alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2635

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide increased contracting

opportunities for private firms by encouraging agencies of the Federal

Government to enter into contracts for commercial activities performed

for State and local government, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1993

Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming (for himself, Mr. BOEHNER, and Mr. SCHIFF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide increased

contracting opportunities for private firms by encouraging agencies of the Federal Government to enter into

contracts for commercial activities performed for State

and local government, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Competition Act

5 of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2635 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND POLICY.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds and declares the

3 following:

4 (1) Federal, State, and local government agen5 cies have a significant need for services that can be

6 provided by private enterprise.

7 (2) The Federal Government, and State and

8 local government agencies using Federal funds, have

9 built significant capabilities that duplicate or are

10 competitive with private firms.

11 (3) There is significant capacity within the pri12 vate sector, including many small businesses, that

13 has long been under utilized by Federal, State, and

14 local governments and is capable of providing serv15 ices to government agencies.

16 (4) The Federal Government should not com17 pete with the private sector when providing services

18 to State and local governments.

19 (5) Expanded use of private firms can increase

20 competition and lower the costs of government agen21 cies.

22 (b) POLICY.—It is the policy of the Federal Govern23 ment to rely to the maximum extent possible on private

24 sector sources to provide property and services needed by

25 the Federal Government.
3

•HR 2635 IH

1 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT RELATING TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL

2 RELATIONS.

3 Section 6505(a) of title 31, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and

6 (2) by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(2) An executive agency may not provide commercial

8 activities (as defined in Office of Management and Budget

9 Circular A–76, as in effect on the date of the enactment

10 of the Fair Competition Act of 1993) to a State or local

11 government, unless a public notification and search of po12 tential private sector providers by the executive agency de13 termines that an activity is of such a unique nature that

14 no private sector provider can perform such services.’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darnell Edward KEYE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-13805

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 18, 2011.

Terry Flynn, Thomas F. Kirwin, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Gregory Patrick McMahon, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Gainesville, FL, Pamela A. Moine, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Darren James Johnson, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Gainesville, FL, Chet Kaufman, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Darnell Edward Keye, Jesup, GA, pro se.

Before WILSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Darnell Edward Keye, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw, and AFFIRM the revocation of Keye’s supervised release and the sentence imposed by the district court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERNEST WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 58 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Jaswinder Singh GILL, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70134.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 19, 2011.

Tsz-Hai Huang, Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jaswinder Singh Gill, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Gill’s asylum application was untimely because that finding is based on disputed facts. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); *cf. Ramadan v. Gonzales,*479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir.2007) (per cu-riam) (exercising jurisdiction to consider one-year bar where facts were undisputed). Accordingly, we dismiss Gill’s asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination based upon the inconsistencies in Gill’s testimony regarding his role and participation in political activities, *see Li v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 959, 962-63 (9th Cir.2004), and Gill’s failure to provide reasonable explanations for the inconsistencies, *see Rivera v. Mukasey,*508 F.3d 1271, 1275 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, in the absence of credible testimony, Gill’s withholding of removal claim fails. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because Gill’s CAT claim is based on the same evidence the agency found not credible, and he points to no other evidence showing it is more likely than not he would *57be tortured if he returns to India, Gill’s CAT claim fails. *See id.*at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dark Dynamite Inc (the
      "Company") for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Lei, Ming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:




|v | the
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|v | information
              contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
              the
              financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/
      Lei, Ming


Lei,
      Ming


Director,
      President and Chief Executive Officer





August
      19, 2006







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principals;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financing reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involved management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.Dated: March 26, 2010
    By:
    /s/ T. Michael AnsleyT. Michael Ansley
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*October 9, 2009*

[Cite as *10/09/2009 Case Announcements,*2009-Ohio-5367.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2009-1810.

#### Torrance v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon review of relator’s proffered affidavit of indigency, submitted to waive the filing fee and security deposit,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that within ten days of the date of this order relator either submits the $40 filing fee and $100 security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV or show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action, or any future actions, without payment of the filing fee and security deposit
Exhibit 99.4





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Ironwood Gold Corp. (formerly Suraj Ventures, Inc.) (the “Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert J. Reukl, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

















ROBERT J. REUKL


Robert
J. Reukl


President, Chief Financial Officer


Secretary
and Director








-1-
Call Report amendments & the Statute of Limitations

Section 7(g) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. § 1817(g)(2)), provides that any 

action brought either by an insured depository institution, or by the FDIC, to recover the 

overpaid or underpaid amount of any assessment shall be brought within three years after the 

date the assessment payment was due. Thus, for example, to change a bank’s deposit 

insurance assessment for the first assessment period of 2010, amendments to its March 31, 

2010 Call Report would have to be submitted on or before June 30, 2013 (that is, within three 

years of the payment due date, June 30, 2010). 

However, any insured depository institution is free to amend Call Reports for periods outside 

the statutory limit for the sake of having correct figures on file. But, in order for the 

Corporation to bill for an underpayment, or for any institution to receive a refund of 

overpayment, Call Report amendments must be made within the three-year statute of 

limitations period.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1914 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1914

   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the 
   influence of multicandidate political committees in elections for 
                            Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1993

   Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Grams, Mr. 
Hoekstra, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Horn, Mr. Huffington, Mr. Lazio, Mr. Shays, Mr. 
 Sensenbrenner, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. McCrery, Mr. Torkildsen, 
 and Mr. Walker) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to reduce the 
   influence of multicandidate political committees in elections for 
                            Federal office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PAC Limitation Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN CEILING ON MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEE 
              CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL 
              OFFICE.

    Section 315(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 
(2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)(A)) is amended by striking out ``$5,000'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``$1,000''.

SEC. 3. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS 
              FROM MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in, or Delegate 
or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress may not, with respect to a 
reporting period for an election, accept contributions from 
multicandidate political committees totaling in excess of the total of 
contributions accepted from individual residents of the congressional 
district involved.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Juana Flores CASTANEDA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74981.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*617Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

Kevin A. Bove, Esq., Escondido, CA, for Petitioner.

CAS-Distriet Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Lyle D. Jentzer, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s opposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner’s contention that the “stop-time” rule of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(1) is inapplicable to her case lacks merit. *See Garcia-Ramirez v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 935, 937 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (stating that accrual of physical presence time ends when removal proceedings are commenced through service of a notice to appear); *Lagandaon v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 983, 989 (9th Cir.2004) (‘We conclude that the period of continuous presence ends on the day the Notice is served.”). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Regina QUARTEY, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-1244.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 28, 2011.

Decided: Feb. 9, 2011.

Taiwo A. Agbaje, Agbaje Law Firm, PC, Gwynn Oak, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Susan K. Houser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Linda Y. Cheng, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Regina Quartey, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and the parties’ briefs and conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review Quarters challenges to the immigration judge’s determination that Quartey was ineligible for adjustment of status due to her fraudulent marriage, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2006), and that the denial of Quarters motion to reopen was not an abuse of discretion, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3). *625We therefore deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Chairman's Schedule

December 2019

Monday, December 2, 2019

9:30 AM Meeting w/staff

1:30 PM Meeting w/staff

2:30 PM Meeting w/prospective employee

3:30 PM Meeting w/staff

5:30 PM Welcome Dinner for the Minority 

Depository Institutions Subcommittee of the 

Community Banking Advisory Committee 

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

9:00 AM Meeting w/staff

12:00 PM Speaker at the Women in Housing and 

Finance (WHF) Public Policy Luncheon

2:00 PM Meeting w/staff

4:00 PM Meeting w/staff 

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

10:00 AM House Committee on Financial Services 

Hearing

2:00 PM Meeting w/Steven Mnuchin, Secretary of the 

Treasury

3:30 PM Financial Stability Oversight Council 

Meeting (FSOC) 

5:00 PM FSOC Reception

Thursday, December 5, 2019

10:00 AM Senate Committee on Banking, Housing & 

Urban Affairs Hearing
3:45 PM Fireside Chat at Virginia Bankers 

Association (VBA) Conference with Kristen 

Reid, Manager, Education and Training, 

VBA

Friday, December 6, 2019

 9:30 AM Conference Call with Vladimir Saric,

Chairman of the Board of Directors, Deposit 

Insurance Agency, Republic of Serbia

10:00 AM Meeting w/staff

10:30 AM Meeting w/staff

11:00 AM Call w/Djerdj Matković, Serebian 

Ambassador

12:00 PM Lunch w/Jared Sawyer, Principal, 

Rich Feuer Anderson

 1:30 PM Call w/Lael Brainard, Governor, 

Federal Reserve Board (FRB)

2:00 PM Meeting w/staff

Monday, December 9, 2019

11:30 AM Interview, Andrew Ackerman, Wall Street 

Journal and Joseph Otting, Comptroller of 

the Currency, Office of the Comptroller of 

the Currency (OCC)

12:00 PM Lunch w/Joseph Otting, Comptroller of 

Currency, OCC and Randy Quarles, Vice 

Chairman, FRB

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

11:00 AM Lunch/Reception with Senator Olympia 

Snowe, Olympia Snowe Women’s 

Leadership Institute

 1:00 PM Speaker at the Olympia Snowe Women’s

Leadership Institute 5th Annual Leadership 

Luncheon

Wednesday, December 11 2019

10:00 AM Speaker at the Brokered Deposits in the

Fintech Age event, Brookings Institution
12:30 PM Lunch w/Alex Sanchez, President and CEO, 

Florida Bankers Association

 

2:00 PM Meeting w/Ambassador Andrew Young and 

John Hope Bryant, Founder, Chairman, & 

CEO, Operation HOPE

3:00 PM The Color of Money Documentary

Screening w/Ambassador Andrew Young 

and John Hope Bryant, Founder, Chairman 

& CEO, Operation HOPE

Thursday, December 12, 2019

9:30 AM Meeting w/staff 

11:30 AM Meeting w/staff 

2:00 PM Board of Director’s Meeting

4:30 PM Call w/Mitch McConnell, Senate 

Majority Leader

Friday, December 13, 2019

9:00 AM Meeting w/staff

10:30 AM Meeting w/staff 

11:30 AM Meeting w/staff 

Monday, December 16, 2019

Official Travel to Belgrade, Serbia for Serbia Deposit Insurance Agency 30th Anniversary 

Monday, December 16 – 19, 2019

Monday, December 23, 2019

10:00 AM Call w/Gregory Meeks, Congressman, 

U.S. House of Representatives

2:00 PM Meeting w/staff
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lottery & Wagering Solutions Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dallas R. Dempster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Dallas R. Dempster
                                                 -------------------------
                                                 Dallas R. Dempster
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 November 7, 2003