alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FDIC

 MULTIFAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING 

COMPLIANCE REPORT (continued) 

FDIC 

HOMEBUYER INCOME CERTIFICATION 

Instructions 

GENERAL.	 This form is to be completed by LI or VLI buyers of individual AHP condominium units or 

single family properties controlled by a bulk sale LURA. 

PART I. SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME DATA 

Item 1. Name List the names of all household members who will 

be occupying this unit. 

Item 2. Household Size Identify the total number of persons occupying the 

unit. 

Item 3. Household Income Check the appropriate income category: Very LowIncome (VLI) or Lower Income (LI). 

A. Assets: As prescribed in the Compliance Manual, verify and 

list the assets owned by this household. Indicate 

who owns the asset by listing the corresponding 

family member letter used in Item #1. Describe the 

asset; indicate the current market value; and 

estimate the income from the asset. Do not include 

as an asset the value of the unit being purchased. 

If the number of assets exceed the lines available, 

use additional sheets. Reference the additional 

sheets and include the totals for Cash Value and 

Income from Assets from these sheets as a single 

line. 

Item 4. Total Net Family Assets	 Enter the total cash value of all of the assets in this 

column. 

Item 5.	 Total Actual Asset Provide the total actual income anticipated from the 

Income assets listed. 

Item 6. Imputed Income From	 If the total in item 4 exceeds $5,000, multiply line 4 

Assets	 by the HUD approved passbook savings rate. To 

obtain up-to-date information on the passbook rate 

in use contact the monitoring agency. 

I-1
 
 

 FDIC

 MULTIFAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING 

COMPLIANCE REPORT (continued) 

B. Anticipated Annual Income As prescribed in the Compliance Manual, verify and 

list the gross amount of income anticipated by this 

household. Indicate who will be receiving this 

income by listing the corresponding family member 

letter used in Item #1 and indicate the gross amount 

in the appropriate column. 

If the number of household members with income 

exceeds the lines available, use additional sheets. 

Reference the additional sheets and include the 

totals for each type of income on the open line. 

Item 7. Total income, a - e Line 7, a - e, enter total income by source, including 

assets. 

Item 8. Annual income This is the total annual income of this household. 

Compare to the applicable AHDP income limit to 

determine eligibility. 

PART II HOMEBUYER CERTIFICATION 

The adult family members must sign Part II certifying the accuracy and completeness of the 

information provided on Part I of this form. 

PART III OWNER/AGENT CERTIFICATION 

Check the appropriate income designation: Very Low-Income (VLI) or Lower Income (LI). Agents 

must sign and date the certification. 

PART IV ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

Fill in the appropriate information, as needed. 

I-2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q/A of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the Report), I, Joseph K. Jachinowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                             
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|April 16, 2004 |  | /s/    JOSEPH K.
JACHINOWSKI                                
|               |  | Joseph K. Jachinowski                                       
|               |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
           ROBERT BASKIND, PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tilden Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Robert
Baskind, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



May 23, 2005                           /s/ ROBERT BASKIND
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Baskind
                                       President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       17
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose SANCHEZ-GARCIA, also known as Jorge Fajardo-Nava, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41452

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Sanchez-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *386the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard A. Baron, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 9, 2006                   /s/ Richard A. Baron
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Richard A. Baron,
                                          Executive Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer

This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7845

JOSEPH SLEDGE, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-692-5-BO) Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Sledge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Sledge, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(1) (2000). When a district court dismisses a habeas petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sledge has not made the requisite showing. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.01





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION


OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER







I, Gerald
Corcoran, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Thomas J. Anderson, Chief Financial
Officer, of R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, LLC. (“RJOFM”), the Managing Owner of
JWH Global Trust (the “Trust”), certify that, to my knowledge (i) the attached
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
attached Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Trust.














