alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Abatement Order filed October 6, 2011. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00793-CV

____________

AGILITY PROJECT LOGISTICS, INC., Appellant

V.

CONTRACTORS CARGO COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-22108

ABATEMENT ORDER

We have determined that this case is appropriate for referral to mediation, an 

alternative dispute resolution process. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ''

154.021—.073. Mediation is a forum in which an impartial person, the mediator, 

facilitates communication between parties to promote reconciliation or settlement. Id. '

154.023(a). Any communication relating to the subject matter of the appeal made by a 

participant in the mediation proceeding is confidential. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 

' 154.053. After mediation, the parties shall advise the court whether the case settled, or

whether any further negotiation efforts are planned. 
2

The court ORDERS the appeal ABATED for a period of sixty days and refers the 

underlying dispute to mediation. Any party may file a written objection to this order with 

the clerk of this court within 10 days of the date of this order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 

Code ' 154.022. If this court finds that there is a reasonable basis for the objection, the 

objection shall be sustained and the appeal reinstated on this court’s active docket. See id.

The court ORDERS that the mediation be held within 60 days of the date of this 

order. The court ORDERS that all parties or their representatives with full settlement 

authority shall attend the mediation process, with their counsel of record. The court

FURTHER ORDERS that within 48 hours of completion of the mediation, the parties 

shall advise the court in writing whether the case settled.

If mediation fully resolves the issues in the case, the court ORDERS the parties to 

file a motion to dismiss the appeal, other dispositive motion, or a motion for additional 

time to file the dispositive motion, within 10 days of the conclusion of the mediation. 

The court ORDERS the appellate timetable in this case suspended for 60 days from 

the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court=s 

active docket for a period of sixty days. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active 

docket after sixty days. Any party may file a motion stating grounds for reinstating the 

appeal before the end of the sixty-day period. Any party may also file a motion to dismiss 

the appeal or other dispositive motion at any time. Any party may file a motion to extend 

the abatement period for completion of mediation or to finalize a settlement. 

PER CURIAM
Franklin Credit Holding Corporation 10-Q


Exhibit 32.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Credit Holding Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul D. Colasono, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










U/s/ Paul D. ColasonoU


Paul D. Colasono


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


August 15, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Franklin Credit Holding Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.2Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of First Trinity Financial Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies that:To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  March 26, 2008 By:  /s/ William Lay    William Lay, Secretary, Treasurer and    Chief Financial Officer
#### Adelaja Allen AROJURAYE, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, and Department of Defense, Intervenor.

No. 2011-3034.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Department of Defense’s motion to reform the caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent and the motion for leave to intervene,

It Is Ordered That:

The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board and the Department should calculate their brief due dates from the date of filing of this order.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Paul B. Murphy, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of the registrants board of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated: November 3, 2004/s/ Paul B. Murphy, Jr.Paul B. Murphy, Jr.
Director and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Euramax International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending April 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Scott Vansant,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)   the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ R.  SCOTT VANSANT                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| R. Scott Vansant                      |
| Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
| May 16, 2005                     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                         47,159
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,275,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    4,996,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,343,317
<PP&E>                                         5,761,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,249,318)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,073,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,727,993
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,124,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,073,142
<SALES>                                        5,869,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,869,358
<CGS>                                          3,283,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,825,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (87,751)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (43,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,202)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 32.01 - SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I, Shaun D. O'Brien, the Chief Financial Officer of CIS Investments, Inc. ("CISI"), the Managing Owner of JWH Global Trust
        (the "Trust"), and I, James A. Davison, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
        CISI, certify that (i) the attached Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
        attached Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Trust.





|James A. Davison
         President and Chief Executive Officer
         CIS Investments, Inc.
         November 12, 2004 |  | Shaun D. O'Brien
         Chief Financial Officer
         CIS Investments, Inc.
         November 12, 2004
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2185

MORRIS E. LEWIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SALLIE MAE CORPORATION (SLM), and Other

Unnamed Defendants,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:06-mc-00041-LMB)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris E. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Esposito, AKIN,

GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

Although Lewis noted only the order denying an extension of

time in his notice of appeal, in his informal brief he states that

he is appealing the district court’s orders dismissing his

complaint, denying his motion to amend judgment, and denying his

amended motion to amend judgment. The latest of these orders was

entered on the district court’s docket on August 23, 2006, and

Lewis had until September 22, 2006, to file a notice of appeal. He

did not file his notice of appeal until October 27, 2006. We

therefore lack jurisdiction to consider his arguments related to

these orders.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Morris E. Lewis appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for an extension of time in which to file a

notice of appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5).* Parties in

a civil action in which the United States is not a party have

thirty days following a final order in which to file a notice of

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). The only exceptions to the

appeal period are when the district court extends the time to

appeal based upon excusable neglect under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5),

or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). These

time periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir.,

Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (internal quotations and

citations omitted). We review the district court’s denial of a

motion for an extension of time for abuse of discretion.

Thompson v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 76 F.3d 530, 532 n.2 (4th

Cir. 1996). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the

district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we

affirm. We deny Lewis’ “Motion to Supplement Appeals File” and
- 3 -

his “Motion to Overcome Dismissal with Prejudice Orders.” We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 State Offices
 ALAKAZARCACOCTDEFLGAHIIDILINIAKSKYLAMEMDMAMIMNMSMOMTNENVNHNJNMNYNCNDOHOKORPARISCSDTNTXUTVTVAWAWVWIWYDCPBPRVI
  Please select a State: AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming    Submit
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
Exhibit 4.23
English Translation
 NOTICE OF AMENDMENT OR CANCELLATION OF CONTRACTClient Name
    
    Unitec Europa, S.A.
    
    Date of Execution
    
    February 26, 2007Contract Number
    
    YL-UE-070302
    
    Total Volume
    
    20 mega wattProduct Model &
Quantity
    
    YL120(23)P1335X990
YL180(23)P1335X990Unit Price
    
    2.83 EUR/WP
    
    Total Price
    
    56,600,000.00EURTerm of Payment
    
    payment by 90-day promissory noteTime of Delivery
    
    Feb: 1 mega watt; Mar: 1 mega watt; Apr: 2 mega watt; May: 3 mega watt;
Jun: 3 mega watt; Jul: 3 mega watt; Aug: 3 mega watt; Sep: 2 mega watt;
Oct: 2 mega watt.
 Upon consultation and negotiation with the other party, terms of the Contract shall be modified as follow:1.
    
    The Unit Price under the Contract shall be changed as: NO CHANGE2.
    
    The Time of Delivery shall be changed as: NO CHANGE1) Change within current year o2) Change cross-year o3.
    
    The remaining volume in the Contract after the cancellation:Volume performed:
Volume remained:Reasons for changing or cancelling the Contract:Losses and damages incurred to us due to the change or cancellation of the Contract:
Changing the total volume under the Contract:
Original total volume: 20 mega watt
New total volume: 20. 087640 mega watt
Reasons for amending the Contract are the following: In performing the 20 mega watt Contract, the last lot
to be shipped was less than container load. Upon mutual consultation, the other party expected for a full
container load for shipment. In accordance with the other partys requirement, we shipped a 170 watt
container which was in excess of 87,690 watt than the volume originally agreed in the Contract.
 Signature:
    
    Signature:
    
    Signature:/s/ Zelin Zhao
    
    /s/ Qian Zhang
/s/ Yan Ma
    
    /s/ Shuozhen LiDepartment Manager
    
    General Manager
(General Sales Company)
    
    COO
    
    General Manager
APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2009-0618.

#### State v. Addison.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90642, 2009-Ohio-221.
#### LOUIS B. FINE FAMILY, LLC, Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Appellee.

No. 2006-1529.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 29, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Louis B. Fine Family, LLC’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing its appeal *986for failure to file a joint appendix, the joint appendix now having been filed,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The court’s March 2, 2007, dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
                                                /S/ Gerald S. Blaskie
                                                ---------------------
                                                Gerald S. Blaskie
                                                Chief Financial Officer of
                                                Superconductive Components, Inc.
                                                August 13, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         322,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,767,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                   201,205
<INVENTORY>                                    571,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,372,020
<PP&E>                                       5,502,044
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,370,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,810,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,989,129
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,904
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,330,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,810,055
<SALES>                                      9,244,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,244,562
<CGS>                                        3,597,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,597,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,405,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             313,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,002,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                   400,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            601,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   601,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>