57. Shoeman RL, Traub P (1990) The in vitro DNA-binding properties of purified nuclear lamin proteins and vimentin. J Biol Chem 265: 9055–9061. 58. Glass CA, Glass JR, Taniura H, Hasel KW, Blevitt JM, et al. (1993) The alpha- helical rod domain of human lamins A and C contains a chromatin binding site. EMBO J 12: 4413–4424. 59. Glass JR, Gerace L (1990) Lamins A and C bind and assemble at the surface of mitotic chromosomes. JCell Biol 111: 1047–1057. 60. Hoger TH, Krohne G, Kleinschmidt JA (1991) Interaction of Xenopus lamins A and L II with chromatin in vitro mediated by a sequence element in the carboxyterminal domain. Exp Cell Res 197: 280–289. 61. Taniura H, Glass C, Gerace L (1995) A chromatin binding site in the tail domain of nuclear lamins that interacts with core histones. JCell Biol 131: 33–44. 62. Yuan J, Simos G, Blobel G, Georgatos SD (1991) Binding of lamin A to polynucleosomes. J Biol Chem 266: 9211–9215. 63. Zhao K, Harel A, Stuurman N, Guedalia D, Gruenbaum Y (1996) Binding of matrix attachment regions to nuclear lamin is mediated by the rod domain and depends on the lamin polymerization state. FEBS Lett 380: 161–164. 64. Stierle V, Couprie J, Ostlund C, Krimm I, Zinn-Justin S, et al. (2003) The carboxyl-terminal region common to lamins A and C contains a DNA binding domain. Biochemistry 42: 4819–4828. 65. Broers JL, Ramaekers FC (2004) Dynamics of nuclear lamina assembly and disassembly. Symp Soc Exp Biol 56: 177–192. 66. Broers JLV, Machiels BM, van Eys GJJM, Kuijpers HJH, Manders EMM, et al. (1999) Dynamics of the nuclear lamina as monitored by GFP-tagged A-type lamins. J Cell Sci 112: 3463–3475. The Function of Drosophila Lamins Phosphorylation 67. Gant TM, Harris CA, Wilson KL (1999) Roles of LAP2 proteins in nuclear assembly and DNA replication: truncated LAP2beta proteins alter lamina assembly, envelope formation, nuclear size, and DNA replication efficiency in Xenopus laevis extracts. J Cell Biol 144: 1083–1096. 68. Riemer D, Stuurman N, Berrios M, Hunter C, Fisher PA, et al. (1995) Expression of Drosophila lamin C is developmentally regulated: analogies with vertebrate A-type lamins. J Cell Sci 108: 3189–3198. 69. Salpingidou G, Rzepecki R, Kiseleva E, Lyon C, Lane B, et al. (2008) NEP-A and NEP-B both contribute to nuclear pore formation in Xenopus eggs and oocytes. J Cell Sci 121: 706–716. 70. Pfaller R, Smythe C, Newport JW (1991) Assembly/disassembly of the nuclear envelope membrane: cell cycle-dependent binding of nuclear membrane vesicles to chromatin in vitro. Cell 65: 209–217. 71. Drummond S, Ferrigno P, Lyon C, Murphy J, Goldberg M, et al. (1999) Temporal Differences in the Appearance of NEP-B78 and an LBR-like Protein during Xenopus Nuclear Envelope Reassembly Reflect the ordered Recruitment of Functionally Discrete Vesicle Types. J Cell Biol 144: 225–240. 72. Chmielewska M, Dubin´ska-Magiera M, Sopel M, Rzepecka D, Hutchison CJ, et al. (2011) Embryonic and adult isoforms of XLAP2 form microdomains associated with chromatin and the nuclear envelope. Cell Tissue Res 344: 97–110. 73. Rzepecki R, Fisher PA (2000) During both interphase and mitosis, DNA topoisomerase II interacts with DNA as well as RNA through the protein’s C- terminal domain. J Cell Sci 113: 1635–1647. PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 15 February 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 2 | e32649