alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                          Washington, D.C.  20549

                                   Form 8-K

                               CURRENT REPORT

      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                               Date of report:
                               October 24, 2001
                       Date of earliest event reported:
                               October 17, 2001




                                 PFIZER INC.
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     Delaware                    1-3619                13-5315170
    (State or other         (Commission File        (I.R.S. Employer
     jurisdiction of             Number)           Identification No.)
     incorporation)


                           235 East 42nd Street
                             New York, New York                 10017
                  (Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)


         Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
                             (212) 573-2323




       (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Item 5.      Other Events.

Attached and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 99 is a copy of a
press release of Pfizer Inc. dated October 17, 2001, reporting Pfizer's
financial results for the third quarter 2001.

Item 7(c).   Exhibits.

Exhibit   Description
99        Press release of Pfizer Inc. dated October 17, 2001, reporting
Pfizer's financial results for the third quarter and first nine months of
2001.



Signature
Under the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the authorized
undersigned.

                           PFIZER INC.
                           ----------------------------
                                 (Registrant)

Date  October 24, 2001             /s/ Margaret M. Foran
                                 -----------------------------
                           Name:  Margaret M. Foran
                           Title: Vice President-Corporate Governance

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 99 - Press release of Pfizer Inc. dated October 17, 2001, reporting
Pfizer's financial results for the third quarter of 2001.
#### The State ex rel. Lear Operations Corporation, Appellee, *v.*Crispen, Appellant, et al.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Lear Operations Corp. v. Crispen,*124 Ohio St.3d 444, 2010-Ohio-686.]

(No. 2008-2326

Submitted February 16, 2010

Decided March 4, 2010.)

Constance A. Snyder, for appellee Lear Operations Corporation.

Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer and Martha Joyce Wilson, for appellant.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Sandra E. Pinkerton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP95-408-039]

                    Take notice that on February 20, 2001, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation Columbia) filed a refund report in the above referenced docket, pursuant to                           ( print page 13517)                        Section 154.501(e) of the Federal Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations.                

Columbia states that it made a filing on December 15, 2000, pursuant to a settlement approved by the Commission in Docket no. RP95-408 (79 FERC ¶61,044), to share gains from the sale of certain gathering and products extraction facilities. The Commission approved the filing on January 31, 2001. Columbia states that the instant filing shows that Columbia made the refund, including interest through the date of refund, which was January 22, 2001.

Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all affected customers and state commissions.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before March 9, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-5354  Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1


        Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18
           U.S.C. Section 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Michael C. Culver, as Chief Executive Officer of First Aviation Services Inc.
(the  "Company"),  certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350 (as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  that  to my
knowledge:

(1)      the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
         period  ended  July  31,  2005  (the  "Report"),  filed  with  the U.S.
         Securities   and  Exchange   Commission,   fully   complies   with  the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  September 14, 2005


                                                     /S/ MICHAEL C. CULVER
                                                    -------------------------
                                                     Michael C. Culver
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1







SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Rim Semiconductor Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that
      to such officer's knowledge:




(1)  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended July 31,
      2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




This
      certification is made solely for the purposes of U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
      for any other purpose.




September
      14, 2006




/S/ BRAD
                KETCHBRAD
                KETCH
              PRESIDENT
                AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING
                OFFICER)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6192

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROGER LEE LOCKAMY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:14-cr-00096-WO-1)

Submitted: June 9, 2023 Decided: July 13, 2023

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Lee Lockamy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6192 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Lockamy appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and for appointment of counsel. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order. United States v. Lockamy, No. 1:14-cr-00096-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 

27, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6192 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/13/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2798 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2798

To require a proposal for a pay table for commissioned officers of the 
 Armed Forces using steps in grade based on time in grade rather than 
                            time in service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2018

  Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a proposal for a pay table for commissioned officers of the 
 Armed Forces using steps in grade based on time in grade rather than 
                            time in service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Officer Personnel Pay Reform 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROPOSAL FOR PAY TABLE FOR COMMISSIONED 
              OFFICERS OF THE ARMED FORCES USING STEPS IN GRADE BASED 
              ON TIME IN GRADE RATHER THAN TIME IN SERVICE.

    (a) Proposal Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report setting forth a proposal for 
a pay table for commissioned officers of the Armed Forces that uses 
steps in grade for each pay grade based on time of service within such 
pay grade rather than on time of service in the Armed Forces as a 
whole.
    (b) Comptroller General Assessment.--Not later than March 1, 2019, 
the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment 
by the Comptroller General of the proposed pay table required pursuant 
to subsection (a), including an assessment of the effects of using the 
proposed pay table, rather than the current pay table for commissioned 
officers of the Armed Forces, on recruitment and retention of 
commissioned officers of the Armed Forces as a whole and on recruitment 
and retention of commissioned officers of the Armed Forces with 
particular sets of skills (including cyber and other technical skills).
    (c) Congressional Defense Committees Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``congressional defense committees'' has the meaning given that 
term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
lasalle logo
              
              
              LaSalle
      Bank N.A.
                135 South
      LaSalle Street
                Suite
      1625
                Chicago,
      IL  60603
                
                Global Securities
      and Trust Services








Annual
Statement of Compliance





VIA:
EMAIL





Structured
Asset Securities Corporation II,


745
Seventh Avenue


New York,
New York 10019


Attention:
David Nass -- LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C2





Wachovia
Bank, National Association


8739
Research Drive, URP4


Charlotte,
North Carolina 28262-1075


Attention:
LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C2





Re:
            LB-UBS
      Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C2 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
      Certificates, Series 2007-C2





Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 11, 2007 (the
“Agreement”), among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II, as Depositor,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, Inc., as
Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as
Trustee.





I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee hereby certify that:





1.
            
            A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made
      under my supervision; and





2.
            
            To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled
      all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout such year.








Date:
3/14/08





LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
Barbara L. Marik


Barbara
L. Marik


Senior
Vice President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Roberto VARGAS-GARZON, also known as Johnny Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-51085

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Julio Roberto Vargas-Garzon raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. *382224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *382published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit
4.15
 ADDENDUM AGREEMENT NO. 1
 Addendum Agreement
 TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
 BETWEEN CARDIFF MARINE INC.
OF MONROVIA, LIBERIA, LAWFULLY REPRESENTED (HEREINAFTER
CARDIFF)
 AND
 OCEAN BLUE SPIRIT OWNERS INC. (M/T TAMARA)
OCEANFAITH OWNERS INC. (M/T TIGANI)
HEREINAFTER COLLECTIVELY THE OWNERS
  th
 th
      1




---



##### 



th st
  2




---



##### 



/s/ Michael GregosON
BEHALF OF OCEAN BLUE SPIRIT OWNERS INC.By: Michael GregosTitle: COO
 /s/ Michael GregosON
BEHALF OF OCEANFAITH OWNERS INC.By: Michael GregosTitle: COO
 /s/ Charalampos AlivizatosON BEHALF OF CARDIFF MARINE INC.By: Charalampos AlivizatosTitle: Legal Representative
 3
Exhibit 32.1








Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Ian C. Read, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pfizer Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pfizer Inc.








/s/ IAN C. READIan C. ReadChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2013








This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
[No. 25496-8-III.

Division Three.

August 21, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ardis Lavelle Wilson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 06-1-00524-5, Neal Q. Rielly, J., entered August 30, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kulik, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Stephens, J.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derold
L. Kelley, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge,:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:           March
12, 2010





/s/Derold
L.
Kelley


Derold L.
Kelley


President,
Chief Executive Officer,


Chief
Financial Officer and Director
Order entered October 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00127-CR

CLARENCE DANNEL DUNNINGTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-80895-2013

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q/A of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Joseph K. Jachinowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April 16, 2004



/s/ JOSEPH K. JACHINOWSKIJoseph K. JachinowskiChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2748

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business

AN ACT

To amend the Small Business Development Center Program,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2748 RFS

1 That section 21(c)(7) of the Small Business Act (15

2 U.S.C. 648) is amended by striking ‘‘system which will’’

3 and by inserting in lieu thereof the following: ‘‘system.

4 Subject to amounts approved in advance in appropriations

5 Acts, the Administration may make grants or enter coop6 erative agreements with one or more centers to carry out

7 the provisions of this paragraph. Said grants or coopera8 tive agreements shall be awarded for periods of no more

9 than five years duration. The matching funds provisions

10 of subsection (a) shall not be applicable to grants to coop11 erative agreements under this paragraph. The system

12 shall’’.

13 (b) Section 25(i) of the Small Business Act (15

14 U.S.C. 652) is amended by striking ‘‘$8,000,000 for fiscal

15 year 1993’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$2,000,000

16 for each of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996’’.

17 (c) Section 223 of the Small Business Credit and

18 Business Opportunity Enhancement Act of 1992 (106

19 Stat. 986) is amended by striking the last sentence of sub20 section (b).

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.