alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry CHESTER, a/k/a Zeke, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7589.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 28, 2011.

Henry Chester, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Chester appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (2006). Initially, the district court noted that § 3742(a) provides no authority for it to reduce a term of imprisonment. The district court went on to hold that, even if Chester’s motion had been brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), he would not be entitled to relief. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Chester sought relief under Amendment 674 to the *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(“USSG”). Under § 3582(c)(2), a district court may modify the term of imprisonment “of a defendant who has been sentenced ... based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered,” if the amendment is listed in the Guidelines as retroactively applicable. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Chester was sentenced in 1995. Amendment 674 did not become effective until November 1, 2004, and does not apply retroactively. *See*USSG Supp. *718App. C, Amend. 674 (2010); USSG § lB1.10(c), p.s. (2010).

Because Chester clearly is not entitled to a reduction based on Amendment 674, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Form 8915 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Qualified Hurricane Retirement 

Plan Distributions and Repayments

© Attach to Form 1040, Form 1040A, or Form 1040NR.

OMB No. 1545-0074

2009

Attachment 

Sequence No. 156

Name. If married, file a separate form for each spouse required to file Form 8915. See instructions. Your social security number

Fill in Your Address Only 

If You are Filing This 

Form by Itself and Not 

With Your Tax Return

© Home address (number and street, or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to your home) Apt. no.

City, town or post office, state, and ZIP code

Part I Qualified Hurricane Distributions From Retirement Plans (other than IRAs)

1 Enter the amount, if any, from your 2008 Form 8915, line 6 . . . . 1

 2 Enter the amount, if any, from your 2008 Form 8915, line 1 . . . . 2

3 Subtract line 2 from line 1. If zero or less, enter -0- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

4 Enter the total amount of any repayments you made in 2009. But do not include repayments made 

on or before the due date (including extensions) for filing your 2008 tax return. See 

instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5 Add lines 3 and 4. This amount can be carried back to reduce the amount subject to tax in a prior 

year. See instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Part II Qualified Hurricane Distributions From Traditional, SEP, SIMPLE, and Roth IRAs

6 Enter the amount, if any, from your 2008 Form 8915, line 13 . . . . 6 

7 Enter the amount, if any, from your 2008 Form 8915, line 8 . . . . 7 

8 Subtract line 7 from line 6. If zero or less, enter -0- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

9 Enter the total amount of any repayments you made in 2009. But do not include repayments made 

on or before the due date (including extensions) for filing your 2008 tax return. See 

instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

10 Add lines 8 and 9. This amount can be carried back to reduce the amount subject to tax in a prior 

year. See instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

Sign Here Only If You 

Are Filing This Form 

by Itself and Not With 

Your Tax Return

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this form, including accompanying attachments, and to the best of my 

knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete. Declaration of preparer (other than taxpayer) is based on all information of which 

preparer has any knowledge.

© Your signature © Date

Paid 

Preparer’s 

Use Only 

Preparer’s 

signature © Date

Check if selfemployed ©

Preparer's SSN or PTIN

Firm's name (or yours 

if self-employed), 

address, and ZIP code © EIN ©

Phone no. 

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see instructions. Cat. No. 37726T Form 8915 (2009)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00341-CR

Israel Ytuarte RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR2310

Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

This court’s opinion and judgment dated October 2, 2013 are WITHDRAWN. The State’s 

motion for rehearing is DENIED. In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment 

of the trial court is REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions 

for the State to reoffer a ten-year plea bargain to Appellant and for further proceedings consistent

with this opinion. 

SIGNED February 5, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-43988; File No. SR-NASD-00-37]

                    On June 19, 2000, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”), through its subsidiary the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) a proposed rule change, pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          to seek permanent approval of the Nasdaq Application of the OptiMark System without any restrictions on the trading activity to be conducted through the facility. Notice of the proposed rule change was published on August 9, 2000, in the                     **Federal Register**                    , to solicit comment from                           ( print page 12578)                        interested persons.[3]                                          On February 12, 2001, the Nasdaq withdrew the proposed rule change.[4] 

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[5] 

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43107 (Aug. 2, 2000), 65 FR 48771.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                                     *See*                         letter from Peter R. Geraghty, Assistant General Counsel, Nasdaq, to John Polise, Senior Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated February 12, 2001.                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 01-4750 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10142 USDC No. 6:04-CR-40-ALL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESSE RAY WESTBROOK, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

-------------------- O R D E R: Jesse Ray Westbrook pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to manufacture cocaine base. Westbrook’s plea agreement contained a waiver-of-appeal provision. Appointed counsel for Westbrook has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). If, on appeal, the Government does not seek to enforce an appeal waiver, the waiver is not binding. United States v. Story , 439 F.3d 226, 231 (5th Cir. 2006). However, in this case the Government has not had an opportunity to address Westbrook’s appellate waiver.O R D E R No. 05-10142 -2- “[I]t is defense counsel’s obligation to ascertain and certify that the Government would rely on the defendant’s appellate waiver before moving to withdraw.” United States v. Acquaye , ___ F.3d ___, 2006 WL 1549951 at *2 (5th Cir. June 8, 2006). Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal. Westbrook’s counsel is directed to file a new Anders brief stating the Government’s position with respect to the waiver or a brief on the merits of this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. See id.

/s/ W. Eugene Davis W. EUGENE DAVIS UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
#### Yvonne A’Rae LAISURE-RADKE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Radke, deceased; Estate of Douglas Radke, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant, and Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc.; Dr. Reddy’S Laboratories Inc.; Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. *33Yvonne A’Rae Laisure-Radke, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Radke, deceased; Estate of Douglas Radke, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc.; Dr. Reddy’S Laboratories Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 07-35443, 07-35495.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Withdrawn from Submission Nov. 20, 2008.

Resubmitted and Filed Feb. 20, 2009.

Karen Kathryn Koehler, Esquire, Strit-matter Kessler Whelan Withey & Coluccio, Seattle, WA, Fred H. Shepherd, Esquire, Arnold Anderson Vickery, Esquire, Paul F. Waldner, Esquire, Vickery Waldner & Mallia, LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

John R. Ipsaro, Esquire, Jeffrey R. Schaefer, Esquire, Mary Lynn Tate, Esquire, Joseph Thomas, Esquire, Ulmer & Berne, Cincinnati, OH, Jeffrey Royal Johnson, Carin A. Marney, Esquire, Williams Kastner & Gibbs, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: B. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Y’vonne A’Rae Laisure-Radke appeals the district court’s order granting Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc.’s, and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss. The district court held that judicial estoppel barred *34Laisure-Radke from asserting her claims against Defendants. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s application of judicial estoppel for an abuse of discretion. *Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.,*270 F.3d 778, 782 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.

Because Laisure-Radke failed to disclose the existence of her claims against Defendants in her bankruptcy petition and obtained a discharge of her debts based on this failure to disclose, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded that judicial estoppel barred Lai-sure-Radke’s claims. *See id.*at 784-85. That Laisure-Radke later moved to reopen her bankruptcy proceedings does not excuse her earlier failure to disclose; judicial estoppel ensures that debtors make a “full and honest disclosure” of their assets in the original bankruptcy proceeding. *See id.*at 785 (internal quotation omitted).

Because we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Laisure-Radke’s claims, we do not reach the issues raised in Defendants’ cross-appeal.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00436-CR

Devaughn Dejon Bryant

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1201128D)

January 24, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
2

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00436-CR

DEVAUGHN DEJON BRYANT APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Devaughn Dejon Bryant pled guilty to two counts of aggravated 

robbery with a deadly weapon. The jury convicted him and assessed his 

punishment at sixty years’ confinement on each count. The trial court sentenced 

Appellant accordingly, ordering that the sentences run concurrently, and found that 

he had used or exhibited a deadly weapon in the two robberies.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
3

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel 

and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that, in his 

professional opinion, these appeals are frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet 

the requirements of Anders v. California2by presenting a professional evaluation of 

the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.3 Appellant 

filed a pro se response to the Anders brief; the State declined to file a brief.

