alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




Certification pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Dennis
R. Raefield, the Principal Executive Officer of Mace Security International,
Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Form 10-K of Mace Security International, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the “December 31, 2008 Form 10-K”), which this certification
accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o(d)) and information
contained in the December 31, 2008 Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mace Security
International, Inc.




Dated:
March 25, 2009


/s/ Dennis R. RaefieldDennis
      R. RaefieldPrincipal
      Executive Officer & President
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**SECTION 302 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
     I, Chris T. Sharng, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Natural Health Trends Corp.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
98

 

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005   /s/ Chris T. Sharng     Chris T. Sharng  Chief Financial Officer  
99
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated July 2, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 480 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-237687) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 2, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
       
<S>					<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>				9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>				SEP-30-1995
<CASH>					6,911,452
<SECURITIES>				000
<RECEIVABLES>				1,490,871
<ALLOWANCES>				754,251
<INVENTORY>				000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			954,077
<PP&E>					107,663,024
<DEPRECIATION>                          16,119,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          100,146,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>			56,498,393
<BONDS>                                 000
<COMMON>				000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   000
<PREFERRED>				000
<OTHER-SE>				000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		100,146,082
<SALES>                                 6,068,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>			10,518,135
<CGS>					000
<TOTAL-COSTS>				3,666,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			3,143,154
<LOSS-PROVISION>			000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>			3,259,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         443,478
<INCOME-TAX>				000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			000
<DISCONTINUED>                          000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         000
<CHANGES>				000
<NET-INCOME>				443,478
<EPS-PRIMARY>				6.25
<EPS-DILUTED>				6.25
        

</TABLE>
#### Kyle E. GRAMLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2010-5039.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 14, 2011.

Alexander M. Bullock, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Stewart D. Fried and Svetlana S. Gans.

Gregory Paris Yates, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, *442Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr. Assistant Director.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 227

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the

exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

permanent the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employer-Provided

5 Tuition Assistance Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PRO7 GRAMS.

8 (a) EXCLUSION MADE PERMANENT.—Section 127 of

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to edu-
2

• HR 227 IH

1 cational assistance programs) is amended by striking sub2 section (d).

3 (b) REPEAL OF RESTRICTIONS RELATING TO EDU4 CATION AT THE GRADUATE LEVEL.—

5 (1) Paragraph (1) of section 127(c) of such

6 Code is amended by striking the last sentence.

7 (2) Subsection (c) of section 127 of such Code

8 is amended by striking paragraph (8).

9 (c) INCREASE IN, AND INDEXING OF, MAXIMUM

10 EXCLUSION.—

11 (1) Paragraph (2) of section 127(a) of such

12 Code is amended by striking ‘‘$5,250’’ each place it

13 appears and inserting ‘‘$6,000’’.

14 (2) Subsection (a) of section 127 is amended by

15 adding at the end thereof the following new para16 graph:

17 ‘‘(3) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT OF MAXI18 MUM EXCLUSION.—In the case of any taxable year

19 beginning in a calendar year after 1993, the dollar

20 amount contained in paragraph (2) shall be in21 creased by an amount equal to—

22 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by

23 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter24 mined under section 1(f)(3), for the calendar

25 year in which the taxable year begins, by sub-
3

• HR 227 IH

1 stituting ‘calendar year 1993’ for ‘calendar year

2 1987’ in subparagraph (B) thereof.’’

3 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 December 31, 1992.

Æ
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12-884V

Filed: April 15, 2014

Not for Publication

*************************************

LYNN KOETJE, *

*

Petitioner, * 

 * Damages decision based on stipulation;

v. * DTaP vaccine; acute demyelinating 

* encephalomyelitis

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Scott W. Rooney, Farmington Hills, MI, for petitioner.

Jennifer L. Reynaud, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On April 14, 2014, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle 

this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that she suffered acute 

demyelinating encephalomyelitis (“ADEM”) that was caused by her April 9, 2012, receipt of

Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine. She further alleges that she 

experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Respondent denies that 

DTaP vaccine caused petitioner’s ADEM and its residual effects, any other injuries, or her current 

condition. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

delete such material from public access.
2

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby 

adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and 

on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of

$90,000.00, representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(a) (2006). The award shall be in the form of a check for $90,000.00 made payable to

petitioner.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.




Dated: April 14, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              79
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,862
<PP&E>                                             665
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,450
<OTHER-SE>                                    (33,722)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,527
<SALES>                                          4,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,581
<CGS>                                            4,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mitchell Rubenstein, as Chief Executive Officer of Hollywood Media Corp. (the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form
10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

   Date:   March 31, 2003             By: /s/ Mitchell Rubenstein
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Mitchell Rubenstein, Chairman of the
                                          Board and Chief Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 8, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00097

- CV

Marvin

- Levoid Goss , Appellant

v.

Joseph A. Alvesteffer , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, THE OFANIS, AND JONES

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on January 26, 2022

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs rel ating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### Drellco Lamont HUNTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lawrence PARSONS, Administrator of Lanesboro Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 14-6179.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

Drellco Lamont Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney *198General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Drellco Lamont Hunter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hunter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hunter’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel Rooney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




                                       /s/ Daniel Rooney
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer of
                                       Superconductive Components, Inc.
                                       May 14, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of FFLC Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stephen T. Kurtz, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as
added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


Date: March 11, 2004               By: /s/ Stephen T. Kurtz
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Stephen T. Kurtz, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       41
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2




November 14, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20549-0609

Re: Brunner Income Properties, L.P. I, (the "Issuer")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This cover letter is submitted to comply with the written statement requirement
of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002").

The undersigned, who are the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer of the issuer, each hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge,
the accompanying Form 10-QSB of the Issuer fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and the results of operations of the issuer.

Very truly yours,

/s/ James M. Hull
----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Deborah M. Mosely
---------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              25
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    339,459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               376,094
<PP&E>                                          65,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,215,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,728
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,790,070)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,677
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (199,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (199,286)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>