alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: risk of Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the login page in RXTEC RXAdmin UPDATE 06 / 2012 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) loginpassword, (2) l
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8298. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the login page in RXTEC RXAdmin UPDATE 06 / 2012 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) loginpassword, (2) loginusername, (3) zusatzlicher, or (4) groupid parameter to index.htm, or the (5) rxtec cookie to index.htm.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2292. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 6.5. Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in admin/class-bulk-editor-list-table.php in the WordPress SEO by Yoast plugin before 1.5.7, 1.6.x before 1.6.4, and 1.7.x before 1.7.4 for WordPress allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) order_by or (2) order parameter in the wpseo_bulk-editor page to wp-admin/admin.php. NOTE: this can be leveraged using CSRF to allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands.
Query: write Sigma for Detects potential suspicious run-only executions compiled using OSACompile
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential suspicious run-only executions compiled using OSACompile. Logsource: macos / process_creation. Rule: title: OSACompile Run-Only Execution id: b9d9b652-d8ed-4697-89a2-a1186ee680ac status: test description: Detects potential suspicious run-only executions compiled using OSACompile references: - https://redcanary.com/blog/applescript/ - https://ss64.com/osx/osacompile.html author: Sohan G (D4rkCiph3r) date: 2023-01-31 tags: - attack.t1059.002 - attack.execution logsource: product: macos category: process_creation detection: selection: CommandLine|contains|all: - osacompile - ' -x ' - ' -e ' condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the presence of "bpf_probe_write_user" BPF helper-generated warning messages. Which could be a sign of suspiciou. Logsource: linux. Rule: title: Potential Suspicious BPF Activity - Linux id: 0fadd880-6af3-4610-b1e5-008dc3a11b8a status: test description: Detects the presence of "bpf_probe_write_user" BPF helper-generated warning messages. Which could be a sign of suspicious eBPF activity on the system. references: - https://redcanary.com/blog/ebpf-malware/ - https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bpf-helpers.7.html author: Red Canary (idea), Nasreddine Bencherchali date: 2023-01-25 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.stealth logsource: product: linux detection: selection: - bpf_probe_write_user condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: describe CVE-2015-9071
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9071. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, a buffer over-read vulnerability exists in a TrustZone syscall.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6693. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. The signatureSetSeedValue method in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.16 and 11.x before 11.0.13, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30094, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.009.20069 on Windows and OS X allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via crafted arguments, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6685, CVE-2015-6686, CVE-2015-6694, CVE-2015-6695, and CVE-2015-7622.
Query: risk of The presentation transmission permission management mechanism in Huawei TE30, TE40, TE50, and TE60 multimedia video conferencing endpoints with software before V100R001C10SPC100 al
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8672. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 5.300000190734863. The presentation transmission permission management mechanism in Huawei TE30, TE40, TE50, and TE60 multimedia video conferencing endpoints with software before V100R001C10SPC100 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (wired presentation outage) via unspecified vectors involving a wireless presentation.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9166. CWE: CWE-19. CVSS: 7.5. In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear IPQ4019, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, and SD 850, DRM provisioning mechanisms used in QSEE applications have a feature to prevent further provisioning. This is done by creating an SFS file called 'finalize_prov_flag.data' at the end of provisioning. When this feature is enabled, provisioning calls check for the existence of the file in order to decide whether to do provisioning or not. Current implementation allows provisioning without sufficient checks.
Query: Encoded PowerShell / command-line abuse matching Office Test
Matching passage: T1137.002 Office Test. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may abuse the Microsoft Office "Office Test" Registry key to obtain persistence on a compromised system. An Office Test Registry location exists that allows a user to specify an arbitrary DLL that will be executed every time an Office application is started. This Registry key is thought to be used by Microsoft to load DLLs for testing and debugging purposes while developing Office applications. This Registry key is not created by default during an Office installation.(Citation: Hexacorn Office Test)(Citation: Palo Alto Office Test Sofacy) There exist user and global Registry keys for the Office Test feature, such as: * <code>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office test\Special\Perf</code> * <code>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Office test\Special\Perf</code> Adversaries may add this Registry key and specify a malicious DLL that will be executed whenever an Office application, such as Word or Excel, is started.
