Enhancing the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education: the diabetes literacy project. Effectiveness of educational interventions to promote oral hypoglycaemic adherence in adults with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis. Predictors of Mortality Over 8 Years in Type 2 Diabetic Patients The ADDITION-Cambridge trial protocol: a cluster – randomised controlled trial of screening for type 2 diabetes and intensive treatment for screen-detected patients Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: a randomized controlled trial. Impact of an education program on patient anxiety, depression, glycemic control, and adherence to self-care and medication in Type 2 diabetes Diabetes Self-Management Education: Miles to Go Mobile App-Based Interventions to Support Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Identify Functions Associated with Glycemic Efficacy The Diabetes Manual trial protocol – a cluster randomized controlled trial of a self-management intervention for type 2 diabetes [ISRCTN06315411] Randomised controlled trial of an automated, interactive telephone intervention to improve type 2 diabetes self-management (Telephone-Linked Care Diabetes Project): study protocol Effectiveness of self-management promotion educational program among diabetic patients based on health belief model Patients' education, and its impact on care outcomes, resource consumption and working conditions: data from the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS). Assessment of the function and effect of diabetes education programs in Taiwan. Community-based care for the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis. Nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial Impact of a self-care education programme on patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in the Basque Country A Church-based Diabetes Self-management Education Program for African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes [Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary health care and outpatient community settings]. Therapeutic education among adults with type 2 diabetes: effects of a three-day intervention on perceived competence, self-management behaviours and glycaemic control Diabetes, diabetes treatment and breast cancer prognosis Self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-care behaviour in people with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan. Cost-effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus managed without insulin
Patient empowerment through self-management education is central to improving the quality of diabetes care and preventing Type 2 Diabetes .  Although national programs exist , there is no EU-wide strategy for diabetes self-management education , and patients with limited literacy face barriers to effective self-management . The Diabetes Literacy project , initiated with the support of the European Commission , aims to fill this gap . The project investigates the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education , targeting people with or at risk of Type 2 Diabetes in the 28 EU Member States , as part of a comprehensive EU-wide diabetes strategy . National diabetes strategies in the EU , US , Taiwan , and Israel are compared , and diabetes self-management programs inventorized . The costs of the diabetes care pathway are assessed on a per person basis at national level . A comparison is made of the (cost)-effectiveness of different methods for diabetes self-management support , and the moderating role of health literacy , organization of the health services , and implementation fidelity of education programs are considered . Web-based material s are developed and evaluated by r and omized trials to evaluate if interactive internet delivery can enhance self-management support for people with lower levels of health literacy . The 3-year project started in December 2012 . Several literature review s have been produced and protocol development and research design are in the final stages . Primary and secondary data collection and analysis take place in 2014 . The results will inform policy decisions on improving the prevention , treatment , and care for persons with diabetes across literacy levels Executive summary Background As a chronic condition , the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide and adherence to oral medications , an essential component of self‐management , has been shown to improve glycaemic control . However compliance with oral medication adherence remains poor . Educating people with Type 2 diabetes is an important strategy to enhance self‐management ability , including medication‐taking behaviour . Objectives The overall objective of the review was to determine the effectiveness of educational interventions to promote oral hypoglycaemic adherence in adults with Type 2 diabetes . Inclusion criteria Types of participants Studies involving adults over 18 years old with Type 2 diabetes , with or without co‐morbidities , currently taking oral hypoglycaemic medication without insulin treatment , and with aglycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) > 7.0 % prior to the intervention were considered . Aglycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) concentration of less than 7.0 % , is important in order to delay or prevent diabetes‐related complications . Participants could be from the primary , tertiary or acute care setting . Types of intervention The review focused on various forms of educational interventions delivered by healthcare professionals aim ed at improving participants ’ knowledge . Types of outcomes The review evaluated outcomes measuring oral hypoglycaemic adherence including HbA1c , fasting blood glucose levels and other relevant indicators . Types of studies Studies that were r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) or case‐control studies were considered . Search strategy A three‐stage search strategy was employed . Papers in English and between the years 1990‐2009 were search ed in the following data bases : CINAHL , Medline , Mosby 's Nursing Consult , PsycINFO , PubMed , ScienceDirect , Scopus , TRIP and Web of Science . Full text was retrieved when the titles and abstract s of studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria . Method ological quality Full papers were assessed for method ological quality independently by two review ers using critical appraisal checklists from the Joanna Briggs Institute ( JBI ) . A third review er was consulted whenever there were disagreements between the two review ers . Data collection / extraction Details of each study included in the review were extracted using st and ardized data extraction forms developed by JBI . Extraction was conducted independently by two review ers . Data synthesis Meta‐ analysis was not possible due to method ological and statistical heterogeneity of the included studies . Hence study findings are presented in narrative form . Results Seven studies included in the final review consisted of seven RCTs . Five studies concluded that the educational intervention was effective in promoting oral hypoglycaemic adherence compared to usual care . These included pharmacist‐led interventions , individual diabetes education provided by nurses and diabetes group education based on a self‐management approach . Similarities among these interventions were provision of information on oral hypoglycaemic medication and the need for regular education sessions . However , small sample s in some studies limited generalization of results . Conclusions Implication s for practice Increased knowledge of oral hypoglycaemic issues and reinforcement of the importance of medication adherence were useful in promoting adherence . Regular education sessions allow individuals to reinforce information and educators to identify barriers to medication adherence . Educational interventions focusing on self‐management strategies appear more likely to achieve positive outcomes . Implication s for research Further trials involving larger sample s and population s with poor glycaemic control are needed . The effects of educational interventions , influence of