alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wade
Mezey, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-K for Mezey Howarth Racing Stables,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the periods covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;




and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.








Date:
April 15, 2008











/s/ Wade
Mezey


--------------------------


Wade
Mezey


Chief
Financial Officer (Interim)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MANFRED BRECKER,

Appellant,

v.

DELAIRE COUNTRY CLUB, INC.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1648

[ November 27, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; G. Joseph Curley

, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No.

502017CA009045 XXXXMB

.

Stephen J. Padula and Joshua A. Widlansky of Padula Bennardo

Levine, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellant.

James N. Krivok of James N. Krivok, P.A., Stuart, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., M AY

, J., and P HILLIPS

, C AROL

- L ISA

, Associate Judge , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
    2007-3 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, Deutsche Bank
    National Trust Company, as Custodian, LaSalle Bank, National
    Association, as Custodian, Newport Management Corporation, as
    Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC, U.S. Bank National Association,
    as Custodian, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian, and Westlake Settlement Services, LLC, as
    Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    E. Todd Whittemore

    Executive Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CEO Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)



I, Neil Chan, certify that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), the 10-K report for IGEN Networks for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the IGEN Networks.







|April 17, 2018                                                                                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                                                                            | 
|*/s/ Neil Chan*                                                                                                                             | 
|Neil Chan,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2001 / Notices 12971

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy

Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),

Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the

Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy

Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New

York.

DATES: The meeting will be held

Wednesday, March 28, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eileen Cain at 1–888–912–1227 or 718–

488–3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is

hereby given pursuant to Section

10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988)

that an operational meeting of the

Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held

Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 6 p.m. to

9:20 p.m. at the Internal Revenue

Service Brooklyn Building located at

625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201.

For more information or to confirm

attendance, notification of intent to

attend the meeting must be made with

Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain can be reached

at 1–888–912–1227 or 718–488–3555.

The public is invited to make oral

comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9:20 p.m.

on Wednesday, March 28, 2001.

Individual comments will be limited

to 5 minutes. If you would like to have

the CAP consider a written statement,

please call 1–888–912–1227 or 718–

488–3555, or write Eileen Cain, CAP

Office, P.O. Box R, Brooklyn, NY,

11201. The Agenda will include the

following: various IRS issues.

Note: Last minute changes to the agenda

are possible and could prevent effective

advance notice.

Dated: February 16, 2001.

Cathy VanHorn,

National Project Manager, Taxpayer

Advocate Service.

[FR Doc. 01–4778 Filed 2–28–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1999

MARK T. GRANT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00007-MFU)

Submitted: June 22, 2020 Decided: June 29, 2020

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark T. Grant, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Collins, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 

FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Mark T. Grant appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2018) complaint.

*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. City of 

Roanoke, No. 7:16-cv-00007-MFU (W.D. Va. July 18, 2017; Nov. 7, 2017; and Mar. 19, 

2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court determined that Grant was entitled to reopening of his time to 

file an appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The City does not challenge this finding on 

appeal. Accordingly, we deny the City’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*March 23, 2010*

[Cite as *03/23/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-1106.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2009-1292.

#### State ex rel. Doner v. Logan.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On October 23, 2009, the court referred this case to a master commissioner for the limited purpose of receiving evidence and making all necessary determinations and rulings in regard thereto.

Upon consideration of the motion to extend the presentation of evidence and briefing schedule,

It is ordered that the motion is granted. The parties shall file their evidence no later than June 1, 2010. This entry does not resolve or rule on the issues in the parties’ memoranda regarding discovery or the admissibility of evidence; such issues should be resolved by the parties or raised by an appropriate motion.

No further extensions of time will be granted except upon a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

Cdpp, J., not participating.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 24, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1528 Lower Tribunal Nos. F03-11507, F03-11499

________________ 

### Kahlil Clayton, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge. Thomas Neusom (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Ryland v. State, No. 3D22-1983, 2023 WL 2903411 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 12, 2023).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817 (j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors.   Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank                           ( print page 371)                        indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than January 16, 2001.                

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  First Paris Limited Partnership*, Little Rock, Arkansas; to acquire voting shares of First Paris Holding Company, Little Rock, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First National Bank at Paris, Paris, Arkansas.                

*2.  Lake Hamilton Enterprises Limited Partnership*, Little Rock Arkansas; to acquire voting shares of Lake Hamilton Enterprises, Inc., Little Rock, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Cleburne County Bank, Heber Springs, Arkansas, and The Bank of Harrisburg, Harrisburg, Arkansas.                

**B.  Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis**                     (JoAnne F. Lewellen, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

*1.  Jeffrey Campbell*, Dunseith, North Dakota; to acquire voting shares of Security Bancshares, Inc., Dunseith, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Security State Bank, Dunseith, North Dakota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 27, 2000.

Jennifer J. Johnson

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-53 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-06-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-05-1997
<CASH>                                       5,057,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,167,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,385,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,791,975
<PP&E>                                       1,740,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                 855,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,703,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,020,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,687
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,646,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,703,658
<SALES>                                     16,642,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,642,491
<CGS>                                       10,613,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,613,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,382,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             319,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,056,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,056,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,056,154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles James CHATMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derral G. ADAMS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-16517.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 2011.

Filed Jan. 18, 2011.

Charles James Chatman, Susanville, CA, pro se.

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Charles Chatman, a California state prisoner, appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983*152action as time-barred. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Chatman is correct, as the State concedes, that California’s new two-year statute of limitations applies to his claims. Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 335.1; *see also Friel v. Cessna Aircraft Co.,*751 F.2d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir.1985) (per curiam). He is also correct, as the district court recognized, that he is entitled to two years of statutory tolling due to his status as a prisoner. Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 352.1(a). However, unless saved by equitable tolling, his complaint was still untimely.

Chatman contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for the period during which the Northern District of California erroneously denied him permission to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) in another, unrelated § 1983 action. The Northern District’s order in Chatman’s other case had nothing to do with the present case. Chatman’s argument that he should get tolling pursuant to *Addison v. California,*21 Cal.3d 313, 146 Cal.Rptr. 224, 578 P.2d 941 (1978), which permits tolling the statute of limitations for a claim while a plaintiff pursues alternative legal remedies for that same claim, fails because Chatman was not pursuing any alternative remedy for the claim in this case at the times in question. Furthermore, his assertion that he is entitled to tolling due to “impossibility” under *Lewis v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County,*175 Cal.App.3d 366, 220 Cal.Rptr. 594 (Cal.Ct.App.1985), loses because, as noted already, the order in the other lawsuit did not purport to prohibit Chatman from filing a complaint in this case.

Chatman also contends that he is entitled to tolling during the period when he was exhausting his mandatory administrative remedies. We agree that Chatman is entitled to some such tolling. *See Elkins v. Derby,*12 Cal.3d 410, 115 Cal.Rptr. 641, 525 P.2d 81, 83-84 (1974); *see also Brown v. Valoff,*422 F.3d 926, 942-43 (9th Cir.2005). But we need not determine how much tolling is warranted, because even assuming Chatman is entitled to the full time he seeks, he still filed his complaint over six months too late.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q/A of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report), I, Kendra A. Borrego, Chief Financial Officer of IMPAC Medical
Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc..
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                         
|-------------- |  | ------------------------
|April 16, 2004 |  | /s/    KENDRA A. BORREGO
|               |  | Kendra A. Borrego       
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer
# FEB2024
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaStar Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Gregory S. Metz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/    GREGORY S.
METZ 
|Gregory S. Metz        
|Chief Financial Officer



August 5, 2005



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.