alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                                    /s/ Stephen J. Boyle
                                                    -----------------------
                                             Name:  Stephen J. Boyle
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 5, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Banknorth Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Banknorth Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bruce E. KENNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-7378.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2007.

Decided: March 28, 2007.

Bruce E. Kenney, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*281PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Kenney seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kenney has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Kenney’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) (2000). Kenney’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                          74,429
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   23,908
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     921,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,019,529
<PP&E>                          98,682
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,136,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,627,729
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        144
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,491,012)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,136,861
<SALES>                         579,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                579,790
<CGS>                           496,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   561,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              53,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (530,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (530,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (530,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.04)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                               BROOKSTONE, INC.
                                        
           Computation of Primary and Fully Diluted Earnings (Loss)
                               PER COMMON SHARE
                     (In thousands, except per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Thirteen Weeks Ended                    Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
                                          -----------------------------------       -----------------------------------
                                          November 1, 1997   November 2, 1996       November 1, 1997   November 2, 1996
                                          ----------------   ----------------       ----------------   ----------------
 <S>                                       <C>                <C>                     <C>                <C>
Net loss                                     $ (3,733)           $(3,281)               $ (7,964)          $ (7,474) 
                                             ========           ========                ========           ======== 
Weighted average number of common                                                                                    
 shares outstanding                             7,775              7,681                   7,775              7,681  
                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                     
Adjustments to weighted average common                                                                               
 shares outstanding:                                                                                                 
Common stock issued upon exercise of                                                                                 
 options                                           27                 80                      19                 53  
                                             --------           --------                --------           -------- 
Weighted average number of common                                                                                    
 shares as adjusted                             7,802              7,761                   7,794              7,734  
                                             ========           ========                ========           ========
Net loss primary and fully diluted                                                                                   
 earnings per share                          $  (0.48)          $  (0.42)               $  (1.02)          $  (0.97)  
                                             ========           ========                ========           ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Mitchell Rubenstein, Chief Executive Officer of Hollywood Media Corp. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Mitchell RubensteinMitchell Rubenstein, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2748

AN ACT

To amend the Small Business Development Center

Program, and for other purposes.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2748

AN ACT

To amend the Small Business Development Center Program,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2748 EH

1 That section 21(c)(7) of the Small Business Act (15

2 U.S.C. 648) is amended by striking ‘‘system which will’’

3 and by inserting in lieu thereof the following: ‘‘system.

4 Subject to amounts approved in advance in appropriations

5 acts, the Administration may make grants or enter cooper6 ative agreements with one or more centers to carry out

7 the provisions of this paragraph. Said grants or coopera8 tive agreements shall be awarded for periods of no more

9 than five years duration. The matching funds provisions

10 of subsection (a) shall not be applicable to grants to coop11 erative agreements under this paragraph. The system

12 shall’’.

13 (b) Section 25(i) of the Small Business Act (15

14 U.S.C. 652) is amended by striking ‘‘$8,000,000 for fiscal

15 year 1993’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$2,000,000

16 for each of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996’’.

17 (c) Section 223 of the Small Business Credit and

18 Business Opportunity Enhancement Act of 1992 (106

19 Stat. 986) is amended by striking the last sentence of sub20 section (b).

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


ARMS Initiative Implementation

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
next meeting of the Armament Retooling and Manufacturing Support (ARMS) 
Executive Advisory Committee (EAC). The EAC encourages the development 
of new and innovative methods to optimize the asset value of the 
Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated ammunition industrial base for 
peacetime and national emergency requirements, while promoting 
economical and efficient processes at minimal operating costs, 
retention of critical skills, community economic benefits, and a 
potential model for defense conversion. This meeting will be hosted by 
the U.S. Army, Operations Support Command. The purpose of the meeting 
is to update the EAC and public on the status of ongoing actions, new 
items of interest, and suggested future direction/actions. Topics for 
this meeting will include--Strategic Planning for the ARMS Program; 
Legislative Issues Impacting the ARMS Program; Facility Contracting and 
Leasing; and ARMS Metrics. This meeting is open to the public.
    Dates of Meeting: March 28-29, 2001.
    Place of Meeting: Grand Casino Gulfport Hotel--Oasis Resort and 
Spa, 3215 West Beach Boulevard, Gulfport, MS 39501.
    Time of Meeting: 8:30 AM-5:00 PM on March 28 and 7:30 AM-12:30 PM 
on March 29.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mike Perez, U.S. Army Operations 
Support Command, Attn: AMSOS-CCM-E, Rock Island Arsenal, IL 61299; 
Phone (309) 782-3360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A block of rooms has been reserved at the 
Grand Casino Gulfport Hotel for the nights of 27-29 March 2001. The 
Grand Casino Gulfport Hotel is located at 3215 West Beach Boulevard, 
Gulfport, MS 39501, Local Phone (228) 870-7777. Please make your 
reservations by calling 800-354-2450. Be sure to mention Public/Private 
Task Force #22. Reserve your room prior to February 25th to get the 
Government Rate of $70.00 a night. Also notify this office of your 
attendance by notifying Mike Perez, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4b4a1b6a1bea984abb7a7eaa5b6a9bdeaa9ada8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1d1c4d3c4dbcce1ced2c28fc0d3ccd88fccc8cd">[email protected]</span></a>, 309-782-3360 
(DSN 793-3360). To insure adequate arrangements (transportation, 
conference facilities, etc.) for all attendees, we request your 
attendance notification with this office by March 1, 2001. Corporate 
casual is meeting attire.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4642 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARK BLAIR,

 Appellant,

v.

RITA GAIL BLAIR,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00304-CV

Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Reagan County, Texas

(TC# 1870)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We 

further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
2009-1680.

#### State v. Hatton.

Pickaway App. No. 97CA34.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory M. Krzemien, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mace Security
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: September 24, 2004

/s/ Gregory M. Krzemien
_______________________________
Name: Gregory M. Krzemien
Title: Chief Financial Officer
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, UnitedStates District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1621

___________ Hosie Edward Roberts, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court from the Western * District of Missouri. City of Columbia, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 6, 2001 Filed: March 9, 2001

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Hosie Edward Roberts, Jr., appeals following the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to his employer, the City of Columbia, Missouri, in his action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213; the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654; and the Missouri Human Rights A ct (MHRA), Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 213.010-213.137 (Supp. 1998). After de novo review, see Harvey v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. , 38 F.3d 968, 971 (8th Cir. 1994), we-2-

agree--for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough order--that Mr. Roberts, a diabetic, failed to show (1) that he was disabled within the meaning of the ADA, (2) that the City took adverse employment action against him on account of his taking FMLA leave, or (3) that the City created a hostile working environment to retaliate against him for complaining about the City’s allegedly discriminatory conduct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    200,000
<COMMON>                                         6,186
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,186
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,557
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
2009-1933.

#### In re T.D.

Preble App. No. CA2009-01-002, 2009-Ohio-4680.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,  Tad M. Ballantyne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Tad M. Ballantyne Mr. Tad M. Ballantyne Chief Financial Officer   1