alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3.2.3 - Certificate  of Amendment of the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of the
Company filed on May 14, 1999.

                           Certificate of Amendment of
                         Certificate of Incorporation of
                            U.S. Wireless Corporation


         Under Section 242 of the Delaware Corporation Law:

         The  Undersigned,  for the  purpose  of  amending  the  Certificate  of
Incorporation of U.S. Wireless Corporation, does hereby certify and set forth:

     FIRST: The name of the Corporation is: U.S. WIRELESS CORPORATION

     SECOND:  The  Certificate of  Incorporation  was filed by the Department of
State on 12th day of February, 1993.

     THIRD: The amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
effected  by  this  Certificate  of  Amendment  is to  increase  the  number  of
authorized  shares of the Company's Series B Preferred Stock,  amending "Article
Fourth,  Subarticle  (D)(i)" so that, as amended,  said Subarticle shall read as
follows:

     (D) Series B Preferred Stock.

     (i)  Designation.  The designation of this series of Preferred  Stock,  par
value $0.01 per share,  shall be the  "Series B Preferred  Stock." The number of
shares of Series B Preferred Stock authorized hereby shall be 60,000 shares.

     FOURTH:  The amendment to the Articles of  Incorporation of the Corporation
set forth above was approved by vote of all the Corporation's Series B Preferred
Stockholders on the 6th day of April, 1999.

     IN WITNESS  WHEROF,  the  undersigned  President  of this  Corporation  has
executed this Certificate of Amendment on this 11th day of May, 1999.

                                    U.S. WIRELESS CORPORATION


                           By:      s\s Dr. Oliver Hilsenrath
                                    Dr. Oliver Hilsenrath, President


                                        4
|  | 1. | The Company’s Form 10-K for the      fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      | /s/      Xiaoqun Ye                |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Date:      March 31, 2009 | Xiaoqun      Ye                    |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                      | (Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                      |                               |
|                      | /s/      Yan Lin                   |
| Date:      March 31, 2009 | Yan      Lin                       |
|                      | Chief      Accounting Officer      |
|                      | (Principal      FinancialOfficer)  |

----
#### The State (Peter Bentley and others, Prosecutors), *vs.*Earl B. Sippel, Collector in Jersey City.

Where a license is given to owners of land lying on a navigable stream to wharf out below high water mark, so far as the grant extends the property is vested in the grantees, and is liable to taxation.

*Certiorari*in matter of taxation.

This case was argued and decided with the preceding one, the questions arising in it being nearly the same.

Elmer, J.

This case differs from that in which Marshall O. Roberts and others are prosecutors only in the facts, that a considerable part of the land covered with water is within the grant from the state to Nathaniel Budd, and the prosecutors have obtained a license to wharf out within certain limits. So far as the grant extends, I am of opinion the property was vested in the prosecutors, and they were rightly taxed with its value for that reason. And for the reasons given in the other case, I am of opinion that the taxes for county and city purposes should be affirmed as they stand. The water tax for all the property covered with water is erroneous, and must be set aside.

The Chief Justice, and Justices Ogden and Haines, concurred.

Cited in *State*v. *Haight Coll.,*6 *Vr.*181.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo PEREZ-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30310.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 9, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 22, 2007.

Baron C. Sheldahl, Esq, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert A. Weppner, Law Offices, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: THOMPSON and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and MILLS **, District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Arturo Perez-Morales (“Appellant”) appeals his conviction and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). The facts and procedural history are familiar to the parties, and we do not repeat them here.

Appellant’s conviction challenge rests on his assertion that his plea was not knowing and intelligent because he was not advised that the government would have to prove the existence of his prior aggravated felony convictions to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt to render him eligible for an enhanced sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Because at trial the government would have had no such obligation, however, Appellant’s argument is without merit. *See, e.g., Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) *(“Other than the fact of a prior conviction,*any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (emphasis added)); *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 *546U.S. 224, 247, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998).

Appellant’s second claim is that his sentence is unreasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 because the district court failed to adequately consider non-Guidelines sentencing factors, gave the advisory Guidelines sentencing range undue weight, and rejected a lower sentence on the basis of Appellant’s previous convictions. Because the weight the district court should have accorded the Guidelines and the extent to which it should have considered the non-Guidelines factors is currently before the United States Supreme Court, *see United States v. Claiborne,*439 F.3d 479 (8th Cir.2006), ce*rt. granted,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 551, 166 L.Ed.2d 406 (2006); *United States v. Rita,*177 Fed.Appx. 357 (4th Cir.2006), *cert. granted*, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 551, 166 L.Ed.2d 406 (2006), and an en banc panel of this Court, *see United States v. Carty,*No. 05-10200; *United States v. Zavala,*No. 05-30120, we defer consideration of this issue until those cases are resolved.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM in part and DEFER in part. The issuance of the mandate shall be stayed pending *Claiborne*and *Rita.*

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2007-6
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-6


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted

LT6809EB UAB “Baltic Egg Production” 09/15/2022

May 22, 2023

Lithuania - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Egg Products to the United States

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*)
13050 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2001 / Notices

event that consumers encounter

difficulties in making electronic

transmissions?

Kathy D. Smith,

Chief Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01–5053 Filed 3–1–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–60–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY

COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety

Commission.

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 7,

2001, 2:30 p.m.

LOCATION: Room 410, East West Towers,

4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,

Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public—Pursuant

to 5 U.S.C. 5532(f)(1) and 16 CFR

1013.4(b) (3) (7) (9) and (10) and

submitted to the Federal Register

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Status Report

The staff will brief the Commission on

the status of various compliance

matters.

For a recorded message containing the

latest agenda information, call (301)

504–0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of

the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway,

Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504–0800.

Dated: February 26, 2001.

Sadye E. Dunn,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–5212 Filed 2–28–01; 10:03 am]

BILLING CODE 6355–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01–02]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation

Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Pub. Law

104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, and Transmittal 01–02

with attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: February 26, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M
| **Other Deductions - Net - Additional Information about Intangible Assets (Parenthetical) (Detail) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Mar. 31, 2013 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| **Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]**                                                          |          |
| Intangible assets, fair value                                                                                                                       | $ 564         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
This element represents intangible assets fair value disclosure.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pfe_IntangibleAssetsFairValueDisclosure**Namespace Prefix:**pfe_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_FairValueAssetsAndLiabilitiesMeasuredOnRecurringAndNonrecurringBasisValuationTechniquesLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### ERICA TODD *v.*NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

*Miles N. Esty,*in support of the petition.

Decided July 22, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 597 (AC 31041), is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                     49,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,842
<PP&E>                                         346,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 450,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,868
<BONDS>                                         59,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,053
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   450,362
<SALES>                                        147,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,251
<CGS>                                          110,076
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 471
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                     408
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,707
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rodney E. Schwatken, Vice President, Treasurer and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/    RODNEY E. SCHWATKEN   
|-----------------------------
|Rodney E. Schwatken          
|Vice President, Treasurer and
|Controller                   
|(Principal Financial Officer)



August 6, 2003



This certification is made solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

December 1, 2015

Hon. Arturo Guajardo Jr.

Hidalgo County Clerk

P. O. Box 58

Edinburg, TX 78540

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00168-CV

Tr.Ct.No. CL-14-3875-F

Style: Joe Ernest Lugo, Individually and Loving Touch Adult Daycare, Inc. v. Irene 

Garza

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was DISMISSED by this Court on the 

22nd day of October, 2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Costs of the appeal were adjudged against appellant, Joe Ernest Lugo, Individually and 

Loving Touch Adult Daycare, Inc.

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code, the attorneys of record are 

hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that 

party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be 

destroyed three (3) years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the 

Court.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Sarah Dionne (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Jose Carlos Macias (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/ David Bychkov         |   |
|--------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|               |   | David Bychkov             |   |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|               |   | (Chief executive officer) |   |
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-158097 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-144315 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 28, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of MarketHub Partners Holding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spectra Energy Partners, LP for the year ended December 31,2010. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Houston, Texas 

February 28, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                          19,407
<SECURITIES>                                    34,597
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,537
<PP&E>                                          44,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,294
<BONDS>                                          6,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           151
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,411
<SALES>                                         49,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,057
<CGS>                                           25,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (667)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,170)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,424)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,746)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit10.34**

 

Description of Severance Agreement provisionsbetween Boston Biomedica, Inc. and Richard D’Allessandro, Vice President –Information Technology, contained in an internal Boston Biomedica, inc.memorandum dated March 21, 2001 between Kevin Quinlan, President and ChiefOperating Officer of Boston Biomedica, Inc. and Richard D’Allessandro, VicePresident, Information Technology of Boston Biomedica, Inc.:

 

 

If Mr. D’Allessandro is terminated for any reason other than cause, theCompany commits that he will receive 3 weeks of severance for every completedyear of service.  This does not apply toa voluntary termination on Mr. D’Allessandro’s part.

 

1

----