alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AN FSIS EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCED AN 

INJURY OR ILLNESS.

OSHA Recordable

Complete OSHA Forms 

301 and 300.

No action is needed 

because it is not an 

OSHA recordable 

incident. 

Workers’ 

Compensation

Does the employee 

want to file a workers’ 

compensation claim? If 

so, complete Form CA1 

or CA2. 

Note: A CA1/CA2 form 

is completed only when 

an employee requests 

to file a claim. 

OSHA Reportable

Report it to OSHA, the FSIS 

District Manager, and the 

FSIS ESHG Occupational 

Safety and Health Specialist 

assigned to the District 

AND complete OSHA 

Forms 301 and 300.

YES

YES

NO

NO

Event does not get 

recorded on an OSHA 

Form.

NO

YES

At the end of the calendar year, summarize the OSHA 

Form 300 using the OSHA Form 300A. Post the 300A 

from February 1 to April 30.

Also

And And

Is it work-related?

Did the following occur within 24 hours of the injury/illness: 

• An inpatient hospitalization?

• Amputation? 

• Loss of an eye? 

OR

Did a fatality occur within 30 days of the injury/illness?

Did it result in any of the following:

• Days away from work?

• Medical treatment beyond first aid?

• Loss of consciousness?

• Restricted work or transfer to another job?

OR

• Has a licensed health care professional 

diagnosed a significant injury or illness? 

Instructions: 

Please refer to 

www.tinyurl.com/FSISESHG under OSHA 

Topics for 

supplemental 

information on the 

OSHA forms (301 

report, 300 log, 300A 

summary). Further 

information on workers’ 

compensation can be 

obtained by sending an 

email to: 

askworkerscomp@fsis.

usda.gov or by calling 

1-800-370-3747.

A dotted line 

box refers to a 

WC process.

A curved 

box is a 

decisionmaking 

question.

A rectangular, 

gray box is an 

action or 

status. 

FSIS Environmental, Safety and Health Group

FSIS EMPLOYEE INJURY AND ILLNESS RECORDKEEPING 

FLOWCHART
# FY21Q1

# FY21Q2

# FY21Q3

# FY21Q4

# AMR - User Notes
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ChasePackaging Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuantto Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| May 14,  2008 | /s/ Allen T.  McInnes                           |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|               | Allen T. McInnes                                |
|               | Chairman of the  Board, President and Treasurer |
|               | (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |

 

----
EX-35.1
(logo) AVELO MORTGAGE



Annual Compliance Statement

Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GSAMP Trust
2007-HE2.

1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. This review was completed under
my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

Avelo acknowledges that for a period in 2007, bank accounts were not
reconciled in strict compliance with Reg. AB. To address this issue, Avelo
added additional staff to ensure timely reconciliations and compliance with Reg
AB. As of the date of the audit, all bank account reconciliations were current.
No issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

Avelo also acknowledges that for a period in 2007, escrow funds were not
returned to the obligor within 30 calendar days of full repayment in compliance
with Reg. AB due to a system issue. A system enhancement erroneously affected
the refund check process. Once the issue was identified, the system was
corrected.

As of December 31, 2007, escrow fund refunds were returned to the obligor
within 30 calendar days of full repayment, and no issues were found or arose
from the delay in returning the funds to the account holders.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.


/s/ David M. Altshuler
Name: David M. Altshuler
Title: Vice President and CFO
Date: March 10, 2008



Avelo Mortgage, LLC     250 E. John Carpenter Fwy       Irving, Texas 75062
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10150

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ARMENTA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-145-Y

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

José Armenta pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of a

substance containing methamphetamine. He appeals the denial of

his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and further asserts that

he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no error

in the district court’s application of the factors to be

considered in deciding whether to grant a motion to withdraw. 

See United States v. Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984). 

Armenta’s assertion of innocence was equivocal at best, and he
No. 04-10150

-2-

provided no good justification for his delay in seeking to

withdraw his guilty plea. See id. We also find no error in the

district court’s determination that withdrawal of the plea would

inconvenience the court and would waste judicial resources. 

The district court’s findings that Armenta had close

assistance of counsel and that his plea was made knowingly and

voluntarily are supported by the record. The district court

conducted a thorough Rule 11 colloquy, and Armenta affirmed that

he understood the nature of the charges and denied any coercion.

Armenta has failed to overcome the presumption of veracity that

attaches to statements made under oath in open court. See United

States v. Cervantes, 132 F.3d 1106, 1110 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the denial of Armenta’s motion to

withdraw.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40916

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HECTOR RUIZ, also known as Hector Ruiz-Perez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:10-CR-1167-1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Ruiz has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Ruiz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ruiz’s response. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Ruiz’s pro se response arguing that counsel was ineffective

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40916 Document: 00511510827 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2011
No. 10-40916

for not demonstrating the invalidity of a prior conviction does not present a

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-40916 Document: 00511510827 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2011
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (the
Corporation) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Corporation.

|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                  |  | /s/ John Hopkins                     
|                  |  |                                      
|                  |  | John Hopkins, Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  |                                      
|November 12, 2002 |  |
EXHIBIT
32.01





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION


OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER




I, Gerald
Corcoran, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Thomas J. Anderson, Chief Financial
Officer, of R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, LLC (“RJOFM”), the Managing Owner of
RJO Global Trust (the “Trust”), certify that, to my knowledge (i) the attached
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
attached Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Trust.




/s/
      Gerald
      Corcoran
                  
                  /s/
      Thomas
      J. AndersonGerald
      Corcoran
                  
                  Thomas
      J. AndersonChief
      Executive Officer
                  
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerR.
      J. O’Brien Fund Management, LLC, Managing Owner
                  
                  R.
      J. O’Brien Fund Management, LLC, Managing OwnerNovember
      12, 2010
                  
                  November
      12, 2010
2009-2280.

#### Cleveland v. State.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92663, 2009-Ohio-5968.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,641,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,220,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    604,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,860,400
<PP&E>                                         649,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,234,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,699,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,300
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,628,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,234,800
<SALES>                                      4,072,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,072,100
<CGS>                                        2,159,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,159,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                144,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   114,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 INVENT Ventures, Inc.  Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, James Jago, certify that:  1. I am the Chief Financial Officer of INVENT Ventures, Inc.  2. Attached to this certification is Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, a periodic report (the periodic report) filed by the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), which contains financial statements.  3 I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: · The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and · The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented.  April 15, 2014 /s/ James Jago James Jago Chief Financial Officer
| Mortgage        LoansJudgmentsSecuritiesOther AssetsEquity in Subs10.0%    5.0%10.0%35.0%40.0%
                      Source: Reports from FDIC Division of Finance

Back to Chart
 19951996199719981999Other4,111    4,7604,1503,9093,820Liquidation3,0551,8191,093795753    Supervision    2,6232,5722,5502,6552,693    RTC    2,067Total11,8569,1517,7937,3597,266

                      Source: FDIC, 1999 Annual Report

Back          to Chart |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EX-35.5
Wachovia Securities
201 South College Street
CP9
Charlotte, NC 28244-1075


(logo) WACHOVIA SECURITIES


1123 SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of April 1, 2007, by and among CWCapital Commercial Funding Corporation, as
Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital
Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series Cobalt 2007-C2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used
herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan and Marilyn Addison,
Managing Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of Compliance
Third Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   April 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, and of its performance per the Agreement
   during such period has been made under our supervision; and

2. To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer,
   has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the period April 1, 2007, through December 31, 2007;

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
10th day of March 2008.


/s/ Timothy Ryan
Timothy Ryan, Managing Director
Wachovia Bank National Association

/s/ Marilyn Addison
Marilyn Addison, Director
Wachovia Bank National Association
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier DE LA PENA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50450

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roberto L. Rodriguez, Law Offices of Roberto L. Rodriguez, Eagle Pass, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Javier De La Pena appeals the 92-month sentence imposed by the district court, on remand, following his jury-trial conviction for possession of and importation of cocaine. He argues that the district court’s consideration of facts that were neither admitted nor proven to a jury in calculating his guidelines sentence range violated the Sixth Amendment under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). As De La Pena was sentenced under an advisory guidelines scheme following the issuance of *Booker,*this argument is without merit. *See United States v. Johnson,*445 F.3d 793, 798 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2884, 165 L.Ed.2d 908 (2006).

De La Pena also argues that the district court’s drug quantity determination was erroneous because it was not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The district court adopted the factual findings and conclusions set forth in the presentence report (PSR). As the facts set forth in the PSR showed that De La Pena knew exactly where to go to purchase cocaine and *248that he did so, the inference that he bought more than he was commissioned to buy was permissible. *See United States v. Caldwell,*448 F.3d 287, 290 (5th Cir.2006). Other than his own self-serving assertions, De La Pena offered no evidence to rebut the findings contained in the PSR. De La Pena has thus failed to show that the district court clearly erred in determining drug quantity for sentencing purposes. *See United States v. De Jesus-Batres,*410 F.3d 154, 164 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1022, 163 L.Ed.2d 865 (2006); *United States v. Condono,*285 F.3d 348, 355 (5th Cir.2002); *United States v. Posada-Rios,*158 F.3d 832, 878 (5th Cir.1998).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 FSA Help
 Section Topics
     FSA Help Home
     Accessibility Statement
     Deadline Extensions for FSA Programs
     Information Quality
     Nondiscrimination Statement
     Policies & Links
     Privacy Policy
     Site Map
     Technical Assistance
 If you have FSA specific questions that you would like an expert to respond to, please submit them through Ask USDA. Site Map Click this link to view the Site map to see how content is arranged on the current FSA Web site. Technical Assistance Learn about how to receive technical assistance by clicking this link
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS