user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: ConQUR: Mitigating Delusional Bias in Deep Q-Learning

Paper content:
Delusional bias is a fundamental source of error in approximate Q-learning.
To date, the only techniques that explicitly address delusion require comprehensive search using tabular value estimates.
In this paper, we develop efficient methods to mitigate delusional bias by training Q-approximators with labels that are "consistent" with the underlying greedy policy class.
We introduce a simple penalization scheme that encourages Q-labels used across training batches to remain (jointly) consistent with the expressible policy class.
We also propose a search framework that allows multiple Q-approximators to be generated and tracked, thus mitigating the effect of premature (implicit) policy commitments.
Experimental results demonstrate that these methods can improve the performance of Q-learning in a variety of Atari games, sometimes dramatically.
Q-learning (Watkins & Dayan, 1992; Sutton & Barto, 2018) lies at the heart of many of the recent successes of deep reinforcement learning (RL) (Mnih et al., 2015; , with recent advancements (e.g., van Hasselt (2010); Bellemare et al. (2017) ; Wang et al. (2016) ; Hessel et al. (2017) ) helping to make it among the most widely used methods in applied RL.
Despite these successes, many properties of Q-learning are poorly understood, and it is challenging to successfully apply deep Q-learning in practice.
When combined with function approximation, Q-learning can become unstable (Baird, 1995; Boyan & Moore, 1995; Tsitsiklis & Roy, 1996; Sutton & Barto, 2018) .
Various modifications have been proposed to improve convergence or approximation error (Gordon, 1995; 1999; Szepesvári & Smart, 2004; Melo & Ribeiro, 2007; Maei et al., 2010; Munos et al., 2016) ; but it remains difficult to reliably attain both robustness and scalability.
Recently, Lu et al. (2018) identified a source of error in Q-learning with function approximation known as delusional bias.
It arises because Q-learning updates the value of state-action pairs using estimates of (sampled) successor-state values that can be mutually inconsistent given the policy class induced by the approximator.
This can result in unbounded approximation error, divergence, policy cycling, and other undesirable behavior.
To handle delusion, the authors propose a policy-consistent backup operator that maintains multiple Q-value estimates organized into information sets.
Each information set has its own backed-up Q-values and corresponding "policy commitments" responsible for inducing these values.
Systematic management of these sets ensures that only consistent choices of maximizing actions are used to update Q-values.
All potential solutions are tracked to prevent premature convergence on any specific policy commitments.
Unfortunately, the proposed algorithms use tabular representations of Q-functions, so while this establishes foundations for delusional bias, the function approximator is used neither for generalization nor to manage the size of the state/action space.
Consequently, this approach is not scalable to RL problems of practical size.
In this work, we propose CONQUR (CONsistent Q-Update Regression), a general framework for integrating policy-consistent backups with regression-based function approximation for Q-learning and for managing the search through the space of possible regressors (i.e., information sets).
With suitable search heuristics, our framework provides a computationally effective means for minimizing the effects of delusional bias in Q-learning, while admitting scaling to practical problems.
Our main contributions are as follows.
First we define novel augmentations of standard Q-regression to increase the degree of policy consistency across training batches.
While testing exact consistency is expensive, we introduce an efficient soft-consistency penalty that promotes consistency of new labels with earlier policy commitments.
Second, drawing on the information-set structure of Lu et al. (2018) , we define a search space over Q-regressors to allow consideration of multiple sets of policy commitments.
Third, we introduce heuristics for guiding the search over regressors, which is critical given the combinatorial nature of information sets.
Finally, we provide experimental results on the Atari suite (Bellemare et al., 2013) demonstrating that CONQUR can offer (sometimes dramatic) improvements over Q-learning.
We also show that (easy-to-implement) consistency penalization on its own (i.e., without search) can improve over both standard and double Q-learning.

assistant: text: We developed a search framework and consistency penalty to mitigate delusional bias.