alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2002 of ChemFirst Inc., as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), J. Kelley Williams, as Chief
Executive Officer of ChemFirst Inc., and Max P. Bowman, as Chief Financial
Officer of ChemFirst Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
ChemFirst Inc.


/s/ J. Kelley Williams
----------------------------
J. Kelley Williams
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002


/s/ Max P. Bowman
----------------------------
Max P. Bowman
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by ChemFirst Inc. for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**


Certifications




I,
      Wang,
      Xiao Jun, Chief Financial Officer certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dark Dynamite,
      Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





a)
      All
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
      and





b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which
      do
      not apply); and





Date:
      May
      20, 2007





/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun
#### In re: Ronald D. GRAYSON, Debtor, Ronald D. Grayson, Appellant, v. Mihoko Tanaka, Appellee.

No. 04-36105.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 2006.

Filed Jan. 3, 2007.

Michael M. Feinberg, Esq., Karr Tuttle Campbell, Seattle, WA, for Debtor.

Before: RYMER, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Debtor-Appellant Ronald Grayson (“Grayson”) appeals the bankruptcy court’s order ruling him ineligible for Chapter 13 relief. We affirm.

Grayson qualifies as a Chapter 13 debtor only if, on the date he filed his bankruptcy petition, he owed less than $290,525 in noncontingent, liquidated, unsecured debts. *See*11 U.S.C. § 109(e); Revision of Certain Dollar Amounts in the Bankruptcy Code prescribed under section 104(b) of the Code, 66 Fed.Reg. 10910-02 (Feb. 20, 2001) (adjusting the debt limit under § 109(e) from $269,250 to $290,525). “The language of the statute clearly states that the amount of the debt is determined as of *‘the date of the filing of the petition.’ ” Slack v. Wilshire Ins. Co. (In re Slack),*187 F.3d 1070, 1073 (9th Cir.1999) (quoting 11 U.S.C. § 109(e)). Therefore, in determining Chapter 13 eligibility, the “bankruptcy court cannot look to post-peti*542tion events to determine the amount of the debt.” *Id.*

The fact that the King County Superior Court ordered Grayson to put the $230,087.53 of proceeds he had received from the three real estate contracts into a blocked trust account may have affected Grayson’s interest in the proceeds, but not the debt he owed to Creditor-Appellee Mihoko Tanaka (“Tanaka”).

Grayson’s reliance on *Davis v. Cox,*356 F.3d 76 (1st Cir.2004), to support his contention that Tanaka had a secured interest in the funds is misplaced. Even if *Davis*was the law of this circuit, it does not support Grayson’s argument. The First Circuit did not conclude that Davis had a secured interest in the escrowed funds. Rather, the court held that Cox was divested of legal title, and therefore the es-crowed funds did not become a part of Cox’s bankruptcy estate. *Id.*at 93-94 (“[T]he funds held in *custodia legis*did not pass into the bankruptcy estate upon the filing of the bankruptcy petition.”). Assuming Grayson’s estate maintains an interest in the funds placed in the blocked account, Tanaka’s putative security interest is directed at the funds in the blocked account, not at any contingent property interest that may remain in the estate. Because a claim is secured only “to the extent of the value of such creditor’s interest in the estate’s interest in such property,” § 506(a)(1), Tanaka has no cognizable security interest for purposes of § 109(e).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officerof Chase Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.This certificate is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 
| Date:   January 11, 2010            |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |
| /s/ Kenneth L. Dumas                          |   |
|                                          |
| Kenneth L. Dumas                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer & Treasurer |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  |

 

----
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 21

- 11706 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus EDDIE COOK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:19

- cr
- 00335

- SCJ

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-11706 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 06/06/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 21

- 11706

Before JORDAN , ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Brandon A. Bullard, appointed counsel for Eddie Dean Cook, has moved to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessmen t ofthe relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Cook’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 21-11706 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 06/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce L. Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Bruce L. Hartman   
|Bruce L. Hartman       
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 20, 2008
#### In re Patricia A. MEYERS, Petitioner.

No. 07-1182.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R.App. Pro. Feb. 23, 2007.

Filed: March 13, 2007.

See also 2007 WL 669299.

*125Patricia A. Meyers, Frankford, DE, pro se.

Before: SLOVITER, CHAGARES and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Meyers, proceeding *pro se,*has filed a petition for a writ of prohibition alleging that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware improperly held a trial in a case she removed to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. For the reasons that follow, we will deny Meyers’ petition.

