user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Data-dependent Gaussian Prior Objective for Language Generation

Paper content:
For typical sequence prediction problems such as language generation, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) has commonly been adopted as it encourages the predicted sequence most consistent with the ground-truth sequence to have the highest probability of occurring.
However, MLE focuses on once-to-all matching between the predicted sequence and gold-standard, consequently treating all incorrect predictions as being equally incorrect.
We refer to this drawback as {\it negative diversity ignorance} in this paper.
Treating all incorrect predictions as equal unfairly downplays the nuance of these sequences' detailed token-wise structure.
To counteract this, we augment the MLE loss by introducing an extra Kullback--Leibler divergence term derived by comparing a data-dependent Gaussian prior and the detailed training prediction.
The proposed data-dependent Gaussian prior objective (D2GPo) is defined over a prior topological order of tokens and is poles apart from the data-independent Gaussian prior (L2 regularization) commonly adopted in smoothing the training of MLE.
Experimental results show that the proposed method makes effective use of a more detailed prior in the data and has improved performance in typical language generation tasks, including supervised and unsupervised machine translation, text summarization, storytelling, and image captioning.
Language understanding is the crown jewel of artificial intelligence.
As the well-known dictum by Richard Feynman states, "what I cannot create, I do not understand."
Language generation therefore reflects the level of development of language understanding.
Language generation models have seen remarkable advances in recent years, especially with the rapid development of deep neural networks (DNNs).
There are several models typically used in language generation, namely sequenceto-sequence (seq2seq) models (Kalchbrenner & Blunsom, 2013; Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015; Luong et al., 2015; Vaswani et al., 2017) , generative adversarial networks (GANs) (Goodfellow et al., 2014) , variational autoencoders (Kingma & Welling, 2013) , and auto-regressive networks (Larochelle & Murray, 2011; Van Oord et al., 2016) .
Language generation is usually modeled as a sequence prediction task, which adopts maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) as the standard training criterion (i.e., objective).
MLE has had much success owing to its intuitiveness and flexibility.
However, sequence prediction has encountered the following series of problems due to MLE.
• Exposure bias: The model is not exposed to the full range of errors during training.
• Loss mismatch: During training, we maximize the log-likelihood, whereas, during inference, the model is evaluated by a different metric such as BLEU or ROUGE.
• Generation diversity: The generations are dull, generic (Sordoni et al., 2015; Serban et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016a) , repetitive, and short-sighted (Li et al., 2016b ).
• Negative diversity ignorance: MLE fails to assign proper scores to different incorrect model outputs, which means that all incorrect outputs are treated equally during training.
A variety of work has alleviated the above MLE training shortcomings apart from negative diversity ignorance.
Negative diversity ignorance is a result of unfairly downplaying the nuance of sequences' detailed token-wise structure.
When the MLE objective compares its predicted and ground-truth sequences, it takes a once-for-all matching strategy; the predicted sequence is given a binary label, either correct or incorrect.
However, these incorrect training predictions may be quite diverse and letting the model be aware of which incorrect predictions are more incorrect or less incorrect than others may more effectively guide model training.
For instance, an armchair might be mistaken with a deckchair, but it should usually not be mistaken for a mushroom.
To alleviate the issue of the negative diversity ignorance, we add an extra Gaussian prior objective to augment the current MLE training with an extra Kullback-Leibler divergence loss term.
The extra loss is computed by comparing two probability distributions, the first of which is from the detailed model training prediction and the second of which is from a ground-truth token-wise distribution and is defined as a kind of data-dependent Gaussian prior distribution.
The proposed data-dependent Gaussian prior objective (D2GPo) is then injected into the final loss through a KL divergence term.
The D2GPo is poles apart from the commonly adopted data-independent Gaussian prior (L2 regularization) for the purpose of smoothing the training of MLE, which is also directly added into the MLE loss.
Experimental results show that the proposed method makes effectively use of a more detailed prior in the data and improves the performance of typical language generation tasks, including supervised and unsupervised machine translation, text summarization, storytelling, and image captioning.
This work proposed a data-dependent Gaussian prior objective (D2GPo) for language generation tasks with the hope of alleviating the difficulty of negative diversity ignorance.
D2GPo imposes the prior from (linguistic) data over the sequence prediction models.
D2GPo outperformed strong baselines in experiments on classic language generation tasks (i.e., neural machine translation, text summarization, storytelling, and image captioning tasks).

assistant: text: We introduce an extra data-dependent Gaussian prior objective to augment the current MLE training, which is designed to capture the prior knowledge in the ground-truth data.