user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: The Blessing of Dimensionality: An Empirical Study of Generalization

Paper content:
The power of neural networks lies in their ability to generalize to unseen data, yet the underlying reasons for this phenomenon remain elusive.
Numerous rigorous attempts have been made to explain generalization, but available bounds are still quite loose, and analysis does not always lead to true understanding.
The goal of this work is to make generalization more intuitive.
Using visualization methods, we discuss the mystery of generalization, the geometry of loss landscapes, and how the curse (or, rather, the blessing) of dimensionality causes optimizers to settle into minima that generalize well.
Neural networks are a powerful tool for solving classification problems.
The power of these models is due in part to their expressiveness; they have many parameters that can be efficiently optimized to fit nearly any finite training set.
However, the real power of neural network models comes from their ability to generalize; they often make accurate predictions on test data that were not seen during training, provided the test data is sampled from the same distribution as the training data.
The generalization ability of neural networks is seemingly at odds with their expressiveness.
Neural network training algorithms work by minimizing a loss function that measures model performance using only training data.
Because of their flexibility, it is possible to find parameter configurations Figure 1: A minefield of bad minima: we train a neural net classifier and plot the iterates of SGD after each tenth epoch (red dots).
We also plot locations of nearby "bad" minima with poor generalization (blue dots).
We visualize these using t-SNE embedding.
All blue dots achieve near perfect train accuracy, but with test accuracy below 53% (random chance is 50%).
The final iterate of SGD (yellow star) also achieves perfect train accuracy, but with 98.5% test accuracy.
Miraculously, SGD always finds its way through a landscape full of bad minima, and lands at a minimizer with excellent generalization.
for neural networks that perfectly fit the training data and minimize the loss function while making mostly incorrect predictions on test data.
Miraculously, commonly used optimizers reliably avoid such "bad" minima of the loss function, and succeed at finding "good" minima that generalize well.
Our goal here is to develop an intuitive understanding of neural network generalization using visualizations and experiments rather than analysis.
We begin with some experiments to understand why generalization is puzzling, and how over-parameterization impacts model behavior.
Then, we explore how the "flatness" of minima correlates with generalization, and in particular try to understand why this correlation exists.
We explore how the high dimensionality of parameter spaces biases optimizers towards landing in flat minima that generalize well.
Finally, we present some counterfactual experiments to validate the intuition we develop.
Code to reproduce experiments is available at https://github.com/genviz2019/genviz.
We explored the connection between generalization and loss function geometry using visualizations and experiments on classification margin and loss basin volumes, the latter of which does not appear in the literature.
While experiments can provide useful insights, they sometimes raise more questions than they answer.
We explored why the "large margin" properties of flat minima promote generalization.
But what is the precise metric for "margin" that neural networks respect?
Experiments suggest that the small volume of bad minima prevents optimizers from landing in them.
But what is a correct definition of "volume" in a space that is invariant to parameter re-scaling and other transforms, and how do we correctly identify the attraction basins for good minima?
Finally and most importantly: how do we connect these observations back to a rigorous PAC learning framework?
The goal of this study is to foster appreciation for the complex behaviors of neural networks, and to provide some intuitions for why neural networks generalize.
We hope that the experiments contained here will provide inspiration for theoretical progress that leads us to rigorous and definitive answers to the deep questions raised by generalization.

assistant: text: An intuitive empirical and visual exploration of the generalization properties of deep neural networks.