alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31,
      2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Richard T. Schumacher, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
      United States Code) that:





(1)  The
      Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 22, 2006
            */s/ Richard T.
              Schumacher*Richard T. SchumacherPresident and Chief Executive
              Officer(Principal Executive Officer)








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
FDIC as Receiver for Superior - 6004

Daye of Payment Payment Amount

6/27/2011 140,457,000.00

12/10/2010 24,000,000.0012/10/2009 24,000,000.0012/10/2008 24,000,000.0012/10/2007 24,000,000.0012/11/2006 24,000,000.0012/12/2005 24,000,000.0012/10/2004 24,000,000.0012/10/2003 24,000,000.0012/10/2002 24,000,000.0012/10/2001 100,000,000.00
**Exhibit 13.1**

  

   

**Officer Certifications Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

  

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte S.A., a sociedad anónima organized under the laws of Argentina (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

 

 

 Date: May 12, 2015.

 

/s/ Edgardo Alberto Volosin         

Name: Edgardo Alberto Volosin

 Title: Chief Executive Officer

  

 Date: May 12, 2015.

 

/s/ Leandro Carlos Montero          

Name: Leandro Carlos Montero

 Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 248 (Thursday, December 27, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-55535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80


Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 72 to 80, 
revised as of July 1, 2001, Sec. 80.81 is corrected by revising 
paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec. 80.81  Enforcement exemptions for California gasoline.

* * * * *
    (a) The requirements of subparts D, E, F and J of this part are 
modified in accordance with the provisions contained in this section in 
the case of California gasoline.
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 01-55535 Filed 12-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

          - [A-122-822, A-122-823] 

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

March 1, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Abdelali Elouaradia, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1374. 

## The Applicable Statute 

Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the current regulations, codified at 19 CFR part 351 (2000). 

## Background 

Based on timely requests by petitioners and respondents in both proceedings, the Department published its initiation of this antidumping duty administrative review covering the period of August 1, 1999 through July 31, 2000 (65 FR 58733) on October 2, 2000. 

## Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results 

Due to the complex issues involved with this case, we find that it is not practicable to make a preliminary determination by the current deadline of May 3, 2001. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and section 351.213(h)(2) of the Department's regulations, the Department is extending the time limits for the preliminary results for 120 days, until no later than August 31, 2001. 

Dated: February 23, 2001. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.

[FR Doc. 01-5016 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2009-0063.

#### State v. Lawson.

Clermont App. No. CA2007-12-116, 2008-Ohio-6066.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
dated January 26, 1998 on Form S-8 regarding the Amended and Restated 1993 Stock
Option Plan and in Registration Statement No. 333-10775 on Form S-3 of our
report on the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995 included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Monterey Pasta Company for the year ended December 28, 1997.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
 
March 25, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10Q for the period ending September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,984
<SECURITIES>                                    76,019
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,149
<PP&E>                                               0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,446
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,264)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Disclosure not required on interim financial statements.
<F2>Computation not applicable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Matthew John SHORTT, Appellant, v. DICK CLARK’S AB THEATRE, LLC, Appellee.

No. 10-2631.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 22, 2011.

Filed: March 1, 2011.

Matthew John Shortt, Titusville, FL, pro se.

Brett W. Roubal, Baird *&*Lightner, Springfield, MO, for Appellee.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Shortt appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his wrongful termination and retaliation suit against his former employer. Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, *see Washburn v. Soper,*319 F.3d 338, 340-41 (8th Cir.2003) (standard of review), we conclude that Shortt failed to create a trialworthy issue as to whether he was discharged in retaliation for voicing complaints about wages and coworkers. We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying recon*10sideration. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of STARLIMS Technologies Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Chaim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Chaim Friedman *
Chaim Friedman
Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2008

*     The originally executed copy of
this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made
available for inspection upon request.



---

---
#### Robert R. LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; Shon Barr, Police Office PO #1439; Montgomery County Police Department, 1st District; Montgomery County Maryland Government; Douglas M. Duncan, Montgomery County “Executive”, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-7591.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 28, 2007.

Decided: March 27, 2007.

Robert R. Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, County Attorney’s Office, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert R. Lawrence appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have *273reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Lawrence v. Montgomery County,*No. 8:05-cv-02051-AW (D.Md. Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2896 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 28, 2018 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To require disclosure by lobbyists of convictions for bribery, 

extortion, embezzlement, illegal kickbacks, tax evasion, 

fraud, conflicts of interest, making false statements, perjury, or money laundering. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2896 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice Against Cor3 ruption on K Street Act of 2018’’ or the ‘‘JACK Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF CORRUPT MALPRACTICE BY LOB5 BYISTS. 

6 (a) REGISTRATION.—Section 4(b) of the Lobbying 

7 Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1603(b)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(7) for any listed lobbyist who was convicted 

15 in a Federal or State court of an offense involving 

16 bribery, extortion, embezzlement, an illegal kickback, 

17 tax evasion, fraud, a conflict of interest, making a 

18 false statement, perjury, or money laundering, the 

19 date of the conviction and a description of the of20 fense.’’. 

21 (b) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Section 5(b) of the Lob22 bying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1604(b)) is 

23 amended— 

24 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

25 end; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

S 2896 RFH

1 (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(6) for any listed lobbyist who was convicted 

5 in a Federal or State court of an offense involving 

6 bribery, extortion, embezzlement, an illegal kickback, 

7 tax evasion, fraud, a conflict of interest, making a 

8 false statement, perjury, or money laundering, the 

9 date of the conviction and a description of the of10 fense.’’. 

Passed the Senate August 23, 2018. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Case number: 01-14-00452-CV

Style: Cameron International Corporation, Appellant v. Jeremy Guillory, Appellee

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing 

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Justice Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.

Date: October 23, 2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2291 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2291

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 
home office expenses where the taxpayer's sole fixed business location 
                            is in the home.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1993

  Mr. Grams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 
home office expenses where the taxpayer's sole fixed business location 
                            is in the home.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) subparagraph 
(A) of section 280A(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to certain business use) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) as the principal place of business for any 
                trade or business of the taxpayer or as the sole fixed 
                location of business for any trade or business of the 
                taxpayer,''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to all taxable 
years whether beginning before, on, or after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### Todd Curtis MYERS, Appellant, v. ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-2829.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 29, 2010.

Filed: Feb. 17, 2011.

*951Todd Curtis Myers, Lino Lakes, MN, pro se.

Robert D. Goodell, Assistant County Attorney, Anoka, MN, for Appellees.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota inmate Todd Myers appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the Anoka County Sheriff, Detention Deputy Andrew Schroeder, and unnamed Nursing Staff and “Dr. on Call” defendants for causing the delayed medical treatment of a broken jaw Myers suffered during an assault by another inmate at the Anoka County Jail.

After careful *de novo*review of the record, we conclude that the district court (i) did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Myers’s claims against the unnamed medical staff defendants because he failed to identify and serve those defendants for more than a year after filing this action, *see*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); (ii) properly granted summary judgment in favor of Deputy Schroeder because, even crediting Myers’s disputed testimony that he told Schroeder immediately after the assault that he needed to see a doctor or nurse because his jaw and face hurt, Myers admitted that he complained of pain in his jaw to a nurse “at the next Med line” and received some medical attention, so any failure by Schroeder to seek medical attention for Myers was not the cause of any delay in providing the necessary treatment; and (iii) properly dismissed the official capacity claims because Myers failed to identify any Anoka County policy that violated his constitutional rights. Nor did the district court abuse its discretion in denying Myers’s request for the appointment of counsel. *See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail,*437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir.2006).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
#### 02 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. TAIWAN SUMIDA ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2006-1436.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 21, 2007.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. RApp. P. 42(b).
OMB NUMBER: 3064-0150 

 EXPIRATION DATE: 9/20/2007 

FDIC 7200/09 (9-04) This form is not valid unless the OMB Clearance Number is displayed 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

DECLARATION FOR TESTAMENTARY DEPOSIT 

(MULTIPLE GRANTORS)

INSTRUCTIONS: Please type or print all information legibly, date, and sign. 

Financial Institution: 

Closing Date: 

Account Number: 

Group Number: 

1. We, the undersigned, declare that we are the Grantors of the above account (the “Account”) and constitute all of the persons

 who own all of the funds in the Account according to the following percentages: 

 NAME OF GRANTORS 

PERCENTAGE OF FUNDS 

CONTRIBUTED TO THIS ACCOUNT 

(A) 

(B) 

 Note: Percentages must equal 100% 

 

2. We further declare that our intent in establishing the Account was to provide that the funds in the Account, upon 

our deaths, would be owned by the beneficiaries identified below. 

3. The beneficiaries of the account and the relationship of each of them to each of the undersigned are as follows: 

NAME OF BENEFICIARY RELATIONSHIP TO (A) RELATIONSHIP TO (B) 

 

 

4. Each of the above-named beneficiaries is presently living. If any beneficiary is deceased, please indicate name and date of death: 

NAME DATE OF DEATH 

 

 

5. If the funds in this Account were placed by you as grantors under a written trust agreement, other than the account signature card, 

attach a true, exact and complete copy of the trust agreement as in effect on the closing date. Note: Be sure to attach this 

Declaration to the copy of the Trust. 

6. This declaration is made to induce the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to pay insurance covering the Account to the extent 

that the Account is covered by insurance. 

7. This declaration, under penalty of perjury, is executed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: . 

 

Signature of Grantor Signature of Grantor 

THE PENALTY FOR KNOWINGLY MAKING OR INVITING RELIANCE ON ANY FALSE, FORGED OR COUNTERFEIT STATEMENT, DOCUMENT 

OR THING FOR THE PURPOSE OF INFLUENCING IN ANY WAY THE ACTION OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IS A 

FINE OF NOT MORE THAN $1,000,000 OR IMPRISONMENT FOR NOT MORE THAN THIRTY YEARS OR BOTH (18 U.S.C. § 1007). 

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT NOTICE 

The information collected is required for the determination of insured deposits when a financial institution closes in accordance to Deposit Insurance Rules and 

Regulations. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1/2 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, 

searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding 

this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Paper Reduction Act Clearance 

Officer, Legal Division, Room MB-3082, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429.
FDIC Quarterly FOIA Report

4th Quarter 2020 (July 1 – September 30, 2020)

1. Number of requests received during quarter: 88

2. Number of requests processed during quarter: 81

3. Number of requests backlogged at end of quarter: 9

4. Status of the FDIC’s ten overall oldest pending FOIA requests from the previous fiscal 

year (i.e., number closed during quarter): Nine (9) requests were closed during the 1st

quarter of FY2020