alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001026488
<NAME>                        MICRO-HYDRO POWER, INC.                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,728
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,731)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)
        


</TABLE>
ELECTRONIC RECORD

IIS5-/5'

COA # 02-14-00405-CR OFFENSE: 43.26

Mark Massimo Cardarelli v. The

STYLE: state of Texas COUNTY: Parker

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 43rd District Court

DATE:08/25/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: CR13-0129

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Mark Massimo Cardarelli v. The

STYLE: State of Texas CCA#: \\%s-ts

APPELI^MT^S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

KcFU£>^h

DATE:

JUDGE:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00593
- CV

A. B. a/k/a A. L. B. a/k/a A. B. a/k/a M. S., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 18
- 005046, THE HONO RABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant A. B. a/k/a A. L. B. a/k/a A. B. a/k/a M. S. filed her notice of appeal on August 27, 2019 . The appellate record was complete September 10, 2019 , making appellant ’ s br ie f due September 30, 2019

. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

T he rules of judicial administration ac celerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days
fo r court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore, we order counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than Octo ber 22, 2019

. If the brief is not filed by that date, co unsel may be r equi red to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on October 8, 2019

.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
2009-1365.

#### State v. Franklin.

Summit App. No. 22771.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

          - 7 CFR Part 301

      ( print page 46509)    

### CFR Correction

In Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 300 to 399, revised as of January 1, 2001, appearing on page 34 and 35, § 301.50-3(d) is removed. The text was removed by an amendment published at 64 FR 387, January 5, 1999. 

[FR Doc.01-55522 Filed 9-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA I947A .4610 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TH E STATE OF NEVADA

OSCAR CABADA, AN INDIVIDUAL;AND JOSE ALBERTO CABADAOROZCO, AN INDIVIDUAL, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TARA D. CLARK NEWBERRY, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and PETER RICHARDSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest. No. 83230



# FILED AUG 1 1 2021
ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT S BY DEPUTY

C> C1 C t iVI RK

ORDER DENYING PETITION .FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order partially granting a motion to strike a rebuttal expert.

This court has original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this court's sole discretion. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4: D.R. Horton, inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 4-68, 474-75. 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioners bear the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted, and such relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist, Court, 120 Nev, 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 84.0, 841., 844 (2004.). An appeal is generally an adequate remedy precluding writ relief. Id. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Even when an appeal is not immediately available because the challenged order is interlocutory in

### nature, the fact that the order may ultimately be challenged on appeal frorn

a final judgment generally precludes writ relief. Id. at 225, 88 P.3d at 841. Further, 'Wins court has held that the decision to adrnit or exclude expert opinion testimony is discretionary and is not typically subject to review on a petition for a writ of mandamus." Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court. 127 Nev. 518, 524, 262 P.3d 360, 364 (2011). Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted because petitioners have not demonstrated that an appeal from a final judgment below would not be a plain, speedy, and adequate legal remedy. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

" C :24.13"142.31.1

r flim7J

. Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Hon. Tara D. Clark Newberry, District Judge Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell. :13 1414C/Las Vegas Drummond Law Firm Law Office of Lee J. Grant II Eighth District Court Clerk

2

•
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Social and Political Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, and amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Social and Political Sciences (#1761).
    Date/Time: March 23, 2001; 8 a.m. to 6 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
970; Arlington, VA.
    Contact Person: Dr. Frank Scioli and Dr. James Granato, Program 
Directors for Political Science, National Science Foundation. 
Telephone: (703) 292-8762.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the political science proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning support for research proposals submitted to the NSF for 
financial support.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These maters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 1, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-5466 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (01-034)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Prospective Patent License. 

# SUMMARY:

NASA hereby gives notice that Modern Machine & Tool Co. Inc., of Newport News, VA 23606-2587, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the invention disclosed in NASA Case No. LAR 16020-1 entitled “Single Vector Force Balance Calibration System,” which is assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Ms. Helen M. Galus, Patent Attorney, Langley Research Center. 

# DATES:

Responses to this notice must be received by May 7, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen M. Galus, Patent Attorney, Langley Research Center, Mail Stop 212, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; telephone 757-864-3227. 

Dated: March 1, 2001. 

Edward A. Frankle, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 01-5553 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2896 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2896

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To require disclosure by lobbyists of convictions for bribery, 
    extortion, embezzlement, illegal kickbacks, tax evasion, fraud, 
   conflicts of interest, making false statements, perjury, or money 
                              laundering.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice Against Corruption on K 
Street Act of 2018'' or the ``JACK Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF CORRUPT MALPRACTICE BY LOBBYISTS.

    (a) Registration.--Section 4(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1603(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
            ``(7) for any listed lobbyist who was convicted in a 
        Federal or State court of an offense involving bribery, 
        extortion, embezzlement, an illegal kickback, tax evasion, 
        fraud, a conflict of interest, making a false statement, 
        perjury, or money laundering, the date of the conviction and a 
        description of the offense.''.
    (b) Quarterly Reports.--Section 5(b) of the Lobbying Disclosure Act 
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1604(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) for any listed lobbyist who was convicted in a 
        Federal or State court of an offense involving bribery, 
        extortion, embezzlement, an illegal kickback, tax evasion, 
        fraud, a conflict of interest, making a false statement, 
        perjury, or money laundering, the date of the conviction and a 
        description of the offense.''.

            Passed the Senate August 23, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2896

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To require disclosure by lobbyists of convictions for bribery, 
    extortion, embezzlement, illegal kickbacks, tax evasion, fraud, 
   conflicts of interest, making false statements, perjury, or money 
                              laundering.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN BETZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 455 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### DUKE *et al. v.*STORY *et al.,*executors.

When a defendant against whom a verdict has been rendered makes a motion for a new trial, he can not properly, while the same is still pending and undisposed of, .bring to this court for review any ruling, order, or decision made by the judge during the progress of the case, or the judgment entered upon the verdict.

Submitted Marcia 2,

Decided March 27, 1901.

Practice in the Supreme Court.

*Pike & Ayers*and *Strickland & Green,*for plaintiffs in error.

*C. B. Henry, H. H. Perry,*and *Bussell & Armistead,*contra.

*113Lumpkin, P. J.

An action was brought by Story and others against M. N. Duke, to which M. J. Duke Was subsequently made a party defendant. A trial was had, a verdict for the plaintiffs was returned, and a judgment was entered thereon. The Dukes sued out a bill of exceptions alleging error in the rendition of this judgment. It appears, however, that they also filed a motion for a new trial, which was still pending when the bill of exceptions was certified. The case is therefore prematurely here, and the writ of error must be dismissed. *Mitchell*v. *Tomlin,*64 *Ga.*368; *Williams*v. *Jones,*69 *Ga.*277, s. c. Id. 757: *McLendon v. W. & A. R. Co.,*85 *Ga.*129. *Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
' 

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed January 10,2000 

In The 

Qtnurt nf Appeals 

llift}J Dintrirt nf wexun ut Dullun 

No. 05-95-01317-CV 

JAMES A. TAYLOR, Appellant 

v. 

JEANNE R. JACOBS TAYLOR, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 94-18882-Y 

OPINION PER CURIAM 

Before Justices Kinkeade, James, and FitzGerald 

Before this Court is appellant's June 25, 1999 motion to dismiss appeal with prejudice. The 

motion recites that the parties have reached a comprehensive settlement of all outstanding issues 

between them, and that appellant no longer desires to prosecute this appeal and seeks an order 

dismissing this appeal with prejudice and affirming the judgment of the trial court. To date, appellee 

has not filed a response. 

This case was abated on June 16, 1997, due to a federal bankruptcy case being filed involving 

appellant. Appellant's motion does not address reinstatement of the appeal. On both July 13, 1999, 

and September 17, 1999, the clerk sent letters to both parties requesting a motion to reinstate and 

advising them that no action could be taken on the motion to dismiss until the appeal was reinstated. 
Neither party responded to the first letter, and appellee's second letter came back marked as 

undeliverable no forwarding address. Appellant did not respond to the second letter. 

Since September 1999, the clerk has made repeated efforts to contact appellant. Recently, the 

clerk obtained a telephone number for appellant; however, to date appellant has failed to respond to 

the clerk's messages. The clerk also inquired into the status of the bankruptcy case with the 

bankruptcy court, and determined that the bankruptcy proceeding involving appellant has been closed. 

Accordingly, on its own motion, the Court REINSTATES this appeal. 

Moreover, appellant's June 25, 1999 motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED 

in part. As requested, this appeal is DISMISSED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). All other relief 

sought is DENIED. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

PER CURIAM 

-2-
C!tnurl nf 1\ppettln 

lliift}f ltintrirt nf IDe~ttn ttl Bttllttn 

JUDGMENT 

JAMES A. TAYLOR, Appellant 

No. 05-95-001317-CV v. 

JEANNE R. JACOBS TAYLOR, Appellee 

Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court 

ofDallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 94-

18882-Y). 

Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices 

Kinkeade, James and FitzGerald. 

Based on this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED 

that appellee JEANNE R. JACOBS TAYLOR recover her costs of this appeal from appellant 

JAMES A. TAYLOR and from American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida as surety on 

appellant's cost bond. 

Judgment entered January 10, 2000. 

ED~ JUSTICE 
!als 

an at II allan 

ts Building 

cond Floor 

-4658 

.-

.. 

'l:'t.'•; -. 

,··· ·' ""· 

'·.'!. 

JEANNE R 0 

SACHSE TX 75048 

' 

·'· ..... 

\; 

.. ,.., 

11 ••• 1.1.1 ••• 1. 111 ..... 1.1.1 .. 1.11 ... 1.1.1 •• 1 •••• 111
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-06-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-06-1997
<CASH>                                       5,805,975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,959,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,105,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,092,101
<PP&E>                                       1,486,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                 757,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,848,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,101,922
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,684
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,693,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,848,516
<SALES>                                     10,630,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,630,472
<CGS>                                        6,805,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,805,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               833,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             395,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,003,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,003,210)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,003,210)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

June 7, 2024 CR-2022-1327 Chad Richardson v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court: CC-19- 104 ) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on June 7, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.30
 PROMISSORY NOTE
   
 
 
 
  LOAN AGREEMENT.
 LINE OF CREDIT. 30-Day Payout.
  USE OF PROCEEDS.




---



##### 



INTEREST RATE.
 DEFAULT RATE.
 INTEREST AND FEE(S) COMPUTATION (ACTUAL/360).
 REPAYMENT TERMS.
 APPLICATION OF PAYMENTS.
  DEFINITIONS. Loan Documents. Obligations. Certain Other Terms.
 LATE CHARGE.
  Page 2




---



##### 



ATTORNEYS FEES AND OTHER COLLECTION COSTS.
 USURY.
 DEFAULT. Nonpayment; Nonperformance. False Warranty. Cross Default. Cessation; Bankruptcy. Material Capital Structure or Business
Alteration. Material Adverse Change.
 REMEDIES UPON DEFAULT. Bank Lien. Acceleration Upon
Default. Cumulative.
  Page 3




---



##### 



FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION.
 WAIVERS AND AMENDMENTS.
  MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. Assignment. Applicable Law; Conflict Between Documents. Borrowers Accounts. Swap Agreements. Jurisdiction. Severability. Payments. Notices.
  Page 4




---



##### 



Plural;
Captions. Advances. Posting of Payments. Joint and Several Obligations. Fees and Taxes. LIMITATION ON LIABILITY; WAIVER OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES. Patriot Act Notice. Final Agreement.
 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. .
  Page 5




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 eResearch Technology, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Steven M. Eisenstein
    
    (SEAL)Steven M. Eisenstein, Vice President and ControllereRT Investment CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Steven M. Eisenstein
    
    (SEAL)Steven M. Eisenstein, Vice PresidenteRT Tech CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Steven M. Eisenstein
    
    (SEAL)Steven M. Eisenstein, Vice President
 
  Page 6
2009-2152.

#### State ex rel. Texas E. Transm., L.P. v. Ohio Reclamation Comm.

In Prohibition. On motion of American Energy Corporation for leave to intervene as respondent, motions to dismiss of respondent and intervening respondent, and motion for admission pro hac vice of David R. Overstreet and Craig P. Wilson by Frank L. Merrill. Motion for admission pro hac vice granted. Motion for leave to intervene granted. Motions to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
2009-1997.

#### State v. Hodge.

Hamilton App. No. C-080968.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.