alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 34842-0-II.

Division Two.

September 18, 2007.]

#### Trinity Land Development, LLC, *Respondent,*v. Sunrise Development Corporation of Washington, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 04-2-11427-1, Bryan E. Chushcoff, J., entered May 5, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ChasePackaging Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuantto Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

| August 13,  2008 | /s/ Allen T.  McInnes                           |   |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                  | Allen T. McInnes                                |
|                  | Chairman of the  Board, President and Treasurer |
|                  | (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |

 

----
2009-2208.

#### State v. Davis.

Cuyahoga App. No. 91324, 2009-Ohio-5217. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0381

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JORDAN KYLE KEEFE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 8 2023

03/08/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0381
**Exhibit 23****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-34313,333-33860, 333-56612, 333-88270, 333-108867, 333-120516 and 333-132499) of Ameristar Casinos, Inc.pertaining to the 2002 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Election Plan, the Amended and RestatedManagement Stock Incentive Plan,  the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and theDeferred Compensation Plan of Ameristar Casinos, Inc. of our reportsdated February 28, 2008, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of AmeristarCasinos, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Ameristar Casinos, Inc.,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLPLas Vegas, Nevada
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2774 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2774

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require recipients of Federal 
 financial assistance to take affirmative action in the employment of 
  qualified special disabled veterans and veterans of the Vietnam era.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 1993

 Mr. Montgomery (by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to require recipients of Federal 
 financial assistance to take affirmative action in the employment of 
  qualified special disabled veterans and veterans of the Vietnam era.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 4212(a) of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, and any recipient of Federal financial 
        assistance,'' after ``United States,''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or the recipient of Federal financial 
        assistance'' after ``party contracting with the United 
        States''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                              PHOTONICS CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bryce Knight, certify that:

1.   I am the chief executive officer of Photonics Corporation
2.   Attached  to this  certification  is Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended
     December 31, 2005, a periodic  report (the "periodic  report") filed by the
     issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the  Securities  and  Exchange Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act"),
     which contains financial statements.
3    I hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
          o    The periodic  report  containing the financial  statements  fully
               complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Exchange Act, and
          o    The  information in the periodic report fairly  presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the issuer for the periods presented.

March 29, 2006                                                /s/ Bryce Knight
                                                             -------------------
                                                             Bryce Knight
                                                             President and Chief
                                                             Executive Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  Company and will be  retained  by  Photonics  Corporation  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This  certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document  with which it is submitted to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

583 KA 15-00533 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BERNARD ROBERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered February 24, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256). Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was a “general unrestricted waiver” that encompasses his contention that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh and severe ( People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737; see Lopez , 6 NY3d at 255-256; cf. People v Maracle , 19 NY3d 925, 928).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
NUMBER 13-20-00369-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

HV, LLC D/B/A CIRCO HERMANOS 

VASQUEZ, AURORA 

ENTERTAINMENT MARKETING, LLC, 

RAMON VASQUEZ, JOSE VASQUEZ, 

ALDO VASQUEZ, JESUS VASQUEZ 

GUILLERMO 'MEMO' VASQUEZ, Appellants,

v.

RACIEL JUAREZ, 

S2DIO HVAC, LLC, AND 

CARRIGAN & ANDERSON, PLLC, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
2

This cause is before the Court on appellants’ amended motion to dismiss.

Appellants assert the underlying trial court has not disposed of all pending parties and 

claims.

In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review 

final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by statute. Lehmann v. HarCon Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there is no final judgment or order 

subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).

Accordingly, the amended motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Delivered and filed the

7th day of January, 2021.
[No. 58738-2-I.

Division One.

October 1, 2007.]

#### Omar Lee et al., *Appellants,*v. Daniel Curtis Shane et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-2-30865-6, Andrea A. Darvis, J., entered August 11, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Appelwick, C.J., concurred in by Grosse and Baker, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-381, MM Docket No. 99-268, RM-9691] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission, at the request of Sarkes Tarzian, Inc., licensee of station WRCB-TV, NTSC channel 3, substitutes DTV channel 13 for DTV channel 55 at Chattanooga, Tennessee.                               ( print page 11118)    *See*64 FR 45500, August 20, 1999. DTV channel 13 can be allotted to Chattanooga in compliance with the principal community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference coordinates (35-09-40 N. and 85-18-52 W.) with a power of 37.0, HAAT of 325 meters and with a DTV service population of 915 thousand.                     

With this action, this proceeding is terminated. 

# DATES:

Effective April 2, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-268, adopted February 15, 2001, and released February 16, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Television
      - Digital television broadcasting

Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# 47 CFR PART 73—[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.622

2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments under Tennessee, is amended by removing DTV channel 55 and adding DTV channel 13 at Chattanooga. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Barbara A. Kreisman,

Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 01-4326 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
2009-1484.

#### Whitley v. River’s Bend Health Care.

Lawrence App. No. 08CA30, 2009-Ohio-3366. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.

O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
[No. 34064-0-II.

Division Two.

August 21, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Woo Jung Yun, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 05-1-00879-6, Gary Tabor, J., entered November 23, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
Order issued July 2, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00905-CR 

No. 05-14-00906-CR 

DONTE LAMONT ROSE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F-1325715-U and F-1325716-U 

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Brown, and Justice Stoddart 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the motion of Julie Woods for 

leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to 

remove Julie Woods as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to 

send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to Donte Lamont Rose, No. 01942614, 

Middleton Transfer Facility, 13055 FM 3522, Abilene, Texas 79601. 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 00N-1501]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Threshold of Regulation for Substances Used in Food-Contact Articles” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of December 26, 2000 (65 FR 81530), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0298.  The approval expires on February 29, 2004.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: February 23, 2001.

William K. Hubbard,

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.

[FR Doc. 01-5017 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2000 and the related Consolidated
Statements of Income and Cash Flows for the Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                    3,235
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            41,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                246
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         46,655
<PP&E>                                    9,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          115,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    31,822
<BONDS>                                  48,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                     56
<OTHER-SE>                               33,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            115,957
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        160,909
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           105,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         43,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        5,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           5,971
<INCOME-TAX>                              2,667
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       3,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              3,304
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.65


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Gart Sports Company:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 of Gart Sports Company of our report dated March 14, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of Gart Sports Company and subsidiaries as of
January 29, 2000 and January 30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows
for the 52 weeks ended January 29, 2000 and January 30, 1999, the 28 days ended
January 31, 1998, and the 52 weeks ended January 3, 1998, which report appears
in the January 29, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Gart Sports Company.


KPMG LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 18, 2000
### M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda, Appellant

V.

Aspri Investments, LLC, Appellee

No. 04

- 15

- 00340

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2015

- CI

- 01910

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

We order that appellants Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda

bear the costs of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on November 5, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 15

- 00340

- CV

Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda

v.

Aspri Investments, LLC

(NO. 2015

- CI

- 01910 IN 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK'S

RECORD

INDIGENT

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE $15.00

$0.00

$249.00

$25.00

$100.00

$20.00

$50.00 E

- PAID

PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID HARI KALAKONDA

HARI KALAKONDA

KALAKONDA

KALAKONDA

KALAKONDA

KALAKONDA

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in**  **this cause shall**  **be paid as**  **per the**  **Judgment issued by**  **this Court.** 

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this November 5, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853