user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Kernel RNN Learning (KeRNL)

Paper content:
We describe Kernel RNN Learning (KeRNL), a reduced-rank, temporal eligibility trace-based approximation to backpropagation through time (BPTT) for training recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that gives competitive performance to BPTT on long time-dependence tasks.
The approximation replaces a rank-4 gradient learning tensor, which describes how past hidden unit activations affect the current state, by a simple reduced-rank product of a sensitivity weight and a temporal eligibility trace.
In this structured approximation motivated by node perturbation, the sensitivity weights and eligibility kernel time scales are themselves learned by applying perturbations.
The rule represents another step toward biologically plausible or neurally inspired ML, with lower complexity in terms of relaxed architectural requirements (no symmetric return weights), a smaller memory demand (no unfolding and storage of states over time), and a shorter feedback time.
Animals and humans excel at learning tasks that involve long-term temporal dependencies.
A key challenge of learning such tasks is the problem of spatiotemporal credit assignment: the learner must find which of many past neural states is causally connected to the currently observed error, then allocate credit across neurons in the brain.
When the time-dependencies between network states and errors are long, learning becomes difficult.In machine learning, the current standard for training recurrent architectures is Backpropagation Through Time (BPTT, Rumelhart et al. (1985) , BID18 ).
BPTT assigns temporal credit or blame by unfolding a recurrent neural network in time up to a horizon length T , processing the input in a forward pass, and then backpropagating the error back in time in a backward pass (see FIG0 ).From
a biological perspective, BPTT -like backpropagation in feedforward neural networks -is implausible for many reasons. For
each weight update, BPTT requires using the transpose of the recurrent weights to transmit errors backwards in time and assign credit for how past activity affected present performance. Running
the network with transposed weights requires that the network either has two-way synapses, or uses a symmetric copy of the feedforward weights to backpropagate error. In either
case, the network must alternatingly gate its dynamical process to run forward or backward, and switch from nonlinear to linear dynamics, depending on whether activity or errors are being sent through the network.From both biological and engineering perspectives, there is a heavy memory demand: the complete network states, going T timesteps back in time, must be stored. The time-complexity
of computation of the gradient in BPTT scales like T , making each iteration slow when training tasks with long time scale dependencies. Although T should match
the length of the task or the maximum temporal lag between network states and errors for unbiased gradient learning, in practice T is often truncated to mitigate these computational costs, introducing a bias.The present work is another step in the direction of providing heuristics and relaxed approximations to backpropagation-based gradient learning for recurrent networks. KeRNL confronts the problems
of efficiency and biological plausibility. It replaces the lengthy, linearized
backward-flowing backpropagation phase with a product of a forward-flowing temporal eligibility trace and a spatial sensitivity weight. Instead of storing all details of past
states in memory, synapses integrate their past activity during the forward pass (see FIG0 ). The network does not have to recompute
the entire gradient at each update, as the time-scales of the eligibility trace and the sensitivity weight are learned over time.

assistant: text: A biologically plausible learning rule for training recurrent neural networks