user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Improving Generalization and Stability of Generative Adversarial Networks

Paper content:
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are one of the most popular tools for learning complex high dimensional distributions.
However, generalization properties of GANs have not been well understood.
In this paper, we analyze the generalization of GANs in practical settings.
We show that discriminators trained on discrete datasets with the original GAN loss have poor generalization capability and do not approximate the theoretically optimal discriminator.
We propose a zero-centered gradient penalty for improving the generalization of the discriminator by pushing it toward the optimal discriminator.
The penalty guarantees the generalization and convergence of GANs.
Experiments on synthetic and large scale datasets verify our theoretical analysis.
GANs BID6 are one of the most popular tools for modeling high dimensional data.
The original GAN is, however, highly unstable and often suffers from mode collapse.
Much of recent researches has focused on improving the stability of GANs BID21 BID8 BID14 BID10 .
On the theoretical aspect, BID17 proved that gradient based training of the original GAN is locally stable.
BID8 further proved that GANs trained with Two Timescale Update Rule (TTUR) converge to local equilibria.
However, the generalization of GANs at local equilibria is not discussed in depth in these papers.
BID2 showed that the generator can win by remembering a polynomial number of training examples.
The result implies that a low capacity discriminator cannot detect the lack of diversity.
Therefore, it cannot teach the generator to approximate the target distribution.
In section 4, we discuss the generalization capability of high capacity discriminators.
We show that high capacity discriminators trained with the original GAN loss tends to overfit to the mislabeled samples in training dataset, guiding the generator toward collapsed equilibria (i.e. equilibria where the generator has mode collapse).
BID3 proposed to measure the generalization capability of GAN by estimating the number of modes in the model distribution using the birthday paradox.
Experiments on several datasets showed that the number of modes in the model distribution is several times greater than the number of training examples.
The author concluded that although GANs might not be able to learn distributions, they do exhibit some level of generalization.
Our analysis shows that poor generalization comes from the mismatch between discriminators trained on discrete finite datasets and the theoretically optimal discriminator.
We propose a zero-centered gradient penalty for improving the generalization capability of (high capacity) discriminators.
Our zero-centered gradient penalty pushes the discriminator toward the optimal one, making GAN to converge to equilibrium with good generalization capability.Our contributions are as follow:1.
We show that discriminators trained with the original GAN loss have poor generalization capability.
Poor generalization in the discriminator prevents the generator from learning the target distribution.
TAB0 compares the key properties of our 0-GP with one centered GP (1-GP) BID7 and zero centered GP on real/fake samples only (0-GP-sample) BID13 .
In this paper, we clarify the reason behind the poor generalization capability of GAN.
We show that the original GAN loss does not guide the discriminator and the generator toward a generalizable equilibrium.
We propose a zero-centered gradient penalty which pushes empirical discriminators toward the optimal discriminator with good generalization capability.
Our gradient penalty provides better generalization and convergence guarantee than other gradient penalties.
Experiments on diverse datasets verify that our method significantly improves the generalization and stability of GANs.Pengchuan Zhang, Qiang Liu, Dengyong Zhou, Tao Xu, and Xiaodong He.
On the discriminationgeneralization tradeoff in GANs.
In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.A PROOF FOR PROPOSITION 1For continuous random variable V , P(V = v) = 0 for any v. The probability of finding a noise vector z such that G(z) is exactly equal to a real datapoint x ∈ D r via random sampling is 0.
Therefore, the probability of a real datapoint x i being in the fake dataset D g is 0.
Similarly, the probability of any fake datapoint being in the real dataset is 0.
DISPLAYFORM0 Furthermore, due to the curse of dimensionality, the probability of sampling a datapoint which is close to another datapoint in high dimensional space also decrease exponentially.
The distances between datapoints are larger in higher dimensional space.
That suggests that it is easier to separate D r and D (t) g in higher dimensional space.

assistant: text: We propose a zero-centered gradient penalty for improving generalization and stability of GANs