alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 Entity
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation or FormationAsia-hotels.com Limited
    
    Hong KongCallbookers Limited
    
    EnglandCarbookers Limited
    
    EnglandCheap Tickets Limited
    
    EnglandCheap Tickets Europe Limited
    
    EnglandCruisebookers Limited
    
    Englandebookers Limited
    
    Englandebookers.com Deutschland GmbH
    
    GermanyEbookers.com Limited
    
    Englandebookers.com SA
    
    Switzerlandebookers.ie Ltd
    
    Irelandebookers.nl BV
    
    Netherlandsebookers.no AS
    
    Norwayebookers Scandinavia AB
    
    SwedenFlairview Travel Hotel Club S.L.
    
    SpainFlairview Travel Limited
    
    EnglandFlairview Travel Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaFlightbookers Limited
    
    EnglandHotel Bookers Limited
    
    EnglandHotel Club Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaHotelclub Limited
    
    EnglandHotelClub KK
    
    JapanInsurancebookers Limited
    
    EnglandInternetwork Publishing Corporation
    
    FloridaLa Compagnie Des Voyages SA
    
    FranceMr Jet A/S
    
    DenmarkMr Jet AS (Norway)
    
    NorwayMr Jet Oy (Finland)
    
    FinlandNational Internet Travel Agency
    
    FloridaNeat Group Corporation
    
    DelawareO Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz Away, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Financial Corp.
    
    DelawareOrbitz for Business, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz International Inc.
    
    NevisOrbitz (Israel) Ltd.
    
    IsraelOrbitz, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Mexico Operations, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoOrbitz Mexico Services, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoOrbitz Travel Insurance Services, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide (UK) Limited
    
    EnglandOrbitz Worldwide Development, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide International, Inc.
    
    DelawareOWW Fulfillment Services, Inc.
    
    TennesseeOy ebookers Finland Ltd
    
    FinlandParagon Travel Limited (ROHQ) Philippines Inc.
    
    PhilippinesParagon Travel (S) Pte Limited
    
    SingaporeParagon Travel Limited
    
    Hong KongRaccoon Acquisition I, LLC
    
    DelawareStudentbookers.com Limited
    
    EnglandTerren Corporation
    
    CanadaTravel Acquisition, LLC
    
    DelawareTravel Acquisition Corporation Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaTrip Network, Inc.
    
    DelawareViajes ebookers S.L.
    
    SpainWorldbookers Limited
    
    England
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 287 

To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 

inclusion in, the Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage 

available for inclusion in, the Florissant Fossil Beds 

National Monument. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAP UPDATE; MAXIMUM ACREAGE AVAILABLE 

4 FOR INCLUSION IN THE FLORISSANT FOSSIL 

5 BEDS NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

6 The first section of Public Law 91–60 (83 Stat. 101) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘entitled ‘Proposed Florissant 

9 Fossil Beds National Monument’, numbered NM– 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 287 IS

1 FFB–7100, and dated March 1967, and more par2 ticularly described by metes and bounds in an at3 tachment to that map,’’ and inserting ‘‘entitled 

4 ‘Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument Pro5 posed Boundary Adjustment’, numbered 171/ 

6 132,544, and dated May 3, 2016,’’; and 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘six thousand acres’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘6,300 acres’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Visitors to the U.S. Naval Academy

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors will meet to make 
such inquiry as the Board shall deem necessary into the state of morale 
and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal 
affairs, and academic methods of the Naval Academy. During this meeting 
inquiries will relate to the internal personnel rules and practices of 
the Academy, may involve ongoing criminal investigations, and include 
discussions of personal information the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The 
Executive Session of this meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, March 5, 2001, from 8:30 
a.m. to 11:45 a.m. The closed Executive Session will be from 10:50 a.m. 
to 11:45 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Bo Coppedge Dining Room of 
Alumni Hall at the U.S. Naval Academy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Thomas E. Osborn, 
Executive Secretary to the Board of Visitors, Office of the 
Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, telephone 
number (410) 293-1503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of partially closed meeting is 
provided per the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2). The 
Executive Session of the meeting will consist of discussions of 
information which pertain to the conduct of various midshipmen at the 
Naval Academy and internal Board of Visitors matters. Discussion of 
such information cannot be adequately segregated from other topics, 
which precludes opening the Executive Session of this meeting to the 
public. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. app. 2, section 10(d), the 
Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that the special 
committee meeting shall be partially closed to the public because they 
will be concerned with matters as outlined in sections 552(b)(2), (5), 
(6), and (7) of title 5, U.S.C. Due to unavoidable delay in 
administrative processing, the normal 15 days notice could not be 
provided.

    Dated: February 28, 2001.
James L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-5273 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 Exhibit 23.2


                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 21, 1998, included in
the Company's 1997 Annual Report. It should be noted that we have not audited
any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31, 1997, or
performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


                                                  /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 March 27, 1998
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “Report”) of Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2014, I, T. Michael Ansley, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  October 28, 2015DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.By:/s/ T. Michael AnsleyT. Michael AnsleyChairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chase Packaging Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ann W.
Green, Assistant Secretary and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Ann W. Green
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Ann W. Green
                                                     Assistant Secretary and
                                                     Principal Financial Officer

August 2, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

s1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141106 

DURAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 

Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellant, 

v SC: 141106 

 COA: 287722 

 Kent CC: 06-007152-CZ 

CARL PERRIN, 

Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellee, 

and 

PERRIN EXCAVATING, LLC and OUTLAW 

EXCAVATING, LLC, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Order entered Febr uary 5, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 19

- 01551

- CV

WARREN CHEN AND DYNA COLOR, INC., Appellant s

V.

