alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed January 6, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

Nos. 11-21-00145-CR & 11-21-00200-CR

__________

DANIEL RAY GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 106th District Court

Gaines County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 19-5086 & 16-4669 

O R D E R

We have reviewed the “Motion to Recuse the Justices of the 11th Court of 

Appeals” filed in this cause on December 15, 2021, as it pertains to seeking the 

recusal of Justice W. Stacy Trotter. Pursuant to Rule 16.3(b) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, Justice Trotter has considered the motion in chambers. 

Justice Trotter has found no reason to recuse himself and, pursuant to Rule 16.3(b), 

has certified the issue to the entire court for a determination by the other justices of 
2

this court.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 16.3(b). Chief Justice John M. Bailey and Justice 

W. Bruce Williams have decided the matter without Justice Trotter’s participation.

The recusal of appellate judges is controlled by Rule 16 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. The grounds for recusal of an appellate court justice are

provided in the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. TEX. R. APP. P. 16.2; see TEX. R.

CIV. P. 18b. We find no reason for Justice Trotter to recuse himself and hold that 

none of the grounds set out in Rule 18b are applicable to Justice Trotter in this case. 

See TEX. R. CIV. P. 18b; see also Manges v. Guerra, 673 S.W.2d 180, 185 (Tex. 

1984); McCullough v. Kitzman, 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001, pet. 

denied).

The request for the recusal of Justice W. Stacy Trotter is denied.

PER CURIAM

January 6, 2022

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

and Williams, J.

Trotter, J., not participating. 

1

A copy of Justice Trotter’s written certification is attached to this order.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2677

AN ACT

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsoral History building. the West Court of the National Museum of Natu- nian Institution to plan, design, and construct
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2677

AN ACT

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, and construct the West Court

of the National Museum of Natural History building.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF

4 WEST COURT OF NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NAT5 URAL HISTORY BUILDING.

6 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution

7 is authorized to plan, design, and construct the West

8 Court of the National Museum of Natural History build9 ing.
2

•HR 2677 EH

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING.

2 No appropriated funds may be used to pay any ex3 pense of the planning, design, and construction authorized

4 by section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
[No. 58158-9-I.

Division One.

September 17, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ronald Darrell Smith, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-1-10175-6, Richard A. Jones, J., entered April 10, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XVI, Ltd. at December 31, 1997, and its statement of
income for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10K of CNL Income Fund XVI, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,301,768<F2>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                       879
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      32,096,437
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,437,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,938,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,904,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,938,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,382,487
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  836,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,660,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,660,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,660,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F2>Cash balance includes $627,899 in restricted cash.
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XVI, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2824 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2824

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To modify the project for flood control, James River Basin, Richmond, 
                               Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES RIVER BASIN, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood control, James River Basin, Richmond, 
Virginia, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4126) is modified to authorize the 
Secretary of the Army to construct the project at a total cost of 
$134,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $100,500,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $33,500,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

s1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147779

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147779

COA: 313545

Wayne CC: 08

- 012323

- FC

DOYLE WILLIAM PALMER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5

, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
II 

Calendar No. 658 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2876 

[Report No. 115–371] 

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for the study of the 

Pike National Historic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2018 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 15, 2018 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for 

the study of the Pike National Historic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pike National Historic 

5 Trail Study Act’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2876 RS

1 SEC. 2. WESTERN STATES TRAIL STUDY. 

2 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

3 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(46) PIKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.—The 

6 Pike National Historic Trail, a series of routes ex7 tending approximately 3,664 miles, which follows the 

8 route taken by Lt. Zebulon Montgomery Pike during 

9 the 1806–1807 Pike expedition that began in Fort 

10 Bellefontaine, Missouri, extended through portions 

11 of the States of Kansas, Nebraska, Colorado, New 

12 Mexico, and Texas, and ended in Natchitoches, Lou13 isiana.’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 658 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2876 

[Report No. 115–371] 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to proTrail. vide for the study of the Pike National Historic 

NOVEMBER 15, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Order entered April 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01469-CR

