alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: threat report mentioning Serverless
Matching passage: T1584.007 Serverless. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise serverless cloud infrastructure, such as Cloudflare Workers, AWS Lambda functions, or Google Apps Scripts, that can be used during targeting. By utilizing serverless infrastructure, adversaries can make it more difficult to attribute infrastructure used during operations back to them. Once compromised, the serverless runtime environment can be leveraged to either respond directly to infected machines or to [Proxy](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1090) traffic to an adversary-owned command and control server.(Citation: BlackWater Malware Cloudflare Workers)(Citation: AWS Lambda Redirector)(Citation: GWS Apps Script Abuse 2021) As traffic generated by these functions will appear to come from subdomains of common cloud providers, it may be difficult to distinguish from ordinary traffic to these providers - making it easier to [Hide Infrastructure](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1665).(Citation: Detecting Command & Control in the Cloud)(Citation: BlackWater Malware Cloudflare Workers)
Near-miss passage: T1584.005 Botnet. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise numerous third-party systems to form a botnet that can be used during targeting. A botnet is a network of compromised systems that can be instructed to perform coordinated tasks.(Citation: Norton Botnet) Instead of purchasing/renting a botnet from a booter/stresser service, adversaries may build their own botnet by compromising numerous third-party systems.(Citation: Imperva DDoS for Hire) Adversaries may also conduct a takeover of an existing botnet, such as redirecting bots to adversary-controlled C2 servers.(Citation: Dell Dridex Oct 2015) With a botnet at their disposal, adversaries may perform follow-on activity such as large-scale [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) or Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS).
Query: vulnerability: Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.26 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Server : Replication.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4890. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 3.5. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.26 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Server : Replication.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0424. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. Unspecified vulnerability in the Integrated Lights Out Manager (ILOM) component in Oracle Sun Systems Products Suite ILOM prior to 3.2.4 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to IPMI.
Query: describe CVE-2015-0402
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0402. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel Core - Server BizLogic Script component in Oracle Siebel CRM 8.1.1 and 8.2.2 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via vectors related to Integration - COM.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0117. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. The LDAP Server in IBM Domino 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP6 IF6 and 9.x before 9.0.1 FP3 IF1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, aka SPR KLYH9SLRGM.
Query: exploit Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u81, 6u91, 7u76, and 8u40, and Java FX 2.2.76, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unk
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0491. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u81, 6u91, 7u76, and 8u40, and Java FX 2.2.76, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to 2D, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0459.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4905. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.0. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle MySQL Server 5.6.23 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to affect availability via vectors related to Server : DML.
Query: what is T1195.003
Matching passage: T1195.003 Compromise Hardware Supply Chain. Tactics: initial access. Description: Adversaries may manipulate hardware components in products prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise. By modifying hardware or firmware in the supply chain, adversaries can insert a backdoor into consumer networks that may be difficult to detect and give the adversary a high degree of control over the system. Hardware backdoors may be inserted into various devices, such as servers, workstations, network infrastructure, or peripherals.
Near-miss passage: T1195.002 Compromise Software Supply Chain. Tactics: initial access. Description: Adversaries may manipulate application software prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise. Supply chain compromise of software can take place in a number of ways, including manipulation of the application source code, manipulation of the update/distribution mechanism for that software, or replacing compiled releases with a modified version. Targeting may be specific to a desired victim set or may be distributed to a broad set of consumers but only move on to additional tactics on specific victims.(Citation: Avast CCleaner3 2018)(Citation: Command Five SK 2011)
Query: exploit The s7comm_decode_ud_cpu_szl_subfunc function in epan/dissectors/packet-s7comm_szl_ids.c in the S7COMM dissector in Wireshark 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate the list count in
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8738. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.5. The s7comm_decode_ud_cpu_szl_subfunc function in epan/dissectors/packet-s7comm_szl_ids.c in the S7COMM dissector in Wireshark 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate the list count in an SZL response, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero error and application crash) via a crafted packet.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1102. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.099999904632568. The kernel in Apple iOS before 8.3, Apple OS X before 10.10.3, and Apple TV before 7.2 does not properly handle TCP headers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.
Query: Sigma YAML for jvm / application
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential local file read vulnerability in JVM based apps. If the exceptions are caused due to user input and co. Logsource: jvm / application. Rule: title: Potential Local File Read Vulnerability In JVM Based Application id: e032f5bc-4563-4096-ae3b-064bab588685 status: test description: 'Detects potential local file read vulnerability in JVM based apps. If the exceptions are caused due to user input and contain path traversal payloads then it''s a red flag. ' references: - https://www.wix.engineering/post/threat-and-vulnerability-hunting-with-application-server-error-logs author: Moti Harmats date: 2023-02-11 tags: - attack.initial-access - attack.t1190 logsource: category: application product: jvm definition: 'Requirements: application error logs must be collected (with LOG_LEVEL=ERROR and above)' detection: keywords_local_file_read: '|all': - FileNotFoundException - /../../.. condition: keywords_local_file_read falsepositives: - Application bugs level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects when storage bucket is enumerated in Google Cloud.. Logsource: gcp / gcp.audit. Rule: title: Google Cloud Storage Buckets Enumeration id: e2feb918-4e77-4608-9697-990a1aaf74c3 status: test description: Detects when storage bucket is enumerated in Google Cloud. references: - https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/json_api/v1/buckets author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-08-14 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.discovery logsource: product: gcp service: gcp.audit detection: selection: gcp.audit.method_name: - storage.buckets.list - storage.buckets.listChannels condition: selection falsepositives: - Storage Buckets being enumerated may be performed by a system administrator. Verify whether the user identity, user agent, and/or hostname should be making changes in your environment. - Storage Buckets enumerated from unfamiliar users should be investigated. If known behavior is causing false positives, it can be exempted from the rule. level: low
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Virtual Private Server
Matching passage: T1584.003 Virtual Private Server. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may compromise third-party Virtual Private Servers (VPSs) that can be used during targeting. There exist a variety of cloud service providers that will sell virtual machines/containers as a service. Adversaries may compromise VPSs purchased by third-party entities. By compromising a VPS to use as infrastructure, adversaries can make it difficult to physically tie back operations to themselves.(Citation: NSA NCSC Turla OilRig) Compromising a VPS for use in later stages of the adversary lifecycle, such as Command and Control, can allow adversaries to benefit from the ubiquity and trust associated with higher reputation cloud service providers as well as that added by the compromised third-party.
Near-miss passage: T1584.001 Domains. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may hijack domains and/or subdomains that can be used during targeting. Domain registration hijacking is the act of changing the registration of a domain name without the permission of the original registrant.(Citation: ICANNDomainNameHijacking) Adversaries may gain access to an email account for the person listed as the owner of the domain. The adversary can then claim that they forgot their password in order to make changes to the domain registration. Other possibilities include social engineering a domain registration help desk to gain access to an account, taking advantage of renewal process gaps, or compromising a cloud service that enables managing domains (e.g., AWS Route53).(Citation: Krebs DNS Hijack 2019) Subdomain hijacking can occur when organizations have DNS entries that point to non-existent or deprovisioned resources. In such cases, an adversary may take control of a subdomain to conduct operations with the benefit of the trust associated with that domain.(Citation: Microsoft Sub Takeover 2020) Adversaries who compromise a domain may also engage in domain shadowing by creating malicious subdomains under their control while keeping any existing DNS records. As service will not be disrupted, the malicious subdomains may go unnoticed for long periods of time.(Citation: Palo Alto Unit 42 Domain Shadowing 2022)
Query: SIEM correlation: collection activity consistent with GUI Input Capture
Matching passage: T1056.002 GUI Input Capture. Tactics: collection, credential access. Description: Adversaries may mimic common operating system GUI components to prompt users for credentials with a seemingly legitimate prompt. When programs are executed that need additional privileges than are present in the current user context, it is common for the operating system to prompt the user for proper credentials to authorize the elevated privileges for the task (ex: [Bypass User Account Control](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1548/002)). Adversaries may mimic this functionality to prompt users for credentials with a seemingly legitimate prompt for a number of reasons that mimic normal usage, such as a fake installer requiring additional access or a fake malware removal suite.(Citation: OSX Malware Exploits MacKeeper) This type of prompt can be used to collect credentials via various languages such as [AppleScript](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/002)(Citation: LogRhythm Do You Trust Oct 2014)(Citation: OSX Keydnap malware)(Citation: Spoofing credential dialogs) and [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001).(Citation: LogRhythm Do You Trust Oct 2014)(Citation: Enigma Phishing for Credentials Jan 2015)(Citation: Spoofing credential dialogs) On Linux systems adversaries may launch dialog boxes prompting users for credentials from malicious shell scripts or the command line (i.e. [Unix Shell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/004)).(Citation: Spoofing credential dialogs) Adversaries may also mimic common software authentication requests, such as those from browsers or email clients. This may also be paired with user activity monitoring (i.e., [Browser Information Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1217) and/or [Application Window Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1010)) to spoof prompts when users are naturally accessing sensitive sites/data.
Near-miss passage: T1056 Input Capture. Tactics: collection, credential access. Description: Adversaries may use methods of capturing user input to obtain credentials or collect information. During normal system usage, users often provide credentials to various different locations, such as login pages/portals or system dialog boxes. Input capture mechanisms may be transparent to the user (e.g. [Credential API Hooking](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1056/004)) or rely on deceiving the user into providing input into what they believe to be a genuine service (e.g. [Web Portal Capture](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1056/003)).
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-1676
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1676. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. The kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allow local users to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism via a crafted function call, aka "Microsoft Windows Kernel Memory Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1677, CVE-2015-1678, CVE-2015-1679, and CVE-2015-1680.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8253. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 3.700000047683716. The Frontel protocol before 3 on RSI Video Technologies Videofied devices sets up AES encryption but sends all traffic in cleartext, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive (1) message or (2) MJPEG video data by sniffing the network.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-3126
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3126. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.302 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.203 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.481 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.180, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.180, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 18.0.0.180 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4429.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7393. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.400000095367432. dcoep in BIG-IP LTM, Analytics, APM, ASM, and Link Controller 11.2.0 through 11.6.0 and 12.0.0 before 12.0.0 HF1, BIG-IP AAM 11.4.0 through 11.6.0 and 12.0.0 before 12.0.0 HF1, BIG-IP AFM and PEM 11.3.0 through 11.6.0 and 12.0.0 before 12.0.0 HF1, BIG-IP DNS 12.0.0 before 12.0.0 HF1, BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, and WOM 11.2.0 through 11.3.0, BIG-IP GTM 11.2.0 through 11.6.0, BIG-IP PSM 11.2.0 through 11.4.1, Enterprise Manager 3.0.0 through 3.1.1, BIG-IQ Cloud 4.0.0 through 4.5.0, BIG-IQ Device 4.2.0 through 4.5.0, BIG-IQ Security 4.0.0 through 4.5.0, BIG-IQ ADC 4.5.0, BIG-IQ Centralized Management 4.6.0, and BIG-IQ Cloud and Orchestration 1.0.0 allows local users with advanced shell (bash) access to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.
Query: detect Adversaries may install a root certificate on a compromised system to avoid warnings when connecting to adversary contro in logs
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Adversaries may install a root certificate on a compromised system to avoid warnings when connecting to adversary contro. Logsource: windows / ps_script. Rule: title: Root Certificate Installed - PowerShell id: 42821614-9264-4761-acfc-5772c3286f76 status: test description: Adversaries may install a root certificate on a compromised system to avoid warnings when connecting to adversary controlled web servers. references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1553.004/T1553.004.md author: oscd.community, @redcanary, Zach Stanford @svch0st date: 2020-10-10 modified: 2022-12-02 tags: - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1553.004 logsource: product: windows category: ps_script definition: 'Requirements: Script Block Logging must be enabled' detection: selection1: ScriptBlockText|contains|all: - Move-Item - Cert:\LocalMachine\Root selection2: ScriptBlockText|contains|all: - Import-Certificate - Cert:\LocalMachine\Root condition: 1 of selection* falsepositives: - Help Desk or IT may need to manually add a corporate Root CA on occasion. Need to test if GPO push doesn't trigger FP level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects execution of the binary "wpbbin" which is used as part of the UEFI based persistence method described in the ref. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: UEFI Persistence Via Wpbbin - ProcessCreation id: 4abc0ec4-db5a-412f-9632-26659cddf145 status: test description: Detects execution of the binary "wpbbin" which is used as part of the UEFI based persistence method described in the reference section references: - https://grzegorztworek.medium.com/using-uefi-to-inject-executable-files-into-bitlocker-protected-drives-8ff4ca59c94c - https://persistence-info.github.io/Data/wpbbin.html author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-07-18 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.stealth - attack.t1542.001 logsource: product: windows category: process_creation detection: selection: Image: C:\Windows\System32\wpbbin.exe condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate usage of the file by hardware manufacturer such as lenovo (Thanks @0gtweet for the tip) level: high
Query: detection rule: Detects execution of LiveKD with the "-m" flag to potentially dump the kernel memory
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects execution of LiveKD with the "-m" flag to potentially dump the kernel memory. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Kernel Memory Dump Via LiveKD id: c7746f1c-47d3-43d6-8c45-cd1e54b6b0a2 status: test description: Detects execution of LiveKD with the "-m" flag to potentially dump the kernel memory references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/livekd - https://4sysops.com/archives/creating-a-complete-memory-dump-without-a-blue-screen/ - https://kb.acronis.com/content/60892 author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2023-05-16 modified: 2024-03-13 tags: - attack.stealth logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: - \livekd.exe - \livekd64.exe - OriginalFileName: livekd.exe selection_cli: CommandLine|contains|windash: ' -m' condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unlikely in production environment level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects execution of the "mshta" utility with an argument containing the "http" keyword, which could indicate that an at. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Remotely Hosted HTA File Executed Via Mshta.EXE id: b98d0db6-511d-45de-ad02-e82a98729620 status: test description: Detects execution of the "mshta" utility with an argument containing the "http" keyword, which could indicate that an attacker is executing a remotely hosted malicious hta file references: - https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/22/e/avoslocker-ransomware-variant-abuses-driver-file-to-disable-anti-Virus-scans-log4shell.html author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-08-08 modified: 2023-02-06 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1218.005 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \mshta.exe - OriginalFileName: MSHTA.EXE selection_cli: CommandLine|contains: - http:// - https:// - ftp:// condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: threat report mentioning Query Public AI Services
Matching passage: T1682 Query Public AI Services. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may query publicly accessible artificial intelligence (AI) services, such as large language models (LLMs), to support targeting and operations. In addition to searching websites or databases directly (i.e., [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593)), adversaries may use AI services to synthesize, aggregate, and analyze publicly available information at scale. This may include identifying individuals or organizations to target, researching organizational structures and personnel, identifying technologies used by target organizations, researching business relationships to develop plausible pretexts for [Social Engineering](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1684) approaches, identifying contact information for use in [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) or [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598), or gathering derogatory or sensitive information about individuals that may be used for extortion or coercion.(Citation: MSFT-AI)(Citation: GTIG AI Threat Tracker) Information gathered through AI services may be leveraged for other behaviors, such as establishing operational resources (i.e., [Generate Content](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1683) or [Establish Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1585). For obtaining access to AI tools and services, see [Artificial Intelligence](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588/007).
Near-miss passage: T1596.003 Digital Certificates. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may search public digital certificate data for information about victims that can be used during targeting. Digital certificates are issued by a certificate authority (CA) in order to cryptographically verify the origin of signed content. These certificates, such as those used for encrypted web traffic (HTTPS SSL/TLS communications), contain information about the registered organization such as name and location. Adversaries may search digital certificate data to gather actionable information. Threat actors can use online resources and lookup tools to harvest information about certificates.(Citation: SSLShopper Lookup) Digital certificate data may also be available from artifacts signed by the organization (ex: certificates used from encrypted web traffic are served with content).(Citation: Medium SSL Cert) Information from these sources may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Active Scanning](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1595) or [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Develop Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1587) or [Obtain Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588)), and/or initial access (ex: [External Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1133) or [Trusted Relationship](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1199)).
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-0067
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0067. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6292. CWE: CWE-399. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. The proxy-cache implementation in Cisco AsyncOS 8.0.x before 8.0.7-151, 8.1.x and 8.5.x before 8.5.2-004, 8.6.x and 8.7.x before 8.7.0-171-LD, and 8.8.x before 8.8.0-085 on Web Security Appliance (WSA) devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via multiple proxy connections, aka Bug ID CSCus10922.