alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


	


        15 Inverness Way East

        

        Englewood, Colorado 80112

         

        +303 790 0600 Phone

         

        ihsmarkit.com 


	
 
	 	 
	 	 




July 14, 2020 


 


Mr. Todd Hyatt

c/o IHS Global Inc.

15 Inverness Way

East Englewood, CO 80112


 


Dear Mr. Hyatt:


 


I write to memorialize our discussions regarding anticipated
changes to your employment with IHS Global Inc. (the “Company”). Effective July 13, 2020, your new position and title
will be Special Advisor to the CEO. This is a part-time position in which we anticipate you will work at least 20 hours per week.
Your salary in this exempt role will be $35,568 per annum, subject to standard deductions and withholdings, and payable in accordance
with the Company’s standard payroll practices.


 


Should you achieve certain mutually agreed upon strategic goals,
with such goals to be decided between you and the Company no later than August 1, 2020, you will be eligible for a one-time lump
sum bonus of $1 million, less (1) any salary you have received between July 13, 2020 and the date of the achievement of the strategic
goals and (2) any required deductions and withholdings.


 


By your signature on this agreement, you are resigning from your
position as an officer of IHS Markit Ltd. and will no longer be considered an executive officer or a Section 16 officer of IHS
Markit Ltd. You will no longer be subject to any share ownership guidelines applicable to the IHS Markit executive team.


 


Except as modified herein, your employment remains subject to
the terms and conditions set forth in your employment letter dated October 31, 2013, as amended on July 8, 2016 and February 3,
2017 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”). You acknowledge that these changes to your position have been mutually
agreed upon and do not constitute “Good Reason” as that term is defined in the Employment Agreement. For the avoidance
of doubt, this change to your employment with the Company does not constitute a “Termination Date” as that term is
defined in the Employment Agreement.


 


Thank you for your significant contributions to the Company and
your continued engagement and execution in this new role.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ Ronnie West
	 	Ronnie West
	 	Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer 
	 	 
	 	 


	 	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Todd Hyatt
	 	Todd Hyatt
	 	Date:July 15, 2020



 


 


 




 


IHS
Global Inc.


15
Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Re: Morgan Stanley Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-2 (the "Trust"), Mortgage
  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2, issued pursuant to the Pooling
  and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2007, among Morgan Stanley
  ABS Capital I Inc., as Depositor, First NLC Financial Services, LLC, as
  Responsible Party, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
  Servicer, Securities Administrator and a Servicer, Saxon Mortgage
  Services, Inc., as a Servicer, Countrywide Home Loan Servicing LP, as a
  Servicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, Morgan
  Stanley Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2007-2

  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"), and
    all reports on Form 10-D (collectively with this Annual Report, the
    "Reports") required to be filed in respect of period covered by this
    Annual Report, of the Trust;

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
    any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
    with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this Annual Report is included in the Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria required to be
    included in this Annual Report in accordance with Item 1122 of
    Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
    included as an exhibit to this Annual Report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this Annual Report. Any material instances of
    non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    Annual Report.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, and Saxon Mortgage
    Services, Inc. as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1245 CA 16-00497 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

MARCIA WENTLAND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
E.A. GRANCHELLI DEVELOPERS, INC., AND K.M. TREATS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

BROWN CHIARI LLP, BUFFALO (DAVID W. OLSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICES OF DESTIN C. SANTACROSE, BUFFALO (LISA DIAZ-ORDAZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT E.A. GRANCHELLI DEVELOPERS, INC.
HAGELIN SPENCER LLC, BUFFALO (WILLIAM SWIFT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT K.M. TREATS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Frank Caruso, J.), entered January 22, 2016. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to set aside a verdict. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1372** 

METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v.
WALTER J. HOLLAND, JR. , Party

- in

- Interest/Defendant

– A ppe llant , and

DAVID W. MCKAUGHAN , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv
- 00690

- WMN )

Submitted : January 26, 2012 Dec ided: February 2, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Robert L. Siems, LAW FIRM OF ROBERT L. SIEMS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Stacey A. Moffet, Richard J. Berwanger, Jr., ECCLESTON & WOLF, P.C. , Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Walter J. Holland , Jr. appeals the district court ’ s
order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on its claim

for a declatory judgment . We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Metro

. Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co. v.

Holland , No. 1:10

- cv
- 00690

- WMN (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2011) . We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered August 16, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00841-CV

GUDAYE GOBEZIE, Appellant

V.

SANDRA CASTILLO AND JORGE VALERIANO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-03934

ORDER

The trial court has found appellant indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i). Accordingly, 

we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre and Tenesa Shaw, Official Court Reporter 

of the 192nd Judicial District Court, to file the appellate record without advance payment of costs. 

See id. 20.1(k). The record shall be filed no later than August 23, 2016.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre, Ms. Shaw, 

and the parties.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.2

              CONSENT OF SNC-LAVALIN ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS INC.

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 40-F) of Crystallex International Corporation (the "Company") of
references to and a summary of (i) the feasibility study completed by us and
other independent consultants in September 2003 entitled "Las Cristinas Project,
Feasibility Study, September 2003 (20,000 t/d Feasibility Study)" and (ii) the
development plan completed by us and other independent consultants in August
2005 entitled "Development Plan--2005, Update to the Feasibility Study Issued
September 2003 (Development Plan)" (collectively, the "Incorporated
Information"), included in the Annual Information Form for the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

         We also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the
Incorporated Information into all of the Company's outstanding registration
statements on Forms F-2, F-3, F-10 and S-8 that have been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

         The work and/or services described in the following sections of (i) and
(ii) above were performed, and the opinions in respect thereof are expressed, by
others and edited by us for consistency of format only:

         1.1 Geology and resources (including mineral resource estimates based
         on estimates performed by the Company);

         1.2 Open Pit mine design;

         1.3 Metallurgical test work;

         1.4 Geotechnical test work;

         1.5 Environmental baseline data field work;

         1.6 General and Administration costs for the operating cost estimate;
         and

         1.7 Owner's costs input for the capital cost estimate.

         We have not taken any steps to audit or confirm such information and,
as such, we express no opinions in respect of these matters.


