alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: mitigate Firmware
Matching passage: T1592.003 Firmware. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may gather information about the victim's host firmware that can be used during targeting. Information about host firmware may include a variety of details such as type and versions on specific hosts, which may be used to infer more information about hosts in the environment (ex: configuration, purpose, age/patch level, etc.). Adversaries may gather this information in various ways, such as direct elicitation via [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598). Information about host firmware may only be exposed to adversaries via online or other accessible data sets (ex: job postings, network maps, assessment reports, resumes, or purchase invoices).(Citation: ArsTechnica Intel) Gathering this information may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593) or [Search Open Technical Databases](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1596)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Develop Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1587) or [Obtain Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588)), and/or initial access (ex: [Supply Chain Compromise](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1195) or [Exploit Public-Facing Application](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1190)).
Near-miss passage: T1592.001 Hardware. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may gather information about the victim's host hardware that can be used during targeting. Information about hardware infrastructure may include a variety of details such as types and versions on specific hosts, as well as the presence of additional components that might be indicative of added defensive protections (ex: card/biometric readers, dedicated encryption hardware, etc.). Adversaries may gather this information in various ways, such as direct collection actions via [Active Scanning](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1595) (ex: hostnames, server banners, user agent strings) or [Phishing for Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1598). Adversaries may also compromise sites then include malicious content designed to collect host information from visitors.(Citation: ATT ScanBox) Information about the hardware infrastructure may also be exposed to adversaries via online or other accessible data sets (ex: job postings, network maps, assessment reports, resumes, or purchase invoices). Gathering this information may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593) or [Search Open Technical Databases](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1596)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Develop Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1587) or [Obtain Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588)), and/or initial access (ex: [Compromise Hardware Supply Chain](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1195/003) or [Hardware Additions](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1200)).
Query: exploit Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in form2WlanSetup.cgi on Philippine Long Distance Telephone (PLDT) SpeedSurf 504AN devices with firmware GAN9.8U26-4-TX-R6B018-PH.EN
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5991. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in form2WlanSetup.cgi on Philippine Long Distance Telephone (PLDT) SpeedSurf 504AN devices with firmware GAN9.8U26-4-TX-R6B018-PH.EN and Kasda KW58293 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that perform setup operations, as demonstrated by modifying network settings.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7984. CWE: CWE-352. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Horde before 5.2.8, Horde Groupware before 5.2.11, and Horde Groupware Webmail Edition before 5.2.11 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary (1) commands via the cmd parameter to admin/cmdshell.php, (2) SQL queries via the sql parameter to admin/sqlshell.php, or (3) PHP code via the php parameter to admin/phpshell.php.
Query: risk of A successful exploit of these vulnerabilities requires the local user to load a crafted DLL file in the system directory on servers running Schneider Electric OFS v3.5 with version
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1014. CWE: CWE-427. CVSS: 7.300000190734863. A successful exploit of these vulnerabilities requires the local user to load a crafted DLL file in the system directory on servers running Schneider Electric OFS v3.5 with version v7.40 of SCADA Expert Vijeo Citect/CitectSCADA, OFS v3.5 with version v7.30 of Vijeo Citect/CitectSCADA, and OFS v3.5 with version v7.20 of Vijeo Citect/CitectSCADA.. If the application attempts to open that file, the application could crash or allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code. Schneider Electric recommends vulnerable users upgrade the OFS to V3.5 and install the latest service pack (SP 6 or newer) for their associated version.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0415. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.0. Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Object Library component in Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Session Management.
Query: vulnerability: Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3152. CWE: CWE-295. CVSS: 5.900000095367432. Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, aka a "BACKRONYM" attack.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-0294. CWE: CWE-295. CVSS: 7.5. GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-2196
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2196. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.5. SQL injection vulnerability in Spider Event Calendar 1.4.9 for WordPress allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the cat_id parameter in a spiderbigcalendar_month action to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2066. CWE: CWE-89. CVSS: 7.5. SQL injection vulnerability in DLGuard 4.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the c parameter to index.php.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-4315
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4315. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.5. The Call Policy Configuration page in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expressway X8.5.3 improperly validates external DTDs, which allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service via a crafted XML document, aka Bug ID CSCuv31853.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2754. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. FreeXL before 1.0.0i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack corruption) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted workbook, related to a "premature EOF."
Query: detect Identifies IPs from which users grant access to other users on azure resources and alerts when a previously unseen sourc in logs
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Identifies IPs from which users grant access to other users on azure resources and alerts when a previously unseen sourc. Logsource: azure / activitylogs. Rule: title: Rare Subscription-level Operations In Azure id: c1182e02-49a3-481c-b3de-0fadc4091488 status: test description: Identifies IPs from which users grant access to other users on azure resources and alerts when a previously unseen source IP address is used. references: - https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel/blob/e534407884b1ec5371efc9f76ead282176c9e8bb/Detections/AzureActivity/RareOperations.yaml author: sawwinnnaung date: 2020-05-07 modified: 2023-10-11 tags: - attack.t1003 - attack.credential-access logsource: product: azure service: activitylogs detection: keywords: - Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts/listKeys/action - Microsoft.Maps/accounts/listKeys/action - Microsoft.Media/mediaservices/listKeys/action - Microsoft.CognitiveServices/accounts/listKeys/action - Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/listKeys/action - Microsoft.Compute/snapshots/write - Microsoft.Network/networkSecurityGroups/write condition: keywords falsepositives: - Valid change level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the dump of highly sensitive files such as "NTDS.DIT" and "SECURITY" hive. Attackers can leverage the "wbadmin". Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Sensitive File Dump Via Wbadmin.EXE id: 8b93a509-1cb8-42e1-97aa-ee24224cdc15 status: test description: 'Detects the dump of highly sensitive files such as "NTDS.DIT" and "SECURITY" hive. Attackers can leverage the "wbadmin" utility in order to dump sensitive files that might contain credential or sensitive information. ' references: - https://github.com/LOLBAS-Project/LOLBAS/blob/2cc01b01132b5c304027a658c698ae09dd6a92bf/yml/OSBinaries/Wbadmin.yml - https://lolbas-project.github.io/lolbas/Binaries/Wbadmin/ - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/wbadmin-start-recovery - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/wbadmin-start-backup author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems), frack113 date: 2024-05-10 tags: - attack.credential-access - attack.t1003.003 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \wbadmin.exe - OriginalFileName: WBADMIN.EXE selection_backup: CommandLine|contains: - start - backup selection_path: CommandLine|contains: - \config\SAM - \config\SECURITY - \config\SYSTEM - \Windows\NTDS\NTDS.dit condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Legitimate backup operation by authorized administrators. Matches must be investigated and allowed on a case by case basis. level: high
Query: common weakness: Unsigned to Signed Conversion Error
Matching passage: CWE-196 Unsigned to Signed Conversion Error. The product uses an unsigned primitive and performs a cast to a signed primitive, which can produce an unexpected value if the value of the unsigned primitive can not be represented using a signed primitive.
Near-miss passage: CWE-454 External Initialization of Trusted Variables or Data Stores. The product initializes critical internal variables or data stores using inputs that can be modified by untrusted actors.
Query: exploit Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.6 and earlier gives valid SLAAC IPv6 addresses to interfaces when "boot protocol" is set to None, which might allow remote attackers to 
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5293. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 5.900000095367432. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.6 and earlier gives valid SLAAC IPv6 addresses to interfaces when "boot protocol" is set to None, which might allow remote attackers to communicate with a system designated to be unreachable.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9337. CWE: CWE-284. CVSS: 7.5. The profile-builder plugin before 2.1.4 for WordPress has no access control for activating or deactivating addons via AJAX.
Query: risk of Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel UI Framework component in Oracle Siebel CRM 8.1.1 and 8.2.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to
Matching passage: CVE-2015-0419. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel UI Framework component in Oracle Siebel CRM 8.1.1 and 8.2.2 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Portal Framework, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-1510.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2925. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 6.900000095367432. The prepend_path function in fs/dcache.c in the Linux kernel before 4.2.4 does not properly handle rename actions inside a bind mount, which allows local users to bypass an intended container protection mechanism by renaming a directory, related to a "double-chroot attack."
