alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the undersigned officer of Chase Packaging Corporation(the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| May 12, 2010 | /s/ Ann C. W. Green                             |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|              | Ann C. W. Green                                 |
|              | Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary |
|              | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    |

 

1

----
## Take action

                  -   Report fraud
                  -   Report identity theft
                  -   Get your free credit report
                  -   Get consumer alerts

## The Latest in Consumer Advice

## Articles

ArticleHow To Avoid Scams When You Shop for a Home Security System December 20, 2023Offers ways to spot and avoid scams when shopping for a home security system.

ArticleTimeshares, Vacation Clubs, and Related ScamsDecember 20, 2023If you’re thinking about buying a timeshare or joining a vacation club, make sure you know exactly what you’re getting into.

ArticleInvention Marketing ScamsDecember 17, 2023
Dishonest invention marketers lie about the profit potential of your invention to get you to pay for expensive, but often useless, se

All articles

## Consumer Alerts

Consumer AlertIdentity theft happens in every community, so get help in your languageLarissa BungoJanuary 29, 2024Identity Theft Awareness Week is a great time to learn how to spot, avoid, and report identity theft. Chances are, you know someone who has experienced identity theft. That’s when someone uses your personal or financial information without your permission to commit fraud. It can happen to anyone, in any community. So how do you get help in your language?

Consumer AlertYour right to get information about funeral services by phoneAlvaro PuigJanuary 25, 2024Whether you’re making funeral arrangements for a loved one in another state, or simply can’t or don’t want to meet with the funeral provider in person to learn about the goods and services they offer, the FTC’s Funeral Rule gives you the right to get accurate information over the phone. FTC investigators recently discovered many violations of the Funeral Rule, including some providers that didn’t give accurate price information over the phone and others that didn’t give out any price information over the phone.

Consumer AlertIdentity Theft Awareness Week 2024 starts January 29Colleen TresslerJanuary 25, 2024You’ve probably heard about identity theft, but have you heard about Identity Theft Awareness week? That’s when the FTC and its partners host free podcasts, webinars, Facebook Live interviews, and other events to talk about how to spot, avoid, report, and recover from identity theft. Mark your calendars. Identity Theft Awareness Week starts Monday, January 29!

All consumer alerts

How to Report Fraud at ReportFraud.ftc.gov

Visit Money Matters

December 13, 2022

## Get consumer alerts

### Report to help fight fraud!

Protect your community by reporting fraud,scams, and bad business practices.

Report fraud

### Pass It On

The truth is that sharing what you know can helpprotect someone who you know from a scam.

Share now

### For Military and Veterans

Defend yourself against fraud and stay financially secure with tools and resources for service members, veterans, and families.

### Consumer.gov

Consumer protection basics... plain and simple.

### Order Free Resources

Order free publications for consumers and businesses.

**Return to top
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Buckhead Community
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report ), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350
United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2008 
|                       
|/s/ Marvin Cosgray     
|Marvin Cosgray         
|Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2563

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-

6-dodecyl-4-methylphenol, branched and linear.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 30, 1993

Mr. CALLAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on 2-(2Hbenzotriazol-2-yl)-6-dodecyl-4-methylphenol, branched

and linear.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2-(2H-BENZOTRIAZOL-2-YL)-6-DODECYL-4-

4 METHYLPHENOL, BRANCHED AND LINEAR.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following new subheading:
2

HR 2563 IH

‘‘ 9902.31.12 2-(2Hbenzotriazol-2-

yl)-6-dodecyl-4-

methylphenol,

branched and

linear (provided

for in subheading

2933.90.37) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/94 ’’.

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the fifteenth day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 16, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:                

*1.  Southern Community Bancorp*, Orlando, Florida; to retain 50 percent equity interest in Southern Community Banc Mortgage, LLC, Longwood, Florida, and thereby continue to engage in brokering loans, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 26, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-5021 Filed 3-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2748 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2748

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 3 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Small Business Development Center Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 21(c)(7) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) is 
amended by striking ``system which will'' and by inserting in lieu 
thereof the following: ``system. Subject to amounts approved in advance 
in appropriations Acts, the Administration may make grants or enter 
cooperative agreements with one or more centers to carry out the 
provisions of this paragraph. Said grants or cooperative agreements 
shall be awarded for periods of no more than five years duration. The 
matching funds provisions of subsection (a) shall not be applicable to 
grants to cooperative agreements under this paragraph. The system 
shall''.
    (b) Section 25(i) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 652) is 
amended by striking ``$8,000,000 for fiscal year 1993'' and by 
inserting in lieu thereof ``$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1993, 
1994, 1995, and 1996''.
    (c) Section 223 of the Small Business Credit and Business 
Opportunity Enhancement Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 986) is amended by 
striking the last sentence of subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              |   |                          |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|              |   |                          |   |
| Date: May 6, 2010 | By:    | /s/ James R. Ingebritsen |   |
|              |   | James R. Ingebritsen          |   |
|              |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|              |   |                          |   |
SF-2809 EXAMPLE

APPENDIX B
11/13/2023-12/11/2023.

833-840-9217

11/13/2023

APPENDIX B
#### Scott SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., an Oklahoma corporation; and Dwight Baker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-15000.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 17, 2014.*

Filed April 2, 2014.

Robert P. Spretnak, Esquire, Law Offices of Robert P. Spretnak, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

*482Kelly A. Evans, Chad R. Fears, Esquire, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, Mary-Christine Sungaila, Snell *&*Wilmer LLP, Costa Mesa, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: WALLACE and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and GETTLEMAN, Senior District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *482*See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Robert W. Gettleman, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Plaintiff Scott Shoemaker appeals from the district court’s summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for improper blacklisting, defamation, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and civil conspiracy against defendants Dwight Baker (“Baker”) and (under a theory of *responde-at*superior) Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc. (“Northrop”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review the district court’s summary judgment *de novo. Obsidian Fin. Group, LLC v. Cox,*740 F.3d 1284, 1288 (9th Cir.2014). We shall not recite the factual or procedural record in this case, with which the parties are familiar. The undisputed facts in the record establish that after plaintiff was fired by Northrop he was no longer permitted to access his former unit’s computers, folders or files. Baker’s report that plaintiff had in fact accessed the unit’s computer system was accurate and thus not defamatory. *Unelko Corp. v. Rooney,*912 F.2d 1049, 1057 (9th Cir.1990). Indeed, as found by the district court, Baker and Northrop had a duty to report plaintiffs unauthorized access, and were conditionally privileged to do so. *See Bank of Am. Nev. v. Bourdeau,*115 Nev. 263, 982 P.2d 474, 475-76 (1999). Consequently, defendants committed no wrongful act that could subject them to liability for tortious interference with contract, prospective economic advantage, or civil conspiracy.

Finally, the district court correctly concluded that the Nevada statute under which plaintiff based his claim, Nev.Rev. Stat. § 613.210, is a criminal statute that does not confer a private right of action for blacklisting.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# AMR - User Notes

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cvm-gfi-152-evaluating-safety-antimicrobial-new-animal-drugs-regard-their-microbiological-effects

# FY2022Q1

# FY2022Q2

# FY2022Q3

# FY2022Q4
Exhibit 32.2





Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Gregory Krzemien, the Principal Financial Officer of Mace Security International, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of Mace Security International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “December 31, 2010 Form 10-K”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o(d)) and information contained in the December 31, 2010 Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mace Security International, Inc.





Dated: March 30, 2011





/s/ Gregory M. KrzemienGregory M. KrzemienPrincipal Financial Officer and Treasurer
Rehearing granted by order filed 7/3/00; unpublished opinion issued 3/3/00 is vacated.UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6015

EDDIE JAMES HARVEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-99-910-3-22BC) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie James Harvey, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICEOF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Eddie James Harvey seeks to appeal the district court’s orderdismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 12, 1999. Harvey’s notice of appeal was dated December 20, 1999, and filed on December 22, 1999. Because Harvey failed tofile a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Monday, March 5, 2001.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: February 23, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-4905 Filed 2-23-01; 4:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Donald G. JONES, Appellant v. Bobby JINDAL, Governor, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-7124.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 10, 2011.

Donald G. Jones, Fayetteville, GA, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 23, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint because a pro se plaintiff may not file a *qui tam*action pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. *See Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. U.S. ex rel Stevens,*529 U.S. 765, 769, 120 S.Ct. 1858, 146 L.Ed.2d 836 (2000) (either the federal government may bring a civil action against the alleged false claimant, or a private person (the relator) may bring it in the name of or on behalf of the federal government; the United States is the real party in interest). Moreover, the district court properly dismissed the complaint because it failed to comply with the “short and plain statement” pleading standards articulated in Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). *See U.S. ex rel. Williams v. Martin-Baker Aircraft Co., Ltd.,*389 F.3d 1251, 1256 (D.C.Cir.2004) (discussing Rule 8(a) dismissal of *qui tam*action).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.