alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Rexford C. Decker, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BSB Bancorp, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;



5. The registrants other certifying
officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



a) all significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                          |  |                      
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Date: May 10, 2004       
|                          | 
|By:                       |  | /s/ Rexford C. Decker
|                          |  |                      
|Rexford C. Decker        
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  



33
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Kamaal Tavon BLANDING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40455

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 27, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Philip Thomas Cowen, Esq., Law Office of Philip Cowen, Brownsville, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Kamaal Tavon Blanding has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Blanding has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.1 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. We note that while Blanding’s plea agreement waives the right to collaterally attack his conviction or sentence, the district court informed Blanding that he waived the right to collaterally attack his sentence, omitting mention of the conviction. This omission has no effect on the instant appeal. We make no determination at this time of the significance of the omission with respect to any collateral challenge that Blanding might file.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2821-2822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 7

[TD 8938]


Requirements Relating to Certain Exchanges Involving a Foreign 
Corporation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Removal of temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document removes temporary regulations under section 
367(c) that are no longer necessary and, as a result, may be 
misleading.

DATES: Effective Date: January 12, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark D. Harris at (202) 622-3860 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 30, 1977, the IRS and Treasury published in the Federal 
Register proposed regulations (42 FR 65204) and temporary regulations 
(42 FR 65152) under section 367(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. The 
principal purpose of these regulations, Secs. 7.367(c)-1 and 7.367(c)-
2, was to distinguish between the treatment of transfers described in 
section 367(c) before and after the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 
1976 (the Act) (90 Stat. 1634). Before enactment of the Act, transfers 
described in section 367(c) were subject to a ruling requirement. After 
enactment of the Act, transfers described in section 367(c) were within 
the scope of Secs. 7.367(b)-1 through 7.367(b)-12. In light of the 
substantial time that has passed since enactment of the Act and, 
moreover, in light of the fact that Secs. 1.367(b)-1 through 1.367(b)-6 
have substantially superceded Secs. 7.367(b)-1 through 7.367(b)-12, 
Secs. 7.367(c)-1 and 7.367(c)-2 are no longer necessary and may be 
misleading.

    Accordingly, this document removes Secs. 7.367(c)-1 and 7.367(c)-2.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 7

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Removal of Temporary Regulations

    Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, 26 CFR part 7 
is amended as follows:

PART 7--TEMPORARY INCOME TAX REGULATIONS UNDER THE TAX REFORM ACT 
OF 1976

    Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 7 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

[[Page 2822]]

Secs. 7.367(c)-1 and 7.367(c)-2  [Amended]

    Par. 2. Sections 7.367(c)-1 and 7.367(c)-2 are removed.

Robert E. Wenzel,
Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
    Approved: December 28, 2000.
Jonathan Talisman,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 01-489 Filed 1-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 29, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 29, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0025. PIERRE R. CAZEAU et al. v. IH2 PROPERTY GEORGIA, L.P. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2013CV2274
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2060 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2060

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the moving expense 
 deduction for moving expenses associated with the sale of a residence 
     eligible to receive benefits under an approved airport noise 
                         compatibility program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 1993

 Mr. Clement introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the moving expense 
 deduction for moving expenses associated with the sale of a residence 
     eligible to receive benefits under an approved airport noise 
                         compatibility program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Displaced-by-Airport Noise Homeowner 
Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. MOVING EXPENSE DEDUCTION TO APPLY TO MOVES FROM RESIDENCES 
              ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE BENEFITS UNDER AN APPROVED AIRPORT 
              NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 217 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to moving expenses) is amended by redesignating subsection 
(j) as subsection (k) and by inserting after subsection (i) the 
following new subsection:
    ``(j) Special Rules for Moves from Residences Eligible To Receive 
Benefits Under an Approved Airport Noise Compatibility Program.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of noise compatibility 
        program moving expenses--
                    ``(A) this section shall be applied with respect to 
                such expenses as if they were incurred in connection 
                with the commencement of work by the taxpayer as an 
                employee at a new principal place of work,
                    ``(B) the limitations of subsection (c) shall not 
                apply.
            ``(2) Noise compatibility program moving expenses.--For the 
        purposes of this subsection, the term `noise compatibility 
        program moving expenses' means any moving expenses incurred by 
        an individual whose former residence was eligible for benefits 
        under a noise compatibility program--
                    ``(A) undertaken by an airport operator pursuant to 
                title I of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act 
                of 1979, and
                    ``(B) approved by the Secretary of 
                Transportation.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         683,910                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  502,539                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,096                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    514,209                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,849,600                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 588,545                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,561,735                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,152,126                       0
<BONDS>                                        453,645                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    732,397                       0
<COMMON>                                    11,176,256                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,032,237)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,561,735                       0
<SALES>                                      2,158,424                 929,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,158,424                 929,880
<CGS>                                        1,675,579                 709,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,675,579                 709,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,546,323                 592,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (49,833)                (14,290)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,113,311)               (387,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,113,311)               (387,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,113,311)               (387,324)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)                  (0.09)


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2564

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to apply reductions in water supply

during dry years to agricultural water contractors within areas of origin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1993

Mr. FAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Natural Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to apply reductions

in water supply during dry years to agricultural water

contractors within areas of origin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DRY YEAR ALLOCATIONS.

4 For any year in which the Secretary of the Interior

5 determines that no interim water is available for Central

6 Valley Project contractors within counties, watersheds, or

7 other areas of origin, as those terms are utilized under

8 California law, the Secretary is authorized and directed

9 to allocate water supply, including any water shortage per10 centage reduction, to agricultural or municipal and indus-
2

•HR 2564 IH

1 trial water contractors within those counties, watersheds,

2 or other areas of origin on the basis of the greater of the

3 amount of (1) project water under contract, or (2) histori4 cal use (including any interim or transferred water supply

5 used) prior to the date of enactment of this Act, deter6 mined on a per contractor basis. This section shall only

7 apply to those contractors which have a contract with the

8 Secretary for Central Valley Project water that does not

9 include a provision limiting the amount or percentage by

10 which their water supply can be reduced for dry years.

Æ
COVID-19 TEST KITS AVAILABILITY

Item Number Item Names Estimated Date

Available

FSIS-107 COVID-17 Test Kit (BinaxNOW) Ready for Order

FSIS-107A COVID-17 Test Kit (CareStart) Ready for Order

In the future, FSIS may supply other test kits authorized for emergency use by the Food and 

Drug Administration (FDA) and manufactured by other providers with instructions unique to the 

test kit provided.
Exhibit 23.2






CONSENT OF EXPERT





I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-125362, No. 333-134296, No. 333-141321 and No. 333-147547) and Form S-8 (No. 333-142848) of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
of the findings in my report, Projections of Groundwater Impacts in Response to Proposed Pumping from Beneath the Tule Desert in Southeastern Nevada Using MODFLOW-2000, dated June 24, 2008, with respect to the estimated availability of groundwater in the Tule Desert Groundwater Basin appearing in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Tule Desert
Groundwater Basin and Impairment of Water Assets” in the “Water Resource and Water Storage Operations” section of the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. I hereby consent to all references to such report in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and I hereby consent to all references to such report in each such Registration Statement, and further consent to being named as an expert
in each such Registration Statement and in each Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement relates.







Signed:/s/ Peter A. Mock







Peter A. Mock, Ph.D., R.G., P.H.





Paradise Valley, Arizona


August 7, 2009
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2598

To extend and improve the adjustment assistance program for firms under

the Trade Act of 1974.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 1, 1993

Mr. MACHTLEY (for himself, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. WALSH, Mr. MCCLOSKEY, Mr.

GALLO, and Mr. HINCHEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend and improve the adjustment assistance program

for firms under the Trade Act of 1974.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF FIRMS FOR ADJUSTMENT AS4 SISTANCE.

5 Section 251(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

6 2341(c)) is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘within 30 days’’ before ‘‘(in8 cluding any agricultural firm)’’ in the text preceding

9 subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1);
2

•HR 2598 IH

1 (2) by amending subparagraph (B) of para2 graph (1)—

3 (A) by striking out ‘‘absolutely’’ in clause

4 (i), and

5 (B) by inserting ‘‘, or distinct product

6 group,’’ after ‘‘sales or production, or both, of

7 an article’’ in clause (ii); and

8 (3) by amending subparagraph (C) of para9 graph (1) to read as follows:

10 ‘‘(C) imports of articles like or directly competi11 tive with the articles or distinct product group pro12 duced by the firm constitute 25 percent or more of

13 the domestic market for the articles or product

14 group of that kind.’’; and

15 (4) by amending paragraph (2)—

16 (A) by striking out subparagraph (A),

17 (B) by redesignating clause (i) of subpara18 graph (B) as subparagraph (A), and

19 (C) by redesignating clause (ii) of subpara20 graph (B) as subparagraph (B).

21 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

22 Section 256(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

23 2346(c)) is amended to read as follows:

24 ‘‘(b) There are authorized to be appropriated to the

25 Secretary $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1994 and
3

•HR 2598 IH

1 1995 to enable the Secretary to carry out the functions

2 under this chapter in connection with furnishing adjust3 ment assistance to firms (including, but not limited to,

4 the payment of principal, interest, and reasonable costs

5 incident to default on loans guaranteed by the Secretary

6 under the authority of this chapter), which sums are

7 authorized to be appropriated to remain available until

8 expended.’’.

9 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF FIRM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

10 Section 284(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

11 2272 note) is amended—

12 (1) by striking out ‘‘no technical assistance may

13 be provided under chapter 3’’; and

14 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen15 tence: ‘‘No technical assistance may be provided

16 under chapter 3 after September 30, 1995.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory M. Krzemien, the Chief Financial Officer of Mace Security
International, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K, as amended, of Mace Security
International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "December 31, 2003
Form 10-K"), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information contained in the December 31, 2003
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Mace Security International, Inc.

Dated: September 24, 2004

                                                         /s/ Gregory M. Krzemien
                                                         _______________________
                                                         Gregory M. Krzemien

* A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALTAGRACIA N. CASTILLO,

Appellant,

v.

ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC., a foreign profit corporation,

d/b/a DD’S DISCOUNTS,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2444

[February 3, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502018CA014882XXXXMB.

Jorge L. Maxion of Law Offices of Craig Goldenfarb, P.A., West Palm 

Beach, and Andrew A. Harris of Harris Appeals, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, 

for appellant.

Alyssa M. Reiter of Wicker Smith O’Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Ft. 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2771 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2771

To provide military commissary and exchange privileges to the surviving 
     spouses of veterans dying from a service-connected disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1993

Mr. Montgomery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide military commissary and exchange privileges to the surviving 
     spouses of veterans dying from a service-connected disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
Defense shall prescribe such regulations as necessary to provide 
military commissary and exchange privileges to the surviving spouses of 
veterans whose deaths were related to a service-connected disability 
rated less than permanent and total at the time of death on the same 
basis as such privileges are extended to surviving spouses of veterans 
who were permanently and totally disabled due to service-connected 
disability at the time of death.

                                 <all>
```