Effectiveness of Patient Choice in Nonoperative vs Surgical Management of Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis. Non-operative management of early, acute appendicitis in children: is it safe and effective? Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. Conservative approach versus urgent appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Conservative Management of Acute Appendicitis It is not what you do, it is the way that you do it: impact of a care pathway for appendicitis. Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis. Non‐operative Management for Uncomplicated Appendicitis: An Option to Consider Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis Long-Term Results Following Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Adults Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. A National Evaluation of the Conservative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: How Common Is This and What Are the Issues? Nonperforative appendicitis: a continuing surgical dilemma. The NOTA study: non-operative treatment for acute appendicitis: prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotic treatment (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) in patients with right sided lower abdominal pain Retraction Note to: Conservative Management of Acute Appendicitis Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. Antibiotic management of surgically treated gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. Comparison of gentamicin and clindamycin versus cefamandole versus cefoperazone. Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study. Decreased resource utilization since initiation of institutional clinical pathway for care of children with perforated appendicitis. Initial antibiotic treatment for acute simple appendicitis in children is safe: Short-term results from a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Are antibiotics necessary in nonperforated appendicitis in children? A double blind randomized controlled trial. Economic evaluation of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis from the APPAC randomized clinical trial
IMPORTANCE Current evidence suggests that nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis is safe , but overall effectiveness is determined by combining medical outcomes with the patient 's and family 's perspective , goals , and expectations . OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of patient choice in nonoperative vs surgical management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS Prospect i ve patient choice cohort study in patients aged 7 to 17 years with acute uncomplicated appendicitis presenting at a single pediatric tertiary acute care hospital from October 1 , 2012 , through March 6 , 2013 . Participating patients and families gave informed consent and chose between nonoperative management and urgent appendectomy . INTERVENTIONS Urgent appendectomy or nonoperative management entailing at least 24 hours of inpatient observation while receiving intravenous antibiotics and , on demonstrating improvement of symptoms , completion of 10 days of treatment with oral antibiotics . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the 1-year success rate of nonoperative management . Successful nonoperative management was defined as not undergoing an appendectomy . Secondary outcomes included comparisons of the rates of complicated appendicitis , disability days , and health care costs between nonoperative management and surgery . RESULTS A total of 102 patients were enrolled ; 65 patients /families chose appendectomy ( median age , 12 years ; interquartile range [ IQR ] , 9 - 13 years ; 45 male [ 69.2 % ] ) and 37 patients /families chose nonoperative management ( median age , 11 years ; IQR , 10 - 14 years ; 24 male [ 64.9 % ] ) . Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups . The success rate of nonoperative management was 89.2 % ( 95 % CI , 74.6%-97.0 % ) at 30 days ( 33 of 37 children ) and 75.7 % ( 95 % CI , 58.9%-88.2 % ) at 1 year ( 28 of 37 children ) . The incidence of complicated appendicitis was 2.7 % in the nonoperative group ( 1 of 37 children ) and 12.3 % in the surgery group ( 8 of 65 children ) ( P = .15 ) . After 1 year , children managed nonoperatively compared with the surgery group had fewer disability days ( median [ IQR ] , 8 [ 5 - 18 ] vs 21 [ 15 - 25 ] days , respectively ; P < .001 ) and lower appendicitis-related health care costs ( median [ IQR ] , $ 4219 [ $ 2514-$7795 ] vs $ 5029 [ $ 4596-$5482 ] , respectively ; P = .01 ) . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE When chosen by the family , nonoperative management is an effective treatment strategy for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis , incurring less morbidity and lower costs than surgery . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT01718275 PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine if early , acute appendicitis in children can be safely and effectively managed with antibiotics alone . METHODS A retrospective review was performed of children ( < 18 yrs ) treated non-operatively ( NOM ) for early , acute appendicitis since May 2012 . These were compared to patients treated with appendectomy between January 2011 and October 2011 ( OM ) . Inclusion criteria included : ( a ) symptoms < 48 h , ( b ) localized peritonitis , and ( c ) ultrasound findings consistent with early , acute appendicitis . RESULTS Twelve patients ( 66 % female , mean age 12.2,SD=4.2 yrs ) were treated non-operatively , while 12 ( 50 % female , mean age 12.5,SD=3.2 yrs ) were treated operatively . Two NOM children ( 16.7 % ) required initial appendectomy . One patient developed recurrent appendicitis requiring appendectomy 7 months post-discharge . Four other NOM patients returned with symptoms but did not require admission or surgery . Two OM patients ( 8.3 % ) had hospital visits and admissions related to surgical site infections . Mean length of stay ( LOS ) for the first visit was 1.5 days ( SD=1.0d ) ( NOM ) vs. 1.3 days ( SD=0.5d ) ( OM ) ( p=0.61 ) . Including first and subsequent admissions , mean LOS was 1.8 days ( SD=1.1d ) ( NOM ) vs. 1.7 days ( SD=1.5d ) ( OM ) ( p=0.97 ) . CONCLUSION Early acute appendicitis in appropriately selected children can be successfully treated non-operatively . R and omized trials with longer follow-up are required IMPORTANCE An increasing amount of evidence supports the use of antibiotics instead of surgery for treating patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis . OBJECTIVE To compare antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by computed tomography ( CT ) . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS The Appendicitis Acuta ( APPAC ) multicenter , open-label , noninferiority r and omized clinical trial was conducted from November 2009 until June 2012 in Finl and . The trial enrolled 530 patients aged 18 to 60 years with uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by a CT scan . Patients were r and omly assigned to early appendectomy or antibiotic treatment with a 1-year follow-up period . INTERVENTIONS Patients r and omized to antibiotic therapy received intravenous ertapenem ( 1 g/d ) for 3 days followed by 7 days of oral levofloxacin ( 500 mg once daily ) and metronidazole ( 500 mg 3 times per day ) . Patients r and omized to the surgical treatment group were assigned to undergo st and ard open appendectomy . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point for the surgical intervention was the successful completion of an appendectomy . The primary end point for antibiotic-treated patients was discharge from the hospital without the need for surgery and no recurrent appendicitis during a 1-year follow-up period . RESULTS There were 273 patients in the surgical group and 257 in the antibiotic group . Of 273 patients in the surgical group , all but 1 underwent successful appendectomy , result ing in a success rate of 99.6 % ( 95 % CI , 98.0 % to 100.0 % ) . In the antibiotic group , 70 patients ( 27.3 % ; 95 % CI , 22.0 % to 33.2 % ) underwent appendectomy within 1 year of initial presentation for appendicitis . Of the 256 patients available for follow-up in the antibiotic group , 186 ( 72.7 % ; 95 % CI , 66.8 % to 78.0 % ) did not require surgery . The intention-to-treat analysis yielded a difference in treatment efficacy between groups of -27.0 % ( 95 % CI , -31.6 % to ∞ ) ( P = .89 ) . Given the prespecified noninferiority margin of 24 % , we were unable to demonstrate noninferiority of antibiotic treatment relative to surgery . Of the 70 patients r and omized to antibiotic treatment who subsequently underwent appendectomy , 58 ( 82.9 % ; 95 % CI , 72.0 % to 90.8 % ) had uncomplicated appendicitis , 7 ( 10.0 % ; 95 % CI , 4.1 % to 19.5 % ) had complicated acute appendicitis , and 5 ( 7.1 % ; 95 % CI , 2.4 % to 15.9 % ) did not have appendicitis but received appendectomy for suspected recurrence . There were no intra-abdominal abscesses or other major complications associated with delayed appendectomy in patients r and omized to antibiotic treatment . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with CT-proven , uncomplicated appendicitis , antibiotic treatment did not meet the prespecified criterion for noninferiority compared with appendectomy . Most patients r and omized to antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis did not require appendectomy during the 1-year follow-up period , and those who required appendectomy did not experience significant complications . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT01022567 BACKGROUND Surgical management of acute appendicitis with appendiceal abscess or phlegmon remains controversial . We studied the results of initial conservative treatment ( antibiotics and percutaneous drainage if necessary , with or without interval appendectomy ) compared with immediate surgery . METHODS We undertook an observational , retrospective cohort study of patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of acute appendicitis with an abscess or phlegmon , treated in our hospital between January 1997 and March 2009 . Patients younger than 14 , with severe sepsis or with diffuse peritonitis were excluded . A study group of 15 patients with acute appendicitis complicated with an abscess or phlegmon underwent conservative treatment . A control group was composed of the other patients , who all underwent  urgent appendectomy  , matched for age and later r and omized 1:1 . The infectious risk stratification was established with the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System ( NNIS ) index . Dependent variables were hospital stay and surgical site infection . Analysis was with SPSS , with p < 0.05 considered significant . RESULTS Interval appendectomy  was performed in 7 study group patients . Surgical site infection episodes were more frequent in the control group ( 6 vs. 0 , p < 0.001 ) . A greater percentage of high risk patients ( NNIS ≥ 2 ) was identified in the control group ( 80 vs. 28.7 % , p < 0.03 ) , mostly related with contaminated or dirty procedures in this group ( p < 0.001 ) . No significant difference between groups was found in hospital stay . CONCLUSION Initial conservative treatment should be considered the best therapeutic choice for acute appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon Background The acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency , and the primary treatment has been appendicectomy . Antibiotics are started preoperatively and continued postoperatively as needed . Methods This prospect i ve study was carried out at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences , Soura , Srinagar , Kashmir , India to determine the role of antibiotics as the only treatment in acute appendicitis and the analgesic consumption needed . Total of 80 patients were included in the study with a duration of abdominal pain less than 72 h. Out of 80 patients , 40 patients received antibiotics intravenously for 2 days followed by oral treatment for 7 days , while another 40 patients considered as controls were r and omized to surgery . Results Patients managed conservatively were discharged within 3 days except for two— patients who required surgery after 12 and 24 h , respectively , because of peritonitis due to perforated appendicitis . Four patients were readmitted within 1 year as a result of recurrent appendicitis and had to undergo surgery when appendicitis was confirmed . The diagnostic accuracy within the operated group was 90 % . Two patients had perforated appendicitis at operation . Conclusion Our conclusion is that antibiotic treatment in the patients with acute appendicitis is quite effective , and these patients may not need surgery . The patients managed conservatively with antibiotics alone experience less pain and require less analgesia but have high recurrent rate BACKGROUND / PURPOSE Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children . However , management varies widely . The aim of this study was to assess the impact of introducing a care pathway on the management of childhood appendicitis . METHODS Data were collected prospect ively for 3 successive cohorts : All patients operated for suspected appendicitis were included . The pathway was modified after interim analysis of group B data . P < .05 was significant . RESULTS Six hundred patients were included . When compared with group A , group C patients were more likely to receive  preoperative antibiotics  ( P < .0001 ) , undergo  formal pain assessment ( P < .0001 ) , and be operated before midnight ( P = .025 ) . There was a significant decrease in readmission rates from 10.0 % to 4.2 % ( P = .023 ) despite an increase in cases of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis ( P = .010 ) . CONCLUSIONS The introduction of a care pathway result ed in improved compliance with antibiotic regimens , more frequent pain assessment , and fewer post-midnight operations . Postappendicectomy readmission rates were reduced despite an increase in disease severity . This was achieved by critical reevaluation of outcomes and pathway re design where appropriate PURPOSE Urgent appendectomy has long been the st and ard of care for acute appendicitis . Six r and omized trials have demonstrated that antibiotics can safely treat appendicitis , but approximately 1 in 4 of these patients eventually requires appendectomy . Overall treatment success may be limited by complex disease including perforation . Patients ׳ success on antibiotic therapy may depend on preoperative identification of complex disease on imaging . However , the effectiveness of computed tomography ( CT ) in differentiating complex disease including perforated from nonperforated appendicitis remains to be determined . The purpose of this study was to assess the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of CT in determining appendiceal perforation in patients operated for acute appendicitis . METHODS We performed a retrospective review of pathology and radiology reports from consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with suspicion for acute appendicitis between January 2012 and May 2015 .  CT scans were re- review ed by abdominal imaging fellowship-trained radiologists using st and ardized criteria , and the radiologists were blinded to pathology and surgical findings . Radiologists specifically noted presence or absence of periappendiceal gas , abscess , appendicolith , fat str and ing , and bowel wall thickening . The overall radiologic impression as well as these specific imaging findings was compared to results of pathology and operative reports . Pathology reports were considered the st and ard for diagnostic accuracy . RESULTS Eighty-nine patients ( 65 % male , average age of 34 years ) presenting with right lower quadrant pain  underwent CT imaging and prompt appendectomy . Final pathology reported perforation in 48 % ( n = 43 ) of cases . Radiologic diagnosis of perforation was reported in 9 % ( n = 8) , correctly identifying perforation in 37.5 % ( n = 3 ) , and incorrectly reporting perforation in 62.5 % of nonperforated cases per pathology . Radiology missed 93 % ( n = 40 ) of perforations postoperatively diagnosed by pathology . There was no secondary finding ( fat str and ing , diameter > 13 mm , abscess , cecal wall thickening , periappendiceal gas , simple fluid collection , appendicolith , and phlegmon ) with a clinical ly reliable sensitivity or specificity to predict perforated appendicitis . Surgeon׳s report of perforation was consistent with the pathology report of perforation in only 28 % of cases . CONCLUSIONS The usefulness of a CT for determining perforation in acute appendicitis is limited , and methods to improve precision in identifying patients with complicated appendicitis should be explored as this may help for improving risk prediction for failure of treatment with antibiotic therapy and help guide patients and providers in shared decision-making for treatment options Abstract Aim The main goal of our study was to assess a 7 days long course of antibiotics for acute uncomplicated appendicitis . Material s and Methods From March 2014 to November 2015 , all patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis have been considered to be treated by only antibiotics .  Inclusion criteria included clinical ( tenderness ) , biological ( C‐reactive protein [ CRP ] < 50 ) , and radiological features ( diameter > 6 mm ) . All patients were treated with intravenous amoxicillin and clavulanic acid ( 100 mg/kg/day ) for 2 days ( six doses ) . At the end of the treatment , clinical and para clinical examinations included blood sample s at day 7 and ultrasound ( US ) scan at 3 months . Results A total of 166 patients were treated and followed up prospect ively during the study period . Mean age at diagnosis was 10.8 ± 0.6 years . All children , but four were discharged with a clinical improvement after 48 hours and six intravenous antibiotics injection according to our protocol . Four children required surgery during the initial hospitalization period . Initial ultrasound scan showed a mean diameter of 7.85 ± 1.6 mm , with inflamed fat in 124 patients ( 74.7 % ) . At Day 7 , the diameter was 5.2 ± 1.6 mm ( p < 0.0001 ) . During a median follow‐up of 18.8 months ( 3.5‐18 ) , 22 patients ( 13.25 % ) had to be managed for a novel episode of acute appendicitis after a median period of 138 days ( 13‐270 ) . None had to be managed for a complicated appendicitis . Conclusion Non‐operative treatment ( NOT ) is a safe alternative for the management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children . Further study should be conducted to determine relapse risk factors Uncomplicated appendicitis may resolve spontaneously or require treatment with antibiotics or appendicectomy . The aim of this r and omized trial was to compare the outcome of a non‐antibiotic management strategy with that of antibiotic therapy in uncomplicated appendicitis Background Antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis has gained interest and inquiries . Reports have demonstrated both safety and high resolution of symptoms and inflammation following antibiotic treatment of appendicitis , but information on long-term results is required . Our present aim was therefore to evaluate long-term recurrence rate of initial antibiotics-alone treatment for suspected acute appendicitis . Methods Patients with favourable response to antibiotics in earlier r and omized ( RCT , n = 97 ) and population -based ( PBT , n = 342 ) studies as well as subsequently treated non-r and omized ( Non-R , n = 271 ) patients are evaluated for long-term risk to relapse dem and ing surgical appendectomy ; altogether 710 patients . Results Clinical characteristics among r and omized and non-r and omized patients were similar without any statistical difference according to abdominal symptoms and degree of systemic inflammation ( CRP , WCC ) when antibiotic treatment started . Females and males showed the same results . The median follow-up time was 2162 days ( 5.92 years ) , and the range across highest and lowest follow-up was 3495 days ( range 2–3497 ) for the entire group , without significant differences among subgroups ( RCT , PBT , Non-R ) . The cumulative probability for relapse of appendicitis dem and ing appendectomy was : 0.09 , 0.12 , 0.12 and 0.13 at 1- , 2- , 3- and 5-year follow-up , with a probability of 0.86 ± 0.013 without appendectomy after 8 years . This may imply an overall benefit of 60–70 % by antibiotics during expected 10-year follow-up accounting for initial treatment failures at 10–23 % in our published reports . Conclusion Antibiotic treatment is safe and effective as a first-line therapy in unselected adults with acute appendicitis with a risk around 15 % for long-term relapse following favourable initial treatment response Importance Short-term results support antibiotics as an alternative to surgery for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis , but long-term outcomes are not known . Objective To determine the late recurrence rate of appendicitis after antibiotic therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis . Design , Setting , and Participants Five-year observational follow-up of patients in the Appendicitis Acuta ( APPAC ) multicenter r and omized clinical trial comparing appendectomy with antibiotic therapy , in which 530 patients aged 18 to 60 years with computed tomography – confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis were r and omized to undergo an appendectomy ( n = 273 ) or receive antibiotic therapy ( n = 257 ) . The initial trial was conducted from November 2009 to June 2012 in Finl and ; last follow-up was September 6 , 2017 . This current analysis focused on assessing the 5-year outcomes for the group of patients treated with antibiotics alone . Interventions Open appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy with intravenous ertapenem for 3 days followed by 7 days of oral levofloxacin and metronidazole . Main Outcomes and Measures In this analysis , prespecified secondary end points reported at 5-year follow-up included late ( after 1 year ) appendicitis recurrence after antibiotic treatment , complications , length of hospital stay , and sick leave . Results Of the 530 patients ( 201 women ; 329 men ) enrolled in the trial , 273 patients ( median age , 35 years [ IQR , 27 - 46 ] ) were r and omized to undergo appendectomy , and 257 ( median age , 33 years , [ IQR , 26 - 47 ] ) were r and omized to receive antibiotic therapy . In addition to 70 patients who initially received antibiotics but underwent appendectomy within the first year ( 27.3 % [ 95 % CI , 22.0%-33.2 % ] ; 70/256 ) , 30 additional antibiotic-treated patients ( 16.1 % [ 95 % CI , 11.2%-22.2 % ] ; 30/186 ) underwent appendectomy between 1 and 5 years . The cumulative incidence of appendicitis recurrence was 34.0 % ( 95 % CI , 28.2%-40.1 % ; 87/256 ) at 2 years , 35.2 % ( 95 % CI , 29.3%-41.4 % ; 90/256 ) at 3 years , 37.1 % ( 95 % CI , 31.2%-43.3 % ; 95/256 ) at 4 years , and 39.1 % ( 95 % CI , 33.1%-45.3 % ; 100/256 ) at 5 years . Of the 85 patients in the antibiotic group who subsequently underwent appendectomy for recurrent appendicitis , 76 had uncomplicated appendicitis , 2 had complicated appendicitis , and 7 did not have appendicitis . At 5 years , the overall complication rate ( surgical site infections , incisional hernias , abdominal pain , and obstructive symptoms ) was 24.4 % ( 95 % CI , 19.2%-30.3 % ) ( n = 60/246 ) in the appendectomy group and 6.5 % ( 95 % CI , 3.8%-10.4 % ) ( n = 16/246 ) in antibiotic group ( P < .001 ) , which calculates to 17.9 percentage points ( 95 % CI , 11.7 - 24.1 ) higher after surgery . There was no difference between groups for length of hospital stay , but there was a significant difference in sick leave ( 11 days more for the appendectomy group ) . Conclusions and Relevance Among patients who were initially treated with antibiotics for uncomplicated acute appendicitis , the likelihood of late recurrence within 5 years was 39.1 % . This long-term follow-up supports the feasibility of antibiotic treatment alone as an alternative to surgery for uncomplicated acute appendicitis . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of nonoperative treatment of acute nonperforated appendicitis with antibiotics in children . METHODS A pilot r and omized controlled trial was performed comparing nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute appendicitis in children . Patients with imaging-confirmed acute nonperforated appendicitis who would normally have had emergency appendectomy were r and omized either to treatment with antibiotics or to surgery . Follow-up was for 1 year . RESULTS Fifty patients were enrolled ; 26 were r and omized to surgery and 24 to nonoperative treatment with  antibiotics . All children in the surgery group had histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis , and there were no significant complications in this group . Two of 24 patients in the nonoperative treatment group had appendectomy within the time of primary antibiotic treatment and 1 patient after 9 months for recurrent acute appendicitis . Another 6 patients have had an appendectomy due to recurrent abdominal pain ( n = 5 ) or parental wish ( n = 1 ) during the follow-up period ; none of these 6 patients had evidence of appendicitis on histopathological examination . CONCLUSIONS Twenty-two of 24 patients ( 92 % ) treated with antibiotics had initial resolution of symptoms . Of these 22 , only 1 patient ( 5 % ) had recurrence of acute appendicitis during follow-up . Overall , 62 % of patients have not had an appendectomy during the follow-up period . This pilot trial suggests that nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis in children is feasible and safe and that further investigation of nonoperative treatment is warranted Introduction : The management approach for acute appendicitis has been challenged in recent years , with numerous r and omized controlled trials demonstrating that antibiotics/conservative management is an efficacious treatment , with lower complication rates . Methods : A national survey of all consultant general surgeons evaluating their practice s was performed . Reasons for changed practice s , choice of antibiotics and follow-up investigations were evaluated . In addition , the role of interval appendicectomy and conservative management in the pediatric population was also assessed . Results : The response rate for this survey was 74.7 % ( n = 74/99 ) . Over one-fifth ( n = 17 , 22.9 % ) routinely treat acute appendicitis conservatively , while another 14.8 % ( n = 11 ) consider this approach in selected cases . Main reasons for modified practice s included the presence of inflammatory phlegmon ( 75 % ) , delayed presentation ( 64 % ) , and recent evidence -based medicine developments ( 46 % ) . Co-amoxiclav/clavulanic acid was the most popular antibiotic for conservative management ( 53 % ) . Alternatively , combinations of antibiotics were also utilized . One-third felt interval appendicectomy was warranted , while one-fifth supported conservative management in the paediatric setting . The overwhelming majority ( > 95 % ) advocate follow-up colonoscopy ± computed tomography in any patient aged > 40 years managed conservatively . Conclusion : Considerable variation in management of uncomplicated appendicitis  remains in Irel and despite growing evidence suggesting that the non-operative approach is safe . Reasons for adopting a conservative management practice have been identified and reflect the exp and ing literature on this subject Acute appendicitis continues as a medical challenge with newer approaches failing to improve diagnostic accuracy . The role of antibiotics in acute nonperforative appendicitis ( NPA ) remains unclear . In 175 patients studied at two hospitals , preoperative guidelines were used to exclude perforative appendicitis . Nevertheless , 14 % of patients were found to have this condition . Surgeon 's reports significantly underestimated the diagnosis when compared with the pathologists ' reports . Antibiotic prophylaxis in 122 patients with NPA was studied prospect ively comparing ceftizoxime ( CTZ ) , cefam and ole ( CFM ) , and placebo ( PLA ) . Ceftizoxime decreased the infection rate compared with PLA ( 0 vs. 8 ; P less than .01 ) . Use of antibiotics ( CTZ or CFM ) result ed in decreased infections when compared with PLA ( 3 vs. 8 ; P less than .01 ) and fewer days of hospitalization ( 3.8 vs. 5.4 d , P less than .005 ) . Analysis of infection risk factors showed no correlations except for failure to administer antibiotics and the finding of a gangrenous appendix . Operative culture results had no predictive value for either infection or pathogen identification . It is recommended that all patients undergoing surgery for NPA be given 1 d of antibiotic prophylaxis Background Case control studies that r and omly assign patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis to either surgical or non-surgical treatment yield a relapse rate of approximately 14 % at one year . It would be useful to know the relapse rate of patients who have , instead , been selected for a given treatment based on a thorough clinical evaluation , including physical examination and laboratory results ( Alvarado Score ) as well as radiological exams if needed or deemed helpful . If this clinical evaluation is useful , the investigators would expect patient selection to be better than chance , and relapse rate to be lower than 14 % . Once the investigators have established the utility of this evaluation , the investigators can begin to identify those components that have predictive value ( such as blood analysis , or US/CT findings ) . This is the first step toward developing an accurate diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm which will avoid risks and costs of needless surgery . Methods / design This will be a single-cohort prospect i ve observational study . It will not interfere with the usual pathway , consisting of clinical examination in the Emergency Department ( ED ) and execution of the following exams at the physician 's discretion : full blood count with differential , C reactive protein , abdominal ultrasound , abdominal CT .  Patients admitted to an ED with lower abdominal pain and suspicion of acute appendicitis and not needing immediate surgery , are requested by informed consent to undergo observation and non operative treatment with antibiotic therapy ( Amoxicillin and Clavulanic Acid ) . The patients by protocol should not have received any previous antibiotic treatment during the same clinical episode . Patients not undergoing surgery will be physically examined 5 days later . Further follow-up will be conducted at 7 , 15 days , 6 months and 12 months . The study will conform to clinical practice guidelines and will follow the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki . The protocol was approved on November 2009 by Maggiore Hospital Ethical Review Board ( ID CE09079 ) . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov identifier : NCT01096927 The editors of the Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery as well as the SSAT Board of Directors have retracted the article Malik , A.A. & Bari , S.U. Conservative management of  acute appendicitis . J Gastrointest . Surg 13 , 966–970 ( 2009 ) since significant portions of the article were published earlier in the following articles : Eriksson , S. & Granstrom , L. R and omized controlled trial of appendectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis . Br J Surg 82 , 166–169 ( 1995 ) . Horton , M.D. , Counter , S.F. , Florence , M.G. & Hart , M.J. A prospect i ve trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing  appendicitis in the atypical patient . Am J Surg 179 , 379–381 ( 2000 ) INTRODUCTION Appendicitis is the most common emergency condition in children . Historically , a 3-drug regimen consisting of ampicillin , gentamicin , and clindamycin ( AGC ) has been used postoperatively for perforated appendicitis . A retrospective review at our institution has found single day dosing of ceftriaxone and metronidazole ( CM ) to be a more simple and cost-effective antibiotic strategy . Therefore , we performed a prospect i ve , r and omized trial to compare efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these 2 regimens . METHODS After internal review board approval ( IRB no. 04 12 - 149 ) , children found to have perforated appendicitis at appendectomy were r and omized to either once daily dosing of CM ( 2 total doses per day ) or st and ard dosing of AGC ( 11 total doses per day ) . Perforation was defined as an identifiable hole in the appendix . The operative approach ( laparoscopic ) , length of antibiotic use , and criteria for discharge were st and ardized for the groups . Based on our retrospective analysis using length of postoperative hospitalization as a primary end point , a sample size of 100 patients was calculated for an alpha of .5 and a power of 0.82 . RESULTS One hundred patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis . On presentation , there were no differences in sex distribution , days of symptoms , temperature , or leukocyte count . There was no difference in abscess rate or wound infections between groups . The CM group result ed in significantly less antibiotic charges then the AGC group . CONCLUSIONS Once daily dosing with the 2-drug regimen ( CM ) offers a more efficient , cost-effective antibiotic management in children with perforated appendicitis without compromising infection control when compared to a traditional 3-drug regimen A study of 130 adult patients with surgically treated gangrenous or perforated appendicitis was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of three antibiotic regimens . Forty-eight patients received cefam and ole , 40 were given the combination of clindamycin and gentamicin , and 42 were treated with cefoperazone .  Side effects from these antibiotics were infrequent and mild . When all cases were compared for infectious failure , clindamycin-gentamicin showed a clear advantage over cefam and ole . Because of the heterogeneity of the total study population , patients with perforation and peritonitis were compared separately . This analysis confirmed the advantage of clindamycin-gentamicin over cefam and ole . In addition , it appears that clindamycin-gentamicin is more efficacious than cefoperazone BACKGROUND The management of an appendiceal mass remains controversial with 2 schools of thought ; early surgical intervention vs nonoperative management with or without interval appendectomy . The aim is to determine the role and safety of early laparoscopic appendectomy ( LA ) in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass . METHODS This is a prospect i ve study of 88 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent attempted LA for suspected acute appendicitis at KK Women 's and Children 's Hospital , Singapore , between May and October 2003 . RESULTS A total of 88 patients with a mean age of 10 + /- 3 years ( range , 3 - 16 years ) underwent LA for an appendiceal mass ( n = 22 ) , simple appendicitis ( n = 36 ) , other complicated ( gangrenous or perforated ) appendicitis ( n = 23 ) , and a normal appendix ( n = 7 ) . There were 7 conversions to  open appendicectomy  , 3 of which occurred in patients with an appendiceal mass . There were no perioperative or postoperative mortalities . Morbidity occurred in only one patient who underwent LA for perforated appendicitis . He had prolonged sepsis that resolved after 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics . None of the patients with an appendiceal mass developed complications . Patients who underwent early LA for an appendiceal mass had a statistically significant ( P < .05 ) longer operating time ( median , 103 minutes ; interquartile range , 90 - 151 minutes , vs median , 87 minutes ; interquartile range , 71 - 112 minutes ) , prolonged time to ambulation ( median , 2.0 days ; interquartile range , 2 - 2.5 days , vs median , 1.0 days ; interquartile , 1 - 2 days ) , increased time to resumption of diet ( median , 4 days ; interquartile , 3 - 5 days , vs median , 2 days ; interquartile , 2 - 3 days ) , and longer postoperative stay ( median , 6.0 days ; interquartile , 5.5 - 6.5 days , vs median , 4.0 days ; interquartile , 3 - 5.5 days ) compared with patients presenting with appendicitis without mass formation . However , there was no statistical difference in these parameters when LA for an appendiceal mass was compared with LA for other complicated appendicitis ( perforated and gangrenous ) . CONCLUSION Although early LA for an appendiceal mass is a technically dem and ing procedure , it can be performed safely in children with minimal morbidity and mortality . In an era where patients ' dem and for " key-hole " surgery is rising , early LA is a safe and viable option in the management of children with an appendiceal mass . It also offers the advantage of avoiding misdiagnoses and the need for a second hospitalization PURPOSE We instituted a clinical pathway for the care of patients with perforated appendicitis based on outcomes from several clinical trials . The objective of this study was to review effects on re source utilization with this protocol . METHODS A retrospective review was conducted to compare all patients undergoing appendectomy during initial admission for perforated appendicitis prior to the pathway ( July 