alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,184,495
<SECURITIES>                                 5,076,643
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,494,029
<PP&E>                                         577,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,951,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,235
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         7,749
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,871,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,951,964
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,737
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,280,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,365,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,365,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,365,650)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-200-062]

Take notice that on December 21, 2000, Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective January 1, 2001:

Second Revised Sheet No. 8K 

Original Sheet No. 8K.01

REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the addition of a new negotiated rate arrangement involving three contracts.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​      ( print page 1659)    rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-520  Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
November 26, 2019
No. 04

- 19

- 00712

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF Z. M. A CHILD, From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- PA

- 01197 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant Mom ’s brief was due to be filed with this court on Novem ber 25 , 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On t he due date , Mom filed a motion for a twenty

- day e xtension of time to file her brief

. A ppellant Mom ’s motion is GRANTED. Her br ief is due on Dece mber 16 , 2019

. Any further motion for extension of time to file the brief is discouraged. S ee T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2 (directing courts of appeals to dispose of parental rights termination suits “[w]ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed”).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
# By District

# By Quarter

# By HACCP Size
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION

I, W. W. Boisture, Jr., principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft
Notes Company (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. W. Boisture, Jr.                     
|W. W. Boisture, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                                            
|August 9, 2011
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2716

To amend the charter of the Group Hospitalization and Medical Services,

Inc., to remove the partial exemption granted to the corporation from

the insurance laws and regulations of the District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 22, 1993

Mr. STARK (for himself and Mr. MCDERMOTT) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the District of Columbia

A BILL

To amend the charter of the Group Hospitalization and

Medical Services, Inc., to remove the partial exemption

granted to the corporation from the insurance laws and

regulations of the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LEGAL DOMICILE.

4 The first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act provid5 ing for the incorporation of certain persons as Group Hos6 pitalization, Inc.’’, approved August 11, 1939 (hereafter

7 referred to as ‘‘the Act’’), is amended by adding at the
2

•HR 2716 IH

1 end the following: ‘‘The District of Columbia shall be the

2 legal domicile of the corporation.’’.

3 SEC. 2. REGULATORY AUTHORITY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5 of the Act is amended

5 to read as follows:

6 ‘‘SEC. 5. The corporation shall be licensed and regu7 lated by the District of Columbia in accordance with the

8 laws and regulations of the District of Columbia.’’.

9 (b) REPEAL.—The Act is amended by striking section

10 7.

11 SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT OF REGULATORY COSTS BY THE

12 CORPORATION.

13 The Act (as amended by section 2 of this Act) is

14 amended by inserting after section 6 the following new

15 section:

16 ‘‘SEC. 7. The corporation shall reimburse the District

17 of Columbia for the costs of insurance regulation (includ18 ing financial and market conduct examinations) of the cor19 poration and its affiliates and subsidiaries by the District

20 of Columbia.’’.

21 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

22 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect

23 October 1, 1993.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, March 9, 2001, 9:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

# STATUS:

 

### Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.

II. Approval of Minutes of February 16, 2001 Meeting.

III. Announcements.

IV. Staff Director's Report.

V. Project Planning.

VI. Status Report on Voting Rights Issues.

VII. State Advisory Committee Report:
      - Reconciliation at a Crossroads: The Implications of Rice V. Cayetano on Programs for Native hawaiians (Hawaii);
      - The Decision to Prosecute Drug Offense and Homicides in Marion County, Indiana (Indiana).

VIII. Future Agenda Items.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Aronson, Press and Communications (202) 376-8312.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-5426  Filed 3-1-01; 2:24 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7594.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 28, 2011.

Israel Hernandez-Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Israel Hernandez-Hernandez seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hernandez-Hernandez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
2009-0898.

#### Howard v. Lawton.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-548, 2009-Ohio-639.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1960]


Dairyland Power Cooperative; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

March 2, 2001.
    On February 19, 1999, the Dairyland Power Cooperative, license for 
the Flambeau Project No. 1960, filed an application for a new or 
subsequent license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (EPA) and the 
Commission's regulations thereunder. Project No. 1960 is located on the 
Flambeau River in Rusk County, Wisconsin.
    The license for Project No. 1960 was issued for a period ending 
February 28, 2001. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year to year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 1960 is issued to 
the Dairyland Power Cooperative for a period effective March 1, 2001, 
through February 28, 2002, or until the issuance of a new license for 
the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. 
If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place 
on or before March 1, 2002, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that the Dairyland Power Cooperative is authorized to 
continue operation of the Flambeau Project No. 1960 until time as the 
Commission acts on its application for subsequent license.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5642 Filed 3-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                PREMIER RESEARCH WORLDWIDE, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                 (in thousands, except for earnings per share)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              For the Three Months Ended
                                                                              --------------------------
                                                                            March 31, 1997   March 31, 1996
                                                                            --------------   --------------
<S>                                                                         <C>              <C>
Net income                                                                      $  424
                                                                                ======

Average shares outstanding                                                       6,096

Net effect of dilutive stock options-based on the
  treasury stock method using average market price                                 269
                                                                                ------
Weighted average share                                                           6,365
                                                                                ======

Earnings per common and common equivalent share                                 $ 0.07
                                                                                ======
Pro Forma net loss                                                                            $     (18)
                                                                                              =========
Pro forma weighted average shares assuming the conversion of the
  minority interest in the limited liability company into Common Stock
  of the Company as if it had converted as of January 1, 1996 instead of
  at the closing of the initial public offering.                                                  5,003
                                                                                              =========
Pro forma earnings per common and common equivalent share                                     $   (0.00)
                                                                                              =========
</TABLE>
#### Consuelo Del Rosario UMANA-AREVALO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71009.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 23, 2007.

Christopher J. Stender, Esq., Stender *&*Pope, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Nora W. Terres, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*580MEMORANDUM **

Consuelo Umana-Arevalo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings in which she was ordered deported in absentia. We deny the petition for review in part and dismiss it in part.

The record establishes that notice of Umana-Arevalo’s November 1988 hearing was sent to her. Umana-Arevalo attended that hearing and, according to the IJ, received oral notice of her next hearing date. *See Matter of M-D-,*23 I. & N. Dec. 540, 542 (BIA 2002) (“Prior to 1992, the Act provided only that ‘the alien shall be given notice, reasonable under all the circumstances, of the nature of the charges against him and of the time and place at which the proceedings will be held.’ ” (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) (1988))). The IJ’s decision was not an abuse of discretion.

We lack jurisdiction to review Umana-Arevalo’s unexhausted due process claim that the record should contain a transcript of her November 1988 hearing. *See Zara v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 927, 931 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>               5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000


<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                    14
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                          6,305
<ALLOWANCES>                             201
<INVENTORY>                           18,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      26,689
<PP&E>                                 6,462
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        32,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 11,278
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                  39
<OTHER-SE>                            19,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          32,208
<SALES>                               28,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      28,159
<CGS>                                 19,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         19,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       5,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        3,221
<INCOME-TAX>                           1,207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    2,014
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,014
<EPS-BASIC>                            .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .51



</TABLE>