20. Bove M, Tacchino A, Pelosin E, Abbruzzese G, Ghilardi MF (2009) Spontaneous movement tempo is influenced by observation of rhythmical actions. Brain Res Bull 80: 122–127. 21. Obhi SS, Hogeveen J (2010) Incidental action observation modulates muscle activity. Exp Brain Res 203: 427–435. 22. Salama IM, Turner S, Edwards MG (2011) Automatic priming of grip force following action observation. Q J Exp Psychol 64: 833–838. 23. Bisio A, Stucchi N, Jacono M, Fadiga L, Pozzo T (2010) Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: Effect of visual context and stimulus velocity. PLoS ONE 5: e13506. 24. Wild K, Poliakoff E, Jerrison A, Gowen E (2010) The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation. Exp Brain Res 204: 353–360. 25. Ronchi R, Revol P, Katayama M, Rossetti Y, Farne` A (2011) Seeing your error alters my pointing: Observing systematic pointing errors induces sensori-motor after-effects. PLoS ONE 6: e21070. 26. Meulenbroek RGJ, Bosga J, Hulstijn M, Miedl S (2007) Joint-action coordination in transferring objects. Exp Brain Res 180: 333–343. 27. Hardwick RM, Edwards MG (2011) Observed reach trajectory influences executed reach kinematics in prehension. Q J Exp Psychol 64: 1082–1093. 28. Campione G, Gentilucci M (2011) Is the observation of the human kinematics sufficient to activate automatic imitation of transitive actions? Behav Brain Res 225: 201–208. 29. Castiello U, Lusher D, Mari M, Edwards M, Humphreys GW (2002) Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object: Differential motor priming effects. In: Prinz W, Hommel B, editors. Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 315–333. 30. Edwards MG, Humphreys GW, Castiello U (2003) Motor facilitation following action observation: A behavioural study in prehensile action. Brain Cogn 53: 495–502. 31. Gianellie C, Volta RD, Barbieri F, Gentilucci M (2008) Automatic grasp imitation following action observation affects estimation of object properties. Brain Res 1218: 166–180. 32. Kilner JM, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr Biol 13: 522–525. 33. Kilner JM, Hamilton AF, Blakemore SJ (2007) Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion. Soc Neurosci 2: 158–166. 34. Bouquet CA, Gaurier V, Shipley T, Toussaint L, Blandin Y (2007) Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution. J Sport Sci 25: 519–530. 35. Richardson MJ, Campbell WL, Schmidt RC (2009) Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination. Neurosci Lett 449: 117–22. 36. Hove MJ, Spivey MJ, Krumhansl CL (2010) Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36: 1525– 1534. Automatic Imitation in Rhythmical Actions 37. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113. 38. Koski L, Iacoboni M, Dubeau MC, Woods RP, Mazziotta JC (2003) Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. J Neurophysiol 89: 460–471. 39. Schmidt RC, Richardson MJ, Arsenault C, Galantucci B (2007) Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33: 860–870. 40. Eaves DL, Breslin G, Robinson E, van Schaik P, Spears IR (2011) The short- term effects of real-time virtual reality feedback on motor learning in dance. Presence (Special Issue: Virtual Reality and Sports) 20: 62–77. 41. Vogt S (1996) Imagery and perception-action mediation in imitative actions. Cogn Brain Res 3: 79–86. 42. Noy L, Rumiati RI, Flash T (2009) Simple movement imitation: Are kinematic features sufficient to map perceptions into actions? Brain Cogn 69: 360–368. 43. Zentgraf K, Munzert J, Bischoff M, Newman-Norlund RD (2011) Simulation during observation of human actions – theories, empirical studies, applications. Vision Res 51: 827–835. 44. Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2010) Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 269–298. 45. Gowen E, Bradshaw C, Galpin A, Lawrence A, Poliakoff E (2010) Exploring visuomotor priming following biological and non-biological stimuli. Brain Cogn 74: 288–97. 46. Miall RC, Stanley J, Todhunter S, Levick C, Lindo S, et al. (2006) Performing hand actions assists the visual discrimination of similar hand postures. Neuropsychologia 44: 966–977. 47. Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA (2009) Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information. Neuropsychologia 47: 1573–1577. 48. Hecht H, Vogt S, Prinz W (2001) Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: A case for action-perception transfer. Psychol Res 65: 3–14. 49. Vogt S, McIntosh RD, Milner AD (2001) Unintentional imitation of the rhythmicity of everyday actions in a patient with visual form agnosia (unpublished pilot study). 50. Milner AD, Perrett DI, Johnston RS, Benson PJ, Jordan TR, et al. (1991) Perception and action in ‘visual form agnosia’. Brain 114: 405–428. 51. DiDio C, di Cesare G, Higuchi S, Roberts N, Vogt S, et al. (in press) The neural correlates of velocity processing during the observation of a biological object in the parietal and premotor cortex. NeuroImage. 52. Grahn JA, Rowe JB (2009) Feeling the beat: Premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. J Neurosci 29: 7540–7548. 53. Higuchi S, DiDio C, Ziessler M, Turgeon M, Roberts N, et al. (2009) Mirror neuron system and imitation learning of sequences and rhythms: An event- related fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping Conference. San Francisco, June 2009. PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 12 October 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 10 | e46728