alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as Seiverth v. Perrysburg, 2023-Ohio-2767.]

IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

{¶1} In this public-records case, Requester Jonathan Douglas Seiverth seeks 

certain records from Respondent City of Perrysburg. After mediation failed to successfully 

resolve all disputed issues between the parties, Respondent moved to dismiss 

Requester’s complaint for failure to state a claim. 

{¶2} Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(1), a Special Master has issued a Report and 

Recommendation (R&R). The Special Master recommends denying Respondent’s 

motion to dismiss. (R&R, 3-4). The Special Master further recommends:

- Respondent be ordered to produce to Requester unredacted copies of all

records that were redacted based on attorney-client privilege and/or R.C.

3707.17 [sic].

- Respondent be ordered to produce to Requester all records filed with the

court for in camera review.

- Requester recover his filing fee and the costs he incurred in connection

with this case.

(R&R, 11.)

{¶3} Neither party has filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, 

as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party 

timely objects, then this Court “shall promptly issue a final order adopting the report and 

recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident 

on the face of the report and recommendation.” Upon independent review, the Court finds 

JONATHAN DOUGLAS SEIVERTH

 Requester

 v. 

CITY OF PERRYSBURG

 Respondent

Case No. 2022-00850PQ

Judge Lisa L. Sadler

JUDGMENT ENTRY
Case No. 2022-00850PQ -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY

typographical errors referencing R.C. 3707.17, instead of R.C. 3701.17, in the Report and 

Recommendation. See R&R at 1, 11. The Court further finds, however, that the Special 

Master has correctly applied R.C. 3701.17. The Court also finds no error of law or other 

defect evident on the face of the Report and Recommendation. The Court adopts the 

Report and Recommendation, excepting the typographical errors. 

{¶4} In accordance with the Special Master’s recommendations, the Court

DENIES Respondent City of Perrysburg’s 12(B)(6) Motion To Dismiss Requester’s 

Complaint (filed on June 14, 2023); the Court ORDERS Respondent to produce to 

Requester unredacted copies of all records that were redacted based on attorney-client 

privilege or R.C. 3701.17, or both, and all records filed with the Court for in camera review; 

and the Court ORDERS that Requester is entitled to recover from Respondent the

amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the

action that are incurred by Requester, excepting attorney fees. Court costs are assessed

to Respondent. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date

of entry upon the journal.

LISA L. SADLER

Judge

Filed July 18, 2023

Sent to S.C. Reporter 8/10/23
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1779 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1779

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Missouri, as the ``Jerry 
            L. Litton United States Post Office Building''.
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1779

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Missouri, as the ``Jerry 
            L. Litton United States Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 
South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Missouri, is designated as the 
``Jerry L. Litton United States Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map, or other 
paper of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 is 
deemed to be a reference to the ``Jerry L. Litton United States Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1993.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-3159-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-3159-EM), dated December 28, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

February 12, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective January 8, 2001.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-4602 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President  FinanceandChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose TREVINO-DAVILA, also known as Jose Davila Trevino, also known as Jose Trevino, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-20324

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Trevino-Davila raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for *379summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-72086, No. 33-86040, No. 333-05643 and No. 333-56215 of The Talbots, Inc. and
its subsidiaries on Forms S-8 of our reports dated March 17, 1999, appearing in
and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Talbots,
Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year ended January 30, 1999.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP
April 29, 1999
Boston, Massachusetts
Schedule
      10.16

    Purchasers

    


    


    1. PFK
      Acquisition Group, LLC executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant
      Purchase Agreement as of February 21, 2006. 

    


    2. Alfred
      F.
      Bracher, III executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of February 14, 2006. 

    


    3. Howard
      Goldberg executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 13, 2006. 

    


    4. Real
      Path, Inc. executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of February 14, 2006. 

    


    5. Robert
      Schachter Trust, Diane Schachter, Trustee executed the Senior Secured
      Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement as of February 7, 2006.


    


    6. Harvey
      Goldberg executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 24, 2006. 

    


    7. Larry
      Chimerine executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant Purchase
      Agreement as of March 21, 2006. 

    


    8. Nob
      Hill
      Capital Partners, LP executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant
      Purchase Agreement as of February 13, 2006.

    


    9. Nob
      Hill
      Capital Associates, LP executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and Warrant
      as of July 30, 2006.

    


    10. Nicolette
      Consulting Group Limited executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and
      Warrant as of August 10, 2006.

