alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: rule covering Detects a highly relevant Antivirus alert that reports a remote access tool. This event must not be ignored just because
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects a highly relevant Antivirus alert that reports a remote access tool. This event must not be ignored just because. Logsource: antivirus. Rule: title: Antivirus - Remote Access Tools Signature id: 97233998-3838-4581-88c6-f1d19d3993fb status: experimental description: 'Detects a highly relevant Antivirus alert that reports a remote access tool. This event must not be ignored just because the AV has blocked the malware but investigate, how it came there in the first place. ' references: - https://www.nextron-systems.com/?s=antivirus - https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/d9669f7e3eb3a9cdf6a750eeb2ba303b5ae148a43e36546896f1d1801e912466 author: Arnim Rupp (Nextron Systems) date: 2026-06-15 tags: - attack.execution - attack.t1203 - attack.command-and-control - attack.t1219.002 logsource: category: antivirus detection: selection: Signature|contains: - AgentB - AgentTesla - AMRat - Ammyy - AsyncRAT - Bandook - Bitrat - Bladabindi - Connectwise - CyberGate - DarkComet - DCrat - Delf - DokStorm - Egairtigado - Gh0st - Gorat - GodRat - Jalapeno - LummaC2 - Minirat - Netwire - NanoCore - NJRat - Paralax - PlugX - Pulsar - Quasar - Remcos - Ravartar - RemoteAdmin - RemoteTool - revengeRAT - rokRAT - salatstealer - Salgorea - SmokedHam - TigerRat - Tzeebot - WarZone - VenomRAT - Vidar - Wirenet - XWorm - Zapchast - Zegost condition: selection falsepositives: - Unlikely level: critical
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects when a Kubernetes CronJob or Job is created or modified. A Kubernetes Job creates one or more pods to accomplish. Logsource: kubernetes / audit. Rule: title: Kubernetes CronJob/Job Modification id: 0c9b3bda-41a6-4442-9345-356ae86343dc related: - id: cd3a808c-c7b7-4c50-a2f3-f4cfcd436435 type: similar status: test description: 'Detects when a Kubernetes CronJob or Job is created or modified. A Kubernetes Job creates one or more pods to accomplish a specific task, and a CronJob creates Jobs on a recurring schedule. An adversary can take advantage of this Kubernetes object to schedule Jobs to run containers that execute malicious code within a cluster, allowing them to achieve persistence. ' references: - https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/config-api/apiserver-audit.v1/ - https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/protecting-kubernetes-against-mitre-attck-persistence#technique-33-kubernetes-cronjob author: kelnage date: 2024-07-11 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.execution logsource: product: kubernetes service: audit detection: selection: objectRef.apiGroup: batch objectRef.resource: - cronjobs - jobs verb: - create - delete - patch - replace - update condition: selection falsepositives: - Modifying a Kubernetes Job or CronJob may need to be done by a system administrator. - Automated processes may need to take these actions and may need to be filtered. level: medium
Query: alert when Detects the use of getsystem Meterpreter/Cobalt Strike command by detecting a specific service starting
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the use of getsystem Meterpreter/Cobalt Strike command by detecting a specific service starting. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Meterpreter/CobaltStrike Activity id: 15619216-e993-4721-b590-4c520615a67d status: test description: Detects the use of getsystem Meterpreter/Cobalt Strike command by detecting a specific service starting references: - https://speakerdeck.com/heirhabarov/hunting-for-privilege-escalation-in-windows-environment - https://blog.cobaltstrike.com/2014/04/02/what-happens-when-i-type-getsystem/ author: Teymur Kheirkhabarov, Ecco, Florian Roth date: 2019-10-26 modified: 2023-02-05 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth - attack.t1134.001 - attack.t1134.002 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: ParentImage|endswith: \services.exe selection_technique_1: CommandLine|contains|all: - /c - echo - \pipe\ CommandLine|contains: - cmd - '%COMSPEC%' selection_technique_2: CommandLine|contains|all: - rundll32 - .dll,a - '/p:' filter_defender: CommandLine|contains: MpCmdRun condition: selection_img and 1 of selection_technique_* and not 1 of filter_* falsepositives: - Commandlines containing components like cmd accidentally - Jobs and services started with cmd level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects execution of Sysinternals tools via an AppX package. Attackers could install the Sysinternals Suite to get acces. Logsource: windows / appmodel-runtime. Rule: title: Sysinternals Tools AppX Versions Execution id: d29a20b2-be4b-4827-81f2-3d8a59eab5fc status: test description: 'Detects execution of Sysinternals tools via an AppX package. Attackers could install the Sysinternals Suite to get access to tools such as psexec and procdump to avoid detection based on System paths. ' references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/microsoft-store author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-01-16 modified: 2023-09-12 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth logsource: product: windows service: appmodel-runtime detection: selection: EventID: 201 ImageName: - procdump.exe - psloglist.exe - psexec.exe - livekd.exe - ADExplorer.exe condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate usage of sysinternals applications from the Windows Store will trigger this. Apply exclusions as needed. level: low
