alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: vulnerability: The "Project Documentation" feature in MantisBT 1.2.19 and earlier, when the threshold to access files ($g_view_proj_doc_threshold) is set to ANYBODY, allows remote authenticated u
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5059. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.300000190734863. The "Project Documentation" feature in MantisBT 1.2.19 and earlier, when the threshold to access files ($g_view_proj_doc_threshold) is set to ANYBODY, allows remote authenticated users to download attachments linked to arbitrary private projects via a file id number in the file_id parameter to file_download.php.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8559. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 7.5. The knife bootstrap command in chef Infra client before version 15.4.45 leaks the validator.pem private RSA key to /var/log/messages.
Query: write Sigma for Detects suspicious process related to rundll32 based on command line that invokes inline VBScript as seen being used by
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects suspicious process related to rundll32 based on command line that invokes inline VBScript as seen being used by. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Suspicious Rundll32 Invoking Inline VBScript id: 1cc50f3f-1fc8-4acf-b2e9-6f172e1fdebd status: test description: Detects suspicious process related to rundll32 based on command line that invokes inline VBScript as seen being used by UNC2452 references: - https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2021/03/04/goldmax-goldfinder-sibot-analyzing-nobelium-malware/ author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-03-05 modified: 2022-10-09 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth - attack.t1055 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: CommandLine|contains|all: - rundll32.exe - Execute - RegRead - window.close condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects process connections to a Monero crypto mining pool. Logsource: linux / network_connection. Rule: title: Linux Crypto Mining Pool Connections id: a46c93b7-55ed-4d27-a41b-c259456c4746 status: stable description: Detects process connections to a Monero crypto mining pool references: - https://www.poolwatch.io/coin/monero author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-10-26 tags: - attack.impact - attack.t1496 logsource: product: linux category: network_connection detection: selection: DestinationHostname: - pool.minexmr.com - fr.minexmr.com - de.minexmr.com - sg.minexmr.com - ca.minexmr.com - us-west.minexmr.com - pool.supportxmr.com - mine.c3pool.com - xmr-eu1.nanopool.org - xmr-eu2.nanopool.org - xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org - xmr-us-west1.nanopool.org - xmr-asia1.nanopool.org - xmr-jp1.nanopool.org - xmr-au1.nanopool.org - xmr.2miners.com - xmr.hashcity.org - xmr.f2pool.com - xmrpool.eu - pool.hashvault.pro - moneroocean.stream - monerocean.stream condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate use of crypto miners level: high
Query: Sigma rule for Detects locked workstation session events that occur automatically after a standard period of inactivity.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects locked workstation session events that occur automatically after a standard period of inactivity.. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: Locked Workstation id: 411742ad-89b0-49cb-a7b0-3971b5c1e0a4 status: stable description: Detects locked workstation session events that occur automatically after a standard period of inactivity. references: - https://www.cisecurity.org/controls/cis-controls-list/ - https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/PCI_DSS_v3-2-1.pdf - https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.04162018.pdf - https://www.ultimatewindowssecurity.com/securitylog/encyclopedia/event.aspx?eventID=4800 author: Alexandr Yampolskyi, SOC Prime date: 2019-03-26 modified: 2023-12-11 tags: - attack.impact logsource: product: windows service: security detection: selection: EventID: 4800 condition: selection falsepositives: - Likely level: informational
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential DLL sideloading using the Microsoft Office winword process via the '/l' flag.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Arbitrary DLL Load Using Winword id: f7375e28-5c14-432f-b8d1-1db26c832df3 related: - id: 2621b3a6-3840-4810-ac14-a02426086171 type: obsolete status: test description: Detects potential DLL sideloading using the Microsoft Office winword process via the '/l' flag. references: - https://github.com/D4Vinci/One-Lin3r/blob/9fdfa5f0b9c698dfbd4cdfe7d2473192777ae1c6/one_lin3r/core/liners/windows/cmd/dll_loader_word.py author: Victor Sergeev, oscd.community date: 2020-10-09 modified: 2023-03-29 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1202 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \WINWORD.exe - OriginalFileName: WinWord.exe selection_dll: CommandLine|contains|all: - '/l ' - .dll condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Query: common weakness: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in an Environment Variable
Matching passage: CWE-526 Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in an Environment Variable. The product uses an environment variable to store unencrypted sensitive information.
