alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 00-44, FCC 00-343]


Extension of the Filing Requirement for Children's Television 
Programming Reports (FCC Form 398)

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission revised the children's educational television 
reporting requirements of commercial broadcast television licensees, 
which involved a number of revisions to FCC Form 398, the Children's 
Television Programming Report. Certain of these rule and form revisions 
contained new and modified information collection requirements and were 
published in the Federal Register on November 9, 2000. This document 
announces the effective date of the revised rules and form.

DATES: The revisions to Sec. 73.3526(e)(11)(iii), published at 65 FR 
67283 (November 9, 2000), became effective on January 1, 2001. The 
revised Form 398 will be used for the quarterly Children's Television 
Programming Reports due to be filed by April 10, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Matthews, Mass Media Bureau, 
Policy and Rules Division, (202) 418-2130.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 15, 2000, the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approved the information collection 
requirements contained in the revised 47 CFR 73.3526(e)(11)(iii) and 
FCC Form 398 pursuant to OMB Control Nos. 3060-0754. Accordingly, the 
information collection requirements contained in this rule became 
effective on January 1, 2001, and the revised form will be used for the 
quarterly Children's Television Programming Report due to be filed by 
April 10, 2001.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4424 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2475

To provide for congressional approval of a nuclear aircraft carrier waste

disposal plan before the construction of CVN–76, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1993

Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr.

TOWNS, Mr. WAXMAN, and Mr. OWENS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide for congressional approval of a nuclear aircraft

carrier waste disposal plan before the construction of

CVN–76, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NUCLEAR CARRIER WASTE DISPOSAL PLAN.

4 (a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Within one year of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit

6 to Congress a 20-year plan for the safe life-cycle mainte7 nance and decommissioning of the Navy’s nuclear-powered

8 aircraft carriers. The plan shall provide for—
2

•HR 2475 IH

1 (1) sites and methods for safe disposal of spent

2 nuclear fuel; and

3 (2) sites and methods for the safe disposal of

4 the ships’ hulls, structures, machinery, and equip5 ment.

6 (b) CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.—Notwithstanding

7 any other provision of law, no funds may be appropriated

8 for the construction of the next nuclear-powered aircraft

9 carrier (CVN–76) until the plan set forth in the report

10 required by subsection (a) (or an alternative plan meeting

11 the same requirements as set forth in subsection (a)) has

12 been approved by law.

13 SEC. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY OF NUCLEAR AIR14 CRAFT CARRIER ACCIDENTS.

15 Within one year of the enactment of this Act, the Sec16 retary of Energy shall submit to Congress a report detail17 ing the likelihood and environmental impact of a reactor

18 accident aboard a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, includ19 ing—

20 (1) a noncombat accident or systems failure;

21 and

22 (2) a combat-related accident or systems fail23 ure.
3

•HR 2475 IH

1 SEC. 3. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS.

2 (a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Within one year of the en3 actment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United

4 States shall submit to Congress a report detailing the

5 costs and benefits of the construction of another nuclear6 powered aircraft carrier (CVN–76). The report shall in7 clude—

8 (1) detailed estimates of the cost of construct9 ing and operating CVN–76;

10 (2) the operational benefits of a nuclear-pow11 ered aircraft carrier in comparison to a convention12 ally powered aircraft carrier;

13 (3) the operational limitations of nuclear-pow14 ered aircraft carriers that have been put into place

15 by foreign nations and international law;

16 (4) the feasibility and budget impact of fulfill17 ing the Navy’s strategic commitments through the

18 construction of a conventionally powered aircraft

19 carrier; and

20 (5) the feasibility and budget impact of fulfill21 ing the Navy’s strategic commitments through the

22 performance of a Service Life Extension Program on

23 the U.S.S. America (CV–66).

Æ
#### Bernardo Martinez RAMOS; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72279.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 23, 2007.

Celeste S. Castro, Esq., Law Offices of Celeste S. Castro, Santa Ana, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, William C. Minick, Esq., Kelly J. Walls, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bernardo Martinez Ramos and Maria De Lourdes Ramos Hernandez, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying their ap*616plication for cancellation of removal based on their failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their two United States citizen children.

Petitioners contend that the BIA violated their due process rights by failing to cumulatively weigh the hardship factors that their United States citizen children would experience upon petitioners removal.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. *See MartinezRosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

Although we retain jurisdiction to consider colorable constitutional claims that petitioners may raise, *Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 1001, 1004 (9th Cir.2003), petitioners’ contention that the BIA and IJ deprived them of due process by misapplying the law to the facts of this case by not cumulatively weighing the evidence of hardship is not a colorable due process claim. *See Martinez-Rosas,*424 F.3d at 930 (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”)

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*February 1, 2010*

[Cite as *02/01/2010 Case Announcements #2,*2010-Ohio-335.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2001-0524.

#### State v. Brown.

Mahoning App. No. 96 C.A. 56. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution and supplemental motion for stay of execution scheduled for February 4, 2010. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motions for stay of execution are denied.
:::-=::::-::::: United States Department of Agriculture 

Japan - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Meat to the United States 

December 27, 2023 

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*) 

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted 

G1 Gunma-ken Shokuniku Oroshiuri Shijo Co., Ltd. 02/21/2002 

GI1 Hida Meat Center/Hida Meat Agricultural Cooperatives 01/12/2016 

HMJ-1 Wagyu Master Meat Center 05/24/2019 

HOK-1 Hokkaido Livestock Corp., Co., Ltd., Tokachi Factory, Tokachi General Meat 

Distribution Center (Third plant) 

05/31/2019 

I1 Iwachiku Co., Ltd. 08/23/2012 

K1 Nanchiku Co., Ltd. 02/21/2002 

K2 Sankyo Meat Ltd., Ariake Meat Plant 12/26/2002 

K3 Akune Meat Distribution Center Co., Ltd./Starzen Meat Processor Co., Ltd., 

Akune Plant 01/24/2011 

K4 JA Shokuniku Kagoshima Co., Ltd., Nansatu Plant 08/23/2012 

KU2 Kumamoto Chikusan Ryutsu Center Co., Ltd. 03/06/2014 

KY-1 Kyoto City Slaughterhouse/Kyoto Meat Market Co., Ltd. 01/31/2020 

M1 Miyachiku Corp., Ltd., Takasaki Plant 02/21/2002 

M5 Miyachiku Corp., Ltd., Tsuno Plant 05/17/2019 

OI-1 Oitaken Chikusankosya Co., Ltd. 04/05/2019 

* SAG-1 General Incorporated Association Saga Prefecture Livestock Corporation 12/26/2023 

TOC-1 Tochigi Meat Center 06/17/2020 

* Addition of New Establishment
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mine Clearing Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Olson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Larry Olson Larry Olson 
Principal Executive Officer 
December 14, 2010   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mine Clearing Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Olson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Larry Olson Larry Olson
Principal Financial Officer 
December 14, 2010
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

 FIFTH DISTRICT 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JERMAINE JEROD DANZY, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-248

LT Case No. 16-2021-CF-001495

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed May 16, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

London M. Kite, Judge. 

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, 

and Ross S. Haine, II, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for 

Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

JAY, SOUD and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
#### Rumi J. SANDLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES *of*America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-40355

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 18, 2011.

Rumi Sandlin, Richardson, TX, pro se.

Thomas Edward Gibson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendantr-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that pro se appellant’s motion requesting that attorney *841Thomas Gibson be ordered and warned by a temporary restraining order or injunction is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se appellant’s motions to disqualify attorney Thomas Gibson is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se appellant’s motion requesting that portions noted in his motion as speculative or as testifying to fact and not evidence be stricken is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se appellant’s motion for temporary restraining order and injunctive relief is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se appellant’s motion to file out of time a reply to appellee’s response to the motion to disqualify is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court dismissing the appeal is AFFIRMED. Mandate to issue forthwith.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.1
 RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principals;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financing reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involved management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.By:
    /s/ T. Michael AnsleyT. Michael AnsleyChairman of the Board, President and ChiefExecutive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Docket No. 33-99] 

Notice is hereby given that the application by the Lincoln Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 59, requesting an expansion of the scope of manufacturing authority to include new manufacturing capacity under FTZ procedures and requesting authority to expand the boundary of FTZ 59A at the Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A. (KMM), plant in Lincoln, Nebraska (64 FR 37496, 7-12-99), has been amended to include an additional 732,000 square feet of production area to the previously-announced expansion. The additional square footage would result in a new configuration for Subzone 59A of 2.9 million square feet on 332 acres, with a revised subzone boundary. 

The application remains otherwise unchanged. 

The comment period is reopened until March 26, 2001. 

Dated: February 21, 2001. 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary 

[FR Doc. 01-4776 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2748 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2748

 To amend the Small Business Development Center Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1993

  Mr. LaFalce introduced the following bill which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Development Center Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 21(c)(7) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) is 
amended by striking ``system which will'' and by inserting in lieu 
thereof the following: ``system. Subject to amounts approved in advance 
in appropriations acts, the Administration may make grants or enter 
cooperative agreements with one or more centers to carry out the 
provisions of this paragraph. The matching funds provisions of 
subsection (a) shall not be applicable to grants to cooperative 
agreements under this paragraph. The system shall''.
    (b) Section 25(i) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 652) is 
amended by striking ``$8,000,000 for fiscal year 1993'' and by 
inserting in lieu thereof ``$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1993, 
1994, 1995, and 1996''.
    (c) Section 223 of the Small Business Credit and Business 
Opportunity Enhancement Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 986) is amended by 
striking the last sentence of subsection (b).

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.57 


 


AMENDMENT
TO


NOTE
AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT TO NOTE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into among Edison Nation, Inc. (“Edison Nation”),
and Paul J. Solit and Julie B. Solit the undersigned parties and/or their nominees (“Lender” or “Payee”):


 


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into that certain Note Agreement (“Agreement”) dated as of January 15, 2020;


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section A.9 of the Agreement, the maturity date of the Agreement means July 15, 2020 and the parties hereto
desire to extend the maturity date to December 15, 2020;


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section A.3 of the Agreement, the Company will work to remove the restriction on the original issuance of 13,000
shares of restricted common shares of Edison Nation pursuant to SEC Rule 144;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE,
for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following terms of the Amendment.


 


1.
Section A.2 to the Agreement is replaced with the following:


 


OID:
$14,000


 


2.
Section A.3 to the Agreement is replaced with the following:


 


Incentive
Shares: 13,000 shares of restricted common shares of stock of Edison Nation pursuant to SEC Rule 144.


 


Additional
Incentive Shares: 13,000 shares of restricted common shares of stock of Edison Nation pursuant to SEC Rule 144.


 


3.
Section A.9 to the Agreement is replaced with the following:


 


Maturity
Date means December 15, 2020.


 


[SIGNATURE
PAGES TO FOLLOW]


 




    	 	 	 



     


    

 


WHEREFORE
each of the parties has accepted and agreed by affixing their respective authorized
signatures below as of the date first above written.


 


	EDISON NATION, INC. 	 
	 	 
		 
	By: Christopher B. Ferguson, CEO 	 
	 	 
	PAUL J. SOLIT AND JULIE B. SOLIT	 
	 	 
		 
	By: Paul J. Solit 	 
	 	 
		 
	By: Julie B. Solit
Exhibit 102 2014 Options



		

			EXHIBIT 10.2

		


		

			 

		




		
			MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.
		

		
			2005 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT TO
		

		
			NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (the "Company"), having an address at 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747, and FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME (the "Grantee"), having an address at  ADDRESS_LINE_1 , CITY, STATE ZIPCODE, hereby amend that certain Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement by and between the Company and the Grantee dated October 22, 2014 (the “Option Agreement”).
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend the expiration date of the Option Agreement.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that the Option Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			1.The first sentence of Section 4, entitled “Term and Exercisability of the Option Period.” shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			The Option shall expire on October 21, 2022, and, except as otherwise provided herein, may be exercised prior to its expiration at such times and for such number of whole Shares as follows:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			2.All terms and conditions of the Option Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect and shall constitute the legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligations of Participant and the Company.  As of the date hereof, each party herein restates, ratifies and reaffirms each and every term and condition set forth in the Option Agreement, as amended herein.  There are no other changes to the Option Agreement except for the changes specifically set forth herein.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			[Signature Page Follows]
		

		
			﻿
		

		

		

		 


		

			1

		




 


		

			 

		




		
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the date set forth below:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			
		

		
			
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			By: _______________________________________
		

		
			       
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Date: ________________________ , 2020
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Grantee
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			_______________________________________
		

		
			(FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME)
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Date: ________________________ , 2020
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		 


		

			2