alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Samir KARAM, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73754.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Natalia A. Nekrasova, Roni P. Deutsch, Esq., Encino, CA, for Petitioner.

*663CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Christopher C. Fuller, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office Of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. *663R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Samir Karam, a native and citizen of Syria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Karam’s motion to reopen, on the ground that Karam did not show he was prejudiced by his prior counsel’s failure to file an application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). *See Lin v. Ashcroft,*377 F.3d 1014, 1027 (9th Cir. 2004) (to demonstrate prejudice a petitioner must show plausible grounds for relief); *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) (asylum application must be filed within one year of alien’s arrival in the United States); *see Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (evidence of one incident of physical violence not connected to any specific threat combined with other unfulfilled threats constitutes “harassment rather than persecution”), *see*8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2) (CAT applicant must establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured if removed).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document

Exhibit 10.4

Amendment to Employment Agreement
This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of May 18, 2020 by and between Scientific Games Corporation, a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) and Michael Winterscheidt (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 2017, which was then amended as of February 25, 2019, and was then further amended as of March 27, 2020 (with amendments, the “Agreement”);
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
1.Eligibility for Cash Awards.  The Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 3(g) to the Agreement:
“If Executive is an employee of the Company on November 30, 2020, then he shall receive, within ten (10) business days after that date, an amount equal to one hundred twenty-five thousand U.S. dollars ($125,000), less applicable withholdings.  If Executive is an employee of the Company on February 28, 2021, then he shall receive, within ten (10) business days after that date, an additional amount equal to fifty thousand U.S. dollars ($50,000), less applicable withholdings.  These amounts shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, other compensation for which Executive is eligible pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement.”
2. Except as set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.  All references to the “Agreement” in the Agreement shall refer to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Any defined terms used in this Amendment and not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Agreement.
        3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by electronic transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed this Amendment as of May 18, 2020.
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION


By:   /s/ James Sottile___________________
Name: James Sottile 
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
        
/s/ Michael Winterscheidt___________________
Michael Winterscheidt
1
EXHIBIT 21.1

Spectra Energy Partners, LP Subsidiary List

The following is a list
of certain subsidiaries (greater than 50% owned) of the registrant and their respective states of incorporation.



|                                     |  |                              |           | 
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------- | --------- | 
|Name                                 |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |          
|East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC      |  |                              | Tennessee | 
|Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.       |  |                              | Oklahoma  | 
|Ozark Gas Gathering, L.L.C.          |  |                              | Oklahoma  | 
|Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C. |  |                              | Virginia  |
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------



                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

     I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
               10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
               this report on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
               2007-S2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
               as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
               fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
               statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
               statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
               covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
               other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
               period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports;

          4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
               servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
               review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
               statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
               Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
               obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
               respects; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
               attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
               this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
               Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
               exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
               report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
               reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
          Bank of New York, as Trustee.

     Date: March 27, 2008

          /s/ Steve Bailey
          -------------------------
          Steve Bailey
          Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
          (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
          Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-11670

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20879-FAM-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALVARO ENRIQUE MURILLO MARTINEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(August 5, 2015)

Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alvaro Enrique Murillo Martinez appeals pro se the denial of his motion to

Case: 15-11670 Date Filed: 08/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

reduce his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Martinez’s 

motion. In 2014, the district court reduced Martinez’s sentence from 119 months of 

imprisonment to 72 months of imprisonment based on Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 35, but amendment 782 did not alter Martinez’s sentencing range. The 

district court denied Martinez’s motion because he “agreed [in the factual proffer 

to his plea agreement] that the weight of the cocaine involved was 900 kilograms 

of cocaine,” which made him ineligible for a further reduction of his sentence. See

U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1) (assigning a base offense level of 38 for cases involving 

450 kilograms or more of cocaine). Martinez challenges the amount of cocaine 

attributed to him, but the district court could not disturb its earlier finding about 

drug quantity when considering Martinez’s motion to reduce. See United States v. 

Bravo, 203 F.3d 778, 780 (11th Cir. 2000). Because Martinez was ineligible for a 

reduction of his sentence, the district court lacked the authority to consider the 

statutory sentencing factors or to exercise its discretion to impose a new sentence.

Id. at 781.

We AFFIRM the denial of Martinez’s motion to reduce his sentence.

Case: 15-11670 Date Filed: 08/05/2015 Page: 2 of 2
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of STARLIMS Technologies Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Itschak Friedman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Itschak Friedman *
Itschak Friedman
Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2008

*     The originally executed copy of
this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made
available for inspection upon request.



---

---
#### Doward ALLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kathy MENDOZA-POWERS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-15404.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 19, 2011.

Doward Ally, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Krista Leigh Pollard, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Doward Ally appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 22531, and we affirm.

Ally contends that the Board of Prison Terms’s 2004 decision to deny him parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. The state court did not unreasonably conclude that some evidence supports the Board’s decision. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *see also Hayward v. Marshall,*603 F.3d 546, 562-63 (9th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the 2004 decision of the California Board of Prison Terms to deny parole violated due process. We decline to issue a certificate of appealability as to Ally's remaining claims.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*December 29, 2009*

[Cite as *12/29/2009 Case Announcements #2,*2009-Ohio-6904.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2009-2068.

#### State ex rel. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered, sua sponte, that the October 15, 2009 order of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in case No. M0201052, *In re Appointment of Special Legal Counsel,*is hereby stayed pending further order of this court.

O’Connor, J., dissents and would deny the stay until such time as a party to the case requests a stay pending this court’s resolution of the writ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar PORTILLO-CERVANTES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41333

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*370Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Portillo-Cervantes raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5039]



[[Page 13127]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

February 23, 2001.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

dates: Written comments should be received on or before April 2, 2001.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF)

    OMB Number: 1512-0518.
    Form Number: ATF F 7CR (5310.16).
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application for License, Collector of Curios and Relics.
    Description: This form is used by the public when applying for a 
Federal firearms license to collect curios and relics in interstate and 
foreign commerce. The information requested on the form establishes 
eligibility for the license.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 6,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,500 hours.

    OMB Number: 1512-0559.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Identification of Explosive Materials.
    Description: This information is necessary to ensure that 
explosives can be effectively traced. The regulations at 27 CFR 55.109 
implement title XI of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. The 
respondents are persons and companies engaged in the business of 
manufacturing explosives.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 1,563.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper: None.
    Frequency of Response: Other (the day following manufacturer of 
explosive materials).
    Estimated Total Recordkeeping Burden: 1 hour.

Clearance Officer: Frank Bowers (202) 927-8930, Bureau of Alcohol, 
Tobacco and Firearms, Room 3200, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20226.
OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-5039 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements, on Form S-8 ( File No.333-4489, 333-93788, 333-14749 and 333-61797)
and on Form S-3  (File No. 333-45929) of Sola International, Inc. of our report
dated May 5, 2000 except for Note 18, which is as of June 5, 2000 relating to
the consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated May
5, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form
10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California

June 14, 2000
#### Patrick N. SWEENEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.

No. 2007-3091.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 3, 2007.

Patrick N. Sweeney, pro se.

*ORDER*

Patrick N. Sweeney has complied with the court’s order of March 15, 2007.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, vacated and recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(2) Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.
EX-33.7
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January
1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 ("the Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code
of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party ("the Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans
for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting
Party served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party
has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/ Scott R. Friberg
Scott R. Friberg
Chief Operations Officer
February 22, 2008
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
     Form 10-K of ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
     2007-WM2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
     have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Ocwen
    Loan Servicing, LLC as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)