alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,390,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,538,022
<PP&E>                                       5,559,918
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,274,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,839,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,275
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,608,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,839,445
<SALES>                                      1,198,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,609,627
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,365,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                243,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            243,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   243,984
<EPS-BASIC>                                       9.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.83


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND D ISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00561

- CR

Ruth Maree Lara

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1330360D )

Janua ry 16 , 201 4

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DIST RICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Val J. Christensen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of EnergySolutions,Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of EnergySolutions, Inc.

March 1, 2010

By:

/s/ VAL J. CHRISTENSEN Val J. Christensen,President and Chief Executive Officer


I,
Mark C. McBride, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
EnergySolutions, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of EnergySolutions, Inc.

March 1, 2010

By:

/s/ MARK C. MCBRIDE Mark C. McBride,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EnergySolutions, Inc. and will be
retained by EnergySolutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
# FY22_Q1

# Percent Positives - User Notes
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2826 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2826


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 2 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To provide for an investigation of the whereabouts of the United States 
   citizens and others who have been missing from Cyprus since 1974.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND OTHERS MISSING FROM CYPRUS.

    (a) Investigation.--As soon as is practicable, the President shall 
undertake, in cooperation with an appropriate international 
organization or nongovernmental organization, a thorough investigation 
of the whereabouts of the United States citizens and others who have 
been missing from Cyprus since 1974. The investigation shall focus
on the countries and communities which were combatants in Cyprus in 
1974, all of which currently receive United States foreign assistance.
    (b) Results of the Investigation.--The President shall report the 
findings of this investigation to the family of each of the United 
States citizens and others who have been missing from Cyprus since 1974 
and to the Congress. Such reports shall include the whereabouts of the 
missing.
    (c) Returning the Missing.--The President, in cooperation with an 
appropriate international organization or nongovernmental organization, 
shall do everything possible to return to their families, as soon as is 
practicable, the United States citizens and others who have been 
missing from Cyprus since 1974, including returning the remains of 
those who are no longer alive.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,






                                                                 Clerk.
                                     







103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2826

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for an investigation of the whereabouts of the United States 
   citizens and others who have been missing from Cyprus since 1974.`
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (01-031)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Prospective Patent License. 

# SUMMARY:

NASA hereby gives notice that SRS Technologies, Inc., of Huntsville, AL, 35806, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the inventions described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 5,520,960 entitled “Electrically Conductive Polyimides Containing Silver Trifluoroacetylacetonate”; U.S. Patent No. 5,575,955 entitled “Electrically Conductive Polyimide Film Containing Gold (III) Ions, Composition, and Process of Making”; U.S. Patent No. 5,677,418 entitled “Reflective Self-Metallizing Polyimide Films”; U.S. Patent No. 6,019,926, entitled “Reflective Silvered Polyimide Films Via In-Situ Thermal Reduction of Silver (I) Complexes”; U.S. Patent No. 5,502,156 entitled “Electrically Conducting Polyimide Film Containing Tin Complexes”; U.S. Patent No. 5,376,209 entitled “Process for Preparing an Assembly of an Article and a Polyimide Which Resists Dimensional Change, Delamination, and Debonding When Exposed to Changes in Temperature,” and U.S. Patent No. 5,248,519 entitled “Process for Preparing an Assembly of an Article and a Soluble Polyimide Which Resists Dimensional Change, Delamination, and Debonding When Exposed to Changes in Temperature,” all of which are assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Ms. Robin W. Edwards, Patent Attorney, Langley Research Center. 

# DATES:

Responses to this notice must be received by May 1, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robin W. Edwards, Patent Attorney, Langley Research Center, Mail Stop 212, Hampton, VA, 23681-2199; telephone 757-864-3230. 

Dated: February 23, 2001. 

Edward A. Frankle, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 01-5034 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
#### Mohammad PAZIR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-1780.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 28, 2007.

Decided: March 15, 2007.

Pablo Santiago, Jr., Law Offices of Pablo Santiago, Jr., Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, William C. Minick, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before KING, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

*297Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Pazir, a native and citizen of Pakistan, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) finding that he is ineligible for relief from removal. Pazir contends that the IJ erred in finding that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel at the February 5, 2004 hearing. We have reviewed the record and conclude that this contention is without merit. *See Delgado-Corea v. INS,*804 F.2d 261, 263 (4th Cir.1986). Next, we reject Pazir’s claims that the IJ and government counsel behaved inappropriately and unfairly, or violated his right to due process, at the February 5, 2004 hearing. *See Rusu v. INS,*296 F.3d 316, 320 (4th Cir.2002). Finally, we find no abuse of discretion in the IJ’s denial of a continuance from the March 1, 2004 hearing. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2006).

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1201

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Quentin Jerome Thompson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: August 2, 2012

Filed: August 28, 2012

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Quentin Thompson directly appeals after he pleaded guilty, pursuant to a

written plea agreement, to a drug-conspiracy offense, and the district court sentenced 1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.
him to 235 months in prison, within the calculated advisory Guidelines range. His

counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing

that the prison term is unreasonable, and requesting leave to withdraw as counsel. 

The government has moved to dismiss the appeal based on an appeal waiver

contained in Thompson’s plea agreement. Thompson has filed numerous pro se

motions, including a motion for an extension of time to file a supplemental brief. We

deny this motion as moot because this court has filed Thompson’s supplemental 

brief, in which he argues that (1) the district court erroneously applied a sentencing

enhancement for being a manager orsupervisor ofthe conspiracy; and (2) information

used to prosecute him was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. 

Upon careful review, we conclude that all of the issues raised on appeal are

within the scope of the appeal waiver, that Thompson entered into both the plea

agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, and that enforcing the

waiver will not result in a miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis, 333

F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (criteria for enforcing appeal waiver); see

also Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977) (solemn declarationsin open court

carry strong presumption of verity); United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070,

1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). In

addition, we have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), and we have found no nonfrivolous issuesfor appeal outside the scope

of the appeal waiver.

Accordingly, we deny as moot Thompson’s motion for an extension of time to

file a supplemental brief, and we deny all of his remaining pro se motions. We grant

the government’s pending motion, and therefore dismiss the appeal. Finally, we grant

counsel leave to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Thompson about procedures

for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

______________________________

-2-
2009-1299.

#### [State ex rel.] Broadnax v. Wiseman.

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
#### The State (John Price, Prosecutor), *vs.*Elijah Bennett et al.

In laying out a road, tlie surveyors should make an assessment to each owner of land who is not an applicant, and if they omit to do so the return will be set aside; but if such owner mislead the surveyors, and cause them to omit making any assessment to him, he cannot take advantage of his own wrong, and the assessment will not be set aside on account of the omission.

*Certiorari*to Cape May Common Pleas, in matter of highway.

Argued before Ogden, Haines and Ryerson, Justices.

Haines, J.

By the return and testimony taken, it appears that the road was laid over lands belonging, in severalty, to John Price, the prosecutor, and that no assessment of damages was made to him.

In answer to the reason assigned for reversal, it is said, that Price, by his own actions and declarations, induced the *330surveyors to omit making an assessment to liim, and to make it to the heirs of Daniel Swain, of which his wife is one. If so, he cannot avail himself of an omission which he has caused, and so take an advantage of his own wrong»

But the evidence of his statements, if they relate to the same land, is conflicting. Some of the witnesses say that when Price was asked whose farm they were u|)on, he replied that it was land of the heirs of Daniel Swain; others say that he distinctly told the surveyors they were upon his land.

He may have made these statements on different parcels of land, and then both might have been true, and the testimony harmonize.

We have had exhibited deeds showing that he, Price, held in severalty land over which the road ran, and it would be unsafe to say that the evidence shows that he caused the omission.

His deeds were upon record, and could have been seen by the applicants for the road and the surveyors, and, unless misled by Price, an assessment should have been made to him.

On the authority of *The State*v. *Everett et al.,*3 *Zab.*378, the proceedings of the surveyors were erroneous, and should have been set aside by the Court of Common Pleas.

The order for recording the return must be reversed, and the return and proceedings of the surveyors must be set aside.

Ogden and Ryerson, Justices, concurred.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

West Marine Products, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine FSC, Inc., a Barbados corporation

West Marine Finance Company, a California corporation

West Marine Management Company, a California corporation

West Marine LBC, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine IHC I, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine IHC II, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine, Inc., a Delaware corporation

E&B Marine LBC, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine IHC I, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine IHC II, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine Supply , Inc., a New Jersey corporation

E&B Marine Supply , Inc., a Maryland corporation

E&B Marine Supply (Florida) , Inc., a Delaware corporation

Goldbergs' Marine Distributors, Inc., a Delaware corporation

James Bliss & Co., Inc., a Massachusetts corporation

Sea Ranger Marine Inc., a Delaware corporation

Krista Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Central Marine Supply Inc., a New Jersey corporation

Central Marine Supply (Florida), Inc., a Delaware corporation
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2777

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the 12-year limitation

of eligibility for the vocational rehabilitation program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY (by request) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the 12-

year limitation of eligibility for the vocational rehabilitation program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That chapter 31 of title 38, United States Code, is amend4 ed—

5 (1) by striking out section 3103 (relating to pe6 riods of eligibility); and

7 (2) in the table of sections, by striking out the

8 item relating to section 3103.

Æ
FSIS 1411-4 (10/15/2023)a Page 1 of 1

Date of Contact 

with 

LEP Individual 

(mm/dd/yyyy)

Personnel who Communicated 

with LEP Individuals

Primary Language 

Spoken by LEP 

 Individual

Geographic 

Location of LEP 

Individual 

(City, State)

Method of Contact 

with LEP Individual 

(Written Translation or Oral 

Interpretation)

Type of Service Provided 

to LEP Individual 

(Written Translation or Oral 

Interpretation)

LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT (LEP) INDIVIDUAL CONTACT LOG

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Kentucky USA Energy, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Charles M. Stivers, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Charles M.
      StiversName:
      Charles M. StiversTitle: Interim Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      February 16, 2010
Exhibit 99.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Executive Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:





| | 1) |  | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 2, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 2, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    Michael F. Anthony





Michael F. Anthony


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Director





Dated: December 17, 2002




1
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                           |                              |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                        | Dark                Dynamite, Inc. (Registrant)                |
|                                   |                                                      |                         |
| Date: November                22, 2005 | By:                                                  | /s/ Lei,                Ming |
|                                        | Lei,                MingChief                Executive Officer |
2009-1638.

#### State v. Crawford.

Montgomery App. No. 22314, 2008-Ohio-4008. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
# Percent Positive - User Note

https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/0273bc3d-2363-45b3-befb-1190c25f3c8b/MLG-41.pdf?MOD=AJPERES

# FY2023Q2