alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-10057
Matching passage: CVE-2015-10057. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. A vulnerability was found in Little Apps Little Software Stats. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file inc/class.securelogin.php of the component Password Reset Handler. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. Upgrading to version 0.2 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 07ba8273a9311d1383f3686ac7cb32f20770ab1e. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-218401 was assigned to this vulnerability.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3072. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended restrictions on JavaScript API execution via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-3060, CVE-2015-3061, CVE-2015-3062, CVE-2015-3063, CVE-2015-3064, CVE-2015-3065, CVE-2015-3066, CVE-2015-3067, CVE-2015-3068, CVE-2015-3069, CVE-2015-3071, CVE-2015-3073, and CVE-2015-3074.
Query: Sigma YAML for windows / process_creation
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects usage of the "ms-appinstaller" protocol handler via command line to potentially download arbitrary files via App. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential File Download Via MS-AppInstaller Protocol Handler id: 180c7c5c-d64b-4a63-86e9-68910451bc8b related: - id: 7cff77e1-9663-46a3-8260-17f2e1aa9d0a type: derived status: test description: 'Detects usage of the "ms-appinstaller" protocol handler via command line to potentially download arbitrary files via AppInstaller.EXE The downloaded files are temporarly stored in ":\Users\%username%\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.DesktopAppInstaller_8wekyb3d8bbwe\AC\INetCache\<RANDOM-8-CHAR-DIRECTORY>" ' references: - https://lolbas-project.github.io/lolbas/Binaries/AppInstaller/ author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems), Swachchhanda Shrawan Poudel date: 2023-11-09 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1218 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: CommandLine|contains|all: - ms-appinstaller://?source= - http condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects when an attacker adds a new "DLLPathOverride" value to the "Natural Language" key in order to achieve persistenc. Logsource: windows / registry_set. Rule: title: Potential Persistence Via DLLPathOverride id: a1b1fd53-9c4a-444c-bae0-34a330fc7aa8 status: test description: Detects when an attacker adds a new "DLLPathOverride" value to the "Natural Language" key in order to achieve persistence which will get invoked by "SearchIndexer.exe" process references: - https://persistence-info.github.io/Data/naturallanguage6.html - https://www.hexacorn.com/blog/2018/12/30/beyond-good-ol-run-key-part-98/ author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-07-21 modified: 2023-08-17 tags: - attack.persistence logsource: category: registry_set product: windows detection: selection_root: TargetObject|contains: \SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\ContentIndex\Language\ selection_values: TargetObject|contains: - \StemmerDLLPathOverride - \WBDLLPathOverride - \StemmerClass - \WBreakerClass condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: hunt for Access Token Manipulation activity
Matching passage: T1134 Access Token Manipulation. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token. An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. [Token Impersonation/Theft](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001)) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. [Create Process with Token](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/002)). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation) Any standard user can use the <code>runas</code> command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.
Near-miss passage: T1134.003 Make and Impersonate Token. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may make new tokens and impersonate users to escalate privileges and bypass access controls. For example, if an adversary has a username and password but the user is not logged onto the system the adversary can then create a logon session for the user using the `LogonUser` function.(Citation: LogonUserW function) The function will return a copy of the new session's access token and the adversary can use `SetThreadToken` to assign the token to a thread. This behavior is distinct from [Token Impersonation/Theft](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001) in that this refers to creating a new user token instead of stealing or duplicating an existing one.
Query: explain T1587.004 Exploits
Matching passage: T1587.004 Exploits. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may develop exploits that can be used during targeting. An exploit takes advantage of a bug or vulnerability in order to cause unintended or unanticipated behavior to occur on computer hardware or software. Rather than finding/modifying exploits from online or purchasing them from exploit vendors, an adversary may develop their own exploits.(Citation: NYTStuxnet) Adversaries may use information acquired via [Vulnerabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588/006) to focus exploit development efforts. As part of the exploit development process, adversaries may uncover exploitable vulnerabilities through methods such as fuzzing and patch analysis.(Citation: Irongeek Sims BSides 2017) As with legitimate development efforts, different skill sets may be required for developing exploits. The skills needed may be located in-house, or may need to be contracted out. Use of a contractor may be considered an extension of that adversary's exploit development capabilities, provided the adversary plays a role in shaping requirements and maintains an initial degree of exclusivity to the exploit. Adversaries may use exploits during various phases of the adversary lifecycle (i.e. [Exploit Public-Facing Application](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1190), [Exploitation for Client Execution](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1203), [Exploitation for Privilege Escalation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1068), [Exploitation for Stealth](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1211), [Exploitation for Credential Access](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1212), [Exploitation of Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1210), and [Application or System Exploitation](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1499/004)).
