user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Kaleidoscope: An Efficient, Learnable Representation For All Structured Linear Maps

Paper content:
Modern neural network architectures use structured linear transformations, such as low-rank matrices, sparse matrices, permutations, and the Fourier transform, to improve inference speed and reduce memory usage compared to general linear maps.
However, choosing which of the myriad structured transformations to use (and its associated parameterization) is a laborious task that requires trading off speed, space, and accuracy.
We consider a different approach: we introduce a family of matrices called kaleidoscope matrices (K-matrices) that provably capture any structured matrix with near-optimal space (parameter) and time (arithmetic operation) complexity.
We empirically validate that K-matrices can be automatically learned within end-to-end pipelines to replace hand-crafted procedures, in order to improve model quality.
For example, replacing channel shuffles in ShuffleNet improves classification accuracy on ImageNet by up to 5%.
Learnable K-matrices can also simplify hand-engineered pipelines---we replace filter bank feature computation in speech data preprocessing with a kaleidoscope layer, resulting in only 0.4% loss in accuracy on the TIMIT speech recognition task.
K-matrices can also capture latent structure in models: for a challenging permuted image classification task, adding a K-matrix to a standard convolutional architecture can enable learning the latent permutation and improve accuracy by over 8 points.
We provide a practically efficient implementation of our approach, and use K-matrices in a Transformer network to attain 36% faster end-to-end inference speed on a language translation task.
Structured linear maps are fundamental and ubiquitous in modern machine learning.
Their efficiency in speed (fast algorithms) and space (few parameters) can reduce computation and memory usage.
They include fixed specialized transforms such as the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and Hadamard transform used in signal processing (Cooley et al., 1969) , convolutions for image, language, and speech modeling (Gu et al., 2018) , and low-rank and sparse matrices for efficient storage and inference on edge devices (Yu et al., 2017) .
Forms of structure such as sparsity have been at the forefront of recent advances in ML (Frankle & Carbin, 2019) , and are critical for on-device and energy-efficient models, two application areas of tremendous recent interest (Tsidulko, 2019; Schwartz et al., 2019) .
There are a plethora of classes of structured linear maps, each with a significantly different representation, algorithm, and implementation.
They have different tradeoffs in terms of inference speed, training speed, and accuracy, and the conventional wisdom is that no one class works uniformly well across all applications.
As a result, ML practitioners currently hand-pick specific classes of structured linear maps for each of their applications.
This is a difficult and labor-intensive task.
Ideally, these problems should be addressed with a universal representation for structured linear maps: (i) Such a parameterization should be expressive enough to capture important classes of structure, with a nearly tight parameter count and runtime: the space required to represent the linear map should be close to optimal, and the resulting algorithm for matrix vector multiplication should be close to the fastest possible algorithm.
(ii) The parameterization should be differentiable in order to be learned as a component of end-to-end ML pipelines, enabling it to easily be used as a drop-in replacement for manually engineered structured components.
(iii) The parameterization should admit practically efficient algorithms for training and inference, in terms of both speed and memory.
Currently, no class of structured linear maps satisfies all of these criteria.
Most existing classes of structured matrices-such as the class of low-rank matrices-fail to tightly capture other important types of structure.
For example, the DFT has an efficient structured representation of size O(n log n), yet cannot be well-approximated by a low-rank transform of size n 2 .
Sparsity is another important type of structure; lots of exciting recent work has focused on the design of sparse neural networks.
For instance, sparse networks of comparable quality to their dense counterparts-yet an order of magnitude fewer parameters-may be created via pruning (Han et al., 2016) or by identifying "winning lottery tickets" (Frankle & Carbin, 2019) .
In parallel, recent theoretical results by De Sa et al. (2018) show that sparsity and the notion of structure in linear maps are fundamentally linked: any given matrix can be factored into a product of sparse matrices with total parameter count equal to the efficiency (i.e. minimum arithmetic circuit complexity) of the matrix.
In other words, the representation of linear maps as products of sparse matrices tightly captures all forms of structure.
Unfortunately, actually learning sparse representations is difficult, because it requires finding the matrices' sparsity patterns-a discrete, nondifferentiable search problem.
So, current methods for training sparse neural networks are either expensive (Frankle & Carbin, 2019) , or rely on highly handtuned heuristics for evolving the sparsity patterns throughout training (Dettmers & Zettlemoyer, 2019) .
By contrast, we propose a representation of linear maps as products of sparse matrices with specific predefined sparsity patterns (Section 2), and show that it does satisfy our desiderata: it retains the expressiveness of unstructured sparsity, while being differentiably learnable and efficient like other structured representations.
Concretely, our representation is based on products of a particular building block known as a butterfly matrix (Parker, 1995; Dao et al., 2019) ; we term such products kaleidoscope matrices (K-matrices for short).
1 (i) Our main theoretical contribution (Section 2.3) concerns the expressiveness of this representation: we show that any structured linear map (i.e. one that can be applied using s n 2 arithmetic operations) can be represented as a K-matrix, with a nearly tight number of parameters and algorithmic complexity (both on the order of s up to logarithmic factors).
(ii) The kaleidoscope representation is fully differentiable; thus, all the parameters of a K-matrix can be learned using standard optimization algorithms such as SGD.
(iii) Because of their simple, regular structure, K-matrices are practical and easy to use.
We provide memory-and runtime-efficient implementations of K-matrix multiplication on CPU and GPU for training and inference, with a simple PyTorch interface.
We empirically validate that, due to their expressiveness, learnability, and efficiency, we can use K-matrices as a drop-in replacement for linear components in deep learning models.
In Section 3.1, we use K-matrices to replace hand-crafted structure in two different settings.
We simplify the six steps of filter bank computation in speech preprocessing into a single learnable K-matrix step, with only an 0.4% accuracy drop on the TIMIT speech recognition task.
We use K-matrices to replace channel shuffles in ShuffleNet, improving ImageNet classification accuracy by up to 5%.
In Section 3.2, we show that K-matrices can successfully recover latent structure; a K-matrix is used to learn latent permutations in a permuted image dataset (Permuted CIFAR), resulting in 9 points higher accuracy in a downstream CNN model.
In Section 3.3, we show that our efficient K-matrix multiplication implementation can be applied to speed up real-world tasks: we replace linear layers with K-matrices in a DynamicConv-Transformer network to attain 36% faster end-to-end inference speed with a 1.0 drop in BLEU score on the IWSLT14 German→English translation task.
We address the problem of having to manually choose among the numerous classes of structured linear maps by proposing the universal (expressive, efficient, and learnable) family of kaleidoscope matrices.
We prove that K-matrices can represent any structured linear maps with near-optimal space and time complexity.
Empirical validations suggest that K-matrices are a promising way to employ structure in modern ML; they can be used to reduce the need for hand-engineering, capture challenging latent structure, and improve efficiency in models.
We are excited about future work on further hardware-optimized implementations of K-matrices, to fully realize the size and speed benefits of structured matrices on a broad array of real-world applications.
Structured linear maps such as the DFT, the Hadamard transform and convolution are a workhorse of machine learning, with diverse applications ranging from data preprocessing, random projection, featurization, to model compression.
For example, the DFT is a crucial step in the standard filter bank speech preprocessing pipeline (Jurafsky & Martin, 2014) .
Fast random projection and kernel approximation methods rely on the fast Hadamard transform (Le et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2016) and convolution (Yu et al., 2015) .
Large learnable classes of structured matrices such as Toeplitz-like matrices (Sindhwani et al., 2015) and low-displacement rank (LDR) matrices (Thomas et al., 2018) have been used for model compression.
However, despite their theoretical speedup, they lack efficient implementations, especially on GPUs.
Therefore their use has been confined to small models (e.g. single hidden layer neural nets) and small datasets (e.g. CIFAR-10).

assistant: text: We propose a differentiable family of "kaleidoscope matrices," prove that all structured matrices can be represented in this form, and use them to replace hand-crafted linear maps in deep learning models.