alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Parkview Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bert L. Gusrae, Treasurer
of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.

|                                         | 
|---------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Bert L.
 Gusrae                      | 
|                                         | 
|Bert L.
 Gusrae                          | 
|Treasurer
 (Principal Financial Officer) | 
|                                         | 
|April 14, 2009                           | 

---
2010-0023.

#### State v. Russell.

Trumbull App. No. 2008-T-0074, 2009-Ohio-5213. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, *State v. Bodyke,*Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; cause consolidated with 2009-2078, *State v. Russell,*Trumbull App. No. 2008-T-0074, 2009-Ohio-5213; and briefing schedule stayed.
!lrn•vney Savings/ Johnk Va!t.Jetion 

Saptembcll' 1. 2009 

Page 1 of __ a_ 

Settlement A~treement 

(b)(6) 

(b)(6) 

(b)(6) 

(b)(6) 
(b)(6) 

(b)(6) 

Ifill// 

Downey SBvlnge/ Johnk Valustlcn 

Saptsmber 1, ~bog 

Page~dA 

Page 64 

7. Th s pafti.a? ;aumOIIII!~:~dga toot Obuo~a Hsgaclua Longs acting as tile Mll,ltral 

mat1te.l:or, lll"ld 1~ n~'t tf11~ ;;;ttomsy for gltJif!ll' par"Y. ThD plli""J.;;; oarep that~y 

hi!Vil ooci tha Cljlpart.l.llllr;yoo be fully Zldlllsed t.Jj toui'ISel of Jru!lr choir.P. nf tNl 

romlrlcetlelnti of tholr docisioo to oottla lhis IYtlltter, lncludln.g tha lo:;.e cr r>rrv riQ!'t 

m prooeed to ll trllll tD dWimlins tl".a!r s'"4Qhts and Qutil'lu ~1 thla matter. 

a, Each sJQa mall boor I!Btll\111 CCI~ and fees In thla metter' w.cept M ost; furth i11 • p.&rag~h 9, ba'b:Mo. . 

~. Thl1< fg ~ ~:~P.rnlsalb~ ~bls~~rg;m~ UmbQtw 9:t 

&!low¢ by ~w seif@teSn~~ lit'WihueMomia law. lilt aver}~ ttl&t any~ on1811rought.lr.!Eritltua rill" sa I'IOt Agrai!IITiel"lt, th" prevailing pa~ 11hall b& antf&bd to rmoool"lllble etta~ felete. 

10. An EEIWing Parties hereby ~niMtlgiywolv<l \he pt'O\I~oo Df0\'11 U.da 8e01;, 1542. 

l'tlhbaat2ml!l h!:!\reb~;~.en ~!nlltlln fi.lfl ~y 9acf1 parti;;.' oolJnSG~ l!llrfwhfch ctotas BB fcllc;w: 

"'A g anei'ill re!ea..Dfl dQA~ llllt oxtend to olaltna which the ~!tor doa10 no~ kl!ow QI'IIUBpSC£ 1:0 e..iat.ln hie or l)er fwor. et~ t!'ma of eowc~ litll release. wh!oh if k(II1J.:n by hno cr h!:!"' mw~ h~We ~l'fiilly aff~cted his or hsr ll~emant with 

the dehblr.• 

The ~o further und~tl'3ionti that upon slgnswra cf thl~ dooum~nt, ~hey have 

Mlv and fu61ly l'l!ltiled 11n Cli!lme. krlCMin or unlcno.r.tn.tWtintla, or ~llled, Jlet..o.reen mcmsorv~. . 

11. FD]C sh9111ile B dism[9e811111Jtll J;>rajudioil otl.hs entilt ~I on upcm rur.JIIrmmt of tlw 

tartr.s of p&N\gt11ph.J_ oflt!ln~ment. 'Tt!A pa.rUe9 Apaclflc:;JI~· rllquoottlwt thli CotJJ1i retelilfuriadin!;fon lllll'lrtltls ceGtJ ror lilnforcement [lf the settllm'rant. 

Ss Lurnbw·1. 2009 

Approved aa to fclrm: 

(b)(6) 

(b)(6)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Darrell W. SAMUEL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-7423.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2011.

*729Darrell W. Samuel, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darrell W. Samuel appeals a district court order denying his motion to reconsider the order granting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). The district court found it was without jurisdiction, citing *United States v. Goodwyn,*596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3530, 177 L.Ed.2d 1110 (2010). We conclude the court correctly denied Samuel’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Turner, Appellant, *v.*Brunsman, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Turner v. Brunsman,*123 Ohio St.3d 445, 2009-Ohio-5588.]

*446(No. 2009-1129

Submitted October 20, 2009

Decided October 28, 2009.)

Donald Turner, pro se.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and William H. Lamb, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Donald Turner, for a writ of habeas corpus. Turner’s claim of nonjurisdictional sentencing errors is not cognizable in habeas corpus. See, e.g., *Dunn v. Smith,*119 Ohio St.3d 364, 2008-Ohio-4565, 894 N.E.2d 312, ¶ 10. If, as Turner claims, the trial court refuses to issue a revised sentencing entry, he may compel the court to act through an action for a writ of mandamus or a writ of procedendo. Id. at ¶ 9.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, J. David Smith, Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Euramax International, Inc., certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Euramax International, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)                designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by this report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: November 8, 2004 | By:    | /s/ J. DAVID SMITH                                 |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Title: | *Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and President* |

 

----
Order entered May 24, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00687-CR

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUCHARME, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80054-2018

ORDER

Appellant, who was convicted of two counts of sexual assault of a child and one count of 

indecency with a child by sexual contact, filed his brief on May 12, 2019. In the appendix to the 

brief, he uses the name of the victim; in the body of the brief, he uses the names of witnesses 

who were children at the time of the offense. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011(c)(1) (child 

means a person younger than 17 years of age).

 Accordingly, we STRIKE appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, an amended 

brief that identifies the victim and any witness who was younger than 17 years of age at the time 

of the offense either generically (“victim” or “complaining witness”) or by initials only. See id.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Lara Bracamonte Davila and the 

Collin County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 81

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 81 to 85, revised as of July 1, 2000, in § 81.306, beginning on page 98 in the first column, remove the text from the table beginning with “Archuleta County” through the end of the table on page 100 up to the next heading ”Colorado -PM-10”. 

[FR Doc. 01-55512 Filed 4-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                         MARINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE
                        MARCH 31, 1998 AND MARCH 31, 1997

                                   (UNAUDITED)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Method - FAS 128, prior year restated
                                                   1998                   1998                   1997                   1997
                                                  Actual            Weighted Average            Actual            Weighted Average
                                                  ------            ----------------            ------            ----------------
<S>                                             <C>                 <C>                      <C>                  <C>
Common shares outstanding - beginning           4,421,120              4,421,120              2,701,110              2,701,110
Less: receivable shares                                 -                      -                (77,767)               (77,767)
                                                                                              ----------            -----------
Common shares outstanding - basic EPS           4,421,120              4,421,120              2,623,343              2,623,343
                                                ----------

Net loss for period                                                   $ (349,374)                                   $ (527,854)
                                                                      -----------                                   -----------

Basic and diluted loss per share                                      $    (0.08)                                   $    (0.20)
                                                                      ===========                                   ===========

Prior stated loss per share                                                  n/a                                    $    (0.18)
                                                                                                                    ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         172,350
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,619
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                76,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    678,864
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      2,191,276
<ALLOWANCE>                                     22,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,255,316
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,498,512
<SHORT-TERM>                                   516,258
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,375
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,419
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,255,316
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 90,880
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               21,442
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   866
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               113,188
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              38,680
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,356
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           62,832
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 46,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,980
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,722
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,722
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.64
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,391
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,242
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,716
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      889
<RECOVERIES>                                       171
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               22,248
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            22,248
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

s1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141106

DURAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellant,

v SC: 141106 COA: 287722 Kent CC: 06-007152-CZ CARL PERRIN,Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellee,

and

PERRIN EXCAVATING, LLC and OUTLAW EXCAVATING, LLC, Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Grant of Inspection - Additional Resources

