user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Cross-View Training for Semi-Supervised Learning

Paper content:
We present Cross-View Training (CVT), a simple but effective method for deep semi-supervised learning.
On labeled examples, the model is trained with standard cross-entropy loss.
On an unlabeled example, the model first performs inference (acting as a "teacher") to produce soft targets.
The model then learns from these soft targets (acting as a ``"student").
We deviate from prior work by adding multiple auxiliary student prediction layers to the model.
The input to each student layer is a sub-network of the full model that has a restricted view of the input  (e.g., only seeing one region of an image).
The students can learn from the teacher (the full model) because the teacher sees more of each example.
Concurrently, the students improve the quality of the representations used by the teacher as they learn to make predictions with limited data.
When combined with Virtual Adversarial Training, CVT improves upon the current state-of-the-art on semi-supervised CIFAR-10 and semi-supervised SVHN.
We also apply CVT to train models on five natural language processing tasks using hundreds of millions of sentences of unlabeled data.
On all tasks CVT substantially outperforms supervised learning alone, resulting in models that improve upon or are competitive with the current state-of-the-art.
Deep learning classifiers work best when trained on large amounts of labeled data.
However, acquiring labels can be costly, motivating the need for effective semi-supervised learning techniques that leverage unlabeled examples during training.
Many semi-supervised learning algorithms rely on some form of self-labeling.
In these approaches, the model acts as both a "teacher" that makes predictions about unlabeled examples and a "student" that is trained on the predictions.
As the teacher and the student have the same parameters, these methods require an additional mechanism for the student to benefit from the teacher's outputs.One approach that has enjoyed recent success is adding noise to the student's input BID0 BID50 .
The loss between the teacher and the student becomes a consistency cost that penalizes the difference between the model's predictions with and without noise added to the example.
This trains the model to give consistent predictions to nearby data points, encouraging smoothness in the model's output distribution with respect to the input.
In order for the student to learn effectively from the teacher, there needs to be a sufficient difference between the two.
However, simply increasing the amount of noise can result in unrealistic data points sent to the student.
Furthermore, adding continuous noise to the input makes less sense when the input consists of discrete tokens, such in natural language processing.We address these issues with a new method we call Cross-View Training (CVT).
Instead of only training the full model as a student, CVT adds auxiliary softmax layers to the model and also trains them as students.
The input to each student layer is a sub-network of the full model that sees a restricted view of the input example (e.g., only seeing part of an image), an idea reminiscent of cotraining BID1 .
The full model is still used as the teacher.
Unlike when using a large amount of input noise, CVT does not unrealistically alter examples during training.
However, the student layers can still learn from the teacher because the teacher has a better, unrestricted view of the input.
Meanwhile, the student layers improve the model's representations (and therefore the teacher) as they learn to make accurate predictions with a limited view of the input.
Our method can be easily combined with adding noise to the students, but works well even when no noise is added.We propose variants of our method for Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) image classifiers, Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) sequence taggers, and graph-based dependency parsers.
For CNNs, each auxiliary softmax layer sees a region of the input image.
For sequence taggers and dependency parsers, the auxiliary layers see the input sequence with some context removed.
For example, one auxiliary layer is trained to make predictions without seeing any tokens to the right of the current one.We first evaluate Cross-View Training on semi-supervised CIFAR-10 and semi-supervised SVHN.
When combined with Virtual Adversarial Training BID39 , CVT improves upon the current state-of-the-art on both datasets.
We also train semi-supervised models on five tasks from natural language processing: English dependency parsing, combinatory categorical grammar supertagging, named entity recognition, text chunking, and part-of-speech tagging.
We use the 1 billion word language modeling benchmark BID3 as a source of unlabeled data.
CVT works substantially better than purely supervised training, resulting in models that improve upon or are competitive with the current state-of-the-art on every task.
We consider these results particularly important because many recently proposed semi-supervised learning methods work best on continuous inputs and have only been evaluated on vision tasks BID0 BID50 BID26 BID59 .
In contrast, CVT can handle discrete inputs such as language very effectively.

assistant: text: Self-training with different views of the input gives excellent results for semi-supervised image recognition, sequence tagging, and dependency parsing.