alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 258 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 258

  Requiring the President to take retaliatory action against foreign 
   barriers and restrictions that unfairly limit United States trade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Neal of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Requiring the President to take retaliatory action against foreign 
   barriers and restrictions that unfairly limit United States trade.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, if the President decides, or if the 
Congress by concurrent resolution declares, that any foreign nation 
(including any foreign instrumentality) is applying any tariff or non-
tariff barrier (including any restriction on services) that is unduly 
burdening and restricting the foreign trade of the United States, the 
President shall take such action, and for such time, as is necessary or 
appropriate to obtain the elimination of that barrier. In applying this 
Act, the President shall--
            (1) to the extent practicable, apply a barrier--
                    (A) similar in kind to that applied by the foreign 
                nation against United States goods or services, and
                    (B) applicable to a product or service of that 
                nation that is like or similar to the product or 
                service of the United States to which that nation's 
                barrier applies; and
            (2) in circumstances where paragraph (1) cannot be applied, 
        take retaliatory action under this Act that affects goods or 
        services, or both, of the foreign country of a value equivalent 
        to the value of the United States goods or services being 
        adversely affected by the foreign barrier.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
                           Small Cap Strategies, Inc.
              Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Bryce Knight, certify that:

1.   I am the chief executive  officer and chief financial  officer of Small Cap
     Strategies, Inc.

2.   Attached  to this  certification  is Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended
     December 31, 2007, a periodic  report (the "periodic  report") filed by the
     issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the  Securities  and  Exchange Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act"),
     which contains financial statements.

3.   I hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies
          with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
          and
     o    The  information  in  the  periodic  report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the issuer for the periods presented.

April 14, 2008                            /s/ Bryce Knight
                                          ------------------
                                          Bryce Knight
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer







                                 Page 90 of 90
Exhibit



        Exhibit 10.1




April 29, 2020




Mr. J. Scott Kirby
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
233 South Wacker Drive, Dept. HQSEO
Chicago, IL  60601


Dear Scott,


At your request, the purpose of this letter is to extend your voluntary waiver of 100% of your base salary through year-end 2020.  Based on this request, the prior letter agreement among you, United Airlines Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and United Airlines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“United,” and together with the Company, the “Employers”), dated as of March 10, 2020 (the “Waiver Letter”), is hereby amended to reflect that the “Voluntary Period” of your salary waiver is now March 10, 2020 through December 31, 2020. 


The Employers recognize that certain benefits provided to our employees require payroll deduction to reflect the employee’s contributions toward the cost of such benefits. To the extent that you participate in such a benefit during 2020, United will determine an appropriate process so that an amount equivalent to your 2020 contribution requirements is attributed to you during 2020 so that an appropriate withholding equivalent can be recorded, as appropriate to comply with the terms of any such benefit program.  


By signing below, you agree that this letter agreement accurately reflects our mutual understanding with respect to your desire to extend your 100% salary waiver as described herein.


Very truly yours,


UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS, INC.


By: /s/ Kate Gebo                
Name:    Kate Gebo
Title:    Executive Vice President, 
Human Resources and Labor Relations


UNITED AIRLINES, INC.


By: /s/ Kate Gebo                
Name:    Kate Gebo
Title:    Executive Vice President,
     Human Resources and Labor Relations


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


/s/ J. Scott Kirby            
J. Scott Kirby
iiill 

Peer Review Plan 

Title of Review: Peer Review: 

Risk Profile for Salmonella 

Subtypes in Poultry Products Linked 

to Foodborne Illness 

[ X] Influential Scientific Information 

Agency: US Department of Agriculture, Food 

Safety and Inspection Service 

(USDA/FSIS) 

[ ] Highly Influential Scientific Assessment 

Agency Contact: Dr. Joanna Zablotsky Kufel, Director, Risk Assessment and Analytics Staff, Office of Public Health 

Science, USDA/FSIS 

Subject of Review: Independent peer review of the FSIS Risk Profile for Salmonella Subtypes in Poultry Products Linked 

to Foodborne Illness 

Purpose of Review: Peer review of the methodology (e.g., systematic review of the literature), supporting data, data 

analysis, and findings from the FSIS Risk Profile 

Type of Review: [ ] Panel Review [X ] Individual Reviewers 

[ ] Alternative Process (Briefly Explain): 

Timing of Review (Est.): Start: July 2022 End: August Completed: 

2022 

Number of Reviewers: [ ] 3 or less [X ] 4 to 10 [ ] More than 10 

Primary Disciplines/Types of Expertise Needed for Review: Quantitative microbiological risk assessment/dose-response 

modeling, Salmonella in poultry, food microbiology/predictive microbiology, genomics of Salmonella/epidemiology 

Reviewers selected by: [ ] Agency [ X ] Designated OutsideOrganization 

Organization’s Name: RTI International 

Opportunities for Public Comment? [X ] Yes [ ] No 

If yes, briefly state how and when these opportunities will be provided: 

How: Through the public comment period available with publication of new regulations in the Federal Register 

When: Fall 2022 

Peer Reviewers Provided with Public Comments? [ ] Yes [ X ] No 

Public Nominations Requested for Review Panel? [ ] Yes [X ] No 

Other:
[No. 35015-7-II.

