CHAPTER 3 

MONITORING OWNER COMPLIANCE

 This chapter describes procedures agencies should follow in monitoring 

owner compliance with the requirements for AHP properties. Four phases of 

monitoring agency activity for properties are introduced, along with additional 

responsibilities of monitoring agencies. As is discussed in 6.3, FDIC has 

developed and distributed the AHP Compliance Monitoring System (CMS) 

software. Although this Chapter does specifically refer to CMS, it is expected 

that agencies will utilize this tool wherever possible. 

3.1 OVERVIEW 

 An owner's compliance responsibilities begin at final closing of an AHP 

purchase. Monitoring agency activities fall into four distinct phases (each 

described in later sections of this chapter): 

1. Initial Agency/Owner Contact 

2. Property Closing Activities 

3. Pre-Compliance Activities 

4. Ongoing Compliance and Monitoring Activities 

 As noted in Chapter 1, owners may purchase multifamily properties 

individually or in bulk. The procedures presented in the following sections apply 

to monitoring properties in rental use under either type of purchase. 

 Because most properties purchased in a bulk transaction have their own 

LURA with occupancy requirements specific to the property, agency staff can 

monitor these properties in the same way they monitor an individual sale.9

 

Additional instructions for monitoring condominium properties sold in bulk are 

found in Chapter 7, and guidance regarding bulk purchasers of single family 

properties is in Chapter 8. 

3.2 INITIAL AGENCY/OWNER CONTACT 

 

 9 RTC made a very limited number of special bulk sales where a Master LURA allows flexibility in how the owner 

meets the occupancy requirements among the properties in the purchase. If FDIC has informed agency staff that 

they will need to monitor such a purchase, the special instructions in Appendix J should be followed.

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-1 9/20/01 
 A monitoring agency's first contact with a property owner and 

management agent generally occurs prior to final closing.10 During this period, 

monitoring agencies should provide assistance to help buyers become familiar 

with the compliance procedures for AHP properties and work with FDIC to make 

preparations for monitoring these properties. A monitoring agency's primary 

responsibilities during the period prior to property closing include: 

Key Initial Contact Activities

• Distribute compliance information materials 

• Offer compliance training 

• Plan future monitoring activities 

A. Distributing Compliance Information Materials 

 Approximately 30 days prior to final closing, FDIC will contact the agency 

and provide the names and addresses of anticipated purchasers of AHP 

properties. At this point, the agency should contact the prospective owners, 

provide a compliance information packet and schedule a time to review the 

program's compliance procedures with the owner. 

 The compliance packet given to owners should contain the following 

materials. 

Compliance Materials

◊ Start-Up Instructions for New Owners 

◊ AHP Owner's Compliance Manual 

◊ Current income limits and maximum rents 

◊ Monitoring Agency Fact Sheet 

 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-2 9/20/01 

10 In some cases, property sales were completed before the date an agency signed its monitoring agreement 

with FDIC. Section 3.3.D below describes the procedures for establishing initial contact with these owners and 

preparing to monitor their properties.
 The state monitoring agency may charge a nominal fee to cover the cost 

of printing and forwarding the materials. 

 Start-Up Instructions should highlight procedures owners must follow 

once they have closed on a property, identify program materials (e.g., Owner's 

Compliance Manual) where descriptions of these procedures can be found, and 

describe the administrative requirements owners will need to meet for 

compliance. For example, agencies may want to include the standard schedule 

owners will need to follow in submitting their monthly compliance reports. 

 The AHP Owner's Compliance Manual, together with the current income 

limits and maximum rents, will help owners familiarize themselves with program 

requirements and procedures they will need to know once the sale of the 

property is final. If the owner has access to a computer, he should be provided 

with a copy of ODEP software and encouraged to prepare all reports 

electronically. Monitoring agencies should develop and distribute a fact sheet 

that introduces the agency, describes its role as monitor of AHP properties, and 

provides important staff and telephone contacts for the agency. 

B. Introducing AHP Compliance Procedures 

 After forwarding the compliance packet to prospective owners, agencies 

are encouraged to schedule and conduct an initial meeting to discuss the 

procedures AHP owners need to follow. This meeting is an excellent opportunity 

for the monitoring agency to open lines of communication with the owner and the 

management agent, as well as to facilitate a review of the requirements as 

outlined in the manual. Depending on the resources of the monitoring agency, 

this task might be performed as part of a group training session or, in states with 

a limited number of FDIC properties, this may be accomplished in a one-to-one 

meeting with the responsible parties. 

C. Planning Future Monitoring Activities 

 As FDIC offers AHP properties for sale, it will provide monitoring agencies 

with basic property data given to prospective buyers, including: 

◊ location; 

◊ total number of units; 

◊ number of units by bedroom size; and 

◊ an FDIC contact person. 

This information can help the agency plan its future monitoring activities. 

3.3 PROPERTY CLOSING ACTIVITIES 

 A number of key activities need to take place at or after property closing: 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-3 9/20/01 
Key Property Closing Activities

◊ Agency receives key items from property closing 

◊ Agency initiates compliance reporting schedule 

◊ Agency creates a property monitoring file 

A. Key Items from Property Closing 

 FDIC will provide the monitoring agency with the following items 

assembled at property closing: 

◊ a copy of the property's LURA; 

◊ specific data on the buyer and property; 

◊ the most recently available listing of occupied units; and 

◊ the first year's monitoring fee from the owner. 

FDIC will transmit these items to the agency within five business days after the 

date of closing. 

B. Establish the Compliance Reporting Schedule 

 Once a monitoring agency has received notice that a property has closed, 

monitoring staff should establish the schedule for the owner to submit monthly 

compliance reports. The schedule should specify the starting and ending date of 

the reporting period, as well as the deadline for submitting the report to the 

agency. 

 For example, an agency might set a reporting period that runs from the 

16th day of the current month to the 15th day of the next month, with the report 

due to the agency within 10 days after the end of the period (the 25th). 

C. Create a Property Monitoring File 

 To assure that adequate records will be kept regarding a property and its 

compliance status, monitoring agencies should establish a monitoring file for all 

new properties. The completion of this task should occur in a timely manner. 

The basic monitoring file contents should include: 

Property Monitoring File Contents

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-4 9/20/01 

◊ Property LURA 
◊ Property Data 

◊ Owner and manager information 

◊ Unit listings at closing 

◊ Owner compliance reports 

◊ Correspondence regarding the property 

◊ Notices of non-compliance 

The first four items will be provided by FDIC at or before closing. Copies of all 

owner compliance reports and the results of the agency's review should be 

added to the file as they are processed. Copies of all correspondence with the 

owner should be kept in the file for a period of at least three years. Finally, all 

notices of non-compliance should be recorded in the property's file. 

 These are recommended inclusions in the files. The agency may wish to 

expand this list to include items particular to this property. 

D. Existing Sales 

 AHP properties that were acquired prior to the time an agency assumed 

its monitoring responsibilities are referred to as “existing sales”. The procedures 

for establishing contact with owners of these properties differ from new sales, 

because property closing occurred before the agency set up its monitoring 

operation. For these properties, most of the activities that fall under the Initial 

Contact and Property Closing phases for new sales will need to take place 

shortly after agencies assume their monitoring responsibilities. This section 

provides guidance to agencies on the steps to take in preparing to monitor 

existing sales. 

 FDIC Support

 Once an agency signs the Compliance Monitoring MOU, FDIC staff will 

send a list of the existing sales under its jurisdiction and copies of the LURAs for 

these properties. FDIC will also send a letter to each owner of an existing sale 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-5 9/20/01 
property indicating that the monitoring agency will be contacting them and 

reminding them that they need to pay the annual monitoring fee to the agency. 

 Preparing to Monitor Existing Sales

 Once agencies receive the list of existing sales in their areas, they 

should: 

◊ send each owner a letter introducing the agency, its role and the contact 

persons; 

◊ include copies of the compliance information packet for owners (see Section 

3.2-A); 

◊ schedule an introductory meeting or orientation session with the new 

owners; 

◊ request a copy of the current rent roll or unit listing and any additional 

information about the owner or the property needed to begin monitoring 

owner compliance; 

◊ invoice owners for the first year's monitoring fee; 

◊ inform the owners of the schedule for submitting the compliance reports; and 

◊ set up a property monitoring file. 

 As with new sales, agencies with only a few owners may decide that the 

best way to introduce them to the program is through individual meetings, while 

agencies with a number of owners may prefer to hold a group orientation or 

training session. 

 When preparing to monitor existing sales, agencies will not need to 

gather information on an owner's past activities. Agency monitoring 

responsibilities for existing sales begin at the time the Compliance Monitoring 

MOU was signed. By obtaining a copy of the most recent rent roll, an agency 

can assess the current occupancy of the property and prepare to monitor the 

owner's efforts to bring the property into compliance. 

 To invoice owners for the first year's monitoring fee, agencies should use 

the calculation described in Section 2.7.A to determine the amount of the fee for 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-6 9/20/01 
 each property.11 When sending the invoice, agencies should advise the owner 

of the annual fee period established for the property and the period covered by 

the fee on the invoice. If the current fee period is less than 12 months, the 

agency should prorate the fee accordingly. Section 3.7.C describes the 

procedures for invoicing and collecting the monitoring fee from owners after the 

first year. 

3.4 PRE-COMPLIANCE MONITORING 

 Once a property sale is final, the agency begins monitoring owner efforts 

to obtain the required number of VLI and LI-QUs. The period between closing 

and the time the property reaches full compliance with the LURA is referred to as 

the Pre-Compliance period. 

 FDIC has established a goal for properties to reach full compliance within 

two years. However, the actual length of time may vary depending on the 

occupancy status and condition of the property at time of purchase, as well as 

the rate of turnover. Regardless of the circumstances, owners must follow the 

required procedures for renting available units until they have met fully the setasides established in the LURA. 

 To encourage owners/managers to take action to minimize the PreCompliance period, the agency should stress the Program's reduced reporting 

requirements (annual rather than monthly) and increased flexibility in renting 

vacant units once the owners reach full compliance. Ultimately, the requirement 

to hold available units vacant, and the resulting lost revenue, should be sufficient 

incentive for owners to seek full compliance. 

 Agency monitoring activities during this Pre-Compliance phase include 

the following: 

Key Pre-Compliance Activities

◊ Review monthly compliance reports 

◊ Verify property compliance 

Once an owner fully complies with the property's occupancy requirements, the 

agency begins On-going Compliance monitoring (see Section 3.5 below). 

A. Review of Monthly Compliance Reports 

 

 11 If the LURA for a property was signed more than 12 months prior to the date the agency assumed its 

monitoring responsibilities, the agency may adjust the base fee for changes in inflation as presented in Section 2.7-B.

