alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Oscar Alberto Sanabria ALVARADO; Martha Luz Moreira De Sanabria; Gerardo Alberto Sanabria Moreira; Leonardo Alberto Sanabria Moreira; Moreira Andrea Paola Sanabria, aka Andrea Paola Sanabria Moreira, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 11-70414.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*528Submitted April 10, 2014.*

Decided April 14, 2014.

Frank E. Ronzio, Ronzio & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Oil, Andrew Jacob Oliveira, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department Of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: THOMAS, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Alberto Sanabria Alvarado (“San-abria Alvarado”), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). His wife and three children are derivative beneficiaries of his application. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny his petition.

To be eligible for asylum, an applicant must demonstrate either that he has suffered persecution in the country of removal or that he has a well-founded fear of future persecution there. *See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). Substantial evidence in the record supports the IJ’s conclusion that the mistreatment Sanabria Alvarado claims to have suffered in El Salvador—consisting largely of unspecific threats—does not rise to the level of persecution. *See Lim v. INS,*224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir.2000). Nor has Sanabria Alvarado established a well-founded fear of future persecution. The past mistreatment was allegedly motivated by Sanabria Alvarado’s involvement in an engineering project. That project was canceled after Sanabria Alvarado’s departure from El Salvador, and he has presented no evidence that other project participants have been victimized in the years since the cancellation.

Because Sanabria Alvarado cannot meet his burden of proof for asylum, he necessarily fails to meet the higher burden of proof for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of relief under the CAT. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (requiring an applicant for CAT relief to establish that torture is more likely than not upon removal).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Expunction

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 021

- C V

Trial court case number: 16

- DCV

- 235247

Trial court: 2 6 8 th District Court of Fort Bend County

App e l l a nt

, L.M.R., proceeding pro se, h a s not p a id t h e filing f e e a nd h a s not m a de

a r ra n g e ments to p a y for the c l e rk ’ s r e c ord. On January 24 , 2017, th e Clerk of this Court had

notified appellant that the “ Affidavit of Indigence,” filed in this Court on January 10, 2017, did

not appear to comply with the new indigency rules

. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c) (amended ; eff.

Sept. 1, 2016) . The Clerk forwarded to appellant the approved “Statement of Inability to Afford

Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond” (“Statement”), which must be used or else an y

affidavit of indigence must include the same information as this Statement. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P.

145(b), (d ) (amended ; eff. Sept. 1, 2016)

. Because no clerk’s record has been filed yet in this Court, t his C ourt has d i s c o v e r e d

, from the district clerk’s website, that app e llant p r e v i o u s l y f iled a “Statement of Inability to

Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond in Justice Court

, ” which is a form approved

by the Texas Supreme Court, in the trial court on September 7

, 20 1 6. Rule 20.1 provid e s t h a t a

p a r t y who fil e s such a S tat e m e nt in the t r i a l cou r t will not h a ve to p a y c osts in t h e a p p e l l a te c ourt

unless the tri a l c ourt ov e rrul e d the p a r t y ’s c laim of ind i g e n c e in an order that complies with

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 14 5

. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P

. 20.1 ( b) ( 1). However, t he Court is

unable t o dete r m ine whe t her a contest w a s f iled or i f the trial court over r u l ed this claim of

indigence in such an order

. See id.

According l y

, th e Court ORDERS the d i s t r i c t clerk t o f ile a suppl e m ent a l clerk’s

reco r d c ontain i ng ap p ellant’s “Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an

Appeal Bond in Justice Court,” a n y c o ntests f iled, and a n y o r der s granti n g or overruling

appellant’s indigence claim. The supp le m ental clerk’s reco r d on indigence shall b e f iled in this

Court w ithin 20 da y s of the date of this o r der.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually

D ate: April 4, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,387,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,037,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                   425,852
<INVENTORY>                                  5,737,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,434,262
<PP&E>                                       6,701,319
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,482,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,498,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,164,231
<BONDS>                                        228,406
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,457,039
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,498,922
<SALES>                                      7,886,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,997,785
<CGS>                                        4,110,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,303,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                949,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                   379,731
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   569,596
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
# AMR - User Notes

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cvm-gfi-152-evaluating-safety-antimicrobial-new-animal-drugs-regard-their-microbiological-effects

# FY2023Q1

# FY2023Q2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>          
               THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
               FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS
               OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 1,2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
               FOR  THE  YEAR-TO-DATE,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
               REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                  166,550
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,055,114
<ALLOWANCES>                            (186,814)
<INVENTORY>                             3,045,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,231,049
<PP&E>                                  4,692,507
<DEPRECIATION>                          (2,614,975)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          7,455,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,173,663
<BONDS>                                 2,763,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                   55,406
<OTHER-SE>                              2,462,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            7,455,778
<SALES>                                 4,021,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        4,021,470
<CGS>                                   3,337,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,337,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        618,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (82,482)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         7,873
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     7,873
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            7,873
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .00
        

</TABLE>
$410,859,753.55
    
    March 31, 2008 (the Effective Date)
  Schedule 1 Borrower Borrowers TLC FCMC Bank Forbearance Agreement Existing Note
 Note
   PROMISE TO PAY
 Principal Sum




---



##### 



INTEREST
   MANNER OF PAYMENT; PRINCIPAL BALANCE
   SECURITY
  DEFAULT
  GENERAL PROVISIONS
  2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 4




---



##### 



BORROWERS:Each Borrower listed on Schedule 1 attached hereto:By:
    
    /s/ Alexander Gordon JardinName: Alexander Gordon JardinTitle:  Chief Executive Officer, as an authorized officer of,
and on behalf of, each such Borrower listed on Schedule 1
attached hereto
 THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE BORROWERS UNDER THIS SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED PROMISSORY NOTE ARE
GUARANTEED BY FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION PURSUANT TO A GUARANTY DATED DECEMBER 28, 2007
IN FAVOR OF THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK.
 REAFFIRMATION AND CONSENT OF GUARANTOR
 Bank
 FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Thomas J. Axon

 Thomas J. AxonTitle:
    
    President
 Signature Page to Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note (A Note)




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Tribeca Subsidiaries




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Tribeca Subsidiaries
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*JEFFREY RODRIGUEZ

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 250 (AC 30766), is denied.

*919
      *Gary A. Mastronardi,*in support of the petition.

*Sarah Hanna,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 24, 2010
#### Enriqueta Gomez CASTRO; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74274.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*609Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

Adrian H. Triminio, Esq., Fountain Valley, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Daniel E. Goldman, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of linmigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider as untimely. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2) (stating time limits for filing motions to reconsider); *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 895-96 (9th Cir.2003).

Accordingly, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[No. 58413-8-I.

Division One.

September 17, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Craig Stuart Burton, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-1-10870-0, Jay V. White, J., entered June 19, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>



THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE FOUR MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      554
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10893
<PP&E>                                            9013                                       
<DEPRECIATION>                                     139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8164
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            16
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                7
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<OTHER-SE>                                        7877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28777
<SALES>                                           2021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2021
<CGS>                                             2221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (951)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16                                      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Scott D. Kaplan, Chief Executive Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby
certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life
Insurance Company of New Jersey) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property
Partnership.

Date: May 14, 2010



/s/ Scott D.
KaplanScott D. KaplanChief Executive OfficerPruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


/s/ Neal Ludeke
------------------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
partner of the Registrant
November 14, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2622 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2622

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make certain drug offenses 
  under State law predicate offenses under the armed career criminal 
                                statute.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1993

 Mr. Moorhead introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make certain drug offenses 
  under State law predicate offenses under the armed career criminal 
                                statute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Armed Career Criminal Clarification 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN DRUG OFFENSES UNDER STATE LAW MADE PREDICATE OFFENSES 
              UNDER THE ARMED CAREER CRIMINAL STATUTE.

    Section 924(e)(2)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (ii), by adding ``or'' at the end; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(iii) an offense under State law which, if it had 
                been prosecuted as a violation of the Controlled 
                Substances Act at the time of the offense and because 
                of the type and quantity of the controlled substance 
                involved, would have been punishable by a maximum term 
                of imprisonment of ten years or more;''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.34

   

  FIRST LEASE AMENDMENT

   

  This Lease Amendment made this 29th day of October, 2019 by and between
    DUKE & DUKE, a Limited Partnership, of 37000 Grand River Avenue, Suite 360, Farmington Hills, MI 45335, as “LANDLORD” and Ocuphire Pharma, Inc. of 37000 Grand River Avenue, Suite 120, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, as “TENANT”.

   

  WITNESSETH

   

  WHEREAS, on or about the 19th day of May, 2019, Landlord and Tenant entered
    into a Lease Agreement. The Lease together with any and all Amendments and/or riders is herein collectively referred to as, “Lease”. The certain demised premises consists of 1,623 rentable square feet and being commonly known as Suite 120 at 37000
    Grand River Avenue, Farmington Hills, MI 48335; and

   

  WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend this Lease in respect to the demised premises in that Tenant wil1 extend the term of the original Lease Agreement; and

   

  NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of monies to be paid and covenants and conditions to be performed, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

   

  		1.	That the rent for the Suite known as Suite 120 will be as follows;


   

  01/01/2020 — 12/31/2020            $22.00 per rentable square foot

   

  		2.	That the expiration date of Tenant’s Lease shall be December 31, 2020.


   

  		3.	Tenant Share: 2.l3%


   

  		4.	Base Tax:        $1.39


   

  5.           Miscellaneous: The Lease remains in full force and effect and has not been modified or extended except as specifically set in this First
    Amendment and extension of lease agreement. To the extent of any conflict between this Amendment and extension of lease agreement and the lease, the provisions of this First Amendment shall control.

   

  	TENANT:	 	LANDLORD:
	 	 	 
	Ocuphire Pharma, Inc.	 	DUKE & DUKE
	
          

           

        	 	a Limited Partnership

        
	 	 	 
	/s/ Mina Sooch	 	/s/ Thomas A. Duke, Jr.
	Name: Mina Sooch	 	Thomas A. Duke, Jr.
	Its: CEO	 	Partner
	Dated: 11/6/19	 	Dated: 11/6/2019