additional take‐home written material , the optimal interval length of follow‐up and duration of education sessions , and specific processes of individual or group education which have been identified as effective need further exploration UNLABELLED In June 2008 , the Medical Advisory Secretariat began work on the Diabetes Strategy Evidence Project , an evidence -based review of the literature surrounding strategies for successful management and treatment of diabetes . This project came about when the Health System Strategy Division at the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care subsequently asked the secretariat to provide an evidentiary platform for the Ministry 's newly released Diabetes Strategy .After an initial review of the strategy and consultation with experts , the secretariat identified five key areas in which evidence was needed . Evidence -based analyses have been prepared for each of these five areas : insulin pumps , behavioural interventions , bariatric surgery , home telemonitoring , and community based care . For each area , an economic analysis was completed where appropriate and is described in a separate report . To review these titles within the Diabetes Strategy Evidence series , please visit the Medical Advisory Secretariat Web site , http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/mas_about.html,DIABETES STRATEGY EVIDENCE PLATFORM : Summary of Evidence -Based AnalysesContinuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetics : An Evidence -Based Analysis Behavioural Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes : An Evidence -Based Analysis  BARIATRIC SURGERY FOR PEOPLE WITH DIABETES AND MORBID OBESITY : An Evidence -Based Summary Community-Based Care for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes : An Evidence -Based Analysis Home Telemonitoring for Type 2 Diabetes : An Evidence -Based Analysis Application of the Ontario Diabetes Economic Model ( ODEM ) to Determine the Cost-effectiveness and Budget Impact of Selected Type 2 Diabetes Interventions in Ontario OBJECTIVE The objective of this report is to determine whether behavioural interventions are effective in improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes . BACKGROUND Diabetes is a serious chronic condition affecting millions of people worldwide and is the sixth leading cause of death in Canada . In 2005 , an estimated 8.8 % of Ontario 's population had diabetes , representing more than 816,000 Ontarians . The direct health care cost of diabetes was $ 1.76 billion in the year 2000 and is projected to rise to a total cost of $ 3.14 billion by 2016 . Much of this cost arises from the serious long-term complications associated with the disease including : coronary heart disease , stroke , adult blindness , limb amputations and kidney disease . Type 2 diabetes accounts for 90 - 95 % of diabetes and while type 2 diabetes is more prevalent in people aged 40 years and older , prevalence in younger population s is increasing due to a rise in obesity and physical inactivity in children . Data from the United Kingdom Prospect i ve Diabetes Study ( UKPDS ) has shown that tight glycemic control can significantly reduce the risk of developing serious complications in type 2 diabetics . Despite physicians ' and patients ' knowledge of the importance of glycemic control , Canadian data has shown that only 38 % of patients with diabetes have HbA1C levels in the optimal range of 7 % or less . This statistic highlights the complexities involved in the management of diabetes , which is characterized by extensive patient involvement in addition to the support provided by physicians . An enormous dem and is , therefore , placed on patients to self-manage the physical , emotional and psychological aspects of living with a chronic illness . Despite differences in individual needs to cope with diabetes , there is general agreement for the necessity of supportive programs for patient self-management . While traditional programs were didactic models with the goal of improving patients ' knowledge of their disease , current models focus on behavioural approaches aim ed at providing patients with the skills and strategies required to promote and change their behaviour . Several meta-analyses and systematic review s have demonstrated improved health outcomes with  self-management support programs in type 2 diabetics . They have all , however , either looked at a specific component of self-management support programs ( i.e. self-management education ) or have been conducted in specific population s. Most review s are also qualitative and do not clearly define the interventions of interest , making findings difficult to interpret . Moreover , heterogeneity in the interventions has led to conflicting evidence on the components of effective programs . There is thus much uncertainty regarding the optimal design and delivery of these programs by policymakers . EVIDENCE -BASED ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS : RESEARCH QUESTIONS Are behavioural interventions  effective in improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes?Is the effectiveness of the intervention impacted by intervention characteristics ( e.g. delivery of intervention , length of intervention , mode of instruction , interventionist etc . ) ? INCLUSION CRITERIA English Language Published between January 1996 to August 2008 Type 2 diabetic adult population ( > 18 years)R and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) Systematic review s , or meta-analyses Describing a multi-faceted self-management support intervention as defined by the 2007 Self-Management Mapping Guide (1)Reporting outcomes of glycemic control ( HbA1c ) with extractable data Studies with a minimum of 6-month follow up EXCLUSION CRITERIA Studies with a control group other than usual care Studies with a sample size < 30 Studies without a clearly defined intervention OUTCOMES OF INTEREST PRIMARY OUTCOME glycemic control ( HbA1c ) SECONDARY OUTCOMES systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) control , lipid control , change in smoking status , weight change , quality of life , knowledge , self-efficacy , managing psychosocial aspects of diabetes , assessing dissatisfaction and readiness to change , and setting and achieving diabetes goals . SEARCH STRATEGY A search was performed in OVID MEDLINE , MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations , EMBASE , the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature ( CINAHL ) , The Cochrane Library , and the International Agency for Health Technology Assessment ( INAHTA ) for studies published between January 1996 and August 2008 . Abstract s were review ed by a single author and studies meeting the inclusion criteria outlined above were obtained . Data on population characteristics , glycemic control outcomes , and study design were extracted . Reference lists were also checked for relevant studies . The quality of the evidence was assessed as being either high , moderate , low , or very low according to the GRADE methodology . SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The search identified 638 citations published between 1996 and August 2008 , of which 12 met the inclusion criteria and one was a meta- analysis ( Gary et al. 2003 ) . The remaining 11 studies were RCTs ( 9 were used in the meta- analysis ) and only one was defined as small ( total sample size N=47 ) . SUMMARY OF PARTICIPANT DEMOGRAPHICS ACROSS STUDIES : A total of 2,549 participants were included in the 11 identified studies . The mean age of participants reported was approximately 58 years and the mean duration of diabetes was approximately 6 years . Most studies reported gender with a mean percentage of females of approximately 67 % . Of the eleven studies , two focused only on women and four included only Hispanic individuals . All studies evaluated type 2 diabetes patients exclusively . STUDY CHARACTERISTICS : The studies were conducted between 2002 and 2008 . Approximately six of 11 studies were carried out within the USA , with the remaining studies conducted in the UK , Sweden , and Israel ( sample size ranged from 47 to 824 participants ) . The quality of the studies ranged from moderate to low with four of the studies being of moderate quality and the remaining seven of low quality ( based on the Consort Checklist ) . Differences in quality were mainly due to method ological issues such as inadequate description of r and omization , sample size calculation allocation concealment , blinding and uncertainty of the use of intention-to-treat ( ITT ) analysis . Patients were recruited from several setting s : six studies from primary or general medical practice s , three studies from the community ( e.g. via advertisements ) , and two from outpatient diabetes clinics . A usual care control group was reported in nine of 11 of the studies and two studies reported some type of minimal diabetes care in addition to usual care for the control group . INTERVENTION CHARACTERISTICS : All of the interventions examined in the studies were mapped to the 2007 Self-management Mapping Guide . The interventions most often focused on problem solving , goal setting and encouraging participants to engage in activities that protect and promote health ( e.g. modifying behaviour , change in diet , and increase physical activity ) . All of the studies examined comprehensive interventions targeted at least two self-care topics ( e.g. diet , physical activity , blood glucose monitoring , foot care , etc . ) . Despite the homogeneity in the aims of the interventions , there was substantial clinical heterogeneity in other intervention characteristics such as duration , intensity , setting , mode of delivery ( group vs. individual ) , interventionist , and outcomes of interest ( discussed below ) . DURATION , INTENSITY AND MODE OF DELIVERY : Intervention duration s ranged from 2 days to 1 year , with many falling into the range of 6 to 10 weeks . The rest of the interventions fell into categories of ≤ 2 weeks ( 2 studies ) , 6 months ( 2 studies ) , or 1 year ( 3 studies ) . Intensity of the interventions varied widely from 6 hours over 2 days , to 52 hours over 1 year ; however , the majority consisted of interventions of 6 to 15 hours . Both individual and group sessions were used to deliver interventions . Group counselling was used in five studies as a mode of instruction , three studies used both individual and group sessions , and one study used individual sessions as its sole mode of instruction . ( ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To examine demographic , socioeconomic , and biological risk factors for all-cause , cardiovascular , and noncardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes over 8 years and to construct mortality prediction equations . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Beginning in 2000 , survey and medical record information was obtained from 8,334 participants in Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes ( TRIAD ) , a multicenter prospect i ve observational study of diabetes care in managed care . The National Death Index was search ed annually to obtain data on deaths over an 8-year follow-up period ( 2000–2007 ) . Predictors examined included age , sex , race , education , income , smoking , age at diagnosis of diabetes , duration and treatment of diabetes , BMI , complications , comorbidities , and medication use . RESULTS There were 1,616 ( 19 % ) deaths over the 8-year period . In the most parsimonious equation , the predictors of all-cause mortality included older age , male sex , white race , lower income , smoking , insulin treatment , nephropathy , history of dyslipidemia , higher LDL cholesterol , angina/myocardial infa rct ion/other coronary disease/coronary angioplasty/bypass , congestive heart failure , aspirin , β-blocker , and diuretic use , and higher Charlson Index . CONCLUSIONS Risk of death can be predicted in people with type 2 diabetes using simple demographic , socioeconomic , and biological risk factors with fair reliability . Such prediction equations are essential for computer simulation models of diabetes progression and may , with further validation , be useful for patient management Background The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes poses a major public health challenge . Population -based screening and early treatment for type 2 diabetes could reduce this growing burden . However , the benefits of such a strategy remain uncertain . Methods and design The ADDITION-Cambridge study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ( i ) a stepwise screening strategy for type 2 diabetes ; and ( ii ) intensive multifactorial treatment for people with screen-detected diabetes in primary care . 63 practice s in the East Anglia region participated . Three undertook the pilot study , 33 were allocated to three groups : no screening ( control ) , screening followed by intensive treatment ( IT ) and screening plus routine care ( RC ) in an unbalanced ( 1:3:3 ) r and omisation . The remaining 27 practice s were r and omly allocated to IT and RC . A risk score incorporating routine practice data was used to identify people aged 40–69 years at high-risk of undiagnosed diabetes . In the screening practice s , high-risk individuals were invited to take part in a stepwise screening programme . In the IT group , diabetes treatment is optimised through guidelines , target-led multifactorial treatment , audit , feedback , and academic detailing for practice teams , alongside provision of educational material s for newly diagnosed participants . Primary endpoints are modelled cardiovascular risk at one year , and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity at five years after diagnosis of diabetes . Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality , development of renal and visual impairment , peripheral neuropathy , health service costs , self-reported quality of life , functional status and health utility . Impact of the screening programme at the population level is also assessed through measures of mortality , cardiovascular morbidity , health status and health service use among high-risk individuals . Discussion ADDITION-Cambridge is conducted in a defined high-risk group accessible through primary care . It addresses the feasibility of population -based screening for diabetes , as well as the benefits and costs of screening and intensive multifactorial treatment early in the disease trajectory . The intensive treatment algorithm is based on evidence from studies including individuals with clinical ly diagnosed diabetes and the education material s are informed by psychological theory . ADDITION-Cambridge will provide timely evidence concerning the benefits of early intensive treatment and will inform policy decisions concerning screening for type 2 diabetes . Trial registration Current Controlled trials IS RCT Patients in a low-income community health center with Type 2 diabetes ( N = 81 ) taking a one-day education workshop  as part of their diabetes medical management were r and omly assigned either to education alone or to a combination of education and acceptance and commitment therapy ( ACT ) . Both groups were taught how to manage their diabetes , but those in the ACT condition also learned to apply acceptance and mindfulness skills to difficult diabetes-related thoughts and feelings . Compared with patients who received education alone , after 3 months those in the ACT condition were more likely to use these coping strategies , to report better diabetes self-care , and to have glycated hemoglobin ( HbA-sub(1C ) ) values in the target range . Mediational analyses indicated that changes in acceptance coping and self-management behavior mediated the impact of treatment on changes in HbA-sub(1C ) Background : Diabetes mellitus ( DM ) requires continuous medical care , patients ’ self-management , education , and adherence to prescribed medication to reduce the risk of long-term complications . The aim of this study was to assess the benefits of an education program on diabetes , patient self-management , adherence to medication , anxiety , depression and glycemic control in type 2 diabetics in Saudi Arabia . Material s and Methods : This was a prospect i ve study , conducted among 104 diabetic patients at a major tertiary hospital in Riyadh , Saudi Arabia , between May 2011 and October 2012 .  