user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: The Implicit Bias of Depth: How Incremental Learning Drives Generalization

Paper content:
A leading hypothesis for the surprising generalization of neural networks is that the dynamics of gradient descent bias the model towards simple solutions, by searching through the solution space in an incremental order of complexity.
We formally define the notion of incremental learning dynamics and derive the conditions on depth and initialization for which this phenomenon arises in deep linear models.
Our main theoretical contribution is a dynamical depth separation result, proving that while shallow models can exhibit incremental learning dynamics, they require the initialization to be exponentially small for these dynamics to present themselves.
However, once the model becomes deeper, the dependence becomes polynomial and incremental learning can arise in more natural settings.
We complement our theoretical findings by experimenting with deep matrix sensing, quadratic neural networks and with binary classification using diagonal and convolutional linear networks, showing all of these models exhibit incremental learning.
Neural networks have led to a breakthrough in modern machine learning, allowing us to efficiently learn highly expressive models that still generalize to unseen data.
The theoretical reasons for this success are still unclear, as the generalization capabilities of neural networks defy the classic statistical learning theory bounds.
Since these bounds, which depend solely on the capacity of the learned model, are unable to account for the success of neural networks, we must examine additional properties of the learning process.
One such property is the optimization algorithm -while neural networks can express a multitude of possible ERM solutions for a given training set, gradient-based methods with the right initialization may be implicitly biased towards certain solutions which generalize.
A possible way such an implicit bias may present itself, is if gradient-based methods were to search the hypothesis space for possible solutions of gradually increasing complexity.
This would suggest that while the hypothesis space itself is extremely complex, our search strategy favors the simplest solutions and thus generalizes.
One of the leading results along these lines has been by Saxe et al. (2013) , deriving an analytical solution for the gradient flow dynamics of deep linear networks and showing that for such models, the singular values converge at different rates, with larger values converging first.
At the limit of infinitesimal initialization of the deep linear network, Gidel et al. (2019) show these dynamics exhibit a behavior of "incremental learning" -the singular values of the model are learned separately, one at a time.
Our work generalizes these results to small but finite initialization scales.
Incremental learning dynamics have also been explored in gradient descent applied to matrix completion and sensing with a factorized parameterization (Gunasekar et al. (2017) , Arora et al. (2018) , Woodworth et al. (2019) ).
When initialized with small Gaussian weights and trained with a small learning rate, such a model is able to successfully recover the low-rank matrix which labeled the data, even if the problem is highly over-determined and no additional regularization is applied.
In their proof of low-rank recovery for such models, Li et al. (2017) show that the model remains lowrank throughout the optimization process, leading to the successful generalization.
Additionally, Arora et al. (2019) explore the dynamics of such models, showing the singular values are learned at different rates and that deeper models exhibit stronger incremental learning dynamics.
Our work deals with a more simplified setting, allowing us to determine explicitly under which conditions depth leads to this dynamical phenomenon.
Finally, the learning dynamics of nonlinear models have been studied as well.
Combes et al. (2018) and Williams et al. (2019) study the gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks under restrictive distributional assumptions, Ronen et al. (2019) show that shallow networks learn functions of gradually increasing frequencies and Nakkiran et al. (2019) show how deep ReLU networks correlate with linear classifiers in the early stages of training.
These findings, along with others, suggest that the generalization ability of deep networks is at least in part due to the incremental learning dynamics of gradient descent.
Following this line of work, we begin by explicitly defining the notion of incremental learning for a toy model which exhibits this sort of behavior.
Analyzing the dynamics of the model for gradient flow and gradient descent, we characterize the effect of the model's depth and initialization scale on incremental learning, showing how deeper models allow for incremental learning in larger (realistic) initialization scales.
Specifically, we show that a depth-2 model requires exponentially small initialization for incremental learning to occur, while deeper models only require the initialization to be polynomially small.
Once incremental learning has been defined and characterized for the toy model, we generalize our results theoretically and empirically for larger linear and quadratic models.
Examples of incremental learning in these models can be seen in figure 1, which we discuss further in section 4.
Gradient-based optimization for deep linear models has an implicit bias towards simple (sparse) solutions, caused by an incremental search strategy over the hypothesis space.
Deeper models have a stronger tendency for incremental learning, exhibiting it in more realistic initialization scales.
This dynamical phenomenon exists for the entire optimization process for regression as well as classification tasks, and for many types of models -diagonal networks, convolutional networks, matrix completion and even the nonlinear quadratic network.
We believe this kind of dynamical analysis may be able to shed light on the generalization of deeper nonlinear neural networks as well, with shallow quadratic networks being only a first step towards that goal.
It may seem that the variance loss is an unnatural loss function to analyze, since it isn't used in practice.
While this is true, we will show how the dynamics of this loss function are an approximation of the square loss dynamics.
We begin by describing the dynamics of both losses, showing how incremental learning can't take place for quadratic networks as defined over the squared loss.
Then, we show how adding a global bias to the quadratic network leads to similar dynamics for small initialization scales.

assistant: text: We study the sparsity-inducing bias of deep models, caused by their learning dynamics.