user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: HOW IMPORTANT ARE NETWORK WEIGHTS? TO WHAT EXTENT DO THEY NEED AN UPDATE?

Paper content:
In the context of optimization, a gradient of a neural network indicates the amount a specific weight should change with respect to the loss.
Therefore, small gradients indicate a good value of the weight that requires no change and can be kept frozen during training.
This paper provides an experimental study on the importance of a neural network weights, and to which extent do they need to be updated.
We wish to show that starting from the third epoch, freezing weights which have no informative gradient and are less likely to be changed during training, results in a very slight drop in the overall accuracy (and in sometimes better).
We experiment on the MNIST, CIFAR10 and Flickr8k datasets using several architectures (VGG19,
ResNet-110 and DenseNet-121).
On CIFAR10, we show that freezing 80% of the VGG19 network parameters from the third epoch onwards results in 0.24% drop in accuracy, while freezing 50% of Resnet-110 parameters results in 0.9% drop in accuracy and finally freezing 70% of Densnet-121 parameters results in 0.57% drop in accuracy.
Furthermore, to experiemnt with real-life applications, we train an image captioning model with attention mechanism on the Flickr8k dataset using LSTM networks, freezing 60% of the parameters from the third epoch onwards, resulting in a better BLEU-4 score than the fully trained model.
Our source code can be found in the appendix.
The immense success of deep neural networks we are witnessing since the deep learning revolution occurred is surprising.
A large variety of vision and language applications ranging from image classification, object detection, image synthesis, image super-resolution, image captioning, language modeling....
etc.
has proved that neural networks possess a powerful capability of learning very complex data.
However, training these networks to perform as expected is very time-consuming and requires powerful graphical processing units (GPUs) .
A recently published open-source project by NVIDIA 1 claimed that training a generative adversarial network (GAN) took more than 6 days on 8 Tesla V100 GPUs.
However, we argue that a lot of parameters involved during training are important for update only for the first few epochs (in our experiments, the first two epochs only), and can be frozen for the rest of the training epochs.
The backpropagation algorithm is the base algorithm used to optimize deep neural networks.
For each weight, a gradient is computed with respect to the loss which indicates the amount a weight should change.
Large gradients correspond to a large change that will occur in the weight, while small ones (near to zero) indicate that the weight is nearly optimized and does not need much change.
In particular, if a gradient for a particular weight is zero or close to zero, this means that it has either reached its optimal solution, or it is stuck at a saddle point.
The former means that the weight has a good value and is less likely to change throughout the training and can be kept frozen.
In this paper, we wish to show the redundancy of weights in a neural network that have no influence and can be kept frozen during training.
In particular, we demonstrate that fully training a model with all its weights is required for the first two epochs only.
To justify this, we propose an experimental technique named Partial Backpropagation, which freezes weights that have gradients very near to zero and are less likely to change, with the rest of the weights trained normally.
This induces a very slight drop in accuracy (and no harm in accuracy for lesser freezing).
An overview of our experimental technque is shown in Figure 1 .
Note that in Figure 1(b) , the red weights are frozen and not removed or zeroed out.
We can further visualize the histogram of gradients across the network layers to have a better understanding of their distributions.
In Figure 2 , we visualize the distribution of gradients from several layers in a VGG19 convolutional network (Simonyan & Zisserman, 2015) .
In particular, we visualize the gradients of layers 3, 7, 10 and 13 after training for 2 epochs.
We can see a large number of gradients with values very near to zero, suggesting that a lot of weights in these layers have already been optimized and are less likely to change throughout the training.
We provided an experimental study on the importance of a neural network weights, and to which extent do they need to be updated.
Through our experiments, we emphasized the number of redundant parameters that carry no informative gradient, which if frozen from the third epoch onwards, slightly effect (and in sometimes do not) the overall accuracy of the model.
To prove our concern, we ran experiments on the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets using several CNN architectures (VGG19, ResNet-110 and DenseNet-121), as well as the Flick8k dataset using an image captioning architecture composed of LSTM networks with attention mechanism.
Our experiments successfully prove the concern of this paper.

assistant: text: An experimental paper that proves the amount of redundant weights that can be freezed from the third epoch only, with only a very slight drop in accuracy.