( 3 ± 1 pg/mL ) . After adjustment for potential confounders , individuals in the calcium ( -3.1 ± 1.3 , P < .05 ) , vitamin D ( -3.1 ± 1.3 , P < .05 ) , and joint calcium-vitamin D groups ( -3.4 ± 1.3 , P < .05 ) had greater reductions in serum TNF-α concentrations compared with placebo ( 0.1 ± 1.2 ) . Individuals who received joint calcium-vitamin D supplements tended to have a decrease in serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels compared with placebo after controlling for baseline levels ( -1.14 ± 0.25 vs 0.02 ± 0.24 ng/mL , P = .09 ) . CONCLUSION Joint calcium-vitamin D supplementation might improve systemic inflammation through decreasing IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations in vitamin D-insufficient people with type 2 diabetes OBJECTIVE Low vitamin D levels predict the development of diabetes . This double-blind , r and omized , control study in subjects with prediabetes and hypovitaminosis D evaluated whether high doses of vitamin D for 1 year affected insulin secretion , insulin sensitivity , and the development of diabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 1,551 subjects ≥40 years of age not known to have diabetes were screened with A1C levels . Subjects with A1C levels of 5.8–6.9 % underwent an oral glucose tolerance test ( OGTT ) . Subjects with prediabetes and 25-OH vitamin D ( 25-OHD ) levels < 30 ng/mL were r and omized to receive weekly placebo ( n = 53 ) or vitamin D ( n = 56 ) with doses based on body weight and baseline 25-OHD levels . OGTTs were performed 3 , 6 , 9 , and 12 months later . Insulin secretion and sensitivity were measured , and the proportion of subjects developing diabetes was assessed . RESULTS 25-OHD levels rapidly rose from 22 to nearly 70 ng/mL after vitamin D supplementation with a mean weekly dose of 88,865 IU . There were no differences between the placebo and vitamin D groups regarding fasting plasma glucose , 2-h glucose , or insulin secretion and sensitivity or in the percent developing diabetes or returning to normal glucose tolerance . No subjects experienced increased serum or urinary calcium levels . At 12 months , A1C levels were significantly slightly less ( 0.2 % ) in the vitamin D group . CONCLUSIONS In individuals with prediabetes and hypovitaminosis D , doses of vitamin D supplementation design ed to raise serum 25-OHD levels into the upper-normal range for 1 year had no effect on insulin secretion , insulin sensitivity , or the development of diabetes  compared with placebo administration Prognostic markers help to stratify patients for treatment by identifying patients with different risks of outcome ( e.g. recurrence of disease ) , and are important tools in the management of cancer and many other diseases . Systematic review and meta-analytical approaches to identifying the most valuable prognostic markers are needed because ( sometimes conflicting ) evidence relating to markers is often published across a number of studies . To investigate the practicality of this approach , an empirical investigation of a systematic review of  tumour markers for neuroblastoma was performed ; 260 studies of prognostic markers were identified , which considered 130 different markers . The reporting of these studies was often inadequate , in terms of both statistical analysis and presentation , and there was considerable heterogeneity for many important clinical /statistical factors . These problems restricted both the extraction of data and the meta- analysis of results from the primary studies , limiting feasibility of the evidence -based approach . Guidelines for reporting the results of primary prognostic marker studies in cancer , and other diseases , are given in order to facilitate both the interpretation of individual studies and the undertaking of systematic review s , meta- analysis and , ultimately , evidence -based practice . General availability of full individual patient data is a necessary step forward and would overcome the majority of problems encountered , including poorly reported summary statistics and variability in cutoff level , outcome assessed and adjustment factors used . It would also limit the problem of reporting bias , although publication bias will remain a concern until studies are prospect ively registered . Such changes in practice would help important evidence -based review s to be conducted in order to establish the most appropriate prognostic markers for clinical use , which should ultimately improve patient care Introduction Vitamin D has potential benefits for extraskeletal health . These could include an anti-inflammatory effect as well as a reduction in endothelial dysfunction . We aim to provide quality evidence for the hypothesis that supplementation with vitamin D will improve endothelial function ( EF ) , possibly through the abrogation of systemic inflammation . Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic review of all r and omised controlled trials on  vitamin D supplementation and EF lasting 12 weeks or more . The search will cover the period 2000–2015 and include studies that describe direct measures of EF  , markers of endothelial cell ( EC ) activation  and if concurrently reported , indicators of systemic inflammation  . Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses ( PRISMA ) guidelines and study quality will be assessed by the Jadad score in addition to an evaluation of allocation concealment and data analysis . If sufficient data are available , a meta- analysis will be conducted . The effect sizes will be generated using Hedges ’ g score , for both fixed and r and om effect models . I2 statistics and Galbraith plots will be used to assess heterogeneity and identify their potential sources . Potential publication and small sample size bias will be assessed by visual inspections of funnel plots and also Egger 's test . Meta-regression analysis ( if feasible ) will be conducted with restricted maximum likelihood ( REML ) estimation method , controlling for potential confounders ( demographics , study methods , location , etc ) . A backward elimination process will be applied in the regression modelling procedure . Subgroup analysis , conditional on number of studies retrieved and their sample size , will be stratified on participant disease category , total dose administered , degree of 25(OH)D change and type of supplement used . Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected . The results will be disseminated through a peer- review ed publication , conference presentation and the popular press . Trial registration number International Prospect i ve Register for Systematic Review s ( PROSPERO ) number CRD42014013523 BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of mortality among diabetic patients . The concentration of malondialdehyde ( MDA ) and homocysteine is believed to play a role in cardiovascular diseases . Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation could be effective in some diabetes complications and in the control of the glycemic index . However , it may increase lipid peroxidation . The objective of this study was to determine the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on the concentration of homocysteine and MDA in diabetic patients . METHODS AND RESULTS A r and omized double-blind , placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted on 81 patients with type 2 diabetes . The patients were r and omly assigned to either the treatment or control groups . Each subject received three capsules of omega-3 fatty acids or a placebo every day for a period of 2months . The two groups were similar in terms of body mass index and food intake . At the beginning of the study and after 2months of supplementation their levels of HbA(1)c , homocysteine , MDA , C-reactive protein ( CRP ) , total cholesterol , LDL-cholesterol and fasting blood sugar ( FBS ) were determined . Due to omega-3 fatty acid supplementation , homocysteine was changed significantly in both treatment and control groups up to -3.10mumol/L and 0.10mumol/L respectively , and HbA(1)c decreased by 0.75 % in the treatment group and increased by 0.26 % in the control group . However , the changes in fasting blood sugar ( FBS ) , malondialdehyde ( MDA ) , C-reactive protein ( CRP ) , total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels were not significant . CONCLUSION The consumption of omega-3 fatty acid supplements ( 3g/day ) for 2months decreases the levels of homocysteine in diabetic patients with no change in FBS , MDA and CRP levels BACKGROUND Discerning the determinants of weight loss maintenance is important in the planning of future interventions and policies regarding overweight and obesity . We have therefore systematic ally synthesized recent literature on determinants of weight loss maintenance for individuals with overweight and obesity . METHODS With the use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses statement , prospect i ve studies were identified from search es in PubMed and PsycINFO from 2006 to 2016 . We included articles investigating adults with overweight and obesity undergoing weight loss without surgery or medication .  Included articles were scored on their method ological quality , and a best- evidence synthesis was applied to summarize the results . RESULTS Our search result ed in 8,222 articles of which 67 articles were selected . In total , 124 determinants were identified of which 5 were demographic , 59 were behavioural , 51 were psychological/cognitive and 9 were social and physical environmental determinants . We found consistent evidence that demographic determinants were not predictive of weight loss maintenance . Behavioural and cognitive determinants that promote a reduction in energy intake , an increase in energy expenditure and monitoring of this balance are predictive determinants . CONCLUSION This review identifies key determinants in weight loss maintenance . However , more research regarding cognitive and environmental determinants of weight loss maintenance is needed to advance our knowledge on determinants of weight loss maintenance Introduction While a number of strategies are being implemented to control cardiovascular diseases ( CVDs ) and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) , the cost-effectiveness of these in the South Asian context has not been systematic ally evaluated . We aim to systematic ally review the economic ( cost-effectiveness ) evidence available on the individual- , group- and population -level interventions for control of CVD and T2DM in South Asia . Methods and analysis This review will consider all relevant economic evaluations , either conducted alongside r and omised controlled trials or based on decision modelling estimates . These studies must include participants at risk of developing CVD/T2DM or with established disease in one or more of the South Asian countries ( India , Bangladesh , Pakistan , Sri Lanka , Nepal , Maldives , Bhutan and Afghanistan ) . We will identify relevant papers by systematic ally search ing all major data bases and registries . Selected articles will be screened by two independent research ers . Method ological quality of the studies will be assessed using a modified Drummond and a Phillips checklist . Cochrane guidelines will be followed for bias assessment in the effectiveness studies . Results Results will be presented in line with the PRISMA ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta- analysis ) checklist , and overall quality of evidence will be presented as per the GRADE ( Grade s of Recommendation , Assessment , Development and Evaluation ) approach . Ethics and dissemination The study has received ethics approval from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi , India . The results of this review will provide policy-relevant recommendations for the uptake of cost-effectiveness evidence in prioritising decisions on essential chronic disease care packages for South Asia . Study registration number PROSPERO CRD42013006479 PURPOSE Health interventions based on theory may be more effective than those that are not . This review of review s synthesizes all published r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) meta-analytic evidence from the last decade to examine whether theory-based interventions were found to be associated with more effective  adult health behaviour change interventions . METHODS Systematic review s including meta-analyses were identified by search ing Medline , CINAHL , PsycINFO , and CDSR . A narrative synthesis was used to summarize and analyse the evidence . Only review s including RCTs of health behaviour change interventions with adults aged 18 + published from 2007 to 2017 were included . RESULTS Of 8,659 articles , nine systematic review s met inclusion criteria . The majority of review s ( n = 8) suggested no increased effectiveness for theory-based compared to non-theory-based interventions for effectiveness of outcomes relating to health behaviour . Less than half of the RCTs included in the review s reported the use of theory ( 85/183 ) . Two review s suggested interventions based on control theory , motivational interviewing , or self-determination theory were associated with greater effectiveness for physical activity and /or dietary interventions and outcomes . Method ological and reporting issues limit the conclusions . CONCLUSIONS Theory-based interventions as currently operationalized in systematic review s were not found to be more effective than non-theory-based interventions . Method ological and reporting issues at study and review level may not reflect the true utility of theory use within health behaviour interventions . The promotion of theory use may benefit from using a multifaceted argument , rather than a narrow focus of increased effectiveness . Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject ? Theory use is regularly promoted by cl aim ing that it will lead to more effective behaviour change interventions . Theory use has been frequently linked to effectiveness within systematic review s of behaviour change interventions . The theory-effectiveness hypothesis has not been systematic ally examined at the systematic review level . What does this study add ? Theory use as operationalized by systematic review authors was not associated with increased effectiveness within systematic review s examining r and omized controlled trials of behaviour change interventions in adults . Interventions based on control theory , motivational interviewing , or self-determination theory were associated with greater effectiveness for physical activity and /or dietary interventions and outcomes . Theory use should be promoted using a multifaceted argument , and assertions for increased effectiveness of theory-based interventions should only be used in domains where specific evidence exists to support this cl aim Traditional clinical review articles , also known as up date s , differ from systematic review s and meta-analyses . Up date s selectively review the medical literature while discussing a topic broadly . Non-quantitative systematic review s comprehensively examine the medical literature , seeking to identify and synthesize all relevant information to formulate the best approach to diagnosis or treatment . Meta-analyses ( quantitative systematic review s ) seek to answer a focused clinical question , using rigorous statistical analysis of pooled research studies . This article presents guidelines for writing an evidence -based clinical review article for American Family Physician . First , the topic should be of common interest and relevance to family practice . Include a table of the continuing medical education objectives of the review . State how the literature search was done and include several sources of evidence -based review s , such as the Cochrane Collaboration , BMJ 's Clinical Evidence , or the InfoRetriever Web site . Where possible , use evidence based on clinical outcomes relating to morbidity , mortality , or quality of life , and studies of primary care population s. In articles su bmi tted to American Family Physician , rate the level of evidence for key recommendations according to the following scale : level A ( r and omized controlled trial [ RCT ] , meta- analysis ) ; level B ( other evidence ) ; level C ( consensus/expert opinion ) . Finally , provide a table of key summary points Background There is increasing pressure to address the social determinants of health ( SDoH ) and health inequities through the implementation of culturally acceptable interventions particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa ( SSA ) where health outcomes are generally poor . Available evaluation research on cash transfers ( CTs ) suggests that the programs may influence the wider determinants of health in SSA ; yet , there has been no attempt to synthesize the evidence regarding their contribution to tackling the SDoH and health inequalities . To date , nearly all the review s on CTs ' impact on health have predominantly featured evidence from Latin America with limited transferability to the social , cultural , and political environments in SSA . Therefore , the aim of this study is to undertake a systematic review to assess the role of CTs in tackling the wider determinants of health and health inequalities in SSA . Methods / design A systematic review of published and unpublished literature on CTs ’ impact on health and health determinants covering the period 2000–2016 will be undertaken . Studies will be considered for inclusion if they present quantitative or qualitative data , including all relevant study design s. The SDoH conceptual framework will be used to guide the data extraction process . EPPI Review er software will be used for data management and analysis . Studies included in the review will be analyzed by narrative synthesis and /or meta- analysis as appropriate for the nature of the data retrieved . Discussion This review will provide empirical evidence on the impact of CTs on SDoH to inform CT policy , implementation , and research in SSA . The protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis Protocol s ( PRISMA -P ) . Systematic review registration This protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO international prospect i ve register of systematic review s , reference CRD42015025015
Levels of other adipocytokines were not significantly affected .
CONCLUSION Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation may increase adiponectin and reduce TNF-α levels in this population group .
BACKGROUND The objective of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to determine the effects of omega-3 supplementation on adipocytokine levels in adult prediabetic and diabetic individuals .