alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from BLC
Financial Services and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                   3,498,000
<SECURITIES>                             5,057,000
<RECEIVABLES>                           31,939,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               641,000
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        10,198,000
<PP&E>                                   1,084,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             342,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          53,281,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,427,000
<BONDS>                                  3,374,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   197,000
<OTHER-SE>                              14,072,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            53,281,000
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        15,729,000
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         8,234,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,158,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          5,337,000
<INCOME-TAX>                             2,111,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3,226,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             3,226,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .15
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6552

ALEXANDER WALDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DANIEL L. HOBBS, Custodian, Jesup Federal Correctional Institution; J. RENÉ JOSEY, US Attorney for SC; JANET RENO, US Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-3782-4-8BF, CR-89-353, CR-90-170) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Walden, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alexander Walden appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) and denying the motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and the order denying the motion to alter or amend and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Walden v. Hobbs , No. CA-00-3782-4-8BF (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 2001 & Mar. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2009-2144.

#### George v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp.

Stark App. No. 2009CA00146, 2009-Ohio-5787. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1477, 2010-Ohio-354, 921 N.E.2d 248. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-419; MM Docket No. 00-237; RM-10006] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document substitutes Channel 285C2 for Channel 274C3 at Window Rock, Arizona, and modifies the license of Station KWIM accordingly, as requested by Western Indian Ministries, Inc.                         *See*65 FR 71080, November 29, 2000. Coordinates used for Channel 285C2 at Window Rock are those of the presently licensed site of Station KWIM, at 35-39-19 NL and 109-01-59 WL.                     

# DATES:

Effective April 2, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-237, adopted February 7, 2001, and released February 16, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Radio broadcasting

Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336. 

      ( print page 12896)    
§ 73.202 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arizona, is amended by removing Channel 274C3 and adding Channel 285C2 at Window Rock. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 01-4918 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.1

Awareness Letter of Independent Accountants

April 30, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 29, 2004 on our review of interim
financial information of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 and included in the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 is
incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-76269, 333-21619, 333-55685, 333-33533, 333-27891, 333-60190, 333-74452,
333-87630 and 333-36092).

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-26297, 333-65379, 333-86222 and 333-88973 of Kontron Mobile Computing, Inc.
(the Company) on Form S-8 of our report dated January 24, 2003 (February 27,
2003 as to the last sentence of Note 2) relating to the financial statements of
the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 31, 2003
EX-35.3
(logo)EMC
Mortgage Corporation
Proven Performance

ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION

I, Mark T. Novachek and Michelle Viner as Officers of EMC Mortgage Corporation
("EMC") as Master Servicer pursuant to the Bear Steams ARM Trust 2007-4 (the
"Agreement") hereby certify that:

1. A review of EMC Master Servicing activities during the period from and
including May 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting
Period") and EMC's Master Servicing performance under the Agreement has been
made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, EMC Master Servicing has
fulfilled all of its obligation under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period in all material respects.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 14th
day of March 2008.

/s/ Mark T. Novachek
Mark T. Novachek
Senior Vice President

/s/ Michelle Viner
Michelle Viner
Manager-Vice President


800 State Highway 121 Bypass, Lewisville, TX 75067-4180
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 293150, Lewisville, TX 75029-3150

(logo) Member
Mortgage Bankers
Association of America
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David
      SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of Richman TaxCredit
      Properties Inc., general partner ofRichman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., generalpartner
      of the RegistrantAugust
      4, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT00-34-003]

Take notice that on February 14, 2001, Dauphin Island Gathering Partners (DIGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the tariff sheet listed below to become effective January 1, 2001. DIGP states that the reason for this filing is to correct a typographical error in four of the negotiated rates. 

Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 9

DIGP states that a copies of this filing are being served on its customers and other interested parties.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-5342  Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2 8 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk May 2 8 , 2021

162 944 ( 39 )

CINDY BRAXTON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 162944

v COA: 351397

Oakland CC: 2018

- 168673

- NO

BEAUMONT HEALTH TROY, WILLIAM

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, and SARA A.

MOOSA,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

_________ _____________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant s

- appell ee s to extend the time

for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

will be accepted as timely filed if submitt ed on or before June 17 , 2021

.
#### Terrence Kevin BETHEA, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Appellee.

No. 10-5065.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 15, 2010.

*375Terrence Kevin Bethea, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before: ROGERS, GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. With the exception of defendants appealing or defending in criminal cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 3, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s case. There is no legal basis for appellant’s claim that he is entitled to have good time credit earned prior to his release on parole applied to his sentence following parole revocation. *See*D.C.Code § 24-406(a) (“If the order of parole shall be revoked, the prisoner, unless subsequently reparoled, shall serve the remainder of the sentence originally imposed less any commutation for good conduct which may be earned by him *after*his return to custody.” (emphasis added)); *Jones v. Clemmer,*163 F.2d 852, 853 (D.C.Cir.1947) (“[A]ny right to commutation which [a prisoner] may have earned at any time before he was recommitted to the reformatory was conditional and was forfeited by his violation of parole.”).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
EXHIBIT 3.1.2


ROSS MILLER
SECRETARY OF STATE
204 NORTH CARSON STREET, SUITE 1
CARSON CITY, NEVADA 89701-4520
(775) 684-5708
WEBSITE: WWW.NVSOS.GOV

                                 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF     DOCUMENT NUMBER
                                 /s/ ROSS MILLER            20090529221-72
                                 ROSS MILLER
                                 SECRETARY OF STATE         FILING DATE AND TIME
                                 STATE OF NEVADA            07/07/2009 8:00 AM

                                                            ENTITY NUMBER
                                                            E0358282006-3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                      (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390)


USE BLACK INK ONLY - DO NOT HIGHLIGHT         ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY


             CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                         FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS
         (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390 - AFTER ISSUANCE OF STOCK)


1. NAME OF CORPORATION:

   Mainland Resources Inc.

2. THE ARTICLES HAVE BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: (PROVIDE ARTICLE NUMBERS, IF
   AVAILABLE)

   Article 3. The authorized capital of the company shall consist of 400,000,000
   shares of common stock, par value $0.0001.

3. THE VOTE BY WHICH THE STOCKHOLDERS HOLDING SHARES IN THE CORPORATION
   ENTITILING THEM TO EXERCISE A LEAST A MAJORITY OF THE VOTING POWER, OR SUCH
   GREATER PROPORTION OF THE VOTING POWER AS MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE CASE OF A
   VOTE BY CLASSES OR SERIES, OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE
   ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION* HAVE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT IS:

   Not required

4. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FILING: (OPTIONAL)

   (Must not be later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)

5. SIGNATURE: (REQUIRED)

   X /s/______________________
        (Signature of Officer

     CFO/Secretary-Treasurer


*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the
amendment must be approved by the vote. In addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the
voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless to
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.


IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit with the
proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 8-K**



CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report: February 25, 2005
  Date of earliest event reported: February 24, 2005

**PFIZER INC.**
  (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|**Delaware**                                                                                       | **1-3619**               | **13-5315170**                      
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State or other Jurisdiction of incorporation)                                                     | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|**235 East 42nd Street 
          New York, New York**(Address of principal executive offices)**** |                          | **10017**
        (Zip Code)        

> Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(212) 573-2323

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended
  to simultaneously satisfy the obligation of the registrant under any of the
  following provisions:

[ ] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17
  CFR 230.425)

[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17
  CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange
  Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange
  Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))



|Item 5.02 | Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of
      Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers
|--------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On February 24, 2005, the Board of Directors of Pfizer Inc. accepted the offer
  of Franklin D. Raines not to stand for re-election to the Board at Pfizer Inc.’s
  annual meeting of shareholders in April. Mr. Raines will continue as a member
  of the Board of Directors and as a member of the Compensation Committee and
  of the Science and Technology Committee until the annual meeting on April 28,
  2005.



**SIGNATURE**

Under the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
  has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the authorized undersigned.

|                         |  | PFIZER INC.                                                     
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |                                                                 
|                         |  | By: /s/ Margaret M. Foran
        Margaret M. Foran             
|                         |  | Title: Vice President-Corporate
        Governance and Secretary
|Dated: February 25, 2005 |  |                                                                 

>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES MATEO

- MATEO,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 70873

Agency No. A205

- 536

- 302

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

S ubmitted September 1 2 , 2018 **

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Andres Mateo

- Mateo

, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petition s for review

of the Board of Imm igration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We

have j urisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen , and review de novo questions of law, including

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 70873

claims of due process violations due to ineffective assistance. Mohammed v.

Gonzales , 400 F.3d 785, 791

- 92 (9th Cir. 2005) . We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Mateo

- Mateo’s motion to

reopen due to lack of prejudice from his prior counsel’s performance , where the

evidence submitted with the motion did not show plausible grounds for any relief

.

See Martinez

- Hernandez v. Holder , 778 F.3d 1086, 1088 (9th Cir. 2015) (to

establish prejudice resulting from ineffective assistance o f counsel, petitioner must

show, at a minimum, that the asserted ground for relief is at least plausible )

.

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Mateo

- Mateo’s remaining

contentions regarding prior co unsel ’s performance and compliance with the

procedural requirements of Matter of Lozada

, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). See

Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are

not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.