alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.21


 


Amendment to
Employment Agreement


 


THIS AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of December 1, 2016
(the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Kona Gold Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and Robert Clark (the “Executive” and, together with the Company, the “Parties”).


 


Whereas,
the Company and Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of August
12th, 2015, as amended as of December 1, 2016, and


 


Whereas,
the Parties desire to amend Section 2.3 of the Agreement in the manner reflected herein, and


 


Whereas,
the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the amendment of the Agreement in the manner reflected herein,


 


Now Therefore,
in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and conditions herein, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby
agree as follows, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date:


 


1. Salary and Benefits. Section 2.3 of the
Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following (with all capitalized terms having the meaning originally
ascribed thereto in the Agreement): “2.3. Salary and Benefits. The Executive shall be compensated in accordance with the
Company's payment practices in force from time to time. The Executive will be entitled to vacations (at such time as shall not
interfere with the Company's business needs), sick leaves and leaves of absence in accordance with the Company's general policies
and practices governing the same in force from time to time, and will be eligible to participate in such plans for the benefit
of officers or employees generally that the Company now has or institutes in the future during the Employment Period. Executive's
salary shall be Three Hundred and Fifty Thousand ($350,000.00 USD)/Per year, Two Million Seven Hundred Thousand (2,700,00) Shares
of Series A preferred, Six Hundred Fifty Thousand (650,000) Shares of Series B preferred, Five hundred Thousand (500,000) Shares
of Series D preferred, and Two Hundred Million (200,000,000) Restricted Common Shares of the Company.”


 


2. Counterparts. This
Amendment may be executed in one or more facsimile, electronic or original counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original
and both of which together shall constitute the same instrument.


 


3. Ratification.
All terms and provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby, either expressly or by necessary implication, shall remain in full
force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment, all references to the term “Agreement” in
this Amendment or the original Agreement shall include the terms contained in this Amendment.


 


[Signature Page
Follows]


 





 






 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.


 


	 	KONA GOLD SOLUTIONS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Robert Clark
	 	 	Name: Robert Clark
	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	 	 
	 	/s/ Robert Clark
	 	Robert Clark
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc.; Special Committee 159; Global Positioning System 
(GPS)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a 
request from the Department of Transportation (DOT) for RTCA to develop 
appropriate material for DOT consideration in preparing its comments on 
an FCC Notice of Proposed Rule-Making (NPRM), ``In the Matter of 
Revision of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules Regarding Ultra-Wideband 
Transmission Systems.''
    In response to this request, RTCA's Program management Committee 
has tasked Special Committee 159, Global Positioning System (GPS), to 
develop a response. Special Committee 159's next recommended 
submission, the Second Interim Report titled Ultra-Wideband Technology 
Radio Frequency Inference Effects to Global Positioning System 
Receivers and Interference Encounter Scenario Development, is being 
produced in two phases:
    Phase I. The report segment produced in the first phase, 
Preliminary Aviation Approached Segments for the Second Interim Report, 
has been provided to the Program Management Committee for review and 
was forwarded to DOT on February 13, 2001. This report represented a 
work in progress and is posted to the RTCA web site (www.rtca.org) on 
the Program Management Committee (PMC) page.
    Phase II. The complete Second Interim Report will finalized in the 
second phase and will include the phase I work as well as new material. 
The complete report will be posted to the RTCA web site by March 12, 
2001.
    The Program Management Committee will consider the completed Second 
Interim for approval at its meeting on March 27, 2001, before it is 
forwarded to DOT.
    Persons wishing to obtain information, or have questions/comments, 
should contact RTCA, Inc., Attn: Mr. Jerry Bryant, at (202) 833-9339 
(phone), (202) 833-9424 (facsimile), or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#177d75656e767963576563747639786570"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3c565e4e455d52487c4e485f5d12534e5b">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail).

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 15, 2001.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 01-4546 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
2010-0098.

