alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1a





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Limco-Piedmont Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bob Koch, Co-Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert KochCo-Chief
      Executive Officer




April 29,
2009







Exhibit
32.1b




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Limco-Piedmont Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Udi Netivi,
Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Udi NetiviCo-Chief
      Executive Officer




April 29,
2009
2009-1162.

#### State v. Huber.

Miami App. No. 2008 CA 15, 2009-Ohio-2541.
voxx-ex105_162.htm





 

 
 
Exhibit 10.5

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 

 

THIS AMENDMENT, made effective March 1, 2011, by and between Audio Products International Corp., a company incorporated pursuant to the laws of Ontario (“API”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Klipsch Group, Inc. (“KGI”) and Oscar Bernardo (“Employee”).

 

WITNESSETH THAT:

 

WHEREAS, Audiovox Corporation (“Audiovox”), through its wholly owned subsidiary, Soundtech LLC, has purchased or will purchase all of the issued and outstanding stock of KGI; and 

 

WHEREAS, API and Employee have executed an Agreement effective August 8, 2006 and Amendment effective July 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”), whereby Employee is employed by API; and 

 

WHEREAS, Employee desires to continue in the employ of API and has agreed to amend and add a certain provision to the Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of continued employment and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and adequate consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1.Section 2.7 as follows is added to the Agreement:

 


	
 
	
2.7
	
Employee shall have the following described Put Option:




 

Commencing on March 1, 2011, the cumulative after tax net profit or loss of the KGI will be calculated on a monthly basis according to GAAP and will bear interest at the same per annum rate that Audiovox is receiving from its lead bank.

 

Employee may at the end of any month following the 30th month anniversary of the definitive agreement between Soundtech LLC and KGI, request KGI to pay him in one lump sum up to 80% of .25% of the aggregate cumulative after tax net profit or loss of KGI (the “Put Price”), and KGI will pay such amount to Employee.  Such a request may not be made within 60 months of Employee’s previous request.

 

Any unpaid Put Price will be paid promptly to Employee or his heirs as the case may be if Employee’s employment is terminated for any reason.




 





 

 
 
Illustration (not accounting for interest):

 


	
 
	

	
Commencement value-0-





	
 
	

	
Net profits after 12 months$10,000,000





	
 
	

	
Put Price (.25%)$25,000





	
 
	

	
Net loss in 13th month$1,000,000





	
 
	

	
Put Price (.25%)$22,500




 

 


	
 
	
2.
	
All other terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement not specifically amended by this Second Amendment shall remain in full force and effect, and shall be incorporated by reference.




 


	
 
	
3.
	
The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective March 1, 2011. 




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Second Amendment. 

 

 

AUDIO PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL

 

By: /s/ Fred Klipsch

Fred Klipsch, CEO

 

 

/s/ Oscar Bernardo

Oscar Bernardo, Employee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FIRST
QUARTER 1998 10-Q OF ISP HOLDINGS INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                          16,319
<SECURITIES>                                   253,449
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    115,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               553,637
<PP&E>                                         523,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,545,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          387,982
<BONDS>                                        615,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,545,962
<SALES>                                        200,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,703
<CGS>                                          119,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,672
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

RAMP Series 2007-RS2 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi    
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard A. Baron, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of eResearchTechnology, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
1

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  November 5, 2007 /s/ Richard A. Baron   Richard A Baron,   Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary   
2
2009-1681.

#### Ferguson v. Bradshaw.

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration of petitioner’s motion for findings of fact and conclusions of law,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Eric Artz, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-K of Urban Outfitters, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended January 31, 2010
(the Form 10-K), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                    
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: April 1, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    ERIC
ARTZ                   
|                    |  |     |  | Eric Artz (Chief Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2839 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2839

To fix rates of pay for Members of Congress at the levels which were in 
  effect immediately before the enactment of the Ethics Reform Act of 
                                 1989.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1993

Mr. Everett (for himself and Mr. Jacobs) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred jointly to the Committees on Post Office and Civil 
Service, House Administration, the Judiciary, Ways and Means, and Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To fix rates of pay for Members of Congress at the levels which were in 
  effect immediately before the enactment of the Ethics Reform Act of 
                                 1989.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RATES OF PAY.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) The annual rate of pay for--
            ``(1) each Senator, Member of the House of Representatives, 
        and Delegate to the House of Representatives, and the Resident 
        Commissioner from Puerto Rico,
            ``(2) the President pro tempore of the Senate, the majority 
        leader and the minority leader of the Senate, and the majority 
        leader and the minority leader of the House of Representatives, 
        and
            ``(3) the Speaker of the House of Representatives,
shall be the rate payable for each of those positions, respectively, as 
of November 29, 1989.''.

SEC. 2. COORDINATION WITH OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.

    The second sentence of section 603 of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 
(2 U.S.C. 31-1 note) and the second sentence of section 804(f) of such 
Act (Public Law 101-194; 103 Stat. 1778) are repealed.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendments made by this Act shall become 
effective as of the beginning of the first Congress commencing after 
the first election of Representatives which occurs after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Definitions.--For the purpose of this section, the term 
``election of Representatives'' shall have the meaning given such term 
by section 225(i)(4)(B) of the Federal Salary Act of 1967 (2 U.S.C. 
359(4)(B)).

                                 <all>
```
EX-35.2
(logo) M&T Bank
Understanding what's important



WELLS FARGO - BAYVIEW
2007-A
9062 OLD ANNAPOLIS ROAD
COLUMBIA, MD 21045
COMPLIANCE MANAGER



Annual Statement of Compliance


For The Fiscal Year 2007

1. A review of the activities of the Seller Servicer during the preceding
   calendar year and of performance according to the Seller Servicer contract
   has been made with the undersigned officer's supervision, and

2. To the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
   the Seller Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the guides for
   such year, or if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such
   obligation, such default is listed below:


Known Default           Status          Steps Being Taken to Cure Default


None



Seller Servicer: M&T Bank

By: /s/ Claudia L. Heath
Name: Claudia L. Heath
Title: Vice President / Compliance Manager
Date: March 14, 2008


P.O. Box 1288, Buffalo, NY 14240, 716 626 7010  800 724 2224
Mortgage account information, just a click away. www.mtb.com
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00903

- CR

Monisha Monique WASHINGTON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR11334W Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proc edure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record
under these rules.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be dismissed p ursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed by January 2, 2019 , showing appellant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State ,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification

issue.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of December, 2018

.___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
DISCIPLINARY CASES

2010-0253.

#### Columbus Bar Assn. v. Williams.

On February 8, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed a final report in the office of the Clerk of this court pursuant to BCGD Proc. Reg. 11(D), in which it accepted the agreement entered into by relator, Columbus Bar Association, and respondent, Lewis Eugene Williams. The agreement set forth the misconduct and the agreed, recommended sanction of a two-year suspension with the entire suspension stayed. The board recommended that the agreement be accepted. The court, sua sponte, issued an order waiving the issuance of a show cause order, and this matter was submitted to the court on the report and record filed by the board.

It has come to the court’s attention that the affidavit submitted by respondent does not include a statement that he agreed to the sanction recommended by the board, as required by BCGD Proc.Reg. 11(B)(4). It is hereby ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for further proceedings. Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court. Costs to abide final determination of the case.

It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1
<CASH>                                                 1,917
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         14,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                            (799)
<INVENTORY>                                            1,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      17,637
<PP&E>                                                 5,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (1,048)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        30,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 17,113
<BONDS>                                                7,790 <F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                  41
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          30,680
<SALES>                                               40,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      40,851
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         39,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         101 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          286
<INCOME-TAX>                                              66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      119
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             119
<EPS-BASIC>                                              .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .03
<FN>
<F1> Mortgages And Similar Debt
<F2> Minority Interest
</FN>



</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

The Boeing Company ) 

) 

Under Contract No. N00030-07-C-0002 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59584 

Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. 

Seth H. Locke, Esq. 

Perkins Coie 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Carson, CA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 17 May 2016 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59584, Appeal of The Boeing 

Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals