user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Now I Remember! Episodic Memory For Reinforcement Learning

Paper content:
Humans rely on episodic memory constantly, in remembering the name of someone they met 10 minutes ago, the plot of a movie as it unfolds, or where they parked the car.
Endowing reinforcement learning agents with episodic memory is a key step on the path toward replicating human-like general intelligence.
We analyze why standard RL agents lack episodic memory today, and why existing RL tasks don't require it.
We design a new form of external memory called Masked Experience Memory, or MEM, modeled after key features of human episodic memory.
To evaluate episodic memory we define an RL task based on the common children's game of Concentration.
We find that a MEM RL agent leverages episodic memory effectively to master Concentration, unlike the baseline agents we tested.
From a neurobiological perspective, episodic memory is a key component of human life -remembering the name of a new acquaintance, recalling the plot of a movie as it unfolds, or realizing where the car is parked, are all examples of how we use episodic memory 1 to store and recall novel information.
If a person's ability to form and retrieve new episodic memories is lost, as in advanced Alzheimer's disease, the person is severely incapacitated as a result.
Although today's standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents possess forms of procedural and semantic memory BID10 , they lack any functional equivalent of episodic memory.
Our motivation is to expand the general intelligence of RL agents by imbuing them with a useful form of episodic memory.Human episodic memories appear to be records of experience that are re-experienced when associatively recalled BID8 .
In RL, fundamental experiences are termed observations.
Accordingly, we propose the following working definition: Episodic memory for an RL agent is the ability to leverage details of a past observation that is similar to the current observation.
This definition implies that an agent would exercise episodic memory by doing certain things at specific points in time, including
1. At the time of the old observation, the details of that observation must be stored somewhere in the agent.
This stored record is the episodic memory.
2. Later, when another observation arrives, it must somehow be compared with the stored observations.
If one of those is sufficiently similar, then the details of the old observation must be retrieved from memory.
There are different implementations of similarity and retrieval.
We will propose a concrete one later.
3. After retrieving the details of the old observation that is similar to the new one, the agent must be able to utilize that information to benefit it's pursuit of reward.Designing an RL agent with episodic memory is one challenge, and designing an RL task to evaluate episodic memory in an agent is another.
The main difficulty is that unless the task is very carefully designed, the RL agent may find a way to solve the task using other learning abilities besides episodic memory.
To illustrate, we briefly introduce the RL task that we will present later in detail.To evaluate an agent's episodic memory ability, we introduce the Concentration task based on the card game of the same name.
Concentration is a memory game with the goal of identifying matching pairs of cards among a large set of face-down cards.
During play, one card at a time is temporarily revealed to the player who must correctly memorize and recall the locations of each pair.
Concentration tests episodic memory by requiring an agent to leverage past observations of cards and their locations in order to succeed.
In our variant of Concentration, cards are not limited to the standard deck and are instead randomly generated for each game, so each card pair is unique and never before seen in the agent's lifetime.
Unique cards test the agent's ability to use episodic memory to reason about the identities and locations of the cards that are seen within the current episode, rather than learning to recognize specific cards.Recently, the capabilities of intelligent agents have greatly expanded through the combination of deep learning and reinforcement learning.
Deep RL agents have achieved notable success outperforming humans on Atari games BID15 .
However, many of the hardest tasks in which RL agents still fail to surpass humans are fraught with the difficulties of sparse rewards, partial observability, and a limited amount of samples.
Equipping an RL agent with memory is a promising approach to tackling some of these challenges, and has attracted a growing amount of interest in the research community.Recurrent neural networks such as LSTMs are commonly used as controllers BID13 .
LSTMs can be trained to maintain and use information on timescales of tens of steps, but have trouble learning over longer sequences.
Additionally, LSTMs do not store observations as discrete entities, so it is unclear how an LSTM could compare a never-before-seen observation (such as a unique card) with detailed instances of past observations, which also may have occurred only once.Memory augmented neural networks provide storage capabilities beyond those of an LSTM.
One such architecture, the differentiable neural computer (DNC) has been shown to be capable of handling several different memory-based tasks.
We evaluate the DNC on Concentration, but discover that it has difficulty reusing elements of its memory matrix.The key contributions of this paper are:• We propose a working definition of episodic memory for RL agents.•
We introduce the Concentration task for evaluating episodic memory.•
We present the Masked Experience Memory (MEM) architecture, a new type of external memory designed to provide an RL agent with human-inspired episodic memory, and incorporating a novel improvement over cosine similarity for content-based addressing.•
We empirically demonstrate that MEM successfully enables an RL agent to solve the Concentration task by remembering the identities and locations of cards it has seen only once.•
We show that baseline RL agents (LSTM-based and DNC-based) fail to solve the task.
The optimal mean performance attainable by an agent with perfect episodic memory is shown at the top of FIG2 BID27 .
Only the MEM agent learned a near-optimal policy.
The baseline LSTM-A3C agent's results were overlapped with those of its colorblind version 3b, demonstrating that the LSTM-A3C agent never learned to remember the locations of the cards it saw.
The Sonnet LSTM agent performed consistently better than the TensorFlow LSTM agent 3b, though not by a large amount.
Both implementations claim to be based on BID30 , so the difference in behavior is unexpected.Despite being unable to see the card faces, the colorblind MEM agent 3b still performed a bit better than any of the LSTM agents, indicating that it found some other strategy (not based on card faces) to derive a small amount of gain from its external memory.Even after dozens of trial settings over a wide range of hyper-parameters, the DNC agent performed only very slightly better than the LSTM-A3C agent, and noticeably worse than its own recurrent controller alone, the Sonnet LSTM agent.
We did not attempt curriculum learning.
Appendix A presents a detailed investigation into the causes of DNC's poor performance on this type of task.Performing ablation studies on the MEM architecture, we found that using the mask (instead of cosine similarity) and Euclidean distance squared were both essential to scoring above the LSTM-A3C baseline.
Adaptation of the sharpness term turned out to be essential for stable results.
On the other hand, the similarity strength feature provided no measurable benefit.As intended, MEM's most positive learned mask weights were the ones for the six card face dimensions.
At convergence of the best MEM model, 83% of the mask's mass was concentrated on those six elements, even though they constitute only 11% of the observation vector's 54 elements.
We have defined episodic memory for RL agents, provided an unambiguous test for evaluating it, and presented an implementation of episodic memory that corrects a problem with current content-based addressing methods.
Our results show that this MEM architecture, designed to emulate specific aspects of human episodic memory, is able to use that memory effectively in the Concentration task by remembering the locations of cards it has seen only once before.
This is in sharp contrast to the other agents tested, which never learned to remember card locations.
The code to replicate this work will be made public prior to the conference.MEM represents the initial step on a path towards more robust and powerful episodic memory for RL agents.
We plan to extend MEM in several significant ways:1.
Making the mask weights context-sensitive so that read key vectors can quickly shift to cover different aspects of experience depending on the situation.
2. Expanding the memory dimensions beyond the current observation to also include recurrent network activations, so that an agent's internal thought vectors can themselves be stored as experiences for later recall, and can be used as read keys.
3. Rendering memory deletion a function of memory importance, so that certain experiences can be remembered longer than others.
4. Introducing an additional mask over dimensions for write operations, so that memories need not cover all available dimensions.The human mind offers a remote, shining existence proof of general intelligence still beyond our reach.
Despite the distance, it lights our path, and grows brighter with each step we take toward it.

assistant: text: Implementing and evaluating episodic memory for RL.