user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Leave no Trace: Learning to Reset for Safe and Autonomous Reinforcement Learning

Paper content:
Deep reinforcement learning algorithms can learn complex behavioral skills, but real-world application of these methods requires a considerable amount of experience to be collected by the agent.
In practical settings, such as robotics, this involves repeatedly attempting a task, resetting the environment between each attempt.
However, not all tasks are easily or automatically reversible.
In practice, this learning process requires considerable human intervention.
In this work, we propose an autonomous method for safe and efficient reinforcement learning that simultaneously learns a forward and backward policy, with the backward policy resetting the environment for a subsequent attempt.
By learning a value function for the backward policy, we can automatically determine when the forward policy is about to enter a non-reversible state, providing for uncertainty-aware safety aborts.
Our experiments illustrate that proper use of the backward policy can greatly reduce the number of manual resets required to learn a task and can reduce the number of unsafe actions that lead to non-reversible states.
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have the potential to automate acquisition of complex behaviors in a variety of real-world settings.
Recent results have shown success on games BID16 ), locomotion BID22 ), and a variety of robotic manipulation skills ; ; BID8 ).
However, the complexity of tasks achieved with deep RL in simulation still exceeds the complexity of the tasks learned in the real world.
Why have real-world results lagged behind the simulated accomplishments of deep RL algorithms?One
challenge with real-world application of deep RL is the scaffolding required for learning: a bad policy can easily put the system into an unrecoverable state from which no further learning is possible. For
example, an autonomous car might collide at high speed, and a robot learning to clean glasses might break them. Even
in cases where failures are not catastrophic, some degree of human intervention is often required to reset the environment between attempts (e.g., BID2 ).Most
RL algorithms require sampling from the initial state distribution at the start of each episode. On real-world
tasks, this operation often corresponds to a manual reset of the environment after every episode, an expensive solution for complex environments. Even when tasks
are designed so that these resets are easy (e.g., and BID8 ), manual resets are necessary when the robot or environment breaks (e.g., BID7 ). The bottleneck
for learning many real-world tasks is not that the agent collects data too slowly, but rather that data collection stops entirely when the agent is waiting for a manual reset. To avoid manual
resets caused by the environment breaking, task designers often add negative rewards to dangerous states and intervene to prevent agents from taking dangerous actions. While this works
well for simple tasks, scaling to more complex environments requires writing large numbers of rules for types of actions the robot should avoid. For example, a robot
should avoid hitting itself, except when clapping. One interpretation of
our method is as automatically learning these safety rules. Decreasing the number
of manual resets required to learn to a task is important for scaling up RL experiments outside simulation, allowing researchers to run longer experiments on more agents for more hours.We propose to address these challenges by forcing our agent to "leave no trace." The goal is to learn
not only how to do the task at hand, but also how to undo it. The intuition is that
the sequences of actions that are reversible are safe; it is always possible to undo them to get back to the original state. This property is also
desirable for continual learning of agents, as it removes the requirements for manual resets. In this work, we learn
two policies that alternate between attempting the task and resetting the environment. By learning how to reset
the environment at the end of each episode, the agent we learn requires significantly fewer manual resets. Critically, our value-based
reset policy restricts the agent to only visit states from which it can return, intervening to prevent the forward policy from taking potentially irreversible actions. Using the reset policy to regularize
the forward policy encodes the assumption that whether our learned reset policy can reset is a good proxy for whether any reset policy can reset. The algorithm we propose can be applied
to both deterministic and stochastic MDPs. For stochastic MDPs we say that an action
is reversible if the probability that an oracle reset policy can successfully reset from the next state is greater than some safety threshold. The set of states from which the agent knows
how to return grows over time, allowing the agent to explore more parts of the environment as soon as it is safe to do so.The main contribution of our work is a framework for continually and jointly learning a reset policy in concert with a forward task policy. We show that this reset policy not only automates
resetting the environment between episodes, but also helps ensure safety by reducing how frequently the forward policy enters unrecoverable states. Incorporating uncertainty into the value functions
of both the forward and reset policy further allows us to make this process risk-aware, balancing exploration against safety. Our experiments illustrate that this approach reduces
the number of "hard" manual resets required during learning of a variety of simulated robotic skills.
In this paper, we presented a framework for automating reinforcement learning based on two principles: automated resets between trials, and early aborts to avoid unrecoverable states.
Our method simultaneously learns a forward and reset policy, with the value functions of the two policies used to balance exploration against recoverability.
Experiments in this paper demonstrate that our algorithm not only reduces the number of manual resets required to learn a task, but also learns to avoid unsafe states and automatically induces a curriculum.Our algorithm can be applied to a wide range of tasks, only requiring a few manual resets to learn some tasks.
During the early stages of learning we cannot accurately predict the consequences of our actions.
We cannot learn to avoid a dangerous state until we have visited that state (or a similar state) and experienced a manual reset.
Nonetheless, reducing the number of manual resets during learning will enable researchers to run experiments for longer on more agents.
A second limitation of our work is that we treat all manual resets as equally bad.
In practice, some manual resets are more costly than others.
For example, it is more costly for a grasping robot to break a wine glass than to push a block out of its workspace.
An approach not studied in this paper for handling these cases would be to specify costs associated with each type of manual reset, and incorporate these reset costs into the learning algorithm.While the experiments for this paper were done in simulation, where manual resets are inexpensive, the next step is to apply our algorithm to real robots, where manual resets are costly.
A challenge introduced when switching to the real world is automatically identifying when the agent has reset.
In simulation we can access the state of the environment directly to compute the distance between the current state and initial state.
In the real world, we must infer states from noisy sensor observations to deduce if they are the same.

assistant: text: We propose an autonomous method for safe and efficient reinforcement learning that simultaneously learns a forward and backward policy, with the backward policy resetting the environment for a subsequent attempt.