alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guadalupe Marco Antonio VILLARREAL-FUENTES, also known as Guadalupe Marco Villarreal-Fuentes, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41373

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guadalupe Marco Antonio Villarreal-Fuentes raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NOT RECOMMENDED F OR F ULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Na me: 13a0581n.06 No. 12-6147 UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS F OR THE S IXTH CIRCUIT UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v. RI CKY HUGH ES, Def endant- Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DI STRI CT OF TEN

NESSEE

BEF ORE: BOG GS and SUHRHEI NRI CH, Circuit J udg es; MURPHY, District J udg e. *

PER C URI AM. Ricky

Hug hes appe als his sentence

. Hug hes pleade d g uilty to be ing a felon in possession of a firea rm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g )(1) . The district cour t sentence d him to 37 mont hs in prison, to be followed by two year s of supervised rele ase. Whil e Hug hes was serving his term of supervised rele ase, a probation office r filed a petition in the di strict court, alleg ing that Hughe s v i olated the conditions of hi s supervised rele ase by participating in an arme d robber y and kidnapping , using marijuana , and failing to comply with the re q u i re m ents of his drug -treatment prog ram. The district court conducte d a revoc ation hear ing a nd deter mined that Hug hes committed the alleg ed violations. Ba sed on his Gra de A violation and his criminal history cate g ory of V, Hug hes’s g uidelines rang e of imprisonment was 30 to 37 m onths. He was subject, howeve r, to a statutory maxi mum

The Honora

ble Stephen J

. Murphy I I I , United States District J udg e for the Easter n District * of Michig an, sitting by

desig nation.No. 12-6147

United States v. Hughe

s sentenc e of 24 months, which becam e the g uidelines rang e. The district court revoke d Hug hes’s supervised r elea se and se ntence d him to 24 mont hs in prison. On appea l, Hug hes argues that his sentenc e is proce durally unrea sonable beca use the district

co u rt failed to consider the sentenc ing fac tors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and fa i l ed t o adequately explain the basis for the sentenc e. We r eview sentenc es imposed following revoc ation of supervised rele ase under an ab u s e- of-discr etion standard for rea sonablene ss, which has both a proce dural a

nd a subst antive component. United St ates v. Kontrol , 554 F.3d 1089, 1092 ( 6th Cir. 2009). A sentenc e may be proce durally unrea sonable wher e a district court fails t o co n s i d er the § 3553(a) fac tors or fails to adequa tely explain the chosen sentenc e. Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Hug hes’s sentence is proce durally rea sonable. In imposing t he sentence, the d i strict court considere d the applicable g uidelines rang e and explained that a signific ant sentenc e was nece ssary due to the number of violations, the serious nature o f Hughes’s conduct, and the fac t that he is a dang er to the public. The court was not require d to expli citly consider eac h of the § 3553(a) fac tors, and, g iven the straig htforwa rd nature of the case and the imposit ion of a within-guidelines sentenc e, the court’s expl anation of the s entenc e was sufficie nt. See United States v. Duane , 533 F.3d 441, 451-52 (6th Cir. 2008). Acc ording ly , we a ffirm the se ntence

.

-2-
NUMBERS 13-20-00211-CR; 13-20-00212-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

MANUEL REYNA CANTU

AND ARACELY GARZA CANTU, Appellants,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 105th District Court

of Kleberg County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justices Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva

Order Per Curiam

These causes are before the Court on appellants’ joint motion for extension of time 

to file the brief. These cases are consolidated for purposes of briefing, and appellants 

were previously granted five extensions to file the brief. 
2

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellants’ sixth motion for 

extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in these causes, 

is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellants’ joint motion for extension of time 

to file the brief should be granted with order. Further motions for extension of time will 

not be granted absent additional exigent circumstances.

Appellants’ joint motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby GRANTED, 

and the Honorable Jorge G. Aristotelidis and the Honorable Nancy Barohn, counsel for 

appellants, are hereby ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court on or 

before February 19, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

29th day of January, 2021.
# FY20_Q1

# FY20_Q2

# FY20_Q3

# FY20_Q4

# Serotypes - User Notes
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Carlos Alberini, President and Chief Operating Officer of Guess?, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|Date: April 1, 2008 |  | By: | /s/CARLOS ALBERINICarlos Alberini President and Chief Operating Officer
|------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Guess?, Inc. and will be retained by Guess?, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    (ii) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Partnership.
  By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz,President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas,Chief Financial Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp,.
General Partner of the Partnership
  
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Credit Management Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Alexander Gordon Jardin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






U /s/
      Alexander Gordon Jardin





Alexander
      Gordon Jardin


Chief
      Executive Officer


U August
      14, 2007
941 A.2d 686

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Rasheen ALLEN, Petitioner.

No. 158 EM 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 4, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2008, the Motion for Exten[s]ion of Time to File Allowance of Appeal and the Application for Appointment of Counsel are granted. The Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court is directed to appoint counsel to represent Rasheen Allen. Appointed counsel is directed to file a petition for allowance of appeal within 60 days of the date of the common pleas court’s order appointing counsel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1999 and the audited consolidated
statement of income for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000912264
<NAME>                        10-K405
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               9,660
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       53,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (1,114)
<INVENTORY>                                            278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    74,497
<PP&E>                                           1,636,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (513,715)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,227,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               72,715
<BONDS>                                            555,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               402
<OTHER-SE>                                         498,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,227,087
<SALES>                                            290,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   302,606
<CGS>                                               66,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      266,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35,690
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 21,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        21,414
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .53


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Louis D.
Paolino, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Mace Security International, Inc.,
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Form 10-K of Mace Security International, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "December 31, 2003 Form 10-K"), which this certification
accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information
contained in the December 31, 2003 Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mace Security
International, Inc.


