Eur Radiol (2012) 22:1271–1277 Acknowledgements This study was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Heart Foundation [Grant number 2009B014]. We thank Aron de Vries and Jacob Gebreegziabeher for their help with the image analysis. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Crea- tive Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. References 1. Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y, Fu YC, Wang CC, Hsieh SR, Wei HJ, Tsai HW, Jan SL, Wang KY, Chen MC, Chen CC (2009) Correct- ness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative find- ings as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 19:857–867 2. Symersky P, Budde RPJ, de Mol BAJM, Prokop M (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128–1134 3. Konen E, Goitein O, Feinberg MS, Eshet Y, Raanani E, Rimon U, Di-Segni E (2008) The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 191:26–31 4. Habets J, Budde RP, Symersky P, van den Brink RB, de Mol BA, Mali WP, van Herwerden LA, Chamuleau SA (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart dysfunction. Nat Rev Cardiol 8:466–478 5. Girard SE, Miller FA, Orszulak TA, Mullany CJ, Montgomery S, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD, Malouf JF, Tajik AJ (2001) Reoper- ation for prosthetic aortic valve obstruction in the era of echocar- diography: trends in diagnostic testing and comparison with surgical findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:579–584 6. Faletra F, Constantin C, De Chiara F, Masciocco G, Santambrogio G, Moreo A, Alberti A, Vitali E, Pellegrini A (2000) Incorrect echocardiographic diagnosis in patients with mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction: correlation with surgical findings. Am J Med 108:531–537 7. Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Coche E, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL (2010) Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with trans- thoracic echocardiography. Radiology 255:377–385 1277 8. Teshima H, Hayashida N, Fukunaga S, Tayama E, Kawara T, Aoyagi S, Uchida M (2004) Usefulness of a multidetector-row computed tomography scanner for detecting pannus formation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:523–526 9. Toledano D, Acar C (2010) Usefulness of computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis of aortic prosthetic valve pannus. J Heart Valve Dis 19:665–668 10. Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Prokop M, de Mol BA (2011) Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 20:216–222 11. Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA, de Mol BA, Spijkerboer AM, Mali WP, Budde RP (2011) Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT; imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 21:1390–1396 12. Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Westers P, de Mol BAJM, Prokop M (2011) Multidetector CT imaging of mechanical prosthetic heart valves: quantification of artifacts with a pulsatile in-vitro model. Eur Radiol 21:2103–2110 13. van der Schaaf I, van Leeuwen M, Vlassenbroek A, Velthuis B (2006) Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography in clipped patients. Am J Neuroradiol 27:60–66 14. Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2011) Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology 259:894–902 15. De Man B, Nuyts J, Dupont P, Marchal G, Suetens P (1999) Metal streak artifacts in x-ray computed tomography: a simulation study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 46:691–696 16. Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Kitagawa T, Kohno S, Ito K (2009) Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140- kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG- gated helical CT. Eur Radiol 19:2363–2372 17. Prokop M (2003) Principles of CT, spiral CT and multislice CT. In: Prokop M, Galanski M (eds) Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. Thieme Verlag, New York, pp 1–43 18. Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24:1679–1691 19. Wilting JE, Timmer J (1999) Artefacts in spiral-CT images and their relation to pitch and subject morphology. Eur Radiol 9:316–322 20. Yang WJ, Pan ZL, Zhang H, Pang LF, Guo Y, Chen KM (2011) Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study. Radiol Med 116:189–196 21. Cho YH, Jeong DS, Park PW, Park KH, Sung K, Kim WS, Lee YT (2011) Serial changes of hemodynamic performance with Med- tronic Hall valve in the aortic position. Ann Thor Surg 91:424–431