862 A. Colles, L. H. Liow and A. Prinzing Maddison, W.P., Midford, P.E. & Otto, S.P. (2007). Estimating a binary character s effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol., 56, 701–710. McKinney, M. (1997). Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 495–516. Mitter, C., Farrell, B. & Wiegmann, B. (1988). The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones – has phytophagy promoted insect diversiﬁcation? Am. Nat., 132, 107–128. Moran, N.A. (1988). The evolution of host-plant alternation in Aphids: evidence for specialization as a dead end. Am. Nat., 132, 681–706. Morse, G.E. & Farrell, B.D. (2005). Ecological and evolutionary diversiﬁcation of the seed beetle genus Stator (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Evolution, 59, 1315–1333. Munday, P.L. (2004). Habitat loss, resource specialization, and extinction on coral reefs. Glob. Chang. Biol., 10, 1642–1647. Munoz-Duran, J. (2002). Correlates of speciation and extinction rates in the Carnivora. Evol. Ecol. Res., 4, 963–991. Norris, R.D. (1992). Extinction selectivity and ecology in Planktonic-Foraminifera. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 95, 1–17. Nosil, P. & Mooers, A.Ø. (2005). Testing hypotheses about eco- logical specialization using phylogenetic trees. Evolution, 59, 2256–2263. Novotny, V., Drozd, P., Miller, S.E., Kulfan, M., Janda, M., Basset, Y. et al. (2006). Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests? Science, 313, 1115–1118. Oakley, T.H. & Cunningham, C.W. (2000). Independent contrasts succeed where ancestral reconstruction fails in a known bacte- riophage phylogeny. Evolution, 54, 397–405. Polly, P.D. (2001). Paleontology and the comparative method: ancestral node reconstructions versus observed node values. Am. Nat., 157, 596–609. Prinzing, A. (2003). Are generalists pressed for time? An inter- speciﬁc test of the Time-limited Disperser Model. Ecology, 84, 1744–1755. Prinzing, A., Durka, W., Klotz, S. & Brandl, R. (2002a). Which species become aliens? Evol. Ecol. Res., 4, 385–405. Prinzing, A., Durka, W., Klotz, S. & Brandl, R. (2002b). Geo- graphic variability of ecological niches of plant species: are competition and stress relevant? Ecography, 25, 721–729. Prinzing, A., Ozinga, W. & Durka, W. (2004). The relationship between the global and regional distribution of species changes during phylogeny. Evolution, 58, 2622–2633. Prinzing, A., Reiffers, R., Braakhekke, W.G., Hennekens, S.M., Tackenberg, O., Ozinga, W.A. et al. (2008). Less lineages – more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse. Ecol. Lett., 11, 809–819. Rapoport, E.H. (1982). Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species. Pergamon Press, Oxford. Rezende, E.L., Lavabre, J.E., Guimaraes, P.R., Jordano, P. & Bascompte, J. (2007). Non-random coextinctions in phylogenet- ically structured mutualistic networks. Nature, 448, 925–926. Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995). Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cam- bridge University Press, New York. Saﬁ, K. & Kerth, G. (2004). A comparative analysis of specializa- tion and extinction risk in temperate-zone bats. Conserv. Biol., 18, 1293–1299. 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS Review and Synthesis Sanchez, B., Prado, J.L. & Alberdi, M.T. (2006). Ancient feeding, ecology and extinction of Pleistocene horses from the Pampean Region. Ameghiniana, 43, 427–436. Sargent, R.D. & Vamosi, J.C. (2008). The inﬂuence of canopy position, pollinator syndrome, and region on evolutionary transitions in pollinator guild size. Int. J. Plant Sci., 169, 39– 47. Schluter, D. (2000). The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford. Simpson, G.G. (1944). Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia- University Press, New York. Smith, A.B. & Jeffery, C.H. (1998). Selectivity of extinction among sea urchins at the end of the Cretaceous period. Nature, 392, 68– 71. Spitze, K. & Sadler, T.D. (1996). Evolution of a generalist geno- type: multivariate analysis of the adaptiveness of phenotypic plasticity. Am. Nat., 148, S108–S123. Stephens, P.R. & Wiens, J.J. (2003). Ecological diversiﬁcation and phylogeny of emydid Turtle. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 79, 577– 610. Stireman, J.O. (2005). The evolution of generalization? Parasitoid ﬂies and the perils of inferring host range evolution from phylogenies. J. Evol. Biol., 18, 325–336. Thompson, J.N. (1994). The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Vamosi, J.C. & Wilson, J.R.U. (2008). Nonrandom extinction leads to elevated loss of angiosperm evolutionary history. Ecol. Lett., 11, 1047–1053. Van Valkenburgh, B., Wang, X. & Damuth, J. (2004). Cope s rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American Canids. Sci- ence, 306, 101–104. Vrba, E.S. (1987). Ecology in relation to speciation rates. Some case histories of Miocene-Recent mammal clades. Evol. Ecol., 1, 283–300. Walker, K.J. & Preston, C.D. (2006). Ecological predictors of extinction risk in the Flora of Lowland England, UK. Biodivers. Conserv., 15, 1913–1942. Ward, A.A. (1986). Optimal habitat selection in time-limited dis- persers. Am. Nat., 129, 568–579. Warren, M.S., Hill, J.K., Thomas, J.A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B. et al. (2001). Rapid responses of British butterﬂies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature, 414, 65–69. Webster, A.J. & Purvis, A. (2002). Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, 269, 143–149. Wiens, J.J. & Graham, C.H. (2005). Niche conservatism: integrat- ing evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 36, 519–539. Williams, P. (2005). Does specialization explain rarity among British bumblebees? A response to Goulson et al. Biol. Conserv., 122, 33–43. Williams, Y.M., Williams, S.E., Alford, R.A., Waycott, M. & Johnson, C.N. (2006). Niche breadth and geographical range: ecological compensation for geographical rarity in rainforest frogs. Biol. Lett., 2, 532–535. Zayed, A., Packer, L., Grixti, J.C., Ruz, L., Owen, R.E. & Toro, H. (2005). Increased genetic differentiation in a specialist versus a generalist bee: implications for conservation. Conserv. Genet., 6, 1017–1026.