T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P AU L P E S QU E I R A, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C I T Y O F L OS AN GE L E S ; L OS AN GELE S P OLI CE DEPART M ENT; W IL L IA M J. B R A T T O N , i n h i s i nd i vi du al a n do f f i c i a l c ap a c i ty ; J AM ES M C D O N N E L L , i n hi s of f i c i a l a nd i n d i v i d u a l c ap a c i ty ; GE OR GE GA S C ON , i n h i s i n d i v i d u al an do ffi ci al cap aci ty; S H A R O N K . P A P A , i n he ri ndi vi dua l a nd o f f ic ia l c ap a c ity , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 56749 D . C . N o. 2: 05 -c v-02 95 5-S JO -E ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 9, 2011 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia 

# FI LED MA R 24 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

B efo re: R Y M E R , C A L L A H A N , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C on strui ng the di sput ed fa ct s i n the l i gh tm ostfavo rabl e t o P aul P es qu ei ra , se e E ngv. C oo ley , 55 2 F . 3d 10 62 , 10 71 –7 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ), and app l yi ng the fi vep a rt te s t f

o raF ir s t A m e n d m e n t r e ta lia tio n c la im u n d e r4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 , se e D e s r oc he rs v . C i t

yof San B e rnardi no , 5 7 2 F . 3 d7 0 3 , 7 0 8

– 0 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) , we h o ldth a t P e s q u e ir ah a s f a ile dto a lle g e ac o g n iz ab le r e ta lia tio n c la im u n d e r§ 1 9 8 3 . Se e G ar c e t t iv . C e bal los , 54 7 U . S . 41 0, 42 2– 23 (200 6). P es qu ei raconceded that h i s resp o n si b i l i t i es i n cl u d ed su p erv i si n g em p l o yees. H e fi l ed th e co m p l ai n tag ai n st C apt a i n O rt e gaw i thi n the L os A nge l e s P ol i c e D e pa rtm e nt . A nd he s i gne d the com pl ai ntas C apt ai n O rt ega’ s “ C om m andi ng O ff i ce r. ” G i ven these un di sput ed fa ct s, w e c on cl ud e thatP es qu ei ra ’ s c om pl ai ntw as m ade i n h i s profe ss i on al s u p e rv is o ryc ap a c itya s aC ap ta in I I I a t th e H o lle n b e c kD iv is io n . See Fre i tagv. Ayers , 468 F . 3d 528, 546 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . B e c aus e the r e i s no ge nui ne i s s ue of m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rP e s q u e ir aw a s s p e a k in g a s ap r iv a te c itiz e n , a s is r e q u ir e df

o ra§ 1 9 8 3 c la im , s e e C e bal los , 54 7 U . S . at42 2– 23 , the di stri ctcourt p r o p e r lyg r a n te ds u m m a ryju d g m e n t to A p p e lle e s , s e e H uppe r t v . C i t yof P i t t s bur gh , 5 7 4 F .3 d6 9 6 , 6 9 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . B ecau se w e h o l dth atP esq u ei ra h as n o tal l eg ed a v i o l at i o n o f h i s F i rst A m endm entri gh t s, w e do n otaddres s hi s c l ai m s f or Mo n e ll l i abi l i tya nd3

c o n s tru c tiv e d is c h a r g e . See C i t y of L os A ng eles v. H

el ler , 475 U . S . 796, 799 ( 1 9 8 6 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) ; B rooks v . C i t y of Sa n Mateo , 22 9 F . 3d 91 7, 93 0 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). AF F I RME D.