Query: detection rule: Detects possible password spraying attempts using Dsacls
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects possible password spraying attempts using Dsacls. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Potential Password Spraying Attempt Using Dsacls.EXE id: bac9fb54-2da7-44e9-988f-11e9a5edbc0c status: test description: Detects possible password spraying attempts using Dsacls references: - https://www.ired.team/offensive-security-experiments/active-directory-kerberos-abuse/using-dsacls-to-check-ad-object-permissions#password-spraying-anyone - https://ss64.com/nt/dsacls.html - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-server-2012-r2-and-2012/cc771151(v=ws.11) author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-06-20 modified: 2023-02-04 tags: - attack.stealth - attack.t1218 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \dsacls.exe - OriginalFileName: DSACLS.EXE selection_cli: CommandLine|contains|all: - '/user:' - '/passwd:' condition: all of selection* falsepositives: - Legitimate use of dsacls to bind to an LDAP session level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects when an attacker modifies the registry key "HtmlHelp Author" to achieve persistence. Logsource: windows / registry_set. Rule: title: Potential Persistence Via CHM Helper DLL id: 976dd1f2-a484-45ec-aa1d-0e87e882262b status: test description: Detects when an attacker modifies the registry key "HtmlHelp Author" to achieve persistence references: - https://persistence-info.github.io/Data/htmlhelpauthor.html - https://www.hexacorn.com/blog/2018/04/22/beyond-good-ol-run-key-part-76/ author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-07-21 modified: 2023-08-17 tags: - attack.persistence logsource: category: registry_set product: windows detection: selection: TargetObject|contains: - \Software\Microsoft\HtmlHelp Author\Location - \Software\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\HtmlHelp Author\Location condition: selection falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: incident response steps for Suspicious Data from Removable Media execution detected on endpoint
Matching passage: Playbook for T1025 Data from Removable Media. 1) Validate alert telemetry against T1025. 2) Scope affected hosts and accounts. 3) Contain by isolating endpoint / disabling account if confirmed. 4) Hunt for related tactics: collection. 5) Eradicate persistence and recover. Reference detection notes: Adversaries may search connected removable media on computers they have compromised to find files of interest. Sensitive data can be collected from any removable media (optical disk drive, USB memory, etc.) connected to the compromised system prior to Exfiltration. Interactive command shells may be in use, and common functionality within [cmd](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0106) may be used t
Near-miss passage: Playbook for T1056.002 GUI Input Capture. Different response path focused on collection, credential access.
Query: describe CVE-2015-7850
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7850. CWE: CWE-835. CVSS: 6.5. ntpd in NTP 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (infinite loop or crash) by pointing the key file at the log file.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8901. CWE: CWE-835. CVSS: 6.5. ImageMagick 6.x before 6.9.0-5 Beta allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted MIFF file.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-1487
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1487. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 5.5. The management console in Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM) 12.1 before 12.1-RU6-MP1 allows remote authenticated users to write to arbitrary files, and consequently obtain administrator privileges, via a crafted filename.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2754. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. FreeXL before 1.0.0i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack corruption) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted workbook, related to a "premature EOF."
Query: describe CVE-2015-6914
Matching passage: CVE-2015-6914. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. Absolute path traversal vulnerability in SiteFactory CMS 5.5.9 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a full pathname in the file parameter to assets/download.aspx.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-2060. CWE: CWE-22. CVSS: 5.300000190734863. cabextract before 1.6 does not properly check for leading slashes when extracting files, which allows remote attackers to conduct absolute directory traversal attacks via a malformed UTF-8 character that is changed to a UTF-8 encoded slash.
Query: risk of Piriform CCleaner 3.26.0.1988 through 5.02.5101 writes the filenames to disk when overwriting files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by searching unallocat
Matching passage: CVE-2015-3999. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.0999999046325684. Piriform CCleaner 3.26.0.1988 through 5.02.5101 writes the filenames to disk when overwriting files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by searching unallocated disk space.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7412. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 2.5999999046325684. The GatewayScript modules on IBM DataPower Gateways with software 7.2.0.x before 7.2.0.1, when the GatewayScript decryption API or a JWE decrypt action is enabled, do not require signed ciphertext data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain plaintext data via a padding-oracle attack.
Query: EDR alert: possible System Information Discovery (T1082)
Matching passage: T1082 System Information Discovery. Tactics: discovery. Description: An adversary may attempt to get detailed information about the operating system and hardware, including version, patches, hotfixes, service packs, and architecture. Adversaries may use this information to shape follow-on behaviors, including whether or not the adversary fully infects the target and/or attempts specific actions. This behavior is distinct from [Local Storage Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1680) which is an adversary's discovery of local drive, disks and/or volumes. Tools such as [Systeminfo](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0096) can be used to gather detailed system information. If running with privileged access, a breakdown of system data can be gathered through the <code>systemsetup</code> configuration tool on macOS. Adversaries may leverage a [Network Device CLI](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/008) on network devices to gather detailed system information (e.g. <code>show version</code>).(Citation: US-CERT-TA18-106A) On ESXi servers, threat actors may gather system information from various esxcli utilities, such as `system hostname get` and `system version get`.(Citation: Crowdstrike Hypervisor Jackpotting Pt 2 2021)(Citation: Varonis) Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud providers such as AWS, GCP, and Azure allow access to instance and virtual machine information via APIs. Successful authenticated API calls can return data such as the operating system platform and status of a particular instance or the model view of a virtual machine.(Citation: Amazon Describe Instance)(Citation: Google Instances Resource)(Citation: Microsoft Virutal Machine API) [System Information Discovery](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1082) combined with information gathered from other forms of discovery and reconnaissance can drive payload development and concealment.(Citation: OSX.FairyTale)(Citation: 20 macOS Common Tools and Techniques)
Near-miss passage: T1069.001 Local Groups. Tactics: discovery. Description: Adversaries may attempt to find local system groups and permission settings. The knowledge of local system permission groups can help adversaries determine which groups exist and which users belong to a particular group. Adversaries may use this information to determine which users have elevated permissions, such as the users found within the local administrators group. Commands such as <code>net localgroup</code> of the [Net](https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0039) utility, <code>dscl . -list /Groups</code> on macOS, and <code>groups</code> on Linux can list local groups.
Query: Lateral movement indicators for Deploy Container
Matching passage: T1610 Deploy Container. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may deploy a container into an environment to facilitate execution or evade defenses. In some cases, adversaries may deploy a new container to execute processes associated with a particular image or deployment, such as processes that execute or download malware. In others, an adversary may deploy a new container configured without network rules, user limitations, etc. to bypass existing defenses within the environment. In Kubernetes environments, an adversary may attempt to deploy a privileged or vulnerable container into a specific node in order to [Escape to Host](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1611) and access other containers running on the node. (Citation: AppSecco Kubernetes Namespace Breakout 2020) Containers can be deployed by various means, such as via Docker's <code>create</code> and <code>start</code> APIs or via a web application such as the Kubernetes dashboard or Kubeflow. (Citation: Docker Container)(Citation: Kubernetes Dashboard)(Citation: Kubeflow Pipelines) In Kubernetes environments, containers may be deployed through workloads such as ReplicaSets or DaemonSets, which can allow containers to be deployed across multiple nodes.(Citation: Kubernetes Workload Management) Adversaries may deploy containers based on retrieved or built malicious images or from benign images that download and execute malicious payloads at runtime.(Citation: Aqua Build Images on Hosts)
Near-miss passage: T1559 Inter-Process Communication. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms for local code or command execution. IPC is typically used by processes to share data, communicate with each other, or synchronize execution. IPC is also commonly used to avoid situations such as deadlocks, which occurs when processes are stuck in a cyclic waiting pattern. Adversaries may abuse IPC to execute arbitrary code or commands. IPC mechanisms may differ depending on OS, but typically exists in a form accessible through programming languages/libraries or native interfaces such as Windows [Dynamic Data Exchange](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/002) or [Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1559/001). Linux environments support several different IPC mechanisms, two of which being sockets and pipes.(Citation: Linux IPC) Higher level execution mediums, such as those of [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059)s, may also leverage underlying IPC mechanisms. Adversaries may also use [Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021) such as [Distributed Component Object Model](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1021/003) to facilitate remote IPC execution.(Citation: Fireeye Hunting COM June 2019)