user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Mincut Pooling in Graph Neural Networks

Paper content:
The advance of node pooling operations in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) has lagged behind the feverish design of new message-passing techniques, and pooling remains an important and challenging endeavor for the design of deep architectures.
In this paper, we propose a pooling operation for GNNs that leverages a differentiable unsupervised loss based on the minCut optimization objective.
For each node, our method learns a soft cluster assignment vector that depends on the node features, the target inference task (e.g., a graph classification loss), and, thanks to the minCut objective, also on the connectivity structure of the graph.
Graph pooling is obtained by applying the matrix of assignment vectors to the adjacency matrix and the node features.
We validate the effectiveness of the proposed pooling method on a variety of supervised and unsupervised tasks.
A fundamental component in deep convolutional neural networks is the pooling operation, which replaces the output of convolutions with local summaries of nearby points and is usually implemented by maximum or average operations (Lee et al., 2016) .
State-of-the-art architectures alternate convolutions, which extrapolate local patterns irrespective of the specific location on the input signal, and pooling, which lets the ensuing convolutions capture aggregated patterns.
Pooling allows to learn abstract representations in deeper layers of the network by discarding information that is superfluous for the task, and keeps model complexity under control by limiting the growth of intermediate features.
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) extend the convolution operation from regular domains, such as images or time series, to data with arbitrary topologies and unordered structures described by graphs (Battaglia et al., 2018) .
The development of pooling strategies for GNNs, however, has lagged behind the design of newer and more effective message-passing (MP) operations (Gilmer et al., 2017) , such as graph convolutions, mainly due to the difficulty of defining an aggregated version of the original graph that supports the pooled signal.
A naïve pooling strategy in GNNs is to average all nodes features (Li et al., 2016) , but it has limited flexibility since it does not extract local summaries of the graph structure, and no further MP operations can be applied afterwards.
An alternative approach consists in pre-computing coarsened versions of the original graph and then fit the data to these deterministic structures (Bruna et al., 2013) .
While this aggregation accounts for the connectivity of the graph, it ignores task-specific objectives as well as the node features.
In this paper, we propose a differentiable pooling operation implemented as a neural network layer, which can be seamlessly combined with other MP layers (see Fig. 1 ).
The parameters in the pooling layer are learned by combining the task-specific loss with an unsupervised regularization term, which optimizes a continuous relaxation of the normalized minCUT objective.
The minCUT identifies dense graph components, where the nodes features become locally homogeneous after the message-passing.
By gradually aggregating these components, the GNN learns to distil global properties from the graph.
The proposed minCUT pooling operator (minCUTpool) yields partitions that
1) cluster together nodes which have similar features and are strongly connected on the graph, and
2) take into account the objective of the downstream task.
The proposed method is straightforward to implement: the cluster assignments, the loss, graph coarsening, and feature pooling are all computed with standard linear algebra operations.
There are several differences between minCUTpool and classic SC methods.
SC partitions the graph based on the Laplacian, but does not account for the node features.
Instead, the cluster assignments s i found by minCUTpool depend on x i , which works well if connected nodes have similar features.
This is a reasonable assumption in GNNs since, even in disassortative graphs (i.e., networks where dissimilar nodes are likely to be connected (Newman, 2003) ), the features tend to become similar due to the MP operations.
Another difference is that SC handles a single graph and is not conceived for tasks with multiple graphs to be partitioned independently.
Instead, thanks to the independence of the model parameters from the number of nodes N and from the graph spectrum, minCUTpool can generalize to outof-sample data.
This feature is fundamental in problems such as graph classification, where each sample is a graph with a different structure, and allows to train the model on small graphs and process larger ones at inference time.
Finally, minCUTpool directly uses the soft cluster assignments rather than performing k-means afterwards.
We proposed a pooling layer for GNNs that coarsens a graph by taking into account both the the connectivity structure and the node features.
The layer optimizes a regularization term based on the minCUT objective, which is minimized in conjunction with the task-specific loss to produce node partitions that are optimal for the task at hand.
We tested the effectiveness of our pooling strategy on unsupervised node clustering tasks, by optimizing only the unsupervised clustering loss, as well as supervised graph classification tasks on several popular benchmark datasets.
Results show that minCUTpool performs significantly better than existing pooling strategies for GNNs.

assistant: text: A new pooling layer for GNNs that learns how to pool nodes, according to their features, the graph connectivity, and the dowstream task objective.