alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: vulnerability: The integrated management service on Siemens Ruggedcom WIN51xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN52xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN70xx devices with 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1448. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 10.0. The integrated management service on Siemens Ruggedcom WIN51xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN52xx devices with firmware before SS4.4.4624.35, WIN70xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32, and WIN72xx devices with firmware before BS4.4.4621.32 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and perform administrative actions via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4161. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 7.5. SAP Afaria does not properly restrict access to unspecified functionality, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, gain privileges, or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, SAP Security Note 2155690.
Query: secure coding against Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
Matching passage: CWE-93 Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection'). The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs.
Near-miss passage: CWE-527 Exposure of Version-Control Repository to an Unauthorized Control Sphere. The product stores a CVS, git, or other repository in a directory, archive, or other resource that is stored, transferred, or otherwise made accessible to unauthorized actors.
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution
Matching passage: T1127 Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution. Tactics: stealth, execution. Description: Adversaries may take advantage of trusted developer utilities to proxy execution of malicious payloads. There are many utilities used for software development related tasks that can be used to execute code in various forms to assist in development, debugging, and reverse engineering.(Citation: engima0x3 DNX Bypass)(Citation: engima0x3 RCSI Bypass)(Citation: Exploit Monday WinDbg)(Citation: LOLBAS Tracker) These utilities may often be signed with legitimate certificates that allow them to execute on a system and proxy execution of malicious code through a trusted process that effectively bypasses application control solutions. Smart App Control is a feature of Windows that blocks applications it considers potentially malicious from running by verifying unsigned applications against a known safe list from a Microsoft cloud service before executing them.(Citation: Microsoft Smart App Control) However, adversaries may leverage "reputation hijacking" to abuse an operating system’s trust of safe, signed applications that support the execution of arbitrary code. By leveraging [Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1127) to run their malicious code, adversaries may bypass Smart App Control protections.(Citation: Elastic Security Labs)
Near-miss passage: T1127.001 MSBuild. Tactics: stealth, execution. Description: Adversaries may use MSBuild to proxy execution of code through a trusted Windows utility. MSBuild.exe (Microsoft Build Engine) is a software build platform used by Visual Studio. It handles XML formatted project files that define requirements for loading and building various platforms and configurations.(Citation: MSDN MSBuild) Adversaries can abuse MSBuild to proxy execution of malicious code. The inline task capability of MSBuild that was introduced in .NET version 4 allows for C# or Visual Basic code to be inserted into an XML project file.(Citation: MSDN MSBuild)(Citation: Microsoft MSBuild Inline Tasks 2017) MSBuild will compile and execute the inline task. MSBuild.exe is a signed Microsoft binary, so when it is used this way it can execute arbitrary code and bypass application control defenses that are configured to allow MSBuild.exe execution.(Citation: LOLBAS Msbuild)
Query: Sigma rule for Detects a suspicious process spawning from an Outlook process.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects a suspicious process spawning from an Outlook process.