alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1

          SUMMARY OF 2006 ANNUAL BONUS PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND
                        CERTAIN KEY MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES

         On August 3, 2006, the Compensation  Committee (the "Committee") of the
Board of Directors of Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc. (the "Company") and the
Board of Directors of the Company  established  the target bonus amounts and the
performance  criteria  applicable to the Company's 2006 bonus plan for executive
officers and certain key management employees (the "Bonus Plan").

         The Bonus Plan is designed to promote the  interests of the Company and
its stockholders by providing  employees with financial rewards upon achievement
of specified  business  objectives,  as well as helping the Company  attract and
retain key employees.

         All of the  Company's  vice  presidents,  senior  vice  presidents  and
executive  officers,  including  all  of the  "named  executive  officers,"  are
eligible to participate in the Bonus Plan.

         Bonuses payable to executive officers under the Bonus Plan are based on
a  formula  that  takes  into  account  the  Company's   attainment  of  certain
performance  goals  (the  "Performance  Goals")  and  the  achievement  by  vice
presidents  and senior vice  presidents of certain  individual  objectives  (the
"MBOs").

         The  Company  has  established  Performance  Goals with  respect to the
following measures of operating performances (the "Performance Factors"):

            o     the  ratio  of  total  medical  expenses  to  revenue  for the
                  Company's  provider  service  network (the "PSN") business for
                  2006;

            o     the PSN  segment's  income  before  taxes and after  allocated
                  overhead;

            o     the  year  end  membership   level  of  the  Company's  health
                  maintenance organization (the "HMO"); and

            o     the  aggregate of the HMO's  membership  for each month during
                  the fiscal year.

         A designated  percentage of each  employee's  bonus is  attributable to
their or other employees  attainment of various MBOs and the Company's  relative
success meeting various established  milestones with respect to each Performance
Factor.

         In the event that the Company achieves the target threshold for each of
the Performance Factors and the MBOs satisfied by the vice presidents and senior
vice presidents,  on average, exceed a target level, the executive officers will
be  entitled  to receive a bonus  equal to 42% of base  salary.  Actual  bonuses
payable may be as high as 80% of base salary or as low as zero  depending on the
Company's level of success with respect to the Performance Factors.

         Bonuses  pursuant to the Bonus Plan are anticipated to be paid once the
Company  completes  the audit of its  financial  statements  for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2015

d1019 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2015

148244

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148244

COA: 316807

Marquette CC: 12

- 050513

- FH

USAMAH CARSWELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 29, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending t he decision in People v

Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on

July 29, 2015, 498 Mich 358 (2015), the application is again considered. Pursuant to

MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we RE MAND this case to the

Marquette Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially

different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge . On remand,

the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial

court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,

however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence

absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 3.3
                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

                                       OF

                          FIRST AVIATION SERVICES INC.

 Pursuant to Section 103(f) of Title 8 of the Delaware Code of 1953, as Amended


         I, the undersigned, being duly elected Secretary of First Aviation
Services Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DO HEREBY CERTIFY:

         RESOLVED, that in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this
Corporation, the par value per share of authorized shares of Common Stock was
inadvertently set forth incorrectly and that the first sentence of the first
paragraph of Article IV should be corrected by changing it to read as follows:


                                   ARTICLE IV.
                                  CAPITAL STOCK

         The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation shall
have the authority to issue is 30,000,000, of which (i) 25,000,000 shares shall
be Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), and (ii)
5,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the
"Preferred Stock").

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 4th day
of March, 1997.



                                          -----------------------------
                                          John A. Marsalisi
                                          Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          64,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,692
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       5,301,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                 279,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,895,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      3,681,984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    292,912
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,011,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,895,910<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               747,704
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  416,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             202,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                   134,663
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            134,663
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,521)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99
<FN>
<F1>The Company does not report using a classified balance sheet.
<F2>Includes limited partners interest in the Operating Partnership of $640,283.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2746

AN ACT

To amend the White House Conference on Small

Business Authorization Act.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2746

AN ACT

To amend the White House Conference on Small Business

Authorization Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the White House Conference on Small Business Au4 thorization Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is amended—

5 (1) in section 2 by striking from subsection (a)

6 ‘‘not earlier than January 1, 1994, and not later

7 than April 1, 1994’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof

8 ‘‘not earlier than May 1, 1995, and not later than

9 September 30, 1995’’;
2

HR 2746 EH

1 (2) in section 2 by striking from subsection (a)

2 ‘‘December 1, 1992’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof

3 ‘‘March 1, 1994’’;

4 (3) in section 5 by striking the second sentence

5 of subsection (a) and by inserting in lieu thereof the

6 following: ‘‘Subsequent to the date of enactment of

7 this Act, but not later than 30 days after the date

8 of enactment of this Act, the President shall select

9 and appoint eleven individuals to the Commission.’’;

10 and

11 (4) in section 9 by striking from subsection (a)

12 ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof

13 ‘‘$7,000,000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
[No. 35520-5-II.

Division Two.

September 11, 2007.]

#### Don Taylor et al., *Appellants,*v. Vicki Martin et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 04-2-00217-3, John R. Hickman, J., entered October 17, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong and QuinnBrintnall, JJ.
Justifiable 

Documentation 

Justification 

Thought Process 

Intensified Verification Testing 7/27/09

1

1

2

• Justify why you selected the sample 

site

• Support your selection

• Develop a thought process

2

3

• Gather information by asking

questions

• Assess the information

• Determine site selection

A logical sequence to arrive at a 

sound, supportable conclusion

3

1
 

 

 

 

Documentation 

Intensified Verification Testing 7/27/09

Justification

Documenting your justification will help:

• others understand why you did what

you did

• you remember why you selected a 

specific site over another location

4

Justification

4

Documenting your justification will 

help:

• future efforts atthat plant and

other establishments

• others learning how to do IVTs

• strengthen any legal concerns

5

5

Document your justification

• Link your site selection to other

documents

• Other documents may help support

your decision

• Associated noncompliances show how

issues are interrelated

6

6

2
 

 

I 

-

I 

-

Intensified Verification Testing 7/27/09

Information Sources

You may use various sources to help you

determine the sample site

• In-plant data generated by the plant

• NRs

• Food safety assessments

• Previous analyses results

• Verification plans 7

7

8

8

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                         724,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,669,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                   924,285
<INVENTORY>                                  1,504,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,592,942
<PP&E>                                         693,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,788,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,969,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,182,790
<COMMON>                                    35,221,611
<OTHER-SE>                                (39,319,699)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,788,759
<SALES>                                     24,492,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,492,403
<CGS>                                       15,851,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,460,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (265,160)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (430,968)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,453,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,453,030
<DISCONTINUED>                                 219,998
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,233,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

EnergySolutions, Inc.  Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The following table sets forth all subsidiaries of the Company, other than subsidiaries that, when considered in the aggregate, would
not constitute a significant subsidiary, including the percentage of issued and outstanding voting securities beneficially owned by the Company:

EnergySolutions, LLC, a Utah limited liability company


100.00
%BNG America, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


100.00
%BNG America Savannah River Corp., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%EnergySolutionsSpent Fuel Division, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%Manufacturing Sciences Corp., a Colorado corporation


100.00
%EnergySolutionsCompany, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%Duratek, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%Duratek Services, Inc., a Tennessee corporation


100.00
%EnergySolutionsEU Ltd., a company incorporated in England and Wales


100.00
%Reactor Sites Management Company Ltd., a company incorporated in England and Wales


100.00
%Magnox North, Ltd., a company incorporated in England and Wales


100.00
%Magnox South, Ltd., a company incorporated in England and Wales


100.00
%Safeguard International Solutions, Ltd., a company incorporated in England and Wales


100.00
%EnergySolutionsFederal EPC, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%EnergySolutionsFederal Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%EnergySolutionsFederal Services of Hanford, Inc., a Delaware


100.00
%Isotek Systems, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company


45.00
%Parallax, Inc., a Georgia corporation


100.00
%Uranium Disposition Services, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company


26.00
%GTSD Sub IV, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%Chem Nuclear, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


100.00
%EnergySolutionsCanada Corporation, an Ontario corporation


100.00
%Hittman Transport Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%EnergySolutionsDiversified Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100.00
%


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Retirement Villas Properties II, a California limited partnership (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Jessee, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Mark Jessee                                                                           
|                                                                                             
|Mark Jessee Chief Financial
Officer of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. its Managing General
Partner



November 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 99N-1852]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Postmarketing Studies for Approved Human Drug and Licensed 
Biological Products; Status Reports

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Postmarketing Studies for Approved 
Human Drug and Licensed Biological Products; Status Reports'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of October 30, 2000 
(65 FR 64607), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0433. 
The approval expires on February 29, 2004. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: February 22, 2001.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 01-4853 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>  
          THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
          THE  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEETS  AND  CONSOLIDATED   STATEMENTS  OF
          OPERATIONS  FOUND ON PAGES 1, 2 AND 3 OF THE  COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR
          THE  YEAR-TO-DATE,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
          SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         (90,118)
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,128,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (89,296)
<INVENTORY>                                    3,231,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,377,598
<PP&E>                                         4,782,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,655,459)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,625,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,645,549
<BONDS>                                        2,574,251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       55,406
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,350,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,625,993
<SALES>                                        7,841,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,841,139
<CGS>                                          6,569,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,569,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,274,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (153,261)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (104,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (104,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (104,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        

</TABLE>
USDA/FSIS Enterprise Governance High-Level Initiative Decision Tree

Triage 

IT-related? 

Yes 

No 

Use Non-IT or ITRelated Standard 

or Emergency 

Process 

Yes PHIS- or 

PHDCIS-related? 

New Initiative or 

Significant 

Enhancement? 

Yes 

Use IT- or ITRelated Non-Major 

Standard or 

Emergency Process 

No No 

Use New IT- or ITRelated Major 

Below Threshold 

Standard or 

Emergency Process 

Mission Needs 

Statement 

Complete? 

Yes 

No 

Submitter Must 

Complete/Revise 

and Resubmit 

Yes EG Form: New/ Revised Need? 

Meets EG Criteria? 

Ready to Submi

to USDA 

Initiation 

Decision Gate 

Review? 

No (fo

subseq

Yes USDA Approved 

to Move to 

Design Review 

Decision Gate? 

USDA Approved 

to Move to 

Development 

& Test Review 

Decision Gate? 

USDA Approved 

to Move to 

Implementation 

Review 

Decision Gate? 

Yes 

Use USDA 

Design 

Approval 

Process 

Use USDA 

Development 

& Test 

Approval 

Process 

Use USDA 

Implementation 

Approval 

Process 

Yes 

Use USDA 

Requirements 

Approval 

Process 

USDA Approved 

to Move to 

Operations, 

Maintenance & 

Disposition 

Decision Gate? 

Use USDA 

Operation, 

Maintenance & 

Disposition 

Approval 

Process 

Yes 

Refer to Agency EG 

Processes 

No* No* 

No* 

No*
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2745

For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1993

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

4 The time limitations set forth in section 3744(b) of

5 title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with respect

6 to the awarding of the medal of honor to Wayne T.

7 Alderson of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in recognition of

8 acts performed at the risk of his life and beyond the call

9 of duty while serving as a private first class in the United

10 States Army in Germany during World War II.

Æ