alirezaaminzadeh/secembed-pairs huggingface dataset:
Query: SOC alert related to Code Signing Certificates
Matching passage: T1588.003 Code Signing Certificates. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may buy and/or steal code signing certificates that can be used during targeting. Code signing is the process of digitally signing executables and scripts to confirm the software author and guarantee that the code has not been altered or corrupted. Code signing provides a level of authenticity for a program from the developer and a guarantee that the program has not been tampered with.(Citation: Wikipedia Code Signing) Users and/or security tools may trust a signed piece of code more than an unsigned piece of code even if they don't know who issued the certificate or who the author is. Prior to [Code Signing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1553/002), adversaries may purchase or steal code signing certificates for use in operations. The purchase of code signing certificates may be done using a front organization or using information stolen from a previously compromised entity that allows the adversary to validate to a certificate provider as that entity. Adversaries may also steal code signing materials directly from a compromised third-party.
Near-miss passage: T1588.004 Digital Certificates. Tactics: resource development. Description: Adversaries may buy and/or steal SSL/TLS certificates that can be used during targeting. SSL/TLS certificates are designed to instill trust. They include information about the key, information about its owner's identity, and the digital signature of an entity that has verified the certificate's contents are correct. If the signature is valid, and the person examining the certificate trusts the signer, then they know they can use that key to communicate with its owner. Adversaries may purchase or steal SSL/TLS certificates to further their operations, such as encrypting C2 traffic (ex: [Asymmetric Cryptography](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1573/002) with [Web Protocols](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1071/001)) or even enabling [Adversary-in-the-Middle](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1557) if the certificate is trusted or otherwise added to the root of trust (i.e. [Install Root Certificate](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1553/004)). The purchase of digital certificates may be done using a front organization or using information stolen from a previously compromised entity that allows the adversary to validate to a certificate provider as that entity. Adversaries may also steal certificate materials directly from a compromised third-party, including from certificate authorities.(Citation: DiginotarCompromise) Adversaries may register or hijack domains that they will later purchase an SSL/TLS certificate for. Certificate authorities exist that allow adversaries to acquire SSL/TLS certificates, such as domain validation certificates, for free.(Citation: Let's Encrypt FAQ) After obtaining a digital certificate, an adversary may then install that certificate (see [Install Digital Certificate](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1608/003)) on infrastructure under their control.
Query: risk of The portal in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience before 8.7.1.8814, 8.8 before 8.8.0.9026, 9.0.0, 9.0.0A, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1083, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5073, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1095, a
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4989. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 3.700000047683716. The portal in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience before 8.7.1.8814, 8.8 before 8.8.0.9026, 9.0.0, 9.0.0A, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1083, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5073, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1095, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5144 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary charts by specifying an internal chart name.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8251. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.900000095367432. OpenStage 60 and OpenScape Desk Phone IP 55G SIP V3, OpenStage 15, 20E, 20 and 40 and OpenScape Desk Phone IP 35G SIP V3, OpenScape Desk Phone IP 35G Eco SIP V3, OpenStage 60 and OpenScape Desk Phone IP 55G HFA V3, OpenStage 15, 20E, 20, and 40 and OpenScape Desk Phone IP 35G HFA V3, and OpenScape Desk Phone IP 35G Eco HFA V3 use non-unique X.509 certificates and SSH host keys.
Query: describe CVE-2015-4262
Matching passage: CVE-2015-4262. CWE: CWE-255. CVSS: 10.0. The password-change feature in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing before 8.5(5) MR3 and 8.6 before 8.6(2) does not check the session ID or require entry of the current password, which allows remote attackers to reset arbitrary passwords via a crafted HTTP request, aka Bug ID CSCuu51839.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6742. CWE: CWE-255. CVSS: 6.5. Basware Banking (Maksuliikenne) before 8.90.07.X uses a hardcoded password for the ANCO account, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging knowledge of this password. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0942 per ADT2 and ADT3 due to different vulnerability types and different affected versions.
Query: describe CVE-2015-7754
Matching passage: CVE-2015-7754. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 8.100000381469727. Juniper ScreenOS before 6.3.0r21, when ssh-pka is configured and enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) or execute arbitrary code via crafted SSH negotiation.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-5195. CWE: CWE-20. CVSS: 7.5. ntp_openssl.m4 in ntpd in NTP before 4.2.7p112 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a crafted statistics or filegen configuration command that is not enabled during compilation.
Query: rule covering Detects programs that connect to known malware callback ports based on statistical analysis from two different sandbox s
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects programs that connect to known malware callback ports based on statistical analysis from two different sandbox s. Logsource: windows / network_connection. Rule: title: Potentially Suspicious Malware Callback Communication id: 4b89abaa-99fe-4232-afdd-8f9aa4d20382 related: - id: 6d8c3d20-a5e1-494f-8412-4571d716cf5c type: similar status: test description: 'Detects programs that connect to known malware callback ports based on statistical analysis from two different sandbox system databases ' references: - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17pSTDNpa0sf6pHeRhusvWG6rThciE8CsXTSlDUAZDyo author: Florian Roth (Nextron Systems) date: 2017-03-19 modified: 2024-03-12 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.command-and-control - attack.t1571 logsource: category: network_connection product: windows detection: selection: Initiated: 'true' DestinationPort: - 100 - 198 - 200 - 243 - 473 - 666 - 700 - 743 - 777 - 1443 - 1515 - 1777 - 1817 - 1904 - 1960 - 2443 - 2448 - 3360 - 3675 - 3939 - 4040 - 4433 - 4438 - 4443 - 4444 - 4455 - 5445 - 5552 - 5649 - 6625 - 7210 - 7777 - 8143 - 8843 - 9631 - 9943 - 10101 - 12102 - 12103 - 12322 - 13145 - 13394 - 13504 - 13505 - 13506 - 13507 - 14102 - 14103 - 14154 - 49180 - 65520 - 65535 filter_main_local_ranges: DestinationIp|cidr: - 127.0.0.0/8 - 10.0.0.0/8 - 172.16.0.0/12 - 192.168.0.0/16 - 169.254.0.0/16 - ::1/128 - fe80::/10 - fc00::/7 filter_optional_sys_directories: Image|startswith: - C:\Program Files\ - C:\Program Files (x86)\ condition: selection and not 1 of filter_main_* and not 1 of filter_optional_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects shell32.dll executing a DLL in a suspicious directory. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Shell32 DLL Execution in Suspicious Directory id: 32b96012-7892-429e-b26c-ac2bf46066ff status: test description: Detects shell32.dll executing a DLL in a suspicious directory references: - https://www.group-ib.com/resources/threat-research/red-curl-2.html author: Christian Burkard (Nextron Systems) date: 2021-11-24 modified: 2023-02-09 tags: - attack.execution - attack.stealth - attack.t1218.011 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \rundll32.exe - OriginalFileName: RUNDLL32.EXE selection_cli: CommandLine|contains|all: - shell32.dll - Control_RunDLL CommandLine|contains: - '%AppData%' - '%LocalAppData%' - '%Temp%' - '%tmp%' - \AppData\ - \Temp\ - \Users\Public\ condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unknown level: high
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-5298
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5298. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 6.5. The Google Login Plugin (versions 1.0 and 1.1) allows malicious anonymous users to authenticate successfully against Jenkins instances that are supposed to be locked down to a particular Google Apps domain through client-side request modification.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7871. CWE: CWE-287. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. Crypto-NAK packets in ntpd in NTP 4.2.x before 4.2.8p4, and 4.3.x before 4.3.77 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-8530
Matching passage: CVE-2015-8530. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 6.5. Stack-based buffer overflow in the Initialize function in an ActiveX control in IBM SPSS Statistics 19 and 20 before 20.0.0.2-IF0008, 21 before 21.0.0.2-IF0010, 22 before 22.0.0.2-IF0011, 23 before 23.0.0.3-IF0001, and 24 before 24.0.0.0-IF0003 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-8319. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 7.800000190734863. Heap-based buffer overflow in the HIFI driver in Huawei P8 smartphones with software GRA-TL00 before GRA-TL00C01B230, GRA-CL00 before GRA-CL00C92B230, GRA-CL10 before GRA-CL10C92B230, GRA-UL00 before GRA-UL00C00B230, and GRA-UL10 before GRA-UL10C00B230, and Mate S smartphones with software CRR-TL00 before CRR-TL00C01B160SP01, CRR-UL00 before CRR-UL00C00B160, and CRR-CL00 before CRR-CL00C92B161 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) or gain privileges via a crafted application, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8318.
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-1799
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1799. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 4.300000190734863. The symmetric-key feature in the receive function in ntp_proto.c in ntpd in NTP 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.8p2 performs state-variable updates upon receiving certain invalid packets, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to cause a denial of service (synchronization loss) by spoofing the source IP address of a peer.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7192. CWE: CWE-17. CVSS: 7.5. The accessibility-tools feature in Mozilla Firefox before 42.0 on OS X improperly interacts with the implementation of the TABLE element, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by using an NSAccessibilityIndexAttribute value to reference a row index.
Query: vulnerability: Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.232 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.508 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.199, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.199, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compile
Matching passage: CVE-2015-5549. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 10.0. Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.232 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.508 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.199, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.199, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 18.0.0.199 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5544, CVE-2015-5545, CVE-2015-5546, CVE-2015-5547, CVE-2015-5548, CVE-2015-5552, and CVE-2015-5553.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-9205. CWE: CWE-119. CVSS: 9.800000190734863. In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 808, and SD 810, in a PlayReady API function, a buffer over-read can occur.
Query: actor TTPs: Active Scanning
Matching passage: T1595 Active Scanning. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may execute active reconnaissance scans to gather information that can be used during targeting. Active scans are those where the adversary probes victim infrastructure via network traffic, as opposed to other forms of reconnaissance that do not involve direct interaction. Adversaries may perform different forms of active scanning depending on what information they seek to gather. These scans can also be performed in various ways, including using native features of network protocols such as ICMP.(Citation: Botnet Scan)(Citation: OWASP Fingerprinting) Information from these scans may reveal opportunities for other forms of reconnaissance (ex: [Search Open Websites/Domains](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1593) or [Search Open Technical Databases](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1596)), establishing operational resources (ex: [Develop Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1587) or [Obtain Capabilities](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1588)), and/or initial access (ex: [External Remote Services](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1133) or [Exploit Public-Facing Application](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1190)).
Near-miss passage: T1595.003 Wordlist Scanning. Tactics: reconnaissance. Description: Adversaries may iteratively probe infrastructure using brute-forcing and crawling techniques. While this technique employs similar methods to [Brute Force](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110), its goal is the identification of content and infrastructure rather than the discovery of valid credentials. Wordlists used in these scans may contain generic, commonly used names and file extensions or terms specific to a particular software. Adversaries may also create custom, target-specific wordlists using data gathered from other Reconnaissance techniques (ex: [Gather Victim Org Information](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1591), or [Search Victim-Owned Websites](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1594)). For example, adversaries may use web content discovery tools such as Dirb, DirBuster, and GoBuster and generic or custom wordlists to enumerate a website’s pages and directories.(Citation: ClearSky Lebanese Cedar Jan 2021) This can help them to discover old, vulnerable pages or hidden administrative portals that could become the target of further operations (ex: [Exploit Public-Facing Application](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1190) or [Brute Force](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1110)). As cloud storage solutions typically use globally unique names, adversaries may also use target-specific wordlists and tools such as s3recon and GCPBucketBrute to enumerate public and private buckets on cloud infrastructure.(Citation: S3Recon GitHub)(Citation: GCPBucketBrute) Once storage objects are discovered, adversaries may leverage [Data from Cloud Storage](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1530) to access valuable information that can be exfiltrated or used to escalate privileges and move laterally.
Query: Multiple failed authentications followed by AutoHotKey & AutoIT
Matching passage: T1059.010 AutoHotKey & AutoIT. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may execute commands and perform malicious tasks using AutoIT and AutoHotKey automation scripts. AutoIT and AutoHotkey (AHK) are scripting languages that enable users to automate Windows tasks. These automation scripts can be used to perform a wide variety of actions, such as clicking on buttons, entering text, and opening and closing programs.(Citation: AutoIT)(Citation: AutoHotKey) Adversaries may use AHK (`.ahk`) and AutoIT (`.au3`) scripts to execute malicious code on a victim's system. For example, adversaries have used for AHK to execute payloads and other modular malware such as keyloggers. Adversaries have also used custom AHK files containing embedded malware as [Phishing](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1566) payloads.(Citation: Splunk DarkGate) These scripts may also be compiled into self-contained executable payloads (`.exe`).(Citation: AutoIT)(Citation: AutoHotKey)
Near-miss passage: T1059.011 Lua. Tactics: execution. Description: Adversaries may abuse Lua commands and scripts for execution. Lua is a cross-platform scripting and programming language primarily designed for embedded use in applications. Lua can be executed on the command-line (through the stand-alone lua interpreter), via scripts (<code>.lua</code>), or from Lua-embedded programs (through the <code>struct lua_State</code>).(Citation: Lua main page)(Citation: Lua state) Lua scripts may be executed by adversaries for malicious purposes. Adversaries may incorporate, abuse, or replace existing Lua interpreters to allow for malicious Lua command execution at runtime.(Citation: PoetRat Lua)(Citation: Lua Proofpoint Sunseed)(Citation: Cyphort EvilBunny)(Citation: Kaspersky Lua)
Query: Sigma rule for Detects when an attacker register a new SIP provider for persistence and defense evasion
Matching passage: Sigma rule: Detects when an attacker register a new SIP provider for persistence and defense evasion. Logsource: windows / registry_set. Rule: title: Persistence Via New SIP Provider id: 5a2b21ee-6aaa-4234-ac9d-59a59edf90a1 status: test description: Detects when an attacker register a new SIP provider for persistence and defense evasion references: - https://persistence-info.github.io/Data/codesigning.html - https://github.com/gtworek/PSBits/tree/master/SIP - https://specterops.io/assets/resources/SpecterOps_Subverting_Trust_in_Windows.pdf author: Nasreddine Bencherchali (Nextron Systems) date: 2022-07-21 modified: 2023-08-17 tags: - attack.persistence - attack.defense-impairment - attack.t1553.003 logsource: category: registry_set product: windows detection: selection_root: TargetObject|contains: - \SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\Providers\ - \SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType - \SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Cryptography\Providers\ - \SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType selection_dll: TargetObject|contains: - \Dll - \$DLL filter: Details: - WINTRUST.DLL - mso.dll filter_poqexec: Image: C:\Windows\System32\poqexec.exe TargetObject|contains: \CryptSIPDll Details: C:\Windows\System32\PsfSip.dll condition: all of selection_* and not 1 of filter* falsepositives: - Legitimate SIP being registered by the OS or different software. level: medium
Near-miss passage: Sigma rule: Detects the abuse of the Print.exe utility for credential harvesting which involves using Print.Exe to copy sensitive fi. Logsource: windows / process_creation. Rule: title: Sensitive File Dump Via Print.EXE id: 2fcda7e2-8c57-4904-86ac-37fc3157e09d status: test description: 'Detects the abuse of the Print.exe utility for credential harvesting which involves using Print.Exe to copy sensitive files such as ntds.dit, SAM, SECURITY, or SYSTEM from the Windows directory in order to extract credentials, locally or remotely. ' references: - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2026/02/06/active-exploitation-solarwinds-web-help-desk/ - https://www.huntress.com/blog/credential-theft-expanding-your-reach-pt-2 - https://lolbas-project.github.io/lolbas/Binaries/Print/ author: Ayush Anand (Securityinbits) date: 2026-04-28 tags: - attack.credential-access - attack.stealth - attack.t1003.003 - attack.t1003.002 - attack.t1218 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection_img: - Image|endswith: \print.exe - OriginalFileName: Print.EXE selection_cli: CommandLine|contains|windash: /D CommandLine|contains: - \config\SAM - \config\SECURITY - \config\SYSTEM - \windows\ntds\ntds.dit condition: all of selection_* falsepositives: - Unlikely level: high regression_tests_path: regression_data/rules/windows/process_creation/proc_creation_win_print_dump_sensitive_files/info.yml
Query: CVE similar to CVE-2015-1831
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1831. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 7.5. The default exclude patterns (excludeParams) in Apache Struts 2.3.20 allow remote attackers to "compromise internal state of an application" via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-6717. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 6.800000190734863. The DynamicAnnotStore method in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.16 and 11.x before 11.0.13, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 2015.006.30094, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 2015.009.20069 on Windows and OS X allows attackers to bypass JavaScript API execution restrictions via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-6707, CVE-2015-6708, CVE-2015-6709, CVE-2015-6710, CVE-2015-6711, CVE-2015-6712, CVE-2015-6713, CVE-2015-6714, CVE-2015-6715, CVE-2015-6716, CVE-2015-6718, CVE-2015-6719, CVE-2015-6720, CVE-2015-6721, CVE-2015-6722, CVE-2015-6723, CVE-2015-6724, CVE-2015-6725, CVE-2015-7614, CVE-2015-7616, CVE-2015-7618, CVE-2015-7619, CVE-2015-7620, and CVE-2015-7623.
Query: patch priority for CVE-2015-2050
Matching passage: CVE-2015-2050. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 10.0. D-Link DAP-1320 Rev Ax with firmware before 1.21b05 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-7069. CWE: UNKNOWN. CVSS: 9.300000190734863. Mobile Replayer in GPUTools Framework in Apple iOS before 9.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in a privileged context via an app that provides a crafted pathname, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7070.
Query: vulnerability: The Multicast DNS (mDNS) responder in IBM Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP12 and 8.x before 8.0.1 FP1 inadvertently responds to unicast queries with source addre
Matching passage: CVE-2015-1892. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. The Multicast DNS (mDNS) responder in IBM Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP12 and 8.x before 8.0.1 FP1 inadvertently responds to unicast queries with source addresses that are not link-local, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (traffic amplification) or obtain potentially sensitive information via port-5353 UDP packets.
Near-miss passage: CVE-2015-3752. CWE: CWE-200. CVSS: 5.0. The Content Security Policy implementation in WebKit in Apple Safari before 6.2.8, 7.x before 7.1.8, and 8.x before 8.0.8, as used in iOS before 8.4.1 and other products, does not properly restrict cookie transmission for report requests, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via vectors involving (1) a cross-origin request or (2) a private-browsing request.