user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks

Paper content:
We leverage recent insights from second-order optimisation for neural networks to construct a Kronecker factored Laplace approximation to the posterior over the weights of a trained network.
Our approximation requires no modification of the training procedure, enabling practitioners to estimate the uncertainty of their models currently used in production without having to retrain them.
We extensively compare our method to using Dropout and a diagonal Laplace approximation for estimating the uncertainty of a network.
We demonstrate that our Kronecker factored method leads to better uncertainty estimates on out-of-distribution data and is more robust to simple adversarial attacks.
Our approach only requires calculating two square curvature factor matrices for each layer.
Their size is equal to the respective square of the input and output size of the layer, making the method efficient both computationally and in terms of memory usage.
We illustrate its scalability by applying it to a state-of-the-art convolutional network architecture.
Neural networks are most commonly trained in a maximum a posteriori (MAP) setting, which only yields point estimates of the parameters, ignoring any uncertainty about them.
This often leads to overconfident predictions, especially in regimes that are weakly covered by training data or far away from the data manifold.
While the confidence of wrong predictions is usually irrelevant in a research context, it is essential that a Machine Learning algorithm knows when it does not know in the real world, as the consequences of mistakes can be fatal, be it when driving a car or diagnosing a disease.The Bayesian framework of statistics provides a principled way for avoiding overconfidence in the parameters by treating them as unknown quantities and integrating over all possible values.
Specifically, for the prediction of new data under a model, it fits a posterior distribution over the parameters given the training data and weighs the contribution of each setting of the parameters to the prediction by the probability of the data under those parameters times their prior probability.
However, the posterior of neural networks is usually intractable due to their size and nonlinearity.There has been previous interest in integrating neural networks into the Bayesian framework BID26 BID15 BID28 BID1 , however these approaches were designed for small networks by current standards.
Recent adaptations to architectures of modern scale rely on crude approximations of the posterior to become tractable.
All of BID9 BID14 BID2 assume independence between the individual weights.
While they achieve good results on small datasets, this strong restriction of the posterior is susceptible to underestimating the uncertainty, in particular when optimising the variational bound.
The approach in BID6 requires the use of certain stochastic regularisers which are not commonly present in most recent architectures.
Furthermore, it is not clear if the approximate posterior defined by these regularisers is a good fit to the true posterior.Recent work on second-order optimisation of neural networks BID27 BID3 has demonstrated that the diagonal blocks of the curvature can be well approximated by a Kronecker product.
We combine this insight with the idea of modelling the posterior over the weights as a Gaussian, using a Laplace approximation BID26 with Kronecker factored covariance matrices.
This leads to a computationally efficient matrix normal posterior distribution BID11 over the weights of every layer.
Since the Laplace approximation is applied after training, our approach can be used to obtain uncertainty estimates from existing networks.
We presented a scalable approximation to the Laplace approximation for the posterior of a neural network and provided experimental results suggesting that the uncertainty estimates are on par with current alternatives like Dropout, if not better.
It enables practitioners to obtain principled uncertainty estimates from their models, even if they were trained in a maximum likelihood/MAP setting.There are many possible extensions to this work.
One would be to automatically determine the scale and regularisation hyperparameters of the Kronecker factored Laplace approximation using the model evidence similar to how BID26 interpolates between the data log likelihood and the width of the prior.
The model evidence could further be used to perform Bayesian model averaging on ensembles of neural networks, potentially improving their generalisation ability and uncertainty estimates.
A challenging application would be active learning, where only little data is available relative to the number of curvature directions that need to be estimated.

assistant: text: We construct a Kronecker factored Laplace approximation for neural networks that leads to an efficient matrix normal distribution over the weights.