alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2009-1856.

#### State v. Petralia.

Lake App. No. 2008-L-095, 2009-Ohio-4450. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, *State v. Bodyke,*Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2001)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 1251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-527]



[[Page 1249]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part V





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of January 4, 2001--Continuation of Libya Emergency


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2001 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 1251]]

                Notice of January 4, 2001

                
Continuation of Libya Emergency

                On January 7, 1986, by Executive Order 12543, President 
                Reagan declared a national emergency to deal with the 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security and foreign policy of the United States 
                constituted by the actions and policies of the 
                Government of Libya. On January 8, 1986, by Executive 
                Order 12544, the President took additional measures to 
                block Libyan assets in the United States. The President 
                has transmitted a notice continuing this emergency to 
                the Congress and the Federal Register every year since 
                1986.

                The crisis between the United States and Libya that led 
                to the declaration of a national emergency on January 
                7, 1986, has not been resolved. Despite the United 
                Nations Security Council's suspension of U.N. sanctions 
                against Libya upon the Libyan government's hand over of 
                the Pan Am 103 bombing suspects, there are still 
                concerns about the Libyan government's support for 
                terrorist activities and its noncompliance with United 
                Nations Security Council Resolutions 731 (1992), 748 
                (1992), and 883 (1993).

                Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
                National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing the national emergency with respect to 
                Libya. This notice shall be published in the Federal 
                Register and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                     January 4, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-527
Filed 01-04-01; 11:56 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
[No. 55188-4-I.

Division One.

September 17, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Tony Robert Kinsey, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 04-1-01406-5, Sharon S. Armstrong, J., entered October 15, 2004. *Reversed*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






To The
Board of Directors


Rino
International Corporation and subsidiaries






We
consent to the use of our report dated March 29, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Rino International Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
income and other comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009 to include in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for Rino International Corporation.






/S/
Frazer Frost, LLP




Brea,
California




March 31,
2010
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 289 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 289

 To adjust the boundary of the Arapaho National Forest, Colorado, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2017

Mr. Bennet (for himself and Mr. Gardner) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To adjust the boundary of the Arapaho National Forest, Colorado, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Arapaho National Forest Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ARAPAHO NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Arapaho National Forest in the 
State of Colorado is adjusted to incorporate the approximately 92.95 
acres of land generally depicted as ``The Wedge'' on the map entitled 
``Arapaho National Forest Boundary Adjustment'' and dated November 6, 
2013, and described as lots three, four, eight, and nine of section 13, 
Township 4 North, Range 76 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado. A 
lot described in this subsection may be included in the boundary 
adjustment only after the Secretary of Agriculture obtains written 
permission for such action from the lot owner or owners.
    (b) Bowen Gulch Protection Area.--The Secretary of Agriculture 
shall include all Federal land within the boundary described in 
subsection (a) in the Bowen Gulch Protection Area established under 
section 6 of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 539j).
    (c) Land and Water Conservation Fund.--For purposes of section 
200306(a)(2)(B)(i) of title 54, United States Code, the boundaries of 
the Arapaho National Forest, as modified under subsection (a), shall be 
considered to be the boundaries of the Arapaho National Forest as in 
existence on January 1, 1965.
    (d) Public Motorized Use.--Nothing in this Act opens privately 
owned lands within the boundary described in subsection (a) to public 
motorized use.
    (e) Access to Non-Federal Lands.--Notwithstanding the provisions of 
section 6(f) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 539j(f)) 
regarding motorized travel, the owners of any non-Federal lands within 
the boundary described in subsection (a) who historically have accessed 
their lands through lands now or hereafter owned by the United States 
within the boundary described in subsection (a) shall have the 
continued right of motorized access to their lands across the existing 
roadway.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dr. Samuel S Asculai , certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Enhance Skin Products Inc;





2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








By:
/s/ Dr. Samuel S. AsculaiDate: November 6, 2009

Dr. Samuel S. AsculaiPresident & Chief Executive Officer
RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS

2009-2003.

#### State ex rel. Hazel v. Bender.

Franklin App. No. 09AP-37, 2009-Ohio-5028. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 147, 2010-Ohio-124, 920 N.E.2d 147. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vachesla Golger, Also Known as Vacheslav, Appellant.

[2 NYS3d 907]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered October 7, 2013, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

An intoxication charge should be issued when, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant, there is sufficient evidence of intoxication in the record for a reasonable person to entertain a doubt as to an element on that basis (see *People v Beaty,*22 NY3d 918, 921 [2013]; *People v Farnsworth,*
      *91565 NY2d 734, 735 [1985]). Here, the defendant did not demonstrate his entitlement to a charge on intoxication *(see People v Beaty,*22 NY3d at 921; *People v Sirico,*17 NY3d 744, 745 [2011]; *People v Gaines,*83 NY2d 925, 927 [1994]; *People v Rodriguez,*76 NY2d 918, 920 [1990]; *cf. People v Velcher,*116 AD3d 799 [2014]).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of sexual abuse in the first degree and assault in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see*CPL 70.10 [1]; Penal Law §§ 10.00 [9]; 120.05 [6]; 130.00 [3], [8]; 130.65 [1]; *People v Chiddick,*8 NY3d 445, 447 [2007]; *People v Santi,*3 NY3d 234, 236 [2004]; *People v Taylor,*94 NY2d 910, 911 [2000]).

Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lottery & Wagering Solutions Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Miles R. Greenberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Miles R. Greenberg
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     March 24, 2005
Planning Your Career Path 

Explore new videos every day that can be completed in around 5 minutes. 

Don’t worry if you miss a day — you can always catch up tomorrow. 

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday

Having a Career Vision 

is Essential 

(1m 37s) 

Grow a Career Instead of a Job 

(2m 58s) 

What Do You Want in 

Your Future Career? 

(1m 44s) 

Reflection: 

How do you feel about 

your current career vision? 

Build a Career Vision 

(3m 21s) 

Activity: What are the top 3 things 

you want out of your future career? Evaluate Potential Career Paths 

(3m 11s) 

Clarifying Your Work Values 

(2m 32s) 

Know What Your Career Goals Are 

(4m 40s) 

Create a Clear Professional Goal 

(3m 23s) 

Create Short-Term and 

Long-Term Goals 

(3m 34s) 

Identify Your Passion 

(2m 14s) 

Activity: List 3 short-term goals 

and 1 long-term goal. Identify Potential Roadblocks 

or Accelerators 

(4m 02s) 

The Three Circles 

(2m 49s) 

Transferable Skills vs. 

Relevant Experience 

(2m 26s) 

Identify Resources 

(3m 32s) 

Take Control of Your Career 

(3m 19s) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Linked mi Learning 

Reflection: 

Spend some time analyzing 

your values and passions. 

Reflection: 

What’s a course you’ll commit 

to taking next month?
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Bruce Johnson, the Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
undersigned's knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2003
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 7, 2003                              Bruce Johnson
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Bruce Johnson,
                                                    Sr. Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Gryphon Holdings Inc.:

We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 333-12775, 33-96922, and 33-83630) on  Form  S-8
of  Gryphon Holdings Inc. of our report dated February 14,  1997,
relating  to  the consolidated balance sheets of Gryphon  Holdings
Inc.  and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, 
and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period then
ended, and  all  related schedules as of and for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, which report appears in the December
31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Gryphon Holdings Inc.





                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



New York, New York
March 26, 1997
2009-1749.

#### Torrance v. West.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is dismissed due to relator’s failure to respond to the order issued by this court on October 6, 2009 to show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action without payment of the filing fee and security deposit.
#### James ADEYEMI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-2193.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2007.

Decided: March 14, 2007.

James Adeyemi, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Kenneth Kurman, Offit *&*Kurman, Owings Mills, Maryland; Laura L. Rubenstein, Offit & Kurman, Maple Lawn, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Adeyemi appeals the district court’s order granting his former employer’s motion for summary judgment in his action alleging disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *291Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Adeyemi v. Chimes District of Columbia, Inc.,*No. 1:05-cv-02360-CCB (D.Md. Oct. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Dixon *v.*The State.

Littue, J.

1. To render a confession of guilt admissible as evidence it must have been made voluntarily, without being induced by another by the slightest hope of benefit. Hence, any advice to a prisoner under arrest by the officer having her in custody, to the effect that if she knew anything she had better tell it, vitiates a confession induced thereby. *Green*v. *State,*88 *Ga.*516.

2. When in the trial of a criminal case it becomes a question whether or not the accused made a confession, a charge assuming that he did so is erroneous. Under such circumstances, the court should, in the proper connection, distinctly instruct the jury to ascertain from the evidence whether a confession has been in fact made.

*1040Argued June 17,

Decided July 22, 1901.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Evans. Johnson superior court. May 18, 1901.

*James K. Hines, Kent & Hatcher,*and *John Ii. Cooper,*for plaintiff in error. *J. M. Terrell, attorney-general,*and *B. T. Bawlingsf solicitor-general,*contra.

3. Other than as above indicated, there was at the trial now under review no-material error a repetition of which will probably occur on the next hearing.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, January 12, 2001, 8:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Holiday Inn Select Hotel, 316 West Tennessee Street, Tallahassee, FL 32301.

# STATUS:

 

## Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Approval of Minutes of December 8, 2000 Meeting 

III. Announcements

IV. Staff Director's Report

V. Planning Meeting for 2001

VI. Final Report Card: The Civil Rights Performance of the Clinton Administration

VII. State Advisory Committee Report
      - Who is Enforcing Civil rights in Arkansas: Is There a Need for a State Civil Rights Agency?

VIII. Future Agenda Items

9:00 a.m. Hearing To Reconvene From Previous Day

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

 Les Jin, Office of the Staff Director (202) 376-7700.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,

Acting General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-459  Filed 1-3-01; 2:12 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-00-M