alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5




 


Original
Contract No.: KINTON-SC-KA-20180725


 


Supplementary
Contract


 


Party
A: Guangzhou XiaoXiang Health Industry Co., LTD


 


PartyB:
Guangzhou Jintong FSMP Co., Ltd


 


Unless
otherwise stated, all terms in this agreement have the same definition as in the “Sales Contract” signed by both parties
with the contract number KINTON-SC-KA-20180725.


 


In
accordance with the principle of mutual benefit, Party A and Party B hereby enter into the following supplementary agreements
by adding some provisions based on the original contract through friendly consultations.


 


1.
The added provisions of the agreement is:


 


1.1
The product called Power Centinent under the original contract (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement Product”)
is jointly developed by Party A and Party B, and both parties have the obligation to keep the confidential formula of the agreement
product. Party B represents and warrants that the formula of the agreement product is only for the use of the product of Party
A, and it must not disclose or sell the detailed information of the agreement product formula to a third party.


 


1.2
Party A shall have the exclusive right to sell the Products (including the formula of the Products) hereunder and shall sell the
products within and outside the People’s Republic Of China. Party B shall not sell the Products online or offline by itself, and
it shall not authorize any third party to sell the Products.


 


2.
After this agreement comes into effect, it becomes an integral part of the original contract and has the same legal effect as
the original contract. When this agreement conflicts with the original contract, this agreement shall prevail.


 


3.
This agreement is made in two originals, with one held by Party A and one held by Party B. Both originals with equal legal effect
and shall come into force upon being signed and sealed by both parties.


 




    	 



     


    

 





	Name
    of Party A: Guangzhou XiaoXiang Health Industry Co. LTD	 
	 	 
	(Seal)	 
	 	 
	Signature
    of the representative:	 
	 	 
	Date:
     	 
	 	 
	Name
    of Party B: Guangzhou Jintong FSMP Co., Ltd	 
	 	 
	(Seal)	 
	 	 
	Signature
    of the representative: 	 
	 	 
	Date:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51474 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TERRY DIAL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-142-2

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Terry Dial appeals his guilty-plea conviction for aiding and abetting in the possession of pseudoephedrine to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Dial argues that trial counsel was ineffective, during rearraignment, for withdrawing Dial’s motion to suppress evidence seized from his tent. As a general rule, we decline to review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, although we may do so in exceptional cases. See United States v. Higdon ,No. 06-51474 -2- 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). This is not such a case. Accordingly, we decline to review Dial’s ineffective assistance claim in this direct appeal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed without prejudice to Dial’s right to raise an ineffective assistance claim in a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We express no view on the merits of such a motion.
AFFIRMED.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2294 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2294

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To redesignate the Post Office building located at 1000 Lamar Street 
in Wichita Falls, Texas, as the ``Graham B. Purcell, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Post Office building located at 1000 Lamar Street in Wichita 
Falls, Texas, and known as the Main Post Office, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Graham B. Purcell, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Post Office building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Graham B. Purcell, 
Jr. Post Office Building.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
EX-10.10





 Exhibit 10.10 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE 

This THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of July 9, 2020, by and
between PTK Acquisition Corp, a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”) and PTK Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Payee”). All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note (as defined below). 
 WHEREAS, Maker has issued that certain Promissory
Note, dated October 10, 2019, in the principal amount of $300,000, to Payee, as amended on April 22, 2020 and June 5, 2020 (the “Note”). 

WHEREAS, Maker and Payee desire to amend the Note as set forth herein. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable
consideration the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment.
Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “1. Principal. The principal balance of this
Promissory Note (this “Note”) shall be payable as follows: upon the consummation of Maker’s initial public offering of its securities (the “IPO”), the entire principal balance of this Note shall be convertible
into 600,000 private warrants (as defined in the registration statement on Form S-1 filed by Maker on or about July 10, 2020 issuable to Payee at a purchase price of $0.50 per warrant; provided, that the entire principal balance of this Note
shall be due and payable in cash on the date on which Maker determines not to conduct an initial public offering of its securities. The principal balance may be prepaid at any time.” 

2. Effect of Amendment. All terms and provisions of the Note shall continue in full force and effect except as expressly modified by
this Amendment. 
 3. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefits of the parties hereto
and their respective successors and assigns and is not intended to confer upon any other Person any rights or remedies hereunder. 
 4.
Construction. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICT OF LAW PROVISIONS THEREOF. 

5. Captions; Counterparts. The captions in this Amendment are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part of or affect the
construction or interpretation of any provision of this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature Page Follows] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of
the date first above written. 
  

	
	PTK ACQUISITION CORP.
	
	By:
	
	/s/ Peter Kuo
	 Name: Peter Kuo
 Title: Chief Executive
Officer

	
	PTK HOLDINGS LLC
	
	/s/ Peter Kuo
	 Name: Peter Kuo
 Title: Manager
voxx-ex102_84.htm



EXHIBIT 10.2

 

AMENDMENT made effective as of April 6, 2020 to Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) dated July 8, 2019 between Voxx International Corporation, 180 Marcus Blvd., Hauppauge, New York 11788 (the “Company”) and Loriann Shelton, an individual residing at 8 Emily Court, Moriches, New York 11955 (the “Executive”) 

WHEREAS, due the COVID-19 pandemic crisis (the “Crisis”), the Company has instituted a multitude of cost savings actions, including, without limitation, employee furloughs and salary reductions; and

WHEREAS, the Executive fully understands and appreciates the magnitude of the Crisis and its detrimental effect on the Company’s business; and 

WHEREAS, notwithstanding the existence of the Employment Agreement, the Executive is willing to voluntarily participate in the salary reduction program.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS:

1.Effective as of April 6, 2020, Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to reduce the Executive’s Base Salary from $450,000 (hereinafter, the “Original Base Salary”) to $360,000 (hereinafter, the “Reduced Base Salary”).  All capitalized terms contained herein are defined in the Employment Agreement.

