user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Preconditioner on Matrix Lie Group for SGD

Paper content:
We study two types of preconditioners and preconditioned stochastic gradient descent (SGD) methods in a unified framework.
We call the first one the Newton type due to its close relationship to the Newton method, and the second one the Fisher type as its preconditioner is closely related to the inverse of Fisher information matrix.
Both preconditioners can be derived from one framework, and efficiently estimated on any matrix Lie groups designated by the user using natural or relative gradient descent minimizing certain preconditioner estimation criteria.
Many existing preconditioners and methods, e.g., RMSProp, Adam, KFAC, equilibrated SGD, batch normalization, etc., are special cases of or closely related to either the Newton type or the Fisher type ones.
Experimental results on relatively large scale machine learning  problems are reported for performance study.
This paper investigates the use of preconditioner for accelerating gradient descent, especially in large scale machine learning problems.
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and its variations, e.g., momentum BID11 BID9 , RMSProp and Adagrad BID5 , Adam BID6 , etc., are popular choices due to their simplicity and wide applicability.
These simple methods do not use well normalized step size, could converge slow, and might involve more controlling parameters requiring fine tweaking.
Convex optimization is a well studied field BID2 .
Many off-the-shelf methods there, e.g., (nonlinear) conjugate gradient descent, quasi-Newton methods, Hessian-free optimizations, etc., can be applied to small and middle scale machine learning problems without much modifications.
However, these convex optimization methods may have difficulty in handling gradient noise and scaling up to problems with hundreds of millions of free parameters.
For a large family of machine learning problems, natural gradient with the Fisher information metric is equivalent to a preconditioned gradient using inverse of the Fisher information matrix as the preconditioner BID1 .
Natural gradient and its variations, e.g., Kronecker-factored approximate curvature (KFAC) BID8 and the one in BID10 , all use such preconditioners.
Other less popular choices are the equilibrated preconditioner BID4 and the one proposed in BID7 .
Momentum or the heavy-ball method provides another independent way to accelerate converge BID9 BID11 .
Furthermore, momentum and preconditioner can be combined to further accelerate convergence as shown in Adam BID6 .
This paper groups the above mentioned preconditioners and preconditioned SGD methods into two classes, the Newton type and the Fisher type.
The Newton type is closely related to the Newton method, and is suitable for general purpose optimizations.
The Fisher type preconditioner relates to the inverse of Fisher information matrix, and is limited to a large subclass of stochastic optimization problems where the Fish information metric can be well defined.
Both preconditioners can be derived from one framework, and estimated on any matrix Lie groups designated by the user with almost the same natural or relative gradient descent methods minimizing specific preconditioner estimation criteria.
Two types of preconditioners and preconditioned SGD methods are studied.
The one requiring Hessian-vector product for preconditioner estimation is suitable for general purpose optimization.
We call it the Newton type preconditioned SGD due to its close relationship to the Newton method.
The other one only requires gradient for preconditioner estimation.
We call it the Fisher type preconditioned SGD as its preconditioner is closely related to the inverse of Fisher information matrix.
Both preconditioners can be efficiently learned using natural or relative gradient descent on any matrix Lie groups designated by the user.
The Fisher type preconditioned SGD has lower computational complexity per iteration, but may require more tuning efforts on selecting its step size and damping factor.
The Newton type preconditioned SGD has higher computational complexity per iteration, but is more user friendly due to its use of normalized step size and built-in gradient noise damping ability.
Both preconditioners, even with very sparse representations, are shown to considerably accelerate convergence on relatively large scale problems.

assistant: text: We propose a new framework for preconditioner learning, derive new forms of preconditioners and learning methods, and reveal the relationship to methods like RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, ESGD, KFAC, batch normalization, etc.