alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: Sigma rule for Detects commands that indicate a Raccine removal from an end system. Raccine is a free ransomware protection tool.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects commands that indicate a Raccine removal from an end system. Raccine is a free ransomware protection tool.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Raccine Uninstall id: a31eeaed-3fd5-478e-a8ba-e62c6b3f9ecc status: test description: Detects commands that indicate a Raccine removal from an end system. Raccine is a free ransomware protection tool. references: - https://github.com/Neo23x0/Raccine author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-01-21 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1685 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection1: CommandLine|contains|all: - 'taskkill ' - RaccineSettings.exe selection2: CommandLine|contains|all: - reg.exe - delete - Raccine Tray selection3: CommandLine|contains|all: - schtasks - /DELETE - Raccine Rules Updater condition: 1 of selection* falsepositives: - Legitimate deinstallation by administrative staff level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects code integrity failures such as missing page hashes or corrupted drivers due unauthorized modification. This cou. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: Failed Code Integrity Checks id: 470ec5fa-7b4e-4071-b200-4c753100f49b status: stable description: 'Detects code integrity failures such as missing page hashes or corrupted drivers due unauthorized modification. This could be a sign of tampered binaries. ' references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-10/security/threat-protection/auditing/event-5038 - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-10/security/threat-protection/auditing/event-6281 author: Thomas Patzke date: 2019-12-03 modified: 2025-01-19 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1027.001 logsource: product: windows service: security detection: selection: EventID: - 5038 - 6281 filter_optional_crowdstrike: param1|contains: - \CSFalconServiceUninstallTool_ - \Program Files\CrowdStrike\ - \System32\drivers\CrowdStrike\ - \Windows\System32\ScriptControl64_ filter_optional_sophos: param1|contains: \Program Files\Sophos\ condition: selection and not 1 of filter_optional_* falsepositives: - Disk device errors level: informational
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-2414
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2414. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 through 11 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive browsing-history information via vectors related to image caching, aka "Internet Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1676. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allow local users to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism via a crafted function call, aka "Microsoft Windows Kernel Memory Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1677, CVE-2015-1678, CVE-2015-1679, and CVE-2015-1680.
Query: describe CVE-2015-0888
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0888. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 6.400000095367432. KENT-WEB Clip Board before 4.1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0889. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. KENT-WEB Joyful Note before 5.3 allows remote attackers to delete files or write to files, and consequently execute arbitrary code, via vectors involving an article.
Query: vulnerability: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in blocklayered-ajax.php in the blocklayered module in PrestaShop 1.6.0.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web scrip
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1175. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in blocklayered-ajax.php in the blocklayered module in PrestaShop 1.6.0.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the layered_price_slider parameter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9276. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. SmarterTools SmarterMail before 13.3.5535 was vulnerable to stored XSS by bypassing the anti-XSS mechanisms. It was possible to run JavaScript code when a victim user opens or replies to the attacker's email, which contained a malicious payload. Therefore, users' passwords could be reset by using an XSS attack, as the password reset page did not need the current password.
Query: SOC alert related to Command Obfuscation
Matching passage: T1027.010 Command Obfuscation. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may obfuscate content during command execution to impede detection. Command-line obfuscation is a method of making strings and patterns within commands and scripts more difficult to signature and analyze. This type of obfuscation can be included within commands executed by delivered payloads (e.g., [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) and [Drive-by Compromise](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1189)) or interactively via [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059).(Citation: Akamai JS)(Citation: Malware Monday VBE) For example, adversaries may abuse syntax that utilizes various symbols and escape characters (such as spacing, `^`, `+`. `$`, and `%`) to make commands difficult to analyze while maintaining the same intended functionality.(Citation: RC PowerShell) Many languages support built-in obfuscation in the form of base64 or URL encoding.(Citation: Microsoft PowerShellB64) Adversaries may also manually implement command obfuscation via string splitting (`“Wor”+“d.Application”`), order and casing of characters (`rev <<<'dwssap/cte/ tac'`), globing (`mkdir -p '/tmp/:&$NiA'`), as well as various tricks involving passing strings through tokens/environment variables/input streams.(Citation: Bashfuscator Command Obfuscators)(Citation: FireEye Obfuscation June 2017) Adversaries may also use tricks such as directory traversals to obfuscate references to the binary being invoked by a command (`C:\voi\pcw\..\..\Windows\tei\qs\k\..\..\..\system32\erool\..\wbem\wg\je\..\..\wmic.exe shadowcopy delete`).(Citation: Twitter Richard WMIC) Tools such as <code>Invoke-Obfuscation</code> and <code>Invoke-DOSfucation</code> have also been used to obfuscate commands.(Citation: Invoke-DOSfuscation)(Citation: Invoke-Obfuscation)
Near-miss passage: T1027.001 Binary Padding. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may use binary padding to add junk data and change the on-disk representation of malware. This can be done without affecting the functionality or behavior of a binary, but can increase the size of the binary beyond what some security tools are capable of handling due to file size limitations. Binary padding effectively changes the checksum of the file and can also be used to avoid hash-based blocklists and static anti-virus signatures.(Citation: ESET OceanLotus) The padding used is commonly generated by a function to create junk data and then appended to the end or applied to sections of malware.(Citation: Securelist Malware Tricks April 2017) Increasing the file size may decrease the effectiveness of certain tools and detection capabilities that are not designed or configured to scan large files. This may also reduce the likelihood of being collected for analysis. Public file scanning services, such as VirusTotal, limits the maximum size of an uploaded file to be analyzed.(Citation: VirusTotal FAQ)
Query: alert when This detection uses Windows security events to detect suspicious access attempts to the registry key of Azure AD Health
Matching passage: Sigma rule: This detection uses Windows security events to detect suspicious access attempts to the registry key of Azure AD Health. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: Azure AD Health Monitoring Agent Registry Keys Access id: ff151c33-45fa-475d-af4f-c2f93571f4fe status: test description: 'This detection uses Windows security events to detect suspicious access attempts to the registry key of Azure AD Health monitoring agent. This detection requires an access control entry (ACE) on the system access control list (SACL) of the following securable object HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft Online\Reporting\MonitoringAgent. ' references: - https://o365blog.com/post/hybridhealthagent/ - https://github.com/OTRF/Set-AuditRule/blob/c3dec5443414231714d850565d364ca73475ade5/rules/registry/aad_connect_health_monitoring_agent.yml author: Roberto Rodriguez (Cyb3rWard0g), OTR (Open Threat Research), MSTIC date: 2021-08-26 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.discovery - attack.t1012 logsource: product: windows service: security detection: selection: EventID: - 4656 - 4663 ObjectType: Key ObjectName: \REGISTRY\MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft Online\Reporting\MonitoringAgent filter: ProcessName|contains: - Microsoft.Identity.Health.Adfs.DiagnosticsAgent.exe - Microsoft.Identity.Health.Adfs.InsightsService.exe - Microsoft.Identity.Health.Adfs.MonitoringAgent.Startup.exe - Microsoft.Identity.Health.Adfs.PshSurrogate.exe - Microsoft.Identity.Health.Common.Clients.ResourceMonitor.exe condition: selection and not filter falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects Obfuscated use of Environment Variables to execute PowerShell. Logsource: windows / ps_script. Rule: title: Invoke-Obfuscation VAR+ Launcher - PowerShell id: 0adfbc14-0ed1-11eb-adc1-0242ac120002 status: test description: Detects Obfuscated use of Environment Variables to execute PowerShell references: - https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/issues/1009 author: Jonathan Cheong, oscd.community date: 2020-10-15 modified: 2024-04-05 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1027 - attack.execution - attack.t1059.001 logsource: product: windows category: ps_script definition: 'Requirements: Script Block Logging must be enabled' detection: selection_4104: ScriptBlockText|re: cmd.{0,5}(?:/c|/r)(?:\s|)"set\s[a-zA-Z]{3,6}.*(?:\{\d\}){1,}\\"\s+?-f(?:.*\)){1,}.*" condition: selection_4104 falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: alert when Detects changes to the security groups associated with an Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) or Application Load Balancer (ALB)
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects changes to the security groups associated with an Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) or Application Load Balancer (ALB). Logsource: aws / cloudtrail. Rule: title: LoadBalancer Security Group Modification id: 7a4409fc-f8ca-45f6-8006-127d779eaad9 status: test description: 'Detects changes to the security groups associated with an Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) or Application Load Balancer (ALB). This can indicate that a misconfiguration allowing more traffic into the system than required, or could indicate that an attacker is attempting to enable new connections into a VPC or subnet controlled by the account. ' references: - https://www.gorillastack.com/blog/real-time-events/important-aws-cloudtrail-security-events-tracking/ author: jamesc-grafana date: 2024-07-11 tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1190 logsource: product: aws service: cloudtrail detection: selection: eventSource: elasticloadbalancing.amazonaws.com eventName: - ApplySecurityGroupsToLoadBalancer - SetSecurityGroups condition: selection falsepositives: - Repurposing of an ELB or ALB to serve a different or additional application - Changes to security groups to allow for new services to be deployed level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Adversaries can interact with the DACLs using built-in Windows commands takeown which can grant adversaries higher permi. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Suspicious Recursive Takeown id: 554601fb-9b71-4bcc-abf4-21a611be4fde status: test description: Adversaries can interact with the DACLs using built-in Windows commands takeown which can grant adversaries higher permissions on specific files and folders references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/takeown - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1222.001/T1222.001.md#atomic-test-1---take-ownership-using-takeown-utility author: frack113 date: 2022-01-30 modified: 2022-11-21 tags: - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1222.001 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: Image|endswith: \takeown.exe CommandLine|contains|all: - '/f ' - /r condition: selection falsepositives: - Scripts created by developers and admins - Administrative activity level: medium
Query: describe CVE-2015-1486
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1486. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 7.5. The management console in Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM) 12.1 before 12.1-RU6-MP1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted password-reset action that triggers a new administrative session.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0198. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 10.0. IBM General Parallel File System (GPFS) 3.4 before 3.4.0.32, 3.5 before 3.5.0.24, and 4.1 before 4.1.0.7 in certain cipherList configurations allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary programs as root via unspecified vectors.
Query: CWE for Authentication Bypass: OpenSSL CTX Object Modified after SSL Objects are Created
Matching passage: CWE-593 Authentication Bypass: OpenSSL CTX Object Modified after SSL Objects are Created. The product modifies the SSL context after connection creation has begun.
Near-miss passage: CWE-1263 Improper Physical Access Control. The product is designed with access restricted to certain information, but it does not sufficiently protect against an unauthorized actor with physical access to these areas.
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Inter-Process Communication
Matching passage: T1559 Inter-Process Communication. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms for local code or command execution. IPC is typically used by processes to share data, communicate with each other, or synchronize execution. IPC is also commonly used to avoid situations such as deadlocks, which occurs when processes are stuck in a cyclic waiting pattern. Adversaries may abuse IPC to execute arbitrary code or commands. IPC mechanisms may differ depending on OS, but typically exists in a form accessible through programming languages/libraries or native interfaces such as Windows [Dynamic Data Exchange](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/002) or [Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/001). Linux environments support several different IPC mechanisms, two of which being sockets and pipes.(Citation: Linux IPC) Higher level execution mediums, such as those of [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059)s, may also leverage underlying IPC mechanisms. Adversaries may also use [Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021) such as [Distributed Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/003) to facilitate remote IPC execution.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019)
Near-miss passage: T1559.001 Component Object Model. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may use the Windows Component Object Model (COM) for local code execution. COM is an inter-process communication (IPC) component of the native Windows application programming interface (API) that enables interaction between software objects, or executable code that implements one or more interfaces.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019) Through COM, a client object can call methods of server objects, which are typically binary Dynamic Link Libraries (DLL) or executables (EXE).(Citation: Microsoft COM) Remote COM execution is facilitated by [Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021) such as [Distributed Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/003) (DCOM).(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019) Various COM interfaces are exposed that can be abused to invoke arbitrary execution via a variety of programming languages such as C, C++, Java, and [Visual Basic](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/005).(Citation: Microsoft COM) Specific COM objects also exist to directly perform functions beyond code execution, such as creating a [Scheduled Task/Job](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1053), fileless download/execution, and other adversary behaviors related to privilege escalation and persistence.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019)(Citation: ProjectZero File Write EoP Apr 2018)
Query: alert when Detects suspicious command sequence that JexBoss
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects suspicious command sequence that JexBoss. Logsource: linux. Rule: title: JexBoss Command Sequence id: 8ec2c8b4-557a-4121-b87c-5dfb3a602fae status: test description: Detects suspicious command sequence that JexBoss references: - https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/analysis-reports/AR18-312A author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2017-08-24 modified: 2025-11-22 tags: - attack.execution - attack.t1059.004 logsource: product: linux detection: keywords: '|all': - bash -c /bin/bash - '&/dev/tcp/' condition: keywords falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects Microsoft Excel loading an Add-In (.xll) file from an uncommon location. Logsource: windows / image_load. Rule: title: Microsoft Excel Add-In Loaded From Uncommon Location id: af4c4609-5755-42fe-8075-4effb49f5d44 related: - id: c5f4b5cb-4c25-4249-ba91-aa03626e3185 type: derived status: test description: Detects Microsoft Excel loading an Add-In (.xll) file from an uncommon location references: - https://www.mandiant.com/resources/blog/lnk-between-browsers - https://wazuh.com/blog/detecting-xll-files-used-for-dropping-fin7-jssloader-with-wazuh/ author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-05-12 tags: - attack.execution - attack.t1204.002 logsource: category: image_load product: windows detection: selection: Image|endswith: \excel.exe ImageLoaded|contains: - \Desktop\ - \Downloads\ - \Perflogs\ - \Temp\ - \Users\Public\ - \Windows\Tasks\ ImageLoaded|endswith: .xll condition: selection falsepositives: - Some tuning might be required to allow or remove certain locations used by the rule if you consider them as safe locations level: medium
Query: SIEM correlation: persistence activity consistent with vSphere Installation Bundles
Matching passage: T1505.006 vSphere Installation Bundles. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may abuse vSphere Installation Bundles (VIBs) to establish persistent access to ESXi hypervisors. VIBs are collections of files used for software distribution and virtual system management in VMware environments. Since ESXi uses an in-memory filesystem where changes made to most files are stored in RAM rather than in persistent storage, these modifications are lost after a reboot. However, VIBs can be used to create startup tasks, apply custom firewall rules, or deploy binaries that persist across reboots. Typically, administrators use VIBs for updates and system maintenance. VIBs can be broken down into three components:(Citation: VMware VIBs) * VIB payload: a `.vgz` archive containing the directories and files to be created and executed on boot when the VIBs are loaded. * Signature file: verifies the host acceptance level of a VIB, indicating what testing and validation has been done by VMware or its partners before publication of a VIB. By default, ESXi hosts require a minimum acceptance level of PartnerSupported for VIB installation, meaning the VIB is published by a trusted VMware partner. However, privileged users can change the default acceptance level using the `esxcli` command line interface. Additionally, VIBs are able to be installed regardless of acceptance level by using the <code> esxcli software vib install --force</code> command. * XML descriptor file: a configuration file containing associated VIB metadata, such as the name of the VIB and its dependencies. Adversaries may leverage malicious VIB packages to maintain persistent access to ESXi hypervisors, allowing system changes to be executed upon each bootup of ESXi – such as using `esxcli` to enable firewall rules for backdoor traffic, creating listeners on hard coded ports, and executing backdoors.(Citation: Google Cloud Threat Intelligence ESXi VIBs 2022) Adversaries may also masquerade their malicious VIB files as PartnerSupported by modifying the XML descriptor file.(Citation: Googl
Near-miss passage: T1505 Server Software Component. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may abuse legitimate extensible development features of servers to establish persistent access to systems. Enterprise server applications may include features that allow developers to write and install software or scripts to extend the functionality of the main application. Adversaries may install malicious components to extend and abuse server applications.(Citation: volexity_0day_sophos_FW)
Query: exploit Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Process Portal in IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) 8.0 through 8.0.1.3, 8.5.0 through 8.5.0.1, and 8.5.5 through 8.5.5.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0103. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 3.5. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Process Portal in IBM Business Process Manager (BPM) 8.0 through 8.0.1.3, 8.5.0 through 8.5.0.1, and 8.5.5 through 8.5.5.0 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified data fields.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1879. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Google Doc Embedder plugin before 2.5.19 for WordPress allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the profile parameter in an edit action in the gde-settings page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
Query: exploit Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google V8 before 3.30.33.15, as used in Google Chrome before 40.0.2214.91, allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have oth
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1346. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google V8 before 3.30.33.15, as used in Google Chrome before 40.0.2214.91, allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have other impact via unknown vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1993. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.0. IBM Security QRadar Incident Forensics 7.2.x before 7.2.5 Patch 5 does not set the secure flag for unspecified cookies in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture these cookies by intercepting their transmission within an http session.