alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2786

To terminate most-favored-nation duty treatment for the products of Croatia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. WOLF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To terminate most-favored-nation duty treatment for the

products of Croatia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF MFN TREATMENT FOR PROD4 UCTS OF CROATIA.

5 Effective with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn

6 from warehouse for consumption, in the customs territory

7 of the United States on or after the 15th day after the

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the duties set forth in

9 rate column 2 (relating to duties applicable to non-MFN

10 countries) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Unit11 ed States apply to the products of Croatia.
2

•HR 2786 IH

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1
<CASH>                                                 1,917
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         14,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                            (799)
<INVENTORY>                                            1,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      17,637
<PP&E>                                                 5,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (1,048)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        30,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 16,884
<BONDS>                                                7,790 <F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                  41
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          30,680
<SALES>                                               40,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      40,851
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         40,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         101 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          108
<INCOME-TAX>                                               2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        5
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                               5
<EPS-BASIC>                                              .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .00
<FN>
<F1> Mortgages And Similar Debt
<F2> Minority Interest
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### Flor De Maria OROPEZA SALAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70439.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Decided Jan. 6, 2011.

Joubin Nasseri, Nasseri Law Group, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

R. Alexander Goring, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Lisa Marie Arnold, *Senior*Litigation Counsel, Brendan Paul Hogan, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Flor de Maria Oropeza Salas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, including whether a conviction qualifies as a crime involving moral turpitude. *See Galeana-Mendoza v. Gonzales, 465 F.3d*1054, 1056-57 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.

Oropeza Salas has waived any challenge to the agency’s determination that she is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal based on two convictions for crimes involving moral turpitude. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

We do not consider Oropeza Salas’ contentions regarding physical presence, mor*41al character and hardship because her failure to establish statutory eligibility based on her convictions is dispositive.

Oropeza Salas is statutorily ineligible for voluntary departure because she was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude committed during the five-year period preceding her application. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(3); *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i).

We grant Oropeza Salas’ counsel’s motion to withdraw as attorney of record. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect that Oropeza Salas is proceeding pro se. The Clerk shall serve this order on Oropeza Salas at the address provided in the certificate of service: 1402 San Pascual St. # 14, Santa Barbara, CA 93101.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,429,358
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,960,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,961,225
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     32,285,675
<ALLOWANCE>                                    489,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,061,796
<DEPOSITS>                                  35,816,996
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            188,133
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       950,980
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,106,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              44,061,796
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,805,777
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               83,600
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               124,995
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,014,372
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             573,430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             573,430
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,440,942
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  124,421
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,202,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                147,996
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     147,996
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   147,996
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.98
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               373,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              489,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           489,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Small Business Lending Survey i

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The insights from the Small Business Lending 

Survey (SBLS) are a result of the contributions of 

a large number of U.S. banks. In particular, the 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) 

sincerely thanks the approximately 1,200 banks that 

responded to the survey. Without their invaluable 

participation, it would not have been possible to 

provide a nationally representative picture of banks’ 

small business lending practices, or to compare the 

experiences of different-sized banks. 

In addition, 40 banks across the U.S. participated in 

interviews with FDIC staff, helping ensure that the 

questions asked by the SBLS were understandable, 

answerable, and relevant to the banking industry. 

These conversations were necessary because the 

SBLS was specifically designed to cover topics not 

already addressed by other data sources. Another 

11 banks were visited to test the functionality of the 

web interface used to collect survey responses. The 

FDIC thanks these 51 banks for giving generously of 

their time and expertise to the development of the 

final survey questionnaire.

