user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: CLN2INV: Learning Loop Invariants with Continuous Logic Networks

Paper content:
Program verification offers a framework for ensuring program correctness and therefore systematically eliminating different classes of bugs.
Inferring loop invariants is one of the main challenges behind automated verification of real-world programs which often contain many loops.
In this paper, we present Continuous Logic Network (CLN), a novel neural architecture for automatically learning loop invariants directly from program execution traces.
Unlike existing neural networks, CLNs can learn precise and explicit representations of formulas in Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT)  for loop invariants from program execution traces.
We develop a new sound and complete semantic mapping for assigning SMT formulas to continuous truth values that allows CLNs to be trained efficiently.
We use CLNs to implement a new inference system for loop invariants, CLN2INV, that significantly outperforms existing approaches on the popular Code2Inv dataset.
CLN2INV is the first tool to solve all 124 theoretically solvable problems in the Code2Inv dataset.
Moreover, CLN2INV takes only 1.1 second on average for each problem, which is 40 times faster than existing approaches.
We further demonstrate that CLN2INV can even learn 12 significantly more complex loop invariants than the ones required for the Code2Inv dataset.
Program verification offers a principled approach for systematically eliminating different classes of bugs and proving the correctness of programs.
However, as programs have become increasingly complex, real-world program verification often requires prohibitively expensive manual effort (Wilcox et al., 2015; Gu et al., 2016; Chajed et al., 2019) .
Recent efforts have focused on automating the program verification process, but automated verification of general programs with unbounded loops remains an open problem (Nelson et al., 2017; .
Verifying programs with loops requires determining loop invariants, which captures the effect of the loop on the program state irrespective of the actual number of loop iterations.
Automatically inferring correct loop invariants is a challenging problem that is undecidable in general and difficult to solve in practice (Blass & Gurevich, 2001; Furia et al., 2014) .
Existing approaches use stochastic search (Sharma & Aiken, 2016) , heurstics-based search (Galeotti et al., 2015) , PAC learning based on counter examples (Padhi & Millstein, 2017) , or reinforcement learning (Si et al., 2018) .
However, these approaches often struggle to learn complex, real-world loop invariants.
In this paper, we introduce a new approach to learning loop invariants by modeling the loop behavior from program execution traces using a new type of neural architecture.
We note that inferring loop invariants can be posed as learning formulas in Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) (Biere et al., 2009 ) over program variables collected from program execution traces (Nguyen et al., 2017) .
In principle, Neural networks seem well suited to this task because they can act as universal function approximators and have been successfully applied in various domains that require modeling of arbitrary functions (Hornik et al., 1989; Goodfellow et al., 2016) .
However, loop invariants must be represented as explicit SMT formulas to be usable for program verification.
Unfortunately, existing methods for extracting logical rules from general neural architectures lack sufficient precision (Augasta & Kathirvalavakumar, 2012) , while inductive logic learning lacks sufficient expressiveness for use in verification (Evans & Grefenstette, 2018) .
We address this issue by developing a novel neural architecture, Continuous Logic Network (CLN), which is able to efficiently learn explicit and precise representations of SMT formulas by using continuous truth values.
Unlike existing neural architectures, CLNs can represent a learned SMT formula explicitly in its structure and thus allow us to precisely extract the exact formula from a trained model.
In order to train CLNs, we introduce a new semantic mapping for SMT formulas to continuous truth values.
Our semantic mapping builds on BL, or basic fuzzy logic (Hájek, 2013) , to support general SMT formulas in a continuous logic setting.
We further prove that our semantic model is sound (i.e., truth assignments for the formulas are consistent with their discrete counterparts) and complete (i.e., all formulas can be represented) with regard to the discrete SMT formula space.
These properties allow CLNs to represent any quantifier-free SMT formula operating on mixed integer-real arithmetic as an end-to-end differentiable series of operations.
We use CLNs to implement a new inference system for loop invariants, CLN2INV, that significantly outperforms state-of-the-art tools on the Code2Inv dataset by solving all 124 theoretically solvable problems in the dataset.
This is 20 problems more than LoopInvGen, the winner of the SyGus 2018 competition loop invariant track (Padhi & Millstein, 2017) .
Moreover, CLN2INV finds invariants for each program in 1.1 second on average, more than 40 times faster than LoopInvGen.
We also demonstrate that CLN2INV is able to learn complex, real-world loop invariants with combinations of conjunctions and disjunctions of multivariable constraints.
Our main contributions are:
• We introduce a new semantic mapping for assigning continuous truth values to SMT formulas that is theoretically grounded and enables learning formulas through backpropagation.
We further prove that our semantic model is sound and complete.
• We develop a novel neural architecture, Continuous Logic Networks (CLNs), that to the best of our knowledge is the first to efficiently learn precise and explicit SMT formulas by construction.
• We use CLNs to implement a new loop invariant inference system, CLN2INV, that is the first to solve all 124 theoretically solvable problems in the Code2Inv dataset, 20 more than the existing methods.
CLN2INV is able to find invariants for each problem in 1.1 second on average, 40× faster than existing systems.
• We further show CLN2INV is able to learn 12 more complex loop invariants than the ones present in the Code2Inv dataset with combinations of multivariable constraints.
Related Work.
Traditionally, loop invariant learning relies on stochastic or heuristics-guided search (Sharma & Aiken, 2016; Galeotti et al., 2015) .
Other approaches like NumInv analyze traces and discover conjunctions of equalities by solving a system of linear equations (Sharma et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2017) .
LoopInvGen uses PAC learning of CNF using counter-examples (Padhi et al., 2016; Padhi & Millstein, 2017) .
By contrast, Code2Inv learns to guess loop invariants using reinforcement learning with recurrent and graph neural networks (Si et al., 2018) .
However, these approaches struggle to learn complex invariants.
Unlike these works, CLN2INV efficiently learns complex invariants directly from execution traces.
There is a extensive work on PAC learning of boolean formulas, but learning precise formulas require a prohibitively large number of samples (Kearns et al., 1994) .
Several recent works use differentiable logic to learn boolean logic formulas from noisy data (Kimmig et al., 2012; Evans & Grefenstette, 2018; Payani & Fekri, 2019) or improving adversarial robustness by applying logical rules to training (Fischer et al., 2019) .
By contrast, our work learns precise SMT formulas directly by construction, allowing us to learn richer predicates with compact representation in a noiseless setting.
A variety of numerical relaxations have been applied to SAT and SMT solving.
Application-specific approximations using methods such as interval overapproximation and slack variables have been developed for different classes of SMT (Eggers et al., 2008; Nuzzo et al., 2010) .
More recent work has applied recurrent and graph neural networks to Circuit SAT problems and unsat core detection (Amizadeh et al., 2019; Selsam et al., 2019; Selsam & Bjørner, 2019) .
FastSMT uses embeddings from natural language processing like skip-gram and bag-of-words to represent formulas for search strategy optimization (Balunovic et al., 2018) .
Unlike these approaches, we relax the SMT semantics directly to generate a differentiable representation of SMT.
We develop a novel neural architecture that explicitly and precisely learns SMT formulas by construction.
We achieve this by introducing a new sound and complete semantic mapping for SMT that enables learning formulas through backpropagation.
We use CLNs to implement a loop invariant inference system, CLN2INV, that is the first to solve all theoretically solvable problems in the Code2Inv benchmark and takes only 1.1 second on average.
We believe that the CLN architecture will also be beneficial for other domains that require learning SMT formulas.
A CONTINUOUS PREDICATES Figure 5 shows examples of shifted sigmoids for S(>), S(≥), and S(=).
Combing these results, we have
For any t-norm, we have 0 ⊗ 1 = 0, 1 ⊗ 1 = 1, and 1 ⊗ 0 = 0.
Put it altogether, we have
(f (t, u; B, ) ⊗ g(t, u; B, )) = 1 t = u 0 t = u which concludes the proof.

assistant: text: We introduce the Continuous Logic Network (CLN), a novel neural architecture for automatically learning loop invariants and general SMT formulas.