10 [51] D. C. Miller, B. K. Hollenbeck, G. D. Smith, et al., “Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination,” Urology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 497–501, 2002. [52] U. Berg, C. Brucker, and F. D. Berg, “Eﬀect of motile sperm count after swim-up on outcome of intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 747– 750, 1997. [53] T. F. Kruger, A. A. Acosta, K. F. Simmons, R. J. Swanson, J. F. Matta, and S. Oehninger, “Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 112–117, 1988. [54] R. K.-K. Lee, J.-W. Hou, H.-Y. Ho, et al., “Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauter- ine insemination,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 277–280, 2002. [55] R. Hauser, L. Yogev, A. Botchan, J. B. Lessing, G. Paz, and H. Yavetz, “Intrauterine insemination in male factor subfertility: signiﬁcance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria,” Andrologia, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2001. [56] M. Montanaro Gauci, T. F. Kruger, K. Coetzee, K. Smith, J. P. van der Merwe, and C. J. Lombard, “Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme,” Andrologia, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 135–141, 2001. [57] R. P. Dickey, R. Pyrzak, P. Y. Lu, S. N. Taylor, and P. H. Rye, “Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 684–689, 1999. [58] D. T. Carrell, P. H. Kuneck, C. M. Peterson, H. H. Hatasaka, K. P. Jones, and B. F. Campbell, “A randomized, prospective analysis of ﬁve sperm preparation techniques before intrauter- ine insemination of husband sperm,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 122–126, 1998. [59] W. C. Dodson, J. Moessner, J. Miller, R. S. Legro, and C. L. Gnatuk, “A randomized comparison of the methods of sperm preparation for intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 574–575, 1998. [60] M. Morshedi, H. E. Duran, S. Taylor, and S. Oehninger, “Eﬃcacy and pregnancy outcome of two methods of semen preparation for intrauterine insemination: a prospective ran- domized study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 79, supplement 3, pp. 1625–1632, 2003. [61] L. Xu, R.-K. Lu, L. Chen, and Y.-L. Zheng, “Comparative study on eﬃcacy of three sperm-separation techniques,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131–134, 2000. [62] S.-S. Ren, G.-H. Sun, C.-H. Ku, D.-C. Chen, and G.-J. Wu, “Comparison of four methods for sperm preparation for IUI,” Archives of Andrology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 139–143, 2004. [63] C. M. Boomsma, M. J. Heineman, B. J. Cohlen, and C. Farquhar, “Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD004507, pp. 1–29, 2007. [64] Y. Yavas and M. R. Selub, “Intrauterine insemination (IUI) pregnancy outcome is enhanced by shorter intervals from semen collection to sperm wash, from sperm wash to IUI time, and from semen collection to IUI time,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1638–1647, 2004. [65] J. P. Royston, “Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg,” Biometrics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 397–406, 1982. [66] World Health Organization, “Temporal relationships between ovulation and deﬁned changes in the concentration of plasma Obstetrics and Gynecology International estradiol-17β, luteinizing hormone, follicle, stimulating hor- mone and progesterone,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 138, no. 4, pp. 383–390, 1980. [67] M. L. Taymor, M. M. Seibel, D. Smith, and L. Levesque, “Ovulation timing by luteinizing hormone assay and follicle puncture,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 191– 195, 1983. [68] R. G. Edwards and P. C. Steptoe, “Control of human ovulation, fertilization and implantation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 932–936, 1974. [69] J. Testart and R. Frydman, “Minimum time lapse between luteinizing hormone surge or human chorionic gonadotropin administration and follicular rupture,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 50–53, 1982. [70] K. W. Fuh, X. Wang, A. Tai, I. Wong, and R. J. Norman, “Intrauterine insemination: eﬀect of the temporal relationship between the luteinizing hormone surge, human chorionic gonadotrophin administration and insemination on preg- nancy rates,” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2162– 2166, 1997. [71] K. M. Silverberg, J. V. Johnson, D. L. Olive, W. N. Burns, and R. S. Schenken, “A prospective, randomized trial comparing two diﬀerent intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 357–361, 1992. [72] G. Ragni, P. Maggioni, E. Guermandi, et al., “Eﬃcacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyper- stimulation cycles,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 619–622, 1999. [73] J. L. Pryor, P. H. Kuneck, S. M. Blatz, C. Thorp, C. E. Cornwell, and D. T. Carrell, “Delayed timing of intrauterine insemination results in a signiﬁcantly improved pregnancy rate in female partners of quadriplegic men,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1130–1135, 2001. [74] P. Claman, V. Wilkie, and D. Collins, “Timing intrauterine insemination either 33 or 39 hours after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin yields the same pregnancy rates as after superovulation therapy,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2004. [75] L. Speroﬀ and M. A. Fritz, “Male infertility,” in Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility, L. Speroﬀ and M. A. Fritz, Eds., pp. 1135–1173, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2005. [76] I. P. Kosmas, A. Tatsioni, H. M. Fatemi, E. M. Kolibianakis, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey, “Human chorionic gonadotropin administration vs. luteinizing monitoring for intrauterine insemination timing, after administration of clomiphene citrate: a meta-analysis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 607–612, 2007. [77] M. X. Ransom, M. B. Blotner, M. Bohrer, G. Corsan, and E. Kemmann, “Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates signiﬁcantly during superovulation cycles?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 303–307, 1994. [78] S. Alborzi, S. Motazedian, M. E. Parsanezhad, and S. Jannati, “Comparison of the eﬀectiveness of single intrauterine insem- ination (IUI) versus double IUI per cycle in infertile patients,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 595–599, 2003. [79] L. Casadei, V. Zamaro, M. Calcagni, C. Ticconi, M. Dorrucci, and E. Piccione, “Homologous intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a comparison among three diﬀerent regimens,” European Journal of Obstet- rics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 155–161, 2006.