few_shots: 
Example:
Concept/skill: 
Compare two decimals to hundredths by reasoning about their size. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two decimals refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with the symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual model.
Grade 4 expectations in this domain are limited to fractions with denominators 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 100.

Problem/activity:
Task
Cruz and Erica were both getting ready for soccer.
Cruz ran 1 lap around the school.
Erica ran 3 laps around the playground.
Erica said,
I ran more laps, so I ran farther.
Cruz said,
4 laps around the school is 1 mile, but it takes 12 laps around the playground to go 1 mile. My laps are much longer, so I ran farther.
Who is right? Draw a picture to help you explain your answer.


Answer: 
No. This task does not involve comparing decimals to hundredths. Instead, it involves fraction comparisons.

Now, assess whether the following problem or activity is 'aligned' with the given Common Core standard in Mathematics.

shot_info: im_task_000212_neg_0

4
standard_description: Add, subtract, multiply, and divide decimals to hundredths, using concrete models or drawings and strategies based on place value, properties of operations, and/or the relationship between addition and subtraction; relate the strategy to a written method and explain the reasoning used.
problem_activity: Narrative
The purpose of this activity is for students to analyze a common error when using the standard algorithm to subtract decimals. This activity is recommended if students need additional practice with the standard algorithm when the two numbers do not have the same number of decimal places. The standard addition algorithm requires students to subtract digits with the same place value. In the given example the two numbers are “right aligned” as when subtracting whole numbers and this leads to the error of subtracting hundredths from tenths, tenths from ones, and so on as if these digits had the same place value.
When students identify and correct Elena's error they construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (MP3).
This activity uses
MLR3 Clarify, Critique, and Correct
. Advances: Reading, Writing, Representing.
Launch
Groups of 2
Activity
1–2 minutes: quiet think time
6–8 minutes: partner work time
MLR3 Clarify, Critique, Correct
Display Elena’s solution and explanation.
Read the explanation aloud.
“What do you think Elena means? Is anything unclear?” (She says the answer will be less than 622.3, but she doesn’t say how much less. The answer will be a lot less than 615.21.)
“With your partner, work together to write a revised solution and explanation.”
(Optional) Display and review the following criteria:
Explanation of mistakes
Specific words and phrases
Decimal point
Place value
Labeled diagram
Correct solution
3–5 minutes: partner work time
Select 1–2 groups to share their revised explanation with the class.
“What is the same and different about the revised solutions and explanations?”
Student Facing
Find the value of
\(622.35 - 71.4\)
. Explain or show your reasoning.
Elena and Andre found the value of
\(622.35 - 71.4\)
. Who do you agree with? Explain or show your reasoning.
[IMG]
Student Response
Teachers with a valid work email address can
click here to register or sign in
for free access to Student Response.
Advancing Student Thinking
If a student does not have a strategy to solve problem 1, ask them to explain how they would find the value of
\(622 - 51\)
.
Activity Synthesis
Display Andre’s solution and explanation.
“Why do you think Andre wrote 71.40 instead of 72.4?” (It helps him keep the place values and decimals in line so he doesn’t mix up the places when he is subtracting. 71.40 is equivalent to 71.4.)
Display Elena’s solution.
“How can you see without finding the difference that Elena’s answer is not correct?” (Taking 71 away from 622 is a lot less than 615.
\(620-70=550\)
so the answer should be around 550.)


aligns: yes