alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: detection rule: Detects a CodePage modification using the "mode.com" utility to Russian language. This behavior has been used by threat
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects a CodePage modification using the "mode.com" utility to Russian language. This behavior has been used by threat. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: CodePage Modification Via MODE.COM To Russian Language id: 12fbff88-16b5-4b42-9754-cd001a789fb3 related: - id: d48c5ffa-3b02-4c0f-9a9e-3c275650dd0e type: derived status: test description: 'Detects a CodePage modification using the "mode.com" utility to Russian language. This behavior has been used by threat actors behind Dharma ransomware. ' references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/intl/code-page-identifiers - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/mode - https://strontic.github.io/xcyclopedia/library/mode.com-59D1ED51ACB8C3D50F1306FD75F20E99.html - https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/5e75ef02517afd6e8ba6462b19217dc4a5a574abb33d10eb0f2bab49d8d48c22/behavior author: Joseliyo Sanchez, @Joseliyo_Jstnk date: 2024-01-17 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1036 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \mode.com - OriginalFileName: MODE.COM selection_cli: CommandLine|contains|all: - ' con ' - ' cp ' - ' select=' CommandLine|endswith: - =1251 - =866 condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Russian speaking people changing the CodePage level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects DNS server discovery via LDAP query requests from uncommon applications. Logsource: windows / dns_query. Rule: title: DNS Server Discovery Via LDAP Query id: a21bcd7e-38ec-49ad-b69a-9ea17e69509e status: test description: Detects DNS server discovery via LDAP query requests from uncommon applications references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/980f3f83fd81f37c1ca9c02dccfd1c3d9f9d0841/atomics/T1016/T1016.md#atomic-test-9---dns-server-discovery-using-nslookup - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-adts/7fcdce70-5205-44d6-9c3a-260e616a2f04 author: frack113 date: 2022-08-20 modified: 2023-09-18 tags: - attack.discovery - attack.t1482 logsource: product: windows category: dns_query detection: selection: QueryName|startswith: _ldap. filter_main_generic: Image|contains: - :\Program Files\ - :\Program Files (x86)\ - :\Windows\ filter_main_defender: Image|contains: :\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Defender\Platform\ Image|endswith: \MsMpEng.exe filter_main_unknown: Image: <unknown process> filter_optional_azure: Image|startswith: C:\WindowsAzure\GuestAgent filter_main_null: Image: null filter_optional_browsers: Image|endswith: - \chrome.exe - \firefox.exe - \opera.exe condition: selection and not 1 of filter_main_* and not 1 of filter_optional_* falsepositives: - Likely level: low
Query: SOC runbook when seeing Outbound C2 pattern associated with Code Repositories
Matching passage: Playbook for T1593.003 Code Repositories. 1) Validate alert telemetry against T1593.003. 2) Scope affected hosts and accounts. 3) Contain by isolating endpoint / disabling account if confirmed. 4) Hunt for related tactics: reconnaissance. 5) Eradicate persistence and recover. Reference detection notes: Adversaries may search public code repositories for information about victims that can be used during targeting. Victims may store code in repositories on various third-party websites such as GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge, and BitBucket. Users typically interact with code repositories through a web application or command-line utilities such as git. Adversaries may search various public code reposito
Near-miss passage: Playbook for T1593 Search Open Websites/Domains. Different response path focused on reconnaissance.
Query: write Sigma for Detects the execution of the PoC that can be used to exploit Sysmon CVE-2022-41120
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the execution of the PoC that can be used to exploit Sysmon CVE-2022-41120. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: HackTool - SysmonEOP Execution id: 8a7e90c5-fe6e-45dc-889e-057fe4378bd9 status: test description: Detects the execution of the PoC that can be used to exploit Sysmon CVE-2022-41120 references: - https://github.com/Wh04m1001/SysmonEoP author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-12-04 modified: 2024-11-23 tags: - cve.2022-41120 - attack.t1068 - attack.privilege-escalation logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: Image|endswith: \SysmonEOP.exe selection_hash: Hashes|contains: - IMPHASH=22F4089EB8ABA31E1BB162C6D9BF72E5 - IMPHASH=5123FA4C4384D431CD0D893EEB49BBEC condition: 1 of selection_* falsepositives: - Unlikely level: critical
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the change of database master password. It may be a part of data exfiltration.. Logsource: aws / cloudtrail. Rule: title: AWS RDS Master Password Change id: 8a63cdd4-6207-414a-85bc-7e032bd3c1a2 status: test description: Detects the change of database master password. It may be a part of data exfiltration. references: - https://github.com/RhinoSecurityLabs/pacu/blob/866376cd711666c775bbfcde0524c817f2c5b181/pacu/modules/rds__explore_snapshots/main.py author: faloker date: 2020-02-12 modified: 2022-10-05 tags: - attack.exfiltration - attack.t1020 logsource: product: aws service: cloudtrail detection: selection_source: eventSource: rds.amazonaws.com responseElements.pendingModifiedValues.masterUserPassword|contains: '*' eventName: ModifyDBInstance condition: selection_source falsepositives: - Benign changes to a db instance level: medium
Query: EDR alert: possible Data from Information Repositories (T1213)
Matching passage: T1213 Data from Information Repositories. Tactics: collection. Description: Adversaries may leverage information repositories to mine valuable information. Information repositories are tools that allow for storage of information, typically to facilitate collaboration or information sharing between users, and can store a wide variety of data that may aid adversaries in further objectives, such as Credential Access, Lateral Movement, or Defense Evasion, or direct access to the target information. Adversaries may also abuse external sharing features to share sensitive documents with recipients outside of the organization (i.e., [Transfer Data to Cloud Account](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1537)). The following is a brief list of example information that may hold potential value to an adversary and may also be found on an information repository: * Policies, procedures, and standards * Physical / logical network diagrams * System architecture diagrams * Technical system documentation * Testing / development credentials (i.e., [Unsecured Credentials](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552)) * Work / project schedules * Source code snippets * Links to network shares and other internal resources * Contact or other sensitive information about business partners and customers, including personally identifiable information (PII) Information stored in a repository may vary based on the specific instance or environment. Specific common information repositories include the following: * Storage services such as IaaS databases, enterprise databases, and more specialized platforms such as customer relationship management (CRM) databases * Collaboration platforms such as SharePoint, Confluence, and code repositories * Messaging platforms such as Slack and Microsoft Teams In some cases, information repositories have been improperly secured, typically by unintentionally allowing for overly-broad access by all users or even public access to unauthenticated users. This is particularly common with cloud-native or cloud-hosted services, such as AWS Relat
Near-miss passage: T1213.001 Confluence. Tactics: collection. Description: Adversaries may leverage Confluence repositories to mine valuable information. Often found in development environments alongside Atlassian JIRA, Confluence is generally used to store development-related documentation, however, in general may contain more diverse categories of useful information, such as: * Policies, procedures, and standards * Physical / logical network diagrams * System architecture diagrams * Technical system documentation * Testing / development credentials (i.e., [Unsecured Credentials](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552)) * Work / project schedules * Source code snippets * Links to network shares and other internal resources
Query: hunt for Invalid Code Signature activity
Matching passage: T1036.001 Invalid Code Signature. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may attempt to mimic features of valid code signatures to increase the chance of deceiving a user, analyst, or tool. Code signing provides a level of authenticity on a binary from the developer and a guarantee that the binary has not been tampered with. Adversaries can copy the metadata and signature information from a signed program, then use it as a template for an unsigned program. Files with invalid code signatures will fail digital signature validation checks, but they may appear more legitimate to users and security tools may improperly handle these files.(Citation: Threatexpress MetaTwin 2017) Unlike [Code Signing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1553/002), this activity will not result in a valid signature.
Near-miss passage: T1036.011 Overwrite Process Arguments. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may modify a process's in-memory arguments to change its name in order to appear as a legitimate or benign process. On Linux, the operating system stores command-line arguments in the process’s stack and passes them to the `main()` function as the `argv` array. The first element, `argv[0]`, typically contains the process name or path - by default, the command used to actually start the process (e.g., `cat /etc/passwd`). By default, the Linux `/proc` filesystem uses this value to represent the process name. The `/proc/<PID>/cmdline` file reflects the contents of this memory, and tools like `ps` use it to display process information. Since arguments are stored in user-space memory at launch, this modification can be performed without elevated privileges. During runtime, adversaries can erase the memory used by all command-line arguments for a process, overwriting each argument string with null bytes. This removes evidence of how the process was originally launched. They can then write a spoofed string into the memory region previously occupied by `argv[0]` to mimic a benign command, such as `cat resolv.conf`. The new command-line string is reflected in `/proc/<PID>/cmdline` and displayed by tools like `ps`.(Citation: Sandfly BPFDoor 2022)(Citation: Microsoft XorDdos Linux Stealth 2022)
Query: describe CVE-2015-5101
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5101. CWE: CWE-416. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.008.20082 on Windows and OS X allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4448, CVE-2015-5095, CVE-2015-5099, CVE-2015-5111, CVE-2015-5113, and CVE-2015-5114.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8822. CWE: CWE-416. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted MPEG-4 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, CVE-2015-8454, CVE-2015-8653, CVE-2015-8655, and CVE-2015-8821.
Query: adversary uses Inter-Process Communication
Matching passage: T1559 Inter-Process Communication. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms for local code or command execution. IPC is typically used by processes to share data, communicate with each other, or synchronize execution. IPC is also commonly used to avoid situations such as deadlocks, which occurs when processes are stuck in a cyclic waiting pattern. Adversaries may abuse IPC to execute arbitrary code or commands. IPC mechanisms may differ depending on OS, but typically exists in a form accessible through programming languages/libraries or native interfaces such as Windows [Dynamic Data Exchange](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/002) or [Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/001). Linux environments support several different IPC mechanisms, two of which being sockets and pipes.(Citation: Linux IPC) Higher level execution mediums, such as those of [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059)s, may also leverage underlying IPC mechanisms. Adversaries may also use [Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021) such as [Distributed Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/003) to facilitate remote IPC execution.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019)
Near-miss passage: T1559.003 XPC Services. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries can provide malicious content to an XPC service daemon for local code execution. macOS uses XPC services for basic inter-process communication between various processes, such as between the XPC Service daemon and third-party application privileged helper tools. Applications can send messages to the XPC Service daemon, which runs as root, using the low-level XPC Service <code>C API</code> or the high level <code>NSXPCConnection API</code> in order to handle tasks that require elevated privileges (such as network connections). Applications are responsible for providing the protocol definition which serves as a blueprint of the XPC services. Developers typically use XPC Services to provide applications stability and privilege separation between the application client and the daemon.(Citation: creatingXPCservices)(Citation: Designing Daemons Apple Dev) Adversaries can abuse XPC services to execute malicious content. Requests for malicious execution can be passed through the application's XPC Services handler.(Citation: CVMServer Vuln)(Citation: Learn XPC Exploitation) This may also include identifying and abusing improper XPC client validation and/or poor sanitization of input parameters to conduct [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1068).
Query: Sigma YAML for windows / registry_event
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the presence of a registry key created during Azorult execution. Logsource: windows / registry_event. Rule: title: Registry Entries For Azorult Malware id: f7f9ab88-7557-4a69-b30e-0a8f91b3a0e7 status: test description: Detects the presence of a registry key created during Azorult execution references: - https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/threat-encyclopedia/malware/trojan.win32.azoruit.a author: Trent Liffick date: 2020-05-08 modified: 2021-11-27 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.execution - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1112 logsource: product: windows category: registry_event detection: selection: EventID: - 12 - 13 TargetObject|contains: SYSTEM\ TargetObject|endswith: \services\localNETService condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: critical
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects scheduled task creations or modification to be run with high privileges on a suspicious schedule type. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Suspicious Schtasks Schedule Type With High Privileges id: 7a02e22e-b885-4404-b38b-1ddc7e65258a related: - id: 24c8392b-aa3c-46b7-a545-43f71657fe98 type: similar status: test description: Detects scheduled task creations or modification to be run with high privileges on a suspicious schedule type references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/schtasks-change - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/schtasks-create author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-08-31 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.persistence - attack.execution - attack.t1053.005 logsource: product: windows category: process_creation detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \schtasks.exe - OriginalFileName: schtasks.exe selection_time: CommandLine|contains: - ' ONLOGON ' - ' ONSTART ' - ' ONCE ' - ' ONIDLE ' selection_privs: CommandLine|contains: - NT AUT - ' SYSTEM' - HIGHEST condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Some installers were seen using this method of creation unfortunately. Filter them in your environment level: medium
Query: CWE for Reliance on Security Through Obscurity
Matching passage: CWE-656 Reliance on Security Through Obscurity. The product uses a protection mechanism whose strength depends heavily on its obscurity, such that knowledge of its algorithms or key data is sufficient to defeat the mechanism.
Near-miss passage: CWE-453 Insecure Default Variable Initialization. The product, by default, initializes an internal variable with an insecure or less secure value than is possible.
