alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, USDA, ARS.

NDB Number*

Calories

Calories From Fat

Total FatSaturated FatCholesterolSodium

Total Carbohydrate

Protein

Vitamin A

Vitamin CCalcium

Iron

United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service September 2011

Cooked (by moist or dry heat with 

no added ingredients), edible weight 

portion. Percent Daily Values (%DV) 

are based on a 2,000 calorie diet.

 Serving Size 3 ounces (84g)

Chicken

Whole Chicken w/o neck & giblets, roasted 5009 200 100 11 

18 

3 

16 

75 

25 

70 

2 

 0 

 0 23 0 0 0 6% 

Chicken Breast , roasted 5060 170 60 7 10 

2 

9 

70 

24 

60 

2 

 0 

 0 25 0 0 0 4% 

Chicken Wing , roasted 5103 240 150 16 

25 

4.5 

23 

70 

24 

70 

2 

 0 

 0 23 0 0 0 6% 

Chicken Drumstick Chicken Drumstick , roasted 5069 180 80 9 14 

2.5 

13 

75 

25 

75 

4 

 0 

 0 23 0 0 0 6% 

Chicken Thigh , roasted 5094 210 120 13 

20 

3.5 

18 

80 

26 

70 

2 

 0 

 0 21 0 0 0 6% 

Turkey

Whole Turkey w/o neck & giblets, roasted 5166 170 70 8 13 

2.5 

12 

70 

13 

55 

2 

 0 

 0 24 0 0 0 8% 

Turkey Breast Turkey Breast , roasted 5192 160 60 6 10 

 2 

9 

60 

21 

55 

2 

 0 

 0 24 0 0 0 6% 

Turkey Wing , roasted 5196 190 90 10 

16 

3 

14 

70 

23 

50 

2 

 0 

 0 23 0 0 0 6% 

Turkey Drumstick , roasted 5194 170 70 8 13 

2.5 

13 

70 

24 

65 

2 

 0 

 0 23 0 0 0 10% 

Turkey Thigh Turkey Thigh , roasted 5184 190 90 10 

15 

3 

15 

75 

25 

65 

2 

 0 

 0 23 0 0 0 10% 

Poultry provides negligible amounts 

of dietary fiber and sugars.

Nutrition Facts

Chicken & Turkey
Student Handout- Module Number Eight (8) - Steam, Batch, Still Retorts 

Steam, Batch, Still Retorts 

Characteristics of these retorts: 

 Pressure Vessel 

 Batch-type 

 Non-agitating 

 Vertical or horizontal 

 With or without crates 

Advantages of using Steam: 

 Excellent Medium for Heat Transfer 

 Temperature Easily Regulated 

 Pressure Can Counter- balance Internal Can Pressure 

 Easy to Produce and Stored for Instant Use 

Three different models: 

- Vertical – Equipment sits vertically, loaded from the top in baskets or similar 

- Horizontal – Equipment sits horizontally, loaded from the end in crates or similar 

- Craterless – Equipment sits vertically but is loaded from the top using gravity with 

containers dropping inside the retort in no definite order (jumbled or mixed up) 

Page 1 
 

 

 

Compressed air 

1 

8 

Controller 

Steam --' :1--'---..J 

I Automatlc 

--!"~~ control valve 

Drain 

-W- Manual valve 

Cooling water 

Instrumentation needed: 

 Temperature indicating device (Mercury-in-Glass - MIG) or equivalent device (e.g., 

Resistance Temperature Device – RTD or Digital Temperature Gauge-DTG) Item #4 

 Temperature/time recording device - Item # 6 

Requirements: 

External well: 

 Must be connected through at least a 3/4” opening 

 Must have at least a 1/16” bleeder opening 

Page 1 

Steam Inlet: Must be large enough for proper operation; Must facilitate air removal; Must be 

located opposite the vent. 

Page 2 
Steam Spreaders – Vertical Retorts: Not required for vertical retorts. If used, usually in form of 

a cross and perforations along the top or side. All others: Total cross-sectional area should be 

equal to 1.5 to 2 times the cross-sectional area of the smallest part of the steam inlet line. 

Vents: Large valve-controlled openings to remove air from the retort; Located opposite steam 

inlet; Controlled by a full flow valve or equivalent; Atmospheric break between vent and closed 

drain required. 

Construction of Crates, Carts and Divider Plates: Constructed of suitable materials; 

Perforations shall be 1” holes on 2” centers or equivalent (27% open area). 

Bleeders: Small openings, normally 1/16 to 1/8 inch in diameter used to remove air from steam 

retorts and circulate the steam while they are in operation; Open during come up and 

processing; Bleeders must be within 1 foot of outermost containers and no more than 8 feet 

apart along the top of the horizontal retort. 

Mufflers: Used on bleeders and vents to decrease noise; Must not impede normal operation. 

Page 3
#### Charlotte B. JOHNSON, Appellant v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Nos. 09-1322, 09-3966.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Monday, Jan. 24, 2011.

Filed: Feb. 4, 2011.

Dennis L. Friedman, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Susan R. Becker, Esq., Virginia A. Gibson, Esq., Nicole R. Mark, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary Of Veterans Affairs.

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SMITH, Circuit Judge, and STEARNS,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Richard G. Stearns, District Court Judge, District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Judge.

Appellant Charlotte B. Johnson appeals the district court’s grant of Appellee Secretary of Veterans Affairs’ motion for summary judgment on Johnson’s Title VII retaliation claim and motion for judgment as a matter of law on Johnson’s Title VII discrimination claim. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm.

Because we write primarily for the parties, we need not repeat the facts and procedural history of this case. Moreover, the district court has ably summarized that background. *See Johnson v. Nicholson,*2009 WL 2180352 (E.D.Pa. July 20, 2009); *Johnson v. Nicholson,*575 F.Supp.2d 683 (E.D.Pa.2008). On appeal, Johnson argues that the district court erred (1) when it granted the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment on Johnson’s retaliation claim based on her failure to timely exhaust her administrative remedies; and (2) when it granted the Secretary’s motion for a judgment as a matter of law on Johnson’s Title VII discrimination claim based on her failure to present legally sufficient evidence of discrimination at trial.

In the detailed and thoughtful opinions Judge Tucker filed in this case, she carefully and clearly explained her reasons for the rulings Johnson is appealing. *See Johnson v. Nicholson,*2009 WL 2180352 (E.D.Pa. July 20, 2009); *Johnson v. Nicholson,*575 F.Supp.2d 683 (E.D.Pa.2008). We can add little to Judge Tucker’s reasoning and we will therefore affirm those rulings substantially for the reasons set forth in those opinions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,600
<OTHER-SE>                                    (50,855)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,254
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,106)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5469]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences (1754).
    Date/Time: March 28-30, 2001, 8am-5pm.
    Place: Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Sylvia Spengler, Division of Biological 
Infrastructure, Rm 615, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8470.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Biological Database & Informatics 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 1, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-5469 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
NO. PD-1067-15
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS EX PARTE JAMES RICHARD “RICK” PERRY,

Appellant

________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 390th Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas, Cause No. D-1-DC-14 100139

________________________________________________________ APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE POST-ORAL ARGUMENT SUBMISSION IN CONNECTION WITH HIS BRIEF ON THE MERITS ADDRESSING HIS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

________________________________________________________ TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW Appellant, James Richard "Rick" Perry (Governor Perry), and pursuant to Tex.R. App.P. 71.4, seeks leave of Court to file a brief, post-oral argument submission. As the Court is aware, oral argument was presented on November 18, 2015. Governor Perry desires to file a brief, post-oral argument submission in order to provide cases which were discussed, but not specifically identified during the oral argument. Furthermore, precise page references to all of the State's judicial admissions appear to be necessary and appropriate. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Governor Perry prays that this PD-1067-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 11/23/2015 3:54:41 PM Accepted 11/23/2015 4:04:21 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKCo urtg ran tthi s m o t i o nan d al l o w th e fi li n g o f h i s p os t -o ral arg um en t s ub m i s s i o n
. Res p ect fu l ly

s ub m i t t ed , BOTSFORD & ROARK / s / Da vi d L. Bo t

s fo rd Dav i dL. Bo t s fo rd St at e Bar No

. 0 2 6 8 7 9 5 0 1 3 07 W es tAv e. Au s ti n, Tex as 7 8 7 0 1 db ot s fo rd @ao l

. co m Tel ep h o n e: 5 1 2 -4 7 9-8 0 3 0 Facs i m i l e: 5 1 2 -4 7 9 -8 0 4 0
THE BUZBEE LAW

FIRM / s / An th on y G. Buz b ee An th o n y G. Bu zb ee St at e Bar No

. 2 4 0 0 1 8 2 0 J PM o rg anCh as e To wer 6 0 0 Trav i s Street , Su it e 7 3 0 0 Ho u s t o n , Tex as 7 7 0 02 Tb u zb ee@ t x at t o rn ey s .co m Tel ep h o n e: 7 1 3 -2 2 3-5 3 9 3 Facs i m i l e: 7 1 3 -2 2 3 -5 9 0 9
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. / s / Th o ma s R. Ph i l l i

p s Th o m as R. Ph i l l i p s St at e Bar No

. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 9 8 San J aci n t o Bl v d ., Su it e 1 5 0 0 Au s ti n, Tex as 7 8 7 0 1 -4 0 7 8 t o m .p h i l l i p s @ b ak erb o tt s
. co m Tel ep h o n e: 5 1 2 -3 2 2-2 5 6 5 Facs i m i l e: 5 1 2 -3 2 2 -8 3 6 3Certi fi ca te o f Serv ice

I h ereb y cert ify th at a tru e an d co rrect co p y o f th e ab o v e an d fo r e g o i n g h as b een del iv eredt o al l co un sel atth e t i m e i twas el ectro n i cal ly fi l ed

. BOTSFORD & ROARK / s / Da vi d L. Bo t

s fo rd
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                   ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Baron, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 4, 2006                      Richard A. Baron
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard A. Baron,
                                           Executive Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer

This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13781-13782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA920-1310-FI: CAS 019727B]


California: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil 
and Gas Lease

    Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease CAS 019272B for lands in Kern 
County, California, was timely filed and was accompanied by all the 
required rentals and royalties accruing from November 1, 2000, the date 
of termination.
    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has 
agreed to amend lease terms for rentals and royalties at the rate of 
$5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, 
respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee 
and $125 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal 
Register notice.

[[Page 13782]]

    The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the 
lease set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing 
Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is 
proposing to reinstate lease CAS 019272B effective November 1, 2000, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bonnie Edgerly, Land Law Examiner, 
California State Office (916) 978-4370.

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
Leroy M. Mohorich,
Chief, Branch of Energy, Mineral Science, and Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 01-5477 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
EX-35.1
(logo) AVELO MORTGAGE



Annual Compliance Statement

Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GSAA HET
2007-5.

1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. This review was completed under
my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

Avelo acknowledges that for a period in 2007, bank accounts were not reconciled
in strict compliance with Reg. AB. To address this issue, Avelo added
additional staff to ensure timely reconciliations and compliance with Reg AB.
As of the date of the audit, all bank account reconciliations were current. No
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

Avelo also acknowledges that for a period in 2007, escrow funds were not
returned to the obligor within 30 calendar days of full repayment in compliance
with Reg. AB due to a system issue. A system enhancement erroneously affected
the refund check process. Once the issue was identified, the system was
corrected.

As of December 31, 2007, escrow fund refunds were returned to the obligor
within 30 calendar days of full repayment, and no issues were found or arose
from the delay in returning the funds to the account holders.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.


/s/ David M. Altshuler
Name: David M. Altshuler
Title: Vice President and CFO
Date: March 10, 2008



Avelo Mortgage, LLC     250 E. John Carpenter Fwy       Irving, Texas 75062
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from JWH Global
Trust for the second quarter of 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001027099
<NAME> JWH GLOBAL TRUST

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     103,370,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  749,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           104,119,819
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             104,119,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,944,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 101,175,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               104,119,819
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,738,323
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,677,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,060,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,060,792
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,060,792
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.17


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00287-CV

Juan RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

Mary BOLANOS,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-12393

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial. It is ORDERED 

that appellant, Juan Rodriguez, recover his costs of this appeal from appellee, Mary Bolanos.

SIGNED May 29, 2013.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

 1

The Honorable Karen H. Pozza signed the default judgment in the underlying cause; however, the Honorable 

Antonia Arteaga signed the order denying the motion for new trial.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Jenna L. Kemp, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
    10-K of Bear Stearns ARM Trust 2007-4 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
    do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
    respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
    by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and
    based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the
    servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of
    Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
    the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
    agreements in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
    of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
    and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
    this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Jenna L. Kemp
    Signature

    Executive Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
#### STRATEGIC HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION OF TRAVIS COUNTY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 10-846.

Feb. 22, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.