Multiple divisions of the FDIC collaborated to 

complete this study. Staff from the FDIC’s Division of 

Insurance and Research (DIR) led and coordinated 

the survey development, implementation, analysis, 

and writing. The primary authors of the report are 

DIR staff Jacob Goldston, Yan Y. Lee, and Smith 

Williams. Valuable research and analytical support 

were provided by DIR staff Claire Brennecke, Alexis 

Ercolino, Isabella Jaeger, Maria Hussain, Chet Polson, 

Benjamin Rodriguez, and Jeffery Traczynski. Karyen 

Chu of the Division of Depositor and Consumer 

Protection (DCP) and Jack Reidhill (DIR) provided 

invaluable insight and guidance throughout all phases 

of the project. Kris Rengert from DCP and Rae-Ann 

Miller and Suzy S. Gardner from the Division of Risk 

Management Supervision contributed to the survey 

development phase. A number of senior officials and 

staff provided helpful comments and suggestions on 

drafts of the report; from DIR, Fred Carns, Richard 

Brown, Phillip Shively, Rosalind Bennett, Stefan 

Jacewitz, and Jonathan Pogach, and from DCP, 

Keith Ernst. 

Neeta Allagh and Donna Vogel from DIR very ably 

guided us through the publication process. Heather 

Woods, from the FDIC’s Graphic Design and Printing 

Unit, prepared the report for publication and provided 

design support. Our external editor Jane Lewin very 

thoroughly edited the text of this report.

Finally, we thank staff at the U.S. Census Bureau, 

which the FDIC contracted to assist in developing 

the survey, build the web interface, conduct the 

data collection, and protect respondent identities 

from disclosure.

Diane Ellis

Director, Division of Insurance and Research
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ RUSSEL H. MCMEEKINRussel H. McMeekinChief Executive Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

ROBERT MOORE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D22-229

LT Case No. 2007-CF-127

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 20, 2022

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,

A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Robert Moore, Crawfordville, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, 

repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and 

sentence in Citrus County Circuit Court Case Number 2007-CF-127, this 

court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not 

be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 

48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails 
2

to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that 

Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further 

pro se filings.

In order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from 

filing with this court any further pro se filings concerning Citrus County Circuit 

Court Case No. 2007-CF-127. The Clerk of this court is directed not to 

accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk 

will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless 

filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 

652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk 

is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate 

institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), 

Fla. Stat. (2019); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2005).

Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and NARDELLA, JJ, concur.
;::# United States Department of Agriculture 

United Kingdom - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Meat to the United States 

January 2, 2024 

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*) 

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted 

2060 Karro Food Ltd. 02/18/2002 

2077 Foyle Melton Mowbray 10/22/2021 

2093 Cranswick Country Foods PLC 04/19/2011 

2172 Foyle Food Group, Foyle Gloucester 05/20/2021 

4085 Pilgrim's Pride Ltd. 01/17/2013 

5091 Pilgrim's Pride Ltd. 01/11/2016 

7015 Dunbia (UK) Llanybydder 09/30/2022 

7176 Kepak Group Ltd., St Merryn - Merthyr & Cold Storage 09/09/2020 

8061 Pilgrim's Pride Ltd. 11/01/2016 

8216 ABP Yetminster 12/21/2023 

9016 Foyle Food Group, Campsie 09/09/2020 

9022 Granville Food Care Ltd. (Cold Storage) 02/16/2012 

9052 Karro Food Group 04/08/2002 

9064 Ardboe Coldstore Ltd (Cold Storage) 05/27/2022 

* DL005 Thermotraffic Ltd. (Change of Name From Norish Limited (Cold Storage), Effective 01/01/2024) 08/03/2021 

DL051 Dunbia (UK) Halesowen 07/05/2023 

LI 036 Bowman Stores, Ltd. (Cold Storage) 11/15/2021 

NE 028 Magnavale Chesterfield Ltd. (Cold Storage) 02/04/2016 

SR 020 Magnavale Scunthorpe Ltd. (Cold Storage) 10/15/2014 

TK 009 ACS&T Tewkesbury (Green Lane) (Cold Storage) 05/26/2021 10/18/2023 

TK 020 ACS&T Tewkesbury (Northway Lane) (Cold Storage) 08/03/2021 10/18/2023 

TK024 Constellation Cold Logistics UK 2 Ltd 10/19/2023 

TK025 Constellation Cold Logistics UK 2 Ltd 10/19/2023 

* WX 7158 Thermotraffic Ltd. (Change of Name From Norish Limited (Cold Storage), Effectve 01/01/2024) 01/29/2013 
 

 

 

 

 

USDA 

;::# United States Department of Agriculture 

United Kingdom - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Meat to the United States 

January 2, 2024 

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*) 

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted 

XA 007 ABP Hull (Cold Storage) 01/01/2008 

ZU027 Americold Lurgan Warehouse (Cold Storage) 05/26/2021 

* Change of Cold Storage Name from NORISH LITMITED to THERMOTRAFFIC LTD., effective Jan. 1, 2024
Exhibit 35.1

HomEq Servicing


                              ANNUAL CERTIFICATION


      Re:   Securitized Asset Backed Receivables, LLC Trust, Series 2007-BR1
            (the "Trust"), issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
            Agreement, dated as of 03/01/2007 (the "Pooling and Servicing
            Agreement"), by and among Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC,
            as depositor (the "Depositor"), Deutsche Bank National Trust
            Company, as trustee (the "Trustee"), and Barclays Capital Real
            Estate Inc. d/b/a HomEq Servicing, as servicer (the "Servicer").

I, Arthur Q. Lyon, Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the
HomEq Servicing Division of Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. d/b/a HomEq
Servicing, hereby certify to the Depositor and the Trustee and their officers,
directors, and affiliates, pursuant to Section 3.22 of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, that:

         A review of the activities of the Servicer for the Calendar year ending
         December 31, 2007, and to the best of my knowledge, based on such
         review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
         Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects, except as
         noted below.

         Foreclosure was not initiated in accordance with the timeframes
         established by its servicing agreements and the servicing criteria set
         forth in 1122(d)(4)(vii) of Regulation AB and therefore represents an
         instance of material noncompliance.


Date:   March 13, 2008


/s/ Arthur Q. Lyon
---------------------
Arthur Q. Lyon
Executive Vice President and CEO
HomEq Servicing Division
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.


Barclays Officer's Certificate
Securitized Asset Backed Receivables, LLC Trust, Series 2007-BR1
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2768

To ratify the transfer of a parcel of land by the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo

of Texas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To ratify the transfer of a parcel of land by the Ysleta

del Sur Pueblo of Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF PARCEL BY YSLETA DEL SUR

4 PUEBLO.

5 (a) RATIFICATION.—The transfer of the land de6 scribed in subsection (b), together with fixtures thereon,

7 on July 12, 1991, by the Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo is hereby

8 ratified and shall be deemed to have been made in accord9 ance with the Constitution and all laws of the United

10 States that are specifically applicable to transfers of land
2

•HR 2768 IH

1 from, by, or on behalf of any Indian, Indian nation, or

2 tribe or band of Indians (including section 2116 of the

3 Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 177)) as if Congress had

4 given its consent prior to the transfer.

5 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The lands referred to in

6 subsection (a) are more particularly described as follows:

7 Tract 1–B–1 (1.9251 acres) and Tract 1–B–2–A

8 (0.0748 acres), Block 2 San Elizario, El Paso

9 County, Texas.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GT Solar International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended March 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Zarrella, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date:
June 9, 2009

/s/ THOMAS M. ZARRELLA Thomas M. Zarrella President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GT Solar International, Inc. and will be retained by GT Solar International, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Val J. Christensen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of EnergySolutions,Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of EnergySolutions, Inc.

March 31, 2011

By:

/s/ VAL J. CHRISTENSEN Val J. Christensen, President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
[No. 57817-1-I.

Division One.

August 20, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Giavonni S. Kinsey, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 05-1-00782-5, Michael E. Rickert, J., entered February 7, 2006. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Bruce Johnson, the Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
undersigned's knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30,
     2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: November 4, 2004                                    Bruce Johnson
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Bruce Johnson,
                                                    Sr. Vice President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer