user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Zero-Shot Policy Transfer with Disentangled Attention

Paper content:
Domain adaptation is an open problem in deep reinforcement learning (RL).
Often, agents are asked to perform in environments where data is difficult to obtain.
In such settings, agents are trained in similar environments, such as simulators, and are then transferred to the original environment.
The gap between visual observations of the source and target environments often causes the agent to fail in the target environment.
We present a new RL agent, SADALA (Soft Attention DisentAngled representation Learning Agent).
SADALA first learns a compressed state representation.
It then jointly learns to ignore distracting features and solve the task presented.
SADALA's separation of important and unimportant visual features leads to robust domain transfer.
SADALA outperforms both prior disentangled-representation based RL and domain randomization approaches across RL environments (Visual Cartpole and DeepMind Lab).
RL agents learn to maximize rewards within a task by taking actions based on observations.
The advent of deep learning has enabled RL agents to learn in high dimensional feature spaces and complex action spaces (Krizhevsky et al., 2012; Mnih et al., 2016) .
Deep RL methods have beat human performance in a variety of tasks, such as Go (Silver & Hassabis, 2016) .
However, deep RL has two crippling drawbacks: high sample complexity and specificity to training task.
There are many domains where data collection is expensive and time consuming, such as healthcare, autonomous vehicles, and robotics (Gottesman et al., 2019; Barrett et al., 2010) .
Thus, agents are often trained in simulation and must transfer the resulting knowledge to reality.
While this solves the issue of sample complexity, reality and simulated domains are sufficiently different that it is infeasible to naively train a deep RL agent in a simulation and transfer.
This is known as the reality gap (Sadeghi & Levine, 2016) .
Jumping the reality gap is difficult for two orthogonal reasons.
The first is that dynamics of a simulation are an approximation to the dynamics of the real world.
Prior work has shown success in transfer between domains with different dynamics (Killian et al., 2017; Yao et al., 2018; Doshi-Velez & Konidaris, 2016) .
In this paper, we address the second difficulty: the difference in visual observations of states.
Due to limitations in current photorealistic rendering, simulation and the real world are effectively two different visual domains (Sadeghi & Levine, 2016 ).
We present a method of robust transfer between visual RL domains, using attention and a β variational autoencoder to automatically learn a state representation sufficient to solve both source and target domains.
By learning disetangled and relevant state representation, our approach does not require target domain samples when training.
The state representation enables the RL agent to attend to only the relevant state information and ignore all other, potentially distracting information.
We test the SADALA framework on two transfer learning tasks, using A3C as the deep RL algorithm.
The first task is Visual Cartpole.
This domain is the same as Cartpole-v1 in OpenAI Gym with two key differences (Brockman et al., 2016) .
The observed state is now the pixel rendering of the cartpole as well as the velocities of the cart and pole.
Thus, the agent must learn to predict the position of the cart and pole from the rendering.
Additionally, we modify this domain to include a transfer task.
The agent must learn to transfer its knowledge of the game across different color configurations for the cart, pole, and track.
Thus, Visual Cartpole is defined as a family of MDPs M where the true state S z is the positions and velocities of the cart and pole and the observed state S U = G U (S z ) for an MDP U ∈ M is the pixel observations and velocity values.
Optimally, the agent should learn to ignore the factors in extracted latent state factorsŜ z that correspond to color, as they do not aid the agent in balancing the pole.
This task tests the agent's ability to ignore irrelevant latent state factors.
The second task is the "Collect Good Objects" task from Deepmind Lab (Beattie et al., 2016) .
The agent must learn to navigate in first person and pick up "good" objects while avoiding "bad" objects.
This task is defined as a family of MDPs M where the true state S z contains the position of the agent, the position of good and bad objects, the type of good and bad objects, and the color of the walls and floor.
In a single MDP U ∈ M , all good objects are hats or all good objects are balloons.
Similarly, all bad objects are either cans or cakes.
The walls and floor can either take a green and orange colorscheme or a red and blue colorscheme.
The agent is trained on hats/cans with the green/orange colorscheme and balloons/cakes with both colorschemes.
It is then tested on hats/cans with the red/blue colorscheme.
Optimally, the agent should learn to ignore the color of the floor and walls.
Additionally, it should use the type of object to determine if it is good or bad.
This task tests the agent's ability to ignore distracting latent state factors (the color of the walls and floor) while attending to relevant factors (the positions and types of objects and its own position).
To test the results of the SADALA algorithm, we first test the reconstruction and disentanglement properties of the β-VAE used in the state representation stage.
Note that this stage is identical to that of DARLA (Higgins et al., 2017) .
As such, we expect the disentanglement properties to be similar.
See figure 3 for reconstructions of the cartpole state.
