alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAUSE NO. ______________________

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

* * * * *

SHARON DENISE JACKSON, Petitioner / Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent / Appellee

* * * * *

On Petition from a Decision of the Court of Appeals

for the Fifth District of Texas, Dallas Division

in Cause No. 05-14-00283-CR

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TOM PAPPAS

BURLESON PATE & GIBSON, L.L.P.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 330

Dallas, Texas 75202

Telephone: (214) 871-4900

Facsimile: (214) 871-7543

Email: tpappas@bp-g.com

COUNSEL FOR

PETITIONER/APPELLANT

SHARON DENISE JACKSON

1

PD-0520-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 5/4/2015 11:05:06 AM

Accepted 5/4/2015 3:53:42 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, SHARON DENISE JACKSON, Petitioner herein, and

Appellant before the Court of Appealsfor the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, Texas,

and files her Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Discretionary Review.

I.

On April 1, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, Dallas

Division issued its Judgment and Opinion in Cause 05-14-00283-CR. The

Petitioner/Appellant has not filed a motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration

with the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, Dallas Division.

II.

The deadline for Petitioner/Appellant to file her Petition for Discretionary

Review is May 1, 2015. Undersigned counsel has been in two (2) jury trials in the

30 days since April 1, 2015. Counsel needs additional time to work with the

Petitioner/Appellant in preparing the Petition for Discretionary Review. 

III.

Therefore, the Petitioner/Appellant respectfully requests that this Court

pursuant to T.R.App.P. Rule 68.2(c) grant an extension of time to file the Petition for

Discretionary Review to May 18, 2015, fifteen (15) days after the last day for filing

the Petition.

2
PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Petitioner respectfully prays that this Court grant this Motion to Extend

Time to File Petition for Discretionary Review to May 18, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

BURLESON PATE & GIBSON, L.L.P.

/s/ Tom Pappas

_________________________________

TOM PAPPAS

TEXAS BAR CARD NO.15455300

900 Jackson Street, Suite 330

Dallas, Texas 75202

Telephone: (214) 871-4900

Facsimile: (214) 871-7543

Email: tpappas@bp-g.com

COUNSEL FOR

PETITIONER/APPELLANT

SHARON DENISE JACKSON

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This will certify that a copy of the foregoing was delivered by placing same in

the United States Mail via U.S. First Class mail to the following:

Mr. G. Brian Garrison Ms. Lisa M. McMinn

Dallas County District Attorney State Prosecuting Attorney

133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB 19 P.O. Box 13046

Dallas, Texas 75207 Austin, Texas 78711

DATED the 1st day of May, 2015.

/s/ Tom Pappas

_________________________________

TOM PAPPAS

3
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
Kingsley Coach, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Kingsley Coach, Inc. and will be retained by The
Kingsley Coach, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

May 13, 2005                    /s/ John Merkent
                                -------------------------------------------
                                John Merkent (Chief Executive Officer and
                                 Chief Financial Officer)
Order entered August 11 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00531
- CR JAMES EDMOND AUSTIN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 81075
- 2015



### O RDER Appellant’s brief was due July 1, 2016. The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard , the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s
absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is i ndigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written f indings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the fin dings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
# swineoshamatch2002

# osha2002swinecompanywmultestabs
#### Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. *et al. v.*Harrison.

Argued June 7,

Decided July 24, 1901.

Action for damages. Before Judge Estes. Newton superior court. December 1, 1900.

*Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming*and *J. M. Pace,*for plaintiff in error. *B. F. Bdwards, J. F. Bogers, A. D. Header,*and *O. T. Ladson,*contra.

Cobb, J.

Even if the charges complained of were not entirely accurate in the statements of law therein contained, they were not, in view of the evidence, prejudicial to the defendants. The newly discovered evidence was somewhat cumulative and impeaching in character, and it does not appear from the ground of the motion for a new trial based thereon that the facts set out in such evidence could not, by the exercise of proper diligence, have been discovered before or during the trial. The evidence warranted the verdict, and no cause for reversing the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial has been shown. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory J. Rizzo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Spectra
Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.



|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                             
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Gregory J. Rizzo                                                                                                                                                                        
|                   |  | Gregory J. Rizzo President and Chief
Executive Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC General
Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
|                  
|                  
|                  
|
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-00-133]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Siesta Key Bridge, Across the 
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Mile 71.6, Sarasota County, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Siesta Key bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 71.6, 
Sarasota County, Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge owner or 
operator to open only the east span from 8 a.m. until 12 p.m., on 
January 8, 2001. This temporary deviation is required to allow the 
bridge owner to safely complete repairs of the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective on January 8, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Siesta Key bridge across the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway at Sarasota County, has a vertical clearance of 
21 feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the fenders in the 
closed position with a horizontal clearance of 90 feet. On December 13, 
2000, Florida Department of Transportation, the drawbridge owner, 
requested a deviation from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 
117.5 which requires drawbridge to open promptly and fully when a 
request to open is given. This temporary deviation was requested to 
allow necessary repairs to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive 
manner.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.5 for the purpose of repair 
completion of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Siesta Key 
Bridge need only open the east span from 8 a.m. until 12 p.m. on 
January 8, 2001.

    Dated: December 21, 2000.
Greg E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-550 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
#### Neal *v.*Southern Railway Company.

Submitted April 5,

Decided April 26, *1901.*

Action for damages. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. November 7, 1900.

*J. M. McBride,*for plaintiff. *H. M. Dorsey,*for defendant.

Little, J.

It being apparent that the plaintiff himself was negligent, and also that he could have avoided the consequences of the defendant’s negligence (if it was negligent) by the exercise of ordinary care, there was no error in the grant of a nonsuit. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 271 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 271

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the knowing disclosure 
of classified information by Federal officers and employees a criminal 
                                offense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the knowing disclosure 
of classified information by Federal officers and employees a criminal 
                                offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Security and Classified 
Information Protection Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. SECTION 798 AMENDMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 798 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Whoever, being or having been an officer or employee of the 
Federal Government, knowingly discloses, communicates, furnishes, 
transmits, publishes, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized 
person, any classified information, document, or material to which such 
person had access in the course of that Federal Government office or 
employment, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 
twenty years, or both.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 798 of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking out ``subsection (a)'' 
        and inserting ``subsections (a) and (b)'' in lieu thereof; and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
        (c) and (d), respectively.

                                 <all>
```
2009-1586.

#### Lathan v. Duffey.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Maurice Lathan. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

------------

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Dateof earliest event reported) March 30, 2006 

Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation

(Exact Name ofRegistrant as Specified in Charter)

              Nevada                                          0-7246                                      95-2636730

(State or OtherJurisdiction                       (Commission                                (IRSEmployer

          ofIncorporation)                                    File Number)                                IdentificationNo.)

103 East MainStreet; Bridgeport, WV    26330

(Address ofPrincipal Executive Offices)

Registrant'stelephone number, including area code    304-842-3597

Check theappropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneouslysatisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the followingprovisions (*see* General Instruction A.2. below):

[ ] Writtencommunications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Solicitingmaterial pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencementcommunications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencementcommunications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c))

no change

(Former Name orFormer Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

----

Item 7.01.       Regulation FD Disclosure

On April 3-7, 2006, Steven R. Williams, Chairman and CEO,will conduct a Northeast / Midwest Road Show.  The transcript of the slidepresentation and an Adobe PDF file of the slides are attached herein as Exhibit99.1.

----

EXHIBIT INDEX

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c)  Exhibits.

The news releases are filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporatedherein by reference.

----

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on itsbehalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                                             

Petroleum Development Corporation

Date  March 30, 2006    

By  /s/ Darwin L.Stump                                  

      Darwin L. Stump

      Chief FinancialOfficer
LaSalle
      Bank N.A.135
      South LaSalle StreetSuite
      1625Chicago,
      IL 60603Global
      Securities and Trust Services






Annual
Compliance Statement
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 Merrill
Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.
 250 Vesey
Street
 4 World
Financial Center, 10th Floor
 New York,
New York 10080
 
 Loan
Servicing LP
 4828 Loop
Central Drive
 Houston,
Texas 77081
 
 Re:           C-Bass
Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-CB4
 
 
 Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2007 (the "
Agreement"), by and among LaSalle Bank National Association (the "Trustee"),
Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC, as sponsor, Litton Loan
Servicing LP, as servicer and Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as
depositor.
 
 I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee hereby certify that:
 
 (1)
A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and
of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and
 
 (2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year or a portion thereof.
 
 
 Date:
February 27, 2008
 
 LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Trustee
 
 
 /s/
Barbara L. Marik
 Barbara
L. Marik
 Senior
Vice President
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-2669

_____________________________

SAMUEL LEO RICKY SOLOMON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

September 23, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Samuel Leo Ricky 

Solomon, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2294

CHUKWUEMEKA SAMUEL UKAONU,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chukwuemeka Samuel Ukaonu, Petitioner Pro Se. Deitz P. Lefort, Erik Robert Quick, 

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chukwuemeka Samuel Ukaonu, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review 

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the 

immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal.1

 We 

have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Ukaonu’s merits hearing 

and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a 

ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) 

(2012), and that substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility determination. See 

Tewabe v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 533, 538 (4th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Ukaonu (B.I.A. Oct. 6, 2017). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED

 1 Ukaonu does not challenge the denial of his request for protection under the 

Convention Against Torture. He has therefore waived appellate review of this claim. See 

Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 1, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                           8,260
<SECURITIES>                                    51,740
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                      7,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,315
<PP&E>                                           2,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                     761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,447
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,116
<SALES>                                         24,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,898
<CGS>                                           13,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,690
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,129
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>