alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mark Janczylik, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 114527.)

[6 NYS3d 886]

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Glen T. Bruening, J.), entered July 24, 2013. The judgment dismissed the claim after a trial on liability.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant, an inmate at a correctional facility, commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell while working in the mess hall. We reject claimant’s contention that the determination of the Court of Claims dismissing the claim following a bifurcated trial on liability is against the weight of the evidence *(see generally Farace v State of New York,*266 AD2d 870, 870 [1999]). “While it is well settled that this Court has the authority to independently consider the weight of the evidence on an appeal in a nonjury case, deference is still afforded to the findings of the Court of Claims where, as here, they are based largely on credibility determinations” *(Ring v State of New York,*8 AD3d 1057, 1057 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 608 [2004] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Claimant’s testimony concerning the condition of the floor in the dishwashing area of the mess hall where he fell varied from “getting a little wet,” “just wet” and “getting wet substantially for that early in the shift” upon his initial trip into that area. He also denied that water had accumulated on the floor at that point. Given that inconsistent *1486testimony, and claimant’s further testimony that he told a specific correction officer of the “very, very wet” condition of the floor after his first trip and prior to his second trip into the “slop sink room” approximately 15 minutes later, when he fell in an accumulation of water one eighth to one quarter of an inch deep, we conclude that claimant failed to meet his burden of establishing the existence of a hazardous condition inasmuch as “ ‘[t]he presence of a normal amount of water would not establish a want of reasonable care’ ” *(Seaman v State of New York,*45 AD3d 1126, 1127 [2007]).

Present — Scudder, P.J., Lindley, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         100,766
<SECURITIES>                                 3,072,336
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,247,896
<PP&E>                                       1,384,864
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,323,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,324,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          477,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,031
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,838,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,324,717
<SALES>                                        724,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               771,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               497,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                273,930
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            273,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   273,930
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lorenzo GARCIA MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40331

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 15, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*766Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lorenzo Garcia Mejia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Garcia Mejia has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2826

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

AN ACT

To provide for an investigation of the whereabouts of the

United States citizens and others who have been missing

from Cyprus since 1974.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND OTHERS MISS4 ING FROM CYPRUS.

5 (a) INVESTIGATION.—As soon as is practicable, the

6 President shall undertake, in cooperation with an appro7 priate international organization or nongovernmental or8 ganization, a thorough investigation of the whereabouts of

9 the United States citizens and others who have been miss10 ing from Cyprus since 1974. The investigation shall focus
2

•HR 2826 RFS

1 on the countries and communities which were combatants

2 in Cyprus in 1974, all of which currently receive United

3 States foreign assistance.

4 (b) RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION.—The Presi5 dent shall report the findings of this investigation to the

6 family of each of the United States citizens and others

7 who have been missing from Cyprus since 1974 and to

8 the Congress. Such reports shall include the whereabouts

9 of the missing.

10 (c) RETURNING THE MISSING.—The President, in

11 cooperation with an appropriate international organization

12 or nongovernmental organization, shall do everything pos13 sible to return to their families, as soon as is practicable,

14 the United States citizens and others who have been miss15 ing from Cyprus since 1974, including returning the re16 mains of those who are no longer alive.

Passed the House of Representatives August 1,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2826

AN ACT

To provide for an investigation of the whereabouts

have been missing from Cyprus since 1974.of the United States citizens and others who
#### Patricia B. MILLS, Administrator of the Estate of Brian Lee Mills, Decedent, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terrance D. SANDERS; Schneider National Carriers, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-1536.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 12, 2007.

Decided: March 9, 2007.

*206Jean M. McKeen, Tomlin & McKeen, Chester, Virginia, for Appellant. Eric S. Jensen, Monica A. Walker, Jensen *&*Associates, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Patricia B. Mills, as administrator of the estate of her son, Brian Mills, and on behalf of his estate, brought a wrongful death action under Virginia law against Appellees Terrance D. Sanders and Schneider National Carriers, Inc. Mills asserted Sanders’ negligent operation of his tractor-trailer caused it to veer from the highway and kill Brian, who was walking down the side of the road. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellees, and Mills appealed.

We review the granting of summary judgment de novo. *Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.,*863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988). We have reviewed the record, and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. *See Mills v. Sanders and Schneider Nat’l Carriers,*No. 4:05-cv-00059-JLK, 2006 WL 759011 (WD.Va. Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-288-012

Take notice that on February 22, 2001, Transwestern Pipeline Company (Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to become effective on February 23, 2001.

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5B.05

Original Sheet No. 5B.08

Transwestern states that the above sheets are being filed to describe a negotiated rate agreement with Richardson Products Company in accordance with the Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines.

Transwestern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commission.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protest must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-5358  Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Shaun Wayne WILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan E. OZMINT, Director SCDC; Bernard McKie; South Carolina Department of Corrections, DefendantsAppellees.

No. 06-7490.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2007.

Decided: March 26, 2007.

Shaun Wayne Wiles, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shaun Wayne Wiles appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Wiles v. Ozmint,*No. 0:05-cv-02111-CMC, 2006 WL 2260136*258(D.S.C. Aug. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2793 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2793

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                     For the relief of Kris Murty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES FOR KRIS MURTY.

    For the purpose of receiving reimbursement for relocation expenses 
under sections 5724 and 5724a of title 5, United States Code, Kris 
Murty of El Paso, Texas, an employee of the Department of the Army, is 
deemed to have been an employee transferred by the Department of the 
Army from one official station to another for permanent duty when he 
relocated from Houston, Texas, to Fort Bliss, Texas, in February 1985.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    No amount exceeding 10 percent of a payment made pursuant to 
section 1 may be paid to or received by any agent or attorney in 
consideration for services rendered in connection with the payment. Any 
person who violates the provisions of this section shall be guilty of 
an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided 
under title 18, United States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2793

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                     For the relief of Kris Murty.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001027342
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST I
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   283,505
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               283,505
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    275,000
<COMMON>                                         8,505
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,505
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,986
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,986
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23(ii)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 3, 2003 relating to the
financial statements of Pharmacia Corporation, which appears in Pharmacia
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002which is incorporated by reference in Pfizer Inc.'s Form 8-K filed on April 16,2003.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
November 18, 2003
```
2010-0637.

#### State v. Hall.

Morgan App. No. 09AP3. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

###### Farm Credit Administration Board 

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

# DATE AND TIME:

                         The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in                               ( print page 13317)                            McLean, Virginia, on March 8, 2001, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelly Mikel Williams, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444. 

# ADDRESS:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

#### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - February 21, 2001 (Open and Closed)

#### B. Reports 

    - FCS Building Association's Quarterly Report
    - Corporate Approvals

#### C. New Business 

#### 1. Regulation

    - Stock Issuance [ 12 CFR Parts 611  and  615 ] (Final) 

#### 1. Other 

    - Conversion of Central Oklahoma FLCA
    - Consolidation of AgCredit of California PCA/FLCA and Intermountain PCA/FLCA

Dated: February 20, 2001. 

Kelly Mikel Williams, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 01-5390 Filed 3-1-01; 11:51 am] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Steven E. Brown, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RBC Life Sciences, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 10, 2007         /s/ Steven E. Brown   Steven E. Brown   Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer