alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         483,011
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,596,132
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,295,721
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        10,305,609
<LOANS>                                     79,058,874
<ALLOWANCE>                                    295,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,150,246
<DEPOSITS>                                  77,123,181
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,212,101
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,151,579
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,663,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              96,150,246
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,969,223
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              423,465
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               146,521
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,539,209
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,800,031
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,946,294
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,592,915
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   62,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,787,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                851,050
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     551,789
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   551,789
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    533,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               232,867
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              295,367
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           295,367
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(b)
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Herman F. Dick, Jr.Herman F. Dick, Jr.Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Anthony RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10551

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 15, 2011.

Jeffrey Robert Haag, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Reynolds Biggs, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Michael Lowell King, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Michael Anthony Rodriguez, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Anthony Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Country NetWeightPresented Percent Cumulative

CANADA 1,556,279,881 36.55% 36.55%

AUSTRALIA 760,355,793 17.86% 54.41%

MEXICO 578,502,447 13.59% 68.00%

NEW ZEALAND 366,335,848 8.60% 76.61%

VIETNAM 193,059,763 4.53% 81.14%

NICARAGUA 136,523,139 3.21% 84.35%

POLAND 127,484,017 2.99% 87.34%

CHILE 115,235,824 2.71% 90.05%

BRAZIL 112,062,842 2.63% 92.68%

URUGUAY 91,580,260 2.15% 94.83%

DENMARK 61,920,200 1.45% 96.29%

ITALY 25,040,917 0.59% 96.88%

SPAIN 22,132,503 0.52% 97.40%

IRELAND 19,752,161 0.46% 97.86%

UNITED KINGDOM 19,111,490 0.45% 98.31%

COSTA RICA 17,471,638 0.41% 98.72%

NETHERLANDS 16,711,590 0.39% 99.11%

 CHINA 11,461,682 0.27% 99.38%

GERMANY 6,105,750 0.14% 99.52%

NORTHERN IRELAND 5,711,806 0.13% 99.66%

ARGENTINA 3,465,845 0.08% 99.74%

ISRAEL 2,954,966 0.07% 99.81%

HONDURAS 2,593,116 0.06% 99.87%

KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 1,623,836 0.04% 99.91%

FINLAND 979,821 0.02% 99.93%

JAPAN 977,710 0.02% 99.95%

HUNGARY 838,012 0.02% 99.97%

LITHUANIA 365,556 0.01% 99.98%

FRANCE 353,307 0.01% 99.99%

CROATIA 237,682 0.01% 100.00%

SAN MARINO 77,168 0.00% 100.00%

ICELAND 50,869 0.00% 100.00%

AUSTRIA 42,585 0.00% 100.00%

THAILAND 9,220 0.00% 100.00%

NAMIBIA 984 0.00% 100.00%

Total Presented 4,257,410,228 100.00%

United Kingdom includes England, Scotland and Wales - which are under one inspction system.

Northern Ireland is under a separate inspction system and is listed seperately.

These data are for meat and poultry imports. Egg product 

imports in 2019= 7,234,533 pounds. All egg product imports 

were from Canada and Netherlands.

2019 Import Data

Office of Field Operations 

Import Inspection Operations 

Food Safety and Inspection Service
Processing Course Acronym Listing

aw Water Activity

BLBT Boneless Lean Beef Tissue

BHA Butylated Hydroxyanisole

BHT Butylated Hydroxytoluene

CEDL Continuing Education and Distance Learning

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CFW Calculated Finished Weight

