user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens

Paper content:
Federated learning distributes model training among a multitude of agents, who, guided by privacy concerns, perform training using their local data but share only model parameter updates, for iterative aggregation at the server.
In this work, we explore the threat of model poisoning attacks on federated learning initiated by a single, non-colluding malicious agent where the adversarial objective is to cause the model to misclassify a set of chosen inputs with high confidence.
We explore a number of strategies to carry out this attack, starting with simple boosting of the malicious agent's update to overcome the effects of other agents' updates.
To increase attack stealth, we propose an alternating minimization strategy, which alternately optimizes for the training loss and the adversarial objective.
We follow up by using parameter estimation for the benign agents' updates to improve on attack success.
Finally, we use a suite of interpretability techniques to generate visual explanations of model decisions for both benign and malicious models and show that the explanations are nearly visually indistinguishable.
Our results indicate that even a highly constrained adversary can carry out model poisoning attacks while simultaneously maintaining stealth, thus highlighting the vulnerability of the federated learning setting and the need to develop effective defense strategies.
Federated learning introduced by BID11 has recently emerged as a popular implementation of distributed stochastic optimization for large-scale deep neural network training.
It is formulated as a multi-round strategy in which the training of a neural network model is distributed between multiple agents.
In each round, a random subset of agents, with local data and computational resources, is selected for training.
The selected agents perform model training and share only the parameter updates with a centralized parameter server, that facilitates aggregation of the updates.
Motivated by privacy concerns, the server is designed to have no visibility into an agents' local data and training process.
The aggregation algorithm is agnostic to the data distribution at the agents.In this work, we exploit this lack of transparency in the agent updates, and explore the possibility of a single malicious agent performing a model poisoning attack.
The malicious agent's objective is to cause the jointly trained global model to misclassify a set of chosen inputs with high confidence, i.e., it seeks to introduce a targeted backdoor in the global model.
In each round, the malicious agent generates its update by optimizing for a malicious objective different than the training loss for federated learning.
It aims to achieve this by generating its update by directly optimizing for the malicious objective.
However, the presence of a multitude of other agents which are simultaneously providing updates makes this challenging.
Further, the malicious agent must ensure that its update is undetectable as aberrant.Contributions: To this end, we propose a sequence of model poisoning attacks, with the aim of achieving the malicious objective while maintaining attack stealth.
For each strategy, we consider both attack strength as well as stealth.
We start with malicious update boosting, designed to negate the combined effect of the benign agents, which enables the adversary to achieve its malicious objective with 100% confidence.
However, we show that boosted updates can be detected as aberrant using two measures of stealth, accuracy checking on the benign objective and parameter update statistics.
Observing that the only parameter updates that need to be boosted are those that con-tribute to the malicious objective, we design an alternating minimization strategy that improves attack stealth.
This strategy alternates between training loss minimization and the boosting of updates for the malicious objective and is able to achieve high success rate on both the benign and malicious objectives.
In addition, we show that estimating the other agents' updates improves attack success rates.
Finally, we use a suite of interpretability techniques to generate visual explanations of the decisions made by a global model with and without a targeted backdoor.
Interestingly, we observe that the explanations are nearly visually indistinguishable.
This establishes the attack stealth along yet another axis of measurement and indicates that backdoors can be inserted without drastic changes in model focus at the input.
In this paper, we have started an exploration of the vulnerability of multi-party machine learning algorithms such as federated learning to model poisoning adversaries, who can take advantage of the very privacy these models are designed to provide.
In future work, we plan to explore more sophisticated detection strategies at the server, which can provide guarantees against the type of attacker we have considered here.
In particular, notions of distances between weight distributions are promising defensive tools.
Our attacks in this paper demonstrate that federated learning in its basic form is very vulnerable to model poisoning adversaries, as are recently proposed Byzantine resilient aggregation mechanisms.
While detection mechanisms can make these attacks more challenging, they can be overcome, demonstrating that multi-party machine learning algorithms robust to attackers of the type considered here must be developed.

assistant: text: Effective model poisoning attacks on federated learning able to cause high-confidence targeted misclassification of desired inputs