user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: SNIP: SINGLE-SHOT NETWORK PRUNING BASED ON CONNECTION SENSITIVITY

Paper content:
Pruning large neural networks while maintaining their performance is often desirable due to the reduced space and time complexity.
In existing methods, pruning is done within an iterative optimization procedure with either heuristically designed pruning schedules or additional hyperparameters, undermining their utility.
In this work, we present a new approach that prunes a given network once at initialization prior to training.
To achieve this, we introduce a saliency criterion based on connection sensitivity that identifies structurally important connections in the network for the given task.
This eliminates the need for both pretraining and the complex pruning schedule while making it robust to architecture variations.
After pruning, the sparse network is trained in the standard way.
Our method obtains extremely sparse networks with virtually the same accuracy as the reference network on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny-ImageNet classification tasks and is broadly applicable to various architectures including convolutional, residual and recurrent networks.
Unlike existing methods, our approach enables us to demonstrate that the retained connections are indeed relevant to the given task.
Despite the success of deep neural networks in machine learning, they are often found to be highly overparametrized making them computationally expensive with excessive memory requirements.
Pruning such large networks with minimal loss in performance is appealing for real-time applications, especially on resource-limited devices.
In addition, compressed neural networks utilize the model capacity efficiently, and this interpretation can be used to derive better generalization bounds for neural networks BID0 ).In
network pruning, given a large reference neural network, the goal is to learn a much smaller subnetwork that mimics the performance of the reference network. The
majority of existing methods in the literature attempt to find a subset of weights from the pretrained reference network either based on a saliency criterion BID29 ; BID22 ; BID11 ) or utilizing sparsity enforcing penalties BID3 ; BID2 ). Unfortunately
, since pruning is included as a part of an iterative optimization procedure, all these methods require many expensive prune -retrain cycles and heuristic design choices with additional hyperparameters, making them non-trivial to extend to new architectures and tasks.In this work, we introduce a saliency criterion that identifies connections in the network that are important to the given task in a data-dependent way before training. Specifically
, we discover important connections based on their influence on the loss function at a variance scaling initialization, which we call connection sensitivity. Given the desired
sparsity level, redundant connections are pruned once prior to training (i.e., single-shot), and then the sparse pruned network is trained in the standard way. Our approach has
several attractive properties:• Simplicity. Since the network
is pruned once prior to training, there is no need for pretraining and complex pruning schedules. Our method has no
additional hyperparameters and once pruned, training of the sparse network is performed in the standard way.• Versatility. Since
our saliency criterion
chooses structurally important connections, it is robust to architecture variations. Therefore our method can be
applied to various architectures including convolutional, residual and recurrent networks with no modifications.• Interpretability. Our method
determines important
connections with a mini-batch of data at single-shot. By varying this mini-batch used
for pruning, our method enables us to verify that the retained connections are indeed essential for the given task.We evaluate our method on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny-ImageNet classification datasets with widely varying architectures. Despite being the simplest, our
method obtains extremely sparse networks with virtually the same accuracy as the existing baselines across all tested architectures. Furthermore, we investigate the
relevance of the retained connections as well as the effect of the network initialization and the dataset on the saliency score.
In this work, we have presented a new approach, SNIP, that is simple, versatile and interpretable; it prunes irrelevant connections for a given task at single-shot prior to training and is applicable to a variety of neural network models without modifications.
While SNIP results in extremely sparse models, we find that our connection sensitivity measure itself is noteworthy in that it diagnoses important connections in the network from a purely untrained network.
We believe that this opens up new possibilities beyond pruning in the topics of understanding of neural network architectures, multi-task transfer learning and structural regularization, to name a few.
In addition to these potential directions, we intend to explore the generalization capabilities of sparse networks.
Notably, compared to the case of using SNIP FIG1 , the results are different: Firstly, the results on the original (Fashion-)MNIST (i.e.,
(a) and
(c) above) are not the same as the ones using SNIP (i.e.,
(a) and
(b) in FIG1 .
Moreover, the pruning patterns are inconsistent with different sparsity levels, either intra-class or inter-class.
Furthermore, using ∂L/∂w results in different pruning patterns between the original and inverted data in some cases (e.g., the 2 nd columns between
(c) and ( Figure 7: The effect of varying sparsity levels (κ).
The lowerκ becomes, the lower training loss is recorded, meaning that a network with more parameters is more vulnerable to fitting random labels.
Recall, however, that all pruned models are able to learn to perform the classification task without losing much accuracy (see Figure 1 ).
This potentially indicates that the pruned network does not have sufficient capacity to fit the random labels, but it is capable of performing the classification.C TINY-IMAGENET Table 4 : Pruning results of SNIP on Tiny-ImageNet (before → after).
Tiny-ImageNet 2 is a subset of the full ImageNet: there are 200 classes in total, each class has 500 and 50 images for training and validation respectively, and each image has the spatial resolution of 64×64.
Compared to CIFAR-10, the resolution is doubled, and to deal with this, the stride of the first convolution in all architectures is doubled, following the standard practice for this dataset.
In general, the Tiny-ImageNet classification task is considered much more complex than MNIST or CIFAR-10.
Even on Tiny-ImageNet, however, SNIP is still able to prune a large amount of parameters with minimal loss in performance.
AlexNet models lose more accuracies than VGGs, which may be attributed to the fact that the first convolution stride for AlexNet is set to be 4 (by its design of no pooling) which is too large and could lead to high loss of information when pruned.

assistant: text: We present a new approach, SNIP, that is simple, versatile and interpretable; it prunes irrelevant connections for a given task at single-shot prior to training and is applicable to a variety of neural network models without modifications.