user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Towards Hierarchical Importance Attribution: Explaining Compositional Semantics for Neural Sequence Models

Paper content:
Deep neural networks have achieved impressive performance in handling complicated semantics in natural language, while mostly treated as black boxes.
To explain how the model handles compositional semantics of words and phrases, we study the hierarchical explanation problem.
We highlight the key challenge is to compute non-additive and context-independent importance for individual words and phrases.
We show some prior efforts on hierarchical explanations, e.g. contextual decomposition,  do not satisfy the desired properties mathematically, leading to inconsistent explanation quality in different models.
In this paper, we propose a formal way to quantify the importance of each word or phrase to generate hierarchical explanations.
We modify contextual decomposition algorithms according to our formulation, and propose a model-agnostic explanation algorithm with competitive performance.
Human evaluation and automatic metrics evaluation on both LSTM models and fine-tuned BERT Transformer models on multiple datasets show that our algorithms robustly outperform prior works on hierarchical explanations.
We show our algorithms help explain compositionality of semantics, extract classification rules, and improve human trust of models.
Recent advances in deep neural networks have led to impressive results on a range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks, by learning latent, compositional vector representations of text data (Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019b) .
However, interpretability of the predictions given by these complex, "black box" models has always been a limiting factor for use cases that require explanations of the features involved in modeling (e.g., words and phrases) (Guidotti et al., 2018; Ribeiro et al., 2016) .
Prior efforts on enhancing model interpretability have focused on either constructing models with intrinsically interpretable structures (Bahdanau et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2019a) , or developing post-hoc explanation algorithms which can explain model predictions without elucidating the mechanisms by which model works (Mohseni et al., 2018; Guidotti et al., 2018) .
Among these work, post-hoc explanation has come to the fore as they can operate over a variety of trained models while not affecting predictive performance of models.
Towards post-hoc explanation, a major line of work, additive feature attribution methods (Lundberg & Lee, 2017; Ribeiro et al., 2016; Binder et al., 2016; Shrikumar et al., 2017) , explain a model prediction by assigning importance scores to individual input variables.
However, these methods may not work for explaining compositional semantics in natural language (e.g., phrases or clauses), as the importance of a phrase often is non-linear combination of the importance of the words in the phrase.
Contextual decomposition (CD) (Murdoch et al., 2018) and its hierarchical extension (Singh et al., 2019) go beyond the additive assumption and compute the contribution solely made by a word/phrase to the model prediction (i.e., individual contribution), by decomposing the output variables of the neural network at each layer.
Using the individual contribution scores so derived, these algorithms generate hierarchical explanation on how the model captures compositional semantics (e.g., stress or negation) in making predictions (see Figure 1 for example).
(a) Input occlusion assigns a negative score for the word "interesting", as the sentiment of the phrase becomes less negative after removing "interesting" from the original sentence.
(b) Additive attributions assign importance scores for words "not" and "interesting" by linearly distributing contribution score of "not interesting", exemplified with Shapley Values (Shapley, 1997) .
Intuitively, only
(c) Hierarchical explanations highlight the negative compositional effect between the words "not" and "interesting".
However, despite contextual decomposition methods have achieved good results in practice, what reveals extra importance that emerge from combining two phrases has not been well studied.
As a result, prior lines of work on contextual decomposition have focused on exploring model-specific decompositions based on their performance on visualizations.
We identify the extra importance from combining two phrases can be quantified by studying how the importance of the combined phrase differs from the sum of the importance of the two component phrases on its own.
Similar strategies have been studied in game theory for quantifying the surplus from combining two groups of players (Driessen, 2013) .
Following the definition above, the key challenge is to formulate the importance of a phrase on it own, i.e., context independent importance of a phrase.
However, while contextual decomposition algorithms try to decompose the individual contributions from given phrases for explanation, we show neither of them satisfy this context independence property mathematically.
To this end, we propose a formal way to quantify the importance of each individual word/phrase, and develop effective algorithms for generating hierarchical explanations based on the new formulation.
To mathematically formalize and efficiently approximate context independent importance, we formulate N -context independent importance of a phrase, defined as the difference of model output after masking out the phrase, marginalized over all possible N words surrounding the phrase in the sentence.
We propose two explanation algorithms according to our formulation, namely the Sampling and Contextual Decomposition algorithm (SCD), which overcomes the weakness of contextual decomposition algorithms, and the Sampling and OCclusion algorithm (SOC), which is simple, model-agnostic, and performs competitively against prior lines of algorithms.
We experiment with both LSTM and fine-tuned Transformer models to evaluate the proposed methods.
Quantitative studies involving automatic metrics and human evaluation on sentiment analysis and relation extraction tasks show that our algorithms consistently outperform competitors in the quality of explanations.
Our algorithms manage to provide hierarchical visualization of compositional semantics captured by models, extract classification rules from models, and help users to trust neural networks predictions.
In summary, our work makes the following contributions: (1) we identify the key challenges in generating post-hoc hierarchical explanations and propose a mathematically sound way to quantify context independent importance of words and phrases for generating hierarchical explanations; (2) we extend previous post-hoc explanation algorithm based on the new formulation of N -context independent importance and develop two effective hierarchical explanation algorithms; and (3) both experiments using automatic evaluation metrics and human evaluation demonstrate that the proposed explanation algorithms consistently outperform the compared methods (with both LSTM and Transformer as base models) over several datasets.
In this work, we identify two desirable properties for informative hierarchical explanations of predictions, namely the non-additivity and context-independence.
We propose a formulation to quantify context independent importance of words and phrases that satisfies the properties above.
We revisit the prior line of works on contextual decomposition algorithms, and propose Sampling and Contextual Decomposition (SCD) algorithm.
We also propose a simple and model agnostic explanation algorithm, namely the Sampling and Occlusion algorithm (SOC).
Experiments on multiple datasets and models show that our explanation algorithms generate informative hierarchical explanations, help to extract classification rules from models, and enhance human trust of models.
Table 2 : Phrase-level classification patterns extracted from models.
We show the results of SCD and SOC respectively for the SST-2 and the TACRED dataset.

assistant: text: We propose measurement of phrase importance and algorithms for hierarchical explanation of neural sequence model predictions