alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                  S. 2

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, to correct a 
                           scrivener's error.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Effective Prosecution of Possession 
of Biological Toxins and Agents Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE POSSESSION OF BIOLOGICAL TOXINS AND AGENTS.

    Section 175b of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``(a)(1) No restricted'' and all 
                that follows through the end of paragraph (1) and 
                inserting the following:
    ``(a) Offense.--
            ``(1) In general.--It shall be unlawful for a restricted 
        person to--
                    ``(A) ship, transport, or possess in or affecting 
                interstate or foreign commerce any biological agent or 
                toxin described in paragraph (2); or
                    ``(B) receive any biological agent or toxin 
                described in paragraph (2) that has been shipped or 
                transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
            ``(2) Agents and toxins covered.--A biological agent or 
        toxin described in this paragraph is a biological agent or 
        toxin that--
                    ``(A) is listed as a non-overlap or overlap select 
                biological agent or toxin under part 73 of title 42, 
                Code of Federal Regulations, pursuant to section 351A 
                of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262a); and
                    ``(B) is not excluded or exempted under part 73 of 
                title 42, Code of Federal Regulations.''; and
                    (B) by striking ``(2) Whoever'' and inserting ``(3) 
                Penalty.--Whoever'' and adjusting the margin 
                accordingly; and
            (2) in subsection (d), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by inserting ``Definitions.--'' before ``In this 
        section:''.

            Passed the Senate December 18, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                  S. 2

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, to correct a 
                           scrivener's error.
```
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Sellers, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Sellers,*123 Ohio St.3d 128, 2009-Ohio-4907.]

*129(No. 2009-0547

Submitted August 11, 2009

Decided September 22, 2009.)

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kristen L. Sobieski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Thomas Rein, for appellee.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Harris,*122 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
2009-2089.

#### Mubashshir v. Sheldon.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 31, 2011 | /s/ David Bychkov                |   |
|--------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|               | David Bychkov                    |   |
|               | President, Chief Financial       |   |
|               | Officer, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|               | (Principal financial officer)    |   |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7995

JOSEPH J. SCHEPIS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus G. MALDONADO, JR., Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-04-276-0-17BD) Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Schepis v. Maldonado , No. CA-04-276-0-17BD (D.S.C. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Rural Utilities Service

          - 7 CFR Part 1786

      ( print page 15785)    

### CFR Correction

In Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1600 to 1899, revised as of Jan. 1, 2001, § 1786.31 is corrected by removing the second paragraph (c) on page 1018. 

[FR Doc. 01-55509 Filed 3-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
THIRD AMENDMENT TO

CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

	This Amendment made this 14th day of December, 1999, by ConnecticutNatural Gas Corporation ("CNG"), for the purpose of amending its DeferredCompensation Plan (the "Plan");

W I T N E S S E T H:

	WHEREAS, by written Plan instrument dated February 26, 1999, CNGadopted an amended and restated Deferred Compensation Plan; and

	WHEREAS, CNG wishes to amend the Plan in the particulars set forth below;and

	WHEREAS, CNG reserved the right to amend the Plan; and

	WHEREAS, the Plan was previously amended by a First Amendment thereto anda Second Amendment thereto;

	NOW, THEREFORE, CNG hereby amends the Plan as follows:

	1.	The following new paragraph (e) is added to Section 4.5,effective October 1, 1999:

	"(e)  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 4.5,subject to such rules as the Committee may prescribe, amounts deferred underSections 4.1(a) through (c), 4.1(d), and 4.2 may be assumed to be deferred morefrequently than monthly (as of the last day of each month), or as of a differentdate or dates within the month, in order to pattern more closely the Company'spayroll practices and procedures in effect from time to time.  However, thistiming difference shall not result in an increase in the amount to be deferredunder the Plan.  Such amounts may be utilized (by the Company or the Trustee ofa "rabbi trust" established in conjunction with this Plan) to purchase assets atsuch earlier time as the deferral is deemed to have occurred, or within areasonable period of time thereafter, in accordance with the provisions ofSection 4.5(d) hereof."

	2.	Except as hereinabove modified and amended, the Plan, as amended,shall remain in full force and effect.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CNG hereby executes this Amendment on the day andyear first above written.

 

						CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS

						CORPORATION

 

						By	JeanMcCarthy                    
						Its  Vice President Human Resources 
 

 

349402
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*May 11, 2010*

[Cite as *05HH2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-2046.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2010-0526.

#### Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P. v. Healthcare Imaging Solutions, L.L.C.

Summit App. No. 24699, 2010-Ohio-418. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to strike notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied, and appellant shall file a memorandum in response within 30 days of the date of this entry.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: ALFREDO JOSHUA LOYA

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00348-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before the Court is Husband’s petition for writ of mandamus in the underlying divorce 

suit. In the petition, Husband seeks relief from the trial court’s order requiring him to pay $50,000 

of Wife’s interim attorney’s fees from a trust account.

1

Husband must meet two requirements to demonstrate he is entitled to relief by mandamus. 

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). He must 

show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he has no adequate remedy by 

appeal. Id. at 135–36.

Husband argues that the trial court clearly abused its discretion in making the interim 

attorney’s fees award, as it “without reference to any guiding rules, evidence, or principles of law.”

1 The order further states “said amount will be considered when the court determines the just and right division of 

the marital estate.”
2

In his statement of the case, he asserts “[a]t issue here is a temporary order for $50,000 in attorney’s 

fees to be paid with only three days’ notice and is beyond Relators ability to pay.”2 He states that

the fees would deplete the community estate, rather than benefit the parties, and cause “irreparable 

harm.”

Aside from his naked assertions and legal references regarding requirements to examine 

Wife’s need for this amount of attorney’s fees and weigh Wife’s needs against his ability to pay,

Husband has provided no record substantiating his claims that the trial court acted arbitrarily.

Accordingly, we are unable to conclude that the trial court clearly abused its discretion.

As Husband has not established he is entitled to mandamus relief, we deny his petition for 

writ of mandamus.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

December 21, 2023 

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.

2 Husband’s petition notes that the trial court’s order gave him just three days to comply; however, this Court stayed

the portion of the trial court’s order requiring the payment of fees pending the resolution of this mandamus action.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 279 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 

provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 

to modify a provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sand Acquisition, 

5 Nourishment, and Development Act’’ or the ‘‘SAND Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF BEACH FILL. 

7 Section 935 of the Water Resources Development Act 

8 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2299) is amended by striking ‘‘if such 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 279 IS

1 materials are not available from domestic sources for envi2 ronmental or economic reasons’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ROMANIA - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Meat to the United States

December 27, 2023

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*)

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted

6 S.C. Smithfiled Prod S.R.L. (Source Establishment Only) 09/19/2023

43 S.C. Vascar S.A. 09/19/2023

* 46 Salbac S.A. 09/19/2023

400 S.C. Scandia Food S.R.L. 09/19/2023

** 731 Cris-Tim Family Holding S.R.L. 09/19/2023

* Change of Est. name from S.C. Salbac S.A., to Salbac S.A. (effective 12/23/2023)

** Change of Est. name from S.C. Cris-Tim Family Holding S.R.L., TO Cris-Tim 

 Family Holding S.R.L. (effective 12/23/2023)

Page 1
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                            Apex PC Solutions, Inc.
                    Computation of Net Income Per Share
                             for the quarters ended
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   MARCH 31,     MARCH 28,
                                                                     1996           1997
                                                                 -------------  ------------
<S>                                                              <C>            <C>
Net income.....................................................  $     984,100  $   1,835,562
                                                                 -------------  -------------
                                                                 -------------  -------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding.....................      5,600,000      8,837,028
Common stock equivalents -- Series A redeemable and convertible
  preferred stock..............................................      2,155,000      1,213,736
Common Stock equivalents -- stock options......................      1,336,932        684,900
                                                                 -------------  -------------
Weighted average shares used in computing net income 
  Per share....................................................      9,091,932     10,735,664
                                                                 -------------  -------------
                                                                 -------------  -------------
Net income per share...........................................  $        0.11  $        0.17
                                                                 -------------  -------------
                                                                 -------------  -------------
</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2953 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand access to capital 

for rural-area small businesses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2018 

Mr. JONES (for himself, Mr. HELLER, Ms. HEITKAMP, and Mr. KENNEDY) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to expand 

access to capital for rural-area small businesses, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Access to 

5 Capital for Rural Job Creators Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR RURAL-AREA SMALL BUSI7 NESSES. 

8 Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

9 (15 U.S.C. 78d(j)) is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2953 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (4)(C), by inserting ‘‘rural2 area small businesses,’’ after ‘‘women-owned small 

3 businesses,’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (6)(B)(iii), by inserting 

5 ‘‘rural-area small businesses,’’ after ‘‘women-owned 

6 small businesses,’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
EX-34.17
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 3300
1100 Walnut Street
Kansas City, MO 64106-2129
USA

Tel:+1 816 474 6180
www.deloitte.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, Inc., (the "Company"), an indirect wholly
owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for its role in servicing Commercial Mortgage Backed
Securities Transactions (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December
31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)((B), (C) and
(D)), 1122(d)3(ii) through 3(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. Management's assertion identifies the transactions
defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in the
Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance
arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above
that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31,2007, for its role in servicing Commercial Mortgage Backed
Securities Transactions is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Kansas City, MO
February 18, 2008
2009-2035.

#### State ex rel. Bensman v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections.

Lucas App. No.. L-08-1211. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4649-N-11]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Announcement of OMB Approval Number. 

# SUMMARY:

The purpose of this notice is to announce the OMB approval number for the collection of information pertaining to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) Program.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Ophelia Wilson, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, Southwest, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) 708-1590. This is not a toll-free number.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended), this notice advises that OMB has responded to the Department's request for approval of the information collection pertaining to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) Program. The OMB approval number for this information collection is 2506-0122, which expires on February 29, 2004.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Dated: February 28, 2001.

Donna M. Abbenante,

Acting, General Deputy Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-5548 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M