Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colonic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Rectal/Pelvic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Improved Recovery Experience Achieved for Women Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Model Urethral catheter‐less robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Are Valuable in Pancreas Surgery Patients. Expert position paper on the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery Fast‐track surgery: the next revolution in surgical care following laparoscopy The effect of formalizing enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with a protocol. The Effectiveness of Psychosocial Interventions as Adjuncts to Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review Protocol Enhanced Recovery Program following Colorectal Resection in the Elderly Patient Enhanced recovery after liver surgery. Evidence-Based Protocol for Infection Control in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Attenuates Stress and Accelerates Recovery in Patients After Radical Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery: a multicentre study Improving recovery after elective degenerative spine surgery: 5-year experience with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Initial Experiences of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Esophageal Surgery Enhanced Recovery After Colorectal Surgery (ERAS) in Elderly Patients Is Feasible and Achieves Similar Results as in Younger Patients Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery. Processes of Care in Autogenous Breast Reconstruction with Pedicled TRAM Flaps: Expediting Postoperative Discharge in an Ambulatory Setting
Background This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colonic surgery and to provide grade d recommendations for items for an evidence d-based enhanced perioperative protocol . Methods Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses , r and omised controlled trials and large prospect i ve cohorts . For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway , available English- language literature was examined , review ed and grade d. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group . Results For most of the protocol items , recommendations are based on good- quality trials or meta-analyses of good- quality trials ( quality of evidence and recommendations according to the GRADE system ) . Conclusions Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway , the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ) Society , International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition ( IASMEN ) and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism ( ESPEN ) present a comprehensive evidence -based consensus review of perioperative care for colonic surgery Background This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in rectal/pelvic surgery , and to provide grade d recommendations for items for an evidence d-based enhanced recovery protocol . Methods Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses , r and omized controlled trials and large prospect i ve cohorts . For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway , available English- language literature was examined , review ed and grade d. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group . Results For most of the protocol items , recommendations are based on good- quality trials or meta-analyses of good- quality trials ( evidence grade : high or moderate ) . Conclusions Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway , the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ) Society , European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism ( ESPEN ) and International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition ( IASMEN ) present a comprehensive evidence -based consensus review of perioperative care for rectal surgery BACKGROUND & AIMS Protocol s for enhanced recovery provide comprehensive and evidence -based guidelines for best perioperative care . Protocol implementation may reduce complication rates and enhance functional recovery and , as a result of this , also reduce length-of-stay in hospital . There is no comprehensive framework available for pancreaticoduodenectomy . METHODS An international working group constructed within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ® ) Society constructed a comprehensive and evidence -based framework for best perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients . Data were retrieved from st and ard data bases and personal archives . Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the GRADE system and reached through consensus in the group . The quality of evidence was rated " high " , " moderate " , " low " or " very low " . Recommendations were grade d as " strong " or " weak " . RESULTS Comprehensive guidelines are presented . Available evidence is summarised and recommendations given for 27 care items . The quality of evidence varies substantially and further research is needed for many issues to improve the strength of evidence and grade of recommendations . CONCLUSIONS The present evidence -based guidelines provide the necessary platform upon which to base a unified protocol for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy . A unified protocol allows for comparison between centres and across national borders . It facilitates multi-institutional prospect i ve cohort registries and adequately powered r and omised trials Background Protocol s for enhanced recovery provide comprehensive and evidence -based guidelines for best perioperative care . Protocol implementation may reduce complication rates and enhance functional recovery and , as a result of this , also reduce length-of-stay in hospital . There is no comprehensive framework available for pancreaticoduodenectomy . Methods An international working group constructed within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ® ) Society constructed a comprehensive and evidence -based framework for best perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients . Data were retrieved from st and ard data bases and personal archives . Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the GRADE system and reached through consensus in the group . The quality of evidence was rated “ high ” , “ moderate ” , “ low ” or “ very low ” . Recommendations were grade d as “ strong ” or “ weak ” . Results Comprehensive guidelines are presented . Available evidence is summarised and recommendations given for 27 care items . The quality of evidence varies substantially and further research is needed for many issues to improve the strength of evidence and grade of recommendations . Conclusions The present evidence -based guidelines provide the necessary platform upon which to base a unified protocol for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy . A unified protocol allows for comparison between centres and across national borders . It facilitates multi-institutional prospect i ve cohort registries and adequately powered r and omised trials Background : Enhanced recovery after surgery was compared with traditional recovery after surgery for postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction . Methods : Length of stay , emergency room visits , and complications within 30 days of surgery were compared among three groups : traditional recovery after surgery , transition ( some elements of enhanced recovery protocol , not transitioned to outpatient care ) , and enhanced recovery after surgery ( day surgery , provided with st and ardized perioperative education and multimodal analgesia ) . Prospect i ve data collection allowed quality -of-recovery assessment using a vali date d question naire for enhanced recovery/transition groups . Results were statistically analyzed ( analysis of variance/chi-square ) . Results : The traditional recovery , transition , and enhanced recovery cohorts comprised 29 , 11 , and 29 patients , respectively . No significant differences were present regarding age , smoking status , preoperative radiation , single stage direct-to-implant versus tissue exp and er , bilateral versus unilateral surgery , or immediate versus delayed reconstruction among groups . Average length of stay was 1.6 nights in both the traditional recovery and transition groups , compared with 0 nights in the enhanced recovery group ( p < 0.001 ) . Enhanced recovery patients had less severe pain ( p = 0.02 ) and nausea ( p = 0.01 ) , and better enjoyed their food ( p = 0.0002 ) and felt more rested ( p = 0.02 ) than their transition counterparts . There were no differences in the number of emergency room visits among the three groups ( p = 0.88 ) . There was no difference in the rate of hematoma ( p = 0.36 ) , infection requiring intravenous antibiotics ( p = 0.36 ) , or infection requiring explantation ( p = 0.36 ) among the three groups . Conclusion : An enhanced recovery protocol for alloplastic breast reconstruction treated patients safely , with improved patient satisfaction and same-day discharge and with no increase in complications . CLINICAL QUESTION /LEVEL OF EVIDENCE : Therapeutic , III © 2 0 1 0 T H E A U T H O R S J O U R N A L C O M P I L A T I O N © 2 0 1 0 B J U I N T E R N A T I O N A L 1 2 0 1 8 Faiz O , Brown T , Colucci G , Kennedy RH . A cohort study of results following  elective colonic resection  within an enhanced recovery programme . Colorectal Dis 2009 ; 11 : 366–72 9 Lassen K , Soop M , Nygren J et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ) Group Recommendations . Arch Surg 2009 ; 144 : 961–9 10 Halaszynski TM , Juda R , Silverman DG . Optimizing postoperative outcomes with efficient preoperative assessment and management . Crit Care Med 2004 ; 32 ( Suppl . ) : S76–86 11 Guenaga KF , Matos D , Castro AA , Atallah A , Wille-Jorgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery . Cochrane Data base Syst Rev 2005 ; ( 1 ) : CDOO1544 12 Shafii M , Murphy DM , Donovan MG , Hickey DP . Is mechanical bowel preparation necessary in patients undergoing cystectomy and urinary diversion . BJU Int 2002 ; 89 : 879–81 13 Smith AF , Pittaway AJ . Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery : up date of Cochrane Data base Syst Rev 2000 : CD002192 . Cochrane Data base Syst Rev 2003 ; ( 1 ) : CD002192 14 Gerts WH , Pineo GF , Heit JA et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism : the seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy . Chest 2004 ; 126 : 338S–400S 15 Fearon KC , Luff R. The nutritional management of surgical patients : enhanced recovery after surgery . Proc Nutr Soc 2003 ; 62 : 807–11 16 Noblett SE , Watson DS , Huong H , Davison B , Hainsworth PJ , Horgan AF . Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery : a r and omized controlled trial . Colorectal Dis 2006 ; 8 : 563–9 17 Wong PF , Kumar S , Bohra A et al. R and omized clinical trial of perioperative systemic warming in major elective abdominal surgery . Br J Surg 2007 ; 94 : 421–6 18 Ratnaraj J , Kabon B , Talcoff MR , Sessler DI , Kurz A. Supplemental oxygen and carbon dioxide each increase subcutaneous and intestinal intramural oxygenation . Anesth Analg 2004 ; 99 : 207–11 19 Grief R , Akça O , Horn EP , Kurz A , Sessler DI . Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical wound infection . Outcomes Research Group . N Engl J Med 2000 ; 342 : 161–7 20 Grief R , Laciny S , Rapf B , Hickle RS , Sessler DI . Supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of post operative nausea and vomiting . Anesthesiology 1999 ; 91 : 1246–52 21 HTA . Full report : systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of oesophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill and high risk surgical patients . Available at : http:// www.hta.ac.uk/project/.asp . Accessed 5 December 2009 22 Cepeda MS , Carr DB , Mir and a N , Diaz A , Silva C , Morales O. Comparison of morphine , ketorolac , and their combination for postoperative pain : results from a large , r and omised , double blind trial . Anaesthesiology 2005 ; 103 : 1225–32 23 Arumainayagam N , McGrath J , Jefferson KP , Gillatt DA . Introduction of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystectomy . BJU Int 2008 ; 101 : 698–701 24 Pruthi RS , Chun J , Richman M. Reducing time to oral diet and hospital discharge in patients undergoing radical cystectomy using a perioperative care plan . Urology 2003 ; 62 : 661–6 25 Chang SS , Baumgartner RG , Wells N et al. Causes of increased hospital stay after radical cystectomy in a clinical pathway setting . J Urol 2002 ; 167 : 208– BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in implementing comprehensive perioperative protocol s , including preoperative optimization and education , perioperative goal -directed fluid management , and postoperative fast tracking , to enhance recovery after surgery . Data on the outcomes of these protocol s in pancreatic surgery , however , are limited . STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of a prospect ively maintained pancreas surgery data base at a single institution from August 2012 to April 2015 was undertaken . An enhanced recovery protocol was initiated in October 2014 , and patients were divided into groups according to pre protocol or post protocol implementation . Preoperative , intraoperative , and postoperative data were tabulated . Statistical analysis was performed with Student 's t-test and Fisher 's exact tests , as well as e quality of variances where appropriate , using SAS System software ( SAS Institute ) . RESULTS Three hundred and seventy-eight patients ( 181 men , mean age 54 years , BMI 28 kg/m(2 ) ) underwent elective pancreatic surgery during the study period , 297 patients pre protocol and 81 post protocol . There were no significant differences in preoperative or intraoperative characteristics . Mean postoperative length of stay was significantly lower in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group ( 7.4 vs 9.2 days ; p < 0.0001 ) . Hospital costs were similarly lower in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group ( $ 23,307.90 vs $ 27,387.80 ; p < 0.0001 ) . Readmission ( 29 % vs 32 % ) and pancreatic fistula ( 26 % vs 28 % ) rates were similar between groups . Delayed gastric emptying was lower in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group ( 26 % vs 13 % ; p = 0.03 ) . CONCLUSIONS Implementation of an enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery protocol significantly decreased length of stay and hospital cost without increasing readmission or morbidity . Despite patient complexity and the potential need for individualization of care , enhanced recovery protocol s can be valuable and effective in high-risk patient population s , including pancreatic surgery patients Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related bleeding complications and perioperative coronary events are strongly influenced by the management of antithrombotic therapy before and after CABG . Bleeding but also blood products transfusion increase the risk of death and compromise the long-term benefits of CABG.1 The use of new P2Y12 inhibitors , increasing pre-CABG percutaneous coronary interventions ( PCI ) with drug eluting stents ( DES ) requiring specific antiplatelet regimens , and advances in surgical technique has prompted the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis to review the evidence of peri-CABG recommendations on antithrombotic management . Due to the paucity of r and omized trials , most of the evidence is still derived from observational studies and expert consensus , further reinforcing the importance of a multidisciplinary consultation for optimal decision making . # # # Benefits of preoperative aspirin Aspirin ( acetylsalicylic acid , ASA ) is recommended as secondary prevention therapy for all patients with proven coronary artery disease ( CAD ) and without contraindications . Its indication is even stronger for post-CABG patients ( recommendation IA).2 The general consensus is that ASA treatment withdrawal has ominous prognostic implication s in patients with CAD , especially in those with intracoronary stents , and should be advocated only when the bleeding risk clearly outweighs that of atherothrombotic events.3 The benefits of continuing ASA until the day of CABG ( ‘ preoperative ASA ’ ) are less clear and may explain the wide variability in the management of ASA therapy in the perioperative period and differences between guidelines endorsed by different professional and scientific societies ( Supplementary material online , Table S1 ) . This was based on the demonstration that ASA started the day before surgery was no more effective than ASA started 6 h after surgery at improving early ( 7- to 10-day ) graft patency , but was associated with increased bleeding complications.4 More recent evidence suggests , however , that ASA use within 5–7 days prior to CABG Fast-track surgery , also named enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) , is in my opinion the most important innovation after the advent of laparoscopy ( in the 1990s ) in the field of  colorectal surgery  ( as in other fields of surgery ) . It is defined as a multimodal pathway aim ing to reduce surgical stress by using pain-free procedures with less organ dysfunction , less morbidity and better recovery . ERAS has been popularized by Henrik Kehlet and his team since the early 2000s [ 1 ] and has rapidly gained popularity around the world because of its remarkable benefits and safety . The concept of ERAS is to make use of the improvement of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques , the development of minimally invasive surgery and evidence -based perioperative care . It involves a number of items , beginning from the first medical visit before surgery to discharge . The items are all evidence based being derived from r and omized controlled trials or meta-analyses . The reader can find the references related to the ERAS items in the valuable consensus review published by the European ERAS group [ 2 ] and the paper of Kehlet and Wilmore [ 3 ] . Through this pathway , the patient can benefit from the best available evidence in anaesthesia , analgesia , perioperative fluid management , surgical procedures , nutrition and ambulation . I will focus in this editorial on the role of ERAS in colorectal surgery , but readers should be aware that ERAS has been applied and vali date d in other abdominal procedures , and in urology , gynaecology , vascular sugery , endocrine surgery , orthopaedic surgery , etc . [ 3 ] . The numerous items or components ( Figure 1 ) involve the preoperative , intra-operative and postoperative periods , necessitating close collaboration between surgeons ( no bowel preparation , no routine nasogastric tube , minimally invasive surgery , no routine abdominal drainage and early postoperative diet ) , anaesthesiologists ( fasting duration of two hours for liquids and six hours for solids , carbohydrate loading , no routine preoperative sedation , avoiding long-acting opioids , epidural analgesia , preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting , preventing intra-operative hypothermia , perioperative fluid restriction and postoperative analgesia ) and nurses and physiotherapists ( early nutrition and mobilisation ) . Several r and omized trials and four meta-analyses [ 4–7 ] have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ERAS , not only in reducing total length of hospital stay and morbidity , but also in improving patient satisfaction when compared with conventional care . The metaanalyses included both r and omized and non-r and omized studies , the most recent and the largest [ 6 ] showing a reduction of 2.5 days in total hospital stay and significantly less morbidity ( OR 0.54 [ 0.45–0.69 ] ) in favour of the ERAS group , with no difference in readmission rate . A recent meta- analysis focusing on major colorectal surgery demonstrated that the ERAS programme can reduce morbidity by up to 50 % [ 7 ] . ERAS raises three questions . ( i ) What is the respective role of each ERAS item ? ( ii ) Does the ERAS protocol increase the workload of ward nursing staff ? ( iii ) How should this new paradigm be implemented ? Several anaesthesiologists are reluctant to use epidural analgesia in daily practice , mainly when patients are undergoing laparoscopic surgery . Epidural analgesia ( well known to be associated with less pain ) during laparoscopic surgery has been assessed in meta-analyses and r and omized trials but the conclusions are not concordant [ 8,9 ] . In my own daily practice , epidural analgesia is safe and efficacious in relieving pain and allowing early oral intake and mobilization , but it is obvious that its proper role in the ERAS protocol compared with other analgesic regimens such as non-opioid multimodal analgesia , local anaesthesia and continuous wound perfusion , in the era of laparoscopic surgery needs further evaluation . The roleof laparoscopyhas also been debated [ 10 ] . Two small r and omized trials have shown conflicting results [ 11,12 ] , but a recent large r and omized trial [ 13 ] involving four arms ( laparoscopy with ERAS vs laparoscopy with conventional care , vs open surgery with ERAS vs open surgery with conventional care ) has demonstrated a shorter hospital stay after laparoscopic colonic surgery with ERAS , the other outcomes being similar . The conclusion of the authors was that ‘ the most optimal perioperative treatment for patients requiring segmental colectomy for coloncancer is laparoscopic resection embedded in an ERAS program ’ , suggesting that laparoscopic surgery is an important component of ERAS . The same team has performed a futher multivariate linear regression analysis on the same data and showed that the components significantly associated with a successful ERAS programme were laparoscopic surgery , normal diet at postoperative days one , two and three and enforced mobilization at postoperative days one , two and three ( Vlug M , personal communication ) . There is a feeling that the ERAS programme could increase the workload of nursing staff . The nursing Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) pathways aim to accelerate functional return and discharge from hospital . They have proven effective in many forms of surgery , most notably colorectal . However , experience in esophagectomy has been limited . A recent study reported significant reductions in pulmonary complications , mortality , and length of stay following the introduction of an ERAS protocol alone , without the introduction of any clinical changes . We instituted a similar change 16 months ago , introducing a protocol to provide a formal framework , for our existing postoperative care . This retrospective analysis compared outcome following esophagectomy for the 16 months before and 20 months after this change . Data were collected from prospect ively maintained secure web-based multidisciplinary data bases . Complication severity was classified using the Clavien-Dindo scale . Operative mortality was defined as death within 30 days of surgery , or at any point during the same hospital admission . Lower respiratory tract infection was defined as clinical evidence of infection , with or without radiological signs . Respiratory complications included lower respiratory tract infection , pleural effusion ( irrespective of drainage ) , pulmonary collapse , and pneumothorax . Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v21 . One hundred thirty-two patients underwent esophagectomy ( 55 protocol group ; 77 before ) . All were performed open . There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age , gender , operation , use of neoadjuvant therapy , cell type , stage , tumor site , or American Society of Anesthesiologists grade . Median length of stay was 14.0 days ( protocol ) compared with 12.0 before ( interquartile range 9 - 19 and 9.5 - 15.5 , respectively ; P = 0.073 , Mann-Whitney U-test ) . Readmission within 30 days of discharge occurred in five ( 9.26 % ) and six ( 8.19 % ; P = 1.000 , Fisher 's exact test ) . There were four in-hospital deaths ( 3.03 % ) : one ( 1.82 % ) and three ( 3.90 % ) , respectively ( P = 0.641 ) . There were no differences in the severity of complications ( P = non-significant ; Pearson 's chi-squared ) . There were no differences in the type of complications occurring in either group . The protocol was completed successfully by 26 ( 47.3 % ) . No baseline factors were predictive of this . In contrast to previous studies , we did not demonstrate any improvement in outcome by formalizing our existing pathway using a written protocol . Consequently , improvements in short-term outcome from esophagectomy within ERAS would seem to be primarily due to improvements in components of perioperative care . Consequently , we would recommend that centers introducing new ( or review ing existing ) ERAS pathways for esophagectomy focus on optimizing clinical aspects of such st and ardized pathways AIMS Pain and anxiety are commonly reported among those undergoing orthopaedic surgery . Improvement in anxiety and pain control might be achieved by supplementing st and ard care with psychological interventions . However , the effectiveness of adjunctive psychosocial interventions in anxiety and pain control have not been addressed sufficiently by previous systematic review s in orthopaedic surgeries . The present study aim ed to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive psychosocial techniques to improve perioperative clinical care in orthopaedic surgery , to identify the most effective intervention types and to evaluate potential moderators . METHODS We will perform a systematic review and meta- analysis to address the study aims . PubMed , PsycINFO , CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses will be search ed between 1980 and 2015 . Prospect i ve controlled clinical trials completed in adults , contrasting st and ard care and st and ard care supplemented with psychosocial methods  , will be eligible for inclusion . Effectiveness will be assessed through the outcomes of postoperative pain intensity , analgesic requirement , perioperative anxiety , quality of life and postoperative recovery . The results of a r and om-effect meta- analysis will be reported . To aid implementation of best practice , moderating effects of the type and timing of psychosocial intervention , type of surgical intervention and type of anaesthesia will be evaluated through meta-regression . Sensitivity analyses and subgroup contrasts will follow as necessary . DISCUSSION Recommendations will be made to improve medical care in orthopaedic procedures . The quality of evidence will be rated using GRADE criteria . Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons , Background The enhanced recovery program ( ERP ) aims to reduce the metabolic response to surgery , hastening recovery and shortening hospital stay . Concerns exist regarding morbidity and hospital stay in elderly patients . The present study aim ed to compare the outcomes and compliance of elderly patients managed by an ERP protocol with a younger group . Methods A review was performed of a prospect i ve data base of patients undergoing colorectal resection managed under the ERP protocol between 2005 and 2010 . Patients were grouped into < 80 years and ≥80 years , and perioperative data were collated . The postoperative outcomes were compared with the goals set out by the ERP protocol . Results A total of 688 patients were included , 558 were < 80 years ( median : 66 years ; range : 17–79 years ) and 130 were ≥80 years ( median : 83 years ; range : 80–95 years ) . Some 96 % of operations were planned laparoscopically . Median total length of hospital stay was 6 days ( range : 1–108 days ) for the < 80 year group and 8 days ( range : 1–167 days ; P 0.363 ) for the elderly group , with a 30 day readmission rate of 8.6 % for the population and no significant differences between groups . The 30 day mortality was 5 % , with a significant difference between the two groups ( P < 0.0001 ) . Differences in protocol adherence were identified in the discontinuation of intravenous fluids , catheter removal , and early mobilization . Conclusions An enhanced recovery program is feasible for colorectal surgery patients ≥80 years of age , with similar compliance as the younger group to some aspects of the protocol and an acceptable readmission rate . Attention to improving compliance in the postoperative phase is necessary , particularly in such high-risk patients , as such improvement may reduce the morbidity and mortality INTRODUCTION In a majority of cases , enhanced recovery after surgery program ( ERP ) leads to a reduced rate of postoperative complications and shortened hospital stays following digestive surgery . The program 's preoperative , perioperative and postoperative measures are implemented by the members of a motivated multidisciplinary team . Having shown its merits in digestive surgery , ERP would be particularly useful in liver surgery due to the elevated rates of morbidity and mortality this type of operation continues to entail . The objective of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of ERP  in liver surgery . METHOD This is a systematic narrative review of the literature on the efficacy of ERP  in liver surgery by laparotomy or laparoscopy . RESULTS Notwithst and ing a number of studies ( n=30 : 5 r and omized trials , 14 cohort studies and 11 meta-analyses ) less sizable than with regard to digestive surgery in general and colorectal surgery in particular , analysis of the literature confirms that in liver surgery , ERP is associated with an overall decrease in complications by 30 to 60 % , but without improvement in the rates of hospital readmission and postoperative mortality . All of the studies report a reduction in average length of stay ( ALOS ) by 2.3 days and in functional recovery , a more objective indicator than ALOS , by 2.5 days . As of now , the economic impact of the ERP programs in liver surgery is neither positive nor negative , the above-mentioned savings being counterbalanced by heightened costs for material and equipment . Laparoscopic surgery is independently associated with better outcomes in terms of complications , functional recovery and ALOS ; that is why it is important to incorporate this surgical approach in ERP as often as possible . Given a lack of robust evidence , Prehabilitation , which is a preoperative optimization process leading to improved functional reserve , has yet to be assigned a place in ERP programs pertaining to liver surgery . Possible roadblocks to application of an ERP program can be overcome through coordination by a team leader , a motivated multidisciplinary team , training courses and dedicated teaching sessions . CONCLUSION ERP is a care improvement process that has a major play to play in organization of liver surgery , and its large-scale application is to be recommended Abstract Immediate breast implant reconstruction has among the highest incidence of infections in plastic surgery . A literature search returned key articles that showed a significant decrease in surgical-site infections by performing nasal swab evaluation to treat methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus before surgery with mupirocin nasal ointment and 5 days of chlorhexidine scrub to the surgical area . Additional Level 1 data supported the use of chlorhexidine-alcohol over povidone-iodine solutions for skin preparation . Intraoperative data on breast pocket irrigation showed the benefits of povidone-iodine as well as a triple antibiotic solution . Nasal swabs from 120 patients showed no methicillin-resistant S. aureus but did identify 10 patients with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus , 1 with streptococcus , and 3 with gram-negative rods , which changed perioperative antibiotic management . On the basis of the previously mentioned data , an evidence -based protocol for infection control was developed to potentially decrease infection rates . Further cost and efficacy data are warranted BACKGROUND & AIMS Evidence of the advantages of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) protocol s following pancreaticoduodenectomy ( PD ) is limited . The aim of this study was to examine the efficiency of ERAS protocol s in patients following PD . METHODS Between June 2014 and October 2016 , patients undergoing PD were r and omly assigned to receive ERAS protocol s or st and ard care . The primary endpoint was the postoperative length of stay . Secondary endpoints included postoperative complications , postoperative quality -of-life ( QoR-40J ) , readmission , and medical cost . RESULTS Of 80 eligible patients , 74 were analyzed in intention-to-treat principles : 37 in the control group and 37 in the ERAS group . The mean length of stay in the ERAS group was significantly shorter than that in the control group ( 20.1 ± 5.4 vs 26.9 ± 13.5 days , P < 0.001 ) . The ERAS group had a significantly lower percentage of postoperative complications ( 32.4 % vs 56.8 % , P = 0.034 ) and readmissions ( 0 % vs 8.1 % , P = 0.038 ) . Quality -of-life was also significantly better in the ERAS group ( 184 ± 12.4 vs 177 ± 14.5 , P = 0.022 ) . The total medical cost was lower in the ERAS group , but not significantly ( $ 25,445 ± 5065 vs $ 28,384 ± 9999 , P = 0.085 ) . CONCLUSIONS The optimization of ERAS protocol s in patients undergoing PD  is safe and accelerates perioperative recovery and quality -of-life , thereby reducing the length of stay . Morbidity was significantly decreased in the ERAS group without compromising surgical outcome . REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000014068 Background The aim of this trial was to compare the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ) program with conventional perioperative management in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer . Methods A combination of evidence -based and consensus methodology was used to develop the ERAS protocol . Five hundred ninety-seven consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal resection were r and omized to either the ERAS ( n = 299 ) or the  control group ( n = 298 ) . Outcomes relating to nutrition and metabolism index , stress index , and recovery index were measured and recorded . Results Demographic and operative data were similar between the two groups . Patients in the ERAS group showed improved nutritional status when compared with those of the control group . On postoperative day ( POD ) 1 , the HOMA-IR ( insulin resistance index ) of the ERAS group was lower than that of the control group ( p < 0.001 ) . The cortisol level of the control group was elevated on both POD 1 ( p = 0.007 ) and POD 5 ( p = 0.002 ) compared to the preoperative level . However , the cortisol level of the ERAS group was not increased until POD 5 ( p = 0.001 ) . Reduced levels of TNF-α , IL-1β , IL-6 , and IFN-γ in the ERAS group indicated less postoperative stress responses . In addition , ERAS was associated with accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal function . The postoperative length of stay ( p < 0.001 ) and expense ( p < 0.001 ) for the ERAS group were reduced in comparison to the controls . Twenty-eight cases in the control group and twenty-nine in the ERAS group suffered complications , which was not significantly different . Conclusion The ERAS protocol attenuates the surgical stress response and accelerates postoperative recovery without compromising patient safety INTRODUCTION Colorectal surgery has been associated with a complication rate of 15 - 20 % and mean post-operative inpatient stays of 6 - 11 days . The principles of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) are well established and have been developed to optimise peri-operative care and facilitate discharge . The purpose of this systematic review is to present an up date d review of peri-operative care in colorectal surgery from the available evidence and ERAS group recommendations . METHODS Systematic search es of the PubMed and Embase ™ data bases and the Cochrane library were conducted . A h and search of bibliographies of identified studies was conducted to identify any additional articles missed by the initial search strategy . RESULTS A total of 59 relevant studies were identified . These included six r and omised controlled trials and seven clinical controlled trials that fulfilled the inclusion criteria . These studies showed reductions in duration of inpatient stays in the ERAS groups compared with more traditional care as well as reductions in morbidity and mortality rates . CONCLUSIONS Review ing the data reveals that ERAS protocol s have a role in reducing post-operative morbidity and result in an accelerated recovery following colorectal surgery . Similarly , both primary and overall hospital stays are reduced significantly . However , the available evidence suggests that ERAS protocol s do not reduce hospital readmissions or mortality . These findings help to confirm that ERAS protocol s should now be implemented as the st and ard approach for peri-operative care in colorectal surgery Background Major colorectal surgery usually requires a hospital stay of more than 12 days . Inadequate pain management , intestinal dysfunction and immobilisation are the main factors associated with delay in recovery . The present work assesses the short and medium term results achieved by an enhanced recovery program based on previously published protocol s. Methods This prospect i ve study , performed at 12 Spanish hospitals in 2008 and 2009 , involved 300 patients . All patients underwent elective colorectal resection for cancer following an enhanced recovery program .  The main elements of this program were : preoperative advice , no colon preparation , provision of carbohydrate-rich drinks one day prior and on the morning of surgery , goal directed fluid administration , body temperature control during surgery , avoiding drainages and nasogastric tubes , early mobilisation , and the taking of oral fluids in the early postoperative period . Perioperative morbidity and mortality data were collected and the length of hospital stay and protocol compliance recorded . Results The median age of the patients was 68 years . Fifty-two % of the patients were women . The distribution of patients by ASA class was : I 10 % , II 50 % and III 40 % . Sixty-four % of interventions were laparoscopic ; 15 % required conversion to laparotomy . The majority of patients underwent sigmoidectomy or right hemicolectomy .  The overall compliance to protocol was approximately 65 % , but varied widely in its different components . The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 6 days . Some 3 % of patients were readmitted to hospital after discharge ; some 7 % required repeat surgery during their initial hospitalisation or after readmission . The most common complications were surgical ( 24 % ) , followed by septic ( 11 % ) or other medical complications ( 10 % ) . Three patients ( 1 % ) died during follow-up . Some 31 % of patients suffered symptoms that delayed their discharge , the most common being vomiting or nausea ( 12 % ) , dyspnoea ( 7 % ) and fever ( 5 % ) . Conclusion The following of this enhanced recovery program posed no risk to patients in terms of morbidity , mortality and shortened the length of their hospital stay . Overall compliance to protocol was 65 % . The following of this program was of benefit to patients and reduces costs by shortening the length of hospital stay . The implantation of such programmes is therefore highly recommended OBJECTIVE Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) has led to a paradigm shift in various surgical specialties . Its application can result in substantial benefits in perioperative healthcare utilization through preoperative physical and mental patient optimization and modulation of the recovery process . Still , ERAS remains relatively new to spine surgery . The authors report their 5-year experience , focusing on ERAS application to a broad population of patients with degenerative spine conditions undergoing elective surgical procedures , including anterior lumbar interbody fusion ( ALIF ) . METHODS A multimodal ERAS protocol was applied between November 2013 and October 2018 . The authors analyze hospital stay , perioperative outcomes , readmissions , and adverse events obtained from a prospect i ve institutional registry .  Elective tubular microdiscectomy and mini-open decompression as well as minimally invasive ( MI ) anterior or posterior fusion cases were included . Their institutional ERAS protocol contains 22 pre- , intra- , and postoperative elements , including preoperative patient counseling , MI techniques , early mobilization and oral intake , minimal postoperative restrictions , and regular audits . RESULTS A total of 2592 consecutive patients were included , with 199 ( 8 % ) undergoing fusion . The mean hospital stay was 1.1 ± 1.2 days , with 20 ( 0.8 % ) 30-day and 36 ( 1.4 % ) 60-day readmissions . Ninety-four percent of patients were discharged after a maximum 1-night hospital stay . Over the 5-year period , a clear trend toward a higher proportion of patients discharged home after a 1-night stay was observed ( p < 0.001 ) , with a concomitant decrease in adverse events in the overall cohort ( p = 0.025 ) and without increase in readmissions . For fusion procedures , the rate of 1-night hospital stays increased from 26 % to 85 % ( p < 0.001 ) . Similarly , the average length of hospital stay decreased steadily from 2.4 ± 1.2 days to 1.5 ± 0.3 days ( p < 0.001 ) , with a notable concomitant decrease in variance , result ing in an estimated reduction in nursing costs of 46.8 % . CONCLUSIONS Application of an ERAS protocol over 5 years to a diverse population of patients undergoing surgical procedures , including ALIF , for treatment of degenerative spine conditions was safe and effective , without increase in readmissions . The data from this large case series stress the importance of the multidisciplinary , iterative improvement process to overcome the learning curve associated with ERAS implementation , and the importance of a dedicated perioperative care team . Prospect i ve trials are needed to evaluate spinal ERAS on a higher level of evidence Background A recent development in gastrointestinal surgery is the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs . Evidence regarding the benefit of these programs in patients undergoing esophageal surgery is scarce . We investigated the feasibility and possible benefit of a perioperative ERAS program in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignant disease . Methods The ERAS program was initiated in 2009 . Patients who underwent esophagectomy and were treated according to the ERAS program were included . Items of ERAS included preoperative nutrition , early extubation , early removal of nasogastric tube , and early mobilization . Primary outcome parameters were hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications . Outcome parameters in the ERAS cohort were compared to a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection in the year prior to the implementation of the ERAS protocol . A feasibility analysis was performed among a sample of ERAS patients to determine the number of achieved items per patient . Results Between 2008 and August 2010 , 181 patients in our department underwent esophagectomy .  Of these , 103 patients were included in the ERAS program ( ERAS+ group ) and were compared to 78 patients who had undergone an esophagectomy in 2008 ( ERAS– group ) .  Overall hospital stay was 14 days versus 15 days ( ERAS+ and ERAS– , respectively ; p = 0.013 ) . There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications in either group . The percentage of achieved items varied between 42 and 93 % per item . Conclusions The implementation of an ERAS program in esophageal surgery was feasible and result ed in a small but significant reduction in overall hospital stay , whereas overall morbidity was not affected Aim : Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) is a multimodal approach that aims to optimize perioperative treatment . Whether elderly patients receiving colorectal surgery can adhere to and benefit from an ERAS approach is uncertain . The aim of this study was to compare patients in different age groups participating in an ERAS program .  Method : In this sub study of a r and omized controlled trial , we analyzed the interventional ERAS arm of adult patients eligible for laparoscopic or open colorectal resection with regard to the importance of age . Patients were divided into three groups based on age : ≤65 years ( n = 79 ) , 66 - 79 years ( n = 56 ) , and ≥80 years ( n = 19 ) . The primary end point was total postoperative hospital stay ( THS ) . Secondary end points were postoperative hospital stay , postoperative complications , postoperative C-reactive protein levels , readmission rate , mortality , and patient adherence to the different  ERAS elements . All parameters and measuring the adherence to the ERAS protocol were recorded before surgery , on the day of the operation , and daily until discharge . Results : There were no significant differences in length of THS between age groups ( ≤65 years , median 5 [ range 2 - 47 ] days ; 66 - 79 years , median 5.5 [ range 2 - 36 ] days ; ≥80 years , median 7 [ range 3 - 50 ] days ; p = .53 ) . All secondary outcomes were similar between age groups . Patient adherence to the ERAS protocol was as good in the elderly as it was in the younger patients . Conclusion : Elderly patients adhered to and benefited from an ERAS program , similar to their younger counterparts BACKGROUND The aim of this trial was to compare multimodal optimization with conventional perioperative management in a consecutive series of patients undergoing gastrectomy procedures . METHODS According to r and omized controlled studies and conclusions made by meta-analyses in colorectal surgery , optimized perioperative measures were design ed and applied in gastrectomy surgery . Thirty-three patients were r and omized to the optimized group and 30 patients to a control group .  Two groups were treated in 1 center by a single surgical team in different wards . Both groups used patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative analgesia . The primary end point was length of postoperative hospital stay . Secondary outcomes included bowel function recovery after surgery , perioperative changes of inflammatory factors , glucocorticoid , insulin resistance , and body composition . Perioperative complications and adverse events were also recorded . RESULTS The groups were similar in terms of age , sex ratio , and Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity ( POSSUM score ) . The optimized group was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay compared with the conventional care group ( P < .001 ) . Duration s of urinary catheterization and abdominal drainage were also less ( P < .001 ) . The diet program in the optimization group was well tolerated and was associated with an earlier recovery of gut function ( P < .001 ) . Proinflammatory factors were less elevated and body composition was more stable in the optimized group than in controls . There were no differences in morbidity or mortality between the groups . CONCLUSIONS Optimization of care in gastrectomy can shorten postoperative hospital stay and provides multiple beneficial outcomes , including hastening the return of gut function , without increasing morbidity Background : A multidisciplinary patient care plan was developed to facilitate early discharge following autogenous breast reconstruction and included ( 1 ) preadmission patient education , ( 2 ) perioperative multimodal pain management , ( 3 ) intraoperative nerve blocks , and ( 4 ) postdischarge telephone advice . This study evaluated the success of this care plan in the first 18 months after its implementation . Methods : A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive women undergoing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous ( TRAM ) flap breast reconstruction ( November of 2009 to May of 2011 ) was performed . The primary outcome was time to discharge ; secondary outcomes included complications , readmission , and self-report pain at discharge . Predictors of discharge time were analyzed using stepwise multivariable regression modeling . Results : Ninety-one women ( mean age , 50.0 ± 8.5 years ) underwent pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction ( 76 percent unilateral and 81 percent delayed ) , with 77 percent receiving the intended multimodal analgesia protocol . Mean time to discharge was 38.7 ± 27.6 hours . Overall , 40 percent of patients were discharged within 24 hours , but successful early discharge increased significantly over the study period . Key predictors of shorter time to discharge were use of multimodal analgesia , lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class , and surgery more than 6 months after implementation of the care plan . Conclusions : The authors ’ initial experience has supported the safety and feasibility of expedited discharge following pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction , with adherence to the authors ’ care plan improving steadily over the study period . Multimodal pain management proved a key modifiable factor in facilitating early discharge . A prospect i ve study is currently underway to evaluate patient-reported quality of recovery following ambulatory surgery in this population . CLINICAL QUESTION /LEVEL OF EVIDENCE : Therapeutic , IV
Key recommendations support use of  opioid-sparing perioperative medications  , minimal preoperative fasting and early feeding , use of anesthetic techniques that decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain , use of measures to prevent intraoperative hypothermia , and support of early mobilization after surgery .
Background : Enhanced recovery following surgery can be achieved through the introduction of evidence -based perioperative maneuvers .
This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery  and to provide evidence -based recommendations for an enhanced perioperative protocol .