To assess a possible variability within the pool of induced embryos, Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the labeling between litters (2 by 2) and the two extreme categories (the least labelled potentially not induced and the most labelled potentially too induced) were discarded. The statistical analysis, including the degrees of confidence (from p = 0.019 to p,0.0001), of the final library (64 labeling among 287 embryos) that confirms its validity is reported in Table 3. Acknowledgments We thank Valerie Wilson, Margaret Buckingham, Emilie Legue´, Estelle Hirsinger for their comments on the manuscript, Elena Tzouanacou for References 1. Rohde LA, Heisenberg CP (2007) Zebrafish gastrulation: cell movements, signals, and mechanisms. Int Rev Cytol 261: 159–192. 2. Keller R (2006) Mechanisms of elongation in embryogenesis. Development 133: 2291–2302. 3. Mathis L, Nicolas JF (2002) Cellular patterning of the vertebrate embryo. Trends Genet 18: 627–635. 4. Nielsen C (1995) Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press. 5. Valentine JW (2004) On the origin of phyla. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press. 6. Stern CD (2004) Gastrulation: from cells to embryo: John Inglis. 7. Lawson KA, Meneses JJ, Pedersen RA (1991) Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. Development 113: 891–911. 8. Beddington RS, Robertson EJ (1999) Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals. Cell 96: 195–209. 9. Petit AC, Legue´ E, Nicolas JF (2005) Methods in clonal analysis and applications. Reprod Nutr Dev 45: 321–339. 10. Stern CD, Fraser SE (2001) Tracing the lineage of tracing cell lineages. Nat Cell Biol 3: E216–218. 11. Bonnerot C, Nicolas JF (1993) Clonal analysis in the intact mouse embryo by intragenic homologous recombination. C R Acad Sci USA 316: 1207–1217. 12. Rolland-Lagan AG, Coen E, Impey SJ, Bangham JA (2005) A computational method for inferring growth parameters and shape changes during development based on clonal analysis. J Theor Biol 232: 157–177. 13. Lecuit T, Le Goff L (2007) Orchestrating size and shape during morphogenesis. Nature 450: 189–192. 14. Nicolas JF, Mathis L, Bonnerot C (1996) Evidence in the mouse for self- renewing stem cells in the formation of a segmented longitudinal structure, the myotome. Development 122: 2933–2946. 15. Mathis L, Bonnerot C, Puelles L, Nicolas JF (1997) Retrospective clonal analysis of the cerebellum using genetic laacz/lacz mouse mosaics. Development 124: 4089–4104. 16. Mathis L, Nicolas JF (2000) Different clonal dispersion in the rostral and caudal mouse central nervous system. Development 127: 1277–1290. 17. Eloy-Trinquet S, Nicolas JF (2002a) Clonal separation and regionalisation during formation of the medial and lateral myotomes in the mouse embryo. Development 129: 111–122. 18. Eloy-Trinquet S, Nicolas JF (2002b) Cell coherence during production of the presomitic mesoderm and somitogenesis in the mouse embryo. Development 129: 3609–3619. 19. Meilhac SM, Esner M, Kelly RG, Nicolas JF, Buckingham ME (2004) The clonal origin of myocardial cells in different regions of the embryonic mouse heart. Dev Cell 6: 685–698. 20. Legue´ E, Nicolas JF (2005) Hair follicle renewal : organization of stem cells in the matrix and the role of stereotyped lineages and behaviors. Development 132: 4143–4154. 21. Rolland-Lagan AG, Bangham JA, Coen E (2003) Growth dynamics underlying petal shape and asymmetry. Nature 422: 161–163. 22. Mathis L, Nicolas JF (1998) Autonomous cell labelling using LaacZ reporter transgenes to produce genetic mosaics during development. In: Garcia ACaA, ed. Microinjections and transgenesis Strategies and protocols Springer-Verlag. pp 439–458. 23. Eloy-Trinquet S, Mathis L, Nicolas JF (2000) Retrospective tracing of the developmental lineage of the mouse myotome. Curr Top Dev Biol 47: 33–80. 24. Tzouanacou E, Wegener A, Wilson V, Nicolas JF (2009) Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis, Submitted. 25. Joyner AL, Zervas M (2006) Genetic inducible fate mapping in mouse: establishing genetic lineages and defining genetic neuroanatomy in the nervous system. Dev Dyn 235: 2376–2385. 26. Soriano P (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21: 70–71. Surface Ectoderm Morphogenesis the R26LaacZ1.1 line, Christine Mariette for her contribution to the inductive system, Suzanne Capgras and Pascal Dardenne for excellent technical assistance, Lars Grotewold, Austin Smith and Philippe Soriano for mice, Pierre-Etienne Bost and Yves Janin for help in the protocol of 4- OHT solubilization, Kirstie Lawson for discussions. Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: ACP JFN. Performed the experiments: ACP. Analyzed the data: ACP JFN. Wrote the paper: ACP JFN. 27. Eberle AB, Stalder L, Mathys H, Orozco RZ, Muhlemann O (2008) Posttranscriptional gene regulation by spatial rearrangement of the 39 untranslated region. PLoS Biol 6: e92. 28. Sanes J, Rubenstein J, Nicolas JF (1986) Use of a recombinant retrovirus to study post-implantation cell lineage in mouse embryos. EMBO J 5: 3133–3142. 29. Zong H, Espinosa JS, Su HH, Muzumdar MD, Luo L (2005) Mosaic analysis with double markers in mice. Cell 121: 479–492. 30. Guo Q, Loomis C, Joyner AL (2003) Fate map of mouse ventral limb ectoderm and the apical ectodermal ridge. Dev Biol 264: 166–178. 31. Indra AK, Warot X, Brocard J, Bornert JM, Xiao JH, et al. (1999) Temporally- controlled site-specific mutagenesis in the basal layer of the epidermis: comparison of the recombinase activity of the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ER(T) and Cre-ER(T2) recombinases. Nuc Acids Res 27: 4324–4327. 32. Feil R, Brocard J, Mascrez B, LeMeur M, Metzger D, et al. (1996) Ligand- activated site-specific recombination in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 10887–10890. 33. Vooijs M, Jonkers J, Berns A (2001) A highly efficient ligand-regulated Cre recombinase mouse line shows that LoxP recombination is position dependent. Embo J 2: 292–297. 34. Mathis L, Nicolas J-F (1997) Analyse clonale re´trospective chez les verte´bre´s : me´thodes, concepts et re´sultats. Annales de l’Institut Pasteur/Actualite´s 8: 3–17. 35. Clayton E, Doupe DP, Klein AM, Winton DJ, Simons BD, et al. (2007) A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Nature 446: 185–189. 36. Petit AC (2008) Cellular strategies in the building of the mouse surface ectoderm [PhD]: Universite´ Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6. 37. Hayashi S, McMahon AP (2002) Efficient recombination in diverse tissues by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre: a tool for temporally regulated gene activation/inactivation in the mouse. Dev Biol 244: 305–318. 38. Kemp R, Ireland H, Clayton E, Houghton C, Howard L, et al. (2004) Elimination of background recombination: somatic induction of Cre by combined transcriptional regulation and hormone binding affinity. Nucleic Acids Res 32: e92. 39. Gardner RL, Lawrence PA (1985) Single cell marking and cell lineage in animal development. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B312: 1–187. 40. Luskin MB, Pearlman AL, Sanes JR (1988) Cell lineage in the cerebral cortex of the mouse studied in vivo and in vitro with a recombinant retrovirus. Neuron 1: 635–647. 41. Kornack DR, Rakic P (1995) Radial and horizontal deployment of clonally related cells in the primate neocortex : relationship to distinct mitotic lineages. Neuron 15: 311–321. 42. Fischer E, Legue E, Doyen A, Nato F, Nicolas JF, et al. (2006) Defective planar cell polarity in polycystic kidney disease. Nat Genet 38: 21–23. 43. Jung AC, Denholm B, Skaer H, Affolter M (2005) Renal tubule development in Drosophila: a closer look at the cellular level. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 322–328. 44. Solnica-Krezel L (2005) Conserved patterns of cell movements during vertebrate gastrulation. Curr Biol 15: R213–228. 45. Keller R, Davidson L, Edlund A, Elul T, Ezin M, et al. (2000) Mechanisms of convergence and extension by cell intercalation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 355: 897–922. 46. Klein TJ, Mlodzik M (2005) Planar cell polarization: an emerging model points in the right direction. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21: 155–176. 47. Glickman NS, Kimmel CB, Jones MA, Adams RJ (2003) Shaping the zebrafish notochord. Development 130: 873–887. 48. Keller R (2002) Shaping the vertebrate body plan by polarized embryonic cell movements. Science 298: 1950–1954. 49. Kibar Z, Vogan KJ, Groulx N, Justice MJ, Underhill DA, et al. (2001) Ltap, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Strabismus/Van Gogh, is altered in the mouse neural tube mutant Loop-tail. Nat Genet 28: 251–255. 50. Wang J, Hamblet NS, Mark S, Dickinson ME, Brinkman BC, et al. (2006) Dishevelled genes mediate a conserved mammalian PCP pathway to regulate convergent extension during neurulation. Development 133: 1767–1778. 51. Raff RA, Sly BJ (2000) Modularity and dissociation in the evolution of gene expression territories in development. Evol Dev 2: 102–113. PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 14 February 2009 | Volume 4 | Issue 2 | e4353