Steven Krebs filed a complaint against Meyers in the Court of Chancery seeking a determination that a lease he had entered into with Meyers was a binding contract, and that he was entitled to quiet enjoyment of the leased premises. Meyers filed an answer to the complaint, which was also signed by Dennis Smith, her “attorney-in-fact.” Because Smith was not a licensed attorney, the Chancellor of the Court of Chancery notified Meyers that Smith may not represent her. Meyers then removed the complaint to District Court. The District Court granted Krebs’ motion to remand the complaint to state court, and Meyers filed a notice of appeal from the remand order.

Meyers’ petition for a writ of prohibition is for the most part unclear. She appears to allege that the Court of Chancery improperly held a trial in Krebs’ action against her while her appeal of the District Court’s remand order was pending in this Court. To the extent Meyers seeks an order from this Court prohibiting the Court of Chancery from taking some action, we lack jurisdiction to so order. See *In re Campbell,*264 F.3d 730, 731 (7th Cir.2001) (stating that the court of appeals generally cannot use its power to issue mandamus to a state judicial officer to control or interfere with state court litigation).

In addition, to the extent Meyers seeks review of the District Court’s remand order, a writ of prohibition is not an appropriate remedy because Meyers may obtain relief through an ordinary appeal. *See In re Sch. Asbestos Litig.,*921 F.2d 1310, 1314 (3d Cir.1990). As noted, Meyers filed a notice of appeal from the District Court’s remand order. Meyers’ appeal was docketed at C.A. No. 06-4873, and we shall issue a separate opinion deciding that appeal.

Accordingly, we will deny the petition for a writ of prohibition.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12895-12896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-419; MM Docket No. 00-237; RM-10006]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Window Rock, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document substitutes Channel 285C2 for Channel 274C3 at 
Window Rock, Arizona, and modifies the license of Station KWIM 
accordingly, as requested by Western Indian Ministries, Inc. See 65 FR 
71080, November 29, 2000. Coordinates used for Channel 285C2 at Window 
Rock are those of the presently licensed site of Station KWIM, at 35-
39-19 NL and 109-01-59 WL.

DATES: Effective April 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-237, adopted February 7, 2001, and 
released February 16, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336.

[[Page 12896]]

Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arizona, is 
amended by removing Channel 274C3 and adding Channel 285C2 at Window 
Rock.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-4918 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 FSA Directives
 Search Filters AgenciesALL
    Notice Number
    StatusALL
    SubjectALL
    Notice Post Date (Last 10 Posting Dates)ALL
 Quick Filter Please SelectLast 25 FAS NoticesLast 25 FSA NoticesLast 75 FSA NoticesLast 25 RMA Notices
 Directives Keyword Search
 Sort ByPosted Date(Newest -> Oldest)Posted Date(Oldest -> Newest)TitleNotice Type
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5154]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
* * * * *

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:00 
a.m., meeting closed to the public.
    This meeting was cancelled.
* * * * *

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, March 6, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:   
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, March 8, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:   
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2001-03: The Honorable Gregory W. Meeks and the 
Meeks for Congress Committee.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:   
Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-5154 Filed 2-27-01; 2:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10493 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK BERWICK,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas (3:94-CR-204-D)

February 26, 2996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Patrick Berwick entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to

deliver more than 500 grams of cocaine. Pursuant to his plea agreement, Berwick now appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Berwick also argues that the presentence report

incorrectly calculated the base offense level.

We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion, and the briefs; and we perceive no

reversible error. Accordingly we affirm the district court’s denial of Berwick’s motion to suppress.

Berwick’s conviction and sentence are2

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11157-11158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board; Notice of Meeting

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Training for 
Future Conflicts will meet in closed session on February 28, 2001, at 
SAIC, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201. This Task Force will 
focus on identifying and characterizing what education and training are 
demanded by Joint Vision 2010/2020, and will address the development 
and demonstration time phasing over the next two decades for the 
combined triad of technology modernization, operational concepts, and 
training.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will also identify those 
approaches and techniques that potential enemies might take that could 
prepare them to revolutionize their warfare capabilities, thereby 
achieving a training surprise against the U.S. or its allies. This 
review will include, but not be limited to, unique training/education 
developments which might be spawned by allies or an adversary, training 
techniques and methodologies which might be transferred from the U.S. 
or through third parties, and finally, the possibilities emerging as a 
result of the globalization of military and information technologies, 
related commercial services and their application by other nations.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that this Defense Science Board meeting, concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly this meeting will 
be closed to the public.
    Due to critical mission requirements and scheduling conflicts, 
there is insufficient time to provide timely notice required by section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 101-
6.1015(b) of the GSA Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee 
Management, 41 CFR Part 101-6, which further requires publication at 
least 15 calendar days prior to the meeting of the Task Force.


[[Page 11158]]


    Dated: February 14, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-4334 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M