user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Adversarial Sampling for Active Learning

Paper content:
This paper proposes ASAL, a new pool based active learning method that generates high entropy samples.
Instead of directly annotating the synthetic samples, ASAL searches similar samples from the pool and includes them for training.
Hence, the quality of new samples is high and annotations are reliable.
ASAL is particularly suitable for large data sets because it achieves a better run-time complexity (sub-linear) for sample selection than traditional uncertainty sampling (linear).
We present a comprehensive set of experiments on two data sets and show that ASAL outperforms similar methods and clearly exceeds the established baseline (random sampling).
In the discussion section we analyze in which situations ASAL performs best and why it is sometimes hard to outperform random sample selection.
To the best of our knowledge this is the first adversarial active learning technique that is applied for multiple class problems using deep convolutional classifiers and demonstrates superior performance than random sample selection.
The goal of active learning (AL) algorithms is to train a model most efficiently, i.e. achieving the best performance with as few labelled samples as possible.
Typical AL algorithms operate in an iterative fashion, where in each AL-cycle a query strategy selects samples that the oracle should annotate.
These samples are expected to improve the model most effectively when added to the training set.
This procedure continues until a predefined stopping criteria is met.In this paper we will mainly focus on pool based active learning, because a pool of unlabelled samples is often available beforehand or can easily be build.
Furthermore, annotating all pool samples serves as an ideal evaluation environment for active learning algorithms.
It enables to train a fullysupervised model that establishes a performance upper bound on this data set.
Similarly, randomly selecting instead of actively choosing samples establishes a lower bound.
Then, the goal of an active learning algorithm is to approximate the performance of the fully supervised model with as few labelled samples as possible, while exceeding the performance of random sampling.Uncertainty sampling is an effective query strategy that identifies samples that are more informative than random ones.
The heuristic is, that samples for which the model is most uncertain contain new information and improve the model.
However, to identify such samples an exhaustive search over the full pool is required and the uncertainty score needs to be recomputed as soon as the model is updated (each AL cycle).
Thus, uncertainty sampling has a linear run-time complexity such that scanning very large unlabelled data sets is impractical even for inexpensive score functions.Our contributions are as follows:• We propose Adversarial Sampling for Active Learning (ASAL) that allows to approximate the performance of uncertainty sampling with a sub-linear run-time complexity.•
We conduct an extensive set of experiments using four different benchmarks (two and ten classes) and discuss the limitations of ASAL and how to overcome them.•
We demonstrate ASAL with different CNN based classifiers and three different feature sets to compare samples: raw pixel values, compressed representations of an auto-encoder and the features used to discriminate between real and fake samples in GANs.
Our experiments and results show that ASAL clearly outperforms random sampling and approximates exhaustive uncertainty sampling on three out of four benchmarks.
Compared to GAAL, ASAL outperforms random sampling, enables annotating real samples, handles multiple class problems and uses CNN based classifiers.
ASAL allows to update the feature maps of a classifier in each AL cycle and still achieves sub-linear run-time complexity whereas the hashing based methods of Jain et al. FORMULA1 has a linear run-time complexity if the feature maps are updated.
Updating the classifier and keeping the features for matching fixed, leads to sub-linear run-times but without guaranteeing that newly added samples have the highest entropy of all samples available in the pool.To achieve a sub-linear run-time complexity, ASAL requires to train a GAN and potentially an autoencoder beforehand.
Nonetheless, this initial cost pays off for extremely large data sets.
Although, it might be impractical to consider each sample during training of the GAN, it can generate representative samples and ASAL allows to select samples from the pool that were not used to train the GAN.
Thus, ASAL favours large data sets with similar samples, where it is only possible to train the GAN for a fixed number of iterations but contains a close match for any synthetic sample.
Conversely, small data sets with diverse samples allow to train the GANs for many epochs such that it is align to the data distribution.
However, real samples are sparsely distributed in feature space such that even the closest matches of a synthetic sample are significantly different.We observed in FIG1 that ASAL performs similar as random sampling.
Although ASAL enables to generate uncertain samples, it fails to select similar samples from the pool that have high entropy.
One explanation is the aforementioned situation, where the images are diverse but the data set is comparatively small.
Note, that CIFAR-10 is clearly more diverse than MNIST but has the same amount of samples.
Furthermore, the top row in Fig. 5 shows that synthetic images still look unrealistic and identifying a similar real sample is a challenging problem.
Another reason for poor performance is using low level features to compare different samples.
To achieve state-of-the-art results on CIFAR-10, we had to use a much deeper network than for all other experiments but kept the architectures of the feature extractors almost identical.
This can lead to a mismatch where the entropy of a sample mainly depends on high-level features but the matching method uses only low-level features to compare samples.
FIG2 in the appendix shows for example that exhaustive uncertainty sampling selects most frequently images with the category cat exactly a class that ASAL selects least frequently.
This is a sign that ASAL considers low-level features to find similar samples instead of more complex properties that characterize class information.
Fig.
5 provides again such an indication.
The last column shows a synthetic image with a white horse on a gray background and ASAL proposes matches with white object on a gray background but contain either a ship or an airplane.
This means, that the classifier requires samples of a specific class it is uncertain about, ASAL generates these samples but fails to retrieve matches showing theses categories.On CIFAR-10 -two classes we reported for ASAL-Autoencoder similar or slightly higher accuracy than for exhaustive uncertainty sampling.
Although we consider uncertainty sampling as a performance reference that we try to approximate, it is always possible to exceed its performance.
Note, entropy is one particular property that can identify informative samples.
Nonetheless, it is possible that samples with lower entropy are more effective for training the classifier.
We proposed and evaluated a new pool-based active learning method that uses sample generation and matching.
However, the sub-linear run-time complexity requires relaxing the guarantee, that selected samples have the highest entropy of all pool samples.
We showed, that the success of ASAL depends on different factors: the structure of the data set, the quality of the trained GAN and the relevance of the feature used to compare samples.
A poor GAN can generate high entropy samples but poor quality samples are impractical to match.
Small data sets that contain very different samples complicate both, training GANs and finding similar matches.
Less representative features might not contain the properties needed to find similar samples, where both have a high entropy.
Nonetheless, we demonstrated that ASAL outperforms random sample selection and approximates exhaustive uncertainty sampling in three out of four cases.
Furthermore, the sub-linear run-time complexity makes ASAL suitable for large data set.
We pointed out that ASAL uses low-level feature but there are signs that high-level features might be more suitable to match samples.
Thus, one particular direction of future research includes identifying such high-level features.
Possible candidates are VGG (Simonyan & Zisserman FORMULA1 ) or AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al. FORMULA1 features.
Training the model on the unlabelled pool and the small initial data set might lead to features covering the needed properties.
In addition, sample generation allows adding other scores beside information entropy.
Thus, an interesting direction of future research is designing other scores that will be used during sample generation i.e. measuring sample diversity (Zhu et al. FORMULA2 We keep the suggested splitting into training, validation and testing for each benchmark.

assistant: text: ASAL is a pool based active learning method that generates high entropy samples and retrieves matching samples from the pool in sub-linear time.