alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2793

AN ACT

For the relief of Kris Murty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES FOR KRIS MURTY.

4 For the purpose of receiving reimbursement for relo5 cation expenses under sections 5724 and 5724a of title

6 5, United States Code, Kris Murty of El Paso, Texas, an

7 employee of the Department of the Army, is deemed to

8 have been an employee transferred by the Department of

9 the Army from one official station to another for perma10 nent duty when he relocated from Houston, Texas, to Fort

11 Bliss, Texas, in February 1985.
2

HR 2793 EH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

2 No amount exceeding 10 percent of a payment made

3 pursuant to section 1 may be paid to or received by any

4 agent or attorney in consideration for services rendered

5 in connection with the payment. Any person who violates

6 the provisions of this section shall be guilty of an infrac7 tion and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided

8 under title 18, United States Code.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2793

AN ACT

For the relief of Kris Murty.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CARDPOOL, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v.

PLASTIC JUNGLE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. 

______________________ 

2013-1227

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 12-CV-4182, Judge 

William H. Alsup.

______________________ 

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING 

______________________ 

Before RADER, Chief Judge, REYNA and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges.

RADER, Chief Judge. 

O R D E R

Cardpool, Inc. petitions the court for panel rehearing, 

and has advised the court that as a result of a reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,494,048, the United States 
2 CARDPOOL, INC. v. PLASTIC JUNGLE, INC. 

Patent and Trademark Office deemed patentable, inter 

alia, an amended Claim 1, the sole independent claim 

deemed ineligible below under 35 U.S.C. § 101. On the 

court’s invitation, Plastic Jungle, Inc. n/k/a Cardflo, Inc.

(Plastic Jungle) responded to the petition. Cardpool 

moved for leave to file a reply, and replied after the court 

granted its motion. The parties both request that this 

court vacate its decision, and the district court’s dismissal 

pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6), as moot in light of the 

reexamined claims. 

Because vacatur of the affirmance under FED. R. APP.

P. 36 would not offend the public interest in this case, and 

because both parties agree with such action, the court 

vacates its prior decision and dismisses the appeal. U.S. 

Bancorp Mortg. Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship, 513 U.S. 18, 26 

(1994). 

However, the court finds that it would not be appropriate in this context to vacate the district court’s judgment because Cardpool, the losing party below, caused 

the change in circumstances. See Arizonans for Official 

English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 71–72 (1997) (citing 

Bancorp, 515 U.S. at 23). Thus, this court remands to the 

district court to determine what actions, if any, are appropriate in light of the reexamined claims. 

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

1) The petition for panel rehearing filed by Cardpool 

is granted-in-part. 

2) The court’s decision affirming the district court’s 

judgment is vacated and the appeal is dismissed. 

The matter is remanded to the district court for 

further proceedings.
CARDPOOL, INC.PLASTIC JUNGLE, INC. 3

 FOR THE COURT

April 29, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court
#### Stacy Glennerster, Plaintiff, and Laura Feinstein, Appellant, v Lewis Conley, Jr., Defendant, and Carolee *552Conley et al., Respondents.

[610 NYS2d 820]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Laura Feinstein appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated March 31, 1992, which granted the motions of the defendants A. Byszkiewicz and Carolee Conley to dismiss the complaint based on the plaintiffs failure to establish that she had sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff has failed to raise any triable issues of fact with regard to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2696

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act to provide for the

payment of rewards for information regarding acts of international terrorism in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1993

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act to

provide for the payment of rewards for information regarding acts of international terrorism in the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REWARDS FOR INFORMATION REGARDING

4 ACTS OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM.

5 Section 36 of the State Department Basic Authorities

6 Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708) is amended by striking

7 ‘‘and is primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the

8 United States’’.
2

•HR 2696 IH

Æ
FDIC Quarterly FOIA Report

1st Quarter 2021 (October 1 – December 31, 2020)

1. Number of requests received during quarter: 79

2. Number of requests processed during quarter: 78

3. Number of requests backlogged at end of quarter: 8

4. Status of the FDIC’s ten overall oldest pending FOIA requests from the previous fiscal 

year (i.e., number closed during quarter): Four (4) requests were closed during the 1st

quarter of FY2021
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1044-000]


Riverside Generating Company, L.C.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

March 1, 2001.
    Riverside Generating Company, L.L.C. (Riverside) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Riverside will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions at market-based rates. Riverside 
also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Riverside requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 
CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability by Riverside.
    On February 20, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, 
Tariffs and Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Riverside should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Riverside is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations of 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Riverside's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 22, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5519 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
32.2
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Ajay
Tandon, Director, President and Chief financial Officer of Emissary Capital
Group, Inc., f/k/a Cavalier Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, that
to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annual report on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008  of the Company (the
“Report”):
 
 1.      The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  September
22, 2009
 
 /s/Ajay
Tandon
 Ajay
Tandon
 Director,
President and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard Ray HARRIMON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10536

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 10, 2011.

Susan Cowger, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

On appeal, Richard Ray Harrimon argues that the district court erred in finding that his prior convictions for evading arrest by vehicle were qualifying violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act. However, he correctly concedes that *837this argument is foreclosed under the law of the case doctrine and that he raises the issue only to preserve it for further review. *See United States v. Agofsky,*516 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir.2008). Thus, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motions to dismiss the appeal and for an extension of time to file a brief are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13516-13517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP95-408-039]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing of Refund 
Report

February 28, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 20, 2001, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation Columbia) filed a refund report in the above referenced 
docket, pursuant to

[[Page 13517]]

Section 154.501(e) of the Federal Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations.
    Columbia states that it made a filing on December 15, 2000, 
pursuant to a settlement approved by the Commission in Docket no. RP95-
408 (79 FERC para.61,044), to share gains from the sale of certain 
gathering and products extraction facilities. The Commission approved 
the filing on January 31, 2001. Columbia states that the instant filing 
shows that Columbia made the refund, including interest through the 
date of refund, which was January 22, 2001.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before March 9, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5354 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2009-1368.

#### Hance v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Clermont App. No. CA2008-10-094, 2009-Ohio-2809. On July 29, 2009, appellant filed a notice of *1436pending motion to certify a conflict. Whereas appellant has not notified this court of the decision on the pending motion to certify a conflict,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within 14 days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13715-13716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-915-000]


GPN Pleasant Hill, LLC, GPN Pleasant Hill Operating, LLC; Notice 
of Issuance of Order

March 1, 2001.
    GPN Pleasant Hill Operating, LLC (GPN) submitted for filing a rate

[[Page 13716]]

schedule under which GPN will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions at market-based rates. GPN also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, GPN requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by GPN.
    On February 20, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, 
Tariffs and Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by GPN should file a motion to intervene or 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, GPN 
is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities 
as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any 
security of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption 
is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the 
applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably 
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of GPN's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 22, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5522 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-508]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Availability of Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and 
Environmental Assessment for North Platte National Wildlife Refuge, 
Scottsbluff, NE

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Refuge Improvement Act of 1997, the U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service has published the Draft North Platte National 
Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental 
Assessment. This Plan describes how the FWS intends to manage the North 
Platte NWR for the next 10-15 years.

DATES: Submit written comments by February 8, 2001. All comments need 
to be addressed to: Brad McKinney, Refuge Manage, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, North Platte National Wildlife Refuge, 115 Railway 
Street, Suite C109, Scottsbluff, NE 69363-1346.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the Draft Plan may be obtained by writing to U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, North Platte NWR, 115 Railway Street, Suite 
C109, Scottsbluff, NE 69363-1346 or from http://www.r6.fws.gov/larp/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad McKinney, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, North Platte NWR, 115 Railway Street, Suite C109, Scottsbluff, 
NE <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="482a3a292c1717252b232126262d31082e3f3b662f273e">[email protected]</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 2,909-acre North Platte National 
Wildlife Refuge is located in the Nebraska Panhandle, within the 
Central Flyway and Kansas/Platte Rivers ecosystem, about eight miles 
north of the city of Scottsbluff, NE. This Refuge is superimposed over 
or adjoining three Bureau of Reclamation reservoirs consisting of Lake 
Minatare, Winters Creek Lake, and Lake Alice. The North Platte NWR was 
established by Executive Order in 1916 as a ``preserve and breeding 
ground for native birds.'' Since the Refuge is superimposed over Bureau 
lands, it remains subordinate to ``Reclamation service uses.'' 
Management of the North Platte NWR will be guided by its purpose to 
provide a preserve and breeding ground for migratory birds as well as 
to provide for the life requirements of other species of wildlife, 
subject to Bureau uses, and to provide compatible, high quality 
environmental education and wildlife-oriented recreational 
opportunities.

    Dated: January 3, 2001.
John A. Blankenship,
Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. 01-508 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Smith *v.*The State.

Bish, J.

1. While the words “ lager heer ” in their ordinary use and acceptation may sufficiently indicate an intoxicating liquor to warrant a conviction o£ selling liquor of that character, when the proof shows a sale of lager heer and nothing more (Black, Intoxicating Liquors, § 17), yet where in a given case-*759there was affirmative testimony to the effect that a liquid which contained not exceeding two per cent, of alcohol would not intoxicate, and that the identical bottle of liquid which the accused sold, and upon the sale of which the question of his guilt or innocence turned, did not contain more than two per cent, of alcohol, it was, although there was other testimony to the effect that this identical liquid was lager beer, erroneous to charge generally that all lager beer is intoxicating.

Argued June 17,

Decided July 18, 1901.

Indictment for selling liquor. Before Judge Adams. City court of Dublin. April 22, 1901.

*Howard & Armistead,*for plaintiff in error.

*F. G. Corker, solicitor,*contra.

2. It was in such a case erroneous to admit hearsay testimony to the effect that lager beer contains from two to six per cent, of alcohol; but, in view of the ruling above announced, it would seem that admitting such testimony was not harmful to the accused.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

December 8, 2023

SC-2023-0348

Anthony D. Powers and Gweneth D. Powers v. Chadwell Homes, LLC 

(Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-22-138).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the ruling on the application for rehearing filed in this 

case and indicated below was entered in this cause on December 8, 2023:

Application Overruled. No Opinion. Sellers, J. -- Parker, C.J., 

and Shaw, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. Wise, J., recuses herself.

WHEREAS, the appeal in the above referenced cause has been duly 

submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the 

judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on October 13, 2023:

Affirmed. No Opinion. Sellers, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, 

Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. Wise, J., recuses herself.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama