user: text: Write a concise one-sentence TLDR summary of the scientific paper content below.

Title: Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational Agents

Paper content:
In open-domain dialogue intelligent agents should exhibit the use of knowledge, however there are few convincing demonstrations of this to date.
The most popular sequence to sequence models typically “generate and hope” generic utterances that can be memorized in the weights of the model when mapping from input utterance(s) to output, rather than employing recalled knowledge as context.
Use of knowledge has so far proved difficult, in part because of the lack of a supervised learning benchmark task which exhibits knowledgeable open dialogue with clear  grounding.
To that end we collect and release a large dataset with conversations directly grounded with knowledge retrieved from Wikipedia.
We then design architectures capable of retrieving knowledge, reading and conditioning on it, and finally generating natural responses.
Our best performing dialogue models are able to conduct knowledgeable discussions on open-domain topics as evaluated by automatic metrics and human evaluations, while our new benchmark allows for measuring further improvements in this important research direction.
Arguably, one of the key goals of AI, and the ultimate the goal of natural language research, is for humans to be able to talk to machines.
In order to get close to this goal, machines must master a number of skills: to be able to comprehend language, employ memory to retain and recall knowledge, to reason about these concepts together, and finally output a response that both fulfills functional goals in the conversation while simultaneously being captivating to their human speaking partner.
The current state-of-the-art approaches, sequence to sequence models of various kinds BID20 BID23 BID17 BID21 attempt to address some of these skills, but generally suffer from an inability to bring memory and knowledge to bear; as indicated by their name, they involve encoding an input sequence, providing limited reasoning by transforming their hidden state given the input, and then decoding to an output.
To converse intelligently on a given topic, a speaker clearly needs knowledge of that subject, and it is our contention here that more direct knowledge memory mechanisms need to be employed.
In this work we consider setups where this can be naturally measured and built.We consider the task of open-domain dialogue, where two speakers conduct open-ended chit-chat given an initial starting topic, and during the course of the conversation the topic can broaden or focus on related themes.
During such conversations, an interlocutor can glean new information and personal points of view from their speaking partner, while providing similarly themselves.
This is a challenging task as it requires several components not found in many standard models.
We design a set of architectures specifically for this goal that combine elements of Memory Network architectures BID19 to retrieve knowledge and read and condition on it, and Transformer architectures BID21 to provide state-of-the-art text representations and sequence models for generating outputs, which we term Transformer Memory Networks.As, to our knowledge, no public domain dataset of requisite scale exists, we build a supervised dataset of human-human conversations using crowd-sourced workers, first crowd-sourcing 1365 diverse discussion topics and then conversations involving 201, 999 utterances about them.
Each topic is connected to Wikipedia, and one of the humans (the wizard) is asked to link the knowledge they use to sentences from existing articles.
In this way, we have both a natural way to train a knowledgeable conversation agent, by employing a memory component that can recall and ground on this existing text, and a natural way to evaluate models that we build, by assessing their ability at locating and using such knowledge.Our Transformer Memory Network architectures, both in retrieval and generative versions, are tested in this setup using both automatic metrics and human evaluations.
We show their ability to execute engaging knowledgeable conversations with humans, compared to a number of baselines such as standard Memory Networks or Transformers.
Our new benchmark, publicly in ParlAI (http:// parl.ai/projects/wizard of wikipedia/), aims to encourage and measure further improvements in this important research direction.
In this work we build dialogue agents which are able to employ large memory systems containing encyclopedic knowledge about the world in order to conduct engaging open-domain conversations.
We develop a set of architectures, Transformer Memory Network models, that are capable of retrieving and attending to such knowledge and outputting a response, either in retrieval or generative modes.
To train and evaluate such models, we collect the Wizard of Wikipedia dataset, a large collection of open-domain dialogues grounded by Wikipedia knowledge, and demonstrated the effectiveness of our models in automatic and human experiments.
Our new publicly available benchmark aims to encourage further model exploration, and we expect such efforts will result in significant advances in this important research direction.There is much future work to be explored using our task and dataset.
Some of these include:
(i) bridging the gap between the engagingness of retrieval responses versus the ability of generative models to work on new knowledge and topics,
(ii) learning to retrieve and reason simultaneously rather than using a separate IR component; and
(iii) investigating the relationship between knowledge-grounded dialogue and existing QA tasks which also employ such IR systems.
The aim is for those strands to come together to obtain an engaging and knowledgeable conversational agent.
Examples of collected conversations from the dataset, where both wizard and apprentice are humans.
The wizard has access to an information retrieval system over Wikipedia, so that they can ask and answer questions, and make statements relevant to the discussion.
For each utterance, knowledge retrieval is performed based on dialogue history, giving ∼61 knowledge candidates per turn, with wizards clicking no sentence used 6.2% of the time.Assuming that a question contains a question mark or begins with 'how', 'why', 'who', 'where', 'what' or 'when' , in the dataset Apprentices ask questions in 13.9% of training set utterances, and answer questions (i.e., the Wizard has asked a question) 39.5% of the time, while saying new or follow-on statements (neither asking nor answering a question) 49.3% of the time.
Hence, the wizard and apprentice conduct conversations with a variety of dialogue acts.

assistant: text: We build knowledgeable conversational agents by conditioning on Wikipedia + a new supervised task.