alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Back to Contents

Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Todd Bruce, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Crystallex International Corporation (the “registrant”), certify that:

1. Based on my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A  No.
4 for the year ended December 31, 2003 (“Form 20-F”), of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information contained in Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Date: March 16, 2005

/s/ Todd Bruce 
  Todd Bruce
  President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crystallex International Corporation and will be retained by such corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### JOSEPH RUSKIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ARTHUR J. CALE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey. Appellate Division

Argued January 8, 1951 —

Decided January 24, 1951.

*350Before Judges Freund, Proctor and Rogers.

*Mr. Leslie S. Kohn*argued the cause for the appellant *(Mr. Harry Potter,*attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rogers, J. A. D.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for wages in the Wage Collection Division of the New Jersey Department of Labor and Industry and defendant appealed to the County Court. Defendant now appeals from the judgment of that court dismissing the appeal for lack of prosecution on plaintiff’s motion and denying defendant’s motion to fix a *351date for hearing his appeal. Plaintiff did not respond to the appeal.

The proceeding was in pursuance of *B. 8.*34:11-57 *et seq.*The appeal was perfected in January, 1950, and the motions for dismissal and for a hearing date were made and disposed of in June. The only provision of the statute relating to timely prosecution of appeals is contained in section 63 and reads:

“Either party may bring on the hearing of the appeal at term time or in vacation upon ten days’ notice to the other party or his attorney.”

This appeal presents the narrow question of the propriety of the dismissal over objection of an appeal .in a statutory proceeding for lack of prosecution for about five months where the statute affords either party the right to move for hearing upon short notice to the other. The statutory method for moving an appeal appears to be apt, fair and expeditious, and there is no other prescribed requirement for prosecution. Unless there are special meritorious circumstances to the contrary the court should require the parties’ compliance with the statutory procedure; and certainly this is so in an instance where, as here, a counter-motion to fix a date for hearing was before the court. The statute authorized the defendant to move for a hearing date and the court was required to fix it. That motion clearly countered any inference of defendant’s intention to abandon the appeal deducible from the delay of five months, and there was no evidence that in fact the appeal had been abandoned.

The judgment is reversed.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 12.1


                             AVONDALE INCORPORATED
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                     FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                         ------------------------------------------
                                          1999     2000     2001     2002     2003
                                         ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
<S>                                      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                        $23.0    $20.2    $20.4    $17.7   $ 18.2
  Discount and expenses on sale of
    accounts receivable                     5.6      5.6      4.9      1.1      2.6
  Loss on extinguishment of debt             --       --       --       --      3.2
  Amortization of debt issuance costs       1.1      1.1      1.0      0.7      0.9
                                          -----    -----    -----    -----   ------
    Fixed Charges                         $29.7    $26.9    $26.3    $19.5   $ 24.9
                                          =====    =====    =====    =====   ======


Earnings
  Pretax income (loss) before
     extraordinary item                   $16.3    $51.6    $ 1.8    $(0.4)  $(12.2)
  Fixed charges                            29.7     26.9     26.3     19.5     24.9
                                          -----    -----    -----    -----   ------
    Earnings                              $46.0    $78.5    $28.1    $19.1   $ 12.7
                                          =====    =====    =====    =====   ======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          1.5x     2.9x     1.1x      --       --
</Table>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Mark Jessee, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Retirement Villas Properties II, a California Limited Partnership;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actionswith regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: August16, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60198

Summary Calendar

 

ALEXEI IVANOV,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

USDC No. A70-690-548

- - - - - - - - - -

February 4, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alexei Ivanov petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum

and for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the

record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is

supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,

78 F.3d 194 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is

DENIED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2015

NO. 03-14-00039-CV

Tower Car Wash, Inc., Appellant

v.

Westport Group, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 24, 2013. The parties 

have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court 

agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses 

the appeal. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the 

court below.
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                     Subsidiaries of Ameristar Casinos, Inc.


1.   Cactus Pete's, Inc., a Nevada corporation

2.   Ameristar Casino Vicksburg, Inc., a Mississippi corporation

3.   Ameristar Casino Council Bluffs, Inc., an Iowa corporation

4.   Ameristar Casino Las Vegas, Inc., a Nevada corporation

5.   A.C. Food Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation

6.   Ameristar Casino St. Louis, Inc., a Missouri corporation

7.   Ameristar Casino St. Charles, Inc., a Missouri corporation

8.   Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., a Missouri corporation
|    |                                                                                                                                   |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/             Steven E. Brown |
|   | Steven E. Brown |
|   | Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | May 6, 2011 |
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11285-11286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-381-008]


Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.; Notice of Filing of Refund 
Report

February 16, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 9, 2001 Wyoming Interstate Company, 
Ltd. (WIC) filed a refund report in Docket No. RP99-381-000, et al.
    WIC states that the filing and refunds were made to comply with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Order of September 
27, 2000. These amounts were paid by WIC on December 11, 2000.
    WIC states that the refund report summarizes transportation refund

