alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1658-1659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-200-062]


Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

January 3, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 21, 2000, Reliant Energy Gas 
Transmission Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be 
effective January 1, 2001:

Second Revised Sheet No. 8K
Original Sheet No. 8K.01

    REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the 
addition of a new negotiated rate arrangement involving three 
contracts.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://
www.ferc.fed.us/online/

[[Page 1659]]

rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may 
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-520 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of DCM ENTERPRISES, INC (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the date  hereof  (the "Report"),  I,
Albert  Reda,  CEO  and  CFO,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. ss.  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

         (1)         The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

         (2)          The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and result of
operations  of  the  Company.


Date:  August  20,  2004.

/s/  Albert  Reda
---------------------------
Albert  Reda
CEO/CFO


                                       14
<PAGE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 2- 11 21 6 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 6 :1 0- cr-0 02 42 -CEH-KRS- 1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us TRACY COX, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Sep te m be r 24 , 20 12 ) Befo re MAR CUS, MARTIN an d F AY, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:

Case: 12-11216 Date Filed: 09/24/2012 Page: 1 of 2Ch arl es E. Tay lo r, ap po in te d c ou ns el forTracy Co x i n t hi s d ire ctcri m in al

ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an d fil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And er s v. C al if or ni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s t ha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andCo x’s co nv ic ti on an d s en te nc e are AFFIRMED .

2

Case: 12-11216 Date Filed: 09/24/2012 Page: 2 of 2
#### UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC., petitioner, v. Francisco J. ESPINOSA.

No. 08-1134.

June 15, 2009.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Buckhead Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18,
Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|Dated: November 13, 2008
|                        
|/s/ Dawn Kinard         
|Dawn Kinard             
|Chief Financial Officer
Student Handout- Module Number Sixteen (16) - Closures for Metal Containers 

Closures for Metal Containers 

Container Integrity - Primary Intent Of Part 9 CFR 431.2 

- To prevent product adulteration due to leakage during cooling and handling after 

retorting. 

Kinds of metal cans: 

Sanitary (Open Top) Can 

- 3-PIECE SOLDERED 

- 3-PIECE WELDED 

- 2 PIECE DRAWN 

- Half-Size Seam Table Tray 

Double Seam: 

- Formed by joining body of can with end 

- Body flange interlocked with end curl 

- Formed in two operations 

The most critical measurements to a can’s double seam are: 

- Overlap : The degree of interlock between the body hook and cover hook 

- Tightness: Degree of cover hook wrinkle after double seaming. Tightness rating 

indicates relative freedom from wrinkles. 

Juncture Area - Location where double seam crosses welded side seam 

Page 1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can Seam Defects: 

First Operation Too Loose

Loose First/Normal Second Operation

First Operation Too Tight

Tight First/Loose Second Operation

Short Cover Hook 

Long Cover Hook

Mushroomed Flange

Loose Second Operation Seam

Loose Seam 

“Vee”, Lip, or Spur

Sharp Seam

Cutover and Fracture 

Double Seam Skip

Misassembly

Cut Seam 

Swollen Can 

Corrosion 

Damaged Coating

Open Weld At Side Seam 

Visual Inspection Requirements 

Broken Chuck 

Excessively Tight Second Operation

Insufficient Overlap

Excessive Countersink Depth

Seam Bumps

False Seam 

Damaged Flange and End Curl

Knock Down Flange

Droop

Cocked Body

Cut Over 

Deadhead (Spinner)

Can Body Buckling

Jumped Seam Or “Jump-over”

Fractured Embossed Code 

Panelling

Internal Can Corrosion (Pinhole

 Development) 

Dents 

- For double-seam cans, each can should be examined for gross defects such as cutover

or sharpness, skidding (deadheading), false seam, droop at the crossover or lap, and 

condition of the inside of countersink wall for evidence of broken chuck. 

- Must record the observations made and any corrective action taken. 

- Additional visual closure inspections must be made immediately following a jam in a 

closing machine, after closing machine adjustment, or after start-up of a machine 

following a prolonged shutdown. 

- All pertinent observations must be recorded. 

- When irregularities are found, the corrective action must be recorded. 

Immediate Corrective Action Required When:

• Sharp cut-overs/fractures 

• Heavy cut-over at crossover 

• Severe droop at cross-over 

• VEES or LIPS 

• False seam 

• Distorted seam 

• Skidding or deadheading 

• Fractured code 

Page 2 
Should Perform Teardown Examinations: 

 At the beginning of production 

 Immediately after severe jam 

 After adjustment or changes to seaming machine 

Link to a reference guide for can defects: 

Microsoft Word - A Pocket Guide To Can Defects.doc (denvergov.org) 

COCE (usda.gov) 

Page 3
Additional USDA Administrative Leave Flexibility for COVID-19 Vaccinations 

The Department has authorized an additional administrative leave flexibility to further safeguard our 

employees and their families. 

Effective August 4, 2021, USDA employees shall be granted up to 4 hours of administrative leave per 

vaccination event or escort of family members to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. Employees who 

request administrative leave under the new flexibility are limited to the time spent traveling to and from 

as well as time spent at the vaccination location during their scheduled tour of duty (up to 4 hours). On a 

case-by-case basis, additional paid administrative leave may be granted for extenuating circumstances 

specific to travel and time spent receiving the vaccine. 

Family member is defined as an individual with any of the following relationships to the employee: 

1. Spouse and spouse’ parents. 

2. Children and children’s spouses. 

3. Parents and parent’s spouses. 

4. Siblings and sibling’s spouses. 

5. Grandparents and grandchildren, and their spouses. 

6. Domestic partner and partner’s parents, including domestic partners of any individual listed in 

1-5 above. 

7. Any individual related by blood or affinity whose close association with the employee is the 

equivalent of a family relationship. 

This new paid administrative leave flexibility is in addition to the 16 hours of paid administrative leave 

granted for employees to receive COVID-19 vaccinations and recovery time, if needed. There are no 

provisions to authorize paid administrative leave for periods outside of the employee’s scheduled tour 

of duty. Retroactive grant of paid administrative leave prior to August 4, 2021 to escort a family member 

is not authorized. Intermittent employees are not eligible for this flexibility since they do not earn leave. 

Employees are to use transaction code 66 Administrative Leave/Excused Absence on their timesheets 

for these absences. 

Please direct questions regarding this notice to the Office of Human Resources via email at 

FSISHR1@usda.gov or call 877-FSIS-HR1 (877-347-7471), option 4.
[No. 30336-1-II.

Division Two.

August 14, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Shawn D. Dunkelberger, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 02-1-01152-1, Christine A. Pomeroy, J., entered April 15, *2003.Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2821 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2821

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 
veterans who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll as radiation 
exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection 
 of certain disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2018

    Ms. Smith (for herself, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Merkley, Ms. 
  Baldwin, Mr. King, Ms. Warren, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
Brown, Mr. Tester, Mr. Coons, and Ms. Hirono) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 
veterans who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll as radiation 
exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection 
 of certain disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mark Takai Atomic Veterans 
Healthcare Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATED IN CLEANUP OF ENEWETAK 
              ATOLL AS RADIATION EXPOSED VETERANS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION OF CERTAIN DISABILITIES 
              BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 1112(c)(3)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new clause:
                    ``(v) Cleanup of Enewetak Atoll during the period 
                beginning on January 1, 1977, and ending on December 
                31, 1980.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect on the day after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          97,031
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,482
<PP&E>                                          16,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,118
<SALES>                                         41,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,812
<CGS>                                           23,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (140)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,355
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,836
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,836
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gregory S. Metz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gregory S. Metz    
|Gregory S. Metz        
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|November 4, 2004       



This certification is made solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



52
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig W. Rydin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ CRAIG W. RYDIN     
|Craig W. Rydin         
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 20, 2008
Revised Abatement Order filed January 8, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00395-CR

____________

ALEXI DOMINICK HEMPHILL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1327402

REVISED ABATEMENT ORDER

On September 30, 2014, this court directed the trial court to conduct a 

hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial regarding his contention that he was 

denied effective assistance of counsel at the punishment phase of trial because of 

counsel’s failure to investigate, interview, and call witnesses to provide mitigating 

evidence. The order abated this appeal for 60 days, required the trial judge to see 

that a record of the hearing is made, and order the court reporter and the trial clerk 

to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the 
trial court’s signed order ruling on the motion for new trial. The order required 

those records to be filed on or before October 30, 2014.

No records were filed, and upon inquiry, this court was informed that a 

hearing was scheduled for November 20, 2014. When no records were filed within 

30 days of the scheduled hearing, this court inquired further, and was informed that 

the hearing was continued to January 9, 2015. We therefore issue the following 

order:

The previous abatement is continued until January 23, 2015. The appeal will 

be reinstated on this court’s active docket on that date. The record of the hearing 

and supplemental clerk’s record are due on or before January 30, 2015. Appellant’s 

supplemental brief, if any, is due on or before February 10, 2015. The State’s 

response to appellant’s supplemental brief, if any, is due on or before February 20, 

2015. If the parties do not intend to file supplemental briefing, it is requested that 

they promptly inform the court. It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                 <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Sep-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                      Oct-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1996                     
<CASH>                               19,525                                     
<SECURITIES>                              0         
<RECEIVABLES>                       494,244      
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                           3,234      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    520,877      
<PP&E>                              159,285           
<DEPRECIATION>                       59,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      726,988     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               355,394
<BONDS>                             105,444            
<COMMON>                            251,640       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0   
<OTHER-SE>                                0  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        726,988
<SALES>                             195,339           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    195,339
<CGS>                                     0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       123,358   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (17,471)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      54,510         
<INCOME-TAX>                         20,000             
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0   
<CHANGES>                                 0        
<NET-INCOME>                         34,510          
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .01       
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .01        
        

</TABLE>