alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                          Washington, D.C.  20549

                                   Form 8-K

                               CURRENT REPORT

      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                               Date of report:
                               January 24, 2001
                       Date of earliest event reported:
                               January 24, 2001




                                 PFIZER INC.
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     Delaware                    1-3619                13-5315170
    (State or other         (Commission File        (I.R.S. Employer
     jurisdiction of             Number)           Identification No.)
     incorporation)


                           235 East 42nd Street
                             New York, New York                 10017
                  (Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)


         Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
                             (212) 573-2323




       (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


Item 5.      Other Events.

Attached and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 99 is a copy of a
press release of Pfizer Inc. dated January 24, 2001, reporting Pfizer's
financial results for the fourth quarter of 2000 and for the year 2000.

Item 7(c).   Exhibits.
99  Press release of Pfizer Inc. dated January 24, 2001, reporting Pfizer's
financial results for the fourth quarter of 2000 and for the year 2000.



Signature
Under the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the authorized
undersigned.

                           PFIZER INC.
                           ----------------------------


Date  January 24, 2001
                                /s/ Margaret M. Foran
                           Name:  Margaret M. Foran
                           Title: Vice President-Corporate Governance
[Nos. 34332-1-II; 35299-1-II.

Division Two.

September 25, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Nicholas David Baxley, *Appellant.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 05-1-00162-2, George L. Wood, J., entered January 20, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Hunt and Quinn-Brintnall, JJ.
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       INTERNATIONAL SPORTS WAGERING INC.


         International Sports Wagering Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL),
hereby certifies that, in accordance with Section 242 of the DGCL, a resolution
setting forth the following amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation and,
at a meeting of stockholders of the Corporation, was approved by a majority of
the holders of the outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote
thereon.

         Article First of the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation is
hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         "FIRST: The name of the Corporation is:

                 Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc."


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be executed by Bernard Albanese, its President, this 28th day of
February 2001 .


                                          /s/ Bernard Albanese
                                          --------------------
                                          Bernard Albanese
                                          President
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

AUGUST 21, 2014 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD32990 

 Re: TIMOTHY JONES, 

 Movant-Appellant, 

 v. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent-Respondent.
Exhibit
    12.1

CERTIFICATION
      UNDER SECTION 906SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002

I, Todd Bruce, the President
      and Chief Executive Officer of Crystallex International Corporation (the registrant),
      certify that:


1.     Based
    on my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A  No. 2 for the year
    ended December 31, 2002 (Form 20-F), of the registrant fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934;

2.     Based
    on my knowledge, the information contained in Form 20-F fairly presents,
    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|Date: February 11,
        2005 |                                              
|------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                                | /s/ Todd
          Bruce                     
|                                |                                              
|                                | Todd
          Bruce                         
|                                | President and Chief
        Executive Officer
|                                |                                              
|                                |                                              

A signed original of
      this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crystallex
      International Corporation and will be retained by such corporation and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2815

AMENDMENTS
In the Senate of the United States,

June 16 (legislative day, June 7), 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2815) entitled ‘‘An Act to designate a portion of

the Farmington River in Connecticut as a component of the

National Wild and Scenic Rivers System’’ do pass with the

following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 4, strike out lines 4 to 23 and insert:

2 (6) the Colebrook Dam and Goodwin Dam hy3 droelectric projects are located outside the river seg4 ment designated by section 3, and based on the study

5 of the Farmington River pursuant to Public Law 99–

6 590, continuation of the existing operation of these

7 projects as presently configured, including associated

8 transmission lines and other existing project works, is

9 compatible with the designation made by section 3

10 and will not unreasonably diminish the scenic, rec11 reational, and fish and wildlife values of the segnment
2

HR 2815 EAS

1 designated by such section as of the date of enactment

2 of this Act.

3 Ω2æPage 6, strike out lines 2 to 4 and insert:

4 (a) COMMITTEE.—The Director of the National Park

5 Service, or his or her designee, shall represent the Secretary

6 on the Farmington River Coordinating Committee provided

7 for in the plan.

8 Ω3æPage 6, line 5, strike out all after ‘‘ROLE.—’’ down

9 to and including ‘‘(2)’’ in line 15 and insert: (1)

10 Ω4æPage 7, line 7, strike out ø(3)¿ and insert: (2)

11 Ω5æPage 7, line 10, strike out ø(4)¿ and insert: (3)

12 Ω6æPage 7, line 21, strike out øDirector¿ and insert:

13 Secretary

14 Ω7æPage 8, strike out lines 23 and 24.

15 Ω8æPage 9, line 1, strike out ø(3)¿ and insert: (2)

16 Ω9æPage 9, line 7, strike out ø(4)¿ and insert: (3)

Attest:

Secretary.
[No. 55951-6-I.

Division One.

August 13, 2007.]

#### *In the Matter of the Personal Restraint*of Jeffery Defores Collins, *Petitioner.*

Petition for relief from personal restraint. *Granted*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Appelwick, C.J., concurred in by Baker, J.; Coleman, J., concurring separately.
|  | 1. | The Company’s Form 10-K/A for the      fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   | /s/      Xiaoqun Ye                |
|--------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|  Date:      April 3, 2009 |   | Xiaoqun      Ye                    |
|                           |   | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                           |   | (Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                           |   |                               |
|                           |   | /s/      Yan Lin                   |
|  Date:      April 3, 2009 |   | Yan      Lin                       |
|                           |   | Chief      Accounting Officer      |
|                           |   | (Principal      Financial Officer) |

----
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-02903, No. 333-04712, No. 333-87124, No. 333-102109, No. 333-125291, No. 333-134031, No. 333-143285, No. 333-151290 and No. 333-159501 on Form S-8, of our
report dated March 16, 2009 relating to the financial statements of West Marine, Inc. for the years ended January 3, 2009 and December 29, 2007 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Marine, Inc. for the year ended January 2, 2010.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP               
|                                        
|San Francisco, California March 17, 2010
|    |            |
|----|------------|
| 1. | Severance. |

----

----

|                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |  |
| SPARTECH CORPORATIONBy:  President and Chief Executive Officer | EMPLOYEERandy C. MartinExecutive Vice President, CorporateDevelopment and Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2461 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 356

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2461

                          [Report No. 103-656]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 
 to authorize the transfer to States of surplus personal property for 
donation to nonprofit providers of necessaries to impoverished families 
                            and individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 3, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                 Union Calendar No. 356
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2461

                          [Report No. 103-656]

 To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 
 to authorize the transfer to States of surplus personal property for 
donation to nonprofit providers of necessaries to impoverished families 
                            and individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 1993

