Global Risk Assessment to Guide Blood Pressure Management in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention A multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management in Australian primary healthcare: a protocol for a process evaluation Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a randomised trial of training in information management, evidence-based medicine, both or neither: the PIER trial. The Treatment of cardiovascular Risk in Primary care using Electronic Decision suppOrt (TORPEDO) study: intervention development and protocol for a cluster randomised, controlled trial of an electronic decision support and quality improvement intervention in Australian primary healthcare The impact of a point-of-care testing device on CVD risk assessment completion in New Zealand primary-care practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial and qualitative investigation Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to improve cardiovascular risk management in primary care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial The South Asian Heart Lifestyle Intervention (SAHELI) study to improve cardiovascular risk factors in a community setting: design and methods. Improving diabetes care: multi-component cardiovascular disease risk reduction strategies for people with diabetes in South Asia--the CARRS multi-center translation trial. National Study of Physician Awareness and Adherence to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on screening for cardiovascular disease risk in a primary prevention population: a cross-sectional study Does training of general practitioners for intensive treatment of people with screen-detected diabetes have a spillover effect on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in ‘at risk’ individuals with normoglycaemia? Results from the ADDITION-Denmark cluster-randomised controlled trial Cost-Effectiveness of the Diabetes Care Protocol, a Multifaceted Computerized Decision Support Diabetes Management Intervention That Reduces Cardiovascular Risk NHS health checks through general practice: randomised trial of population cardiovascular risk reduction Designing an Internet-Based Multidomain Intervention for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: The HATICE Trial. Quality of cardiovascular disease preventive care and physician/practice characteristics Effects on cardiovascular disease risk of a web-based health risk assessment with tailored health advice: a follow-up study Cost-effectiveness of interventions to control cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Asia: protocol for a systematic review The systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE) for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Does evidence exist for its effectiveness? A systematic review The Effectiveness of Pharmacist Interventions on Cardiovascular Risk: The Multicenter Randomized Controlled RxEACH Trial. Efficacy of a nurse-led email reminder program for cardiovascular prevention risk reduction in hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk predicted by different SCORE equations: The Netherlands as an example Lifestyle‐Based Prediction Model for the Prevention of CVD: The Healthy Heart Score Cardiovascular disease risk reduction in rural China: a clustered randomized controlled trial in Zhejiang
Elevated blood pressure ( BP ) is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) . Epidemiological analyses have established the grade d and continuous association between higher BP and CVD . Moreover , r and omized clinical trials among individuals with hypertension have demonstrated , in aggregate , a reduction in CVD events by 20 % , coronary heart disease ( CHD ) by 17 % , stroke by 27 % , and heart failure by 28 % for every 10 mm Hg systolic BP ( SBP ) lowering with medical therapy.1 Therefore , prevention , detection , treatment , and control of elevated BP , and its clinical correlate hypertension , is an important public health priority and a primary target for CVD prevention . Although national health surveys have demonstrated improvements in hypertension awareness and treatment , strategic opportunities to improve the efficiency and efficacy of applying BP-lowering therapy in patients most likely to benefit remain.2 Global CVD risk assessment , using multivariable prediction models that estimate absolute CVD risk from routinely measured clinical variables , has been promulgated in several CVD prevention guidelines for cholesterol management to target the most intensive preventive therapies to those at highest absolute CVD risk.3–5 Hypertension guidelines , however , have instead relied solely on isolated BP thresholds and BP goals to guide treatment initiation and intensity . In this review , we provide a rationale for incorporating global CVD risk assessment in BP treatment decision-making and propose a framework to guide its implementation in future CVD prevention guidelines . Epidemiological analyses have firmly established that CVD is a multifactorial condition and that modest increases of several CVD risk factors can often lead to greater overall risk than a severe elevation of a Background Cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide . Despite the widespread availability of evidence -based clinical guidelines and vali date d risk predication equations for prevention and management of CVD , their translation into routine practice is limited . We developed a multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management which incorporates electronic decision support , patient risk communication tools , computerised audit and feedback tools , and monthly , peer-ranked performance feedback via a web portal . The intervention was implemented in a cluster r and omised controlled trial in 60 primary healthcare services in Australia . Overall , there were improvements in risk factor recording and in prescribing of recommended treatments among under-treated individuals , but it is unclear how this intervention was used in practice and what factors promoted or hindered its use . This information is necessary to optimise intervention impact and maximally implement it in a post-trial context . In this study protocol , we outline our methods to conduct a theory-based , process evaluation of the intervention . Our aims are to underst and how , why , and for whom the intervention produced the observed outcomes and to develop effective strategies for translation and dissemination . Methods / Design We will conduct four discrete but inter-related studies taking a mixed methods approach . Our quantitative studies will examine ( 1 ) the longer term effectiveness of the intervention post-trial , ( 2 ) patient and health service level correlates with trial outcomes , and ( 3 ) the health economic impact of implementing the intervention at scale . The qualitative studies will ( 1 ) identify healthcare provider perspectives on implementation barriers and enablers and ( 2 ) use video ethnography and patient semi-structured interviews to underst and how cardiovascular risk is communicated in the doctor/patient interaction both with and without the use of intervention . We will also assess the costs of implementing the intervention in Australian primary healthcare setting s which will inform scale-up considerations . Discussion This mixed methods evaluation will provide a detailed underst and ing of the process of implementing a  quality improvement intervention and identify the factors that might influence scalability and sustainability . Trials registration 12611000478910 BACKGROUND Sub-optimal management of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) patients is widespread in primary and secondary care , with risk factors frequently unrecorded or untreated . AIM To investigate the effectiveness of educational interventions developed in primary care , on recording , prescribing and control of risk factors among all patients recorded by their general practitioner as having CVD . DESIGN OF STUDY Factorial , duster-r and omised controlled trial . SETTING Primary care teams representing the range of practice development in a geographically defined area in inner London . METHOD Participating practice s were r and omly allocated to one of the four intervention groups : information , evidence , both or neither . Interventions were tailored to suit individual practice needs . At a mean of 19 months after baseline , and three months after the end of intervention , practice s carried out the follow-up assessment of recording , treatment , and control of risk factors in the same CVD patients . RESULTS Adequate recording of all three risk factors , found inapproximately a third of patients at baseline , increased non-significantly by 10.5 % ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] = 3.9 to 24.9 ) in the information ( versus not information ) group and by 6.6 % ( 95 % [ CI ] = 8.9 to 22.0 ) in the evidence ( versus not evidence ) group . Factorial improvements in prescribing and control of risk factors tended not to be significant . Adequate recording of an three risk factors showed the greatest improvement in the information plus evidence group ( 19.9 % increase , P for heterogeneity across the four groups < or = 0.001 ) . Mean change from baseline to follow-up within the four intervention groups suggested improvements in the combined information plus evidence group in cholesterol recording ( 22.5 % increase ) , prescribing of lipid lowering drugs ( 4.4 % increase ) and mean cholesterol ( 0.7 mmol/l decrease ) . CONCLUSIONS Adequate risk factor recording did not differ between the information ( versus not information ) or the evidence ( versus not evidence ) intervention groups . Combined training in information systems and evidence -based medicine should be considered in the design of future interventions , to improve secondary prevention of CVD Background Large gaps exist in the implementation of guideline recommendations for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk management .  Electronic decision support ( EDS ) systems are promising interventions to close these gaps but few have undergone clinical trial evaluation in Australia . We have developed HealthTracker , a multifaceted EDS and quality improvement intervention to improve the management of CVD risk . Methods / design It is hypothesised that the use of HealthTracker over a 12-month period will result in : ( 1 ) an increased proportion of patients receiving guideline -indicated measurements of CVD risk factors and ( 2 ) an increased proportion of patients at high risk will receive guideline -indicated prescriptions for lowering their CVD risk . Sixty health services ( 40 general practice s and 20 Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services ( ACCHSs ) will be r and omised in a 1:1 allocation to receive either the intervention package or continue with usual care , stratified by service type , size and participation in existing quality improvement initiatives . The intervention consists of point-of-care decision support ; a risk communication interface ; a clinical audit tool to assess performance on CVD-related indicators ; a quality improvement component comprising peer-ranked data feedback and support to develop strategies to improve performance .  The control arm will continue with usual care without access to these intervention components . Quantitative data will be derived from cross-sectional sample s at baseline and end of study via automated data extraction . Detailed process and economic evaluations will also be conducted . Ethics and dissemination The general practice component of the study is approved by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee ( HREC ) and the ACCHS component is approved by the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council HREC . Formal agreements with each of the participating sites have been signed . In addition to the usual scientific forums , results will be disseminated via newsletters , study websites , face-to-face feedback forums and workshops . Trial registration The trial is registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611000478910 Objectives To assess the effect of a point of care ( POC ) device for testing lipids  and HbA1c in addition to testing by community laboratory facilities ( usual practice ) on the completion of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk assessment s in general practice . Methods We conducted a pragmatic , cluster r and omised controlled trial in 20 New Zeal and general practice s stratified by size and rurality and r and omised to POC device plus usual practice or usual practice alone ( controls ) . Patients aged 35–79 years were eligible if they met national guideline criteria for CVD risk assessment . Data on CVD risk assessment s were aggregated using a web-based decision support programme common to each practice . Data entered into the on-line CVD risk assessment form could be saved pending blood test results . The primary outcome was the proportion of completed CVD risk assessment s. Qualitative data on practice processes for CVD risk assessment and feasibility of POC testing were collected at the end of the study by interviews and question naire . The POC testing was supported by a comprehensive quality assurance programme . Results A CVD risk assessment entry was recorded for 7421 patients in 10 POC practice s and 6217 patients in 10 control practice s ; 99.5 % of CVD risk assessment s had complete data in both groups ( adjusted odds ratio 1.02 [ 95%CI 0.61–1.69 ] ) . There were major external influences that affected the trial : including a national performance target for CVD risk assessment and changes to CVD guidelines . All practice s had invested in systems and dedicated staff time to identify and follow up patients to completion . However , the POC device was viewed by most as an additional tool rather than as an opportunity to review practice work flow and leverage the immediate test results for patient education and CVD risk management discussion s. Shortly after commencement , the trial was halted due to a change in the HbA1c test assay performance . The trial restarted after the manufacturing issue was rectified but this affected the end use of the device . Conclusions Performance incentives and external influences were more powerful modifiers of practice behaviours than the POC device in relation to CVD risk assessment completion . The promise of combining risk assessment , communication and management within one consultation was not realised . With shifts in policy focus , the utility of POC devices for patient engagement in CVD preventive care may be demonstrated if fully integrated into the clinical setting . Trial registration Australian New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) is an important worldwide cause of mortality . In The Netherl and s , CVD is the leading cause of death for women and the second cause of death for men . Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of CVD are not well implemented in primary care . In this study , we aim to examine the effectiveness of a tailored implementation program targeted at practice nurses to improve healthcare for patients with ( high risk for ) CVD . Methods / design A two-arm cluster r and omized trial is planned . We offer practice nurses a tailored program to improve adherence to six specific recommendations related to blood pressure and cholesterol target values , risk profiling and lifestyle advice . Practice nurses are offered training and feedback on their motivational interviewing technique and an e-learning program on cardiovascular risk management ( CVRM ) . They are also advised to screen for the presence and severity of depressive symptoms in patients . We also advise practice nurses to use selected E-health options ( selected websites and Twitter-consult ) in patients without symptoms of depression . Patients with mild depressive symptoms are referred to a physical exercise group . We recommend referring patients with major depressive symptoms for assessment and treatment of depressive symptoms if appropriate before starting CVRM .  Data from 900 patients at high risk of CVD or with established CVD will be collected in 30 general practice s in several geographical areas in The Netherl and s. The primary outcome measure is performance of practice nurses in CVRM and reflects application of recommendations for personalized counselling and education of CVRM patients . Patients ’ health-related lifestyles ( physical exercise , diet and smoking status ) will be measured with vali date d question naires and medical record audit will be performed to document estimated CVD risk . Additionally , we will survey and interview participating healthcare professionals for exploration of processes of change . The control practice s will provide usual care . Discussion Tailored interventions can improve healthcare . An underst and ing of the methods to reach the improved healthcare can be improved . This research contributes a share of it . Identification of the determinants of practice and developing implementation interventions were two steps which were completed . The subsequent step was implementation of the tailored intervention program . Trial registration Name trial register : Nederl and s trial registerWeb address of trial register : http://www.trialregister.nl Data of registration : 11 July 2013Number of registration : Disseminating and implementing evidence -based , cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) prevention lifestyle interventions in community setting s and in ethnic minority population s is a challenge . We describe the design and methods for the South Asian Heart Lifestyle Intervention ( SAHELI ) study , a pilot study design ed to determine the feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally-targeted , community-based lifestyle intervention to improve physical activity and diet behaviors among medically underserved South Asians ( SAs ) . Participants with at least one CVD risk factor will be r and omized to either a lifestyle intervention or a control group .  Participants in both groups will be screened in a community setting and receive a primary care referral after r and omization . Intervention participants will receive 6weeks of group classes , followed by 12weeks of individual telephone support where they will be encouraged to initiate and maintain a healthy lifestyle goal . Control participants will receive their screening results and monthly mailings on CVD prevention . Primary outcomes will be changes in moderate/vigorous physical activity and saturated fat intake between baseline , 3- , and 6-month follow-up . Secondary outcomes will be changes in weight , clinical risk factors , primary care visits , self-efficacy , and social support . This study will be one of the first to pilot-test a lifestyle intervention for SAs , one of the fastest growing racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. and one with disparate CVD risk . Results of this pilot study will provide preliminary data about the efficacy of a lifestyle intervention on CVD risk in SAs and inform community-engaged CVD prevention efforts in an increasingly diverse U.S. population AIMS Cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes in South Asia . The CARRS Translation Trial tests the effectiveness , cost-effectiveness , and sustainability of a clinic-based multi-component CVD risk reduction intervention among people with diabetes in India and Pakistan . METHODS We r and omly assigned 1146 adults with diabetes recruited from 10 urban clinic sites , to receive usual care by physicians or to receive an integrated multi-component CVD risk reduction intervention . The intervention involves electronic health record management , decision-support prompts to the healthcare team , and the support of a care coordinator to actively facilitate patient and provider adherence to evidence -based guidelines . The primary outcome is a composite of multiple CVD risk factor control ( blood glucose and either blood pressure or cholesterol , or all three ) . Other outcomes include control of the individual CVD risk factors , process and patient-centered measures , cost-effectiveness , and acceptability/feasibility . CONCLUSION The CARRS Translation Trial tests a low-cost diabetes care delivery model in urban South Asia to achieve comprehensive cardio-metabolic disease case-management of high-risk patients ( clinical trials.gov number : NCT01212328 ) Background —Few data have evaluated physician adherence to cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) prevention guidelines according to physician specialty or patient characteristics , particularly gender . Methods and Results —An online study of 500 r and omly selected physicians ( 300 primary care physicians , 100 obstetricians/gynecologists , and 100 cardiologists ) used a st and ardized question naire to assess awareness of , adoption of , and barriers to national CVD prevention guidelines by specialty . An experimental case study design tested physician accuracy and determinants of CVD risk level assignment and application of guidelines among high- , intermediate- , or low-risk patients . Intermediate-risk women , as assessed by the Framingham risk score , were significantly more likely to be assigned to a lower-risk category by primary care physicians than men with identical risk profiles ( P<0.0001 ) , and trends were similar for obstetricians/gynecologists and cardiologists . Assignment of risk level significantly predicted recommendations for lifestyle  and preventive pharmacotherapy . After adjustment for risk assignment , the impact of patient gender on preventive care was not significant except for less aspirin ( P<0.01 ) and more weight management recommended ( P<0.04 ) for intermediate-risk women . Physicians did not rate themselves as very effective in their ability to help patients prevent CVD . Fewer than 1 in 5 physicians knew that more women than men die each year from CVD . Conclusions —Perception of risk was the primary factor associated with CVD preventive recommendations . Gender disparities in recommendations for preventive therapy were explained largely by the lower perceived risk despite similar calculated risk for women versus men . Educational interventions for physicians are needed to improve the quality of CVD preventive care and lower morbidity and mortality from CVD for men and women Objectives Investigate the association between socioeconomic deprivation and completeness of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk factor recording in primary care , uptake of screening in people with incomplete risk factor recording and with actual CVD risk within the screened subgroup . Design Cross-sectional study . Setting Nine UK general practice s. Participants 7987 people aged 50–74 years with no CVD diagnosis . Methods CVD risk was estimated using the Framingham equation from data extracted from primary care electronic health records . Where there was insufficient information to calculate risk , patients were invited to attend a screening assessment . Analysis Proportion of patients for whom clinical data were sufficiently complete to enable CVD risk to be calculated ; proportion of patients invited to screening who attended ; proportion of patients who attended screening whose 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event was high ( > 20 % ) . For each outcome , a set of logistic regression models were run . Crude and adjusted ORs were estimated for person-level deprivation , age , gender and smoking status . We included practice -level deprivation as a continuous variable and practice as a r and om effect to account for clustering . Results People who had lower  Indices of Multiple Deprivation ( IMD ) scores ( less deprived ) had significantly worse routine CVD risk factor recording ( adjusted OR 0.97 ( 0.95 to 1.00 ) per IMD decile ; p=0.042 ) . Screening attendance was poorer in those with more deprivation ( adjusted OR 0.89 ( 0.86 to 0.91 ) per IMD decile ; p<0.001 ) . Among those who attended screening , the most deprived were more likely to have CVD risk > 20 % ( OR 1.09 ( 1.03 to 1.15 ) per IMD decile ; p=0.004 ) . Conclusions Our data suggest that those who had the most to gain from screening were least likely to attend , potentially exacerbating existing health inequalities . Future research should focus on tailoring the delivery of CVD screening to ensure engagement of socioeconomically deprived groups Aims /hypothesisWithin a trial of intensive treatment of people with screen-detected diabetes , we aim ed to assess a potential spillover effect of the trial intervention on incident cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) and all-cause mortality among people who screened positive on a diabetes risk question naire but who were normoglycaemic . Methods In the Anglo – Danish – Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment In People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION)-Denmark trial , 175 general practice s were cluster-r and omised into : ( 1 ) screening plus routine care of individuals with screen-detected diabetes ( control group ) ;  or (  2 ) screening plus training and support in intensive multifactorial treatment of individuals with screen-detected diabetes ( intervention  group  ) . We identified all individuals who screened positive on a diabetes risk question naire in ADDITION-Denmark but were normoglycaemic following biochemical testing for use in this secondary analysis . After a median 8.9 years follow-up , we used data from national registers to compare rates of first CVD events and all-cause mortality in individuals in the routine care group with those in the intensive treatment group . Results In total , 21,513 individuals screened positive for high risk of diabetes but were normoglycaemic on biochemical testing in ADDITION-Denmark practice s between 2001 and 2006 ( 10,289 in the routine care group and 11,224 in the intensive treatment group ) . During 9 years of follow-up , there were 3784 first CVD events and 1748 deaths . The incidence of CVD was lower among the intensive treatment group compared with the routine care group ( HR 0.92 [ 95 % CI 0.85 , 0.99 ] ) . This association was stronger among individuals at highest CVD risk ( heart SCORE ≥ 10 ; HR 0.85 [ 95 % CI 0.75 , 0.96 ] ) . There was no difference in mortality between the two treatment groups ( HR 1.02 [ 95 % CI 0.92 , 1.14 ] ) . Conclusions /interpretationTraining of general practitioners to provide target-driven intensive management of blood glucose levels and other cardiovascular risk factors showed some evidence of a spillover effect on the risk of CVD over a 9 year period among individuals at high risk of diabetes . The effect was particularly pronounced among those at highest risk of CVD . There was no effect on mortality . Trial registration : Clinical Trials.gov OBJECTIVE The Diabetes Care Protocol ( DCP ) , a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention , reduces cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetic patients . We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of DCP from a Dutch health care perspective . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A cluster r and omized trial provided data of DCP versus usual care . The 1-year follow-up patient data were extrapolated using a modified Dutch microsimulation diabetes model , computing individual lifetime health-related costs , and health effects . Incremental costs and effectiveness ( quality -adjusted life-years [ QALYs ] ) were estimated using multivariate generalized estimating equations to correct for practice -level clustering and confounding . Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ( ICERs ) were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were created . Stroke costs were calculated separately . Subgroup analyses examined patients with and without cardiovascular disease ( CVD+ or CVD− patients , respectively ) . RESULTS Excluding stroke  , DCP patients lived longer ( 0.14 life-years , P = NS ) , experienced more QALYs ( 0.037 , P = NS ) , and incurred higher total costs ( € 1,415 , P = NS ) , result ing in an ICER of € 38,243 per QALY gained . The likelihood of cost-effectiveness given a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 20,000 per QALY gained is 30 % . DCP had a more favorable effect on CVD+ patients ( ICER = € 14,814 ) than for CVD− patients ( ICER = € 121,285 ) . Coronary heart disease costs were reduced ( € −587 , P < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS DCP  reduces cardiovascular risk , result ing in only a slight improvement in QALYs , lower CVD costs , but higher total costs , with a high cost-effectiveness ratio . Cost-effective care can be achieved by focusing on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients with a history of CVD Background The global burden of the major vascular diseases is projected to rise and to remain the dominant non-communicable disease cluster well into the twenty first century . The Department of Health in Engl and has developed the NHS Health Check service as a policy initiative to reduce population vascular disease risk . The aims of this study were to monitor population changes in cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk factors over the first year of the new service and to assess the value of tailored lifestyle support , including motivational interview with ongoing support and referral to other services . Methods R and omised trial comparing NHS Health Check service only with NHS Health Check service plus additional lifestyle support in Stoke on Trent , Engl and . Thirty eight general practice s and 601 ( 365 usual care , 236 additional lifestyle support ) patients were recruited and r and omised independently between September 2009 and February 2010 . Changes in population CVD risk between baseline and one year follow-up were compared , using intention-to-treat analysis . The primary outcome was the Framingham 10 year CVD risk score . Secondary outcomes included individual modifiable risk measures and prevalence of individual risk categories . Additional lifestyle support included referral to a lifestyle coach and free sessions as needed for : weight management , physical activity , cook and eat and positive thinking . Results Average population CVD risk decreased from 32.9 % to 29.4 % ( p < 0.001 ) in the NHS Health Check only group and from 31.9 % to 29.2 % ( p < 0.001 ) in the NHS Health Check plus additional lifestyle support group . There was no significant difference between the two groups at either measurement point . Prevalence of high blood pressure , high cholesterol and smoking were reduced significantly ( p < 0.01 ) in both groups . Prevalence of central obesity was reduced significantly ( p < 0.01 ) in the group receiving additional lifestyle support but not in the NHS Health Check only group . Conclusions The NHS Health Check service in Stoke on Trent result ed in significant reduction in estimated population CVD risk . There was no evidence of further benefit of the additional lifestyle support services in terms of absolute CVD risk reduction BACKGROUND Many dementia and cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) cases in older adults are attributable to modifiable vascular and lifestyle-related risk factors , providing opportunities for prevention . In the Healthy Aging Through Internet Counselling in the Elderly ( HATICE ) r and omized controlled trial , an internet-based multidomain intervention is being tested to improve the cardiovascular risk ( CVR ) profile of older adults . OBJECTIVE To design a multidomain intervention to improve CVR  , based on the guidelines for CVR management , and administered through a coach-supported , interactive , platform to over 2500 community-dwellers aged 65 + in three European countries . METHODS A comparative analysis of national and European guidelines for primary and secondary CVD prevention was performed . Results were used to define the content of the intervention . RESULTS The intervention design focused on promoting awareness and self-management of hypertension , dyslipidemia , diabetes mellitus , and overweight , and supporting smoking cessation , physical activity , and healthy diet . Overall , available guidelines lacked specific recommendations for CVR management in older adults . The comparative analysis of the guidelines showed general consistency for lifestyle-related recommendations . Key differences , identified mostly in methods used to assess the overall CVR , did not hamper the intervention design . Minor country-specific adaptations were implemented to maximize the intervention feasibility in each country . CONCLUSION Despite differences in CVR management within the countries considered , it was possible to design and implement the HATICE multidomain intervention . The study can help define preventative strategies for dementia and CVD that are applicable internationally Abstract BACKGROUND : Quality of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) preventive care is suboptimal . Recent data correlated increasing years in practice for physicians with lower- quality health care . OBJECTIVE : The purpose of this study was to assess physician awareness/adherence to national blood pressure , cholesterol , and CVD prevention guidelines for women according to physician/ practice characteristics . DESIGN : St and ardized online survey and experimental case studies were administered to 500 r and omly selected U.S. physicians . Multivariable regression models tested physician age , gender , specialty , and practice type as independent predictors of guideline awareness/adherence . RESULTS : Compared with older physicians ( 50 + years ) , younger physicians ( < 50 years ) reported a lower level of awareness of cholesterol guidelines ( P=.04 ) and lower incorporation of women ’s guidelines ( P=.02 ) . Yet , older physicians were less likely to recommend weight management for high-risk cases ( P=.03 ) and less confident in helping patients manage weight ( P=.045 ) than younger physicians . Older physicians were also less likely to identify a low-density lipoprotein < 100 mg/dL as optimal versus younger physicians ( P=.01 ) , as were solo versus nonsolo practitioners ( P=.02 ) . Solo practitioners were less aware of cholesterol guidelines ( P=.04 ) and were more likely to prescribe aspirin  for low-risk female patients than nonsolo practitioners ( P<.01 ) . Solo practitioners rated their clinical judgment as more effective than guidelines in improving patient health outcomes ( P<.01 ) and more frequently rated the patient as the greatest barrier to CVD prevention versus nonsolo practitioners ( P<.01 ) . CONCLUSIONS : Though guideline awareness is high , efforts to promote their utilization are needed and may improve quality outcomes . Targeted education and support for CVD prevention may be helpful to older and solo physicians Introduction : A large proportion of the cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) burden can potentially be prevented by primary prevention programs addressing major causal risk factors . A Web-based health risk assessment ( HRA ) with tailored feedback for individual health promotion is a promising strategy . We evaluated the effect on CVD risk of such a program among employees of a Dutch worksite . Methods : We conducted a prospect i ve follow-up study among 368 employees who voluntarily participated in a Web-based HRA program at a single Dutch worksite in 2008 . The program included a multicomponent HRA through a Web-based electronic question naire , biometrics , and laboratory evaluation . The results were combined with health behavior change theory to generate tailored motivational and educational health advice . On request , a health counseling session with the program physician was available . Follow-up data on CVD risk were collected 1 year after initial participation . The primary outcome was a change in Framingham CVD risk at 6 months relative to baseline . We checked for a possible background effect of an increased health consciousness as a consequence of program introduction at the worksite by comparing baseline measurements of early program participants with baseline measurements of participants who completed the program 6 months later . Results : A total of 176 employees completed follow-up measurements after a mean of 7 months . There was a grade d relation between CVD risk changes and baseline risk , with a relative reduction of 17.9 % ( P = 0.001 ) in the high-risk category ( baseline CVD risk ≥20 % ) . Changes were not explained by additional health counseling , medication , or an increase in health consciousness within the company . Conclusions : Voluntary participation in a Web-based HRA with tailored feedback at the worksite reduced CVD risk by nearly 18 % among participants at high CVD risk and by nearly 5 % among all participants . Web-based HRA could improve CVD risk in similar population s. Future research should focus on the persistence of the effects underlying the CVD risk reduction Introduction While a number of strategies are being implemented to control cardiovascular diseases ( CVDs ) and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) , the cost-effectiveness of these in the South Asian context has not been systematic ally evaluated . We aim to systematic ally review the economic ( cost-effectiveness ) evidence available on the individual- , group- and population -level interventions for control of CVD and T2DM in South Asia . Methods and analysis This review will consider all relevant economic evaluations , either conducted alongside r and omised controlled trials or based on decision modelling estimates . These studies must include participants at risk of developing CVD/T2DM or with established disease in one or more of the South Asian countries ( India , Bangladesh , Pakistan , Sri Lanka , Nepal , Maldives , Bhutan and Afghanistan ) . We will identify relevant papers by systematic ally search ing all major data bases and registries . Selected articles will be screened by two independent research ers . Method ological quality of the studies will be assessed using a modified Drummond and a Phillips checklist . Cochrane guidelines will be followed for bias assessment in the effectiveness studies . Results Results will be presented in line with the PRISMA ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta- analysis ) checklist , and overall quality of evidence will be presented as per the GRADE ( Grade s of Recommendation , Assessment , Development and Evaluation ) approach . Ethics and dissemination The study has received ethics approval from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi , India . The results of this review will provide policy-relevant recommendations for the uptake of cost-effectiveness evidence in prioritising decisions on essential chronic disease care packages for South Asia . Study registration number PROSPERO CRD42013006479 Objectives : The SCORE model predicts the ten-year risk of cardiovascular mortality but it is still unknown whether applying the SCORE in clinical practice subsequently improves cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) outcomes . The objective of this study is to assess the effect of total cardiovascular risk estimation using the SCORE in preventing serious cardiovascular events in European adults without prior CVD . Methods and results : Data sources : eight bibliographical data bases ( 2003 – August 2015 ) , other internet sources and reference lists of articles were checked . This was supplemented by contact with the board members of the European Society of Cardiology ( ESC ) and the authors of the SCORE model . Study eligibility criteria : all prospect i ve studies in any language investigating the effect of using the SCORE on the clinical outcome ( CVD death , major events and adverse outcomes ) in an adult population were examined . Two review ers assessed the studies independently ( titles , abstract s , full texts ) . After removal of duplicates , 5,256 records were screened and 14 full text papers considered . No eligible studies were identified . An extensive literature search revealed no r and omized control trial or other prospect i ve study comparing significant clinical outcomes between groups that used the SCORE and those who did not . Conclusions : The effect of using the SCORE ( with or without subsequent intervention ) on CVD death , all-cause mortality , major CVD events like myocardial infa rct ion and stroke , as well as adverse outcomes , is still unknown . A cluster r and omised controlled trial is warranted to evaluate the use of the SCORE on important outcomes BACKGROUND Despite the cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk associated with hypertension , diabetes , dyslipidemia , and smoking , these risk factors remain poorly identified and controlled . OBJECTIVES The study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a community pharmacy-based case finding and intervention on cardiovascular risk . METHODS The RxEACH ( Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project ) study was a r and omized trial conducted in 56 community pharmacies . Participants were recruited by their pharmacist , who enrolled adults at high risk for CVD . Patients were r and omized to usual care ( usual pharmacist care with no specific intervention ) or intervention , comprising a Medication Therapy Management review from their pharmacist and CVD risk assessment and education . Pharmacists prescribed medications and ordered laboratory tests as per their scope of practice to achieve treatment targets . Subjects received monthly follow-up visits for 3 months . The primary outcome was difference in change in estimated CVD risk between groups at 3 months . CVD risk was estimated using the greater of the Framingham , International , or United Kingdom Prospect i ve Diabetes Study risk scores . RESULTS We enrolled 723 patients ( mean 62 years of age ; 58 % male , and 27 % smokers ) . After adjusting for baseline values and center effect , there was a 21 % difference in change in risk for CVD events ( p < 0.001 ) between the intervention and usual care groups . The intervention group had greater improvements in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( -0.2 mmol/l ; p < 0.001 ) , systolic blood pressure ( -9.37 mm Hg ; p < 0.001 ) , glycosylated hemoglobin ( -0.92 % ; p < 0.001 ) , and smoking cessation ( 20.2 % ; p = 0.002 ) . CONCLUSIONS The RxEACH study was the first large r and omized trial of CVD risk reduction by community pharmacists , demonstrating a significant reduction in risk for CVD events . Engagement of community pharmacists with an exp and ed scope of practice could have significant public health implication s. ( The Alberta Vascular Risk Reduction Community Pharmacy Project : RxEACH [ RxEACH ] ; NCT01979471 ) BACKGROUND Many strategies have been evaluated to improve the prevention and control of cardiovascular ( CVD ) risk factors . Nursing telephonic and tele-counseling individualized lifestyle educational programs have been found to improve blood pressure control and adherence to lifestyle recommendation . This study tested the efficacy of a nurse-led reminder program through email ( NRP-e ) to improve CVD risk factors among hypertensive adults . METHODS All participants received usual CVD prevention and a guideline -based educational program . Subjects in the NRP-e group also received weekly email alerts and phone calls from a nurse care manager for 6 months . Emails contained a reminder program on the need for adherence with a healthy lifestyle based upon current guidelines . Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1 , 3 and 6 months after enrollment ; r and omization was made central ly and blood sample s were evaluated into a single laboratory . RESULTS The final sample consisted of 98 ( control ) and 100 ( NRP-e ) subjects ( mean age 59.0 ± 14.5 years ; 51.0 % males ) . After 6 months , the following CVD risk factors significantly improved in both groups : body mass index , alcohol and fruit consumption , cigarette smoking , adherence to therapy hours , systolic and diastolic blood pressure , fasting blood glucose , low-density lipoproteins ( LDL ) and total cholesterol , triglycerides , and physical activity . In the NRP-e group , however , the prevalence of several behaviors or conditions at risk decreased significantly more than in the control group : obesity ( -16 % ) , low fruit consumption ( -24 % ) , uncontrolled hypertension ( -61 % ) , LDL ( -56 % ) , and total cholesterol ( -40 % ) . CONCLUSIONS The NRP-e improved a range of CVD risk factors . The program had low costs , required only an average of < 20 min per day in addition to normal practice , and may deserve further evaluation for the inclusion among existing care management approaches Background In Europe , for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases ( CVD ) , the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation ( SCORE ) risk charts for high-risk and low-risk regions ( SCORE-high and SCORE-low , respectively ) are used . For the Dutch ‘ Clinical Practice Guideline for Cardiovascular Risk Management ’ an adapted SCORE risk chart ( SCORE-NL ) was developed in collaboration with the SCORE group . We evaluated these three SCORE equations using Dutch risk factor and mortality data . Design Prospect i ve cohort study with 10-year follow-up . Methods Baseline data were collected between 1987 and 1997 in 32 885 persons aged 37.5–62.5 years .  Vital status was checked and causes of death were obtained from Statistics Netherl and s. On the basis of the level of risk factors , the expected number of CVD deaths was calculated by applying the three SCORE equations and compared with the observed number . Results The observed CVD mortality was three-fold higher in men ( n = 242 ; 1.6 % ) than in women ( n = 83 ; 0.5 % ) . On the basis of SCORE-NL , 8.5 % of the men and 0.8 % of the women had a CVD mortality risk of 5 % or more . The ratio of the observed-to-expected number of CVD deaths was 0.75 for men and 0.55 for women using SCORE-NL , 0.54 and 0.56 using SCORE-high , and 1.11 and 0.95 using SCORE-low . Conclusion At the population level , SCORE-low predicts the number of CVD deaths well , whereas both SCORE-NL and SCORE-high overestimate the number of CVD deaths by a factor 1.5–2 Background Clinical practice focuses on the primary prevention of  cardiovascular ( CV ) disease ( CVD ) through the modification and pharmacological treatment of elevated risk factors . Prediction models based on established risk factors are available for use in the primary prevention setting . However , the prevention of risk factor development through healthy lifestyle behaviors , or primordial prevention , is of paramount importance to achieve optimal population ‐wide CV health and minimize long‐term CVD risk . Methods and Results We developed a  lifestyle‐based CVD prediction model among 61 025 women in the Nurses ’ Health Study and 34 478 men in the Health Professionals Follow‐up Study , who were free of chronic disease in 1986 and followed for ≤24 years .  Lifestyle factors  were assessed by question naires in 1986 . In the derivation step , we used the Bayes Information Criterion to create parsimonious 20‐year risk prediction models among a r and om two thirds of participants in each cohort separately . The scores were vali date d in the remaining one third of participants in each cohort . Over 24 years , there were 3775 cases of CVD in women and 3506 cases in men . The Healthy Heart Score included age , smoking , body mass index , exercise , alcohol , and a composite diet score . In the validation cohort , the risk score demonstrated good discrimination ( Harrell 's C‐index , 0.72 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.71 , 0.74 [ women ] ; 0.77 ; 95 % CI , 0.76 , 0.79 [ men ] ) , fit , and calibration , particularly among individuals without baseline hypertension or hypercholesterolemia . Conclusions The Healthy Heart Score accurately identifies individuals at elevated risk for CVD and may serve as an important clinical and public health screening tool for the primordial prevention of CVD Background Cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) is a major cause of death in China . Despite government efforts , the majority of hypertensive and diabetic patients in China do not receive proper treatment . Reducing CVD events requires long-term care that is proactive , patient-centred , community-based , and sustainable . We have design ed a package of interventions for patients at high risk of CVD to be implemented by family doctors based in township hospitals ( providers of primary care ) in rural Zhejiang , China . This trial aims to determine whether the systematic CVD risk reduction package results in reduced CVD events among patients at risk of CVD compared with usual care , and whether the package is cost-effective and suitable for routine implementation and scale-up . Methods / Design This is a prospect i ve , open-label , cluster r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) with blinded data analysis . The trial will r and omize 67 township hospitals with 31,708 participants in three counties in Zhejiang Province . Participants will be identified from existing health records and will comprise adults aged 50 to 74 years , with a calculated 10-year CVD risk of 20 % or higher , or diabetes . In the intervention arm , participants will receive a package of interventions including : 1 ) healthy lifestyle counseling ( smoking cessation , and salt , oil , and alcohol reduction ) ; 2 ) prescription of a combination of drugs ( antihypertensives , aspirin , and statin ) ; and 3 ) adherence support for drug compliance and healthy lifestyle change . In the control arm , participants will receive usual care for hypertension and diabetes management at individual clinicians ’ discretion . The primary outcome is the incidence of severe CVD events over 24 months of follow-up . All CVD events will be defined according to the World Health Organization ( WHO ) monitoring of trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease ( MONICA ) definitions , diagnosed at the county hospital or higher level , and reported by the Zhejiang surveillance system . Secondary outcomes include : mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure , blood glucose , serum total cholesterol ( TC ) , and adherence to appointments , and drugs and lifestyle changes . Discussion This trial focuses on risk reduction of CVD rather than specific diseases . It is not design ed to compare therapeutic and healthy lifestyle interventions , but rather their combined effects in primary care setting s. Through the trial , we intend to underst and the effectiveness of the comprehensive CVD reduction package in routine practice . We also intend to underst and the barriers and facilitators to implementing the package , and thus to advise on policy and practice change . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials : IS RCT
Results were inconsistent for changes in CVD risk factors such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure , total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol , and hemoglobin A1C levels .
CONCLUSIONS CDSSs are effective in improving clinician practice s related to screening and other preventive care services , clinical tests , and treatments .
CONTEXT Clinical decision support systems ( CDSSs ) can help clinicians assess cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) risk and manage CVD risk factors by providing tailored assessment s and treatment recommendations based on individual patient data .
The goal of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of CDSSs in improving screening for CVD risk factors , practice s for CVD-related preventive care services such as clinical tests and prescribed treatments , and management of CVD risk factors .