alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1




Officer Certifications Pursuant to Section 906


of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350. chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte S.A., a sociedad anónima organized under the laws of Argentina (the "Company"), does hereby certify to such officer's knowledge that:




The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: JUNE 13TH, 2011
/s/ Alejandro MacfarlaneName: Alejandro MacfarlaneTitle: Chief Executive Officer





Date: JUNE 13TH, 2011
/s/ Luis Pablo Rogelio PaganoName: Luis Pablo Rogelio PaganoTitle: Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS OFCEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.

 

I, Tom W. Olofson, ChiefExecutive Officer of Epiq Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifypursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code,and Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge, (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company towhich this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Tom W. Olofson |   |
|--------------------|--------|
| Tom W. Olofson     |   |

 

Dated:    October 30, 2008

 

 

I, Elizabeth M. Braham,Chief Financial Officer of Epiq Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge, (1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of theCompany to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Elizabeth M. Braham |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Elizabeth M. Braham     |   |

 

Dated:    October 30, 2008

 

1

----
2010-0303.

#### State v. Phillips.

Highland App. No. 09CA13, 2009-Ohio-7069. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David W. Roberts, Appellant.

[4 NYS3d 574]

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd, J.), rendered March 18, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.75 [1] [b]). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw the guilty plea *(see People v Said,*105 AD3d 1392, 1393 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1019 [2013]). “[Defendant's conclusory and unsubstantiated claim of innocence is belied by his admissions during the plea colloquy” *(People v Garner,*86 AD3d 955, 955 [2011]). Contrary to defendant’s further contentions, his fear of an unfair trial or the imposition of a longer sentence after trial do not constitute coercion *(see generally People v Jackson,*90 AD3d 1692, 1693 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 958 [2012]; *People v Dumpson,*238 AD2d 802, 803 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 892 [1997]; *People v Patrick,*163 AD2d 84, 84 [1990], *lv denied*76 NY2d 895 [1990]).

Defendant’s contention that the court’s redaction of the presentence report (PSI) was inadequate is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as he did not raise the issue before the sentencing court *(see generally People v Gibbons,*101 AD3d 1615, 1616 [2012]). In any event, although the words in the paragraph that the court redacted remain visible, it is evident from the court’s notation thereon that the paragraph was redacted and that the material is not available for use against defendant *(cf. People v Howard,*124 AD3d 1350, 1351 [2015]).

Present — Scudder, P.J., Lindley, Valentino and DeJoseph, JJ.
#### Clarke Brothers *v.*Fox

Argued June 13,

Decided July 22, 1901.

Little, J.

A motion to set aside a judgment rendered against a partnership as garnishee in default of answer, on the grounds, that “ if the garnishment summons was ever served upon them, it was so served at a time when the partner served was on the eve of departure for Europe, whence he returned late in the year, . . that the partner who took his place in the office was not advised of the service,” and that they were not indebted to the defendant' but he was indebted to them, was properly overruled. The grounds stated do not show prima facie that the garnishees were prevented from making answer by accident, mistake, or any unavoidable circumstance for which the law will have regard; and therefore this case does not come within the ruling made in *Atlanta Journal*v. *Brunswick Publishing Co.,*Ill *Ga.*718.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*

*1054Motion to set aside judgment. Before Judge Seabrook. McIntosh superior court. November 27, 1900.

*Charlton & Charlton,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Gignilliat & Stubbs,*contra.
#### Ralph Guerrucci, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v School District of City of Niagara Falls, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[4 NYS3d 564]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered March 25, 2014. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs seeking relief from a judgment (denominated order) entered October 24, 2013.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Guerrucci v School Dist. of City of Niagara Falls*([appeal No. 1] 126 AD3d 1498 [2015]).

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 7, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 07-10435

_________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00123-CV-4-SPM-WCS

FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL

LOBBYISTS INC., 

a Florida not for profit corporation,

SPEARMAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY,

a Florida corporation,

GUY M. SPEARMAN, III,

a natural person,

RONALD L. BOOK, PA,

a Florida professional association,

RONALD L. BOOK,

a natural person,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

DIVISION OF LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION

SERVICES OF THE FLORIDA OFFICE OF

LEGISLATIVE SERVICES,

a Florida state agency,

THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON ETHICS,

an independent constitutional commission,

TOM LEE, 

as president of the Florida Senate,

ALLAN BENSE,

as speaker of the Florida House of Representatives,

Defendants-Appellees,
_____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida 

______________________

(May 7, 2009)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge and MARTIN,*

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In the light of our earlier opinion in this case and the opinion of the

Supreme Court of Florida on questions of Florida law that we had certified to that

honorable Court, we affirm the judgment of the district court. For background, see

Fla. Ass’n of Prof’l Lobbyists v. Div. of Legislative Info. Servs., 525 F.3d 1073

(11th Cir. 2008), and Fla. Ass’n of Prof’l Lobbyists v. Div. of Legislative Info.

Servs., No. 08-791, 2009 WL 702854 (Fla. Mar. 19, 2009).

AFFIRMED.

Honorable Beverly B. Martin, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia, *

sitting by designation.

2
Exhibit
99.2
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Surjit
Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Surjit Singh Gill,
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.
 
 
 October
20, 2008
 
 SURJIT SINGH
GILL
 Surjit
Singh Gill
 Chief
Executive Officer,
 President
and Director
 
 
 
 
 -1-
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-507-009]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

January 3, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 22, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso) tendered for filing and acceptance by the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) the following tariff sheets in its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1-A, to become effective 
February 1, 2001:

First Revised Sheet No. 219C
Original Sheet No. 219D

    El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to 
implement the Topock Delivery Rights Capacity Allocations required by 
the Commission's order issued October 25, 2000 at Docket No. RP99-507.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-524 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2009-1218.

#### Kern v. Mentor.

Lake App. No. 2008-L-157, 2009-Ohio-2437.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          11,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,393
<INVENTORY>                                     82,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,317
<PP&E>                                         110,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,464
<BONDS>                                        135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     36,423
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,978
<SALES>                                        114,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,874
<CGS>                                           92,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   167
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
    
       

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Sep-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 Mar-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   Jun-27-1997
<CASH>                         101,585
<SECURITIES>                   0      
<RECEIVABLES>                  491,216      
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    4,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               683,550
<PP&E>                         169,596           
<DEPRECIATION>                 73,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 816,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          475,233
<BONDS>                        93,349            
<COMMON>                       251,640       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0   
<OTHER-SE>                     1,175  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   816,006
<SALES>                        156,355           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               156,355
<CGS>                          0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  159,312   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               7,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             7,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (10,724)         
<INCOME-TAX>                   (2,405)        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            0
<DISCONTINUED>                 0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0   
<CHANGES>                      0        
<NET-INCOME>                   (8,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (.002)       
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.002)  

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J.
Wade Mezey,Chief Executive Officer of Mezey Howarth Racing Stables, Inc. (the
"Company"), do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief
that:





(1) The
Company’s 10-K (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 15, 2008








By: /s/
Wade Mezey


-
----------------------


J. Wade
Mezey, CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                                  13
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                           201
<INVENTORY>                                         16,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    25,311
<PP&E>                                               6,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      31,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               10,745
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                39
<OTHER-SE>                                          18,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        31,132
<SALES>                                             13,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    13,722
<CGS>                                                9,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        9,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                           602
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .26
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0106. MATTHEW STEVEN CHANDLER v. TIMOTHY STEWART

ROHNER.

Timothy Stewart Rohner filed a petition to adopt the biological children of

Matthew Steven Chandler.1 The trial court entered a final judgment and decree of

adoption, and Chandler filed an application for discretionary appeal from that order.

We granted Chandler’s application because final orders of adoption may be appealed

directly under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a).2 Rohner subsequently filed a motion to dismiss

Chandler’s appeal based on his failure to timely pay court costs and file a transcript.

The trial court granted this motion on September 19, 2014, dismissing Chandler’s

appeal, and Chandler filed this application for discretionary appeal from that order.

“The dismissal of an appeal by the trial court is subject to direct appeal.” 

Castleberry’s Food Co. v. Smith, 205 Ga. App. 859, 860 (424 SE2d 33) (1992). We

will grant an otherwise timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is

subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is

hereby GRANTED. Chandler shall have ten days from the date of this order to file

a notice of appeal with the trial court. If, however, he has already filed a notice of

appeal from the order at issue, he need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial

court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the

1 The trial court denied Chandler’s petition to legitimate the children, and we

granted Chandler’s application for discretionary appeal from this ruling. That appeal

is pending before us as Case Number A14A1850.

2 Chandler v. Rohner, Application Number A14D0393 (granted July 1, 2014).

November 04, 2014
Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/04/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
FORM 10-Q (6-30-97) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      28,741,677
<SECURITIES>                                12,881,112
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,910,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,998,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,760,410
<PP&E>                                       5,299,129
<DEPRECIATION>                                 730,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,503,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,070,144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       247,413
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,087,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,503,804
<SALES>                                     19,278,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,278,073
<CGS>                                        7,766,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,766,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,954,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (728,899)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,286,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,672,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,614,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,614,117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>