alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: detection rule: Detects DNS queries for anonfiles.com, which is an anonymous file upload platform often used for malicious purposes
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects DNS queries for anonfiles.com, which is an anonymous file upload platform often used for malicious purposes. Logsource: windows / dns-client. Rule: title: DNS Query for Anonfiles.com Domain - DNS Client id: 29f171d7-aa47-42c7-9c7b-3c87938164d9 related: - id: 065cceea-77ec-4030-9052-fc0affea7110 type: similar status: test description: Detects DNS queries for anonfiles.com, which is an anonymous file upload platform often used for malicious purposes references: - https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/security/news/ransomware-spotlight/ransomware-spotlight-blackbyte author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-01-16 tags: - attack.exfiltration - attack.t1567.002 logsource: product: windows service: dns-client definition: 'Requirements: Microsoft-Windows-DNS Client Events/Operational Event Log must be enabled/collected in order to receive the events.' detection: selection: EventID: 3008 QueryName|contains: .anonfiles.com condition: selection falsepositives: - Rare legitimate access to anonfiles.com level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects external disk drives or plugged-in USB devices.. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: External Disk Drive Or USB Storage Device Was Recognized By The System id: f69a87ea-955e-4fb4-adb2-bb9fd6685632 status: test description: Detects external disk drives or plugged-in USB devices. references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-10/security/threat-protection/auditing/event-6416 author: Keith Wright date: 2019-11-20 modified: 2024-02-09 tags: - attack.t1091 - attack.t1200 - attack.lateral-movement - attack.initial-access logsource: product: windows service: security detection: selection_eid: EventID: 6416 selection_field: - ClassName: DiskDrive - DeviceDescription: USB Mass Storage Device condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Likely level: low
Query: exploit Serialized-object interfaces in certain IBM analytics, business solutions, cognitive, IT infrastructure, and mobile and social products allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7450. CWE: CWE-502. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Serialized-object interfaces in certain IBM analytics, business solutions, cognitive, IT infrastructure, and mobile and social products allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the InvokerTransformer class in the Apache Commons Collections library.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4852. CWE: CWE-502. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in T3 protocol traffic to TCP port 7001, related to oracle_common/modules/com.bea.core.apache.commons.collections.jar. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is limited to the WebLogic Server product.
Query: Sigma YAML for windows / process_creation
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects certain parent child patterns found in cases in which a web shell is used to perform certain credential dumping. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Webshell Hacking Activity Patterns id: 4ebc877f-4612-45cb-b3a5-8e3834db36c9 status: test description: 'Detects certain parent child patterns found in cases in which a web shell is used to perform certain credential dumping or exfiltration activities on a compromised system ' references: - https://youtu.be/7aemGhaE9ds?t=641 author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-03-17 modified: 2023-11-09 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.discovery - attack.t1505.003 - attack.t1018 - attack.t1033 - attack.t1087 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_webserver_image: ParentImage|endswith: - \caddy.exe - \httpd.exe - \nginx.exe - \php-cgi.exe - \w3wp.exe - \ws_tomcatservice.exe selection_webserver_characteristics_tomcat1: ParentImage|endswith: - \java.exe - \javaw.exe ParentImage|contains: - -tomcat- - \tomcat selection_webserver_characteristics_tomcat2: ParentImage|endswith: - \java.exe - \javaw.exe CommandLine|contains: - catalina.jar - CATALINA_HOME selection_child_1: CommandLine|contains|all: - rundll32 - comsvcs selection_child_2: CommandLine|contains|all: - ' -hp' - ' a ' - ' -m' selection_child_3: CommandLine|contains|all: - net - ' user ' - ' /add' selection_child_4: CommandLine|contains|all: - net - ' localgroup ' - ' administrators ' - /add selection_child_5: Image|endswith: - \ntdsutil.exe - \ldifde.exe - \adfind.exe - \procdump.exe - \Nanodump.exe - \vssadmin.exe - \fsutil.exe selection_child_6: CommandLine|contains: - ' -decode ' - ' -NoP ' - ' -W Hidden ' - ' /decode ' - ' /ticket:' - ' sekurlsa' - .dmp full - .downloadfile( - .downloadstring( - FromBase64String - process call create - 'reg save ' - whoami /priv condition: 1 of selection_webserver_* and 1 of selection_child_* falsepositives: - Unlikely level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects Obfuscated use of Clip.exe to execute PowerShell. Logsource: windows / ps_script. Rule: title: Invoke-Obfuscation CLIP+ Launcher - PowerShell id: 73e67340-0d25-11eb-adc1-0242ac120002 status: test description: Detects Obfuscated use of Clip.exe to execute PowerShell references: - https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/issues/1009 author: Jonathan Cheong, oscd.community date: 2020-10-13 modified: 2024-04-05 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1027 - attack.execution - attack.t1059.001 logsource: product: windows category: ps_script definition: 'Requirements: Script Block Logging must be enabled' detection: selection_4104: ScriptBlockText|re: cmd.{0,5}(?:/c|/r).+clip(?:\.exe)?.{0,4}&&.+clipboard]::\(\s\\"\{\d\}.+-f.+" condition: selection_4104 falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: actor TTPs: Exfiltration Over Webhook
Matching passage: T1567.004 Exfiltration Over Webhook. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a webhook endpoint rather than over their primary command and control channel. Webhooks are simple mechanisms for allowing a server to push data over HTTP/S to a client without the need for the client to continuously poll the server.(Citation: RedHat Webhooks) Many public and commercial services, such as Discord, Slack, and `webhook.site`, support the creation of webhook endpoints that can be used by other services, such as Github, Jira, or Trello.(Citation: Discord Intro to Webhooks) When changes happen in the linked services (such as pushing a repository update or modifying a ticket), these services will automatically post the data to the webhook endpoint for use by the consuming application. Adversaries may link an adversary-owned environment to a victim-owned SaaS service to achieve repeated [Automated Exfiltration](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1020) of emails, chat messages, and other data.(Citation: Push Security SaaS Attacks Repository Webhooks) Alternatively, instead of linking the webhook endpoint to a service, an adversary can manually post staged data directly to the URL in order to exfiltrate it.(Citation: Microsoft SQL Server) Access to webhook endpoints is often over HTTPS, which gives the adversary an additional level of protection. Exfiltration leveraging webhooks can also blend in with normal network traffic if the webhook endpoint points to a commonly used SaaS application or collaboration service.(Citation: CyberArk Labs Discord)(Citation: Talos Discord Webhook Abuse)(Citation: Checkmarx Webhooks)
Near-miss passage: T1567.001 Exfiltration to Code Repository. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a code repository rather than over their primary command and control channel. Code repositories are often accessible via an API (ex: https://api.github.com). Access to these APIs are often over HTTPS, which gives the adversary an additional level of protection. Exfiltration to a code repository can also provide a significant amount of cover to the adversary if it is a popular service already used by hosts within the network.
Query: explain CWE-913
Matching passage: CWE-913 Improper Control of Dynamically-Managed Code Resources. The product does not properly restrict reading from or writing to dynamically-managed code resources such as variables, objects, classes, attributes, functions, or executable instructions or statements.
Near-miss passage: CWE-409 Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification). The product does not handle or incorrectly handles a compressed input with a very high compression ratio that produces a large output.
Query: CWE for Storage of Sensitive Data in a Mechanism without Access Control
Matching passage: CWE-921 Storage of Sensitive Data in a Mechanism without Access Control. The product stores sensitive information in a file system or device that does not have built-in access control.
Near-miss passage: CWE-412 Unrestricted Externally Accessible Lock. The product properly checks for the existence of a lock, but the lock can be externally controlled or influenced by an actor that is outside of the intended sphere of control.
Query: indicators of Financial Theft
Matching passage: T1657 Financial Theft. Tactics: impact. Description: Adversaries may steal monetary resources from targets through extortion, social engineering, technical theft, or other methods aimed at their own financial gain at the expense of the availability of these resources for victims. Financial theft is the ultimate objective of several popular campaign types including extortion by ransomware,(Citation: FBI-ransomware) business email compromise (BEC) and fraud,(Citation: FBI-BEC) "pig butchering,"(Citation: wired-pig butchering) bank hacking,(Citation: DOJ-DPRK Heist) and exploiting cryptocurrency networks.(Citation: BBC-Ronin) Adversaries may [Compromise Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1586) to conduct unauthorized transfers of funds.(Citation: Internet crime report 2022) In the case of business email compromise or email fraud, an adversary may utilize [Impersonation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1684/001) of a trusted entity. Once the social engineering is successful, victims can be deceived into sending money to financial accounts controlled by an adversary.(Citation: FBI-BEC) This creates the potential for multiple victims (i.e., compromised accounts as well as the ultimate monetary loss) in incidents involving financial theft.(Citation: VEC) Extortion by ransomware may occur, for example, when an adversary demands payment from a victim after [Data Encrypted for Impact](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1486) (Citation: NYT-Colonial) and [Exfiltration](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0010) of data, followed by threatening to leak sensitive data to the public unless payment is made to the adversary.(Citation: Mandiant-leaks) Adversaries may use dedicated leak sites to distribute victim data.(Citation: Crowdstrike-leaks) Due to the potentially immense business impact of financial theft, an adversary may abuse the possibility of financial theft and seeking monetary gain to divert attention from their true goals such as [Data Destruction](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1485) and business
Near-miss passage: T1496.002 Bandwidth Hijacking. Tactics: impact. Description: Adversaries may leverage the network bandwidth resources of co-opted systems to complete resource-intensive tasks, which may impact system and/or hosted service availability. Adversaries may also use malware that leverages a system's network bandwidth as part of a botnet in order to facilitate [Network Denial of Service](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1498) campaigns and/or to seed malicious torrents.(Citation: GoBotKR) Alternatively, they may engage in proxyjacking by selling use of the victims' network bandwidth and IP address to proxyware services.(Citation: Sysdig Proxyjacking) Finally, they may engage in internet-wide scanning in order to identify additional targets for compromise.(Citation: Unit 42 Leaked Environment Variables 2024) In addition to incurring potential financial costs or availability disruptions, this technique may cause reputational damage if a victim’s bandwidth is used for illegal activities.(Citation: Sysdig Proxyjacking)
Query: detection rule: All TCP traffic on particular port from attacker is routed to different port. ex. '/sbin/iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -
Matching passage: Sigma rule: All TCP traffic on particular port from attacker is routed to different port. ex. '/sbin/iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -. Logsource: linux / auditd. Rule: title: Bpfdoor TCP Ports Redirect id: 70b4156e-50fc-4523-aa50-c9dddf1993fc status: test description: 'All TCP traffic on particular port from attacker is routed to different port. ex. ''/sbin/iptables -t nat -D PREROUTING -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1 --dport 22 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 42392'' The traffic looks like encrypted SSH communications going to TCP port 22, but in reality is being directed to the shell port once it hits the iptables rule for the attacker host only. ' references: - https://www.sandflysecurity.com/blog/bpfdoor-an-evasive-linux-backdoor-technical-analysis/ - https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/a-peek-behind-the-bpfdoor author: Rafal Piasecki date: 2022-08-10 tags: - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1686 logsource: product: linux service: auditd detection: cmd: type: EXECVE a0|endswith: iptables a1: -t a2: nat keywords: - --to-ports 42 - --to-ports 43 condition: cmd and keywords falsepositives: - Legitimate ports redirect level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential DLL files being downloaded using the PowerShell Invoke-WebRequest or Invoke-RestMethod cmdlets.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential DLL File Download Via PowerShell Invoke-WebRequest id: 0f0450f3-8b47-441e-a31b-15a91dc243e2 status: test description: Detects potential DLL files being downloaded using the PowerShell Invoke-WebRequest or Invoke-RestMethod cmdlets. references: - https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/security-research/onenote-growing-threat-malware-distribution author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems), Hieu Tran date: 2023-03-13 modified: 2025-07-18 tags: - attack.command-and-control - attack.execution - attack.t1059.001 - attack.t1105 logsource: product: windows category: process_creation detection: selection: CommandLine|contains: - 'Invoke-RestMethod ' - 'Invoke-WebRequest ' - 'IRM ' - 'IWR ' CommandLine|contains|all: - http - OutFile - .dll condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Query: describe CVE-2015-8876
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8876. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Zend/zend_exceptions.c in PHP before 5.4.44, 5.5.x before 5.5.28, and 5.6.x before 5.6.12 does not validate certain Exception objects, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) or trigger unintended method execution via crafted serialized data.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4840. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.0. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u85 and 8u60, and Java SE Embedded 8u51, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to 2D.
Query: exploit Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Smiley plugin 1.4.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of editors for requests that conduc
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4140. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Smiley plugin 1.4.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of editors for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the s4w-more parameter to the smilies4wp.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8379. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. CakePHP 2.x and 3.x before 3.1.5 might allow remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via the _method parameter.
Query: secure coding against Exposure of Sensitive Information during Transient Execution
Matching passage: CWE-1420 Exposure of Sensitive Information during Transient Execution. A processor event or prediction may allow incorrect operations (or correct operations with incorrect data) to execute transiently, potentially exposing data over a covert channel.
