alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
—— a £«

-2 0 a.

c %

•v. o It 6-K- ,sr MM6070* Ql=H£. 6i CiadrJt- $A± JCQ

### uV e^sA-i_m_cudLo 5_ty_Sj^a_\_e.3 >h<a .yes6p'<\AtriQl Ccxsn nunvp^n jt/ -ty ^qq %£%-• eft 

### _fiJJ_e.S—CfrggAe. ua Ln&JOL-pioucQ—p&Ai-C^jag. TM& A-feato ung ICU-QijPctfiLs-AL»\eg^ pa^—dcj-cud* ^AlafiJgy_pu^s^_p\< eg so Cue- <VSl_l«Q ^- 

### 3 cLg. €Uc. i3 - Pof^ » e.f\eiro <U| IXo>V me. A\\gron que, -Veniq qd^
2 % \*c\n.r> f>\ <>g>ifvVrc^V0 Ag_ el e.t\ ctvy <Le^a<4- rorv m* Wi\a eA xwe. l>|o «^ac_ e\ rvo o\e At^o fluc-eVcy XauiU'wq flof-Wy fut^s ciAVcS erv ^qosAo \_V_g qvju AtfWo Qucsi rqf\ceVQ.rC| rtve. Uian oi AaV nr\e_no.S ft, ^b,^ ps_rc^_C/^_

, _<djA_<ci er\_esje, wxismO—^>q^>_S5\o Vol UVme. >Qj^_Yajrja-]<\_Ct l^g^os cL-\g<La-4 

### 4cr^ me giiya pn Cvrm<»«> uio -Ve- VJej4 °i do./" proV>g4-icPn aS\ <r\e <k\\Q £\ ^h % <f ^0C3 &a\ oAr^ <Y\e^> QU<1 ^ua iTQ CPf-W f\ lO Xe-Qc\oV>^r 'fOcS Cj>^ 

### -t^^ \o CA^rg'ka Vafo. gnVtq, u ^{n-Wq^ca cjbh \a es^QSa dffc/ fiille!c/'«lo nr>gS O^ lAg> QQ 'SaVitq que- ejsg pe^Song ^erg l<^ e_spoSA <Ad (^ lUc^o <nr\o.s y? 

### (e. f^Jua4^- Q'vJtAA ^ ^(tc 0^>^ qU<e.r\ UjL pla-V<Cg yvi^. At|o n* -Vml put5 e,^e, X.tg \0~lo~m me. pre^e(\Ae. a\a Cof-Ve. n pue,«=, Crs^_<kL\iD. : 1 • :

_ : : : • teA K loogodo fcufvVJ fv\e A^q iS-sAg cuV \u tjlVi<V\q Co/4e_. l\o ct\C. Qu~<A&. 

### S&<^TCC<\AiA^ u_jme^Ai\Q--Ae_jJfln_fl_^ditiCJL£Lj&J5^s^DL^u(f.i!^s_o^ Vfr ^Jf -jjucz-g .X^_ A*, T^e? <s?:qs MIg- A^\g. uA m<>- grsovcAU gup me. Uc^ ^



### QiyuAa/ eis po^ f.5s& cjuy>_ l<t gLsWy yctCjcir\An u nne, At\o ^ero Ocx cv<r "^ 4e vJoy a \2ep<cJse.A.<Vg^ yvias es4«? r«s Vg olVitv\«i r-nf\< £\rmc^s o -jj 

### VDU5COS Q,Vj uit (\ Qr\Q«y f»q,5 ll o\r_ Al\g. Ao pUe.Ac Uscci^Q fW<£ ^ UA e5 my •fitV>ocjqclo ,q (U \x\f Alfo Quf.mf.log ^Wv^q/' u^ (d 0 noAg.Uc( Varo/U p^g s o^e ctv^Vo M y\a \\o/ar\Ao Ct^rnc u An 

### Xe C\u*_ tio r>o nucrya QAQ (X^lgcil6i\ £A A Qv-Vo fo / s«?o *fjs me.AV?irq gj* ^e. Vo JWjlo normj/ pgdfe. c\o <vaAa<wQ_5 £cr«t\<-u rs Ao <L , )±\\c\ gA ^

A-oy: pjfolaaAVo^g ,- lA Que.5f. ostxoc&Qry ynucVo / fnqs tAo no se. ngciq lA-£» LtL_Cj^Cjj±Q__Vg> <^u e.^ej^orN_e_Ax-£iQ >VqcAWc.jfV_OPLg> A^_e cjue. aI faWcl££ Ue.fl.ta^AocvqJo - A«*-wA>ff0/ <^a-^ cjo ao S<- fy <\_dU <^sfl <^& Aa^o el K^oagjq^O LjxfrtO/ X.i s^uip^A m<^yVvu\oo oa e.{(or/ a <wu r>o n\d. -e-^-pIfrarqn, ^Jcirfg; 

