Acknowledgments We thank Dan Ariely for inspiring discussions and constructive comments. We especially thank Valentina Truppa and Francesco Natale for statistical advice and Tommaso Stegagno and Luigi Baciadonna for their assistance to make the video clips. We further thank the Fondazione Bioparco for hosting our Primate Centre, our keepers Massimiliano Bianchi and Simone Catarinacci, and our technician Luigi Fidanza. References 1. Deacon T (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Co., 527. 2. Fisher SE, Marcus GF (2006) The eloquent ape: genes brains and the evolution of language. Nature Rev Genet 7: 9–20. 3. DeLoache JS (2002a) The symbol-mindedness of young children. In: Hartup WW, Weinberg RA, eds (2002a) Child psychology in retrospect and prospect: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology. Mahwah: LEA Publishing. pp 73–101. 4. DeLoache JS (2002b) Early development of the understanding and use of symbolic artifacts. In: Goswami U, ed (2002b) Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell. pp 206–226. 5. DeLoache JS (2004) Becoming symbol-minded. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 66–70. 6. Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh DM, Boysen S (1978) Symbolic communi- cation between two chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Science 201: 641–644. 7. Savage-Rumbaugh ES (1986) Ape language: from conditioned response to symbol. New York: Columbia University Press. pp 433. 8. Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh DM, Smith ST, Lawson J (1980) Reference: The linguistic essential. Science 210: 922–925. 9. Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1995) Responses to quantity: Perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process A 21: 82–86. 10. Boysen ST, Berntson GG, Hannan MB, Cacioppo JT (1995) Quantity-based interference and symbolic representation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22: 76–86. 11. Boysen ST (2006) The impact of symbolic representations on chimpanzee cognition. In: Hurley S, Nudds M, eds (2006) Rational Animals?. New York: Oxford University Press. pp 489–511. 12. Addessi E, Crescimbene L, Visalberghi E (2007) Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols? Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 274: 2579–2585. 13. Addessi E, Crescimbene L, Visalberghi E (2008) Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 11: 275–282. 14. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2004) A concept of value during experimental exchange in brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Folia Primatol 75: 317–330. 15. Peirce CS (1931–58) Collected Writings (8 Vols.) Hartshorne C, Weiss P, Burks AW, eds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 16. Bates E (1979) Intentions, conventions, and symbols. In: Bates E, ed (1979) The emergence of symbols. Cognition and communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press. pp 33–68. 17. Brosnan SF, De Waal FB (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425: 297–299. Transitivity in Monkeys Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: EV EA AM LC. Performed the experiments: EA AM LC. Analyzed the data: EA AM LC CP. Wrote the paper: EV EA AM LC CP. 18. Dubreuil D, Gentile MS, Visalberghi E (2006) Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse? Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 273: 1223–1228. 19. Roma PG, Silberberg A, Ruggiero AM, Suomi SJ (2006) Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. J Comp Psychol 120: 67–73. 20. Chen MK, Lakshminaryanan V, Santos LR (2006) The evolution of our preferences: Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. J Polit Econ 114: 517–537. 21. Brosnan SF, Jones OD, Mareno MC, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, et al. (2007) Endowment effects in chimpanzees. Curr Biol 17: 1–4. 22. Padoa-Schioppa C, Assad JA (2006) Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value. Nature 441: 223–226. 23. Padoa-Schioppa C, Assad JA (2008) The representation of economic value in the orbitofrontal cortex is invariant for changes of menu. Nature Neurosci 11: 95–102. 24. Padoa-Schioppa C, Jandolo L, Visalberghi E (2006) Multi-stage mental process for economic choice in capuchins. Cognition 99: B1–B13. 25. Kreps DM (1990) A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 850. 26. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 625. 27. Werner H, Kaplan B (1963) Symbol formation: an organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: Wiley, 530. 28. Sigel IE (1970) The distancing hypothesis: a causal hypothesis for the acquisition of representational thought. In: Jones MR, ed (1970) Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior, 1968: Effects of Early Experience. Coral Gabbles: University of Miami Press. pp 99–118. 29. Sigel IE (1990) Journeys in serendipity: the development of the distancing model. In: Siegel IE, Brody GH, eds (1990) Methods of Family Research: Biographies of Research Projects: Vol. 1. Normal Families. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp 87–120. 30. Carlson SM, Davis AC, Leach JG (2005) Less is more: executive function and symbolic representation in preschool children. Psychol Sci 16: 609–616. 31. Ramseyer A, Pele M, Dufour V, Chauvin C, Thierry B (2006) Accepting loss: the temporal limits of reciprocity in brown capuchin monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 273: 179–184. 32. Schmandt-Besserat D (1978) The earliest precursor of writing. Sci Am 238: 50–58. 33. Mischel W, Baker N (1975) Cognitive transformations of reward objects through instructions. J Pers Soc Psychol 31: 254–261. 34. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez ML (1989) Delay of gratification in children. Science 244: 933–938. PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 8 June 2008 | Volume 3 | Issue 6 | e2414