alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA 


United States Department of Agriculture 

SEXUAL SSMENT 


IS ILLEGAL! 


It can happen to anyone, anywhere and any time! 


How can you help prevent 


sexual harassment? 


rs/ Know and follow the Department's policy on sexual harassment. 


rs/ l(eep informed by atte.nding training. 

rs/ Know your legal rights and procedures. 

rs/ Take responsibility for your own behavior. 

rs/ Know that sexual harassment can cost you your job and more. 

What To Do If You're Sexually Harassed: 

If you are not comfortable in confronting the Employees may also call the USDA Inspector General (OIG) 

harasser directly, report the conduct to your "Hotline" (calls may be made anonymously). In the 

supervisor or to the harasser's supervisor. For Washington O.C. area, call (202) 690-1622 or (202) 

assistance, advice or formal avenues to report 690-1202 TIY; outside of the Washington D.C. area, call 

sexual harassment, contact your Agency's Civil 1-800-424-9121. 

Rights Office, Federal Women's Program Manager, Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of designated Equal Employment Opportunity communication (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should counselor, or obtain EEO information on our 

contact USOA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 website: www.usda.govI er 

(Voice/llY). 

USDA is an equal opportunity employer 

AD-I 085 bYised September 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ludwing GONZALES-MANZANARES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-40584

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 2014.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Ludwing Gonzales-Manzanares pleaded guilty of being found in the United States without permission, following removal. He was sentenced to a 70-month term of imprisonment. On appeal, he argues that the district court committed reversible plain error by assessing one criminal history point for his prior conviction of simple criminal damage to property. He contends that the prior conviction should have been excluded from the criminal history calculation pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e)(l).

To show plain error, an appellant must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. *Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009). If the appellant makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. *Id.*Gonzales-Manzanares has not met that *341standard because he has not shown that the district court’s inclusion of the criminal history point constituted clear or obvious error. *See United States v. Hardeman,*933 F.2d 278, 281 (5th Cir.1991).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JULY 31, 1997 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         6,632
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 17,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,432
<INVENTORY>                                   22,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              50,579
<PP&E>                                       177,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                89,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               140,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         48,019
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    54,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 140,756
<SALES>                                      430,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             448,674
<CGS>                                        431,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                438,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (4,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (1,847)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,931)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.23)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13312-13313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5177]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER99-3144-003, et al.]

Alliance Companies, et al.; Notice of Convening Session

February 27, 2001.
    In the matter of Alliance Companies, Docket Nos. ER99-3144-003, 
ER99-3144-004 and ER99-3144-005; American Electric Power Service 
Corporation on behalf of: Appalachian Power Company, Columbus 
Southern Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Kentucky 
Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Wheeling 
Power Company, Docket Nos. EC99-80-003, EC99-80-004, and EC99-80-
005; The Detroit Edison Company; First Energy Corporation on behalf 
of: The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison 
Company, Pennsylvania Power Company, The Toledo Edison Company; 
Virginia Electric and Power Company; and Consumers Energy Company, 
Docket Nos. ER00-2869-000 and EC00-103-000 (not consolidated). 
Notice of Convening Session.

    Pursuant to the order in Alliance Companies, et al., 94 FERC para. 
61,070 (2001), the Commission directed parties with grandfathered 
contracts whose terms extend beyond the transition period to negotiate 
amendments or termination of such contracts. To assist the parties, the 
Commission directed the Director of the Commission's Dispute Resolution 
Service (DRS) to convene a meeting of the parties to explore the use of 
an ADR process to foster negotiation and agreement.
    The convening session in this matter will be held on March 5, 2001 
at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission located at 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC. The conference will begin at 11:00 a.m. in 
Room 3M-2A. Any questions with respect to the convening session should 
be directed to Amy Blauman. Her telephone number is (202) 208-2143 and 
her e-mail address is [email protected]
    The purpose of the convening session will be to explore options for 
renegotiating or terminating the relevant grandfathered contracts, as 
directed by the Commission. In addition, the meeting will explore 
whether any future sessions should be held with all parties

[[Page 13313]]

or with individual transmission companies and contracting parties.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5177 Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
2009-1273.

