alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form 8966

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

FATCA Report

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8966 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-2246

2019

If you are filing paper Forms 8966, enter the three-digit identifier number used to identify this Form 8966 filing 

(see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

Check if report is being corrected, amended, voided, or there are no accounts to report:

Corrected report Amended report Voided report Check if no accounts to report (see instructions)

Part I Identification of Filer

1a Name of filer 1b Enter the filer category (see instructions) ▶

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State, province, or region 3c Country, including postal code 

4 Global intermediary identification number (GIIN)

. . .

5 TIN

6 Name of sponsored entity or intermediary, if applicable

7 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

8a City or town 8b State, province, or region 8c Country, including postal code 

9 GIIN

. . .

10 TIN

Part II Account Holder or Payee Information

1a Name of account holder or payee 1b Indicate whether account holder or payee is an individual or entity

Individual Entity

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State, province, or region 3c Country, including postal code 

4 TIN

5 If account holder or payee is an entity, check applicable box to specify the entity type:

Owner-Documented FFI with specified U.S. Owner(s) Passive NFFE with substantial U.S. Owner(s)

Non-Participating FFI Specified U.S. Person

Part III Owner Information (File a separate report for each U.S. Owner that is a specified U.S. Person.)

1 Name of owner

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State, province, or region 3c Country, including postal code 

4 TIN of owner

Part IV Financial Information

1 Account number 2 Currency code (see instructions)

3a Account balance

3b Check if account closed during the year (see instructions)

4a Interest

4b Dividends

4c Gross proceeds/Redemptions

4d Other

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 55748F Form 8966 (2019) 
Form 8966 (2019) Page 2 

Part V Pooled Reporting Type

1 Check applicable pooled reporting type (check only one):

Recalcitrant account holders with U.S. Indicia

Dormant accounts

Recalcitrant account holders that are U.S. Persons

Recalcitrant account holders without U.S. Indicia

Non-Participating FFI

Recalcitrant account holders that are passive NFFEs

2 Number of accounts 3 Aggregate payment amount

4 Aggregate account balance 5 Currency code

Form 8966 (2019)
H. R. 2555

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in Cincinnati,

Ohio, as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Potter Stewart

United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Potter

Stewart United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[No. 34570-6-II.

Division Two.

September 25, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Manuel Ortiz-Santiago, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 05-1-00938-9, Stephen M. Warning, J., entered November 2, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and QuinnBrintnall, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2686 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2686

    To amend the Small Business Act to reduce the interest rates on 
disaster loans provided by the Small Business Administration for losses 
  resulting from flooding in Midwest communities participating in the 
                   national flood insurance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1993

Mr. Wheat (for himself, Ms. Danner, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Clay, 
Mr. Volkmer, and Mr. Gephardt) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Small Business Act to reduce the interest rates on 
disaster loans provided by the Small Business Administration for losses 
  resulting from flooding in Midwest communities participating in the 
                   national flood insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF INTEREST RATES ON SBA DISASTER LOANS.

    (a) Interest Rate.--Section 7(c) of the Small Business Act (16 
U.S.C. 636(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(8)(A)(i) The interest rate on the Federal share of any loan made 
under subsection (b)(1) or (b)(2) for losses resulting from flooding in 
the Midwest during the period beginning on June 1, 1993, and ending on 
May 31, 1994, shall be 1 percent per year.
    ``(ii) With respect to any loan described in clause (i) which is 
outstanding on the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the 
Administrator shall make such change in the interest rate on the 
balance of such loan as is required under clause (i) effective as of 
such date of enactment.
    ``(B) Subparagraph (A) shall apply only to loans with respect to 
losses on property located in communities participating in the national 
flood insurance program.
    ``(C) No person receiving a loan pursuant to this paragraph may 
receive any disaster assistance under this Act or any other Federal law 
for losses resulting from any subsequent flooding disaster, unless such 
person (if eligible) has obtained flood insurance under the national 
flood insurance program for the property involved.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 7(c)(5) of such Act is amended 
by inserting ``except as provided by paragraph (8),'' after ``October 
1, 1982,''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Alonzo FRANK, Petitioner-Appellant v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL Eric Holder, Jr., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-20072

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 10, 2011.

Alonzo Frank, Richmond, TX, pro se.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alonzo Frank, Texas prisoner #82852, is currently serving a term of 99 years for aggravated robbery and a concurrent term of 60 years for aggravated assault imposed by a Texas state court. Both convictions arose out of the same events for which the federal district court had earlier convicted Frank of the following crimes and imposed the following concurrent prison sentences: conspiracy and aiding and abetting, 60 months; bank robbery and aiding and abetting, 294 months; obstruction of interstate commerce and aiding and abetting, 240 months; and possession of a firearm by a felon, 180 months. Additionally, and also as a result of the same events, the district court convicted Frank of using a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence and sentenced him to a 60-month term, with that sentence to run consecutively to the concurrent sentences. Frank is still in state custody; his federal sentences have yet to begin.

Frank appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the decision of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) not to credit his federal sentences with time that he has served on his state sentences. The district court dismissed the petition on the pleadings. In gist, Frank argues that the BOP has constructively stacked his prison terms illegally, that the federal sentences and the state sentences should be viewed as essentially one sentence because they all derive from one incident, and that the “illegal stacking” violates his due process and equal protection rights and subjects him to cruel and unusual punishment and double jeopardy.

We review de novo a district court decision to deny § 2241 relief on the pleadings. *Pack v. Yusuff,*218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir.2000). For the reasons that follow, Frank is unable to show that de novo *838review requires reversal of the district court.

“[A] defendant shall be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in official detention prior to the date the sentence commences ... that has not been credited against another sentence.” 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b). Here, however, the record shows that the period of time for which Frank seeks credit against his federal sentences is and has been credited against his state sentences. Thus, the BOP properly determined that Frank was not entitled under § 3585(b) to a credit for the time spent serving his state sentences.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14


OF
THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT





I, Ben
Wang, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of RINO
International Corporation (the “registrant”) for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. [Intentionally
omitted]





4. [Intentionally
omitted]





5. [Intentionally
omitted]




Date:
      September 13, 2010
                /s/ Ben WangBen
      Wang
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  (principal
      financial officer)
Change ACH Information 

Go to: https://www.fdicconnect.gov

 Sign-in 

 Press continue 

 If the "Assessment Actions" transaction is turned on, go to Step 1 below 

 Select “Coordinator Functions” from the FDICconnect Business Center Menu 

 Select “Manage Transactions” 

 Click on the radio button (in the select column) next to “Assessment Actions” 

 Click the “Manage Transaction Users” button at the bottom of the screen 

 Select “Execute” in the “Privileges” column next to your name 

 Click the “Update Privileges” button on the bottom of the screen 

 Select “Menu” (in the upper right corner) to return to the Business Center Menu 

1. Select Deposit Insurance Assessment 

2. Select Assessment Actions 

3. Click the tab “Update ACH Information” 

4. Complete the required elements on the screen 

5. Place a checkmark in the Acknowledgment Box at the bottom of the screen 

6. Press Submit 

If you need assistance, please contact the FDICconnect Helpdesk at 877-275-3342 (Select 

Option 4) or 703-516-1069 or email fdicconnect@fdic.gov.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-28 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christian D. Woych, Appellant.

[3 NYS3d 574]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Ward, J.), rendered on or about July 15, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Brandon Darby, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Erin Tomlinson of counsel), for appellant.Queens County District Attorney (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill and Deborah E. Wassel of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ernest F. Hart, J.), rendered December 4, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>;<i> Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 16, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust,
            Series 2007-B (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
            whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
            in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
            not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
            in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
            disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
            fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
            material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
            of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
            this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank
      of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2008

/s/ Steve Bailey
-----------------
Steve Bailey
Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan
Administration
(Senior officer in charge of the servicing
function of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2577 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2577

   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
 operation of certain visitor facilities associated with, but outside 
    the boundaries of, Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of 
                               Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 
 operation of certain visitor facilities associated with, but outside 
    the boundaries of, Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of 
                               Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``The Fall River Visitor Center Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS OUTSIDE AUTHORIZED BOUNDARY OF ROCKY 
              MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Visitor Center.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 
expend donated or appropriated funds for the operation and maintenance 
of a visitor center to be constructed for visitors to and 
administration of Rocky Mountain National Park with private funds on 
the privately owned lands described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Parcels of Land.--The lands referred to in 
subsection (a) are described as follows:
            Being land owned by H.W. Stewart, Inc., and more 
        particularly described as follows:
                    Beginning at the southwest corner of the north one-
                half of section 16, township 5 north, range 73 west of 
                the sixth principal meridian, Colorado; thence south 
                eighty-seven degrees six minutes east, eight hundred 
                and fifty-four feet; thence north two degrees west, 
                three hundred and forty-six and one-tenth feet to the 
                south boundary of the right-of-way of U.S. Highway 34; 
                thence northwesterly along said south boundary nine 
                hundred and sixty feet to the west line of said section 
                16; thence south along the west line of said section 16 
                to the point of beginning.

                                 <all>
```
#### Isidora Bernal FLORES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72999.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Martin A. Robles, Esq., Law Offices of Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Rhonda M. Dent, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights/Disability Rights Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Isidora Bernal Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the *670Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Flores’ motion to reopen as untimely because it was filed over nine months after the BIA’s final order of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the final administrative removal order).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its *sua sponte*authority to reopen proceedings, and we are not persuaded by Flores’ attempts to circumvent this jurisdictional bar. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002) (“Because we cannot discover a sufficiently meaningful standard against which to judge the BIA’s decision not to reopen ... we hold that we do not have jurisdiction to review the [petitioner’s] claim that the BIA should have exercised its *sua sponte*power”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.