alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|

| **1** |
|-------|

***NEWS******   FROM***

**Petroleum Development Corporation**

** **

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:**  March 9, 2006

**CONTACT:**  Steven R. Williams - (304)842-3597   http://www.petd.com

**Petroleum Development Corporation Filesfor Extension of 10-K Filing Date**

Bridgeport, West Virginia... Petroleum Development Corporation (NASDAQ/NMS PETD) today announced that it will file an extension notification withthe SEC for its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005until March 31, 2006 to allow it additional time to complete the preparation ofits consolidated financial statements and the work required to completemanagement's assessment of internal controls over financial reporting inaccordance with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley and the rules of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board.  This extension is due, in part, to theadditional work required to complete the recently filed restatement of its 2004consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K/A and the 2005 first quarter consolidatedfinancial statements on Form 10-Q/A, and the subsequent filing of its secondand third quarter of 2005 Form 10-Q's, the last of which was completed January12, 2006.  By extending the filing, the Company expects to be able to file itscomplete Annual Report on Form 10-K by March 31, 2006.  The Company will issuea Earnings Press Release and schedule its Earnings Conference Call at the timeof the filing of the 10-K.

About Petroleum Development Corporation

Petroleum Development Corporation(www.petd.com) is an independent energy company engaged in the development,production and marketing of natural gas.  The Company operations are focused inthe Rocky Mountains with additional operations in the Appalachian Basin and Michigan. During the third quarter of 2004, the Company was added to the S&P SmallCap600 Index. Additionally, PDC was added to the Russell 3000 Index of companiesin 2003.  PDC was named on the FSB: Fortune Small Business Magazine list of America's 100 Fastest-Growing Small Companies in 2001 and 2002.  

Certainmatters discussed within this press release are forward-looking statementswithin the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.Although PDC believes the expectations reflected in such forward- looking statementsare based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that itsexpectations will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results todiffer materially from expectations include financial performance, oil and gasprices, drilling program results, drilling results, regulatory changes, changesin local or national economic conditions and other risks detailed from time totime in the Company's reports filed with the SEC, including quarterly reportson Form 10-Q, reports on Form 8-K and annual reports on Form 10-K.

###

**103 East Main Street • P. O. Box26 • Bridgeport, West Virginia • Phone:  (304) 842-3597**
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2754

To extend until January 1, 1998, the previously existing suspension of duty

on lactulose.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1993

Mr. GINGRICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1998, the previously existing

suspension of duty on lactulose.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON LACTULOSE.

5 Heading 9902.30.03 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

7 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/97’’.
2

•HR 2754 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

4 enactment of this Act.

5 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

7 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro8 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

10 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend11 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act;

15 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

16 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

17 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

18 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

19 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |  |  |
| /s/ Barton Brookman                               |   | May 7, 2020 |
| Barton Brookman                                   |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |   |   |
| (principal executive officer)                     |   |   |
|                                              |   |   |
| /s/ R. Scott Meyers                               |   | May 7, 2020 |
| R. Scott Meyers                                   |   |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (principal financial officer)                     |   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   181
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       181
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,529)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Self-Employment Questionnaire.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: AA-4.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0138.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: June 30, 2001.
    (5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or Households.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 600.
    (8) Total annual responses: 600.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 415.
    (10) Collection description: Section 2 of the Railroad Retirement 
Act provides for payment of annuities to qualified employees and their 
spouses. Work for a Last Pre-Retirement Nonrailroad Employer (LPE) and 
work in self-employment affect payment in different ways. This 
collection obtains information to determine whether claimed self-
employment is really self-employment, and not work for a railroad or 
LPE.

Additional Information or Comments

    Copies of the forms and supporting documents can be obtained from 
Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments 
regarding the information collection should be addressed to Ronald J. 
Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, Joe Lackey (202-395-7316), 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10230, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-5073 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Secretary
 The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary will periodically publish summaries of proposed information collections projects and solicit public comments in compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. To request more information on the project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans and instruments, call the OS Reports Clearance Officer on (202) 690-6207. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Proposed Projects 1. State Children's Health Insurance Program Focus Group Study—NEW—As part of an evaluation of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation is proposing the collection of qualitative data by conducting a series of 52 focus groups in nine states. The 52 focus groups comprised of low income families will each consist of 8-10 participants. The purpose of this study is to identify factors which influence enrollment in, and disenrollment from Medicaid and SCHIP. Activity
Number of ­respondents
Time per ­response 
                             (minutes)
Frequency
Total burden 
                             (hours)Screen
6,240
6
1
624Registration Form
468
5
1
39Focus Group
468
150
1
1,170Total



1,833
 Send comments to Cynthia Agens Bauer, OS Reports Clearance Officer, Room 503H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Dated: February 21, 2001. Kerry Weems, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.


[FR Doc. 01-4926 Filed 3-2-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4154-05-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7860

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HOSEA FANADISE HAMPTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-99-320, CA-02-324-1)

Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 13, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hosea Fanadise Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Hosea Fanadise Hampton seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by

the district court that Hampton has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v.

Hampton, Nos. CR-99-320; CA-02-324-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[No. 57561-9-I.

Division One.

October 1, 2007.]

#### Old Country Bakery, *Respondent,*v. Gagik Vartanyan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-2-17003-4, Jim Rogers, J., entered December 9, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge RIVERA-RAMIREZ, also known as Enrique Melgoza-Camacho, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41396

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*386PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Rivera-Ramirez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Acres Gaming Incorporated (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "FORM 10-K"), I,
Floyd W. Glisson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 30, 2002

                                            /s/ Floyd W. Glisson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Floyd W. Glisson
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       5
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Torrance JONES, a/k/a Tube, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-7244.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 19, 2011.

Torrance Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Torrance Jones appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking an order requiring the probation officer to turn over witness statements used to prepare his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *659error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Jones v. United States,*No. 5:96-cr-00079-BO-1, 2010 WL 3063285 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS

2008-1781.

#### State v. Smith.

Greene App. No. 07-CA-47, 2008-Ohio-3717. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-Ohio-6426, 920 N.E.2d 949. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DAVID AVILES-PADILLA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50278

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00910-GAF-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

David Aviles-Padilla appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month

sentence imposed for being an illegal alien found in the United States following

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

FILED

JUN 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50278

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Aviles-Padilla’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity

to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062

(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it

delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b). See United States v.

Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to

delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, all pending

motions are DENIED, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and the case

is REMANDED.
#### Fely C. ABELLA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73365.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Crisostomo G. Ibarra, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., Don G. Scroggin, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fely C. Abella, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 600 & n. 7 (9th Cir.2006) (this court has jurisdiction to review cases “in which the BIA rules that a motion to reopen fails to satisfy procedural standards”). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *See Konstantinova v. INS,*195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying the motion to reopen because petitioner failed to submit new or previously unavailable evidence of her eligibility for suspension of deportation. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(a) & (c); *Bhasin v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 977, 984 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| Commercial        Loans Mortgage        LoansOther        LoansREOJudgmentsSecuritiesOther Assets72.2%    10.3%4.1%3.1%5.2%1.0%4.1%
                      Source: Reports from FDIC Division of Finance

Back to Chart
 19811982198319841985Other6065976401,1181,684Liquidation4297781,1532,1583,318    Supervision    2,3592,1292,0531,8002,123Total3,3943,5043,8465,0767,125

                      Source: FDIC, 2001 Annual Report

Back          to Chart |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|