alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Copy
Copy
Copy
The entire outstanding ount of this Purchase 

Money Note shall be due and payable on AprillJr~·......~ '""':-~"'T"'=:.=.;.I'-== 

e 

~ 

·PURCHASE MONEY NOTE 


Certificate No.: 2 Date: April!, 2010 

ISINNo. CUSIPNo.:

Initial Note Principal Balance: $0.00 Maturity D~te: April 1, 2020 

Fixed Interest Rate: 4.00% per annum. 

First Payment Date: April26, 2010 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, MULTIDANK 2010-1 SFR VENTURE, LLC, a 

Delaware limited liability company . (herein referred to as the '1ssuer''), hereby 

unconditionally promises to pay to the order of CEDE & CO., or its successors and 

registered assigns, the principal sum of $0 (ZERO UNITED STATES DOLLARS 

ONLY) (or such other amount as shall be the outstanding principal amount of this 

Purchase Money Note shown on Schedule A hereto). 

The principal ofthis Purchase Money Note is payable in such coin or currency of 

the United States of America as at the time of payment is e tender for payment of 

public ·and private debts. 

earlier date as such amount shall become due 

Purchase Money Note. 

All payments made o this Purchase Money Note shall 

be subject to the priority o 5.1 ofthe custodial and paying 

agency agreement dated e by and among the Issuer, the Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corpor pacity, the "FDIC"), in its corporate capacity, 

as the guarantor of the Pm y Note, the FDIC, in its capacity as Receiver, as 

Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (as amended, supplemented or restated 

from time to time, the "Custodial and Paying Agency Agreemenf'). This Purchase 

Money Note is subject to all terms of the Custodial and Paying Agency Agreement. 

Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Purchase Money Note 

have the meanings provided in, or by reference in, the Custodial and Paying Agency 

Agreement. 

The Issuer will pay interest on this Purchase Money Note at the fixed rate 

specified above on each Distribution Date on the principal amount of this Purchase 

Money Note outstanding on the preceding Distribution Date (after giving effect to all 

payments of principal made on the preceding Distribution Date). Interest on this 

Purchase Money Note will accrue for each Distribution Date during related Due Period. 

Interest will be calculated assuming a year consisting of twelve 3 0-day months, except in 

the case ofthe first Distribution Date for this Purchase Money Note, for which the related 

Due Period will consist of 0 days. 

FDIC SFR2010-l 4 

Tcmporuy Regulation S Global Pwchase MoneyNote 

Pool Nos. 24020 and 24021 
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer has caused this instrument to be signed, manually 

or in facsimile, by the Initial Member as ofthe date frrst shown above. 

MULTffiANK 2010-1 SFR VENTURE, LLC 

By: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as 

Receiver 

By: 

FDIC SFR 201D-l 

Tcmponuy Global Purchase Money Note Reg S A-1 

Pool Nos. 24020 and 24021 
Copy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                        63
<INVENTORY>                                     55,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,809
<PP&E>                                         369,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 434,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,715
<BONDS>                                         62,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,310
<OTHER-SE>                                     267,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   434,619
<SALES>                                         69,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,976
<CGS>                                           50,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    91
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,486
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,845
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,641
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,641
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 17 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00895- CV

STANLEY BRYANT AND/OR ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant

V. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF THE CWABS, INC. ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-BC4 , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18- CCV -062416

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed October 4, 2018. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.2

On December 5, 2018, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2811 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to reauthorize 

the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2018 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. UDALL, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to reauthorize the Collaborative Forest Landscape 

Restoration Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RES4 TORATION PROGRAM. 

5 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 4003(f)(6) of the 

6 Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 

7 U.S.C. 7303(f)(6)) is amended by striking ‘‘$40,000,000 

8 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2019’’ and inserting 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2811 IS

1 ‘‘$80,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 

2 2029’’. 

3 (b) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 4003(h) 

4 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 

5 U.S.C. 7303(h)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 

7 the semicolon; 

8 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

10 (3) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

11 paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; 

12 (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(3) the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

15 and Forestry of the Senate;’’; and 

16 (5) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(6) the Committee on Agriculture of the 

18 House of Representatives.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 7, 2016

No. 04-16-00343-CV

IN THE MATTER OF B.S.P.,

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. CM2012JUV01933

Honorable Daphne Previti Austin, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 1, 2016, appellant filed a copy of a request for items to be included in a 

supplemental clerk’s record. We order Donna Kay McKinney, Bexar County District Clerk, to 

file the requested items in a supplemental clerk’s record by July 18, 2016.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q of  International
Specialty Products Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September
29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  Sunil Kumar,  as President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  and Neal E.  Murphy,  as Senior  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  each hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



 /s/ Sunil Kumar
-----------------------------------
Name: Sunil Kumar
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:   November 13, 2002



  /s/ Neal E. Murphy
-----------------------------------
Name: Neal E. Murphy
Title:   Senior Vice President and
           Chief Financial Officer

Date:   November 13, 2002

This  certification  accompanies   the  Report  pursuant  to Section 906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Barton, Appellant.

[3 NYS3d 653]

Lahtinen, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (McDonough, J.), rendered July 31, 2013, *1239convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree in full satisfaction of a three-count indictment and waived his right to appeal. Prior to being sentenced, defendant moved to withdraw his plea. County Court denied the motion and thereafter sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to three years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the plea colloquy and the counseled written waiver executed by defendant reveal that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence *(see People v Munger,*117 AD3d 1343 [2014], *lv denied*23 NY3d 1040 [2014]; *People v Osgood,*111 AD3d 1029, 1030 [2013], *lv denied*22 NY3d 1089 [2014]).

As to defendant’s plea, the record reflects that County Court fully informed defendant of the terms of the plea agreement during the plea colloquy, including the negotiated sentence of three years in prison and five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant affirmed that he understood the terms prior to entering his plea, that he had been provided ample time to confer with counsel and that he was satisfied with his representation, and there is nothing in the record that casts doubt upon counsel’s effectiveness *(see People v Little,*92 AD3d 1036, 1037 [2012]; *People v Graham-Harrison,*272 AD2d 780, 781 [2000]). Defendant’s unsubstantiated claim of innocence was contradicted by his plea, and County Court was within its discretion to reject it *(see People v Griffin,*89 AD3d 1235, 1236-1237 [2011]; *People v Davis,*250 AD2d 939, 940-941 [1998]). Finally, defendant’s contention that he was advised by defense counsel that he would be sentenced to two years in prison if he pleaded guilty involved a matter outside of the record *(see People v Ramos,*63 NY2d 640-642 [1984]; *People v Johnson,*77 AD3d 986, 986 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 743 [2011]). Accordingly, we find that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea.

McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
2009-1611.

#### State v. Barnes.

Clermont App. No. CA2008-10-090, 2009-Ohio-3684.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11.01

                                  ONSALE, INC.

                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (In thousands, except per share data)


                                                                Three Months
                                                                    Ended
                                                                  March 31,
                                                              ----------------
                                                                1997     1996
                                                              -------  -------
Net income                                                    $    52  $    15
                                                              =======   =======

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares:         

Common stock                                                   12,179   12,179

Common stock equivalents from convertible preferred stock
  and warrants using the "if converted" method                  1,704    1,704

Common stock equivalents from stock options using the
  "treasury stock" method                                       1,443     1,443
                                                              -------   -------

Shares used in calculation of net income per share             15,326    15,326
                                                              =======   =======

Net income per share                                          $  0.00   $  0.00
                                                              =======   =======
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         132,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,971,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,489,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,813,122
<PP&E>                                       5,275,592
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,844,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,413,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,034,290
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,832
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,718,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,413,307
<SALES>                                     13,075,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,075,763
<CGS>                                        7,352,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,300,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             238,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (613,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   232,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (381,055)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                930,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   548,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
2009-1776.

#### R. Thomas Perry, D.D.S. v. Ohio State Dental Bd.

Montgomery App. No. 22857, 2009-Ohio-4329.
**EXHIBIT 23(ii)**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors of Pfizer Inc:

We consent to the use of our reports dated February 27, 2007, with respect  to the consolidated balance sheets of Pfizer Inc and Subsidiary Companies as  of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,  shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness  of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the  effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,  2006 incorporated herein by reference. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York  March 1, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                        7,415,128
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,511,623
<ALLOWANCES>                  1,145,380
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,335,786
<PP&E>                        83,343,814
<DEPRECIATION>                11,724,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                80,736,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         789,388
<BONDS>                       54,770,395
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    25,585,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  80,736,230
<SALES>                       6,061,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              9,712,142
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,659,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,845,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3,218,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (10,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           000
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (10,974)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### GCC ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. and Ironclad Services, Inc., Defendant.

No. 2010-5075.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2010.

Michael H. Payne, Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman, of Philadelphia, PA, *524argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Joseph A. Hackenbracht.

David M. Hibey, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Alan J. Lo Re, Assistant Director.

LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906**

 

I, Michael A. Sicuro, Chief Financial Officer of Mikohn Gaming Corporation (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge: 

 

1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, towhich this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Registrant. 

 

Date: March 15, 2005
#### Dexter Alphonso KESS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE COMMISSIONER, # 2116; Mr. Burns, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 13-7967.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 24, 2014.

Decided: April 28, 2014.

*252Dexter Alphonso Kess, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dexter Alphonso Kess appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Kess v. State Comm’r, #2116,*No. 8:13-ev-3363-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 20, 2013). We deny Kess’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*