alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*October 28, 2009*

[Cite as *10/28/2009 Case Announcements,*2009-Ohio-5661.]

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

2005-0422.

#### Columbus Bar Assn. v. Am. Family Prepaid Legal Corp.

This cause came on for consideration upon the filing on October 21, 2009 by the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of a motion to amend the statement of costs. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

It is further ordered by the court that pursuant to the court’s October 14, 2009 opinion and order in this matter, which stated that costs would be taxed to respondents American Family Prepaid Legal Corporation, Heritage Marketing and Insurance Services, Inc., Jeffrey Norman, and Stanley Norman, these respondents shall provide reimbursement of additional costs and expenses incurred by the board and relator in the amount of $17,674.57, which costs shall be payable to this court by certified check or money order on or before 30 days from the date of this order.

It is further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before 30 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10% per annum shall accrue on the balance of unpaid board costs, effective 30 days from the date of this order. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before 30 days from the date of this order, this matter will be referred to the Office of the Attorney General for collection.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CRT CORPORATION
("CRT") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Matt Sebal, President
CRT, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of   13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of CRT.

Matt Sebal,
President
November 20, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Blagman
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 117 
          - [CGD01-01-018] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations governing the operation of the Amtrak Bridge, at mile 0.0, across the Shaw Cove at New London, Connecticut. This deviation allows the bridge to remain closed to vessel traffic from 8 a.m. on March 5, 2001 through 11 p.m. on March 8, 2001. This action is necessary to facilitate necessary maintenance at the bridge. 

# DATES:

This deviation is effective March 5, 2001 through March 8, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph Schmied, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7165. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Amtrak Bridge, at mile 0.0, across the Shaw Cove has a vertical clearance of 3 feet at mean high water, and 6 feet at mean low water in the closed position. The existing drawbridge operating regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.223. 

The bridge owner, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), requested a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operating regulations to facilitate necessary maintenance at the bridge. This deviation from the operating regulations allows the bridge to remain closed to vessel traffic from 8 a.m. on March 5, 2001 through 11 p.m. on March 8, 2001. Vessels that can pass under the bridge without an opening may do so at all times during the closed period. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c) this work will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible. This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: February 13, 2001. 

G.N. Naccara, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 01-5266 Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
1 Rule 10(Court of Appeals). Memorandum Opinion . -- (b) The Court , with

concurrence of all judges pa rticipating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memora ndum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINI ON,” shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a subsequent unrelated case. 1 

# FILED Jan, 31, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr . Appellate Court Clerk IN THE COURT OF AP PEALS OF

TENNESSEE, WESTE RN SECTION AT JACKS ON

_______________________________________________________ ) HOWARD A.WOODS, ) Shelby County Chancery

Court ) No. 106415-1 R.D. Plaintiff

/Appella nt. ) ) HON. NEAL SMAL L, CHANCEL

LOR VS. ) ) C. A. No. 02A01-9607-CH-00155 M.T.C. M

ANAGEM

ENT and ) SOLOMON MANAGEMENT , ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED ) Defend ants/Appe

llees. ) OPINI ON FIL ED: ) Howard A. Wo ods , Pro Se J. Whitten Gurkin , Memphis, Tenness ee, for Defend ants/Appe

llees.

______________________________________________________________________________ MEMORAN

DUM OP

INION 1

______________________________________________________________________________ FARMER, J.

The issue before this Court is whether the trial court erred in dismissing Plaintiff’s suit for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff sued the defendants alleging he was wrongfully

evicted from propert y locate d at 3211 As hwood, Me mphis, Ten

nessee. He furth

er alleged that the defendants
were in further violation of the Uniform Residential Landlord a nd Tenant Act set

forth at T.C.A. § 66-28-101 et seq. as follows: § 66-28-501 (noncompliance with rental agree ment by landlord); § 66- 28-502 (failur

e to supply

essentia l service s) and § 66 -28-504 ( unlawful ouster, e xclusion, or diminution of service).

It is without dispute that Shelby County meets the population provisions of the Act set forth at § 66-28 -102. Section 66-28 -105(a)provides :2 Th e gen eral sessions and circuit c ourts of this sta te shall e xercise original ju risdict ion over any la ndlord or tenant with respect to any conduct in this state governed by this chapter. (Emphasis added.)

The relief sought falls within the above statute. The plaintiff brough t this acti on in chancery court. It is clear fr

omthe statute that

the trial court was correct in dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The judgment entered below is a

ffirmed and the c osts of this ap pe al ar e t ax ed to th e a pp el la nt , H ow ar d A . W oo ds , f or wh ic h e xe cu ti on ma y is su e i f n ec es sa ry.

___________________________________ FARMER, J.

______________________________ CRAWF ORD, P.J., W.S. (C oncurs)

______________________________ HIGHERS, J . (Concur

s)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Dwaun BROWN, Appellant.

No. 06-1540.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 22, 2007.

Filed: March 1, 2007.

*497James C. Delworth, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Dwaun Brown, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.

Joann Trog, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dwaun Brown (Brown) pled guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Brown objected to his classification as a career offender, arguing in reliance on *Shepard v. United States,*544 U.S. 13, 27-28, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005) (Thomas, J. concurring), his prior convictions should not be used to enhance his sentence, despite *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 247, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (sentence-enhancing prior conviction need not be charged in indictment; due process does not require treating recidivism as element of offense). The district court1 overruled the objection, and sentenced Brown to 188 months’ imprisonment. Brown appeals, arguing his sentence violates the Fifth and Eighth Amendments.

These arguments are unavailing. *See United States v. Johnson,*408 F.3d 535, 540 (8th Cir.2005) (“The Supreme Court has never overruled its decision in *Almendarez-Torres,*and *Shepard*did not alter the rule that a court may consider prior criminal history as a sentencing factor.”); *United States v. Collins,*340 F.3d 672, 679 (8th Cir.2003) (“The Eighth Amendment forbids only extreme sentences that are grossly disproportionate to the crime.” (internal quotations omitted)). Brown’s sentence is not unreasonable. Consequently, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2018

t1217 

# Order

Clerk December 21, 2018

157845

DEANNA RAY and All Others Similarly

Situated, a Certified Class,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157845

COA: 337058

Ingham CC: 13

- 001242

- NZ

CITY OF LANSING,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
943 A.2d 262

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Nathan A. ETCHISON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 5, 2008.

Decided March 24, 2008.

*352Ryan Cassidy Helsel, Rebecca J. Lozzi, Public Defender, Butler, for Nathan *A'.*Etchison.

Jennifer Anne Buck, Randa Bobette Clark, Butler, for Com. of Pennsylvania.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Chief Justice CASTILLE dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         442,458
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,546,616
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,216,681
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,140,709
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,191,341
<LOANS>                                     92,948,135
<ALLOWANCE>                                    320,867
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,937,198
<DEPOSITS>                                  86,461,984
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            921,317
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,203,550
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,350,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             109,937,198
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,899,115
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              382,163
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               151,590
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,423,868
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,155,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,410,105
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,022,763
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   19,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (5,905)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,522,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,600,042
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,600,042
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   968,612
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.76
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               320,867
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              320,867
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           320,867
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR INSPECTION PROGRAM 

PERSONNEL AND IN-COMMERCE PERSONNEL 

FSIS ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION 

FSIS-61-10 (N95) Respirator Mask N95 (DT-N95-FH) 

FSIS-88 Disposable Mask (50/box) 

FSIS-88N Disposable Mask (50/box) 

FSIS-88C-SM Light Face Coverings 

FSIS-88C-MED Light Face Coverings 

FSIS-88C-LG Light Face Coverings 

FSIS-88D-SM Heavy Face Coverings 

FSIS-88D-MD Heavy Face Coverings 

FSIS-88D-LG Heavy Face Coverings 

FSIS-86 Elvex Face Shield 

FSIS-86A Elvex Face Shield Adapter, Model #3NMW9 

FSIS-86B Elvex Face Shield Bracket, Model #3NMC4 

FSIS-86C Elvex Universal Slot Adapter 

FSIS-90 ERB Face Shield 

FSIS-90A ERB Face Shields Adapter/Carrier 

FSIS-97 ERB Face Shield/Earmuff Headgear System 

FSIS-96 Bullard Face Shield 

FSIS-96A Bullard 300B Bracket Bond Mount 

FSIS-57A Anti-Fog Spray w/ Microfiber Cleaning Cloth 

FSIS-57B Frog Spit Anti-Fog Towelettes 4”X6” 

FSS-57 Anti-Fog Eyeglasses Wipes 

FSIS-80A Hand Sanitizer (8 oz) 

FSIS-80B Hand Sanitizer (10 oz) 

FSIS-80C Hand Sanitizer (16.9 oz) 

FSIS-80-GAL Hand Sanitizer (gallon size) 

FSIS-80-Spray Bottle Spray Bottle (32 oz) 

FSIS-80-Funnel Funnel (For Gallon size sanitizer) 

FSIS-92 Disinfectant Wipes (80 Wipes) 

FSIS-92A Disinfectant Wipes (100 count) 

FSIS-94 Disinfectant Wipes (700 count)
EX-35.3
(logo)WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc.
2 World Financial Center
Building B
New York, NY 10281


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Securities
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


February 25, 2008


/s/ Jacquelyn E Kimball
Jacquelyn E Kimball
Vice President


(page)


(logo)WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc. Asset-Backed
Certificates, Series 2007-3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and
Securities Administrator, as applicable

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for NHEL2006-HE3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for NHEL2006-HE1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

4 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for NHEL2006-FM1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

5 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for NHEL2006-WF1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

6 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for NHEL 2006-HE2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

7 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for NHEL2006-FM2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

8 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for NHEL2006-AF1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

9 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc. Asset-Backed
Certificates, Series 2007-2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and
Securities Administrator, as applicable
#### William A. FORCIER, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, RespondentAppellee.

No. 2006-7328.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 6, 2007.

Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LINN, Circuit Judge.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R.36
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0000831246
<NAME>                              FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<CURRENCY>                          U.S DOLLARS

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1.00
<CASH>                              5,907,945
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       3,117,149
<ALLOWANCES>                        (21,851,630)
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    5,591,210
<PP&E>                              915,470
<DEPRECIATION>                      69,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      176,156,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               7,275,306
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            59,167
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        176,156,624
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    10,541,360
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    4,092,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  3,835,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     461,179
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        461,179
<EPS-BASIC>                       .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .08



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-33603, 333-38648, 333-84333, 333-119878 and 333-153149 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 31, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Urban Outfitters, Inc. andsubsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Urban Outfitters, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urban Outfitters, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2010. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 31, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,342]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on November 20, 2000 in response to a worker petition which was filed on November 20, 2000 on behalf of workers at Gulf States Steel, Gadsden, Alabama.

Since all workers at the subject firm were separated prior to November 23, 2000, workers are eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance benefits under a certification which was issued on November 23, 1998, and covered all separations extending through November 23, 2000 (TA-W-35,108). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of January, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-5085 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M