alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-10032
Matching passage: CVE-2015-10032. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. A vulnerability was found in HealthMateWeb. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file createaccount.php. The manipulation of the argument username/password/first_name/last_name/company/phone leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The patch is named 472776c25b1046ecaf962c46fed7c713c72c28e3. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217663.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7383. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Reference Database (aka refbase) through 0.9.6 and bleeding-edge through 2015-04-28 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) adminUserName, (2) pathToMYSQL, (3) databaseStructureFile, or (4) pathToBibutils parameter to install.php or the (5) adminUserName parameter to update.php.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0338
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0338. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Integer overflow in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.277 and 14.x through 17.x before 17.0.0.134 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.451 on Linux allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6791. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.80 allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have other impact via unknown vectors.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-2094
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2094. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.5. Stack-based buffer overflow in the WESPPlayback.WESPPlaybackCtrl.1 control in WebGate WinRDS allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors to the (1) PrintSiteImage, (2) PlaySiteAllChannel, (3) StopSiteAllChannel, or (4) SaveSiteImage function.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5343. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.599999904632568. Integer overflow in util.c in mod_dav_svn in Apache Subversion 1.7.x, 1.8.x before 1.8.15, and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (subversion server crash or memory consumption) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a skel-encoded request body, which triggers an out-of-bounds read and heap-based buffer overflow.
Query: risk of Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Central software 1.3(0.1) allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCux
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6388. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.0. Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Central software 1.3(0.1) allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCux33575.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5359. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.099999904632568. Juniper Junos OS 12.1X44 before 12.1X44-D50, 12.1X46 before 12.1X46-D35, 12.1X47 before 12.1X47-D25, 12.3 before 12.3R9, 12.3X48 before 12.3X48-D10, 13.2 before 13.2R7, 13.3 before 13.3R5, 14.1R3 before 14.1R3-S2, 14.1 before 14.1R4, 14.2 before 14.2R2, and 15.1 before 15.1R1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and RDP crash) via a large number of BGP-VPLS advertisements with updated BGP local preference values.
Query: Persistence mechanism resembling Right-to-Left Override
Matching passage: T1036.002 Right-to-Left Override. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may abuse the right-to-left override (RTLO or RLO) character (U+202E) to disguise a string and/or file name to make it appear benign. RTLO is a non-printing Unicode character that causes the text that follows it to be displayed in reverse. For example, a Windows screensaver executable named <code>March 25 \u202Excod.scr</code> will display as <code>March 25 rcs.docx</code>. A JavaScript file named <code>photo_high_re\u202Egnp.js</code> will be displayed as <code>photo_high_resj.png</code>.(Citation: Infosecinstitute RTLO Technique) Adversaries may abuse the RTLO character as a means of tricking a user into executing what they think is a benign file type. A common use of this technique is with [Spearphishing Attachment](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566/001)/[Malicious File](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1204/002) since it can trick both end users and defenders if they are not aware of how their tools display and render the RTLO character. Use of the RTLO character has been seen in many targeted intrusion attempts and criminal activity.(Citation: Trend Micro PLEAD RTLO)(Citation: Kaspersky RTLO Cyber Crime) RTLO can be used in the Windows Registry as well, where regedit.exe displays the reversed characters but the command line tool reg.exe does not by default.
Near-miss passage: T1036.003 Rename Legitimate Utilities. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may rename legitimate / system utilities to try to evade security mechanisms concerning the usage of those utilities. Security monitoring and control mechanisms may be in place for legitimate utilities adversaries are capable of abusing, including both built-in binaries and tools such as PSExec, AutoHotKey, and IronPython.(Citation: LOLBAS Main Site)(Citation: Huntress Python Malware 2025)(Citation: The DFIR Report AutoHotKey 2023)(Citation: Splunk Detect Renamed PSExec) It may be possible to bypass those security mechanisms by renaming the utility prior to utilization (ex: rename <code>rundll32.exe</code>).(Citation: Elastic Masquerade Ball) An alternative case occurs when a legitimate utility is copied or moved to a different directory and renamed to avoid detections based on these utilities executing from non-standard paths.(Citation: F-Secure CozyDuke)
Query: write Sigma for Detects suspicious Spring framework exceptions that could indicate exploitation attempts
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects suspicious Spring framework exceptions that could indicate exploitation attempts. Logsource: spring / application. Rule: title: Spring Framework Exceptions id: ae48ab93-45f7-4051-9dfe-5d30a3f78e33 status: stable description: Detects suspicious Spring framework exceptions that could indicate exploitation attempts references: - https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/current/api/overview-tree.html author: Thomas Patzke date: 2017-08-06 modified: 2020-09-01 tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1190 logsource: category: application product: spring detection: keywords: - AccessDeniedException - CsrfException - InvalidCsrfTokenException - MissingCsrfTokenException - CookieTheftException - InvalidCookieException - RequestRejectedException condition: keywords falsepositives: - Application bugs level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential abuse of the "register_app.vbs" script that is part of the Windows SDK. The script offers the capabili. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Register_App.Vbs LOLScript Abuse id: 28c8f68b-098d-45af-8d43-8089f3e35403 status: test description: Detects potential abuse of the "register_app.vbs" script that is part of the Windows SDK. The script offers the capability to register new VSS/VDS Provider as a COM+ application. Attackers can use this to install malicious DLLs for persistence and execution. references: - https://twitter.com/sblmsrsn/status/1456613494783160325?s=20 - https://github.com/microsoft/Windows-classic-samples/blob/7cbd99ac1d2b4a0beffbaba29ea63d024ceff700/Samples/Win7Samples/winbase/vss/vsssampleprovider/register_app.vbs author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-11-05 modified: 2022-07-07 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1218 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: - \cscript.exe - \wscript.exe - OriginalFileName: - cscript.exe - wscript.exe selection_cli: CommandLine|contains: '.vbs -register ' condition: all of selection* falsepositives: - Other VB scripts that leverage the same starting command line flags level: medium
Query: describe CVE-2015-7691
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7691. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.5. The crypto_xmit function in ntpd in NTP 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted packets containing particular autokey operations. NOTE: This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-9750.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7282. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.800000190734863. ReadyNet WRT300N-DD devices with firmware 1.0.26 use the same source port number for every DNS query, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof responses by selecting that number for the destination port.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-8324
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8324. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.599999904632568. The ext4 implementation in the Linux kernel before 2.6.34 does not properly track the initialization of certain data structures, which allows physically proximate attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and panic) via a crafted USB device, related to the ext4_fill_super function.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4776. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 6.900000095367432. Unspecified vulnerability in the Data Store component in Oracle Berkeley DB 11.2.5.1.29, 11.2.5.2.42, 11.2.5.3.28, and 12.1.6.0.35 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2583, CVE-2015-2624, CVE-2015-2626, CVE-2015-2640, CVE-2015-2654, CVE-2015-2656, CVE-2015-4754, CVE-2015-4764, CVE-2015-4775, CVE-2015-4777, CVE-2015-4778, CVE-2015-4780, CVE-2015-4781, CVE-2015-4782, CVE-2015-4783, CVE-2015-4784, CVE-2015-4785, CVE-2015-4786, CVE-2015-4787, CVE-2015-4789, and CVE-2015-4790.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-3147
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3147. CWE: CWE-59. CVSS: 6.5. daemon/abrt-handle-upload.in in Automatic Bug Reporting Tool (ABRT), when moving problem reports from /var/spool/abrt-upload, allows local users to write to arbitrary files or possibly have other unspecified impact via a symlink attack on (1) /var/spool/abrt or (2) /var/tmp/abrt.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1335. CWE: CWE-59. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. lxc-start in lxc before 1.0.8 and 1.1.x before 1.1.4 allows local container administrators to escape AppArmor confinement via a symlink attack on a (1) mount target or (2) bind mount source.
Query: vulnerability: IBM DataPower Gateway appliances with firmware 6.x before 6.0.0.17, 6.0.1.x before 6.0.1.17, 7.x before 7.0.0.10, 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.7, and 7.2.x before 7.2.0.1 do not set the se
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7427. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. IBM DataPower Gateway appliances with firmware 6.x before 6.0.0.17, 6.0.1.x before 6.0.1.17, 7.x before 7.0.0.10, 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.7, and 7.2.x before 7.2.0.1 do not set the secure flag for unspecified cookies in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture these cookies by intercepting their transmission within an http session.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5583. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.16 and 11.x before 11.0.13, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30094, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.009.20069 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended sandbox restrictions and obtain sensitive PDF information by launching a print job on a remote printer, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6705, CVE-2015-6706, and CVE-2015-7624.
Query: rule covering Detects the potential abuse of the Linux Magic SysRq (System Request) key by adversaries with root or sufficient privile
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the potential abuse of the Linux Magic SysRq (System Request) key by adversaries with root or sufficient privile. Logsource: linux / auditd. Rule: title: Potential Abuse of Linux Magic System Request Key id: ea61bb82-a5e0-42e6-8537-91d29500f1b9 status: experimental description: 'Detects the potential abuse of the Linux Magic SysRq (System Request) key by adversaries with root or sufficient privileges to silently manipulate or destabilize a system. By writing to /proc/sysrq-trigger, they can crash the system, kill processes, or disrupt forensic analysis—all while bypassing standard logging. Though intended for recovery and debugging, SysRq can be misused as a stealthy post-exploitation tool. It is controlled via /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq or permanently through /etc/sysctl.conf. ' references: - https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/_sources/admin-guide/sysrq.txt - https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/4/html/reference_guide/s3-proc-sys-kernel - https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/security/threat-update-awfulshred-script-wiper.html author: Milad Cheraghi date: 2025-05-23 tags: - attack.execution - attack.t1059.004 - attack.impact - attack.t1529 - attack.t1489 - attack.t1499 logsource: product: linux service: auditd definition: 'Required auditd configuration: -w /proc/sysrq-trigger -p wa -k sysrq -w /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq -p wa -k sysrq ' detection: selection: type: PATH name|endswith: - /sysrq - /sysctl.conf - /sysrq-trigger condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate administrative activity level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Indicates the SAML token issuer for the associated SAML token is potentially compromised. The claims included in the tok. Logsource: azure / riskdetection. Rule: title: SAML Token Issuer Anomaly id: e3393cba-31f0-4207-831e-aef90ab17a8c status: test description: Indicates the SAML token issuer for the associated SAML token is potentially compromised. The claims included in the token are unusual or match known attacker patterns references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/id-protection/concept-identity-protection-risks#token-issuer-anomaly - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/architecture/security-operations-user-accounts#unusual-sign-ins author: Mark Morowczynski '@markmorow', Gloria Lee, '@gleeiamglo' date: 2023-09-03 tags: - attack.t1606 - attack.credential-access logsource: product: azure service: riskdetection detection: selection: riskEventType: tokenIssuerAnomaly condition: selection falsepositives: - We recommend investigating the sessions flagged by this detection in the context of other sign-ins from the user. level: high
Query: weakness Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
Matching passage: CWE-303 Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm. The requirements for the product dictate the use of an established authentication algorithm, but the implementation of the algorithm is incorrect.
Near-miss passage: CWE-941 Incorrectly Specified Destination in a Communication Channel. The product creates a communication channel to initiate an outgoing request to an actor, but it does not correctly specify the intended destination for that actor.
Query: mitigate Shell History
Matching passage: T1552.003 Shell History. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries may search the command history on compromised systems for insecurely stored credentials. On Linux and macOS systems, shells such as Bash and Zsh keep track of the commands users type on the command-line with the "history" utility. Once a user logs out, the history is flushed to the user's history file. For each user, this file resides at the same location: for example, `~/.bash_history` or `~/.zsh_history`. Typically, these files keeps track of the user's last 1000 commands. On Windows, PowerShell has both a command history that is wiped after the session ends, and one that contains commands used in all sessions and is persistent. The default location for persistent history can be found in `%userprofile%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\PowerShell\PSReadline\ConsoleHost_history.txt`, but command history can also be accessed with `Get-History`. Command Prompt (CMD) on Windows does not have persistent history.(Citation: Microsoft about_History)(Citation: Medium) Users often type usernames and passwords on the command-line as parameters to programs, which then get saved to this file when they log out. Adversaries can abuse this by looking through the file for potential credentials.(Citation: External to DA, the OS X Way)
Near-miss passage: T1552.001 Credentials In Files. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries may search local file systems and remote file shares for files containing insecurely stored credentials. These can be files created by users to store their own credentials, shared credential stores for a group of individuals, configuration files containing passwords for a system or service, or source code/binary files containing embedded passwords. It is possible to extract passwords from backups or saved virtual machines through [OS Credential Dumping](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1003).(Citation: CG 2014) Passwords may also be obtained from Group Policy Preferences stored on the Windows Domain Controller.(Citation: SRD GPP) In cloud and/or containerized environments, authenticated user and service account credentials are often stored in local configuration and credential files.(Citation: Unit 42 Hildegard Malware) They may also be found as parameters to deployment commands in container logs.(Citation: Unit 42 Unsecured Docker Daemons) In some cases, these files can be copied and reused on another machine or the contents can be read and then used to authenticate without needing to copy any files.(Citation: Specter Ops - Cloud Credential Storage)
Query: intelligence brief on T1090
Matching passage: T1090 Proxy. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may use a connection proxy to direct network traffic between systems or act as an intermediary for network communications to a command and control server to avoid direct connections to their infrastructure. Many tools exist that enable traffic redirection through proxies or port redirection, including [HTRAN](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0040), ZXProxy, and ZXPortMap. (Citation: Trend Micro APT Attack Tools) Adversaries use these types of proxies to manage command and control communications, reduce the number of simultaneous outbound network connections, provide resiliency in the face of connection loss, or to ride over existing trusted communications paths between victims to avoid suspicion. Adversaries may chain together multiple proxies to further disguise the source of malicious traffic. Adversaries can also take advantage of routing schemes in Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) to proxy command and control traffic.
