user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Towards Reverse-Engineering Black-Box Neural Networks

Paper content:
Many deployed learned models are black boxes: given input, returns output.
Internal information about the model, such as the architecture, optimisation procedure, or training data, is not disclosed explicitly as it might contain proprietary information or make the system more vulnerable.
This work shows that such attributes of neural networks can be exposed from a sequence of queries.
This has multiple implications.
On the one hand, our work exposes the vulnerability of black-box neural networks to different types of attacks -- we show that the revealed internal information helps generate more effective adversarial examples against the black box model.
On the other hand, this technique can be used for better protection of private content from automatic recognition models using adversarial examples.
Our paper suggests that it is actually hard to draw a line between white box and black box models.
Black-box models take a sequence of query inputs, and return corresponding outputs, while keeping internal states such as model architecture hidden.
They are deployed as black boxes usually on purpose -for protecting intellectual properties or privacy-sensitive training data.
Our work aims at inferring information about the internals of black box models -ultimately turning them into white box models.
Such a reverse-engineering of a black box model has many implications.
On the one hand, it has legal implications to intellectual properties (IP) involving neural networks -internal information about the model can be proprietary and a key IP, and the training data may be privacy sensitive.
Disclosing hidden details may also render the model more susceptible to attacks from adversaries.
On the other hand, gaining information about a black-box model can be useful in other scenarios.
E.g. there has been work on utilising adversarial examples for protecting private regions (e.g. faces) in photographs from automatic recognisers BID12 .
In such scenarios, gaining more knowledge on the recognisers will increase the chance of protecting one's privacy.
Either way, it is a crucial research topic to investigate the type and amount of information that can be gained from a black-box access to a model.
We make a first step towards understanding the connection between white box and black box approaches -which were previously thought of as distinct classes.We introduce the term "model attributes" to refer to various types of information about a trained neural network model.
We group them into three types: (1) architecture (e.g. type of non-linear activation), (2) optimisation process (e.g. SGD or ADAM?), and (3) training data (e.g. which dataset?).
We approach the problem as a standard supervised learning task applied over models.
First, collect a diverse set of white-box models ("meta-training set") that are expected to be similar to the target black box at least to a certain extent.
Then, over the collected meta-training set, train another model ("metamodel") that takes a model as input and returns the corresponding model attributes as output.
Importantly, since we want to predict attributes at test time for black-box models, the only information available for attribute prediction is the query input-output pairs.
As we will see in the experiments, such input-output pairs allow to predict model attributes surprisingly well.In summary, we contribute: (1) Investigation of the type and amount of internal information about the black-box model that can be extracted from querying; (2) Novel metamodel methods that not only reason over outputs from static query inputs, but also actively optimise query inputs that can extract more information; (3) Study of factors like size of the meta-training set, quantity and quality of queries, and the dissimilarity between the meta-training models and the test black box (generalisability); (4) Empirical verification that revealed information leads to greater susceptibility of a black-box model to an adversarial example based attack.
We have verified through our novel kennen metamodels that black-box access to a neural network exposes much internal information.
We have shown that only 100 single-label outputs already reveals a great deal about a black box.
When the black-box classifier is quite different from the metatraining classifiers, the performance of our best metamodel -kennen-io-decreases; however, the prediction accuracy for black box internal information is still surprisingly high.
Our metamodel can predict architecture families for ImageNet classifiers with high accuracy.
We additionally show that this reverse-engineering enables more focused attack on black-boxes.
We have presented first results on the inference of diverse neural network attributes from a sequence of input-output queries.
Our novel metamodel methods, kennen, can successfully predict attributes related not only to the architecture but also to training hyperparameters (optimisation algorithm and dataset) even in difficult scenarios (e.g. single-label output, or a distribution gap between the metatraining models and the target black box).
We have additionally shown in ImageNet experiments that reverse-engineering a black box makes it more vulnerable to adversarial examples.

assistant: text: Querying a black-box neural network reveals a lot of information about it; we propose novel "metamodels" for effectively extracting information from a black box.