alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
iliiill 

Peer Review Plan 

Title of Review: Peer Review: [ X] Influential Scientific Information 

Quantitative Microbial Risk 

Assessment of Salmonella in 

Chicken Products 

Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture, [ ] Highly Influential Scientific Assessment 

Food Safety and Inspection Service 

(USDA/FSIS) 

Agency Contact: Dr. Joanna Zablotsky Kufel, Director, Risk Assessment and Analytics Staff, Office of Public Health 

Science, USDA/FSIS 

Subject of Review: Independent peer review of the FSIS Risk Assessments for Salmonella in Chicken Products Linked to 

Foodborne Illness 

Purpose of Review: Peer review of the methodology, supporting data, modeling and data analysis, and findings from the 

FSIS risk assessment for Salmonella on chicken and in chicken products. 

Type of Review: [ ] Panel Review [X ] Individual Reviewers 

[ ] Alternative Process (Briefly Explain): 

Timing of Review (Est.): Start: February 2023 End: Ma rch 2023 Completed: 

Number of Reviewers: [ ] 3 or less [X ] 4 to 10 [ ] More than 10 

Primary Disciplines/Types of Expertise Needed for Review: Quantitative microbiological risk assessment/dose-response 

modeling, Salmonella in chicken, poultry (chicken) science, food microbiology/predictive microbiology, genomics of 

Salmonella/epidemiology 

Reviewers selected by: [ ] Agency [ X ] Designated Outside Organization 

Organization’s Name: RTI International 

Opportunities for Public Comment? [X ] Yes [ ] No 

If yes, briefly state how and when these opportunities will be provided: 

How: Through the public comment period available with publication of new regulations in the Federal Register 

When: Summer 2023 

Peer Reviewers Provided with Public Comments? [ ] Yes [ X ] No 

Public Nominations Requested for Review Panel? [ ] Yes [X ] No 

Other:
Exhibit 10.31


 


Amendment to the convertible loan agreement
dated October 24, 2019 


 


between


 


Mr. Dietmar Hopp, Johann-Jakob-Astor-Str.
  57, 69190 Walldorf


also referred to as the lender


 


and


 


CureVac AG, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 15,
72076


also referred to as the "borrower"


 


Preliminary remark 


 


The Borrower intends to conduct a financing round in the short
term and subsequently, after a restructuring process in which all shares of CureVac AG will be contributed to a Dutch company (CureVac
NV), to conduct an initial public offering on the Nasdaq. The Borrower must maintain liquidity of at least EUR 60 million in preparation
for the IPO.  


 


Although the conditions for disbursement according to section
1.2 of the convertible loan are not fulfilled, the lender is prepared to make the necessary funds available on condition that the
lender is free to decide whether the loan is to be repaid or exchanged for shares in the borrower.


 


That being said, the parties agree on the following:


 


		1.	Loan tranches pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Convertible Loan may be drawn down regardless of whether the cash balance of the
Borrower falls below 15 million Euro.



 


		2.	If the Lender terminates the Convertible Loan pursuant to Section 4.2 (i) or the Borrower terminates the Convertible Loan pursuant
to Section 4.4, CureVac is entitled and - if sufficient liquid funds are available - obliged to repay the Convertible Loan within
4 weeks.  



 


		3.	The other provisions of the convertible loan remain unchanged.



 


	/s/Dietmar Hopp	 	/s/ Curevac AG
	Dietmar Hopp	 	CureVac AG
	 	 	June 25, 2020
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*May 14, 2010*

[Cite as *05/14/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-2110.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2010-0768.

#### US Bank, NA v. Suggs.

Cuyahoga App. No. 94537. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2822

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on Tazobactam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1993

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on Tazobactam.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BETA LACTAMASE INHIBITOR (TAZOBACTAM).

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 Tazobactam and

its sodium salt,

in bulk or put

up in measured

doses (CAS Nos.

89786–04–9 and

89785–84–2)

(provided for in

subheadings

2941.10.50 and

3004.10.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•HR 2822 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn

4 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec7 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

8 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro9 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

10 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

11 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend12 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

13 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

14 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en15 actment of this Act;

16 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

17 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

18 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

19 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

20 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERARDO GARCIA

- ORTIZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 72388

Agency No. A034

- 614

- 679

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2023 * *

Pasadena, California

Before: WATFORD, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

e xcept as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 13 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSPage 2 of 2

Gerardo Garcia

- Ortiz petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) order denying as untimely his motion to reconsider and remand

proceedings. We deny the petition.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in holding that

, whether considered a

motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider

, Garcia

- Ortiz’s motion was untimely as

he filed it nearly seven years after the underlying BIA decision and failed to

demonstrate that an applicable exception applied. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(B)

(30

- day deadli ne for motions to reconsider); § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (90

- day deadline

for motions to reopen).

Garcia

- Ortiz argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Pereira v.

Sessions , 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), warrants equitable tolling. But that case has no

application here. A Notice to Appear need not contain the date, place, and time of

the hearing to vest jurisdiction with the immigration court. See United States v.

Bastide

- Hernandez , 39 F.4th 1187, 1188 (9th Cir. 2022) (en banc); Aguilar

Fermin v. Barr , 958 F.3d 887, 889 (9th Cir. 2020). Nor does the stop

- time rule at

issue in Pereira have any bearing on this case for it is undisputed that Garcia

- Ortiz

was statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ERNEST TYRE MOORE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1751

)

STATE OF FLORIDA )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 3, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Christopher C.

Sabella, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Keith W. Upson, Special Assistant

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, and Michael

Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 273

To deem the Florida Panther to be an endangered species under the

Endangered Species Act of 1973.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. SHAW, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr. GOSS, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, and Mr.

STEARNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To deem the Florida Panther to be an endangered species

under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FLORIDA PANTHER DECLARED ENDANGERED

4 SPECIES.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the spe6 cies commonly known as the ‘‘Florida Panther’’ is deemed

7 to be an endangered species for purposes of the Endan8 gered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531).
2

•H273 IH

1 SEC. 2. LISTING OF FLORIDA PANTHER.

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec3 retary of the Interior shall include the species known as

4 the ‘‘Florida Panther’’ in the list published under section

5 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C.

6 1533(d)).

Æ
2010-0003.

#### State ex rel. N. Canton v. Bd. of Commrs. of Stark Cty.

Stark App. No. 2009-CA-00132, 2009-Ohio-6942. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted.

O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,148
<INVENTORY>                                     31,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,529
<PP&E>                                          86,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,327
<BONDS>                                        142,766
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,475
<SALES>                                         66,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,757
<CGS>                                           49,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD07-00-135] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the Memorial bridge across the Intracoastal Waterway, mile 830.6, Volusia County, Daytona Beach, Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge owner or operator to only open a single leaf, from January 8, 2001, to January 19, 2001. This temporary deviation is required to allow the bridge owner to safely complete repairs of the bridge. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective from January 8, 2001, to January 19, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-6743. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Memorial bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Volusia County, Daytona Beach, is a double leaf bridge with a vertical clearance of 21 feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the fenders in the closed position with a horizontal clearance of 90 feet. On November 28, 2000, Sieg and Ambachtsheer, Inc., contractors representing the drawbridge owner, requested a deviation from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.5 which requires drawbridges to open promptly and fully when a request to open is given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary repairs to the drawbridge in a critical, time-sensitive manner. 

The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.5 for the purpose of repair completion of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Memorial Bridge need only open one leaf from January 8, 2001 until January 19, 2001. The deviation is effective beginning January 8, 2001, to January 19, 2001. 

Dated: December 21, 2000.

Greg E. Shapley, 

Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 01-547 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2801 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2801

           To suspend temporarily the duty on acid violet 19.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 1993

  Mr. Shays introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on acid violet 19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
      

``  9902.37.05  Acid violet 19 (CAS No.                    No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                 3244-88-0) (provided                                                         31/95           ''
                 for in subheading                                                                             .
                 3707.90.30)............  Free                                                                  

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
2009-1139.

#### State v. Echeverria.

Lucas App. No. L-07-1321, 2009-Ohio-2285.
2010-0593.

#### Wilson v. State.

Hamilton App. No. C-090190. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Simons, Appellant.

[5 NYS3d 377]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J.), rendered August 17, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the second degree and three counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 40 years to life, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the sentence *409on the weapon conviction to 3V2 to 7 years, and the sentences on each grand larceny conviction to 2 to 4 years, and substitute second felony offender adjudications as to those convictions in place of persistent violent felony offender adjudications, and, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to run all sentences concurrently, resulting in an aggregate term of 20 years to life, and otherwise affirmed.

We reject defendant’s argument that the verdicts convicting him of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree were against the weight of the evidence with respect to the dangerous instrument element required for each of those charges *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The victim testified that defendant used a pen knife to cut him on his ears, neck, and body, that defendant then jabbed him with scissors, stabbed him with a syringe, and repeatedly threatened to kill him if he did not cooperate during the incident. This evidence established the element of use or threatened use of a dangerous instrument element required for each charge *(see People v Davila,*37 AD3d 305 [1st Dept 2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 842 [2007]), as that element is defined in Penal Law § 10.00 (13). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Moreover, the victim’s testimony was largely corroborated by photographs and medical evidence regarding his injuries.

Furthermore, the court properly declined to submit lesser included offenses not requiring the dangerous instrument element. There was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, that he committed the corresponding greater offenses without wielding at least one object that qualified as a dangerous instrument under the statutory definition and the facts presented (see *People v James,*11 NY3d 886, 888 [2008]).

As the People concede, defendant was improperly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender on his convictions of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, since these crimes are not violent felony offenses. Accordingly, the sentences on those convictions are reduced as indicated. We also find the aggregate sentence to be excessive to the extent indicated.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          17,386
<SECURITIES>                                    46,856
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                       535
<INVENTORY>                                     14,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,136
<PP&E>                                           3,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,806
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,062
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,714
<SALES>                                         28,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,244
<CGS>                                           14,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,061
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,001
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,001
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euramax International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 25, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, J. David Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial position and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   J. David Smith            |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| J. David Smith                       |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 9, 2004                  |

 

----