user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Capsules with Inverted Dot-Product Attention Routing

Paper content:
We introduce a new routing algorithm for capsule networks, in which a child capsule is routed to a parent based only on agreement between the parent's state and the child's vote.
Unlike previously proposed routing algorithms, the parent's ability to reconstruct the child is not explicitly taken into account to update the routing probabilities.
This simplifies the routing procedure and improves performance on benchmark datasets such as CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100.
The new mechanism 1) designs routing via inverted dot-product attention; 2) imposes Layer Normalization as normalization; and 3) replaces sequential iterative routing with concurrent iterative routing.
Besides outperforming existing capsule networks, our model performs at-par with a powerful CNN (ResNet-18), using less than 25% of the parameters.
On a different task of recognizing digits from overlayed digit images, the proposed capsule model performs favorably against CNNs given the same number of layers and neurons per layer.
We believe that our work raises the possibility of applying capsule networks to complex real-world tasks.
Capsule Networks (CapsNets) represent visual features using groups of neurons.
Each group (called a "capsule") encodes a feature and represents one visual entity.
Grouping all the information about one entity into one computational unit makes it easy to incorporate priors such as "a part can belong to only one whole" by routing the entire part capsule to its parent whole capsule.
Routing is mutually exclusive among parents, which ensures that one part cannot belong to multiple parents.
Therefore, capsule routing has the potential to produce an interpretable hierarchical parsing of a visual scene.
Such a structure is hard to impose in a typical convolutional neural network (CNN).
This hierarchical relationship modeling has spurred a lot of interest in designing capsules and their routing algorithms (Sabour et al., 2017; Hinton et al., 2018; Wang & Liu, 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018; Rajasegaran et al., 2019; .
In order to do routing, each lower-level capsule votes for the state of each higher-level capsule.
The higher-level (parent) capsule aggregates the votes, updates its state, and uses the updated state to explain each lower-level capsule.
The ones that are well-explained end up routing more towards that parent.
This process is repeated, with the vote aggregation step taking into account the extent to which a part is routed to that parent.
Therefore, the states of the hidden units and the routing probabilities are inferred in an iterative way, analogous to the M-step and E-step, respectively, of an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm.
Dynamic Routing (Sabour et al., 2017) and EMrouting (Hinton et al., 2018) can both be seen as variants of this scheme that share the basic iterative structure but differ in terms of details, such as their capsule design, how the votes are aggregated, and whether a non-linearity is used.
We introduce a novel routing algorithm, which we called Inverted Dot-Product Attention Routing.
In our method, the routing procedure resembles an inverted attention mechanism, where dot products are used to measure agreement.
Specifically, the higher-level (parent) units compete for the attention of the lower-level (child) units, instead of the other way around, which is commonly used in attention models.
Hence, the routing probability directly depends on the agreement between the parent's pose (from the previous iteration step) and the child's vote for the parent's pose (in the current iteration step).
We also propose two modifications for our routing procedure -(1) using Layer Normalization (Ba et al., 2016) as normalization, and (2) doing inference of the latent capsule states and routing probabilities jointly across multiple capsule layers (instead of doing it layer-wise).
These modifications help scale up the model to more challenging datasets.
Our model achieves comparable performance as the state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs), but with much fewer parameters, on CIFAR-10 (95.14% test accuracy) and CIFAR-100 (78.02% test accuracy).
We also introduce a challenging task to recognize single and multiple overlapping objects simultaneously.
To be more precise, we construct the DiverseMultiMNIST dataset that contains both single-digit and overlapping-digits images.
With the same number of layers and the same number of neurons per layer, the proposed CapsNet has better convergence than a baseline CNN.
Overall, we argue that with the proposed routing mechanism, it is no longer impractical to apply CapsNets on real-world tasks.
We will release the source code to reproduce the experiments.
In this work, we propose a novel Inverted Dot-Product Attention Routing algorithm for Capsule networks.
Our method directly determines the routing probability by the agreements between parent and child capsules.
Routing algorithms from prior work require child capsules to be explained by parent capsules.
By removing this constraint, we are able to achieve competitive performance against SOTA CNN architectures on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 with the use of a low number of parameters.
We believe that it is no longer impractical to apply capsule networks to datasets with complex data distribution.
Two future directions can be extended from this paper:
• In the experiments, we show how capsules layers can be combined with SOTA CNN backbones.
The optimal combinations between SOTA CNN structures and capsules layers may be the key to scale up to a much larger dataset such as ImageNet.
• The proposed concurrent routing is as a parallel-in-time and weight-tied inference process.
The strong connection with Deep Equilibrium Models (Bai et al., 2019) can potentially lead us to infinite-iteration routing.
Suofei Zhang, Quan Zhou, and Xiaofu Wu.
Fast dynamic routing based on weighted kernel density estimation.
In International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, pp. 301-309.
Springer, 2018.
A MODEL CONFIGURATIONS FOR CIFAR-10/CIFAR-100
The configuration choices of Dynamic Routing CapsNets and EM Routing CapsNets are followed by prior work (Sabour et al., 2017; Hinton et al., 2018) .
We empirically find their configurations perform the best for their routing mechanisms (instead of applying our network configurations to their routing mechanisms).
The optimizers are chosen to reach the best performance for all models.
We list the model specifications in Table 2 , 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.
We only show the specifications for CapsNets with a simple convolutional backbone.
When considering a ResNet backbone, two modifications are performed.
First, we replace the simple feature backbone with ResNet feature backbone.
Then, the input dimension of the weights after the backbone is set as 128.
A ResNet backbone contains a 3 × 3 convolutional layer (output 64-dim.), three 64-dim.
residual building block (He et al., 2016) with stride 1, and four 128-dim.
residual building block with stride 2.
The ResNet backbone returns a 16 × 16 × 128 tensor.
For the optimizers, we use stochastic gradient descent with learning rate 0.1 for our proposed method, baseline CNN, and ResNet-18 (He et al., 2016) .
We use Adam (Kingma & Ba, 2014) with learning rate 0.001 for Dynamic Routing CapsNets and Adam with learning rate 0.01 for EM Routing CapsNets.
We decrease the learning rate by 10 times when the model trained on 150 epochs and 250 epochs, and there are 350 epochs in total.

assistant: text: We present a new routing method for Capsule networks, and it performs at-par with ResNet-18 on CIFAR-10/ CIFAR-100.