user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Generalized Bayesian Posterior Expectation Distillation for Deep Neural Networks

Paper content:
In this paper, we present a general framework for distilling expectations with respect to the Bayesian posterior distribution of a deep neural network, significantly extending prior work on a method known as ``Bayesian Dark Knowledge.
"  Our generalized framework applies to the case of classification models and takes as input the architecture of a ``teacher" network, a general posterior expectation of interest, and the architecture of a ``student" network.
The distillation method performs an online compression of the selected posterior expectation using iteratively generated Monte Carlo samples from the parameter posterior of the teacher model.
We further consider the problem of optimizing the student model architecture with respect to an accuracy-speed-storage trade-off.
We present experimental results investigating multiple data sets, distillation targets,  teacher model architectures, and approaches to searching for student model architectures.
We establish the key result that distilling into a student model with an architecture that matches the teacher, as is done in Bayesian Dark Knowledge, can lead to sub-optimal performance.
Lastly, we show that student architecture search methods can identify student models with significantly improved performance.
Deep learning models have shown promising results in the areas including computer vision, natural language processing, speech recognition, and more (Krizhevsky et al., 2012; Graves et al., 2013a; b; Huang et al., 2016; Devlin et al., 2018) .
However, existing point estimation-based training methods for these models may result in predictive uncertainties that are not well calibrated, including the occurrence of confident errors.
It is well-known that Bayesian inference can often provide more robust posterior predictive distributions in the classification setting compared to the use of point estimation-based training.
However, the integrals required to perform Bayesian inference in neural network models are also well-known to be intractable.
Monte Carlo methods provide one solution to representing neural network parameter posteriors as ensembles of networks, but this can require large amounts of both storage and compute time (Neal, 1996; Welling & Teh, 2011) .
To help overcome these problems, Balan et al. (2015) introduced an interesting model training method referred to as Bayesian Dark Knowledge.
In the classification setting, Bayesian Dark Knowledge attempts to compress the Bayesian posterior predictive distribution induced by the full parameter posterior of a "teacher" network into a "student" network.
The parameter posterior of the teacher network is represented through a Monte Carlo ensemble of specific instances of the teacher network (the teacher ensemble), and the analytically intractable posterior predictive distributions are approximated as Monte Carlo averages over the output of the networks in the teacher ensemble.
The major advantage of this approach is that the computational complexity of prediction at test time is drastically reduced compared to computing Monte Carlo averages over a large ensemble of networks.
As a result, methods of this type have the potential to be much better suited to learning models for deployment in resource constrained settings.
In this paper, we present a Bayesian posterior distillation framework that generalizes the Bayesian Dark Knowledge approach in several significant directions.
The primary modeling and algorithmic contributions of this work are: (1) we generalize the target of distillation in the classification case from the posterior predictive distribution to general posterior expectations; (2) we generalize the student architecture from being restricted to match the teacher architecture to being a free choice in the distillation procedure.
The primary empirical contributions of this work are (1) evaluating the distillation of both the posterior predictive distribution and expected posterior entropy across a range of models and data sets including manipulations of data sets that increase posterior uncertainty; and (2) evaluating the impact of the student model architecture on distillation performance including the investigation of sparsity-inducing regularization and pruning for student model architecture optimization.
The key empirical findings are that (1) distilling into a student model that matches the architecture of the teacher, as in Balan et al. (2015) , can be sub-optimal; and (2) student architecture optimization methods can identify significantly improved student models.
We note that the significance of generalizing distillation to arbitrary posterior expectations is that it allows us to capture a wider range of useful statistics of the posterior that are of interest from an uncertainty quantification perspective.
As noted above, we focus on the case of distilling the expected posterior entropy in addition to the posterior predictive distribution itself.
When combined with the entropy of the posterior predictive distribution, the expected posterior entropy enables disentangling model uncertainty (epistemic uncertainty) from fundamental uncertainty due to class overlap (aleatoric uncertainty).
This distinction is extremely important in determining why predictions are uncertain for a given data case.
Indeed, the difference between these two terms is the basis for the Bayesian active learning by disagreement (BALD) score used in active learning, which samples instances with the goal of minimizing model uncertainty (Houlsby et al., 2011) .
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.
In the next section, we begin by presenting background material and related work in Section 2.
In Section 3, we present the proposed framework and associated Generalized Posterior Expectation Distillation (GPED) algorithm.
In Section 4, we present experiments and results.
Additional details regarding data sets and experiments can be found in Appendix A, with supplemental results included in Appendix B.
We have presented a framework for distilling expectations with respect to the Bayesian posterior distribution of a deep neural network that generalizes the Bayesian Dark Knowledge approach in several significant directions.
Our results show that the performance of posterior distillation can be highly sensitive to the architecture of the student model, but that basic architecture search methods can help to identify student model architectures with improved speed-storage-accuracy trade-offs.
There are many directions for future work including considering the distillation of a broader class of posterior statistics including percentiles, assessing and developing more advanced student model architecture search methods, and applying the framework to larger state-of-the-art models.
A DATASETS AND MODEL DETAILS

assistant: text: A general framework for distilling Bayesian posterior expectations for deep neural networks.