alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2683 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2683

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 27 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the operation of the migrant student record transfer system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RECORD TRANSFER SYSTEM.

    (a) Program Extension.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
Federal law, the Secretary of Education shall extend the contract for 
the operation of the migrant student record transfer system under 
section 1203(a)(2)(A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 to operate such system until such time as the Secretary of 
Education determines is necessary, but shall not extend such contract 
beyond June 30, 1995, without conducting a competition.
    (b) Program Modification.--Major modification of such system may be 
made only after consultation with the Committee on Education and Labor 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human 
Resources of the Senate.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<CIK>               0001026215
<NAME>              BOULDER CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES II, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
<CURRENCY>                             US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                            0
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       19,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               19,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           652
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     60,600
<OTHER-SE>                                  (41,845)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 19,407
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE


Depository Library Council to the Public Printer; Meeting

    The Depository Library Council to the Public Printer (DLC) will 
meet on Sunday, April 1, 2001, through Wednesday, April 4, 2001, in San 
Antonio, Texas. The sessions will take place from 7:30 p.m. until 10 
p.m. on Sunday, 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. on Monday and Tuesday and from 
8:30 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday. The meeting will be held at the 
Adam's Mark San Antonio Riverwalk Hotel, 111 Pecan Street East, San 
Antonio, Texas. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Federal 
Depository Library Program. All sessions are open to the public.
    A limited number of hotel rooms have been reserved at the Adam's 
Mark San Antonio Riverwalk Hotel for anyone needing hotel 
accommodations. Telephone: 210-354-2800. Please specify the U.S. 
Government Printing Office when you contact the hotel. Room cost per 
night is $91 (plus tax) per night single and $115 (plus tax) per night 
double, triple or quad through March 5, 2001.

Michael F. DiMario,
Public Printer.
[FR Doc. 01-4855 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1520-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         March 30, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         31 Center Drive, Conference Rm. B2B32, NHGRI, MD  20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD  20892, 301-402-0838.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 28, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-5444  Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EX-35.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



CW Capital Commercial Funding Corp.
One Charles River Place
63 Kendrick Street
Needham, MS 02494


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has
been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008

/s/ Judith Rishel
JUDITH RISHEL
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COBALT CMBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COBALT CMBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
  2007-C2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COBALT CMBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
  2006-C1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee
#### Andrew GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph GARCIA and Gary King, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 14-2014.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 25, 2014.

Andrew Gonzales, Farmington, NM, pro se.

Jane Alissa Bernstein, Office of the Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before LUCERO, TYMKOVICH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Andrew Gonzales filed a pro se1 petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his seventh conviction in New Mexico for driving under the influence of alcohol. Gonzales was discharged from his sentence before the district court ruled on the petition. The district court subsequently dismissed his petition as *646moot because Gonzales was no longer in custody and there was no possibility of collateral consequences arising from the challenged conviction. Gonzales sought a certificate of appealability (COA), challenging the denial of his habeas petition.

We granted the COA, noting that reasonable jurists could find the district court erred in denying the petition on mootness grounds. Although a habeas petitioner who has been discharged from his sentence must demonstrate continuing collateral consequences for the case to remain justiciable, a felony conviction carries a presumption of collateral consequences. *Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998). The district court erred because the court did not apply the presumption of collateral consequences arising from Gonzales’s conviction and mistakenly assumed that the only relevant collateral consequences derived from the New Mexico DWI statute, N.M. Stat. § 66-08-102, under which Gonzales was convicted.

We asked the state to respond. The state now acknowledges that the district court erred in denying Gonzales’s petition on mootness grounds for substantially the same reasons we articulated in the order granting a COA.

This matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to VACATE the dismissal of Gonzales’s habeas petition and reconsider the petition in light of the state’s concession.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

1

. Because Gonzales is proceeding *pro se,*we construe his filings liberally. *Standifer v. Le-dezma,*653 F.3d 1276, 1277 (10th Cir.2011).
## PAUL EVANS

ATTORNEY AT LAW
811 Nueces Street AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 (512) 569-1418

Fax 692 -8002

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk October 27, 2015 Court of Appeals, Third District of Texas
P.O. Box 12547 Austin, TX 78711-2547

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03- 14 -00088-CR; 03- 14 -00408- CR

Trial Court Case Number: D-1- DC

- 12 -301231; D-1- DC

- 12 -203247

Style: Darius Dontae Lovings v. State of Texas

To the Honorable Court :

I am in receipt of your letter, dated October 8, 2015, and received on October 13, 2015. I write to confirm that I do in fact intend to argue the above styled and numbered causes before the Court at the designated time and place ( see cover of Appellant’s Brief, “ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

. ” )

Respectfully submitted,

__ /s/ Paul M. Evans__________
Paul M. Evans
811 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 569 -14 18 (512) 692

- 80 02 FAX
SBN 2403 8 88 5 paulmatthewevans@hotmail.com ACCEPTED
03-14-00088-CR
7563401 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
10/27/2015 3:23:03 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKCERTIFI CATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

Appellant’s Brief was delivered by e

- service facsimile to the office of the District

Attorney of Travis County

— mailing address P.O. Box 1748, Austin , Texas 78 767,

phy sical address 509 W. 11 th Street, Austin, Texas 78701

— on this the 27 th day of

October , 201 5

.

___/s/ Paul M. Evans_____________

Paul M . Evans

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Relying on the Microsoft Word 97

- 2003 Document word count utility, I

hereby certify that the present document contains 235 words, counting all

contents herein.

___/s/ Paul M. Evans_____________

Paul M . Evans
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                 |   |   |   |
| Dated:   May      27, 2008 |   |   |   | By:    |   | /s/  Steven Y.      MoskowitzSteven Y. Moskowitz |
|                                 |   |   |   |   |   | Principal      Executive Officer,Principal      Accounting Officer     Chief Executive Officer,      President, Directorand      Principal Accounting Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Dawn Kinard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Buckhead Community Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in the report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Dawn Kinard
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  | Dawn Kinard            
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March

26 , 2015.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00187

- CV

RUSSELL SELF , Appellant

V. HALLIBURTON ENERGY S ERVICES, INC. , Appellee
On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 03715


### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from an interlocutory order signed February 1 0, 2015 , denying appellant’s application to compel arbitration of the underlying dispute in Delaware. On March 17, 2015, appell ant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal “under protest

. ” See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. In his motion, appellant states the Texas2

arbitrator ordered him to dismiss the appeal , and appellant provided copies of the arbitrator’s orders

. Appellant’s motion is gra nted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
2009-0713.

#### State v. Heyne.

Warren App. No. CA2008-05-068.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
#### Bruce Allen RODDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cecilia R. REYNOLDS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-6460.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 25, 2013.

Decided: April 25, 2014.

Bruce Allen Roddy, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

*234Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Allen Roddy seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roddy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2682

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel SHILOH.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 1993

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the

United States for the vessel SHILOH.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and section 12106 and

5 12107 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of

6 Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

7 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the

8 coastwise trade of the United States (including on the
2

•HR 2682 IH

1 Great Lakes and their tributary and connecting waters in

2 trade with Canada) for the vessel SHILOH (official num3 ber 902675).

Æ