COMPARISON OF RUBELLA IMMUNOASSAYS in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoas- say for detection of rubella virus antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 21:793-795, 1985. 14. Cremer NE, Hagens SJ, Cossen C: Comparison of the hemagglutination inhibition test and an indirect fluores- cent-antibody test for detection of antibody to rubella vi- rus in human sera. J Clin Microbiol 11:746-747, 1980. 15. Zartarian MV, Friedly G, Peterson EM, de la Maza LM: Detection of rubella antibodies by hemagglutination inhibition, indirect fluorescent-antibody test, and enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 14:640- 645, 1981. 16. Abbott GG, Safford JW, MacDonald RG, Craine MC, Applegren RR: Development of automated immunoassays for immune status screening and serodiagnosis of rubella virus infection. J Virol Methods 27:227-240, 1990. SA UTTER ET AL. 17. Hossain A, Ramia S, Bakir TMF: Comparison of he- magglutination test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect immunofluorescence antibody test for deter- mination of rubella immune status. J Trop Med Hyg 91:216-221, 1988. 18. Schaefer LE, Dyke JW, Meglio FD, Murray PR, Crafts W, Niles AC: Evaluation of microparticle enzyme im- munoassays for immunoglobulins G and M to rubella virus and Toxoplasma gondii on the Abbott IMx automated analyzer. J Clin Microbiol 27:2410-2413, 1989. 19. Skurrie IJ, Head IL, Garland SM: Detection of rubella- specific immunoglobulin G: Comparison of the enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay and an automated micropar- ticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx). J Clin Microbiol 29: 1752-1753, 1991. 20. Rubella prevention. MMWR 30:37-47, 1981. INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY