Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 1 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M332 FPLFood {27BA8E36-B359 

-425C-AF5D-87F 

457A688CA} 

ACA1509 

012813N 

-1 

01/13/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 9CFR 313.1 (a) Livestock pens, driveways, and ramps 

shall be maintained in good repair. They shall be free from 

sharp or protruding objects which may, in the opinion of 

the inspector, cause injury or pain to the animals. Loose 

boards, splintered or broken planking, and unnecessary 

openings where the head, feet orlegs of an animal may be 

injured shall be repaired. At approximately 0605 today, 

while performing AnteMortem Jnspection, I obseNed the 

following noncompliance atEstablishment M332 FPLFood: 

A bull had his head trapped in an opening between the 

metal pen bars. His body was in Pen 15 and his head was 

in Pen 16 which contained cows. I immediately stopped 

AnteMortem Inspection. Plant emptoyees were not able to 

free his head. I immediately requested a supeNisor; (t;,/ 16\ 

and (b} (6) 

arrived. The cows in Pen 16 

CLOSED 

were released to another pen and the bull was humanely 

euthanlzed. The bull did not appear to have sustained 

injuries. (b) {6) consulted with plant maintenance 

workers to eliminate the opening. The pen gates were 

secured to ma.ke the pen unaccessable to hold cattle until 

repairs are made. This is noncompliant with CFR 313.1 (a) 

as an unnecessary opening entrapped the animal''s head 

and could have caused injury. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 2 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M332 FPLFood fB 18.80984-6996 ACA0213 01/27/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 9CFR 313.1 (a) Livestock pens, driveways, and ramps CLOSED 

-4288-ABA9..\39B 012327N Humane Handling shall be maintained in good repair. They shall be free from 

33B4677F1} -1 sharp or protruding objects which may, in the opinion of 

the inspector, cause injury or pain to the animals. Loose 

boards, splintered or broken planking, and unnecessary 

openings where the head, feet orlegs of an animal may be 

injured shall be repaired. At 

approximately 0535 today. while perfomiing AnteMortem 

Inspection atEstablishment332M, FPL. Food; I observed 

the following noncompliance: .A steer had his head trapped 

in an opening between the metal pen bars. His bddy was 

in Pen 21 and his head was in Pen 22which contained 

cows. I immediately stopped AnteMortem Inspection. I 

immediately requested a supervisor, plan! employees were 

notable to free his head. (b) (6) 

and(b) (6) 

arrived. The cows in Pen 22 were released to 

another pen and the steer was humanely euthanized. The 

lateral and ventral aspects of !he right mandible appeared 

to be swollen. (b) {6) consulted with a plant 

maintenance supervisor to eliminate the opening. The pen 

gates were secured to make the pen unaccessable to hold 

cattle until repairs are made. This is noncompliant with 

CFR 313.1(a) as an unnecessary opening entrapped the 

animal's head and may have caused Injury. The same 

occurrence of the failure ofEstabLishment 332M to prevent 

discomfort and distress by having an unnecessary opening 

where the head, feet, or legs may be injured is 

documented on NR #ACA1509012813N/1 dated 

01/13/2021 . The establishment's previous preventive 

measure was not implemented or did not prevent 

occurrence ofthe same noncompliance. Continued failure 

to comply with regulatory requirements may result in 

further regulatory or admtnistrative actions. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 3 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M332 FPLFood {079197D2-A8F4 ACA2715 03/12/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 9CFR 3 13,2(e)) CLOSED 

-48DA-BlEC-14 033212N Humane Handling Animals shall have access to waterJn all holding pens and, 

D2808D9B98} -1 if held longerthan 24hours, access to feed. Al 

approximately 0855 March12, 2021, at M332 FPL Food, 

LLC, I observed the following noncompliance during Ante 

Mortem Inspection: At 0855 I found thewater trough in the 

unloading pen contained no 

water. 

Although this pen is normally used to unload cattle, 

when I observed the animals, the pen was being used as a 

holding pen for Pen 23 cattle because no plant employees 

were in the area actively unloading animals. the cattle had 

been held,in the pen for30 minutes. and most ofthe 

animals were at rest laying on the floor. Also, pen 16was 

moved to the unloading pen for30 minutes while 

antemortem was being performed and no Waterwas 

presentat thattime. I immediately took tequlatory control 

by notifyinq (b) (6) 

and she called fora Supervisor. I tagged 11,, lfi~ the water trouqh with US Rejected tag#B41502346. 

arrived at the barn. She called a 

plantmaintenance employee who removed the automatic 

waterer, and waterflowed into the trough. She assured me 

thatall the watertroughs in the barn would be checked. I 

removed the US Rejected tag. 

M482 SL Croix Abattoir {85A2E79A-A74A NAA5013 03/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 On March 22, 2027, at approximately 8:55a.m., <bi 1"' OPEN 

-4334-BFSC-883 033222N Humane Handling observed a farmer ~b) ( 6) ) delivering 

CB1890B01} -1 three sheep for slaughter at t e St Ctoix Abattoir. ~)Ho, 

was ins1de the abattoir in. the knocking box area 

and saw the incident through the window. Plant employees, 

including (b} (6) an.ct (b) (6) were,in the pen area When the sheep were being 

delivered. The farmer unloaded the animals a11d was 

observed pulling. the first animal (a large ram) by his ears 

through the alleyway and into pen #4. No one stopped the 

farmer. (bb (6) notified (b ) (6) of the 

incident. ( ) (6) wentoutslde and notlfied the plant 

employees that pulling an animal byits ears was not 

allowed. The establishment's Humane Handling Program 

dated February 2, 2021, includes that the firm: "Shall 

mlnlmize exdtement and dtscomloit of livestock durin.9 

movement. Uvestock shall not be kicked or pushed.'' and 

··shall prevent injury ofnvestock during movement by 

movlng livestock ata normal walking speed." {b) (6) 

notified ~b) (6) that this NR wou1d be issued. The 

establls menttailed to meet 9 CFR 313.2 (a). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April .5, 2021 4 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M18731+P18 

731+V18731 

Towson Cold 

Storage 

{45680028-BEE0-

4EAB-A073-FOD 

860097291} 

UMA221 

0032824 

N-1 

03/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.16(a)(1) On Tuesday March 23, 2021 at approximately 1 :00 PM at 

Towson Cold Storage Establishment# M18731, IPP 

observed a humane handling non-<;ompliance during 

routine slaughter ofhogs. The empl.oyee responsible for 

stunning attempted to render 1 sow unconscious with a 

gunshot (sow continued standing). Establishment took 

immediate -corrective action by applying 2 shot by gunshol 

Sow was rendered unconscious. and establishment applied 

3 shot by captive bolt to perform safety shol The animal 

did notvocaJize. Tag number #14988596X was applied to 

the stunning area and slaughter was halted. On postmortem 

inspection the skinned head was examined, and two 

distinct points ofentry were identified. IPP notified 

Supervisor and District PHV. After pos.1rnortem and review 

District PHV Instructed to remove tag and issue NonCompliance. Non-compliance violates regulation 313.76 (a) 

(1 ). Plant management was notified ofthis non-compliance 

both verbally and in writing. 

CLOSED 

M18867 Macelo Central 

S.E.lhC. 

{44886F80-7141-

47DF-8C65-EBS 

687E2.5A56} 

IJA15050 

21802N1 

02/01/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.2 Today, at 071 0 hours. while performing PHIS Task 

Humane Handlfng - Review and Observations at the animal 

pens, I noticed one pen with approximately 10 p1glets that 

did not have access to water. On the Hoor there Was an 

empty water bowl and the pen did not have an automatic 

watereras the res! ofthe pens have. Plant management 

was notified of this noncompliance immediately in order to 

implement appropriate corrective actions. The pen Was 

Rejected with US Tag B37405997. This finding is a 

nocompliance wtth US Regulation 9 CFR 313.2 (e) that 

states: "(e) Animals shall have access to water Tn all 

holding pens and, ifheld longer than 24 hours. access to 

feed. There shall be sufficlent room Jn the holding pen for 

anfmals held overnight to lie down." Failure to comply With 

regulatory requirements could result ln additional 

regulatory or administrative action (b) ( 6) 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 5 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M6590 Randolph 

Packing Co., Inc. 

{679'19DB6-E8F7 

-414D-BE47-786 

ED8FBE978} 

YBB0009 

013114N 

-1 

01/13/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) At approximately 13":19 on 1/13/2021 I was approached by 

(b) (6) regardin_g a humane handllng·violation. 

She reported observing a cow standing and moving,in the 

floor area where stunned animals are hoisted onto the rail, 

lnsp. (b) (6) also observed that an employee delivered an 

immediate and effective stun using a hand-held captive 

bolt. I' arrived and found a Holstein cow was prone and 

appeared insensible. When I arrived, Greg Dronen, the 

plant manager, was present and questioned the lead 

knocker aboutthe Incident. He reported that the cow was 

initially knocked using the pneumatic captive bolt device on 

the front ofthe skull. The cow reportedl'y collapsed after 

the application of the pneumatic c<1p!ive bolt and rolled out 

of the box when the side panel to the hoisting Hoar was 

raised and then stood up. He came down immediately 

from the knocking position with a hand-held captive bolt 

device and applied it immediately and effectively to the poll 

of the cow. This incident represented a violation of9 CFR 

313.15(a)(1), however after consultation with (b) (6) 

no further action is being taken. 

Mr. Dronen suggested the corrective action ofresuming 

active procedures to confirm correct stunning by observing 

each animal's eyes and ears for appropriate proofof 

successful use of the captive bolt, including the loss of a 

corneal reflex as needed. Mr. Drone said he would 

CLOSED 

implement this plan immediately and sustain itfor a week. 

M6720 Martin's Pork 

Products, Inc. 

{908BFB04-1144 

-468C-8F1D-981 

F7C8E9609} 

AVA4905 

015514N 

-1 

01/14/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandlin_g 

313.2 At approximately 6:25am, on 01/14/2021, while performing 

the Ante Mortem inspection of the Livestock Humane 

Handling task. the following noncompliance was observed:. 

Two pens of hogs in the barn were observed to not have. 

water availablein the. holding pen. Regulatory control 

action was nottaken due to an en,ployee belng on hand to 

handle the situation. (b} (6) . was 

notified ofthe noncompITance and the failure to meet 

regulatory requirement 9 CFR313.2(e). 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 6 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M18079+P27 

232 

Smithfield Fresh 

Meats Corp. 

{14764247-CM0 

-44M-BA90-4E7 

64B1DA994} 

VFB0515 

023822N 

-1 

02/22/2021 04C02 

ane Handling 

313.2 Atapproximately nss while verifyinq HATS category V 

(Suspect and Disabled), I ((b) (6) ) observed 

animals held for veterinary disposition with no access to 

water. The animals were located in the segregation pen 

near theB -side carbon dioxide ohambers, and there were 

a total .of 5 animals in the pen. All employees in that area 

had1left for lunch. The pen contained two separate water 

lines and both lines were turned off. I nolified (b) (6) 

ofthe issue and informed him that they were in 

noncompliance with 9 CFR 313.2(e). The valve lever 

bandies used to open the water lines were missing. '''·"' 

had to contact maintenance for pliers. to open the 

lines. All animals in the pen were able to rise and ambu.late 

and were passed for slaughter. The animals had access to 

water by 1158. As further planned actions, the 

establishment elected to re-train all 1st shift employees 

assigned to that area (including supervision) on checking 

the accessibility of water when placing any animals in 

pens. The re-training started today and is expected to be 

completed by the end of the week. 

CLOSED 

M18079+P27 

232 

Smithfield Fresh 

Meats Corp. 

{9B0D6B09-FE3 

C-4813-86EF-01 

D4E261BF0F} 

VFB0514 

034623N 

-1 

03/2.3/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.1 ,'313.2 At approximately 1425 whOe verifying HATS category VI 

(Electric Prod/Alternative Obj'ect Use), I (b) (6) 

) observed a humane handling noncompliance. In 

the driveway leading to the outside carbon dioxide 

chamber on A-side. I observed the establishment 

CLOSED 

employing a cut gate With no roller while moving animals to 

the carbon dioxide chamber. The cut gates are used by the 

establishment to assist 1h mafntatning manageable groups 

or cuts of animals when moving them to the carbon dioxide 

chamber. The cut gates are equipped with a roller atthe 

end. When passing between the.gate and the wall, the 

roller prevents an animal from belng pinned agalnst the wall 

by the gate and beinq1njured while the gate is closing. I 

nolified (b) (6) . and (b) (6) 

of the establishment's fanure to comply wlth 9 CFR 

313.2(a) and 313.2(c). The establishment elected to 

discontinue the use ofthe gate until itcould be equipped 

with a roller. I observed no Injured animals as a result of 

this issue. 

M8547+V854 

7 

Champlain Beef 

Company ,Inc. 

{897B3255-8899-

404D-98FS-F E9B 

01B6E47C} 

PRO2106 

023310N 

-1 

02/10/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 At 07:10 hours while performing odd hour inspection the 

observed livestock pen closest to the sfaughter floor did not 

have any water. The pen had approximately 30 livestock 

presentatthe time of the obse1vance. A plant employee 

was notified ofthe noncompliance with 313.2(e). The 

employee made appropriate corrective action and made 

water available to the livestock. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 7 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Ta.sk TaskName Regs Description Status 

M17776 Trenton Halal 

Packing 

Company 

{FSD58046-BD2 

A-4D73-A90D-2F 

F56EC86A7F} 

BBE1912 

022801N 

-1 

02/01/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 At 11:45am on 2/1/2021, While conducting a Livestock 

Humane Handling review and observation task atTrenton 

Halal (Est 17776), I, (b) {6) , inspected the 

establishment holding pens during goat and lamb slaughter 

operations and observed the following:Approximately 20 

lambs had no access to water. since they were separated 

and enclosed in a different pen section with no water 

container. These 20 tambs were there at least 30 to 40 min 

CLOSED 

with no water, from the time they were unloaded off the 

truck. This is a humane handling non-compliance of9 CFR 

313,2(e) since the establishment failed to provide the 

animals access to water in the holding pens. Once the 

humane handlinq non-compliance was found, 11

') 161 

was informed ofthe 

non-compliance, who then immediately took corrective 

actions providing water to the affected livestock. 

M17965 Gold Medal 

Packing tnc, 

{E8F11468-B038 

-4169-A 1 F1-DF1 

330A6ED60} 

JRF0106 

020909N 

-1 

02/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.2 CATEGORY III WATER AVAILABILITYOn 02/09/21, at 

approximately 0630 hours, Wh11e performing 

Ante-Mortem, I, (b) (6) observed multiple bob 

veal located In the smaller ramp section usual!y designated 

for dead calves. Two of the Three veal in the area were stlll 

CLOSED 

alive. The area had no water available for the animals.The 

non-compliance is a violation of 313.2(e), HandOng of 

Livestock, which states-" Anfmals shall have access to 

water in all holding pens and, ifheld lon_ger than 24 hours, 

access to feed There shall be sufficient room in the holding 

pen for animals held ovem1qht to lie down ."I notified 

(b) (6) &(b) (6) 

of the forth-coming NR for corrective action. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 8 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Ta.sk TaskName Regs Description Status 

M17965 Gotd Medat {C7DC445FsDAA JRF4609 03/31/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) At approximately 8:15.am, while performing a HATS OPEN 

Packing Inc. F-4777•9ECE-BD 035131N Humane Handling category VIII stunning effectiveness task, myself,""••• 

C57703E746} -1 • and (b) (6) observed a hog that 

was being stunned using a .38 pistol firearm. When the 

plantemployee said they were going to shoot I moved into 

!he adjoining room with MrDave Anguzza (establishment 

manager) and (b) (6) for safety. Before leaving the 

area, the hog was observed by (b) (6) to be standing 

parallel to the blood chute directly facing the ladder to 

climb up to the hide wash station. The hog was not 

restrained. The hog was rapidly shot in the head two Limes 

with the .38 handgun. Approximately 5 seconds passed 

before a third shot was fired. We allowed approximately a 

minute to pass before examination to ensure that there 

were notgoing to be continued shots for persona) safety. 

Atthattime, the hog was observed standing 12 yards from 

the original location. It had moved around the blood chute 

and back onto the kill floor. It was standing steadily with the 

top of his head even with his back. There was no droop in 

the neck or unsteadiness in its stance. The establishment 

did nottake corrective actions as described in their 

corrective action plan. Normalty, this establishment either 

uses a hand-held captive bolt as a backup device for veal 

or a secondary electric shock for pigs buta pig of this size 

has never been slaughtered here before (>900#). The PHV 

anct(b} (6) moved back into the safety area and two 

more shots were taken.w ith a 9 mm handgun (reportedly a 

successful shot and a safety shot). I, the PHV, determined 

after these secondary shots that the pig was unconscious. 

I allowed theunconscious hog to continue tllrough the 

slaughter process and there were no other animals in the 

pens for slaughter today. The hog chute and the calf 

stunning chute were tagged with US Rejected tags 

#843780160 and #B43780159 to stop any continued 

slaughter. I verbally notified Mr. Dave Anguzza, 

Establishment Manager, ofthe decision to take a 

regulaloi)' control action lopre.vent the slaughter of 

'

0 animals. I advised Mr. Anguzza that I was contacting" 

, our humane handling veterinarian atour district 

office, about possible enforcement action due to ·an 

egregious humane handling noncompliance and thatthe 

District Office would be following up with a written 

suspension or NOIE letter to the establishment 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 9 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description St atus 

M20403 American Halal {8CD4E519--0BE PID2413 02/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 On Monday Februaiy 22.nd, 2021 atapproxi.mately 1005 CLOSED 

Meat Inc. F-4885-ACDF-8D 023322N Humane Handling hours, I was walking·through the barn to check on the 

2FA26E76D2} -1 animals when I saw a heifer's hind leg was caught on the 

upper portion of the gale in the chute and the heifer was 

recumbenl I observed as they attempted to remove the 

heiferfor 2 minutes and the heifer beqan to vocalize 

continuously. I got the (b} (6) to come 

to the barn and view the heifer. After he confirmed with me 

that the heifer was in distress I instructed him to look for'" '' 

. When (b) (6) returned. I stated that the heifer needs to be humanely 

euthanlzed due to'itbeing in pain and no resolution. 

Around 1015 hours Cahit Camak, plant manager. came 

with the captive bolt and talked to the truck driverabout 

placement ofthe captive boll on the'heifer's head. The first 

shotwas an effective stun. and a security shotwas 

followed about7 minute after. After the security stun, an 

employee cut the heifer's throatlo allow it to bleed oul I 

explained to Mr; Camak-and (b) (6) that this is a 

noncompliance in regards to the heifer being caught on the 

gate. The failure to recognize thatthere was a hazard that 

can injuiy to an animal is a noncompliant with the 

regulatory requirements of9 CFR 313. 1(a). 

Rhode Island {275EOD9C-1CF VEL0007 01/26/2021 04C02 313.1 Humane Handling Category VII: Observations for Sllps and CLOSED 

Beef& Veal Inc. 

M5300 Uvestock 

2-4383-BE20-122 015526N Humane Handling Falls; On 1 /26/21 at approximately 0704 whne conducting 

42AEDF568} antemortem the folfow1ng noncompliance was observed: 

The kiil fioor lead presenting the livestock for ante-mortem 

assisted w1th unloading the sheep and cattle from the trailer 

tnto the first pen. During the movement 3 cattle sl1pped in 

between the pen landing on its front legs. Ofthe 3 cattle 

one struggled to gain traction to stand back on its feet. The 

kill floor lead then went to get a few buckets of saltand 

salted the pen to help treat and preventthe slipperiness in 

the pen. The establishment lead was also notified ofthis 

finding and a noncompliance would be documented. 

-1 

MS497+VS49 Adams Farm {580AA995-561 D FWJ171 03/15/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 This morning, alapproximately 0700 hours, While in the CLOSED 

] Slaughterhouse -4130-9F88-C2C 1031615 Humane Handling barn to perform antemot:tem I observed the following: 1) the 

LLC A9C592AFF} N,1 second section of fencing between pens 1 and2 had 5 

bars (out of 6) broken and sticking out into pen 2. 2) the 

smaJI door that is on the side ofthe corral has a space 

about3 inches taJI that extends from end to end from where 

a piece broke off, 3) one of the panels in the corral is 

broken down toward the bottom leaving a hole about 12 

inches wide by 3 inches high. Atthe time I observed the 

noncompliance there were no animals in either pen nor in 

the corral. I informed (b) ( 6) of these findings Visually, 

verbally and with this notice. I took regulatory control 

action and applied retaih tags No. B41286081, 841286082, 

841286083 and 841286084 to the abovemenLioned areas. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 10 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M6785 BEF Foods, Inc. {D7FOC48E-9C3 NRL0406 01/13/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 On 1/13/2021 at approximately 10:00 am while in the barn CLOSED 

7-4419-BC73-13 011114N Humane Handling observing and verifying HATS Cateoorv VI Electric 

564AB2CCE9} -1 Prodding/Alternative ObjectUse, 1,(b) (6) 

observed the following non-comp'liance. I observed an 

establishment employee excessively paddling a sow on her 

back in the old scale house. I observed the employee raise 

the arm holding the rat~e paddle above his head and 

forcibly paddle the sow in a rapid sequence four times 

repeatedly on her back. The sbw did not move into the 

chute in response to the handling. Upon observing,this 

non-compliance I asked the employee to stop what he was 

doing. I then took regulatory control by asking the 

employee electrically stunninq the sows to stop. I then 

found the(b) (6) and 

informed him of the observation, I also informed him that 

the establishment would receive a non.compliance record 

as a result ofthe observed non-compliance. A few minutes 

later I was informed by10 >C&I that the employee who was 

involved in the non-compliance had been moved to another 

job position non-humane handling related for the remainder 

of the day. I then returned regulatory control back to the 

establishment atapproximately 10: 1 Oam. The 

establishment was non<omplianl with 9 CFR 313,2(b). This 

document serves as a written notification that continued 

failure to meet regulatory requirements can lead to 

enforcement action as described rn 9 CFR Part 500.4 

M7464+P746 F.B. Purnell {D7456350-022A CMN400 01/06/2021 04C02 Livestock 31330(a)(1). HATS category VIII: stunning effectiveness While C•LOSED 

4 Sausage Co.. -4357-9580-6SA 8011406 HumaneHandling 3U30(a)(3) performing the livestock Humane Handling Activities 

Inc. D48D6D749} N-1 Tracking System (HATS) task at Purnell Sausage Co. 

(M7464) Sfmpsonvllle. KY, the following observation was 

made atapproxirnately 0830 hrs. EST by the (b ) (6} 

: A suspectsow in the holding pen ofthe 

barn was obsetved being electrically stunned with the 

portable electric stunner; the establishment uses a 

head-then-heart application ofthe wand, Establlshment 

personnel applied the wand to the.neck ofthe sow s1Uing in 

a sternal position; when the wand was removed for 

placement on the heart, the sow was obseived sensible 

(conscious eye-tracking). Thewand was again placed on 

the neck of the sow; the sow went lateral recumbent and 

was again observed sensible (conscious eye-tracking) and 

rolled back to the sternal positiori (conscious rightin~ 

reflex), Establishment personnel applied the wand multiple 

times (6) to the head andheart until the sow was rendered 

insensible; at one point the sow was heard vocalizihg as 

well. The SVMO immediately took a regulatory control 

action and applied U.S. Rejected taq #B45-422669 to the 

restralner;{b} (6) was 

informed of the a·bove observation and regulatory control 

action, as well as documentation ofthe non..compliance. 

The chain of command was notified for furtber guidance. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 11 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M7464+P746 F.B. Purnell {EB971 B7F-D81 CMN221 03/26/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS category Ill: water and feed availability While CLOSED 

4 Sausage Co., E47F9-8348-12 0032126 Humane Handling perfomiing the Livestock Humane Handling task al Purnell 

Inc. 08F700F392}. N-1 Sausaqe Co. (M7464) Simpsonville, KY(b) (6) 

made the following observations: Al 

approximately 0900 hrs. EDT IPP (inspection program 

personnel) advised the SVMO two suspect sows in the 

alleyway otthe holding pens required ante-mortem 

inspection; the sows were passed for slaughter as 

suspects with. disposition pending post-mortem inspection. 

The sows had a 3-gallon red plastic bucket in proximity with 

water. Establishment personnel were informed the suspect 

sows were passed for slaughter. At approximately 1115 

hrs. EDT the above suspect sows were still inthe alleyway. 

in the same location, in the same position (one sternal 

recumbent. one sitting upright), but without access to 

water; the red bucket was observedlying on its side. The 

estaWshment had ceased slaughter activity al 

approximatery-1100 hrs. EDTforlunch.(b) (6) 

was informed of the above observation and the 

forthcoming non-compliance record. 

M8078+P807 Boone's Abattoir, {83DDCCBA-781 APMS10 03/31/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS category 111: water and feed availability While CLOSED 

8+V8078 Inc. D-4FSE-8FC8-FF 6033231 Humane Handling performtng the Livestock Humane Handling task at Boone's 

69D3B67D03} N-1 Abattoir (M8078) Bardstown, KY (b) {6) 

and•t·,1o1 

observed the followfng at approximately 0740 

hrs. EDT: A hog in.pen #6 was found without access to 

water. The orange tub in the pen was observed upside 

down and there was no water flowing from the hose ln the 

elevated water trough; the animal was dellvered to the 

establishment the previous day. Establishment personnel 

was informed of the above observation as was 

establishment ownerJerry Boone, who was likewise 

informed of non-complfance with 9 CFR 313.2(e) and the 

forthcoming documentation. 

M9112+P91 1 Hometowri {lA0630SB-F22C EJO4411 01/28/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1), On 7/28/2021 while performing the Humane Handling CLOSED 

2 Butcher 4994-A73E-2FE 013428N Humane Handling Verification Task underHATS Category 8 at Hometown 

878087789} 

313.16(a)(3) 

-1 Butcher, an ineffective initial shot was delivered with a 22 

magnum at 10:45 CT which did notrender the animal 

insensible to pain. (b) (6) , after hearing 

the first shot, entered the slaughter floor and witnessed the 

sheep still standing and the sheep.actively pulled its head 

outofthe headgate. (b) (6) also 

Witnessed thatthe movement of the sheep was restricted 

within the squeeze chute. The stun operator delivered an 

immediate and effective corrective action stun with the 22 

magnum and rendered the animal insensible to pain. and It 

remained so thereafter. The chute was rejected with tag 

number B45241236. The plant owner, Mr. Stone, was 

notified ofthe noncompliance. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 12 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M4271+P427 GREISE {50837828-1ASA CZFS213 01/04/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) HATS Cateqory VIIIOn 114/21 at approximately 11:50 am I, OPEN 

1+V4271 BROTHERS -4FD1-BC4F-FE 010304N Humane Handling (b) (6) while observing the Human 

PACKING INC. ED7FAE488A} -1 Handling stunning effectiveness task, observed a missed 

stun ofa bull by using the stunning method with a .410 

firearm. The bull was brought down and placed 

into the chute. No head restrain! was used in the stunning 

process. (b} {6) stated that he was aboutto fire 

the first shot while I walked into the cooler to wait I heard 

the shot fired and opened the door. As I start to walk 

through the door(t,) (~1 shouted security shoL I hurried to 

close the door and heard the second shot fired. 

Atthis time, after the second shot was fired, I noticed the 

bull still was not properly stunned. I was able to see its 

head moving through the gap between the rotating metal 

wall ofthe chute and the head restraint portion ofthe 

chute. I went over to the gutroom door as the third shot 

was fired. The bull still was not stunned asCb) C6l was 

preparing to take a fourth shotwhich was ineffective. tb) ca\ 

fired a fift'h shot finally rendering the bull unconscious. He 

then proceeded to open the chute to allow the bull to fall 

into the pit where (b) (6) stuck it. It took roughly five 

minutes in total from the first shot until the final shot was 

taken. I waited to make sure there was no sign oflife 

before I went to getmy supervisor and tagged off the chute 

with 837604788 at approximately 12 pm. The establishment 

does nothave a robust systematic approach. Because of 

the egregious nature of the incident, I am recommending a 

suspension of slauqhter activities. I notifiedibl CS) 

. (b) (6) , and (b) (6) that I 

would be contacting my supervisor and the district office at 

approximately 12 pm. 

-

M4271+P427 GREISE {EFF0F0C3-24A CZF3611 03/0912021 04C02 Uvestock 313.2 Hats Category Ill. Water and Feed Availability On March CLOSED 

1+V4271 BROTHERS D-4C95-96C1-FD 033710N Humane Handling 9, 2021, at approximately 915hours, l,(b) (6) 

PACKING INC. 13DEB24A70} -1 while performing Antemortem lnspection duties 

obsetved 6 beef in pen '#5 without any source of water. 

{b) (6) was verbally notified ofthis noncompl1ance 

This NR serves as the establlshments failure to comply with 

9Ci::R313.2(e). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 13 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M7415+P741 HOFFMAN'S {46FD1 F71-7ED1 YUN3204 03/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1, 313.2 On 3/2/2021 atapproximately 0610 hours, while performing CLOSED 

S+V7415 QUALITY MEATS -4A88-8FA6-50B 030203N Humane Handling a Livestock HumaneHandling task, I, 

F2CMOD01} -1 , observed 13 market beef for (b) ( 4) in the 

holding pen closest to the alleyway leading to the knock 

box. The pen contained one blue poly barrel cut in half 

and used as a watertrough. The barrel was completely 

empty and dry on the bottom, indicating no water had been 

presented recently. This is non-compliant with 9 CFR 

313,2(e) which states, ''Anim,;1ls shall have access to water 

in all holding pens and, ifheld Jonger than 24 hours, 

access to feed. There shall be sufficient room in the 

holdinQ pen foranimals held overnight to lie down." 

• was verbally notified. 

When asked about the lack ofwater, he told me he had just 

transferred the animalsto that holding ,pen so they would 

be easier to move up the alleyway and had simply forgotten 

to fill up the barrel butdid mention that the animals had 

water overnight in the pen from which they 'justcame. My 

food inspector corroborated the story since he had 

witnessed them in the other pen during AM inspection. I 

also observed anolher partially filled halfcut blue poly 

barrel in the pen from which they came. (b) (4) 

attempted to fill the first bucketwith water, however, due to 

the below freezing temperatures, the water hose was 

partially frozen and slow running. Therefore, he decided to 

open the gate to allow the animals back into the pen from 

which they recently came in orderto gain access to 

water. As he did, the animals began to move on their own 

without pushing or prodding. All went smoothly until the 

final two animals, which startled and changed direction 

quickly to foll'ow their contemporaries. When doing so, the 

first slipped and fell onto its left hip with its sternum and 

front knees also touching the ground. It rose quickly, 

seemingly withoulinjury. The last animal• hastily followed 

and proceeded to lose footing and slip, only touching a 

hockto the ground before regaining footing. This is 

non-compliant with 9 CFR 313.1(b) which states, "FloorS of 

livestock pens, ramps, and driveways shall be constructed 

and maintained so as to provide good footing forlivestock. 

Slip resistant orwaffled floor surfaces, cleated-ramps and 

the use of sand, as appropriate, during winter months are 

examples ofacceptable construction and maintenance; ' 

When all animals had moved, I entered the pen to assess 

the texture of the flooring. Th'e flooring was slick with wet 

manure, yet when scraped away with my boot heel, did not 

provide sufficient traction, even with my slip resistant 

footwear. Another noteworthy observation occurred as I 

was entering the pen. Two animals headed directly to the 

water barrel and be,gan drinking intently and undeterred, 

even though I was standing less than live feet away •in an 

open gateway, indicating their level ofthirstwas significant 

Additionally, priorto the animals switching pens, I had 

observed the floor drain cover in the center of!he pen was 

dislodged and instead oflying flat across the drain, was 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 14 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

lying perpendicular and in an upright fashion. This caused 

one animal to step into the open drain and another to have 

the dislodged drain cover impact directly between the two 

hooves of its right rear foot as it was navigating toward the 

open gate. Nerther animal appeared to be injured by the 

incident. however, the above findings related to insufficient 

flooring increase the likelihood' of aninjured or downed 

animal, which according to 9 CFR309.2(b) and 309.3(e), 

cannot be.presented for slaughter ifnon-ambulatory. I 

requested a meeting in the USDA office with Mr. Michael 

Trippett, President and GM of Hoffman's Quality Meats 

(M-7415) at 0930 hours to apprise him of the 

non-compliant humane handling observations. Mr. Trippett 

and I discL:15sed the need for both ,long-term (concrete 

etching, rebar grid overlay) and short-term (rubberized stall 

mats, sandy/gritty material) preventive measures that we 

bad seen work in otherfacilities. Fora sho1Herm solution, 

Mr. Trippett chose a product called (b) (4) from the 

local supply store. It is a crushed limestone material used 

to provide traction. Shortly after our meeting, Mr. Trippett 

procured four bags from the supply store, appUed the 

product, and instructed employees on proper usage, 

particularly around high traffic areas. FSIS will closely 

monitor and verify the effectiveness·ofthe establishment's 

prescribed short-term corrective actions and requests 

notification when longer-term solutions are decided upon. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 15 

Est Nbr EstName N R Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M7415+P741 HOFFMAN'S {E01 E9FC1-63A6 YUN3411 03/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1, 313.2 On 3/23/2021 at approximately 1040 hours, while OPEN 

S+V7415 QUALITY MEATS -4945-B4FE-4B0 032723N Humane Handling perfomiino a Livestock Humane Handling task, I, " "' 

6EEAC0E10} -1 ..observed lwo market hogs in the 

holding pen closest to the alleyway leading to the knock 

box. The pen c-onta.ined one blue poly barrel cut in half 

andu sed as a watertrough. The.barrel was approximately 

1/3 full ofwater, however, the barrel sides were 'too tall to 

allow the market hogs access to drink from iL Additionally, 

a separate hog was in an individual stall (#4) without 

access to water. A black rubber tub had been pushed 

under the gate into the alleyway and was completely 

empty. This 'is non-compliant with 9 CFR 313.2(e) which 

states, "Animals shall have access to water in a.II holding 

pens and, If held longer than 24 hours. access to feed. 

There shall be sufficient room in the holdinQ pen for 

animals heJd overnight to lie down."(b } (6) , was verbally nottfied. When asked about 

the lack ofwater. he told me he had provided water to the 

hog in stall #4 in the black rubber tub previously but that it 

must have spilled ii. Given that this is a recurring Livestock 

Humane Handling non-compliance and will be assoi;:ialed 

with another recent non-compliance for lack ofwater 

availability (YUN3204030203N. dated 3/3/2021). it would 

be advantageous for management to consider other 

measures to avoid further non-compliance. Furthermore, 

as I proceeded with my Livestock Humane Handling task, I 

encountered four market beefdestined for slaughter on 

3/24/2021 for Whole Foods i(l the ''now L-shaped" holding 

pen that connects to the loading .ramp and runs adjacent to 

the old scale. The reason I say, "now L-shaped" ,is 

because the cattle rubbed the gate off its hinges, which 

had been previously tied up to the fencing in the pen. 

However, it was now lying in the pen covered in manure 

with exposed metal bolt ends pointing upward in direct 

opposition to the cattle's feet. Additionally, the metal 

hinges were left exposed as protruding objects in a 

high-traffic area and turningpoint between pens. Also 

observed within the portion ofthe holding pen nearest the 

loading ramp was a bundle of eight wires draped down 

from the ceiling, across the pen, to within approximately 

2 1⁄2 feetof the floor, thereby posing a threat of 

entanglement or electrical shock to the four beef currently 

in the pen. The above observations are non-compliantwith 

9 CFR 313.1(a) which states. "Livestock pens, driveways 

and ramps shall be ma.intained in good repair. They shall 

be free from sharp or protruding objects which may, in the 

opinion ofthe inspector, cause injury or pain to the 

animals. Loose boards, splintered or broken planking, and 

unnecessary openings where the head, feet, orleQs of an 

animal may be injured shall be repaired."(b) (6) . and Plant Manager, Gene Rhodes, were 

verbally notified of the aforementioned non-compliances, 

Plant Co-Owner, Michael Trippett Plant Manager, Gene 

Rhodes, and (b) (6) , are 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 16 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description St atus 

hereby notified in writing ofthis Lfvestock Humane 

Handling non-compliance. 

M7882+P788 Horst Meats {780D0D2A-1 DE IMM4412 01/06/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) While performtng post-mortem inspection at Horst Meats CLOSED 

2 1-4AA3-B4D8-11 014106N Humane Handling on01/06/2021 atapproximately1.241 hours, 1. (b) (6) 

SF454E4CB6} -1 , observed the folloWing humane handling 

noncompliance. (b} (6) , 

realizing that he had an exceptionally excited animal in the 

knocking area, decided to defer to a more experienced 

employee. to do the knockihg with the1r usual handheld 25 

caliber captive bolt stunner. This employee then attempted 

Lo stun the. animal, a large Angus heifer, but alter this first 

knocking, the animal remained consdous; itwas still 

standfng and vocalizinA with[n the knocking area. 

lmmediately.{b) (6) reloaded the deviceand 

attempted to stun the animal again. This time the animal 

dropped tothe floorbut again the attempted stun did not 

achieve loss ofconsciousness; the animal again vocalized 

and was moving about(b) (6) and another 

employee then holsted the heiferfrom the rear limbs with a 

chain while 1t was still conscious and administered a third 

stun With a secondharidheld captive bolt that was effective 

tn rendering the animal unconscious. (b} (6) and 

myself agree that the animal was consclous while being 

hoisted due. to vocalization. (b) (6) states that he 

hoisted the.an1mal to get control of itin order to administer 

the.effectivefast stun. Closerexamination ofthe skull 

revealed 3 holes; one high and off lo the right. one off 

center to the right and one slightly off center lo the left. 

Taking more than one stunning attempt to achieve 

unconsciousness and hoisting a consaous animal 

represent a noncompliance with regulatfon 9CFR 

313.1S(a)(1), Which states: "The captivebolt stunners shall 

be appliedto the livestock in accordance with this, section 

so as to produce immediate. unconsciousness tn the 

animals before they are shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast, or 

cut. The animal shall be stunned in such a manner that 

they will be rendered unconscious with a minimum of 

excitement and discomfort." (b} (6) was notified 

ofthe noncompliance and the fact that an NR would be 

tssued. U.S. Rejected Tag No. 838884027 was applied to 

the knock box atapproximately 1300 hours. The 

establishment does not have. a robust systematic approach 

lo humane handling. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 17 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M10804+P10 Wagner Meats, {5E1A74A3-B49 IWC0908 01/21/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) While performing a hurnane handling verification task at CLOSED 

804 LLC. D--4BAA-9E20-F9 015821N Humane Handling Wagner Meats on 01/21/2021 at approximately 0850 

D1035AE549} -1 hours, I,(b) (6) , observed the following humane 

handling noncompliance. After a heifer was run into the 

knocking area on the kill fi.oor, an establishment employee 

attempted to stun the animal with their usual .22 caliber 

rifle. They fired a shot, the animal dropped to the ground,. 

the qate to the knockinq area was opened, and (b) (6) 

, immediately prepared to hoist 

the animal. Since I was standing just outside the doorway 

to the kill floor while they were using the firearm, I entered 

the kill floor to inspect the animal to assess stunning 

effectiveness. As I walked closer to the animal, I noticed 

that it was rhythmically breathing, blinking, and tearing 

excessively, suggesting that the animal remained 

conscious. (b) (6) ,was already 

beginning to hoist the rear limbs of the animal. As he was 

hoisting, I saw the animal's eyes· tracking movementand 

tested it's palpebral and corneal reflexes, which were 

intact. The heifer was still rhythmically breathing as well. I 

yelled over the sound ofthe kill floor equipment to John 

Murphy that the animal can nolbe hoisted and that it 

needed to be stunned again. He instructed the employee 

who performed the stunning lo get the gun and stun it 

again. While the gun was being retrieved, (b) ( 6) 

rnntinued to hoist the animal several more feet so thatthe 

head was notresting on the ground. The animal was 

stunned a second time with the same firearm, and 

unconsciousness was achieved, Closer examination ofthe 

skull revealed 2 holes; one significantly offcenter to the left 

side ofthe sku.11 and one in the center ofthe appropriate 

area to achieve an effective stun. Taking more than one 

stunning attempt to achieve unconsciousness and hoisting 

a conscious animal represent a noncompliance with 

regulation 9CFR313.16(a)(1), which states; ''The firearms 

shall be employed in the delivery ofa bulletorprojectile 

into the animal jn accordance with this section so asto 

produce immediate unconsciousness in·t11e animal with a 

single shot before itis shackled, hoisted. thrown, cast, or 

cut. The animal shall be stunned in such a manner that 

they will be rendered unconscious with a minimum of 

excitement and discomfort." ( b) (6) was notified 

of the noncompliance and the fact that an NR would be 

issued. U.S. Rejected Tag No. B24794527 was applied to 

the knock box at approximately 0853 hours. The 

establishment does have a robust systematic approach to 

humane handling in place.This NR is being linked to 

IWC5210114516N-1 and IWCS512112702N• 1, which were 

recentsimilar failures to stun with a firearm. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 18 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description St atus 

M19252+P19 

252 

Farm2Table 

Meats LLC 

{003E1B37-CBA 

4-458F-B739-6F4 

F0095A659} 

IHC2808 

023919N 

-1 

02/17/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 HATS Category I: Inclement Weather, 9CFR313.1 (b)On 

February 17, 2021, atapprox. 0749 hours, 1,(b) (6) 

during the performance of an 

Ante-Mortem inspection oflivestock, observed ice on the 

floor of the Aisleway leading from the livestock pens to the 

staging pen and inside the staging pen (which leads 

directly inlo the slaughter floor knockinQ box). I 

immediately informed (b) (6) 

of the non-compliance. He immediately applied 

salt on all the surfaces that had ice. I reinspected at 0751 

hours approx. and the action acceptable (the floors were 

gritty and provided good footing). No regulatory control 

action was ta.ken due to no livestock being affected and the 

corrective action was immediate.This NR serves as 

notification of the estabLishment's failure to comply with 

9CFR313.1(b). 

CLOSED 

M19252+P19 

252 

Fann 2Table 

Meats LLC 

{10698FAE-3741 

-447B-B17C-A09 

86EEF61C7} 

IHC2110 

031804N 

-1 

03/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.1 HATS CATEGORY •JV: Ante-Mortem Inspection, 

9CFR313.1(a)On March 2, 2021 , I, (b) (6) 

during the performance ofAnte-Mortem llvestock 

inspection (at approx. 0758 hours), observed the bottom 

board on the left. as you enter, Pen#3, 

was unattached from the rear post exposing the nails. in the 

post & one nail in the board pointing inward toward the 

lfvestock (1 beef) in pen. I immediately notlfied(b) (6) 

of the non-compliance. She 

immediately moved the 1 beef out of the pen and into the 

staging pen. I tagged (US Reject tag #B43223890) Pen#3 

and lnformed (b) (6) that no livestock was permittedin 

pen #3 until ft was properly repalred and verified by USDA 

IPP. I also, notified Mr. Mike Shreve (Plant Manager) of 

the non-cornpliance and the.immediate actions taken by 

{b) (6) .This NR serves as notification ofthe 

establlshrnent's failure to comply with 9CFR313.1 (a). 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 19 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M85B Swift Pork 

Company 

{8CA0CFFD-3AC 

8-44F1-9B 1 S-9C 

4C6D1 FA0B2} 

GYM362 

3015418 

N-1 

01/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) Category VIII - Stunning EffectivenessOn January 18, 

2021 , at approximately 18:18, while performing Humane 

Handling Tasks (Category V - Suspect and Disabled and 

Category VIII - Stunnin_g Effectiveness) in the livestock 

barn, I observed the following noncompliance. I saw a 

group of employees in subject pen #2 attemptingto stun a 

hog that was in lateral recumbency and appeared poorly 

responsive. A front-end employee applied a captive bolt 

gun to the hog's head and fired. In response to the captive 

bolt discharge, I heard the hog squeal and simultaneously 

the hog quickly rai.sed itself to a sitting position and 

remained sitting on its hind legs and looking around. I 

could see a bloody wound on the hog's head slightly above 

the eyes. The hog remained sitting and moving its head 

with its eyes open. Then the front-end employee picked up 

a second, already loaded. captive bolt gun and placed itto 

the hog's head and fired. In response to the second 

discharge, the hog immediately fell into a laterally 

recumbentposition and was unresponsive, I observed as 

the employees verified that the hog was unconscious. 

(b) (6) arrived shortly after the hog 

had been rendered unconscious and I explained to him 

what I had observed. J informed (b} (6) that a 

noncompliance record would be created. Failur.e to 

produceimmediate unconsciousness in animals when 

stunnino is a noncompliance with 9 CFR 313. 1 S (a)(1 ). 

(b) (6} stated that he would follow up on the 

situation with the employees. 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 20 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M85B Swift Pork {CC8484D6-.876 GYM022 02/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 Category lt-1ruck Unloading On February 18, 2021, at OPEN 

Company 8-4480-8835-395 3023319 Humane Handling approximately 13:20, while performing Humane Handling 

48CS12606} N-1 Task (Category II - Truck Unloading) in the livestock barn. 

I observed the following noncompliance. While observing 

unloading ofthe top deck ofthe trailer atDock 2. I saw the 

dnver was driving a group of hogs down the ramp toward 

the bottom floor of the trailer. The hogs were still near the 

top ofthe ramp when I observed a hog near the edge of 

the ramp, toward the center of the truck, step sideways 

and move its body toward the edge ofthe ramp. As the hog 

began to move sideways, I noted that the gate, which 

usually rests against the edge of the ramp and confines the 

hogs to the ramp, was not against the ramp and not visible 

to me. The hog then stepped sideways off 1:he side ofthe 

ramp and fell, from very near the top ofthe ramp, to the 

floor in the bottom ofthe trailera distance ofapproximatety 

three to four feet I then 1ost sight ofthe hogs on the ramp 

and on the floor, as I moved to get the attention of 

personnel to stop furthernnloading. When I approached 

the trailer more closely, I noted that a hog was silting near 

the bottom ofthe ramp andappeared unable to rise. This 

hog was euthanized by the estabLishmeot Noinjuries were 

apparent on this hog. I was later informed that the hog that 

fell had already run outofthe trailer by the time I arrived at 

the trailer. I was informed by (b) ( 6) 

thatemployees would secure the gate alongside the 

ramp and hold itto make certain it remained in place While 

the remaining hog was unloaded from the trailer. I 

observed as the establishment employees pushed the gate 

up to the ramp, and held itin place, while the final hog from 

the top deck of the trailer was unloaded. The hog falling 

from the ramp to the floorof the trailer, while being driven 

for uoloadinq, is a noncompliance with 9CFR 313,2(a). I 

informed (b) (6) and (b) (6) 

thata none-0mpliance record would be created. They 

informed me that the incidentwas being investigated a1Jd 

the establishment would be developing further corrective 

actions based on the findings. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 21 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M17496 Tri Eagle {6716A 1C3-6583 QNISSHJ 03/15/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2(1), HATS Categmy VJII-Stunning Effectiveness On March 15, CLOSED 

Provisions, Inc. -454D-9C64-C59 035615N Humane Handling 37 3.30(a)(3) 2021 at approximately 0830 hours while performing 

7D93031F3} -1 stunning effectiveness verification as part of the Humane 

Handling Verification task (b) (6) observe the following 

egregious noncompliance. One.large market hog was 

electrically stunned and moved out ofthe restrainef to !he 

automatic incline bell to the shac:kl[n.g station, which is 

approximately 6 feetin length. The hog immediately 

voca.lized upon dropping onto the,incline belt loud enough 

to be heard. The hog was paddling its front legs while in 

lateral recumbency and vocalized a second time just a few 

seconds later. On the third vocalization the hog was atthe 

shackle table. The shackler was in the process of 

preparing to place the shackle on the hind leg ofthe hog. 

Upon the fourth vocalization (b) (6) halted the 

stunning process due to the lack of immediate action being 

taken by the stunner or shackler to address the hog. '""" 

drew attention to the hog thatwas exhibiting signs 

of consciousness. Atthe time the process was stopped the 

sticker, who was sticking hogs on the overhead rail 

approximately 15 feet away, was summoned immediately 

by (b) (6) to address the hog. The hog continued to 

exhibit signs of consciousness until appropriately captive 

bolt stunned. After the hog was captive bolt stunned the 

vocaliz.ation ceased and the hog was shackled and stuck 

as normal. (b) (6) explained to the lead employee In 

the area what had happened and thatthe remaining 

conscious hogs in the system at the entrance to the 

restrainer could nol'be electrically stunned and would need 

to be addressed by other means. The lead employee after 

some further discussion effectively captive bolt stunned the 

remaining animals in the system and those animals were 

allowed to proceed through the system to being shackled 

and stuck. US Retain tag number B-45238008 was placed 

on the restrianer. The establishment management Steve 

Meier. Plant Manager; Steve Lilovich, PlantOwner; and 

(b) (6) were notified ofthe 

failure to comply with the regulatory requirements of9 CFR 

313,2(1), 9 CFR 31330(a)(3). and 9 CFR 313.30(b)(1).9 

CFR 313.30(b)(1) reads:(b) Facilities and procedures; 

operator- (1) General requirements for operator. Itis 

necessary that the operator atelectric current application 

equipment beskilled, attentive. and aware ofhis or her 

responsibility. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 22 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M17D+P761 Smithfield {8E92FSS0-1EFD WLJ271 01/30/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 HATS Category VI - Electric Prod/Alternative Object OPEN 

3+V17D Packaged Meats -4228-BE4F,.,24C 4012830 Humane Handling UseOn 01/30/2021 atapproximately 1553 hours, whlle 

Corp. 919583AFA} N-2 verifying HATS Category VI, I noted the following 

noncompliance. l observed a (b) ( 4) room employee using 

a sort board and rattle paddle driving hogs towards the 

circle pen just priorto the(b) (4 1 room alleyways. He was 

raising the rattle paddle above shoulder heightand bringing 

it down forcefully on the dorsum of multiple hogs, The hogs 

thatwere hit moved quickly away from the stimulus and 

several vocalized in response. I immediately instructed for 

the employee to stop hitting the hogs so hard and began 

looking for a supervisorin the area As I did notsee a 

supervisorin the immediate area, I continued to observe 

the employee as he moved several more groups of hogs 

without excessive force. Afterwatchino for several more 

minutes, I found (b) (6) and 

informed him of the forthcoming noncompliance report. 

While he wentto speak with the employee, I went back to 

the USDAoffice to speak with(b) (6) 

to receive the 

immediate corrective action,This is noncompliant with 9 

CFR 313.2. 

