alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Billy Ray LOCKLEAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT, Regional Director; David Mitchell, Facility Administrator; Mike Slagle, 3rd in Command; Chris Moody, Captain; Robert Guy, Captain; Rodney Bennett, Sergeant; Victoria Sellers, Sergeant; Brenda Zimmerman, Sergeant; Travis Sparks, Sergeant; Richard Jobe, Sergeant; Carolyn Winfield; Kevin Benfield, Unit Manager; Jason Garland, Officer; Donna Gibson, Officer; Burtchfield, Officer; Beavers, Officer; Margie Lawler, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-6651.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 12, 2011.

Decided: Feb. 2, 2011.

Billy Ray Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy Locklear, a North Carolina prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing Locklear’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (2006) for failure to demonstrate complete exhaustion of administrative remedies. Locklear represented to the district court that he had not fully exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to one of his claims. Because dismissal of the entire complaint is not required when the prisoner has failed to exhaust some, but not all, of the claims included in his complaint, *Jones v. Bock,*549 U.S. 199, 220-24, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007), we va*653cate the decision of the district court and remand for further proceedings. We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument will not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. RP00-477-000, RP01-18-000 and RP01-81-000]

                    Take notice that a settlement conference to discuss the various issues raised by Tennessee's Order No. 637 filing in Docket No. RP00-477-000,                     *et al.*                     will be held on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, at 9:00 am, in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

All interested parties are permitted to attend the settlement conference.

                    Upon conclusion of the settlement conference, take notice that a technical conference to discuss the various issues raised by Tennessee's Order No. 637 filing in Docket No. RP00-477-000,                     *et al.*                     will be held in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend the technical conference.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-5098  Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Supplement
Contract





The
Seller (hereinafter referred as “Party A”): Hainan Zhonghe Pharmaceutical
Co., Ltd.






Legal
Representative: Cui Xueyun




Address:
No.168 Nanhai Street, Haikou, Free Trade Zone


Post
      Code: 570216
                Tel:
      0898-66822833





The Buyer
(hereinafter referred as “Party B”): Hainan Twenty First Media Co.,
Ltd.




Legal
Representative: Weiqiong




Address:
Fortune Plaza, Binhai Street, Haikou




Post
Code: 570102


Through
friendly consultation between both parties, to ensure better performance of
“Property Sale and Purchase Contract” (hereinafter referred as “Original
Contract”) signed on October 9, 2008, it is agreed by both parties to revise the
Original Contract as following:
 
   1
  Article 1
The Article 10 about taxes and fees relating to transfer of property in Original
Contract is revised as: Party B shall be in charge go through transfer
procedures and Party A shall assist actively. Taxes and fees incurred hereby
shall be paid by Party B.
 
 Article 2
Article 3 in Original Contract regarding price is revised as: calculated by
building area, the sale price of that property is RMB17500 Yuan per squatter
meter, the total amount is RMB16,234,750.00 Yuan only.
 
 Article 3
Matters unmentioned in this Supplement Contract, if any, may be regulated
separately through negotiation by both parties and supplemented agreement may be
signed hereto, which has equal effect to this Supplement and Original
Contract.
 
 Article 4
The two parties shall consult with each other and mediate any disputes, which
may arise about the contract. If all attempts fail, the two parties can appeal
to the organization of arbitration in Haikou and ask for a final
arbitration.
 
 Article 5
This contract is in four copies with equal effect to Original Contract, will
come into effect on the date of signature.
 
   2
 
 Party A
(Chop): Hainan Zhonghe Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
 
 Representative:
 
 Party B
(Chop): Hainan Twenty First Media Co., Ltd.
 
 Representative:
 
  Singed in
Haikou City on October 27, 2008
 
  3
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**




Certifications





I,
      Wang,
      Xiao Jun, Chief Financial Officer certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dark Dynamite,
      Inc.





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





a)
      All
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply);
      and





b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which
      do
      not apply); and





Date:
      November 14, 2006








/s/
      Wang, Xiao Jun


Wang,
      Xiao Jun
France - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Meat to the United States

February 13. 2024

EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted

14752020 Broceliande - ALH (Processing & Cold Storage) 07/27/2021

24053001 Sobeval (Slaughter & Cold Storage) 12/06/2016

24550009 Stef Logistique Midi Pyrenees Limousin (Cold Storage) 12/06/2017

29225001 Jean Henaff SAS (Slaughter, Processing & Cold Storage) 03/21/2008

64063004 Pyragena (Processing & Cold Storage) 01/13/2015

64305002 Fipso Industrie (Slaughter & Cold Storage) 06/19/2014

65284001 SA Salaisons De L'Adour (Processing & Cold Storage) 12/06/2017

76066001 Sysco France SAS (Cold Storage) 01/09/2019

79246002 Cooperlarc Atlantique (Slaughter & Cutting) 12/06/2017

79246003 Sofrimaix (Cold Storage) 12/06/2017

`

Page 1
**Exhibit 32.3**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis R. Secor,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Guess?, Inc. (the “Company”),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

·       theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

·       the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

| Date: February 28, 2007 | By:    | /s/ DENNIS R. SECOR                                |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Dennis R. Secor                                    |
|                         |   | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Guess?, Inc. and will be retained by Guess?, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O . 09

- 23

- 00 395

- CV

__________________

LARRISA PAYTON , Appellant

V.

MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E

- 20 9409

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In response to a late brief notice from the Clerk of the Court, Larrisa Payton

,

Appellant, filed a request to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Appel lant requested a dismissal before the appellate court issued a decision in the

appeal. We grant the request and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).2 APPEAL DISM I SSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 1 5 , 2024

Opinion Delivered May 16, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
----

***NEWS   FROM ***

**        Petroleum        Development Corporation**

**FOR        IMMEDIATE RELEASE:**

**CONTACT:**

**Petroleum        Development Corporation Re-Elects Two **
**Directors at 2007 Annual        Meeting of Shareholders**

**Bridgeport,        West Virginia...**

**120        Genesis Boulevard • P. O. Box 26 • Bridgeport, West Virginia •Phone:  (304)        842-3597**
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Henry MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40175

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 2011.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Scott Matthew Ellison, Esq., Law Office of Scott M. Ellison, P.L.L.C., Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Henry Munoz appeals the 151-month sentence he received following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent tó distribute 1,084.4 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Munoz argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure, pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 5K2.12, maintaining his contention that he provided false testimony at his co-defendant’s trial under duress as a result of his co-defendant’s threats against the lives of his family members.

This court lacks jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure motion made pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12 unless the district court held a mistaken belief that it lacked authority to depart. *United States v. Lucas,*516 F.3d 316, 350-51 (5th Cir.2008); *United States v. Hernandez,*457 F.3d 416, 424 (5th Cir.2006). Munoz does not argue, and the record does not indicate, that the district court in this case mistakenly believed it was not authorized to grant the motion. Consequently, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion. *See Lucas,*516 F.3d at 350-51; *United States v. Buck,*324 F.3d 786, 797-98 (5th Cir.2003).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: November 15, 2010                                                   /s/ Wanwen Su
 Wanwen Su
 President, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer, Controller
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 233

To apply certain provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to a segment

of the North Fork of the Payette River in Idaho.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. LAROCCO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To apply certain provisions of the Wild and Scenic Rivers

Act to a segment of the North Fork of the Payette

River in Idaho.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROTECTION OF THE NORTH FORK PAYETTE

4 RIVER.

5 In order to protect for present and future generations

6 the outstanding scenic, natural, and recreational values of

7 the North Fork of the Payette River between Cabarton

8 Bridge and Banks in the State of Idaho, the protections

9 afforded by section 7(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers

10 Act (16 U.S.C. 1278(a)) for rivers designated under sec-
2

•HR 233 IH

1 tion 3(a) of that Act shall apply to the 25-mile segment

2 of such river downstream of Cabarton Bridge and up3 stream of the confluence of the river with the South Fork

4 of the Payette at Banks.

Æ
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2461

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services

Act of 1949 to authorize the transfer to States of surplus

personal property for donation to nonprofit providers

of necessaries to impoverished families and individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2461 EH

1 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY

2 FOR DONATION TO PROVIDERS OF NEC3 ESSARIES TO IMPOVERISHED FAMILIES AND

4 INDIVIDUALS.

5 Section 203(j)(3)(B) of the Federal Property and

6 Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C.