Near-miss passage: T1090.003 Multi-hop Proxy. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may chain together multiple proxies to disguise the source of malicious traffic. Typically, a defender will be able to identify the last proxy traffic traversed before it enters their network; the defender may or may not be able to identify any previous proxies before the last-hop proxy. This technique makes identifying the original source of the malicious traffic even more difficult by requiring the defender to trace malicious traffic through several proxies to identify its source. For example, adversaries may construct or use onion routing networks – such as the publicly available [Tor](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0183) network – to transport encrypted C2 traffic through a compromised population, allowing communication with any device within the network.(Citation: Onion Routing) Adversaries may also use operational relay box (ORB) networks composed of virtual private servers (VPS), Internet of Things (IoT) devices, smart devices, and end-of-life routers to obfuscate their operations.(Citation: ORB Mandiant) In the case of network infrastructure, it is possible for an adversary to leverage multiple compromised devices to create a multi-hop proxy chain (i.e., [Network Devices](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584/008)). By leveraging [Patch System Image](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1601/001) on routers, adversaries can add custom code to the affected network devices that will implement onion routing between those nodes. This method is dependent upon the [Network Boundary Bridging](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1599) method allowing the adversaries to cross the protected network boundary of the Internet perimeter and into the organization’s Wide-Area Network (WAN). Protocols such as ICMP may be used as a transport. Similarly, adversaries may abuse peer-to-peer (P2P) and blockchain-oriented infrastructure to implement routing between a decentralized network of peers.(Citation: NGLite Trojan)
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-5095
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5095. CWE: CWE-416. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.008.20082 on Windows and OS X allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4448, CVE-2015-5099, CVE-2015-5101, CVE-2015-5111, CVE-2015-5113, and CVE-2015-5114.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8821. CWE: CWE-416. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted MPEG-4 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, CVE-2015-8454, CVE-2015-8653, CVE-2015-8655, and CVE-2015-8822.
Query: risk of libuser before 0.56.13-8 and 0.60 before 0.60-7, as used in the userhelper program in the usermode package, directly modifies /etc/passwd, which allows local users to cause a denia
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3246. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. libuser before 0.56.13-8 and 0.60 before 0.60-7, as used in the userhelper program in the usermode package, directly modifies /etc/passwd, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (inconsistent file state) by causing an error during the modification. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2015-3245 to gain privileges.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7751. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 6.900000095367432. Juniper Junos OS before 12.1X44-D50, 12.1X46 before 12.1X46-D35, 12.1X47 before 12.1X47-D25, 12.3 before 12.3R9, 12.3X48 before 12.3X48-D15, 13.2 before 13.2R7, 13.2X51 before 13.2X51-D35, 13.3 before 13.3R6, 14.1 before 14.1R5, 14.1X50 before 14.1X50-D105, 14.1X51 before 14.1X51-D70, 14.1X53 before 14.1X53-D25, 14.1X55 before 14.1X55-D20, 14.2 before 14.2R1, 15.1 before 15.1F2 or 15.1R1, and 15.1X49 before 15.1X49-D10 does not require a password for the root user when pam.conf is "corrupted," which allows local users to gain root privileges by modifying the file.