alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc.
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-2

  I, Robert Caruso, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, National
  Association (the "Servicer"), certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Banc of America Mortgage 2007-2 Trust (the "Exchange
    Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer
    and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in
    preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report
    under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
    Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its
    obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, dated April 27,
    2007, among Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, and the Servicer, in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
    of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 25, 2008


    /s/ Robert Caruso
    Signature

    Senior Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
2009-1901.

#### State v. Armacost.

Clermont App. No. CA2008-03-025, 2009-Ohio-554. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                          15,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,048
<INVENTORY>                                     89,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,568
<PP&E>                                         154,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,716
<BONDS>                                        135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   458,841
<SALES>                                        465,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               465,522
<CGS>                                          381,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  381,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   446
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,242
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Paul B. Murphy, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southwest
Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated: August 9, 2004 /s/ Paul B. Murphy, Jr.Paul B. Murphy, Jr.
Director and Chief Executive Officer
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 8

- 00 152

- C R



### ____________________

WILLIAM THAD GREENWOOD

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 75th District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. CR32772

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 1 4 , 201 8 , we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the

appellant explained why he needed more time for filing the record. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(b). The appellant di d not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not

entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being

no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).2 APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on August 28, 2018

Opinion Delivered August 29, 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,993,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,329,339
<PP&E>                                       4,207,026
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,566,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,826,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          230,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,595,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,826,712
<SALES>                                        342,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               476,182
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               331,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            145,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,086
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.93


</TABLE>
## '

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed January 10,2000

In The 

## Qtnurt nf Appeals 

## llift}J Dintrirt nf 

## wexun ut Dullun
No. 05-95-01317-CV

JAMES A. TAYLOR, Appellant 

# v. JEANNE R. JACOBS TAYLOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 94-18882-Y 

### OPINION PER CURIAM Before Justices Kinkeade, James, and FitzGerald Before this Court is appellant's June 25, 1999 motion to dismiss appeal with prejudice. The motion recites that the parties have reached a comprehensive settlement of all outstanding issues between them, and that appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal and seeks an order dismissing this appeal with prejudice and affirming the judgment of the trial court. To date, appellee has not filed a response. This case was abated on June 16, 1997, due to a federal bankruptcy case being filed involving appellant. Appellant's motion does not address reinstatement of the appeal. On both July 13, 1999, and September 17, 1999, the clerk sent letters to both parties requesting a motion to reinstate and advising them that no action could be taken on the motion to dismiss until the appeal was reinstated.Neither party responded to the first letter, and appellee's second letter came back marked as undeliverable no forwarding address. Appellant did not respond to the second letter. Since September 1999, the clerk has made repeated efforts to contact appellant. Recently, the clerk obtained a telephone number for appellant; however, to date appellant has failed to respond to the clerk's messages. The clerk also inquired into the status of the bankruptcy case with the bankruptcy court, and determined that the bankruptcy proceeding involving appellant has been closed. Accordingly, on its own motion, the Court REINSTATES this appeal. Moreover, appellant's June 25, 1999 motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. As requested, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

### See TEX. 

### R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). All other relief sought is DENIED.

Do Not Publish TEX. 

### R. APP. P. 47 PER CURIAM



### -2-

## C!tnurl nf 1\ppettln lliift}f ltintrirt nf**IDe~ttn** 

## ttl Bttllttn JUDGMENT JAMES 

### A. TAYLOR, Appellant No. 05-95-001317-CV 

## v. JEANNE R. JACOBS TAYLOR, Appellee Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court ofDallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 94- 18882-Y). Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices Kinkeade, James and FitzGerald.

Based on this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee JEANNE R. JACOBS TAYLOR recover her costs of this appeal from appellant JAMES 

### A. TAYLOR and from American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida as surety on appellant's cost bond.
Judgment entered January 10, 2000.

# ED~ JUSTICEQlourtnf2\pp!!alsllrtftlriltatrictnfW£XanatIIallanGeorgeLAllenSr.CourtsBuilding600CommerceStreet,SecondFloorDallas,Texas75202-4658.-..'l:'t.'•;-.,····'""·'·.'!.JEANNER0SACHSETX75048'·'·.....\;..,..,11•••1.1.1•••1.111.....1.1.1..1.11...1.1.1••1••••111
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-577

_____________________________

FREDDIE R. PATTERSON, III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Meredith Charbula, Judge.

September 18, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Freddie R. Patterson, III, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Richard A. KAMINSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, WFUBMC; Department of Pathology; A.J. Garvin, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman, Pathology, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1842.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 30, 2010.

Decided: Feb. 8, 2011.

Richard A. Kaminsky, Appellant Pro Se. William J. McMahon, IV, Kristine Marie Sims, Constangyi Brooks & Smith, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Kaminsky appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by *610the district court. *Kaminsky v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr., WFUBMC,*No. 1:08-cv-00882-JAB-PTS, 2010 WL 2583513 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2010). We deny as moot Kaminsky’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Luca D’Agnese certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Enersis Américas S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 29, 2016
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      January 4, 2010
            /s/
      David VillarrealDavid
      Villarreal
              Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
June 11, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 11th day of June, 2015.

10-13-00265-CV	IRONWOOD OIL & GAS LLC v. ELMER C. HONATH AND CHESTER G. NELSON - ON APPEAL FROM THE 13TH DISTRICT COURT OF NAVARRO COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. D12-21145-CV - SET ASIDE AND REMANDED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the agreement of the parties, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of the Court said agreement should be effectuated; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the court below be, and hereby is, set aside without regard to the merits and this cause is remanded to the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas, for entry of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.  It is further ordered that costs are taxed against the party incurring same in accordance with the parties’ agreement and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME, AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SCHEDULES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,808
<SECURITIES>                                    92,390
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,284
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,829
<PP&E>                                         128,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,264
<BONDS>                                         38,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,020
<SALES>                                        164,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,333
<CGS>                                          139,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>