M17D+P761 Smithfield {F27017C5-ESC6 WU271 01/30/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS Category Ill - Water and Feed Aval!abilityOn OPEN 

3+V17D Packaged Meats -462B-BDA2-739 4012830 HumaneHandlin9 01/30/2021 atapproximately 1240 hours, while performing 

Corp, E3F98D202} N-1 HATS Category IVAntemortem Inspection. I noted the 

followfng noncompliance. The pen checklistfor Pen 1, 

which is used for resale hogs, indicated that the last timeit 

had been checkedwas 0615 hours on 01/29/2021. No 

other information was written on the form. I asked (b) (6) 

when the last round of 

resale hogs had been plcked up. The pen checklist was 

filled out by an employee soon after the resales were 

picked up on 01/29/2020.Aller that point. the first hogs to 

be p1aced in Pen 1 were unloaded at approximately 062.5 

hours. After review of the resale records from 01/29/2021 , 

it was noted that there were 31 hogs within the resale pen 

that had been on sitefor morethan 2.4 hours whe.n the 

noncompliance was discovered. The pen checklists from 

01/29/2021 and from 01130/2021 did notindicate that the 

hogs had been fed, and the night shift barn manager 

tnfonned (b) (6) that they had notfed the hogs. No 

feed was visible in the pen, and no one on day sh1f\ had 

fed the hogs. I informed (b) (6) ofthe forthcoming 

noncompliance. He indicated that he would immediately 

begln working on corrective actions and went to make sure 

the hogs were fed.This is noncompliantwith 9 CFR 

313.2(e). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 23 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M17D+P761 Smithfield {AB0CEB03-589 WLJOSO 03/25/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1, 313.2 HATS Category VI - Electric Prod/Alternative Object Use OPEN 

3+V17D Packaged Meats 6-42D4.-B343-F8 3032626 Humane Handling At approximately 0144 hourson 3/26/2021 at the 

Corp. 6540B4D685} N-1 conclusion of the stunning operations in the(b) (4) (oom 

for the second shift starting on 3/25/2021. I observed the 

following non-compliance. As I entered the(b) (4) room 

from the South end, I heard a hoq vocalized excessively. I 

noticed the East and West(b) (4) drive alleys were almost 

empty ofhogs. As I approached the North end ofthe East 

(b) (4) drive alley, I observed a standing hog todged atthe 

midsection behind the East Sliding Wall (final gate that 

slides forward driving the hog into the(b) (4) gondala 

basket) and the housing for the East PD Gale (the final 

automatic dividing gate ofthe East(b) (4) drive alley}. The 

hog was standing and excessively vocalizing whilst having 

its midsection lodged between the South edge ofthe East 

Sliding Wall and the Northern most point of the EastPD 

Gate housing. Establishment employees immediately 

engaged the East Sliding Wall moving it forward effectively 

freeing the hog. The hog immediately ceased vocalizing 

and sat down on its hind end (dog-sitting position). No 

outwardly injuries could be observed on the 

hog. Establishment employees immediately rendered the 

hog insensible bv a hand-held captive boltdevice. I 

informed (b) (6) of the 

forthcominq non--compliance report. After discussions with 

both (b) (6} and (b ) (6) . corrective actions were given. This is 

non-compliant with 9 CFR 313.1 and 9 CFR 313.2 

M253 Long Prairie {94BDA7EE-7BD AGL4311 02113/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 At approximately 0915 hours on 2/13/21, while performing CLOSED 

Packing, E-43F7-B197-03 024715N Humane. Handling Odd Hourinspection in the barn, I observed the following: 

Company, LLC 58523E7 A22} -1 There was a group of cows 1n pen 34. Pen 33 was empty. 

Tt,ere was no steam rising from thewaterer that is used for 

both pens, so I went into pen 33 to look at the waterer. l 

found that the water was froze over arid the cattle did not 

have access to the water. There were no employees in the 

barn atthe time. so I informed the guard at the guard 

shack ofthe frozen waterer and the guard lmmediat~ly 

called maintenance ofthe frozen waterer. On 2/15/21 at 

approximately 0900 hours I informed (b) (6) 

ofthe forthcoming 

noncompliance With regulation 9 CFR 313.2(e), which 

states animals shall have access to drinkable water in all 

holdin_g pens. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 24 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M2460+P246 

0 

Cimpl's, Inc. {8A42634B,73F1 

-418B-A5B2-16D 

E3FDA412C} 

PMB31 1 

2025310 

N-1 

02/10/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On 2/10/2021 , at approximately 1105 hours while 

performing HATS task cateqory IV Ante-Mortem 

Inspection. I ({b) (6) ) observed 15 animals 

exiting Pen # 1 returning to Pen #15, the lastanimal (a red 

angus cow) turned to exit the pen and slipped and fell onto 

her left side. The animal immediately rose again with no 

visible injury and exited the pen. I observed a thin layer of 

bedding ir.this pen.Atthis time I· ceased Ante-Mortem 

inspection. I requested (b) (6) 

to the barn. While waiting for(b) (6) 

one of thebarn employees retrieved a bucket of 

hay/bedding and dumped and spread it around in the pen. 

When (b) (6) arrived I informed him ofmy 

observations. (b) (6) entered the pen and observed 

the area where the animal had fallen. Atthis time I allowed 

Ante-Mortem Inspection to resume. There were no like 

observations forthe remainder ofAnte-Mortem Inspection. 

After Ante-Mortem lnspeGtion was completed (b) (6) 

informed me that he would take Pen #1 out of service and 

have it cleaned so as to get a better observation of the floor 

surface and determine what needed to be done to prevent 

a recurrence of slips/falls. This finding is not in compliance 

with 9CFR313.1 (b). 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 25 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M7627+P762 North Dakota {325E02DA.-QAD RDl2914 02/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category VIII -Stunning EffectivenessAl CLOSED 

7 State University 3--40BB-A9CE-01 022822N Humane Handling approximately 0705 hours, while observing HATS Category 

Meal Laboratory C889SC6808} -1 VIII.-Slunning Effectiveness, I observed lhe following 

non,compliance: An establishmentemployee attempted to 

stun a heifer wilh a hand-held captive boll device. The first 

attempt was ineffective as the heifer remained conscious. 

The heifer vocalized immediately aflerthe hand-held 

captive bolt was fired. continued blinking and remained 

standing. The establishment employee •immediately 

reloaded the hand-held captive bolt and attempted a 

second stunning procedure. After lhe second attempt. the 

animal remained conscious and continued vocalizing, 

blinking and standing. Blood was observed coming out of 

the nose ofthe heifer as well as a wound approximately 

halfway between lhe eyes and nose oflhe animal. A third 

attempt with the same hand-held captive bolt device by the 

same employee and the anima.1 remained conscious, 

continued vocalizing, blinking and standing. The 

establishment interim manager then disassembled. 

reassembled and reloaded the hand-held captive boll The 

nextattempt to stun the animal was made by the interim 

plant manager. Upon firing the hand-held captive bolt while 

the bolt was in contact With the animal's head, lhe stunning 

round inside the captive bolt misfired. The hand,held 

captive boll was reloaded with a new stunning blank and on 

the next attempt (fifth), the animal was rendered insensible. 

showing no signs of consciousness. Immediately after 

determining the unconsciousness of the heifer, I placed a 

U.S. Reject taq #A3120201 on the restrainer and informed 

(b) (6) , (b) (6) , ofmy 

observations regarding the plant employee's inability to 

render the animal unconscim.Js after multiple stunning 

attempts. (b} (6) and I lhen observed the skuH ofthe 

heifer. Three holes, approximately less than orequal to a 

baitinch below the brain were observed. showed evidence 

thatall three holes missed the brain.A fourth hole was 

observed approximately 1" above the other lhree holes. I 

verballyinformed (b) (6) ofthe forthcoming 

non-compliance record and that the establishmentfailed to 

render the animal immediately unconscious with the first 

application of the captive bolt stunner .and failed to meet the 

regulatory requirements of9 CFR 313.15(a)(1). f notified 

the establishment that I would be contacting lhe Des 

Moines District Office through supervisory channels for 

further guidance regarding possible enforcement action. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 26 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M7717+P771 

7+V7717 

White's 

Wholesale Meats 

{E9F55F39-897 A 

-4C66-AE19-25C 

88E90EE49} 

JLl59120 

15919N1 

01/19/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category Ill (Water and Feed Availability) On 

01/19/21 at approximately 0805 hours while performing the 

Livestock Humane Handling Verification task in the pens 

for HATS Category Ill (Water and Feed Availability), I 

observed the following non-compliance. I observed the 

metal stock tank in Pen 1 was frozen over. The tank heater 

CLOSED 

was not in the stock tank but was lying on the ground 

outside the pen. The water was iced over with 

approximately 1⁄2 - 3⁄4 inches thick sheet of ice on the top. 

There were 5 steers and 2 heifers in Pen 1 at the time of 

this observation. Not having water available for livestock on 

premise does not meet the requirements of 9 CFR 

313.2(e). I immediately notified plant manager Ben White 

of the non-compliance. The immediate corrective action 

by the plant was to break the ice in that stock tank. I then 

verified the establishment's corrective action was sufficient 

to allow the livestock accessibility to fresh water. I notified 

plant manager Ben White both verbally and in writing with 

the issuance ofthis NR. There are no associated NRs for 

the same root cause within the last 90 days. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 27 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M8971+P897 R Four Meats fO6167EAB-0209 DBJ0212 02/01/20:21 04C02 Livestock 313.1, On 211/:21 , while I was verifying HATS Category OPEN 

1+V8977 -4E21-9776-33E 024002N Humane Handling 313.1 S(a)(2), VIII - Stunning Effectiveness. while the establishment was 

B75E36C17} -1 313.1S(b)(1) 

(iii), 313.2 

attempting to sum the third bovine of five presented for 

antemortem inspection, I observed the following 

noncompliance: The third beefwas captured in the 

restrainer. as it entered for the third time, by (b) (6) 

;(b) (6) touched 

the beef with the electric prod while trying to load itinto the 

restrainer. The beef wasobserved to be excited as it 

moved faster than a normal walking pace, was looking 

around in all directions quickty, was open mouth breathing 

very hard and vocalizing loudly. It attempted to jump 

through the top ofthe restrainer as it approached !he front 

of the restrainer. When itcame down its right front hoof 

slipped between the metal tubular bars ofthe restrainer and 

the wall 'thalis a few inches away from the restrainer.,.,.' · 

was at!empting to stun thebeef with a hahd-held 

captive bolt stunning device when the beef was able to free 

its leg which caused its hair to be scraped away from its 

leg by the metal tubular bars ofthe restrainer. After the 

animal was humanely rendered •unconscious and bled, I 

observed an area on the right front leg approximately 5 

inches long and 4 inches wide that was missing hide. The 

wound went from its hoof across the fetlock joint on its right 

front leg. I also observed multiple tufts of hair on the 

ground in the area where its foot became stuck in the 

restrainer. I ,informed Mr. Remme ofmy observations with 

the ahimal's ,leg, I pointed out the area ofconcern on the 

animal, and that ! would be contacting my (b) (6) 

I applied U.S. Reject tag #833621140 to 

the restrainer, I informed ( b) (6) that a noncompliance 

would be issued. After Mrs. Connie Remme, establishment 

owner, provided verbal preventative measures, I 

relinquished my regulatory control action by removing the 

U.S. Reject tag. 

M244L+V244 Tyson Fresh {FF304FFE-B236 TWH261 01/28/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 , 313.2 On 1-28-21 I, (b) (6) , was performing CLOSED 

L Meats. Inc, -489E-AD10-763 2010128 Humane Handling antemortem inspection (HATS category IV) at 

28FA77960} N-1 approximately 6:15 am wheh I noticed a market hog in pen 

#1 Owith its head stuck between a gate and the wall. The 

animal was unresponsive bl..tt still breathing. The 

establishment employee accompa11Yillg me for antemortem 

immediately notified employeesto bring a captive bolt gun. 

The animal was humanely euthanized using the hand held 

captive bolt gun and the gate was opened. Pen# 1Owas 

emptied ofall animals and the broken gate was removed 

completely. The gate In pen #10 was broken and had 

been for several days, this allowed the gate to open 

completely and trap the affected animal. (~ (6) was present an arrived at the 

area atthe time thatthe animal was euthan1zed. I told him 

that I would bedocumenting this incident ln an NR. the 

condition of the faclltties caused entrapment ofthe animal's 

head, leadtng to distress and lack of access to water. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 28 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M86M Cargill Meat {C56DA597-B80 PAl3623 03/29/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 HATS Categoiy 111 Noncompliance Noncompliance OPEN 

Solutions F-4EAF-BD3F-87 035830N Humane Handling observed at approximately 1510 hours on 3/29/2021 at the 

C13461D40E} -1 yards. During the performance of routine antemortem 

inspection at the pens On Monday March 29, 2021 al 

approximately 1510 hours, I noticed that the watertrough 

supplying pens 1 Sb and 16was empty. The pens were 

filled during first shift and left about 125 heads of cattle 

without waler during a hot day. The atmospheric 

temperature,in Schuyler was about 78 deorees Fat this 

time. I showed my findinqs to ( b) ( 6) 

and (b) (6) who 

immediately began to• investigate the deviation. They found 

outthat the pipe carrying water to this trough was not 

turned. After itgot turned on, water was made available to 1 thecattle. (bl (6), 1 

" c•

1 and (b) (6) were 

informed of the forthcoming noncomplic1nce. This finding is 

noncompliant against Title 9 CFR 313.2(e). 

M24SC+v24 Tyson Fresh· {A3310ES7~1465- ZRG2020 02/10/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.'1S(a)(1) At approximately 18:20 on 2/1'0/'20:21 while performing the CLOSED 

SC Meats. Inc. 42CF-AABF-A 1 F 024811N HumaneHandling Humane Handling Category VIII - Stunning Effectiveness, 

0F907391S} -1 I.SPHV(b) (6) ,observedthefolloWing 

noncompliance: I' observed a steer enter the center-belly 

restrainer; an establishment employee attempted a head 

stun by discharging the pneumatic captive bolt. The first 

discharge ofthe pneumatic captive bolt was ineffective, 

and the steer remalned conscious, standing calmly with his 

head up and did notvocalize. I observed blood exuding 

from the steer's right nasal cavity. The (b) (6) 

• promptly gotthe backup 

pre-loaded hand-held c.aptive bolt device and applied a 

second. effective stun, rendering the anlmal unconsdous. I 

tagged the restrainer with theU.S. Reject Tag NO. 

B39764701 and halted production. I asked (b) (6) to 

radio the(b) (6) . so 

I could inform him ofmy observation.(b) (6) 

. gave me verbal corrective 

actions and preventative measures to prevent 

reoccurrence. I removed the U,S. Reject Tag and slaughter 

operations resumed. The skull was split on past-mortem 

exam. there was a confirmed hole that entered the. nasal 

cavily. Thehole entered the right nasal cavity, 

approximately 1⁄2 inch below and 1⁄2 tnch towards mldline 

from the right orbit. There was also a second stun wound, 

on midline approximately 2 inches above the eyes. This is 

noncompliant with regulation 9 CFR313.15(a)(1). I 

tnformed (b) (6) , ofthe noncompliance and the 

forthcoming noncompliance record for failure to render the 

animal unconscious on the first attempt. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 29 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M245C+V24 Tyson Fresh {1BBD2CF5-8EF ZRG0400 03/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1) Atapproximately 2108 hours on March 23, 2021, while CLOSED 

SC Meats, Inc. 0-454B-BB0C-B9 035924N Humane Handling performino the Humane Handling Category Vlll - (b) (6) 

55B47A8553} -1 , observed the following 

noncompliance:I observed a heifer enter the center-belly 

restrainer and after difficulties placing the pneumatrc 

captive bolt in place as the animal moved: the secondary 

team memberattempted a head stun by discharging the 

hand-held captive bolt gun. The first discharge of the 

pre-loaded hand-held captive bolt was ineffective, and the 

heifer remained conscious: the animal remained postured, 

head held up, blinking, looking around, although itdid not 

vocalize. I observed blood exuding from the location ofthe 

stun. The other establishment team member promptly used 

the pneumatic captive bolt device and applied a second, 

effective stun, rendering the animal unconscio4s. I then 

initiated a requlatory control action of stopping.the line, and 

, to radio for I asked t~ (6) 

the (b ) 6 , to the restrainer 

to inform of events that occurred. After this instruction, 

(b) (6) , arrived, 

and I explained the observations made that resulted in the 

line stoppage and informed establishment management of 

the forthcoming NR. The establishment then gave me verbal 

corrective actions and prevenlative measures to prevent 

reoccurrence. (b) (6) arrived, I explained the 

observations made. After discussing the issue with the 

establishment, production was resumed. Afterwards, the 

skull was split on post-mortem exam. there were two 

confirmed stun holes that entered were applied to the skull. 

One shot was center of the frontal bone, with complete 

penetration of the skull, while the secondary stun was on 

the off-center bottom-right ofthe frontal bone, angled right 

and it failed to penetrate deeply into the skull. l then 

showed (b ) (6) , and(b) (6) 

, my observations of the skull. 

This noncompliance record (NR) is being associated with 

NR-ZRG202020024811N documented on February 10, 

2021 for a similarincident with ineffective stunning with a 

stunning device in the restrainer. The previous corrective 

actions and preventive measures were either not 

implemented or not sufficient to prevent recurrence of the 

noncompliance. 
1

Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 30 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M969G Swift Beef 

Company 

{1 D450E72-3968 

-4B84-9D0F-1CE 

C952F8BEA} 

NDH3705 

021503N 

-1 

02/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) On 2/2/2021, at approximately 1401 hours, I,(b) (6) 

, performed a directed humane handling task at 

the stun box after observing approximately 6 heads railed 

outfrom the head rail for improper stun hole placement. I 

observed the primary stun operator apply an ineffective 

stun with the pneumatic captive bolt device. I observed the 

market beefimmediately lowered its head and I could 

observe its ears moving, I observed the beefthenraise its 

head using controlled movements to move its head from 

side to side, with blood coming out of its nose. I observed 

the beefthen l'owered its head down again into the 

restrainer by the belly belt. The second stun operator was 

able to apply a second stun attempt with a handheld captive 

bolt device once 1he animal settled, which rendered the 

market beefinsensible. I took the regulatory control action 

of stopping production until I was able to'inform 

establishment manaoement what I had observed. I verbally 

notified (b) (6) that an NR was 

forthcoming. The Denver District Management Team was 

notified through supervisory channels. There have been no 

Humane Handling NR's or MOl's documented for stunning 

effectiveness within 1he past 90 days. 

CLOSED 

M4653A+P46 

53A+v4653A 

Agri Star Meat 

and Poultry, LLC 

{3FE68ABC-325B 

-4D43-B6E2-47E 

4E879BE14} 

HRJ031'5 

024908N 

-1 

02/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane.Handlin9 

313.2 HATS Category 11- Water and Feed Availability At 

approximately 0640 I observed the followfng 

noncompliance. The automatic waterer between pens 7 

and 8 oftbe new bam was completely dry and the one 

between pens 1 and 2 had less than a halfinch ofwater in 

il rendering itunusableby the cattle ln these pens. There 

are no other sources of drinking water avallable Tn these 

pens. At thattime there Were 38, 36, 36. and 35 cattleheld 

in pens 1, 2, 7,and 8. respectiv.ely. I notified!Ill mi 

of the noncompliance. 

Maintenance was immediately notified and determined·that 

the pfpes to the automatic waterers had frozen. Tliey 

thawed the pipes, refilled the waterers, and planned to 

replace the plug in the bottom of the waterers With ones 

thatwould allow constantdraining, preventing the pipes 

from refreezlng by ensuring lhe water was running 

continuously. 

CtOSED 

M5537 Sioux-Preme 

Packing Co. 

{1203951 B-49CC 

-4CCA-8623-675 

3F1E1AE93} 

TJF5113 

031910N 

-2 

03/10/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 At approximately 12:45, while performinq HATS Category 

IV-antemortem inspection With (b) (6) , I noticed 

12 pigs penned up at the north end of the soulh aUeyway. 

Upon further examination ofU,e pen, I noticed one waterer. 

After check ing to see ifwater would flow from the nipple, I 

found that it had been shutoffat the valve. Since the pigs 

were penned up with no water, I determined that the 

establishment was not in compliance with regulation 9 CFR 

313.2(e) which reads: Animals shall have access to water 

in all holdinQ pens. I notified (b) (6) , ofthe forthcoming 

noncompliance record. The watervalve was turned back 

on so the pigs woutd have access to water. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 31 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M5622+PS62 

2+V5622 

Albion Locker {1354DDB7-DBE 

9--46BB-AF22-5D 

8F098882F1}. 

XDH5'111 

035104N 

-1 

03/04/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313. 16(a)(1), 

313.16(b)(1) 

(iii) 

HATS Category: VIII Stunning EffectivenessOn March 4. 

2021 al 11 :30, while performing a humane handling 

procedure, I observed a trainee sl·aughterpersonnel fire a 

shotat a market hog in the knocking pen. During the 

course ofthis event due to the smaller size of the animal in 

a larger chute, the trainee took his. time and carefully 

aimed the 22 rifle for a shoL I noticed the animal did not 

go down, nor did itrespond in any manner. The animal 

took two steps forward with its head down then looked at 

the trainee. A senior employee took the 22 rifle and 

immediate'ly took a second shot, atwhich point the hog 

dropped in place without further movement. I inspected the 

animal and verified that it did not have rhythmic breathing 

and was rendered insensible with the second stun. I 

verbally notified the plant owner, Dustin Frey, ofthe 

non,compliance with the ineffective stunni·ng of the animal. 

I inspected the head and discovered' that the penetrating 

stun hole was outside the of the acceptable target zone for 

firearm stunning. The other penetrating stun hole was 

closer to the appropriate location but still outside the target 

zone. The (b) (6) , was 

contacted. There have been no other non-compliances for 

the same root causewithin the last 90 day.s. 

OPEN 

MS622+PS62 

2+V5622 

Albion Locker {A88A8E94-3F03 

-4FB3-B42F-889 

79F965E71} 

XDH0910 

031708N 

-1 

03/08/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.16(a)(1), 

313.16(b)(1) 

Oii) 

On March 8, 2021 at 9:38am1 while performing a humane 

handling stunnlhg effectiveness .task, l observed a 

slaughter employee utilize a mag rifle to stun a beefin the 

stunning box. The stunning attempt did notimmedfately 

renderthe animal unconscious. The beef did not voclalize 

butdid get a bloody nose. The employee lined up for a 

second shot. at which point the beefdropped in place 

without further movement I inspected the animal and 

verified that lt had' no rhythmic breathing and' had been 

rendered insensible with the second shot Then. I 

inspected the head and discovered that one of penetrating 

stun was below the acceptable target zone for firearm 

stunning. Another penetrating stun was slightly above the 

target zone. I infom1ed (b) {6) ofthe 

non--compliance due to ineffective stunning ofan animal. 

The lb) (6) was contacted. 

There was a non-compliance documented for the same 

root cause on 3/4/21 . 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 32 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M20748+V20 Sig International, {99DDFS86-D971 ZSK0508 02/10/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1), At approximately 0935 hours, while observino HATS CLOSED 

748 Iowa, Inc. -4A99-9O57-EFE 024011N Humane Handling 313.15(b)(1) Cateoory VIII - (b) (6) 

30E7DA45C} -1 (iii) , observed the following noncompliance: A disabled 

market hog was brought to the sticking area in a sled by an 

establishment employee and released from the sled. 

Another establishment employee attempted to stun the hog 

with a hand,held captive boll (HHCB) device. The device 

was heard to engage, and the hog rolled to,its side butthen 

immediately righted itself,into sternal recumbency, 

controlling its head movement as itlooked around. The hog 

was conscious. The establishment employee sticking, and 

bleeding hogs reached down to stick the hog, butan 

establishment employee stopped him. This establishment 

employee reloaded the HHCBdevice and the hog. was 

immediately and effectively stunned resulting in an 

unconscious hog. Ms. Wendy Soule, Establishment 

Manager, was in the area and was notified of the 

ineffective stun noncompliance. I notified Ms. Soule of the 

forthcoming noncompliance record for failure to meet 

regulations 9 CFR 313.15(a)(1) and 313.15(b)(iii). She 

provided verbal preventative measures. The skinned head 

was reviewed, and two separate distinct wounds were 

located approximately one inch above the cross section 

between the eyes.The (b) (6) , observed the split head. One 

wound bolt entry was anteriorto the brain cavity entering 

the na.sal sinus. Another w.ound bolt entry entered the 

anterior portion ofthe brain cavity on the very edge. ofthe 

brain. 

M2934 Star Packing Co., {1CCSF4BC-6F4 LCA4710 03/01/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 At or about 0958 while conducting a humane handling task CLOSED 

Inc. F-4A1 D-A649-7F 030401N HumaneHandling t. (b) (6) , didobservesixvealcalves 

EE0FA880E4} -1 standing and walking throughout and around a holding pen 

which also had hazards such as a pile of two by four 

boards with nails protruding through them thus exposed to 

the livestock. Also, Tn this pen were over a dozen two by 

four boards loosely leaning and lying throughout this pen in 

a hazardous disarray presenting danger for footing and 

other inj ury. I fmmediately notified ownerKadhem 

Alyasserl that this is noncompliance Under 9CFR 313.1 (a). 

Owner Kadhem A. Tmrnediately moved all the livestock into 

an adjoining pen and locked it so they may not reenter. For 

this reason a US Retain/Reject tag was not applied. After 

reviewing the past ninety days of NR's I concludethere is 

nota repeating root cause to this lssue. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 33 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M2936+P293 Valley Oaks {E53F39E4-0B48 XOB1414 02/05/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1), HATS Category VIII -Stunninq Effectiveness On 2/5/21 , at OPEN 

6+V2936 Meats, LLC -41DC,8759-F2D 025405N Humane Handling 313.15/a)(3) approximately 0940 hours, I, (b} ( 6) , verbally 

9B6ABFF02} -1 notified Jake Huddleston, Plant Manager. of my decision to 

take regulatory control action to preventthe slaughter of 

animals, I advised Mr. Huddleston that I had contacted the 

District Office about enforcement actions due to an 

egregious humane handling noncompliance and thatthe 

District Office would befollowing up with a written 

suspension or NOIE letter to the establishment I based my 

decision to take a regulatory control action on the 

following: At approximately 0925 hours. while perfonning 

HATS Category VJII - Stunning Effectiveness, I heard an 

establishment employee, that had' entered the knock box to 

stun a hog, fire a handheld captfve bolt stunning device. 

From my vantage point, I could see thatthe animal was still 

standing, and I observed blood coming from the animal's 

snout. The employee applieda second stun with the 

captive bolt to the ariimal and again, theanimal remained 

standing, and I could see that itwas fully alertand I 

observed more blood coming from the animal's snout and 

from behind its ear. The employee stated to another 

establishment employee that he had applied two stuns lo 

the animal and that it was still conscious, and he needed 

help. The second employee retrieved a pistol (.40 caliber) 

and gave it to the employee perfonning the stunning, which 

he used to apply a third stun, which rendered the animal 

immediately unconscious. Atthis time, after contacting the 

SPHV and the DVMS for guidance, I placed U.S. Rejected 

tag #B22311474 to the knock.box as regulatory control (the 

hog in question was the last animal being slaughtered on 

this date). It should be noted' that afteralt hair had been 

removed from the animal's head, .1 observed two entry 

holes behind one ear and one entry hole ln the forehead. 

This noncompliance represents a failure to meet the 

regulatory requirements of9 CFR 313.15(a)(t) and 

313"15(a)(3). The establishment does not currently have a 

Robust Systematic: Approach to Humane Handling Plan. A 

review ofNR history .at!his establfshmenl revealed no 

recent noncompliance records with a similar cause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 34 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M2936+P293 Valley Oaks {SE40SS2E-BS0F XOBS510 02/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1), HATS Category VIII -StunninQ Effectiveness On 2/9/21, at CLOSED 

6+V2936 Meats, LLC -41DC,9D9HFE 022110N Humane Handling 37 3.15/a)(3) approximately 0805 hours, I, (b} (6) , was on the 

B1844FA3B} -1 slaughter fioor verifying HATS Category V111'5tunning 

Effectiveness, when I observed the following 

noncompliance: I heard an establishment employee, that 

hadentered the knock box to stun a hog, fire a handheld 

captive bolt stunning device, then heard the animal vocalize 

loudly. I also observed that tl1e animal was still standing. 

The employee immediately applied a second stun which 

rendered the anrmal unconscious. It should be noted that 

after all hair had been removed from the animal's head, I 

observed two entry holes along the center Line ofthe 

forehead, approximately one inch apart. This 

noncompliance represents a failureto meet the regulatory 

requirements of 9 CFR 313.1S(a)(.1) and 313.15(a)(3) and 

I informed Plant ManagerJake Huddleston thata 

noncompliance record would be issued. The establishment 

does notcurrently have a Robust Systematic Approach to 

Humane Handling Plan. This noncompliance is being 

associated to another NR (XOB141402540SN/1), dated 

2/5/21 for the similarcause offailure to produce lmmediate 

unconsciousness when stun in9 an animal. The 

preventative measures ofemployee training proved to be 

ineffective in this instance. 

M2969+P296 Swiss Processing {1FA96F29-9068- DEG230 02J0V2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1), On Monday February 1, 2021 at or about 0815 hours " QLOSED 

9+V2969 Pla[lt Inc. 460F-A30E-ECB 9022001 HumaneHandling 373.1S(a)(3) notlfiedrrie (b) (6) ) the establishment 

206FE0763} N-1 failed to successfully stun a lamb 011 the first attempt as per 

HATS Category VIII- Stunning Effectiveness. The captive 

boltfalled to render the lamb unco11scious due to the 

placement. (b) (6) did not observe the animal afterthe 

initial stun attempt but he did obseNe the employee 

immediately apply the second stun using the alternate 

device which was successful in renderin_g the lamb 

unconseious. After investigation into the fncident, the 

establishment employeeskinned the head and determined 

the captive bolt round entered at an angle on the upper 

right side of the skull and exited the side ofthe skull. The 

employee indicated the lamb's head moved as the shot was 

being delivered. The establishment has fa/fed to comply 

With 9 CFR 313.15(a)(1) and 9 CFR313.15(a)(3). QA 

Manager was notified at 0840 hours of this noncompliance. 
,

6 

Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 35 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Descript ion Status 

MSS36+P553 Banner Creek, {2B007097-5095 DCl4409 02/15/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 A. Category I - Inclement Weather (9 CFR 313. 1 CLOSED 

LLC -42B6-A7F4-,2FB 020217N Humane Handling Livestock are slipping and falling due to icy floor conditions 

221 F99CE1} -1 (9 CFR 313.1 (b) On February 15, 2021 , I, SPHV 

Prillaman, rejected Pen 9A fat use for livestock. At0530 

hrs. during ante mortem inspection. Pen 9A held 

approximately 90 sows for slaughter. I observed a pipe 

leaking waterin Pen 9A. The pen floor had a circular 

area of ice, appreximately 5 feel in diameter, about 8 feet 

from thefrontof the pen. I observed several sows walk 

across the ice, slipping excessively and splitting out on 

hind limbs. I rejected the pen forfurther use. 

Establishment personnel moved the sows out ofPen 9A 

and into the alley where the footinQ was adequate for 

livestock. I Informed (b) (6) 

ofthe noncompliance. 

M5777A University of {64A89FEO-.B502 VD0 291 02/24/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category VIII- Stunnfng EffectlvenessOn February CLOSED 

Missouri Meat -427D-854A-BD1 3023824 Humane Handling 24. 2021 at approximately 0915 hours. the followinq 

Markel 73679C9DC} N-1 noncompllance was observed by (b) (6) :A plant 

employee attempted to stun a beef utilizing a handheld 

captive bolt device and failed to render ft unconsdous. The 

animal vocalized. took a step back, continued to stand and 

remained fully alert after the first stunning attempt. The 

employee immediately applied a second stun using the 

captive bolt device and successfully rendered the beef 

unconscious. The establishment manager was informed 

thata noncompliance. would be issued. The establishment 

failed to comply with 9 CFR 313.1S(a)(1). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 36 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Descript ion Status 

M10624 Arkansas fF1020D6E-E877 EAA2711 02/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 On the date of02/09/2021 at the approximate.time of0?:30 CLOSED 

Department of -4467-9879--?CC 024009N Humane Handling a.m. while I, (b) (6) , was in the process of 

Corrections 28FBA87C7} -1 performing the verification ofa Humane Handling task 

which included HATS Category IV- Handling During Ante 

Mortem Inspection and HATS Category VII - Observations 

for slips and falls. the following non compliance was 

observed: I observed 8 beef cows standing in sewage 

water (plant agri. manager Mr. Homer did confirm this was 

sewage water) that was approximately 8 inches deep. The 

above cited regulation states: Pens, floors, and-driveways., 

including entrance and exits, are to be ma.inlained in good 

repair. The observation of sewage water in'the holding 

pens do not represent the pens in good repair or represent 

the pens in a sanltary condition. Establishments are to 

provide adequate footing in their livestock facili1ies. Water 

or sewage, which would measure approximately 8 inches 

deep does not provide adequate fooling for livestock. 

Sewage disposal should be properly conveyed and not end 

up flooding livestock holding pens. Regulation 9 CFR 

416.2(e)(2) Plumbing. Plumbing systems must be 

installed and maintained to: Properly c-onvey sewage and 

liquid disposable waste from the establishment.Mr. Scott 

Homer-agri. plant manager was verbally informed ofthe 

failure to meet the above cited regulations. The above 

stated observations represent a failure to properly 

implement the procedures listed in your SOP Humane 

Slaughter plan.The following regulatory control action was 

implemented by USDA personnel: The animal holding 

pens were rejected by applying U.S. REJECTED tag NG. 

B 22621966 to the entrance of the holding pen entrance 

gate. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 37 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M86E Cargill Meat 

Solutions 

Corporatron 

fBA4465B5-97AE 

-4631-A8D3-875 

92C65AEE9} 

UHM451 

1031927 

N-1 

03/27/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

3U15(a)(1) I tv'(b) (6) observed the following 

non-compliance under verification of HATS Category VlJl 

on3-27-21 at establishment 86E, Cargill MeatSolutions in 

Friona, TX. Al approximately 0840 hours while verifyrng 

sanitary dressing procedures on the skinning line I heard 

bawling in the knocking area. When I arrived in that area, I 

observed a conscious steer on the incline bell below the 

OPEN 

knocking box. The steers left rear leg was between the 

incline belt and the bottom incline beltshield. The steers 

righrfront teg had an open transverse fracture mid 

metacarpal. The incline beltwas runnITTg, and the knocker 

was continuing to knock cattle thus preventing the 

secondary knockerfrom approaching the steer and 

rendering it unconscious. I motioned for the knocker to 

cease knocking and the secondary knocker was able to 

stun the steer with a single blow. I tobk regulatory control 

and rejected the knocking box with US Retain/Reject Tag 

NO. B36250686 atapproximately 0845 hours. I allowed the 

est:ablishment to process the animals that had already been 

knocked. The establishment has a current written Robust 

Systematic Approach to Humane Handling. After the 

establishment management presented corrective actions Lo 

prevent a reoccurrence ofthe event in the future, I 

relinquished regulatory control ofthe knocking box al0955 

hours. The establishment has failed to comply with 9CFR 

313.lS(a). 

M7050+P705 

0 

Ryan's Custom 

Meats 

{C062EE91-AFF 

4-4AB7-96FF-0C 

DBDEB227F6} 

SVK1715' 

034222N 

-1 

03/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandlin_g 

313.2 On 03/22/2021 HATS Category Ill: Water and Feed 

Availability3CFR 313.(2)While performing Anti-Mortem 

Inspection: Hats Category IIIThree Sheep ready for 

Anti-Mortem Inspection were befng held in the Suspect 

Pen. were wfthout access to waterPlant Management Linda 

Swain was nofified and was lnformed that a 

OPEN 

non-compliance would beTssuedManagementimmediately 

went and filled up the water This is a violation of 9 CFR 

313.2(e) Which states in part "Animals shall have access 

Lo water rn hold1ngpens" 

M13276+P13 

276+V13276 

Edes Custom 

Meats 

{A56D21AF-D19 

D-434E-BAD0,70 

DA424D67A7} 

AJA3413 

020311N 

-1 

02/11/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 On 2, 11-21 while perfonning Antemortem rnspec!ion on the 

cattle that had been left overnight atEst 13276 Edes 

Custom Meats, the following noncompliance was observed 

in Pen 3 ofthe. Livestock holding pens. There were 3 cattle 

in Pen 3 which is clearly posted itis for holding two cattle 

only. I do not know how long lhe cattfe had been at the 

establishment's holding pen. The cattle in Pen 3 were 

cramped and there was notany room for the cattle to lay 

down. I also observed that the cattle did not have access Lo 

CLOSED 

any water as all the water trofts were frozen solid. Es!. 

13276is not in compliance With 9CFR. 313.2(e). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 38 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M13445+P13 Huse's {4BE1687C-F286 ABl4709 01/07/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1), Atapproximately 0725 hourson 01/07/2020, while OPEN 

445+V13445 Processing Inc. -473C-,991 B,8E6 013107N Humane Handling 37 3.15/a)(3) performing the stunning effectiveness and consciousness 

29C49052A} -1 on the rail categories of the livestock humane animal 

handling task, I observed one ofthe sheep in the sticking 

area open and close its mouth, blink, and attempt to sit 

uprightfrom laying on its right side. The plant employee 

who was working in the sticking area made no attemptto 

inform the foreman thatthe sheep was regaining 

consciousness, so I informed 'the foreman thatthe animal 

was regaining consciousness. The foreman got the 

captive bolt gun and stunned the animal again, effectively 

rendering it unconscious and insensible to pain. FSIS 

Directive 6900.2 Revision 3, dated 09/24/20, Chapter 1, 

Section V.B. states, "Egregious inhumane treatment An 

egregious situation is an aci orcondition that results jn 

severe harm to animals, for example; ... 5. Stunni"ng of 

animals and then allowing them to regain consciousness". 

Since the sheep was stunned then regained 

consciousness, this was an egregious humane handling 

violation. The employee who was stunning the animals was 

notthe employee who usually. performs the stunning 

procedure, as the foreman almostalways does il I had 

not seen that employee perform the stunning procedure. 

which meets the definition set forth in subsection 7, part d 

of the above stated chapter in Directive 6900.2 Revision 3. 

Subsection 7, part d, states, "Multiple ineffective stun 

attempts (2 or more) that are due to one or more ofthe 

following establishment failures to properly handle or stun 

the animal: d. Poorly trained/untrained operator or 

inexperienced operator." The sheep regaining 

consciousness after being stunned is a noncompliance 

with 9 CFR 313. 15(a1(1) and 313.15(a)(3) . I informed 

(b)' (6) of the e.c:1reqious humane animal handling 

noncompliance ( b} ( 6) 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 39 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M19478 ABF Packing, {60C658CB-9800 AMH330 02/12/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15 On 1 February 12, 2021 , at approximately 0630 hours,•.: 11 • CLOSED 

Inc. -4529-BCBE-F36 8020012 Humane Handling (b)(1 )(i), , was performing the humane 

66EE06EC8} N-1 313.15(al(1), 

313.1S(a)(3), 

313.15(b)(1) 

(iii) 

handlinqverification task atestablishment M 19478. •••' · 

was verifying compliance ofthe HATS cateqory 

IV. handling during ante mortem inspection. (b) (6) 

observed two yard employees moving an unrestrained 

dairy cow into the triangle restrainer pen that was 

inspected and passed ante-mortem jnspection. The dairy 

cowwas conscious, standing up right with rhythmic 

breathing and tracking eye movements. The daii:y ,cow was 

bleedinq from the back of her head behind the poll. Mr. 

(b) (6) • stated that she was 

knocked in the back ofher head with a captive bolt gun 

and it was not effective. He proceeded to go getthe shot 

gun from the gun safe in the Yard shack. After several 

minutes had passed.(b) (6) returned with the 410 shot 

gun and applied another stun attempt The dairy cow was 

rendered immediately unconscious. by the stun attempt and 

immediately dropped to the ground, displayed no tracking 

eye movements, rhythmic breathinq or riqhtinQ reflex.'"' ' 

immediately notified ( b) ( 6) , of 

the situation 'that had transpired. After correlation with'"' '' 

,(b) (6) notified (b) (6) that a 

noncompliance record would be issued to documentthe 

inhuman handling. (b) (6) observed the skinned 

head ofthe dairy cow '/00. There were 2 knock holes. 

present and adjacent to each behind the poll of the dairy 

cow. Additionally, there was a 2 inch hole on the front of 

the forehead. This represents a failure to comply with 9 

CFR 313.1S(a)(1), 9 CFR 313.15{a)(3), 313.15(b)(1)(i), 

313.1S(b)(1)(iii), and 313.1S(b)(1)(iv'}. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 40 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M7455+P745 Williams Sausage {76897179-F034. UQD160 02/15/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1, 313.2 HATS CATEGORY I, 111, and lVWhileperforming the CLOSED 

5+V7455 Co., Inc. 4A74-9994-,FA31 8025715 Humane Handling Livestock Humane Handling Task at Williams Sausage 

400574A7) N-1 M7455, On 2/15/21 at approximately 5:45 a.m., (b) (6) 

obseNed the following noncompliance while 

performing antemortem inspection:ln the establishment hog 

pens, the mist sprayers were actively spraying overthe 

hogs in pen 6 on arrival and had been spraying for some 

time based on the amount of ice buildup both in the pen 

and on the hogs. The temperature in the area overthe 

weekend had been below freezing the entire time, and 

there were 2 deceased hogs in the pen with 98 totaJ hogs. 

All hogs had ice on their hides, and therewas -1/2'' thick 

ice covering the floor of the pen. The available water trough 

in the pen was also frozen. Additionally, all walkways in the 

holding area were covered with a 1 /4"-1 /2" thick coating of 

ice, and there were no available pens to which the hogs 

could be moved safely due to a. thick. diffuse coating ofice 

in the 2 open pens. Lastly, there was a 10' x 6' x 2' pile of 

shoveled ice along the side wall of Pen 1 preventing safe 

unloading ofadditional animals (b) (6) immediately 

notified (b) (6) , of the 

noncompliance with 9 CFR 3 13.1(b), 9 CFR 313.2(a), and 

9 CFR 313.2(e), and applied US RejectTag #B37786371 

to the establishment holding pens. The establishment began 

performing their corrective actions of clearing the ice and 

making the pens suitable to hold animals safely. 

M9065+P906 Wamplers Farm {8EA26042-DB66 GHB0413 01/05/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS category IV (Handling during Antemortem C•LOSED 

S+V9065 Sausage -4DD6-8E64-921 013805N HumaneHandlin_g lnspection)-At approximately 1100 hours while monitoring 

15AFF60BD} -1 stunntng effectiveness I observed the followin_g: The 

employeeperforming the stunning stopped the V-belt 

restralner with a hog halfway through the belt. He then 

reversed the motion of the V-belt restrainer to run 

backwards. Only the belt on the left side ofthe hog ran 

backwards, Thebelt on lhe right side-of the hog did not 

run backwards but stayed stationary. This placed torque 

on the hog with theleft belt running backwards but the right 

belt remaining stationary. I waved my hands and told the 

employee to stop the belt as this was causing undue 

excitement and stress on the hog wfth potential to cause 

injury and unnecessary pain. I placed U.S. Rejecttag 

B-45235679 on the control panel for the V-belt restrainer 

and notitied (b) {6) a11d 

(b) (6) ofthe. noncompliance 

with 313.2(a). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 41 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M9085+V908 

5 

Snapps Ferry 

Packing 

Company 

{B0BCDE67-557 

0-4322-A830-76 

D7407448A1} 

QSF1411 

021024N 

-2 

02/24/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1, 313.2 HATS Category Ill-Waterand Feed Availability. At 

approximately 11:00 am on 2/24/2021.1. (b) (6) 

observed the [allowing non-compliances in the plant's 

livestock pens while perfonning ante-mortem inspection. 

Pens #2 and #3 contained cattle, but no water receptacles 

or waterfor the livestock was observed. This is a violation 

CLOSED 

of 9 CFR 313.2(e).HATS Category VII-Slips and Falls. In 

the chute which leads to the knock box, there were several 

metal poles laying on the ground which livestock would 

have to step over and around to be led into the knocking 

pen. This is a violation of 9 CFR 313.1(a) and (b).I 

immediately tagged the pens with USDAReject Tag 

#817582784. Establishment owners Jason Southerland 

and Jeremy Southerland were notified of the 

non-compliances. Mr. Jason Southerland's immediate 

corrective actions were to remove the poles from the chute 

area and place tubs in the pens andiill them with water. 

M9085+V908 

5 

Snapps Ferry 

Packing 

Company 

{AA79C9AD-17D 

C-47ED-BF95-B 

C2AA8760595} 

QSF5407 

034001N 

-1 

03/01/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS CategotY Ill-Water and Feed Availabllity. On 

3/01 /21, at approxlmately 0805 hours while performTng 

antecmortem inspection at Snapps Ferry Packing Co. In 

Afton.TN, J. (b) (6) ,observed sixhogs in Pen #3 did 

nothave access to waler. The watertrough in the pen was 

observed to be.empty. Jeremy Southerland, owner. was 

notified ofthe noncomplfance with 9 CFR 

313.2(e).lmrnediate cotrective actions were taken by the 

establishment to provide water.This noncompliance record 

ts being linked to QSF1411021024N/2 dated 2/24/2021. 

ClOSED 

M9085+V908 

5 

Snapps Ferry 

Packing 

Company 

{414C82BF--0DD 

44ECF--9F24-18 

BB355EAD64} 

QSF0508 

0301 15N 

-1 

03/15/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category Ill .. Wate1' and Feed Avallabilrty. On 

3/15/21, at approximately 0833 hours while performing 

ante.mortem inspection atSnapps Ferry Packinq Co. in 

Afton, TN, I, (b) (6) • and (b) (6} 

observed two hogs in the pens that did not hav.e 

access to water. The water trough in the pen was observed 

to be empty .Jason Southerland, Owner. was notified ofthe 

noncompliance with 9 CFR 313.2(e).lmrnediate corrective 

adions were taken by the establishment to provide 

water.This noncompliance record is being linked to 

QSF5407034001N/1 dated 3/1/2021 . 

CLOSED 

M9085'!-V908 

5 

Snapps Ferry 

Packing 

Company 

{4E4C533B--847F 

--4EA5--9874-51A 

4633C7248} 

QSF41 10 

033725N 

-1 

03/25/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category 111- Water and Feed Availability. On 

3/25/21, at approximately 1015 hours while performing 

ante-mortem inspection at Snapps Ferry Packing Co. in 

Afton. TN, l,(b) (6) observed seven hogs in pen 

# 2 that did not have access to water. The water trough in 

the pen was observed to be empty.Jason Southerfand. 

CLOSED 

Owner, was notified of the noncompliance wrth 9 CFR 

313.2(e).lmrnediate corrective actions weretaken by the 

establishmentto provide water.This noncompliancerecord 

is being linked to QSF050803011.SN/1 dated 3/15/2021 

I and QSF5407034001 N/1 dated 3/1/2021. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 42 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Descript ion Status 

M17301+P17 

301 

Yoder Brothers 

Meat Processing 

{59898D87-9161-

448F-AEE0-6FB4 

4FB32528} 

YPK3410 

030522N 

-1 

03/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

3H1S(a)(1), 

37 3.15/a)(3) 

HATS Category VHI - Stunning Effectiveness - On March 

22, 2021, at approximately 0850 hours, I, (b) (6) 

was performing a routine verification task for during 

Humane Handling. The following noncompliance was 

observed:An establishment employee moved a hog •into the 

stunning box. A designated employee attempted to stun the 

animal using a captive boll device. After administering the 

firstshot, the animal went down. •released a long breath, 

and•immediately stood up. The designated employee 

reloaded the captive bolt device and administered a second 

shot that was ineffective, exhibited by the animal 

remaining standing. The captive bolt device was reloaded 

for a third time and a third shot was administered that did 

notrender the animal unconscious and insensible to pain, 

as the animal sltU remained standing. At that point, the 

establishment summoned an additional employee from 

processing who is specifically authorized lo administer a 

gun shol Thal employee immediately retrieved the firearm 

from its Jocation, came to the sfaughler ·Hoar, and 

dispensed a single shot which rendered the animal 

unconscious and insensible, The stunninq box was tagged, 

and(b ) (6) was notified 

of the noncompliance. 

CLOSED 

M86R Cargfll Meat 

Solutions 

{70F7C97F-D69F 

-4808-A2E7-FB4 

37512FACC} 

EHN2618 

01 1221N 

-1 

01/21/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category VIII: Stunning Effectiveness At 

approximately 5:58pm on Friday, February 26. 2021 whlle 

observ]ng stunnlng, effectiveness during a routine humane 

handlfng task. I, (b) (6) observed the 

following noncompllance. The plant employee was using 

the pneumatic captive. bolt as theprimary stunning de.vice. 

I observed the employee apply the first stun attempt on a 

beef heifer or steer wlth thepneumatic captive bolt applied 

directly to the head of the animal. Following the first stun 

attempt, the bovine remained with its head uptight and 

conscious with the head moving about, eyes tracking and 

blinking. and rhythmic breathing. The employee 

Immediately stopped the conveyer and carefully realigned 

the captive bolt and applied the second stun attempt. which 

was effective at rendering the animal unconscious. The 

time in between stunning~attempts was approximately 4 

seconds. No additional stunning attempts were made. Tile 

animal remained unconscious during shackling. sticking. 

and bleeding. Thisls not in compliance wtth regulation 

313.15(a)(1): Immediate unconsc1ousness after a captive 

bolt stun. (b) ~6) 

and (b (6) were notified 

of the noncomplianceas was (b) (6) . (b) (6~ . Denver District management was contacted 

throug supervisory channels.Thls noncompliance is 

associated wllh NR# EHN2618011221 N / 1 issued on 

1/22/2021 for the same root cause. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 43 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M86R Cargill Meat 

Solutions 

{EB907FD0-5O 

9-4247-8430--028 

313FD8B8C} 

EHN4200 

021427N 

-1 

02/26/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category Vlll: Stunning Effectiveness At 

approximately 5:58pm on Friday; February 26. 2021 while 

observing stunnino effectiveness durino a routine humane 

handling task, I, (b) (6) observed the 

following noncompliance. The plant empl.oyee was using 

the pneumatic captive bolt as the primary stunning device. 

I observed the employee apply the first stun attempt on a 

beef heifer or steer with the pneumatic captive bolt applied 

OPEN 

directly to the head ofthe animal. Following the first stun 

attempt, the bovine remained standing and conscious with 

the head moving about, eyes tracking and blinking, and 

rhythmk breathing. The employee immediately stopped the 

conveyer and carefully realigned the captive bolt and 

applied the second stun attempt, which was effective at 

rendering the animal unconscious. The time in between 

stunning attempts was approximately 8 seconds. No 

additional stunning attempts were made. The animal 

remained unconscious during shackling, sticking, and 

bleeding. This is not in compliance with regulation 

313.1S(a)(1): Immediate unconsciousness after a captive 

boltstun. (b( tl 

and b 6) were notified 

ofthe noncompliance as was (b) (6) . Denver District management was contacted 

through supervisory channels.This noncompliance is 

associated with NR# EHN2618011221 N issued on 

2/21/2021 for same root cause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 44 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M86R Cargill Meat {2A2MBA9-SA8 EHN1718 03/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 *Note this noncompliance was originally issued as part of CLOSED 

Solutions S..4749-MF2-4C 033820N Humane Handling noncompliance #EHN2418030203N. It has been 

A0F896AD79} -1 separated out atthe request of district office and is no 

longer part ofthat noncompliance*Oniuesday, March 2, 

2021 . 1,(b) (6) While perfonning a 

routine humane handling task observed the following 

noncompliance. HATS Category Ill: Water and Feed 

Availability At approximately 6:15pm on Tuesday. March 2 , 

2021 while observing the pens for water and-feed 

availability during .antemortem examination, Pen 20 was 

observed to be overcrowded and unable to move past each 

other to access water. The cattle were unable to move past 

each other or tum around even when the pen (b) (6) 

attempted to move them forward to allow 

several cattle laying at the A side gate (outer ally) that had 

other cattle standing over them to stand up. A large number 

ofcattle within the pen were forced to resttheir heads on 

the backs of othercattle. The cattleon theground were 

starting to get stepped on when he attempted to shift-them 

forward. causing pen (b) ( 6) to 

immediately open the gate and guide the outer standing 

cattle around those lyingdown to an areaof the ally behind 

the gate. After getting the cattle standing, he extended out 

the pen, opening an area ofthe ally to the cattle to allow 

more freedom of movementUpon further investigatiol'\, it 

was discovered that" 1 '''head were ln the pen, with a posted 

limit ot·•"'"head perthe plan ofthe establishmenL The 

posted limits were confirmed as up to date with the 

establishmentlastweek by(b) (6) . The check in 

time for the pen card was labeled 3:09pm. No regulatory 

control action was taken due to observation ofcorrective 

actions. This is not in compliance w ith reg,ulation 313.2(e). 