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-7 9/20/01 
 During the Pre-Compliance period, owners need to follow the program's 

procedures for leasing available units until they reach the required occupancy by 

LI and VLI tenants. To document their compliance with these procedures, 

owners must submit monthly reports to the monitoring agency showing the 

occupancy status of the property. 

 Monitoring agencies should review owners' monthly compliance reports to 

ensure that they are following the required procedures to designate the 

necessary number of QUs. The monthly reports must contain completed AHP 

Compliance Report forms (see Appendix H) and copies of the TICs for each 

newly designated QU and recertification of designated QUs performed since the 

last report. Monitoring staff must review these reports and check the following 

areas for compliance with occupancy procedures: 

◊ the leasing of vacant units; 

◊ the status of VLI and Total Set-Asides; 

◊ the compliance of rents charged for QUs; and 

◊ the accuracy and completeness of Tenant Income Certifications. 

 If a monthly report is not received by the deadline established by the 

agency, monitoring staff should immediately inform the owner that the report is 

late. If the report is not received within 10 days of the original deadline, the 

agency may consider the owner to be out of compliance and should follow the 

procedures in Chapter 4 to compel the owner to report in a timely manner. In 

cases where the owner has a history of late reporting, the agency does not need 

to wait 10 days to make the determination of non-compliance. 

 Monitor Vacant Units

 As discussed in Section 2.5, the procedures owners must follow when 

leasing vacant units during the Pre-Compliance period depend on whether a 

property's vacancies exceed the additional number of QUs needed to meet the 

Total Set-Aside. If a compliance report shows that the property has not met the 

Total Set-Aside, monitoring staff should determine the number of additional QUs 

needed. This amount is the number of vacant units the owner should hold 

available for Qualified Tenants. 

 To assess whether an owner has properly leased vacant units during the 

past month, monitoring staff should refer to the previous compliance report and 

determine whether the number of vacancies met or exceeded the number of 

additional QUs needed. 

◊ If the number of vacancies was less than or equal to the number of QUs 

needed, monitoring staff should examine the report to confirm that any vacant 

units rented during the past month were leased to Qualified Tenants. 

◊ If the vacancies listed on the previous report exceeded the number of QUs 

needed, monitoring staff should compare the number of vacancies listed on 

the current report to the number of QUs needed and confirm that a sufficient 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-8 9/20/01 
number of vacant units have been held available for Qualified Tenants. If the 

number of vacancies has fallen below the number of QUs needed, the owner 

has failed to follow proper leasing procedures. 

 If an owner did not lease vacant units as required, the property should be 

considered out of compliance, and the owner should be issued a Notice of NonCompliance (see Chapter 4). 

 Monitor the Total and VLI Set-Asides

 If an owner meets the occupancy target for LI-QUs (the Total Set-Aside 

minus the VLI Set-Aside ) before reaching the required number of VLI-QUs, 

vacant units held available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants may only be 

rented to VLI households. For example, if an owner with a Total Set-Aside of 35 

units and a VLI Set-Aside of 20 units has designated 15 LI-QUs, the owner has 

reached the target for LI-QUs and must rent reserved vacant units to VLI tenants 

until both Set-Asides are met. 

 When reviewing monthly compliance reports, monitoring staff should 

assess whether the number of designated LI-QUs meets the occupancy target 

for this type of QU. If no additional LI-QUs are needed monitoring staff should 

confirm that additional units held available for Qualified Tenants were rented only 

to VLI households. If an owner rents such a unit to a tenant who is not VLI 

(even to a LI household), the property is out of compliance. Monitoring staff 

should respond to the violation by issuing the owner a Notice of Non-Compliance 

(see Chapter 4). 

REMINDER: Make sure to compare tenant income to the 

correct income limit when reviewing tenant eligibility. While 

the income limits may have changed since the tenant was 

last certified, the income limits in effect at the time of 

certification or recertification are the ones used to assess 

compliance. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-9 9/20/01 
 Monitor QU Rents 

 To ensure that owners are charging acceptable rents for QUs, monitoring 

staff should check that the rent listed for each QU listed on the compliance report 

does not exceed the applicable rent limit for that unit. In reviewing unit rents, 

monitoring staff should determine that the rent is appropriate not only for the type 

of QU (VLI or LI), but also unit size (e.g., one bedroom vs. two bedroom). 

 If the rent charged for a QU exceeds the allowable amount, the owner is 

out of compliance and must repay the tenant the amount of the overcharge. 

Monitoring staff must respond to this violation by issuing the owner a Notice of 

Non-Compliance (see Chapter 4). 

 Review Income Documents for New Tenants

 Monitoring staff should review each compliance report to confirm that the 

owner has submitted copies of the TIC for each new QU and any recertifications 

completed during the reporting period. If the owner did not submit the required 

TICs, monitoring staff should notify the owner that the report is incomplete and 

request the missing documents. 

 When reviewing monthly reports, monitoring staff should examine each of 

the TICs received to make sure they were prepared properly and contain all the 

required information. If errors or omissions are discovered, the agency must 

notify the owner of the discrepancy and provide guidance on what the owner 

must do to correct the problem. 

 When errors in determining a tenant's annual income are encountered, 

monitoring staff should assess whether the mistake could affect a unit's 

designation as a QU. The owner is to be notified to correct or confirm this 

finding. Until resolution, this unit may be considered a QU. 

