alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to section 13 of Public Law 92-463, fiscal years 1999 and 2000 annual reports for the following Health Resources and Services Administration's Federal advisory committee has been filed with the Library of Congress: Health Professions and Nurse Education Special Emphasis Panel. 

Copies are available to the public for inspection at the Library of Congress Newspaper and Current Periodical Reading Room, James Madison Memorial Building, Room LM-133, First Street and Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. Copies may be obtained from: Jennifer Burks, M.S.N., Executive Secretary, Health Professions and Nurse Education Special Emphasis Panel, Parklawn Building, Room 8C-23, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 443-6339. 

      ( print page 12529)    
Dated: February 20, 2001. 

Jane M. Harrison, 

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination. 

[FR Doc. 01-4686 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
 March 24, 2006
 By
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz,President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas,Chief Financial Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp,.
General Partner of the Partnership  
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of
Section 18 of said Act.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21.1


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

West Marine Products, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine Puerto Rico, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine FSC, Inc., a Barbados corporation

West Marine Finance Company, a California corporation

West Marine Management Company, a California corporation

West Marine LBC, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine IHC I, Inc., a California corporation

West Marine IHC II, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine, Inc., a Delaware corporation

E&B Marine LBC, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine IHC I, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine IHC II, Inc., a California corporation

E&B Marine Supply, Inc., a New Jersey corporation

E&B Marine Supply, Inc., a Maryland corporation

E&B Marine Supply (Florida), Inc., a Delaware corporation

Goldbergs' Marine Distributors, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

James Bliss & Co., Inc., Massachusetts corporation

Sea Ranger Marine Inc., a Delaware corporation

Krista Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Central Marine Supply Inc., a New Jersey corporation
Exhibit 32.1


       Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
       -------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Louis D. Paolino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Mace Security
International, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of Mace
Security International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 which this
certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
information contained in the December 31, 2003 Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mace
Security International, Inc.


Dated: April 28, 2004
                                              /s/ Louis D. Paolino, Jr.
                                              ------------------------
                                              Louis D. Paolino, Jr.
The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4060

___________

Dennis Russell, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas *

Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 28, 1998

 Filed: June 1, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Russell appeals from the district court&s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

1

§ 1983 action against Willis Sargent, who, during the pertinent time period, was
-2-

warden at the Arkansas Department of Correction&s Jefferson County Jail/Correctional

Facility. Mr. Russell alleged he was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment by

being denied medical treatment for his painful arthritis and that Warden Sargent was

responsible for this constitutional violation. 

Following an evidentiary hearing before the magistrate judge, see Johnson v. BiState Justice Ctr., 12 F.3d 133, 135 (8th Cir. 1993), the district court conducted a de

novo review of the record and adopted the magistrate judge&s recommendation that Mr.

Russell&s claim against Warden Sargent be dismissed. We conclude the district court&s

judgment was correct because Mr. Russell offered no evidence that Warden Sargent

was aware by February 1, 1995 (the date of Russell&s complaint) that Russell was being

denied medical care or otherwise mistreated. See Choate v. Lockhart, 7 F.3d 1370,

1376 (8th Cir. 1993) (supervisor may be liable under § 1983 for Eighth Amendment

violation only when supervisor is personally involved or where supervisor&s corrective

inaction amounts to deliberate indifference toward or tacit authorization of violation).

Mr. Russell complains that the district court incorrectly stated that he had filed

no objections to the magistrate judge&s recommendation. Even assuming Mr. Russell&s

objections were timely, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), we conclude that any error in the

district court&s failure to review them was harmless because the court stated it

conducted a de novo review of the record, including the testimony and exhibits. See

28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1); cf. Sumlin v. United States, 46 F.3d 48, 49 (8th Cir.1995) (per

curiam).

Finally, we conclude the magistrate did not abuse his discretion in denying

Russell&s motion for appointment of counsel. See Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th

Cir. 1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[ DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 10-10516

Non-Argument Panel

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cv-00062-CDL 

DENNIS RILEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

The, Jointly and Severally,

RYAN WILLIAMSON, Deputy, Jointly and 

Severally,

 

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________

(September 14, 2010)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Dennis Riley appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendant, Ryan

Williams, on Riley’s various Fourth Amendment claims brought pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 in connection with his arrest by Williams. Riley also appeals the

grant of summary judgment to Williams on Riley’s state law claim for intentional

infliction of emotional distress.

The district court granted summary judgment to Williams after it concluded

that the undisputed facts in this case, taken in the light most favorable to Riley,

conclusively demonstrate that Williams did not violate any of Riley’s

constitutional rights during the course of Riley’s arrest. The district court also

concluded that there was no evidence that Williams acted with malice during the

arrest, as required under Georgia law to establish a claim for intentional infliction

of emotional distress.

Our review of the briefs on appeal and the record in this case indicate no

error in the district court’s analysis of the facts or application of the law to those

facts. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
Gregory Krzemien, the Principal Financial Officer of Mace Security
International, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of Mace Security International,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “December 31, 2009 Form 10-K”),
which this certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a)
or 78o(d)) and information contained in the December 31, 2009 Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Mace Security International, Inc.




Dated:
March 24, 2010





/s/Gregory M. KrzemienGregory
      M. KrzemienPrincipal
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer
NEWS   FROM
Petroleum Development Corporation
**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  December 23, 2003	**CONTACT:**  Darwin L. Stump

	(304) 842-3597   

	http://www.petd.com
**Petroleum Development Announces Purchase

Oil and Natural Gas Properties in Colorado**
 

Bridgeport, West Virginia... Petroleum Development Corporation (NASDAQ/NMS PETD) today announced it closed the purchase of interests in oil and natural gas properties in the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Weld County, Colorado from one of its joint venture partners for $5.2 million.  The effective date of the purchase is October 1, 2003.  Nearly all the wells are currently operated by Petroleum Development Corporation. The Company will fund the purchase through its existing bank financing facility.

The purchase includes approximately 3.1 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) of proved developed producing (PDP) reserves  from interests in 20.6 net wells (230 gross) and 1.8 Bcfe of proved developed non-producing reserves (PDNP) from interests in 17 net wells (183gross). The acquired property also includes over 30 additional undrilled locations. The estimated PDNP reserves are expected to be available through refracing existing wells for estimated future capital expenditures of $1.5 million.  The average cost for the total proved reserves is $1.21 per thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalents (Mcfe).

This purchase represents an  increase of approximately 3% in the Company's PDP reserves and an increase of approximately 13% in PDNP reserves, as compared to the 2002 year-end totals adjusted for the Williams acquisition earlier this year. Current daily production from the purchased interests is approximately 1.6 million cubic feet (Mmcf). The Company's total production prior to the purchase was about 35 Mmcf of natural gas equivalents per day.

About Petroleum Development Corporation

Petroleum Development Corporation (www.petd.com) has been named on the *FSB: Fortune Small Business Magazine* list of America's 100 Fastest-Growing Small Companies and was added to the Russell 3000 List of companies this year. An independent energy company, PDC is primarily engaged in the development, production and marketing of natural gas in the Appalachian Basin, the Rocky Mountains and Michigan.

Certain matters discussed within this press release are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although PDC believes the expectations reflected in such forward- looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include financial performance, oil and gas prices, drilling program results, drilling results, regulatory changes, changes in local or national economic conditions and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's reports filed with the SEC, including quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, reports on Form 8-K and annual reports on Form 10-K.

###
**103 East Main Street - P. O. Box 26 - Bridgeport, West Virginia - Phone:  (304) 842-3597****
----

----

|                                                                                                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                              |  |
| Fiscal Quarter(s)                                                                                                            | Maximum Leverage Ratio |
| January 12, 2011 through end of the first fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2011 fiscal year                                  | 4.25 to 1.00 |
| second fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2011 fiscal year                                                                     | 4.50 to 1.00 |
| third fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2011 fiscal year                                                                      | 3.75 to 1.00 |
| fourth fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2011 fiscal year                                                                     | 3.50 to 1.00 |
| first fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2012 fiscal year through the second fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2012 fiscal year | 3.25 to 1.00 |
| third fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2012 fiscal year through the third fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2013 fiscal year  | 3.00 to 1.00 |
| fourth fiscal quarter of the Borrower's 2013 fiscal year and thereafter                                                      | 2.75 to 1.00" |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
# FY21_Q1

# Percent Positives - User Notes
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (No. 333-10775, No.33-642, No. 33-1532 and No. 33-96684) and Forms S-8 (No. 33-96686, No.333-44897, and No. 333-76943) of our report dated February 1, 2002, relating tothe consolidated financial statements and schedule of Monterey Pasta Company,which appear in this Form 10-K.

 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP

 

San Francisco, California

February 4, 2002
Exhibit 32.1


                Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
                15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (AS ADOPTED
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                  ACT OF 2002)

I, Aaron P.  Hollander,  as Chief Executive  Officer of First Aviation  Services
Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  that  to my
knowledge:

(1)  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the
     period  ended  October  31,  2006  (the  "Report"),  filed  with  the  U.S.
     Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
     and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  December 15, 2006

                                                   /S/ AARON P. HOLLANDER
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Aaron P. Hollander
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       25
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,122
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,562
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,581
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          32,017
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            32,520
<LOANS>                                        315,353
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 400,237
<DEPOSITS>                                     315,390
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,418
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 315,353
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,318
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,838
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,156
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,279
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,416
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,740
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      649
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,387
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,754
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,754
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.80
<LOANS-NON>                                        242
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,063
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (28)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,684
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,684
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
AMENDMENT DATED DECEMBER 16, 1996
                        ALLIED LIFE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                       LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

         The ALLIED Life Financial  Corporation  Long-Term  Management Incentive
Plan  (the  "Plan")  was  amended  by the  Executive  Committee  of the Board of
Directors of ALLIED Life Financial  Corporation  (the "Company") on December 16,
1996,  to reflect  the changes set forth  below.  Capitalized  terms used herein
shall have the meaning as assigned thereto in the Plan.

         1.  Definition of Window Period.  The definition of "Window
Period" as set forth in Article 2, subsection "ad", is deleted in
its entirety.

         2.  Committee.  The references to Rule 16b-3(c)(2) in the
second paragraph of Section 3.1 are amended to read "Rule 16b-3".

         3. Six-Month Holding Period. The second paragraph of Section 6.7 of the
Plan is amended by the deletion of the parenthetical  "(provided that the Shares
which are tendered must have been held by the  Participant  for at least six (6)
months prior to their tender to satisfy the Option Price)".

         4.  Rule 16b-3 Requirements.  Section 7.9 of the Plan is
deleted in its entirety and shall remain reserved for future use.

         5.  Amendment and Shareholder Approval.  Section 11.1 of the
Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         The Board may at any time and from time to time, alter, amend,  suspend
         or terminate the Plan in whole or in part; provided,  that no amendment
         which requires  shareholder  approval in order for the Plan to continue
         to  satisfy  the  requirements  of  Section  422 of the Code,  shall be
         effective unless such amendment shall be approved by the requisite vote
         of shareholders of the Company entitled to vote thereon.

         6.  Share Withholding.  Section 12.2 of the Plan is amended to
read in its entirety as follows:

         With respect to  withholding  required  upon the exercise of Options or
         SARs, upon the lapse of  restrictions on Restricted  Stock, or upon any
         other taxable event  hereunder,  Participants  may elect to satisfy the
         withholding  requirement,  in whole or in part,  by having the  Company
         withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date of the tax is to
         be determined  equal to the minimum  statutory total tax which could be
         imposed on the transaction. All elections shall be irrevocable, made in
         writing, and signed by the Participant.

         7.  Requirements of Law.  The second paragraph of Section 15.3
of the Plan is deleted in its entirety.

         8.  Securities Law Compliance.  The first sentence of Section
15.4 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         With respect to Insiders,  transactions under this Plan are intended to
         comply with the  applicable  conditions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors
         under the 1934 Act.
                                       87
[No. 58919-9-I.

Division One.

September 10, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert Leo Penick, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 06-1-04679-6, Nicole Maclnnes, J., entered September 18, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.