Dated: March 11, 2004
                                                       /s/ Louis D. Paolino, Jr.
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Louis D. Paolino, Jr.

* A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Unites States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service Board of Governors

# Times and Dates: 

1 p.m., Monday, March 5, 2001; 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, March 6, 2001; 10 a.m., Tuesday, March 6, 2001; and 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, March 7, 2001.

# Place: 

Washington, DC, U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

# Status: 

March 5 (Closed); March 6—8:30 a.m. (Open); March 6—10 a.m. (Closed); March 7 (Closed).

# Matters to be Considered:

 

#### Monday, March 5—1 p.m. (Closed)

1. Financial Performance.

2. Seattle, Washington, Processing and Distribution Center Upgrades.

3. Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Further Recommended Decision in Docket No. R2000-1.

4. Compensation Issues.

5. Personnel Matters.

#### Tuesday, March 6—8:30 a.m. (Open)

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, February 5-6, 2001.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer.

3. Fiscal Year 2000 Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations.

4. Report on Capital Metro Operations.

5. Tentative Agenda for the April 2-3, 2001, meeting in Chicago, Illinois.

#### Tuesday, March 6—10 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Planning.

#### Wednesday, March 7—8:30 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Planning.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

David G. Hunter, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

David G. Hunter,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4531  Filed 2-20-01; 1:58 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
USDA
elisa’

United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and November 27, 2019
Inspection Service

TRANSMITTED VIA FEDEX

1400 Independence

Averaie, SW John Chambers
Washington, D.C. : . 5
20250 Princeton University

RE: 2018-FSIS-00278-F
Noncompliance Reports

Dear Mr. Chambers:

This is the final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
request, dated April 17, 2018, to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food
Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). You requested access to a copy of all
noncompliance reports (NRs) stored in PHIS. We received your request in
our Office on April 17, 2018.

During our teleconference meeting on August 23, 2019, you amended your
request to include all noncompliance reports without descriptions in PHIS.

The FSIS FOIA staff works with subject matter experts across the agency
to locate responsive documents. For this request, we conducted a records
search in the Office of Planning, Analysis, and Risk Management
(OPARM). FSIS’ search began on April 17, 2018. Our search includes
responsive records in FSIS’ control on that date.

We have located nine Excel spreadsheets of responsive records pertaining
to your request. After a thorough review of the responsive records, we are
releasing these records in their entirety. Accordingly, this request is granted
in full.

Please be advised that your FOIA request, including your identity and the
information made available, is releasable to the public under any
subsequent FOIA requests. However, FSIS does not release your personal
privacy information, such as home addresses, telephone numbers, or Social
Security Numbers, all of which are protected from disclosure under FOIA
Exemption 6.

If you have any questions about the way this request was handled, please
contact April Harrid at 202-720-8215 or via email at

‘An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer


John Chambers
Page 2

April.Harrid@usda.gov. If you have general questions about FSIS’ FOIA procedures or
regulations, please contact me at 202-690-2760 or via email at
Arianne. Perkins@usda.gov.

Additionally, you may contact the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) at
the National Archives and Records Administration to inquire about the FOIA mediation
services they offer. The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of
Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601
Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov;
telephone at 202-741-5770; or facsimile at 202-741-5769.

Thank you for your interest in FSIS programs and policies.

Sincerely,
Digitally signed by ARIANNE

ARIANNE PERKINS eerkins
Date: 2019.11.27 13:02:21 -05'00'
Arianne M. Perkins
Director, Freedom of Information Act Staff
Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Education

Enclosure

Be Food Safe: CLEAN: Wash Hands and Surfaces Often SEPARATE: Separate Raw Meats from Other Foods
COOK: Cook To The Right Temperature CHILL: Refrigerate Food Promptly
THIRD
      AMENDMENT TO
ASSET
      PURCHASE AGREEMENT
OF
UNITED
      HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLC

    


    THIS
      THIRD AMENDMENT (“Amendment”)
      dated
      as of August 7, 2006, by and between UNITED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLC, a New
      York limited liability company having its principal place of business at 6
      Corporate Center Drive, Melville, New York (“Seller”),
      and
      BASIC CARE NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware corporation having its principal place
      of
      business at 4270 Promenade Way, Suite 226, Marina Del Rey, California 90292
      (“Buyer”),
      is an
      amendment to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 18, 2005
      by
      and among the Buyer and Seller (the “Agreement”).
      

    


    1.
       The
      parties mutually agree that Section 9(k) of the Agreement is hereby amended
      and
      restated to read in its entirety as follows: 

    


    “(k)
       Registration
      Statement Effective.
      The
      Registration Statement shall have become effective under the Securities Act
      and
      no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement shall
      have been issued and no proceedings for that purpose shall have been initiated
      or threatened by the SEC; provided, however, that in the event (i) the
      Registration Statement shall not have been filed with the SEC on or before
      March
      15, 2006, or (ii) the Registration Statement shall not have been declared
      effective on or before October 16, 2006, the Seller shall have the right, in
      its
      sole discretion, to terminate this Agreement without cost or
      penalty.”

     

    


     

    [Remainder
      of Page Left Blank Intentionally]


     


    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
      executed and delivered in the manner legally binding upon them as of the date
      first above written.

     

    
      	
              BASIC
                CARE NETWORKS, INC.

            	 	 	UNITED HEALTHCARE
MANAGEMENT, LLC, by
              SJB
Ventures, Inc., a Member 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By: 
/s/
              Robert Goldsamt	 	 	By:
              /s/ Stuart
              Blumberg
	
              
                

              

              Name:
                Robert Goldsamt

              Title:
                Chief Executive Officer

            	 	 	
              
                

              

              Name:
                Stuart Blumberg

              Title:
                Authorized Signatory