alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1
 
 Certification
 
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Amit
Tandon, certify that:
 
 1.      I
have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Emissary Capital Group,
Inc. f/k/a Cavalier Holdings, Inc. (“Emissary”);
 
 2.      Based
on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by the annual report;
 
 3.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
 Emissary as of, and for, the periods presented in the annual
report;
 
 4.      I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
Emissary and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to Emissary, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is
being  prepared;  b)  evaluated  the
effectiveness  of Emissary disclosure  controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days  prior to the
filing  date of
this  quarterly  report  (the "Evaluation Date");
and c) presented in the annual report our conclusions about
the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.      Emissary’s
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on my most recent
evaluation,  to Emissary’s auditors and the audit committee of
Emissary’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could  adversely  affect Emissary’s ability to
record,  process, summarize and report  financial data and
have  identified for Emissary’s auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or
not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who
have a significant role in Emissary’s internal controls; and
 
 6.      
I have indicated in the annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.
 
 Date:
September 22, 2009
 
 /s/AmitTandon
 Amit
Tandon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7657

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TAMMIE DESCHELL DIGGS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-48-P, CA-96-55-3-P)

Submitted: July 22, 1997 Decided: September 3, 1997

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tammie Deschell Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions in which the United

States is a party have sixty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are

when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on May 3, 1996; Appellant

gave her notice of appeal and motion to extend the appeal period to

prison officials on October 11, 1996, which is beyond the sixty-day

appeal period. Although the district court granted Appellant's

motion to file a late appeal, we find that the district court did

not have authority to do so because the motion was filed more than

thirty days after the expiration of the appeal period. See Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(5). Moreover, as Appellant failed to explain in her

motion why she did not timely appeal the May 3 order, we find that

there was no basis for reopening the appeal period under Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(6).

Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or properly obtain

an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without juris-
3

diction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore

deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Krooss, Appellant, *v.*Murray, Judge, Appellee.

[Cite as *Krooss v. Murray,*123 Ohio St.3d 85, 2009-Ohio-4051.]

(No. 2009-0449

Submitted August 11, 2009

Decided August 18, 2009.)

Herbert Creech, for appellant.

Ronald C. Lewis, Xenia Law Director, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Paul Krooss, for a writ of prohibition to prevent appellee, Xenia Municipal Court Judge Michael Murray, from proceeding in a case involving Krooss. Contrary to appellant’s assertions, Judge Murray does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction over the underlying case, because the case has a territorial connection to the municipal court. See *Cheap Escape Co., Inc. v. Haddox, L.L.C.,*120 Ohio St.3d 493, 2008-Ohio-6323, 900 N.E.2d 601, syllabus. Absent a patent and unambiguous lack of jurisdiction, Krooss has an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his jurisdictional claim. *State ex rel. Plant v. Cosgrove,*119 Ohio St.3d 264, 2008-Ohio-3838, 893 N.E.2d 485, ¶ 5.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 10.6.9**

 

**Quaker City Bank Three Year Employment Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Frederic R. McGill dated July 1, 2003.**

 

**QUAKER CITY BANK**

**THREE YEAR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**RENEWAL AND EXTENSIONACKNOWLEDGMENT**

 

Name of Executive:    Frederic R. (Rick) McGill 

 

The undersigned executive does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly scheduled meeting on June 19, 2003, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank acted torenew and extend the Quaker City Bank Three Year Employment Agreement with the undersigned executive to a full thirty-six (36) month term, until June 30, 2006. 

 

Dated this             1st            day of             July            , A.D.,            2003            .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                             697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7289
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8986
<PP&E>                                           11316                                       
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5650
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          6
<OTHER-SE>                                       11018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23693
<SALES>                                             37
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1149
<CGS>                                              130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    510
<INCOME-TAX>                                        84
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04                                      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Willie REYNOLDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7362.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2011.

Willie Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Office of the United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Reynolds appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *See United States v. Reynolds,*No. 6:90-cr-00054-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 21.1  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  Name
  
  State
  or other Jurisdiction of IncorporationGT Equipment
  Holdings, Inc.
  
  New Hampshire (inactive)GT Solar China Co.,
  Ltd.
  
  Peoples Republic of
  ChinaGT Solar Hong Kong,
  Limited
  
  Hong KongGT Solar Incorporated
  
  DelawareGT Solar Mauritius,
  Ltd.
  
  Republic of MauritiusGT Solar Shanghai Co.,
  Ltd.
  
  Peoples Republic of
  ChinaGT Solar Taiwan Co.
  LTD.
  
  Republic of China
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13072-13073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Technological Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App. 2, Public Law 92-463, as amended, this notice advises 
interested persons of the first meeting of the Technological Advisory 
Council (``Council'') to be held under its new charter, renewed 
December 11, 2000. The meeting will be held at the Federal 
Communications Commission in Washington, DC.

DATES: Wednesday, March 28, 2001, at 10:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. SW., Room 
TW-C305, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kent Nilsson at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dbb0b5b2b7a8a8b4b59bbdb8b8f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="58333631342b2b3736183e3b3b763f372e">[email protected]</span></a> or 
202-418-0845.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council was established by the Federal 
Communications Commission to provide a vehicle through which a diverse 
array of recognized experts in technologies that affect, or are 
affected by, telecommunications can provide timely advice to the FCC on 
trends in technological innovations that may affect the communications 
industry. The purpose of this meeting will be to determine the way to 
best achieve this goal. The Council may also consider such other issues 
as come before the Council at the meeting. Members of the general 
public may attend the meeting. The Federal Communications Commission 
will attempt to accommodate as many persons as possible. Admittance, 
however, will be

[[Page 13073]]

limited to the seating available. Depending on the Council's progress 
at this meeting, public participation may be permitted at the 
discretion of the Council's Chairman. Interested persons may submit 
written comments to Kent Nilsson before the meeting either by e-mail 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a21242326393925240a2c2929642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52393c3b3e21213d3c123431317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>) or by U.S. mail to Kent Nilsson, Special Counsel and 
Deputy Chief-Network Technology Division, Office of Engineering & 
Technology, U.S. Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20554.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5042 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99

PFIZER INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)



|(millions of dollars, except per share data)                       | One Month 2000 | Seven Months 2000
|------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------- | -----------------
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Revenues                                                           | $2,250         | $16,513          
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Costs and expenses:                                                |                |                  
|Cost of sales                                                      | 363            | 2,725            
|Selling, informational and administrative expenses                 | 811            | 6,481            
|Research and development expenses                                  | 318            | 2,464            
|Merger-related costs                                               | 218            | 2,487            
|Other income-net                                                   | (10)           | (271)            
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Income before provision for taxes on income and minority interests | 550            | 2,627            
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Provision for taxes on income                                      | 151            | 1,278            
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Minority interests                                                 | 1              | 6                
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Net income                                                         | $  398 
====== | $ 1,343 
======= 
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Basic earnings per common share                                    | $  .07 
====== | $   .22 
======= 
|                                                                   |                |                  
|Diluted earnings per common share                                  | $  .06 
====== | $   .21 
=======
Glossary 

Antigen

A substance, usually a protein, on the surface of a cell or bacterium that 

stimulates the production of an antibody. 

Antibody 

A protein produced by B cells in the body in response to the presence of an 

antigen, e.g. a bacterium or virus. Antibodies are a primary form of immune 

response in resistance to disease and act by attaching themselves to a 

foreign antigen and weakening or destroying it. 

Ataxia 

The inability to coordinate the movements of muscles. 

Acute 

Severe and of short duration. 

Conjunctival Sac 

A delicate mucous membrane that covers the internal part of the eyelid and 

is attached to the cornea. 

Clinical Signs 

Based on or involving medical treatment, practice, observation, or diagnosis. 

Cyanotic 

A condition in which the skin and mucous membranes take on a bluish color. 

Etiology 

The science of dealing with the causes of disease. 

Enteric 

Relating to or situated in the intestine. 

Edematous 

A buildup of excess serous fluid between tissue cells. 

Ecchymotic 

Small hemorraghic spot, larger than petechia. 

Exudate 
Fluid with a high content of protein, usually as a result of inflammation. 

Fulminating 

To occur suddenly with great intensity. 

Gallinaceous 

Birds of the order, Gallinae, which includes domestic fowl, pheasants, grouse 

and quail. "Chicken-like" 

Nucleoprotein 

A substance composed of a simple basic protein combined with a nucleic 

acid. 

Neuraminidase 

An enzyme of the surface of a virus that destroys the neuraminic acid of the 

cell surface during attachment preventing hemagglutination. 

Nares 

Openings or passages leading out of the nose or nasal cavity. 

Necrosis 

The death of cells in a tissue or organ caused by disease or injury. 

Pathogenic 

Causing disease, or able to cause disease. 

Petechial 

Minute red spot due to the escape of a small amount of blood. 

Periorbital 

Around the eye socket. 

Peritoneum 

A smooth transparent membrane that lines the abdomen and doubles back 

over the surfaces of the internal organs to form a continuous sac. 

Peracute 

Very acute, having severe symptoms and a short course. 
Strain 

A subgroup of a species of organism distinguished by specific characteristics. 

Seroconversion 

To produce specific antibodies in response to the presence of an antigen such 

as a bacterium or virus. 

Torticollis 

A twisting of the neck to one side, resulting in the head being tilted. 

Virus 

Submicroscopic parasite particle of a nucleic acid surrounded by protein that 

can only replicate within a host cell. Viruses are not considered to be 

independent living organisms. 

Virulent 

Extremely poisonous, infectious, or damaging to organisms.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




The Board of Directors and Stockholders
ALLIED Life Financial Corporation


We  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-71906, 33-71960, 33-71962, 33-76874 and 33-83274 on Form S-8, and 33-92206 on
Form S-3 of ALLIED Life  Financial  Corporation of our reports dated February 7,
1997  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of ALLIED  Life  Financial
Corporation  and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated  statements  of earnings,  stockholders'  equity and cash flows and
related  schedules for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1996,  which  appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of
ALLIED Life Financial Corporation.

                                                     /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
March 18, 1997

                                      104
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.9.6     Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and
                   Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Kathryn
                   M. Hennigan dated July 1, 2000.


                                QUAKER CITY BANK
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Participant:              Kathryn M. Hennigan
                    ----------------------------------------------------------



The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 15, 2000, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank
acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement with
the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June
30, 2002.


Dated this ___1st___ day of ____July____, A.D., ______2000_______.



                                        QUAKER CITY BANK


/s/ Kathryn M. Hennigan                 By:  /s/ Frederic R. McGill
---------------------------                --------------------------
Participant                             President
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




To The
Board of Directors


RINO
International Corporation and subsidiaries





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (No. 333-163436) of RINO International Corporation (the “Company”) of our
report dated March 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the
related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, 2009, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.





/S/
Frazer Frost, LLP





Brea,
California





September
13, 2010




135 South
State College Boulevard, Suite 300 | Brea, California 92821 | 714.990.1040 |
frazerfrost.com
 Los
Angeles and Visalia, CA | Little Rock and Fayetteville, AR | Raleigh,
NC
 FRAZER FROST, LLP is an
independent firm associated with Moore Stephens International
Limited.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32.02

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 14, 2006

                                        By: /s/ James McDade
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            James McDade
                                            Chief Financial Officer

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).