alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: describe CVE-2015-8413
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8413. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, and CVE-2015-8454.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0881. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. CRLF injection vulnerability in Squid before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted header in a response.
Query: describe CVE-2015-4634
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4634. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.5. SQL injection vulnerability in graphs.php in Cacti before 0.8.8e allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the local_graph_id parameter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9244. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Keys of objects in mysql node module v2.0.0-alpha7 and earlier are not escaped with `mysql.escape()` which could lead to SQL Injection.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0676
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0676. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.099999904632568. The DNS implementation in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 7.2 before 7.2(5.16), 8.2 before 8.2(5.57), 8.3 before 8.3(2.44), 8.4 before 8.4(7.28), 8.5 before 8.5(1.24), 8.6 before 8.6(1.17), 8.7 before 8.7(1.16), 9.0 before 9.0(4.33), 9.1 before 9.1(6.1), 9.2 before 9.2(3.4), and 9.3 before 9.3(3) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or device outage) by triggering outbound DNS queries and then sending crafted responses to these queries, aka Bug ID CSCuq77655.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4648. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.5. Stack-based buffer overflow in the Ipropsapi.ipropsapiCtrl.1 ActiveX control in ipropsapivideo in Panasonic Security API (PS-API) ActiveX SDK before 8.10.18 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string to the MulticastAddr method.
Query: what is T1563.002
Matching passage: T1563.002 RDP Hijacking. Tactics: lateral movement. Description: Adversaries may hijack a legitimate user’s remote desktop session to move laterally within an environment. Remote desktop is a common feature in operating systems. It allows a user to log into an interactive session with a system desktop graphical user interface on a remote system. Microsoft refers to its implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) as Remote Desktop Services (RDS).(Citation: TechNet Remote Desktop Services) Adversaries may perform RDP session hijacking which involves stealing a legitimate user's remote session. Typically, a user is notified when someone else is trying to steal their session. With System permissions and using Terminal Services Console, `c:\windows\system32\tscon.exe [session number to be stolen]`, an adversary can hijack a session without the need for credentials or prompts to the user.(Citation: RDP Hijacking Korznikov) This can be done remotely or locally and with active or disconnected sessions.(Citation: RDP Hijacking Medium) It can also lead to [Remote System Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1018) and Privilege Escalation by stealing a Domain Admin or higher privileged account session. All of this can be done by using native Windows commands, but it has also been added as a feature in red teaming tools.(Citation: Kali Redsnarf)
Near-miss passage: T1563.001 SSH Hijacking. Tactics: lateral movement. Description: Adversaries may hijack a legitimate user's SSH session to move laterally within an environment. Secure Shell (SSH) is a standard means of remote access on Linux and macOS systems. It allows a user to connect to another system via an encrypted tunnel, commonly authenticating through a password, certificate or the use of an asymmetric encryption key pair. In order to move laterally from a compromised host, adversaries may take advantage of trust relationships established with other systems via public key authentication in active SSH sessions by hijacking an existing connection to another system. This may occur through compromising the SSH agent itself or by having access to the agent's socket. If an adversary is able to obtain root access, then hijacking SSH sessions is likely trivial.(Citation: Slideshare Abusing SSH)(Citation: SSHjack Blackhat)(Citation: Clockwork SSH Agent Hijacking)(Citation: Breach Post-mortem SSH Hijack) [SSH Hijacking](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1563/001) differs from use of [SSH](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/004) because it hijacks an existing SSH session rather than creating a new session using [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078).
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-5718
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5718. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 4.0. Stack-based buffer overflow in the handle_debug_network function in the manager in Websense Content Gateway before 8.0.0 HF02 allows remote administrators to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted diagnostic command line request to submit_net_debug.cgi.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5792. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. WebKit, as used in Apple iOS before 9 and iTunes before 12.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other WebKit CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2015-09-16-1 and APPLE-SA-2015-09-16-3.
Query: describe CVE-2015-6108
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6108. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. The Windows font library in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT Gold and 8.1; Office 2007 SP3; Office 2010 SP2; Word Viewer; .NET Framework 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, 4.5, 4.5.1, 4.5.2, and 4.6; Skype for Business 2016; Lync 2010; Lync 2013 SP1; Live Meeting 2007 Console; and Silverlight 5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted embedded font, aka "Graphics Memory Corruption Vulnerability."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0973. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Buffer overflow in the png_read_IDAT_data function in pngrutil.c in libpng before 1.5.21 and 1.6.x before 1.6.16 allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via IDAT data with a large width, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-9495.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-2702
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2702. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Message Log in the Email Security Gateway in Websense TRITON AP-EMAIL before 8.0.0 and V-Series 7.7 appliances allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the sender address in an email.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2992. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Apache Struts before 2.3.20 has a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.
Query: common weakness: Improper Neutralization of Multiple Trailing Special Elements
Matching passage: CWE-163 Improper Neutralization of Multiple Trailing Special Elements. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes multiple trailing special elements that could be interpreted in unexpected ways when they are sent to a downstream component.
Near-miss passage: CWE-647 Use of Non-Canonical URL Paths for Authorization Decisions. The product defines policy namespaces and makes authorization decisions based on the assumption that a URL is canonical. This can allow a non-canonical URL to bypass the authorization.
Query: Persistence mechanism resembling Exfiltration Over Symmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol
Matching passage: T1048.001 Exfiltration Over Symmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over a symmetrically encrypted network protocol other than that of the existing command and control channel. The data may also be sent to an alternate network location from the main command and control server. Symmetric encryption algorithms are those that use shared or the same keys/secrets on each end of the channel. This requires an exchange or pre-arranged agreement/possession of the value used to encrypt and decrypt data. Network protocols that use asymmetric encryption often utilize symmetric encryption once keys are exchanged, but adversaries may opt to manually share keys and implement symmetric cryptographic algorithms (ex: RC4, AES) vice using mechanisms that are baked into a protocol. This may result in multiple layers of encryption (in protocols that are natively encrypted such as HTTPS) or encryption in protocols that not typically encrypted (such as HTTP or FTP).
Near-miss passage: T1048.002 Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over an asymmetrically encrypted network protocol other than that of the existing command and control channel. The data may also be sent to an alternate network location from the main command and control server. Asymmetric encryption algorithms are those that use different keys on each end of the channel. Also known as public-key cryptography, this requires pairs of cryptographic keys that can encrypt/decrypt data from the corresponding key. Each end of the communication channels requires a private key (only in the procession of that entity) and the public key of the other entity. The public keys of each entity are exchanged before encrypted communications begin. Network protocols that use asymmetric encryption (such as HTTPS/TLS/SSL) often utilize symmetric encryption once keys are exchanged. Adversaries may opt to use these encrypted mechanisms that are baked into a protocol.
Query: detection rule: Detects the creation of a scheduled task using schtasks.exe, potentially in combination with curl for downloading payloa
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the creation of a scheduled task using schtasks.exe, potentially in combination with curl for downloading payloa. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Scheduled Task Creation with Curl and PowerShell Execution Combo id: 1d174d38-8fda-4081-a9b6-56d9763c0cd8 status: experimental description: 'Detects the creation of a scheduled task using schtasks.exe, potentially in combination with curl for downloading payloads and PowerShell for executing them. This facilitates executing malicious payloads or connecting with C&C server persistently without dropping the malware sample on the host. ' references: - https://tria.ge/241015-l98snsyeje/behavioral2 author: Swachchhanda Shrawan Poudel (Nextron Systems) date: 2025-02-05 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.execution - attack.persistence - attack.stealth - attack.t1053.005 - attack.t1218 - attack.command-and-control - attack.t1105 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: Image|endswith: \schtasks.exe CommandLine|contains|windash: ' /create ' selection_curl: CommandLine|contains|all: - 'curl ' - http - -o selection_powershell: CommandLine|contains: powershell condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Legitimate use of schtasks for administrative purposes. - Automation scripts combining curl and PowerShell in controlled environments. level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the creation of a file that has the same name as the default LiveKD kernel memory dump.. Logsource: windows / file_event. Rule: title: LiveKD Kernel Memory Dump File Created id: 814ddeca-3d31-4265-8e07-8cc54fb44903 status: test description: Detects the creation of a file that has the same name as the default LiveKD kernel memory dump. references: - Internal Research author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-05-16 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth logsource: product: windows category: file_event detection: selection: TargetFilename: C:\Windows\livekd.dmp condition: selection falsepositives: - In rare occasions administrators might leverage LiveKD to perform live kernel debugging. This should not be allowed on production systems. Investigate and apply additional filters where necessary. level: high
Query: detect Identifies when a Google Cloud Kubernetes CronJob runs in Azure Cloud. Kubernetes Job is a controller that creates one o in logs
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Identifies when a Google Cloud Kubernetes CronJob runs in Azure Cloud. Kubernetes Job is a controller that creates one o. Logsource: gcp / gcp.audit. Rule: title: Google Cloud Kubernetes CronJob id: cd3a808c-c7b7-4c50-a2f3-f4cfcd436435 status: test description: 'Identifies when a Google Cloud Kubernetes CronJob runs in Azure Cloud. Kubernetes Job is a controller that creates one or more pods and ensures that a specified number of them successfully terminate. Kubernetes Job can be used to run containers that perform finite tasks for batch jobs. Kubernetes CronJob is used to schedule Jobs. An Adversary may use Kubernetes CronJob for scheduling execution of malicious code that would run as a container in the cluster. ' references: - https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs - https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/cron-jobs/ - https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/job/ author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-11-22 modified: 2022-12-25 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.execution logsource: product: gcp service: gcp.audit detection: selection: gcp.audit.method_name: - io.k8s.api.batch.v*.Job - io.k8s.api.batch.v*.CronJob condition: selection falsepositives: - Google Cloud Kubernetes CronJob/Job may be done by a system administrator. - If known behavior is causing false positives, it can be exempted from the rule. level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects when an user account is locked or suspended.. Logsource: onelogin / onelogin.events. Rule: title: OneLogin User Account Locked id: a717c561-d117-437e-b2d9-0118a7035d01 status: test description: Detects when an user account is locked or suspended. references: - https://developers.onelogin.com/api-docs/1/events/event-resource/ author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-10-12 modified: 2022-12-25 tags: - attack.impact logsource: product: onelogin service: onelogin.events detection: selection1: event_type_id: 532 selection2: event_type_id: 553 selection3: event_type_id: 551 condition: 1 of selection* falsepositives: - System may lock or suspend user accounts. level: low
Query: rule covering Detects deployments of pods within the kube-system namespace, which could be intended to imitate system pods. System pod
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects deployments of pods within the kube-system namespace, which could be intended to imitate system pods. System pod. Logsource: kubernetes / application / audit. Rule: title: Creation Of Pod In System Namespace id: a80d927d-ac6e-443f-a867-e8d6e3897318 status: test description: 'Detects deployments of pods within the kube-system namespace, which could be intended to imitate system pods. System pods, created by controllers such as Deployments or DaemonSets have random suffixes in their names. Attackers can use this fact and name their backdoor pods as if they were created by these controllers to avoid detection. Deployment of such a backdoor container e.g. named kube-proxy-bv61v, could be attempted in the kube-system namespace alongside the other administrative containers. ' references: - https://microsoft.github.io/Threat-Matrix-for-Kubernetes/techniques/Pod%20or%20container%20name%20similarily/ author: Leo Tsaousis (@laripping) date: 2024-03-26 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1036.005 logsource: category: application product: kubernetes service: audit detection: selection: verb: create objectRef.resource: pods objectRef.namespace: kube-system condition: selection falsepositives: - System components such as daemon-set-controller and kube-scheduler also create pods in the kube-system namespace level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the use of the bcdedit command to tamper with the boot configuration data. This technique is often times used by. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Boot Configuration Tampering Via Bcdedit.EXE id: 1444443e-6757-43e4-9ea4-c8fc705f79a2 status: stable description: Detects the use of the bcdedit command to tamper with the boot configuration data. This technique is often times used by malware or attackers as a destructive way before launching ransomware. references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1490/T1490.md - https://eqllib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/analytics/c4732632-9c1d-4980-9fa8-1d98c93f918e.html author: E.M. Anhaus (originally from Atomic Blue Detections, Endgame), oscd.community date: 2019-10-24 modified: 2023-02-15 tags: - attack.impact - attack.t1490 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \bcdedit.exe - OriginalFileName: bcdedit.exe selection_set: CommandLine|contains: set selection_cli: - CommandLine|contains|all: - bootstatuspolicy - ignoreallfailures - CommandLine|contains|all: - recoveryenabled - 'no' condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unlikely level: high simulation: - type: atomic-red-team name: Windows - Disable Windows Recovery Console Repair technique: T1490 atomic_guid: cf21060a-80b3-4238-a595-22525de4ab81
Query: detection engineering for Binary Padding
Matching passage: T1027.001 Binary Padding. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may use binary padding to add junk data and change the on-disk representation of malware. This can be done without affecting the functionality or behavior of a binary, but can increase the size of the binary beyond what some security tools are capable of handling due to file size limitations. Binary padding effectively changes the checksum of the file and can also be used to avoid hash-based blocklists and static anti-virus signatures.(Citation: ESET OceanLotus) The padding used is commonly generated by a function to create junk data and then appended to the end or applied to sections of malware.(Citation: Securelist Malware Tricks April 2017) Increasing the file size may decrease the effectiveness of certain tools and detection capabilities that are not designed or configured to scan large files. This may also reduce the likelihood of being collected for analysis. Public file scanning services, such as VirusTotal, limits the maximum size of an uploaded file to be analyzed.(Citation: VirusTotal FAQ)
Near-miss passage: T1027.016 Junk Code Insertion. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may use junk code / dead code to obfuscate a malware’s functionality. Junk code is code that either does not execute, or if it does execute, does not change the functionality of the code. Junk code makes analysis more difficult and time-consuming, as the analyst steps through non-functional code instead of analyzing the main code. It also may hinder detections that rely on static code analysis due to the use of benign functionality, especially when combined with [Compression](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1027/015) or [Software Packing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1027/002).(Citation: ReasonLabs)(Citation: ReasonLabs Cyberpedia Junk Code) No-Operation (NOP) instructions are an example of dead code commonly used in x86 assembly language. They are commonly used as the 0x90 opcode. When NOPs are added to malware, the disassembler may show the NOP instructions, leading to the analyst needing to step through them.(Citation: ReasonLabs) The use of junk / dead code insertion is distinct from [Binary Padding](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1027/001) because the purpose is to obfuscate the functionality of the code, rather than simply to change the malware’s signature.
Query: explain T1602.002 Network Device Configuration Dump
Matching passage: T1602.002 Network Device Configuration Dump. Tactics: collection. Description: Adversaries may access network configuration files to collect sensitive data about the device and the network. The network configuration is a file containing parameters that determine the operation of the device. The device typically stores an in-memory copy of the configuration while operating, and a separate configuration on non-volatile storage to load after device reset. Adversaries can inspect the configuration files to reveal information about the target network and its layout, the network device and its software, or identifying legitimate accounts and credentials for later use. Adversaries can use common management tools and protocols, such as Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) and Smart Install (SMI), to access network configuration files.(Citation: US-CERT TA18-106A Network Infrastructure Devices 2018)(Citation: Cisco Blog Legacy Device Attacks) These tools may be used to query specific data from a configuration repository or configure the device to export the configuration for later analysis.
Near-miss passage: T1602 Data from Configuration Repository. Tactics: collection. Description: Adversaries may collect data related to managed devices from configuration repositories. Configuration repositories are used by management systems in order to configure, manage, and control data on remote systems. Configuration repositories may also facilitate remote access and administration of devices. Adversaries may target these repositories in order to collect large quantities of sensitive system administration data. Data from configuration repositories may be exposed by various protocols and software and can store a wide variety of data, much of which may align with adversary Discovery objectives.(Citation: US-CERT-TA18-106A)(Citation: US-CERT TA17-156A SNMP Abuse 2017)