    


    11. PFK
      Acquisition Group II, LLC executed the Senior Secured Convertible Note and
      Warrant Purchase Agreement as of June 28, 2006.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
general partner of the Registrant
August 13, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Navarre
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2005 (the "Annual
Report"), I, Eric H. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         2.       The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


June 14, 2005
                                      By /s/ James Gilbertson
                                         ----------------------------------
                                             James Gilbertson
                                             Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies
International, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Durland, Acting Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



                                               /s/ Stephen Durland
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Stephen Durland
                                               Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                               November 13, 2002
May 9, 1997

        Avondale Industries, Inc.
        Post Office Box 50280
        New Orleans, Louisiana  70150

        We have made a review, in accordance  with  standards  established by
        the  American  Institute  of  Certified  Public Accountants,  of  the
        unaudited interim financial information of  Avondale Industries, Inc.
        and subsidiaries for the periods ended March  31,  1997  and 1996, as
        indicated  in  our  report  dated  May  2,  1997; because we did  not
        perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

        We are aware that our report referred to  above, which is included in
        your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March 31,
        1997  is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No.  33-
        31984 on Forms S-8 and S-3.

        We also  are  aware  that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule
        436 under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the
        Registration Statement  prepared  or  certified by an accountant or a
        report prepared or certified by an accountant  within  the meaning of
        Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



        DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
        New Orleans, Louisiana
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

_____________________ ______ No. 02

- 22

- 00119

- C R N o. 02

- 22

- 00120

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 16th District Court Denton County, Texas Tr ial Court No s . F

- 2007

- 1147

- A, F

- 2007

- 1148

- A Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. M emorandum Opinion b y Justice Womack 

### D WIGHT 

### W

AYNE 

### R OGERS 

### J R 

### . , Appellant
V 

### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORAND UM OP INI ON In these two appeals, Appellant Dwight Wayne Rogers Jr. attempts to appeal from the trial court ’ s order denying hi s moti on for release of records. Rogers did not file that motion until well a fter he was convicted of f our c ounts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and our cou rt affirmed his conviction s . See Rogers v. State , Nos. 2

- 08

- 479

- CR, 2

- 08

- 480

- CR , 2010 WL 199907 3 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth May 20, 2010, pet . ref

’ d ) (per curiam) (m em. op., not designated for publ ication ) ( affirming Rogers ’ s conviction s ). In the c riminal conte xt, our jurisdiction is ge nerally limited to cases in which the trial court has si gned a judgment of conviction. McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App
. — Fort Wor th 1996, no pet.)
. We do n ot have jurisdiction to review a trial court ’ s or ders unless that ju risdiction has been expressly granted by statute. Ragston v. S t

ate , 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The order from which Rogers attempts to appeal is not a final judgm ent o f conviction nor is it a nonfinal order that has been made appealable by statute. See Petite v. State , No. 02

- 20

- 00030

- CR, 2020 WL 1057318, at * 1 (Tex . App.

— Fort Worth Mar. 5, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for p ublication) ( holding that t rial court ’ s denial of motion for discovery that was filed “ well after [appellant] was convicted of murder in the underlying case ” was “ not a final jud gment of conviction, nor [was] it a nonfinal order that ha [d] been made appeal able by statute ” )
.3

We no tif ied R o gers of our jurisdictional concern an d stated that we would dismiss these appeals fo r want of j urisdiction unless we received a response showing ground s for continuing them
. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2 (f), 44. 3. Although Rogers filed a response, it does not show grounds fo r con t inuing the se appeal s . Accordingly, we d ismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161. /s/ Dana Womack Dana Womack Justice Do N ot Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) Delivered : August 1 1, 2022
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7378

WALTER D. BOOKER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SGT. T. JOHNSON; TEC. E. STOVALL; OFC. JOHN DOE; TEC. R. 

BAGNELL,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

DET. M. LUCK; DET. T. KEOUGH,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00833-JCC-TCB)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Walter D. Booker, Appellant Pro Se. James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS, 

RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Walter D. Booker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Johnson, 

No. 1:14-cv-00833-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. June 25, 2015; Sept. 8, 2017). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                            |                                                                                                                                   |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

|                            |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |                                                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/            Steven E. Brown |
|   | Steven E. Brown                                                                            |
|   | Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer                                         |
|   | November 12, 2010                                                                     |
Photograph 1: 

Red arrow – cecum Yellow arrow – ileum 

Photograph 1 shows the basic anatomical features to help determine the location of the most 

distal point (point located the farthest from the Rumen) of the distal ileum portion of the 

smallintestine. This photograph identifies the cecum (a blind ending pouch which opens into 

the intestinal tract at the junction of the small and large intestine), and the ileum (distal 

portion of the small intestine) as it attaches to the cecum. The ileocecal junction is exposed 

by manipulation of the large intestine (FSIS program employees is lifting the large intestine), 

which allows it to be more easily recognizable. The distal portion of the ileum (point of 

attachment of the small intestine to the cecum directed proximally 80 inches towards the 

rumen) is considered to be specified risk material.