RAZBERI TECHNOLOGIES , INC., THOMAS J. GA LVIN, LIVEOAK VENTURE PARTNERS I , L.P., LIVEOAK VENTURES PAR TNERS 1A, L.P., KENNETH L. AND VIRGINIA T. BOYDA, AS TRUSTEES OF THE

BOYDA FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST DAT ED 10/12/1990, AND J IRI AND ROSEMARY MODRY, AS TRUSTEES OF THE J RAM TRUST UDT 8/12/1996 , Appell ee s

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 16568

ORDER Before Justices Schenck, Smith, and Garcia

Before the Court are appellees’ January 14, 2021 motion for rehearing ;

January 15, 2021 mot ion f or en banc reconsideration; and February 2, 2021 motion

for emergency relief and expedited consideration of motions for rehearin g and en

banc reconsideration.We ORDER the parties’ briefing to be filed as follows:

1. Appellants ’ briefing on the merits and their responses to appellees’ January 14, 2021 motion for rehearing and their February 2, 2021 motion for emergency relief and expedited consideration of motions for rehearing and en banc reconsideration shall be filed on or before 20 days from the date of this order ;

2. Appellees ’ briefing in response to appellants’ opening brief on the merits shall be filed on or before 20 days from the date appellants file their brief ; and

3. Appellants ’ reply if any shall be filed on or before 15 days from the date appell ees file their response brief

.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.6.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          61,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,015,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                   109,320
<INVENTORY>                                     15,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,191,284
<PP&E>                                         450,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 302,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,852,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,289,817
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,842
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,035,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,852,957
<SALES>                                      1,586,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,586,963
<CGS>                                        1,119,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,654,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,245,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,245,865)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         469,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,150,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,088,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,879,018
<PP&E>                                       5,203,969
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,728,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,094,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,556,559
<BONDS>                                      2,362,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,832
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,017,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,094,815
<SALES>                                      9,530,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,530,711
<CGS>                                        5,327,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,385,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             127,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (132,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (82,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                930,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   847,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
#### Bruce EKLUND, an individual, Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant-Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE MUNICIPAL COURT, a municipal corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-plaintiff-Appellee, Fred Bonner; Jane Doe Bonner; Gayle Tajima; John Doe Tajima, and their marital community; Yolande Williams; John Doe Williams, and their marital community; Mark Parcher; Jane Doe Parcher, and their marital community, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-35652.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 6, 2010.

Filed Nov. 24, 2010.

Mark K. Davis, Duncan C. Turner, Esquire, Badgley Mullins Law Group, PLLC, Charles Cleveland Stockmeyer, Cleveland Stockmeyer, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-eounter-claim-defendant-Appel-lant.

Amy Lowen, City of Seattle Law Department, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee, Fred Bonner.

Erin L. Overbey, Esquire, Seattle City Attorney’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-counter-claimanb-plaintiff-Appel-lee/Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CANBY, NOONAN and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Bruce Eklund appeals from the district court’s order granting immunity and awarding attorneys’ fees and statutory penalties to defendants Gayle Tajima, Mark Parcher, and Yolande Williams pursuant to Washington’s anti-SLAPP statute, Wash. Rev. Code § 4.24.510. We review the district court’s statutory interpretation *de novo*and the fee award for abuse of discretion. *Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Hoen,*538 F.3d 1128, 1132 (9th Cir.2008); *Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Winter,*543 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir.2008).

In a decision issued after the district court’s order in this case, the Washington Supreme Court found that the Washington anti-SLAPP statute grants immunity only to “a non-government individual or organization.” *Segaline v. State Dep’t of Labor & Indus.,*169 Wash.2d 467, 474, 238 P.3d 1107 (2010) (adopting the Washington Court of Appeals’ holding in *Skimming v.*
      *15
      *Boxer,*119 Wash.App. 748, 758, 82 P.3d 707 (2004)). As employees of the Seattle Municipal Court, Tajima, Parcher, and Williams are not immune from the claims against them. The award of attorneys’ fees and statutory penalties based on defendants’ success in their anti-SLAPP defense is accordingly vacated.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Keith Michael BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-7641.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 28, 2011.

Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Brown v. Johnson,*No. 2:10-cv-00510-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**EXHIBIT31.1****[beginson next page]**
 

 
Certification of the ServicerRE:  Nationstar Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-B (the “Trust”)I, Jay Bray, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to befiled in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nationstar HomeEquity Loan Trust 2007-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based onmy knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliancestatements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled theirobligations under the servicing agreements; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliancewith servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this reportin accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in thisreport. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me byJP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Bank of New York, American Security Insurance Company, StandardGuaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.(“Assurant”), and First AmericanReal Estate Solutions, L.P.Date: March 15, 2008                                                           /s/ Jay Bray   Jay Bray       Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer