Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2001 / Notices 13085

Requirement No. of

respondents

No. of

responses

Estimated time per

response

Burden

hours

Conformance Report ............................................ 3,500 3,500 15 minutes ............................................................ 875

Unfunded Fringe Benefit Plans ............................ 6 6 6 hours ................................................................. 6

Total ............................................................... 3,506 3,506 ............................................................................... 881

Total Annualized Capital/Startup

Costs: $0.

Total Annual Costs (operating/

maintaining systems or purchasing

services): $1,297.

Description: 29 CFR section 5.5

requires Federal contractors to report on

conformed classifications and wage

rates and to submit requests for

approval of unfunded fringe benefit

plans to the Department of Labor. This

collection of information is necessary to

ensure that federal contractors are in

compliance with the Davis-Bacon and

Related Acts (DBRA) as well as the

Contract Work Hours and Safety

Standards Act (CWHSSA).

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Agency: Employment Standards

Administration (ESA).

Title: Rehabilitation Maintenance

Certification.

OMB Number: 1215–0155.

Affected Public: Individuals or

households.

Frequency: On occasion, annually,

and semi-annually.

Form

Number of

respondents/

responses

Frequency

Average

time per

form

Burden

hours

CA–5 .................................................................... 150 Once ............................................................ 90 225

CA–5b .................................................................. 20 Once ............................................................ 90 30

CA–1615 .............................................................. 600 Once ............................................................ 30 300

CA–1617 .............................................................. 300 Semiannually ............................................... 30 150

CA–1085 .............................................................. 500 Once ............................................................ 45 375

CA–1031 .............................................................. 150 Annually ....................................................... 15 37

CA–1074 .............................................................. 10 Once ............................................................ 60 10

CA–1093 .............................................................. 15 Once ............................................................ 30 7

CA–1618 .............................................................. 150 Semiannually ............................................... 30 75

Total .............................................................. 1,895 ...................................................................... .................... 1,210

Total Annualized Capital/Startup

Costs: $0.

Total Annual Costs (operating/

maintaining systems or purchasing

services): $0.

Description: These reports request

information from the survivors of

deceased Federal employees that verify

dependent status when making a claim

for benefits, and on a periodic basis in

accepted claims. Some of the forms are

used to obtain information in claimed

dependents in disability cases. The

collection of this information is required

to receive benefits under the Federal

Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA/

U.S.C. 8110) and are authorized by 20

CFR 10.7, 10.105, 10.410, 10.413,

10.417, 10.535, 10.537.

Ira L. Mills,

Departmental Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–5080 Filed 3–1–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–22–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of February, 2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated.

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–38,417; Wing Industries, Div. of

Atrium Companies, Inc., Mt.

Pleasant, TX

TA–W–38,437; SNE Enterprises, AWCCrestline Div., Commerce, TX

TA–W–38,336; Dunham Bush, Inc.,

Harrisonburg, PA

TA–W–38,133; UFE, Inc., El Paso, TX

TA–W–38,521; Burnt River Forest

Products, Inc., Unity, OR

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

13086 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2001 / Notices

TA–W–38,432; Singer Sewing Co.,

Industrial Div., Murfreesboro, TN

TA–W–38,513; Comdata, Inc.,

Birmingham, AL

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–38,107; Timex Corp., Little Rock,

AR

TA–W–38,391; Foxboro Co., Foxboro,

MA

TA–W–38,408; Williams Energy

Services, Bloomfield, MN

TA–W–38,496; Dynamic Metal Forming,

Inc., Koppel, PA

TA–W–38,337; Norton Co., Coated

Abrasives Div., Watervliet, NY

TA–W–38,358; Tower Automotive

Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo, MI

TA–W–38,412; Columbia Falls

Aluminum Co., Columbia Falls, MT

TA–W–38,321; International Paper Co.,

Lock Haven, PA

TA–W–38,594; Regional Recycling LLC,

Attalla, AL

TA–W–38,445; Burlington Resources,

Inc., Farmington, NM

TA–W–38,585; Portola Packaging, New

Castle, PA

TA–W–38,483; Saputo Cheese USA,

Inc., Thorp, WI

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

TA–W–38,439; Eastern Fine Paper, Inc.,

Brewer, ME

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location of each

determination references the impact

date for all workers of such

determination.

TA–W–38,486; Tyco Electronics, Irvine,

CA: December 11, 1999.

TA–W–38,300; ABB/Westinghouse,

Hematite Plant, Festus, MO:

October 17, 1999.

TA–W–37,970; Devro-Teepak, Inc.,

Danville, IL: July 31, 1999.

TA–W–38,561; Oshkosh B’ Gosh, Inc.,

Byrdstown Div., Byrdstown, TN:

January 8, 2000.

TA–W–38,590; Bianco Sportswear, Inc.,

Copiague, NY: January 3, 2000.

TA–W–38,438; Bend N’ Stretch, Cutting

Dept., Hialeah, FL: November 30,

1999.

TA–W–38,447; Pinebluff Manufacturing

Co., Pinebluff, NC: December 4,

1999.

TA–W–38,288; Middleby Marshall, Inc.,

Southbend Div., Including Leased

Workers of Express Temporary

Services, Fuquay Varina, NC:

October 23, 1999.

TA–W–38,402; Leroi International, Inc.,

DBA Compair, Sidney, OH:

November 15, 1999.

TA–W–38,592; Exide Technologies,

Automotive Battery Div., A/K/A

GNB Batteries, Inc., A/K/A Exide

Corp., Farmers Branch, TX: January

10, 2000.

TA–W–38,379; Trumark Industries,

Spokane, WA: November 8, 1999.

TA–W–38,283; Fernbrook #2, Palmerton,

PA: October 23, 1999.

TA–W–38,277; Camp Healthcare,

Jackson, MI: October 23, 1999.

TA–W–38,324; Remacor, West Pittsburg,

PA: October 23, 1999.

TA–W–38,460; Crompton and Knowles

Color, Inc., Nutley, NJ: December 5,

1999

TA–W–38,526; Victor Equipment Co.,

Abilene, TX: December 21, 1999

TA–W–38,330; Central Industries of

Indiana, Inc., Greenwood Arkansas

Div., Greenwood, AR: October 25,

1999.

TA–W–38,407; Tower Automotive

Products Co., Inc., Milwaukee, WI:

November 22, 1999.

TA–W–38,512; VF Imagewear (West),

Inc., Clarksville, TX: December 19,

1999.

TA–W–38,511; VF Imagewear (West),

Inc., Antlers, OK: December 19,

1999.

TA–W–38,315; DeBon Leather Goods,

Hackensack, NJ: October 20, 1999.

TA–W–38,567; Pirelli Tire North

America, Hanford, CA: January 9,

2000.

TA–W–38,459; Pennsylvania Steel Div.,

Pennsylvania Foundry Group,

Subsidiary of Atchinson Casting

Corp., Hamburg, PA: December 8,

1999.

TA–W–38,578; Berne Apparel Co., Inc.,

Hardinsburg, KY: January 5, 2000.

TA–W–38,270; General Electric Co.,

GEA Bloomington, Inc.,

Bloomington, IN: October 10, 1999.

TA–W–38,370; A.O. Smith Electrical

Products Co., Altavista, VA:

November 16, 1999.

TA–W–38,554; Lego Systems, Inc.,

Molding Dept., Enfield, CT: January

4, 2000.

TA–W–38,430; Unilever-Bestfoods,

Lipton, Dallas, TX: December 5,

1999.

TA–W–38,261; McNeil and NRM, Inc.,

Akron, OH: October 5, 1999.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with section

250(a), subchapter D, chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of February,

2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) That imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increased imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–04334; Cherokee

Finishing Co., Spartan

International, Gaffney, SC

NAFTA–TAA–04409; Burnt River Forest

Products, Inc., Unity, OR

NAFTA–TAA–04380; Wing Industries,

Div. of Atrium Companies, Inc., Mt

Pleasant, TX

NAFTA–TAA–04459; Pirelli Tire North

America, Hanford, CA

NAFTA–TAA–04241; Tower Automotive

Kalamazoo Business Unit,

Kalamazoo, MI

NAFTA–TAA–04384; Saputo Cheese

USA, Inc., Thorp, WI

NAFTA–TAA–04359; G&P Cutting

Contractors, Inc., d/b/a G&P

Logging Contractors, Inc., Parkdale,

OR

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2001 / Notices 13087

NAFTA–TAA–04246; National Mills,

Inc., Pittsburg, KS

NAFTA–TAA–04174; UFE, Inc., El Paso,

TX

NAFTA–TAA–04237; Middleby

Marshall, Inc., Southbend Div.,

Fuquay Varina, NC

NAFTA–TAA–04287; ABB/

Westinghouse, Hematite Plant,

Festus, MO

NAFTA–TAA–04446; Borg Wagner Air

Fluid Systems, Inc., Blytheville

Plant, Blytheville, AR

NAFTA–TAA–04355; SNE Enterprises,

AWC–Crestline Div., Commerce, TX

NAFTA–TAA–04371; Columbia Falls

Aluminum Co., Columbia Falls, MT

NAFTA–TAA–04482; Master Patern,

Inc., Norton Shores, MI

NAFTA–TAA–04367; Carolina Imprints,

Greenville, NC

The investigation revealed that the

criteria for eligibility have not been met

for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that

workers of the subject firm did not

produce an article within the meaning

of Section 250(a) of the Trade Act, as

amended.

NAFTA–TAA–04426; Southern Oregon

Log Scaling and Grading Bureau,

Roseburg, OR

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production, or both, of such firm or

subdivision did not decrease during the

relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–04470; Delbar Products,

Inc., Perkasie, PA

NAFTA–TAA–04365; Eastern Fine

Paper, Inc., Brewer, ME

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–04445; Burlington

Industries, Inc., Burlington House

Floor Accents, Monticello, AR:

January 3, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04361; Money’s Foods

U.S., Inc., Money’s Mushrooms Ltd,

Blandon, PA: December 1, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04338 & A, B; Wiscassett

Mills Co., Kannapolis, NC, Concord,

NC and Albemarle, NC: November

21, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04443; Berne Apparel

Co., Inc., Hardinsburg, KY: January

5, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04472; Portola Packaging,

New Castle, PA: January 10, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04417; VF Imagewear

(West), Inc., Antlers, OK: December

19, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04433; VF Imagewear

(West), Inc., Clarksville, TX:

December 19, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04456; Exide

Technologies/GNB Batteries, Inc.,

Leavenworth, KS: January 16, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04442; Oshkosh B’Gosh,

Inc., Byrdstown Div., Byrdstown,

TN: January 8, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04392; UnileverBestfoods, Lipton, Dallas, TX:

December 5, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04230; General Electric

Co., GEA Bloomington, Inc.,

Bloomington, IN: October 6, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04286; Poly One Corp.

(Formerly The Geon Co), Denver

Compound Plant, Denver, CO:

November 8, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04339; Tower Automotive

Products Co., Inc., Milwaukee, WI:

November 22, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04312; Trumark

Industries, Spokane, WA: November

8, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04310; Commonwealth

Sprague Capacitor, Inc.,

Components Div., Assembly and

Finishing Departments, North

Adams, MA: November 9, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04483; Vilter

Manufacturing Corp., Cudahy, WI:

January 10, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04419; TI Automotive

Group, New Haven Div., New

Haven, MI: January 3, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04388; Winpak Films,

Inc., Converting Department,

Senoia, GA: December 14, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04309; Kojo Worldwide

Corp., Huntington Beach, CA:

November 1, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04350; State Coat Front

Co., Inc., Boston, MA: November 27,

1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04499; Rexam Medial

Packaging, Mt. Holly, NJ: December

16, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04458; Leach

International, Buena Park, CA:

January 12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04515; Talon Automotive

Group, Production Stampong Div.,

Oxford, MI: January 12, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04545; Accuride Corp.,

Henderson, KY: February 7, 2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04421; HYD-Mech Group,

Ltd, HY-Mech Pueblo, Inc., Pueblo,

CO: January 3, 2000.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of February,

2001. Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20210 during normal business hours

or will be mailed to persons who write

to the above address.

Dated: February 21, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–5091 Filed 3–1–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–38,253]

Intercontinental Branded Apparel,

Ellwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York;

Notice of Revised Determination on

Reconsideration

By letter of February 5, 2001, the

company requested administrative

reconsideration of the Department’s

denial of eligibility to apply for trade

adjustment assistance applicable to

workers and former workers of the

subject firm.

The initial investigation resulted in a

negative determination issued on

December 18, 2000, and was published

in the Federal Register on January 11,

2001 (66 FR 2450). The investigation

findings showed that employment did

not decrease during the relevant time

period.

New information provided by the

company show that employment of

production workers decreased in

January through November 2000,

compared to January through November

1999.

At Intercontinental Branded Apparel,

Ellwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York,

production of coats declined in January

through November 2000, compared to

the same 1999 time period. During this

same time period, company imports of

men’s suit coats increased.

Conclusion

After careful review of the additional

facts obtained on reconsideration, I

conclude that increased imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

men’s suit coats contributed importantly

to the declines in sales or production

and to the total or partial separation of

workers of Intercontinental Branded

Apparel, Ellwood Avenue, Buffalo, New

York. In accordance with the provisions

of the Act, I make the following

certification:

All workers of Intercontinental Branded

Apparel, Ellwood Avenue, Buffalo, New

York, who became totally or partially

separated from employment on or after

October 17, 1999, through two years from the

date of this certification are eligible to apply

for adjustment assistance under Section 223

of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 21st day of

February, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade

Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–5089 Filed 3–1–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M