Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2001 / Notices 13319

F Street), on business days between 7

a.m. and 5 p.m. [FAX number (202)

898–3838; Internet address: comments@

fdic.gov]. Comments may also be

submitted to the OMB desk officer for

the FDIC: Alexander Hunt, Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget, New

Executive Office Building, Room 3208,

Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tamara R. Manly, at the address

identified above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Proposal To Renew the Following

Currently Approved Collection of

Information

Title: Extensions of Credit to

Executive Officers, Unsafe and Unsound

Practices.

OMB Number: 3064–0108.

Frequency of Response: Annually.

Affected Public: All financial

institutions.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

4,000.

Estimated Number of Responses:

8,000.

Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

8,000 hours.

General Description of Collection: The

information collection and

recordkeeping requirements are

mandated by statute and take the form

of (1) a report by executive officers of

insured nonmember banks to their

boards of directors within 10 days of

incurring any indebtedness to any other

bank in an amount in excess of the

amount the insured nonmember bank

could lend to the officer, and (2) a report

from insured nonmember banks,

included with their reports of condition

filed with the FDIC, on any extensions

of credit made by the bank to its

executive officers since the bank filed

its last report of condition.

Request for Comment

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the collection of information is

necessary for the proper performance of

the FDIC’s functions, including whether

the information has practical utility; (b)

the accuracy of the estimates of the

burden of the information collection,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the

burden of the information collection on

respondents, including through the use

of automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

At the end of the comment period, the

comments and recommendations

received will be analyzed to determine

the extent to which the collection

should be modified prior to submission

to OMB for review and approval.

Comments submitted in response to this

notice also will be summarized or

included in the FDIC’s requests to OMB

for renewal of this collection. All

comments will become a matter of

public record.

Dated at Washington, DC, this 28th day of

February, 2001.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–5243 Filed 3–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714–01–U

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 01–03]

Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc. v. Altraco, Inc.;

Notice of Filing of Complaint and

Assignment

Notice is given that a complaint has

been filed with the Federal Maritime

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) by

Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc. (‘‘Complainant’’

or ‘‘Pactrans’’) against Altraco, Inc.

(‘‘Respondent’’).

Complainant is a non-vessel-operating

common carrier ocean transportation

intermediary. Among other things,

Complainant alleges that Respondent

knowingly and willfully violated

section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of

1984, as amended, (‘‘Shipping Act’’) by

causing Pactrans to lose its maritime

lien and by using an unfair device or

means to gain free transportation.

Complainant asks that the Commission

issue an order against Respondent

finding it in violation of the Shipping

Act. Complainant also asks for an order

compelling Respondent to make

reparations to Complainant in an

amount to be proved at an

administrative hearing, plus interest,

costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees; an

order holding that the Respondent’s

activities described in the complaint are

unlawful and in violation of section

10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act and

ordering that Respondent cease and

desist from such unlawful activities;

and such other and further relief as the

Commission deems just and proper.

Complainant requests that hearing be

held in Washington, DC.

This proceeding has been assigned to

the office of Administrative Law Judges.

Hearing in this matter, if any is held,

shall commence within the time

limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,

and only after consideration has been

given by the parties and the presiding

officer to the use of alternative forms of

dispute resolution. The hearing shall

include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the

presiding officer only upon proper

showing that there are genuine issues of

material fact that cannot be resolved on

the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,

depositions, or other documents or that

the nature of the matter in issue is such

that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the

development of an adequate record.

Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR

502.61, the initial decision of the

presiding officer in this proceeding shall

be issued by February 25, 2002, and the

final decision of the Commission shall

be issued by June 25, 2002.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–4929 Filed 3–2–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 01–02]

Notice of Filing of Complaint and

Assignment

In the matter of Transworld Shipping

(USA), Inc. v. FMI Forwarding (San

Francisco), Inc. a/k/a Inter-Maritime

Forwarding Co. (San Francisco), Inc. and

Inter-Maritime Forwarding Company,

Incorporated—A Division of Union-Transport

Corporation, a/k/a Inter-Maritime Forwarding

Co., Inter-Maritime Container Line and

Union-Transport Corporation; Notice of

Filing of Complaint and Assignment.

Notice is given that a complaint has

been filed with the Federal Maritime

Commission (‘‘Commission’’), by

Transworld Shipping (USA), Inc.,

(‘‘Complainant’’), against FMI

Forwarding (San Francisco, Inc. a/k/a

Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. (San

Francisco), Inc. (‘‘FMI’’), Inter-Maritime

Forwarding Company, Incorporated A

Division of Union-Transport

Corporation, a/k/a Inter-Maritime

Forwarding Co., Inter-Maritime

Container Line (‘‘IMF’’); and UnionTransport Corporation (‘‘UnionTransport) (collectively,

‘‘Respondents’’).

Complainant is a non-vessel-operating

common carrier Ocean Transportation

Intermediary. Among other things,

Complainant alleges that the

Respondents violated sections 10(a)(1)

and 10(d)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984

and several of the Commission’s freight

forwarder regulations at 46 CFR part 515

by engaging in a pattern of deceit by

booking cargo and mis-representing that

ocean freight charges would be paid,

thereby inducing Complainant to