alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. CV

- 13 -1071 VICTORIA JANE FLEMING APPELLANT
V. KENNETH VEST, M.D. APPELLEE Opinion Delivered: October 29 , 2014
APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CV2011

- 164III ]
HONORABLE LYNN WILLIAMS , JUDGE
DISMISSED
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge Appellant appeals from the circuit court’s grant of appellee’s motion for summary judgment, thereby dismissing her wrongful-death claim against appellee. For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss appellant’s appeal. This case was previously before this court and was remanded for supplementation
of the record and rebriefing. 1 All rebriefing issues were corrected. However, all the
deficiencies in the record were not addressed. In our previous order, we specifically requested all documents dealing with and resolving Robert and Linda Lands’s cross -claims against Ouachita Regional Counseling and Mental Health Center, Inc. d/b/a Community Counseling Services and appellee. Appellant has failed to supply any documentation disposing of either

.

1 Fleming v. Vest , 2014 Ark. App. 327.2

Following our remand, the court below entered an order on June 11, 2014, stating
that: [T]he Court notes that the record as currently comprised does not include an Order disposing of R obert Fred Lands and Linda Lands’ Cross -Claim for
c ont ribution and indemnity against Ouachita Regional Counseling and Mental Health Center, Inc. d/b/a Community Counseling Services and Philadelphia In demnity Insurance Company, the parties having treated such Cross-Claim as moot by virtue of

the parties’ dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff ’ s claims against the Lands. It is clear from the circuit court’s language that there is no order disposing of the claims in question. Rule 2(a)(1) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure

– Civil states that an appeal may

— absent some exceptions that do not apply

— be taken from a final judgment
or decree. 2 Absent a Rule 54(b) certificate from the circuit court directing that the judgment is final, any judgment, order, or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties. 3 When a lawsuit contains more than one claim for relief, a judgment that adjudicates fewer than all of the claims is neither final nor appealable. 4 Accordingly, on the record before this court, the
order is not final.
Dismissed.
W HITEAKER and H IXSON , J J., agree.

2 (2013 ).

3 Ives Transp., Inc. v. Ives , 2014 Ark. App. 202, at 4 (citing Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)(2)).

4 Id . (citing Forever Green Athletic Fields, Inc. v. Lasiter Constr., Inc. , 2010 Ark. App. 483 (per curiam)).3

Bridges, Young, Matthews & Drake PLC , by: John P. Talbot , for appellant. Friday, Eldredge & Clark, LLP , by: T. Michelle Ator , for appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2849 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2849

 To provide for a program to be conducted by the Secretary of Defense 
                       relating to Lyme disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1993

   Mr. Smith  of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a program to be conducted by the Secretary of Defense 
                       relating to Lyme disease.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LYME DISEASE PROGRAM.

    (a) Program.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program 
relating to Lyme disease. The program shall be carried out through the 
Environmental Hygiene Agency of the Department of the Army. The 
Secretary shall provide that information relating to prevention, 
detection, or treatment of Lyme disease that is developed under the 
program and that may be applicable to the general public shall be 
disseminated to appropriate public health authorities.
    (b) Funding.--From funds available to the Army for fiscal year 1994 
for research, development, test, and evaluation, the sum of $1,000,000 
shall be available for the program under subsection (a), of which 
$500,000 shall be for one-time startup costs for equipment, facilities, 
and software development and $500,000 shall be for fiscal year 1994 
labor and operating expenses.

                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 6, 2017

No. 04-16-00797-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF MADELINE P. DAVILA, DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PC-3188

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief in this appeal was due February 2, 2017. Neither the brief nor a 

motion for extension of time has been filed. We order appellant to file, by February 16, 

2017, the appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining appellant’s 

failure to timely file the brief. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by 

the date ordered, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.8(a).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of February, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Bernardus WIRASTO; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73738.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 18, 2011.

Kathleen S. Koh, Law Offices of Kathleen S. Koh, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, *143OIL, Mark C. Walters, Esq., Jennifer L. Lightbody, Esq., R. Lynne Harris, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bernardus Wirasto and his wife and sons, all natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Wirasto did not establish eligibility for asylum, because the evidence does not compel the conclusion that the criminal proceedings pending against him in Indonesia constituted persecution or were motivated by his actual or imputed political opinion. *See Abedini v. U.S.,*971 F.2d 188, 191 (9th Cir.1992).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Wirasto did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal because the evidence does not distinguish the situation the petitioners potentially would face upon return to Indonesia from that experienced by all Christian' Indonesians, and the petitioners have not demonstrated the requisite level of individualized risk necessary to compel a finding of a clear probability of future persecution. *See Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1181 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc); *cf. Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir.2004).

Wirasto has forfeited any challenge to the IJ’s denial of CAT relief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not supported by argument in opening brief are waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

 

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “Administrative Agent”), dohereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2007-OA4 Trust for the 2007 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”): 

1.                  A review of the activities of the AdministrativeAgent during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,the Administrative Agent has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year, except that, prepayment fees due to investors were calculated incorrectly by the Administrative Agent on certain loanswith deferred interest, which amounts are required to be passed to investors in accordance with Section 3.04(b)(iv) of the applicable pooling and servicing agreement. The amount due as a result of these miscalculations will be delivered to the Trustee fordistribution once analysis of this matter has been completed and the amounts due have been determined.  Processes and procedures have been implemented and are currently being validated to provide for more accurate calculation of prepayment fees.

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 
| /s/ Barbara Campbell Name:  Barbara Campbell Title:    First Vice President |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
2009-2273.

#### State v. Heft.

Logan App. No. 8-09-08, 2009-Ohio-5908. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1508, 2010-Ohio-799, 922 N.E.2d 970. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The                         **Federal Register**                         notice dated Tuesday, November 21, 2000, page 69959, was submitted prematurely. This notice is hereby cancelled.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angie Tornes, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program, National Park Service, Midwest Field Office, 310 West Wisconsin Street, Suite 100E, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202; or telephone 414-297-3605. 

Dated: December 19, 2000.

David N. Given, 

Deputy Director, Midwest Region. 

[FR Doc. 01-50 Filed 1-2-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11




                         MARINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                   (UNAUDITED)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Six Months Ended             Three Months Ended
                                                     June 30,        June 30,        June 30,        June 30,
                                                       1997            1996            1997            1996
                                                   -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>      
Common shares outstanding at January 1:              2,701,110       2,007,576       2,701,110       2,007,576

IPO offering, May 7, 1997                            1,440,000                                       1,440,000

Other stock transactions in 1996, net:                                 693,534                         693,534
Other stock transactions in 1997, net:                 280,010                         280,010
                                                   -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------


Common shares outstanding on June 30,:               4,421,120       2,701,110       4,421,120       2,701,110

Adjustment to weighted average:                       (946,667)       (383,507)       (473,333)       (306,806)

Stock options                                           47,218          71,290          47,218          71,290

Warrants:                                              347,219         222,219         347,219         222,219

Convertible securities                                                 377,777                         377,777

Treasury stock adjustments                            (306,870)       (437,007)       (306,870)       (429,229)

Less:  receivable shares                                               (77,767)                        (77,767)
                                                   -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------

Weighted average outstanding shares @ June 30        3,562,020       2,474,115       4,035,354       2,558,594
                                                   ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========

Net loss for periods ending June 30,               $(1,449,344)    $  (421,755)    $  (921,490)    $  (182,832)
Adjustment for assumed 10% interest on proceeds
  from sales and proceeds used on treasury              61,374         114,323          30,687          57,162

Adjusted net loss:                                 $(1,387,970)    $  (307,432)    $  (890,803)    $  (125,670)
                                                   ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========

Earnings (loss) per share:                               (0.39)          (0.12)          (0.22)          (0.05)
</TABLE>

                 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
Exhibit 4.14
 ADDENDUM AGREEMENT NO. 3
 Addendum Agreement
 TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
 BETWEEN CARDIFF MARINE INC.
OF MONROVIA, LIBERIA, LAWFULLY REPRESENTED (HEREINAFTER
CARDIFF)
 AND
 OCEANRESOURCES OWNERS LIMITED (M/V JUNEAU)
OCEANCLARITY OWNERS LIMITED (M/T PINK SANDS)
OCEANFIGHTER OWNERS INC. (M/T OLINDA)
HEREINAFTER COLLECTIVELY THE OWNERS
  th st
 th th st
 th th st
    
  




---



##### 



 
  
  
  
    th st




---



##### 



/s/ Michael Gregos

ON BEHALF OF OCEANRESOURCES OWNERS LIMITEDBy: Michael GregosTitle: COO/s/ Michael Gregos

ON BEHALF OF OCEANCLARITY OWNERS LIMITEDBy: Michael GregosTitle: COO/s/ Michael Gregos


ON BEHALF OF OCEANFIGHTER OWNERS LIMITEDBy: Michael GregosTitle: COO/s/ Charalampos Alivizatos


ON BEHALF OF CARDIFF MARINE INC.By: Charalampos AlivizatosTitle: Legal Representative
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tilden Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") On Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I Robert
Baskind, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ ROBERT BASKIND
------------------------------
Robert Baskind
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer

Date:   June 20, 2006

                                       19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UNISOURCE WORLDWIDE, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     $59,318,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              777,797,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                24,673,000
<INVENTORY>                                472,138,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,329,411,000
<PP&E>                                     409,632,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             194,401,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,238,014,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      573,896,000
<BONDS>                                    627,142,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 945,943,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,238,014,000
<SALES>                                  5,208,482,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         5,208,482,000
<CGS>                                    4,321,991,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            4,321,991,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           766,066,000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            13,657,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          30,932,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             75,836,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                32,603,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         43,233,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               $43,233,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.64
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES, EXCLUDING PROVISION
FOR LOSSES ON ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*April 28, 2010*

[Cite as *04/2812010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-1822.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2010-0161.

#### State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Henry Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Lucy A. Dalglish, Gregg P. Leslie, and Mara E. Zimmerman by Monica L. Dias,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, consistent with the opinion released on April 13, 2010. See opinion at 125 Ohio St.3d 149, 2010-Ohio-1533, 926 N.E.2d 634.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

The late Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer did not participate in the ruling in this case.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*April 13, 2010*

[Cite as *04/13/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-1625.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

1997-1390.

#### State v. Cornwell.

Mahoning C.P. No. 96-CR-525. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellee’s motion to set execution date.

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

It is further ordered by the court that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

It is further ordered that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 00N-1441]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Infant Formula Requirements

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Infant Formula Requirements'' has 
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of November 9, 2000 
(65 FR 67388), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0256. 
The approval expires on February 29, 2004. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: February 23, 2001.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 01-5158 Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S