alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1


# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted April 7 , 201 5 * Decided April 21, 2015



### Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge

A NN C LAIRE W ILLIAMS , Circuit Judge

D AVID F. H AMILTON , Circuit Judge

No. 14

- 3079

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee
,

v

.

K IRK A CREY , Defendant

- Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 07 CR 211 Amy J. St. Eve
, Judge

.

Order

After the Sentencing Commission reduced the range for crack

- cocaine offenses in 2011, and made that change retroactive (see Amendment 750), Kirk Acrey asked the di strict court to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2). His original sentenc e of 150 months already was well below his range of 262 to 327 months, and the district judge denied his motion. The judge stated that Acrey’s original sentence depended on

* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).No. 14

- 3079 Page 2

the career

- offender Guideline and that Amendment 750 did not affect the prescribed
range. Acrey did not appeal.

About nine months later, Acrey filed a second motion, again relying on Amendment
750. He contended that his original sentence did not depend on the career

- offender Guideline and that, contrary to the district judge’s expressed belief, he could benefit from Amendment 750 . He also contend ed that the judge should have considered his conduct in prison, which includes (he maintains) completing many courses and obtai ning a GED. The district judge denied this motion as successive

— and r ightly so.

We held in United States v. Redd , 630 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2011), that §3582(c)(2) autho rizes only one sentence

- reduction motion per retroactive change to the Guidelines. The way to obtain review of a district court’s order denying a motion is to appeal, not to file a new motion in the district court. Redd compelled the district court to deny Acrey’s
successive motion.

A FFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date: August 1, 2005

                                       /s/  Gerald S. Blaskie
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Gerald S. Blaskie
                                       Chief Financial Officer of
                                       Superconductive Components, Inc.
EXHIBIT 99(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel Rooney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-OxlEy Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

                                                  /s/ Daniel Rooney
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Daniel Rooney
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  May 15, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
         been provided to Superconductive Components, Inc., and will be retained
         by Superconductive Components, Inc., and furnished to the Security and
         Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2689

To amend Public Law 100–518 and the United States Grain Standards

Act to extend through September 30, 1998, the authority of the Federal

Grain Inspection Service to collect fees to cover administrative and supervisory costs, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1993

Mr. DE LA GARZA (by request) (Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. PENNY, Mr. EMERSON, and Mr. ALLARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend Public Law 100–518 and the United States Grain

Standards Act to extend through September 30, 1998,

the authority of the Federal Grain Inspection Service

to collect fees to cover administrative and supervisory

costs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 2 of Public Law 100–518 (102 Stat. 2584)

4 is amended by striking out in the introductory clause ‘‘Ef5 fective for the period October 1, 1988, through September

6 30, 1993, inclusive,’’ and inserting in lieu therefore ‘‘Ef-
2

HR 2689 IH

1 fective for the period October 1, 1988, through September

2 30, 1988, inclusive,’’.

3 SEC. 2. Effective for the period beginning with the

4 date of enactment of this Act or October 1, 1993, which5 ever shall sooner occur, and ending September 30, 1998,

6 the United States Grain Standards Act, as amended by

7 the United States Grain Standards Act Amendments of

8 1988 (Public Law 100–518; 102 Stat. 2584) is further

9 amended;

10 (1) in section 7D (7 U.S.C. 79d) by striking

11 out ‘‘for each of the fiscal years 1989 through

12 1993’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘for each of the

13 fiscal years 1989 through 1998’’;

14 (2) in section 19 (7 U.S.C. 89h) by striking out

15 ‘‘during the period beginning October 1, 1988, and

16 ending September 30, 1993, to the extent that fi17 nancing is not obtained from fees and sales of sam18 ples as provided for in sections 7, 7A, and 17A of

19 this Act’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘during the

20 period beginning October 1, 1988, and ending Sep21 tember 30, 1998, to the extent that financing is not

22 obtained from fees and sales of samples as provided

23 for in sections 7, 7A, 7B, and 17A of this Act’’; and

24 (3) by striking out section 21 (7 U.S.C. 87j).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIALINFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              55
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    55
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      55
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          406,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,728
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,136,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        55
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 262 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 262

 To direct the Secretary of Commerce to approve and distribute to food 
  service operations instructions for removing food which has become 
                      lodged in a person's throat.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Neal of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Commerce to approve and distribute to food 
  service operations instructions for removing food which has become 
                      lodged in a person's throat.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
Commerce, upon recommendation of the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services, shall approve instructions specifying first aid techniques, 
especially the Heimlich Maneuver, designed for use by persons without 
medical training, for removing food which has become lodged in any 
person's throat.
    Sec. 2. (a) The Secretary of Commerce shall publish in the Federal 
Register the instructions approved under the first section of this Act 
and shall distribute the instructions to each food service operation in 
the United States. In distributing the instructions, the Secretary 
shall utilize, to the maximum extent practicable, the resources of the 
Department of Commerce.
    (b) Any food service operation may post the instructions on the 
premises so that persons employed by the food service operation may 
become familiar with the first aid techniques and may consult the 
instructions to provide relief to any person who is choking.
    Sec. 3. No court of the United States shall have jurisdiction to 
enter any judgment against any person for the acts or omissions of any 
individual in removing, attempting to remove, or assisting the removal 
of food lodged in any person's throat if such individual acted in 
accordance with the instructions approved under this Act by the 
Secretary of Commerce.
    Sec. 4. For purposes of this Act, the term ``food service 
operation'' means any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, 
soda fountain, or other facility which is principally engaged in 
selling food or beverages for consumption on the premises.

                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACK C. SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1693

[August 24, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard Bober, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 07012264CF10A.

Jack C. Smith, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*February 25, 2010*

[Cite as *02/25/2010 Case Announcements,*2010-Ohio-644.]

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2009-1953.

#### Fischbach v. Mercuri.

Montgomery App. No. 23188, 184 Ohio App.3d 105, 2009-Ohio-4790. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal,

It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                  PROMISSORY NOTE


$500,000.00                                                      October 9, 1998
                                                            Salt Lake City, Utah

          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, RENAISSANCE GOLF PRODUCTS, 
INC., a Delaware corporation and JOHN B. HEWLETT ("Payor") promised to pay to 
ALVIN W. EMERY, or holder ("Payee"), the principal sum of Five Hundred 
Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($500,000.00), together with simple interest at 
the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum on the aggregate principal balance 
outstanding until paid in full. This note shall be due on or before January 
7, 1999.  The Note shall be repaid from sale proceeds received from Target, 
Oshman's, and Garts during the fourth quarter of 1998.

          In the event of default under this Note, Payee shall be entitled to 
collect a reasonable attorneys' fee from the Payor, as well as other costs, 
charges, and expenses reasonably incurred, in curing any default or 
attempting collection of the payment due on this Note, whether or not 
litigation or any proceeding to enforce this Note is commenced.

          This Note together with the loan fee and accumulated interest may 
be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty.

          If any term or provision of this Note, or any portion of any such 
term or provision, shall be held invalid or against public policy, or if the 
application of the same to any person or circumstance is held invalid or 
against public policy, then, the remainder of this Note (or the remainder of 
such term or provision) and the application thereof to other persons or 
circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall remain valid and in 
full force and effect to the fullest extent permitted by law.

          This Note shall be governed by and construed solely in accordance 
with the laws of the State of Utah.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Payor has executed this Promissory Note as of 
the day first hereinabove written at Salt Lake City, Utah.

                                   "PAYOR"
                                   RENAISSANCE GOLF PRODUCTS, INC.



                                   BY: 
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                        JOHN B. HEWLETT, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD



                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   JOHN B. HEWLETT
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*December 16, 2009*

[Cite as *12/16/2009 Case Announcements,*2009-Ohio-6487.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2009-1769.

#### State ex rel. Lawrence v. Kilbane.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ David              Salzman                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| David              Salzman                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |   |        |
| Chief                Executive Officer of Richman TaxCredit                Properties Inc., general partner ofRichman                Tax Credit Properties L.P., generalpartner                of the RegistrantMarch                14, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
Exhibit
23.4





CONSENT
OF MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LTD.








The
undersigned does hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Crystallex International Corporation, which is being
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references
to and summaries of the report, Technical Report Update on the Las Cristinas
Project, Bolivar State, Venezuela, dated November 7, 2007 (the "Incorporated
Information") included in the Annual Information Form of Crystallex
International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
"AIF").





