alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Amendment  No. 1 to the  Annual  Report  of  Symbollon
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  (the  Company)  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the  year  ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the Report),  I, Jack H. Kessler,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: May 2, 2005             /s/ Jack H. Kessler
                              -----------------------------------
                              Jack H. Kessler
                              Chief Executive Officer
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2744

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel SWELL DANCER.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1993

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the

United States for the vessel SWELL DANCER.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the
2

•HR 2744 IH

1 United States for the vessel SWELL DANCER (official

2 number 622046).

Æ
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 STATEMENT
        REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China International
        Tourism
        Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
        as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Xiaojun
        Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
  *
        the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
        applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
        Xiaojun
        Wang
 Xiaojun
        Wang
  Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 
 Date:
        May
        14, 2008
 
 This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2


 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------


I, Robert G. Costantini, as Chief Financial Officer of First Aviation
Services Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

(1)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
     period ended July 31, 2004 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S. Securities
     and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 14, 2004


                                                     /s/ Robert G. Costantini
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Robert G. Costantini
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
     We have issued our report dated March 15, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements included inthe Annual Report of Mace Security International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2004. We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of MaceSecurity International, Inc.on Form S-3 (File No. 333-87981, filed September 28, 1999, amended December 27, 1999, File No.333-34096, filed April5, 2000, and File No. 333-34536, filed April 11, 2000, FileNo. 333-116527, filed June 16, 2004,amended September 24, 2004,and File No. 333-122074, filed January 14, 2005, amended February 3, 2005); Form S-4 (File No.333-89717, filed onOctober 26, 1999, amended December 21, 1999) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-31757, filed on July 22,1997 and File No.333-93311, filed on December 21, 1999).        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania   March 15, 2005
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

M IRON 2319, LLC
, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA
, Appellee.

No. 4D 2022

- 3074

[ February 28, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18

- 001510.

John M. Bernazzoli, Hollywood, and Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Kendra S. Breeden, City Attorney’s Office, Hollywood, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

The City of Hollywood administers water to utility customers like Miron 2139, LLC

. T he City notified Miron that it owed money for water delivered but not billed due to a defective water meter. Miron sought to enjoin the City from collecting payment and now appeals from summary judgment denying its request. We affirm with one exception.

T he 2014 amendment to section 5 1 .075(B) of the Hollywood Code of

Ordinances states:

In case the meter has been found to be defective or has ceased to register, the amount of usage to be billed for the period the meter was not functioning properly shall be determined by taking the average monthly usage for the previous 12 months. The City can then bill for past unbilled usage for a period up

to 60 months.

As we explained in Hollywood Park Apartments S outh , LLC v. City of Hollywood , 361 So. 3d 356, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023)

, “the previous 122 months necessarily refers to the period immediately preceding the unbilled usage period for which the city sought additional payment due to the meter

malfunction.”

In this case, the meter failed in June 2011 . For purposes of calculatin g the average monthly usage, t he previous twelve months is June 2010 to May 2011. Here, the circuit court did not calculate the monthly usage during that period. As such

, we reverse and remand to allow the circuit

court to determine Miron’s average month ly usage for the period from June 2010 to May 2011.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded

.

C ONNER

, K UNTZ and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jeremy Thomas ESTES, Appellant.

No. 10-2470.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 3, 2011.

Filed: Feb. 8, 2011.

Kyra. E. Jenner, Candace L. Taylor, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Smith, AR, for Appellee.

Jeremy Thomas Estes, Fayetteville, AR, pro se.

John B. Schisler, Assistant, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fayetteville, AR, for Appellant.

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Jeremy Thomas Estes guilty of six counts of receiving child pornography (Counts 1-6) and one count of possessing computer equipment containing child pornography (Count 7), 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), (a)(4)(B), (b). At sentencing, Estes stipulated that he had violated the terms of his supervised release from a 2003 conviction. The District Court1 sentenced him within the advisory Guidelines range to concurrent prison terms of 262 months on Counts 1-6, 240 months on Count 7, and 18 months on the supervised-release revocation; a life term of supervised release; and a fine of $20,000. On appeal, Estes’s counsel has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in *969which she seeks to withdraw, challenges the sentence as unreasonable, and — citing *United States v. Burkholder, 590 F.3d*1071 (9th Cir.2010) — argues that the District Court erred in allowing victim impact statements to be attached to the presentence report.

We conclude that the District Court took into account all the relevant sentencing factors, committed no procedural error, and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. *See United States v. Feemster,*572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc) (describing factors that demonstrate procedural error); *United States v. Watson,*480 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th Cir.) (explaining how a district court may abuse its discretion so that it imposes an unreasonable sentence), *cert. denied,*552 U.S. 927, 128 S.Ct. 305, 169 L.Ed.2d 219 (2007); *see also United States v. Barnett,*574 F.3d 600, 603-04 (8th Cir.) (holding that concurrent 240-month prison sentences for one count of receiving and one count of possessing child pornography were not unreasonable), *cert. denied,*— U.S. ---, 130 S.Ct. 766, 175 L.Ed.2d 533 (2009). Further, we are not persuaded that *Burkholder*requires detachment of victim statements from the presentence report, see 590 F.3d at 1074-77, and we conclude that the District Court’s decision on this issue was not erroneous.

Having reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
NE03 

MN07 

SDOO 

TX19 

NDOO 

IA04 

AROI 

OK03 

TX13 

KSOI 

IAOI 

NEOI 

KYOI 

IA02 

KY02 

ID02 

IA03 

WI07 

WA04 

OR02 

KY04 

MNOI 

WI03 

GA08 

PAIO 

LAOS 

ME02 

M008 

M006 

KY06 

MS02 

KS04 

MTOO 

KY05 

IL15 

TN08 

SC07 

MI07 

Continued on next page. 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 
NC07 

WV02 

OK02 

PA05 

PA09 

C004 

VTOO 

SC06 

WVOI 

UTOI 

IDOi 

WV03 

WI08 

GA12 

MI06 

UT02 

IN02 

GA02 

NY23 

KS02 

MSOI 

CAIO 

TXll 

NM02 

NC03 

NCOI 

NY27 

IL17 

WI02 

TX04 

MI10 

C003 

VA05 

IL13 

TX27 

CA03 

PA03 

MN08 

Continued on next page. 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 
IL18 

IN06 

WYOO 

TN06 

UT03 

NY22 

OK04 

TN07 

IL12 

WA05 

AL05 

IL16 

SC03 

SC02 

LA03 

MI04 

TX23 

AR04 

CAOl 

MS03 

NY24 

MIOl 

NC06 

WI06 

PA12 

VA04 

MN06 

IN04 

PA04 

TX17 

NH02 

CA16 

NCll 

TX34 

M004 

WA08 

TX15 

GAlO 

Continued on next page. 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 
PAll 

AL04 

NV02 

FL02 

MA09 

NJ02 

OROS 

OR04 

VAOl 

MI02 

TN04 

NY21 

AL02 

M003 

MAOl 

OH07 

AL03 

NC13 

TN02 

NC05 

GAOl 

CA21 

IN09 

PAI6 

MS04 

WAOl 

WI05 

AR02 

NC08 

VA07 

OROl 

AZOl 

MI03 

TX28 

NM03 

HI02 

PAI5 

TNOl 

Continued on next page. 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 
AR03 

ALOI 

IN05 

NY19 

SC05 

TX25 

LA04 

FL26 

MN02 

NY18 

TN09 

UT04 

VA02 

AZ02 

MA02 

OH04 

PA07 

IL02 

IN08 

MA04 

TX06 

CA23 

CA24 

NJ07 

VA06 

AKOO 

NC02 

RIOl 

CA20 

OHOS 

OHIO 

IN03 

Continued on next page. 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 
OH05 

AL07 

C002 

FL05 

CA04 

CA05 

CT02 

OH06 

OKOl 

TX05 

WA02 

CA09 

MN04 

CA22 

CT05 

GA14 

LA06 

MN03 

CA07 

NJ05 

NYOl 

PA18 

RI02 

AL06 

FL03 

FL15 

INOl 

MA06 

MI05 

MI08 

NV04 

OH03 

OK05 

TN03 

TX08 

VA09 

FL17 

NE02 

Continued on next page. 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 
NC04 

OH02 

SC04 

TX26 

WIOI 

CA2S 

CASI 

C006 

FL06 

FLI I 

FL12 

GA04 

MEOI 

MD08 

MA03 

MNOS 

MOOS 

NY2S 

OH09 

OH16 

PA17 

TX02 

TX22 

CA02 

CA08 

coos 

CT04 

FL07 

FL14 

FL16 

GAll 

KS03 

KY03 

MD06 

MA08 

MI12 

NHOI 

NCIO 

Continued on next page. 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 
0Hl2 

0Hl5 

PA06 

TN05 

TXOI 

TX12 

TXI6 

TX21 

TX24 

TX36 

VA03 

WA03 

WAlO 

loans 

outstanding on 

12/31/2016 who 

1

1ncludes direct FO,OL, EM, and EE loans. 

Sources: USDA FSA OBFN and Farm Business Plan Databases; U.S. Census 115 

Congressional District Cartographical Shape Files. 

Continued on next page.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael K. LEWIS, Defendant—Appellant, v. Terry MASSEY; Claretta Taylor; Thurman Speight; Janet Speight; Phyllis Hubbard; Paula Gordon, Movants.

No. 09-4885.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.

*737See also, 2010 WL 3868378.

Booth M. Ripke, Nathans & Biddle, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Gina L. Simms, Jonathan Su, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.*

*

 This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael K. Lewis appeals from his seventy-eight month sentence imposed pursuant to his guilty plea to wire and bankruptcy fraud. On appeal, Lewis asserts that his sentence was unreasonable based upon the district court’s failure to fully consider and apply the statutory sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006). Finding no error, we affirm.

A sentence is reviewed for abuse of discretion with the review encompassing both procedural soundness and substantive reasonableness. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The district court is not required to list every § 3553(a) factor in fashioning a sentence, *see United States v. Montes-Pineda,*445 F.3d 375, 380 (4th Cir.2006), and the record reflects that the court listened to Lewis’s arguments and properly considered both the proffered evidence and the § 3553(a) factors.

It is undisputed that Lewis’s sentence was within the properly calculated Sentencing Guidelines range. A sentence within the Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable. Applying this presumption of reasonableness to Lewis’s sentence, *see United States v. Go,*517 F.3d 216, 218 (4th Cir.2008), we conclude that Lewis cannot rebut the presumption of reasonableness and that his sentence is reasonable. *738The district court provided detailed and appropriate reasoning for its chosen sentence, and Lewis’s disagreement with the factors that the court chose to rely upon does not support a conclusion that the court abused its discretion.

Accordingly, we affirm Lewis’s sentence and deny his petition for immediate release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                                /s/ William J. Ryan
                                                --------------------------
                                          Name: William J. Ryan
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 4, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Banknorth Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Banknorth Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1
                      List of Subsidiaries of the Company

List of Subsidiary                                 Jurisdiction
---------------------                              ------------
Charles Mall Company Limited Partnership               Maryland
DeBartolo Capital Partnership                          Delaware
DeBartolo Properties, Inc.                             Delaware
DeBartolo Properties II, Inc.                          Delaware
DeBartolo Properties III, Inc.                         Delaware
East Towne Mall Company Limited Partnership           Tennessee
Forestville Associates                                 Maryland
Forum Finance Corp                                     Delaware
Golden Ring Mall Company Limited Partnership            Indiana
Jefferson Valley Mall Limited Partnership              Delaware
Knoxville Developers Limited Partnership                Indiana
The Retail Property Trust                         Massachusetts
Shopping Center Associates                             Delaware
Simon Property Group (Delaware), Inc.                  Delaware
Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.                  Illinois
Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.                        Texas
Simon DeBartolo Group, L.P.                            Delaware
SD Property Group, Inc.                                    Ohio
SDG Properties VII, Inc.                               Delaware
SDG Dadeland Associates, Inc.                          Delaware
SDG Dadeland Developers, Inc.                          Delaware
SDG EQ Associates, Inc.                                Delaware
SDG Orland, Inc.                                       Delaware
SDG Fashion Mall, Inc.                                 Delaware
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

Pursuant to the provision of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. § 552b), notice is hereby given of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's (Board) meeting described below. 

# TIME AND DATE OF MEETING:

9 a.m., February 22, 2001. 

# PLACE:

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public Hearing Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004. 

# STATUS:

Open. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (“Board”) will reconvene and continue the fourteenth quarterly open meeting conducted on February 13, 2001, regarding the status of progress of the activities associated with the Department of Energy's Implementation Plans for the Board's Recommendation 95-2,                         Integrated Safety Management                         (“ISM”), Recommendation 98-1,                         Integrated Safety Management (Response to Issues Identified by the Office of Internal Oversight),                         and Recommendation 2000-2,                         Configuration Management, Vital Safety Systems.                         Topics will include the roles of line management in executing these Implementation Plans and the budgetary resources required to satisfy the Department's commitments.                     

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Richard A. Azzaro, General Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board reserves its right to further schedule and otherwise regulate the course of this meeting, to recess, reconvene, postpone or adjourn the meeting, and otherwise exercise its authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. 

Dated: February 13, 2001. 

John T. Conway, 

Chairman. 

[FR Doc. 01-4074 Filed 2-13-01; 4:41 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Investors Income Properties (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 14, 2008     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 14, 2008     





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.