         Dated this 30th day of March, 2007.


                                                    SNC-LAVALIN ENGINEERS &
                                                    CONSTRUCTORS INC.

                                                    /s/ SNC-LAVALIN ENGINEERS
                                                    & CONSTRUCTORS INC.
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Authorized Signatory
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dale McCourtney HODGE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-7644.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 22, 2007.

Decided: March 2, 2007.

James Orlando Broccoletti, Zoby & Broccoletti, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dale McCourtney Hodge seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hodge has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2690 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2690

            Relating to the tariff treatment of Benthiocarb.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1993

  Mr. Fazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            Relating to the tariff treatment of Benthiocarb.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENTHIOCARB.

    Chapter 29 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
is amended by striking out subheading 2930.90.10 and inserting the 
following new subheadings and superior heading thereto with the 
superior heading having the same degree of indentation as the superior 
heading to subheadings 2930.90.24 and 2930.90.28:

``                  Pesticides:                                                                                 
    2930.90.11       S-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-N,N-diethyl-                        Free (A*, CA,    15.4 cents/kg+6    
                      thiolcarbamate (Benthiocarb).......  6.8%              E, IL, J)        4.5%              
    2930.90.13       Other...............................  12.5%            Free (A*, CA,    15.4 cents/kg+6    
                                                                             E, IL, J)        4.5%            ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1988; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been a lower duty if the 
amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or withdrawal, 
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
#### Gunter *et al. v.*Smith.

Submitted March 2,

Decided March 25, 1901.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Reese. Hart superior court. March 19, 1900.

*I. G. Van Duzer, P. P. Proffitt,*and *A. G. McGurry,*for plaintiffs.

*J. S. Skelton,*for defendant.

Cobb, J.

1. There is in this State no statute of limitations applicable to an action for the recovery of land. *Pollard*v. *Tait,*38 *Ga.*439 (2); *Johnson*v. Neal, 67 *Ga.*528.

2. If in an action for the recovery of land it appears upon the face of the petition that the defendant has acquired a prescriptive title to the land in controversy, as against the plaintiff, such defect in the plaintiff’s case may be taken advantage of by demurrer.

3. If the grantee in a security deed goes into possession of the land thereby conveyed under no other claim than such a deed, he is in possession simply for the purpose of applying the rents, issues, and profits to the satisfaction of his debt, and'when the net amount received by him from the proceeds of the land is equal to or greater than the amount of his debt, his right of possession ceases, and the grantor, or his legal representatives, and if none, his heirs, may bring an action to recover the land. *Polhill*v. Brown, 84 *Ga.*338, 339 (10). The foregoing principle is especially applicable in a case where there was a distinct agreement between the grantee and the heirs of the grantor that possession was to be given for the purpose only of paying the debt out of the rents, issues, and profits.

4. Where the grantee in a security deed enters into possession of the property conveyed by such deed, the right of the grantor to redeem by the payment of the debt is never barred so long as the grantee recognizes a right to redeem, and equity would by analogy decree that the right to redeem would in no event be lost until after the expiration of ten years from the date of the last recognition by the grantee of the right to redeem. Civil Code, §2734.

6. The petition in the present case set forth a cause of action, and was not subject to any of .the objections set up in the demurrer.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
2009-1420.

#### ComDoc v. Advance Print Copy Ship Ctr.

Summit App. No. 24212, 2009-Ohio-2998. Reported at 123 Ohio St.3d 1495, 2009-Ohio-6015, 916 N.E.2d 1074. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pressure BioSciences,Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the  “Report”),  I, Richard T. Schumacher, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

 

(1)                                  The Report of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 22, 2004 |                                                           | */s/ Richard T. Schumacher* |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                           | Richard  T. Schumacher                                         |
|                           | President,  Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer              |
|                           | (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by PressureBioSciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 99.1**




**AGGREGATE
      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**


Class
              Interest
              Principal
              Losses
              Ending
                  BalanceA1
              2,260,041.81
              6,373,512.57
              -
              58,032,737.44A2
              599,976.53
              -
              -
              58,032,737.44A3
              3,877,223.61
              12,440,873.86
              -
              90,580,126.13A4
              329,600.00
              -
              -
              8,240,000.00A5
              969,864.54
              3,620,783.81
              -
              23,379,216.18A6
              35,012.83
              -
              -
              23,379,216.18A7
              1,026,469.60
              3,058,880.00
              -
              23,941,120.00A8
              578,310.00
              -
              -
              14,457,750.00A9
              156,600.00
              -
              -
              3,915,000.00A10
              383,400.00
              -
              -
              9,585,000.00APO
              -
              45,015.59
              -
              2,206,824.09AR
              1.08
              100.00
              -
              -B1
              308,821.13
              31,019.79
              -
              7,393,980.20B2
              108,638.49
              10,912.29
              -
              2,601,087.72B3
              80,064.74
              8,042.17
              -
              1,916,957.83B4
              51,490.98
              5,172.06
              -
              1,232,827.94B5
              40,011.58
              4,019.00
              -
              957,981.00B6
              40,064.36
              4,024.28
              -
              959,244.72