alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: Sigma YAML for macos / process_creation
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detection use of the command "split" to split files into parts and possible transfer.. Logsource: macos / process_creation. Rule: title: Split A File Into Pieces id: 7f2bb9d5-6395-4de5-969c-70c11fbe6b12 status: test description: Detection use of the command "split" to split files into parts and possible transfer. references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1030/T1030.md author: Igor Fits, Mikhail Larin, oscd.community date: 2020-10-15 modified: 2021-11-27 tags: - attack.exfiltration - attack.t1030 logsource: product: macos category: process_creation detection: selection: Image|endswith: /split condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate administrative activity level: low
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects attempts to query system information directly from the Windows Registry.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: System Information Discovery via Registry Queries id: 0022869c-49f7-4ff2-ba03-85ac42ddac58 status: experimental description: Detects attempts to query system information directly from the Windows Registry. references: - https://cert.gov.ua/article/6277849 - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/75fa21076dcefa348a7521403cdd6bfc4e88623c/atomics/T1082/T1082.md - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/75fa21076dcefa348a7521403cdd6bfc4e88623c/atomics/T1124/T1124.md author: lazarg date: 2025-06-12 modified: 2025-10-25 tags: - attack.discovery - attack.t1082 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_cmd_reg: Image|endswith: \reg.exe CommandLine|contains: query CommandLine|contains|windash: -v selection_cmd_powershell: Image|endswith: - \powershell.exe - \pwsh.exe CommandLine|contains: - Get-ItemPropertyValue - gpv selection_keys: CommandLine|contains: - \SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows Defender - \SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion - \SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall - \SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\TimeZoneInformation - \SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services condition: 1 of selection_cmd_* and selection_keys falsepositives: - Unlikely level: low regression_tests_path: regression_data/rules/windows/process_creation/proc_creation_win_discovery_via_reg_queries/info.yml simulation: - type: atomic-red-team name: System Information Discovery technique: T1010 atomic_guid: 66703791-c902-4560-8770-42b8a91f7667 - type: atomic-red-team name: Discover OS Product Name via Registry technique: T1082 atomic_guid: be3b5fe3-a575-4fb8-83f6-ad4a68dd5ce7 - type: atomic-red-team name: Discover OS Build Number via Registry technique: T1082 atomic_guid: acfcd709-0013-4f1e-b9ee-bc1e7bafaaec
Query: hunt for NTDS activity
Matching passage: T1003.003 NTDS. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries may attempt to access or create a copy of the Active Directory domain database in order to steal credential information, as well as obtain other information about domain members such as devices, users, and access rights. By default, the NTDS file (NTDS.dit) is located in <code>%SystemRoot%\NTDS\Ntds.dit</code> of a domain controller.(Citation: Wikipedia Active Directory) In addition to looking for NTDS files on active Domain Controllers, adversaries may search for backups that contain the same or similar information.(Citation: Metcalf 2015) The following tools and techniques can be used to enumerate the NTDS file and the contents of the entire Active Directory hashes. * Volume Shadow Copy * secretsdump.py * Using the in-built Windows tool, ntdsutil.exe * Invoke-NinjaCopy
Near-miss passage: T1003.004 LSA Secrets. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.(Citation: Passcape LSA Secrets)(Citation: Microsoft AD Admin Tier Model)(Citation: Tilbury Windows Credentials) LSA secrets are stored in the registry at <code>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SECURITY\Policy\Secrets</code>. LSA secrets can also be dumped from memory.(Citation: ired Dumping LSA Secrets) [Reg](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0075) can be used to extract from the Registry. [Mimikatz](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0002) can be used to extract secrets from memory.(Citation: ired Dumping LSA Secrets)
Query: secure coding against Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere
Matching passage: CWE-610 Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere. The product uses an externally controlled name or reference that resolves to a resource that is outside of the intended control sphere.
Near-miss passage: CWE-469 Use of Pointer Subtraction to Determine Size. The product subtracts one pointer from another in order to determine size, but this calculation can be incorrect if the pointers do not exist in the same memory chunk.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-4949
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4949. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Databases: Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server 7.1 before 7.1.2, Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server 7.1 before 7.1.2, and Tivoli Storage FlashCopy Manager 4.1 before 4.1.2 place cleartext passwords in exception messages, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading GUI pop-up windows, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6557.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3923. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. Coppermine Photo Gallery before 1.5.36 allows remote attackers to enumerate directories via a full path in the folder parameter to minibrowser.php.
Query: risk of Buffer overflow in the SSLv2 implementation in IBM Domino 8.5.x before 8.5.1 FP5 IF3, 8.5.2 before FP4 IF3, 8.5.3 before FP6 IF6, 9.0 before IF7, and 9.0.1 before FP2 IF3 allows re
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0134. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Buffer overflow in the SSLv2 implementation in IBM Domino 8.5.x before 8.5.1 FP5 IF3, 8.5.2 before FP4 IF3, 8.5.3 before FP6 IF6, 9.0 before IF7, and 9.0.1 before FP2 IF3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1924. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. Stack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1925, CVE-2015-1929, CVE-2015-1930, CVE-2015-1948, CVE-2015-1953, CVE-2015-1954, CVE-2015-1962, CVE-2015-1963, CVE-2015-1964, and CVE-2015-1965.
Query: detect Component Object Model
Matching passage: T1559.001 Component Object Model. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may use the Windows Component Object Model (COM) for local code execution. COM is an inter-process communication (IPC) component of the native Windows application programming interface (API) that enables interaction between software objects, or executable code that implements one or more interfaces.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019) Through COM, a client object can call methods of server objects, which are typically binary Dynamic Link Libraries (DLL) or executables (EXE).(Citation: Microsoft COM) Remote COM execution is facilitated by [Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021) such as [Distributed Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/003) (DCOM).(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019) Various COM interfaces are exposed that can be abused to invoke arbitrary execution via a variety of programming languages such as C, C++, Java, and [Visual Basic](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/005).(Citation: Microsoft COM) Specific COM objects also exist to directly perform functions beyond code execution, such as creating a [Scheduled Task/Job](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1053), fileless download/execution, and other adversary behaviors related to privilege escalation and persistence.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019)(Citation: ProjectZero File Write EoP Apr 2018)
Near-miss passage: T1559 Inter-Process Communication. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms for local code or command execution. IPC is typically used by processes to share data, communicate with each other, or synchronize execution. IPC is also commonly used to avoid situations such as deadlocks, which occurs when processes are stuck in a cyclic waiting pattern. Adversaries may abuse IPC to execute arbitrary code or commands. IPC mechanisms may differ depending on OS, but typically exists in a form accessible through programming languages/libraries or native interfaces such as Windows [Dynamic Data Exchange](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/002) or [Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/001). Linux environments support several different IPC mechanisms, two of which being sockets and pipes.(Citation: Linux IPC) Higher level execution mediums, such as those of [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059)s, may also leverage underlying IPC mechanisms. Adversaries may also use [Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021) such as [Distributed Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/003) to facilitate remote IPC execution.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019)
Query: write Sigma for Detects potential DLL hijack of "iertutil.dll" found in the DCOM InternetExplorer.Application Class over the network
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential DLL hijack of "iertutil.dll" found in the DCOM InternetExplorer.Application Class over the network. Logsource: windows / file_event. Rule: title: Potential DCOM InternetExplorer.Application DLL Hijack id: 2f7979ae-f82b-45af-ac1d-2b10e93b0baa related: - id: e554f142-5cf3-4e55-ace9-a1b59e0def65 type: obsolete - id: f354eba5-623b-450f-b073-0b5b2773b6aa type: similar status: test description: Detects potential DLL hijack of "iertutil.dll" found in the DCOM InternetExplorer.Application Class over the network references: - https://threathunterplaybook.com/hunts/windows/201009-RemoteDCOMIErtUtilDLLHijack/notebook.html author: Roberto Rodriguez @Cyb3rWard0g, Open Threat Research (OTR), wagga date: 2020-10-12 modified: 2022-12-18 tags: - attack.lateral-movement - attack.t1021.002 - attack.t1021.003 logsource: product: windows category: file_event detection: selection: Image: System TargetFilename|endswith: \Internet Explorer\iertutil.dll condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: critical
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects new user account creation. Logsource: okta / okta. Rule: title: New Okta User Created id: b6c718dd-8f53-4b9f-98d8-93fdca966969 status: test description: Detects new user account creation author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-10-25 modified: 2026-04-27 references: - https://developer.okta.com/docs/reference/api/event-types/ tags: - attack.credential-access logsource: service: okta product: okta detection: selection: eventType: user.lifecycle.create condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate and authorized user creation level: informational
Query: intelligence brief on T1620
Matching passage: T1620 Reflective Code Loading. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may reflectively load code into a process in order to conceal the execution of malicious payloads. Reflective loading involves allocating then executing payloads directly within the memory of the process, vice creating a thread or process backed by a file path on disk (e.g., [Shared Modules](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1129)). Reflectively loaded payloads may be compiled binaries, anonymous files (only present in RAM), or just snubs of fileless executable code (ex: position-independent shellcode).(Citation: Introducing Donut)(Citation: S1 Custom Shellcode Tool)(Citation: Stuart ELF Memory)(Citation: 00sec Droppers)(Citation: Mandiant BYOL) For example, the `Assembly.Load()` method executed by [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) may be abused to load raw code into the running process.(Citation: Microsoft AssemblyLoad) Reflective code injection is very similar to [Process Injection](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1055) except that the “injection” loads code into the processes’ own memory instead of that of a separate process. Reflective loading may evade process-based detections since the execution of the arbitrary code may be masked within a legitimate or otherwise benign process. Reflectively loading payloads directly into memory may also avoid creating files or other artifacts on disk, while also enabling malware to keep these payloads encrypted (or otherwise obfuscated) until execution.(Citation: Stuart ELF Memory)(Citation: 00sec Droppers)(Citation: Intezer ACBackdoor)(Citation: S1 Old Rat New Tricks)
Near-miss passage: T1218.008 Odbcconf. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may abuse odbcconf.exe to proxy execution of malicious payloads. Odbcconf.exe is a Windows utility that allows you to configure Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) drivers and data source names.(Citation: Microsoft odbcconf.exe) The Odbcconf.exe binary may be digitally signed by Microsoft. Adversaries may abuse odbcconf.exe to bypass application control solutions that do not account for its potential abuse. Similar to [Regsvr32](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1218/010), odbcconf.exe has a <code>REGSVR</code> flag that can be misused to execute DLLs (ex: <code>odbcconf.exe /S /A &lbrace;REGSVR "C:\Users\Public\file.dll"&rbrace;</code>). (Citation: LOLBAS Odbcconf)(Citation: TrendMicro Squiblydoo Aug 2017)(Citation: TrendMicro Cobalt Group Nov 2017)
Query: vulnerability: The SAML 2.0 implementation in AdNovum nevisAuth 4.13.0.0 before 4.18.3.1, when using SAML POST-Binding, does not match all attributes of the X.509 certificate embedded in the asse
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5372. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 5.0. The SAML 2.0 implementation in AdNovum nevisAuth 4.13.0.0 before 4.18.3.1, when using SAML POST-Binding, does not match all attributes of the X.509 certificate embedded in the assertion against the certificate from the identity provider (IdP), which allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SAML assertions via a crafted certificate.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-10083. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. A vulnerability has been found in harrystech Dynosaur-Rails and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function basic_auth of the file app/controllers/application_controller.rb. The manipulation leads to improper authentication. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is named 04b223813f0e336aab50bff140d0f5889c31dbec. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-221503.
Query: vulnerability: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the edit comment dialog in bkr/server/widgets.py in Beaker 20.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3162. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 5.400000095367432. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the edit comment dialog in bkr/server/widgets.py in Beaker 20.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via writing a crafted comment on an acked or nacked canceled job.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9374. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Stripe Add-on for iThemes Exchange before 1.2.0 for WordPress has XSS via add_query_arg() and remove_query_arg().
Query: risk of Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in opac-addbybiblionumber.pl in Koha 3.14.x before 3.14.16, 3.16.x before 3.16.12, and 3.20.x before 3.20.1 allows remote attackers to inje
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4639. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in opac-addbybiblionumber.pl in Koha 3.14.x before 3.14.16, 3.16.x before 3.16.12, and 3.20.x before 3.20.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted list name.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0970. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SearchBlox before 8.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Query: risk of MITRE is populating this ID because it was assigned prior to Lenovo becoming a CNA. A race condition was reported (fixed and publicly disclosed in 2015) in Lenovo System Update ver
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7335. CWE: CWE-362. CVSS: 7.0. MITRE is populating this ID because it was assigned prior to Lenovo becoming a CNA. A race condition was reported (fixed and publicly disclosed in 2015) in Lenovo System Update version 5.07.0008 and prior that could allow a user to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1865. CWE: CWE-362. CVSS: 5.099999904632568. fts.c in coreutils 8.4 allows local users to delete arbitrary files.
Query: risk of The uglify-js package before 2.6.0 for Node.js allows attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input in a parse call, aka a "regular expression denial o
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8858. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 7.5. The uglify-js package before 2.6.0 for Node.js allows attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input in a parse call, aka a "regular expression denial of service (ReDoS)."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5162. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 7.5. The image parser in OpenStack Cinder 7.0.2 and 8.0.0 through 8.1.1; Glance before 11.0.1 and 12.0.0; and Nova before 12.0.4 and 13.0.0 does not properly limit qemu-img calls, which might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and disk consumption) via a crafted disk image.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-0192
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0192. CWE: CWE-269. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Java 8 before SR1, 7 R1 before SR2 FP11, 7 before SR9, 6 R1 before SR8 FP4, 6 before SR16 FP4, and 5.0 before SR16 FP10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to the Java Virtual Machine.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8467. CWE: CWE-269. CVSS: 7.5. The samldb_check_user_account_control_acl function in dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 does not properly check for administrative privileges during creation of machine accounts, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the existence of a domain with both a Samba DC and a Windows DC, a similar issue to CVE-2015-2535.
Query: vulnerability: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Collaborative Edition 9.1, 10.1, 11.0, 11.3, and 11.4 before FP03 allows remote authenticated user
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1968. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 3.5. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Collaborative Edition 9.1, 10.1, 11.0, 11.3, and 11.4 before FP03 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2932. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in MediaWiki before 1.19.24, 1.2x before 1.23.9, and 1.24.x before 1.24.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an animated href XLink element.
Query: adversary uses Domain Generation Algorithms
Matching passage: T1568.002 Domain Generation Algorithms. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may make use of Domain Generation Algorithms (DGAs) to dynamically identify a destination domain for command and control traffic rather than relying on a list of static IP addresses or domains. This has the advantage of making it much harder for defenders to block, track, or take over the command and control channel, as there potentially could be thousands of domains that malware can check for instructions.(Citation: Cybereason Dissecting DGAs)(Citation: Cisco Umbrella DGA)(Citation: Unit 42 DGA Feb 2019) DGAs can take the form of apparently random or “gibberish” strings (ex: istgmxdejdnxuyla.ru) when they construct domain names by generating each letter. Alternatively, some DGAs employ whole words as the unit by concatenating words together instead of letters (ex: cityjulydish.net). Many DGAs are time-based, generating a different domain for each time period (hourly, daily, monthly, etc). Others incorporate a seed value as well to make predicting future domains more difficult for defenders.(Citation: Cybereason Dissecting DGAs)(Citation: Cisco Umbrella DGA)(Citation: Talos CCleanup 2017)(Citation: Akamai DGA Mitigation) Adversaries may use DGAs for the purpose of [Fallback Channels](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1008). When contact is lost with the primary command and control server malware may employ a DGA as a means to reestablishing command and control.(Citation: Talos CCleanup 2017)(Citation: FireEye POSHSPY April 2017)(Citation: ESET Sednit 2017 Activity)
Near-miss passage: T1568.001 Fast Flux DNS. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may use Fast Flux DNS to hide a command and control channel behind an array of rapidly changing IP addresses linked to a single domain resolution. This technique uses a fully qualified domain name, with multiple IP addresses assigned to it which are swapped with high frequency, using a combination of round robin IP addressing and short Time-To-Live (TTL) for a DNS resource record.(Citation: MehtaFastFluxPt1)(Citation: MehtaFastFluxPt2)(Citation: Fast Flux - Welivesecurity) The simplest, "single-flux" method, involves registering and de-registering an addresses as part of the DNS A (address) record list for a single DNS name. These registrations have a five-minute average lifespan, resulting in a constant shuffle of IP address resolution.(Citation: Fast Flux - Welivesecurity) In contrast, the "double-flux" method registers and de-registers an address as part of the DNS Name Server record list for the DNS zone, providing additional resilience for the connection. With double-flux additional hosts can act as a proxy to the C2 host, further insulating the true source of the C2 channel.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-6502
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6502. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the console in Puppet Enterprise before 2015.2.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the string parameter, related to Login Redirect.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2217. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Ultimate PHP Board (aka myUPB) before 2.2.8 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) q parameter to search.php or (2) avatar parameter to profile.php.