Reboxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for panic disorder. Escitalopram in the treatment of panic disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Psychopharmacological treatment of panic disorder and related states: A Placebo controlled study of alprazolam Treatment of Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia: Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trial of Four Psychosocial Treatments Combined with Imipramine or Placebo Do antidepressants selectively suppress spontaneous (unexpected) panic attacks? A replication. Clomipramine and fluoxetine effects in the treatment of panic disorder. Interactive Model of Therapeutic Response in Panic Disorder: Moclobemide, a Case in Point Efficacy of usual antidepressant dosing regimens of fluoxetine in panic disorder: randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The effect of citalopram in panic disorder. Forms of atypical depression and their response to antidepressant drugs Fluvoxamine in the treatment of panic disorder: a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in outpatients Are benzodiazepines still the medication of choice for patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia? Global measures of outcome in a controlled comparison of pharmacological and psychological treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care. The effect of mirtazapine in panic disorder: an open label pilot study with a single-blind placebo run-in period Specific Side Effects of Long-Term Imipramine Management of Panic Disorder A prospective naturalistic study of 326 panic-agoraphobic patients treated with antidepressants. Superiority of clomipramine over imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder: a placebo-controlled trial. A double-blind study of the efficacy of venlafaxine extended-release, paroxetine, and placebo in the treatment of panic disorder. Double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study of paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder. Sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder: a flexible-dose multicenter trial. The efficacy of reboxetine in the treatment-refractory patients with panic disorder: an open label study. Mirtazapine versus fluoxetine in the treatment of panic disorder. Rate of improvement during and across three treatments for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: cognitive behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or both combined.
BACKGROUND Tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) as well as benzodiazepines have been shown to be effective for the treatment of panic disorder . The introduction of SSRIs has enabled a greater underst and ing of the role of serotonin in the etiology of panic disorder ; however , the role of norepinephrine has been more challenging to ascertain . The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine , a novel selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor , in patients with panic disorder with and without agoraphobia . METHOD Eighty-two patients ( aged 18 - 65 years ) with DSM-III-R panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , were r and omly assigned to receive 6 to 8 mg/day of reboxetine ( 42 patients ) or placebo ( 40 patients ) for 8 weeks in this placebo-controlled , parallel-group , double-blind clinical trial . RESULTS Of the 82 patients enrolled in the trial , 75 were considered in the analysis ( 37 patients in the reboxetine group and 38 patients in the placebo group ) . At last assessment , there was a significant reduction in the mean number of panic attacks ( range , 9.3 - 1.2 ) and phobic symptoms ( range , 8.1 - 3.2 ) in the reboxetine group compared with the placebo group ( ranges , 8.5 - 5.8 and 7.7 - 5.2 , respectively ; p < .05 ) . Improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression , Hopkins Symptom Checklist-90 , and Sheehan Disability Scale scores were also greater in the reboxetine group compared with the placebo group . Adverse events reported more frequently with reboxetine than placebo included dry mouth ( 36 % vs. 16 % ) , constipation ( 27 % vs. 22 % ) , and insomnia ( 26 % vs. 22 % ) . CONCLUSION Reboxetine was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of panic disorder BACKGROUND Escitalopram , the therapeutically active isomer of the racemic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant citalopram , has shown significant anxiolytic effects in placebo-controlled clinical trials of social anxiety disorder , generalized anxiety disorder , and anxiety symptoms associated with major depression . This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of escitalopram in out patients diagnosed with panic disorder . METHOD Male and female out patients between 18 and 80 years of age meeting DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram , citalopram , or placebo in a study conducted from September 1999 to July 2001 . The primary measure of efficacy was panic attack frequency at week 10 relative to baseline , as assessed by the Modified Sheehan Panic and Anticipatory Anxiety Scale . RESULTS A total of 366 subjects ( 128 escitalopram patients , 119 citalopram patients , and 119 placebo patients ) received at least 1 dose of double-blind treatment . The frequency of panic attacks was statistically significantly improved ( p = .04 ) , and the increase in percentage of patients with zero panic attacks reached borderline significance ( p = .051 ) , in the escitalopram-treated group relative to the placebo-treated group . Both escitalopram and citalopram statistically significantly reduced panic disorder symptoms and severity versus placebo at endpoint ( p < /=.05 ) , as measured by the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale total score , the Clinical Global Impressions scale , the Patient Global Evaluation , and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Question naire . Treatment with escitalopram was safe and well tolerated , with a similar incidence of the most common adverse events for the escitalopram and placebo groups . The rate of discontinuation for adverse events was 6.3 % for escitalopram , 8.4 % for citalopram , and 7.6 % for placebo . CONCLUSION Escitalopram is efficacious , safe , and well tolerated in the treatment of panic disorder The paper consists of two parts . A review of the relationship of panic disorder to the phobic states and the treatment of these disorders by means of tricyclic antidepressants , MAOIs , beta blocking drugs and benzodiazepines . A double blind study of alprazolam and placebo in 118 patients with agoraphobia and panic is presented . In an eight week study alprazolam was found to be significantly superior to placebo in the treatment of panic attacks , phobic avoidance , anticipatory anxiety and general anxiety Few r and omized controlled trials have included panic disorder patients with moderate to severe agoraphobia . Therefore , this population was studied using pharmacotherapy as well as psychotherapy . At the time of the study , imipramine was widely used as a pharmacological treatment . Also , current practice guidelines for patients with panic disorder find selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants roughly comparable in terms of efficacy . Therefore , the main objective of this study is to compare four psychosocial treatments — cognitive and grade d in vivo exposure treatments , grade d in vivo exposure , cognitive treatment , and supportive therapy — to evaluate the benefits of combining cognitive therapy with exposure in vivo . These treatments were combined with imipramine or placebo for a total of eight experimental conditions . Participants presented moderate to severe agoraphobia . The method involved a r and omized , double‐blind , placebo‐controlled trial with 137 participants who completed a 14‐session protocol involving the treatments just mentioned . Measures were taken at baseline and posttreatment and at 3‐ , 6‐ , and 12‐month follow‐up . All treatment conditions were statistically and clinical ly effective in reducing self‐reported panic – agoraphobia symptoms over the 1‐year follow‐up . No statistical differences were observed between imipramine and placebo conditions . This study found that all treatment modalities helped reduce panic and agoraphobic symptomatology over a 1‐year follow‐up period . These surprising results support the need to document the relations among the various components of an intervention . This would make it possible to assess the relative efficacy of the treatment components rather than of the intervention as a whole The purpose of this study was to test the following interrelated hypotheses in a larger sample by attempting to replicate supportive results from a small therapeutic study : ( 1 ) the pathogenesis of panic disorder includes at least two identifiable components : a biological component represented by spontaneous ( unexpected ) panic attacks , and a cognitive component represented by situational attacks and especially by phobias ; ( 2 ) these components respond differently to treatment ; ( 3 ) many biological processes respond to an effective intervention in proportion to their deviance from " normal " prior to treatment ( " Law of Initial Value " ) ; and ( 4 ) the response of spontaneous panic attacks to an effective treatment conforms to that model . Previously , the authors reanalyzed an 8-week therapeutic study of panic disorder that included groups treated with  placebo  and with  imipramine ( 225 mg daily ) . The criteria of response were spontaneous panic attacks ( biological component ) , situational panic attacks ( both components ) , and agoraphobia ratings ( cognitive component ) . The analyses compared the regression lines for posttreatment status on pretreatment status in the imipramine and placebo groups . The effect of imipramine on spontaneous panic attacks fitted the hypothesized model : the pre-post slope in the placebo group was approximately 1 ( 45 degrees ) , whereas the slope in the imipramine group was approximately 0 . There was no significant difference in pre-post slopes between the imipramine and placebo groups for situational panic attacks or agoraphobia ratings . For this report , the authors applied the same approach to another larger data set from a study using a similar design , but a different antidepressant . In this multicenter , double-blind study , patients with panic disorder were r and omly assigned to receive 10 weeks of treatment with  placebo ( N = 78 ) or fluoxetine 10 mg ( N = 84 ) or 20 mg ( N = 81 ) daily . Spontaneous and situational panic attacks were registered in a daily diary , and agoraphobia was rated at each visit . Using baseline and endpoint data , fluoxetine had a statistically significant , dose-dependent , suppressive effect on spontaneous panic attacks , as measured by the pre-post slopes in the three treatment groups . The placebo group showed some response ( slope = 0.69 ) . There were no significant drug effects on situational panic attacks . On ratings of agoraphobia , the slopes in the placebo and the fluoxetine 20 mg groups did not differ , but the slope in the fluoxetine 10 mg group was significantly less than that in the placebo group , suggesting a therapeutic drug effect on agoraphobia only at the lower dose . These results are consistent with the stated hypotheses . They suggest that the therapeutic effects of antidepressants on panic disorder may be due primarily to the specific suppression of spontaneous panic attacks among patients with high baseline pathologic findings . Implication s of these results for concepts of pathogenesis , clinical practice , and therapeutic research regarding panic disorder are discussed Panic disorder ( PD ) is an acute psychobiologic reaction manifested by intense anxiety and panic attacks , that occur unpredictably with subjective sense of intense apprehension or terror , accompanied by temporary loss of the ability to plan , think , or reason and the intense desire to escape or flee the situation . Panic attacks may last from a few seconds to an hour or longer . Symptoms typically include , among others , palpitations , tachycardia , hypertension , chest pain , dyspnoea , and fear of loosing control or going crazy and vague feeling of imminent doom or death . Since pharmacotherapy of PD includes the administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants , the objective of this study was to perform a pilot double blind clinical trial design ed to compare the effects of two studied drugs in the treatment of PD . A total number of 40 patients with a history of panic disorder were r and omly assigned into two groups of 20 patients each . Hamilton anxiety rating scale and St and ard Psychiatric Interview were methods for PD assessment . One group was treated with clomipramine hydrochloride ( ANAFRANIL ) 75 mg/day and the other with fluoxetine ( OXETIN ) 60 mg/day . Both drugs were administrated by mouth ( PO ) two times-a-day in equally divided doses for 6 weeks . Both studied agents produced similar antipanic effectiveness . Favourable response was achieved in 95 % of patients treated with fluoxetine and 90 % of patients treated with clomipramine . The onset of antipanic effects was quicker in all clomipramine treated patients , while fluoxetine produced more-favourable response in male patients . The duration of treatment with both antidepressants studied should be at least 10 weeks , instead of 6 weeks It was proposed that pre-post regression slopes be used to index treatment response when the effect of baseline scores differed among treatments ( interaction between treatment and baseline score ) . Reanalyses of two studies using imipramine and fluoxetine in panic disorder showed doserelated decreases in pre-post slopes for the frequency of unexpected panic attacks , but not for the frequency of situational panic attacks or measures of agoraphobia . This report presents similar analyses of data from a study using moclobemide .  Patients ( N = 452 ) with panic disorder were r and omized to placebo  or a fixed dose of moclobemide ( 75 , 150 , 300 , 600 , or 900 mg/day ) . They were treated double-blindly and evaluated at baseline and 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , and 8 weeks later . The authors analyzed the frequency of unexpected and situational panic attacks compiled from a daily diary , and fear and avoidance ratings based on the patient ’s main phobia using baseline ( pre ) and end-point ( post ) values for all r and omized patients . Adjoining dose groups were combined . Both unexpected and situational panic attacks showed systematic doserelated suppression of pre-post treatment slopes . Neither pre-post slopes nor adjusted posttreatment means for fear and avoidance differed reliably between treatment arms . This study replicates the authors ’ earlier findings , except for situational panic attacks , which probably were not reliably identified . Antidepressants selectively suppress panic attacks , especially unexpected attacks , but not agoraphobia . The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that panic disorder with agoraphobia has clinical ly separable biologic and cognitive components that respond differentially to treatment . Antidepressants benefit primarily patients with many unexpected panic attacks . Investigators should evaluate pre-post treatment slopes before comparing adjusted posttreatment means ( analysis of covariance ) BACKGROUND Although serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective in panic disorder , questions concerning whether doses associated with antidepressant efficacy are also effective for panic disorder remain . AIMS To assess the efficacy of the usual antidepressant dose of fluoxetine in treating full panic attacks . METHOD Patients with panic disorder were r and omised to placebo or to fluoxetine initiated at 10 mg daily for 1 week and then increased to 20 mg daily . The trial lasted 12 weeks , but after 6 weeks patients who had failed to achieve a satisfactory response were eligible for dose escalation to a maximum of 60 mg of fluoxetine daily . RESULTS Fluoxetine was associated with a statistically significantly greater proportion of panic-free patients compared with placebo after 6 weeks and at end-point . CONCLUSIONS Fluoxetine at a dose of 20 mg daily is safe and efficacious in reducing symptoms of panic disorder . Patients who fail to obtain a satisfactory response at 20 mg daily may benefit from further dose increases BACKGROUND Citalopram is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor which has been demonstrated to be highly selective and with a superior tolerability profile to the classical tricyclic antidepressants . This study was design ed to test whether there was any difference in efficacy in the management of panic disorder ( PD ) between citalopram and placebo . METHOD This was a double-blind , placebo and clomipramine controlled , parallel group eight-week study . A total of 475 patients with PD , with or without agoraphobia , were r and omised to treatment with either placebo , clomipramine 60 or 90 mg/day , or citalopram 10 or 15 mg/day , or 20 or 30 mg/day , or 40 or 60 mg/day . Doses were increased over the first three weeks , stabilised during the fourth week and fixed between weeks five and eight . RESULTS Treatment with citalopram at 20 or 30 mg , 40 or 60 mg and clomipramine were significantly superior to placebo , judged by the number of patients free of panic attacks in the week prior to the final assessment . All rating scales examined suggested that citalopram 20 or 30 mg was more effective than citalopram 40 or 60 mg . CONCLUSION The most advantageous benefit/risk ratio for the treatment of PD was associated with citalopram 20 or 30 mg/day Three definitions of atypical depression are evaluated with respect to the effects of monoamine oxidase inhibitors ( MAOIs ) and tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) on the basis of pooled data from several double-blind studies . Those three definitions of atypical depression are depression with associated panic , depression secondary to a diagnosis of anxiety , and depression with reversed vegetative change . In none of these forms was a drug difference observed . However , when gender was taken into account , MAOIs were superior to TCAs in depressed women with panic attacks , whereas TCAs were superior to MAOIs in depressed men with panic attacks Serotonergic mechanisms have been implicated in panic disorder , and several preliminary studies suggest that fluvoxamine , a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI ) , is helpful in its treatment . This 8-week double-blind parallel-group study compared fluvoxamine with a placebo in 188 patients with DSM-III-R defined panic disorder with or without agoraphobia . Efficacy assessment s included a Daily Panic Attack Inventory , the Sheehan Disability Scale , the Clinical Anxiety Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale . When compared with the placebo , fluvoxamine produced highly significant improvements in most measures of the frequency and severity of panic disorder and in the more global aspects of disability and distress . Significant improvement was evident as early as week 1 for some panic variables . Fluvoxamine is a potent anti-panic agent with a relatively rapid onset of action OBJECTIVE Recently , pharmacological treatment guidelines for panic disorder have changed as newer treatment options have become available . The authors examined how the use of psychotropic drugs has shifted over the course of 10 years to determine if prescribing patterns have changed to reflect these revised treatment guidelines . METHOD A total of 443 patients with panic disorder were enrolled in the Harvard/Brown Anxiety Research Project , a prospect i ve longitudinal study of anxiety disorders . These patients were interviewed over the course of 10 years to examine their use of psychotropic medications . RESULTS Despite efforts aim ed at increasing the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) in patients with panic disorder ( e.g. , APA 's practice guideline for panic disorder , Food and Drug Administration approval of particular SSRIs for the treatment of panic disorder ) , only a modest increase in their use was found . Treatment patterns for psychotropic drugs  appear to have remained stable over the past decade , with benzodiazepines being the most commonly used medication for panic disorder . In comparison , SSRI use throughout the follow-up period has remained low . Patients using an SSRI did not have a more favorable clinical course than those using a benzodiazepine , nor were there significantly better rates of remission in patients using SSRIs and benzodiazepines concomitantly . CONCLUSIONS These results highlight a gap between pharmacological treatment guidelines and actual delivery of care in that recommendations to use SSRIs to treat panic disorder are not being followed . Factors potentially associated with promoting and ignoring treatment recommendations are discussed BACKGROUND Panic disorder , with and without agoraphobia , is a prevalent condition which presents primarily in general practice . Previous clinical outcome studies have been conducted mainly in specialist university departments or hospital setting s , and have tended to employ complex rating scales that are not well suited for use as outcome measures in primary care . AIM To evaluate the outcome , in a primary care setting , of fluvoxamine versus cognitive behaviour therapy , each used alone and in combination in a double-blind placebo-controlled framework , balanced for therapist contact . METHOD A total of 149 patients satisfying DSMIII-R criteria for panic disorder were r and omly allocated to receive one of the following : fluvoxamine , placebo , fluvoxamine plus cognitive behaviour therapy , placebo plus cognitive behaviour therapy , and cognitive behaviour therapy alone . These five treatment groups represent the minimum number acceptable for such a comparison to be made . All patients received an identical schedule of contact over 13 weeks . Measures of symptom severity , general health and social disruption were taken at entry point and end point ; measures of change in symptoms were taken at end point only . Outcome was reported in terms of brief global ratings of severity of illness and change in symptoms , and of ratings of general health and social disruption that are suitable for use in general practice . RESULTS All active treatment groups showed statistically significant advantages over placebo over a range of outcome ratings . The groups employing cognitive behaviour therapy showed the most robust and consistent response . CONCLUSION The brief global measures reported here proved adequate to the task of assessing treatment outcome . Results indicate that treatments including cognitive behaviour therapy can be effective in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care In this open label pilot study , we studied the efficacy of mirtazapine ( Remeron ) in panic disorder . Twenty-eight patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia ( 10 males/18 females ) , were included and 19 patients completed the study . The 15-week trial started with a 3-week single-blind placebo run-in period . After this run-in period , the 12-week active treatment phase started . As primary efficacy measures , we studied the decrease in the number of full symptom panic attacks and the number of patients completely free of panic during the last 3 weeks of the study . Seventy-four percent of the patients were considered responders , according to a decrease of at least 50 % in panic attack frequency . All primary and secondary efficacy measures showed a significant improvement from the second week of active treatment onwards to endpoint . The main side-effects were different from the usual side-effects in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) ( initial drowsiness , weight gain and pain in the legs ) . The results of this open label study in panic disorder suggest that mirtazapine seems to be a fast and effective treatment alternative for SSRIs in panic disorder In a recent study , the authors suggested that tachycardia , dry mouth , and sweating continued to burden patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia who have shown marked and stable response to 6 months of imipramine treatment at the fixed , weight-adjusted dose of 2.25 mg/kg/day . Although sexual dysfunction and weight gain were not a significant burden in that study , they are important problems in long-term treatment with antidepressant drugs . In the present study , in the context of a r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled , 1-year discontinuation and maintenance study of 53 patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia who respond to imipramine  , the authors examine the extent and the specificity of these five side effects of imipramine maintenance using data at pretreatment , at the end of 24 weeks of open imipramine treatment ( or month 0 of r and omization ) , and at months 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , and 12 of r and omized treatment . Hierarchical linear modeling and repeated measures of analyses of variance in sub sample s of completers confirmed that dry mouth , sweating , and increased heart rate constitute a significant and specific enduring burden of imipramine maintenance treatment . The data also revealed that weight gain is a significant and specific side effect of 1-year imipramine maintenance treatment ; however , the likelihood of reporting sexual dysfunction decreased over time , with no difference between the placebo and imipramine maintenance conditions . The results are discussed in the context of previous studies of imipramine  side effects in the management of depression and the available literature of sexual and weight side effects of antidepressant medications in the treatment of anxiety disorders OBJECTIVE How far the results of r and omized controlled studies apply to everyday care can not be judged without regular measurements of outcomes in daily practice . We report on systematic data from a 3-year naturalistic prospect i ve study on panic disorder-agoraphobic ( PDA ) patients treated with antidepressants in a setting of routine clinical practice . Our aim is to describe the evolution of PDA in relation to the treatments employed , and to explore demographic and clinical characteristics that might be predictive of outcome . METHODS 326 DSM-III-R PDA patients treated with antidepressants in a setting of routine clinical practice were included in a 3-year naturalistic prospect i ve study . We utilized structured and semi-structures instruments , including the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis and the Longitudinal Interview Follow-up Examination . The main antidepressants used were imipramine ( 39 % ) , clomipramine ( 28.5 % ) and paroxetine ( 23.3 % ) ; only 9 % of patients received other antidepressants . RESULTS 147 patients ( 45.1 % ) stayed on medication throughout the entire period of the follow-up . Of those who interrupted the treatment , 38 % stayed in remission . The probability of achieving at least one remission during the 3-year follow-up period was 96.5 % for PD and 95.9 % for Agoraphobia . Relapses after a period of at least 2 months of complete remission were also common , and the probability of presenting at least one relapse during the 3-years follow-up period was 67.1 % for PD and 39 % for Agoraphobia . The longest period of remission of PD is associated with low severity , medium-lasting course in patients with an onset of the illness in young adulthood . Less severe agoraphobia associated with moderately severe panic attacks appears to confer a better control of phobic behavior . All three major drugs were reasonably well tolerated ( only 9 % dropped out because of side effects ) , with sexual dysfunction and increased appetite being the most common side effects at the last evaluation ; in the first phase of the treatment anticholinergic effects and jitteriness were more common with TCAs . CONCLUSION Both classical antidepressants and paroxetine emerge as a useful treatment in the long-term management of PDA ; paroxetine appears particularly useful in PDA patients because it was significantly less likely to induce jitteriness , thereby reducing barriers to compliance A double-blind , placebo-controlled trial was undertaken to compare the effects of imipramine and clomipramine in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia . The number of dropouts in the placebo-treated group was 7 ; in the imipramine-treated group , 4 ; and in the clomipramine treated group , 0 . Ten subjects fulfilled the 12 weeks of treatment in the placebo group , 25 in the imipramine group , and 22 in the clomipramine group . To minimize dropouts because of side effects , a flexible dose regimen with a careful escalation of doses was applied . The maximal dose allowed was 250 mg/day . The mean ( + /- SEM ) daily doses reached were 124 + /- 9 mg ( range , 50 - 250 mg ) of imipramine and 109 + /- 8 mg ( range , 25 - 200 mg ) of clomipramine . At the end of the trial , the number of panic attacks as well as the anxiety between attacks ( measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety ) were markedly reduced in patients treated with either of the two antidepressant drugs , but only slightly decreased in patients on placebo . With respect to all major outcome parameters , i.e. , full panic attacks , total number of anxiety attacks ( full plus mild ) , and anxiety between attacks , the effect of clomipramine was clearly and significantly superior to that of imipramine ( p less than 0.001 , p less than 0.002 , and p less than 0.002 , respectively ) . Moderate intake of diazepam was allowed ; in the clomipramine group ( p less than 0.006 ) , but neither in the imipramine group nor in the placebo group , a significant decrement in diazepam intake was observed during the course of the trial . The finding that clomipramine may have a higher potency and /or efficacy than imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder supports the concept that the antipanic effect of antidepressant drugs is due to the influence of these compounds on serotonergic rather than noradrenergic neurotransmission To date , no large-scale , controlled trial comparing a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with placebo for the treatment of panic disorder has been reported . This double-blind study compares the efficacy of venlafaxine extended-release ( ER ) and paroxetine with placebo . A total of 664 nondepressed adult out patients who met DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder ( with or without agoraphobia ) were r and omly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with placebo or fixed-dose venlafaxine ER ( 75 mg/day or 150 mg/day ) , or paroxetine 40 mg/day . The primary measure was the percentage of patients free from full-symptom panic attacks , assessed with the Panic and Anticipatory Anxiety Scale ( PAAS ) . Secondary measures included the Panic Disorder Severity Scale , Clinical Global Impressions -- Severity ( CGI-S ) and --Improvement ( CGI-I ) scales ; response ( CGI-I rating of very much improved or much improved ) , remission ( CGI-S rating of not at all ill or borderline ill and no PAAS full-symptom panic attacks ) ; and measures of depression , anxiety , phobic fear and avoidance , anticipatory anxiety , functioning , and quality of life . Intent-to-treat , last observation carried forward analysis showed that mean improvement on most measures was greater with venlafaxine ER or paroxetine than with placebo . No significant differences were observed between active treatment groups . Panic-free rates at end point with active treatment ranged from 54 % to 61 % , compared with 35 % for placebo . Approximately 75 % of patients given active treatment were responders , and nearly 45 % achieved remission . The placebo response rate was slightly above 55 % , with remission near 25 % . Adverse events were mild or moderate and similar between active treatment groups . Venlafaxine ER and paroxetine were effective and well tolerated in the treatment of panic disorder OBJECTIVE This study was design ed to determine the minimum paroxetine dose effective for treating panic disorder . METHOD Of 425 patients with DSM-III-R panic disorder with or without agoraphobia who underwent a 2-week drug-free screening period , 278 patients were r and omly assigned to double-blind treatment with a 10-week course of placebo or paroxetine at a dose of 10 , 20 , or 40 mg/day . RESULTS At 40 mg/day , paroxetine was superior to placebo across the majority of outcome measures . Despite a mean of 9.5 to 11.6 full panic attacks during the screening period , 86.0 % of the patients taking 40 mg of paroxetine , 65.2 % of those taking 20 mg , 67.4 % of those taking 10 mg , and 50.0 % of the placebo-treated patients were free of full panic attacks during the 2 weeks ending at week 10 . The 40-mg paroxetine group experienced significantly greater global improvement than the placebo group and significantly greater improvement in frequency of full and limited-symptom panic attacks , intensity of full panic attacks , phobic fear , anxiety , and depressive symptoms , usually evident by week 4 . All doses of paroxetine were well tolerated , and adverse effects were consistent with those associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors . CONCLUSIONS Paroxetine is an effective and well-tolerated short-term treatment of panic disorder . The minimum dose demonstrated to be significantly superior to placebo was 40 mg/day , although some patients did respond at lower doses BACKGROUND The serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors are increasingly being used for the treatment of panic disorder . We examined the efficacy and safety of the serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor sertraline hydrochloride in patients with panic disorder . METHODS One hundred seventy-six nondepressed out patients with panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , from 10 sites followed identical protocol s that used a flexible-dose design . After 2 weeks of single-blind placebo , patients were r and omly assigned to 10 weeks of double-blind , flexible-dose treatment with either sertraline hydrochloride ( 50 - 200 mg/d ) or placebo . RESULTS Sertraline-treated patients exhibited significantly greater improvement ( P=.01 ) at end point than did patients treated with placebo for the primary outcome variable , panic attack frequency . Significant differences between groups were also evident for clinician and patient assessment s of improvement as measured by the Clinical Global Impression Improvement ( P=.01 ) and Severity ( P=.009 ) Scales , Panic Disorder Severity Scale ratings ( P=.03 ) , high end-state function assessment ( P=.03 ) , Patient Global Evaluation rating ( P=.01 ) , and quality of life scores ( P=.003 ) . Adverse events , generally characterized as either mild or moderate , were not significantly different in overall incidence between the sertraline and placebo groups . CONCLUSION Results support the safety and efficacy of sertraline for the short-term treatment of patients with panic disorder BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are currently the first-line treatment for panic disorder , although up to 30 % of patients either do not respond to SSRIs or withdraw due to adverse events . Reboxetine , a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ( selective NRI ) , is effective in treating depression and may alleviate depression-related anxiety . This study aim ed to investigate the efficacy of reboxetine in the treatment of patients with panic disorder who did not respond to SSRIs . METHOD In this 6-week , open-label study , 29 adult out patients with panic disorder who had previously failed to respond to SSRI treatment received reboxetine 2 mg/day , titrated to a maximum of 8 mg/day over the first 10 days .  Efficacy was assessed using the Panic Self- Question naire ( PSQ ) , the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety ( HAM-A ) , the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ( HRSD ) and the Global Assessment of Functioning ( GAF ) Scale . RESULTS The 24 patients who completed the study responded well to reboxetine treatment . Significant improvement ( p < 0.001 ) was observed in the number of daily panic attacks , and on the scales measuring anxiety , depression and functioning . Reboxetine was generally well tolerated . Five patients withdrew due to  adverse events . CONCLUSIONS Reboxetine appears to be effective in the treatment of SSRI-refractory panic disorder patients and warrants further clinical investigation Mirtazapine is an antidepressant whose side effect profile differs from that of first-line agents ( selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ) used in the treatment of panic disorder . The present study compared the effect of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in the treatment of panic disorder in a double-blind , r and omized , flexible-dose trial conducted with out patients . After a 1-week single-blind placebo run-in , 27 patients entered an 8-week double-blind phase in which they were r and omly assigned to treatment with either mirtazapine or fluoxetine . Both groups improved significantly in all but one efficacy measure ( P < or = 0.01 ) . ANOVA showed no significant differences between the two treatment groups in number of panic attacks , Hamilton Anxiety Scale or Sheehan Phobic Scale , whereas measures of patient global evaluation of phobic anxiety were significantly different between groups ( F1,20 = 6.91 , P = 0.016 ) favoring mirtazapine . For the 22 patients who completed the study , the mean daily dose of mirtazapine was 18.3 + /- 1.3 vs 14.0 + /- 1.0 mg for fluoxetine at the endpoint . Weight gain occurred more frequently in the mirtazapine group ( 50 vs 7.7 % , P = 0.04 ) and nausea and paresthesia occurred more often in the fluoxetine group ( P = 0.01 ) . Results suggest that mirtazapine has properties that make it attractive for the treatment of panic disorder BACKGROUND Existing literature on panic disorder ( PD ) yields no data regarding the differential rates of improvement during Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ( CBT ) , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor ( SSRI ) or both combined ( CBT+SSRI ) . METHOD Patients were r and omized to CBT , SSRI or CBT+SSRI which each lasted one year including three months of medication taper . Participating patients kept record of the frequency of panic attacks throughout the full year of treatment . Rate of improvement on panic frequency and the relationship between rate of improvement and baseline agoraphobia ( AG ) were examined . RESULTS A significant decline in frequency of panic attacks was observed for each treatment modality . SSRI and CBT+SSRI were associated with a significant faster rate of improvement as compared to CBT . Gains were maintained after tapering medication . For patients with moderate or severe AG , CBT+SSRI was associated with a more rapid improvement on panic frequency as compared to patients receiving either mono-treatment . LIMITATIONS Frequency of panic attacks was not assessed beyond the full year of treatment . Second , only one process variable was used . CONCLUSIONS Patients with PD respond well to each treatment as indicated by a significant decline in panic attacks .  CBT is associated with a slower rate of improvement as compared to SSRI and CBT+SSRI . Discontinuation of SSRI treatment does not result in a revival of frequency of panic attacks . Our data suggest that for patients without or with only mild AG , SSRI-only will suffice . For patients with moderate or severe AG , the combined CBT+SSRI treatment is recommended
We observed the same finding when classes of antidepressants were compared with placebo .
When looking at dropouts due to adverse effects , which can be considered as a measure of tolerability , we found moderate- quality evidence showing that antidepressants as a whole are less well tolerated than placebo .
The identified studies comprehensively address the objectives of the present review .Based on these results , antidepressants may be more effective than placebo in treating panic disorder .
Antidepressants may also have benefit in comparison with placebo in terms of number of dropouts , but a less favourable profile in terms of dropout due to adverse effects .
However , the tolerability profile varied between different classes of antidepressants .
BACKGROUND Panic disorder is characterised by repeated , unexpected panic attacks , which represent a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset , reaches a peak within 10 minutes , and in which at least four of 13 characteristic symptoms are experienced , including racing heart , chest pain , sweating , shaking , dizziness , flushing , stomach churning , faintness and breathlessness .
It is common in the general population with a lifetime prevalence of 1 % to 4 % .
The treatment of panic disorder includes psychological and pharmacological interventions .
Amongst pharmacological agents , the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ( NICE ) and the British Association for Psychopharmacology consider antidepressants , mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) , as the first-line treatment for panic disorder , due to their more favourable adverse effect profile over monoamine oxidase inhibitors ( MAOIs ) and tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) .
Several classes of antidepressants have been studied and compared , but it is still unclear which antidepressants have a more or less favourable profile in terms of effectiveness and acceptability in the treatment of this condition .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of antidepressants for panic disorder in adults , specifically:1 .
to determine the efficacy of antidepressants in alleviating symptoms of panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , in comparison to placebo;2 .
to review the acceptability of antidepressants  in panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , in comparison with placebo ; and 3 .
to investigate the adverse effects of antidepressants  in panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , including the general prevalence of adverse effects , compared to placebo .