### g-u-^_CQ-m_eJby^_uy__s [ esi&^jOQjLLyJ&>XL<ipeAA-LL^_^_iA ^.tv^u'3^-tciA^ ^>sr\\£v * 9jc*-Q—u^-qo-'sterg o<vtx K^e.Vacfoy\ ^y\< Pauc/ ^.yocUAmt , g--3. \*± V<~? M^ , v\-o 5g. fY\ocAv6 X«2_ e^Vo - O C^agAg me ^eAAtrgc/g^Qr) 6t t0 - lo - If {cj rt^cz^ <vie. VvaV^Vo <sV A^q ^ Ag_D<Ao^o^<- lM u ,y^c Vnan icura^ UA^ ft.V»a^g^ 0s 

### Ae.VgsAg.Ao ^e. \VaAA<^ WvV<j ^m^k gAlo a\^ Mt^ u_wyC Ai|t, <?sperq a<jui \, (o^rt^ q K^.\)\ri^ cog \a O'uc^LQ ^ 'J^ ^tIU rv\g- Puc«L> XaY dl pgoe.1 ^>a<Q c^t/r fift^^ yo \^ V<f<^t- m m<:_<\At& es-^e.<\ a5^g qoc \c \\gmcg, p^.«^\ <?i/« v/cn.^ <t-y ^1^" ^pelQ.c'ca £rqUk5 CS Tb<U;(c!vjc_ 0<03 Vo5 ©efvAileiqJ). ^1

cr JQ

( 8 '3

a10

Ui Q,
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States      Code)**

(1)        The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| Dated:                November 13, 2006 | */s/                Edward H.                Myles                                                    * |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | *Edward                H. Myles*                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                    | Vice                President of Finance & Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                    | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
Argued and submitted September 16,

reversed and remanded October 8, 2014

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Felix V. Robles, Claimant. Felix V. ROBLES, *Petitioner, v.*SAIF CORPORATION, William T. Boyer, and Marcine Boyer, *Respondents.*

Workers’ Compensation Board

1200189; A153691

337 P3d 924

Julene M. Quinn argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Julie Masters argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Lagesen, Judge.

PER CURIAM
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM KERRY STEPHENS,

Appellant,

v.

EXECUFLIGHT, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1499

[April 27, 2023]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ellen Feld, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

COWE18-007130.

Charles M. Eiss of Law Offices of Charles Eiss, P.L., Plantation, for 

appellant.

Andrew S. Douglas of Andrew Douglas, P.A., Weston, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 10.5.4  QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION THREE YEAR
                EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                BETWEEN QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION AND J.
                L. THOMAS DATED JULY 1, 1998.


                QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
                        THREE YEAR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Executive:  J. L. Thomas
                  ----------------

The undersigned executive does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting on June 25, 1998, the Board of Directors of Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association acted to renew and extend the Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association Three Year Employment Agreement with the
undersigned executive to September 25, 2000, his sixty-fifth birthday, as
specified in the Employment Agreement document.


Dated this 1st day of July, A.D., 1998. 


                                    QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND
                                    LOAN ASSOCIATION



  /s/ Jerome L. Thomas              By: /s/ Frederic R. McGill
 ---------------------------           --------------------------
 Executive                             President
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

Facts about Creating a New Login for the TSP 

& Two Acknowledgement Letters

 

 June 2022

On June 1, 2022, the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board changed 

recordkeepers for Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) participants. 

• Participants’ funds remained invested in accordance with their previous 

investment choices. 

As a result of the transition, all participants and beneficiaries must set up a new login for 

the new My Account. 

The new login makes a secure system even safer. It is a one-time setup process that 

requires participants to verify their identity, create a username and password, update 

their contact information, and set up their account security.

• The ability to claim and create account access online is different from the 

previous process where a participant received a temporary password in the mail. 

• Should participants not be able to verify their identity online, the TSP can still 

mail them a PIN to allow them to move forward with the login process. 

After you have created a new login, the TSP will mail participants two

acknowledgement letters. 

One acknowledgement letter will say, “Your Account Has Been Claimed.” This 

indicates that the participant has successfully completed the login process. 

The other acknowledgement letter will say “Your Contact Information Has Changed.” 

This indicates that the participant has successfully provided contact information during 

the login process.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald
      S. BlaskieVice
      President and Chief Financial Officer ofSCI
      Engineered Materials, Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)August
      5, 2009
#### Yashpal SAINI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-70062.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

*589Nicholas W. Marchi, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Nancy E. Friedman, Esq., Terri Jane Scardon, Joshua E. Braunstein, Esq., John S. Stevens Fax, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

memorandum; **

Respondent’s opposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen as untimely because the motion to reopen was filed more than ninety days after the BIA’s prior decision. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3); *Rodriguez-Lariz v.*INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

I, Paul Marciano,Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Guess?, Inc.(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

·       theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

·       the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

| Date: February 28, 2007 | By:    | /s/ PAUL MARCIANO                                       |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Paul Marciano                                           |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer and  Vice Chairman of the Board |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Guess?, Inc. and will be retained by Guess?, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Manuel SOTO-YANES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-50123

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 3, 2011.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*811Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Manuel Soto-Yanes (Soto) appeals the 60-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation. Soto argues that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. He does not argue a procedural error. We generally review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion in light of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 519-20 (5th Cir.2005); *United States v. Delgado-Martinez,*564 F.3d 750, 752 (5th Cir.2009). “A discretionary sentence imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range is presumptively reasonable.” *United States v.Campos-Maldonado,*531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir.2008). However, Soto acknowledges that he did not object to the reasonableness of the sentence after it was imposed. Therefore, under this circuit’s precedent, review is for plain error. *See United States v. Peltier,*505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.2007).

Soto’s argument that application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 renders his sentence unreasonable because it effectively results in the double counting of a defendant’s criminal history has been rejected by this court. *See United States v. Duarte,*569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 378, 175 L.Ed.2d 231 (2009). Although the instant reentry offense was not necessarily a crime of violence, Soto has a history of repetitive criminal conduct, including violent crime. Even if we accept Soto’s assertion regarding his motive for returning to this country, he has not shown that his sentence was unreasonable, nor has he rebutted the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to his within-Guideline sentence. *See Campos-Maldonado,*531 F.3d at 338. Accordingly, he has not shown error, plain or otherwise.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 10.47




                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                   ----------------------------------------

     Second Amendment to Employment Agreement ("Agreement"), dated as of July
1, 2002, by and among PANAMERICAN BEVERAGES, INC., a company organized under
the laws of the Republic of Panama (together with its successors and assigns,
the "Company"), PANAMCO, L.L.C., a limited liability company organized under
the laws of the State of Delaware (together with its successors and assigns,
"Panamco") and CRAIG D. JUNG (the "Executive").


                             W I T N E S S E T H :

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement, dated
February 27, 2002, between the parties hereto ("Employment Agreement") to
clarify the definition of "Termination Date" set forth in Exhibit A to the
Employment Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is mutually acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

     1.   Section (m)(iv) of Exhibit A to the Employment Agreement is hereby
          amended to read as follows:

     "in the case of a voluntary termination or Termination without Cause
     by the Company, the last day of the Executive's employment."

     2.  Except as specifically amended in Section 1 above, the Employment
Agreement remains in full force and effect.

     3.  This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall be deemed to
be one and the same instrument. Signatures delivered by facsimile shall be
valid and binding for all purposes.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of
the date first set forth above.

                                      PANAMERICAN BEVERAGES, INC.


                                      By:
                                         /s/ William G. Cooling
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         William G. Cooling
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>

                                      PANAMCO, L.L.C.



                                      By:
                                         /s/ William G. Cooling
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         William G. Cooling
                                         Chief Executive Officer



                                      The Executive



                                      By:
                                         /s/ Craig D. Jung
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Craig D. Jung
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. |   | The                      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                      or 15(d) of                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                      and |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. |   | The                            information contained in the Report fairly presents,                            in all material                            respects, the financial condition and results of operations                            of the                            Company. |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Paul                          D.                          ColasonoU                                                               |   |   |   |
| Paul                              D. ColasonoChief                              Financial OfficerMay                              15, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Timothy Gaylord, Chief Executive Officer of Capital Directions, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and          
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Capital
Directions, Inc.

Date: August 8, 2003

| |                                                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Timothy P. Gaylord
Timothy P. Gaylord
Chief Executive Officer

20
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LabOne, Inc.

 

LabOne, Inc.

Date:  November 9, 2004
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lacarlos Demond CURETON, a/k/a Loco, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7224.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 26, 2011.

Lacarlos Demond Cureton, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*709PER CURIAM:

Lacarlos Demond Cureton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Cureton,*No. 0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*