alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5526]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR01-5-000]


Chevron Products Company v. Anschutz Ranch East Pipeline, Inc. 
and Express Pipeline Partnership; Notice of Complaint

March 1, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2001, Chevron Products Company 
(Chevron) tendered for filing a complaint against Anschutz Ranch East 
Pipeline, Inc. (Anschutz) and Express Pipeline Partnership (Express).
    Chevron states that it is a shipper of crude oil and sour 
condensate on a local tariff filed by Anschutz for the shipment of 
crude petroleum and sour condensate originating at Frontier Station, 
Utah and Evanston Station, Wyoming and terminating in Kimball Junction, 
Utah. Chevron states that it is also a shipper of crude oil on joint 
tariffs published by Anschutz and Express for the shipment of crude 
petroleum between International boundary, Canada and Salt Lake City, 
Utah. Chevron alleges that the rates being charged on the Anschutz 
local tariff and on the Anschutz portion or division of the Anschutz/
Express joint tariffs are unjust and unreasonable and unduly 
discriminatory and unduly preferential, and, therefore, in violation of 
the Interstate Commerce Act. Chevron further maintains that the rates 
charged on the Express/Anschutz joint tariffs exceed ceiling price 
levels.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before March 20, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for 
assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before 
March 20, 2001. Comments and protests may be filed electronically via 
the internet if lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5526 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3318]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on February 23, 2001, I find that Holmes, Lowndes and Oktibbeha Counties in the State of Mississippi constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by Severe Storms and Tornadoes on February 16, 2001. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on April 24, 2001 and for economic injury until the close of business on November 23, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the following contiguous counties in Mississippi may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Attala, Carroll, Choctaw, Clay, Humphreys, Leflore, Madison, Monroe, Noxubee, Webster, Winston and Yazoo; Lamar and Pickens counties in the State of Alabama. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
7.000Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.500Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
7.000For Economic Injury:Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 331811. For economic injury the number is 9K8300 for Mississippi, and 9K8400 for Alabama. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008). Dated: February 26, 2001. Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator, For Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 01-5332 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
[No. 34790-3-II.

Division Two.

August 21, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Wayne Glenn, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 04-1-01457-1, Russell W. Hartman, J., entered April 28, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per QuinnBrintnall, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
2009-1276.

#### State v. Wolfe.

Montgomery App. No. 23232, 2009-Ohio-3045.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of MIPSolutions, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary MacDonald, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:       /s/ Gary MacDonald

Chief Executive Officer and Director



April 15, 2010



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jeffrey Steven EVANS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-4843.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 25, 2007.

Decided: March 14, 2007.

R. Deke Falls, Barnett & Falls, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Thomas Cullen, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*ON REHEARING*

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Steven Evans pled guilty to conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841, 846 (West 1999 *&*Supp.2006) (Count One), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000) (Count Four), and was sentenced to a term of seventy-eight months imprisonment. Evans appeals his sentence, alleging that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated by the district court’s factual finding that he possessed a firearm during the drug offense and application of a two-level enhancement.*
      *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2D1.1(b)(1) (2005). We affirm.

In the district court, Evans principally contested the weapon enhancement on factual grounds, but also challenged it under *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). Following the Supreme Court’s decision in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the sentencing court is required to calculate the appropriate advisory guideline range after making any necessary findings of fact, and consider the range in conjunction with all relevant factors under the guidelines and 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 *&*Supp. 2006), before imposing a sentence. *United*
      *288
      *States v. Hughes,*401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir.2005). The district court followed this procedure. Because Evans was sentenced under an advisory guideline scheme, no Sixth Amendment error occurred.

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

We previously affirmed Evans’ sentence using a plain error standard of review. Fed. R.Crim.P. 52(b). Evans filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, pointing out that, after sentence was pronounced, counsel informed the court that his client wished to challenge the enhancement under *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We therefore granted panel rehearing.
|                                 | Jurisdiction of  |
|--------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                 | Incorporation or |
| Name of Subsidiary                   | Organization     |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Paper Finance Holdings One LLC | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Paper Finance Holdings LLC     | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Paper Holdings LLC             | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Paper Finance Holdings Inc.    | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Paper LLC                      | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Paper Inc.                     | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Androscoggin LLC               | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Bucksport LLC                  | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Bucksport Leasing LLC                | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Maine Energy LLC               | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Quinnesec REP Holding Inc.     | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Quinnesec LLC                  | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Quinnesec REP LLC              | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Sartell LLC                    | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| Verso Fiber Farm LLC                 | Delaware         |
|                                 |             |
| nexTier Solutions Corporation        | California       |
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Bruce Kaiserman, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
    as Servicer, LaSalle Bank, National Association as Custodian and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Bruce Kaiserman
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Order entered November 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00802-CV

HOSSEIN S. NAMDARKHAN AND BARDIA NAMDARKHAN, Appellant

V.

GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY, P.C., MARK C. ENOCH, 

MARK C. ENOCH, PC, AND MATTHEW ENOCH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-00853

ORDER

Before the Court is the November 16, 2018 motion of appellant Bardia Namdarkhan for 

an extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to Monday, 

December 17, 2018.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
2010-0281.

#### [State ex rel.] Popov v. Bowling.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JX, concur.
[No. 58242-9-I.

Division One.

August 20, 2007.]

#### Sherron Associates Loan Fund V et al., *Respondents,*v. Galaxy Gaming Corporation et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-2-20977-1, Dean Scott Lum, J., entered May 10, 2006. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Schindler, A.C.J., and Baker, J.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-00-135]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Memorial Bridge, Across the 
Intracoastal Waterway, Mile 830.6, Volusia County, Daytona Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Memorial bridge across the Intracoastal Waterway, mile 830.6, Volusia 
County, Daytona Beach, Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge 
owner or operator to only open a single leaf, from January 8, 2001, to 
January 19, 2001. This temporary deviation is required to allow the 
bridge owner to safely complete repairs of the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from January 8, 2001, to January 19, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Memorial bridge across the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway at Volusia County, Daytona Beach, is a double 
leaf bridge with a vertical clearance of 21 feet above mean high water 
(MHW) measured at the fenders in the closed position with a horizontal 
clearance of 90 feet. On November 28, 2000, Sieg and Ambachtsheer, 
Inc., contractors representing the drawbridge owner, requested a 
deviation from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.5 which 
requires drawbridges to open promptly and fully when a request to open 
is given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary 
repairs to the drawbridge in a critical, time-sensitive manner.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.5 for the purpose of repair 
completion of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Memorial Bridge 
need only open one leaf from January 8, 2001 until January 19, 2001. 
The deviation is effective beginning January 8, 2001, to January 19, 
2001.

    Dated: December 21, 2000.
Greg E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-547 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
**Amendmentto Employment Agreement and Revocation of**

**StockRedemption Agreement, both dated December 26, 2003**

This Amendment (the "Amendment") to theEmployment Agreement  dated the 26th day of December, 2003 (the"Agreement") and the Stock Redemption Agreement  of the same date (the"Redemption Agreement") by and between Petroleum Development Corporation, aNevada Corporation (the "Company"), and Darwin L. Stump (the"Employee")  is made and entered into this 29th day ofDecember, 2005.

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire tomodify the terms and conditions of the Agreement and the Redemption Agreement asset forth in this Amendment;

NOW THEREFOR, in consideration of the premisesand mutual covenants and obligations set forth herein and for other good andvaluable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is herebyacknowledged and accepted, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound,agree as follows:

1.     Paragraph 5.e. of the Agreement requiring the Company to maintain lifeinsurance on the Employee and to repurchase stock or options at the discretionof the Employee's estate in the event of the death of the Employee is herebydeclared to be null and void in its entirety effective as of December 29, 2005.

2.     The Redemption Agreement is hereby declared null and void in itsentirety effective as of December 29, 2005.

3.     All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in forceas originally agreed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employeehave duly executed this Employment Agreement as of the date first abovewritten.

Petroleum Development Corporation                            Employee

By:       /s/ Steven R. Williams                                       /s/  Darwin L. Stump      

Steven R. Williams                                           Darwin L. Stump

            Chief Executive Officer
EX-35.1
(logo) CWCapital
       Asset Management


March 12, 2008

TRUSTEE:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045
Attn: Corporate Trust Services-CWCapital
Commercial Funding Corp., Commercial
Mortgage Trust Series 2007-C2

DEPOSITOR:
CWCapital Commercial Funding Corp.
One Charles River Place, 63 Kendrick Street
Needham, Massachusetts 02494
Attn: Craig Lieberman

RATING AGENCIES:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
7 World Trade Center
250 Greenwich Street, 25th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Attn: Tracey Ferguson

Copy:
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
One World Financial Center
New York, New York 10281
Attn: Anna Glick, Esq.

RE: COBALT 2007-C2 Officer's Certificate

Dear Representatives:

In accordance with the requirements detailed in Section 11.09 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital
Asset Management LLC ("CWCAM"), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is
providing this Officer's Certificate with respect to the following:

(A) a review of CWCAM's activities during the period 4/13/2007 - 12/31/2007 and
    of CWCAM's performance under this Agreement has been made under my
    supervision; and

(B) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all
    its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout
    the period noted above.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
CWCapital Asset Management LLC

/s/ David B. Iannarone
David B. Iannarone
Managing Director

701 13th Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005
www.cwcapital.com
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 7, 2009 | By:    | /s/ James      M. Kasim |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | James      M. Kasim          |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                      |   |                         |   |