Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2001 / Notices 13353

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Overview of This Information

(1) Type of Information Collection:

Extension of a currently approved

collection.

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: COPS

School-Based Partnership

Implementation Report.

(3) Agency form number, if any, and

the applicable component of the

Department of Justice sponsoring the

collection: Form: COPS PPSE/04. Office

of Community Oriented Policing

Services, U.S. Department of Justice.

(4) Affected public who will be asked

or required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract: Approximately 500 grant

project coordinators, school

administrators, and school resource

officers, who have participated in the

implementation of a COPS SchoolBased Partnership ’98 grant project, will

be asked to respond. The COPS SchoolBased Partnership Report will allow the

COPS office to collect information from

COPS School-Based Partnership ’98

grantees on the implementation of

collaborative problem-solving

techniques used to address crime and

disorder in and around schools. The

COPS office will use the information

collected to examine the processes

undertaken by SBP grantees in

implementing collaborative problemsolving techniques. A report of these

findings will identify lessons learned

and will provide recommendations to

policing agencies and schools seeking to

implement similar problem-solving

partnerships.

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond: Surveys will be administered

by mail to approximately 500 project

coordinators, school administrators, and

school resource officers, who have

participated in the implementation of a

COPS School-Based Partnership ’98

grant project. Survey completion will

take approximately 0.25 hours per

respondent (there is no recordkeeping

burden for this collection).

(6) An estimate of the public burden

(in hours) associated with the collection:

The estimated burden hours are 125.

If additional information is required

contact: Mrs. Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy

Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice, Information

Management and Security Staff, Justice

Management Division, Suite 1220,

National Place, 1331 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20530.

Dated: February 28, 2001.

Brenda E. Dyer,

Department Deputy Clearance Officer, United

States Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 01–5278 Filed 3–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–AT–M

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01–032]

NASA Advisory Council, Aero-Space

Technology Advisory Committee,

Aviation Operations Systems

Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and

Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

Federal Register Citation of Previous

Announcement: 66FR29, Notice

Number 01–022, February 12, 2001.

Previously Announced Dates of

Meeting: Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 1

p.m. to 5 p.m. and Thursday, March 29,

2001, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The meeting

will be rescheduled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Robert A. Jacobsen, National

Aeronautics and Space Administration,

Ames Research Center, Moffett Field,

CA 94035, 650/604–3743.

Dated:February 27, 2001.

Beth M. McCormick,

Advisory Committee Management Officer,

National Aeronautics and Space

Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–5213 Filed 3–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510–01–P

NORTHEAST DAIRY COMPACT

COMMISSION

Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Northeast Dairy Compact

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Compact Commission

will hold its regular monthly meeting to

consider matters relating to

administration and enforcement of the

price regulation, including the reports

and recommendations of the

Commission’s standing Committees.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 10 a.m.

on Wednesday, March 14, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Holiday Inn, 700 Elm Street,

Manchester, NH.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daniel Smith, Executive Director,

Northeast Dairy Compact Commission,

64 Main Street, Room 21, Montpelier,

VT 05602. Telephone (802) 229–1941.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7256

Dated: February 27, 2001.

Daniel Smith,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 01–5272 Filed 3–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1650–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50–317 and 50–318]

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc;

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit

Nos. 1 and 2; Exemption

1.0 Backround

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant,

Inc. (CCNPPI, the licensee) is the holder

of Renewed Facility Operating License

Nos. DPR–53 and DPR–69 which

authorize operation of the Calvert Cliffs

Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2

(CCNPP). The licenses provide, among

other things, that the facility is subject

to all rules, regulations, and orders of

the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC, the Commission)

now or hereafter in effect.

The facility consists of two

pressurized-water reactors located in

Calvert County, Maryland.

2.0 Purpose

Title 10 of the Code of Federal

Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix

G, requires that pressure-temperature

(P–T) limits be established for reactor

pressure vessels (RPVs) for normal

operating and hydrostatic or leak rate

testing conditions. Specifically, 10 CFR

part 50, Appendix G states, ‘‘The

appropriate requirements on both the

pressure-temperature limits and the

minimum permissible temperature must

be met for all conditions.’’ Appendix G

of 10 CFR Part 50 also states that the

‘‘P–T limits identified as ‘‘ASME

[American Society of Mechanical

Engineers] Appendix G limits’’ in Table

1 require that the limits must be at least

as conservative as limits obtained by