Are benzodiazepines still the medication of choice for patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia? Reboxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for panic disorder. Flumazenil provocation of panic attacks. Evidence for altered benzodiazepine receptor sensitivity in panic disorder. Combined Paroxetine and Clonazepam Treatment Strategies Compared to Paroxetine Monotherapy for Panic Disorder Psychopharmacological treatment of panic disorder and related states: A Placebo controlled study of alprazolam Fluvoxamine in the treatment of panic disorder: a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in outpatients The efficacy of reboxetine in the treatment-refractory patients with panic disorder: an open label study. Rate of improvement during and across three treatments for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: cognitive behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or both combined. Therapeutic response to benzodiazepine in panic disorder subtypes. Diazepam versus alprazolam for the treatment of panic disorder. Escitalopram in the treatment of panic disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The use of low-dose intranasal midazolam to treat panic disorder: a pilot study. Early coadministration of clonazepam with sertraline for panic disorder. Efficacy of CBT for benzodiazepine discontinuation in patients with panic disorder: Further evaluation. Sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder: a flexible-dose multicenter trial. The effect of mirtazapine in panic disorder: an open label pilot study with a single-blind placebo run-in period Do antidepressants selectively suppress spontaneous (unexpected) panic attacks? A replication. Alprazolam in panic disorder and agoraphobia: results from a multicenter trial. I. Efficacy in short-term treatment. Interactive Model of Therapeutic Response in Panic Disorder: Moclobemide, a Case in Point Effect of alprazolam and diazepam on anxiety and panic attacks in panic disorder: a controlled study. Time to response in panic disorder in a naturalistic setting: combination therapy with alprazolam orally disintegrating tablets and serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared to serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone. Alprazolam plasma concentrations and treatment response in panic disorder and agoraphobia. Longitudinal outcome with pharmacotherapy in a naturalistic study of panic disorder.
OBJECTIVE Recently , pharmacological treatment guidelines for panic disorder have changed as newer treatment options have become available . The authors examined how the use of psychotropic drugs has shifted over the course of 10 years to determine if prescribing patterns have changed to reflect these revised treatment guidelines . METHOD A total of 443 patients with panic disorder were enrolled in the Harvard/Brown Anxiety Research Project , a prospect i ve longitudinal study of anxiety disorders . These patients were interviewed over the course of 10 years to examine their use of psychotropic medications . RESULTS Despite efforts aim ed at increasing the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) in patients with panic disorder ( e.g. , APA 's practice guideline for panic disorder , Food and Drug Administration approval of particular SSRIs for the treatment of panic disorder ) , only a modest increase in their use was found . Treatment patterns for psychotropic drugs  appear to have remained stable over the past decade , with benzodiazepines being the most commonly used medication for panic disorder . In comparison , SSRI use throughout the follow-up period has remained low . Patients using an SSRI did not have a more favorable clinical course than those using a benzodiazepine , nor were there significantly better rates of remission in patients using SSRIs and benzodiazepines concomitantly . CONCLUSIONS These results highlight a gap between pharmacological treatment guidelines and actual delivery of care in that recommendations to use SSRIs to treat panic disorder are not being followed . Factors potentially associated with promoting and ignoring treatment recommendations are discussed BACKGROUND Tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) as well as benzodiazepines have been shown to be effective for the treatment of panic disorder . The introduction of SSRIs has enabled a greater underst and ing of the role of serotonin in the etiology of panic disorder ; however , the role of norepinephrine has been more challenging to ascertain . The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine , a novel selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor , in patients with panic disorder with and without agoraphobia . METHOD Eighty-two patients ( aged 18 - 65 years ) with DSM-III-R panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , were r and omly assigned to receive 6 to 8 mg/day of reboxetine ( 42 patients ) or placebo ( 40 patients ) for 8 weeks in this placebo-controlled , parallel-group , double-blind clinical trial . RESULTS Of the 82 patients enrolled in the trial , 75 were considered in the analysis ( 37 patients in the reboxetine group and 38 patients in the placebo group ) . At last assessment , there was a significant reduction in the mean number of panic attacks ( range , 9.3 - 1.2 ) and phobic symptoms ( range , 8.1 - 3.2 ) in the reboxetine group compared with the placebo group ( ranges , 8.5 - 5.8 and 7.7 - 5.2 , respectively ; p < .05 ) . Improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression , Hopkins Symptom Checklist-90 , and Sheehan Disability Scale scores were also greater in the reboxetine group compared with the placebo group . Adverse events reported more frequently with reboxetine than placebo included dry mouth ( 36 % vs. 16 % ) , constipation ( 27 % vs. 22 % ) , and insomnia ( 26 % vs. 22 % ) . CONCLUSION Reboxetine was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of panic disorder The possibility that panic disorder might be due to abnormal activity of endogenous lig and s of the benzodiazepine receptor was investigated with the use of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil .  Physiological and subjective psychological responses to this selective antagonist were measured in 10 patients with panic disorder and in 10 control subjects , by using a placebo-controlled crossover study design . Subjective anxiety responses after flumazenil infusion were significantly higher in the patient group with panic disorder than in the controls , and eight patients with panic disorder but no controls had panic attacks . This anxiogenic effect of flumazenil in the patients argues against the presence of endogenous anxiogenic ( inverse agonist ) lig and s. Possible explanations include the differential production of an anxiolytic endogenous lig and or an altered benzodiazepine receptor " set-point . " Such an abnormality may contribute to the pathogenesis of panic disorder Despite the widespread application of combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI ) and benzodiazepine treatment for panic disorder , there has been relatively little systematic assessment of the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic strategy . Although the limited number of studies to date suggest a more rapid onset of benefit with combined treatment , this study is the first to address the critical question of whether continued combined treatment confers superior efficacy . This study is a r and omized , double-blind , three-arm study in patients with panic disorder ( n = 60 ) , comparing the efficacy and safety of paroxetine and placebo ( PP ) , paroxetine coadministered with clonazepam followed by a tapered benzodiazepine discontinuation phase ( PC-D ) , and ongoing combination treatment ( PC-M ) . All treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement by endpoint . There was a significant advantage for the combined treatment groups early in treatment but , subsequently , outcome in all three groups was similar . A trend towards greater achievement of endpoint remission status for the PC-D group was attenuated when variability in baseline severity was considered . The results of this study should be interpreted in the context of a relatively moderate sample size and higher rates of early dropout . Combined treatment with paroxetine and clonazepam result ed in more rapid response than with the SSRI alone , but there was no differential benefit beyond the initial few weeks of therapy . Initiating combined treatment followed by benzodiazepine taper after a few weeks may provide early benefit while avoiding the potential adverse consequences of long-term combination therapy The paper consists of two parts . A review of the relationship of panic disorder to the phobic states and the treatment of these disorders by means of tricyclic antidepressants , MAOIs , beta blocking drugs and benzodiazepines . A double blind study of alprazolam and placebo in 118 patients with agoraphobia and panic is presented . In an eight week study alprazolam was found to be significantly superior to placebo in the treatment of panic attacks , phobic avoidance , anticipatory anxiety and general anxiety Serotonergic mechanisms have been implicated in panic disorder , and several preliminary studies suggest that fluvoxamine , a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI ) , is helpful in its treatment . This 8-week double-blind parallel-group study compared fluvoxamine with a placebo in 188 patients with DSM-III-R defined panic disorder with or without agoraphobia . Efficacy assessment s included a Daily Panic Attack Inventory , the Sheehan Disability Scale , the Clinical Anxiety Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale . When compared with the placebo , fluvoxamine produced highly significant improvements in most measures of the frequency and severity of panic disorder and in the more global aspects of disability and distress . Significant improvement was evident as early as week 1 for some panic variables . Fluvoxamine is a potent anti-panic agent with a relatively rapid onset of action BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are currently the first-line treatment for panic disorder , although up to 30 % of patients either do not respond to SSRIs or withdraw due to adverse events . Reboxetine , a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ( selective NRI ) , is effective in treating depression and may alleviate depression-related anxiety . This study aim ed to investigate the efficacy of reboxetine in the treatment of patients with panic disorder who did not respond to SSRIs . METHOD In this 6-week , open-label study , 29 adult out patients with panic disorder who had previously failed to respond to SSRI treatment received reboxetine 2 mg/day , titrated to a maximum of 8 mg/day over the first 10 days .  Efficacy was assessed using the Panic Self- Question naire ( PSQ ) , the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety ( HAM-A ) , the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ( HRSD ) and the Global Assessment of Functioning ( GAF ) Scale . RESULTS The 24 patients who completed the study responded well to reboxetine treatment . Significant improvement ( p < 0.001 ) was observed in the number of daily panic attacks , and on the scales measuring anxiety , depression and functioning . Reboxetine was generally well tolerated . Five patients withdrew due to  adverse events . CONCLUSIONS Reboxetine appears to be effective in the treatment of SSRI-refractory panic disorder patients and warrants further clinical investigation BACKGROUND Existing literature on panic disorder ( PD ) yields no data regarding the differential rates of improvement during Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ( CBT ) , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor ( SSRI ) or both combined ( CBT+SSRI ) . METHOD Patients were r and omized to CBT , SSRI or CBT+SSRI which each lasted one year including three months of medication taper . Participating patients kept record of the frequency of panic attacks throughout the full year of treatment . Rate of improvement on panic frequency and the relationship between rate of improvement and baseline agoraphobia ( AG ) were examined . RESULTS A significant decline in frequency of panic attacks was observed for each treatment modality . SSRI and CBT+SSRI were associated with a significant faster rate of improvement as compared to CBT . Gains were maintained after tapering medication . For patients with moderate or severe AG , CBT+SSRI was associated with a more rapid improvement on panic frequency as compared to patients receiving either mono-treatment . LIMITATIONS Frequency of panic attacks was not assessed beyond the full year of treatment . Second , only one process variable was used . CONCLUSIONS Patients with PD respond well to each treatment as indicated by a significant decline in panic attacks .  CBT is associated with a slower rate of improvement as compared to SSRI and CBT+SSRI . Discontinuation of SSRI treatment does not result in a revival of frequency of panic attacks . Our data suggest that for patients without or with only mild AG , SSRI-only will suffice . For patients with moderate or severe AG , the combined CBT+SSRI treatment is recommended CONTEXT This study makes a comparison between two subtypes of panic disorder regarding the clinical efficacy of clonazepam , a benzodiazepine . OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical efficacy of clonazepam in a fixed dosage ( 2 mg/day ) , compared to placebo , in the treatment of panic disorder patients and to verify whether there are any differences in the responses to clonazepam between panic disorder patients with the respiratory and non-respiratory subtypes . TYPE OF STUDY R and omized study with clonazepam and placebo . SETTING Outpatient Anxiety and Depression Unit of the Institute of Psychiatry , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil . PARTICIPANTS 34 patients with a diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia , between 18 and 55 years old . PROCEDURES Administration of clonazepam or placebo for 6 weeks , in panic disorder patients , after they were classified within two subtypes of panic disorder : respiratory and non-respiratory . MAIN MEASUREMENTS Changes in the number of panic attacks in comparison with the period before the beginning of the study ; Hamilton Anxiety Scale ; Global Clinical Impression Scale ; and Patient 's Global Impression scale . RESULTS In the group that received clonazepam , by the end of the 6th week there was a statistically significant clinical improvement , shown by the remission of panic attacks ( p < 0.001 ) and decrease in anxiety ( p = 0.024 ) . In the group that received clonazepam there was no significant difference between the respiratory and non-respiratory subtypes of panic disorder , regarding the therapeutic response to clonazepam . CONCLUSION Clonazepam was equally effective in the treatment of the respiratory and non-respiratory subtypes of panic disorder , suggesting there is no difference in the therapeutic response between the two subtypes BACKGROUND Alprazolam has proven efficacy as a treatment for panic disorder , but the place of other benzodiazepines is less well established . METHOD To compare the efficacy and tolerability of diazepam and alprazolam for the disorder , a placebo-controlled , double-blind trial was undertaken in two sites . Two hundred forty-one subjects with panic disorder or agoraphobia with panic attacks were r and omly assigned to flexible doses of diazepam , alprazolam , or placebo for 8 weeks . RESULTS At the end of the trial , over 60 % of subjects taking either diazepam or alprazolam were at least moderately improved compared with less than 30 % of those taking placebo . On all measures of efficacy , subjects taking diazepam and alprazolam showed an equally favorable response . Despite some sedation early in the trial , both drugs were tolerated well . More severely ill subjects responded less well to either benzodiazepine . CONCLUSION The results indicate that diazepam is an effective alternative to alprazolam for the treatment of panic disorder BACKGROUND Escitalopram , the therapeutically active isomer of the racemic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant citalopram , has shown significant anxiolytic effects in placebo-controlled clinical trials of social anxiety disorder , generalized anxiety disorder , and anxiety symptoms associated with major depression . This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of escitalopram in out patients diagnosed with panic disorder . METHOD Male and female out patients between 18 and 80 years of age meeting DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram , citalopram , or placebo in a study conducted from September 1999 to July 2001 . The primary measure of efficacy was panic attack frequency at week 10 relative to baseline , as assessed by the Modified Sheehan Panic and Anticipatory Anxiety Scale . RESULTS A total of 366 subjects ( 128 escitalopram patients , 119 citalopram patients , and 119 placebo patients ) received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment . The frequency of panic attacks was statistically significantly improved ( p = .04 ) , and the increase in percentage of patients with zero panic attacks reached borderline significance ( p = .051 ) , in the escitalopram-treated group relative to the placebo-treated group . Both escitalopram and citalopram statistically significantly reduced panic disorder symptoms and severity versus placebo at endpoint ( p < /=.05 ) , as measured by the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale total score , the Clinical Global Impressions scale , the Patient Global Evaluation , and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Question naire . Treatment with escitalopram was safe and well tolerated , with a similar incidence of the most common adverse events for the escitalopram and placebo groups . The rate of discontinuation for adverse events was 6.3 % for escitalopram , 8.4 % for citalopram , and 7.6 % for placebo . CONCLUSION Escitalopram is efficacious , safe , and well tolerated in the treatment of panic disorder BACKGROUND Drug therapy of panic disorder , despite the intermittent nature of the panic attack , requires daily administration of antidepressants , which are often not tolerated , or benzodiazepines , which can result in physical dependence and withdrawal . The use of rapidly acting , low-dose intranasal midazolam to prevent incipient panic suggested itself to us as a novel alternative treatment strategy . METHOD We conducted a 6-week double-blind , placebo-controlled , crossover- design pilot study of the safety and efficacy of p.r.n . low-dose intranasal midazolam in five patients diagnosed with DSM-III-R panic disorder . RESULTS One to two drops of midazolam ( approximately 0.25 to 0.5 mg ) was well tolerated and highly effective in preventing incipient panic attacks and in reducing the overall weekly frequency of attacks . CONCLUSION Intermittent intranasal midazolam shows promise as a novel alternative treatment for panic , but a controlled study of its efficacy and safety ( including abuse potential ) must be conducted BACKGROUND There is debate about combining benzodiazepines with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the acute treatment of panic disorder . Although this medication combination is widely used in clinical practice , there is no well-tested , optimal method of coadministering these medications for the treatment of panic disorder . The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of early coadministration of clonazepam with sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder . METHODS Fifty patients with panic disorder were r and omized into a double-blind clinical trial . Patients received open-label sertraline for 12 weeks ( target dose , 100 mg/d ) , and in addition were r and omized to groups receiving either 0.5 mg of active clonazepam 3 times daily or placebo clonazepam for the first 4 weeks of the trial . The clonazepam dose was then tapered during 3 weeks and discontinued . RESULTS Thirty-four ( 68 % ) of 50 patients completed the trial .  Drop-out rates were similar in the sertraline/placebo vs the sertraline/clonazepam group ( 38 % vs 25 % ) ( P = .5 ) . An intent-to-treat analysis ( on last observation carried forward data ) revealed a much greater proportion of responders in the sertraline/clonazepam compared with the sertraline/placebo group at the end of week 1 of the trial ( 41 % vs 4 % ) ( P = .003 ) . There was also a significant between-group difference at the end of week 3 with 14 ( 63 % ) of 22 of the sertraline/clonazepam group responding to treatment vs 8 ( 32 % ) of 25 of the sertraline/placebo group ( P = .05 ) . This difference was not observed at other times during the trial . CONCLUSION These data indicate that rapid stabilization of panic symptoms can be safely achieved with a sertraline/clonazepam combination , supporting the clinical utility of this type of regimen for facilitating early improvement of panic symptoms relative to sertraline alone Despite its acute efficacy for the treatment of panic disorder , benzodiazepines ( BZs ) are associated with a withdrawal syndrome that closely mimics anxiety sensations , leading to difficulty with treatment discontinuation and often disorder relapse . An exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment for BZ discontinuation , Panic Control Treatment for BZ Discontinuation ( CBT ) targets the fear of these sensations and has demonstrated efficacy in preventing disorder relapse and facilitating successful BZ discontinuation among patients with panic disorder . In this r and omized controlled trial , CBT was compared to taper alone and a taper plus a relaxation condition to control for the effect of therapist contact and support among 47 patients with panic disorder seeking taper from BZs . Based on the primary outcome of successful discontinuation of BZ use , results indicate that adjunctive CBT provided additive benefits above both taper alone and taper plus relaxation , with consistently medium and large effect sizes over time that reached significance at the six month follow-up evaluation . The efficacy of CBT relative to either of the other taper conditions reflected very large and significant effect sizes at that time . These findings suggest that CBT provides specific efficacy for the successful discontinuation from BZs , even when controlling for therapist contact and relaxation training BACKGROUND The serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors are increasingly being used for the treatment of panic disorder . We examined the efficacy and safety of the serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor sertraline hydrochloride in patients with panic disorder . METHODS One hundred seventy-six nondepressed out patients with panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , from 10 sites followed identical protocol s that used a flexible-dose design . After 2 weeks of single-blind placebo , patients were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind , flexible-dose treatment with either sertraline hydrochloride ( 50 - 200 mg/d ) or placebo . RESULTS Sertraline-treated patients exhibited significantly greater improvement ( P=.01 ) at end point than did patients treated with placebo for the primary outcome variable , panic attack frequency . Significant differences between groups were also evident for clinician and patient assessment s of improvement as measured by the Clinical Global Impression Improvement ( P=.01 ) and Severity ( P=.009 ) Scales , Panic Disorder Severity Scale ratings ( P=.03 ) , high end-state function assessment ( P=.03 ) , Patient Global Evaluation rating ( P=.01 ) , and quality of life scores ( P=.003 ) . Adverse events , generally characterized as either mild or moderate , were not significantly different in overall incidence between the sertraline and placebo groups . CONCLUSION Results support the safety and efficacy of sertraline for the short-term treatment of patients with panic disorder In this open label pilot study , we studied the efficacy of mirtazapine ( Remeron ) in panic disorder . Twenty-eight patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia ( 10 males/18 females ) , were included and 19 patients completed the study . The 15-week trial started with a 3-week single-blind placebo run-in period . After this run-in period , the 12-week active treatment phase started . As primary efficacy measures , we studied the decrease in the number of full symptom panic attacks and the number of patients completely free of panic during the last 3 weeks of the study . Seventy-four percent of the patients were considered responders , according to a decrease of at least 50 % in panic attack frequency . All primary and secondary efficacy measures showed a significant improvement from the second week of active treatment onwards to endpoint . The main side-effects were different from the usual side-effects in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) ( initial drowsiness , weight gain and pain in the legs ) . The results of this open label study in panic disorder suggest that mirtazapine seems to be a fast and effective treatment alternative for SSRIs in panic disorder The purpose of this study was to test the following interrelated hypotheses in a larger sample by attempting to replicate supportive results from a small therapeutic study : ( 1 ) the pathogenesis of panic disorder includes at least two identifiable components : a biological component represented by spontaneous ( unexpected ) panic attacks , and a cognitive component represented by situational attacks and especially by phobias ; ( 2 ) these components respond differently to treatment ; ( 3 ) many biological processes respond to an effective intervention in proportion to their deviance from " normal " prior to treatment ( " Law of Initial Value " ) ; and ( 4 ) the response of spontaneous panic attacks to an effective treatment conforms to that model . Previously , the authors reanalyzed an 8-week therapeutic study of panic disorder that included groups treated with  placebo  and with  imipramine ( 225 mg daily ) . The criteria of response were spontaneous panic attacks ( biological component ) , situational panic attacks ( both components ) , and agoraphobia ratings ( cognitive component ) . The analyses compared the regression lines for posttreatment status on pretreatment status in the imipramine and placebo groups . The effect of imipramine on spontaneous panic attacks fitted the hypothesized model : the pre-post slope in the placebo group was approximately 1 ( 45 degrees ) , whereas the slope in the imipramine group was approximately 0 . There was no significant difference in pre-post slopes between the imipramine and placebo groups for situational panic attacks or agoraphobia ratings . For this report , the authors applied the same approach to another larger data set from a study using a similar design , but a different antidepressant . In this multicenter , double-blind study , patients with panic disorder were r and omly assigned to receive 10 weeks of treatment with  placebo ( N = 78 ) or fluoxetine 10 mg ( N = 84 ) or 20 mg ( N = 81 ) daily . Spontaneous and situational panic attacks were registered in a daily diary , and agoraphobia was rated at each visit . Using baseline and endpoint data , fluoxetine had a statistically significant , dose-dependent , suppressive effect on spontaneous panic attacks , as measured by the pre-post slopes in the three treatment groups . The placebo group showed some response ( slope = 0.69 ) . There were no significant drug effects on situational panic attacks . On ratings of agoraphobia , the slopes in the placebo and the fluoxetine 20 mg groups did not differ , but the slope in the fluoxetine 10 mg group was significantly less than that in the placebo group , suggesting a therapeutic drug effect on agoraphobia only at the lower dose . These results are consistent with the stated hypotheses . They suggest that the therapeutic effects of antidepressants on panic disorder may be due primarily to the specific suppression of spontaneous panic attacks among patients with high baseline pathologic findings . Implication s of these results for concepts of pathogenesis , clinical practice , and therapeutic research regarding panic disorder are discussed Following promising preliminary evidence , the benzodiazepine-derivative alprazolam was studied in a large , placebo-controlled , eight-week , flexible-dose trial in patients with agoraphobia with panic attacks and panic disorder . Of 526 patients , 481 completed three weeks of treatment ; however , significantly more placebo ( 102/234 ) than alprazolam ( 21/247 ) recipients subsequently dropped out of the trial , primarily citing ineffectiveness ( of placebo ) as the reason . Alprazolam was found to be effective and well tolerated . There were significant alprazolam-placebo differences in improvement for ( 1 ) spontaneous and situational panic attacks , ( 2 ) phobic fears , ( 3 ) avoidance behavior , ( 4 ) anxiety , and ( 5 ) secondary disability , all significant by the end of week 1 . At the primary comparison point ( week 4 ) , 82 % of the patients receiving alprazolam were rated moderately improved or better vs 43 % of the placebo group . At that point , 50 % of the alprazolam recipients vs 28 % of placebo recipients were free of panic attacks It was proposed that pre-post regression slopes be used to index treatment response when the effect of baseline scores differed among treatments ( interaction between treatment and baseline score ) . Reanalyses of two studies using imipramine and fluoxetine in panic disorder showed doserelated decreases in pre-post slopes for the frequency of unexpected panic attacks , but not for the frequency of situational panic attacks or measures of agoraphobia . This report presents similar analyses of data from a study using moclobemide .  Patients ( N = 452 ) with panic disorder were r and omized to placebo  or a fixed dose of moclobemide ( 75 , 150 , 300 , 600 , or 900 mg/day ) . They were treated double-blindly and evaluated at baseline and 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , and 8 weeks later . The authors analyzed the frequency of unexpected and situational panic attacks compiled from a daily diary , and fear and avoidance ratings based on the patient ’s main phobia using baseline ( pre ) and end-point ( post ) values for all r and omized patients . Adjoining dose groups were combined . Both unexpected and situational panic attacks showed systematic doserelated suppression of pre-post treatment slopes . Neither pre-post slopes nor adjusted posttreatment means for fear and avoidance differed reliably between treatment arms . This study replicates the authors ’ earlier findings , except for situational panic attacks , which probably were not reliably identified . Antidepressants selectively suppress panic attacks , especially unexpected attacks , but not agoraphobia . The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that panic disorder with agoraphobia has clinical ly separable biologic and cognitive components that respond differentially to treatment . Antidepressants benefit primarily patients with many unexpected panic attacks . Investigators should evaluate pre-post treatment slopes before comparing adjusted posttreatment means ( analysis of covariance ) Forty-eight patients currently experiencing panic attacks were r and omly assigned to double-blind treatment with alprazolam , diazepam , or placebo .  Efficacy was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety and a panic attack frequency rating scale . Results indicate that the two active treatments appeared equally effective in reducing both the frequency of panic attacks and the severity of generalized anxiety when compared with placebo . Overall , these data support the use of benzodiazepines in the treatment of panic disorder OBJECTIVE This study evaluated time to response in the treatment of panic disorder with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI ) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ( SNRI ) combined with alprazolam orally disintegrating tablets ( ODT ) , or SSRI/SNRI alone . DESIGN Subjects were r and omized to eight weeks open-label treatment with alprazolam ODT ( 4 weeks treatment followed by 3 - 4 week taper ) combined with an SSRI or SNRI , or treatment with SSRI/SNRI alone . SETTING The study was conducted under naturalistic conditions at 62 primary care and 34 psychiatric practice s. PARTICIPANTS Male or female subjects ≥18 years of age diagnosed with panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia . MEASUREMENTS The primary efficacy measure was time to response , defined as ≥50-percent decrease from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety ( HAM-A ) total score . Secondary measures included change from baseline in HAM-A scores and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement ( CGI-I ) and Patient Global Impression ( PGI ) scales . RESULTS The intent-to-treat ( ITT ) population comprised 245 subjects . There was no statistical difference between treatment groups in time to response in the ITT population ; however , a prospect ively defined per protocol analysis revealed a statistically significant earlier onset of effect in subjects receiving SSRI/SNRI plus alprazolam ODT ( P<0.05 ) . Mean change from baseline in HAM-A total score and clinician and patient measures of global improvement also showed statistically significant early advantages for combination therapy compared with SSRI/SNRI monotherapy . CONCLUSION Combined treatment of panic disorder with alprazolam ODT and an SSRI/SNRI may be associated with more rapid improvement in anxiety symptoms compared with an SSRI/SNRI alone OBJECTIVE The authors ' goal was to evaluate the relationship between plasma concentrations of alprazolam and both treatment response and side effects in patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia . METHOD Ninety-six patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia were treated at three sites in a 6-week , fixed-dose , double-blind , placebo-controlled , dose-response study of 2 mg/day or 6 mg/day of alprazolam . Assessment s were made of panic attacks , avoidance behavior , generalized anxiety , and global response . Blood sample s were collected throughout the study and analyzed for alprazolam and other benzodiazepines . RESULTS Patient compliance with the protocol was judged to be good on the basis of plasma concentrations . According to logistic regression analysis , the relationships between plasma alprazolam concentration and response , as reflected by number of panic attacks reported , phobia ratings , physicians ' and patients ' ratings of global improvement , and the emergence of side effects , were significant . However , there was no significant relationship between plasma alprazolam concentration and the degree of generalized anxiety symptoms . CONCLUSIONS The authors conclude that plasma concentration of alprazolam  is related to treatment response , particularly in panic attacks . The  alprazolam concentration associated with treatment response or with emergence of a given side effect varied widely among individuals , highlighting the necessity for individualized dose adjustment to obtain optimal treatment response while minimizing side effects BACKGROUND Current recommendations suggest that pharmacotherapy for patients with panic disorder should be continued for at least 1 year [ Am . J. Psychiatry 155 ( 1998 ) 1 ] , despite a paucity of data systematic ally examining outcome for periods greater than 3 - 6 months . It is critically important to obtain more information on the effectiveness of medications over time for patients who initially responded to pharmacotherapy for panic disorder . METHODS Long-term outcome was examined for 78 patients who attained a 2-month period of sustained remission on medication and received maintenance pharmacotherapy for up to 24 months during the Massachusetts General Hospital Longitudinal Study of Panic Disorder , a prospect i ve , naturalistic study . Participants were categorized by their maintenance treatment condition at remission : benzodiazepine alone ( N = 45 , 58 % ) , antidepressant alone ( N = 12 , 16 % ) , and combined treatment with a benzodiazepine and an antidepressant ( N = 21 , 27 % ) . RESULTS Approximately half ( N = 36 , 46 % ) of the patients who had achieved remission relapsed at some time over the 2-year naturalistic study period , despite continued and adequate pharmacotherapy . There was no difference in timing or frequency of relapse by type of maintenance pharmacotherapy . LIMITATIONS Interpretation of the data is limited by the naturalistic nature of the study , and by the relatively low sample size . CONCLUSIONS This data suggests that patients with panic disorder have a high rate of relapse even after acute response to pharmacotherapy , despite continued treatment . In addition , the use of combined pharmacotherapy with antidepressants and benzodiazepines does not appear to provide greater protection from relapse than monotherapy
Two primary outcomes of efficacy and acceptability showed a possible advantage of benzodiazepines over placebo .
Low- quality evidence shows a possible superiority of benzodiazepine over placebo in the short-term treatment of panic disorders .
Due to these limitations , our results regarding the efficacy of benzodiazepines versus placebo provide only limited guidance for clinical practice .
BACKGROUND Panic disorder is characterised by recurrent unexpected panic attacks consisting of a wave of intense fear that reaches a peak within a few minutes .
Panic disorder is a common disorder , with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 1 % to 5 % in the general population and a 7 % to 10 % prevalence in primary care setting s. Its aetiology is not fully understood and is probably heterogeneous .
Panic disorder is treated with psychological and pharmacological interventions , often used in combination .
Although benzodiazepines are frequently used in the treatment of panic disorder , guidelines recommend antidepressants , mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) , as first-line treatment for panic disorder , particularly due to their lower incidence of dependence and withdrawal reaction when compared to benzodiazepines .
Despite these recommendations , benzodiazepines are widely used in the treatment of panic disorder , probably because of their rapid onset of action .
OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and acceptability of benzodiazepines versus placebo in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults .