user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Unsupervised Deep Structure Learning by Recursive Dependency Analysis

Paper content:
We introduce an unsupervised structure learning algorithm for deep, feed-forward, neural networks.
We propose a new interpretation for depth and inter-layer connectivity where a hierarchy of independencies in the input distribution is encoded in the network structure.
This results in structures allowing neurons to connect to neurons in any deeper layer skipping intermediate layers.
Moreover, neurons in deeper layers encode low-order (small condition sets) independencies and have a wide scope of the input, whereas neurons in the first layers encode higher-order (larger condition sets) independencies and have a narrower scope.
Thus, the depth of the network is automatically determined---equal to the maximal order of independence in the input distribution, which is the recursion-depth of the algorithm.
The proposed algorithm constructs two main graphical models:
1) a generative latent graph (a deep belief network) learned from data and
2) a deep discriminative graph constructed from the generative latent graph.
We prove that conditional dependencies between the nodes in the learned generative latent graph are preserved in the class-conditional discriminative graph.
Finally, a deep neural network structure is constructed based on the discriminative graph.
We demonstrate on image classification benchmarks that the algorithm replaces the deepest layers (convolutional and dense layers) of common convolutional networks, achieving high classification accuracy, while constructing significantly smaller structures.
The proposed structure learning algorithm requires a small computational cost and runs efficiently on a standard desktop CPU.
Over the last decade, deep neural networks have proven their effectiveness in solving many challenging problems in various domains such as speech recognition BID17 , computer vision BID28 BID16 BID46 and machine translation BID9 .
As compute resources became more available, large scale models having millions of parameters could be trained on massive volumes of data, to achieve state-of-the-art solutions for these high dimensionality problems.
Building these models requires various design choices such as network topology, cost function, optimization technique, and the configuration of related hyper-parameters.In this paper, we focus on the design of network topology-structure learning.
Generally, exploration of this design space is a time consuming iterative process that requires close supervision by a human expert.
Many studies provide guidelines for design choices such as network depth BID46 , layer width BID55 , building blocks , and connectivity BID20 BID23 .
Based on these guidelines, these studies propose several meta-architectures, trained on huge volumes of data.
These were applied to other tasks by leveraging the representational power of their convolutional layers and fine-tuning their deepest layers for the task at hand BID21 BID33 .
However, these meta-architecture may be unnecessarily large and require large computational power and memory for training and inference.
The problem of model structure learning has been widely researched for many years in the probabilistic graphical models domain.
Specifically, Bayesian networks for density estimation and causal discovery BID42 BID50 .
Two main approaches were studied: score-based (search-and-score) and constraint-based.
Score-based approaches combine a scoring function, such as BDe BID10 and BIC BID44 , with a strategy for searching through the space of structures, such as greedy equivalence search BID6 .
BID1 introduced an algorithm for sampling deep belief networks (generative model) and demonstrated its applicability to high-dimensional image datasets.Constraint-based approaches BID42 BID50 find the optimal structures in the large sample limit by testing conditional independence (CI) between pairs of variables.
They are generally faster than score-based approaches BID54 ) and have a well-defined stopping criterion (e.g., maximal order of conditional independence).
However, these methods are sensitive to errors in the independence tests, especially in the case of high-order conditional-independence tests and small training sets.Motivated by these methods, we propose a new interpretation for depth and inter-layer connectivity in deep neural networks.
We derive a structure learning algorithm such that a hierarchy of independencies in the input distribution is encoded in the network structure, where the first layers encode higher-order independencies than deeper layers.
Thus, the number of layers is automatically determined.
Moreover, a neuron in a layer is allowed to connect to neurons in deeper layers skipping intermediate layers.
An example of a learned structure, for MNIST, is given in Figure 1 .We
describe our recursive algorithm in two steps. In
Section 2 we describe a base case-a singlelayer structure learning. In
Section 3 we describe multi-layer structure learning by applying the key concepts of the base case, recursively (proofs are provided in Appendix A). In
Section 4 we discuss related work. We
provide experimental results in Section 5, and conclude in Section 6. DISPLAYFORM0
a set of latent variables, and Y a class variable. Our algorithm
constructs three graphical models and an auxiliary graph. Each variable
is represented by a single node and a single edge may connect two distinct nodes. Graph G is a
generative DAG defined over the observed and latent variables X ∪ H. Graph G Inv is called a stochastic inverse of G. Graph G D is a discriminative model defined over the observed, latent, and class variables X ∪ H ∪ Y . An auxiliary
graph G X is defined over X (a CPDAG; an equivalence class of a Bayesian network) and is generated and maintained as an internal state of the algorithm. The parents
set of a node X in G is denoted P a(X; G). The order of
an independence relation is defined to be the condition set size. For example,
if X 1 and X 2 are independent given X 3 and X 4 , denoted X 1 ⊥ ⊥ X 2 |{X 3 , X 4 }, then the independence order is two. Figure 1 : An
example of a structure learned by our algorithm (classifying MNIST digits). Neurons in a
layer may connect to neurons in any deeper layer. Depth is determined
automatically. Each gather layer selects
a subset of the input, where each input variable is gathered only once. A neural route, starting
with a gather layer, passes through densely connected layers where it may split (copy) and merge (concatenate) with other routes in correspondence with the hierarchy of independencies identified by the algorithm. All routes merge into the
final output layer (e.g., a softmax layer).
We presented a principled approach for learning the structure of deep neural networks.
Our proposed algorithm learns in an unsupervised manner and requires small computational cost.
The resulting structures encode a hierarchy of independencies in the input distribution, where a node in one layer may connect another node in any deeper layer, and depth is determined automatically.We demonstrated that our algorithm learns small structures, and maintains high classification accuracies for common image classification benchmarks.
It is also demonstrated that while convolution layers are very useful at exploiting domain knowledge, such as spatial smoothness, translational invariance, and symmetry, they are mostly outperformed by a learned structure for the deeper layers.
Moreover, while the use of common topologies (meta-architectures), for a variety of classification tasks is computationally inefficient, we would expect our approach to learn smaller and more accurate networks for each classification task, uniquely.As only unlabeled data is required for learning the structure, we expect our approach to be practical for many domains, beyond image classification, such as knowledge discovery, and plan to explore the interpretability of the learned structures.

assistant: text: A principled approach for structure learning of deep neural networks with a new interpretation for depth and inter-layer connectivity.