alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 30, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative                           ( print page 13970)                        Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interoperability Consortium, Inc. (the “Corporation”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Visa International, Foster City, CA has left the Corporation.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interoperability Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On January 13, 2000, Interoperability Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2000 (65 FR 38596).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 20, 2000. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55284).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-5720  Filed 3-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1932
SHERRY WHITE-BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; NORFOLK CITY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE; GEORGE SCHAEFER; NORFOLK ELECTORAL BOARD, Defendants - Appellees,

-------------------------------------------------- ELISA LONG, General Registrar of the City of Norfolk; EILEEN M. ADDISON, Movants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-897-2) Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: Dec ember 20, 2005 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Sherry White-Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Edward Heretick, FIRST VIRGINIA BANK BUILDING, Portsmouth, Virginia; Robert Bryan Rigney, A. Christopher Zaleski, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Sherry White-Battle appeals the district court’s order denying her second motion to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia , No. CA-03-897-2 (E.D. Va. July 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.1





March 25, 2002





Mr. Alex Yemenidjian


c/o Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc.


2500 Broadway Street


Santa Monica, CA 90404





Dear Mr. Yemenidjian:





Kindly refer to the
Employment Agreement dated as of April 28, 1999 (the Employment Agreement) between you (Executive) and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (the Company).





Effective as of the date hereof, the Company and Executive mutually agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:





1. The term of the Employment Agreement is hereby extended so that it will now expire April 30, 2007.





The word Term as used in the Employment Agreement shall be deemed to include the term as hereby extended.





2. Except as herein specifically provided, the Employment Agreement shall not be amended in any respect whatsoever and shall continue
in full force and effect.





If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding and agreement, please so indicate by
signing in the place for your signature below.





| | Ve | ry truly yours,
| | -- | ---------------




METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER INC.By:

/s/    WILLIAM A. JONESWilliam A. Jones Senior Executive
Vice President














AGREED:








/S/    ALEX YEMENIDJIANAlex Yemenidjian
Exhibit 32.1


 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------


I, Michael C. Culver, as Chief Executive Officer of First Aviation Services
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

(1)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
     period ended July 31, 2004 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S. Securities
     and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 14, 2004


                                                     /s/ Michael C. Culver
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Michael C. Culver
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2941 

To improve the Cooperative Observer Program of the National Weather 

Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2018 

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To improve the Cooperative Observer Program of the 

National Weather Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening the Co5 operative Observer Program Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO COOPERATIVE OBSERVER PRO7 GRAM OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of Com9 merce for Oceans and Atmosphere, acting through the NaVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:00 Jun 04, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2941.IS S2941

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2941 IS

1 tional Weather Service, shall improve the Cooperative Ob2 server Program by— 

3 (1) providing support to— 

4 (A) State-coordinated programs relating to 

5 the Program; and 

6 (B) States and regions where observations 

7 provided through the Program are scarce; 

8 (2) working with State weather service head9 quarters to increase participation in the Program 

10 and to add stations in States and regions described 

11 in paragraph (1)(B); 

12 (3) where feasible, ensuring that data streams 

13 from stations that have been contributing data to 

14 the Program for more than 50 years are maintained 

15 and continually staffed by volunteers; 

16 (4) prioritizing the recruitment of new volun17 teers for the Program; 

18 (5) ensuring that opportunities exist for auto19 mated reporting to lessen the burden on volunteers 

20 to collect and report data by hand; and 

21 (6) ensuring that integrated reporting is avail22 able for qualitative observations that cannot be auto23 mated, such as snow observations and hazardous 

24 weather events, to ensure that volunteers in the ProVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:00 Jun 04, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2941.IS S2941

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2941 IS

1 gram can report and upload observations quickly 

2 and easily. 

3 (b) COORDINATION WITH STATES AND REGIONS.— 

4 Not less frequently than every 180 days, the National 

5 Weather Service shall coordinate with State and regional 

6 offices with respect to the status of Cooperative Observer 

7 Program stations. 

8 (c) COORDINATION WITH FEDERAL AGENCIES.—The 

9 National Weather Service shall coordinate with other Fed10 eral agencies, including the Forest Service, the Depart11 ment of Agriculture, and the United States Geological 

12 Survey, to leverage opportunities to grow the Cooperative 

13 Observer Program network and to more effectively use ex14 isting infrastructure, weather stations, and staff of the 

15 Program. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Gladys Laverdi et al., Appellants, v Arona S. Baker et al., Respondents.

[3 NYS3d 680]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered November 13, 2013 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendants for an open commission and letters rogatory for the deposition of Kathryn R. Wilkins, M.D., a nonparty witness.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present — Peradotto, J.P., Carni, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
#### William B. ROOZ, petitioner, v. Roberta KIMMEL.

No. 08-1157.

May 18, 2009.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
-

Student Handout- Module Number Twenty-Three (23) - Process Verification and 

Assessment 

Process Verification and Assessment 

As part of evaluating the adequacy of the establishment’s Food Safety system, the EIAO/CSIs 

will be reviewing/observing parts of the system. 

EIAOs follows instructions/FSA methodology in FSIS Directive 5100.1. 

This is general technique for how to perform an FSA in a canning establishment and what CSIs 

should do upon being assigned to canning establishment. After the EIAO meets with 

management, he/she should request the 60 days of production records prior to conducting the 

walkthrough. 

The EIAO/CSI should review the HACCP system to prepare for the tour. 

The EIAO should amend observations or do addendums to observations before he/she leaves 

(the establishment may have made corrections before the FSA is complete). 

The best way to familiarize yourself with thermal processing is to follow the process from start to 

finish. Ask the establishment management questions during the walk through. 

During the initial or entrance meeting, the EIAO or CSI should ask management how the 

establishment handles process deviations and abnormal containers incidents and the location of

the processing deviation file. 

Stopwatch for continuous retort reel timing and hydrostat chain timing. Accurate thermometer 

for CF measurements. Caliper for measuring outside pipe diameter. Dividers to confirm process 

timing on recording charts. A method to test sanitizers. 

Reminders: CSIs and EIAO cannot physically do can seam teardowns or go into 

confined spaces. 

In addition to the specific instructions in FSIS Directive 5100.1, it’s a good idea to: 

Pick a product line and review/evaluate a couple of retorts if it appears they are all plumbed the 

same. Do not try and evaluate each retort system if more than one being used for meat and 

poultry products. Pick one retort system for the FSA. For instance, if the establishment has 

hydrostat, continuous rotary and still retorts choose only one system. If time permits, choose 

and additional type of retorting system. 

Four basic areas of concern: 

Note: The CSI verifies these during each HACCP verification task. 

Establishment of the process

Delivery of the process 

Documentation of the process 

Container integrity
#### Cone Export and Commission Company *v.*McCalla.

Submitted March 2,

Decided March 25, 1901.

Certiorari. Before Judge Reese. Elbert superior court. April 13, 1900.

*Z. B. Rogers,*for plaintiff. *J. N. Worley,*for defendants.

Fish, J.

1. Under the Civil Code, § 5662, a second affidavit of illegality is not maintainable if based upon “ causes which existed and were known, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence might have been known at the time of filing the first.”

2. It necessarily follows that when, upon the trial of the issue formed by the filing of a second affidavit of illegality, the affiant testified : “All the grounds in this second affidavit were really known to me at the filing of my first affidavit, but I did not know that they ought to be put in,” a verdict could not lawfully be rendered in his favor.

3. The court in the present case erred in overruling the certiorari, but ought.to have sustained the same; and inasmuch as the correction of the errors of law committed in the magistrate’s court would have finally governed the case, and there was no question of fact rendering it necessary to send it back for a new hearing in the justice’s court, final judgment should in the superior court have been rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in certiorari. Civil Code, § 4652.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                August 13, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0609


     Re: Brunner Income Properties, L.P.I. (the "Issuer")


Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This cover letter is submitted to comply with the written statement
requirement of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002").

     The undersigned, who are the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer of the Issuer, each hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge the accompanying Form 10-QSB of the Issuer fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.


                                        Very truly yours,



                                        /s/ James M. Hull
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer

\

                                        /s/ Deborah Mosely
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Jeffrey ANDERSON, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 10-6290.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 12, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 27, 2011.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, David T. Huband, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Anderson appeals the district court’s order finding that he continues to satisfy the criteria for commitment set forth at 18 U.S.C. §. 4246(a) (2006) and continuing his commitment to the custody of the Attorney General. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district *703court did not clearly err in its determination that Anderson continues to suffer “from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another.” *See*18 U.S.C. § 4246(a); *United States v. Cox,*964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir.1992) (stating standard of review). We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Order entered August 9 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 016 66
- CR No. 05
- 12
- 016 67
- CR
ERASMO GARCIA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, T exas Trial Court Cause No s . F1 1
- 58343
- Y , F1 0
- 61584
- Y



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On July 8, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desi res to pursue the appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and is represented by court

- appointed counsel Nanette Hendrickson; (3) Ms. Hendrickson’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and (4) Ms. Hendrickson requested thirty da ys from the August 6, 2013 hearing to file appellant’s brief.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 . Because counsel has already been granted one extension and the brief is now two months overdue, no furtherextensions will be granted. If the brief is not filed by the date specified, we will order Nanette

Hendrickson and the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office removed as counsel and will order the trial court to appoint a new attorney to represent appellant in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Michael Snipes, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Katherine Drew, Appellate

- Chief, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; Nanette Hendrickson, Dallas Count y Public Defender’s Office; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
### **EXHIBIT 32.01**

### **SECTION 1350CERTIFICATION**

I, Gerald Corcoran, Chief Executive Officer and I, HelenD. McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer of R. J. O’Brien Fund Management Inc. (“RJOFM”),the Managing Owner of JWH Global Trust (the “Trust”), certify that (i) theattached Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin the attached Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| /s/ Gerald Corcoran                |   | /s/ Helen D. McCarthy              |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Gerald Corcoran                         |   | Helen D. McCarthy                       |
| Chief Executive Officer                 |   | Chief Financial Officer                 |
| R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, Inc. |   | R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, Inc. |
| May 17, 2007                       |   | May 17, 2007                       |

 

----
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*March 12, 2010*

[Cite as *03/12/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-919.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2009-2298.

#### In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 08-917-EL-SSO. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene as appellee of the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.
Exhibit
      32.02





Certification





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form
      10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              February 14, 2007By:
            /s/
                James McDadeJames
                McDade
              Chief
                  Financial Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code).
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131146 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131146 

 COA: 265467 
 Wayne CC: 97-000792-01

LENWARD HAMPTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk