alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.01





Certification





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the “Form
      10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      February 19, 2008





By:
            /s/
                Bernard AlbaneseBernard
                AlbaneseChairman
                of the Board and
              Chief
                Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer


The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code).
# FY19_Q2

# Percent Positives - User Notes
EX-35.2
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES
A Lehman Brothers Company

Depositor: Structured Asset Securities Corporation
           745 Seventh Avenue 8th Floor
           New York, NY 10019

Trustee:   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
           9062 Old Annapolis Road
           Columbia, MD 21045

Securities Administrator:

Subject:        Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:    2007
Securitization: SARM 2007-3

I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora
Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the
Calendar Year 2007:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period
beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the "reporting
period") and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been
made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects
throughout such reporting period.

Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC



By: /s/ E. Todd Whittemore

Name: E. Todd Whittemore
Title: Executive Vice President



(logo) EQUAL HOUSING
LENDER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime CONTRERAS-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41073

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Government has filed an unopposed motion to summarily affirm Jaime Contreras-Vasquez’s conviction and summarily vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing in light of *Lopez v. Gonzales,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), and *United States v. Estrada-Mendoza,*475 F.3d 258 (5th Cir.2007). The motion is GRANTED, the conviction is AFFIRMED, the sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 2294

CHUKWUEMEKA SAMUEL UKAONU

,

Petitioner

,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chukwuemeka Samuel Ukaonu , Petitioner Pro Se

. Deitz P. Lefort

, Erik Robert Quick, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Chukwuemeka Samuel Ukaonu, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the

immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal. 1 We

have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Ukaonu’s merits hearing

and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a

ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)

(2012), and that substantia l evidence supports the adverse credibility determination

. See

Tewabe v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 533, 538 (4th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Ukaonu (B.I.A. Oct. 6, 2017).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

1 Ukaonu does not challenge the denial of his request for protection under the Convention Against Torture . He has therefore waived appellate review of this claim. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004).
Exhibit 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE  GUESS?, INC.  1996 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, Guess?, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Guess?, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (the
"Plan");

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company may amend the Plan
at any time, subject to certain limitations;

WHEREAS, the Plan does not clearly address the issuance of shares in book entry form or other uncertificated means and the rights, if any,
the holders of such shares may have under the Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to permit the issuance of shares in book entry form and clarify the rights, if any, the
holders of such shares have under the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of December 17, 2007, as follows:

SECTION 8

STOCK OPTIONS



SECTION 9

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS





SECTION 10

PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARDS





---



SECTION 12

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS





SECTION 18

MISCELLANEOUS



[Remainder
of page intentionally left blank]

2

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this amendment.

| | GUESS?, INC.                                                       
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/CARLOS ALBERININame: Carlos Alberini
Title: President and C.O.O.

3

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Novastar Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Rodney E. Schwatken, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: July 10, 2009 | /s/ Rodney E. Schwatken      
|------------------- | -----------------------------
|                    | Rodney E.
      Schwatken    
|                    | Chief Financial
      Officer

This certification is made solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained
therein, and not for any other purpose.

---
J

- S55003

- 18

NON
- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION
- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

J.M.S.

- M.
Appellant

v.

D.L.M., III : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 620 EDA 2018 Appeal from the Order January 23, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Civil Division at No(s): No. OC1200429

BEFORE: OLSON, J., STABILE, J., and FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY OLSON, J.: FILED NOVEMBER 08, 2018
Appellant, J.M.S.

- M (“Mother”) appeals from the January 23, 2018 order
transferring this action from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County. We affirm.
Prior to addressing the issues Mother rais es on appeal, we must first
determine whether she has preserved those issues for our review. See Cook

v. Cook , 186 A.3d 1015, 1026

- 1027 (Pa. Super. 2018)

. “Our law is
unequivocal that the responsibility rests upon the appellant to ensure that the

record certified on appeal is complete in the sense that it contains all of the
materials necessary for the review ing court to perform its duty.” Ignelzi v.
Ogg, Cordes, Murphy & Ignelzi, LLP , 160 A.3d 805, 808 (Pa. Super. 2017),
appeal denied , 174 A.3d 1030 (Pa . 2017) (citation omitted). The failure of an
appellant to comply with Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1921 byJ

- S55003

- 18

- 2

-

ensuring all necessary documents are included in the certified record results
in the appellant waiving his or her challenge s to the tri al court’s order.

Kessler v. Broder , 851 A.2d 944, 950 (Pa. Super

. 2004) , appeal denied , 868
A.2d 1201 (Pa. 2005) (citation omitted).
The certified record is devoid of any factual details regarding this case.

There is no complaint seeking custody. There is no custody order. The first
document that appears in the certified record is a petition to transfer
jurisdiction. However, without the custody complai nt and custody order, it is

im possible to determine what jurisdiction Mother sought to have tra nsferred
or whether the trial court’s action in relation to the petition was correct. As

Mother’s failure to ensure that a complete certified record was transmitted to

this Court has hampered our review of this case, we conclude that Mother

waived all of her appellate issues and we affirm the trial court’s order. 1

Order affirmed.

