alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PFIZER INC.
AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET FOR JULY 2, 2000
AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JULY 2, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                          1,590
<SECURITIES>                                    4,402
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (232)
<INVENTORY>                                     2,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,816
<PP&E>                                         13,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,720)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,218
<BONDS>                                         1,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              00
<PREFERRED>                                        00
<COMMON>                                          335
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,044
<SALES>                                        14,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,263
<CGS>                                           2,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               945
<DISCONTINUED>                                     00
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    00
<CHANGES>                                          00
<NET-INCOME>                                      945
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .15


</TABLE>
2010-0136.

#### State v. Campain.

Richland App. Nos. 09CA35 and 09CA36, 2009-Ohio-4571 and 2009-Ohio-4573. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 20-40597 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee/Cross-Appellant, 

versus

Alexandru Bittner, 

Defendant—Appellant/Cross-Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:19-CV-415 

ON REMAND FROM 

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Clement and Duncan, Circuit 

Judges.

Per Curiam:* 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

April 28, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 20-40597 Document: 00516730932 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2023
No. 20-40597 

2 

The case is REMANDED to the district court for further 

proceedings in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bittner v. United 

States, 143 S. Ct. 713 (2023). 

Case: 20-40597 Document: 00516730932 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2023
#### Lonnie Lee POSLOF, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-15605.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr., Corcoran, CA, pro se.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lonnie Poslof, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s *7order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file an amended complaint after the district court dismissed his complaint with leave to amend. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier,*191 F.3d 983, 989 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.

The district court gave Poslof notice of the insufficiencies of his amended complaint, dismissed it with leave to amend, warned him that failure to amend would result in dismissal of his action, and provided him with ample opportunity to submit a second amended complaint, but Poslof failed to do so. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of the action. *See id.*at 992 (affirming dismissal of action following plaintiffs failure to amend complaint after receiving leave to do so, where the interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, the court’s management of its docket, and avoiding prejudice to defendants favored dismissal).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Poslof s request for the appointment of counsel because he did not establish the requisite exceptional circumstances. *See Terrell v. Brewer,*935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991) (setting forth standard for appointment of counsel).

Poslofs remaining contentions, to the extent we are able to understand them, are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 23.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors andShareholders of 

Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. (Endesa-Chile) 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 of Enersis S.A. (Registration No. 333-186823**)**of our reports dated March 20, 2013, with respect tothe consolidated statements of financial position of Endesa-Chile and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Enersis S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2012,and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement. 

/s/ KPMG

KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. 

Santiago, Chile 

March 20, 2013
ACRONYMS 

AMDUCA – Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act 

AMS – Agricultural Marketing Service 

APHIS – Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

ARS – Agricultural Research Service 

CDC – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

CHCs – Chlorinated Hydrocarbons 

COPs – Chlorinated Organophosphates 

FDA – Food and Drug Administration 

FSIS – Food Safety and Inspection Service 

EPA – Environmental Protection Agency 

HACCP – Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points 

IPP – Inspection Program Personnel 

IRSP – Import Reinspection Sampling Program 

KISTM test – Kidney Inhibition Swab Test 

NASS – National Agricultural Statistics Service 

NRP – U. S. National Residue Program (Domestic & Import) 

NSAID – Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug 

OFO – Office of Field Operations 

OPHS – Office of Public Health Science 

PHIS – Public Health Information System 

PHV – Public Health Veterinarian 

SAT – Surveillance Advisory Team 

TOI – Types of Inspection
U.S. flag
          Un sitio web oficial del gobierno de los Estados Unidos **Los sitios web oficiales usan .gov**
                
                Un sitio web **.gov** pertenece a una organización oficial del Gobierno de Estados Unidos.
 **Los sitios web seguros .gov usan HTTPS**
                
                Un **https://** significa que usted se conectó de forma segura a un sitio web .gov. Comparta información sensible sólo en sitios web oficiales y seguros.


Educación financiera
            Seguro de depósito
            Noticias para el consumidor
            Acerca de la FDIC
            Search
              Buscar en este sitio web
    Search
  Advanced Search

                    How Can We Help You?
    I am a...Bank CustomerBankerConsumerSmall Business OwnerAnalyst/Researcher/StudentLegal ProfessionalBank RegulatorPress/MediaVendor/ContractorLegislative Staff MemberJobseekerCourt ClerkProsecutor/Probation OfficerInvestigatorSelect the information you wish to explore based on who you are
    I want to...Get Started*Switch to English*
		|
		*Glosario*
  Buscar en este sitio web
    Search
  Advanced Search

            How Can We Help You?
    I am a...Bank CustomerBankerConsumerSmall Business OwnerAnalyst/Researcher/StudentLegal ProfessionalBank RegulatorPress/MediaVendor/ContractorLegislative Staff MemberJobseekerCourt ClerkProsecutor/Probation OfficerInvestigatorSelect the information you wish to explore based on who you are
    I want to...Get Started


Inicio


Español Información de contacto


FDIC póngase en contacto
    ¿Necesita ayuda?
	El Centro de Contacto de la FDIC puede responder a sus llamadas  
	  
    Lamadas gratuitas:
    1-877-ASK-FDIC (1-877-275-3342) seleccione 9 para español
	 Personas con deficiencias auditivas: 
	  1-800-925-4618 o (703) 562-2289
	  
	  
    Horario de operaciones:
    8:00 a.m. a 6:00 p.m. (hora del Este) De lunes a viernes
	  (No incluye días federales feriados)
	  
    Sábados de 8:00 a.m. a 1:00 p.m. (hora del Este)
	  
    Cerramos el domingo

				
				
              Regrese a FDIC en español


Volver a la cima


Póngase en contacto con la fdic
    Póngase en contacto
 Manténgase Informado
	  *(Inglés)*
    Incluya su correo electrónico
    Comience Aquí
 ¿Cómo Podemos Ayudarle?
	*(Inglés)*
  Define “I am a . . . ” to learn more specific information
    Soy...Bank CustomerBankerConsumerSmall Business OwnerAnalyst/Researcher/StudentLegal ProfessionalBank RegulatorPress/MediaVendor/ContractorLegislative Staff MemberJobseekerCourt ClerkProsecutor/Probation OfficerInvestigatorSelect the information you wish to explore based on who you are
    Quiero...Comience Aquí


Esta información sólo está disponible en inglés.
 Pólizas
            
            Ayuda
            Ley por la libertad de la información
            In English
            Accesibilidad
            Gobierno Abierto
            Mapa Del Sitio
            USA.gov
            
			  Privacidad
			Ley de Comunicacrión clara y simple
			  Ley Antidiscriminatoria
            Inspector General
2009-1351.

#### Cincinnati v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

Hamilton App. No. C-080819, 2009-Ohio-2834.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Joseph K. Jachinowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  | 
|-------------- |  |  |  | 
|              
|April 24, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  |
**Exhibit 12.2**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Eduardo Escaffi J., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report onForm 20-F of Enersis S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 20, 2013.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00539-CV

Joe Pittman Young

v.

Anna S. Lopez, et al.

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-18-1038-CV-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant, Joe Pittman Young, although he is exempt from payment due to his inability 

to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 21, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-845-000]


FirstEnergy Generation Corporation; Notice of Issuance of Order

February 28, 2001.
    On December 28, 2000, FirstEnergy Generation Corporation, 
(hereafter ``GENCO'', a recently formed subsidiary of FirstEnergy 
Services Corporation) filed with the Commission an application seeking 
the authority to sell energy and capacity at market-based rates. In its 
filing, GENCO also requested certain waivers and authorizations. In 
particular, GENCO requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liabilities by GENCO. On February 22, 2001, the 
Commission issued an Order Accepting For Filing Market-Based Rate 
Tariff And Granting Waivers And Blanket Authorizations (Order), in the 
above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's February 22, 2001 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
GENCO should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, GENCO is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of GENCO, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of GNECO's 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. * * *
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 26, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5336 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred D. CALVERT, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-2622.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 2011.*

Decided Feb. 18, 2011.

Jeffrey Perconte, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Andrew J. McGowan, Richard H. Parsons, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

*962Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge, DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge.

*

 After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).

ORDER

Fred Calvert, Jr. and two other men agreed to help a drug courier rob a “stash house,” but the courier was actually a federal agent. After being arrested and indicted, Calvert pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, *see*21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a), and possessing a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, *see*18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). He was subject to mandatory minimum sentences of 10 years on the conspiracy charge and 5 years on the firearm charge. *See*§§ 841(b)(1)(A), 846; § 924(c)(1)(A)®. The judge imposed a 188-month sentence on the former charge and a consecutive 60-month sentence on the latter, resulting in a total sentence of 248 months.

On appeal Calvert argues only that he should not receive a consecutive sentence under § 924(c), based on that statute’s “except” clause. As is relevant here, the statute provides that a court shall impose a minimum five-year consecutive sentence if the defendant possesses a firearm “in furtherance of’ a drug trafficking crime, “[ejxcept to the extent that a greater minimum sentence is otherwise provided by this subsection or by any other provision of law.” § 924(c)(1)(A). He argues that this “except” clause precludes courts from imposing a mandatory minimum sentence under § 924(c)(1)(A) if the underlying criminal statute — here § 841(b)(1)(A)— mandates a greater minimum sentence. Because the conspiracy charge carried a 10-year mandatory minimum, he urges that the 5-year mandatory minimum for his weapons charge should not apply.

The Supreme Court recently rejected this argument, however, in *Abbott v. United States,*— U.S. ---, 131 S.Ct. 18, 178 L.Ed.2d 348 (2010). There the Court concluded that a defendant subject to a mandatory consecutive sentence for a § 924(c) conviction is “not spared from that sentence by virtue of receiving a higher mandatory minimum on a different count of conviction.” *Id.*at 23; *see United States v. Spagnola,*632 F.3d 981, 989-90 (7th Cir.2011); *United States v. Easter,*553 F.3d 519, 525 (7th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 3.1




ARTICLES
OF INCORPORATION


OF
 BELVEDERE
SOCAL
  ARTICLE
I
  The name
of this corporation is Belvedere SoCal.
  ARTICLE
II
  The
purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which
a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of California
other than the banking business, the trust company business, or the practice of
a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California Corporations
Code.
  ARTICLE
III
  The name
and address in this state of this corporation's initial agent for service of
process is Alison Davis, Belvedere Capital Fund II L.P., 1 Maritime Plaza, Suite
825, San Francisco, California 94111.
  ARTICLE
IV
  (a) The
corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares designated "Preferred
Stock" and "Common Stock," respectively. The number of shares of Preferred Stock
authorized to be issued is 20,000,000 and the number of shares of Common Stock
authorized to be issued is 20,000,000.
  (b) The
Preferred Stock may be divided into such number of series as the Board of
Directors may determine. The Board of Directors is authorized to determine and
alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to and
imposed upon any wholly unissued series of Preferred Stock, and to fix the
number of shares of any series of Preferred Stock and the designation of any
such series of Preferred Stock. The Board of Directors, within the limits and
restrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors
originally fixing the number of shares constituting any series, may increase or
decrease (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding)
the number of shares of any series subsequent to the issue of shares of that
series.
  ARTICLE
V
  (a)      
The liability of the directors of this corporation for monetary damages shall be
eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California
law.
  
  (b) The
corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of agents (as
defined in Section 317 of the California Corporations Code) through Bylaw
provisions, agreements with agents, vote of the shareholders or disinterested
directors or otherwise, to the fullest extent permissible under California
law.
  (c) Any
amendment, repeal or modification of any provision of this Article V
shall not adversely affect any right or protection to an agent of this
corporation existing at the time of such amendment, repeal or
modification.
  Dated:
January 16, 2007
  
   /s/
      John F.
      Stuart
                John
      F. Stuart
                Incorporator