alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: rule covering Detects the pattern of UAC Bypass using Event Viewer RecentViews
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects the pattern of UAC Bypass using Event Viewer RecentViews. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: UAC Bypass Using Event Viewer RecentViews id: 30fc8de7-d833-40c4-96b6-28319fbc4f6c related: - id: 63e4f530-65dc-49cc-8f80-ccfa95c69d43 type: similar status: test description: Detects the pattern of UAC Bypass using Event Viewer RecentViews references: - https://twitter.com/orange_8361/status/1518970259868626944 - https://lolbas-project.github.io/lolbas/Binaries/Eventvwr/#execute author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-11-22 tags: - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.stealth logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_path: CommandLine|contains: - \Event Viewer\RecentViews - \EventV~1\RecentViews selection_redirect: CommandLine|contains: '>' condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Adversaries may disable or modify system firewalls in order to bypass controls limiting network usage. Logsource: windows / registry_set. Rule: title: Disable Microsoft Defender Firewall via Registry id: 974515da-6cc5-4c95-ae65-f97f9150ec7f status: test description: Adversaries may disable or modify system firewalls in order to bypass controls limiting network usage references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1562.004/T1562.004.md#atomic-test-2---disable-microsoft-defender-firewall-via-registry author: frack113 date: 2022-01-09 modified: 2024-03-25 tags: - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1686.003 logsource: category: registry_set product: windows detection: selection: TargetObject|contains: \Services\SharedAccess\Parameters\FirewallPolicy\ TargetObject|endswith: \EnableFirewall Details: DWORD (0x00000000) condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium regression_tests_path: regression_data/rules/windows/registry/registry_set/registry_set_disable_defender_firewall/info.yml simulation: - type: atomic-red-team name: Disable Microsoft Defender Firewall via Registry technique: T1562.004 atomic_guid: afedc8c4-038c-4d82-b3e5-623a95f8a612
Query: what is T1669
Matching passage: T1669 Wi-Fi Networks. Tactics: initial access. Description: Adversaries may gain initial access to target systems by connecting to wireless networks. They may accomplish this by exploiting open Wi-Fi networks used by target devices or by accessing secured Wi-Fi networks — requiring [Valid Accounts](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078) — belonging to a target organization.(Citation: DOJ GRU Charges 2018)(Citation: Nearest Neighbor Volexity) Establishing a connection to a Wi-Fi access point requires a certain level of proximity to both discover and maintain a stable network connection. Adversaries may establish a wireless connection through various methods, such as by physically positioning themselves near a Wi-Fi network to conduct close access operations. To bypass the need for physical proximity, adversaries may attempt to remotely compromise nearby third-party systems that have both wired and wireless network connections available (i.e., dual-homed systems). These third-party compromised devices can then serve as a bridge to connect to a target’s Wi-Fi network.(Citation: Nearest Neighbor Volexity) Once an initial wireless connection is achieved, adversaries may leverage this access for follow-on activities in the victim network or further targeting of specific devices on the network. Adversaries may perform [Network Sniffing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1040) or [Adversary-in-the-Middle](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1557) activities for [Credential Access](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0006) or [Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0007).
Near-miss passage: T1078.002 Domain Accounts. Tactics: stealth, persistence, privilege escalation, initial access. Description: Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of a domain account as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion.(Citation: TechNet Credential Theft) Domain accounts are those managed by Active Directory Domain Services where access and permissions are configured across systems and services that are part of that domain. Domain accounts can cover users, administrators, and services.(Citation: Microsoft AD Accounts) Adversaries may compromise domain accounts, some with a high level of privileges, through various means such as [OS Credential Dumping](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1003) or password reuse, allowing access to privileged resources of the domain.
Query: vulnerability: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the administrative interface in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server 2.5 and 2.5.0.997 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0634. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the administrative interface in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server 2.5 and 2.5.0.997 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCuq86310.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8687. CWE: CWE-79. CVSS: 5.400000095367432. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Management Console in Alcatel-Lucent Motive Home Device Manager (HDM) before 4.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) deviceTypeID parameter to DeviceType/getDeviceType.do; the (2) policyActionClass or (3) policyActionName parameter to PolicyAction/findPolicyActions.do; the deviceID parameter to (4) SingleDeviceMgmt/getDevice.do or (5) device/editDevice.do; the operation parameter to (6) ajax.do or (7) xmlHttp.do; or the (8) policyAction, (9) policyClass, or (10) policyName parameter to policy/findPolicies.do.
Query: explain T1573.002 Asymmetric Cryptography
Matching passage: T1573.002 Asymmetric Cryptography. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may employ a known asymmetric encryption algorithm to conceal command and control traffic rather than relying on any inherent protections provided by a communication protocol. Asymmetric cryptography, also known as public key cryptography, uses a keypair per party: one public that can be freely distributed, and one private. Due to how the keys are generated, the sender encrypts data with the receiver’s public key and the receiver decrypts the data with their private key. This ensures that only the intended recipient can read the encrypted data. Common public key encryption algorithms include RSA and ElGamal. For efficiency, many protocols (including SSL/TLS) use symmetric cryptography once a connection is established, but use asymmetric cryptography to establish or transmit a key. As such, these protocols are classified as [Asymmetric Cryptography](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1573/002).
Near-miss passage: T1573 Encrypted Channel. Tactics: command and control. Description: Adversaries may employ an encryption algorithm to conceal command and control traffic rather than relying on any inherent protections provided by a communication protocol. Despite the use of a secure algorithm, these implementations may be vulnerable to reverse engineering if secret keys are encoded and/or generated within malware samples/configuration files.
Query: SOC alert related to Office Application Startup
Matching passage: T1137 Office Application Startup. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may leverage Microsoft Office-based applications for persistence between startups. Microsoft Office is a fairly common application suite on Windows-based operating systems within an enterprise network. There are multiple mechanisms that can be used with Office for persistence when an Office-based application is started; this can include the use of Office Template Macros and add-ins. A variety of features have been discovered in Outlook that can be abused to obtain persistence, such as Outlook rules, forms, and Home Page.(Citation: SensePost Ruler GitHub) These persistence mechanisms can work within Outlook or be used through Office 365.(Citation: TechNet O365 Outlook Rules)
Near-miss passage: T1137.003 Outlook Forms. Tactics: persistence. Description: Adversaries may abuse Microsoft Outlook forms to obtain persistence on a compromised system. Outlook forms are used as templates for presentation and functionality in Outlook messages. Custom Outlook forms can be created that will execute code when a specifically crafted email is sent by an adversary utilizing the same custom Outlook form.(Citation: SensePost Outlook Forms) Once malicious forms have been added to the user’s mailbox, they will be loaded when Outlook is started. Malicious forms will execute when an adversary sends a specifically crafted email to the user.(Citation: SensePost Outlook Forms)
Query: rule covering Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of network connections to or from the compromised system they are currently acc
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of network connections to or from the compromised system they are currently acc. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: System Network Connections Discovery Via Net.EXE id: 1c67a717-32ba-409b-a45d-0fb704a73a81 status: test description: Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of network connections to or from the compromised system they are currently accessing or from remote systems by querying for information over the network. references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1049/T1049.md#atomic-test-1---system-network-connections-discovery author: frack113 date: 2021-12-10 modified: 2023-02-21 tags: - attack.discovery - attack.t1049 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: - \net.exe - \net1.exe - OriginalFileName: - net.exe - net1.exe selection_cli: - CommandLine|endswith: - ' use' - ' sessions' - CommandLine|contains: - ' use ' - ' sessions ' condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: low
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: This rule detects execution of a PowerShell code through the sqltoolsps.exe utility, which is included in the standard s. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: SQL Client Tools PowerShell Session Detection id: a746c9b8-a2fb-4ee5-a428-92bee9e99060 status: test description: 'This rule detects execution of a PowerShell code through the sqltoolsps.exe utility, which is included in the standard set of utilities supplied with the Microsoft SQL Server Management studio. Script blocks are not logged in this case, so this utility helps to bypass protection mechanisms based on the analysis of these logs. ' references: - https://github.com/LOLBAS-Project/LOLBAS/blob/8283d8d91552213ded165fd36deb6cb9534cb443/yml/OtherMSBinaries/Sqltoolsps.yml - https://twitter.com/pabraeken/status/993298228840992768 author: Agro (@agro_sev) oscd.communitly date: 2020-10-13 modified: 2022-02-25 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1059.001 - attack.t1127 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: - Image|endswith: \sqltoolsps.exe - ParentImage|endswith: \sqltoolsps.exe - OriginalFileName: \sqltoolsps.exe filter: ParentImage|endswith: \smss.exe condition: selection and not filter falsepositives: - Direct PS command execution through SQLToolsPS.exe is uncommon, childprocess sqltoolsps.exe spawned by smss.exe is a legitimate action. level: medium
Query: explain CWE-475
Matching passage: CWE-475 Undefined Behavior for Input to API. The behavior of this function is undefined unless its control parameter is set to a specific value.
