Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2001 / Notices 13529

eligibility for units to receive Uplift

payments.

It is requested that the revisions

become effective on the earlier of two

days following a Commission order

approving the changes, or April 23,

2001, sixty days after the filing.

The Participants Committee states

that copies of these materials were sent

to the New England state governors and

regulatory commissions and the

Participants in NEPOOL.

Comment date: March 15, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

30. American Electric Power Service

Corporation

[Docket No. OA01–4–000]

Take notice that on February 20, 2001,

American Electric Power Service

Corporation, on behalf of the operating

companies of the American Electric

Power System (AEP) submitted for filing

updated Procedures for Implementation

of FERC Standards of Conduct.

AEP requests an effective date of

February 20, 2001.

Copies of AEP’s filing have been

served upon AEP’s transmission

customers and the public service

commissions of Arkansas, Indiana,

Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio,

Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West

Virginia and the Oklahoma Corporation

Commission.

Comment date: March 22, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

31. Sempra Energy

[Docket No. ER01–1193–000]

Take notice that on February 16, 2001,

Sempra Energy tendered for filing a

request for withdrawal of its February 7,

2001, Petition for Waivers, and Blanket

approvals in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: March 9, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

32. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. ER01–814–001]

Take notice that on February 22, 2001,

PacifiCorp tendered for filing, an

amendment to its original filing in

accordance with 18 CFR Part 35 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

Copies of this filing were supplied to

the Washington Utilities and

Transportation Commission and the

Public Utility Commission of Oregon.

Comment date: March 15, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

33. Illinois Power Company and

Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.

[Docket No. EC01–71–000]

Take notice that on February 22, 2001,

Illinois Power Company (Illinois Power)

and Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.

(Dynegy Midwest) filed a joint

application under Section 203 of the

Federal Power Act requesting the

Commission to authorize the indirect

transfer of generation-related facilities

consisting of generator step-up and

station power transformers with

associated generation lead lines,

switches, circuit breakers and

foundations from Illinois Power to

Dynegy Midwest.

Comment date: March 15, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

34. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–894–002]

Take notice that on February 20, 2001,

Entergy Services, Inc. (Entergy), on

behalf of the Entergy Operating

Companies, tendered for filing the Third

Revised Network Integration

Transmission Service Agreement

(NITSA) between Entergy and East

Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., Sam

Rayburn G&T Electric Cooperative, Inc.,

and Tex-La Electric Cooperative, Inc., as

an amendment to its January 5, 2001

filing in Docket No. ER01–894–000. The

Third Revised NITSA adds the Line No.

81 Settlement Agreement between

Jasper-Newton Electric Cooperative, Inc.

and Entergy, dated February 1, 2001, to

the NITSA.

Comment date: March 13, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest such filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 385.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of these filings are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection. This filing may also be

viewed on the Internet at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–5335 Filed 3–5–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–6940–8]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit

Program; Petition for Objection to

State Operating Permit for Fort James

Camas Mill, Camas, Washington

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition

to object to state operating permit.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act

Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d),

the EPA Administrator is hereby

granting in part and denying in part a

petition to object to a State operating

permit issued by the Washington

Department of Ecology (Ecology) to Fort

James Camas Mill, Camas, Washington.

This order constitutes final action on

the petition submitted by Mr. Carl D.

Larkins. Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of

the Clean Air Act (Act), petitioner may

seek judicial review in the United States

Court of Appeals for the appropriate

circuit within 60 days of this decision

under section 307 of the Act.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the final order, the

petition, and all pertinent information

relating thereto are on file at the

following location: Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of

Air Quality, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,

Washington 98101. The final order is

also available electronically at the

following address: http://www.epa.gov/

ttn/oarpg/t5sn.html

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William M. Hedgebeth, Office of Air

Quality, EPA Region 10, telephone (206)

553–1059, e-mail

hedgebeth.william@epa.gov. Interested

parties may also contact the Washington

Department of Ecology, Industrial

Section, 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey,

Washington 98503, mailing address P.O.

Box 47600, Olympia, Washington

98504–7600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean

Air Act affords EPA the opportunity for

a 45-day period to review, and object to

as appropriate, operating permits

proposed by State permitting

authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act

authorizes any person to petition the

EPA Administrator within 60 days after

13530 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2001 / Notices

1The description on page 5 of the Administrator’s

order of the procedures for resolving the objection

is in error. As provided in 40 CFR 70.7(g)(4),

Ecology has 90 days from the receipt of the order

to resolve the objection issues, not two 90 day

periods.

the expiration of this review period to

object to State operating permits if EPA

has not done so. Petitions must be based

only on objections to the permit that

were raised with reasonable specificity

during the public comment period

provided by the State, unless the

petitioner demonstrates that it was

impracticable to raise these issues

during the comment period or the

grounds for the issues arose after this

period.

Mr. Carl D. Larkins submitted a

petition to the Administrator on

November 24, 1999, seeking EPA’s

objection to the operating permit issued

to Fort James Camas Mill, Camas,

Washington. The petitioner maintains

that the Fort James Camas Mill

operating permit is inconsistent with

the Act because the permit fails to: (1)

provide sufficient basis for providing

compliance assurance for certain permit

conditions; and (2) provide sufficient

basis for using surrogate parameters as

compliance indicators in certain permit

conditions. The order granting in part

and denying in part this petition

explains the reasons behind EPA’s

conclusion that: (1) Petitioner

adequately demonstrated in certain

instances that the Fort James Camas Mill

permit did not satisfy all the

requirements of 40 CFR Part 70; and (2)

petitioner in other instances failed to

demonstrate that the Fort James Camas

Mill permit does not assure compliance

with the Clean Air Act on the grounds

raised.

Pursuant to sections 505(b)and 505(e)

of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7661d(b)

and (e)) and 40 CFR 70.7(g) and 70.8(d),

Ecology has 90 days from the receipt of

the Administrator’s order to resolve the

objections identified in sections C(1),

C(2), C(5), C(8), C(12), C(15), D(2), and

D(5) of the order, and submit a proposed

determination of termination,

modification, or revocation and

reissuance of the Fort James Title V

permit in accordance with EPA’s

objection.1

Dated: January 19, 2001.

Charles E. Findley,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region X.

[FR Doc. 01–5415 Filed 3–5–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

for Extension Under Delegated

Authority; Comments Requested.

February 21, 2001.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning: (a)

Whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before May 7, 2001. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Les

Smith, Federal Communications

Commissions, Room 1 A–804, 445

Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC

20554 or via the Internet to

lesmith@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collections contact Les

Smith at (202) 418–0217 or via the

Internet at lesmith@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control Number: 3060–0570.

Title: Section 76.982 Continuation of

rate agreements.

Form Number: n/a.

Type of Review: Extension of

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, State, Local or Tribal

Government.

Number of Respondents: 25.

Estimated Time Per Response: 0.5

hours.

Total Annual Burden: 13 hours.

Total Annual Costs: $2,600.00.

Needs and Uses: The information

collection requirements reported under

this control number enable the

Commission to determine the extent of

rate regulation agreements that pre-date

the Cable Television Consumer

Protection and Competition Act of 1992

and that are still in effect.

OMB Control Number: 3060–0609.

Title: Section 76.934(e) Petitions for

Extension of Time.

Form Number: n/a.

Type of Review: Extension of

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, State, Local or Tribal

Government.

Number of Respondents: 35.

Estimated Time Per Response: 4

hours.

Total Annual Burden: 140 hours.

Total Annual Costs: $84,000.00.

Needs and Uses: The information

collection requirements reported under

this control number are used by the

Commission to grant temporary relief to

small systems who demonstrate a need

for an extension of time to come into

compliance with rate regulation.

OMB Control Number: 3060–0562.

Title: Section 76.916 Petition for

Recertification.

Form Number: n/a.

Type of Review: Extension of

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, State, Local or Tribal

Government.

Number of Respondents: 10.

Estimated Time Per Response: 10.

Total Annual Burden: 100 hours.

Total Annual Costs: $6,530.00.

Needs and Uses: The information

collection requirements reported under

this control number are used by the

Commission to implement section

76.916 Petition for Recertification, by

franchising authorities wishing to

request certification after its requests for

certification have been revoked or

denied.

OMB Control Number: 3060–0610.

Title: Section 76.916 Notice to

Commission of Rate Change While

Complaint Pending.

Form Number: n/a.

Type of Review: Extension of

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.