alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

               PREMIER RESEARCH WORLDWIDE, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 For the Three Months Ended            For the Six Months Ended
                                                               ------------------------------        -----------------------------
                                                               June 30, 1997    June 30, 1996        June 30, 1997   June 30, 1996
                                                               -------------    -------------        -------------   -------------
<S>                                                             <C>             <C>                   <C>            <C>
Net income (loss)                                               $   (561)                              $   (137)
                                                                ========                               ========
Average shares outstanding                                         6,938                                  6,517


Net effect of dilutive stock options-based on
  treasury stock method using average market price                     0                                      0
                                                                --------                               --------

Weighted average share                                             6,938                                  6,517
                                                                ========                               ========

Net income per common share                                     $  (0.08)                              $  (0.02)
                                                                ========                               ========

Pro forma net income                                                             $   421                               $   403
                                                                                 =======                               =======

Pro forma weighted average shares assuming the conversion of
 the minority interest in the limited liability company into
 Common Stock of the Company as if it had converted as of
 January 1, 1996 instead of at the closing of the initial
 public offering                                                                   5,003                                 5,003
                                                                                 =======                               =======

Pro forma net income per common share                                            $  0.08                               $  0.08
                                                                                 =======                               =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31

               CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K

          Re: FFMLT 2007-FFB-SS (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through
              Certificates, Series 2007-FFB-SS, issued pursuant to the
              Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2007
              (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage
              Securities Corp., as depositor (the "Depositor"), Home Loan
              Services, Inc., as servicer (the "Servicer") and Deutsche
              Bank National Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee")

I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of the Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
 circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

     4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material
respects; and

     5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee and the
Servicer.



<page>

Dated: March 31, 2008

/s/ Michelle Gill
Michelle Gill
Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)
2009-1865.

#### In re S.S.

Licking App. No. 2009CA0040, 2009-Ohio-4520. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon review of the appeal it appears that the case involves the termination of parental rights/adoption. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case shall proceed according to the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio that pertain to the termination of parental rights or adoption of a minor child. Appellee’s memorandum in response shall be filed no later than 20 days from the date of this entry.
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Business Guidance Resources Refine your results
  Refine your results
    Business Guidance Resources
            
              
Filtros
      Topics
  
  
  

  - Cualquiera -Advertising and Marketing-Advertising and Marketing Basics-Children-Endorsements, Influencers, and Reviews-Environmental Marketing-Health Claims-Made in USA-Online Advertising and Marketing-TelemarketingCredit and Finance-Credit and Loans-Debt-Debt Collection-FinTech-Mortgages-Payments and BillingPrivacy and Security-Children's Privacy-Health Privacy-Consumer Privacy-Credit Reporting-Data Security-Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act-Red Flags Rule-Data Privacy Framework-Privacy Shield-U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework-TechSelf-RegulationSmall Business
Selected Industries
  
  
  

  - Cualquiera -AlcoholAppliancesAutomobilesClothing and TextilesFinanceFranchises, Business Opportunities, and InvestmentsHuman ResourcesJewelryNon-ProfitsReal Estate and MortgagesTobaccoDisplaying 1 - 3 of 3
        
        
                  No results found.
        
        
                  Displaying 1 - 3 of 3
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00149

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tarrant County , Texas Trial Court No. 352

- 290806

- 17
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### M ATTHEW 

### M URRAY AND 

### C OCA



### - C OLA 

### R EFRESHMENTS 

### USA, I NC



### . ,

Appellants and Cross

- Appellees

V


### . S TEPHEN 

### W

ATS ON AND 

### L

YNNDORA 

### R

ANSOM 

### , I NDIVIDUALLY 

### , AND ON 

### B EHALF OF 

### D ESMOND 

### J ONES 

### , D ECEASED 

### , Appellees and Cross

Appellants2 MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 10, 2019, and May 24, 2019, we notified cross

- appellants Stephen Watson and Lynndora Ransom, Individually, and on Behalf of Desmond Jones,
Deceased , in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would
dismiss th e cross

- appeal unless the $205 filing fee was paid See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Cross

- a ppellant s have not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).
Because cross

- appellant s have not complied with a procedural requirement and the Texas Supreme Cou rt’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the cross

- appeal of Stephen Watson and Lynndora Ransom, Individually, and on Behalf of Desmond Jones , Deceased

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
Cross

- a ppellant s must pay all costs of th e cross

- appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: June 6, 2019

1 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2567

To amend the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950 to authorize the use

of civil air defense sirens to warn persons living near prison facilities

of the escape of an inmate of the facility.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend the Federal Civil Defense Act of 1950 to authorize

the use of civil air defense sirens to warn persons living

near prison facilities of the escape of an inmate of the

facility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prisoner Escape Alarm

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 2567 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF CIVIL AIR DEFENSE SIRENS UPON PRISON

2 ESCAPES.

3 (a) USE AUTHORIZED.—Title II of the Federal Civil

4 Defense Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2281 et seq.) is

5 amended by adding at the end the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 208. AUTHORIZED USES OF CIVIL AIR DEFENSE

7 SIRENS.

8 ‘‘The Director of the Federal Emergency Manage9 ment Agency may authorize the use of civil air defense

10 sirens located near a Federal, State, or local prison facility

11 to warn persons living near the facility of the escape of

12 an inmate of the facility. The Director shall prescribe by

13 rule the manner in which the sirens may be used, and the

14 signal that may be used, to provide such warning.’’.

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents

16 in the first section of such Act is amended by inserting

17 after the item relating to section 207 the following new

18 item:

‘‘Sec. 208. Authorized uses of civil air defense sirens.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                   ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
Esposito, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 5, 2005                                        Joseph Esposito
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Joseph Esposito,
                                                       President and Chief
                                                       Executive Officer

This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF the PAUMA & YUIMA RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, aka Pauma Luiseno Band of Mission Indians, aka Pauma Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Appellee., v. State of CALIFORNIA; California Gambling Control Commission, an agency of the State of California; Arnold Schwarzenegger, as Governor of the State of California, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 10-55713.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 2010.

Filed Nov. 30, 2010.

Kevin Michael Cochrane, Cheryl A. Williams, Esquire, Williams & Cochrane LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

Teresa Michelle Laird, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before: SCHROEDER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and JARVEY, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

ORDER **

This case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration of all four of the *Winter*factors *(see Winter v. Natural Res. Def Council,*555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008)), and to reanalyze them in light of our recent decisions in Alliance *for Wild Rockies v. Cottrell,*622 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir.2010) (amended Sept. 22, 2010) (articulating a postWmier “sliding-scale” test), and *Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Cmty. v. California,*618 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir.2010) (altering the Eastern District Court of California’s interpretation of the IGRA Compact formula for determining the total number of Class III gaming licenses at issue). If upon reconsideration the district court determines injunctive relief is warranted, it must justify any alteration of the status quo. *See Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.,*316 F.2d 804 (9th Cir.1963).

Should there be another challenge to the district court’s decision on remand regard*21ing the propriety of continuing injunctive relief, the district court is directed to expeditiously proceed to address the merits of the underlying Compact litigation during the pendency of any further interlocutory appeal. *See Britton v. Co-op Banking Grp.,*916 F.2d 1405, 1412 (9th Cir.1990) (“[A]n appeal of an interlocutory order does not ordinarily deprive the district court of jurisdiction except with regard to the matters that are the subject of the appeal”) (citing *Manual for Complex Litigation*§§ 25.11, 25.16 (2d Ed.)).

Because this case is remanded to the district court, Appellee’s July 15, 2010, motion to take judicial notice is denied as moot. The injunction is to stay in effect pending the district court’s reconsideration. Each party shall bear its own costs. The panel will retain jurisdiction over any subsequent appeals.

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*April 2, 2010*

[Cite as *04/02/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-1463.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

1990-0291.

#### State v. Durr.

Cuyahoga App. No. 57140. By warrant of reprieve issued by the governor filed October 5, 2009, appellant’s sentence was ordered to be carried out on Tuesday, April 20, 2010. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant’s sentence,

It is ordered by the court that the Chief Justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including but not limited to the filing requirements imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.1.

It is further ordered that service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.2, shall be personal, by facsimile transmission, or by email.

It is further ordered that counsel of record for the parties shall provide this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in or issued by any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the office of the Clerk as soon as possible, either personally, by facsimile transmission, or by email.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2784 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2784

    To reauthorize the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2018

 Mr. Heller (for himself, Mr. Casey, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Coons, and Mr. 
    Cornyn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reauthorize the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SERVICES.

    Section 303 of the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (42 
U.S.C. 10403) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``2011 through 2015'' 
        and inserting ``2019 through 2023'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``2011 through 2015'' 
        and inserting ``2019 through 2023''; and
            (3) in subsection (c), by striking ``2011 through 2015'' 
        and inserting ``2019 through 2023''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SABRANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Appiant Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, that to his knowledge:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  August 19, 2002                            /s/  DOUGLAS S. ZORN
                                                   ---------------------

                                                   President, Chief Executive
                                                   Officer and Acting Chief
                                                   Financial Officer


<PAGE>
# PHR_NRs_2014

# Phr_reg_2014_Q1_Q3

# Phr_reg_2014_Q4

# PHR_NRs_2015

# Phr_reg_2015_Q1_Q3

# Phr_reg_2015_Q4

# PHR_NRs_2016

# Phr_reg_2016_Q1_Q3

# Phr_reg_2016_Q4

# PHR_NRs_2017

# Phr_reg_2017_Q1_Q3

# Phr_reg_2017_Q4
2. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS MODIFICATION? (Check and fill in the blanks for all of the items listed below that apply)

1. PLEASE SPECIFY THE INTERAGENCY ORDER NUMBER:

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE 

REIMBURSABLE FUNDS TRANSFER ACTIONS

A reimbursable agreement is the reimbursement of funds from one government agency (the servicing/performing agency) to another

government agency (the requesting/ordering agency) to provide goods or services via reimbursable orders.

Answer the questions below for all modifications

FSIS FORM 1210-14 (06/15/2009)

Change in value. The new value is: 

Change in period of performance. The new period of performance is:

Add new work (attach a revised Statement of Work, if applicable).

Continuation of a current effort.

Administrative (e.g. change COTR). The administrative change needed is:

Other (Please specify):

TECHNICAL CONTACT

Please sign and date below:

DATE
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2776

To designate ‘‘The Most Beautiful Lady in the World’’, by Helmut Christopher Calabrese and Paul L. Calabrese, as the official anthem of the

Statue of Liberty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To designate ‘‘The Most Beautiful Lady in the World’’,

by Helmut Christopher Calabrese and Paul L. Calabrese,

as the official anthem of the Statue of Liberty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This legislation may be cited as the ‘‘Official Anthem

5 of the Statue of Liberty’’.

6 SEC. 2. AN HONORED TRIBUTE.

7 Whereas on the one hundredth anniversary of the

8 dedication of the world’s most revered monument of free9 dom, the Statue of Liberty was honored by a chorus of
2

•HR 2776 IH

1 schoolchildren singing ‘‘The Most Beautiful Lady in the

2 World’’ written and composed by Helmut C. Calabrese and

3 Paul L. Calabrese. This profound expression of emotion

4 was an inspirational dedication to the Statue of Liberty’s

5 long service as a beacon of hope and gateway of oppor6 tunity.

7 SEC. 3. INTENTION OF CONGRESS.

8 It is the intent of the One Hundred Third Congress

9 to memorialize ‘‘The Most Beautiful Lady in the World’’

10 and dedicate it as the official anthem of the Statue of Lib11 erty. Helmut and Paul Calabrese’s song is a tribute to

12 the Statue of Liberty and should be preserved for genera13 tions to come.

Æ