The
undersigned does hereby confirm that he has read the AIF and the AIF fairly and
accurately represents the Incorporated Information, and the AIF does not
materially misrepresent, by omission or otherwise, any of the Incorporated
Information.





The
undersigned does also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form F-1 (No. 333-08878), on Form F-3 (Nos.
333-125380, 333-101583 and 333-91402) and on Form S-8 (No, 333-126128) of
Crystallex International Corporation of the Incorporated
Information.





Dated
this  28th day of
March, 2008.








MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATESLTD.








/s/
      STEVEN RISTORCELLIName:
      Steven
      Ristorcelli, P.Geo.Title:  
      Principal
      Geologist
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                  CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 12 INCORPORATED
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

GENA (CA) QRS 12-1, INC.

BBC (NE) QRS 12-2, INC.

ELWA-BV (NY) QRS 12-3, INC.

ADS (CA) QRS 12-4, INC.

WALS (IN) QRS 12-5, INC.

ESI (CA) QRS 12-6, INC.

SFC (TX) QRS 12-7, INC.

SEEDS (TN) QRS 12-9, INC.

DELMO (PA) QRS 12-10, INC.

ABI (TX) QRS 12-11, INC.

CARDS (CA) QRS 12-12, INC.

RSI (NJ) QRS 12-13, INC.

TEL (VA) QRS 12-15, INC.

LAX (DE) QRS 12-16, INC.

CEL (IN) QRS 12-17, INC.

SFC (TX) QRS 12-18, INC.

CTC (MD) QRS 12-19, INC.

SPEC (CA) QRS 12-20, INC.

INK (AL) QRS 12-21, INC.

WEEDS (OK) QRS 12-22, INC.

<PAGE>

NOG (NY) QRS 12-23, INC.

BUILD (CA) QRS 12-24, INC.

BT (PA) QRS 12-25, INC.

RSI LOAN (NJ) QRS 12-26, INC.

ICE (TX) QRS 12-29, INC.

URSA (VT) QRS 12-30, INC.

GGAP (MA) QRS 12-31, INC.

CAN (WI) QRS 12-34, INC.

INFO (CA) QRS 12-35, INC.

WTI (IL) QRS 12-36, INC.

SOAP (CA) QRS 12-37, INC.

BROWN (MN) QRS 12-38, INC.

NUTRA (TX) QRS 12-39, INC.

PRINT (WI) QRS 12-40, INC.

CASH (MA) QRS 12-41, INC.

QRS 12-PAYING AGENT, INC.

CARE (PA) QRS 12-43, INC.

IM (DE) QRS 12-44, INC.

SEMI (CA) QRS 12-45, INC.

INJECTION (AZ) QRS 12-46, INC.

COMP (TX) QRS 12-47, INC.

VCR (DE) QRS 12-48, INC.

<PAGE>

FOOD (DE) QRS 12-49, INC.

COLD (DE) QRS 12-50, INC.

CP GAL FAIRFAX LLC

CP GAL LOMBARD LLC

BUTTERED (TX) LP

BRI (MN) QRS 12-52, INC.

INITIATOR (CA) QRS 12-53, INC.

AUSTOSAFE AIRBAG 12 (CA) LP

JEN (MA) QRS 12-54, INC.

ORB (MO) QRS 12-56, INC.

C.C. MORTGAGE SECURITIES LLC

CC-MTGE MEMBER, INC.

CB (MA) QRS 12-57, INC.

CC (MULTI) GP QRS 12-62, INC.

CC (MULTI) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CTS (IN) QRS 12-63, INC.

FIT (TX) GP QRS 12-60, INC.

FIT (TX) LP

KN (NY) QRS 12-64, INC.

RI (CA) QRS 12-59, INC.

RRC (TX) GP QRS 12-61, INC.

RRC (TX) LP

<PAGE>

BVNY (DE) M QRS 12-58, INC.

HAMMER (DE) LP QRS 12-65, INC.

24 HR-TX (TX) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

24 HR-TX GP (TX) QRS 12-66, INC.

CAN-TWO (DE) QRS 12-67, INC.

SUN (SC) QRS 12-68, INC.