alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,119
<INVENTORY>                                        310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,315
<PP&E>                                          67,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,774
<BONDS>                                         26,158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,762
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,112
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,011
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Michael J. McKelvey, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of eResearchTechnology, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
1

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 6, 2007 /s/ Michael J. McKelvey Michael J. McKelvey,    President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer  
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          25,593
<SECURITIES>                                     7,358
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (137)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,070
<PP&E>                                           7,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,805
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,340
<SALES>                                          2,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2871 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

extend public safety officers’ death benefits to fire police officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2018 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. TOOMEY, and Mr. MURPHY) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to extend public safety officers’ death benefits to fire police officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fire Police Fairness 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2871 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENDING PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER DEATH BENE2 FITS TO FIRE POLICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1204 of title I the Omni4 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 

5 U.S.C. 10284) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through 

7 (9) as paragraphs (6) through (10), respectively; 

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol9 lowing new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(5) ‘fire police officer’ includes an individual 

11 who— 

12 ‘‘(A) is serving in accordance with State or 

13 local law as an officially recognized or des14 ignated member of a legally organized public 

15 safety agency but is not a law enforcement offi16 cer, a firefighter, a chaplain, or a member of a 

17 rescue squad or ambulance crew described in 

18 paragraph (10)(D); and 

19 ‘‘(B) provides scene security or directs 

20 traffic— 

21 ‘‘(i) in response to any fire drill, fire 

22 call, or other fire, rescue, or police emer23 gency; or 

24 ‘‘(ii) at a planned special event;’’; and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2871 IS

1 (3) in paragraph (10)(A), as so redesignated, 

2 by inserting ‘‘as a fire police officer,’’ after ‘‘fire3 fighter,’’. 

4 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

5 Section 611(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening America 

6 by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and 

7 Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (34 U.S.C. 10286(a)) is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘section 1204(7)(B)’’ and in10 serting ‘‘section 1204(8)(B) of title I’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘(42 U.S.C. 3796b(7)(B))’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘(34 U.S.C. 10284(8)(B))’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
   The  schedule  contains  summary  financial information  extracted  from  the
   financial  statements  included  in the  Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended
   September 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           5,469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      517
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          67,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             6
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,123
<SALES>                                          7,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,938
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,082
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,111
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (996)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.17)
        


</TABLE>
2009-1591.

#### State v. Majid.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90491,182 Ohio App.3d 730, 2009-Ohio-3075.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2487 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2487

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on certain ceramic ferrules 
                              and sleeves.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1993

 Mr. Ramstad introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on certain ceramic ferrules 
                              and sleeves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERAMIC FERRULES AND SLEEVES.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

  

       ``  9902.69.14  Ceramic ferrules and mating sleeves of either alumina or                    No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        zirconia, not exceeding 3 mm in diameter and 25 mm in                                                         31/94           ''
                        length, and having a fiber channel opening (provided for                                                                       .
                        in subheading 6914.90.00)...............................  Free                                                                  

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2


 





AMENDMENT #2 TO THE SENIOR
SECURED


PROMISSORY NOTE ORIGINALLY
ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2019


 


THIS AMENDMENT
#2 to the Note (as defined below) (the "Amendment") is entered into effective July 15, 2020 (the "Effective Date"),
by and between Predictive Oncology, Inc. (fka Precision Therapeutics, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and Oasis Capital, LLC, a Puerto Rico limited liability company (the "Holder", and together with the Company, the "Parties").


 


BACKGROUND


 


A.              
The Company issued that certain senior secured promissory note to the Holder on September 27, 2019, as amended on March
19, 2020 (as so amended, the "Note").


 


B.               
The Company and Holder previously extended the Maturity Date (as defined below) from June 30, 2020 to July 15, 2020 and
desire to further amend the Note as set forth expressly below.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


Upon the
execution of this Amendment (as defined below) by the Company, (i) the "Maturity Date" for all amounts of principal,
interest and other amounts owed and outstanding under the Note as of the Effective Date shall be extended to September 30, 2020,
and in exchange for such extension (ii) the outstanding principal amount of the Note is hereby increased by Three Hundred Forty-Five
Thousand Dollars ($345,000.00) such that as of the Effective Date, the outstanding principal amount (not including accrued interest
and any other amounts) owed under the Note is $1,280,833.00.


