alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6114

ERIC ERWIN COLLIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANKLIN FREEMAN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-95-381-5-BR)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Eric Erwin Collier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. To the extent

that Appellant seeks review of the district court's prior order

dismissing his complaint, such appeal is untimely under Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1), and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider it.

See Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264

(1978). We therefore dismiss this portion of the appeal. Collier v.

Freeman, No. CA-95-381-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Plant # Plant Name City State
M85B JBS-Swift Beardstown IL
M1620 Quality Pork Processors, Inc. Austin MN
M46491+P46491 WholeStone Farms Cooperative, Inc. Fremont NE
M360+P360 Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp. Los Angeles (Vernon) CA
M791+P791+V791 | Clemens Food Group, LLC Hatfield PA
M13597+V13597 | Seaboard Foods Guymon OK
M791C Clemens Food Group Coldwater MI
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of Richman TaxCredit
      Properties Inc., general partner ofRichman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., generalpartner
      of the RegistrantFebruary
      13, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the laws of the United States, including the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996, the Diplomatic Security Act of 1986, the Foreign Service Act of 1980, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, and the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, I hereby delegate to David G. Carpenter, the Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security, to the extent authorized by law, all authorities vested in the Under Secretary of State for Management, including all authorities vested in the Secretary of State that have been or may be delegated or redelegated to that Under Secretary. 

Any authorities covered by this delegation may also be exercised by the Deputy Secretary, the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, or the Under Secretary for Economic, Business and Agricultural Affairs. 

This delegation shall expire upon the appointment of an individual to serve as Under Secretary of State for Management. 

                    This memorandum shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: January 22, 2001. 

Colin L. Powell, 

Secretary of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-4999 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-10-U
voxx-ex101_85.htm



EXHIBIT 10.1

 

AMENDMENT made effective as of April 6, 2020 to Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) dated July 8, 2019 between Voxx International Corporation, 180 Marcus Blvd., Hauppauge, New York 11788 (the “Company”) and Charles M. Stoehr, an individual residing at 262 Sunset Avenue, Westhampton Beach, New York (the “Executive”) 

WHEREAS, due the COVID-19 pandemic crisis (the “Crisis”), the Company has instituted a multitude of cost savings actions, including, without limitation, employee furloughs and salary reductions; and

WHEREAS, the Executive fully understands and appreciates the magnitude of the Crisis and its detrimental effect on the Company’s business; and 

WHEREAS, notwithstanding the existence of the Employment Agreement, the Executive is willing to voluntarily participate in the salary reduction program.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS:

1.Effective as of April 6, 2020, Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to reduce the Executive’s Base Salary from $400,000 (hereinafter, the “Original Base Salary”) to $320,000 (hereinafter, the “Reduced Base Salary”).  All capitalized terms contained herein are defined in the Employment Agreement.

2.The Reduced Base Salary shall remain in place through the earlier to occur of the conclusion of the Company’s 2021 fiscal year or until such time as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company determines that it is financially prudent and in the best interest of the Company to restore the Base Salary.

3.In the event that Accrued Obligations or Post-Employment Benefits are due and owing to the Executive by the Company for Termination Without Cause or Executive’s Resignation for Good Reason, such Accrued Obligations or Post-Employment Benefits shall be calculated as if the Original Base Salary was in effect at the time of such Termination or Resignation, as the case may be.  

4.Except as modified herein, the Parties ratify and confirm the Employment Agreement as written.






 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.

EMPLOYER: 

VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

 

By: /s/ Patrick M. Lavelle

Patrick M. Lavelle, President/CEO 

 

EXECUTIVE:

 

/s/ Charles M. Stoehr

Charles M. Stoehr
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-11706

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDDIE COOK, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00335-SCJ-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-11706 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 06/06/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11706

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon A. Bullard, appointed counsel for Eddie Dean 

Cook, has moved to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cook’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-11706 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 06/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2
2009-1205.

#### State v. Monroe.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-1062, 2009-Ohio-2343.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [MT-020-1310-AC] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Montana, Billings and Miles City Field Offices, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council will have a meeting on April 5, 2001 at the Hampton Inn Conference Room, 5110 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana starting at 8 a.m. Primary agenda topics include off-highway vehicle use and travel management planning with updates on the Oil and Gas EIS, and Pompeys Pillar. 

The meeting is open to the public and the public comment period is set for 11 a.m. The public may make oral statements before the Council or file written statements for the Council to consider. Depending on the number of persons wishing to make an oral statement, a per person time limit may be established. Summary minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marilyn Krause, Public Affairs Specialist, Miles City Field Office, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, Montana 59301, telephone (406) 233-2831. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Council is to advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management. The 15 member Council includes individuals who have expertise, education, training or practical experience in the planning and management of public lands and their resources and who have a knowledge of the geographical jurisdiction of the Council. 

Dated: February 20, 2001.

Todd S. Christensen, 

Assistant Field Manager, Resources. 

[FR Doc. 01-4969 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-U
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W.
Lance Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      April 27, 2009
              
              /s/
      W. Lance AndersonW.
      Lance AndersonChairman
      of the Board of Directors andChief
      Executive Officer




This
certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Significant Subsidiaries



|                                                       |  |              |  |                  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------ |  | -----------------
|Subsidiaries                                           |  | Jurisdiction |  | Usual Name       
|                                                       |  |             
|Ampla Energia e Serviços S.A.                          |  | Brazil       |  | Ampla            
|Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.              |  | Brazil       |  | Cachoeira Dourada
|Central Geradora Termelétrica Fortaleza S.A.           |  | Brazil       |  | Endesa Fortaleza 
|Chilectra S.A.                                         |  | Chile        |  | Chilectra        
|Codensa S.A. E.S.P.                                    |  | Colombia     |  | Codensa          
|Companhia de Interconexão Energética S.A.              |  | Brazil       |  | CIEN             
|Compañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.                     |  | Chile        |  | San Isidro       
|Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.                       |  | Chile        |  | Celta            
|Companhía Energética de Ceará S.A.                     |  | Brazil       |  | Coelce           
|Edegel S.A.A.                                          |  | Peru         |  | Edegel           
|Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.                                     |  | Colombia     |  | Emgesa           
|Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.                         |  | Argentina    |  | Edesur           
|Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.                       |  | Chile        |  | Pehuenche        
|Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.                  |  | Chile        |  | Endesa Chile     
|Endesa Brasil S.A.                                     |  | Brazil       |  | Endesa Brasil    
|Endesa Costanera S.A.                                  |  | Argentina    |  | Endesa Costanera 
|Endesa Eco S.A.                                        |  | Chile        |  | Endesa Eco       
|Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.                          |  | Argentina    |  | El Chocón        
|Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. |  | Peru         |  | Edelnor
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DYLAN ISAAC BURSELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

COLLETTE PETERS; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-35405 

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01978-HZ 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2021**

Portland, Oregon

Before: WARDLAW, TALLMAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Dylan Bursell appeals the summary judgment in favor of defendants for 

failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act 

(“PLRA”) on his Section 1983 claim over alleged secondary exposure to pepper 

spray while in custody at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution (“EOCI”). 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and, reviewing de novo, we 

affirm. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). 

Bursell asserts that he was not required to exhaust the prison’s 

administrative grievance procedures because administrative remedies were not 

“available” to him within the meaning of the PLRA. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). 

Bursell argues that because two other prisoners were ultimately denied 

administrative relief over the same alleged pepper spray exposure, the grievance 

process “operate[d] as a simple dead end” which he was not required to exhaust. 

Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1856 (2016). 

The PLRA requires a prisoner to comply with the prison’s own procedures 

for pursuing administrative remedies in order to properly exhaust. Jones v. Bock,

549 U.S. 199, 218 (2007). Under EOCI’s grievance procedures, Bursell was 

required to grieve the March 13, 2018, pepper spray exposure incident no later than

April 12, 2018. The other two prisoners’ grievances were not finally denied until 

June 2018. That two other prisoners’ grievances were denied after Bursell’s 

deadline to file his own grievance is not sufficient to suggest “that there is 

something in his particular case that made the existing and generally available 

administrative remedies effectively unavailable to him.” Albino, 747 F.3d at 1172; 

see also Ross, 136 S. Ct. at 1859 (requiring “facts on the ground” to demonstrate 

that there is “no [] potential” of relief through the grievance process). Bursell was 
3 

therefore required to exhaust EOCI’s grievance procedures before filing his federal

suit.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2056 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2056

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To redesignate the Post Office building located at 600 Princess Anne 
   Street in Fredericksburg, Virginia, as the ``Samuel E. Perry Post 
                           Office Building''.

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2056

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the Post Office building located at 600 Princess Anne 
   Street in Fredericksburg, Virginia, as the ``Samuel E. Perry Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Post Office building located at 600 Princess Anne Street in 
Fredericksburg, Virginia, and known as the Main Post Office, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Samuel E. Perry Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Post Office building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Samuel E. Perry Post 
Office Building.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 1993.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5


<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                              7,081,982
<SECURITIES>                        000
<RECEIVABLES>                       376,959
<ALLOWANCES>                        141,334
<INVENTORY>                         000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    7,814,354
<PP&E>                              33,150,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      41,451,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               358,251
<BONDS>                             000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               000
<PREFERRED>                         000
<COMMON>                            000
<OTHER-SE>                          9,597,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        41,451,099
<SALES>                             2,791,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    4,747,727
<CGS>                               000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       4,212,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    365,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,686,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     000
<INCOME-TAX>                        000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,529,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                      000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     000
<CHANGES>                           000
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,529,501)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (21.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (21.55)


</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                David Salzman                                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |        |
| David                Salzman                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |        |
| Chief                Executive Officer of Richman TaxCredit                Properties Inc., general partner ofRichman                Tax Credit Properties L.P., generalpartner                of the RegistrantMarch                28, 2008 |   |   |        |

----