alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Richard FRAME; Wendell Decker; Scott Updike; J N, a minor, by his next friend and mother Gabriela Castro; Mark Hamman; Joey Salas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ARLINGTON, A Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-10630.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 26, 2011.

Miguel M. de la O (argued), de la 0, Marko, Magolnick *&*Leyton, Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Edwin Armstrong Price Voss, Jr. (argued), Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P., Richardson, TX, Denise V. Wilkerson, Asst. City Atty., Arlington, TX, for DefendantAppellee.

Dirk Christian Phillips, Jessica Dunsay Silver, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civ. Rights Div., App. Section, Washington, DC, for U.S., Amicus Curiae.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 7, 2009, 5th Cir., 2009, 575 F.3d 432)

(Opinion on Panel Rehearing, Aug. 23, 2010, 5th Cir., 2010, 616 F.3d 476)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
EXHIBIT 21.1


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                                             STATE OF
                    NAME OF CORPORATION                    INCORPORATION
                    -------------------                    -------------
Baseline, Inc.                                               Delaware
Broadway.com, Inc.                                           Delaware
hollywood.com, Inc.                                          California
Hollywood.com Franchise Corp.                                Florida
Hollywood.com International, Inc.                            Delaware
Hollywood.fr SARL                                            France
Fedora, Inc.                                                 Iowa
NetCo Partners (1)
Showtimes.com, Inc.                                          Delaware
Tekno Books (2)
Tekno Books International, LLC                               Wisconsin
Tekno Comix, Inc.                                            Florida
Tomorrow, Inc.                                               Wisconsin
----------------
(1)  NetCo Partners is a general partnership formed under the laws of the State
     of New York in which the Company has a 50% partnership interest.

(2)  Tekno Books is a general partnership formed under the laws of the State of
     Wisconsin in which the Company has a 51% ownership interest.

                                       1
Exhibit 4.1


	

    	
SEE REVERSE FOR   IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS AND CERTAIN   OTHER INFORMATION ACell, Inc. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF   DELWARE COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE $0.001 CUSIP00444J 10 2 SEE REVERSE FOR   CERTAIN DEFINITIONS FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK   OF ACell, InC. transferable on the books of the Company in Person or by duly   authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.   This Certificate and the shares represented hereby, are issued and shall be   held subject to all of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, as   amended, and the Bylaws, as amended, of the Company (copies of which are on   file with the Company and with the Transfer Agent), to all of which each holder,   by acceptance hereof, assents. This Certificate is not valid unless   countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the   facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly   authorized officers. 0000001 
    




 






 



JT TEN Shares   of the common stock represented by this certificate and do hereby irrevocably   constitutes and appoint Attorney, to transfer the said stock on the books of   the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
Exhibit 10.1




Exhibit 10.1


 


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 


	U.S. $19,402.90	Date: July 6, 2020


 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Alternative Investment
Corporation (“Borrower”) promises to pay to the order of Alternative Strategy Partners Pte Ltd (“Lender”),
the sum of U.S. 19,402.90, at an interest rate of 8% per annum on the unpaid balance. The Maturity Date is twelve (12) months from
the Effective Date (the “Maturity Date”) and is the date upon which the Principal Sum of this Note and unpaid interest
and fees (the “Note Amount”) shall be due and payable.


 


In the event this Note
is not paid on the Maturity Date, the Borrower promises to pay, in addition to the unpaid principal sum, together with all accrued
interest, all costs of collection including reasonable attorney’s fees.


 


In addition to any late
payment charge which may be due under this Note, once the indebtedness evidenced by this Note is due, the Borrower shall thereafter
pay interest on the outstanding principal balance from the Maturity Date, until the date of this Note is paid in full at an interest
rate of 18% per annum.


 


The Borrower hereby waives
presentment and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest of this Note.


 


 


 


 


 


 


	Alternative Strategy
    Partners Pte Ltd	 	Alternative Investment
    Corporation
	Yuhi Horiguchi	 	Antonio Treminio
	Chief Executive Officer & Director	 	Chief Executive Officer & Director
1

The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2372

___________

Susan Carol Bishop, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Western Surety Company; Jennifer * Eastern District of Missouri.

Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg *

Melton, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: May 2, 2006

Filed: May 5, 2006

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Susan Bishop (Bishop) appeals the district court’s1

 Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of her civil complaint. Having conducted de novo

review of the dismissal, and having accepted the facts in the complaint as true and

construing them in Bishop’s favor, see Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch.

Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998), we find the district court’s analysis to be
-2-

thorough and well-reasoned, and we reject Bishop’s arguments for reversal.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 99.1

                          EXHIBIT 99.1
        SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT OF AMERISTAR CASINOS, INC.


Ameristar Casinos, Inc. ("ACI") hereby agrees to furnish
supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy
of any of the following instruments defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt issued by ACI or its subsidiaries:

     Promissory Note, dated November 22, 1976, from Cactus
     Pete's, Inc. ("CPI") to United States of America and related
     Credit Agreement.

     Promissory Note, dated October 7, 1983, from CPI to United
     States of America and related Credit Agreements.

     Credit Agreement, dated June 27, 1996, between ACCBI and PDS
     Financial Corporation ("PDS"); Promissory Note from ACCBI to
     PDS; related Security Agreement; and Guaranty from ACI to
     PDS.

     Premium Finance Agreement, Disclosure Statement and Security
     Agreement, dated June 24, 1997, between ACI and A.I. Credit
     Corp.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

BRYAN MICHAEL HASKELL,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 30182

D.C. No.

1:17

- cr

- 00079

- BLW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2019

Seattle, Washington

Before: BERZON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and ROTHSTEIN, ** District

Judge.

The district court properly denied Bryan Haskell’s motion to suppress the

shotgun found in his car. Under Rodriguez v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 1609

(2015), police officers ma y not “ measurably extend the duration of [ a ] stop ” unless

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, United States District Judge

for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUL 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL SPage 2 of 2

the cause for the delay falls within the stop’s “mission.” Id. at 1615. Given the

specific circumstances of this case

, which are not those of a run

- of

- the

- mill traffic

stop, the officer’s asking w hether there was anything in the car he should be

concerned about was reasonably related to his mission.

At the moment the officer asked Haskell about the contents of his car, the

officer intended to leave Haskell with instructions to park the car in the

neighboring middle school parking lot. Haskell , who police learned had been

driving on a suspended license, could not himself drive the car home. Rather, he

would have to contact someone to come and drive the car away . B ecause Haskell

had not yet made any plans to have the car retrieved , the officers had no way of

knowing how long the car would remain parked outside the school . Nor could the

officers stay with the car until help arrived

, given the snowy conditions and their

need to leave the scene to attend to other accidents. As far as the police knew, it

was possible that the car c ould be left in the school parking lot unattended for days.

I n that situation, the officer’s concern as to the car’s po tentially dangerous contents

and his request for consent to search the car fell permissibly within the scope of his

mission

. Since the officer’s actions did not violate Haskell’s Fourth Amendment

rights, the district court correctly denied his motion to suppress.

AFFIRMED.
#### ELIZABETH B. WADSWORTH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BEDMINSTER, IN THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND LESLIE M. APGAR, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BEDMINSTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued January 29, 1951 —

Decided February 5, 1951.

*506Before Judges Freund, Proctor and Rogees.

*Mr. Robert R. Daly*argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant *(Messrs.*Daly, Hillis, *Hall & McCormick,*attorneys).

*Mr. Leon Gerofsky*argued the cause for the respondents *(Mr. William T.*Stewart, Jr., of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the' reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-02903, No. 333-04712, No. 333-87124, No. 333-102109, No. 333-125291, No. 333-134031, No. 333-143285, and No. 333-151290 on Form S-8, of our report dated March 16,
2009 relating to the financial statements of West Marine, Inc., (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of a new accounting standard), and the effectiveness of West Marine,
Incs internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Marine, Inc. for the year ended January 3, 2009.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP               
|                                        
|San Francisco, California March 16,
2009
OAKRIDGE GLOBAL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
   Colorado
94-3431032(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)incorporation or organization)
 
 Palm Bay, FL 32905
  
 (321) 610-7959
  
 Not Applicable
  
  
   
       
 
  
  
   Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) , as of March 31, 2015. Based on such review and evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2015 , our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the reporting obligations of the Exchange Act , including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, w ithin the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that info rmation required to be disclosed by an iss u er in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
  A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of any system of controls also is based in part on certain assumptions regarding the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that  any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Given these and other inherent limitations of contro l systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their stated goals under all potential future conditions.
   