[[Page 11286]]

amounts for the period January 1, 2000 through October 31, 2000 
pursuant to Article VI of WIC's Stipulation and Agreement as approved 
in the Commission's September 27, 2000 Order.
    WIC states that the copies of WIC's filing are being mailed to all 
holders of the tariff and to public bodies and that the filing is 
available for public inspection at WIC's offices in Colorado Springs, 
Colorado.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before February 23, 2001. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4509 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40101

Summary Calendar

THOMAS GREISAMER, MD

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL AT GALVESTON; GEORGE T. BRYAN,

MD; JOAN C. LANG, MD; JAN BLALAOCK, PhD

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(G-96-CV-18)

May 30, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Plaintiff-Appellant sought damages from Defendants-Appellees

claiming discrimination under Title IX, Title VII and § 1983, and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Defendants moved to

dismiss and for summary judgment. The district court granted the

motion to dismiss as to Bryan, Lang and Blaylock and as to all
2

defendants dismissed claims asserted under § 1983. Appellant does

not argue these claims or his Title IX claim on appeal. The

district court granted summary judgment in favor of the University

and only the claims against it under Title VII and the ADEA remain.

We have conducted a de novo review of the record and find no error.

Plaintiff offered no competent evidence to create any issue of

material fact. Additionally, the University offered a nonpretextual reason for not renewing Dr. Greisamer’s contract as a

resident in psychiatry. Appellant contends that the district court

terminated discovery thereby depriving him of the opportunity to

gain information to create an issue of fact. This argument is not

persuasive. There were ten months during which discovery was

conducted. Additionally, Plaintiff did not suggest to the trial

court that he needed more time for discovery, nor does he suggest

to this court what information he would expect more discovery to

produce that he could use to create an issue of material fact.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 1, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 1, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MICHAEL F. ANTHONYMichael F. Anthony Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Director




Dated: December 16, 2003
[Nos. 58201-1-I; 58202-0-I.

Division One.

August 13, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Angey L. McKinney, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, Nos. 05-1-01973-0 and 05-1-01245-1, Thomas J. Wynne, J., entered May 2, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY


         The undersigned, being the duly elected, qualified and acting Secretary
of Landsing Pacific Fund. Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Fund"), does hereby
certify  that at a meeting of the Fund's  Board of  Directors,  duly  called and
noticed,  which was held on March 27, 1995,  the Board of Directors  adopted the
following amendment to the Bylaws:

                  Article III,  Section 2 of the Bylaws was deleted and replaced
                  by the following:

                           "Section 2.  Number;  Tenure.  The Board of Directors
                       shall be  comprised  of  between  three  (3) and nine (9)
                       members,  the exact  number to be fixed from time to time
                       by  resolution  of the  Board of  Directors,  all of whom
                       shall be over the age of  eighteen  (18) and who need not
                       be  stockholders.  Each director shall be elected to hold
                       office until the next annual meeting of stockholders  and
                       until the election and qualification of their successor."


         I further  certify that at a meeting of the Fund's Board of  Directors,
duly called and noticed, which was held on July 27, 1995, the Board of Directors
adopted the following amendment to the Bylaws:

                  Article II,  Section 2 of the Bylaws was deleted and  replaced
                  by the following:

                           "Section 2. Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of the
                       stockholders  of the  Corporation  shall  be held on such
                       date and at such time as may be  determined  by the Board
                       of Directors, during the month of October in each year."


         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  subscribed  my  name  this  10th  day of
November, 1995.


                                              /s/ Dean Banks
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Dean Banks, Secretary
    

                                  -17-
SCHEDULE P Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Changes of Interests

(Form 8865) in a Foreign Partnership

OMB No. 1545-1668

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  Attach To Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

Name of person filing Form 8865 Filer’s identifying number

Acquisitions

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25943Q Schedule P (Form 8865) 2002

Part I

Part II

(under section 6046A)

(e)

% of interest

before acquisition

(b)

Date of acquisition

(a)

Name, address, and identifying number of

person from whom your interest was acquired

Dispositions

Part III Change in Proportional Interest

Part IV

(c)

FMV of

interest acquired

(d)

Basis in

interest acquired

(f)

% of interest

after acquisition

(a)

Description of change

Name of foreign partnership

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions)

(e)

% of interest

before disposition

(b)

Date of disposition

(c)

FMV of

interest disposed

(d)

Basis in

interest disposed

(f)

% of interest

after disposition

(a)

Name, address, and identifying number of

person who acquired your interest

(e)

% of interest

before change

(b)

Date of change

(c)

FMV of

interest

(d)

Basis in

interest

(f)

% of interest

after change

2002
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
      (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
      general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.









/s/
      Neal Ludeke


Neal
      Ludeke


Chief
      Financial Officer of Richman Tax


Credit
      Properties Inc., general partner of


Richman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., general


partner
      of the Registrant


March
      14,
      2008