alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### U.S. Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Applications are invited for research projects under the NEHRP.

The purpose of this Program is to support the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program by providing products for earthquake loss reduction to the public and private sectors and by carrying out research on earthquake occurrence and effects.

Applications may be submitted by educational institutions, private firms, private foundations, individuals, and agencies of state and local governments.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The program announcement is expected to be available on or about March 1, 2001. You may obtain a copy of Announcement No. 02HQPA0001 from the USGS Contracts and Grants Information Site at                         *http://www.usgs.gov/​contracts/​nehrp/​*                         or by writing to Sherri Newman, U.S. Geological Survey, Office of Acquisition and Grants—Mail Stop 205G, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, or by fax (703) 648-7901.                    

# DATES:

The closing date for receipt of applications will be on or about May 1, 2001. The actual closing date will be specified in Announcement No. 02HQPA0001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John Unger, Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program—U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 905, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192. Telephone: (703) 648-6701.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Authority for this program is contained in the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977, Public Law 95-124 (42 U.S.C. 7701,                     *et seq.*). The Office of Management and Budget Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number is 15.807.                

Dated: February 15, 2001.

Patricia P. Dunham,

Deputy Chief, Office of Administrative Policy and Services.

[FR Doc. 01-5460 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
FDIC 5000/26 (5-21)

OMB Number: 3064-0122 

Expiration Date: 01/31/2023

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

NON-LITIGATION BUDGET

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT NOTICE 

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.5 hours per response, including the time for 

reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the 

collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including 

suggestions for reducing this burden to the Paper Reduction Act Clearance Officer, Legal Division, Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation, 550 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction 

Project (3064-0122), Washington, D.C. 20503. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 

Page down to access form 5000/26

Page 1 of 2
FDIC 5000/26 (5-21)

OMB Number: 3064-0122 

Expiration Date: 01/31/2023

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

NON-LITIGATION BUDGET

INSTRUCTIONS: Please provide all information requested.

SECTION I - INSTITUTION INFORMATION

1. Matter Number 2. Matter Caption

3. Institution Number 4. Institution Name 6. Institution Type

 Bank Thrift

5. Firm Name

SECTION II - NON-LITIGATION BUDGET INFORMATION

Attorney's Fees: Estimated Recovery Value:

Hourly Rate:

Contingent Fee:

TOA Fee:

Fixed Fee:

% of

$

Specify nature of Non-Litigation work to be performed. 

Estimated Completion Date:

Estimated Hours for Completion: Fees Expenses Total

SECTION III - LAW FIRM BUDGET ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I acknowledge that the budget information contained herein is correct to the best of my knowledge and written approval of the Legal 

Division is required for any increase in the total budget amount.

Authorized Law Firm Delegate

Name Title Telephone Fax

Signature Date

SECTION IV - BUDGET AUTHORIZATION FOR OUTSIDE COUNSEL TO PROCEED

FDIC Attorney (Recommending approval of budget)

Name Signature Date Budget Approved

Delegated Authority

Name Signature Date Budget Approved

Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


         Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Michael C. Culver, as Chief Executive Officer of First Aviation Services Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

(1)      the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
         period ended April 30, 2004 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S.
         Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  June 14, 2004


                                                     /s/ Michael C. Culver
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Michael C. Culver
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT
24.1
 SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
 Power of Attorney
 FORM 10-K
 
 Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC
 th
 SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS GP, LLCBy
    
    /s/ C. Gregory Harper

President and
Chief Executive Officer
   /s/ Norma A. TidrowAssistant Secretary




---



##### 



/s/ C. Gregory Harper
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerC. Gregory Harper
    
    (Principal Executive Officer and Director)/s/ Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.
    
    Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerLon C. Mitchell, Jr.
    
    (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ Steven D. Arnold
    
    (Director)Steven D. Arnold/s/ Stewart A. Bliss
    
    (Director)Stewart A. Bliss/s/ Nora M. Brownell
    
    (Director)Nora M. Brownell/s/ William S. Garner, Jr.
    
    (Director)William S. Garner, Jr./s/ Gregory J. Rizzo
    
    (Director)Gregory J. Rizzo/s/ Martha B. Wyrsch
    
    (Director)Martha B. Wyrsch
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CARDPOOL, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

PLASTIC JUNGLE, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

______________________

2013

- 1227

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 12

- CV

- 4182, Judge William H. Alsup.

______________________

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

______________________
Before R ADER , Chief Judge

, R EYNA and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges.

R ADER , Chief Judge

. O R D E R
Cardpool , Inc. petitions the court for panel rehearing

, and has advised the court that as a r esult of a reexamin ation of U.S. Patent No. 7,494,048 , the United StatesCARDPOOL , INC

. v. PLASTIC JUNGLE , INC

. 2

Patent and Trademark Office deemed patentable

, inter alia

, an amended Claim 1, the sole independent claim deemed ineligible below under 35 U.S.C. § 101

. On the court’s invitation, Plastic Jun gle, Inc. n/k/a Cardflo, Inc. (Plastic Jungle) responded to the petition. Cardpool moved for leave to file a reply, and replied after the court granted its motion. The parties both request that t his court vacate its decision , and the district court ’s dismissal

pu rsuant to F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 12(b)(6), as moot in light of the reexamined claims.

Because vacatur of the affirmance under F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 36 would not offend the public interest in this case, and because both parties agree with such action, the court
vacate s its prior decision and dismisses the appeal. U.S. Bancorp Mortg. Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship , 513 U.S. 18, 26 (1994). However, the court finds that it would not be appr opriate in this context to vacate the district court ’s jud gment because Cardpool, the losing party below, caused the change in circumstances. See Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona , 520 U.S. 43, 71

– 72 (1997) (citing Bancorp , 515 U.S. at 23)

. Thus, this court remands to the district court to determine what actions, if any, are a pp ropriate in light of the reexamined claims. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : 1) The petition for panel rehearing filed by Cardpool is granted -in- part

. 2) The court’s decision affirming the district court’s judgment is vacated and the appeal is dismissed. The matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.CARDPOOL , INC

. PLASTIC JUNGLE , INC

. 3

F OR THE C OURT

April 29, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date D aniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
#### Tiernan *v.*Kaiser *et al.*

Argued June 1,

Decided July 24, 1901.

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Lumpkin. Eulton superior court. October 6, 1900.

*A. IT. Davis,*for plaintiff in error. *Slaton & Phillips,*contra.

Cobb, J.

This was an equity case which was referred to an auditor. While on some of the points involved the evidence was conflicting, every finding of the auditor is supported hy evidence, and the discretion of the judge of the superior court in overruling all of the exceptions of fact will not be interfered with. Neither the exceptions of law to the auditor’s report which were overruled hy the judge, nor the assignments of error in the hill of exceptions upon the final decree, present any sufficient reason for reversing the judgment in the case. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
#### Stephane Cosman Connery et al., Respondents, v Burton S. Sultan, Appellant.

[2 NYS3d 894]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered December 3, 2012, in plaintiffs’ favor, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered November 28, 2012, which decided the parties’ motions addressed to the report of the Special Referee, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered February 6, 2013, which denied defendant’s motion to reargue (denominated a motion to renew and reargue), unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

As the action had not been discontinued, the court properly granted enforcement of the stipulation of settlement *(Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold,*48 NY2d 51 [1979]). Because the court’s power to do so was inherent, it was not necessary that the stipulation provide for the court to retain the power to enforce the settlement. The referee’s findings, which were based largely on a finding of credibility, were properly upheld *(see Matter of*
      *526
      *Jones v Blake,*120 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2014], *lv denied*23 NY3d 908 [2014]). Defendant’s claim that he was denied the opportunity to present evidence at the hearing is unsupported, and his challenge to the referee’s calculations was made, improperly, for the first time in the appellate reply brief.

We deny plaintiffs’ request for sanctions on appeal.

Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
Exhibit 31

                                                           [LOGO] IndymacBank(R)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Blair Abernathy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
      Form 10-K of IndyMac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-AR9 (the "Exchange Act
      periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
      whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
      information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
      by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
      this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
      the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance-with servicing criteria for
      asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
      assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
      1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
      included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
      this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
      reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company and Newport Management Corporation.

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Blair Abernathy
-----------------------
Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)
#### CIES BISKER, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Floorgraphics, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and News America Marketing In-Store, LLC and News America Marketing In-Store Services, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2010-1386.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2011.

Todd I. Blumenfeld, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jonathan T. Suder.

David B. Weaver, Vinson & Elkins LLP, of Austin, TX, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the briefs were Stephen M. Hash, Jennifer Librach Nall; and Hilary L. Preston, of New York, N.Y. *332for News America Marketing In-Store, LLC, et al.

David D. Bahler, Travis M. Wohlers and Sarah R. Holland of Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, of Austin, TX, on the brief for 3M Company.

Eric J. Maurer, Boies, Schiller & Flex-ner, LLP, of Washington, DC, on the brief for Floorgraphics, Inc.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Sunrise Holdings Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Holdings Limited.








Date: December 24, 2009
/s/ Xuguang Sun


Xuguang
Sun, Chief Executive Officer and President
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 12

- 00 137

- CR EX PARTE Roberto GARCIA Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barna r d, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 14, 2012
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On March 2, 2012, relator Roberto Garcia filed an original petition for writ of hab eas corpus in this court. However, as an intermediate court of appeals this court is not authorized to grant the relief requested. Pursuant to section 22.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil matters, a court of appeals “may issue a writ of habea s corpus when it appears that the restraint of liberty is by virtue of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of the violation of an order, judgment, or decree previously made, rendered, or entered by the court or judge in a ci vil case.” T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). However, in criminal matters, a court of appeals has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Watson v. State , 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Dodson v. State , 988 S.W.2d 833,

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011

- CR

- 2719 , styled State of Texas v. Roberto Garcia , pending in the 399 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez Gardner presiding

.04

- 12

- 00137

- CR

- 2

- 835 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1999, no pet.). In criminal matters, the courts authorized to issue writs of habeas corpus are the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 11.05 (West 2005). Therefore, we dismiss this petition for writ of habeas for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Kerry Chung, the Chief Executive Officer
of HW Holdings, Inc., certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the
period ended December 31, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results
of operations of the Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Date: April 8, 2015 | HW Holdings, Inc.                                           
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |                                                             
|                    | By:                                                         
|                    | Name:  Kerry Chung
        Title:    Chief Executive Officer
|                    |                                                             



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5134]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6615-9]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information 
(202) 564-7167 www/epa/gov/oeca/ofa

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements.
Filed February 19, 2001, through February 23, 2001.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 010054, DRAFT EIS, BLM, NV, Phoenix Project, Expansion of 
Current Mining Operations and Processing Activities, Battle Mountain, 
Plan of Operations, Lander County, NV, Due: May 04, 2001, Contact: Pam 
Jarnecke (775) 635-4144.
EIS No. 010055, DRAFT EIS, FAA, KY, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky 
International Airport, Construction and Operation of a New 8,000-foot 
Runway 17/35 (Future 18R/36L); 2,000-foot Extension of Runway 9/27, 
Funding and Airport Layout Plan, (ALP) Boone County, KY, Due: May 01, 
2001, Contact: Peggy S. Kelly (901) 544-3495.
EIS No. 010056, DRAFT SUPPLEMENT, COE, KY, Lower Cumberland and 
Tennessee Rivers Navigation Improvements, Kentucky Lock Addition, 
Implementation, Nashville District, Marshall and Livingston Counties, 
KY, Due: April 16, 2001, Contact: Tim Higgs (615) 736-7863.
EIS No. 010057, FINAL EIS, TVA, TN, Future Water Supply Needs in the 
Upper Duck River Basin, NPDES Permit and COE Section 404 Permit, 
Bedford, Marshall, Maury and Williamson Counties, TN, Due: April 02, 
2001, Contact: Linda B. Oxendine (865) 632-3440.
EIS No. 010058, FINAL EIS, BLM, NV, Red Rock Canyon National 
Conservation Area (RRCNCA), General Management Plan (GMP), Amendment to 
the Las Vegas Resource Management Plan, Las Vegas, NV, Due: April 02, 
2001, Contact: Gene Arnesen (702) 647-5068.
EIS No. 010059, DRAFT SUPPLEMENT, FTA, CA, Los Angeles Eastside 
Corridor Transit Improvements, Updated Information on the Light Rail 
Transit (LRT) Build Alternative and Three Transition Options, Extending 
from Union Station to Beverly and Atlantic Boulevards in East Los 
Angeles, via Alameda St., 1st. Street, Indiana St., 3rd Street, and 
Beverly Boulevard, Due: April 17, 2001, Contact: Erv Poka (213) 202-
3952.

    Dated: February 27, 2001.
Joseph C. Montgomery,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 01-5134 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M