alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,598,220
<SECURITIES>                                   779,680
<RECEIVABLES>                                      182
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,502,816
<PP&E>                                       1,501,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                 856,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,153,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,820
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,019,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,153,430
<SALES>                                          8,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,369
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,245,442
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,141,073)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,141,073)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,141,073)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2834 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2834

     To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the wetland 
                         conservation program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2018

  Mr. Hoeven introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the wetland 
                         conservation program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wetland Delineation Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. WETLAND CONVERSION.

    Section 1221(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3821(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Except as'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Except as''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Duty of the secretary.--The Secretary shall determine 
        that a person is ineligible under paragraph (1) only after the 
        Secretary determines that an exemption under section 1222(b) 
        does not apply to that person.''.

SEC. 3. DELINEATION OF WETLANDS.

    (a) Identification of Minimal Effect Exemptions.--Section 1222(d) 
of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3822(d)) is amended in the 
first sentence by inserting ``and not later than 180 days after the 
date of enactment of the Wetland Delineation Act of 2018,'' before 
``the Secretary''.
    (b) Mitigation Banking.--Section 1222(k)(1)(B) of the Food Security 
Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3822(k)(1)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Of the funds'' and inserting the 
        following:
                            ``(i) Mandatory funding.--Of the funds'';
            (2) in clause (i) (as so designated), by striking 
        ``$10,000,000'' and all that follows through ``paragraph'' and 
        inserting ``to carry out this paragraph $10,000,000 for fiscal 
        year 2019 and each fiscal year thereafter, to remain available 
        until expended''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Authorization of appropriations.--
                        There is authorized to be appropriated to the 
                        Secretary to carry out this paragraph 
                        $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 
                        through 2023.''.
                                 <all>
```
Lisa Vontalge

Page 2

Be Food Safe: CLEAN: Wash Hands and Surfaces Often SEPARATE: Separate Raw Meats from Other Foods

COOK: Cook To The Right Temperature CHILL: Refrigerate Food Promptly

 An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

information, such as home addresses, telephone numbers, or Social Security Numbers, all 

of which are protected from disclosure under FOIA Exemption 6.

If you have any questions about the way this request was handled, please contact Tony 

Trenkle at 202-720-2110 or via email at Anthony.Trenkle@usda.gov. If you have general 

questions about FSIS’ FOIA procedures or regulations, please contact our FOIA Public 

Liaison, Arianne Perkins, at 202-690-2760 or via email at Arianne.perkins@usda.gov. 

Additionally, you may contact the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) at 

the National Archives and Records Administration to inquire about the FOIA mediation 

services they offer. The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of 

Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 

Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; 

telephone at 202-741-5770; or facsimile at 202-741-5769.

Thank you for your interest in FSIS programs and policies. 

Sincerely,

Arianne M. Perkins

Director, Freedom of Information Act Staff

Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Enclosure: Responsive Records (1,216 pages)

 Excel Spreadsheets (2 documents)
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*February 24, 2010*

[Cite as *02/24/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-620.]

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2009-1515.

#### State ex rel. Schaeffer v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-913, 2009-Ohio-3354. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129006 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129006 

 COA: 254866 

Oakland CC: 2003-191131-FH 

LAMONT CHARLES ETHERIDGE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

t1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2652 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2652

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the establishment 
   through the National Institutes of Health of a data system and an 
        information clearinghouse with respect to rare diseases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 1993

  Mr. Roemer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the establishment 
   through the National Institutes of Health of a data system and an 
