alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER01-747-000 and ER01-747-001]


Attala Generating Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

February 28, 2001.
    Attala Generating Company, L.L.C. (Attala) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which Attala will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions at market-based rates. In its 
application, Attala also requested waiver of various Commission 
regulations. In particular, Attala requested that the Commission grant 
blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liability by Attala.
    On February 15, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, 
Tariffs and Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Attala should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Attala is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Attala's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 19, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-5338 Filed 3-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5468]



[[Page 13793]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development 
(#1199).
    Date/Time: March 14-15, 2001 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Stafford Place II--
Conference Center, 4121 Wilson Boulevard, Room 565, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. A. James Hicks, Program Director, Human 
Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Telephone: 
(703) 292-4668.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Louis Stokes Alliances for 
Minority Participation proposals as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 1, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management.
[FR Doc. 01-5468 Filed 3-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the undersigned officer of Chase Packaging Corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| November 16, 2009 |   | /s/ Ann C. W. Green                             |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Ann C. W. Green                                 |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary |
|                   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    |

 

----
Exhibit 10.3


 





 


AMENDMENT #1 TO THE SENIOR SECURED



PROMISSORY NOTE ORIGINALLY ISSUED
ON FEBRUARY 5, 2020


 


THIS AMENDMENT #1 to
the Note (as defined below) (the "Amendment") is entered into effective July 15, 2020 (the "Effective Date"),
by and between Predictive Oncology, Inc. (a/k/a Precision Therapeutics, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and Oasis Capital, LLC, a Puerto Rico limited liability company (the "Holder", and together with the Company, the "Parties").


 


BACKGROUND


 


A.              
The Company issued that certain senior secured promissory note (the "Note") to the Holder on February 5, 2020.


 


B.               
The Company and Holder desire to amend the Note as set forth expressly below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration
of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


Upon the execution
of this Amendment (as defined below) by the Company, (i) the "Maturity Date" for all amounts of principal, interest and
other amounts owed and outstanding under the Note as of the Effective Date shall be extended from August 5, 2020 to September 30,
2020, and in exchange for such extension (ii) the outstanding principal amount of the Note is hereby increased by One Hundred Seventy-Two
Thousand Five Hundred ($172,500.00) such that as of the Effective Date, the outstanding principal amount (not including accrued
interest and any other amounts) owed under the Note is $1,622,500.00.


 


This Amendment shall
be deemed part of but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the Note. Except as
specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Note, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment, shall
remain in full force and effect, and this Amendment shall be governed by the same law, and have the same conflict resolution provisions,
as set forth in the Note. The parties hereby ratify and confirm the terms and conditions of the Note, as supplemented and amended
by this Amendment.






    	 	1	 



     


    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


 


 


 


 


	PREDICTIVE ONCOLOGY INC.	 
	 	 
	Name:	 	/s/ Bob Myers	 
	Title:	 	CFO	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	OASIS CAPITAL, LLC	 
	 	 
	Name:	 	/s/ Adam R. Long	 
	Title:	 	Managing Member	 






 


 


 


 


 


 


2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RO G ER Q U I N TA N I LLA - TO RRES, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 71008 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 754- 046 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary9, 2013 ** B efo re: H U G , F A R R IS , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P et i t i on erR og erQ ui nt ani l l a- T orre s, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f E l S al vado r, p e titio n s p r o s e f

o rr e v ie w o f

ad e c is io n f

r o m th e B o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls (“ B IA ”) . T he B IA di sm i ss ed hi s app ea l fr om the i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) deni al o f h is m o tio n to r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s a f te rh is r e m o v a l w a s o r d e r e din ab s e n tia .



# FI LED MA R 14 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSB e c au s e th e p a rt i e s a r e f a m i l i a rwi th th e f

a c t s u n d e r l y i n g th i s ap p e a l , we 1 do no tre coun tthe fa ct s her e. 2 Wh e r e th e B I A a d o p t s th e I J ' s d e c i s i o n a n da d d s i t s o wn r e a s o n i n g , we r e v ie w b o th d e c is io n s . L op ez -Cardo na v. H older , 66 2 F . 3d 11 10 , 11 11 (9th C i r. 2011) . T he de ni a l of

am ot i on t o r e ope n i s r e vi e w e d f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on, a nd q u e s tio n s o f

law a r e r e v ie w e dd e n o v o . H am azaspyan v. H

older , 590 F . 3d 744, 747 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . O urr e vi e w of a n i n abs e nt i ar e m ova l or de ri s l i m i t e d t o the va l i di tyof

the not i c e pr ovi de d t o the a l i e n, the r e a s ons f orthe a l i e n’ s abs e nc e , a nd w he the rthe a l i e n i s r e m ovabl e . 8 U . S . C . § 1229a ( b) ( 5) ( D ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 1 Q ui nt a ni l l a - T orr e s f

a i l e d t o c ha l l e nge the B I A a nd I J ’ s gr ounds f orde ny i ng h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e d e e m th o s e is s u e s w a iv e d . See R i zk v. H older , 629 F . 3d 1 0 8 3 , 1 0 9 1 n .3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) . Q u in tan illa - T o rr e s ’s s o le a r g u m e n t o n ap p e a l is tha the s houl d be pe rm i tt e d t o r e ope n hi s c a s e s o tha the c a n pur s ue c a nc e l l a t i on of re m ov aland adj ustm entof st atus. H ow ever , R og erfa i l ed t o rai se thi s i ss ue before e i the rthe B I A orthe I J . B e c aus e he di d note xhaus tthi s c l a i m , w e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on to c o n s id e rit. Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 3 5 8 F .3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 7 - 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . P E T I T I ON DE NI E D.
#### Brenda ABERCROMBIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-5802.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 20, 2007.

Before: COOK and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; and EDGAR, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Robert Allan Edgar, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Abercrombie appeals the district court’s dismissal of her suit against the United States Department of Agriculture for lack subject matter of jurisdiction. Having reviewed the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.
#### Frank LIE; Trace Gunawan, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71527.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 19, 2011.

Kari Elisabeth Hong, Law Offices of Kari E. Hong, Redlands, CA, for Petitioners.

Glen T. Jaeger, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Frank Lie and Trace Gunawan, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying as untimely petitioners’ motion to reopen because the motion was filed over three years after the BIA’s order dismissing the underlying appeal. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2); *see also Dela Cruz v. Mukasey,*532 F.3d 946, 949 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (“[T]he pendency of a petition for review of an order of removal does not toll the statutory time limit for the filing of a motion to reopen with the BIA.”). Additionally, petitioners failed to present sufficient evidence of changed circumstances in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); *see also He v. Gonzales,*501 F.3d 1128, 1131-32 (9th Cir.2007) (change in personal circumstances does not establish changed circumstances in the country of origin excusing untimely motion to reopen).

We reject petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed to consider the evidence because they have not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record. *See Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6741

DWIGHT SULLIVAN, a/k/a Dwight F. Sullivan, a/k/a Dwight 

Fitzgerald Sullivan,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden of McCormick & Perry Correctional 

Institutions,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(8:13-cv-00876-TMC)

Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: October 3, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dwight Fitzgerald Sullivan seeks to appeal the 

district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition, and denying his motion to reconsider. The 

orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Sullivan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL 12, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2010

|                                                                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                          
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                                    
|Paritosh K. Choksi Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SCHEDULES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,365
<SECURITIES>                                     1,117
<RECEIVABLES>                                  158,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,213
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,003
<PP&E>                                         263,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 638,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          263,776
<BONDS>                                         50,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                     336,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   638,674
<SALES>                                        228,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,209
<CGS>                                          192,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,295)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,552)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>