user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Perception-Driven Curiosity with Bayesian Surprise

Paper content:
Intrinsic rewards in reinforcement learning provide a powerful algorithmic capability for agents to learn how to interact with their environment in a task-generic way.
However, increased incentives for motivation can come at the cost of increased fragility to stochasticity.
We introduce a method for computing an intrinsic reward for curiosity using metrics derived from sampling a latent variable model used to estimate dynamics.
Ultimately, an estimate of the conditional probability of observed states is used as our intrinsic reward for curiosity.
In our experiments, a video game agent uses our model to autonomously learn how to play Atari games using our curiosity reward in combination with extrinsic rewards from the game to achieve improved performance on games with sparse extrinsic rewards.
When stochasticity is introduced in the environment, our method still demonstrates improved performance over the baseline.
Methods encouraging agents to explore their environment by rewarding actions that yield unexpected results are commonly referred to as curiosity (Schmidhuber (1991; 1990a; b) ).
Using curiosity as an exploration policy in reinforcement learning has many benefits.
In scenarios in which extrinsic rewards are sparse, combining extrinsic and intrinsic curiosity rewards gives a framework for agents to discover how to gain extrinsic rewards .
In addition, when agents explore, they can build more robust policies for their environment even if extrinsic rewards are readily available (Forestier & Oudeyer, 2015) .
These policies learned through exploration can give an agent a more general understanding of the results of their actions so that the agent will have a greater ability to adapt using their existing policy if their environment changes.
Despite these benefits, novelty-driven exploration methods can be distracted by randomness.
(Schmidhuber, 1990b; Storck et al., 1995)
When stochastic elements are introduced in the environment, agents may try to overfit to noise instead of learning a deterministic model of the effect of their own actions on their world.
In particular, Burda et al. (2018a) showed that when a TV with white noise is added to an environment in which an agent is using the intrinsic curiosity module (ICM) developed by Pathak et al. (2017) , the agent stops exploring the environment and just moves back and forth in front of the TV.
In this paper, we present a new method for agent curiosity which provides robust performance in sparse reward environments and under stochasticity.
We use a conditional variational autoencoder (Sohn et al., 2015) to develop a model of our environment.
We choose to develop a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) due to the success of this architecture in modeling dynamics shown in the video prediction literature (Denton & Fergus, 2018; Xue et al., 2018) .
We incorporate additional modeling techniques to regularize for stochastic dynamics in our perception model.
We compute our intrinsic reward for curiosity by sampling from the latent space of the CVAE and computing an associated conditional probability which is a more robust metric than the commonly used pixel-level reconstruction error.
The primary contributions of our work are the following.
1. Perception-driven approach to curiosity.
We develop a perception model which integrates model characteristics proven to work well for deep reinforcement learning with recent architectures for estimating dynamics from pixels.
This combination retains robust-ness guarantees from existing deep reinforcement learning models while improving the ability to capture complex visual dynamics.
2. Bayesian metric for surprise.
We use the entropy of the current state given the last state as a measurement for computing surprise.
This Bayesian approach will down-weight stochastic elements of the environment when learning a model of dynamics.
As a result, this formulation is robust to noise.
For our experiments, autonomous agents use our model to learn how to play Atari games.
We measure the effectiveness of our surprise metric as a meaningful intrinsic reward by tracking the total achieved extrinsic reward by agents using a combination of our intrinsic reward with extrinsic rewards to learn.
We show that the policy learned by a reinforcement learning algorithm using our surprise metric outperforms the policies learned by alternate reward schemes.
Furthermore, we introduce stochasticity into the realization of actions in the environment, and we show that our method still demonstrates successful performance beyond that of the baseline method.
In summary, we presented a novel method to compute curiosity through the use of a meaningfully constructed model for perception.
We used a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) to learn scene dynamics from image and action sequences and computed an intrinsic reward for curiosity via a conditional probability derived from importance sampling from the latent space of our CVAE.
In our experiments, we demonstrated that our approach allows agents to learn to accomplish tasks more effectively in environments with sparse extrinsic rewards without compromising robustness to stochasticity.
We show robustness to stochasticity in our action space which we support through the actionprediction network used in our perception model.
However, robustness to stochasticity in scenes is a separate challenge which the method we use as our baseline, ICM, cannot handle well.
(Burda et al., 2018a)
Stochasticity in scenes occurs when there are significant changes between sequential image frames which are random with respect to agent actions.
We hypothesize that this stochasticity requires a different approach to handle.
A consideration in comparing models for curiosity and exploration in deep reinforcement learning is that typically both the dynamics model and intrinsic reward metric are constructed and compared as unit as we did in this paper.
However, a conditional probability estimation could be derived the dynamics model given by ICM just as reconstruction error could be used as intrinsic reward from our CVAE.
Alternately, other metrics measuring novelty and learning such as the KL divergence between sequential latent distributions in our model have been proposed in a general manner by Schmidhuber (2010) .
An interesting direction for future work would be to explore the impact of intrinsic reward metrics for curiosity on robustness to stochasticity in scenes independent across different choices of dynamics model.

assistant: text: We introduce a method for computing an intrinsic reward for curiosity using metrics derived from sampling a latent variable model used to estimate dynamics.