user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: How much Position Information Do Convolutional Neural Networks Encode?

Paper content:
In contrast to fully connected networks, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) achieve efficiency by learning weights associated with local filters with a finite spatial extent.
An implication of this is that a filter may know what it is looking at, but not where it is positioned in the image.
Information concerning absolute position is inherently useful, and it is reasonable to assume that deep CNNs may implicitly learn to encode this information if there is a means to do so.
In this paper, we test this hypothesis revealing the surprising degree of absolute position information that is encoded in commonly used neural networks.
A comprehensive set of experiments show the validity of this hypothesis and shed light on how and where this information is represented while offering clues to where positional information is derived from in deep CNNs.
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art results in many computer vision tasks, e.g. object classification (Simonyan & Zisserman, 2014; and detection (Redmon et al., 2015; , face recognition (Taigman et al., 2014) , semantic segmentation (Long et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018; Noh et al., 2015) and saliency detection (Cornia et al., 2018; Li et al., 2014) .
However, CNNs have faced some criticism in the context of deep learning for the lack of interpretability (Lipton, 2016) .
The classic CNN model is considered to be spatially-agnostic and therefore capsule (Sabour et al., 2017) or recurrent networks (Visin et al., 2015) have been utilized to model relative spatial relationships within learned feature layers.
It is unclear if CNNs capture any absolute spatial information which is important in position-dependent tasks (e.g. semantic segmentation and salient object detection).
As shown in Fig. 1 , the regions determined to be most salient (Jia & Bruce, 2018) tend to be near the center of an image.
While detecting saliency on a cropped version of the images, the most salient region shifts even though the visual features have not been changed.
This is somewhat surprising, given the limited spatial extent of CNN filters through which the image is interpreted.
In this paper, we examine the role of absolute position information by performing a series of randomization tests with the hypothesis that CNNs might indeed learn to encode position information as a cue for decision making.
Our experiments reveal that position information is implicitly learned from the commonly used padding operation (zero-padding).
Zero-padding is widely used for keeping the same dimensionality when applying convolution.
However, its hidden effect in representation learning has been long omitted.
This work helps to better understand the nature of the learned features in CNNs and highlights an important observation and fruitful direction for future investigation.
Previous works try to visualize learned feature maps to demystify how CNNs work.
A simple idea is to compute losses and pass these backwards to the input space to generate a pattern image that can maximize the activation of a given unit (Hinton et al., 2006; Erhan et al., 2009) .
However, it is very difficult to model such relationships when the number of layers grows.
Recent work (Zeiler & Fergus, 2013 ) presents a non-parametric method for visualization.
A deconvolutional network (Zeiler et al., 2011 ) is leveraged to map learned features back to the input space and their results reveal what types of patterns a feature map actually learns.
Another work (Selvaraju et al., 2016) proposes to combine pixel-level gradients with weighted class activation mapping to locate the region which maximizes class-specific activation.
As an alternative to visualization strategies, an empirical study (Zhang et al., 2016) has shown that a simple network can achieve zero training Cropping results in a shift in position rightward of features relative to the centre.
It is notable that this has a significant impact on output and decision of regions deemed salient despite no explicit position encoding and a modest change to position in the input.
loss on noisy labels.
We share the similar idea of applying a randomization test to study the CNN learned features.
However, our work differs from existing approaches in that these techniques only present interesting visualizations or understanding, but fail to shed any light on spatial relationships encoded by a CNN model.
In summary, CNNs have emerged as a way of dealing with the prohibitive number of weights that would come with a fully connected end-to-end network.
A trade-off resulting from this is that kernels and their learned weights only have visibility of a small subset of the image.
This would seem to imply solutions where networks rely more on cues such as texture and color rather than shape (Baker et al., 2018) .
Nevertheless, position information provides a powerful cue for where objects might appear in an image (e.g. birds in the sky).
It is conceivable that networks might rely sufficiently on such cues that they implicitly encode spatial position along with the features they represent.
It is our hypothesis that deep neural networks succeed in part by learning both what and where things are.
This paper tests this hypothesis, and provides convincing evidence that CNNs do indeed rely on and learn information about spatial positioning in the image to a much greater extent than one might expect.
In this paper we explore the hypothesis that absolute position information is implicitly encoded in convolutional neural networks.
Experiments reveal that positional information is available to a strong degree.
More detailed experiments show that larger receptive fields or non-linear readout of positional information further augments the readout of absolute position, which is already very strong from a trivial single layer 3 × 3 PosENet.
Experiments also reveal that this recovery is possible when no semantic cues are present and interference from semantic information suggests joint encoding of what (semantic features) and where (absolute position).
Results point to zero padding and borders as an anchor from which spatial information is derived and eventually propagated over the whole image as spatial abstraction occurs.
These results demonstrate a fundamental property of CNNs that was unknown to date, and for which much further exploration is warranted.

assistant: text: Our work shows positional information has been implicitly encoded in a network. This information is important for detecting position-dependent features, e.g. semantic and saliency.