#### C&K Indus. Servs., Inc. v. McIntyre, Kahn & Kruse Co., L.P.A.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92233, 2009-Ohio-2373.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        9,501,936
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 940,327
<ALLOWANCES>                  226,254
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              357,899
<PP&E>                        59,709,985
<DEPRECIATION>                12,269,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                58,462,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,078,305
<BONDS>                       31,025,000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    25,944,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  58,462,018
<SALES>                       2,422,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4,028,096
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,653,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,903,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,124,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (659,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           000
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (659,818)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (9.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (9.30)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.01**

**Certificationof Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

I, Douglas L. Becker,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of LaureateEducation, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge,based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period endedDecember 31, 2006 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|  /s/ Douglas L. Becker                         |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:     Douglas L. Becker          |   |   |
| Date:       April 27, 2007 |   |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derold
L. Kelley, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 18, 2008

/s/ Derold L. Kelley
--------------------
Derold L. Kelley
Secretary/Treasurer and Director
Order entered July 25, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00458

- CR

LONZELL HUNTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judici al District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16

- 76537

- P



### O RDER

Before the Court is Official Court Reporter Lisabeth Kellett’s July 23, 2018 first request

for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and OR DER the

reporter’s record filed within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

MAY 30, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD32869 

 Re: ROGER R. RUSSELL, 

 Movant-Appellant, 

 v. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent-Respondent. 

2. Case No. SD32868 

 Re: RICHARD L. SIMMONS, 

 Movant-Appellant, 

 vs. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent-Respondent. 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b). 

1. Case No. SD32944 

 Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Plaintiff-Respondent, 

 vs. 

 LOUIS JAY DANIELSON, 

 Defendant-Appellant.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [NM-952-01-1420-BJ] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The plats of survey described below are scheduled to be officially filed in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe, New Mexico, thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication. 

## New Mexico Principal Meridian, New Mexico 

T. 9 N., R. 14 W., approved December 4, 2000, for Group 941 NM; 

T. 23 N., R. 10 E., approved November 30, 2000, for Group 951 NM; 

T. 21 S., R. 31 E., approved December 13, 2000, for Group 977 NM; 

T. 29 N., R. 12 W., approved January 24, 2001, for Group 978 NM; 

T. 29 N., R. 14 W., approved February 14, 2001, Supplemental Plat; 

## Indian Meridian, Oklahoma 

T. 27 N., R. 10 W., approved January 24, 2001, for Group 86 OK;

If a protest against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats is received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be stayed pending consideration of the protest. A plat will not be officially filed until the day after all protests have been dismissed and become final or appeals from the dismissal affirmed. 

A person or party who wishes to protest against any of these surveys must file a written protest with the NM State Director, Bureau of Land Management, stating that they wish to protest. 

A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the notice of protest to the State Director, or the statement of reasons must be filed with the State Director within thirty (30) days after the protest is filed. The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, surveys, and subdivisions. 

These plats will be available for inspection in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87502-0115. Copies may be obtained from this office upon payment of $1.10 per sheet. 

Dated: February 15, 2001. 

John P. Bennett, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor for New Mexico. 

[FR Doc. 01-4826 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
#### Efrain Leon MARTINEZ; Patricia Leon, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74941.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2011.

Raul Ernesto Godinez, Esquire, Law Office of Raul E. Godinez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Song Park, OIL, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Efrain Leon Martinez and Patricia Leon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions of law. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ April 26, 2006, motion to reopen on the ground that petitioners were statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal because they overstayed their voluntary departure period. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d). We do not consider petitioners’ contentions regarding prejudice stemming from alleged ineffective assistance of *21counsel because petitioners’ ineligibility for cancellation based on their failure to depart is dispositive.

Petitioners’ pending motion for a stay of the voluntary departure period is denied. *See Garda v. Ashcroft,*368 F.3d 1157, 1159-60 (9th Cir.2004) (order) (court lacks jurisdiction to grant a voluntary departure stay where the request is filed after expiration of the voluntary departure period).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Minority Institutions' Drug Abuse Research Development Program.                    

*Date:*                         March 23, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marina L. Volkov, PhD, Health Scientist Administrator, Office of Extramural Program Review, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 435-1433.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4085  Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4740]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34011]


Gettysburg & Northern Railroad Co.--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Gettysburg Railway Company, Inc., Delaware Transportation 
Group, Inc., and Delaware Valley Railway Company, Inc.

    Gettysburg & Northern Railroad Co. (GNR), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from 
Gettysburg Railway Company, Inc., Delaware Transportation Group, Inc., 
and Delaware Valley Railway Company, Inc. and operate approximately 
23.36 miles of rail line between approximately milepost 31.20, at 
Gettysburg, and milepost 7.84, at Mount Holly Springs, in Adams and 
Cumberland Counties, PA.
    The parties reported that they intended to consummate the 
transaction on or about February 20, 2001. The earliest the transaction 
could have been consummated was February 19, 2001, the effective date 
of the exemption (7 days after the exemption was filed).
    This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 34010, 
Pioneer Railcorp--Continuance in Control Exemption--Gettysburg & 
Northern Railroad Co., wherein Pioneer Railcorp has concurrently filed 
a verified notice to continue in control of GNR upon its becoming a 
Class III rail carrier.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34011, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Daniel A. LaKemper, Esq., Gettysburg & Northern Railroad Co., 
1318 S. Johanson Road, Peoria, IL 61607.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: February 20, 2001.
    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4740 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P