alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2461 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2461

 To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 
 to authorize the transfer to States of surplus personal property for 
donation to nonprofit providers of necessaries to impoverished families 
                            and individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 1993

 Mr. Hamilton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 
 to authorize the transfer to States of surplus personal property for 
donation to nonprofit providers of necessaries to impoverished families 
                            and individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR DONATION TO 
              PROVIDERS OF NECESSARIES TO IMPOVERISHED FAMILIES AND 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 203(j)(3)(B) of the Federal Property and Administrative 
Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 484(j)(3)(B)) is amended by inserting 
after ``homeless individuals'' the following: ``, providers of 
assistance to families or individuals whose annual incomes are below 
the poverty line (as that term is defined in section 673 of the 
Community Services Block Grant Act),''.

                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries
 Subsidiaries
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    Usual NameAmpla Energía e Serviços S.A.
    
    Brasil
    
    AmplaCentrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.
    
    Brasil
    
    Cachoeira DouradaCentral Hidroeléctrica de Betania S.A. E.S.P.
    
    Colombia
    
    BetaniaCGTF  Central Geradora Termelétrica
Fortaleza S.A.
    
    Brasil
    
    Endesa FortalezaChilectra S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    ChilectraCodensa S.A. E.S.P.
    
    Colombia
    
    CodensaCompañía Americana de Multiservicios Ltda.
    
    Chile
    
    CAMCompañía de Inteconexión Energética
    
    Brasil
    
    CIENCompañía Eléctrica Cono Sur S.A.
    
    Panamá
    
    Cono SurCompañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    CeltaEdegel S.A.A.
    
    Peru
    
    EdegelEmgesa S.A. E.S.P.
    
    Colombia
    
    EmgesaEmpresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.
    
    Argentina
    
    EdesurEmpresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    PangueEmpresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    PehuencheEmpresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    Endesa ChileEndesa Brasil S.A.
    
    Brasil
    
    Endesa BrasilEndesa Costanera S.A.
    
    Argentina
    
    Endesa CostaneraHidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.
    
    Argentina
    
    El ChocónInmobiliaria Manso de Velasco S.A.
    
    Chile
    
    IMVInversiones Distrilima
    
    Peru
    
    DistrilimaInvestluz
    
    Brasil
    
    InvestluzLuz de Bogotá S.A.
    
    Colombia
    
    Luz de BogotáSynapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda.
    
    Chile
    
    Synapsis
##### 



Exhibit
99.1
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    
    For Additional InformationContact: Robert Lentz(614)
876-2000
 SUPERCONDUCTIVE COMPONENTS, INC.
REPORTS SECOND QUARTER RESULTS
   
    
    Total revenue increased to $1,158,434 from $713,535
    
    Gross profit rose to $280,540 from $207,234
    
    Backlog of $2.0 million at quarter-end
  Second Quarter 2006 Results




---



##### 



Six Month 2006 Results
        About Superconductive Components, Inc.
 http://www.sciengineeredmaterials.com




---



#####
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                           PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joey A. Jacobs, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, and I, Jack E. Polson, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 12, 2003

                                 /s/ Joey A. Jacobs
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Joey A. Jacobs
                                 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President



                                 /s/ Jack E. Polson
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Jack E. Polson
                                 Chief Accounting Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,251,819
<SECURITIES>                                10,125,513
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,081,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,621,404
<PP&E>                                     646,498,965
<DEPRECIATION>                           (130,668,538)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             553,910,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,244,275
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 56,250,000
<COMMON>                                     1,707,377
<OTHER-SE>                                 123,200,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               553,910,305
<SALES>                                    101,639,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           108,809,948
<CGS>                                       43,229,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,354,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,144,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,688,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,023,713
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,712,369
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 8.1

List ofSignificant Subsidiaries

The following is a list ofthe of Company’s significant subsidiaries as at March 1, 2001. The listexcludes UNS and its subsidiaries acquired through the Company’sacquisition of UNS on March 6, 2001. 

```
**State or         Proportion of
                                                                     Jurisdiction of        Ownership
Name of Significant Subsidiary                                        Incorporation          Interest**
------------------------------                                        -------------          --------

BONA SHIPHOLDING LTD.                                                   BERMUDA                  100%

SINGLE SHIP COMPANIES (2)                                               AUSTRALIA                100%

SINGLE SHIP LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (42)                            MARSHALL ISLANDS         100%

SOPONATA TEEKAY LIMITED                                                 BERMUDA                   50%

TEEKAY CHARTERING LIMITED                                               MARSHALL ISLANDS         100%

TEEKAY SHIPPING LIMITED                                                 BAHAMAS                  100%
```
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                 |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                 |   |
| Date:  May 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/   James R. Ingebritsen |   |
|                     |   | James R. Ingebritsen                 |   |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer              |   |
|                     |   |                                 |   |
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ContractDecor, Inc. Under Contract No. GS-03F-052CA

Delivery Order No. W9128F-16-F-0023 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ) ) ) ) ) ) ASBCA Nos. 61336, 61564

Ian R. Feldman, Esq. Meredith D. Stewart, Esq.

Clausen Miller P.C. Irvine, CA Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Stanley E. Tracey, Esq. Erin K. Murphy, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha ORDER OF DISMISSAL Pursuant to appellant's June 19, 2018 correspondence, which states that the parties have reached a settlement agreement finally resolving the above-captioned appeals, the above-captioned appeals are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Dated: June 25, 2018

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61336, 61564, Appeals ofContract Decor, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
**KFX INC.**

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Theodore Venners, state and attest that:

1.     I am the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KFx Inc. (the “issuer”),

2.     Accompanying this certification is the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the Securities ExchangeCommission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains financial statements.

3.     I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

| •      | the periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and                                                         |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                                       |
| •      | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented therein. |

/s/ Theodore Venners               Theodore VennersChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 16, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KFx Inc. and will be retained by KFx Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          43,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         39,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,060)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,471
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (85)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (90)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (90)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.56<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.56<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Net income per listed partner unit.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. SHAWN CHEEVER, Defendant - Appellant. No. 16-1303 (D.C. No. 1:15-CR -00031-JLK-1) (D. Colo.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before LUCERO , MATHESON , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Shawn Cheever pled guilty to one count of possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). The presentence report recommended that he be subject to the enhanced sentencing provision of § 2252A(b )(2) because he had previously been convicted of an offense “r elating to . . . possession . . . of child pornography.” Id. Cheever had a prio r Colorado state conviction for sexual exploitation of a child in violation of Colo . Rev. Stat. § 18-6-403(b.5). He objected to the enhancement, but th e district court overruled hi s objection. Cheever was

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This or der and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of la w of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### December 20, 2016
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment, th e statutory minimum under § 2252A(b)(2). He timely appealed. On appeal, Cheever concedes that his sole argument—that a Colorado conviction for sexual exploitati on of a child does not qualify as an offense relating to possession of child pornography under § 2252A(b)(2)—is foreclosed by circuit precedent. In United States v. Bennett, 823 F.3d 1316 (10th Cir. 2016), we held that the defendant’s “prior Colorado misdemea nor conviction for sexual exploitation of a child ‘relates to’ child pornogr aphy, and he is therefore eligible for the mandatory minimum.” Id. at 1318. Bu t see id. at 1327 (Hartz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (stating th at because “the definition of child pornography in the Colorado statute is broader than the definiti on of the term in the federal enhancement statute . . . I would hold th at the Colorado statute” doe s not qualify). “We are bound by the precedent of prior panels absent en banc reconsiderati on or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme Court.” United States v. Killi on, 7 F.3d 927, 930 (10th Cir. 1993) (italics omitted). Exercising jurisdiction unde r 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM

.
Entered for the Court

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2713 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2713

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that former prisoners 
of war are eligible for reimbursement for emergency medical expenses on 
   the same basis as veterans with total permanent service-connected 
                             disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 1993

   Mr. Rowland (by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that former prisoners 
of war are eligible for reimbursement for emergency medical expenses on 
   the same basis as veterans with total permanent service-connected 
                             disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL EXPENSES FOR FORMER 
              PRISONERS OF WAR.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 1728(a)(2) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``or'' before ``(D)''; and
            (2) by striking out the semicolon at the end and inserting 
        in lieu thereof ``, or (E) for any disability of a veteran who 
        is a former prisoner of war;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to hospital care and medical services rendered on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Sven EHAND, also known as Mika Jakonen, Appellant.

No. 10-2208.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 28, 2010.

Filed: Feb. 11, 2011.

Richard D. Westphal, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Davenport, IA, for Appellee.

Sven Ehand, Dubuque, IA, pro se.

Steven Warren Hanna, Moline, IL, for Appellant.

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Sven Ehand pled guilty to possessing fifteen or more counterfeit access devices, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(3), 2. The district court1 imposed a prison sentence of 12 months and 1 day, the lower end of the advisory guidelines range. On appeal, Ehand’s counsel has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising an ineffective-assistance claim.2

We decline to consider the ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal. *See United States v. Cain,*134 F.3d 1345, 1352 (8th Cir.1998) (an ineffective-assistance claim should be raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition). Furthermore, we conclude that the district court committed no procedural error and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (in reviewing a sentence, an appellate court first ensures that the district court committed no significant procedural error and then considers the substantive reasonableness of the sentence under an abuse-of-discretion standard); *United States v. Haack,*403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir.2005) (describing abuse of discretion).

Having reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

2

. After the *Anders*brief was filed, Ehand retained new counsel, who filed an appearance on his behalf on January 3, 2011. Ehand’s original appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw, which was granted on January 4, 2011. Ehand’s newly retained counsel has not requested leave to file a supplemental brief.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000721

30-MAR-2017

08:07 AM