alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-55522]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 173 / Thursday, September 6, 2001 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 46509]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

7 CFR Part 301


Pine Shoot Beetle; Addition to Quarantined Areas

CFR Correction

    In Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 300 to 399, 
revised as of January 1, 2001, appearing on page 34 and 35, 
Sec. 301.50-3(d) is removed. The text was removed by an amendment 
published at 64 FR 387, January 5, 1999.

[FR Doc.01-55522 Filed 9-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4270]


Elmer's Products, Inc., Bainbridge, New York; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA-Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 250(A), subchapter D, chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on 
January 9, 2001, applicable to workers of Elmer's Products, Inc., 
Bainbridge, New York. The notice will be published soon in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The investigation was 
conducted on behalf of the workers at Elmer's engaged in the production 
of hardware adhesives at the Johnson Street, Bainbridge, New York 
location. New findings show that the subject firm also has a facility 
at 151 County Highway 58, Guilford Road, Bainbridge, New York, that 
produces a different type of adhesive.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to limit 
coverage to those workers who are engaged in the production of hardware 
adhesives at Elmer's Products, Inc., Bainbridge, New York.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-4270 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Elmer's Products, Inc., Bainbridge, New York, 
engaged in employment related to the production of hardware 
adhesives who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after October 12, 1999 through January 9, 2003 are eligible to 
apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.''


    Signed at Washington D.C. this 31st day of January, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-4123 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffery Lynn SOUTHERLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-10965

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 2014.

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jeffery Lynn Southerland, Leavenworth, KS, pro se.

*336Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jeffery Southerland has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Southerland has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HOLIFIELD , ATTANASIO , and STEWART Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Steven V. ALVAREZ Machinist ’s Mate (Nuclear) Third Class (E

- 4 ), U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 20 2100114

Decided: 3 September 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : Derek D. Butler
Sentence adjudged 26 January 2021 by a general court

- martial convened at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, and Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 3 , confinement for seven months , and a bad

- conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Commander Michael E. Maffei , JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.United States v. Alvarez , NMCCA No. 2021 00 114 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sen tence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Mili tary Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,797
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,961,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    4,430,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,501,886
<PP&E>                                         5,995,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,681,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,947,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,695,546
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,417,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,947,085
<SALES>                                        5,242,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,242,964
<CGS>                                          2,735,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,196,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (64,811)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18,570)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,170)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Harlan M. Kent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ HARLAN M. KENT     
|Harlan M. Kent         
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 30, 2010         



88
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie J. BURKE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-13160

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 19, 2011.

Christopher P. Canova, Thomas F. Kirwin, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Pamela A. Moine, Lennard B. Register, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Willie J. Burke, Tallahassee, FL, pro se.

William Rourk Clark, Jr., Chet Kaufman, Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Willie J. Burke, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burke’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERFIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.

 

 

I, Tom W. Olofson, ChiefExecutive Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifypursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code,and Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge, (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of theCompany to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| /s/ Tom W.  Olofson                        |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Tom W. Olofson                             |   |
|                                       |   |
| Dated:   May 10,  2005 |   |

 

 

I, ElizabethM. Braham, Chief Financial Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge, (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof the Company to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Elizabeth M.  Braham                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Elizabeth M.  Braham                       |
|                                       |
| Dated:   May 10,  2005 |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals 
and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 30, 2001.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: 31 Center Drive, Conference Rm. B2B32, NHGRI, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-0838.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 28, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-5444 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Washington, D.C. 20429

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a) of the Public Utility

Holding Company Act of 1935 or Section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940

1. Name and Address of Reporting Person* (Last) (First) (Middle)

(Street)

(City) (State) (Zip)

Table I — Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, o

FDIC 6800/04 (04-23)

FORM 4

Check this box if no longersubject to Section 16. Form 4 or Form 5 obligations may continue. 

 See Instruction 1(b).

(Print or Type Responses)

4. If Amendment,

 Date Original

 Filed(Month/Day/Year)

5. Relationship 

Officer (g

6. Individual or 

__

Form fi led 

__

Form fi led 

1. Title of Security

(Instr. 3)

2. Transaction

Date

 (Month/ Day/ Year)

3. Transaction

Code(Instr. 8)

Code V

4. Securities Acquired (A)

or Disposed of (D)(Instr. 3, 4 and 5)

(A) or

 Amount (D) Price

5. Amou

SecuriBenefi Owned ing ReTransa(Instr. 

Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a cu

Reminder: Report on a separate line for each class of securities benefi cially owned directly or indirectly.* If the form is fi led by more than one reporting person, see Instruction 4(b)(v).

2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol3. Date of Earliest

Transcaction Requiredto be Reported (Month/Day/Year)

2A. Deemed

Execution 

Date, if any

 (Month/ Day/Year)

Check this box to indicate that a transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan that is intended to satisfy the affi rmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c). See Instruction 10.

Director

(Check all 
FORM 4 (continued) Table II — Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Benefi cially Owned 

( e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)

1. Title of Derivative

 Security(Instr. 3)

2. Conver- sion or Exercise Price of Deri- vative Security

3. Trans- action Date(Month/Day/Year)

4. Trans-  action Code (Instr. 8)

Code V

6. Date Exer- cisable and Expiration Date (Month/Day/ Year)Date ExpiraExer- tioncisable Date

5. Number of Derivative Securities

Ac-quired (A) orDis-posed of (D)(Instr. 3, 4, and 5)

(A) (D) 

8. Price

ofDeriv

 ative  Secu ity (Instr 5)

7. Title and Amount of Underlying Securities

(Instr. 3 and 4)

 Amount or

 Title Number of

 Shares

Explanation of Responses:** Intentional misstatements or omissions of facts constitute Federal Criminal Violations. **Signature of Reporting Person 

 See 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 15 U.S.C. 78ff (a).Note: File three copies of this Form, one of which must be manually signed. If space is insuffi cient,

see Instruction 6 for procedure.

Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are notrequired to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB Number.

3A. Deemed Execution Date, if  any(Month/Day/Year)

FDIC 6800/04 (04-23)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Biotransplant, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 12, 2001, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Biotransplant, Inc. has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
are Immerge BioTherapeutics, Charlestown, MA; and Infigen, Inc., 
DeForest, WI. The nature and objectives of the venture are to conduct 
research on the genetic modification of pigs by nuclear transfer 
technology.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-5061 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### David MANULLANG; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74431.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Kaaren L. Barr, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Susan M. Harrison, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David Manullang, and his wife, Rachmanita Rachmanita, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *See Konstantinova v. INS,*195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because they did not file the motion within 90 days of the BIA’s final order of removal, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and did not demonstrate a material change in circumstances in Indonesia, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii). We reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA violated their due process rights. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (“To prevail on a due process challenge ... [a petitioner] must show error and substantial prejudice.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERFIFICATIONS OF CEO ANDCFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.

 

I, Tom W. Olofson, Chief Executive Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge, (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company towhich this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Tom W. Olofson |             |
|--------------------|------------------|
| Tom W. Olofson     |
|               |             |
| Dated:             | October 29, 2004 |
|                    |                  |  |

 

 

I, Elizabeth M. Braham, Chief Financial Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 oftitle 18, United States Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof the Company to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Elizabeth M. Braham |             |
|-------------------------|------------------|
| Elizabeth M. Braham     |
|                    |             |
| Dated:                  | October 29, 2004 |
|                         |                  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of First Trinity Financial Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

 

To my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: June 12, 2019  | By: /s/ Jeffrey J. Wood                  |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Jeffrey J. Wood, Chief Financial Officer |   |