References 1. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74: 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464. 2. Kluger J Too many one-night stands? Blame your genes. Time. Available: http://healthland.time.com/2010/12/02/too-many-one-night-stands-blame- your-genes/Accessed: 8 May 2012.. 3. Day L (2010) Is there a liberal gene? Discovery News. Available: http://news. discovery.com/human/is-there-a-liberal-gene.html. Accessed 2012 May 8. 4. Schinka J, Letsch E, Crawford F (2002) DRD4 and novelty seeking: Results of meta-analyses. Am J Med Genet 114: 643–648. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10649. 5. Kluger AN, Siegfried Z, Ebstein RP (2002) A meta-analysis of the association between DRD4 polymorphism and novelty seeking. Mol Psychiatry 7: 712–717. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001082. 6. Dar-Nimrod I, Heine SJ (2011) Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychol Bull 137: 800–818. doi: 10.1037/a0021860. 7. Haslam N, Rothschild L, Ernst D (2000) Essentialist beliefs about social categories. Br J Soc Psychol 39: 113–127. doi: 10.1348/014466600164363. 8. Medin DL, Ortony A (1989) Comments on Part I: Psychological essentialism. In: Vosniadou S, Ortony A, eds. Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: C a m b r i d g e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s . p p 1 7 9 – 1 9 5 . d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 1 7 / CBO9780511529863.009. 9. Rehder B, Burnett RC (2005) Feature inference and the causal structure of categories. Cogn Psychol 50: 264–314. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.09.002. 10. Rips, J L (1989) Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In: Vosniadou S, Ortony A, eds. Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp 21–59. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.004. 11. Keller J (2005) In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol 88: 686–702. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686. 12. Johnson W (2010) Understanding the genetics of intelligence: Can height help? Can corn oil? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 19: 177–182. doi: 10.1177/ 0963721410370136. 13. Monterosso J, Royzman EB, Schwartz B (2005) Explaining away responsibility: Effects of scientific explanation on perceived culpability. Ethics Behav 15: 139–158. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1502_4. 14. Dar-Nimrod I, Heine SJ, Cheung BY, Schaller M (2011) Do scientific theories affect men’s evaluations of sex crimes? Aggress Behav 37: 440–449. doi: 10.1002/ab.20401. 15. Dar-Nimrod I, Heine SJ (2006) Exposure to Scientific Theories Affects Women’s Math Performance. Science 314: 435. doi: 10.1126/science.1131100. 16. Brescoll V, LaFrance M (2004) The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences. Psychol Sci 15: 515–520. doi: 10.1111/ j.0956-7976.2004.00712.x. 17. Atran S (1998) Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behav Brain Sci 21: 547–609. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X98001277. 18. Gil-White FJ (2001) Are ethnic groups biological ‘species’ to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Curr Anthropol 42: 515–554. doi: 10.1086/321802. 19. Taylor MG, Rhodes M, Gelman, SA (2009) Boys will be boys; Cows will be cows: Children’s essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species. Child Dev 80: 461–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01272.x. Implicit Essentialism 20. Rangel U, Keller J (2011) Essentialism goes social: Belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. J Pers Soc Psychol 100: 1056–1078. doi: 10.1037/a0022401. 21. Fazio RH, Jackson JR, Dunton BC, Williams CJ (1995) Variability in automatic activation as an unobstrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?. J Pers Soc Psychol 69: 1013–1027. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013. 22. Baron A, Banaji MR (2006) The Development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychol Sci 17: 53–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.x. 23. Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (2002) Math = male, me = female, therefore math ? me. J Pers Soc Psychol 83: 44–59. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.83.1.44. 24. Nosek BA, Smyth FL, Hansen JJ, Devos T, Lindner NM, al et (2007) Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 18: 36–88. doi: 10.1080/10463280701489053. 25. Cvencek D, Meltzoff AN, Greenwald AG (2011) Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Dev 82: 766–779. doi: 10.1111/j.1467– 8624.2010.01529.x. 26. Bargh J, Gollwitzer PM, Lee-Chai A, Barndollar K, Tro¨tschel R (2001) The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 81: 1014–1027. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1014. 27. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA (2001) Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Z Exp Psychol 48: 85–93. doi: 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85. 28. Greenwald AG, Poehlman T, Uhlmann E, Banaji MR (2009) Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 97: 17–41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575. 29. Paulhus DL, Carey JM (2011) The FAD-Plus: Measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs. Journal Pers Assess 93: 96–104. doi: 10.1080/ 00223891.2010.528483. 30. Nichols S, Knobe J (2007) Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous 41: 663–685. doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 0068.2007.00666.x. 31. Feltz A, Cokely ET, Nadelhoffer T (2009) Natural compatibilism versus natural incompatibilism: Back to the drawing board. Mind Lang 24: 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01351.x. 32. Voland E (2000) Nature or nurture? –the debate of the century, a category error, and the illuminating impact of evolutionary psychology, Eur Psychol 5: 196–199. doi: 10.1027//1016-9040.5.3.196. 33. Bluemke M, Friese M (2008) Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. Eur J Soc Psychol 38: 977–997. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.487. 34. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspect Psychol Sci 6: 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. 35. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR (2003) Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 85: 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197. 36. Shostak S, Freese J, Link BG, Phelan JC (2009) The politics of the gene: Social status and beliefs about genetics for individual outcomes. Soc Psychol Q 72: 77–93. doi: 10.1177/019027250907200107. 37. Arkes HR, Tetlock PE (2004) Attributions of implicit prejudice, or ‘would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the Implicit Association Test?’. Psychol Inq 15: 257–278. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01. PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 4 June 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 6 | e38176