Education material s given to diabetic patients included pamphlets/h and outs written in Arabic , the national language . Special videotapes about DM were made and distributed to all participants . In addition , specific educational programs through the diabetes educators and one-on-one counseling sessions with the doctor were also arranged . Patients were interviewed using a structured interview schedule both during the baseline , and after 6 months of the program . The interview schedule included , socio-demographics , clinical characteristics , diabetes self-management , adherence to medication , anxiety , and depression . Glycemic control was considered poor , if hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) was ≥ 7 % . Results : The mean age of the study population was 57.3 ± 14.4 years . Seventy one were males ( 68.3 % ) and 33 ( 31.7 % ) were females . After six months of the diabetes education program , there were significant improvements in patients ’ dietary plan ( P = 0.0001 ) , physical exercise ( P = 0.0001 ) , self-monitoring of blood glucose ( SMBG ) ( P = 0.0001 ) , HbA1c ( P = 0.04 ) , adherence to medication ( P = 0.007 ) , and depression ( P = 0.03 ) . Conclusions : Implementation of education programs on diabetes among type 2 diabetic patients is associated with better outcomes such as their dietary plan , physical exercise , SMBG , adherence to medication , HbA1c and depression This meta- analysis assessed how successfully Diabetes Self-Management Education ( DSME ) interventions help people with type 2 diabetes achieve and maintain healthy blood glucose levels . We included 52 DSME programs with 9,631 participants that reported post-intervention A1c levels in r and omized controlled trials . The training conditions result ed in significant reductions in A1c levels compared to control conditions . However , the impact of intervention was modest shifting of only 7.23 % more participants from diabetic to pre-diabetic or normal status , relative to the control condition . Most intervention participants did not achieve healthy A1c levels . Further , few DSME studies assessed long-term maintenance of A1c gains . Past trends suggest that gains are difficult to sustain over time . Our results suggested that interventions delivered by nurses were more successful than those delivered by non-nursing personnel . We suggest that DSME programs might do better by going beyond procedural interventions . Most DSME programs relied heavily on rules and procedures to guide decisions about diet , exercise , and weight loss . Future DSME may need to include cognitive self-monitoring , diagnosis , and planning skills to help patients detect anomalies , identify possible causes , generate corrective action , and avoid future barriers to maintaining healthy A1c levels . Finally , comprehensive descriptions of DSME programs would advance future efforts Background Mobile health apps for diabetes self-management have different functions . However , the efficacy and safety of each function are not well studied , and no classification is available for these functions . Objective The aims of this study were to ( 1 ) develop and vali date a taxonomy of apps for diabetes self-management , ( 2 ) investigate the glycemic efficacy of  mobile app-based interventions among adults with diabetes in a systematic review of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) , and ( 3 ) explore the contribution of different function to the effectiveness of entire app-based interventions using the taxonomy . Methods We developed a 3-axis taxonomy with columns of clinical modules , rows of functional modules and cells of functions with risk assessment s. This taxonomy was vali date d by review ing and classifying commercially available diabetes apps . We search ed MEDLINE , EMBASE , the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials , the Chinese Biomedical Literature Data base , and Clinical Trials.gov from January 2007 to May 2016 . We included RCTs of adult out patients with diabetes that compared using  mobile app-based interventions with usual care alone . The mean differences ( MDs ) in hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) concentrations and risk ratios of adverse events were pooled using a r and om-effects meta- analysis . After taxonomic classification , we performed exploratory subgroup analyses of the presence or absence of each module across the included app-based interventions . Results Across 12 included trials involving 974 participants , using app-based interventions was associated with a clinical ly significant reduction of HbA1c ( MD 0.48 % , 95 % CI 0.19%-0.78 % ) without excess adverse events . Larger HbA1c reductions were noted among patients with type 2 diabetes than those with type 1 diabetes ( MD 0.67 % , 95 % CI 0.30%-1.03 % vs MD 0.37 % , 95 % CI –0.12%-0.86 % ) . Having a complication prevention module in app-based interventions was associated with a greater HbA1c reduction ( with complication prevention : MD 1.31 % , 95 % CI 0.66%-1.96 % vs without : MD 0.38 % , 95 % CI 0.09%-0.67 % ; intersubgroup P=.01 ) , as was having a structured display ( with structured display : MD 0.69 % , 95 % CI 0.32%-1.06 % vs without : MD 0.69 % , 95 % CI –0.18%-0.53 % ; intersubgroup P=.03 ) . However , having a clinical decision-making function was not associated with a larger HbA1c reduction ( with clinical decision making : MD 0.19 % , 95 % CI –0.24%-0.63 % vs without : MD 0.61 % , 95 % CI 0.27%-0.95 % ; intersubgroup P=.14 ) . Conclusions The use of mobile app-based interventions yields a clinical ly significant HbA1c reduction among adult out patients with diabetes , especially among those with type 2 diabetes . Our study suggests that the clinical decision-making function needs further improvement and evaluation before being added to apps Background The Diabetes Manual is a type 2 diabetes self-management programme based upon the clinical ly effective ' Heart Manual ' . The 12 week programme is a complex intervention theoretically underpinned by self-efficacy theory . It is a one to one intervention meeting United Kingdom requirements for structured diabetes-education and is delivered within routine primary care . Methods / design In a two-group cluster r and omized controlled trial , GP practice s are allocated by computer minimisation to an intervention group or a six-month deferred intervention group . We aim to recruit 250 participants from 50 practice s across central Engl and . Eligibility criteria are adults able to undertake the programme with type 2 diabetes , not taking insulin , with HbA1c over 8 % ( first 12 months ) and following an agreed protocol change over 7 % ( months 13 to 18 ) . Following r and omisation , intervention nurses receive two-day training and delivered the Diabetes Manual programme to participants . Deferred intervention nurses receive the training following six-month follow-up . Primary outcome is HbA1c with total and HDL cholesterol ; blood pressure , body mass index ; self-efficacy and quality of life as additional outcomes . Primary analysis is between-group HbA1c differences at 6 months powered to give 80 % power to detect a difference in HbA1c of 0.6 % . A 12 month cohort analysis will assess maintenance of effect and assess relationship between self-efficacy and outcomes , and a qualitative study is running alongside . Discussion This trial incorporates educational and psychological diabetes interventions into a single programme and assesses both clinical and psychosocial outcomes . The trial will increase our underst and ing of intervention transferability between conditions , those diabetes related health behaviours that are more or less susceptible to change through efficacy enhancing mechanisms and how this impacts on clinical outcomes Background An estimated 285 million people worldwide have diabetes and its prevalence is predicted to increase to 439 million by 2030 . For the year 2010 , it is estimated that 3.96 million excess deaths in the age group 20 - 79 years are attributable to diabetes around the world . Self-management is recognised as an integral part of diabetes care . This paper describes the protocol of a r and omised controlled trial of an automated interactive telephone system aim ing to improve the uptake and maintenance of essential diabetes self-management behaviours . Methods / Design A total of 340 individuals with type 2 diabetes will be r and omised , either to the routine care arm , or to the intervention arm in which participants receive the  Telephone-Linked Care ( TLC ) Diabetes program in addition to their routine care . The intervention requires the participants to telephone the TLC Diabetes phone system weekly for 6 months . They receive the study h and book and a glucose meter linked to a data uploading device . The TLC system consists of a computer with software design ed to provide monitoring , tailored feedback and education on key aspects of diabetes self-management , based on answers voiced or entered during the current or previous conversations . Data collection is conducted at baseline ( Time 1 ) , 6-month follow-up ( Time 2 ) , and 12-month follow-up ( Time 3 ) . The primary outcomes are glycaemic control ( HbA1c ) and quality of life ( Short Form-36 Health Survey version 2 ) . Secondary outcomes include anthropometric measures , blood pressure , blood lipid profile , psychosocial measures as well as measures of diet , physical activity , blood glucose monitoring , foot care and medication taking . Information on utilisation of healthcare services including hospital admissions , medication use and costs is collected . An economic evaluation is also planned . Discussion Outcomes will provide evidence concerning the efficacy of a telephone-linked care intervention for self-management of diabetes . Furthermore , the study will provide insight into the potential for more widespread uptake of automated telehealth interventions , globally . Trial Registration Introduction : Diabetes is a chronic disease ; it can cause serious complications . Diabetes self-management is essential for prevention of disease complications . This study was conducted to evaluate self-management promotion educational program intervention efficiency among diabetic patients in Iran and health belief model ( HBM ) was applied as a theoretical framework . Material s and Methods : Overall , 120 Type 2 diabetic patients referred to rural health centers in Gachsaran , Iran participated in this study as r and omly divided into intervention and control group . This was a longitudinal r and omized pre- and post-test series control group design panel study to implement a behavior modification based intervention to promotion self-management among diabetic patients . Cross-tabulation and t-test by using SPSS statistical package , version 16 was used for the statistical analysis . Results : Mean age was 55.07 years ( SD = 9.94 , range : 30 - 70 ) . Our result shows significant improvements in average response for susceptibility , severity , benefit and self-management among intervention group . Additionally , after intervention , average response of the barrier to self-management was decreased among intervention group . Conclusion : Our result showed education program based on HBM was improve of self-management and seems implementing these programs can be effective in the and prevention of diabetes complications AIM To evaluate the impact of diabetes education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) in non-controlled studies ( " real-world conditions " ) on quality of care , re source consumption and conditions of employment . METHODS This cross-sectional study and longitudinal follow-up describe the data ( demographic and socioeconomic profiles , clinical characteristics , treatment of hyperglycaemia and associated cardiovascular risk factors , re source consumption ) collected during the second phase ( 2006 ) of the International Diabetes Management Practice s Study ( IDMPS ) . Patients received diabetes education directly from the practice nurse , dietitian or educator , or were referred to ad hoc group-education programmes ; all programmes emphasized healthy lifestyle changes , self-care and active participation in disease control and treatment . Educated vs non-educated T2DM patients ( n=5692 in each group ) , paired by age , gender and diabetes duration , were r and omly recruited for the IDMPS by participating primary -care physicians from 27 countries in Eastern Europe , Asia , Latin America and Africa . Outcome measures included clinical ( body weight , height , waist circumference , blood pressure , foot evaluation ) , metabolic ( HbA(1c ) levels , blood lipid profile ) and biochemical control measures . Treatment goals were defined according to American Diabetes Association guidelines . RESULTS T2DM patients ' education significantly improved the percentage of patients achieving target values set by international guidelines . Educated patients increased their insulin use and self-care performance , had a lower rate of chronic complications and a modest increase in cost of care , and probably higher salaries and slightly better productivity . CONCLUSION Diabetes education is an efficient tool for improving care outcomes without having a major impact on healthcare costs A multi-center prospect i ve study was conducted to assess the function and impact of diabetic education programs on diabetic control . A total of 208 subjects with type 2 diabetes were recruited .  Diabetes self-care , assessed by question naire , was evaluated before , and 4 months after attending a diabetes education course . A total of 121 subjects who received advanced diabetes education courses  were design ated as the experimental group . A second group of 87 cases receiving a basic course  served as controls . In addition to basic knowledge , the advanced education programs included  dietary control , blood glucose monitoring , management of hypoglycemia , medication compliance , foot care and exercise . Diabetes self-care techniques were significantly improved in the experimental group . The overall score for diabetes self-care techniques improved in both groups at the 4th month over baseline values . The change was significant with the controls ' ( P < 0.001 ) . Multiple regression analysis confirmed the intensity of diabetic education was the only significant variable correlated with the decrease of fasting blood glucose and systolic blood pressure . In conclusion , integrated and intensive diabetes education program in diabetes education centers provides an effective method for improving diabetes self-care techniques and metabolic outcome UNLABELLED In June 2008 , the Medical Advisory Secretariat began work on the Diabetes Strategy Evidence Project , an evidence -based review of the literature surrounding strategies for successful management and treatment of diabetes . This project came about when the Health System Strategy Division at the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care subsequently asked the secretariat to provide an evidentiary platform for the Ministry 's newly released Diabetes Strategy .After an initial review of the strategy and consultation with experts , the secretariat identified five key areas in which evidence was needed . Evidence -based analyses have been prepared for each of these five areas : insulin pumps , behavioural interventions , bariatric surgery , home telemonitoring , and community based care . For each area , an economic analysis was completed where appropriate and is described in a separate report . To review these titles within the Diabetes Strategy Evidence series , please visit the Medical Advisory Secretariat Web site , http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/mas_about.html,DIABETES STRATEGY EVIDENCE PLATFORM : Summary of Evidence -Based AnalysesContinuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetics : An Evidence -Based Analysis Behavioural Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes : An Evidence -Based Analysis BARIATRIC SURGERY FOR PEOPLE WITH DIABETES AND MORBID OBESITY : An Evidence -Based Summary Community-Based Care for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes : An Evidence -Based Analysis Home Telemonitoring for Type 2 Diabetes  : An Evidence -Based Analysis Application of the Ontario Diabetes Economic Model ( ODEM ) to Determine the Cost-effectiveness and Budget Impact of Selected Type 2 Diabetes Interventions in Ontario OBJECTIVE The objective of this report is to determine the efficacy of specialized multidisciplinary community care for the management of type 2 diabetes compared to usual care . CLINICAL NEED TARGET POPULATION AND CONDITION Diabetes ( i.e. diabetes mellitus ) is a highly prevalent chronic metabolic disorder that interferes with the body 's ability to produce or effectively use insulin . The majority ( 90 % ) of diabetes patients have type 2 diabetes . ( 1 ) Based on the United Kingdom Prospect i ve Diabetes Study ( UKPDS ) , intensive blood glucose and blood pressure control significantly reduce the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetics . While many studies have documented that patients often do not meet the glycemic control targets specified by national and international guidelines , factors associated with glycemic control are less well studied , one of which is the provider(s ) of care . Multidisciplinary approaches to care may be particularly important for diabetes management . According guidelines from the Canadian Diabetes Association ( CDA ) , the diabetes health care team should be multi- and interdisciplinary . Presently in Ontario , the core diabetes health care team consists of at least a family physician and /or diabetes specialist , and diabetes educators ( registered nurse and registered dietician ) . Increasing the role played by allied health care professionals in diabetes care and their collaboration with physicians may represent a more cost-effective option for diabetes management . Several systematic review s and meta-analyses have examined multidisciplinary care programs , but these have either been limited to a specific component of multidisciplinary care ( e.g. intensified education programs ) , or were conducted as part of a broader disease management program , of which not all were multidisciplinary in nature . Most review s also do not clearly define the intervention(s ) of interest , making the evaluation of such multidisciplinary community programs challenging . EVIDENCE -BASED ANALYSIS METHODS RESEARCH QUESTIONS What is the evidence of efficacy of specialized multidisciplinary community care provided by at least a registered nurse , registered dietician and physician ( primary care and /or specialist ) for the management of type 2 diabetes compared to usual care ? [ Henceforth referred to as Model 1]What is the evidence of efficacy of specialized multidisciplinary community care provided by at least a pharmacist and a primary care physician for the management of type 2 diabetes compared to usual care ? [ Henceforth referred to as Model 2 ] INCLUSION CRITERIA English language full-reportsPublished between January 1 , 2000 and September 28 , 2008R and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) , systematic review s and meta-analysesType 2 diabetic adult population ( ≥18 years of age)Total sample size ≥30Describe specialized multidisciplinary community care defined as ambulatory-based care provided by at least two health care disciplines ( of which at least one must be a specialist in diabetes ) with integrated communication between the care providers . Compared to usual care ( defined as health care provision by non-specialist(s ) in diabetes , such as primary care providers ; may include referral to other health care professionals/services as necessary)≥6 months follow-up EXCLUSION CRITERIA Studies where discrete results on diabetes can not be abstract edPredominantly home-based interventions Inpatient-based interventions OUTCOMES OF INTEREST The primary outcomes for this review were glycosylated hemoglobin ( rHbA1c ) levels and systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) . SEARCH STRATEGY A literature search was performed on September 28 , 2008 using OVID MEDLINE , MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations , EMBASE , the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature ( CINAHL ) , the Cochrane Library , and the International Agency for Health Technology Assessment ( INAHTA ) for studies published between January 1 , 2000 and September 28 , 2008 . Abstract s were review ed by a single review er and , for those studies meeting the eligibility criteria , full-text articles were obtained . Reference lists were also examined for any additional relevant studies not identified through the search . Articles with unknown eligibility were review ed with a second clinical epidemiologist , then a group of epidemiologists until consensus was established . The quality of evidence was assessed as high , moderate , low or very low according to GRADE methodology . Given the high clinical heterogeneity of the articles that met the inclusion criteria , specific models of specialized multidisciplinary community care were examined based on models of care that are currently being supported in Ontario , models of care that were commonly reported in the literature , as well as suggestions from an Expert Advisory Panel Meeting held on January 21 , 2009 . SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The initial search yielded 2,116 unique citations , from which 22 RCTs trials and nine systematic review s published were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria . Of these , five studies focused on care provided by at least a nurse , dietician , and physician ( primary care and /or specialist ) model of care ( Model 1 ; see Table ES 1 ) , while three studies focused on care provided by at least a pharmacist and primary care physician ( Model 2 ; see Table ES 2 ) . Based on moderate quality evidence , specialized multidisciplinary community care Model 2 has demonstrated a statistically and clinical ly significant reduction in HbA1c of 1.0 % compared with usual care . The effects of this model on SBP , however , are uncertain compared with usual care , based on very-low quality evidence . Specialized multidisciplinary community care Model 2 has demonstrated a statistically and clinical ly significant reduction in both HbA1c of 1.05 % ( based on high quality evidence ) and SBP of 7.13 mm Hg ( based on moderate quality evidence ) compared to usual care . For both models , the evidence does not suggest a preferred setting of care delivery ( i.e. , primary care vs. hospital outpatient clinic vs. community clinic ) . Table ES1 : Summary of Results of Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Multidisciplinary Care Model 1 Outcome Estimate of effect(95 % CI)Heterogeneity I(2)(p-value ) GRADE Glycosylated Hemoglobin ( HbA1c [%])-1.00 [ -1.27 , -0.73]4 % (p=0.37)Moderate- quality Subgroup : Moderate-to-High Quality -0.91 [ -1.19 , -0.62]0 % (p=0.74)Systolic Blood Pressure ( mm Hg)-2.04 [ -13.80 , 9.72]89 % (p=0.002)Very-low quality * Mean change from baseline to follow-up between intervention and control groupsTable ES2 : Summary of Results of Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Multidisciplinary Care Model 2 Outcome Estimate of effect(95 % CI)Heterogeneity I(2)(p-value ) GRADE Glycosylated Hemoglobin ( HbA1c [%])-1.05 [ -1.57 , -0.52]0 % (p=0.75)High- quality Systolic Blood Pressure ( mm Hg)-7.13 [ -11.78 , -2.48]46 % (p=0.17)Moderate quality * Mean change from baseline to follow-up between intervention and control groups Background Despite the efforts of the healthcare community to improve the quality of diabetes care , about 50 % of people with type 2 diabetes do not reach their treatment targets , increasing the risk of future micro- and macro-vascular complications . Diabetes self-management education has been shown to contribute to better disease control . However , it is not known which strategies involving educational programs are cost-effective . Telehealth applications might support chronic disease management . Transferability of successful distant patient self-management support programs to the Belgian setting needs to be confirmed by studies of a high method ological quality . “ The COACH Program ” was developed in Australia as target driven educational telephone delivered intervention to support people with