user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Adversarial Vulnerability of Neural Networks Increases with Input Dimension

Paper content:
Over the past four years, neural networks have been proven vulnerable to adversarial images: targeted but imperceptible image perturbations lead to drastically different predictions.
We show that adversarial vulnerability increases with the gradients of the training objective when viewed as a function of the inputs.
For most current network architectures, we prove that the L1-norm of these gradients grows as the square root of the input size.
These nets therefore become increasingly vulnerable with growing image size.
Our proofs rely on the network’s weight distribution at initialization, but extensive experiments confirm that our conclusions still hold after usual training.
Following the work of BID7 , Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been found vulnerable to adversarial examples: an adversary can drive the performance of state-of-the art CNNs down to chance level with imperceptible changes of the inputs.
A number of studies have tried to address this issue, but only few have stressed that, because adversarial examples are essentially small input changes that create large output variations, they are inherently caused by large gradients of the neural network with respect to its inputs.
Of course, this view, which we will focus on here, assumes that the network and loss are differentiable.
It has the advantage to yield a large body of specific mathematical tools, but might not be easily extendable to masked gradients, non-smooth models or the 0-1-loss.
Nevertheless, our conclusions might even hold for non-smooth models, given that the latter can often be viewed as smooth at a coarser level.Contributions.
More specifically, we provide theoretical and empirical arguments supporting the existence of a monotonic relationship between the gradient norm of the training objective (of a differentiable classifier) and its adversarial vulnerability.
Evaluating this norm based on the weight statistics at initialization, we show that CNNs and most feed-forward networks, by design, exhibit increasingly large gradients with input dimension d, almost independently of their architecture.
That leaves them increasingly vulnerable to adversarial noise.
We corroborate our theoretical results by extensive experiments.
Although some of those experiments involve adversarial regularization schemes, our goal is not to advocate a new adversarial defense (these schemes are already known), but to show how their effect can be explained by our first order analysis.
We do not claim to explain all aspects of adversarial vulnerability, but we claim that our first order argument suffices to explain a significant part of the empirical findings on adversarial vulnerability.
This calls for researching the design of neural network architectures with inherently smaller gradients and provides useful guidelines to practitioners and network designers.
For differentiable classifiers and losses, we showed that adversarial vulnerability increases with the gradients ∂ x L of the loss, which is confirmed by the near-perfect functional relationship between gradient norms and vulnerability FIG1 We then evaluated the size of ∂ x L q and showed that, at initialization, usual feed-forward nets (convolutional or fully connected) are increasingly vulnerable to p -attacks with growing input dimension d (the image-size), almost independently of their architecture.
Our experiments show that, on the tested architectures, usual training escapes those prior gradient (and vulnerability) properties on the training, but not on the test set.
BID14 suggest that alleviating this generalization gap requires more data.
But a natural (complementary) alternative would be to search for architectures with naturally smaller gradients, and in particular, with well-behaved priors.
Despite all their limitations (being only first-order, assuming a prior weight-distribution and a differentiable loss and architecture), our theoretical insights may thereby still prove to be precious future allies.

assistant: text: Neural nets have large gradients by design; that makes them adversarially vulnerable.