Query: telemetry for T1559
Matching passage: T1559 Inter-Process Communication. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms for local code or command execution. IPC is typically used by processes to share data, communicate with each other, or synchronize execution. IPC is also commonly used to avoid situations such as deadlocks, which occurs when processes are stuck in a cyclic waiting pattern. Adversaries may abuse IPC to execute arbitrary code or commands. IPC mechanisms may differ depending on OS, but typically exists in a form accessible through programming languages/libraries or native interfaces such as Windows [Dynamic Data Exchange](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/002) or [Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/001). Linux environments support several different IPC mechanisms, two of which being sockets and pipes.(Citation: Linux IPC) Higher level execution mediums, such as those of [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059)s, may also leverage underlying IPC mechanisms. Adversaries may also use [Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021) such as [Distributed Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/003) to facilitate remote IPC execution.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019)
Near-miss passage: T1559.003 XPC Services. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries can provide malicious content to an XPC service daemon for local code execution. macOS uses XPC services for basic inter-process communication between various processes, such as between the XPC Service daemon and third-party application privileged helper tools. Applications can send messages to the XPC Service daemon, which runs as root, using the low-level XPC Service <code>C API</code> or the high level <code>NSXPCConnection API</code> in order to handle tasks that require elevated privileges (such as network connections). Applications are responsible for providing the protocol definition which serves as a blueprint of the XPC services. Developers typically use XPC Services to provide applications stability and privilege separation between the application client and the daemon.(Citation: creatingXPCservices)(Citation: Designing Daemons Apple Dev) Adversaries can abuse XPC services to execute malicious content. Requests for malicious execution can be passed through the application's XPC Services handler.(Citation: CVMServer Vuln)(Citation: Learn XPC Exploitation) This may also include identifying and abusing improper XPC client validation and/or poor sanitization of input parameters to conduct [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1068).
Query: risk of Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/registration/register.php in Moodle through 2.6.11, 2.7.x before 2.7.11, 2.8.x before 2.8.9, and 2.9.x before 2.9.3 allows 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5335. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/registration/register.php in Moodle through 2.6.11, 2.7.x before 2.7.11, 2.8.x before 2.8.9, and 2.9.x before 2.9.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that send statistics to an arbitrary hub URL.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5825. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. WebKit in Apple iOS before 9 does not properly restrict the availability of Performance API times, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about the browser history, mouse movement, or network traffic via crafted JavaScript code.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-5073
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5073. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.100000381469727. Heap-based buffer overflow in the find_fixedlength function in pcre_compile.c in PCRE before 8.38 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or obtain sensitive information from heap memory and possibly bypass the ASLR protection mechanism via a crafted regular expression with an excess closing parenthesis.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8073. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. mediaserver in Android 4.4 and 5.1 before 5.1.1 LMY48X allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted media file, aka internal bug 14388161, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6608 and CVE-2015-8072.