        information clearinghouse with respect to rare diseases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jonathan Tomal Rare Diseases Public 
Information Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF DATA SYSTEM AND INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE WITH 
              RESPECT TO RARE DISEASES.

    Part A of title IV of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 281 
et seq.), as amended by section 207 of Public Law 103-43, is amended by 
adding at the end the following section:

  ``data system and information clearinghouse regarding rare diseases

    ``Sec. 404E. (a) Data System.--The Director of NIH, acting through 
the appropriate national research institutes, shall establish the 
National Rare Diseases Data System for the collection, storage, 
analysis, retrieval, and dissemination of data derived from patient 
populations with rare diseases, disorders, or other health conditions, 
including where possible, data involving general populations for the 
purpose of detection of individuals with a risk of developing such 
diseases, disorders, or conditions.
    ``(b) Information Clearinghouse.--The Director of NIH, acting 
through the appropriate national research institutes, shall establish 
the National Rare Diseases Information Clearinghouse to facilitate and 
enhance, through the effective dissemination of information, knowledge 
and understanding of rare diseases, disorders, and other health 
conditions by health professionals, patients, and the public.
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--For the purpose of carrying 
out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $3,000,000 
for fiscal year 1994, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the 
fiscal years 1995 and 1996.''.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13110-13111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4998]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE


Redelegation of Authorities by the Secretary of State, From the 
Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs to the Assistant Secretary 
of State for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs; 
Delegation of Authority 240

    By virtue of the authority vested in me by the laws of the United 
States, including the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, I 
hereby delegate to R. Rand Beers, the Assistant Secretary for 
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, to the extent

[[Page 13111]]

authorized by law, all authorities vested in the Under Secretary of 
State for Global Affairs, including all authorities vested in the 
Secretary of State that have been or may be delegated or redelegated to 
that Under Secretary.
    Any authorities covered by this delegation may also be exercised by 
the Deputy Secretary, the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, or the 
Under Secretary for Economic, Business and Agricultural Affairs.
    This delegation shall expire upon the appointment of an individual 
to serve as Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs.
    This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 22, 2001.
Colin L. Powell,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 01-4998 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-U
| Commercial        Loans Mortgage        LoansOther        LoansREOJudgmentsSecuritiesOther AssetsEquity in SubsDeficiencies22.5%    3.7%0.2%0.7%1.7%11.5%43.5%15.6%0.5%
                      Source: Reports from FDIC Division of Finance

Back to Chart
 19981999200020012002Other3,909    3,8203,3953,1812,097Liquidation795753468454522    Supervision    2,6552,6932,5892,5322,811Total7,3597,2666,4526,1675,430

                      Source: FDIC, 2002 Annual Report

Back          to Chart |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00137-CR

EX PARTE Roberto GARCIA

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 14, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On March 2, 2012, relator Roberto Garcia filed an original petition for writ of habeas 

corpus in this court. However, as an intermediate court of appeals this court is not authorized to 

grant the relief requested. Pursuant to section 22.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil 

matters, a court of appeals “may issue a writ of habeas corpus when it appears that the restraint 

of liberty is by virtue of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of 

the violation of an order, judgment, or decree previously made, rendered, or entered by the court 

or judge in a civil case.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). However, in 

criminal matters, a court of appeals has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Watson v. State, 

96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CR-2719, styled State of Texas v. Roberto Garcia, pending in the 

399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez Gardner presiding.
04-12-00137-CR

- 2 -

835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.). In criminal matters, the courts authorized to issue 

writs of habeas corpus are the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the 

county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (West 2005). Therefore, we dismiss 

this petition for writ of habeas for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*March 12, 2010*

[Cite as *03/1212010 Case Announcements #3,*2010-Ohio-959.j

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2010-0330.

#### State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of an amended complaint for a writ of prohibition and mandamus adding the Franklin County Board of Commissioners. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for emergency stay and expedited alternative writ,

It is ordered that the prohibition claim is dismissed and relator’s motion for an emergency stay and expedited alternative writ is denied insofar as it is based on the prohibition claim.

It is further ordered that an alternative writ is granted on relator’s mandamus claim, and respondents are sua sponte stayed from enforcing or proceeding on their decisions disqualifying relator’s bid and awarding the contract to an alternate contractor pending the court's resolution of relator’s mandamus claim.

The respondents shall file an answer to the complaint within seven days of this entry; the parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the *1514filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after the filing of respondents’ brief.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32.01

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

                                     By: /s/ BARRY MINDES
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Barry Mindes
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20270

Summary Calendar

NORBERTO ROBLES,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

JOE D. DRIVER, Warden, Houston Federal Detention Center,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CV-694

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Norberto Robles, federal prisoner # 82724-179, appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The district court determined that

Robles’ § 2241 petition was premature because his claims were directed to his

criminal proceeding, which was active. We note that the district court appears

to have treated Robles’ pleading as arising under § 2241, not § 2255. See Castro

v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 383 (2003). Robles’ brief is entirely devoted to the

merits of his claims for relief. Although he asserts that he properly sought

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 29, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20270 Document: 00511278745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/29/2010
No. 10-20270

habeas relief pursuant to § 2241 because he filed his petition prior to being

sentenced, Robles provides no explanation for his conclusory assertion. By

failing to address the basis for the district court’s dismissal, Robles has

abandoned the threshold issue in this appeal. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,

224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-20270 Document: 00511278745 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/29/2010
#### CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC., and Indiana Forge, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and William L. Koss, Counterclaim Defendant, v. MILLER VENEERS, INC., Thomas A. Miller, Benjamin R. Miller, Sally M. Sando, Robert D. Brand, Indianapolis Veneer Works, LLC, Egenolf Machine, Inc., and Merritt Plywood Machinery, Inc., Defendants/Counter-claimants-Appellees.

No. 2014-1171.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 7, 2014.

Paul B. Overhauser, Overhauser Law Offices, LLC, Greenfield, IN, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-appellants.

Michael A. Swift, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were J. Lee McNeely, Cynthia A. Bedrick, and Charles B. Daugherty, McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Harrold, Shelbyville, IN.

LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### John ROMANO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PORSCHE CLUB OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-14419

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 29, 2007.

Danny D. Henderson, Huntsville, AL, 'for Defendant-Appellant.

Richard J. Garvey, Jr., Caleb H. Didriksen, III, Loyd J. Bourgeois, Jr., Didriksen Law Firm, PLC, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for John Romano against Porsche Club of America, Inc. (“PCA”), Cary C. Collins, and Charles P. Swanson. The district court found that PCA, Collins, and Swanson were jointly and severally liable for the damages caused when Swanson crashed Romano’s 1970 Porsche 908/3, a valuable vintage race car, into a telephone pole. PCA appeals the judgment, arguing that it has no liability to Romano. In what he labels a cross-appeal, Romano argues that the district court erred in refusing to award him damages for loss of use of the vehicle during the time required to repair it.

We find no reversible error in the district court’s finding of liability. The district court did not err in finding that a bailment for hire had been created between PCA and Romano when Jon Lowe (on behalf of PCA) and Dale Miller (on behalf of Romano) agreed that the Porsche would be displayed at the Dixie Tech 2002 event and would be stored in Collins’s garage before and after the event. (R.3-62 at 33.) Neither did the court err in finding that the bailment had not been terminated on the date of the accident; that Swanson, Secretary of the Heart of Dixie chapter of PCA, negligently operated the Porsche; and that Collins, also a *899Heart of Dixie *member, negligently*allowed Swanson to operate the vehicle. (R.3-62 at 17, 22, 36-37.) Because PCA had a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard the Porsche, and it was negligent in performing that duty, it is liable to Romano. *See Southern Garage Co. v. Brown,*187 Ala. 484, 65 So. 400, 401 (1914).

Because Romano filed no notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction to entertain his arguments regarding the damages award. *Sizzler Family Steak Houses v. Western Sizzlin Steak House, Inc.,*793 F.2d 1529, 1541 (11th Cir.1986) (citing Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(3)).

AFFIRMED.
[No. 58956-3-I.

Division One.

September 10, 2007.]

#### Henry Seaman, *Appellant,*v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Ring County, No. 05-2-31320-0, Michael J. Fox, J., entered September 19 and 29, 2006. *Reversed*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.