user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Targeted sampling of enlarged neighborhood via Monte Carlo tree search for TSP

Paper content:
The travelling salesman problem (TSP) is a well-known combinatorial optimization problem with a variety of real-life applications.
We tackle TSP by incorporating machine learning methodology and leveraging the variable neighborhood search strategy.
More precisely, the search process is considered as a Markov decision process (MDP), where a 2-opt local search is used to search within a small neighborhood, while a Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) method (which iterates through simulation, selection and back-propagation steps), is used to sample a number of targeted actions within an enlarged neighborhood.
This new paradigm clearly distinguishes itself from the existing machine learning (ML) based paradigms for solving the TSP, which either uses an end-to-end ML model, or simply applies traditional techniques after ML for post optimization.
Experiments based on two public data sets show that, our approach clearly dominates all the existing learning based TSP algorithms in terms of performance, demonstrating its high potential on the TSP.
More importantly, as a general framework without complicated hand-crafted rules, it can be readily extended to many other combinatorial optimization problems.
The travelling salesman problem (TSP) is a well-known combinatorial optimization problem with various real-life applications, such as transportation, logistics, biology, circuit design.
Given n cities as well as the distance d ij between each pair of cities i and j, the TSP aims to find a cheapest tour which starts from a beginning city (arbitrarily chosen), visits each city exactly once, and finally returns to the beginning city.
This problem is NP-hard, thus being extremely difficult from the viewpoint of theoretical computer science.
Due to its importance in both theory and practice, many algorithms have been developed for the TSP, mostly based on traditional operations research (OR) methods.
Among the existing TSP algorithms, the best exact solver Concorde (Applegate et al., 2009 ) succeeded in demonstrating optimality of an Euclidean TSP instance with 85,900 cities, while the leading heuristics (Helsgaun, 2017) and (Taillard & Helsgaun, 2019) are capable of obtaining near-optimal solutions for instances with millions of cities.
However, these algorithms are very complicated, which generally consist of many hand-crafted rules and heavily rely on expert knowledge, thus being difficult to generalize to other combinatorial optimization problems.
To overcome those limitations, recent years have seen a number of ML based algorithms being proposed for the TSP (briefly reviewed in the next section), which attempt to automate the search process by learning mechanisms.
This type of methods do not rely on expert knowledge, can be easily generalized to various combinatorial optimization problems, thus become promising research direction at the intersection of ML and OR.
For the TSP, existing ML based algorithms can be roughly classified into two paradigms, i.e.: (1) End-to-end ML paradigm which uses a ML model alone to directly convert the input instance to a solution.
(2) ML followed by OR paradigm which applies ML at first to provide some additional information, to guide the following OR procedure towards promising regions.
Despite its high potential, for the TSP, existing ML based methods are still in its infancy, struggling to solve instances with more than 100 cities, leaving much room for further improvement compared with traditional methods.
To this end, we propose a novel framework by combining Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) with a basic OR method (2-opt based local search) using variable neighborhood strategy to solve the TSP.
The main contributions are summarized as follows.
• Framework: We propose a new paradigm which combines OR and ML using variable neighborhood strategy.
Starting from an initial state, a basic 2-opt based local search is firstly used to search within a small neighborhood.
When no improvement is possible within the small neighborhood, the search turns into an enlarged neighborhood, where a reinforcement learning (RL) based method is used to identify a sample of promising actions, and iteratively choose one action to apply.
Under this new paradigm, OR and ML respectively work within disjoint space, being flexible and targeted, and clearly different from the two paradigms mentioned above.
More importantly, as a general framework without complicated hand-crafted rules, this framework could not only be applied to the TSP, but also be easily extended to many other combinatorial optimization problems.
• Methodology: When we search within an enlarged neighborhood, it is infeasible to enumerate all the actions.
We then seek to sample a number of promising actions.
To do this automatically, we implement a MCTS method which iterates through simulation, selection and back-propagation steps, to collect useful information that guides the sampling process.
To the best of our knowledge, there is only one existing paper (Shimomura & Takashima, 2016) which also uses MCTS to solve the TSP.
However, their method is a constructive approach, where each state is a partial TSP tour, and each action adds a city to increase the partial tour, until forming a complete tour.
By contrast, our MCTS method is a conversion based approach, where each state is a complete TSP tour, and each action converts the original state to a new state (also a complete TSP tour).
The methodology and implementation details of our MCTS are very different from the MCTS method developed in (Shimomura & Takashima, 2016 ).
• Results: We carry out experiments on two sets of public TSP instances.
Experimental results (detailed in Section 4) show that, on both data sets our MCTS algorithm obtains (within reasonable time) statistically much better results with respect to all the existing learning based algorithms.
These results clearly indicate the potential of our new method for solving the TSP.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly reviews the existing learning based methods on the TSP.
Section 3 describes in detail the new paradigm and the MCTS method.
Section 4 provides and analyzes the experimental results.
Finally Section 5 concludes this paper.
This paper newly develops a novel flexible paradigm for solving TSP, which combines OR and ML in a variable neighborhood search strategy, and achieves highly competitive performance with respect to the existing learning based TSP algorithms.
However, how to combine ML and OR reasonably is still an open question, which deserves continuous investigations.
In the future, we would try more new paradigms to better answer this question, and extend the work to other combinatorial optimization problems.

assistant: text: This paper combines Monte Carlo tree search with 2-opt local search in a variable neighborhood mode to solve the TSP effectively.