alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.21


                           J&L SPECIALTY STEEL, INC.

                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                        SENIOR MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

                          DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 1997


        The J&L Specialty Steel, Inc. Senior Management Incentive Plan as 
amended and restated on January 1, 1992 and as further amended as of January 1, 
1993 and January 1, 1996, is hereby amended by this Third Amendment effective 
January 1, 1997 in the following respects, pursuant to the power to amend such 
plan contained in Article 5.5 thereof:

        1. Section 2.1(f) of the Plan, defining Net Operating Assets, will be 
amended to add the following paragraph to the end thereof:

           For calendar year 1997, all capital costs associated with the direct
           roll anneal and pickle line project at the Corporation's Midland
           Plant (the "DRAP Line") will not be included in the definition of
           assets.

        2. Section 2.1(g) of the Plan, defining Operating Income, will be 
amended to add the following new paragraph to the end thereof:

           For calendar year 1997, the following amounts will be added (i) the
           amount of depreciation related to the DRAP Line, and (ii) Twelve
           Million Dollars ($12,000,000).

        3. Except as expressly provided in this Third Amendment, and as 
previously amended, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan remain in full 
force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Third Amendment to 
be executed by its duly authorized officers this 22nd day of January, 1997,
effective as of January 1, 1997.


ATTEST:                                 J&L SPECIALTY STEEL, INC.


/s/ KIRK F. VINCENT                     /s/ PHILIPPE CHOPPIN DE JANVRY
----------------------------            ---------------------------------
    Kirk F. Vincent                         Philippe Choppin de Janvry
    Secretary                               Chairman
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2649

To authorize States and political subdivisions of States to control the

movement of municipal solid waste generated within their jurisdictions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15, 1993

Mr. MINGE (for himself, Mr. PENNY, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr.

VENTO, and Mr. OBERSTAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To authorize States and political subdivisions of States to

control the movement of municipal solid waste generated

within their jurisdictions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AFFIRM AND AUTHORIZE THE RIGHT OF

4 STATES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF

5 STATES TO CONTROL MOVEMENT OF MUNICI6 PAL SOLID WASTE.

7 (a) AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (b), a State

8 or a political subdivision of a State may require, by law,

9 ordinance, or regulation, that all or any portion of the mu-
2

•HR 2649 IH

1 nicipal solid waste generated within its jurisdiction be

2 processed, composted, disposed of, or otherwise managed

3 at a facility designated by the State or political subdivision

4 for that purpose.

5 (b) LIMITATION.—The authority provided by sub6 section (a) may be exercised only if the designated waste

7 management facility is in compliance with all applicable

8 Federal and State environmental laws and regulations.

9 (c) MATERIALS SEPARATED FOR RECYCLING NOT

10 COVERED.—Nothing in this section shall be interpreted,

11 construed, or applied to authorize a State or political sub12 division of a State to require materials that have been sep13 arated or diverted from municipal solid waste, for the pur14 pose of recycling or composting, to be processed,

15 composted, disposed of, or otherwise managed at a facility

16 designated by the State of political subdivision of the

17 State.

18 (d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of the Act, the term

19 ‘‘municipal solid waste’’ (MSW) means garbage and refuse

20 that is discarded as solid wastes from residential, commer21 cial, institutional and industrial sources and community

22 activities, including residue remaining after recyclable ma23 terials have been separated. The term does not include—

24 (1) any waste identified or listed as hazardous

25 waste under section 3001 of the Solid Waste Dis-
3

•HR 2649 IH

1 posal Act (42 U.S.C. 6921) other than any such

2 hazardous waste that is contained in household

3 waste from single and multiple dwellings, and other

4 residential sources; and

5 (2) materials and products returned from a dis6 penser or distributor to the manufacturer for credit,

7 evaluation, and possible reuse.

Æ
Export Labeling Approval Chart 

The chart below provides additional guidance on whether a label for export only with deviations from domestic 

requirements (9 CFR 317.7 and 9 CFR 381.128) should be submitted for sketch approval. For more 

information about generic approval and label submission, please refer to the FSIS Compliance Guidance for 

Label Approval 

Three ways an export label is approved: 

1) The export label complies with domestic requirements and does not fall into one of the four categories 

in 9 CFR 412.1. Generically approved; see 9 CFR 412.2 

2) The export label falls into one of the four categories in 9 CFR 412.1 or has labeling deviations. The 

label requires submission to LPDS. 

3) The final export label has been prior approved, and the company is making a change. 

a) If the change does not affect prior approved claims, create a new labeling deviation, or add new 

claims or special statements, the change is generically approved under 9 CFR 412.2 and does not 

require submission to LPDS. 

b) If the change does affect prior approved claims, create a new labeling deviation, or add new claims 

or special statements, the change requires submission to LPDS for approval under 9 CFR 412.1. See 

the FSIS Compliance Guidance for Label Approval 

LABEL ATTRIBUTES ACTION REGULATORY 

AUTHORITY 

A Meets FSIS domestic requirements. Generic approval permitted if allowed 

domestically. 

9 CFR 412.2 

B Deviates from FSIS domestic 

requirements (with exception of labels 

printed in foreign language or labels 

with net weight expressed in metric 

units). 

Sketch approval required. Label 

submission should include supporting 

documentation verifying foreign 

government acceptance of the labeling 

deviation. 

9 CFR 412.1 

C1 

Previously sketch approved with 

changes that do not affect any claims 

or create new labeling deviations. 

Generic approval is allowed. 9 CFR 412.2 

C2 

Previously sketch approved with 

changes that do affect claims, create 

new labeling deviations, or adds new 

claims. 

Sketch approval required. 9 CFR 412.1 

D1 

The addition of a foreign language 

sticker with additional labeling 

information required by the importing 

country. The sticker does not add a 

claim or new labeling deviation. 

Generic approval is allowed. 9 CFR 412.2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

D2 

The addition of a foreign language 

sticker with additional labeling 

information required by the importing 

country. The sticker adds a claim or 

new labeling deviation. 

Sketch approval required. 9 CFR 412.1 

E Foreign language only, the addition of 

direct translation of foreign language 

on English labels, and/or net weight 

expressed in metric. 

Generic approval is allowed if these are 

the only labeling deviations. English 

translation must be part of labeling 

record and must have Est. number and 

inspection legend in English. 

(9 CFR 317.7; 381.128) 

9 CFR 412.2 

For additional information on labeling, please refer to: Labeling/Label Approval
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                  FROM  THE   CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE  SHEETS  AND   CONSOLIDATED
                  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  FOUND  ON  PAGES 1, 2 AND 3 OF THE
                  COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN
                  ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-30-1998
<CASH>                                                         (75,569)
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                2,060,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  (134,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                  3,286,367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             5,411,496
<PP&E>                                                       4,652,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (2,522,671)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               7,709,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        4,757,551
<BONDS>                                                        497,938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                        55,406
<OTHER-SE>                                                   2,398,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 7,709,536
<SALES>                                                     11,237,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            11,237,554
<CGS>                                                        9,168,487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                9,168,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             1,887,383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            (256,946)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  1,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              1,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    50,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
2009-1157.

#### Cleveland v. Alex Solomon Family Ltd. Partnership.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90488, 2009-Ohio-2025.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)

OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of West Marine, Inc. (the
Company) for the year ended January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, Geoffrey A. Eisenberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Thomas R.
Moran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    GEOFFREY A.
EISENBERGName:

Geoffrey A. EisenbergTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 17, 2010/s/    THOMAS R.
MORANName:

Thomas R. MoranTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 17, 2010


A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b), or other documentation authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Rule 13a-14(b), has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2691

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that future increases

in the monthly amount paid by the State of New York to blind disabled

veterans shall be excluded from the determination of annual income

for purposes of the payment of pension by the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1993

Mr. PAXON (for himself, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. MCNULTY, Mrs. MALONEY, and

Ms. MOLINARI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that

future increases in the monthly amount paid by the

State of New York to blind disabled veterans shall be

excluded from the determination of annual income for

purposes of the payment of pension by the Secretary

of Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2691 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS FROM IN2 COME DETERMINATION FOR PENSION PUR3 POSES.

4 Section 1503 of title 38, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of para7 graph (9);

8 (2) by striking out the period at the end of

9 paragraph (10) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

10 and

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new

12 paragraph:

13 ‘‘(11) amounts equal to amounts paid to a vet14 eran by the State of New York under a program of

15 that State to make monthly payments to qualifying

16 veterans who are blind and totally disabled, but only

17 to the extent that such amounts are attributable to

18 any increase in the monthly amount of such pay19 ments that is provided after the date of the enact20 ment of this paragraph.’’.

Æ
[No. 25437-2-III.

Division Three.

August 9, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jonathan Shannon Lagoy, *Appellant.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for Stevens County, No. 06-1-00007-7, Allen Nielson, J., entered June 14 and August 2, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C. J., and Stephens, J.
[Cite as State v. White, 2016-Ohio-2941.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 103351 

STATE OF OHIO

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT 

vs. 

STEVE WHITE

DEFENDANT-APPELLEE 

JUDGMENT: 

AFFIRMED

Criminal Appeal from the 

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas 

Case No. CR-14-588304-A 

BEFORE: Stewart, J., E.T. Gallagher, P.J., and Boyle, J. 

RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: May 12, 2016 
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

Timothy J. McGinty 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

Daniel T. Van 

Assistant County Prosecutor 

Justice Center, 8th Floor 

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, OH 44113 

 

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Robert L. Tobik 

Cuyahoga County Public Defender 

John T. Martin 

Assistant Public Defender 

310 West Lakeside Avenue, Suite 200 

Cleveland, OH 44113 
MELODY J. STEWART, J.: 

{¶1} On August 14, 2014, defendant-appellee Steve White was indicted on 

charges of rape and kidnapping stemming from conduct that occurred 20 years earlier in 

August 1994. White pleaded guilty to one count of rape in exchange for the dismissal of 

the remaining charges and the trial court sentenced him to a six-year prison term and 

postrelease control in accordance with the sentencing provisions of 2011 Am.Sub.H.B. 

No. 86 (H.B. 86). 

{¶2} The state argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it sentenced White 

under the current sentencing law, H.B. 86, rather than the sentencing laws in effect at the 

time of the offense. We have previously reviewed this assigned error and have 

consistently held that a defendant in White’s position is to be sentenced under the 

sentencing provisions of H.B. 86. State v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 102377, 

2015-Ohio-4372; State v. Bell, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 102141, 2015-Ohio-4178; State v. 

Owens, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 102276, 2015-Ohio-3881; State v. Girts, 8th Dist. 

Cuyahoga No. 101075, 2014-Ohio-5545; State v. Jackson, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 

100877, 2014-Ohio-5137. The state acknowledges this court’s settled position and 

concedes that it appeals only to preserve the assigned error pending the resolution of State 

v. Thomas, 143 Ohio St.3d 1463, 2015-Ohio-3733, 37 N.E.3d 1249. Accordingly, the 

assignment of error is overruled. 

{¶3} Judgment affirmed. 

It is ordered that appellee recover of said appellant costs herein taxed. 
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal. 

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common 

pleas court to carry this judgment into execution. 

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of 

the Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

______________________________________________ 

MELODY J. STEWART, JUDGE 

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, P.J., and 

MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,379)
<INVENTORY>                                     44,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,796
<PP&E>                                           3,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,997
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,824
<SALES>                                         38,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,575
<CGS>                                           32,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (519)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,558
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,558
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 12.2**

** **

**302 CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Alfredo Ergas S., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 20-F of ENERSIS S.A.;

 

2.     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   [paragraphomitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

 

(c)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)   Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s Board of Directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March 16, 2006

 

 
|   | /s/ Alfredo Ergas S.    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Alfredo Ergas S.        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----