alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

------------

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Dateof earliest event reported)  January 10, 2007

Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation

(Exact Name ofRegistrant as Specified in Charter)

              Nevada                                          0-7246                                      95-2636730

(State or OtherJurisdiction                       (Commission                                (IRSEmployer

           ofIncorporation)                                    File Number)                                IdentificationNo.)

120 GenesisBoulevard, Bridgeport, WV    26330

(Address ofPrincipal Executive Offices)

Registrant'stelephone number, including area code    304-842-3597

 

 

103 East MainStreet, Bridgeport, WV 26330

(Former Name orFormer Address, if Changed Since Last Report

Check theappropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneouslysatisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the followingprovisions (*see* General Instruction A.2. below):

[ ] Writtencommunications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Solicitingmaterial pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[ ] Pre-commencementcommunications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.14d-2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencementcommunications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR240.13e-4(c))

                                                                                                

Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets

Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation (NASDAQ GSM: PETD ) completed on January 10, 2007, the purchase ofa majority interest in 44 Company-sponsored partnerships for $57.8 Million. The transaction resulted in an increase in the Company's net interest in 718wells which are currently operated by the Company.  The wells are located inthe Appalachian Basin, Michigan and Colorado.  The purchases were effectedpursuant to Section 1031 of IRC, Like-kind Exchanges.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(a)     Financial Statements of Businesses Acquired.

No financial statements are requiredpursuant to this Item.

(b)     Pro Forma Financial Information.

No pro forma financial statements arerequired pursuant to this Item.

SIGNATURES

                Pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Petroleum Development Corporation

Date:       January 18, 2007

By:           /s/ Richard W. McCullough                                  

                Richard W. McCullough

                ChiefFinancial Officer
8594 Asset Acquisition Statement OMB No. 1545-1021 Form

(Rev. February 2006) Under Section 1060

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Attachment

Sequence No. 61 Attach to your income tax return.

Name as shown on return

Seller

Check the box that identifies you:

1 Name of other party to the transaction Other party’s identifying number

Address (number, street, and room or suite no.)

City or town, state, and ZIP code

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 63768Z Form 8594 (Rev. 2-2006)

Purchaser

Identifying number as shown on return

General Information

2 Date of sale 3 Total sales price (consideration)

Part I

Part II Original Statement of Assets Transferred

4 Assets Aggregate fair market value (actual amount for Class I) Allocation of sales price

Class I $ $

Class II $ $

Class V $ $

Total $

Did the purchaser and seller provide for an allocation of the sales price in the sales contract or in another

written document signed by both parties?

5

Yes No

If “Yes,” are the aggregate fair market values (FMV) listed for each of asset Classes I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and

VII the amounts agreed upon in your sales contract or in a separate written document? Yes No

In the purchase of the group of assets (or stock), did the purchaser also purchase a license or a covenant

not to compete, or enter into a lease agreement, employment contract, management contract, or similar

arrangement with the seller (or managers, directors, owners, or employees of the seller)?

6

Yes No

If “Yes,” attach a schedule that specifies (a) the type of agreement and (b) the maximum amount of

consideration (not including interest) paid or to be paid under the agreement. See instructions.

$

Class IV $ $

Class VI and VII $ $

Class III $ $

See separate instructions.
Form 8594 (Rev. 2-2006) Page 2

Supplemental Statement—Complete only if amending an original statement or previously filed

supplemental statement because of an increase or decrease in consideration. See instructions.

8 Assets Allocation of sales price as previously reported Increase or (decrease) Redetermined allocation of sales price

Class I $ $ $

Class II $ $ $

Class III $ $ $

Total $

Reason(s) for increase or decrease. Attach additional sheets if more space is needed.

7

9

Tax year and tax return form number with which the original Form 8594 and any supplemental statements were filed.

Class VI and VII $ $ $

Class IV $ $ $

Class V $ $ $

Form 8594 (Rev. 2-2006)

$

Part III
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of FFLC Bancorp, Inc. (the

Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,

Stephen T. Kurtz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section

13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: April 29, 2005 |  | By:/s/ Stephen T. Kurtz               
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                     |  | Stephen T. Kurtz, President and

Chief
|                     |  | Executive Officer                     



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the

Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



9



---
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350
 (SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
        United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, John R. Hart, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best
        of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) of the United States
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
        November 6
 ,
        2007
 
 /s/
        John R. Hart
 John
        R.
        Hart
 President
        and Chief Executive
        Officer
[No. 24951-4-III.

Division Three.

August 9, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Sam Leslie Hollingsworth, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 05-1-02987-1, Ellen K. Clark, J., entered January 30, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kulik, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Brown, J.
EXHIBIT 11

                                BOSTON BIOMEDICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                              STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE

                                        WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Quarter Ended June 30,    Six Months Ended June 30,
                                            -----------------------    -------------------------
                                              1997          1996          1997           1996
                                            ---------     ---------    ----------     ----------

<S>                                         <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Average common stock outstanding            4,395,918     2,636,309     4,388,045      2,625,241

Net effect of dilutive common stock
   equivalents-based on treasury stock
   method using average market price          455,705       623,044       443,702        623,044

Issuance of "cheap stock"                        -            4,358           -            4,358
                                            ---------     ---------     ---------      ---------
                                            4,851,623     3,263,711     4,831,747      3,252,643
                                            =========     =========     =========      =========


Net income                                   $175,690      $179,407      $323,448        $82,869
                                            =========     =========     =========      =========

Net income per share                             0.04          0.06          0.07           0.03
                                            =========     =========     =========      =========

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3



                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L.
Pittman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 14, 2003
                                    /s/ Gary L. Pittman
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Gary L. Pittman
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pioneer Companies, Inc. and will be retained by Pioneer Companies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Symbollon Corporation
Framingham, Massachusetts


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-3 of
our report dated February 9, 2001 relating to the financial statements of
Symbollon Corporation (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and for the years then ended, and amounts for the period from
inception (July 15, 1986) to December 31, 2000 (not presented separately
therein) appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2000.




/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

   BDO Seidman, LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 2001
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dark Dynamite Inc (the
      "Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lei,
      Ming, our Chief Executive Officer, certify that:




*
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




*
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                our
                consolidated financial condition and results of
                operations.






/s/
      Lei, Ming


Lei,
      Ming


Director,
      President and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      August 15, 2007




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,910
<SECURITIES>                                     1,876
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      1,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,251
<PP&E>                                               0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,616
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,829
<SALES>                                         49,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           26,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,911
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<FN>
<F1>Disclosure not required on interim financial statements.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

STACY DEMORIS JOHNSON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00332-WO-5; 1:13-cv-00732-

WO-LPA)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacy Demoris Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, 

Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Demoris Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>



THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8957
<PP&E>                                            7996
<DEPRECIATION>                                     279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   26549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7990
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            16
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                7
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<OTHER-SE>                                        7324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     26553
<SALES>                                           3904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3904
<CGS>                                             3070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (581)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.10)


</TABLE>
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service requires 

retail stores that grind raw beef or veal products for sale to keep records showing:

• Name of source products used to produce the raw ground beef or veal products 

• Production dates and any lot numbers of source products

• The producing establishment (EST) number for source 

products for each lot of ground product

• Date and time when each lot of raw ground beef or veal is 

produced in the store

• Date and time when the grinder and other related food-contact 

surfaces (e.g., tables and knives) were cleaned and sanitized

These records must be kept at the retail store for 1 year.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Food Safety and Inspection Service

Are You Keeping Grinding 

Records of Raw Ground Beef or 

Veal Products That You Sell?

Questions? Ask FSIS: Learn More Online:

fsis.usda.gov/contact-us/askfsis fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/

import/Retail-Grinder-Log-Webinar.pdf

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Dec 2022
[No. 34971-0-II.

Division Two.

September 18, 2007.]

#### Sebastian Brown, *Respondent,*v. Toni Eileen Hager, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 05-2-08312-9, Kathryn J. Nelson, J., entered May 19, 2006. *Reversed*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Hunt and Quinn-Brintnall, JJ.