user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Adversarial Example Detection and Classification with Asymmetrical Adversarial Training

Paper content:
The vulnerabilities of deep neural networks against adversarial examples have become a significant concern for deploying these models in sensitive domains.
Devising a definitive defense against such attacks is proven to be challenging, and the methods relying on detecting adversarial samples are only valid when the attacker is oblivious to the detection mechanism.
In this paper, we consider the adversarial detection problem under the robust optimization framework.
We partition the input space into subspaces and train adversarial robust subspace detectors using asymmetrical adversarial training (AAT).
The integration of the classifier and detectors presents a detection mechanism that provides a performance guarantee to the adversary it considered.
We demonstrate that AAT promotes the learning of class-conditional distributions, which further gives rise to generative detection/classification approaches that are both robust and more interpretable.
We provide comprehensive evaluations of the above methods, and demonstrate their competitive performances and compelling properties on adversarial detection and robust classification problems.
Deep neural networks have become the staple of modern machine learning pipelines, achieving stateof-the-art performance on extremely difficult tasks in various applications such as computer vision (He et al., 2016) , speech recognition (Amodei et al., 2016) , machine translation (Vaswani et al., 2017) , robotics (Levine et al., 2016) , and biomedical image analysis (Shen et al., 2017) .
Despite their outstanding performance, these networks are shown to be vulnerable against various types of adversarial attacks, including evasion attacks (aka, inference or perturbation attacks) (Szegedy et al., 2013; Goodfellow et al., 2014b; Carlini & Wagner, 2017b; Su et al., 2019) and poisoning attacks (Liu et al., 2017; Shafahi et al., 2018) .
These vulnerabilities in deep neural networks hinder their deployment in sensitive domains including, but not limited to, health care, finances, autonomous driving, and defense-related applications and have become a major security concern.
Due to the mentioned vulnerabilities, there has been a recent surge toward designing defense mechanisms against adversarial attacks (Gu & Rigazio, 2014; Jin et al., 2015; Papernot et al., 2016b; Bastani et al., 2016; Madry et al., 2017; Sinha et al., 2018) , which has in turn motivated the design of stronger attacks that defeat the proposed defenses (Goodfellow et al., 2014b; Kurakin et al., 2016b; a; Carlini & Wagner, 2017b; Xiao et al., 2018; Athalye et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2018; He et al., 2018) .
Besides, the proposed defenses have been shown to be limited and often not effective and easy to overcome (Athalye et al., 2018) .
Alternatively, a large body of work has focused on detection of adversarial examples (Bhagoji et al., 2017; Feinman et al., 2017; Gong et al., 2017; Grosse et al., 2017; Metzen et al., 2017; Hendrycks & Gimpel, 2017; Li & Li, 2017; Xu et al., 2017; Pang et al., 2018; Roth et al., 2019; Bahat et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2018; Zheng & Hong, 2018; Tian et al., 2018) .
While training robust classifiers focuses on maintaining performance in presence of adversarial examples, adversarial detection only cares for detecting these examples.
The majority of the current detection mechanisms focus on non-adaptive threats, for which the attacks are not specifically tuned/tailored to bypass the detection mechanism, and the attacker is oblivious to the detection mechanism.
In fact, Carlini & Wagner (2017a) and Athalye et al. (2018) showed that the detection methods presented in (Bhagoji et al., 2017; Feinman et al., 2017; Gong et al., 2017; Grosse et al., 2017; Metzen et al., 2017; Hendrycks & Gimpel, 2017; Li & Li, 2017; Ma et al., 2018) , are significantly less effective than their claimed performances under adaptive attacks.
The current solutions are mostly heuristic approaches that cannot provide performance guarantees to the adversary they considered.
In this paper, we are interested in detection mechanisms for adversarial examples that can withstand adaptive attacks.
Unlike previous approaches that assume adversarial and natural samples coming from different distributions, thus rely on using a single classifier to distinguish between them, we instead partition the input space into subspaces based on the classification system's output and perform adversarial/natural sample classification in these subspaces.
Importantly, the mentioned partitions allow us to drop the adversarial constrain and employ a novel asymmetrical adversarial training (AAT) objective to train robust binary classifiers in the subspaces.
Figure 1 demonstrates our idea of space partitioning and robust detector training.
Our qualitative results show that AAT supports detectors to learn class-conditional distributions, which further motivates generative detection/classification solutions that are both robust and interpretable.
Our specific contributions are:
• We develop adversarial example detection techniques that provide performance guarantees to norm constrained adversaries.
Empirically, our best models improve previous state-ofthe-art mean L 2 distortion from 3.68 to 4.47 on the MNIST dataset, and from 1.1 to 1.5 on the CIFAR10 dataset.
• We study powerful and versatile generative classification models derived from our detection framework and demonstrate their competitive performances over discriminative robust classifiers.
While defense mechanisms based on ordinary adversarial training are vulnerable to unrecognizable inputs (e.g., rubbish examples), inputs that cause confident predictions of our models have human-understandable semantic meanings.
• We demonstrate that AAT not only induces robustness as ordinary adversarial training methods do, but also promotes the learning of class-conditional distributions.
Intuitively, the learning mechanism is similar to that of GANs, but the objective doesn't learn a fixed generator.
On 1D and 2D benchmarking datasets we show this flexibility allows us to precisely control the data generation process such that the detector could be pushed to a good approximation of the underlying density function.
(In case of GANs at the global optimum the discriminator converges to a degenerated uniform solution.)
Our image generation results on CIFAR10 and ImageNet rival that of state-of-the-art GANs.

assistant: text: A new generative modeling technique based on asymmetrical adversarial training, and its applications to adversarial example detection and robust classification