SETTLE.MENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT 

This Settlement and Release Agreement (''Agreement") is made as of this l21h day of 

September, 2014, by and among the following undersigned parties: the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Colonial Bank (''FDIC-R"), The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 

("CBG"), and Federal Insurance Company ("Federal"). Individually, the FDIC-R, CBG, and 

Federal may be referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." 

SECTION l. RECITALS 

WHEREAS, 

l.l Prior to August 14, 2009, Colonial Bank (the ''Bank") was a state, nonmember 

depository institution organized and existing under the laws of the State of Alabama. 

l.2 On August 14, 2009, the Bank was dosed by the Alabama State Department of 

Banking, and, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § I S21 (c), the FDIC-R was appointed receiver. 

1.3 On August 25, 2009, CBG filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of 

the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Alabama 

(the "Bankruptcy Court") in a case styled: In re: The Colonial BancGroup, Inc., No. 09-32303 

(DHW), U.S.B.C., M.D. Ala. (the "Bankruptcy Case"). CBG was the holding company for the 

Bank prior to the order closing the Bank. 

1.4 CBG and the Bank arc "Assureds" under and as defined m the following 

insurance policies issued by Federal: (i) Financial Institution Bond No.L..I ___ ···-········-·······-·······-·······_.leffectivem(l:>.1(4.) 

from March I, 2009 to March I, 20 I 0 ("Form A"); (ii) Financial Institution Bond No.I ···········- ......... (.b.)(4.) 

(b)(4) ..... EJeffective from July 16, 2009 to July 16, 2010 ("Form B"); and (iii) Financial Institution 

(b)(4)_ .. ~l<:!~Jron.ic.and ... .Computc.r .. Crimc.PolicyNo,L..I ____ __,I effective from March I, 2009 to 
March I, 2010 (together with Forms A and B and the predecessors to those bonds issued by 

Federal to CBG and the Bank, collectively referred to as the ''Bonds"); 

1.5 Notice of the loss was given to Federal on August I 0, 2009, and was 

supplemented thereafter. On February 1, 2010, a proof of loss was submitted to Federal ("Proof 

of Loss"). 

1.6 The FDIC-R and CBG have filed the Bond Claim Lawsuit (as defined below) 

against Federal. 

1.7 The Panies deem it in their best interests to enter into this Agreement to avoid the 

uncertainty, trouble, and expense of further litigation of the Bond Claim Lawsuit. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, undertakings, payments, and 

releases stated herein, the sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, the 

undersigned Parties agree, each with the other, as follows: 

SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS; RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. 

2.1 Definitions. As used herein, the following terms shall have these meanings: 

"Account Orders" sha11 mean the orders of the Bankruptcy Court entered in the 

Bankruptcy Case at Docket Numbers 972 and 1020 which relate to the establishment of 

the Insurance Proceeds Holding Account and the disposition of the Settlement Funds. 

''Approval Motion" shall mean a motion which in all material respects is in accordance 

with the proposed motion attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to any modifications 

mutually agreeable to the Parties. 

"Approval Order" shall mean an order entered by the Bankruptcy Court which in all 

material respects is in accordance with the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit B, 

subject to any modifications mutually agreeable to the Parties. 

"Approval Period" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in Section 5.4. 

"Bankruptcy Condition" shall mean entry by the Bankruptcy Court of the Approval Order 

that becomes a Final Order. 

"Bond Claim Lawsuit" shall mean Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et a/. v. 

Federal Insurance Company, No.2: 11-CV-610-MHT-WC (M.D. Ala.). 

- 2-
"CBG v. FDIC-R Lawsuits" shall mean the lawsuits styled: The Colonial BancGroup, 

Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiverfor Colonial Bank, No. 2:10-

cv-198-MHT (M.D. Ala. filed Mar. 5, 2010) and In re The Colonial BancGroup, Inc., 

No. 2:10-cv-0409-MHT (M.D. Ala. filed May II, 2010). 

"Claims" shall mean any and all actual or potential claims, rights to payment or other 

relief, demands, obligations, damages, actions and causes of action, suits, controversies, 

interest, costs, attorneys' fees, expenses, damages, or judgments whatsoever, direct or 

indirect, in law or in equity, whether known or unknown, now existing or hereafter 

arising, whether contingent or liquidated, contractual, extra-contractual, non-contractual, 

statutory, in tort or otherwise, of every kind, nature and description. 

"Confidentiality Orders" shall mean the Confidentiality and Protective Order entered on 

November 14, 2011 fDoc. No. 541 in the Bond Claim Lawsuit, and the Stipulated NonWaiver Order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) entered on May I, 2012 I Doc. 

No. 77J in the Bond Claim Lawsuit. 

"Dismissal Order" shall mean an order entered by the District Court which in all material 

respects is in accordance with the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit C, subject to 

any modifications mutually agreeable to the Parties. 

"District Court" shall mean United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama, 

Montgomery Division. 

''Excluded Claims" shall mean: (a) any and all Claims relating to the Excluded Policies; 

(b) any and all Claims reserved in Sections 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 herein; (c) any and all Claims 

under the Confidentiality Orders; (d) any and all Claims by CBG or FDIC-R against 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Crowe Horwath LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, including 

Claims asserted in the lawsuits styled The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. et al. v. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP eta/., Case No. 2: 11-cv-00746-MHT-DHW (M.D. Ala.); 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc., eta/., v. PdcewaterhouseCoopers LLP, et al., Adv. Proc. 

No. ll-03063*SEALED* (Bankr. M.D. Ala.), The Colonial BancGroup, Inc.,. eta/., v. 

Ernst & Young LLP, Adv. Proc. No. 11-03065 (Bankr. M.D. Ala.); and Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation r. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. et a/., Case No. 2: 12-cv-00957-

WKW-TFM (M.D. Ala.), provided that nothing in this sub-paragraph (d) shall he deemed 

to preserve any claim against the aforementioned entities arising out of professional 

services performed directly for Federal or any of its affiliates in connection with the 

Bonds or Federal's investigation of any Claim made on the. Bonds. by the. FDIC-R or 

CBG~ (e) any and all Claims under this Agreement, including claims for attorneys' fees 

and expenses; and (f) any and all demands, defenses and/or counterclaims, unless 

otherwise released herein, that may be asserted in response to the Excluded Claims 

identified in sections (a) through (c) of this definition. 

"Excluded Policies" shall mean any and all Federal policies of insurance other than the 

Bonds. Without limiting the. generality of the. foregoing,. "Excluded Policies" shall 

include, but are not limited to, that certain directors' and officers' liability policy known 

as Federal Insurance Company Policy No.I .Jand.an.yscttlcmcnlrC.l~tC.c.!:Ih.~r.~!<:>:.H(I:>)(4.) 

- 3 -
"Final Order" shall mean an order or judgment that has not been reversed, stayed, 

modified or amended and as to which (i) any right to appeal or seek certiorari, review, 

reargument, stay or rehearing has expired and no appeal or petition for certiorari, review, 

reargument, stay or rehearing is pending, or (ii) an appeal has been taken or petition for 

certiorari, review, reargument, stay or rehearing has been filed and (a) such appeal or 

petition for certiorari, review, reargument, stay or rehearing has been resolved by the 

highest court to which the order or judgment was appealed or from which certiorari, 

review, reargument, stay or rehearing was sought and (b) the time to appeal further or 

seck certiorari, review, reargument, stay or rehearing has expired and no such further 

appeal or petition for certiorari, review, reargument, stay or rehearing is pending, 

provided that no order shall fail to become a Final Order solely because of the possibility 

that a motion pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Bankruptcy 

Rule 9024 may be filed with respect to such order. 

"Funding Transactions" shall mean Investment Funding Agreement dated October 23, 

2012 among CBG and the "Investor Parties" (as defined therein) and the Term Loan and 

Security Agreement dated October 23, 2012 among CBG and the "Lender Parties" (as 

defined therein). 

"Insurance Claims" shall mean any Claims arising out of the Bonds or the Bond Claim 

Lawsuit, including any Claims based upon or arising from: (i) the Proof of Loss; (ii) 

coverage of any kind under the Bonds; (iii) any notice of Claim or notice of potential 

Claim under the Bonds; (iv) Federal's investigation of any Claim made on the Bonds by 

the FDIC-R or CBG; or (v) any alleged misrepresentations, fraud, indemnity rights, 

contribution rights, subrogation rights, whether legal, equitable or otherwise, breach of 

contract, prejudgment interest, breach of any oral or written promise or breach of any 

duty grounded in law or in contract, negligence, bad faith, violation of any statute or 

regulation, unfair claims handling, or damages of any kind whatsoever arising from the 

matters described within this definition. 

"Insurance Proceeds Holding Account" shall mean the holding account established by 

the Account Orders. 

"Payment Date" shall mean the tenth (1Oth) business day following the date on which 

the Approval Order becomes a Final Order. 

''Person" shall mean any individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, 

limited liability partnership, joint venture, trust, or unincorporated organization or 

association, any "doing business as" entity, any other form of business or commercial 

entity, or a government or any governmental agency or political subdivision. 

''Plaintiffs" shall mean the FDIC-R and CBG, as co-plaintiffs in the Bond Claim Lawsuit. 

"Plan" shall mean the Second Amended Chapter II Plan of Liquidation of The Colonial 

BancGroup, Inc. as amended and confirmed in the Bankruptcy Case. 

"Plan Committee" shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in the Plan. 

-4-
"Plan Trustee" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the Plan. 

"Retained Professionals" shall mean accountants, auditors, advisors, attorneys, agents, 

and representatives who are not a past or present employee, officer, director or owner in 

any capacity of a Party or Parties and who were either retained by a Party or a Party's 

counsel for the purpose of assisting in the Bond Claim Lawsuit or, in the case of Federal, 

performed assigned duties for Federal in connection with the Bonds, the Bond Claim 

Lawsuit or any matters described within the definition of "Insurance Claims." 

''Settlement Funds" shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3.1 of this 

Agreement. 

"Stay Motion" shall mean a motion which in all material respects is in accordance with 

the proposed motion attached hereto as Exhibit D, subject to any modifications mutually 

agreeable to the Parties. 

"Stay Order" shall mean an order entered by the District Court which in all material 

respects is in accordance with the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit E, subject to 

any modifications mutually agreeable to the Parties. 

2.2 Rules of Constmction. The terms ''herein," "hereof," "hereunder" and "below" 

and other words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular 

section, paragraph or subdivision. Any pronoun used herein shall be deemed to cover all 

genders. The word "including" shall he understood to mean "including, without limitation." 

Words in the singular shall be deemed to include the plural and the plural to include the singular 

when the sense requires. References to any Person shall include such Person's successors and 

assigns. The descriptive headings of this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not 

affect the construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 

SECTION 3. PAYMENT OF SETTLEMENT PAYMENT 

3.1 Settlement. As an essential covenant and condition to this Agreement, and 

subject to the satisfaction of the Bankruptcy Condition which is a condition precedent to this 

Agreement and in consideration for the releases contained herein and other valuable 

consideration, Federal agrees to pay the sum of S30,000,000.00 (the ·'Settlement Funds") to 

settle the Insurance Claims pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 

- 5 -
(b)(4) 

(b)(4) 

3.2 Federal's Payment of Settlement Funds. By no later than the Payment Date, 

Federal shall directly wire the Settlement Funds into the Insurance Proceeds Holding Account in 

accordance with the following wire transfer instructions: 

Account Name: 

....................... Ac.co.unt .. Number: . 

Name of Bank: 

Bank Address: 

....................... AB.A ... .Ro.uting#: 

Colonial Bancgroup Inc 

l I 

Regions Bank 

150 4th A venue North 

Suite 900 

Nashville, TN 37219 

l I 

3.3 Interest. In the event that the Settlement Funds arc not transferred in accordance 

with the Agreement by the Payment Date, interest shall accrue on all unpaid amounts at the rate 

of 5% per annum from such date until the date of payment in full. Payment of such interest, if 

any, shall be transferred by wire in accordance with this Section 3.2. 

3.4 Disputes Under the Agreement. The Parties agree that, subject to pnor 

satisfaction of the Bankruptcy Condition, and to the fullest extent permitted by the District Court, 

any and all disputes regarding this Agreement, including the enforcement thereof, shall be 

submitted to Magistrate Judge Wallace Capel, Jr. of the District Court, or, in the event of his 

unavailability, another Magistrate Judge of that Court, and each Party consents to the authority of 

the Magistrate Judge to enter a final judgment regarding any resolution of a dispute or 

enforcement request relating to this Agreement. Each of the Parties further waives any right 

to jury trial in connection with any such request for resolution of a dispute relating to the 

Agreement, including enforcement of the Agreement. 

3.5 Attorneys' Fees. In any proceeding before the Magistrate to resolve a dispute 

relating to this Agreement, including the enforcement thereof, the prevailing Party or Parties 

shall be entitled to recover its or their reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses. All issues with 

regard to the amount or reasonableness of an award of attorneys' fees or expenses against CBG 

- 6-
shall be subject to review and approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Payment of reasonable 

attomeys' fees and expenses owed will be made directly to the Party entitled thereto. 

SECTION 4. RELEASES 

4.1 FDIC-R's Release of Federal. Effective only upon payment by Federal of the 

Settlement Funds, together with any accrued interest under Section 3.3 to the extent due, (i) the 

FDIC-R, for itself and, to the extent of its authority, the FDIC-R's directors, officers, employees, 

successors and assigns, releases and discharges Federal and its past and present parents, 

subsidiaries, affiliates, reinsurers, employees, officers, directors, representatives (i.e., Retained 

Professionals) and shareholders and each of their respective predecessors, successors and assigns 

from its Insurance Claims and (ii) all rights and interests the FDIC-R may have in the Bonds 

shall be extinguished and Federal shall have no further obligations to the FDIC-R thereunder, 

provided, however, 

(a) the release granted in this Section 4.1 shal1 not extend to or affect any 

Excluded Claims; and 

(b) the extinguishment described in this Section 4.1 shall not extend to any 

Excluded Policies. 

4.2 CBG's Release of Federal. Effective only upon payment by Federal of the 

Settlement Funds, together with any accrued interest under Section 3.3 to the extent due, (i) 

CBG, for itself and the Plan Trustee, and, as to CBG and to the extent of its authority, its past 

and present subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees, shareholders, Retained 

Professionals, predecessors, successors and assigns, releases and discharges Federal and its past 

and present parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, reinsurers, employees, officers, directors, Retained 

Professionals and shareholders and each of their respective predecessors, successors and assigns 

from its Insurance Claims and (ii) all rights and interests CBG may have in the Bonds shall be 

- 7-
extinguished and Federal shall have no further obligations to CBG thereunder, provided, 

however, 

(a) the release granted in this Section 4.2 shall not extend to or affect any 

Excluded Claims; and 

(b) the extinguishment described in this Section 4.2 shall not extend to any 

Excluded Policies. 

4.3 Federal's Release of FDIC-R. Effective simultaneously with the release granted 

in Section 4.1, Federal, for itself and, to the extent of its authority, its past and present parents, 

subsidiaries, affiliates, reinsurers, directors, officers, employees, shareholders, representatives 

(i.e., Retained Professionals), and each of their respective predecessors, successors and assigns, 

releases and discharges the FDIC-R and the FDIC-R's employees, officers and directors and 

each of their respective predecessors, successors and assigns, from its Insurance Claims, 

provided, however, 

(a) the release granted in this Section 4.3 shall not extend to or affect any 

Excluded Claims. 

4.4 Federal's Release of CBG. Effective simultaneously with the release granted in 

Section 4.2, Federal, for itself and, to the extent of its authority, its past and present parents, 

subsidiaries, affiliates, reinsurers, directors, officers, employees, shareholders, Retained 

Professionals, predecessors, successors and assigns, releases and discharges CBG and the Plan 

Trustee, and as to each, its past and present parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, employees, officers, 

directors, Retained Professionals and shareholders and each of their respective predecessors, 

successors and assigns from its Insurance Claims, provided, however, 

(a) the release granted in this Section 4.4 shall not extend to or affect any 

Excluded Claims. 

4.5 Express Reservations From Releases by FDlC-R. 

- 8 -
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, the FDIC-R docs 

not release, and expressly preserves fully and to the same extent as if this Agreement had 

not been executed, any Claims: 

(i) against any Person for liability, if any, incurred as the maker, 

endorser or guarantor of any promissory note or indebtedness payab1c or owed by 

such Person to the FDIC-R, the Bank, other financial institutions, or any other 

Person, including any such liability to the FDIC-R as successor in interest to the 

Bank or any Person other than the Bank; 

(ii) against any Person not expressly released in this Agreement by 

specific name, position or other reference; 

(iii) under or relating to any Excluded Policies; or 

(iv) which are not expressly released in Section 4.1 above. 

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision, this Agreement docs not waive or 

release any Claims, other than Insurance Claims, that could be brought by any agency or 

instrumentality of the United States government including the Department of Justice 

and/or the United States Attorney's Office for any federal judicial district, other than the 

FDIC-R. In addition, the FDIC-R specifically reserves the right to seck court-ordered 

restitution pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Victim and Witness Protections Act, 

IS U.S.C. § 3663, ct seq., if appropriate. 

(c) Notwithstanding any other provisions, nothing in this Agreement shall be 

construed or interpreted as limiting, waiving, releasing, or compromising the jurisdiction 

of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its corporate capacity, in the exercise of 

its supervisory or regulatory authority or to diminish its ability to institute administrative 

- 9-
enforcement proceedings seeking removal, prohibition or any other administrative 

enforcement action which may arise by operation of law, rule, or regulation. 

4.6 Express Reservations From Releases by CBG. 

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, CBG does not 

release, and expressly preserves fully and to the same extent as if this Agreement had not 

been executed, any Claims: 

(i) against any Person not expressly released in this Agreement by 

specific name, position or other reference; 

(ii) under or relating to any Excluded Policies; or 

(iii) which are not expressly released in Sections 4.2 above. 

4. 7 Express Reservations From Releases by Federal. 

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, Federal does not 

release, and expressly preserves fully and to the same extent as if this Agreement had not 

been executed, any Claims: 

(i) against any Person not expressly released in this Agreement by 

specific name, position or other reference; 

(ii) under or relating to any Excluded Policies; or 

(iii) which are not expressly released in Sections 4.3 and 4.4 above. 

4_g No Assignment of Insurance Claims. The Parties represent and warrant that they 

have not assigned to any other Person any Insurance Claims, excluding for the pmvose of this 

representation and warranty the grant of a security interest in and lien upon the Insurance Claims 

under the Funding Transactions. 

SECTION 5. BANKRUPTCY APPROVAL REQUIREMENT 

- 10-
5.1 Bankruptcy Condition. Satisfaction of the Bankruptcy Condition shall be a 

condition precedent to Federal's obligation to make payment of the Settlement Funds as 

described in Section 3.1 of this Agreement. 

5.2 Pursuit of Bankruptcy Court Approval. Within a reasonably prompt amount of 

time after the date of this Agreement, CBG wil1: (a) notify the Plan Committee in writing of this 

Agreement in accordance with Section 9.4(b) of the Plan; and (b) file with the Bankruptcy Court, 

pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Plan, the Bankruptcy Code and Rule 9019 of the 

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Approval Motion. 

5.3 Cooperation in Approval Process. The Parties shall cooperate with one another in 

taking whatever steps that are reasonably necessary or appropriate to obtain entry of the 

Approval Order, including causing counsel for such Parties to appear at any hearing on the 

Approval Motion and to advocate the Bankruptcy Court's entry of the Approval Order, provided 

that, nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to require Federal, its counsel or agents to 

perform any act or make any appearance that shall subject Federal to the jurisdiction of the 

Bankruptcy Court for any purpose whatsoever, other than to obtain, or be subject to, an Approval 

Order or an order extending the Approval Period, as provided for in Section 5.4 of this 

Agreement. Each Party covenants and agrees that after entry of the Approval Order it will not 

appeal the Approval Order or encourage or support any other Person's appeal of the Approval 

Order. 

5.4 Termination. If the Bankruptcy Court fails to enter the Approval Order within one 

hundred twenty ( 120) days of the date of the filing of the Approval Motion ("Approval Period"), 

then any Party may terminate the Agreement by issuing written notice of termination to all other 

Parties, provided, however, the Approval Period may be extended by mutual written agreement 

- 11 -
of the Parties or, in absence of mutual agreement, order of the Bankruptcy Court upon request by 

one or more of the Parties. If the Bankruptcy Court enters the Approval Order within the 

Approval Period, the Parties may not terminate the Agreement unless and until the Approval 

Order is reversed and such reversal becomes a Final Order. On or after the first date that any 

reversal order becomes a Final Order, any Party may terminate this Agreement by issuing written 

notice of termination to all other Parties. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 5.4, 

then this Agreement shall be of no force and effect except to the extent of the tolling provision in 

Section 5.4. The Parties agree that all statutes of limitation, statutes of repose, or timing defenses 

with respect to Insurance Claims that the Parties had against each other prior to the date of the 

Agreement are tolled from the date of the Agreement until fifteen (15) days after the date this 

Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 5.4. 

SECTION 6. MISCELLANEOUS. 

6.1 Stay of Bond Claim Lawsuit. By no later than the tenth (I Oth) business day after 

the date of the Agreement, the Parties will execute and file with the District Court the Stay 

Motion and the Stay Order. 

6.2 Dismissal of Bond Claim Lawsuit. By no later than the tenth (lOth) business day 

after CBG and FDIC-R receive confirmation that both (a) the Settlement Funds, and any interest 

thereon as provided for in Section 3.3 of the Agreement, have been transferred in accordance 

with Section 3.2 of the Agreement and such funds represent collected funds for banking purposes 

and (b) any attorneys' fees and expenses due to CBG or FDIC-R as provided for in Section 3.5 

of the Agreement, if any, have been received by CBG and FDIC-C and represent collected funds 

for banking purposes, the Parties will execute and submit to the District Court the Dismissal 

Order. 

- 12-
6.3 No Inference or Impact on CBG v. FDIC-R Lawsuits. No presumption or 

inference shall exist or anse as a result of this Agreement or actions taken in accordance 

herewith, with respect to any of the following: (a) the issue of ownership of the Settlement 

Funds in the CBG v. FDIC-R Lawsuits; and (b) the nature of the relationship and any obligation 

tlowing between the FDIC-R and CBG raised in the CBG v FDIC-R Lawsuits, including, 

without limitation, the existence or non-existence of (i) a debtor-creditor relationship between 

the FDIC-R and CBG; (ii) a constructive trust in favor of either the FDIC-R or CBG; or (iii) the 

nature or scope of any duties between the FDIC-R and CBG. 

6.4 No Impact or Effect on Account Orders. Nothing in this Agreement, including 

the fact that the Settlement Funds will be deposited into and held in the Insurance Proceeds 

Holding Account, shall alter or affect the Account Orders. 

6.5 Waiver of Subrogation by Federal. Without limiting the generality of the releases 

granted herein, Federal agrees to, and hereby docs, irrevocably waive any rights of subrogation, 

both legal and equitable, it may have under the Bonds relating to the Insurance Claims, including 

those subrogation rights which may arise from Federal's payment of the Settlement Funds, or 

involving the underlying properties or assets or claims involved in the Insurance Claims and all 

rights to recovery thereof; provided, however, that this waiver of subrogation rights docs not 

extend to or affect any Excluded Policies. Federal does not warrant the value of any right of 

subrogation it is waiving. 

6.6 No Admission of Liability. The undersigned Parties each acknowledges and 

agrees that the matters set forth in this Agreement constitute the settlement and compromise of 

the Insurance Claims, and that this Agreement is not an admission or evidence of any liability, 

coverage, wrongdoing, or responsibility on its part or on the part of any of those released 

- 13-
regarding any Claims nor is it intended to be, nor sha11 it be construed as, an interpretation of the 

Bonds or any other insurance policy. 

6.7 Cooperative Drafting. Parties to this Agreement have participated jointly in the 

negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. Accordingly, each Party agrees not to assert that 

any other Party is the so1c or principal drafter of the Agreement. The Parties also agree not to 

assert that any canon of construction applicable to sole or principal drafters should be applied 

against any Party. 

6.8 Counterparts; Electronic Signature. The Agreement may be executed in two or 

more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but together shall constitute one 

and the same instrument. A facsimile or an electronic mail copy of the signature of any Party 

shall have the same binding legal effect as an original signature. 

6.9 Binding Effect. Each of the undersigned Parties represents and warrants that he 

or she is authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of the respective Party, and that he or she 

has the full power and authority to bind such Party to each and every provision of this 

Agreement, subject to satisfaction of the Bankruptcy Condition. This Agreement shall be binding 

upon and inure to the benefit of the undersigned Parties and their respective successors and 

ass1gns. 

6.10 Learned Later Facts. Each Party understands, acknowledges and agrees that if 

any fact now believed to be true is found hereafter to be other than, or different from, that which 

is now believed, each expressly assumes the risk of such difference in fact and agrees that this 

Agreement sha11 and will remain effective notwithstanding any such difference in fact. 

6.11 Possible Unknown Losses. Each Party acknowledges it may have sustained 

damages, losses, fees, costs or expenses that arc presently unknown and unsuspected in 

- 14-
connection with the subject matter of the Bond Claim Lawsuit, which, if known or suspected, 

may have materially affected the Parties decision to enter into this Agreement, and that such 

damages, losses, fees, costs or expenses as the Party may have sustained might give rise to 

additional damages, losses, fees, costs or expenses in the future. Nevertheless, each Party 

acknowledges that the releases herein have been negotiated and agreed upon in light of such 

possible damages, losses, fees, costs or expenses, and each expressly waives any and all rights 

under any federal or state statute or law concerning any potential presently-unknown Insurance 

Claims. 

6.12 Limits on Admissibility. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall not be 

admissible in any other action or proceeding between the Parties except in the CBG v. FDIC-R 

Lawsuits or in any action or proceeding to approve the Agreement, resolve a dispute as to the 

Agreement, or enforce this Agreement. 

6.13 Notices. If any Party is required to g1ve notice to another Party under this 

Agreement, such notice shall be (i) delivered personally, (ii) sent by Federal Express (or another 

recognized overnight or two-day courier) requesting next or second business day delivery, (iii) 

sent by facsimile, or (iv) sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, 

return receipt requested. Any such notice shall be deemed given when (i) so delivered 

personally, (ii) if sent by express courier, one or two business days (as the case may be) 

following delivery to the courier, (iii) on the date sent by facsimile, with confirmation of 

transmission, if sent during normal business hours of the recipient, or, if not, then on the next 

business day, or (iv) if sent by certified or registered mail, five business days after the date of 

deposit in the United States mail to the respective address of the Party as set forth below, with 

copies sent to the persons indicated below: 

- 15-
To the FDIC-R: 

Charles B. Lee. Esq. 

Miller & Manin PLLC 

Suite 1000, Volunteer Building 

832 Georgia A venue 

Chattanooga. TN 37402-22R9 

Telecopy: (423) 321-1541 

and 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. as Receiver for Bank 

Thomas J. O'Brien, Esq. 

3501 Fairfax Drive, Room VS-E-7012 

Arlington, VA 22226-3500 

Telccopy: (703) 516-5067 

To The Colonial BancGroup, Inc.: 

Kevin O'Halloran, 

P. 0. Box 723657 

Atlanta, Georgia 3 I 139 

Telecopy: (404) 522-R409 

and 

Andy Campbell, Esq. 

Campbell, Guin, Williams, Guy & Gidicre, LLC 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1600 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Telecopy: (205) 383-2641 

To Federal Insurance Company: 

Matt J. Farley, Esq. 

Krebs, Farley & Pelleleri, PLLC 

400 Poydras Street, Suite 2500 

New Orleans, LA 70130 

Telecopy: (504) 229-3571 

and 

M. Patricia Duffy 

A VP-Fidelity Claims 

Chubb & Son, a division of Federal Ins. Co. 

15 Mountain View Road 

Warren, New Jersey 07059 

Telecopy: (90S) 903-5300 

- 16-
or to such other address as the recipient Party has specified by prior written. notice to the sending 

Party (or in the case of counsel, to such other readily ascertainable business address as such 

counsel may hereafter maintain). Jf more than one method for sending notice as set forth above is 

used, the earliest notice date established as set forth above shall control. 

6.14 Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and enforced 

according to applicable federal law, or in its absence, the laws of the State of Alabama. 

6.15 Entire Agreement and Amendments. This Agreement constitutes the entire 

agreement and understanding between and among the undersigned Parties concerning the 

settlement of the Bond Claim Lawsuit and any prior agreements or understandings between 

Federal, on the one hand, and CBG or the FDIC-R, on the other hand, are fully superseded by 

this Agreement; provided, however, that the obligations set forth in the Confidentiality Orders 

shall remain in effect. This Agreement does not supersede any agreements or understandings 

between the FDIC-R and CBG. The Parties acknow1cdge that, except as expressly set forth 

herein, no representations of any kind or character have been made to them by any of the other 

Parties to induce the execution of this Agreement. This Agreement may not be amended or 

modified except by another written instrument signed by the Party or Parties to be bound 

thereby, or by their respective authorized attorney(s) or other representative(s). 

6.16 Reasonable Cooperation. The undersigned Parties agree to cooperate in good 

faith to effectuate all the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including doing or causing 

their agents and attorneys to do whatever is reasonably necessary to effectuate the signing, 

delivery, execution, filing, recording, and entry of any documents necessary to perform the terms 

of this Agreement, provided that, nothing in this Agreement shaH be deemed to require that 

Federal, its counsel or agents perform any act or make any appearance that shall subject Federal 

- 17-
to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court for any purpose whatsoever, other than to obtain, or 

be subject to, an Approval Order or an order extending the Approval Period, as provided for in 

Section 5.4 of this Agreement. 

6.17 Advice of Counsel. Each Party hereby acknowledges that it has consulted with 

and obtained the advice of counsel prior to executing this Agreement, and that this Agreement 

has been explained to that Party by its counsel. Each of the Parties acknowledges and represents 

that it is entering into this Agreement knowingly and voluntarily and that this Agreement is a 

product of good faith negotiations between the Parties. 

6.18 Authorization. The Parties declare, warrant and represent that they have agreed to 

the terms of this Agreement. Each of the Parties represents and warrants that it is authorized to 

enter into this Agreement, subject to the Bankruptcy Condition being satisfied; that the execution 

and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of this transaction will not conflict with or 

result in any violation or default under any provision of its articles of incorporation, charter, bylaws or of any decree, statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation applicable to it; and that except 

as otherwise provided for herein no further consent, approval, order, authorization or filing with 

any governmental authority is required in connection with the execution and deli very of this 

Agreement or the consummation of the transactions described in this Agreement. 

6.19 Severability. If any provision, other than Sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 

4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8 5.1, 5.2, 5.4 and the subparts of each, arc held invalid or unenforceable in 

general or in application to any Party or circumstance, that provision shall be severed from the 

remainder of this Agreement, and the Agreement sha11 otherwise remain. in fu11 force and effect. 

Further if any of the provisions of the Sections enumerated in this Section 6.19, or the subparts 

of each, arc held invalid or unenforceable in general or in application to any Party or 

- 18-
circumstance the Parties may mutually agree, in writing, that the provision shall be severed from 

the remainder of this Agreement or modified, and the Agreement shall otherwise remain in full 

force and effect. If no such agreement is reached then the Agreement in its entirety will be 

deemed invalid and unenforceable. 

[Signature Page Follows-- The Remainder Of This Page Intentionally Left Blank] 

- 19-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed 

by each of them or their duly authorized representatives on the dates hereinafter subsaihed. 

Date: 

Title: 

~tS~It reovNSC L. ·--·--·-·-··-·----

Date: ___________ _ 

Title: ________ _ 

Date: ____________ _ 

Title: ____________ _ 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, as Receiver of Colonial 

Bank 

(~)(§) 

'CJ 

Print Name: __ ftfJ2.~A$ .. _;f. 0 "iS~t e 1\.J 

THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, TNC. 

By: __________ _ 

Print Name: ___ _ 

:FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

By: ____________ _ 

Print Name: ------------
IN WITNESS WHEREOP, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed 

by each of them or their duly authorized representatives on the dates hereinafter subscribed. 

Date: --------------------------

Title: ______________ _ 

Date: _ __:_1_ .... _1_,_-_:2_tJ_I_~---

----=-, Title: ~ 

Date: __________________ _ 

Title: _________________ _ 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, as Receiver of Colonial 

Bank 

By: ____________ __ 

Print Name: _____________ _ 

THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP . 

By:_.__ ___ ....,..--------:-~..,...---' 

Print Name: __ ~_--'l'-t.J __ O-=--_' -~---------=--

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

By: __________________ _ 

Print Name: ______________ _ 
Date: ____ _ _ _______ _ 

Titk: _ _ _ ___ _ _____ _ _ 

I )ate: 

Titk: - --- --- - - ------- - ---

Dal\.:: ~ ... :f?~~ rl\ "'_r I\ )-.0 \'"'{ -t- I 

Tit k: _ _ J_· ---=)_-· _\ _/ _\_:J _ ____ _ _ _ 

ITDUC\1 . DLPOSIT 1\:Sl.!R:\:\CI ·. 

COR POR:\ TIO\!. as Rcc~i' cr l)t' Cllhlnial 

I lank 

Hy: _ _______ ____ _ _ _ 

Print ~amc : -------- -----

Till ·. COLO\!i\1. B:\\CG ROl 'J>. 1'\C. 

H' : _ ___________ _ 

Print N;11nc : 

------- ----- -----

(b)(6) 
Exhibit A 
In re: 

Ul\'ITED STATES BAl\'KRUPTCY COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

Chapter II 

THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC., Case No. 09-32303 (DHW) 

Debtor. 

DEBTOR'S MOTIOI\ PURSUANT TO BA~KRUPTCY RULE 9019 

TO APPROVE SETTLEMEl\'T Al\'D RELEASE AGREEMENT AMONG 

THE FDIC-RECEIVER, THE DEBTOR AND FEDERAL I~SURA~CE COMPAl\'Y 

PURSUANT TO LBR 9007-1, THIS MOTION WILL BE TAKEN UNDER 

ADVISEMENT BY THE COURT AND MAY BE GRANTED UNLESS A PARTY IN 

INTEREST FILES A RESPONSE WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SERVICE. 

RESPONSES MUST BE FILED WITH THE CLERK AND SERVED UPON THE 

MOVING PARTY. RESPONSES MUST BE FILED ELECTRONICALLY WITH THE 

CLERK OR BY U.S. MAIL ADDRESSED TO THE CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY 

COURT, ONE CHURCH STREET, MONTGOMERY ALABAMA 36104. 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. (the "Debtor"), by this motion (the "Motion"), seeks entry 

of an order pursuant to Section 105 of Title II of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy 

Code"), Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankmptcy Procedure (the "Bankruptcy Rules"), and 

Rule 9007-l of the Local Rules of this Court, approving the Settlement and Release Agreement 

attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Settlement Agreement") among the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation, as receiver for Colonial Bank (the "FDIC-Receiver"), the Debtor and Federal 

Insurance Company (''Federal"). 

In support of this Motion, the Debtor states and shows as follows: 

308525')_ 4 
Background 

l. The Debtor is a Delaware corporation that had its headquarters in Montgomery, 

Alabama and was the parent corporation of Colonial Bank. By order of the Alabama State 

Banking Department dated August 14, 2009, Colonial Bank was closed and the FDIC-Receiver 

was appointed its receiver. By operation of law, upon its appointment the FDIC-Rcccivcr 

succeeded to the rights, titles, powers and privileges of Colonial Bank. 12 U.S.C. § 

1821 (d)(2)(A). 

2. On August 25, 2009 (the ''Petition Date"), the Debtor filed a petition under 

Chapter ll of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle 

District of Alabama (the "Bankruptcy Court"). On June 3, 20 l I, the Bankruptcy Court 

confirmed the Debtor's second amended plan of liquidation (the "Plan"). The Debtor's affairs 

and disposition of its assets are now overseen by a plan trustee under the Plan. 

Overview of Dispute 

3. The Debtor and Colonial Bank are ·• Assureds" under and as defined in the 

following insurance policies issued by Federal: (i) Financial Institution Bond No.L..I ___ ..;;;·······;;;ljl(b){4.) 

(b)(4) .. D effective from March l, 2009 to March l, 2010 ("Form A"); (ii) Financial Institution Bond 

(b)(4) .HNoJ.··HHH !effective from July 16, 2009 to July 16,2010 ("Form B"); and (iii) Financial 

Institution Electronic and Computer Crime Policy No.I H .JeffectiveHJromM.archJ,JI::>1(4.) 

2009 to March l, 20 l 0 (the "Electronic and Computer Crime Policy"; and together with Forms A 

and B, the "Bonds"). 

4. The Debtor and the FDIC-Rcceivcr determined Losses that they believed to be 

covered under the Bonds. The Debtor and the FDIC-Receiver asserted that the Bonds provided 

coverage as follows: (i) Form A provided coverage up to the policy limit of liability of $25 

2 
mil1ion; (ii) Form B provided coverage up to the policy limit of liability of $500,000; and the 

Electronic and Computer Crime Policy provided coverage up to the policy limit of liability of 

$25 million. Thus, the Debtor and the FDIC-Reeeivcr believed that the total coverage under the 

Bonds amounted to $50.5 million. As discussed below, Federal disputed this belief, contending, 

among other things, the maximum amount of insurance coverage at issue was $25 million, and, 

in any event, that there is no coverage for the claimed Losses. 

5. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Federal will pay $30 million in settlement 

of the daims which amount will be deposited into an insurance proceeds holding account 

pursuant to two applicable orders of the Bankruptcy Court pending the resolution of the FDICReceiver's and the Debtor's disputes over the ownership of these funds. [See Bankr. Doc. Nos. 

972 & 10201. 

A. Notice of Loss; Commencement of Bond Claim Lawsuit 

6. Notice of loss was given to Federal in 2009, followed by the submission of sworn 

proofs of loss to Federal in 2010. The Debtor and the FDIC-Receiver alleged that the losses set 

forth in the notice of loss and proofs of loss constituted recoverable losses under the Bonds up to 

the full aggregate policy limits of liability of the Bonds. 

7. Federal did not pay to either the FDIC-Receiver or the Debtor their claimed losses 

under the Bonds. 

8. On July 29, 2011, the Debtor and the FDIC-Receiver filed suit against Federal in 

the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (the "District Court") for 

breach of contract as a result of Federal's alleged failure to pay claims under the Bonds for 

covered losses. See FDIC, et al.. v. Federal Insurance Company, Case No. 2:11-cv-00610 (M.D. 

Ala.) (the "Bond Claim Lawsuit"). 

3 
9. Federal answered the complaint in the Bond Claim Lawsuit on September 16, 

2011. Federal also asserted counterclaims for reformation against the FDIC-Receiver and the 

Debtor, seeking to amend an alleged scrivener's error in one of the Bonds. The FDIC-Receiver 

and the Debtor denied that Federal was entitled to the relief sought in the counterclaims. 

10. Subsequently, the parties engaged in preliminary fact discovery, and deposed one 

witness. 

B. Ongoing Discovery and Motion Practice; Mediations of Bond Claim Lawsuit 

11. While discovery proceeded, the District Coun ordered that the panies mediate 

their dispute. This mediation took place over two days in May of 2012. The mediation did not 

result in a settlement. 

12. Thereafter, in February of 2013, the parties participated in a second mediation of 

their disputes before a United States Magistrate Judge. This second mediation also did not result 

in a settlement of the Bond Claim Lawsuit. 

13. On March 13, 2013, Federal moved to dismiss the Debtor as a plaintiff in the 

case, asserting a purported lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Debtor opposed the motion to 

dismiss. The District Court then suspended dates related to the Bond Claim Lawsuit pending 

resolution of the motion to dismiss. 

14. After conducting additional discovery, including the deposition of two 

representatives of Federal, and engaging in motion practice, the parties have now reached a 

settlement of the Bond Claim Lawsuit subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, as described in 

further detail below and as specifically set forth in the Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit 

A. 

4 
Procedural Overview 

15. The Settlement Agreement does not dispose of, or in any way impact, the FDICRcccivcr's and the Debtor's disputes over the ownership of the proceeds to be paid by Federal in 

connection with the settlement of the Bond Claim Lawsuit. See Settlement Agreement, Section 

6.3. These ownership disputes arc pending in the District Court. Sec The Colonial BancGroup, 

Inc. v. FDIC, Case No. 2: lO-cv-00198 (M.D. Ala.); and In re: The Colonial BancGroup, Inc., 

Case No. 2: 10-cv-00409 (M.D. Ala.). Neither the FDIC-Rccciver nor the Debtor can predict at 

this time when these ownership disputes will be resolved, either by final judicial determination 

or settlement. 

16. If the Settlement Agreement is approved by this Court by a final order, Federal 

will pay $30 million which will be deposited in the Regions Bank depository account (the 

"Insurance Proceeds Holding Account") established by two orders of the Bankruptcy Court (the 

"Account Orders") [Bankr. Doc. Nos. 972 & 10201. The release of the $30 million in sctt1cmcnt 

proceeds from the Insurance Proceeds Holding Account to either the FDIC-Receiver or the 

Debtor is governed by the Account Orders. Sec Account Orders, Doc. No. 972, 9! 5; Doc. No. 

1020, 'I 6. The Settlement Agreement does not alter the Account Orders in any way. See 

Settlement Agreement, Section 6.4. 

17. The Debtor encourages parties in interest to review the Settlement Agreement and 

the Account Orders in full, as the terms of those documents control over this overview. Even if 

the Debtor prevails over the FDIC-Receiver in the ownership disputes with respect to proceeds 

of the Settlement Agreement, the Account Orders permit both the Debtor and the FDIC-Rcccivcr 

to reimbursement of reasonable fees and expenses for professional services rendered to them and 

expenses incurred by such professionals on behalf of them (the "Professional Expenses") in 

5 
certain instances. Sec Account Orders, Doc. No. 1020, ~I 6(a)-(b). The Debtor and the FDICReceiver are each entitled to reimbursement of Professional Expenses from proceeds of the 

Settlement Agreement relating to the preparation and submission of the proof of loss, any 

subsequent submission to Federal or the pursuit and prosecution of claims relating to the Bonds, 

subject to the terms of the Account Orders. However, Professional Expenses related to the 

question of ownership of proceeds of the Bonds are not subject to reimbursement from proceeds 

of the Settlement Agreement. Any dispute regarding reimbursement wi11 be resolved by 

mediation or, if mediation does not resolve the dispute, by the Bankruptcy Court. 

IS. Thus, even if the Debtor prevails in its ownership dispute with the FDICReceiver, the Debtor may, and likely will, receive less than $30 million. The FDIC-Receiver's 

position is that all of the funds arc property of the FDIC-Rcceiver subject to the rights under the 

Account Orders. It is difficult at this time to ascertain with any certainty how much of the 

proceeds will be devoted to the reimbursement of Professional Expenses in accordance with the 

Account Orders. 

Jurisdiction and Venue 

19. Under Section 13.1 of the Plan, the Court retained jurisdiction over a number of 

matters relating to the Debtor's Chapter l I case, including jurisdiction to resolve estate causes of 

action such as the Bond Claim Lawsuit. Accordingly, the Court has jurisdiction over this Motion 

pursuant to 2S U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. The Motion is a core proceeding pursuant to 2S U.S.C. 

§ 157(b). Venue of this Chapter 11 case and this Motion in this district is appropriate pursuant to 

2S U.S.C. §§ l40S and 1409. The predicates for the relief sought herein arc Section 105 of the 

Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019. 

6 
Basis for Settlement Agreement and Relief Requested 

20. Subject to Court approval, the Debtor, the FDIC-Receiver and Federal have now 

determined that it is in their mutual best interests to reach a settlement of the Bond Claim 

Lawsuit. Without conceding the merits of any claim or argument asserted by any other party, the 

Debtor, the FDIC-Receiver and Federal each has agreed to the settlement described below in 

order to avoid the risk, delay and expense that would arise from litigation of their disputes to 

resolution. Pursuant to Section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019, the 

Debtor respectfully requests that this Court approve the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 

21. The Settlement Agreement sets forth and controls the terms of the settlement. All 

interested parties should review carefully the precise terms of the Settlement Agreement for a 

full and accurate understanding of the settlement. In the event of any inconsistency between the 

Settlement Agreement and the summary contained below, the terms of the Settlement Agreement 

govern and controL However, for the convenience of the Court and parties in interest, the 

Debtor has attempted to summarize the main components of the proposed settlement: 

(a) By no later than the tenth (lOth) business day following the date that the 

order approving the Settlement Agreement becomes final, Federal will pay 

$30 million which will be wire transferred by Federal into the Insurance 

Proceeds Holding Account; 

(b) Effective upon payment by Federal of the Settlement Funds, the FDICReceiver and the Debtor will release Federal from any and all claims 

arising out of the Bond or the Bond Claim Lawsuit (as more specifically 

defined in the Settlement Agreement as the ''Insurance Claims"), but not 

any "Excluded Claims" (as defined in the Settlement Agreement); 

(c) Upon the FDIC-Receiver and the Debtor's release of Federal, Federal will 

release the FDIC-Receiver and the Debtor from any ''Insurance Claims," 

but not any "Excluded Claims"; and 

(d) By no later than the tenth (lOth) business day after the FDIC-Receiver and 

the Debtor receive confirmation of its receipt of the settlement funds and 

any other funds due and owing to them by Federal under the Settlement 

Agreement, the parties will execute and submit to the District Court a 

7 
stipulated order of dismissal of the Bond Claim Lawsuit in substantially 

the form attached to the Settlement Agreement. 

Applicable Law 

22. Under Bankruptcy Rule 9019, the Court has the authority to approve a 

compromise of a controversy or dispute. See Protective Comm. for Independent Stockholders of 

TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson, 390 U.S. 414, 424 (1968); Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Air 

Line Pilots' Ass'n Int'l. (In re Continental Airlines. Inc.), 907 F.2d 1500, 1508 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Moreover, compromises arc favored in bankruptcy. Myers v. Martin (In rc Martin), 91 F.3d 389, 

393 (3rd Cir. 1996). Whether to approve a proposed settlement is a matter within the sound 

discretion of the bankruptcy court. In re Munford, Inc., 97 F. 3d 449, 455 (lith Cir. 1996). 

23. The Courts of Appeals generally agree that, in deciding whether to approve a 

proposed settlement, a bankruptcy court should evaluate the following: 

(a) the probability of success in litigation, with due consideration for the 

uncertainty of the facts and the law; 

(b) the difficulties, if any, to be encountered in collecting on a judgment; 

(c) the complexity and likely duration of the litigation and any attendant 

expense, inconvenience, and delay; and 

(d) the paramount interest of the creditors and a proper deference to their 

reasonable views. 

See In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544, 1549 (lith Cir. 1990) (internal citations omitted); 

Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. United Cos. Fin. Corp.(ln re Foster Mortgage Corp.), 68 F.3d 

914, 917 (5th Cir. 1995); Jeffrey v. Desmond, 70 F.3d 183, 185 (lst Cir. 1995). These criteria 

essentially require the Court to ·'assess and balance the value of the claim that is being 

compromised against the value to the estate of the compromise proposal." Myers, 91 F.3d at 

393. In other words, bankmptcy courts are charged with determining whether the proposed 

8 
settlement is fair and equitable and in the best interests of the bankruptcy estate. Depoister v. 

Mary M. Holloway Found., 36 F.3d 582, 586 (7th Cir. 1994 ). 

24. In evaluating a proposed settlement of a matter that has not proceeded to 

judgment, the bankruptcy court is not required to hold a full evidentiary hearing or even to 

conduct a "mini-trial." In re Cajun Elec. Power Coop., 119 F.3d 349, 356 (5th Cir. 1997) 

(internal citations omitted). 

25. Bankruptcy courts need not even determine that the settlement constitutes the 

"best result obtainable." Tri-State Fin., LLC v. Lovald, 525 F.3d 649, 654 (8th Cir. 2008) 

(internal citations omitted). Rather, in taking into account the aforementioned factors, 

bankruptcy courts "need only determine that the settlement does not fall below the lowest point 

in the range of reasonableness." Id. (internal punctuation omitted). The Debtor believes that the 

proposed settlement is reasonable, fair and equitable and satisfies the standards for approval of a 

settlement. 

Basis for Relief Requested 

26. The scttlcment set forth in the Settlement Agreement is in the best interests of the 

Debtor and its estate for the following reasons: 

(a) Federal has strenuously resisted the FDIC-Receivcr's and the Debtor's 

efforts to establish that the aggregate policy limits of the Bonds equals 

$50.5 million, rather than approximately $25 million as Federal has 

contended. This contested issue alone could cap recovery at a level below 

the scttlcment amount if ruled upon in favor of FederaL 

(b) Further, Federal has consistently maintained that, regardless of the 

aggregate policy limits of the Bonds, no coverage exists for the loss 

9 
claimed by the FDIC-Receivcr and the Debtor. Federal alleges that none 

of the conduct detailed in the notice of loss and proofs of loss triggered 

coverage under the Bonds, and, in any event, coverage is barred by 

multiple exclusions and conditions in the Bonds. By way of illustration, 

Federal asserted Sixty-One (61) defenses in answer to the Bond Claim 

Lawsuit. Among Federal's asserted defenses are that, under the express 

terms of the Bonds, coverage automatica11y terminated before discovery of 

the loss as to the employees at the heart of the schemes underlying the loss 

(in 2002) and later as to the totality of coverage provided under the Bonds. 

(c) By settling this matter in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, the 

FDJC-Rccciver and the Debtor avoid the expense and risk attendant to 

litigation of the Bond Claim Lawsuit, and the possibility that Federal 

could prevail on any of its affirmative defenses or counterclaims. 

Notice 

27. The Debtor proposes to give notice of the Motion by CM/ECF notification to 

those parties registered as of issuance of filing. In light of the nature of the relief requested, the 

Debtor submits that no other or further notice need be provided. 

WHEREFORE, the Debtor respectfully requests that this Court enter an order 

substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit B, and grant such other and further relief as 

this Court deems just and proper. 

10 
Dated: September __ , 2014 

/s/ Rufus T. Dorsey, IV 

C. Edward Dobbs, Esq. 

Rufus T. Dorsey IV, Esq. 

Parker, Hudson, Rainier & Dobbs LLP 

1500 Marquis Two Tower 

285 Peachtree Center Avenue, N.E. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 

(404) 420-5550 

!~l!~l t l 

Attorneys for Debtor 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 

/s/ Andrew P. Campbell 

Andrew P. Campbell, Esq. 

Campbell, Guin, Williams, Guy & Gidiere, 

LLC 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1600 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tel: (205) 224-0750 

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••lm••••••• 

11 

Special Litigation Counsel for Debtor 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 
Exhibit A 

Settlement Agreement 
Exhibit B 

Proposed Order 

13 
In re: 

Ul\'ITED STATES BAl\'KRUPTCY COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

Chapter II 

THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC., Case No. 09-32303 (DHW) 

Debtor. 

ORDER GRAI\"TING DEBTOR'S MOTION PURSUA:"'T TO BA:"'KRUPTCY 

RULE 9019 TO APPROVE SETTLEMEI\"T A~D RELEASE AGREEMEI\"T Al\101\"G 

THE FDIC-RECEIVER, THE DEBTOR AND FEDERAL I~SURA~CE COMPAl\'Y 

This matter is before the Court upon the motion (the '~Motion") of The Colonial 

BancGroup, Inc. (the "Debtor") for entry of an order pursuant to Section I 05 of Title II of the 

United States Code (the ''Bankruptcy Code"), Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 

Procedure (the "Bankruptcy Rules"), and Rule 9007-1 of the Local Rules of this Court, 

approving the Seu/ernent and Release Agreernent (the "Settlement Agreement") among the 
Debtor, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Colonial Bank (the "FDICReceiver") and Federal Insurance Company ("Federa1"). 1 

NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the Motion and all of the proceedings before this 

Court, and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, [and no objection to 

the Motion having been raised,} it is hereby: 

ORDERED that the Motion is granted [, all objections to the Motion having been 

withdrawn, settled or overruled}; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is approved and authority is granted for the 

performance of al1 of the obligations thereunder; and it is further 

ORDERED that notice of the Motion as provided therein shall be deemed good and 

sufficient notice thereof; and it is further 

ORDERED that this Order shall be immediately effective and the stay otherwise 

provided for in Rule 6004(h) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, to the extent 

applicable, is hereby waived; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine al1 matters 

arising from the implementation of this Order. 

###END OF ORDER### 

1 Capitalized terms used. but not otherwise defined, herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Motion. 

2 
Submitted by: 

Is/ Rufus T. Dorsey. IV 

C. Edward Dobbs, Esq. 

Rufus T. Dorsey IV, Esq. 

Parker, Hudson, Rainier & Dobbs LLP 

1500 Marquis Two Tower 

285 Peachtree Center Avenue, N.E. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 

(404) 420-5550 

(b)(6).H .. l I 

(b)(6) ................ 1 I 

Attomeys for Debtor 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 

Is/ Andrew P. Campbell 

Andrew P. Campbell, Esq. 

Campbell, Guin, Williams, Guy & Gidiere, 

LLC 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1600 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tel: (205) 224-0750 

................................................................................... 1 (b)(6) ....__ _______ __,····· ................................................................ .. 

3 

Special Litigation Counsel for Debtor 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 
Exhibit B 
In re: 

Ul\'ITED STATES BAl\'KRUPTCY COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

Chapter II 

THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC., Case No. 09-32303 (DHW) 

Debtor. 

ORDER GRAI\"TING DEBTOR'S MOTIOI\" PURSUANT TO BA:"'KRUPTCY 

RULE 9019 TO APPROVE SETTLEMEI\"T A~D RELEASE AGREEMEI\"T AMOI\"G 

THE FDIC-RECEIVER, THE DEBTOR AND FEDERAL I~SURA~CE COMPAl\'Y 

This matler is before the Court upon the motion (the "Motion") of The Colonial 

BancGroup, Inc. (the "Debtor") for entry of an order pursuant to Section I 05 of Title II of the 

United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 

Procedure (the "Bankruptcy Rules"), and Rule 9007-1 of the Local Rules of this Court, 

approvmg the SeTTlement and Release Agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") among the 

Debtor, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Colonial Bank (the "FDICReceiver") and Federal Insurance Company ("Federal"). 1 

1 Capitalized terms. used, but not otherwise. defined, herein shall. have the meaning ascribed to. them in the. Motion. 
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the Motion and all of the proceedings before this 

Court, and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, [and no objection to 

the Motion having been raised,} it is hereby: 

ORDERED that the Motion is granted [, all objections to the Motion having been 

withdrawn, settled or overruled}; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement is approved and authority is granted for the 

performance of all of the obligations thereunder; and it is further 

ORDERED that notice of the Motion as provided therein shall be deemed good and 

sufficient notice thereof; and it is further 

ORDERED that this Order shall be immediately effective and the stay otherwise 

provided for in Rule 6004(h) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, to the extent 

applicable, is hereby waived; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters 

arising from the implementation of this Order. 

###END OF ORDER### 
Submitted by: 

Is/ Rufus T. Dorsey. IV 

C. Edward Dobbs, Esq. 

Rufus T. Dorsey IV, Esq. 

Parker, Hudson, Rainier & Dobbs LLP 

1500 Marquis Two Tower 

285 Peachtree Center Avenue, N.E. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 

(404) 420-5550 

/s/ Andrew P. Campbell 

Andrew P. Campbell, Esq. 

Campbell, Guin, Williams, Guy & Gidiere, 

LLC 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1600 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tel: (205) 224-0750 

~~~~:~ " " =t= l I .......................................................................................... ······················L------------' ···················································· 

Attomeys for Debtor 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 

Special Litigation Counsel for Debtor 

The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 
Exhibit C 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, as Receiver for 

COLONIAL BANK, and THE 

COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL ACTION FILE 

NO.2: ll-CV-610-MHT-WC 

----------------------------- ) 

CONSENT DISMISSAL ORDER 

Upon consideration of the joint motion of the parties to dismiss this action with prejudice, 

it is ORDERED that: 

l. The Motion is GRANTED as provided herein; 

2. All claims and counterclaims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 

3. Each party shall bear its own costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses of litigation; 

4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over any and all disputes related to the parties' 

Settlement and Release Agreement, including the enforcement thereof; and 

5. With the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and as 

indicated below, such disputes arc referred to United States Magistrate Judge Wallace 

Capel, Jr., or, in the event of his unavailability, another United States Magistrate Judge of 

this Court, to be assigned randomly by the Clerk of Court, to conduct any and all 

proceedings related to such disputes, including any trial and entry of a final judgment, 
with direct review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, if an 

appeal is filed. 

6. A11 other relief not expressly granted herein is hereby denied. 

Done this __ day of _______ , 2014 

Consented to by: 

By: lsi Charles B. Lee 

Charles B. Lee 

MILLER & MARTIN PLLC 

1180 W. Peachtree Street, NW, Suite 2100 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Tel: (404) 962-6100 

Fax: (404) 962-6300 

And 

By: Is/Dennis R. Bailey 

Dennis R. Bailey 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON & 

GARRETT, PC 

Post Office Box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

Tel: (334)206-3234 

Fax: (3 34 )4R 1-0031 

Attorneys for the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Cmporation as Recei~'er.f()r Colonial Bank 

3319090_6 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

By: Is/ Matt J. Farley 

Matt J. Farley 

KREBS, FARLEY & PELLETERI, PLLC 

400 Poydras Street, Suite 2500 

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 

Tel: (504) 299-3570 

Fax: (504) 299-3582 

And 

By: Is/Robert David Segall 

Robert David Segall 

COPELAND FRANCO SCREWS & GILL 

PO Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347 

Tel: (334) 834-1180 

Fax: (334) 834-3172 

Attomeysfor Federal insurance Company 

By: lsi AndrewS. Campbell 

Andrew P. Campbell, Esq. 

CAMPBELL, GUIN, WILLIAMS, GUY 

& GIDIERE, LLC 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1600 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tel: (205) 224-0750 

Attorneys.for Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 
Exhibit D 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, as Receiver for COLONIAL 

BANK, and THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, 

INC., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, 

V. 2: ll-cv-0061 0-MHT -WC 

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

JOINT MOTION FORST A Y 

All parties, the FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for 

Colonial Bank, THE COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC. ("BancGroup") and FEDERAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, (collectively the "Parties") jointly move the Court to stay this matter 

in its entirety pending the ruling by the bankruptcy court on BancGroup's request for approval of 

the Settlement and Release Agreement ("Agreement") which Agreement is attached hereto as 

''Exhibit A." As grounds for this request, the Parties jointly state as follows: 

I. On May 29, 2013, the Court entered an Order (Doc. No. liS) staying all deadlines and 

the dates for pretrial and trial in the uniform scheduling order. 

2. The Parties have entered into an Agreement which provides for the settlement and 

dismissal of all claims and counterclaims in this action. 

3. The Agreement requires the approval of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Middle District of Alabama in the case styled In re: The Colonial BancGroup, Inc., No. 

09-32303 (DHW), U.S.B.C., M.D. Ala. (the "Bankruptcy Court"), because BancGroup 
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter II of the Bankruptcy Code in the 

Bankruptcy Court and, as a party to the Agreement, its authorization to enter into the 

Agreement is subject to the Bankruptcy Court approving the Agreement. The 

Agreement, to the extent approved by the Bankruptcy Court and performed by the Parties 

thereto, requires the submission to the Court of a dismissal order in the form attached to 

the Agreement. 

4. Pending the Bankruptcy Court's ruling on the Agreement, the Parties respectfully request 

that this matter be stayed in its entirety. The requested stay is in funherance of the 

proposed settlement and will conserve judicial resources and expenses pending the 

review of the Bankruptcy Court. The Agreement and approval documents have already 

been filed by BancGroup in the Bankruptcy Court and the applicable bankruptcy 

procedure of "negative notice" applicable thereto (Local Bankruptcy Rule 9007 -I) 

requires noticed parties to file written objections to the settlement, if any arc to be 

asserted, within 21 days of service of the motion, thus assuring that the issue will be 

heard expeditiously by the Bankruptcy Court. 

5. A draft form of order is attached hereto as "Exhibit B". 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Parties jointly request and move the 

Court to stay this matter in its entirety. 

Charles B. Lee and Dennis R. Bailey (Counsel for Plaintiff FDIC-Rcceiver), Andrew S. 

Campbell (Counsel for Plaintiff Colonial BancGroup, Inc.) and Matt J. Farley and Robert David 

Segall (Counsel for the Defendant), have consented to the usc of their c-signaturcs on this 

document. 
Respectfully Submitted 

By: Is/ Charles B. Lee 

Charles B. Lee 

MILLER & MARTIN, PLLC 

1180 W. Peachtree Street, NW, Suite 2100 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Tel: (404) 962-6100 

Fax: (404) 962-6300 

And 

By: Is/Dennis R. Bailey 

Dennis R. Bailey 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON & 

GARRETT, PC 

Post Office Box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

Tel: (334)206-3234 

Fax: (334 )481-0031 

Attorneys for the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank 

Dated: --------

By: Is/ Matt J. Farley 

Matt J. Farley 

KREBS, FARLEY & PELLETERI, PLLC 

400 Poydras Street, Suite 2500 

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 

Tel: (504) 299-3570 

Fax: (504) 299-3582 

And 

And 

By: Is/Robert David Segall 

Robert David Segall 

COPELAND FRANCO SCREWS & GILL 

PO Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347 

Tel: (334) 834-1180 

Fax: (334) 834-3172 

Attorneys.for Federal Insurance Company 

By: Is/ AndrewS. Campbell 

AndrewS. Campbell 

CAMPBELL, GUIN, WILLIAMS, GUY & 

GIDIERE, LLC 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1600 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tel: (205) 224-0750 

Attorneys.for Colonial BancGroup, Inc. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the JOINT MOTION FOR STAY, a copy of the foregoing was 

filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court's electronic filing 

system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. All other parties, if any, will be 

served by regular U.S. Mail, electronic mail, and/or facsimile. Parties may access this filing 

through the Court's electronic filing system. 

/s/ Charles B. Lee 

Charles B. Lee 
Exhibit E 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, as Receiver for 

Colonial Bank, and THE 

COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiffs, 2: ll-cv-00610-MHT 

V. 

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

CONSENT ORDER STAYING CASE 

This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion For Stay pending the ruling of the 

bankruptcy court on the Parties proposed Settlement and Release Agreement, a copy of which is 

attached to the Joint Motion as Exhibit A. 

It is ORDERED that this case is stayed in its entirety pending further order of the Court. 

DONE, this the __ day of _____ , 2014 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
Consented to by: 

By: /s/ Charles B. Lee 

Charles B. Lee 

MILLER & MARTIN, PLLC 

1180 W. Peachtree Street, NW, Suite 2100 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309 

Tel: (404) 962-6100 

Fax: (404) 962-6300 

And 

By: Is/Dennis R. Bailey 

Dennis R. Bailey 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON & 

GARRETT, PC 

Post Office Box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

Tel: (334)206-3234 

Fax: (334)481-0031 

Auorneysfor the Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank 

3319294_5 

By: /s/ Matt J. Farley 

Matt J. Farley 

KREBS, FARLEY & PELLETERI, PLLC 

400 Poydras Street, Suite 2500 

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 

Tel: (504) 299-3570 

Fax: (504) 299-3582 

And 

By: /s/Robe11 David Segall 

Robert David Segall 

COPELAND FRANCO SCREWS & GILL 

PO Box 347 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0347 

Tel: (334) 834-1180 

Fax: (314) 834-3172 

Auomeys.f(Jr Federal Insurance Company 

By: /s/ Andrew S. Campbell 

AndrewS. Campbell 

CAMPBELL, GUIN, WILLIAMS, GUY & 

GIDIERE, LLC 

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1600 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Tel: (205) 224-0750 

Fax: (205) 383-2641 

Auorneysfor Colonial BancGroup, Inc.