alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), announcement is made of the following Committee meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                             U.S. Army War College Subcommittee of the Army Education Advisory Committee.                        

*Dates of Meeting:*                             April 25, 26, 27, and 28, 2001.                        

*Place:*                             Root Hall, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania.                        

*Time:*                             8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                        

*Proposed Agenda:*                             Receive information briefings; conduct discussions with the Commandant staff and faculty; table and examine online College issues; assess resident and distance education programs, self-study techniques, and plans for the Process for Accreditation of Joint Education (PAJE) 2000; assemble a working group for the concentrated review of institutional policies and a working group to address committee membership and charter issues; propose strategies and recommendations that will continue the momentum of federal accreditation success and guarantee compliance with regional accreditation standards.                        

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

To request advance approval or obtain further information, contact Lieutenant Colonel Cary A. Hilton, Box 524, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013 or telephone (717) 245-3396.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Committee after receiving advance approval for participation. To request advance approval or obtain further information, contact Lieutenant Colonel Cary A. Hilton at the above address or phone number.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-5533 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

ETHAN A. CABRERA, § 

 § No. 150, 2018 

 Defendant Below, § 

Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court of the 

 § State of Delaware 

 v. § 

 § Cr. ID No. 1608018958 (S) 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § 

 § 

Plaintiff Below, § 

Appellee. § 

Submitted: June 15, 2018 

Decided: June 20, 2018 

 ORDER 

On May 23, 2018, the Clerk issued a notice, by certified mail, directing the 

appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for the appellant’s 

failure to file the opening brief. The appellant received the show cause notice on 

June 4, 2018, but did not respond to it, and he has not filed the opening brief. 

Accordingly, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Justice
{"agency":"FDIC","generated":"2018-07-17 11:25:22","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FDIC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["106"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["131"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["1"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q3"}
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement No. 333-158097 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-144315 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 11, 2009 related to the financial statements of Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C. as of December 31, 2008and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Spectra Energy Partners, LP for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Houston, Texas 

May 14, 2009
**Exhibit 32.02**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Macrovision Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James Budge certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge: 

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), and 

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of November 7, 2006.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
ACCOMPANYING  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1 
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1032276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1013069
<ALLOWANCES>                                    260749
<INVENTORY>                                     246250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2590203
<PP&E>                                          164076
<DEPRECIATION>                                   62682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2695890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           347672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     2676861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2695890
<SALES>                                        1217303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1217303
<CGS>                                           544156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   544156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1735803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1015319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1015319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1015319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
# Fortieth Anniversary of the Peace Corps

The generous spirit of the American people has given this country a great and long-standing tradition of voluntary service. During the past four decades, the members of the Peace Corps have carried on that tradition with dramatic and far-reaching effect.

Established in 1961, the Peace Corps has brought a wealth of practical assistance to individuals and communities through out the world. Since its inception, more than 161,000 Americans have served as Peace Corps volunteers in 134 countries. Peace Corps volunteers have not only helped to fill immediate and dire human needs, but also have helped promote sustainable, long-term development in agriculture, business, education, urban development, health care, and the environment.

In many countries of the world, there exists an intense hunger for peace, hope, and opportunity—for genuine social and economic development that is rooted in respect for human rights and a belief in human potential. Recognizing the dignity and worth of all peoples and determined to help individuals help themselves, Peace Corps volunteers have served as our Nation's emissaries of hope and goodwill. Accordingly, their generous efforts have helped to foster mutual understanding and respect between the people of the United States and citizens of other countries.

Respected for its work around the world, the Peace Corps also conducts a number of valuable programs here at home. For example, through programs such as the Paul Coverdell World Wise Schools and Peace Corps Fellows/USA, Peace Corps volunteers are helping children in every State of our Nation to learn more about the world in which we live.

I am pleased to note that the current volunteer corps is the most ethnically diverse in Peace Corps history and that more and more Americans are joining in the work of the Peace Corps through its growing partnerships with the public and private sectors. These trends are a tribute to the many past achievements of the Peace Corps, and they are a promising sign of more to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby urge all Americans to observe March 1, 2001—the 40th anniversary of the Peace Corps—with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities designed to honor Peace Corps volunteers, past and present, for their many contributions to our country and to the universal cause of peace and human progress.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 01-5669

Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Kranti Resources,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jaskarn Samra, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Jaskarn
Samra  Name: Jaskarn
Samra Title:
   Chief Executive and Financial Officer   Date: January
11, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Barry ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-30124

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2011.

*784Gaven Dali Kammer, Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq., Stephen Andrew Higginson, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Robin Elise Schulberg, Valerie Welz Jusselin, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Barry Robinson appeals from the judgment of revocation of his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation. He was arrested twice by local authorities and charged with the state offenses of attempted theft and monetary instrument abuse. He contends that the district court improperly relied on a ground not alleged in the rule to revoke, namely, his lying to the authorities about the episodes underlying his arrests and state charges, thus depriving him of notice of the grounds for revocation. He argues that the district court made no finding as to whether he committed the attempted theft offense, though he acknowledges that the district court found that he committed abuse of a monetary instrument.

Robinson did not raise his arguments in the district court. Our review is under the plain error standard. *See United States v. Magwood,*445 F.3d 826, 828 (5th Cir.2006).

Robinson’s contentions hinge on his construction of the district court’s remarks at his revocation hearing. The district court’s commentary about Robinson’s lying did not suggest that the revocation was based on lying; rather, the commentary was relevant to whether Robinson was guilty of the state offenses. *See United States v. Villarreal,*324 F.3d 319, 325 (5th Cir.2003). Moreover, the district court commented on both of the state offenses sufficiently to make an implicit finding of guilt as to both state offenses, after hearing the testimony of a police officer and a deputy sheriff and after reading the probation officer’s report on Robinson’s arrests.

Robinson suggests for the first time in his reply brief that the dismissal of the state charges against him means that the district court relied on his lying as the reason for the revocation of his supervised release. This court generally will not consider issues raised for the first time in a reply brief. *United States v. Rodriguez,*602 F.3d 346, 360 (5th Cir.2010). We do not consider Robinson’s contention.

Robinson has failed to demonstrate that the district court relied on lying as a separate ground for revocation or that the district court made no finding as to the attempted theft charge in Jefferson Parish. He has failed to demonstrate any error, plain or otherwise. *See Magwood,*445 F.3d at 828.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Randall E. Meyer, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of the registrants board of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated: November 3, 2004/s/ Randall E. MeyerRandall E. Meyer
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


To my  knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained  in this  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of First South Bancorp, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Thomas A. Vann
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Thomas A. Vann
                                            President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)



                                        By: /s/ William L. Wall
                                            -------------------------------
                                            William L. Wall
                                            Executive Vice President
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 13, 2002

                                       15
<PAGE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 10498 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:12

- cr - 80113

- KAM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus AARON JOHNSON, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

___ _____________________

(September 5, 2013) Before TJOFLAT , PRYOR and MARTIN , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-10498 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 of 22 Aaron Johnson appeals his 180

- month sentence after pleading guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). Johnson’s sentence was the mandatory minimum under § 924(e)(1), which states that a person who violates § 922(g) and has three previous convictions for a violent felony or serious drug offense, shall be imprisoned for not less tha n fifteen years. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Johnson ’s only argument on appeal is that his sentence “runs afoul of the Fifth and Sixth Amendment [s] ,” because the indictment did not identify the three prior convictions that supported the application of § 924(e)(1)’s mandatory minimum. However, as Johnson acknowledges, his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 118 S. Ct. 1219 (1998). In that
case, the Supreme Court held that prior convictions “relevant only to the

sen tencing of an offender found guilty of the charged crime” do not need to be charged in an indictment or proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. Id. at 228

– 47, 118 S. Ct. at 1223

– 33. Almendarez

- Torres “remains good law.” United States v. Weeks , 711 F.3d 1255, 1259 (11th Cir. 2013). For these reasons, Johnson’s sentence is AFFIRMED. Case: 13-10498 Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 2 of 2