Division Two.

September 5, 2007.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare*of B.R.S.H. et al. Dannie Higgins et al., *Appellants,*v. Jason Evans et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 00-3-02604-7, Brian M. Tollefson, J., entered June 9, 2006. *Reversed*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J. Now published at 141 Wn. App. 39.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 6, 2023
No. 04-22-00845-CR Lawrence Ray JACKSON , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR4080B Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant Lawrence Ray Jackson entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he pleaded nolo contendere to the charged offense. The trial court imposed a sentence on September 14, 2022 in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)(2). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id . The clerk’s record includes the written plea bargain agreement which includes a waiver of the right to appeal those matter that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial. See id. 25.2(d). The record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore order appellant to file a response, by January 26, 2023, establishing an amended certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d), 37.1. If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to show appellant has the right to appeal, appellant must request a supplemental record from the trial court clerk and file a copy of the request with this court. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond to this order within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed.We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further

order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1

       
   
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>             Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>               Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                          19,570
<SECURITIES>                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                  804,019      
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                      3,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               910,565
<PP&E>                         179,774           
<DEPRECIATION>                  93,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               1,085,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          664,431
<BONDS>                         87,517            
<COMMON>                       275,368       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0   
<OTHER-SE>                      57,971  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,085,288
<SALES>                        232,188           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               232,188
<CGS>                                0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  218,626   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              11,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 13,562       
<INCOME-TAX>                         0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                       0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0   
<CHANGES>                            0        
<NET-INCOME>                    10,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .003       
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .003

        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 10, 2015





PDC Energy, Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)








Delaware0-724695-2636730(State or other jurisdiction of(Commission(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)File Number)Identification Number)





1775 Sherman Street, Suite 3000


Denver, Colorado 80203


(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)





Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ( 303) 860-5800








Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---







Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





The following information is furnished pursuant to Item 2.02.





On August 10, 2015 , PDC Energy, Inc. issued a press release announcing its operating and financial results for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015 . A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the exhibit hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits


Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release dated August 10, 2015, announcing results for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015.











---




SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Date: August 10, 2015


PDC ENERGY, INC.By:/s/ Daniel W. AmidonDaniel W. AmidonSenior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary








---




EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release dated August 10, 2015, announcing results for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015.
SCHEDULE B 

(Form 965)

(January 2019)

Deferred Foreign Income Corporation’s Earnings and Profits (E&P)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

▶ Attach to Form 965.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form965 for instructions and the latest information.

▶ Complete for Deferred Foreign Income Corporations.

▶ List E&P Deficit Foreign Corporations in Schedule C. 

OMB No. 1545-0123

Name of person filing this return Identifying number

a Separate Category (Enter code—see instructions.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

b If code 901j is entered on line a, enter the country code for the sanctioned country (see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

Name of Deferred Foreign Income Corporation

(a)

EIN or Reference ID 

Number of the 

Foreign Corporation 

(see instructions)

(b)(1)

November 2, 2017 

Post-1986 E&P 

in Functional Currency

(b)(2)

Check box if 

Alternative 

Method for 

Calculating 

E&P Elected 

(see instructions)

(c)

November 2, 2017 

Post-1986 Previously Taxed E&P 

in Functional Currency 

(see instructions)

(d)

November 2, 2017 

Post-1986 E&P Attibutable to ECI 

in Functional Currency

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions. Cat. No. 71343C Schedule B (Form 965) (1-2019)
Schedule B (Form 965) (1-2019) Page 2

(e)

November 2, 2017 

Accumulated Post-1986 

Deferred Foreign Income 

in Functional Currency 

(column (b)(1) less columns (c) and (d))

(f)

December 31, 2017 

Post-1986 E&P 

in Functional Currency

(g)

December 31, 2017 

Post-1986 Previously Taxed E&P 

in Functional Currency 

(see instructions)

(h)

December 31, 2017 

Post-1986 E&P Attributable to ECI 

in Functional Currency

(i)

December 31, 2017 

Accumulated Post-1986 

Deferred Foreign Income 

in Functional Currency 

(column (f) less columns (g) and (h))

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Add schedules as needed. 