Query: risk of IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager 3.0 before 3.0.1.6 iFix7 Interim Fix 1 and 4.0 before 4.0.7 iFix10 allow remote authenticated users with access to lifecycle projects to 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7484. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager 3.0 before 3.0.1.6 iFix7 Interim Fix 1 and 4.0 before 4.0.7 iFix10 allow remote authenticated users with access to lifecycle projects to obtain sensitive information by sending a crafted URL to the Lifecycle Query Engine. IBM X-Force ID: 108619.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7421. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 3.700000047683716. Unspecified vulnerability in GSKit on IBM MQ M2000 appliances before 8.0.0.4 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7420.
Query: exploit Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco FireSIGHT System Software 5.3.1.1 and 6.0.0 in FireSIGHT Management Center allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary w
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0707. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 3.5. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco FireSIGHT System Software 5.3.1.1 and 6.0.0 in FireSIGHT Management Center allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an unspecified parameter, aka Bug ID CSCus85425.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4490. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The nsCSPHostSrc::permits function in dom/security/nsCSPUtils.cpp in Mozilla Firefox before 40.0 does not implement the Content Security Policy Level 2 exceptions for the blob, data, and filesystem URL schemes during wildcard source-expression matching, which might make it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks by leveraging unexpected policy-enforcement behavior.
Query: exploit IBM Tivoli Security Directory Server 6.0 before iFix 75, 6.1 before iFix 68, 6.2 before iFix 44, 6.3 before iFix 37, 6.3.1 before iFix 11, and 6.4 before iFix 2 does not prevent ca
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2019. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. IBM Tivoli Security Directory Server 6.0 before iFix 75, 6.1 before iFix 68, 6.2 before iFix 44, 6.3 before iFix 37, 6.3.1 before iFix 11, and 6.4 before iFix 2 does not prevent caching of documents retrieved in SSL sessions, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging an unattended workstation.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0275. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 4.900000095367432. The ext4_zero_range function in fs/ext4/extents.c in the Linux kernel before 4.1 allows local users to cause a denial of service (BUG) via a crafted fallocate zero-range request.
Query: campaign using PowerShell Profile
Matching passage: T1546.013 PowerShell Profile. Tactics: privilege escalation, persistence. Description: Adversaries may gain persistence and elevate privileges by executing malicious content triggered by PowerShell profiles. A PowerShell profile (<code>profile.ps1</code>) is a script that runs when [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) starts and can be used as a logon script to customize user environments. [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) supports several profiles depending on the user or host program. For example, there can be different profiles for [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) host programs such as the PowerShell console, PowerShell ISE or Visual Studio Code. An administrator can also configure a profile that applies to all users and host programs on the local computer. (Citation: Microsoft About Profiles) Adversaries may modify these profiles to include arbitrary commands, functions, modules, and/or [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) drives to gain persistence. Every time a user opens a [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) session the modified script will be executed unless the <code>-NoProfile</code> flag is used when it is launched. (Citation: ESET Turla PowerShell May 2019) An adversary may also be able to escalate privileges if a script in a PowerShell profile is loaded and executed by an account with higher privileges, such as a domain administrator. (Citation: Wits End and Shady PowerShell Profiles)
Near-miss passage: T1546.009 AppCert DLLs. Tactics: privilege escalation, persistence. Description: Adversaries may establish persistence and/or elevate privileges by executing malicious content triggered by AppCert DLLs loaded into processes. Dynamic-link libraries (DLLs) that are specified in the <code>AppCertDLLs</code> Registry key under <code>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\</code> are loaded into every process that calls the ubiquitously used application programming interface (API) functions <code>CreateProcess</code>, <code>CreateProcessAsUser</code>, <code>CreateProcessWithLoginW</code>, <code>CreateProcessWithTokenW</code>, or <code>WinExec</code>. (Citation: Elastic Process Injection July 2017) Similar to [Process Injection](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1055), this value can be abused to obtain elevated privileges by causing a malicious DLL to be loaded and run in the context of separate processes on the computer. Malicious AppCert DLLs may also provide persistence by continuously being triggered by API activity.
Query: exploit Directory traversal vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.4.4 allows remote administrators to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1551. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 4.0. Directory traversal vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.4.4 allows remote administrators to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7031. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 5.0. The Web Service component in Apple OS X Server before 5.0.15 omits an unspecified HTTP header configuration, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via unknown vectors.