alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |  |
| /s/ Barton R. Brookman                |   | February 22, 2016 |
| Barton R. Brookman                    |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
| /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                  |   | February 22, 2016 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                      |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer               |   |   |
2009-0104.

#### Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90619, 179 Ohio App.3d 385, 2008-Ohio-5991. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Philip R. Matthews and William J. Baron by Donald A. Lane. Motion granted.
Exhibit 99.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LabOne, Inc.

 

LabOne, Inc.

Date:  May 14, 2003
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


The Board of Directors
Noeth Bancshares, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-82356) on Form S-8 of North Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated
February 13, 1998, relating to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of North Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period anded
December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report
on Form 10-KSB of North Bancshares, Inc.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick

Chicago, Illinois
March 31, 1998
COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

 CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

 JUSTICES

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER 

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

KEITH E. HOTTLE 

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335-2762

November 25, 2015

Nicolas A. LaHood

District Attorney, Bexar County

101 W. Nueva, Suite 370

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Michael D. Robbins

Bexar County Public Defender's 

Office

101 W. Nueva, Ste. 370

San Antonio, TX 78205-3440

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-15-00245-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 2014CR0936

Style: Julio Alejandro Zuniga

v.

The State of Texas

Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has 

issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

______________________

Cecilia Barbosa

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 5-3221

cc: Michael Lee Young (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 25, 2015

No. 04-15-00245-CR

Julio Alejandro ZUNIGA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0936

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed with this court on October 25, 2015. We 

granted Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief until November 20, 

2015. On the due date, Appellant filed his second motion for extension of time to file his brief. 

He requested a thirty-day extension for a total extension of fifty-seven days. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief must be filed with this court by 

December 21, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
USDA Food S3fety 3nd Inspection Service 

= U.S.Offi\RT"81TOfAl3ACU.T\.RE 

• 

• 

ll1\forn·nwn1 

nv<·s1igmirn 

nnlysl.s 

ffin·r 

Insert Photo

If Desired

2

7/15/2022

Exit Conference EIAO Training

1

1

Performing the Assessment

• Prior to exit conference

• Discuss findings with SEIAO and DO to ensure all issues are resolved

• Meet with FLS, IIC, and IPP

• Hold Exit Conference within the 5-7 Day in-plant time frame.

2

Exit Conference

• EIAO schedules exit conference

• IIC, FLS, and plant management should attend the exit meeting

• Document meeting in the General tool

3

3

1
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• 

• 

• 

4

5

7/15/2022

Exit Conference

• EIAO will provide a “Draft” marked copy of the report to the

establishment

• If an Agency letter such as NOIE is issued, it should be presented and

discussed

• Any NRs documenting noncompliances not in support of a NOIE should

be presented and discussed

4

Exit Conference

• Thank the establishmentfortheir cooperation

• Describe FSA findings including any recommendations made to the

DO

• Describe the basis for all NRs and any enforcement

recommendations made to the DO. Enforcement action documents

are to be given at the exit conference

5

Exit Conference

• Advise that a final copy will be provided through the DCS

• Answer questions

• Provide business card for contact info

6

6

2
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ -·~ 

• -·---- - ~~ 

• 

-

• 

7/15/2022

Exit Conference

• For small /very small establishments, direct them to resources to

meet SBREFA obligations

7

7

Questions?

8

8

Objective Checkup

• What are the key components to performing an FSA?

• What is “analysis”?

• What forms are completed by the EIAO during the FSA?

• What is the purpose of the executive summary?

• List and describe the possible FSA outcomes.

• What is the distribution of the FSA Report and timeframe for

completion

9

9

3
[No. 24955-7-III.

Division Three.

August 7, 2007.]

#### Angela D. Baird et al., *Appellants,*v. Peter Elliot et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 03-2-05318-4, Jerome J. Leveque, J., entered January 20, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Stephens, J.
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00831-CR

WESLEY BERNARD GORDON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 183rd District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1363672).

TO THE 183RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 19th day of March 2015, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on September 19, 2013. After submitting 

the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s 

judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the 

Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered March 19, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown. Opinion 

delivered by Justice Higley.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

May 29, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7518** 

ODELL EWING , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
JEFFREY CUTLER , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 5:11

- ct

- 03129

- F )

Submitted : May 24 , 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012

Before MOTZ and DAVIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Odell Ewing, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Odell Ewing appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 4 2 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ewing v. Cutler , No.
5:11

- ct

- 03129

- F (E.D.N.C. Oc t. 28, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 1 APHIS Approved Rapid Defrost Facilities 10/04/2023

APHIS Approved Rapid Defrost Facilities

State Establishment Name City Address Phone

Number

FSIS Phone

Number

FSIS Fax

Number

California I6 - Lineage Logistics PFS, LLC Vernon 4901 Bandini Blvd. (323) 263-8811 323-263-8811

California I7 - Americold Logistics Compton 19840 Rancho Way (310) 632-6265 310-632-6265

California I16 - Americold Logistics Carson 1610 Sepulveda Boulevard (310) 632-6265 310-632-6265

California I19 - Lineage Logistics PFS, LLC San Leandro 400 Polar Way (510) 352-3900 510-352-3900

California I54 - Weighmasters Murphy, Inc. Long Beach 1601 West 12th Street (562) 495-4144 562-435-7819

California I114 - Konoike Pacific California, Inc. Wilmington 1420 Coil Avenue (310) 518-1000 310-518-1000

California I517 - Lineage Logistics PFS, LLC Wilmington 900 East M Street (310) 518-1800 310-518-1800

Florida I258 - Seaonus Cold Storage Jacksonville 2625 West 5th Street (904) 486-6059 904-469-4034

Florida I277 - Jacob Fleishman Cold Storage, Inc. Miami 1177 NW 81st Street (305) 696-2350 305-696-2351

Florida I303 - Northwestern Meat, Inc. Miami 2100 N.W. 23 Street (305) 633-8112 305-633-8112

Florida I528 - United States Cold Storage Inc. Medley 11801 NW 102 Road (305) 691-5391 305-691-5391

Maryland I158 - Merchants Terminal Corporation Jessup 7950 Oceano Avenue (410) 342-9300

New Jersey I182 - Americold Logistics LLC Mullica Hill 540 Franklinville Rd. (856) 285-2663 856-285-2726

New Jersey I191 - Camden Port Services, Inc. Woodstown 430 N. Main Street (856) 769-4141 856-769-2024

New Jersey I669 - Americold Logistics LLC Pedricktown 3 Gateway Boulevard (856) 285-2600 856-285-2659

South Carolina I5 - Americold Logistics LLC Summerville 1125 Newton Way (843) 486-1126 843-486-1578

Texas I15 - NOCS West Gulf La Porte 9223 Texas Hwy 225 (281) 930-8002 281-884-5412

Texas I20 - Versacold Texas, LP La Porte 502 North Broadway (281) 867-2613 281-867-2605

Texas I37 - Lineage Logistics PFS, LLC La Porte 10060 Porter Road 281-867-4500

Texas I393 - Maersk Warehousing & Dist Srvcs USA LLC Baytown 6455 Edna Way (979) 837-6452
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Larry Steve HAYS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-10977

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 19, 2014.

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Lowell King, Hamilton & Associates, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Larry Steve Hays has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hays has filed a response and a request for the appointment of counsel. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hays’s claims of ineffective assistance of *327counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hays’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Hays’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                            1206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      652
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       5225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12647
<PP&E>                                           12780                                       
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   45203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14544
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            15
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                7
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       21425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     45203
<SALES>                                            411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2489
<CGS>                                              186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (60)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (83)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    280
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01                                      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
#### In re: MUSICLAND HOLDING CORP., et al., Musicland Holding Corp., et al., Debtor, Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc., a California corporation, Cargill Financial Services International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Hain Capital Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, UBS Willow Fund, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Varde Investment Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Appellants, v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., a national banking association, in its capacity as Agent, Harris, N.A., a national banking association, Appellees.

No. 08-3146-bk.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 31, 2009.

Alan Kornfeld, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP, New York, NY, for Appellants.

Richard G. Haddad, (Stuart J. Wells, on the brief) Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, P.C., New York, NY, for Wacho-via.

Fred Lochbiller, Chapman and Cutler, Chicago, IL (Robert D. Piliero, Richard B. Brosnick, Butzel Long, New York, NY, on the brief), for Harris.

PRESENT: Hon. JOSEPH M. McLaughlin, Hon. Robert d. SACK, Circuit Judges, Hon. LEWIS A. KAPLAN,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellants, certain trade creditors of debtor Musicland Holding Corporation, appeal from a May 22, 2008, opinion and order of the United States District Court *37for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge), *Buena Vista Home Entm’t, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In re Musicland Holding Corp.),*386 B.R. 428 (S.D.N.Y.2008), affirming an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Stuart M. Bernstein, *Chief Bankruptcy Judge), Buena Vista Home Entm’t, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In re Musicland Holding Corp.),*374 B.R. 113 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2007), dismissing appellants’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We assume the parties’ and their counsel’s familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of this case, the opinions of the bankruptcy court and district court, and the issues raised on this appeal.

For substantially the reasons set forth in the opinion of the district court, affirming the order and judgment of the bankruptcy court, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated  Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         466
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                   744
<INVENTORY>                                    58,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               82,145
<PP&E>                                         63,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                 36,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,779
<BONDS>                                        84,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          9
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11
<OTHER-SE>                                     (96,990)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,083
<SALES>                                        122,397
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,397
<CGS>                                          46,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               85,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,572)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,572)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,572)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (4.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (4.38)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       4,038,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,204,316
<PP&E>                                      20,846,160
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,051,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,296,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,338,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,957,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,296,541
<SALES>                                      4,239,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,503,440
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,550,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,952,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,952,702
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,952,702
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.60
        

</TABLE>
2009-1288.

#### [State ex rel.] Looper v. Ohio State Univ.

In Mandamus.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.