7 484(j)(3)(B)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘homeless in8 dividuals’’ the following: ‘‘, providers of assistance to fami9 lies or individuals whose annual incomes are below the

10 poverty line (as that term is defined in section 673 of the

11 Community Services Block Grant Act),’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1994.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2461

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative

ished families and individuals.to nonprofit providers of necessaries to impoverStates of surplus personal property for donationServices Act of 1949 to authorize the transfer to
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0042

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOHNATHAN ALBERT BERTSCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including April 16, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 13 2024

03/13/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0042
Exhibit 23.2

              INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Hollywood Media's consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2001 included in this Form 10-K report for fiscal 2003
have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as
stated in their report contained in this Form 10-K report, and such financial
statements are incorporated into the following registration statements filed
with the SEC by Hollywood Media, on the authority of Arthur Andersen LLP as
experts in giving that report: Registration Statement File Nos. 333-21173,
333-38219, 333-57855, 333-68209, 333-14659, 333-48380, 333-45098, 333-62152 and
333-64262 (collectively, the "Registration Statements"). In accordance with SEC
rules, the report of Arthur Andersen LLP included in this 2003 Form 10-K is a
copy of Arthur Andersen LLP 's previously issued report, which has not been
reissued because Arthur Andersen LLP has ceased operations.

         Accordingly, because Arthur Andersen LLP has ceased operations, Arthur
Andersen LLP has not consented to the inclusion of its report in this Form 10-K
or to the incorporation of such report herein into the Registration Statements,
and we have dispensed with the requirement to file Arthur Andersen LLP 's
consent in reliance on Rule 437a under the Securities Act. Because Arthur
Andersen LLP has not consented to the inclusion of its report in this Form 10-K
or the incorporation of such report into the Registration Statements, a person
acquiring securities of Hollywood Media under any of the Registration Statements
will not be able to recover against Arthur Andersen LLP under Section 11 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for any untrue statements of a material fact
contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen LLP that have
been included in this Form 10-K or any omissions to state a material fact
required to be stated therein.
exv10w13



 






Exhibit 10.13




Vesting Acceleration and Severance Agreement




In consideration for the continued employment of ___(the “Employee”) at the executive
level within Hansen Medical (the “Company”):



In the event of an Acquisition of the Company (as defined below) and either a) the termination his
employment for other than Cause (as defined below) or b) the material change of his employment by
substantial dimunition in compensation or duties, or c) substantial relocation of his place of
work, Employee shall be entitled to the following:



     (i) Fifty percent (50%) of any then-unvested shares subject to stock options issued to
Employee shall become immediately vested;



     (ii) Employee shall receive three (3) months of severance payments based on Employee’s then
current annual salary compensation; and



     (iii) Employee shall receive three (3) months continuation of Employee’s then-current health,
dental, vision, and life/disability insurance benefits;



The following terms shall have the following definitions:



(i) An “Acquisition” shall mean a) any consolidation or merger of the Company with or into any
other corporation or entity or person in which the stockholders of the Company prior to such
consolidation, merger or reorganization shall own less than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock
of the continuing or surviving entity of such consolidation, merger or reorganization, b) any other
corporate reorganization in which in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the Company’s voting power is
transferred, or c) any transaction in which any person, together with its affiliates, accumulates
fifty percent (50%) or more of the Company’s voting power;



(ii) “Cause” shall mean (a) an intentional unauthorized use or disclosure of the Company’s
confidential information or trade secrets, which use or disclosure causes material harm to the
Company, (b) a material breach of any agreement between Employee and the Company, (c) a material
failure to comply with the Company’s written policies or rules, (d) conviction of, or plea of
“guilty” or “no contest” to, a felony under the laws of the United States or any state thereof, (e)
gross negligence or willful misconduct or (f) a continued failure to perform assigned duties after
receiving written notification of such failure from the Company’s Board of Directors.



Understood and Agreed:




	 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	[employee]

	 	          Date
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	Fred Moll, CEO

	 	Date