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Suspicious Outlook Child Process id: 208748f7-881d-47ac-a29c-07ea84bf691d related: - id: 438025f9-5856-4663-83f7-52f878a70a50 type: derived - id: e212d415-0e93-435f-9e1a-f29005bb4723 type: derived status: test description: Detects a suspicious process spawning from an Outlook process. references: - https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/465aabe132ccb949e75b8ab9c5bda36d80cf2fd503d52b8bad54e295f28bbc21?environmentId=100 - https://mgreen27.github.io/posts/2018/04/02/DownloadCradle.html author: Michael Haag, Florian Roth (Nextron Systems), Markus Neis, Elastic, FPT.EagleEye Team date: 2022-02-28 modified: 2023-02-04 tags: - attack.execution - attack.t1204.002 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: ParentImage|endswith: \OUTLOOK.EXE Image|endswith: - \AppVLP.exe - \bash.exe - \cmd.exe - \cscript.exe - \forfiles.exe - \hh.exe - \mftrace.exe - \msbuild.exe - \msdt.exe - \mshta.exe - \msiexec.exe - \powershell.exe - \pwsh.exe - \regsvr32.exe - \schtasks.exe - \scrcons.exe - \scriptrunner.exe - \sh.exe - \svchost.exe - \wmic.exe - \wscript.exe condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the use of Inveigh a cross-platform .NET IPv4/IPv6 machine-in-the-middle tool. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: HackTool - Inveigh Execution id: b99a1518-1ad5-4f65-bc95-1ffff97a8fd0 status: test description: Detects the use of Inveigh a cross-platform .NET IPv4/IPv6 machine-in-the-middle tool references: - https://github.com/Kevin-Robertson/Inveigh - https://thedfirreport.com/2020/11/23/pysa-mespinoza-ransomware/ author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-10-24 modified: 2023-02-04 tags: - attack.credential-access - attack.t1003.001 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: - Image|endswith: \Inveigh.exe - OriginalFileName: - \Inveigh.exe - \Inveigh.dll - Description: Inveigh - CommandLine|contains: - ' -SpooferIP' - ' -ReplyToIPs ' - ' -ReplyToDomains ' - ' -ReplyToMACs ' - ' -SnifferIP' condition: selection falsepositives: - Very unlikely level: critical
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-5625
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5625. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in OpenDocMan before 1.3.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the redirection parameter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5326. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the slave overview page in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote authenticated users with certain permissions to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the slave offline status message.
Query: risk of Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8421. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8424, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, and CVE-2015-8454.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8424. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.268 and 19.x and 20.x before 20.0.0.228 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.554 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 20.0.0.204, Adobe AIR SDK before 20.0.0.204, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 20.0.0.204 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8048, CVE-2015-8049, CVE-2015-8050, CVE-2015-8055, CVE-2015-8056, CVE-2015-8057, CVE-2015-8058, CVE-2015-8059, CVE-2015-8061, CVE-2015-8062, CVE-2015-8063, CVE-2015-8064, CVE-2015-8065, CVE-2015-8066, CVE-2015-8067, CVE-2015-8068, CVE-2015-8069, CVE-2015-8070, CVE-2015-8071, CVE-2015-8401, CVE-2015-8402, CVE-2015-8403, CVE-2015-8404, CVE-2015-8405, CVE-2015-8406, CVE-2015-8410, CVE-2015-8411, CVE-2015-8412, CVE-2015-8413, CVE-2015-8414, CVE-2015-8420, CVE-2015-8421, CVE-2015-8422, CVE-2015-8423, CVE-2015-8425, CVE-2015-8426, CVE-2015-8427, CVE-2015-8428, CVE-2015-8429, CVE-2015-8430, CVE-2015-8431, CVE-2015-8432, CVE-2015-8433, CVE-2015-8434, CVE-2015-8435, CVE-2015-8436, CVE-2015-8437, CVE-2015-8441, CVE-2015-8442, CVE-2015-8447, CVE-2015-8448, CVE-2015-8449, CVE-2015-8450, CVE-2015-8452, and CVE-2015-8454.
Query: describe CVE-2015-3763
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3763. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Safari in Apple iOS before 8.4.1 does not limit the rate of JavaScript alert messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (apparent browser locking) via a crafted web site.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2190. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 5.0. epan/proto.c in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.4 does not properly handle integer data types greater than 32 bits in size, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) via a crafted packet that is improperly handled by the LLDP dissector.
Query: describe CVE-2015-0492
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0492. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u76 and 8u40, and JavaFX 2.2.76, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0484.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2789. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.400000095367432. Unquoted Windows search path vulnerability in the Foxit Cloud Safe Update Service in the Cloud plugin in Foxit Reader 6.1 through 7.0.6.1126 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse program in the %SYSTEMDRIVE% folder.
Query: SOC runbook when seeing Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Office Test
Matching passage: Playbook for T1137.002 Office Test. 1) Validate alert telemetry against T1137.002. 2) Scope affected hosts and accounts. 3) Contain by isolating endpoint / disabling account if confirmed. 4) Hunt for related tactics: persistence. 5) Eradicate persistence and recover. Reference detection notes: Adversaries may abuse the Microsoft Office "Office Test" Registry key to obtain persistence on a compromised system. An Office Test Registry location exists that allows a user to specify an arbitrary DLL that will be executed every time an Office application is started. This Registry key is thought to be used by Microsoft to load DLLs for testing and debugging purposes while developing Office appl
Near-miss passage: Playbook for T1137.003 Outlook Forms. Different response path focused on persistence.
Query: exploit Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the CMSJunkie J-ClassifiedsManager component for Joomla! allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the view par
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1478. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the CMSJunkie J-ClassifiedsManager component for Joomla! allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the view parameter to /classifieds.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-10074. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. A vulnerability was found in OpenSeaMap online_chart 1.2. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is the function init of the file index.php. The manipulation of the argument mtext leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version staging is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 8649157158f921590d650e2d2f4bdf0df1017e9d. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-220218 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-4961
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4961. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.5999999046325684. IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience 8.x before 8.7.1.8847 FP10, 8.8.x before 8.8.0.9049 FP9, 9.0.0 and 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1117 FP5, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5108 FP5, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1223 FP3, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5224 FP3 does not encrypt connections between internal servers, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network for HTTP traffic.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1729. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 allows remote attackers to read content from a different (1) domain or (2) zone via a crafted web site, aka "Internet Explorer Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-5094
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5094. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.15 and 11.x before 11.0.12, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30060, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.008.20082 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-3095, CVE-2015-5087, CVE-2015-5100, CVE-2015-5102, CVE-2015-5103, CVE-2015-5104, and CVE-2015-5115.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1768. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. win32k.sys in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2 and R2 SP2 allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Memory Corruption Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."
Query: explain T1185 Browser Session Hijacking
Matching passage: T1185 Browser Session Hijacking. Tactics: collection. Description: Adversaries may take advantage of security vulnerabilities and inherent functionality in browser software to change content, modify user-behaviors, and intercept information as part of various browser session hijacking techniques.(Citation: Wikipedia Man in the Browser) A specific example is when an adversary injects software into a browser that allows them to inherit cookies, HTTP sessions, and SSL client certificates of a user then use the browser as a way to pivot into an authenticated intranet.(Citation: Cobalt Strike Browser Pivot)(Citation: ICEBRG Chrome Extensions) Executing browser-based behaviors such as pivoting may require specific process permissions, such as <code>SeDebugPrivilege</code> and/or high-integrity/administrator rights. Another example involves pivoting browser traffic from the adversary's browser through the user's browser by setting up a proxy which will redirect web traffic. This does not alter the user's traffic in any way, and the proxy connection can be severed as soon as the browser is closed. The adversary assumes the security context of whichever browser process the proxy is injected into. Browsers typically create a new process for each tab that is opened and permissions and certificates are separated accordingly. With these permissions, an adversary could potentially browse to any resource on an intranet, such as [Sharepoint](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1213/002) or webmail, that is accessible through the browser and which the browser has sufficient permissions. Browser pivoting may also bypass security provided by 2-factor authentication.(Citation: cobaltstrike manual)
Near-miss passage: T1074.002 Remote Data Staging. Tactics: collection. Description: Adversaries may stage data collected from multiple systems in a central location or directory on one system prior to Exfiltration. Data may be kept in separate files or combined into one file through techniques such as [Archive Collected Data](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1560). Interactive command shells may be used, and common functionality within [cmd](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0106) and bash may be used to copy data into a staging location. In cloud environments, adversaries may stage data within a particular instance or virtual machine before exfiltration. An adversary may [Create Cloud Instance](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1578/002) and stage data in that instance.(Citation: Mandiant M-Trends 2020) By staging data on one system prior to Exfiltration, adversaries can minimize the number of connections made to their C2 server and better evade detection.
Query: Sigma YAML for windows / security
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Potential threat actor tampering with Sysmon manifest and eventually disabling it. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: Sysmon Channel Reference Deletion id: 18beca67-ab3e-4ee3-ba7a-a46ca8d7d0cc status: test description: Potential threat actor tampering with Sysmon manifest and eventually disabling it references: - https://twitter.com/Flangvik/status/1283054508084473861 - https://twitter.com/SecurityJosh/status/1283027365770276866 - https://securityjosh.github.io/2020/04/23/Mute-Sysmon.html - https://gist.github.com/Cyb3rWard0g/cf08c38c61f7e46e8404b38201ca01c8 author: Roberto Rodriguez (Cyb3rWard0g), OTR (Open Threat Research) date: 2020-07-14 modified: 2025-10-22 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1112 logsource: product: windows service: security detection: selection1: EventID: 4657 ObjectName|contains: - WINEVT\Publishers\{5770385f-c22a-43e0-bf4c-06f5698ffbd9} - WINEVT\Channels\Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational ObjectValueName: Enabled NewValue: 0 selection2: EventID: 4663 ObjectName|contains: - WINEVT\Publishers\{5770385f-c22a-43e0-bf4c-06f5698ffbd9} - WINEVT\Channels\Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational AccessMask: '0x10000' condition: 1 of selection* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects process connections to a Monero crypto mining pool. Logsource: linux / network_connection. Rule: title: Linux Crypto Mining Pool Connections id: a46c93b7-55ed-4d27-a41b-c259456c4746 status: stable description: Detects process connections to a Monero crypto mining pool references: - https://www.poolwatch.io/coin/monero author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-10-26 tags: - attack.impact - attack.t1496 logsource: product: linux category: network_connection detection: selection: DestinationHostname: - pool.minexmr.com - fr.minexmr.com - de.minexmr.com - sg.minexmr.com - ca.minexmr.com - us-west.minexmr.com - pool.supportxmr.com - mine.c3pool.com - xmr-eu1.nanopool.org - xmr-eu2.nanopool.org - xmr-us-east1.nanopool.org - xmr-us-west1.nanopool.org - xmr-asia1.nanopool.org - xmr-jp1.nanopool.org - xmr-au1.nanopool.org - xmr.2miners.com - xmr.hashcity.org - xmr.f2pool.com - xmrpool.eu - pool.hashvault.pro - moneroocean.stream - monerocean.stream condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate use of crypto miners level: high
Query: what is T1134
Matching passage: T1134 Access Token Manipulation. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls. Windows uses access tokens to determine the ownership of a running process. A user can manipulate access tokens to make a running process appear as though it is the child of a different process or belongs to someone other than the user that started the process. When this occurs, the process also takes on the security context associated with the new token. An adversary can use built-in Windows API functions to copy access tokens from existing processes; this is known as token stealing. These token can then be applied to an existing process (i.e. [Token Impersonation/Theft](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001)) or used to spawn a new process (i.e. [Create Process with Token](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/002)). An adversary must already be in a privileged user context (i.e. administrator) to steal a token. However, adversaries commonly use token stealing to elevate their security context from the administrator level to the SYSTEM level. An adversary can then use a token to authenticate to a remote system as the account for that token if the account has appropriate permissions on the remote system.(Citation: Pentestlab Token Manipulation) Any standard user can use the <code>runas</code> command, and the Windows API functions, to create impersonation tokens; it does not require access to an administrator account. There are also other mechanisms, such as Active Directory fields, that can be used to modify access tokens.
Near-miss passage: T1134.003 Make and Impersonate Token. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may make new tokens and impersonate users to escalate privileges and bypass access controls. For example, if an adversary has a username and password but the user is not logged onto the system the adversary can then create a logon session for the user using the `LogonUser` function.(Citation: LogonUserW function) The function will return a copy of the new session's access token and the adversary can use `SetThreadToken` to assign the token to a thread. This behavior is distinct from [Token Impersonation/Theft](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1134/001) in that this refers to creating a new user token instead of stealing or duplicating an existing one.