B. Pre-Compliance On-Site Review 

 Agencies are required to perform a Pre-Compliance on-site review of all 

properties whose LURA requires 10 or more QUs. This review should be 

performed within one year from the date the owner submits the written 

certification stating that the property is in compliance with the occupancy 

requirements of the LURA. 

GOOD PRACTICE: Agency staff should attempt to 

perform the review near the time an owner reports that the 

set-asides have been met. If an agency waits several 

months before conducting the review, minor mistakes may 

become compliance violations. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-10 9/20/01 
 If the Pre-Compliance period extends beyond the two-year time frame, 

the monitoring agency should perform an on-site review to ascertain the cause of 

the delay and to assure compliance with the LURA. 

 For developments with less than 10 QUs, the monitoring agency may 

perform an on-site review or may choose to perform a desk top review to assure 

owner compliance. Should the desk review be performed, the owner may be 

required to furnish the monitoring agency with copies of all requested supporting 

data necessary for this review. 

 During the on-site visit, monitoring staff should check the following items: 

◊ compliance reports submitted to the agency should match the unit listings

and tenant files kept at the site; 

◊ on-site tenant files should contain the required documentation; and 

◊ actual occupancy status of QUs should match project file documentation. 

If the results of the review show that the two Set-Asides have been met and the 

owner has complied with all AHP requirements, the property will then be 

considered to be in full compliance. 

Pre-Compliance Checklist

Steps Timing 

Reviewing Monthly Compliance Reports 

- vacant units held available for occupancy as QUs 

rented only to eligible tenants 

- a sufficient number of vacant units must be held 

available to meet the Set-Asides 

- rents for QUs must not exceed the applicable rent 

limits 

- proper TICs must be obtained for each QU 

Each month 

On-Site Visits 

- compare report to on-site unit listings

- check tenant files are accurate & complete 

- verify occupancy status of QUs 

Within 1 year of date 

that property reaches 

full compliance 

(properties with 10 or 

more QUs)

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-11 9/20/01 
 Compare Compliance Reports to On-Site Records

 When visiting the site, monitoring staff should compare the owner's most 

recent compliance report to the property's unit listing for the corresponding time 

period and confirm that the compliance report was accurately filled out. 

 If the status of one or more QUs has not been accurately reported, 

monitoring staff should gather the information necessary to accurately assess the 

status of the units in question and determine whether the property still contains 

the required number of QUs. 

 Review Tenant Files

 Agency monitors also should examine a sample of tenant files for the 

property's QUs to make sure that these files contain the required documents. In 

sampling tenant files, monitors should review at least 15 percent of the QU files, 

or a minimum of 15 files. 

 Each file should include: 

◊ a rental application; 

◊ a signed lease containing the language specified in the LURA; 

◊ signed release and consent forms from all household members with 

income; 

◊ a current TIC (initial certification or recertification); and 

◊ tenant income verification documents. 

Monitors should review the TICs and verifications in the files to make sure they 

have been prepared properly. If mistakes are found, monitoring staff should 

examine additional QU files to determine whether the problem is unique or 

representative of a systemic problem. 

 After checking the extent of the errors, the monitors should assess 

whether the errors could affect the eligibility of QUs. For example, did the 

owner make an error in calculating income from assets that will understate the 

annual income of tenants in QUs, or did the owner simply forget to have all the 

necessary members of the household sign a Release and Consent Form? If the 

error will not reduce the number of QUs, monitoring staff need only instruct the 

owner how to correct the problem. 

 If correcting the error could reduce the number of QUs, monitoring staff 

must inform the owner of the error, describe what needs to be done to correct the 

problem, and instruct the owner to review the files of all QUs and make the 

necessary corrections. If the corrections reduce the number of QUs, the owner 

will need to continue to follow the Pre-Compliance unit leasing procedures until 

the occupancy targets have been properly met. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-12 9/20/01 
 Verify Vacant QUs

 To ensure that owners have not misrepresented the occupancy status of 

the property's QUs, monitoring staff should select a sample of vacant QUs to visit 

in person. Monitoring staff should confirm that these units are not occupied by 

unreported tenants. 

3.5 ONGOING MONITORING 

 After a monitoring agency has determined that an owner has successfully 

reached the two set-asides specified in the LURA, the property is considered to be 

in full compliance and the agency begins the process of ongoing monitoring. 

 Agencies are expected to conduct a number of activities each year to 

monitor the continuing compliance of owners. These activities range from a desk 

top review of submitted compliance material to the performance of an on-site 

review. The agency is also expected to provide information and expertise, as 

needed, to facilitate compliance. In addition, each agency if responsible for the 

collection of its annual monitoring fees. 

 In reviewing a property's continuing compliance, monitoring agencies need 

to undertake the following activities: 

 Key On-Going Monitoring Activities

• Review annual compliance reports 

• Conduct periodic on-site visits 

 

 In addition to monitoring properties, the agency has several other duties 

that need to be performed in conjunction with their monitoring activities, including: 

a) distributing updated income limits and maximum rent levels; 

b) offering training and technical support; and 

c) invoicing the owner for the annual monitoring fee. 

These responsibilities are described in Section 3.6. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-13 9/20/01 
A. Reviewing Annual Compliance Reports 

 In reviewing the owner’s annual compliance report, staff should examine: 

◊ the total number of QUs; 

◊ the number of designated VLI units; 

◊ rents charged for QUs 

◊ tenant income documentation; and 

◊ the owner's certification. 

The review should be completed within 30 days of the date the report was 

received. 

 Monitor Total Number of QUs

 First, monitoring staff should confirm that the total number of QUs meets 

the Total Set-Aside established by the LURA. The Part A summary section of the 

compliance report shows the total number of QUs and the required number for the 

property. The figures reported by the owner should show that the total number of 

QUs (VLI and LI) is equal to the number required by the Total Set-Aside. The 

sample property shown below contains an adequate number of QUs to meet the 

Total Set-Aside . 

Set-Asides: Affordable Gardens East

Total Set-Aside = 35 QUs 

Occupied VLI-Qus 18 

Vacant VLI-QUs 0 

Over-Income VLI 2 

Occupied LI-QUs 10 

Vacant LI-QUs 5

TOTAL QUs 35 

Reminder: When a QU is vacated it continues to be counted as a QU 

until it is reoccupied for 31 days. If occupied by an eligible tenant, it may 

retain its QU status, otherwise it becomes an unrestricted unit. An OverIncome unit continues to be counted as a QU until it is replaced following 

NAU rules.

 Monitoring staff then should review the Unit Status Report form to confirm 

that the household income of the tenant in each QU falls within the appropriate 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-14 9/20/01 
income range for the reported household size. If a unit is a LI-QU and the 

tenant's income has been recertified, the household's annual income must fall 

within 140 percent of the LI limit applicable to that household size. 

 A unit designated as Over Income -- that is, a QU where the tenant's 

annual income now exceeds 140 percent of the LI limit -- continues to be 

counted in the QU total until the owner rents the next available vacant unit of 

comparable or smaller size to households with incomes above the LI limit. If an 

owner counts an Over-Income unit toward the Total Set-Aside, monitoring staff 

should determine the date the tenant of the Over-Income unit was recertified, and 

compare the effective lease dates for each unrestricted unit in the property to the 

recertification date of the Over-Income unit. If any unrestricted unit was rented 

after the date the Over-Income unit was recertified, the over-income unit can not 

continue to be counted toward the Total Set-Aside. 

 If monitoring staff determine that the total number of QUs (VLI and LI, 

including vacancies and Over-Income units) is less than the Total Set-Aside 

established for the property, then the agency should consider the property out of 

compliance. In such a case, the agency should issue a Notice of NonCompliance within 30 days of receiving the report. 

 Monitor the VLI Set-Aside

 After reviewing the total number of QUs, monitoring staff should assess 

whether the property continues to meet the VLI Set-Aside established by the 

LURA. The total number of VLI-QUs shown in the report summary should equal 

or exceed the required number for the property. The sample property below 

contains a sufficient number of VLI-QUs to meet its VLI Set-Aside . 

PROPERTY MEETS VLI SET-ASIDE 

Affordable Gardens West

VLI Set-Aside = 20 VLI-QUs 

Occupied VLI-QUs 15 

Vacant VLI-QUs 5

TOTAL VLI-QUs 20 

 If the property contains a sufficient number of QUs, but the number of VLIQUs is less than the VLI Set-Aside, the property may not be out of compliance if 

the extra LI units were the result of tenant income changes. However, the owner 

must rent the next available QU to a VLI tenant until the VLI Set-Aside is met. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-15 9/20/01 
For example, if the number of VLI-QUs in Affordable Gardens West dropped to 18 

because two VLI tenants became LI on recertification, the owner would need to 

rent LI-QUs that became available to a VLI tenant until the property reached 20 

VLI-QUs. 

 If a property has a sufficient number of QUs but an insufficient number of 

VLI-QUs, the agency should inform the owner that vacated QUs must be rented to 

VLI tenants until the VLI Set-Aside is met. The agency should notify the owner 

within 30 days of receiving the report. 

REMINDER: Make sure to compare tenant income to the 

correct income limit when reviewing tenant eligibility. 

While the income limits may have changed since the 

tenant was last certified, the income limits in effect at the 

time of certification/recertification are the ones used to 

assess compliance. 

 Review QU Rents

 To ensure that owners are charging acceptable rents for QUs, monitoring 

staff must check that the rent listed for each QU does not exceed the maximum 

rent allowable for that size and type of unit. 

 If the rent charged for a QU exceeds the allowable amount, the property is 

out of compliance and the owner must return the amount overpaid to the tenant. 

Monitoring staff should respond to this violation by issuing the owner a Notice of 

Non-Compliance (see Chapter 4) within 30 days of receiving the report. 

 Review Tenant Income Documentation

 Monitoring staff should review the Date of Recertification column to confirm 

that tenants in QUs have been re-examined within the past year. If a tenant living 

in a QU has not been recertified within the past 12 months, it is recommended that 

the agency notify the owner within 14 days after receiving the report. The notice 

should inform the owner that overdue recertifications must be submitted to the 

monitoring agency within 30 days or the units will no longer count as QUs and the 

agency may find the property to be out of compliance with the LURA. 

 Monitoring staff should also examine the tenant income documentation 

(TICs for initial occupancy and recertification) submitted with the compliance 

report to confirm that the owner provided copies for each tenant occupying a QU. 

If the owner did not submit documentation for all occupied QUs, the monitoring 

agency should notify the owner that the report was incomplete and request the 

missing items. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-16 9/20/01 
 Staff should then review each TIC to make sure they were properly 

prepared and contain the required signatures. If errors or omissions are 

discovered, the agency must notify the owner of the discrepancy within 30 days of 

receiving the report and provide guidance on what the owner must do to correct 

the problem. 

