Query: Sigma rule for Detects the execution of a renamed version of the "Mavinject" process. Which can be abused to perform process injection
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the execution of a renamed version of the "Mavinject" process. Which can be abused to perform process injection. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Renamed Mavinject.EXE Execution id: e6474a1b-5390-49cd-ab41-8d88655f7394 status: test description: Detects the execution of a renamed version of the "Mavinject" process. Which can be abused to perform process injection using the "/INJECTRUNNING" flag references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1218/T1218.md - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1056.004/T1056.004.md - https://posts.specterops.io/mavinject-exe-functionality-deconstructed-c29ab2cf5c0e - https://twitter.com/gN3mes1s/status/941315826107510784 - https://reaqta.com/2017/12/mavinject-microsoft-injector/ - https://twitter.com/Hexacorn/status/776122138063409152 - https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/issues/3742 - https://github.com/keyboardcrunch/SentinelOne-ATTACK-Queries/blob/6a228d23eefe963ca81f2d52f94b815f61ef5ee0/Tactics/DefenseEvasion.md#t1055-process-injection author: frack113, Florian Roth date: 2022-12-05 modified: 2023-02-03 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth - attack.t1055.001 - attack.t1218.013 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: OriginalFileName: - mavinject32.exe - mavinject64.exe filter: Image|endswith: - \mavinject32.exe - \mavinject64.exe condition: selection and not filter falsepositives: - Unlikely level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the creation or patching of potential malicious RoleBinding. This includes RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBinding.. Logsource: gcp / gcp.audit. Rule: title: Google Cloud Kubernetes RoleBinding id: 0322d9f2-289a-47c2-b5e1-b63c90901a3e status: test description: Detects the creation or patching of potential malicious RoleBinding. This includes RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBinding. references: - https://github.com/elastic/detection-rules/pull/1267 - https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/kubernetes-api/authorization-resources/cluster-role-v1/#ClusterRole - https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/role-based-access-control - https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/ - https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/audit-logging author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-08-09 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.credential-access logsource: product: gcp service: gcp.audit detection: selection: gcp.audit.method_name: - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.clusterrolebindings.create - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.rolebindings.create - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.clusterrolebindings.patch - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.rolebindings.patch - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.clusterrolebindings.update - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.rolebindings.update - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.clusterrolebindings.delete - io.k8s.authorization.rbac.v*.rolebindings.delete condition: selection falsepositives: - RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBinding being modified or deleted may be performed by a system administrator. Verify whether the user identity, user agent, and/or hostname should be making changes in your environment. - RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBinding modified or deleted from unfamiliar users should be investigated. If known behavior is causing false positives, it can be exempted from the rule. level: medium