alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.01





Certification





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-QSB”)
      of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
      10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2008





By:
            /s/
                Bernard AlbaneseBernard
                AlbaneseChairman
                of the Board and
              Chief
                Executive Officer and acting Chief
              Financial
                Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,473,084
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,292,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (70,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    4,364,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,350,663
<PP&E>                                         644,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (245,107)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,801,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,736,556
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,733
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,624,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,801,979
<SALES>                                        3,594,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,594,049
<CGS>                                          1,905,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,233,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             48,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                288,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                   103,652<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,972<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,972<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .14<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .14<F1>


<FN>
<F1>- Proforma as if the Company had been taxed as a C-Corporation during the 
     period.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 285 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 285

To ensure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts Ditch headgate 
  and ditch segment within the Holy Cross Wilderness in Eagle County, 
                   Colorado, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2017

Mr. Gardner (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts Ditch headgate 
  and ditch segment within the Holy Cross Wilderness in Eagle County, 
                   Colorado, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bolts Ditch Access and Use Act''.

SEC. 2. BOLTS DITCH ACCESS.

    (a) Access Granted.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall permit by 
special use authorization nonmotorized access and use, in accordance 
with section 293.6 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, of the 
Bolts Ditch Headgate and the Bolts Ditch within the Holy Cross 
Wilderness, Colorado, as designated by Public Law 96-560, for the 
purposes of the diversion of water and use, maintenance, and repair of 
such ditch and headgate by the Town of Minturn, Colorado, a Colorado 
Home Rule Municipality.
    (b) Location of Facilities.--The Bolts Ditch headgate and ditch 
segment referenced in subsection (a) are as generally depicted on the 
map entitled ``Bolts Ditch headgate and Ditch Segment'', dated 
November, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31(a)
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Kevin L. BarnettKevin L. BarnettPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD07-01-011] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the Stickney Point Drawbridge (SR 72) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 68.6, Sarasota, Sarasota County, Florida. This deviation allows the drawbridge owner or operator to only open a single leaf from February 26, 2001 to February 28, 2001 from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m., daily. This temporary deviation is requred to allow the bridge owner to safely complete maintenance to the drawbridge. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective from February 26, 2001 to February 28, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-6743. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Stickney Point Drawbridge (SR 72) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sarasota, FL is a double leaf bridge with a vertical clearance of 18 feet above mean high water (MHW) measured at the center in the closed position. On January 24, 2001 the owner requested a deviation from the current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.35 which requires the drawbridge to open promptly and fully when a request to open is given. This temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary maintenance to the drawbridge in a critical time sensitive manner. 

The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.35 for the purpose of maintenance of the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Stickney Point Drawbridge (SR 72) need only open one leaf from February 26, 2001 to February 28, 2001 from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m., daily. 

Dated: February 13, 2001. 

G. E. Shapley, 

Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 01-4329 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
2009-1667.

#### State ex rel. Hall v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate Dist.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31

                                                           [LOGO] IndymacBank(R)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Blair Abernathy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
      Form 10-K of IndyMac INDA Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-AR2 (the "Exchange Act
      periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
      whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
      information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
      by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
      this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
      the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance-with servicing criteria for
      asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
      assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
      1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
      included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
      this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
      reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company and Newport Management Corporation.

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Blair Abernathy
-----------------------
Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)
#### Central of Georgia Railway Company *v.*Hurst.

Argued June 10,

Decided July 20, 1901.

Action for damages. Before Judge Henry. Burke superior court. July 30, 1900.

*Seaborn H.*Jones, for plaintiff in error.

*Johnston & Fullbright,*contra.

Little, J.

1. Giving full effect to the contract between the parties, the railroad company could only be made liable in the event an injury was occasioned to the animals-shipped, or any of them, caused by the negligence of the railroad company. While the evidence apparently preponderated against the fact of negligence, one witness testified to facts from which negligence might by the jury be found to have existed; and as the verdict has been approved by the trial judge, it can not be said that it was without evidence to support it.

2. There was no material error of law committed, of which complaint was made.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concurring.*
#### Michael Upton KERSHAW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mike EVANS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 09-17384.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 25, 2011.

*997Michael Upton Kershaw, Jamestown, CA, pro se.

Paul O’Connor, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for RespondentAppellee.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Michael Upton Kershaw appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Kershaw contends that his counsel was ineffective for failing to accurately advise him regarding his potential sentence if he rejected the state’s plea offer and proceeded to trial.

The state court, after conducting an evidentiary hearing, found that Kershaw failed to show either deficient performance or prejudice regarding this claim. This decision was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 690-93, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).

The state court also found that Kershaw was aware of his potential sentencing exposure under California Penal Code § 667.71. Kershaw failed to present “clear and convincing evidence” overcoming the presumption of correctness of this *998finding. Accordingly, the state court’s decision was not based on an “unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding.” *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2), (e)(1).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| **Revenue Recognition Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract]**                                                                         |           |           |
| Revenue, Initial Application Period Cumulative Effect Transition, Explanation of Change                                    | $ 2.9          | $ 8.2          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Represents the quantification of the effect of adopting the new accounting standard or change in accounting principle expected by the entity to have a significant effect on the entity's financial statements.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NewAccountingPronouncementOrChangeInAccountingPrincipleEffectOfAdoptionQuantification**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_RevenueFromContractWithCustomerAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
2009-1669.

#### Bailey v. Cleves.

Hamilton App. No. C-081099.
#### Richard R. Lee, Petitioner-Appellee, v.Robert O. LAMPERT, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 09-35276.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2011.

Stephen R. Sady, FPDOR — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Carolyn Alexander, Esquire, As*1177sistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR — Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellant.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 23, 2001, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Saba, Redwood Shores, CA; and Fretwell Downing 
Informatics Limited, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom have been added 
as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 
55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 23, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 20, 2000 (65 FR 69789).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-5065 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT
      32.1




SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Rim Semiconductor Company (the “Company”), does hereby certify that
      to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended April 30,
      2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





This
      certification is made solely for the purposes of U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
      for any other purpose.





June
      12,
      2007





/S/ BRAD
                KETCHBRAD
                KETCH
              PRESIDENT
                AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING
                OFFICER)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2782

To transfer the Veterans’ Employment and Training Service from the

Department of Labor to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY (by request) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To transfer the Veterans’ Employment and Training Service

from the Department of Labor to the Department of

Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Veterans’ Employment and Training Service, to4 gether with all functions, duties, and responsibilities relat5 ing thereto, is hereby transferred from the Department

6 of Labor to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Æ