user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Intriguing Properties of Adversarial Training at Scale

Paper content:
Adversarial training is one of the main defenses against adversarial attacks.
In this paper, we provide the first rigorous study on diagnosing elements of large-scale adversarial training on ImageNet, which reveals two intriguing properties.
First, we study the role of normalization.
Batch normalization (BN) is a crucial element for achieving state-of-the-art performance on many vision tasks, but we show it may prevent networks from obtaining strong robustness in adversarial training.
One unexpected observation is that, for models trained with BN, simply removing clean images from training data largely boosts adversarial robustness, i.e., 18.3%.
We relate this phenomenon to the hypothesis that clean images and adversarial images are drawn from two different domains.
This two-domain hypothesis may explain the issue of BN when training with a mixture of clean and adversarial images, as estimating normalization statistics of this mixture distribution is challenging.
Guided by this two-domain hypothesis, we show disentangling the mixture distribution for normalization, i.e., applying separate BNs to clean and adversarial images for statistics estimation, achieves much stronger robustness.
Additionally, we find that enforcing BNs to behave consistently at training and testing can further enhance robustness.
Second, we study the role of network capacity.
We find our so-called "deep" networks are still shallow for the task of adversarial learning.
Unlike traditional classification tasks where accuracy is only marginally improved by adding more layers to "deep" networks (e.g., ResNet-152), adversarial training exhibits a much stronger demand on deeper networks to achieve higher adversarial robustness.
This robustness improvement can be observed substantially and consistently even by pushing the network capacity to an unprecedented scale, i.e., ResNet-638.
Adversarial attacks (Szegedy et al., 2014) can mislead neural networks to make wrong predictions by adding human imperceptible perturbations to input data.
Adversarial training (Goodfellow et al., 2015) is shown to be an effective method to defend against such attacks, which trains neural networks on adversarial images that are generated on-the-fly during training.
Later works further improve robustness of adversarially trained models by mitigating gradient masking (Tramèr et al., 2018) , imposing logits pairing (Kannan et al., 2018) , denoising at feature space (Xie et al., 2019b) , etc.
However, these works mainly focus on justifying the effectiveness of proposed strategies and apply inconsistent pipelines for adversarial training, which leaves revealing important elements for training robust models still a missing piece in current adversarial research.
In this paper, we provide the first rigorous diagnosis of different adversarial learning strategies, under a unified training and testing framework, on the large-scale ImageNet dataset (Russakovsky et al., 2015) .
We discover two intriguing properties of adversarial training, which are essential for training models with stronger robustness.
First, though Batch Normalization (BN) (Ioffe & Szegedy, 2015) is known as a crucial component for achieving state-of-the-arts on many vision tasks, it may become a major obstacle for securing robustness against strong attacks in the context of adversarial training.
By training such networks adversarially with different strategies, e.g., imposing logits pairing (Kannan et al., 2018) , we observe an unexpected phenomenon -removing clean images from training data is the most effective way for boosting model robustness.
We relate this phenomenon to the conjecture that clean images and adversarial images are drawn from two different domains.
This two-domain hypothesis may explain the limitation of BN when training with a mixture of clean and adversarial images, as estimating normalization statistics on this mixture distribution is challenging.
We further show that adversarial training without removing clean images can also obtain strong robustness, if the mixture distribution is well disentangled at BN by constructing different mini-batches for clean images and adversarial images to estimate normalization statistics, i.e., one set of BNs exclusively for adversarial images and another set of BNs exclusively for clean images.
An alternative solution to avoiding mixture distribution for normalization is to simply replace all BNs with batch-unrelated normalization layers, e.g., group normalization (Wu & He, 2018) , where normalization statistics are estimated on each image independently.
These facts indicate that model robustness is highly related to normalization in adversarial training.
Furthermore, additional performance gain is observed via enforcing consistent behavior of BN during training and testing.
Second, we find that our so-called "deep" networks (e.g., are still shallow for the task of adversarial learning, and simply going deeper can effectively boost model robustness.
Experiments show that directly adding more layers to "deep" networks only marginally improves accuracy for traditional image classification tasks.
In contrast, substantial and consistent robustness improvement is witnessed even by pushing the network capacity to an unprecedented scale, i.e., ResNet-638.
This phenomenon suggests that larger networks are encouraged for the task of adversarial learning, as the learning target, i.e., adversarial images, is a more complex distribution than clean images to fit.
In summary, our paper reveals two intriguing properties of adversarial training: (1) properly handling normalization is essential for obtaining models with strong robustness; and (2) our so-called "deep" networks are still shallow for the task of adversarial learning.
We hope these findings can benefit future research on understanding adversarial training and improving adversarial robustness.
In this paper, we reveal two intriguing properties of adversarial training at scale: (1) conducting normalization in the right manner is essential for training robust models on large-scale datasets like ImageNet; and (2) our so-called "deep" networks are still shallow for the task of adversarial learning.
Our discoveries may also be inherently related to our two-domain hypothesis -clean images and adversarial images are drawn from different distributions.
We hope these findings can facilitate fellow researchers for better understanding of adversarial training as well as further improvement of adversarial robustness.

assistant: text: The first rigor diagnose of large-scale adversarial training on ImageNet