alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.15
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 1500
191 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303-1943
USA

Tel: +1 404 220 1500
www.deloitte.com


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors of
LNR Partners Inc.
Miami Beach, Florida

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that LNR Partners Inc. (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions for which the Asserting Party served as special servicer, that
were completed on or after January 1, 2006, and that were registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria
229.1122(d)(1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), (3)(i)(D), (3)(ii), (3)(iii), (3)(iv), (4)(v),
(4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii) and (4)(xv), which management
has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company
with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included
in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 22, 2008


Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7698
JOHN PRICE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Officers; MEDICALDEPARTMENT; OFFICERS OF GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, DistrictJudge. (CA-92-1560-AM, CA-93-13-AM, CA-93-14-AM, CA-93-15-AM, CA93-16-AM) Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 19, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Price, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Price v. Department of Corrections , Nos. CA-92-1560-AM; CA93-13-AM; CA-93-14-AM; CA-93-15-AM; CA-93-16-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 28,1994). We modify the district court's order to one of dismissal because the unexecuted affidavits on which the district court relied were insufficient to support any findings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (required form of affidavits). Further, the record does not support the district court's statement that Appellant was given the notice required by Roseboro v. Garrison , 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Jack N. Mayer, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of Powersafe Technology Corp. (the “Company”) certifies,
under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:  October 23,
2009







/s/
      Jack N. MayerPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
      Treasurer  (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer)







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2010-0437.

#### State v. Graves.

Ashland App. No. 08-COA-034, 2009-Ohio-2976. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
2009-1170.

#### Jewell v. Victorian Village Internal Medicine, Inc.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-919, 2009-Ohio-2233.
#### Raul ALEMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAN ANTONIO POLICE DEPARTMENT; Officer M. Gonzales, #0669; Officer Tomas A. Alonso, # 2135, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-50109

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 11, 2011.

Raul Aleman, Jr., Beeville, TX, pro se.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Raul Aleman, Jr., Texas prisoner # 1566499, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against the San Antonio Police Department and two of its officers. Aleman argues that the district court erred in concluding that the suit was time barred because he presented a timely complaint to prison officials while housed at the Bexar County Jail but that the officials lost the complaint. He also argues that “most states” allow a litigant “up to (5 1/2) year’s” to file suit and that whenever a litigant appeals their claims from one state to another, the statute of limitations changes.

A district court shall dismiss a prisoner’s in forma pauperis complaint if the court determines, inter alia, that the complaint is frivolous. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Claims that are clearly time barred are properly dismissed under § 1915. *Gonzales v. Wyatt,*157 F.3d 1016, 1019-20 (5th Cir.1998). Review is for an abuse of discretion. *Stanley v. Foster,*464 F.3d 565, 568 (5th Cir.2006).

A pro se prisoner’s pleading is deemed filed on the date it is provided to prison officials for mailing. *See Cooper v. Brookshire,*70 F.3d 377, 379 (5th Cir.1995). However, Aleman offered nothing to substantiate his claim that he presented a timely complaint to prison officials for mailing. Aleman did not include in his pleadings any sworn statement attesting to *710the alleged timely filing. Nor did he provide a date on which he gave the filing to prison officials for mailing. Based on such, it cannot be said that the district court’s factual finding that Aleman did not timely file a complaint is clearly erroneous. *See Anderson v. City of Bessemer City,*470 U.S. 564, 573, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985).

Aleman does not provide any authority in support of his assertion that the applicable statute of limitations is over five years. However, it is well-settled that the limitations period applicable to § 1983 cases in the forum state of Texas is the two-year period provided by Texas law. *See Stanley,*464 F.3d at 568. Aleman thus has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint as time barred.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of RINO International Corporation on
      Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 3, for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of RINO International Corporation
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Jade Mountain Corporation.




By:
            /s/
                Zou DejunZou
                DejunChief
                Executive OfficerBy:
            /s/
                Bruce RichardsonBruce
                RichardsonChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to RINO International Corporation and will be retained by RINO
      International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




August
      1,
      2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1999 BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,974,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                   112,420
<INVENTORY>                                 17,595,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,489,103
<PP&E>                                       8,308,322
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,302,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,863,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,697,930
<BONDS>                                     23,896,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,854,893
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,547
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,604,441)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,863,557
<SALES>                                     12,005,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,005,898
<CGS>                                        9,549,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,044,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             583,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                377,914
<INCOME-TAX>                                   132,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            245,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   245,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            26,116
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  26,231
<CASH>                                           4,129
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,838
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  4,723
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,838
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                867
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  24
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      77
<BENEFITS>                                         128
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         26
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    636
<INCOME-TAX>                                       223
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        



</TABLE>
EX-35.1
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2007 (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement") by and among Wachovia Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as
Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Trustee and LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer

WBCMT 2007-C31


I, Susan K. Chapman, a Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc. as Special Servicer
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, on behalf of the Special Servicer
and not in my individual capacity, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under the
   Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period ending the end of the
   fiscal year 2007 (the "Reporting Period") and the Special Servicer's
   performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my
   supervision; and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has
   fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all
   material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


LNR PARTNERS, INC.



By: /s/ Susan K. Chapman
Susan K. Chapman
Vice President
EXHIBIT  32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of ENHANCE SKIN PRODUCTS INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Brian LukianDate: April 6, 2010

Brian LukianChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
15.2


Consent
of Jun He Law offices, PRC Counsel




June 26,
2009





CHINA
SUNERGY CO., LTD.





No. 123
Focheng West Road


Jiangning
Economic & Technical Development Zone,


Nanjing,
Jiangsu 211100,


People’s
Republic of China





Dear Sir
or Madam:





We hereby
consent to the references to us by CHINA SUNERGY CO., LTD. (“the Company”) under
the heading “Risks Related to Doing Business in China” in the Annual Report on
Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.




Yours
faithfully,


For and
on behalf of





/s/ JUN
HE LAW OFFICES


JUN HE
LAW OFFICES
#### In the Matter of Hereford Insurance Co., as Subrogee of Asim Bordan, Respondent, v American Independent Insurance, Appellant.

[24 NYS3d 909]—

*552Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered May 23, 2014, which granted petitioner’s motion to confirm an arbitration award in favor of petitioner and against respondent, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 75 dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The motion court erred in concluding that it had personal jurisdiction over respondent simply because the arbitration occurred in New York and respondent never contested the arbitrator’s jurisdiction. Respondent, a Pennsylvania corporation that had insured the offending vehicle, has no contacts with New York, and the offending vehicle was neither registered in New York nor owned by a New York resident *(see Matter of American Tr. Ins. Co. v Hoque,*45 AD3d 329, 329 [1st Dept 2007]; *Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Basedow,*28 AD3d 766, 767 [2d Dept 2006]). Accordingly, the motion court lacked personal jurisdiction over respondent.

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Mid-State Bancshares (the“Company”) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of theCompany for such period.

 

 
| Date: August  13, 2003 | /s/ James W.  Lokey         |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                   | James W.  Lokey             |   |
|                   | **President**               |
|                   | **Chief Executive Officer** |
|                   |
|                   |
| Date: August  13, 2003 | /s/ James G.  Stathos       |   |
|                   | James G.  Stathos           |   |
|                   | Executive  Vice President,  |
|                   | Chief  Financial Officer    |
|                        |                             |        |  |  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, and amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Panel for Social and Political Sciences (#1761).                    

*Date/Time:*                         March 23, 2001; 8 a.m. to 6 pm.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 970; Arlington, VA.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Frank Scioli and Dr. James Granato, Program Directors for Political Science, National Science Foundation. Telephone: (703) 292-8762.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate the political science proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning support for research proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.                    

*Reason For Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These maters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: March 1, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-5466  Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
2009-1607.

#### State v. McGee.

Cuyahoga App. No. 91638, 2009-Ohio-3374.

O’Connor, J., dissents and would accept the appeal, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and remand the cause to the trial court to apply *State v. Boswell,*121 Ohio St.3d 575, 2009-Ohio-1577, 906 N.E.2d 422.

Lanzinger, J., dissents.