alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: Lateral movement indicators for SyncAppvPublishingServer
Matching passage: T1216.002 SyncAppvPublishingServer. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may abuse SyncAppvPublishingServer.vbs to proxy execution of malicious [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) commands. SyncAppvPublishingServer.vbs is a Visual Basic script associated with how Windows virtualizes applications (Microsoft Application Virtualization, or App-V).(Citation: 1 - appv) For example, Windows may render Win32 applications to users as virtual applications, allowing users to launch and interact with them as if they were installed locally.(Citation: 2 - appv)(Citation: 3 - appv) The SyncAppvPublishingServer.vbs script is legitimate, may be signed by Microsoft, and is commonly executed from `\System32` through the command line via `wscript.exe`.(Citation: 4 - appv)(Citation: 5 - appv) Adversaries may abuse SyncAppvPublishingServer.vbs to bypass [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) execution restrictions and evade defensive counter measures by "living off the land."(Citation: 6 - appv)(Citation: 4 - appv) Proxying execution may function as a trusted/signed alternative to directly invoking `powershell.exe`.(Citation: 7 - appv) For example, [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) commands may be invoked using:(Citation: 5 - appv) `SyncAppvPublishingServer.vbs "n; {PowerShell}"`
Near-miss passage: T1216 System Script Proxy Execution. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may use trusted scripts, often signed with certificates, to proxy the execution of malicious files. Several Microsoft signed scripts that have been downloaded from Microsoft or are default on Windows installations can be used to proxy execution of other files.(Citation: LOLBAS Project) This behavior may be abused by adversaries to execute malicious files that could bypass application control and signature validation on systems.(Citation: GitHub Ultimate AppLocker Bypass List)
Query: telemetry for T1601
Matching passage: T1601 Modify System Image. Tactics: defense impairment. Description: Adversaries may make changes to the operating system of embedded network devices to weaken defenses and provide new capabilities for themselves. On such devices, the operating systems are typically monolithic and most of the device functionality and capabilities are contained within a single file. To change the operating system, the adversary typically only needs to affect this one file, replacing or modifying it. This can either be done live in memory during system runtime for immediate effect, or in storage to implement the change on the next boot of the network device.
Near-miss passage: T1601.001 Patch System Image. Tactics: defense impairment. Description: Adversaries may modify the operating system of a network device to introduce new capabilities or weaken existing defenses.(Citation: Killing the myth of Cisco IOS rootkits) (Citation: Killing IOS diversity myth) (Citation: Cisco IOS Shellcode) (Citation: Cisco IOS Forensics Developments) (Citation: Juniper Netscreen of the Dead) Some network devices are built with a monolithic architecture, where the entire operating system and most of the functionality of the device is contained within a single file. Adversaries may change this file in storage, to be loaded in a future boot, or in memory during runtime. To change the operating system in storage, the adversary will typically use the standard procedures available to device operators. This may involve downloading a new file via typical protocols used on network devices, such as TFTP, FTP, SCP, or a console connection. The original file may be overwritten, or a new file may be written alongside of it and the device reconfigured to boot to the compromised image. To change the operating system in memory, the adversary typically can use one of two methods. In the first, the adversary would make use of native debug commands in the original, unaltered running operating system that allow them to directly modify the relevant memory addresses containing the running operating system. This method typically requires administrative level access to the device. In the second method for changing the operating system in memory, the adversary would make use of the boot loader. The boot loader is the first piece of software that loads when the device starts that, in turn, will launch the operating system. Adversaries may use malicious code previously implanted in the boot loader, such as through the [ROMMONkit](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1542/004) method, to directly manipulate running operating system code in memory. This malicious code in the bootloader provides the capability of direct memory manipulation to the adversary,
Query: vulnerability: Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in MySql Lite Administrator (mysql-lite-administrator) beta-1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5064. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in MySql Lite Administrator (mysql-lite-administrator) beta-1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the table_name parameter to (1) tabella.php, (2) coloni.php, or (3) insert.php or (4) num_row parameter to coloni.php.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0896. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in eXtplorer before 2.1.7 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Query: SOC alert related to Masquerade Task or Service
Matching passage: T1036.004 Masquerade Task or Service. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may attempt to manipulate the name of a task or service to make it appear legitimate or benign. Tasks/services executed by the Task Scheduler or systemd will typically be given a name and/or description.(Citation: TechNet Schtasks)(Citation: Systemd Service Units) Windows services will have a service name as well as a display name. Many benign tasks and services exist that have commonly associated names. Adversaries may give tasks or services names that are similar or identical to those of legitimate ones. Tasks or services contain other fields, such as a description, that adversaries may attempt to make appear legitimate.(Citation: Palo Alto Shamoon Nov 2016)(Citation: Fysbis Dr Web Analysis)
Near-miss passage: T1036.002 Right-to-Left Override. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may abuse the right-to-left override (RTLO or RLO) character (U+202E) to disguise a string and/or file name to make it appear benign. RTLO is a non-printing Unicode character that causes the text that follows it to be displayed in reverse. For example, a Windows screensaver executable named <code>March 25 \u202Excod.scr</code> will display as <code>March 25 rcs.docx</code>. A JavaScript file named <code>photo_high_re\u202Egnp.js</code> will be displayed as <code>photo_high_resj.png</code>.(Citation: Infosecinstitute RTLO Technique) Adversaries may abuse the RTLO character as a means of tricking a user into executing what they think is a benign file type. A common use of this technique is with [Spearphishing Attachment](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566/001)/[Malicious File](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1204/002) since it can trick both end users and defenders if they are not aware of how their tools display and render the RTLO character. Use of the RTLO character has been seen in many targeted intrusion attempts and criminal activity.(Citation: Trend Micro PLEAD RTLO)(Citation: Kaspersky RTLO Cyber Crime) RTLO can be used in the Windows Registry as well, where regedit.exe displays the reversed characters but the command line tool reg.exe does not by default.
Query: risk of Use-after-free vulnerability in the SkMatrix::invertNonIdentity function in core/SkMatrix.cpp in Skia, as used in Google Chrome before 45.0.2454.85, allows remote attackers to caus
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1294. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. Use-after-free vulnerability in the SkMatrix::invertNonIdentity function in core/SkMatrix.cpp in Skia, as used in Google Chrome before 45.0.2454.85, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact by triggering the use of matrix elements that lead to an infinite result during an inversion calculation.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2087. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 6.5. Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in the Avatar Uploader module before 6.x-1.3 for Drupal allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code by uploading a file with a PHP extension, then accessing it via unspecified vectors.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-3093
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3093. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.289 and 14.x through 17.x before 17.0.0.188 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.460 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 17.0.0.172, Adobe AIR SDK before 17.0.0.172, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 17.0.0.172 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-3078, CVE-2015-3089, and CVE-2015-3090.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6284. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. Buffer overflow in the Conference Control Protocol API implementation in Cisco TelePresence Server software before 4.1(2.33) on 7010, MSE 8710, Multiparty Media 310 and 320, and Virtual Machine devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCuu28277.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-5465
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5465. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. Silicon Integrated Systems WindowsXP Display Manager (aka VGA Driver Manager and VGA Display Manager) 6.14.10.3930 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted (1) 0x96002400 or (2) 0x96002404 IOCTL call.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2616. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.900000095367432. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Sun Solaris 3.3 and 4.2 allows local users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to DevFS.
Query: detect Detects process injection using the signed Windows tool "Mavinject" via the "INJECTRUNNING" flag in logs
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects process injection using the signed Windows tool "Mavinject" via the "INJECTRUNNING" flag. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Mavinject Inject DLL Into Running Process id: 4f73421b-5a0b-4bbf-a892-5a7fb99bea66 related: - id: 17eb8e57-9983-420d-ad8a-2c4976c22eb8 type: obsolete status: test description: Detects process injection using the signed Windows tool "Mavinject" via the "INJECTRUNNING" flag references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1218/T1218.md - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1056.004/T1056.004.md - https://posts.specterops.io/mavinject-exe-functionality-deconstructed-c29ab2cf5c0e - https://twitter.com/gN3mes1s/status/941315826107510784 - https://reaqta.com/2017/12/mavinject-microsoft-injector/ - https://twitter.com/Hexacorn/status/776122138063409152 - https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/issues/3742 - https://github.com/keyboardcrunch/SentinelOne-ATTACK-Queries/blob/6a228d23eefe963ca81f2d52f94b815f61ef5ee0/Tactics/DefenseEvasion.md#t1055-process-injection author: frack113, Florian Roth date: 2021-07-12 modified: 2022-12-05 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth - attack.t1055.001 - attack.t1218.013 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: CommandLine|contains: ' /INJECTRUNNING ' filter: ParentImage: C:\Windows\System32\AppVClient.exe condition: selection and not filter falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Generic rule for SQL exceptions in Python according to PEP 249. Logsource: python / application. Rule: title: Python SQL Exceptions id: 19aefed0-ffd4-47dc-a7fc-f8b1425e84f9 status: stable description: Generic rule for SQL exceptions in Python according to PEP 249 references: - https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/#exceptions author: Thomas Patzke date: 2017-08-12 modified: 2020-09-01 tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1190 logsource: category: application product: python detection: keywords: - DataError - IntegrityError - ProgrammingError - OperationalError condition: keywords falsepositives: - Application bugs level: medium
Query: what is T1037.001
Matching passage: T1037.001 Logon Script (Windows). Tactics: persistence, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may use Windows logon scripts automatically executed at logon initialization to establish persistence. Windows allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or group of users log into a system.(Citation: TechNet Logon Scripts) This is done via adding a path to a script to the <code>HKCU\Environment\UserInitMprLogonScript</code> Registry key.(Citation: Hexacorn Logon Scripts) Adversaries may use these scripts to maintain persistence on a single system. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or an administrator account may be necessary.
Near-miss passage: T1037.005 Startup Items. Tactics: persistence, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may use startup items automatically executed at boot initialization to establish persistence. Startup items execute during the final phase of the boot process and contain shell scripts or other executable files along with configuration information used by the system to determine the execution order for all startup items.(Citation: Startup Items) This is technically a deprecated technology (superseded by [Launch Daemon](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1543/004)), and thus the appropriate folder, <code>/Library/StartupItems</code> isn’t guaranteed to exist on the system by default, but does appear to exist by default on macOS Sierra. A startup item is a directory whose executable and configuration property list (plist), <code>StartupParameters.plist</code>, reside in the top-level directory. An adversary can create the appropriate folders/files in the StartupItems directory to register their own persistence mechanism.(Citation: Methods of Mac Malware Persistence) Additionally, since StartupItems run during the bootup phase of macOS, they will run as the elevated root user.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-5990
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5990. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Belkin F9K1102 2 devices with firmware 2.10.17 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5595. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.5. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin.php in Zenphoto before 1.4.9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admin users for requests that may cause a denial of service (resource consumption).
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-4992
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4992. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 3.5. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2 before 5020500_8 allows remote authenticated users to conduct clickjacking attacks via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2472. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) through 8.1 in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 does not properly verify certificates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof clients via a crafted certificate with valid Issuer and Serial Number fields, aka "Remote Desktop Session Host Spoofing Vulnerability."
Query: exploit WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 6.2.4, 7.x before 7.1.4, and 8.x before 8.0.4, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corrupt
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1070. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 6.2.4, 7.x before 7.1.4, and 8.x before 8.0.4, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2015-03-17-1.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6324. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 7.099999904632568. The DHCPv6 relay implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software 9.0 before 9.0(4.37), 9.1 before 9.1(6.6), 9.2 before 9.2(4), 9.3 before 9.3(3.5), and 9.4 before 9.4(2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted DHCPv6 packets, aka Bug IDs CSCus56252 and CSCus57142.
Query: Persistence mechanism resembling Domains
Matching passage: T1584.001 Domains. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may hijack domains and/or subdomains that can be used during targeting. Domain registration hijacking is the act of changing the registration of a domain name without the permission of the original registrant.(Citation: ICANNDomainNameHijacking) Adversaries may gain access to an email account for the person listed as the owner of the domain. The adversary can then claim that they forgot their password in order to make changes to the domain registration. Other possibilities include social engineering a domain registration help desk to gain access to an account, taking advantage of renewal process gaps, or compromising a cloud service that enables managing domains (e.g., AWS Route53).(Citation: Krebs DNS Hijack 2019) Subdomain hijacking can occur when organizations have DNS entries that point to non-existent or deprovisioned resources. In such cases, an adversary may take control of a subdomain to conduct operations with the benefit of the trust associated with that domain.(Citation: Microsoft Sub Takeover 2020) Adversaries who compromise a domain may also engage in domain shadowing by creating malicious subdomains under their control while keeping any existing DNS records. As service will not be disrupted, the malicious subdomains may go unnoticed for long periods of time.(Citation: Palo Alto Unit 42 Domain Shadowing 2022)
Near-miss passage: T1584.006 Web Services. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise access to third-party web services that can be used during targeting. A variety of popular websites exist for legitimate users to register for web-based services, such as GitHub, Twitter, Dropbox, Google, SendGrid, etc. Adversaries may try to take ownership of a legitimate user's access to a web service and use that web service as infrastructure in support of cyber operations. Such web services can be abused during later stages of the adversary lifecycle, such as during Command and Control ([Web Service](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1102)), [Exfiltration Over Web Service](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1567), or [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566).(Citation: Recorded Future Turla Infra 2020) Using common services, such as those offered by Google or Twitter, makes it easier for adversaries to hide in expected noise. By utilizing a web service, particularly when access is stolen from legitimate users, adversaries can make it difficult to physically tie back operations to them. Additionally, leveraging compromised web-based email services may allow adversaries to leverage the trust associated with legitimate domains.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-5884
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5884. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 3.299999952316284. The Mail Drop feature in Mail in Apple OS X before 10.11 mishandles encryption parameters for attachments, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network during transmission of an S/MIME e-mail message with a large attachment.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3058. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via unspecified vectors.
Query: alert when Dependabot performs a scan to detect insecure dependencies, and sends Dependabot alerts. This rule detects when an organ
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Dependabot performs a scan to detect insecure dependencies, and sends Dependabot alerts. This rule detects when an organ. Logsource: github / audit. Rule: title: Outdated Dependency Or Vulnerability Alert Disabled id: 34e1c7d4-0cd5-419d-9f1b-1dad3f61018d status: test description: 'Dependabot performs a scan to detect insecure dependencies, and sends Dependabot alerts. This rule detects when an organization owner disables Dependabot alerts private repositories or Dependabot security updates for all repositories. ' author: Muhammad Faisal (@faisalusuf) date: 2023-01-27 references: - https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-alerts/about-dependabot-alerts - https://docs.github.com/en/organizations/keeping-your-organization-secure/managing-security-settings-for-your-organization/managing-security-and-analysis-settings-for-your-organization tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1195.001 logsource: product: github service: audit definition: 'Requirements: The audit log streaming feature must be enabled to be able to receive such logs. You can enable following the documentation here: https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/admin/monitoring-activity-in-your-enterprise/reviewing-audit-logs-for-your-enterprise/streaming-the-audit-log-for-your-enterprise#setting-up-audit-log-streaming' detection: selection: action: - dependabot_alerts_new_repos.disable - dependabot_alerts.disable - dependabot_security_updates_new_repos.disable - dependabot_security_updates.disable - repository_vulnerability_alerts.disable condition: selection falsepositives: - Approved changes by the Organization owner. Please validate the 'actor' if authorized to make the changes. level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential Amazon SSM agent hijack attempts as outlined in the Mitiga research report.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Amazon SSM Agent Hijacking id: d20ee2f4-822c-4827-9e15-41500b1fff10 status: test description: Detects potential Amazon SSM agent hijack attempts as outlined in the Mitiga research report. references: - https://www.mitiga.io/blog/mitiga-security-advisory-abusing-the-ssm-agent-as-a-remote-access-trojan - https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/amazons-aws-ssm-agent-can-be-used-as-post-exploitation-rat-malware/ - https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2023/08/02/aws-instances-attackers-access/ author: Muhammad Faisal date: 2023-08-02 tags: - attack.command-and-control - attack.persistence - attack.t1219.002 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: Image|endswith: \amazon-ssm-agent.exe CommandLine|contains|all: - '-register ' - '-code ' - '-id ' - '-region ' condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate activity of system administrators level: medium