alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Martin W. Trofimuk, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of North
Bancshares, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly represent in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the small business
issuer and have;

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors;

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: March 25, 2004
      --------------

                /s/ Martin W. Trofimuk
                ----------------------
                Martin W. Trofimuk, Vice President, Treasurer and
                Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2009 of Crystallex International Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2010
relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting which appears in the Exhibit
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report of our Comments by Auditors
on Canada  US Reporting Difference dated March 31, 2010 which appears in the
Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.

We also consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-126128) (the
"Registration Statements") of Crystallex International Corporation of our report
and comments referred to above. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Interests of Experts" in the Annual Information Form incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F which is incorporated by reference
in such Registration Statements.

|                | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP                        
|--------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Toronto, Canada |                                                       
|March 31, 2010  | Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public
    Accountants



---
EXHIBIT 10.20
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
MASTER SUPPLY AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
 Amendment Client Octopus GTA Agreement
    ARTICLE I
AMENDMENTS
 Section 1.1
 Section 1.2
 ARTICLE II
MISCELLANEOUS
 Section 2.1
 Section 2.2
 Section 2.3
 Section 2.4
 Section 2.5




---



##### 



Section 2.6




---



##### 



ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, INC./s/ Mike NelsonName:
    Mike NelsonTitle:
    President, Partner ServicesOCTOPUS TRAVEL GROUP LIMITED/s/ Kurt EkertName:
    Kurt EkertTitle:
    DirectorDONVAND LIMITED/s/ Kurt EkertName:
    Kurt EkertTitle:
    Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1352-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Alabama, (FEMA-1352-DR), dated December 18, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 28, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of December 18, 2000: 

Cherokee and Jefferson Counties for Individual Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-477 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Document

EXHIBIT 10.5

March 30, 2020


Via Email (bgrass@helenoftrov.com)
Brian L. Grass
1 Helen of Troy Plaza 
El Paso, Texas 79912


RE:      June 17, 2019 Severance Agreement


Brian:


We write to request a limited waiver to the rights provided to you in Section 5.9(b) of your June 17, 2019 Severance Agreement with Helen of Troy Nevada Corporation (the "Agreement"). Pursuant to Section 5.9(b) of the Agreement, you are entitled to terminate your employment with Helen of Troy Nevada Corporation (the "Company") for Good Reason (as defined in the Agreement) in the event of "a material reduction by the Company in [your) base salary." Given the unprecedented impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Company is requesting that you accept a twenty-percent reduction to your current base salary beginning April 1, 2020 and continuing until further notice by the Company, but in no case shall such reduction continue past February 28, 2021. For the duration of the twenty­ percent reduction in your base salary, with the exception of the reference to "unpaid base salary" in Section 3.4 the Agreement, all references to base pay or base salary in the Agreement shall refer to the full base salary in effect immediately prior to April 1, 2020. Except as set forth above, all of the other terms, provisions and conditions of the Agreement will remain and continue in effect.


If this temporary reduction is acceptable to you, please sign in the space provided below and return to me. This letter may be signed in any number of separate counterparts, each of which shall collectively and separately constitute  one  agreement.  Please  note,  by  signing  this  letter,  you  are  waiving  any  rights  to  terminate   your employment for Good Reason under Section 5.9 of the Agreement on the basis of this reduction.


Sincerely,






/s/ Tessa Judge
Tessa Judge
SVP - General Counsel


/s/ Brian L. Grass
Brian L. Grass


HelenofTroy.com
2009-1679.

#### Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. James.

Warren App. No. CA2009-04-038. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due September 28, 2009, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
----

9

7(a)
7(a)

----

7(c)

----

7(a)
7(d)
7(b)
7(c)
4
(c)
7(a)

----

7
(a)

4(e)

----

7
7

----

----

----

----

10
10

7(a)
11

----

10(e)

----

10

----

7

----

7(f)
10

----

----

|   | PACIFIC OFFICE MANAGEMENT, INC. |                        |
|--------|---------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |                            |                        |   |
|   | By:                             | /s/ Kimberly F. Aquino |   |
|   |                            | Kimberly F. Aquino          |   |
|   |                            | Secretary                   |   |
|   |                            |                        |   |

|   | PACIFIC OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. |                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|   |                                  |                    |   |
|   | By:                                   | /s/ Jay H. Shidler |   |
|   |                                  | Jay H. Shidler          |   |
|   |                                  | Chairman of the Board   |   |
|   |                                  |                    |   |

|   | PACIFIC OFFICE PROPERTIES, L.P. |                                                                                                    |
|--------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                            |  By:  PACIFIC OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.,    its general partner  |   |
|   |                            | By: /s/ Jay H. Shidler                                                                             |   |
|   |                            | Jay H. Shidler                                                                                          |   |
|   |                            | Chairman of the Board                                                                                   |   |
|   |                            |                                                                                                    |   |

|   | EXECUTIVE                     |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |                          |   |
|   | /s/ James R. Ingebritsen |   |
|   | James R. Ingebritsen          |   |
|   |                          |   |
|   |                          |   |

----

----

----

----

|   | [_______________________] |        |
|--------|---------------------------|-------------|
|   |                      |        |   |
| Date   | By:                       |        |   |
|   |                      | Name   |   |
|   |                      | Title  |   |
|   |                      |        |   |

|   | EXECUTIVE |                 |
|--------|-----------|----------------------|
|   |      |                 |   |
| Date   | By:       |                 |   |
|   |      | James R. Ingebritsen |   |
|   |      |                 |   |
|   |      |                 |   |

----
#### Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Shimko.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Shimko,*124 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2009-Ohio-6879.]

*1202(No. 2009-1957

Submitted December 8, 2009

Decided December 15, 2009.)

{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F).

{¶ 2} On October 26, 2009, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered June 23, 2009, in *In the Matter of Timothy A. Shimko,*in case No. SB-09-0061-D, publicly censuring respondent. On November 3, 2009, this court ordered respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed in this state. Respondent filed a response to the show cause order. This cause was considered by the court and on consideration thereof,

{¶ 3} It is ordered and adjudged by this court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), respondent, Timothy Andrew Shimko, Attorney Registration No. 0006736, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio, be publicly reprimanded.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order and all other orders in this case by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Office of Attorney Services.

{¶ 7} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 10Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,060,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               34,293,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,738,021
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,242,530
<PP&E>                                      48,655,035
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,757,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             500,644,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,409,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,503,963
<OTHER-SE>                                 138,198,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               500,694,059
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,877,965
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (28,452,197)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (10,345,898)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (2,930,372)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (15,795,433)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,664,894)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,664,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (598,225)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,263,119)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-486, MM Docket No. 00-188, RM-9969]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; New Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of WWL-TV, Inc., licensee of 
station WWL-TV, substitutes DTV channel 36 for DTV channel 30 at New 
Orleans, Louisiana. See 65 FR 60163, October 10, 2000. DTV channel 36 
can be allotted to New Orleans in compliance with the principle 
community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference 
coordinates (29-54-23 N. and 90-02-23 W.) with a power of 1000, HAAT of 
305 meters and with a DTV service population of 1712 thousand.

DATES: Effective April 12, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-188, adopted February 23, 2001, and 
released February 26, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.
    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336.


Sec. 73.622   [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Louisiana, is amended by removing DTV channel 30 and adding DTV 
channel 36 at New Orleans.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-4913 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Student Handout- Module Number Twenty-Four (24) - Electronic Records and 

Signatures 

Electronic Records and Signatures 

Electronic records and signatures are considered the legal equivalents of paper records and 

handwritten signatures executed on paper. 

A predicate rule is any regulation or law that includes a requirement to keep a record. 

Look to predicate rule for: 

- what records to keep 

- how long to maintain records 

- what signatures are required 

An electronic record is any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other 

information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, 

retrieved, or distributed by a computer system. 

An electronic signature is a computer data compilation of any symbol or series of symbols 

executed, adopted, or authorized by an individual to be the legally binding equivalent of the 

individual's handwritten signature. 

System Requirements: 

- Validation 

- Qualification: 

- Installation qualification 

- Operational qualification 

- Performance qualification—test 

Electronic signature mechanisms may be based on: 

- biometrics such as scan of retina (eye), face, fingerprint, or voice recognition 

- two distinct components such as identification code or card and password 

Closed system means an environment in which system access is controlled by persons who 

are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system. 

Open system means an environment in which system access is not controlled by persons who 

are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system. 

Page 1