alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul D. Colasono, Chief Financial Officer of Franklin Credit Management (the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 16, 2005

                                             BY: /s/ Paul D. Colasono
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Name: Paul D. Colasono
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2647 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2647

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that the effective 
   date of any changes in benefits under the Servicemen's Group Life 
    Insurance program shall be based on the International Date Line.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 1993

 Mr. Kreidler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that the effective 
   date of any changes in benefits under the Servicemen's Group Life 
    Insurance program shall be based on the International Date Line.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR CHANGES IN SERVICEMEN'S GROUP LIFE 
              INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Use of International Date Line.--Section 1967 of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(f) The effective date and time for any change in benefits under 
the Servicemen's Group Life Insurance program shall be based on the 
International Date Line.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to amendments to chapter 19 of title 38, United 
States Code, that take effect after November 29, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
#### In re: Green MILLER, Jr., Bank of America, Appellee Green Miller, Jr., Appellant.

No. 06-7012.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 19, 2007.

*2Dennis P. McGlone, Susan Joy Klein, Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Green Miller, Jr., Washington, DC, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, ROGERS, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration or to reopen the case be affirmed. The district court properly denied reconsideration of its October 18, 2005, order denying appellant’s motion for leave to file an appeal. Appellant’s motion for reconsideration offered no basis for questioning the district court’s holding that he had not met the requirements for extending or reopening the time to file an appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), 4(a)(6). Moreover, the rule of *English-Speaking Union v. Johnson,*353 F.3d 1013, 1020-23 (D.C.Cir.2004), has been limited to “dismissals of bankruptcy appeals for nonjurisdictional procedural violations,” and did not require the district court to set forth its reasons for denying the motion for reconsideration. *See Fox v. American Airlines,*389 F.3d 1291, 1295 (D.C.Cir.2004).

To the extent appellant sought relief from the judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b), appellant presents no arguments on appeal that would justify a conclusion that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion. *See Browder v. Director, Illinois Dep’t of Corrections,*434 U.S. 257, 263 n. 7, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (denial of Rule 60(b) post-judgment motion overturned only if the district court abused its discretion).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 11, 2000, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), United Technologies Corporation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Tyco Printed Circuit Group, Inc., Stafford Springs, CT; and Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI have been dropped as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and United Technologies Corporation intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 11, 1999, United Technologies Corporation filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 20, 1999 (64 FR 27604).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-4703 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Christopher Mark KERN, Appellant.

No. 10-1982.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 3, 2010.

Filed: Nov. 5, 2010.

Mary Clare Luxa, Maureen McGuire, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Appellee.

Christopher Mark Kern, Des Moines, IA, pro se.

John P. Messina, Assistant, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Appellant.

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Mark Kern appeals the 120-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and a forfeiture count. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable.

We conclude that the district court committed no procedural error and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 *33S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (in reviewing sentence, appellate court first ensures that district court committed no significant procedural error, then considers substantive reasonableness of sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard; if sentence is within applicable Guidelines range, appellate court may apply presumption of reasonableness); *United States v. Haack,*403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir.2005) (describing abuse of discretion).

Having reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2608 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2608

To make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to conduct 
                the quarterly financial report program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

   Mr. Sawyer (for himself and Mr. Myers of Indiana) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to conduct 
                the quarterly financial report program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That, effective as of September 30, 1993, section 4 of Public Law 97-
454 (13 U.S.C. 91 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) AND


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Spartech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended October 29, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy C. Martin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Randy C. MartinRandy C. MartinExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerDecember 21, 2011
#### Elliot Nilsson GARCIA-CASTRO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-73905.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 11, 2014.

Bernadette Willeke Connolly, Law Offices of Bernadette W. Connolly, San Jose, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Brooke Maurer, Trial, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Elliot Nilsson Garcia-Castro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. *Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales,*497 F.3d 919, 921 (9th Cir.2007). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

Garcia-Castro’s undisputed deportability for a controlled-substance violation under former 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2)(B)® precludes us from considering his contention that the BIA abused its discretion by denying his motion to reopen. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C); *Bermudez v. Holder,*586 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th Cir.2009) (per cu-riam); *see also Ghahremani v. Gonzales,*498 F.3d 993, 998 n. 5 (9th Cir.2007) (“[Wjithdrawal of judicial review over final orders of deportation also withdraws jurisdiction from motions ... to reopen deportation proceedings for those aliens de-portable for having committed a crime enumerated in the statute.” (citation omitted)).

*487We retain jurisdiction to review questions of law and constitutional claims. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). But in light of the BIA’s dispositive determination that Garcia-Castro’s motion was untimely, the BIA did not need to address his arguments and evidence regarding prosecutorial discretion. *See Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*871 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir.2004) (“As a general rule courts and agencies are not required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the results they reach.” (citation omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Farm Service Agency

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

2023 URBAN COUNTY COMMITTEE

ELECTIONS

JUN. 15 

2023

Beginning of 

nomination 

period.

Forms 

available at 

fsa.usda.gov/

elections.

JUN. 1

2023

Register to 

be an eligible 

voter.

ANYTIME

Contact your 

local FSA 

office for 

information 

on how to 

participate.

AUG. 1 

2023

Last day to 

file 

nomination 

forms at the 

local FSA 

county office.

NOV. 6 

2023

Ballots 

mailed 

to eligible 

voters.

DEC. 4 

2023

Last day to 

return voted 

ballots to 

the local FSA 

county office.

JAN. 1 

2024

Newly 

elected 

county 

committee 

members 

take 

office.

BE THE LINK

between your agricultural community and the USDA

June 2023 USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Robert G. Costantini,  as Chief Financial  Officer of First Aviation Services
Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  that  to my
knowledge:

(1)  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the
     period ended  July 31, 2006 (the "Report"),  filed with the U.S. Securities
     and Exchange  Commission,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 14, 2006

                                                     /S/ ROBERT G. COSTANTINI
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Robert G. Costantini
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2440 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2440

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to authorize 
  appropriations for fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 1996, and for other 
                               purposes.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2440

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
    To amend the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to authorize 
  appropriations for fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 1996, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Independent Safety Board Act 
Amendments of 1993''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 309(a) of the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 (49 
U.S.C. App. 1907(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``There are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of 
this Act not to exceed $37,580,000 for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1994, $44,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, 
and $45,100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996; such 
sums to remain available until expended.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6663

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-240-8-1; CR-01-712) Submitted: July 23, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004 Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Mark C. Moore, Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, in which Bryson requested to be resentenced. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Bryson’s motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[No. 35137-4-II.

Division Two.

August 21, 2007.]

#### AA Remodeling, *Respondent,*v. Debbie White, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 04-2-01456-2, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered July 14, 2006. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Van Deren, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Timothy Gerome MCCULLERS, a/k/a Tim, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-7305.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2011.

Timothy Gerome McCullers, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Gerome McCullers appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. McCullers,*No. 5:94-cr-00097-F-6 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
          FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED
          IN ITS FORM 10QSB FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND
          IS  QUALIFIED   IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH   FINANCIAL
          STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1.00
<CASH>                                                  3,352,808
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         118,571,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                           30,185,751
<INVENTORY>                                            11,197,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        5,753,441
<PP&E>                                                    697,886
<DEPRECIATION>                                             47,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         88,819,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   5,753,441
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      55,167
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           88,819,925
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       12,335,475
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          10,556,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           86,915
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      6,209,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           573,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (41,765)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                               1,500,000
<NET-INCOME>                                              615,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.11
        


</TABLE>