alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 22, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1.  National Bancshares, Inc.*, Bettendorf, Iowa; to acquire FirstCity Mortgage Corp., Bettendorf, Iowa; and thereby engage in residential real estate lending, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 2, 1001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-5608 Filed 3-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### In the Matter of Konstantin Paderno, Appellant, v Julia Shvetsova, Respondent.

[6 NYS3d 138]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rungs County (Ann Elizabeth O’Shea, J.), dated September 4, 2013. The order denied the father’s objection to so much of an order of the same court (Israella Mayeri, S.M.), dated April 18, 2013, as granted his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation only to the extent of reducing his obligation to the sum of $25 per month.

Ordered that the order dated September 4, 2013, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother and the father have one child, who lives with the mother. In April 2012, the father petitioned for a downward modification of his child support obligation on the ground that his unemployment benefits had run out. At a hearing, the father testified that he was unemployed, living with his mother, and receiving public assistance. The Support Magistrate found that the father had no income, while the mother, who was gainfully employed, had an annual income of $134,806.77. In an order dated April 18, 2013, the Support Magistrate, among other things, directed the father, on the mother’s consent, to pay child support in the sum of $25 per month. The father filed an objection to so much of the order as granted his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation only to the extent of reducing his obligation to $25 per month. He argued that he should not be required to pay even $25 per month since the mother earned a substantial income, while his only resources came from public assistance. The Family Court denied the objection. The father appeals.

Where, as here, “the annual amount of the basic child support obligation would reduce the non-custodial parent’s income below the poverty income guidelines amount . . . the basic child support obligation shall be twenty-five dollars per month” (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [d]), unless the court finds that such basic child support obligation “is unjust or inappropriate, which finding shall be based upon consideration of the [factors set forth in Family Ct Act § 413 (1) (f)]” (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f]). Under the circumstances of this case, where the father was residing rent-free with a relative who was covering his living *983expenses, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in not departing from the statutory $25 per month minimum amount of child support, notwithstanding the disparity in the parents’incomes *(cf. Aregano v Aregano,*289 AD2d 1081 [2001]; *Matter of Monroe County Dept. of Human Servs. v Michael C.,*12 Misc 3d 1166[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 51072[U] [Fam Ct, Monroe County 2006]). Accordingly, the Family Court properly denied the father’s objection.

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Chambers and Barros, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,148
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,466,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                   140,638
<INVENTORY>                                 15,967,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,239,447
<PP&E>                                       7,995,866
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,108,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,786,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,347,272
<BONDS>                                     21,222,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,961,346
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,547
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,763,304)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,786,347
<SALES>                                     35,327,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,327,230
<CGS>                                       27,923,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,228,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,716,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,382,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                   471,991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            910,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                369,007
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   541,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
#### Maria Dolores Gonzalez PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76757.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 23, 2007.

Maria Dolores Gonzalez Perez, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Las Vegas, NV, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Dolores Gonzalez Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s mo*661tion to reopen the underlying denial of her application for cancellation of removal based on her failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her United States citizen daughter.

Petitioner contends that the BIA violated her due process rights by summarily affirming the IJ, and the IJ erred in concluding that she failed to establish the requisite hardship to her qualifying relative.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. *See MartinezRosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). We also lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that the evidence that petitioner submitted with her motion to reopen would not alter its prior discretionary determination that petitioner failed to establish the requisite hardship. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006).

Although we retain jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s constitutional claim, *Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 1001, 1004 (9th Cir.2003), we reject her challenge to the BIA’s streamlining procedures because that claim is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 852 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication. and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP01-21-001]


Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C. and Arkansas Western Pipeline, 
L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 26, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 9, 2001, Ozark Gas Transmission, 
L.L.C. (Ozark) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, to be 
effective February 1, 2001:

First Revised Sheet No. 11
First Revised Sheet No. 12

    Ozark further tendered for filing, as part of the Arkansas Western 
Pipeline; L.L.C. (AWP) FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, 
the following revised tariff sheet, which reflects the cancellation of 
AWP's FERC Gas Tariff, to be effective February 1, 2001:

First Revised Sheet No. 1

    Ozark states that the purpose of its filing is to comply with the 
Commission's order issued December 15, 2000, in Docket No. CP01-21-000. 
(Ozark Gas Transmission, 93 FERC para. 61,281 (2000)) In that order, 
the Commission directed Ozark to notify the Commission within 10 days 
of the effective date its acquisition by merger of its affiliate AWP 
and make tariff filings within 30 days of such date reflecting the 
acquisition in Ozark's tariff and the cancellation of AWP's tariff. 
Ozark's states that its acquisition of AWP occurred on February 1, 
2001.
    Ozark further states that it has served copies of this filing upon 
the company's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before March 2, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5097 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - Docket No. EC99-101-003]

      ( print page 11014)    
Take notice that on January 16, 2001, Southwestern Public Service Company, an Excel Energy Operating Company, tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), a request for approval to fulfill its Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) commitment by joining the Southwest Power Pool rather than the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before March 2, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 384.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4206  Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2010-0318.

#### State v. Hitchcock.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92263, 2009-Ohio-6455. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**EMRU KEBEDE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 21 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**
**the** Unpublished Memorandum and
Order **of the Superior Court at No. 1228 MDA 2014 exited December 4, 2014,**  affirming **the Order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas at No.** 
**CP-36-CR-0003556-2007 exited June 27, 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17 th**  **day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal**

**is** GRANTED **on the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition**

**against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme**

**Court of the United States in** Miller v. Alabama **, 567 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).**

**As a result of the recent holding by that Court that** Miller **must be applied retroactively**

**by the States,** see Montgomery v. Louisiana **, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the**

**Superior Court’s order is** VACATED **, and the case is** REMANDED **for further**

**proceedings consistent with** Montgomery.

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter**
2009-1058.

#### Sigler v. State.

Richland App. No. 08-CA-79, 2009-Ohio-2010. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted.

Cupp, J., dissents.
Exhibit 99.2
             Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the
             Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned, George E. Young, III, is the Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by
the Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date:  May 9, 2003               /s/ George E. Young, III
                                    -------------------------------
                                    George E. Young, III
                                    Senior Vice President and Chief
                                    Financial Officer

<PAGE>
2010-0397.

#### State v. Potter.

Franklin App. No. 09AP-580, 2010-Ohio-372. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2009-1997, *State v. Hodge,*Hamilton App. No. C-080968; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences (1754).                    

*Date/Time:*                         March 28-30, 2001, 8am-5pm.                    

*Place:*                         Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Sylvia Spengler, Division of Biological Infrastructure, Rm 615, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8470.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Biological Database & Informatics proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason For Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: March 1, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-5469  Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 13.1








Officer Certifications Pursuant to Section 906


of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte S.A., a sociedad anónima organized under the laws of Argentina (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:





The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Amendment No. 1”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date: February 6, 2013.





/s/ Edgardo Alberto VolosinName: Edgardo Alberto VolosinTitle: Chief Executive Officer











Date: February 6, 2013.





/s/ Leandro Carlos MonteroName: Leandro Carlos MonteroTitle: Chief Financial Officer