alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.16
Wachovia Bank, National Association
8739 Research Drive, URP4
Charlotte, NC 28288-1075

(logo) WACHOVIA SECURITIES



1123 SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as
of March 1, 2007, by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
as Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland
Loan Services, Inc., as Master Servicer, Capmark Finance Inc., as Master
Servicer, LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, CD 2007-CD4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms
used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 3.13of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan, and Marilyn Addison,
Managing Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of
Compliance Third Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   March 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, and of its performance under the
   Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision; and

2. To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the period March 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007; and

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
10th day of March 2008.


/s/ Timothy S. Ryan
Timothy S. Ryan, Managing Director
Wachovia Bank National Association

/s/ Marilyn Addison
Marilyn Addison, Director
Wachovia Bank National Association
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 3, 2010 | /s/ David Bychkov                |   |
|-------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|              | David Bychkov                    |   |
|              | President, Chief Financial       |   |
|              | Officer, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|              | (Principal financial officer)    |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 4, 2000, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (“PERF”) Project No. 99-05 has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are BP Amoco Chemical Company, Alvin, TX; Berwanger, Inc., Houston, TX; Anderson Greenwood Crosby, Stafford, TX; Dresser Equipment Group, Inc., Alexandria, LA; ExxonMobil Research and Engineering, Fairfax, VA; Shell Oil Company, Houston, TX; and Texaco Inc., Bellaire, TX.                

The nature and objectives of the venture are to conduct a joint research project to evaluate the stability of pressure relief devices.

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of  Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-5484 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-55509]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2001 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 15785]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

7 CFR Part 1786


Prepayment of RUS Guaranteed and Insured Loans to Electric and 
Telephone Borrowers

CFR Correction

    In Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1600 to 1899, 
revised as of Jan. 1, 2001, Sec. 1786.31 is corrected by removing the 
second paragraph (c) on page 1018.

[FR Doc. 01-55509 Filed 3-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### Anthony Lionel GIBSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of TEXAS; Dallas County Texas, Bill Long, Clerk; John Vance, District Attorney; Mark Nancarrow, Judge; Fred McDaniel, Magistrate Judge; Josie Massar, Court Reporter; Bailiff Court #204; Kati Drew; C. Leroy Johnson; Bruce Anton, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-11459

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

Anthony Lionel Gibson, Dallas, TX, pro se.

Julia Hamill Murray, Office of the Attorney General, Law Enforcement Defense Div., Austin, TX, District Attorney’s Office for the County of Dallas, Dolena Tutt Westergard, District Attorney’s Office for the County of Dallas, Charles L. Perry, Andrews & Kurth, Bruce Edward Anton, Sorrels, Udashen & Anton, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anthony Lionel Gibson, former Texas prisoner # 695684, appeals from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit, in which he sued numerous defendants connected with his state court conviction and subsequent state habeas proceedings. The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim because the claims were barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

Gibson argues that the district court erroneously applied the Heck-bar. The thrust of Gibson’s claims is that the defendants conspired and falsified documents in his state habeas proceedings because they knew his incarceration was illegal, thereby depriving him of his liberty. Gibson’s claims challenged the validity of his incarceration, and the district court did not err. *See Heck,*512 U.S. at 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364.

Gibson has also filed a motion to compel the court reporter to produce a transcript *353of a hearing on his motion for discovery. That motion is denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5661]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-035]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Aero-Space Technology Advisory 
Committee (ASTAC); Airframe Systems Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Aero-
Space Technology Advisory Committee, Airframe Systems Subcommittee.

DATES: Thursday, April 5, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5:45 p.m. and Friday, April 
6, 2001, 8 a.m. to 12 Noon.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley 
Research Center, Building 1244, Room 223, Hampton, VA 23681-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Darrel Tenney, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Hampton, 
VA 23681, 757/864-6033.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--October 24 to 26, 2000, Subcommittee Report
--January 12 to 13, 2001, Report from the Turbulence Workshop
--Wind Tunnel Status and Strategy
--Aerospace Vehicle Systems Technology Program (AVSTP) Status
--AVSTP Vision and New Initiatives

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: March 5, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-5661 Filed 3-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
**EXHIBIT 5**

 

**[LETTERHEAD OF MATTHEW LEPORE]**

 

October 15, 2009

Pfizer Inc.  235 East 42nd Street   New York, New York 10017-5755 

Pfizer Inc.:

In connection with the  Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to 88,994 shares of Common Stock of  Pfizer Inc. under the Wyeth Union Savings Plan the ("Plan"), it is my opinion that:

All necessary corporate  proceedings have been taken to authorize the issuance of the shares under the  Plan, and all such shares, upon issuance in accordance with the Plan and upon  full payment in cash for such shares issued, will be validly issued and  outstanding and fully paid and non-assessable.

In preparing this opinion, I have  examined certificates of public officials, certificates of officers and copies  certified to my satisfaction of such corporate documents and records of the  Company and such other papers as I have thought relevant and necessary as a  basis for my opinion. I have relied on such certificates in connection with the  accuracy of actual matters contained in such documents that were not  independently established.

I consent to the use of this  opinion in the Registration Statement. In giving such consent, I do not admit  that I come within the category of persons whose consent is required under  Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Rules and Regulations of the  Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Matthew Lepore

MATTHEW LEPORE
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2892 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report 

to Congress on the provision of peer support services under the Medicaid 

program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2018 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States 

to submit a report to Congress on the provision of peer 

support services under the Medicaid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peer Support En5 hancement and Evaluation Review Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GAO REPORT ON PEER SUPPORT SERVICES UNDER 

7 MEDICAID. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2892 IS

1 of the United States shall submit to the Committee on 

2 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, 

3 the Committee on Finance of the Senate, and the Com4 mittee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the 

5 Senate a report on the provision of peer support services 

6 under the Medicaid program. 

7 (b) CONTENT OF REPORT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—The report required under 

9 subsection (a) shall include the following informa10 tion: 

11 (A) Information on State coverage of peer 

12 support services under Medicaid, including— 

13 (i) the mechanisms through which 

14 States may provide such coverage, includ15 ing through existing statutory authority or 

16 through waivers; 

17 (ii) the populations to which States 

18 have provided such coverage; 

19 (iii) the payment models, including 

20 any alternative payment models, used by 

21 States to pay providers of such services; 

22 and 

23 (iv) where available, information on 

24 Federal and State spending under Med25 icaid for peer support services. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2892 IS

1 (B) Information on selected State experi2 ences in providing medical assistance for peer 

3 support services under State Medicaid plans 

4 and whether States measure the effects of pro5 viding such assistance with respect to— 

6 (i) improving access to behavioral 

7 health services; 

8 (ii) improving early detection, and 

9 preventing worsening, of behavioral health 

10 disorders; 

11 (iii) reducing chronic and comorbid 

12 conditions; and 

13 (iv) reducing overall health costs. 

14 (2) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The report required 

15 under subsection (a) shall include recommendations, 

16 including recommendations for such legislative and 

17 administrative actions related to improving services, 

18 including peer support services, and access to peer 

19 support services under Medicaid as the Comptroller 

20 General of the United States determines appro21 priate. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
One Health: NARMS and FSIS 

Posted by Dr. Uday Dessai, Senior Public Health Advisor, FSIS; Dr. Sheryl Shaw, Director, Applied Epidemiology Staff, FSIS; Dr. Gamola Fortenberry, 

Epidemiologist, FSIS; Spencer Pretecrum, Speechwriter; FSIS. 

Under the holistic One Health approach,relationships between the health of humans, animals, 

plants, and the environment are studied in an integrated manner. In the United States the recently 

published Strategic Plan (2020-2025) for CombatingAntibiotic Resistant Bacteria (CARB), the 

USDA Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Action Plan, and the newly published NARMS strategic 

plan (2021-2025), all emphasize the role of the One Health approach to address AMR. 

Internationally, many organizations also focus on promoting and utilizing the One Health 

approach to control the spread of diseases between animals and humans (zoonosis) and to 

combat AMR. 

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been an area of focus during the past two decades as USDA 

plays a dual role in protecting animal agriculture and public health. USDA recognizes AMR as a 

potential and serious threat and focuses on surveillance, research and development, and 

education, extension, and outreach. The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is a USDA 

agency which gathers AMR information from food animals at slaughter under the National 

Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring (NARMS) program. Under NARMS, FSIS and U.S. Food 

and Drug Administration (FDA) collaborate to gather AMR information on foodborne zoonotic 

pathogens and indicator bacteria.The recent efforts to expand NARMS from a public health to 

One Health focus can be seen in the new NARMS Strategic Plan (2021-2025). In support of this 

change in NARMS, as well as the USDA AMR and the CARB plans, FSIS has expanded its 

NARMS program by including additional animal species, commodities, and target 

microorganisms. These include cecal AMR testing for the NARMS bacteria in minor species 

(sheep, goat, lamb) and veal; testing for indicator bacteria in siluriformes fish (catfish), testing 

for Salmonella in cattle lymph nodes; and screening for specific type of AMR as well as 

microbial diversity directly from cecal (animal intestinal)samples. The expansion in FSIS 

NARMS will help FSIS and the ‘NARMS/One Health’ partners to connect human health, animal 

health and the environment more effectively with respect to food safety and zoonosis and help 

curb AMR along the farm-to-fork continuum. For more information on NARMS visit the FSIS 

NARMS Webpage. 

While FSIS and the other federal partners actively engage in the AMR work, consumers should 

remain vigilant about pathogens in their foods. To protect individuals and families from 

foodborne pathogens, FSIS recommends the four safe food preparation steps: Clean, Separate, 

Cook and Chill.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,487,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,994,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,868,000
<PP&E>                                          18,083,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,991,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,398,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,837,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            22,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,851,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,398,000
<SALES>                                          2,899,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,899,000
<CGS>                                           21,600,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      729,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 121,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (131,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (131,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (131,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.11)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7701

VICKY HARDY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ERNEST R. SUTTON, Superintendent at Pasquotank

Correctional Center; MS. VANKEUREN, Medical

Services at Pasquotank Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:05-ct-00491-FL)

Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: June 11, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vicky Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Vicky Hardy appeals the district court’s order dismissing

Hardy’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. While the district court may have erred

in dismissing the complaint for failure to exhaust under the

Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones v. Bock, ___U.S.___, 2007

WL 135890 (U.S. Jan. 22, 2007) (No. 05-7058), we affirm the

district court’s order on the modified ground that Hardy cannot

proceed on claims based upon respondeat superior and supervisory

liability. See Shaw v. Stroud, 13 F.3d 791, 799 (4th Cir. 1994);

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 850 (4th Cir. 1985). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*May 27, 2010*

[Cite as *05/27/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-2330.]

*1443MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2006-1502.

#### State v. Fry.

Summit C.P. No. 2005-08-3007. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution scheduled for June 22, 2010. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for stay of execution is granted.

It is further ordered that this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals.

It is further ordered that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.