Kalra et al. ters improve low radiation dose chest CT images? Pilot Study. Radiology 2003;228:257-264 10. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT: Evaluation of image improvement from noise reduction fil- ters-pilot study. Radiology 2003;228:251-256 11. Cohnen M, Fischer H, Hamacher J, Lins E, Kotter R, Modder U. CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: rela- tionship between image quality and dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1654-1660 12. Haaga JR, Miraldi F, MacIntyre W, LiPuma JP, Bryan PJ, Wiesen E. The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomogra- phy image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. Radiology 1981;138:449-454 13. Haaga JR. Radiation Dose Management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:289-91 14. Vade A, Demos TC, Olson MC, et al. Evaluation of image quali- ty using 1:1 pitch and 1.5:1 pitch helical CT in children: a com- parative study. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:891-893 15. Diel J, Perlmutter S, Venkataramanan N, Mueller R, Lane MJ, Katz DS. Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for sus- pected renal colic: an effective technique for radiation dose re- duction? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:795-801 16. Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, Arams RS, McCauley DI. Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology 1990;175:729-731 17. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a Large Children’s Hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:303-306 18. Han TS, van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Waist circumfer- ence action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk fac- tors: prevalence study in a random sample. Br Med J 1995;311: 1401-1405 19. Seidell JC, Oosterlee A, Deurenberg P, Hautvast JG, Ruijs JH. Abdominal fat depots measured with computed tomography. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;42:805-815 238 Korean J Radiol 4(4), December 2003