GENOME DATABASES van Baal et al. Figure 4. Secure data entry screen from a prototype CGDB, where phenotypic and genotypic data are deposited by authorised users. extended with artiﬁcial intelligence features, in an effort to create a modern diagnostic tool, based on weighted parameters, the importance of which will be deﬁned by the user, so as to be able to provide estimates on the patient’s state of health and to facilitate the diagnosis of patients with the same or a similar genetic disease. Acknowledgments Part of our work has been funded by European Commission grants [MEDGENET (FP6-31968), EuroGenTest (FP6-512148) and GEN2PHEN (FP7-200574) to J.Z. and G.P.P. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Professors Andre Megarbane (Lebanon), Habiba Haabouni (Tunisia) and Marina Kleanthous (Cyprus) for their expert supervision in the develop- ment and curation of the related NEMDBs. References 1. Lagoumintzis, G., Poulas, K. and Patrinos, G. (2010), ‘Genetic databases and their potential to pharmacogenomics’, Curr. Pharm. Des., In press. 2. Claustres, M., Horaitis, O., Vanevski, M. and Cotton, R.G. (2002), ‘Time for a uniﬁed system of mutation description and reporting: A review of locus-speciﬁc mutation databases’, Genome Res. Vol. 12, pp. 680 – 688. 3. Cotton, R.G., Phillips, K. and Horaitis, O. (2007), ‘A survey of locus- speciﬁc database curation. Human Genome Variation Society’, J. Med. Genet. Vol. 44, p. e72. 4. Patrinos, G.P. (2006), ‘National and ethnic mutation databases: Recording populations’ genography’, Hum. Mutat. Vol. 27, pp. 879 – 887. 5. Zlotogora, J., van Baal, S. and Patrinos, G.P. (2007), ‘Documentation of inherited disorders and mutation frequencies in the different religious communities in Israel in the Israeli National Genetic Database’, Hum. Mutat. Vol. 28, pp. 944 – 949. 6. Zlotogora, J., van Baal, S. and Patrinos, G.P. (2009), ‘The Israeli National Genetic Database’, Isr. Med. Assoc. J. Vol. 11, pp. 373 – 375. 7. Kleanthous, M., Patsalis, P.C., Drousiotou, A., Motazacker, M. et al. (2006), ‘The Cypriot and Iranian National Mutation Frequency Databases’, Hum. Mutat. Vol. 27, pp. 598 – 599. 8. Megarbane, A., Chouery, E., van Baal, S. and Patrinos, G.P. (2006), ‘The Lebanese National Mutation Frequency database’, Eur. J. Hum. Genet. Vol. 14 (Suppl. 1), p. 365. 9. Cohen, T., Vardi-Saliternik, R. and Friedlender, Y. (2004), ‘Consanguinity, intracommunity and intercommunity marriages in a population sample of Israeli Jews’, Ann. Hum. Biol. Vol. 31, pp. 38 – 48. 10. Jaber, L., Halpern, G.J. and Shohat, T. (2000), ‘Trends in the frequencies of consanguineous marriages in the Israeli Arab community’, Clin. Genet. Vol. 58, pp. 106 – 110. 11. Patrinos, G.P., van Baal, S., Petersen, M.B. and Papadakis, M.N. (2005), ‘Hellenic National Mutation database: A prototype database for mutations leading to inherited disorders in the Hellenic population’, Hum. Mutat. Vol. 25, pp. 327 – 233. 12. van Baal, S., Kaimakis, P., Phommarinh, M., Koumbi, D. et al. (2007), ‘FINDbase: A relational database recording frequencies of genetic defects leading to inherited disorders worldwide’, Nucleic Acids Res. Vol. 35, pp. D690 – D695. 13. Povey, S., Al Aqeel, A.I., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Dalgleish, R. et al. (2010), ‘Practical guidelines addressing ethical issues pertaining to the curation of human locus-speciﬁc variation databases (LSDBs)’, Hum. Mutat., In press. 14. Patrinos, G.P. and Brookes, A.J. (2005), ‘DNA, diseases and databases: Disastrously deﬁcient’, Trends Genet. Vol. 21, pp. 333 – 338. 368 # HENRY STEWART PUBLICATIONS 1479 – 7364. HUMAN GENOMICS. VOL 4. NO 5. 361 – 368 JUNE 2010