alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 00N-0505]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal Food or Feed; Animal 
Proteins Prohibited in Ruminant Feed

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Prohibited From Use in Animal Food 
or Feed; Animal Proteins Prohibited in Ruminant Feed'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Karen L. Nelson, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1482.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Tuesday, February 
22, 2000 (65 FR 8714), the agency announced that the proposed 
information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and 
clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, 
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now 
approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 
0910-0339. The approval expires on February 29, 2004.

    Dated: February 23, 2001.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-5075 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
EXHIBIT 23

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Pfizer Inc.:   We consent to the use of our reports dated February 24, 2005, with respect to  the consolidated balance sheets of Pfizer Inc. and Subsidiary Companies as of  December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income,  shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 2004, management's assessment of the effectiveness  of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the  effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,  2004, incorporated herein by reference and to the reference to our firm under  the heading "Experts" in the porspectus.

KPMG, LLP  New York, New York  March 1, 2005
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-161300 on Form S-3
and Registration Statement No. 333-153231 on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 25, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of GT Solar
International, Inc., and the effectiveness of GT Solar International Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
GT Solar International, Inc. for the year ended April 2, 2011.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
May 25, 2011

---



QuickLinks
# osha data modified comparison p
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ChasePackaging Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuantto Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

| August 13,  2008 | /s/ Ann C. W.  Green                             |   |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                  | Ann C. W. Green                                  |
|                  | Chief Financial  Officer and Assistant Secretary |

 

----
2010-0583.

#### In re C.C.

Cuyahoga App. No. 94011, 2010-Ohio-779. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon review of the appeal it appears that the case involves the termination of parental rights. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case shall proceed according to the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio governing the termination of parental rights or adoption of a minor child.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of DJO Finance LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on March 5, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Vickie L. Capps,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i) ThisReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 5, 2010                                        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                             |   |
| /s/  Vickie L. Capps                                             |   |
| Vickie  L. Capps                                                 |   |
| Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |

 

----
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000106112-SEP-201212:06 PM
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-320-034]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

January 3, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 22, 2000, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (``Koch'') filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(``Commission'') contracts between Koch and the following companies for 
disclosure of recently negotiated rate transactions. As shown on the 
contracts, Koch requests an effective date of January 1, 2001.

Special Negotiated Rate Between

Koch Gateway Pipeline and Mobile Energy LLC
Koch Gateway Pipeline and Koch Energy Trading Company

    Koch states that copies of the filing are being made available for 
public inspection during regular business hours in Koch's offices in 
Houston, Texas. In addition, Koch states that it has served copies of 
this filing upon all parties on the official service list created by 
the Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-522 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF APRIL 30, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                  10,897
<SECURITIES>                             2,009
<RECEIVABLES>                           11,761
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,303
<INVENTORY>                             16,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        49,194
<PP&E>                                 193,358
<DEPRECIATION>                          99,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         145,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   45,990
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                              57,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           145,407
<SALES>                                170,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       170,911
<CGS>                                  167,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          170,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (5,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (2,158)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (3,312)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,312)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.25)
        

</TABLE>
#### Abdulai SHERIFF, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73075.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 19, 2011.

Bakary Fansu Conteh, Esquire, Law Office of Bakary Fansu Conteh, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Mark Christopher Walters, Esquire, Assistant Director, Annette M. Wietecha, Esquire, Arthur L. Rabin, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, WWS-District Counsel, Esquire, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Abdulai Sheriff, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, *Sowe v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 1281, 1285 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal based upon changed country conditions because, even if Sheriff were credible and established past persecution, the record reflects that country conditions in Sierra Leone have changed such that Sheriff no longer has a well-founded fear of future persecution by members of the Revolutionary United Front. *See Sowe,*538 F.3d at 1286-1288.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief based on changed country conditions. *Id.*at 1288-89.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE FIRST
QUARTER 2000 10-Q OF INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC. AND  IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                              44,952
<SECURITIES>                                       445,678
<RECEIVABLES>                                       92,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        150,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   850,157
<PP&E>                                             565,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,961,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              314,486
<BONDS>                                            841,209
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               695
<OTHER-SE>                                         632,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,961,605
<SALES>                                            197,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   197,941
<CGS>                                              129,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      129,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19,722
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     11,788
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7,672
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         7,672
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .11


</TABLE>
941 A.2d 646

#### Antonio BUNDY, Appellant, v. Jeffrey BEARD, Secretary for the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Dec. 27, 2007.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2007, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
#### Caulton D. ALLEN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

Nos. 2010-3088, 2010-3178.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 27, 2011.

Caulton D. Allen, Fort Washington, MD, pro se.

Vincent D. Phillips, Sarah M. Bienkowski, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before LINN, Circuit Judge.

*356ON MOTION

ORDER

Caulton D. Allen moves to correct the record. The Department of Veterans Affairs opposes. Allen replies. Allen also moves to withdraw his previously filed motion to withdraw an issue raised in his opening brief. The Department responds.

In his first motion concerning the record, Allen seeks to add evidence that he asserts is not listed on the Merit Systems Protection Board’s certified list. The Department responds that one document, a petition for review, is included in documents listed on the certified list and that certain other documents were created after the Board’s initial decision. Allen replies that not all documents attached to the petition for review were included.

The court determines, without binding the merits panel to any determinations related to the merits of this case, that Allen may include with his brief any documents that he asserts were presented to the Board in this case. Additionally, any documents generated by the Board in this case, although issued after the Board’s initial decision, may be included with Allen’s brief. There is no need to “correct the record.”

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to correct the record is denied as unnecessary. Allen may include with his brief the documents he asserts were before the Board and documents that he asserts were generated by the Board. A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this case.

(2) The motion to withdraw the motion to withdraw arguments in his opening brief is granted. The motion to withdraw arguments is itself withdrawn.

(3)Any other pending motions are moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMA
               EXTRACTED FROM  THE QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT  TO SEC
               13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF 1934
               THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              6,078
<SECURITIES>                                       20,309
<RECEIVABLES>                                       9,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                          236
<INVENTORY>                                        11,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   47,567
<PP&E>                                              8,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (3,710)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     54,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              32,545
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               20
<OTHER-SE>                                         19,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       54,104
<SALES>                                            93,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   93,257
<CGS>                                              89,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     109,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (16,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (16,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (16,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.82)



</TABLE>
#### John D. BLACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEWARK, A Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-2196.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2007.

Decided: March 27, 2007.

John D. Black, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia M. Lewis, City of Newark Department of Law, Newark, New Jersey, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John D. Black seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order finding the deed he attempted to file to be a deficient filing. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Black seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL 12, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:       March 30, 2011





/s/ Paritosh K. ChoksiParitosh K. ChoksiDirector, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer andChief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC(Managing Member)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.