user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Learning Awareness Models

Paper content:
We consider the setting of an agent with a fixed body interacting with an unknown and uncertain external world.
We show that models trained to predict proprioceptive information about the agent's body come to represent objects in the external world.
In spite of being trained with only internally available signals, these dynamic body models come to represent external objects through the necessity of predicting their effects on the agent's own body.
That is, the model learns holistic persistent representations of objects in the world, even though the only training signals are body signals.
Our dynamics model is able to successfully predict distributions over 132 sensor readings over 100 steps into the future and we demonstrate that even when the body is no longer in contact with an object, the latent variables of the dynamics model continue to represent its shape.
We show that active data collection by maximizing the entropy of predictions about the body---touch sensors, proprioception and vestibular information---leads to learning of dynamic models that show superior performance when used for control.
We also collect data from a real robotic hand and show that the same models can be used to answer questions about properties of objects in the real world.
Videos with qualitative results of our models are available at https://goo.gl/mZuqAV.
Situation awareness is the perception of the elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, and the comprehension of their meaning, and the projection of their status in the near future.
-Endsley (1987) As artificial intelligence moves off of the server and out into the world at large; be this the virtual world, in the form of simulated walkers, climbers and other creatures BID26 , or the real world in the form of virtual assistants, self driving vehicles BID6 , and household robots BID29 ; we are increasingly faced with the need to build systems that understand and reason about the world around them.When building systems like this it is natural to think of the physical world as breaking into two parts.
The first part is the platform, the part we design and build, and therefore know quite a lot about; and the second part is everything else, which comprises all the strange and exciting situations that the platform might encounter.
As designers, we have very little control over the external part of the world, and the variety of situations that might arise are too numerous to anticipate in advance.
Additionally, while the state of the platform is readily accessible (e.g. through deployment of integrated sensors), the state of the external world is generally not available to the system.
The platform hosts any sensors and actuators that are part of the system, and importantly it can be relied on to be the same across the wide variety situations where the system might be deployed.
A virtual assistant can rely on having access to the camera and microphone on your smart phone, and the control system for a self driving car can assume it is controlling a specific make and model of vehicle, and that it has access to any specialized hardware installed by the manufacturer.
These consistency assumptions hold regardless of what is happening in the external world.This same partitioning of the world occurs naturally for living creatures as well.
As a human being your platform is your body; it maintains a constant size and shape throughout your life (or at least Figure 1 : Illustration of a preprogrammed grasp and release cycle of a single episode of the MPL hand. The target block is only perceivable to the agent through the constraints it imposes on the movement of the hand. Note that the shape of the object is correctly predicted even when the hand is not in contact with it. That is, the hand neural network sensory model has learned persistent representations of the external world, which enable it to be aware of object properties even when not touching the objects.these change vastly slower than the world around you), and you can hopefully rely on the fact that no matter what demands tomorrow might make of you, you will face them with the same number of fingers and toes.This story of partitioning the world into the self and the other, that exchange information through the body, suggests an approach to building models for reasoning about the world.
If the body is a consistent vehicle through which an agent interacts with the world and proprioceptive and tactile senses live at the boundary of the body, then predictive models of these senses should result in models that represent external objects, in order to accurately predict their future effects on the body.
This is the approach we take in this paper.We consider two robotic hand bodies, one in simulation and one in reality.
The hands are induced to grasp a variety of target objects (see Figure 1 for an example) and we build forward models of their proprioceptive signals.
The target objects are perceivable only through the constraints they place on the movement of the body, and we show that this information is sufficient for the dynamics models to form holistic, persistent representations of the targets.
We also show that we can use the learned dynamics models for planning, and that we can illicit behaviors from the planner that depend on external objects, in spite of those objects not being included in the observations directly (see Figure 7 ).Our
simulated body is a model of the hand of the Johns Hopkins Modular Prosthetic Limb BID30 , realized in MuJoCo BID58 . The
model is actuated by 13 motors each capable of exerting a bidirectional force on a single joint. The
model is also instrumented with a series of sensors measuring angles and torques of the joints, as well as pressure sensors measuring contact forces at several locations across its surface. There
are also inertial measurement units located at the end of each finger which measure translational and rotational accelerations. In total
there are 132 sensor measurements whose values we predict using our dynamics model. Our real
body is the Shadow Dexterous Hand, which is a real robotic hand with 20 degree of freedom control. This allows
us to show that that our ideas apply not only in simulation, but succeed in the real world as well. The Shadow
Hand is instrumented with sensors measuring the tension of the tendons driving the fingers, and also has pressure sensors on the pad of each fingertip that measure contact forces with objects in the world. We apply the
same techniques used on the simulated model to data collected from this real platform and use the resulting model to make predictions about states of external objects in the real world.
In this paper we showed that learning a forward predictive model of proprioception we obtain models that can be used to answer questions and reason about objects in the external world.
We demonstrated this in simulation with a series of diagnostic tasks where we use the model features to identify properties of external objects, and also with a control task where we show that we can plan in the model to achieve objectives that were not seen during training.We also showed that the same principles we applied to our simulated models are also successful in reality.
We collected data from a real robotic platform and used the same modelling techniques to predict the orientation of a grasped block.A DERIVING THE RÉNYI ENTROPY OF A MIXTURE OF GAUSSIANS DISPLAYFORM0 where the last step can be computed with Mathematica, and is also given in Bromiley (2003) : DISPLAYFORM1

assistant: text: We train predictive models on proprioceptive information and show they represent properties of external objects.