alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 21, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         Review of Redesignated PMC System.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, Board Room, Bldg. 38, 2E-09, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David J. Lipman, MD, Director, Natl. Ctr. for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20894.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 13, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4460 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Food Safety and
Inspection Service

1400 Independence
Avenue, SW.
Washington, D.C.
20250

USDA
=a

United States Department of Agriculture

MAR 28 2018
Zachary B. Corrigan
Food & Water Watch
1616 P Street, NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20036
RE: FOJA-2018-00213
Hog HIMP

Dear Mr. Corrigan:

This is the first interim response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
request, dated February 23, 2018, to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food
Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). You requested access to a copy of
records regarding Hog HIMP, from 2006 to 2017. We received your request in
our Office on February 23, 2018.

The FSIS FOIA staff works with subject matter experts across the Agency to
locate responsive documents. For this request, we conducted a records search in
the Office of Data Integration and Food Protection, the Office of Public Health
Science, and the Office of Policy and Program Development. FSIS’ search
began on February 26, 2018. Our search includes responsive records in FSIS’
control on that date.

We have processed one Excel spreadsheet and 141 pages that are responsive to
your request. After a thorough review, we have determined that portions of the
pages fall within the exemptions to the FOIA’s mandatory disclosure
requirements, as explained below. In particular, we have determined that
portions of these documents are exempt from disclosure under (b)(4) of the
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended. Accordingly, this request is granted in part.

Some responsive records constitute confidential commercial or financial
information, which is exempt from disclosure under FOIA Exemption 4, 5 U.S.C.
§ 552(b)(4). Disclosure of this information may cause substantial competitive
harm to the person from which this information was obtained. Further, disclosure
of this information would impair the government’s ability to obtain necessary
information in the future.

Please be advised that your FOIA request, including your identity and the
information made available, is releasable to the public under any subsequent
FOIA requests. However, FSIS does not release your personal privacy
information, such as home addresses, telephone numbers, or Social Security
Numbers, all of which are protected from disclosure under FOIA Exemption 6.


Zachary Corrigan
Page 2

FSIS will continue to process records responsive to your request, and will forward them
promptly upon completion of review. As this is not a final response to your FOIA request,
we request that you reserve your right to appeal. We will include your appeal rights in
our final release.

If you have any questions about the way this request is being handled, or about the
USDA’s FOIA regulations, please contact Mark Brook at (202) 690-1787 or via email at
Mark.Brook@fsis.usda.gov

Arianne M. Perkii
Director, Freedom mation Act Staff
Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education
Food Safety and Inspection Service

Enclosure

Be Food Safe: CLEAN: Wash Hands and Surfaces Often SEPARATE: Separate Raw Meats from Other Foods
COOK: Cook To The Right Temperature CHILL: Refrigerate Food Promptly

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
remaining payments and benefits due under this Agreement shall be paid or provided inaccordance with the normal payment dates specified for them herein.     ***(b)***With regard to any provision herein that provides for reimbursement of costs andexpenses or in-kind benefits, except as permitted by Code Section 409A, all such paymentsshall be made on or before the last day of calendar year following the calendar year inwhich the expense occurred.”     2. Confirmation. Except as amended pursuant to this Amendment, the terms of theAgreement shall continue in full force and effect.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first writtenabove.     **AMERISTAR CASINOS, INC.** **EMPLOYEE:**     By: /s/ Gordon R. Kanofsky /s/ Thomas M. Steinbauer       Name: Gordon R. Kanofsky Thomas M. Steinbauer  Title:   Chief Executive Officer and                Vice Chairman  
2
Exhibit 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We have issued our report dated March 2, 2004 (except for note 8, as to
which the date is March 11, 2004), accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Mace Security International, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Mace
Security International, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-87981, filed September
28, 1999, amended December 27, 1999, File No. 333-34096, filed April 5, 2000,
and File No. 333-34536, filed April 11, 2000); Form S-4 (File No. 333-89717,
filed on October 26, 1999, amended December 21, 1999) and Forms S-8 (File No.
333-31757, filed on July 22, 1997, and File No. 333-93311, filed on December 21,
1999).



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
--------------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 2, 2004
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2720

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include peonage and slavery

offenses as RICO predicates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 23, 1993

Mr. KING (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to include peonage

and slavery offenses as RICO predicates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 1961(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended by inserting ‘‘sections 1581–1588 (relating to

5 peonage and slavery),’’ after ‘‘section 1513 (relating to re6 taliating against a witness, victim, or informant),’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone NOBLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6125.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 26, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 23, 2010.

*646Tyrone Noble, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Noble appeals from the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties, and we affirm the denial of Noble’s § 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Noble,*No. 3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9 (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2009). Regarding Noble’s motion for reconsideration, although we affirm the district court’s denial of the motion, we conclude that the district court had no jurisdiction to consider Noble’s motion. *See United States v. Goodwyn, 596*F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3530, 177 L.Ed.2d 1110 (2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Thomas Grant II, certify that: 

1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc.; 

2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors; 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: November 13, 2003
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
W. Thomas Grant II, Chairman of the Board,
#### Luis Enrique GARCIA-PENA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-70165.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 22, 2010.

*104Zachary McCready, Esquire, Law Offices of Thomas K. McKnight, Santa Ana, CA, for Petitioner.

Shahrzad Baghai, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Enrique Garcia-Pena, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. *Barrios v. Holder,*581 F.3d 849, 854 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

We decline to consider the evidence petitioner attached to his opening brief because our review is limited to the administrative record upon which the order of removal is based. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A); *Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Garcia-Pena failed to establish the demands for money and threats from gang members he experienced were on account of a protected ground. *See Barrios,*581 F.3d at 856 (the petitioner failed to establish a political'or ideological opposition to gangs or that the gang imputed any particular belief to him, and evidence supported the conclusion the gang victimized him for economic and personal reasons). Accordingly, because Garcia-Pena failed to demonstrate he was persecuted or fears persecution on account of *105a protected ground, we deny the petition as to his asylum and withholding of removal claims. *See id.; Ochave v. INS,*254 F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir.2001) (“Asylum generally is not available to victims of civil strife, unless they are singled out on account of a protected ground.”).

Garcia-Pena fails to raise any substantive challenge to the denial of his CAT claim. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not addressed in the argument portion of a brief are deemed waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2058

To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect to the distribution

of securities under a plan under chapter 11 of such title.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1993

Mr. BERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect

to the distribution of securities under a plan under chapter 11 of such title.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

4 Section 1143 of title 11, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘If’’, and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(b) Notwithstanding any nonbankruptcy law, if a

9 plan requires the distribution of a security with respect

10 to an allowed claim, then the fair market value of such
2

•HR 2058 IH

1 security shall be conclusively presumed to be equal to the

2 amount of such claim for purposes of any law (other than

3 sections 1124 and 1129) applicable to the debtor or the

4 estate.’’.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

6 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub7 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by section

8 1 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this

9 Act.

10 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend11 ments made by section 1 shall not apply with respect to

12 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code

13 before the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2670

To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to extend indefinitely

the current provisions governing the export of certain domestically produced crude oil.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 1993

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to extend

indefinitely the current provisions governing the export

of certain domestically produced crude oil.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RESTRICTIONS ON OIL

4 EXPORTS.—Section 7(d) of the Export Administration

5 Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2406(d)), as

6 amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

7 ‘‘(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 20 of

8 this Act or any other provision of law, the provisions of

9 this subsection shall remain in effect until expressly re-
2

HR 2670 IH

1 pealed. During all periods in which this subsection is in

2 effect—

3 ‘‘(A) the authorities under this Act may be ex4 ercised in order to carry out this subsection, and

5 ‘‘(B) the provisions of section 11 of this Act

6 shall apply to violations under this subsection.’’.

7 SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 20 of

8 the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50

9 U.S.C. App. 2419), is amended by striking out ‘‘The’’ and

10 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘Except as provided in section

11 7(d)(4) of this Act, the’’.

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take ef13 fect upon the date of enactment.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
GROUP INCORPORATED'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           2,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                       531
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,288
<PP&E>                                          15,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,022
<BONDS>                                          2,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,645
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,272
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,447
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2555 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 82

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2555

                          [Report No. 103-229]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in 
 Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ``Potter Stewart United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 9, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 82
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2555

                          [Report No. 103-229]

 To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in 
 Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ``Potter Stewart United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1993

 Mr. Portman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

                           September 9, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in 
 Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ``Potter Stewart United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in 
Cincinnati, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ``Potter Stewart 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Potter Stewart 
United States Courthouse''.
```