Effectiveness of workplace interventions in rehabilitating musculoskeletal disorders and preventing its consequences among workers with physical and sedentary employment: systematic review protocol Reducing musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators: comparison between ergonomics interventions at the workplace Workplace Prevention and Musculoskeletal Injuries in Nurses Effectiveness of participatory training for prevention of musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial Musculoskeletal disorders and occupational exposures: How should we judge the evidence concerning the causal association? Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Early Workplace Intervention for Employees With Musculoskeletal-Related Absenteeism: A Prospective Controlled Intervention Study A Health System Program To Reduce Work Disability Related to Musculoskeletal Disorders Evaluation of ‘I-Preventive’: a digital preventive tool for musculoskeletal disorders in computer workers—a pilot cluster randomised trial Are Work Disability Prevention Interventions Effective for the Management of Neck Pain or Upper Extremity Disorders? A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration Effect of yogic exercises on symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders of upper limbs among computer users: a randomised controlled trial. Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. Health-related effects of early part-time sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job satisfaction among office-workers: a cross-sectional study from Iran. Physical activity is associated with a low prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in the Royal Norwegian Navy: a cross sectional study Effectiveness of early part-time sick leave in musculoskeletal disorders Physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in New Zealand nurses, postal workers and office workers Musculoskeletal work disability for clinicians: time course and effectiveness of a specialized intervention program by diagnosis. Coordinated and Tailored Work Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Economic Evaluation Undertaken with Workers on Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders The implementation of occupational health guidelines principles for reducing sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. A prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. The effect of workplace intervention on pain and sickness absence caused by upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Promoting work ability in a structured national rehabilitation program in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: outcomes and predictors in a prospective cohort study
Background Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are the leading cause of work disability and sickness absence worldwide . The prevalence of MSDs increases with age , consequently challenging sustainable employability among the growing ageing workforce . Knowledge of feasible and efficient workplace-based interventions to rehabilitate MSD or prevent its consequences is therefore warranted . This systematic review will evaluate the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions on MSDs and its consequences among adult workers with physical and sedentary work tasks , respectively . Methods We will search the following bibliographic data bases : PubMed ( including the data base ‘ MEDLINE ’ ) and Web of Science Core Collection ( including the data bases ‘ Science Citation Index Exp and ed ’ , ‘ Social Sciences Citation Index ’ and ‘ Arts & Humanities Citation Index ’ ) . Manual search es will also be performed . We will include r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) and non- RCTs reported in English in which ( 1 ) participants are adult workers with MSD , ( 2 ) interventions are aim ing at rehabilitating pain symptoms of MSD or preventing the consequences of MSD and ( 3 ) interventions are initiated and /or carried out at the workplace . The review will adhere to the ‘ Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review s and Meta-Analyses ’ ( PRISMA ) guidelines for reporting systematic review s and the Institute for Work and Health ( IWH ) guidelines for workplace-based interventions . For the primary evaluation of the review , the quality assessment and evidence synthesis will conform to the IWH guidelines . Secondary evaluation will include a meta- analysis ( unless the included studies do not allow this due to heterogeneity ) and employ the risk of bias domains recommended by Cochrane along with the Grading of Recommendations , Assessment , Development and Evaluations ( GRADE ) approach on the studies with pain intensity as an outcome . Discussion This systematic review will provide knowledge on effective workplace-based interventions among physical and sedentary workers with MSD . RCTs are considered the most powerful experimental design in clinical trials , but solely including these may be too restrictive to underst and effective workplace-based interventions where r and omised and carefully controlled trials ( RCTs ) are not always possible . In order to maximize practical relevance , the selection process will , therefore , include both RCTs and non- RCTs and the quality assessment and evidence synthesis will conform to IWH guidelines focusing on developing practical guidelines for stakeholders . The result of this work will form the basis for industry-specific evidence -based recommendations on effective workplace-based interventions for rehabilitation of MSDs and its consequences that will later be operationalised into concrete and user-friendly practical tools for workplaces . Systematic review registration International Prospect i ve Register of Systematic Review s ( PROSPERO ) number CRD42018116752 Typing is associated with musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) caused by multiple risk factors . This control study aim ed to evaluate the efficacy of a workplace intervention for reducing  MSDs among computer workers . Sixty-six subjects with and without MSD were assigned consecutively to one of three groups : ergonomics intervention ( work site and body posture adjustments , muscle activity training and exercises ) accompanied with biofeedback training , the same ergonomics intervention without biofeedback and a control group . Evaluation of MSDs , body posture , psychosocial status , upper extremity ( UE ) kinematics and muscle surface electromyography were carried out before and after the intervention in the workplace and the motion lab . Our main hypothesis that significant differences in the reduction of MSDs will exist between subjects in the study groups and controls was confirmed ( χ2 = 13.3 ; p = 0.001 ) . Significant changes were found in UE kinematics and posture as well . Both ergonomics interventions effectively reduced MSD and improved body posture . Practitioner Summary : This study aim ed to test the efficacy of an individual workplace intervention programme among computer workers by evaluating musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , body posture , upper extremity kinematics , muscle activity and psychosocial factors were tested . The proposed ergonomics interventions effectively reduced MSDs and improved body posture Objective The purpose of this study was to describe the availability of preventive devices and training in relation to neck , shoulder , and back musculoskeletal injuries/disorders ( MSD ) in registered nurses . Summary background data Nurses have one of the highest rates of MSD of any occupation . Studies have shown that mechanical lifting devices and lifting teams can reduce MSD rates and associated costs . Methods Data from 1163 r and omly selected currently working nurses ( 1 + years on the current job ) were collected in anonymous mailed surveys ( 74 % response rate ) . MSD cases had neck , shoulder , and /or back symptoms for at least 1 week , or at least monthly , and moderate or more pain , in the past year . Results Nurses with mechanical lifting devices available were significantly less likely to have neck or back MSDs . Back injury was less likely when lifting teams were available . However , adjustable beds and transfer sheets were associated with greater odds of back MSD . Training in workstation adjustment was associated with significantly lower MSD prevalence , though postural training was not . Conclusions Though use of mechanical devices and lifting teams was limited in nursing workplaces , these prevention strategies were related to reduced odds of MSD . Nursing administrators can use these findings to consider workplace changes Purpose Health and safety training program has been applied to prevent work-related  musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in workplace . We evaluated the effectiveness of participatory training and didactic training programs on MSD prevention among frontline workers in Shenzhen , China . Methods The authors r and omly assigned 918 workers from intervention factories to receive participatory training ( intervention group ) , and 907 workers from intervention factories and 1,654 workers from control factories to receive didactic training ( control_1 group , control_2 group , respectively ) from June 1 , 2008 to November 30 , 2009 . Participants were asked to report experience of ache , pain or discomfort in 10 body parts at baseline and 1 year after training . Data were analyzed to compare the MSD prevalence 1 year before and 1 year after training in different groups from 2009 to 2010 . Results The follow-up rate was 61 % ( 2,120/3,479 ) at 1 year after training . In the year after training , there were no statistically significant changes in the proportion of workers who reported MSD in any body part . MSD prevalence rates in the intervention group reduced from 16.8 to 9.9 % for lower extremities ( χ2 = 13.102 , p < 0.001 ) and from 12.9 to 8.3 % ( χ2 = 9.433 , p = 0.002 ) for wrist and finger at 1 year after training . However , the rates did not change significantly for upper back , lower back , neck , shoulder and elbow in the intervention group and for all 10 body parts in two control groups . Conclusions Overall , the training programs did not seem to prevent the occurrence of MSD among frontline workers . However , participatory training might be effective to reduce MSD in the lower extremities and wrist and finger Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) affecting the back , upper and lower extremities are widespread in the general population , implying a variety of causal factors . Multiple causes are not mutually exclusive , and a high background rate does not preclude associations with specific factors that are uncommon in the general population . MSDs have well-documented associations with occupational ergonomic stressors such as repetitive motion , heavy lifting , non-neutral postures , and vibration . Organizational features of the work environment , such as time pressure and low decision latitude , may also play a role , at least by potentiating the effects of physical loading . Numerous systematic review s have mostly concurred with these overall findings . Nevertheless , some continue to debate whether MSDs are sometimes work-related , even for those performing jobs with repetitive and routinized tasks , heavy lifting , and /or pronounced postural strain . This article discusses ( 1 ) some epidemiologic features of MSDs that underlie that debate ; and ( 2 ) the question of what should appropriately be considered a gold st and ard for scientific evidence on an etiological question such as the health effects of a non-voluntary exposure , such as an occupational or environmental agent . In particular , r and omized clinical trials have little relevance for determining the health effects of non-therapeutic risk factors OBJECTIVE Since 2002 , an epidemiologic surveillance system of work-related , upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) has been implemented in France 's Pays de la Loire region to assess the prevalence of MSDs and their risk factors in the working population . METHODS The surveillance was based on a network of occupational physicians ( OPs ) and used the recommendations of a group of European experts ( criteria document consensus ) . In 2002 - 2003 , 80 of 400 OPs volunteered to participate . All underwent a training program to st and ardize the physical examination .  Health status was assessed by self-administered question naire and physical examination . Occupational risk factors were assessed by self-administered question naire .  Exposure scores were computed for each anatomic zone by summing the risk factors taken into account by the criteria document . RESULTS More than 50 % of the 2,685 men and women r and omly included in 2002 - 2003 experienced nonspecific musculoskeletal symptoms during the preceeding 12 months and approximately 30 % experienced them in the preceeding week . The prevalence of clinical ly diagnosed MSDs was high : approximately 13 % of workers experienced at least 1 of the MSDs . The most frequent disorder was rotator cuff syndrome followed by carpal tunnel syndrome and lateral epicondylitis . The prevalence of MSDs increased with age and varied widely across economic sectors and occupations . More than half of the workers were exposed to at least 2 risk factors of MSDs . Exposure varied according to industrial activity and occupation . According to the criteria document , a high percentage of MSD cases could be classified as probably work related ( 95 % in men and 89 % in women age < 50 , and 87 % in men and 69 % in women age > 50 ) . CONCLUSION Nonspecific upper-limb symptoms and specific upper-limb MSDs are common in the working population . These results show the need to implement prevention programs in most sectors to reduce the prevalence of MSDs Sickness absenteeism caused by musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) is a persistent and costly occupational health challenge . In a prospect i ve controlled trial , we compared the effects on sickness absenteeism of a more proactive role for insurance case managers as well as workplace ergonomic interventions with that of traditional case management .  Patients with physician-diagnosed MSDs were r and omized either to the  intervention group or  the reference group offered the traditional case management routines . Participants filled out a comprehensive question naire at the initiation of the study and after 6 months . In addition , administrative data were collected at 0 , 6 , and 12 months after the initiation of the project . For the entire 12-month period , the total mean number of sick days for the intervention group was 144.9 ( SEM 11.8 ) days/person as compared to 197.9 ( 14.0 ) days in the reference group ( P < 0.01 ) . Compared with the reference group , employees in the intervention group significantly more often received a complete rehabilitation investigation ( 84 % versus 27 % ) . The time for doing this was reduced by half ( 59.4 ( 5.2 ) days versus 126.8 ( 19.2 ) , P < .01 ) . The odds ratio for returning to work in the intervention group was 2.5 ( 95 % confidence interval 1.2–5.1 ) as compared with the reference group . The direct cost savings were USD 1195 per case , yielding a direct benefit-to-cost ratio of 6.8 . It is suggested that the management of MSDs should to a greater degree focus on early return to work and building on functional capacity and employee ability . Allowing the case managers a more active role as well as involving an ergonomist in workplace adaptation meetings might also be beneficial Context Nonoccupational musculoskeletal disorders account for a large proportion of work disability and represent a major financial burden on society . Contribution A voluntary , r and omized , controlled intervention study consisted of avoidance of bed rest , early mobilization , avoidance of splints , stretching exercises , ergonomic training , provision of educational booklets , and suggestions for optimal levels of physical activity . Although return to work was never forced , temporary work disability , long-term disability , and costs were significantly decreased in the intervention group . Implication s The personal and financial impact of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders ( not related to work injury ) may be mitigated by a voluntary program of education and rehabilitation . The Editors Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are prevalent and potentially disabling conditions ( 1 ) that consume a large proportion of health care re sources ( 2 - 4 ) and together are the leading cause of functional loss in adults ( 3 - 8 ) . The social costs of MSDs are enormous , often overshadowing those of other chronic conditions ( 9 , 10 ) . In industrialized societies , MSDs are one of the most common causes of temporary work disability and the chief cause of permanent work disability ( 11 ) , accounting for productivity losses equivalent to 1.3 % of the U.S. gross national product ( 12 ) . Work disability related to MSDs is a challenge to employability , business productivity , and the capacity of health and social security systems . Various strategies for addressing MSD-related work disability have been promoted in the field of occupational health , including strategies involving legislation , risk management , ergonomics , prevention , education , and social work ( 13 ) . However , the role of health systems remains ill-defined in this field . The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an intervention program , integrated into the health system and offered to the working population , could reduce the impact of recent-onset MSD-related temporary work disability . Methods Setting Of the 5.5 million persons in Madrid , Spain , 98 % receive health coverage from the Instituto Madrileo de Salud . Care is organized into 11 health districts . Patients have direct access to primary care physicians , who refer patients to specialized care if needed . Disability compensation payments are made by the Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social ( INSS ) , a division of the Ministry of Work . Any worker who requires sick leave is given a temporary work disability initiation form that states the diagnosis made by the primary care physician and entitles the worker to receive INSS compensation payments . The form is renewed weekly by the primary care physician until the worker 1 ) recovers and receives an ending form , 2 ) reaches a maximum of 18 months of temporary work disability , or 3 ) receives a proposal for evaluation for permanent work disability . Proposals for permanent work disability are evaluated by the INSS , which determines the need for and type of long-term compensation . Inspection services in each health district oversee all administrative aspects of these processes . Design We did a r and omized , controlled study , unblinded for both patients and physicians , to test whether a clinical intervention could improve the outcome of patients with recent-onset MSD-related temporary work disability . The study began in March 1998 in health district 7 and in March 1999 in health districts 4 and 9 . Selection and r and omization of patients was done during the first year of the study in each district . Follow-up lasted for another year . Patients and Selection Criteria Health districts 4 , 7 , and 9 were chosen . Health district 4 had a total population of 508249 persons and an active working population of 192939 persons ; health district 7 had a total population of 522742 persons and an active working population of 179155 persons ; and health district 9 had a total population of 371294 persons and an active working population of 135475 persons ( 14 ) . The inclusion criterion was the issue of a common diseases temporary work disability initiation form , with an MSD-related cause reported by the primary care physician , within the inclusion period . The MSD-related causes included all arthropathies , connective tissue disorders , back disorders , soft-tissue rheumatisms , bone and cartilage disorders , musculoskeletal pain not caused by cancer , and nerve entrapment syndromes . Patients were excluded if they had a common diseases temporary work disability form with an MSD-related cause result ing from trauma or surgery . They were also excluded if they had work accidents or professional diseases noted on the temporary work disability initiation form . Work accidents are primarily sudden , external , violent causes of disease occurring at work or during travel to work , and they represent less than 27 % of cases of temporary work disability . Professional diseases include silicosis , asbestos-related mesothelioma , and noise-induced hearing loss , and they represent less than 1 % of cases of temporary work disability . R and omization All temporary work disability initiation forms meeting the selection criteria were collected daily by a study rheumatologist and coded . The patients associated with the forms were r and omly assigned to either the intervention group , which received a specific care program , or the  control group  , which received st and ard care ( Figure 1 ) . Computer-generated lists of pseudor and om numbers were produced for each district . Group assignments were r and omly done in blocks of 50 patients with intervention : control ratios of 1:1 in district 7 and 2:3 in districts 4 and 9 . This was done so that similar numbers of patients would be seen by the rheumatologists in all areas . The ratios were based on the number of episodes of MSD-related temporary work disability registered in previous years . Patients maintained their group assignments in successive episodes of MSD-related temporary work disability during follow-up . Figure 1 . Flow diagram of the study . Care in the Intervention Group A secretary contacted all patients assigned to the intervention group by telephone or mail as soon as possible after the initiation form was issued , offering them an appointment in the program . Patients who voluntarily decided to enter the program were attended by 2 rheumatologists in each district who worked full-time for the study . Patients were seen as often as necessary until the episode of temporary work disability was resolved or recovery was deemed unrealistic . Patients who were assigned to the intervention group but were unable or unwilling to participate , were already working , or could not be located were considered to be assigned to the intervention group throughout the study for statistical purpose s. Within the intervention program , care was delivered in regular visits and included education , clinical management , and administrative duties . Education At the first 45-minute visit , patients received a specific diagnosis , reassurance that no serious disease was present , instructions on self-management , instructions on taking medications on a fixed schedule , and information on indications for return to work before complete symptom remission . Return to work was negotiated with patients and was never forced on them . Instructions on self-management included instructions to avoid bed rest , instructions to promote early mobilization of the painful regions , restrictions on the use of splint and neck collars , training in stretching and strengthening exercises ( 15 - 18 ) , teaching of ergonomic care ( 19 ) , delivery of booklets in instances of back or neck pain ( 19 ) , and information on optimal levels of physical activity ( 20 ) . Patients with higher degrees of disability or abnormal pain behavior received immediate extra reassurance , information on pain-relieving positions , and a telephone call or second visit within 72 hours . Specific protocol s were created for low-back ( 21 ) , neck , shoulder , arm and h and , knee , and foot pain ( 19 , 22 - 25 ) and included the 3-level clinical -management system described later . Moving a patient from the lower to the upper levels of the system implied the need for further diagnostic or therapeutic procedures and was indicated 1 ) after a patient spent a predefined period at the lower level without return to work or substantial clinical improvement or 2 ) by the clinical judgment of the rheumatologist . At the first level of the system , patients received the clinical management started at the first visit , including a diagnosis based on clinical criteria , pharmacologic treatment of pain and inflammation , pharmacologic treatment of anxiety and depression , peripheral intra- and periarticular injections ( 26 ) , and education . Time spent at the first level averaged 2 to 6 weeks . At the second level , patients received maintenance of therapy plus referral for formal rehabilitation and laboratory tests , radiography , computerized tomography , magnetic resonance imaging , and electromyography . After 4 to 8 weeks with no improvement at the second level , patients were moved to the third level and received further diagnostic procedures or referral for surgical or other specialized care . Red flags were defined , including age older than 50 years for patients with axial pain , previous trauma , cancer , serious medical illness , inflammatory pain , night pain , drug abuse , corticosteroid use , fever , weight loss , progressively deteriorating function , and progressive neurologic deficit . The presence of a red flag precluded the use of the level system , and the patient in question was managed according to clinical criteria , with a focus on excluding serious illness . Treatment Failures Patients who did not respond to interventions at the second level of the system were examined for the presence of yellow flags , which included psychiatric illness , family problems , sociolabor conflicts , unemployment , and occupational causes of disability . The presence of a Objectives I-Preventive is a digital preventive tool for musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in computer workers . We sought to determine its impact on pain in computer workers with upper limb MSDs and visual discomfort . Methods We conducted a pilot cluster r and omised trial in 2 different sites of a tyre factory in France . We r and omised 200 employees to either an  intervention group ( I-Preventive ) or control group  , each comprising symptomatic and asymptomatic employees . The workers were followed up for 5 months . The main outcome was overall recovery from symptoms following 1 month 's intervention based on Nordic-style and eyestrain question naires . Results We included 185/200 workers : 96 in the intervention group ( mean age 41.8±1.4 years ; 88.5 % males ) and 79 in the control group ( mean age 42.9±12.0 years ; 94.5 % males ) . The most painful areas ( numerical scale ≥2 ) were the neck ( 40.0 % ) , upper back ( 18.8 % ) and shoulders ( 15.7 % ) . For the most painful anatomical area , the Nordic score significantly decreased after 1 month in the intervention group ( p=0.038 ) ; no change was observed in the control group ( p=0.59 ) . After 1 month 's use , the intervention group reported less pain in the painful area and less visual discomfort symptoms ( p=0.02 ) . Adherence to the I-Preventive program was 60 % . Conclusions I-Preventive is effective in the short term on musculoskeletal symptoms and visual discomfort by promoting active breaks and eyestrain treatment . This easy-to-use digital tool allows each worker to focus on areas of their choice via personalised , easy exercises that can be performed in the workplace . Trial registration number NCT02350244 ; Pre- results Abstract Purpose We conducted a systematic review to critically appraise and synthesize literature on the effectiveness of work disability prevention ( WDP ) interventions in workers with neck pain , whiplash-associated disorders ( WAD ) , or upper extremity disorders . Methods We search ed electronic data bases from 1990 to 2012 . R and om pairs of independent review ers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria . Scientifically admissible studies were summarized and synthesized following best- evidence synthesis methodology . Results Of the 6,359 articles retrieved , 16 r and omized controlled trials were eligible for critical appraisal and five were admissible . We found that a return-to-work coordination program ( including workplace-based work hardening ) was superior to clinic-based work hardening for persistent rotator cuff tendinitis . Workplace high-intensity strength training and workplace advice had similar outcomes for neck and shoulder pain . Mensendieck/Cesar postural exercises and strength and fitness exercises had similar outcomes for non-specific work-related upper limb complaints . Adding a brief job stress education program to a workplace ergonomic intervention was not beneficial for persistent upper extremity symptoms . Adding computer-prompted work breaks to ergonomic adjustments and workplace education benefited workers ’ recovery from recent work-related neck and upper extremity complaints . Conclusions At present , no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of WDP interventions for managing neck pain , WAD , and upper extremity disorders . Our review suggests a return-to-work coordination program is more effective than clinic-based work hardening . Also , adding computer-prompted breaks to ergonomic and workplace interventions benefits workers ’ recovery . The current quality of evidence does not allow for a definitive evaluation of the effectiveness of ergonomic interventions BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( MSD ) are very common in regular computer users and leading cause of work related illness . The objective of the present study is to evaluate effectiveness of yogic exercises in the improvement of symptoms of MSDs of upper limbs . MATERIAL S AND METHODS 60 study participants were r and omly divided into two groups that is yoga with counselling and only counselling group for 12 weeks . Symptom severity and functional status were assessed using the self administered Boston Carpal Tunnel Question naire and pre design ed symptom question naire before and after intervention . RESULTS There was significant reduction in symptom severity score ( P = 0.002 ) and improvement in functional status score in yoga with counselling group when compared to only counselling group . There is also a significant decrease in self reported symptoms like CT myalgia symptom ( P = 0.019 ) and improvement in weakness . CONCLUSION The present study showed a yoga based regimen is more effective than counselling alone in relieving symptoms of computer related musculoskeletal disorders OBJECTIVE Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSD ) are a leading cause of morbidity in the population , yet their prominence seems to be insufficiently appreciated . We describe the ranking compared with other major body systems of the prevalence of MSD , including arthritis and rheumatism , and back/neck disorders , as a cause of chronic health problems , longterm disability , restricted activity days , consultation with health professionals , and use of both prescription and nonprescription drugs . METHODS We analyzed data from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey , a stratified r and om sample of the household dwelling population in Ontario , based on 45,650 individuals aged 16 years and over . RESULTS MSD ranked first in prevalence as the cause of chronic health problems , longterm disabilities , and consultations with a health professional and ranked 2nd for restricted activity days and use of both prescription and nonprescription drugs . No other body systems ranked invariably within the top 2 ranks for the morbidity indices examined . Even when compared to other major disease groups , arthritis and rheumatism ranked consistently in the top 3 and back/neck disorders also ranked high . MSD were mentioned as a reason for 40 % of all chronic conditions , 54 % of all longterm disability , 24 % of restricted activity days and almost 20 % of health care utilization . The impact of MSD was even greater in the 65 and over age group . CONCLUSIONS MSD have a major role in the health profile of the population . This high burden of illness should be considered in planning health care services and setting research priorities OBJECTIVE Previously we reported that early part-time sick leave enhances return to work ( RTW ) among employees with musculoskeletal disorders ( MSD ) . This paper assesses the health-related effects of this intervention . METHODS Patients aged 18 - 60 years who were unable to perform their regular work due to MSD were r and omized to part- or full-time sick leave groups . In the former , workload was reduced by halving working time . Using vali date d question naires , we assessed pain intensity and interference with work and sleep , region-specific disability due to MSD , self-rated general health , health-related quality of life ( measured via EuroQol ) , productivity loss , depression , and sleep disturbance at baseline , 1 , 3 , 8 , 12 , and 52 weeks . We analyzed the repeated measures data ( 171 - 356 observations ) with the generalized estimating equation approach . RESULTS The intervention ( part-time sick leave ) and control ( full-time sick leave ) groups did not differ with regard to pain intensity , pain interference with work and sleep , region-specific disability , productivity loss , depression , or sleep disturbance . The intervention group reported better self-rated general health ( adjusted P=0.07 ) and health-related quality of life ( adjusted P=0.02 ) than the control group . In subgroup analyses , the intervention was more effective among the patients whose current problem began occurring < 6 weeks before baseline and those with ≤30 % productivity loss at baseline . CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that part-time sick leave did not exacerbate pain-related symptoms and functional disability , but improved self-rated general health and health-related quality of life in the early stage of work disability due to MSD OBJECTIVE Office-work poses a high-risk for musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , with consequences for workers , employers and society . The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in a sample of Iranian office workers , to investigate the association between pain severity and job satisfaction and to investigate the association between MSDs and job satisfaction . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Iranian office workers from a university setting ( n=91 ) were r and omly selected and included in this cross-sectional study . The  Nordic musculoskeletal question naire plus visual analogue scale of pain  , and the Brayfield-Rothe Job Satisfaction Index  were used to study the prevalence of MSDs , pain intensity and job satisfaction , respectively . Descriptive analysis , Pearson 's correlation , and multiple regression analysis were performed for statistical assessment . RESULTS Eighty-nine percent of participants reported musculoskeletal symptoms during the past 12 months , most commonly in the neck ( 69.2 % ) , low back ( 58.2 % ) , knees ( 41.8 % ) , shoulders ( 35.2 % ) , and upper back ( 34.1 % ) . There was a significant negative correlation between pain intensity and job satisfaction . Pain intensity , low-back pain in the last week , wrist pain in the past 12 months and shoulder pain were significantly associated with job satisfaction ( p<0.05 ) . CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that musculoskeletal symptoms are common in Iranian office workers , associated with low job satisfaction . These findings indicate the need for more attention to MSDs among office workers and design ing effective preventive interventions Background Despite considerable knowledge about musculoskeletal disorders ( MSD ) and physical , psychosocial and individual risk factors there is limited knowledge about physical activity as a factor in preventing MSD . In addition , studies of physical activity are often limited to either leisure activity or physical activity at work . Studies among military personnel on the association between physical activity at work and at leisure and MSD are lacking . This study was conducted to find the prevalence of MSD among personnel in the Royal Norwegian Navy and to assess the association between physical activity at work and at leisure and MSD . Methods A question naire about musculoskeletal disorders , physical activity and background data ( employment status , age , gender , body mass index , smoking , education and physical stressors ) was completed by 2265 workers ( 58 % ) 18 to 70 years old in the Royal Norwegian Navy .  Multiple logistic regression with 95 % confidence intervals was used to assess the relationship between physical activity and musculoskeletal disorders . Results A total of 32 % of the workers reported musculoskeletal disorders often or very often in one or more parts of the body in the past year . The most common musculoskeletal disorders were in the lower back ( 15 % often or very often ) , shoulders ( 12 % often or very often ) and neck ( 11 % often or very often ) . After adjustment for confounders , physical activity was inversely associated with musculoskeletal disorders for all body sites except elbows , knees and feet . Conclusion The one-year prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among workers in the Royal Norwegian Navy was rather low . A physically active lifestyle both at work and at leisure was associated with fewer musculoskeletal disorders  among personnel in the Royal Norwegian Navy . Prospect i ve studies are necessary to confirm the cause and effect in this association Background The importance of staying active instead of bed rest has been acknowledged in the management of musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) . This emphasizes the potential benefits of adjusting work to fit the employee 's remaining work ability . Despite part-time sick leave being an official option in many countries , its effectiveness has not been studied yet . We have design ed a r and omized controlled study to assess the health effects of early part-time sick leave compared to conventional full-day sick leave . Our hypothesis is that if work time is temporarily reduced and work load adjusted at the early stages of disability , employees with MSDs will have less disability days and faster return to regular work duties than employees on a conventional sick leave . Methods / Design The study population will consist of 600 employees , who seek medical advice from an occupational physician due to musculoskeletal pain . The inclusion requires that they have not been on a sick leave for longer than 14 days prior to the visit . Based on the physician 's judgement , the severity of the symptoms must indicate a need for conventional sick leave , but the employee is considered to be able to work part-time without any additional risk . Half of the employees are r and omly allocated to part-time sick leave group and their work time is reduced by 40–60 % , whereas in the control group work load is totally eliminated with conventional sick leave . The main outcomes are the number of days from the initial visit to return to regular work activities , and the total number of sick leave days during 12 and 24 months of follow-up . The costs and benefits as well as the feasibility of early part-time sick leave will also be evaluated . Conclusion This is the first r and omised trial to our knowledge on the effectiveness of early part-time sick leave compared to conventional full-time sick leave in the management of MSDs . The data collection continues until 2011 , but preliminary results on the feasibility of part-time sick leave will be available already in 2008 . The increased knowledge will assist in better decision making process regarding the management of disability related to MSDs . Trial Registration International St and ard R and omised Controlled Trial Number Register , register number IS RCT Objective To investigate the association of physical and psychosocial risk factors with musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in New Zeal and nurses , postal workers and office workers . Design A cross-sectional postal survey asking about demographic , physical and psychosocial factors and MSDs . Participants A total of 911 participants was r and omly selected ; nurses from the Nursing Council of New Zeal and data base ( n=280 ) , postal workers from their employer 's data base ( n=280 ) and office workers from the 2005 electoral roll ( n=351 ) . Outcome Measures Self-reported pain in the low back , neck , shoulder , elbow , wrist/h and or knee lasting more than 1 day in the month before the survey . Results The response rate was 58 % , 443 from 770 potential participants . 70 % ( n=310 ) reported at least one MSDs . Physical work tasks were associated with low back ( odds ratio ( OR ) 1.35 , 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.6 ) , shoulder ( OR 1.41 , 95 % CI 1.17 to 1.69 ) , elbow ( OR 1.14 , 95 % CI 1.13 to 1.83 ) and wrist/h and pain ( OR 1.39 , 95 % CI 1.15 to 1.69 ) . Job strain had the strongest association with neck pain ( OR 3.46 , 95 % CI 1.30 to 9.21 ) and wrist/h and pain . Somatisation was weakly associated with MSDs at most sites . Better general and mental health status were weakly associated with lower odds of MSDs . Conclusions In injury prevention and rehabilitation the physical nature of the work needs to be addressed for most MSDs , with modest decreases in risk seemingly possible . Addressing job strain could provide significant benefit for those with neck and wrist/h and pain , while the effects of somatisation and the promotion of good mental health may provide smaller but global benefits OBJECTIVE To evaluate how an intervention program modifies the clinical course of work disability in musculoskeletal diagnoses . METHODS All patients with temporary work disability related to musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in 3 health districts of Madrid , Spain were r and omized into st and ard care ( control group ) or the intervention group . Intervention consisted of a specific program , run by rheumatologists , following detailed proceedings . Inclusion and followup lasted 12 months each . According to the cause , every temporary work disability episode was classified into 11 syndrome categories . For each we calculated efficacy , as the difference between groups in the number of days on sick leave per temporary work disability episode ; relative efficacy , or the percentage of days saved in the intervention group ; and time of maximum program effect . Analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis . Survival techniques were run and results were expressed as the hazard ratio ( HR ) in the intervention versus control group . RESULTS A total of 13,077 patients were included , generating 16,297 temporary work disability episodes .  The most frequent cause was back pain . Temporary work disability episodes were significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the controls in all syndrome categories except knee pain ( excluding osteoarthritis ) . Program relative efficacy varied from 28 - 72 % . The program was highly efficacious in carpal tunnel syndrome ( HR 2.09 , 95 % confidence interval [ 95 % CI ] 1.17 - 3.75 ) , peripheral osteoarthritis ( HR 1.58 , 95 % CI 1.14 - 2.19 ) , and inflammatory diseases ( HR 1.52 , 95 % CI 1.09 - 2.12 ) . The maximum effect of the program always took place within the first 2 months . CONCLUSION The implementation of this type of specialist-run , protocol -based early intervention program would be very beneficial in the treatment of patients with work disability related to MSDs , except for those with knee pain ( excluding osteoarthritis ) Introduction In Denmark , the magnitude and impact of work disability on the individual worker and society has prompted the development of a new “ coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation ” ( CTWR ) approach . The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CTWR with conventional case management ( CCM ) on return-to-work of workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) . Methods The study was a r and omized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave for 4–12 weeks due to MSDs . CTWR consists of a work disability screening by an interdisciplinary team followed by the collaborative development of a RTW plan . The primary outcome variable was registered cumulative sickness absence hours during 12 months follow-up . Secondary outcomes were work status as well as pain intensity and functional disability , measured at baseline , 3 and 12 months follow-up . The economic evaluation ( intervention costs , productivity loss , and health care utilization costs ) was based on administrative data derived from national registries . Results For the time intervals 0–6 months , 6–12 months , and the entire follow-up period , the number of sickness absence hours was significantly lower in the CTWR group as compared to the control group . The total costs saved in CTWR participants compared to controls were estimated at US $ 1,366 per person at 6 months follow-up and US $ 10,666 per person at 12 months follow-up . Conclusions Workers on sick leave for 4–12 weeks due to MSD who underwent “ CTWR ” by an interdisciplinary team had fewer sickness absence hours than controls . The economic evaluation showed that — in terms of productivity loss — CTWR seems to be cost saving for the society BACKGROUND Occupational health guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach to manage  sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , with a primary focus on early intervention through provision of a supportive network . AIMS To investigate the implementation of a guidelines -based intervention ( early contact of absentees ; addressing psychosocial obstacles ; offering temporary modified work ; communicating among the players ) , and to determine whether this is effective for reducing return-to-work times and duration of future absence . METHODS A non-r and omized controlled trial was conducted within a UK company . Occupational health nurses at two experimental sites ( 1,435 workers ) were trained to deliver the intervention to workers taking absence due to MSDs ( low back and upper limb disorders ) , while usual care was delivered at three control sites ( 1,483 workers ) .  Company-recorded absence data were collected over a 12-month follow-up period . RESULTS The implementation of the experimental intervention was impeded by unforeseen organizational obstacles at one site ( policies , procedures and individual approaches ) which had a detrimental effect on uptake and delivery . At the site where the intervention was delivered per protocol , absence was significantly less compared with controls ; 6.5 and 10.8 days , respectively . However , the duration of future absence was not significantly different ( 13.0 and 25.1 days , respectively ) . CONCLUSIONS An early intervention addressing psychosocial obstacles to recovery can be effective for reducing absence due to MSDs . Successful implementation , where the key players are onside and organizational obstacles are overcome , is difficult to achieve BACKGROUND A prospect i ve study of computer users was performed to determine the occurrence of and evaluate risk factors for  neck or shoulder ( N/S ) and h and or arm ( H/A ) musculoskeletal symptoms ( MSS ) and disorders ( MSD ) . METHODS Individuals ( n = 632 ) newly hired into jobs requiring > or = 15 hr/week of computer use were followed for up to 3 years . At study entry , workstation dimensions and worker postures were measured and medical and psychosocial risk factors were assessed . Daily diaries were used to document work practice s and incident MSS . Those reporting MSS were examined for specific MSD . Incidence rates of MSS and MSD were estimated with survival analysis . Cox regression models were used to evaluate associations between participant characteristics at entry and MSS and MSD . RESULTS The annual incidence of N/S MSS was 58 cases/100 person-years and of N/S MSD was 35 cases/100 person-years . The most common N/S MSD was somatic pain syndrome . The annual incidence of H/A MSS was 39 cases/100 person-years and of H/A MSD was 21 cases/100 person-years . The most common H/A disorder was deQuervain 's tendonitis . Forty-six percent of N/S and 32 % of H/A MSS occurred during the first month of follow-up . Gender , age , ethnicity , and prior history of N/S pain were associated with N/S MSS and MSD . Gender , prior history of H/A pain , prior computer use , and children at home were associated with either H/A MSS or MSD . CONCLUSIONS H/A and N/S MSS and MSD were common among computer users . More than 50 % of computer users reported MSS during the first year after starting a new job OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an ergonomic intervention on pain and sickness absence caused by upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders . METHODS In this r and omized controlled study , subjects aged 18 - 60 years ( N=177 ) seeking medical advice due to upper-extremity symptoms were included if their symptoms , or the exacerbation of symptoms , had started < 30 days prior to the medical consultation and immediate sick leave was not required .  Workplace ergonomic improvements were made in the intervention group . Data on symptoms and sickness absences were gathered during one-year follow-up . RESULTS Pain intensity , pain interference with work , leisure time , or sleep did not differ between the intervention and control group during the one-year follow-up . During the first three months of follow-up , the percentage of employees with sickness absence due to upper-extremity or other musculoskeletal disorders did not differ between the intervention ( N=89 ) and control ( N=84 ) group , but the total number of sickness absence days in the intervention group was about half of that in the control group ( mean 6.2 versus 9.8 days for upper-extremity disorder and 6.0 versus 11.5 days for upper-extremity and other musculoskeletal disorders combined ) . During 4 - 12 months of follow-up , the percentage of employees with sickness absence due to upper-extremity disorder ( 10.1 % versus 16.7 % , P=0.20 ) or upper-extremity and other musculoskeletal disorders combined ( 20.2 % versus 32.1 % , P=0.07 ) was lower in the intervention than the control group . CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that an early ergonomic intervention reduces sickness absence due to upper-extremity or other musculoskeletal disorders Background Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are a major reason for impaired work productivity and sick leave . In 2009 , a national rehabilitation program was introduced in Sweden to promote work ability , and patients with MSDs were offered multimodal rehabilitation . The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of this program on health related quality of life , function , sick leave and work ability . Methods We conducted a prospect i ve , observational cohort study including 406 patients with MSDs attending multimodal rehabilitation .  Changes over time and differences between groups were analysed concerning function , health related quality of life , work ability and sick leave . Regression analyses were used to study the outcome variables health related quality of life ( measured with EQ-5D ) , and sick leave . Results Functional ability and health related quality of life improved after rehabilitation . Patients with no sick leave/disability pension the year before rehabilitation , improved health related quality of life more than patients with sick leave/disability pension the year before rehabilitation ( p = 0.044 ) . During a period of −/+ four months from rehabilitation start , patients with EQ-5D ≥ 0.5 at rehabilitation start , reduced their net sick leave days with 0.5 days and patients with EQ-5D < 0.5 at rehabilitation start , increased net sick leave days with 1.5 days ( p = 0.019 ) . Factors negatively associated with sick leave at follow-up were earlier episodes of sick leave/disability pension , problems with exercise tolerance functions and mobility after rehabilitation . Higher age was associated with not being on sick leave at follow-up and reaching an EQ-5D ≥ 0.5 at follow-up . Severe pain after rehabilitation , problems with exercise tolerance functions , born outside of Sweden and full-time sick leave/disability pension the year before rehabilitation were all associated with an EQ-5D level < 0.5 at follow-up . Conclusions Patients with MSDs participating in a national work promoting rehabilitation program  significantly improved their health related quality of life and functional ability , especially those with no sick leave . This shows that vocational rehabilitation programs in a primary health care setting are effective . The findings of this study can also be valuable for more appropriate patient selection for rehabilitation programs for MSDs
There was strong evidence for one intervention category , resistance training , leading to the recommendation : Implementing a workplace-based resistance training exercise programme can help prevent and manage UEMSD and symptoms .
The synthesis also revealed moderate evidence for stretching programmes , mouse use feedback and forearm supports in preventing UEMSD or symptoms .
There was also moderate evidence for no benefit for EMG biofeedback , job stress management training , and office workstation adjustment for UEMSD and symptoms .
The burden of disabling musculoskeletal pain and injuries ( musculoskeletal disorders , MSDs ) arising from work-related causes in many workplaces remains substantial .
There is little consensus on the most appropriate interventions for MSDs .
Our objective was to up date a systematic review of workplace-based interventions for preventing and managing  upper extremity MSD ( UEMSD ) .