Near-miss passage: CWE-350 Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action. The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.
Query: mitigate Commonly Used Port
Matching passage: T1043 Commonly Used Port. Tactics: command and control. Description: **This technique has been deprecated. Please use [Non-Standard Port](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1571) where appropriate.** Adversaries may communicate over a commonly used port to bypass firewalls or network detection systems and to blend with normal network activity to avoid more detailed inspection. They may use commonly open ports such as * TCP:80 (HTTP) * TCP:443 (HTTPS) * TCP:25 (SMTP) * TCP/UDP:53 (DNS) They may use the protocol associated with the port or a completely different protocol. For connections that occur internally within an enclave (such as those between a proxy or pivot node and other nodes), examples of common ports are * TCP/UDP:135 (RPC) * TCP/UDP:22 (SSH) * TCP/UDP:3389 (RDP)
Near-miss passage: T1026 Multiband Communication. Tactics: command and control. Description: **This technique has been deprecated and should no longer be used.** Some adversaries may split communications between different protocols. There could be one protocol for inbound command and control and another for outbound data, allowing it to bypass certain firewall restrictions. The split could also be random to simply avoid data threshold alerts on any one communication.
Query: exploit Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in upload/scp/tickets.php in osTicket before 1.9.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the status parameter 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1176. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in upload/scp/tickets.php in osTicket before 1.9.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the status parameter in a search action.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7878. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 5.400000095367432. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Taxonomy Find module 6.x-2.x through 6.x-1.2 and 7.x-2.x through 7.x-1.0 in Drupal allows remote authenticated users with certain permissions to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via taxonomy vocabulary and term names.
Query: write Sigma for Detects potential suspicious behaviour using secedit.exe. Such as exporting or modifying the security policy
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential suspicious behaviour using secedit.exe. Such as exporting or modifying the security policy. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Suspicious Activity Using SeCEdit id: c2c76b77-32be-4d1f-82c9-7e544bdfe0eb status: test description: Detects potential suspicious behaviour using secedit.exe. Such as exporting or modifying the security policy references: - https://blueteamops.medium.com/secedit-and-i-know-it-595056dee53d - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/secedit author: Janantha Marasinghe date: 2022-11-18 modified: 2022-12-30 tags: - attack.collection - attack.discovery - attack.persistence - attack.credential-access - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1685.001 - attack.t1547.001 - attack.t1505.005 - attack.t1556.002 - attack.t1685 - attack.t1574.007 - attack.t1564.002 - attack.t1546.008 - attack.t1546.007 - attack.t1547.014 - attack.t1547.010 - attack.t1547.002 - attack.t1557 - attack.t1082 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \secedit.exe - OriginalFileName: SeCEdit selection_flags_discovery: CommandLine|contains|all: - /export - /cfg selection_flags_configure: CommandLine|contains|all: - /configure - /db condition: selection_img and (1 of selection_flags_*) falsepositives: - Legitimate administrative use level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects a "winlogon.exe" process that initiate network communications with public IP addresses. Logsource: windows / network_connection. Rule: title: Outbound Network Connection To Public IP Via Winlogon id: 7610a4ea-c06d-495f-a2ac-0a696abcfd3b status: test description: Detects a "winlogon.exe" process that initiate network communications with public IP addresses references: - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2023/04/11/guidance-for-investigating-attacks-using-cve-2022-21894-the-blacklotus-campaign/ author: Christopher Peacock @securepeacock, SCYTHE @scythe_io date: 2023-04-28 modified: 2024-03-12 tags: - attack.execution - attack.command-and-control - attack.stealth - attack.t1218.011 logsource: category: network_connection product: windows detection: selection: Image|endswith: \winlogon.exe Initiated: 'true' filter_main_local_ranges: DestinationIp|cidr: - 127.0.0.0/8 - 10.0.0.0/8 - 172.16.0.0/12 - 192.168.0.0/16 - 169.254.0.0/16 - ::1/128 - fe80::/10 - fc00::/7 condition: selection and not 1 of filter_main_* falsepositives: - Communication to other corporate systems that use IP addresses from public address spaces level: medium
Query: risk of F5 BIG-IP LTM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, Link Controller, and PEM 11.3.x, 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8099. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.900000095367432. F5 BIG-IP LTM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, Link Controller, and PEM 11.3.x, 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP AAM 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP DNS 12.x before 12.0.0 HF1; BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, and WOM 11.3.0; BIG-IP GTM 11.3.x, 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1; BIG-IP PSM 11.3.x and 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10; Enterprise Manager 3.0.0 through 3.1.1; BIG-IQ Cloud and BIG-IQ Security 4.0.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Device 4.2.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ ADC 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Centralized Management 4.6.0; and BIG-IQ Cloud and Orchestration 1.0.0 on the 3900, 6900, 8900, 8950, 11000, 11050, PB100 and PB200 platforms, when software SYN cookies are configured on virtual servers, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (High-Speed Bridge hang) via an invalid TCP segment.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5230. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.5. The DNS packet parsing/generation code in PowerDNS (aka pdns) Authoritative Server 3.4.x before 3.4.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted query packets.
Query: ATT&CK technique for Tool
Matching passage: T1588.002 Tool. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may buy, steal, or download software tools that can be used during targeting. Tools can be open or closed source, free or commercial. A tool can be used for malicious purposes by an adversary, but (unlike malware) were not intended to be used for those purposes (ex: [PsExec](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0029)). Adversaries may obtain tools to support their operations, including to support execution of post-compromise behaviors. Tools may also be leveraged for testing – for example, evaluating malware against commercial antivirus or endpoint detection and response (EDR) applications.(Citation: Forescout Conti Leaks 2022)(Citation: Sentinel Labs Top Tier Target 2025) Tool acquisition may involve the procurement of commercial software licenses, including for red teaming tools such as Cobalt Strike. In addition to freely downloading or purchasing software, adversaries may steal software and/or software licenses from third-party entities (including other adversaries). Threat actors may also crack trial versions of software.(Citation: Recorded Future Beacon 2019)
Near-miss passage: T1588.003 Code Signing Certificates. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may buy and/or steal code signing certificates that can be used during targeting. Code signing is the process of digitally signing executables and scripts to confirm the software author and guarantee that the code has not been altered or corrupted. Code signing provides a level of authenticity for a program from the developer and a guarantee that the program has not been tampered with.(Citation: Wikipedia Code Signing) Users and/or security tools may trust a signed piece of code more than an unsigned piece of code even if they don't know who issued the certificate or who the author is. Prior to [Code Signing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1553/002), adversaries may purchase or steal code signing certificates for use in operations. The purchase of code signing certificates may be done using a front organization or using information stolen from a previously compromised entity that allows the adversary to validate to a certificate provider as that entity. Adversaries may also steal code signing materials directly from a compromised third-party.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-2293
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2293. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin/class-bulk-editor-list-table.php in the WordPress SEO by Yoast plugin before 1.5.7, 1.6.x before 1.6.4, and 1.7.x before 1.7.4 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of certain users for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the (1) order_by or (2) order parameter in the wpseo_bulk-editor page.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4586. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alcatel-Lucent CellPipe 7130 RG 5Ae.M2013 HOL with firmware 1.0.0.20h.HOL allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a user account via an add_user action in a request to password.cmd.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-7245
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7245. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 7.5. Directory traversal vulnerability in D-Link DVG-N5402SP with firmware W1000CN-00, W1000CN-03, or W2000EN-00 allows remote attackers to read sensitive information via a .. (dot dot) in the errorpage parameter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0878. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 5.800000190734863. Directory traversal vulnerability in CREAR AL-Mail32 before 1.13d allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a crafted filename of an attachment.
Query: risk of Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sample feedback.inc file in VASCO DIGIPASS authentication plug-in for Citrix Web Interface allows remote attackers to inject arbitra
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7349. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sample feedback.inc file in VASCO DIGIPASS authentication plug-in for Citrix Web Interface allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the failmessage parameter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5520. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Users module in Orchard 1.7.3 through 1.8.2 and 1.9.x before 1.9.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the username when creating a new user account, which is not properly handled when deleting an account.
Query: vulnerability: Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel UI Framework component in Oracle Siebel CRM 8.1.1 and 8.2.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0417. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.0. Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel UI Framework component in Oracle Siebel CRM 8.1.1 and 8.2.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Portal Framework, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0388.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2014. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 5.800000190734863. Open redirect vulnerability in the web server in IBM Domino 8.5 before 8.5.3 FP6 IF9 and 9.0 before 9.0.1 FP4 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted URL, aka SPR SJAR9DNGDA.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-8240
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8240. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 7.5. The Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) in F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, GTM, Link Controller, and BIG-IP PEM before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4, and 11.6.x before 11.6.0 HF6 and BIG-IP PSM before 11.4.1 HF10 does not properly handle TCP options, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors, related to the tm.minpathmtu database variable.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9166. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 7.5. In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear IPQ4019, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, and SD 850, DRM provisioning mechanisms used in QSEE applications have a feature to prevent further provisioning. This is done by creating an SFS file called 'finalize_prov_flag.data' at the end of provisioning. When this feature is enabled, provisioning calls check for the existence of the file in order to decide whether to do provisioning or not. Current implementation allows provisioning without sufficient checks.
Query: detect Adversaries may enumerate browser bookmarks to learn more about compromised hosts. Browser bookmarks may reveal personal in logs
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Adversaries may enumerate browser bookmarks to learn more about compromised hosts. Browser bookmarks may reveal personal. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Suspicious Where Execution id: 725a9768-0f5e-4cb3-aec2-bc5719c6831a status: test description: 'Adversaries may enumerate browser bookmarks to learn more about compromised hosts. Browser bookmarks may reveal personal information about users (ex: banking sites, interests, social media, etc.) as well as details about internal network resources such as servers, tools/dashboards, or other related infrastructure. ' references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1217/T1217.md author: frack113, Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-12-13 modified: 2022-06-29 tags: - attack.discovery - attack.t1217 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: where_exe: - Image|endswith: \where.exe - OriginalFileName: where.exe where_opt: CommandLine|contains: - places.sqlite - cookies.sqlite - formhistory.sqlite - logins.json - key4.db - key3.db - sessionstore.jsonlz4 - History - Bookmarks - Cookies - Login Data condition: all of where_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: low
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detect when users are authenticating without MFA being required.. Logsource: azure / signinlogs. Rule: title: Azure AD Only Single Factor Authentication Required id: 28eea407-28d7-4e42-b0be-575d5ba60b2c status: test description: Detect when users are authenticating without MFA being required. references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/entra/architecture/security-operations-user-accounts author: MikeDuddington, '@dudders1' date: 2022-07-27 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.persistence - attack.initial-access - attack.credential-access - attack.stealth - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1078.004 - attack.t1556.006 logsource: product: azure service: signinlogs detection: selection: Status: Success AuthenticationRequirement: singleFactorAuthentication condition: selection falsepositives: - If this was approved by System Administrator. level: low
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Transfer Data to Cloud Account
Matching passage: T1537 Transfer Data to Cloud Account. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may exfiltrate data by transferring the data, including through sharing/syncing and creating backups of cloud environments, to another cloud account they control on the same service. A defender who is monitoring for large transfers to outside the cloud environment through normal file transfers or over command and control channels may not be watching for data transfers to another account within the same cloud provider. Such transfers may utilize existing cloud provider APIs and the internal address space of the cloud provider to blend into normal traffic or avoid data transfers over external network interfaces.(Citation: TLDRSec AWS Attacks) Adversaries may also use cloud-native mechanisms to share victim data with adversary-controlled cloud accounts, such as creating anonymous file sharing links or, in Azure, a shared access signature (SAS) URI.(Citation: Microsoft Azure Storage Shared Access Signature) Incidents have been observed where adversaries have created backups of cloud instances and transferred them to separate accounts.(Citation: DOJ GRU Indictment Jul 2018)
Near-miss passage: T1567.001 Exfiltration to Code Repository. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a code repository rather than over their primary command and control channel. Code repositories are often accessible via an API (ex: https://api.github.com). Access to these APIs are often over HTTPS, which gives the adversary an additional level of protection. Exfiltration to a code repository can also provide a significant amount of cover to the adversary if it is a popular service already used by hosts within the network.