user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Generating Differentially Private Datasets Using GANs

Paper content:
In this paper, we present a technique for generating artificial datasets that retain statistical properties of the real data while providing differential privacy guarantees with respect to this data.
We include a Gaussian noise layer in the discriminator of a generative adversarial network to make the output and the gradients differentially private with respect to the training data, and then use the generator component to synthesise privacy-preserving artificial dataset.
Our experiments show that under a reasonably small privacy budget we are able to generate data of high quality and successfully train machine learning models on this artificial data.
Following recent advancements in deep learning BID28 BID12 BID30 , more and more people and companies are interested in putting their data in use as they see that machine learning is able to generate a wide range of benefits, including financial, social, medical, security, and so on.
At the same time, however, such models are often able to capture a fine level of detail in training data potentially compromising privacy of individuals who's features sharply differ from others.
This problem is partially mitigated by the use of regularisation techniques that "smooth out" outstanding details and avoid overfitting, but it does not give any theoretical privacy guarantees.
Recent research by BID8 suggests that even without access to internal model parameters, by using hill climbing on output probabilities of a neural network, it is possible to recover (up to a certain degree) individual faces from a training set.The latter result is especially disturbing knowing that deep learning models are becoming an integral part of our lives, making its way to phones, smart watches, cars, and appliances.
And since these models are often trained on customers data, such training set recovery techniques will endanger privacy even without access to the manufacturer's servers where these models are being trained.In order to protect privacy while still benefiting from the use of statistics and machine learning, a number of techniques for data anonymisation has been developed over the years, including kanonymity BID29 , l-diversity BID18 , t-closeness BID17 , and differential privacy BID2 BID3 BID7 .
The latter has been recognised as a strong standard and is widely accepted by the research community.We study the task of publishing datasets in a differentially private manner.
In particular, we are interested in solving two problems.
First, we want to be able to benefit from the use of machine learning by third parties while protecting sensitive information of individuals in our dataset.
Second, we want to be sure that even if adversaries get access to the third-party model trained on our data, they would not be able to recover private information.
An additional challenge is to be able to publish an entire dataset, as opposed to being required to use a query interface like in a typical differentially private framework.In this paper, we propose a simple solution to this problem.
The main idea of our approach is to use generative adversarial networks (GANs) introduced in BID9 , trained with addition of Gaussian noise in the embedding space, to create artificial datasets that follow the same distribution as the real data while providing differential privacy guarantees.
This method has a number of advantages over the methods proposed earlier.
First of all, this solution is simple to implement, e.g. it does not require training ensembles of models on disjoint data.
Second, it can be done on a user side, and not on the side of the machine learning service provider, which eliminates the necessity of trusting this service provider or implementing privacy-preserving models locally.
Third, similarly to , privacy cannot be compromised even if the entire trained model is accessible to an adversary.Our contributions in this paper are the following:• we propose a novel mechanism for non-interactive differentially private data release, and to the best of our knowledge this is the first practical solution for complex real-world data; • we introduce a new technique of preserving privacy in neural networks via adding noise in the forward pass during training; • we show that this technique guarantees differential privacy for both the outputs and the learned weights of the network; • we demonstrate that we are able to achieve high accuracy in learning tasks while maintaining a reasonable (single-digit) privacy budget.The remainder of the paper is structured as follows.
In Section 2, we give an overview of related work.
Section 3 contains necessary background on differential privacy and generative adversarial networks.
In Section 4, we describe our approach and provide its theoretical analysis and some practical aspects.
Experimental results and implementation details are presented in Section 5, and Section 6 concludes the paper.
The theorem proofs and additional details can be found in the Appendix.
Using the experimental setup and implementation described above, we were able to get results close to BID23 although not quite matching their accuracy for the same privacy bounds on SVHN.
A performance gap is expected due to more generic nature of our method and a simpler privacy-preserving procedure.
Overall, we managed to achieve 98.19% accuracy on MNIST and 83.49% accuracy on SVHN while maintaining approximately (3.45, 10 −5 ) and (8, 10 −6 )-differential privacy.
These numbers, along with the corresponding results of BID23 , can be found in Table 1 .
It is also worth noting that we did not perform rigorous hyper-parameter tuning due to limited computational resources; even better accuracy could be achieved have we had done that.
Additionally, we trained a simple logistic regression model on MNIST, and obtained 88.96% accuracy on privately generated data compared to 92.58% on the original data, which confirms that any model can be used as a student.Examples of real and generated privacy-preserving images for MNIST and SVHN data are depicted on FIG2 .
It can be seen that generated images don't have the same contrast and dynamic range as real examples, which is not a problem in non-private GANs.
We attribute it to the lack of batch normalisation in the discriminator.In addition to quantitative analysis of test errors and privacy bounds, we perform visual inspection of generated examples and corresponding nearest neighbours in real data.
FIG3 depicts a set of generated private examples and their nearest real counterparts.
We observe that while some generated images are very close to real examples they don't match exactly, differing either in shape, colour or surrounding digits.
Moreover, a lot of pairs come from entirely different classes.
We investigate the problem of non-interactive private data release with differential privacy guarantees.
We employ generative adversarial networks to produce artificial privacy-preserving datasets.
Contrary to existing privacy protection work in deep learning, this method allows to publish sanitised data and train any non-private models on it.
The choice of GANs as a generative model ensures scalability and makes the technique suitable for real-world data with complex structure.
Moreover, this method does not require running privacy tests on generated data before releasing it.Additionally, we introduce a novel method for preserving privacy of training data specific to deep neural networks based on adding noise in the embedding space during forward pass.
It provides differential privacy guarantees and allows to construct privacy-preserving models in a simple and straightforward fashion, without modifying optimisation algorithms.In our experiments, we show that student models trained on artificial data can achieve high utility on MNIST dataset, while maintaining performance costs of added privacy and flexibility at acceptable levels on a more complicated SVHN data.
Adding privacy directly to the trained model still provides better accuracy, and therefore, one of the possible directions for future work is to improve the quality of generated data for given privacy bounds.
Extending presented technique and analysis to other types of deep neural networks provides another exciting opportunity for further research.

assistant: text: Train GANs with differential privacy to generate artificial privacy-preserving datasets.