Determinants of weight loss maintenance: a systematic review. Dietetic guidelines: diet in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Comparative Effectiveness of Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Mixed Treatment Comparison Are interventions effective in improving the ability of older adults to rise from the floor independently? A mixed method systematic review INVITED COMMENTARY: Rating the Quality of Trials in Systematic Reviews of Physical Therapy Interventions Creation of a database to assess effects of omega-3, omega-6 and total polyunsaturated fats on health: methodology for a set of systematic reviews Community pharmacy interventions for public health priorities: protocol for a systematic review of community pharmacy-delivered smoking, alcohol and weight management interventions Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Principal findings of systematic reviews of acute asthma treatment in childhood Mineral Trioxide Aggregate vs. Calcium Hydroxide in Primary Molar Pulpotomy: A Systematic Review A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on curative and health enhancement effects of forest therapy Antimicrobially impregnated catheters: An overview of randomized controlled trials. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach Physical Activity/Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes Effects of workplace-based dietary and/or physical activity interventions for weight management targeting healthcare professionals: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials A systematic review of anxiety interventions in stroke and acquired brain injury: Efficacy and trial design Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency. Examining the theory‐effectiveness hypothesis: A systematic review of systematic reviews Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in depression in adults: a systematic review protocol Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?
BACKGROUND Discerning the determinants of weight loss maintenance is important in the planning of future interventions and policies regarding overweight and obesity . We have therefore systematic ally synthesized recent literature on determinants of weight loss maintenance for individuals with overweight and obesity . METHODS With the use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses statement , prospect i ve studies were identified from search es in PubMed and PsycINFO from 2006 to 2016 . We included articles investigating adults with overweight and obesity undergoing weight loss without surgery or medication .  Included articles were scored on their method ological quality , and a best- evidence synthesis was applied to summarize the results . RESULTS Our search result ed in 8,222 articles of which 67 articles were selected . In total , 124 determinants were identified of which 5 were demographic , 59 were behavioural , 51 were psychological/cognitive and 9 were social and physical environmental determinants . We found consistent evidence that demographic determinants were not predictive of weight loss maintenance . Behavioural and cognitive determinants that promote a reduction in energy intake , an increase in energy expenditure and monitoring of this balance are predictive determinants . CONCLUSION This review identifies key determinants in weight loss maintenance . However , more research regarding cognitive and environmental determinants of weight loss maintenance is needed to advance our knowledge on determinants of weight loss maintenance AIM To produce dietetic guidelines summarizing the systematic review evidence on dietary advice for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease . METHODS The Cochrane Library , MEDLINE and EMBASE were comprehensively search ed for systematic review s on aspects of diet and heart health . Review s were included if they search ed systematic ally for r and omised controlled trials relating to diet and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease . Two members of the UK Heart Health and Thoracic Dietitians Group critically appraised each review . The quality and results of each review were discussed and summarized in a whole group meeting . The guidelines were trialled in seven dietetic departments and modified where necessary . RESULTS Providing evidence -based dietary information ( including increasing omega-3 fat plus fruit and vegetable intake ) to all people after myocardial infa rct ion will save more lives than concentrating dietary advice on those in need of weight loss or lipid lowering . The practice of prioritizing dietetic time to those with raised lipids is out of date since the advent of statin therapy . CONCLUSION There is good systematic review evidence that dietary advice to those with cardiovascular disease can reduce mortality and morbidity as well as modify risk factors .  Dietary advice that does this most effectively should be prioritized Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 ( DPP-4 ) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control . Design Systematic review of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) , health economic evaluation studies , systematic review s , and meta-analyses , followed by primary Bayesian mixed treatment comparison meta-analyses ( MTCs ) , and secondary frequentist direct-comparison meta-analyses using a r and om-effects model . Outcomes were reported as weighted mean change from baseline , or odds ratio ( OR ) with 95 % credible interval . Data sources MEDLINE , MEDLINE In-Process , EMBASE , and BIOSIS via Dialog ProQuest ; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Data base of Systematic Review s via EBSCO ; four diabetes and two technical congress abstract s ; and health technology assessment organization websites . Eligibility criteria Patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control receiving any pharmacological anti-diabetic treatment . Data extraction and analysis Title/ abstract s were review ed for eligibility , followed by full-text review of publications remaining after first pass . A three-person team filtered articles and an independent review er checked a r and om selection ( 10 % ) of filtered articles . Data extraction and quality assessment of studies were also independently review ed . Five DPP-4 inhibitors ( alogliptin , linagliptin , saxagliptin , sitagliptin , and vildagliptin ) were compared via meta- analysis ( where data were available ) as monotherapy , dual therapy ( plus metformin , sulfonylurea , pioglitazone , or insulin ) , and triple therapy ( plus metformin/sulfonylurea ) . Results The review identified 6,601 articles ; 163 met inclusion criteria and 85 publications from 83 RCTs contained sufficient or appropriate data for analysis . MTCs demonstrated no differences between DPP-4 inhibitors in mean change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) or body weight , or the proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7 % or experiencing a hypoglycemic event , apart from in patients on alogliptin plus metformin , who achieved HbA1c < 7 % more frequently than those treated with saxagliptin plus metformin [ OR 6.41 ( 95 % CI 3.15–11.98 ) versus 2.17 ( 95 % CI 1.56–2.95 ) ] . Conclusions This systematic review and MTC showed similar efficacy and safety for DPP-4 inhibitors as treatment for type 2 diabetes , either as monotherapy or combination therapy Abstract Purpose : To review available evidence on older people ’s ability to get up off the floor independently and determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve older adults ’ ability to rise from the floor . Material s and methods : Seven data bases were search ed between January 1975 and June 2018 . Eligibility criteria included : people aged ≥60 ; interventions to improve strength/function including ability to get up off the floor  ( for intervention studies ) ; comparison groups ( for r and omized and nonr and omized controlled trials ) ; outcome : quantitative or qualitative evaluation of ability to get up off the floor . Selection of the studies was undertaken in three stages : ( 1 ) titles and abstract s were scanned by one review er , ( 2 ) full abstract screening by one review er , and ( 3 ) articles read in full by two review ers . Results of all articles are summarized and r and omized controlled trials ( RCT ) ( where possible ) were analyzed by meta- analysis to determine intervention effectiveness . Results : Forty-one studies met inclusion criteria . For each of the RCTs that utilized resistance training and /or teaching the skill , a reduction in time to get up off the floor were reported . However , meta-analyses of all RCT interventions indicated no significant change in time for older people to get up off the floor independently with intervention ( MD : –0.43[–1.38 , 0.51 ] ) . Sub-analyses of interventions utilizing resistance training showed an improvement trending towards significance ( MD : –0.81[–1.72 , 0.09 ] ) . Heterogeneity between studies was high , therefore results should be viewed with some caution . Conclusions : Resistance training interventions may improve  older people ’s ability to rise from the floor unassisted . However , knowledge of specific techniques to get up and the effect of simply practicing the task of getting off the floor need to be further explored . Implication for rehabilitation One in three older people living in the community fall each year One aspect of falling that is often overlooked is whether the older person can get themselves up off the floor independently or do they have to wait for assistance . Interventions that include resistance training may help the older person to be able to get up by themselves & NA ; Physical therapists seeking to use evidence to guide their practice may have limited time to read research reports . One way to reduce the time required to identify and read about the research that is relevant to a particular clinical question is to read a systematic review that summarizes multiple studies . This paper explains the process that is used to conduct systematic review s , which includes the establishment of a protocol , comprehensive search ing , appraisal of the quality of the included studies , data extraction and meta analysis , and consideration of the clinical and research implication s of the findings . We also consider how the reader of a systematic review can determine whether the review is likely to provide an unbiased ( believable ) estimate of the treatment effect . A systematic review of r and omized trials of a  cardiopulmonary physical therapy intervention is used as an example . The issue of appraisal of quality is then discussed further , with a demonstration of how one vali date d tool for quality appraisal ‐‐the PEDro scale‐‐can be used to evaluate a r and omized trial in cardiopulmonary physical therapy Objective To create a data base of long-term r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) comparing higher with lower omega-3 , omega-6 or total polyunsaturated fatty acid ( PUFA ) , regardless of reported outcomes , and to develop methods to assess effects of increasing omega-6 , alpha-linolenic acid ( ALA ) , long-chain omega-3 ( LCn3 ) and total PUFA on health outcomes . Design Systematic review search , methodology and meta-analyses . Data sources Medline , Embase , CENTRAL , WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform , Clinical trials.gov and trials in relevant systematic review s. Eligibility criteria RCTs of ≥24 weeks ' duration assessing effects of increasing ALA , LCn3 , omega-6 or total PUFAs , regardless of outcomes reported . Data synthesis Methods included r and om-effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses . Funnel plots were examined , and subgrouping assessed effects of intervention type , replacement , baseline diabetes risk and use of diabetic medications , trial duration and dose . Quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment , Development and Evaluation ( GRADE ) . Results Electronic search es generated 37 810 hits , de-duplicated to 19 772 titles and abstract s. We assessed 2155 full-text papers , conference abstract s and trials registry entries independently in duplicate . Included studies were grouped into 363 RCTs comparing higher with lower omega-3 , omega-6 and /or total PUFA intake of at least 6 months ’ duration —the Data base . Of these 363 included RCTs , 216 RCTs were included in at least one of our review s of health outcomes , data extracted and risk of bias assessed in duplicate . Ninety five RCTs were included in the Data base but not included in our current review s. Of these 311 completed trials , 27 altered ALA intake , 221 altered LCn3 intake and 16 trials altered omega-3 intake without specifying whether ALA or LCn3 . Forty one trials altered omega-6 and 59 total PUFA.The remaining 52 trials are ongoing though 13 ( 25 % ) appear to be outst and ing , or constitute missing data . Conclusions This extensive data base of trials is available to allow assessment of further health outcomes Background Community pharmacists can