alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Ann                      C. W. Green                                 |
|   | Chief                      Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary |

----
2009-1439.

#### State v. Von Mincy.

Hamilton App. No. C-080369. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2008-2133 and 2008-2228, *State v. Underwood,*Montgomery App. No. 22454, 2008-Ohio-4748; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Aerospace Vehicle Systems Institute (``AVSI'') 
Cooperative

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 7, 2000, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Aerospace Vehicle Systems 
Institute (``AVSI'') Cooperative has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership and production status. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Honeywell, Inc., 
Phoenix, AZ; and Allied Signal, Inc., Bellevue, WA have merged to form 
Honeywell International, Inc., Morristown, NJ. BFGoodrich, Charlotte, 
NC, acting through its BFGoodrich Aerospace Division, and Smith 
Industries, Grand Rapids, MI acting through its Smiths Industries 
Aerospace Division have been added as parties to this venture. 
Additionally, the AVSI Cooperative intends to work on the following 
joint research project: ``Certification Issues for Embedded Object 
Oriented Software''--To investigate issues concerning the use of 
embedded object-oriented software in aerospace systems which require 
certification via the FAA DO-178B. The project will investigate 
advantages, study issues and recommend guidelines for the use of 
specific object-oriented, embedded software in safety-critical systems.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Aerospace Vehicle Systems Institute 
(``AVSI'') Cooperative intends to file additional written notification 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 18, 1998, Aerospace Vehicle Systems Institute 
(``AVSI'') Cooperative filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on February 
18, 1999 (64 FR 8123).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
21, 1999. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 22, 2000 (65 FR 15174).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-5070 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
August 18,
2010                                                                           /s/ Wanwen
Su
 Wanwen Su
 President,
Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer, Controller
#### Michael Craig CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teresa H. COBB; Stephen A. Cobb, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-2157.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2007.

Decided: March 27, 2007.

Michael Craig Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph Courtland DuVall, Breeden, Salb, Beasley & DuVall, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging negligence following an automobile accident. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Clark v. Cobb,*No. 2:06-cv-00179-RBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 00N-1379]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Procedures for the Safe Processing and Importing of Fish and Fishery Products” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD  20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 21, 2000 (65 FR 45382), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.   An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0354.  The approval expires on February 29, 2004.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                

Dated:  February 23, 2001.

William K. Hubbard,

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.

[FR Doc. 01-5018 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                                             786
<SECURITIES>                                    33,157
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,258
<PP&E>                                           7,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,391)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,905
<SALES>                                         31,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,194
<CGS>                                           14,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,220
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,220
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        



</TABLE>
#### LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY and Lincoln Global, Inc., Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and The ESAB Group, Inc., Intervenor, and Sidergas SpA, Intervenor.

No. 2011-1087.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 25, 2011.

*333Terrance J. Wikberg, Perkins Coie, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellants.

Before MOORE, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Sidergas SpA and The ESAB Group, Inc. (ESAB) move to dismiss Lincoln Electric Company and Lincoln Global, Inc.’s (Lincoln) appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Lincoln opposes. ESAB replies.

Lincoln filed an appeal of an adverse International Trade Commission determination. Lincoln states that it inadvertently identified ESAB and not the ITC as the appellee in the caption on the notice of appeal. However, the notice of appeal did expressly name the ITC as the forum that decided the matter. This court docketed the appeal and named the ITC as the appellee on the court’s official caption. Lincoln states that it served the Commission with a copy of the notice of appeal. The Commission entered an appearance soon thereafter as an appellee.

ESAB asserts that Lincoln’s appeal must be dismissed because Lincoln failed to include the ITC as a respondent in the *caption*of the notice of appeal, which ESAB asserts Lincoln must do pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 15(a). That rule states, in relevant part, that a notice of appeal must “name the agency as a respondent.” Fed. R.App. P. 15(a)(2)(A).

We agree with ESAB that a failure to identify an appellant on a notice of appeal would deprive this court of jurisdiction to hear from that appellant under Fed. RApp. P. 15(a). *See Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.,*487 U.S. 312, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 101 L.Ed.2d 285, (1988), *superseded in part by 1993 revision to Fed. R.App. P. 3(c),*(Fed. R.App. P. 3(c) required that each appellant be named in a notice of appeal and court could not waive that deficiency because it was a jurisdictional requirement). However, we do not find convincing the argument that the failure to include the proper appellee in the *caption*of the appeal constitutes a jurisdictional deficiency. As here, when the document does identify the agency and the ITC received notice of the appeal because Lincoln served a copy on the ITC, the failure to include the agency again in the caption of the appeal appears harmless and is not a jurisdictional deficiency.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

ESAB’s motion to dismiss is denied. Lincoln’s opening brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00384-CV

Brenda Combes and Tom Combes

v.

Tarsem Gill

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (CV-2013-02510)

January 30, 2014

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the stay entered on January 3, 2014, should be lifted and the appeal should be 

dismissed. It is ordered that the stay entered on January 3, 2014, is lifted and 

the appeal is dismissed.