No. 05-17-01470-CR

VICTORIA IFEANYI ANWUZIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. CR16-0886 & CR16-0887

ORDER

Appellant timely filed pro se notices of appeal of the trial court’s November 29, 2017 

judgments. Because the record did not reflect that appellate counsel had been appointed, we 

abated these cases for a hearing to determine whether appellant was indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel. The trial court held a hearing and made findings of fact and 

recommendations. We adopted the trial court’s findings that appellant: is not indigent; has not 

retained counsel and does not wish to be represented by counsel; has been advised of the dangers 

and disadvantages of self-representation; was adamant in preparing her own defense on appeal;

and was informed she would be required to request and pay for the preparation of the clerk’s 

records and the reporter’s record in these appeals.
When the court reporter informed us that appellant had not paid or made arrangements to 

pay for the reporter’s record, we directed appellant to provide written verification by February 

10, 2018 that she had paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. We cautioned 

appellant that the failure to do so might result in the Court ordering the appeals submitted 

without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellant did not respond, and the 

reporter’s record was not filed. We then ordered the appeals submitted without a reporter’s 

record and ordered appellant’s brief filed by March 22, 2018. 

No brief was filed. We notified appellant by postcard dated March 26, 2018, instructing 

her to file her brief and an extension motion no later than April 5, 2018. To date, no brief has 

been filed and we have had no communication from appellant.

 We ORDER appellant to file her brief by 5:00 p.m. on APRIL 27, 2018. If appellant 

fails to file her brief by 5:00 p.m. on April 27, 2018, the Court will order her appeals submitted 

without a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(4); Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1994).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order (1) by certified mail, return receipt 

requested, to Victoria Anwuzia, P.O. Box 861535, Plano, Texas 75086, and (2) by electronic 

transmission to the Rockwall County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
2009-1748.

#### State v. Williams.

Cuyahoga App. No. 93607. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5081]



[[Page 13088]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,311]


LIGHTNIN--SPX Corporation, Wytheville, Virginia; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on November 13, 2000, in response to a petition filed by 
a company official on behalf of workers at LIGHTNIN Division, SPX 
Corporation, Wytheville, Virginia.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, 
and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 30th day of January 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-5081 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned office of Rim Semiconductor Company (the "Company"), do hereby
certify that to such officer's knowledge:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the period ended
January 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

This certification is made solely for the purposes of U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.

July 10, 2006


/S/ BRAD KETCH
--------------------------------------
BRAD KETCH
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the Company ) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott F. Hartman, Chairman of the Board, Secretary and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Scott F. Hartman                                                      
|Scott F. Hartman Chairman of the Board, Secretary and Chief Executive Officer



May 5, 2003



This certification
is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Pacific Office Properties Trust,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Dallas E. Lucas, President and Chief Executive Officer, and
James M. Kasim, Chief Financial Officer, each certify, to the best of their knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2008

/s/ Dallas E. LucasDallas E. LucasChief Executive Officer, President/s/ James M. KasimJames M. KasimChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-44897, No. 333-82572 and No 333-98997) of our report dated February 4, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Monterey Gourmet Foods, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |
| San Francisco, California |
| March 24, 2005       |

 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,641,658
<SECURITIES>                                   695,528
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,337,186
<PP&E>                                      12,576,249
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,890,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,913,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,289
<BONDS>                                         29,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,790,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,913,435
<SALES>                                      1,222,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,801,976
<CGS>                                          158,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               533,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,109,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,109,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,109,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    75.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    75.56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of The Parkview Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bert L. Gusrae, Treasurer
of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.

|                                         | 
|---------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Bert L.
 Gusrae                      | 
|                                         | 
|Bert L.
 Gusrae                          | 
|Treasurer
 (Principal Financial Officer) | 
|                                         | 
|May 21, 2009                             | 

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF METRO INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. AS PRESENTED IN THE
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS' LEGEND.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                       906
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,830
<PP&E>                                          19,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,296
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           151
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,483
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,197
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                       792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,163
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>