alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2010-0329.

#### State v. Taylor.

Athens App. No. 09CA22, 2010-Ohio-141. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, *State v. Bodyke,*Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, and IV only.

Motion to consolidate denied as moot.
Document

Exhibit 10.15

Amendment to Employment Agreement
This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of May 18, 2020 by and between Scientific Games Corporation, a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) and Michael Winterscheidt (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 27, 2017, which was then amended as of February 25, 2019, and was then further amended as of March 27, 2020 (with amendments, the “Agreement”);
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
1.Eligibility for Cash Awards.  The Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 3(g) to the Agreement:
“If Executive is an employee of the Company on November 30, 2020, then he shall receive, within ten (10) business days after that date, an amount equal to one hundred twenty-five thousand U.S. dollars ($125,000), less applicable withholdings.  If Executive is an employee of the Company on February 28, 2021, then he shall receive, within ten (10) business days after that date, an additional amount equal to fifty thousand U.S. dollars ($50,000), less applicable withholdings.  These amounts shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, other compensation for which Executive is eligible pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement.”
2. Except as set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.  All references to the “Agreement” in the Agreement shall refer to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Any defined terms used in this Amendment and not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Agreement.
        3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this Amendment by electronic transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed this Amendment as of May 18, 2020.
SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION


By:   /s/ James Sottile   
Name: James Sottile 
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
        
/s/ Michael Winterscheidt  
Michael Winterscheidt
1
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2798

To revive the suspension of duty on 3,5,6-trichlorosalicylic acid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1993

Mr. SHAYS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To revive the suspension of duty on 3,5,6-trichlorosalicylic

acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY.

5 Heading 9902.29.90 (relating to 3,5,6-

6 trichlorosalicylic acid) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

7 of the United States is amended by striking out ‘‘12/31/

8 92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

11 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from
2

•HR 2798 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO TERMINATION OF

4 PREVIOUS SUSPENSION.—Notwithstanding section 514 of

5 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro6 vision of law, upon proper request filed with the appro7 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

8 of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal

9 from warehouse for consumption, of any good provided for

10 under heading 9902.29.90 of the Harmonized Tariff

11 Schedule of the United States shall, if such entry or with12 drawal was made—

13 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

14 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en15 actment of this Act;

16 be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or with17 drawal occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
=- Untted States Department of Agrteutture 

Iceland - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Meat to the United States 

May 18, 2023 

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*) 

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted

 A022 Slaturhus KVH ehf. 05/16/2002

 A081 Slaturfelag Suourlands svf. 05/16/2002
#### Stephen N. DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA BEACH CORRECTIONAL CENTER; Virginia Beach Correctional Medical Department, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 09-8117.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 10, 2011.

Decided: Feb. 1, 2011.

Stephen N. Daniel, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*672PER CURIAM:

Stephen N. Daniel appeals the district court’s order dismissing Daniel’s complaint for failure to demonstrate exhaustion of administrative remedies and noncompliance with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Daniel v. Va. Beach Corr. Ctr.,*No. 1:09-cv-00385-CMH-JFA (E.D.Va. Oct. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-20527

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTONIO DE JESUS VALDEZ ROJAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-700-1

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio De Jesus Valdez Rojas appeals his conviction for illegal reentry 

into the United States following a previous deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326. In his guilty plea, Valdez Rojas reserved the right to appeal the district 

court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. See FED R. CRIM.

P. 11(a)(2). Relying on Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), as he did in 

his motion to dismiss the indictment, Valdez Rojas argues that his prior 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 8, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-20527 Document: 00515375422 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2020
No. 19-20527

2

removal order was invalid because the notice to appear was defective for failing 

to include the date and time of his removal hearing. According to Valdez Rojas, 

his prior removal therefore could not support a conviction for illegal reentry 

under § 1326, and the removal proceeding was fundamentally unfair requiring 

dismissal of the instant indictment. Valdez Rojas concedes that his challenges 

are foreclosed by United States v. Pedroza-Rocha, 933 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2019), 

petition for cert. filed (U.S. Nov. 6, 2019) (No. 19-6588), and Pierre-Paul v. Barr, 

930 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 2019), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Dec. 16, 2019) (No. 19-

779), but he raises the issues to preserve them for further review. The 

Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, agreeing 

that the issues are foreclosed by Pedroza-Rocha and Pierre-Paul.

Summary affirmance is appropriate if “the position of one of the parties 

is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question 

as to the outcome of the case.” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 

1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The parties are correct that Valdez Rojas’s arguments 

are foreclosed. See Pedroza-Rocha, 933 F.3d at 492-98. Accordingly, the 

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the 

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-20527 Document: 00515375422 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2020
2009-2234.

#### Musleve v. Musleve.

Stark App. No. 2009CA00014, 2009-Ohio-5789. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1478, 2010-Ohio-354, 921 N.E.2d 248. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13738-13739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6949-9]


Metalex Superfund Site; Notice of Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed agreement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to enter into 
an agreement with Libby Corporation pursuant to 122 of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
of 1980, as amended, regarding the Metalex Superfund Site located in 
Lexington County, Lexington, South Carolina. EPA will consider public 
comments on the proposed settlement for thirty (30) days. EPA may 
withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate the

[[Page 13739]]

proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate. Copies of 
the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, 
U.S. EPA, Region 4 (WMD-CPSB), Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887.
    Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor within thirty 
(30) calendar days of the date of the publication.

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
Franklin E. Hill,
Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 01-5564 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASCO INTERNATIONAL FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         721,271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,490,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,101,763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,429,244
<PP&E>                                       5,091,134
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,629,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,633,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,997,770
<BONDS>                                      2,362,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,832
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,417,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,633,261
<SALES>                                      4,864,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,864,494
<CGS>                                        2,579,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,621,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            190,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                930,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   954,282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31(a)****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**     I, James L. Simonton, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Core Molding Technologies, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s first fiscal quarter in the case of the quarterly report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 11, 2006                                 /s/ James L. Simonton   James L. Simonton   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7455
AALON SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant,

verus VIRGINIA MEDICAL DEPARTMENT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PAGE TOUE, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-05-138-GBL) Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 30, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aalon Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Aalon Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s previous orders to particularize and amend the complaint and to inform the court whether he had exhausted his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Va. Med. Dep’t for Dep’t of Corrs. , No. CA-05-138-GBL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Jenna L. Kemp, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
    10-K of Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-AR4 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
    do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
    respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
    by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
    Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
    obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
    of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
    and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
    this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
    provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Jenna L. Kemp
    Signature

    Executive Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
|   | 1. | The      Company’s Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   | /s/      Xiaoqun Ye                |
|--------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|  Date:      July 30, 2009 |   | Xiaoqun      Ye                    |
|                           |   | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                           |   | (Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                           |   |                               |
|                           |   | /s/      Yan Lin                   |
|  Date:      July 30, 2009 |   | Yan      Lin                       |
|                           |   | Chief      Accounting Officer      |
|                           |   | (Principal      Financial Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   I, Robert Ipson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, of Piranha Ventures, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  August 11, 2010 By: /s/ Robert Ipson  Robert Ipson  Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Piranha Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by Piranha Ventures, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Exceed Company Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Lin Shuipan, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 27, 2013 | /s/ Lin Shuipan                     
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                     | Lin Shuipan                         
|                     | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                     | (principal executive officer)