alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alejandro HERNANDEZ-SALAS, a/k/a Adolfo Perez, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-4460.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 28, 2007.

Decided: March 15, 2007.

William L. Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alejandro Hernandez-Salas entered a guilty plea, pursuant to a plea agreement, to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine base, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (2000). He received a sentence of thirty-seven months’ imprisonment. *298Hernandez-Salas’ counsel has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. Califor*nia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he has concluded there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but addressing the voluntariness of Hernandez-Salas’ guilty plea and propriety of his sentence. Hernandez-Salas was notified of his right to file a pro se informal brief; however, he did not file such a brief. In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal.

Therefore, we affirm Hernandez-Salas’ conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Hernandez-Salas, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Hernandez-Salas requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Hernandez-Salas. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-50]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Wild and Scenic River System: Ohio; Big and Little Darby 
Creeks

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Register notice dated Tuesday, November 21, 2000, 
page 69959, was submitted prematurely. This notice is hereby cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angie Tornes, Rivers, Trails and 
Conservation Assistance Program, National Park Service, Midwest Field 
Office, 310 West Wisconsin Street, Suite 100E, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 
53202; or telephone 414-297-3605.

    Dated: December 19, 2000.
David N. Given,
Deputy Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 01-50 Filed 1-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-233-000]


Questar Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

February 26, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 21, 2001, Questar Pipeline Company 
(Questar) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the tariff sheets as listed on Appendix A to 
the filing, to be effective March 23, 2001.
    Due to a change in Questar's management personnel, changes were 
proposed to modify the reference to the person by whom Questar's tariff 
has been issued. In addition, miscellaneous tariff ``clean-up'' 
revisions were made.
    Questar states that a copy of this filing has been served upon its 
customers, the Public Service Commission of Utah, and the Public 
Service Commission of Wyoming.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5100 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2559

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 16 (legislative date, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 601 East 12th

Street in Kansas City, Missouri, as the ‘‘Richard Bolling

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 601 East 12th Street

5 in Kansas City, Missouri, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Richard Bolling Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 2559 RFS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Richard Bolling Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 15,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
**Exhibit 21.1**SUBSIDIARIES OF HOLLYWOOD MEDIA CORP.   NAME OF SUBSIDIARY JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION   Baseline Acquisitions Corp. Delaware   Baseline, Inc. Delaware   Big Online, Inc. Florida   Broadway.com, Inc. Delaware   Cinemasonline Limited UK   Cinemasource UK Limited UK   Fedora, Inc. Iowa   Hollywood.com, Inc. California   Hollywood.com International, Inc. Delaware   Hollywood Fan Sites, Inc. Delaware   Hollywood.fr SARL France   Hollywood Services, Inc. Delaware   Hollywood Wrestling Venture LLC Delaware   Independent Hollywood, Inc. Delaware
 

 
   NetCo Partners (1) Florida   Showtimes.com, Inc. Delaware   Studio Systems Inc. Delaware   Spring Leisure Limited UK   Tekno Books (2) Florida   Tekno Books International, LLC Wisconsin   Tekno Comix, Inc. Florida   Theatre.com UK Limited UK   Theatre Direct NY, Inc. Delaware   Totally Hollywood TV, LLC Delaware   UK Theatres Online Limited UK   www.Co.UK Limited UK______________________     (1) NetCo Partners is a general partnership, formed under the laws of the State of Florida,in which Hollywood Media has a 50% partnership interest.     (2) Tekno Books is a general partnership, formed under the laws of the State of Florida, inwhich Hollywood Media has a 51% partnership interest.
EX-35.1
(logo) OCWEN



ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 7, 2008


RE: ACE 2007-WM2


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.


1. A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period, and
   of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
   March 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
   its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
   Reporting Period.



By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name: Ronald M. Faris
Title: President



Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 482

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION II

No. CV-15-209

DENNIS SCHLUTERMAN

APPELLANT

V.

BECKO MACHINE WORKS and

AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered September 16, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

COMMISSION [NO. G010248]

AFFIRMED

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge

Appellant Dennis Schluterman appeals an Arkansas Workers’ Compensation

Commission (Commission) decision determining that his left-hand condition was not a

compensable consequence of his admittedly compensable right-hand injury. Schluterman

contends that there was insufficient evidence to support this determination.

The Commission’s decision adequately summarizes Schluterman’s testimony, the

previous workers’ compensation claim with respect to Schluterman’s right hand, and the

relevant medical records. Further, the Commission exercised its duty to make determinations

of credibility, weigh the evidence, and resolve any conflicts in the testimony and evidence. 

Ark. Methodist Med. Ctr. v. Blansett, 2013 Ark. App. 480. Because the only issue on appeal

is the sufficiency of the evidence and because the opinion of the Commission thoroughly
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 482

explains its decision, we affirm by memorandum opinion pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of

In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985).

Affirmed.

GLADWIN, C.J., and HOOFMAN, J., agree.

Medlock, Gramlich & Sexton, LLP, by: Michael Ellig, for appellant.

Friday, Eldredge & Clark, LLP, by: Guy Alton Wade and Phillip M. Brick, Jr., for

appellees.

2
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 SECTION
        1350 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
        office of Rim Semiconductor Company (the "Company"), do hereby certify that
        to
        such officer's knowledge:
 
 (1) The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the period ended April
        30,
        2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 This
        certification is made solely for the purposes of U.S.C. Section 1350, and
        not
        for any other purpose.
 
 July
        10,
        2006
   /S/ BRAD
                KETCHBRAD
                  KETCH
                CHIEF
                  EXECUTIVE OFFICER (AND PRINCIPALFINANCIAL
                  AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                                   5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                     Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                      Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                                              2,475,345
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       1,287,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          131,029
<INVENTORY>                                                         1,246,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    6,651,002
<PP&E>                                                              2,677,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        799,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     62,482,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              11,468,881
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                              151,432
<OTHER-SE>                                                         49,347,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       62,482,825
<SALES>                                                            10,106,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   10,106,111
<CGS>                                                               3,572,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      31,444,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    563,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (24,657,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (24,657,024)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (24,657,024)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             (2.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (2.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard A. Baron, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of eResearchTechnology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
1

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 6, 2007 /s/ Richard A. Baron     Richard A Baron,
#### BARTEX RESEARCH, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDEX CORPORATION, FedEx Express Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., and FedEx Kinko’s Office and Print Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellees.

No. 2010-1397.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2011.

Richard B. Megley, Jr., Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Raymond P. Niro, David J. Sheikh, and Kara L. Szpondowski. Of counsel was Anna B. Folgers.

Doris Johnson Hines, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief were Christopher T. Blackford, John S. Sieman, and Jason W. Melvin; and Jeffrey A. Berkowitz, of Resten, VA. Of counsel on the brief was E. Chris Cherry, FedEx Corporation, of Memphis, TN.

*331Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of YCC Holdings LLC



|                                       |  |              
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|Yankee Holding Corp.                   |  | Delaware     
|The Yankee Candle Company, Inc.        |  | Massachusetts
|Yankee Candle Restaurant Corp.         |  | Delaware     
|Quality Gift Distributors, Inc.        |  | Delaware     
|Yankee Candle Admin, LLC               |  | Virginia     
|Yankee Candle Company (Europe) Limited |  | England      
|Yankee Candle Deutschland GmbH         |  | Germany
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-06-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-06-1997
<CASH>                                      11,586,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,070,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,979,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,937,305
<PP&E>                                       1,430,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                 658,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,736,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,661,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,684
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,998,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,736,736
<SALES>                                      5,117,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,117,168
<CGS>                                        3,234,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,234,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               397,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             420,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (697,926)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (697,926)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (697,926)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway Certifications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: April 3, 2009/s/ Lawrence Williams, Jr.Name:Lawrence Williams, Jr.Title:Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Richard A. CAPELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. Lee CARTER, III; South Carolina Department of Public Safety; York County Sheriffs Department; TFC DW Jenkins; York County Deputy Al-dridge, Defendants-Appellees, and Trooper SCDPS; Deputy York County, Defendants.

No. 14-1168.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

*200Richard A. Capell, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Matthews, Richardson, Plowden & Robinson, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Capell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint raising claims under Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2006), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Capell v. Carter,*No. 3:13-cv-00586-TLW, 2014 WL 197756 (D.S.C. Jan. 16, 2014). We deny Capell’s requests for video evidence, for appointment of counsel, to seal his case, for waiver of fees, and to serve documents electronically. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*