Near-miss passage: CWE-263 Password Aging with Long Expiration. The product supports password aging, but the expiration period is too long.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-7213
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7213. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Integer overflow in the MPEG4Extractor::readMetaData function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in Mozilla Firefox before 43.0 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.5 on 64-bit platforms allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted MP4 video file that triggers a buffer overflow.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4472. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Off-by-one error in the READ_ENCINT macro in chmd.c in libmspack before 0.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted CHM file.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-10113
Matching passage: CVE-2015-10113. CWE: CWE-601. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in WooFramework Tweaks Plugin up to 1.0.1 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is the function admin_screen_logic of the file wooframework-tweaks.php. The manipulation of the argument url leads to open redirect. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 1.0.2 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 3b57d405149c1a59d1119da6e0bb8212732c9c88. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-230653 was assigned to this vulnerability.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-10052. CWE: CWE-601. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in calesanz gibb-modul-151. This affects the function bearbeiten/login. The manipulation leads to open redirect. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The patch is named 88a517dc19443081210c804b655e72770727540d. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-218379. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Query: SIEM correlation: resource development activity consistent with DNS Server
Matching passage: T1584.002 DNS Server. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise third-party DNS servers that can be used during targeting. During post-compromise activity, adversaries may utilize DNS traffic for various tasks, including for Command and Control (ex: [Application Layer Protocol](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1071)). Instead of setting up their own DNS servers, adversaries may compromise third-party DNS servers in support of operations. By compromising DNS servers, adversaries can alter DNS records. Such control can allow for redirection of an organization's traffic, facilitating Collection and Credential Access efforts for the adversary.(Citation: Talos DNSpionage Nov 2018)(Citation: FireEye DNS Hijack 2019) Additionally, adversaries may leverage such control in conjunction with [Digital Certificates](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588/004) to redirect traffic to adversary-controlled infrastructure, mimicking normal trusted network communications.(Citation: FireEye DNS Hijack 2019)(Citation: Crowdstrike DNS Hijack 2019) Alternatively, they may be able to prove ownership of a domain to a SaaS service in order to assert control of the service or create a new administrative [Cloud Account](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1136/003).(Citation: CyberCX SaaS Domain Hijacking 2025) Adversaries may also be able to silently create subdomains pointed at malicious servers without tipping off the actual owner of the DNS server.(Citation: CiscoAngler)(Citation: Proofpoint Domain Shadowing)
Near-miss passage: T1584.001 Domains. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may hijack domains and/or subdomains that can be used during targeting. Domain registration hijacking is the act of changing the registration of a domain name without the permission of the original registrant.(Citation: ICANNDomainNameHijacking) Adversaries may gain access to an email account for the person listed as the owner of the domain. The adversary can then claim that they forgot their password in order to make changes to the domain registration. Other possibilities include social engineering a domain registration help desk to gain access to an account, taking advantage of renewal process gaps, or compromising a cloud service that enables managing domains (e.g., AWS Route53).(Citation: Krebs DNS Hijack 2019) Subdomain hijacking can occur when organizations have DNS entries that point to non-existent or deprovisioned resources. In such cases, an adversary may take control of a subdomain to conduct operations with the benefit of the trust associated with that domain.(Citation: Microsoft Sub Takeover 2020) Adversaries who compromise a domain may also engage in domain shadowing by creating malicious subdomains under their control while keeping any existing DNS records. As service will not be disrupted, the malicious subdomains may go unnoticed for long periods of time.(Citation: Palo Alto Unit 42 Domain Shadowing 2022)
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-1142
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1142. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. LaunchServices in Apple OS X before 10.10.3 allows local users to cause a denial of service (Finder crash) via crafted localization data.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6279. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. The IPv6 snooping functionality in the first-hop security subsystem in Cisco IOS 12.2, 15.0, 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4, and 15.5 and IOS XE 3.2SE, 3.3SE, 3.3XO, 3.4SG, 3.5E, and 3.6E before 3.6.3E; 3.7E before 3.7.2E; 3.9S and 3.10S before 3.10.6S; 3.11S before 3.11.4S; 3.12S and 3.13S before 3.13.3S; and 3.14S before 3.14.2S allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a malformed ND packet with the Cryptographically Generated Address (CGA) option, aka Bug ID CSCuo04400.
Query: describe CVE-2015-3224
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3224. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. request.rb in Web Console before 2.1.3, as used with Ruby on Rails 3.x and 4.x, does not properly restrict the use of X-Forwarded-For headers in determining a client's IP address, which allows remote attackers to bypass the whitelisted_ips protection mechanism via a crafted request.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7494. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 2.799999952316284. A vulnerability has been identified in IBM Cloud Orchestrator services/[action]/launch API. An authenticated domain admin user might modify cross domain resources via a /services/[action]/launch API call, provided it would have been possible for the domain admin user to gain access to a resource identifier of the other domain.