alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Monthly CCC Honey Survey Price for Marketing Assistance Loans

 MONTH PRICE PER POUND

 (30-Day Repayment Rate)

 January 2023 $2.22

 December 2022 $2.27

 November 2022 $2.30

 October 2022 $2.27

 September 2022 $2.22

 August 2022 $2.32

 July 2022 $2.31

 June 2022 $2.27

 May 2022 $2.16

 April 2022 $2.17

 March 2022 $2.06

 February 2022 $1.89

 January 2022 $1.90

 

The loan repayment rate for nonrecourse marketing assistance loans is the lower of

principal plus interest or the 30-day repayment rate. If the 30-day repayment rate 

is higher than the principal plus interest, there is no loan deficiency payment (LDP) 

or marketing loan gain for that month. The nonrecourse marketing assistance loan

program applies to 2019-2023 crop honey and provides a national average loan rate 

of 69 cents per pound. 

2022 Crop Year (April 1, 2022 – March 31, 2023)

Commodity Loan Rate 30-Day Repayment Rate LDP

Honey $0.69 $2.22 $0.00

The following 2022-crop premiums and discounts will only apply if the loan is

settled through delivery of the loan collateral to CCC:

Color & Class Premium/Discount for 2022 crop

(cents/pound)

White 7.9

Extra Light Amber 0.6

Light Amber -4.3

Amber & Nontable -8.5

The following 2021 crop premiums and discounts will only apply if the loan is

settled through delivery of the loan collateral to CCC:

Color & Class Premium/Discount for 2021 crop

(cents/pound)

White 14.7

Extra Light Amber 1.1

Light Amber -8.7

Amber & Nontable -26.5

Further program information is available from Francina F. Hentz, (202) 720-7794,

francina.hentz@wdc.usda.gov.
??:Zi"'S 

I United StatH Depertment or Agrlculture 

Republic of Korea - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Poultry to the United States 

September 15, 2023 

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*) 

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted 

GJA14001 Harim Corporation 05/27/2014 

GIA15001 Maniker F&G Co., Ltd. 03/23/2015 

GJA17002 Charmfre Co., Ltd. 05/29/2017 

K01404001 Harim Corporation 05/27/2014 

K01413007 Charmfre Co., Ltd. 01/24/2017 

M01318001 Maniker Co., Ltd. 03/20/2019 

SRA200001 Jungdawn Jayeonilga #A Co., Ltd. 08/26/2020 

Underlined/Bolded establishments are eligible to produce raw poultry as source material for further processing
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00547-CR

Reynaldo Julius Perez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-02-30533-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 1, 2019
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 16, 2004

                                   By: /s/ Barry Mindes
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Barry Mindes
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 22 59

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ran da ll Tho m as McArt y
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
St at e o f Ark an sa s; Arka ns as Depa rtment o f Co rrec ti on

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t s
W il li am Str au gh n, M r., W ard en , ADC, Tuck er Ma x; Ste ve Out la w, Mr., Ass is ta nt W ard en , ADC, Tuck er Ma x; W il li am s, M r., Bu il di ng Majo r, ADC, Tuck er Ma x; Cal laway , Serg ean t o f Bu il di ng , ADC, Tuck er Ma x; Adk in s, Se rg ean t o f Bu il di ng , ADC, Tuck er Ma x
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es Kati naOwens , Cor

po ral , ADC, Tuck er Ma x; D. Coo k, Fi el d M ajor , ADC, Tuck er Max ; J en ki ns , Mrs ., Clas si fic at io n Off ic er, ADC, Tuc ke r Max
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t s

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Eas te rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - P in e Bl uf f

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Nov em

be r 24 , 20 15 Fi le d: Decem

be r 4, 2 01 5 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __Befo re LOKEN, BOWMAN, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t Jud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ark an sa s in m at e Ran da ll McArt y ap pe al s th e di stric t co urt’s adve rs e gr an t of 1

su m m ary jud gm en t in hi s 42 U.S

. C

. § 19 83 act io n in whi ch he cl ai m ed th at de fen da nt s fai le d to pr ot ect hi m fro m an at ta ck by an ot he r in m at e. Upo n caref ul de
no vo rev ie w, se e Pai ne v. Je ffer so n Nat. Life In s. Co ., 59 4 F.3 d 98 9, 99 1- 92 (2 01 0) , we co nc lu de , fo r th e reas on s expl ai ne d by th e di st ric t co urt, th at de fen dant s were no t de li be rat el y in di ffer en t to a se rio us ris k to McArt y ’s sa fety , se e Tuc ke r v. Eva ns , 27 6 F.3 d 99 9, 10 01 (8 th Ci r
. 2 0 02 ). Acco rd in gl y , th e jud gm en t of th e di st ric t co urt is affi rm ed . See 8 thCir . R. 47 B. 2

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le J. Leo n Hol m es , Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t J ud ge for th e Eas te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e rep ort an d reco m m en da ti on s o f t h e Hon or ab le Je ro m e T. Kearn ey , Uni te d St at es Mag i s t rat e Ju dg e fo r th e East ern Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s. W e do no t co ns id er th e di sm is sa l of cert ai n cl ai m s an d de fen dant s fo r fai lu re 2 to st at e a cl ai m an d fai lu re to e x h au s t admin is tra ti ve rem ed ie s be cau se McArt y di d no t rai se th es e is su es in hi s br ie f. See Ja sp ers on v. Pu ro la to r Co ur ie r Co rp ., 76 5 F.2 d 73 6, 7 40 -4 1 (8 th Cir . 19 85 ).

-2

-
2023 年县级委员会

选举

2023年6月15日

提名期开始。

表格可在fsa.usda.

gov/elections获得。

2023年8月1日

在当地县级农业服务

局办公室提交提名表

的最后一天。

2023年11月6日

选票邮寄给合的选

民。

2023年12月4日

将已填写选票交至当

地县级农业服务局办

公室的最后一天。

2024年1月1日

新当选的县级委员

上任。

您的农业社区和美国农业部

连结

2023年6月 美国农业部在就业和贷款方面提供平等的机会

农业服务局

美国农业部
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Credit Management Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Paul D. Colasono, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







U /s/
      Paul
      D. Colasono U


Paul
        D.
        Colasono
 Chief
        Financial Officer


August
      14, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mitchell Rubenstein, as Chief Executive Officer of Hollywood Media Corp. (the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form
10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date:   March 30, 2004                    By:     /s/ Mitchell Rubenstein
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  Mitchell Rubenstein,
                                                  Chairman of the Board
                                                  and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2532 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 491

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2532

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse in 
 Lubbock, Texas, as the ``George H. Mahon Federal Building and United 
                          States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                June 23 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 491
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2532

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                June 23 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse in 
 Lubbock, Texas, as the ``George H. Mahon Federal Building and United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 1205 
Texas Avenue in Lubbock, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``George H. Mahon Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``George H. Mahon Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.2

                         ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            BOMBARDIER CAPITAL INC.

          ----------------------------------------------------------

              BOMBARDIER RECEIVABLES MASTER TRUST I (the "Trust")
          ----------------------------------------------------------

     The undersigned, duly authorized representatives of Bombardier Capital
Inc. ("BCI"), as Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of January 1, 1994 (as amended and supplemented, the "Agreement"), by
and among Bombardier Credit Receivables Corporation ("BCRC"), as Depositor,
BCI, as Servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as
Bankers Trust Company), as Trustee, do hereby certify, on behalf of BCI, that:

1. BCI is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned are Servicing Officers and are duly authorized pursuant to
the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee and any
Enhancement Providers and all other persons specified in Section 3.05 of the
Agreement.

3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2003, and of its performance under the Agreement, was conducted
under our supervision.

4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of our knowledge,
performed in all material respects all of its obligations under the Agreement
throughout such year and no material default in the performance of such
obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5
below.

5. The following is a description of each material default in the performance
of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to
us to have been made by the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2003,
which sets forth in detail the (a) nature of each such default, (b) the action
taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default, and (c) the
current status of each such default: none.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in the
Agreement.


<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 30th day of April, 2004.

                            BOMBARDIER CAPITAL INC.

                          By: /s/ Lawrence F. Assell
                              Lawrence F. Assell
                      Vice President and General Manager,
                           Inventory Finance - U.S.

                            By: /s/ George N. Demas
                                George N. Demas
              Vice President, Legal Services, Clerk and Secretary


                                      2
Exhibit 10.21
                               AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
                          FIRST AVIATION SERVICES INC.
                              STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


         Amendment, dated June 10, 2003, to the First Aviation Services Inc.
Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined
herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS,   First  Aviation  Services  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"),  created and adopted the Plan effective December 20, 1996, which was
approved by the stockholders of the Corporation; and

     WHEREAS, the Company, through its Board of Directors, deems it desirable to
amend the Plan as set forth herein.

     NOW THEREFORE,  as approved by the stockholders of the Company as set forth
in  Section 2 hereto,  the Plan is hereby  amended  to read in its  entirety  as
follows, effective as of June 10, 2003:

         1. Amendment to Section 1.4(b). The first two sentences of Section
1.4(b) of the Plan are hereby amended to read in their entirety as follows:

                  "The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be
delivered pursuant to Awards (including Incentive Stock Options) granted to
Eligible Persons under this Plan shall not exceed 1,200,000 shares (the "Share
Limit"). The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered
pursuant to options qualified as Incentive Stock Options granted under this Plan
is 1,200,000 shares."

         2. Shareholder Approval. This Amendment was approved by the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of the Company's common stock
voting at its annual meeting of shareholders held on June 10, 2003.

         3. Effect on the Plan. All references in the Plan to "this Plan", the
"Plan", and all phrases of like import shall refer to the Plan as amended by
this Amendment. The terms "hereof", "herein", "hereby" and all phrases of like
import, used in the Plan shall refer to the Plan as amended by this Amendment.
Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

         4. No Further Amendment. Except as expressly provided herein, no other
term or provision of the Plan is amended hereby.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 of Enersis S.A (Registration No. 333-186823) of our report dated February 24, 2013 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement scheduleof Enersis S.A. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion for the year ended December 31, 2010 and refers to the audit of Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A. by other auditors), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Enersis S.A.for the year ended December 31, 2012, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement. 

/s/ Deloitte 

Deloitte Auditores y Consultores Limitada 

Santiago, Chile 

March 20, 2013
EX-10.18





 Exhibit 10.18 

AMENDMENT NO. 5 
 TO

 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2013 STOCK OPTION PLAN 

WHEREAS, the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Option Plan, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1-4 (as amended, the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company have determined it in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan pursuant to
Section 13 thereof to provide for an additional number of Shares (as defined in the Plan) currently available under the Plan. 
 NOW
THEREFORE, effective as of the date approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Plan. 


  

	 	2.	 Stock Subject to the Plan. The second sentence of Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended and
restated in its entirety to reflect the increase in available options to read as follows: 


 “Subject to the
provisions of Section 12 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon exercise of such Options is Eighty Five Thousand Five Hundred Forty Seven (85,547) Shares.” 

Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

This Amendment has been adopted by the Board of Directors and the Majority Shareholder as of August 16, 2016.
NO. 07-10-00141-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JULY 30, 2010

JAMES SCOT THOMAS, APPELLANT

v.

HECTOR ORTIZ, ET AL, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 278TH DISTRICT COURT OF WALKER COUNTY;

NO. 23,855; HONORABLE KENNETH H. KEELING, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.[footnoteRef:1] [1:  John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.] 

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

Appellant James Scot Thomas, appearing *pro se*, filed a notice of appeal from an order dismissing his civil suit for failure to comply with Chapter Fourteen of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.  Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 14.001-14.014 (Vernon 2002).  Notice of appeal was timely filed.  The reporter’s record and clerk’s record were filed and Thomas’s brief was due June 16, 2010.  Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed by that date.

By letter of June 28, 2010, we notified Thomas his brief was past due.  The letter further notified Thomas his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless his brief, accompanied by a motion for extension of time, was filed by July 8, 2010.  Thomas has not filed his brief or a motion for extension of time.

An appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution if an appellant fails to timely file a brief unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the failure. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).  On its own motion, with ten days notice to the parties, an appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).  

Thomas has not filed a brief or a motion for extension by the date specified, despite notice that failure to do so would subject the appeal to dismissal.  Accordingly, we dismiss Thomas’s appeal for want of prosecution.  *See* Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

James T. Campbell

Justice 

2
Exhibit 31.1

I, Trudy F. Sullivan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Talbots, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 29, 2012
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Trudy F. Sullivan                
|                   |  | Trudy F. Sullivan                    
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



-56-
Calculations Table for the Lactic Acid/Peroxyacetic Acid Wash Experiments 

FSIS C -28-2003 & C-29-2003 Revised August 24, 2005 

LACTIC ACID (88% food grade) PEROXYACETIC ACID (95% 

Concentration/ 

Container Size 

List 

price 

Cost per 

unit (oz) 

Cost per 

gallon 

of acid 

concentrat 

e 

Mixed 

Solution (cost 

per gallon) 

Concentration/ 

Container Size List price 

Cost per 

unit (mL) 

C

co

500 mL (Fisher) (16.907 oz) 

$108.27 $6.4039 $819.69 $32.7877 50 gal Inspexx 100 

(Ecolab list) 

$1,336.10 $0.00706 $26

50 gal. (Central Florida Chemical) (6400 oz) 

$800.00 $0.1250 $16.00 $0.6400 300 gal Inspexx 100 (Ecolab list) $8,334.90 $0.00734 $27

COST PER ANIMAL USING HAND-HELD SPRAYER WITH FAN NOZZLE (calculated using the price for solution made with 50 gal. size of acid concentrate) Lactic Acid (2%) 

Standard solution mix = 5.12 oz in 2 gal H2O (120°F) 

Peroxyacetic Acid (180-200 ppm) 

Standard solution mix = 8 mL in 2 gal 

1 gal = 250 quail cost per bird = $0.00256 1 gal = 250 quail cost per bird = $0.0001 gal = 10 hogs cost per hog carcass = $0.06400 1 gal = 10 hogs cost per hog carcass = $0.0021 gal = 5 beef cost per beef carcass = $0.12800 1 gal = 5 beef cost per beef carcass = $0.005

Conversion rates used: 128 oz = 1 gal; 3785.4 mL/gal. 50 gal = 189,270.589 mL; 50 gal = 6,400 oz Measure acid concentrate with 10 mL volumetric pipette. Strength of the wash solutions should be tested with a dissolved solids test mSources of Lactic Acid and/or Peroxyacetic Acid Loeffler Chemical Corp. http://www.loefflerchemical.com/commodity_chemicals.htm (LA & PAA) Chemical Register www.chemicalregister.com - lists supplier with link to get price quote (LA & PAA) Ecolab - Inspexx 100 www.ecolab.com - proprietary peroxyacetic acid formula IFT Food Buyer‘s Guide - http://buyersguide.ift.org Purac www.purac.com (LA)