alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2893 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2893

 To provide for prompt payments to small business contractors, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2018

 Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for prompt payments to small business contractors, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROMPT PAYMENTS OF SMALL BUSINESS CONTRACTORS.

    Section 2307(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
            (2) by striking ``The head of any agency may--'' and 
        inserting ``(1) The head of any agency may''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2)(A) For a prime contractor (as defined in section 8701 of 
title 41) that is a small business concern (as defined in section 3 of 
the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)), the head of an agency shall, 
to the fullest extent permitted by law, establish an accelerated 
payment date with a goal of 15 days after receipt of a proper invoice 
for the amount due if a specific payment date is not established by 
contract.
    ``(B) For a prime contractor that subcontracts with a small 
business concern, the head of an agency shall, to the fullest extent 
permitted by law, establish an accelerated payment date with a goal of 
15 days after receipt of a proper invoice for the amount due if--
            ``(i) a specific payment date is not established by 
        contract; and
            ``(ii) the prime contractor agrees to make payments to the 
        subcontractor in accordance with the accelerated payment date, 
        to the maximum extent practicable, without any further 
        consideration from or fees charged to the subcontractor.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santiago GARCIA-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-20511

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

*376Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Santiago Garcia-Castillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EX-4.4





 Exhibit 4.4 

TOTAL CAPITAL 
 TOTAL SE

 Officer’s Certificate 

Pursuant to Section 102 of the Indenture 

Total Finance Corporate Services Limited, a United Kingdom limited company (“TFCS”) and a duly appointed Director (Administrateur) of Total
Capital, a société anonyme duly organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of France, registered with the Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés of Nanterre under number 428 292 023 (the
“Company”), and Antoine Larenaudie, duly appointed Group Treasurer of TOTAL SE, a European company (Societas Europaea or SE) duly organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of France, registered with the Registre du
Commerce et des Sociétés of Nanterre under number 542 051 180 (the “Guarantor”), hereby make the following statements pursuant to Section 102 of the indenture dated October 2, 2009, and amended by the first
supplemental indenture dated October 11, 2018 and as further amended by the second supplemental indenture dated July 22, 2020, among the Company, the Guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon, acting through its London Branch, as trustee (the
“Indenture”): 
  

	 	(a)	 the undersigned has read the provisions of the Indenture, including without limitation, Section 901 (1) setting
forth the conditions relating to the succession of another corporation, including as substitute obligor, to the Guarantor and the assumption by such successor of the covenants of the Guarantor in the Indenture and in the Guarantees and in respect of
compliance with which this certificate is being delivered, and the definitions in the Indenture relating thereto; 


  

	 	(b)	 the undersigned has examined the resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company, such other corporate
records of the Company and the Guarantor, and such other documents deemed necessary as a basis for the opinion hereinafter expressed; 


  

	 	(c)	 in the opinion of the undersigned, such examination is sufficient to enable it to express an informed opinion
as to whether or not the conditions referred to above have been complied with; and 


  

	 	(d)	 the undersigned is of the opinion that such conditions have been complied with. 



Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Indenture. 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed and delivered this certificate as of
the date set forth below. 
 Dated: July 22, 2020 
  

			
	
	 TOTAL FINANCE CORPORATE SERVICES LIMITED



  

			
		
	By:	 	/S/ ANTOINE LARENAUDIE
	Name:	 	Antoine Larenaudie
	Title:	 	 Authorized Signatory
  



  

			
	
	TOTAL SE 
		
	By:	 	/S/ ANTOINE LARENAUDIE
	Name:	 	Antoine Larenaudie
	Title:	 	 Group Treasurer
  



 [Signature Page to Officer’s Certificate under the Indenture]
2009-1791.

#### State v. Samples.

Stark App. No. 2008 CA 00027.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0574

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MALINDA CRAZYMULE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 9, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 4 2022

04/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0574
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Lawrence Williams, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Gateway Certifications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |                            |                                                     |  | 
|------------------- | -------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                    |                            |                                                    
|Dated: May 19, 2008 | /s/ Lawrence Williams, Jr. |                                                    
|                    | Name:                      | Lawrence Williams, Jr.                             
|                    | Title:                     | Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA NO. DA-2 1 -0 2 3 0

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ DEPOSI TORS I N SURANCE COMPANY a nd SARA THARP, Pl a i nti ff/ R es po ndent,
v s . PATRI CK SANDI DGE, Defenda nt/ A ppel l a nt. GRANT OF EXTENSI ON

UPON Ap p el l an t s ’ Un o p p os edM o t i on fo r Ex t en s i o no f Ti m e m ad e p u rs u an t t o M .R.Ap p .P., Ru l e 2 6 , an dfo r g oo dcau s e ap p eari n g: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED thatAp p el lan t s s h al l b e g ran teda 3 0-d ay
ex t en s i o n fro m

th e cu rren td ead l i n e o f J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 2 1 , wi th in wh i ch t o fi l e h i s
o p en in g b ri ef. Ap p el l an t s’ b ri ef i s n o w du e o n o r b efo re Au g us t1 1 , 2 0 2 1
. DATED th i s

_

_ _ d ay o f J u l y 2 0 2 1

_

_ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Cl erko f t h e M o n t an a Sup rem e Co u rt cc: Geo ffrey C. An g el , Es q . Sco ttGrat t o n, Es q . Ad am Sh aw, Es q . Pau l Haffem an , Es q . St ep h an ie Ho l lar, Es q .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 6 2021

07/06/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0230
#### John T. PICKERING-GEORGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-5384.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 18, 2011.

John T. Pickering-George, Bronx, NY, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

*359BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 12, 2010, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying as futile appellant’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. *See Foman v. Davis,*371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). In the memorandum opinion and order filed September 7, 2010, the district court dismissed without prejudice appellant’s 145-page complaint because it did not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). *See Ciralsky v. CIA,*355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). The district court correctly determined that the amended complaint, containing lists of legal terms and topics, also failed to give the defendants “fair notice of what the claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” *Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,*550 U.S. 544, 550, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (internal quotation marks and ellipsis omitted). To comply with Rule 8(a), the complaint should identify the “circumstances, occurrences, and events” that support the claim for relief. *Id.*at 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (citation omitted).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2826 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2826

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
                  In the Senate of the United States,

                       October 3 (legislative day, September 12), 1994.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2826) entitled ``An Act to provide for an investigation of the 
whereabouts of the United States citizens and others who have been 
missing from Cyprus since 1974'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES CITIZENS MISSING FROM CYPRUS.

    (a) Investigation.--As soon as is practicable, the President shall 
undertake, in cooperation with appropriate international organizations 
or nongovernmental organizations, a thorough investigation of the 
whereabouts of the United States citizens who have been missing from 
Cyprus since 1974. Any information on others missing from Cyprus that 
is learned or discovered during this investigation shall be reported to 
the appropriate international or nongovernmental organizations. The 
investigation shall focus on the countries and communities which were 
combatants in Cyprus in 1974, all of which currently receive United 
States foreign assistance.
    (b) Report to the Families.--The President shall report the 
findings of this investigation of the missing Americans to the family 
of each of the United States citizens. Such reports shall include the 
whereabouts of the missing.
    (c) Report to the Congress.--The information learned or discovered 
during this investigation shall be reported to the Congress.
    (d) Returning the Missing.--The President, in cooperation with 
appropriate international organizations or nongovernmental 
organizations, shall do everything possible to return to their 
families, as soon as is practicable, the United States citizens who 
have been missing from Cyprus since 1974, and others who have been 
missing, including returning the remains of those who are no longer 
alive.
            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
2009-1577.

#### State v. McGrath.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92971. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Metz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
 Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 5, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory S. Metz                    
|                  |  |  |  | Gregory S. Metz Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard
contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWHEQ, INC.
                  CWHEQ HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2007-S3
           HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-S3


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                    Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00593-CV

A. B. a/k/a A. L. B. a/k/a A. B. a/k/a M. S., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-FM-18-005046, THE HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant A.B. a/k/a A.L.B. a/k/a A.B. a/k/a M.S. filed her notice of appeal on

August 27, 2019. The appellate record was complete September 10, 2019, making appellant’s 

brief due September 30, 2019. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing 

deadlines. Therefore, we order counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than October 22, 2019. 

If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why she should not 

be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on October 8, 2019.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                136
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       5,900
<ALLOWANCES>                          235
<INVENTORY>                        13,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   19,927
<PP&E>                              5,801
<DEPRECIATION>                      3,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     24,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              10,498
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               39
<OTHER-SE>                         11,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       24,797
<SALES>                            21,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   21,069
<CGS>                              14,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      14,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    4,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1564
<INCOME-TAX>                        (756)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 2,320
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .63
        


</TABLE>
**         1989    1990    1991    1992    1993    1994    1995    Loans    70.6      87.8      78.8      56.5      31      13.5      2.4    Other Real Estate    14.6      18.1      17.1      12.9      6      2.1      0.8    Investments    19.8      28.8      18.3      18.3      11.5      3.4      1.3    Other Assets    7.9      12      16.2      16.8      15.3      6      3.2    Totals    112.9      146.7      130.4      104.5      63.8      25      7.7**

          Source: Reports from FDIC Division of Finance

Back to Chart
APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS

Administrative Law Judge for the FDIC 07/19/2018

Position to which Appointed) {Date Appointed)

Federal Deposit insurance Corporation Washington, D.C.

(Department or Agency} {Bureau or Division} (Place of Employment)

|, Christopher B. McNeil , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that--

A. OATH OF OFFICE

| will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
that | will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that | take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that | will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on
which | am about to enter. So help me God

B. AFFIDAVIT AS TO STRIKING AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

lam not participating in any strike against the Government of the United States or any agency thereof,
and | will not so participate while an employee of the Government of the United States or any agency
thereof.

C. AFFIDAVIT AS TO THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF OFFICE Dye)

{ have not, nor has anyone acting in my behalf, given, transferred, promised or paid any consideration for

or in expectation or hope of receiving assistance in securing this appointment.

(Signature of Appointee)

Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this day of July , 2018
KbX6)
at Arlington Virginia
(City) (State)
(SEAL)
(Signature of Officer
Commission expires Assistant Executive Secretary
(lf by a Notary Public, the date of his/her Commission should be shown) CTitley

Note - if the appointee objects to the form of the oath on religious grounds, certain modifications may be permitted pursuant to the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Please contact your agency's legal counsel for advice.

Standard Form 61
U.S. Office of Personnel Management Revised August 2002
The Guide fo Processing Personnel Actions NSN 7540-00-634-4015 previous editions not usable