user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Understanding Attention Mechanisms

Paper content:
Attention mechanisms have advanced the state of the art in several machine learning tasks.
Despite significant empirical gains, there is a lack of theoretical analyses on understanding their effectiveness.
In this paper, we address this problem by studying the landscape of population and empirical loss functions of attention-based neural networks.
Our results show that, under mild assumptions, every local minimum of a two-layer global attention model has low prediction error, and attention models require lower sample complexity than models not employing attention.
We then extend our analyses to the popular self-attention model, proving that they deliver consistent predictions with a more expressive class of functions.
Additionally, our theoretical results provide several guidelines for designing attention mechanisms.
Our findings are validated with satisfactory experimental results on MNIST and IMDB reviews dataset.
Significant research in machine learning has focused on designing network architectures for superior performance, faster convergence and better generalization.
Attention mechanisms are one such design choice that is widely used in many natural language processing and computer vision tasks.
Inspired by human cognition, attention mechanisms advocate focusing on the relevant regions of input data to solve a desired task rather than ingesting the entire input.
Several variants of attention mechanisms have been proposed, and they have advanced the state of the art in machine translation (Bahdanau et al., 2014; Luong et al., 2015; Vaswani et al., 2017) , image captioning (Xu et al., 2015) , video captioning (Pu et al., 2018) , visual question answering (Lu et al., 2016) , generative modeling (Zhang et al., 2018) , etc.
In computer vision, spatial/ spatio-temporal attention masks are employed to focus only on the relevant regions of images/ video frames for the underlying downstream task (Mnih et al., 2014) .
In natural language tasks, where input-output pairs are sequential data, attention mechanisms focus on the most relevant elements in the input sequence to predict each symbol of the output sequence.
Hidden state representations of a recurrent neural network are typically used to compute these attention masks.
The most popular implementation of this paradigm is self-attention (Vaswani et al., 2017) , which uses correlation among the elements of the input sequence to learn an attention mask.
Substantial empirical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of attention mechanisms motivates us to study the problem from a theoretical lens.
In this work, we attempt to understand the loss landscape of neural networks employing attention.
Analyzing the loss landscape and optimization of neural networks is an open area of research, and is a challenging problem even for two-layer neural networks (Poggio & Liao, 2017; Rister & Rubin, 2017; Soudry & Hoffer, 2018; Zhou & Feng, 2017; Mei et al., 2018b; Soltanolkotabi et al., 2017; Ge et al., 2017; Nguyen & Hein, 2017a; Arora et al., 2018) .
Convergence of gradient descent for two-layer neural networks has been studied in Mei et al., 2018b; Du et al., 2019) .
Ge et al. (2017) shows that there is no bad local minima for two-layer neural nets under a specific loss landscape design.
Unfortunately, these results cannot directly be applied to attention mechanisms, as attention modifies the network structure and introduces additional parameters which are jointly optimized with the model.
To the best of our knowledge, our work presents the first theoretical analysis on attention-based models.
Our main result shows that, under some mild conditions, every stationary point of attention models achieve a low prediction error.
We perform an asymptotic analysis where we show that expected prediction on error goes to 0 as n → ∞.
We also show that attention models achieve lower sample complexity than the models not employing attention.
We then discuss how the result can be extended to recurrent attention and multi layer cases, and discuss the effect of regularization.
In addition, we show how attention further helps improve the loss landscape by studying three properties: number of linear regions, flatness of local minima and small sample size training.
We validate our theoretical results with experiments on MNIST and IMDB reviews dataset.
In this paper, we study the loss landscape of two-layer neural networks on global and self attention models, and show that attention mechanisms help reduce the sample complexity and achieve consistent predictions in the large sample regime.
Additionally, by analyzing the number of linear regions, the loss landscape under small sample regime, and flatness of local minima, we demonstrate that attention mechanisms produce a well behaved loss landscape that leads to a good minima.
Extensive empirical studies on NoisyMNIST dataset and IMDB reviews dataset validate our theoretical findings.

assistant: text: This paper proves from the theoretical perspective that attention networks can generalize better than non-attention baselines for fixed-attention (single-layer and multi-layer) and self-attention in the single layer setting.