alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-1903
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1903. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM Domino 8.5 before 8.5.3 FP6 IF7 and 9.0 before 9.0.1 FP3 IF3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted BMP image, aka SPR KLYH9TSN3Y.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5259. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 8.600000381469727. Integer overflow in the read_string function in libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c in Apache Subversion 1.9.x before 1.9.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an svn:// protocol string, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow and an out-of-bounds read.
Query: SOC alert related to Permission Groups Discovery
Matching passage: T1069 Permission Groups Discovery. Tactics: discovery. Description: Adversaries may attempt to discover group and permission settings. This information can help adversaries determine which user accounts and groups are available, the membership of users in particular groups, and which users and groups have elevated permissions. Adversaries may attempt to discover group permission settings in many different ways. This data may provide the adversary with information about the compromised environment that can be used in follow-on activity and targeting.(Citation: CrowdStrike BloodHound April 2018)
Near-miss passage: T1069.001 Local Groups. Tactics: discovery. Description: Adversaries may attempt to find local system groups and permission settings. The knowledge of local system permission groups can help adversaries determine which groups exist and which users belong to a particular group. Adversaries may use this information to determine which users have elevated permissions, such as the users found within the local administrators group. Commands such as <code>net localgroup</code> of the [Net](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0039) utility, <code>dscl . -list /Groups</code> on macOS, and <code>groups</code> on Linux can list local groups.
Query: alert when Detects Executables in the Downloads folder without FileVersion,Description,Product,Company likely created with py2exe
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects Executables in the Downloads folder without FileVersion,Description,Product,Company likely created with py2exe. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Suspicious File Characteristics Due to Missing Fields id: 9637e8a5-7131-4f7f-bdc7-2b05d8670c43 status: test description: Detects Executables in the Downloads folder without FileVersion,Description,Product,Company likely created with py2exe references: - https://securelist.com/muddywater/88059/ - https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/276a765a10f98cda1a38d3a31e7483585ca3722ecad19d784441293acf1b7beb/detection author: Markus Neis, Sander Wiebing date: 2018-11-22 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.execution - attack.t1059.006 logsource: product: windows category: process_creation detection: selection1: Description: \? FileVersion: \? selection2: Description: \? Product: \? selection3: Description: \? Company: \? folder: Image|contains: \Downloads\ condition: (selection1 or selection2 or selection3) and folder falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the PowerShell command lines with special characters. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential PowerShell Command Line Obfuscation id: d7bcd677-645d-4691-a8d4-7a5602b780d1 status: test description: Detects the PowerShell command lines with special characters references: - https://speakerdeck.com/heirhabarov/hunting-for-powershell-abuse?slide=64 author: Teymur Kheirkhabarov (idea), Vasiliy Burov (rule), oscd.community, Tim Shelton (fp) date: 2020-10-15 modified: 2024-04-15 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1027 - attack.t1059.001 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: - \powershell.exe - \pwsh.exe - OriginalFileName: - PowerShell.EXE - pwsh.dll selection_re: - CommandLine|re: \+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+.*\+ - CommandLine|re: \{.*\{.*\{.*\{.*\{.*\{.*\{.*\{.*\{.*\{ - CommandLine|re: \^.*\^.*\^.*\^.*\^ - CommandLine|re: '`.*`.*`.*`.*`' filter_optional_amazonSSM: ParentImage: C:\Program Files\Amazon\SSM\ssm-document-worker.exe filter_optional_defender_atp: CommandLine|contains: - new EventSource("Microsoft.Windows.Sense.Client.Management" - public static extern bool InstallELAMCertificateInfo(SafeFileHandle handle); condition: all of selection_* and not 1 of filter_optional_* falsepositives: - Amazon SSM Document Worker - Windows Defender ATP level: high
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-5575
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5575. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.241 and 19.x before 19.0.0.185 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.521 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 19.0.0.190, Adobe AIR SDK before 19.0.0.190, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 19.0.0.190 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5577, CVE-2015-5578, CVE-2015-5580, CVE-2015-5582, CVE-2015-5588, and CVE-2015-6677.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5772. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Heap-based buffer overflow in SceneKit in Apple OS X before 10.10.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Collada file.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-1913
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1913. CWE: CWE-310. CVSS: 5.0. Rational Test Control Panel in IBM Rational Test Workbench and Rational Test Virtualization Server 8.0.0.x before 8.0.0.5, 8.0.1.x before 8.0.1.6, 8.5.0.x before 8.5.0.4, 8.5.1.x before 8.5.1.5, 8.6.0.x before 8.6.0.4, and 8.7.0.x before 8.7.0.2 uses the MD5 algorithm for password hashing, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass authentication via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2091. CWE: CWE-310. CVSS: 5.0. The authentication hook (mgs_hook_authz) in mod-gnutls 0.5.10 and earlier does not validate client certificates when "GnuTLSClientVerify require" is set, which allows remote attackers to spoof clients via a crafted certificate.
Query: SIEM correlation: command and control activity consistent with Asymmetric Cryptography
Matching passage: T1573.002 Asymmetric Cryptography. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may employ a known asymmetric encryption algorithm to conceal command and control traffic rather than relying on any inherent protections provided by a communication protocol. Asymmetric cryptography, also known as public key cryptography, uses a keypair per party: one public that can be freely distributed, and one private. Due to how the keys are generated, the sender encrypts data with the receiver’s public key and the receiver decrypts the data with their private key. This ensures that only the intended recipient can read the encrypted data. Common public key encryption algorithms include RSA and ElGamal. For efficiency, many protocols (including SSL/TLS) use symmetric cryptography once a connection is established, but use asymmetric cryptography to establish or transmit a key. As such, these protocols are classified as [Asymmetric Cryptography](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1573/002).
Near-miss passage: T1573 Encrypted Channel. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may employ an encryption algorithm to conceal command and control traffic rather than relying on any inherent protections provided by a communication protocol. Despite the use of a secure algorithm, these implementations may be vulnerable to reverse engineering if secret keys are encoded and/or generated within malware samples/configuration files.
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Device Registration
Matching passage: T1098.005 Device Registration. Tactics: persistence, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may register a device to an adversary-controlled account. Devices may be registered in a multifactor authentication (MFA) system, which handles authentication to the network, or in a device management system, which handles device access and compliance. MFA systems, such as Duo or Okta, allow users to associate devices with their accounts in order to complete MFA requirements. An adversary that compromises a user’s credentials may enroll a new device in order to bypass initial MFA requirements and gain persistent access to a network.(Citation: CISA MFA PrintNightmare)(Citation: DarkReading FireEye SolarWinds) In some cases, the MFA self-enrollment process may require only a username and password to enroll the account's first device or to enroll a device to an inactive account. (Citation: Mandiant APT29 Microsoft 365 2022) Similarly, an adversary with existing access to a network may register a device or a virtual machine to Entra ID and/or its device management system, Microsoft Intune, in order to access sensitive data or resources while bypassing conditional access policies.(Citation: AADInternals - Device Registration)(Citation: AADInternals - Conditional Access Bypass)(Citation: Microsoft DEV-0537)(Citation: Expel Atlas Lion 2025) Devices registered in Entra ID may be able to conduct [Internal Spearphishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1534) campaigns via intra-organizational emails, which are less likely to be treated as suspicious by the email client.(Citation: Microsoft - Device Registration) Additionally, an adversary may be able to perform a [Service Exhaustion Flood](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1499/002) on an Entra ID tenant by registering a large number of devices.(Citation: AADInternals - BPRT)
Near-miss passage: T1098 Account Manipulation. Tactics: persistence, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may manipulate accounts to maintain and/or elevate access to victim systems. Account manipulation may consist of any action that preserves or modifies adversary access to a compromised account, such as modifying credentials or permission groups.(Citation: FireEye SMOKEDHAM June 2021) These actions could also include account activity designed to subvert security policies, such as performing iterative password updates to bypass password duration policies and preserve the life of compromised credentials. In order to create or manipulate accounts, the adversary must already have sufficient permissions on systems or the domain. However, account manipulation may also lead to privilege escalation where modifications grant access to additional roles, permissions, or higher-privileged [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078).
Query: describe CVE-2015-6844
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6844. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Reviewer in EMC SourceOne Email Supervisor before 7.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0668. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the administration portal in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server 2.5 and 2.5.99.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuq66737.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-2081
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2081. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Datto ALTO and SIRIS devices allow Remote Code Execution via unauthenticated requests to PHP scripts.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7750. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.0. The L2TP packet processing functionality in Juniper Netscreen and ScreenOS Firewall products with ScreenOS before 6.3.0r13-dnd1, 6.3.0r14 through 6.3.0r18 before 6.3.0r18-dnc1, and 6.3.0r19 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted L2TP packet.
Query: write Sigma for Detects the creation of copy of suspicious files (EXE/DLL) to the default GPO storage folder
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the creation of copy of suspicious files (EXE/DLL) to the default GPO storage folder. Logsource: windows / file_event. Rule: title: Suspicious Files in Default GPO Folder id: 5f87308a-0a5b-4623-ae15-d8fa1809bc60 status: test description: Detects the creation of copy of suspicious files (EXE/DLL) to the default GPO storage folder references: - https://redcanary.com/blog/intelligence-insights-november-2021/ author: elhoim date: 2022-04-28 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1036.005 logsource: product: windows category: file_event detection: selection: TargetFilename|contains: \Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\ TargetFilename|endswith: - .dll - .exe condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects identities attempting to enumerate their Kubernetes RBAC permissions. In the early stages of a breach, attackers. Logsource: kubernetes / application / audit. Rule: title: RBAC Permission Enumeration Attempt id: 84b777bd-c946-4d17-aa2e-c39f5a454325 status: test description: 'Detects identities attempting to enumerate their Kubernetes RBAC permissions. In the early stages of a breach, attackers will aim to list the permissions they have within the compromised environment. In a Kubernetes cluster, this can be achieved by interacting with the API server, and querying the SelfSubjectAccessReview API via e.g. a "kubectl auth can-i --list" command. This will enumerate the Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC) rules defining the compromised user''s authorization. ' references: - https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/security/current/kubernetes-suspicious-self-subject-review.html author: Leo Tsaousis (@laripping) date: 2024-03-26 tags: - attack.t1069.003 - attack.t1087.004 - attack.discovery logsource: category: application product: kubernetes service: audit detection: selection: verb: create apiGroup: authorization.k8s.io objectRef.resource: selfsubjectrulesreviews condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: low
Query: detection engineering for Modify or Spoof Tool UI
Matching passage: T1685.003 Modify or Spoof Tool UI. Tactics: defense impairment. Description: Adversaries may spoof or manipulate security tool user interfaces (UIs) to falsely indicate tools are functioning normally and delay detection and response. Adversaries may present misleading or falsified security tool interfaces (UIs) that display normal or healthy status indicators, even when underlying security tools have been disabled, degraded, or otherwise tampered with. Security tools typically provide visibility into system health, alerting, and operational status; by misrepresenting this information, adversaries can undermine defender trust in these signals and obscure the true security posture of the system. This behavior is often used in conjunction with efforts to disable or modify tools, where adversaries first impair the functionality of defenses (e.g., EDR, logging agents) and then replace or mimic their interfaces to conceal the loss of visibility. By maintaining the appearance of normal operations, such as showing active protection, successful updates, or absence of threats, adversaries can delay investigation and response, enabling continued malicious activity. For example, adversaries may display a fake Windows Security interface or system tray icon indicating a “protected” or “healthy” state after disabling Windows Defender or related services.(Citation: BlackBasta)
Near-miss passage: T1685.002 Disable or Modify Cloud Log. Tactics: defense impairment. Description: An adversary may disable or modify cloud logging capabilities and integrations to limit what data is collected on their activities and avoid detection. Cloud environments allow for collection and analysis of audit and application logs that provide insight into what activities a user does within the environment. If an adversary has sufficient permissions, they can disable or modify logging to avoid detection of their activities. For example, in AWS an adversary may disable CloudWatch/CloudTrail integrations prior to conducting further malicious activity. They may alternatively tamper with logging functionality, for example, by removing any associated SNS topics, disabling multi-region logging, or disabling settings that validate and/or encrypt log files.(Citation: AWS Cloud Trail)(Citation: Pacu Detection Disruption Module) In Office 365, an adversary may disable logging on mail collection activities for specific users by using the Set-MailboxAuditBypassAssociation cmdlet, by disabling M365 Advanced Auditing for the user, or by downgrading the user’s license from an Enterprise E5 to an Enterprise E3 license.(Citation: Dark Reading)
Query: actor TTPs: Web Shell
Matching passage: T1505.003 Web Shell. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may backdoor web servers with web shells to establish persistent access to systems. A Web shell is a Web script that is placed on an openly accessible Web server to allow an adversary to access the Web server as a gateway into a network. A Web shell may provide a set of functions to execute or a command-line interface on the system that hosts the Web server.(Citation: volexity_0day_sophos_FW) In addition to a server-side script, a Web shell may have a client interface program that is used to talk to the Web server (e.g. [China Chopper](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0020) Web shell client).(Citation: Lee 2013)
Near-miss passage: T1505 Server Software Component. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may abuse legitimate extensible development features of servers to establish persistent access to systems. Enterprise server applications may include features that allow developers to write and install software or scripts to extend the functionality of the main application. Adversaries may install malicious components to extend and abuse server applications.(Citation: volexity_0day_sophos_FW)
Query: ATT&CK technique for DNS/Passive DNS
Matching passage: T1596.001 DNS/Passive DNS. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may search DNS data for information about victims that can be used during targeting. DNS information may include a variety of details, including registered name servers as well as records that outline addressing for a target’s subdomains, mail servers, and other hosts. Adversaries may search DNS data to gather actionable information. Threat actors can query nameservers for a target organization directly, or search through centralized repositories of logged DNS query responses (known as passive DNS).(Citation: DNS Dumpster)(Citation: Circl Passive DNS) Adversaries may also seek and target DNS misconfigurations/leaks that reveal information about internal networks. Information from these sources may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Search Victim-Owned Websites](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1594) or [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Acquire Infrastructure](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1583) or [Compromise Infrastructure](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584)), and/or initial access (ex: [External Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1133) or [Trusted Relationship](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1199)).
Near-miss passage: T1596.004 CDNs. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may search content delivery network (CDN) data about victims that can be used during targeting. CDNs allow an organization to host content from a distributed, load balanced array of servers. CDNs may also allow organizations to customize content delivery based on the requestor’s geographical region. Adversaries may search CDN data to gather actionable information. Threat actors can use online resources and lookup tools to harvest information about content servers within a CDN. Adversaries may also seek and target CDN misconfigurations that leak sensitive information not intended to be hosted and/or do not have the same protection mechanisms (ex: login portals) as the content hosted on the organization’s website.(Citation: DigitalShadows CDN) Information from these sources may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Active Scanning](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1595) or [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Acquire Infrastructure](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1583) or [Compromise Infrastructure](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584)), and/or initial access (ex: [Drive-by Compromise](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1189)).
Query: vulnerability: The SAML Web SSO module in Apache CXF before 2.7.18, 3.0.x before 3.0.7, and 3.1.x before 3.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to bypass authentication via a crafted SAML respon
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5253. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 4.0. The SAML Web SSO module in Apache CXF before 2.7.18, 3.0.x before 3.0.7, and 3.1.x before 3.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to bypass authentication via a crafted SAML response with a valid signed assertion, related to a "wrapping attack."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7875. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 7.5. ctools 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.14 and 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.8 in Drupal does not verify the "edit" permission for the "content type" plugins that are used on Panels and similar systems to place content and functionality on a page.
Query: exploit Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended restrictions on JavaScript API execution via unspecified
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3063. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended restrictions on JavaScript API execution via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-3060, CVE-2015-3061, CVE-2015-3062, CVE-2015-3064, CVE-2015-3065, CVE-2015-3066, CVE-2015-3067, CVE-2015-3068, CVE-2015-3069, CVE-2015-3071, CVE-2015-3072, CVE-2015-3073, and CVE-2015-3074.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8001. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 3.5. The chunked upload API (ApiUpload) in MediaWiki before 1.23.11, 1.24.x before 1.24.4, and 1.25.x before 1.25.3 does not restrict the uploaded data to the claimed file size, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via a chunk that exceeds the file size.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-6255
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6255. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Unified Web and E-Mail Interaction Manager 9.0(2) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted chat message, aka Bug ID CSCuo89051.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-10092. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. A vulnerability was found in Qtranslate Slug Plugin up to 1.1.16 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is the function add_slug_meta_box of the file includes/class-qtranslate-slug.php. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.1.17 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 74b3932696f9868e14563e51b7d0bb68c53bf5e4. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-222324.
Query: exploit Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in lib/rails/html/scrubbers.rb in the rails-html-sanitizer gem before 1.0.3 for Ruby on Rails 4.2.x and 5.x allows remote attackers to inje
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7580. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in lib/rails/html/scrubbers.rb in the rails-html-sanitizer gem before 1.0.3 for Ruby on Rails 4.2.x and 5.x allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted CDATA node.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4385. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in unspecified administration pages in the Imagefield Info module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.2 for Drupal allows remote authenticated users with the "Administer image styles" permission to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.