2001 to December 2003 ) to after ( December 2008 to March 2011 ) . Demographics and management strategies were evaluated . RESULTS Charts of 151 patients prior to and 259 after the start of the pathway were review ed . The percentage of patients leaving the operating room with a nasogastric tube ( NGT )  was significantly lower in the after-group , while similar numbers of patients during each period had a NGT placed on the floor . The proportion of patients receiving peripherally inserted central catheters and total parenteral nutrition , and the number of intravenous antibiotics per day and lab draws were significantly reduced with the protocol . Patients were started on a regular diet significantly earlier , and length of stay was shortened by more than one day . CONCLUSION The evidence -based clinical pathway developed from prospect i ve trials has drastically reduced re source utilization for children with perforated appendicitis BACKGROUND Initial antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis has been shown to be safe in adults ; so far , not much is known about the safety and efficacy of this treatment in children . The aims of this study were to investigate the feasibility of a r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) evaluating initial antibiotic treatment for acute appendectomy in children with acute simple appendicitis and to evaluate the safety of this approach . METHODS In a multicenter , prospect i ve cohort study patients aged 7 - 17 years with a radiologically confirmed simple appendicitis were eligible .  Intravenous antibiotics ( amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 250/25 mg/kg 4 times daily ; maximum 6,000/600 mg/d and gentamicin 7 mg/kg once daily ) were administered for 48 - 72 hours . Clinical reevaluation every 6 hours , daily blood sample s , and  ultrasound follow-up  after 48 hours was performed . In case of improvement after 48 hours , oral antibiotics were given for a total of 7 days . At any time , in case of clinical deterioration or non-improvement after 72 hours , an appendectomy could be performed . Follow-up continued until 8 weeks after discharge . Adverse events were defined as major complications of antibiotic treatment , such as allergic reactions , perforated appendicitis , and recurrent appendicitis . RESULTS Of 44 eligible patients , 25 participated ( inclusion rate , 57 % ; 95 % CI , 42%-70 % ) . Delayed appendectomy was performed in 2 , and the other 23 were without symptoms at the 8 weeks follow-up . Minor complications occurred in three patients . None of the patients suffered from an adverse event or a recurrent appendicitis . CONCLUSION Our study shows that an RCT comparing initial antibiotic treatment strategy with urgent appendectomy is feasible in children ; the intervention seems to be safe BACKGROUND The use of antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis in children , remains the area of controversy . The aim of the study was to assess the necessity of antibiotic administration in nonperforated appendicitis in children . MATERIAL AND METHODS The design of the study was a double blind r and omized controlled trial , with a follow-up of 4 to 20 months . SETTING Surgical Department in a University Pediatric Hospital . PATIENTS One hundred and eighty seven out of 249 children subjected to emergency appendectomies met the inclusion criteria , with 35 eligible but not included in the study . The remaining 152 patients were r and omized ; 41 had complicated appendicitis , 3 other diagnosis , 108 were analyzed within 3 study groups : 1 ( n = 31 ) no antibiotic , 2 ( n = 41 ) one dose , 3 ( n = 36 ) 5-day course . Open appendectomy was a surgical procedure and Ceftriaxone 1.0 g i.v . was administered . Investigated parameters were : body temperature , WBC , bowel sounds , wound healing , recovery and morbidity . RESULTS Valid outcome data were available for 90 of 108 r and omized patients . Protocol s of 18 children due to fever > 39 degrees C , upper airway infection or allergy were disclosed . In the remaining 90 children , there were no differences in WBC and oral feeding between groups 1 ( n = 24 ) , 2 ( n = 35 ) and 3 ( n = 31 ) . Group 1 and 2 had a higher mean temperature on day 1 post-op , without any clinical significance . A higher mean temperature was noted on day 5 post-op in group 1 , due to wound infection in one patient . There were no intraabdominal abscesses . The only other complications were 2 adhesion small bowel obstructions ( in groups 1 and 2 each ) . CONCLUSION Routine use of antibiotics in nonperforated appendicitis in children is not necessary An increasing amount of evidence supports antibiotic therapy for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis . The objective of this study was to compare the costs of antibiotics alone  versus  appendicectomy  in treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis within the r and omized controlled APPAC ( APPendicitis ACuta ) trial
The need for crossover in management and recurrent appendicitis were low among all studies .
For those patients who ultimately required surgery , no increased complications were observed .
Antibiotics may be safely recommended in patients with high surgical risk , such as the elderly or those with multiple comorbidities
AIM To review outcomes of  surgical and antibiotic management of acute appendicitis .