user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Intrinsic Social Motivation via Causal Influence in Multi-Agent RL

Paper content:
We derive a new intrinsic social motivation for multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), in which agents are rewarded for having causal influence over another agent's actions, where causal influence is assessed using counterfactual reasoning.
The reward does not depend on observing another agent's reward function, and is thus a more realistic approach to MARL than taken in previous work.
We show that the causal influence reward is related to maximizing the mutual information between agents' actions.
We test the approach in challenging social dilemma environments, where it consistently leads to enhanced cooperation between agents and higher collective reward.
Moreover, we find that rewarding influence can lead agents to develop emergent communication protocols.
Therefore, we also employ influence to train agents to use an explicit communication channel, and find that it leads to more effective communication and higher collective reward.
Finally, we show that influence can be computed by equipping each agent with an internal model that predicts the actions of other agents.
This allows the social influence reward to be computed without the use of a centralised controller, and as such represents a significantly more general and scalable inductive bias for MARL with independent agents.
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has made impressive progress on specific tasks with well-defined reward functions, but is still difficult to learn intelligent behavior that generalizes across multiple domains.
Intrinsic motivation is a technique for solving this problem by developing general reward functions that encourage an agent to learn across a variety of tasks BID26 .
Previous approaches to intrinsic motivation have broadly fallen into two categories: (1) curiosity, or a drive for novelty (e.g. BID17 BID24 ), and (2) empowerment, or a drive to be able to manipulate the environment (Klyubin et al., 2005) .We
posit that this body of work has largely overlooked an important intrinsic motivation that is key to human learning: social interaction. Humans
have remarkable social learning abilities; some authors suggest that it is social learning that has given rise to cultural evolution, and allowed us to achieve unprecedented progress and coordination on a massive scale BID31 BID11 . Others
emphasize that our impressive capacity to learn from others far surpasses that of other animals, apes, and even other proto-human species BID10 BID9 Laland, 2017) . Therefore
, we propose an intrinsic reward function designed for multi-agent RL (MARL), which awards agents for having a causal influence on other agents' actions. Causal influence
is assessed using counterfactual reasoning; at each timestep, an agent simulates alternate, counterfactual actions that it could have taken, and assesses their effect on another agent's behavior. Actions that lead
to relatively higher change in the other agent are considered to be highly influential and are rewarded. We show how this
reward is related to maximizing the mutual information between agents' actions, and is thus a form of social empowerment. We hypothesize that
rewarding influence may therefore encourage cooperation between agents. We also take inspiration
from experiments in human cognition, showing that newborn infants are sensitive to correspondences between their own actions and the actions of other people, and use this to coordinate their behavior with others BID30 BID13 .To study our proposed social
influence reward in the MARL setting, we adopt the Sequential Social Dilemmas (SSDs) of BID20 . These are challenging MA environments
with a game-theoretic reward structure, similar to Prisoner's Dilemma. For each individual agent, 'defecting
' (non-cooperative behavior) has the highest payoff. However, the collective reward will
be better if all agents choose to cooperate. The paradoxical payoff structure of
these tasks make achieving cooperative social dynamics• Finally, rather than computing social influence using a centralised training framework as in prior work (e.g. BID4 BID3 ), we extend the approach by attaching an internal Model of Other Agents (MOA) network to each agent and training it to predict the actions of every other agent. The agent can then simulate counterfactual
actions and use its own internal MOA to predict how these will affect other agents, thus computing its own intrinsic influence reward.Using a MOA to predict and reward influence allows us to compute an intrinsic social reward by observing other agents' past actions, without a centralised controller, and without requiring access to another agent's reward function. We believe this is an important innovation
over prior work (e.g. (Hughes et al., 2018; BID4 BID3 ). When we consider likely future applications
of MARL, such as autonomous driving, it becomes apparent that centralised training or the sharing of reward functions are unrealistic assumptions, since autonomous vehicles are likely to be produced by a wide variety of organizations and institutions with mixed motivations. Rather, a social reward function which only
depends on observing the behavior of agents acting in the environment, and which can give rise to coordinated, cooperative behavior, represents a more promising approach.
The experiments above have demonstrated that an intrinsic social reward based on having causal influence on the actions of other agents consistently improves cooperation and leads to higher collective return in the MA social dilemmas under investigation.
In some cases, the influence reward drove agents to learn an emergent communication protocol via their actions.
This is compelling, and confirms the connection between maximizing influence and maximizing the mutual information between agents' actions.However, it is important to consider the limitations of the influence reward.
Whether it will always give rise to cooperative behavior may depend on the specifics of the environment, task, and the trade-off between environmental and influence reward.
Although influence is arguably necessary for cooperation (e.g. two agents cooperating to lift a box would have a high degree of influence between their actions), it may not be sufficient, in that it may be possible to influence another agent without helping it.
For example, it is possible that agents could have gained influence in the tasks studied here by threatening to attack other agents with their fining beam.
We believe this type of behavior did not emerge because communicating information represents the cheapest and most effective way to gain influence.
Influencers do not have to sacrifice much in terms of their own environmental reward in order to communicate to other agents.Rewarding influence over an explicit communication channel may not be subject to this limitation, because influential communication may be inherently beneficial to the listener (at least in the case where listeners and speakers interact repeatedly).
Since listeners can easily ignore communication messages if they do not help to obtain environmental reward, a speaker must transmit valuable information in order to gain influence through communication.
There is no advantage to the speaker for communicating unreliably, because it would lose influence with the listener over time (although this is no longer guaranteed in one-shot interactions).
Indeed, our results reveal that agents benefit from being influenced by (listening to) communication messages by obtaining higher individual reward, suggesting that the messages contain valuable information.
Further, we found that the communication protocols learned via influence reward were more meaningful, and that the influence reward allowed agents to obtain higher collective return.
Therefore, we suggest that influence could be a promising way to train emergent communication protocols in various settings.Finally, we have shown that influence can be computed by augmenting agents with an internal model that predicts the actions of other agents, and using this MOA model to simulate the effect of an agent's actions on others.
This represents an important step forward in multi-agent intrinsic social motivation, because it implies that the influence reward can be computed without having access to another agent's reward function, or requiring a centralised controller.

assistant: text: We reward agents for having a causal influence on the actions of other agents, and show that this gives rise to better cooperation and more meaningful emergent communication protocols.