alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 10 51 6 Non -Arg um en t Pane l

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 4 :0 8- cv -0 00 62 -CDL DENNIS RILEY, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t,
ve rs us
HARRIS C OUNTY SHERIFF’S DE PARTMENT, The , Jo in tl y

an d S ev eral ly, RYAN W ILLIAMSON, Dep ut y , Jo in tl y an d Sev eral ly, Defen da nt s- App el le es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Sep te m be r 14 , 20 10 ) Befo re CARNES, M ARCUS an d HILL, Ci rcu itJu dg es .PER CURI AM:

Den ni s R il ey

ap pe al s t he gra ntof s umm ary jud gm en t t o d efen da nt , Ry an W il li am s, o n R il ey ’s var io us Fo urth Am en dm en t cl ai m s b ro ug htpu rs ua ntto 42 U.S.C. § 1 98 3 i n c on ne ct io n wi th hi s arres t b y W il li am s. Ri le y

als o app eal s t he gr an t o f su m

m ary jud gm en t t o Wil li am s o n R il ey ’s st at e la w cla im forin te nt io na l in fli ct io n o f em ot io na l d is tre ss . The di stric t co urt g ran te d s umm ary jud gm en t t o Wil li am s af te r itco nc lu de d th atth e und is pu te d fa ct s i n t hi s ca se , tak eninth e li gh t m os t fa vo rab le to Ril ey , co nc lu si ve ly dem on st rat e th atW il li am s d idno t v io la te an y of R il ey ’s
co ns ti tu ti on al rig ht s dur in g t he co ur se of R il ey ’s arres t. The di st ric t co urt al so
co nc lu de d t ha t the re was no ev id en ce tha t Will ia m s ac te d wi th m al ic e dur in g t he
arre st , as re qu ire d u nd er Geo rg ialaw t o e st ab li sh a cl ai m forin te nt io na l i nf

li ct io n of em ot io na l d is tre ss . Ourrev ie w of the bri efs on ap pe al an d t he reco rdinth is cas e in di cat e n o
erro r inth e d is tri ctco urt’s an al y si s o f th e fac ts or app li cat io n o f th e la w to th os e fact s. Acco rd in gl y , th e jud gm en t o f th e d is tri ctco urt i s AFFIR MED.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2393 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2393

   To repeal the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1993

  Mr. DeLay (for himself, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Walker, Mr. 
Ramstad, Mr. Crane, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Fawell, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Oxley, 
 Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Lewis of Florida, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
 Cox, Mr. Packard, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Armey, Mr. Linder, Mr. Lightfoot, 
 Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Archer, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Coble, Mr. 
 Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Combest, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Hancock, Mr. Stump, 
 Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Hutchinson, 
Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Sundquist, Mr. McCandless, Mr. Miller of 
    Florida, Mr. Mica, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. McMillan, Mr. 
 Knollenberg, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Barrett of Nebraska, Mr. 
  Goss, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Porter, Mr. 
   Livingston, Mr. Allard, Mr. Kim, Mr. Hansen, and Mrs. Vucanovich) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON ACT.

    The Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 
276a et seq.)) is repealed.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boston Biomedica, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  “Report”), I, Kevin W. Quinlan, President, Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer ofBoston Biomedica, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), do herebycertify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 14, 2003 | */s/ Kevin W. Quinlan*                                         |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Kevin W.  Quinlan                                              |
|                    | President,  Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer              |
|                    | (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BostonBiomedica, Inc. and will be retained by Boston Biomedica, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### NUMBER 13
- 1 5
- 00 139
- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING , APPELLANT ,

v.
BERNARDINO PEDRAZO JR. , APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza , and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Texas Board of Nursing, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo C ounty, Texas, in cause number C

- 2541

- 10

- B. Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on grounds tha the parties have settled all issues relating to this appeal.2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the o pinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, t he court will tax costs against the appellant."). Pending motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
D elive red and filed the 1st day of September , 20 1 5

.
Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted

Pursuant to the No Fear Act: 

FSA (and below),FSA

For 3rd Quarter 2022 for period ending June 30, 2022

Complaint Activity

Comparative Data

Previous Fiscal Year Data

2022Thru06-30

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Number of Complaints Filed 33 35 27 27 22 13

Number of Complainants 31 35 26 27 21 10

Repeat Filers 2 0 1 0 1 3

Complaints by Basis Comparative Data

Previous Fiscal Year Data

2022Thru06-

30 Note: Complaints can be filed alleging 

multiple bases.The sum of the bases 

may not equal total complaints filed.

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Race 16 18 14 9 6 3

Color 6 8 6 2 3 0

Religion 2 3 3 2 1 2

Reprisal 19 19 13 12 5 5

Sex 15 23 11 12 7 2

PDA 0 0 0 1 1 0

National Origin 3 4 2 0 0 0

Equal Pay Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

------------

 

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)  December 5, 2003
 

Petroleum Development Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

Nevada                                0-7246                                95-2636730

(State or Other Jurisdiction	(Commission		 (IRS Employer

of Incorporation)	File Number) 	Identification No.)

103 East Main Street; Bridgeport, WV    26330

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code    304-842-3597
no change

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5.	Other Events.

	On December 5, 2003, the Company issued a news release announcing the closing of the fourth 2003 drilling program. The news releases are filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

	On December 5, 2003, the Company issued a news release announcing the closing of its fourth 2003 drilling program. The news releases are filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

	Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

                                                    

Petroleum Development Corporation

 

Date  December 8, 2003             

 

By  /s/ Darwin L. Stump                                   
        Darwin L. Stump

        Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
             the quarter ended  December  30,  1998  Form  10-Q  Balance  Sheets
             and Statements of Operations  and is  qualified  in its entirety by
             reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>       0000830159
<NAME>  American Tax Credit Properties, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
<CURRENCY>          US DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1.00
<CASH>                                                        597
<SECURITIES>                                                4,041
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  65
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             18,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,249
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               18,293
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              263
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,940)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (34.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THEODORE J. NEWTON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

S. EATMON, Correctional Officer,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

T. VILLANUEVA, SSA, Appeals

Coordinator,

Defendant. No. 19

- 56478

D.C. No. 3:19

- cv

- 00511

- LAB

KSC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 2 , 2020 * *

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Theodore J. Newton appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel una nimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 56478

court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino v. Baca , 747 F.3d 1162,

1168 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc)

. We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Newton

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and failed to raise a genuine dispute

of material fact as to whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable

to him. See Woodfor

d v. Ngo , 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of

administrative remedies

. . . means using all steps that the agency holds out, and

doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (citation

and internal quotation marks omitted)) ; McKinney v. Carey , 311 F.3d 1198, 1 199

-

1200 (9th Cir. 2002) (requiring inmates to exhaust administrative remedies prior to

filing suit in federal court)

.

We treat the judgment as a dismissal without prejudice to Newton refiling

the action. See McKinney , 311 F.3d at 1200

- 01.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1429
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus REX PLANT, Defendant - Appellant, and COLLEEN BOSSIER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:05-cv-01653-RDB) Submitted: January 23, 2008 Decided: February 7, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas DeCaro, DECARO & HOWELL, PC, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel J. Tobin, BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Rex Plant appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment and awarding damages in favor of Ameriquest Mortgage in its efforts to collect payment on a residential mortgage loan. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Plant , No. 1:05-cv01653-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2007, and Mar. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Mark Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.



Dated: 11/13/03                            /s/Mark Meriwether
      ---------                            ----------------------------
                                           Mark Meriwether
                                           President, CEO, Secretary/Treasurer
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2628

For the relief of Marlene Anita Hudson.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1993

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Marlene Anita Hudson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall, out of any

4 money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise

5 appropriated, pay to Marlene Anita Hudson of Washing6 ton, District of Columbia, a lump-sum payment in the

7 amount of $38,400.

8 (b) It shall be unlawful for any amount in excess of

9 10 percent of the lump-sum payment designated in sub10 section (a) to be paid to or received by any agent or attor11 ney in consideration for services rendered in connection
2

•HR 2628 IH

1 with such lump-sum payment. Any person who violates the

2 preceding sentence shall be fined not more than $1,000.

3 (c) The amount payable under this Act shall be in

4 addition to any other amount which (if this Act had not

5 been enacted) would otherwise be payable under any other

6 provision of law based on the death of James A. Hudson.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> 0

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00                    1.00
<CASH>                                          82,253                 125,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  335,771                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,750,531               2,539,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,180,498               2,673,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          565,573                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,614,925               2,673,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,180,498               2,673,346
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,351                   5,151
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,311                  18,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,960)                (13,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,960)                (13,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,960)                (13,606)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SHAWN BURKE,

Respondent

v.

KRISTI TRUESDELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 105 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of August, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
2009-1375.

#### State Road Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Falls.

Summit App. No. 24362, 2009-Ohio-2859.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of CEO and CFO


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Crystallex International Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Gordon M. Thompson, as President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Registrant, and Hemdat Sawh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.








/s/
      Gordon M. ThompsonName:
            Gordon
      M. ThompsonTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            March
      31, 2008








/S/
      HEMDAT SAWHName:
            Hemdat
      SawhTitle:
            Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            March
      31, 2008








This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.