After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the 

ground that an appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court 

is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if there is 

any arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf.4 Only then may we grant 

counsel’s motion to withdraw.5

Because Appellant entered an open plea of guilty, our independent review for 

potential error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of his 

plea, error that is not independent of and supports the judgment of guilt, and error 

occurring after entry of the guilty plea.6

 

2

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510–11 & n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

4See id. at 511.

5See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

6See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 619–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003), Young 

v. State, 8 S.W.3d 656, 666–67 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
4

We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the appellate record. We 

agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find 

nothing in the appellate record that arguably might support this appeal.7 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 24, 2013

 

7See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
EX-10.5





 Exhibit 10.5 
  

 
 



 
 June 23, 2016 
 Vijay
Manthripragada 
 Chief Executive Officer 
 Re: Executive
Compensation Package 
 Dear Vijay: 
 The board of
directors (the “Board”) of Montrose Environmental Group, Inc (the “Company”) has approved an executive compensation package for you which is summarized herein. In addition to company benefit plans offered to you from time to time
by the Company, you shall be eligible for the following compensation package: 
 Base Compensation: $300,000 per year 

Cash Bonus Program: The cash bonus program you are eligible for has been separately approved by the Board and all payments thereunder remain subject to
Board approval. 
 IPO/Change in Control Cash Bonus Amount: $2,000,000 shall be payable to you in cash upon the occurrence of a change in control or
effectiveness of an Initial Public Offering of the Company. A change in control shall be defined as set forth in the Company’s equity incentive plan. 

Equity Incentive Award: You will be granted 25,045 new options under the Company’s equity incentive program, which shall be updated upon approval
by the Board and requisite shareholders to increase the number of options available for grant. The options shall vest over a four year period, with 50% vesting at the second anniversary of the vesting start date and the remaining 50% vesting at the
fourth anniversary of the vesting start date. The vesting start date shall be the vesting start date of options you received in 2015. The options shall fully accelerate upon a change in control of the Company (not including an Initial Public
Offering) as set forth in the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 2013 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan. All options previously granted to you in 2015 shall be cancelled. 

Severance Upon Termination Without Cause Following a Change in Control: If you are terminated without cause or terminate your employment for good
reason within twelve (12) months following a change in control of the Company, you shall be entitled to receive severance in the amount of one year of your then-current base salary, which may be payable in lump sum or as continued compensation
during the 12 month severance period, as determined by the Company. 
 We look forward to your continued success with Montrose. 

Regards, 
 /s/ Richard Perlman 

Richard Perlman 
 Chairman of the Board 

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 
  

							
	 Global Headquarters

1 Park Plaza
 Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92614
	  	 T: 949.988.3500
 F: 949.988.3514

info@montrose-env.com
 www.montrose-env.com
城区县级委员会选举

城区县级委员会委员的投票和任职资格

概述

美国农业部一直在增强对处于全美

各地的城市内的生产者的服务, 包

括通过农业服务局 (FSA) 所属县级

委员会 (COC) 所提供的服务,这

些委员会是对于 FSA 的日常运作

至关重要的实体,它们让草根阶层

能够给与投入、让地方能够对联邦

农场项目进行管理。 

可在 fsa.usda.gov/elections 上找

到设有“城区县级委员会(urban 

county committees)”的区域的

列表。

美国农业部(USDA)鼓励所有符

合资格的生产者和 城区种植者为

县级委员会选举进行投票,或竞选

该委员会的职位,包括初创或成熟

的生产者、传统上得不到充分服务

的生产者(即少数民族和妇女生产

者),或大小企业。

城区农业

城区农业包括在城区和郊区培植、加工和

销售农产品。社区菜园、屋顶农场、水

培、气培和水箱设施、垂直生产以及其他

创新做法,都是城区农业的范例。部落社

区和小城镇也可包括在内。城区农业业主

和园丁在不同人群中开展工作,为他们扩

大获得富含营养食品的途径、促进社区参

与、提供就业机会、对社区进行农业教育

并扩大绿色空间。

项目如何运行

城区生产者委员会委员由划定的地方行政区

(LAA)内的城区生产者选举产生,任期 3

年。FSA 县级委员会将每季度至少召开一次

会议,通过以下方式来帮助自然资源保护服

务局 (NRCS) 和 FSA 项目确定不断增长的城

区农业市场的需求: 

•

•

开展外展活动,并与当地 利益攸关方建

立合作关系。

•

•

谁有资格投票?

请联系您当地的 FSA 办事处,以确认您是

否拥有资格。在选举中,您的投票资格必

须先得到认证,您投出的选票才能被计入

总票数当中。一般资格要求包括: 

1. 拟投票人须达到法定投票年龄;如果拟投

票人未达到法定投票年龄,则其需要是负

责对整个农场的农业生产进行监督和管理

的负责人。

2. 拟投票人须用以下身份进行 某种农业商品

的生产或销售:

• 符合以下一个或多个条件的个体:

– 有资格并有能力在选举中自主地进行

投票。

– 是某个普通合伙企业的合伙人。

– 是某个合资企业的成员。

• 是某个合法实体的授权代表,合法实体

的例子有:

– 公司、遗产、信托、有限合伙公司、

非营利或其他商业企业(不包括普通

合伙和合资企业)。

– 州政府、州政府的政治分支机构,或

任何州属机构。

只有指定的代表才能代表该实体进行

投票。

3. 参与依法设立的任何 USDA 项目或与之开

展合作。

请注意:“合作生产者”是指已经提供其

在城区所经营的机构的信息的人(即使他

们未曾申请或获得过美国农业部的项目补

助)。

请联系您当地的 FSA 办事处,以对城区种

植者、选民的身份进行登记,或要求被视

为 COC 选举的符合资格的提名人。

2023 年 8 月

确定城区农业社区的需求,协助美国农

业部确定潜在的项目改进措施(包括立

法、监管、行政方面)。

为未来的种植者提出量身定制的项目机

会建议。

理解并推广现有的美国农业部项目。

向城区生产者和当地利益相关者提供关

于美国农业部项目和关于FSA委员会的

教育。

审查生产者的申请书,协助进行行政层

面和项目层面的监督。

•

•
关于实行“夫妻共同财产制”的州的配偶投

票资格的解释 

在实行“夫妻共同财产制”的州,符合资格

的选民的配偶也有资格投票。

地方行政区(LAA)

一个 FSA 县级委员会所服务的由单个县或多

个县所组成的辖区被划分为 3 至 11 个 

LAA。每个 LAA 在 FSA 县级委员会中都有一

名代表。一个人只能在一个 LAA 投票(该人

在其中参与或合作参与 FSA 项目或由 FSA 

管理的项目的 LAA)。城区参与者必须在单

个县或多个县的边界内拥有经营权益。

个人可通过使用 fsa.usda.gov/elections 网

站上的县级委员会选举地理信息系统定位工

具,来确定自己或自己的农业经营权益位于

哪个 LAA。 

在同一个县或地区中的多重农业经营权益 

在同一个由单个县或多个县所组成的辖区内

的多个 LAA 的不同农场参与或合作参与美国

农业部项目的符合资格的选民只能投出一张

选票,且仅有资格在其中的一个 LAA 任职。

在一个以上 LAA 拥有农业经营权益的投票人

仅有进行一次投票的资格,并将被分配到最

靠近其居住地的 LAA。居住在划定边界之外

的城区生产者,可根据要求选择他们在其中

拥有农业经营权益的任何一个 LAA。 

谁可以担任公职?

要担任 FSA 的县级委员会的委员,必须满

足下述各项基本资格要求:

1. 是美国公民;

2. 是拥有由某个城区 COC 管辖区管理的

记录的城区生产者;

3. 在展开选举的 LAA 居住,或在其中拥

有农业经营权益。*

* 如果候选人在其居住的 LAA 内没有农业

经营权益,他们可能会被分配到其农业经

营权益所在地的LAA。

4. 个人必须 :

• 不曾:

— 被FSA 县级委员会除名或取消委

员或候补委员资格,或

— 被从 FSA 就业岗位除名或取消资

格。

• 不曾因故被免去任何公职,或被判

犯有欺诈、盗窃、贪污或任何其他

重罪。

• 不曾因不光彩的理由从任何军种退

伍。

在选举期间,未收到邮寄来的选票的个人

可直接从其所在的 FSA 县办事处领取选

票。选票必须在选举截止日期或之前投

出。

禁止歧视

美国农业部禁止在其所有项目和活动中因为

种族、肤色、民族血统、年龄、残疾而歧视

任何人; 在适用的情况下,不得基于性别、

婚姻状况、家庭状况、父母状况、宗教、性

取向、遗传信息、政治信仰、报复而歧视任

何人;也不得因为 某人的个人收入来部分地

或全部地来自任何公共援助项目而对其实施

歧视。

可用的 FSA 和 NRCS 项目 

FSA ‒ 无保险农作物灾害援助项目、有机认

证成本分担项目、小额贷款和农场储藏设施

贷款。

NRCS ‒ 提供水土保护方面的资金和技术援

助,包括高隧道、土壤健康和灌溉。

有关城区农业业主可用项目的更多信息,请

访问 farmers. gov/urban。

更多信息

这份资料单仅供参考,可能会有其他限制。

关于 FSA 县级委员会的项目详情或其他信

息,请访问 当地的 USDA 服务中心,或浏览 

FSA 县级委员会网站 fsa.usda.gov/

elections。

随时

联系您当地的 FSA 

办事处,了解 

如何参与。

美国农业部是一个机会均等的提供者、雇主和贷款人。 fsa.usda.gov

六月

中旬 六月前 8 

月初

12 

月初

1 月 

1 日

登记成为符合

资格的选民。

提名期开始。

表格可从 

fsa.usda.gov/

elections 上下载。

向当地 FSA 县办事

处提交提名表的最

后一天。

向符合资格的选

民寄出选票。

将已完成的选票交

回当地 FSA 县办事

处的最后一天。

新当选的县级委

员会委员就职。

11 

月初
Instructions for Opening Comma Separated Values (CSV) Files

from the FSIS Website in Common Spreadsheet Software

Download the data file from the FSIS Website to any directory on the device.

In Microsoft Excel1:

As of Microsoft Excel Version 2304 on Microsoft Windows

1. Create a new Blank workbook (This can be done by going to the File > New and 

selecting Blank Workbook).

2. On the Data tab, in the Get & Transform Data group, select From Text/CSV.

3. Navigate to the file that was downloaded from the FSIS Website and select 

Open.

4. In the preview dialog box, ensure the file Delimitator is set to Comma.

5. Select Load to open the dataset.

In LibreOffice Calc2:

As of Version 7.5.4

1. Go to File>Open

2. Ensure that you are looking at All Files and navigate to the file that was 

downloaded from the FSIS Website. Select Open.

3. In the Text Import dialog box, select Comma under Separator Options and 

unselect the other separators. Select OK to close the dialog box and load the 

data.

4. To filter the data, go to the Data menu, and select AutoFilter.

In Google Sheets3:

As of July 5, 2023

1. Upload the dataset that was was downloaded from the FSIS Website onto 

Google Drive

2. Go to File > Import.

3. Select the Import Location as Create new spreadsheet and Separator type as 

Comma.

4. Select Import Data

5. To filter data, go to the Data > Create a filter.

1 https://support.microsoft.com/en-au/office/import-or-export-text-txt-or-csv-files-5250ac4c-663c47ce-937b-339e391393ba#ID0EBBN=Office_2010_-_Office_2016

2 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Faq/Calc/001

3

https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6000292?hl=en&co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid&sjid=13425869554

209612308-NA