alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD P. FOSTER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SANDRA COLE,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-16676

D.C. No. 2:03-cv-01113-JAMJFM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ronald P. Foster appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50

following a jury trial in Foster’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth

FILED

JAN 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16676

Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

dismiss. 

We are unable to consider Foster’s contentions that the district court erred

by granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, and by allegedly

excluding witness testimony, because Foster failed to provide any portion of the

trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Hall v. Whitley, 935 F.2d 164, 165

(9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam). Furthermore, the district court did not abuse its

discretion by denying without prejudice Foster’s request for production of

transcripts at government expense because Foster did not explain the issues that he

would raise on appeal. See McKinney v. Anderson, 924 F.2d 1500, 1511-12 (9th

Cir. 1991), overruled on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903

(1991) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion and noting that “[p]roduction of the

transcript at government expense for an appellant in forma pauperis in a civil case

is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 753 if a trial judge certifies that the appeal is not

frivolous and presents a substantial question”).

DISMISSED.
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON,
DC 20549





FORM
8-K




CURRENT
REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





November
8, 2008


Date
of report (Date of earliest event reported)











Petroleum
Development Corporation


Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter





Nevada
            0-7246
            95-2636730State
      or Other Jurisdiction
              of
      Incorporation
            Commission
              File
      Number
            IRS
      Employer
              Identification
      Number





120
Genesis Boulevard, Bridgeport, WV  26330


Address
of Principal Executive Offices





304-842-3597


Registrant's
telephone number, including area code





Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing


obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction
A.2. below):





[    
      ]
            Written
      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)[    
      ]
            Soliciting
      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a-12)[    
      ]
            Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14d-2(b))[    
      ]
            Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.13e-4(c))








No
Change


Former
Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report














Item
5.02.              Departure
of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment
of


Certain Officers; Compensatory
Arrangements of Certain Officers





The Board
of Directors of Petroleum Development Corporation announced that Richard W.
McCullough, Petroleum Development Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, assumed
the title of Chairman of the Board of Directors effective November 11,
2008.





The Press
Release is attached herein as Exhibit 99.1








EXHIBIT
INDEX








Item
9.01.                        Financial
Statements and Exhibits.





Exhibit
              No.
            
            Description99.1
            
            PRESS
      RELEASE:
              Petroleum
      Development Corporation Board of Directors Announces New Chairman of the
      Board











SIGNATURES





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.








PETROLEUM
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION





Date:
            November
      13, 2008By:
            /s/
      Richard W. McCulloughRichard
      W. McCulloughCEO
      and President
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131577 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131577 

 COA: 259434 

Van Buren CC: 03-013710-FH 

KENNETH MARTIN JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent supplemental.

# SUMMARY:

On June 22, 2000, The FHWA issued a Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed improvements to US-131 from the Indiana Toll Road to M-60 including a potential western bypass of the Village of Constantine in St. Joseph County, Michigan. The FHWA is issuing this Notice of Intent to expand its original Notice of Intent dated June 22, 2000, to include the area from M-60 to one mile north of Lovers Lane. The revised study termini will be from the Indiana Toll Road to one mile north of Lovers Lane, a distance of approximately 16 miles.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. James Kirschensteiner, Programs and Environmental Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, 315 W. Allegan Street, Lansing, Michigan 48933, Telephone (517) 377-1880, ext. 41 or Mr. Paul Wisney, Manager, Design Division, Michigan Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 30050, Lansing, Michigan 48909, Telephone (517) 335-1905.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FHWA in cooperation with the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), the Indiana Toll Authority and the Indiana Department of Transportation are expanding the northern limit of the US-131 study in St. Joseph County to include the area from M-60 to one mile north of Lovers Lane. This study expansion will permit close examination of traffic congestion and safety issues to determine what improvements can be made to US-131 in the Three River area, including alternative roadways. The US-131 corridor study encompasses approximately 16 miles of US-131 from the Michigan/Indiana state line to the Park/Lockport township line, and includes the village of Constantine and the city of Three Rivers.

Norman R. Stoner,

Assistant Division Administrator, Lansing, Michigan.

[FR Doc. 01-4570  Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven E. Brown, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. Brown Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer August 14, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12567-12568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4687]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION


Fee Rates

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that 
the National Indian Gaming Commission has adopted preliminarily annual 
fee rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.08% (.0008) for tier 2 for calendar 
year 2001. These rates shall apply to all assessable gross revenues 
from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction of the Commission. If 
a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation under 25 CFR part 518, the 
preliminary fee rate on class II revenues for calendar year 2001 shall 
be one-half of the annual fee rate, which is 0.4% (.0004).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobby Gordon, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; 
telephone 202/632-7003; fax 202/632-7066 (these are not toll-free 
numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act established 
the National Indian Gaming Commission which is charged with, among 
other things, regulating gaming on Indian lands.
    The regulations of the Commission (25 CFR part 514 and 25 CFR part 
518), as amended, provide for a system of fee assessment and payment 
that is self-administered by gaming operations. Pursuant to those 
regulations, the Commission is required to adopt and communicate 
assessment rates; the gaming operations are required to apply those 
rates to their revenues, compute the fees to be paid, report the 
revenues, and remit the fees to the Commission on a quarterly basis.
    The regulations of the Commission and the preliminary annual rate 
being adopted today are effective for calendar year 2001. Therefore, 
all gaming operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission are 
required to self-administer the provisions of these regulations and 
report and pay any fees

[[Page 12568]]

that are due to the Commission by March 31, 2001.

Richard Schiff,
Acting Chief of Staff, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-4687 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30296 Summary Calendar

KEVIN STERLING,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT; RYAN ZINKE, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:17

- CV

- 742

Before WIENER, HAYNES, AND COSTA , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff

- Appellant Kevin Sterling , an African

- American employee of the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (“BSEE”) within the U nited States Department of the Interior (“DOI”) , alleged that (1) he was denied a timely reclassification to a higher

- paying position because of his race and (2) he suffere d retaliation in the form of an increased workload, a further delay in

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 19, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30296 Document: 00515204375 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2019No. 19

- 30296

2 his reclassification, and a failure to receive back

- pay because he filed an EEO complaint. Defendants

- Appellees, the BSEE , the DOI , and Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the DOI , filed a Motion to Dismiss and/or Alternatively for Summary Judgment , seeking dismissal of Sterling’s claims. The district court
issued a thirty

- nine page opinion, thoroughly considering the factual allegations and the law applicable to each of Sterling’s claims , and concluded that Sterling had failed to establish a prima facie case of either employment discrimination or retaliation and dismissed his claims with prejudice. 1 Sterling timely filed a notice of appeal. We have conducted a de novo review of the record on appeal , including the briefs of the parties and the exhaustive order and reasons of the district
court , and, l ike the district court before us, we are convinced that Sterling failed to establish a prima facie case of either employment discrimination or retaliation. The district court’s decision to grant the Defendant s
- Appell ee ’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Alternatively for Summary Judgment was correct in light of the alleged facts and applicable law. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

1 The district court also dismissed Sterling’s state law employme nt discrimination claim and his claims against improper Defendants. Sterling does not appeal th o se aspects of the district court’s decision. Case: 19-30296 Document: 00515204375 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2019
##### 



EXHIBIT 24.1 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of the undersigned officers and
directors of CSX Trade Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which
is to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., a
Form 10-K (Annual Report) on behalf of the CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust
(issuer in respect of the CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust 6.00% Trade
Receivables Participation Certificates, Series 1998-1), hereby constitutes and
appoints Ellen M. Fitzsimmons and Gordon F. Bailey his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead to sign
said Form 10-K, and any and all amendments thereto, with power where
appropriate to affix the corporate seal of CSX Trade Receivables Corporation
thereto and to attest said seal, and to file said Form 10-K, and any and all
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, hereby granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power
and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this
22nd day of March, 2004.  /s/ DAVID H. BAGGS
David H. Baggs/s/ DAVID A. BOOR
David A. Boor/s/ ALLEN C. GOOLSBY, III
Allen C. Goolsby, III/s/ LESLIE A. GRANDIS
Leslie A. Grandis
#### Jan HAMILTON, Chapter 13 Trustee, petitioner, v. Stephanie Kay LANNING.

No. 08-998.

June 15, 2009.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Wednesday, January 10, 2001. 

# Place:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street entrance between 20th and 2lst Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551 

# Status:

Open 

# Matters to be Considered:

  

## Discussion Agenda 

1. Consideration of a final rule under Regulation Y (Bank Holding Companies and Change in Bank Control) to implement provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act governing merchant banking investments made by financial holding companies (Docket No. R-1065). This rule revises and replaces an interim rule published for comment last year. 

2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Note:

This meeting will be recorded for the benefit of those unable to attend. Cassettes will be available for listening in the Board's Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for $6 per cassette by calling 202-452-3684 or by writing to: Freedom of Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

You may call 202-452-3206 for a recorded announcement of this meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement. (The Web site also includes procedural and other information about the open meeting.) 

Dated: January 3, 2001. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-501 Filed 1-4-01; 11:05 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Arthur Lee GOODEN, II, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Commonwealth of Virginia; Barack Hussein Obama; Tonya R. Henderson-Stith; Christopher W. Hutton; Bonnie L. Jones; Timothy Fisher; Vincent H. Conway; Albert Patrick; Gary Mills; Bryant Sugg; Richard Kurns; Alfred Masters; Pamela *243Jones; William H. Shaw; Peter Trench; Mathews; Nelson T. Overton; Jane & John Does, 1-100; Jane & John Does, A-Z (all officers of the Commonwealth of Virginia); Jane or John Does, A-Z (all officers of the United States); Jane Does I-X, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-2483.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 24, 2014.

Decided: April 28, 2014.

Arthur Lee Gooden, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Gooden, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint entitled “criminal complaint for: genocide, civil rights offenses resulting in death, human trafficking, and treason.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gooden v. United States,*No. 4:13-cv-00126-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 8 *&*entered Oct. 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
MEDIATION REFERRALS

2009-1706.

#### State ex rel. La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries v. Thomas.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-827, 2009-Ohio-4946.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6XE):
2009-1319.

#### JJAM Mgt., Inc. v. Lloyd’s.

Cuyahoga App. No. 93010.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130903) of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-21173) of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-38219), as amended, of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-57855), as amended, of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-68209), as amended, of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-48380), as amended, of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-64262), as amended, of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-91090) of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-113531), as amended, of Hollywood Media Corp.  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124559) pertaining to the Hollywood Media Corp. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan  **•** Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-14659) and (Form S-8 No. 333-45098) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan,as amended, and Directors Stock Option Plan, respectively;  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62152) pertaining to the Hollywood Media Corp. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan,401(k) Plan and the Director’s Stock Option Plan  **•** Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114176) pertaining to the Hollywood Media Corp. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, asamended October 30, 2003, and the Hollywood Media Corp. Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended May 1, 2003;of our report dated March 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofHollywood Media Corp. as of December 31, 2004, and for each of the two years in the period endedDecember 31, 2004, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.              /s/Ernst & Young LLP   Certified Public Accountants      Fort Lauderdale, Florida