user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Improving Sample-based Evaluation for Generative Adversarial Networks

Paper content:
In this paper, we propose an improved quantitative evaluation framework for Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) on generating domain-specific images, where we improve conventional evaluation methods on two levels: the feature representation and the evaluation metric.
Unlike most existing evaluation frameworks which transfer the representation of ImageNet inception model to map images onto the feature space, our framework uses a specialized encoder to acquire fine-grained domain-specific representation.
Moreover, for datasets with multiple classes, we propose Class-Aware Frechet Distance (CAFD), which employs a Gaussian mixture model on the feature space to better fit the multi-manifold feature distribution.
Experiments and analysis on both the feature level and the image level were conducted to demonstrate improvements of our proposed framework over the recently proposed state-of-the-art FID method.
To our best knowledge, we are the first to provide counter examples where FID gives inconsistent results with human judgments.
It is shown in the experiments that our framework is able to overcome the shortness of FID and improves robustness.
Code will be made available.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown outstanding abilities on many computer vision tasks including generating domain-specific images BID7 , style transfer , super resolution BID20 , etc.
The basic idea of GANs is to hold a two-player game between generator and discriminator, where the discriminator aims to distinguish between real and fake samples while the generator tries to generate samples as real as possible to fool the discriminator.Researchers have been continuously exploring better GAN architectures.
However, developing a widely-accepted GAN evaluation framework remains to be a challenging topic BID35 .
Due to a lack of GAN benchmark results, newly proposed GAN variants are validated on different evaluation frameworks and therefore incomparable.
Because human judgements are inherently limited by manpower resource, good quantitative evaluation frameworks are of very high importance to guide future research on designing, selecting, and interpreting GAN models.There have been varieties of efforts on designing sample-based evaluation for GANs on its ability of generating domain-specific images.
The goal is to measure the distance between the generated samples and the real in the dataset.
Most existing methods utilized the ImageNet BID29 inception model to map images onto the feature space.
The most widely used criteria is probably the Inception Score BID31 , which measures the distance via Kullback-Leiber Divergence (KLD).
However, it is probability based and is unable to report overfitting.
Recently, Frechet Inception Distance (FID) was proposed BID11 on improving Inception Score.
It directly measures Frechet Distance on the feature space with the Gaussian assumption.
It has been proved that FID is far better than Inception Score BID13 BID15 BID24 .
However, we argue that assuming normality on the whole feature distribution may lose class information on labeled datasets.In this work, we propose an improved quantitative sample-based evaluating criteria.
We improve conventional evaluation methods on two levels: the feature representation and the evaluation metric.Unlike most existing methods including the Inception Score BID31 and FID BID11 , our framework uses a specialized encoder trained on the dataset to get domain-specific representation.
We argue that applying the ImageNet model to either labeled or unlabeled datasets is ineffective.
Moreover, we propose Class-Aware Frechet Distance (CAFD) in our framework to measure the distribution distance of each class (mode) respectively on the feature space to include class information.
Instead of the single Gaussian assumption, we employ a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to better fit the feature distribution.
We also include KL divergence (KLD) between mode distribution of real data and generated samples into the framework to help detect mode dropping.Experiments and analysis on both the feature level and the image level were conducted to demonstrate the improved effectiveness of our proposed framework.
To our best knowledge, we are the first BID4 to provide counter examples where FID is inconsistent with human judgements (See FIG0 ).
It is shown in the experiments that our framework is able to overcome the shortness of existing methods.
Our method is sensitive to different representations.
Different selection of encoders can result in changes on the evaluation results.
Experiments in Section 5.1 demonstrate that the ImageNet inception model will give misleading results (See FIG0 .
Thus, a domain-specific encoder should be used in each evaluation pipeline.
Because the representation is not fixed, the correct use (with
In this paper, we aimed to tackle the very important problem of evaluating the Generative Adversarial Networks.
We presented an improved sample-based evaluation, which improves conventional methods on both representation and evaluation metric.
We argue that a domain-specific encoder is needed and propose Class-Aware Frechet Distance to better fit the feature distribution.
To our best knowledge, we are the first to provide counter examples where the state-of-the-art FID method is inconsistent with human judgements.
Experiments and analysis on both the feature level and the image level have shown that our framework is more effective.
Therefore, the encoder should be specifically trained for datasets of which the labels are different from ImageNet.
To attain effective representations on non-ImageNet datasets, we need to ensure that the class labels of data used for training GAN models are consistent with those of data used for training the encoder.

assistant: text: This paper improves existing sample-based evaluation for GANs and contains some insightful experiments.