alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 285 

To ensure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts Ditch headgate 

and ditch segment within the Holy Cross Wilderness in Eagle County, 

Colorado, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To ensure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts 

Ditch headgate and ditch segment within the Holy Cross 

Wilderness in Eagle County, Colorado, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bolts Ditch Access 

5 and Use Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOLTS DITCH ACCESS. 

7 (a) ACCESS GRANTED.—The Secretary of Agriculture 

8 shall permit by special use authorization nonmotorized acVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:27 Feb 09, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S285.IS S285

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 285 IS

1 cess and use, in accordance with section 293.6 of title 36, 

2 Code of Federal Regulations, of the Bolts Ditch Headgate 

3 and the Bolts Ditch within the Holy Cross Wilderness, 

4 Colorado, as designated by Public Law 96–560, for the 

5 purposes of the diversion of water and use, maintenance, 

6 and repair of such ditch and headgate by the Town of 

7 Minturn, Colorado, a Colorado Home Rule Municipality. 

8 (b) LOCATION OF FACILITIES.—The Bolts Ditch 

9 headgate and ditch segment referenced in subsection (a) 

10 are as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Bolts Ditch 

11 headgate and Ditch Segment’’, dated November, 2015. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
[No. 57304-7-I.

Division One.

October 1, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Samuel Leon Dugan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-1-08151-8, Douglass A. North, J., entered November 15, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Download Invoices of Merged or Acquired Institutions

Go to: https://www.fdicconnect.gov

− Sign-in

− Press Continue

− If the "Assessment Statements/Official Correspondence" transaction is turned on, go to 

Step 1 below

− Select “Coordinator Functions” from the FDICconnect Business Center Menu

− Select “Manage Transactions”

− Click on the radio button (in the select column) next to “Assessment Statements/Official 

Correspondence”

− Click the “Manage Transaction Users” button at the bottom of the screen

− Select “Execute” in the “Privileges” column next to your name

− Click the “Update Privileges” button at the bottom of the screen

− Select “Menu” (located in the upper right corner) to return to the Business Center Menu 

1. Select Deposit Insurance Assessment 

2. Select Assessment Statements/Official Correspondence 

3. Click the tab “Acquired Institution(s) List” 

4. Click the blue underlined Certificate Number for the Acquired Institution you wish to 

view 

5. Click the first blue underlined invoice number for the most current invoice of the 

Acquired Institution 

If you need assistance, please contact the FDICconnect Helpdesk at 877-275-3342 (Select 

Option 4) or 703-516-1069 or email fdicconnect@fdic.gov.
|                                                   |  |                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|---------------------------------------------------|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| /s/ Barton Brookman                       |  | February 22, 2023 |
| Barton Brookman                                   |  |                   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |  |                   |
| (principal executive officer)                     |  |                   |
|                                                   |  |                   |
| /s/ R. Scott Meyers                       |  | February 22, 2023 |
| R. Scott Meyers                                   |  |                   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                   |
| (principal financial officer)                     |  |                   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0033

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JUSTIN LEE LONGTINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 14, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 9 2020

09/09/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0033
EXHIBIT 10.35
  
 Re:
    
    Tenth Amendment to Subscriber Services Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2007 (Agreement)
between Travelport, LP (Travelport), Travelport Global Distribution System B.V., (TGDS)
and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC (Subscriber)
    1.
    
    The Custom Terms and Conditions Attachment (Galileo Services)  RoW is amended as
set forth in Exhibit A.2.
    
    General. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
and be enforceable by the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, except as
expressly provided in the Agreement. Each Party to this Amendment agrees that, other than
as expressly set out in this Amendment, nothing in this Amendment is intended to alter the
rights, duties and obligations of the Parties under the Agreement, which shall remain in
full force and effect as amended hereby. In the event of a conflict between the terms and
conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and
conditions of this Amendment shall govern. This Amendment may be executed by the Parties
in separate counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, but all
such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
 1




---



##### 



Orbitz Worldwide, LLC
    
    Travelport, LPBy: Travelport Holdings, LLC, its General PartnerSignature:
    
    /s/ Stephen Praven
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Scott HydenName:
    
