user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: ``"Best-of-Many-Samples" Distribution Matching

Paper content:
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can achieve state-of-the-art sample quality in generative modelling tasks but suffer from the mode collapse problem.
Variational Autoencoders (VAE) on the other hand explicitly maximize a reconstruction-based data log-likelihood forcing it to cover all modes, but suffer from poorer sample quality.
Recent works have proposed hybrid VAE-GAN frameworks which integrate a GAN-based synthetic likelihood to the VAE objective to address both the mode collapse and sample quality issues, with limited success.
This is because the VAE objective forces a trade-off between the data log-likelihood and divergence to the latent prior.
The synthetic likelihood ratio term also shows instability during training.
We propose a novel objective with a ``"Best-of-Many-Samples" reconstruction cost and a stable direct estimate of the synthetic likelihood.
This enables our hybrid VAE-GAN framework to achieve high data log-likelihood and low divergence to the latent prior at the same time and shows significant improvement over both hybrid VAE-GANS and plain GANs in mode coverage and quality.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) (Goodfellow et al., 2014) have achieved state-of-the-art sample quality in generative modeling tasks.
However, GANs do not explicitly estimate the data likelihood.
Instead, it aims to "fool" an adversary, so that the adversary is unable to distinguish between samples from the true distribution and the generated samples.
This leads to the generation of high quality samples (Adler & Lunz, 2018; Brock et al., 2019) .
However, there is no incentive to cover the whole data distribution.
Entire modes of the true data distribution can be missedcommonly referred to as the mode collapse problem.
In contrast, the Variational Auto-Encoders (VAEs) (Kingma & Welling, 2014) explicitly maximize data likelihood and can be forced to cover all modes (Bozkurt et al., 2018; Shu et al., 2018) .
VAEs enable sampling by constraining the latent space to a unit Gaussian and sampling through the latent space.
However, VAEs maximize a data likelihood estimate based on the L 1 /L 2 reconstruction cost which leads to lower overall sample quality -blurriness in case of image distributions.
Therefore, there has been a spur of recent work (Donahue et al., 2017; Larsen et al., 2016; Rosca et al., 2019) which aims integrate GANs in a VAE framework to improve VAE generation quality while covering all the modes.
Notably in Rosca et al. (2019) , GANs are integrated in a VAE framework by augmenting the L 1 /L 2 data likelihood term in the VAE objective with a GAN discriminator based synthetic likelihood ratio term.
However, Rosca et al. (2019) reports that in case of hybrid VAE-GANs, the latent space does not usually match the Gaussian prior.
This is because, the reconstruction log-likelihood in the VAE objective is at odds with the divergence to the latent prior (Tabor et al., 2018) (also in case of alternatives proposed by Makhzani et al. (2016) ; ).
This problem is further exacerbated with the addition of the synthetic likelihood term in the hybrid VAE-GAN objective -it is necessary for sample quality but it introduces additional constraints on the encoder/decoder.
This leads to the degradation in the quality and diversity of samples.
Moreover, the synthetic likelihood ratio term is unstable during training -as it is the ratio of outputs of a classifier, any instability in the output of the classifier is magnified.
We directly estimate the ratio using a network with a controlled Lipschitz constant, which leads to significantly improved stability.
Our contributions in detail are,
1. We propose a novel objective for training hybrid VAE-GAN frameworks, which relaxes the constraints on the encoder by giving the encoder multiple chances to draw samples with high likelihood enabling it to generate realistic images while covering all modes of the data distribution,
2. Our novel objective directly estimates the synthetic likelihood term with a controlled Lipschitz constant for stability,
3. Finally, we demonstrate significant improvement over prior hybrid VAE-GANs and plain GANs on highly muti-modal synthetic data, CIFAR-10 and CelebA.
We further compare our BMS-VAE-GAN to state-of-the-art GANs using the Standard CNN architecture in Table 6 with 100k generator iterations.
Our α-GAN + SN ablation significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art plain GANs (Adler & Lunz, 2018; Miyato et al., 2018) , showing the effectiveness of hybrid VAE-GANs with a stable direct estimate of the synthetic likelihood on this highly diverse dataset.
Furthermore, our BMS-VAE-GAN model trained using the best of T = 30 samples significantly improves over the α-GAN + SN baseline (23.4 vs 24.6 FID), showing the effectiveness of our "Best-of-Many-Samples".
We also compare to Tran et al. (2018) using 300k generator iterations, again outperforming by a significant margin (21.8 vs 22.9 FID).
The IoVM metric of Srivastava et al. (2017) (Tables 4 and 5 ), illustrates that we are also able to better reconstruct the image distribution.
The improvement in both sample quality as measured by the FID metric and data reconstruction as measured by the IoVM metric shows that our novel "Best-of-Many-Samples" objective helps us both match the prior in the latent space and achieve high data log-likelihood at the same time.
We train all models for 200k iterations and report the FID scores (Heusel et al., 2017) for all models using 10k/10k real/generated samples in Table 7 .
The pure auto-encoding based WAE (Tolstikhin et al., 2018) has the weakest performance due to blurriness.
Our pure autoencoding BMS-VAE (without synthetic likelihoods) improves upon the WAE (39.8 vs 41.2 FID), already demonstrating the effectiveness of using "Best-of-Many-Samples".
We see that the base DCGAN has the weakest performance among the GANs.
BEGAN suffers from partial mode collapse.
The SN-GAN improves upon WGAN-GP, showing the effectiveness of Spectral Normalization.
However, there exists considerable artifacts in its generations.
The α-GAN of Rosca et al. (2019) , which integrates the base DCGAN in its framework performs significantly better (31.1 vs 19.2 FID).
This shows the effectiveness of VAE-GAN frameworks in increasing quality and diversity of generations.
Our enhanced α-GAN + SN regularized with Spectral Normalization performs significantly better (15.1 vs 19.2 FID).
This shows the effectiveness of a regularized direct estimate of the synthetic likelihood.
Using the gradient penalty regularizer of Gulrajani et al. (2017) lead to drop of 0.4 FID.
Our BMS-VAE-GAN improves significantly over the α-GAN + SN baseline using the "Best-of-Many-Samples" (13.6 vs 15.1 FID).
The results at 128×128 resolution mirror the results at 64×64.
We additionally evaluate using the IoVM metric in Appendix C. We see that by using the "Best-of-Many-Samples" we obtain sharper ( Figure 4d ) results that cover more of the data distribution as shown by both the FID and IoVM.
We propose a new objective for training hybrid VAE-GAN frameworks which overcomes key limitations of current hybrid VAE-GANs.
We integrate,
1. A "Best-of-Many-Samples" reconstruction likelihood which helps in covering all the modes of the data distribution while maintaining a latent space as close to Gaussian as possible,
2. A stable estimate of the synthetic likelihood ratio..
Our hybrid VAE-GAN framework outperforms state-of-the-art hybrid VAE-GANs and plain GANs in generative modelling on CelebA and CIFAR-10, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.

assistant: text: We propose a new objective for training hybrid VAE-GANs which lead to significant improvement in mode coverage and quality.