user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Ada-Boundary: Accelerating the DNN Training via Adaptive Boundary Batch Selection

Paper content:
Neural networks can converge faster with help from a smarter batch selection strategy.
In this regard, we propose Ada-Boundary, a novel adaptive-batch selection algorithm that constructs an effective mini-batch according to the learning progress of the model.Our key idea is to present confusing samples what the true label is.
Thus, the samples near the current decision boundary are considered as the most effective to expedite convergence.
Taking advantage of our design, Ada-Boundary maintains its dominance in various degrees of training difficulty.
We demonstrate the advantage of Ada-Boundary by extensive experiments using two convolutional neural networks for three benchmark data sets.
The experiment results show that Ada-Boundary improves the training time by up to 31.7% compared with the state-of-the-art strategy and by up to 33.5% compared with the baseline strategy.
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable performance in many fields, especially, in computer vision and natural language processing BID13 BID5 .
Nevertheless, as the size of data grows very rapidly, the training step via stochastic gradient descent (SGD) based on mini-batches suffers from extremely high computational cost, which is mainly due to slow convergence.
The common approaches for expediting convergence include some SGD variants BID28 BID11 that maintain individual learning rates for parameters and batch normalization BID9 that stabilizes gradient variance.Recently, in favor of the fact that not all samples have an equal impact on training, many studies have attempted to design sampling schemes based on the sample importance BID25 BID3 (1) at the training accuracy of 60%.
An easy data set (MNIST) does not have "too hard" sample but "moderately hard" samples colored in gray, whereas a relatively hard data set (CIFAR-10) has many "too hard" samples colored in black.
(b) shows the result of SGD on a hard batch.
The moderately hard samples are informative to update a model, but the too hard samples make the model overfit to themselves.
et al., 2017; BID10 .
Curriculum learning BID0 ) inspired by human's learning is one of the representative methods to speed up the training step by gradually increasing the difficulty level of training samples.
In contrast, deep learning studies focus on giving higher weights to harder samples during the entire training process.
When the model requires a lot of epochs for convergence, it is known to converge faster with the batches of hard samples rather than randomly selected batches BID21 BID17 BID4 .
There are various criteria for judging the hardness of a sample, e.g., the rank of the loss computed from previous epochs BID17 .Here
, a natural question arises: Does the "hard" batch selection always speed up DNN training? Our
answer is partially yes: it is helpful only when training an easy data set. According
to our indepth analysis, as demonstrated in FIG1 (a), the
hardest samples in a hard data set (e.g., CIFAR-10) were too hard to learn. They are
highly likely to make the decision boundary bias towards themselves, as shown in FIG1 (b) . On
the other
hand, in an easy data set (e.g., MNIST), the hardest samples, though they are just moderately hard, provide useful information for training. In practice,
it was reported that hard batch selection succeeded to speed up only when training the easy MNIST data set BID17 BID4 , and our experiments in Section 4.4 also confirmed the previous findings. This limitation
calls for a new sampling scheme that supports both easy and hard data sets.In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive batch selection strategy, called Ada-Boundary, that accelerates training and is better generalized to hard data sets. As opposed to existing
hard batch selection, Ada-Boundary picks up the samples with the most appropriate difficulty, considering the learning progress of the model. The samples near the current
decision boundary are selected with high probability, as shown in FIG3 (a). Intuitively speaking, the
samples
far from the decision boundary are not that helpful since they are either too hard or too easy: those on the incorrect (or correct) side are too hard (or easy). This is the reason why we regard
the samples around the decision boundary, which are moderately hard, as having the appropriate difficulty at the moment. Overall, the key idea of Ada-Boundary
is to use the distance of a sample to the decision boundary for the hardness of the sample. The beauty of this design is not to require
human intervention. The current decision boundary should be directly
influenced by the learning progress of the model. The decision boundary of a DNN moves towards eliminating
the incorrect samples as the training step progresses, so the difficulty of the samples near the decision boundary gradually increases as the model is learned. Then, the decision boundary keeps updated to identify the
confusing samples in the middle of SGD, as illustrated in FIG3 (b) . This approach is able to accelerate the convergence
speed
by providing the samples suited to the model at every SGD iteration, while it is less prone to incur an overfitting issue.We have conducted extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority of Ada-Boundary. Two popular convolutional neural network (CNN) 1 models are
trained using three benchmark data sets. Compared to random batch selection, Ada-Boundary significantly
reduces the execution time by 14.0-33.5%. At the same time, it provides a relative improvement of test error
by 7.34-14.8% in the final epoch. Moreover, compared to the state-of-the-art hard batch selection BID17
, Ada-Boundary achieves the execution time smaller by 18.0% and the test error smaller by 13.7% in the CIFAR-10 data set.2 Ada-Boundary COMPONENTS The main challenge for Ada-Boundary is to evaluate
how close a sample is to the decision boundary. In this section, we introduce a novel distance measure and present a method
of computing the sampling probability based on the measure.
In this paper, we proposed a novel adaptive batch selection algorithm, Ada-Boundary, that presents the most appropriate samples according to the learning progress of the model.
Toward this goal, we defined the distance from a sample to the decision boundary and introduced a quantization method for selecting the samples near the boundary with high probability.
We performed extensive experiments using two CNN models for three benchmark data sets.
The results showed that Ada-Boundary significantly accelerated the training process as well as was better generalized in hard data sets.
When training an easy data set, Ada-Boundary showed a fast convergence comparable to that of the state-of-the-art algorithm; when training relatively hard data sets, only Ada-Boundary converged significantly faster than random batch selection.The most exciting benefit of Ada-Boundary is to save the time needed for the training of a DNN.
It becomes more important as the size and complexity of data becomes higher, and can be boosted with recent advance of hardware technologies.
Our immediate future work is to apply Ada-Boundary to other types of DNNs such as the recurrent neural networks (RNN) BID18 and the long short-term memory (LSTM) BID7 , which have a neural structure completely different from the CNN.
In addition, we plan to investigate the relationship between the power of a DNN and the improvement of Ada-Boundary.

assistant: text: We suggest a smart batch selection technique called Ada-Boundary.