alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
13.2







CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of OceanFreight Inc. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Solon Dracoulis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
March 9, 2010











/s/  Solon
      Dracoulis
 Solon
Dracoulis


Chief
Financial Officer














SK 25754
0001 1077229
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Angel LEMUS-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-51323

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Suite B-207, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Angel Lemus-Reyes raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Yemenidjian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    October 30, 2003



/s/    ALEX
YEMENIDJIANAlex Yemenidjian Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 3,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce L. Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce L. Hartman   
|Bruce L. Hartman       
|Chief Financial Officer
|April 2, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-488, MM Docket No. 00-236, RM-10000] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission, at the request of QueenB Television, LLC,                               ( print page 12895)                            licensee of station WKBT-TV, substitutes DTV channel 41 for DTV channel 53 at La Crosse, Wisconsin.                         *See*65 FR 71291, November 30, 2000. DTV channel 41 can be allotted to La Crosse in compliance with the principle community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference coordinates (44-05-28 N. and 91-20-16 W.) with a power of 1000, HAAT of 446 meters and with a DTV service population of 649 thousand.                     

# DATES:

Effective April 12, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-236, adopted February 23, 2001, and released February 26, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Television
      - Digital television broadcasting

Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336.

§ 73.622

2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments under Wisconsin, is amended by removing DTV channel 53 and adding DTV channel 41 at La Crosse. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Barbara A. Kreisman, 

Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 01-4914 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
FDIC Quarterly FOIA Report

2nd Quarter 2018 (January 1 – March 31, 2018)

1. Number of requests received during quarter: 138

2. Number of requests processed during quarter: 129

3. Number of requests backlogged at end of quarter: 6

4. Status of the FDIC’s ten overall oldest pending FOIA requests from the previous fiscal 

year (i.e., number closed during quarter): All ten (10) requests were closed during the 1st

quarter of FY2018
Exhibit 33.1.6.1

 

**MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE**

**WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA**

 

**March 6, 2008**

 

SunTrust Bank (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i), 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), for securitization transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after December 31, 2005 (the “Platform”). The Asserting Party is not assessing compliance with any other criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR.

 

The Asserting Party used the applicable criteria in paragraph (d) of Title 17, Section 229.1122 of the CFR to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

The Asserting Party has concluded that it has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2007 (the “Reporting Period”).

 

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

SUNTRUST BANK

Solely with respect to Section 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii)

 

| By: /s/Rosealma T. Burton    |
|-----------------------------------|

Name: Rosealma T. Burton

Title: First Vice President

 

SUNTRUST BANK

Solely with respect to Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i)

 

By: /s/Thomas E. Suarez  

Name: Thomas E. Suarez

Title: Group Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derold
L. Kelley, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    August 15, 2007
                                       /s/ Derold L. Kelley
                                       --------------------
                                       Derold L. Kelley
                                       Secretary/Treasurer and Director
#### Norma ROA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73027.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2011.

*27Murray David Hilts, Law Offices of Murray D. Hilts, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Russell John Verby, James A. Hurley, Mark Christopher Walters, Esquire, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Norma Roa, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Mohammed v.*Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Roa’s second motion to reopen as time — and number-barred where the successive motion was filed more than two years after the BIA’s August 8, 2005, order dismissing her underlying appeal, and Roa failed to demonstrate that she qualified for any exception to the time and number limits. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c) (2) — (3).

To the extent we have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority, the BIA acted within its broad discretion in declining to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a).

Roa’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
2009-1994.

#### State v. Throckmorton.

Highland App. No. 08CA17, 2009-Ohio-5344. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No III; cause held for the decision in 2008-0711 and 2008-1005, *State v. Joseph,*Allen App. No. 1-07-50, 2008-Ohio-1138; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on all Propositions of Law.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Cupp, J., not participating.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### The National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

The National Endowment for the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of panel meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Comittee Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the following meeting of the Humanities Panel at the Old Post Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, has been cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laura S. Nelson at (202) 606-8322.

## Cancellation

*Date:*                         March 15, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Room:*                         730.                    

*Program:*                         This meeting will review applications for Humanities Projects in Media, submitted to the Division of Public Programs at the February 1, 2001 deadline.                    

Dated: March 28, 2001.

Laura S. Nelson,

Advisory Committee, Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-5370  Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed statement of financial condition and the consolidated
statements of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         695,167
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,011,594
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 20,884,115
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,226,208
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,254,995
<LOANS>                                     68,922,033
<ALLOWANCE>                                    511,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,141,259
<DEPOSITS>                                  78,073,134
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,512,072
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,547
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,541,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             105,141,259
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,241,583
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              438,942
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                60,030
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,740,555
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             722,874
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             759,202
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          981,353
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             120,394
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                734,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                395,560
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     395,560
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   253,160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.89
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               501,437
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              511,437
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           390,937
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        120,500
        

</TABLE>
#### Jorge GEVARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F.B. HUBBARD, Superintendent; Crutchfield, Assist. Superintendent of Programs; Debra Duncan, R.N.—Medical Administrator; C. Fields, Correctional Officer; David Ostorne, Asst. Director Prisons; Paula Y. Smith, Medical Director of Prisons; Theodis Beck, Secretary of Prisons; D. Jones Murphy, Nurse; Amy S. Mackey; Peter Keyser; Mr. Perritt, Unit Manager; T. Jones, Asst. Unit Manager; P. Bethea, Correctional Officer; Purcel, Correctional Officer; Quick, Sergeant; Miller, Sergeant; Ashe Harris, Notary Public; Director of Prisons Boyd Bennett, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7481.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 21, 2011.

*773Jorge Gevara, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Gevara’s “Motion to Amend an Order to Show Cause and for an Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order and Appointment of Counsel as a Support of Any Error and Objections to the Magistrate’s Opinion & Order.” This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*837 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Gevara’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.2
             Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the
             Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      The undersigned, George E. Young, III, is the Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by
the Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date: August 12, 2003                     By: /s/ George E. Young, III
     ----------------                        -------------------------
                                          George E. Young, III
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>  27
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 3

- 00 438

- C R



### ____________________

IN RE DAVID E. STANLEY

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David E. Stanley filed a petition for writ of mandamus through which he

seeks to compel the trial court to rule on pro se motions that Stanley filed while he

was represented by counsel. Stanley failed to establish a clear abuse of discretion

by the trial court. See Landers v. State , 550 S.W.2d 272, 280 (Tex. Crim. App.

1977) (op. on reh’g). The petition for writ of mandamus i s denied.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered October 30, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.