Near-miss passage: T1587 Develop Capabilities. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may build capabilities that can be used during targeting. Rather than purchasing, freely downloading, or stealing capabilities, adversaries may develop their own capabilities in-house. This is the process of identifying development requirements and building solutions such as malware, exploits, and self-signed certificates. Adversaries may develop capabilities to support their operations throughout numerous phases of the adversary lifecycle.(Citation: Mandiant APT1)(Citation: Kaspersky Sofacy)(Citation: Bitdefender StrongPity June 2020)(Citation: Talos Promethium June 2020) As with legitimate development efforts, different skill sets may be required for developing capabilities. The skills needed may be located in-house, or may need to be contracted out. Use of a contractor may be considered an extension of that adversary's development capabilities, provided the adversary plays a role in shaping requirements and maintains a degree of exclusivity to the capability.
Query: Sigma rule for Detects default CSExec pipe creation
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects default CSExec pipe creation. Logsource: windows / pipe_created. Rule: title: PUA - CSExec Default Named Pipe id: f318b911-ea88-43f4-9281-0de23ede628e related: - id: 9e77ed63-2ecf-4c7b-b09d-640834882028 type: obsolete status: test description: Detects default CSExec pipe creation references: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lKya3_mLnR3UQuCoiYruO3qgu052_iS_/view - https://github.com/malcomvetter/CSExec author: Nikita Nazarov, oscd.community, Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-08-07 modified: 2023-11-30 tags: - attack.lateral-movement - attack.t1021.002 - attack.execution - attack.t1569.002 logsource: product: windows category: pipe_created definition: Note that you have to configure logging for Named Pipe Events in Sysmon config (Event ID 17 and Event ID 18). The basic configuration is in popular sysmon configuration (https://github.com/SwiftOnSecurity/sysmon-config), but it is worth verifying. You can also use other repo, e.g. https://github.com/Neo23x0/sysmon-config, https://github.com/olafhartong/sysmon-modular. How to test detection? You can check powershell script from this site https://svch0st.medium.com/guide-to-named-pipes-and-hunting-for-cobalt-strike-pipes-dc46b2c5f575 detection: selection: PipeName|contains: \csexecsvc condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate Administrator activity level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential DLL hijack of "iertutil.dll" found in the DCOM InternetExplorer.Application Class. Logsource: windows / image_load. Rule: title: Potential DCOM InternetExplorer.Application DLL Hijack - Image Load id: f354eba5-623b-450f-b073-0b5b2773b6aa related: - id: e554f142-5cf3-4e55-ace9-a1b59e0def65 type: obsolete - id: 2f7979ae-f82b-45af-ac1d-2b10e93b0baa type: similar status: test description: Detects potential DLL hijack of "iertutil.dll" found in the DCOM InternetExplorer.Application Class references: - https://threathunterplaybook.com/hunts/windows/201009-RemoteDCOMIErtUtilDLLHijack/notebook.html author: Roberto Rodriguez @Cyb3rWard0g, Open Threat Research (OTR), wagga date: 2020-10-12 modified: 2022-12-18 tags: - attack.lateral-movement - attack.t1021.002 - attack.t1021.003 logsource: product: windows category: image_load detection: selection: Image|endswith: \Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe ImageLoaded|endswith: \Internet Explorer\iertutil.dll condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: critical
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-5035
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5035. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 5.400000095367432. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Connections 3.x before 3.0.1.1 CR3, 4.0 before CR4, 4.5 before CR5, and 5.0 before CR3 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5036.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2939. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Scribunto extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a function name, which is not properly handled in a Lua error backtrace.
Query: risk of mediaserver in Android before 5.1.1 LMY48X and 6.0 before 2015-11-01 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, and consequently bypass an unspecified protection mech
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6611. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. mediaserver in Android before 5.1.1 LMY48X and 6.0 before 2015-11-01 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, and consequently bypass an unspecified protection mechanism, via unknown vectors, aka internal bugs 23905951, 23912202, 23953967, 23696300, 23600291, 23756261, 23541506, 23284974, 23542351, and 23542352, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8074.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2421. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 11 allows remote attackers to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer ASLR Bypass."
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-3886
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3886. CWE: CWE-295. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. libinfinity before 0.6.6-1 does not validate expired SSL certificates, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2330. CWE: CWE-295. CVSS: 7.5. Late TLS certificate verification in WebKitGTK+ prior to 2.6.6 allows remote attackers to view a secure HTTP request, including, for example, secure cookies.
Query: threat report mentioning Wordlist Scanning
Matching passage: T1595.003 Wordlist Scanning. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may iteratively probe infrastructure using brute-forcing and crawling techniques. While this technique employs similar methods to [Brute Force](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110), its goal is the identification of content and infrastructure rather than the discovery of valid credentials. Wordlists used in these scans may contain generic, commonly used names and file extensions or terms specific to a particular software. Adversaries may also create custom, target-specific wordlists using data gathered from other Reconnaissance techniques (ex: [Gather Victim Org Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1591), or [Search Victim-Owned Websites](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1594)). For example, adversaries may use web content discovery tools such as Dirb, DirBuster, and GoBuster and generic or custom wordlists to enumerate a website’s pages and directories.(Citation: ClearSky Lebanese Cedar Jan 2021) This can help them to discover old, vulnerable pages or hidden administrative portals that could become the target of further operations (ex: [Exploit Public-Facing Application](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1190) or [Brute Force](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110)). As cloud storage solutions typically use globally unique names, adversaries may also use target-specific wordlists and tools such as s3recon and GCPBucketBrute to enumerate public and private buckets on cloud infrastructure.(Citation: S3Recon GitHub)(Citation: GCPBucketBrute) Once storage objects are discovered, adversaries may leverage [Data from Cloud Storage](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1530) to access valuable information that can be exfiltrated or used to escalate privileges and move laterally.
Near-miss passage: T1595.001 Scanning IP Blocks. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may scan victim IP blocks to gather information that can be used during targeting. Public IP addresses may be allocated to organizations by block, or a range of sequential addresses. Adversaries may scan IP blocks in order to [Gather Victim Network Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1590), such as which IP addresses are actively in use as well as more detailed information about hosts assigned these addresses. Scans may range from simple pings (ICMP requests and responses) to more nuanced scans that may reveal host software/versions via server banners or other network artifacts.(Citation: Botnet Scan) Information from these scans may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593) or [Search Open Technical Databases](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1596)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Develop Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1587) or [Obtain Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588)), and/or initial access (ex: [External Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1133)).
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-10107
Matching passage: CVE-2015-10107. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. A vulnerability was found in Simplr Registration Form Plus+ Plugin up to 2.3.4 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.3.5 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is d588446844dd49232ab400ef213ff5b92121c33e. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-230153 was assigned to this vulnerability.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7822. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 5.0. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Kentico CMS 8.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a (1) parameter name to CMSModules/AdminControls/Pages/UIPage.aspx or the (2) CMSBodyClass cookie variable to the default URI.
Query: weakness Path Equivalence: 'file name' (Internal Whitespace)
Matching passage: CWE-48 Path Equivalence: 'file name' (Internal Whitespace). The product accepts path input in the form of internal space ('file(SPACE)name') without appropriate validation, which can lead to ambiguous path resolution and allow an attacker to traverse the file system to unintended locations or access arbitrary files.
Near-miss passage: CWE-161 Improper Neutralization of Multiple Leading Special Elements. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes multiple leading special elements that could be interpreted in unexpected ways when they are sent to a downstream component.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0930
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0930. CWE: CWE-255. CVSS: 10.0. The web interface on SerVision HVG Video Gateway devices with firmware before 2.2.26a100 has a hardcoded administrative password, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via an HTTP session.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7819. CWE: CWE-255. CVSS: 5.0. The DB service in IBM System Networking Switch Center (SNSC) before 7.3.1.5 and Lenovo Switch Center before 8.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive administrator-account information via a request on port 40999, as demonstrated by an improperly encrypted password.
Query: describe CVE-2015-8505
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8505. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. mediaserver in Android before 5.1.1 LMY48Z allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted media file, aka internal bug 17769851, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6616, CVE-2015-8506, and CVE-2015-8507.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5380. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.5. The Utf8DecoderBase::WriteUtf16Slow function in unicode-decoder.cc in Google V8, as used in Node.js before 0.12.6, io.js before 1.8.3 and 2.x before 2.3.3, and other products, does not verify that there is memory available for a UTF-16 surrogate pair, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted byte sequence.
Query: actor TTPs: Proxy
Matching passage: T1090 Proxy. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may use a connection proxy to direct network traffic between systems or act as an intermediary for network communications to a command and control server to avoid direct connections to their infrastructure. Many tools exist that enable traffic redirection through proxies or port redirection, including [HTRAN](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0040), ZXProxy, and ZXPortMap. (Citation: Trend Micro APT Attack Tools) Adversaries use these types of proxies to manage command and control communications, reduce the number of simultaneous outbound network connections, provide resiliency in the face of connection loss, or to ride over existing trusted communications paths between victims to avoid suspicion. Adversaries may chain together multiple proxies to further disguise the source of malicious traffic. Adversaries can also take advantage of routing schemes in Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) to proxy command and control traffic.
Near-miss passage: T1090.002 External Proxy. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may use an external proxy to act as an intermediary for network communications to a command and control server to avoid direct connections to their infrastructure. Many tools exist that enable traffic redirection through proxies or port redirection, including [HTRAN](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0040), ZXProxy, and ZXPortMap. (Citation: Trend Micro APT Attack Tools) Adversaries use these types of proxies to manage command and control communications, to provide resiliency in the face of connection loss, or to ride over existing trusted communications paths to avoid suspicion. External connection proxies are used to mask the destination of C2 traffic and are typically implemented with port redirectors. Compromised systems outside of the victim environment may be used for these purposes, as well as purchased infrastructure such as cloud-based resources or virtual private servers. Proxies may be chosen based on the low likelihood that a connection to them from a compromised system would be investigated. Victim systems would communicate directly with the external proxy on the Internet and then the proxy would forward communications to the C2 server.
Query: alert when Detects when a Microsoft Cloud App Security reported when a user or IP address uses an app that is not sanctioned to per
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects when a Microsoft Cloud App Security reported when a user or IP address uses an app that is not sanctioned to per. Logsource: m365 / threat_management. Rule: title: Data Exfiltration to Unsanctioned Apps id: 2b669496-d215-47d8-bd9a-f4a45bf07cda status: test description: Detects when a Microsoft Cloud App Security reported when a user or IP address uses an app that is not sanctioned to perform an activity that resembles an attempt to exfiltrate information from your organization. references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-cloud-apps/anomaly-detection-policy - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-cloud-apps/policy-template-reference author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-08-23 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.exfiltration - attack.t1537 logsource: service: threat_management product: m365 detection: selection: eventSource: SecurityComplianceCenter eventName: Data exfiltration to unsanctioned apps status: success condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential OGNL Injection exploitation, which may lead to RCE. OGNL is an expression language that is supported i. Logsource: jvm / application. Rule: title: Potential OGNL Injection Exploitation In JVM Based Application id: 4d0af518-828e-4a04-a751-a7d03f3046ad status: test description: 'Detects potential OGNL Injection exploitation, which may lead to RCE. OGNL is an expression language that is supported in many JVM based systems. OGNL Injection is the reason for some high profile RCE''s such as Apache Struts (CVE-2017-5638) and Confluence (CVE-2022-26134) ' references: - https://www.wix.engineering/post/threat-and-vulnerability-hunting-with-application-server-error-logs author: Moti Harmats date: 2023-02-11 tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1190 - cve.2017-5638 - cve.2022-26134 logsource: category: application product: jvm definition: 'Requirements: application error logs must be collected (with LOG_LEVEL=ERROR and above)' detection: keywords: - org.apache.commons.ognl.OgnlException - ExpressionSyntaxException condition: keywords falsepositives: - Application bugs level: high