alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: telemetry for T1593.002
Matching passage: T1593.002 Search Engines. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may use search engines to collect information about victims that can be used during targeting. Search engine services typical crawl online sites to index context and may provide users with specialized syntax to search for specific keywords or specific types of content (i.e. filetypes).(Citation: SecurityTrails Google Hacking)(Citation: ExploitDB GoogleHacking) Adversaries may craft various search engine queries depending on what information they seek to gather. Threat actors may use search engines to harvest general information about victims, as well as use specialized queries to look for spillages/leaks of sensitive information such as network details or credentials. Information from these sources may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598) or [Search Open Technical Databases](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1596)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Establish Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1585) or [Compromise Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1586)), and/or initial access (ex: [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078) or [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566)).
Near-miss passage: T1593 Search Open Websites/Domains. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may search freely available websites and/or domains for information about victims that can be used during targeting. Information about victims may be available in various online sites, such as social media, new sites, or those hosting information about business operations such as hiring or requested/rewarded contracts.(Citation: Cyware Social Media)(Citation: SecurityTrails Google Hacking)(Citation: ExploitDB GoogleHacking) Adversaries may search in different online sites depending on what information they seek to gather. Information from these sources may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598) or [Search Open Technical Databases](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1596)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Establish Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1585) or [Compromise Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1586)), and/or initial access (ex: [External Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1133) or [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566)).
Query: alert when Detects certificate creation with template allowing risk permission subject and risky EKU
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects certificate creation with template allowing risk permission subject and risky EKU. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: ADCS Certificate Template Configuration Vulnerability with Risky EKU id: bfbd3291-de87-4b7c-88a2-d6a5deb28668 status: test description: Detects certificate creation with template allowing risk permission subject and risky EKU references: - https://www.specterops.io/assets/resources/Certified_Pre-Owned.pdf author: Orlinum , BlueDefenZer date: 2021-11-17 modified: 2022-12-25 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.credential-access logsource: product: windows service: security definition: Certificate services loaded a template would trigger event ID 4898 and certificate Services template was updated would trigger event ID 4899. A risk permission seems to be coming if template contain specific flag with risky EKU. detection: selection10: EventID: 4898 TemplateContent|contains: - 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 - 1.3.6.1.5.2.3.4 - 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 - 2.5.29.37.0 selection11: TemplateContent|contains: CT_FLAG_ENROLLEE_SUPPLIES_SUBJECT selection20: EventID: 4899 NewTemplateContent|contains: - 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2 - 1.3.6.1.5.2.3.4 - 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.2 - 2.5.29.37.0 selection21: NewTemplateContent|contains: CT_FLAG_ENROLLEE_SUPPLIES_SUBJECT condition: (selection10 and selection11) or (selection20 and selection21) falsepositives: - Administrator activity - Proxy SSL certificate with subject modification - Smart card enrollement level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects a suspicious LSASS process process clone that could be a sign of credential dumping activity. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Credential Dumping Via LSASS Process Clone id: c8da0dfd-4ed0-4b68-962d-13c9c884384e status: test description: Detects a suspicious LSASS process process clone that could be a sign of credential dumping activity references: - https://www.matteomalvica.com/blog/2019/12/02/win-defender-atp-cred-bypass/ - https://twitter.com/Hexacorn/status/1420053502554951689 - https://twitter.com/SBousseaden/status/1464566846594691073?s=20 author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems), Samir Bousseaden date: 2021-11-27 modified: 2023-03-02 tags: - attack.credential-access - attack.t1003 - attack.t1003.001 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: ParentImage|endswith: \Windows\System32\lsass.exe Image|endswith: \Windows\System32\lsass.exe condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: critical
Query: risk of The Extended Application Services (XS) in SAP HANA allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary ABAP code via unspecified vectors, aka SAP Note 2098906. NOTE: the provenance of this
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1311. CWE: CWE-94. CVSS: 10.0. The Extended Application Services (XS) in SAP HANA allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary ABAP code via unspecified vectors, aka SAP Note 2098906. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1645. CWE: CWE-94. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 SP1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Enhanced Metafile (EMF) image, aka "EMF Processing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
Query: exploit Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.232 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.508 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.199, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5551. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.232 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.508 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.199, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.199, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 18.0.0.199 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5127, CVE-2015-5130, CVE-2015-5134, CVE-2015-5539, CVE-2015-5540, CVE-2015-5550, CVE-2015-5556, CVE-2015-5557, CVE-2015-5559, CVE-2015-5561, CVE-2015-5563, CVE-2015-5564, and CVE-2015-5565.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0405. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.0. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.22 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to XA.
Query: risk of Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60; Java SE Embedded 8u51; and JRockit R28.3.7 allows remote attackers to affect availability via vectors related to 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4803. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.0. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60; Java SE Embedded 8u51; and JRockit R28.3.7 allows remote attackers to affect availability via vectors related to JAXP, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4893 and CVE-2015-4911.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7658. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.261 and 19.x before 19.0.0.245 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.548 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 19.0.0.241, Adobe AIR SDK before 19.0.0.241, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 19.0.0.241 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted actionInstanceOf arguments, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7651, CVE-2015-7652, CVE-2015-7653, CVE-2015-7654, CVE-2015-7655, CVE-2015-7656, CVE-2015-7657, CVE-2015-7660, CVE-2015-7661, CVE-2015-7663, CVE-2015-8042, CVE-2015-8043, CVE-2015-8044, and CVE-2015-8046.
Query: describe CVE-2015-6775
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6775. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. fpdfsdk/src/jsapi/fxjs_v8.cpp in PDFium, as used in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73, does not use signatures, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via vectors that leverage "type confusion."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2473. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Untrusted search path vulnerability in the client in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) through 8.1 in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1 and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in the current working directory, as demonstrated by a directory that contains a .rdp file, aka "Remote Desktop Protocol DLL Planting Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
Query: describe CVE-2015-6243
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6243. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The dissector-table implementation in epan/packet.c in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.7 mishandles table searches for empty strings, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted packet, related to the (1) dissector_get_string_handle and (2) dissector_get_default_string_handle functions.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0760. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 4.0. The IKEv1 implementation in Cisco ASA Software 7.x, 8.0.x, 8.1.x, and 8.2.x before 8.2.2.13 allows remote authenticated users to bypass XAUTH authentication via crafted IKEv1 packets, aka Bug ID CSCus47259.
Query: Suspicious Time Providers execution detected on endpoint
Matching passage: T1547.003 Time Providers. Tactics: persistence, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may abuse time providers to execute DLLs when the system boots. The Windows Time service (W32Time) enables time synchronization across and within domains.(Citation: Microsoft W32Time Feb 2018) W32Time time providers are responsible for retrieving time stamps from hardware/network resources and outputting these values to other network clients.(Citation: Microsoft TimeProvider) Time providers are implemented as dynamic-link libraries (DLLs) that are registered in the subkeys of `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\TimeProviders\`.(Citation: Microsoft TimeProvider) The time provider manager, directed by the service control manager, loads and starts time providers listed and enabled under this key at system startup and/or whenever parameters are changed.(Citation: Microsoft TimeProvider) Adversaries may abuse this architecture to establish persistence, specifically by creating a new arbitrarily named subkey pointing to a malicious DLL in the `DllName` value. Administrator privileges are required for time provider registration, though execution will run in context of the Local Service account.(Citation: Github W32Time Oct 2017)
Near-miss passage: T1547.002 Authentication Package. Tactics: persistence, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may abuse authentication packages to execute DLLs when the system boots. Windows authentication package DLLs are loaded by the Local Security Authority (LSA) process at system start. They provide support for multiple logon processes and multiple security protocols to the operating system.(Citation: MSDN Authentication Packages) Adversaries can use the autostart mechanism provided by LSA authentication packages for persistence by placing a reference to a binary in the Windows Registry location <code>HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\</code> with the key value of <code>"Authentication Packages"=&lt;target binary&gt;</code>. The binary will then be executed by the system when the authentication packages are loaded.
Query: credential access using Silver Ticket
Matching passage: T1558.002 Silver Ticket. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries who have the password hash of a target service account (e.g. SharePoint, MSSQL) may forge Kerberos ticket granting service (TGS) tickets, also known as silver tickets. Kerberos TGS tickets are also known as service tickets.(Citation: ADSecurity Silver Tickets) Silver tickets are more limited in scope in than golden tickets in that they only enable adversaries to access a particular resource (e.g. MSSQL) and the system that hosts the resource; however, unlike golden tickets, adversaries with the ability to forge silver tickets are able to create TGS tickets without interacting with the Key Distribution Center (KDC), potentially making detection more difficult.(Citation: ADSecurity Detecting Forged Tickets) Password hashes for target services may be obtained using [OS Credential Dumping](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1003) or [Kerberoasting](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1558/003).
Near-miss passage: T1558.003 Kerberoasting. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries may abuse a valid Kerberos ticket-granting ticket (TGT) or sniff network traffic to obtain a ticket-granting service (TGS) ticket that may be vulnerable to [Brute Force](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110).(Citation: Empire InvokeKerberoast Oct 2016)(Citation: AdSecurity Cracking Kerberos Dec 2015) Service principal names (SPNs) are used to uniquely identify each instance of a Windows service. To enable authentication, Kerberos requires that SPNs be associated with at least one service logon account (an account specifically tasked with running a service(Citation: Microsoft Detecting Kerberoasting Feb 2018)).(Citation: Microsoft SPN)(Citation: Microsoft SetSPN)(Citation: SANS Attacking Kerberos Nov 2014)(Citation: Harmj0y Kerberoast Nov 2016) Adversaries possessing a valid Kerberos ticket-granting ticket (TGT) may request one or more Kerberos ticket-granting service (TGS) service tickets for any SPN from a domain controller (DC).(Citation: Empire InvokeKerberoast Oct 2016)(Citation: AdSecurity Cracking Kerberos Dec 2015) Portions of these tickets may be encrypted with the RC4 algorithm, meaning the Kerberos 5 TGS-REP etype 23 hash of the service account associated with the SPN is used as the private key and is thus vulnerable to offline [Brute Force](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110) attacks that may expose plaintext credentials.(Citation: AdSecurity Cracking Kerberos Dec 2015)(Citation: Empire InvokeKerberoast Oct 2016) (Citation: Harmj0y Kerberoast Nov 2016) This same behavior could be executed using service tickets captured from network traffic.(Citation: AdSecurity Cracking Kerberos Dec 2015) Cracked hashes may enable [Persistence](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003), [Privilege Escalation](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0004), and [Lateral Movement](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0008) via access to [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078).(Citation: SANS Attacking Kerberos Nov 2014)
Query: secure coding against Improper Neutralization of Internal Special Elements
Matching passage: CWE-164 Improper Neutralization of Internal Special Elements. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes internal special elements that could be interpreted in unexpected ways when they are sent to a downstream component.
Near-miss passage: CWE-1394 Use of Default Cryptographic Key. The product uses a default cryptographic key for potentially critical functionality.
Query: risk of HP Support Solution Framework before 11.51.0049 allows remote attackers to download an arbitrary program onto a client machine and execute this program via unspecified vectors.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2114. CWE: CWE-254. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. HP Support Solution Framework before 11.51.0049 allows remote attackers to download an arbitrary program onto a client machine and execute this program via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7914. CWE: CWE-254. CVSS: 8.100000381469727. Sauter EY-WS505F0x0 moduWeb Vision before 1.6.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging knowledge of a password hash without knowledge of the associated password.
Query: describe CVE-2015-0004
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0004. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. The User Profile Service (aka ProfSvc) in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows local users to gain privileges by conducting a junction attack to load another user's UsrClass.dat registry hive, aka MSRC ID 20674 or "Microsoft User Profile Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1702. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 6.900000095367432. The Service Control Manager (SCM) in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 does not properly constrain impersonation levels, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Service Control Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-1733
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1733. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Microsoft Internet Explorer 10 and 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2389 and CVE-2015-2411.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7021. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. The Graphics Drivers subsystem in Apple OS X before 10.11.1 allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (kernel memory corruption) via unspecified vectors.
Query: write Sigma for Adversaries may shutdown/reboot systems to interrupt access to, or aid in the destruction of, those systems.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Adversaries may shutdown/reboot systems to interrupt access to, or aid in the destruction of, those systems.. Logsource: linux / auditd. Rule: title: System Shutdown/Reboot - Linux id: 4cb57c2f-1f29-41f8-893d-8bed8e1c1d2f status: test description: Adversaries may shutdown/reboot systems to interrupt access to, or aid in the destruction of, those systems. references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1529/T1529.md author: Igor Fits, oscd.community date: 2020-10-15 modified: 2022-11-26 tags: - attack.impact - attack.t1529 logsource: product: linux service: auditd detection: execve: type: EXECVE shutdowncmd: - shutdown - reboot - halt - poweroff init: - init - telinit initselection: - 0 - 6 condition: execve and (shutdowncmd or (init and initselection)) falsepositives: - Legitimate administrative activity level: informational
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects suspicious PowerShell scripts accessing SAM hives. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: PowerShell SAM Copy id: 1af57a4b-460a-4738-9034-db68b880c665 status: test description: Detects suspicious PowerShell scripts accessing SAM hives references: - https://twitter.com/splinter_code/status/1420546784250769408 author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-07-29 modified: 2023-01-06 tags: - attack.credential-access - attack.t1003.002 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_1: CommandLine|contains|all: - \HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy - System32\config\sam selection_2: CommandLine|contains: - Copy-Item - cp $_. - cpi $_. - copy $_. - .File]::Copy( condition: all of selection* falsepositives: - Some rare backup scenarios - PowerShell scripts fixing HiveNightmare / SeriousSAM ACLs level: high
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-8158
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8158. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.900000095367432. The getresponse function in ntpq in NTP versions before 4.2.8p9 and 4.3.x before 4.3.90 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via crafted packets with incorrect values.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0512. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.800000190734863. Open redirect vulnerability in EMC Unisphere Central before 4.0 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via an unspecified parameter.
Query: SOC alert related to Password Managers
Matching passage: T1555.005 Password Managers. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries may acquire user credentials from third-party password managers.(Citation: ise Password Manager February 2019) Password managers are applications designed to store user credentials, normally in an encrypted database. Credentials are typically accessible after a user provides a master password that unlocks the database. After the database is unlocked, these credentials may be copied to memory. These databases can be stored as files on disk.(Citation: ise Password Manager February 2019) Adversaries may acquire user credentials from password managers by extracting the master password and/or plain-text credentials from memory.(Citation: FoxIT Wocao December 2019)(Citation: Github KeeThief) Adversaries may extract credentials from memory via [Exploitation for Credential Access](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1212).(Citation: NVD CVE-2019-3610) Adversaries may also try brute forcing via [Password Guessing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110/001) to obtain the master password of a password manager.(Citation: Cyberreason Anchor December 2019)
Near-miss passage: T1555.006 Cloud Secrets Management Stores. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries may acquire credentials from cloud-native secret management solutions such as AWS Secrets Manager, GCP Secret Manager, Azure Key Vault, and Terraform Vault. Secrets managers support the secure centralized management of passwords, API keys, and other credential material. Where secrets managers are in use, cloud services can dynamically acquire credentials via API requests rather than accessing secrets insecurely stored in plain text files or environment variables. If an adversary is able to gain sufficient privileges in a cloud environment – for example, by obtaining the credentials of high-privileged [Cloud Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078/004) or compromising a service that has permission to retrieve secrets – they may be able to request secrets from the secrets manager. This can be accomplished via commands such as `get-secret-value` in AWS, `gcloud secrets describe` in GCP, and `az key vault secret show` in Azure.(Citation: Permiso Scattered Spider 2023)(Citation: Sysdig ScarletEel 2.0 2023)(Citation: AWS Secrets Manager)(Citation: Google Cloud Secrets)(Citation: Microsoft Azure Key Vault) **Note:** this technique is distinct from [Cloud Instance Metadata API](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552/005) in that the credentials are being directly requested from the cloud secrets manager, rather than through the medium of the instance metadata API.