(b) (6) was verbally notified 

of the noncompliance as was (b) ( 6) . Denver district management was contacted 

through supervisory channels. There have been no 

noncompliance records forthe same root cause issued 

within-the past 90 days. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 45 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M86R Cargill Meat 

Solutions 

fBA0550B7-D3B 

A-4ESD,80FA-E8 

4B0FA2E939} 

EHN2418 

030203N 

-1 

03/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) On Tuesday, March 2, 2021, i.(b) (6) 

while performing a routine humane handling task observed 

the following noncompliance. HATS Category VIII: 

Stunning Effectiveness Atapproximately 9:22pm on 

Tuesday, March 2, 2021 while observing stunning 

effectiveness, I observed the following noncompliance. 

The plant employee was using the pneumatic captive bolt 

as the primary stunning device. I observed the employee 

apply thefirst stun attempt on a beef heifer or steer. The 

animal moved its head and the stunning attempt hit the skull 

forward ofthe right ear. Following the first s!un attempt the 

animal remained with its head upright and conscious with 

rhythmic breathing and eyes tracking. The employee 

immediately stopped the conveyer and carefully realigned 

the pneumatic captive bolt and applied the second stun 

atlemp.t, which was effective at rendering the animal 

unconscious. A third "safety'' stun was applled as per plant 

protocol. The animal remained unconscious during 

shackling, sticking, and bleeding. The duration between 

first and second stun was ·approximately 2 seconds. This is 

not in compliance with regulation 313.1 S(a)(1 ): Immediate 

unconsciousness by captive bolt This was initially judged 

to notbe an egregious noncompliance due immediate and 

effective corrective actions to render the animal 

unconscious, therefore no requlatorv control actions were 

taken. (b) (6) was verbally notified of the noncompliance as was 

(b) (6) Denver Distrfct 

management was contacted through supervisory channels. 

This noncompliance is associated with 

NR# EHN4200021427N 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 46 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M86R Cargill Meat 

Solutions 

{OC4E45CO-C3D 

9-45CC.8F1A.S9 

18E4D06115} 

EHN5921 

030208N 

-1 

03/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(1) Humane Handling Routine Task: HATS Category VIII: 

Stunning Effectiveness Atapproximately 6:29pm on 

Monday, March 8, 2021 while observinq stunning 

effectiveness, I. (b) ( 6) , observed the 

following noncompliance. The plant employee was using 

the pneumatic captive bolt as the primary stunning device. 

I observed the employee apply the first stun attempt on a 

beef heifer or steer. Following the firststun attempt, the 

animal remained with itshead upright and conscious, 

vocalized, and attempted to climb with its forelegs overthe 

back of the animal forward ofit. The employee immediately 

stopped lhe conveyer and carefully realigned the 

pneumatic captive bolland applied the second stun 

attempt, which was effective al rendering the animal 

unconscious. The animal remained unconscious during 

shackling, sticking, and bleeding. The duration between 

firstand second stun was approximately 3 seconds. This is 

notin compliance with regulation 313.1 S(a)( 1 ): Immediate 

unconsciousness by captive bolt. This was initially judged 

to not be an egregious noncompliance due immediate and 

effective corrective actions to render the animal 

unconscious, therefore no requlatory control actions were 

taken. (b) (6i 

and ( ) (6) as well as(b) (6) 

were verbally notifi.ed ofthe 

noncompliance as was{ b) (6} 

Denver District management was contacted through 

supervisory channels. This noncompliance is associated 

with NR#EHN2418030203N from 3/2/21. 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 47 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M874+P1923 Utah State {38717FDB-A600 SHJ4415 01/19/20:21 04C02 Livestock 313.30(a)(3) While preforming the Livestock Humane handling task CLOSED 

7+V874 University Meal -4D40-AF99-49F 013619N Humane Handling under the "HATS" category "Stunning effectiveness'' at 

Science lab 709F2B001} -1 Establishment M874 Utah State University MeatScience 

lab. I (b) (6) 

along with (b) (6) 

noticed the following Humane Handlinq noncompliance. At 

approximately 11:15am(b) (6) administered 

the electric shock to the sow behind the ears on the back 

of the head. The sow dropped to its side and then the wand 

was placed on the sow's chest behind the front leg to 

contact the heartin the knock box, As the electrlc wand 

was taken off the sow fell forward onto her head and neck 

without any vocalization or movement was not observed, 

butwhen the door to the knock box was opened it was 

observed that the sow blinked, and no otherconscious 

behaviors were observed. (b) (6) immediately grabbed the 

pre-loaded captive bolt gun from the edge ofthe knock 

box, the sow had to be rolled over to reach her head to 

administer the knock correctly. The knock was then 

administered correctly and then was rendered 

unconscious atthat time. The sow was then shackled and 

hoisted into the airfor bleeding. I verbally informed (b) (6) 

that a non-egregious humane handling 

noncompliance would be issued for the mis stun ofthe 

sow. I(b) (6) along with (b) (6) observed the rest 

of stunning of the Hogs for the days slaughter activities and 

observed that all the animalswere stunned correctly. The 

plant failed to comply with 9 CFR 313.30a(3). No tag was 

used, after reviewing the plants his1Dry no other 

noncompliance's were found with the same cause'in the 

past90 days. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 48 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M4975+P497 Dale T . Smith and fD46452CB-E136 IYC3511 03/29/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 HATS Category II: Truck Unloading and HATS Category V: OPEN 

5 Sons Meat -4FAF-8D07-2E6 033529N Humane Handling HandJing ofSuspects and Disabled On 3/29/21, at 

Packing 

Company Inc 

C4AF29672} -1 approximately 0556 hours, I observed the following while 

watching a load of cattle being offloaded from a 

semi-trailer. There were multiple non-ambulatory disabl'ed 

(NAD) cattle in multiple areas ofthe trailer. During ihe 

process ofeulhaniz,ing NAD animals and using a skid steer 

to drag them off. the trailer was pulled away from the 

unloading, ramp. While oneofthe NAD animals was being 

prepared to be dragged off, after stunning, another NAD 

animal became ambulatory. The animal stood up and then 

proceeded to quickly ma.ke its way toward the rear door of 

the trailer. The skid steer bucket was in a raised position 

and in contact with the rearofthe trailer. The animal 

proceeded tojump from the trailer, overthe skid steer 

bucket, and onto the ground Which was approximately 

three feet down. I observed the animal after it jumped off 

the truck and saw that it was an angus steeror heifer. I did 

notobserve any visible signs of injuryand the animal was 

able to ambulate nonnally. I notified (b) (6) 

of the noncompliance. There have been no other 

noncompliances for the same mot cause within the last 90 

days. 

M4975+P497 Dale T . Smith and {5EE6398F-C25 IYC0310 03/31/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS Categories 3 and 4On 3/31/2021 at approximately OPEN 

5 Sons Meat C-4DD2-8FBC-1 035531N Humane Handling 0515 hours,(b } (6) was viewing the cattle in the 

Packing 

Company Inc 

944825.5621C} -1 holding pens at rest for antemortem lnspeGtion when he 

identified thecattle in Pen 2 not having enough room to lie 

down. There were 12 head in the pen. 9 beef cows and 3 

dairy cows. and none were lying down. These cattle were 

held in this pen overnight.(b ) (6) applied retain tag 

B43736935 toPen 2 for me to observe when I cameinto 

work. and he continued antemortem inspection. When I 

cameoutside at approximately 0545 hours. ( b) ( 6) was finishing antemortem Jnspection when he notified me 

ofhis concern aboutovercrowding.in pen 2. with thecattle 

not having room to lie down in the pen ovemiqht. I first 

observed the cattlein the pen at rest then (b) (6) 

moved the cattle in pen 2 around for me to 

obse1ve them in mo1ion. In motion, they could all access 

water if they used force to shove other cattle outofthe 

way. I did not see any animals lying down in pen 2 and 

determined that there was not enough space for all cattle to 

lie down overnight. ( b ) (6) removed retain tag 

B4373693S at aP.proximately 0600 hours. This is a 

noncompliance wlth 9 CFR 313.2(e). There have been no 

Humane Handling NR's or MOl's documented for this same 

root cause within thepast 90 days. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 49 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M6004+P600 

4+V6004 

WolfPack 

Meats / University 

of Nevada Reno 

{1,1184184-F19A, 

475A-835B-954E 

707BAABA} 

QDA371 

4023619 

N-1 

02/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On 2118/21 at approximately 1300 hours, 1, (b) (6) 

, and (b) (6) observed the 

following non-compliance while performing as HATS task. 

Seven seGtions offence in the pig/ lamb slaughter chute 

had broken welds on the supports exposing sharp edges. 

These areas are approximately 32 inches from the ground 

and could potentially cause iniury orpainto animals. 

(b) (6) was shown the areas of 

concern. There was no evidence that these issues had 

caused harm to any animals on site. I searched the 

previous 90 days ofNRs and found no NR with Uke or 

simitar circumstances. § 313.1 Livestock pens, driveways 

and ramps. (a) Livestock pens, driveways and ramps shall 

be maintained in good repair. They shall be free from 

sharp or protruding objects which may, in the opinion of 

the inspector, cause injury or painto the animals. Loose 

boards, splintered or broken planking, and unnecessary 

openings where the head, feet, orlegs of an animal may 

be injured shall·be repai'red. 

CLOSED 

M648-2 York Meats {8166400E-02C1 

-4EA1-895D-BA 

F8C2808D30} 

UPJ5713 

015020N 

-1 

01/13/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On January 13, 2021 , at approximately 0816 hours, while 

performing HATS Ill: Water/Feed, the following 

non-compliance was identified. Whilewalking around the 

pens outsideto make sure all lfvestock had access to 

water, I observed with (b) (6) in the 

establishments "pen 3-- that the animals did not have 

access 'to water. The water was frozen and had a thick 

sheetof ice that the animals would'vebeen incapable of 

breaking through. I then proceeded to the other pens in the 

outside area and identified one other pen that had frozen 

water; however, the Ice was not as thkk and had the 

appearance ofcracks in the ice. I informed Plant Owner, 

Mr. Lawrence Morr, Sr. ofmy findings and told him I would 

be documenting a noncompliance based on these 

observations. Mr. Mori then went outside and broke up the 

tee so the animals could access the water fn the holding 

pens. This fs a noncompliance with Title 9 CFR 313.1(e), 

which states ''Animals shall have access to waterin all 

holding pens and. ifheld longer than 24 hours. access to 

feed:· 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 50 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M6482 York Meats {EBA5F6C6,24C UPJ5413 01/13/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) On January 13, 2021, at approximately 0855 hours while CLOSED 

8-41 A6-B6BA-66 013020N Humane Handling performing HATS VIII Slunninq Effectiveness rospection on 

E766D21694} -1 161 the kill floor atYork Meals, I(b) (6) along with it,, 

observed the following non,compliance. While 

observing plantemployees on the kill floor, I heard a 

gunshot. 1stattemptknocking a heifer in the knock box, 

followed by loud vocalizations ofthe animal heard on the 

slaughter fioor and banging sounds on metal knock box fiip 

door, followed by a second gunshot, 2nd attemptto knock 

heifer in knock box. The second shot was fired 

approximately 5 seconds after the first shot. After hearing 

the first kmick followed by animal vocalization, Iwent to the 

knock box, and observed thatthe second knock to the 

heifer rendered the animal unconscious.(b) (6) 

stated that two knock-s were applied to the heifer. 

When the animal was brouqht onto the kill floor 

establishment employee, (b) (6) stated thatthe 1st 

knock attempt was with a 22 caliber handgun and the 2nd 

knock was conducted with the backup stunning device.45 

caUber/410 gauge Rifle in orderto render the animal 

4nconscious. After removal of the hide from the head, 

there were two apparent knock holes in the head. I 

informed Mr. lawreance Mori, Sr. that I would be 

documenting a noncompliance based on !his inddent. No 

U.S. retain tags were applied to the knock box due to the 

establishment taking immediate corrective actions. In 

reviewing the previous 90 days of noncompliance reports 

one was found (UPJ0015123702N),This is. a 

noncompliance with 313.16(a)(1 ); "The firearms shall be 

employed In thedelivery ofa bulletor projectile into the 

animal in accordance with this section so as to produce 

Immediate unconsciousness in the animal by a single shot 

before itis shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast, or cut The 

animal shall be shot in such a manner that they will be 

rendered unconscious with a minimum of excitement and 

discomfort.." 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 51 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M6482 York Meats {836029D1-44D8 UPJ2109 02/1'0/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) On February 10, 2021 , at approximately 0615 hours while CLOSED 

-422A-M5D-6BA 024611N Humane Handling performing HATS VIII Stunning Effectiveness on the kill 

13CF85AC8} -1 floor atYork Meats, I observed the following 

non,compliance. While observing plant employees on the 

kill floor, I heard a gunshot. 1st attempt knocking the cow in 

!he knock box, followed by loud vocalt2ations of the animal 

heard on the slaughter floor and banging sounds on metal 

knock box flip door. followed by a secondgunshot, 2nd 

attemptto:knock the cow in the knock box. The second 

shotwas fired approximately 5-7 seconds aft.er the-first 

shot Aft.er hearing the first knock followed by animat 

vocalization. I went to the knock box, and observed that the 

second qunshot to the animal rendered it unconsci.ous. ,.,,., 

stated th.attwo knocks were applied to 

the cow in order to property stun the animal. I asked"''"' 

which rireamis heused to perform stunning he 

told me the first shot was with the .357 which did not put 

the animal down (renderil unconscious) so he followed up 

with the .410 shotgun in orderto property knock the cow. 

(b) (6) then explained to me thatthe animal turned its 

head as he was about to fire the initial 'knock, which 

caused the shot to slightly mi'ss where he was aiming. He 

then informed me that at that time he grabbed the .41 O 

rifle, in order to properly knock (render it unconscious) the 

animal. When the animal was brouqht onto the kill floor 

estabffshment employee, (b) (6) stated thatthe 1st 

knock attemptwas with a .357 caliber handgun with 

jacketed hollow point ammunition and the 2nd knock was 

conducted with the backup stunning device which is a .410 

gauge shotgun loaded with "slug" ammunition. After 

removal of the hide ftom the head, there were two gunshot 

wounds in the head. Mr. Mori Jr. stopped production until 

the plantiilled out its "Mis Stun Log·," then resumed once 

they had completed itand shown it to IPP. I informed Mr. 

Lawrence Mori Jr. that I would be documenting a 

noncompliance based on this incident. No U.S. retain tags 

were applied to the knock box due to the establishment 

taking immediatecorrective actions. Upon reviewing the 

previous 90 days the following NRS were found and will be 

linked>in PHIS: UPJ5413013020N and UPJ0015123702N 

This is a noncompliance with313.16(a)(1); "The firearms 

shall be employed in the delivery ofa bulletor projectile 

into the animal .in accordance with this section so as to 

produce immediate unconsciousness in the animal by a 

single shot before it is shackled, hoisted. thrown,.cast. or 

cut. The animal shall be shot in such a manner that they 

will be rendered unconscious with a minimum of excitement 

and discomfort." 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 52 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Descript ion Status 

M301+V301 Yosemite Valley 

BeefPacking 

Co.. Inc. 

{8235E92B-C72C 

-4CEA,90B3-037 

1565E895A} 

TOH4515 

011 518N 

-1 

01/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313,2 On January 18, 2021 the following noncompliance was 

identified:Atapproximately 0645 hours,{b) (6) 

noncompliance under HATS: Category 

Ill-Water and Feed Availability while performing ante 

mortem inspection. There were approximately 10 cattle 

present in the lane in front of pens 1, 2, 3, 4 thatdid not 

have water available. These cattle were unloaded Sunday 

nightJanuary 77. 2021 or early morning on Monday 

January 18, 2021. (b) (6b notified (b) (6) 

.(b)(6) notified ( )(6) of 

the noncompliance with 9 CFR313.2(e) as 10 animals did 

not have access to water. Immediate corrective action was 

CLOSED 

taken by moving the cat(le and making water available at 

approximately 0655 hours. Tile animals did not immediately 

start to drink water as soon as itwas made available, 1

"' "" 

was verbally informed thata noncompliance report 

would be documented for failure to meet the above 

regulatory requirement. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 53 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M400 Los Banos {9DCC034C-3C8 ZJG0617 02/03/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) HATS VIII: Stunning EffectivenessAt approximately 1213 CLOSED 

Abattoir A-47C1 -AAAF-B 023203N Humane Handling hours while performing postmortem inspection, (b) (6) 

CA0773E7970} -1 heard the sound ofthe •captive boltfiring, then 

the knock box gate swung open to·drop the cow on the kill 

floor, and suddenly the cow was standing in the sticking 

area just beside the knock box. (b) (6) observed the cow 

being immediately re-stunned successfully within 30 

seconds on the kill floor in the sticking area. Al 

approximately 1215 hours, (b) (6) went into the USDA office 

to inform (b) (6} that there had been a 

conscious cow standing on the kill floor. (b) (6) arrived 

at the kill floor at approximately 1220 hours.) An 

examination ofthe head of the cow showed two holes, 

indicatinq that the cow 11ad been shot twice, which differed 

from (b) (6) statement that the animal had not 

been stunned prior to standing in the sticking area. ,. ~ 

thatthe cow was only stunned once when 

on the kill floor. Thiswould indi.cate that the cow received 

a knock in the box that was ineffective at rendering it 

unconscious throughout shackling and sticking as required 

by 9 CFR 313.1 S(w discussed the matter with 

h \IF.\ Ian b )(6) nd stated that this was a 

humane handling n nee. as the sl'Unner had fail'ed 

to realize that the-first stun was not effective and rolled the 

cow onto the kill floor. (b) (6) rejected the knock box at 

approximately 1300 hours with U.S. Rejected tag 

B38163607, instructing (b} (6) and(b ) (6} thatthey could 

complete slaughter of the animals that were already 

knocked and inside the kill fl.oar. (b) (6) advised them 

that FSIS would require a formal response for corrective 

actions to prevent reoccurrence before the knock box was 

released. g CPR 313.1 S(a) requires that the captive bolt 

stunner shall be applied to the livestock so a_s to produce 

immediate unconsciousness in the animals, and thal they 

shall be stunned in such a manner that they will be 

rendered unconscious with a minimum of excitement and 

discomfort. The delay in time between the first and second 

stun, and the fact thalthere was a conscious animal on the 

kill fldor post-stunning indicates noncompliance with this 

regulation. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 54 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M400 Los Banos {61862EAC-SE60 ZJG4913 03/17/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) HATS VIII: Stunning Effectiveness AL approximately 0900 CLOSED 

Abattoir -45CD-9029-414 034817N Humane Handling hours on March 17, 2021, (b) (6) was 

880167F6D} -1 performing ante-mortem inspection outside on the stunning 

platform ofM400. the Los Banos Abattoir. When the 

second cow for the day was stunned with the captive boll 

stunner,(b) (6) obseNed that the cow 

remained standinq, blinkinq and she could hear it 

vocalizing. (b) (6} observed that the stunner 

reloaded the captive boll gun before the second stun, 

which rendered it unconscious. Upon receiving.the detailed 

description from (b) (6) , at approximately 

0915 the SPHV informed the(b) (6) 

thatthis was a humane handling violation,. slaughter was to 

be discontinued, and applied U. S. Rejected tag 

838163821 lo the knocking QOX gate. Inspection ofthe 

skinned head of the cow involved showed a captive bolt 

hole in the correct location of the forehead, butthe 

damageto the bone was in an oval/teardrop shape, and a 

probing instrumentindiec1ted that the path of the boltwas at 

an angle. The second captive bolt hole was atthe base of 

the skull, direcUy into the brain stem. 9 CFR 313.1 S(a)(1) 

requires thatthe captive bolt stunner shall be applied to the 

livestock so as to produce immediate unconsciousness in 

the animals, and thatthey will be rendered unconscious 

with a minimum ofexcitement and discomfort. The incident 

described above is noncompliance with this regulation. It is 

noted by the SPHVthat a slmilar violation of9 CFR 

313.1S(a) occurred on February 3, 2021, due to a failed 

initial stun that resulted in the conscious cow at the 

bleeding area. NR ZJG0617023203N / 1 was issued for 

that noncompliance, and this NR will be linked to itfor 

similar cause, Upon receiving corrective actions from 

M400 management. the SPHV informed (b) (6) thatthe 

knocking box tag would be removed, which was performed 

at approximate'ly 1.015 hours, and the plant resumed 

operations. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 55 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M400 Los Banos {4919ECA9-7F09 ZJG2716 03/24/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) On Wednesday, March 24, 2021, atapproximately 1235 OPEN 

Abattoir -47CF-8067-A1A 032724N Humane Handling hours. I, (b) (6) , observed the 

373F13E30} -1 following humane handling non-compliance, At 

approximately 1235 hours, whil,e standing by the knock box 

performing HATS category VIII (Stunning Effectiveness), I 

observed a plantemployee ineffectively stun a dairy cow in 

the knock box. The plant employee applied and 

discharged the captive bolt gun on the left side of the 

forehead of the dairy cow. The dairy cow remained 

standing in the knock box. Within approxJmalely 5 

seconds. the plant employee applied an effective captive 

bolt stun to the middle ofthe cow's forehead. The dairy 

cow immediately collapsed in the knock box and was 

unconscious. I then went inside and observed 1he cow's 

forehead before they shackled the cow. At that time. I 

could only see one knock hole in the middle ofthe 

forehead. The plant employee that stunned the cow told 

me that the first captive bolt gun did notdischarge. I 

waited on the slaughter floor until the cow's head was 

skinned and removed. I then observed the skinned head of 

the dairy cow and confirmed that there were two knock 

holes on the forehead, so the first captive bolt gun did 

discharge and was an ineffective stun. The first knock 

hole was on the left side ofthe forehead approximately 2 

inches from midline, and a probing instrument indicated 

thatthe path ofthe bolt was aimed slightly laterally away 

from thebrain. I appliedU.S. RejectTag# 838163822 to 

the knock box lo stop all further stunning. I informed"''.~• 

of the ineffective stun and 

that I tagged the knock box. I also informed him ofthe 

forthcoming non-compliance. Captive bolt stunners must be 

applied to produce'tmrnediate unconsciousness. This is a 

non-compliance ofthe regulalory requirements of 9 CFR 

313.15(a)(1). Similar violations of9 CFR 313.1S(a)(1) 

occurred on 3/17/21 , documented in NR 

ZJG4913034817N/1•, and on 2/3121 , documented in NR 

ZJG0617023203N/1. Both non-compliances were issued 

for an ineffective stun, and this non-compliance will be 

linked'to them for similar cause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 56 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M4928+P492 Islamic {CF2B6877-E4C DIDS709 01/29/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 On 1/30/2021, from approximately 0830 to 1030 hours, I, OPEN 

8 Meat&Poultry 9--41 E3-99E0-40 023501N Humane Handling (b) (6) , tnspe.cted the pens and alleyways 

Co. 21215B1490}, -1 (HATS Category ·IV. Ante-mortem Inspection), during an 

odd-hour inspection, I observed a small piece of wire 

fence panel attached to the pen S gate (alleyway side of 

the gate). The small wire fence panel extended pastthe 

west end of the pen S gate, and the Swire ends of the 

panel had sharp pointed wire ends that extended outward 

creating a sharp object hazard for any animals thatwould 

move past/near the west end ofthe gate whenever the gate 

was opened. This was a noncompliance with Title 9 CFR 

313.l(a). I applied U.S. Reject tag B45402611 to the pen 5 

gate. No animals had access to the pen S gate sharp 

protruding wires al the time of inspection, and no animals 

showed any signs of injury thatcould have resulted from 

previous exposure to the sharp wires. I also observed a 

front corner (low end) of thewood unloading ramp 

positioned underneath the ante-mortem pen gate and into 

the pen space approximately 12-1 S incbes; the comerof 

the wooden unloading ramp protruded into the pen space 

created a significant trip hazard forany animals placed in 

the pen. This was a noncompliance with Title 9 CFR 

313. l(a). I applied U.S. Reject tag B45402610 to the 

ante-mortem pen gate, No animals were iMhe.antemortem 

pen and no animals had access to the trip hazard attime 

of inspection, and no animals showed any signs ofinjury 

that could have resulted from previous exposure 'to the trip 

hazard. (b) (6) 

was notified ofthe noncompliance. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 57 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M4928+P492 Islamic {C3463ADE-630 DID3416 03/17/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 At approximately 1345 hours while monitoring conditions in OPEN 

8 Meat& Poultry F-4594-87F4-4E 032617N Humane Handling the livestock holding pens, I observed the following 

Co. 832BDE3FEB} -1 noncompliance. l'n animal holding pen#4 there were 

approximately 40 goats'in the pen. These animals areheld 

in the pen by the establishmentfor greater than 24 hours. 

There was little to no remaining unoccupied space the pen. 

The number of animals in the pen made it difficult foran 

individual animal to,move freely in the pen or reaoh the one 

water source. Additionally. the animal d'enslty was such 

!hat it would not have been possible for all animals to lie 

down atthe same time. 1found the alley way and the back 

pens to contain approximately 200 lambs with the only 

available water being in the back pens making ii difficult for 

all of them to gain access. With taking a quick head count 

I found the holding pens on the official premises to contain 

approximately 480 head of sheep and goats. The number 

ofanimals exteeds what the facility can storeto meet the 

requirements ofCFR 3132(e). 9CFR 313.2(e), which 

states in part animals shall have access to water in all 

holding pens and, ifheld longer than 24 hours. access to 

feed. There shall be sufficient room in the holdinq pen for 

animals heJd ovemiqht to lie down. I show (b) (6} 

my findings and' informed 

him ofthe forth coming non-compliance record}";" 

moved some animals around lo give them more 

spacing and better access to water. 

M4969+P496 J J Meat Co. {F6C02C48-0BE JCO3017 03/11/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1,313.2 At approximately 1445 whne conducting HATs tasks on OPEN 

9 9-4EA4-96AC-D1 03561:SN HumaneHandling goats I heard goats crying in distress. Upon going to the 

876F7E91EC} -1 area where the goats were crying. ·1 obseNed several goats 

jammed together on lhe. scale area ofthe livestock pens. I 

could not see the goats thatwere crying as they had fa'llen 

under the other qoats ln the scale area. Establishment 

employee {b) {6) ) who ls responsible for the moving and 

stunning of the goats started pullTng goats forward into the 

alley in front ofthe scale, until he was able to gel the 

majority ofthe goats offthe 2 goats ln distress.I 

tmmedlately stopped the. stunning procedures and informed 

the PHV and FLS of the situation. Upon conferral with 

them and the fact that no animals appeared injured the 

establishmentwas fnformed ofthe noncompliance andthe 

forth coming NR. After correctlve. actions and Preventive 

measures were given the establishment was allowed to 

return to slaughterin_g animals.This noncompliance does 

not meetthe requirements setforth in block 6 of this NR in 

that. the establishment failed to handle. livestock in a 

manner to prevent Injurious harm or pain to occur during 

driving or handlin.g of such animal or animals. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 58 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M934 Charlie 

DiMaria & Sons 

{83A47B44-2E88 

-4EEA-BCB6-08 

A88BEBD7D5} 

VMH241 

0021802 

N-1 

02/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 Atapproximately 0700 hours, I, (b) (6) 

(b) (6), observed the following noncompliance while 

performing a Livestock Humane Handling Task HATs 

Category II Truck Unloadjng: The base at the ramp had a 2 

feetmetal rail that was no longer adhered (raised) to the 

ground creating 4 areas of sharp edges at-every -4 

inches. This is an area of where a majority of the cattle 

step on to tum righL According to 9 CFR313.1(a), 

''Livestock pens, driveways and ramps shall be maintained 

in good repair. They shaH be free from sharp or protruding 

objects which may, in the opinion ofthe inspeGtor, cause 

injury orpain to the animals. Loose boards, splintered or 

broken planking, and unnecessary openings where the 

head. feet. orlegs ofan animal may·be iniured shall be 

repaired." (b) (6) , was 

notified ofthe noncompliance. This noncompliance record 

wilt be linked to VMH0618121123N and VMH4209113430N. 

CLOSED 

M934 Charlie 

DiMaria & Sons 

{8B46CDF5-9C9 

A-43EE-AD72-A 

D091 B8D925C} 

VMH281 

4020203 

N-1 

02/03/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.1 At approximately 1130 hours. I. (b) (6) 

, whlle performing a Livestock Humane Handling 

Task HATs Category IV Antemortem Inspection (Facilities) 

observed the foHowing noncompliance: In Pen 10, at the 

location ofthe feedfng trough, a -5 foot wooden beam was 

split diagonally full length into two pieces, one piece was 

adhered to the beam perpendicular to it, and theother 

piece was attached to the beam with the other end into the 

feeding trol,\gh.. Pens, driveways, and ramps must be 

maintained in good repair, Loose boards, splintered or 

broken planks, broken pipe rails. broken unloading ramps, 

and unnecessary openlngs where the head, feet., or legs of 

an animal may be in.lured must be repaired. Todd Manning, 

Plant Manager, and (b) (6) . was 

notified ofthe noncompliance. This NR will be linked 

lo VMH2410021802N, VMH0618121123N, and 

VMH4209113430N. 

ClOSED 

M934 Charlie 

DiMaria & Sons 

{9DC4B1,F4-8702 

-4237-84A7-AD4 

079ECB1F8} 

VMH531 

0024408 

N-1 

02/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On Februarv 8th, 2021, atapproximately 0720 hours, I," "'' 

, observed the following noncompliance while 

performing a Livestock Humane Handling Task: In the 

serpentine leading to the knock box, there were 2 metal 

rods with jaggededges projecting approximately 1 inch 

from the ground. no longer encased in cemenl The 

projecting metal rods with jagged edges may cause harm if 

stepped on by cows. Regulatory control action was taken 

place with a U.S. Rejected tag No. B45702997. (b) (6) 

was notified of the 

noncompliance. Livestock pens, driveways, and ramps 

shall be maintained in'good repair. They shall be free from 

sharp or protruding objects which may cause injury orpain 

to the animals. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 59 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M45MP4988 

+V454 

Owyhee Meat 

Company 

{870CA0AF-588 

B-4E64-9622-465 

HKD3208 

024505N 

02/05/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category Ill: Waterand Feed Availability At 0700 

hours on 02/05/2021. (b) (6) performed ante-mortem 

CLOSED 

9C1D34D08} -1 inspection for animals presented for slaughter at M454 

Owyhee Meat Company. Seven young cattle, which were 

assessed by (b) (6) during ante-mortem inspection on 

02/04/2021 at 0700 hours, were included in the qroup of 

animals to be assessed on 02/05/2021. (b) (6} 

inquired ifthese animals had been fed and the operator 

replied thatthe animals had not. (b) (6) was verbally notified ofthe impending 

non-compliance record.The cattle were first in the 

slaughterline-up on 02/50/2021 and were all slaughtered 

by approximately 0830. There has not been a 

non,-compliance issued forthe same rootcause at M454jn 

- the last 90 days. 

M6423+P642 Walt's Wholesale f0DB2AE17-4395 MFO251 01/16/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(2), At approxlmately 1142 hours, On January 16, 2021. While CLOSED 

3+V6423 Meats. Inc. -4CD0-87D2-760 2011418 Humane Handling 313.2 performing antemortem inspection from the AM box I 

42DB6C7C9} N-1 {b) (6) observedifour black beefcattle 

(angus) belng driven to the knock box loading chute. The 

cattle were upset and refusing to go up into the chute and 

had turned back toward the pens. I then observed a plant 

employeestart jabbing the cattle with the electric prod. The 

employee was intensely jabbi•ng the cattle1n the face 

several times (more than 5 trmes). I told the. empJoyee. to 

stop what he was doing and notified(b) (6} 

. I then notifiE:d my (b) { 6 / 

and Mr. Rafael Gomez (Plant Manager). 

Mr. Gomez was verbally notified that an NR would be 

tssued and that a MOI would be written. This is a violation 

ofthe above listed 9CFR regulations, and the HATS 

Category VI Electric Prodding/ Alternative object. The 

plantimplemented their corrective action and retrainlng of 

the employee. A review ofthe company's NR history 

shows no similar noncompliance with the same root cause 

within the last 90 days. Continued failure to meet these 

Regulatory requirements could resultin additional 

Regulatory or Administrative actiori. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April S, 2021 60 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M9228+P922 Carlton Packing {11A188CO-B7B YQB3514 03/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category VIII: Stunning Effectiveness Al (b) (6) 

8+V9228 Company A-4EDS-83B1-C 033702N Humane Handling approximately 0620 hours: A Carlton Farms employee 

D6t80FS966C} -1 informed Food Inspector Burge and Supervisory 

Consumer Safely Inspector (SCSI) Puikunas of a hog 

which stopped walking while in the alley to the electrical 

stun area. 0621 hours: (b) (6) 

accompanies Mr. Kuhnly-Rodgers to the alley where hog is 

immobile and restinq on hind quarters O.e.. in a dog sitting 

position). (b) (6) observes that the hog is 

alert, breathing normal, aware of its surroundrngs and 

allows the establishmentto perform a "Knock and Drag''. 

0623 hours: (b) (6} arrived with a blue 

hand-held captive bolt device and without ar,y restra.int 

administered the first stun attempt lo the hog. (b) 16) 

heard vocal sounds from the hog and 

observed the animal remain fn a sitting upright position with 

the head upright and moving in lateral directions looking at 

surroundings with eyes tracking. (b) (6) 

immediately vacated the alleyway where the hog was being 

stunned andgoes into the designated stun area, 

approximately 20 feet away, to retrieve the .9reen 

hand-held captive bolt device. 0624 hours: "'' ••' 

returned and administered the second 

stun attempt. {b) (6) observes that the 

second stun is ineffective. Fl Burge observes the hog 

voca.lize for a few seconds, head remains upright and 

moving laterally, observing its surroundings with eyes 

tracking .and remaining In the sitting position. A few 

seconds later vocalization stops butanimal remains 

conscious with head moving occasionally. 0625 hours: 

(b) (6) asks (b) (6) where the 

back-up gun is? (b} ( 6) states this is the 

back-up qun. At approximately 0627 hours: (bl (G) 

goes from the pen alley to the employee 

break room and sees (b) (6) 

emerging from his office with fresh captive bolt 

device shells. At approximately 0628 hours: (b) (6) 

observed (b) (6) re-load one of the hand-held 

captive bolt devices and administers an effective stun 

application which renders the animal unconscious. During 

this lime (b) (6) had gone to the USDA 

office and informed ~b) (6) ofthe incidenL (h} (61 

asks (b) 6) Lo immediately note 

lhe time and write down her observations of the incident 

including location, names of individuals present and lime 

frames. At approximately 0630 hours: (b) (6) 

informs (b) (6) !hat the 

scalding tank will be placed under requlatory control wilh 

U.S. Reject tag B35731564. (b) (6) asks if he can run 

out the heated hogs and eviscerate them so that!here are 

no issues with quality. (b) (6) allows the 

evisceration of 15 hogs hanging on the rail and asks that 

no otherhoqs be killed. At approximately ,0535 hours: 

(b) (6) has a meeting wilh 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 61 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

and discusses the facts of the incident. "''"' (b} (6~ (b (6 and (b) (6) state they believe the cause 

of the irJeffective captive bolt applications is wet shells. 

(b) (6) states he is going to type up (b) (6) 

obseNations and submit them to Denver District 

Office through supeNisory persohnel (b) (6) 

obseNed the dressed head and verified .accurate 

placement and penetration of the stunning attemptThere 

have be.en no noncompliance record ofthe same root 

cause issued in the past 90 days. 

M9228+P922 Carlton Packing {B6640C94-A1FE YQB1408 03/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category VUI - Stunning Effect1veness On OPEN 

8+V9228 Company -4F26-AFA8-E74 032324N Humane. Handlin_g 03/23/2021 while performing the.30-Day Verification Plan 

5D2AF2B9F} -1 (VP) visit at approximately 1430 hours, l.{b) (6) 

observed the establishment attemptto stun a 

non-ambulatory swine in the pens With a hand-held captive 

bolt (HHCB) device. When I arrived at holding pen #17, 

establishment personnel alreadyhad two HHCB devices 

and additional ammunition in a watertight container readily 

available. I obseNed the stun operator apply the first stun 

attempt with ·the HHCB device to a non-ambulatory swfne 

which was in sternal recumbency. Following the ineffective. 

stun attempt, I observed the animal remain conscious, 

vocalize repeatedly and attempt to drag itselfaway from the 

stun operator utilizing its front limbs whiletrying to stand 

with fts h1ndlimbs. I obseNed the stun operator 

immediately retrieved the backup HHCB device and apply 

a second stun attempt within approximately seven seconds. 

I obseNed the second stun to be effective at rendering the 

animal insensible. I observed the stun operator and 

establlshment trainee verify insensibility by checking the 

animal for a corneal reflex. I observed the animal 

remained unconscious while being dragged to the 

slaughter fioor for shackling, hoisting and bleeding. I 

verbally notified the slaughter floor supervisor that I would 

be documenting a noncompliance. A regulatory contml 

action was not taken as immediate and effective corrective 

actions were observed. The DenverDistrict Office was 

contacted. Upan review ofthe dressed and split head. I 

observed two stun holes had penetrated the skull. Both 

penetrating holes appeared to be wlthin the appropriate 

anatomical ·location, however the more rostral ofthe two 

penetrating holes did not penetrate thmugh the sinus bone 

to the brain. This noncompHance is being assoc1ated 

NR # YQB35l4033702N"1 documented on 3/2/2021 for 

same root cause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 62 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M11032+P1 1 Northwest {891A45CC-1 DO AOC231 01/06/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1) HATS Category VIII - Stunning Effectiveness On CLOSED 

032+V11032 Premium Meats, B-488A-8685,.CC 3012606 Humane Handling 01/06/2021 at approximately 0715 hours, l,(b ) (6) 

LLC 154E6C738F} N-1 observed the establishment attemptto stun 

a bovine. I had observed the stun operator calmly move 

the steer from the pens, through the chute and into the stun 

box. The animal was vocalizing while in the stun box, but I 

did not observe an underlying cause forthe vocalization. 

The initial stun ilPPlfed with the hand-held captive bolt 

(HHCB) device was ineffective as the animal remained 

standing and was attempting to tum around inside the stun 

box; eyes were tracking; and the animal exhibited rhythmic 

breathing. I observed blood in the fur around the 

penetrating stun hole on the front ofthe skull and blood 

dripping from both nostrlls. There were no signs of 

distress or any further vocalization, The establishment stun 

operator immediately reloaded the HHCB device and 

applied a second stun attempt within approximately sixty 

seconds. The second stun was immediately effective, and 

the anima.t remained unconscious throughout the 

shackling, hoisting and bleeding process. A regulatory 

control action was not taken as immediate and effective 

corrective actions were observed and this was the last 

bovine being slaughtered forthe day. The Denver District 

Office was contacted, Establishment management was 

verbally no6fiedofthe noncompliance. Upon review ofthe 

dressed head, I observed two stun holes had penetrated 

the skull. Both penetrating hates ap,Peared to be within the 

appropriate anatomical location, howeverthe more dorsal 

of the two penetrating holes did not have an acceptable 

trajectory. The establishment is currently under a Humane 

Handling Verification Plan due to multiple ineffective 

stunning attempts. 

M11032+P11 Northwest {8DD54BDB-1 93 AOC411 02103/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS Category Ill: Water and Feed Availability At OPEN 

032+V11032 Premium Meats, E-4A25-8062-3B 2020103 HumaneHandling approximately 1010 on 02/03/2021. (b) (6) observed 

LLC F050664F00} N-1 two pigs in a holding pen at Northwest Premium Meats 

M11032. The two pigs had arrived onsite at approxfmately 

0935 on 02/02/2021 . The establishment had not offered 

the pigs feed since their arrival onsite. { b} ( 6) was verbally notified ofthe 

impending non-compliance record. Th~pigs were 

slaughtered at approximately 1100. The establishment did 

not have available feed onsilefor the p[gs and would not 

have been able to acquire and feed the animals before 

their scheduled slaughter Ume. There has not been a 

non-compliance for the same rootcause at M11032ln the 

last 90 days. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 63 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M11032+P1 1 

032+V11032 

Northwest 

Premium Meats, 

LLC 

{3C88D4F4,2B3F 

-4384-92CA-BC2 

99CE11DC1} 

AOC070 

9024725 

N-1 

02/24/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.16(a)(1) HATS Category Vlll: Stunning Effectiveness On 2/24/21 al 

approximately 0930, I. (b) (6) was verifying HATS 

Category VIII, stunning effectiveness. !·observed the stun 

operator move a sow through the chute and into the stun 

box. The stun operator applied the first stun using a .22 

firearm. After the first stun was applied, the sow went down 

but was slill rhythmically breathing. I observed about 5 to 6 

breaths in succession, as well as blinking. I was also able 

to. observe the saw's eyes tracking movement The stun 

operator immediately reloaded and applied a second stun 

attempt with the .22 firearm. Following the second stun 

attempt, the sow stood back up and shook its head side lo 

side. The stun operator immediately retrieved the backup 

.308 rifle and applied a third stun. The third stun with the 

.308 rifle successful!y rendered the sow unconscious. I 

informed (b) (6) , of the 

non-compliance. Regulatoty control was taken by placing 

US RejectTag B35205715 althe stunning area. Denver 

District Management was contacted through supervisory 

channels. n,e dressed head was examined, and three 

CLOSED 

penetrating stun holes were observed. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 64 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M11032+P1 1 Northwest {E41 F3258-BB8D AOCSS0 03/03/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) HATS Category VIII: Stunninq EffeclivenessOn 3/3/2021. CLOSED 

032+V11032 Premium Meats, -4691-9EC8·064 9030304 Humane Handling at approximately 1142, (b) (6) observed the following 

LLC E9D2C9CA0} N-1 non-compliance.The stun operator loaded two market hogs 

into the stunning area at NorthwestPremium Meats 

M11032 The stunning area for swine is a S'xS' area, 

enclosed by U1e concrete wall of the building on tl1e west 

side, tl1e concrete wall ofthe stun box on U1e soutl1 side, a 

soLid metal door ofthe stun box on the east side, and a 

metaJ "hog panel" gate approximately 3 feettall on tl1e north 

side. The stun operator effectively electrically stunned the 

first hog, and while retrieving the shackles to hoist this hog, 

the second hog witl1in tl1e stunning area jumped over the 

metal gate. The second hog appeared agitated when 

entering the stunning. area and did run 'into the gate once 

before tl1e jump. The hog moved tl1rough the kill floor and 

into a separate gut buggy wash and utility room. The first 

stun operator applied the first stun attempt using a .22 

magnum rifle. at an approximate distance of six feet, 

through the forehead of the hog. The hog dropped to the 

floor with its head and neck extended and upright I 

observed the hog blinking and turning its head and looking 

at my hand as I waved it to the side of its head. The 

second stun operator applied a second stun attempt, at a 

distance of approximately one inch and less than 10 

seconds after the first stun attempt, using the .22 magnum 

rifle through the forehead and the hog was confinned 

unconscious.The head ofthe affected hog was removed 

and skinned. There was a penetrating hole through the 

most dorsal aspect ofthe skull. A second penetrating hole 

was observed on midline approximately 2 inches above tl1e 

eyes.(b} (6) was outside the facility during the 

event and heard both stun attempts with the firearm less 

than 10 seconds apart This noncompliance was shared 

witl1 the Denver District Management team through 

supervisory channels.Theincident was discussed with''''", 

and he was verbally 

notified ofthe impending non-compliance report.This 

noncompliance is being associated with 

NR#AOC0709024725N issued on 2/24/2021 for same rdot 

cause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 65 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Descript ion St atus 

M11032+P1 1 Northwest {461 D716F-B2A 1 AOC321 03/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2(1} HATS Category VIII: Stunninq effectiveness At CLOSED 

032+V11032 Premium Meats, -46CC-AS1B-E.9 3033309 Humane Handling approximately 11:30 am, I (b) (6) observed three hogs 

LLC D4D6E2B907} N-1 moved Into the stunning area. The stun operator wentto 

stun the first hog utilizing electricaJ current The stun 

operator applied the first stun attempt behind the ears on 

the head. I observed the hog then fall over on itsside 

away from the stun operator causing the stun operatorto 

lose conlact between the electrical stunner and tbe hog. I 

observed the hog laying on •its side and vocalizing loudly 

until the second stun attempt was applied successfully 

behind the ears on the head about 3 seconds later. The 

anima_l was rendered unconscious and the stun operator 

applied a security stun to the chest I verbally notified ti/'' 

of the impending 

noncompliance. The Denver District Management Team 

was contacted via supervisory channels. Thjs 

noncompliance is being associated with 

NR#AOC5509030304N Issued on 3/3/2020 for same root 

cause. 

M12455+V12 Sanchez {29FC2C48-BM SCG221 02/20/2021 04C02 Uvestock 313.16(a)(1), On February 20, 2021 at approximately 0530.1m1161 OPEN 

455 Slaughterhouse 2-4430-BA71-6C 6035003 Humane Handling 313.16(a)(3), . while performing Livestock Humane 

8CBD2EF569} N-1 313.16(b)(1)(i), Handling tasR, noted a deficiency. While I was waiting for 

313.16(b)(2). the next carcass to come out of the stun box. I heard 1 

313.2(1} shot and the animal was notunconscious. I then heard a 

second shotand still the animal was alive. At this time. I 

wentto the stun box and demanded to put theanimal down 

now. l was askjng the stunner what happened, and he 

could not speak English. While I was talking to stunner and 

wentto the other side. I had noticed the sheep was 

chained up and already split and beheaded. I asked where 

the head went, and I was told it's out back and already 

gone. I notifled(b) (6) to contfnue to slaughter the 

last 2. You need to correct this stunning issue. I was told 

this stunner is one oftheir beststunnets and usually uses 

a flashlight since the stunning box area is dark and hard to 

see. IPP noticed there was a flashlight there but not betng 

used when I came to observe the 3rd shot. (b) (61 

had told rne that thls sheep came down from the 

mountains.(b~(6) that normally they do us a 

flashlight and as talked with the employee and Would 

watch each kill ofthe 2 piqs left. To ensure itdoes not 

happen again. I notified (b) (6) thatlhere is 

noncompliance with 9 CFR 313.2 (f). 313.16(a)(1). 

313.16(a)(3), 313.16(b)(1)(1), 313.1 6(b)(2) and the 

tssuance of the noncompliance report. IPP also notified 

(b) (6) Who ended up showing upjust;3s the 2 final pigs 

were slaughter and put away about 0645. I explained what 

happened and the issuanceofthe noncompliance report. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 66 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M18957 Ralphs Ranches, 

Inc. 

{97659862-01F8-

4056-9942-A0ZC 

0CE9719B} 

CWC230 

8010620 

N-1 

01/19/20:21 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313,2 January 1'9, 2021, while performing a PSIS Ante.-Mortem 

inspection, (b) (6) observed a Humane 

Handlinq noncompliance: At approximately 0705 hours, 

(b) (6) observed three ofthe pens that contained 

livestock destined for slaughter, the water in the stock tanks 

were frozen solid thus, the animals could not haveaccess 

to drinkinQ water. (b) (6) immediately notified 

(b) (6) of the issue. 

Plant corrective action by breaking the frozen solid water 

were implemented. (b) (6) was notified ofthe 

noncompliance and the forthcoming NR. The 

estabh.shment failed to comply with 9 CFR 313.2 

(2)(e) Animals shall have access to waterin all 11olding 

pens and, If held longer than 24 hours, accessto feed. 

There shall be sufficient room in the holding pen for 

animals held overnight to lie down. No similar 

noncompliance report with the same root cause within the 

lastJO days to associate it with. 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 67 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M1311 JBS Souderton, {242BC204-DA2 K!D3116 01/12/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1), On 01/12/2021 atapproximately 1407 hours operations OPEN 

Inc. D-4408,8107-11 010412N Humane Handling 37 3.1 S(a)(2) had temporarily ceased fora separate concern on the 

4660999998) -1 slaughter floor when a large hydraulic line ruptured at the 

base of the knock box resulting with l:he stun box restrainer 

minimally operable. There was one animal on belly band 

and another animal in queue near !he.descending stun 

area that was poised to descend into the conveyor 

position. The second animal could move forward pressing 

onto the firstanimal and a'lso back up to a standjng 

position. The {b) (6) ,was 

on !he shackle floor addressing the hydraulic failure when 

I, (b) (6) , called his attention to the second 

animal as ithad descended on top of the first animal. Upon 

coaxing !he anrmal to back up away from the stunning 

area, the back gate was opened and a plant employee 

drove a th.ird animal into the area, effectively pushing the 

third anUTiaJ onto the second animal which was now on top 

of the firstanima'I on the belly conveyor. Attempts to back 

this third animal up with an airwand.igitated it enough to 

the point of vocalization and frantic struggling. I then 

observed the anima.1 struggling because its leftfront hoof 

became entrapped in the stun boxsqueeze gate. I 

immediately advised the supervisor to stop trying to move 

!he animal. At this point, a small amount of hydraulic 

control returned and the supervisor told the stunning 

operator to open the restrainers to see ifthe animal could 

free itself, the operator moved the doors the wrong 

direction effectively dosing the doors harder on the 

entrapped foot and all hydraulic pressure had been 

expended and was unable to remove the added pressure 

on the leg, resulting in increased and persistent struggling 

and vocalization. The first two animals were effectively 

stunned and pulled out of the situation. The barn supervisor 

applied a hand-held captive bolt stun, while reaching over 

the side ofthe metal panel, to the trapped animal, which 

was ineffective. The animal vocalized, had rhythmic 

breathITTg, moved its head, and blinked after the firsl 

attempt. I immediately informed him the animal was still 

conscious and directed the supervisorto apply an 

additional stun attempt. He applied the second attempt 

which was ineffective due to the animal vocalizing, blinking, 

and rhythmic breathing with bloody nasal discharge moving 

in and out ofits nostrils with each breath. I immediately told 

the supervisor the animal was still conscious to which he 

disagreed and did not attempt a third knoc:k.. His rationale 

was thatthe stun had to be effective because he shot in 

"the same hole" and he left the stun box area ..A plant 

employee who was previously performing routine stunning 

procedures performed another stun. The employee utilized 

the belly conveyor and applied a captive bolt third stun 

which was effective, Regulatory control acUon was taken 

and tag #B-45450249 was applied to the stun box. Other 

personnel present and informed of the situation were(bl ,s\ ,(b) (6} • (b ) (6) , and Adrian 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 68 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

Ramos (General Manager). This is the establishment's 

failure to comply With the regulations of9 CFR 

313.15(a)(1) and 313.15(a)(2). 

