few_shots: 
Example:
Problem/activity:
Task
 Arrange the fractions in order from least to greatest. Explain your answer with a picture.
 $\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{7}, \frac{1}{3} $
 $\frac{2}{5}, \frac{2}{7}, \frac{2}{3} $
 $\frac{5}{6}, \frac{3}{6}, \frac{1}{6} $
 $\frac{5}{12}, \frac{8}{12}, \frac{4}{12} $

Concept/skill: 
Explain equivalence of fractions in special cases, and compare fractions by reasoning about their size.
 Grade 3 expectations in this domain are limited to fractions with denominators 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8.

Answer: 
Yes. By arranging the fractions in this problem, students learn to compare fractions by reasoning about their size.

Now, does the problem or activity shown below enable students to learn the full intent of the following concept or skill?

shot_info: im_task_000157_pos_0

3
standard_description: Use place value understanding to round decimals to any place.
problem_activity: Problem 1
Act 1: Watch the following video –
The Big Pad (Act: 1)
a.   What do you notice? What do you wonder?
b.   What is the area, in square centimeters, of the big pad? Make an estimate.
Problem 2
Act 2: Use the following information to solve -
The small pad is a square with a length of
$$7\frac{3}{5}$$
cm.
The big pad is also a square and has a length equal to
$$3\frac{2}{3}$$
small pads.
Problem 3
Act 3: Reveal the answer -
The area of the big pad is
$$776\frac{124}{225}$$
square centimeters. Was your answer reasonable? Why or why not?
Problem 4
Act 4 (the sequel): Look at the following image of the dimensions mentioned on the big pad -
[IMG]
Do these dimensions result in the same area as what we computed in Anchor Task #3? Why or why not?


aligns: no