It is further ordered that Appellants Brenda Combes and Tom Combes 

shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

West Marine, Inc. and its subsidiaries do business under the following names: West Marine Products, West Marine, BoatU.S.,and Port Supply. The following is a list of the subsidiaries of West Marine, Inc., including the state of incorporation or jurisdiction of organization of each subsidiary: 

 

West Marine Products, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine Puerto Rico, Inc., a California corporation 

W Marine Management Company, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine LBC, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine IHC I, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine Canada Corp., a Nova Scotia Unlimited Liability Company
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00458-CV

Stephano Aviles, Appellant

v.

Jessica Lynn Aviles, Appellee

FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY 

NO. 310,152-C, THE HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due on December 2, 2019. On February 18, 2020, 

this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to 

file a satisfactory response by February 28, 2020, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for 

want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 5, 2020
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

         On July 23, 2002, the Audit Committee approved discontinuing the
engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen") as the Company's
independent auditors and engaging Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte & Touche") to
serve as the Company's independent auditors for the year ending December 31,
2002. This Form 10-K, which includes the report of Arthur Andersen on our
consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 30, 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended December 30, 2001, is incorporated by
reference into the Company's filings on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-26297,
333-65379,333-86222 and 333-88973) (collectively, the "Registration
Statements"). After reasonable efforts, we have been unable to obtain Arthur
Andersen's consent to incorporate by reference into the Registration Statements
its audit report with respect to the Company's financial statements of the
Company as of December 30, 2001 and for the two years then ended. Under these
circumstances, Rule 437(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, permits
us to file this Form 10-K without such consent from Arthur Andersen. The absence
of such consent may limit recovery by investors on certain claims, including the
inability of investors to assert claims against Arthur Andersen under Section 11
of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained, or
any omissions to state a material fact required to be stated, in those audited
financial statements. In addition, the ability of Arthur Andersen to satisfy any
claims (including claims arising from Arthur Andersen's provision of auditing
and other services to us) may be limited as a practical matter due to recent
events regarding Arthur Andersen.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11




                         MARINE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
          COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE FOR THE THREE MONTHS
                                     ENDING
                        MARCH 31, 1997 AND MARCH 31, 1996
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              1997             1996
                                                          -----------      -----------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>
Common shares outstanding at January 1:                     2,701,110        2,007,576

Effective shares issuable under common stock options,
  warrants, convertable securities using the Treasury
  Stock Method:                                               335,667          628,097

Receivable shares:                                            (77,767)         (77,767)
                                                          -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding:                        2,959,010        2,557,906
                                                          ===========      ===========

Net loss for period:                                      $  (527,854)     $  (238,923)

Excess proceeds using Treasury Stock Method:                     --             25,710

Adjusted net loss:                                        $  (527,854)     $  (213,213)
                                                          -----------      -----------

Loss per share:                                           $     (0.18)     $     (0.08)
                                                          ===========      ===========
</TABLE>

                 See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

------------

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Dateof earliest event reported)  April 20, 2005

Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation

(Exact Name ofRegistrant as Specified in Charter)

Nevada                              0-7246                               95-2636730

(State or OtherJurisdiction                                      (Commission                                                   (IRS Employer

of Incorporation)                                                       FileNumber)                                       Identification No.)

103 East MainStreet; Bridgeport, WV    26330

(Address ofPrincipal Executive Offices)

Registrant'stelephone number, including area code    304-842-3597

no change

(Former Name orFormer Address, if Changed Since Last Report

Item 7.01.               Regulation FD Disclosure.

                On April 20, 2005, Steven R. Williams, Chairman and CEOof Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation ("the Company") will make a presentation at the IPAAConference. The transcript of Mr. Williams' presentation is attached in Exhibit9.01.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c)  Exhibits.

The annual report is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporatedherein by reference.

SIGNATURES

                Pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                                   

Petroleum Development Corporation

Date  April 20, 2005             

By  /s/ Darwin L.Stump                                  

        Darwin L.Stump

        ChiefFinancial Officer
SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

------------

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Dateof earliest event reported)  January 19, 2006

Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation

(Exact Name ofRegistrant as Specified in Charter)

Nevada                              0-7246                               95-2636730

(State or OtherJurisdiction                                      (Commission                                                   (IRS Employer

of Incorporation)                                                       FileNumber)                                       Identification No.)

103 East MainStreet; Bridgeport, WV    26330

(Address ofPrincipal Executive Offices)

Registrant'stelephone number, including area code    304-842-3597

no change

(Former Name orFormer Address, if Changed Since Last Report

----

Item 7.01.       Regulation FD Disclosure

                        On January 19, 2006, the Company will conduct awebcast and conference call to discuss the 3rd Quarter 2005 earningsresults. The slide presentation which will be presented with this webcast isattached herein as Exhibit 99.1.

----

EXHIBIT INDEX

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c)  Exhibits.

The news releases are filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporatedherein by reference.

----

SIGNATURES

                Pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                                   

Petroleum Development Corporation

Date  January 19, 2006             

By  /s/ Darwin L.Stump                                  

        Darwin L.Stump

        ChiefFinancial Officer