 


This Amendment
shall be deemed part of but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the Note. Except
as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Note, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment,
shall remain in full force and effect, and this Amendment shall be governed by the same law, and have the same conflict resolution
provisions, as set forth in the Note. The parties hereby ratify and confirm the terms and conditions of the Note, as supplemented
and amended by this Amendment.






    	 	1	 



     


    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


 


 


 


 


	PREDICTIVE ONCOLOGY INC.	 
	 	 
	Name:	 	/s/ Bob Myers	 
	Title:	 	CFO	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	OASIS CAPITAL, LLC	 
	 	 
	Name:	 	/s/ Adam R. Long	 
	Title:	 	Managing Member	 






 


 


 


 


 


2
2009-1156.

#### State v. Morris.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-1139, 2009-Ohio-2396.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4980]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[AAG/A Order No. 220-2001]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records; Delay of Effective Date

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action delays the effective date of the amendments to the 
Privacy Act notice for the National Instant Criminal Background Check 
System (Justice/FBI-018) published on January 22, 2001, at 66 FR 6676.

DATES: The effective date of the amendments to the Privacy Act notice 
for the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (Justice/FBI-
018) published on January 22, 2001, at 66 FR 6676, is delayed for 60 
days, from March 5, 2001, until May 4, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary E. Cahill, Management Analyst, 
Management and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Department 
of Justice, 1400 National Place Building, Washington, DC 20530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department is delaying the effective 
date of the amendments to the Privacy Act notice published for the 
National Instant Criminal Background Check System (Justice/FBI-018) on 
January 22, 2001, at 66 FR 6676, for 60 days, from March 5, 2001 to a 
new effective date of May 4, 2001. This delay in effective date is 
being done in order to conform with the delayed effective date of the 
final rule entitled ``National Instant Criminal Background Check System 
Regulation'' published in the Federal Register on January 22, 2001, at 
66 FR 6470, which is the basis for the amendments made in the Privacy 
Act notice. In accordance with the memorandum of January 20, 2001, from 
the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled 
``Regulatory Review Plan,'' published in the Federal Register on 
January 24, 2001 (66 FR 7702), the effective date of the final rule is 
being delayed for 60 days, from March 5, 2001, until May 4, 2001. The 
temporary 60-day delay in effective date is necessary to give 
Department of Justice officials the opportunity for further review and 
consideration of new regulations, consistent with the Assistant to the 
President's memorandum of January 20, 2001. The delay of effective date 
of the final rule entitled ``National Instant Criminal Background Check 
Regulation'' is published in the Rules section of this issue of the 
Federal Register.

    Dated: February 13, 2001.
Stephen R. Colgate,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-4980 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-M
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2817 

To clarify that funding for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 

is not subject to the sequester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2018 

Mr. ENZI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To clarify that funding for the Public Company Accounting 

Oversight Board is not subject to the sequester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION. 

4 Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emer5 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) does 

6 not apply with respect to the funding of the Public Com7 pany Accounting Oversight Board. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### Christopher Arlando NEWMAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-2164.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 19, 2007.

Decided: March 29, 2007.

Marc Seguinót, Seguinót & Associates, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney Gen*333eral, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Kelly J. Walls, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Arlando Newman, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider. We review the Board’s decision to grant or deny a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. *INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006). A motion for reconsideration asserts that the Board made an error in its earlier decision, *Turri v. INS,*997 F.2d 1306, 1311 n. 4 (10th Cir.1993), and requires the movant to specify the error of fact or law in the prior Board decision. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (2006); *Matter of Cerna,*20 I. *&*N. Dec. 399, 402 (BIA 1991) (noting that a motion to reconsider questions a decision for alleged errors in appraising the facts and the law). The burden is on the movant to establish that reconsideration is warranted. *INS v. Abudu,*485 U.S. 94, 110, 108 S.Ct. 904, 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988). “To be within a mile of being granted, a motion for reconsideration has to give the tribunal to which it is addressed a reason for changing its mind.” *Ahmed v. Ashcroft,*388 F.3d 247, 249 (7th Cir.2004). Motions that simply repeat contentions that have already been rejected are insufficient to convince the Board to reconsider a previous decision. *Id.*

We find the Board did not abuse its discretion in finding that Newman’s conviction for unlawful conversion of merchandise was a crime of moral turpitude. We further find the Board did not abuse its discretion in finding that the immigration judge specified the charges for which he was ordered removed. In addition, the immigration judge’s failure to rule on other charges of removability was harmless error.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*