alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Student Handout- Module Number Eleven (11) - Retorts— Processing With Overpressure 

Retorts— Processing With Overpressure 

Overpressure: Pressure supplied to a retort in excess of the normal pressure exerted by the 

heating medium at a given temperature and is used to: 

 To maintain container integrity 

 To permit adequate processing 

Overpressure requirements vary: 

- Too much at the start of the process could distort containers (crush containers) or 

damage seals 

- Too little during heating could lead to container rupture or seal damage, slow heat 

penetration, or interfere with water circulation patterns in the retort 

- Too little during cooling could lead to container rupture or seal damage 

Factors affecting overpressure requirements: 

 Product fill temperature 

 Container headspace 

 Container vacuum 

 Entrapped air 

 Processing temperature 

Each retort must have a pressure recording device 

Each retort should have pressure gauge 

Each retort must have a means of providing uniform HD/TD during processing 

The efficiency of the circulation system must be documented in HD/TD data or other 

documentation from a Processing Authority 

HD/TD data must be on file at the establishment to support the retort operating procedures 

General Characteristics of Retorts that Provide Overpressure: 

 Introduced steam or air is the source of overpressure 

 Batch processing, not continuous container handling 

 Static (still), rotary (end-over-end), and back and forth (Shaka®process) agitation 

models 

Page 1 

Page 1 
lrll!l.£D~ 

I 

Picture of retort with the SHAKA agitation 

Factors that may Affect Heat Distribution or Processing Medium Circulation: 

- Operating pressure 

- Come-up procedures 

- Partial loads 

- Fan or pump off or not functioning properly 

Retorts that Provide Overpressure 

- water immersion, 

- cascading water, 

- water spray 

- steam/air mixture 

Page 2 

Page 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-4253]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Homestake Mining Company, Homestake Gold Mine, Lead, South Dakota.  The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination.  Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

NAFTA-4253; Homestake Mining Company, Homestake Gold Mine, Lead, South Dakota (February 22, 2001)

Signed at Washington, DC this 22nd day of February, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 01-5088  Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
| Commercial        Loans Mortgage        LoansOther        LoansREOJudgmentsSecuritiesOther AssetsEquity in SubsDeficiencies20.0%    2.8%0.1%0.8%1.2%22.7%44.3%7.2%0.8%
                      Source: Reports from FDIC Division of Finance

Back to Chart
 19992000200120022003Other3,820    3,3953,1812,0971,994Liquidation753468454522520    Supervision    2,6932,5892,5322,8112,797Total7,2666,4526,1675,4305,311

                      Source: FDIC, 2003 Annual Report

Back          to Chart |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4997]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Treasury Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of the U.S. 
Customs Service

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the date, time, and location for the 
quarterly meeting of the Treasury Advisory Committee on Commercial 
Operations (COAC), and the provisional agenda for consideration by the 
Committee.

DATES: The next meeting of the Treasury Advisory Committee on 
Commercial Operations of the U.S. Customs Service will be held on 
Friday, March 23, 2001 at 9 a.m. at the Omni Colonnade Hotel, located 
at 180 Aragon Avenue, Coral Gables, FL 33134 (Tel: 305-441-2600, Fax: 
305-444-9706) The meeting is being hosted by Gilbert Lee Sandler, 
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., 5200 Blue Lagoon Drive, #600, Miami, 
FL 33126. The duration of the meeting will be approximately four hours 
(9a to 1p).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy E. Skud, Acting Deputy 
Assistant Secretary, Regulatory, Tariff and Trade (Enforcement), Office 
of the Under Secretary (Enforcement), Telephone: (202) 622-0230.
    At this meeting, the Advisory Committee is expected to pursue the 
following agenda. The agenda may be modified prior to the meeting.

Agenda

(1) Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF)
(2) CAT (Compliance Assessment Team) Sub Committee
(3) OR & R (Office of Rules & Regulation) Sub Committee
(4) Import Data & Customs entry Sub Committee
(5) Port Uniformity Initiative
(6) Customs Authorization Bills
(7) Status of Customs & Treasury Comments on Revision to Kyoto 
Convention

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public; however, 
participation in the Committee's deliberations is limited to Committee 
members, Customs and Treasury Department staff, and persons invited to 
attend the meeting for special presentations. A person other than an 
Advisory Committee member who wishes to attend the meeting should 
contact Theresa Manning at (202) 622-0220 or Helen Belt at (202) 622-
0230 for pre-clearance.

    Dated: February 26, 2001.
Timothy E. Skud,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Regulatory, Tariff, and Trade 
(Enforcement).
[FR Doc. 01-4997 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-U
[No. 57902-9-I.

Division One.

September 17, 2007.]

#### Deborah Ann Hanson, *Appellant,*v. Jonathan Chinn et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-2-20134-1, Palmer Robinson and Michael S. Spearman, JJ., entered December 27, 2005 and February 6, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Schindler, A.C.J., and Baker, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit. 99.1

                  CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 12 INCORPORATED


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, William Polk Carey, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Gordon F. DuGan, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of our knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/   William Polk Carey                     /s/ Gordon F. DuGan
      -------------------------                  ----------------------
      William Polk Carey                         Gordon F. DuGan
      Chairman                                   Vice Chairman
      (Co-Chief Executive Officer)               (Co-Chief Executive Officer)

           3/25/03                                     3/25/03
      -------------------------                  ----------------------
      Date                                       Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for RTCA Government/Industry Certification Steering Committee meeting to be held March 23, 2000, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, in the Bessie Coleman Conference Center, Room 2AB.

The agenda will include: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Previous Meeting Minutes; (3) Review Meeting Agenda; (4) Certification Select Committee Progress Report; (5) Working Group Report on Implementation of Task Force 4 Recommendations; (6) Update and Demonstration of FAA Web Site Redesign; (7) Other Business; (8) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (9) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the co-chairmen, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

      ( print page 13122)    
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 23, 2001.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 01-5138  Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
|  | 1.  |  Trust      hereby acknowledges that the unpaid and outstanding principal balance on      the Note was $350,000 as of December 18,2007; |
|--|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2.  |  Trust      hereby waives any Default (as defined in the Note) that may exist as of      the date of execution of this letteragreement; |
|--|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 3.  |  The      Maturity Date (as defined in the Note) is hereby extended to July 31,      2008; |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 4.  |  Rim      shall use its best efforts to make prepayments of principal in an amount      equal to or greater than $50,000 per month, together with all accrued      interest as of the date of such prepayment, no later than the last      calendar day of each month. |
|--|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| THE      CHARLES R. CONO TRUST                                                                                                                                                                |      |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                          |      |
|                                                                                                                                                                                          |      |
|                                                                                                                                                                                          |      |
| By: /s/      Charles R.      Cono                           | 3-20-2008 |
| Charles      R. Cono, Trustee                                                                                                                                                                 | Date      |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecilio Daniel CAZARES-VALLEJO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50988

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*369PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cecilio Daniel Cazares-Vallejo raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2793 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2793

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 3 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                     For the relief of Kris Murty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES FOR KRIS MURTY.

    For the purpose of receiving reimbursement for relocation expenses 
under sections 5724 and 5724a of title 5, United States Code, Kris 
Murty of El Paso, Texas, an employee of the Department of the Army, is 
deemed to have been an employee transferred by the Department of the 
Army from one official station to another for permanent duty when he 
relocated from Houston, Texas, to Fort Bliss, Texas, in February 1985.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    No amount exceeding 10 percent of a payment made pursuant to 
section 1 may be paid to or received by any agent or attorney in 
consideration for services rendered in connection with the payment. Any 
person who violates the provisions of this section shall be guilty of 
an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided 
under title 18, United States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                Clerk.
```
#### Sohn Manufacturing Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, Secura Insurance, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Labor and Industry Review Commission and Tanya Wetor, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court

*No. 2012AP2566.*

*Oral argument September 23, 2014.*

*Decided October*7, *2014.*

2014 WI 112

(Also reported in 854 N.W.2d 371.)

For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs by *Steven A. Nigh, Charles B. Palmer, Denise L.*
      *309
      *Greathouse, Kelly R. Rourke,*and *Michael Best & Friedrich LLP,*Waukesha. Oral argument by *Steven A. Nigh.*

For the defendant-respondent Labor and Industry Review Commission, the cause was argued by *Anthony D. Russomanno,*assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was *J.B. Van Hollen,*attorney general.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is evenly divided upon the question of affirmance or reversal. That results in affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals and thus of the Labor and Industry Review Commission. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would affirm. Justice Patience Drake Roggensack, Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Michael J. Gableman would reverse. Justice David T. Prosser did not participate. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00006-CV

South Coast Spine & Rehabilitation, PA

v.

Brownsville Independent School District

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2008-CCL-01297

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 12, 2019
Order filed, December 30, 2019

.

In The


## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 19

- 00996

- CV

____________

WATER RELEASE VICTIM S OF NORTHEAST HOUST ON , Appellant

V.

THE TEXAS WATER DEVE LOPMENT BOARD AND TH E SAN

JACINTO RIVER AUTHOR ITY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 56901



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 27, 2019

. See Tex. R.
App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record
has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Berry , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal

within 15 days of the date of this order

.

PE R CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain and Hassan.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Disaboom Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                                                                   
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 20, 2008 | By /s/ John Walpuck
     John Walpuck, Principal Financial Officer

---
Exhibit
      32.01





Certification





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”)
      of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
      10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2007


By:
              /s/
                  Bernard AlbaneseBernard
                  Albanese
                Chairman
                    of the Board and
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer


The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code).