user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Input Complexity and Out-of-distribution Detection with Likelihood-based Generative Models

Paper content:
Likelihood-based generative models are a promising resource to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs which could compromise the robustness or reliability of a machine learning system.
However, likelihoods derived from such models have been shown to be problematic for detecting certain types of inputs that significantly differ from training data.
In this paper, we pose that this problem is due to the excessive influence that input complexity has in generative models' likelihoods.
We report a set of experiments supporting this hypothesis, and use an estimate of input complexity to derive an efficient and parameter-free OOD score, which can be seen as a likelihood-ratio, akin to Bayesian model comparison.
We find such score to perform comparably to, or even better than, existing OOD detection approaches under a wide range of data sets, models, model sizes, and complexity estimates.
Assessing whether input data is novel or significantly different than the one used in training is critical for real-world machine learning applications.
Such data are known as out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs, and detecting them should facilitate safe and reliable model operation.
This is particularly necessary for deep neural network classifiers, which can be easily fooled by OOD data (Nguyen et al., 2015) .
Several approaches have been proposed for OOD detection on top of or within a neural network classifier (Hendrycks & Gimpel, 2017; Lakshminarayanan et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2018) .
Nonetheless, OOD detection is not limited to classification tasks nor to labeled data sets.
Two examples of that are novelty detection from an unlabeled data set and next-frame prediction from video sequences.
A rather obvious strategy to perform OOD detection in the absence of labels (and even in the presence of them) is to learn a density model M that approximates the true distribution p * (X ) of training inputs x ∈ X (Bishop, 1994) .
Then, if such approximation is good enough, that is, p(x|M) ≈ p * (x), OOD inputs should yield a low likelihood under model M. With complex data like audio or images, this strategy was long thought to be unattainable due to the difficulty of learning a sufficiently good model.
However, with current approaches, we start having generative models that are able to learn good approximations of the density conveyed by those complex data.
Autoregressive and invertible models such as PixelCNN++ (Salimans et al., 2017) and Glow (Kingma & Dhariwal, 2018) perform well in this regard and, in addition, can approximate p(x|M) with arbitrary accuracy.
Figure 1 : Likelihoods from a Glow model trained on CIFAR10.
Qualitatively similar results are obtained for other generative models and data sets (see also results in Choi et al., 2018; Nalisnick et al., 2019a) .
trained on CIFAR10, generative models report higher likelihoods for SVHN than for CIFAR10 itself ( Fig. 1 ; data descriptions are available in Appendix A).
Intriguingly, this behavior is not consistent across data sets, as other ones correctly tend to produce likelihoods lower than the ones of the training data (see the example of TrafficSign in Fig. 1 ).
A number of explanations have been suggested for the root cause of this behavior (Choi et al., 2018; Nalisnick et al., 2019a; Ren et al., 2019) but, to date, a full understanding of the phenomenon remains elusive.
In this paper, we shed light to the above phenomenon, showing that likelihoods computed from generative models exhibit a strong bias towards the complexity of the corresponding inputs.
We find that qualitatively complex images tend to produce the lowest likelihoods, and that simple images always yield the highest ones.
In fact, we show a clear negative correlation between quantitative estimates of complexity and the likelihood of generative models.
In the second part of the paper, we propose to leverage such estimates of complexity to detect OOD inputs.
To do so, we introduce a widely-applicable OOD score for individual inputs that corresponds, conceptually, to a likelihoodratio test statistic.
We show that such score turns likelihood-based generative models into practical and effective OOD detectors, with performances comparable to, or even better than the state-of-theart.
We base our experiments on an extensive collection of alternatives, including a pool of 12 data sets, two conceptually-different generative models, increasing model sizes, and three variants of complexity estimates.
We illustrate a fundamental insight with regard to the use of generative models' likelihoods for the task of detecting OOD data.
We show that input complexity has a strong effect in those likelihoods, and pose that it is the main culprit for the puzzling results of using generative models' likelihoods for OOD detection.
In addition, we show that an estimate of input complexity can be used to com- Ren et al. (2019) ,
(b) by Lee et al. (2018) , and
(c) by Choi et al. (2018) .
Results for Typicality test correspond to using batches of 2 samples of the same type.
Trained on: FashionMNIST CIFAR10 OOD data:
MNIST Omniglot SVHN CelebA CIFAR100 Classifier-based approaches ODIN (Liang et al., 2018) (Choi et al., 2018) 0.766 0.796 1.000 0.997 -Outlier exposure (Hendrycks et al., 2019) --0.758 -0.685 Typicality test (Nalisnick et al., 2019b) 0.140 -0.420 --Likelihood-ratio (Ren et al., 2019) 0.997 -0.912 --S using Glow and FLIF (ours) 0.998 1.000 0.950 0.863 0.736 S using PixelCNN++ and FLIF (ours) 0.967 1.000 0.929 0.776 0.535 pensate standard negative log-likelihoods in order to produce an efficient and reliable OOD score.
We also offer an interpretation of our score as a likelihood-ratio akin to Bayesian model comparison.
Such score performs comparably to, or even better than several state-of-the-art approaches, with results that are consistent across a range of data sets, models, model sizes, and compression algorithms.
The proposed score has no hyper-parameters besides the definition of a generative model and a compression algorithm, which makes it easy to employ in a variety of practical problems and situations.

assistant: text: We pose that generative models' likelihoods are excessively influenced by the input's complexity, and propose a way to compensate it when detecting out-of-distribution inputs