alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We have issued our report dated February 28, 2003, except for note 9 as to
which the date is March 14, 2003, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Mace Security International, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Mace
Security International, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-87981, filed September
28, 1999, amended December 27, 1999, File No. 333-34096, filed April 5, 2000,
and File No. 333-34536, filed April 11, 2000); Form S-4 (File No. 333-89717,
filed on October 26, 1999, amended December 21, 1999) and Forms S-8 (File No.
333-31757, filed on July 22, 1997 and File No. 333-93311, filed on December 21,
1999).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 28, 2003
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2655

To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from carrying out the launch of a

missile as part of a test program in any case in which an unavoidable

or anticipated result of the launch would be the release of debris in

a land area of the United States outside a designated Department

of Defense test range.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15, 1993

Ms. SHEPHERD (for herself, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Ms. FURSE, Mr. MILLER of

California, Mr. VENTO, Mr. BEILENSON, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. CONYERS,

Mr. WAXMAN, and Mr. EDWARDS of California) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from carrying out the

launch of a missile as part of a test program in any

case in which an unavoidable or anticipated result of

the launch would be the release of debris in a land

area of the United States outside a designated Department of Defense test range.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2655 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

2 MISSILE LAUNCHES.

3 (a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not

4 conduct a launch of a missile as part of a test program

5 in any case in which an unavoidable or anticipated result

6 of the launch would be the release of debris in a land area

7 of the United States outside a designated Department of

8 Defense test range.

9 (b) DEFINITION OF DEBRIS.—For purposes of sub10 section (a), the term ‘‘debris’’ does not include particulate

11 matter that is regulated for considerations of air quality.

Æ
#### Peter NWANAKHAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-1455.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 19, 2007.

Decided: March 29, 2007.

Robert L. Oswald, Noto & Oswald, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.

*291Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter Nwanakhan, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.*

Nwanakhan challenges the Board’s finding that his testimony was not credible and that he otherwise failed to meet his burden of proving his eligibility for asylum. We will reverse this decision only if the evidence “was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution,” *Rusu v. INS,*296 F.3d 316, 325 n. 14 (4th Cir.2002) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), and we uphold credibility determinations if they are supported by substantial evidence. *Tewabe v. Gonzales,*446 F.3d 533, 538 (4th Cir.2006).

We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding and the ruling that Nwanakhan failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2006) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (same). Moreover, as Nwanakhan cannot sustain his burden on the asylum claim, he cannot establish his entitlement to withholding of removal. *See Camara v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir.2004) (“Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum — even though the facts that must be proved are the same — an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”).

Accordingly, we deny Nwanakhan’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 Nwanakhan does not challenge the denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture, and therefore, this claim is abandoned. *See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 182, 189 n. 7 (4th Cir.2004) (holding that failure to raise a challenge in an opening brief results in abandonment of that challenge).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                           IWERKS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

                               EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                        
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     For the Three Months Ended                   For the Nine Months Ended
                                               March 31,                                   March 31,
                                       1998                  1997                  1998                   1997
                               -----------------     ------------------    -----------------     --------------------
<S>                            <C>                   <C>                   <C>                   <C>
Denominator for Basic Earnings
 per Share - Weighted average
 shares outstanding                       12,199                 11,918               12,173                   11,756
 
Effect of dilutive securities:
  Options and warrants                         -                    256                    -                      525
                               -----------------     ------------------    -----------------     --------------------
 
Denominator for Diluted
 Earnings per Share                       12,199                 12,174               12,173                   12,281
 
                               =================     ==================    =================     ====================
 
Net income (loss)                        $(5,077)               $   270              $(9,083)                 $   387
                               =================     ==================    =================     ====================
 
Basic and diluted income
 (loss) per share                        $ (0.42)               $  0.02              $ (0.75)                 $  0.03
 
                               =================     ==================    =================     ====================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.3


                   CONSENT OF MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LTD.

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 40-F) of Crystallex International Corporation (the "Company") of
references to and a summary of those sections prepared by us in (i) the
feasibility study completed by us and other independent consultants in
September 2003 entitled "Las Cristinas Project, Feasibility Study, September
2003 (20,000 t/d Feasibility Study)" and (ii) the development plan completed by
us and other independent consultants in August 2005 entitled "Development
Plan--2005, Update to the Feasibility Study Issued September 2003 (Development
Plan)" (collectively, the "Incorporated Information"), included in the Annual
Information Form for the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

         We also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the
Incorporated Information into all of the Company's outstanding registration
statements on Forms F-2, F-3, F-10 and S-8 that have been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

         Dated this 29th day of March, 2007.


                                         MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LTD.

                                         /s/ MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LTD.
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Authorized Signatory
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Chase  Packaging  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ann
W. Green,  Assistant  Secretary and Principal  Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (3) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ann W. Green
                                        Assistant Secretary and
                                        Principal Financial Officer


November 9, 2004


                                                                        Page 13.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2506

To suspend temporarily the duty on photographic gelatin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1993

Mr. QUILLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on photographic gelatin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.35.01 Photographic

gelatin (provided

for in subheading

3503.00.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/94 ’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re9 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse con-
2

•HR 2506 IH

1 sumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the

2 enactment of this Act.

Æ
Order entered September 21, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00703
- CV
JASON MARTINEZ AND HOLLY WOODARD MARTINEZ , Appellant s V. ICAN FINANCIAL, INC. , Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 21
- 09112

O RDER Although directed to file written verification they had paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and cautioned that failure t o comply by September 13, 2021 could result in the appeal being submitted without th at record, appellants have failed to comply

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c). Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See
id.
As the clerk ’s record has been filed, we ORDER appellant’s brief be filed
no later than O c tober 11, 2021.
/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alina LIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-3959.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

*520Submitted March 2, 2007.*

Decided March 12, 2007.

Brian P. Netols, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Martin A. Blumenthal, Northfield, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge, and Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

*

 This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

Order

We affirmed Lis’s conviction but remanded under *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir.2005), so that the district judge could tell us whether the additional discretion provided by *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), would have affected the sentence. *United States v. Feliciano,*No. 02-4193 (7th Cir. June 16, 2005). The district judge’s affirmative answer led to a remand for full resentencing. *United States v. Feliciano,*168 Fed.Appx. 743 (7th Cir.2006).

The range for Lis under the Sentencing Guidelines is 360 months to life in prison. On remand, the district judge resentenced Lis to 240 months, a substantial reduction from the previous sentence of 360 months and 10 years below the bottom of the range.

Lis has filed another appeal to contend that even 240 months is unreasonably high. Lis does not contend, however, that the district judge failed to appreciate any factor that properly influences a sentence after *Booker.*Instead the argument appears to be that the district judge erred in failing to recalculate the range under the Guidelines. That argument is difficult to grasp, as the range had been calculated earlier and was subject to review on the initial appeal. There was no need to start from scratch. The only argument counsel made on this score in the district court is that judges are not entitled to make findings of fact, or add levels, independent of the jury?s verdict. That argument is frivolous. The remedial portion of *Booker*holds that district judges are entitled to make findings provided that the Guidelines are advisory — which *Booker*made them. See *United States v. Reuter,*463 F.3d 792 (7th Cir.2006).

*521A sentence of 240 months is not unreasonably high for Lis’s crime. See *United States v. Bullion,*466 F.3d 574 (7th Cir. 2006).

Affirmed.
# FY19Q1

# FY19Q2

# FY19Q3

# FY19Q4

# AMR - User Notes
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE 

 

Limited English Proficient (LEP) Individual Contact Log 

Date of Contact 

with 

LEP Individual

Personnel Who 

Communicated with LEP 

Individuals

Primary Language 

Spoken by LEP 

 Individual

Geographic 

Location of LEP 

Individual 

(City, State)

Method of Contact 

with LEP Individual 

(Written Translation or 

Oral Interpretation)

Type of Service 

 Provided to 

LEP Individual 

(Written Translation or Oral 

Interpretation)

FSIS Form 1411-4 (10/03/2016)
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report, which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to
substantial doubt with respect to the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern, dated March 25, 2008 relating to the financial statements of Symbollon
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 included in
this Form 10-KSB, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-86704, 333-30467, 333-30359 and 333-80368) and Form SB-2
(File Nos. 333-148787,333-109772, 333-124687,
333-136871, and 333-140200).
 
 
 
 /s/Vitale,
Caturano & Company, Ltd.
 
 VITALE,
CATURANO & COMPANY, LTD.
 
 
 March
31,2008
 Boston,
Massachusetts
# AMR - User Notes

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cvm-gfi-152-evaluating-safety-antimicrobial-new-animal-drugs-regard-their-microbiological-effects

# FY2023Q1

# FY2023Q2

# FY2023Q3
#### Enoch J. WILLIAMS, Appellant v. WASHINGTON CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY, Appellee.

No. 05-7170.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 6, 2007.

Enoch J. Williams, Washington, DC, pro se.

David Bruce Stratton, Deborah Murrell Whelihan, Jordan Coyne & Savits, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

BEFORE: HENDERSON, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs *4filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed as untimely, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed herein this date.

The Clerk of this court is directed to notify the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in writing, of the court’s opinion in this case.

The Clerk is further directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                              CONSENT OF KPMG LLP


Board of Directors
Atlantic Premium Brands, Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-80010 and 333-39561) on Form S-8 of Atlantic Premium Brands, Ltd. of our
report dated March 16, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Atlantic Premium Brands, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December
31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Premium Brands, Ltd.


                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                 ------------------
                                                        KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2457 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2457

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

                                Received

                           November 23, 1993

  Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a salmon captive 
                          broodstock program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Winter Run Chinook Salmon Captive 
Broodstock Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (d), the Secretary of the 
Interior (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ``Secretary'') 
shall conduct in accordance with this section a salmon captive 
broodstock program (hereinafter in this section referred to as the 
``Program'').
    (b) Program.--The program shall be carried out in a manner that is 
consistent with the goals, priorities, and policies set forth in any 
recovery plan for winter run Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River 
developed by the National Marine Fisheries Service under the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, and with findings of consultations regarding that 
population of salmon carried out pursuant to section 7 of that Act.
    (c) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with the Winter Run 
Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Committee (a committee identified in 
the document entitled ``Biological Assessment on the Effects of Coleman 
National Fish Hatchery Operations on Winter Run Chinook Salmon'', 
prepared by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service) in making 
management decisions regarding the Program.
    (d) State Matching.--The Secretary may not implement this section 
unless not less than 20 percent of amounts necessary to conduct the 
Program are provided by non-Federal sources.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to conduct the Program $1,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 20, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```