 Mr. Hamilton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

                             August 3, 1994

     Additional sponsors: Mr. McCloskey, Mr. Jacobs, and Mr. Coyne

                             August 3, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 
 to authorize the transfer to States of surplus personal property for 
donation to nonprofit providers of necessaries to impoverished families 
                            and individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR DONATION TO 
              PROVIDERS OF NECESSARIES TO IMPOVERISHED FAMILIES AND 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 203(j)(3)(B) of the Federal Property and Administrative 
Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 484(j)(3)(B)) is amended by inserting 
after ``homeless individuals'' the following: ``, providers of 
assistance to families or individuals whose annual incomes are below 
the poverty line (as that term is defined in section 673 of the 
Community Services Block Grant Act),''.
```
#### FRESENIUS USA, INC. and Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2007-1193.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Fresenius USA, Inc. et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2824

AN ACT

To modify the project for flood control, James

River Basin, Richmond, Virginia.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2824

AN ACT

To modify the project for flood control, James River Basin,

Richmond, Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JAMES RIVER BASIN, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA.

4 The project for flood control, James River Basin,

5 Richmond, Virginia, authorized by section 401(a) of the

6 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat.

7 4126) is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army

8 to construct the project at a total cost of $134,000,000,

9 with an estimated Federal cost of $100,500,000 and an

10 estimated non-Federal cost of $33,500,000.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         (2,057)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    490,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               566,871
<PP&E>                                         324,750
<DEPRECIATION>                                 228,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 677,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,897,460
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   677,252
<SALES>                                         85,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,000
<CGS>                                           46,157
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               416,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,969)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (373,505)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (373,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (373,505)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-7892.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 2010.

Decided Jan. 28, 2010.

Rodney Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 *619U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. *See United States v. Goines, 357*F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”); *United States v. Legree,*205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.2000). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated there. *See United States v. Wilson,*No. 4:03-cr-70134-nkm-mfu-3 (WD.Va. Sept. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2761

To transfer certain offices of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to the Department of the Interior, and to transfer coastal assessment, science, and management components of the National Ocean Service of that Administration to the Department of Environmental

Protection.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1993

Mrs. UNSOELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To transfer certain offices of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to the Department of the Interior, and to transfer coastal assessment, science, and

management components of the National Ocean Service

of that Administration to the Department of Environmental Protection.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ocean and Coastal

5 Management Improvement Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2761 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF OFFICES OF NATIONAL OCEANIC

2 AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION TO DE3 PARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.

4 (a) TRANSFER OF OFFICES.—There are transferred

5 to the Department of the Interior the following offices and

6 assets of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis7 tration:

8 (1) The National Ocean Service, other than the

9 components of that Service transferred under section

10 3.

11 (2) The National Marine Fisheries Service.

12 (3) The Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Re13 search.

14 (4) The fleet of research and survey vessels.

15 (5) The National Oceanic and Atmospheric

16 Corps.

17 (b) TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONS.—The functions that,

18 on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act,

19 were performed by an individual in their capacity as an

20 officer or employee of an office transferred by subsection

21 (a) are transferred to the Secretary of the Interior.

22 (c) DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS.—The Secretary of

23 the Interior shall delegate functions transferred by sub24 section (b) as follows:

25 (1) The functions relating to the national ma26 rine sanctuaries program performed by the National
3

•HR 2761 IH

1 Ocean Service shall be delegated to the Director of

2 the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

3 (2) The functions relating to mapping, chart4 ing, and geodesy performed by the National Ocean

5 Service shall be delegated to the Director of the Geo6 logical Survey.

7 (3) The functions performed by the National

8 Marine Fisheries Service shall be delegated to the

9 Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife

10 Service.

11 (4) To the Director of the Biological Survey,

12 the following functions:
#### Roosevelt BROOME, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael S. HUNTER; J.W. England; D. Steitz; K. Jones; H.A. Britton; A. Conner; K.F. Williams; K. Paige; Sharonview Federal Credit Union, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1712.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 7, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 27, 2011.

*667Roosevelt Broome, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Keith B. Nichols, Horack Talley Pharr & Lowndes, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Broome, Jr. appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district court’s order.

In Broome’s complaint, he alleged that a state court’s order in foreclosure proceedings on his residence violated his federal rights. The magistrate judge recommended granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Under the Federal Magistrates Act, the district court may designate the magistrate judge to conduct a hearing, make proposed findings of fact, and recommend a disposition on certain motions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). Once the magistrate judge files a report and recommendation, the parties have ten days to object to it. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (2006). A district court reviews “de novo ... those portions of the report ... to which objection is made.” *Id.*

Here, before the time had expired for Broome to object to the report, the district court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed the complaint, stating that, as the court lacked jurisdiction over the complaint, waiting for Broome to file objections to the report would serve no valid purpose. While we do not condone the district court’s failure to comply with the statute, we find that this error was harmless as the court’s conclusion that it lacked jurisdiction over Broome’s complaint was not in error. *See Johnson v. De Grandy,*512 U.S. 997, 1005-06, 114 S.Ct. 2647, 129 L.Ed.2d 775 (1994) *(Rooker/Feldman*abstention doctrine prevents party losing in state court from seeking appellate review of the state judgment in federal district court, based on party’s claim that the state judgment violated the party’s federal rights) (citing *D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 416, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923)).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*