204 Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the skilful and enthusiastic collection of the patients’ data by Dr. Wibke Kno¨ner. Conﬂict of interest The authors declare no conﬂict of interest. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which per- mits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. References 1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Grifﬁths D, Rosier P, Ulmstein U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178 2. Barry MJ, Cockett AT, Holtgrewe HL, McConnell JD, Sihelnik SA, Winﬁeld HN (1993) Relationship of symptoms of prostatism to commonly used physiological and anatomical measures of the severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 150:351–358 3. Bosch JL, Kranse R, van Mastrigt R, Schro¨der FH (1995) Rea- sons for the weak correlation between prostate volume and ure- thral resistance parameters in patients with prostatism. J Urol 153:689–693 4. Rosier PF, de la Rosette JJ (1995) Is there a correlation between prostate size and bladder-outlet obstruction? World J Urol 13:9–13 5. Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Guess HA, Oesterling JE, Chute CG, Panser LA, Lieber MM (1995) Natural history of prostatism: relationship among symptoms, prostate volume and peak urinary ﬂow rate. J Urol 153:1510–1515 6. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL (1984) The devel- opment of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol 132:474–479 7. Fenter TC, Naslund MJ, Shab MB, Eaddy MT, Black T (2006) The cost of treating the 10 most prevalent diseases in men 50 years of age or older. Am J Manag Care 4(Suppl):S90–S98 8. Doubilet P, McNeil BJ, Van Houten FX, Berenberg A, Ratnofsky S, Greenes RA, Anderson JW, Mellins HZ, Abrams HL (1985) Excretory urography in current practice: evidence against over- utilization. Radiology 154:607–611 9. Wasserman NF, Lapointe S, Eckmann DR, Rosel PR (1987) Assessment of prostatism: role of intravenous urography. Radi- ology 165:831–835 10. Stavropoulos N, Christodoulou K, Chamilos E, Karidis G, Ka- ragiotas N, Yiannopoulos P (1988) Evaluation of patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy: IVU versus ultrasound. J R Coll Surg Edinb 33:140–142 11. Wilkinson AG, Wild SR (1992) Is pre-operative imaging of the urinary tract worthwhile in the assessment of prostatism? Br J Urol 70:53–57 123 World J Urol (2011) 29:199–204 12. Scha¨fer W (1995) Analysis of bladder-outlet function with the linearized passive urethral resistance relation, lin-PURR, and a disease-speciﬁc approach for grading obstruction: from complex to simple. World J Urol 13:47–58 13. Mulligan ME (1997) Classic radiological signs: an atlas and history, 1st edition. Informa healthcare, New York, London 14. Patel M, Tewari A, Furman J (2000) Prostatic obstruction and effects on the urinary tract. In: Narayan P (ed) Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Churchill livingstone, London, Edinburgh, New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto, pp 139–149 15. Abdel Razzak OM (2007) Ureteral anatomy. In: Smith AD, Badlani G, Bagley D, Clayman RV, Docimo SG, Jordan GH, Kavoussi CR, Lee BR, Lingerman JE, Preminger GM, Segura JW (eds) Smith’s textbook of endourology, 2nd edn. BC Decker Inc, Hamilton, pp 213–216 16. Grifﬁths HJ (1969) Enlargement of the prostate gland. Br J Radiol 42:793 17. Costas S, Cohen IT, Van Blerk PJ (1972) Benign prostatic enlargement and the ﬁsh-hook sign of the ureter. S Afr Med J 46:1721–1723 18. Douenias R, Rich M, Badlani G, Mazor D, Smith A (1991) Predisposing factors in bladder calculi. Review of 100 cases. Urology 37:240–243 19. Chia SJ, Heng CT, Chan SP, Foo KT (2003) Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 91:371–374 20. Lim KB, Ho H, Foo KT, Wong MY, Fook-Chong S (2006) Comparison of intravesical prostatic protrusion, prostate volume and serum prostatic-speciﬁc antigen in the evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction. Int J Urol 13:1509–1513 21. Oelke M, Ho¨fner K, Wiese B, Gru¨newald V, Jonas U (2002) Increase in detrusor wall thickness indicates bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in men. World J Urol 19:443–452 22. Oelke M, Ho¨fner K, Jonas U, de la Rosette JJ, Ubbink DT, Wi- jkstra H (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests to evaluate bladder outlet obstruction in men: detrusor wall thick- ness, uroﬂowmetry, postvoid residual urine, and prostate volume. Eur Urol 52:827–835 23. el Din KE, de Wildt MJ, Rosier PF, Wijkstra H, Debruyne FM, de la Rosette JJ (1996) The correlation between urodynamic and cystoscopic ﬁndings in elderly men with voiding complaints. J Urol 155:1018–1022 24. Madersbacher S, Pycha A, Klingler CH, Mian C, Djavan B, Stulnig T, Marberger M (1999) Interrelationships of bladder compliance with age, detrusor instability, and obstruction in elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourol Uro- dyn 18:3–15 25. Comiter CV, Sullivan MP, Schacterle RS, Cohen LH, Yalla SV (1997) Urodynamic risk factors for renal dysfunction in men with obstructive and nonobstructive voiding dysfunction. J Urol 158:181–185