Reducing musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators: comparison between ergonomics interventions at the workplace Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Are Work Disability Prevention Interventions Effective for the Management of Neck Pain or Upper Extremity Disorders? A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration Workplace Prevention and Musculoskeletal Injuries in Nurses Ergonomic Training Reduces Musculoskeletal Disorders among Office Workers: Results from the 6-Month Follow-Up. Effectiveness of participatory training for prevention of musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial Effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among computer workers: a randomized controlled trial A Tailored Workplace Exercise Program for Women at Risk for Neck and Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial The implementation of occupational health guidelines principles for reducing sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders. Musculoskeletal disorders and occupational exposures: How should we judge the evidence concerning the causal association? Effect of yogic exercises on symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders of upper limbs among computer users: a randomised controlled trial. The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers A Health System Program To Reduce Work Disability Related to Musculoskeletal Disorders Musculoskeletal symptoms and job satisfaction among office-workers: a cross-sectional study from Iran. Workplace strength training prevents deterioration of work ability among workers with chronic pain and work disability: a randomized controlled trial. Evaluation of ‘I-Preventive’: a digital preventive tool for musculoskeletal disorders in computer workers—a pilot cluster randomised trial Physical activity is associated with a low prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in the Royal Norwegian Navy: a cross sectional study Shoulder muscle co-ordination during chronic and acute experimental neck-shoulder pain. An occupational pain study Effectiveness of workplace interventions in rehabilitating musculoskeletal disorders and preventing its consequences among workers with physical and sedentary employment: systematic review protocol A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of two workstation interventions on upper body pain and incident musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. Effect of two contrasting interventions on upper limb chronic pain and disability: a randomized controlled trial. Physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in New Zealand nurses, postal workers and office workers
Typing is associated with musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) caused by multiple risk factors . This control study aim ed to evaluate the efficacy of a workplace intervention for reducing  MSDs among computer workers . Sixty-six subjects with and without MSD were assigned consecutively to one of three groups : ergonomics intervention ( work site and body posture adjustments , muscle activity training and exercises ) accompanied with biofeedback training , the same ergonomics intervention without biofeedback and a control group . Evaluation of MSDs , body posture , psychosocial status , upper extremity ( UE ) kinematics and muscle surface electromyography were carried out before and after the intervention in the workplace and the motion lab . Our main hypothesis that significant differences in the reduction of MSDs will exist between subjects in the study groups and controls was confirmed ( χ2 = 13.3 ; p = 0.001 ) . Significant changes were found in UE kinematics and posture as well . Both ergonomics interventions effectively reduced MSD and improved body posture . Practitioner Summary : This study aim ed to test the efficacy of an individual workplace intervention programme among computer workers by evaluating musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , body posture , upper extremity kinematics , muscle activity and psychosocial factors were tested . The proposed ergonomics interventions effectively reduced MSDs and improved body posture OBJECTIVE Since 2002 , an epidemiologic surveillance system of work-related , upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) has been implemented in France 's Pays de la Loire region to assess the prevalence of MSDs and their risk factors in the working population . METHODS The surveillance was based on a network of occupational physicians ( OPs ) and used the recommendations of a group of European experts ( criteria document consensus ) . In 2002 - 2003 , 80 of 400 OPs volunteered to participate . All underwent a training program to st and ardize the physical examination .  Health status was assessed by self-administered question naire and physical examination . Occupational risk factors were assessed by self-administered question naire .  Exposure scores were computed for each anatomic zone by summing the risk factors taken into account by the criteria document . RESULTS More than 50 % of the 2,685 men and women r and omly included in 2002 - 2003 experienced nonspecific musculoskeletal symptoms during the preceeding 12 months and approximately 30 % experienced them in the preceeding week . The prevalence of clinical ly diagnosed MSDs was high : approximately 13 % of workers experienced at least 1 of the MSDs . The most frequent disorder was rotator cuff syndrome followed by carpal tunnel syndrome and lateral epicondylitis . The prevalence of MSDs increased with age and varied widely across economic sectors and occupations . More than half of the workers were exposed to at least 2 risk factors of MSDs . Exposure varied according to industrial activity and occupation . According to the criteria document , a high percentage of MSD cases could be classified as probably work related ( 95 % in men and 89 % in women age < 50 , and 87 % in men and 69 % in women age > 50 ) . CONCLUSION Nonspecific upper-limb symptoms and specific upper-limb MSDs are common in the working population . These results show the need to implement prevention programs in most sectors to reduce the prevalence of MSDs Abstract Purpose We conducted a systematic review to critically appraise and synthesize literature on the effectiveness of work disability prevention ( WDP ) interventions in workers with neck pain , whiplash-associated disorders ( WAD ) , or upper extremity disorders . Methods We search ed electronic data bases from 1990 to 2012 . R and om pairs of independent review ers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria . Scientifically admissible studies were summarized and synthesized following best- evidence synthesis methodology . Results Of the 6,359 articles retrieved , 16 r and omized controlled trials were eligible for critical appraisal and five were admissible . We found that a return-to-work coordination program ( including workplace-based work hardening ) was superior to clinic-based work hardening for persistent rotator cuff tendinitis . Workplace high-intensity strength training and workplace advice had similar outcomes for neck and shoulder pain . Mensendieck/Cesar postural exercises and strength and fitness exercises had similar outcomes for non-specific work-related upper limb complaints . Adding a brief job stress education program to a workplace ergonomic intervention was not beneficial for persistent upper extremity symptoms . Adding computer-prompted work breaks to ergonomic adjustments and workplace education benefited workers ’ recovery from recent work-related neck and upper extremity complaints . Conclusions At present , no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of WDP interventions for managing neck pain , WAD , and upper extremity disorders . Our review suggests a return-to-work coordination program is more effective than clinic-based work hardening . Also , adding computer-prompted breaks to ergonomic and workplace interventions benefits workers ’ recovery . The current quality of evidence does not allow for a definitive evaluation of the effectiveness of ergonomic interventions Objective The purpose of this study was to describe the availability of preventive devices and training in relation to neck , shoulder , and back musculoskeletal injuries/disorders ( MSD ) in registered nurses . Summary background data Nurses have one of the highest rates of MSD of any occupation . Studies have shown that mechanical lifting devices and lifting teams can reduce MSD rates and associated costs . Methods Data from 1163 r and omly selected currently working nurses ( 1 + years on the current job ) were collected in anonymous mailed surveys ( 74 % response rate ) . MSD cases had neck , shoulder , and /or back symptoms for at least 1 week , or at least monthly , and moderate or more pain , in the past year . Results Nurses with mechanical lifting devices available were significantly less likely to have neck or back MSDs . Back injury was less likely when lifting teams were available . However , adjustable beds and transfer sheets were associated with greater odds of back MSD . Training in workstation adjustment was associated with significantly lower MSD prevalence , though postural training was not . Conclusions Though use of mechanical devices and lifting teams was limited in nursing workplaces , these prevention strategies were related to reduced odds of MSD . Nursing administrators can use these findings to consider workplace changes BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are commonly reported among computer users . This study explored whether these disorders can be reduced by the provision of ergonomics education . METHODS A cluster r and omised controlled trial was conducted in which 3 units were r and omised for intervention and received training , and 3  units  were given a leaflet . The effect of intervention on workstation habits , musculoskeletal disorders , days and episodes of sick leave , and psychological well-being were assessed . RESULTS A significant improvement in workstation habits was found , and the differences remained significant at the follow-up time point for keyboard , mouse , chair , and desk use . The largest reduction in the percentage of musculoskeletal disorders was in the neck region ( -42.2 % , 95 % CI -60.0 to -24.4 ) . After adjusting for baseline values , significant differences were found at the follow-up time point in the neck , right shoulder , right and left upper limbs , lower back , and right and left lower limbs . No significant differences were found for the days and episodes of sick leave or the psychological well-being among workers after the intervention . CONCLUSION Consistent reductions were observed for all musculoskeletal disorders at the follow-up time point , although the difference was not statistically significant for the upper back . The improvements in the musculoskeletal disorders did not translate into fewer days lost from work or improved psychological well-being Purpose Health and safety training program has been applied to prevent work-related  musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in workplace . We evaluated the effectiveness of participatory training and didactic training programs on MSD prevention among frontline workers in Shenzhen , China . Methods The authors r and omly assigned 918 workers from intervention factories to receive participatory training ( intervention group ) , and 907 workers from intervention factories and 1,654 workers from control factories to receive didactic training ( control_1 group , control_2 group , respectively ) from June 1 , 2008 to November 30 , 2009 . Participants were asked to report experience of ache , pain or discomfort in 10 body parts at baseline and 1 year after training . Data were analyzed to compare the MSD prevalence 1 year before and 1 year after training in different groups from 2009 to 2010 . Results The follow-up rate was 61 % ( 2,120/3,479 ) at 1 year after training . In the year after training , there were no statistically significant changes in the proportion of workers who reported MSD in any body part . MSD prevalence rates in the intervention group reduced from 16.8 to 9.9 % for lower extremities ( χ2 = 13.102 , p < 0.001 ) and from 12.9 to 8.3 % ( χ2 = 9.433 , p = 0.002 ) for wrist and finger at 1 year after training . However , the rates did not change significantly for upper back , lower back , neck , shoulder and elbow in the intervention group and for all 10 body parts in two control groups . Conclusions Overall , the training programs did not seem to prevent the occurrence of MSD among frontline workers . However , participatory training might be effective to reduce MSD in the lower extremities and wrist and finger Purpose The aim of the study was to determine effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( WUEMSDs )  among computer workers . Methods Four hundred computer workers answered a question naire on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms ( WUEMSS ) . Ninety-four subjects with WUEMSS using computers at least 3 h a day participated in a prospect i ve , r and omized controlled 6-month intervention . Body posture and workstation layouts were assessed by the Ergonomic Question naire . We used the Visual Analogue Scale to assess the intensity of WUEMSS . The Upper Extremity Function Scale was used to evaluate functional limitations at the neck and upper extremities . Health-related quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36 . After baseline assessment , those in the intervention group participated in a multicomponent ergonomic intervention program including a comprehensive ergonomic training consisting of two interactive sessions , an ergonomic training brochure , and workplace visits with workstation adjustments . Follow-up assessment was conducted after 6 months . Results In the intervention group , body posture ( p < 0.001 ) and workstation layout ( p = 0.002 ) improved over 6 months ; furthermore , intensity ( p < 0.001 ) , duration ( p < 0.001 ) , and frequency ( p = 0.009 ) of WUEMSS decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group . Additionally , the functional status ( p = 0.001 ) , and physical ( p < 0.001 ) , and mental ( p = 0.035 ) health-related quality of life improved significantly compared with the controls . There was no improvement of work day loss due to WUEMSS ( p > 0.05 ) . Conclusions Ergonomic intervention programs may be effective in reducing ergonomic risk factors among computer workers and consequently in the secondary prevention of WUEMSDs Objective : The aim of this study was to evaluate a tailored physical activity protocol performed in a work environment with a group of female workers employed in manual precision tasks to reduce upper limb pain . Methods : Sixty female subjects were r and omly assigned to an intervention group or a control group . The IG was administered of a 6-month , twice-a-week , tailored exercise program , whereas the CG received no intervention . Results : The IG showed a reduction on shoulder pain accompanied by increases on the range of motion measures . In addition , reductions in upper limb pain and neck disability were detected with concomitant increases in grip strength . Conclusions : This study indicated positive effects of a tailored workplace exercise protocol in female workers exposed to moderate risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders , showing clinical ly meaningful reductions of pain symptoms and disability on upper limb and neck regions BACKGROUND Occupational health guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach to manage  sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , with a primary focus on early intervention through provision of a supportive network . AIMS To investigate the implementation of a guidelines -based intervention ( early contact of absentees ; addressing psychosocial obstacles ; offering temporary modified work ; communicating among the players ) , and to determine whether this is effective for reducing return-to-work times and duration of future absence . METHODS A non-r and omized controlled trial was conducted within a UK company . Occupational health nurses at two experimental sites ( 1,435 workers ) were trained to deliver the intervention to workers taking absence due to MSDs ( low back and upper limb disorders ) , while usual care was delivered at three control sites ( 1,483 workers ) .  Company-recorded absence data were collected over a 12-month follow-up period . RESULTS The implementation of the experimental intervention was impeded by unforeseen organizational obstacles at one site ( policies , procedures and individual approaches ) which had a detrimental effect on uptake and delivery . At the site where the intervention was delivered per protocol , absence was significantly less compared with controls ; 6.5 and 10.8 days , respectively . However , the duration of future absence was not significantly different ( 13.0 and 25.1 days , respectively ) . CONCLUSIONS An early intervention addressing psychosocial obstacles to recovery can be effective for reducing absence due to MSDs . Successful implementation , where the key players are onside and organizational obstacles are overcome , is difficult to achieve Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) affecting the back , upper and lower extremities are widespread in the general population , implying a variety of causal factors . Multiple causes are not mutually exclusive , and a high background rate does not preclude associations with specific factors that are uncommon in the general population . MSDs have well-documented associations with occupational ergonomic stressors such as repetitive motion , heavy lifting , non-neutral postures , and vibration . Organizational features of the work environment , such as time pressure and low decision latitude , may also play a role , at least by potentiating the effects of physical loading . Numerous systematic review s have mostly concurred with these overall findings . Nevertheless , some continue to debate whether MSDs are sometimes work-related , even for those performing jobs with repetitive and routinized tasks , heavy lifting , and /or pronounced postural strain . This article discusses ( 1 ) some epidemiologic features of MSDs that underlie that debate ; and ( 2 ) the question of what should appropriately be considered a gold st and ard for scientific evidence on an etiological question such as the health effects of a non-voluntary exposure , such as an occupational or environmental agent . In particular , r and omized clinical trials have little relevance for determining the health effects of non-therapeutic risk factors BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( MSD ) are very common in regular computer users and leading cause of work related illness . The objective of the present study is to evaluate effectiveness of yogic exercises in the improvement of symptoms of MSDs of upper limbs . MATERIAL S AND METHODS 60 study participants were r and omly divided into two groups that is yoga with counselling and only counselling group for 12 weeks . Symptom severity and functional status were assessed using the self administered Boston Carpal Tunnel Question naire and pre design ed symptom question naire before and after intervention . RESULTS There was significant reduction in symptom severity score ( P = 0.002 ) and improvement in functional status score in yoga with counselling group when compared to only counselling group . There is also a significant decrease in self reported symptoms like CT myalgia symptom ( P = 0.019 ) and improvement in weakness . CONCLUSION The present study showed a yoga based regimen is more effective than counselling alone in relieving symptoms of computer related musculoskeletal disorders Background Neck and upper limb symptoms are frequently reported by computer workers .  Work style interventions are most commonly used to reduce work-related neck and upper limb symptoms but lifestyle physical activity interventions are becoming more popular to enhance workers health and reduce work-related symptoms . A combined approach targeting work style and lifestyle physical activity seems promising , but little is known on the effectiveness of such combined interventions . Methods / design The RSI@Work study is a r and omised controlled trial that aims to assess the added value of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention to reduce neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers . Computer workers from seven Dutch companies with frequent or long-term neck and upper limb symptoms in the preceding six months and /or the last two weeks are r and omised into three groups : ( 1 ) work style group , ( 2 ) work style and physical activity group , or ( 3 ) control group . The work style intervention consists of six group meetings in a six month period that take place at the workplace , during work time , and under the supervision of a specially trained counsellor . The goal of this intervention is to stimulate workplace adjustment and to improve body posture , the number and quality of breaks and coping behaviour with regard to high work dem and s. In the combined ( work style and physical activity ) intervention the additional goal is to increase moderate to heavy physical activity . The control group receives usual care . Primary outcome measures are degree of recovery , pain intensity , disability , number of days with neck and upper limb symptoms , and number of months without neck and upper limb symptoms . Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and six and 12 months after r and omisation . Cost-effectiveness of the group meetings will be assessed using an employer 's perspective . Discussion This study will be one of the first to assess the added value of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention in reducing neck and upper limb symptoms of computer workers . The results of the study are expected in 2007 Context Nonoccupational musculoskeletal disorders account for a large proportion of work disability and represent a major financial burden on society . Contribution A voluntary , r and omized , controlled intervention study consisted of avoidance of bed rest , early mobilization , avoidance of splints , stretching exercises , ergonomic training , provision of educational booklets , and suggestions for optimal levels of physical activity . Although return to work was never forced , temporary work disability , long-term disability , and costs were significantly decreased in the intervention group . Implication s The personal and financial impact of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders ( not related to work injury ) may be mitigated by a voluntary program of education and rehabilitation . The Editors Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are prevalent and potentially disabling conditions ( 1 ) that consume a large proportion of health care re sources ( 2 - 4 ) and together are the leading cause of functional loss in adults ( 3 - 8 ) . The social costs of MSDs are enormous , often overshadowing those of other chronic conditions ( 9 , 10 ) . In industrialized societies , MSDs are one of the most common causes of temporary work disability and the chief cause of permanent work disability ( 11 ) , accounting for productivity losses equivalent to 1.3 % of the U.S. gross national product ( 12 ) . Work disability related to MSDs is a challenge to employability , business productivity , and the capacity of health and social security systems . Various strategies for addressing MSD-related work disability have been promoted in the field of occupational health , including strategies involving legislation , risk management , ergonomics , prevention , education , and social work ( 13 ) . However , the role of health systems remains ill-defined in this field . The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an intervention program , integrated into the health system and offered to the working population , could reduce the impact of recent-onset MSD-related temporary work disability . Methods Setting Of the 5.5 million persons in Madrid , Spain , 98 % receive health coverage from the Instituto Madrileo de Salud . Care is organized into 11 health districts . Patients have direct access to primary care physicians , who refer patients to specialized care if needed . Disability compensation payments are made by the Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social ( INSS ) , a division of the Ministry of Work . Any worker who requires sick leave is given a temporary work disability initiation form that states the diagnosis made by the primary care physician and entitles the worker to receive INSS compensation payments . The form is renewed weekly by the primary care physician until the worker 1 ) recovers and receives an ending form , 2 ) reaches a maximum of 18 months of temporary work disability , or 3 ) receives a proposal for evaluation for permanent work disability . Proposals for permanent work disability are evaluated by the INSS , which determines the need for and type of long-term compensation . Inspection services in each health district oversee all administrative aspects of these processes . Design We did a r and omized , controlled study , unblinded for both patients and physicians , to test whether a clinical intervention could improve the outcome of patients with recent-onset MSD-related temporary work disability . The study began in March 1998 in health district 7 and in March 1999 in health districts 4 and 9 . Selection and r and omization of patients was done during the first year of the study in each district . Follow-up lasted for another year . Patients and Selection Criteria Health districts 4 , 7 , and 9 were chosen . Health district 4 had a total population of 508249 persons and an active working population of 192939 persons ; health district 7 had a total population of 522742 persons and an active working population of 179155 persons ; and health district 9 had a total population of 371294 persons and an active working population of 135475 persons ( 14 ) . The inclusion criterion was the issue of a common diseases temporary work disability initiation form , with an MSD-related cause reported by the primary care physician , within the inclusion period . The MSD-related causes included all arthropathies , connective tissue disorders , back disorders , soft-tissue rheumatisms , bone and cartilage disorders , musculoskeletal pain not caused by cancer , and nerve entrapment syndromes . Patients were excluded if they had a common diseases temporary work disability form with an MSD-related cause result ing from trauma or surgery . They were also excluded if they had work accidents or professional diseases noted on the temporary work disability initiation form . Work accidents are primarily sudden , external , violent causes of disease occurring at work or during travel to work , and they represent less than 27 % of cases of temporary work disability . Professional diseases include silicosis , asbestos-related mesothelioma , and noise-induced hearing loss , and they represent less than 1 % of cases of temporary work disability . R and omization All temporary work disability initiation forms meeting the selection criteria were collected daily by a study rheumatologist and coded . The patients associated with the forms were r and omly assigned to either the intervention group , which received a specific care program , or the  control group  , which received st and ard care ( Figure 1 ) . Computer-generated lists of pseudor and om numbers were produced for each district . Group assignments were r and omly done in blocks of 50 patients with intervention : control ratios of 1:1 in district 7 and 2:3 in districts 4 and 9 . This was done so that similar numbers of patients would be seen by the rheumatologists in all areas . The ratios were based on the number of episodes of MSD-related temporary work disability registered in previous years . Patients maintained their group assignments in successive episodes of MSD-related temporary work disability during follow-up . Figure 1 . Flow diagram of the study . Care in the Intervention Group A secretary contacted all patients assigned to the intervention group by telephone or mail as soon as possible after the initiation form was issued , offering them an appointment in the program . Patients who voluntarily decided to enter the program were attended by 2 rheumatologists in each district who worked full-time for the study . Patients were seen as often as necessary until the episode of temporary work disability was resolved or recovery was deemed unrealistic . Patients who were assigned to the intervention group but were unable or unwilling to participate , were already working , or could not be located were considered to be assigned to the intervention group throughout the study for statistical purpose s. Within the intervention program , care was delivered in regular visits and included education , clinical management , and administrative duties . Education At the first 45-minute visit , patients received a specific diagnosis , reassurance that no serious disease was present , instructions on self-management , instructions on taking medications on a fixed schedule , and information on indications for return to work before complete symptom remission . Return to work was negotiated with patients and was never forced on them . Instructions on self-management included instructions to avoid bed rest , instructions to promote early mobilization of the painful regions , restrictions on the use of splint and neck collars , training in stretching and strengthening exercises ( 15 - 18 ) , teaching of ergonomic care ( 19 ) , delivery of booklets in instances of back or neck pain ( 19 ) , and information on optimal levels of physical activity ( 20 ) . Patients with higher degrees of disability or abnormal pain behavior received immediate extra reassurance , information on pain-relieving positions , and a telephone call or second visit within 72 hours . Specific protocol s were created for low-back ( 21 ) , neck , shoulder , arm and h and , knee , and foot pain ( 19 , 22 - 25 ) and included the 3-level clinical -management system described later . Moving a patient from the lower to the upper levels of the system implied the need for further diagnostic or therapeutic procedures and was indicated 1 ) after a patient spent a predefined period at the lower level without return to work or substantial clinical improvement or 2 ) by the clinical judgment of the rheumatologist . At the first level of the system , patients received the clinical management started at the first visit , including a diagnosis based on clinical criteria , pharmacologic treatment of pain and inflammation , pharmacologic treatment of anxiety and depression , peripheral intra- and periarticular injections ( 26 ) , and education . Time spent at the first level averaged 2 to 6 weeks . At the second level , patients received maintenance of therapy plus referral for formal rehabilitation and laboratory tests , radiography , computerized tomography , magnetic resonance imaging , and electromyography . After 4 to 8 weeks with no improvement at the second level , patients were moved to the third level and received further diagnostic procedures or referral for surgical or other specialized care . Red flags were defined , including age older than 50 years for patients with axial pain , previous trauma , cancer , serious medical illness , inflammatory pain , night pain , drug abuse , corticosteroid use , fever , weight loss , progressively deteriorating function , and progressive neurologic deficit . The presence of a red flag precluded the use of the level system , and the patient in question was managed according to clinical criteria , with a focus on excluding serious illness . Treatment Failures Patients who did not respond to interventions at the second level of the system were examined for the presence of yellow flags , which included psychiatric illness , family problems , sociolabor conflicts , unemployment , and occupational causes of disability . The presence of a OBJECTIVE Office-work poses a high-risk for musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , with consequences for workers , employers and society . The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in a sample of Iranian office workers , to investigate the association between pain severity and job satisfaction and to investigate the association between MSDs and job satisfaction . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Iranian office workers from a university setting ( n=91 ) were r and omly selected and included in this cross-sectional study . The  Nordic musculoskeletal question naire plus visual analogue scale of pain  , and the Brayfield-Rothe Job Satisfaction Index  were used to study the prevalence of MSDs , pain intensity and job satisfaction , respectively . Descriptive analysis , Pearson 's correlation , and multiple regression analysis were performed for statistical assessment . RESULTS Eighty-nine percent of participants reported musculoskeletal symptoms during the past 12 months , most commonly in the neck ( 69.2 % ) , low back ( 58.2 % ) , knees ( 41.8 % ) , shoulders ( 35.2 % ) , and upper back ( 34.1 % ) . There was a significant negative correlation between pain intensity and job satisfaction . Pain intensity , low-back pain in the last week , wrist pain in the past 12 months and shoulder pain were significantly associated with job satisfaction ( p<0.05 ) . CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that musculoskeletal symptoms are common in Iranian office workers , associated with low job satisfaction . These findings indicate the need for more attention to MSDs among office workers and design ing effective preventive interventions OBJECTIVE Imbalance between work dem and s and individual re sources can lead to musculoskeletal disorders and reduced work ability . The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two contrasting interventions on work ability among slaughterhouse workers with chronic pain and work disability . METHODS Sixty-six slaughterhouse workers with upper-limb chronic pain and work disability were r and omly allocated to 10 weeks of either strength training for the shoulder , arm , and h and muscles ( 3 times per week , 10 minutes per session ) or ergonomic training ( usual care control group ) from September to December 2012 . The outcome measure was the change from baseline to 10-week follow-up in the work ability index ( WAI ) . RESULTS A priori hypothesis testing showed a group × time interaction for WAI ( P<0.05 ) . Compared with the ergonomic training group , WAI increased 2.3 [ 95 % confidence interval ( 95 % CI ) 0.9 - 3.7 ] in the strength training group corresponding to a moderate effect size ( Cohen 's d 0.52 ) . Within-group changes indicated that between-group differences were mainly caused by a reduction in WAI in the ergonomic group . Of the 7 items of WAI , item 2 ( work ability in relation to the dem and s of the job ) and item 7 ( mental re sources ) increased following strength training compared with ergonomic training ( P<0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Implementation of strength training at the workplace prevents deterioration of work ability among manual workers with chronic pain and disability exposed to forceful and repetitive job tasks . Thus , strength training performed at the workplace may in fact be regarded as a complex biopsychosocial intervention modality that reaches further than the specific physiological benefits of training per se Objectives I-Preventive is a digital preventive tool for musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in computer workers . We sought to determine its impact on pain in computer workers with upper limb MSDs and visual discomfort . Methods We conducted a pilot cluster r and omised trial in 2 different sites of a tyre factory in France . We r and omised 200 employees to either an  intervention group ( I-Preventive ) or control group  , each comprising symptomatic and asymptomatic employees . The workers were followed up for 5 months . The main outcome was overall recovery from symptoms following 1 month 's intervention based on Nordic-style and eyestrain question naires . Results We included 185/200 workers : 96 in the intervention group ( mean age 41.8±1.4 years ; 88.5 % males ) and 79 in the control group ( mean age 42.9±12.0 years ; 94.5 % males ) . The most painful areas ( numerical scale ≥2 ) were the neck ( 40.0 % ) , upper back ( 18.8 % ) and shoulders ( 15.7 % ) . For the most painful anatomical area , the Nordic score significantly decreased after 1 month in the intervention group ( p=0.038 ) ; no change was observed in the control group ( p=0.59 ) . After 1 month 's use , the intervention group reported less pain in the painful area and less visual discomfort symptoms ( p=0.02 ) . Adherence to the I-Preventive program was 60 % . Conclusions I-Preventive is effective in the short term on musculoskeletal symptoms and visual discomfort by promoting active breaks and eyestrain treatment . This easy-to-use digital tool allows each worker to focus on areas of their choice via personalised , easy exercises that can be performed in the workplace . Trial registration number NCT02350244 ; Pre- results Background Despite considerable knowledge about musculoskeletal disorders ( MSD ) and physical , psychosocial and individual risk factors there is limited knowledge about physical activity as a factor in preventing MSD . In addition , studies of physical activity are often limited to either leisure activity or physical activity at work . Studies among military personnel on the association between physical activity at work and at leisure and MSD are lacking . This study was conducted to find the prevalence of MSD among personnel in the Royal Norwegian Navy and to assess the association between physical activity at work and at leisure and MSD . Methods A question naire about musculoskeletal disorders , physical activity and background data ( employment status , age , gender , body mass index , smoking , education and physical stressors ) was completed by 2265 workers ( 58 % ) 18 to 70 years old in the Royal Norwegian Navy .  Multiple logistic regression with 95 % confidence intervals was used to assess the relationship between physical activity and musculoskeletal disorders . Results A total of 32 % of the workers reported musculoskeletal disorders often or very often in one or more parts of the body in the past year . The most common musculoskeletal disorders were in the lower back ( 15 % often or very often ) , shoulders ( 12 % often or very often ) and neck ( 11 % often or very often ) . After adjustment for confounders , physical activity was inversely associated with musculoskeletal disorders for all body sites except elbows , knees and feet . Conclusion The one-year prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among workers in the Royal Norwegian Navy was rather low . A physically active lifestyle both at work and at leisure was associated with fewer musculoskeletal disorders  among personnel in the Royal Norwegian Navy . Prospect i ve studies are necessary to confirm the cause and effect in this association Abstract Little is known about the mechanisms leading to chronic neck-shoulder musculoskeletal disorders  ( MSD ) . The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare motor function during controlled , low load , repetitive work together with chronic or acute experimental neck-shoulder pain . The clinical study was performed on workers with ( n = 12 ) and without ( n = 6 ) chronic neck-shoulder pain . In the experimental study , experimental muscle pain was induced in healthy subjects by intra-muscular injection of hypertonic saline into the trapezius muscle ( n = 10 ) . The assessed parameters related to motor performance were : work task event duration , cutting forces , surface electromyogram ( EMG ) activity in four shoulder muscles , displacement of the centre of pressure , and arm and trunk 3D movements . For controlled cutting force levels , chronic and acute experimental pain provoked a series of changes : a decreased working rhythm and a protective reorganisation of muscle synergy ( experimental study ) , higher EMG frequency contents which may indicate altered motor unit recruitment , and greater postural activity and a tendency towards increased arm and trunk movements . These pain-related changes can play a role in the development of MSD . The present clinical and experimental study demonstrated similar interactions between motor co-ordination and neck-shoulder pain in occupational setting s. We therefore suggest that this experimental model can be used to study mechanisms related to MSD . Information on such modulatory processes may help in the design of new strategies aim ed at reducing the development of MSD Background Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are the leading cause of work disability and sickness absence worldwide . The prevalence of MSDs increases with age , consequently challenging sustainable employability among the growing ageing workforce . Knowledge of feasible and efficient workplace-based interventions to rehabilitate MSD or prevent its consequences is therefore warranted . This systematic review will evaluate the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions on MSDs and its consequences among adult workers with physical and sedentary work tasks , respectively . Methods We will search the following bibliographic data bases : PubMed ( including the data base ‘ MEDLINE ’ ) and Web of Science Core Collection ( including the data bases ‘ Science Citation Index Exp and ed ’ , ‘ Social Sciences Citation Index ’ and ‘ Arts & Humanities Citation Index ’ ) . Manual search es will also be performed . We will include r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) and non- RCTs reported in English in which ( 1 ) participants are adult workers with MSD , ( 2 ) interventions are aim ing at rehabilitating pain symptoms of MSD or preventing the consequences of MSD and ( 3 ) interventions are initiated and /or carried out at the workplace . The review will adhere to the ‘ Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review s and Meta-Analyses ’ ( PRISMA ) guidelines for reporting systematic review s and the Institute for Work and Health ( IWH ) guidelines for workplace-based interventions . For the primary evaluation of the review , the quality assessment and evidence synthesis will conform to the IWH guidelines . Secondary evaluation will include a meta- analysis ( unless the included studies do not allow this due to heterogeneity ) and employ the risk of bias domains recommended by Cochrane along with the Grading of Recommendations , Assessment , Development and Evaluations ( GRADE ) approach on the studies with pain intensity as an outcome . Discussion This systematic review will provide knowledge on effective workplace-based interventions among physical and sedentary workers with MSD . RCTs are considered the most powerful experimental design in clinical trials , but solely including these may be too restrictive to underst and effective workplace-based interventions where r and omised and carefully controlled trials ( RCTs ) are not always possible . In order to maximize practical relevance , the selection process will , therefore , include both RCTs and non- RCTs and the quality assessment and evidence synthesis will conform to IWH guidelines focusing on developing practical guidelines for stakeholders . The result of this work will form the basis for industry-specific evidence -based recommendations on effective workplace-based interventions for rehabilitation of MSDs and its consequences that will later be operationalised into concrete and user-friendly practical tools for workplaces . Systematic review registration International Prospect i ve Register of Systematic Review s ( PROSPERO ) number CRD42018116752 Background : Call centre work with computers is associated with increased rates of upper body pain and musculoskeletal disorders . Methods : This one year , r and omised controlled intervention trial evaluated the effects of a wide forearm support surface and a trackball on upper body pain severity and incident musculoskeletal disorders among 182 call centre operators at a large healthcare company . Participants were r and omised to receive ( 1  ) ergonomics training only , ( 2 ) training plus a trackball , ( 3 ) training plus a forearm support , or ( 4 ) training plus a trackball and forearm support . Outcome measures were weekly pain severity scores and diagnosis of incident musculoskeletal disorder in the upper extremities or the neck/shoulder region based on physical examination performed by a physician blinded to intervention . Analyses using Cox proportional hazard models and linear regression models adjusted for demographic factors , baseline pain levels , and psychosocial job factors . Results : Post-intervention , 63 participants were diagnosed with one or more incident musculoskeletal disorders  . Hazard rate ratios showed a protective effect of the armboard for neck/shoulder disorders ( HR = 0.49 , 95 % CI 0.24 to 0.97 ) after adjusting for baseline pain levels and demographic and psychosocial factors . The armboard also significantly reduced neck/shoulder pain ( p = 0.01 ) and right upper extremity pain ( p = 0.002 ) in comparison to the control group . A return-on-investment model predicted a full return of armboard and installation costs within 10.6 months . Conclusion : Providing a large forearm support combined with ergonomic training is an effective intervention to prevent upper body musculoskeletal disorders and reduce upper body pain associated with computer work among call centre employees OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the effect of an intensive ergonomic approach and education on workstation changes and  musculoskeletal disorders among workers who used a video display unit ( VDU ) . METHODS A r and omized controlled design was used . The subjects ( N=124 ) were allocated into three groups ( intensive ergonomics , ergonomic education , reference ) using stratified r and om sampling . The evaluation involved question naires , a diary of discomfort , measurements of workload , and an ergonomic rating of the workstations . The assessment s were made 2 weeks before the intervention and after 2 and 10 months of follow-up . RESULTS The intensive and training groups showed less musculoskeletal discomfort than the reference group after 2 months of follow-up . Positive effects on discomfort were seen primarily for the shoulder , neck , and upper back areas . No significant differences were found for the strain levels or prevalence of pain . After the intervention the ergonomic level was distinctly higher in the intensive ergonomic group than in the education or reference group . CONCLUSIONS Both the intensive ergonomics approach and education in ergonomics help reduce discomfort in VDU work . In attempts to improve the physical ergonomics of VDU workstations , the best result will be achieved with cooperative planning in which both workers and practitioners are actively involved BACKGROUND Chronic pain and disability of the arm , shoulder , and h and severely affect labor market participation . Ergonomic training and education is the default strategy to reduce physical exposure and thereby prevent aggravation of pain . An alternative strategy could be to increase physical capacity of the worker by physical conditioning . OBJECTIVES To investigate the effect of 2 contrasting interventions , conventional ergonomic training ( usual care ) versus resistance training , on pain and disability in individuals with upper limb chronic pain exposed to highly repetitive and forceful manual work . STUDY DESIGN Examiner-blinded , parallel-group r and omized controlled trial with allocation concealment . SETTING Slaughterhouses located in Denmark , Europe . METHODS Sixty-six adults with chronic pain in the shoulder , elbow/forearm , or h and /wrist and work disability were r and omly allocated to 10 weeks of specific resistance training for the shoulder , arm , and h and muscles for 3 x 10 minutes per week , or ergonomic training and education ( usual care control group ) .  Pain intensity ( average of shoulder , arm , and h and , scale 0 - 10 ) was the primary outcome , and disability ( Work module of DASH question naire ) as well as isometric shoulder and wrist muscle strength were secondary outcomes . RESULTS Pain intensity , disability , and muscle strength improved more following resistance training than usual care ( P < 0.001 , P = 0.05 , P < 0.0001 , respectively [ corrected ] ) . Pain intensity decreased by 1.5 points ( 95 % confidence interval -2.0 to -0.9 ) following resistance training compared with usual care , corresponding to an effect size of 0.91 ( Cohen 's d ) . LIMITATIONS Blinding of participants is not possible in behavioral interventions . However , at baseline outcome expectations of the 2 interventions were similar . CONCLUSION Resistance training at the workplace results in clinical relevant improvements in pain , disability , and muscle strength in adults with upper limb chronic pain exposed to highly repetitive and forceful manual work . TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01671267 Objective To investigate the association of physical and psychosocial risk factors with musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in New Zeal and nurses , postal workers and office workers . Design A cross-sectional postal survey asking about demographic , physical and psychosocial factors and MSDs . Participants A total of 911 participants was r and omly selected ; nurses from the Nursing Council of New Zeal and data base ( n=280 ) , postal workers from their employer 's data base ( n=280 ) and office workers from the 2005 electoral roll ( n=351 ) . Outcome Measures Self-reported pain in the low back , neck , shoulder , elbow , wrist/h and or knee lasting more than 1 day in the month before the survey . Results The response rate was 58 % , 443 from 770 potential participants . 70 % ( n=310 ) reported at least one MSDs . Physical work tasks were associated with low back ( odds ratio ( OR ) 1.35 , 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.6 ) , shoulder ( OR 1.41 , 95 % CI 1.17 to 1.69 ) , elbow ( OR 1.14 , 95 % CI 1.13 to 1.83 ) and wrist/h and pain ( OR 1.39 , 95 % CI 1.15 to 1.69 ) . Job strain had the strongest association with neck pain ( OR 3.46 , 95 % CI 1.30 to 9.21 ) and wrist/h and pain . Somatisation was weakly associated with MSDs at most sites . Better general and mental health status were weakly associated with lower odds of MSDs . Conclusions In injury prevention and rehabilitation the physical nature of the work needs to be addressed for most MSDs , with modest decreases in risk seemingly possible . Addressing job strain could provide significant benefit for those with neck and wrist/h and pain , while the effects of somatisation and the promotion of good mental health may provide smaller but global benefits
There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .