Segmental pulmonary vein antrum isolation using the "large-size" lasso catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pulmonary venous isolation by antral ablation with a large cryoballoon for treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: medium-term outcomes and non-randomised comparison with pulmonary venous isolation by radiofrequency ablation Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon technique results from a prospective 3-center study. Efficacy and safety of segmental ostial versus circumferential extra-ostial pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Phased-Array Intracardiac Echocardiography Monitoring During Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Outcome and Complications EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Corticosteroid use during pulmonary vein isolation is associated with a higher prevalence of dormant pulmonary vein conduction. Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation (STAR AF): a randomized, multicentre, international trial† Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency for pulmonary vein re-isolation after a failed initial ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. One-year follow-up after irrigated multi-electrode radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study. Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison. Mesh ablator vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the MACPAF study. MEDAFI-Trial (Micro-embolization during ablation of atrial fibrillation): comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon technique vs. radiofrequency energy. Electrogram-guided substrate ablation with or without pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Adenosine following pulmonary vein isolation to target dormant conduction elimination (ADVICE): methods and rationale. Ganglionated plexus ablation vs linear ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison. Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation With Additional Linear Ablation Results in an Increased Incidence of Left Atrial Flutter Compared With Segmental Pulmonary Vein Isolation as an Initial Approach to Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Randomized Ablation Strategies for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: RASTA Study The difference in autonomic denervation and its effect on atrial fibrillation recurrence between the standard segmental and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation techniques. Long-term comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matched analysis. Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Defragmentation: The CHASE-AF Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND The limited efficacy and complications of segmental ostial pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) for treating atrial fibrillation ( AF ) have been discussed so , in the present study the feasibility and efficiency of performing segmental pulmonary vein ( PV ) antrum isolation to treat AF were assessed . METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 187 patients with drug-refractory AF ( paroxysmal 120 , persistent 67 ) underwent segmental PVI guided by circumferential 20-electrode catheters ( Lasso ) . Radiofrequency ( RF ) current was delivered either at the ostium using a regular Lasso ( 15 - 20 mm in diameter , 70 patients : Group 1 ) or at the antrum using a larger Lasso ( 25 - 30 mm in diameter , 117 patients : Group 2 ) . A significantly wider region had to be ablated , with a longer RF application time , to isolate all 4 PVs in Group 2 patients than in Group 1 patients . Although the rate of recurrence of AF after the initial session was equal in both groups , a significantly greater number of patients were free from AF after a mean of 1.4 procedures in Group 2 than in Group 1 ( 93 % vs 76 % for paroxysmal AF , 78 % vs 48 % for persistent AF ) . CONCLUSIONS Segmental antral PVI using large-sized Lasso catheters was found to be more effective and safer than ostial PVI for the treatment of AF Background To prevent  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) recurrence after catheter ablation , pulmonary venous isolation ( PVI ) at an antral level is more effective than segmental ostial ablation . Cryoablation around the pulmonary venous ( PV ) ostia for AF therapy is potentially safer compared to radiofrequency ablation ( RFA ) . The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a strategy using a large cryoablation balloon to perform antral cryoablation with ‘ touch-up ’ ostial cryoablation for PVI in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF . Methods Paroxysmal and persistent AF patients undergoing their first left atrial ablation were recruited . After cryoballoon therapy , each PV was assessed for isolation and if necessary , treated with focal ostial cryoablation until PVI was achieved . Follow-up with Holter monitoring was performed . Clinical outcomes of the cryoablation protocol were compared , with consecutive patients undergoing PVI by RFA . Results 124 consecutive patients underwent cryoablation . 77 % of paroxysmal and 48 % of persistent AF subjects were free from AF at 12 months after a single procedure . Over the same time period , 53 consecutive paroxysmal AF subjects underwent PVI with RFA and at 12 months , 72 % were free from AF at 12 months ( p = NS ) . There were too few persistent AF subjects ( n=8 ) undergoing solely PVI by RFA as a comparison group . Procedural and fluoroscopic times during cryoablation were significantly shorter than RFA . Conclusions PV isolation can be achieved in less than 2 h by a simple cryoablation protocol with excellent results after a single intervention , particularly for paroxysmal AF OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy safety of the novel cryoballoon device ( A rct ic Front , Cryocath , Quebec , Canada ) . BACKGROUND Antral pulmonary vein ( PV ) ablation with radiofrequency energy is widely used as a strategy for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) . A novel double lumen cryoballoon catheter was design ed for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) with the cryoablation technique . METHODS We consecutively enrolled 346 patients with symptomatic , drug refractory paroxysmal ( n = 293 ) or persistent ( n = 53 ) atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . In all patients , PVI of all targeted PVs was the therapeutic aim . The primary end points of this nonr and omized study were : 1 ) acute isolation rate of targeted PV ; and 2 ) first electrocardiogram-documented recurrence of AF . The secondary end point was occurrence of PV stenosis or atrio-esophageal fistula . RESULTS The 1,360 of 1,403 PVs ( 97 % ) were targeted with balloons or balloons in combination with the use of Freezor Max ( Cryocath ) . We found that ablation with the cryoballoon result ed in maintenance of sinus rhythm in 74 % of patients with PAF and 42 % of patients with persistent AF . No PV narrowing occurred . The most frequent complication was right phrenic nerve palsy observed during cryoballoon ablation at the right superior PV . CONCLUSIONS Pulmonary vein isolation with a new cryoballoon technique is feasible . Sinus rhythm can be maintained in the majority of patients with PAF by circumferential PVI using a cryoballoon ablation system . Cryoablation was less effective in patients with persistent AF than in patients with PAF INTRODUCTION Pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) can be performed using a segmental ostial or a circumferential extra-ostial approach . The relative merits and potential limitations of each approach are currently debated . Here we report our early experience with each of these approaches , including their relative efficacy and safety . METHODS AND RESULTS Forty patients with drug-refractory AF underwent segmental ostial PV isolation and were compared to 40 consecutive patients who underwent PV isolation using a circumferential extra-ostial approach . The latter approach described here is novel in two aspects : ( 1 ) the endpoint for ablation was PV isolation and not only delay in left atrial to PV conduction time , and ( 2 ) isolation of the right and left PVs was achieved by a single encirclement of ipsilateral veins . At follow-up , 60 % of the patients in the segmental group were free of AF compared to 75 % of the patients in the circumferential group . There was one thromboembolic cerebrovascular complication during the ablation procedure in each group . CONCLUSION PV isolation using a circumferential extra-ostial approach , where the ipsilateral PVs are isolated together by one encircling line of block using electroanatomic mapping , is a technically feasible procedure . This approach is at least as effective and safe as the more established segmental ostial approach for AF ablation Background —The objective of this study was to assess the impact of intracardiac echocardiography ( ICE ) on the long-term success and complications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) for treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Methods and Results —Three hundred fifteen patients underwent PVI for treatment of AF . Each patient underwent ostial isolation of all PVs using a cooled-tip ablation catheter . PVI was performed using circular mapping ( CM ) alone ( group 1 , 56 patients ) , CM and ICE ( group 2 , 107 patients ) , and CM and ICE with titration of radiofrequency energy based on visualization of microbubbles by ICE ( group 3 , 152 patients ) . After a mean follow-up time of 417±145 days , 19.6 % ( 11 of 56 ) , 16.8 % ( 18 of 107 ) , and 9.8 % ( 15 of 152 ) of patients in groups 1 , 2 , and 3 experienced recurrence of AF , respectively . Moreover , whereas no group 3 patient experienced severe ( > 70 % ) PV stenosis , severe PV stenosis was documented in 3 ( 3.5 % ) of 56 patients in group 1 and in 2 ( 1.8 % ) of 107 patients in group 2 ( P < 0.05 ) . No embolic events were detected in group 3 patients . Conclusions —Intracardiac echocardiography improves the outcome of cooled-tip PVI . Power adjustment guided by direct visualization of microbubble formation reduces the risk of PV stenosis and improves long-term cure Aims A challenge of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) is electrical reconnection of the PV . EFFICAS I showed correlation between contact force ( CF ) parameters and PV durable isolation but no prospect i ve evaluation was made . EFFICAS II was a multicentre study to prospect ively assess the impact of CF guidance for an effective reduction of PVI gaps . Methods and results Pulmonary vein isolation using a radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation catheter with an integrated force sensor ( TactiCath ™ ) was performed in patients with PAF . Operators were provided EFFICAS I-based CF guidelines [ target 20 g , range 10–30 g , minimum 400 g s force-time integral ( FTI ) ] . Conduction gaps were assessed by remapping of PVs after 3 months , and gap rate was compared with EFFICAS I outcome . At follow up , 24 patients had 85 % of PVs remaining isolated , compared with 72 % in EFFICAS I ( P = 0.037 ) in which CF guidelines were not used . The remaining 15 % of gaps correlated to the number of catheter moves at creating the PVI line , quantified as Continuity Index . For PV lines with contiguous lesions and low catheter moves , durable isolation was 81 % in EFFICAS I and 98 % in EFFICAS II ( P = 0.005 ) . At index procedure , the number of lesions was reduced by 15 % in EFFICAS II vs. EFFICAS I. Conclusion The use of CF with the above guidelines and contiguous deployment of RF lesions in EFFICAS II study result ed in more durable PVI in catheter ablation of PAF BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to prospect ively determine if the use of intraprocedural corticosteroids to limit the extent of tissue edema and /or inflammation alters the prevalence of spontaneous and adenosine-induced acute PV reconnection after PVI . METHODS Prior to wide circumferential PVI , 45 patients received a single intravenous ( IV ) bolus of hydrocortisone 250 mg immediately after transseptal access ( steroid group ) . Another 45 consecutive patients underwent st and ard PVI without IV hydrocortisone  ( nonsteroid group ) . After PVI , all patients underwent adenosine testing to unmask dormant conduction . Patients were followed at 3 , 6 , and 12 months . RESULTS Dormant conduction was unmasked in a significantly higher proportion of PVs in the steroid group compared with the nonsteroid group ( 32.8 % of PVs [ 60/183 ] vs 21.1 % of PVs [ 37/175 ] , P = .03 ) . On multivariate generalized estimating equation analysis , steroid use remained independently associated with dormant PV conduction ( P = .03 ) . There was no difference in the segmental distribution of reconnection between the 2 groups . The 1-year freedom from recurrent AF did not differ between groups ( P = .37 ) . Radiofrequency time was significantly longer in the steroid group ( 58 ± 21 minutes vs 48 ± 18 minutes , P < .01 ) , whereas procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were comparable ( P = .55 and P = .44 , respectively ) . CONCLUSION A single bolus of hydrocortisone 250 mg IV prior to PVI results in greater radiofrequency requirements for PVI and a higher prevalence of dormant PV conduction unmasked by adenosine . The utility of these approaches requires evaluation in a long-term prospect i ve r and omized study Aims This multicentre , r and omized trial compared three strategies of AF ablation : ablation of complex fractionated electrograms ( CFE ) alone , pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone , and combined PVI + CFE ablation , using st and ardized automated mapping software . Methods and results Patients with drug-refractory , high-burden paroxysmal ( episodes > 6 h , > 4 in 6 months ) or persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) were enrolled at eight centres . Patients ( n = 100 ) were r and omized to one of three arms . For CFE alone ( n = 34 ) , spontaneous/induced AF was mapped using vali date d , automated CFE software and all sites < 120 ms were ablated until AF termination/non-inducibility . For PVI ( n = 32 ) , all four PV antra were isolated and confirmed using a circular catheter . For PVI + CFE ( n = 34 ) , all four PV antra were isolated , followed by AF induction and ablation of all CFE sites until AF termination/non-inducibility . Patients were followed at 3 , 6 , and 12 months with a visit , ECG , 48 h Holter . Atrial fibrillation symptoms were confirmed by loop recording . Repeat procedures were allowed within the first 6 months . The primary endpoint was freedom from AF > 30 s at 1 year . Patients ( age 57 ± 10 years , LA size 42 ± 6 mm ) were 35 % persistent AF . In CFE , ablation terminated AF in 68 % . Only 0.4 PVs per patient were isolated as a result of CFE . In PVI , 94 % had all four PVs successfully isolated . In PVI + CFE , 94 % had all four PVs isolated , 76 % had inducible AF with additional CFE ablation , with 73 % termination of AF . There were significantly more repeat procedures in the CFE arm ( 47 % ) vs. PVI ( 31 % ) or PVI + CFE ( 15 % ) ( P = 0.01 ) . After one procedure , PVI + CFE had a significantly higher freedom from AF ( 74 % ) compared with PVI ( 48 % ) and CFE ( 29 % ) ( P = 0.004 ) . After two procedures , PVI + CFE still had the highest success ( 88 % ) compared with PVI ( 68 % ) and CFE ( 38 % ) ( P = 0.001 ) . Ninety-six percent of these patients were off anti-arrhythmics . Complications were two tamponades , no PV stenosis , and no mortality . Conclusion In high-burden paroxysmal/persistent AF , PVI + CFE has the highest freedom from AF vs. PVI or CFE alone after one or two procedures . Complex fractionated electrogram alone has the lowest one and two procedure success rates with a higher incidence of repeat procedures . Clinical Trials.gov identifier number NCT00367757 AIM Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence , necessitating repeat ablation procedures . The aim of this prospect i ve r and omized patient-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ( Cryo ) versus radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure . METHODS Patients with a history of symptomatic PAF after a previous failed first RF ablation procedure were eligible for this study . Patients were r and omized to Cryo or RF redo ablation . The primary endpoint of the study was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia , including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia , after a second ablation procedure at 1 year of follow-up . All patients were implanted with a cardiac monitor ( Reveal XT , Medtronic ) to continuously track the cardiac rhythm . Patients with an AF burden ( AF% ) ≤ 0.5 % were considered AF-free ( Responders ) , while those with an AF% > 0.5 % were classified as patients with AF recurrences ( non-Responders ) . RESULTS Eighty patients with AF recurrences after a first RF pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) were r and omized to Cryo ( N = 40 ) or to RF ( N = 40 ) . Electrical potentials were recorded in 77 mapped PVs ( 1.9 ± 0.8 per patient ) in Cryo Group and 72 PVs ( 1.7 ± 0.8 per patient ) in RF Group ( P = 0.62 ) , all of which were targeted . In Cryo group , 68 ( 88 % ) of the 77 PVs were re-isolated using only Cryo technique ; the remaining 9 PVs were re-isolated using RF . In RF group , all 72 PVs were successfully re-isolated ( P = 0.003 vs Cryo ) . By intention-to-treat , 23 ( 58 % ) RF patients were AF-free vs 17 ( 43 % ) Cryo patients on no antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year ( P = 0.06 ) . Three patients had temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in the Cryo group ; the RF group had no complications . Of the 29 patients who had only Cryo PVI without any RF ablation , 11 ( 38 % ) were AF-free vs 20 ( 59 % ) of the 34 patients who had RF only ( P = 0.021 ) . CONCLUSION When patients require a redo pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure for recurrent PAF , RF appears to be the preferred energy source relative to Cryo AIMS Irrigated multi-electrode ablation ( IMEA ) is a novel tool to perform pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . The aim was to compare IMEA with point-by-point radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) undergoing PVI . METHODS AND RESULTS Forty-nine patients ( age 60 ± 9 years , 82 % male ) were studied . In 24 patients , the IMEA catheter was used in conjunction with an electroanatomic mapping system . Twenty-five patients undergoing RF point-by-point ablation ( RF-PVI ) served as a control group . Validation of PVI based on the IMEA catheter was performed using a st and ard circular mapping catheter . Ninety-two of 94 pulmonary veins ( PVs ) ( 98 % ) were isolated using IMEA alone . Procedure time was 125 ± 23 min in the IMEA group and 127 ± 31 min in the RF-PVI group ( P = 0.79 ) . Fluoroscopy time was 12.2 ( 11 - 16.1 ) min with IMEA compared with 5.2 ( 4.1 - 9.3 ) min in the RF-PVI group ( P < 0.001 ) . Net ablation time was 11.8 ( 10.2 - 15.4 ) min in the IMEA group compared with 33.6 ( 30.3 - 40.1 ) min in the RF-PVI group ( P < 0.001 ) . Of 94 PVs presumed to be isolated after IMEA ablation , validation using a st and ard circular mapping catheter showed persistent PV potentials in 33 PVs ( 35 % ) , requiring additional IMEA ablation . At 12 months , 16 of 24 patients ( 67 % ) in the IMEA group compared with 17 of 25 patients ( 68 % ) in RF-PVI group were free from AF ( P > 0.99 ) . CONCLUSION With similar total procedure duration , IMEA-PVI was associated with shorter net ablation time and longer fluoroscopy time . Irrigated multi-electrode ablation recordings were not sufficient to confirm isolation in 35 % of PVs . Single-procedure efficacy after 12 months was similar between the two groups Purpose Arrhythmia recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) occurs predominantly due to the reconnection of previously isolated pulmonary veins ( PVs ) . The prognostic implication s of detection and treatment of acute PV reconnection are not well understood . We aim to examine the prognostic significance of acute PV reconnection on arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year following PVI . Methods This prospect i ve study included 44 patients ( 22 men , 60 ± 7 years ) who underwent index PVI procedure for treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .  Acute PV reconnection  and /or dormant PV conduction were assessed sequentially in response to a 30-min waiting period , intravenous isoproterenol infusion and /or adenosine . All cases of acute PV reconnection and /or dormant conduction were successfully targeted with additional ablation . Results Freedom from AF at 1 year was 75 % ( 83.3 % in paroxysmal and 65 % in persistent AF , p = ns ) . Acute PV reconnection and /or dormant conduction were evident in 16 of 44 patients ( 36.3 % ) . AF recurrence was documented in eight of 16 patients with , but only in three of 28 patients without acute reconnection ( p = 0.009 ) . Three patients underwent a redo procedure , all from the group of patients with acute PV reconnection . In a multivariate model , acute PV reconnection was a strong independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence ( hazards ratio [ HR ] , 6.36 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 1.12–31.6 ) . Conclusion Identification of acute PV reconnection , even when successfully targeted , is a strong predictor of arrhythmia recurrence following PVI BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction . Effective lesion creation necessitates adequate contact force between the ablation catheter and myocardium . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to study the utility of contact force-guided ablation on immediate and long-term outcomes . METHODS Seventy-five patients with highly symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent wide circumferential PVI using an irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter . In 25 patients , ablation was guided by real-time contact force measurements ( CF group ; SmartTouch , Biosense Webster ) . A control group of 50 patients underwent  PVI using a st and ard nonforce sensing catheter ( st and ard group ; ThermoCool , Biosense Webster ) . After PVI , all patients underwent adenosine testing to unmask dormant conduction . Patients were followed up at 3 , 6 , and 12 months and by transtelephonic monitoring as well . RESULTS Dormant conduction was unmasked and subsequently eliminated in 4 PV pairs ( 8 % ; 16 % of patients ) in the CF group and 35 PV pairs ( 35 % ; 52 % of patients ) in the st and ard group ( P = .0004 per PV pair ; P = .0029 per patient ) . The single-procedure , off-antiarrhythmic drug freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias at 1 year was 88 % in the CF group vs 66 % in the st and ard group ( P = .047 ) . Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the CF group ( P = .0038 and P = .0001 , respectively ) . CONCLUSION The use of real-time contact force guidance results in a significant reduction in the prevalence of dormant conduction with improved long-term freedom from recurrent arrhythmias . The utility of a contact force-guided approach requires evaluation in a long-term prospect i ve r and omized study AIMS To investigate the effectiveness of additional substrate modification ( SM ) by left atrial ( LA ) linear lesions as compared with pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in a prospect i ve r and omized study . Percutaneous PVI has evolved as an accepted treatment for paroxysmal AF but seemed to be less effective in patients with persistent AF . The benefit of PVI alone and additional linear lesions has not been vali date d in a r and omized study so far . METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-two patients with persistent AF ( median duration 7 , range 1 - 18 months ) were r and omly assigned to either PVI alone ( n = 30 ) or additional SM ( n = 32 ) consisting of a roof line connecting both left superior and right superior PV and LA isthmus ablation between left inferior PV and mitral annulus . Procedures including SM were performed using a three-dimensional mapping system ( EnSite NavX , St Jude Medical , St Paul , MN , USA ) . Anti-arrhythmic drugs were discontinued within 8 weeks after ablation in both groups . Follow-up included daily trans-telephonic ECG transmitted irrespective of the patient 's symptoms . PVI was successful in 98 % of all targeted veins in both groups . Additional SM did not increase fluoroscopy time ( 72.1+/-18.7 vs. 72.9+/-17.3 min , P=0.92 ) because of the use of three-dimensional navigation in the PVI+SM group . AF recurrences within the first 4 weeks following ablation were more common after PVI alone ( 77 % ) than additional SM ( 44 % , P=0.002 ) . After a follow-up time of 487 ( 429 - 570 ) days , only 20 % of patients undergoing st and alone PVI  remained in sinus rhythm when compared with 69 % following PVI combined with SM ( P=0.0001 ) . Two patients assigned to PVI+SM experienced procedure-related complications ( cardiac tamponade and minor stroke ) which resolved without sequelae . CONCLUSION PVI alone is insufficient in the treatment of persistent AF . However , additional left linear lesions increase the success rate significantly . Early AF-relapses are associated with a negative outcome after PVI alone but not following additional SM AIMS Catheter ablation of the pulmonary veins ( PVs ) is a promising therapeutic approach for symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The prospect i ve r and omized single-centre study ' Mesh Ablator versus Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Ablation of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ' ( MACPAF ; clinical trials.gov NCT01061931 ) compared the efficacy and safety of two balloon-based PV ablation systems . METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-two patients underwent PV ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal AF using the A rct ic Front ® or the HD Mesh Ablator ® catheter  according to study protocol . The primary endpoint was complete PV isolation ( PVI ) at the end of the ablation procedure , determined by exit block after achieving entrance block . Long-term follow-up data are not included in this publication . Patients ' mean age was 61.7 ± 8.9 years , 43.2 % were female , and median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 2.0 . In the intention-to-treat analysis , the rate of the primary endpoint was 56.5 % in patients r and omized to the A rct ic Front ® and 9.5 % in patients r and omized to the HD Mesh Ablator ® catheter ( P = 0.001 ) . In the per- protocol analysis , complete PVI was achieved in 13 ( 76.5 % ) of 17 A rct ic Front ® patients but in none of the 15 HD Mesh Ablator ® patients ( P < 0.0001 ) . There were one major and two minor complications in each study arm but no clinical ly evident stroke . Post-procedural AF recurrence was detected within hospital stay in two ( 11.8 % ) A rct ic Front ® patients and in seven ( 46.7 % ) HD Mesh Ablator ® patients ( P = 0.049 ) . CONCLUSION The MACPAF study revealed a superiority of the A rct ic Front ® catheter concerning complete PVI . Owing to the insufficient efficacy of the HD Mesh Ablator ® catheter , the safety board decided to stop MACPAF prematurely AIMS Cerebral embolism is a possible serious complication during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .  The purpose of this prospect i ve pilot study was to analyse the incidence and possible impact of cryo ablation on cerebral lesions and possible differences to radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation during pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . METHODS AND RESULTS Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 89 patients , either with the cryoballoon technique ( n = 45 ) or with RF ablation ( n = 44 ) .  Phenprocoumon was stopped 3 days before intervention and replaced by subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin . During the catheter procedure , an infusion of unfractionated heparin was maintained to achieve an activated clotting time ( ACT ) of > 300 s. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed 1 day before and after PVI , and at 3-month follow-up . Chronic lesions were observed in 11 patients ( 12.3 % ) before PVI without statistically significant difference between the two groups . None of the patients had neurological symptoms during or following the procedure . Seven patients ( 7.9 % ) developed acute lesions 1 day after PVI , without statistically significant difference between the group treated by cryoenergy ( 8.9 % ) and RF ablation ( 6.8 % ) . Patients with acute lesions were significantly older compared with those without acute cerebral lesions . No additional cerebral lesions during follow-up were observed . CONCLUSION A considerable portion of patients with AF but without any neurological symptoms had chronic cerebral lesions before PVI . Additional acute lesions could be added after the procedure . Both ablation techniques showed additional cerebral acute lesions with no neurological symptoms after PVI AIMS Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAEs ) is a new approach for the treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of CFAE ablation as a st and -alone strategy in patients with persistent AF and to compare it with a combined approach of CFAE ablation and pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . METHODS AND RESULTS The study included 77 consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation of CFAE as a sole ablation procedure ( CFAE group , n = 23 patients ) or a combined approach of CFAE ablation and PVI ( CFAE plus PVI group , n = 54 patients ) . Procedures were guided by three-dimensional mapping systems . After the procedure , AF recurrences were evaluated with 7-day Holter recordings at 1 , 3 , and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter . Treatment failure was defined as > or=1 AF episode lasting > 30 s on Holter recordings during follow-up . After a mean follow-up time of 13 + /- 10 months , 2 of 23 patients ( 9 % ) with CFAE ablation and 22 of 54 patients ( 41 % ) with CFAE plus PVI were in sinus rhythm after a single ablation procedure without anti-arrhythmic medication ( P = 0.008 ) . CONCLUSION Ablation of CFAE as a st and -alone ablation strategy seems insufficient for the treatment of patients with persistent AF . Pulmonary vein isolation plus CFAE ablation significantly increases the mid-term success rate BACKGROUND Pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation ( PVI ) has emerged as an effective therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . However , AF recurs in up to 50 % of patients , generally because of recovery of PV conduction . Adenosine given during the initial procedure may reveal dormant PV conduction , thereby identifying the need for additional ablation , leading to improved outcomes . The Adenosine Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Target Dormant Conduction Elimination ( ADVICE ) study is a prospect i ve multicentre r and omized trial assessing the impact of adenosine-guided PVI in preventing AF recurrences . METHODS Patients undergoing a first PVI procedure for paroxysmal AF will be recruited . After st and ard PVI is completed , all patients will receive intravenous adenosine in an attempt to unmask dormant conduction . If dormant conduction is elicited , patients will be r and omized to no further ablation ( control group ) or additional adenosine-guided ablation until dormant conduction is abolished . If no dormant conduction is revealed , r and omly selected patients will be followed in a registry . The primary outcome is time to first documented symptomatic AF recurrence . Assuming that dormant conduction is present in 50 % of patients post PVI and symptomatic AF recurs in 45 % of controls , 244 patients with dormant conduction will be required to obtain > 90 % power to detect a difference of 20 % . Thus , a total of 488 patients will be enrolled and followed for 12 months . CONCLUSION The ADVICE trial will assess whether a PVI strategy incorporating elimination of dormant conduction unmasked by intravenous adenosine will decrease the rate of recurrent symptomatic AF compared with st and ard PVI BACKGROUND The optimal ablation technique for persistent and long-st and ing persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is unclear . Both linear lesion ( LL ) and ganglionated plexus ( GP ) ablation have been used in addition to pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) , but no direct comparison of the 2 methods exists . OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of 2 different ablation strategies-PVI+LL vs PVI+GP ablation -in patients with persistent or long-st and ing persistent AF . METHODS Two hundred sixty-four consecutive patients with persistent/long-st and ing persistent AF were r and omly assigned to 2 different ablation schemes : PVI+LL ( n = 132 ) and PVI+GP ( n = 132 ) ablation . Consistent sinus rhythm ( SR ) off antiarrhythmic drug was assessed after follow-up of at least 3 years with the use of an implanted monitoring device . RESULTS All procedural end points were acutely achieved . At 12 months after a single procedure , 47 % of the patients treated with PVI+LL were in SR compared to 54 % of the patients treated with PVI+GP ( P = .29 ) . At 3 years , 34 % of the patients with PVI+LL and 49 % of the patients with PVI+GP maintained SR ( P = .035 ) . Atrial flutter was more frequent in the PVI+LL group than in PVI+GP group ( 18 % vs 6 % ; P = .002 ) . After a second procedure in 78 patients of the PVI+LL group and 55 patients of the PVI+GP group , the long-term overall success rate was 52 % and 68 % , respectively ( P = .006 ) . CONCLUSIONS PVI+GP ablation confers superior clinical results with less ablation-related left atrial flutter and reduced AF recurrence compared to PVI+LL ablation at 3 years of follow-up Background —There has been growing concern that linear ablation is associated with an increased risk of iatrogenic arrhythmias in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Therefore , we compared circumferential pulmonary vein ablation plus left atrial linear ablation ( CPVA+LALA ) with segmental pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)in  patients with paroxysmal AF . Methods and Results —Sixty-six consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were prospect ively r and omly assigned to receive PVI versus CPVA+LALA ( consisting of encircling lesions around the pulmonary veins ) , a roof line , and a mitral isthmus line with documentation of bidirectional mitral isthmus block . All patients were seen at 1 , 3 , 6 , and every 12 months after ablation , with 14-day continuous ECG monitoring every 6 months . At 16.4±6.3 months after 1 ablation procedure , 19 patients ( 58 % ) remained free of atrial arrhythmias after PVI versus 17 patients ( 51 % ) after CPVA+LALA ( P=0.62 ) . After PVI , 14 patients had recurrent paroxysmal AF , whereas after CPVA+LALA , 8 patients had recurrent AF , 6 had atypical left atrial flutter ( LAFL ) , and 2 had both AF and LAFL ( P=0.32 between PVI versus CPVA+LALA for AF but P=0.002 for LAFL ) . Twenty-eight patients ( 85 % ) remained arrhythmia-free after 1.3±0.5 PVI procedures versus 28 patients ( 85 % ) after 1.4±0.6 CPVA+LALA procedures ( P = NS ) . Fluoroscopy time was longer after CPVA+LALA versus PVI ( 91 versus 73 minutes , P=0.04 ) . Conclusions —As an initial ablation approach in patients with paroxysmal AF  , more LAFL occurred after CPVA+LALA and fluoroscopy times were longer compared with segmental PVI Background — The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients . We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF . Methods and Results — Subjects were r and omized as follows : arm 1 , PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol ( st and ard approach ) ; arm 2 , st and ard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites ( mitral annulus , fossa ovalis , eustachian ridge , crista terminalis , and superior vena cava ) ; or arm 3 , st and ard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites . Patients were seen at 6 weeks , 6 months , and 1 year ; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit . Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months . The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure . A total of 156 patients ( aged 59±9 years ; 136 males ; AF duration , 47±50 months ) participated ( arm 1 , 55 patients ; arm 2 , 50 patients ; arm 3 , 51 patients ) . Procedural outcomes ( procedure , fluoroscopy , and PVI times ) were comparable between the 3 arms . More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram ( 33±9 versus 22±9 ; P<0.001 ) . The primary end point was achieved in 71 patients and was worse in arm 3 ( 29 % ) compared with arm 1 ( 49 % ; P=0.04 ) and arm 2 ( 58 % ; P=0.004 ) . Conclusions — These data suggest that additional substrate modification beyond PVI does not improve single-procedure efficacy in patients with persistent AF . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00379301 AIMS This study examined the difference in autonomic modification ( AM ) and its effect on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) recurrence between segmental pulmonary vein isolation ( S-PVI ) and circumferential PVI ( C-PVI ) . METHODS AND RESULTS Successful S-PVI or C-PVI with a basket catheter was achieved in 120 consecutive PAF patients . Serial 24 Holter-recordings were obtained before , immediately , and 1 , 3 , 6 , 12 months after the PVI to analyse the heart rate variability ( HRV ) .  Nineteen patients were excluded from analysis because of additional ablation for recurrent PAF after successful PVI . Among the residual 101 patients , 33 had PAF recurrences ( S-PVI = 44.0 % , C-PVI = 21.6 % ) at 1 year of follow-up . The root mean square of successive differences and high-frequency power reflecting parasympathetic nervous activity were significantly lower in patients with and without PAF recurrences after C-PVI and patients without PAF recurrences after S-PVI than patients with PAF recurrences after S-PVI ( P < 0.005 - 0.0001 ) . However , there were no significant differences in any HRV parameters in the immediate aftermath of PVI among the patients without PAF recurrences after S-PVI and those with and without PAF recurrences after C-PVI . CONCLUSION Although additional radiofrequency ablation for AM may be recommended after S-PVI to reduce PAF recurrences , it should be carefully determined after C-PVI BACKGROUND Although radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) based technologies for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have both individually been demonstrated to be effective and safe for the treatment of paroxysmal AF , head-to-head comparisons are lacking . The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation . METHODS Out of a prospect i ve registry of 327 patients undergoing PVI , 208 patients ( age 58±11 years , ejection fraction 59±6 % , left atrial size 39±6 mm ) with paroxysmal AF were identified . The presented data set was obtained by 1:1 propensity score matching and contained 142 patients undergoing CB-PVI or RF-PVI in conjunction with a 3D mapping system , respectively . We compared single procedure efficacy of the two methods using a Cox proportional hazards model . RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 28 months and a single procedure , AF recurred in 37 of 71 ( 52 % ) in the CB-PVI group and in 31 of 71 patients ( 44 % ) in the RF-PVI group ( HR [ 95 % CI]=1.19 [ 0.74 , 1.92 ] , p=0.48 ) . Recurrence of AF for PVI using solely the CB was observed in 23 of 51 ( 45 % ) patients and in 23 of 51 ( 45 % ) patients in the corresponding RF-PVI group ( HR [ 95 % CI]=0.93 [ 0.52 , 1.66 ] , p=0.81 ) . Complication rate was not different between the groups . CONCLUSION A propensity score matched comparison between CB-PVI and RF-PVI using a 3D-mapping system for AF ablation showed similar long-term success rates BACKGROUND Long-term success rates using ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) are disappointing and usually do not exceed 60 % . OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare arrhythmia-free survival between pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) and a stepwise approach ( full defrag ) consisting of PVI , ablation of complex fractionated electrograms , and additional linear ablation lines in the setting of atrial tachycardias ( AT ) in patients with persistent AF after PVI . METHODS From November 2010 to February 2013 , 205 patients ( 151 men ; 61.7 ± 10.2 years of age ) underwent de novo ablation for persistent AF . Subsequently , patients were prospect ively r and omized to either PVI alone ( n = 78 ) or full defrag ( n = 75 ) , with 52 patients not r and omized due to AF termination with the original PVI . The primary endpoint was recurrence of any AT after a blanking period of 3 months . RESULTS During the entire study , 241 ablations were performed ( mean : 1.59 in the PVI-alone group , 1.55 in the full-defrag group ) . With the stepwise approach , termination of AF occurred in 45 ( 60 % ) patients . However , arrhythmia-free survival did not differ whether patients underwent single or multiple procedures ( p = 0.468 ) . Procedure duration , fluoroscopy time , and radiofrequency duration were significantly longer in the full-defrag group ( all p < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS A stepwise approach aim ed at AF termination does not seem to provide additional benefit over PVI alone in patients with persistent AF , but it is associated with significantly longer procedural and fluoroscopic duration as well as radiofrequency application time . ( The R and omized Catheter Ablation of Persist End Atrial Fibrillation Study [ CHASE-AF ] ; NCT01580124 )
Our primary finding is that PVI performed with a wide antral approach is more effective than ostial PVI in achieving freedom from total atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up
BACKGROUND For the past decade , electric pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) has become a procedure implemented worldwide for the treatment of atrial fibrillation .
Currently , 2 main approaches are used for PVI : ostial isolation of the PVs and wide antral PVI .
The aims of this systematic review are to evaluate the relative merits of each technique with a pooled comparative analysis of efficacy and complications .