user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Count-Based Exploration with the Successor Representation

Paper content:
The problem of exploration in reinforcement learning is well-understood in the tabular case and many sample-efficient algorithms are known.
Nevertheless, it is often unclear how the algorithms in the tabular setting can be extended to tasks with large state-spaces where generalization is required.
Recent promising developments generally depend on problem-specific density models or handcrafted features.
In this paper we introduce a simple approach for exploration that allows us to develop theoretically justified algorithms in the tabular case but that also give us intuitions for new algorithms applicable to settings where function approximation is required.
Our approach and its underlying theory is based on the substochastic successor representation, a concept we develop here.
While the traditional successor representation is a representation that defines state generalization by the similarity of successor states, the substochastic successor representation is also able to implicitly count the number of times each state (or feature) has been observed.
This extension connects two until now disjoint areas of research.
We show in traditional tabular domains (RiverSwim and SixArms) that our algorithm empirically performs as well as other sample-efficient algorithms.
We then describe a deep reinforcement learning algorithm inspired by these ideas and show that it matches the performance of recent pseudo-count-based methods in hard exploration Atari 2600 games.
Reinforcement learning (RL) tackles sequential decision making problems by formulating them as tasks where an agent must learn how to act optimally through trial and error interactions with the environment.
The goal in these problems is to maximize the sum of the numerical reward signal observed at each time step.
Because the actions taken by the agent influence not just the immediate reward but also the states and associated rewards in the future, sequential decision making problems require agents to deal with the trade-off between immediate and delayed rewards.
Here we focus on the problem of exploration in RL, which aims to reduce the number of samples (i.e., interactions) an agent needs in order to learn to perform well in these tasks when the environment is initially unknown.The sample efficiency of RL algorithms is largely dependent on how agents select exploratory actions.
In order to learn the proper balance between immediate and delayed rewards agents need to navigate through the state space to learn about the outcome of different transitions.
The number of samples an agent requires is related to how quickly it is able to explore the state-space.
Surprisingly, the most common approach is to select exploratory actions uniformly at random, even in high-profile success stories of RL (e.g., BID26 BID17 .
Nevertheless, random exploration often fails in environments with sparse rewards, that is, environments where the agent observes a reward signal of value zero for the majority of states.
RL algorithms tend to have high sample complexity, which often prevents them from being used in the real-world.
Poor exploration strategies is one of the main reasons for this high sample-complexity.
Despite all of its shortcomings, uniform random exploration is, to date, the most commonly used approach for exploration.
This is mainly due to the fact that most approaches for tackling the exploration problem still rely on domain-specific knowledge (e.g., density models, handcrafted features), or on having an agent learn a perfect model of the environment.
In this paper we introduced a general method for exploration in RL that implicitly counts state (or feature) visitation in order to guide the exploration process.
It is compatible to representation learning and the idea can also be adapted to be applied to large domains.This result opens up multiple possibilities for future work.
Based on the results presented in Section 3, for example, we conjecture that the substochastic successor representation can be actually used to generate algorithms with PAC-MDP bounds.
Investigating to what extent different auxiliary tasks impact the algorithm's performance, and whether simpler tasks such as predicting feature activations or parts of the input BID7 are effective is also worth studying.
Finally, it might be interesting to further investigate the connection between representation learning and exploration, since it is also known that better representations can lead to faster exploration BID8 .

assistant: text: We propose the idea of using the norm of the successor representation an exploration bonus in reinforcement learning. In hard exploration Atari games, our the deep RL algorithm matches the performance of recent pseudo-count-based methods.