Near-miss passage: CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.
Query: detection rule: Hides the file extension through modification of the registry
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Hides the file extension through modification of the registry. Logsource: windows / registry_set. Rule: title: IE Change Domain Zone id: 45e112d0-7759-4c2a-aa36-9f8fb79d3393 related: - id: d88d0ab2-e696-4d40-a2ed-9790064e66b3 type: derived status: test description: Hides the file extension through modification of the registry references: - https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1112/T1112.md#atomic-test-4---add-domain-to-trusted-sites-zone - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/developer/browsers/security-privacy/ie-security-zones-registry-entries author: frack113 date: 2022-01-22 modified: 2023-08-17 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.t1137 logsource: category: registry_set product: windows detection: selection_domains: TargetObject|contains: \SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\Domains\ filter: Details: - DWORD (0x00000000) - DWORD (0x00000001) - (Empty) condition: selection_domains and not filter falsepositives: - Administrative scripts level: medium regression_tests_path: regression_data/rules/windows/registry/registry_set/registry_set_change_security_zones/info.yml simulation: - type: atomic-red-team name: Add Domain to Trusted Sites Zone technique: T1112 atomic_guid: cf447677-5a4e-4937-a82c-e47d254afd57
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects potential suspicious behaviour using secedit.exe. Such as exporting or modifying the security policy. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Suspicious Activity Using SeCEdit id: c2c76b77-32be-4d1f-82c9-7e544bdfe0eb status: test description: Detects potential suspicious behaviour using secedit.exe. Such as exporting or modifying the security policy references: - https://blueteamops.medium.com/secedit-and-i-know-it-595056dee53d - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/secedit author: Janantha Marasinghe date: 2022-11-18 modified: 2022-12-30 tags: - attack.collection - attack.discovery - attack.persistence - attack.credential-access - attack.privilege-escalation - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1685.001 - attack.t1547.001 - attack.t1505.005 - attack.t1556.002 - attack.t1685 - attack.t1574.007 - attack.t1564.002 - attack.t1546.008 - attack.t1546.007 - attack.t1547.014 - attack.t1547.010 - attack.t1547.002 - attack.t1557 - attack.t1082 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \secedit.exe - OriginalFileName: SeCEdit selection_flags_discovery: CommandLine|contains|all: - /export - /cfg selection_flags_configure: CommandLine|contains|all: - /configure - /db condition: selection_img and (1 of selection_flags_*) falsepositives: - Legitimate administrative use level: medium
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-1087
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1087. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. Directory traversal vulnerability in Backup in Apple iOS before 8.3 allows attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted relative path.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-1198. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 7.5. Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in ha 0.999p+dfsg-5.
Query: what is T1564
Matching passage: T1564 Hide Artifacts. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may attempt to hide artifacts associated with their behaviors to evade detection. Operating systems may have features to hide various artifacts, such as important system files and administrative task execution, to avoid disrupting user work environments and prevent users from changing files or features on the system. Adversaries may abuse these features to hide artifacts such as files, directories, user accounts, or other system activity to evade detection.(Citation: Sofacy Komplex Trojan)(Citation: Cybereason OSX Pirrit)(Citation: MalwareBytes ADS July 2015) Adversaries may also attempt to hide artifacts associated with malicious behavior by creating computing regions that are isolated from common security instrumentation, such as through the use of virtualization technology.(Citation: Sophos Ragnar May 2020)
Near-miss passage: T1564.004 NTFS File Attributes. Tactics: stealth. Description: Adversaries may use NTFS file attributes to hide their malicious data in order to evade detection. Every New Technology File System (NTFS) formatted partition contains a Master File Table (MFT) that maintains a record for every file/directory on the partition. (Citation: SpectorOps Host-Based Jul 2017) Within MFT entries are file attributes, (Citation: Microsoft NTFS File Attributes Aug 2010) such as Extended Attributes (EA) and Data [known as Alternate Data Streams (ADSs) when more than one Data attribute is present], that can be used to store arbitrary data (and even complete files). (Citation: SpectorOps Host-Based Jul 2017) (Citation: Microsoft File Streams) (Citation: MalwareBytes ADS July 2015) (Citation: Microsoft ADS Mar 2014) Adversaries may store malicious data or binaries in file attribute metadata instead of directly in files. This may be done to evade some defenses, such as static indicator scanning tools and anti-virus. (Citation: Journey into IR ZeroAccess NTFS EA) (Citation: MalwareBytes ADS July 2015)
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-2487
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2487. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2486, CVE-2015-2490, CVE-2015-2492, CVE-2015-2494, CVE-2015-2498, and CVE-2015-2499.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5773. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. QL Office in Apple iOS before 8.4.1 and OS X before 10.10.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted office document.
