alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
 
 FORM
8-K
 
 CURRENT
REPORT
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
 SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 March 4,
2010
 Date
of report (Date of earliest event reported)
  
 
 
 Petroleum
Development Corporation
 Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter
 
 Nevada
              0-7246
              95-2636730State
      or Other Jurisdiction
                of
      Incorporation
              Commission
                File
      Number
              IRS
      Employer
                Identification
      Number
 
 1775
Sherman Street, Suite 3000, Denver, CO 80203
 Address
of Principal Executive Offices
 
 303-860-5800
 Registrant's
telephone number, including area code
 
 Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing
 obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction
A.2. below):
 
 [    
      ]
              Written
      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)[    
      ]
              Soliciting
      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a-12)[    
      ]
              Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14d-2(b))[    
      ]
              Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.13e-4(c))
 
 
 No
Change
 Former
Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report
 
 
 
 Item
7.01.                      Regulation
FD Disclosure
 Item
2.02.                      Results
of Operations and Financial Conditions
 
 The
following information is furnished pursuant to both Item 7.01 and
2.02.
 
 The
Company has previously scheduled a teleconference call with investors on
Thursday, March 4, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. MST to discuss 2009 fourth quarter and
year-end results.  A copy of the slide presentation is attached by
reference as Exhibit 99.1.
 
 Information
included in this report, and in Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (The
Exchange Act), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in the filing.
 
 EXHIBIT
INDEX
 
 Item
9.01.                        Financial
Statements and Exhibits
 
 Exhibit
                No.
              
              Description99.1
              
              EARNINGS
      CALL PRESENTATION:
                PETROLEUM
      DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2009 FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR-END
      TELECONFERENCE,  March 4, 2010
 
 SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
 
 
 PETROLEUM
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
 
 Date:
              March
      4, 2010By:
              /s/
      Richard W. McCulloughRichard
      W. McCulloughChairman
      and CEO
| **Revenue Recognition Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition (Details) $ in Millions** | 3 Months Ended |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract]**                                                               |           |
| Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition, Explanation of Change                          | $ 2.5          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Represents the quantification of the effect of adopting the new accounting standard or change in accounting principle expected by the entity to have a significant effect on the entity's financial statements.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NewAccountingPronouncementOrChangeInAccountingPrincipleEffectOfAdoptionQuantification**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_RevenueFromContractWithCustomerAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
November 5, 2010














Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, DC  20549-7561








Commissioners:





We have read Item 4.01(a) of PDC 2002-D Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2010, and are in agreement with the statements made in the second, third, fourth, and fifth paragraphs.  We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statements made in the first paragraph.








/s/ Schneider Downs & Co., Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           564,922
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 12,188,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,880,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              14,984,873
<PP&E>                                       129,152,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                41,124,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               140,915,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13,172,345
<BONDS>                                       21,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      43,378,440
<OTHER-SE>                                    43,912,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 140,915,945
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              27,968,966
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 18,875,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               553,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               13,587,683
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,202,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            8,385,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,385,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.642
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) of Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2014, I, David G. Burke, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  October 28, 2015DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.By:/s/ David G. BurkeDavid G. BurkeTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Carlos Castro SEGURA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71882.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*67Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 19, 2011.

Simon Salinas, Esquire, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Janette L. Allen, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Carlos Castro Segura, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the grant of the government’s motion to change venue. *Baires v. INS,*856 F.2d 89, 92 (9th Cir.1988). We review de novo whether the statutory right to counsel was violated, *Mendoza-Mazariegos v. Mukasey,*509 F.3d 1074, 1079 (9th Cir.2007), and claims of due process violations, *Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion or violate due process by granting the government’s motion to change venue where the government demonstrated good cause and Segura did not oppose the motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.20(b) (IJ may grant a motion for change of venue where good cause shown); *see also Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error to establish a due process violation).

The IJ did not deny Segura his right to counsel. The record indicates that Segura knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel at his February 23, 2006, hearing. *See Tawadrus v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1099, 1103-05 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining requirements for waiver). Although Segu-ra requested counsel at his next hearing on May 4, 2006, the IJ “took reasonable steps to ensure that [Segura’s] ... right to counsel was honored” by granting him a continuance. Mend*oza-Mazariegos,*509 F.3d at 1080.

We do not reach Segura’s claim that the agency erred by denying his request to withdraw his plea to the charge of remova-bility because he waived any challenge to the agency’s dispositive determination that the government presented clear and convincing evidence establishing his remova-bility. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued are deemed waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
LIMITED RELEASE 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THRSE PRESENTS: That the Federal Deposit Insmance 

Corpora1ion, as Receiver for Metro Bank of Dade County (the "FDIC"), for and in consideration 

of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other valuable consideration, the receipt and 

sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, 

DOES HEREBY settle, rem1se, release, acquit, satisfy and forever discharge Shutts & 

Bowen LLP ("S&B") and William F. Smith ("Mr. Smith" and, together with S&B, the "S&B 

Pmties"), and the S&B Parties' representatives, predecessors, heirs, successors, insurers, assigns, 

employees, nttorneys, principals, members, agents, and all other entities and persons acting by, 

tlU'ough, under, or in conce1t with either or both of them, of and from any and all claims, 

countet·claims, and causes of action, which could have been brought, asse1ted m· maintained in 

the litigation styled FDIC v. Shutts & Bowen et a(., Case No. 10-23166-CNHUCKJBANDSTRA, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (the 

"Lawsuit"), which the FDIC (or Metro Bank of Dade County) ever bad or now has, whether 

known or unknown, and whether matured or urunatured. 

This Limited Release shall be governed by, enforced under, and construed in accordance 

with the laws of the State of Florida. 

The FDIC agrees with and acknowledges that it has been represented by independent 

legal counsel of its choice with respect to the terms and conditions of this Limited Release, and 

the legal effects and binding nature hereof. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the FDIC has ., j executed this Limited Release Agreement on this~ day ofUnC?....- , 2011. 

(b)(6) ---!--- I 

FEDERAJ0:::WOSIT INSiifd\NCE 

CORPORATION 

By: c(~JOil( k' Cor.t00 y 

Its: Cour.s~ I - l29d Dh'I ~JOn
Order entered March 6, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01542-CV

SANDRA BEASLEY, Appellant

V.

WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 98406-86

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 5, 2019 unopposed second motion for an extension 

of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to March 19, 2019. We

caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
dELiA*s Operating Company
                                435 Hudson Street
                               New York, NY 10014





                                                              September 15, 1998

Mr. Evan Guillemin
dELiA*s
435 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10014

        Re:    First Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dear Mr. Edgar:

     This letter, when countersigned by you, shall constitute the First
Amendment to the Employment Agreement between you and dELiA*s Inc. (subsequently
assigned to dELiA*s Operating Company), dated as of November 25, 1996. Section
3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the amount
"$100,000" and replacing it with "$150,000." In all other respects, the
Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect without
modification.

     If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please countersign below in the
space indicated.

                                                   Sincerely,

                                                   dELiA*s Operating Company


                                                   By:____________________
                                                          Stephen I. Kahn
                                                          President

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:



____________________________
EVAN GUILLEMIN
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4649-N-08]


Announcement of OMB Approval Number for Rental Rehabilitation 
Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Announcement of OMB approval number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the OMB approval 
number for the collection of information pertaining to Rental 
Rehabilitation Program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Frank Price, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, NS., Washington, DC 20410, 
telephone (202) 708-2094. This is not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
chapter 35, as amended), this notice advises that OMB has responded to 
the Department's request for approval of the information collection 
pertaining to Rental Rehabilitation Program. The OMB approval number 
for this information collection is 2506-0080, which expires on January 
31, 2004.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
Donna M. Abbenante,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4789 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13508-13509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on E-Commerce will

[[Page 13509]]

meet in closed session on March 28, 2001; April 25-26, 2001; May 1-2, 
2001; June 5-6, 2001; June 26-27, 2001; and July 24-25, 2001, at SAIC, 
Inc., 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. This Task Force will review 
the DoD's current implementation status of a e-commerce tools and make 
any appropriate recommendations that might enhance opportunities for 
cost reduction, capital and manpower efficiency.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review and evaluate 
the Department's new procurement approaches and its current 
implementation status in light of the fact that the Department has one 
of the largest acquisition systems in the world for both goods and 
services.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and that accordingly these meetings will 
be closed to the public.

    Dated: February 28, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-5389 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

A meeting of the Midwest Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 22, 2001, and Friday, March 23, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra McQuin at 1-888-912-1227, or 414-297-1604.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel (CAP) will be held Thursday, March 22, 2001, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and Friday, March 23, 2001, from 8:00 a.m. to Noon at the Reuss Federal Building, Meeting Room 290B, 310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI. The Citizen Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Public comments will be welcome during the meeting, or you can submit written comments to the panel by faxing to (414) 297-1623, or by mail to Citizen Advocacy Panel, Mail Stop 1006 MIL, 310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221.

The Agenda will include the following: Reports by the CAP sub-groups, presentation of taxpayer issues by individual members, discussion of issues, and an update on the recruitment for new panel members.

# Note:

Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could prevent effective advance notice.

Dated: February 26, 2001.

M. Cathy VanHorn,

Director, Citizen Advocacy Panel (CAP) Communication and Liaison.

[FR Doc. 01-5286 Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P