user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Learning Covariate-Specific Embeddings with Tensor Decompositions

Paper content:
Word embedding is a useful approach to capture co-occurrence structures in a large corpus of text.
In addition to the text data itself, we often have additional covariates associated with individual documents in the corpus---e.g. the demographic of the author, time and venue of publication, etc.---and we would like the embedding to naturally capture the information of the covariates.
In this paper, we propose a new tensor decomposition model for word embeddings with covariates.
Our model jointly learns a \emph{base} embedding for all the words as well as a weighted diagonal transformation to model how each covariate modifies the base embedding.
To obtain the specific embedding for a particular author or venue, for example, we can then simply multiply the base embedding by the transformation matrix associated with that time or venue.
The main advantages of our approach is data efficiency and interpretability of the covariate transformation matrix.
Our experiments demonstrate that our joint model learns substantially better embeddings conditioned on each covariate compared to the standard approach of learning a separate embedding for each covariate using only the relevant subset of data.
Furthermore, our model encourages the embeddings to be ``topic-aligned'' in the sense that the dimensions have specific independent meanings.
This allows our covariate-specific embeddings to be compared by topic, enabling downstream differential analysis.
We empirically evaluate the benefits of our algorithm on several datasets, and demonstrate how it can be used to address many natural questions about the effects of covariates.
The use of factorizations of co-occurrence statistics in learning low-dimensional representations of words is an area that has received a large amount of attention in recent years, perhaps best represented by how widespread algorithms such as GloVe BID10 and Word2Vec BID8 are in downstream applications.
In particular, suppose we have a set of words i ∈ [n], where n is the size of the vocabulary.
The aim is to, for a fixed dimensionality d, assign a vector v i ∈ R d to each word in the vocabulary in a way that preserves semantic structure.In many settings, we have a corpus with additional covariates on individual documents.
For example, we might have news articles from both conservative and liberal-leaning publications, and using the same word embedding for all the text can lose interesting information.
Furthermore, we suggest that there are meaningful semantic relationships that can be captured by exploiting the differences in these conditional statistics.
To this end, we propose the following two key questions that capture the problems that our work addresses, and for each, we give a concrete motivating example of a problem in the semantic inference literature that it encompasses.Question 1: How can we leverage conditional co-occurrence statistics to capture the effect of a covariate on word usage?For
example, did William Shakespeare truly write all the works credited to him, or have there been other "ghostwriters" who have contributed to the Shakespeare canon? This
is the famous Shakespeare authorship question, for which historians have proposed various candidates as the true authors of particular plays or poems BID5 . If the
latter scenario is the case, what in particular distinguishes the writing style of one candidate from another, and how can we infer who the most likely author of a work is from a set of candidates?Question
2: Traditional factorization-based embedding methods are rotationally invariant, so that individual dimensions do not have semantic meaning. How can
we break this invariance to yield a model which aligns topics with interpretable dimensions?There has
been much interest in the differences in language and rhetoric that appeal to different demographics. For example
, studies have been done regarding "ideological signatures" specific to voters by partisan alignment (Robinson et al.) in which linguistic differences were proposed along focal axes, such as the "mind versus the body" in texts with more liberal or conservative ideologies. How can we
systematically infer topical differences such as these between different communities?Questions such
as these, or more broadly covariate-specific trends in word usage, motivated this study. Concretely, our
goal is to provide a general framework through which embeddings of sets of objects with co-occurrence structure, as well as the effects of conditioning on particular covariates, can be learned jointly. As a byproduct,
our model also gives natural meaning to the different dimensions of the embeddings, by breaking the rotational symmetry of previous embedding-learning algorithms, such that the resulting vector representations of words and covariates are "topic-aligned".Previous Work Typically
, algorithms for learning embeddings rely on the intuition that some function of the co-occurrence statistics is low rank. Studies such as GloVe
and Word2Vec proposed based on minimizing low-rank approximation-error of nonlinear transforms of the co-occurrence statistics. let A be the n × n matrix
with A ij the co-occurrence between words i and j, where co-occurrence is defined as the (possibly weighted) number of times the words occur together in a window of fixed length. For example, GloVe aimed
to find vectors v i ∈ R d and biases b i ∈ R such that the loss DISPLAYFORM0 was minimized, where f was some fixed increasing weight function. Word2Vec aimed to learn
vector representations via minimizing a neural-network based loss function.A related embedding approach is to directly perform principal component analysis on the PMI (pointwise mutual information) matrix of the words (Bullinaria & Levy) . PMI-factorization based
methods aim to find vectors {v i } such that DISPLAYFORM1 where the probabilities are taken over the co-occurrence matrix. This is essentially the
same as finding a low-rank matrix V such that V T V ≈ P M I, and empirical results show that the resulting embedding captures useful semantic structure.The ideas of several previous studies on the geometry of word embeddings was helpful in formulating our model. A random-walk based mathematical
framework for understanding these different successful learning algorithms was proposed BID1 , in which the corpus generation process is a random process driven by the random walk of a discrete-time discourse vector c t ∈ R d . In this framework, our work can
be thought of as analyzing the effects of covariates on the random walk transition kernel and the stationary distribution. Additionally, there have been previous
studies of "multi-sense" word embeddings BID11 BID9 , which is similar to our idea that the same word can have different meanings in different contexts. However, in the multi-sense setting, the
idea is that the word intrinsically has different meanings (for example, "crane" can be an action, a bird, or a vehicle), whereas in ours, the different meanings are imposed by conditioning on a covariate. Finally, tensor methods have been used in
other settings recently, such as collaborative filtering BID13 and (Li & Farias) , to learn the effects of conditioning on some summary statistics.Our Contributions There are several reasons why a joint learning model based on tensor factorization is more desirable than performing GloVe m times, where m is the number of covariates, so that each covariate-specific corpus has its own embedding. Our main contributions are a decomposition
algorithm that addresses these issues, and the methods for systematic analysis we propose.The first issue that arises is sample complexity. In particular, because for the most part words
are used in roughly similar ways across different contexts, the resulting embeddings should not be too different, except perhaps along specific dimensions. Thus, it is better to jointly train an embedding
model along the covariates to aggregate the co-occurrence structure, especially in cases where the entire corpus is large, but many conditional corpuses (conditioned on a covariate) are small. Secondly, simply training a different embedding
for each corpus makes it difficult to compare the embeddings across the covariate dimension. Because of issues such as rotation invariance of
GloVelike models, specific dimensions mean different things across different runs (and initializations) of these algorithms. The model we propose has the additional property
that it induces a natural basis to view the embeddings in, one which is "topic-aligned" in the sense that it is not rotation-invariant and thus implies independent topic meanings given to different dimensions.Paper Organization In section 2, we provide our embedding algorithm, as well as mathematical justification for its design. In section 3, we detail our dataset. In section
4, we validate our algorithm with respect
to intrinsic properties and standard metrics. In section 5, we propose several experiments for systematic
downstream analysis.

assistant: text: Using the same embedding across covariates doesn't make sense, we show that a tensor decomposition algorithm learns sparse covariate-specific embeddings and naturally separable topics jointly and data-efficiently.