alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2642 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2642

  To provide for financing of certain recreational facilities in the 
                    White Mountain National Forest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 1993

  Mr. Swett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for financing of certain recreational facilities in the 
                    White Mountain National Forest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINANCING AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--A bond issued as part of an issue 95 percent or 
more of the net proceeds of which are to be used to provide sports 
facilities (within the meaning of section 103(b)(4)(B) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1954) shall be treated as an exempt facility bond for 
purposes of part IV of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 if such facilities meet the following 
requirements:
            (1) The facilities are located in or in the immediate 
        vicinity of the White Mountain National Forest and are part of 
        a single recreational complex located in one town.
            (2) A portion of the facilities are described in a 
        resolution adopted by a State industrial development authority 
        on July 17, 1985.
    (b) Clarification of Resolution.--The resolution described in 
subsection (a)(2) shall be treated as if it describes all of the sports 
facilities in or to be in the recreational complex described in 
subsection (a)(1) and such facilities shall be treated as if they were 
a single facility the acquisition and construction of which began 
before September 2, 1972, and which is not now substantially complete.
    (c) Limitation.--The aggregate face amount of bonds that may be 
issued under this section (excluding current refundings) shall not 
exceed $40,000,000.
    (d) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act. This section shall not apply to any bond 
(excluding current refundings) issued after September 30, 2003.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Southwest Research Institute (``SwRI''): 
Advanced Reciprocating Engine Systems (``ARES'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 16, 2001, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute (``SwRI''): Advanced Reciprocating Engine Systems (``ARES'') 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership and project status. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Altronic, Inc. has been dropped as a party to this 
venture; and the period of performance has been extended to May 30, 
2001.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Southwest Research Institute 
(``SwRI''): Advanced Reciprocating Engine Systems (``ARES'') intends to 
file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On February 9, 1999, Southwest Research Institute (``SwRI''): 
Advanced Reciprocating Engine Systems (``ARES'') filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on May 26, 1999 (64 FR 28521).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 6, 
2000. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on July 11, 2000 (65 FR 42727).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-5064 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Acres Gaming Incorporated (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "FORM 10-K"), I,
Patrick W. Cavanaugh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: September 26, 2003

                                           /s/ Patrick W. Cavanaugh
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Patrick W. Cavanaugh
                                           Senior Vice President,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the undersigned officer of Chase Packaging Corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| November 16, 2009 | /s/ Allen T. McInnes                           |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Allen T. McInnes                               |
|                   | Chairman of the Board, President and Treasurer |
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer)                  |

 

----
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Bryan Scott Tennison , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00253

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.
2229385 ). Panel consi sts of Chief Justice

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Bryan Scott Tennison , has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 1 2 , 2024
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
----------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
partner of the Registrant
February 13, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Todd Bruce, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Crystallex International Corporation (the “Company”), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 40-F/A – No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2005, of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

Date: June 15, 2006 

/s/ Todd BruceTodd BrucePresident and Chief Executive Officer

----
Student Handout- Module Number Fifteen (15) - Records for Product Protection 

Records for Product Protection 

Product protection for thermally processed foods involves: 

- Thermal process records 

- Critical factor control records 

- Closure evaluation records 

The main sections dealing with recordkeeping, reviewing, and maintenance requirements 

are in sections 431.7 and 431.8 

1. Records demonstrate Compliance with regulations 

2. Records provide assurance of proper and safe application of thermal processes 

3. Careful review of records can give indication of problem 

Automatic recordkeeping may be integrated with thermal processing control systems.

Establishments should notify FSIS prior to use.

Automatic recordkeeping systems must be validated in accordance with 417.4(a)(1). 

Processing and container closure evaluation records must be retained for 3 years.

FSIS permits storage at an alternate site during the last 2 years of the retention period 

Establishment must provide

1. Process schedule development records 

2. Process schedules 

3. Critical factors records 

4. Time/temperature recording charts 

5. Processing (retort or aseptic system) records 

6. Container closure specifications/guidelines 

7. Container closure/integrity records 

8. Retort operation documentation 

9. MIG calibration/accuracy records

10. Yearly retort maintenance records

11. Information on recycled or reused container cooling water

12. A process deviation log

13. Coding for each container 

14. Initial distribution records 

15. Product incubation results 

16. A recall procedure 

Page 1 
FSIS requires: 

- product, day, and year 

- establishment number on the label or container 

Computerized or automated recordkeeping systems can be used for thermal processing,

critical factor monitoring and container integrity testing provided they meet the

requirements in FSIS regulations. 

Automated recordkeeping systems for retorts and aseptic systems are usually integrated

with thermal processing control systems. 

FSIS has encouraged the industry to work cooperatively in the development of

automated recordkeeping systems. 

Computerized record systems must be validated. 

Page 2
(b) (6) (b) (6)

(b) (6)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification bythe Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Frank A. D'Amelio,hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Pfizer Inc. for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in thatReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Pfizer Inc. 

/s/ Frank A. D'Amelio            Frank A. D'AmelioSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 2, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, exceptto the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "ExchangeAct"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated byreference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Paul Marciano, Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Guess?, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Date: March 31, 2009

By:

/s/ PAUL MARCIANO Paul Marciano Chief Executive Officer and
Vice Chairman of the Board


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Guess?, Inc. and will be retained by Guess?, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
USDA INSPECTED

MOBILE LIVESTOCK

PROCESSING

*

A collaborative effort involving a number of different agencies, organizations and producers

This unit was the first of its kind in the US

Why we undertook this project and what it has done for our community

Production of Finished Animals

Storage 

Sales & Distribution

Mobile On Farm Slaughter

Aging 

Fabrication & Packaging

USDA Inspected Processing

*

*

What is a Mobile Slaughter System?

How Does it Work?

Why Would You Want One?

A Day in the Life of a Mobile Slaughter Unit

Cooler Capacity

Beef    10

Hogs     20

Lambs  70

Offal Remains on Farm

Why Mobile?

 No Transport of Animals 

	Less Stress on Animals

	Reduced Cost

 Local Resistance to Slaughter House

	 Land Use Issues Make Locating a 		Slaughter Facility Difficult

 Less Capital Investment

San Juan County

Slaughter Facility Comparison
| MSU                  | Fixed Plant                            |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Daily Capacity       | 10                                     | 10 |
| Animal Handling      | Existing Facilities on Farm            | New |
| Offal Disposal       | Compost on Farm                        | Rendering |
| Environmental Issues | Minimal Additional Facilities Required | Highly Regulated Costly Facilities |
| Capital Cost         | $200,000 - $250,000                    | $400,000+ |
| Time to Build        | 3 Months                               | 12 Months |

Benefits to Local Farmers and the Community

USDA Inspection Increases Market Opportunities for Farmers

Economic Development for Community

Significant Improvement in Economic Viability of Small Farms

Direct Marketing Locally Raised Meat

*

IGFC Results 
        -  Meat Processed           128	      225	254          244         308
        -  Producers Served         45	       53	             55             52         50
        - Live Animal Value      $217        $370	          $396         $380      $480
        - Retail Meat Value      $421        $732	          $861          $827    $1,044

2003	   2004   2005   2006  2007

Values in Thousands

*

 Video of Unit in Operation

NMPAN

http://www.extension.org/pages/Meat_Processing_Videos
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-23611 dated April 10, 1997 and No. 333-45597 dated February 4,
1998) and the related Prospectuses of Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. (the
"Company") for the registration of $250,000,000 and $300,000,000, respectively,
of the Company's common stock, preferred stock, debt securities and warrants;
and (2) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-73688) pertaining to the
Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. 1993 Share Option Plan, and the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-92082) pertaining to the Pacific Gulf Properties Inc.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan of our report dated February 15, 2001 (except Note 11
as to which the date is March 9, 2001), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and related financial statement schedule of Pacific Gulf
Properties Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
December 31, 2000.


                                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California
June 14, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

ZACHARY GENE STRASSBURGER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM RETIRED STATUS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 235 DB 2018 (No. 28 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 313991

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2019, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated March 11, 2019, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Zachary Gene Strassburger, who has been on Retired Status, has never been suspended 

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT
10.1


Sona Mobile Holdings Corp.
Compensation
Plan for Directors, as amended


Each non-employee director,
immediately upon his or her election or appointment to the Board of
Directors (the ‘‘Board’’) of Sona Mobile
Holdings Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’), shall
receive 40,000 shares of common stock, of which 20,000 shares will vest
immediately and 20,000 will vest on the first anniversary of his or her
election to the Board. If the director leaves the Board for any reason,
voluntarily or involuntarily, before the first anniversary of his or
her election to the Board, he or she will forfeit any unvested shares.
In addition, any Chairman of the Audit Committee who is also designated
as an audit committee ‘‘financial expert’’
will receive an additional 60,000 restricted shares upon his or her
appointment as such, 30,000 of which will vest immediately and 30,000
of which will vest on the first anniversary of his or her appointment.
Each non-employee director will also receives an annual
director’s fee of $5,000 and an option to purchase 5,000 shares
of common stock, which option will become exercisable in equal
quarterly installments and $250, plus reimbursement for actual
out-of-pocket expenses, for each Board meeting attended in person and
$125 for each Board meeting attended telephonically.

The Chairmen
of the Audit Committee and the Compensation and Nominating Committee
each receive an annual fee of $1,000, payable in equal quarterly
installments. Each member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation
and Nominating Committee shall receive $250, plus reimbursement for
actual out-of-pocket expenses, for each committee meeting attended in
person and $125 for each committee meeting attended telephonically,
unless the committee meeting immediately precedes or follows a Board
meeting, in which event the committee members will receive $150, for
attending the committee meeting in person and $75.00 if they attend the
committee meeting telephonically.
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




Board of Directors


Mace Security International, Inc.




We have issued our report dated March 30, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Mace Security International, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Mace Security International, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-87981, effective September 28, 1999, amended December 27, 1999, File No. 333-34096, effective April 5, 2000, File No. 333-34536, effective April 11, 2000, File No. 333-116527, effective June 16, 2004, amended September 24, 2004, and File No. 333-122074, effective January 14, 2005, amended February 3, 2005) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-31757, effective on July 22, 1997 and File No. 333-93311, effective on December 21, 1999).





Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMarch 30, 2011