alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4834]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Review)]

Fresh Garlic From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission determines, 
\2\ pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
fresh garlic from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on December 1, 1999 (64 FR 
67315) and determined on March 3, 2000, that it would conduct a full 
review (65 FR 13989, March 15, 2000). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on August 30, 2000 (65 
FR 52784). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on December 19, 
2000, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Dennis M. Devaney not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on February 21, 2001. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3393 (February 2001), 
entitled Fresh Garlic from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-683 
(Review).

    Issued: February 22, 2001.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4834 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 Illinois State Events
 Section TopicsIllinois HomeCounty OfficesCounty PCP DataDaily LDP RatesProgramsNewslettersState EventsState News ReleasesResources
 State Executive Director Scott Halpin  Read Scott Halpin'
 State Office Address 3500 Wabash Ave.
Springfield, IL62711-8287(217) 241-6600 Ext: 2
(855) 800-1760
 2022 Calendar of Events DateEvent InformationLocation2022 Schedule Forthcoming  Other Dates to Remember
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
EXHIBIT 32.2

I, William R. Benz , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of EnergySolutions, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of EnergySolutions, Inc.

March 31, 2011

By:

/s/ WILLIAM R. BENZ William R. Benz , Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EnergySolutions, Inc. and will be
retained by EnergySolutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Student Handout- Module Number Three (3) - Principles of Food Plant Sanitation 

Principles of Food Plant Sanitation 

The term “sanitation” is often applied to just the cleaning and sanitizing of equipment and 

production areas 

 Sanitation has much broader applications: 

• includes activities designed to prevent product adulteration 

• includes activities designed to minimize spoilage (economic loss) 

• includes activities designed to prevent contamination with materials that may 

offend consumers (aesthetic senses) 

Thermally processed foods are safe and stable because they are given a final heat treatment 

designed to destroy or inactivate microorganisms, The hermetically sealed containers protect 

the foods against microbial recontamination before, during and after the thermal process. 

It is important to remember that the thermal processes are not designed to destroy an infinite 

number of microorganisms. Canning operations must include appropriate steps to minimize the 

number of microorganisms that are present on the food before those foods are placed in the 

container. 

A comprehensive sanitation program is essential for controlling microorganisms in a food 

processing plant. Chlorine and other sanitizing agents are necessary chemicals for this 

purpose. Sanitizers alone cannot ensure food safety. Effective cleaning, proper operating 

procedures and practices, and appropriate controls are all important. 

Numbers and types of microorganisms in a product depend on whether they are: 

• brought into the plant on raw products 

• picked up by the food as it passes through or over equipment or by employee 

contact 

• contributed by water during washing, conveying, or preparation 

• contained in ingredients added to the product 

• in the cooling water for thermally processed containers 

Water used for washing, conveying, and preparing food or for cooling must be of good sanitary 

quality (or rendered so). 

Chlorine compounds are still the most widely used sanitizers in the industry. 

Page 1
The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., U nited States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4060

___________ Dennis Russell, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 28, 1998 Filed: June 1, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dennis Russell appeals from the district court & s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C

. 1 § 1983 action against Willis Sargent, who, during the pertinent time period, was-2-

warden at the Arkansas Department of Correcti on & s Jefferson County Jail/Correctional Facili ty. Mr. Russell alleged he was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment b y being denied medical treatment for his painful arthritis and that Warden Sargent was responsible for this constitutional violation. Following an evidentiary hearing before the magistra te judge, see Johnson v. BiState Justice Ctr. , 12 F.3d 133, 135 (8th Cir. 1993), the district court conducted a de novo review of the record and adopted the magistrate judge & s recommendation that Mr. Russell & s claim against Warden Sargent be dismissed. We conclude the district court & s judgment was correct because Mr. Russell offered no evidence that Warden Sargent was aware by February 1, 1995 (the date of Russell & s complaint) that Rus sell was being denied me dical care or otherwise mistreated. See Choate v. Lockhart , 7 F.3d 1370 , 1376 (8th Cir. 1993) (supervisor may be liable under § 1983 for Eighth Amendmen t violation only when supervisor is p ersonally involved or where supervisor & s corrective inaction amounts to deliberate indifference toward or tacit authorization of violation).
Mr. Russellcomplains that the district court incorrectly stated that he had filed no objections to the magistrate judge & s recommendat ion. Even assuming Mr. Russell & s objec tions were timely, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), we conclude that any error in th e dist rict court & s failure to review them was harmless because the court stated i t conducteda de novo review of the record, including the testimony and exhibits. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1); cf. Sumlin v. United States , 46 F.3d 48, 49 (8th Cir.1995) (per curiam). Finally , we conclude the magistrate did not abuse his discretion in denyin g Russell & s motion for appointment of counsel. See Davis v. Scott , 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.-3-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.2
Cronos Global Income Fund XV
Rule 13a-14 Certifications
     I, John Kallas, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cronos Global Income Fund XV (the“Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of theRegistrant, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and wehave:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 24, 2005   /s/ JOHN KALLAS    John Kallas  Chief Financial Officer of CCC
NEWS   FROM Petroleum
Development Corporation








FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE:  November 13, 2008


CONTACT:Celesta
Miracle - (304) 842-3597 ~ http://www.petd.com





Petroleum
Development Corporation Board of Directors


Announces
New Chairman of the Board





Bridgeport, West Virginia, November
13, 2008:The Board of Directors of Petroleum
Development Corporation (NASDAQ/GMS:PETD) (PDC) today announced that Richard W.
McCullough, Chief Executive Officer, assumed the title of Chairman of the Board
of Directors effective November 11, 2008.





In
December 2007, the Company announced the planned retirement of Steven R.
Williams, then CEO and Chairman.  As part of this planned transition,
Mr. Richard W. McCullough assumed the title of CEO in June 2008. This transfer
of the chairman function to Mr. McCullough completes the
transition.





Mr.
Williams noted: “We believe that combining the CEO and the Chairman titles is
appropriate for a company of our size.  The appointment of Gysle R.
Shellum as our new CFO effective November 11, 2008, as previously announced,
provides Mr. McCullough with the time to assume the chairmanship
duties.”  Mr. Williams remains a member of the Board of
Directors.











About Petroleum Development
Corporation


Petroleum
Development Corporation (www.petd.com) is an independent energy company engaged
in the exploration, production and marketing of natural gas and oil. Its
operations are focused in the Rocky Mountains with additional operations in the
Appalachian and Michigan Basins. PDC is included in the S&P SmallCap 600 and
the Russell 3000 Indexes of Companies.





###











120
Genesis Boulevard • PO Box 26 • Bridgeport, West Virginia •
Phone:  (304) 842-3597
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Chase  Packaging  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Allen
McInnes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Allen McInnes
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


June 29, 2004
PDC Field Tour -Wattenberg
 July 16, 2009





Greeley
 Denver
 Ft. Collins



































Frac Job Layout





Frac Geometry





Separator
 Tank Battery
 Separator Flow Diagram





Plunger Lift System
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2463

To improve consistency in the annual payments made to States from national

forest receipts for the benefit of public schools and public roads.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1993

Mr. LAROCCO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To improve consistency in the annual payments made to

States from national forest receipts for the benefit of

public schools and public roads.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GUARANTEED AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS TO

4 STATES FROM THE NATIONAL FOREST FUND.

5 (a) AMENDMENTS TO ACT OF MAY 23, 1908.—The

6 sixth paragraph under the heading ‘‘FOREST SERVICE’’ in

7 the Act of May 23, 1908 (16 U.S.C. 500), is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘That hereafter twenty-five per

9 centum of all money’’ and inserting ‘‘From all

10 moneys’’;
2

•HR 2463 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘including the year ending June

2 thirtieth, nineteen hundred and eight, shall be paid’’

3 and inserting ‘‘an amount shall be paid’’; and

4 (3) by striking ‘‘said reserve is situated’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘such reserve is situated that is equal to

6 the greater of (1) 25 percent of all moneys received

7 from such reserve during that fiscal year and (2) the

8 average of the amounts paid to the State or Terri9 tory under this paragraph at the end of the five pre10 ceding fiscal years with respect to such reserve’’.

11 (b) AMENDMENTS TO THE WEEKS LAW.—Section 13

12 of the Act of March 1, 1911 (16 U.S.C. 500), is amend13 ed—

14 (1) by striking ‘‘That twenty-five per centum of

15 all moneys’’ and inserting ‘‘From all moneys’’;

16 (2) by striking ‘‘divided shall be paid’’ and in17 serting ‘‘divided, an amount shall be paid’’; and

18 (3) by inserting ‘‘that is equal to the greater of

19 (1) 25 percent of all moneys received from such na20 tional forest during that fiscal year and (2) the aver21 age of the amounts paid to the State under this sec22 tion at the end of the five preceding fiscal years with

23 respect to such national forest’’ after ‘‘situated’’ the

24 first place it appears.
3

•HR 2463 IH

1 (c) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend2 ments made by this section shall apply with respect to pay3 ments to be made to States under the sixth paragraph

4 under the heading ‘‘FOREST SERVICE’’ in the Act of May

5 23, 1908 and under section 13 of the Act of March 1,

6 1911 (16 U.S.C. 500), at the end of fiscal year 1993 and

7 subsequent fiscal years.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  BLC
Financial  Services  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             11,469,000
<SECURITIES>                                       16,794,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                      32,741,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                        1,153,000
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   19,498,000
<PP&E>                                              2,170,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                        882,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     85,896,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               4,539,000
<BONDS>                                             6,486,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              205,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         24,886,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       85,896,000
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   26,366,000
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   14,363,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  3,865,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     8,138,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        2,856,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 5,282,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                        5,282,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.22



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael Y. McGovern, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 13, 2005
    /s/ Michael Y. McGovernMichael Y. McGovernPresident and Chief Executive Officer