alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jeffrey K. ROBLES, Petitioner v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 09-1293.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 30, 2010.

Jeffrey K. Robles, Kingston, MA, pro se.

John Wallace Avery, Senior Litigation Counsel, Dominick V. Freda, Senior Counsel, David M. Becker, Esquire, General Counsel, Dimple Gupta, Jacob H. Stillman, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*338BEFORE: HENDERSON, GARLAND, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This petition for review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission was considered on the briefs and appendices filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. The Commission’s order imposing remedial sanctions on petitioner was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law. *See Dearlove v. SEC,*573 F.3d 801, 804 (D.C.Cir.2009), *citing*5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), and *Nat’l Rural Elec. Coop. Ass’n v. SEC,*276 F.3d 609, 614 (D.C.Cir. 2002). Moreover, the Commission’s factual findings were well-supported by substantial evidence. *See Dearlove,*573 F.3d at 804, *citing*15 U.S.C. § 78y(a)(4), and *Steadman v. SEC,*450 U.S. 91, 96 n. 12, 101 S.Ct. 999, 67 L.Ed.2d 69 (1981).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          22,036
<SECURITIES>                                    29,026
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,300
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,538
<PP&E>                                          37,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,695
<BONDS>                                             63
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           336
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,035
<SALES>                                         84,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,091
<CGS>                                            6,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (300)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,027
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (33,799)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (77,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.59)


</TABLE>
SECOND AMENDMENT TO

CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

The Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, asamended and restated effective March 1, 1999, as heretofore amended (the"Plan"), is hereby amended as follows effective immediately prior to theeffective time of the consummation of the merger of CTG Resources, Inc. with andinto Oak Merger Co. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as ofJune 29,1999, by and among CTG Resources, Inc., Energy East Corporation and OakMerger Co.:

1.	By deleting Section 8.1 of the Plan and inserting in lieu thereof thefollowing:

"8.1	Amendment and Termination.  

(a) Prior to Change of Control.  Prior to the occurrence of a Changeof Control and, except as provided in Section 8.1(b), on and after theoccurrence of a Change of Control, the Board of Directors of CNG may modify oramend, in whole or in part, any or all of the provisions of the Plan, or suspendor terminate it entirely, at any time.  In no event may any member of the Boardof Directors of CNG who is eligible to participate or who is participating inthis Plan participate in any action described in the preceding sentence.  If thePlan is terminated, the Account balances of all Participants, valued as of thedate of termination, shall be paid to them as soon as practicable in a lumpsum.

(b)	After a Change of Control.  On or after the effective date of aChange of Control, this Plan may not be modified or amended in any manner whichis adverse to any person who was a Participant on June 29, 1999 (or Beneficiaryor Beneficiaries thereof entitled to receive benefits under the Plan) unless thesigned written consent to such amendment is obtained from such Participant (orsuch Beneficiary or Beneficiaries).  From and after the occurrence of a Changeof Control, the Plan may not be terminated without the consent of all personswho were Participants in the Plan as of June 29, 1999 and who continue to haveAccount balances under the Plan (and Beneficiaries thereof entitled to receivebenefits under the Plan).  If the Plan is so terminated, the Account balances ofall Participants, valued as of the date of termination, shall be paid to them assoon as practicable in a lump sum.  In no event may any member of the Board ofDirectors of CNG who is eligible to participate or who is participating in thisPlan participate in any action describe in this Section 8.1 on behalf ofCNG.

2.	Except as hereinabove modified and amended, the amended and restatedPlan (as amended) shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation executes thisSecond Amendment this 14th day of December, 1999.

ATTEST:					CONNECTICUT NATURAL GAS CORPORATION

 

By Jean S.McCarthy                                          
Its Vice President, HumanResources
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4072]



[[Page 10878]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-741-000]


American Electric Power Service Corporation; Notice of Filing

February 13, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 16, 2001, American Electric Power 
Service Corporation tendered for filing with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission), an amendment to its original filing 
that was filed with the Commission on December 21, 2000 in the above-
referenced proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before February 23, 2001. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4072 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# PLACE:

4th Floor, Conference Room 4506, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Approval of the minutes of the February 12, 2001, Board member meeting.

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Date: February 27, 2001.

Elizabeth S. Woodruff,

Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 01-5302  Filed 2-28-01; 4:28 pm]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boulder Capital Opportunities II,
Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended herein as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Michael J. Delaney,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          or the Company.

Date:  November 21, 2005
                                                        /s/  Michael J. Delaney
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                       
                                       
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                       
                                       
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports, included in this Form 10-K, into Simon DeBartolo Group, Inc.'s
(formerly Simon Property Group, Inc.) previously filed Registration Statement
File Nos. 33-79884, 33-87764, 33-87766, 333-06933, 333-43235, 333-33627 and 333-
43681.




                                   /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana,
March 19, 1998
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2857 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2018 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To designate the Nordic Museum in Seattle, Washington, 

as the ‘‘National Nordic Museum’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2857 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Nordic Mu3 seum Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds that— 

6 (1) the Nordic Museum in Seattle, Washington, 

7 is the only museum in the United States dedicated 

8 to Nordic history, culture, and art; 

9 (2) Nordic people have long contributed to the 

10 rich cultural heritage of the United States; 

11 (3) the Nordic Museum serves as a unique and 

12 valuable resource locally and nationally for expand13 ing knowledge relating to— 

14 (A) Nordic heritage; and 

15 (B) the impact Nordic heritage has had 

16 throughout the United States; 

17 (4) a new state-of-the-art facility was opened to 

18 house the Nordic Museum on May 5, 2018, making 

19 Nordic history, culture, and art even more engaging 

20 and accessible to the public; 

21 (5) to provide funds and exhibits for the new 

22 Nordic Museum, numerous public and private enti23 ties and many private individuals partnered to24 gether, including— 

25 (A) the State of Washington; 

26 (B) King County, Washington; 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

S 2857 RFH

1 (C) the Nordic Council, which is composed 

2 of representatives from the national parliaments 

3 of Nordic countries; and 

4 (D) the national museums of Denmark, 

5 Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden; 

6 (6) the Nordic Museum is— 

7 (A) a significant resource for preserving 

8 and celebrating the history, culture, and art of 

9 Nordic immigrants in the United States; and 

10 (B) the only museum in the United States 

11 that exists for the exclusive purpose of pre12 serving, interpreting, and providing education 

13 about Nordic culture and heritage; and 

14 (7) the Nordic Museum promotes valuable 

15 international relations between the United States 

16 and the Nordic countries of Denmark, Finland, Ice17 land, Norway, and Sweden. 

18 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL NORDIC MUSEUM. 

19 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Nordic Museum located at 

20 2655 N.W. Market Street, Seattle, Washington, is des21 ignated as the ‘‘National Nordic Museum’’. 

22 (b) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.— 

23 (1) IN GENERAL.—The museum designated by 

24 subsection (a) is not a unit of the National Park 

25 System. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

S 2857 RFH

1 (2) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—The designation 

2 of the museum by subsection (a) shall not require 

3 Federal funds to be expended for any purpose re4 lated to the museum. 

Passed the Senate June 6, 2018. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Milton BOYSAW, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7549.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 21, 2011.

*768Donald Milton Boysaw, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Milton Boysaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boysaw has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Boysavris notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(h). Boysaw’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

*769We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2799 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2799

To suspend temporarily the duty on anthraquinone disulfonic acid sodium 
                                 salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 1993

  Mr. Shays introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on anthraquinone disulfonic acid sodium 
                                 salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
      

``  9902.31.11  Anthraquinone disulfonic                   No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                 acid sodium salt                                                             31/95           ''
                 (provided for in                                                                              .
                 subheading 2914.70.20).  Free                                                                  

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### William Jay DICAPRIO-CUOZZO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7566.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 21, 2011.

William Jay Dicaprio-Cuozzo, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Jay Dicaprio-Cuozzo seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently *766reviewed the record and conclude that Dicaprio-Cuozzo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT
      32.1





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Rim Semiconductor Company (the “Company”), does hereby certify that
      to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended April 30,
      2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





This
      certification is made solely for the purposes of U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
      for any other purpose.





June
      14,
      2006








/S/
      BRAD KETCH


BRAD
      KETCH


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER (AND PRINCIPAL


FINANCIAL
      AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)