user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Improving Gaussian mixture latent variable model convergence with Optimal Transport

Paper content:
Generative models with both discrete and continuous latent variables are highly motivated by the structure of many real-world data sets.
They present, however, subtleties in training often manifesting in the discrete latent variable not being leveraged.
In this paper, we show why such models struggle to train using traditional log-likelihood maximization, and that they are amenable to training using the Optimal Transport framework of Wasserstein Autoencoders.
We find our discrete latent variable to be fully leveraged by the model when trained, without any modifications to the objective function or significant fine tuning.
Our model generates comparable samples to other approaches while using relatively simple neural networks, since the discrete latent variable carries much of the descriptive burden.
Furthermore, the discrete latent provides significant control over generation.
Unsupervised learning using generative latent variable models provides a powerful and general approach to learning the underlying, low-dimensional structure from large, unlabeled datasets.
Perhaps the two most common techniques for training such models are Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) , and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) BID8 .
Both have advantages and disadvantages.
VAEs provide a meaningful lower bound on the log likelihood that is stable under training, as well as an encoding distribution from the data into the latent.
However, they generate blurry samples due to their objective being unable to handle deterministic decoders and tractability requiring simple priors BID12 .
On the other hand, GANs naturally enable deterministic generative models with sharply defined samples, but their training procedure is less stable .A
relatively new approach to training generative models has emerged based on minimizing the Optimal Transport (OT) distance BID30 ) between the generative model distribution and that of the data. The
OT approach provides a general framework for training generative models, which promises some of the best of both GANs and VAEs. Though
interesting first results have been given in ; BID27 ; , the OT approach to generative modelling is still nascent.Our contributions are twofold: we seek to improve generative modelling capabilities with discrete and continuous latent variables, but importantly, we seek also to establish that training generative models with OT can be significantly more effective than the traditional VAE approach.Discrete latent-variable models are critical to the endeavor of unsupervised learning because of the ubiquity of discreteness in the natural world, and hence in the datasets that describe it. However
, they are harder to train than their continuous counterparts. This has
been tackled in a number of ways (e.g., directly mitigating high-variance discrete samples BID6 BID19 , parametrizing discrete distributions using continuous ones BID14 BID22 BID29 , deliberate model design leveraging conjugacy ).However,
even in the simple case where the number of mixtures is small enough that monte-carlo sampling from the discrete latent is avoidable, training can still be problematic. For example
, in BID4 a Gaussian-mixture latent-variable model (GM-LVM) was studied, and the authors were unable to train their model on MNIST using variational inference without substantially modifying the VAE objective. What appears
to happen is that the model quickly learns to "hack" the VAE objective function by collapsing the discrete latent variational distribution. This problem
only occurs in the unsupervised setting, as are able to learn the discrete latent in the semi-supervised version of the same problem once they have labeled samples for the discrete latent to latch onto. This is discussed
in more detail in Section 2.1.The OT approach to training generative models (in particular the Wasserstein distance, discussed in Section 2.2) induces a weaker topology on the space of distributions, enabling easier convergence of distributions than in the case of VAEs BID2 . Thus, one might conjecture
that the OT approach would enable easier training of GM-LVMs than the VAE approach. We provide evidence that this
is indeed the case, showing that GM-LVMs can be trained in the unsupervised setting on MNIST, and motivating further the value of the OT approach to generative modelling.
We studied an unsupervised generative model with a mixture-of-Gaussians latent variable structure, well suited to data containing discrete classes of objects with continuous variation within each class.
We showed that such a simple and critical class of models fails to train using the VAE framework, in the sense that it immediately learns to discard its discrete-latent structure.
We further exposed the root cause of this phenomenon with empirical results.
We then put to the test the abstract mathematical claim that the Wasserstein distance induces a weaker topology on the space of distributions by attempting to train the same mixture-of-Gaussians model in the WAE framework.
We found the Wasserstein objective is successful at training this model to leverage its discrete-continuous latent structure fully.
We provided promising results on MNIST and demonstrated the additional control available to a highly structured model with both discrete and continuous latent variables.
We hope this motivates further study of the exciting but nascent field of Optimal Transport in generative modeling.

assistant: text: This paper shows that the Wasserstein distance objective enables the training of latent variable models with discrete latents in a case where the Variational Autoencoder objective fails to do so.