alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### G. Yvonne STEPHENS, Appellant, v. John A. HEDBACK, Trustee of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of G. Yvonne Stephens; Mary Jo A. Jensen-Carter, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Larry Kenneth Alexander, Bankruptcy 98-33694, Appellees.

No. 07-3342.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2009.

Filed: April 21, 2009.

G. Yvonne Stephens, St. Paul, MN, pro se.

, John A. Hedback, St. Anthony, MN, Michael Joseph Iannacone, III, Lake Elmo, MN, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Georgina Stephens appeals an order of the district court1 which (1) affirmed a partial-summary-judgment order of the bankruptcy court,2 holding that Stephens does not have an ownership interest in a residence at 875 Laurel Avenue in St. Paul, Minnesota, and (2) denied Stephens’s “Motion for the Withdrawal of the Bank*537ruptcy Court’s Reference.” In addition, the district court imposed restrictions on future filings by Stephens related to the property.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, we find no basis for reversal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 158(d) (courts of appeals shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions, judgments, orders, and decrees entered by district courts sitting as appellate court in bankruptcy matter); *In re Farmland Indus., Inc.,*397 F.3d 647, 650 (8th Cir.2005) (order entered before conclusion of complex bankruptcy case is not appealable under § 158(d) unless it finally resolves discrete segment of proceeding); *see also In re M & S Grading, Inc.,*526 F.3d 363, 367 (8th Cir.2008) (appellate court reviews bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo); *Lemonds v. St. Louis County,*222 F.3d 488, 492 (8th Cir.2000) (de novo review of jurisdictional challenges); *In re Tyler,*839 F.2d 1290, 1290-95 (8th Cir.1988) (per curiam) (courts have discretion to place reasonable restrictions on litigant who generally abuses judicial process; affirming district court’s order limiting inmate to single monthly filing in district court because of inmate’s flagrant and repeated abuse of judicial process).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2

. The Honorable Dennis D. O'Brien, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Exhibit
23




CONSENT
OF RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.




January
25, 2010





Verso
Paper Corp.


Verso
Paper Holdings LLC


6775
Lenox Center Court, Suite 400


Memphis,
TN 38115-4436





Ladies
and Gentlemen:





Resource
Information Systems, Inc. (RISI) hereby consents to the citation by Verso Paper
Corp. and Verso Paper Holdings LLC (collectively, Verso) of data reported by our
source, RISI, Inc., and to the use of our name in connection with the use of
such data in the reports that Verso files with and submits to the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




/s/ John
Maine


Vice
President World Graphic Papers


Resource
Information Systems, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDC Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Barton BrookmanMay 4, 2022Barton BrookmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)/s/ R. Scott MeyersMay 4, 2022R. Scott MeyersSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2805

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States and on the Great Lakes and their tributary

and connecting waters in trade with Canada for the vessel AMANDA.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1993

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the United States and on the Great Lakes and their tributary

and connecting waters in trade with Canada for the

vessel AMANDA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12107 of

6 title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor-
2

•HR 2805 IH

1 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap2 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

3 trade of the United States and on the Great Lakes and

4 their tributary and connecting waters in trade with Can5 ada for the vessel AMANDA (Michigan State registration

6 number MC1125FR).

Æ
Exhibit 10.8.6

EnergySolutions, Inc.  2007 Equity Incentive Plan    NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
(Performance-Based: [Business Unit] Operating Income)

THIS NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT (the "Award Agreement") is made
effective as of [            ] (the "Date of Grant") between
EnergySolutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (with any successor, the "Company"), and [            ](the "Participant"):

R E C I T A L S:

WHEREAS,
the Company has adopted the EnergySolutions, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the
"Plan"), which Plan is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Award Agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein
(including in Section 10) shall have the same meanings as in the Plan; and

WHEREAS,
the Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Committee") has determined that it would be in the best interests of the Company
and its stockholders to grant the option provided for herein to the Participant pursuant to the Plan and the terms set forth herein.

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth (including, without limitation, the restrictive covenants described in Section 7, the parties agree
as follows:



---





2

---





3

---





4

---





[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

5

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Award Agreement.

ENERGYSOLUTIONS, INC.By:

Val John Christensen, President and CEOAgreed and acknowledged as
of the date first above written:PARTICIPANT


6

---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0514 IN THE MATTER OF, A. Z. G., A Youth Under the Age of Eighteen. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 13 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 9 2024

08/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0514
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001026743
<NAME> EURAMAX INTERNATIONAL PLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                          16,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,442
<INVENTORY>                                     77,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,981
<PP&E>                                         140,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 411,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,014
<BONDS>                                        135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     49,639
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   411,752
<SALES>                                        288,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,586
<CGS>                                          231,724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   260
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,241
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,772
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,469
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
2009-1613.

#### State v. Wiggins.

Fairfield App. No. 09CA9. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3582]


U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy; Notice of Meeting

    The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, reauthorized 
pursuant to P.L. 106-113 (H.R. 3194, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 
2000), will meet on Tuesday, March 13, 2001, in Room 600, 301 4th St., 
SW., Washington, DC from 9:30 a.m. to 12:00 Noon.
    The Commission will discuss FSI training programs on public 
diplomacy, public diplomacy in the Far East, and the Smith-Mundt Act.
    Members of the general public may attend the meeting, though 
attendance of public members will be limited to the seating available. 
Access to the building is controlled, and individual building passes 
are required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should 
contact David J. Kramer, Executive Director, at (202) 619-4463.

    Dated: February 22, 2001.
David J. Kramer,
Executive Director, U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-5765 Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-U
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19


                   2003 COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THOMAS SPARRVIK


The main focus this year is to grow the company and continue on the path of
profitability. The main challenge will be to continue to motivate the staff
while located in San Diego. This reward system intends to motivate you to
fulfill both the Company tasks and, in the long term, create shareholder value
for all shareholders of KMC.

The existing contract between us will remain in effect as a base contract;
however, your monthly base salary will continue to be $2000/month effective
01/01/03, and you will not be part of the KMC benefit plans:

A `per quarter' bonus will be paid to you, based on the following quarterly
Operating Profit:

        o    If less than $150K, then $0/Qtr.

        o    If more than $150K, but less than $399K, then $5,000/Qtr.

        o    If more than $400K, but less than $600K, then $7,500/Qtr.

        o    If more than $600K, but less than $900K, then $10,000/Qtr.

        o    If more than $900K, then $15,000/Qtr.

A `year end' bonus of $20,000 will be paid to you if the 2003 Annual Operating
Profit for KMC exceeds $1.2 million.

A `year end' bonus will be paid to you based on the following 2003 annual
Revenue results:

        o    If at least $15 million, then $7,500.

        o    If between $15 million and $18 million, then an additional
             $12,500, prorated.

        o    If $18 million or more, then $20,000.

Before the bonuses are paid, financial results must be received and approved by
the Compensation Committee Chairman.

No Q3 or Q4 bonus will be paid if the 2003 YTD cumulative Operating Profit at
the end of these quarters is less than $800K.

This agreement will be added to your existing contract and will be in effect Q1
through Q4, 2003.



/s/ Thomas Sparrvik                      /s/ Richard L. Poss
----------------------------------       ---------------------------------------
Thomas Sparrvik, CEO                     Richard L. Poss
                                         Chairman, Compensation Committee



                                         /s/ David C. Malmberg
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         David C. Malmberg
                                         Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13717-13718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-52-040]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Settlement 
Agreement

March 1, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 23, 2001, Williams Gas Pipelines 
Central, Inc., Ash Grove Cement, Atmos Energy Corporation, Farmland 
Industries, Inc., FMC Corporation, Heartland Cement, Kansas Gas Service 
Company, a Division of ONEOK, Inc., the Kansas Corporation Commission 
(KCC), Kansas Industrial Energy Supply Company, Lone Star Industries, 
Inc., Amoco Production Company, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., 
Mobil Oil Corporation, OXY USA Inc., and Union Pacific Resources 
Company, collectively Sponsoring Parties, filed a Settlement Agreement 
(Settlement) under Rule 602 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure in the captioned docket. A copy of the Settlement is 
available for public inspection in the Commission's Public Reference 
Room and may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Sponoring Parties state the purpose of the voluntary Settlement is 
to facilitate the partial resolution of complicated claims and mitigate 
administrative burdens relating to refunds asserted to be due as a 
result of the collection of Kansas ad valorem tax reimbursements in 
excess of maximum lawful prices

