alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

                                                   /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Gerald S. Blaskie
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Superconductive Components, Inc., and will be retained by
Superconductive Components, Inc., and furnished to the Security and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2523 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2523

  To amend section 2119 of title 18, United States Code, to authorize 
imposition of the death penalty if death results from a carjacking, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 1993

  Mr. Canady introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 2119 of title 18, United States Code, to authorize 
imposition of the death penalty if death results from a carjacking, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL PENALTIES FOR AUTOMOBILE ROBBERY.

    Section 2119 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
``Sec. 2119. Motor vehicles
    ``(a) Definition.--In this section, `covered motor vehicle' means a 
motor vehicle that has been transported, shipped, or received in 
interstate or foreign commerce.
    ``(b) Offenses.--A person who, while in possession of a firearm (as 
defined in section 921) or other weapon or dangerous device--
            ``(1) intentionally strikes or otherwise makes physical 
        contact with a covered motor vehicle with a motor vehicle 
        operated by the person, with any other thing, or with any part 
        of the person's body, in one of the circumstances described in 
        subsection (c); or
            ``(2) takes a covered motor vehicle from the person or 
        presence of another by force and violence or by intimidation, 
        or attempts to do so,
shall be punished under subsection (d).
    ``(c) Circumstances in Which Offense Occurs.--The circumstances 
referred to in subsection (b)(1) are that--
            ``(1) the person makes the contact with the intent to 
        injure an occupant of the motor vehicle or to take or cause 
        damage to the motor vehicle or anything in the motor vehicle; 
        or
            ``(2) in the course of events immediately following the 
        contact, an occupant of the motor vehicle is injured or the 
        motor vehicle or anything in it is taken or damaged.
    ``(d) Penalties.--A person who violates subsection (b) shall--
            ``(1) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 
        15 years, or both;
            ``(2) if serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) 
        results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 
        25 years, or both; and
            ``(3) if death results, be fined under this title or 
        imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both, or 
        sentenced to death.''.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5271]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 30, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Rivoli BanCorp, Inc., Macon, Georgia; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring at least 80 percent of the voting shares of Rivoli 
Bank & Trust, Macon, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 28, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-5271 Filed 3-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
2009-1840.

#### State v. Richardson.

Hamilton App. No. C-080435.
#### SYNQOR, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ASTEC America, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Bel Fuse, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and Cherokee International Corp. and Lineage Power Corp., Defendants-Appellants, and Delta Electronics, Inc., Delta Products Corp., Murata Electronics North America, Inc., Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Murata Power Solutions, Inc., and Power-One, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 2011-1191, 2011-1192, 2011-1193, 2011-1194.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 1, 2011.

*321Before LINN, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Lineage Power Corporation and Cherokee International Corporation (Lineage) submit a motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

SynQor, Inc. is directed to respond no later than February 7, 2011. The injunction is temporarily stayed to the extent that it applies to products specified on page 20 of Lineage’s motion that Lineage asserts are sold to Cisco Systems, Inc., Cray, Inc., Radisys Corporation, Entera-sys Networks, Fujitsu, and Juniper pending this court’s consideration of the papers submitted.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6012** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ZHIVAGO ANWAH ROBINSON, a/k/a Anwah, a/k/a Anwar , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 0:08

- cr - 00401

- CMC

- 2; 0:11

- cv - 02019

- CMC )

Submitted : May 31 , 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Zhivago Anwah Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Zalkin Hitt, Assistant United States Attorney, James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Car olina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zhivago Anwah Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appe alable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2 ) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDani el , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability an d dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
2009-1655.

#### State v. Krug.

Lake App. No. 2008-L-085, 2009-Ohio-3815. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1416, 2009-Ohio-6816, 919 N.E.2d 215. On motions for reconsideration and for transmittal of supplementation of the record on appeal. Motions denied.
Exhibit 10.32
 Letter Agreement  Action Required
 
   
    rd




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required
   
    
    a lump sum severance payment equal to one year of your then current annual rate of base
salary;
    
    a lump sum severance payment equal to your then current annual target bonus;
    
    a lump sum severance payment equal to your target bonus for the year in which your
employment terminates, pro-rated based upon the number of days you were employed with the
Company during the year of termination and for which you have not otherwise received or
been eligible for a bonus, and in lieu of any other bonus for the year of termination,
except as set forth in this agreement;
    
    continuation of your health plan coverage through the end of the month in which your
last date of employment occurs. Thereafter, you will be eligible to continue health plan
coverage pursuant to the terms of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
(COBRA). If you elect to continue health plan coverage pursuant to COBRA, the Company
will subsidize your COBRA payments for the first twelve (12) months so that you will pay
the same monthly premiums as active employees for the same coverage; provided, however,
that if you are eligible for another group health plan coverage prior to the end of this
period, the Company shall not be responsible for any further payments; provided, further,
however, that the Company may, in its sole discretion, provide you with a lump sum payment
in lieu of providing a COBRA subsidy. Thereafter, you will be responsible for the full
payment of any COBRA premiums through the remainder of your eligibility; and
    
    outplacement benefits pursuant to Company policy.




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required
      
  /s/ James P. Shaughnessy
    
    
    
    14-August-2007James P. Shaughnessy
    
    
    
    Date




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required
 ADDENDUM TO LETTER AGREEMENT:
 Definitions
   provided provided further th th
 Restrictive Covenants
 Non-Competition




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required
   Confidentiality
  provided
 provided




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required
  Intellectual Property




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required
   Specific Performance
  Cooperation with Litigation
  Survival
  Miscellaneous
 Governing Law




---



##### 



Letter Agreement  Action Required
 Amendments
 No Waiver
 Severability
 Assignment ab initio
 Set Off; No Mitigation
 Restrictions on Practice of Law e.g.
#### LACKAWANNA TRANSPORT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA; Wetzel County Solid Waste Authority; Public Service Commissioner Michael Albert, in his official capacity; Public Service Commissioner Jon W. McKinney, in his official capacity; Public Service Commissioner Ed Staats, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1432.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 5, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 24, 2011.

*673Patrick J. McDermott, McDermott & Bonenberger, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia; Albert A. DeGennaro, William F. Fox, Jr., Lackawanna Transport Company, Audubon, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Thomas E. Buck, Jason P. Pockl, Bailey & Wyant, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia; Silas B. Taylor, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lackawanna Transport Company appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss Lackawanna’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Lackawanna Transp. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm’n of W. Va.,*No. 5:08-cv-00066-FPS-JES, 2010 WL 1067409 (N.D. W. Va. March 16, 2010; 2010 WL 1960121, May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
From: FSIS User Information - FSIS

To: FSIS - All FSIS Employees

Subject: Updates to FSIS Mask Requirements

Date: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 5:37:11 PM

***** Please do not respond to this mailbox. Thank you. *****

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced this week Interim Public Health

Recommendations for Fully Vaccinated People in response to a national increase in COVID-19 cases

and hospitalizations due to the highly transmissible Delta variant. The CDC guidance recommends

that fully vaccinated people wear a mask in public indoor settings in areas of “substantial” or “high”

transmission.

Due to the highly dispersed nature of the FSIS workforce, FSIS is making a uniform change to mask

requirements for all FSIS field and headquarters employees. Effective immediately, all FSIS

employees are now required to wear a mask in Federal buildings, regulated establishments, retail

facilities, and government owned or leased vehicles regardless of vaccination status. Face masks

may only be removed while eating or if you are alone in an FSIS office or vehicle. As Secretary Vilsack

emphasized in his email message today, the CDC guidance and the highly contagious Delta variant

makes clear that masking indoors is the best practice and the safest thing to do.

There will be no change to requirements for wearing face shields. If you are fully vaccinated and

protective equipment is not required by the establishment or facility where you work, FSIS

employees are not required to wear a face shield. FSIS employees who are not fully vaccinated must

continue to wear a face shield and mask and practice social distancing.

We also want to emphasize that all three of the COVID-19 vaccines available in the US remain

effective against serious infection or death from COVID-19. Getting vaccinated is the most

important thing you can do to protect yourself and the people around you from the Delta variant

of COVID-19.

Paul Kiecker

FSIS Administrator

Terri Nintemann

FSIS Deputy Administrator

Lost/stolen laptop, Smartphone or other Personal Data Assistant (PDA) or Personally

Identifiable Information (PII) Incident? Immediately contact USDA at 1-877-Pii2You or

1-888-926-2373, 24 hours a day, and then contact the FSIS Service Desk at 1 (800) 473-

9135.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00197

- CR

R OYCE E DWARD W OOD

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 271st District Court

of Wise County ( CR23370 )

October 26, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s j ud gment. It is ordered that the trial court ’ s judgment

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Elizabeth Ke rr

_________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
<PAGE>
 


[LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP]

                                                                    
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 
333-04712, No. 333-03728, No. 33-89322, No. 33-72956 and No. 333-02903 of West 
Marine, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 20, 1998, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Marine, Inc. for the year ended January 3, 
1998.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 27, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS OF LEXINGTON HEALTH GROUP, INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,230
<PP&E>                                           2,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,913
<BONDS>                                          7,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,586
<SALES>                                         27,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    759
<INCOME-TAX>                                       270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.14
 PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT MARKED BY AN (***) HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
 AMENDMENT
  1.
    
    For the time period 1st of May 2010 to and including 30th of June
2011, the reference to (***) MPS Transactions which appears twice in Section VI of
Schedule A to the Complimentary and Amendment Agreement dated 1st of July 2009,
is changed in both instances to (***) MPS Transactions. For clarification,
(***) MPS Transactions will apply again in both instances as of 1st of
July 2011.
 2.
    
    All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect except as
modified by the above.
  Amadeus IT Group, S.A.
    
    EBOOKERS LTD/s/ Stephane Durand
    
    /s/ Tamer TamarSignature
    
    SignatureName:
    
    Stephane Durand
    
    Name:
    
    Tamer TamarTitle:
    
    Director, Online & Leisure
    
    Title:
    
    PresidentDate:
    
    22/12/2010
    
    Date:
    
    16/12/2010
2009-0727.

#### State ex rel. O’Brien v. Heimlich.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-521, 2009-Ohio-1550.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry D. Key,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, John Hopkins, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                       /s/ Larry D. Key
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Larry D. Key, President and C.E.O.
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)



                                       /s/ John Hopkins
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John Hopkins, C.F.O.
                                       (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                       Officer)


November 12, 2003


                                       23