Based on the reconstructions, it is apparent that the β-VAE has learned to represent cart position and pole angle.
Though the angle of the poles is slightly incorrect in the first set of images, the pole is tilted in the correct direction, yielding sufficiently correct extracted latent state factors.
Additionally, the color of the cart, pole, and background is incorrect in the third pair of images.
While this demonstrates that the identification and reconstructions of colors is not infallible, the position of the cart and pole remains correct, yielding a set of extracted latent state parameters that is sufficient to solve the MDP.
See figure 5 for a visualization of reconstruction with attention.
In the original image, the pole is standing straight and the cart is centered.
In the reconstruction, the cart is centered, and the pole is almost upright.
However, the reconstruction does not include the colors of the cart or pole.
Instead it fills the cart and pole with the mean color of the dataset.
This shows that the attention weights are properly learning to ignore color and instead pay attention to the position of the cart and pole.
Figures 6 and 7 gives a comparison of the performance of the algorithms across environments.
Note that all of the algorithms are sufficient at solving the source task, with the single-task learner performing slightly better.
This is due to the fact that the single-task learner can optimize its con- The single-task learner achieves better rewards on all source tasks than any of the transfer-specific agents.
Domain randomization performs less well because of the complexity of the domain randomization task.
Rather than optimizing reward for a single domain, the agent must optimize reward across a large set of domains.
DARLA, SADALA, and SADALA with reduced variance also perform less well on the source task than the baseline agent.
This is due to imperfections in the β-VAE.
Though the β-VAE attempts to reconstruct the input image, it does not do so perfectly, as shown in figure 3 .
This shows that its extraction of latent state features is not perfect, leading to potentially confusing states given to the RL agent.
Additionally, while the β-VAE's goal is to learn a disentangled representation, it does not do so perfectly.
As such, (partially) entangled latent state factors may further confuse the RL agent.
The single-task learner fails to transfer its policy to the target domain.
DARLA transfers some of its knowledge to the target domain.
Domain randomization also transfers some knowledge.
Finally, SADALA transfers more of its knowledge.
The single-task agent has no incentive to learn a factored state representation that enables transfer.
Its convolutional filters will directly optimize to maximize reward in the source policy.
Thus, if the filters are searching for a hat on a blue floor but tested on a hat on a red floor the convolutional filters will fail to transfer.
DARLA learns a state representation that is mostly disentangled.
This allows the RL agent to learn to ignore unimportant features such as cart color and utilize important features such as cart position.
The factored state representation forces the RL agent to learn a more robust policy.
However, the neural network parameterization of the RL policy must implicitly learn to ignore unimportant factors.
Therefore, when presented with unseen information, the RL agent may not properly ignore unimportant factors.
Domain randomization forces the neural network to implicitly learn a state representation sufficient to transfer between tasks.
This requires large amounts of training data and is less robust than explicit modeling of latent state factors.
SADALA builds on DARLA by adding an explicit attention mechanism, allowing it to more effectively ignore unimportant features.
Due to the use of the sigmoid activation in the attention mechanism, the attention weights W are bounded between 0 and 1.
In addition to providing a direct weight on the importance of a feature, this bound prevents high variance of attention weights across different inputs.
SADALA with the variance reduction term performs worse than both DARLA and SADALA without variance reduction on the Deepmind lab task but better on the other two.
In the scenario where the extracted latent state factors from the β-VAE are perfectly disentangled, static attention weights should be sufficient to solve the source task and should transfer better to the target task, as in the Visual Cartpole task.
However, the β-VAE does not output perfectly disentangled factors, especially in more complex visual domains such as the Deepmind lab.
Thus, the amount of attention paid to each feature from the β-VAE may differ across tasks, violating the assumption that attention weights should be zero variance.
In this paper we propose SADALA, a three stage method for zero-shot domain transfer.
First, SADALA learns a feature extractor that represents input states (images) as disentangled factors.
It then filters these latent factors using an attention mechanism to select those most important to solving a source task.
Jointly, it learns a policy for the source task that is robust to changes in states, and is able to transfer to related target tasks.
We validate the performance of SADALA on both a high-dimensional continuous-control problem (Visual Cartpole) and a 3D naturalistic first-person simulated environments (Deepmind Lab).
We show that the attention mechanism introduced is able to differentiate between important and unimportant latent features, enabling robust transfer.
are constrained to be outside of a hypersphere of radius 0.1 the test environment.
When evaluating source domain performance, the agents trained on multiple source domains are all evaluated on the same domain, randomly sampled from the set of source domains.
The single task learner is evaluated on the source domain it is trained on.

assistant: text: We present an agent that uses a beta-vae to extract visual features and an attention mechanism to ignore irrelevant features from visual observations to enable robust transfer between visual domains.