alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Vice Chairman’s Schedule

July 2023

Monday, July 3, 2023

10:30 AM Meeting w/staff

Wednesday, July 5, 2023

11:00 AM Meeting w/staff

11:30 AM Meeting w/staff

Thursday, July 6, 2023

11:00 AM Meeting w/staff

12:00 PM Meeting w/Senate Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs staff

3:00 PM Meeting w/staff

Monday, July 10, 2023

11:00 AM Meeting w/staff

2:30 PM Meeting w/staff

3:30 PM Meeting w/staff

4:15 PM Meeting w/staff

Tuesday, July 11, 2023

10:30 AM Meeting w/staff

11:00 AM Meeting w/staff

12:00 PM Meeting w/Chairman Gruenberg, FDIC

2:15 PM Meeting w/American Bankers Association –

Legislative Liaison Advisory Committee
Wednesday, July 12, 2023

9:00 AM Fireside Chat: Conference of State Bank 

Supervisors 2023 State Federal Supervisory 

Forum – Philadelphia, PA

Thursday, July 13, 2023

10:00 AM Meeting w/staff

1:00 PM Meeting w/staff

2:30 PM Meeting w/staff

5:00 PM Meeting w/staff

Friday, July 14, 2023

10:00 AM Meeting w/staff

11:30 AM Meeting w/staff

1:30 PM Meeting w/staff

3:30 PM Meeting w/Christopher Waller, Governor, 

Board of Governors, Federal Reserve Board 

(FRB)

Monday, July 17, 2023

10:30 AM Meeting w/staff

11:00 AM Meeting w/staff

2:00 PM Meeting w/Kentucky Bankers Association

4:00 PM Meeting w/Deutsche Bank staff

4:45 PM Meeting w/staff

Tuesday, July 18, 2023

2:00 PM Meeting w/Chairman Gruenberg, FDIC

4:00 PM Meeting w/staff
Wednesday, July 19, 2023

9:30 AM Meeting w/French Hill, U.S. Congressman, 

2nd District of Arkansas

10:15 AM Meeting w/Bill Huizenga, U.S. 

Congressman, 4th District of Michigan

1:15 PM Meeting w/Blaine Luetkemeyer, U.S. 

Congressman, 3rd District of Missouri

2:45 PM Meeting w/Katie Boyd Britt, U.S. Senator, 

Alabama

4:00 PM Meeting w/staff

Thursday, July 20, 2023

2:00 PM Meeting w/staff

3:30 PM Meeting w/staff

Friday, July 21, 2023

10:45 AM Meeting w/staff

12:00 PM Meeting w/FRB staff

4:00 PM Meeting w/staff

Monday, July 24, 2023

10:00 AM Meeting w/staff

11:30 AM Meeting w/staff

1:00 PM Meeting w/staff

2:00 PM Meeting w/staff

3:00 PM Meeting w/staff

4:30 PM Meeting w/staff

5:00 PM Meeting w/staff
Tuesday, July 25, 2023

10:30 AM Meeting w/staff

11:30 AM Meeting w/staff

2:00 PM Meeting w/staff

Wednesday, July 26, 2023

2:00 PM Meeting w/Chairman Gruenberg, FDIC

3:30 PM Meeting w/J.D. Vance, U.S. Senator, Ohio

Thursday, July 27, 2023

10:00 AM FDIC Board of Directors Meeting

12:30 PM Meeting w/Thom Tillis, U.S. Senator, North 

Carolina

2:30 PM Meeting w/staff

3:00 PM Meeting w/staff

4:00 PM Meeting w/staff

Monday, July 31, 2023

10:00 AM Meeting w/staff
EXHIBIT 10.48
 PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
  
   Cash Sign-on Bonus
  Number of Years from Start Date youVoluntarily Resign or are terminated for Cause:
    
    Sign-on Bonus Repayment Obligation:1 year or less
    
    
    100
    %More than 1 year but less than 2 years
    
    
    50
    %2 years or more
    
    
    0
    %
   Equity Awards




---



##### 



Perquisites
  Bonus Plan
 provided
 Severance
   
    
    Lump sum cash payment equal to your annual base salary in effect on the date of
termination; and
    
    Lump sum cash payment equal to the product of: (i) your annual target bonus (in
effect on the date of termination) and (ii) the actual funding percentage, based on the
achievement of Company financial and strategic factors, used in calculating awards for
executive officers under the Bonus Plan for the year of termination,prorated based on
the date of termination, payable no later than when annual bonuses, if any, are paid to
executive officers of the Company; and
    
    COBRA subsidy for the first twelve (12) months following the month of termination;
provided that such benefits shall be taxable to you to the extent advisable under
Section 105(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
  
    
    Lump sum cash payment equal to your annual base salary in effect on the date of
termination; and




---



##### 




    
    Lump sum cash payment equal to your annual target bonus in effect on the date of
termination; and
    
    Lump sum cash payment equal to your annual target bonus in effect on the date of
termination, prorated based on the date of termination; and
    
    COBRA subsidy for the first twelve (12) months following the month of your
termination; provided that such benefits shall be taxable to you to the extent
advisable under Section 105(h) of the Code.
  earlier provided, however
 Cause




---



##### 



Constructive Termination
  Diminution of Duties and Responsibilities




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Russell HammerRussell Hammer




---



##### 



Restrictive Covenants
 Non-Competition
 Restricted Period
 Competitor
 Clients
  Proprietary Interest




---



##### 



Confidentiality
 Confidential Information
 Confidential Information




---



##### 



Intellectual Property
 Works Prior Works
 Company Works




---



##### 



Specific Performance
  Cooperation with Litigation
  Survival
  Miscellaneous
 Governing Law
 Amendments
 No Waiver
 Severability
 Assignment ab initio
 Set Off; No Mitigation
Exhibit 31.1

**SOX 302 CERTIFICATION**          

 

I, Susan Mills, as senior securitization officer in charge of the depositor function of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by the report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.     Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and

 

5.     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National City Mortgage Co., Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, Wachovia Mortgage Corporation; Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Cenlar FSB, Orchid Island TRS, LLC, MidFirst Bank, and Midland Mortgage Co. 

 

March 31, 2008

 

By: /s/ Susan Mills

Name:  Susan Mills

Title:  Vice President - Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          183,846
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   99,567
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     888,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,171,626
<PP&E>                          98,682
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,293,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,572,779
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        144
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,279,965)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,293,958
<SALES>                         1,856,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,856,270
<CGS>                           1,317,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   780,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              78,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (319,765)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (319,765)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (319,765)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.02)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6841

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ASHLEY REGINA GOOCH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:16-cr-00025-WO-1)

Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 20, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ashley Regina Gooch, Appellant Pro Se. Ripley Eagles Rand, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ashley Regina Gooch appeals the district court’s orders denying her motions for 

reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012), and for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Gooch, No. 1:16-cr-00025-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. 

May 17, 2017; June 22, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00539

- CV
Joe Pittman Young v. Anna S. Lopez, et al.

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 18

- 1038

- CV

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , Joe Pittman Young, although he is exempt from payment due to his inabilit y to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 21, 2019
Exhibit 32.1
             Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the
             Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned, Santo P. Pasqualucci, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the
Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


Date: August 13, 2003                     By: /s/ Santo P. Pasqualucci
     ----------------                        -------------------------
                                          Santo P. Pasqualucci
                                          President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>  26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1998 BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          23,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,824,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125,638
<INVENTORY>                                 15,102,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,837,195
<PP&E>                                       7,740,914
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,883,727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,166,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,291,670
<BONDS>                                     24,664,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,547
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,807,232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,166,985
<SALES>                                     23,467,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,467,952
<CGS>                                       18,538,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,386,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,163,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                918,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                   320,710
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            597,718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   597,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy CEPERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-10124.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Decided April 11, 2014.

Michael Anthony Humphreys, Assistant U.S., Phillip Nelson Smith, Jr., Assistant U.S., USLV-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USRE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*501Billy Cepero, pro se.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Billy Cepero appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying as moot his motion to compel his former counsel to return his case file. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court denied Cepero’s motion because it found that former counsel had already returned the entire case file to Cepero. We review this factual finding for clear error, *see United States v. Yi*704 F.3d 800, 805 (9th Cir.2013), and the court’s denial of Cepero’s motion for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Anthony,*93 F.3d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1996). Because the record supports the district court’s finding, it did not abuse its discretion in denying Cepero’s motion.

To the extent Cepero challenges the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of appellate counsel and the underlying January 30, 2012, judgment, we decline to consider these arguments because they are outside the scope of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen deny i ng r el i ef , t he co ur t m ayhan d do wn an opi ni on b ut i s not 1 re q u i re d to d o s o .”); T EX . R. A PP . P

. 47

. 4 (di s t i ng ui s hi ng op i ni on s an d m em ora nd um op i ni on s ).