deliver health care advice at an opportunistic level , related to prescription or non-prescription medicines and as part of focused services design ed to reduce specific risks to health . Obesity , smoking and excessive alcohol intake are three of the most significant modifiable risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the UK , and interventions led by community pharmacists , aim ed at these three risk factors , have been identified by the government as public health priorities . In 2008 , the Department of Health for Engl and stated that ‘ a sound evidence base that demonstrates how pharmacy delivers effective , high quality and value for money services is needed ’ ; this systematic review aims to respond to this requirement . Methods / design We will search the data bases MEDLINE , Embase , CINAHL , PsycINFO , Social Sciences Citation Index , ASSIA , IBSS , Sociological Abstract s , Scopus and NHS Economic Evaluation Data base for studies that have evaluated interventions based on community pharmacies that aim to target weight management , smoking cessation and alcohol misuse . We will include all r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) , non-r and omised controlled trials ( N RCTs ) , controlled before-after studies ( CBAs ) and interrupted time series ( ITS ) and repeated measures studies . Data from included studies will be extracted by two independent review ers and will include study details methods , results , intervention implementation/costs and method ological quality . Meta- analysis will be conducted if appropriate ; if not , the synthesis will be restricted to a narrative overview of individual studies looking at the same question . Discussion The review aims to summarise the evidence base on the effectiveness of community pharmacy interventions on health and health behaviours in relation to weight management , smoking cessation and alcohol misuse . It will also explore if , and how , socio-economic status , gender , ethnicity and age moderate the effect of the interventions and will describe how the interventions included in the review have been organised , implemented and delivered , since context is an important factor governing the success of public health interventions . The findings from this review will have an impact on the commissioning of public health services aim ing to promote healthy weight , smoking cessation and prevent excessive alcohol consumption . Systematic review registration The review has been registered with PROSPERO ( registration no. CRD42013005943 ) . Available at : http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/ prospero /display_record.asp?ID = CRD42013005943 BACKGROUND Systematic review s may be compromised by selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses . Selective inclusion occurs when there are multiple effect estimates in a trial report that could be included in a particular meta- analysis ( e.g. from multiple measurement scales and time points ) and the choice of effect estimate to include in the meta- analysis is based on the results ( e.g. statistical significance , magnitude or direction of effect ) . Selective reporting occurs when the reporting of a subset of outcomes and analyses in the systematic review is based on the results ( e.g. a protocol -defined outcome is omitted from the published systematic review ) . OBJECTIVES To summarise the characteristics and synthesis e the results of empirical studies that have investigated the prevalence of selective inclusion or reporting in systematic review s of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) , investigated the factors ( e.g. statistical significance or direction of effect ) associated with the prevalence and quantified the bias . SEARCH METHODS We search ed the Cochrane Methodology Register ( to July 2012 ) , Ovid MEDLINE , Ovid EMBASE , Ovid PsycINFO and ISI Web of Science ( each up to May 2013 ) , and the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( AHRQ ) Effective Healthcare Program 's Scientific Re source Center ( SRC ) Methods Library ( to June 2013 ) . We also search ed the abstract books of the 2011 and 2012 Cochrane Colloquia and the article alerts for method ological work in research synthesis published from 2009 to 2011 and compiled in Research Synthesis Methods . SELECTION CRITERIA We included both published and unpublished empirical studies that investigated the prevalence and factors associated with selective inclusion or reporting , or both , in systematic review s of RCTs of healthcare interventions . We included empirical studies assessing any type of selective inclusion or reporting , such as investigations of how frequently RCT outcome data is selectively included in systematic review s based on the results , outcomes and analyses are discrepant between protocol and published review or non-significant outcomes are partially reported in the full text or summary within systematic review s. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected empirical studies for inclusion , extracted the data and performed a risk of bias assessment . A third review author resolved any disagreements about inclusion or exclusion of empirical studies , data extraction and risk of bias . We contacted authors of included studies for additional unpublished data . Primary outcomes included overall prevalence of selective inclusion or reporting , association between selective inclusion or reporting and the statistical significance of the effect estimate , and association between selective inclusion or reporting and the direction of the effect estimate . We combined prevalence estimates and risk ratios ( RRs ) using a r and om-effects meta- analysis model . MAIN RESULTS Seven studies met the inclusion criteria . No studies had investigated selective inclusion of results in systematic review s , or discrepancies in outcomes and analyses between systematic review registry entries and published systematic review s. Based on a meta- analysis of four studies ( including 485 Cochrane Review s ) , 38 % ( 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 23 % to 54 % ) of systematic review s added , omitted , up grade d or down grade d at least one outcome between the protocol and published systematic review . The association between statistical significance and discrepant outcome reporting between protocol and published systematic review was uncertain . The meta-analytic estimate suggested an increased risk of adding or upgrading ( i.e. changing a secondary outcome to primary ) when the outcome was statistically