alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:November 19, 2010By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director
[No. 57845-6-I.

Division One.

October 1, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Carlton M. Paul, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 05-1-00759-6, Ronald L. Castleberry, J., entered February 22, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10793 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

WESLEY MICHAEL WOODYARD
,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 156

- 1

Before DAVIS , HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wesley Michael Woodyard has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Woodyard h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 17 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10793 Document: 00514433076 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2018No. 17

- 10793

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-10793 Document: 00514433076 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2018
#### McConnell *v.*The State.

Submitted April 15,

Decided April 25, 1901.

Indictment for assault with intent to murder. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. March 26, 1901.

*John W. Bale,*for plaintiff in error.

*Moses Wright, solicitor-general,*contra.

Cobb, J.

Under the evidence disclosed by the record, a verdict for assault with intent to murder was unauthorized. Taking the testimony most strongly against the accused, it did not warrant a conviction for any higher offense than that of stabbing.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP96-320-034]

Take notice that on December 22, 2000, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company (“Koch”) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) contracts between Koch and the following companies for disclosure of recently negotiated rate transactions. As shown on the contracts, Koch requests an effective date of January 1, 2001. 

#### Special Negotiated Rate Between

Koch Gateway Pipeline and Mobile Energy LLC

Koch Gateway Pipeline and Koch Energy Trading Company 

Koch states that copies of the filing are being made available for public inspection during regular business hours in Koch's offices in Houston, Texas. In addition, Koch states that it has served copies of this filing upon all parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-522 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 14-1126

________________

M.D. STEVEN S. SIMRING,

United States of America, ex rel.

v.

RUTGERS, The State University of New Jersey;

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL;

JAMES LAWLER; JOHN DOES 1-25, (Employees of University of Medicine and 

Dentistry), UMDNJ-University

Hospital and/or New Jersey Medical School; CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES;

MICHAEL SAULICH; CATHERINE GIBBONS; UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN

ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY INC.

M.D. Steven S. Simring,

Appellant

________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civil Action No. 3-04-cv-03530)

District Judge: Honorable Peter G. Sheridan

________________

Before: AMBRO, SCIRICA, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

__________________________________

The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellant, Steven Simring, M.D. in the 

above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision 
of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is 

granted. The opinion and judgment entered July 7, 2015 are hereby VACATED.1 A 

subsequent opinion and judgment will be issued.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: August 4, 2015

 

1 As the merits panel has vacated the prior opinion and judgment, action is not required 

by the en banc court.
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Principal
Financial/Accounting Officer





I, Yan
Lin, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Kun Run Biotechnology, Inc. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;







By:
            /s/
      Yan LinDated:
      July 30, 2009Name:
      Yan LinTitle:
      Chief Accounting Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### Rhonna M. KELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-2487.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 2014.

Decided: April 24, 2014.

Rhonna M. Kelson, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rhonna M. Kelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Kelson v. Dep’t of the Navy,*No. 7:13-cv-00022-D, 2013 WL 6058205 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 15, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), IAP Research, Inc.: Electromagnetic Dynamic Compaction has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing a change in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Ideas & Inventions, Anderson, IN has been added as a party to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IAP Research, Inc.: Electromagnetic Dynamic Compaction intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On July 21, 1999, IAP Research, Inc.: Electromagnetic Dynamic Compaction filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on December 14, 1999 (64 FR 69799).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-5063 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Gabriel RODRIGUEZ-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41069

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Gabriel Rodriguez-Romero raises arguments that are foreclosed by *376
      *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *376published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[No. 35156-1-II.

Division Two.

August 7, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Titus D. Peterson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 03-1-01526-3, Thomas P. Larkin, J., entered June 30, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J.
### F I LE D U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E LEVE NTH CI RCUI T O c t obe r 18, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN C L E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 11269 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C. Do c k e tNo . 0 4 - 2 0 5 4 1 - CR - J EM U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s A N A C E C I L I A V A R G A S , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( O c t ob e r 18, 2005) B efo re T JO F L A T , H U L L an dW IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

S hery l J. L ow enthal , appo i nt ed coun se l for A na C ec i l i a V ar gas i n thi s di re ct c r i m i na l appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the ap p e llan t a n df

ile dab r ie f

p u r s u a n t to A n d e r s v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 , 8 7 S .C t. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L .E d .2 d4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 ) . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls th atco u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd V a r ga s ’ s c onvi c t i on a nd se nt ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
Order entered July 20 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00564

- CV

REGENCY DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION SERVI CES, LLC, Appellant

V.

RALPH CARRINGTON D/B /A CAR RINGTON AIR CONDITIO NING AND HEATING, ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 15186



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 17, 2018 unopposed second motion for an extension

o f time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to August 2, 2018

.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of ATEL 12, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K.
Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2009                                              
|                                                                  
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                
|Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and
|Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC                
|(Managing Member)                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Kendra A. Borrego, Chief Financial Officer of
IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc..
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  | 
|-------------- |  |  |  | 
|              
|April 24, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  |
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2466

To make emergency supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1993 to

provide refugee impact assistance for the States of Florida, Massachusetts, and New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1993

Mr. MICA (for himself, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. FOWLER,

Mr. GILMAN, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. CANADY, Mr. LAZIO, Ms.

ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. SHAW, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. YOUNG of Florida,

Ms. MOLINARI, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida, Mr. PAXON, Mr. GOSS, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. BACCHUS

of Florida, Mr. ACKERMAN, and Mr. LEWIS of Florida) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To make emergency supplemental appropriations for fiscal

year 1993 to provide refugee impact assistance for the

States of Florida, Massachusetts, and New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refugee Impact Assist5 ance Supplemental Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year

6 1993’’.
2

•HR 2466 IH

1 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS.

2 The following sums are appropriated, out of any

3 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to pro4 vide emergency supplemental appropriations for fiscal year

5 1993:

6 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

7 SERVICES

8 ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

9 REFUGEE AND ENTRANT ASSISTANCE

10 For an additional amount for ‘‘Refugee and entrant

11 assistance’’ for the purpose of targeted assistance grants

12 to States for unreimbursed refugee assistance expenses re13 sulting from the entry into the United States of HIV-in14 fected Haitian refugees, $1,830,000, of which amount

15 $1,098,000 shall be made available to Florida, $274,500

16 shall be made available to Massachusetts, and $457,500

17 shall be made available to New York.

18 SEC. 3. EMERGENCY DESIGNATION.

19 (a) DESIGNATION BY CONGRESS.—The Congress

20 hereby designates the entire amount provided in section

21 2 as an emergency requirement for all purposes of the Bal22 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

23 (b) REQUIREMENT OF DESIGNATION BY PRESI24 DENT.—The amount provided in section 2 shall be avail25 able only to the extent of a specific dollar amount for the

26 purpose specified in such section that is included in an
3

•HR 2466 IH

1 official budget request submitted by the President to the

2 Congress and that is designated as an emergency require3 ment for all purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emer4 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

       
<S>                                       <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        7,236,885
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                      10,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              7,972,209
<PP&E>                                           81,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               22,798,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           721,290
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          9,670
<OTHER-SE>                                   22,076,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 22,798,262
<SALES>                                           8,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8,028
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              3,166,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               74,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,056,566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,056,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.38)
        


</TABLE>