alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3592] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition, “The Legacy of Lord Carnarvon: Miniatures from Ancient Egypt and the Valley of the Kings”, imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the University of Wyoming Art Museum, Laramie, WY from on or about April 6, 2001, through on or about September 2, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: February 22, 2001. 

Helena Kane Finn, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-5150 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 3, 2015

h0223 

# Order

Clerk March 3, 2015

148283

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148283

COA: 316354

Oakland CC: 2011

- 237392

- FH

WALTER JAMES HART, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[No. 25186-1-III.

Division Three.

August 21, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kenneth Allen Crary, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 05-1-01647-1, Craig J. Matheson, J., entered May 5, 2006. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kulik, J., concurred in by Brown and Stephens, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NEW VISUAL
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 31, 1999 AND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       23
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    23
<PP&E>                                             307
<DEPRECIATION>                                     189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                       (922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       244
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    82
<CGS>                                              106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (853)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-383-021]

Take notice that on February 23, 2001, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 1404, with an effective date of November 1, 2000.

DTI states that the filing is being made to comply with the Commission's January 24, 2001, Letter Order in the Docket No. RP96-383-016.

DTI states that copies of its letter of transmittal and enclosures have been served upon DTI's customers and interested state commissions.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protest must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission, and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm*.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-5355  Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Jose Guadalupe MENDOZA-MARIN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-73747.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2013.*

April 11, 2014.

Nikhil M. Shah, I, Esquire, General, Law Offices of Nikhil M. Shah, Los Ange-les, CA, for Petitioner.

James Arthur Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, U.S. Department Of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Guadalupe Mendoza-Marin, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Mendoza-Marin’s motion to reopen where he failed to establish prejudice arising from any alleged ineffective assistance by his former attorneys. *See id.*at 793-94 (“[Prejudice results when the performance of counsel was so inadequate that it *may*have affected the outcome of the proceedings.” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EX-35.3
(logo) CHASE


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


RE: J.P. Morgan Mortgage Trust 2007-S1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates: This
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), by
and among J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I, a Delaware corporation, as
depositor (the "Depositor"), U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the
"Trustee") and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its dual capacities as master servicer
(the "Master Servicer") and securities administrator (the "Securities
Administrator") and acknowledged by J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp., a
Delaware corporation, as seller (the "Seller"), for purposes of Sections 2.04
and 2.05 and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, a national banking
association and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., a national banking
association, as custodians (each a "Custodian and together, the "Custodians"),
for purposes of Sections 11.01, 11.02, 11.03, 11.06, 11.07 and 11.09

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the J.P. Morgan Mortgage
Trust 2007-S1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (The "Agreement"), does hereby
certify that:

(1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ending
December 31, 2007 and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has
been made under my supervision; and

(2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such year.

Date: 02/28/2008

JPMorgan Chase Bank,
National Association,
as Servicer
By: /s/ David Lowman
Name: David Lowman
Title: Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Joseph K. Jachinowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



November 19, 2004



/s/ JOSEPH K. JACHINOWSKIJoseph K. Jachinowski Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45015

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TYLER JAMES WALTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 369

Filed: February 26, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled 

substance, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Tyler James Walton pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. Idaho Code 

§ 37-2732(c). The district court sentenced Walton to a unified term of seven years with two 

years determinate. Walton appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by 

imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Walton’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-508

In Re: ALFRED J. VINCENT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-75-23-W)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred J. Vincent, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfred J. Vincent's petition for mandamus is meritless and is

therefore denied. His motions for appointment of counsel, for recusal of members of this court, for dismissal of No. 81-1513, for

certification of questions to the Supreme Court, and to vacate a

district court judgment are also denied for lack of merit. Finally,

because no member of the court has requested a poll, Vincent's motion for hearing en banc is denied. We also deny Vincent's motions

for in forma pauperis status and for oral argument and "Request for

Hearing" because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Banking on Data: Great Possibilities, Great Responsibilities Webinar Series

AGENDA

1:00pm – Welcome Remarks 

1:05pm – Improving Financial Regulation (RegTech/SupTech)

Join us for a panel discussion on state, national, and international 

perspectives on technologies that support regulatory agency functions, 

regulatory frameworks and processes, and innovations in the financial 

regulatory domain. How can new technology enable innovation that 

leads to better outcomes for consumers, banks, and regulators?

2:00pm – Q&A Session 

2:25pm – Closing Remarks
John Edwards, Owner

Trackside Butcher Shoppe, Est. M45607

Notice of Suspension Held in Abeyance 

August 29, 2023

3

Cc: Ms. Melissa Moore, EARO

, Humane Handling Enforcement Coordinator 

Mr. Larry Hortert, OIEA Regional Director 

Dr. Larry Davis, DM

Dr. Kermit Harvey, DDM 

Ms. Cheryl Henry, DDM 

Dr. Erin Moses, DDM/FLS

SEIAO 

DCS 

 DVMS 

CSI at Est. M45607 

FO/Quarterly Reports

(b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6)
#### David C. CORSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul A. MATTOX, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, WV Department of Transportation; Roger Propst, Superintendent of Schools, Calhoun County Board of Education, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-2137.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 25, 2011.

David C. Corson, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Wyant, Bailey & Wyant, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia; Jeffery D. Tay*690lor, Rose Padden *&*Petty, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David C. Corson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Corson v. Mattox,*No. 1:09-cv-00065-IMK-JSK, 2010 WL 3855187 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
NO. 12-17-00097-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

REXIE ROY MCMULLEN, III, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 159TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Rexie Roy McMullen, III, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The 

motion is signed by Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered May 24, 2017.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 24, 2017

NO. 12-17-00097-CR

REXIE ROY MCMULLEN, III,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 159th District Court 

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2015-0063)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
United States Department of Agriculture 

Nicaragua - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Meat to the United States 

February 8, 2024 

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*) 

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted 

1 Ganaderia Integral Nicaragua S.A. (GINSA) 05/06/2015 

2 Novaterra S.A. 12/16/2005 

4 Industrial Comercial San Martin S.A. 01/16/2002 

5 Nuevo Carnic S.A. 01/16/2002 

8 Matadero Central S.A. (MACESA) 01/16/2002 

109 Nica Beef Packers S.A. 05/18/2021 

Page 1 of 1
2009-1493.

#### State v. Gresham.

Montgomery App. No. 22766, 2009-Ohio-3305. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, *State v. Bodyke,*Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of One Stop Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve Cooper, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  March 21, 2018 |   | By:    | /s/ Steve Cooper                                                          |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |   |   | Steve Cooper                                                                   |
|                            |   |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

(Principal Executive Officer) |
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*November 4, 2009*

[Cite as *11/04/2009 Case Announcements,*2009-Ohio-5704.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2009-1513.

#### State ex rel. Foster v. Smith.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.