CSI Consumer Safety Inspector

CS Corn Syrup

CSS Corn Syrup Solids

DO District Office

EST Establishment

FDA Food and Drug Administration

FFDC Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic

FLS Frontline Supervisor

FMIA Federal Meat Inspection Act

FPS Finished Product Standard

FSIS Food Safety and Inspection Service

FSLPB Food Standards and Labeling Policy Book

GAD Gather, Assess, and Determine

GDL Glucono Delta-Lactone

GMP Good Manufacturing Practice

GRAS Generally Recognized as Safe

HRI Hotels, Restaurants, and Institutions

IPP Inspection Program Personnel

ISP Isolated Soy Protein

LFTB Lean Finely Textured Beef

LSAS Labeling Submission and Approval System

LOG Letter of Guarantee

LPDS Labeling and Program Delivery Staff

MAV Maximum Allowable Variation

MOI Memorandum of Interview

MPI Meat and Poultry Inspection

MPR Moisture Protein Ratio

MS Malt Syrup

MSG Monosodium Glutamate

MSKP Mechanically Separated (Kind) Poultry

MSP Mechanically Separated Pork

MSS Mechanically Separated Species

NFDM Non-Fat Dry Milk

NFSCP Non-Food Safety Consumer Protection

NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology

NOIE Notice of Intended Enforcement

NR Noncompliance Record
NRLTO Not Reasonably Likely to Occur

NRTE Not Ready to Eat

OCP Other Consumer Protection

OFO Office of Field Operation

OIEA Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit

OPPD Office Program Policy Division

PDCB Partially Defatted Chopped Beef

PDBFT Partially Defatted Beef Fatty Tissue

PDPFT Partially Defatted Pork Fatty Tissue

PDS Policy Development Staff

PFF Protein Fat Free

PFW Projected Finished Weight

PHIS Public Health Information System

PM Policy Memorandum 

PPIA Poultry Products Inspection Act

PPM Parts Per Million

PRP Pre-Requisite Program

QA Quality Assurance

QC Quality Control

RCA Regulatory Control Action

RI Restricted Ingredients 

RIMS Risk Innovations Management Staff

RLTO Reasonably Likely to Occur

ROP Rules of Practice

RTE Ready to Eat

RTE/SS Ready to Eat/Shelf Stable

TBQH Tertiary Butylhydroquinone

SAPP Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

USC United States Code

USDA United States Department of Agriculture
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Cases Tagged with Clothing and Textiles No results found for this tag.
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00218-CR

Carlos Garcia

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

428th District Court of Hays County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-16-0668

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 28, 2019
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 20

- 3469

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Elmer Lee Wells, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________

Submitted: May 5, 2021 Filed: May 10, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________

Before COL LOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Elmer Wells, Jr.

, appeals a within

- Guidelines

- range sentence of 21 month s in prison for violating the conditions of supervised release. He challenges the
substantive reasonableness of the sentence, and his attorney seeks permission to
withdraw

.-2- We conclude that Wells’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United
States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) ( reviewing the reasonableness of
a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion ); United States v. Perkins , 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (stating that a within

- Guidelines

- range sentence is presumptively reasonable). The record establishes that the district court 1 sufficiently considered the statutory sente ncing factors, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Larison , 432 F.3d 921, 923

– 24 (8th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel permiss ion to withdraw.

______________________________

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hector LIMA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10927

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 15, 2011.

Susan Cowger, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Blake Ross, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Hector Lima, Forrest City, AR, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Hector Lima has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lima has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
#### Lorenzo Eulogio MORALES; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73101.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Jorge I. Rodriguez-Choi, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Virginia Lum, Anthony W. Norwood, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Margaret A. O’Donnell, Esq., U.S. DOJ-Office of Enforcement Operations Criminal Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*669Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lorenzo Eulogio Morales, Ana Del Carmen Olcese Panduro, and Lorenzo Andre Morales Olcese, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review from the denial of asylum. Because the Board of Immigration Appeals adopted the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision, we review the IJ’s decision for substantial evidence, and we deny the petition. *See Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that the unfulfilled threats of the Shining Path guerillas described by Morales did not establish past persecution. *See Lim v. INS,*224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir.2000). In addition, we conclude that the IJ properly found that Morales has not shown a well-founded fear of future persecution.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1192

_____________________________

CHLOE P. JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John T. Brown, Judge.

July 26, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Glenn M. Swiatek, Shalimar, for Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
##### 



Exhibit 10.176 Compensatory Arrangements with Certain
Executive Officers and Directors Set forth below are the base salaries of the named executive officers of Mace Security
International, Inc. for the fiscal year as well
as the discretionary cash bonuses they were paid for performance in 2004: Name
    
    Office
    
    Fiscal 2005 Salary
    
    Cash BonusLouis D. Paolino, Jr.
    
    President, Chief
Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
    
    $
    400,000
    
    
    $
    200,000Robert M. Kramer
    
    Chief Operating Officer
of the Car and Truck Wash
Segment, Executive Vice
President, General Counsel
and Secretary
    
    $
    210,000
    
    
    $
    Gregory M. Krzemien
    
    Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
    
    $
    200,000
    
    
    $
    Ronald R. Pirollo
    
    Chief Accounting Officer
and Corporate Controller
    
    $
    160,000
    
    
    $
    
 The cash compensation for Independent Directors is (a) an annual fee of $4,000, prorated for
partial years of service, (b) a $750 fee
for in-person attendance at each Board meeting, and (c) a $300 fee for in-person attendance at each
committee meeting. Additionally,
from time to time, the Board has awarded all directors stock options for service on the Board.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2591

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt services performed

by full-time students for seasonal children’s camps from social security taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 1, 1993

Mrs. KENNELLY (for herself and Mr. PICKLE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt

services performed by full-time students for seasonal children’s camps from social security taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subsection (b) of section 3121 of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining employment) is amended

5 by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (19), by striking

6 the period at the end of paragraph (20) and inserting ‘‘;

7 or’’, and by adding at the end thereof the following new

8 paragraph:
2

•HR 2591 IH

1 ‘‘(21) service performed by a full time student

2 (as defined in section 3306(q)) in the employ of an

3 organized children’s camp—

4 ‘‘(A) if such camp—

5 ‘‘(i) did not operate for more than 7

6 months in the calendar year and did not

7 operate for more than 7 months in the pre8 ceding calendar year, or

9 ‘‘(ii) had average gross receipts for

10 any 6 months in the preceding calendar

year which were not more than 331 11 ⁄3 per12 cent of its average gross receipts for the

13 other 6 months in the preceding calendar

14 year, and

15 ‘‘(B) if such full time student performed

16 services in the employ of such camp for less

17 than 13 calendar weeks in such calendar year.’’

18 (b) Subsection (a) of section 210 of the Social Secu19 rity Act is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of para20 graph (19), by striking the period at the end of paragraph

21 (20) and inserting ‘‘; or’’, and by adding at the end thereof

22 the following new paragraph:

23 ‘‘(21) Service performed by a full time student

24 (as defined in section 3306(q) of the Internal Reve-
3

•HR 2591 IH

1 nue Code of 1986) in the employ of an organized

2 children’s camp—

3 ‘‘(A) if such camp—

4 ‘‘(i) did not operate for more than 7

5 months in the calendar year and did not

6 operate for more than 7 months in the pre7 ceding calendar year, or

8 ‘‘(ii) had average gross receipts for

9 any 6 months in the preceding calendar

year which were not more than 331 10 ⁄3 per11 cent of its average gross receipts for the

12 other 6 months in the preceding calendar

13 year, and

14 ‘‘(B) if such full time student performed

15 services in the employ of such camp for less

16 than 13 calendar weeks in such calendar year.’’

17 (c) The amendments made by this section shall apply

18 to remuneration paid after December 31, 1993.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-153231
and Form S-3 No. 333-161300) of GT Solar International, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our report dated June 4, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of GT Solar International, Inc. and
subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of GT Solar International, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2010.   /s/ Ernst &
  Young LLPBoston, MassachusettsJune 4, 2010