alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A cep
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malik Abdhul NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7008.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 26, 2011.

*661Ray Coit Yarborough, Jr., Law Office of Ray Coit Yarborough, Jr., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malik Abdhul Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion and reducing his sentence from sixty-four to fifty months’ imprisonment. Nelson’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning whether we can review a district court’s order granting a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion, but concluding that 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2006) provides no basis for the appeal. Nelson was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. The Government declined to file a brief.

We lack the authority to review a district court’s decision concerning Rule 35(b) motions unless the ultimate sentence was imposed in violation of the law. *United States v. Hartwell,*448 F.3d 707, 712-14 (4th Cir.2006); *United States v. Pridgen,*64 F.3d 147, 148-50 (4th Cir.1995); *see*18 U.S.C. § 3742. We conclude that the sentence Nelson received was not imposed in violation of the law, and thus we lack the authority to review the district court’s order.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This court requires that counsel inform Nelson, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Nelson requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Nelson. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Nacel Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Schaftlein, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Mark SchaftleinMark SchaftleinChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial OfficerJuly 14, 2011
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL JANGL,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00253-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2

of Hays County, Texas 

(TC# 19-1183CR)

O R D E R

The Appellant’s brief in the above styled and numbered cause was due December 6, 

2019. On December 18, 2019, Appellant filed a response indicating that he filed a brief with the 

Hays County clerk and has no intention on filing an additional brief with this Court. Appellant is 

required to file a brief with the appellate court in compliance with Rule 38.1 Tex.R.App.P.

It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether 

Appellant wishes to continue the appeal. Further, the trial court shall forward its findings to the 

County Clerk of Hays County, Texas, on or before February 11, 2020. The County Clerk shall 

prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and forward the same 

to this Court on or before February 21, 2020. Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be 

prepared, certified and filed with this Court on or before February 21, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of January, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 32(b)
 CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Herman F. Dick, Jr.Herman F. Dick, Jr.Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief 
Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2008
EXHIBIT 35.1

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QH4 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
April 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing Agreement,  dated
as of December 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company,  Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as master servicer,  and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,  as trustee, does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Managing Director
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2001 / Presidential Documents 12991

Proclamation 7409 of February 26, 2001

Irish-American Heritage Month, 2001

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Beginning from the earliest years of settlement, millions of Ireland’s people

have emigrated to America’s shores. This immigration reached a particular

peak during the terrible years of the Great Famine more than 150 years

ago. Irish immigrants, from professionals to laborers, made an enormous

contribution to the building of our Nation.

The Irish who came to America endured many hardships but have prevailed

to play vital roles in every chapter of our country’s history. Nine of the

signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Irish origin, and 19

Presidents of the United States have proudly claimed Irish heritage—including George Washington, Andrew Jackson, John F. Kennedy, and Ronald

Reagan. Irish Americans have served with distinction in every war this

Nation has fought, from Revolutionaries John Barry and Stephen Moylan

to General Douglas MacArthur. Other influential and renowned figures of

Irish descent include pioneers Buffalo Bill Cody, Daniel Boone, and Davy

Crockett; authors Flannery O’Connor, Eugene O’Neill, and John O’Hara; Civil

War photographer Matthew Brady; and entertainers Jackie Gleason, Gene

Kelly, and John Wayne. These distinguished Americans represent only a

small sampling of the men and women whose legacy has forever changed

our national identity and who trace their ancestry to Ireland’s green shores.

Today, the more than 44 million Americans who claim Irish heritage look

back with pride on the achievements and contributions of their forebears.

Irish Americans have distinguished themselves in every sector of American

life. We are all enriched, strengthened, and blessed by their service to

our country.

12992 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2001 / Presidential Documents

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2001 as IrishAmerican Heritage Month. I call upon all the people of the United States

to observe this month with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth

day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand one, and of the

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twentyfifth.

Billing code 3195

Filed 2

[FR Doc. 01

–28–01; 8:45 am]

–5190

–01–P

W
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5033]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Region IX Hawaii District Advisory Council; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, Region IX District Advisory 
Council, located in the geographical area of Honolulu, Hawaii, will 
hold a public meeting at 10:00 a.m., on Thursday, March 22, 2001, at 
the Business Information and Counseling Center, 1111 Bishop Street, 
Suite 204, Training Center, Honolulu, HI 96813; to discuss such matters 
as may be presented by members, staff of the Small Business 
Administration or others present. For further information write or call 
Mr. Andrew K. Poepoe, District Director, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 2-235, Honolulu, Hawaii 
96850; telephone (808) 541-2965.

Nancyellen Gentile,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-5033 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
```
EXHIBIT 33.1





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING CRITERIA


FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES





Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), as a party participating in the servicing function under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, hereby reports on its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as follows:





(1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it. The servicing criteria specified in the following paragraphs of paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not applicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs with respect to asset-backed securities transactions taken as a whole involving the Servicer and that are backed by the same asset type backing the Senior Secured Transition Bonds, Series A: (1)(ii) (outsourcing), (1)(iii) (back-up servicing), (1)(iv) (fidelity bond), 2(iii) (advances or guarantees), (2)(vi) (unissued checks), (4)(iii) (additions, removals or substitutions), (4)(v) (records regarding pool assets), (4)(ix) (adjustments to interest rates), (4)(x) (funds held in trust for an obligor), (4)(xi) (payments on behalf of obligors), (4)(xii) (late payment penalties), (4)(xiii) (obligor disbursements), and (4)(xv) (external credit enhancement);





(2) The Servicer used the criteria in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;





(3) The Servicer has determined that it is in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ending December 31, 2017, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K; and





(4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent  registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is the period covered by this report on Form 10-K.








Date:  March 22, 2018





By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal


Name:  Steven C. McNeal


Title:   Vice President and Treasurer
2009-1334.

#### State v. Powers.

Warren App. No. CA2008-06-071, 2009-Ohio-2625.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13950-13951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


National Satellite Land Remote Sensing Data Archive Advisory 
Committee; Committee Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, the National Satellite Land 
Remote Sensing Data Archive (NSLRSDA) Advisory Committee will meet at 
the

[[Page 13951]]

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation Systems 
(EROS) Data Center (EDC) near Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The Committee, 
comprised of 15 members from academia, industry, government, 
information science, natural science, social science, and policy/law, 
will provide the USGS, EDC management with advice and consultation on 
defining and accomplishing the NSLRSDA's archiving and access goals to 
carry out the requirements of the Land Remote Sensing Policy Act; on 
priorities of the NSLRSDA's tasks; and, on issues of archiving, data 
management, science, policy, and public-private partnerships.
    Topics to be reviewed and discussed by the Committee include 
determining the content of and upgrading the basic data set as 
identified by the Congress; metada content and accessibility; product 
characteristics, availability, and delivery; and, archiving, data 
access, and distribution policies.

DATES: March 28, 2001 commencing at 8:30 a.m. and adjourning at 12 noon 
on March 30, 2001.

CONTACT: Mr. Thomas M. Holm, Chief, Data Services Branch, U.S. 
Geological Survey, EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57198 
at (605) 594-6142 or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89e1e6e5e4c9fcfaeefaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e880878485a89d9b8f9bc68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the National Satellite Land 
Remote Sensing Data Archive Advisory Committee are open to the public. 
The required lead time for notification of this meeting could not be 
met due to the fact that we were awaiting final Congressional approval 
of reestablishing the Committee. Previous Committee meeting minutes are 
available for public review at http://edc.usgs.gov/programs/nslrsda/advcomm.html.

Barbara Ryan,
Associate Director for Geography.
[FR Doc. 01-5659 Filed 3-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 22, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-61110

Summary Calendar

ANASTASIA NKAMINE SIEWE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A96 087 137

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anastasia Nkamine Siewe seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen

immigration proceedings. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, we

affirm for the following reasons:

1. Pursuant to immigration regulations, a filing fee is

required in connection with the filing of a motion to

reopen, unless the motion to reopen “is based

exclusively on an application for relief [such as

asylum] that does not require a fee.” 8 C.F.R. §
No. 05-61110

-2-

1003.24(b)(2)(i)(2005). Siewe’s motion to reopen is not

based exclusively on an asylum application. Siewe’s

original application for asylum was withdrawn and the

proceeding below addressed only the merits of her I-130

request for adjustment of status. 

Siewe’s motion to reopen was based on a claim of

ineffective assistance of counsel. While that claim

was related to advice Siewe received regarding asylum,

Siewe’s motion to reopen did not address her

eligibility for asylum, and she did not attach an

asylum application to the motion. See id. at

§ 1003.23(b)(3) (a motion to reopen for the purpose of

acting on an application for relief must be accompanied

by the application and all supporting documents).

2. Because the basis of Siewe’s motion to reopen did not

fall within the fee exemptions set out in § 1003.8, we

agree with the BIA’s determination that a filing fee

was required.

3. Because we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its

discretion in denying the motion to reopen for lack of

a filing fee, we do not address Siewe’s argument that

her motion met the requirements of In re Lozada, 19 I &

N Dec. 637 (BIA 1988).

The petition for review is DENIED.
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 Posted County Price Rates
 Section TopicsPrice Support HomeAlternative Delivery SystemsCommodity Loan RatesCommodity Loans Non Recourse Loans Cotton ProgramHoney ProgramPeanut ProgramPulse Crops ProgramRice ProgramWool and Mohair ProgramRecourse LoansFacility Loans Farm StorageSugar StorageInitiativesLoan Deficiency PaymentsMarket Loss Assistance ProgramsPrice Support ReportsRTCPLDP RatesPCP RatesArchived LDP/PCP Rates
 Search Filters State
   County
   Crop Year
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<!--XBRL document created with Dragon Tag (TM) XBRL Enabler by Rivet Software version 1.5.1.91-->
<!--Based on XBRL 2.1-->
<!--Created on: 11/14/2007 5:42:41 PM-->
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pfe2="http://www.pfizer.com2" targetNamespace="http://www.pfizer.com2" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
  <element id="pfe2_reportScenario" name="reportScenario" type="string" />
  <element id="pfe2_unaudited" name="unaudited" type="string" />
  <element id="pfe2_audited" name="audited" type="string" />
</schema>
</XBRL>
EX-12
                              RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          EXHIBIT 12


                                                             MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST I
                                                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING I, L.P.
                                                               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                    (dollars in thousands)


                                             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                   MARCH 30, 2001                           MARCH 31, 2000
                                         ----------------------------------       ----------------------------------
                                          MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH         MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH
                                            PREFERRED          PREFERRED             PREFERRED          PREFERRED
                                         CAPITAL TRUST I    FUNDING I, L.P.       CAPITAL TRUST I    FUNDING I, L.P.
                                         ---------------    ---------------       ---------------    ---------------
<S>                                        <C>                <C>                   <C>                <C>
Earnings                                    $  5,493           $  6,449              $  5,493           $  6,441
                                            ========           ========              ========           ========



Fixed charges                               $      -           $      -              $      -           $     -

Preferred securities distribution
  requirements                                 5,328              5,493                 5,328              5,493
                                            --------           --------              --------           --------

Total combined fixed charges and
  preferred securities distributions        $  5,328           $  5,493              $  5,328           $  5,493
                                            ========           ========              ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
  fixed charges and preferred
  securities distributions                      1.03               1.17                  1.03               1.17




</TABLE>