alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex. 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tilden Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I,
Robert Baskind, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ ROBERT BASKIND
--------------------------------
Robert Baskind
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 19, 2002


                                       11
National Disability Employment 

Awareness Month 

2021
OPPORTUNITY

EMPOWERMENT

EXCLUSION BIAS

MYTHS INEQUALITY

STEREOTYPES

STIGMAS

Breaking Barriers : 

Removing Stigmas and Stereotypes
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed April 21, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1199

Lower Tribunal No. 19-3012

________________

Cliff O. Hanson,

Appellant,

vs.

The Lofts Town Villas Condominium Association, Inc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. 

Rodriguez, Judge.

Cliff O. Hanson, in proper person.

Paul A. McKenna & Associates, P.A., and Andrew H. Braaksma, for 

appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Cliff O. Hanson appeals the entry of a final summary judgment of 

foreclosure, alleging, in pertinent part, a lack of notice of the summary 

judgment hearing.1 The appeal appears to have substantive infirmities, 

such as the failure to put any evidence before the trial judge to counter the 

rebuttable presumption that appellant received notice of the complained-of 

hearing. World on Wheels, Inc. v. Int’l Auto Motors, Inc., 569 So.2d 836, 

837 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). However, we do not reach the merits of the 

appeal as we lack jurisdiction to hear untimely appeals. 

The order on appeal was rendered on Monday, July 20, 2020, giving 

appellant 30 days from that date to file a notice of appeal. See Fla. R. App. 

P. 9.110(b) ("(b) Commencement. Jurisdiction of the court under this rule 

shall be invoked by filing a notice, accompanied by any filing fees 

prescribed by law, with the clerk of the lower tribunal within 30 days of 

rendition of the order to be reviewed . . . ."). Thirty days from July 20 is 

Wednesday, August 19, 2020. As a result, the Notice of Appeal appears to 

have been filed one day late on August 20, 2020. This is a jurisdictional 

defect that prevents consideration of the appeal. See Philip J. Padovano, 2 

1 We note that the order granting summary judgment is not a final order. 

However, even if we were to overlook this or consider the notice of appeal 

curable due to the referenced (but not attached) “summary final judgment 

of foreclosure,” we cannot waive the jurisdictional defect of late filing of a 

notice of appeal. 
3

Fla. Prac., Appellate Practice § 23:8 (2021 ed.) ("Because the notice of 

appeal is the document that invokes appellate jurisdiction, it is essential 

that the notice be filed within the jurisdictional time limit. When an untimely 

notice of appeal has been filed in a civil case, the appeal will be dismissed 

for lack of jurisdiction.").

Dismissed.
#### Martin Francisco AGUILAR SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73752.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

*603Martin Francisco Aguilar Salazar, Huntington Beach, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jennifer L. Lightbody, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

On December 14, 2006, this court ordered petitioner to file with this court a copy of his legalization application. To date, petitioner has not responded to the order to show cause.

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 5, 2010*

[Cite as *0110512010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-6.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2009-0950.

#### Meccon, Inc. v. Univ. of Akron.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-727, 182 Ohio App.3d 85, 2009-Ohio-1700. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for admission pro hac vice of Emily Sehlesinger by Benjamin C. Mizer,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for admission pro hac vice is granted.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of MIPSolutions, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Lamberson, President, Principal Accounting Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:       /s/ Jeffrey Lamberson

President, Principal Accounting Officer

and Director



April 15, 2010



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FDIC 5210/10 (5-21) Page of 

OMB Number: 3064-0122 

Expiration Date: 01/31/2023

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

OUTSIDE COUNSEL LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (LSA) 

RATE SCHEDULE 

 

 

 

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT 

 

 

Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 1.0 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing 

and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Paperwork Reduction Act Clearance 

Officer, Legal Division, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20429; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (3064-0122), Washington, DC 20503. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 

 

 

 

Page down to access form 5210/10 
FDIC 5210/10 (5-21) Page of 

OMB Number: 3064-0122 

Expiration Date: 01/31/2023

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

OUTSIDE COUNSEL LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (LSA) 

RATE SCHEDULE 

INSTRUCTIONS: All Amendments to this Rate Schedule, i.e., firm's name, Tax Identification Number, address, contact attorney, telephone/fax numbers, billable individuals, or additions/

deletions, must contain the information shown on the Legal Services Agreement (Amendment form). 

Download the Amendment form from the FDIC website at www.fdic.gov/formsdocuments/f5210-06.pdf.

Legal Services Agreement Effective Date

SECTION I - OUTSIDE COUNSEL INFORMATION

1. Name of Law Firm 2. Branch/Office Location 3. Federal Tax Identification Number

4. Address (Street, City, State, ZIP Code) 5. Email 

6. Name of Contact Attorney 7. Telephone 8. Fax Number

SECTION II - BILLING

9. Complete the following

Billable Individual 

(First, Middle, Last) 

Alphabetical Order

Timekeeper 

ID

State 

Licenses

Position 

P (Partner) 

A (Associate) 

PP (Paraprofessional) 

O (Other) - Specify

Years in 

Practice Minority Status Gender Standard Rate

Percent 

(%) 

Discount

Proposed 

FDIC Rate
FDIC 5210/10 (5-21) Page of 

OMB Number: 3064-0122 

Expiration Date: 01/31/2023

Billable Individual 

(First, Middle, Last) 

Alphabetical Order

Timekeeper 

ID

State 

Licenses

Position 

P (Partner) 

A (Associate) 

PP (Paraprofessional) 

O (Other) - Specify

Years in 

Practice Minority Status Gender Standard Rate

Percent 

(%) 

Discount

Proposed 

FDIC Rate

SECTION III - LAW FIRM'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

10. Name 11. Title 12. Signature 13. Date

SECTION IV - FDIC DELEGATED APPROVING OFFICIAL

14. Name 15. Title 16. Legal Division or Office

17. Signature 18. Date
Exhibit 32.1.1

CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Schuster, principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (the
Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ James E. Schuster        
|James E. Schuster, President 
|(Principal Executive Officer)

February 25, 2009
<PAGE>


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Richard H. Terzian, Chief Financial Officer of California Federal Preferred
Capital Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, that:

    (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
         (15 U. S. C. 78m); and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  August 9, 2002



                                   /s/ Richard H. Terzian
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Richard H. Terzian
                                   Chief Financial Officer



                                       19
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6192

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ROGER LEE LOCKAMY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr

. , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr - 00096

- WO

- 1 )

Submitted : June 9, 2023 Decided: July 13, 2023

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Roger Lee Lockamy , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6192 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Roger Lee Lockamy appeals the district c ourt’s order denying his motions for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court ’s order

. United States v. Lock amy , No. 1:14

- cr - 00096

- WO

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6192 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/13/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Nacel Energy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lavery, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/Brian
M. Lavery


Chief
Executive Officer





June 26,
2009
Exhibit No. 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S‐3 of PDC Energy, Inc. (No. 333-202853) and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of PDC Energy, Inc. (No. 333-189685, No. 333-167945, No. 333-137836,  No. 333-118222 and No. 333-118215), of our report dated February 22, 2016 , relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10‐K.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Denver, Colorado


February 22, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2896 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2896

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
     To require disclosure by lobbyists of convictions for bribery, 
    extortion, embezzlement, illegal kickbacks, tax evasion, fraud, 
   conflicts of interest, making false statements, perjury, or money 
                               laundering.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice Against Corruption on K 
Street Act of 2018'' or the ``JACK Act''.
SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF CORRUPT MALPRACTICE BY LOBBYISTS.
    (a) Registration.--Section 4(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1603(b)) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and 
    inserting ``; and''; and
        (3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
        ``(7) for any listed lobbyist who was convicted in a Federal or 
    State court of an offense involving bribery, extortion, 
    embezzlement, an illegal kickback, tax evasion, fraud, a conflict 
    of interest, making a false statement, perjury, or money 
    laundering, the date of the conviction and a description of the 
    offense.''.
    (b) Quarterly Reports.--Section 5(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act 
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1604(b)) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and 
    inserting ``; and''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(6) for any listed lobbyist who was convicted in a Federal or 
    State court of an offense involving bribery, extortion, 
    embezzlement, an illegal kickback, tax evasion, fraud, a conflict 
    of interest, making a false statement, perjury, or money 
    laundering, the date of the conviction and a description of the 
    offense.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-20,058-21

EX PARTE CURTIS RAY GOODIE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 928493-D IN THE 248 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to fifteen years’

imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that he is being improperlyheld on this sentence, which he alleges should

have discharged. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. The trial court

found that the sentence has discharged, but those findings are not currently supported by the record.

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX.CODECRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with
2

knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in

Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant

is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall

appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel

is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The response shall state whether Applicant presented a claim to the time credit resolution

system of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and, if so, the date the claim was presented. The

response shall also detail how Applicant’s sentence in this cause is being calculated, including

reference to his sentence begin date, his maximum discharge date, and any applicable time credits

that have been earned or forfeited. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of

law as to whether, before filing this application, Applicant properly exhausted his administrative

remedies as required by Section 501.0081(b) of the Government Code. The trial court shall then

determine whether Applicant has discharged this sentence and, if he has not, whether his time is

being calculated correctly. The trial court maymake any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 
3

Filed: February 26, 2020 

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,193,772
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,304,685
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,912,009
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,064,832
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,088,443
<LOANS>                                     78,806,387
<ALLOWANCE>                                    517,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             110,523,307
<DEPOSITS>                                  79,640,395
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,155,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,097,048
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,547
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,616,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             110,523,307
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,442,919
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              370,295
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                28,051
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,841,265
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             743,056
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             807,147
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,034,118
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             133,890
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                757,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                446,044
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     446,044
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   281,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.01
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               511,437
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              517,437
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           455,063
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         63,374
        

</TABLE>