user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Efficient Exploration via State Marginal Matching

Paper content:
Reinforcement learning agents need to explore their unknown environments to solve the tasks given to them.
The Bayes optimal solution to exploration is intractable for complex environments, and while several exploration methods have been proposed as approximations, it remains unclear what underlying objective is being optimized by existing exploration methods, or how they can be altered to incorporate prior knowledge about the task.
Moreover, it is unclear how to acquire a single exploration strategy that will be useful for solving multiple downstream tasks.
We address these shortcomings by learning a single exploration policy that can quickly solve a suite of downstream tasks in a multi-task setting, amortizing the cost of learning to explore.
We recast exploration as a problem of State Marginal Matching (SMM), where we aim to learn a policy for which the state marginal distribution matches a given target state distribution, which can incorporate prior knowledge about the task.
We optimize the objective by reducing it to a two-player, zero-sum game between a state density model and a parametric policy.
Our theoretical analysis of this approach suggests that prior exploration methods do not learn a policy that does distribution matching, but acquire a replay buffer that performs distribution matching, an observation that potentially explains these prior methods' success in single-task settings.
On both simulated and real-world tasks, we demonstrate that our algorithm explores faster and adapts more quickly than prior methods.
Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms must be equipped with exploration mechanisms to effectively solve tasks with limited reward signals.
These tasks arise in many real-world applications where providing human supervision is expensive.
The inability of current RL algorithms to adequately explore limits their applicability to long-horizon control tasks.
A wealth of prior work has studied exploration for RL.
While, in theory, the Bayes-optimal exploration strategy is optimal, it is intractable to compute exactly, motivating work on tractable heuristics for exploration.
Exploration methods based on random actions have limited ability to cover a wide range of states.
More sophisticated techniques, such as intrinsic motivation, accelerate learning in the single-task setting.
However, these methods have two limitations.
First, they do not explicitly define an objective to quantify "good exploration," but rather argue that exploration arises implicitly through some iterative procedure.
Lacking a well-defined optimization objective, it remains challenging to understand what these methods are doing and why they work.
Similarly, the lack of a metric to quantify exploration, even if only for evaluation, makes it challenging to compare exploration methods and assess progress in this area.
The second limitation is that these methods target the single-task setting.
Because these methods aim to converge to the optimal policy for a particular task, it is challenging to repurpose these methods to solve multiple tasks.
We address these shortcomings by considering a multi-task setting, where many different reward functions can be provided for the same set of states and dynamics.
Rather than exploring from scratch for each task, we aim to learn a single, task-agnostic exploration policy that can be adapted to many possible downstream reward functions, amortizing the cost of learning to explore.
This exploration policy can be viewed as a prior on the policy for solving downstream tasks.
Learning will consist of two phases: during training, we acquire this task-agnostic exploration policy; during testing, we use this exploration policy to quickly explore and maximize the task reward.
Learning a single exploration policy is considerably more difficult than doing exploration throughout the course of learning a single task.
The latter is done by intrinsic motivation (Pathak et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2017; Oudeyer et al., 2007) and count-based exploration methods (Bellemare et al., 2016) , which can effectively explore to find states with high reward, at which point the agent can decrease exploration and increase exploitation of those high-reward states.
While these methods perform efficient exploration for learning a single task, the policy at any particular iteration is not a good exploration policy.
For example, the final policy at convergence would only visit the high-reward states discovered for the current task.
What objective should be optimized to obtain a good exploration policy?
We recast exploration as a problem of State Marginal Matching: given a desired state distribution, we learn a mixture of policies for which the state marginal distribution matches this desired distribution.
Without any prior information, this objective reduces to maximizing the marginal state entropy H [s] , which encourages the policy to visit as many states as possible.
The distribution matching objective also provides a convenient mechanism to incorporate prior knowledge about the task, whether in the form of safety constraints that the agent should obey; preferences for some states over other states; reward shaping; or the relative importance of each state dimension for a particular task.
We also propose an algorithm to optimize the State Marginal Matching (SMM) objective.
First, we reduce the problem of SMM to a two-player, zero-sum game between a policy player and a density player.
We find a Nash Equilibrium for this game using fictitious play (Brown, 1951) , a classic procedure from game theory.
Our resulting algorithm iteratively fits a state density model and then updates the policy to visit states with low density under this model.
Our analysis of this approach sheds light on prior work on exploration.
In particular, while the policy learned by existing exploration algorithms does not perform distribution matching, the replay buffer does, an observation that potentially explains the success of prior methods.
On both simulated and real-world tasks, we demonstrate that our algorithm explores more effectively and adapts more quickly to new tasks than state-of-the-art baselines.
In this paper, we introduced a formal objective for exploration.
While it is often unclear what existing exploration algorithms will converge to, our State Marginal Matching objective has a clear solution:
at convergence, the policy should visit states in proportion to their density under a target distribution.
Not only does this objective encourage exploration, it also provides human users with a flexible mechanism to bias exploration towards states they prefer and away from dangerous states.
Upon convergence, the resulting policy can thereafter be used as a prior in a multi-task setting, amortizing exploration and enabling faster adaptation to new, potentially sparse, reward functions.
The algorithm we proposed looks quite similar to previous exploration methods based on prediction error, suggesting that those methods are also performing some form of distribution matching.
However, by deriving our method from first principles, we note that these prior methods omit a crucial historical averaging step, without which the algorithm is not guaranteed to converge.
Experiments on both simulated and real-world tasks demonstrated how SMM learns to explore, enabling an agent to efficiently explore in new tasks provided at test time.
In future work, we aim to study connections between inverse RL, MaxEnt RL and state marginal matching, all of which perform some form of distribution matching.
Empirically, we aim to scale to more complex tasks by parallelizing the training of all mixture components simultaneously.
Broadly, we expect the state distribution matching problem formulation to enable the development of more effective and principled RL methods that reason about distributions rather than individual states.

assistant: text: We view exploration in RL as a problem of matching a marginal distribution over states.