alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NO. 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, William Lay, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of First Trinity Financial Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 26, 2008 By:  /s/ William Lay    William Lay, Secretary/Treasurer and    Chief Financial Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

446 

CAF 14-00975 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF DARIO R. PEREZ, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KARIN C. JOHNSON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

 

DARIO R. PEREZ, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.

WELCH & ZINK, CORNING (COLLEEN G. ZINK OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County

(Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered October 15, 2013 in a proceeding

pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied petitioner’s

objection to the order of the Support Magistrate. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act

article 4, petitioner father appeals from an order denying his

objection to the order of the Support Magistrate that denied his

petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation. 

We affirm. The Support Magistrate’s findings are entitled to great

deference (see Matter of Fragola v Alfaro, 45 AD3d 684, 685), and we

conclude that the record supports the determination that the father

“failed to demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances that

would justify a downward modification of his support obligation

because he [did not present sufficient] ‘evidence establishing that he

diligently sought re-employment commensurate with his former

employment’ ” (Matter of Greene v Hanson, 100 AD3d 1558, 1558; see

Matter of Leonardo v Leonardo, 94 AD3d 1452, 1453, lv denied 19 NY3d

807). We have considered the father’s remaining contentions and

conclude that they are without merit.

Entered: May 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mitsuo Kojima, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horiyoshi Worldwide
      Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Horiyoshi Worldwide Inc.                                                               

Dated: April 8, 2011



| | /s/ Mitsuo Kojima                              
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Mitsuo Kojima                                  
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
| | Horiyoshi Worldwide Inc.                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Horiyoshi
Worldwide Inc. and will be retained by Horiyoshi Worldwide Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                       CNG NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS  FEE PLAN
                                         
        The CNG Nonemployee Directors  Fee Plan, as amended and restated

   effective October 1, 1996, and as subsequently amended by a First Amendment

   thereto, is hereby further amended as follows:

        1.   The following new subparagraph (e) is added to paragraph 3:

                     (e) Effective April 1, 1998, any Director of the Company,
                    by giving notice to the Secretary of the Company, may elect
                    to defer all or a portion of the payment of that portion of
                    the Director s annual fees which are payable in CTG Common
                    Stock, which he will earn subsequent to the date on which
                    such notice is given.  Such election may be revoked by the
                    Director giving written notice to the Secretary as to such
                    fees payable in CTG Common Stock earned subsequent to such
                    revocation.  In the event that a Director of the Company
                    defers all or a portion of the payment of such fees payable
                    in CTG Common Stock, then a separate subaccount shall be
                    established under Account B for such Director relating to
                    such deferrals.  Such deferrals shall be deemed to be
                    invested in CTG Common Stock, and any deemed dividends shall
                    be deemed to purchase additional shares thereof.  The
                    payment of such subaccount shall be in accordance with the
                    election of the Director specifying the terms and conditions
                    for the payment of deferred fees generally. 
           
               2.   Except as hereinabove modified and amended, the Directors 

          Fee Plan, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation hereby

          executes this Second Amendment this 24th day of March, 1998.



          Witness:                         CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION



          Erin Dombkowski                  By:  R. L. Babcock
          ----------------------------     ------------------------------------
                                             Its  <PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          87,841
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   22,959
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     847,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                958,436
<PP&E>                          98,682
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,060,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,357,884
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        101
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,297,015)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,060,768
<SALES>                         133,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                133,306
<CGS>                           128,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   219,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              24,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (239,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (239,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (239,535)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.02)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from JWH Global
Trust for the first quarter of 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001027099
<NAME> JWH GLOBAL TRUST
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      98,247,078
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  751,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            98,998,190
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,998,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,348,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,649,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,998,190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               558,966
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,644,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,085,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,085,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,085,640)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.51)
        

</TABLE>
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:       September 21, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Michael      Metter     |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Michael      Metter              |   |
|                                 |   | Principal      Executive Officer |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>0000912084
<NAME>IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. - 1997
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,224,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                 248,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,163,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        704,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                     210,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,163,677
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186,945
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33


</TABLE>
#### Davis *v.*The State.

Submitted May 21,

Decided July 18, 1901.

Indictment for concealed weapon — certiorari. Before Judge Hart. Greene superior court. March 14, 1901.

*James B. Park Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*PL. G. Lewis, solicitor-general,*and *James Davison,*contra.

Lewis, J.

Where one on trial for carrying a concealed pistol stated to the jury in his defense that he “ did not own a pistol, and never carried one in his life,” and a witness in his behalf undertook to testify to the same effect, evidence that the accused had, on an occasion previous to that under investigation, openly carried a pistol, was irrelevant, for it related to a matter not germane to the issue ; but admitting such evidence will not be held cause for a new trial, when the guilt of the accused was distinctly sworn to by eye-witnesses, and it is manifest from the record that the conviction rested upon the fact that the jury believed these witnesses in preference to others whose testimony related to the main fact, and the evidence illegally admitted could in no possible view have had the effect of impeaching or discrediting them.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
    for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the
    Report), fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | 2) the information contained in the Companys Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                    



| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul B. Murphy, Jr.             
| |                                     
| | Paul B. Murphy, Jr.                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euramax International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Scott Vansant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/R. SCOTT VANSANT                                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|R. Scott Vansant
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
November 10, 2003 |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EX-34.9
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Members
Regulus Group LLC:


We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

February 12, 2008


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
EXHIBIT 11

                     BOSTON BIOMEDICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE

                             WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES




                                                    Quarter Ended March 31,
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                    1997              1996
                                              ---------------  -----------------

Average common stock outstanding                   4,380,024          2,560,417

Net effect of dilutive common stock
   equivalents-based on treasury stock
   method using average market price                 445,558           -

Issuance of "cheap stock"                           -                     4,357

                                              ---------------  -----------------
                                                   4,825,582          2,564,774
                                              ===============  =================


Net income (loss)                              $     147,758    $       (96,539)
                                              ===============  =================


Net income (loss) per share                             0.03              (0.04)
                                              ===============  =================



                                       13