different chronic conditions . It proved to be effective in patients with coronary heart disease after hospitalization . Clinical and cost-effectiveness of The COACH Program in people with type 2 diabetes in Belgium needs to be assessed . Methods / Design R and omized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes . Patients were selected based on their medication consumption data and were recruited by their sickness fund . They were r and omized to receive either usual care plus “ The COACH Program ” or usual care alone . The study will assess the difference in outcomes between groups . The primary outcome measure is the level of HbA1c . The secondary outcomes are : Total Cholesterol , LDL-Cholesterol , HDL-Cholesterol , Triglycerides , Blood Pressure , body mass index , smoking status ; proportion of people at target for HbA1c , LDL-Cholesterol and Blood Pressure ; self-perceived health status , diabetes-specific emotional distress and satisfaction with diabetes care . The follow-up period is 18 months . Within-trial and modeled cost-utility analyses , to project effects over life-time horizon beyond the trial duration , will be undertaken from the perspective of the health care system if the intervention is effective . Discussion The study will enhance our underst and ing of the potential of telehealth in diabetes management in Belgium . Research on the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness is essential to support policy makers in future reimbursement and implementation decisions . Trial registration Belgian number : B322201213625 . Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus ( DM2 ) is a disease with high prevalence and significant impact in terms of mortality and morbidity . The increased prevalence of the disease requires the implementation of new strategies to promote patient self-management . The Spanish Diabetes Self-Management Program ( SDSMP ) has proven to be effective in other setting s. The objective of this study is to assess its effectiveness in terms of care for DM2 patients in primary care setting s within the Basque Health Service – Osakidetza ( Spain ) . Method / Design This is a r and omised clinical trial in which patients diagnosed with DM2 , 18–79 years of age , from four health regions within the Basque Health Service will be r and omised into two groups : an intervention group , who will follow the SDSMP , and a control group , who will receive usual care in accordance with the clinical guidelines for DM2 and existing regulations in our region . The intervention consists of 2,5 hour-group sessions once a week for six weeks . The sessions cover target setting and problem solving techniques , promotion of physical exercise , basic knowledge of nutrition , proper use of medication , effective communication with relatives and health professionals , and basic knowledge about DM2 and its complications . This content is complemented by educational material : books , leaflets and CDs . The primary outcome measure will be the change in glycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) , and secondary outcome measures will include changes in levels of physical activity and intake of fruit and vegetables , cardiovascular risk , quality of life , self-efficacy , number of consultations and drug prescriptions . The results will be analysed 6 , 12 and 24 months after the intervention . Discussion If the intervention were to be effective , the programme should be spread to the entire diabetic population in the Basque Country and it could also be applied for other diseases . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov identifier Introduction Diabetes self-management education interventions in community gathering places have been moderately effective , but very few studies of intervention effectiveness have been conducted among African Americans with type 2 diabetes . This paper describes a church-based diabetes self-management education intervention for African Americans , a r and omized controlled trial to evaluate the intervention , and baseline characteristics of study participants . Methods A New DAWN : Diabetes Awareness & Wellness Network was conducted among 24 churches of varying size in North Carolina . Each church recruited congregants with type 2 diabetes and design ated a diabetes advisor , or peer counselor , to be part of the intervention team . Participants were enrolled at each church and r and omized as a unit to either the special intervention or the minimal intervention . The special intervention included one individual counseling visit , twelve group sessions , three postcard messages from the participant 's diabetes care provider , and twelve monthly telephone calls from a diabetes advisor . Baseline data included measures of weight , hemoglobin A1c , blood pressure , physical activity , dietary and diabetes self-care practice s , and psychosocial factors . The study to evaluate the intervention ( from enrollment visit to last follow-up ) began in February 2001 and ended in August 2003 . Results Twenty-four churches ( with 201 total participants ) were r and omized . Sixty-four percent of the participants were women . On average , the participants were aged 59 years and sedentary . They had an average of 12 years of education , had been diagnosed with diabetes for 9 years , had a body mass index of 35 , had a  hemoglobin  A1c level of 7.8 % , and had a reported dietary intake of 39 % of calories from fat . Conclusion A New DAWN is a culturally sensitive , church-based diabetes self-management education program for African Americans with type 2 diabetes that is being evaluated for effectiveness in a r and omized controlled trial . The outcomes of A New DAWN will contribute to the literature on community-based interventions for minority population s and help to inform the selection of approaches to improve diabetes care in this population UNLABELLED This review should be cited as : Renders CM , Valk GD , Griffin S. Wagner EH , Eijk JThM van , Assendelft WJJ . Interventions to improve the management of  diabetes mellitus  in primary care , outpatient and community setting s ( Cochrane Review ) . In : The Cochrane Library , Issue 2 , 2001 . Oxford : Up date Software . A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 29 June 2000 . Cochrane review s are regularly checked and up date d if necessary . BACKGROUND Diabetes is a common chronic disease that is increasingly managed in primary care . Different systems have been proposed to manage diabetes care . OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of different interventions , targeted at health professionals or the structure in which they deliver care , on the management of patients with diabetes in primary care , outpatient and community setting s. SEARCH STRATEGY We search ed the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register , the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register ( Issue 4 1999 ) , MEDLINE ( 1966 - 1999 ) , EMBASE ( 1980 - 1999 ) , Cinahl ( 1982 - 1999 ) , and reference lists of articles . SELECTION CRITERIA R and omised trials ( RCTs ) , controlled clinical trials ( CCTs ) , controlled before and after studies ( CBAs ) and interrupted time series ( ITS ) analyses of professional , financial and organisational strategies aim ed at improving care for people with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes . The participants were health care professionals , including physicians , nurses and pharmacists . The outcomes included objective ly measured health professional performance or patient outcomes , and self-report measures with known validity and reliability . DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review ers independently extracted data and assessed study quality . MAIN RESULTS Forty-one studies were included involving more than 200 practice s and 48,000 patients . Twenty-seven studies were RCTs , 12 were CBAs , and two were ITS . The studies were heterogeneous in terms of interventions , participants , setting s and outcomes . The method ological quality of the studies was often poor . In all studies the intervention strategy was multifaceted . In 12 studies the interventions were targeted at health professionals , in nine they were targeted at the organization of care , and 20 studies targeted both . In 15 studies patient education was added to the professional and organisational interventions . A combination of professional interventions improved process outcomes . The effect on patient outcomes remained less clear as these were rarely assessed . Arrangements for follow-up ( organisational intervention ) also showed a favourable effect on process outcomes . Multiple interventions in which patient education was added or in which the role of the nurse was enhanced also reported favourable effects on patients ' health outcomes . REVIEW ERS ' CONCLUSION : Multifaceted professional interventions can enhance the performance of health professionals in managing patients with diabetes .  Organisational interventions that improve regular prompted recall and review of patients  ( central computerised tracking systems or nurses who regularly contact the patient ) can also improve diabetes management . The addition of patient-oriented interventions can lead to improved patient health outcomes . Nurses can play an important role in patient-oriented interventions , through patient education or facilitating adherence to treatment The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a three-day therapeutic education programme on perceived competence , self-management behaviours ( i.e. physical activity , diet and medication ) and glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes . A total of 120 participants were included in this r and omized , wait list control group trial . The results confirm that therapeutic education may be a powerful healthcare intervention to improve lifestyle and health status of people with type 2 diabetes . We observed that the education programme used in this study generated positive changes in glycaemic control and adherence to physical activity and diet after three months follow-up . Furthermore , the intervention positively impacted participants ’ perceived competence towards physical activity and diet . The latter finding is of particular importance , given that perceived competence has been found to be involved in long-term adherence to self-management behaviours The objectives of this study are to assess the impact of pre-existing diabetes and diabetes treatment on breast cancer prognosis . 8,108 women with central ly confirmed invasive breast cancer in the Women ’s Health Initiative diagnosed between 1998 and 2013 were followed through the date of death or September 20 , 2013 . Information on diabetes and diabetes therapy were obtained via self-report and face-to-face review of current medication containers , respectively . Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate adjusted relative hazard ratios for overall mortality . The proportional subdistribution hazard model was used to estimate hazard ratios for breast cancer-specific mortality . Compared with women without diabetes , women with diabetes had significantly increased risk of overall mortality ( HR 1.26 95 % CI 1.06–1.48 ) , especially among those who took insulin or had longer duration of diabetes . However , diabetes was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality , regardless of type of treatment and duration of diabetes , despite the significant association of diabetes with unfavorable tumor characteristics . Our large prospect i ve cohort study provides additional evidence that pre-existing diabetes increases risk of total mortality among women with breast cancer . The increased total mortality associated with diabetes was mainly driven by increased risk of dying from diseases other than breast cancer . Thus , the continuum of care for breast cancer patients with diabetes should include careful attention to CVD risk factors and other non-cancer conditions AIMS To explore differences in self-care behaviour according to demographic and illness characteristics ; and relationships among self-care behaviour and demographic and illness characteristics , efficacy expectations and outcome expectations of people with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan . BACKGROUND Most people with diabetes do not control their disease appropriately in Taiwan . Enhanced self-efficacy towards managing diseases can be an effective way of improving disease control as proposed by the self-efficacy model which provides a useful framework for underst and ing adherence to self-care behaviours . DESIGN AND METHODS The sample comprised 145 patients with type 2 diabetes aged 30 years or more from diabetes outpatient clinics in Taipei . Data were collected using a self-administered question naire for this study . One-way anova , t-tests , Pearson product moment correlation and hierarchical regression were analysed for the study . RESULTS Significant differences were found : between self-care behaviour and complications ( t = -2.52 , p < 0.01 ) and patient education ( t = -1.96 , p < 0.05 ) . Self-care behaviour was significantly and positively correlated with duration of diabetes ( r = 0.36 , p < 0.01 ) , efficacy expectations ( r = 0.54 , p < 0.01 ) and outcome expectations ( r = 0.44 , p < 0.01 ) . A total of 39.1 % of variance in self-care behaviour can be explained by duration of diabetes , efficacy expectations and outcome expectations . CONCLUSIONS Findings support the use of the self-efficacy model as a framework for underst and ing adherence to self-care behaviour . RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Using self-efficacy theory when design ing patient education interventions for people with type 2 diabetes will enhance self-management routines and assist in reducing major complications in the future Background : The benefits of self-monitoring blood glucose levels are unclear in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who do not use insulin , but there are considerable costs . We sought to determine the cost effectiveness of self-monitoring for patients with type 2 diabetes not using insulin . Methods : We performed an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of the self-monitoring of blood glucose in adults with type 2 diabetes not taking insulin . We used the United Kingdom Prospect i ve Diabetes Study ( UKPDS ) model to forecast diabetes-related complications , corresponding quality -adjusted life years and costs . Clinical data were obtained from a systematic review comparing self-monitoring with no self-monitoring .  Costs and utility decrements were derived from published sources . We performed sensitivity analyses to examine the robustness of the results . Results : Based on a clinical ly modest reduction in hemoglobin A1C of 0.25 % ( 95 % confidence interval 0.15–0.36 ) estimated from the systematic review , the UKPDS model predicted that self-monitoring performed 7 or more times per week reduced the lifetime incidence of diabetes-related complications compared with no self-monitoring , albeit at a higher cost ( incremental cost per quality -adjusted life year $ 113 643 ) . The results were largely unchanged in the sensitivity analysis , although the incremental cost per quality -adjusted life year fell within widely cited cost-effectiveness thresholds when testing frequency or the price per test strip was substantially reduced from the current levels . Interpretation : For most patients with type 2 diabetes not using insulin , use of blood glucose test strips for frequent self-monitoring ( ≥ 7 times per week ) is unlikely to represent efficient use of finite health care re sources , although periodic testing ( e.g. , 1 or 2 times per week ) may be cost-effective . Reduced test strip price would likely also improve cost-effectiveness
Conclusions The available evidence suggests that diabetes self-management education can reduce all-cause mortality risk in type 2 diabetes patients .
Background Diabetes self-management education is an essential part of diabetes care , but its impact on all-cause mortality risk of type 2 diabetes patients is unclear .
A systematic review and meta- analysis aim ing to eluci date the impact of diabetes self-management education on all-cause mortality risk of type 2 diabetes patients was performed .