alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         381,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,672
<BONDS>                                        211,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,640
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,887
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (192)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (118)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CEO Certification
 Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)




I, Neil Chan, certify that pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), the 10-K report for IGEN Networks for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the IGEN Networks.
  
  April 30, 2012
 
  /s/ Neil Chan
  Neil Chan
 Director, CEO
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Xr. John C. Ksrburger 

County Attorney, Fayette County 

LaGranee, Texts 

Dear 9lr: 

0pln.ion No. o-1274 

Re: Is a suatloe' 0 

lie have your letter 

opinion from this Departme 

be he14 by reason of the 

were killed by the REUW b 

another white pereon and 

a4 Justice or t 

his duty, to ho1 

the rollorlng ,oa 

man and a neero who 

.in the pn80ne0 0r 

nen who are llvlng. 

ld, or from any eauae 

t andor mntmnas of the 

or aore good wltneaaa5.w 

Tour8 very truly 

ATT- GJNZRAL OF TEXAS 

ATTORNEY GXNWAL OE' TBXAS
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Jason Kulas, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive AutoReceivables Trust 2007-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);     2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in theExchange Act periodic reports;     4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodicreports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in allmaterial respects; and     5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordancewith Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.Date: March 31, 2008         By:  /s/ Jason Kulas    Name:  Jason Kulas    Title:  Chief Financial OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003* In connection with the Annual Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XV (the Registrant) on Form
10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas, the Chief
Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their knowledge, that:  (i)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Registrant. March 24, 2005 By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz,President and Chief Executive Officer ofCronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Registrant/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas,Chief Financial Officer ofCronos Capital Corp,.General Partner of the Registrant
 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE
COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.   *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-6XS (the "Exchange
    Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Central Mortgage Company as Servicer, and GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC
    Mortgage Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-01-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         910
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125
<INVENTORY>                                    59,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               83,516
<PP&E>                                         33,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,044
<BONDS>                                        84,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          9
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,326
<SALES>                                        121,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,868
<CGS>                                          44,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               80,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,642)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,589)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (3.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (3.90)
        


</TABLE>
---

List of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries

|Name                         | Jurisdiction | Business                                     | % of Ownership
|---------------------------- | ------------ | -------------------------------------------- | --------------
|                             |              |                                              |               
|TAG Oil (NZ) Limited         | New Zealand  | Oil and gas exploration                      | 100%          
|                             |              |                                              |               
|TAG Oil (Canterbury) Limited | New Zealand  | Oil and gas exploration                      | 100%          
|                             |              |                                              |               
|Cheal Petroleum Limited      | New Zealand  | Oil and gas exploration and
      production | 100%          

---
0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

2003 

(0.30%)

2004 

(0.17%)

2005 

(0.17%)

2006 

(0.17%)

2007 

(0.24%)

2008 

(0.46%)

2009 

(0.32%)

2010 

(0.24%)

Calendar Year

1st Qtr

2nd Qtr

3rd Qtr

4th Qtr

#

Unweighted 

Percent Positive

Unweighted E. coli O157:H7 percent positive values from 

FSIS Raw Ground Beef Testing Federal, Retail and 

Import Verification and Follow-up Programs 

color-coded by quarter for 2003 to 2010*

(Figure 2)

* This table does not include raw ground beef component samples. 

† Starting with CY2008, annual microbiological results are reported by sample collection date as opposed to analysis end date.

# In Qtr 3 (weeks of Aug 5 through Sept 2) approximately 1,100 fewer sample forms were sent out than were scheduled. 

Note: The source of the data included in this table are the microbiological results of raw ground beef products analyzed for 

Escherichia coli O157:H7 and can be found at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Science/Ecoli_O157_Summary_Tables/index.asp.

†
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novastar Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Metz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
 Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Gregory S. Metz    
|                     |  | Gregory S. Metz        
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard
contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 64

DAVID FERNANDO MORENO * September Term, 20 20

ORDER

Upon conside r ation of th e J o int Petition for 60

- Day Suspension by C onsent filed by

the Attorney Gr ievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, David Fernando

Moreno

, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19

- 736, in which the Respondent admits t hat he violated

Rules 1.1, 1.3 , 1.4, 1.16, and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Attorne ys ’ Rules of Professional

Conduct

, it is this 4th day of January

, 202 1

O RDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, David

Fernando Moreno, be a nd hereby is immediately suspended from th e practice of law for a

period of 60 days ; and it is further

ORDERED

, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the nam e of David Fernando

Moreno from the register o f attorneys in th is Court, and certify that fact to the Trustees of

the Client Protecti on Fund of the Bar of M aryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in

this State in accordance with Maryland R ule 19

- 761

.

/s/ Robert N. McDonald

Senior J udge
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Crystallex International Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, as amended (the "Report"), Gordon Thompson, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and****Hemdat Sawh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

 (1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

/S/GORDONTHOMPSON
| Name: | Gordon Thompson |  
Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  

June 27, 2007

 
 

 

/S/HEMDATSAWH          

Name:

Hemdat Sawh

 
Title:

Chief Financial Officer

Date:

June 27, 2007

 
 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

 

 

1

 

 

  |
|-------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11505 Summary Calendar

WILLIAM GALLAHER, II,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. CITY OF MAYPEARL, TEXAS,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CV

- 1400

Before DAVIS, HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
In this § 1983 suit, William Gallaher alleged that former City of Maypearl (“City”) police officer Shahid Mohamad violated his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments by engaging in excessive force and false

arrest following a pullover of his vehicle on May 27, 2015. The plaintiff sued both the City and Officer Mohamad. T he City moved to dismiss under Fed eral

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the l imited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 8, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11505 Document: 00515024907 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2019No. 18

- 11505

2 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim , which the district court granted. Gallaher later dismissed Officer Mohamad without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1) . This appeal followed. Except in rare circumstances appro v ed by the Sup reme Court and as set out in Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Proce dure, we only have jurisdiction to review final orders of the district court. In Ryan v. O c cidental Petroleum Corp. , we held that when the district court dismisses certain claims

w ith prejudice and the plaintiff then voluntarily dismisses the remaining
claims without prejudice , we do not have appellate jurisdiction to review the appeal. 577 F.2d 298, 301

– 02 (5th Cir. 1978). We reason ed that the judgment was not final because the p laintiff did not face an adverse ruling on his entire case in light of plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of certain claims which formed the bases of his complaint

. Id. Ryan controls this case. Because plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his case against Officer Mohamad without prejudice , plaintiff did not suffer an adverse ruling as to this defendant and was entitled to pursue another action against him. Thus, the judgment app ealed from is not a final judgment , and we must
dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED

. Case: 18-11505 Document: 00515024907 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2019
##### 



Exhibit 2.2
EXECUTION VERSION
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 Amendment Seller Buyer AECH Purchase Agreement
 R E C I T A L S
 Company
  Parties
 A G R E E M E N T
  Amendment to Article II of the Purchase Agreement
 Loan Documents
 Amendment to Section 4.4 of the Purchase Agreement




---



##### 



Amendment to Section 4.10 of the Purchase Agreement
  Intentionally Omitted
  Use, Redemption and Destruction of Chips
 Amendment to Section 4.23(a) of the Purchase Agreement
 Other Properties D&O/EPL Policy
 2




---



##### 



provided however
 Amendment to Section 4.17(c) of the Purchase Agreement
 provided however
 Amendment to Article IV of the Purchase Agreement
 Escrow of Development Taxes
 Development
Tax Bank Account
  3




---



##### 



Escrowed Development Taxes
 Litigation Excluded
Litigation
 Amendment to Section 7.1(b) of the Purchase Agreement
  Amendment to Section 7.2(a) of the Purchase Agreement
   4




---



##### 



Amendment to Section 7.6 of the Purchase Agreement
     Amendment to Section 7.8(b) of the Purchase Agreement
  Amendment to Section 9.1 of the Purchase Agreement
  Adjusted Working Capital less provided however
 5




---



##### 



Development Taxes Development Tax Recipients Development Agreements
 Amendment to Seller Disclosure Letter.
 General
 mutatis mutandum
  6




---



##### 



Signatures on following page
 7




---



##### 



RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLCBy:Name:Title:AMERISTAR CASINOS, INC.By:Name:Title:AMERISTAR EAST CHICAGO HOLDINGS, LLCBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 SECTION 4.27
 1.
    
    Resorts International Holdings, LLC and RIH Acquisitions IN, LLC v. Federal Insurance
Co. Action against insurance carrier seeking a declaration that losses sustained by
Resorts International Holdings, LLC in a sophisticated criminal employee cheating scam are
covered by an insurance policy issued by Federal Insurance Co.
 2.
    
    Omar Abbas v. Colony Capital, LLC and RIH Acquisitions IN, LLC. Claim by Abbas
alleging that he was forcefully dragged from his hotel room at Resorts East Chicago and taken
down to the lobby. The Depart of Immigration and Naturalization Services currently has a
retainer as Abbas is a Jordanian national. Colony Capital, LLC and RIH Acquisitions IN, LLC
have filed a motion for summary judgment.