M1311 JBS Souderton, 

Inc. 

{AE08062A-F5A2 

-4465-ASSD-3B4 

728BDA115} 

KID5108 

034108N 

-1 

03/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.1 This morning (3/8/21 ), while performing Ante-mortem 

inspec:;tion, I (b) (6) ) observed lhefoll'owing 

noncompliance. Steer Were moving 1ndepen9enuy from 

Pen 8 through the gate and into the alleyway to return to 

Pen 16. I observed several steer slip and fall to their knees 

on the smooth section ofconcrete flooring directly atthe 

exit of the pen. Steer immediately rose and continued 

forward. No evidence ofany injury was noted. Pen 8 and 

adjoinlng Pen, 9 was immedrately rejected with US 

REJECTED Tag B-45 449308.(b) (6) , 

(b) (6) was notified verbally and in Writing with this 

Noncompliance Record of the regulatory control action as 

a result of the establ1shments failure to compty with Code 

ofFederal Regulation Part 9 Section 313.1 (b). 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 69 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M1311 JBS Souderton, {O1BCF784-0B1 K!D4515 03/30/2021 04C02 Livestock 313,2 HATS Category IV-A~temortem Inspection On March OPEN 

Inc. 1-436E--9056-FS 035730N Humane Handling 30th at around 1017am i,(b) (6) , was performing 

BA7EACC3D2} -1 observations of employees moving cattle •in the crowd pen 

and serpentine area. Unusual and loud noises al the 

serpentine area caused me to go over and focus my 

attention there. I saw an. animal already down inlateral. 

recumbency and struggling at the mouth of the serpentine. 

Animals were trampling its body and tripping overiL I 

immediately called loudly to the serpentine and crowd pen 

operators to stop moving lhe an[mals, as it appeared that 

they were unaware of the situation. It took a bit, butthe 

downed animal righted itself and stood up, apparently 

unharmed. I spoke to the crowd pen operator and 

reminded him to pay attention and stop moving animals 

when one wentdown. I looked for a supervisor to express 

my concerns, but he was not in the barn atthat time. Less 

than 3 minutes later I was observing the same spot ahd the 

same operators. An animal went down Jn the circle and 

was being trampled by the very large group of other 

animals that were being pushed too fast over it by the same 

crowd pen operator I had just spoken to. The downed 

animal struggled and was trampled by several animals 

before my loud calls to the operator stopped the herding 

activity. As the other animals settled down, the downed 

animal righted itself and appeared unharmed. 

Momentarily, the (b) (6) , appeared 

at the serpentine and I informed him of the situation. Also 

informed and notified ofthe noncompliance and the 

establishment's failure to comply with the regulatory 

requirements of 9CFR 313.2(a) as they came out to lhe 

barn were (b) (6) 

(b) (6) . and (b) (6) . Moving animals into the 

serpentine wastemporarily halted. No corrective actions 

were discussed in my presence, but management talked 

with the operators and then restored ope.rations. 

M4763+P476 P&N Packing Inc. {5437C1A 1-3381 UVF2913 01/04/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 On January 4, 2021 atapproximately 0920hrs, while OLOSED 

3 •40A2-BD 76-478 014304N HumaneHandling performing a Humane Handling lhspeclion task at 

016490220} -1 establishment 4763, I obseNed the following 

non<ompliance: Due to harsh weather condlllons, Est. 

4763 did not begih unloading calves Until 0920 hrs. As the 

animals were finished betng unloaded from the firsttraller, 

I observed. in Pen #1. the calves walking up to the water 

bucket attempting to drink and not getting any water. I 

notified the nearest herdsman that Pen #1 was without 

water. The employee took Immediate corrective action and 

filled the water bucket. At this time, I infonned (b) (6) 

of this non•compliance and the v folation lo 

CFR 313.2(e). CFR313.2(e) states that all animals w111 

have access to Water at all times. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 70 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M8615+P861 

5 

Mussel man's 

Meats LLC 

{FB2DBEEF-305 

S..4524-A 189,96 

816B65ABAA} 

KAG0606 

031217N 

-1 

03/17/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(2) HATS Category VI- Electric. Prod/Alternative Object UseOn 

3/17/2021 al approximately 0655 hours while performing 

HATS Catego,:y VI Electric Prod/Alternative Object Use, 

SPHV Dr. Bianchi and I observed the following humane 

ham'Jlinq noncompliance in the holding pen. We observed 

(b) (6) repeatedly and 

intentionally strike a Holstein steer in the face with a rat(le 

paddle. The steerwas reluctant to move, and(b) (6) 

was attempting to drive itto the stunning area. We 

immediately took a regulatory control action (RCA) by 

instructing him to stop hitting the steer in the head. After 

he slopped, we verified the es\abLishment drive lhe steer to 

the stunning area humanely. I later notified Plant Manager 

Willy Leahy and (b) (6) of 

the noncompliance with 9 CFR313.2b. While{b) (6} 

was attempting lo move the, stubborn 

steer. he was repeatedly hitting the steer in the head with 

the rattle paddle. (b) (6) and I both told him to stop 

hitting the steer in the head. After being told to stop hitting 

the steer in the head, (b) (6) stopped hitting the steer in 

the head. 

CLOSED 

M9368 Zrlle Bros. 

Packing Co.,,lnc 

{EC6CBA36-359 

A-4E64--8BA2°C6 

B296DE35A7} 

GCl4612 

020722N 

-1 

02/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 On 02-22-2021 at approx. 0605 hours the following 

Non-Compliance Was observed. Durtng the Ante-Mortem 

lnspectfon part ofthe livestock humane handing task, 

Inspection noticed thatthere was not any water made 

available to the animals that were present Tn holdfng pens 1 

and 5. Thetroughs in each pen were dry and animals were 

in the pens at the time ofobservance. Es\ablfshment 

Co-owner Marko Zrile was verbally made awareofthis 

finding. This finding represents the Establishments inability 

to comply with 9CFR 313.2(e) {summary}Animals shall 

have access to water In all holding pens. 

CLOSED 

M9380+1!'938 

0 

Bierty's Meat 

Market 

{DE18F746-39B8 

-4585-AB94-ESD 

4014603E9} 

EHF4209 

035217N 

-1 

03/17/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(1) HATS Category VIII , Stunning Effectiveness On 17, 

March 2021 , at approximately 0918 hours while performing 

humanehandling verification activities at Establishment 

9380, the Establishment moved a market. hog· into the stun 

box for stunning. The employee performing the stunning 

used a captive bolt onthe first stunning attempt which 

caused the market hog to immediately fall to the floor and 

then immediately stood back up vocalizing. The stunner 

took immediate corrective action by using the captive boll 

and delivering a second stun with the captive boltrendered 

the market hog insensible. Mr. Douglas Stover, Plant 

Owner, was notified of the Noncompliance and the 

Establishment's failure to adhere to the regulatory 

requirements of9 CFR 313.15(a)(1). Mr. Stover has been 

notified that this noncompliance record has been closed. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 71 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M9442+P944 Groff Meats Inc. {1 DB223C3-2C7 UTC0909 03/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1, 313.2 HATS Category IV- Ante-mortem Inspection foday, OPEN 

2 8-47C6-8ESC-BC 035824N Humane Handling Monday, March 22, 2021 at approximately 0717 hrs, while 

128390F518} -1 (b) (6) wa.s observing pigs being 

moved into the stunnin.q area he observed the following 

noncompliance. (b) (6) observed an 

employee climb up the holding pen rails to gelbehlnd and 

past pigs In order to bring them into the stunning area. 

While the employee was moving across the rails a hog 

jumped up at him at which time the employee kic~ed the 

pig in the head/neck area to get itdown. No retain tag was 

applied as immediate corrective actions were implemented. 

Mr, John Groff, Plant Owner, was notified ofthe 

noncompliance and spoke to the employee emphasizing 

the importance ofproper handling of the animals, The plant 

isnot complying with 9CFR313.1 & 313.2. 

M9520+P952 Leidys, Inc. {507C0FF3--SCB4 UGA1605 01/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS Category IV Ante-Mortem lnspectionHats Category CLOSED 

0 -4D09-A3EF-3E0 014608N Humane Handling Ill Waler and Feed AvailabilityOn 1/8/21 at approximately 

1DSBF6A85J 0440 hrs. while performing humane handling activities 

(ante-mortem Tnspectron) atEst. 9520, I (b) (6) 

observed the following noncompliance. The 

Eslabli,shmenthad partoflot#500 in the back hallway 

approximately 35 hogs. ,I observed that the water trough for 

this area had no water in it. Employee immediately Wmed 

on the water and filled the trough so no regulatory control 

action was taken.(b) (6) was informed ofthis noncompliance and failure 

to rn_eet 9CFR 313.2(e). 

-1 

M9548+P954 Wayne {4803F641-50C7 ODJ4113 01/19/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1) HATS Cateqory VIII Stunninq Effectiveness On January CLOSED 

8 Nell &Sons -4CED-A2C7-B3 010519N Humane Handling 19, 2020. {b) (6) observed a mis-stun ofa 

Meats Inc. 0C8804A3ES} -1 bull in the stun box atWayne Nell & Sons Meats M9548, 

white observing stunning effectiveness, at approximately 

02:00PM. The bull was standing freely inside the stun box. 

An Establishment employee made the first stun attempt with 

a handheld c::aplive bolt The employee ,lifted the chute and 

as the .bull was coming au\ the bull stood up. The fout 

USDA inspection employees standing on the slaughter 

floor exited immediately. One ofthe employees went and 

quickly retrieved the .45mm pistol and shot the bull again. 

At this point the bull was rendered unconscious so the 

employees attached the bull to the chain, hoisted itup, and 

began to bleed it out. While the bull was hanging from 

chain its eyes began to blink. The employee quickly 

grabbed the captive bolt and stunned !he bull again, No 

regulatory control action was taken. as the establishment 

employee took immediate corrective actions. Upon 

postmortem, (b) (6) observed three holes in the the 

skull. Shane Nell, Establishment owner, was informed of 

this non-compliance with 9 CFR 313.15(a)(1). This NR is 

linked to NR: ODJ1013114605N 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 72 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M9958 Jamison PaGl<lng {072A1C8B-3F3 

9"4965-9DB8-A4 

43E96B789E} 

SSA3007 

030209N 

-1 

03/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category VIII -Stunning Effectiveness. On March 

9th, 2021, at 8:05am, while observino stunning 

effectiveness for the HATS task, /bl 16l attempted to stun a 

steer in the stunning pen with a captive boltgun. I heard 

the captive boltfire and saw that the animal was still 

standing. (tJl (Gl took the backup captive boltgun and made 

a second stunning attempt. The steer immediately dropped 

on the second attempt and was rendered unconscious. 

Two holes in the skull were observed - one small hole atthe 

CLOSED 

midline and ·one larger hole about 1.5 inches to the right of 

midline. The hole on the midline did notfully penetrate the 

skun. Both (b) (6} and ibl (

61 were verbally informed 

of this noncompliance and it was presented in writing as 

well. There are no previous humane handling 

noncompliances in the past several months. This is a 

noncompliant with 9 CFR313.15(a)(1). 

M20760 USAPork 

Packers Inc 

{89B1 DSC2-697F 

-482A-912B-SBA 

F95BAE318} 

YKM181 

2025218 

N-1 

02118/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandlin_g 

313.30(a)(1). 

313.30(b)(3) 

Category VIII - Stunning Effectiveness 

(}2/18/20211240 hours. On Thursday 

February 18, 2021 approximate!y at1240 hours when I 

CLOSED 

was at the slaughter floor observing lhe. stunning procedure 

I saw the following noncompliance: I saw the stunning 

employee.stunning a market hog approximately 270 Lb. 

tnsidethe stunnlng chute and after he applied the electric 

current on the hog head and thorax I notked thatthe hog 

was notrendered unconsdous by vocalizing loudly and 

breathing regularly, the hog was not rendered unconscious 

after applylng the first stun. I saw the. stunning employee 

performing an immediate corrective action by app!Ying a 

secondhead stun while thehog was still inside the stunning 

chute which was effective and rendered the hog 

unconscious. I inforrned (b) (6) 

with the noncompliance. The plant was not compliant with 9 

CFR 313.30 (a)(1). and 9 CFR 313.30 (b)(31 

M562 JBS Green Bay, 

Inc. 

(6F09DC92-B645 

-4438-B1ED-7C6 

F05A11238} 

QSM191 

4013304 

N,1 

01/04/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

3 13.2 On 01/04/2021 at 0614 hours while performing Handling 

During Ante-mortem Inspection (HATS category IV) and 

Water and Feed Availability (HATS category Ill), it was 

observed that pen 45 had no water available as the water 

tank was empty and dry. Eight tattle had been held in the 

pen ovemighl U.S. Reject tag# B37033401 was applied to 

pen 45. The animals were moved and followed by IPP to 

the new pen with water. The·anima)s were notdehydrated 

and did not immediately drink from thetank in the new pen. 

(b) (6) , was notified o'f the 

noncomp'liance and was advised that cattle were not to be 

held in pen 45 until water was available. After assuring the 

tank was turned on and filled adequately with water, the 

U.S. reject taq was removed. (b) {6} 

was notified ofthe 

CLOSED 

noncompliance with regulation 9 CFR 3132 (e) and that a 

noncompliance record would be issued" 
,

Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 73 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

MS62M JBS Plainwell, {98EE31AC-0CF CFQ0214 03/26/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) At approximately 2:35PM, Friday. March 26th, 2021, ,,,rn► OPEN 

Inc. D-43BD-8F2D-7 032826N Humane Handling was observing (b) (6) 

B255482B39C} -1 knocking cattle at the knock box.(b} (6) 

lined up a shot on a Holstein animal and fired the 

pneumatic bolt gun.{b) (6) could observe the 

animal still holding its head upright. so he moved closer to 

observe the animal and could see it still had its eyes open. 

ears up, head upright and was moving it's head freely yet 

clamly from one side of the restraintto the other. 

Furthermore,(b) (6} could see a hole in the 

animal's head where the pneumatic boltgun hit'"''"' 

immediately grabbed the handheld stunner, 

howeverthe gun did not fire when he lined up a shot. He 

quickly reloaded the gun, lined up the Qun and fired which 

rendered the animal unconscious.(b} (6) 'informed 

{b) (6) of the issuance of a 

NR.The requirements of9CFR 313.1S(a)(1) were not 

met.HATS Category VIII. 

M952 BEF Foods, Jnc. {17358C76-8FD3 

-4AEB-92F7-21B 

987DF962C} 

YUC:4508 

021802N 

- 1 

02/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.2 HATS Category IV-Handnng During Ante Mortem 

lnspectionAt approximately 0845 hours. I went down to the 

barn to perform an ante-mortem check on a load ofpigs, 

Upon entering the barn, I heard vocalization ofmultiple 

animals. The round pen prior to the chute leading to the 

stunning area was overloaded with pigs, such that all pigs 

were piled on top of each oth_er and three of the p1gs were 

easily visible over the approximately five-foot-high sides of 

the pen and the animals were vocalizing. Uponfurther 

investigation,the gate separating the round pen and the 

chute was open and the animals being driven to the 

stunning area had backed out of the chute and crowded 

Into the round pen. After I got their attention. the animal 

handlers were able to get some of thepigs up the chute 

again and opened the back gate to the round pen to allow 

some pfgs out. None ofthe animals appeared to be 

tnjured, but the vocalization did not stop until all animals 

had all feet on the ground. This is in violation ofregulation 

9 CFR 3132 (a) "Driving of livestock from the unloading 

ramps to the holding pens and the holding pens to the 

stunntng area shall be done with a minimum of excitement 

and discomfort to the animals." I notifie~{b) (6) 

, and Plant Manager, Paul 

Monahan of this non-compliance. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 74 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M1816+V181 

6 

West Michigan 

BeefCo, LLC 

{SCSE498D-44D 

C-4A23--8780--D 

C64802732DB} 

TMB3208 

025609N 

--1 

02/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 On February 9, 2021 at approxirnately 9i 13am. I, (b) (6) 

was in the barn performing a humane 

handling task. White verifyinq HATS activity calegory Ill, 

Water and Feed availability, (b) (6) observed that the 

water in the ·ou(side pen' s automatic water container was 

frozen solid. Atthe time, there were 17 head of Holstem 

and mixed breed cat~e in the pen and the temperature was 

10 degrees Fahrenheit. This is noncomplianl with 9 CFR 

313,2(e) which slates that animals shall have access to 

watetat all times in holding pens. The (b) (6) was notified ofthis 

noncompliance. In response. cattle were moved out of this 

pen and into a pen with access to water. 

CLOSED 

M10038+P10 

038+V10038 

Scotts 

Hook & Cleaver 

Inc. 

{8E46558E--85FF 

--403B--BBDD--2A 

A 1526AD288} 

RSH5713 

074804N 

--1 

01/04/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS CATEGORY Ill- WATER AND FEED 

AVAILABIUTYOn 1/4/2021 while verifying the humane 

treatmentoflivestock, I found Humane Slaughter of 

Livestock- Handling of Uvestock noncompliance. At 

approximately 1410 hour while verifying livestock access to 

water, I found six beef cattJe in pen 3. Normally water is 

provided to the livestock In pens 3 and 4 by a shared 

automatic: watering trough. However, both sides ofthe 

automatic watertrough shared by pens 3 and 4 were filled 

with a soltd block ofIce. Moreover, there was no other 

source of drinking water provided to the cattle in pen 3, 

besides what was supposed to be provided by the 

automatic watering trough. This finding illustrates 

noncompliance with 9 CFR 313.2 (e), because animal in a 

holding pen did not have access to Water.I fmmediately 

notified (b) (6) of thatthe above-described finding 

would be documented on a noncompliance record. In 

response, (b) ( 6) promptly removed the icefrom the 

automatic watertrough. This allowed the trough to fill 

automatically with water. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 75 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M21156+P21 

156 

Den's Counuy 

Meats, Inc. 

{981CAB14-C2A 

0--48A1-9228--8D 

312B8013BD} 

FFH5313 

032317N 

-1 

03/17/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313. 16(a)(1), 

313.16(b)(1) 

(iii) 

HATS Category VIII-Srunning EffectivenessAt 

approximately 0850 hours, while observinQ HATS Category 

VIII-Stunninq Effectiveness, (b) (6) 

, and (b) (6) 

. observed the following 

noncompliance: An establishment employee attempted to 

stun a beet cow in the restrainer, with no head catch, with 

a firearm. The firearm was heard to discharge atthe same 

time the animal moved its head slighlJy. The cow was still 

conscious as itremained standing and moved its head in a 

controlled manneraway from the employee. The 

establishment employee immediately and effectively 

stunned the animal with the same firearm and the animat 

CLOSED 

dropped from a standing position. The establishment 

employee performed a security stun on the unconscious 

animal with the same firearm. The skinned head was 

observed and there were two overlapping holes present 

approximately three inches above the half-way point 

between the medial canthus ofthe eyes. A third hole was 

present approximately one inch above and to the right of 

the other holes. A metal wire was used to follow the path of 

the holes and all three holes entered the brain cavity with 

the third hole on the upper edge ofthe cavity. I notified 

Mr. Dennis Schaardt, Establishment Owner, of the 

forthcoming noncompliance and the failure to the meet the 

regulatory requirements of 9 CFR313.16(a)(1) and 

313.16(b)(1)(iii). We discussed preventative measures 

during the down time between the arrival of the next animal 

and prior to additional stunning attempts. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 76 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M21069 Premium Iowa {9FB98DBS-79B8 CME251 03/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) At approximately 7:30 am While verifying HATS Category CLOSED 

Pork, LLC -4E8C-8947-909 5031008 Humane Handling VIII - Stunning Effectiveness, I observed the followrng 

57C460257} N-1 noncompliance: While observing the stunning of slow hogs 

with a hand-held captive boll device, one hog was not 

immediately rendered unconscious with the first stun. Two 

establishment employees werepresent. Restraint was by 

one employee standing in front of the hog and the other 

pressing into the hog's side with his legs. The hog was dog 

sitting btJl still moving. When the employee attempted to 

stun the market hog with the hand-held captive bolt device, 

I heard a pop sound as the device went off. When the 

hand-held captive boll gun discharged the hog's head 

dropped and he went down. The barn employee and I 

observed the hog rapidly blinking. The assisting barn 

employee observed the hog tracking the employee with the 

stun gun. which I could not see since he had stepped into 

my line ofsight. signaling a conscious hog. The assisting 

employee told him to immediately reload the hand-held 

captive bolt device to restun the hog. The hog was 

immediately and effectivety stunned on the second attempt 

and unconsciousness was verified. I immediately notified 

(b) (6) , and (b) (6) 

• of the noncompliance with stunning 

and verbally requested that all stunn'ing be discontinued. 

(b) (6) instructed employees to stop loading hogs into 

the (b) (4) system. The ineffectively stunned hog was 

allowed to be processed and was railed oulat the head 

inspection. (b) (6) , and I examined the head. Both bolt wound 

angles were followed and had penetrated the bone of the 

skull. One bolt wound was approximately one inch above 

the medial canthus ofthe eyes on the midline. l'he other 

boll wound was approximately three-fourths ofan inch 

above the medial canthus of the eves and one auarter of 

an inch offthe midlineKb)(6) janct"b)(6) I 

provided verbal preven1auve measures .ano I veroa11y 

removed the regulatory control action and allowed stunning 

to continue. This is a noncompliance with regulation 9CFR 

313.1S(a)(1) for notproducing immediate 

unconsciousness and 9CFR 313.1 S(b)(1 )(iii} tor improper 

restraint. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 77 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M21585+P21 

58S+V21585 

Kiowa Locker 

System. LLC 

{E4DA4FEF-7BB 

4-459A-875F-732 

AD1C21CC6} 

WDD271 

0011423 

N-1 

01/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 On 01/23/21, approximately 0600 hours, while doing 

antemortem inspection was noticed that 7 heads of'beef 

were held in the alley way. They were unloaded the day 

before slaughter. These animals have a bucket ofwater at 

the end of the alley. Where only the animal in front have 

access to il These animals do.not have space either to 

move back/forward norto lie down overnight Empl·oyee 

was notified about this noncompliance and some of the 

animals were moved into a holding pen while the rest were 

waited untitslaughler slarted to be moved in. These 

findings donot meetregulatory requirements of 9CFR 

313.2(e) Animals shall have acc;ess to water...there shall 

be sufficient room in the holding pen for animals held 

overnight to lie down. Plant owner was notified about this 

noncompliance verbally and also in writing with the 

issuance of this noncompliance record. 

CLOSED 

M21595+P21 

595 

Mayar's Halal 

Meat Processing 

{DBAF94M-2CE 

B-41BE-9AB0-9F 

A93685BF86} 

KPD3818 

020301N 

-1 

02/01/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.2 While Inspecting on the kill floor I (b) (6) ) was 

standfng between the two kilt boxes and looked into the 

sheep/goat kill box I saw the following noncomplfance. One 

anfmal was hosted up by his hind leg with his front two feet 

touching the ground. The butcherwhowas assigned to do 

the killing was not atthe kill box. I called over Mr. Schawali 

Mayar and shown him the animal, tnfonn1ng. him -ofthe 

estabilshrnents failure to meet regulation 9 CFR 

313.2 . Corrective action was taken right away, and the 

animal was lowered so all four feet were on the ground. 

CLOSED 

M21595+P21 

595 

Mayar's Halal 

MeatProcessing 

{A2035750'40B6-

497 4,8FB9-873A 

FC4456D0} 

KPQ3110 

031230N 

-1 

03/29/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 On March 29, 2021 at approximately 0815 hours as the 

(b) (6) ,was walking through the 

parking lot atthe establishment to begin a verification plari 

visit. the EIAO observed establishment.employees movrng 

animals from the pasll,Jre to the holding pens. As 

approximately 10 ariimals, sheep and goats, were traveling 

down the corridor an establishment employee was 

attempting to stop the animals from going straight through 

the end gate and trying to getthem to tum and go inlo a 

holding pen. Approximately five animals went straight by 

OPEN 

the employee despite his attempts to tum/block them. The 

sixth animal, a goat. attempted to go straight with the 

previous animals when the employee raised his leg and 

extended it in a kicking fashion and made contact with the 

goat causing the animal to roll and flip backwards. After 

discussion with Alameda District Office management, 

reject tag #B41802235 was placed on lhe knock box. The 

EIAO notified SchwaH Mayar, plant manager, ofthe 

incident and informed him that heneeded to submi\ 

corrective actions and preventive measures. This 

represents noncompliance with 9 CFR 313.2{a). Failur!'! to 

comply with 9 CFR may result in further administrative or 

regulatory actions. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 78 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M21700 Island Grown {08F99188-9D45 OXL0517 02/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) Atapproximately 9; 15 am on 02/08/21 while observing OPEN 

Fa.rmers -48FC-9E47-CD4 020009N Humane Handling stunning of a heifer with a 22mag Rugerrifle, I C'' ' 

Cooperative 7D1B0F518} -1 observed the following noncompliance. An 

establishment employee was attempting to stun an animal 

which was loaded in a gooseneck cattle trail'er standing 

facing the back end of the cattle trailer. I observed the first 

stun attempt contact the head ofthe animal. The animal 

remained standing and did not visibl'y reactto stun attempt 

orVisibly vocalize. The stun operator immediately armed 

the rifle again and promptly delivered a second stun 

attempL The second stun attempt rendered the animal 

immediately insensible and the animal dropped down to the 

trailer floor. A third security stun was then applied with the 

handheld captive boll device (HHCBD). and I then verified 

that the animal was notdisplaying any signs of 

consciousness. I (b) (6) promptly informed 

(b) (6) , ofthe noncompliance and regulatory action was taken. I attached US 

Retain tag# B42117571 to the trailer door and then I 

contacted (b) (6) on 

howto proceed. (b) (6) allowed 

establishment lo finish processing the carcass and 

establishment elected to cease operations for the day to 

provide a corrective action and preventive measures. The 

Denver District Office was contacted through supervisory 

channels. Upon review of the dressed head, I observed 

three stun holes had penetrated the skull. There have been 

no non-compliance records i•ssued forthe same rootcause 

with in the past 90 days. 

M22095+P22 Creston Valley {9ACC02DS-C4C Q011813 03123/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 On March 23. 2021, at approximately 0745 hours, I, CLOSED 

095+V22095 Meats 0-456A-9D45-0E 034523N HumaneHandling (b) (8) . observed 2 

24EDD1ABE9} -1 beef steers to be slaughtered underFederal lnspectfon. 

which was indicated by (b) (6) 

durin.9 direct observation of anternortem 

tnspection, slipping in the large holding pen. Both steers 

were observed walking at a normal pace slipping onto their 

front knees on multiple occasions during antemortem 

inspection. Inside the holding pen it was observed·to have 

a heavy buildup ofwater and mud/feces puddles in multiple 

areas ofthe large holding pen causing the 2 steers to sltp 

and loose their footing while walking. It was discussed with 

{b) (6) per9CFR313.1(b) 

the livestock pens shall be maintained in a Way to provide 

adequate footing for the livestock. I informed (b) (6) 

ofthe noncompliance and verbally stated I would be 

documenting mv findin_gs. At approximately 0835 rt was 

observed(b ) (6) moved the 2 steers into a smaller 

holding pen to provide the steers with better footi'ng and no 

more slipplng. Plant Owner Simon Caleb was also informed 

ofthe noncompliance. I reviewed the previous 90 days and 

found none with like orsimilarcause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 79 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M21265+P21 

265+V21265 

Smucker's Meats {855B5232-C35F 

-4B40-A46E-4C4 

CDD7'331AS} 

RYl2910 

012021N 

-1 

01/21/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) HATCategory VIII Stunning Effectiveness (9 CFR 

313.1 S)On January 21 , 2021, at Establishment M-21265, 

Smucker's Meat. at 0950 hours, (b) (6) 

observed the following noncompliance while covetfng 

slaughter duties. The establishment moved a beefsteer into 

the stun box for stunning witl, a hand- held captive boll 

The steer was standing freely in the stun box. The stunner 

made the firs! stunning attempt with the captive bolt, then 

the captive bolt fell from the employee's hand onto the 

ground in-front ofthe stun box. The steer then began to 

voca.lize loudly. It could not be determined if the steer fell 

or was still standing due to the solid stun box. The stunner 

took corrective action by immediately picking up the 

captive bolt, he reloaded it, and delivered a second stun 

which made the steer insensible. Examination ofthe skuU 

CLOSED 

revealed two full-thickness holes in the forehead ofthe 

animal, one in the center oftheforehead, and one 

approximately 2 inches off center toward the right eye. 

This observation combined with what was heard after the 

first short, confirmed that the first stunning attempt did not 

render the steer immediately unconscious. (b) (6) was notified ofnonc ompliance with 9 CFR 

313.15.(a) (1 ). 

M33845+V33 

845 

Moonlight Meat 

Processing Inc 

{78F7 AB96-F249 

-418F-85F4-21D 

62D7A3E33} 

PPQ2008 

010515N 

• 1 

01/15/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.16fa)(1), 

313.16(a)(3) 

On 01/15!2021 at approximately 09:05 am at Moonlight 

Meat Processing while Performing Livestock Humane 

Handling Task Stunning Effectiveness verification. [J'.>Ht 

observed a stunning failure. A Steer was 

driven into the knockbox, and restrained With the he.ad 

catch. An initial stun attempt with a .41 Orifle was made and 

was irieffective, as theanimal remained standing and 

looking around. The stun operator rendered an fmmediate 

and effective corrective action utilizing the same.stunnfng 

apparatus, which rendered the steer fnsensible to pain. 

and it remained so thereafter. Plant Manager Jason Griffin 

was notified of the Non-Compliance and US Reject Tag #8 

31 985696 was applfed to the Kill Chute. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 80 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M33916+P33 

916 

Lons Cold 

Storage and 

Retail 

{C2200181-F033 

-4A2B-B8A6-SA9 

COOESD24E} 

BZI04140 

22718N1 

02/16/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 HATS Category IV,"Handling during Ante-Mortem 

Inspection": Pens, floors, and driveways, including 

entrances and exits, are to be maintained in good repair (9 

CFR 313.1).0n February 13. 2021 at 7:31 A.M. (b) (6) 

doing an Odd - Hour Inspection observed in the 

antemortem pen #7 at the bottom ofthe metal siding there 

was some sharp edges exposed.(b) (6) emailed 

me on February 15. 2021 and told me to write a 

noncompliance on his finding and discuss the finding with 

the management. l was'infonned by Mr. Tim Rogers that 

he had already tagged the pen notto be used. I verified 

thatthe dale on the plant tag was fn fact 1/15/2021. I 

contacted Mr. Tim Rogers, plant manager, and told him of 

the noncompl[ance and gave him a copy of the Odd Hour 

Inspection Report Mr. Tim Rogers said he wouldhave the 

pen repaired over the weekend. 9CFR 313.1 states that 

Livestock pens, driveway-s, and ramps shall be maintained 

in good repair. They shall be free from sharp or protruding 

objects which may, in the opinion ofthe inspector, cause 

injury or pain to the animals. Loose boards splintered or 

broken planking, and unnecessary openings where the 

head. feet, orlegs ofan animal may be•Injured shall be 

repaired. 

CLOSED 

M33940 Fauquier's Finest 

Custom Meat 

Processing, Inc. 

{FAAA76CF-DOD 

F-4E94--AE23-9A 

CEOAOFE19A} 

DAG300 

5012004 

N-1 

01/04/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On 01/04/2021 around 06:00 am, while performing 

Humane Handling Review and Observation . I, (b) (6) 

found wire is sticking out inside three pens from 

the left side ; pens # 1 , 2 and 5. J told ibl 151 about the 

lower part of sticking wlre at these three pens which could 

hurt the animals . I notified (b) (6) 

about the non-compliance. thts 

noncompliance with313.1: Livestock pens, driveways and 

ramps. 

CLOSED 

M34265 Naturally New 

Mexico Food 

Products LLC 

{80490561-141f . 

49BE-ADE4-1 EE 

7A6D2DC3D} 

TJS3415 

023824N 

-1 

02/24/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 At approximately 1037 hours while performint] an ante 

mortem inspection on a suspect animal. (b) (6) and I, 

(b) (6) , observed the following noncompliance iii 

the livestock pens:Nowater was available to the livestock in 

the pens that were visited. The establishment failed to meet 

the requlato,y requirements of9 CFR 313.2(e).(b) (6) 

was notified ofthis noncompliance verbally. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 81 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M34360+P34 

360 

House ofHalal 

Meat. Inc 

fF990D203-7770-

4881-8CD3,SB1 

9489103F3} 

VUA4309 

021223N 

-1 

02/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 al approximately 9:55 

AM.(b) (6) obseived the following 

non-compliance while doing a routine humane handling 

task:A) In sheltered pen number 3, I observed a metal 

gate with corrosion to a degree that exposed sharp metal 

protrusions with the potential ofcausing harm to an 

animal pressing against same. Most ofthe 

non.-compliance protrusions were located on the cross 

bars that crossed diagonally across the gate.Additionally, a 

second gate'in (he same pen, showed similardegree of 

deterioration.Retained Tag number 839 530208 was 

applied to the pen. This non-compliance was bought to the 

attention of Lyle lqbad, the manager on duty.The Plant1s 

being adv.ised thatfurther disciplinary or,regulatory 

measures maybe taken in the absence ofappropriate 

corrective actions. 

OPEN 

M34360+P34 

360 

House of Halal 

Meat. Inc 

{22E797E4-AC27 

-4EEE-8982-A67 

C340868A2} 

VUA0014 

035026N 

-1 

03/26/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.2 On Friday, 3/26/21 at approximately 10:30 A.M whfle 

performing a routine humane handling task, I, (b) (6) 

observed the following non-compliance:* A holding 

pen with approximately 7 (seven) cows being held wlthout 

water. Mr. Mohammad lqbad, the owner of the Plant was 

immediately notified. Mr. lqbad immediately repaired the 

water hose problem and refilled the empty water container 

with fresh water.(b) (6) the previous day notified the 

Plant that the water container was lowin water.The Plant is 

OPEN 

notified that without appropriate corredlve action, further 

measures will be taken by the.Agency to remedy the 

non-compliance. 

M34449+P34 

449+V34449 

Texas Natural 

Meats 

{86AD1217-7551 

-4972-A753-182F 

328D8796} 

NMV071 

4032326 

N-1 

03/26/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 HATS Category IV Inspection HandlingAtapproximately 

0703 hours while conducting Antemortem activities ih the 

catwalkof the pens and prior to the start ofthe kill, the 

following noncompliance was observed: One wild hog 

among approximately 15 waiting to be slaughter and 

located in the a'lleyway next to the doorchute maneuvered 

loescape free thru one of the open spaces ofthe alleyway 

wall to the bad entrance of the kill floor and where both 

inspection personnel and establishment personnel use on a 

constant basis. This small wild hog jumped to the back 

door three to four times trying to find a way to escape. The 

hog did not seem to be injured. The heightof the alleyway 

is approximately 15 feel tall from the entrance floor and 

there is a gap of approximately 7.5 inches between each 

post. There are total of4 open spaces in between each 

post. The hogs were already agitated and stressed out as 

they were tryinq to find a way to escape, both (b) (6) 

and I ( b) ( 6) were able to walk back thru the catwalk to 

the other back entrance of the kill floor and alert(b) (6) 

• Approximately 10 minutes 

later and with inspection personnel present(b) (6) was ableto render the hog unconscious humanely by 

applying a single gunshot. I notified (b) (6) and Ms. 

Herzog (PlantManager) of this noncompliance. 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 82 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M34729 White Oak 

Pastures 

{381C8A69-A63F 

-47FA-85ES-AS2 

EBB483668} 

ZME2510 

015308N 

-1 

01/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.30(a)(1), 

373.30(a)(3), 

313.30(b)(2), 

313.30(b)(3) 

On Friday, January 8th, 2020 at approximately 8:08AM at 

White Oak Pastures Establishment 34729, IPP observed a 

humane handling non-compliance during routine slaughter 

of swine. The second hog of the group was moved into the 

stunning area. The pig fell to the floor, lay in lateral 

recumbency, had rhythmic breathing, and vocalized with 

the first electric shock. The employee immediately 

attempted to render the pig unconscious a second time 

with the electricily. The pig remained in lateral recumbency 

and vocalized again, The employee took immediate 

corrective actions by retrieving theirsecondary method of 

stunning, the captive bolt, and rendered the pig 

uncbnscious with the first blow. Rejecttag #839288777 

was placed on the stunning area and slaughter was halted. 

This non-compliance violates regulations 313.30 (a) (1), 

(a) (3), (b) (2), and (b) (3). The plant's corrective actions 

including reassess mg the electricily box and increasing the 

gain from 1-2 to 7, having the captive boltreadily 

accessible and close to the stunning area, and retraining 

the employee. 

CLOSED 

M34799 Braggs Corner 

Meat Corp, 

(F3425FF3-FE80 

-45B3-8488-F65 

85BE0E106} 

PCJ2411 

013314N 

-1 

01/13/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.1 ,'313.2 On 1/14/21. at approximately 0B:30am, t,(b) (6) 

and (b) (6) , whileperformingan 

Odd-Hour Inspection ofEstablishment Humane Handling 

task at Braggs Halal (M34799), obse1ved the followrng 

noncompliance: AnTmals, too numerous to count (>20 

lamb), had no access to water. The outside enclosure 

where animals were present contained too numerous to 

count(>20) protruding, sharp nails thatcould cause injury 

to the animals. Protruding nails corltaintng clumps of 

animal hair were on the hay container. Other nails were 

protruding from loose boards (2x4 remnants) on the ground 

at various places in the endo.sure. These protrudfng nails 

were partlally obstructed by vegetation increasing the 

likelihood for anTmal injury. More than 10 nails were 

protruding from a piece ofold plywood and one lamb was 

observed resting on this. sheet of ptywood. (b) (6) 

called plantmanager, Mr. Ammar Mian, and notified hTm of 

these findings ofnoncompliance and forthcoming 

noncompliance. record. We waited for a worker to provide 

the animals with water. The animals were. tlieh moved from 

the cun-ent enclosure to an enclosure without protruding 

nafls. These findings represent non-compliance with CFR 

313.2(e) and 313.1 (a). 

CtOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 83 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M39968+P39 Donald's Meat {5498709D-6B83 PIF4709 01/07/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) At approximately 10:30am while performing HATS category CLOSED 

968 Processing, LLC -4308-92CC-717 014807N Humane Handling #8, Sunning effectiveness . of a Humane Handling Task in 

E258619E2} -1 the stunninQ are I observed the following Non-compliance: 

(b) (6) took a shot with a .22 

Magnum rifle to stun a Market hog. The hog appeared 

properly stunned so he opened the knock box and rolled it 

out onto the bleeding area floof. (b) (6) grabbed the 

animal by the earand attempted to stick It, penetrating the 

skin approximately 1 inch with the tip ofthe knife. When 

penetration occurred the animal tried to right itself. 

(b) ( 6) tried to reposition to accomplish the sticking and 

the animal atthat time did riQht itselfinto a sternal position. 

At this point(b) (6) instructed 

(b) (6) to shotitagain.(b) (6) grabbed the rifle, 

chambered another round and immediately applied an 

effective stun. After the event occurred I applied Taq# B 

20 223667 lathe knock box and contacted (b) (6) 

for further instruction. (b) (6) said she would consult with 

(b) (6) . After consulting with (b) (6) 

and determining the incident to be non egregious ·, 

instructed me to remove the tag and write this 

Non-compliance Report. This is a Non-compliance under 

313.16(a)(1). (b) (6) was 

notified ofthis Non-compliance verbally and management 

in writing with this NR. No productwas affected. 

M39968+P39 Donald's Meat {D132DD06-4712 PIF5811 01/14/2021 04C02 Uvestock 313.16(a)(1) At approximately 11 :00am Wt,ile performing HATS category CLOSED 

968 Processing, LLC -4987-8156-193A 012714N Humane Handling #8. Stunning effectiveness, of a Humane Handling Task in 

BE6~0701} -1 the stunning area I observed the following Non-compliance; 

Employees were loading a steer with a high strung 

disposition into the knock box. After repeated efforts to get 

the animals head into the Hydraulic Head Catch kill floor 

(b) (6) decided to stun the animal 

without the Head Catch. Tony took the shot with a .40 

cal1ber pistol. The animal moved his head-at the last minute 

and the shot hit him approximately 1" down from the very 

Lop center of his head. The steer remained standing.Tony 

tmmediately shot again (semi automatic weapon) and 

applied an effective stun. After the event{)ccurred I 

applied Tag# B 20 472316 to the knock box and contacted 

{b) (6) for further instruction. {b} (6) said she 

would consult with (b) (6) .After consultin_g 

wlth (b) (6) and determining the Incident did notrequire 

suspension due to repetitive non-compliance or 

egregiousness (b) (6) instructed me.to remove the tag 

and write this Non-compliance Report.. This is a 

Non-compliance under 313.16(a)(1). (b) (6) 

was notl.fied of this Non-compliance verbally 

and management in writing with this Non-compliance 

Report. No product was affected. 
.

Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 84 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M40342+P40 The Ohio State {S073D6A-8881 RNXS610 03/11/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) On March 11, 2021 at approximately 0815hrs while OPEN 

342 University -46A6-9BBB-C9F 033829N Humane Handling perfom1ing a Livestock Humane Handling Review and 

0A6CC2A22} -1 Observation the following observation was made. The 

animal was in the cage to be stunned by captive bolt. 

Establishmentpersonnel attempted to stun the animal with 

!he cap.tive bolt and was not successful, the animal was 

moving and flarling about The establishment then attempted 

to stun the animal again with a different stunning bolt 

device and was also not successful, the animal was still 

moving and flailing. and vocalizing. The establishment then 

attempted to stun the animal again with the captive bolt 

again and was successful the animal was not vocalizing or 

moving. The establishment was immediately notified of the 

mentioned findings. This does notrepresent insanitary 

conditions orthe chance for productadultery. 

-

M40207+P40 Appalachian Ag, fCF49209C-CDE XUl1112 02/25/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 Upon entering the holdfng/pen area at 0832 I observed the CLOSED 

207+V40207 LLC 9-43C3-B68B--09 024925N Humane Handling following noncompliancecfr 313.2 (e). (b) (6) 

FAEF7BCESS} -1 was escorted by ownerJonathan Reinford of 

Establishment M40207 ofAppalachian Ag ·located in 

Prestonburg, Ky. I observed in the Swine holding/pen an 

empty bucket typevessel. I asked Mr. Reinford at what 

timethe SWine were delivered, he answered. "last night". I 

clarified. "overnrght?". Mr. Reinford stated. "Yes." Mr, 

Relnford explained that, that spedflc holding/pen liad water 

on this same morning and they, "tippedit", as. I could 

visually see a small narrow two foot stream ofwale~ at the 

outside ofthe swihe's holding area. Mr. Reinford called to 

his staffemployee to immediately fill theempty vessel, and 

rt was filled.Mr. Reinford was informed that a 

noncompliance w1ll be issued according toe-Category Ill 

ctr 313.2 (e) Water is to be available to livestock in all 

holding/pens at all times. 

M40244+P40 Gray's & Danny's {98C79230-4144- LCP3314 03/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 313-.1 At approximately 1430, while performing the livestock CLOSED 

244+V40244 Investment, Inc. 4952-A30F-6DE0 034502N Humane Handling Humane Handling task. the following noncompliance was 

E3SF8FB1} -1 observed: I observed plant personne[ back up the transport 

trailerto the door ofthe slaughter trailer where they bring 

in the animals onto the slaughterfloor. I noticed an 

approximately six-inch gap between .the floorofthe 

transport trailer and the slaughter floor..Wnile manually 

removing a goatfrom the traileronto the slaughterfloor, 

(b) (6) and I observed a goat slip through the gap with 

its front legs while plant personnel continued to try to pull 

the goatonto (he floor. Istopped the employee and .notified 

him that the goat's legs had fallen through the gap, and he 

lifted the goatonto the trailer after makinq sure the legs 

were no longer stuck. I then notified (b) (6} of the 

noncompliance. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 85 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M9398A Dixon Meats {68735155-2C1A 

-46FS-A825-9A1 

312B3A9B1} 

PWO091 

2015805 

N-1 

01/04/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(1) Hats Category VIII-Stunning Effectiveness On January 4, 

2021 at approximately 13:15 hours while performing 

Humane HandllnQ Verification activities atEstablishment 

M9398A, l(b) (6) . observed the following 

noncompliance. The establishment had a market swine in 

the stun box for stunning witl1 a hand-heldcaptive bolt.. The 

market swine was standing in the stun box as the stunner 

made the first attempt with the captive bolt. The captive boll 

failed to penetrate the swine's skull fully causing the swine 

to jump up and vocalize. No regulatory control action was 

taken as the stunner took immediate corrective action and 

delivered a succ:essful second stun. which made theswine 

unconscious and insensible. Mr. Mark Dixon was verbally 

informed of the noncompliance and the establishment's 

failure to adhere to the regulatory requirements of9 CFR 

313.15 (a)(1). 

OPEN 

M9398A Dixon Meats {723637E0°0003-

48D7-8BC2-3223 

34204C9F} 

PWO251 

1030626 

N-1 

03/25/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.1S(a)(1) HATS CATEGORY VIII: STUNNING EFFECTIVENESS On 

March 25th 2021 at approximately 08:20 hours whlle 

performtng the Livestock Humane Handltnq verification task 

at establishment M9398A, I, (b) ( 6) . observed the following noncomplfance: The estabffshment 

had a steer in the stun box for stunning wtth a hand-held 

captive bolt. The steer was in the head restralnt As the 

stunner made the first stun attempt withthe captive bolt. the 

steer moved its head, causing the captive bolt to not fully 

penetrate the ste.er's skull. Noregulatory control action was 

taken as the. stunner took immedfate corrective action and 

OPEN 

delivered a successful second stun which made the steer 

unconscious and Insensible. Mr. Mark Dixon. the 

establishment owner. :was verbally fnformed ofthe 

noncompliance and the establishment's fa11ure to adhere to 

the regulatory requirements of9 CFR 313.15 (a)(1). A 

past, stmnar noncompliance was. documented in NR# 

PWO0912015805N, dated 1/4/2021, when a similar issue 

arose while stunning a market swine. 

M1052 MSM Meal 

Company 

{35561AC8-C747 

--44F8-AA39--98C 

42868B4DA} 

VUV2114 

025822N 

-1 

02/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313. 16(a)(1) On Monday February 22nd, 2021 at approximately 9:45 

AM al MSM Establishment# M1052, IPP obseived a 

humane handling non-compliance during routine slaughter 

of swine. The employee responsible for stunning attempted 

to render 1 pig unconscious with a gunshot The pig was 

notrendered unconsc1ous and continued to stand, 

vocalize, and a small amount ofblood was noted. The 

employee immediately used ,the firearm to administer a 

second shotthat rendered the pig unconscious. Tag 

number#288782 was applied to the stunning area and 

slaughter was halted. Because plan! management took 

immediate corrective actions including immediately 

applying a second shot the pig's head, the tag was 

removed and slaughter resumed. This non.compliance 

violates regulation 313.16 (a) (1). Plant management was 

notified ofthis non-compliance both verbally and in writing. 

OLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 86 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M1052 MSM Meat fFF2ECB78-F677 VUV1515 03/04/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) On Thursday March 4, 2021 at approximately 9:45 AM at CLOSED 

Company 

M40147+P40 This Old Farm 

147+V40147 Meats and 

Processing 

M40157 Sylvester Quality 

Meats 

-4679-B 18B-08.7 

6FA801241} 

{A0DD56AD-C72 

A-4E1A-943A-82 

43901713D2} 

{7F52COD2-CSF 

4-4744-94AS-SFF 

43C82630F} 

032004N 

-1 

LDY3206 

020224N 

-1 

XNA0608 

020011N 

• 1 

02/23/2021 

02/08/2021 

04C02 

04C02 

Humane Handling 

Livestock 

Humane Handling 

Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 

313 .2 

MSM Establishment# M1052, IPP observed a humane 

handling non-compliance during routine slaughter of cattle. 

The employee responsible for stunning attempted lo render 

1 steer unconscious with a grmshot The steer was not 

rendered unconscious and continued lo stand. and a small 

amount ofblood was noted. The antmal did not voc;alize. 

The employee immediately used the firearm to administer a 

second shotthat rendered the steerunconscious. Tag 

number#B3928!i783 was appliedto the stunning area and 

slaughter was halted. On postmortem inspection the 

skinned head was examined, and two distinctpoints of 

entry were iden6fied. This non-compliance violates 

regulation 313.16 (a) (1). Plant management was notified 

of this non-compliance both verbally and in writing. 

VII. Slips and Falls (9 CFR 313.7 and 313.2): On OPEN 

February 23, 2021. the followlng non-compliancewas 

observed.(b ) (6} was performing a Humane Handling 

Verification task by watching establishment personnel 

bringing in cattle into the establishment's holding pen's. As 

one ofcattle were walking. around inholding pen 3, 

the steer's feet and hind legs had slipped from underneath 

causing the animal to fall onto the cement fioor. The area 

wherethe anlmal fell did not have slip resistant mats. After 

the animal got back up.(b) (6) was discussing with 

the establishment's employ·ee abollt the fall, and the 

livestock slipping and fall hazards. While speaking to the 

establishment's employee, (b) {6) observed 

another beef slip in the same holding pen.There were 

pieces of mats ln pen 3 blJt notcovering the entirety ofthe 

cement floor. (b) ( 6) spoke to owner Jessica Roosa 

about the above observations. and the [nadequate footing 

and the lack of slfp resistant flooring inthe llvestock holding 

pens. The establishments corrective acfion was to put 

another matin pen 3. OwnerJessica Roosa was verbally 

notified that they would be receivihg a non-compliance. 

That these observations are noncompliant wfth the 

regulatory requirements of9 CFR 313.1 (b) and 313.2(a). 

At approximately 1415 hours on 02/08121. (b) (6) OPEN 

during plantvisit.at slaughter operation hours ofSylvester 

Quality Meats. {b) (6) observed noncompliance in 

the pens of regulation 313.2(e) Handling of Livestock. 

Which states animals shall have access to water in au 

holding pens and ifheld longer than 24 hours, access to 

feed. Noncompliance#l ,Pen 3 upon observation livestock 

had no water. Noncompliance#2- Pen 2 upon observation 

water provided for livestock was frozen fn the trough. 

Establishment personal was verbally notified for failing to 

meet regulatory requirements ofregulation 9CFR part 

€313.2(e). Plant personal immediately relocated the 

livestock to a different pen that-did have an adequate water 

supply to restore humane handling of livestock. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday. April 5, 2021 87 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M44824+V44 Western Meat {263D9885~21E3 XTB1215 03/01/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) On Mondav March 1. 2021, at approximately 0946 hours, I, CLOSED 

824 Processing, Inc. -4ECS-ABEQ.-148 032301N Humane Handling (b) (6) . obseNed the following 

SA6886360} -1 humane handling non-compliance. At approximately 0946 

hours, while standing by .the knock box performing HATS 

category VIII (Stunning Effectiveness), 1 obseNed a plant 

employee ineffectively stun a dairy cow in theknock box. 

The plant employee applied and discharged the captive bolt 

gun low on the forehead of the dairy cow. The dairy cow 

remained standing, shook herhead slightly, and then 

turned her head to look at.the plantemp'loyee and me. The 

plantemployee immediately g,rabbed a loaded back-up 

captive bolt gun and applied an effectivesecond stun to the 

back of the cow's poll. The dairy cow immediately 

collapsed in the knock box and was unconscious. I applied 

U.S. Reject Tag# 845402846 to the knock box to slop all 

further stunning. I informed Plant Manger Fidel Ibarra of 

the ineffective stun and that I tagged the knock box. I also 

informed him ofthe forthcoming non,.compliance. I then 

wentto the slaughterfloor and obseNed the skinned head 

of the dairy cow that had been ineffectively stunned and 

confirmed that the knock hole on the forehead was too 

low. The knock hole was at the levet ofthe lateral canthus 

of both eyes. Captive bolt stunners must be applied to 

produce immediate unconsciousness. This is a 

non-compliance ofthe regulatory requirements of 9 CFR 

313.15(a)(1). 

M44910+P44 Abattoir {5D83A042-E3C JCH0912 01/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.16(a)(1) HATS Category VIII-Stunning Effectiveness On22, OLOSED 

910+V44910 Assocfates Inc. 9-4ESC-A 1 EA-16 012422N Humane. Handlin_g January 2021. at approximately 0810 hours, at 

BA43A82ASF} -1 establishment 44910, the slaughter inspector observed and 

reported thefollowing humane handling stunning 

effectiveness noncompliance. The.establishment moved a 

bovine steer into the stuhning chute for stunning with a .22 

magnum caliber rifle. TheSteer was standing freely in the 

stunnfng chute, not in the head restraint. The stunning 

attempt hitthe head as evldence by both the steerfalllng to 

a s fttir,g position, voc.alfz1ng once, and tryfng to regain 

footage to. stand. The stunner took immediate corrective 

action b,Y using the back-up captive bolt and delivering the 

second stun, which rendered the steer insensible. 

unconscious. Mr. John Young, Plant Owner, was notified 

ofthe Noncompliance and the Establishment's failure to 

adhere to the regulatory requirements of9 CFR 

313.16(a)(1) 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 88 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M44910+P44 

910+V44970 

Abattoir 

Associates Inc. 

{657CC8C0-66A 

B4Dn-9F0A-0D 

19F61300A2} 

JCH3413 

031305N 

-1 

03/05/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.16(a)(1) On 5, March 2021, at establishment 44910, Abattoir 

Associates. while performing voluntary Jnspection, the 

slaughter inspector reported that plant employees 

attempted to stun a Water Buffalo at approximately 0910 

hours. The first attempt was made with a slug, .410--gauge 

long gun, the Water Buffalo remained standing. An 

additional emptoyee aided and performed immediafe 

corrective action, fired the second round from the same 

weapon which rendered the Water Buffalo unconscious. 

Mr. John Young was notified ofthe noncompliance with 9 

CFR 352 and9 CFR31'3.16. Mr. John Young performed 

re-training, stunning oflivestock, domestic and exotic, with 

all slaughter floor employees. Mr. Voting has been notified 

that this noncompliance will be closed. 

CLOSED 

M45099+P45 

099+V45099 

Responslble 

Transportation 

LLC 

{8334COA2-EAF3 

-43S0-A0DB-A41 

A4E68EBAD} 

VOT2316 

022301N 

-1 

02/01/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandlin_g 

313.1S(a)(1) On FebruatV 1. 2021 at approximately 1350hrs, I. ., ·•' 

was performing a HATS Category VIII task, 

stunning effectiveness, in the barn of establishment 

M45099 when I observed a non-compliance. ,I observed the 

designated employee apply a hand-held captive'bolt device 

lo the forehead of a non-ambulatory disabled cow laying In 

Pen 4. The hand-held captive boltdevice audibly 

discharged and contacted the skull, causin.9 a 

small/shallow penetrating wound that was approximately 

1cm In diameter near the center ofthe forehead. The 

CLOSED 

animal remained in sternal recumbel'JCY, breathlng and 

blinking. The animal remained calm. showing no 

tndlcations of discomfort or excitement. The plant 

employee Immediately administered a second stun that 

rendered the anlmal unconscious. 1lmmediately informed 

(b ) (6) ofthe 

noncompliance and he provided verbal corrective actions. I 

informed (b) (6) that a noncompliance report would be 

forthcomin9. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 89 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M45261 FM Meat {2E239F0C-SFC6 LXG0013 01/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1) On January 8th at approximately 1 p.m., while performing OPEN 

Products Limited -46EA-B562-7C9 013608N Humane Handling the humane handling verification task (specifically verifying 

Partnership 0F5'280690} -1 HATS Cateqoiy VHI: Stunning Effectiveness). I, (b) (6) 

. observed the foltowing noncompliance; 

A fractious heifer, the lastanimal to be killed f.or the day, 

refused to enter the knock box. The establishment 

employee attempted to stun her in the serpentine. The 

captive boltwas placed appropriately and discharged, 

making contactwith the heifer's head. After the stun 

attempt, I observed the heifer still standing and vocalizing. 

The employee immediately stunned her a second time. She 

fell to the qround and was insensible. (b} (6) was present and obse.rved the 

noncompliance. He subsequently applied several securily 

knocks alterthe successful stun and bled herin the 

serpentine. I determined that the stunning failure was 

non-egregious because itwas a rare, discrete failure to 

render the animal insensible with a single blow and the 

establishment promptly ..ind effectively corrected the 

noncompliance. This does not meet the regulatory 

requirements of 9 CFR 313.1 S(a)(1 ). This documen! serves 

as written notification thatyour failureto comply with 

regulato1y requirements could result in additional 

regulatory or administrative action. 

M48087+P48 Marin.Sun {3O8EEB61-BF0 RAP0907 01/0512021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1) On ~15/20atapproximately 0845. 1. (b) (6) QLOSED 

087+V48087 Farms, Inc 6-4DAF-B0AC-D 015606N HumaneHandlin_g , observed the following noncompliance Whlle 

567F632SA47} -1 performing HATS category VIII, stunning effectiveness for 

the Livestock Humane Handling task. On 'the slaughter 

floor. while I was watchtng the lamb stunning, I saw an 

animal (tag CACF2 242) still standing after the first 

hand-held captfve bolt knock attempt. but was not 

vocalizing. The stunning employee. then ;ippHed U1e second 

captive bolt knock and the animal went down briefly but 

then popped back up Immediately with stiff legs, but was 

not moving or vocalizfng. No eve movement Was 

observed. I informed(b) (6) ofthe issue. and 

left the floor to notify (b ) (6) . I asked the FSIS line 

inspectors to observe the animal, and they reported that 

the animal Was down after the 2nd knock, and the 

establishment then appITed a 3rd knock to the down animal 

which was not showing signs ofconsciousness (no 

vocalization or eye tracking) at'that time. A U.S. Reiected 

tag B19890445 was applied to theknock box. (b) (6) 

verified a knock hole in the back of the lamb's head caudal 

to the correct position for a poll knock, as well as a 

fotehead knock hole. The Knocking box was released at 

approximately 1050 after corrective action was taken from 

the Establishment. As the establishment failed to produce 

Immediate unconsciousness w1th thefirst stunning blow, 

this rs noncompl\antwith 9 CFR 313.1 S(a)(1). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 90 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M45422+V45 

422 

Messina Meats {12831ED1-6C2 

A-471C-..9861-36 

9F7 AF94302} 

BEJ1810 

011812N 

-1 

01/11/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313,2 On January 11, 2021 at approximately 1530 hours while 

performing antemortem 'inspection onthree heavy calves, 

the Supervisory Public Health Veterinarian (SPHV) asked 

an establishment employeeto move one ofthe heavy 

calves around so that the animal could be better seen in 

CLOSED 

motion from both sides. The employee attempted to move 

the animal ~y using the handle end of a spade shovel and 

proceedeq lojab the animal twice in the flank area. The 

animal jumped and move forward abruptly, (b) (6) , was rn the•immediate 

vicinity and notified of the deficiency and forthcoming 

humane handling noncompliance. After consulting with the 

Front Line Supervisor, a regulatory control action was 

taken and USDA Reject tag #842071686 was applied lo the 

cattle stun box. These observations are noncompliance with 

9CFR 313.2(c). 

M46433 SeraTec Inc. {042C7EE7-04F9 

-4E28-9CFB-0E7 

288EBAFEA} 

VGF1715 

015028N 

-1 

01/28/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.1S(a)(1) HATS Category VIII - Stunning Effectiveness 1/28/2021 

At approximately 10:15a.m. whfle performing online 

tnspection(b) (6) observed the ffve 

stunning operatfons. The stunner took action to apply a 

stun using a pneumatlc captive bolt stunning instrument 

and after the first stun attempt the 

calf vocalized. The employee performing 

stunning immediately applied a second stun with the 

pneumatic captive boll. The second discharge ofthe 

stunntng instrument was immediate and effective. no sign 

ofconsclousness was observed after the second stun was 

applied.. (b) /6) and (b) (6) 

observed the head ofthe calf on the bleeding 

table. two penetrating marks had occurred one of which 

was outside the acceptable areas for effective stunning. 

The other penetrating mark inside the acceptable areas for 

effective stunning. The first stun did not follow CFR. 313.15 

(a) I notified (b) {6) ofthe 

non-compliance.above shortly after thls occurred. The 

establishment has a Robust Humane Handling Plan and 

has not had any humane handling non-compliances for this 

Issue in the last n1nety days. 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 91 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M45471+P45 

471 

New Angus. LLC {0F00D41 1-E231 

-40g5-99A4-2CE 

118DB1BC4} 

VUE1013 

032023N 

-1 

03/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On 3/23/2021 atapproximately 0930 hours, I was 

perfomiing HATS Category VII - Observation for Slips and 

Falls when I observed the following noncompliance: I 

observed adult beef cows moving from the scale to pen 7. 

6 ofthe cattle were dbserved to slip and fall to where their 

belly's touched thefloor1n front of pen .-#19. The cattle 

immediately got up and appeared unhurt. The flooring 

near pen #19 had debris build-up that was covering the 

waffle pattern and was damp and slippery. U.S. Rejett tag 

#822024648 was applred to the cross gate #23 and !b, {fl) 

, was notified of the 

noncompliance with regulation 9 CFR 313. 1 {b) for failure 

to provide adequate footing. Establishment employees 

applied sand to the area, I removed the regulatory -control 

andharvest operations resumed. 

CLOSED 

M45670 Roanoke Pack)ng 

Company 

{B35A707 A-EFD 

9-49FC-A488..CD 

89E696751F} 

FQF4910 

022505N 

-1 

02/05/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category Ill -W;iter & Feed Ava1lability - Whlle 

performtng my verification task, my observation ofthe pens 

at Roanoke Packing Company on 02/05/2021 revealed an 

excessive number of head of sheepTn outside pen number 

2 and overflowing fnto outside.pen number 3 in such a way 

as to proh1bit the furthest animals access to water. I 

notified Chris Holloway at 10:30 am of the non-compliance. 

I rejected the area by placing a USDA Reject/Retain Tag 

#8 30 299550. This represents non-compliance With 9 CFR 

313.2(e}. 

CLOSED 

M45856+V45 

856 

Hylife Foods 

Windom, LLC 

{9ACF8DEE-047 

1-4654-8D39-2E 

CCB8F2248C) 

OD8221 

9033315 

N.1 

03/15/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(1), 

313.15(b)(1) 

(iii) 

At approximately 1841 hours, I was performing a HATS 

Category VIII task, Stunning Effectiveness, in the barn 

when I observed the following noncompliance. An 

establishment employee was attempting to euthanize a 

fatigued market hog by swnning the animal wrth a 

hand-held captive bolt device. The hog was standing in the 

center ofreceiving pen two with no restraint. As the 

employee placed the device, the hog moved its head. The 

hand-held captive bolt device audibly discharged and 

contacted the skull, causing a bleeding wound. The hog 

remained conscious ina standing position, It vocalized and 

walked three feet across the pen towards the wall. A 

second establishment employee immediately reloaded the 

hand-held captive bolt device and applied a follow-up stun, 

whioh effectively rendered the animal insensible. I then 

observed the skull of the hog. I observed a penetrating 

wound approximately two inches above the medial canthus 

of theeyes and one-half inch to the left ofmidline. I 

observed a second penetrating wound on midline 

approximately one-half inch above the medial canthus of 

theey.es. I notified (b) (6) r of the 

ineffective stun noncompliance and he provided verbal 

corrective measures. The establishment failed to meetthe 

requirements of 9 CFR 313.15(a)(1) and313.15(b)(1){iii). 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 92 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M45858 Puget Sound 

Processing, LLC 

{0995AC94-7694 

-4771-83FC-444 

E2CC12552} 

QSV0910 

033919N 

-1 

03/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(1) HATS Category VIII: Stunning EffectivenessAt 

approximately 3:45 pm while verifying HATS Category VIII, 

Stunning Effectiveness, the CSI observed the following 

non-compliance.A hog was loaded into the squeeze chute 

and the first stun was attempted with a hand-held captive 

bolt device. After the first stun attempt, the animal remained 

standing and was vocalizing, with eye's tracking movement. 

The second stun was then attempted with a backup 

hand-held captive bolt device. The second stun attempt 

made contact with the animal above the left eye. The 

animal was still standing and vocalizing with eye's tracking 

movement following the second stun attempt. The third stun 

attempt was applied with the original hand-held captive bolt 

device that had been reloaded. The third stun rendered the 

CLOSED 

animal immediately unconscious. All three stun attempts 

were applied in rapid succession. The head was observed, 

and three defects in the hide caused by the hand held 

captive bolt were discovered. Carneal Strawn, Plant 

Manager was informed ofthis non-compliance. There have 

been no other non-compliances for the same root cause 

within the past 90 days. 

M45858 Puget Sound 

Processing, LLC 

{D9390B11-CE02 

-458D-BECD-97 

E9F8E24875} 

QSV0114 

034231N 

-1 

03/31/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(1) HATS Category VIII: Stunning EffectivenessOn 3-31 at 

approximately 8:28 am a long-horned steer was loaded into 

the stunning chute. The steerjumped through the head 

catch at the front of the chute and was caught by the hips. 

The first stun was then attempted with a hand-held captive 

bolt device (HHCBD). The animal remained standing and a 

second stun attempt was immediately applied with a 

backup HHCBD that was loaded and ready to use. The 

animal remained standing and vocalized. The primary 

HHCBD was then reloaded, and the third stun was 

immediately applied. The third stun rendered the animal 

unconscious. The dressed head was inspected, and three 

penetrating stun holes were observed. When the head was 

split, two of the stun attempts could be seen to have 

penetrated the frontal sinus, but not into the brain. 

Regulatory control was taken and USDA Reject Tag 

B37026696 was applied to the stunning box. Supervisor 

Carneal Strawn. was verbally informed ofthe 

non-compliance. Denver District Office was contacted 

through supervisory channels. This is being associated to 

NR QSV0910033919N for the same root cause. 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 93 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M34554+P34 Wilson Farm {23DE0446-CB61 ORQ301 01/06/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 On 1/6/2021, at approximately 8:00 a.m., While performing CLOSED 

554 Meats, Inc. -4868-AB27-535 4012506 Humane Handling a routine Livestock Humane Handlfnq task and in the 

A8101C9AF} N-1 company of(b) (6) we observed the 

following noncompliance. While. verifying HATS Category 1 

(Inclement Weather), we observed the truck unloading 

driveway and ramp covered with snow. Below the snow, we 

observed a layer ofice. There was no evidence of any 

effort bythe establishment to address this issue prior to 

our observations. At the time ofthe observation, a totat of 

10 beef and 3 goats were already in the pens because 

they arrived the day before. We contacted Plant Manager 

Justin Corman and explained that even though no animals 

were observed to slip or fall on the snow-covered ice, the 

establishment must maintain adequate footing to prevent 

livestock from slipping and falling. Mr. Corman told us that 

an employee would address the matter right away before 

unloading any more animals. Because an immediate 

cmrectfve action was implemented no regulatory control 

action was ta.ken. Around 10:00 a.m., I verified that the 

establishment removed the snol'{ off the driveway leading to 

the truck unloading area and used saltto melt any 

remaining ice and prevent recurrence. Additionally, while. 

verifying HATS Category 4 (Ante-mortem Inspection). we 

observed holes in the floorin the main hallway and in pens 

2 through 5. This was. also brought to the attention of Mr. 

Corman. We explained to him that this could lead to a 

failure ofHATS Category7 (Slips and Falls). This is a 

noncompliance with 313.1 (a) and (b). Mr. Corman was 

notified ofthis noncompliance and the issuance of this 

noncompliance record. 

M45948 Ida-Beef lLC {886CB8A2-8022 AKL2009 01/19/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 HATS Category Ill Water and Feed AvailabilityOn January CLOSED 

-4001-9348-042 010519N HumaneHandling 19. 20211,(b) (6) , was olJts1de In theyards 

DA171EF66} -1 to petfonn antemortem inspection When I observed at 

approximately 7:19AM that the water in the water bucket 

supplying water to pens 3 and 4 was frozen. Cattle were 

present in both pens 3 and 4 atthe time I made the 

observation. The estabOshment has a heater in this bucket 

to prevent freezing. however the water level was lower than, 

the. level of the heater. An establishment yards employee 

broke up the icein the water bucket to allow the cattle 

access to water and I verbal!y notified (b) (6) 

ofthe noncomplfance at approximately 

7:24AM. After perfom1lng antemortem inspectfon and 1 1

upon returninq to the USDA office I verbally notified """ 

ofthe noncompliance.A review of 

the previous 90 days dfd not Identify simllar 

noncompliances therefore this noncompliance record w111 

not be associated. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 94 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M45948 Ida-Beef LLC {C25B1260-C494 AKL4115 02/19/20:21 04C02 Livestock 313,2 HATS Category Ill-Waterand Feed AvailabilitYOn CLOSED 

-4D42-AFC8-3D3 021219N Humane Handling February 19, 2021 at approximately 1PM l,(b) (6} 

3182EEC68} -1 , was in yards performing antemortem inspection. 

During antemortem inspection I observed that the 11 head 

of cattle in pen 2 and the 5 head ofcattle in pen 3 had both 

arrived yesterday February 18, 2021. After. antemortem, 

atapproximately 1:1SPM, I reviewed the establishment's 

cattle receiving log and observed that the cattle in pen 3 

had arrived at 11:15 February 18, 2021 and the cattle in 

pen 2 had arrived at 1:10 February 18, 2021. No AM or 

PM designation was listed, however when I reviewed the 

other cattle listed on the receiving log and compared it to 

the cattle slaughtered February 18, 2021 the records 

supported that The pen 3 cattle arrived at 11:lSAM and the 

pen 2 cattle at 1:10PM. A! 1 :1SPM February 19, 2021 

both pen 2 and 3 still had the same cattle present and no 

feed was availabl'e nor had been provided. At 1 :20PM I 

verbally notified (b) (6) of the 

noncompliance. The cattle from pen 3 were moved to the 

drive alley for slaughter and the cattle from pen 2 were 

moved Into the comer pen and provided with feed by an 

establishment employee. At approximately 2PM I verbally 

notified (b) ( 6) of the noncompliance. 

(b) (6) and (b) (6i reviewedthereceiving logand 

the camera footage and ( ) (6) informed me that the 

receiving time for the cattle in pen 2 was 1:1 0PM February 

18, 2021 and the receiving time for the cattle in pen 3 was 

11: 1 SAM February 18,2021 . There has not been a 

non-compliance issued for the same root cause in the fast 

90days. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday. April 5, 2021 95 

EstNbr EstName N R Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M45948 Ida-Beef LLC {2A959C3F,.A62 AKL5119 02/25/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(b)(1) HATS Category IV-Ante-Mortem Inspection At CLOSED 

D--42S9-89CS-15 024525N Humane Handling (iii) approximately 3:50PM on February 25, 2021 I. (b) (6) 

04B30F368B} -1 • was notified bv (b) (6) 

that(b) (6) was requesting my 

presence at the stunning area. I arrived atthe stunning 

area to observe a Holstein cow lying in sternal recumbency 

in the stun box with both her right front and right rear legs 

outside ofthe stun box. Both front and rear legs on her 

right side were resting within the gap between the stun box 

floor and metal hydraulic lift door of the stun box leading 

into the bleeding area. The animal was unable to rise due 

to both right feet betng on the angled concrete outside of 

the stun box. The animal did not appear distressed, as she 

was not vocalizing nor attempting to rise.(b) (6} 

informed me that he had observed the animal walk into the 

stun box, and the establishment employee had placed the 

head catch on the animal and then the animal sat down. 

Whenthe estabUshment employee released the head 

catch, (b) (6) observed the animal's right rear and 

right front legs slip out ofthe stun box through the gap 

between the concrete stun box fioor and the metal 

hydraulic liftdoorof the stun box. which prevented the 

animal from being able to rise. After I observed the 

animal's position to make a determination on its ambulatory 

status, I observed the establishment employee render the 

animal immediately insensible with a hand held captive bolt 

device. I notifi.ed (b ) (6) ofthe 

noncompliance at approximately 3:56PM. No regulatory 

control action was taken due to the observed immediate 

temporary corrective action. There have been no 

noncompliance re.cords forthe sarne root cause issued 

with the past 90 days. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 96 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46017 ZM.DR DBA {C619F618-3FA6 SDY4706 02/03/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1 HATS Category IV: Antemortem Inspection On CLOSED 

Republic Foods -414D-A335-C70 022104N Humane Handling Wednesday, February 03, 2021 at approximately 1423 

00CD825DC} -1 hours, the following noncompliance was observed.While 

returninq to the USDA office aftergiving USDA breaks, I, 

(b) (6) , observed an angus heifer's head 

stuck between the top .two steel beams ofthe Box 2 gate. 

Establishment employees were working to dislodge her 

head from the gate when I arrived. I witnessed the angus 

heifer slowly lower her hindlimbs whlch made dislodging 

her head more difficult The establishmenl employees tried 

to dislodge her head for approximately 2 minutes after I 

arrived but ultimately knocked her.at approximately 1425 

hours, achieving immediate insensibility with a sing)e 

knock. I observed progressive bradypnea until the heifer 

was stunned. (b) (6} informed the 

establishment CEO at 1435 hours of the 

noncompliance.After discussing the situation with (b) (6} 

, I took regulato1y control action of the Box2 

gate, placing US Rejecttag #B-3999147 at 1517 hours. On 

Thursday, February 04, 2021 at approx.imately 0600 hours, 

I inspected the gates to Box 1 and Box 2 and found the 

area between the top two steel beams now had an 

additional steel beam welded securely between the two 

beams. The available space between the steel beams is 

sma:11 enough to prevent future head trapping occurrences 

and therefore I removed the above US Reject tag.The 

establishment has failed to meet the regulatory 

requirements of 9 CFR 313.'1'(a). A review ofNR history at 

this establjshmentrevealed no recent noncompliance 

records with a similar cause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 97 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Descript ion Status 

M46017 ZM.DR DBA 

Republic Foods 

{96F1E188-AAB 

D-4D6F--9513-AS 

6FA0AF1A0B} 

SDY3913 

031722N 

-1 

03/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 HATS Catego,:y IV: Antemortem lnspectionon Monday, 

March 22, 2021 at approximately 1020 hours, the following 

noncompliance was observed. While perforrninq HATS 

Cateqory VIII: Stunnrng Effectiveness task, I, (b) (6) 

, was approached by an establishment 

employee who stated an angus heifer's head was stuck 

between two steel beams lining the alleyway leading to the 

knock box. I assessed the extent ofthe entrapment, noting 

no obvious injuries and no signs ofdistress. I observed 

establishment employees cut the top beam, which allowed 

them to dislodge her head at approximately 1025 hours. 

The heifer appeared unharmed. Establishment employees 

welded the steel be<!m back Into place priorto driving more 

livestock to the knock box. I informed FSQA Director ofthe 

noncompliance.The establishment has failed to meet the 

regulatory requirements of 9 CFR 313.1 {a). This is being 

associated with NR SDY4706022104N/1 , dated February 

05, 2021, for similar cause offailure to maintain facilities in 

a manner to prevent entrapment and/or injury. Preventive 

measures ofadding additional steel beams on the gates 

was implemented butineffective in preventing incidents 

along the alleyway.On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 

approximately 0610 hours, I verified installation of 

additional beams along the alleyway. 

CLOSED 

MS1302-+PS 1 

302 

Belmont Meats 

LLC 

{253914EA-48F7 

-4087-B6BB-D4C 

58971EOF} 

YAY4706 

022626N 

-1 

02/26/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.2 HATS Category II-Truck Unloading On 2/26/2021 at 

approximately 0711 hours while performing HATS 

Category II Truck unloading, I observed the following 

humanehandling noncompliance. I observed one ofthe 

truck unloaders repeatedly kicl<Jng approximately three live 

pigs in the head and hind legs whiledriVing thern up the 

unloading ramp. Jimmediately took a regulato1y control 

action (RCA) by having him stop the unloading process 

and requested him to stop kicking thepigs. After he 

stopped. I allowed him to continue driving the animals fnto 

the holding pen and verified that he did so humanely, No 

establishment management was present at the ti'me, but I 

notified (b ) (6) ofthe 

noncompliance wlth 9CFR 313.2(a) approximately one 

minute later. He informed me that these truck unloaders 

QLOSED 

typlcally wait to unload anlmals until the establishment 

comes out to help them. He also.informed me that he 

would establish a procedure wfth all the truck unloaders for 

them to wait to ur1load the animals until the establishment 

comes out to help. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 98 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

MS1302+P51 

302 

Belmont Meats 

LLC 

{CA6088A3-F88 

C-4CC6-825D-65 

C61F2D3E57} 

YAY3608 

035005N 

-1 

03/05/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category Ill: Water and Feed Availability On 

3/5/2021 at approximately 0848 hours while performing 

humane handling ·verifica!ion activities at establishment 

MS 1302. 1 observed the folJowing humane handlrng 

noncompliance. I observed approximately six live pigs in 

two uncovered holding penswith no access to water. The 

two buckets in the pens that had held water earlier the 

same morning were laying. on their sides and ·completely 

empty. I immediately Lnformed (b) (6) 

of the noncompliance with 9 CFR 313.2(e). 

He immediately had all the pigs moved into the. holding pen 

abovethepower room and had the basin there filled with 

fresh water. 

CLOSED 

M51302+P51 

302 

Belmont Meats 

LLC 

{259F8673-C113-

4147-B7E1-3681 

734645AF} 

YAY4906 

031219N 

-1 

03/19/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category Ill: Water and Feed Availability On 

3/19/2021 at approxlmately 0705 hours after performing 

antemortem inspection, I observed the following humane 

handlfng noncompliance in theholding pen above the 

powerroom. I observed approximately eight live pigs in the 

holdin.9 pen with no access to water. The blue waterbasin 

was laying on Its side and completely empty. I immediately 

tnformed (b) (6) ofthe 

noncompliance wlth 9 CFR313.2(e). This noncomRliance 

has been observed previously, as documented on 3/5/2021 

in noncompliance record (NR) YAY360803500SN/1. '•·•· 

informed me that. in response to the NR from 

3/5/2021, he had fastened the blue water bastn to the wall 

to prevent the plgs from tipping out all the water. He 

immediately re-fastened the bastn to the wall and filled it 

with fresh water. We also discussed the use of heavier, 

stable basins such as the onein the holding pen next to the 

kill room'to prevent recurrence of this noncompliance. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 99 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

MS1306+VS1 

306 

Powell Meat 

CompanyLLC 

{84D29C27-7896 

-4CFE-A894,FSA 

CB3CS87AE} 

MCU031 

0022218 

N-1 

02/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 HATS Cateqory VII - Slips and Falls At approximately 0850 

hours, I, (b) (6) , was notified by Plant 

Manager, Joe Applegate, thatan animal was down with its 

head entrapped undera gate in the areabehind the knock 

box. This animal had passed antemortem inspection 

earlier in the morning. I immediately wentto the area and 

obseNed an animal down on the floor with its rear end 

toward the knock box and its head entrapped in an 

approximate 8 ,inch gap where the westside gate does not 

reach the floor. The animal had apparently turned around 

and slipped and fallen to the floor and in the process. had 

wedged its head in this gap and itwas unable to 

rise. Establishment employees said they had tried to 

dislodge the animal's head, but they were unable to get the 

animal freed. The animal was notvocalizing but he was 

unable to get loose. Atthis time, the animal was 

immediately knocked with a gunshot and itwas rendered 

insensible with one shot. After discussion with (b) (6) 

• I notified Plant Manager, Joe Applegate, that 

I would be documenting this deficiency In a NR and I 

applied U.S. Rejected Tag#B-45908984 to the area 'behind 

the knock box until temporary corrective actions could be 

taken to fiU the gap between the bottom ofthe gate and the 

floor and thereby prevent any further animal entrapments 

in this space. This noncompliance represents a failure to 

meet the regulatory requirements of9 CFR 313.l(a) and 

313. l(b) At approximately 1026 hours. the establishment 

came to have me reinspect the area and there was a 

wooden barricade filling both the eastand westside gaps 

between the bottom of the gates and the floor thereby 

temporarily correcting this facility deficiency. Atthis time, 

·1 removed the U.S. Retained Tag and allowed slaughter to 

resume. A review ofrecentNR's showed no,similarcause 

NR's that will be Linked to this NR. 

CLOSED 

MS1306+VS1 

306 

Powell Meat 

Company LLC 

{FC8D3648-695D 

-4ES7-AF79-177 

MCSE0F11} 

MCU241 

0035829 

N-1 

03/29/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane. Handling 

313.2 HATS Category 111 -Water and Feed Availability (9CFR 

313.2(e)):Today at approximately 0940 hours while 

performtng antemortem examTnation of cattle presented for 

USDA inspection, I, (b) (6) , observed a cow 

being driven from pen #3 and e>bserved thepan was dry 

with no water In the black rubber pan ln the pen. I also 

observ ed 5 head ofbeefin pen #4 With no water pan in the 

pen. I immediately notified and showed an establishment 

employee ofthe missing water and Informed them that a 

noncompliance would be documented for this deficiency. 

Theemployee immediately placed a black rubber panwith 

water in pen #4 and pen #3 pan was filled so no regulatory 

control action was taken, I immediately went to the front 

office and notified Plan! Manager, JoeApplegate, ofthis 

deficiency and that a NR would be written. TI1ls deficiency 

represents a failure.to meetthe regulatory requirements of 

9 CFR 313.2(e). A review ofrecent NR's dld not show any 

similar cause NR's that will be linked to this NR. 

OPEN 
1

Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 100 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M48277 WJ Wainright 

and Son, tnc 

{S3722F68-A774-

4B30-A71B-8873 

F3B0M87} 

YAQ2808 

033111N 

-1 

03/09/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 Atapproximately 7:00 A.M. while performing the 

antemortem task atEST. 48277 it was noted that there was 

no waterava.ila'bte in pen number one, which had rour 

bovine and pen number two which had two bovines in it 

Plant management was immediately notified, and water was 

provided. This is a violation of9CFR 3.13.2(e). Troy 

Wainright, plant owner, was notified both verbally and With 

the writing ofthis NR1h.atthis non-compliance exists. 

CLOSED 

M46172+P46 

172+V46172 

JM Watkins, LLC {C4294CCC-A72 

6-46EA-AF4fi.2E 

351'5ABC67C} 

IGT0815 

010605N 

-1 

01/05/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandlin.9 

313 .15(a)(1) On 115/2021. at approximately 1015 hours, l, (b ) (6) , was performing a Humane Handling Category 

VIII (Stunning Effectiveness) Task and observed the. 

following noncompliance: An establishment employee 

attempted a head stun on a beef steerin the restrainer by 

discharging the hand:.held captive bolt on the forehead 

area of the beef steer. After the hand-held capuve bolt was 

discharged. it had no effect on the animal, as the beef 

steer remaTned conscious, standing calmly and did not 

vocalize. The establishmentemployee immediately 

switched to the backup pre-loaded rifle and applied an 

effective stun. rendering the animal unconscious. I tagged 

the restrainer with U.5. RejectTag NO. B36822317. 

Establtshment Owner, Mr. Brandon Clare, gave me verbal 

corrective actions and preventative measures to prevent 

reoccurrence and I removed the U.S. Reject tag arid 

slaughter operations resumed. During post-mortem 

inspection, I viewed theskull and observed one hole had 

penelrated the skull, with the hole located two inches above 

the eye 1ne.ln the forehead of theskull. The establishment 

employee said he had shotthe steer in thes ame spot with 

the back-up rifle asthe hand-held caRtiVe bolt This is 

noncompliant with regulation 9 CFR 313.15(a)(1), I 

informed Mr. Clare, of the noncompliance andlssuance of 

the noncompliance record. 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 101 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46351 Meatworks {443A4D81-771E KJR3408 01/29/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1) Humane Handling Category VIII: Stunning Effectiveness At CLOSED 

-46AB-B36B-99E 010129N Humane Handling approximately 0730 hours, while observing stunning on the 

BC28AD68A} -1 first cow ofthe day, the following noncompliance was 

observed: The SPHV and the CSI observed a black cow 

standing in the chute with its head placed properly in the 

head restraint The first captive bolt was fired and did not 

render the animal unconscious evidence by the animal 

remained standing and looked around the room with normal 

blinking and tracking. The establishment had a second 

captive bolt loaded as a backup. This was immediately 

fired and again the animal did not lose consciousness as 

evidenced by the animal remained standing and looked 

around the room with normal blinging and tracking. During 

the second stunning attempt, the first captive bolt used was 

being reloaded. When the establishment employees 

realized the 2nd stunning attempt was unsuccessful, they 

again attempted to stun the cow with the first captive bolt 

that had been reloaded. On the third attempt, the animal 

dropped slightly and closed its eyes for a couple seconds, 

however within a couple of seconds opened its eyes again 

and had normal blinking and was looking around the room. 

Once the establishment employees realized the animal was 

conscious, they reloaded the 2nd captive bolt and on the 

4th attempt, successful stunned the animal. The cow fully 

dropped, there was no blinking, and there were no 

voluntary movements observed .. This is noncompliance 

with 9CFR 313.15(a) (1). The cow chute was rejected for 

use with Tag No. B42155644. Kill floor supervisor was first 

notified ofthe noncompliance as establishment 

management was not yet in for the day. Establishment 

management was then notified ofthe noncompliance. Upon 

observation of the skinned head on post-mortem exam, 

there was one larger cluster of three penetrating captive 

bolt holes (1in tall x 1/2 in wide) that was off midline to the 

cows· left and it was evident that the penetrating rod 

entered only the sinus cavity. There was a smaller, single 

captive bolt hole, approximately 2 inches below the cows' 

poll, approximately 1/2 inch higher from the previous 

cluster and directly on midline, where it was evident that 

the penetrating rod entered the cranial cavity as brain 

matter could be seen. This was the 4th stun attempt that 

rendered the animal unconscious. Although the plant is 

operating under a robust humane handling plan and daily 

records are maintained, the robust systematic approach 

was not properly implemented as the stunning ofan animal 

must produce immediate loss of consciousness, 3 failed 

attempts is egregious. The most recent similar 

noncompliance issued for failure to render an animal 

unconscious occurred on 12/31/2020, NR 

KJR4509123731N, in which establishment employees 

required two stun attempts using a hand-held captive bolt 

device to render a beefcow unconscious. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 102 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46498+P46 

498 

Westmtnster 

MeatPacking 

Inc. 

{6804E375,DDE1 

-4426-BF 18-E8D 

3A8B3ADB9} 

YKBS406 

010505N 

-1 

01/04/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On January 4, 2021 , while conducting the Livestock 

Humane Handling task 1he following noncompliances were 

observed. There were two protrudtng objects found in the 

establishment's holding pens that coutd possible injury 

animals. In pen 1, there was a 3-inch nail protruding from 

the cement wall where animals could be injured if they 

made contact with the object In pen 4, there was a 3.inch 

screw protruding from a latch attached to a siring tied to a 

feeding ,rack used to stor.e straw to feed animals. I notified 

Lashane Fedal (Supervisor) oral and visually about the 

condition ofthe holding pens and thatan NR would be 

written. A regulatory action was initiated, and two rejected 

tags (B42101480, B42101481) was applied to entrance 

gates of both pens. The plant supervisor removed both 

protruding objects and the reject tags we·re removed from 

the entrance gates. Livestock pens, driveways and ramps 

shall be maintained in good repair. They shall be free from 

sharp or protruding objects which may, in the oprnion of 

the inspector. cause injury or pain to the animals. A 

90.day review ofthe establishment's previous 

noncompliance reports did notreveal any related 

non-compliances. 

CLOSED 

M46498+P46 

498 

Westminster 

Meat Packfrig 

Inc. 

{75F25039-66C8-

494 7-9F89-8BA8 

9883376A} 

YKB0007 

010719N 

-1 

01/19/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandlin9 

313.2 On January 19, 2021 at 0715, while coriducting the 

Livestock Humane Handling task the following 

noncompliances were observed.There were two holding 

pens (2 and 4) that were filled to capacity w[th lambs, goats 

and sheep. Both holding pens are 14 ft. by 12 ft. with more 

than 60 animals lnside the pens. The pens consisted of a 

mixture of•lambs. sheep and goats. There are too many 

animals in the pens to get an accurate account of the total 

amount housed in the pens. A regulatory action was taken 

and reJect tags (B40608357, B40608370) were placed on 

the entrance of the doors to both pens.There shall be 

sufficient room In the holding pen for animals held 

overnight to lie down. There should also be enough room in 

the pens to conduct ante mortem before animals are being 

slaughter, I notified (b) (6) oral and visually 

about the condition ofthe holding pens and that an NR 

would be written. A 90-dayreview ofthe establishment's 

previous noncomplfance reports did not reveal any related 

non-compliances. 

CtOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 103 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46498+P46 

498 

Westminster 

Meat Packing 

Inc. 

{3D4C8808-17A6 

-4C89-AESB-9A2 

F81529176) 

YKB5909 

022324N 

-1 

02/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 On February 23, 2021 at 0730 hours, while conducting the 

Livestock Humane Handling task the following 

noncompliance was observed. There were 4 holding pens 

filled with animals that did have access to water. The four 

CLOSED 

holding pens without water were holding pen 3, 4, 5, and 6. 

Abdelkader Fedhal (Owner) stated that the employee 

sometime turns offthe water to the holding pen to allow 

more water pressure when cleaning during pre-operational 

procedures. Abdelkader was notified about the condition of 

the holding pen and that an NR would be issued. The 

animals were immediately given water by plant 

management turning the water back on. Water must be 

available at all times. The animals were immediately given 

water. The animals showed no signs ofduress. 

Additionally, plant management was notified in writing 

through issuance of this NR. After a review ofNRs for the 

last three months, there are no NR's issues for the same 

root cause can be linked atthis time. Continued failure to 

meet these regulatory requirements may result in additional 

regulatory or administrative action per the Rules of 

Practice (9 CFR 500). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 104 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46554+P46 AEElnc. DBA {82C3M19-915A KRP3911 03/1'0/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1) On 03/10/21 atapproximately 1020, 1,(b) (6) , CLOSED 

554 Emory's -48AB-8EA4,98C 033110N Humane Handling along with (b) (6) , were observing the HATS Stunning 

Processing C78925O1C} -1 Effectiveness (Category VIII) on a beef cow with a captive 

boll The following. egr~gious stunning incident occurred. 

A beef cow was loaded into the chute with the head in a 

restraintdevice tt> be stunned. The establishment uses a 

gunpowder charged penetrating captive boll for stunning. 

After the first stun, the head restraint was released, and the 

animal remained standing and looked around blinking. No 

effort on the plantemployee's part was made to make a 

second stunning attempt I told the employee the at1imal is 

still conscious, and something more needs to be done. 

The employee performed another captive bolt stun with the 

same results of the animal standing, looking around and 

blinking. The employee did nottake any immediate action 

and then questioned me about what else he could do. 

Another employee who will be performing Halal ritual 

slaughter suggested shackling and hoisting the animal to 

cut its throat. (The establrshment does no! yet have 

approval for ritual slaughter.) I informed him that a 

conscious animal cannot be shackled, hoisted, or cut until 

rendered unconscious. I informed the employee doing the 

stunning that I could not tell him whatto do butwhat had 

been done was not effective and the animal is still 

conscious so something else needs to be done now. The 

employee applied a third captive bolt stun which was 

effective in rendering the animal unconscious. The 

establishment was informed they were in violation of9 CFR 

313.15(a)(1)&(3) which requires the captive bolt stun to be 

applied to livestock to produce immediate unconsciousness 

in the animals before they are shackled', hoisted, thrown,. 

cast. or cut The Kill floor employees were notified that the 

events were an egregious humane handling 

non-compliance and no further slaughter activities could 

occur. A USDA Rejecttag No. 39324515 was applied to 

the knock box. I verbally informed the plant owner, Anton, 

Kotar, of my observations and that I had taken a regulatory 

rnntrol action on the chute. I notified Mr. Kotar thatI was 

contacting the District Office through my supervisory 

chain-okommand for further guidance, of my 

recommendation for an enforcemen! action, and that no 

further stunning could take place. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 105 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46554+P46 

554 

AEElnc. DBA 

Emory's 

Processing 

{7D67EDBF-7BF 

C-481A-A9AD-S 

C1F11 D273AC} 

KRP3913 

030122N 

-1 

03/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) On 03/22/21 atapproximately 1305, 1,(b) (6) , along wiU, (b) (6) , were observing the HATS Stunning 

Effectiveness (Category VIII) on a beef cow wiU, a captive 

bolt The following stunning incident occurred. A beef cow 

was loaded into the chute with the head in a restraint 

OPEN 

device to be stunned. The establishment uses. a 

gunpowder charged, penetrating captive bolt for stunning. 

After the first stun, the the animal remained standing and 

looked around blinking. Three employees standing nearby 

evaluating for consciousness immediately noted thalthe 

animal was not unconscious. They immediately notified 

the owner who was nearby, hehad a firearm bac:kup on 

hand With which he delivered an effective stun. The 

establishment was informed they were in violation of9 CFR 

313. 15,(a)(l) which requires the captive bolt stun to be 

applied to livestock to produce immediate unconsciousness 

in the animals before they are shackled, 'hoisted, thrown, 

cast, or cut. On this date, the establishment started an 

abeyance of suspension for slaughter following a beefcow 

stun failure on 3/10/21, NR: KRP3911033110N. I verbally 

informed the plant owner, Anton Kolar, that I would contact 

the district office for further guidance. District advised that 

the suspension for slaughter could remain in abeyance 

and an NR would be issued for today's event. I notified Mr. 

Kotar that an NR would be issued but the plant could 

rnntinue with slaughter operations. He'informed me thal 

their firs! step would be to evaluate the skull to check 

placement ofthe first stun attempt 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 106 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46578+P46 

578 

Ram Country 

Meats 

{S 1 E79EAE-9BB 

6-4834-AE4E-93 

CBF7E4508F.} 

QGB401 

0011027 

N-1 

01/27/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1), 

37 3.15/a)(3) 

HATS Category VIII: Stunning EffeclivenessOn 

Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 0802 the following 

Livestock Humane Handling noncompliance was observed 

at Ram Country Meats. The third beef was knocked 

followed by the knock box door beinq lifted. When the 

door was fully lifted, I, (b) (6} ,was able to see 

thatthis beef was in a sitting position with the head lifting 

and eyes blinking. The beef slid out of the knockbox into 

the blood pit area and made an attempt to stand. Itdid not 

make any vocal sounds. The. Jnnovative Meats employee 

thatperforms stunning procedures had an additional hand 

held captive bolt device (HHCBD) ready, came down the 

stairs, and immediately stunned the beef forthe second 

time. I observed the beeffor any signs ofconsciousness 

again and determined that after this second stun attempt 

with the HHCBD, the beef was now unconscious. The 

employee shackled the beef, raised and then stuck it to 

bleed. He stated thatthe beef had moved its head at the 

last moment as he was knocking it the first time.The 

following personnel involved with slaughter operations were 

verbally notified of the noncompliance observed: (b) (6) 

.(b) (4) (b) (6) . Ram Country Meats General ManaQer Dr. 

Robert Delmore, and Ram Count:iy Meats (b) (6) 

. (b) (6) stated when 

he was notified thathe had checked both captive bolt guns 

priorto operations this date and had determined that they 

were in good working order. All managers also stated that 

they were aware that noncompliances are issued under 

these circumstances.There are no associated 

noncompliances issued within the past 90 days. 

CLOSED 

M46622 920 Flies Frozen {093AC598-SC24 QCZ3009 01/1912021 04C02 Uvestock 313.16(a)(1), At approximately 0900 hours wllile performlng routine OPEN 

Foods, LLC -482f-A939-8.94 013619N Humane Handling 313.16(b)(1) HATS at920 Fries Frozen Foods the PHV on duty 

A3292EFBB} -1 (iii) observed a humane handling viofation noncompliance. A 

steer was led from the holding pens to the knock box for 

slaughter as normal. The plant's standard gun was used in 

an attemptto render the animal unconscious, but the first 

blow was unsuccessful. The operator lmmediately reloaded 

the firearm but the animal's head was moving, the second 

shot was also Llnsuccessfut atrendering the animal 

unconsc1ous. The third immediate shotrendered the. animal 

unconscious. The plant effectively 1mplemented thefr 

planned corrective action by rendering the animal 

unconsdous. Three. bullet holes were confirmed fn the skull 

after the head was removed, The PHV and inspector 

placed a retain tag (B26036546) on the knock box until the 

enforcement action could be determined and plant 

management was notified ofthe noncompliance. The 

Inability ofthe stunning area to restrain the animal during 

stunning and the three shots are in non-compliance with 

9CFR313.16(a)(1) and 313.16(b)(1)(iii). Please implement 

correcUve.actions to restrain the animal durin,g stunning. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 107 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description St atus 

M46734+P46 

734 

Davis Meat 

Processing LLC 

{135A9504-F3BD 

-4277-8297-FAS 

39C48CEAC} 

MGC241 

2023418 

N-2 

02/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(1) HATS Category VIII - Stunning Effectiveness On February 

18, 2021 at approximately 0815, the followino 

noncompliance was observed by (b) (6) :An 

establishment employee attempted to stun a beef utilizing a 

handheld captive bolt device and failed to render it 

.unconscious. The animal was trying to right itselfand 

voca.lized after the firststunning at!empl The 

establishment employee 'immediately applied a second stun 

using a handheld captive bolt device and successfully 

rendered the animal unconscious. The establishment 

owner, was notified of the noncompliance. I (b) (6) 

) discussed the noncompliance in further detail 

with the owner and Fl Garcia upon my arrival at the planl 

The establishment failed to comply with 9 CFR 

313. 15,(a)(1). 

CLOSED 

M46734+P46 

734 

Davfs Meat 

Processing LLC 

{F8348FD8-7469 

-4886-9E72-4D1 

151A538E1} 

MGC241 

2023418 

N-1 

02/18/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HATS Category 111- Water and Feed Availabllity On 

February 18, 2021 at approximately 0700, thefollowing 

noncompliance was observed by Fl l(b)(6) IWhlie 

conducting antemortem inspection, (6) (6) stated none 

ofthe five cattle held overnight atthe fadlity had any 

access to water. The waterthat was in the troughs was 

frozen solid. The establishment owner, was notified ofthe 

noncompliance. I (b) (6) ) discussed the 

noncompliance in further detail with the ownerand ' ' 

upon my arrival at the ptant, The establishment 

failed to comply Wfth 9 CFR 31'3.2 (e). 

CLOSED 

M45554A+P4 

5554A+V455 

54A 

Great Frontier 

Meats 

{50459039-CB84 

•4CCA-874A,B 19 

054BAD4F8} 

OXR3611 

030924N 

-1 

03/24/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.30(a)(3) At approximately 0817 hours during swine slaughter whil!'? 

performing a Stunning Effectiveness (HATS Category VIII) 

task, I observed the following noncompliance on the first 

market swine ofthe day: Following the first application by 

an establishment employee of the electrical wand behind 

the animal's head, the hog dropped, squealed, and rose 

from where It had fallen iii the small restraining box. The 

hog was still conscious. Immediately theestablishment 

employee stunned the hog with the same electrical wand 

and unit a second time ,rendering the hog unconscious. I 

notified Plant Manager, Ms. Gabrlelle Pioske, of the 

upcoming noncompliance ..No reject tag was used as she 

provided immediate corrective actions and preventative 

measures before slaughter was allowed to resume. This is 

a noncompliance with'313.3Q(a)(1). 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 108 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M46792+P46 

792+V46792 

Integrity Meats {0735D6C9-483C 

-4790,9DB8-39C 

CF529F94A} 

UYJ3817 

010619N 

-1 

01/19/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 While performing humane handling verification. I observed 

!hatthere were five cattle present in the barn's two pens 

and the establishment was about to unload another beef. I 

noticed that both blue waterbarrels were empty .and dry in 

these two pens. I asked the employee where is the water 

andhe said he did not know anything about it I notified 

Elmer establishmentownerwhen hereturned to the 

CLOSED 

establishment and asked ifu,e cattle got water yet. Elmer 

replied he would haul some water out. At approximately 

1 pm, I observed him carrying two pails ofwater to the 

barn. Regulation 9 CFR 313.2(e) states animals shall have 

access to water in all holding pens. This noncompliance 

record (NR) is being associated with NR number 

UYJ0108121731N, dated 12/30/2020, for a stmilar incident 

involving lack ofwater to a pen of cattle. The previous 

corrective actions and preventative measures were either 

not implemented or were not sufficient in preventing 

recurrence of noncompliance. 

M46792-tP46 

792-tV46792 

Integrity Meats {AF.A:D626F-A34 

E-447F-BB47-C3 

DFF3119914} 

UYJi013 

021116N 

-1 

02/16/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandling 

313.2 At approximately 10:58 am while performlng a Humane 

Handling task HATS Category Ill. I observed three steers 

in pen #1 with no water or water containers. I notified (Ill (6) 

Who then notified Sam Hershberger 

employee toprovide water to theanimals. in which he dfd. 

No management was present at the lime. ofinspection. The 

animals had just arrived that morning prior to my 

inspection. The animals seemed healthy. This Is a 

non-compliance. with CFR 313.2(aj, Stating: That water be. 

accessible to livestock In all holding pens, and that animals 

held lo11ger than 24 hours have access to feed. This is 

Non-complfance is similar to the NR's written on January 

19th and December 12th. The preventative. measures of 

NR's UYJ0108121731 N and UYJ0108121731N-1 were not 

tmplemented or were effective 1n preventing a recurrence, 

OPEN 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 109 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Descript ion Status 

M47040+P47 

040 

Indiana H11lal 

Farms LLC 

{85F422A9-94~ E 

-45C9-..9F'2F-656 

624D0FAEE} 

EYZ5614 

014515N 

-1 

01/15/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 HH Category IV-Antemortem lnspection OnJanuary 15, 

2021 at approximately 1420 hours while observing the ritual 

slaughter (halal) of sheep Dr. Starkey observed the 

following noncompliance. The employee placed the twine 

around the fetlock area ofthe ram and placed the loop on 

!he hoisthook In preparation for hoisting the ram forthe 

ritual cut. After the loop was placed on the hook the hoist 

was activated and the ram was hoisted off of the floor while 

CLOSED 

being suspended by the back leg. The employee hoisted 

the ram completely above the crowd gate attached lo the 

open sided knock box. Upon getting the ram hoisted above 

the gate while it was struggling againstthe hoist itfell to the 

ground prior to the administration ofthe,ritual cut. The ram 

immediately stood up and regained its footing without signs 

ofinjury. (b) (6) immediately inquired with Mohamed 

Hosanf, Plant Managerand Aref Al hag, Plant Owner what 

had caused the ram lo fall. Mr. . Alhag responded that the 

employee placed the twine on the fetlock area instead of 

above the heck, The twine was placed appropriately above 

the hock of the animal and the loop placed in the hook for 

the hoist. Once the hoistwas high enough to make the 

twine taught the knotthen came -untied and the ram was 

able to walk around the floor in the area. The twine was 

replaced and the ram was successfully shackled, hoisted. 

and cut. Mr. Hosani and Mr. Alhag were notified both 

verbally and nowin wriitng with this NR ofthe 

establishment's failure to comply with the regulatory 

requirements of 9 CFR 313.2(a). 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 110 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47040+P47 

040 

Indiana H11lal 

Fanns LLC 

{944B62BA-4306 

-4930-BA0l-B85 

C4BC13DAS} 

EYZ5313 

015528N 

-1 

01/28/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.2 Hats Category HI, Water and Feed AvallabilityToday, 

Thursday January 28th, 2021 at approximately 0715 hrs. I 

(b) (6) ) performed ant-mortem inspection on 

today's animals that were presented for slaughter. Among 

other animals there were five veal that were in Pen #7, that 

CLOSED 

hacl arrived,on Monday January 25th. 2021 and had been 

held over each day. The pla/11 had held these five veal over 

due to not having any orders for meat. There was also 

one young beef cow that was held overnight (held over 24 

hours) from the previous day, in Pen #3.There were five 

veal in Pen #7 that had been held over each day since 

1-25-21 did not have access to any food, atthe trme I 

performed ante-mortem inspection.I immediately notified 

the (b) (6) who had accompanied me 

during ante-mortem inspection. I requested (b) (6) to 

provide food for the five veal in Pen #7 and replace the 

dirty water in Pen #3. AJI five veal in Pen# 7 immediately 

started eating when given the hay and were still eating 

when I left the barn. I also no1ified plant ownerAref 

Alhag. Mr. AJhag notified me that he had given food (hay) 

and water to the animals before he leftthe plantearly in the 

afternoon on Wednesday. 1/27121. 9 CFR 313.2(e) states, 

"Animals shall have access to water in all holding pens and, 

ifheld longerthan 24 hours, access to feed.'' Refer to NR 

EYZ030911292SN/1_. dated 11/2512020 that has the same 

root cause. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 111 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47040+P47 

040 

Indiana H11lal 

Fanns LLC 

{36554188-D7D6 

-48DD-9152-12B 

DEECB197E} 

EYZ3813 

022024N 

-1 

02/24/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313,2 HATS Category IV: Ante-mortem Inspection On Februaty 

24, 2021 at approximately 1300 hours while observing 

humane handling of goats (b} (6) observed the 

following noncompliance. A plant employee went to the 

barn to bring the goats ,into the chllte/holding area to await 

ritual slaughterfollowing the cattle. The employee 

proceeded to bring all 12 goats into the holding area. The 

goats came up the ramp ata running pace with lots ol 

excitement and one jumped through the opening in the 

head gates without injury. The employee then came in 

holding two battery powered prods in his hand. When 

asked he stated that he used them ·on thegoats tn order to 

getthem to move faster. After-a couple atminutes there 

was a large amountof commo~on and vocali2ation comrng 

from the goats in the chute/holding area. (b) (6) 

proceeded to the chute to assess whatthe issue was. 

While approaching another team member approached and 

reached over the gates and grabbed the back leg of one of 

the qoats and yanked on it trying to· release the crowding. 

(b) (6) then observed thatthere were at least two 

goats pinned to the ground under the olhergoats and the 

goats were all crowded into the chute area climbing on 

each other. The employee again grabbed the back leg of 

the goatandyanked on jt trying to relieve the crowding, but 

the qoat was also pinned against the framing of the chute. 

(b) (6) then tnstructed the employee to stop and open 

the doorto allow some of the goats lo go back into the 

hallway toward thebarn. Once the door was opened and 

5,.6 ofthe goats were released back into the hallway. the 

vocaJi2ation stopped and those that had been pinned down 

were able to rise with ease and without injury. ArelAlhag, 

Plant Owner and Mohamed Hosani were notified both 

verbally and now in writing with this NRof the 

establishment's failure to comply with the regulatory 

requirements of 9 CFR 313.2(a) and 9 CFR 313.2(b). 

CLOSED 

M47051 IO Ranch {4C3678F3-2944- ACH2415 03/08/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 On 03/08/2021 , whileperfor_ming livestock Ante-Mortem OPEN 

Processing, LlC 4CBC-8274-1298 030308N HumaneHandling Humane Handllng Inspection Verification Task, (b) (6) 

CF982C51} -1 obseNed a Humane Handlinq Noncompliance: 

At approximately 0810 hours {b) (6) observed that 

no water was coming outofthe pfg water nipple on the 

holdin_g pen #7 that contains 5 pigs. {b) (6) 

notified plants slaughter personnel of the noncompliance. 

An immediate corrective. action by turning on the water 

supply Hne was implemented by the plant thus no tag was 

ut1li2ed. This noncompliance represent 9 CFR 

313.2(e) (b) (6) was verbally 

notified ofthe finding and theforthcomlhg noncompliance 

This noncompliance Is being link with NR 

#ACH140808370SN dated 8/512020. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 112 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47104+V47 

104 

Fort Worth Meat 

Packers LLC 

{ED68F64C-949 

E-4C84-8F42-34 

ASE9376F8F} 

EQV0012 

033922N 

-1 

03/22/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 HATS Category VJI : Slips and Falls (9 CFR 313.1) Today 

at approximately 5:40 am, I observed a heifer slip and fall 

down twice In pen #19 while the animals were moved to a 

penacross pen #19. I rejected pen# 19 using US Reject 

taQ # 8 30944133. I discussed it with the establishment 

(b) (6) and notified herthat a 

noncompliance record wot.ild be issued for this deficiency. 

CLOSED 

M47172 F8S Hudson {EA7DFS0A-0F7 

4-4EDF-A2D9•66 

486CACD378} 

GXP3711 

02002AN 

-7 

02/24/2021 04C02 Uvestock 

Humane Handling 

313.16fa)(1) HATS Category Viti: Stunning Effectiveness, 

9CFR313.16(a)(1). At approximately 0900 Wednesday 

February 24, 2021, while performing the HATS activity of 

~stunning effectiveness"' on the slaughter floor. IPP 

observed the planrs employee stunning a beefcow. The 

plant employee was using a ,22 magnum rtfle as his 

stunning device. Following the first stun attempt with the 

.22 magnum rifle. the beef cow remained conscious and 

standing. The plant employee fmmediate!,y applied a 

second stun using a 7.62.)(25 riflewhich rendered the 

animal unconscious. There were no signs ofrtiythmic 

breathing and no palpebral reflex was present follow1ng the 

second stun. IPP took regulatory control action by placing 

a US Reject tag (#836895837) on the establishment's stun 

box. At approximately 0910, IPP informed the 

establishments manager Jared Hamilton, ofthe inhumane 

handling incident. Upon further examtnatron ofthe skinned 

hea.d ofthe above-mentioned animal, IPP observed that the 

placement ofthe fits! shot appeared to be too ht_gh. IPP 

verbally 1nformed Mr. Hamilton that a nor1compliance would 

be issued. Denver District Management was contacted 

through supervisory· channels. Therehas not been an 

incidentofsimilar cause al thls establfshment before. The 

established has a robust systematic approach. 

CLOSED 

M47261 Nordik Meats Inc {7ECEA6D5,12C 

2-44CD,B31 D-85 

7E513F2619} 

WZAOBO 

9010113 

N-1 

01/12/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1 On 1-12-21. at approximately 0920, while preforming a 

routine humane handling task with (b) (6) 

, we no!iced the following noncompliance. While 

verifying HATS category 1 (inclement weather)., we 

observed four hogs in the small holding pen beside Pen C. 

The floor of the pen was fUJly covered in a thlck layerof 

ice. We contacted plant manager. Ross Williams, and 

informed him that although Wf! did not observe any slips or 

falls, the establishment is required to maintain good footing 

for livestock to minimize the potential for slips am;j falls. Mr. 

Williams explained that he putsalt in the pen; however, that 

corrective measure was inadequate to address the 

problem. Mr. Williams immediately moved the hogs lo 

another pen with adequate footing . .He also informed us 

that he would place more salt down and remove the ice 

from the pen before it will be used again. Regulatory 

control tag #815260300 was placed' on the pen. This is a 

noncompliance of 313.1 (b). Mr. Williams was informed of 

this noncornpliarice and that the event would be 

documented in a Noncompliance Record'. 

GLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 113 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47261 Nordik Meats Inc {8E800793-72F9-

4F8D-8038-E48 

A26865F74} 

WZA381 

101 4626 

N-1 

01/26/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.15(a)(2), 

313.2 

At approximately 10:13am while observing for HATS 

Category VIII Stunning Effectiveness, I observed a 

noncompliance in HATS Category VI Electric Prod/ 

Alternative Object Use as follows. I observed Mr. Ross 

Williams bring a large sheep into the stunning area. The 

animal laid down and Mr. Williams grasped the animal by 

the wool to lift it. The sheep showed no signs ofdiscomfort 

or distress as it just laid back down. I immediately stopped 

Mr. Williams and informed him that pulling the wool is 

inappropriate way to move sheep and noncompliance. He 

immediately changed his approach to moving the sheep 

intothe knocking area by manually lifting the animal from 

under it's abdomen. After the sheep was slaughtered and 

hide removed, I observed mild bruising in the 

subcutaneous areas anatomically located where the wool 

was pulled. The stunning area was nottagged due to the 

immediate change in methods for moving sheep into 

stunning area. This is noncompliance with 9 CFR 313.2 

(a) which states, "Driving of livestock from the unloading 

ramps to the holding pens and from the holding pens to the 

stunning area shall be done with a minimum of excitement 

and discomfort to the animals;" 9 CFR 313.2 (b) which 

states, "Electric prods, canvas slappers, or other 

implements employed to drive animals shall be used as little 

as possible in order to minimize excitement and injury. Any 

use of such implements which, in the opinion of the 

inspector, is excessive, is prohibited;" and 9 CFR 313.15 

(a)(2) which states, "The driving of the animals to the 

stunning area shall be done with a minimum of excitement 

and discomfort to the animals." 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 114 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47261 Nordik Meats Inc {904C95E7-3745 WZA461 02/03/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(2), On 2-3-21 while conducting a humane handling task, HATS CLOSED 

-4188-A401-841 3024603 Humane Handling 313.15(b)(1) Category VIII, I noticed the following noncompliance with 

D004D8228} N-2 (iii), 313.2 HATS category VI. At approximately 1145 a steer was 

being driven into the stunning chute using a handheld. 

battery operated electric prod. The animal was excited as it 

entered the stun box and was able to push its body halfway 

through the headgate. Plant Manager Ross Williams 

haltered the steer and eased it back into the stun box to be 

properly secured in the headgate prior to stunning. I 

discussed this incident with Mr. Williams. At 1327 another 

steer was driven into the stun box by a battery operated. 

handheld electric prod. This animal was shocked multiple 

times on the back and hindquarters. The steer entered the 

stun box overexcited and pushed its body halfway through 

the headgate. Its front legs slipped but it gained footing. 

The steer was then haltered and stunned effectively without 

being fully placed back into the stun box. After the hide 

was removed from this steer, the carcass had bilateral 

bruising near the pelvis. The bruises were approximately 5 

inches in diameter. The left side of the animal had more 

severe bruising consistent with where the animal was stuck 

in the chute. I told Mr. Williams that I would be 

documenting the noncompliance in a noncompliance 

record. A control action was taken by placing U.S. 

Rejected Tag no. B 15260299 onto the stun box. This is a 

noncompliance for 9 CFR 313.2(b) and 313.15(a)(2) which 

requires electric prods to be used as minimally as possible 

to reduce excitement or injury to the animals. This is also 

a noncompliance with 313.15(b)(1 )(iii) which requires the 

stunning area to be designed and constructed as to limit 

the free movements ofanimals sufficiently to allow the 

operator to locate the stunning blow with a high degree of 

accuracy. 

M47261 Nordik Meats Inc {606D5FB7-91C WZA250 02/17/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.15(a)(1) At 0945 hours, while perfonning a HATS Category VIII CLOSED 

E-4EDF-8603-91 7023418 Humane Handling Stunning Effectiveness Task, Inspection Program 

8015DBF09E} N-1 Personnel (IPP) observed an establishment employee take 

two stunning attempts, with a hand-held captive bolt device 

(HHCB). to render a steer unconscious. After the first 

unsuccessful stun the animal was still conscious as it 

remained standing and bellowed. The animal did not move 

or seem distressed. but blood was seen coming from its 

nostrils. The employee immediately grabbed the 

pre-loaded backup HHCB and stunned the animal again 

rendering it unconscious. This is a noncompliance with 9 

CFR 313.15(a)(1). IPP informed Mr. Williams ofthe 

noncompliance and the issuance ofthis noncompliance 

record. A regulatory control tag. Reject Tag #815260290 

was placed on the stunning area until verbal corrective 

actions and preventive measures were proffered. During 

postmortem inspection IPP observed two holes in the skull 

one being approximately 1 inch above at the eyeline and 

the other being 1 and a hatf inches above. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 115 

EstNbr EstName NR Id I NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47366 Missouri Prime {9839599B-7F54 ECAS307 03/25/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.2 At approximately 3:15 pm, I verbally notified (b) (6) OPEN 

Beef Packers -4716-AA 14-1 F8 035626N Humane Handling , of my decision to take 

D8B2A082B} -1 

. 

regulatory control action to prevent the slaughter of 

animals. I advised (b) (6) that I was contacting the 

District Office about possible enforcement action due to an 

egregious humane handling noncompliance and thalthe 

District Office would befollowing up with a written 

suspension orNOIE letter to the establishmenL I based my 

decision to take a regulatory control action on the 

following: At approximately 1205 pm, while perfurminq a 

HATS Category VIII Stunning Effectiveness, (b) (6) 

observed the full muzzle including both nostrils ofone black 

baldie cow pointing out the side ofthe knockbox and the 

cow's head being caught under the rear gate as the 

hydraulically controlled side gate was being lowered closed 

to rese! the stunning process.for the next cow. From the 

CSl's elevated vantage point the entire side and rear 

hydraulic gate of the knockbox was visible. Immediately as 

the side gate had closed, one each ofthe cow's fronland 

rear legs jetted out underneath the alley way panels utilized 

to direct cattle to the knockbox. A barn employee identified 

with a brown colored hard hat began trying to push the 

cows leqs back into the alleyway from under the panels, 

(b) (6) changed positions from the staircase to 

directly in front ofthe knockbox to gain visibility into the 

alleyway. Atthis lime both the front and rear knockbox 

hydraulic gates had been lifted to the open position by the 

stunning employee p roviding 100% view down the 

alleyway. From this vantage point an observation was made 

of the cow previously described lying in right lateral 

recumbency within the alleyway and a se.cond cow 

standing on top of her using both front legs. Three plant 

employees began attempting to move the standing cow 

back up the alleyway and offthe downed cow. USDA reject 

taQ B29606792 was applied to the knockbox and 10116' 

traveled back to the USDA office to report the 

incident to the (b ) (6) . Before leaving the area, 

(b) (6) visually observed the downed cow attempting 

to pick her head up and displayin~ breathing chest 

movements. At the time of(b) (6) arrival in the 

stunning area, plant employees had successfully removed 

the standing cow from the alley returning her to the barn 

pe:n system. The downed cow remained in the alley behind 

the knockbox 'in right lateral recumbenc¥ but her legs had 

been repositioned inside the alleyway. The downed cow 

was not displaying any siqns of movement, and rhythmic 

breathu,g was absent. (b) (6) further verified the cow 

was already deceased as clinical signs oflife were absent 

during a digital palpebral and corneal reflex test. While 

performtng corneal reflex test. (b) (6) verified the cow 

had not received stunning procedures yetvisible with the 

absence of any head holes produced by captive bolt 

equipment I then advised (b) (6) .(b) (6) 

• and (b) (6) 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 116 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

thatthe cow was deceased. (b) (6) instructed 

rnmpany employees to administer the establishment's 

double knock procedure before shackling the cow for 

removal out of the alleyway system. I then advised"'' 11 

I was implementing a regulatory control action 

lo stop the slaughterofanimals. but allowed all stunned 

cattle to move through the slaughter process. The knockbox 

remained under control using USDA RejectTag number 

B29606792 loprevent cattte from entering the knockbox. 

The cow was exsa11guinated in the live animal pen system, 

and slash with denature procedures were verified in the 

presence of(b ) (6) .The establishment is 

noncompliant with 9 CFR313.2(a). 

M47369 JMF Slaughter {8FD4A241-3592 OZK1007 03/25/2021 04C02 Uvestock 313.1S(a)(1) On 3/25/21 at approximately 0830 hours, (b) {6) OPEN 

(Mobile Unit) -4F4G-8SFE-612 035929N Humane Handling . while performing HATS category VIII, 

6F2860259} stunning effectiveness for the livestock Humane Handling 

task, observed the following. A steer required a second 

stun to effectfvety stun the animal, afterthe first stunning 

attempt didn't produceunconsciousness. After the first 

stun With a handheld penetrating captive bolt devlce, the 

steer remained standing and vocalizing. The stunning 

employeethen. lmrriedialely and effecttvely re-stunned the 

cow with a loaded backup device. (b) (6) 

notified employee(b ) {6) of the situation, and 

tagged the knock box with US Reject tag No. B42071709 ln 

accordancewrth 9 CFR 313.50 (c). Upon inspection of 

the. skinned head, there were two distinct knock holes, one 

centered just above the eye1ihe (1st ineffective stun), and 

one centered higher up in the middle. ofthe forehead (2nd 

effective stun). As theestablishment failed to produce 

immedfate unconsciousness with thefirst stunning blow. 

this fs noncompllant wiU1 9 CFR 313.1 S(a)(1). 

-1 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 117 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47370 PHP Schmidt 

Meat Processing 

{DBBA4B24°C2C 

~497D·AFB3-ED 

D077658A 1 S} 

QOF4513 

015721N 

-1 

01/21/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.16(a)(1) HATS Category VIII· Stunning EffectivenessOn Thursday, 

January 21, 2021 at approximately 0833 hours. (bi (6) 

observed a stunning failure on a 

Bull/Stag in the establishment's slaughter area. An 

establishment employee applied the initial stun with a (~ 

Ma9). After Inspection Personnel heard the second stun 

observed the Bull/Stag down, but 

alert with labored vocalizing and heavy panting. Inspection 

Personnel stepped away from the knocking area as 

instructed by establishment personnel. Inspection 

Personnel then heard a third stun applied to the Bull/Stag. 

After the third stun. Inspection Personnel observed the 

Bull/Stag was unconscious. (b) (6) 

stepped away from the knocking area and I heard a fourth 

stun (secure shot) applied to the Bull/Stag. (b) (6) 

took regulatory control action by placing. U.S. 

Rejected Tag number B 24916627 on the knock box to 

investigate how many ineffective stuns (shots) were 

applied. Atapproximately 01005 hours Inspection 

Personnel observed the head of the Bull/Stag and found 

(3) holes, The first stun was observed to be missed. The 

second stun was ineffective, and the third stun appeared to 

be on target. A hole from the fourth stun was not visibly 

observed on the head or the carcass of the Bull/Stag, 

which indicates that the fourth stun (secure shot) 

completely missed the Bull/Stag. I infonned the Kill Floor 

and QA manager that a noncornpllance report would be 

issued. This is a failure to meet the regulatory 

requirements of 9CFR 3H16(a). 

CLOSED 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, '2021 118 

Est Nbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Task TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47399 Wyoming Ranch {ESC2DC8D-AS4 SLS4419 02/02/2021 04C02 Livestock 313.1S(a)(1), Atapproximately 1505 hrs., ( b) (6) was on the CLOSED 

Foods, LLC 8-4C26-8BAF-74 021002N Humane Handling 313.15(b)(1) slaughter fioor when I observed the establishment having 

0E.F53DD688} -1 (iii) an issue bringing an animal into the facility. I heard a beef 

vocalizing and observed the animal unwilling to walk to the 

stun box. The Owner was trying everything possible to 

humanely drive the animal. I observed an electrfcal prod 

humanely being used which caused the animal to vocalize 

several times, but the animal was still unwllling to move.The 

animal at one point got its leg stuck in between the poles of 

the alley and was then left alone. The animal remained 

alone for another 10 minutes and still was unwilling to move 

butdid getits leg unstuck. The owner asked for both 

hand-held captive bolt devices tobe able to stun the animal 

in the alley rather than to continue to try to drive the animal 

to the stun box. The owner elected to restrain the beefin 

the aUey with a backstop (pole) A restrain was in place to 

preventthe animal from walking backwards. At 

approximately 1513 hrs. The Owner applied the first stun 

attempt to the animal with the hand•held captive boll 

device. I observed the animal remain standing, knock 

down the backstop (pole) and walk backwards down the 

alley. I observed blood coming from the lop ofthe head 

(poll). At approximately 1515 hrs. a second stun attempt 

was applied. which successfully rendered the animal 

4nconscious. U.S. Reject Tag #B32613631 was applied to 

the stun box and the establishment management was 

verbally notified of the noncompliance. The Denver District 

ManagemenrTearn was contacted through supervisory 

channels.Upon review of the dressed head, I observed only 

one stun hole in the target zone on the forehead which had 

pertetrated the skull, but I did not observe the stun hole in 

the top of the poll. The havebeen no non-compliance 

records issued for the same root cause since the 

establishment started operations on December 1, 2020. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 119 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Ta.sk TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47484+P47 

484 

The Durand 

Smokehouse LLC 

{124E2C1 F-324C 

-4FSA-8FAS-C77 

19B448B8B} 

SLO3514 

023611N 

-1 

02/11/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) On 2/11/2021 , at ~pproximately 0800 hours, 1,(b) (6) . was performing a Humane Handling Category 

VIII (Stunning Effectiveness) Task and observed the 

following noncompliance: an establishment employee 

attempted a head stun on a beef steer in the restrainer by 

discharging the hand-held captive boll on the forehead 

area of the beef steer. After the hand-heJd captive bolt was 

discharged, it appeared to have no effect on the animal, as 

the beefsteer remained conscious, standing calmly and 

did notvocalize. The establishment employee immediately 

reloaded the hand-hetd captive bolt and applied an 

effective stun, rendering the animal unconscious. The 

establishment employee then reloaded the hand-held 

captive boll and applied a security stun. I look a regulatory 

control action by verbally informing Establishment 

Co-Owner Mitch Auld that I was suspending slaughter 

operations. Mr. Auldgave me verbal corrective actions and 

preventative measures lo prevent reoccurrence .and I 

informed him that slaughter operations can resume. During 

postmortem inspection, I viewed the skull and observed 

three holes had penetrated the skull, wilh one hole located 

two inches above the eye line in the forehead of the skull 

and the other two holes two inches above the 

CLOSED 

aforementioned hole. This is noncompliant with regulation 9 

CFR 3U1S(a)(1). I informed Mr. Auld, of the 

noncompliance and issuance of the noncompliance 

record. 
Table: Noncompliance Reports in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 120 

EstNbr EstName NR Id NR# Date Ta.sk TaskName Regs Description Status 

M47484+P47 

484 

The Durand 

Smokehouse LLC 

{06ACB6E2-688 

E-4104-.956D,E7 

9368B11B85} 

SLO5112 

034412N 

-1 

03/11/2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane Handling 

313.1S(a)(1) On 3/11/2021 , at approximately 0830 hours, 1,(b) (6) , was performing a Humane Handling Category 

VIII (Stunning Effectiveness) Task and observed the 

following noncompliance: an establishment employee 

attempted a head stun on a beef steer in the restrainer by 

discharging the hand-held captive boll on the forehead 

area of the beef steer. After the hand-held captive bolt was 

discharged. it appeared to have no effect on the animal, as 

the beefsteer remained conscious, standing calmly and 

did notvocalize. The establishment employee immediately 

reloaded the hand-hetd captive bolt and applied an 

effective stun, rendering the animal unconscious. I took a 

regulaloiy control action by verbally informing 

Establishment Co-Owner Mitch Auld that I was suspending 

slaughter operations. Mr. Autd gave me verbal corrective 

actions and preventative measures to-prevent 

reoccurrence and I informed him that staughter operations 

can resume. During postmortem inspection. I viewed the 

skull and observed two holes had penetrated the skl'.JIJ, with 

one hole located two Inches above lhe eye line in the 

forehead of the skull andthe other hole one inch above the 

CLOSED 

aforementioned hole, which did not fully penetrate the skull 

to the brain cavity. This is noncompliant with regulation 9 

CFR 313.15(a)(1). I informed Mr. Auld. ofthe 

noncompliance and issuance of the noncompliance 

record. A similar noncompliance was documented on 

2/11/2021 on NR SLO3514023611 N. The estabLishments 

further planned actions were either not implemented or 

were inadequate to prevent this noncompliance from 

reoccurring. 

M47491 C&S Meat Design {2D465310-B74A 

-4150-8FE3-3SF 

E4BM0714} 

WJG081 

1034323 

N-1 

03/23/2021 04C02 Livestock 

HumaneHandlin_g 

313.16(a)(1) On March 23. 2021 at approximate!y 9:15AM.(b) (6) 

, while Performing Robust Humane Handling review 

at C&S Meat Design est. No. M47491, observed Chet 

Clayburn. owner miss the first knock on beef #2, Mr. 

CLOSED 

Clayburn immediately rendered the animal unconscious 

followinq the establishments humane handling plan (b) (6) 

informed Mr. C.het Clayburn that a non 

compliance record would be issued for a stunning miss 

knock as per(b ) (6) instructions'. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 1 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M11032+P11 

032+V11032 

Northwest Premium Meats, LLC AOC4408023 

111G 

11FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 2/10/21 at approximately 1100 hours, it was observed that the record titled 

"maintenance log" was not filled out for the hand 'held captive bolt devices, prior 

to the beginninq of the shi~ I verbally notified (b) (6) 

of the issue. (b) (6) then asked (b) (6) ifthe maintenance was performed, 

and It was found the captive bolt maintenance was oot performed before the 

shift. Item 2 - Maintenance ofthe current verification plan for M11032 states 

"Maintenance will be conducted daily (on slaughter days) prior to the start of 

slaughter operations. The establishment will maintain a record on the 

"Maintenance Log"." 

M1361 VPP Group, LlC QQO2413032 23MAR2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized When I was on the head station for2pm breaks I saw thestunning operator 

423G Humane 

Handling 

using the hand knocker for multiple cows. I observed h im leaning over the 

knocking box with the hand knocker. Hfs legs were offthe ground. Several 

minutes later, I noticed a cow·s head that had three stunning holes. One ofthe 

holes was in the poll -1.5 inches medial to where the right horn was cut off. 

Another hole was in the middle ofthe frontal lobe in theintersection of two lines 

~ach drawn from the medial c.anthus ofthe eye to thebase of the. opposite 

hom. A third stunning hole was -25inches from the middle hole toward the 

lateral canthus ofthe left eye. I notified Establishment management who when 

discussed this situation with the employee and emphasized to foflow the 

establishment's protocol about notifying a supervisor with an ineffective stun. 

M17D+P761 

3+V17D 

Smithfield Packaged Meats 

Corp. 

WLJ1415010 

019G 

19JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized While giving afternoon breaks on heads from approximately U30 hours to 1400 

hours, I railed outthree hogs forfurther veterinary inspection because rattle 

paddle marks were seen on the dorsum ofthe three hogs. The first was tattooed 

With 8571 , and the mark was close to the neck on the left side ofthe 

carcass. Approximately half ofthe paddle. and 1,2 inches ofthe handle could 

be seen. The second was also tattooed with 8571 , and the mark was justto the 

right of mid line, Onty the top quarter ofthe paddle could be seen. The third hog 

was tattooed with 8572, and the markwas just to theleft ofmidline. The top 

quarter ofthe paddle could be seen. After indicating that the second hoq should 

be railed out, I called for a supervisor to come to the line. (b) (6) 

came to the line and was informed ofmy findings. He made sure the 

carcasses were ralled out and he took pictures ofthe injuries. He then called 

down to the procurement office to let them know and sent the pictures along. 

Wheli I went to the veterinary disposition stand just after 1400 hours. I informed 

(b) (6) ofthe third hog with the different tattoo number. I also took pictures 

for documentation.At approximately 1434 hours, I called ( b) ( 6) 

in the barn to inform him of my findings. He 

immediately began investigating and called backafter a few minutes to inform 

(Tle that both tattoo numbers were from the same farm. I then emailed the 

pictures alon(I with a brief description to (b) (6) and (b) (6) 

with the(b ) (6) . cc'd. I informed (b) (6) and'""' 

of the expectation of continued investigafion and reporting back their 

findings. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 2 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M18079+P27 

232 

Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp. VFB0308010 

804G 

04JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized PREDICA TIONWhile going to Livestock to perfonn ante mortem dispositions I 

observed a live animal lyinq. outside of segreqation pen.OBJECTIVE! metwith 

(b) (6) ,(b) (6) , and (b) (6) to make them 

aware of my findings.SUMMARY At approximately 0752, I observed a live animal 

lying outside the segregation pen nearthe B-side CO2 chambers. The animal 

had been removed from the drive alley leading to the CO2 chambers and left 

there. All plant employees in that area were on break atthe time. The area 

outside the segregation pen. in whi<;;h the animal was left. contained various 

items (metal poles, meta.I screens, broken plastic panels with sharp edges, and 

two large unused fans) on the floor that could pose as a potential hazard for the 

animal. Also, a gate in the area allowinq access to a staircase leadinq to a 

lowertevelwasopen.lnotified (b) (6) ,(b) (6) , and (b) (6) ofmy 

findings. (b} (6) had the animal euthanized upon notification. To prevent 

recurrence, (b} (6) stated that the establishment will retrain all applicable 

employees in the involved area for both 1st and 2nd shifts on the proper way to 

secure anlITlals removed from the drive alley.The establishment's written 

humane handling program requires nonambulatory/fatigued animals removed 

from drive alleys to be placed in a dedicated area oreuthanized. Failure to 

properly implement your writtei1 humane handling program could result in the 

program notbeing recognized as robust. Injury to animals from the described 

conditions could result in regulatory oradministrative action.BACKGROUNDEsl. 

18079 ,is a very large hog slaughtering facility. A similar incident in which a Jive 

animal was left in an area outside ofa se.gregation pen was observed on 

11/24/2020and documented on MOI VFB2709112424G. 

M18632+P18 

632+V18632 

Hudson Meats &and Sausage, 

Inc, 

TFO1312014 

314G 

14JAN2021 04C02 Livestock. 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On December 17th I met with ( b) (6J . to review the 

establishment's Systematic Humane Handling Program in response to the 

establishment requesting a determ1hation of whether thetr program meets the 

requirements of ~obust After reviewing theestablishment's written program, 

implementation, and records, I detennined the program meets the Agency's 

expectatfons for a robust systematic approach to humane handling and 

slaughter of livestock. The implementation ofthe rol.'lust program will basubject 

to ongoing vermcation by IPP duririg routine humane handling verifications 

tasks. The robust status designation may be removed ifthe results ofthe 

ongoing verification reveals the establishment is not implementing the program 

as designed. 

M19185 Speetrum Preferred Meats, Inc ASE1908021 

610G 

10FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized At approximately 1030 on 2/9/2021 , 2 trucks were observed on the 

establishment premises not property boarded up for the weather conditions. 

One was approximately 87% closed and the other was approximately 78% 

closed. The airtemperature was 2 degrees Fahrenheit The establishment's 

Written humane handling plan states that when the temperature is below 11 

degrees Fahrenheittrailers should be 90 to 95% closed. These findinqs were 

discussed with(b} (6} and (b) (6) , who addressed the inadequate. boarding of the trucks with the drivers. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 3 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M1962+P196 

2 

Perry Way Foods. LLC LIN37110311 

16G 

16MAR2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized HATS Cate_gory IX • Conscious Animals on the Rail On 3/1512021 at 1500 hrs, 

while observing consciousness on the rail between the sticker·and the ear tag 

remova.l station, t observed a hanging, shackled sow showing signs ofregaining 

sensibility. I observed spontaneous blinking as the sow was exiting the wash 

cabinet, however I could not determine if the .eyes were tracking movement. I 

then signaled for the line to be stopped and fora captive bolloperator to stun 

the sow. While waiting for the captive boltto arrive, an employee made a cut 

into the skin of the saw's leg with a knrfe. After the cutwas made, the sow's 

fegs began to move spasticaJly. A captive bolt gun was used to give the sow .a 

security knock, followed by more reflexive leg kicking, I took a regulatory 

control action by placing US Reject ta.9 B3351 1812on the opening to the V ' 

restrainer and instructed employees to discontinue stunning. I called the 

district management team forfurther guidance. I then spoke with (b) (6) 

and(b) (6) in my office to share my observations and final 

decisions. I stated there was notenough evidence to definitively say the sow 

was conscious. I did not observe a righting reflex, coordinated head or feg 

movement, nordid I hearvocalization. However, I did observe evidence the 

sow was in the process ofregaining sensibility. and it was potentially close to 

being conscious. We discussed ideas forthe company to improve 

identification and response time to similar incidents in the future. though no 

decision was made during our discussion. 

M2049+P204 

9 

Iowa State• University Meat 

Laboratory 

PRB2113024 

022G 

22FEB2021 Finalized Met with (b) (6) to discuss;Both plant and IPP have received copies 

via emall oftheHumane Handling audit done by(b) (6) on 

2/412021.Slaughter this Thursday will be.4 beef. not 6. 1 each of steer. heifer. 

cow and bull. Anlmals will be dropped offWednesday afternoon aroLJnd 1400 

hours. Animals are forANSI 270 class.Darling lnt.. the company that handles 

all inedible removal for the plant has slown doY>(n due to increase. tn cost/lower 

supply of natural gas. Plant ls diverting some inedible to the University 

incinerator to avoid a backup. Itls not clear when normal operations will resume 

at Darling. 

M20608+P20 

608 

The Pork Company KVC0515025 

220G 

20FE82021 Finalized Al.approximately 245pm, I was sitting at my desk in the office (trailer outside 

establishment) and I heard loud squealing/baulking coming from the barn. I 

wentto the barn to see what was going on. As I approached the barn, I could 

tell that the squealing/baulking was coming from the back end of the barn (pens 

A 1 to A4). I went to those pens and sawthat there was an employee in pen A 1 

and an empl'oyeein pen A2. They were paddling at thepigs in the pens. Half of 

the pigs in both pens werepushed up against each other and the gate and the 

other half ofthe pigs were atthe opposite end of the pens. I asked the 

employee in pen A 1 what was going on. He stated thatthey needed to recount 

the pigs and he was having a hard time getting the pigs to move. I explained that 

what they were doing was causing the pigs stress and could lead to injury. No 

pigs were injured. There were several empty pens around so I suggested ifthey 

rieeded to recountpigs that they do it by moving the pigs into one ofthe empty 

pens that way the pigs coiJld move aboutfreely and not end up pinned against 

pne another. The employee acknowledged that he should have done that and 

would do thatin the future. I then le:ftthe barn. When I got outside the barn the 

(b) (6) , was standing near the gate .. l explained to 

him whathad just happened and the conversation that I had wfth the employee. 

He stated that he would speak to the employees. 

-
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 4 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M20892+P20 

892+V20892 

Delta Meat & Sausage Co. QGO5213022 

11 9G 

19FEB2021 Finalized Present Ms. Jeannie Pinkelman (owner). (b) {6) This 

memo is to summarize our conversation on Wednesday Februar:y 17, 2021 

regarding humane handling. 1. FSIS is -required to observe animals being 

unloaded from trailers and moved throughout the barn. 2. People handling 

animals may use any tools or methods withinthe scope of their problem-salving 

capabilities ,provided that the tools and methods do not cause additional stress 

ta the animals. 3. 'if necessary with a new stun operator, IPP, [he planlmanager 

and the new stun operator will agree on a new arrangement for IPP to verify 

effective stunning that supports safe\y for all and minimizes stress on the stun 

operator. FSIS inspection program personnel (IPP) are required to observe 

animals being, un'loaded from trailers into the barn and holding pens. IPP are 

also required to observe the handling and the movementofthe animals 

throughout the barn. All people (employees, farmers. truck drivers, etc.) an the 

Delta Meat and Sausage premises are required to handle animals while inciting 

minimal amounts of stress beyond the animals' innate level of stress. IPP look 

far animal responses lncluding but notlimited to enhanced vocalization and 

running. On Thursday February 11, 2021 , I observed bison from Scott. 

Plagerman Farms being unloaded and moved into the stun box. I stood next to 

Ms. Connie Plagerman in the protected area nextto the scale,This kept me as 

safe as possible and minlmized my presence being a distraction to the bison. 

The bison were handled very well; 1 did not observe any actions that concerned 

me. Mr. Plagerman asked what tools are available to him for legally moving 

bison. My response was that he may use any tools ormethods within the scope 

of his problem-solving capabilities provided that thetools and methods do not 

cause stress to the animals as described above. We specifically identified 

sorting sticks, sorting sticks with bags atthe end and even electric prods as 

acceptable tools when used appropriately as described above. On Tuesday 

February 9, 2021 , I observed an employee moving pigs from the barn on to the 

kill floor. The employee used his feel multiple times to move the pigs. The 

employee appeared to pick up the back legs ofthe pigs and walk them forward 

fike wheelbarrows. And the employee. pinched the septum of the nose between 

the nostrils with his fin,gers to tum the pigs. While observing, I noted that the 

pigs were vocalizing more than usual and were running away from the 

employee. While not convinced that this was inhumane, I felt these methods of 

handlmg' were excessive and not necessary as the regular stun operator is able 

to move with just the use a push board the same aged and sized pigs from the 

same farm with less stress. You responded immediately by having the,regular 

stun operator retrain the employee to ensure the highest quality animal handling 

possible. Thank you. Lastly, we discussed IPP safety during stunn[ng with a 

firearm. IPP are required to verify effective stunning. When sheep, goats, sows 

and boars are stunned with a •firearm with the firearm aimed towards the rear of 

the stun box, there is no safe place for me to stand in the barn, and I wait on 

the kill floor. When cattle, bison, yak and other animals are stunned with a 

firearm With the firearm aimed towards the front of the stun box, I feel safe in 

the barn standing around the comer atthe rearof the stun box. This easily 

a.llows me to visually and verbally communicate with the stun operator afl.er each 

stun if 11 feel the need to observe the animal's head to verify effective stunning. 

The current stun operatoris comfortable with this arrangemenl The current 

stun operator ls leaving. We agreed that for a future stun operator, if the 

arrangement needs lo be re..addressed, IPP, the, plant manager and the stun 

operator will come to an agreement that supports safety for all, minimizes stress 
.

Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April .5, 2021 5 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

on the stun operator and ensures IPP the ability to verify humane handling 

- requirements . 

M20892+P20 

892+V20892 

Delta Meat & Sausag.e Co. QG03816035 

524G 

24MAR2021 Finalized HATS Category VIII: Stunning Effectiveness At approximately 0905 hours on 

(Vlarch 24, 2021, f observed an establishment employee, attempt to stun a very 

large mature bull yak with a .30-30 caliber rifle. The an[mal had large horns 

which would notfitinto the head gate withln the stun box. so no head restraint 

was used. For safety reasons. I was positioned outside the stunnin.9 area and 

couldnot direcdy observethe animal following each stun attempt. I heard the 

firearm discharge four times, at Which point I approached the front ofthe stun 

box and observed that theyak was still conscious and standing. I did not 

observe the animal vocalize nor did the animal appear to be fn distress. The 

stun operator reloaded the fireann. and I observed the stun operator apply a 

fifth stun attempt this time from behind the head in the polf. I observed the 

anrmal to continue to remain consdous and standing. I then observed the stun 

operator apply a sixth stun attemptto the animal from behind the head in the 

poll.Afterthe sixth stun attempt the animal became non..ambulatory and was 

verified to be unconscious and remained so as itwas shackled. hoisted, and 

bled. A regulatory control as taken at stun box with US Rejected tag 

#839485839. I verbally notified the establishment management. The Denver 

Distrkt Management team was contacted through supervisory channels. The 

dressed head was observed, and there were four contactpoints in the 

forehead. and twopenetrating stun holes observed behind the poll. None oft.he 

projectiles appear to have penetrated within the target zone. There have been 

no noncompliance records issued for the same root cause in the past 90 days. 

M21741 GASmall Ruminant Research 

and ExtCenterAg Research 

College ofAg 

QVB0010014 

926G 

26JAN2021 Finalized On Jariuary 26th at 1000 hours, IPP discussed the following with plant 

management1. New cattle restraining device/equipmentto be installed 2nd 

week ofFebruary. Will facilitate better control of cattle during stunning 

procedures.2 2 goats and 3 cattle were killed undercustom-exempt today, 

01/26/2021.3. New employees being trained inboth stunning and dressing 

procedures atthe plant under supervision of(b) (6) 

- On Tuesday, February 9th. 2021 at 0900 hours. IPP and DVMS discussed 

verification of humane handling ofswine. One swine was successfully stunned. 

stuck, and hung under supervision on this day. IPP dfscussed renovation of 

chute and head gate. This renovation will start next Monday. February 15th and 

no slaughter w111 take place this week. Slaughter wlll resume on Tuesday, 

February 23rd. 

M21741 GA Small Ruminant Research 

and ExtCenterAg Research 

College ofAg 

QVB2411.024 

509G 

09FEB2021 Finalfzed 
- -

Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April .5, 2021 6 

EstNbr EstName 

M21898+V21 Farmers Union Industries, LLC 

898 

M21938+P21 EcoFrjendly Foods 

938 

M21938+P21 EcoFriendly Foods 

938 

_,_ 

MOINbr 

OXG41l8012 

709G 

FYA0608011 

215G 

FYA4306012 

629G 

Date 

09JAN2021 

15JAN2021 

29JAN2021 

Task 

Code 

04C02 

TaskName 

Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Status MOI Agenda 

Finalized Establishment M21898, Redwood Farms, Estherville, Iowa-Odd-Hour Inspection 

Report.On January 9th, 2021 from 1710 to 19i0 hours, (b) (6) 

performed an Odd-Hour Inspection of Establishment 

M21898, Redwood Farms in Estherville, Iowa. During this period, the 

establlshment was notoperatrng;- No staffwas present during my inspection.-

No -unloading of trucks or movement ofhogs were observed during this time,-

Lighting throughout the new and old barn was good allowing me to easily 

observe the condition ofthe livestock, the availability of water and feed in all 

pens. No issues were noted either in alleys or pens that would lead to harm or 

Injury to the hogs.All hogs occupying 8 pens had water and feed available to 

them at the time of my inspection. Temperature within the barn was 

pleasant-neither hot nor cold. I noticed no evidence that hogs were injured or 

mistreated nor that they were uncomfortable. No dead hogs were observed.Jn 

summation. no issues ofconcern were noted during my inspection. 

Finalized 1.(b} (6) discussed with ·establishment owner Mr. Eggleston on January 

13, 2021 the humane handlin_g verification activities. On 1/6/21, 11 market hogs 

were slaughtered using the electrical stun system, on 1/12/21 3 heifers were 

slaughtered using the ,22 magnum pistol and the .45 as the backup, and on 

1/13/21 5 market hogs were slaughtered using the electrical stun system; 100% 

stunning effectiveness. All verification actlv1tles were acceptable for this 

bi-weekly period ending 1/14/2021. I notified Mr. Eggleston that I recommend 

the contlnuation ofthe vertfication activities.No other topics discussed at this 

time. 

Finalized On Thursday January 28, 2021 I tleld a discussion with establishment owner 

Mr. Eggleston to. discuss the bi-weekly period ofverification activities. of the 

humane handling verificatlon'plan. During this 2 week period the following 

animals were slaughtered: On 1/20/21 2 steer and 2 heifer were slaughtered 

using .45 caliber pistol. On 1/26/21 2 beefcow were slaughtered using .45 

caliber pistol and 6 lamb were slaughtered using .22 pistol. On 1/27/21 14 

markethogs were slaughtered using the electrical stunning system; 100% 

stunning effectiveness. I recommend the continuation of the verification 

activities. 

M21938+P21 EcoFriendly Foods FY'A1711021 16FEB2021 Finalfzed I. (b) (6) , held a discussion with plant owner Mr. Eggleston to discuss the 

938 016G Humane Handling \lerificatlon activities during the bi-weekly period orJanuary

28. 2021-February 11, 2021 .On 2/10/2113 market hogs were slau9htered 

using the electrical stunning system: 100% stunning effectiveness. I 

recommend the continuation of the verification activities. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 7 

Task 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M22095+P22 Creston Valley Meats Q011210024 25FEB2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized On Wednesday, 2/2412021, al approximately 10:45 am, the establishment was 

095+V22095 725G Humane offloading market hogs from a customer's trailer into the establishment's holding 

Handling pens. The estabfishmen! had some difficulty moving the hogs 'from the trailer 

and asked the customerto move the traUer Into a better position, which caused 

a decrease in height from the trailer to the loading pen. After moving the trailer, 

the establishment attempted lo move the hogs out ofthe trailer and noticed the 

customer near the opening df the trailer. Miguel Anducho, plant manager ofthe 

slaughter floor and his (b) (6} , did not ask for any help or assi.stance 

from the customer and indicated they will handle the hogs. However, the 

customer still attempted lo remove one of the hogs from the trail'er by pulling on 

the right ear of the hog forapproximately 2-3 seconds causing it to move 

approximately one fool forward close to the ledge ofthe trailer. The hog did not 

show any sign of distress and jumped down from the trailer onto the floor of the 

holding pen, which is approximately 6 inches off the ground. After the incident 

with the customer and all the hogs were safely moved into the holding pen, 

Miguel Anducho, plant manager of the slaughter floor. and his (b) (6) ' discussed with the customer a second time that the customer should not be 

handling the animals while offloading into the holding pens. ILwas discussed 

with establishment that once a vehicle carrying livestock enters, oris in line to 

enter. an official slaughter establishment's premises. the vehicle is a part ofthat 

establishment's premises. The animals within that vehicle are to be handled ,In 

accordance with 9CFR313.2 and required to minimize excitement, discomfort. 

or accidental injury. The establishment recently submitted a draft.oftheir robust 

sy,stematic approach to USDA on 2/18/2021. I would recommend evaluating 

this situation to see ifthere is notification. education, orimprovement that the 

estabLishment could implement to address this vulnerability 1n the program. IPP 

recognizes the establishment's prompt action before and aft.er to try-to prevent 

the situation from occurring. 

M2444 Strauss Braf]ds LLC VFG0707014 21JAN2021 04C02 Livestock. Finalized StraussAttendees:(b) (6) ;(b) (6} 

921G {iumane ; Juan Ruelas. Plant Manager USDAAttendees:(b) (6) 

Handling This ls a summary ofwhat was discussed on 

1/18/2021 outside ofthe barn at approximately 10:30 am and in the foyer at 

approximately 10:50 am. The electric stunner was tagged "US Rejected" by "''" 

at approximately 10:24 am on 1/18/2021 on 

1 suspicion that a ewe had returned to consciousness during bleed out.1

' '" 

consulted by phone wlth (b) (6) . about 

the possible return to consciousness. It was decided that it could not be. 

confirmed with 100% confidence that the ewe had returned to consciousness. 

USDA removedthe tag at approximatery 10:50 am. (b) (6) 

dlscussed some issues with the plant personnel. The. stun to sticktime is still 

very long, averaging sixteen to sometimes greater than twenty seconds. as"'11"

1 

, had originally explained during the humane 

handling audit on 1/8/2021. Additionally, FSIS in-plant personnel are concerned 

that there have been some instances where the electric stunner has not 

reached at least 1.0 amps. (b) (6) explained to plant personnel 

that F515 cannot regulate the number of amps. However. a weaker stun 

combined with a long stun to stick time may make a return to consciousness 

(Tlore probable. Plant personnel responded that they are going to have a 

ineeting on 1/19/2021 where they will work through these issues. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 8 

Task 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M2444 Strauss Brands LLC 29JAN2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized Summary of Humane Handling Vulnerabilities from the week of01/25/2021 1. 

329G 

VFG0611010 

Humane On Wednesday, 1127/2021, there was no "trained management personnel in 

Handling the restraining and stunning area" as indicated in the verification plan for lambs 

durinq unloading ofthe second truck for approximately the first 50 head. Mrs• 

pointed this outto (b) (6) ,who 

responded that (b) (6) ,was around the corner by the start 

of the second lamb rail (after the inversion step). (b) (6) stopped the 

antemortem inspection that she was performing to verify that(b) (6) w_as there. 

buthe was not. The location of the s.econd lamb rail does not provide direct line 

of siqht to the stunninq area, The establishmentchose to have(b) (6) , stationed in the restraining and stunning 

area while Alanna was unloading the lambs. tf the establishment wishes to have 

(b) (6) fill in at the stunning position, documentation showing that he has had 

equivalent humane handling training as management needs to be provided. The 

importance of having someone in the restraining and stunning areawas 

discussed previously with the establishment in MOI VFG0614010321:I where il 

was recorded that (b) (6) . would be present while Alanna 

is unloading trucks. 2. At approximately 11:20 am on 1127/2021, (b) (6) 

, spoke with (b) (6) , and 

suggested that(b) (6) observe the placement ofthe electrodes on the lamb and 

make sure that it meets the manufacturer's recommendations because 

infrequently, the placement looked off-center cbmpared to general 

recommendations for head-only lamb electric stunning. 

M2444 Strauss Brands LLC VFG2508023 05FEB2021 04C02 Livestock Ffnallzed (b) (6) did notreceive any humane handlrng training for the few lamb slaughter 

805G Humane shiftslhathe worked as rear-leg shackler ,3nd hoist operator. Lambs are 

Handling stunned. released from the conveyor, slid down an open-sided chute, stuck with 

a Halal cut, and then shackled and hoisted off the s lide. The limefrom stun to 

stick is 9-1 O seconds and the employee. in the shackling ·position has a view of 

both stunning and sticking. The verificatron plan states that the establishment 

will "verify ail pertinent employees (barn employees and outside contract 

sticking employee) aretrained on Assessing Insensibility ofStunned Animals.'' 

The employee thattook(b) (6) place has received insensibllity training. The 

establishment was notified that this will be documented in a HumaneHandling 

(',101 in relation to their verification plan. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 9 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M2460+P246 

0 

Cimpl's. lhc. PMB3809015 

727G 

27JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized At approximately 0900 hours, while performing HATS task category II Truck 

Unloading, I observed a Coover/Hinken trucking semi back jnto the unloading 

chute. I observed in the back compartment 4 mature Holstein cows in a 

recumbent position. A barn employee arrived and performed a walk around the 

trailer and informed the driver of the downed animals and that he would have to 

leave the property and return when the cows are all standing. After the tri.Jck 

left, I asked (b) (6) , how many animals were on this load. 

(b) (6) informed me that there were 41 head ofmature Holstein rnws on 

the load and that there were only supposed to be 38 scheduled from that 

producer. I informed (b} (6) , ofmy 

observations and informed him that I would be issuing an MOL At approximately 

1050 hours the same tri.Jck arrived back at the truck unloading area. At this 

lime, I observed 1 ariima.l in a recumbent position with another animal straddling 

rt. (b) (6) the load and the driver was instructed td proceed to the 

North Barn location to unload some ofthe animals and return with a partial load. 

(b) (6) informed me thatthe (b) (6) 

discussed his concerns ofovercrowding the trailer with the driver. All cattle 

were unloaded at the North Barn and none were hauled back to U1e 

establishment 

M2460+P246 

0 

Ompl's, Inc, PMB0809013 

429G 

29JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Ffnallzed On 1/29/2021 at approximately 0730 hours, while performing HATS task 

category VIII Stunnfng Effectiveness I observed a matureAngus bull enter the 

stunning area. The senior stunning employee restrained the animals head, 

performed the initial stun with the pneumatic captive boll touched the eye (with 

no corneal reflex), and apply the secondary stun with the pneumatic captive 

bolt I noted that the eyes did not have the normal appearance of a properly 

stunned animal. I observed the animal being shackled, hoisted and placed onto 

the production line. I performed HATS task category IX Return to 

Consdousness as the animal was moved to the stick1ng station, I noted that the 

animals head and neck were stiff and slightly raised in line with the spine but 

was not actively righting itself. After the sticking procedure was performed on 

the animal and the employee removed the front legs, I observed 3 distinct 

(11ovements of the eyelid, movement ofthe nose and s[des ofthe animal lhat 

appeared to be breathinci movements. I informed (b ) (6) 

who was in the stunnin.9 area performing a 

stunnihg audit of tnY observations. (b) (6) retrieved the handheld captive 

bolt stunner and performed a poll stun on the animal to ensure tnsensibility. '"' ("' 

arrived to the stunning area and I informed him of my 

observations. A regulatoiy control action was taken by placing U.S. Retalned 

tag #B38174343 at the stunning area. After a discussion with(b ) (6) 

and (b) (6) itwas decided that since there was no 

corneal reflex, no active eye tracking, no vocalization and no act)ve righting 

reflex that there were no conclusive si.gns ofreturn to consciousness. Since 

therewas no return to consciousness'there is no non-compliance. The retained 

tag was removed from the restra1ner at approximately 0744hours and normal 

operatfons resumed. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 10 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M2460+P246 

0 

Cimpl's. Inc. PMB0610022 

618G 

18FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 2/17/2021,at approximately 1405 hours. While performinq HATStask 

category Ill Waterand Feed Availability. I (b) {6) observed a 

Hereford cow being driven out ofthe shackling area and placed into pen 7. As 

the animal was driven into pen 7, I observed the animal limping and holding it's 

right front leg up.The animal was clearly .ag.itated and spinning around in the 

pen. As I approached the pen I observed a heavy flow of blood from the 

animals rightfront hoof. Upon closer observation I noticed that the outside half 

of the animals right front hoof was missinq and bleeding heavily. I instructed a 

barn employee to contact(b) (6) and have him come to the 

area immediately. When (b) (6) arrived I informed him of the observation. 

(b) (6) (via the companies 2-way radio) called other barn employe~s to 

immediately retrieve the euthanasia equipment and come to the area. t• '' 

also called for(b) (6) to come to 

the area as well. Upon (b) (6) arrival he was also informed ofthe findino. 

The animal was successfully euthani2ed via gunshot& captive boll(b) (6) 

Informed me that he would investiqo1te as to how this occ urred and inform me of 

his findings.After investigation (b) {6) informed me that the floorofthe 

knock-box was raised too high (causing a pinch point in the right front comer) 

ofknock box. He also informed me that ma.intenance installed a stop on the lift 

cylinder for the floor ofthe knock-box to preventthe floor from raising too high 

and separating from the right front wall causing the pinch point 

M2743S+P27 

43S+V274JS 

TheCut Custom Processing LLC ROP4006012 

507G 

07JAN2021 Ffnall2ed NR Status; Thereis one open NR. Are there anyPlant Tests that have been 

returned Positive? One positive Lm lest. FSIS Samples: There are no USDA 

samples to schedule for January. Plant samplin!)/testlng: Plant Listeria testing 

after intensffied cleaning dated 1 /5/21 Neg. for Lm spp. Carcass Intervention 

(before and after) dated 12/3/2020 acceptable; Thermometercalibrations 

dated 01/04/2021 Acceptable, Water Tests dated 7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 

Were acceptable. New Directives/Notices; Notice 02-21 AVAILABILITY OF 

GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON DONATING PRODUCT AND RESPONDING TC 

CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. Sanitation Concerns: Continue to address actions 

needed on open.SPS NR. Scheduling (OT. Hol1daysarid Dark Days): None 

Results of Reviews (custom. odd hour, FSA); Custom Rev1ew dated 2/26/2020 

acceptable. Plant Discussion; There is one open NR: SPS Verification NR 

dated 9/29/202.0. Notice 02-21 AVAILABILITY OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS 

ON DONATING PRODUCT AND RESPONDING TO CUSTOMER COMPLAINl~ 

Thursday, January 7th is week 6 of theSuspensfon. All cattle on this date are 

to be slaughtered custom and stamped NOT FOR SALE. In response to Mr. 

Regers's question as towhethe~he would be requlred to conflnue usil"\g the 

captive boltcartridge selection log after the suspenston has been lifted, no heis 

notrequired to continue using it but he should consider the benefits of using it 

or al least using It.occasionally. Mr. Reger sent in the second water sample for 

this calendar year, results.were acceptable. Test results for Lm spp./Lm 

monocytogenes after they performed a deep clean and sanitized all food 

contact surfaces and associated areas was Neg. Mr. Reger also sent in a 

Ground BeefSample forShlgo1 Toxin-Produdng Escherichia coli which also 

returned a Neg. result. Attendees; Thad Reger. NOTE: Portions of the above 

minutes may have.been discussed lnterrnittently throughout the week 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 11 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M27435+P27 The Cut Custom Processing I.LC ROP5712012 14JAN2021 Finalized NR Status: There is one open NR. Are there any PlantTests that have been 

43S+V27435 714G returned Positive? One positive Lm test which has been followed up on. New 

swab tests were Neg. for l spp. FSIS Samples: There are no USDA samples to 

schedule for January. Plant sampling/testing; PlantListeria testing after 

intensified cleaning dated 1/5/21 Neg,. for Listeria spp. Carcass Intervention 

(before and after) dated 12/312020 acceptable; Thermometer calibrations 

dated 01/04/2.021 Acceptable. Water Tests dated 7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 

were acceptable. New Directives/Notices; Nolice·02-21 AVAILABILITY OF 

GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON DONATING PRODUCT AND RESPONDING TC 

CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. Sanitation Concerns: Continue to address actions 

needed on open SPS NR. Scheduling (OT. Holidays and Dark Days); Monday, 

January 18th is a Federal Holiday, this plant is notworking that day. Results of 

Reviews (custom. odd hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 2/26/2020 acceptable. 

Plant Discussion; There is one open NR: SPS Verification NR dated 

9/29/2020. We will go through all the points in this NR nextweek and do a 

walk-through of the plant to see whatneeds to be done to close this out. 

Thursday, January 14th is week 7 ofthe HumaneHandling Suspension. All 

cattle on,this date were slaughtered USDA (b) (6) was present for the 

slaughter and all stunning on the cattle wentwell. This was a 30 day evaluation 

for Humane Handling by(b ) (6) . It will be followed by a 60 and 90 day 

evaluation. Seven cattle were successfully slaughtered with no deviations on this 

date. K1S Test or\Beef# B014.03 and B014-04 Tested Neg. KIS Teston 

Beef#B014..Q6 and B014-07 waiting for KIS test results. . Attendees; Thad 

Reger. NOTE: Portions ofthe above minutes may have been discussed 

intermittentfy·throughout the week. 

M2743S+P27 The Cut Custom Processing LLC ROP1606012 22JAN2021 Finallzed NR Status; There is one open NR.Are there any Plant Tests that have been 

43S+V27435 722G returned Positive? None FSIS Samples: There are no USDA samples to 

schedulefor January.Plant sampllng/testfng; Plant Listeria testing 1/19121 

Negative. Carcass Intervention (before aod after) dated 1213/2020 acceptable; 

Thermometer calibrations dated 01/19/2021 Acceptable. Water Tests dated 

7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 were acceptable. New Directives/Notices; 

None.Sanitation Concerns: Contlnue to address actions needed on open SPS 

NR.Scheduling (OT, Holidays and Dark Days); NoneResults of Reviews 

(custom, odd hour. FSA): Custom Review dated 2126/2020 acceptable.Plant 

Discussion: There is one open NR:SPS Verificatfon NR dated 9/29/2020. After 

gotng through the plant to see what needed to be addressed ln the NR there 

were two mTnor areas that needed attention. Mr. Reger stated he has the 

stainless steel to fix the noted area and wlll address it along with the two plugs 

on the frame ofthe chill cooler.Thursday. January 14th marks week 8 of the 

Humane Handling Suspension. All cattle on this date were slaughtered USDA. 

Thirteen cattle and one goat were successfully slaughtered with no deviations 

on this date. There were no custom animals slaughtered this week. The Captive 

Bolt Cartridge SelectiQn Log was appropriately documented during antemortem 

1/21121. Justification for the cartridge. used per animal was per discussion 

between the Pfant Manager Thad Reger and (b) (6) 

during antemortem.KIS Test on Beef# B014-06 and 8014-07 from last week 

was Neg.Attendees; Thad Reger.NOTE: Portions of the above minutes may 

have been discussed intermittently throughout the week, 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 12 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M2743S+P27 The Cut Cu.stom Processing I.LC ROP1313012 28JAN2021 Finalized NR Status: There is one open NR. Are there any PlantTests that have been 

43S+V27435 828G returned Positive? None FSIS Samples: The MT-60, MT 60 Cloth sample and 

MT-43 USDA sample (ground beef) are scheduled for Tuesday February 5th. 

Plant sampling/testing; Plant Listeria testing 1/19/21 Negative. Carcass 

Intervention (before and after) dated 12/3/2020 acceptable, new swab was 

taken today, 1/28/21 : Thermometer calibrations dated 01'/25/2021 Acceptable, 

WaterTests dated' 7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 were acceptable(coliforms and 

Nitrates were among the test results), New Directives/Notices; Nonce 69'20 

IN-FIELD STUDY TO TEST A NEW SAMPLE COLLECTION METHOD FOR 

BEEF MANUFACTURING TRIMMINGS. FSIS Notice 05-21 Quarterly 

Establishment Information Letters.Sanitation Concerns: Keep processing room 

floor picked up of debris (fat etc.). Scheduling (OT, Holidays and Dark Days); 

None Results of Reviews (custom, odd hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 

2/26/2020 acceptable. Rlant Discussion; There is one open NR: SP'S 

Verification NR dated 9/29/2020. After going through 1he plant to see what 

needed to be addressed in the NR there were two minor areas that needed 

attention.(b) (6) staled hehas the stainless steel to fix the noted area and 

will address italong with the two plugs on the frame of the chill cooler. The 

QUARTERLY ESTABLISHMENT INFORMATION LETTERS have posted and 

have been received by this establishment.Notice 69-20 IN-FIELD STUDY TO 

TESTA NEW SAMPLE COLLECTION METHOD FOR BEEF 

MANUFACTURING TRIMMINGS.Cloth samples will be analy.zed for Salmonella 

and indicator organisms only. FSIS is focusing its surface sampling analysis on 

Salmonella and indicators during the in-field study. The tradi1ional MT60 sample 

will be analyzed for Shiga,,toxin producing E.coli (STEC), Salmonella, and 

indicator organisms. STEC testing of the MT60 sample requires establishments 

to hold product unlll test results are available. This sample is scheduled for 

Tuesday 1/2. Cloth sampling and how it would be performed along with the 

conventional MT-60 were discussed with Mr. Reger. Thursday, January 28th 

marks week 9 of the Humane Hahdling Suspension. All cattle on this date were 

slaughtered USDA. Ten cattle were successfully slaughtered with no deviations 

on this date. There were no custom animals slaughtered this week. The Captive 

BollCartridge Selection log was appropriately documented during antemortem 

1/28/21. Justification forthe cartridqe used peranimal discussion included 

Plant Manager Thad Reger, (b) (6) and was monitored 

by(b ) (6) . Attendees;ThadReger. NOTE: Portions ofthe above minutes 

may have been discussed interm1ttently throughout the week. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 13 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status M OI Agenda 

M2743S+P27 The Cut Cu.stom Processing I.LC ROP2807020 0SFEB2021 Finalized NR Status: There are no open NR's. Are there any Plant Tests that have been 

435+V27435 905G returned Positive? None FSIS Samples: There is an MT-60, and an MT 60 

Cloth sample, and a MT-43 USDA sample (ground beef) scheduled for Friday 

February 12th. Plant sampling/testing; Plant Listeria testing i/19/21 Negative. 

Carcass Intervention (before and after) dated 12/3/2020 acceptable, new :swab 

was ta~en 1 /28/21 waiting for test results ~ Thermometer calibrations dated 

02/02/2021 Acceptable, WaterTests dated 7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 were 

acceptable(coltforms and Nitrates were among the test results), New 

Directives/Notices; None. Sanitation Concerns: Keep processing room Hoar 

picked up ofd'ebris (fat etc.). Soheduling (OT, Holidays and Dark Days); None 

Results of Reviews (custom, odd hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 2/03/2021 

acceptable. PlantDiscussion; There are no open NR's. Thursday, February 

4th marks week 10of the Humane Handling Suspension. All cattle on this date 

were slaughtered USDA. Twelve cattte were successfu)ly slaughtered with no 

deviations on this date. There were no custom animals slaughtered this week. 

The Captive Bolt Cartridge Selection Log was appropriately documented during 

antemortem 2/4121, Justification for the cartridqe used per animal discussion 

included Plant ManaqerThad Reger, (b) (6) and was 

monitored by (b) (6) . Discussed segregation of Suspect animals during 

antemortem. Suspect pens may require more Jight because these are p laces 

where animals are more closely examined during inspection. The establishment 

must provide adequate areas for holding animals thatare suspect Section 

309.2 (p) provides for occasions when the establishment requests and receives 

permission to 'hold a11 animal fortreatment in an effortto improve the animal's 

condition to the pointthat itmay become eligible for slaughter. Another 

possibility is that the establishment may request and receive permission to have 

an ·animal treated off-premises, such as ata local veterinary clinic. These 

animals mustalso be kept in an identified pen until they are picked up for 

treatmenl Non-ambulatory disabled cattlecannot be set aside for treatment 

either on or off establishment premises. These are unusual occasions and there 

?re further instructions Involved ifthis issue should arise. Attendees; Thad 

Reger. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 14 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M27435+P27 The Cut Custom Processing LLC ROP1606023 12FEB2021 Finalized NR Status: There are no open NR's. Are there any Plant Tests that have been 

435+V27435 112G returned Positive? None FSJS Samples: There is an MT-60, and an MT 60 

Cloth USDA sample scheduled fortoday, Friday February 12th. There is an 

MT-43 (ground beef) sample scheduled tor Monday February 22nd. Plant 

samplingitesting; Plant Listeria testing 2/09/21 Negative. Carcass Intervention 

(before and after) dated 2/5/2021 acceptable, Thermometer calibrations dated 

02/08/2021 Acceptable, WaterTests dated 7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 were 

acceptable(colrforms and Nitrates were among the test results), New 

Directives/Notices; None. Sanitation Concerns: Keep processing room Hoar 

picked up ofd'ebris and waterpuddllng addressed. Scheduling (OT, Holidays 

and Dark Days); Monday February 15th is a Federal Holiday. This plant will not 

be conducting any USDA activities that day. Results ofReviews (custom, .odd 

hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 2/03/2021 acceptable. Plant Discussion; 

There are no open NR' s. Thursday, February 11th marks week 11 of the 

Humane Handling Suspension. Seven cattle were successfully slauqhtered 

USDAinspectedandweremonitoredby(b) (6) ,(b) (6) or(b) (6) with 

no deviations on this date. There were 6 custom cattle slaughtered this day 

a.Isa. The Captive BoJt Cartridge Selection Log was appropriately documented 

during antemortem 2/11/21. Justification for the cartridge used per anima.1 

discussion included PlantManaqer Thad Reqer, Stunning Operator Ethan 

Reger and was monitored by (b) (6) was at The CutWednesday 

February 10th to conduct the 90..day conditional grant review. As there was a 

time restraint on evaluating the plants documentation that day, (b) (6) will be 

back again on Wednesday February 17th to try to finish the evaluation. 

Discussion with Mr. Reger concerning purchasing of hog dehairer, cure 

injector and smokehouse as an addition to the. plant. Attendees; (b) (6) 

NOTE: Portions ofthe above minutes may have been discussed intermittenUy 

throughout the week. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 15 

Task 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date Code TaskName Status M OI Agenda 

M27435+P27 The Cut Cu.stem Processing I.LC ROP4906022 19FEB2021 Finalized NR Stat;us: There are no open NR's. Are there any Plant Tests thathave been 

435+V27435 319G returned Positive? None FSIS Samples: There was an MT•60, and an MT 60 

Cloth USDA sample taken Friday FebruarY 12th which tested Neg. There is an 

MT-43 (ground beef) sample scheduled for Monday February 22nd. Plant 

sampling/testing; Plant Listeria testing 2/09/21 Negative. Carcass lntervention 

(before and after) dated 2/5/2021 acceptable, Thermometer calibrations dated 

02/15/2021 Acceptable, WaterTests dated 7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 were 

acceptable(colrforms and Nitrates were among the test results), New 

Directives/Notices; None. Sanitation Concerns: Keep processing room Ooor 

picked up ofdebris and waterpuddling addressed: Scheduling (OT, Holidays 

and Dark Days); None Results of Reviews (custom, odd hour. FSA): Custom 

Review dated 2/03/2021 acceptable. Plant Discussion: There are no open 

NR's. Thursday. FebruarY 18th marks week 12 of the Humane Handling 

Suspension. Eightcattle were successfully slaughtered USDA inspected and 

were monitored by (b) (6) with no deviations on this date. The Captive Bolt 

Cartridge Selection Log was appropriately documented during antemortem 

2/18/21. Justification forthe cartridQe used per animal discussion included 

PlantManaget'Thad Reger, (b} (6) and was monitored 

by (b) (6} .(b) {6) wasagainalTheCutWednesdayFebruarY 17thto 

finish conducting the 90-day conditional grant review. All plans will be reviewed 

again after the notated areas, which were tagged, are corrected. Discussion 

with Mr. Reger concerning monitoring and verification activities. Attendees; 

Thad Reger. NOTE: Portions ofthe above minutes may have been discussed 

intermitten!ly throughout the week. 

M27435+P27 The Cut Custom Processing LLC ROP5111024 26FEB2021 Finalized NR Status: There are no opeh NR's,Are there any Plant Tests t))at have beeti 

435+V27435 926G returned Positive.? None FSlS Samples: There was an MT·60. and an MT 60 

Cloth USDA sample taken Friday FebrUarY 12th Which tested Neg. There was 

an MT•43 (ground beef) sample taken Monday February 22nd which tested 

Neg. Plant sampling/testing; Plant Listeria testing 2/09/21 Negative. Carcass 

Intervention (before and after) dated 2/5/2021 acceptable. Thermometer 

calibrations dated 02/23/2021 Acceptable. Water Tests dated 7728/2020 and 

12/22/2020 we.re acceptable( coliforms and Nitrates were among the test 

results). New Directives/Notices; FSIS Directive 7120.1 Rev. 55 Safe and 

Sunable tngredients Used in the Production of Meat Poul[rY and Egg Products 

Sanitation Concerns:: None Scheduling (OT. Holidays and' Dark Days): None 

Results of Reviews (custom. odd hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 2/03/2021 

acceptable. Plant Discussion: There are no open NR' s. Thursday, FebruarY 

25th marked week 13 of the Humal'!e Handling Suspension. Fourteen cattle 

Were successfully slaughtered USDA inspected and were monitored by1

" ' ' 

with no deviations on this date. The Captfve Bolt Cartridge Selection Log 

Was approprrately documented during antemortem 2/25121. Just1fication for the 

cartridgeused per animal was ascertained by Plant Manager Thad Reger, and 

Was monitored by (b) (6} . I condu~ted a quarterly odd hour inspection ofthe 

pens and animals thfs morning 2/26/21 and found no issues. Plant Manager 

Thad Reger accompanied me during this inspection. There was no icing in the 

alleys or pens but Ifthere were, it would have to be addressed. The same 

applies if the watering devices were frozen. Dfscussion with Mr. Reger 

concerning monitoring and verification activities. Attendees: Thad Reger. 

NOT,E: Portions ofthe above minutes may have. been discussed il']termittently 

throughout the week. 

61 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 16 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M27435+P27 

43S+V27435 

The Cut Custom Processing I.LC ROP2113034 

405G 

0SMAR2021 Finalized NR Status: There are no open NR's. Are there any Plant Tests that have been 

returned Positive? None FSIS Samples: There is a RTE sample to schedule 

this month. Plant sampling/testing; Plant Listeria testing 2/09/21 Negative. 

Carcass Intervention (before and after) dated 2/5/2021 acceptable. 

Thermometer calibrations dated 03/01/2021 Acceptable, Water Tests dated 

7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 were acceptable(coliforms and Nitrates were among 

the test results), New Directives/Notices; Directive 8140.1 Rev. 2 Notice of 

Receipt or Distribution of Adulterated Product Sanitation Concerns: None 

Scheduling (OT. Holidays and Dark Days); None Results ot Reviews (custom, 

odd hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 2/03/2021 acceptable. Plant Discussion; 

There are t10 open NR's. Thursday, March 4th marked week 14of the Humane 

Handling Suspension. Seven cattle were successfully slaughtered USDA 

inspected and were monitored by(b) (6) with nodeviations on this date. The 

Captive BollCartridge Selection Log was appropriately documented during 

antemortem 3/4/21, Justification for the cartridge used peranimal was 

a_scertained by Plant Manager Thad Reger and was monitored by (b) (6) . There were two custom cattle also slaughtered this date. Directive 8140.1 Rev. 

2 Notice otReceipt or Distribution of Adulterated Product is not to be 

implemented until March 1st, 2021. The regulatory requirements for 

establ.ishments lo notify FSIS when they have shipped orreceived adulterated 

or misbranded products are unchanged; however, the logistics ofFSIS 

receiving and reporting the notifi<;:ation and documenting·Agency assessment 

and establishment corrective actions have been updated and incorporated into 

this directive. Attendees; Thad Reger. NOTE: Portions ofthe above minutes 

may have been discussed intermittently throughout the week. 

M27435+P27 

43S+V27435 

The Cut Custom Processing LLC ROP3813032 

712G. 

12MAR2021 Finalized NR Status; There are no open NR's. Are there any Plant Tests that have been 

returned Positive? None FSIS Samples: There is a RTE sample to take 

Monday, March 15th. Plant sampling/testing; Plant Listeria testing 2/09/21 

Negative. Carcass Intervention (before a[ld after) dated 215/2021 acceptable, 

Thermometer calibrations dated 03/8/2021 Acceptable. Water Tests dated 

7/28/2020 and 12/22/2.020 were acceptable(coliforms and Nitrates were among 

the test results), NewD1rectives/Notices; Directive 7320. 1 Rev. 2 Prevention 

and Control of Trichinella in Domestic Pork Products Sanitation Concerns: 

None Scheduling (OT, Holidays and Dark Days); None Results of Revlews 

(custom, odd hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 2/03/2021 acceptable. Plant 

Discussion; Thereare no open NR's. Thursday, March 11th marked week 15 

ofthe Humane Handling Suspension. Ten cattle were successfully siaughtered 

~SDAinspected and we.re monitored by jb) (6) with no deviations on this 

date. The Captive Bolt Cartridge Selection Log was appropriatelydocumented 

during antemortem 3/11 /21. Justification for the cartrid9e used per animal was 

ascertafned by Ptan! Manager Thad Reger and was monitored by (b} (6) . There were twoJambs also slaughtered this date with no stunning deviations.'"' •· 

was present for todays' slaughter and witnessed no deviations during the 

stunning process. Review of Directive 7320.1 Rev. 2 Prevention and Control of 

Trichinella in Domestlc Pork Products. Attendees; Thad Reger. NOTE: Portions 

ofthe above minutes may have been discussed intennittently throughout the 

week. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 17 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M27435+P27 

435+V27435 

The Cut Custom Processing LLC ROP5705030 

419G 

19MAR2021 Finalized NR Status: There are no open NR's. Are there any Plant Tests that have been 

returned Positive? None FSIS Samples: There was a RTE sample taken 

Monday, March 15th which tested Neg. Plant sampling/testing; Plant Listeria 

testing 2/09/21 Negative. Carcass Intervention (before and after) dated 

2/5/2021 acceptable. Thermometer calibrations dated 03/15/2021 Acceptable, 

Water Tests dated 7/28/2020 and 12/22/2020 were acceptable(coliforms and 

Nitrates were among the test results), New Directives/Notices; Directive 7320.1 

Rev. 2 Prevention and Control ofTrichinella in Domestic Pork Products 

Sanitation Concerns: None Scheduling (OT, Holidays and Dark Days): None 

Results of Reviews (custom, odd hour, FSA): Custom Review dated 2/03/2021 

acceptable. Plant Discussion; There are no open NR's. Humane handling 

suspension has been lifted.Safety Data Sheet was reviewed and one addition 

was made for Spartan brand cleaning agent "Inspectors Choice UN 1760". 

Attendees; Thad Reger. NOTE: Portions of the above minutes may have been 

discussed intermittently throughout the week. 

M2926 Pork King Packing, Inc. ODK5815025 

213G 

13FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized At about 2:30pm on 2/12/2021, I observed lot 61778 hogs for antemortem 

inspection. I noticed about half ofthe load had large areas of bright red to 

purple skin lesions on hams and shoulder areas with about one fourth of them 

extending to lumbar area and being severe. The temperatures that day were in 

the single digits and these lesions were consistent with frostbite. The amount 

and extent offrostbite was most evident on the slaughter floor where it could be 

observed very easily and many required trimming through to underlying 

muscle. I contacted Pork King QC and Pork King owner relaying my concerns 

that this load of hogs was not adequately protected due to inclement weather 

during shipping. Pork King management immediately followed up with the barn 

manager for his observations of the truck condition upon arrival and with the 

livestock supplier. Livestock barn manager noted this truck had not been 

adequately bedded for the extreme temperatures. The livestock supplier 

immediately investigated the truck conditions and trucking company and 

determined the truck was not adequately paneled and bedded. The livestock 

supplier sentcorrective actions statement stating that they will no longer allow 

the driver to haul pigs for them. They also stated that to prevent any other 

incidents from occurring, they will give all trucks loading exact bedding and 

panel procedures for cold weather. 

M34729 White Oak Pastures ZME1015031 

219G 

19MAR2021 Finalized Discussion with plant management about the revised humane handlingdirective 

6900.2, specifically section V which describes enforcement and documentation 

of non-compliances. We discussed what situation would warrant a regulatory 

control action (such as application of a tag) and what steps the plant would 

need to take to continue slaughter operations. A printed copy ofthe CFR 313 

was also provided to plant management. We also discussed antemortem and 

postmortem evaluation and CFR 309 and 310 as well as proper disposal of 

condemned carcasses outlined in CFR 311. Printed copies were provided. 

M3D Swift Beef Company MXE1609020 

122G 

22FEB2021 Open Receiving cattle on Sunday as notified by establishment. Documented in HATS 

module of Humane Handling task: no issues. Instructed by supervisors to create 

MOI. Cattle were in pens 15-19/20 and alley-#8 when I inspected pens at 

1230-1240 on 2/21/21. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 18 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status M OI Agenda 

M40110 Midwest Research Swine. LLC FVO507021 

812G 

12FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized At approximately 07:15 on Thursday 2-11-2021 While(b) (6) was doing a 

humane handling audit, she observed the following incident. There was 2" X 3" 

hole in the flooring of the knock box and while a hog was being brought into the 

knock box it got its foot caught initand would notgo any farther. Phil Schwarz.e 

and Matt Wendt who were the 2 plantemployees working in that area realized 

the hog would no longer go into the knook box and used the captive bolt to 

humanely euthanize the hog. Thestunning attempt was successful on the first 

(1y and the hog was bled out After the hog was removed from the 'knock box 

and hung on the rail Todd Selle another plant employee came and replaced the 

broken flooring priorto a.nother hog being brought'into the knock box. It is 

recommended that when a piece ofthe flooring breaks tn the knock box that it 

is immediately replaced to prevent this incident from happening again. 

M44801+P44 Halal Transaction of USA, LLC. XJWS01303 02MAR2021 04C02 Livestock. Finalfzed Animals were delivered on 02/26. Upon arrival 5 animals died 

801 3102G Humane 

Handling 

M44824+V44 

824 

Western MeatProcessing, Inc. XTB3515032 

503G 

03MAR2021 Finalized A meeting was held on 3/3/21 at 1203 hours atEstablishment M44824, Western 

MeatProcessing, to discuss the Humane Handling incident that occurred on 

Tuesday, March 2, 2021. Establishment Attendees: (b) (6) 

;(b) (6) USDAAttendees: (b) (6) 

;{b) l6) On Tuesday March 2, 2021, at 

approximately 1120 hours, I, (b) (6) , observed the 

following humane handling incident during trailer unloading. I was standing in 

the alleyway watching a trailer being unloaded, monitoring HATS Category II 

{Truck Unloading). After unloading a few dairy cows from thebacl< 

compartment ofthe trailer, the hauler opened the divider inside the trailer, and 

then stepped off the trailer and pushed the trailer door open. The trailerdoor 

swung open towards a plant employee that was standing outside the trailer on 

the opposite sjde from the hauler. Approximately 15jersey heifers started 

coming offthe trailerand then the trailer door started to swing back towards the 

heifers. The trailer door swung into the side of one of the jersey heifers as she 

was coming offof the trailer. I did not observe any lameness, or any other sign 

of injury or distress. I then informed ( b) ( 6) . ofmy 

observation. Trailer unfoading must be done with a minimum ofexcitement and 

discomfort to the animals, in accordance with 9 CFR 313.2(a). I inquired with 

the establishment as to what preventative or corrective actions they have taken 

or will take to prevent this from happening aqain. Theestablishment responded 

that (b) (6) and (b} (6) 

had a discussion with the employee on 3/2/21 . The meeting was adjourned at 

1206 hours. This MOI includes all ofthe information discussed during the 

meeting. Respectfully, (b) (6) 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 19 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M45856+V45 

856 

Hylife Foods Windom, LLC OD80913014 

714G 

14JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized 01/12/2021 At approximately 0700 hours, while returning tram performing 

antemortem examination (HATS Category IV), I observed 2 gasping hogs on 

the bleed chain just after the stick station and one gasping hog being stuck at 

the stick station (HATS Category IX - Return to Consciousness). There Was a 

single shackler and a single slicker in the location. I motioned for the sticker to 

stop the line and stun the hogs with the hand-held captive bolt ciun. The stic;ker 

did not understand but stopped the line. I then motioned to the (b) (4) operator 

and 'instructed him to stun the hogs which he did. Barn Manager, Ms. Kristina 

Mohr, observed my movements and came over. I told herthere were gasping 

hogs on the line going through the stick station and being stuck without 

receivinqa security stun. She contacted maintenance and (b) (6) 

, and summoned them to the location. The 

(b) (4) operator. emptied the(b) (4) and all gasping hogs were stunned with the 

hand-held captive bolt gun. Maintenance arrived to trouble-shoot the machine. 

They drained the chamber of CO2, refilled the chamber, and ran empty 

elevators to mix theQas. After speaking with maintenance, Ms. Mohrreported 

the issue was the (b) (4) sat'idle prior to production and the gas may not have 

been mixed well. Maintenance believed they had solved the issue. She also 

noted that there was supposed to be a Sensibility Monitor prior to the stick 

station whose job itwas to check for possible return to sensibility and to stun 

i:iasprng hogs, howeverhe was not present. The Sensibility Monitor arrived, the 

(b) (4) was ready; hog loading commenced. I stayed to observe hogs coming 

out of the (b) (4) . However, some hogs exiting the(b) (4) were observed 

gaspinQ. I asked for them to be addressed. At that time, (b) ( 6) , had arrived at ourlocation and was watching hogs with me. I 

asked him why they were not stunning these gasping hoqs and why were they 

being stuck without a security stun. I was informed by (b) (6) thatthe 

establishment would not be stunning every hog that came out of(b) (4) gasping. 

I informed (b) (6) that since none of the hogs regained consciousness 

before being stunned this_ situation did no constitute and NR but a Hum,;1ne 

Handlinq MOI would be written. I then met with (b) (6) and we met 

with (b) (6) to inform him of the observations. After 

discussing the situation with (b} (6) we went to the FSQA office and 

reviewed the establishment's Humane Handling Program. (b) (6) approoiched 

us at this time to inform us that they would be security stunnfng gasping hogs 

before sticking and if any are found on the bleed chain those would be stunned 

as well. He also noted that the Butinas would be run empty for 15 

minutes before production lo ensure proper gas mixture prior to hogs entering. 

The dwell limeforthe(b) (4) had been increased from 120 seconds to 140 

seconds. I discussed with (b) (6) our findings in their humane handling 

program and that while gasping hogs are not considered conscious, it could be 

an indication that the animat could return to consciousness and therefore would 

warrant a security stun per their program. Not performing a security stun on 

gasping hogs represents a possible vulnerability in the establishments robust 

systematic humane handling approach. Al the weekly meeting which occurred 

later that night the company noted that they had increased the dwell time to 160 

seconds. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 20 

EstNbr EstName 

M45858 Puget Sound Processing, LLC 

M45945+P45 

945 

Home PlacePastures 

M46554+P46 

554 

AEE Inc. DB.A Emory's 

Processing 

MOINbr 

QSV4013010 

328G 

WLT4809034 

001G 

KRP4406023 

904G 

Date 

28JAN2021 

Task 

Code 

04C02 

TaskName 

Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

01MAR2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

04FEB2021 

- --· 

Status 

Finalized 

Finalized 

Finaliz,ed 

MOI Agenda 

Location; 219th Avenue SW. Centralia WA. Attendees;(b) (6) and 

(b) (66 .lssues,(b) (6) asked{b) (6) about the schedule next 

week,{ ) (6) stated that PSP will work Tuesday, Wednesday. and Thursday. 

(b) (6) asked about in house testing. (b) (6) stated that herquarterly n60 

will be done tomorrow. All otherquarterly sampling is finished. No otherissues. 

On February 23, 2021, (b) (6) and (b) (6) met with t) (6) conceminqlhe Robust Humane Handling Plan at Home Pl<)ce 

astures (M45945). (b) ( 6) requested to have hisRobust Humane 

Handling Plan reinstated. (b) (6) and {b) (6) have 

discussed the findings from previous visits and documentation and belleve 

M45945 Home Place.Pastures has ;m adequate and effective Robust Humane 

Handling plan in place at this time and recommend that itbe reinstated on 

March 1, 2021. 

This MOI is a clarification ofthe regulations that apply for Humane Handling 

during any ritual slaughter operations, Any establishment that slaughters 

animals is required to follow all parts of9 CFR 3132 Handling of livestock 

except 313.2(f) for those religious authorities thatdo not allow stunning priorto 

the ritual slaughtercut From discussions with (b) (6) , establishment 

M46554 will perform a stunning procedure with a captive bolt prtor to the (itual 

cut This is an acceptable ORtion as a humane intervention. The captive bolt 

stunning will still fall under all parts of 9 CFR 313.15 Mechanical; captive bolt. 

Ourinspectors will be verifying that itstunning methods are utilized thatthey 

are applied effectively. With or without the application of a stunning method, 

animals must be unconscious or insensible to pain prior to any dressing 

procedures such as head skinning, leg removal, ear removal, horn removal. or 

opening hide patterns. 

M46877+P46 Seven Hills Abattoir NOA5212032 05MAR2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized Met with Plant Manager Dalton Mosser on the kill floor today and discussed the 

877 905G Humane following: hydraulic head restraint on the head catch gate was notw0rking 

Handling properly, allowing the cattle to move their head more, which meant, taking 

longer to stun the animals and could possibly lead to a miss stun. Also not 

having a second functioning HHCB for use as a security knock. I also 

reiterated. that these small issues could potentially lead to NR's or possibly. if 

bad enou,gh could cause a suspension. 

Mr. Mosser informed me shortly after our conversation, 

that hehad spoke with their maintenance man to repair the hydraulic head 

restraint and that he was waiting on parts for their back up HHCB and that he 

intends on ordering a new HHCB as well. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 21 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M47040+P47 Indiana Halal Farms U:.C EYZ4013010 07JAN2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized The folJowing are the observations made during the. ritual slaughter of a large 

040 207G Humane 

Handling 

bull: On 1-06-2021 at approximately 0745 hours while performing a humane 

handltng during slaughtering atM47040, I observed the slaughter of a large 

Black Angus Bull placed in the knock box with the chin lift. The establishment 

employee performed the ritual halal cut of the throat and walked away at !hat 

time. The bull began vocalizing as ifitwere injured while still standing. I 

watched the bull's eyes as they continued to track and did notgo blank as other 

cattle before. After a few minutes I conducted a corneal reflex on the bull as it 

was still vocalizing, and'it was positive. Al the lime I tmmediately asked 

Mohamed Hosani, Plant Manager ifthe plant had a cap and boltto knock the 

animal and he responded that no they did not. Mr. Hosani then instructed the 

employee to perform an additional cut to the animal. The. employee 

administered another cut with the culling knife and the bull continued lo vocalize 

and track with its eyes. Mr. Hosani again instructed the employee to cut the 

throat more and the employee went on to administer three additional cuts in a 

sawing motion with a small 6-inch knife before the bull stopped vocalizing and 

the eyes stopped tracki•ng. The exemption for ritual slaughter requires u,atthe 

cut or cuts made to initiate exsanguination should be sufficient to result in 

unconsciousness due to blood loss. When the employee was observed to have 

made the Initial cut and walk away with the animal still conscious, my 

observations support thatthe. employee did not administer the initial cut 

sufficientto resull in unconsciousness by exsanguination. This was further 

supported by the instruction to the employee to administer multiple. additional 

cuts by the management lo achieve unconsciousness. These observations 

and the Agency's expectation regarding ritual slaughter were discussed with 

Mr. Hosani and ArefAlhag, Plant Owner. 

M47172 FBS Hudson GXP0415030 

929G 

29MAR2021 Finalized Weekly Memorandum of Interview Establishment #47172. FBS Hudson, LLC. 

In Attendance: (b) (6) : (b) (6) 

. NR's, Notices and Directives: N/A Date issueq: Status: SPS/SSOP: N/A 

{;AGCP; NIA Non-Food Safety/Labeling'. NIASampling: NIA Misceltaneous: "'"' 

, Witnessed the employment of beeftail twisting, whlle 

obsew1ngtverifying humane handling of bovine animals, recently presented for 

USDA slaughter activity. She submitted a question lo the Dlstrict Veterinary 

Medical Specialist tDVMS) for guidance. Here is the response by(b) (6) 

: "It basically comes down to howthe restraint is. used. Ifthe tall 

twisting/lifting causes stress/distress to the animal (vocalization. trying to climb 

over its mends to try and·get away, etc.) then We have grounds for a 

noncompl1ance. Ifthe tail twisting/lifting does not elicit a negative reaction or 

getsthe. animal l'O move without caus.fng stress, then it's just another means of 

stimulating an animal to move. Essentially. we evaluate il the sameway as a 

cattle prod, the way its applied and u,e reaction from the animal (to) determine 

compliance/non- compliance." Further humane handling guidance canbe 

found via referencing FSIS Directive 6900.2, HUMANE HANDLING AND 

SLAUGHTER OF LIVESTOCK. 

M47484+P47 

484 

The Durand Smokehouse·LLC SL04307032 

519G 

19MAR2021 Finalized Establishment owner Roy Elsenpeter and(b) ( 6) present.I 

Informed Roy that I did an odd hour humane handling inspection today. It is 

preform outside of operating hours and is not overtime charged to the 

establishment I told him that I did not find any noncompliance today. Roy did 

fnformed me that he is working on making a change to have a bettersystem for 

getting waterto the animals held ove.rnighLNo other issues at this time. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 22 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M482 SL Croix Abattoir NAA0409031 

524G 

24MAR2021 Open On March 24th, at approximately 10:10am. (b) (6) met with plant 

management. Including (b) (6) and (b) (6) to discuss 

the humane handling notations on the HACCP records on March 22, 2021, 

when one steer was slaughtered,(b ) (6) stated that she was present 

during the knocking and sticking on tl1e steer, and observed no humane 

handling concerns, such as the animal regaining consciousness. The sticking 

employee did take a bit more time to stick the animal, as the forelegs were 

moving. However, when reviewing the records for that day, the Sanitary 

Dressing report documents " Cattle was conscious for the sticking, and was 

movinq, making it difficult to do a firm sticking. {b\ (6) will do the sticking until 

(b) (6) has been retrained.'(b ) (6) stated thatsticking a conscious 

animal is an egregious (Very bad) n~mcompliance that could result in the plant 

being suspended by USDA, and it would need to be addressed by the 

estabLishmenL (b) (6) stated he was concerned because the animal kept 

moving its legs while the sticking employee was in front of it. (b) (6) 

explained that movement is not always a sign ofthe animal regaining 

consciousness. ( b ) ( 6) entered the conversation at that point and 

stated they need more experience with the cattle, and that it seemed the three 

cattle slaughtered this week"moved more than usual.'(b ) (6) also 

discussed the entry on the Sanitary Dressing record that shows-the 

"Unconsciousness (successful blink check)" was found to be deficient.lt>I '~ 

inquired that if the animal was blinking, why wouldn'tit be stunned 

again, per the firm's humane handling program. (b) (6) stated they 

were wrong in marking that section as deficient, because the animal didn't blink, 

but itwas moving around a lot, in heropinion. Movement, breathing, and 

vocalization signs were discussed. {b) (6) asked for further information 

on what corrective actions the establishmentwas taking to address the incident. 

(b) (6) stated the sticking employee will be retrained this week or next 

week, and then allowed to resume the sticking job. (b) (6) stated there are 

i nstructional videos and guidance on the FSIS website, ifthe establishment 

management needed further information on acceptable movement in effectively 

knocked animals. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 23 

Task 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M497S+P497 Dale T. Smith and Sons Meat IYCS111014 02JAN2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized MeetinqAttendeesUSDAFSIS-(b) (6) ,(b) (6) , 5 Packing Company Inc 202G Humane and (b) (6) EstablishmentManagement-(b) (6) and 

Handling VP ofOperations Bret Smith HATS Category VI On 12/31/20 atapproximately 

1518 hours,(b) (6) (b) (6)was performing livestock humane handling by 

observing the knock box activities, (b} (6) observed thefollowing humane 

handlinf) event A cow came into the knock box and started to move backward 

out of the knock box. Dennis Smith, who was driving cattle into the knock box, 

started applying the electric prod to hit the back-left rump area of the cow to 

drive it back into the knock box. He hit itat least three times in short bursts, 

causing the cow lo voc.alize.The application ofthe electric prod caused the 

cow to vocalize three times, each time following the application ofthe prod. 1b' 1•1 

immediately approached Dennis Smith and let him know about the 

situation. Per Directive 6900.2 Revision 3, ''Establishments are to use 

implements (e.g., electric prods. canvas slappers) as little as possible to 

minimize excitement and injury and are not to drive livestock faster than .a 

'10rmal walking speed. Any use ofsuch implements that, in the opinion of the 

inspector, is excessive is prohibited."! remind you of agency regulations 9 CFR 

313.2 (a) (l:i) and (c) that refer to electric prod usage. 9 CFR 313.2 (a) states 

that "Driving oflivestock from the unloading ramps to the holding pens and from 

the holding pens to the stunning area shall be done with a minimum of 

excitement and dlscomfort to the animals. Livestock shall not be forced to move 

faster than a normal wa.lking speed."9 CFR 313.2 (b) slates that "Electric prods, 

canvas slappers, or other implements employed to drive animals shall be used 

as little as possible in orderto minimize excitement and injury. Any use of such 

implements which. in the opinion of the inspector. is excessive, is prohibited. 

Electrical prods attached to AC house current shall be reduced by a 

transformer to the lowesteffective voltage not to exceed 50 volts AC."9 CFR 

313,2 (c) states that "Pipes, sharp or pointed objects, and other items which, in 

the opinion ofthe inspec.for, would cause injury or unnecessary pain to the 

animal shall not be used to drive livestock.." 

MS536+P553 Banner Creek, LLC DCI0609020 15FEB2021 Finalized MOI amended as of2-14-2021 Part of previous MOI documented as 

6 215G noncompl1ance.On February 15, 2021 , I, {b) ( 6) , observed multiple 

areas of ice in water troughs in Pen 7. The ice had been previously broken 

and was refreezing. Multiple pens had ice on rails and ice accumulating in the 

corners of the pens Outside temperature ih Holton this morning was -9 

degrees F and a high of-2 degrees F is anticipated. The barn is not heated 

and has had multiple water leaks and ice buildup on pen fences during the last 

week of subzero temperature. I spoke with plant management about lee in the 

barn, documented in the meeting notes ofFebruary 11th.An establishment 

operating and hot ding livestock. especially during inclement and unusually 

extreme weather, should meet regulations pertafning to housing, movement, 

water and feed. Plant management is expected to comply with all regulations 

concemin.9 livestock and make preparation for extreme heat and cold 

conditions. I spoke with (b) (6) aboutthe 

rejected pen and the conditions fn the.barn. (b) (6) responded 

managementis addressing these concerns.A copy ofthls MOI was given to 

(b) (6) and emailedto(b) (6) . Another copy is maintained 

[n PHIS.(b) (6) 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 24 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M562 JBS Green Bay, Inc. QSM1015023 

310G 

10FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 02/08/21, atapproximately 6:00am while performing antemortem inspection, 

(b) (6) observed a beef cow with its head through the railing of the fence 

in pen 34 adjacent to pen 35. The bar al the bottom of the fence had a slight 

bend justbig enough to get the head in. The cowwas lying down and did not 

seem to be in distress. The establishment barn supervisor tried to use a bottle 

jack to spread the rail apart but did not work. He then called maintenance 

personnel who brought a come-a-long. Using the come-a-long tool they were 

able to spread the rails apart enough to remove the head from the fence. When 

the cow was free from the fence., she tried to get up twice bul was unable. The 

barn superintendent immediately euthanized her when he saw she was not 

going to be able to stand. The cow then rolled over to its side and(b) (6) 

observed a fracture below the hoGk with the bone protruding through the hide 

on one of its rear legs. When the cow was lying down its legs were tucked 

under, so the fracture could not be seen in that position. The barn associate 

told (b ) (6) that the cows had not been in that pen for very long maybe a 

few hours, and he said they all looked good when he moved them into the pen. 

We discussed the incident at the weekly meeting on Wednesday February 10. 

While the cattle do get their heads "stuck" between the pipes fairly frequently, a 

fatal outcome is a fortunately rare occurrence. Changing the spacing ofthe 

pipes in al) the pens right now does seem to be unnecessary. This will be 

revisited if the situation warrants. 

M562M JBS Plainwell, Inc. CFO4613022 

818G 

18FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

f[nallzed On 2/18121 at approximately 0900, (b) (6) , wimessed three of the 

small pens 9ccupled wfth 28 large, over welgt,t beef cows. This occurred fn pen 

23. 22. and 21. Although the number did not exceed the maximum al.lowance, 

these cattle were unable to move freely around the pen and have easy access 

to water. (b) (6) was notified. He then agreed the cattle were 

overweight and had the employees move 5 cows from each pen into separate 

holding pens. After reins-pectfon, the CSI deemed the con-ection acceptable 

and passed the pens for slaughter. This may Jead to a violation of regulqUon 

3-13.2 (e). animals shall have access to water in all holding pens. 

M630 CS Beef Packers, LLC KJN0l 16021 

522G 

22FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized Al.approximately 1143, during the antemortem show. an establishment 

employee was showing the cattle in Pen 22. The cattle exited the pen without 

incident. Upon pushing the cows back into the pen. 2 cows fell in the East Alley 

after being pushed on by the other animals and were stepped on by 

multipfe times.Both cows stood up arid returned to the pen, appearing uninjured. 

The ground did not appearto be slick or otherwise difficult ro stand on. The 

<;:ows had not appeared extensively lame prior to falling. The plant employee did 

not appear to be pushing the cows excessively fast or in an unsafe manner. 

The plant employee had stopped pushinQ the cattle when he noticed one ofthe 

cows fall. I spoke with (b) (6) to make him aware of 

this incident. Because the plant employee was not acting-inappropriately. and 

there appeared to be no structural concerns, no regulatory control action was 

taken. We discussed ways to mitigate the risk of this in the future, such as 

pushing parts ofeach lot rather than the entire lot at once, ,;1nd having additional 

personnel present to assist when a cow falls. 

M6460+P646 Scanga Meat Company YLJ4811024 03FEB2021 Finalized On February 3rd. (b) (6) spoke with Ben Scanga of Sc-anga Meat

0+V6460 603G CO. Estb. M6460. It was asked ifScanga Meat CO has developed and/or 

Implemented a robust humane handltng program. The plant does not meet the 

criteria for a robust humane handling program at this time. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 25 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M717CR+l"7 

17CRSmithfield Fresh Meats Corp. RZG3407020 

325G 

25FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized Humane Handlinq DurinQ lndement Weather (HATS Category I) On 2/17/21 

and 2/18/21, I, (b) ( 6) , performed a record review of 

Smithfield Foods' humane handling records spanning from 2/15/21. to 2/16/21 . 

The record revealed that the establishment did not follow its written humane 

handling program (Section 2: Transportation and Receiving) to unload trailers In 

a timely manner with a targe[ed wait time of60 minutes. On 2/15/21 , the outside 

temperature fanged from -4 lo -25 degrees Fahrenhet\. On 2/16/21, the outside 

temperature ranged from 2 to -27 degrees Fahrenheit. On 2/15/21., the 

establishment records showed that 27 trailers arrived and were not unloaded 

until more than 60 minutes later. On 2/16/21 , the establishment records showed 

that 12 trailers arrived and were not unloaded until more than 60 minutes later. 

Due to the establishment not unloading the trailers into the heated barn, the 

animals were lefton the trailers and exposed to outside temperature that was 

below 0-degree Fahrenheit. The establishmentdid not adapt its holding 

practices to accommodate for this inclement weather. Denver District Office 

was contacted by supervisory channels. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 26 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M7722+P772 

2-I-V7722 

Jones Meat & Food Services, 

Inc. 

SAN5011015 

329G 

29JAN2021 Finalized Memorandum of Information: USDA Efforts to Schedule an Awareness Meeting 

forthe Establishment 7722 Robust Systematic Humane Handling Program On 

Wednesday, January 20, 2021 Denver District Veterinary Medical Specialist 

forwarded an assessment ofthe proposed Establishment 7722 Robust 

Systematic Humane Handling Program to (b) (6) . This assessment 

was developed by (b) (6) after her30-day review ofthe ·establishmenfs 

execution ofits Humane Handling Verification Plan on August 27, 2020. '""' 

requested lhat(b) (6) review the assessment, schedule a meeting 

with plant management and document that meeting in a MOI following c.losure of 

the recent enforcement action on January 12, 2021. (b) (6) completed his 

review of the assessment, developed discussion points to use al the meeting 

and forwarded lhemto(b) (6) . (b) (6) made multiple unsuccessful 

attempts to schedule a meeting over the past two weeks to dlscuss implementing 

and maintaining a Robust Systematic Approach to Humane Habdling with Mr. 

Jones and the establishment management At the present timeEstablishment 

7722 has not presented USDA sufficient documentation to support a rotiust 

systematic approach to humane handling, Below is a copy oft? (6j 

assessment wlth highlighted areas of com:em/emphasis.and b ( 6 evaluation points are italicized, Summary ofthe FSIS Compliance Guide fora 

Systematic Approach to the Humane Handling of Livestock to implement a 

RobustSystematic Approach Focus on the fourcomponents: 1) 1) Have 

an initial assessment performed - this is a document ofyour evaluation ofyour 

handling practices and facilities (signed, dated and available for FSIS review). 

This has been completed by the establishment. but the SPHV will need to verify 

also. The initial assessment has not been presented to (b) (6) by 

Establishment Management. 2) Qesign faoilities and implement handling 

practices to minimize distress and injury to livestock - define in the written 

program a. The written program is a description ofyour procedures and 

should consistof: i. Training program with documentation and frequency of 

retraining ii. Stunning equipment maintenance records Should include an 

inventory ·ofall stunning equipment Captive bolt #1 (Manufacturer and 

Model) (Species - intended use) Captive bolt #2 (Manufacturer and 

Model} (Species - intended use) 22Mag Rifle 

(Manufacturer and Model) Species - Intended use) 243 

Rifle (Manufacturer and Model) (Species - intended use) Each piece of 

stunning equipment must have a dedicated preventive maintenance schedule 

includin~ documentation of cleaning, lubrication and routine replacement of 

parts (rubber buffers, stunning rods, etc. in captive bolts). Cartridge storage 

should be described to avoid moisture and reduce the risk of misfires. 

Maintenance schedule should include documentation of major repairs including 

date taken out ofservice, nature of repair and date dfreturn to service. 

Documented Humane Handling Noncompliance Events: Date 

Noncompliance Document Action Taken 

Species 10/22/2020 Ineffective Stun (Rifle) NR 

NOS/Abeyance/ Sheep 

Verification Plan 7/15/2020 Ineffective Stun (Rifle) MOI 

NOS/Abeyance Cattle 

Verification Plan 5/19/2020 Ineffective Stun (CBD) NR 

RCA, District Cattle 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 27 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

Notified, Corrective 

Action 

4/10/2020 Ineffective Stun (CBD) NR RCA. District 

Notified Cattle. 

Corrective Action 12/4/2019 Water availability NR 

Local correction Cattle iii. Description of handling practices which 

address all nine Humane Activities Tracking System (HATS) Categories: 

I - measures taken to protect animals from inclement weather Document that 

ante mortem holding area is under roof and enclosed to reduce exposure to 

wind. Floors must be maintained to reduce/ eliminate slips and falls - non-skid 

surfaces and correct surface defects (holes, etc.) II - handling ofanimals 

during truck unloading Minimize height ofdrop-off when animals are exiting 

trailers. Routine use of non-skid materials when there is ice build-up Ill - water 

and feed availability Describe how water is readily available for all animals 

housed regardless of size/disability. IV - handling ofanimals during 

ante-mortem and movement to the stun box along with the facilities conditions 

Describe measures to reduce slips and falls in the chute leading to the stunning 

box. V - handling of US Suspect and disabled animals Describe measures to 

protect disabled animals from other more active/aggressive animals (partitions, 

etc.) VI - use of electric prods and alternative objects for driving of animals Be 

able to demonstrate that paddles are used for routine movement of animals 

and prod use is restricted to animals that balk aft.er paddles have 

failed. VII - measures taken to prevent slips and falls Maintenance 

of floor surfaces. Control of ice VIII - stunning procedures IX - monitoring 

animals for remaining unconscious through the shackling, hoisting and bleeding 

process. Demonstrate that all trained employees authorized to perform stunning 

are thoroughly knowledgeable of insensibility criteria (eye movement, tongue 

flaccidity and absence of righting reflex. Address bi-lingual communication 

issues. iv. Monitor records for the applicable HATS Categories (signed, dated 

and available for FSIS review): I - measures taken for inclement weather 

Document when corrective actions are taken in response to weather conditions. 

II - handling during truck unloading Document monitoring log oftruck 

unloading Ill - water and feed availability Document monitoring log of 

continuous water availability. Document provision offeed to animals 

held over 24 hours. IV - handling during ante-mortem and facilities 

conditions/repairs Document monitoring of floor conditions and anticipated 

corrections. Document monitoring for broken boards, sharp objects, etc. 

Maintain dry bedded conditions for animals held overnight. V - US Suspect or 

disabled animals Document in the program that all areas where animals are 

housed, including suspect animals, are under roof. VI - use of driving aids or 

an electric prod Document routine use of paddles - limited non-routine use of 

prods. Designated areas where prods are kept and may be obtained by 

trained individuals. Address bi-lingual clear communication issues. 

VII - observation of slips and/or falls Document monitoring on all slaughter 

days. VIII - stunning effectiveness IX - animals remaining unconscious 

Document that all trained employees understand how to evaluate insensibility 

criteria and demonstrate it when performing stunning duties. Address bi-lingual 

communication issues. 3) Periodically evaluate facilities and handling methods 

to continue to minimize distress and injury to livestock - documentation of 

routine monitoring and internal reassessments/audits (signed, dated and 

available for FSIS review) 4) Modify facilities and handling methods to continue 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 28 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

to minimize distress and injury to livestock- documentation of 

improvements/changes (signed, dated and available for FSIS review) 

Document concrete floor maintenance repair of holding pen floors, bedding and 

dry conditions maintained when animals are held. In addition: 1) Considerations 

to keep in mind but notrequired are third party audits and video camera 

surveillance/monitoring .. 

M7749+V774 

9 

Royal Gorge Packing IBK03150205 

01G 

01FEB2021 Open On January 27, 2021, I (b) (6) performed a review of 

Establrsl1ment M7749 Robust Humane Handling Program and documents. It was 

determined thatthey continue to meet the minimum requirements to maintaTn a 

robust humane handlin_g program. The program was reviewed and 

corresponding documentation was verified and up to date. 

M8131+P813 

1 +V8131 

Jensen's Blue Ribbon 

Processing 

UTF0007021 

712G 

12FEB2021 Finalized On February 9, 2021 at approximately 9:00AM. {b} (6) spoke 

with Jerry Jensen, of Jensen's BlueRibbon P.rocessing. It was asked if 

Jensen'sBlue Ribbon Processing Est 8131 has developed and/or implemented 

a robust humane. handling program. The plant does not currently have a 

program in place and is not planning on implementing one in the near future. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 29 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M818+V818 HK Cooperative, Inc, FYC2010011 

504G 

04JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On Thursday December31st. 2020 atestablishment M818, (b) (6) was observing the sticking/stunning procedure in the opening behind 

the establishment sensibility inspector around 11:30. The sensibility inspector 

was mixing the blood catch pan below the hogs and not physically inspecting 

the hog.s going by (poking with sharp instrument, flexing head and leg, etc.).A 

hog on the far side ofthe bleed chain was noticed by the establishment 

inspectorto be returning to sensibility and he was just able to reach the hog 

and administer an electric stun. Although the hog was noticed, and no other 

hogs appeared be returning to sensibility while the check was not being 

performed, this final sensibility check is essential ,md part of the establishment 

Slaughter HACCP plan. Although other tasks may need to be performed. 

ensuring that animals remain insensible during slaughter is an essential 

component of humane handling per 9CFR 313.30'(a)(4) and 313.30(b)(3) as 

Well as FSIS Directive 6900.2., Revision 3 (Humane Handling and Slaughter of 

Livestock). Jn this case immediate c-0rrective actions (re0 stunning the hog once 

noticed) did occur, but with only just enough time to physically reach the hog. A 

few minutes after this Jncident the establishment sensibility inspector noticed a 

hog had missed getting shackled andfallen in a gap between I.he end of the 

shackling table and a piece of metal framework. Stunning was immediately 

discontinued and hogs already in process for stickinq and shacklinq were 

completed to open space after the table. (b) ( 6) and (b ) (6) 

were notified and cameto the area. The hog did not appear to be 

sensible. The carcass was able to be removed successfully but was damaged in 

the process. lt is important to note though that ifa hog had returned to 

sensibility while stuck in this small space it would have been exceptionally 

difficult(ifnot impossible) to provide an additional eJectric stun and likely 

impossible to remove promptly in an appropriate manner. As stated in 9 CFR 

31330(a)(1) "animals shall be either stunned or killed before they are shackled. 

hoisted, thrown. cast, or cut". Ifthis hog had returned to sensibility while 

trapped itmay have become a non-compliance perthis regulatjon as well as an 

egregious situation (FSIS Directive 6900.2). It is also partof the establishment 

Slaughter HACCP plan that ifan animal were to faJ) from the shackte line (or 

similarly miss being shackled and fall off the bleed table) that they should be 

immediately checked for sensibility and return to the line promptly to help 

ensure proper bleed out. An unscheduled meeting was held with (b) (6) 

,(b) (6) , and (b) (6) to discuss.these issues and inform 

them that this would be documented in an MOI. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 30 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M818+v818 HK Cooperative, Inc. FYC4319014 

512G 

12JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On January 8, 2021 at establishment M818, FSIS (b) (6) was obseNing the employees driving hogs from Pen 1 1 into the stunning 

alleyway around 15:00. The pen wa5,approximateJy 25% full and the large gate 

was shut to keep hogs closer to the alleyway. As hogs continued to be driven 

into the stunning alley several hogs tried to jump up and through gaps in the 

fence. One large gap is between the gate and the barn wall where the hinges 

attach. The other gap is on the opposite side where 1he gate is cut out to 

accommodate forthe watertrough. No hogs got stuck in the gap by the hinges 

during this obseNation period. However, one hog got stuck in the gap between 

the bottom ofthe fence and the water trough. The gate was able to be opened 

without causing obvious injury to the pig and releasing it from the water trough. 

These gaps in this gate are potential issues that could be considered 

non-compliant with 9 CFR 313.1 (a) which states "Livestock pens, driveways 

and ramps shall be maintained in good repair. They shall be free from sharp or 

protruding objects which may, in the opinion of the inspector, cause injury or 

pain to the animals. Loose boards,. spLintered or broken planking, and 

1.mnecessary openings where the head, feet, orlegs ofan animal may be 

injured shall be repaired." This gate has unnecessary openings where animals 

could be injured. An employee followed the hog to the end of the pen to turn it 

around. Once they turned the hog around and got it moving in the correct 

direction the employee started to run at the hoo and chase it towards the chute. 

The employee was immediately stopped by(b) (6) , who informed him that 

hogs should not be running at all and especially should notbe chased. 

Regulation 9 CFR 313.2 clearly states that"livestock shall notbe forced to move 

faster than a normal walking speed" in addition that"driving ofHvestock ~ ..] 

shall be done with a minimum ofexcitement and discomfort to the animals". 

These actions do not meet the regulatory requirements ofhumane handlinq. An 

(Jnscheduled meelino was hetd shortly after this incident with (b) (6) , 

(b) (6) . and (b ) (6) to inform them oftheissuewiththegateandthe 

employeechasing!hehog.(b} (6) and(b) (6) werealso 

informed on Monday January 11, 2021. 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM2716013 

604G 

04JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Ffnallzed On 12/30/2020 at2318 hours. whilegivtng relief breaks at head inspection. I 

obseNed a paddle marl< on the back of i:l carcass (tattoo 0213). The mark was 

caudal to the neck and dorsal to the shoulder just offthe right of midline: see 

attachments. I placed a US retain tag on the footto divert the carcass to be 

tailed out at the disposition stand, I summoned for(b) (6) 

and (b) (6) hot side supeNisor arrived moments later. I Informed''""' 

ofmy obseNation and that this mark was consistent with an indentation 

made by a rattle paddle and that(b) (6) and (b ) (6) had similar 

obseNations documented on previous MOl's. (b) (6) correlated the finding 

With (b) (6) and a rev1ew of the video footage was i'nlUated. After all areas of 

livestock where employees use rattle paddles were reviewed. (b) (6) advised 

me that nothing out of the ordlnary was seen. This ,lnciden! was added to the 

ongoing investigation by(b) (6) . Based upon 

the lack of supportable evidence of any paddle misuse in the livestock 

department. the establishment believes the marks are being inflicted at the 

producer-confinement level possibly by members of a load[ng crew(s).MOI 

HEM47091211121 dated 12/12/2020 and MOI HEM351312511231 dated 

12/24/2020weredocumented by ~b) (6) and (b~ (6) . respectively. for 

the same obseNatlons.Respectfu ly submitted,(b) (6 

JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April S, 2021 31 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM3809010 

507G 

07JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 1/2/2021, I noticed a carcass with evidence of animal handlrng tool misuse. 

The markings resembled a rattle paddle imprint on the dorsum of U1e hogs. 

The carcass that presented with the lesion had tattoo .number 294. Several 

MOls have been issued to the establishmertt reqardinq these rnncems. 

Respectfully submitted, (b) (o) JBS Ottumwa 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM5909013 

607G 

07JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On Tuesday 1/4/2021, I noticed several· carcasses with evidence ofanimal 

handling tool misuse. The markings resembled a rattle paddle imprint on the 

dorsum of the hogs. The carcasses that presented with the lesion were from 

the following tattoos: 6257 (1); 6253 (4); 6250 (4); 6252 (1); 6247 (5); 6248 

(3). I spoke with ( b} ( 6) and he told me 

they have an open Tnvestigation into the suspect handling lesions. 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM4616014 

911G 

11JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01/09121 at1539 hours while giving relief breaks atUSDA head inspection, 

I observed a paddle mark (see attached) on the right shoulder (carcass tattoo 

6X77). I showed (b) (6) the mark and 

informed him an MOI would be issued. (b) (6) lead 

arrived and rnformed me that he would reach outto(b) {6) 

and (b) (6) regarding the finding. 

Four more carcasses wi\h paddle marks (see attached) with tattoo numbers 

0678, 067??, 6X94, and 6X96 were railed out for paddle marks via online IPP. 

(b) (6) advised me this issue was being further 

investigated by (b) (6) and(b) (6) • This 

MOI is associated with those documented by (b) (6) and (b) (6) . 

Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

-Ottumwa-Est M85O 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM1119014 

112G 

12JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalfzed On 01/11/21 at 2350 hours, I observed carcass with tattoo 0732 with two paddle 

marks (see attached). One on the right lower back and the other on the right 

middle back. The indentation marks. made by the paddles were in opposite 

directions suggesting the hog was paddled from behind and separately from 

either the side or thefront. I showed the marks to(b) (6) 

and expressed my additional concerns of hav1ng two marks on 

one animal. Nearthe end of shift, I obseNed a carcass wlth tattoo 6644 with a 

paddle mark on the lower back. (b) (6) recorded both tattoo numbers to be 

forwarded to(b) (6) to further the investigation. 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM3615010 

013G 

13JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01112/21 during 2nd shift harvest, thirteen carcasses were railed outfor 

paddle marks. The marks were located on the shoulder and upper to lower 

back. I showed each carcass to (b) (6) and 

advised him of the issuance of an MOI. (O) (6) recorded the tattoo 

numbers alonQ with photographs to be forwarded to (b) (6) 

to add to the establishments ongoing investigation. Five of the 

carcasses, from separate loads,. were associated with the same producer, and 

six other carcasses, from separate loads, were associated with another 

producer. This MO! represents a continuinq trend of lnappropriate usaqe of 

rattle paddles. Respectfully submitted, (b) ( 6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 32 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status M OI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM2208014 

713G 

13JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finallzed On Monday 1/9/2021, I noticed several carcasses with evidence of animal 

handling tool misuse. The markings resembled a rattle paddle imprint on the 

dorsum of the hogs. The carcasses that presented with the rattle paddle lesion 

were from the foltowinq tattoos: 635; 632 (2); 629; 633; 630: 631; and 6554. I 

spoke with(b) (6) regarding the lesions and 

he told me they have an open investigation into the suspect handling lesions. 

M8SO+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM4419015 

314G 

14JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01/14/21 during 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on carcasses 

with tattoo numbers 0134, 0147. and 681X. The marks were on the lower back 

andshoulder. lshowedthernarksto(b) (6) 

and informed h1m a MOlwould be issued. (b) (6) recorded 

the identification of the carcasses to be forwarded to (b) (6) 

to continue the investigation concerning the origin of the 

llnproper use ofraddle paddles. Also on 01/14/21.1 observed a donut shaped 

inark on the right ham. The mark was approxlmately 1.5 cm In diameter. This 

size and shape are consistent with a prod mark, one that is made ifthe electric 

prod is lncontact with the skin In a duration as to produce such a mark. I 

showed the mark to(b) (6) and advised him thatthe 

only employees who use electric prods that could produce a characteristic 

mark as this are on each side. of thebutfna doors adjacent to the irons. ""'~' 

radioed for (b) (6) . I advised(b ) (6) that 

since the markwas on the light ham that itcame. from the butina operator in the 

#2 location. (b) (6} advised me that hewould counsel his employees on 

proper prod usage. 

M85O+P1n 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM4219013 

514G 

14JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01 /13/21 during 2nd shift harvest, three carcasses with tattoo numbers 

6742, 086X, and 0877 were railed out for paddle marks located on themiddle 

back and light shoulder. I showed (b) {6) ,general superintendent 

the marks and informed him a MOI would be issued. (b) (6) took 

photographs and' recorded thetattoo numbers to add to the ongoing 

investigation being conducted by (b) (6) , animal welfare manager. 

Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) JBS.Ottumwa 

M85O+:P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM1416010 

816G 

16JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalfzed On 01/15/21 at 2350 hours, I observed a paddle mark on the middle lower back 

of a carcass (tattoo 0212). I showed ( b) (6} 

the mark and informed him a MOl would be issued. (b) ( 6) 

forwarded the carcass identification and mark image to (b) (6) 

to add to the ongoing invesliqation into the origins of 

Improper paddle usage. Respectfully submitted. '"'' b) ( 6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 33 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM3322015 

11 8G 

18JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01 /16/21 during 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on 17 carcasses 

having tattoo numbers 02X8, 6116, 0277, 0270. 0279, 6129. 6126. 6-, and 

0266. Some of the carcasses had 2-3 separate marks.The marks were 

located primarily on the upper and lowerback and right shoulder. I showed the 

marks to {b) (6) who forwarded the carcass 

identification to (b) (6) . The findings were 

forwarded to (b) (6) to add \o the onqoing 

investigation into the origin of improper paddle usaqe. I informed (b) ( 6) a 

MOI would be issued. Respectfully submitted. (b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 

MBSO+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM0620014 

518G 

18JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Finalized On 01118/21 during 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on carcasses 

with the following tattoo's: 0320, 6167, 033X, and 6176. The marks were 

Handling located on the right middle back, left lower back, right shoulder-upper back, and 

left Upper back. Carcass 6167 had three successive marks from the upper 

back to the right shoulder (seeattachment). I showed the marks to(b) (6) 

and infonned him a MOI would be lssued. (b) (6} forwarded .the 

carcass ldentiftcation to(b) (6) to add to the ongoing investigation 

into the origin of improper paddle usage. Respectfully submitted, ( b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April S, 2021 34 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swi~Pork Company HEM1711012 

719G 

19JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On Saturday 1/16/2021, I noticed several carcasses with evidence ofanimal 

handling tool misuse. The markings resembled a rattle paddle imprint on the 

dorsum ofthe hogs. The carcasses that presented with the rattle paddle lesion 

were from thefolloWinq tattoos: 6884 (4); 6885 (2); 6886 (2) and 24? (1). I 

spoke with ( b} (6) and he told me he would make 

lesions available to(b) (6) 

M8SO+P177 

7S+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM3010015 

019G 

19JAN2021 0.4C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

F1nalized On Monday 1/18/2021, I noticed several carcasses with evidence of animal 

handling tool misuse. The markings resembled a rattle paddle lmprint on the 

dorsum of the hogs. The carcasses that presented with the rattle paddle lesion 

were from the following tattoos: 297 (3); 294 (3): 292 (1) and 293 (1). I spoke 

wlth (b) (6) and 'he told me he would make lesions 

avaOable to (b) (6) 

M85O+P177 

75+V850 

Swift Pork Company HEM2321014 

420G 

20JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01 /19/21 during 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on 18 carcasses 

with the following tattoo numbers: 0378, 0392, 0387 x 3, no tattoo, 3928 x 9.. 

0394. 0387, and 6244. Several ofthe carcasses had multiple marks. The 

marks were observed on the back from the tail head to the neck, and 

shoulders. Via the harvest supervisory chain, (b) (6) was made aware of the marks. Carcass idenlifica6on 

was collected by(b) (6) hot side supervisor to be forwarded to-~-"' 

,(b) (6) 

and (b) (6) to add to the ongoing investigation 

of the origin of improper rattle paddle usaQe. (b) (6) was informed .a MDI 

would be issued. Respectfully (b) ( 6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM4219011 

321G 

21JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01/21/2021 durlng 2nd shift harvest at 1800 hours, I observed mulfiple 

paddle marks or\ a carcass wlth tattoo 63X6. I showed the marks to "' :~. 

. harvest supervisor andTnformed him a MDI would be 

issued. (b) (6) in tum forwarded the finding to (b) (6) . I observed 7 more carcasses with paddle 

marks during the remainder ofthe shifthaving tattoos 0499, 0X02. 

non-readable, 6367, 0497. 0X04, and 6364. The marks were primarily along the 

back from midpoint to tail base. Carcass identification and paddle pictures were 

forwarded to (b) (6) to further!he ongoing 

investiqation by the establishment. Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 

M8SO+P177 

75+V85O 

SwillPork Company HEM4019011 

121G 

21JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01 /20121 durlng 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on 10 carcasses 

with tattobs 6310, 6311, 0447, 3937 x 2, 0441 x 4, and 0440. I showed the 

marks to(b) (6) and (b) (6) 

• I informed (b) {6) a MOI would. be issued, The 

marks were observed on varying locations ofthe back and shoulders, 11 ' ' ": 

and{b) (6) forwarded carcass identification to(b} (6) .(b)(6) , and'"' ''' 

lo add to the onqoinq investigation of 

Improper paddle usage. Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April S, 2021 35 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

SwiftPork Company HEM0921012 

225G 

25JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01/22/2021 during 2nd shift harvest, at0020 hours, I observed paddle 

marks on 6 carcasses having tattoos 0X84 and 0X8X. I showed the marks to 

(b) (6) and Informed l1im a MDI would be 

issued, (b) (6) communicated the findings to (b) (6) 

to collect carcass identification and mark pictures. The 

remainderofthe shift, I observed 20 more carcasses with paddle marks having 

tattoos numbers OX84, 6428, 6427 x 5, 6434 x 10, 6433, and 6432 x 2. Many 

carcasses had multiple marks dispersed' on all areas of the back. All carcass 

Identification and pictures were forwarded to(b) (6) 

lo further the investiqation of paddl.e misuse. Respectfully submitted, 

(b) (6) JBS-Ottumwa 

M8SO+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM0816014 

326G 

26JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Finalized On 01125/21 during 2nd shift harvest, 26 carcasses were railed out for the 

presence of paddle marks. Several carcasses had multiple marks varying in 

Handling, paddle contact from slight to nearly the impression of the entire paddle. Marks 

were located throughout the back and shoulders. Tattoo numbers were as 

follows: 64$3, 6494 x 2, 6492, 6491 x 5. 0742 x 3, 0743 x 4, 0737 x 2. no 

tattoo, 6493 x 2, 0717, 6478, and 6488 x 3. I showed the marks to(b) (6) 

and (b) (6) . Carcass identification was collected by (b) (6) and other 

members ofthe harvest supervisory team and forwarded to(b) (6) 

and (b) (6) to further 

theinvestigation into the origin of paddle misuse. Respectfully submitted, 

(b) (6) JBS-Ottumwa 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM4319013 

429G 

29JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized 

Finalized 

On 01/28/21 during 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on 13 

carcasses. several of which had multiple marks. Tattoo numbers were 0896, no 

tattoo. 0111 l< 2, 6633, 0123, 0120, 0119 x 3, 0118 x 2. and 6642. I showed the 

marks to(b) (6) and informed heran MDI 

would be issued. (b) (6) collected the carcass 

identification to be forwarded to (b) (6) and 

(b) (6) ,to further the investigation into the 

oriqin of paddle misuse. Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 

On 01 /27/21 during 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on 3 

carcasses. Tattoo numbers were 6X91. 6X92, and 08X0. I showed the marks 

to (b) (6i and informed him an MDI would be 

issued. { ) (6) collected th.e carcass identification to 

beforwardedto (b) (6) and (b) (6) . to furtherthe investiqation into theoriqin of 

paddle misuse. Respectfully submltted, (b) (6) 

.JBS-Ottumwa 

~ 

M85O+P177 

75-tV8.5O 

Swift Pork Company HEM4119013 

029G 

29JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

M8SO+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift PorkCompany HEM3819013 

529G 

29JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01/27/21 at 0145 hours (01/26 harvest). I observed paddle marks on lhe 

back of a carcass with tattoo number 0794. I showed the ma(ks to'"',., 

and Informed him an MDI would be 

issued. (b) (6) collected the carcass identification to be forwarded to 

(b) (6) and(b) {6) 

via (b) (6) , to 

further the investiqation into the oriqin of pad'dle misuse. Respectfully submitted, 

(b) (6) JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 36 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

SwiftPork Company HEM3876013 

230G 

30JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01 /3012021 (01/29 harvesl) during 2nd shift harvest. I observed multiple 

paddle marks on 12 carcasses with the following tattoos: 6686, 0176, 6691, 

6692 x 2, 01 X9 x 2, 01 X8, 6693, 6694, and 669X x 2. Location ofmarks ranged 

from the tail base to the dorsal neck. I showed the marks to (b} (6) 

and informed him a MOI would be issued. ,_, '" 

and the harvest supervisory team coltected carcass identification to 

beforwarded to (b) (6) and (b) (6) 

to further the onqoinq invesliqation of paddle 

misuse. Respectfully submitted, {b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 

M8SO+P177 

7S+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEMQ302011 

931G 

.31JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On 01/30121 on 2nd shift harvest, I observed paddle marks on 2 carcasses, one 

With 1 tattoo number 0214 and the other one did not have a tattoo. I informed "

11• 

of the findings and that a MDI would be 

issued. {b) .(6) recorded the carcass identification to be forwarded to "' '"

1 

and(b) (6) 

to add to the ongoing investiqation into the origins ofimproper 

paddleusage. Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 

M85O+P177 

75+V850 

Swift Pork Company HEM4402024 

214G 

l4FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized During 2nd shift harvestfor the week of 02108/21, IPP railed out 48 carcasses 

for the presence ofpaddle marks. Many of the carcasses had multiple marks 

and locations ranged from the hams. tail base, neck and along both sides of the 

back. I showed the-carcasses to a member of the supervisory harvest team on 

each occasion and they in turn forwarded carcass identification and pictures to 

(b) (6) and(b) (6) , per the SOP for investigating paddle marks, dated 

1/14/21. Dates and tattoo numbers are as follows: 02/08121 - 6306, 0X45, 

0X46, 0X29, 6319, and 6317; 02109 - 0X82, 0X94, 0X96 and 6374; 

02110 - 0643, non-readable, 6434, and 6434; 02111 - 6X0X x 2. 6496, 0730. 

649Xx 3. and 0719; 02112 - 0766 x 3, 6XX1 x 2, 0770, 6XX4 x 5, 6XXX, 6X70, 

0778, and 0773; 02/13 - 082X, 0828, 0833, and 0829 x 8. I informed (b) (6) 

that a MDI would be issued, Respectfully 

submitted, (b) (6) JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 37 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

SwiflPork Company HEM0916022 

119G 

19FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized During 2nd shift harvest for the week of 02/15/21, IPP railed out 1 S carcasses 

for the presence ofpaddle mar1<s. Many ofthe carcasses had multiple marks 

and locations ranged from dorsal neckand along both sides ofthe back. I 

showed the carcasses to a member ofthe supervisory harvest team on each 

occasion and they in turn forwarded carcass identification and pictures to'";,, 

and (b) (6) 

, per the SOP for investigating paddle marks, dated 

1/14/21. Dates and tattoo numbers are as follows: 02/16/21 -6713 (prod 

mark), non-readable (multiple elongated concave marks with subcutaneous 

bruising), 0130 x 3, and 6740; 02/17 - 6772, 3960 x 2, and 3961 (prod mark); 

02/18-0220, 68X7 x 2. and 0221; 02/19- 0281 . I tnformed (b) (6) 

that a MO! would be issued. HAT 

task - Category II - Truck unloading has been increased and no paddle misuse 

has been observed. During OHi (odd hour inspection) on 02/11/21, no paddl'e 

misuse was observedi also, no paddJe misuse has been observed In-plant. 

Concerning the prod mark on 02/16/21 , tattoo 6713, the establishment 

conducted a thorough investigation and discovered the root cause and from this 

produced written corrective actions and preventative measures; these 

documents are attached lo the MDI in PHIS. Compared with last weeks 

findings, this week has shown a dramatic decrease from 46 to 15 carcasses. 

Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM5915024 

226G 

26FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized On Wednesday 2/24/2021 , I noticed several carcasses with evidence ofanimal 

handling tool misuse. The markings resembled a round electric prod mark 

imprint on the ham ofthe hogs. The carcasses that presented with the 

concentric circle lesion were from the followlnq tattoos:435 and 430. t spoke 

with (b) (6) who infomied mehe would be 

going to the. harvest floor to examine the·lesions" 

M850+P177 Swift Pork Company HEM5307023 26FEB2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized On Thursday 2/25/2021 , I noticed several carcasses with evidence of animal 

75+V850 726G Humane handling tool misuse. The markings resembled a rattle paddle imprint on the 

Handling dorsum of the hogs. The carcasses thatpresented with the·rattle paddle lesion 

were from the following tattoos: 6299 and 494. I showed the lesions to (b ) (6) 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 38 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M85O+P177 

75+V85O 

SwiflPork Company HEM3218022 

427G 

27FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized During 2nd shift harvest for the week of 02/22/21, IPP railed out 92 carcasses 

for the presence ofpaddle marks. Many ofthe carcasses had multiple marks 

and locations ranged from the tail base to the dorsal region of the neck and 

along both sides ofthe back. I showed the carcasses to a memberof the 

supervisory harvest team on each occasion and they in turn forwarded carcass 

identification and pictures to (b) ( 6) and'"''•1 

• per the SOP for investigating 

paddle marks, dated 1/14/21. Dates andtattoo numbers are asfollows: 

02/22- 03X1 x 2, 03X2, 0343 x 3, 0340, 034X, 6136 x 3, 0360, 036X, 0366 x 

2,. 0362 x 4, 6147, 0346 x 6, and 613X x, 3; 02/23 - 6191, 6186, 0421 , 6189, 

6188, 6203, and 6199: 02/24-62X3, 62XX, 0472, 0471, 0473, 6273 x 8, 6274 

x 10, 6269, 62X9, and non-readable: 02/25 - 0X10 x 2, 6316, 0X02, OX06, 

6313 x 2, DX12, 6302 x 5. 6301 .x 2, 6317 x 2, 6321 x 3, DX23 x 2, 3999, and 

6328: 02/26-OXX6 x 2, 0X64. and 0X72; 02/27 - 6441 and 642X. I informed 

(b} (6) that a MO) would be'issued. 

No implement misuse has been observed during HATta.sks - Category 

II. - Truck unloading and Category VI - Bectric Prod/Allernative Object Use. 

Representative pictures of paddle mark bruises are attached to this MDI in 

PHIS. Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

JBS- Ottumwa 

M8SO+P177 Swift Pork Company HEM3521033 04MAR2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized Atapproximately 1912 hours, I was walking tram thehog holding pens along the

7S+V85O 804G Humane 

Handling 

alley leadif'\g the stunning area. Plant personnel were moving hogs thru the afley 

to the halfcircle pens driving the hogs ln irons leading to the stunners. The 

employee in the dark purple hatwas mov1ng hogs thru the half circle pen on the 

SoUth side. His back was towards me and I ebseNed as he was moving the 

hogs he was raTsing his right hand with a plastic back above his head and 

swinging the bat with force onto the hogs fn the halfcircle pen. He was doing 

this repeatedly as he was trying to move the hogs. The employee with a white 

moving the hogs thru the guillotine gate Into the half circle penrepeatedly try to 

stop the employee from forcibly hitting thehogs. After three attempt ofverbal 

communication he reached out and stopped him from swinging the bat After he 

turned and saw me , he stopped using the bat above his shoulder. I went and 

found (b) (6 J and informed hfm of what I saw. He 

stated he would address the situatlon, I inforrned (b) (6) about the 

episode heinstructed me to write the MDI. 

M85O+P177 

7S+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM0321031 

805G 

0SMAR2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized During 2nd shift harvest for the week of03I01/21, IPP railed out 33 carcasses 

for the presence of paddle marks. Many of the carcasses had multiple marks 

and locations ranged from the tail base to the dorsal region ofthe neck and 

along both sides ofthe back. I showed the carcasses to a memberof the 

supervisory harvest team on each occasion and they in turn forwarded carcass andi111,ii\ identific:ation and pictures to (b) (6) 

, per the SOP for investigating 

paddle marks, dated 1 /14/21 , Dates and tattoo numbers are as follows: 

03/04 - 08XX, 0860, 08X3 x 9, 08X2 x 7, 08X1 , artd 6660; 03/05-089X x 7, 

0104. 0106 x 2. 0107 x 2, and 6701. One ofthe carcasses tattooed 0107 

had > 1:1 marks on the back: the producer was RC Family Farms. I infonned 

(b) (6) that a MDI would be 

Issued. Representative pictures of paddle mark bruises are attached to this 

MOiin PHiS. RespectfVlly submltted.(b) (6) 

JBS-Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 39 

EstNbr Est Name MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status M OI Agenda 

M85O+P177 SwiflPork Company HEM4016032 16MAR2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized During 2nd shift harvest for the week of 03/08/21 , IPP railed out 14 carcasses 

75+V85O 616G Humane 

Handling 

for the presence ofpaddle marks. Some ofthe carcasses had multiple marks 

and locations ranged from along both sides of the back to the dorsal neck. I 

showed the carcasses to a member ofthe supervisory harvest team on each 

occasion and they in turn forwarded carcass identification and pictures to Wi"' 

and (b) (6) , per the SOP for investigating paddle marks, dated 

1 /14/21 . Dates and tattoo numbers are as follows: 03/08 -0178, 6770, and 

6772; 03/09 - 0220 x 2. 6838 x 2, 6841 x 3, 6840 x 2. and 6842 x 2. I 

Informed (b) (6) that a MDI would 

be issued. Representative pictures of paddle mark bruises are attached to this 

MOiin PHiS. Respectfully submitted, (b) (6) 

JBS- Ottumwa 

M8SO+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM2919030 

019G 

19MAR2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized During 2nd shift harvest for the week of 03115121. IPP railed out 15 carcasses 

for the presence ofpaddle and prod marks. Some of the carcasses had 

multiple marks and locations rarwed from along. both sides ofthe back to the 

dorsal neck and chest. I showed the marks to a member ofthesupervisory 

harvest team on each occaslon and they in turn forwarded carcass and1111,,.,, Identification and pictures to{b) (6) 

, per the SOP forinveS'ligating 

paddlemarks, dated 1/14/21. Dates and tattoo numbers are as follows: 

03/15-6676: 03/17 -0X63, 0X63 (10 cm O.D. x 5 cm I.D. donut shaped 

mark - dorsal mid neck), 6382, and 0X77 x 3 (prod marks); 03/18 - 6433 

(numerous - 35 - 12mm circular prod marks), 0634 x 2, and 0636; 

03/19 - 0704 x 2, 0701. arid 6X18. I informed (b) (6) 

that a MDI would be issued. Representative pictures ofdonut. paddle 

i;lnd prod marl<s are attached to this MDI ln PHIS. Corrective actions for the 

prod marks associated with tattoo OX77 are also attached to thts MOI fn PHIS. 

The origin ofthe donut mark is unknown at t~is time .. Respectfully submitted, 

(b} (6) JBS- Ottumwa 

M8SO+P177 

75+V85O 

Swift Pork Company HEM1221034 

229G 

29MAR2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized During 2nd shift harvest for the week of 03122/21, IPP railed oul 5 carcasses 

for the presence ofpaddle marks; all the carcasses were railed' out on 

03/26/21. Some ofthe carcasses had multiple marks and were located along 

both sides of the back. I showed the carcasses to a memberofthe supervisory 

harvestteam on each occasion and they in tum forwarded c-arcass 

•

1

• 

1 Identification and pictures to (b ) (6) and 111 

, per the SOP for investigating 

paddle marks, dated 1/14/21. Tattoo numbers are as follows: 03/26 - 0168, 

6790, and 0180 x 3. 1 informed (b) (6) that a 

MDI would be issued: Representative pictures of paddle mark bruises are 

attached to this MDI in PHIS. Respectfully submitted.(b) (6) 

JBS - Ottumwa 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 40 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M8971+P897 

1+V8971 

R FourMeats DBJ1212023 

602G 

02FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Open On 2/1/21, while I was observing HATS Category VIII-Stunning Effectiveness, 

while the establishment was attempting to stun the firstbovine offive presented 

for antemortem inspection, I observed the following: The restraineris 

constructed of spaced round metal tubing between comer posts; there are 5 

metal tubes that run parallel with the ground spaced vaiyingly from 

approximately 8 inches to 14inches apart. Ther.e is a·guillotine type gate that 

closes behind the animal after entering that is constructed from the same metal 

tubing, with similar spacing between bars. There is approximately 3 inches to 4 

Inches of space between the restrainer and wall along one ofthe long sides of 

the restrainer. There is not a head catch, allowing the beeffreedom to move 

around in the restrainer. The firstbeef animal attempted to jump out of the top 

of the restrainer, causing the left front l'eg to become stuck between the metal 

tubes of the restrainer at approximately the beefs shoulder height; the beefs leg 

was stuck above the 4th metal tube from the floor. I also noted that the rear 

right hoofhad become pinched between the restrainer and wall above the first 

tube from thefloor of the restrainer. The animal remained stuckthis way for 

approximately 2 to 3 minutes until (b} (6) 

successfully stunned the animal in the position described with the first shot from 

the hand-held captive boltgun. WhiJe the animal was stuck ittried to jump out 

of the restrainer at least one more time. however I did notobserve the anfmal to 

vocalize or exhibit excessive excitement while it was stuck. During posl mortem 

inspection I did not observe any bruising or injuries to the at1imals legs. The 

2nd animal on the same day entered the slaughter floor in a very excited state, 

vocalizing repeatedly. It took 5 or 6 attempts for the slaughter floor managerto 

drive the animal from the holding pen, into the restrainer and succ:essfully close 

the guillotine gate. The ahimal appeared to be in an exdted state before any 

attempts to·driw:? the animal were made. 

M9041+P904 

1+V9041 

Sturgis Meats LLC PTE.4412010 

606G 

06JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling, 

Finalized While performing a review ofthe establlshments humanehandlingprogram I 

observed two areas where the establishment is failing to follow fts written 

program. - The program states that management will review thestunnlng device 

maintenance log monthly and no review was performed in December. - The 

program also states that the humane handling log will have a DO and RR 

completed monthly arid no review was performed in December. 

M9041+P904 

1+V9041 

Sturgis Meats LLC PTE17150.24 

408G 

08FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

)-lumane 

Handling 

Finalized While performing a review of\he establishments humane handling program, I 

observed two areas where the establishment has failed to follow its written 

program for the la sttwo months: ->The humane handling program states that 

management will review the stunning device maintenance log once monthly and 

no review was performed in December or Januaiy. ->The humane handLing 

program also states that records review ofthe humane handling log will be done 

once monthly and no review was performed in December 0r Januaiy. This is 

the sec:ond notification to the establishment that the establishment has failed to 

~erform their appropriate record reviews as stated intheir program. At this time 

e humane handling program cannot be considered robust as the 

establishment has failed overthe pasttwo mon\hs to implement and maintain 

their humane handling program as written. By the end ofthe week the 

establishment believes they will be implementing and maintaining their humane 

handling program as written again. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07:28 Monday, April 5, 2021 41 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M9041+P904 Sturgis Meats LLC PTE5909022 23FE82021 04C02 Livestock Finalized After reviewing the establishments humane handling program again, the 

1+V9041 823G Humane establishment has shown to be implementing and maintaining their humane 

Handling handling program as written. As of2/22/2021 , the humane handling program 

can be considered robust 

M9065+P906 

5+V9065 

Wamplers Fann Sausage GHB0106024 

703G 

03FE82021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized Wampler's Fann Sausage updated the Firearm Discharge Warning System 

(FSIS 4791-36) and FSIS was given a copy on February 2, 2021. It states 

''The manager or lead will notify any FSIS personnel present in barn of the 

need for firearm discharge and will allow time for the personnel to go to a safe 

area before discharge. The safe area for firearm discharge in barn will be the 

USDA office or interior ofharvest floor." Wampler's had a prolonged failure of 

their electrical stun system this afternoon (February 2, 2021 ). There was an 

electrical wand failure on January 11, 2021 where the plant had to switch to 

mechanical stunning because the backup wand was reportedly also broke and 

being repaired at the maintenance shop. There was a failure of the electrical 

stunning system on January 15, 2021 where the plant had to switch to 

mechanical stunning because it reported moisture had gotten in the control box 

and caused it not to operate. Wampler's is currently using a captive bolt as 

their primary means of stunning and reloading for a secondary stun or using a 

41 Oshotgun. The firearm was used several times without any warning to IPP. 

After I discussed the plant's Firearm Discharge Warning System with the Kill 

Floor Supervisor and the lead employee performing the stunning, firing the gun 

without notification to IPP continued. I was told by Ted Wampler Jr. that I have 

been notified they will be firing a gun in the stunning area so I should not be 

there for my safety. I told him they are to notify FSIS each and every time a 

firearm is to be discharged as IPP must be able to verify stunning effectiveness 

and monitor for regain of consciousness. Also, I told him that animals cannot be 

stacked in knock box in a way that precludes IPP from perfonning verification 

procedures as they had hogs lined up and were stunning one after another and 

sometimes using thefirearm and I could not verify what was happening. I 

added, if a mechanically stunned animal kicks another conscious animal, that is 

non-compliance. Mr. Wampler stated that the hogs run up together and they 

cannot keep them separated. I stated that maybe that is something they can 

evaluate. Additionally, Wampler's is not following procedures as outlined in 

their humane handling plan, as exampled by untrained employees coming out to 

"help" in the stunning area and using an electric prod to move animals. 

Wampler's plan states "Employees are given the training of Humane handling 

prior to starting an animal position." There is a training log and the employee 

observed using the electric prod to move animals was not on ii as ofFebruary 

2, 2021. I have provided a copy ofFSIS Directive 6090.1: FIREARMS SAFETY 

IN OFFICIAL LIVESTOCK ESTABLISHMENTS. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 42 

EstNbr EstName M OINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Stat us M OI Agenda 

M9228+P922 

B+V9228 

Carlton Packing Company YQB5612035 

00BG 

0BMAR2021 Finalized Due to the March 2, 2021 enforcementaction, M9228 Carlton Packing is no 

longerconsidered by FSIS to have a robust systematic approach to humane 

handling. FSIS Directive 6900.2 Revision 3 "NOTE: If an establishment is 

suspended (Notice of Suspension (NOS)) or receives a Notice of lntentled 

Enforcement Action (NOIE) due to an egregrous 'inhumane handling anc;J 

slaughter event. they will no longer be considered by FSIS to have a robust 

systematic approach. The establishment will need to proffer corrective actions 

and preventive measures to the DO in order to develop a verification plan (Refer 

to: FSIS Directive 5100.3 "Administrative Enforcement Action Decision-Making 

and Methodology"). The establishment may request a review of their system 

after the suspension has been lifted to determine if their system 1s again 

robust" 

M934 Charlie DiMaria & Sons VMH5617022 

~02G 

02FEB2021 Rnalized (b) (6~ needs to confirm some missing fnformatlon with (b) (6) prior 

to finis ing hertruck audit on one totfor date 01/26/2021. Plant Response: 

Spoketo (b) (6) she said(b} (6)will speak to (b) (6) in regards tothe 

missing information today or tomorrow morning. 

M934 Charlie DiMaria & Sons VMH5309025 

305G 

05FEB2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized At7:15am, 1,(b) (6) , observed thatthe steps in the 

serpentine as described in NR VMH4209011 3430N have not been repaired and 

now are in worst condition. A cement step is no longer encased around the 

rods, in result, exposing 2 projecting metal rods. IPP ask for a possible 

temporary fix. Livestock pens, driveways, and rams shall be maintained in 

good repair. They shall be free from sharp or protruding objects which may 

cause injury or pain to the animals. Another copy of NR VMH42090113430N is 

provided and is to remain open. Plant Response: Plans to have it fix,ed this 

weekend, in the meantime, will cut the metal rods down to ground level. 

Approximately 0540 hours. I. (b) (6) . observed a 

pooling of a Hoating brown slurry (fecal matter/ingesta/water) In Pen 5 and 6 

including the associated alleyway. About 60-70% ofthe slurry was floating 

above the cement grates, other areas ofthe alley ways and pens were dry. 

Antemortem was performed on Pen 2 (Pen 2 did notrequire going through the 

slurry). When asked,(b) (6) , informed me that the 

trouqh was broken. I asked (b) (6) to call (b) ( 6) 

, or any members upper manaqementavailable but was unable to. 

(b ) (6) wasabletocontact(b) (6) .to let him 

know about the conditions of the pens and the potential for slips and falls. I also 

wasabletospeakto (b ) (6) later. (b) (6) ,electedtodelay 

antemortem inspection to attempt to improve the conditions ofthe pens. 

M934 Charlie DiMar1a & Sons VMH0809030 

426G 

26MAR2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handllng 

Finaliz.ed 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday, April 5, 2021 43 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status M OI Agenda 

M96 Florida Beef, lhc. HM0812032 

918G 

18MAR2021 Finalized On 3/28/21 at approximately 0945 hrs. while performing a Livestock Humane 

Handling procedure, !PP observed the following deviation. While observing 

livestock stunning procedures, IPP observed a plant management position a 

cow into the knock box and secure its head inside the head restrain. A plant 

employee then -proceeded to stun the animal with a captive bolt stunner instead 

of the pneumatic penetrating stunner. After reviewing the establishment's 

Humane Handling and Stunning record's, it was discovered that the employee 

had notreceived Humane Handlinq traininq as required by the establishment. 

IPP notified(b) (6) of the deviation. By allowing .this 

deviation to exist. the establishmentfailed lo comply with the procedures set 

forth in their Livestock Humane Handling Plan. This MOI serves as written 

notification that failure to meet requirements documented in the plan could 

result in a regulatory noncompliance. 

M960 Greater Omaha Packi119 Co., 

Inc. 

PEE3312013 

125G 

25JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized Atapproximately 07:S0am on Monday January 25, 2021 while I, (b) (6) was performing a routine humane handling task. the following issuewas 

observed. A pen of nvestock were released from a pen tnto the central ally to 

go to the ca1Tousel. They Were naturally-running initially, but the handler trailing 

them was. while running to catch up, wavi'ng his wand with a plastic flag and 

shouting, causing the cattle to continue to run. The(b ) (6) was 

notified. who immediately talked with the handler personally, and shortly after 

(b) (6) was notified who immediately with aid of an official 

translator, had a meeting with all cattle handling personnel. This action was not 

In compliance with regulation 313.2(a) where when driving livestock from the 

holding pens to the stunning area, livestock shall be handled with a minimum of 

excitement and shall not be forced to move faster than a normal walking speed. 
Table: MOls in Response to FOIA2021-263 07'.28 Monday. April 5, 2021 44 

EstNbr EstName MOINbr Date 

Task 

Code TaskName Status MOI Agenda 

M966+P1904 Univ of Arizona Food CTN3810034 1SMAR2021 04C02 Livestock Finalized On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 1:46pm, l (b) (6) . observed 

9+V966 Products & Safety Lab 315G Humane 

Handling 

cattle coming off of a truckwhen I walked outof the plant building to take a 

phone call. When my phone call was finished at 1:51pm, I walked over to the 

cattle unloading area to observe humane handling. The plant employee handling 

lhe anfmals notified me that 4 ofthe cattle appeared to have broken limbs. 

rhese 4 cows were separated from U1e rest of the lot When I inquired about 

where these animals came from, I was told (b) (4) I was also told by a plant 

employee that the person who dropped off the cattle handled Uiem "too roughly" 

and appeared' to make a fist at a cow that was not moving and "hit itin the ribs." 

I did not physically see this occur. I told Dr. Sam Garcia, plant manager, that 

producer(b) (4) had dropped off4 cattle with apparent broken limbs. He 

acknowled.ged this and stated that that is why they are being sentto slaughter, 

ilnd itis normal for a producer with 4000 head of cattle to have to have some 

cattle with broken limbs especially bulls since they are more active. I told Dr. 

Garcia that regardless df what is normal in the industry that I was concerned 

since 4 of the 9 animals were in this condition, and that he was aware of 

subsequent ante mortem actions if the animal does not ambulate to the knock 

box. Dr. Garcia stated that he was aware thatthe animals would be condemn ,if 

they did nolambulate to the knock box. Further conversation on this topic is to 

be discussed atthe establishmentweekly meeting. 

M969G SwiftBeef Company NDH0115015 

122G 

22'JAN2021 04C02 Livestock 

Humane 

Handling 

Finalized HATS Category IV-Ante-mortem Inspection At approximately 2100 hours on 

1/21/2021, I', (b) (6) .was conducting the second antemortem 

inspection for B-shift when I observed beetcattle becoming overly excited when 

driven. I was standing above the cattle on the catwalk while(b) (6) 

wasopenitig/closjng pensand {b) (6) 

was standing on the bottom rung of the pen gate at the opposite end of the 

holding pens from {b) (6) , continuously yelling at thecattleto move as 

they ran tothe opposite end ofthe pen. This resulted in cattle crowding the 

gates pefore they were opened and then running through the gate once it was 

opened. This occurred during antemortem inspection of multiple pens. where I 

saw at least one animal slip. I noticed that(b) (6) was havinq to open the 1 1 pen gate and then close it before he could open the next pen, while • /i, 

would move onto thenext pen and start yelling althe cattle again from 

the back ofthe pen, resulting in the cattle running Lip and crowding the gate that 

had yetto be opened. When (b) (6) wentto open the gare, the overly 

excited cattle all started turning and .trying to run in the opposite direction 

towards {b) (6) who Was still yelling at them to move. This resultedln at 

least one animal Jumping Into the water trough and the group ofcattle visibly 

distressed, turning frantically in both directions and trying to move over each 

other. I immediately notified (b) (6) thatthe constant yelling was causing 

the cattle to run and become overly .excited during anternortem inspection and 

not move at.their normal pace. (b) (6} then infom~ed (b) (6) to 

calm down on theyelling, and the rest of ai1ternortem was conducted with 

minimal excitement. I notified (b) (6) about the s1tuation 

and he informed methat (b) (6) is humane handling trained but hels 

supposed to be cleaning pens and itls not his job to help move cattle."' " ' 

informed methat he would talk to(b) (6) aboutthe issue. I 

remind you of9 CFR 313.2(a) that states "Driving of livestock from the 

unloadfng ramps to the holding pens and from the holding pens to the stunning 

11rea shall be done with a minimum ofexcitement and discomfort to the animals. 

Livestock shall not be forced to move faster than a nonnal walking speed."