alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

t1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147913

FAY LATTURE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147913

COA: 304833 

Genesee CC: 07-086680-NZ

LARRY EMMERLING,

Defendant, 

and

REBECCA FREIFELD,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

JULIE KEYES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DIANE REED,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

  Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C2 (the "Trust")
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C2

  I, Jeffrey A. Altabef, a Vice President of Credit Suisse First Boston
  Mortgage Securities Corp., the depositor into the above-referenced Trust,
  certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Centerline Servicing Inc., First American Commercial Real Estate Services,
    Inc., Global Realty Outsourcing, Inc., ING Clarion Partners, LLC, J.E.
    Robert Company, Inc., KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc., Midland
    Loan Services, Inc., Wachovia Bank, National Association and Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Jeffrey A. Altabef
    Signature

    Vice President
    (Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Muhammad Aamir SHEIKH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74942.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

Law Office of Kanwal Singh, Modesto, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark L. Gross, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Muhammad Aamir Sheikh, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applica*675tion for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Li v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Sheikh did not present credible testimony regarding his involvement with the Pakistan People’s Party Human Rights Cell. *See Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001). The BIA pointed to material inconsistencies between the testimony and a letter allegedly written by a doctor who treated Sheikh after his detention. *See id.*Because the letter from Dr. Ahmed was submitted to corroborate the alleged acts of persecution that Sheikh endured, it was central to Sheikh’s claim and supports the BIA’s conclusion that Sheikh was not credible. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir.2004) (concluding that documents with questionable genuineness that go to the heart of the claim may justify adverse credibility finding).

In the absence of credible evidence, Sheikh has failed to show eligibility for asylum or withholding. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). Because Sheikh’s claim under the CAT is based on the same facts that the BIA found to be not credible, and Sheikh points to no other evidence that the BIA should have considered, he has failed to establish eligibility for relief under the CAT. *See id.*at 1157.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Randall E. Meyer, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southwest
Bancorporation of Texas, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dated: August 9, 2004 /s/ Randall E. MeyerRandall E. Meyer
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
#### Tomas NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. INS, Respondent.

No. 05-2820-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 28, 2007.

Tomas Nunez, pro se, Newburgh, NY, for Petitioner.

*58Terrance P. Flynn, United States Attorney for the Western District of New York, Gail Y. Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Buffalo, NY, for Respondent.

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges, COLLEEN McMAHON,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Colleen McMahon, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, proceedings below, prior proceedings in this court, and specification of issues on appeal.

Petitioner Tomas Nunez, a native and citizen of Honduras, seeks review of a February 9, 2004, BIA order affirming the December 4, 2002, order of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Phillip J. Montante, denying petitioner’s application for discretionary relief from deportation under former Section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. *In re Tomas Nunez,*No. [ A XX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. February 9, 2004), *aff'g*No. [ A XX XXX XXX ] (Immig.Ct.Buffalo, Dec. 4, 2002).

Nunez previously requested review of the same order, and we dismissed his petition for lack of jurisdiction because he had committed an aggravated felony. *See Nunez v. INS,*No. 04-0818-ag (2d Cir. Nov. 1, 2004). Even assuming that our review is not barred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(2) (precluding review under most circumstances where another court has determined the validity of the order) or by principles of claim or issue preclusion, we must deny this petition. Although a preliminary question arises as to whether Nunez fairly exhausted his argument that his conviction for first degree sexual abuse was not an aggravated felony, even if we were to resolve that exhaustion issue in his favor, the argument itself is plainly without merit. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A). Further, we generally lack jurisdiction to review a discretionary denial of § 212(c) relief. *See Avendano-Espejo v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec.,*448 F.3d 503, 505 (2d Cir.2006). In order for us to exercise jurisdiction over a Section 212(c) denial, the petition must present a constitutional or legal question. *See Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Dep’t of Justice,*471 F.3d 315, 322 (2d Cir.2006). The only cognizable legal question that Nunez raises — that his deportation is barred by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights- — presents exhaustion issues but, in any event, lacks merit. *See Guaylupo-Moya v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 121, 136-37 (2d Cir.2005).

We have considered Nunez’s remaining arguments and found that they either are outside our jurisdiction or lack merit. We therefore deny review and vacate the stay of removal previously granted in this matter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,360,713
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,006,584
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     33,010,525
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                        186,994,142
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,096,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,010,132
<DEPOSITS>                                     168,941,078
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,502,335
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,666,748
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            29,095
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,870,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 238,010,132
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,639,875
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,709,536
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                         0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,349,431
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,048,311
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,196,699
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,152,732
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      747,578
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,975,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,651,190
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,651,190
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,545,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.95
<LOANS-NON>                                        339,168
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     10,231
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,351,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       37,625
<RECOVERIES>                                        35,349
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,096,611
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,096,611
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0
                                            

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-158097 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-144315 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 23, 2011 relating to the financial statements of Gulfstream Natural GasSystem, L.L.C. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spectra Energy Partners, LP for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Houston, Texas 

February 28, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Laura Buss Sayavedra, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner
of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.



|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Laura Buss Sayavedra                                                                                                                                                                             
|                   |  | Laura Buss Sayavedra Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC General
Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
|                  
|                  
|                  
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

JOY JACOBS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 112 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

          I,Richard B. Frost, certify that:

          1.     Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Parkview Group, Inc.;

          2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

          4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

                    (a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

                    (b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

                    (c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (thefourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

          5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                    (a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

                    (b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the June 30,
2000  Balance  Sheet  and  Income  Statement and is qualified in its entirety by
reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     120,636
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            8,816,737
<ALLOWANCES>                               100,000
<INVENTORY>                             14,376,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        24,263,121
<PP&E>                                   8,616,461
<DEPRECIATION>                           5,299,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          27,761,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    8,762,636
<BONDS>                                 20,477,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    5,974,911
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    18,547
<OTHER-SE>                              (7,537,904)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            27,761,129
<SALES>                                 23,570,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        23,570,413
<CGS>                                   19,448,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           22,290,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,138,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            140,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                99,172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         41,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                41,573
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.200)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.200)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nicholas G. Hall, as Chief Operating Officer (Principal financial and
accounting officer), of Hollywood Media Corp. (the "Company") certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 10-K report for the year
ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

   Date:   March 31, 2003          By: /s/ Nicholas G. Hall
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Nicholas G. Hall, Chief Operating Officer