few_shots: 
Example 1:
Problem/activity:
Task
Materials
One 10-frame per pair of students (see example below)
[IMG]
Counters, 10 per pair of students
Decks of number cards 0-5 (with 4 of each number) or two 0-5 dice
Setup
This activity is done in pairs. The students sit side by side with 10-frame and deck of cards or dice. If they have cards, the cards are shuffled and placed face down in front of them.
Action
Player 1 flips a card or rolls the die. They place that many counters on the 10-frame. Player 2 flips a card or rolls the die. They place that many more counters on the 10-frame next to the counters already on the ten frame. The students count the total together.
A recording sheet can be added when the students have been introduced to equations and number sentences. For those students who can handle higher numbers, a deck of 0-10 cards and two 10-frames can be used.
This game can also be played alone.


Concept/skill: 
Represent addition and subtraction with objects, fingers, mental images, drawings (Drawings need not show details, but should show the mathematics in the problem. (This applies wherever drawings are mentioned in the Standards.)), sounds (e.g., claps), acting out situations, verbal explanations, expressions, or equations.

Answer: 
Yes. This task involves representing addition with objects such as number cards and dice.

Example 2:
Problem/activity:
Task
 Arrange the fractions in order from least to greatest. Explain your answer with a picture.
 $\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{7}, \frac{1}{3} $
 $\frac{2}{5}, \frac{2}{7}, \frac{2}{3} $
 $\frac{5}{6}, \frac{3}{6}, \frac{1}{6} $
 $\frac{5}{12}, \frac{8}{12}, \frac{4}{12} $

Concept/skill: 
Explain equivalence of fractions in special cases, and compare fractions by reasoning about their size.
 Grade 3 expectations in this domain are limited to fractions with denominators 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8.

Answer: 
Yes. By arranging the fractions in this problem, students learn to compare fractions by reasoning about their size.

Example 3:
Problem/activity:
Problem 1
Solve using the standard algorithm. If you get stuck, use an area model and/or the partial products algorithm to help. Then assess the reasonableness of your answer.
a.
$$5,803\times46$$
b.
$$63\times2,116$$
Problem 2
Dunkin' introduced a croissant doughnut in 2014. In the first three months of its debut, they sold 7,870 dozen of them per day. How many croissant doughnuts were sold in the first three months?


Concept/skill: 
Fluently multiply multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm.

Answer: 
Yes. This set of problems involves multi-digit whole numbers because the numbers in each problem are four and two digit integers, and the mathematical calculations involved in both problems focus on multiplication. The first problem explicitly asks the student to solve its subproblems using the standard algorithm.

Now, assess whether the following problem or activity is 'aligned' with the given Common Core standard in Mathematics.

shot_info: im_task_001477_pos_0

K

im_task_000157_pos_0

3

fl_problem_000674_pos_0

5
standard_description: Recognize vector quantities as having both magnitude and direction. Represent vector quantities by directed line segments, and use appropriate symbols for vectors and their magnitudes (e.g., v, |v|, ||v||, v).
problem_activity: Activity
The purpose of this activity is for students to practice interpreting the solution of an inequality, especially those involving negative numbers. Students also practice representing inequalities written in natural language with symbols and number lines, and connecting the solution of an inequality with a number line. The work in this activity will be useful when students solve more complex inequalities in the associated Algebra 1 lesson.
Student Facing
Solve each inequality. Then, check your answer using a value that makes your solution true.
\(\text-2x<4\)
Solve the inequality.
Check your answer using a value that makes your solution true.
\(3x+5>6x-4\)
Solve the inequality.
Check your answer using a value that makes your solution true.
\(\text-3(x+1)\geq13\)
Solve the inequality.
Check your answer using a value that makes your solution true.
For each statement:
Use a number line to show which values satisfy the inequality.
Express the statement symbolically with an inequality.
The elevator can lift up to 1,200 pounds. Let
\(x\)
represent the weight being lifted by the elevator.
[IMG]
Over the course of the senator's term, her approval rating was always around 53% ranging 3% above or below that value. Let
\(x\)
represent the senator’s approval rating.
[IMG]
There's a minimum of 3 years of experience required. Let
\(x\)
represent the years of experience a candidate has.
[IMG]
Student Response
Teachers with a valid work email address can
click here to register or sign in
for free access to Student Response.
Activity Synthesis
The goal of this discussion is to help students make sense of their solutions. Here are questions for discussion:
"After you checked your answers using a value from your solution, did any of your answers change?" (Yes. Initially I thought the solution was
\(x <\text-2\)
, but I used
\(\text-3\)
to check my answer and realized it was incorrect. When I substituted
\(\text-3\)
for
\(x\)
in the original inequality, I got
\(6<4\)
which is not true. This reminds me to change the inequality symbol when I multiply or divide by a negative number.)
"Could the elevator hold 1,300 pounds?" (No. It holds
up to
1,200, so this is the largest amount the elevator can hold.)
"Could the senator’s approval rating be 54%?" (Yes. The situation says the approval rating can be 3 points above and below 53%, and 54% fits that requirement.)
"How can the number line be useful in writing the solution to an inequality?" (It helps to see which values are included in the solution and which are not. It can also be used to check your answer after you solve an inequality.)
"On the graph of the minimum years of experience for a candidate, does it make sense to have an upper bound? What examples can you think of that would make this situation have an upper bound?" (Yes, because realistically a person cannot have infinity years of experience and that is what the current graph of the inequality reprsents. For example, many people retire after a certain age, so it would be hard for someone to have more than 50 years of experience. Also, the average lifespan is about 110 and people ususally start working as teens or young adults, so this creates another limit on how many years of experience someone can actually have.)


aligns: no