alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Continuation of Libya Emergency

                        On January 7, 1986, by Executive Order 12543, President Reagan declared a national emergency to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government of Libya. On January 8, 1986, by Executive Order 12544, the President took additional measures to block Libyan assets in the United States. The President has transmitted a notice continuing this emergency to the Congress and the                         **Federal Register**                         every year since 1986.                    

The crisis between the United States and Libya that led to the declaration of a national emergency on January 7, 1986, has not been resolved. Despite the United Nations Security Council's suspension of U.N. sanctions against Libya upon the Libyan government's hand over of the Pan Am 103 bombing suspects, there are still concerns about the Libyan government's support for terrorist activities and its noncompliance with United Nations Security Council Resolutions 731 (1992), 748 (1992), and 883 (1993).

                        Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to Libya. This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 01-527

Billing code 3195-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Gregory M. Krzemien, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mace Security International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-l5(c)) for
the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; 5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summerize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 28, 2005 /s/ Gregory M. KrzemienGregory M. KrzemienChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 99.4


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Financial Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:





| | 1) |  | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 2, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 2, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    Philip W. Roizin





Philip W. Roizin


Executive Vice President, Finance


and Administration, Treasurer and


Secretary and Chief Financial Officer





Dated: December 17, 2002




1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4548]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-01-014]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Siesta Key Bridge (SR 758), 
Sarasota, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Siesta Key Bridge (SR 758) across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 
71.6, Sarasota County, Sarasota, Florida. This deviation allows the 
drawbridge owner or operator to only open one leaf of the drawbridge, 
from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m., on March 5, 2001 and March 6, 2001. This 
temporary deviation is required to allow the bridge owner to safely 
complete maintenance on the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 8 a.m. on March 5, 2001 until 5 
p.m. on March 6, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Siesta Key Bridge across the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway at Sarasota County, Sarasota, is a double leaf 
bridge with a vertical clearance of 21 feet above mean high water (MHW) 
measured at the fenders in the closed position with a horizontal 
clearance of 90 feet. On January 24, 2001, the Florida Department of 
Transportation, the drawbridge owner, requested a deviation from the 
current operating regulations in 33 CFR 117.287(b-1). These regulations 
require the draw to open on signal, except from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. 
daily, the draw need only open on the hour, 20 minutes past the hour, 
and 40 minutes past the hour. This temporary deviation was requested to 
allow necessary maintenance to the drawbridge in a critical time 
sensitive manner.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.287(b-1) for the purpose of 
maintenance on the drawbridge. Under this deviation, the Siesta Key 
Bridge need only open one leaf from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m., March 5, 2001 
and March 6, 2001.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Greg E. Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Administration, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-4548 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
2009-1464.

#### Cwik v. Corry.

Hamilton App. No. C-081052.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2767 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2767

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide veterans' preference 
 eligibility with respect to individuals who served on active duty in 
 the armed forces during the Persian Gulf War, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1993

  Mr. Bishop introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide veterans' preference 
 eligibility with respect to individuals who served on active duty in 
 the armed forces during the Persian Gulf War, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That (a) section 2108 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B)--
                            (i) by striking ``the date of enactment of 
                        the Veterans' Education and Employment 
                        Assistance Act of 1976,'' and inserting 
                        ``October 15, 1976,''; and
                            (ii) by adding ``or'' after the semicolon; 
                        and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the 
                following:
                    ``(C) served on active duty in the armed forces 
                during the Persian Gulf War as defined by section 
                101(33) of title 38, not including service under 
                section 511(d) of title 10 pursuant to an enlistment in 
                the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard or as 
                a Reserve for service in the Army Reserve, Naval 
                Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, or 
                Coast Guard Reserve;'';
            (2) in paragraph (3)(B) by inserting ``or (C)'' after 
        ``paragraph (1)(B)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
``A benefit afforded under this title by reason of an individual's 
meeting the definition of `preference eligible' under paragraph (3) 
shall be subject to the minimum active-duty service requirement under 
section 5303A(d) of title 38, if applicable.''.
    (b) Section 3309(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2108(3)(A)'' and inserting ``2108(3)(A)-(B)''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.1













**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Boulder Capital Opportunities II, Inc.
      (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Michael J. Delaney, Chief
      Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to section.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
                Company.









Date: August
        14, 2007        By:  /s/ Michael J.
        Delaney
 
 Chief
        Executive
        Officer
 Chief
        Financial
        Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN R. MCCOOL,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY CCP, CHARLES H. SAYLOR J, NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY ODA, ANTHONY "TONY" M. MATULEWICZ, III, DA, SNYDER COUNTY CCP, LOUISE O. KNIGHT J, SNYDER COUNTY ODA, MICHAEL F. J. PIECUCH, DA,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 16 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of March

, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Writ of

Mandamus and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DENIED

.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Chase  Packaging  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Allen McInnes  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Allen McInnes
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


November 9, 2004


                                                                        Page 12.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Purio Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:  March
31, 2010





By:        /s/
Daryl English


Daryl
English


President, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,


Principal
Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          87,841
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   22,959
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     847,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                958,436
<PP&E>                          98,682
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,060,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,357,884
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        114
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,297,002)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,060,768
<SALES>                         133,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                133,306
<CGS>                           128,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   252,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              24,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (272,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (272,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (272,060)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.02)



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Charles Joseph FORRISTEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6063.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 10, 2014.

BEFORE: SUTTON and COOK, Circuit Judges; MARBLEY, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

*376PER CURIAM.

Christopher Forristel appeals his 151-month, within-guidelines sentence for transporting child pornography. *See*18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1). We affirm.

Forristel pleaded guilty to the transportation charge, admitting that he downloaded 22 videos of child pornography on his laptop in his California residence and then moved—with his computer—to Kentucky.

At sentencing, the district court calculated a sentencing guidelines range of 151 to 188 months’ imprisonment, reflecting a base offense level of 22 for transportation convictions. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(a)(2). Forristel offered no challenge to this calculation, arguing that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors justified a sentence of 108 months, the bottom of the guidelines range for defendants convicted of *possessing*child pornography. *See*U.S.S.G. 2G2.2(a)(l). According to Forristel, though he technically transported child pornography, his conduct was “no worse than” possession because he never transported it for distribution purposes.

On appeal, Forristel argues that the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence in rejecting his request for a below-guidelines sentence. A presumption of reasonableness, however, applies to Forristel’s within-guidelines sentence, *see United States v. Overmyer,*663 F.3d 862, 864 (6th Cir.2011), and he fails to rebut that presumption. As the district court reasonably concluded, this is “not a case of just simple possession” because Forristel “transported [his] computer [containing child pornography] actively and willingly from one state to another.” (R. 51, Sentencing R. at 50-51.) Moreover, the “fact that the district court did not give the defendant the exact sentence he sought is not a cognizable basis to appeal.” *United States v. Jackson,*466 F.3d 537, 540 (6th Cir.2006).

We AFFIRM.
2009-1275.

#### Blauvelt v. Hamilton.

Butler App. No. CA2008-07-174, 2009-Ohio-2801.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent.
| Loans RE Mtges.InvestmentsOwned        AssetsCharge-offs SecuritiesOA/Judgments74.8%    8.7%2.9%2.9%2.9%1.0%6.8%
                      Source: Reports from FDIC Division of Finance

Back to Chart
 19801981198219831984Other594    6065976401118Liquidation46042977811532158    Supervision    25442359212920531800Total35983394350438465076

                      Source: FDIC, 1984 Annual Report

Back          to Chart |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc.,
      a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Edward H. Myles, Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:





(1)
        The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            */s/
                Edward H. Myles**Edward
                H. Myles*
              Senior
                Vice President of Finance & Chief Financial Officer and
                Treasurer
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 4.18
English Translation
  RECEIVABLES PLEDGE CONTRACT
 IN CONNECTION WITH
 CHINA
DEVELOPMENT BANK FOREIGN EXCHANGE LOAN
 Pledgor:
    
    Yingli Energy (China) Company LimitedPledgee:
    
    China Development Bank




---



##### 



Pledgor: Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited
 
 Pledgee: China Development Bank
 
 2




---



##### 



Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited No. 1300401212008510121
 ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS
 Receivables
  ARTICLE 2
SUBJECT OF PLEDGE
  ARTICLE 3
SCOPE OF GUARANTEE
    ARTICLE 4
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE PLEDGOR
  3




---



##### 



ARTICLE 5
THE OPENING AND MANAGEMENT
OF THE SPECIAL ACCOUNT FOR INCOMES
    ARTICLE 6
OBLIGATIONS OF THE PLEDGOR
   4




---



##### 



ARTICLE 7
REALIZATION OF PLEDGE RIGHT
    ARTICLE 8
BREACH OF CONTRACT LIABILITIES
    ARTICLE 9
MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION OF THE CONTRACT
  5




---



##### 



ARTICLE 10
REGISTRATION OF PLEDGE
  ARTICLE 11
SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTE
  ARTICLE 12
MISCELLANEOUS
  two four
 ARTICLE 13
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CONTRACT
   6




---



##### 



Pledgor:
    
    (Company Seal)Legal Representative
    
    (signature) /s/ Liansheng Miao(or Authorized Representative)
 (mm)(dd)
(yy)
  Pledgee
    
    (Special Seal for Contracts)Legal Representative
    
    (signature) /s/ Lihong Wang(or Authorized Representative)
 (mm)(dd)
(yy)
 7