Burgess JL. 2007. Editorial on “exposure assessment of a mercury spill in a Nevada school—2004.” Clin Toxicol (Phila) 45(4):431. Caravati EM, Erdman AR, Christianson G, Nelson LS, Woolf AD, Booze LL, et al. 2008. Elemental mercury exposure: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 46(1):1–21. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2004. Preventing Lead Exposure in Young Children: A Housing- Based Approach to Primary Prevention of Lead Poisoning. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/publications/ Primary%20Prevention%20Document.pdf [accessed 17 July 2008]. Pediatr 3(1):24–26. folk practice in northern New Jersey, USA. Ethn Health 11(3):287–306. Orloff KG, Ulirsch G, Wilder L, Block A, Fagliano J, Pasqualo J. 1997. Human exposure to elemental mercury in a contami- nated residential building. Arch Environ Health 52(3):169–172. Ozuah PO, Lesser MS, Woods JS, Choi H, Markowitz M. 2003. Mercury exposure in an urban pediatric population. Ambul Putman J, Madden R. 1972. Quicksilver and slow death. Natl Geogr Mag 142(4):506–527. Rennie AC, McGregor-Schuerman M, Dale IM, Robinson C, McWilliam R. 1999. Mercury poisoning after spillage at home from a sphygmomanometer on loan from hospital. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2005a. BMJ 319(7206):366–367. Measuring exposure to an elemental mercury spill— Dakota County, Minnesota, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54(6):146–149. Rogers HS, Jeffery N, Kieszak S, Fritz P, Spliethoff H, Palmer CD, et al. 2008. Mercury exposure in young children living in New York City. J Urban Health 85(1):39–51. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2005b. Rogers HS, McCullough J, Kieszak S, Caldwell KL, Jones RL, mercury poisoning in a family of seven. Fam Community Taueg C, Sanfilippo DJ, Rowens B, Szejda J, Hesse JL. 1992. Mercury exposure—Kentucky, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54(32):797–799. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2005c. Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/ pdf/thirdreport.pdf [accessed 20 March 2008]. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2007. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Available: http:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm [accessed 28 January 2008]. Cherry D, Lowry L, Velez L, Cotrell C, Keyes DC. 2002. Elemental Health 24(4):1–8. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. 1980. Public Law 96-510. Amended 1983 (Public Law 98-802) and 1986 (Public Law 99-499). DeRouen TA, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Townes BD, Woods JS, Leitao J, et al. 2006. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 295(15):1784–1792. Gattineni J, Weiser S, Becker AM, Baum M. 2007. Mercury intoxication: lack of correlation between symptoms and levels. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 46(9):844–846. Rubin C. 2007. Exposure assessment of young children living in Chicago communities with historic reports of ritu- alistic use of mercury. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 45(3):240–247. Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001. 2001. Public Law 107-118. Smart ER. 1986. Mercury vapor levels in a domestic environ- ment following breakage of a clinical thermometer. Sci Total Environ 57:99–103. Solis MT, Yuen E, Cortez PS, Goebel PJ. 2000. Family poisoned by mercury vapor inhalation. Am J Emerg Med 18(5):599–602. Acute and chronic poisoning from residential exposures to elemental mercury—Michigan, 1989–1990. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 30(1):63–67. Thomson Reuters. 2008. Web of Science. Available: http:// thomsonreuters.com/products_services/scientific/Web_ of_Science [accessed 15 February 2008]. Tominack R, Weber J, Blume C, Madhok M, Murphy T, Thompson M, et al. 2002. Elemental mercury as an attrac- tive nuisance: multiple exposures from a pilfered school supply with severe consequences. Pediatr Emerg Care 18(2):97–100. Lee et al. followu­p of persons exposed to larger spills or releases are needed. This kind of followu­p requires enhanced coordination between environmental respond­ ers (e.g., U.S. EPA, U.S. Coast Guard National Response Center) and collectors and providers of exposure and health outcome information (e.g., AAPCC, ATSDR, CDC). Better coor­ dination would increase the effectiveness of existing surveillance mechanisms by assem­ bling more information on factors that can affect exposure level, such as the amount spilled, temperature, air flow, room volume and ventilation, exposure duration, exposure measuring instruments, methodology used to measure exposure, and types of cleanup methods employed. This information would then assist in interpreting the health impact of individual exposures, along with longitu­ dinal clinical and laboratory data. With this information, federal and state health agencies can increase their understanding of children’s elemental mercury exposures and respond appropriately to this public health hazard. Ref Rencs AOEC (Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics). 2006. Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Units. Available: http://www.aoec.org/PEHSU.htm [accessed 1 January 2008]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1999. Toxicological Profile for Mercury. Available: http:// www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp46.pdf [accessed 3 December 2007]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2001. Health Consultation: West Grand Boulevard Mercury Spill.Available:http://www.michigan.gov/documents/West_ Grand_Blvd_(Blood_Pressure_Instrument)_102584_7.pdf [accessed 1 May 2008]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2003. Health Consultation: Mercury Exposures from 3M Tartan Brand Floors—Westerville Schools, Westerville, Franklin County, Ohio. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc. gov/HAC/PHA/westerville/wes_toc.html [accessed 3 December 2007]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2004. Health Consultation: Mid-Michigan Mercury Floor, Middleton, Gratiot County, Michigan. Available: http:// www.michigan.gov/documents/Middleton_(mercury_in_ flooring)_102577_7.pdf [accessed 3 December 2007]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2007a. Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HS/ HSEES [accessed 12 October 2007]. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2007b. Health Consultation: Mercury Exposure Investigation Using Serial Urine Testing and Medical Records Review, Kiddie Kollege. Available: http://www.state.nj.us/health/ eoh/cehsweb/kiddiekollege/documents/kiddiekollegehc. pdf [accessed 3 December 2007]. Azziz-Baumgartner E, Luber G, Schurz-Rogers H, Backer L, Belson M, Kieszak S, et al. 2007. Exposure assessment of a mercury spill in a Nevada school—2004. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 45(4):391–395. Baughman TA. 2006. Elemental mercury spills. Environ Health Perspect 114:147–152. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, et al. 2006. Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 295(15):1775–1783. Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR Jr, Green J, Rumack BH, Heard SE. 2007. 2006 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS). Clin Toxicol (Phila) 45(8):815–917. 878 Gordon AT. 2004. Short-term elemental mercury exposures U.S. Coast Guard National Response Center. 2002. National at three Arizona schools: public health lessons learned. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 42(2):179–187. Response Center Database. Available: http://www.nrc. uscg.mil/nrcback.html [accessed 1 January 2008]. Hryhorczuk D, Persky V, Piorkowski J, Davis J, Moomey CM, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Healthy Krantz A, et al. 2006. Residential mercury spills from gas regulators. Environ Health Perspect 114:848–852. Hursh JB, Clarkson TW, Miles EF, Goldsmith LA. 1989. People 2010. Chapter 8: Environmental Health, Section 8.25. Available: http://www.healthypeople.gov/Document/ HTML/Volume1/08Environmental.htm#_Toc470929247 Percutaneous absorption of mercury vapor by man. Arch [accessed 25 September 2008]. Environ Health 44(2):120–127. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Illinois Department of Public Health. 2008. Teaching, Learning, Designation of Hazardous Substances. 40 CFR 302.4. Knowing the Facts about Mercury in Schools. Available: http://app.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/mercury/Default.htm [accessed 12 December 2008]. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1994. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. 40 CFR 300. Interstate Mercury Education and Reduction Clearinghouse. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Task 2008]. 2008. 11 Percent Reduction in Mercury Use in Products in the U.S. from 2001 to 2004, according to IMERC/NEWMOA Report. Available: http://www.newmoa.org/prevention/ m e r c u r y / i m e r c / f a c t s h e e t s / m e r c u r y i n p r o d u c t s _ pressrelease.doc [accessed 8 July 2008]. John Snow Inc. 2003. Ritual Use of Mercury (Azogue) Assessment and Education Project. Available: http:// www.jsi.com/Managed/Docs/Publications/EnviroHealth/ MercuryAssessment_Report.pdf [accessed 11 February Johnson C. 1999. Elemental mercury use in religious and ritual- istic practices in Latin American and Caribbean communi- ties in New York. Popul Environ 20(5):443–453. Johnson CL. 2004. Mercury in the environment: sources, toxici- ties, and prevention of exposure. Pediatr Ann 33(7):437–442. Lowry LK, Rountree PP, Levin JL, Collins S, Anger WK. 1999. The Texarkana mercury incident. Tex Med 95(10):65–70. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. 2007. Mercury P2: Mercury Pollution Prevention. Available: http://www. michigan.gov/deq/0,1607,7-135-3307_29693_4175---,00.html [accessed 10 December 2007]. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 2006. Minnesota’s Mercury Initiative. Available: http://proteus.pca.state.mn.us/air/ mercury-mn.html#initiative [accessed 10 December 2007]. 15 February 2008]. Newby AC, Riley DM, Leal-Almeraz TO. 2006. Mercury use and exposure among Santeria practitioners: religious versus Force on Ritualistic Uses of Mercury Report. Available: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/pdfs/mercury. pdf [accessed 26 June 2008]. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2008. State Legislation and Regulations. Available: http://www.epa. gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/mercury/laws.htm [accessed 1 January 2008]. von Muhlendahl KE. 1990. Intoxication from mercury spilled on carpets. Lancet 336(8730):1578. Wendroff AP. 2005. Magico-religious mercury use in Caribbean and Latino communities: pollution, persistence, and poli- tics. Environ Pract 7:87–96. WHO (World Health Organization). 1991. Environmental Health Criteria 118: Inorganic Mercury. Available: http://www. inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc118.htm [accessed 6 December 2007]. WHO (World Health Organization). 2003. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 50—Elemental M e r c u r y a n d I n o r g a n i c M e r c u r y C o m p o u n d s : Human Health Aspects. Geneva, Switzerland:Inter- organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals, International Program on Chemical Safety. Available: http://www.who.int/ipcs/ publications/ cicad/en/cicad50.pdf [accessed 11 January 2008]. National Library of Medicine. 2008. PubMed. Available: http:// Zayas LH, Ozuah PO. 1996. Mercury use in Espiritismo: a survey www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed [accessed of botanicas. Am J Public Health 86(1):111–112. ovlume 117 | number 6 | June 2009 • Environmental Health Perspectives