alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**






STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dark Dynamite Inc (the
      "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wang,
      Xiao Jun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun


Chief
      Financial Officer





May
      19,
      2006







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
<PAGE>
 
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


     Effective July 1, 1997, First Savings adopted the provisions of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share  ("SFAS 128"),
which establishes standards for computing and presenting earnings per share
(EPS) data.  SFAS 128 simplifies the standards for computing EPS previously
found in APB Opinion No. 15, "Earnings Per Share," and makes them comparable to
international EPS standards.  Under SFAS 128, basic EPS replaces the former
presentation of primary EPS.  Also, a dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS
is required on the face of the income statement for all entities with complex
capital structures, and a reconciliation must be provided of the numerator and
denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the
diluted EPS computation.  In accordance with SFAS 128, all prior period EPS data
have been restated.

Basic net income per share for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 was
$1.42, $1.05 and $1.05, respectively.  Diluted net income per share for the same
periods was $1.31, $0.98 and $0.98, respectively.  Basic net income per share,
or basic EPS, is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if First  if First Savings' dilutive stock options
were exercised.  The numerator of the basic EPS computation is the same as the
numerator of the diluted EPS computation for all periods presented.  A
reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations is
as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                1998       1997       1996
                                              ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>        <C>
Basic EPS denominator - weighted average
 number of common shares outstanding          3,698,197  3,706,704  3,744,000
Dilutive share effect arising from assumed
 exercise of stock options                      323,757    263,602    249,070
                                              ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Diluted EPS denominator                       4,021,954  3,970,306  3,993,070
                                              =========  =========  =========
</TABLE>
Back to Contents

Exhibit 12.1

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Todd Bruce, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Crystallex International Corporation (the “registrant”), certify that:

1.   Based on my knowledge, the Annual Report onForm 20-F/A-No. 2 for the year ended December 31, 2002 (“Form 20-F”), of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information contained in Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Date: October 21, 2004

/s/ Todd Bruce                                     Todd BrucePresident and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crystallex International Corporation and will be retained by such corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

76

----
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

July 9, 2020 
 Gary Burnison 

c/o Korn Ferry 
 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2600 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 
  

	RE:	 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 30, 2018 between Korn Ferry (“Korn
Ferry”) and Gary Burnison (“Employment Agreement”) and the Letter Agreement dated as of April 14, 2020 


 Dear
Gary: 
 Reference is made to the Letter Agreement, dated April 14, 2020, between you and Korn Ferry, which amended the applicable terms and conditions
of your Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement Amendment”). This letter amends the Employment Agreement Amendment by deleting the reference to “August 31, 2020” and substituting in its stead “December 31,
2020”, having the effect of extending the temporary reduction of your annual rate of base salary described in the Employment Agreement Amendment through December 31, 2020. It is agreed that the extension of the temporary salary reduction
above shall not, alone, be a basis for Good Reason or any constructive termination claim and does not constitute Good Reason under your Employment Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this letter, the terms and conditions set forth in the
Employment Agreement and the Employment Agreement Amendment remain in full force and effect and are incorporated herein by reference. 
 Please indicate
your acceptance of this letter agreement amending your Employment Agreement and the Employment Agreement Amendment by signing and dating a copy of this letter agreement in the spaces provided below and returning such signed and dated copy to me. I
thank you for your continued commitment to Korn Ferry. 
  

							
		 		 		 	Sincerely,
		 		 		 	 /s/ Christina Gold

		 		 		 	Christina Gold

 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: 
  

							
	 /s/ Gary D. Burnison
	 		 		 	 July 9,
2020                                        


	Gary D. Burnison	 		 		 	 Date of Signature
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2645

To provide for the disposal of certain surplus real property located at Fort

Ord, California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15, 1993

Mr. FARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide for the disposal of certain surplus real property

located at Fort Ord, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY AT

4 FORT ORD, CALIFORNIA.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall

6 grant options for the conveyance, without reimbursement,

7 to the University of California and the California State

8 University of all right, title, and interest of the United

9 States in and to those parcels of real property described

10 in subsection (b) including appropriate atmospheric, land
2

•HR 2645 IH

1 and water rights, infrastructure and improvements there2 on, which are located at Ford Ord, California. Each option

3 granted under this subsection shall be exercisable without

4 regard to any other such options. The Secretary shall not

5 impose as part of the conveyance under this subsection

6 any condition or restriction on the use of the conveyed

7 real property by the recipients.

8 (b) DESCRIPTION.—The exact acreage and legal de9 scriptions of the parcels to be conveyed under subsection

10 (a) shall either—

11 (1) substantially conform to the description of

12 the land and facilities requested in the Educational

13 Public Benefit Transfer Applications submitted by

14 the University of California and the California State

15 University with regard to Fort Ord on or before

16 March 8, 1993, as supplemented or amended

17 through September 30, 1993; or

18 (2) consist of such alternative parcels as shall,

19 after negotiation, be mutually acceptable to the Sec20 retary and the recipient institutions.

Æ
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PUI

- KWONG CHAN, MAY SUNG MAK, YUN WANG, Appellants

v.

BAIZHEN YANG, SONGJIAN WANG, Appellees

______________________

2016

- 1214

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,025.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

R OBERT B AUER

, Bauer Law Offices, Erie, PA

, argued for appellants. Also represented by A LBERT W. C HAN

, Law Offices of Albert Wai

- Kit Chan, PLLC, Whitestone,
NY.

S TEPHANIE S CRUGGS , Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Washington, DC, ar gued for appellees.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, M OORE

, and W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 27, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony J. MARCANTONI, a/k/a Mr. Purple, a/k/a The Italian, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-5044.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 10, 2014.

Decided: April 25, 2014.

*230Robin M. Earnest, Law Office of Robin Earnest, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellant. Mara Zusman Greenberg, Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony J. Marcantoni pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2012). The district court sentenced Marcantoni to 121 months of imprisonment. Marcantoni filed a timely notice of appeal. Five months later, Marcantoni filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3504 (2012), to discover whether the Government had intercepted any communications between Marcantoni’s counsel and counsel for his codefendants. The district court denied Marcantoni’s motion and Marcantoni did not file a notice of appeal of that order. On appeal, Marcan-toni argues that the district court erred in denying his motion. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal based on the waiver of appellate rights contained in the plea agreement. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court and deny as moot the motion to dismiss.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, a defendant may waive his appellate rights under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2012). *United States v. Wiggins,*905 F.2d 51, 53 (4th Cir.1990). A waiver will preclude appeal of a specific issue if the waiver is valid and the issue is within the scope of the waiver. *United States v. Bliek,*408 F.3d 162, 168 (4th Cir.2005). The question of whether a defendant validly waived his right to appeal is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. *Id.*at 168.

Here, the appellate waiver included any appeal of the conviction and sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), except a sentence above the advisory Guidelines range. While we conclude that Marcantoni knowingly and intelligently agreed to waive his right to appeal, Marcantoni has not challenged his conviction or sentence on appeal. Rather, Marcantoni challenges only the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion pursuant to § 3504. As Marcanto-ni failed to file a notice of appeal of the district court’s order denying his motion, however, that order is not before this court.

Accordingly, we affirm Marcantoni’s conviction and sentence, and deny as moot the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Domestic Inspection Fu

Public Health Information 

(PHIS)

Charles L. Gioglio, Director

Labeling and Program Delivery D

Policy and Program Development

NACMPI February 5-6, 2008
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Domestic Inspection Fu

Public Health Information 

• PHIS Contains four Major Func

– Domestic Inspection Functions 

• Establishment Profile• In-plant inspection• FSA’s

– Import Inspection Function– Export Certification Function– Predictive Analytics 
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Domestic Inspection F

• A New Application that will Help FS

its Strategic Initiatives by:

– Collecting Detailed Information Regar

Verifications, Compliance, and other irelated activities

– Facilitate Analysis of Specific Data at 

Field levels in order to Identify and Ev

– Focus Inspection Activities in plants o

vulnerable to microbiological contamiprocess control is not maintained
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Domestic Inspection F

– Incorporate New Food Safety As

(FSA) reporting instrument integfrom in-plant inspections and EIA

– Prioritize Deployable FSIS Reso

IVTs) to focus on establishmentevidence of lack of process cont
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Domestic Inspection F

– Provide user friendly, web-based

inspection teams supplying data results, sample requests and resand enforcement status

– Integrate Seamlessly with other 

Planned Systems Permitting UseData from Multiple Programs in a Different Dimensions
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Key Enhancements over 

• System will Document Specific Pro

Product Category, Regulatory RequVerified, and the Method of Verifica

• Key Benefits Include:

– Ability to use data at all levels to analy

direct inspection resources where nee

– Ability to provide data to enhance man

controls and identify training needs
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Key Enhancements over 

• The System’s Establishment P

Provide:

– Enhanced Operational Establish

Information such as types of inteused

– Enhanced Demographic Informa

processing activities, product voldefense activities, in order to infosampling programs, and direct inverification activities 
United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Key Enhancements over 

• The system will provide the ability to docu

maintain forms such as the Memoranda o(MOI) for weekly plant awareness meetinthe Food Defense Memorandum of Interv5420-1 and 5420-4. 

• The new FSA will have questions that are 

and questions that prompt the EIAO to ancollected data and explain their findings, establishment documents as support for enforcement actions. This structure will fenhanced critical thinking by EIAOs.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Bankhead, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Bankhead,*123 Ohio St.3d 143, 2009-Ohio-4303.]

(No. 2007-0818

Submitted July 14, 2009

Decided September 1, 2009.)

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Bloomer,*122 Ohio St.3d 200, 2009-Ohio-2462, 909 N.E.2d 1254. Appellant is discharged from postrelease control because he has completed serving his prison *144sentence and, pursuant to *State v. Bezak,*114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, is no longer subject to resentencing.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Michaela M. Stagnaro, for appellant.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2677

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Received

AN ACT

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, and construct the West Court

of the National Museum of Natural History building.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF

4 WEST COURT OF NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NAT5 URAL HISTORY BUILDING.

6 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution

7 is authorized to plan, design, and construct the West

8 Court of the National Museum of Natural History build9 ing.
2

•HR 2677 RDS

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING.

2 No appropriated funds may be used to pay any ex3 pense of the planning, design, and construction authorized

4 by section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R E D J AY OT T O, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. F E D E R A L B U R E A U O F P R IS O N S ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 56438 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 2 - c v - 0 6 0 1 4 - MMMCW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a r ga r e tM . M orr ow , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r9, 2013 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , M . S M IT H , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P l a i nt i f f F r e d O tt o appe a l s pr o s e the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of hi s r e que s tf

or pr e l i m i na ryi nj unc t i ve r e l i e f a ga i ns tde f

e nda ntpr i s on of

f i c i a l s . W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 2 ( a ) ( 1 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED

SEP 10 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12-56438 2 O urs ol e i nqui ryi s w he the rthe di s tr i c tc ourtabus e d i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng p r e lim in a ryin

ju n c tiv e r e lie f

, a n dw e c o n c lu d e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n . W

in te rv . N a tu ra l R es o u r c es D e

fe n s e C o u n c il , 555 U . S . 7, 24 ( 2008) ( lis tin g f a c to r s f o rd is tr ic t c o u rt to c o n s id e r ) ; S p o rt s Fo rm , In c. v. U

n i ted P ress Int ’l , 68 6 F . 2d 75 0, 75 2-53 (9th C i r. 19 82 ) ( expl ai ni ng l i m i t ed sc op e of r evi ew ). AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         421,489
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               137,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,174,210
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,918,449
<ALLOWANCE>                                     62,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,056,083
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,268,555
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,171,841
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             64,616
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          100,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     450,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,056,083
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                261,571
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               54,318
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,862
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               317,751
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             107,409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,741
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          179,601
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  51
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                135,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,496
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      83,496
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                     37,559
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,324
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,239
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                64,783
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,571
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,749
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               62,961
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            62,961
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
ROYAL BODYCARE, INC.





Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002 (the
Report), I, Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/    CLINTON H.
HOWARDClinton H. Howard Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer November 13,
2002





This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.




33