alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio REYES-NAVARRO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50438.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 2013.*

Filed April 10, 2014.

Lawrence Casper, Assistant U.S., Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Harini P. Raghupathi, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Antonio Reyes-Navarro appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Reyes-Navarro contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. We review for abuse of discretion. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The district court did not abuse its discretion. The 48-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, including Reyes-Navarro’s criminal history and the need to protect the public, promote respect for the law, and provide deterrence. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586. It was not illogical for the district court ultimately to impose a higher sentence in the hope that the higher sentence would deter Reyes-Navarro from illegally reentering the United States again, and it was permissible for the district court to place more weight on the need to protect the public given the many times that Reyes-Navarro had returned to the United States and driven under the influence. *See United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez,*587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir.2009) (recognizing that the “weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the district court” and holding that the district court did not place undue weight on the need for deterrence where the defendant repeatedly entered the United States illegally); *see also United States v. Treadwell,*593 F.3d 990, 1014 (9th Cir.*5322010) (holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by determining that deterrence and protection of the public outweighed other § 3553(a) factors where court had evidence that defendant was a likely repeat offender who posed a substantial risk to others).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Manjeedh SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73277.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Martin Avila Robles, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Michele Y.F. Sarko, Esq., Jocelyn Lopez Wright, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Manjeedh Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. *671Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Oh v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reconsider as untimely because it was filed more than eleven years after the BIA issued its final order of removal. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2) (requiring that motions for reconsideration be filed within 30 days of the BIA’s final decision or by July 31, 1996, whichever is later).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its *sua sponte*authority to reconsider. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2689 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2689

 To amend Public Law 100-518 and the United States Grain Standards Act 
  to extend through September 30, 1998, the authority of the Federal 
 Grain Inspection Service to collect fees to cover administrative and 
               supervisory costs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1993

Mr. de la Garza (by request) (Mr. Roberts, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, 
Mr. Penny, Mr. Emerson, and Mr. Allard) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend Public Law 100-518 and the United States Grain Standards Act 
  to extend through September 30, 1998, the authority of the Federal 
 Grain Inspection Service to collect fees to cover administrative and 
               supervisory costs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2 of 
Public Law 100-518 (102 Stat. 2584) is amended by striking out in the 
introductory clause ``Effective for the period October 1, 1988, through 
September 30, 1993, inclusive,'' and inserting in lieu therefore 
``Effective for the period October 1, 1988, through September 30, 1988, 
inclusive,''.
    Sec. 2. Effective for the period beginning with the date of 
enactment of this Act or October 1, 1993, whichever shall sooner occur, 
and ending September 30, 1998, the United States Grain Standards Act, 
as amended by the United States Grain Standards Act Amendments of 1988 
(Public Law 100-518; 102 Stat. 2584) is further amended;
            (1) in section 7D (7 U.S.C. 79d) by striking out ``for each 
        of the fiscal years 1989 through 1993'' and inserting in lieu 
        thereof ``for each of the fiscal years 1989 through 1998'';
            (2) in section 19 (7 U.S.C. 89h) by striking out ``during 
        the period beginning October 1, 1988, and ending September 30, 
        1993, to the extent that financing is not obtained from fees 
        and sales of samples as provided for in sections 7, 7A, and 17A 
        of this Act'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``during the period 
        beginning October 1, 1988, and ending September 30, 1998, to 
        the extent that financing is not obtained from fees and sales 
        of samples as provided for in sections 7, 7A, 7B, and 17A of 
        this Act''; and
            (3) by striking out section 21 (7 U.S.C. 87j).

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Y. McGovern, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 14, 2003
                                    /s/ Michael Y. McGovern
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Michael Y. McGovern
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pioneer Companies, Inc. and will be retained by Pioneer Companies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
2007-0768.

#### Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Smith.

On August 29, 2007, this court permanently disbarred respondent, Richard Ford Smith Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0018125, last known address in Cleveland, Ohio, from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(1).

On September 17, 2009, relator, Cuyahoga County Bar Association, filed with this court a motion for an order to appear and show cause why respondent should not be found in contempt for failing to obey this court’s August 29, 2007 order of disbarment.

On November 3, 2009, this court ordered respondent to appear in person before the court on December 1, 2009. Respondent appeared before the court on the scheduled date. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by this court that respondent is found in contempt. It is further ordered that respondent is fined $2,000 ($1,000 for each of the two appearances set forth in relator’s motion); however, $1,000 of the fine will be waived if respondent enters into an agreement, within 30 days of the date of this order, with the Clients Security Fund for repayment of the full amount of all awards made against him by the fund. Respondent shall begin payment within 30 days of the date of this order, and full repayment to the Clients Security Fund of all awards against respondent must be made within two years of the date of this order. At the end of the two-year period, respondent shall file proof with the court that he has fully reimbursed the fund. If respondent fails to reimburse the fund for all awards against him within two years of the date of this order, the remaining $1,000 of the fine will be imposed.

It is further ordered that respondent shall pay $1,000 of the fine to the Clerk’s Office within 90 days of the date of this order. If the fine is not paid within 90 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum shall accrue on the unpaid fine, and the matter will be referred to the office of the Attorney General for collection.

It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings. All case documents are subject to Rules 44 through 47 of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, which govern access to court records.

It is further ordered, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order and all other orders in this case to respondent’s last known address.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Connor, JJ., concur in the sanction but would allow the entire $2,000 fine to be waived if respondent repays the full amount of all awards made against him by the Clients Security Fund.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has approved the 114 acre expansion of the Ninigret National Wildlife Refuge.

# DATES:

This action was effective on February 9, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Andrew French, Chief, Division of Realty, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2nd Floor, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts. Telephone 413-253-8590.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This property has been identified as the preferred site for the proposed Rhode Island National Wildlife Complex visitor center. The property is also within the boundary of all the proposed alternatives of the draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan currently proposed for the Rhode Island Complex.

Based on the information contained in the decision document, a categorical exclusion was signed on December 20, 2000, by the Regional Director.

Dated: February 9, 2001.

Marshall P. Jones, Jr.,

Acting Director.

[FR Doc. 01-4356 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         338,308
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            18,020,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,890,425
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     65,951,808
<ALLOWANCE>                                    998,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,511,076
<DEPOSITS>                                  84,777,659
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            660,563
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       951,580
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,121,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              94,511,076
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,863,258
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              433,743
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               421,915
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,718,916
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,512,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,517,361
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,201,555
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  375,651
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,312,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                726,681
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     726,681
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   726,681
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.01
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               674,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   52,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              998,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           998,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.02





Certification





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”)
      of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
      10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 15, 2007


By:
              /s/
                  James McDadeJames
                  McDade
                Chief
                    Financial Officer


The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code).
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 4 0 9 1 6 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

H E C T O R R U I Z
, a l s o k n o w n a s H e c t o r R u i z

- P e r e z ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 5 : 1 0

- C R

- 1 1 6 7

- 1

B e f o r e R E A V L E Y
, D E N N I S
, a n d C L E M E N T
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t H e c t o r R u i z h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )
, a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h

C i r

. 2 0 1 1 )

. R u i z h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e

. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f a n d t h e

r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d t h e r e i n , a s w e l l a s R u i z ’ s r e s p o n s e

. W e

c o n c u r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e
f o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w

. R u i z ’ s p r o s e r e s p o n s e a r g u i n g t h a t c o u n s e l w a s i n e f f e c t i v e U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 16 , 20 11
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40916 Document: 00511510827 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2011N o

. 1 0

- 4 0 9 1 6

f o r n o t d e m o n s t r a t i n g t h e i n v a l i d i t y o f a p r i o r c o n v i c t i o n d o e s n o t p r e s e n t a

n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D
,

c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S

D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-40916 Document: 00511510827 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2011
EX-10.1






					
	



	  	 22 Boston Wharf Rd, 9th floor

Boston, MA 02210

www.akceatx.com
	  	

  
  

			
	June 18, 2020	  	Exhibit 10.1

 William Andrews, MD 
 Hopkinton,
MA 01748 
 Dear William: 
 It is my pleasure to extend to you
an offer to join Akcea Therapeutics, Inc., as Chief Medical Officer reporting to me. We anticipate your start date will be Tuesday July 7, 2020. 
 In
this position, you will receive an annual base salary of $460,000. You are also eligible for an annual incentive bonus targeted at 50% of your base salary under our current Management by Objectives (MBO) program. 

As additional incentive, the Company will grant you 250,000 stock options and 37,500 restricted stock units (RSUs). The exercise price of the options will be
equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock in accordance with the terms set out in the Akcea equity incentive plan, and the options and restricted stock units will be issued under, and subject to, the terms of the Akcea equity
incentive plan. The options will vest 25% on the first anniversary of your Start Date and then in equal monthly installments over the next three years. The RSUs will also vest over four years with 25% vesting annually on each anniversary of your
Start Date. 
 You will also receive a one-time signing bonus of $25,000 which will be made payable to you with your
first paycheck. One hundred percent (100%) of this bonus will be paid back to Akcea Therapeutics should you voluntarily leave prior to your 1 year anniversary; fifty percent (50%) of this bonus will be paid back to Akcea Therapeutics should you
voluntarily leave between your 1st and 2nd anniversary. 
 You also have the opportunity to participate in our employee benefits program, outlined in the
provided benefits summary. Your vacation will begin accruing at the rate of 3 weeks per year based on your anniversary date. 
 In addition to the
foregoing, you are also entitled to the benefits set forth in the Severance and Equity Award Vesting Acceleration letter provided to you contemporaneous with this offer letter. 

This offer is contingent on you signing in the space provided below and signing the attached Employee Confidential Information, Inventions Assignment, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement. This offer is also contingent on a favorable background check. 

We are very pleased that you have decided to join us, and we look forward to working with you to continue to make Akcea a successful company! 

Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Damien McDevitt

	 Damien McDevitt

	 Chief Executive Officer


  

			
	Accepted and agreed:	 	 /s/ William T. Andrews

		
	Confirmed Start Date:	 	 Between July 9 – July 13, 2020