2.The Reduced Base Salary shall remain in place through the earlier to occur of the conclusion of the Company’s 2021 fiscal year or until such time as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company determines that it is financially prudent and in the best interest of the Company to restore the Base Salary.

3.In the event that Accrued Obligations or Post-Employment Benefits are due and owing to the Executive by the Company for Termination Without Cause or Executive’s Resignation for Good Reason, such Accrued Obligations or Post-Employment Benefits shall be calculated as if the Original Base Salary was in effect at the time of such Termination or Resignation, as the case may be.  

4.Except as modified herein, the Parties ratify and confirm the Employment Agreement as written.






 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.

EMPLOYER: 

VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

 

By: /s/ Patrick M. Lavelle

Patrick M. Lavelle, President/CEO 

 

EXECUTIVE:

 

/s/ Loriann Shelton

Loriann Shelton
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11301-11302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy:

    Name of Committee: Minority Programs Review Committee, MARC 
Review Subcommittee A.
    Date: February 20-21, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, The Delaware 
Room, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Richard I. Martinez, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes

[[Page 11302]]

of Health, Natcher Building, Room 1AS-19G, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, 
(301) 594-2849.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-4445 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration A-428-825 

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of extension of time limits. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the time limits for the preliminary results of the 1999-2000 administrative review of the antidumping duty order (A-428-825) on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils from Germany. This review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise to the United States, Krupp Thyssen Nirosta GmbH (KTN), and the period January 4, 1999 through June 30, 2000. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

February 28, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martin Odenyo at (202) 482-5254 or Robert James at (202) 482-0649, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Enforcement Group III, Office Eight, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Because it is not practicable to complete these reviews within the normal statutory time limit, the Department is extending the time limits for completion of the preliminary results until July 31, 2001 in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. See Memorandum from Richard O. Weible to Joseph A. Spetrini, on file in Room B-099 of the main Commerce building. The deadline for the final results of this review will continue to be 120 days after publication of the preliminary results. 

This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675 (a)(3)(A) (2000)). 

Dated: February 20, 2001. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.

[FR Doc. 01-4896 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

###### [Notice 01-029]

# AGENCY:

 National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

 Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                         In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National                               ( print page 11604)                            Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Flight Advisory Committee.                    

# DATES:

 Tuesday, March 13, 2001 from 1:00 p.m. until 2:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 E Street, SW., Room MIC 7A, Washington, DC 20546.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Susan Y. Edgington (Stacey), Code M, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-4519.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:
    - Shuttle upgrades status.

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

Dated: February 21, 2001.

Beth M. McCormick,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 01-4656 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. David Henry ANTHONY, also known as David Stubblefield, also known as David Anthony Chacon, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-20866

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 14, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David Adler, Bellaire, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The CJA-appointed counsel representing David Anthony has moved for leave to *833withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Anthony has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Anthony’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5m Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant *to 5m Cir.*R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *833published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-90,000-01 & WR-90,000-02

EX PARTE QUENTIN DWIGHT DAWSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W15-75741-X(A) & W15-75665-X(A)

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 6 OF DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two charges

of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to imprisonment for fifteen years in each case. 

On January 7, 2019, orders designating issues were signed by the trial court. The habeas

records have been properly forwarded to this Court by the district clerk pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P.

73.4(b)(5). However, the records have been forwarded without the trial court having resolved the

designated issues in these cases. We remand these applications to the Criminal District Court No.

6 of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter
findings of fact and conclusions of law.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. 

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. Supplemental transcripts containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: July 24, 2019

Do not publish
#### Julian HEICKLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY,* New York City Police Commissioner, Jason Toala, Police Officer Shield # 27613, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1251-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 9, 2011.

Julian Heicklen, pro se, Teaneck, NJ.

Scott Schorr, Julie Steiner, for Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Appellees.

PRESENT: GUIDO CALABRESI, RICHARD C. WESLEY, GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The original complaint listed "Robert Kelly” as a defendant, but the New York City Police Commissioner’s actual name is "Raymond Kelly,” and the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the official caption accordingly.

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Julian Heicklen, proceeding *pro se,*appeals the district court’s judgment granting the defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment and denying Heicklen’s cross-motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We review an order granting summary judgment *de novo*and ask whether the district court properly concluded that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *See Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.,*321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003). In determining whether there are genuine issues of material fact, we are “required to resolve all ambiguities and draw all permissible factual inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought.” *Terry v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 128, 137 (2d Cir.2003) (quotation marks omitted). However, “conclusory statements or mere allegations [are] not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion.” *Davis v. New York,*316 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir.2002).

*458Having conducted an independent and *de novo*review of the record in light of these principles, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned decision.

We have considered Heicklen’s other arguments on appeal and have found them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.