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

1 We may not sua sponte raise the issue of standing under Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 501. In re Duran , 769 A.2d 497, 501 n.2 (Pa. Super. 2001). Nevertheless, we note that had D.L.M., II I raised the issue before this Court, we would have held that Mother was not an aggrieved party under Rule 501 and would have dismissed the appeal on that basis. Mother wanted the custody case to be handled in Delaware County. She got what she wanted.J

- S55003

- 18

- 3

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 11/8/18
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 17, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40933 Summary Calendar

GERALD C. PIPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHRISTINA M. CRAIN, Chairman, TX Board of Criminal Justice; DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director; RICK THALER, Regional Director; DAVID SWEETIN, Senior Warden; PHILLIP JEFFERIES, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:06-CV-61

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gerald C. Piper, Texas prisoner # 913394, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. A dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted is reviewed de novo. Black v. Warren , 134 F.3d 732, 734 (5th Cir. 1998). Piper alleges that conditions in the Eastham Unit are interrupting his sleep. “[T]he treatment a prisoner receives inNo. 06-40933 -2- prison and the conditions under which he is confined are subject to scrutiny under the Eighth Amendment.” Woods v. Edwards , 51 F.3d 577, 581 (5th Cir. 1995) (internal quotations and citation omitted). To establish an Eighth Amendment violation, the prisoner must show that “the risk that [he] complains of [is] so grave that it violates contemporary standards of decency to
expose anyone unwillingly to such a risk.” Helling v. McKinney , 509 U.S. 25, 36 (1993). Piper has made no showing that the complained conditions violate contemporary standards of decency. The district court did not err in finding that Pipers’s claims were insufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation. Piper is warned that the district court’s dismissal of his § 1983 suit counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996); § 1915(g).
AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
**Exhibit21.01**

**Laureate Education, Inc. Subsidiary List**

Laureate Education, Inc. (Maryland)

Post-Secondary Education Acquisition Corp. (Delaware)

The Canter Group of Companies (California)

Canter and Associates, Inc. (Delaware)

Walden e-Learning, Inc. (Delaware)

Walden University, Inc. (Florida)

Laureate Education International, Ltd. (Delaware)

Fleet Street International University Holdings LLC (Maryland)

Fleet Street International Universities CV(Netherlands)

Gesthotel SA (Switzerland)

Glion Group SA (Switzerland)

Ecole Superior du Commerce Exterieur (France)

Desarrollo del Conocimiento, SA (Chile)

Universidad de Las Americas (Chile)

CAMPVS Mater, SA (Chile)

Desarrollo de la Educacion Superior SA (Chile)

Corporacion Universidad Nacional Andres Bello (Chile)

Instituto Professional AIEP SA (Chile)

Centro de Formacion Tecnica Instituto AIEP SA (Chile)

Centro de Formacion Tecnica Instituto AIEP Regional SA (Chile)

Universidad de Las Americas — Ecuador (Ecuador)

Universidad del Valle de Mexico, A.C. (Mexico)

Grupo Educativo Potosino AC (Mexico)

Estrategia Educativa y Cultural de Tabasco, SC (Mexico)

Grupo Educativo del Sureste AC (Mexico)

Administradora del Valle del Centro (Mexico)

Administradora del Valle de Texoco (Mexico)

Administradora del Valle de Toluca (Mexico)

Grupo Educativo del Bajio, SC (Mexico)

Formacion Completa, SC (Mexico)

Hispanoamericana de Estudios Superiores SC (Mexico)

Universidad Pro Desarrollo Mexico, SC (Mexico)

ISCP-Sociedade Educacional SA (Brazil)

Iniciativas Culturales de Espana, SL (Spain)

Laureate I BV (Netherlands)

Laureate International BV (Netherlands)

Laureate OnLine Education BV (Netherlands)

IEDE Institute for Executive Development SL(Spain)

Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas SAC(Peru)

Laureate International Costa Rica, Srl (CostaRica)

Universidad Interamericana de Panama, SA(Panama)

Universidad Latinoamericana de Ciencia yTechnologia (Panama)

Institut Francais de Gestion SAS (France)

Ecole Centrale des Techniques de l’EnvironementIndustriel SA (France)

Universidad Technologica Centroamericana(Honduras)

A.S. Cyprus College Ltd. (Cyprus)

Wall Street International Holdings US I, Inc.(Maryland)

Escuela Superior de Alta Gestion de Hotel, SL(Spain)

Universidad Europea de Madrid, SL (Spain)

Fleet Street Investments Sarl (Luxembourg)

Hedleton BV (Netherlands)

Inversiones en Educacion Limitada (Chile)

Indae Ltda. (Chile)

San Genaro, SA (Chile)

Ice Inversiones Brazil, SL (Spain)

Prepatech Sarl (France)

AGECE Association Loi de 1901 (France)

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11573-11574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4578]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-33-000]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Filing

February 20, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 2, 2001, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission) an Emergency Motion for Cease and Desist Order.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before March 2, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the

[[Page 11574]]

Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4578 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,080
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,077
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     48,437
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          50,131
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            50,667
<LOANS>                                        227,948
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,442
<DEPOSITS>                                     282,664
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,198
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,954
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 346,442
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,813
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,405
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,218
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,959
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,259
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      107
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,662
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,184
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,184
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.52
<LOANS-NON>                                        666
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   977
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (21)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,063
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,063
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Peanut Rates for the 2019 Crop Year 

The following are the applicable peanut rates for the 2019 crop year. 

Seg. 1 Peanuts

Peanut Type National Loan Rate 

Per Ton

Rate Per Percent Total 

Sound Mature Kernels 

(SMK)

Virginia $355.49 $4.839

Runner $355.16 $4.744

Spanish – SW $344.74 $4.720

Spanish – SE $344.74 $4.720

Valencia $355.49 $5.261
Shane Lokken, Owner

Northern MN Meat Co., Est. M1083

Notice of Suspension Held in Abeyance

March 4, 2024

Page 3 of 3