Query: detection rule: Rule to detect the Hybrid Connection Manager service installation.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Rule to detect the Hybrid Connection Manager service installation.. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: HybridConnectionManager Service Installation id: 0ee4d8a5-4e67-4faf-acfa-62a78457d1f2 status: test description: Rule to detect the Hybrid Connection Manager service installation. references: - https://twitter.com/Cyb3rWard0g/status/1381642789369286662 author: Roberto Rodriguez (Cyb3rWard0g), OTR (Open Threat Research) date: 2021-04-12 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.t1554 logsource: product: windows service: security definition: The 'System Security Extension' audit subcategory need to be enabled to log the EID 4697 detection: selection: EventID: 4697 ServiceName: HybridConnectionManager ServiceFileName|contains: HybridConnectionManager condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate use of Hybrid Connection Manager via Azure function apps. level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects Obfuscated Powershell via use MSHTA in Scripts. Logsource: windows / ps_script. Rule: title: Invoke-Obfuscation Via Use MSHTA - PowerShell id: e55a5195-4724-480e-a77e-3ebe64bd3759 status: test description: Detects Obfuscated Powershell via use MSHTA in Scripts references: - https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/issues/1009 author: Nikita Nazarov, oscd.community date: 2020-10-08 modified: 2022-11-29 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1027 - attack.execution - attack.t1059.001 logsource: product: windows category: ps_script definition: 'Requirements: Script Block Logging must be enabled' detection: selection_4104: ScriptBlockText|contains|all: - set - '&&' - mshta - vbscript:createobject - .run - (window.close) condition: selection_4104 falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: risk of Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy and inject arbitrary web script or HTM
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0072. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy and inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving an IFRAME element that triggers a redirect, a second IFRAME element that does not trigger a redirect, and an eval of a WindowProxy object, aka "Universal XSS (UXSS)."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2665. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cacti before 0.8.8d allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Query: exploit Integer overflow in the FontData::Bound function in data/font_data.cc in Google sfntly, as used in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of s
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6781. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 7.5. Integer overflow in the FontData::Bound function in data/font_data.cc in Google sfntly, as used in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted offset or length value within font data in an SFNT container.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7205. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 10.0. Integer underflow in the RTPReceiverVideo::ParseRtpPacket function in Mozilla Firefox before 43.0 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.5 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial of service, or possibly have unspecified other impact by triggering a crafted WebRTC RTP packet.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-8387
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8387. CWE: CWE-190. CVSS: 7.300000190734863. PCRE before 8.38 mishandles (?123) subroutine calls and related subroutine calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4042. CWE: CWE-190. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Integer overflow in the keycompare_mb function in sort.c in sort in GNU Coreutils through 8.23 might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via long strings.
Query: exploit The ANSendForSharedReview method in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.16 and 11.x before 11.0.13, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30094, and Acrobat a
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6725. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. The ANSendForSharedReview method in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.16 and 11.x before 11.0.13, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30094, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.009.20069 on Windows and OS X allows attackers to bypass JavaScript API execution restrictions via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6707, CVE-2015-6708, CVE-2015-6709, CVE-2015-6710, CVE-2015-6711, CVE-2015-6712, CVE-2015-6713, CVE-2015-6714, CVE-2015-6715, CVE-2015-6716, CVE-2015-6717, CVE-2015-6718, CVE-2015-6719, CVE-2015-6720, CVE-2015-6721, CVE-2015-6722, CVE-2015-6723, CVE-2015-6724, CVE-2015-7614, CVE-2015-7616, CVE-2015-7618, CVE-2015-7619, CVE-2015-7620, and CVE-2015-7623.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8413. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, and CVE-2015-8454.
Query: write Sigma for Detects the usage of the "Squirrel.exe" to download arbitrary files. This binary is part of multiple Electron based soft
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the usage of the "Squirrel.exe" to download arbitrary files. This binary is part of multiple Electron based soft. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Arbitrary File Download Via Squirrel.EXE id: 1e75c1cc-c5d4-42aa-ac3d-91b0b68b3b4c related: - id: 45239e6a-b035-4aaf-b339-8ad379fcb67e type: similar - id: fa4b21c9-0057-4493-b289-2556416ae4d7 type: obsolete status: test description: 'Detects the usage of the "Squirrel.exe" to download arbitrary files. This binary is part of multiple Electron based software installations (Slack, Teams, Discord, etc.) ' references: - https://lolbas-project.github.io/lolbas/OtherMSBinaries/Squirrel/ - http://www.hexacorn.com/blog/2019/03/30/sqirrel-packages-manager-as-a-lolbin-a-k-a-many-electron-apps-are-lolbins-by-default/ - http://www.hexacorn.com/blog/2018/08/16/squirrel-as-a-lolbin/ author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems), Karneades / Markus Neis, Jonhnathan Ribeiro, oscd.community date: 2022-06-09 modified: 2023-11-09 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1218 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: Image|endswith: - \squirrel.exe - \update.exe selection_download_cli: CommandLine|contains: - ' --download ' - ' --update ' - ' --updateRollback=' selection_download_http_keyword: CommandLine|contains: http condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Expected FP with some Electron based applications such as (1Clipboard, Beaker Browser, Caret, Discord, GitHub Desktop, etc.) level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects a Windows command line executable started from MMC. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: MMC Spawning Windows Shell id: 05a2ab7e-ce11-4b63-86db-ab32e763e11d status: test description: Detects a Windows command line executable started from MMC references: - https://enigma0x3.net/2017/01/05/lateral-movement-using-the-mmc20-application-com-object/ author: Karneades, Swisscom CSIRT date: 2019-08-05 modified: 2022-07-14 tags: - attack.lateral-movement - attack.t1021.003 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection1: ParentImage|endswith: \mmc.exe selection2: - Image|endswith: - \cmd.exe - \powershell.exe - \pwsh.exe - \wscript.exe - \cscript.exe - \sh.exe - \bash.exe - \reg.exe - \regsvr32.exe - Image|contains: \BITSADMIN condition: all of selection* level: high
Query: risk of Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.302 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.203 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.481 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3136. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.302 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.203 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.481 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.180, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.180, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 18.0.0.180 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-3118, CVE-2015-3124, CVE-2015-3127, CVE-2015-3128, CVE-2015-3129, CVE-2015-3131, CVE-2015-3132, CVE-2015-3137, CVE-2015-4428, CVE-2015-4430, and CVE-2015-5117.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7042. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The kernel in Apple iOS before 9.2, OS X before 10.11.2, tvOS before 9.1, and watchOS before 2.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted app, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7040, CVE-2015-7041, and CVE-2015-7043.
Query: what is T1134.002
Matching passage: T1134.002 Create Process with Token. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may create a new process with an existing token to escalate privileges and bypass access controls. Processes can be created with the token and resulting security context of another user using features such as <code>CreateProcessWithTokenW</code> and <code>runas</code>.(Citation: Microsoft RunAs) Creating processes with a token not associated with the current user may require the credentials of the target user, specific privileges to impersonate that user, or access to the token to be used. For example, the token could be duplicated via [Token Impersonation/Theft](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001) or created via [Make and Impersonate Token](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/003) before being used to create a process. While this technique is distinct from [Token Impersonation/Theft](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001), the techniques can be used in conjunction where a token is duplicated and then used to create a new process.
Near-miss passage: T1134 Access Token Manipulation. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token. An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. [Token Impersonation/Theft](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001)) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. [Create Process with Token](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/002)). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation) Any standard user can use the <code>runas</code> command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.