alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Invalid Code Signature
Matching passage: T1036.001 Invalid Code Signature. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may attempt to mimic features of valid code signatures to increase the chance of deceiving a user, analyst, or tool. Code signing provides a level of authenticity on a binary from the developer and a guarantee that the binary has not been tampered with. Adversaries can copy the metadata and signature information from a signed program, then use it as a template for an unsigned program. Files with invalid code signatures will fail digital signature validation checks, but they may appear more legitimate to users and security tools may improperly handle these files.(Citation: Threatexpress MetaTwin 2017) Unlike [Code Signing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1553/002), this activity will not result in a valid signature.
Near-miss passage: T1036.010 Masquerade Account Name. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may match or approximate the names of legitimate accounts to make newly created ones appear benign. This will typically occur during [Create Account](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1136), although accounts may also be renamed at a later date. This may also coincide with [Account Access Removal](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1531) if the actor first deletes an account before re-creating one with the same name.(Citation: Huntress MOVEit 2023) Often, adversaries will attempt to masquerade as service accounts, such as those associated with legitimate software, data backups, or container cluster management.(Citation: Elastic CUBA Ransomware 2022)(Citation: Aquasec Kubernetes Attack 2023) They may also give accounts generic, trustworthy names, such as “admin”, “help”, or “root.”(Citation: Invictus IR Cloud Ransomware 2024) Sometimes adversaries may model account names off of those already existing in the system, as a follow-on behavior to [Account Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1087). Note that this is distinct from [Impersonation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1684/001), which describes impersonating specific trusted individuals or organizations, rather than user or service account names.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-4471
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4471. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Off-by-one error in the lzxd_decompress function in lzxd.c in libmspack before 0.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer under-read and application crash) via a crafted CAB archive.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1794. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 5.0. The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in ssl/s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a zero p value in an anonymous Diffie-Hellman (DH) ServerKeyExchange message.
Query: risk of OpenStack Compute (nova) 2015.1 through 2015.1.1, 2014.2.3, and earlier does not stop the migration process when the instance is deleted, which allows remote authenticated users to
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3241. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. OpenStack Compute (nova) 2015.1 through 2015.1.1, 2014.2.3, and earlier does not stop the migration process when the instance is deleted, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (disk, network, and other resource consumption) by resizing and then deleting an instance.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0775. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 5.0. The banner (aka MOTD) implementation in Cisco NX-OS 4.1(2)E1(1f) on Nexus 4000 devices, 5.2(1)SV3(2.1) on Nexus 1000V devices, 6.0(2)N2(2) on Nexus 5000 devices, 6.2(11) on MDS 9000 devices, 6.2(12) on Nexus 7000 devices, 7.0(3) on Nexus 9000 devices, and 7.2(0)ZN(99.67) on Nexus 3000 devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (login process reset) via an unspecified terminal-session request during TELNET session setup, aka Bug IDs CSCuo10554, CSCuu75466, CSCuu75471, CSCuu75484, CSCuu75498, CSCuu77170, and CSCuu77182.
Query: exploit Directory traversal vulnerability in the doPost method of the Rtrlet class in Novell ZENworks Configuration Management (ZCM) allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0781. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Directory traversal vulnerability in the doPost method of the Rtrlet class in Novell ZENworks Configuration Management (ZCM) allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2965. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 4.0. Directory traversal vulnerability in osCommerce Japanese 2.2ms1j-R8 and earlier allows remote authenticated administrators to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Query: risk of Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u45 and Java SE Embedded 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Security.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2659. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.0. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u45 and Java SE Embedded 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Security.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2017. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 through 6.1.0.47, 7.0 before 7.0.0.39, 8.0 before 8.0.0.12, and 8.5 before 8.5.5.8 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted URL.
Query: weakness Privilege Chaining
Matching passage: CWE-268 Privilege Chaining. Two distinct privileges, roles, capabilities, or rights can be combined in a way that allows an entity to perform unsafe actions that would not be allowed without that combination.
Near-miss passage: CWE-1311 Improper Translation of Security Attributes by Fabric Bridge. The bridge incorrectly translates security attributes from either trusted to untrusted or from untrusted to trusted when converting from one fabric protocol to another.
Query: exploit Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Taxonomy Path module before 7.x-1.2 for Drupal allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "Lin
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3385. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 3.5. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Taxonomy Path module before 7.x-1.2 for Drupal allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "Link to path" field formatter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-10021. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. A vulnerability was found in ritterim definely. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file src/database.js. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is b31a022ba4d8d17148445a13ebb5a42ad593dbaa. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217608.
Query: what is T1567.004
Matching passage: T1567.004 Exfiltration Over Webhook. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a webhook endpoint rather than over their primary command and control channel. Webhooks are simple mechanisms for allowing a server to push data over HTTP/S to a client without the need for the client to continuously poll the server.(Citation: RedHat Webhooks) Many public and commercial services, such as Discord, Slack, and `webhook.site`, support the creation of webhook endpoints that can be used by other services, such as Github, Jira, or Trello.(Citation: Discord Intro to Webhooks) When changes happen in the linked services (such as pushing a repository update or modifying a ticket), these services will automatically post the data to the webhook endpoint for use by the consuming application. Adversaries may link an adversary-owned environment to a victim-owned SaaS service to achieve repeated [Automated Exfiltration](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1020) of emails, chat messages, and other data.(Citation: Push Security SaaS Attacks Repository Webhooks) Alternatively, instead of linking the webhook endpoint to a service, an adversary can manually post staged data directly to the URL in order to exfiltrate it.(Citation: Microsoft SQL Server) Access to webhook endpoints is often over HTTPS, which gives the adversary an additional level of protection. Exfiltration leveraging webhooks can also blend in with normal network traffic if the webhook endpoint points to a commonly used SaaS application or collaboration service.(Citation: CyberArk Labs Discord)(Citation: Talos Discord Webhook Abuse)(Citation: Checkmarx Webhooks)
Near-miss passage: T1567.002 Exfiltration to Cloud Storage. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a cloud storage service rather than over their primary command and control channel. Cloud storage services allow for the storage, edit, and retrieval of data from a remote cloud storage server over the Internet. Examples of cloud storage services include Dropbox and Google Docs. Exfiltration to these cloud storage services can provide a significant amount of cover to the adversary if hosts within the network are already communicating with the service.
Query: secure coding against Relative Path Traversal
Matching passage: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as .. that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory.
Near-miss passage: CWE-451 User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information. The user interface (UI) does not properly represent critical information to the user, allowing the information - or its source - to be obscured or spoofed. This is often a component in phishing attacks.
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Network Devices
Matching passage: T1584.008 Network Devices. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise third-party network devices that can be used during targeting. Network devices, such as small office/home office (SOHO) routers, may be compromised where the adversary's ultimate goal is not [Initial Access](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0001) to that environment, but rather to leverage these devices to support additional targeting. Once an adversary has control, compromised network devices can be used to launch additional operations, such as hosting payloads for [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) campaigns (i.e., [Link Target](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1608/005)) or enabling the required access to execute [Content Injection](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1659) operations. Adversaries may also be able to harvest reusable credentials (i.e., [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078)) from compromised network devices. Adversaries often target Internet-facing edge devices and related network appliances that specifically do not support robust host-based defenses.(Citation: Mandiant Fortinet Zero Day)(Citation: Wired Russia Cyberwar) Compromised network devices may be used to support subsequent [Command and Control](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0011) activity, such as [Hide Infrastructure](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1665) through an established [Proxy](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1090) and/or [Botnet](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584/005) network.(Citation: Justice GRU 2024)
Near-miss passage: T1584.005 Botnet. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise numerous third-party systems to form a botnet that can be used during targeting. A botnet is a network of compromised systems that can be instructed to perform coordinated tasks.(Citation: Norton Botnet) Instead of purchasing/renting a botnet from a booter/stresser service, adversaries may build their own botnet by compromising numerous third-party systems.(Citation: Imperva DDoS for Hire) Adversaries may also conduct a takeover of an existing botnet, such as redirecting bots to adversary-controlled C2 servers.(Citation: Dell Dridex Oct 2015) With a botnet at their disposal, adversaries may perform follow-on activity such as large-scale [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) or Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS).