       Item 4. Controls and Procedures
  
 
  
  
  
 Date: April 4 , 2016  By:
 
    
     Date: April 4 , 2016  By:
 
     Date: April 4 , 2016  By:
 
 Karen Jackson
Third Court of Appeals Price Daniel Sr. Bldg. 209 West 14 th Street, Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701 3rdclerksandreporters@txcourts.gov Attention: Mr. Jeffrey Kyle RE: THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. TOMMY JOE KELLEY COURT OF APPEALS NO. 03 - 15 - 00577 - CR and 03 - 11 - 00801 - CR TR IAL COURT CAUSE NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 11
- 30 0379 390 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS Dear Mr. Kyle : Please be advised that the 17

- volume Reporter’s Record in the above

- st yled cause was filed March 5, 2012 . It was filed under Court of Appeals No. 03 - 11 - 00801 - CR
. There has been no subsequent record hearing had in the above

- referenced cause since that date. If I may be of any further assistance to you in this or any other matter, please don’t hesitate to call upon me at once. Respectfully yours, **Marti Ruby** Offi cial Court Reporter 390 th Judicial District Court Travis County, Texas 512
- 854
- 4721 Marti.ruby@traviscountytx.gov
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Credit Management Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Alexander Gordon Jardin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






U /s/
      Alexander Gordon Jardin


Alexander
      Gordon Jardin Chief
        Executive Officer
 August
      14, 2006
2009-1893.

#### State v. Calhoun.

Cuyahoga App. No. 91328, 2009-Ohio-2361. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 31.2
Cronos Global Income Fund XV
Rule 13a-14 Certifications
     I, John Kallas, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cronos GlobalIncome Fund XV (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: March 26, 2004
/s/ JOHN KALLAS
Exhibit 10.13


 


LEASE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


 


THIS LEASE MODIFICATION
AGREEMENT is to be attached to and form a part of a certain Lease (which together with any amendments, modifications, and extensions
thereof is hereinafter called "Lease") made the 22nd day of May 2019, between 3090 S Hwy 14, LLC, as Landlord,
and Goldleaf Distribution, LLC, as Tenant, covering the premises known as 3092 South Hwy 14, Greer, South Carolina, consisting
of 15,000 square foot within a 30,000 square foot building and all appurtenances thereon (hereinafter called the "Leased Premises").


 


WITNESSETH THAT
the Lease is hereby modified and expanded to include the entire 30,000 square feet. This modification and extension shall
be upon all the terms, conditions, covenants and agreements contained in the original Lease (referenced above), with any exceptions
noted below:


 


Paragraph 1.03 of the
Lease shall be deleted and reinserted to read as follows:


 


1.03 Base Rent. Beginning on May
1, 2020 and continuing through the Renewal Term of this Lease agreement, Lessee shall pay the Lessor without notice, demand, reduction,
abatement, set off or any defense, before the first day of each month in accordance with the Rent Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit
C and incorporated herein by reference.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have signed and sealed this extension agreement this 21 day of April, 2020.


 


	ATTEST:	 	LANDLORD: 3090 S Hwy 14, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	 	By: 	/s/ Hunter Garrett
	 	 	 
	 	 	Print Name: 	Hunter Garrett
	 	 	 
	 	 	Its: 	Member
	 	 	 
	 	 	Date of Execution:	4/21/2020 │12:38 PM EDT
	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	TENANT:	Goldleaf Distribution, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	 	By: 	/s/ Robert Clark
	 	 	 
	 	 	Print Name: 	Robert Clark
	 	 	 
	 	 	Its: 	CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 	Date of Execution: 	4/21/20


 




     


     


    

 


Exhibit C


 


Rent Schedule


 


Base Rent Year 1:


 


	Year	 	Monthly	 	 	Annual	 
	1	 	$	10,200.00	 	 	$	122,400.00	 



 


Additional Rent:


 


	 	 	Per SF	 	 	Monthly	 	 	Annual	 
	Taxes	 	$	0.64	 	 	$	1,600.00	 	 	$	19,200.00	 
	Insurance	 	$	0.21	 	 	$	525.00	 	 	$	6,300.00	 
	Operating Expenses	 	$	0.36	 	 	$	900.00	 	 	$	10,800.00	 
	Total	 	$	1.21	 	 	$	3,025.00	 	 	$	36,300.00	 



 


Total Rent Year 1:


 


	 	 	Monthly	 	 	Annual	 
	Base Rent	 	$	10,200.00	 	 	$	122,400.00	 
	Additional Rent	 	$	3,025.00	 	 	$	36,300.00	 
	Total Rent Year 1	 	$	13,225.00	 	 	$	158,700.00	 



 




    	 	2
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies
International, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen H. Durland, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




                                   /s/ Stephen Durland
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Stephen H. Durland, Chief Financial Officer
                                   May 15, 2003