alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         437,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  312,844
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,109
<INVENTORY>                                    351,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,127,498
<PP&E>                                       2,529,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                 453,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,203,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          716,833
<BONDS>                                        469,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    488,397
<COMMON>                                     9,823,872
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,312,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,203,999
<SALES>                                        485,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               489,196
<CGS>                                          448,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  448,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               433,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (416,548)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (416,548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (416,548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (416,548)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
[No. 25465-8-III.

Division Three.

September 27, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eric Allen Hamilton, *Appellant.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 06-1-00353-9, Carrie L. Run ge and Cameron Mitchell, JJ., entered August 10 and September 5, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kulik, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Stephens, J.
[No. 56954-6-I.

Division One.

August 27, 2007.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Carmen P. Rockwell, *Respondent,*and Peter G. Rockwell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 04-3-03334-2, James A. Doerty, J., entered August 4 and 26, 2005. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Appelwick, C.J., concurred in by Grosse and Dwyer, JJ. Now published at 141 Wn. App. 235.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Glen T. Senk, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-K of Urban Outfitters, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended January 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: April 1, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    GLEN T. SENK
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Glen T. Senk (Principal Executive Officer)
frhc_ex404





 







EXHIBIT 4.04


 



AGREEMENT TO FURNISH INSTRUMENTS AND AGREEMENT



DEFINING RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF LONG-TERM DEBT


 


 


July
13, 2020


 


Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
D.C. 20549


 



RE:            

Freedom Holding
Corp – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2020






 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


Freedom
Holding Corp, a Nevada corporation (“FRHC”) , is today
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Commission”) its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 (the “FRHC 2020 Form
10-K”).


 


Pursuant to the
instructions relating to Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of
Regulation S-K, FRHC hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission,
upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the
rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term debt of
its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as
exhibits to FRHC 2020 Form 10-K. The amount of debt authorized
under any such instrument, other than those filed or incorporated
by reference as an exhibit to the FRHC 2020 Form 10-K, does not
exceed 10% of the total assets of FRHC and its consolidated
subsidiaries.


 


Very
truly yours,


 


FREEDOM
HOLDING CORP.


 


 


 


/s/ Evgeniy
Ler 


Evgeniy
Ler


Chief
Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermaine Lavonne CHASE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7840.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2007.

Decided: March 23, 2007.

Jermaine Lavonne Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded with instructions by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Lavonne Chase appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct clerical error. Specifically, Chase seeks to have the Amended Judgment entered November 3, 2000, corrected to include his convictions for aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000) relative to Counts 4 and 68.* As the district court recognized, *254all four substantive drug charges, *i.e.*the two possession charges and the two aiding and abetting charges, are incorporated in Chase’s Amended Judgment, by virtue of their inclusion in Counts 4 and 68. However, Chase is correct that the Amended Judgment does not directly reference his conviction of § 2 relative to either Count 4 or 68. Therefore, we vacate the district court’s denial of Chase’s Rule 36 motion, and direct that the district court correct the Amended Judgment pursuant to Rule 36. This correction, of course, will have no effect on Chase’s term of imprisonment or term of supervised release, nor will it restart the limitations period for filing a post-conviction challenge under the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. We deny Chase’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.*

*

 Chase's original Judgment Order reflected the § 2 convictions in Counts 4 and 68, but the Amended Judgment omitted direct reference to the aiding and abetting convictions in the “Title & Section” and "Nature of Offense” sections of the Amended Judgment Order. Specifically, the prior Judgment Order, in pertinent part, reads as follows:

Title & Section Nature of Offense Date Offense Concluded Count Numbers

21:841(a)(l), Distribution of cocaine, 1/8/93 4

(b)(1)(C); 18:2 aid and abet 8/30/94 68

In contrast, the November 3, 2000 Amended Judgment Order, in pertinent part, reads as follows:

ADDITIONAL COUNTS OF CONVICTION

Title & Section Nature of Offense Date Offense Concluded Count Numbers 21: U.S.C. 841(a)(1) Possess with intent to distribute cocaine base 1/8/93 4

*254*21*U.S.C. 841(a)(1) Possess with intent to distribute cocaine powder 8/30/94 68
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 97-30329

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

DAVID H. HUGHES and TYRONE G. CLARK,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

AMERICAN PUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.,

Defendants,

AMERICAN PUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

DENTA-CARE MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION, INC.,

DENTA-CARE MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATION, INC.,

JOHNNY H. WILLIAMSON, and EDWIN R. PEARCE,

Defendant-Appellees.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(95-CV-194)

______________________________________________________

September 18, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of

the district court's well-reasoned ruling of February 20, 1997.

AFFIRMED.
2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T W EST A M ERI CA N I N SU RA N CE C O M P A N Y , an O hi o c orpor a t i on, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. J USTI N L. HERNAN DEZ an d DA NI EL A A. HERNAN DEZ, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 35278 D. C . No . 6 : 0 7 - c v - 0 1 4 4 7 - AA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon A nn L . A i ke n, C hi e f

D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y10, 2012 ** P ort l a nd, O r e gon B efo re: K O Z IN S K I, C h i ef Ju d g e, T A L L M A N an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED MA Y14 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng W es tA m er i can Insurance C om pany’ s m ot i on s und erR ul es 60 (b), 62 , and 6 7 o f the F eder al R ul es o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e . W e s t A m e r ic a n ’s m o tio n to r e s o lv e ad is p u te r e g a r d in g its ent i t l em entt o the $1 70 , 00 0 j ud gm entun der the m ort gage cl ause soug htre l i ef that w a s una va i l abl e unde rR ul e 60( b) ( 6) be c aus e i tr e s t e d on ac l a i m tha tw a s not litig a te da s p a rt o f

th e u n d e r ly in g ju d g m e n t. Se e D e layv . G ordon , 475 F . 3d 1039, 1 0 4 4

– 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ; s e e al s o U ni te d State s v . $119, 980 , 680 F . 2d 106, 107–08 ( 11th C i r . 1982) . W e s tA m e r i c a n di d notappe a l the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s pr i orde ni a l s of i t s m ot i on t o a dj udi c a t e tha tdi s put e , a nd R ul e 60( b) i s nota va i l abl e f or a d ju d ic a tio n o f

c la im s n o t a d

ju d ic a te din th e u n d e r ly in g o r d e ro rju d g m e n t. See D e lay , 475 F . 3d a t1046–47. N orw a s r e l i e f a va i l abl e unde rR ul e 60( b) ( 5) : T he j ud gm enthad n ot“ been sa t i sf i ed, re l ea se d o r di sc harged, ” and ci rc um st ance s had n o t c h a n g e d s in c e th e ju d g m e n t w a s e n te r e ds u c h th a t “ap p ly in g it p r o s p e c tiv e ly [w as ] no l on ger e qu i t abl e. ” F ed. R . C i v. P . 60 (b)( 5). W e s tA m e r i c a n’ s m ot i ons unde rR ul e s 62 a nd 67 be c a m e m ootw he n the di s tr i c tc ourtde c i de d i t s R ul e 60( b) m ot i on. A FFI R M ED .
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 1, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 1, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    PHILIP W. ROIZINPhilip W. Roizin Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, Treasurer and Secretary and Chief Financial Officer




Dated: December 16, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4511]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 36 / Thursday, February 22, 2001 / 
Notices

[[Page 11136]]



BARRY GOLDWATER SCHOLARSHIP AND EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

Time and Date: 2 pm, Wednesday, March 28, 2001.

Place: Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20510.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Review and approval of the minutes of the March 15th, 2000 Board 
of Trustees meeting.
    2. Report on financial status of the Foundation fund--
    A. Review of investment policy and current portfolio.
    3. Report on results of Scholarship Review Panel--
    A. Discussion and consideration of scholarship candidates.
    B. Selection of Goldwater Scholars.
    4. Other Business brought before the Board of Trustees.

Contact Person for More Information: Gerald J. Smith, President, 
Telephone: (703) 756-6012.

Gerald J. Smith,
President.
[FR Doc. 01-4511 Filed 2-20-01; 1:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 4738-91-M
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




CFO Certification. In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Aviation
Services Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael D. Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael D. Davidson
Chief Financial Officer
September 12, 2003
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 44 6 . MI CHAEL CHARLES W ARD v . THE STATE.

A ju ry c o n v i c t e d M i ch ael Ch arl es W ard o f po s ses s i o n o f t o o l s i n t h e

co m m i s s io n o f a cri m e an d h e was s en t en ced in Au g u s t 2 0 09 t o fi ve y ears p ro b at i o n.

In Sep t em

b er 20 2 1

, Wa r d f

i l e d a m o t i o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap peal

, w h i ch t h e t ri al

co u rt d en i ed o n Decem

b er 2 0, 2 0 21

. On Jan u ary 2 8

, 2 0 2 2

, W ard fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r

reco n s i d erat i on , wh i ch t he co u rt d en i ed o n Feb ru ary 1 5, 2 0 2 2 . On M arch 1 7 , 2 0 2 2,

W ard fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal s eek i n g rev i ew o f t h e Feb ru ary 1 5 ord er. W e, h o wev er,

l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. A n o t i ce o f ap peal m

u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry of t h e o rd er s o u g h t to

b e ap p eal ed

. O CGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). “ Th e p ro p er an d ti m el y fi l in g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

i s an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s di ct io n u p o n an ap p el l at e co urt .” Per l ma n

v. P er lma n , 3 1 8 G a. Ap p

. 7 3 1

, 7 3 9 (4 ) (7 3 4 SE2 d 5 6 0 ) (2 0 1 2) (p u n ct u at i o n o m i t t ed ).

Fu rt h er, th e fi l in g o f a m o ti on fo r reco n s id erat i o n d o es no t ex t en d th e t i m e fo r fi l i n g

a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

, an d t h e d en i al o f a m o t i o n fo r reco n s i d erat i o n i s n o t i t s el f a

d i rect l y ap peal a b l e j u d g m en t. See St a t e v. W h i t e , 28 2 Ga. 8 5 9

, 8 6 0 (1 ) (6 5 5 SE2 d

5 7 5 ) (2 00 8 ); Bel l v. Co h r a n , 2 4 4 Ga. Ap p

. 5 10

, 51 1 (5 3 6 SE2 d 1 8 7) (2 0 0 0 ). W ard

fi led h i s n o t i ce o f ap p eal 8 7 d ay s aft er t h e Decem b e r 2 0

, 2 0 2 1 o rd er d en y i n g h i s

m o ti o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. Th u s , t h e n ot i ce i s u n t i m el y as t o t h at o rd er. 1 An d

W ard ’ s no ti ce o f ap p eal is i n v al i d as t o t h e Feb ru ary 1 5 o rd er d en y i n g h is m o t i o n fo r

1 W e al s o no t e t h at t h e Geo rg i a Su p rem e Co urt recen t l y d et erm i ned t h at a t ri al

co u rt l ack s au t h o ri t y t o g ran t an o ut -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. C o o k v. S t a t e ,

_ __ Ga.

_ _ _ (5 ) (8 7 0 SE2 d 7 5 8 , 7 8 2 -7 8 3 ) (2 0 2 2). June 09, 2022r eco n s i d erat i o n

. Acco rd i ng l y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ac k o f

ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.
W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 06/09/2022
% Discoloration 

30r------- - - --------- - - - ~ 

25 I • • • • · • • • • • • • • • · • • · • • • • · · • • • • • • • • • · • • • • • • • · --. • · . •._ 

20 t • · • • • • • · • • • • • • • • • · • • · • • · ,r• • · • · • • • · • . ••• . • .,• • .• . .. •• 

1 5 1 • • • • · • • • • • • • • • • · Y· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · , . · · · . . · . ... . . . ... . ~ 

10 ~ 

5 I.A'· ., .. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . .. . .... . .... . ... . . . . 

0:---:--- -------- ----- -___J 0 ~ ~ . ·, 2 4 8 

Days of Storage 

Figure 4 .6 Interaction of fat level by storage time tor product surface discolo ration 
% Discoloration 

30r--------------------,I( 

25 

20 

15, · 

10 

5 

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · 

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -1 

--LFO 

+LF1 0 

*HFO 

-<>- HF10 

0'-------------------_J 0 ~ - l 2 4 8 

Days of Storage 

Figure 4.5 Interaction of treatment by storage time for product surface discoloration 
Hunter "a" Value 

18------------- ---- ----- ~ 

1 6 

- LFO 

+LF10 

141;1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 

12t •· ··· · ·········· · · · · · ····· · ··· · ·· · ········'-··· · ·· · 

* HFO 

-o- HF10 

10L--------------------' 

0 1 2 4 8 

Days of Storage 

Figure 4.4 Interaction of treatment by storage time for Hunter "a" values 
% Metmyoglobin 

90,-----------------------, 

,, · • • • • · • · • • •. 

70 t · • • • • • • • • • • • • · • • · • • · • • • • • • • • • • • · • - • • · . . • .• • •..,,.• •. •. 

50 I • · · • · · • • • • • • · · • • • · • • • • • · · · • • • • • · · · · · R 

~ 

3 0 I • • • • · • · .__,,,,-r • • · • • • • • • • • • • • • • .,,.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 

10~------------------~ 0 J -

8 1 2 4 

Days of Storage 

Figure 4.3 Interaction of fat level by storage time for product metmyoglobin content 
% Metmyoglobin 

90r----------------------, 

70 t • · · · · • · • • • · • • · • · · • • · · • · · · · · • · · · • · · · · · · • · · • •/• ·,. • • • 

50 I • · • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • · · • • • •• •• 

. . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . .. .. . 

-LFO 

+LF10 

*HF0 

-o- HF10 

10..._____________________J 

0 ,~ -

2 4 8 

Days of Storage 

Figure 4.2 Interaction of treatment by storage time for product metmyoglobin content 
Log CFU/g 

4 .--------- - - ---- -----, 

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .,,. · 

3 I • • • . . • • • • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • •• 

2.51· ···· ··· · ·· · ·· ······ · ····· ·· ···· 

~ ..' . , ....... .............. .. . 

-LFO 

+ LF10 

3.5 , · · 

2 *HFO 

~ HF1 0 1.1;'- ~ 

. . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..' . . . . . . . . 

0.5'-------------------- ---> 

0 1 2 4 8 

Days of Storage 

Figure 4 .1 Interaction of treatment by storage time for lactobacillus-plate-cou nts
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Executive Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael F. AnthonyMichael F. AnthonyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Director




Dated: June 10, 2004