Near-miss passage: T1137 Office Application Startup. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may leverage Microsoft Office-based applications for persistence between startups. Microsoft Office is a fairly common application suite on Windows-based operating systems within an enterprise network. There are multiple mechanisms that can be used with Office for persistence when an Office-based application is started; this can include the use of Office Template Macros and add-ins. A variety of features have been discovered in Outlook that can be abused to obtain persistence, such as Outlook rules, forms, and Home Page.(Citation: SensePost Ruler GitHub) These persistence mechanisms can work within Outlook or be used through Office 365.(Citation: TechNet O365 Outlook Rules)
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-2150
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2150. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 4.900000095367432. Xen 3.3.x through 4.5.x and the Linux kernel through 3.19.1 do not properly restrict access to PCI command registers, which might allow local guest OS users to cause a denial of service (non-maskable interrupt and host crash) by disabling the (1) memory or (2) I/O decoding for a PCI Express device and then accessing the device, which triggers an Unsupported Request (UR) response.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7861. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 10.0. Persistent Accelerite Radia Client Automation (formerly HP Client Automation), possibly before 9.1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending unspecified commands in an environment that lacks relationship-based firewalling.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-9449
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9449. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.199999809265137. The microblog-poster plugin before 1.6.2 for WordPress has SQL Injection via the wp-admin/options-general.php?page=microblogposter.php account_id parameter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9330. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. The wp-all-import plugin before 3.2.5 for WordPress has blind SQL injection.
Query: exploit IBM UrbanCode Deploy 6.0 and 6.0.1.x before 6.0.1.10, 6.1.1.x before 6.1.1.8, and 6.1.2 writes admin AUTH_TOKEN values to execution logs, which allows remote authenticated users to
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4964. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 6.0. IBM UrbanCode Deploy 6.0 and 6.0.1.x before 6.0.1.10, 6.1.1.x before 6.1.1.8, and 6.1.2 writes admin AUTH_TOKEN values to execution logs, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by leveraging the ability to create and execute a process.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0861. CWE: CWE-264. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. model/modelstorage.py in trytond 3.2.x before 3.2.10, 3.4.x before 3.4.8, 3.6.x before 3.6.5, and 3.8.x before 3.8.1 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and write to arbitrary fields via a sequence of records.
Query: exploit HPE ArcSight Logger before 6.1P1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified input to the (1) Intellicus or (2) client-certificate upload component.
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6863. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.300000190734863. HPE ArcSight Logger before 6.1P1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified input to the (1) Intellicus or (2) client-certificate upload component.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5234. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. IcedTea-Web before 1.5.3 and 1.6.x before 1.6.1 does not properly sanitize applet URLs, which allows remote attackers to inject applets into the .appletTrustSettings configuration file and bypass user approval to execute the applet via a crafted web page, possibly related to line breaks.
Query: exploit The dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp function in epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c in the ZigBee ZCL dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.9 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8732. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.5. The dissect_zcl_pwr_prof_pwrprofstatersp function in epan/dissectors/packet-zbee-zcl-general.c in the ZigBee ZCL dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.9 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 does not validate the Total Profile Number field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted packet.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6782. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The Document::open function in WebKit/Source/core/dom/Document.cpp in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73 does not ensure that page-dismissal event handling is compatible with modal-dialog blocking, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof Omnibox content via a crafted web site.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-9396
Matching passage: CVE-2015-9396. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. The auto-thickbox-plus plugin through 1.9 for WordPress has wp-content/plugins/auto-thickbox-plus/download.min.php?file= XSS.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3169. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 6.099999904632568. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in askbot 0.7.51-4.el6.noarch.
