alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 161 (Monday, August 20, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-55516]



[[Page 43478]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 602


OMB Control Numbers Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

CFR Correction

    In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 600 to end, 
revised as of April 1, 2001, on page 155, Sec. 602.101 is amended by 
removing the entry for ``31.6051-1T'' following the entry for 
``1.6050S-2T''.

[FR Doc. 01-55516 Filed 8-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### Moore, Marsh & Company *v.*Medlock.

Submitted March 2,

Decided April 26, 1901.

Motion for rehearing denied May 8, 1901.

Practice in the Supreme Court.

*N. I. Hutchins*and *G. H Brand,*for plaintiffs in error.

*T. M. Peeples*and *J. A. Hunt,*contra.-

Simmons, C. J.

1. This court will not review the evidence in a case in which it is apparent from the record that there has been no bona fide effort made to brief the evidence as required by law, and when the document purporting to be a brief of the evidence is no brief at all, but a needlessly voluminous paper, abounding in repetition and much totally useless and irrelevant matter. *Price*v. *High,*108 *Ga.*145 ; *Ansley*v. *Davidson,*110 *Ga.*279; *Buchanan*v. *McClain,*110 *Ga.*479; *McLeod*v. *Railroad Co.,*111 *Ga.*859.

2. Where in such a case no question is presented which can be determined without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.*
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 13a0895n.06

No. 13-1261

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

NICOLE BARBER;

ALVIN GLASPER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN

DIVISION

OPINION

Before: ROGERS, GRIFFIN, and DONALD, Circuit Judges. 

BERNICE B. DONALD, Circuit Judge. Nicole Barber and Alvin Glasper appeal the

district court’s grant of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss their

ten-count complaint. The district court's dismissal order and judgment were entered on January 30,

2013, (Page ID # 638, 655), and Appellants filed a notice of appeal on March 2, 2013, (Page ID #

656). Although Appellants contend that the notice of appeal was timely, (Appellant Br. at 7), Federal

Rule of Appellate Procedure ("FRAP") 4(a)(1)(A) prescribes an appeal period of thirty days from

the entry of judgment, which expired on March 1, 2013. Appellants also filed no motions under

FRAP 4(a)(5) or (6) to extend or re-open the time to file an appeal. Accordingly, Appellants' notice

of appeal was untimely. 
No. 13-1261

Barber v. Bank of America

FRAP 4 effectuates the statutory mandate that "no appeal shall bring any judgment, order

or decree in an action, suit or proceeding of a civil nature before a court of appeals for review unless

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the entry of such judgment, order or decree." 28

U.S.C. § 2107(a). Consequently, both "the Supreme Court and this Court consistently have termed

[its deadlines] mandatory and jurisdictional." Ultimate Appliance CC v. Kirby Co., 601 F.3d 414,

415 (6th Cir. 2010) (collecting cases). "[T]he Rule 4 clock starts when a judgment is entered, not

when service of the judgment is effected[,]" id. at 416, and this court, like the U.S. Supreme Court,

"has no authority to create equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements," Bowles v. Russell,

551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Only Congress "may authorize courts to promulgate rules that excuse

compliance with the statutory time limits," id., and no such authorization or rules alleviate the

mandate that FRAP 4(a)(1)(A) advances.

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED as this court is without jurisdiction to consider it. 

- 2 -
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


American Home Mortgage Securities, LLC
538 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance for American Home Mortgage Investment
    Trust 2007-1, Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2007-1


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):


(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and Securities
Administrator during the Reporting Period under the Master Servicing Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as otherwise
provided on Schedule A hereto, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008

/s/ Joshua Kelly
JOSHUA KELLY
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Exceptions for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1, Mortgage
Backed Notes, Series 2007-1

Payment/Distribution Calculation Errors:

This deal experienced non-systemic administrative issues during the reporting
year that resulted in incorrect calculations of distributions to certificate
holders for one or more payment cycles. The instances were subsequently
corrected and remittance reports and payments to holders were revised to
reflect the correct distributions.
2009-0105.

#### State v. Keith.

Crawford App. No. 3-08-15, 2008-Ohio-6187.
EXHIBIT 23


RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
_____________________

PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580                       FAX (713) 651-0849
1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800                              TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218





                      CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




         As  independent  oil and gas  consultants,  Ryder Scott  Company,  L.P.
hereby  consents to all  references  to our firm's name and the inclusion of our
report  dated  March  2,  2010  of the  Estimated  Future  Reserves  and  Income
Attributable to Certain Leasehold  Interests as of February 28, 2009 of Mainland
Resources Inc. (the "Reserve Report") as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form
10-K for fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 initially filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about May 29, 2009.



                                             /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
                                             ________________________________
                                                 Ryder Scott Company, L.P.
                                                 TBPE Firm License No. F-1580


Houston, Texas
March 15, 2010




1200, 530 8TH  AVENUE, S.W.                                   TEL (403) 262-2799
CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 3S8                                      FAX (403) 262-2790

621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550                                   TEL (303) 623-9147
DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501                                   FAX (303) 623-4258
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2783

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study of the Brooklyn

waterfront, New York City, New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study

of the Brooklyn waterfront, New York City, New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STUDY OF BROOKLYN WATERFRONT, NEW

4 YORK.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation,

6 in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, shall con7 duct a study of current land uses, land availability, and

8 waterborne and land-side transportation in the area from

9 Pier 7 through the 65th Street railyards, from the

10 pierhead line up to the Gowanus Expressway, and along
2

•HR 2783 IH

1 the Staten Island coast in the vicinity of the Stapleton

2 Home Port, New York City, New York, in order to ascer3 tain the feasibility of establishing a major container feeder

4 port in such area, the cost of constructing such a port,

5 and the commercial viability of such a port.

6 (b) ASSUMPTIONS.—The Secretary of Transportation

7 shall conduct the study under this section utilizing each

8 of the following assumptions:

9 (1) That a rail freight tunnel which has been

10 proposed by the City of New York will be con11 structed between Staten Island, New York, or

12 Greenville, New Jersey, and Brooklyn, New York.

13 (2) That such a tunnel will not be constructed.

14 SEC. 2. REPORT.

15 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment

16 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall transmit

17 to Congress a report on the results of the study conducted

18 under this Act.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas,
Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that: 1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) the information contained in the Companys Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: April 23, 2004/s/ Paul B. Murphy, Jr.Paul B. Murphy, Jr.Director and Chief Executive Officer
2010-0734.

#### State ex rel. Donohoe v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-201, 2010-Ohio-1317.
Introduction to the Label 

Submission Approval System: 

LSAS

April 2012
LSAS: Submitter Benefits

There are many benefits to establishments that 

choose to use LSAS: – Wizard available to assist submitters with determining which labels 

can be submitted through the Generic Label submission process will 

reduce submission errors and questions to LPDD staff around generic 

approval

– Application processing will be faster vs. paper submission

– Realize cost and time savings vs. shipping via surface mail

– Quick and ready online access to application status

2
LSAS: Submitter Benefits (Continued)

– Storage and record keeping in an electronic environment allowing 

establishments to save & re-submit standard documentation (e.g., 

documents that support claims; written protocols) vs. having to print 

and re-submit with each label application

– Edit checks in the system will check for formatting and submission 

errors, allowing for corrections in “real time” vs. correcting upon 

return from LPDD, reducing turnaround time for label review

– Enhanced communication mechanisms (e.g., messaging within LSAS), 

reducing initial time spent on first time application submission and resubmissions

– Use of system requires level 2 e-Authentication

3
SAMPLE SCREEN SHOTS

SUBMITTERS DASHBOARD
Establishment Profile
Create Label Application
Product Information
Special Claims
Label Documentation
Formula Information
Processing Procedures
Confirmation of Submission
Download 7234-1, etc.

Submitter Selects Generic Label Advisor
Submitter Using Generic Label Advisor
Continued...
Example of Certificate for Generically Approved 

Labels
Coming Soon...Winter 2011

• LPDD Website being updated to include 

information about LSAS

– LSAS user manual

– Webinars for training

– Questions and Answers about the system 

19

LSAS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof GT Solar International, Inc. (the "Company") for the year
ended April 2, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:



Date:
May 25, 2011

/s/ THOMAS GUTIERREZ Thomas Gutierrez President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Date: May 25, 2011/s/ RICHARD J. GAYNOR Richard J. Gaynor Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the Future Flight Data Collection Committee meeting to be held March 29, 2001, starting at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Meeting Agenda; (3) Review Previous Meeting Minutes; (4) Receive report on the deliberations of Working Group 1 (Data Needs); (5) Receive report on the deliberations of Working Group 2 (Technology); (6) Receive report on the deliberations of Working Group 3 (Data Use and Protection); (7) Discuss timeline for deliverables from the Working Groups; (8) Review progress on the Final Report; (9) Receive Presentations; (10) Other Business; (11) Establish Agenda for Next Meeting; (12) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (13) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements, obtain information or pre-register for the committee should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 23, 2001.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 01-5137  Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2958 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2958

To require the Federal Communications Commission to make the provision 
      of Wi-Fi access on school buses eligible for E-rate support.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2018

Mr. Udall (for himself and Mr. Gardner) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to make the provision 
      of Wi-Fi access on school buses eligible for E-rate support.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. E-RATE SUPPORT FOR SCHOOL BUS WI-FI.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``school bus'' means a 
passenger motor vehicle that is--
            (1) designed to carry a driver and not less than 5 
        passengers; and
            (2) used significantly to transport early child education, 
        elementary school, or secondary school students to or from 
        school or an event related to school.
    (b) Rulemaking.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
conduct a rulemaking to make the provision of Wi-Fi access on school 
buses eligible for support under the E-rate program of the Commission 
set forth under subpart F of part 54 of title 47, Code of Federal 
Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
2009-1939.

#### State ex rel. Runyon v. Sage.

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73

### CFR Correction

In Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 70 to 79, revised as of October 1, 2000, § 73.3555 is corrected by revising paragraphs (e)(2)(i) and (e)(2)(ii) and the first sentence of Note 5 to read as follows:

§ 73.3555

* * * * *

(e) * * *

(2) * * *

                        (i)                         *National audience reach*                         means the total number of television households in the Nielsen Designated Market Area (DMA) markets in which the relevant stations are located divided by the total national television households as measured by DMA data at the time of a grant, transfer, or assignment of a license. For purposes of making this calculation, UHF television stations shall be attributed with 50 percent of the television households in their DMA market.                    

(ii) No market shall be counted more than once in making this calculation.

* * * * *

**Note 5:**                             Paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section will not be applied to cases involving television stations that are “satellite” operations. * * *                         

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 01-55514 Filed 4-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit99.2**

** **

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euramax International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2002 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I ,R. Scott Vansant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:                    August 6, 2002                                                                                                                /s/           R.Scott Vansant                  

 

R. Scott Vansant

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5426]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Meeting; Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 9, 2001, 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

STATUS:   

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of February 16, 2001 Meeting.
III. Announcements.
IV. Staff Director's Report.
V. Project Planning.
VI. Status Report on Voting Rights Issues.
VII. State Advisory Committee Report:
<bullet> Reconciliation at a Crossroads: The Implications of Rice V. 
Cayetano on Programs for Native hawaiians (Hawaii);
<bullet> The Decision to Prosecute Drug Offense and Homicides in Marion 
County, Indiana (Indiana).
VIII. Future Agenda Items.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Aronson, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8312.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-5426 Filed 3-1-01; 2:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
ELIZXBE H LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE,/ 

Order issued September 2C , 2012 

In The 

Truth of Apptats 

ITiftIjBistrirt uf IJixas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00453-CV 

PRISCILLA BOUIE, Appellant 

V. 

KIRKLAND'S STORES, INC., Appellee 

ORDER 

Before the Court is appellee's August 28, 2012 motion to dismiss appeal for want of 

prosecution and appellant's September 6, 2012 response. We DENY appellee's motion. 

Our records reflect appellant has paid the appellate filing fee. Our records further reflect the 

reporter's record has been filed, but the clerk's record has not due to non-payment. Accordingly, 

we ORDER appellant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, for the clerk's record within twenty (20) 

days of the date of this order. We caution appellant that failure to pay for the clerk's record will 

result in dismissal of this appeal without further warning. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3 (b),(c).