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/small-business-regulatory-enforcement-fairness-act- sbrefa

FSIS Home Page

http://www.fsis.usda.gov

Code of Federal Regulations

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR&searchPath=

Title+9%2FChapter+III&oldPath=Title+9&isCollapsed=true&selectedYearFrom=2014&yco

rd=331

askFSIS

http://askfsis.custhelp.com or call 1-800-233-3935 for additional assistance

FSIS Directives

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulations/directives

NOTE: Directives provide instructions to IPP in performing verification activities within 

an FSIS inspected establishment.

FSIS Notices 

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulations/fsis-notices

NOTE: Notices provide guidance and/or clarification to IPP regarding Agency policy, 

regulations, or directives.

Interactive Knowledge Exchange (IKE) Scenario’s

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/inspection/workforce-training/ikescenarios

NOTE: IKE scenarios are a tool used to enhance and improve the scientific basis of 

inspection activities among FSIS field personnel.

HACCP Contacts and Coordinators 

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/informational/contactus/state-haccp-contacts-andcoordinators

Small and Very Small Plant Outreach

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulatory-compliance/svsp

Labeling and Program Delivery Division: Phone: (301) 504-0878

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulatory-compliance/labeling
 International Affairs - Exports / Imports http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/international-affairs

Sign up for the FSIS e-mail subscription service for up-to-date information http://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe

FSIS District Office Phone Numbers and Locations http://www.fsis.usda.gov/districtoffices

New Technologies 

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulatory-compliance/New-Technologies
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2834 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the wetland conservation 

program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2018 

Mr. HOEVEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the 

wetland conservation program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wetland Delineation 

5 Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WETLAND CONVERSION. 

7 Section 1221(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 

8 (16 U.S.C. 3821(d)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘Except as’’ and inserting the 

10 following: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2834 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(2) DUTY OF THE SECRETARY.—The Sec4 retary shall determine that a person is ineligible 

5 under paragraph (1) only after the Secretary deter6 mines that an exemption under section 1222(b) does 

7 not apply to that person.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. DELINEATION OF WETLANDS. 

9 (a) IDENTIFICATION OF MINIMAL EFFECT EXEMP10 TIONS.—Section 1222(d) of the Food Security Act of 

11 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3822(d)) is amended in the first sentence 

12 by inserting ‘‘and not later than 180 days after the date 

13 of enactment of the Wetland Delineation Act of 2018,’’ 

14 before ‘‘the Secretary’’. 

15 (b) MITIGATION BANKING.—Section 1222(k)(1)(B) 

16 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 

17 3822(k)(1)(B)) is amended— 

18 (1) by striking ‘‘Of the funds’’ and inserting 

19 the following: 

20 ‘‘(i) MANDATORY FUNDING.—Of the 

21 funds’’; 

22 (2) in clause (i) (as so designated), by striking 

23 ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and all that follows through ‘‘para24 graph’’ and inserting ‘‘to carry out this paragraph 

25 $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2019 and each fiscal 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2834 IS

1 year thereafter, to remain available until expended’’; 

2 and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(ii) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA5 TIONS.—There is authorized to be appro6 priated to the Secretary to carry out this 

7 paragraph $5,000,000 for each of fiscal 

8 years 2019 through 2023.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Order entered June 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01456 - CV SLOAN CREEK II, L.L. C., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS A ND NORTH TEXAS TOLLWAY AUTHORITY, Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 6 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006 - 3356 - 2008 

### O RDER The Court GRANTS a ppell ee the State of Texas’s unopposed motion for leave to file post

- submission letter brief

. We ORDER the letter brief tendered with appell ee’s motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q/A of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, Kendra A. Borrego, Chief Financial Officer of IMPAC MedicalSystems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. 

 

November 19, 2004