Query: describe CVE-2015-6668
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6668. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 7.5. The Job Manager plugin before 0.7.25 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary CV files via a brute force attack to the WordPress upload directory structure, related to an insecure direct object reference.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2748. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. Websense TRITON AP-WEB before 8.0.0 does not properly restrict access to files in explorer_wse/, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request to a (1) Web Security incident report or the (2) Explorer configuration (websense.ini) file.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-2191
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2191. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 5.0. Integer overflow in the dissect_tnef function in epan/dissectors/packet-tnef.c in the TNEF dissector in Wireshark 1.10.x before 1.10.13 and 1.12.x before 1.12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted length field in a packet.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4022. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 7.5. Integer overflow in the ftp_genlist function in ext/ftp/ftp.c in PHP before 5.4.41, 5.5.x before 5.5.25, and 5.6.x before 5.6.9 allows remote FTP servers to execute arbitrary code via a long reply to a LIST command, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0738
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0738. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web Tracking Report page on Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) devices 8.5.0-497 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an unspecified field, aka Bug ID CSCuu16008.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1026. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ZOHO ManageEngine ADManager Plus before 6.2 Build 6270 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) technicianSearchText parameter to the Help Desk Technician page or (2) rolesSearchText parameter to the Help Desk Roles.
Query: vulnerability: The Good for Enterprise application 3.0.0.415 for Android does not use signature protection for its Authentication Delegation API intent. Also, the Good Dynamic application activat
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9232. CWE: CWE-345. CVSS: 5.300000190734863. The Good for Enterprise application 3.0.0.415 for Android does not use signature protection for its Authentication Delegation API intent. Also, the Good Dynamic application activation process does not attempt to detect malicious activation attempts involving modified names beginning with a com.good.gdgma substring. Consequently, an attacker could obtain access to intranet data. This issue is only relevant in cases where the user has already downloaded a malicious Android application.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5236. CWE: CWE-345. CVSS: 7.5. It was discovered that the IcedTea-Web used codebase attribute of the <applet> tag on the HTML page that hosts Java applet in the Same Origin Policy (SOP) checks. As the specified codebase does not have to match the applet's actual origin, this allowed malicious site to bypass SOP via spoofed codebase value.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-6401
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6401. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 7.5. Cisco EPC3928 devices with EDVA 5.5.10, 5.5.11, and 5.7.1 allow remote attackers to bypass an intended authentication requirement and execute unspecified administrative functions via a crafted HTTP request, aka Bug ID CSCux24941.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6397. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Cisco RV110W, RV130W, and RV215W devices have an incorrect RBAC configuration for the default account, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain root access via a login session with that account, aka Bug IDs CSCuv90139, CSCux58175, and CSCux73557.
Query: detection rule: Detect usage of the "unregmp2.exe" binary as a proxy to launch a custom version of "wmpnscfg.exe"
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detect usage of the "unregmp2.exe" binary as a proxy to launch a custom version of "wmpnscfg.exe". Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Lolbin Unregmp2.exe Use As Proxy id: 727454c0-d851-48b0-8b89-385611ab0704 status: test description: Detect usage of the "unregmp2.exe" binary as a proxy to launch a custom version of "wmpnscfg.exe" references: - https://lolbas-project.github.io/lolbas/Binaries/Unregmp2/ author: frack113 date: 2022-12-29 modified: 2024-06-04 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1218 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \unregmp2.exe - OriginalFileName: unregmp2.exe selection_cmd: CommandLine|contains|windash: ' /HideWMP' condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects execution of the "mshta" utility with an argument containing the "http" keyword, which could indicate that an at. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Remotely Hosted HTA File Executed Via Mshta.EXE id: b98d0db6-511d-45de-ad02-e82a98729620 status: test description: Detects execution of the "mshta" utility with an argument containing the "http" keyword, which could indicate that an attacker is executing a remotely hosted malicious hta file references: - https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/22/e/avoslocker-ransomware-variant-abuses-driver-file-to-disable-anti-Virus-scans-log4shell.html author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-08-08 modified: 2023-02-06 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1218.005 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \mshta.exe - OriginalFileName: MSHTA.EXE selection_cli: CommandLine|contains: - http:// - https:// - ftp:// condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: Persistence mechanism resembling Acquire Infrastructure
Matching passage: T1583 Acquire Infrastructure. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may buy, lease, rent, or obtain infrastructure that can be used during targeting. A wide variety of infrastructure exists for hosting and orchestrating adversary operations. Infrastructure solutions include physical or cloud servers, domains, and third-party web services.(Citation: TrendmicroHideoutsLease) Some infrastructure providers offer free trial periods, enabling infrastructure acquisition at limited to no cost.(Citation: Free Trial PurpleUrchin) Additionally, botnets are available for rent or purchase. Use of these infrastructure solutions allows adversaries to stage, launch, and execute operations. Solutions may help adversary operations blend in with traffic that is seen as normal, such as contacting third-party web services or acquiring infrastructure to support [Proxy](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1090), including from residential proxy services.(Citation: amnesty_nso_pegasus)(Citation: FBI Proxies Credential Stuffing)(Citation: Mandiant APT29 Microsoft 365 2022) Depending on the implementation, adversaries may use infrastructure that makes it difficult to physically tie back to them as well as utilize infrastructure that can be rapidly provisioned, modified, and shut down.
Near-miss passage: T1583.004 Server. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may buy, lease, rent, or obtain physical servers that can be used during targeting. Use of servers allows an adversary to stage, launch, and execute an operation. During post-compromise activity, adversaries may utilize servers for various tasks, such as watering hole operations in [Drive-by Compromise](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1189), enabling [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) operations, or facilitating [Command and Control](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0011). Instead of compromising a third-party [Server](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584/004) or renting a [Virtual Private Server](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1583/003), adversaries may opt to configure and run their own servers in support of operations. Free trial periods of cloud servers may also be abused.(Citation: Free Trial PurpleUrchin)(Citation: Freejacked) Adversaries may only need a lightweight setup if most of their activities will take place using online infrastructure. Or, they may need to build extensive infrastructure if they want to test, communicate, and control other aspects of their activities on their own systems.(Citation: NYTStuxnet)
Query: risk of Qolsys IQ Panel (aka QOL) before 1.5.1 does not verify the digital signatures of software updates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass intended access restrictions v
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6033. CWE: CWE-310. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Qolsys IQ Panel (aka QOL) before 1.5.1 does not verify the digital signatures of software updates, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a modified update.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5655. CWE: CWE-310. CVSS: 5.800000190734863. The Adways Party Track SDK before 1.6.6 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Query: describe CVE-2015-1770
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1770. CWE: CWE-824. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Microsoft Office 2013 SP1 and 2013 RT SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document, aka "Microsoft Office Uninitialized Memory Use Vulnerability."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4315. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.5. The Call Policy Configuration page in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expressway X8.5.3 improperly validates external DTDs, which allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service via a crafted XML document, aka Bug ID CSCuv31853.
Query: risk of The Jetpack plugin before 3.4.3 for WordPress has XSS via add_query_arg() and remove_query_arg().
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9359. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. The Jetpack plugin before 3.4.3 for WordPress has XSS via add_query_arg() and remove_query_arg().
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8006. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the PageTriage toolbar in the PageTriage extension for MediWiki allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the page title.
Query: weakness Untrusted Search Path
Matching passage: CWE-426 Untrusted Search Path. The product searches for critical resources using an externally-supplied search path that can point to resources that are not under the product's direct control.
Near-miss passage: CWE-144 Improper Neutralization of Line Delimiters. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as line delimiters when they are sent to a downstream component.
Query: vulnerability: IBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR1 FP10, 7 R1 before SR3 FP10, 7 before SR9 FP10, 6 R1 before SR8 FP7, 6 before SR16 FP7, and 5.0 before 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1931. CWE: CWE-312. CVSS: 5.5. IBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR1 FP10, 7 R1 before SR3 FP10, 7 before SR9 FP10, 6 R1 before SR8 FP7, 6 before SR16 FP7, and 5.0 before SR16 FP13 stores plaintext information in memory dumps, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3952. CWE: CWE-312. CVSS: 7.5. Wireless keys are stored in plain text on Hospira Plum A+ Infusion System version 13.4 and prior, Plum A+3 Infusion System version 13.6 and prior, and Symbiq Infusion System, version 3.13 and prior. Hospira recommends that customers close Port 20/FTP and Port 23/TELNET on the affected devices. Hospira has also released the Plum 360 Infusion System which is not vulnerable to this issue.