few_shots: 
Example 1:
Problem/activity:
Find the general solution for:
$${\mathrm{cos}\left({\pi\over2}+x\right)=\mathrm{tan}{\pi\over4}}$$


Concept/skill: 
Prove the addition and subtraction formulas for sine, cosine, and tangent and use them to solve problems.

Answer: 
Yes. An initial step when solving for x in this problem requires the use of the addition formula for cosine on the left side of the equation.

Example 2:
Problem/activity:
Task
Solve the quadratic equation
$$ x^2 = (2x - 9)^2 $$
using as many different methods as possible.


Concept/skill: 
Understand that the graph of an equation in two variables is the set of all its solutions plotted in the coordinate plane, often forming a curve (which could be a line).

Answer: 
No. This task does not involve an equation in two variables. There is only one variable, x.

Example 3:
Problem/activity:
Task
Suppose $A$ is an angle with vertex $P$, as pictured below:
[IMG]
Draw a circle with center $P$ and with  radius $r \gt 0$.  Explain why the circle
meets each ray of angle $A$ in a single point.  Label these points $Q$ and $R$ respectively.
Draw circles with centers $Q$ and $R$ respectively and radius $r$.  These circles meet at $P$ and a second point to be labelled $B$.
Show that ray $\overrightarrow{PB}$  bisects angle $P$.


Concept/skill: 
Construct a tangent line from a point outside a given circle to the circle.

Answer: 
No. This task does not involve drawing lines that are tangent to circles. The only line that may be drawn is the ray between points P and B.

Now, assess whether the following problem or activity is 'aligned' with the given Common Core standard in Mathematics.

shot_info: fl_problem_001894_pos_0

HS_0

im_task_000870_neg_0

HS_1

im_task_001160_neg_0

HS_2
standard_description: Use rational approximations of irrational numbers to compare the size of irrational numbers, locate them approximately on a number line diagram, and estimate the value of expressions (e.g., p^(2)). For example, by truncating the decimal expansion of Ö2, show that Ö2 is between 1 and 2, then between 1.4 and 1.5, and explain how to continue on to get better approximations.
problem_activity: Problem 1
Here are two algorithms for finding the value of 64 × 2.
|                                  Patrice’s method                                   |                                                                                                             Jerome’s method                                                                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| .. image:: https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at1a.png | |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at1b.png|  |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at1b.png| image:: https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at1b.png |
a.   How is Patrice’s method similar to and different from Jerome’s method?
b.   How do you think Jerome found the product 128?
Problem 2
Patrice solved the problem 813 × 7 using the partial products algorithm, as shown below:
[IMG]
Jerome solved in a different way from Patrice. Here is what he did:
|                      First, he found the partial product of 3 ones and 7, which is 21 ones, or 2 tens 1 one. He wrote the ones digit, 1, under the equal bar, and the 2 tens on the equal bar above the tens place in smaller handwriting.                      | Then, he found the partial product of 1 ten and 7, which was 7 tens. Because he had the 2 tens from the first partial product, he added those tens together and wrote 9 in the tens place in the product. Because he had accounted for the 2 tens from his first partial product, he crossed it off. |                                                  Finally, he found the partial product of 8 hundreds and 7, which was 56 tens. He wrote 56 in the hundreds and tens place in the product.                                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2b_bGxguvo.png|  |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2b_bGxguvo.png| image:: https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2b_bGxguvo.png |                               |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2c.png|  |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2c.png| image:: https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2c.png                                | |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2d.png| * *  |https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2d.png| image:: https://d21royfkw9g4l6.cloudfront.net/uploads/2021/08/26/4-2-10-at2d.png |
a.   How is Patrice's method similar to and different from Jerome's method?
b.   What are the advantages and disadvantages of Patrice's method? Of Jerome's method?
Problem 3
Try using the standard algorithm to solve. If you get stuck, use an area model and/or the partial products algorithm to help. Then assess the reasonableness of your answer.
a.
$$54\times6$$
b.
$$9\times673$$
c.
$$1,605\times4$$


aligns: no