user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: PolyGAN: High-Order Polynomial Generators

Paper content:
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have become the gold standard when it comes to learning generative models for high-dimensional distributions.
Since their advent, numerous variations of GANs have been introduced in the literature, primarily focusing on utilization of novel loss functions, optimization/regularization strategies and network architectures.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the generator and investigate the use of high-order polynomials as an alternative class of universal function approximators.
Concretely, we propose PolyGAN, where we model the data generator by means of a high-order polynomial whose unknown parameters are naturally represented by high-order tensors.
We introduce two tensor decompositions that significantly reduce the number of parameters and show how they can be efficiently implemented by hierarchical neural networks that only employ linear/convolutional blocks.
We exhibit for the first time that by using our approach a GAN generator can approximate the data distribution without using any activation functions.
Thorough experimental evaluation on both synthetic and real data (images and 3D point clouds) demonstrates the merits of PolyGAN against the state of the art.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are currently one of the most popular lines of research in machine learning.
Research on GANs mainly revolves around:
(a) how to achieve faster and/or more accurate convergence (e.g., by studying different loss functions (Nowozin et al., 2016; Arjovsky & Bottou, 2017; Mao et al., 2017) or regularization schemes (Odena et al., 2018; Miyato et al., 2018; Gulrajani et al., 2017) ), and
(b) how to design different hierarchical neural networks architectures composed of linear and non-linear operators that can effectively model high-dimensional distributions (e.g., by progressively training large networks (Karras et al., 2018) or by utilizing deep ResNet type of networks as generators (Brock et al., 2019) ).
Even though hierarchical deep networks are efficient universal approximators for the class of continuous compositional functions (Mhaskar et al., 2016) , the non-linear activation functions pose difficulties in their theoretical analysis, understanding, and interpretation.
For instance, as illustrated in Arora et al. (2019) , element-wise non-linearities pose a challenge on proving convergence, especially in an adversarial learning setting (Ji & Liang, 2018) .
Consequently, several methods, e.g., Saxe et al. (2014) ; Hardt & Ma (2017) ; Laurent & Brecht (2018) ; Lampinen & Ganguli (2019) , focus only on linear models (with respect to the weights) in order to be able to rigorously analyze the neural network dynamics, the residual design principle, local extrema and generalization error, respectively.
Moreover, as stated in the recent in-depth comparison of many different GAN training schemes (Lucic et al., 2018) , the improvements may mainly arise from a higher computational budget and tuning and not from fundamental architectural choices.
In this paper, we depart from the choice of hierarchical neural networks that involve activation functions and investigate for the first time in the literature of GANs the use of high-order polynomials as an alternative class of universal function approximators for data generator functions.
This choice is motivated by the strong evidence provided by the Stone-Weierstrass theorem (Stone, 1948) , which states that every continuous function defined on a closed interval can be uniformly approximated as closely as desired by a polynomial function.
Hence, we propose to model the vector-valued generator function Gpzq : R d Ñ R o by a high-order multivariate polynomial of the latent vector z, whose unknown parameters are naturally represented by high-order tensors.
However, the number of parameters required to accommodate all higher-order correlations of the latent vector explodes with the desired order of the polynomial and the dimension of the latent vector.
To alleviate this issue and at the same time capture interactions of parameters across different orders of approximation in a hierarchical manner, we cast polynomial parameters estimation as a coupled tensor factorization (Papalexakis et al., 2016; Sidiropoulos et al., 2017) that jointly factorizes all the polynomial parameters tensors.
To this end, we introduce two specifically tailored coupled canonical polyadic (CP)-type of decompositions with shared factors.
The proposed coupled decompositions of the parameters tensors result into two different hierarchical structures (i.e., architectures of neural network decoders) that do not involve any activation function, providing an intuitive way of generating samples with an increasing level of detail.
This is pictorially shown in Figure 1 .
The result of the proposed PolyGAN using a fourth-order polynomial approximator is shown in Figure 1
(a), while Figure 1
(b) shows the corresponding generation when removing the fourth-order power from the generator.
Our contributions are summarized as follows:
• We model the data generator with a high-order polynomial.
Core to our approach is to cast polynomial parameters estimation as a coupled tensor factorization with shared factors.
To this end, we develop two coupled tensor decompositions and demonstrate how those two derivations result in different neural network architectures involving only linear (e.g., convolution) units.
This approach reveals links between high-order polynomials, coupled tensor decompositions and network architectures.
• We experimentally verify that the resulting networks can learn to approximate functions with analytic expressions.
• We show how the proposed networks can be used with linear blocks, i.e., without utilizing activation functions, to synthesize high-order intricate signals, such as images.
• We demonstrate that by incorporating activation functions to the derived polynomial-based architectures, PolyGAN improves upon three different GAN architectures, namely DC-GAN (Radford et al., 2015) , SNGAN (Miyato et al., 2018) and SAGAN (Zhang et al., 2019) .
(a)
(b) Figure 1: Generated samples by an instance of the proposed PolyGAN.
(a) Generated samples using a fourth-order polynomial and
(b) the corresponding generated samples when removing the terms that correspond to the fourth-order.
As evidenced, by extending the polynomial terms, PolyGAN generates samples with an increasing level of detail.
We express data generation as a polynomial expansion task.
We model the high-order polynomials with tensorial factors.
We introduce two tailored coupled decompositions and show how the polynomial parameters can be implemented by hierarchical neural networks, e.g. as generators in a GAN setting.
We exhibit how such polynomial-based generators can be used to synthesize images by utilizing only linear blocks.
In addition, we empirically demonstrate that our polynomial expansion can be used with non-linear activation functions to improve the performance of standard state-of-the-art architectures.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that our approach reveals links between high-order polynomials, coupled tensor decompositions and network architectures.
Algorithm 1: PolyGAN (model 1).
% Perform the Hadamard product for the n th layer.
Algorithm 2: PolyGAN (model 2).
for n=2:N do 6 % Multiply with the current layer weight S rns and perform the Hadamard product.
κ "´S rns κ`pB rns q T b rns¯˚´p A rns q T v7 end 8 x " β`Cκ.
The appendix is organized as:
• Section B provides the Lemmas and their proofs required for our derivations.
• Section C generalizes the Coupled CP decomposition for N th order expansion.
• Section D extends the experiments to 3D manifolds.
• In Section E, additional experiments on image generation with linear blocks are conducted.
• Comparisons with popular GAN architectures are conducted in Section F. Specifically, we utilize three popular generator architectures and devise their polynomial equivalent and perform comparisons on image generation.
We also conduct an ablation study indicating how standard engineering techniques affect the image generation of the polynomial generator.
• In Section G, a comparison between the two proposed decompositions is conducted on data distributions from the previous Sections.

assistant: text: We model the data generator (in GAN) by means of a high-order polynomial represented by high-order tensors.