### NUM BERS 13-0 9-00 489- CR, 13-0 9-00 490- CR, 13-0 9-00 491- CR, & 13-09-0 0492 -CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG IN RE A RM A ND O R

A M OS On Petit ion fo r Writ of M an da mus . M EM ORA ND UM OPIN ION Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd Ve la Per Curia m M emor andum Opini on 1 Re la t o r, A rm a n d o Ra m o s , p ro se , f il e d a p e t it io n fo r writ o f m a n d a m u s in t h e a b o ve caus es on Augu st 24, 2009, throug h w hic h he cont ends thatthe tr ial co urt er re d i n order ing c o n s ecut iv e s entenc es for hi s c onv icti ons in 1990 for se x ual as saul t and ag g ra v ated sex ual ass aul t of a c hil d. The Co urt re q uest ed and re cei v ed a re spons e to the p eti ti on for w ri t of2

mandamus fro m t h e S t a t e o f T e x a s , a ct i n g b y a n d t h ro u g h t h e D i s t r i ctAtt o r n e y for Cameron C ounty , Tex as. Ma ndamus re li ef maybe g ra nted if the re lat or sh ows t hat: (1 ) the a ct soug ht t o be c o m p e ll e d is p u re ly m in is t e ri a l; a n d (2 ) t h e re is n o a d e qu a t e re m e d y a tla w. Se e D ele on v. Dist. Clerk, 187 S.W .3d 473, 474 (Tex . Cr im. App. 2006) ( or ig . proceed ing ). The rela tor must hav e a “ cl ear r igh t” to the reli ef soug ht an d the mer it s o f the reli ef soug ht mus t be “beyond disp ute .” See i d. “The re q uirement of a cl ear l eg al ri g ht ne ces si tates thatthe law pla inl y des cr ibe s t he duty

to be per

formed s uch that there i s n o room for t he ex erci se of discretion .” See i

d. The Co urt, hav ing ex amined and fully co nsi dered th e petit ion for w ri t of mandamus and t he repl y

thereto, is of the o pin ion thatrela tor h a s n o t s how n hi msel f entit led to the re li ef soug ht. Accordin g ly , the petit ion for w ri t of mandamus i s DE NI ED

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8( a)

. P E RC U R I A M Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s 1 8th d ay

of September , 200 9.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2898 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove lifetime limits 

under State Medicaid programs on medication-assisted treatment for 

substance use disorders. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2018 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. HELLER, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove 

lifetime limits under State Medicaid programs on medication-assisted treatment for substance use disorders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medication-Assisted 

5 Treatment Improvement Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2898 IS

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING LIFETIME LIMITS ON MEDICATION-AS2 SISTED TREATMENT FOR SUBSTANCE USE 

3 DISORDERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1927(d) of the Social Se5 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(d)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘ON’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘AND REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO

8 THE’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(8) NO MAXIMUM LIFETIME LIMIT ON MEDICA12 TION-ASSISTED TREATMENT FOR SUBSTANCE USE

13 DISORDERS.—Any State that provides medical as14 sistance for covered outpatient drugs shall not im15 pose a maximum lifetime limit on medical assistance 

16 for medication-assisted treatments for substance use 

17 disorders that have been approved by the Food and 

18 Drug Administration.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

20 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para21 graph (2), paragraph (8) of section 1927(d) of the 

22 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(d)), as 

23 added by subsection (a)(2), shall take effect on the 

24 first day of the first calendar quarter that begins on 

25 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2898 IS

1 (2) EXCEPTION FOR STATE LEGISLATION.—In 

2 the case of a State plan for medical assistance under 

3 title XIX of the Social Security Act which the Sec4 retary of Health and Human Services determines re5 quires State legislation (other than legislation appro6 priating funds) in order for the plan to meet the ad7 ditional requirement imposed by paragraph (8) of 

8 section 1927(d) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1396r–8(d)), as added by subsection (a)(2), 

10 the State plan shall not be regarded as failing to 

11 comply with the requirements of such title solely on 

12 the basis of its failure to meet this additional re13 quirement before the first day of the first calendar 

14 quarter beginning after the close of the first regular 

15 session of the State legislature that begins after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS