alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
          required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
          on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2007-AL1 (the "Exchange Act
          periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
          to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
          light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
          for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
          assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
          securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
          Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
          have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
          disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
          described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
          10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2008

      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
      (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of Countrywide Home
      Loans Servicing LP)
**Exhibit 35**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

 

I, Chris Fielding, Head of Mortgage Backed Funding of Abbey National plc as Servicer under the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement between the Servicer, Holmes Trustees Limited, Holmes Funding Limited and JPMorgan Chase Bank dated 26 July 2000, as amended (the “Agreement”), on behalf of the Servicer and not in my individual capacity, hereby certify that:

 

 

|   | 1.     | I have reviewed the activities performed by the Servicer under the Agreement during the period ending the end of the fiscal year 2007 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | 2.     | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.                                                                                              |

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate on behalf of Abbey National plc this 28th day of March 2008.

 

 

|   | /s/ Chris Fielding          |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Chris Fielding                                                     |
|   | Title: Head of Mortgage Backed Funding                                   |
|   |                                                                     |
#### Matt Gerald GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William SONDERVAN, Commissioner, Division of Corrections; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 06-7094.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 26, 2007.

Decided: March 9, 2007.

Matt Gerald Green, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matt Gerald Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-*207ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Green has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2698

_____________________________

MICHAEL TODD BUTLER,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF TALLAHASSEE RISK 

MANAGEMENT,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

John J. Lazzara, Judge.

Date of Accident: December 23, 2015. 

October 4, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for 

Appellant.

Christopher J. DuBois and Mary E. Cruickshank of DuBois & 

Cruickshank, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Ronnie Clarence HEADEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-8084.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2007.

Decided: March 30, 2007.

Ronnie Clarence Headen, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Clarence Hayden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Headen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Head-en’s motions for appointment of counsel and for a court order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### The TURFGRASS GROUP, INC., and University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CAROLINA FRESH FARMS, INC., Carolina Fresh Farms, L.L.C., FKA Carolina Fresh Farms, Inc., and John A. Fogle, Sr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2014-1017.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 6, 2014.

*895Cecil Duff Nolan, Stuttgart, AR, Damon C. Wlodarczyk, Attorney, Riley Pope & Laney, LLC, Columbia, SC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Christian E. Boesl, Collins *&*Lacy, P.C., Robert F. Goings, Esq., Attorney, Goings Law Firm, LLC, Columbia, SC, for Defendants-Appellees.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellants move for leave to file their appendix out of time and to reinstate their appeal.

On August 4, 2014, this appeal was dismissed for failure to timely file the appendix. The court notes that the appendix was submitted with the motion to reinstate.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to accept the appendix out of time is granted. The joint appendix is accepted for filing.

(2) The mandate is recalled, the court’s August 4, 2014 dismissal order is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated.

(8) This appeal will be placed on the oral argument calendar in due course.
2009-1572.

#### State v. Henry.

Seneca App. No. 13-08-10, 2009-Ohio-3535.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oswaldo Rey BALAM-UN, also known as Oswaldo Balam, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41084

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oswaldo Rey Balam-Un raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Nicholas W. Atencio, the Chief Executive Officer and William D. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of Mainland Resources Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Mainland Resources Inc., for fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Mainland Resources Inc .

Dated:  November 9, 2010



"Nicholas W. Atencio"Nicholas W. Atencio 
Chief Executive Officer



"William D. Thomas"William D. Thomas 
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silica Resources Corporation and will be retained by Mainland Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1




                         MARINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                      METHOD - FAS 128, PRIOR YEAR RESTATED
                                   (UNAUDITED)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Nine Months Ended                     Three Months Ended
                                                                 September 30     September 30        September 30    September 30
                                                                     1998              1997               1998             1997
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

<S>                                                              <C>               <C>                <C>              <C>      
Common shares outstanding at January 1:                             4,421,120         2,701,110         4,421,120         2,701,110

IPO offering, May 7, 1997                                                   0         1,440,000                 0         1,440,000


Other stock transactions in 1997, net:                                      0           202,243                 0           202,243
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------


Common shares outstanding on September 30,:                         4,421,120         4,343,353         4,421,120         4,343,353

Adjustment to weighted average:                                             0          (764,449)                0                 0

                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Weighted average outstanding shares at September 30:                4,421,120         3,578,904         4,421,120         4,343,353
                                                                  ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

Net loss for periods ending September 30,                         $(2,112,782)      $(2,110,912)      $  (866,917)      $  (661,568)

Preferred dividends                                                         0             (5753)                0             (5753)
                                                                  -----------       -----------       -----------       -----------

Adjusted net loss:                                                $(2,112,782)      $(2,116,665)      $  (866,917)      $  (667,321)
                                                                  ===========       ===========       ===========       ===========

 Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:                     $     (0.48)      $     (0.59)      $     (0.20)      $     (0.15)

 Prior Stated                                                                       $     (0.57)                        $     (0.15)
</TABLE>






                 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Buckhead Community
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United
States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2008 
|                       
|/s/ Dawn Kinard        
|Dawn Kinard            
|Chief Financial Officer
947 A.2d 709

#### TRIBUNE-REVIEW PUBLISHING COMPANY, A Pennsylvania Corporation, and Andrew Conte, an Individual, Petitioners v. Leonard BODACK, In his Official Capacity as Member of Pittsburgh City Council, Barbara Burns, In her Official Capacity as Member of Pittsburgh City Council, and The City of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 22, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

> 1. Are itemized cellular telephone bills of an agency open for public inspection under the Right to Know Act?

> 2. Do the personal security and privacy exceptions in the Right to Know Act create legal defenses to access that need not be supported with substantial evidence?
Exhibit 31

                         FORM OF CERTIFICATION TO BE
                           PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K


     Re: Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR1, issued
         pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1,
         2007, between Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, as depositor,
         Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. d/b/a HomEq Servicing, as servicer,
         and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

I, Paul Menefee, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR1 (the
"Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
Report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports;

     4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
material respects; and

     5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
 criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
 except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.


Date: March 28, 2008

By:  /s/Paul Menefee
Paul Menefee
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Office
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

s1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

145305

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145305

COA: 303721

Genesee CC: 10-027141-FC

JOSEPHUS ATCHISON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Michael and Theresa



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 26, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00021

- CV

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Appellant

v.

Michael and Theresa HAYES

, Appellees

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CV00284 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On February 24, 2015, the trial court clerk filed a Notification of Late Record stating the clerk = s record was not filed because appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk = s fee for preparing the record, and appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. It is therefore ORDERED appellant provide written proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order either (1) the clerk = s fee has been paid or arrangements have been mad e to pay the clerk = s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk = s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court