Ammar with abdominal-wall hernias. Hernia 2006;10(3):213- 217. 12. King JN, Didlake RH, Gray RE. Giant inguinal hernia. South Med J 1986;79(2):252-253. 13. Morris-Stiff GJ, Hughes LE. The outcomes of nonab- sorbable mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: lit- erature review and clinical experience. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186(3):352-367. 14. White TJ, Santos MC, Thompson JS. Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. Am Surg 1998;64(3):276-280. 15. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. Component separa- tion method for closure of abdominal wall defects: an anatomic and clinic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 ;86:519-26. 16. Ko JH, Salvay DM, Paul BC, Wang EC, Dumanian GA. Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, sig- nificantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique. Plast Re- constr Surg 2009;124(3):836-847. 17. Tran NV, Petty PM, Bite U, Clay RP, Johnson CH, Ar- nold PG. Tissue expansion-assisted closure of massive ventral hernias. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196(3):484-488. 18. Lipman J, Medalie D, Rosen MJ. Staged repair of mas- sive incisional hernias with loss of abdominal domain: a novel approach. Am J Surg 2008;195(1):84-88. 19. Han JG, Ma SZ, Song JK, Wang ZJ. Operative treat- ment of ventral hernia using prosthetic materials. Her- nia. 2007; 11:419-423. 20. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, JN IJ, Boelhouwer RU, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for inci- sional hernia. N Engl J Med 2000;343(6):392-398. 21. Baptista ML, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP. Seprafilm reduces adhesions to polypropylene mesh. Surgery 2000;128(1):86-92. 22. Law NH, Ellis H. Adhesion formation and peritoneal healing on prosthetic materials. Clin Mater. 1988;3:95- J Clin Med Res • 2009;1(4):226-229 101. 23. Jenkins SD, Klamer TW, Parteka JJ, Condon RE. A com- parison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Surgery 1983;94(2):392-398. 24. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Sostrin S, Young J, Hakakha M. Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorpo- ration to the abdominal wall without adhering to the in- testines. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28(3):373-375. 25. Kayaoglu HA, Ozkan N, Hazinedaroglu SM, Arsoy OF, Erkek AB, and Koseoglu RD. Comparison of adhesive properties of five different prosthetic materials used in hernioplasty. J Invest Surg. 2005;18:89-95. 26. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D, van der Wilt GJ, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP. Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypro- pylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 2004;8(1):56-59. 27. Szabo A, Haj M, Waxsman I, Eitan A. Evaluation of se- prafilm and amniotic membrane as adhesion prophylaxis in mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia in rats. Eur Surg Res 2000;32(2):125-128. 28. van ‘t Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ. Pre- vention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model. Ann Surg 2003;237(1):123-128. 29. Felemovicius I, Bonsack ME, Hagerman G, Delaney JP. Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198(4):543-548. 30. van’t Riet M, Burger JW, Bonthuis F, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ. Prevention of adhesion formation to polypropyl- ene mesh by collagen coating: a randomized controlled study in a rat model of ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2004;18(4):681-685. 31. Shawki S, Wexner SD. How safe is bowel preparation with oral sodium phosphate solution? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;5(9):482-483. Articles © The authors, Journal compilation © J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press™, www.jocmr.org 229