van Rijssen et al. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:666 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/666 enhancement goals on stereotyping. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2009, 35:101-113. 4. Alter AL, Darley JM: When the association between appearance and outcome contaminates social judgment: a bidirectional model linking group homogeneity and collective treatment. J Pers Soc Psychol 2009, 97:776-795. 5. Van Brakel WH: Measuring health-related stigma - a literature review. Psychol Health Med 2006, 11:307-334. 6. Butz DA, Plant EA: Prejudice control and interracial relations: the role of motivation to respond without prejudice. J Pers 2009, 77:1311-1341. 7. Burgess DJ, Van Ryn M, Crowley-Matoka M, Malat J: Understanding the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in pain treatment: insights from dual process models of stereotyping. Pain Med 2006, 7:119-134. 8. Bos AE, Schaalma HP, Pryor JB: Reducing AIDS-related stigma in developing countries: the importance of theory- and evidence-based interventions. Psychol Health Med 2008, 13:450-460. 9. Dodor EA, Kelly S, Neal K: Health professionals as stigmatisers of tuberculosis: insights from community members and patients with TB in an urban district in Ghana. Psychol Health Med 2009, 14:301-310. 10. Burgess DJ, Fu SS, Van Ryn M: Why do providers contribute to disparities and what can be done about it? J Gen Intern Med 2004, 19:1154-1159. 11. Ryan CS, Robinson DR, Hausmann LR: Stereotyping among providers and consumers of public mental health services. The role of perceived group variability. Behav Modif 2001, 25:406-442. 12. Bonilauri Ferreira AP, Ferreira RF, Rajgor D, Shah J, Menezes A, Pietrobon R: Clinical reasoning in the real world is mediated by bounded rationality: implications for diagnostic clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One 2010, 5: e10265. 13. Croskerry P: A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med 2009, 84:1022-1028. 14. Link BG, Phelan JC: Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 2001, 27:363-385. 15. Van Rijssen HJ, Schellart AJ, Anema JR, Van der Beek AJ: A theoretical framework to describe communication processes during medical disability assessment interviews. BMC Public Health 2009, 9:375. 16. Van Rijssen HJ, Schellart AJ, Anema JR, Van der Beek AJ: A typology of sick- listed claimants to improve communication skills for social insurance physicians during medical disability assessment interviews. J Occup Rehabil 2010. 17. Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research Chicago: Aldine; 1967. 18. Strauss AL, Corbin J: Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998. 19. Boeije HR: Towards a purposeful approach of the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity 2002, 36:391-409. 20. Freedman MB, Leary TF, Ossorio AG, Coffey HS: The interpersonal dimension of personality. J Pers 1951, 20:143-161. 21. Leary T: Commentary. J Pers Assess 1996, 66:301-307. 22. Wiggins JS: An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex tradition. J Pers Assess 1996, 66:217-233. 23. Van Ryn M, Fu SS: Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health? Am J Public Health 2003, 93:248-255. 24. Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM: Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57:1707-1722. 25. Balsa AI, McGuire TG: Prejudice, clinical uncertainty and stereotyping as sources of health disparities. J Health Econ 2003, 22:89-116. 26. Sinclair S, Pappas J, Lun J: The interpersonal basis of stereotype-relevant self-views. J Pers 2009, 77:1343-1364. 27. Safran DG, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR, McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr: Gender differences in medical treatment: the case of physician-prescribed activity restrictions. Soc Sci Med 1997, 45:711-722. 28. Beagan BL, Kumas-Tan Z: Approaches to diversity in family medicine: “I have always tried to be colour blind”. Can Fam Physician 2009, 55: e21-e28. 29. Heijnders M, Van der Meij S: The fight against stigma: an overview of stigma-reduction strategies and interventions. Psychol Health Med 2006, 11:353-363. Page 13 of 13 30. Montgomery K: Thinking about thinking: implications for patient safety. Healthc Q 2009, 12 Spec No Patient:e191-e194. 31. Halpern J: What is clinical empathy? J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:670-674. 32. Stepien KA, Baernstein A: Educating for empathy. A review. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21:524-530. 33. De Boer WEL, Besseling JJM, Willems JHBM: Organisation of disability evaluation in 15 countries. Prat Organ Soins 2007, 38:205-217[http://www. doaj.org/doaj?func=abstract&id=240001]. 34. Spanjer J, Krol B, Popping R, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S: Disability assessment interview: the role of detailed information on functioning in addition to medical history-taking. J Rehabil Med 2009, 41:267-272. 35. Spanjer J, Krol B, Brouwer S, Groothoff JW: Inter-rater reliability in disability assessment based on a semi-structured interview report. Disabil Rehabil 2008, 30:1885-1890. Pre-publication history The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/666/prepub doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-666 Cite this article as: van Rijssen et al.: Stereotyping of medical disability claimants’ communication behaviour by physicians: towards more focused education for social insurance physicians. BMC Public Health 2010 10:666. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: • Convenient online submission • Thorough peer review • No space constraints or color ﬁgure charges • Immediate publication on acceptance • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar • Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit