alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: David Ghazvini v. Mr. Paul N. Jones, General Counsel, Mr. Andres Alcantar, Ms. Hope Andrade, Mr

. Ronald Congelton, Texas

Wor k force Commission and San Jacinto Community College

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00367

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 07448

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

On May 27, 2016, this Court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due. On May 31, 2016, appellant filed an affidavit of indigence in this Court. We forwarded the affidavit to

the trial court for determination. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(h)(4). On June 10, 2016, this Court advised appellant that the Harris County District Cl erk advised us that appellant had not made financial arrangements for the filing of the clerk’s record.

A contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence was filed by the Harris County District Clerk. After a hearing, the trial court sustained the contest on June 21, 2016. No notice of appeal of this order and no motion seeking review of this order have been filed. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 20.1(j)(1)

- (2). Accordingly, appellant is responsible for payment of the filing fee and for payment for the clerk’s reco rd. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 (party not excused from paying costs must pay whatever fees required by statute or Supreme Court order).

We order appellant to pay or provide proof of payment of the filing fee and for the

clerk’s record on or before September 6, 2016 or the court will dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 35.3(c), 3 7 .3 (a),(b) (court may dismiss the appeal for nonpayment for clerk’s record after giving appellant reasonable opportunity to cure nonpayment), 42.3 (court may dismiss for failure to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order or notice requiring a response or actions within a specified time).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually

Date: August 11, 2016
EXHIBIT
32.1
  
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Information Systems Associates,
Inc.. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 (the “Report”), I, Joseph P.
Coschera, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  1) The
Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the Company's financial position and results of operations.
  
 February
26, 2009
 
 /s/Joseph P. Coschera
 Joseph P.
Coschera
  Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on E-Commerce will                               ( print page 13509)                            meet in closed session on March 28, 2001; April 25-26, 2001; May 1-2, 2001; June 5-6, 2001; June 26-27, 2001; and July 24-25, 2001, at SAIC, Inc., 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. This Task Force will review the DoD's current implementation status of a e-commerce tools and make any appropriate recommendations that might enhance opportunities for cost reduction, capital and manpower efficiency.                    

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review and evaluate the Department's new procurement approaches and its current implementation status in light of the fact that the Department has one of the largest acquisition systems in the world for both goods and services.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: February 28, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-5389  Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          59,640
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,600
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                41,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    493,542
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          35,135
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            35,111
<LOANS>                                        564,867
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,244,698
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,085,039
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,158
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,786
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,102
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,244,698
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,843
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               14,567
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,263
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                42,673
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,088
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,227
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           31,446
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,505
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,605
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,605
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.69
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,568
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,688
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,489
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,901
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      863
<RECOVERIES>                                       602
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,640
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,640
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            169


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed statement of financial condition and the consolidated
statements of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,052,521
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,553,091
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,055,732
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       8,116,997
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         8,084,195
<LOANS>                                     89,815,063
<ALLOWANCE>                                    597,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,537,896
<DEPOSITS>                                  98,994,488
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,604,223
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            168,450
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,979,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,547
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,723,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             121,537,896
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,616,717
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              278,751
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                54,636
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,950,104
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             787,216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             873,826
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,076,278
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   18,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             125,564
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                859,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                398,285
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     398,285
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   261,382
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.74
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,914
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               581,437
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,578
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              597,859
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           582,890
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         14,969


</TABLE>
#### Beysiegel *et al. v.*Rome Mutual Loan Association.

Argued June 24,

Decided July 23, 1901.

Injunction. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. March 30, 1901.

*G. A. JET. Harris & Son*and *JR. L. Ghamlee,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Halsted Smith,*contra.

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. An injunction should not be granted when the plaintiff in the petition therefor has a complete and adequate remedy at law.

2. The defendant in error in the present case had such a remedy by claim, the successful prosecution of which would, for all essential purposes, have been as effectual as the equitable proceeding; nor was this proceeding maintainable on the theory that it was necessary to prevent a multiplicity of suits.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for GSI Commerce, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 29, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"). I, Michael G. Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                            By:  /s/ Michael G. Rubin
                                               ----------------------------
                                            Michael G. Rubin
                                            Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2002