alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.58

[First Union National Bank Letterhead]


Mr. Bruce Johnson
Sr. Vice President
PRWW, Ltd.
30 South 17th Street, 8th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103



July 20, 2001



                           NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF LOAN

RE:      Promissory Note from PRWW, Ltd., eResearchTechnology, Inc., and PRWW
         Investment Corp. ("Borrower") to First Union National Bank ("First
         Union") in the original principal amount of $3,000,000.00 dated October
         6, 2000, including any amendments (the "Note").

         Obligor # 6996322254 Obligation # 18

Dear Bruce:

                  First Union has agreed to extend the term of the Note, which
         will mature or has matured on June 30, 2001. Accordingly, this letter
         shall constitute First Union's agreement and formal notice to you, as
         follows:

         Extension. First Union hereby extends, on the same terms and conditions
         as presently in effect, the maturity of the Note to August 31, 2001, at
         which time the outstanding principal balance, accrued interest and all
         other amounts due under the Note shall become due and payable. All
         periodic payments required under the Note shall be made during this
         extension period.

         No Other Changes. Extension on the maturity date as stated herein is
         the only change to the Note. Except as extended by this letter, the
         Note and all other Loan Documents (as defined in the Note) shall
         continue in full force and effect. Should you have any questions, do
         not hesitate to call.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        First Union National Bank



                                         By: /s/ Ellen Dodel
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Ellen Gibbin Dodel
Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 I, Louis D. Paolino, Jr., certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mace Security
International, Inc.;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(c)) for the registrant and we have:

 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


 Date: March 11, 2004

 /s/ Louis D. Paolino, Jr.
 -------------------------
Louis D. Paolino, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and President
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2678 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2678

To restrict the implementation of proposals of the Task Force on Bureau 
                   of Indian Affairs Reorganization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 1993

   Mr. Thomas of Wyoming (for himself, Mr. Richardson, Mr. Young of 
   Alaska, and Mr. Calvert) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restrict the implementation of proposals of the Task Force on Bureau 
                   of Indian Affairs Reorganization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF REPORT OF TASK FORCE ON 
              BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS.

    (a) Restriction.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no 
reorganization proposal of the Task Force on Bureau of Indian Affairs 
Reorganization established pursuant to Public Law 101-512 may be 
implemented until the Task Force has recommended its implementation to 
the Secretary of the Interior and such proposal has been submitted to 
and approved by the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate.
    (b) Exception.--The Bureau of Indian Affairs may submit to the 
committees referred to in subsection (a) a reorganization proposal 
related only to management improvements, together with Task Force 
comments or recommendations, to the committees for their review and 
disposition.

