alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2460

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide cost share assistance

to construct reservoir structures for the storage of water in rural areas,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1993

Mr. EVERETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide cost

share assistance to construct reservoir structures for the

storage of water in rural areas, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RURAL WATER

4 SUPPLY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Watershed Protection and

6 Flood Prevention Act is amended by inserting after section

7 3A (16 U.S.C. 1003a) the following new section:
2

HR 2460 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 3B. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RURAL WATER

2 SUPPLY.

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the

4 Secretary shall provide at least 50 percent of the cost of

5 constructing reservoir structures for the storage of water

6 and main water transmission lines, to increase the water

7 supply in a rural area. Such rural water supply will not

8 exceed 50 percent of total project costs.

9 ‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—In order to qualify for assistance

10 under this section, a project must be designed to increase

11 the supply of water in a rural area that is experiencing

12 a severe problem with the quality or quantity of water.

13 ‘‘(c) RURAL AREA DEFINED.—As used in this sec14 tion, the term ‘rural area’ means any area that is not with15 in the outer boundary of any city having a population of

16 55,000 or more, according to the most recent decennial

17 census of the United States.’’.

18 (b) DEFINITION OF WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT.—Sec19 tion 2 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 1002) is amended by strik20 ing ‘‘Each project must contain’’ and all that follows

21 through ‘‘benefits of the project.’’.

Æ
# Percent Positive - User Note

# FY2023Q1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12566-12567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4721]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-030)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Astronomical Search for Origins and Planetary Systems 
(ORIGINS); Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space 
Science Advisory Committee, Astronomical Search for Origins Planetary 
Systems Subcommittee.

DATES: Tuesday, March 6, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Wednesday, March 7, 
2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: March 6, the subcommittee will meet at Jet Propulsion 
Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, room 180-703C. 
March 7, the subcommittee will meet at Carnegie Observatories, 813 
Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, California 91101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Anne L. Kinney, Code S, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
2150.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--Space Interferometry Mission Replan and Science
--Eclipse Science Potential
--Next Generation Space Telescope Rescope Status and Plans
--Origins Re-architecture Plans
--Origins Architecture

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.


[[Page 12567]]


    Dated: February 22, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-4721 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, James M. Williams,certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Monterey Gourmet FoodsInc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

I Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:                                  | March 25, 2005 |   |
|----------------------------------------|----------------|--------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ JAMES M. WILLIAMS                  |           |
| James M. Williams                      |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                   |
|                                        |                |        |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of Richman TaxCredit
      Properties Inc., general partner ofRichman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., generalpartner
      of the RegistrantFebruary
      8, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-334; MM Docket No. 00-210; RM-9979]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Sonoita, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a petition filed on behalf of Santa 
Cruz Broadcasting proposing the allotment of FM Channel 263A to 
Sonoita, Arizona, as that locality's first local aural transmission 
service. Petitioner withdrew its interest in pursuing the proposal. See 
65 FR 67690, November 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-210, adopted January 31, 2001, and 
released February 9, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-4729 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
[No. 34943-4-II.

Division Two.

August 14, 2007.]

#### Cowlitz County, *Respondent,*v. L. Carlyle Martin et al., *Appellants.*

The opinion in the above captioned case, which appeared in the advance sheets at 140 Wn. App. 170-81, has not been published in this permanent bound volume pursuant to an order of the Court of Apeáis dated January 29, 2008 granting reconsideration, withdrawing the opinion, and substituting a new opinion. See 142 Wn. App. 860.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
------------------------------------
by: Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
general partner of the Company
February 13, 2003
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2775

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restore the nonservice-connected

burial benefit entitlement to survivors of certain wartime veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY (by request) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restore the

nonservice-connected burial benefit entitlement to survivors of certain wartime veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 2302(a)(2) of title 38, United States

4 Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘whose body’’ and all

5 that follows through ‘‘expenses,’’.

6 (b) Section 2303(b)(2) of title 38, United States

7 Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘(other than a veteran

8 whose eligibility for benefits under this subsection is based

9 on being a veteran of any war)’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         113,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,784,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                   632,281
<INVENTORY>                                  6,662,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,502,008
<PP&E>                                      11,047,557
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,956,855)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,439,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,327,761
<BONDS>                                      5,307,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,178
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,439,893
<SALES>                                      3,456,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,845,165
<CGS>                                        1,808,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,141,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (382,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   145,408
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (237,244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 13, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-31116

Summary Calendar

MARK ANTHONY VINZANT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN KENNDY, Orleans Parish Prison; CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.,

Sheriff; MARCUS DILEO, Dr.,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CV-761

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Anthony Vinzant, federal prisoner # 27944-034, appeals

from the district court’s October 7, 2005, order denying his FED.

R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion, seeking relief from the district 

court’s dismissal of his action for failure to prosecute. See

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). Vinzant argues that the district court

abused its discretion in denying his Rule 60(b) motion because

the record does not support a finding of a clear record of delay
No. 05-31116

-2-

or contumacious conduct but rather suggests mere negligence and

reflects that he diligently pursued his claims. 

This court reviews the district court’s denial of a Rule

60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. Warfield v. Byron,

436 F.3d 551, 555 (5th Cir. 2006). Under this standard, “[i]t

is not enough that the granting of relief might have been

permissible, or even warranted--denial must have been so

unwarranted as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” Seven

Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1981). 

Vinzant has not shown “‘unusual or unique circumstances

justifying such relief.’” Aucoin v. K-Mart Apparel Fashion

Corp., 943 F.2d 6, 8 (5th Cir. 1991) (quoting Pryor v. U.S.

Postal Service, 769 F.2d 281, 286 (5th Cir. 1985)). Therefore,

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Vinzant’s motion

for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Vinzant also has filed

a motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief. Because

the proposed reply brief is devoted to arguing the merits of his

civil rights claims, an issue not relevant to the issue of the

district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, Vinzant’s

motion for an extension of time to file it also is DENIED.
AGREEMENT FOR HANDLING AND STORAGE SERVICES

This is an agreement for handling & storage services between CS 
Integrated LLC (CSI) and Monterey Pasta Co. (MPC) 

The term of this agreement shall be for three (3) years commencing on 
March 1, 1999 and expiring at midnight on February 28, 2002.  This 
agreement may be extended for additional one-year periods unless either 
party to the agreement provides written notice to the other at least 90 
days prior to their intention of terminating the agreement. 

For the term of the agreement and any extensions thereof, CSI shall 
provide handling service for food products placed in storage facilities 
on the CSI premises.  CSI shall provide sufficient skilled warehouse 
labor and necessary equipment to receive food products to be placed in 
storage by MPC, and deliver to trucks, rails cars or other carriers 
designed by MPC.  As consideration for such services, MPC agrees to pay 
CSI $.30 per case received. 

Additionally, CSI shall provide sufficient refrigerated storage space 
for the product provided by MPC. Temperature in said storage space shall 
be maintained at an average temperature of 29 degrees F.  As 
consideration for such services, MPC agrees to pay CSI $.12 per case 
received and $.12 per case per month for each successive month product 
remains in storage. 

MPC agrees that receipts and deliveries of its product shall be 
scheduled within the normal operating hours of CSI -   8:00 AM to 5:00 
PM, Monday through Friday.  MPC further agrees that invoices for 
services will be paid within 30 days from the date of invoice, and 
services outside the scope of the services described shall be billed at 
a rate mutually agreed upon by CSI and MPC.   Due to expected changes in 
parameters of the required services and conditions, CSI and MPC agree to 
examine at the anniversary date of each year of the agreement, the costs 
and rates charged and adjust rates according to mutual agreement. 

Due to the space and capital expenditure commitments made by CSI to 
accommodate the requirements of MPC, MPC agrees to a minimum annual 
throughput of 400,000 cases.  If in any year of the agreement or 
subsequent extension, annual cases received by CSI amounts to less than 
400,000, CSI will bill MPC for the difference between 400,000 and actual 
cases received at $.42 per case.  In the event of sale of either MPC or 
CSI, either party may terminate the agreement upon 90 day advance notice 
to the other without penalty or responsibility for minimum volumes.  
Additionally, MPC may terminate the agreement at any time, without 
penalty, if there is a serious breach of services by, and communicated 
to CSI and not remedied. 

        /s/ PAT ZIMMERMAN
Signed:         __________________________________              Date:       
                                                              02/05/99
        Pat Zimmerman                   
        CS Integrated, LLC

        /s/ STEPHEN L. BRINKMAN 
Signed:         __________________________________              Date:       
                                                              02/18/99
        Monterey Pasta Company
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6313

RONALD MCCLARY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MITCHELL LAWSON, Nurse Supervisor; JOSEPH LIGHTSEY; NURSE HENDERSON; NURSE SIERRA , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:14

- ct

- 03147

- FL )

Submitted : June 28, 2017 Decided: June 30, 2017

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ronald McClary , Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General , Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan Douglas Childs , Elizabeth Pharr McCullough , YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA , Ral eigh, North Carolina; Charles Houston Foppiano , Gary Adam Moyers , BATTEN LEE, PLLC , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronald McClary appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing McClary’s civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Lawson , No. 5:14

- ct

- 03147

- FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED