alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF GRAND MONARCH HOLDINGS, INC.  The undersigned does hereby form and establish a corporation under the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and for that purpose does certify as follows:  ARTICLE I:  The name of the corporation shall be:  GRAND MONARCH HOLDINGS, INC.  ARTICLE II:  The registered office for this corporation in the State of Delaware is Suite 201, 910 Foulk Rd., County of New Castle, Wilmington, DE 19803, and its registered agent at that address is Corporations and Companies, Inc.  ARTICLE III:  The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.  ARTICLE IV:  The amount of the authorized capital stock of this corporation is 35,000,000 shares of stock at a par value of $.001 per share.  ARTICLE V:  The name and address of the incorporator are: Scott H. Sharp, 910 Foulk Road, Suite 201, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19803.  ARTICLE VI:  A director of the corporation shall not be liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for break of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof so not permitted under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware as the same exists or may hereafter be amended.  Any amendment, modification or repeal of the foregoing sentence by the stockholders of the corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the corporation in respect of any act or omission occurring prior to the time of such amendment, modification or repeal.  ARTICLE VII:  The stockholders and directors shall have the power to hold their meetings, to have an office or offices, to keep the books, documents and papers of the corporation outside the State of Delaware at such places as might from time to time be designated by the by-laws or resolutions of the directors or stockholders, except as otherwise required by the law of Delaware.  THE UNDERSIGNED, being the incorporator hereinabove named, for the purpose of forming a corporation pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does make this certificate, acknowledging under the penalty of perjury, hereby declaring and certifying that his instrument is the act and the facts herein are true, pursuant to 8 Del. C §103(b)(2) and accordingly have hereunto caused this Certificate to be executed by incorporator, this 18th day of December, 2006.   By: _________________________________ Scott H. Sharp, INCORPORATOR 910 Foulk Road, Suite 201 New Castle County Wilmington, Delaware 19803
MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):

2009-1897.

#### State ex rel. Turner v. Carthage Twp. Bd. of Trustees.

In Mandamus.
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
               CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
               SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of The Kingsley Coach, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


May 22, 2006                               By: /s/ John Merkent
                                           ---------------------------
                                           John Merkent
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350.

 

 

I, Tom W. Olofson, Chief Executive Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 oftitle 18, United States Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof the Company to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Tom W. Olofson                                                                                     |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Tom W. Olofson                                                                                         |   |
|                                                                                                   |   |
| Dated:             November 13,  2003 |   |

 

 

I, Elizabeth M. Braham,Chief Financial Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifypursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code,and Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company to which thisExhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Elizabeth M. Braham                                                                                |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Elizabeth M. Braham                                                                                    |   |
|                                                                                                   |   |
| Dated:             November 13,  2003 |   |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1356-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Texas, (FEMA-1356-DR), dated January 8, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 22, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of January 8, 2001: 

Briscoe, Crosby, Floyd, Nacogdoches, San Augustine, and Shelby Counties for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-3936 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 10.3  MUTUAL AGREEMENT
 
 THIS MUTUAL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated December 1, 2008  is by and between David Bychkov (“Bychkov”), Cheyenne Crow (“Crow”) and Robert Doornick (“Doornick”, Doornick, Bychkov and Crow are each a “Party” and collectively referred to as “Parties”).  This Agreement will be effective upon completion of the Purchase as hereinafter defined (the “Effective Date”).
 
 WHEREAS, Bychkov owns directly or indirectly through his companies, Exmocare, LLC, Exmovere LLC and Exmogate LLC (collectively, the “Exmocare Companies”) certain intellectual property (the “Intellectual Property”);
 
 WHEREAS, Crow agreed to contribute to test and develop the Intellectual Property in partnership with government agencies, in return for $1.5 Million per year in equity (such amount due being referred to as the “Obligation to Crow”), should the Intellectual Property ever be purchased by a public company;
 
 WHEREAS Crow has performed his part of the bargain and either acted as a consultant to or has been employed by one of the Exmocare Companies since January 2004;
 
 WHEREAS, Robert Doornick agreed to contribute to the design and development of the Intellectual Property, in return for earning $150,000 per year in equity (such amount due being referred to as the “Obligation to Doornick”, the Obligation to Doornick along with the Obligation to Crow shall be collectively known as the “Obligations) should the Intellectual Property ever be owned by a public company;
 
 WHEREAS, Robert Doornick has performed his part of the bargain and made a substantial contribution to the development and/or marketing of the Intellectual Property since 2004;
 
 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the Intellectual Property would be better utilized if owned by a public company and the Parties along with others are seeking a method to go public;
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as set forth below.
 
 If any publicly owned company (the “Company”) purchases the Intellectual Property (the “Purchase”) whether owned by Bychkov and/or the Exmocare Companies in exchange for shares in the Company;
 
 ·
Simultaneously with such Purchase, Bychkov shall distribute a portion of the shares that he receives in exchange for the Purchase to Crow in an amount sufficient to satisfy the Obligation to Crow to be calculated in a reasonable and mutually agreed manner on the date of the Purchase.
 
 ·
Simultaneously with such Purchase, Bychkov shall distribute a portion of the shares that he receives in exchange for the Purchase to Doornick in an amount sufficient to satisfy the Obligation to Doornick to be calculated in a reasonable and mutually agreed manner on the date of the Purchase.
 
 
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written, which Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Exhibit
32.1b




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Limco-Piedmont Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Udi
Netivi, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Udi NetiviCo-Chief
      Executive Officer




March 6,
2009
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 279 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 279

   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 
            provision relating to acquisition of beach fill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2017

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 
            provision relating to acquisition of beach fill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sand Acquisition, Nourishment, and 
Development Act'' or the ``SAND Act''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF BEACH FILL.

    Section 935 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2299) is amended by striking ``if such materials are not 
available from domestic sources for environmental or economic 
reasons''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1





                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Joseph Esposito, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
undersigned's knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended March 31,
     2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: May 5, 2004                                        Joseph Esposito
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Joseph Esposito,
                                                   President and Chief Executive
                                                   Officer
#### EAST TENNESSEE TENANTS ASSOCIATION, FAIRVIEW CHAPTER, et al. v. Patricia Roberts HARRIS et al.

Civ. No. 3-79-11.

United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, N. D.

June 26, 1979.

James A. Burke, Rural Legal Services of Tenn., Oak Ridge, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

Erma G. Greenwood, W. Thomas Dillard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alphonse M. Alfano, Shalom Brilliant, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action for declaratory relief and damages arising out of the imposition of rent increases and utility surcharges at their federally-subsidized low-income housing project. The parties stipulated and consented to trial before the United States Magistrate. Prior to trial, the Magistrate decided, upon cross motions for summary judgment, that the administrative actions by the federal defendant were, in the main, unreviewable, that 24 C.F.R. § 215.-25(a) was a lawful exercise of the Secretary’s statutory authority, and that subject-matter jurisdiction did not exist with reference to plaintiffs’ claims against the private defendants. Accordingly, the Magistrate recommended that summary judgment be entered for the federal defendant and that the case against the private defendants be dismissed. Plaintiffs have now filed objections to the Magistrate’s report. The federal defendant has responded.

In the opinion of the Court the conclusions of the Magistrate with regard to the administrative discretion of the Secretary and the procedural rights of the plaintiffs are entirely correct. With regard *54to the private defendants the Court agrees that subject-matter jurisdiction does not exist because plaintiffs’ claims concern violations of the Regulatory agreement and lease agreements. Even were a violation of formal regulations plainly alleged, it is by no means clear that a private cause of action for damages would exist against private defendants where no attempt was made by plaintiffs to invoke the Secretary’s enforcement authority. *Cf. Goldman v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Wilmette,*518 F.2d 1247, 1250, n. 6 (7th Cir. 1975). The Magistrate’s decision not to consider the state contract claims was clearly correct given the dismissal of all federal issues prior to trial. *See United Mine Workers v. Gibbs,*383 U.S. 715, 726, 86 S.Ct. 1130, 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966).

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that the report of the Magistrate be, and the same is, adopted in full. It is further ORDERED that the case be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

Order accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,509
<SECURITIES>                                    16,759
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,624
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,141
<PP&E>                                          24,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,703
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,122
<SALES>                                         60,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,438
<CGS>                                            6,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,629)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.96)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         278,761
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          21,675
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               161,659
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,412,505
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         565,783
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      6,691,169
<ALLOWANCE>                                    110,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,880,864
<DEPOSITS>                                   8,102,441
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,802,776
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             54,739
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           68,775
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,066
<OTHER-SE>                                     851,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              13,880,864
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                436,016
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              231,323
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               667,339
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             190,589
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,883
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          331,867
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,695
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 281
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                269,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                146,688
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     146,688
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,841
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.61
<LOANS-NON>                                     47,417
<LOANS-PAST>                                    13,764
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,365
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               110,561
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   16,542
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,074
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              110,788
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           110,788
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>