Review Article References: 1. Prvulovich EM, Bomanji JB: The role of nuclear medicine in clinical investigation. BMJ, 1998, 316: 1140–46 2. DePuey GE: New Applications of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, Tex Heart Inst J, 1996; 23(2): 122–27 3. Dziuk M: Cardiac tomographic studies for the risk assessment In coronary artery disease. Pol Merkuriusz Lekarski, 2005; 18(108): 611–16 4. El-Ali HH, Palmer J et al: Comparison of 1- and 2-day protocols for myocardial SPECT: a Monte Carlo study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2005; 25: 189–95 5. Groch MW, Erwin WD: SPECT in the year 2000: Basic principles. J Nuclear Med Technol, 2000; 28: 233–44 6. Skoufis E, McGhie I: Radionuclide Techniques for the assessment of Myocardial Viability. Tex Heart Inst J, 1998; 25(4): 272–79 7. Lebowitz E, Greene MW et al: Thallium-201 for medical use. J Nuclear Med, 1975; 16: 151–55 8. Rigo P, Meyers A et al: Myocardial imaging with 99mTc-MIBI a potential thallium sub-stitute. Nucl Med, 1986; 25: 46 9. Mauderli W, Luthmann RW: A computerized Rotating Laminar Radionuclide Camera. J Nuclear Med, 1979; 20: 341–44 10. Comton A: A quantum theory of the scattering of X-rays by lights elements. The Physical Review, 1923; 21: 483–502 11. Anger HO: Scintillation Camera. Rev Scientific Instruments, 1958; 29: 27–33 12. Tamaki N, Mukai T et al: Comparative study of thallium emission myocardial tomography with 180° and 360° data collection. J Nuclear Med, 1982; 23: 661–66 13. Coleman RE, Jaszczak RJ, Cobb FR: Comparison of 180° and 360° data collection in thal-lium-201 imaging using single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT). J Nuclear Med, 1982; 23: 655–60 14. Maublant JC, Peycelon P et al: Comparison Between 180° and 360° Data Collection in Technetium-99m MIBI SPECT of the Myocardium. J Nuclear Med, 1989; 30: 295–300 © Pol J Radiol, 2011; 76(3): 49-52 15. Go RT, MacIntyre WJ: Clinical Evaluation of 360° and 180° Data Sampling Techniques for Transaxial SPECT Thallium-201 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Nuclear Med, 1985; 26: 695–706 16. LaCroix KJ, Tsui BW: A Comparison of 180° and 360° Acquisition for Attenuation-Compensated Thallium-201 SPECT Images. J Nuclear Med, 1998; 39: 562–74 17. Bruyant PP: Analytic and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms in SPECT. J Nuclear Med, 2002; 43: 1343–58 18. Madsen MT, Park CH: Enhancement of SPECT Images by Fourier Filtering the Projection Image Set. J Nuclear Med, 1985; 26: 395–402 19. LaCroix KJ, Tsui BMW et al: Receiver Operating Characteristic Evaluation of Iterative Reconstruction with Attenuation Correction in Tc-99m-Sestamibi Myocardial SPECT Images. J Nuclear Med, 2000; 41: 502–13 20. Bai J, Hashomoto J et al: Comparison of image reconstruction algorithms in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2001; 15(1): 79–83 21. Shepp LA, Vardi Y: Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1982; MI-1: 113–22 22. Pierre-Yves M, Djaballah W et al: OSEM Reconstruction, Associated with Temporal Fourier and Depth-Dependant Resolution recovery Filtering, Enhances Results from Sestamibi and Tl-201 16-Interval Gated SPECT. J Nuclear Med, 2005; 46, 1789–95 23. King MA, Schwinger RB et al: Two-Dimensional Filtering of SPECT Images using the Metz and Wiener Filters. J Nuclear Med, 1984; 25: 1234–40 24. King MA, Doherty PW et al: Fast Count-Dependent Digital Filtering of Nuclear Medicine Images: Concise Communication. J Nuclear Med, 1983; 24: 1039–45 25. King MA, Glick SJ et al: Interactive Visual Optimization of SPECT Prereconstruction Filtering. J Nuclear Med, 1987; 28: 1192–98 26. Gilland DR, Tsui BMW et al: Determination of the Optimum Filter Function for SPECT Imaging. J Nuclear Med, 1988; 29: 643–50 52