#### Hill v. State.

Hamilton App. No. C-081289. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, and VI; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, *State v. Bodyke,*Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., also voted to accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V.

Motion for stay of jurisdictional consideration denied as moot.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification by the Chief Executive  Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.  S. C. Section 1350, I, Henry A. McKinnell, hereby certify that, to the best of  my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Pfizer Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended September 28, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements  of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pfizer Inc.

 

/s/ Henry A.  McKinnell             Henry A. McKinnell  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer  November 12, 2003

This certification  accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by  such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such  certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any  filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,  except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by  reference.

A signed original  of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pfizer  Inc. and will be retained by Pfizer Inc. and furnished to the Securities and  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1429

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REX PLANT,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

COLLEEN BOSSIER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:05-cv-01653-RDB)

Submitted: January 23, 2008 Decided: February 7, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas DeCaro, DECARO & HOWELL, PC, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for

Appellant. Daniel J. Tobin, BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL,

LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Rex Plant appeals the district court’s orders granting

summary judgment and awarding damages in favor of Ameriquest

Mortgage in its efforts to collect payment on a residential

mortgage loan. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Plant, No. 1:05-cv01653-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2007, and Mar. 29, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President  Finance andChief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

------------

FORM8-K

CURRENTREPORT

PURSUANTTO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Dateof report (Date of earliest event reported) January 12, 2006

PetroleumDevelopment Corporation

(ExactName of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Nevada                                             0-7246                      95-2636730

(Stateor Other Jurisdiction                  (Commission                (IRS Employer

     of Incorporation)                                 File Number)           IdentificationNo.)

 

103  East Main Street; Bridgeport, WV    26330

(Addressof Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant'stelephone number, including area code    304-842-3597

nochange

(FormerName or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

----

Item 8.01.        Otherevents of importance to security holders.

On January 12, 2006,Petroleum Development Corporation announced that it has filed the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005.  The Companybelieves this completes the requirements set by the NASDAQ ListingsQualifications Panel for the Company to continue to be listed on NASDAQ and theCompany has requested that NASDAQ confirm that belief.  If NASDAQ concurs withthe Company, the Company's symbol will be restored to PETD and its listing onNASDAQ will be continued.

----

EXHIBITINDEX

Item9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c)    Exhibits.     

The news release is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 andincorporated herein by reference 

----

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to therequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has dulycaused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto dulyauthorized.

Petroleum DevelopmentCorporation

By                    /s/ Darwin L. Stump      

            Darwin L. Stump

            Chief FinancialOfficer

            Date  January 12, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 22, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-61110 Summary Calendar

ANASTASIA NKAMINE SIEWE, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A96 087 137

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Anastasia Nkamine Siewe seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, we affirm for the following reasons: 1. Pursuant to immigration regulations, a filing fee is required in connection with the filing of a motion to reopen, unless the motion to reopen “is based exclusively on an application for relief [such as asylum] that does not require a fee.” 8 C.F.R. §No. 05-61110 -2- 1003.24(b)(2)(i)(2005). Siewe’s motion to reopen is not based exclusively on an asylum application. Siewe’s original application for asylum was withdrawn and the proceeding below addressed only the merits of her I-130 request for adjustment of status. Siewe’s motion to reopen was based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. While that claim was related to advice Siewe received regarding asylum, Siewe’s motion to reopen did not address her eligibility for asylum, and she did not attach an asylum application to the motion. See id . at § 1003.23(b)(3) (a motion to reopen for the purpose of acting on an application for relief must be accompanied by the application and all supporting documents). 2. Because the basis of Siewe’s motion to reopen did not fall within the fee exemptions set out in § 1003.8, we agree with the BIA’s determination that a filing fee was required. 3. Because we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen for lack of a filing fee, we do not address Siewe’s argument that her motion met the requirements of In re Lozada , 19 I & N Dec. 637 (BIA 1988).

The petition for review is DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification bythe Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Henry A. McKinnell,hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report ofPfizer Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in thatReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Pfizer Inc.

/s/ Henry A.McKinnell             Henry A. McKinnellChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 8, 2005

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, exceptto the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "ExchangeAct"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11179-11180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Notice of Proposed Cooperative Research and Development Agreement 
(CRADA) Negotiations Under the Technology Transfer Act of 1986

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating 
entering into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with Schering-Plough Animal Health Corporation to seek U.S. Food and 
Drug Administration approval of the antibacterial florfenicol for use 
in public and private aquaculture.
    Inquiries: If any other parties are interested in similar 
activities with the USGS, please contact: William H. Gingerich, 2630 
Fanta Reed Road, La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603; Telephone 608-783-6451; 
Internet ``<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a58535656655d53545d5f485359527a4f495d49145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0163686d6d5e66686f66647368626941747266722f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>''.

[[Page 11180]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is to meet the USGS requirement 
stipulated in the Survey Manual.

Susan Haseltine,
Chief Scientist for Biology.
[FR Doc. 01-4412 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-47-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2


COO Certification
 Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)
  I, Richard Freeman, certify that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), the 10-K report for IGEN Networks for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the IGEN Networks.
  
  April 30, 2012
  /s/ Richard Freeman
  Richard Freeman
 Director, COO
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Premium
Brands, Ltd. (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas M. Dalton, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By:  /s/ Thomas M. Dalton
   ---------------------------------
Name:  Thomas M. Dalton
President and Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003




     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Atlantic Premium Brands, Ltd. and will be retained by Atlantic
Premium Brands, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Commerce invites U.S. companies to participate in the below listed overseas trade missions. For a more complete description of each trade mission, obtain a copy of the mission statement from the Project Officer indicated for each mission below. Recruitment and selection of private sector participants for these missions will be conducted according to the Statement of Policy Governing Department of Commerce Overseas Trade Missions dated March 3, 1997. 

Computer, Telecommunications and Office Equipment (CTO) Forum and Seminar Mission, Lagos, Nigeria. March 15-16, 2001. Recruitment Closes on March 8, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Raymond Cho, U.S. Department of Commerce. Telephone 202-482-0396; or e-Mail: Raymond_Cho@ita.doc.gov

IT-Telecommunications Trade Mission to Russia, Moscow and St. Petersburg. May 12-19, 2001. Recruitment closes on April 6, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Beatrix Roberts, U.S. Department of Commerce. Telephone 202-482-2952; or e-Mail: Beatrix_Roberts@ita.doc.gov

U.S. Franchising Matchmaker Trade Delegation, Santiago, Chile and Sao Paulo, Brazil. June 4-9, 2001. Recruitment closes on April 20, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Sam Dhir, U.S. Department of Commerce. Telephone 202-482-4756; or e-Mail: Sam.Dhir@mail.doc.gov Trade mission applications received after the above closing dates will be considered only if space and scheduling constraints permit. For further information contact Mr. Reginald Beckham, U.S. Department of Commerce, telephone 202-482-5478, or e-mail Reginald_Beckham@ita.doc.gov

Dated: February 22, 2001. 

Thomas H. Nisbet, 

Director, Promotion Planning and Support Division, Office of Export Promotion Coordination. 

[FR Doc. 01-4833 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-U
944 A.2d 75

#### Re: John McCAIN’S INELIGIBILITY TO BE ON PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY BALLOT IN PENNSYLVANIA Appeal of Carmon Elliott.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 3, 2008.

Carmon Elliott, pro se.

Lawrence J. Tabas, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell *&*Hippel, L.L.P., Philadelphia, for John McCain, appellee.

*454BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD and McCAFFERY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2008, Appellant’s Application for Issuance of Subpoena is DENIED. Appellant’s Application to Amend Brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s Application to Quash is DENIED. The Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.