alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12795-12796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6941-6]


Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of 
North Carolina

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of North Carolina is 
revising its approved Public Water System Supervision Program. North 
Carolina has adopted drinking water regulations requiring consumer 
confidence reports from all community water systems. EPA has determined 
that this revision is no less stringent than the corresponding federal 
regulations. Therefore, EPA has tentatively decided to approve this 
State program revision.

DATES: All interested parties may request a public hearing. A request 
for a public hearing must be submitted by March 30, 2001 to the 
Regional Administrator at the address shown below. Frivolous or 
insubstantial requests for a hearing may be denied by the Regional 
Administrator. However, if a substantial request for a public hearing 
is made by March 30, 2001, a public hearing will be held. If no timely 
and appropriate request for a hearing is received and the Regional 
Administrator does not elect to hold a hearing on his own motion, this 
determination shall become final and effective on March 30, 2001. Any 
request for a public hearing shall include the following information: 
(1) The name, address, and telephone number of the individual 
organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; (2) A brief 
statement of the requesting person's interest in the Regional 
Administrator's determination and a

[[Page 12796]]

brief statement of the information that the requesting person intends 
to submit at such hearing; (3) The signature of the individual making 
the request, or, if the request is made on behalf of an organization or 
other entity, the signature of a responsible official of the 
organization or other entity.

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to this determination are available 
for inspection between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, at the following offices: North Carolina Department of 
Environment and Natural Resources, Public Water Supply Section, Parker-
Lincoln Building, 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 
27604. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Drinking Water 
Section, 61 Forsyth Street Southwest, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Froneberger, EPA Region 4, 
Drinking Water Section at the Atlanta address given above (telephone 
404-562-9446).

    Authority: (Section 1413 and section 1414 of the Safe Drinking 
Water Act, as amended (1996), and 40 CFR part 142).

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 4.
[FR Doc. 01-4873 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Laureate Education, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2016
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of Laureate Education, Inc. does hereby certify, to the best of such
officer's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 29, 2017



/s/ DOUGLAS L. BECKER Douglas L. Becker Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ EILIF SERCK-HANSSEN Eilif Serck-Hanssen President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer


The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report as
a separate disclosure document of Laureate Education, Inc. or the certifying officers.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Laureate Education, Inc. and will be retained by Laureate
Education, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
SCHEDULE P Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Changes of Interests

(Form 8865) in a Foreign Partnership

OMB No. 1545-1668

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  Attach To Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

Name of person filing Form 8865 Filer’s identifying number

Acquisitions

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25943Q Schedule P (Form 8865) 2004

Part I

Part II

(under section 6046A)

(e)

% of interest

before acquisition

(b)

Date of acquisition

(a)

Name, address, and identifying number of

person from whom your interest was acquired

Dispositions

Part III Change in Proportional Interest

Part IV

(c)

FMV of

interest acquired

(d)

Basis in

interest acquired

(f)

% of interest

after acquisition

(a)

Description of change

Name of foreign partnership

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions)

(e)

% of interest

before disposition

(b)

Date of disposition

(c)

FMV of

interest disposed

(d)

Basis in

interest disposed

(f)

% of interest

after disposition

(a)

Name, address, and identifying number of

person who acquired your interest

(e)

% of interest

before change

(b)

Date of change

(c)

FMV of

interest

(d)

Basis in

interest

(f)

% of interest

after change

2004
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-72086, 33-86040,333-05643, 333-56215, 333-42708, 333-101037, 333-107317, 333-119262 and 333-145156 on Forms S-8 ofour reports dated April 16, 2008, relating to the financial statements of The Talbots, Inc. andsubsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) InterpretationNo. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (R),*Share-Based Payment)*and theeffectiveness of The Talbots, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of The Talbots, Inc. for the year ended February 2, 2008./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPBoston, Massachusetts
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20141 Conference Calendar

__________________ WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEP'T OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIV.; TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-5741

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * William Robert Parker appeals the dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights complaint. He does not challenge the district court's imposition of sanctions. Therefore, that issue is deemed abandoned on appeal. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994). For essentially the same reasons on which the district court relied, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretionNo. 96-20141 -2- in dismissing Parker's complaint as frivolous. See Parker v. Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice - Institutional Div. , No. H-95- 5741 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 30, 1996). This appeal is frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This opinion does not lessen the warning of sanction given to Parker on this day in Parker v. Highland Ins. , No. 96-20118. We again caution Parker as to the consequences if he continues to waste judicial resources by bringing frivolous appeals. APPEAL DISMISSED. ADMONITION ISSUED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
J. Ablove, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Philip J. Ablove

Philip J. Ablove
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2752 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2752

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit the transportation of 
solid waste from the State in which the waste was generated to another 
State for purposes of treatment, storage, or disposal, unless the State 
   in which the waste was generated has in effect a law prohibiting 
                   nonreturnable beverage containers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1993

Mr. Carr of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit the transportation of 
solid waste from the State in which the waste was generated to another 
State for purposes of treatment, storage, or disposal, unless the State 
   in which the waste was generated has in effect a law prohibiting 
                   nonreturnable beverage containers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interstate Recycling Promotion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SHIPPING WASTE OUTSIDE STATES WITHOUT BOTTLE 
              BILLS.

    (a) Prohibition.--(1) Subtitle D of the Solid Waste Disposal Act 
(42 U.S.C. 6941 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new section:

``SEC. 0411. PROHIBITION ON SHIPMENT OF WASTE OUTSIDE CERTAIN STATES.

    ``It shall be lawful for any State to exclude from treatment, 
storage or disposal within its boundaries any quantity of solid waste 
from any other State which does not have, at a minimum, a substantially 
equivalent State law promoting or requiring the recycling of any 
portion of the solid waste products involved. Such laws shall include 
but not be limited to a law prohibiting the manufacture, sale or 
introduction into commerce of any nonreturnable beverage container with 
respect to which no reasonable refundable money deposit is required by 
consumer.''.
    (2) The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting the 
following after the item relating to section 4010:

``Sec. 4011. Regulation on shipment of waste between certain States''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 4011 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 
as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on January 1, 1994.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4778]



[[Page 12971]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 28, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 6 p.m. to 9:20 p.m. at the Internal Revenue 
Service Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 
11201. For more information or to confirm attendance, notification of 
intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain 
can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. The public is invited 
to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9:20 p.m. on Wednesday, March 
28, 2001.
    Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like 
to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, 
Brooklyn, NY, 11201. The Agenda will include the following: various IRS 
issues.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: February 16, 2001.
Cathy VanHorn,
National Project Manager, Taxpayer Advocate Service.
[FR Doc. 01-4778 Filed 2-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Joseph DICKERSON, a/k/a Joseph Lee Dickerson, a/k/a Joseph L. Dickerson, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7958.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

*180Joseph Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Dickerson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition, and its subsequent order denying Dickerson’s post-judgment motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and 60(b). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Dickerson that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Dickerson has waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections after receiving proper notice.*

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 The district court granted Dickerson one thirty-day extension of time in which to file his objections, and did not abuse its discretion in denying a second extension. *See Thompson v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.,*76 F.3d 530, 534 (4th Cir.1996) (providing standard of review for denial of filing extension).
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








Board
      of
      Directors


Mace
      Security International, Inc. and Subsidiaries








We
      have
      issued our report dated June 21, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified
      opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of
      Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R) as of January 1, 2006)
      accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the 2006 Annual
      Report of Mace Security International, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for
      the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
      reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Mace Security
      International, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-87981, filed September 28, 1999,
      amended December 27, 1999, File No. 333-34096, filed April 5, 2000, File No.
      333-34536, filed April 11, 2000, File No. 333-116527, filed June 16, 2004,
      amended September 24, 2004, and File No. 333-122074, filed January 14, 2005,
      amended February 3, 2005); Form S-4 (File No. 333-89717, filed on October 26,
      1999, amended December 21, 1999) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-31757, filed on
      July 22, 1997 and File No. 333-93311, filed on December 21, 1999).








/s/
      Grant
      Thornton LLP





Philadelphia,
      Pennsylvania


June
      21,
      2007
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF MICHAEL S. DELL, CHAIRMAN AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND DONALD J. CARTY, VICE CHAIRMAN
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Date:
December 10, 2007
    
    
    
    /s/ MICHAEL S. DELLMichael S. DellChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDell Inc.
 Date:
December 10, 2007
    
    
    
    /s/ DONALD J. CARTYDonald J. CartyVice Chairman and Chief Financial OfficerDell Inc.
[No. 58649-1-I.

Division One.

October 1, 2007.]

#### Adrian Lungu, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Licensing, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 06-2-08031-9, Joan E. DuBuque, J., entered August 2, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,754,982
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,270,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,044,883
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     28,493,698
<ALLOWANCE>                                    445,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,017,853
<DEPOSITS>                                  30,821,017
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            175,888
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       950,080
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,070,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              39,017,853
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                838,378
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               61,024
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                27,418
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               926,820
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             253,292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             253,292
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          673,528
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   72,346
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                589,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,341
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      28,341
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,341
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.14
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     8,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               373,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              445,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           445,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7500

JAY TIMOTHY LURZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON P. GALLEY, Warden; LIEUTENANT ZANG; MR. ROACH; OFFICER WIERS, COII; OFFICER WIENBRENNER, COII; OFFICER WATSON, Officer, COII; SERGEANT WILSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04- 333-1-AMD) Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 11, 2005 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay Timothy Lurz, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jay Timothy Lurz appeals the district court order awarding summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing all of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of those claims on the reasoning of the district court. See Lurz v. Galley , No. CA-04- 333-1-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2004). Lurz raises a First Amendment issue for the first time in this appeal, but we decline to address this claim because Lurz failed to properly raise it in the district court. SeeMuth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (“[i]ssues raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be considered.”). We also deny Lurz’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Serotype - User Notes

# FY2023_Q2