Amy L. Fielden et al. letter and, in addition, received a phone call from the school’s community liaison officer to ensure that parents fully understood the nature of the study because the researcher was aware that for some parents English was not their first language. The phone calls were made in their mother tongue thus allowing the parents to sign the parental assent form with all their queries being answered. Participants were also asked for their verbal assent on the day prior to the study taking place. Procedure The study had received ethical approval from North- umbria University’s School of Psychology and Sports Science Ethics Board prior to commencing. The researcher had also been approved by means of an enhanced criminal records background check clearing her to work with children; this approval was required by both the school and the university. The focus groups all took place in the same quiet room at the school and were conducted by the principal investigator (referred to herein as the researcher). On arrival, the researcher introduced herself and provided name badges for the partici- pants. The researcher briefly explained to the participants that she was there to talk to them about food and exercise. The researcher also explained to the participants that she wanted them to assume that she knew nothing, they were not being tested, and she was only interested in hearing what they had to say*not whether they were right or wrong. Verbal instructions were provided to the participants and they provided verbal assent prior to the recording commencing. A series of questions were developed by the research team, these were designed to keep the focus group sessions on track whilst exploring issues relevant to the research question. The sessions started initially with a discussion centred on the replica food items laid out on the table. Participants were asked to use the replica food and pick out healthy foods and make what they thought would be a healthy lunch. They were asked to explain why it was healthy and what made it healthy. Participants were then asked about foods they liked and why they liked them. In addition, they were asked about the sorts of things they normally ate at home and in school and things they liked to eat. Once conversa- tion had dwindled concerning the replica food the researcher introduced the laminated picture cards, and the discussion moved to physical activity with the researcher encouraging the participants to explore the relationship between diet and exercise. Questions focussed on what activities they thought were healthy (as the images depicted activities that were both physical and sedentary; that is, one image of somebody running another of somebody playing computer games). The participants were asked about what sorts of activities they liked doing and what made those activities good for them. They were asked what activities they regularly engaged with, the sorts of sports their parents and siblings took part in, and the activities they did as families. The themes of discussion were encouraged around the two ele- ments pertinent to any strategy looking to reduce obesity: healthy eating and physical activity. Further- more, questions also probed at what the participants thought the benefits were of following a healthy lifestyle and what the consequences were of not following one. They were also asked what advice they would give somebody who wanted to be healthier and how important it was to them to be healthy. The focus group guide was intended to provide a structure but not rigidly dictate the line of questioning. The researcher included prompts and encouraged participants to expand on their initial responses and followed up on notions that the participants raised themselves. The sessions on the first day lasted between 20 and 30 min, ending when the participants input was insufficient to continue. At the end of each session the researcher read out the participant debrief and provided each participant with a parental debrief information sheet to take home. In order to strengthen the analysis process and gather the most appropriate data, the researchers reviewed the recording made on the first day and reflected on the procedures employed in the focus groups. Similar approaches of reviewing data to informing further data collection are used in meth- ods such as grounded theory and it was felt that doing so would strengthen the current study. The decision was made not to use the props (replica food and cards) used on the first day in the second round of focus groups, as at times they had proved to be a distraction to the participants. As an alternative, Reception children were given colouring pens and paper to focus their attention. Year 6 focus groups were run again allowing for free discussion, following on from issues and understandings they had raised in the initial session. The second round of focus groups, other than the changes already detailed above, followed the same sequence as they had on day one and lasted around 30 min. The recordings were transcribed combining the recordings from both days creating four transcripts, one for each group. Data analysis The data collected from all the focus groups was transcribed by the principal investigator, during this 4 (page number not for citation purpose) Citation: Int J Qualitative Stud Health Well-being 2011; 6: 7170 - DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v6i3.7170