alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: threat report mentioning Gather Victim Identity Information
Matching passage: T1589 Gather Victim Identity Information. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may gather information about the victim's identity that can be used during targeting. Information about identities may include a variety of details, including personal data (ex: employee names, email addresses, security question responses, etc.) as well as sensitive details such as credentials or multi-factor authentication (MFA) configurations. Adversaries may gather this information in various ways, such as direct elicitation via [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598). Information about users could also be enumerated via other active means (i.e. [Active Scanning](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1595)) such as probing and analyzing responses from authentication services that may reveal valid usernames in a system or permitted MFA /methods associated with those usernames.(Citation: GrimBlog UsernameEnum)(Citation: Obsidian SSPR Abuse 2023) Information about victims may also be exposed to adversaries via online or other accessible data sets (ex: [Social Media](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593/001) or [Search Victim-Owned Websites](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1594)).(Citation: OPM Leak)(Citation: Register Deloitte)(Citation: Register Uber)(Citation: Detectify Slack Tokens)(Citation: Forbes GitHub Creds)(Citation: GitHub truffleHog)(Citation: GitHub Gitrob)(Citation: CNET Leaks) Gathering this information may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593) or [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Compromise Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1586)), and/or initial access (ex: [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) or [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078)).
Near-miss passage: T1589.003 Employee Names. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may gather employee names that can be used during targeting. Employee names be used to derive email addresses as well as to help guide other reconnaissance efforts and/or craft more-believable lures. Adversaries may easily gather employee names, since they may be readily available and exposed via online or other accessible data sets (ex: [Social Media](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593/001) or [Search Victim-Owned Websites](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1594)).(Citation: OPM Leak) Gathering this information may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593) or [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Compromise Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1586)), and/or initial access (ex: [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) or [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078)).
Query: Sigma rule for Detects potential sideloading of "mpclient.dll" by Windows Defender processes ("MpCmdRun" and "NisSrv") from their non-d
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential sideloading of "mpclient.dll" by Windows Defender processes ("MpCmdRun" and "NisSrv") from their non-d. Logsource: windows / image_load. Rule: title: Potential Mpclient.DLL Sideloading id: 418dc89a-9808-4b87-b1d7-e5ae0cb6effc related: - id: 7002aa10-b8d4-47ae-b5ba-51ab07e228b9 type: similar status: test description: Detects potential sideloading of "mpclient.dll" by Windows Defender processes ("MpCmdRun" and "NisSrv") from their non-default directory. references: - https://www.sentinelone.com/blog/living-off-windows-defender-lockbit-ransomware-sideloads-cobalt-strike-through-microsoft-security-tool author: Bhabesh Raj date: 2022-08-02 modified: 2023-08-04 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.persistence - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1574.001 logsource: product: windows category: image_load detection: selection: ImageLoaded|endswith: \mpclient.dll Image|endswith: - \MpCmdRun.exe - \NisSrv.exe filter_main_known_locations: Image|startswith: - C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Defender\ - C:\Program Files\Microsoft Security Client\ - C:\Program Files\Windows Defender\ - C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Defender\Platform\ - C:\Windows\WinSxS\ condition: selection and not 1 of filter_main_* falsepositives: - Unlikely level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detect use of the Windows 8.3 short name. Which could be used as a method to avoid Image based detection. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Use NTFS Short Name in Image id: 3ef5605c-9eb9-47b0-9a71-b727e6aa5c3b related: - id: dd6b39d9-d9be-4a3b-8fe0-fe3c6a5c1795 type: similar status: test description: Detect use of the Windows 8.3 short name. Which could be used as a method to avoid Image based detection references: - https://www.acunetix.com/blog/articles/windows-short-8-3-filenames-web-security-problem/ - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-2000-server/cc959352(v=technet.10) - https://twitter.com/jonasLyk/status/1555914501802921984 author: frack113, Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-08-06 modified: 2023-07-20 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1564.004 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: Image|contains: - ~1.bat - ~1.dll - ~1.exe - ~1.hta - ~1.js - ~1.msi - ~1.ps1 - ~1.tmp - ~1.vbe - ~1.vbs - ~2.bat - ~2.dll - ~2.exe - ~2.hta - ~2.js - ~2.msi - ~2.ps1 - ~2.tmp - ~2.vbe - ~2.vbs filter_main_generic_parent: ParentImage: C:\Windows\explorer.exe filter_optional_webex: ParentImage|endswith: \WebEx\WebexHost.exe filter_optional_thor: ParentImage|endswith: \thor\thor64.exe filter_optional_winzip: Image: C:\PROGRA~1\WinZip\WZPREL~1.EXE filter_optional_vcred: Image|endswith: \VCREDI~1.EXE condition: selection and not 1 of filter_main_* and not 1 of filter_optional_* falsepositives: - Software Installers level: medium
Query: describe CVE-2015-6604
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6604. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. libstagefright in Android before 5.1.1 LMY48T allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted media file, aka internal bug 23129786.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7292. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Stack-based buffer overflow in the havok_write function in drivers/staging/havok/havok.c in Amazon Fire OS before 2016-01-15 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (panic) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string to /dev/hv.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-1776
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1776. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 6.199999809265137. Apache Hadoop 2.6.x encrypts intermediate data generated by a MapReduce job and stores it along with the encryption key in a credentials file on disk when the Intermediate data encryption feature is enabled, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the file.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5827. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. WebKit in Apple iOS before 9 allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy and obtain an object reference via vectors involving a (1) custom event, (2) message event, or (3) pop state event.
Query: rule covering Detects exploitation attempt using the JNDI-Exploit-Kit
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects exploitation attempt using the JNDI-Exploit-Kit. Logsource: webserver. Rule: title: JNDIExploit Pattern id: 412d55bc-7737-4d25-9542-5b396867ce55 status: test description: Detects exploitation attempt using the JNDI-Exploit-Kit references: - https://github.com/pimps/JNDI-Exploit-Kit - https://web.archive.org/web/20231015205935/https://githubmemory.com/repo/FunctFan/JNDIExploit author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-12-12 modified: 2022-12-25 tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1190 logsource: category: webserver detection: keywords: - /Basic/Command/Base64/ - /Basic/ReverseShell/ - /Basic/TomcatMemshell - /Basic/JettyMemshell - /Basic/WeblogicMemshell - /Basic/JBossMemshell - /Basic/WebsphereMemshell - /Basic/SpringMemshell - /Deserialization/URLDNS/ - /Deserialization/CommonsCollections1/Dnslog/ - /Deserialization/CommonsCollections2/Command/Base64/ - /Deserialization/CommonsBeanutils1/ReverseShell/ - /Deserialization/Jre8u20/TomcatMemshell - /TomcatBypass/Dnslog/ - /TomcatBypass/Command/ - /TomcatBypass/ReverseShell/ - /TomcatBypass/TomcatMemshell - /TomcatBypass/SpringMemshell - /GroovyBypass/Command/ - /WebsphereBypass/Upload/ condition: keywords falsepositives: - Legitimate apps the use these paths level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects known malicious service installation that appear in cases in which a Sliver implants execute the PsExec commands. Logsource: windows / system. Rule: title: Sliver C2 Default Service Installation id: 31c51af6-e7aa-4da7-84d4-8f32cc580af2 status: test description: Detects known malicious service installation that appear in cases in which a Sliver implants execute the PsExec commands references: - https://github.com/BishopFox/sliver/blob/79f2d48fcdfc2bee4713b78d431ea4b27f733f30/client/command/commands.go#L1231 - https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2022/08/24/looking-for-the-sliver-lining-hunting-for-emerging-command-and-control-frameworks/ author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems), Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-08-25 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.execution - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.t1543.003 - attack.t1569.002 logsource: product: windows service: system detection: selection_eid: Provider_Name: Service Control Manager EventID: 7045 selection_service_1: ImagePath|re: ^[a-zA-Z]:\\windows\\temp\\[a-zA-Z0-9]{10}\.exe selection_service_2: ServiceName: - Sliver - Sliver implant condition: selection_eid and 1 of selection_service_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-9097
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9097. CWE: CWE-93. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. The mail gem before 2.5.5 for Ruby (aka A Really Ruby Mail Library) is vulnerable to SMTP command injection via CRLF sequences in a RCPT TO or MAIL FROM command, as demonstrated by CRLF sequences immediately before and after a DATA substring.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9096. CWE: CWE-93. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Net::SMTP in Ruby before 2.4.0 is vulnerable to SMTP command injection via CRLF sequences in a RCPT TO or MAIL FROM command, as demonstrated by CRLF sequences immediately before and after a DATA substring.
Query: exploit Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Magento Community Edition (CE) 1.9.1.0 and Enterprise Edition (EE) 1.14.1.0 allow remote authenticated users to include and execute 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1398. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 6.5. Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Magento Community Edition (CE) 1.9.1.0 and Enterprise Edition (EE) 1.14.1.0 allow remote authenticated users to include and execute certain PHP files via (1) .. (dot dot) sequences in the PATH_INFO to index.php or (2) vectors involving a block value in the ___directive parameter to the Cms_Wysiwyg controller in the Adminhtml module, related to the blockDirective function and the auto loading mechanism. NOTE: vector 2 might not cross privilege boundaries, since administrators might already have the privileges to execute code and upload files.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1395. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 7.5. Directory traversal vulnerability in GNU patch versions which support Git-style patching before 2.7.3 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files with the permissions of the target user via a .. (dot dot) in a diff file name.
Query: how to detect Botnet
Matching passage: T1584.005 Botnet. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise numerous third-party systems to form a botnet that can be used during targeting. A botnet is a network of compromised systems that can be instructed to perform coordinated tasks.(Citation: Norton Botnet) Instead of purchasing/renting a botnet from a booter/stresser service, adversaries may build their own botnet by compromising numerous third-party systems.(Citation: Imperva DDoS for Hire) Adversaries may also conduct a takeover of an existing botnet, such as redirecting bots to adversary-controlled C2 servers.(Citation: Dell Dridex Oct 2015) With a botnet at their disposal, adversaries may perform follow-on activity such as large-scale [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) or Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS).
Near-miss passage: T1584.008 Network Devices. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise third-party network devices that can be used during targeting. Network devices, such as small office/home office (SOHO) routers, may be compromised where the adversary's ultimate goal is not [Initial Access](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0001) to that environment, but rather to leverage these devices to support additional targeting. Once an adversary has control, compromised network devices can be used to launch additional operations, such as hosting payloads for [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) campaigns (i.e., [Link Target](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1608/005)) or enabling the required access to execute [Content Injection](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1659) operations. Adversaries may also be able to harvest reusable credentials (i.e., [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078)) from compromised network devices. Adversaries often target Internet-facing edge devices and related network appliances that specifically do not support robust host-based defenses.(Citation: Mandiant Fortinet Zero Day)(Citation: Wired Russia Cyberwar) Compromised network devices may be used to support subsequent [Command and Control](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0011) activity, such as [Hide Infrastructure](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1665) through an established [Proxy](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1090) and/or [Botnet](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1584/005) network.(Citation: Justice GRU 2024)
Query: intelligence brief on T1027.011
Matching passage: T1027.011 Fileless Storage. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may store data in "fileless" formats to conceal malicious activity from defenses. Fileless storage can be broadly defined as any format other than a file. Common examples of non-volatile fileless storage in Windows systems include the Windows Registry, event logs, or WMI repository.(Citation: Microsoft Fileless)(Citation: SecureList Fileless) Shared memory directories on Linux systems (`/dev/shm`, `/run/shm`, `/var/run`, and `/var/lock`) and volatile directories on Network Devices (`/tmp` and `/volatile`) may also be considered fileless storage, as files written to these directories are mapped directly to RAM and not stored on the disk.(Citation: Elastic Binary Executed from Shared Memory Directory)(Citation: Akami Frog4Shell 2024)(Citation: Aquasec Muhstik Malware 2024)(Citation: Bitsight 7777 Botnet)(Citation: CISCO Nexus 900 Config). Similar to fileless in-memory behaviors such as [Reflective Code Loading](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1620) and [Process Injection](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1055), fileless data storage may remain undetected by antivirus and other endpoint security tools that can only access specific file formats from disk storage. Leveraging fileless storage may also allow adversaries to bypass the protections offered by read-only file systems in Linux.(Citation: Sysdig Fileless Malware 23022) Adversaries may use fileless storage to conceal various types of stored data, including payloads/shellcode (potentially being used as part of [Persistence](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003)) and collected data not yet exfiltrated from the victim (e.g., [Local Data Staging](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1074/001)). Adversaries also often encrypt, encode, splice, or otherwise obfuscate this fileless data when stored. Some forms of fileless storage activity may indirectly create artifacts in the file system, but in central and otherwise difficult to inspect formats such as the WMI (e.g., `%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem\R
Near-miss passage: T1027.004 Compile After Delivery. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may attempt to make payloads difficult to discover and analyze by delivering files to victims as uncompiled code. Text-based source code files may subvert analysis and scrutiny from protections targeting executables/binaries. These payloads will need to be compiled before execution; typically via native utilities such as ilasm.exe(Citation: ATTACK IQ), csc.exe, or GCC/MinGW.(Citation: ClearSky MuddyWater Nov 2018) Source code payloads may also be encrypted, encoded, and/or embedded within other files, such as those delivered as a [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566). Payloads may also be delivered in formats unrecognizable and inherently benign to the native OS (ex: EXEs on macOS/Linux) before later being (re)compiled into a proper executable binary with a bundled compiler and execution framework.(Citation: TrendMicro WindowsAppMac)
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-3764
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3764. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Notification Center in Apple OS X before 10.10.5 does not properly remove dismissed notifications, which allows attackers to read arbitrary notifications via a crafted app.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6096. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The XML DTD parser in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, 4.5, 4.5.1, 4.5.2, and 4.6 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue, aka ".NET Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-9114
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9114. CWE: CWE-476. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile and Snapdragon Mobile SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 820, and SD 820A, lack of address argument validation in qsee_query_counter syscall could lead to untrusted pointer dereference.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9072. CWE: CWE-476. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, an untrusted pointer dereference can occur in a TrustZone syscall.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-8965
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8965. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Rogue Wave JViews before 8.8 patch 21 and 8.9 before patch 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code that exists in the classpath, such as test code or administration code. The issue exists because the ilog.views.faces.IlvFacesController servlet in jviews-framework-all.jar does not require explicit configuration of servlets that can be called.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5897. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 4.599999904632568. The Address Book framework in Apple OS X before 10.11 allows local users to gain privileges by using an environment variable to inject code into processes that rely on this framework.
Query: vulnerability: In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, a NULL pointer may be dereferenced in the front end.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9038. CWE: CWE-476. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, a NULL pointer may be dereferenced in the front end.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9100. CWE: CWE-476. CVSS: 5.5. The fill_buffer_resample function in util.c in libmp3lame.a in LAME 3.99.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted audio file.
Query: detect Detects function calls from the EditionUpgradeManager COM interface. Which is an interface that is not used by standard in logs
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects function calls from the EditionUpgradeManager COM interface. Which is an interface that is not used by standard. Logsource: windows / process_access. Rule: title: Function Call From Undocumented COM Interface EditionUpgradeManager id: fb3722e4-1a06-46b6-b772-253e2e7db933 status: test description: Detects function calls from the EditionUpgradeManager COM interface. Which is an interface that is not used by standard executables. references: - https://www.snip2code.com/Snippet/4397378/UAC-bypass-using-EditionUpgradeManager-C/ - https://gist.github.com/hfiref0x/de9c83966623236f5ebf8d9ae2407611 author: oscd.community, Dmitry Uchakin date: 2020-10-07 modified: 2023-11-30 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.t1548.002 logsource: category: process_access product: windows detection: selection: CallTrace|contains: editionupgrademanagerobj.dll condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the process injection of a LittleCorporal generated Maldoc.. Logsource: windows / process_access. Rule: title: HackTool - LittleCorporal Generated Maldoc Injection id: 7bdde3bf-2a42-4c39-aa31-a92b3e17afac status: test description: Detects the process injection of a LittleCorporal generated Maldoc. references: - https://github.com/connormcgarr/LittleCorporal author: Christian Burkard (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-08-09 modified: 2023-11-28 tags: - attack.execution - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth - attack.t1204.002 - attack.t1055.003 logsource: category: process_access product: windows detection: selection: SourceImage|endswith: \winword.exe CallTrace|contains|all: - :\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v2. - UNKNOWN condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: risk of PCRE before 8.36 mishandles the /((?(R)a|(?1)))+/ pattern and related patterns with certain recursion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation faul
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2328. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 7.5. PCRE before 8.36 mishandles the /((?(R)a|(?1)))+/ pattern and related patterns with certain recursion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7575. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 5.900000095367432. Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.20.2, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 43.0.2 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.5.2, does not reject MD5 signatures in Server Key Exchange messages in TLS 1.2 Handshake Protocol traffic, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers by triggering a collision.
Query: describe CVE-2015-7776
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7776. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cybozu Garoon 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.0 does not properly restrict loading of IMG elements, which makes it easier for remote attackers to track users via a crafted HTML e-mail message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-1196.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2855. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The WebUI component in Blue Coat SSL Visibility Appliance SV800, SV1800, SV2800, and SV3800 3.6.x through 3.8.x before 3.8.4 does not set the secure flag for the administrator's cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4138.