user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Bias Also Matters: Bias Attribution for Deep Neural Network Explanation

Paper content:
The gradient of a deep neural network (DNN) w.r.t. the input provides information that can be used to explain the output prediction in terms of the input features and has been widely studied to assist in interpreting DNNs.
In a linear model (i.e., $g(x)=wx+b$), the gradient corresponds solely to the weights $w$.
Such a model can reasonably locally linearly approximate a smooth nonlinear DNN, and hence the weights of this local model are the gradient.
The other part, however, of a local linear model, i.e., the bias $b$, is usually overlooked in attribution methods since it is not part of the gradient.
In this paper, we observe that since the bias in a DNN also has a non-negligible contribution to the correctness of predictions, it can also play a significant role in understanding DNN behaviors.
In particular, we study how to attribute a DNN's bias to its input features.
We propose a backpropagation-type algorithm ``bias back-propagation (BBp)'' that starts at the output layer and iteratively attributes the bias of each layer to its input nodes as well as combining the resulting bias term of the previous layer.
This process stops at the input layer, where summing up the attributions over all the input features exactly recovers $b$.
Together with the backpropagation of the gradient generating $w$, we can fully recover the locally linear model $g(x)=wx+b$.
Hence, the attribution of the DNN outputs to its inputs is decomposed into two parts, the gradient $w$ and the bias attribution, providing separate and complementary explanations.
We study several possible attribution methods applied to the bias of each layer in BBp.
In experiments, we show that BBp can generate complementary and highly interpretable explanations of DNNs in addition to gradient-based attributions.
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have produced good results for many challenging problems in computer vision, natural language processing, and speech processing.
Deep learning models, however, are usually designed using fairly high-level architectural decisions, leading to a final model that is often seen as a difficult to interpret black box.
DNNs are a highly expressive trainable class of non-linear functions, utilizing multi-layer architectures and a rich set of possible hidden non-linearities, making interpretation by a human difficult.
This restricts the reliability and usability of DNNs especially in mission-critical applications where a good understanding of the model's behavior is necessary.The gradient is a useful starting point for understanding and generating explanations for the behavior of a complex DNN.
Having the same dimension as the input data, the gradient can reflect the contribution to the DNN output of each input dimension.
Not only does the gradient yield attribution information for every data point, but also it helps us understand other aspects of DNNs, such as the highly celebrated adversarial examples and defense methods against such attacks BID13 .When
a model is linear, the gradient recovers the weight vector. Since
a linear model locally approximates any sufficiently smooth non-linear model, the gradient can also be seen as the weight vector of that local linear model for a given DNN at a given data point. For a
piecewise linear DNN (e.g., a DNN with activation functions such as ReLU, LeakyReLU, PReLU, and hard tanh) the gradient is exactly the weights of the local linear model 1 .Although
the gradient of a DNN has been shown to be helpful in understanding the behavior of a DNN, the other part of the locally linear model, i.e., the bias term, to the best of our knowledge, has not been studied explicitly and is often overlooked. If only
considering one linear model within a small region, the bias, as a scalar, seems to contain less information than the weight vector. However
, this scalar is the result of complicated processing of bias terms over every neuron and every layer based on the activations, the non-linearity functions, as well as the weight matrices of the network. Uncovering
the bias's nature could potentially reveal a rich vein of attribution information complementary to the gradient. For classification
tasks, it can be the case that the gradient part of the linear model contributes to only a negligible portion of the target label's output probability (or even a negative logit value), and only with a large bias term does the target label's probability becomes larger than that of other labels to result in the correct prediction (see Sec 5). In our empirical experiments
TAB0 , using only the bias term of the local linear models achieves 30-40% of the performance of the complete DNN, thus indicating that the bias term indeed plays a substantial role in the mechanisms of a DNN.In this paper, we unveil the information embedded in the bias term by developing a general bias attribution framework that distributes the bias scalar to every dimension of the input data. We propose a backpropagation-type
algorithm called "bias backpropagation (BBp)" to send and compute the bias attribution from the output and higher-layer nodes to lower-layer nodes and eventually to the input features, in a layer-by-layer manner. Specifically, BBp utilizes a recursive
rule to assign the bias attribution on each node of layer to all the nodes on layer − 1, while the bias attribution on each node of layer − 1 is composed of the attribution sent from the layer below and the bias term incurred in layer − 1. The sum of the attributions over all input
dimensions produced by BBp exactly recovers the bias term in the local linear model representation of the DNN at the given input point. In experiments, we visualize the bias attribution
results as images on a DNN trained for image classification. We show that bias attribution can highlight essential
features that are complementary from what the gradient-alone attribution methods favor.

assistant: text: Attribute the bias terms of deep neural networks to input features by a backpropagation-type algorithm; Generate complementary and highly interpretable explanations of DNNs in addition to gradient-based attributions.