alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             495,932
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      701,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,565,101
<PP&E>                                           5,603,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                       8,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,257,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,547,207
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            12,361
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,098,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,257,903
<SALES>                                            785,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   785,969
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,069,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,356,862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,356,862)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.19)
        


</TABLE>
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION 
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN TRUST AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of the 25th day of April, 2000, by and between CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION, a Connecticut corporation with its principal office in Hartford, Connecticut (hereinafter referred to as "CNG") and PUTNAM
FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY (hereinafter referred to as the "Trustee").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, by Agreement dated ____________, 1999 (the "Agreement") CNG and the Trustee entered into an Agreement entitled Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the parties reserved the right to amend the Agreement in Section 12(a) thereof, subject to the conditions set forth therein; and

WHEREAS, CNG wishes to amend the Agreement in the particulars set forth below;

NOW, THEREFORE, the CNG and the Trustee agree to amend the Agreement, as heretofore amended by the First Amendment thereto, as follows effective immediately prior to the effective date of the consummation of the merger of CTG Resources, Inc. with and
into Oak Merger Co. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 1999, by and among CTG Resources, Inc., Energy East Corporation and Oak Merger Co.:

1.	By deleting Section 5(c) and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

"(c)	The Trustee may invest in securities (including stock or rights to acquire stock) or obligations issued by Energy East Corporation or successor thereto, including common stock thereof, as directed by the Employer."

2.	Except as herein above modified and amended, the Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to be duly executed and respective corporate seals to be hereunto affixed as of the date first above written.

ATTEST:				CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONS/ Jeffrey A. Hall       By S/ Jean S. McCarthyIts Vice President, Human Resources

ATTEST:				PUTNAM FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY        S/ Carol E. Peters       By S/ Tina CampellIts Senior Vice President

STATE OF CONNECTICUT	)
                                           SS.
HARTFORD
COUNTY OF HARTFORD		)

Personally appeared Jean S. McCarthy, Vice President Human Resources of Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation, signer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to behis her free act and deed as such
___________________, and the free act and deed of said corporation, before me.

Daisy Q. MendezCommissioner of the Superior Court   
Notary Public                           
My Commission Expires:  June 30, 2004

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS)
                                          
                                  )SS.
COUNTY OF NORFOLK                                 )
		Personally appeared Tina A. Campbell, Senior Vice President of Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company, signer of the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed as such ___________________, and the free act
and deed of said corporation, before me.

Carol E. Peters                     
Notary Public                      
My Commission Expires:  2/23/07
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 22

- 3196

___________________________ United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Tayrel Lamar Rulford
Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: June 13, 2023 Filed: July 26, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN
, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judg es

.

____________
PER CURIAM.

Tayrel Rulford pled guilty to a n information charging him with p ossession of

a s tolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(j) and 924(a)(2). He appeals his 120

- month sentence , asserting the district court 1 sentenc ed him based on an incorrect

1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.-2- belief that a mandatory minimum sentence applied

. Because any initial misunderstanding by the district court was immediately corrected and the district court relied on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) as we ll as the parties’ joint
sentenc ing recommendation, w e affirm.

Rulford ’s original charge —b eing an armed c areer c riminal in p ossession of a f

irearm
, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1)

— car ries a 15

- year mandatory minimum sentence

. During plea negotiations, Rulford agreed to plead guilty to possession of a s tolen firearm, which carries a maximum imprisonment
term of 120 month s and no mandatory minimum

. The parties’ agreement contemplated a joint recommendation for a sentence of 120 month s.

Consistent with their agreement, the parties request ed at sentencing that the district court impose a 120

- month sentence. After noting Rulford’s rehabilitative efforts , the court announced it was imposing a mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months

. After both parties immediately informed the court that the charge Rulford pled guilty to did not have a mandatory minimum
, the court promptly reconsidered and found the joint recommendation was appropriate under the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3 553

. In its written statement of reasons, the court indicated the sentence was based on the § 3553(a) factors.

Rulford c ontends the district court committed significant procedural error because it initially stated his offense was subject to a mandatory minimum sentence

. T he government seeks to enforce the plea agreement’s appeal waiver provision. Even assuming Rulford convince d us that the plea agreement did not bar his appeal
, his claim is foreclosed by the invited error doctrine

. A party “who invites the district court to make a particular ruling waives his right to claim on appeal that the ruling was erroneous.” United States v. Corn
, 47 F.4th 892, 895 (8th Cir. 2022)
, cert. denied , 143 S. Ct. 1093, 1093 (2023)

. Rulford specifically requ ested the sentence the district court imposed . The invited error doctrine precludes him from challenging his sentence on appeal. See id.-3- W e affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2795 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2795

 To expand the mail-order pharmaceutical program of the Department of 
   Defense to cover all members and former members of the uniformed 
  services, and their dependents, who are eligible for health care in 
             medical facilities of the uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 1993

Mr. Hall of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the mail-order pharmaceutical program of the Department of 
   Defense to cover all members and former members of the uniformed 
  services, and their dependents, who are eligible for health care in 
             medical facilities of the uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAIL-ORDER PHARMACEUTICALS.

    (a) Sale by Mail Required.--(1) Chapter 55 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074c the following 
new section:
``Sec. 1074d. Provision of pharmaceuticals by mail
    ``(a) Provision.--The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 
the other administering Secretaries, shall operate through facilities 
of the uniformed services a program to provide pharmaceuticals by mail 
to persons entitled or eligible under this chapter for medical and 
dental care in facilities of the uniformed services.
    ``(b) Cost of Postage.--A recipient of pharmaceuticals under this 
section shall be responsible for paying the postage required to send 
the pharmaceuticals by mail.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074c the 
following new item:

``1074d. Provision of pharmaceuticals by mail.''.
    (b) Operation of Program.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
that the program to provide pharmaceuticals by mail required by section 
1074d of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), is 
in nation-wide operation not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Filed 12/20/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 239

In the Interest of R.F.

Edwardo Yabut, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee

v.

R.F., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20160389

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 1727, Jamestown, ND 58402-1727, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Interest of R.F.

No. 20160389

Per Curiam.

[¶1]R.F. appealed the district court’s order continuing her hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication. R.F. argues the district court erred in finding that she: (1) posed a serious risk to herself or others if not hospitalized and (2) would not take her medication without a court order. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). 

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom
EXHIBIT 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 Entity
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation or FormationACN 073 757 543 Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaCallbookers Limited
    
    EnglandCheap Tickets Limited
    
    Englandebookers Limited
    
    Englandebookers.com Deutschland GmbH
    
    Germanyebookers.com SA
    
    Switzerlandebookers.ie Ltd
    
    Irelandebookers.nl BV
    
    Netherlandsebookers Scandinavia AB
    
    SwedenFlairview Travel Hotel Club S.L.
    
    SpainFlairview Travel Limited
    
    EnglandFlightbookers Limited
    
    EnglandHotelclub Limited
    
    EnglandHotelClub Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaHotelClub KK
    
    JapanInsurancebookers Limited
    
    EnglandInternetwork Publishing Corporation
    
    FloridaLa Compagnie Des Voyages SA
    
    FranceMr Jet Oy (Finland)
    
    FinlandNeat Group Corporation
    
    DelawareO Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz Away LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Financial Corp.
    
    DelawareOrbitz for Business, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz (Israel) Ltd.
    
    IsraelOrbitz, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Mexico Services, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoOrbitz Travel Insurance Services, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide (UK) Limited
    
    EnglandOWW Fulfillment Services, Inc.
    
    TennesseeOy ebookers Finland Ltd
    
    FinlandTerren Corporation
    
    CanadaTravel Acquisition Corporation Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaTrip Network, Inc.
    
    DelawareViajes ebookers S.L.
    
    Spain
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of First Trinity Financial Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 31, 2011                                                          By: /s/ Gregg E. Zahn


Gregg E. Zahn, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME,
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SCHEDULES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,386
<SECURITIES>                                    20,862
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,668)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,143
<PP&E>                                          31,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,916)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,963
<BONDS>                                         13,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,060
<SALES>                                        242,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,230
<CGS>                                          215,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    48
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,395
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
2009-1488.

#### State v. Nesbitt.

Hamilton App. No. C-080010, 2009-Ohio-972. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333- 174558) on Form F-3 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-171280) on FormS-8 of our reports dated April 30, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Exceed Company Ltd. and its subsidiaries(collectively the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting,which appeared in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April30, 2012.

 

/s/ Crowe Horwath (HK) CPA Limited

Hong Kong, China

June 4, 2012
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6416

MARCOS F. SANTIAGO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

– Appellee

.

No. 22

- 6580

MARCOS F. SANTIAGO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. ( 7:21

- cv - 00436

- JPJ

- PMS )

Submitted : March 21, 2023 Decided: March 23, 2023 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6416 Doc: 45 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Before WYNN and RICHARD S ON , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Marcos F. Santiago , Appellant Pro Se. Krista Consiglio Frith, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNTED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6416 Doc: 45 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Marcos F. Santiago appeals the district court’s orders dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his civil action seeking relief under the Federal Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671

- 80, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. Santiago v. United States , No. 7:21

- cv - 00436

- JPJ

- PMS (W.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2022 & Mar. 28, 2022). We deny Santiago’s motions for appointment of counsel, to compel or direct the United States to respond, an d for consideration of new evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6416 Doc: 45 Filed: 03/23/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tad M. Ballantyne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Tad M. Ballantyne Mr. Tad M. Ballantyne Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wu Qiyou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc..





By:
/s/ WU QIYOUDate: November 18, 2011

Name:
Wu QiyouTitle:
Chief Executive Officer





I, David Dodge, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.





By:
/s/ DAVID DODGEDate: November 18, 2011

Name:
David DodgeTitle:
Chief Financial Officer