alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ David Salzman
--------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
general partner of the Company
February 13, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-4298), (No. 333-28129), (No. 333-82455) and
(No. 333-88211) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-9873)
and (No. 333-82357) of KFx Inc. of our report dated April 14, 2000 relating to
the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Denver, Colorado
April 14, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0124 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

RICHARD WAYNE SPARKS, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

FLED 

MAR 2 2 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Richard Wayne Sparks petitions this Court for an out-of-time appeal from the order 

revoking his sentence and imposing a revocation sentence, entered by the District Court on 

April 6, 2021. Revocation was ordered upon Sparks' entry of a true plea to the allegations 

of the petition, which asserted that Sparks had violated his suspended sentence by being 

charged with the new crimes of assault with a weapon, criminal endangerment, and partner 

or family member assault. 

Sparks states that he discussed filing a timely appeal with his attorney, but that his 

attorney failed to file an appeal. He explains that he requested a copy of his final judgment 

from the District Court and that he never received any document, even after several 

attempts. He includes other documents with his verified Petition. 

M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant an out-of-time appeal "[i]n the 

infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross 

miscarriage of justice[t 

Available electronic records provide that the Cascade County District Court held an 

evidentiary and dispositional hearing on April 6, 2021, on the State's petition to revoke 

Sparks' sentence upon the alleged violations of his probationary conditions. The District 

Court revoked his prior sentence and imposed a ten-year prison sentence for felony escape, 

03/22/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0124
with no time suspended, which had been recommended by both parties. The court awarded 

credit for jail time served and street time. 

We conclude that Sparks has made a plausible argument for an out-of-time appeal 

from his relatively recent judgment under the Rules of Appellate Procedure. M. R. App. P. 

4(6). Sparks has indicated that he is without counsel to represent him. He may be entitled 

to representation of counsel. Section 46-8-104, MCA. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Sparks's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellate Defender Division is APPOINTED 

to represent Richard Wayne Sparks. The Appellate Defender Division shall have thirty 

days from the date of this Order within which either to file a Notice of Appeal or a Motion 

to Rescind this Order Appointing Counsel. In the event that Sparks qualifies for appointed 

counsel, the Appellate Defender Division shall immediately order the appropriate 

transcripts, if they have not been already ordered. 

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the 

Appellate Defender Division, hto counsel of record, and to Richard Wayne Sparks. 

DATED this day of March, 2022. 

2 

Chief Justice 
94 

Justices 

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERNEST WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 58 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
 Date: March 25, 2008
    /s/ Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLCGeneral Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LPGeneral Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of FFLC Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Paul K. Mueller, Executive Vice
President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350,
as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the report.


Date: March 11, 2004                    By: /s/ Paul K. Mueller
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Paul K. Mueller, Executive Vice
                                               President and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       42
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 13082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IAP Research, Inc.: Electromagnetic Dynamic 
Compaction

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 15, 2000, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IAP Research, Inc.: 
Electromagnetic Dynamic Compaction has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing a change in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Ideas & 
Inventions, Anderson, IN has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IAP Research, Inc.: Electromagnetic 
Dynamic Compaction intends to file additional written notification 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On July 21, 1999, IAP Research, Inc.: Electromagnetic Dynamic 
Compaction filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of 
the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal 
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on December 14, 1999 (64 
FR 69799).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-5063 Filed 3-1-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in a real estate joint
venture.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance sheet is
unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying unaudited
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,684,078
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,371,005<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,293,573<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,371,005<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,616<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,971<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                378,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            378,645
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   378,645
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.97<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include an investment in
unconsolidated partnership of $14,677,503.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of $77,432.
<F4>Total revenue includes equity in earnings of unconsolidated partnership of
$368,306 and other revenue of $33,310.
<F5>Other expenses cosist of general and administrative expenses.
<F6>Represent net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

Opinion issued June 3, 2021

In The



## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 2 1 - 00 278 - CV

——————————— IN RE J - M MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., ANDREA JEAN THOMPSON , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF TRACY DEA N THOMPSON, DECEASED , AND MANDY THOMPSON ZORN , Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, J

- M Manufacturing Company, Inc ., Andrea Jean Thompson, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Tracy Dean Thompson, and Mandy Thompson Zorn, have filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the May2

24, 2021 Order Regulating Jury Trial entered by the Honorable Mark Davidson , presiding pre

- trial judge for asbestos multi

- district litigation cases
. 1 We deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Guerra, and Farris
.

1 The underlying case is Andrea Jean Thompson, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Tracy Dean Thompson, Deceased, and Mandy Thompson Zorn , Cause No. 201 8

- 10109 , in the 11th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Mark Davidson presiding pre - trial judge for asbestos multi

- district litigation cases
.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2714

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to recipients of the Medal

of Honor eligibility for medical and dental care furnished by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 22, 1993

Mr. ROWLAND (by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to recipients of the Medal of Honor eligibility for medical and

dental care furnished by the Department of Veterans

Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That sections 1710(a)(1)(H) and 1712(a)(3)(B) of title

4 38, United States Code, are each amended by inserting

5 ‘‘or a veteran who is a recipient of the Medal of Honor’’

6 after ‘‘World War I’’.

Æ
<PAGE>




                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2005

                           By:    /s/ Barry Mindes
                                  ----------------
                                  Barry Mindes
                                  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00163-CV

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, Relator §

§

§

§

Original Proceeding

From the 96th District Court

of Tarrant County (096-298884-18)

September 3, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and holds 

that the petition should be conditionally granted. Accordingly, we conditionally grant 

the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to vacate its May 26, 2020 “Order on 

Plaintiffs’ Supplement to Motion to Compel Discovery Responses.” Our writ will 

issue only if the trial court fails to comply.

It is further ordered that real parties in interest Lamont Frawley and Mary K. 

Frawley shall pay all of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue. 
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
[Nos. 58423-5-I; 58890-7-I.

Division One.

September 24, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Raymond D. McCoy, *Appellant.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 06-1-01623-4, Gregory R Canova, J., entered June 23, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-5049]



[[Page 12929]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, March 9, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-5049 Filed 2-27-01; 11:04 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
# Serotype - User Notes

# FY2023_Q1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7033

JOSHUA ALLEN BOLEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro, Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00513-LCB-JEP)

Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Bolen, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Allen Bolen seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, 

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that 

the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bolen has not made

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2608 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 132

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2608

                          [Report No. 103-241]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to conduct 
                the quarterly financial report program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 15, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                 Union Calendar No. 132
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2608

                          [Report No. 103-241]

To make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to conduct 
                the quarterly financial report program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

   Mr. Sawyer (for himself and Mr. Myers of Indiana) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Post Office and 
                             Civil Service

                           September 15, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to conduct 
                the quarterly financial report program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That, effective as of September 30, 1993, section 4 of Public Law 97-
454 (13 U.S.C. 91 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2022

- 3546

_____________________________
K EANDRE L ANELL W ESLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. March 5, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B ILBREY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China International Tourism
Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Xiaojun Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Xiaojun
Wang
 Xiaojun
Wang
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 Date:
November 14, 2008
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.