alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                   ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
J. McKelvey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 4, 2006                           Michael J. McKelvey
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Michael J. McKelvey,
                                                President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer

This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARNELL FOSTER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 54 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of June, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err by ignoring the governing statute and due process protections that permit revocation only for a violation of specified conditions of probation, and by holding that [Petitioner’s] inappropriate offensive social media posting, that violated no condition of probation, warranted revocation?
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John A. JETTER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-2118.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 9, 2007.

Filed: April 17, 2007.

Clifford R. Cronk, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Davenport, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John P. Messina, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Iowa, Des Moines, IA, Kevin Ray Cmelik, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Davenport, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.

John A. Jetter, Newton, IA, pro se.

Before MURPHY, BRIGHT, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

*507PER CURIAM.

John Jetter appeals the 54 month sentence imposed by the district court1 upon revocation of his supervised release. We *affirm.*

Jetter originally pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (a Class A felony). Because of his substantial assistance to the government the district court departed *from*a mandatory life term of imprisonment and sentenced him in February 1998 to 132 months in prison and 10 years of supervised release. *See*21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (minimum life term if two or more prior convictions for felony drug offense); 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(1) (offense classification). Jetter began serving his initial term of supervised release in July 2004. It was revoked in December 2004, and the district court thereafter imposed a sentence of 6 months in prison and 115 months of supervised release. He began serving that term of supervised release in June 2005, and in December 2005 he was arrested in connection with domestic abuse. At his revocation hearing Jetter admitted violating two of the conditions of his supervised release by using drugs and possessing a device designed to subvert drug testing, and the district court found he had also committed domestic assault in violation of a third condition. The court revoked his supervised release, and although the recommended guideline range was 5 to 11 months, the court sentenced Jetter to 54 months, the maximum sentence permitted in light of the 6 months served on his earlier revocation. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (5 year maximum revocation sentence if underlying offense was Class A felony). Jetter argues that his sentence was unreasonable.

The sentence was within the statutory limits and was based upon the district court’s consideration of Jetter’s history on supervised release and other appropriate factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *See United States v. Tyson,*413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). We conclude that the 54 month revocation sentence was not unreasonable and therefore not an abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Larison,*432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th Cir.2006) (60 month sentence no abuse of discretion with multiple violations and 5-11 month recommendation; court must consider all relevant § 3553(a) factors but need not make specific findings on each).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

          I,Richard B. Frost, certify that:

          1.     Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of The Parkview Group, Inc.;

          2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

          4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

                    (a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

                    (b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

                    (c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (thefourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

          5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                    (a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

                    (b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
2009-1086.

#### Gildersleeve v. State.

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 91515, 91516, 91517, 91518, 91519, 91521, 91522, 91523, 91524, 91525, 91526, 91527, 91528, 91529, 91530, 91531, and 91532, 2009-Ohio-2031. Discretionary appeal accepted; appeal held for the decision in 2008-2502, *State v. Bodyke,*Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed as to the appeal.

Discretionary cross-appeal accepted. Briefing on the cross-appeal shall proceed in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.
| Commercial        Loans Mortgage        LoansREOJudgmentsSecuritiesOther AssetsEquity in SubsDeficiencies16.1%    28.7%6.9%3.4%8.0%9.2%23.0%4.6%
                      Source: Reports from FDIC Division of Finance

Back to Chart
 19921993199419951996Other4,621    4,5844,4624,1114,760Liquidation6,4275,6653,7963,0551,819    Supervision    3,9963,9713,3692,6232,572    RTC    7,3826,7785,8992,067Total22,42620,99817,52611,8569,151

                      Source: FDIC, 2002 Annual Report

Back          to Chart |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 21.1**

West Marine, Inc. and its subsidiaries do business under the following names: West Marine Products, West Marine, BoatU.S. and Port Supply.The following is a list of the subsidiaries of West Marine, Inc., including the state of incorporation or jurisdiction of organization of each subsidiary: 

West Marine Products, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine Puerto Rico,Inc., a California corporation 

W Marine Management Company, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine Canada Corp., a Nova Scotia unlimited liability company 

The following subsidiaries were merged into West Marine Products, Inc. by statutory merger, effective as of January 2, 2009:

West Marine LBC, Inc., a California corporation 

West Marine IHC I, Inc., a California corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XVI,  ltd. at December 31, 1998,  and its  statement of
income for the year then ended and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-K of CNL Income Fund XVI, Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,603,589
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                   89,822
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         32,157,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,942,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 40,188,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,191,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,188,641
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,961,754
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  850,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,976,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,976,998
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,976,998
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund XVI,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Louis D. Paolino, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mace Security
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: September 24, 2004

/s/ Louis D. Paolino, Jr.
_________________________________
Name: Louis D. Paolino, Jr.
Title: Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2796

Relating to the tariff treatment of certain footwear.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1993

Mr. PAXON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

Relating to the tariff treatment of certain footwear.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TARIFF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN FOOTWEAR.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of

5 the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law, upon

6 proper request filed with the appropriate customs officer

7 within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act,

8 any entry—

9 (1) that was made after December 31, 1988,

10 and before July 1, 1991;

11 (2) that consisted of articles of footwear that,

12 if entered on July 1, 1991, would have been classi-
2

•HR 2796 IH

1 fied under subheading 9905.64.10 of the Har2 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States; and

3 (3) with respect to which there would have been

4 a lesser duty if the applicable rate applied to such

5 entry;

6 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though the applicable

7 rate applied to such entry.

8 (b) APPLICABLE RATE.—For purposes of subsection

9 (a), the term ‘‘applicable rate’’ means—

10 (1) 4.7% ad valorem if the entry was made

11 after December 31, 1988, and before January 1,

12 1990;

13 (2) 4.2% ad valorem if the entry was made

14 after December 31, 1989, and before January 1,

15 1991; and

16 (3) 3.7% ad valorem if the entry was made

17 after December 30, 1990, and before July 1, 1991.

18 (c) ENTRY DEFINED.—For purposes of this section,

19 the term ‘‘entry’’ includes a withdrawal from warehouse

20 for consumption.

Æ
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2665

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade and fisheries for the vessel COMPASS ROSE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15, 1993

Mr. EDWARDS of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries

for the vessel COMPASS ROSE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of

6 title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 2665 IH

1 trade and fisheries for the vessel COMPASS ROSE (offi2 cial number 695865).

Æ
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Annual Report of Nurse Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Tomasz Zurawek, President/CEO/CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Tomasz Zurawek Tomasz Zurawek, President, CEO, CFO Dated:  March 21, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

[I.D. 022001B]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA).
    Title: NOAA Space-Based Data Collection System (DCS) Agreements.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0157.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 440.
    Number of Respondents: 390.
    Average Hours Per Response: 3 hours for a GOES use agreement, 1 
hour for an Argos use agreement.
    Needs and Uses: NOAA operates two space-based data collection 
systems (DCS): the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 
(GOES) DCS and the Argos DSC flown on polar-orbiting satellites. NOAA 
allows users access to the DCS if they meet certain criteria. 
Applicants must submit information to ensure they meet these criteria. 
NOAA does not approve agreements when commercial services are available 
that can fulfill users' requirements.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions, business or other 
for-profit organizations, individuals, and state, local, or tribal 
government.
    Frequency: 3-5 years.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Madeleine Clayton, Departmental Forms Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-3129, Department of Commerce, Room 6086, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f8b5bb9499818c9796b89c979bd69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b5658777a626f74755b7f7478357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
Madeleine Clayton,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4691 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-HR-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>