alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: actor TTPs: Hypervisor CLI
Matching passage: T1059.012 Hypervisor CLI. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse hypervisor command line interpreters (CLIs) to execute malicious commands. Hypervisor CLIs typically enable a wide variety of functionality for managing both the hypervisor itself and the guest virtual machines it hosts. For example, on ESXi systems, tools such as `esxcli` and `vim-cmd` allow administrators to configure firewall rules and log forwarding on the hypervisor, list virtual machines, start and stop virtual machines, and more.(Citation: Broadcom ESXCLI Reference)(Citation: Crowdstrike Hypervisor Jackpotting Pt 2 2021)(Citation: LOLESXi) Adversaries may be able to leverage these tools in order to support further actions, such as [File and Directory Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1083) or [Data Encrypted for Impact](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1486).
Near-miss passage: T1059.013 Container CLI/API. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse built-in CLI tools or API calls to execute malicious commands in containerized environments. The Docker CLI is used for managing containers via an exposed API point from the `dockerd` daemon. Some common examples of Docker CLI include Docker Desktop CLI and Docker Compose, but users are also able to use SDKs to interact with the API. For example, Docker SDK for Python can be used to run commands within a Python application.(Citation: Docker Desktop CLI) Adversaries may leverage the Docker CLI, API, or SDK to pull or build Docker images (i.e., [Ingress Tool Transfer](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1105), [Build Image on Host](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1612)), run containers (i.e., [Deploy Container](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1610)), or execute commands inside running containers (i.e., [Container Administration Command](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1609)). In some cases, threat actors may pull legitimate images that include scripts or tools that they can leverage - for example, using an image that includes the `curl` command to download payloads.(Citation: Intezer) Adversaries may also utilize `docker inspect` and `docker ps` to scan for cloud environment variables and other running containers (i.e., [Container and Resource Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1613)).(Citation: Cisco Talos Blog)(Citation: aquasec) Kubernetes is responsible for the management and orchestration of containers across clusters. The Kubernetes control plane, which manages the state of the cluster and is responsible for scheduling, communication, and resource monitoring, can be invoked directly via the API or indirectly via CLI tools such as `kubectl`. It may also be accessed within client libraries such as Go or Python. By utilizing the API, administrators can interact with resources within the cluster such as listing or creating pods, which is a group of one or more containers. Adversaries call the API server via `curl` o
Query: describe CVE-2015-4363
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4363. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.800000190734863. Open redirect vulnerability in the finder_form_goto function in the Finder module for Drupal allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8435. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, and CVE-2015-8454.
Query: detect Password Policy Discovery
Matching passage: T1201 Password Policy Discovery. Tactics: discovery. Description: Adversaries may attempt to access detailed information about the password policy used within an enterprise network or cloud environment. Password policies are a way to enforce complex passwords that are difficult to guess or crack through [Brute Force](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110). This information may help the adversary to create a list of common passwords and launch dictionary and/or brute force attacks which adheres to the policy (e.g. if the minimum password length should be 8, then not trying passwords such as 'pass123'; not checking for more than 3-4 passwords per account if the lockout is set to 6 as to not lock out accounts). Password policies can be set and discovered on Windows, Linux, and macOS systems via various command shell utilities such as <code>net accounts (/domain)</code>, <code>Get-ADDefaultDomainPasswordPolicy</code>, <code>chage -l <username></code>, <code>cat /etc/pam.d/common-password</code>, and <code>pwpolicy getaccountpolicies</code> (Citation: Superuser Linux Password Policies) (Citation: Jamf User Password Policies). Adversaries may also leverage a [Network Device CLI](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/008) on network devices to discover password policy information (e.g. <code>show aaa</code>, <code>show aaa common-criteria policy all</code>).(Citation: US-CERT-TA18-106A) Password policies can be discovered in cloud environments using available APIs such as <code>GetAccountPasswordPolicy</code> in AWS (Citation: AWS GetPasswordPolicy).
Near-miss passage: T1007 System Service Discovery. Tactics: discovery. Description: Adversaries may try to gather information about registered local system services. Adversaries may obtain information about services using tools as well as OS utility commands such as <code>sc query</code>, <code>tasklist /svc</code>, <code>systemctl --type=service</code>, and <code>net start</code>. Adversaries may also gather information about schedule tasks via commands such as `schtasks` on Windows or `crontab -l` on Linux and macOS.(Citation: Elastic Security Labs GOSAR 2024)(Citation: SentinelLabs macOS Malware 2021)(Citation: Splunk Linux Gormir 2024)(Citation: Aquasec Kinsing 2020) Adversaries may use the information from [System Service Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1007) during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including whether or not the adversary fully infects the target and/or attempts specific actions.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0524
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0524. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.5. SQL injection vulnerability in the Gateway Provisioning service in EMC Secure Remote Services Virtual Edition (ESRS VE) 3.02 and 3.03 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9330. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. The wp-all-import plugin before 3.2.5 for WordPress has blind SQL injection.
Query: rule covering Detects suspicious scheduled task creation events. Based on attributes such as paths, commands line flags, etc.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects suspicious scheduled task creation events. Based on attributes such as paths, commands line flags, etc.. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: Suspicious Scheduled Task Creation id: 3a734d25-df5c-4b99-8034-af1ddb5883a4 status: test description: Detects suspicious scheduled task creation events. Based on attributes such as paths, commands line flags, etc. references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-10/security/threat-protection/auditing/event-4698 author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-12-05 modified: 2022-12-07 tags: - attack.execution - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.persistence - attack.t1053.005 logsource: product: windows service: security definition: The Advanced Audit Policy setting Object Access > Audit Other Object Access Events has to be configured to allow this detection. We also recommend extracting the Command field from the embedded XML in the event data. detection: selection_eid: EventID: 4698 selection_paths: TaskContent|contains: - \AppData\Local\Temp\ - \AppData\Roaming\ - \Users\Public\ - \WINDOWS\Temp\ - C:\Temp\ - \Desktop\ - \Downloads\ - \Temporary Internet - C:\ProgramData\ - C:\Perflogs\ selection_commands: TaskContent|contains: - regsvr32 - rundll32 - cmd.exe</Command> - cmd</Command> - '<Arguments>/c ' - '<Arguments>/k ' - '<Arguments>/r ' - powershell - pwsh - mshta - wscript - cscript - certutil - bitsadmin - bash.exe - 'bash ' - scrcons - 'wmic ' - wmic.exe - forfiles - scriptrunner - hh.exe condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects email exfiltration via powershell cmdlets. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Email Exifiltration Via Powershell id: 312d0384-401c-4b8b-abdf-685ffba9a332 status: test description: Detects email exfiltration via powershell cmdlets references: - https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2022/09/07/profiling-dev-0270-phosphorus-ransomware-operations/ - https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel/blob/7e6aa438e254d468feec061618a7877aa528ee9f/Hunting%20Queries/Microsoft%20365%20Defender/Ransomware/DEV-0270/Email%20data%20exfiltration%20via%20PowerShell.yaml author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems), Azure-Sentinel (idea) date: 2022-09-09 tags: - attack.exfiltration logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: Image|endswith: - \powershell.exe - \pwsh.exe CommandLine|contains|all: - Add-PSSnapin - Get-Recipient - -ExpandProperty - EmailAddresses - SmtpAddress - -hidetableheaders condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-9294
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9294. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. The all-in-one-wp-security-and-firewall plugin before 3.9.5 for WordPress has XSS in add_query_arg and remove_query_arg function instances.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9377. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. iThemes Builder Theme Depot before 5.0.30 for WordPress has XSS via add_query_arg() and remove_query_arg().
Query: exploit The Yodobashi application 1.2.1.0 and earlier for Android allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java methods, and consequently obtain sensitive information or execute OS com
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2980. CWE: CWE-78. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. The Yodobashi application 1.2.1.0 and earlier for Android allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java methods, and consequently obtain sensitive information or execute OS commands, via a crafted HTML document.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6380. CWE: CWE-78. CVSS: 6.5. An unspecified script in the web interface in Cisco Firepower Extensible Operating System 1.1(1.160) on Firepower 9000 devices allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via crafted parameters, aka Bug ID CSCux10622.
Query: risk of Absolute path traversal vulnerability in SiteFactory CMS 5.5.9 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a full pathname in the file parameter to assets/download.aspx.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6914. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. Absolute path traversal vulnerability in SiteFactory CMS 5.5.9 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a full pathname in the file parameter to assets/download.aspx.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2060. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 5.300000190734863. cabextract before 1.6 does not properly check for leading slashes when extracting files, which allows remote attackers to conduct absolute directory traversal attacks via a malformed UTF-8 character that is changed to a UTF-8 encoded slash.
Query: vulnerability: RubyGems 2.0.x before 2.0.17, 2.2.x before 2.2.5, and 2.4.x before 2.4.8 does not validate the hostname when fetching gems or making API requests, which allows remote attackers to 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4020. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. RubyGems 2.0.x before 2.0.17, 2.2.x before 2.2.5, and 2.4.x before 2.4.8 does not validate the hostname when fetching gems or making API requests, which allows remote attackers to redirect requests to arbitrary domains via a crafted DNS SRV record with a domain that is suffixed with the original domain name, aka a "DNS hijack attack." NOTE: this vulnerability exists because to an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-3900.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9108. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile and Snapdragon Mobile MDM9625, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 820, and SD 820A, no address argument validation performed on calls to a QSEE syscall may lead to arbitrary read/write or NULL Pointer exception when calling a downstream function.
Query: exploit The oz_usb_handle_ep_data function in drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c in the OZWPAN driver in the Linux kernel through 4.0.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4003. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. The oz_usb_handle_ep_data function in drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c in the OZWPAN driver in the Linux kernel through 4.0.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero error and system crash) via a crafted packet.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2063. CWE: CWE-189. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Integer overflow in unace 1.2b allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a small file header in an ace archive, which triggers a buffer overflow.
Query: risk of Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alcatel-Lucent CellPipe 7130 RG 5Ae.M2013 HOL with firmware 1.0.0.20h.HOL allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4586. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alcatel-Lucent CellPipe 7130 RG 5Ae.M2013 HOL with firmware 1.0.0.20h.HOL allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a user account via an add_user action in a request to password.cmd.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0970. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SearchBlox before 8.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Query: SOC alert related to Exploitation for Credential Access
Matching passage: T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access. Tactics: credential access. Description: Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials. Exploitation of a software vulnerability occurs when an adversary takes advantage of a programming error in a program, service, or within the operating system software or kernel itself to execute adversary-controlled code. Credentialing and authentication mechanisms may be targeted for exploitation by adversaries as a means to gain access to useful credentials or circumvent the process to gain authenticated access to systems. One example of this is `MS14-068`, which targets Kerberos and can be used to forge Kerberos tickets using domain user permissions.(Citation: Technet MS14-068)(Citation: ADSecurity Detecting Forged Tickets) Another example of this is replay attacks, in which the adversary intercepts data packets sent between parties and then later replays these packets. If services don't properly validate authentication requests, these replayed packets may allow an adversary to impersonate one of the parties and gain unauthorized access or privileges.(Citation: Bugcrowd Replay Attack)(Citation: Comparitech Replay Attack)(Citation: Microsoft Midnight Blizzard Replay Attack) Such exploitation has been demonstrated in cloud environments as well. For example, adversaries have exploited vulnerabilities in public cloud infrastructure that allowed for unintended authentication token creation and renewal.(Citation: Storm-0558 techniques for unauthorized email access) Exploitation for credential access may also result in Privilege Escalation depending on the process targeted or credentials obtained.
Near-miss passage: T1056.003 Web Portal Capture. Tactics: collection, credential access. Description: Adversaries may install code on externally facing portals, such as a VPN login page, to capture and transmit credentials of users who attempt to log into the service. For example, a compromised login page may log provided user credentials before logging the user in to the service. This variation on input capture may be conducted post-compromise using legitimate administrative access as a backup measure to maintain network access through [External Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1133) and [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078) or as part of the initial compromise by exploitation of the externally facing web service.(Citation: Volexity Virtual Private Keylogging)
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0576
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0576. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.0. In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in HSDPA.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5120. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Shockwave Player before 12.1.9.159 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5121.
Query: telemetry for T1609
Matching passage: T1609 Container Administration Command. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse a container administration service to execute commands within a container. A container administration service such as the Docker daemon, the Kubernetes API server, or the kubelet may allow remote management of containers within an environment.(Citation: Docker Daemon CLI)(Citation: Kubernetes API)(Citation: Kubernetes Kubelet) In Docker, adversaries may specify an entrypoint during container deployment that executes a script or command, or they may use a command such as <code>docker exec</code> to execute a command within a running container.(Citation: Docker Entrypoint)(Citation: Docker Exec) In Kubernetes, if an adversary has sufficient permissions, they may gain remote execution in a container in the cluster via interaction with the Kubernetes API server, the kubelet, or by running a command such as <code>kubectl exec</code>.(Citation: Kubectl Exec Get Shell)
Near-miss passage: T1053.005 Scheduled Task. Tactics: execution, persistence, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may abuse the Windows Task Scheduler to perform task scheduling for initial or recurring execution of malicious code. There are multiple ways to access the Task Scheduler in Windows. The [schtasks](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0111) utility can be run directly on the command line, or the Task Scheduler can be opened through the GUI within the Administrator Tools section of the Control Panel.(Citation: Stack Overflow) In some cases, adversaries have used a .NET wrapper for the Windows Task Scheduler, and alternatively, adversaries have used the Windows netapi32 library and [Windows Management Instrumentation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1047) (WMI) to create a scheduled task. Adversaries may also utilize the Powershell Cmdlet `Invoke-CimMethod`, which leverages WMI class `PS_ScheduledTask` to create a scheduled task via an XML path.(Citation: Red Canary - Atomic Red Team) An adversary may use Windows Task Scheduler to execute programs at system startup or on a scheduled basis for persistence. The Windows Task Scheduler can also be abused to conduct remote Execution as part of Lateral Movement and/or to run a process under the context of a specified account (such as SYSTEM). Similar to [System Binary Proxy Execution](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1218), adversaries have also abused the Windows Task Scheduler to potentially mask one-time execution under signed/trusted system processes.(Citation: ProofPoint Serpent) Adversaries may also create "hidden" scheduled tasks (i.e. [Hide Artifacts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1564)) that may not be visible to defender tools and manual queries used to enumerate tasks. Specifically, an adversary may hide a task from `schtasks /query` and the Task Scheduler by deleting the associated Security Descriptor (SD) registry value (where deletion of this value must be completed using SYSTEM permissions).(Citation: SigmaHQ)(Citation: Tarrask scheduled task) Adversaries may also employ alternate me
Query: vulnerability: SQL Injection exists in AcyMailing Joomla Component before 4.9.5 via exportgeolocorder in a geolocation_longitude request to index.php.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7338. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. SQL Injection exists in AcyMailing Joomla Component before 4.9.5 via exportgeolocorder in a geolocation_longitude request to index.php.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5376. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. SQL injection vulnerability in the login form in GSI WiNPAT Portal 3.2.0.1001 through 3.6.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the username field.
Query: risk of Pulp does not remove permissions for named objects upon deletion, which allows authenticated users to gain the privileges of a deleted object via creating an object with the same n
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5153. CWE: CWE-275. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Pulp does not remove permissions for named objects upon deletion, which allows authenticated users to gain the privileges of a deleted object via creating an object with the same name.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8223. CWE: CWE-275. CVSS: 5.5. Huawei P7 before P7-L00C17B851, P7-L05C00B851, and P7-L09C92B85, and P8 ALE-UL00 before ALE-UL00B211 allows local users to cause a denial of service (OS crash) by leveraging camera permissions and via crafted input to the camera driver.