alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 11**               **Year ended December 31,**   **2004**  **2003**  **2002** Basic:            Weighted average shares outstanding  13,679,604   12,414,816   12,630,964            Net loss:            Loss before cumulative effect ofchange in accounting principle $(6,410) $(3,533) $(57)Cumulative effect of change in accountingprinciple  —   —   (5,733)           Net loss $(6,410) $(3,533) $(5,790)           Basic loss per share:            Loss before cumulative effect ofchange in accounting principle $(0.47) $(0.28) $— Cumulative effect of change in accountingprinciple  —   —   (0.46)          Total $(0.47) $(0.28) $(0.46)           Diluted:            Weighted average shares outstanding  13,679,604   12,414,816   12,630,964  Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrantsbased on the treasury stock methodusing the year-end market price, ifhigher than average market price  —   —   —            Total  13,679,604   12,414,816   12,630,964            Net loss:            Loss before cumulative effect ofchange in accounting principle $(6,410) $(3,533) $(57)Cumulative effect of change in accountingprinciple  —   —   (5,733)          Net loss $(6,410) $(3,533) $(5,790)           Diluted loss per share:            Loss before cumulative effect ofchange in accounting principle $(0.47) $(0.28) $— Cumulative effect of change in accountingprinciple  —   —   (0.46)          Total $(0.47) $(0.28) $(0.46)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JULY 31, 1999 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,886
<SECURITIES>                                       791
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                       991
<INVENTORY>                                     24,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,312
<PP&E>                                         227,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              139
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,886
<SALES>                                        353,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               354,502
<CGS>                                          333,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  342,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    88
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    598
<INCOME-TAX>                                       264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       334
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
2009-1717.

#### State v. Jobe.

Lucas App. No. L-07-1413, 2009-Ohio-4066.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-233-000]

Take notice that on February 21, 2001, Questar Pipeline Company (Questar) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A, the tariff sheets as listed on Appendix A to the filing, to be effective March 23, 2001.

Due to a change in Questar's management personnel, changes were proposed to modify the reference to the person by whom Questar's tariff has been issued. In addition, miscellaneous tariff “clean-up” revisions were made.

Questar states that a copy of this filing has been served upon its customers, the Public Service Commission of Utah, and the Public Service Commission of Wyoming.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-5100  Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 11043 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket N o. 4:17

- c r

- 00091

- LGW

- GRS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CEDRIC AUSTIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________ (November 21, 2018)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM : The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F .3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of

Case: 18-11043 Date Filed: 11/21/2018 Page: 1 of 22 the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or
even blatant error).

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED. Case: 18-11043 Date Filed: 11/21/2018 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Disaboom Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                                                             
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 20, 2008 | By /s/ J.W. Roth
     J.W. Roth, Principal Executive Officer

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2064

BARRY P. GRASS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
KAREN L. GRASS; JAMES L. GRASS; JENNIFER L. GRASS; MICHAEL R. GRASS, Plaintiffs,

versus EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee,
and
NOHL A. BRAUN, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:05-cv-00496) Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 27, 2007- 2 - Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry P. Grass, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Ellen Hauptfuehrer, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia; Thomas John Hurney, Jr., Erin R. Stankewicz, JACKSON & KELLY, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Barry P. Grass appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and denying relief in his civil action alleging claims against his former employer and physician. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grass v. Eastern Assoc. Coal. Co. , No. 2:05-cv-00496 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2006; filed Aug. 28, 2006 & entered Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




CFO Certification. In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Aviation
Services Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael D. Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Michael D. Davidson
Chief Financial Officer
September 10, 2002



                                       17
<PAGE>
rom 943A Agricultural Employer’s Record of cM No. 1545-0088

(August 1982) = pee, .
Department of the Treasury Federal Tax Liability Expires 8-31-85
Internal Revenue Service

Name as shown on Form 943 Employer identification number

Attach this form (or a statement giving the same information) to Form 943 if your tax liability for any month during the year is $3,000 or
more. If you use this form, do not complete lines A through L on Form 943. Write the total tax liability for the year (line V) on line M of Form
943. See rule (4) under ‘“‘Deposit Rules” on page 4 of Form 943 and in section 10 of Circular A for more information.

Each month is divided into eight deposit periods that end on the 3rd, 7th, 11th, 15th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, and last day of the month. If your
tax liability for any month is $3,000 or more, find the eighth-monthly periods below during which you had paydays during that month’ and
make entries on the lines next to those periods. For example, if you pay wages on the Ist and 15th of each month, complete lines A, D, |, L, Q,
and T for each quarter. If your taxes for any month are $500 or more but less than $3,000, you can show your tax liability on the total line for
the month (I, Il, or Ill).

The total tax liability for the year (line V) must equal net taxes on Form 943 (line 9). Otherwise, you may be charged a penalty, based
on your average tax liability, for not making deposits of taxes. (The dates and amounts of your deposits are now obtained from your Federal
tax deposit forms.)

Tax Liability
Date wages paid: First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
January April July October

First month of quarter:
Ast through 3dday . . . 1.
4th through 7thday. . . 2.
8th through 11th day
12th through 15th day . .
16th through 19thday. . . . . .
20th through 22d day . . . - + ©
23d through 25th day
26th through last day .

ron ScOBD

v

1 First month total... +. I
Second month of quarter: February May August November
Ast through 3d day. . «ss ee
4th through 7th day. . toe
8th through llthday. . . 2 2.
12th through 15th day. .
16th through 19th day .
20th through 22d day tone
23d through 25thday . 2 2 . ee
26th through last day . . 2 2.

wOoOZEzrxAecn—

Il Second month total - . . . I
Third month of quarter:

Ast through 3d day . 2. 2 ee
4th through 7thday. . . 2. -
Sththroughllthday. . . . . «
12th through 15th day... 1 we
16th through 19thday . 2. 2 ee
20th through 22d day... 1.
23d through 25thday . . . 1.
26th through last day . . .

March June September December

<xS<canwo V

ll Third month totale 2... + WD

IV Total for quarter (add lines |, II, and III)

V_ Total for year (enter here and on line M of Form 943)... we ee ee
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see Form 943 instructions. Form 943A (8-82)
363-275-1 ‘¥e US, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 198~0-363-275
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel Rooney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: October 28, 2005


                                        /s/ Daniel Rooney
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Daniel Rooney
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer of
                                        Superconductive Components, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  203,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    333,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               537,926
<PP&E>                                         461,418
<DEPRECIATION>                               (360,027)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 641,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,218,510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       536,396
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,761,334)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   641,167
<SALES>                                        291,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,602
<CGS>                                          201,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ChasePackaging Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part ofthe Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filingof the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 
|                    |                                            |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| November 12,  2010 | /s/  Allen T. McInnes                           |
|                    | Allen  T. McInnes                               |
|                    | Chairman of the Board,  President and Treasurer |
|                    | (Principal Executive  Officer)                  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.









/s/David Salzman


David Salzman


Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax


Credit Properties Inc., general partner of


Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general


partner of the Registrant


August 9, 2012
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7765

FRANK E. GREEN,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

J. PRITTS, CO II; J. GORDON, CO III; R. RITCHIE, CO II; 

CHRIST WEDLOCK, CO III,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-00868-JFM)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Edward Green, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frank Edward Green seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying 

his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s final order was entered on the docket 

on September 24, 2015. The notice of appeal was filed on

October 28, 2015.* Because Green failed to file a timely notice 

of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).
3

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED