alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Nos. 34847-1-II; 34857-8-II.

Division Two.

August 7, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Roscoe Kendrick Jordan, *Appellant.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 04-1-05986-2, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered May 5, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Van Deren, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 11, 2016
No. 04

- 16

- 00275

- CR
Gabriel Barrera ZAMARRIPA,

Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

T rial Court No. 2014CR5916 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On April 29, 2016 , appellant filed a “Notice of A ppeal From Negotiated Plea” in cause numbers 2014

- CR

- 5915, 2014

- CR

- 5916, and 2014

- CR

- 5319. It appears from the record before us, however, that cause numbers 2014

- CR

- 5915 and 2014

- CR

- 5916 were dismissed pursuant to the State’s motion on March 23, 2016 and no final judgment exists in relation to these matters. There being no final judgment or app ealable order signed by the trial court, i t appears this co urt lacks jurisdiction over these appeal s
. See Ex parte Culver , 932 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 1996, pet ref’d) (appellate courts generally only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction). Accordingly, appellant is hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing, no later than May 31, 2016 , why these appeal s should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of May, 2016

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2


         Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Robert G. Costantini, as Chief Financial Officer of First Aviation Services
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

(1)      the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
         period ended April 30, 2004 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S.
         Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  June 14, 2004


                                                     /s/ Robert G. Costantini
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Robert G. Costantini
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Joseph K. Jachinowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|April 16, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOSEPH K. JACHINOWSKI                                                      
|               |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|               |  |  |  | Joseph K. Jachinowski Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
CHRISTIANA TRUST, a D ivision of W ilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as T rustee of ARLP Trust 3

,
Appellant,

v.

DAVID R. SUTTON, JR., Personal Representative of the Estate of David R. Sutton; et al

. ,
Appelle es

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIR ST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5618

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 12, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval Cou nty

. L. Haldane Taylor , Judge

.

Michael J. Posner and Labeed A. Choud h ry of Ward, Damon, Posner, Pheterson & Bleau, P.L., West Palm Beach , for Appellant.

Cristine M. Russell of Rogers Towers, P.A., Jacksonville , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B. L. THOMAS

, ROWE

, and WINSOR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raj Kumar BANSAL, a/k/a The Old Man, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7165.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 26, 2011.

*664Raj Kumar Bansal, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Grooms, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Raj Kumar Bansal appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to reduce his sentence based on his assistance to the government. A district court may modify a defendant’s sentence only as provided by statute. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) (providing circumstances in which a term of imprisonment can be altered once imposed); *United States v. Dunphy,*551 F.3d 247, 250 (4th Cir.2009). Because this case does not involve a motion by the Director of the Bureau of Prisons or a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 motion by the United States Attorney, we conclude that the district court correctly determined that it lacked the authority to alter the sentence imposed. Accordingly, we affirm its judgment, and dismiss Bansal’s motion for a expedited ruling on the existing pleadings as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EX-33.12
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and
for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1l22(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

l. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: /s/ Shari Gillund

Its: Senior Vice President


Dated: February 29, 2008
[No. 34697-4-II.

Division Two.

September 18, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Paul I. Nunn, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 04-1-04403-2, Thomas P. Larkin, J., entered March 10, 2006. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Penoyar, J.
EX-10.4.4





 Exhibit 10.4.4 

 

			
	



	  	 InMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

340-200 Granville St.

Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4

Canada


 3 July 2019 
 Dear Eric
Hsu, 
 On behalf of InMed’s Board of Directors, I am pleased to inform you of the following compensation related items: 

 

	1.	 Salary Increase 



Based on several criteria, including the Company’s overall financial position as well as your performance in your current role,
your annual base salary will be increased 3% to $298,700, effective July 1, 2019. The salary will continue to be paid semi-monthly, in arrears, and less any statutory deductions. 

 

	2.	 Annual Bonus for FY2018-19 



Based on overall corporate achievement of key goals as well as your individual contributions, you will receive a one-time bonus of $59,508, as calculated below. This will be paid in the 15 July 2019 payroll period, less statutory deductions. 

Note that the payout of any such future bonuses will be subject to achievements of corporate and personal goals, as defined by the Executive
Team and subject to the financial position of the Company, as determined at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors. 
 Thank you once again for your
past and continued contributions to InMed! 
 Best Regards, 
  





 
 Eric A. Adams 
 CEO +
President 













																													
	 Employee
	  	Goals
(x75)	 	  	Personal
(x/25)	 	  	Total	 	  	%	 	 	Salary 2018-19	 	  	Bonus Target	 	 	Total Bonus	 
	 Eric Hsu
	  	 	62	 	  	 	23.5	 	  	 	85.5/100	 	  	 	85.5	% 	 	$	232,000	 	  	 	30	% 	 	$	59,508
<PAGE>
 
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11
                                                                      ----------


                               BROOKSTONE, INC.
                                        
           COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS)
                               PER COMMON SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                      -------------------------------------
                                                       May 2, 1998             May 3, 1997
                                                      ------------             ------------
<S>                                                   <C>                      <C>
Net loss                                               $  (4,417)               $ (3,773)
                                                      ============             ============ 
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                                                7,889                   7,783
  
Effect of dilutive securities:
  Stock Options                                               --                      --
                                                      ------------             ------------
Weighted average number of common shares
 as adjusted                                                7,889                   7,783
                                                      ============             ============  
Net loss per share basic/diluted                       $    (0.56)              $   (0.48)
                                                      ============             ============ 
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10484

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WILLIAM RAY NOBLES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:09-CR-45-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William Ray Nobles

has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Nobles has filed a response. Our

independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Nobles’s response discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 14, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10484 Document: 00511381564 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2011
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Larry D. Key

Larry D. Key, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ John Hopkins

John Hopkins, C.F.O.
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).  If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843).  Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 30, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:                

*1.  Rivoli BanCorp, Inc.*, Macon, Georgia; to become a bank holding company by acquiring at least 80 percent of the voting shares of Rivoli Bank & Trust, Macon, Georgia.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 28, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-5271 Filed 3-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 10.51
 Amendment No. 1 to
Management Employment Agreement
  Background
    e.
    
    Notwithstanding any contrary provision contained in this Agreement,
upon the first occurrence of a Trigger Event (as hereafter defined), the
Employee shall be entitled to receive (i) severance equal to 100% of his then
current annual salary and applicable bonus (calculated assuming 100%
achievement and pro rated based on the number of days elapsed during the year
prior to the date on which the termination of employment occurred), payable in
one lump sum (ii) continuation of Benefits (as hereafter defined), subject to
applicable benefit plan provisions, for one year (or, if earlier, until such
time as Employee shall have obtained new employment with benefits substantially
comparable to the Benefits); and (iii) accelerated vesting of all stock
options, such that all stock options held by Employee immediately prior to the
date of Change of Control (as hereafter defined) shall become exercisable in
full as of the date of the Change of Control. In addition, upon the first
occurrence of a Trigger Event, any restrictions with respect to any restricted
stock or restricted stock units granted to the Employee under the Companys
equity incentive plans shall lapse and any conditions applicable to any
long-term performance award or performance shares granted to the Employee under
such plans shall be terminated.




---



##### 



(i)
    
    the acquisition of stock of the Company by any person
or persons acting as a group that results in such person or group
holding more than 50% of the stock of the Company by market value or
voting power;
 (ii)
    
    the acquisition of stock of the Company by any person
or persons acting as a group within any 12-month period representing at
least 30% of the voting power of the Companys stock;
 (iii)
    
    the election or appointment as director representing a
majority of the Companys Board of Directors of persons not endorsed by
a majority of the members of the Companys Board of Directors prior to
their respective election or appointment; or
 (iv)
    
    the acquisition of assets of the Company by any person
or persons acting as a group within any 12-month period representing at
least 40% of the total gross fair market value of all assets of the
Company immediately prior to such acquisition.
   2




---



##### 



eResearchTechnology, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Michael McKelvey

Michael McKelveyPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Amy FurlongAmy Furlong
  3
MACE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                   Exhibit 11
                  Schedule of Computation of Primary Net Income
                                    Per Share

For the twelve months ended December 31,
                                                         1997           1996
                                                     -----------    -----------
Common stock outstanding at
   end of period                                       7,081,666      6,825,000

Adjustments to ending shares to arrive
 at weighted average for the year:
Shares issued for MSP Retail, Inc. Acquisition(2)        121,972             --

Shares issued for MSP, Inc. Acquisition(3)                39,671             --
Shares issued to former President and CEO(1)                  --          5,082
                                                     -----------    -----------
                                                       6,920,023      6,819,918
                                                     ===========    ===========
Net loss                                             $(1,686,943)   $  (252,348)
                                                     ===========    ===========

Net loss per share                                   $      (.24)   $      (.04)
                                                     ===========    ===========

Calculated as follows:
   number of shares outstanding multiplied by the reciprocal of the number of
   days outstanding divided by the number of days in the period.

      (1) Shares offered for the twelve months:
          April 3, 1996                            20,000*(93/366)        5,082
                                                                      
      (2) Shares offered for the twelve months:                       
          September 10, 1997                      176,666*(252/365)     121,972
                                                                      
      (3) Shares offered for the twelve months:                       
          July 1, 1997                             80,000*(181/365)      39,671