alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-7470
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7470. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 7.5. Report Builder in IBM Jazz Reporting Service (JRS) 5.x before 5.0.2-Rational-CLM-ifix011 and 6.0 before 6.0.0-Rational-CLM-ifix005 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by login information.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5576. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.241 and 19.x before 19.0.0.185 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.521 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 19.0.0.190, Adobe AIR SDK before 19.0.0.190, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 19.0.0.190 do not properly restrict discovery of memory addresses, which allows attackers to bypass the ASLR protection mechanism via unspecified vectors.
Query: vulnerability: Malicious file execution vulnerability in Intel Security WebAdvisor before 4.0.2, 4.0.1 and 3.7.2 allows attackers to make the product momentarily vulnerable via executing preexist
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8992. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 7.0. Malicious file execution vulnerability in Intel Security WebAdvisor before 4.0.2, 4.0.1 and 3.7.2 allows attackers to make the product momentarily vulnerable via executing preexisting specifically crafted malware during installation or uninstallation, but not during normal operation.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1248. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The FileSystem API in Google Chrome before 40.0.2214.91 allows remote attackers to bypass the SafeBrowsing for Executable Files protection mechanism by creating a .exe file in a temporary filesystem and then referencing this file with a filesystem:http: URL.
Query: containment actions for Suspicious Install Root Certificate execution detected on endpoint
Matching passage: Playbook for T1553.004 Install Root Certificate. 1) Validate alert telemetry against T1553.004. 2) Scope affected hosts and accounts. 3) Contain by isolating endpoint / disabling account if confirmed. 4) Hunt for related tactics: defense impairment. 5) Eradicate persistence and recover. Reference detection notes: Adversaries may install a root certificate on a compromised system to avoid warnings when connecting to adversary controlled web servers. Root certificates are used in public key cryptography to identify a root certificate authority (CA). When a root certificate is installed, the system or application will trust certificates in the root's chain of trust that have been signed by the root certificat
Near-miss passage: Playbook for T1553.001 Gatekeeper Bypass. Different response path focused on defense impairment.
Query: SOC alert related to Input Injection
Matching passage: T1674 Input Injection. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed, or interacting directly with a GUI-based application. These actions can be preprogrammed into adversary tooling or executed through physical devices such as Human Interface Devices (HIDs). For example, adversaries have used tooling that monitors the Windows message loop to detect when a user visits bank-specific URLs. If detected, the tool then simulates keystrokes to open the developer console or select the address bar, pastes malicious JavaScript from the clipboard, and executes it - enabling manipulation of content within the browser, such as replacing bank account numbers during transactions.(Citation: BleepingComputer BackSwap)(Citation: welivesecurity BackSwap) Adversaries have also used malicious USB devices to emulate keystrokes that launch PowerShell, leading to the download and execution of malware from adversary-controlled servers.(Citation: BleepingComputer USB)
Near-miss passage: T1574.014 AppDomainManager. Tactics: stealth, execution. Description: Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking how the .NET `AppDomainManager` loads assemblies. The .NET framework uses the `AppDomainManager` class to create and manage one or more isolated runtime environments (called application domains) inside a process to host the execution of .NET applications. Assemblies (`.exe` or `.dll` binaries compiled to run as .NET code) may be loaded into an application domain as executable code.(Citation: Microsoft App Domains) Known as "AppDomainManager injection," adversaries may execute arbitrary code by hijacking how .NET applications load assemblies. For example, malware may create a custom application domain inside a target process to load and execute an arbitrary assembly. Alternatively, configuration files (`.config`) or process environment variables that define .NET runtime settings may be tampered with to instruct otherwise benign .NET applications to load a malicious assembly (identified by name) into the target process.(Citation: PenTestLabs AppDomainManagerInject)(Citation: PwC Yellow Liderc)(Citation: Rapid7 AppDomain Manager Injection)
Query: Sigma YAML for windows / process_creation
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the execution of "dctask64.exe", a signed binary by ZOHO Corporation part of ManageEngine Endpoint Central. This. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: ManageEngine Endpoint Central Dctask64.EXE Potential Abuse id: 6345b048-8441-43a7-9bed-541133633d7a status: test description: 'Detects the execution of "dctask64.exe", a signed binary by ZOHO Corporation part of ManageEngine Endpoint Central. This binary can be abused for DLL injection, arbitrary command and process execution. ' references: - https://twitter.com/gN3mes1s/status/1222088214581825540 - https://twitter.com/gN3mes1s/status/1222095963789111296 - https://twitter.com/gN3mes1s/status/1222095371175911424 author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems), Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2020-01-28 modified: 2025-01-22 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth - attack.t1055.001 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \dctask64.exe - Hashes|contains: - IMPHASH=6834B1B94E49701D77CCB3C0895E1AFD - IMPHASH=1BB6F93B129F398C7C4A76BB97450BBA - IMPHASH=FAA2AC19875FADE461C8D89DCF2710A3 - IMPHASH=F1039CED4B91572AB7847D26032E6BBF selection_cli: CommandLine|contains: - ' executecmd64 ' - ' invokeexe ' - ' injectDll ' condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the creation of a schtask via PowerSploit or Empire Default Configuration.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: HackTool - Default PowerSploit/Empire Scheduled Task Creation id: 56c217c3-2de2-479b-990f-5c109ba8458f status: test description: Detects the creation of a schtask via PowerSploit or Empire Default Configuration. references: - https://github.com/0xdeadbeefJERKY/PowerSploit/blob/8690399ef70d2cad10213575ac67e8fa90ddf7c3/Persistence/Persistence.psm1 - https://github.com/EmpireProject/Empire/blob/08cbd274bef78243d7a8ed6443b8364acd1fc48b/lib/modules/powershell/persistence/userland/schtasks.py author: Markus Neis, @Karneades date: 2018-03-06 modified: 2023-03-03 tags: - attack.execution - attack.persistence - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.s0111 - attack.g0022 - attack.g0060 - car.2013-08-001 - attack.t1053.005 - attack.t1059.001 logsource: product: windows category: process_creation detection: selection: ParentImage|endswith: - \powershell.exe - \pwsh.exe Image|endswith: \schtasks.exe CommandLine|contains|all: - /Create - powershell.exe -NonI - /TN Updater /TR CommandLine|contains: - /SC ONLOGON - /SC DAILY /ST - /SC ONIDLE - /SC HOURLY condition: selection falsepositives: - Unlikely level: high
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-3359
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3359. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 3.5. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Room Reservations module before 7.x-1.1 for Drupal allow remote authenticated users with the "Administer the room reservations system" permission to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) node title of a "Room Reservations Category" or (2) body of a "Room Reservations Room" node.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0918. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the administrative backend in Sefrengo before 1.6.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the searchterm parameter to backend/main.php.
Query: describe CVE-2015-8697
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8697. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 5.5. stalin 0.11-5 allows local users to write to arbitrary files.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3155. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 5.0. Foreman before 1.8.1 does not set the secure flag for the _session_id cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-0868
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0868. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in Mrs. Shiromuku Perl CGI shiromuku(bu2)BBS before 2.91 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading an executable file.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4507. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.099999904632568. The SavedStacks class in the JavaScript implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 41.0, when the Debugger API is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (getSlotRef assertion failure and application exit) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site.
Query: risk of scripts/xzgrep.in in xzgrep 5.2.x before 5.2.0, before 5.0.0 does not properly process file names containing semicolons, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4035. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. scripts/xzgrep.in in xzgrep 5.2.x before 5.2.0, before 5.0.0 does not properly process file names containing semicolons, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by having a user run xzgrep on a crafted file name.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8019. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. The skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec function in net/core/datagram.c in the Linux kernel 3.14.54 and 3.18.22 does not accept a length argument, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a write system call followed by a recvmsg system call.
Query: vulnerability: Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.261 and 19.x before 19.0.0.245 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.548 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 19.0.0.241, A
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7657. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.261 and 19.x before 19.0.0.245 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.548 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 19.0.0.241, Adobe AIR SDK before 19.0.0.241, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 19.0.0.241 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted actionCallMethod arguments, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7651, CVE-2015-7652, CVE-2015-7653, CVE-2015-7654, CVE-2015-7655, CVE-2015-7656, CVE-2015-7658, CVE-2015-7660, CVE-2015-7661, CVE-2015-7663, CVE-2015-8042, CVE-2015-8043, CVE-2015-8044, and CVE-2015-8046.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4492. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. Use-after-free vulnerability in the XMLHttpRequest::Open implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 40.0 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.2 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a SharedWorker object that makes recursive calls to the open method of an XMLHttpRequest object.
Query: vulnerability: Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8412. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, and CVE-2015-8454.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1218. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. Multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities in the DOM implementation in Blink, as used in Google Chrome before 41.0.2272.76, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via vectors that trigger movement of a SCRIPT element to different documents, related to (1) the HTMLScriptElement::didMoveToNewDocument function in core/html/HTMLScriptElement.cpp and (2) the SVGScriptElement::didMoveToNewDocument function in core/svg/SVGScriptElement.cpp.
Query: secure coding against Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code
Matching passage: CWE-215 Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code. The product inserts sensitive information into debugging code, which could expose this information if the debugging code is not disabled in production.
Near-miss passage: CWE-1051 Initialization with Hard-Coded Network Resource Configuration Data. The product initializes data using hard-coded values that act as network resource identifiers.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-7382
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7382. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.5. SQL injection vulnerability in install.php in Web Reference Database (aka refbase) through 0.9.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the defaultCharacterSet parameter, a different issue than CVE-2015-6009.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6009. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.5. Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Web Reference Database (aka refbase) through 0.9.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) the where parameter to rss.php or (2) the sqlQuery parameter to search.php, a different issue than CVE-2015-7382.
Query: what is T1553.006
Matching passage: T1553.006 Code Signing Policy Modification. Tactics: defense impairment. Description: Adversaries may modify code signing policies to enable execution of unsigned or self-signed code. Code signing provides a level of authenticity on a program from a developer and a guarantee that the program has not been tampered with. Security controls can include enforcement mechanisms to ensure that only valid, signed code can be run on an operating system. Some of these security controls may be enabled by default, such as Driver Signature Enforcement (DSE) on Windows or System Integrity Protection (SIP) on macOS.(Citation: Microsoft DSE June 2017)(Citation: Apple Disable SIP) Other such controls may be disabled by default but are configurable through application controls, such as only allowing signed Dynamic-Link Libraries (DLLs) to execute on a system. Since it can be useful for developers to modify default signature enforcement policies during the development and testing of applications, disabling of these features may be possible with elevated permissions.(Citation: Microsoft Unsigned Driver Apr 2017)(Citation: Apple Disable SIP) Adversaries may modify code signing policies in a number of ways, including through use of command-line or GUI utilities, [Modify Registry](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1112), rebooting the computer in a debug/recovery mode, or by altering the value of variables in kernel memory.(Citation: Microsoft TESTSIGNING Feb 2021)(Citation: Apple Disable SIP)(Citation: FireEye HIKIT Rootkit Part 2)(Citation: GitHub Turla Driver Loader) Examples of commands that can modify the code signing policy of a system include <code>bcdedit.exe -set TESTSIGNING ON</code> on Windows and <code>csrutil disable</code> on macOS.(Citation: Microsoft TESTSIGNING Feb 2021)(Citation: Apple Disable SIP) Depending on the implementation, successful modification of a signing policy may require reboot of the compromised system. Additionally, some implementations can introduce visible artifacts for the user (ex: a watermark in the corner of the screen stating the
Near-miss passage: T1553.002 Code Signing. Tactics: defense impairment. Description: Adversaries may create, acquire, or steal code signing materials to sign their malware or tools. Code signing provides a level of authenticity on a binary from the developer and a guarantee that the binary has not been tampered with. (Citation: Wikipedia Code Signing) The certificates used during an operation may be created, acquired, or stolen by the adversary. (Citation: Securelist Digital Certificates) (Citation: Symantec Digital Certificates) Unlike [Invalid Code Signature](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1036/001), this activity will result in a valid signature. Code signing to verify software on first run can be used on modern Windows and macOS systems. It is not used on Linux due to the decentralized nature of the platform. (Citation: Wikipedia Code Signing)(Citation: EclecticLightChecksonEXECodeSigning) Code signing certificates may be used to bypass security policies that require signed code to execute on a system.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-6337
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6337. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Enterprise Module (APIC-EM) 1.0.10 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted hostname in an SNMP response, aka Bug ID CSCuw47238.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4665. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ajax_cmd.php in Xceedium Xsuite 2.4.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the fileName parameter.
Query: CWE for Missing Check for Certificate Revocation after Initial Check
Matching passage: CWE-370 Missing Check for Certificate Revocation after Initial Check. The product does not check the revocation status of a certificate after its initial revocation check, which can cause the product to perform privileged actions even after the certificate is revoked at a later time.
Near-miss passage: CWE-277 Insecure Inherited Permissions. A product defines a set of insecure permissions that are inherited by objects that are created by the program.
Query: describe CVE-2015-2367
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2367. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. win32k.sys in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2 and R2 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows local users to obtain sensitive information from uninitialized kernel memory via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6551. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.900000095367432. Veritas NetBackup 7.x through 7.5.0.7 and 7.6.0.x through 7.6.0.4 and NetBackup Appliance through 2.5.4 and 2.6.0.x through 2.6.0.4 do not use TLS for administration-console traffic to the NBU server, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network for key-exchange packets.
Query: exploit The mtouch-quiz plugin before 3.1.3 for WordPress has XSS via the quiz parameter during a Quiz Manage operation.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9386. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. The mtouch-quiz plugin before 3.1.3 for WordPress has XSS via the quiz parameter during a Quiz Manage operation.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0892. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Maroyaka CGI Maroyaka Image Album allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Query: Outbound C2 pattern associated with Log Enumeration
Matching passage: T1654 Log Enumeration. Tactics: discovery. Description: Adversaries may enumerate system and service logs to find useful data. These logs may highlight various types of valuable insights for an adversary, such as user authentication records ([Account Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1087)), security or vulnerable software ([Software Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1518)), or hosts within a compromised network ([Remote System Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1018)). Host binaries may be leveraged to collect system logs. Examples include using `wevtutil.exe` or [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) on Windows to access and/or export security event information.(Citation: WithSecure Lazarus-NoPineapple Threat Intel Report 2023)(Citation: Cadet Blizzard emerges as novel threat actor) In cloud environments, adversaries may leverage utilities such as the Azure VM Agent’s `CollectGuestLogs.exe` to collect security logs from cloud hosted infrastructure.(Citation: SIM Swapping and Abuse of the Microsoft Azure Serial Console) Adversaries may also target centralized logging infrastructure such as SIEMs. Logs may also be bulk exported and sent to adversary-controlled infrastructure for offline analysis. In addition to gaining a better understanding of the environment, adversaries may also monitor logs in real time to track incident response procedures. This may allow them to adjust their techniques in order to maintain persistence or evade defenses.(Citation: Permiso GUI-Vil 2023)
Near-miss passage: T1069.002 Domain Groups. Tactics: discovery. Description: Adversaries may attempt to find domain-level groups and permission settings. The knowledge of domain-level permission groups can help adversaries determine which groups exist and which users belong to a particular group. Adversaries may use this information to determine which users have elevated permissions, such as domain administrators. Commands such as <code>net group /domain</code> of the [Net](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0039) utility, <code>dscacheutil -q group</code> on macOS, and <code>ldapsearch</code> on Linux can list domain-level groups.
Query: risk of The PlugNedit Adaptive Editor plugin before 6.2.0 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=simple_fields_field_type_post_dialog_load plugnedit_w
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9422. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.5. The PlugNedit Adaptive Editor plugin before 6.2.0 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=simple_fields_field_type_post_dialog_load plugnedit_width, pnemedcount, PlugneditBGColor, PlugneditEditorMargin, or plugneditcontent parameters.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1391. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 8.800000190734863. Aruba AirWave before 8.0.7 allows bypass of a CSRF protection mechanism.