Query: explain T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood
Matching passage: T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood. Tactics: impact. Description: Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications. For example, specific features in web applications may be highly resource intensive. Repeated requests to those features may be able to exhaust system resources and deny access to the application or the server itself.(Citation: Arbor AnnualDoSreport Jan 2018)
Near-miss passage: T1499.001 OS Exhaustion Flood. Tactics: impact. Description: Adversaries may launch a denial of service (DoS) attack targeting an endpoint's operating system (OS). A system's OS is responsible for managing the finite resources as well as preventing the entire system from being overwhelmed by excessive demands on its capacity. These attacks do not need to exhaust the actual resources on a system; the attacks may simply exhaust the limits and available resources that an OS self-imposes. Different ways to achieve this exist, including TCP state-exhaustion attacks such as SYN floods and ACK floods.(Citation: Arbor AnnualDoSreport Jan 2018) With SYN floods, excessive amounts of SYN packets are sent, but the 3-way TCP handshake is never completed. Because each OS has a maximum number of concurrent TCP connections that it will allow, this can quickly exhaust the ability of the system to receive new requests for TCP connections, thus preventing access to any TCP service provided by the server.(Citation: Cloudflare SynFlood) ACK floods leverage the stateful nature of the TCP protocol. A flood of ACK packets are sent to the target. This forces the OS to search its state table for a related TCP connection that has already been established. Because the ACK packets are for connections that do not exist, the OS will have to search the entire state table to confirm that no match exists. When it is necessary to do this for a large flood of packets, the computational requirements can cause the server to become sluggish and/or unresponsive, due to the work it must do to eliminate the rogue ACK packets. This greatly reduces the resources available for providing the targeted service.(Citation: Corero SYN-ACKflood)
Query: actor TTPs: Process Injection
Matching passage: T1055 Process Injection. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges. Process injection is a method of executing arbitrary code in the address space of a separate live process. Running code in the context of another process may allow access to the process's memory, system/network resources, and possibly elevated privileges. Execution via process injection may also evade detection from security products since the execution is masked under a legitimate process. There are many different ways to inject code into a process, many of which abuse legitimate functionalities. These implementations exist for every major OS but are typically platform specific. More sophisticated samples may perform multiple process injections to segment modules and further evade detection, utilizing named pipes or other inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms as a communication channel.
Near-miss passage: T1055.004 Asynchronous Procedure Call. Tactics: stealth, privilege escalation. Description: Adversaries may inject malicious code into processes via the asynchronous procedure call (APC) queue in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges. APC injection is a method of executing arbitrary code in the address space of a separate live process. APC injection is commonly performed by attaching malicious code to the APC Queue (Citation: Microsoft APC) of a process's thread. Queued APC functions are executed when the thread enters an alterable state.(Citation: Microsoft APC) A handle to an existing victim process is first created with native Windows API calls such as <code>OpenThread</code>. At this point <code>QueueUserAPC</code> can be used to invoke a function (such as <code>LoadLibrayA</code> pointing to a malicious DLL). A variation of APC injection, dubbed "Early Bird injection", involves creating a suspended process in which malicious code can be written and executed before the process' entry point (and potentially subsequent anti-malware hooks) via an APC. (Citation: CyberBit Early Bird Apr 2018) AtomBombing (Citation: ENSIL AtomBombing Oct 2016) is another variation that utilizes APCs to invoke malicious code previously written to the global atom table.(Citation: Microsoft Atom Table) Running code in the context of another process may allow access to the process's memory, system/network resources, and possibly elevated privileges. Execution via APC injection may also evade detection from security products since the execution is masked under a legitimate process.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-1246
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1246. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 5.0. Blink, as used in Google Chrome before 42.0.2311.90, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7201. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the browser engine in Mozilla Firefox before 43.0 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.5 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.
Query: describe CVE-2015-4658
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4658. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.5. Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in admin/login.php in Milw0rm Clone Script 1.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) usr or (2) pwd parameter.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-10066. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. A vulnerability was found in tynx wuersch and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function packValue/getByCustomQuery of the file backend/base/Store.class.php. The manipulation leads to sql injection. The patch is identified as 66d4718750a741d1053d327a79e285fd50372519. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-218462 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
Query: alert when Detects when a Azure Kubernetes Cluster is created or deleted.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects when a Azure Kubernetes Cluster is created or deleted.. Logsource: azure / activitylogs. Rule: title: Azure Kubernetes Cluster Created or Deleted id: 9541f321-7cba-4b43-80fc-fbd1fb922808 status: test description: Detects when a Azure Kubernetes Cluster is created or deleted. references: - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/role-based-access-control/resource-provider-operations#microsoftkubernetes - https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2021/03/23/secure-containerized-environments-with-updated-threat-matrix-for-kubernetes/ - https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2020/04/02/attack-matrix-kubernetes/ - https://medium.com/mitre-engenuity/att-ck-for-containers-now-available-4c2359654bf1 author: Austin Songer @austinsonger date: 2021-08-07 modified: 2022-08-23 tags: - attack.impact - attack.t1485 - attack.t1496 - attack.t1489 logsource: product: azure service: activitylogs detection: selection: operationName: - MICROSOFT.KUBERNETES/CONNECTEDCLUSTERS/WRITE - MICROSOFT.KUBERNETES/CONNECTEDCLUSTERS/DELETE condition: selection falsepositives: - Kubernetes cluster being created or deleted may be performed by a system administrator. Verify whether the user identity, user agent, and/or hostname should be making changes in your environment. - Kubernetes cluster created or deleted from unfamiliar users should be investigated. If known behavior is causing false positives, it can be exempted from the rule. level: low
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the use of DISM to enable the PowerShell Web Access feature, which could be used for remote access and potential. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: PowerShell Web Access Feature Enabled Via DISM id: 7e8f2d3b-9c1a-4f67-b9e8-8d9006e0e51f status: test description: Detects the use of DISM to enable the PowerShell Web Access feature, which could be used for remote access and potential abuse references: - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/dism/enable-windowsoptionalfeature - https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa24-241a - https://gist.github.com/MHaggis/7e67b659af9148fa593cf2402edebb41 author: Michael Haag date: 2024-09-03 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.persistence - attack.t1548.002 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \dism.exe - OriginalFileName: DISM.EXE selection_cli: CommandLine|contains|all: - WindowsPowerShellWebAccess - /online - /enable-feature condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Legitimate PowerShell Web Access installations by administrators level: high
Query: detection engineering for Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
Matching passage: T1041 Exfiltration Over C2 Channel. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may steal data by exfiltrating it over an existing command and control channel. Stolen data is encoded into the normal communications channel using the same protocol as command and control communications.
Near-miss passage: T1020.001 Traffic Duplication. Tactics: exfiltration. Description: Adversaries may leverage traffic mirroring in order to automate data exfiltration over compromised infrastructure. Traffic mirroring is a native feature for some devices, often used for network analysis. For example, devices may be configured to forward network traffic to one or more destinations for analysis by a network analyzer or other monitoring device. (Citation: Cisco Traffic Mirroring)(Citation: Juniper Traffic Mirroring) Adversaries may abuse traffic mirroring to mirror or redirect network traffic through other infrastructure they control. Malicious modifications to network devices to enable traffic redirection may be possible through [ROMMONkit](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1542/004) or [Patch System Image](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1601/001).(Citation: US-CERT-TA18-106A)(Citation: Cisco Blog Legacy Device Attacks) Many cloud-based environments also support traffic mirroring. For example, AWS Traffic Mirroring, GCP Packet Mirroring, and Azure vTap allow users to define specified instances to collect traffic from and specified targets to send collected traffic to.(Citation: AWS Traffic Mirroring)(Citation: GCP Packet Mirroring)(Citation: Azure Virtual Network TAP) Adversaries may use traffic duplication in conjunction with [Network Sniffing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1040), [Input Capture](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1056), or [Adversary-in-the-Middle](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1557) depending on the goals and objectives of the adversary.
Query: mitigate Python
Matching passage: T1059.006 Python. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse Python commands and scripts for execution. Python is a very popular scripting/programming language, with capabilities to perform many functions. Python can be executed interactively from the command-line (via the <code>python.exe</code> interpreter) or via scripts (.py) that can be written and distributed to different systems. Python code can also be compiled into binary executables.(Citation: Zscaler APT31 Covid-19 October 2020) Python comes with many built-in packages to interact with the underlying system, such as file operations and device I/O. Adversaries can use these libraries to download and execute commands or other scripts as well as perform various malicious behaviors.
Near-miss passage: T1059.009 Cloud API. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse cloud APIs to execute malicious commands. APIs available in cloud environments provide various functionalities and are a feature-rich method for programmatic access to nearly all aspects of a tenant. These APIs may be utilized through various methods such as command line interpreters (CLIs), in-browser Cloud Shells, [PowerShell](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001) modules like Azure for PowerShell(Citation: Microsoft - Azure PowerShell), or software developer kits (SDKs) available for languages such as [Python](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/006). Cloud API functionality may allow for administrative access across all major services in a tenant such as compute, storage, identity and access management (IAM), networking, and security policies. With proper permissions (often via use of credentials such as [Application Access Token](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1550/001) and [Web Session Cookie](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1550/004)), adversaries may abuse cloud APIs to invoke various functions that execute malicious actions. For example, CLI and PowerShell functionality may be accessed through binaries installed on cloud-hosted or on-premises hosts or accessed through a browser-based cloud shell offered by many cloud platforms (such as AWS, Azure, and GCP). These cloud shells are often a packaged unified environment to use CLI and/or scripting modules hosted as a container in the cloud environment.