alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.13

ENERGYSOLUTIONS

18 December 2009

Mark MorantPresident, International GroupMs C Spottiswoode CBE
39 Lonsdale Square
London
N1 1EW

Direct tel: 01793 733118
Direct fax: 01793 733179


Dear
Clare

LETTER OF APPOINTMENT: SUBJECT TO ENERGYSOLUTIONSLLC
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE APPROVAL

The
Board of Directors(Board)of EnergySolutionsEU Limited (Company)is pleased to hear that you have accepted
our offer to join the Board as Non-Executive Chairperson.

This
letter sets out the main terms of your appointment. It is agreed between us that this is a contract for services and is not a contract of employment.

By
accepting this appointment, you confirm that you are not subject to any restrictions which prevent you from holding office as a Director.

1

---





2

---





You
will be paid an annual fee of £150,000 in equal installments monthly in arrears after deduction of any taxes and other amounts that are required by law, which will be
subject to an annual review by the Board, The Company will reimburse you for all reasonable and properly documented expenses that you incur in performing the duties of your office.

In
some circumstances you may consider that you need professional advice in the furtherance of your duties as a Director and it may be appropriate for you to seek advice from independent
advisors at the Company's expense,

It
is accepted and acknowledged that you have business interests other than those of the Company and have declared any conflicts that are apparent at present. If you become aware of any
potential conflicts of interest, these should be disclosed to the President, International Group and the Company Secretary as soon as you become aware of them.

After
the commencement of the appointment, and insofar as you consider that it would be helpful to you, the Company will arrange for you to receive a tailored induction, This will
include, for example, visits to sites and meetings with a number of customers, key contacts and senior managers of the business.

3

---



The
performance of individual Directors, the whole Board and its committees is evaluated annually. If, in the interim, there are any matters which cause you concern about your role you
should discuss them with the President, International Group as soon as you can,

The
Company has Directors' and Officers' Liability insurance and intends to maintain such cover for the full term of your appointment.



Please
indicate your acceptance of these terms by signing and returning the attached copy of this letter.

Yours
sincerely

Mark
Morant
President, International Group
For and on behalf of EnergySolutionsEU Limited

I, Clare Spottiswoode,agree to the above terms of appointment as a Non-Executive Chairperson.

By:

/s/ CLARE SPOTTISWOODE CLARE SPOTTISWOODE

December 21, 2009 Date


4

---



QuickLinks
2010-0030.

#### State v. Stephens.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92430, 2009-Ohio-6305. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment pending appeal or, in the alternative, to set bond. Motion denied.
#### Harry G. SCHORTMANN, Jr. and Jacqueline Schortmann, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2010-5120.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2011.

*481Brian C. McManus, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Theodore Joshua Wu.

Richard D. Farber, Attorney, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were John A. Dicicco, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Damon W. Taaffe, Attorney.

Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-26297, 333-65379, 333-86222, and 333-88973 of Kontron Mobile Computing, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated January 23, 2004 relating to the
financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31,
2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2003.

                          /s/ Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co. P.L.L.P
                              Certified Public Accountants

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 30, 2004
# FY20_Q1

# Percent Positives - User Notes
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2799

To suspend temporarily the duty on anthraquinone disulfonic acid sodium

salt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1993

Mr. SHAYS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on anthraquinone disulfonic

acid sodium salt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.11 Anthraquinone

disulfonic acid sodium salt (provided

for in subheading

2914.70.20) ........... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95 ’’.
2

•HR 2799 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,109,362                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  322,057                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,626                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    346,603                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,917,317                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,182,533                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 306,135                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,793,715                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591,158                       0
<BONDS>                                        468,815                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     8,392,644                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,683,752)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,793,715                       0
<SALES>                                        876,608                 477,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               923,457                 495,744
<CGS>                                          800,073                 407,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  800,073                 407,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,127,839                 574,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,402                   3,402
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,012                  24,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,054,467)               (510,408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,054,467)               (510,408)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,054,467)               (510,408)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)                   (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)                   (.13)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Richard T. Schumacher, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
      United States Code) that:





(1)
        The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
              August 14, 2007
            By:
            */s/
              Richard T. Schumacher*Richard
                T. SchumacherPresident
                & Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         480,054
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,680,182
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,893,665
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         3,918,064
<LOANS>                                     81,812,739
<ALLOWANCE>                                    301,867
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,840,036
<DEPOSITS>                                  82,345,925
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            773,072
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,161,212
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,559,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             100,840,036
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,771,028
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              556,663
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               210,001
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,537,692
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,807,239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,012,428
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,525,264
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   69,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,328,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,327,706
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,327,706
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   825,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.91
<LOANS-NON>                                    274,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               232,867
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              301,867
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           301,867
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
SAMPLE SCHEDULE A DOCUMENTATION

(Must be on official letterhead and must include a signature)

DATE:

FROM: 

To Whom it May Concern: 

This letter serves as certification that (name of patient/applicant) is an individual with a 

severe physical, intellectual, or psychiatric disability that qualifies him/her for 

consideration under 5 CFR 213.3102 (u), Schedule A hiring authority, appointment for 

Persons with Disabilities. 

I may be contacted at (authorized representative):

(Printed Name) (Signature)

Organization Address, city, state/Phone

Note: Proof of a disability is required for excepted service appointments - noncompetitive 

placement - under Schedule A, 5 CFR § 213.3102(u). Proof of disability is the term used 

to define any number of documents which attest to the fact that the candidate does indeed 

have a disability. A statement of job readiness, formerly a requirement under this statute, 

is no longer needed. The above statements meet the requirements for placement under 

Schedule A.
Exhibit 23.2 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-04298, 333-28129, 333-82455, 333-88211, 333-87774, 333-104677 and333-106207) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-09873, 333-82357 and 333-106129) of KFx, Inc. of our report dated April 12, 2002, except for Note 2 as to which the date is March 15, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Denver, Colorado 

March 15, 2004
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2929 Lower Tribunal No. 202 0

- CA

- 7906

- O

_____________________________ F LORIDA I NSURANCE G UARANTY A SSOCIATION ,

Appellant ,
v. V ILLANOVA AT H UNTER ’ S C REEK C ONDOMINIUM A SSOCIATION , I NC

. , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Denise Kim Beamer , Judge. March 19, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA, MIZE and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Mark D. Tinker , of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. , Tampa , for Appellant. George A. Vaka , of Vaka Law Group, P.L. , Tampa , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILE D
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kontron Mobile Computing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Sparrvik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                        /s/  Thomas Sparrvik
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Thomas Sparrvik
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        March 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kontron Mobile Computing, Inc. and will be retained by Kontron
Mobile Computing, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

                                       1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6337

SCOTT STEVEN MERRILL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE HINKLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-772-7) Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 24, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Morchower, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jerry Walter Kilgore, Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Scott Steven Merrill, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Merrill has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 26, 2004 (the “Report”), I, James M.Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the “Registrant, do hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theRegistrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 
| Dated: | March 25,  2005     |   | /s/ JAMES M.  WILLIAMS |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | James M.  Williams       |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

1

----
#### Amalia CARLOS DE GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-72494.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2011.

Gary Finn, Law Offices of Gary Finn, Indio, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Liza Murcia, Oil, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Amalia Carlos de Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, and review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Aguilar Gonzalez v. Mulcasey,*534 F.3d 1204, 1208 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Carlos de Gonzalez participated in alien smuggling as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i), where the record reflects that she gave her daughter’s permanent resident card to another alien intending to assist that alien’s entry into the United States in violation of law. *See Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales,*487 F.3d 742, 748-49 (9th Cir.2007) (knowing act of assistance to another’s effort to enter the United States illegally is an affirmative act constituting alien smuggling); *cf. Aguilar Gonzalez,*534 F.3d at 1209 (no affirmative act of alien smuggling where petitioner did not provide her daughter’s birth certificate for use by another to enter the United States, but merely acquiesced to its use).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.