    Stephen Praven
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Scott HydenTitle:
    
    VP, Business Development
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    VP, SalesDate: 10/25/10
    
    Date: 10/25/10Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.Signature:
    
    /s/ Marco van IeperenName:
Title:
    
    Marco van Ieperen
DirectorDate: 10/26/10
 2
Exhibit 23.4


                     CONSENT OF SGS LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 40-F) of Crystallex International Corporation (the "Company") of
references to and a summary of those sections prepared by us in (i) the
feasibility study completed by us and other independent consultants in
September 2003 entitled "Las Cristinas Project, Feasibility Study, September
2003 (20,000 t/d Feasibility Study)" and (ii) the development plan completed by
us and other independent consultants in August 2005 entitled "Development
Plan--2005, Update to the Feasibility Study Issued September 2003 (Development
Plan)" (collectively, the "Incorporated Information"), included in the Annual
Information Form for the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

         We also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the
Incorporated Information into all of the Company's outstanding registration
statements on Forms F-2, F-3, F-10 and S-8 that have been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

         Dated this 29th day of March, 2007.

                                                    SGS LAKEFIELD RESEARCH LTD.


                                                    /s/ CHRIS A. FLEMING
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    Chris A. Fleming
                                                    Vice President, Global
                                                      Mutallurgy
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,





As Adopted Pursuant to





Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of American Jianye Greentech Holdings, Ltd. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  Haipeng Wang, as President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated: December 27, 2011

/s/ Haipeng WangName:  Haipeng WangTitle:  President(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Jianye Greentech Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by American Jianye Greentech Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 14000 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ AMIR ASHERIAN, HOOSHANG ASHERIAN, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

versus ERICA FORD, ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS,

Defendants

- Appellants.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia USCA11 Case: 23-14000 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 14000
D.C. Docket No. 1:23

- cv

- 04460

- JPB

____________________ Before J ORDAN , J ILL P RYOR , and G RANT , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. Erica Ford and all other occupants of a property owned by Amir and Hooshang Asherian appeal from the district court’s order remandin g the case to state court. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)

- (d); New v. Sports & Recreation , 114 F.3d 1092, 1095

- 96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc. , 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rul es. USCA11 Case: 23-14000 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024 Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Y. McGovern, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 16, 2004                      /s/ Michael Y. McGovern
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael Y. McGovern
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicholas Antonio COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-4742.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 18, 2014.

Decided: April 24, 2014.

William S. Trivette, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael A. De-*218Franco, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, GREGORY, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas Antonio Cooper appeals the eight-month sentence of imprisonment imposed by the district court after revocation of his supervised release. Counsel has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), certifying that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning whether Cooper’s sentence is plainly unreasonable. Although notified of his right to do so, Cooper has not filed a supplemental brief. We affirm.

“A district court has broad discretion when imposing a sentence upon revocation of supervised release.” *United States v. Webb,*738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir.2013). “We will affirm a revocation sentence if it is within the statutory maximum and is not “ ‘plainly unreasonable.’ ” ” *Id.*(quoting *United States v. Crudup,*461 F.3d 433, 439-40 (4th Cir.2006)). “In making this determination, we first consider whether the sentence imposed is procedurally or substantively unreasonable.” *Id.*Only if we so find, will “we ... then decide whether the sentence is *plainly*unreasonable.” *Crudup,*461 F.3d at 439.

Here, the district court correctly calculated Cooper’s advisory policy statement range and considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors applicable to sentencing upon revocation of supervised release. The district court also adequately explained the basis for Cooper’s sentence. Thus, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Cooper.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious grounds for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform Cooper, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Cooper requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Cooper. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
2009-1443.

#### State v. Dillon.

Muskingum App. No. 2008-CA-37, 2009-Ohio-3134.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lottery & Wagering Solutions Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dallas R. Dempster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                      /s/ Dallas R. Dempster
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      February 11, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.1.4

                     [BENCHMARK COMMUNICATIONS LETTERHEAD]




                                 April 8, 1997



Benchmark Acquisition, Inc.
BCR Holding, Inc.
Capstar Broadcasting Partners, Inc.
c/o Hicks, Muse, Furst & Tate Incorporated
1325 Avenue of the Americas, 25th Floor
New York, NY 10019
Attn:  Peter Brodsky


     Re:  Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Benchmark Communications
          Radio Limited Partnership, Benchmark Acquisition, Inc., Benchmark
          Radio Acquisition Fund I Limited Partnership,  Benchmark Radio 
          Acquisition Fund IV Limited Partnership,  Benchmark Radio Acquisition
          Fund VII Limited Partnership,  Benchmark Radio Acquisition Fund VIII
          Limited Partnership, Joseph L. Mathias, Bruce R. Spector, Capstar
          Broadcasting Partners, Inc. and BCR Holding, Inc. dated as of 
          December 9, 1996 (the "Merger Agreement")


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         This letter, when signed by each of us, will memorialize our agreement
with respect to the matters set forth herein.

         Section 4.13 of the Merger Agreement requires Benchmark to file a Form
5500 for the Benchmark Communications Disability Income Plan under the
Department of Labor's Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program and to
incur all costs relating to such filing. Benchmark represents and warrants to
Mergeco that it is not required to file a Form 5500 with respect to its
Disability Income Plan because (1) less than 100 persons are covered by such
Plan (and less than 100 persons were covered by such Plan at the beginning of
the Plan year) and (2) such Plan is a fully insured welfare benefit plan. Based
upon this representation, Mergeco and its affiliates agree to waive the
provisions of Section 4.13 of the Merger Agreement.





<PAGE>   2


Benchmark Acquisition, Inc.
BCR Holding, Inc.
Capstar Broadcasting Partners, Inc.
April 8, 1997
Page 2


    Please countersign this letter below to indicate your agreement with
respect to the matters set forth herein.


                                                BENCHMARK COMMUNICATIONS RADIO
                                                LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


                                                /s/ BRUCE R. SPECTOR
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By:  BRUCE R. SPECTOR
                                                Its:  General Partner

Agreed to and Accepted,

BENCHMARK ACQUISITION, INC.


/s/ PETER S. BRODSKY
------------------------------
By:   PETER S. BRODSKY
Its:


BCR HOLDING, INC.


/s/ PETER S. BRODSKY
------------------------------
By:  PETER S. BRODSKY
Its:


CAPSTAR BROADCASTING PARTNERS, INC.


/s/ PETER S. BRODSKY
------------------------------
By:  PETER S. BRODSKY
Its:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

s1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145467

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145467

COA: 309175

Wayne CC: 11

- 002713

- FH

SHANNON EUGENE THOMAS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of General Bearing Corporation and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned President and Controller of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief: 1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

Date: November 11, 2003.


/s/ David L. Gussack
---------------------------------
David L. Gussack
President


/s/ Rocky Cambrea
---------------------------------
Rocky Cambrea
Controller


                                                                              22
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION FOR 

### R EHEARING

Case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 452

- CV

Style: Cameron International Corporation, Appellant v. Jeremy Guillory, Appellee

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing

Part y filing motion: Appell ee

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ J a ne Bland

Justice Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justice s Higley

, Bland, and Sharp

.

Date: October 23 , 2014

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2563 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2563

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-
             6-dodecyl-4-methylphenol, branched and linear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1993

 Mr. Callahan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-
             6-dodecyl-4-methylphenol, branched and linear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-(2H-BENZOTRIAZOL-2-YL)-6-DODECYL-4-METHYLPHENOL, BRANCHED 
              AND LINEAR.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new subheading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-6-dodecyl-4-methylphenol,                          No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        branched and linear (provided for in subheading                                                               31/94           ''
                        2933.90.37).............................................  Free                                                                 .

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
fifteenth day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board
of Directors


Western
Goldfields Inc.





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-138151-99, No. 138021-99) and Form S-3 (No. 333-144685) of Western
Goldfields Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2007 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/ HJ
& Associates, LLC


Salt Lake
City, Utah


USA


March 5,
2009
2009-1658.

#### Foreman v. Ragheb.

Lucas App. No. L-08-1415, 2009-Ohio-3912.