 When monitoring staff encounter errors in determining a tenant's annual 

income, they should assess whether the mistake could affect a unit's designation 

as a QU. If the unit's designation is in question, monitoring staff should ask the 

owner to correct or confirm this finding. Until resolution, this unit may be 

considered a QU. 

 Review Owner's Annual Certification

 Owners are required to submit written statements with their annual 

compliance reports certifying that the property complies with the provisions of their 

LURA. In reviewing the annual compliance report, monitoring staff should confirm 

that the owner has submitted a properly completed certification. The owner must 

use the certification form included in Appendix I of this manual. This form must 

be dated and signed by the owner or a representative with full authority to legally 

bind the ownership entity. 

B. Periodic On-Site Reviews 

 Under the MOU, agencies have committed to visit each property with 10 or 

more QUs at least once every three years, or more frequently as warranted. In 

determining how frequently to visit a specific property, the agency should consider 

the following factors: 

◊ high vacancy rate 

◊ slow unit absorption 

◊ repeated requests for exceptions 

◊ delays in submission of reports 

◊ errors in submission of reports 

◊ requests from owner for assistance 

◊ changes in management staff 

◊ changes in ownership 

Monitoring staff should contact the owner to schedule the visit and allow the owner 

sufficient time to plan to attend the visit and make sure the necessary staff are 

present. 

 During the on-site visit, monitoring staff should check the following items for 

compliance: 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-17 9/20/01 
◊ compliance reports submitted to the agency should match the unit listings

and tenant files kept at the site; 

◊ on-site tenant files should contain the required documentation; and 

◊ actual occupancy status of QUs should match the documentation in the 

project's files. 

If the results of the review show that the Set-Asides continue to be met and the 

owner has complied with all AHP requirements, the property is considered to be in 

compliance. 

On-Going Compliance Checklist 

Steps Timing

Review Annual Compliance Reports 

 _ number of QUs meets Total Set-Aside 

 _ number of VLI-QUs meets VLI Set-Aside 

 _ rents for QUs do not exceed applicable rent limits 

 _ proper tenant income documents kept for each QU 

At end of monitoring year 

On-Site Visits 

 _ compare compliance report to on-site records 

 _ check that tenant files are accurate and complete 

 _ verify occupancy status of QUs 

At least once every three 

years for properties with 10 

or more QUs 

 Compare Compliance Reports to On-Site Records

 When visiting the site, monitoring staff should compare the last compliance 

report from the owner to the property's unit listing for the corresponding time 

period to confirm that the compliance report was accurately filled out. If the 

status of one or more QUs has not been accurately reported, monitoring staff 

should gather the information necessary to accurately assess the status of the 

units in question and determine whether the property still meets the occupancy 

targets. 

 Review Tenant Files

Agency monitors should examine a sample of tenant files for the property's QUs to 

make sure the files contain the required documents. In sampling tenant files, 

monitors should examine at least 15 percent of the QU files, or a minimum of 15 

files. 

 Each file should include: 

◊ a rental application; 

◊ a signed lease containing the language specified in the LURA; 

◊ signed release and consent forms from the household members with 

income; 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-18 9/20/01 
◊ a current TIC (initial certification or recertification); and 

◊ tenant income verification documents. 

Monitors should review the TICs and verification documents in the files to make 

sure they have been prepared properly. If monitoring staff find mistakes, they 

have the discretion to review more QU files determine whether the problem is 

limited to a few files or if a large number will be affected. 

 After checking the extent of the errors, the monitors should assess whether 

the errors could affect the eligibility of QUs. (For example, did the owner make an 

error in calculating income from assets that will understate the annual income of 

tenants in QUs, or did the owner simply forget to have all the necessary members 

of the household sign a release and consent form?) 

◊ If correcting the error will not reduce the number of QUs, monitoring staff need 

only instruct the owner how to correct the problem. 

◊ If correcting the error will reduce the number of QUs, inform the owner of the 

error, describe what needs to be done to correct the problem, and instruct the 

owner to review the files of all QUs and make the necessary corrections. 

◊ If the corrections reduce the number of QUs for an owner just certifying full 

compliance, the owner will need to continue to follow the pre-compliance unit 

leasing procedures until the occupancy targets have been properly met. 

◊ If errors in documenting tenant income reduce the number of eligible QUs, 

monitoring staff should reassess whether the property contains a sufficient 

number of QUs. If the number of eligible QUs is less than the Total Set-Aside 

established for the property, then the property is out of compliance. In such a 

case, the agency should respond to the violation by issuing the owner a Notice 

of Non-Compliance within 30 days of conducting the review. 

 Verify Vacant QUs

 To ensure that owners have not misrepresented the occupancy status of 

the property's QUs, monitoring staff should select a sample of vacant QUs to visit 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-19 9/20/01 
 in person. Monitoring staff should confirm that these units are not occupied by 

unreported tenants. 

 Examine Physical Conditions of Property 

 AHP does not establish a specific set of property standards that owners 

must meet. Owners are expected to comply with local housing codes. While 

agencies are not required to monitor owner compliance with these local codes, if 

an agency discovers that an owner is not adequately maintaining the physical 

condition of a property, agency staff should ask the owner to make corrections or 

inform the local housing inspector of any identified code violations. 

 Moreover, monitoring agencies may deny QU status to a unit that is not 

habitable. A unit must be physically available for occupancy before an owner can 

count that unit as a QU or as a unit held available for an eligible tenant. If an 

agency discovers that an owner failed to maintain a unit in habitable condition 

according to local housing codes, agency staff should not allow that unit to be 

counted as a QU because it is not properly available for occupancy. 

3.6 MONITORING PROPERTY RESALE 

 In the event a property is resold, the provisions of the LURA continue to 

apply until the term of the agreement expires. In signing the LURA, the owner 

assumes responsibility for taking all necessary actions to establish, preserve, and 

protect the ability of the monitoring agency and FDIC to enforce the provisions of 

the agreement when all or a portion of the property is resold. Future buyers of 

AHP properties are bound by the provisions of the LURA for the term of the 

agreement, even if the new owners do not acknowledge or execute the LURA at 

the time of resale. 

 Owners are expected to notify the monitoring agency of any resale of the 

property at least 30 days prior to closing the sale, providing the name, address, 

and telephone number of the prospective buyer. 

 After receiving notice of a resale, it is recommended that the agency 

confirm that the purchaser has been informed of the LURA and its provisions. 

Monitoring agencies should provide copies of program compliance materials and a 

schedule of upcoming compliance training sessions to potential buyers. 

 Once a new owner takes possession of an AHP property, the agency may, 

at its discretion, require monthly compliance reports for a period of up to six 

months after the sale to allow the agency to more closely track the new owner's 

performance in complying with the provisions of the LURA. 

 If an owner fails to notify a monitoring agency of a property's resale prior 

to final closing, the agency may turn the case over to FDIC if it is unable to locate 

and establish proper contact with the new owner. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-20 9/20/01 
3.7 OTHER AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES 

A. Distributing Income Limits and Maximum Rents 

 Monitoring agencies are responsible for providing owners with the income 

limits and maximum rents that apply to their properties. As discussed in Chapter 

2, the AHP and income limits are the same as the HUD published annual (gross) 

income limits for low- and very low-income families and individuals under the 

Section 8 program. 

 The income limits and maximum rents will change each year as HUD 

changes its determination of area median incomes. Each year, FDIC will send all 

agencies the updated income limits from HUD within 30 days of the date they are 

released. Monitoring agencies should promptly distribute copies of the updated 

income limits and maximum rents applicable to each property. 

 The maximum rents for VLI-QUs and LI-QUs are prescribed by the LURA. 

There are three key components in establishing the rent limits for QUs: 

◊ Anticipated household size per unit 

◊ Income limits ( 50 percent of median as adjusted for family size and 65 

percent of median as adjusted for family size) 

◊ Income adjustments for allowances based on bedroom size 

As discussed in Chapter 2, Appendix B includes a description of how maximum 

rents are calculated by HUD and FDIC, based on income limits. The monitoring 

agency has no responsibility for doing any further calculations. 

B. Providing Training and Technical Support 

 While the Owner's Compliance Manual provides thorough guidance on the 

program's requirements and procedures, FDIC encourages monitoring agencies to 

offer some form of compliance training for owners and their property management 

staff. In-person training sessions will help assure that owners and their 

management staff develop an adequate understanding of the program's key 

concepts and practices. 

 To assist with training, the FDIC has prepared and distributed to the 

monitoring agency an AHP Compliance Video for introducing owners and 

managers to the Program, and a detailed curriculum for a one-day training of 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-21 9/20/01 
 owners and managers, complete with Instructor’s Guide, overhead 

transparencies, practice activities, and handouts. 

 In addition, monitoring staff are encouraged to meet with owners either 

individually or in groups to discuss: 

◊ Key program requirements 

◊ Selecting tenants for QUs 

◊ Setting rents for QUs 

◊ Pre-Compliance occupancy procedures 

◊ Ongoing occupancy procedures 

◊ Reporting requirements 

◊ Annual monitoring fee 

Monitoring staff also should be available to answer questions or provide guidance 

regarding program procedures to owners and management staff. FDIC expects 

agencies will be able to provide most of this technical support by telephone. 

C. Collecting the Annual Monitoring Fee 

 Monitoring agencies are responsible for collecting the annual monitoring 

fee from owners after the first year. To collect the monitoring fee, agencies 

should send each owner an invoice indicating the amount due for the coming year 

within a reasonable period (at least 30 days is recommended) before the start of 

the next monitoring year (see Exhibit 3-3 Ongoing Monitoring). As discussed in 

Section 2.7 of this Manual, the standard monitoring year begins on theanniversary 

date of the LURA, but agencies may establish a different starting date for the 

monitoring year if they give owners adequate notice and prorate the monitoring fee 

where necessary. 

 Each year, monitoring agencies may increase the monitoring fee to cover 

increased costs due to inflation. Agencies must use the formula presented in 

Section 2.7.B of this Manual when adjusting the annual fee. The result provides a 

revised base fee which must be multiplied by the number of QUs required by the 

LURA to obtain the updated annual fee for a specific property. 

 Annual Fee = Revised Base Fee x No. of Required QUs 

3.8 EXECUTING A RELEASE FROM LURA REQUIREMENTS 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-22 9/20/01 
Under certain conditions, the term of the LURA may expire before the 

standard period of 40 (or 50) years. Section 1.1(o) of the AHP Multifamily LURA 

defines the "Term" of the LURA and provides for these conditions.12

 Upon request from the property owner, monitoring agencies may 

recommend a release from the LURA when one of the conditions discussed 

below is documented. The release should set forth the particular condition 

giving rise to the end of the term. 

 An FDIC-approved release form and instructions are included in Appendix 

K. If this form conflicts with local law or practice, monitoring agencies may 

choose another format that is more appropriate. 

A. Foreclosure

The term of the LURA expires when there is a loss of the property due to 

foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. However, the LURA also 

establishes that the lower income occupancy requirements are revived if one of 

the owners or a related entity who held an interest in the property at the time of 

foreclosure, or immediately prior to foreclosure, reacquires an ownership interest 

in the property at anytime thereafter. If an agency has cause to believe that an 

owner or a related entity attempted to avoid the LURA's lower income 

requirements through foreclosure and again holds an interest in the property, the 

agency is encouraged to take the appropriate steps to activate the LURA's 

requirements. 

 The revival provision is intended to prevent an owner from escaping the 

LURA's occupancy requirements while retaining the effective control and use of 

the property. This provision should not be applied when a bona fide foreclosure 

has occurred and an owner later reacquires an interest on a reasonable 

commercial basis. 

B. Other Factors Causing the Term of the LURA to Expire

The LURA identifies several other conditions that will cause its early 

termination. They include: 

◊ involuntary loss of the property due to seizure or condemnation; 

◊ total involuntary loss as a result of fire or other casualty; and 

◊ obsolescence of the property, making it unusable for housing, with no 

financially feasible option for rehabilitation. 

 

 Before the FDIC will consider a release of a LURA for obsolescence the 

following procedures must be followed by: 

 

 12 Note: The "Term" is defined in Section 1.1(q) of the AHP Condominium Bulk Sale LURA and will be found in 

slightly different locations in other types of LURAs.

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-23 9/20/01 
The Owner will: 

i) Provide to the monitoring agency a sworn certification 

indicating the following: 

• That written notice indicating that the owner has 

requested a release of the LURA has been 

disseminated via first class mail or hand delivered to all 

tenants at the property and to any known tenant 

organization for the property. 

• That notice has been posted in the complex’s management office and by each set of tenant 

mailboxes . 

ii) That the notice posted contained the following 

information: 

• Name, address and telephone of the owner, or the owner's designated representative and 

the name, address and telephone number of a contact person at the monitoring agency. 

• That the owner has requested the release of the LURA. 

• An explanation indicating that the release is requested because of obsolescence suffered by 

the property making it unusable for housing and that it is not financially feasible to make the 

necessary repairs that would eliminate the obsolescence for all or a portion of the property. 

In addition, a statement that the release of the LURA would result in the demolition of the 

property and therefore, the loss of the rent restricted units at the property. 

• An estimate of the new rent schedules in the event that it is anticipated that a new 

apartment complex will be built to replace the existing one. 

• An explanation that the release of the LURA would result in the loss of all lower income and 

very low income units. 

• A statement that interested parties have 60 days from the date of the notice to provide the 

monitoring agency with written comments and information on the request. 

• A statement informing the tenants of their right to review and copy the documents presented 

for the release of the LURA and the address where these documents can be reviewed and 

copied. 

iii) At their expense and through independent licensed 

professional(s) the owner will conduct an inspection 

of the property and a feasibility analysis of the 

repairs. The independent licensed professional(s) 

must be approved by the monitoring agency. Both 

reports must be in writing. The inspection report 

must address the physical condition of the property 

and the feasibility analysis must address the cost of 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-24 9/20/01 
the repairs or modifications required to cure the 

obsolescence. 

iv) Submit to the monitoring agency a written formal request 

for release of the LURA. All documentation 

regarding the LURA release, including the 

inspection report and feasibility analysis must be 

submitted with the formal request. 

v) Make available to tenants all documentation and 

information submitted by the owner or its 

representative to the monitoring agency for review 

and copying (at tenant’s expense) during normal 

business hours at the on-site management office. 

The Monitoring Agency will: 

i) Provide a 60-day waiting period from the date of the 

receipt of the notice for written comments and 

information regarding the request prior to making a 

final recommendation to the FDIC. 

ii) Maintain a written record of all comments received. 

iii) Review and consider written comments, including those 

received from tenants or their representatives, in 

the determination of its recommendation to the 

FDIC. 

iv) Forward the inspection report, feasibility analysis and the 

final recommendation to the FDIC, with all written 

comments and other documentation received. 

The FDIC before making its final determination will: 

i) Review and consider all the documentation and all 

written comments received either through the 

monitoring agency or directly at the FDIC. 

Lower-Income Families and Very Low-Income Families, who are renting a unit at 

the property at the time that the owner requests a release of the LURA are third 

party beneficiaries of the foregoing rights and procedures. They shall be entitled 

to apply to any court having jurisdiction of the subject matter for specific 

performance of said rights and procedures, for an injunction, damages, attorney's 

fees, and any other relief as may by appropriate. Former tenants whose leases 

were terminated or not renewed by the owner in anticipation of submitting a 

request for release may also enforce these rights. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-25 9/20/01 
If a monitoring agency is satisfied that one of these conditions is present 

(foreclosure, condemnation, fire or other casualty or obsolescence), the FDIC 

may consider releasing the property from the LURA. 

AHP Compliance Monitoring Manual 3-26 9/20/01