7:663–664. Ladics GS, Chapin RE, Hastings KL, Holsapple MP, Makris SL, Sheets LP, et al. 2005. Developmental toxicology evalua- tions—issues with including neurotoxicology and immuno- toxicology assessments in reproductive toxicology studies. Toxicol Sci 88:24–29. Lein P, Locke P, Goldberg A. 2007. Meeting report: alternatives Perspect 115:764–768. Levine TE, Butcher RE. 1990. Workshop on the qualitative and quantitative comparability of human and animal develop- mental neurotoxicity, Work Group IV report: triggers for developmental neurotoxicity testing. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12:281–284. 2008]. MacPhail RC, Tilson HA, Moser VC, Becking GC, Cuomo V, Frantik E, et al. 1997. The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening. I. Background and genesis. Neurotoxicology 18:925–928. Makris S, Raffaelle K, Sette W, Seed J. 1998. A Retrospective Analysis of Twelve Developmental Neurotoxicity Studies. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ scipoly/sap/meetings/ 1998/120898_mtg.htm#materials [accessed 21 November Makris SL, Crofton KM, Doherty J, Raffaele KC, Mendez E, Schumacher K. 2006. Retrospective review of developmental neurotoxicity studies utilizing gavage dosing of pre-weaning rats demonstrates no adverse consequences of dosing pro- cedures on brain morphometry. Toxicologist 90:291. Makris SL, Mendez E, Raffaele KC. 2005. A retrospective review of studies utilizing gavage dosing of pre-weaning rats demonstrated no adverse consequences of dosing procedures. Toxicologist 84:77. Middaugh LD, Dow-Edwards D, Li AA, Sandler JD, Seed J, Sheets LP, et al. 2003. Neurobehavioral assessment: a sur- vey of use and value in safety assessment studies. Toxicol Mileson BE, Ferenc SA. 2001. Methods to identify and charac- terize developmental neurotoxicity for human health risk assessment: overview. Environ Health Perspect 109(suppl Sci 76:250–261. 1):77–78. experimental conditions of water multiple-T-maze and active avoidance test. Congenit Anom 24:265. Mizutani M. 1985. Collaborative studies on behavioral teratol- ogy by 46 laboratories: effects of behavioral teratogenic chemicals on the learning behavior of the rat. Congenit Anom 25:197. Moser VC, Becking GC, Cuomo V, Frantik E, Kulig BM, MacPhail RC, et al. 1997a. The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: III. Results of profi- ciency studies. Steering Group. Neurotoxicology 18:939–946. Moser VC, Becking GC, Cuomo V, Frantik E, Kulig BM, MacPhail RC, et al. 1997b. The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: IV. Control data. Steering Group. Neurotoxicology 18:947–967. Makris et al. Kavlock RJ, Ankley G, Blancato J, Breen M, Conolly R, Dix D, et al. 2008. Computational toxicology—a state of the science mini review. Toxicol Sci doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm297 [Online Comparison of chlordimeform and carbaryl using a functional observational battery. Fundam Appl Toxicol 11:189–206. vl=861182/cl=34/nw=1/rpsv/ij/oecdjournals/1607310x/v1n4/ s27/p1[accessed 9 December 2008]. Moser VC, Tilson HA, MacPhail RC, Becking GC, Cuomo V, OECD. 2008a. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, 7 December 2007]. Toxicol Teratol 7:541–545. Kimmel CA, Buelke-Sam J. 1985. Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study: background and overview. Neurobehav Kimmel CA, Buelke-Sam J, Adams J. 1985. Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study: implications, current appli- cations and future directions. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:669–673. Frantik E, et al. 1997e. The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: II. Protocol design and testing procedures. Neurotoxicology 18:929–938. Moser VC, Walls I, Zoetis T. 2005. Direct dosing of pre-weaning rodents in toxicity testing and research: deliberations of an ILSI RSI Expert Working Group. Int J Toxicol 24:87–94. exposure to industrial solvents in experimental animals. Kimmel CA, Rees DC, Francis EZ, eds. 1990. Qualitative and Neurotoxicology 7:441–447. quantitative comparability of human and animal develop- Nelson CJ, Felton RP, Kimmel CA, Buelke-Sam J, Adams J. mental neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12:173–292. Kutscher CL, Nelson BK. 1985. Dosing considerations in 1985. Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study: statistical approach. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:587–590. Number 89: Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Test Guideline 426 on Developmental Neurotoxicity. ENV/JM/MONO(2008)15. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www. olis.oecd.org/olis/2008doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT000035EA/$FILE/ JT03249260.PDF [accessed 8 December 2008]. 43: Guidance Document on Mammalian Reproductive Toxicity Testing and Assessment. ENV/JM/MONO(2008)16. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www.olis.oecd.org/ olis/2008doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT0000358A/$FILE/JT03249193. Nelson BK. 1986. Developmental neurotoxicology of in utero OECD. 2008b. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, Number behavioral teratology testing. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol Nishmura T, Iwase T, Hasimoto Y, Tanimura T. 2001. Evaluation PDF [accessed 8 December 2008]. Nolen GA. 1985. An industrial developmental toxicologist’s Okazaki S, Takashima H, Yamaguchi M, Hamamura M, of a core battery of tests for detecting behavioral dysfunc- tion of rat offspring induced by retinoic acid: collaborative work II of the Japanese Behavioral Teratology Committee. Congenit Anom 41:156–168. view of behavioral teratology and possible guidelines. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:653–657. Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities. Washington, DC:National Academy Press. Office of Technology Assessment. 1990. Neurotoxicity: Identifying and Controlling Poisons of the Nervous System. OTA-BA-438. Washington, DC:Office of Technology Assessment. Yamashita K, Okada M, et al. 2003. Neurobehavioral toxic- ity of acrylamide and IDPN (3,3´-iminodipropionitrile) in rats by 28-day oral administration—problems encountered in collaborative study and a commentary on conducting neurobehavioral testing. J Toxicol Sci 28(suppl 1):1–14. NRC (National Research Council). 1992. Environmental Pryor GT, Uyeno ET, Tilson HA, Mitchell CL. 1983. Assessment Neurotoxicology. Washington, DC:National Academy Press. NRC (National Research Council). 1993. Pesticides in the of chemicals using a battery of neurobehavioral tests: a comparative study. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 5:91–117. Diets of Infants and Children. Washington, DC:National Puopolo M. 2004. Biostatistical approaches to reducing the for developmental neurotoxicity testing. Environ Health NRC (National Research Council). 1984. Toxicity Testing: Li A. 2005. Regulatory developmental neurotoxicology testing: Academy Press. number of animals used in biomedical research [in Italian]. data evaluation for risk assessment purposes. Environ NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Scientific Frontiers Ann Ist Super Sanita 40:157–163. Toxicol Pharmacol 19:727–733. in Developmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment. Raffaele KC, Fisher JE, Hancock S, Hazelden KP, Sobrian SK. MacPhail RC, Peele DB, Crofton KM. 1989. Motor activity and Washington, DC:National Academy Press. screening for neurotoxicity. J Am Coll Toxicol 8:117–125. NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Washington, Raffaele KC, Gilbert ME, Crofton S. 2004. Learning and memory 2008. Determining normal variability in a developmental neurotoxicity test. Neurotoxicol Teratol 30(4):288–325. tests in developmental neurotoxicity testing: a cross- laboratory comparison of control data. Toxicologist 78:276. Raffaele KC, Gilbert ME, Crofton KM, Mendez E, Doherty JD, Schumacher W, et al. 2006. Evaluation of learning and memory in developmental neurotoxicity studies: com- parison of single-choice water maze across laboratories. Toxicologist 90:291. Raffaele KC, Sette W, Doherty JD, Makris SL, Crofton KM. 2005. Neuropathological findings in developmental neurotoxicity testing: comparison of qualitative and quantitative evalua- tions. Toxicologist 84:200. DC:National Academies Press. OECD. 1983. Test Guideline 415. OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. One-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www.oecd.org/docume nt/40/0,3343,en_2649_34377_37051368_1_1_1_1,00.html [accessed 6 August 2008]. OECD. 1995. Draft Report of the OECD Ad Hoc Working Group on Reproduction and Developmental Toxicity. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD. 1996a. Final Report of the OECD Consultation Meeting Raffaele KC, Sette W, Makris SL, Moser V, Crofton KM. 2003. on Developmental Neurotoxicity. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Motor activity in developmental neurotoxicity testing: a cross- laboratory comparison of control data. Toxicologist 72:123. OECD. 1996b. Report of the OECD Workshop on “Harmonisation Rice D, Barone S Jr. 2000. Critical periods of vulnerability for the of Validation and Acceptance Criteria for Alternative Toxicological Test Methods” (Solna Report). ENV/MC/ CHEM(96)9. Paris:Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development. developing nervous system: evidence from humans and ani- mal models. Environ Health Perspect 108(suppl 3):511–533. Rodier PM. 1980. Chronology of neuron development: animal studies and their clinical implications. Dev Med Child OECD. 1997. Test Guideline 424. OECD Guideline for Testing Neurol 22:525–545. o f C h e m i c a l s . N e u r o t o x i c i t y S t u d y i n R o d e n t s . Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Develop- ment. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/40/0,33 43,en_2649_34377_37051368_1_1_1_1,00.html [accessed 6 August 2008]. Rodier PM. 1986. Time of exposure and time of testing in developmental neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicology 7:69–76. Rodier PM. 1994. Vulnerable periods and processes during central nervous system development. Environ Health Perspect 102(suppl 2):121–124. of Chemicals. Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://www.oecd.org/document/ 40/0,3343,en_2649_34377_37051368_1_1_1_1,00.html [accessed 6 August 2008]. 2007. A retrospective review of the use of the develop- mental neurotoxicity study in pesticide risk assessments. Toxicologist 96:369. Schreiner G, Ulbrich B, Bass R. 1986. Testing strategies in behavioral teratology: II. Discrimination learning. OECD. 2003. Report of the OECD Expert Consultation Meeting Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 8:567–572. on Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing, Washington, DC, 23–25 October 2000. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD. 2005a. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, Number 34: Guidance Document on the Validation and International Acceptance of New or Updated Test Methods for Hazard Assessment. ENV/JM/MONO(2005)14. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Schull WJ, Norton S, Jensh RP. 1990. Ionizing radiation and the developing brain. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12:249–260. Sette WF, Crofton KM, Makris SL, Doherty JD, Raffaele KC. 2004. Auditory startle reflex habituation in developmental neurotoxicity testing: a cross-laboratory comparison of control data. Toxicologist 78:275. Slikker W Jr, Acuff K, Boyes WK, Chelonis J, Crofton KM, Dearlove GE, et al. 2005. Behavioral test methods work- Mizutani M. 1984. Joint studies by 31 laboratories on some OECD. 2001. Test Guideline 414. OECD Guideline for Testing Rowland J, Makris SL, Raffaele K, Schumacher K, Scarano L. Moser VC, Becking GC, Cuomo V, Frantik E, Kulig BM, OECD. 2005b. Report of the Expert Consultation Meeting for shop. Neurotoxicol Teratol 27:417–427. MacPhail RC, et al. 1997c. The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: V. Results of chemi- cal testing. Steering Group. Neurotoxicology 18:969–1055. the Revision of Draft Test Guideline 426 on Developmental Neurotoxicity. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sobotka TJ, Vorhees CV. 1985. Application of behavioral teratology testing procedures. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:665. Spencer PJ, Mattsson JL, Johnson KA, Albee RR. 1993. Moser VC, Becking GC, MacPhail RC, Kulig BM. 1997d. The OECD. 2007. Test Guideline 426. OECD Guideline for Testing Neurotoxicity screening methods are sensitive to experi- IPCS collaborative study on neurobehavioral screening methods. Fundam Appl Toxicol 35:143–151. Moser VC, McCormick JP, Creason JP, MacPhail RC. 1988. of Chemicals. Developmental Neurotoxicity Study. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available: http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/ mental history. Int J Psychophysiol 14:5–19. Spyker JM, Smithberg M. 1972. Effects of methylmercury on prenatal development in mice. Teratology 5:181–190. 24 ovlume 117 | number 1 | January 2009 • Environmental Health Perspectives