                                 <all>
```
942 A.2d 892

#### Allen GINN, Petitioner v. John J. POSERINA, Jr., Lynn Abraham, Esq., Vivian T. Miller, Deputy Superintendent Diguglielmo, Respondents.

No. 177 EM 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 13, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2008, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is granted. The Habeas Corpus Ad Subjiciendum is denied.
#### Gregory T. REDMOND, Appellant v. FOUR SEASON HOTEL.

No. 10-2605.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 Oct. 29, 2010.

Opinion filed: Feb. 14, 2011.

*454Gregory T. Redmond, Philadelphia, PA, pro se.

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In May 2010, Gregory T. Redmond commenced this action by filing a pro se complaint against the Four Seasons Hotel in Philadelphia, claiming that, on March 3, 2006, a security guard prevented Redmond from entering the hotel lobby because of his race. Redmond sought damages for an alleged violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982. The District Court granted *informa pauperis*status and dismissed the complaint *sua sponte*under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), noting that the suit is barred under the doctrine of *res judicata*and also time-barred under the statute of limitations. Redmond appeals.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review is plenary. *Allah v. Seiverling,*229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir.2000). We must dismiss an *in forma pauperis*appeal if we determine that it is “frivolous or malicious.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); *see Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 324-25, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

The District Court correctly concluded that this suit is barred. Redmond raised precisely the same allegation against the Four Seasons Hotel in a prior suit, which the District Court dismissed on the merits. *See*E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 09-cv-05698. In addition, the District Court denied Redmond’s motion for reconsideration in the prior suit and expressly rejected the merits of his claims under §§ 1981 and 1982 for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Given the prior dismissal on the merits, the doctrine of *res judicata*bars Redmond “from initiating a second suit against the same adversary based on the same ‘cause of action’ as the first suit.” *Duhaney v. Att’y Gen.,*621 F.3d 340, 347 (3d Cir.2010). In addition, as fully explained by the District Court, Redmond’s claims are plainly time-barred under the statute of limitations. Accordingly, we will dismiss this appeal under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. William Blake SESCIL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10623.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 6, 2011.

Denise Bridges Williams, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Reynolds Biggs, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Sherylynn Ann Kime-Goodwin, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*759Before KING, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The issue raised in this case is whether Defendant-Appellant William Sescil was sentenced to a term of revocation imprisonment in excess of the amount authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). The district court sentenced Sescil to 20 months’ imprisonment upon revoking his second term of supervised release. Sescil argues that his sentence exceeded the amount of revocation imprisonment authorized by § 3583(e)(3) because that subsection caps the aggregate amount of revocation imprisonment for his offense at the amount of supervised release authorized by § 3583(b) for the same offense, which is three years for his Class D felony. He argues that, because he had already served 18 months’ imprisonment on a prior revocation of his supervised release, the district court could not sentence him to more than 18 months’ imprisonment when it revoked his supervised release in this instance.

We addressed this precise issue in *United States v. Hampton,*633 F.3d 334 (5th Cir.2011), which we have decided today. In *Hampton,*we held that the amount of supervised release authorized for an offense by § 3583(b) does not cap the aggregate amount of revocation imprisonment authorized by § 3583(e)(3) for the same offense. *Id.*at 338. When Sescil violated the terms of his second supervised release, § 3583(e)(3) authorized the district court to sentence him to a maximum of two years’ imprisonment as a revocation sentence, without reference to the amount of revocation imprisonment he had previously served. *See id.*Accordingly, the district court’s judgment revoking Sescil’s supervised release and sentencing him to 20 months’ imprisonment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 17, 2004

                                 By: /s/ Barry Mindes
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Barry Mindes
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Meeting; Sunshine Act

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, March 30, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-5052 Filed 2-27-01; 11:04 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
EXHIBIT
23.2
































CONSENT
OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-148828 on Form S-8 of Belvedere SoCal of our Independent Auditors’ Report
dated May 24, 2007, regarding the statement of financial condition of
Professional Business Bank as of December 31, 2006, and the related statement of
operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2006, which appear in this annual report on Form 10-K of Belvedere
SoCal.





/s/ Vavrinek, Trine, Day
& Co., LLP





Laguna
Hills, California


March 31,
2008
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00006

- CV
South Coast Spine & Rehabilitation , PA

v. Brownsville Independent School District

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2008

- CCL

- 01297

JUDGMENT T HE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for fur t he r proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 12, 2019
EXHIBIT
8.1
 Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited
List of Subsidiaries
 Jurisdiction ofName
    

IncorporationCyber Power Group Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsYingli Green Energy Capital Holding Company Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsYingli Green Energy (International) Holding Company Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsYingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
    
    DelawareYingli Green Energy Europe GmbH
    
    GermanyYingli Green Energy Greece Sales GmbH
    
    GermanyCyber Lighting Holding Company Limited
    
    Hong KongYingli Green Energy Capital Holding (Hong Kong) Company Limited
    
    Hong KongYingli
Green Energy International Trading Limited
    
    Hong KongYingli
Green Energy Hong Kong Trading Limited
    
    Hong KongBaoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCBeijing Gelin Science and Electronics Technologies Co., Ltd
    
    PRCChengdu Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCFine Silicon Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCYingli Energy (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCYingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd.
    
    PRCYingli Shuntong (Beijing) International Forwarder Co. Ltd
    
    PRC
Exhibit 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 Entity
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation or FormationCallbookers Limited
    
    EnglandCheap Tickets Limited
    
    EnglandCheap Tickets Europe Limited
    
    Englandebookers Limited
    
    Englandebookers.com Deutschland GmbH
    
    Germanyebookers.com SA
    
    Switzerlandebookers.ie Ltd
    
    Irelandebookers.nl BV
    
    Netherlandsebookers.no AS
    
    Norwayebookers Scandinavia AB
    
    SwedenFlairview Travel Hotel Club S.L.
    
    SpainFlairview Travel Limited
    
    EnglandFlairview Travel Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaFlightbookers Limited
    
    EnglandHotel Club Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaHotelclub Limited
    
    EnglandHotelClub KK
    
    JapanInsurancebookers Limited
    
    EnglandInternetwork Publishing Corporation
    
    FloridaLa Compagnie Des Voyages SA
    
    FranceMr Jet A/S
    
    DenmarkMr Jet AS
    
    NorwayMr Jet Oy
    
    FinlandNational Internet Travel Agency
    
    FloridaNeat Group Corporation
    
    DelawareO Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz Away, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Financial Corp.
    
    DelawareOrbitz for Business, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz, Inc.
    
    DelawareOrbitz (Israel) Ltd.
    
    IsraelOrbitz, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Mexico Services, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoOrbitz Travel Insurance Services, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide (UK) Limited
    
    EnglandOrbitz Worldwide Development, LLC
    
    DelawareOrbitz Worldwide International, Inc.
    
    DelawareOWW Fulfillment Services, Inc.
    
    TennesseeOy ebookers Finland Ltd
    
    FinlandParagon Travel Limited (ROHQ) Philippines Inc.
    
    PhilippinesParagon Travel Limited
    
    Hong KongRaccoon Acquisition I, LLC
    
    DelawareTerren Corporation
    
    CanadaTravel Acquisition, LLC
    
    DelawareTravel Acquisition Corporation Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaTrip Network, Inc.
    
    DelawareViajes ebookers S.L.
    
    Spain
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31,
      2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Edward H. Myles, Vice President of Finance and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:





(1)  The
      Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 22, 2006
              */s/
                Edward H. Myles**Edward H. Myles*Vice President of Finance & Chief
                Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                              |                                 |
|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                        | **Dark                Dynamite, Inc.****(Registrant)**            |
|                                   |                                                         |                            |
| Date: November                14, 2005 | By:                                                     | /s/ Xiaojun                Wang |
|                                        | Xiaojun                WangChief                Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         133,438
<SECURITIES>                                 1,851,140
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,068,970
<PP&E>                                       1,504,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                 939,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,638,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         7,842
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,535,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,638,856
<SALES>                                          9,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,354
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,764,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,640,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,640,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,640,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>