user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Adv-BNN: Improved Adversarial Defense through Robust Bayesian Neural Network

Paper content:
We present a new algorithm to train a robust neural network against adversarial attacks.
Our algorithm is motivated by the following two ideas.
First, although recent work has demonstrated that fusing randomness can improve the robustness of neural networks (Liu 2017), we noticed that adding noise blindly to all the layers is not the optimal way to incorporate randomness.
Instead, we model randomness under the framework of Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) to formally learn the posterior distribution of models in a scalable way.
Second, we formulate the mini-max problem in BNN to learn the best model distribution under adversarial attacks, leading to an adversarial-trained Bayesian neural net.
Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance under strong attacks.
On CIFAR-10 with VGG network, our model leads to 14% accuracy improvement compared with adversarial training (Madry 2017) and random self-ensemble (Liu, 2017) under PGD attack with 0.035 distortion, and the gap becomes even larger on a subset of ImageNet.
Deep neural networks have demonstrated state-of-the-art performances on many difficult machine learning tasks.
Despite the fundamental breakthroughs in various tasks, deep neural networks have been shown to be utterly vulnerable to adversarial attacks BID32 BID11 .
Carefully crafted perturbations can be added to the inputs of the targeted model to drive the performances of deep neural networks to chance-level.
In the context of image classification, these perturbations are imperceptible to human eyes but can change the prediction of the classification model to the wrong class.
Algorithms seek to find such perturbations are denoted as adversarial attacks BID5 BID4 BID28 , and some attacks are still effective in the physical world BID17 BID9 .
The inherent weakness of lacking robustness to adversarial examples for deep neural networks brings out security concerns, especially for security-sensitive applications which require strong reliability.To defend from adversarial examples and improve the robustness of neural networks, many algorithms have been recently proposed BID27 BID37 BID17 BID12 .
Among them, there are two lines of work showing effective results on medium-sized data (e.g., CIFAR-10).
The first line of work uses adversarial training to improve robustness, and the recent algorithm proposed in BID25 has been recognized as one of the most successful defenses, as shown in .
The second line of work adds stochastic components in the neural network to hide gradient information from attackers.
In the black-box setting, stochastic outputs can significantly increase query counts for attacks using finite-difference techniques BID5 , and even in the white-box setting the recent Random Self-Ensemble (RSE) approach proposed by BID23 achieves similar performance to Madry's adversarial training algorithm.In this paper, we propose a new defense algorithm called Adv-BNN.
The idea is to combine adversarial training and Bayesian network, although trying BNNs in adversarial attacks is not new (e.g. BID20 BID10 BID30 ), and very recently BID36 also tried to combine Bayesian learning with adversarial training, this is the first time we scale the problem to complex data and our approach achieves better robustness than previous defense methods.
The contributions of this paper can be summarized below:• Instead of adding randomness to the input of each layer (as what has been done in RSE), we directly assume all the weights in the network are stochastic and conduct training with techniques commonly used in Bayesian Neural Network (BNN).•
We propose a new mini-max formulation to combine adversarial training with BNN, and show the problem can be solved by alternating between projected gradient descent and SGD.•
We test the proposed Adv-BNN approach on CIFAR10, STL10 and ImageNet143 datasets, and show significant improvement over previous approaches including RSE and adversarial training.Notations A neural network parameterized by weights w ∈ R d is denoted by f (x; w), where x ∈ R p is an input example and y is the corresponding label, the training/testing dataset is D tr/te with size N tr/te respectively. When
necessary, we abuse D tr/te to define the empirical distribu- DISPLAYFORM0 δ(x i )δ(y i ), where δ(·) is the Dirac delta function. x o
represents the original input and x adv denotes the adversarial example. The
loss function is represented as f (x i ; w), y i , where i is the index of the data point. Our
approach works for any loss but we consider the cross-entropy loss in all the experiments. The
adversarial perturbation is denoted as ξ ∈ R p , and adversarial example is generated by x adv = x o + ξ. In
this paper, we focus on the attack under norm constraint BID25 , so that ξ ≤ γ. In
order to align with the previous works, in the experiments we set the norm to · ∞ . The
Hadamard product is denoted as .
To conclude, we find that although the Bayesian neural network has no defense functionality, when combined with adversarial training, its robustness against adversarial attack increases significantly.
So this method can be regarded as a non-trivial combination of BNN and the adversarial training: robust classification relies on the controlled local Lipschitz value, while adversarial training does not generalize this property well enough to the test set; if we train the BNN with adversarial examples, the robustness increases by a large margin.
Admittedly, our method is still far from the ideal case, and it is still an open problem on what the optimal defense solution will be.

assistant: text: We design an adversarial training method to Bayesian neural networks, showing a much stronger defense to white-box adversarial attacks