alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.1

June  6, 2008



|                                                                                                                                                      |  |                                         |  |                                                                       
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|China Sunergy Co., Ltd. No. 123, Focheng West Road,
Jiangning Economic & Technical Development Zone Nanjing Jiangsu 211100 Peoples Republic of China |  | DIRECT LINE: E-MAIL: OUR REF: YOUR REF: |  | 2842 9595 Andrew.Lee@conyersdillandpearman.com AL/yc/266170 (M#871778)

Dear Sirs,

China
Sunergy Co., Ltd. (the Company)

Annual Report on Form 20-F

We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December, 2007 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and to the
reference therein to our firm under the heading Cayman Islands Taxation in the annual report. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of
the Securities Act, or the Rules and Regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

Yours faithfully,



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Conyers Dill & Pearman
|Conyers Dill & Pearman
EX-34.10
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

Ernst & Young LLP
Suite 1000
55 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard
Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Phone: (404) 874-8300
www.ey.com



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc. ('the Company' or
'ZCSIA') complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the ZC Sterling
Automated Tracking Solution (Tracking System) Hazard Insurance Outsourcing
Platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
Company has determined that only certain servicing criteria Item 1122 (d)(1)
(iv), Item 1122(d)(4)(xi), Item 1122(d)(4)(xii), and Item 1122(d)(4)(xiii) are
applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform
covered by this report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by them with
respect to the Platform covered by this report. See Appendix A of management's
assertion for the Platform and Servicers covered by this report. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the Platform. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



February 14, 2008



A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Alberto JOHNSON-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10186

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 1, 2007.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David H. Martinez, Law Office of David Martinez, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Alberto Johnson-Ramirez appeals from the sentence imposed pursuant to his guilty-plea conviction for transportation of illegal aliens and aiding and abetting. Johnson-Ramirez argues that he should not have received an adjustment for obstruction of justice and he should have received an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.

The Government moves for dismissal of this appeal because, as part of his plea agreement, Johnson-Ramirez waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence except on grounds that the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum punishment or that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Johnson-Ramirez’s arguments do not rest upon either of these exceptions to his waiver. Johnson-Ramirez did not respond to the Government’s motion and did not challenge the validity of his guilty plea or the appeal-waiver provision.

There is nothing in the record on appeal to suggest that Johnson-Ramirez did not knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence. Accordingly, Johnson-Ramirez’s appeal is barred by the waiver contained in the plea agreement. *See United States v. Portillo,*18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir.1994). The Government’s *314motion to summarily affirm is granted. The Government’s motion to dismiss or alternatively for an extension of time is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO SUMMARILY AFFIRM GRANTED; MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Presidential Documents

13639

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 44

Tuesday, March 6, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7410 of February 28, 2001

Fortieth Anniversary of the Peace Corps

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

The generous spirit of the American people has given this country a great

and long-standing tradition of voluntary service. During the past four decades,

the members of the Peace Corps have carried on that tradition with dramatic

and far-reaching effect.

Established in 1961, the Peace Corps has brought a wealth of practical

assistance to individuals and communities through out the world. Since

its inception, more than 161,000 Americans have served as Peace Corps

volunteers in 134 countries. Peace Corps volunteers have not only helped

to fill immediate and dire human needs, but also have helped promote

sustainable, long-term development in agriculture, business, education, urban

development, health care, and the environment.

In many countries of the world, there exists an intense hunger for peace,

hope, and opportunity—for genuine social and economic development that

is rooted in respect for human rights and a belief in human potential.

Recognizing the dignity and worth of all peoples and determined to help

individuals help themselves, Peace Corps volunteers have served as our

Nation’s emissaries of hope and goodwill. Accordingly, their generous efforts

have helped to foster mutual understanding and respect between the people

of the United States and citizens of other countries.

Respected for its work around the world, the Peace Corps also conducts

a number of valuable programs here at home. For example, through programs

such as the Paul Coverdell World Wise Schools and Peace Corps Fellows/

USA, Peace Corps volunteers are helping children in every State of our

Nation to learn more about the world in which we live.

I am pleased to note that the current volunteer corps is the most ethnically

diverse in Peace Corps history and that more and more Americans are

joining in the work of the Peace Corps through its growing partnerships

with the public and private sectors. These trends are a tribute to the many

past achievements of the Peace Corps, and they are a promising sign of

more to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby urge all Americans to observe

March 1, 2001—the 40th anniversary of the Peace Corps—with appropriate

programs, ceremonies, and activities designed to honor Peace Corps volunteers, past and present, for their many contributions to our country and

to the universal cause of peace and human progress.

13640 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2001 / Presidential Documents

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth

day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twentyfifth.

Filed 3

Billing code 3195

[FR Doc. 01

–5–01; 11:47 am]

–5669

–01–P

W
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than March 22, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:                

*1.  Eunice Barker*, Dunlap, Tennessee; Flavius Barker, Naomi Barker, both of Columbia, Tennessee; Glenn Barker and Patsy Barker, both of Dunlap, Tennessee; Greg Barker, Dunlap, Tennessee; Glenda Mabry, and Carl D. Mabry, both of Lenoir City, Tennessee; Allen Barker, Dunlap, Tennessee; Ann Hale, and Harmon L. Hale, both of Dunlap, Tennessee; John Barker, Dunlap, Tennessee; Charles Barker, Dunlap, Tennessee; and Sara Hampton, Terry, Mississippi; all to retain voting shares of Sequatchie Valley Bancshares, Inc., Dunlap, Tennessee, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Citizens Tri-County Bank, Dunlap, Tennessee.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 2, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-5606 Filed 3-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Brian FORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael WASHINGTON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-35138.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 24, 2011.

Brian Ford, Beaverton, OR, pro se.

Greg Allen Rios, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR-Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, William G. Blair, Washington County Counsel, Hillsboro, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*969MEMORANDUM **

Brian Ford appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action alleging claims concerning his designation as a predatory sex offender (“PSO”) and his conditions of parole. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals on statute of limitations grounds and under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). *Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish,*382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir.2004). We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend. *Lipton v. Pathogenesis Corp.,*284 F.3d 1027, 1038 (9th Cir.2002). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record, *Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP,*534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir.2008), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Ford’s claim challenging the PSO designation because it is barred by the statute of limitations. *See*Or.Rev.Stat. § 12.110(1) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims); *Cholla Ready Mix,*382 F.3d at 974 (explaining that, for section 1983 claims, federal courts borrow the applicable state’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims). Contrary to Ford’s contention, this claim accrued at the time of the PSO designation, and not when defendant Washington refused to remove the designation or when the Oregon Supreme Court decided *V.L.Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision,*338 Or. 44, 106 P.3d 145 (2005). *See Knox v. Davis,*260 F.3d 1009, 1013 (9th Cir.2001) (a section 1983 “ ‘claim accrues when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury which is the basis of the action’ ” (citation omitted)); *McConnell v. Critchlow,*661 F.2d 116, 118 (9th Cir.1981) (rejecting argument that section 1983 claim accrued when the right to suit was recognized by case law).

We affirm the denial of leave to amend as to Ford’s parole conditions claim. *See Lipton,*284 F.3d at 1039 (affirming denial of leave to amend where amendment would be futile); see *also Kansas v. Hendricks,*521 U.S. 346, 356-57, 117 S.Ct. 2072, 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997) (rejecting due process challenge in sexually violent predator context); *Cal. Dep’t of Corr. v. Morales,*514 U.S. 499, 504-08, 115 S.Ct. 1597, 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995) (rejecting ex post facto challenge in parole context).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.      78m(a) or 78o(d)) and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by      the Report. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 14,    2009 | /s/ Mary Lynn      Lenz                    |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Mary Lynn Lenz                                                                                                                            |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer and      President                                                                                                |
|                             | (Principal Executive    Officer)                                                                                                          |

----
Exhibit 21.1 

 

West Marine, Inc. and its subsidiaries do business under the following names: West Marine Products, West Marine, BoatU.S. and Port Supply. The following is a list of thesubsidiaries of West Marine, Inc., including the state of incorporation or jurisdiction of organization of each subsidiary: 

 

West Marine Products, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine Puerto Rico, Inc., a California corporation 

W Marine Management Company, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine LBC, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine IHC I, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine Canada Corp., a Nova Scotia Unlimited Liability Company
Exhibit
12.2




CEO
Certification




I,
Alejandro Macfarlane, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Empresa Distribuidora y
Comercializadora Norte S.A.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4. The
company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;




(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company’s internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and









(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
June 26, 2009




/s/Alejandro
      MacfarlaneChief
      Executive Officer




2
**INSTRUCTIONS**:  Please type or print all information legibly, date, and sign.  

1. I,      , being of lawful age, declare that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney appointing me as attorney-in-fact for         

(the “Principal”).    

2. I further declare that I have no knowledge of the revocation or termination of the Power of Attorney, nor has it been terminated by the death, disability or incompetence of the Principal.

3. This declaration is made to induce the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to pay insurance covering the above-referenced Account to the extent that the Account is covered by insurance.

4. This declaration, under penalty of perjury, is executed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.  Executed on:       

          ____________________________________________

    Signature of Attorney-in-Fact

**Note**:be sure to attach a copy of the Power of Attorney to this Declaration.

**THE PENALTY FOR KNOWINGLY MAKING OR INVITING RELIANCE ON ANY FALSE, FORGED OR COUNTERFEIT STATEMENT, DOCUMENT OR THING FOR THE PURPOSE OF INFLUENCING IN ANY WAY THE ACTION OF THE Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation IS A FINE OF NOT MORE THAN $1,000,000 OR IMPRISONMENT FOR NOT MORE THAN THIRTY YEARS, OR BOTH (18 U.S.C. § 1007).**

FDIC 7200/16 (5-14)