Query: write Sigma for Detects an attempt to execute code or create service on remote host via winrm.vbs.
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects an attempt to execute code or create service on remote host via winrm.vbs.. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Remote Code Execute via Winrm.vbs id: 9df0dd3a-1a5c-47e3-a2bc-30ed177646a0 status: test description: Detects an attempt to execute code or create service on remote host via winrm.vbs. references: - https://twitter.com/bohops/status/994405551751815170 - https://redcanary.com/blog/lateral-movement-winrm-wmi/ - https://lolbas-project.github.io/lolbas/Scripts/Winrm/ author: Julia Fomina, oscd.community date: 2020-10-07 modified: 2023-03-03 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1216 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \cscript.exe - OriginalFileName: cscript.exe selection_cli: CommandLine|contains|all: - winrm - invoke Create wmicimv2/Win32_ - -r:http condition: all of selection* falsepositives: - Unknown level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects successful logon with logon type 9 (NewCredentials) which matches the Overpass the Hash behavior of e.g Mimikatz. Logsource: windows / security. Rule: title: Successful Overpass the Hash Attempt id: 192a0330-c20b-4356-90b6-7b7049ae0b87 status: test description: Detects successful logon with logon type 9 (NewCredentials) which matches the Overpass the Hash behavior of e.g Mimikatz's sekurlsa::pth module. references: - https://web.archive.org/web/20220419045003/https://cyberwardog.blogspot.com/2017/04/chronicles-of-threat-hunter-hunting-for.html author: Roberto Rodriguez (source), Dominik Schaudel (rule) date: 2018-02-12 modified: 2021-11-27 tags: - attack.lateral-movement - attack.s0002 - attack.t1550.002 logsource: product: windows service: security detection: selection: EventID: 4624 LogonType: 9 LogonProcessName: seclogo AuthenticationPackageName: Negotiate condition: selection falsepositives: - Runas command-line tool using /netonly parameter level: high
Query: vulnerability: Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.5.0, 8.5.1, and 8.5.2 allows local users to affect availability via unknown ve
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4877. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 1.5. Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 8.5.0, 8.5.1, and 8.5.2 allows local users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Outside In Filters, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4878.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-4880. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Content component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.1.3.5.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Content Server, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4867.
Query: vulnerability: packages/SystemUI/src/com/android/systemui/power/PowerNotificationWarnings.java in Android 5.x allows attackers to bypass a DEVICE_POWER permission requirement via a broadcast inte
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3854. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 7.5. packages/SystemUI/src/com/android/systemui/power/PowerNotificationWarnings.java in Android 5.x allows attackers to bypass a DEVICE_POWER permission requirement via a broadcast intent with the PNW.stopSaver action, aka internal bug 20918350.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3067. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.14 and 11.x before 11.0.11 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to bypass intended restrictions on JavaScript API execution via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-3060, CVE-2015-3061, CVE-2015-3062, CVE-2015-3063, CVE-2015-3064, CVE-2015-3065, CVE-2015-3066, CVE-2015-3068, CVE-2015-3069, CVE-2015-3071, CVE-2015-3072, CVE-2015-3073, and CVE-2015-3074.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-6728
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6728. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 7.5. The ApiBase::getWatchlistUser function in MediaWiki before 1.23.10, 1.24.x before 1.24.3, and 1.25.x before 1.25.2 does not perform token comparison in constant time, which allows remote attackers to guess the watchlist token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2848. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Honeywell Tuxedo Touch before 5.2.19.0_VA allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests associated with home-automation commands, as demonstrated by a door-unlock command.