user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Size

Paper content:
It is common practice to decay the learning rate.
Here we show one can usually obtain the same learning curve on both training and test sets by instead increasing the batch size during training.
This procedure is successful for stochastic gradient descent (SGD), SGD with momentum, Nesterov momentum, and Adam.
It reaches equivalent test accuracies after the same number of training epochs, but with fewer parameter updates, leading to greater parallelism and shorter training times.
We can further reduce the number of parameter updates by increasing the learning rate $\epsilon$ and scaling the batch size $B \propto \epsilon$.
Finally, one can increase the momentum coefficient $m$ and scale $B \propto 1/(1-m)$, although this tends to slightly reduce the test accuracy.
Crucially, our techniques allow us to repurpose existing training schedules for large batch training with no hyper-parameter tuning.
We train ResNet-50 on ImageNet to 76.1% validation accuracy in under 30 minutes.
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) remains the dominant optimization algorithm of deep learning.
However while SGD finds minima that generalize well BID30 BID26 , each parameter update only takes a small step towards the objective.
Increasing interest has focused on large batch training BID8 BID10 BID27 , in an attempt to increase the step size and reduce the number of parameter updates required to train a model.
Large batches can be parallelized across many machines, reducing training time.
Unfortunately, when we increase the batch size the test set accuracy often falls BID12 BID8 .To
understand this surprising observation, BID23 argued one should interpret SGD as integrating a stochastic differential equation. They
showed that the scale of random fluctuations in the SGD dynamics, g = ( N B − 1), where is the learning rate, N training set size and B batch size. Furthermore
, they found that there is an optimum fluctuation scale g which maximizes the test set accuracy (at constant learning rate), and this introduces an optimal batch size proportional to the learning rate when B N . BID8 already
observed this scaling rule empirically and exploited it to train ResNet-50 to 76.3% ImageNet validation accuracy in one hour. Here we show,•
When one decays the learning rate, one simultaneously decays the scale of random fluctuations g in the SGD dynamics. Decaying the learning
rate is simulated annealing. We propose an alternative
procedure; instead of decaying the learning rate, we increase the batch size during training. This strategy achieves near-identical
model performance on the test set with the same number of training epochs but significantly fewer parameter updates. Our proposal does not require any fine-tuning
as we follow pre-existing training schedules; when the learning rate drops by a factor of α, we instead increase the batch size by α.• As shown previously, we can further reduce the
number of parameter updates by increasing the learning rate and scaling B ∝ . One can also increase the momentum coefficient and
scale B ∝ 1/(1 − m), although this slightly reduces the test accuracy. We train InceptionResNet-V2 on ImageNet in under 2500
parameter updates, using batches of 65536 images, and reach a validation set accuracy of 77%. We also replicate the setup of BID8 on TPU and train
ResNet-50 on ImageNet to 76.1% accuracy in under 30 minutes.We note that a number of recent works have discussed increasing the batch size during training BID7 BID3 BID1 BID2 BID5 , but to our knowledge no paper has shown empirically that increasing the batch size and decaying the learning rate are quantitatively equivalent. A key contribution of our work is to demonstrate that
decaying learning rate schedules can be directly converted into increasing batch size schedules, and vice versa; providing a straightforward pathway towards large batch training.In section 2 we discuss the convergence criteria for SGD in strongly convex minima, in section 3 we interpret decaying learning rates as simulated annealing, and in section 4 we discuss the difficulties of training with large momentum coefficients. Finally in section 5 we present conclusive experimental
evidence that the empirical benefits of decaying learning rates in deep learning can be obtained by instead increasing the batch size during training. We exploit this observation and other tricks to achieve
efficient large batch training on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet.
We can often achieve the benefits of decaying the learning rate by instead increasing the batch size during training.
We support this claim with experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, and with a range of optimizers including SGD, Momentum and Adam.
Our findings enable the efficient use of vast batch sizes, significantly reducing the number of parameter updates required to train a model.
This has the potential to dramatically reduce model training times.
We further increase the batch size B by increasing the learning rate and momentum parameter m, while scaling B ∝ /(1 − m).
Combining these strategies, we train Inception-ResNet-V2 on ImageNet to 77% validation accuracy in under 2500 parameter updates, using batches of 65536 images.
We also exploit increasing batch sizes to train ResNet-50 to 76.1% ImageNet validation set accuracy on TPU in under 30 minutes.
Most strikingly, we achieve this without any hyper-parameter tuning, since our scaling rules enable us to directly convert existing hyper-parameter choices from the literature for large batch training.

assistant: text: Decaying the learning rate and increasing the batch size during training are equivalent.