Bishop DK, Zickler D (2004) Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117: 9–15 Blat Y, Protacio RU, Hunter N, Kleckner N (2002) Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 111: 791–802 Borner GV, Kleckner N, Hunter N (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29–45 Buhler C, Borde V, Lichten M (2007) Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 5: e324 Bylebyl GR, Belichenko I, Johnson ES (2003) The SUMO isopepti- dase Ulp2 prevents accumulation of SUMO chains in yeast. J Biol Chem 278: 44113–44120 Carballo JA, Johnson AL, Sedgwick SG, Cha RS (2008) Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/ Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132: 758–770 Cheng CH, Lin FM, Lo YH, Wang TF (2007) Tying SUMO modiﬁca- tions to dynamic behaviors of chromosomes during meiotic prophase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biomed Sci 14: 481–490 Cheng CH, Lo YH, Liang SS, Ti SC, Lin FM, Yeh CH, Huang HY, Wang TF (2006) SUMO modiﬁcations control assembly of synap- tonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 20: 2067–2081 Chua PR, Roeder GS (1998) Zip2, a meiosis-speciﬁc protein required for the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Cell 93: 349–359 Clyne RK, Katis VL, Jessop L, Benjamin KR, Herskowitz I, Lichten M, Nasmyth K (2003) Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I. Nat Cell Biol 5: 480–485 Conrad MN, Lee CY, Chao G, Shinohara M, Kosaka H, Shinohara A, Conchello JA, Dresser ME (2008) Rapid telomere movement in meiotic prophase is promoted by NDJ1, MPS3, and CSM4 and is modulated by recombination. Cell 133: 1175–1187 de los Santos T, Hollingsworth NM (1999) Red1p, a MEK1-depen- dent phosphoprotein that physically interacts with Hop1p during meiosis in yeast. J Biol Chem 274: 1783–1790 de los Santos T, Hunter N, Lee C, Larkin B, Loidl J, Hollingsworth NM (2003) The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164: 81–94 Dong H, Roeder GS (2000) Organization of the yeast Zip1 protein within the central region of the synaptonemal complex. J Cell Biol 148: 417–4260 Fung JC, Rockmill B, Odell M, Roeder GS (2004) Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 116: 795–802 Gill G (2004) SUMO and ubiquitin in the nucleus: different func- tions, similar mechanisms? Genes Dev 18: 2046–2059 Henderson KA, Keeney S (2005) Synaptonemal complex formation: where does it start? Bioessays 27: 995–998 Hollingsworth NM, Ponte L (1997) Genetic interactions between HOP1, RED1 and MEK1 suggest that MEK1 regulates assembly of axial element components during meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147: 33–42 Hollingsworth NM, Ponte L, Halsey C (1995) MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev 9: 1728–1739 Hong EJ, Roeder GS (2002) A role for Ddc1 in signaling meiotic double-strand breaks at the pachytene checkpoint. Genes Dev 16: 363–376 Hooker GW, Roeder GS (2006) A Role for SUMO in meiotic chromosome synapsis. Curr Biol 16: 1238–1243 Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98: 4569–4574 Jessop L, Lichten M (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31: 313–323 & 2010 European Molecular Biology Organization Red1 binds Smt3 chains F-M Lin et al Jessop L, Rockmill B, Roeder GS, Lichten M (2006) Meiotic chromo- some synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of sgs1. PLoS Genet 2: e155 Keeney S (2001) Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Current Top Develop Biol 52: 1–53 Kironmai KM, Muniyappa K, Friedman DB, Hollingsworth NM, Byers B (1998) DNA-binding activities of Hop1 protein, a synap- tonemal complex component from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 18: 1424–1435 Klein F, Mahr P, Galova M, Buonomo SB, Michaelis C, Nairz K, Nasmyth K (1999) A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98: 91–103 Koszul R, Kim KP, Prentiss M, Kleckner N, Kameoka S (2008) Meiotic chromosomes move by linkage to dynamic actin cables with transduction of force through the nuclear envelope. Cell 133: 1188–1201 Lynn A, Soucek R, Borner GV (2007) ZMM proteins during meiosis: Crossover artists at work. Chrom Res 15: 591–605 Martini E, Diaz RL, Hunter N, Keeney S (2006) Crossover home- ostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 126: 285–295 Minty A, Dumont X, Kaghad M, Caput D (2000) Covalent modiﬁca- tion of p73alpha by SUMO-1. Two-hybrid screening with p73 identiﬁes novel SUMO-1-interacting proteins and a SUMO-1 interaction motif. J Biol Chem 275: 36316–36323 Nakada D, Hirano Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K (2005) Role of the C terminus of Mec1 checkpoint kinase in its localization to sites of DNA damage. Mol Biol Cell 16: 5227–5235 Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S (2005) Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436: 1053–1057 Niu H, Li X, Job E, Park C, Moazed D, Gygi SP, Hollingsworth NM (2007) Mek1 kinase is regulated to suppress double-strand break repair between sister chromatids during budding yeast meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 27: 5456–5467 Niu H, Wan L, Baumgartner B, Schaefer D, Loidl J, Hollingsworth NM (2005) Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol Biol Cell 16: 5804–5818 Novak JE, Ross-Macdonald PB, Roeder GS (2001) The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics 158: 1013–1025 Oh SD, Lao JP, Hwang PY, Taylor AF, Smith GR, Hunter N (2007) BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppres- sing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130: 259–272 Oh SD, Lao JP, Taylor AF, Smith GR, Hunter N (2008) RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aber- rant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. Mol Cell 31: 324–336 Paciotti V, Clerici M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2000) The check- point protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phos- phorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev 14: 2046–2059 Page SL, Hawley RS (2004) The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20: 525–558 Penkner AM, Prinz S, Ferscha S, Klein F (2005) Mnd2, an essential antagonist of the anaphase-promoting complex during meiotic prophase. Cell 120: 789–801 Perry J, Kleckner N, Borner GV (2005) Bioinformatic analyses implicate the collaborating meiotic crossover/chiasma proteins Zip2, Zip3, and Spo22/Zip4 in ubiquitin labeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 17594–17599 Pringle JR (1975) Methods for avoiding proteolytic artefacts in studies of enzymes and other proteins from yeasts. Methods Cell Biol 12: 149–184 Rouse J, Jackson SP (2000) LCD1: an essential gene involved in checkpoint control and regulation of the MEC1 signalling path- way in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 19: 5801–5812 Shinohara M, Oh SD, Hunter N, Shinohara A (2008) Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat Genet 40: 299–309 Smith AV, Roeder GS (1997) The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol 136: 957–967 Song J, Durrin LK, Wilkinson TA, Krontiris TG, Chen Y (2004) Identiﬁcation of a SUMO-binding motif that recognizes SUMO- modiﬁed proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 14373–14378 The EMBO Journal VOL 29 | NO 3 | 2010 595