alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: rule covering Indicates user activity that is unusual for the user or consistent with known attack patterns.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Indicates user activity that is unusual for the user or consistent with known attack patterns.. Logsource: azure / riskdetection. Rule: title: Azure AD Threat Intelligence id: a2cb56ff-4f46-437a-a0fa-ffa4d1303cba status: test description: Indicates user activity that is unusual for the user or consistent with known attack patterns. references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/id-protection/concept-identity-protection-risks#azure-ad-threat-intelligence-sign-in - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/id-protection/concept-identity-protection-risks#azure-ad-threat-intelligence-user - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/architecture/security-operations-user-accounts#unusual-sign-ins author: Mark Morowczynski '@markmorow', Gloria Lee, '@gleeiamglo' date: 2023-09-07 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1078 - attack.persistence - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.initial-access logsource: product: azure service: riskdetection detection: selection: riskEventType: investigationsThreatIntelligence condition: selection falsepositives: - We recommend investigating the sessions flagged by this detection in the context of other sign-ins from the user. level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects RemCom service installation and execution events. Logsource: windows / system. Rule: title: RemCom Service Installation id: 9e36ed87-4986-482e-8e3b-5c23ffff11bf status: test description: Detects RemCom service installation and execution events references: - https://github.com/kavika13/RemCom/ author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-08-07 tags: - attack.execution - attack.t1569.002 logsource: product: windows service: system detection: selection_eid: Provider_Name: Service Control Manager EventID: 7045 selection_service: - ServiceName: RemComSvc - ImagePath|endswith: \RemComSvc.exe condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Query: risk of Cloudera Manager 4.x, 5.0.x before 5.0.6, 5.1.x before 5.1.5, 5.2.x before 5.2.5, and 5.3.x before 5.3.3 uses global read permissions for files in its configuration directory when 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2263. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 3.299999952316284. Cloudera Manager 4.x, 5.0.x before 5.0.6, 5.1.x before 5.1.5, 5.2.x before 5.2.5, and 5.3.x before 5.3.3 uses global read permissions for files in its configuration directory when starting YARN NodeManager, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the files, as demonstrated by yarn.keytab or ssl-server.xml in /var/run/cloudera-scm-agent/process.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2828. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 9.0. CA Spectrum 9.2.x and 9.3.x before 9.3 H02 does not properly validate serialized Java objects, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain administrative privileges via crafted object data.
Query: vulnerability: Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u25 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to the installation process.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0421. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 6.900000095367432. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u25 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to the installation process.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2590. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45, and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4732.
Query: describe CVE-2015-5134
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5134. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.232 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.508 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.199, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.199, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 18.0.0.199 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5127, CVE-2015-5130, CVE-2015-5539, CVE-2015-5540, CVE-2015-5550, CVE-2015-5551, CVE-2015-5556, CVE-2015-5557, CVE-2015-5559, CVE-2015-5561, CVE-2015-5563, CVE-2015-5564, and CVE-2015-5565.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8447. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Use-after-free vulnerability in the Color object implementation in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted setTransform arguments, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, and CVE-2015-8454.
Query: vulnerability: Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Honeywell Tuxedo Touch before 5.2.19.0_VA allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests as
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2848. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Honeywell Tuxedo Touch before 5.2.19.0_VA allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests associated with home-automation commands, as demonstrated by a door-unlock command.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5338. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the lesson module in Moodle through 2.6.11, 2.7.x before 2.7.11, 2.8.x before 2.8.9, and 2.9.x before 2.9.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to (1) mod/lesson/mediafile.php or (2) mod/lesson/view.php.
Query: SOC alert related to Internal Defacement
Matching passage: T1491.001 Internal Defacement. Tactics: impact. Description: An adversary may deface systems internal to an organization in an attempt to intimidate or mislead users, thus discrediting the integrity of the systems. This may take the form of modifications to internal websites or server login messages, or directly to user systems with the replacement of the desktop wallpaper.(Citation: Novetta Blockbuster)(Citation: Varonis) Disturbing or offensive images may be used as a part of [Internal Defacement](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1491/001) in order to cause user discomfort, or to pressure compliance with accompanying messages. Since internally defacing systems exposes an adversary's presence, it often takes place after other intrusion goals have been accomplished.(Citation: Novetta Blockbuster Destructive Malware)
Near-miss passage: T1491.002 External Defacement. Tactics: impact. Description: An adversary may deface systems external to an organization in an attempt to deliver messaging, intimidate, or otherwise mislead an organization or users. [External Defacement](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1491/002) may ultimately cause users to distrust the systems and to question/discredit the system’s integrity. Externally-facing websites are a common victim of defacement; often targeted by adversary and hacktivist groups in order to push a political message or spread propaganda.(Citation: FireEye Cyber Threats to Media Industries)(Citation: Kevin Mandia Statement to US Senate Committee on Intelligence)(Citation: Anonymous Hackers Deface Russian Govt Site) [External Defacement](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1491/002) may be used as a catalyst to trigger events, or as a response to actions taken by an organization or government. Similarly, website defacement may also be used as setup, or a precursor, for future attacks such as [Drive-by Compromise](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1189).(Citation: Trend Micro Deep Dive Into Defacement)
Query: detection engineering for Screensaver
Matching passage: T1546.002 Screensaver. Tactics: privilege escalation, persistence. Description: Adversaries may establish persistence by executing malicious content triggered by user inactivity. Screensavers are programs that execute after a configurable time of user inactivity and consist of Portable Executable (PE) files with a .scr file extension.(Citation: Wikipedia Screensaver) The Windows screensaver application scrnsave.scr is located in <code>C:\Windows\System32\</code>, and <code>C:\Windows\sysWOW64\</code> on 64-bit Windows systems, along with screensavers included with base Windows installations. The following screensaver settings are stored in the Registry (<code>HKCU\Control Panel\Desktop\</code>) and could be manipulated to achieve persistence: * <code>SCRNSAVE.exe</code> - set to malicious PE path * <code>ScreenSaveActive</code> - set to '1' to enable the screensaver * <code>ScreenSaverIsSecure</code> - set to '0' to not require a password to unlock * <code>ScreenSaveTimeout</code> - sets user inactivity timeout before screensaver is executed Adversaries can use screensaver settings to maintain persistence by setting the screensaver to run malware after a certain timeframe of user inactivity.(Citation: ESET Gazer Aug 2017)
Near-miss passage: T1546.006 LC_LOAD_DYLIB Addition. Tactics: privilege escalation, persistence. Description: Adversaries may establish persistence by executing malicious content triggered by the execution of tainted binaries. Mach-O binaries have a series of headers that are used to perform certain operations when a binary is loaded. The LC_LOAD_DYLIB header in a Mach-O binary tells macOS and OS X which dynamic libraries (dylibs) to load during execution time. These can be added ad-hoc to the compiled binary as long as adjustments are made to the rest of the fields and dependencies.(Citation: Writing Bad Malware for OSX) There are tools available to perform these changes. Adversaries may modify Mach-O binary headers to load and execute malicious dylibs every time the binary is executed. Although any changes will invalidate digital signatures on binaries because the binary is being modified, this can be remediated by simply removing the LC_CODE_SIGNATURE command from the binary so that the signature isn’t checked at load time.(Citation: Malware Persistence on OS X)
Query: risk of Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jsoup before 1.8.3.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6748. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jsoup before 1.8.3.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5592. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Incomplete blacklist in sanitize_string in Zenphoto before 1.4.9 allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
Query: Outbound C2 pattern associated with Compile After Delivery
Matching passage: T1027.004 Compile After Delivery. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may attempt to make payloads difficult to discover and analyze by delivering files to victims as uncompiled code. Text-based source code files may subvert analysis and scrutiny from protections targeting executables/binaries. These payloads will need to be compiled before execution; typically via native utilities such as ilasm.exe(Citation: ATTACK IQ), csc.exe, or GCC/MinGW.(Citation: ClearSky MuddyWater Nov 2018) Source code payloads may also be encrypted, encoded, and/or embedded within other files, such as those delivered as a [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566). Payloads may also be delivered in formats unrecognizable and inherently benign to the native OS (ex: EXEs on macOS/Linux) before later being (re)compiled into a proper executable binary with a bundled compiler and execution framework.(Citation: TrendMicro WindowsAppMac)
Near-miss passage: T1027 Obfuscated Files or Information. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may attempt to make an executable or file difficult to discover or analyze by encrypting, encoding, or otherwise obfuscating its contents on the system or in transit. This is common behavior that can be used across different platforms and the network to evade defenses. Payloads may be compressed, archived, or encrypted in order to avoid detection. These payloads may be used during Initial Access or later to mitigate detection. Sometimes a user's action may be required to open and [Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1140) for [User Execution](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1204). The user may also be required to input a password to open a password protected compressed/encrypted file that was provided by the adversary.(Citation: Volexity PowerDuke November 2016) Adversaries may also use compressed or archived scripts, such as JavaScript. Portions of files can also be encoded to hide the plain-text strings that would otherwise help defenders with discovery.(Citation: Linux/Cdorked.A We Live Security Analysis) Payloads may also be split into separate, seemingly benign files that only reveal malicious functionality when reassembled.(Citation: Carbon Black Obfuscation Sept 2016) Adversaries may also abuse [Command Obfuscation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1027/010) to obscure commands executed from payloads or directly via [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059). Environment variables, aliases, characters, and other platform/language specific semantics can be used to evade signature based detections and application control mechanisms.(Citation: FireEye Obfuscation June 2017)(Citation: FireEye Revoke-Obfuscation July 2017)(Citation: PaloAlto EncodedCommand March 2017)
Query: vulnerability: The uuencode inspection engine in Cisco AsyncOS on Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) devices 8.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass intended content restrictions via 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0605. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The uuencode inspection engine in Cisco AsyncOS on Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) devices 8.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass intended content restrictions via a crafted e-mail attachment with uuencode encoding, aka Bug ID CSCzv54343.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7809. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. The displayBlock function Template.php in Sensio Labs Twig before 1.20.0, when Sandbox mode is enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the _self variable in a template.
Query: vulnerability: fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c in the NFS client in the Linux kernel before 4.2.2 does not properly initialize memory for migration recovery operations, which allows remote NFS servers to cause
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8746. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c in the NFS client in the Linux kernel before 4.2.2 does not properly initialize memory for migration recovery operations, which allows remote NFS servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and panic) via crafted network traffic.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0457. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.0. Unspecified vulnerability in the Java VM component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2629.
Query: detect Detects connections to interplanetary file system (IPFS) containing a user's email address which mirrors behaviours obse in logs
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects connections to interplanetary file system (IPFS) containing a user's email address which mirrors behaviours obse. Logsource: proxy. Rule: title: Suspicious Network Communication With IPFS id: eb6c2004-1cef-427f-8885-9042974e5eb6 status: test description: Detects connections to interplanetary file system (IPFS) containing a user's email address which mirrors behaviours observed in recent phishing campaigns leveraging IPFS to host credential harvesting webpages. references: - https://blog.talosintelligence.com/ipfs-abuse/ - https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/IOCs/tree/80caca039988252fbb3f27a2e89c2f2917f582e0/2022/11 - https://isc.sans.edu/diary/IPFS%20phishing%20and%20the%20need%20for%20correctly%20set%20HTTP%20security%20headers/29638 author: Gavin Knapp date: 2023-03-16 tags: - attack.collection - attack.credential-access - attack.t1056 logsource: category: proxy detection: selection: cs-uri|re: (?i)(ipfs\.io/|ipfs\.io\s).+\..+@.+\.[a-z]+ condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate use of IPFS being used in the organisation. However the cs-uri regex looking for a user email will likely negate this. level: low
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detect use of PDQ Deploy remote admin tool. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: PDQ Deploy Remote Adminstartion Tool Execution id: d679950c-abb7-43a6-80fb-2a480c4fc450 related: - id: 12b8e9f5-96b2-41e1-9a42-8c6779a5c184 type: similar status: test description: Detect use of PDQ Deploy remote admin tool references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/9e5b12c4912c07562aec7500447b11fa3e17e254/atomics/T1072/T1072.md - https://www.pdq.com/pdq-deploy/ author: frack113 date: 2022-10-01 modified: 2023-01-30 tags: - attack.execution - attack.lateral-movement - attack.t1072 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: - Description: PDQ Deploy Console - Product: PDQ Deploy - Company: PDQ.com - OriginalFileName: PDQDeployConsole.exe condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate use level: medium
Query: detection engineering for Asymmetric Cryptography
Matching passage: T1573.002 Asymmetric Cryptography. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may employ a known asymmetric encryption algorithm to conceal command and control traffic rather than relying on any inherent protections provided by a communication protocol. Asymmetric cryptography, also known as public key cryptography, uses a keypair per party: one public that can be freely distributed, and one private. Due to how the keys are generated, the sender encrypts data with the receiver’s public key and the receiver decrypts the data with their private key. This ensures that only the intended recipient can read the encrypted data. Common public key encryption algorithms include RSA and ElGamal. For efficiency, many protocols (including SSL/TLS) use symmetric cryptography once a connection is established, but use asymmetric cryptography to establish or transmit a key. As such, these protocols are classified as [Asymmetric Cryptography](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1573/002).
Near-miss passage: T1573 Encrypted Channel. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may employ an encryption algorithm to conceal command and control traffic rather than relying on any inherent protections provided by a communication protocol. Despite the use of a secure algorithm, these implementations may be vulnerable to reverse engineering if secret keys are encoded and/or generated within malware samples/configuration files.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-3448
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3448. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. REST client for Ruby (aka rest-client) before 1.7.3 logs usernames and passwords, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the log.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3030. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.0. The web interface in McAfee Advanced Threat Defense (MATD) before 3.4.4.63 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive configuration information via unspecified vectors.
Query: write Sigma for Detects adversary creating screen capture of a full with xwd. Highly recommended using rule on servers, due high usage o
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects adversary creating screen capture of a full with xwd. Highly recommended using rule on servers, due high usage o. Logsource: linux / auditd. Rule: title: Screen Capture with Xwd id: e2f17c5d-b02a-442b-9052-6eb89c9fec9c status: test description: Detects adversary creating screen capture of a full with xwd. Highly recommended using rule on servers, due high usage of screenshot utilities on user workstations references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1113/T1113.md#atomic-test-3---x-windows-capture - https://linux.die.net/man/1/xwd author: Pawel Mazur date: 2021-09-13 modified: 2022-12-18 tags: - attack.collection - attack.t1113 logsource: product: linux service: auditd detection: selection: type: EXECVE a0: xwd xwd_root_window: a1: -root a2: -out a3|endswith: .xwd xwd_no_root_window: a1: -out a2|endswith: .xwd condition: selection and 1 of xwd_* falsepositives: - Legitimate use of screenshot utility level: low
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects a potential remote threat creation with certain characteristics which are typical for Cobalt Strike beacons. Logsource: windows / create_remote_thread. Rule: title: HackTool - Potential CobaltStrike Process Injection id: 6309645e-122d-4c5b-bb2b-22e4f9c2fa42 status: test description: Detects a potential remote threat creation with certain characteristics which are typical for Cobalt Strike beacons references: - https://medium.com/@olafhartong/cobalt-strike-remote-threads-detection-206372d11d0f - https://blog.cobaltstrike.com/2018/04/09/cobalt-strike-3-11-the-snake-that-eats-its-tail/ author: Olaf Hartong, Florian Roth (Nextron Systems), Aleksey Potapov, oscd.community date: 2018-11-30 modified: 2023-05-05 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth - attack.t1055.001 logsource: product: windows category: create_remote_thread detection: selection: StartAddress|endswith: - 0B80 - 0C7C - 0C88 condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: describe CVE-2015-0984
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0984. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 10.0. Directory traversal vulnerability in the FTP server on Honeywell Excel Web XL1000C50 52 I/O, XL1000C100 104 I/O, XL1000C500 300 I/O, XL1000C1000 600 I/O, XL1000C50U 52 I/O UUKL, XL1000C100U 104 I/O UUKL, XL1000C500U 300 I/O UUKL, and XL1000C1000U 600 I/O UUKL controllers before 2.04.01 allows remote attackers to read files under the web root, and consequently obtain administrative login access, via a crafted pathname.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6500. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 7.5. Directory traversal vulnerability in ownCloud Server before 8.0.6 and 8.1.x before 8.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to list directory contents and possibly cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a .. (dot dot) in the dir parameter to index.php/apps/files/ajax/scan.php.
Query: exploit The Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) daemon in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (locked CAPWA
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1452. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. The Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) daemon in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (locked CAPWAP Access Controller) via a large number of ClientHello DTLS messages.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1233. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 7.5. Google Chrome before 41.0.2272.118 does not properly handle the interaction of IPC, the Gamepad API, and Google V8, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.