alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 00N-1426]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Emergency Health Surveys” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 30, 2000 (65 FR 64716), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0457.  The approval expires on February 28, 2002.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.*

Dated:  February 23, 2001.

William K. Hubbard,

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.

[FR Doc. 01-5074 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dustin T. PERRIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 13-30228, 13-30230.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 11, 2014.

Pamela Jackson Byerly, Assistant U.S., Rolf Harry Tangvald, Assistant U.S., *506USSP-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew Campbell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Dustin T. Perrin appeals from two consecutive sentences of one year and a day imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Perrin contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain adequately the sentences imposed. We review for plain error, *see United States v. Miqbel,*444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2006), and find none. The record reflects that the court heard Perrin’s arguments and imposed the consecutive sentences as a sanction for Perrin’s breach of trust. *See id.*at 1182. Moreover, Perrin has not shown a reasonable probability that he would have received a different sentence had the district court provided a more thorough explanation of the sentence. *See United States v. Dallman,*533 F.3d 755, 762 (9th Cir.2008).

Perrin next contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the mitigating factors, including his drug addiction, and because the district court put undue weight on the need to protect the public. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Perrin’s sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The within-Guidelines consecutive sentences are substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors, and the totality of the circumstances, including Perrin’s repeated violations of supervised release. *See id.; see also United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez,*587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir.2009) (“The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the district court.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS
     SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE
SHEETS AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  FOUND ON PAGES 1, 2 AND 3 OF
THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO- DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                             71,544
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,680,182
<ALLOWANCES>                      136,162
<INVENTORY>                     3,370,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,655,857
<PP&E>                          4,521,331
<DEPRECIATION>                  2,065,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,555,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,572,044
<BONDS>                         1,779,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           55,406
<OTHER-SE>                      2,149,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,555,851
<SALES>                         6,927,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                6,927,408
<CGS>                           5,770,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,770,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,240,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                185,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (220,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (220,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (220,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(a)
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Kevin L. BarnettKevin L. BarnettPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Lawrence Williams, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Gateway Certifications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |                            |                                                     |  | 
|--------------------- | -------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |                            |                                                    
|Dated: March 31, 2008 | /s/ Lawrence Williams, Jr. |                                                    
|                      | Name:                      | Lawrence Williams, Jr.                             
|                      | Title:                     | Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Kuldip SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75093.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Teresa Salazar, Law Offices of Martin Resendez Guajardo, A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David P. Cora, Counterterrorism Section, U.S. D.O.J., Criminal Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kuldip Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribar*
      *649
      *ria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion as untimely because it was filed over two years after the BIA issued its final order of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motions to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the entry of a final administrative order of removal). The evidence Singh submitted did not establish materially changed circumstances in India to qualify for an exception to the filing deadline. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii); *Malty v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir.2004) (requiring circumstances to “have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future persecution”).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its *sua sponte*authority to reopen proceedings, and we are not persuaded by Singh’s attempt to circumvent this jurisdictional bar. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002) (noting that “the decision of the BIA whether to invoke its *sua sponte*authority is committed to its unfettered discretion”) (italics and internal citations omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
---

**EXHIBIT 8.0**  List of
Subsidiaries

|Name                           | Jurisdiction     | Business                               | % of Ownership
|------------------------------ | ---------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------------
|                               |                  |                                        |               
|TAG Oil (NZ) Limited           | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration                | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                        |               
|TAG Oil (Canterbury) Limited   | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration                | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                        |               
|Cheal Petroleum Limited        | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration and production | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                        |               
|PEP 38757 Limited              | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration                | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                        |               
|PEP 38758 Limited              | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration                | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                        |               
|Durum Energy (PNG) Limited (1) | Papua New Guinea | Oil and gas exploration                | 100%          

| | (1) | During the 2004 fiscal year Durum Energy (PNG) Limited
      ceased operations and is in the process of being wound up and
      deregistered.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
[ARTICLE]      5
 
EXHIBIT 10.33
 
 
February 17, 1999
 
Bari Abdul
1401 Red Hawk Cir. M107
Fremont, CA  94538
 
Dear Bari:
 
This is to confirm ONSALE's offer of employment to you as Vice President
of Marketing at $145,000 per year, paid semi-monthly, starting March 1,
1999.
 
You will participate in ONSALE's standard benefits package as amended
from time to time. This includes a 401K plan and health insurance for
yourself. You may, at your expense, purchase coverage for additional
family members under this plan.
 
You will also receive stock options for 60,000 shares of ONSALE common
stock, subject to board approval, which will vest monthly over a four-
year period after a six-month "cliff".  The stock option price will be
based on the closing price the day prior to the commencement of your
employment with ONSALE.
 
You will participate in a quarterly bonus program that will be
contingent upon the sucessful completion of objectives we will mutually
agree upon.  We will develop these measurable and timebound objectives
shortly after your official start date.  The maximum potential of this
program will be capped at 20% of your annual salary, paid quarterly, and
may be amended on an annual basis going forward.
 
You will be reimbursed up to $5,000 for moving expenses.  Receipts must
be submitted for reimbursement.
 
You will be required to sign a standard Employee Inventions and
Assignment Agreement and an Acknowledgement and Receipt of ONSALE's
Employee Handbook.
 
Your employment will at all times be `at will', which means that you or
ONSALE can terminate your employment at any time with or without cause.
There will be no express or implied agreements to the contrary.
 
This offer is contingent upon the completion of the background check.
 
Please sign and return a copy of this letter to indicate your acceptance
of these terms. I look forward to working with you to make ONSALE a
success.
 
This offer expires if not signed and returned by 5:00 p.m. on February
19,1999.
 
 
Sincerely,
 
 
_________________________                    ___________________________
Jerry  Kaplan                                Bari Abdul        Date
CEO
| **Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation Additional Information (Details)** | Mar. 31, 2020 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| **Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]** |          |
| Oil and gas producing wells, gross                                                  | 3,900         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The total number of producing oil and natural gas wells in which the entity owns an working interest.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**pdce_OilAndGasProducingWellsGross**Namespace Prefix:**pdce_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_OrganizationConsolidationAndPresentationOfFinancialStatementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                       696
<INVENTORY>                                     63,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,316
<PP&E>                                         315,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                 131,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 408,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,852
<BONDS>                                          1,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,330
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   408,808
<SALES>                                        111,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,488
<CGS>                                           85,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,098
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1655-1656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-301-012]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

January 3, 2001.
    Take notice that on December 21, 2000, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to become effective 
December 1, 2000:

First Revised Sheet No. 14O
First Revised Sheet No. 14P

    ANR is filing the attached tariff sheets to reflect a change in the 
delivery point underlying the negotiated rate contracts with Reliant 
Energy Services (Reliant) and Dynegy Marketing & Trade (Dynegy) which 
were previously accepted by Commission's Letter Order issued September 
27, 2000. ANR requests that the Commission grant ANR any waivers of the 
Commission's regulations which are necessary in order to make these 
tariff sheets effective as of December 1, 2000. A copy of this filing 
is being mailed to the affected shippers and to each of ANR's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2 
customers, and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions

[[Page 1656]]

or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-523 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M