user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Neuron Hierarchical Networks

Paper content:
In this paper, we propose a neural network framework called neuron hierarchical network (NHN), that evolves beyond the hierarchy in layers, and concentrates on the hierarchy of neurons.
We observe mass redundancy in the weights of both handcrafted and randomly searched architectures.
Inspired by the development of human brains, we prune low-sensitivity neurons in the model and add new neurons to the graph, and the relation between individual neurons are emphasized and the existence of layers weakened.
We propose a process to discover the best base model by random architecture search, and discover the best locations and connections of the added neurons by evolutionary search.
Experiment results show that the NHN achieves higher test accuracy on Cifar-10 than state-of-the-art handcrafted and randomly searched architectures, while requiring much fewer parameters and less searching time.
Neural networks can be designed either by human experts or search algorithms, both of which have gained great success in image classification and language modeling BID45 BID33 .
Network architectures designed by both means are mostly layer-based or block-based, which means that the fundamental components are either operation layers or blocks that consist of several layers.
A clear tendency can be observed that models with more parameters generally have better performances.
It is a well-established fact that redundancy of parameters exists widely in handcrafted neural networks BID16 BID41 BID25 .
We find that such claim holds for architectures discovered by random search or evolutionary search as well.
The pruning of unimportant neurons emphasizes the hierarchical relation between individual neurons.
Additionally, the decrease in accuracy after parameter reduction is generally inevitable.
Therefore, we propose a heuristic procedure to construct neuron-based network architectures by pruning redundant connections and neurons in layer-based models and adding new neurons to strengthen the neuron hierarchy while achieving competitive performances as layer-hierarchy models.
Experiments show that NHN achieves higher test accuracy than DenseNet , SMASH BID4 and hierarchical representation with much fewer parameters.Handcrafted architectures.
Successful convolutional neural networks (CNNs) designed by human experts can be sketchily categorized by the way data flow through the networks, i.e., plain networks and branching networks.
A notable example of plain networks would be VGG nets BID37 , where there are only one input and output path in each hidden layer.
However, in a branching network, the computation flow splits somewhere in the network and merges in a latter layer BID0 .
The splitting and aggregation may occur multiple times in a single network.
Many have discovered numerous branching network architectures whose performances surpass plain ones while requiring fewer parameters.
Skip connections BID17 BID18 are increasingly popular in improving the performance of deep neural networks, and it becomes common to observe additional convolutions (or other forms of operations) stacked between large layers BID24 BID40 .
In fact, the "stacked-between" operations can be considered as part of a generalized residual block.
Multi-branching computation graphs benefit addressing the gradient vanishing problem during the gradient descent training BID18 .
The distinguished techniques mentioned above (plus more listed in Table 1 ) share the same idea of weakening the hierarchy between layers by introducing complex paths to the data flow.
The idea is further highlighted by architecture search algorithms.
Random and evolutionary architectures.
Machine learning algorithms evolve fast.
Designing neural networks that perform remarkably on a given task requires ample experience.
It has been found that neural networks are not only good at autonomically extracting useful features from raw data, but also capable of finding optimal network architectures to that end.
Neural architecture search (NAS) has been attested to its ability to design network architectures for language modeling and image classification.
However, candidate models have to be entirely randomly generated and fully trained, therefore NAS is extremely computation intensive, which dims its competitive performances to handcrafted architectures.
Many efforts have been devoted to reducing the computational costs of NAS while ensuring sufficient capacity of search space BID47 BID5 .
Two major ideas to achieve the purpose are to design individual reusable cells rather than the entire networks or to share trained weights between models.
Recently, BID33 proposed to describe each candidate model as a subgraph of a single directed acyclic graph (DAG).
By sharing weights between submodels, the searching time of NAS is reduced by 1000X in term of GPU-hours.
Genetic algorithms are also applied in searching the optimal architectures of CNNs BID29 BID43 BID34 .
BID35 proposed regularized evolution (RE) to remove the oldest models from the population, instead of removing the worst ones as in traditional tournament selection BID14 .
The best CNN model discovered by RE achieves the state-of-the-art performance on Cifar-10, i.e., 2.13% test accuracy on average.
However, the number of parameters it requires is as large as nearly 35 million.
Convolutional neural fabrics (CNF) BID36 BID42 and other forms of random search methods BID2 BID4 BID10 have been investigated as well.Layer-wise to neuron-wise hierarchy.
Take the best model discovered by macro search in ENAS BID33 for example.
The 12-layer CNN model contains over 21 million parameters and achieves 4.23% test accuracy on Cifar-10.
If we remove 75% − 90% parameters in all 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 convolutions, the test accuracy is hardly compromised after the same duration of retraining.
Even though the architectures in all the search methods are described as directed graphs, each node in these graphs represents either an operation layer (e.g. convolution or pooling layer) or an operation block (e.g. residual block).
None of the nodes stands for an actual individual neuron in the network.
On one hand, random search and evolutionary search tend to discover architectures that contain complex branching paths.
On the other hand, the pruned versions of such architectures work nearly as well as intact ones.
These facts bring about the hypothesis that the hierarchy of neurons should work as well as the hierarchy of layers.
Please note that we do not simply replace layers with individual neurons, considering layers are composed of abundant neurons.
We need the sufficient number of neurons to meet the feature representation requirements.
A good hierarchical architecture of neurons may be discovered by either random search or evolutionary search, or combined.
The search process must be carefully designed.In this paper, we propose a three-step course to discover the optimal neuron hierarchy for image classification (see FIG1 , i.e., (1) discover the optimal layer hierarchy with ENAS, (2) prune unimportant neurons in the discovered layer-wise model, and (3) randomly add new neurons to the pruned model to enrich the expressive capacity of neuron hierarchy networks.
It is worth pointing out that the three-step procedure is also an imitation of the natural development of human brains (Craik and Bialystok, 2006).
For example, the creation and searching by ENAS correspond to the mass neurogenesis before birth.
The pruning of unimportant neurons corresponds to the apoptosis before puberty BID11 .
The addition of new neurons to the pruned model corresponds to the persisting neurogenesis during adulthood BID30 .
Although the existence of neurogenesis in mature brains is being debated in the field of neuroscience BID38 BID3 , the software simulation of such process by our work indicates that it is helpful in improving the learning capability of neural networks.
We did not choose fixed or handcrafted architectures as the base model because we believe that experiments conducted on a randomly searched model would be more compelling.
There are also pruning-related issues with fixed models, for example, performances of ResNets and DenseNet are extremely sensitive to pruning.
The training from scratch on the pruned architecture is crucial, because without it, the model only has a test accuracy of 15.7%.
The NHN is not built upon the results by ENAS micro search even though it presents higher test accuracy while requiring fewer parameters than macro search.
It is mainly due to the mass employment of depthwise separable convolution BID7 in which kernels are pairs of vectors and cannot be directly pruned.
If we replace all the depthwise separable convolutions with normal convolutions, the micro model merely gains accuracy advantage of 0.3% over the macro model.
However, it instead contains 67.8M parameters, which is more than 4 times of macro (16.3M).
Also, it will consume more than 28GB of memory space to perform the layer-hierarchy search.
LDS results FIG2 show that add-on neurons at lower layers work better, which indicates that rich representation of low-level features is crucial to the performance of NHN.
When comparing the final test accuracy (96.52%) to the network without any add-on neuron (96.20%), we know that add-on neurons are helpful in increasing the performance of NHN.
In fact, perturbation on the add-on genes discovered by LDS almost always leads to degradation of performance, and the total ablation of added neurons in the final model causes accuracy drop of 1.08%, which proves that the search results are optimal.The main goal of this paper is neither to comprehensively discuss the properties of neuron fields BID12 , nor to investigate a training method on an entirely randomly generated neuron graph.
We'd like to point out that it is quite possible to directly generate a large number of free neurons with somewhat arbitrary connections and train this "random neuron field" to address the same task presented in this work.
However, because modern GPUs, or to be more precise, the computation softwares that run on these GPUs are mainly designed for dense 4-d tensor calculation.
It is hard to efficiently train such random neuron field at present.
Therefore, as sophisticated as our approach may seem, it's an efficient method to construct network architectures that highlight the significance of individual neurons and perform competitively against other state-of-the-art methods.
Neural networks that are designed by human experts and search algorithms perform outstandingly in image classification.
However, redundancy in parameters exists widely in layer-based architectures.
We propose a heuristic method to construct neuron-based architectures, namely, neuron hierarchical networks (NHN) , that obviate the redundancy in weights and emphasize the relation between individual neurons.
Experiments show that the NHN discovered based on ENAS and by locationdirection search (LDS) outperforms the original ENAS architecture and many other handcrafted and randomly searched models in Cifar-10 classification, while requiring much fewer parameters.
Also, the search time of NHN is very efficient compared to several state-of-the-art network architecture search methods, while achieving competitive performance.

assistant: text: By breaking the layer hierarchy, we propose a 3-step approach to the construction of neuron-hierarchy networks that outperform NAS, SMASH and hierarchical representation with fewer parameters and shorter searching time.