BMC Cancer 2009, 9:254 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/254 48. Cendán JC, Coco D, Copeland EM 3rd: Accuracy of intraopera- tive frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy- bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 2005, 201:194-198. 49. Dooley WC, Parker J: Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins. Am J Surg 2005, 190:606-608. 50. Nadeem R, Chagla LS, Harris O, Desmond S, Thind R, Titterrell C, Audisio RA: Occult breast lesions: A comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL). Breast 2005, 14:283-289. 51. Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, Sun P, Lickley HL, McCready DR, Holloway CM: The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving sur- gery for cancer. Breast J 2006, 12:331-337. 52. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N: A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast- conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006, 13:333-339. 53. Huston TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, Tousimis E: The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving sur- gery. Am J Surg 2006, 192:509-512. 54. Janes SE, Stankhe M, Singh S, Isgar B: Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast con- serving surgery. Breast 2006, 15:326-330. 55. Méndez JE, Lamorte WW, de Las Morenas A, Cerda S, Pistey R, King T, Kavanah M, Hirsch E, Stone MD: Influence of breast cancer margin assessment method on the rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma. Am J Surg 2006, 192:538-540. 56. Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Singletary SE, Whitman GJ, Ross MI, Ames FC, Feig BW, Buchholz TA, Meric- Bernstam F: Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:1458-1471. 57. Kotwall C, Ranson M, Stiles A, Hamann MS: Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision. Am Surg 2007, 73:337-343. 58. Smitt MC, Horst K: Association of clinical and pathologic vari- ables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoper- ative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:1040-1044. 59. Wright MJ, Park J, Fey JV, Park A, O'Neill A, Tan LK, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd, Van Zee KJ, King TA: Perpendicular inked versus tan- gential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: does the method matter? J Am Coll Surg 2007, 204:541-549. 60. Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, Myers C, Hill AD, O'Doherty A, Quinn CM: Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Pathol 2008, 21:39-45. 61. Jacobson AF, Asad J, Boolbol SK, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Feld- man SM: Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpec- tomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Am J Surg 2008, 196:556-558. 62. Schiller DE, Le LW, Cho BC, Youngson BJ, McCready DR: Factors associated with negative margins of lumpectomy specimen: potential use in selecting patients for intraoperative radio- therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008, 15:833-842. 63. Soucy G, Bélanger J, Leblanc G, Sideris L, Drolet P, Mitchell A, Leclerc YE, Dufresne MP, Beaudet J, Dubé P: Surgical margins in breast- conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: does neoad- juvant chemotherapy have an impact? J Am Coll Surg 2008, 206:1116-1121. 64. Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, Simunovic M: The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. Am J Surg 2009, 197:740-746. 65. Sabel MS, Rogers K, Griffith K, Jagsi R, Kleer CG, Diehl KA, Breslin TM, Cimmino VM, Chang AE, Newman LA: Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol 2009, 99:99-103. 66. Tengher-Barna I, Hequet D, Reboul-Marty J, Frassati-Biaggi A, Seince N, Rodrigues-Faure A, Uzan M, Ziol M: Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin per- formed at the time of breast lumpectomy. Mod Pathol 2009, 22:299-305. 67. Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda E, Aldrighi CM, Filassi JR, Piato JR, Prado LC, Aldrighi JM, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC: Immediate recon- struction following breast-conserving surgery: Management of the positive surgical margins and influence on secondary reconstruction. Breast 2009, 18:47-54. 68. Hewes JC, Imkampe A, Haji A, Bates T: Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery. Br J Surg 2009, 96:47-53. 69. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH: Histologic multi- focality of Tis, T1–2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clin- ical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985, 56:979-990. 70. Johnson JE, Page DL, Winfield AC, Reynolds VH, Sawyers JL: Recur- rent mammary carcinoma after local excision. A segmental problem. Cancer 1995, 75:1612-1618. 71. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH: Histologic multi- focality of Tis, T1–2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clin- ical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985, 56:979-990. 72. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Recht A, Silver B, Harris JR: Breast relapse following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer. II. Detection, pathologic features and prognostic signifi- cance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985, 11:1277-1284. 73. Kurtz JM, Amalric R, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Jacquemier J, Pietra JC, Hans D, Pollet JF, Bressac C, Spitalier JM: Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Frequency, time course, and prognosis. Cancer 1989, 63:1912-1917. 74. Fowble B, Solin LJ, Schultz DJ, Rubenstein J, Goodman RL: Breast recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation: patterns of failure, prognosis, and pathologic findings from mastectomy specimens with implications for treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990, 19:833-842. 75. Vicini FA, Recht A, Abner A, Boyages J, Cady B, Connolly JL, Gelman R, Osteen RT, Schnitt SJ, Silen W, Harris JR: Recurrence in the breast following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992, 11:33-39. 76. Komoike Y, Akiyama F, Iino Y, Ikeda T, Tanaka-Akashi S, Ohsumi S, Kusama M, Sano M, Shin E, Suemasu K, Sonoo H, Taguchi T, Nishi T, Nishimura R, Haga S, Mise K, Kinoshita T, Murakami S, Yoshimoto M, Tsukuma H, Inaji H: Analysis of ipsilateral breast tumor recur- rences after breast-conserving treatment based on the clas- sification of true recurrences and new primary tumors. Breast Cancer 2005, 12:104-111. 77. Olson TP, Harter J, Muñoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin T: Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast- conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:2953-2960. 78. Marudanayagam R, Singhal R, Tanchel B, O'Connor B, Balasubrama- nian B, Paterson I: Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery. Breast J 2008, 14:570-573. 79. Fedorcik GG, Sachs R, Goldfarb MA: Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm mar- gins in 100 consecutive patients. Breast J 2006, 12:208-211. 80. von Smitten K: Margin status after breast-conserving treat- ment of breast cancer: how much free margin is enough? J Surg Oncol 2008, 98:585-587. 81. Guidi AJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ: The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens. Cancer 1997, 79:1568-1573. 82. Pourquier D, Lemanski C, Kamar A: Lumpectomy margins and much more. Cancer 1998, 82:2289-2293. 83. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Katz J, Rothschild J, Safaii H, Supran S: The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of mar- gin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002, 184:89-93. 84. Jimenez RE, Bongers S, Bouwman D, Segel M, Visscher DW: Clinico- pathologic significance of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies with invasive cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2000, 24:123-128. 85. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Khettry U, Mazoujian G, Brenner M, Silver B, Recht A, Beadle G, Harris JR: Pathologic findings on re-excision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy. Cancer 1987, 59:675-681. 86. Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, Ruthazer R, Kramer B, Safaii H, Graham R: The value of breast lumpectomy margin Page 22 of 23 (page number not for citation purposes)