Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2001 / Proposed Rules 13187

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2000–NM–229–AD]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell

Douglas DC–9–51 and DC–9–83 Series

Airplanes Modified by Supplemental

Type Certificate SA8026NM

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking

(NPRM).

SUMMARY: This document proposes the

adoption of a new airworthiness

directive (AD) that is applicable to all

McDonnell Douglas Model DC–9–51

and DC–9–83 series airplanes modified

by Supplemental Type Certificate

SA8026NM. This proposal would

require deactivation of the in-flight

entertainment (IFE) system and removal

of the system from the airplane. This

action is necessary to prevent the

inability of the flight crew to remove

power from the IFE system when

necessary. Inability to remove power

from the IFE system during a nonnormal or emergency situation could

result in inability to control smoke or

fumes in the airplane flight deck or

cabin. This action is intended to address

the identified unsafe condition.

DATES: Comments must be received by

April 16, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments in

triplicate to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), Transport

Airplane Directorate, ANM–114,

Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000–NM–

229–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,

Renton, Washington 98055–4056.

Comments may be inspected at this

location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00

p.m., Monday through Friday, except

Federal holidays. Comments may be

submitted via fax to (425) 227–1232.

Comments may also be sent via the

Internet using the following address: 9-

anm-nprmcomment@faa.gov. Comments

sent via fax or the Internet must contain

‘‘Docket No. 2000–NM–229–AD’’ in the

subject line and need not be submitted

in triplicate. Comments sent via the

Internet as attached electronic files must

be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for

Windows or ASCII text.

The service information referenced in

the proposed rule may be obtained from

Hollingsead International, Inc., 7416

Hollister Avenue, Goleta, California

93117. This information may be

examined at the FAA, Transport

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at

the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft

Certification Office, 3960 Paramount

Boulevard, Lakewood, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Mabuni, Aerospace Engineer,

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–

130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft

Certification Office, 3960 Paramount

Boulevard, Lakewood, California

90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5341;

fax (562) 627–5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested persons are invited to

participate in the making of the

proposed rule by submitting such

written data, views, or arguments as

they may desire. Communications shall

identify the Rules Docket number and

be submitted in triplicate to the address

specified above. All communications

received on or before the closing date

for comments, specified above, will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposals contained

in this action may be changed in light

of the comments received.

Submit comments using the following

format:

• Organize comments issue-by-issue.

For example, discuss a request to

change the compliance time and a

request to change the service bulletin

reference as two separate issues.

• For each issue, state what specific

change to the proposed AD is being

requested.

• Include justification (e.g., reasons or

data) for each request.

Comments are specifically invited on

the overall regulatory, economic,

environmental, and energy aspects of

the proposed rule. All comments

submitted will be available, both before

and after the closing date for comments,

in the Rules Docket for examination by

interested persons. A report

summarizing each FAA-public contact

concerned with the substance of this

proposal will be filed in the Rules

Docket.

Commenters wishing the FAA to

acknowledge receipt of their comments

submitted in response to this action

must submit a self-addressed, stamped

postcard on which the following

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to

Docket Number 2000–NM–229–AD.’’

The postcard will be date-stamped and

returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

Any person may obtain a copy of this

NPRM by submitting a request to the

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,

ANM–114, Attention: Rules Docket No.

2000–NM–229–AD, 1601 Lind Avenue,

SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056.

Discussion

The Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) recently completed a review of

in-flight entertainment (IFE) systems

certified by supplemental type

certificate (STC) and installed on

transport category airplanes. The review

focused on the interface between the IFE

system and airplane electrical system,

with the objective of determining if any

unsafe conditions exist with regard to

the interface. STC’s issued between

1992 and 2000 were considered for the

review.

The type of IFE systems considered

for review were those that contain video

monitors (cathode ray tubes or liquid

crystal displays; either hanging above

the aisle or mounted on individual seat

backs or seat trays), or complex circuitry

(i.e., power supplies, electronic

distribution boxes, extensive wire

routing, relatively high power

consumption, multiple layers of circuit

protection, etc.). In addition, in-seat

power supply systems that provide

power to more than 20 percent of the

total passenger seats were also

considered for the review. The types of

IFE systems not considered for review

include systems that provide only audio

signals to each passenger seat, ordinary

in-flight telephone systems (e.g., one

telephone handset per group of seats or

bulkhead-mounted telephones), systems

that only have a video monitor on the

forward bulkhead(s) (or a projection

system) to provide passengers with

basic airplane and flight information,

and in-seat power supply systems that

provide power to less than 20 percent of

the total passenger seats.

Items considered during the review

include the following:

• Can the electrical bus(es) supplying

power to the IFE system be deenergized

when necessary without removing

power from systems that may be

required for continued safe flight and

landing?

• Can IFE system power be removed

when required without pulling IFE

system circuit breakers? [i.e., is there a

switch (dedicated to the IFE system or

a combination of loads) located in the

flight deck or cabin that can be used to

remove IFE power?]

• If the IFE system requires changes

to flight crew procedures, has the

airplane flight manual (AFM) been

properly amended?

• If the IFE system requires changes

to cabin crew procedures, have they

been properly amended?

13188 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2001 / Proposed Rules

• Does the IFE system require

periodic or special maintenance?

In all, approximately 180 IFE systems

approved by STC were reviewed by the

FAA. The review results indicate that

potential unsafe conditions exist on

some IFE systems installed on various

transport category airplanes. These

conditions can be summarized as:

• Electrical bus(es) supplying power

to the IFE system cannot be deenergized

when necessary without removing

power from systems that may be

required for continued safe flight and

landing.

• Power cannot be removed from the

IFE system when required without

pulling IFE system circuit breakers (i.e.,

there is no switch dedicated to the IFE

system or combination of systems for

the purpose of removing power).

• Installation of the IFE system has

affected crew (flight crew and/or cabin

crew) procedures, but the procedures

have not been properly revised.

FAA’s Determination

As part of its review of IFE systems,

the FAA has determined that an unsafe

condition exists on McDonnell Douglas

Model DC–9–51 and DC–9–83 series

airplanes modified by STC SA8026NM.

While a means, other than pulling the

circuit breakers, exists to remove power

from the IFE system, the emergency

procedures for the flight crew and cabin

crew have not been revised to advise the

crew that this means is available to

remove power from the IFE system

when necessary. This condition, if not

corrected, could result in failure to

remove power from the IFE system

during a non-normal or emergency

situation, and consequent inability to

control smoke or fumes in the airplane

flight deck or cabin.

Explanation of Relevant Service

Information

The FAA has reviewed and approved

Hollingsead International Service

Bulletin 2526–2332–001, dated July 19,

2000, which describes procedures for

deactivation of the IFE system and

removal of the system from the airplane.

The procedures include removal of

circuit breakers, stowage of associated

wires, installation of plug buttons in

circuit breaker holes, and removal of

audio and video equipment.

Accomplishment of the actions

specified in the service bulletin is

intended to adequately address the

identified unsafe condition. In addition,

the operators of the affected airplanes

have informed the FAA that the IFE

systems installed in accordance with

STC SA8026NM are no longer in use,

and the operators are removing them.

Explanation of Requirements of

Proposed Rule

Since an unsafe condition has been

identified that is likely to exist or

develop on other products of this same

type design, the proposed AD would

require accomplishment of the actions

specified in the service bulletin

described previously, except as

discussed below.

Differences Between Proposed Rule and

Service Bulletin

Operators also should note that the

service bulletin specifies that the

actions therein should be accomplished

within 1 year after the date of issuance

of the service bulletin. In developing an

appropriate compliance time for this

action, the FAA considered not only the

degree of urgency associated with

addressing the subject unsafe condition,

but the amount of time necessary to

accomplish the proposed actions, the

availability of necessary parts, and the

practical aspect of accomplishing the

proposed actions within an interval of

time that parallels normal scheduled

maintenance for the affected operators.

In consideration of all of these factors,

the FAA has determined that 18 months

after the effective date of this AD

represents an appropriate interval of

time allowable wherein an acceptable

level of safety can be maintained.

Other Relevant Proposed Rulemaking

This proposed action is one of a

number of proposed AD’s on airplanes

modified by STC’s that have been

determined to be subject to similar

unsafe conditions. Other currently

proposed AD’s include the following

airplanes and STC’s:

Model/Series STC number Docket number

Boeing 757–200 ................................................................................................................................... SA1727GL 2000–NM–228–AD

McDonnell Douglas DC–10–30 ............................................................................................................ ST00054SE 2000–NM–231–AD

Boeing 767–300 and 767–300ER ........................................................................................................ SA5765NM

SA5978NM

2000–NM–232–AD

Boeing 767–300 ................................................................................................................................... ST00157SE 2000–NM–233–AD

Boeing 747–100 and –200 ................................................................................................................... ST00196SE 2000–NM–234–AD

Boeing 767–200 ................................................................................................................................... SA5134NM 2000–NM–235–AD

Boeing 767–300 ................................................................................................................................... ST00118SE 2000–NM–236–AD

Boeing 737–300 ................................................................................................................................... ST00171SE 2000–NM–237–AD

Boeing 767–200 ................................................................................................................................... SA4998NM 2000–NM–238–AD

Boeing 767–300 ................................................................................................................................... SA7019NM–D 2000–NM–239–AD

Boeing 747–100 and –200 ................................................................................................................... SA8622SW 2000–NM–240–AD

McDonnell Douglas DC–10–30 ............................................................................................................ SA8452SW 2000–NM–241–AD

Boeing 737–700 ................................................................................................................................... ST09100AC–D

ST09104AC–D

ST09105AC–D

ST09106AC–D

2000–NM–242–AD

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2001 / Proposed Rules 13189

Model/Series STC number Docket number

Boeing 767–200 ................................................................................................................................... ST09022AC–D 2000–NM–243–AD

Boeing 747SP ...................................................................................................................................... ST09097AC–D 2000–NM–244–AD

Boeing 747–400 ................................................................................................................................... SA8843SW 2000–NM–245–AD

Airbus A340–211 .................................................................................................................................. ST0902AC–D 2000–NM–246–AD

Cost Impact

There are approximately 6 airplanes

of the affected design in the worldwide

fleet. The FAA estimates that 3

airplanes of U.S. registry would be

affected by this proposed AD, that it

would take approximately 4 work hours

per airplane to accomplish the proposed

actions, and that the average labor rate

is $60 per work hour. Based on these

figures, the cost impact of the proposed

AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be

$720, or $240 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed

above is based on assumptions that no

operator has yet accomplished any of

the proposed requirements of this AD

action, and that no operator would

accomplish those actions in the future if

this proposed AD were not adopted. The

cost impact figures discussed in AD

rulemaking actions represent only the

time necessary to perform the specific

actions actually required by the AD.

These figures typically do not include

incidental costs, such as the time

required to gain access and close up,

planning time, or time necessitated by

other administrative actions.

Regulatory Impact

The regulations proposed herein

would not have a substantial direct

effect on the States, on the relationship

between the national Government and

the States, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities among the

various levels of government. Therefore,

it is determined that this proposal

would not have federalism implications

under Executive Order 13132.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this proposed regulation (1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if

promulgated, will not have a significant

economic impact, positive or negative,

on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft

regulatory evaluation prepared for this

action is contained in the Rules Docket.

A copy of it may be obtained by

contacting the Rules Docket at the

location provided under the caption

ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration proposes to amend part

39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 19 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding the following new airworthiness

directive:

McDonnell Douglas: Docket 2000–NM–229–

AD.

Applicability: Model DC–9–51 and DC–9–

83 series airplanes modified by

Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)

SA8026NM, certificated in any category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in

the area subject to the requirements of this

AD. For airplanes that have been modified,

altered, or repaired so that the performance

of the requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent the inability of the flight crew

to remove power from the in-flight

entertainment (IFE) system when necessary;

which, during a non-normal or emergency

situation, could result in inability to control

smoke or fumes in the airplane flight deck or

cabin; accomplish the following:

Deactivation and Removal

(a) Within 18 months after the effective

date of this AD, deactivate the IFE system

and remove the system from the airplane, in

accordance with Hollingsead International

Service Bulletin 2526–2332–001, dated July

19, 2000.

Spares

(b) As of the effective date of this AD, no

person shall install an IFE system in

accordance with STC SA8026NM on any

airplane.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

(c) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Los

Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),

FAA. Operators shall submit their requests

through an appropriate FAA Principal

Maintenance Inspector, who may add

comments and then send it to the Manager,

Los Angeles ACO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.

Special Flight Permits

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197

and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a

location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February

23, 2001.

Donald L. Riggin,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 01–4941 Filed 3–1–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2000–NM–231–AD]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell

Douglas Model DC–10–30 Series

Airplanes Modified by Supplemental

Type Certificate ST00054SE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking

(NPRM).