user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Reanalysis of Variance Reduced Temporal Difference Learning

Paper content:
Temporal difference (TD) learning is a popular algorithm for policy evaluation in reinforcement learning, but the vanilla TD can substantially suffer from the inherent optimization variance.
A variance reduced TD (VRTD) algorithm was proposed by Korda and La (2015), which applies the variance reduction technique directly to the online TD learning with Markovian samples.
In this work, we first point out the technical errors in the analysis of VRTD in Korda and La (2015), and then provide a mathematically solid analysis of the non-asymptotic convergence of VRTD and its variance reduction performance.
We show that VRTD is guaranteed to converge to a neighborhood of the fixed-point solution of TD at a linear convergence rate.
Furthermore, the variance error (for both i.i.d. and Markovian sampling) and the bias error (for Markovian sampling) of VRTD are significantly reduced by the batch size of variance reduction in comparison to those of vanilla TD.
In reinforcement learning (RL), policy evaluation aims to obtain the expected long-term reward of a given policy and plays an important role in identifying the optimal policy that achieves the maximal cumulative reward over time Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis (1995) ; Dayan and Watkins (1992) ; Rummery and Niranjan (1994) .
The temporal difference (TD) learning algorithm, originally proposed by Sutton (1988) , is one of the most widely used policy evaluation methods, which uses the Bellman equation to iteratively bootstrap the estimation process and continually update the value function in an incremental way.
In practice, if the state space is large or infinite, function approximation is often used to find an approximate value function efficiently.
Theoretically, TD with linear function approximation has been shown to converge to the fixed point solution with i.i.d. samples and Markovian samples in Sutton (1988) ; Tsitsiklis and Van Roy (1997) .
The finite sample analysis of TD has also been studied in Bhandari et al. (2018) ; Srikant and Ying (2019) ; Dalal et al. (2018a); Cai et al. (2019) .
Since each iteration of TD uses one or a mini-batch of samples to estimate the mean of the gradient 1 , TD learning usually suffers from the inherent variance, which substantially degrades the convergence accuracy.
Although a diminishing stepsize or very small constant stepsize can reduce the variance Bhandari et al. (2018) ; Srikant and Ying (2019) ; Dalal et al. (2018a) , they also slow down the convergence significantly.
Two approaches have been proposed to reduce the variance.
The first approach is the so-called batch TD, which takes a fixed sample set and transforms the empirical mean square projected Bellman error (MSPBE) into an equivalent convex-concave saddle-point problem Du et al. (2017) .
Due to the finite-sample nature of such a problem, stochastic variance reduction techniques for conventional optimization can be directly applied here to reduce the variance.
In particular, Du et al. (2017) showed that SVRG Johnson and Zhang (2013) and SAGA Defazio et al. (2014) can be applied to improve the performance of batch TD algorithms, and Peng et al. (2019) proposed two variants of SVRG to further save the computation cost.
However, the analysis of batch TD does not take into account the statistical nature of the training samples, which are generated by a MDP.
Hence, there is no guarantee of such obtained solutions to be close to the fixed point of TD learning.
The second approach is the so-called TD with centering (CTD) algorithm proposed in Korda and La (2015) , which introduces the variance reduction idea to the original TD learning algorithm.
For the sake of better reflecting its major feature, we refer to CTD as Variance Reduced TD (VRTD) throughout this paper.
Similarly to the SVRG in Johnson and Zhang (2013) , VRTD has outer and inner loops.
The beginning of each inner-loop (i.e. each epoch) computes a batch of sample gradients so that each subsequent inner loop iteration modifies only one sample gradient in the batch gradient to reduce the variance.
The main difference between VRTD and batch TD is that VRTD applies the variance reduction directly to TD learning rather than to a transformed optimization problem in batch TD.
Though Korda and La (2015) empirically verified that VRTD has better convergence accuracy than vanilla TD learning, some technical errors in the analysis in Korda and La (2015) have been pointed out in follow up studies Dalal et al. (2018a) ; Narayanan and Szepesvári (2017) .
Furthermore, as we discuss in Section 3, the technical proof in Korda and La (2015) regarding the convergence of VRTD also has technical errors so that their results do not correctly characterize the impact of variance reduction on TD learning.
Given the recent surge of interest in the finite time analysis of the vanilla TD Bhandari et al. (2018) ; Srikant and Ying (2019) ; Dalal et al. (2018a) , it becomes imperative to reanalyze the VRTD and accurately understand whether and how variance reduction can help to improve the convergence accuracy over vanilla TD.
Towards this end, this paper specifically addresses the following central questions.
• For i.i.d. sampling, it has been shown in Bhandari et al. (2018) that vanilla TD converges only to a neighborhood of the fixed point for a constant stepsize and suffers from a constant error term caused by the variance of the stochastic gradient at each iteration.
For VRTD, does the variance reduction help to reduce such an error and improve the accuracy of convergence?
How does the error depend on the variance reduction parameter, i.e., the batch size for variance reduction?
• For Markovian sampling, it has been shown in Bhandari et al. (2018) ; Srikant and Ying (2019) that the convergence of vanilla TD further suffers from a bias error due to the correlation among samples in addition to the variance error as in i.i.d. sampling.
Does VRTD, which was designed to have reduced variance, also enjoy reduced bias error?
If so, how does the bias error depend on the batch size for variance reduction?

assistant: text: This paper provides a rigorous study of the variance reduced TD learning and characterizes its advantage over vanilla TD learning