user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Federated User Representation Learning

Paper content:
Collaborative personalization, such as through learned user representations (embeddings), can improve the prediction accuracy of neural-network-based models significantly.
We propose Federated User Representation Learning (FURL), a simple, scalable, privacy-preserving and resource-efficient way to utilize existing neural personalization techniques in the Federated Learning (FL) setting.
FURL divides model parameters into federated and private parameters.
Private parameters, such as private user embeddings, are trained locally, but unlike federated parameters, they are not transferred to or averaged on the server.
We show theoretically that this parameter split does not affect training for most model personalization approaches.
Storing user embeddings locally not only preserves user privacy, but also improves memory locality of personalization compared to on-server training.
We evaluate FURL on two datasets, demonstrating a significant improvement in model quality with 8% and 51% performance increases, and approximately the same level of performance as centralized training with only 0% and 4% reductions.
Furthermore, we show that user embeddings learned in FL and the centralized setting have a very similar structure, indicating that FURL can learn collaboratively through the shared parameters while preserving user privacy.
Collaborative personalization, like learning user embeddings jointly with the task, is a powerful way to improve accuracy of neural-network-based models by adapting the model to each user's behavior (Grbovic & Cheng, 2018; Ni et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2017; Jaech & Ostendorf, 2018; McGraw et al., 2016; Vosecky et al., 2014 ).
However, model personalization usually assumes the availability of user data on a centralized server.
To protect user privacy, it is desirable to train personalized models in a privacy-preserving way, for example, using Federated Learning (McMahan et al., 2016; Konen et al., 2016b) .
Personalization in FL poses many challenges due to its distributed nature, high communication costs, and privacy constraints (Li et al., 2019a; Bonawitz et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019b; 2018; Yang et al., 2019; Konen et al., 2016a) .
To overcome these difficulties, we propose a simple, communication-efficient, scalable, privacypreserving scheme, called FURL, to extend existing neural-network personalization to FL.
FURL can personalize models in FL by learning task-specific user representations (i.e., embeddings) (Lerer et al., 2019; Grbovic & Cheng, 2018; Ni et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2017; Jaech & Ostendorf, 2018) or by personalizing model weights (Tang & Wang, 2018) .
Research on collaborative personalization in FL (Smith et al., 2017; Sebastian Caldas, 2019; Yao et al., 2019) has generally focused on the development of new techniques tailored to the FL setting.
We show that most existing neural-network personalization techniques, which satisfy the split-personalization constraint (1,2,3), can be used directly in FL, with only a small change to Federated Averaging (McMahan et al., 2016) , the most common FL training algorithm.
Existing techniques do not efficiently train user embeddings in FL since the standard Federated Averaging algorithm (McMahan et al., 2016) transfers and averages all parameters on a central server.
Conventional training assumes that all user embeddings are part of the same model.
Transferring all user embeddings to devices during FL training is prohibitively resource-expensive (in terms of communication and storage on user devices) and does not preserve user privacy.
FURL defines the concepts of federated and private parameters: the latter remain on the user device instead of being transferred to the server.
Specifically, we use a private user embedding vector on each device and train it jointly with the global model.
These embeddings are never transferred back to the server.
We show theoretically and empirically that splitting model parameters as in FURL affects neither model performance nor the inherent structure in learned user embeddings.
While global model aggregation time in FURL increases linearly in the number of users, this is a significant reduction compared with other approaches (Smith et al., 2017; Sebastian Caldas, 2019) whose global aggregation time increases quadratically in the number of users.
FURL has advantages over conventional on-server training since it exploits the fact that models are already distributed across users.
There is little resource overhead in distributing the embedding table across users as well.
Using a distributed embeddings table improves the memory locality of both training embeddings and using them for inference, compared to on-server training with a centralized and potentially very large user embedding table.
Our evaluation of document classification tasks on two real-world datasets shows that FURL has similar performance to the server-only approach while preserving user privacy.
Learning user embeddings improves the performance significantly in both server training and FL.
Moreover, user representations learned in FL have a similar structure to those learned in a central server, indicating that embeddings are learned independently yet collaboratively in FL.
In this paper, we make the following contributions:
• We propose FURL, a simple, scalable, resource-efficient, and privacy preserving method that enables existing collaborative personalization techniques to work in the FL setting with only minimal changes by splitting the model into federated and private parameters.
• We provide formal constraints under which the parameter splitting does not affect model performance.
Most model personalization approaches satisfy these constraints when trained using Federated Averaging (McMahan et al., 2016) , the most popular FL algorithm.
• We show empirically that FURL significantly improves the performance of models in the FL setting.
The improvements are 8% and 51% on two real-world datasets.
We also show that performance in the FL setting closely matches the centralized training with small reductions of only 0% and 4% on the datasets.
• Finally, we analyze user embeddings learned in FL and compare with the user representations learned in centralized training, showing that both user representations have similar structures.
This paper proposes FURL, a simple, scalable, bandwidth-efficient technique for model personalization in FL.
FURL improves performance over non-personalized models and achieves similar performance to centralized personalized model while preserving user privacy.
Moreover, representations learned in both server training and FL show similar structures.
In future, we would like to evaluate FURL on other datasets and models, learn user embeddings jointly across multiple tasks, address the cold start problem and personalize for users not participating in global FL aggregation.

assistant: text: We propose Federated User Representation Learning (FURL), a simple, scalable, privacy-preserving and bandwidth-efficient way to utilize existing neural personalization techniques in the Federated Learning (FL) setting.