alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 389 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports IN RE ESTATE OF LAKIN Cite as 310 Neb. 389

In re Estate of Charles E. Lakin, deceased. Charles E. Lakin Foundation, Inc., appellant, v. Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer, Copersonal Representatives of the Estate of Charles E. Lakin, appellees. In re Trust of Charles E. Lakin, deceased. Charles E. Lakin Foundation, Inc., appellant, v. Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer, Cotrustees of the Charles E. Lakin Revocable Trust, et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed November 19, 2021. Nos. S-20-093, S-20-094.

supplemental opinion Appeals from the County Court for Douglas County: Stephanie S. Shearer , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. Zachary W. Lutz-Priefert, Frederick D. Stehlik, William J. Lindsay, Jr., and John A. Svoboda, of Gross & Welch, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Edward D. Hotz, Amanda M. Forker, and Benjamin C. Deaver, of Pansing, Hogan, Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for defendants-appellees Thomas L. Pribil and William A. Kilzer. Trenten P. Bausch and Megan S. Wright, of Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P., for appellee Thomas L. Pribil in his individual capacity. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 12/31/2021 01:07 AM CST- 390 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports IN RE ESTATE OF LAKIN Cite as 310 Neb. 389 Cathy S. Trent-Vilim and Brian J. Brislen, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellee William A. Kilzer, an individual.
Heavican , C.J., Cassel , Stacy , Funke , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam

. This case is before us on three motions for rehearing filed by the appellees, Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer—in their individual capacities and their capacities as copersonal rep

resentatives and cotrustees—concerning our opinion in In re Estate of Lakin

. 1 While there is no substantive merit to the motions, Pribil and Kilzer point out that this court incorrectly found that the check used to pay Pribil was not in our record. The check appears in exhibit 59. We overrule the motions, but modify the original opinion to substitute language as follows. In the paragraph under the subheading “7. § 6-1437,” we withdraw the third and fourth sentences and substitute: “Our record is not clear on the source of the payment and the capacity of the person making the payment.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. Miller

- Lerman and Papik , JJ., not participating.

1 In re Estate of Lakin , 310 Neb. 271, 965 N.W.2d 365 (2021).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7518

ODELL EWING,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY CUTLER,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:11-ct-03129-F)

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Odell Ewing, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Odell Ewing appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Ewing v. Cutler, No. 

5:11-ct-03129-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2009-1661.

#### State v. White.

Ashland App. Nos. 07-COA-037 and 07-COA-038, 2009-Ohio-3869.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
**Exhibit 32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of RINO International Corporation on
      Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of RINO International Corporation
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Jade Mountain Corporation.




By:
            /s/
                Zou DejunZou
                DejunChief
                Executive OfficerBy:
            /s/
                Bruce RichardsonBruce
                RichardsonChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to RINO International Corporation and will be retained by RINO
      International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




June
      11,
      2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Brunner
Companies Income Properties L.P. I 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000830737
<NAME> BRUNNER COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES L.P. I
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      147
<ALLOWANCES>                                        51
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,682
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (77)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of  Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I,  Tad M. Ballantyne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Tad M. BallantyneTad
      M. BallantyneChief
      Executive Officer
ADDENDUM AGREEMENT NO. 2
 Addendum Agreement)
 TO COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
 BETWEEN CARDIFF MARINE INC.
OF MONROVIA, LIBERIA, LAWFULLY REPRESENTED (HEREINAFTER
CARDIFF)
 AND
 OCEANTRADE OWNERS LIMITED (M/V TOPEKA)
OCEANPRIME OWNERS LIMITED (M/V RICHMOND)
OCEANWEALTH OWNERS LIMITED (M/V PIERRE)
OCEANSTRENGTH OWNERS LIMITED (M/V LANSING)
OCEANENERGY OWNERS LIMITED (M/V HELENA)
OCEANVENTURE OWNERS LIMITED (M/V AUSTIN)
KIFISSIA STAR OWNERS INC. (M/V AUGUSTA)
OCEANSHIP OWNERS LIMITED (M/V TRENTON)
HEREINAFTER COLLECTIVELY THE OWNERS
  nd
 nd
 nd
 nd
 nd
 nd




---



##### 



nd
 nd
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  




---



##### 



nd




---



##### 



/s/ Michael GregosON BEHALF OF THE OWNERSBy:
    
    Michael GregosTitle:
    
    COO
 /s/ Charalampos AlivizatosON BEHALF OF CARDIFF MARINE INC.By:
    
    Charalampos AlivizatosTitle:
    
    Legal Representative
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2771

To provide military commissary and exchange privileges to the surviving

spouses of veterans dying from a service-connected disability.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide military commissary and exchange privileges to

the surviving spouses of veterans dying from a serviceconnected disability.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe such regula4 tions as necessary to provide military commissary and ex5 change privileges to the surviving spouses of veterans

6 whose deaths were related to a service-connected disability

7 rated less than permanent and total at the time of death

8 on the same basis as such privileges are extended to sur9 viving spouses of veterans who were permanently and to-
2

HR 2771 IH

1 tally disabled due to service-connected disability at the

2 time of death.

Æ
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 24, 2020 

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

AWARDS THE FIRST OF TWO FUND MANAGER CONTRACTS 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) 

announced that it has selected BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. 

(BlackRock) as a fund manager for the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) Fixed Income Index 

Investment Fund (F Fund), Common Stock Index Investment Fund (C Fund), Small 

Capitalization Stock Index Investment Fund (S Fund), and International Stock Index 

Investment Fund (I Fund). The FRTIB will select a second manager which will also 

manage assets for all four Funds. The contract with each manager will be for a two-year 

base period, with four two-year options. 

The F Fund is a bond index fund that tracks the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate 

Bond Index. This broad index includes U.S. Government, Agency, mortgage-backed, 

asset-backed, corporate, and foreign government (issued in the U.S.) sectors of the U.S. 

bond market. As of January 2020, the F Fund held $34.5 billion in assets. 

The C Fund is a stock index fund that tracks the Standard and Poor's 500 (S&P 500) 

Index, a broad market index made up of stocks of 500 large to medium-sized U.S. 

companies. As of January 2020, the C Fund held $225.8 billion in assets. 

The S Fund is a stock index fund that tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Completion Total Stock 

Market Index, a broad market index made up of stocks of U.S. companies not included in 

the S&P 500 Index. As of January 2020, the S Fund held $73.6 billion in assets. 

The I Fund is a stock index fund that tracks the MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, Far 

East) Index, a broad market index made up of the equity markets of the developed world 

outside of the United States and Canada. As of January 2020, the I Fund held $52.7

billion in assets. 

BlackRock, a firm selected through full and open competitions, is the current manager for 

these assets. 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; 

it is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private 
2

employers. As of January 2020, TSP assets totaled 

approximately $631.4 billion, and retirement savings 

accounts were being maintained for more than 5.8 million 

TSP participants. Participants include Federal civilian 

employees in all branches of Government, employees of the 

U.S. Postal Service, and members of the uniformed services. 

Additional information can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00077-CR

Gary VISE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9391

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due March 28, 2014; however, the court granted 

appellant an extension of time until April 28, 2014 to file the brief. Appellant has filed a motion 

requesting an additional extension of time.

We grant the motion and we order appellant’s attorney, Dayna L. Jones, to file the brief 

by May 27, 2014 (60 days after the original due date). Counsel is advised that no further 

extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary 

circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended 

in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be 

completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. If the brief or a conforming motion is 

not filed by the date ordered, the court may abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial 

court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or his counsel has abandoned the appeal.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EX-33.10
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015-10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria
are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(i)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President


Dated: February 29, 2008
#### Richard HOYER; Mary Hoyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHIGAN UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS & EMPLOYERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-1912.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 4, 2007.

Before: SUHRHEINRICH, CLAY and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this dispute over the payment of medical claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001*et seq.,*Richard and Mary Hoyer appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims against the Michigan United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Health and Welfare Fund.

The Hoyers, as *pro se*appellants, have informed the Court that they never authorized their former attorney to file this appeal. They maintain that they did not wish to appeal — wanting instead to be “out of the court system.” Br. at 2. In their appellate brief, the Hoyers have not raised any issues on appeal, *see United States v. Johnson,*440 F.3d 832, 846 (6th Cir.2006) (noting that “[a]n appellant abandons all issues not raised and argued in its initial brief on appeal”) (internal quotation marks omitted), even going so far as to acknowledge that the district court did not make any legal errors, Br. at 2.

Both parties do address the Fund’s motion for costs. But in its order of July 25, 2005, the district court stayed the Fund’s request for costs pending our resolution of this appeal. Because the district court has not ruled on this claim for costs, the issue is not properly before us. *See Soliday v. Miami County, Ohio,*55 F.3d 1158, 1165 (6th Cir.1995).

The Hoyers having abandoned or otherwise waived all of their appellate arguments, we dismiss this appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  395,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (24,298)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,231,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          58,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,521)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,260,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,189,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,212,809
<OTHER-SE>                                   (843,699)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,260,698
<SALES>                                        470,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               470,917
<CGS>                                          626,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  626,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               357,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (552,345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,082
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (556,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (556,427)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.69)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law (92-463) announcement is made of the next meeting of the Inland Waterways Users Board. The meeting will be held on April 11, 2001, in New Orleans, Louisiana, at the Wyndham Hotel New Orleans at Canal Place, 100 Rue Iberville (Tel. (504) 566-7006). Registration will begin at 7:30 a.m. and the meeting is scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m. The meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Norman T. Edwards, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-PD,                               ( print page 13714)                            441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20314-1000.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-5534  Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-92-M