alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2850 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 416
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2850

 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2018

 Mr. Flake (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
                     which was read the first time

                              May 16, 2018

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN WMAT SETTLEMENT FUND FOR WMAT RURAL WATER 
              SYSTEM.

    (a) Authorization of WMAT Rural Water System.--Section 307(a) of 
the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 
(Public Law 111-291; 124 Stat. 3080) is amended in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1) by inserting ``, (b)(2),'' after ``subsections (a)''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 312(b)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the White Mountain 
Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-
291; 124 Stat. 3093) is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting the following: ``, including the planning, design, and 
construction of the WMAT rural water system, in accordance with section 
307(a).''.
                                                       Calendar No. 416

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2850

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 16, 2018

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report), I, Joseph K. Jachinowski, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                
|----------------
|February 5, 2003
|
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                   2004 COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THOMAS SPARRVIK

The main focus this year is to grow the company and continue on the path of
profitability. The main challenge will be to continue to motivate the staff
while located in San Diego. This reward system intends to motivate you to
fulfill both the Company tasks and, in the long term, create shareholder value
for all shareholders of KMC.

The existing contract between us will remain in effect as a base contract;
however, your monthly base salary will be $3,000/month effective 01/01/04, and
you will not be part of the KMC benefit plans:

A 'per quarter' bonus will be paid to you, based on the following quarterly
Operating Profit:

         - If less than $100K, then $0/Qtr.

         - If more than $100K, but less than $150K, then $2,500/Qtr.

         - If more than $150K, but less than $400K, then $5,000/Qtr.

         - If more than $400K, but less than $600K, then $7,500/Qtr.

         - If more than $600K, then $10,000/Qtr.

A 'year end' bonus of $20,000 will be paid to you if the 2004 Annual Operating
Profit for KMC exceeds $1.1 million.

A 'year end' bonus will be paid to you based on the following 2004 Annual
Revenue results:

         -        If at least $12 million, then $5,000.

         -        If between $12 million and $13 million, then an additional
                  $10,000, prorated.

         -        If $13 million or more, then $15,000.

Before the bonuses are paid, financial results must be received and approved by
the Compensation Committee Chairman.

No Q3 or Q4 bonus will be paid if the 2004 YTD cumulative Operating Profit at
the end of these quarters is less than $580K.

This agreement will be added to your existing contract and will be in effect Q1
through Q4, 2004.

/s/ Thomas Sparrvik                      /s/ Richard L. Poss
--------------------------------------   --------------------------------------
Thomas Sparrvik, CEO                     Richard L. Poss
                                         Chairman, Compensation Committee

                                         /s/ David C. Malmberg
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         David C. Malmberg
                                         Chairman
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Bruce Johnson, the Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
undersigned's knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2004
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:  August 5, 2004                                   /s/ Bruce Johnson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Bruce Johnson,
                                                         Sr. Vice President and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon CHAN-ASTORGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50162.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 14, 2007.

*656Christina M. McCall, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Casey Donovan, Esq., Law Offices of Anthony E. Colombo Jr., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See**656Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Chan-Astorga (“Chan”) appeals his mandatory minimum 120-month sentence following a remand for re-sentencing. Chan raises several challenges to the sentence, including the contention that the district court erred in failing to apply the safety valve. We reject that contention and conclude that the district court did not err in imposing the mandatory minimum sentence. Therefore, we do not reach Chan’s remaining sentencing challenges because they are moot. *See United States v. Thornton,*444 F.3d 1163, 1168 (9th Cir.2006).

The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history of this case, so we do not repeat them here.

Chan contends that, after *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court had discretion to adjust the defendant’s criminal history calculation. We recently held in *United States v. Hemandez-Castro,*473 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir.2007), that district courts have no authority to adjust criminal history points for the purpose of determining eligibility for safety valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1). *Id.*at 1008.

Chan also contends that the termination of the probation, after remand of his case, erases two of his criminal history points. Chan failed to show, however, that the termination of his probation amounted to an expungement or similar invalidation of his probation that would warrant removal of the two criminal history points for *657committing a crime while on probation. *See United States v. Hayden,*255 F.3d 768, 773-74 (9th Cir.2001) (recognizing that a conviction must be rendered a nullity in order to avoid counting towards a defendant’s criminal history under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2). In addition, Chan was on probation at the time of his arrest, so the fact that his probation terminated pri- or to his re-sentencing hearing does not affect the application of U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d). Therefore, the district court properly found that Chan had three (3) criminal history points and was ineligible for the safety valve.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rodney E. Schwatken, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 10, 2010
/s/ Rodney E. SchwatkenRodney E. SchwatkenChief Financial Officer




This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
POWER OF ATTORNEY


The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Margaret M. Foran, Gene
  A. Capello, Lawrence A. Fox and Claire G. Keyles as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
  and agent, and grants each of them full power to act on behalf of the undersigned
  and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, for the purpose
  of completing and signing, on his behalf,

> - any Form 3, Form 4 or Form 5 required or permitted to be filed by him pursuant
>     to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
>     Act"), 
>     - any Form 144 required to be filed by him under the Securities Act of 1933,
>     as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Rule 144 promulgated thereunder,
>     and
>     - any and all other documents necessary or desirable to facilitate the filing
>     by him of Form 144 and of forms under Section 16 of the Exchange Act,

with regard to the undersigned's ownership of or transactions in securities
  of Pfizer Inc., including, without limitation, the power to complete and sign
  any and all amendments to such forms and documents, if any, and to file such
  forms and documents and amendments thereto with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission, and to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or
  necessary to be done in connection with such forms and documents and amendments
  thereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
  could do in person.

The authority of Margaret M. Foran, Gene A. Capello, Lawrence A. Fox and Claire
  G. Keyles under this Power of Attorney shall continue until the undersigned
  is no longer required to file Form 3, Form 4, Form 5 or Form 144 with regard
  to the undersigned's ownership of or transactions in securities of Pfizer Inc.,
  unless earlier revoked in writing. The undersigned acknowledges that Margaret
  M. Foran, Gene A. Capello, Lawrence A. Fox and Claire G. Keyles are not assuming
  any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Rule 144 under the
  Securities Act or Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Signature:/s/ Natale S. Ricciardi
  Natale S. Ricciardi

Date: September 23, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13327-13328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

[Document Identifier: HCFA-R-108]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration, HHS.
    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, is 
publishing the

[[Page 13328]]

following summary of proposed collections for public comment. 
Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this burden 
estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, 
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility 
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of 
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology to minimize the information 
collection burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: Extension of a currently 
approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Criteria for 
Medicare Coverage of Liver Transplants; Form No.: HCFA-R-108 (OMB# 
0938-0580); Use: Medicare participating hospitals must file an 
application to be approved for coverage and payment of liver 
transplants performed on Medicare beneficiaries; Frequency: Monthly; 
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; Number of Respondents: 
12; Total Annual Responses: 12; Total Annual Hours: 2,110.
    To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms 
for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above, access HCFA's 
Web Site address at http://www.hcfa.gov/regs/prdact95.htm, or E-mail 
your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and 
HCFA document identifier, to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2f2c3d2c7d0d5cdd0c9e2cac1c4c38cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="124273627760657d6079527a7174733c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the Reports 
Clearance Office on (410) 786-1326. Written comments and 
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be mailed 
within 30 days of this notice directly to the OMB desk officer: OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, Attention: Wendy Taylor, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
John P. Burke III,
HCFA Reports Clearance Officer, HCFA Office of Information Services, 
Security and Standards Group, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards.
[FR Doc. 01-5182 Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### TURNER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, and McCarthy/Hunt, JV, Defendant, and B.L. Harbert-Brasfield & Gorrie, JV, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 2010-5146, 2010-5158.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Before LOURIE, MAYER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

B.L. Harbert-Brasfield & Gorrie, JV, moves for a stay, pending disposition of this appeal, of the judgment entered by the United States Court of Federal Claims. Turner Construction Co., Inc. opposes. The United States opposes. B.L. Harbert-Brasfield & Gorrie replies.

To obtain a stay, pending appeal, a mov-ant must establish a strong likelihood of success on the merits or, failing that, nonetheless demonstrate a substantial case on the merits provided that the harm factors militate in its favor. *Standard Havens Prods. v. Gencor Indus.,*897 F.2d 511, 513 (Fed.Cir.1990) (citing *Hilton v. Braunskill,*481 U.S. 770, 778, 107 S.Ct. 2113, 95 L.Ed.2d 724 (1987)). In deciding whether to grant a stay, pending appeal, this court “assesses the movant’s chances of success on the merits and weighs the equities as they affect the parties and the public.” *E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.,*835 F.2d 277, 278 (Fed.Cir.1987); *see also Standard Havens Prods.,*897 F.2d at 513.

Based on the arguments in the motions papers, and without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of this case by a merits panel, we determine that B.L. Harbert-Brasfield & Gorrie has not met its burden to obtain a stay of the judgment.

Upon consideration thereof,

It is Ordered that:

The motion is denied.
Order entered November 2 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 01279
- CV
IN RE BOBBY GENE WOFFORD, Relator Original Proceeding from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 105 3505
- U 

### O RDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges and Justice Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus. Although we have considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus without filing of the required number of copies, we DENY as moot relator’s motion to file a single copy of his petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Motion Denied and Order filed January 31, 2023

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00514

- CV

____________ MOSAIC BAYBROOK ONE LP, MOSAIC BAYBROOK TWO, LP; MOSAIC BAYBROOK ONE GP LLC; MOSAIC BAYBROOK TWO GP LLC; MOSAIC RESIDENTI AL, INC.; ROBERT M . WEBER; VALISSA PARMER; ABID BHIMANI; MOSAIC GP FUND III LLC; EASTHAM CAPITAL FUND III (QP) LP; EASTHAM CAPITAL FUND IV, LP; AUSPAY

- BAYBROOK, LLC; AUSPAY

- MOSAIC GP, LLC; WILLIAMSBURG ENTERPRISES, LLLP; PHILIP SALEM; WIDAD SALEM; AND BAYB ROOK LL, LLC , App e llant s
V.
TAMMY CESSOR AND PAUL SIMIEN , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019

- 10104



### ORDER
Appellant s ’ motion for en banc reconsideration of the p anel opinion in appeal No. 14

- 19

- 00514

- CV is denied.

PER CURIAM

En Banc Court c onsists of C hief Justice Christopher and J u s t i c e s Wise, Jewell, Bourliot, Zimmerer, Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson ( Spain, J. , not par ticipating)

.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of First Trinity Financial Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies that:To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended December 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  April 29, 2008 By:  /s/ Gregg Zahn    Gregg Zahn,     President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         215,998
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  425,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,564)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,163,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          75,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,741)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,427,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        714,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,935,177
<OTHER-SE>                                   (810,589)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,427,776
<SALES>                                        344,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,727
<CGS>                                          297,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   113
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,215
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
2009-0683.

#### In re Guardianship of Hards.

Lake App. No. 2007-L-150, 2009-Ohio-1002.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Appellants’ motions for findings/conclusions, to correct the record, to strike from the records, and for summary judgment and appellee’s motion to strike appellants’ motion for summary judgment denied as moot.