significant , although the 95 % CI included no association and a decreased risk as plausible estimates ( RR 1.43 , 95 % CI 0.71 to 2.85 ; two studies , n = 552 meta-analyses ) . Also , the meta-analytic estimate suggested an increased risk of downgrading ( i.e. changing a primary outcome to secondary ) when the outcome was statistically significant , although the 95 % CI included no association and a decreased risk as plausible estimates ( RR 1.26 , 95 % CI 0.60 to 2.62 ; two studies , n = 484 meta-analyses ) . None of the included studies had investigated whether the association between statistical significance and adding , upgrading or downgrading of outcomes was modified by the type of comparison , direction of effect or type of outcome ; or whether there is an association between direction of the effect estimate and discrepant outcome reporting . Several secondary outcomes were reported in the included studies . Two studies found that reasons for discrepant outcome reporting were infrequently reported in published systematic review s ( 6 % in one study and 22 % in the other ) . One study ( including 62 Cochrane Review s ) found that 32 % ( 95 % CI 21 % to 45 % ) of systematic review s did not report all primary outcomes in the abstract . Another study ( including 64 Cochrane and 118 non-Cochrane review s ) found that statistically significant primary outcomes were more likely to be completely reported in the systematic review abstract than non-significant primary outcomes ( RR 2.66 , 95 % CI 1.81 to 3.90 ) . None of the studies included systematic review s published after 2009 when reporting st and ards for systematic review s ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review s and Meta-Analyses ( PRISMA ) Statement , and Method ological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Review s ( MECIR ) ) were disseminated , so the results might not be generalisable to more recent systematic review s. AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Discrepant outcome reporting between the protocol and published systematic review is fairly common , although the association between statistical significance and discrepant outcome reporting is uncertain . Complete reporting of outcomes in systematic review abstract s is associated with statistical significance of the results for those outcomes . Systematic review outcomes and analysis plans should be specified prior to seeing the results of included studies to minimise post-hoc decisions that may be based on the observed results . Modifications that occur once the review has commenced , along with their justification , should be clearly reported . Effect estimates and CIs should be reported for all systematic review outcomes regardless of the results . The lack of research on selective inclusion of results in systematic review s needs to be addressed and studies that avoid the method ological weaknesses of existing research are also needed Abstract Objective : The objective of this study is to summarize the principal findings in the literature about acute asthma management in children . Methods : Systematic review s of r and omized clinical trials ( S RCTs ) with or without meta- analysis in children ( 1–18 years ) admitted to the emergency department ( ED ) were retrieved using five data bases . Method ological quality was determined using the AMSTAR tool . Results : One hundred and three studies were retrieved . Among those , 28 S RCTs were included : seven S RCTs related to short-acting beta2-agonists ( SABA ) , three to ipratropium bromide ( IB ) , eight to corticosteroids , one to racemic adrenaline , one to leukotriene receptor antagonists ( LTRA ) , four to magnesium sulfate , one to intravenous ( IV ) SABA , one to IV aminophylline , one to IV ketamine , and one to antibiotics . It was determined that administering SABA by MDI-VHC is superior to using a nebulizer , because it decreases the hospital admission rate , improves the clinical score , results in a shorter time in the ED , and causes fewer adverse effects .  Levalbuterol and albuterol were similar . In patients with moderate to severe exacerbations , IB+SABA was superior to SABA , decreasing hospital admission and improving the clinical score .  SABA heliox administered by nebulizer decreased exacerbation severity compared to oxygen . Inhaled corticosteroids ( ICS ) , especially administered by nebulizer , showed results similar to oral corticosteroids ( OCS ) with respect to reducing hospital admission , unscheduled visits , and the requirement of additional systemic corticosteroids . ICS or OCS following ED discharge was similar with regard to relapse . Compared with a placebo , IV magnesium reduced hospital admission and improved lung function . Conclusions : S RCTs are useful for guiding decisions in acute asthma treatment Introduction : The aim of this quantitative systematic review /meta- analysis was to compare the treatment outcomes of mineral trioxide aggregate ( MTA ) and calcium hydroxide ( CH ) in pulpotomy of human primary molars . The focused PICO question was “ in case of pulp exposure in vital primary molars , how does MTA pulpotomy compare to CH in terms of clinical /radiographic success ? ” Methods and Material s : We retrieved published r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) of at least 6-month duration ; our search included articles published up to March 2013 in five following data bases : PubMed ( Medline ) , Cochrane data base of systematic review s , Science Citation Index , EMBASE , and Google Scholar . Mantel Haenszel and Inverse Variance-weighted methods were applied by STATA ; the relative risk ( RR ) was calculated with 95 % confidence intervals ( CI ) . Results : A total of 282 English articles were collected . Two authors independently screened the articles and five RCTs were selected ; data extraction and quality assessment were then carried out . Four RCTs were appropriate for meta- analysis according to their follow-up times by Mantel Haenszel method . Statistically significant difference was found between success rate of MTA compared to CH , with RR=0.08 ( 95 % CI , 0.02 - 0.39 ) , RR=0.19 ( 95 % CI , 0.08 - 0.46 ) , and RR=0.38 ( 95 % CI , 0.21 - 0.68 ) for 6- , 12- , and 24-month follow-ups , respectively . A significant difference was also observed for all included RCTs after analyses using the Inverse Variance-weighted method ( RR=0.44 ; 95 % CI , 0.27 - 0.72 ) . Conclusions : Systematic review /meta- analysis of included RCTs revealed that for pulpotomy of vital primary molars , MTA has better treatment outcomes compared to CH Objective To summarize the evidence for curative and health enhancement effects through  forest therapy  and to assess the quality of studies based on a review of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) . Study design A systematic review based on RCTs . Methods Studies were eligible if they were RCTs . Studies included one treatment group in which forest therapy was applied .  The following data bases – from 1990 to November 9 , 2010 – were search ed : MEDLINE via PubMed , CINAHL , Web of Science , and Ichushi- Web . All Cochrane data bases and Campbell Systematic Review s were also search ed up to November 9 , 2010 . Results Two trials met all inclusion criteria . No specific diseases were evaluated , and both studies reported significant effectiveness in one or more outcomes for health enhancement . However , the results of evaluations with the CONSORT ( Consoli date d St and ards of Reporting Trials ) 2010 and CLEAR NPT ( A Checklist to Evaluate a Report of a Nonpharmacological Trial ) checklists generally showed a remarkable lack of description in the studies . Furthermore , there was a problem of heterogeneity , thus a meta- analysis was unable to be performed . Conclusion Because there was insufficient evidence on forest therapy due to poor method ological and reporting quality and heterogeneity of RCTs , it was not possible to offer any conclusions about the effects of this intervention . However , it was possible to identify problems with current RCTs of forest therapy , and to propose a strategy for strengthening study quality and stressing the importance of study feasibility and original check items based on characteristics of forest therapy as a future research agenda In order to acquire an overview of the effectiveness of  antimicrobially impregnated catheters  on the prevention of  catheter related bloodstream infections ( CRI )  , we conducted a systematic review concentrating on r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) . The analysis end point was CRI ; therefore , studies focussing only on catheter colonization were excluded . We did not consider abstract s for analysis . We identified 24 RCTs investigating the effectiveness of  antimicrobially impregnated catheters .  In addition , we discovered five meta-analyses and four studies investigating cost effectiveness . For the majority of antimicrobially impregnated catheter types only a few studies were available , and not enough to draw conclusions . Therefore , despite a relatively large number of RCTs available , the routine use of antimicrobially impregnated catheters as a measure for CRI prevention remains controversial , with a need for more high quality studies Aims : With the increase in the number of systematic review s available , a logical next step to provide decision makers in healthcare with the evidence they require has been the conduct of review s of existing systematic review s. Syntheses of existing systematic review s are referred to by many different names , one of which is an umbrella review . An umbrella review allows the findings of review s relevant to a review question to be compared and contrasted . An umbrella review 's most characteristic feature is that this type of evidence synthesis only considers for inclusion the highest level of evidence , namely other systematic review s and meta-analyses . A methodology working group was formed by the Joanna Briggs Institute to develop method ological guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review , including diverse types of evidence , both quantitative and qualitative . The aim of this study is to describe the development and guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review . Methods : Discussion and testing of the elements of methods for the conduct of an umbrella review were held over a 6-month period by members of a methodology working group . The working group comprised six participants who corresponded via teleconference , e-mail and face-to-face meeting during this development period . In October 2013 , the methodology was presented in a workshop at the Joanna Briggs Institute Convention . Workshop participants , review authors and method ologists provided further testing , critique and feedback on the proposed methodology . Results : This study describes the methodology and methods developed for the conduct of an umbrella review that includes published systematic review s and meta-analyses as the analytical unit of the review . Details are provided regarding the essential elements of an umbrella review , including presentation of the review question in a Population , Intervention , Comparator , Outcome format , nuances of the inclusion criteria and search strategy . A critical appraisal tool with 10 questions to help assess risk of bias in systematic review s and meta-analyses was also developed and tested . Relevant details to extract from included review s and how to best present the findings of both quantitative and qualitative systematic review s in a reader friendly format are provided . Conclusions : Umbrella review s provide a ready means for decision makers in healthcare to gain a clear underst and ing of a broad topic area . The umbrella review methodology described here is the first to consider review s that report other than quantitative evidence derived from r and omized controlled trials . The methodology includes an easy to use and informative summary of evidence table to readily provide decision makers with the available , highest level of evidence relevant to the question posed For decades , exercise has been considered a cornerstone of diabetes management , along with diet and medication . However , high- quality evidence on the importance of exercise and fitness in diabetes was lacking until recent years . The present document summarizes the most clinical ly relevant recent advances related to people with type 2 diabetes and the recommendations that follow from these . Our recently published technical review on physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes ( 1 ) includes greater detail on individual studies , on prevention of diabetes , and on the physiology of exercise . The present statement focuses on type 2 diabetes . Issues primarily germane to type 1 diabetes will be covered in a subsequent technical review and ADA Statement . The levels of evidence used are defined by the ADA in ref . 2 . Two r and omized trials each found that lifestyle interventions including ∼150 min/week of physical activity and  diet-induced weight loss of 5–7 % reduced the risk of progression from impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) to type 2 diabetes by 58 % ( 3,4 ) . A cluster-r and omized trial found that diet alone , exercise alone , and combined diet and exercise were equally effective in reducting the progression from IGT to diabetes ( 5 ) . Therefore , there is firm and consistent evidence that programs of increased physical activity  and modest weight loss reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in individuals with IGT . Boule et al. ( 6 ) undertook a systematic review and meta- analysis on the effects of structured exercise interventions in clinical trials of ≥8 weeks duration on HbA1c ( A1C ) and body mass in people with type 2 diabetes . Postintervention A1C was significantly lower in exercise than control groups ( 7.65 vs. 8.31 % , weighted mean difference −0.66 % ; P < 0.001 ) . In contrast , postintervention body weight did not differ between the exercise and control groups . Meta-regression confirmed that the beneficial effect of exercise on A1C Background The prevalence of overweight and obesity is high amongst healthcare professionals and there is growing interest in delivering weight loss interventions in the workplace . We conducted a systematic review to ( i ) examine the effectiveness of workplace-based diet and /or physical activity interventions aim ed at healthcare professionals and to ( ii ) identify and describe key components of effective interventions . Seven electronic data bases were systematic ally search ed . Results Thirteen r and omised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria , of which seven had data available for meta- analysis . Where meta- analysis was possible , studies were grouped according to length of follow-up ( < 12 months and ≥12 months ) and behavioural target ( diet only , physical activity only or diet and physical activity ) , with outcome data pooled using a weighted r and om effects model . Nine studies reported statistically significant ( between-group ) differences . Four studies reported being informed by a behaviour change theory . Meta- analysis of all trials reporting weight data demonstrated healthcare professionals allocated to dietary and physical activity interventions lost significantly more body weight ( −3.95 Kg , [ 95 % CI −4.96 to- 2.95 Kg ] ) than controls up to 12 months follow up . Conclusions Workplace diet and /or physical activity interventions targeting healthcare professionals are limited in number and are heterogeneous . To improve the evidence base , we recommend additional evaluations of theory-based interventions and adequate reporting of intervention content Objective There is little r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) evidence to guide treatment for anxiety after stroke . We systematic ally review ed RCTs of anxiety interventions in acquired brain injury ( ABI ) conditions including stroke and traumatic brain injury ( TBI ) in order to summarize efficacy and key aspects of trial design to help guide future RCTs . Methods We search ed the Cochrane trial register , Medline , Embase , PsychInfo and CINAHL systematic ally up to August 2017 . Two independent review ers systematic ally selected studies and extracted data . We summarized the effect size , key study characteristics and sources of potential bias in trial design . Results 14 studies ( 12 stroke ; one stroke & TBI ; one TBI ) with 928 participants were included . Meta- analysis of five psychotherapy comparisons favoured intervention over control ( st and ardized mean difference ( SMD ) : − 0.41 [ − 0.79 , − 0.03 ] , I2 = 28 % ) ; Overall effect size of pharmacotherapy comparisons favoured intervention over control ( SMD : − 2.12 [ − 3.05 , − 1.18 ] , I2 = 89 % ) . One comparison of mixed pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy favoured intervention over usual care ( SMD : − 4.79 [ − 5.87 , − 3.71 ] ) . One comparison favoured  forest therapy versus urban control ( SMD : − 2.00 [ − 2.59 , − 1.41 ] ) . All positive studies carried high or unclear risk of bias . Sample sizes were small in all included studies . Conclusions There is low quality evidence to suggest that psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy may be effective interventions in the treatment of anxiety after stroke based on underpowered studies that carried high risk of bias . Large-scale well- design ed definitive trials are needed to establish whether pharmacological or psychotherapy works . Our review highlighted key considerations for investigators wishing to design high quality trials to evaluate treatments for anxiety after stroke OBJECTIVES To propose methods for mixed treatment comparisons ( MTC ) based on pooled summaries of the type produced in overviews of review s. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Overviews of review s ( umbrella review s ) summarize the results of multiple systematic review s into a single document . They report the summary estimates from the original pairwise meta-analyses and discuss them in narrative form , with the intention of identifying the most effective treatment . We present methods for MTC synthesis , tailored for use with overviews of review s. These generate a single internally consistent summary of all the relative treatment effects and assessment s of whether the summary is consistent with the data . These methods are applied to a published overview of treatments for childhood nocturnal enuresis . We apply the methods to both fixed-effect ( FE ) and r and om-effects ( RE ) meta-analyses of the original trials . RESULTS The summary relative risks based on FE meta-analyses , as originally published , were highly inconsistent . Those based on RE meta-analyses were consistent and could , given st and ard assumptions on comparability of treatment effects in meta- analysis , form a basis for coherent decision making . CONCLUSION Along with the summaries from systematic review s , MTC methods should be used in overviews to provide a single coherent analysis of all treatment comparisons and to check for evidence consistency PURPOSE Health interventions based on theory may be more effective than those that are not . This review of review s synthesizes all published r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) meta-analytic evidence from the last decade to examine whether theory-based interventions were found to be associated with more effective  adult health behaviour change interventions . METHODS Systematic review s including meta-analyses were identified by search ing Medline , CINAHL , PsycINFO , and CDSR . A narrative synthesis was used to summarize and analyse the evidence . Only review s including RCTs of health behaviour change interventions with adults aged 18 + published from 2007 to 2017 were included . RESULTS Of 8,659 articles , nine systematic review s met inclusion criteria . The majority of review s ( n = 8) suggested no increased effectiveness for theory-based compared to non-theory-based interventions for effectiveness of outcomes relating to health behaviour . Less than half of the RCTs included in the review s reported the use of theory ( 85/183 ) . Two review s suggested interventions based on control theory , motivational interviewing , or self-determination theory were associated with greater effectiveness for physical activity and /or dietary interventions and outcomes . Method ological and reporting issues limit the conclusions . CONCLUSIONS Theory-based interventions as currently operationalized in systematic review s were not found to be more effective than non-theory-based interventions . Method ological and reporting issues at study and review level may not reflect the true utility of theory use within health behaviour interventions . The promotion of theory use may benefit from using a multifaceted argument , rather than a narrow focus of increased effectiveness . Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject ? Theory use is regularly promoted by cl aim ing that it will lead to more effective behaviour change interventions . Theory use has been frequently linked to effectiveness within systematic review s of behaviour change interventions . The theory-effectiveness hypothesis has not been systematic ally examined at the systematic review level . What does this study add ? Theory use as operationalized by systematic review authors was not associated with increased effectiveness within systematic review s examining r and omized controlled trials of behaviour change interventions in adults . Interventions based on control theory , motivational interviewing , or self-determination theory were associated with greater effectiveness for physical activity and /or dietary interventions and outcomes . Theory use should be promoted using a multifaceted argument , and assertions for increased effectiveness of theory-based interventions should only be used in domains where specific evidence exists to support this cl aim Background The ideal evidence to answer a question about the effectiveness of treatment is a systematic review . However , for many clinical questions a systematic review will not be available , or may not be up to date . One option could be to use the evidence from an individual trial to answer the question ? Methods We assessed how often ( a ) the estimated effect and ( b ) the p-value in the most precise single trial in a meta- analysis agreed with the whole meta- analysis . For a r and om sample of 200 completed Cochrane Review s ( January , 2005 ) we identified a primary outcome and extracted : the number of trials , the statistical weight of the most precise trial , the estimate and confidence interval for both the highest weighted trial and the meta- analysis overall . We calculated the p-value for the most precise trial and meta- analysis . Results Of 200 review s , only 132 provided a meta- analysis of 2 or more trials , with a further 35 effect estimates based on single trials . The average number of trials was 7.3 , with the most precise trial contributing , on average , 51 % of the statistical weight to the summary estimate from the whole meta- analysis . The estimates of effect from the most precise trial and the overall meta-analyses were highly correlated ( rank correlation of 0.90).There was an 81 % agreement in statistical conclusions . Results from the most precise trial were statistically significant in 60 of the 167 evaluable review s , with 55 of the corresponding systematic review s also being statistically significant . The five discrepant results were not strikingly different with respect to their estimates of effect , but showed considerable statistical heterogeneity between trials in these meta-analyses . However , among the 101 cases in which the most precise trial was not statistically significant , the corresponding meta-analyses yielded 31 statistically significant results . Conclusions Single most precise trials provided similar estimates of effects to those of the meta-analyses to which they contributed , and statistically significant results are generally in agreement . However , " negative " results were less reliable , as may be expected from single underpowered trials . For systematic review ers we suggest that : ( 1 ) key trial(s ) in a review deserve greater attention ( 2 ) systematic review ers should check agreement of the most precise trial and the meta analysis . For clinicians using trials we suggest that when a meta- analysis is not available , a focus on the most precise trial is reasonable provided it is adequately powered AIMS To analyse the effect on systematic review s in diabetes interventions of including only trials that are indexed in medline , and to assess the impact of adding trials from other data bases and the grey literature . METHODS All systematic review s of diabetes interventions which included a meta- analysis of r and omized controlled trials , and were published since 1996 , were selected . The impact on the meta- analysis of including only those trials indexed in medline , and the effect of then adding trials from other sources , was assessed . Where possible this was measured quantitatively , by redoing the meta- analysis , otherwise a qualitative estimate was made . RESULTS Forty-four systematic review s met our inclusion criteria . There were 120 articles reporting trial data which were not indexed in medline . These came from 52 % of the review s. In 34 % of the review s , basing a meta- analysis on a search of only medline would miss trials that could affect the result . Sources of non- medline data which had the biggest effect on the meta-analyses were journal articles from central and embase ( mainly in Diabetes , Nutrition and Metabolism ) and unpublished data ( mainly from industry ) . The exceptions were journal articles on herbal medicine , mostly indexed in Chinese language data bases . CONCLUSIONS A search of only the medline data base is insufficient for systematic review s of diabetes , because in about 34 % of review s the missed trials could affect the results of the meta- analysis . It is recommended that central ( on the Cochrane Library ) also be search ed . Scanning meeting abstract s , and seeking unpublished data are also recommended if the intervention has only recently been introduced Background It is generally believed that exhaustive search es of bibliographic data bases are needed for systematic review s of health care interventions . The CENTRAL data base of controlled trials ( RCTs ) has been built up by exhaustive search ing . The CONSORT statement aims to encourage better reporting , and hence indexing , of RCTs . Our aim was to assess whether developments in the CENTRAL data base , and the CONSORT statement , mean that a simplified RCT search strategy for identifying RCTs now suffices for systematic review s of health care interventions . Methods RCTs used in the Cochrane review s were identified . A brief RCT search strategy ( BRSS ) , consisting of a search of CENTRAL , and then for variants of the word r and om across all fields ( r and om$.af . ) in MEDLINE and EMBASE , was devised and run . Any trials included in the meta-analyses , but missed by the BRSS , were identified . The meta-analyses were then re-run , with and without the missed RCTs , and the differences quantified . The proportion of trials with variants of the word r and om in the title or abstract was calculated for each year . The number of RCTs retrieved by search ing with " r and om$.af . " was compared to the highly sensitive search strategy ( HSSS ) . Results The BRSS had a sensitivity of 94 % . It found all journal RCTs in 47 of the 57 review s. The missing RCTs made some significant differences to a small proportion of the total outcomes in only five review s , but no important differences in conclusions result ed . In the post-CONSORT years , 1997–2003 , the percentage of RCTs with r and om in the title or abstract was 85 % , a mean increase of 17 % compared to the seven years pre-CONSORT ( 95 % CI , 8.3 % to 25.9 % ) . The search using r and om$.af . reduced the MEDLINE retrieval by 84 % , compared to the HSSS , thereby reducing the workload of checking retrievals . Conclusion A brief RCT search strategy is now sufficient to locate RCTs for systematic review s in most cases . Exhaustive search ing is no longer cost-effective , because in effect it has already been done for CENTRAL Background The role of vitamin D in management of depression is unclear . Results from observational and emerging r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) investigating the efficacy of vitamin D in depression lack consistency - with some suggesting a positive association while others show a negative or inconclusive association . Methods / Design The primary aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of RCTs to assess the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on depression symptoms measured by scales and the proportion of patients with symptomatic improvement according to the authors ’ original definition . Secondary aims include assessing the change in quality of life , adverse events and treatment discontinuation . We will conduct the systematic review and meta- analysis according to the recommendations of the Cochrane H and book for Systematic Review s of Interventions . We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL ) , MEDLINE ( 1966 to present ) , EMBASE ( 1980 to present ) , CINAHL ( 1982 to present ) , PsychINFO ( 1967 to present ) and Clinical Trials.gov . Unpublished work will be identified by search ing two major conferences : the International Vitamin Conference , the Anxiety Disorders and Depression Conference , while grey literature will be acquired by contacting authors of included studies . We will use the r and om-effects meta- analysis to synthesize the data by pooling the results of included studies . Discussion The results of this systematic review will be helpful in clarifying the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation and providing evidence to establish guidelines for implementation of vitamin D for depression in general practice and other relevant setting s. Study registration Unique identifier : CRD42013003849 Background Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor used to limit perioperative bleeding and reduce the need for donated blood transfusions during cardiac surgery . R and omized controlled trials of aprotinin evaluating its effect on the outcome of perioperative transfusion have been published since 1987 , and systematic review s were conducted in 1992 and 1997 . Methods A systematic search was conducted for all RCTs of aprotinin  that used placebo controls or were open-label with no active control treatment . Data collected included the primary outcome , objective of each study , whether a systematic review was cited or conducted as part of the background and /or rationale for the study and the number of previously published RCTs cited . Cumulative meta-analyses were performed . Results Sixty-four r and omized , controlled trials of aprotinin were found , conducted between 1987 and 2002 , reporting an endpoint of perioperative transfusion .  Median trial size was 64 subjects , with a range of 20 to 1784 . A cumulative meta- analysis indicated that aprotinin greatly decreased the need for perioperative transfusion , stabilizing at an odds ratio of 0.25 ( p , 10 2 6 ) by the 12th study , published in June of 1992 . The upper limit of the confidence interval never exceeded 0.65 and results were similar in all subgroups . Citation of previous RCTs was extremely low , with a median of 20 % of prior trials cited . Only 7 of 44 ( 15 % ) of subsequent reports referenced the largest trial ( N 1/4 1784 ) , which was 28 times larger than the median trial size . Conclusions This study demonstrates that investigators evaluating aprotinin were not adequately citing previous research , result ing in a large number of RCTs being conducted to address efficacy questions that prior trials had already definitively answered . Institutional review boards and journals could reduce the number of redundant trials by requiring investigators to conduct adequate search es for prior evidence and conducting systematic review
Overall , the current meta- analysis demonstrated that resveratrol intake significantly reduced weight , BMI , WC and fat mass , and significantly increased lean mass , but did not affect leptin and adiponectin levels
Abstract This systematic review and meta- analysis of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) was conducted to summarize the effect of resveratrol intake on weight loss .