[[Page 13718]]

under the Natural Gas Policy Act. Sponsoring Parties also assert the 
Settlement, together with a Stipulated Settlement to be filed with the 
KCC, will resolve any issues between the Settling Parties but will not 
impact the claims of other parties. In addition, Sponsoring Parties 
state the Settlement will resolve all claims except those related to 
refunds due to Missouri jurisdictional customers and is supported by 
all active parties in Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska and Colorado.
    Comments on the Settlement Agreement are due by March 15, 2001; 
reply comments are due on March 22, 2001. Comments and protests may be 
filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5531 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2009-1796.

#### State v. Holmes.

Cuyahoga App. No. 91948, 2009-Ohio-3736. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
ARTICLES
OF AMENDMENT


TO
THE


ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION


OF


RIM
SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY





Pursuant
to the provisions of Section 16-10a-1006 of the Utah Revised Business
Corporation Act, Rim Semiconductor Company, a Utah corporation (the
“Corporation”), files these Articles of Amendment of the Articles of
Incorporation.





1. The name
of the Corporation is Rim Semiconductor Company.





2. The
following amendments were adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation on June
3, 2008, pursuant to the requirements of the Utah Revised Business Corporation
Act.





3. Article
IV, Paragraph A of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended so as to read
in its entirety as follows:





A.           The
aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have the authority to
issue is four billion fifteen million shares (4,015,000,000), of which four
billion (4,000,000,000) shares shall be designated as Common Stock, $.001 par
value per share and fifteen million (15,000,000) shares shall be designated as
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share.





4.           The
number of shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote upon such
amendments was 718,474,130.  The number of votes represented at the
meeting was 532,744,065.





5.           The
number of shares voted for the amendment set forth in paragraph 3 above was
532,558,975.  The number of shares cast for the amendment was
sufficient for approval of the amendment.





6.           The
foregoing amendments do not provide for an exchange, reclassification, or
cancellation of issued shares of the Corporation.





Dated:  June
3, 2008








Rim
      Semiconductor Company
              
              
              
              By: /s/ Brad
      Ketch
              Brad
      Ketch
              President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christino LOPEZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Cristino Lopez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41371

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern, District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Christino Lopez-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Bruce Johnson, the Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
undersigned's knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30,
     2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:  November 7, 2003                  Bruce Johnson
                                          ----------------------------
                                          Bruce Johnson,
                                          Sr. Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Sidney E. Anderson, principal financial officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (the
Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Sidney E. Anderson                                        
|Sidney E. Anderson, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                                 

July 15, 2009
# Percent Positive - User Note

# FY2022Q2
#### Devore *v.*Ponder.

Submitted March 2,

Decided March 25, 1901.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

*Teasley & Hutcherson*and *J. P. Brooke,*for plaintiff.

*B. F. Simpson, T. L. Lewis,*and *S. R. Atkinson,*for defendant.

Lumpkin, P. J.

The questions presented by the motion to dismiss the writ of error in the present case, and by the motion to amend the bill of exceptions, are controlled by the decision of this court in the case of *Orr*v. *Webb,*112 *Ga.*806. It results that the former motion must be sustained and the latter denied. *Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2683 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2683

 To extend the operation of the migrant student record transfer system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1993

  Mr. Ford of Michigan (for himself and Mr. Goodling) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the operation of the migrant student record transfer system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RECORD TRANSFER SYSTEM.

    (a) Program Extension.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
Federal law, the Secretary of Education shall extend the contract for 
the operation of the migrant student record transfer system under 
section 1203(a)(2)(A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 to operate such system until such time as the Secretary of 
Education determines is necessary, but shall not extend such contract 
beyond June 30, 1995, without conducting a competition.
    (b) Program Modification.--Major modification of such system may be 
made only after consultation with the Committee on Education and Labor 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human 
Resources of the Senate.

                                 <all>
```