user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Learning To Generate Reviews and Discovering Sentiment

Paper content:
We explore the properties of byte-level recurrent language models.
When given sufficient amounts of capacity, training data, and compute time, the representations learned by these models include disentangled features corresponding to high-level concepts.
Specifically, we find a single unit which performs sentiment analysis.
These representations, learned in an unsupervised manner, achieve state of the art on the binary subset of the Stanford Sentiment Treebank.
They are also very data efficient.
When using only a handful of labeled examples, our approach matches the performance of strong baselines trained on full datasets.
We also demonstrate the sentiment unit has a direct influence on the generative process of the model.
Simply fixing its value to be positive or negative generates samples with the corresponding positive or negative sentiment.
Representation learning BID1 ) plays a critical role in many modern machine learning systems.
Representations map raw data to more useful forms and the choice of representation is an important component of any application.
Broadly speaking, there are two areas of research emphasizing different details of how to learn useful representations.The supervised training of high-capacity models on large labeled datasets is critical to the recent success of deep learning techniques for a wide range of applications such as image classification BID25 ), speech recognition ), and machine translation ).
Analysis of the task specific representations learned by these models reveals many fascinating properties BID58 ).
Image classifiers learn a broadly useful hierarchy of feature detectors re-representing raw pixels as edges, textures, and objects BID55 ).
In the field of computer vision, it is now commonplace to reuse these representations on a broad suite of related tasks -one of the most successful examples of transfer learning to date BID42 ).There
is also a long history of unsupervised representation learning BID41 ). Much
of the early research into modern deep learning was developed and validated via this approach BID14 ; BID17 ; BID49 ; BID4 ; BID27 ). Unsupervised
learning is promising due to its ability to scale beyond the small subsets and subdomains of data that can be cleaned and labeled given resource, privacy, or other constraints. This advantage
is also its difficulty. While supervised
approaches have clear objectives that can be directly optimized, unsupervised approaches rely on proxy tasks such as reconstruction, density estimation, or generation, which do not directly encourage useful representations for specific tasks. As a result, much
work has gone into designing objectives, priors, and architectures meant to encourage the learning of useful representations. We refer readers
to for a detailed review.Despite these difficulties, there are notable applications of unsupervised learning. Pre-trained word
vectors are a vital part of many modern NLP systems BID5 ). These representations
, learned by modeling word co-occurrences, increase the data efficiency and generalization capability of NLP systems BID45 ; BID3 ). Topic modelling can
also discover factors within a corpus of text which align to human interpretable concepts such as "art" or "education" BID2 ).How to learn representations
of phrases, sentences, and documents is an open area of research. Inspired by the success of word
vectors, BID23 propose skip-thought vectors, a method of training a sentence encoder by predicting the preceding and following sentence. The representation learned by this
objective performs competitively on a broad suite of evaluated tasks. More advanced training techniques
such as layer normalization BID0 ) further improve results. However, skip-thought vectors are
still outperformed by supervised models which directly optimize the desired performance metric on a specific dataset. This is the case for both text classification
tasks, which measure whether a specific concept is well encoded in a representation, and more general semantic similarity tasks. This occurs even when the datasets are relatively
small by modern standards, often consisting of only a few thousand labeled examples.In contrast to learning a generic representation on one large dataset and then evaluating on other tasks/datasets, BID6 proposed using similar unsupervised objectives such as sequence autoencoding and language modeling to first pretrain a model on a dataset and then finetune it for a given task. This approach outperformed training the same model
from random initialization and achieved state of the art on several text classification datasets. Combining word-level language modelling of a dataset
with topic modelling and fitting a small neural network feature extractor on top has also achieved strong results on document level sentiment analysis BID7 ).Considering this, we hypothesize two effects may be combining
to result in the weaker performance of purely unsupervised approaches. Skip-thought vectors were trained on a corpus of books. But some
of the classification tasks they are evaluated on, such
as sentiment analysis of reviews of consumer goods, do not have much overlap with the text of novels. We propose this distributional issue, combined with the limited
capacity of current models, results in representational underfitting. Current generic distributed sentence representations may be very
lossy -good at capturing the gist, but poor with the precise semantic or syntactic details which are critical for applications.The experimental and evaluation protocols may be underestimating the quality of unsupervised representation learning for sentences and documents due to certain seemingly insignificant design decisions. BID12 also raises concern about current evaluation tasks in their
recent work which provides a thorough survey of architectures and objectives for learning unsupervised sentence representations -including the above mentioned skip-thoughts.In this work, we test whether this is the case. We focus in on the task of sentiment analysis and attempt to learn
an unsupervised representation that accurately contains this concept. BID37 showed that word-level recurrent language modelling supports
the learning of useful word vectors. We are interested in pushing this line of work to learn representations
of not just words but arbitrary scales of text with no distinction between sub-word, word, phrase, sentence, or document-level structure. Recent work has shown that traditional NLP task such as Named Entity Recognition
and Part-of-Speech tagging can be performed this way by processing text as a byte sequence BID10 ). Byte level language modelling is a natural choice due to its simplicity and generality
. We are also interested in evaluating this approach as it is not immediately clear whether
such a low-level training objective supports the learning of high-level representations. We train on a very large corpus picked to have a similar distribution as our task of interest
. We also benchmark on a wider range of tasks to quantify the sensitivity of the learned representation
to various degrees of out-of-domain data and tasks.
It is an open question why our model recovers the concept of sentiment in such a precise, disentangled, interpretable, and manipulable way.
It is possible that sentiment as a conditioning feature has strong predictive capability for language modelling.
This is likely since sentiment is such an important component of a review.
Previous work analyzing LSTM language models showed the existence of interpretable units that indicate position within a line or presence inside a quotation BID20 ).
In many ways, the sentiment unit in this model is just a scaled up example of the same phenomena.
The update equation of an LSTM could play a role.
The element-wise operation of its gates may encourage axis-aligned representations.
Models such as word2vec have also been observed to have small subsets of dimensions strongly associated with specific tasks BID28 ).Our
work highlights the sensitivity of learned representations to the data distribution they are trained on. The
results make clear that it is unrealistic to expect a model trained on a corpus of books, where the two most common genres are Romance and Fantasy, to learn an encoding which preserves the exact sentiment of a review. Likewise
, it is unrealistic to expect a model trained on Amazon product reviews to represent the precise semantic content of a caption of an image or a video.There are several promising directions for future work highlighted by our results. The observed
performance plateau, even on relatively similar domains, suggests improving the representation model both in terms of architecture and size. Since our model
operates at the byte-level, hierarchical/multitimescale extensions could improve the quality of representations for longer documents. The sensitivity
of learned representations to their training domain could be addressed by training on a wider mix of datasets with better coverage of target tasks. Finally, our work
encourages further research into language modelling as it demonstrates that the standard language modelling objective with no modifications is sufficient to learn high-quality representations.

assistant: text: Byte-level recurrent language models learn high-quality domain specific representations of text.