alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.4**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Javier Galán A., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 20-F/A of Enersis Américas S.A.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: September 6, 2016
Wachovia
Bank, National Association
 8739
Research Drive, URP4
 Charlotte,
NC 28288-1075







WACHOVIA
SECURITIES




1123
SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE





Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April
11, 2007, by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation, II, as
Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR
Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer, LaSalle Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2007-C2 (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.
 
 Pursuant
to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan, and Marilyn Addison, Managing
Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of Compliance Third
Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:
  1.
              A
      review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
      April 11, 2007 through December 31, 2007 and of its performance under the
      Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision;
      and
  2.
              To the
      best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
      respects throughout the period April 11, 2007 through December 31,
      2007.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
10th
day of March 2008.






/s/
      Timothy S. Ryan
              
              /s/
      Marilyn AddisonTimothy
      S. Ryan, Managing Director
              
              Marilyn
      Addison, DirectorWachovia
      Bank National Association
              
              Wachovia
      Bank National Association
   O:\Shared/SP/Income/Compliance
3rdParty Oversight/Annual Certification/Certification/2007/LBUBS
2007-C2
H. R. 2559

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 601 East 12th Street in Kansas City,

Missouri, as the ‘‘Richard Bolling Federal Building’’ and the United States Courthouse located at Ninth and Locust Streets, in Kansas City, Missouri, as the

‘‘Charles Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 601 East 12th Street in Kansas

City, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Richard

Bolling Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Richard

Bolling Federal Building’’.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

The United States Courthouse located at Ninth and Locust

Streets in Kansas City, Missouri, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Charles Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 4. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the courthouse referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles

Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 19, 2010*

[Cite as *01/19/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-100.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

#### In re Starks.

On December 31, 2008, this court found Verdell Starks to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Starks was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On January 13, 2010, Starks submitted a motion for leave to file an appeal/memorandum in support of jurisdiction. Upon review of the proffered filing the court finds it without merit. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court that Starks is denied leave to file an appeal.
#### Jesse BREWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew D. JONES, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-4442-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 28, 2007.

*70Jesse Brewer, pro se, Attica, NY, for Appellant.

Daniel J. Chepaitis, Assistant Solicitor General (Michael S. Belohlavek, on the brief), for Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, Hon. B.D. PARKER and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Plaintiff-appellant Jesse Brewer, *pro se,*appeals from a judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of defendant-appellee Andrew Jones in this suit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case and the issues on appeal.

Brewer argues on appeal that the district court erred under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404 in admitting evidence of a previous lawsuit filed by Brewer. Specifically, Brewer argues that the challenged evidence improperly suggested that Brewer had litigious tendencies. We review a district court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion. *See Arlio v. Lively,*474 F.3d 46, 51 (2d Cir.2007). A trial judge’s Rule 403 rulings are entitled to “considerable deference.” *Costantino v. Herzog,*203 F.3d 164, 173 (2d Cir.2000). “Moreover, the improper admission of evidence is grounds for reversal only where it affects ‘a substantial right’ of one of the parties.” *Id.*at 174 (quoting Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)).

We see nothing in the record to suggest that the challenged evidence was admitted for an improper purpose or was unduly prejudicial. On the contrary, because the evidence was relevant to show a possible cause of Brewer’s injury unrelated to the acts of the defendant, the district court *71correctly concluded that the probative value of the evidence outweighed any possibility of prejudice. Furthermore, the record reflects that the defense scrupulously confined its use of the challenged evidence to the purpose for which it was admitted. Evidence admissible for one purpose is not rendered inadmissible by a separate rule which might preclude it. *United States v. Abel,*469 U.S. 45, 56, 105 S.Ct. 465, 83 L.Ed.2d 450 (1984).

We also reject Brewer’s argument that the district court should have issued a limiting instruction. The omission of such an instruction was not an abuse of discretion because the risk of prejudice to Brewer was not sufficient to require mitigation. *Cf. Outley v. City of New York,*837 F.2d 587, 595 & n. 6 (2d Cir.1988).

We have considered all of Brewer’s arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
#### Alonzo REED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Scott M. KERNAN,* Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-16922.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2007 **.

Filed Feb. 15, 2007.

Alonzo Reed, Represa, CA, pro se.

Steve M. Defilippis, Esq., Picone & Defilippis, San Jose, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Pamela B. Hooley, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and COVELLO ***, Senior Judge.

*

 Scott M. Kernan is substituted for his predecessor as Warden. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. F. 34(a)(2).

***

 The Honorable Alfred V. Covello, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ****

Alonzo Reed (Reed) challenges the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which Reed sought restoration of good time credits he claims were wrongly reduced following a prison disciplinary proceeding.

The evidence before the district court conclusively demonstrated that any restoration of Reed’s credits would have no impact on his release date or his parole period. Reed’s other proffered injuries are insufficient collateral consequences to generate a case or controversy. *See Ramirez v. Galaza,*334 F.3d 850, 858 (9th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.

****

 ■pjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FILED

COURT OF APPEALS DIV I

STATE OF WASIIINGTOM

2018 OCT 22 AM 8:55

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

IN THE MATTER OF THE

PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF:

JOSHUA CAIN KELLERMAN,

Petitioner.

No. 77959-1-1

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: October 22, 2018

Per Curiam. In September 2013, Kellerman pleaded guilty to three counts of

felony violation of a no contact order in Whatcom County Superior Court Cause No.

13-1-100849-4. He filed a personal restraint petition, contending that the court

imposed a sentence that exceeds the five-year statutory maximum on his

convictions. See RCW 26.50.110(5), RCW 9A.20.021(1)(c). The State concedes

error.

We accept the State's concession that the trial court exceeded its authority in

sentencing Kellerman to a twelve-month term of community custody in addition to a

60-month term of confinement. Because the trial court sentenced Kellerman to a

term of confinement that is equal to the statutory maximum for the offense, the court

was required under RCW 9.94A.701(9) to reduce his term of community custody to

zero. See State v. Boyd,174 Wn.2d 470, 275 P.3d 321 (2012); see also State v. 

Winborne,167 Wn. App. 320, 329, 273 P.3d 454.

Accordingly, we grant Kellerman's petition and remand to the trial court to

amend the community custody term consistent with RCW 9.94A.701(9).
No. 77959-1-1/2

For the court:

2

ira,f4ii, j 047
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-10086

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00037-SPM-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff -Appellee

 Cross Appellant, 

versus

SAMIM ANGHAIE, 

SOUSAN ANGHAIE,

 Defendants-Appellants

 Cross Appellees.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(June 7, 2013)

Before CARNES, WILSON, and EBEL,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

 * Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by 

designation. 

Case: 12-10086 Date Filed: 06/07/2013 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Having studied the briefs and the relevant parts of the record, and having 

heard oral argument in this case, we have concluded that there is no merit to the 

Appellants’ arguments that the evidence was insufficient to convict them on the 

counts for which they were convicted. We have also concluded that there is no 

merit to the Appellee’s cross-appeal arguments that the district court erred in the 

amount of the forfeiture it ordered Appellants to pay or in failing to order them to 

pay restitution. 

We are convinced, however, that the district court should conduct an 

evidentiary hearing into the Appellants’ claim regarding the alleged conversation 

between juror Moss and Dr. Abdol Chini about Appellant Samim Anghaie. We 

leave to the district court’s discretion the procedural question of whether to hear 

testimony from Dr. Chini before deciding if it needs to hear testimony from juror 

Moss, or to hear testimony from both of them in any event. We imply no view 

about how the district court should decide the issue once it conducts the 

evidentiary inquiry, nor do we imply any view about whether Appellant Sousan 

Anghaie could be entitled to any relief based on this claim if the alleged 

conversation was not about her. 

The judgment in this case is VACATED AND REMANDED for the limited 

purpose of an evidentiary hearing into the allegations that juror Moss discussed the 

Case: 12-10086 Date Filed: 06/07/2013 Page: 2 of 3 
3

case with Dr. Chini before the trial was complete and for a decision on the issue or 

issues involved in that claim.

Case: 12-10086 Date Filed: 06/07/2013 Page: 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Cancellation of panel meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Comittee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meeting of the Humanities Panel at the Old Post Office, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, has been cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura S. Nelson at (202) 606-8322.

Cancellation

    Date: March 15, 2001.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Room: 730.
    Program: This meeting will review applications for Humanities 
Projects in Media, submitted to the Division of Public Programs at the 
February 1, 2001 deadline.

    Dated: March 28, 2001.
Laura S. Nelson,
Advisory Committee, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-5370 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
Exhibit 15.1




29 April, 2011


Matter No.:871778


Doc Ref: AL/yc/361256


China Sunergy Co., Ltd.


No. 123 Focheng West Road


Nanjing Jiangning Economic & Technical Development Zone


Nanjing


Jiangsu 211100


China


(852) 2842 9595


Andrew.Lee@conyersdill.com





Dear Sirs,





China Sunergy Co., Ltd. (the “Company”)


Annual Report on Form 20-F





We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2010 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the Rules and Regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.








Yours faithfully,







/s/ Conyers Dill & Pearman


Conyers Dill & Pearman
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of GSAA Home Equity Trust 2007-5 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, Greenpoint Mortgage
    Funding, Inc. as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer
    and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EXHIBIT 8.1
 Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited
List of Subsidiaries
 Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationCyber Power Group Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsYingli Green Energy Capital Holding Company Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsYingli Green Energy (International) Holding Company Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsYingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
    
    DelawareYingli Green Energy Europe GmbH
    
    GermanyYingli Green Energy Greece Sales GmbH
    
    GermanyCyber Lighting Holding Company Limited
    
    Hong KongYingli Green Energy Capital Holding (Hong Kong) Company Limited
    
    Hong KongYingli Green Energy International Trading Limited
    
    Hong KongYingli Green Energy Hong Kong Trading Limited
    
    Hong KongBaoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCBeijing Gelin Science and Electronics Technologies Co., Ltd
    
    PRCChengdu Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCFine Silicon Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCYingli Energy (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCYingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCYingli Shuntong (Beijing) International Forwarder Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCBeijing Yingli Green Energy Equipment Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCBeijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Technologies Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCTibet Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCTibet Keguang Industries and Trading Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCSuzhou Yingli Urban Application of PV Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCHainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCHainan Tianneng Power Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCYingli Green Energy France S.A.S
    
    FranceYingli Green Energy Italia S.R.L.
    
    ItalyYingli Green Energy Spain, S.L.U.
    
    Spain
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |  |  |
| /s/ Barton Brookman                               |   | August 7, 2019 |
| Barton Brookman                                   |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |   |   |
| (principal executive officer)                     |   |   |
|                                              |   |   |
| /s/ R. Scott Meyers                               |   | August 7, 2019 |
| R. Scott Meyers                                   |   |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (principal financial officer)                     |   |   |