user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Towards A Unified Min-Max Framework for Adversarial Exploration and Robustness

Paper content:
The worst-case training principle that minimizes the maximal adversarial loss, also known as adversarial training (AT), has shown to be a state-of-the-art approach for enhancing adversarial robustness against norm-ball bounded input perturbations.
Nonetheless, min-max optimization beyond the purpose of AT has not been rigorously explored in the research of adversarial attack and defense.
In particular, given a set of risk sources (domains), minimizing the maximal loss induced from the domain set can be reformulated as a general min-max problem that is different from AT.
Examples of this general formulation include attacking model ensembles, devising universal perturbation under multiple inputs or data transformations, and generalized AT over different types of attack models.
We show that these problems can be solved under a unified and theoretically principled min-max optimization framework.
We also show that the self-adjusted domain weights learned from our method provides a means to explain the difficulty level of attack and defense over multiple domains.
Extensive experiments show that our approach leads to substantial performance improvement over the conventional averaging strategy.
Training a machine learning model that is capable of assuring its worst-case performance against all possible adversaries given a specified threat model is a fundamental yet challenging problem, especially for deep neural networks (DNNs) (Szegedy et al., 2013; Goodfellow et al., 2015; Carlini & Wagner, 2017) .
A common practice to train an adversarially robust model is based on a specific form of min-max training, known as adversarial training (AT) (Goodfellow et al., 2015; Madry et al., 2017) , where the minimization step learns model weights under the adversarial loss constructed at the maximization step in an alternative training fashion.
On datasets such as MNIST and CIFAR-10, AT has achieved the state-of-the-art defense performance against p -norm-ball input perturbations (Athalye et al., 2018b) .
Motivated by the success of AT, one follow-up question that naturally arises is: Beyond AT, can other types of min-max formulation and optimization techniques advance the research in adversarial robustness?
In this paper, we give an affirmative answer corroborated by the substantial performance gain and the ability of self-learned risk interpretation using our proposed min-max framework on several tasks for adversarial attack and defense.
We demonstrate the utility of a general formulation for min-max optimization minimizing the maximal loss induced from a set of risk sources (domains).
Our considered min-max formulation is fundamentally different from AT, as our maximization step is taken over the probability simplex of the set of domains.
Moreover, we show that many problem setups in adversarial attacks and defenses can in fact be reformulated under this general min-max framework, including attacking model ensembles (Tramèr et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018) , devising universal perturbation to input samples (Moosavi-Dezfooli et al., 2017) or data transformations (Athalye & Sutskever, 2018; Brown et al., 2017) , and generalized AT over multiple types of threat models (Tramèr & Boneh, 2019; Araujo et al., 2019 ).
However, current methods for solving these tasks often rely on simple heuristics (e.g.,
In this paper, we propose a general min-max framework applicable to both adversarial attack and defense settings.
We show that many problem setups can be re-formulated under this general framework.
Extensive experiments show that proposed algorithms lead to significant improvement on multiple attack and defense tasks compared with previous state-of-the-art approaches.
In particular, we obtain 17.48%, 35.21% and 9.39% improvement on attacking model ensembles, devising universal perturbation to input samples, and data transformations under CIFAR-10, respectively.
Our minmax scheme also generalizes adversarial training (AT) for multiple types of adversarial attacks, attaining faster convergence and better robustness compared to the vanilla AT and the average strategy.
Moreover, our approach provides a holistic tool for self-risk assessment by learning domain weights.
where w ∈ R K represent domain weights, and P has been defined in (1).

assistant: text: A unified min-max optimization framework for adversarial attack and defense