Schedule B (Form 965) (1-2019)
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Joseph Esposito, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
undersigned's knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2003
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 7, 2003                     Joseph Esposito
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Joseph Esposito,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
1

The Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3347

___________

Donna J. Bailey, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner *

Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: August 3, 2005

Filed: January 10, 2006

___________

Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Donna J. Bailey appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the denial of

disability insurance benefits. Bailey alleged disability since October 2002 from neck,

shoulder, back, hip, and leg problems. After a hearing, an administrative law judge

(ALJ) determined that (1) Bailey had degenerative disc disease, lumbar radiculopathy,

mechanical neck pain, and some minor/acute problems; (2) her impairments were not
-2-

of listing-level severity alone or combined; (3) her alleged limitations were not

entirely credible; and (4) her residual functional capacity did not preclude her past

relevant work (classified as light and unskilled) as a packager in a poultry-processing

plant. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, see Harris v. Barnhart, 356 F.3d 926, 928

(8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review), we disagree with Bailey’s assertion that the

ALJ’s credibility findings were vague, conclusory, and unexplained, and we conclude

that they are entitled to deference as they were supported by good reasons and

substantial evidence, see Guilliams v. Barnhart, 393 F.3d 798, 801 (8th Cir. 2005).

We also reject Bailey’s challenge to the ALJ’s residual-functional-capacity findings.

See Stormo v. Barnhart, 377 F.3d 801, 807 (8th Cir. 2004) (in determining residual

functional capacity, ALJ must consider medical records, observations of treating

physicians and others, and claimant’s own description of her limitations). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
EXHIBIT 10.21  FIRST AMENDMENT  Cardinal
Health PTS, LLC (Cardinal Health) and Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (Cubist)
are parties to a Processing Services Agreement dated August 11, 2004 (the Agreement).  The
parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth upon the terms and
conditions set forth in the Agreement.  Therefore,
in consideration of the mutual conditions and covenants set forth herein,
Cardinal Health and Cubist agree as follows:  1.     Exhibit B-1 of the
Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the revised Exhibit B-1
Pricing attached to this First Amendment.  Any
conflict between the provisions of this First Amendment and the Agreement shall
be resolved in favor of this First Amendment and capitalized terms used in this
First Amendment shall have the same meaning given to them in the Agreement,
unless otherwise defined in this First Amendment.  This
First Amendment shall be effective May 1, 2005 (Effective Date). Unless
otherwise expressly set forth herein, all other terms and conditions set forth
in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.   CARDINAL
  HEALTH PTS LLC
  
  CUBIST
  PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
  /s/
  Arthur Pelletier
  
  By:
  /s/
  Robert J. JanoskyName:
  Arthur
  Pelletier
  
  Name:
  Robert
  J. JanoskyTitle:
  Vice
  President/General Manager
  
  Title:
  V.P.
  ManufacturingDate:
  May 12,
  2005
  
  Date:
  May 23,
  2005
#### L. Andrew BERNHEIM, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. David ELIA, Daniel Elia, The Alfred Elia Trust, the Estate of Josephine Elia, Bernadette Elia, Tina Elia, the Estate of Alfred Elia, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees, John and Jane Does 1-50, John and Jane Does 51-100, Defendants.

No. 10-1096-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 18, 2011.

Brian M. Melber, Personius Melber, LLP, Buffalo, N.Y. (Philip L. Guarino, Law Office of Philip L. Guarino, Caldwell, N.J., on the brief), for Appellant.

David Elia, Buffalo, N.Y. (David Smith, Smith, Feuerstein & Smith, LLP, Buffalo, N.Y., on the brief), for Appellees.

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges, and JOSEPH F. BIANCO,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Joseph F. Bianco, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

L. Andrew Bernheim appeals from the February 25, 2010 decision and order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Arcara, *J.)*dismissing his complaint. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review.

Bernheim filed this action on February 23, 2005 against defendants David Elia, Daniel Elia, the Estate of Alfred Elia, the Alfred Elia Trust, the Estate of Josephine Elia, Bernadette Elia, Tina Elia, and John Does 1 through 100 (the “Elia defendants”). In his complaint, Bernheim alleges that he is either part or sole owner of D.A. Elia Construction Corp. (“Elia Construction”) and seeks a declaratory judgment to that effect. He also alleges that the Elia defendants wrongfully deprived him of ownership profits and benefits.

After setting out the long and convoluted history of the numerous proceedings involving the parties, the district court de-*408dined to adopt Magistrate Kenneth Schroeder’s report and recommendation that recommended denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and granting Bernheim partial summary judgment on the issue of ownership. The district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court’s decision and opinion of February 25, 2010.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court hereby is AFFIRMED.