alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Jade Mountain Corporation on Form 10-K
      for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
      officers of Jade Mountain Corporation hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Jade Mountain Corporation.




/s/
                Zou DejunZou
                DejunChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Bruce RichardsonBruce
                RichardsonChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Jade Mountain Corporation and will be retained by Jade Mountain
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




April 1,
      2008
#### Santos Raul ALVARENGA-ALVARADO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-74055.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 29, 2010.

Richard Clay Mendez, Esquire, Law Offices of Mendez & Lopez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Edward C. Durant, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Offiee of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*208Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Santos Raul Alvarenga-Alvarado, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which dismissed his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.

We reject Alvarenga-Alvarado’s claim that he is eligible for asylum based on his membership in a particular social group, namely persons who fear gang activity. *See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir.2008).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because petitioner has not established it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with the acquiescence of the El Salvador government. *See Santos-Lemus,*542 F.3d at 748.

We reject petitioner’s due process claim because the BIA provided sufficient reasons for affirming the IJ, and there was no due process violation. *See Lopez v. Ashcroft,*366 F.3d 799, 807 n. 6 (9th Cir.2004).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Alvarenga-Alvarado’s remaining contentions — that he is entitled to asylum and withholding relief based on imputed anti-gang political opinion, and he is a member of a social group composed of individuals who suffer persecution by gangs due to former military service — because Alvarenga-Alvarado failed to raise those claims before the agency, and therefore he did not exhaust the claims. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          74,429
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   23,908
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     921,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,019,529
<PP&E>                          98,682
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,121,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,627,729
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        101
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,505,767)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,121,861
<SALES>                         579,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                579,790
<CGS>                           496,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   478,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              53,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (448,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (448,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (448,287)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.04)



</TABLE>
2010-0124.

#### State ex rel. Dolgencorp, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-1014, 2009-Ohio-6565.

The following ease has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 17.1:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ David Salzman
-----------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
partner of the Registrant
February 13, 2004
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2532

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

States Courthouse’’.‘‘George H. Mahon Federal Building and UnitedStates courthouse in Lubbock, Texas, as the
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2532

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse in Lubbock, Texas, as the ‘‘George H. Mahon

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 1205 Texas Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘George H. Mahon Fed7 eral Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

HR 2532 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George

6 H. Mahon Federal Building and United States Court7 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Lance Anderson,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      March 20, 2009
            
            /s/
      W. Lance AndersonW.
      Lance AndersonChairman
      of the Board of Directors andChief
      Executive Officer








This
certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 01 83 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. ISAIAH JAMES PEHRINGER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 3 0 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2024

08/26/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0183
EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-9012 of Panamerican Beverages, Inc. (a Panamanian corporation) and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form F-3, and in Registration Statements No.
333-70518, 333-65652, and 333-68320 of the Company on Forms S-8 of our report
dated February 14, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures and
reclassification of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 and 2000
financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased
operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance
other than with respect to such disclosures and reclassification) appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2002.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Miami, Florida
March 27, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto MENA-VILLAMAR, also known as Jose Carlos Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10868

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

Discretionary Review Granted June 6, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto Mena-Villamar raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boulder Capital Opportunities II,
Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Michael J. Delaney, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          or the Company.

Date:  November 21, 2005
                                                        /s/  Michael J. Delaney
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2823

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on leucovorin calcium powder.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1993

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on leucovorin

calcium powder.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LEUCOVORIN CALCIUM POWDER.

4 Heading 9902.31.00 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended to read as

6 follows:

‘‘ 9902.31.00 leucovorin calcium (provided

for in subheading

2936.29.20) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•HR 2823 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from ware4 house for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the

5 date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec7 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

8 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro9 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

10 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

11 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend12 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

13 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

14 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en15 actment of this Act;

16 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

17 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

18 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

19 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

20 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTONIO S. WARREN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1588

[November 19, 2020]

Appeal of order dismissing rule 3.850 amended motion from the Circuit 

Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. 

Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562015CF001896.

Antonio S. Warren, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

FORST, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS











We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on
Form 10-K of Vanity Events Holding, Inc. for the period from August 25, 2004
(Date of Inception) to December 31, 2008 of our report dated March 30, 2009,
relating to the financial statements for the period from August 25, 2004 (Date
of Inception) to December 31, 2008 listed in the accompanying
index.











/s/
Drakeford & Drakeford, LLC





Drakeford
& Drakeford,LLC


New York/
New York





March 31,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,058,613
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             8,600,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,654,707
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,115,958
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,138,000
<LOANS>                                     11,345,602
<ALLOWANCE>                                     57,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,758,953
<DEPOSITS>                                  27,109,085
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             79,490
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,280
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,554,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              34,758,953
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                310,080
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              328,645
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               378,794
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,017,519
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             436,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             436,018
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          581,501
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   57,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                970,626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,372)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (420,372)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (420,372)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.19
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               57,500
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            57,500
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*April 22, 2010*

[Cite as *04/22/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-1740.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

#### In re Application of Breen.

On March 8, 2010, the court issued an order indicating that Kevin Breen, as a licensed attorney, was not required to seek leave to file an appeal on behalf of Prasad Bikkani. On March 19, 2010, Breen presented a motion for extension of time to file an appeal and indicated that the decision of March 8, 2010, was in conflict with the court’s decision in 2008-1667, which struck his documents for failure to seek leave. A memorandum in opposition to the motion for extension of time was also filed.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this order extends the time by 45 days from the date of this entry for attorney Kevin Breen to file a notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction of the January 4, 2010 court of appeals decision.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

January 31, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-14760

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00410-CV-CAM-1

BRUNSWICK BOWLING & BILLIARDS

CORPORATION, LEISERV, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(January 31, 2006)

Before CARNES, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

This appeal challenges the dismissal of a complaint filed by appellant against

multiple defendants. Although the district court granted relief to other defendants,

the sole issue before us is the granting of a motion to dismiss in favor of the

defendant Illinois National Insurance Company. See footnote 10 of Appellant’s

Brief.

In ruling on the motion to dismiss in question it does appear that the district

court relied upon documents that were outside the allegations of the complaint. Since

it now appears that much of the dispute over coverage involves another legal action

in Missouri and a similar facsimile advertisement that was circulated in Missouri (this

suit deals with activity in the area of Atlanta, Georgia), we conclude that the matter

should be handled under Rule 56 as a motion for summary judgment and not under

Rule 12(b)(6). This will require the giving of a ten day notice along with the other

procedures involved.

The order of dismissal as to the Illinois National Insurance Company is vacated

and the matter remanded to the district court.

VACATED and REMANDED.
2009-1948.

#### State v. Sprauer.

Warren App. No. CA2005-02-022, 2006-Ohio-1146. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.