alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J UA N A UG US T I N C OS UE L OQ U I N T E R O , a .k .a . Ju an A u g u s tin C ons ue l o- Q ui nt e r o, a . k. a . Juan A ugus t i ne C ons ue l o- Q ui nt e r o, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73720 A ge nc yN o. A 044- 279- 866 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Juan A ugus t i n C os ue l o- Q ui nt e r o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rs u m m ar ily



# FI LED NO V 16 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73720 2 di s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f

r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) or de rof r e m ova l . O ur j ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the s u m m aryd is m is s a l o f

an ap p e a l. S i n gh v. G o n za les, 41 6 F . 3d 10 06 , 10 09 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) . We d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n s um m ar i l ydi s m i s s i ng C os ue l oQ ui nt er o’ s app ea l w here he di d n otfi l e ase para t e app ea l bri ef or st at em entas i nd i cat ed i n h i s N ot i ce of A pp ea l and h e f ai l ed t o st at e s peci fi c groun ds for app ea l in h is N o tic e o f

A p p e a l. Se e S in gh v . A s h c r o ft, 36 1 F . 3d 11 52 , 11 57 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) ; G a r c ia - C o r tezv . A s h c r o ft, 36 6 F . 3d 74 9, 75 2 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( the B IA m ay s um m ar i l ydi s m i s s an appe a l i f an a l i e n s ubm i t s no s e par a t e w r i tt e n br i e f or statem en t t o th e B IA an din ad eq u ately in fo rm s th e B IA o f w h at as p ec ts o f th e I J’s deci si on w er e a l l egedl y i ncorrec tand w hy). W e lac kju risd icti o n to re v iew th e u n d er lyin g m er it s o f C o su elo -Q u in tero ’s ap p e a l b e c au s e h e f

a ile dto r a is e th e s e is s u e s b e f o r e th e B I A an dth e r e b yf a ile dto e x h au s t h is a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 678 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( thi s c ou rtl ac ks j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew cont ent i on s notra i se d b ef ore th e a g e n c y ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUMMIT HOLDING SOUTHEAST, INC. AS OF AND
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH SUMMIT HOLDING SOUTHEAST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           216,809
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      23,561
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 247,941
<CASH>                                           8,273
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               8,027
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 542,992
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                354,059
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             33,321
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           15,183
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 14,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,397
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   542,992
<PREMIUMS>                                       7,215
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,439
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 588
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   6,501
<BENEFITS>                                       5,199
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             5,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7765** 

FRANK E. GREEN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. J. PRITTS, CO II; J. GORDON, CO III; R. RITCHIE, CO II; CHRIST WEDLOCK, CO III , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00868

- JFM )

Submitted : April 21, 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Frank Edward Green, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane

Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Frank Edward Green seeks to appeal the district court’s
order s dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying
his motion for reconsideration . We dismiss the appeal for lack of j urisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely
filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period u nder Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bow l e s v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ).
The district court’s final order was entered on the docket

on September 24, 2015

. The notice of appeal was filed on October 28, 2015

. * Because Green failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3 in the materials before th is cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rodney
E. Schwatken, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      April 27, 2009
              
              /s/
      Rodney E. SchwatkenRodney
      E. SchwatkenChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SECOND
QUARTER 10-Q OF ISP HOLDINGS INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                          18,465
<SECURITIES>                                   228,531
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    110,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               514,347
<PP&E>                                         501,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,497,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,670
<BONDS>                                        848,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,497,129
<SALES>                                        389,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               389,006
<CGS>                                          230,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,580
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Javier MARTINEZ-SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-51032

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Javier Martinez-Sandoval raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 100
          - [CGD 05-01-004]
          - RIN 2115-AE46

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT.

      ( print page 13239)    

# ACTION:

Notice of implementation. 

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations for the 22nd Annual Safety at Sea Seminar, a marine event to be held March 31, 2001, on the waters of Spa Creek and Severn River at Annapolis, Maryland. These special local regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic due to the confined nature of the waterway and expected vessel congestion during the event. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for the safety of spectators and vessels transiting the event area.

# DATES:

33 CFR 100.511 is effective from 11:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. on March 31, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief Warrant Officer R.L. Houck, Marine Events Coordinator, Commander, Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2674.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The U.S. Naval Academy Sailing Squadron will sponsor the 22nd Annual Safety at Sea Seminar on the waters of the Severn River Spa Creek at Annapolis, Maryland. Waterbone activities will include demonstrations of life rafts, pyrotechnics, man overboard procedures, and a helicopter rescue. In order to ensure the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.511 will be in effect for the duration of the event. Under provisions of 33 CFR 100.511, vessels may not enter the regulated area without permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Spectator vessels may anchor outside the regulated area but may not block a navigable channel. Because these restrictions will only be in effect for a limited period, they should not result in a significant disruption of maritime traffic.

Dated: February 22, 2001.

T.C. Paar,

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 01-5267  Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,327,378
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,572,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (160,373)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,981,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,289,661
<PP&E>                                             449,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,683,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,998,846
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             3,341
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,451,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,683,493
<SALES>                                          6,698,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,698,759
<CGS>                                            3,986,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,308,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    45,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (53,313)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    383,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                       135,617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       247,393
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.06



</TABLE>
19402 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES

RELATING COMMON CARRIERS

1. The authority citation for part 64

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 47 U.S.C. 225, 47

U.S.C. 251(e)(1).151, 154, 201, 202, 205, 218–

220, 254, 302, 303, and 337 unless otherwise

noted. Interpret or apply sections 201, 218,

225, 226, 227, 229, 332, 48 Stat. 1070, as

amended. 47 U.S.C. 201–204, 208, 225, 226,

227, 229, 332, 501 and 503 unless otherwise

noted.

2. Section 64.702 is amended by

revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:

§ 64.702 Furnishing of enhanced services

and customer-premises equipment.

* * * * *

(e) Except as otherwise ordered by the

Commission, the carrier provision of

customer premises equipment used in

conjunction with the interstate

telecommunications network may be

offered in combination with the

provision of common carrier

communications services, except that

the customer premises equipment shall

not be offered on a tariffed basis.

[FR Doc. 01–9327 Filed 4–13–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–U

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

Radio Broadcasting Services

CFR Correction

In Title 47 of the Code of Federal

Regulations, Parts 70 to 79, revised as of

October 1, 2000, in part 73, § 73.202(b)

is corrected in the Table of FM

Allotments on page 111 under Texas by

removing channel 233A and adding

channel 223A at Wake Village; and on

page 112, under Vermont by removing

Middlebury, Channel 265A, and by

adding Berlin, Channel 265C2 and

Hardwick, Channel 290A.

[FR Doc. 01–55513 Filed 4–13–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
2009-2318.

#### State v. Jones.

Hamilton App. No. C-080518, 2009-Ohio-4190. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion *1472denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2746 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2746

  To amend the White House Conference on Small Business Authorization 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1993

  Mr. LaFalce (for himself and Mrs. Meyers of Kansas) introduced the 
  following bill which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the White House Conference on Small Business Authorization 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the White House Conference on Small Business Authorization Act (15 
U.S.C. 631 note) is amended--
            (1) in section 2 by striking from subsection (a) ``not 
        earlier than January 1, 1994, and not later than April 1, 
        1994'' and by inserting in lieu thereof ``not earlier than May 
        1, 1995, and not later than December 31, 1995'';
            (2) in section 2 by striking from subsection (a) ``December 
        1, 1992'' and by inserting in lieu thereof ``March 1, 1994'';
            (3) in section 5 by striking the second sentence of 
        subsection (a) and by inserting in lieu thereof the following: 
        ``Subsequent to the date of enactment of this Act, but not 
        later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        President shall select and appoint eleven individuals to the 
        Commission.''; and
            (4) in section 9 by striking from subsection (a) 
        ``$5,000,000'' and by inserting in lieu thereof ``$7,000,000''.

                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

___________

No. 24-10248

___________
Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America, Fort Worth Chambe r of Commerce; Longview Chamber of Commerce; American Bankers Association; Consumer Bankers Association; Texas Association of Business,

Plaintiffs—Appellants ,

versus
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; Rohit Chopra, in his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau , Defendants—Appellees

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CV-213

______________________________
UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Before Stewart, Graves, and Oldham, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam:

IT IS ORDERED that appellants’ motion for stay of the District Court’s transfer order pending appeal is administratively stayed until 10:00 a.m. on March 30, 2024. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 29, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
2009-1529.

#### Torrance v. Winkler.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motions to dismiss. Motions to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.