/s/ Gerald
      Corcoran
            
            /s/ Thomas J.
      AndersonGerald
      Corcoran
            Thomas J.
      AndersonChief Executive
      Officer
            Chief Financial
      OfficerR. J. O'Brien Fund
      Management, LLC, Managing Owner
            R. J. O'Brien Fund
      Management, LLC, Managing OwnerAugust 8,
    2008
            August 8,
    2008
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 180


CFR Correction In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 150 to 189, revised as of July 1, 2000, part 180 is corrected by adding § 180.200 to read as follows: § 180.200
  (a) 
                        *General.*
                         (1) Tolerances are established for residues of the fungicide 2,6- dichloro-4-nitroaniline in or on the following raw agricultural commodities. Unless otherwise specified, these tolerances prescribed in this paragraph provide for residues  from preharvest application only. Commodity
Parts per millionApricot (PRE- and POST-H)
20Bean, snap
20Carrot (POST-H)
10Celery
15Cherry, sweet (PRE- and POST-H)
20Cucumber
5Endive (escarole)
10Garlic
5Grape
10Lettuce
10Nectarine (PRE- and POST-H)
20Onion
10Peach (PRE- and POST-H)
20Plum (fresh prune) (PRE- and POST-H)
15Potato
0.25Rhubarb
10Sweet potato (POST-H)
10Tomato
5
 (2) Unless otherwise specified, these tolerances prescribed in this section provide for residues from preharvest application only. (b)
                        *Section 18 emergency exemptions*. Time-limited tolerances are established for combined residues of the fungicide, dicloran, 2,6-dichloro-4-nitroaniline in connection with use of the pesticide under section 18 emergency exemptions granted by EPA. The tolerances will expire and are revoked on the dates specified in the following table. Commodity
Parts per million
Expiration/Revocation DatePeanut, oil
6.0
10/31/01Peanuts
3.0
10/31/01
 (c)
                        *Tolerances with regional registrations.*
                         Reserved] (d)
                        *Indirect or inadvertent residues.*
                         [Reserved] 46 FR 27938 63 FR 162 63 FR 57073 64 FR 13096


[FR Doc. 01-55507 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 15.1

                  AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

          Re: Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.
              Registrations on Form S-8 and Form S-3

We are aware that our report dated July 31, 1998, on our review of interim
financial information of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. and subsidiary
as of and for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, and
included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1998 is incorporated by reference in the Company's registration
statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-21619, 333-27891 and 333-33533) and Form
S-3 (File No. 333-47995). Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of
1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration statement
prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
August 12, 1998
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Kontron Mobile Computing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dale R.
Szymborski, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Dale R. Szymborski
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Dale R. Szymborski
                                                President
                                                March 31, 2003
EX-33.12
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of
and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By: /s/ Shari Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President


Dated: February 29, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13729-13730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6951-2]


National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and 
Technology; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, 
EPA gives notice of a meeting of the National Advisory Council for 
Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice 
and recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on a broad range of 
environmental policy and management issues.
    NACEPT consists of a representative cross-section of EPA's partners 
and principle constituents who provide advice and recommendations on 
policy issues and serve as a sounding board for new strategies that the 
Agency is developing.
    The NACEPT is addressing several policy issues associated with 
EPA's human resource planning, the integration of key Agency planning 
processes, and the identification of emerging issues and trends facing 
the Agency. The NACEPT Council will: Present its recommendations 
regarding EPA's Workforce Capacity efforts to the Agency; provide an 
update on the identification of emerging issues and trends facing EPA 
over the next five to ten years; and continue to help the Agency 
identify ways to integrate its

[[Page 13730]]

human resource planning, information and technology planning, and 
strategic planning processes.

DATES: The NACEPT will hold a 2-day public meeting on Wednesday, March 
21, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Thursday, March 22, 2001 from 8:30 
a.m. to 3:45 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The NACEPT 2-day public meeting will be held at the Latham 
Hotel, 3000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. Materials or written 
comments may be transmitted to the Council through Gwendolyn Whitt, 
Designated Federal Officer/NACEPT, U.S. EPA, Office of Cooperative 
Environmental Management (1601A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20460. The public will have an opportunity to make 
comments directly to the Council during the first day of the meeting. 
Oral comments will be limited to a total time of five minutes. Requests 
to make oral comments must be submitted no later than March 15, 2001 to 
Gwendolyn Whitt, at the address above or faxed to (202) 501-0661. 
Anyone who has not reserved time in advance, may make comments during 
the public comment period as time allows.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gwendolyn Whitt, Designated Federal 
Officer, NACEPT, at (202) 564-9741.

    Dated: February 26, 2001.
Timothy O. Sherer,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Cooperative Environmental Management.
[FR Doc. 01-5571 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P