user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Learning Parsimonious Deep Feed-forward Networks

Paper content:
Convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks are designed with network structures well suited to the nature of spacial and sequential data respectively.
However, the structure of standard feed-forward neural networks (FNNs) is simply a stack of fully connected layers, regardless of the feature correlations in data.
In addition, the number of layers and the number of neurons are manually tuned on validation data, which is time-consuming and may lead to suboptimal networks.
In this paper, we propose an unsupervised structure learning method for learning parsimonious deep FNNs.
Our method determines the number of layers, the number of neurons at each layer, and the sparse connectivity between adjacent layers automatically from data.
The resulting models are called Backbone-Skippath Neural Networks (BSNNs).
Experiments on 17 tasks show that, in comparison with FNNs,  BSNNs can achieve better or comparable classification performance with much fewer parameters.
The interpretability of BSNNs is also shown to be better than that of FNNs.
Deep neural networks have made breakthroughs in all kinds of machine learning tasks BID13 BID22 , specifically with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for tasks with spacial data BID17 and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for tasks with sequential data .
One of the key reasons for the effectiveness of CNNs and RNNs is the well-designed network structures together with the parameter sharing schemes.
For example, in the convolution layers of CNNs, each neuron is connected to a local region in the input volume instead of all the input neurons.
Besides, the neurons in the same channel share the same set of weights.
This design utilizes the local and "stationary" properties of spacial data and consequently forms effective feature extractors.
In addition, it also prevents CNNs from having an exploding number of parameters when the networks become deeper and deeper.However, in practice, there are also many data which are neither spacial nor sequential, and hence the only applicable neural networks are the standard feed-forward neural networks (FNNs).
In contrast to CNN and RNN, FNN's network structure is simple.
It consists of multiple layers of neurons and each layer is fully connected to the next layer up, without considering any correlations in data or among neurons.
The network structure has two main shortcomings.
The first is that, there can be high connection redundancies.
As the number of layers and the number of neuron at each layer increase, the number of parameters increases quickly, which can cause severe overfitting.
The other shortcoming is that, ignoring all the correlations existing in data weakens the model's strength (as a feature extractor) and hurts the model's interpretability.We are interested in learning parsimonious deep feed-forward neural networks.
The goal is to learn FNNs which contain as few parameters as possible.
Parsimonious FNNs are desirable for several reasons.
Firstly, fewer parameters can ease overfitting.
Secondly, parsimonious FNNs require less storage and computation than FNNs, which makes it possible to be run on devices like mobile phones.
Lastly, parsimonious FNNs can have very flexible and different structures from each other depending on the specific tasks and data.
This would help the models fit the data well and also have good interpretability.
In general, it is desirable to solve a problem using the simplest model possible because it implies a good understanding of the problem.
connections (x − h 1 , h 1 − h 2 ) form the Backbone path.
The narrow fully-connected layers (x − h 3 , h 1 − h 3 , h 2 − h 3 ) are the Skip-paths.
The number of units at h 3 is relatively smaller than that at x, h 1 and h 2 .Learning
parsimonious FNNs is challenging mainly because we need to determine the sparse connectivity between layers. Network
pruning is a potential way to achieve this. However
, it requires to start from a network which is much larger than necessary for the task at hand. This can
cause a lot of computations wasted on those useless connections. In addition
, network pruning is not able to learn the number of units and number of layers.In this paper, we assume that data are generated by a sparse probabilistic model with multiple layers of latent variables, and view the feed-forward network to be built as a way to approximate the relationships between the observed variables and the top-level latent variables in the probabilistic model. The level
1 latent variables induce correlations among the observed variables. Therefore
, it is possible to determine them by analysing how the observed variables are correlated. Similarly
, by analysing how the level 1 latent variables are correlated, we can determine the level 2 latent variables, and so on. We empirically
show that our method can significantly reduce the number of parameters in FNNs, and the resulting model still achieves better or comparable results than FNNs in 17 classification tasks.
Structure learning for deep neural network is a challenging and interesting research problem.
We have proposed an unsupervised structure learning method which utilizes the correlation information in data for learning parsimonious deep feed-forward networks.
In comparison with standard FNN, although the resulting model of our method contains much fewer parameters, it achieves better or comparable classification performance in all kinds of tasks.
Our method is also shown to learn models with better interpretability, which is also an important problem in deep learning.
In the future, we will generalize our method to other networks like RNNs and CNNs.

assistant: text: An unsupervised structure learning method for Parsimonious Deep Feed-forward Networks.