alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiary Activities

The Company has formed the following subsidiaries:GreenPoint Bank (New York State Chartered Savings Bank)GreenPoint Community Development Corp. (New York)Headlands Mortgage Company (California)GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. (New York)GreenPoint Credit, LLC (Delaware)GPCC Mississippi, LLC (Mississippi)GP Asset LLC (Delaware)GreenPoint Mortgage Securities, Inc. (California)GreenPoint Agency Inc. (Delaware)GreenPoint Insurance Corp. (Arizona)GreenPoint Purchasing Corp. (Delaware)Headlands Insurance Agency (California)Marin Conveyancing Corp. (California)3090 Ocean Avenue Realty Corp. (New York)GreenPoint Mortgage Securities LLC (Delaware)Neerg Corp. (New York)298 15th Street Realty Corp. (New York)Neerg Second Corp. (New York)Alpha REO Corporation (New York)Beta REO Corp. (New York)GreenPoint Services LLC (New York)GreenPoint Financial Advisors LLC (Delaware)GreenPoint Business Processing Services Pvt. Ltd. (India)GreenPoint Securities LLC (Delaware)GreenPoint Mortgage Holdings LLC (Delaware)GreenPoint New Markets, L.P. (Delaware)GreenPoint Metro Agency LLC (Delaware)GreenPoint Agency LLC (Delaware)Metro Agency, Inc. (New York)GreenPoint Title Services, LLC (Delaware)


---

QuickLinks
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 18, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00072

- CV

JMI CONTRACTORS, LLC

,

Appellant

v.

Jose Manuel MEDEL LIN

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 05983

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appell ant’s reply brief is due November 21 , 20 22

. On November 1 7, 2022, appellant filed a motion requesting a twenty

- day extension of time. After consideration, we GRANT the

motion and ORDER appell ant to file its reply brief by December 1 2 , 2022.

It is so ORDE RED on November 18, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 11, 2013 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01287-CV ADRIAN BOOKER, ET AL., Appellants V. SANNA LUI CHUI, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14809
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices FitzGerald and Lewis Opinion by Justice FitzGerald The clerk’s record in this case is overdue . By letter dated June 21, 2013 we informed appellants that the District Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellants to file written verification that they had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or that they had been foun d entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellants that if they did not file the required doc umentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellants have not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the
clerk’s record.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b).

121287F.P05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ADRIAN BOOKER, ET AL, Appellants

No. 05-12-01287-CV V. SANNA LUI CHUI, ET AL, Appellees On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14809. Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lewis participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellees SANNA LUI CHUI, SHERMAN SHIN-SHIN CHUI, JESSICA SUNG-EN CHIU, LAU HUNG FAN, AND RICHTOWN INVESTMENTS, INC. recover their costs of this appeal from appellants ADRIAN BOOKE R AND NICOLE D. SMITH.

Judgment entered July 11, 2013

/Kerry P. Fitzgerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2747 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2747

  To increase the authorization for the development company loan and 
    debenture guarantee program administered by the Small Business 
                            Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1993

  Mr. LaFalce introduced the following bill which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To increase the authorization for the development company loan and 
    debenture guarantee program administered by the Small Business 
                            Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 20 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (g)(2) by striking ``$7,030,000,000'' and 
        by inserting in lieu thereof ``$7,155,000,000'';
            (2) in subsection (g)(2) by striking ``$775,000,000'' and 
        by inserting in lieu thereof ``$900,000,000'';
            (3) in subsection (i)(2) by striking ``$8,083,000,000'' and 
        by inserting in lieu thereof ``$8,458,000,000''; and
            (4) in subsection (i)(2) by striking ``$825,000,000'' and 
        by inserting in lieu thereof ``$1,200,000,000''.

                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 27, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00039

- CV

Tower Car Wash, Inc., Appellant

v.

Westport Group, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PU RYEAR, PEMBERTON, AN D BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on October 24, 2013. The par ties

have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court

agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses

the appeal

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to thi s appeal, both in this Court and the

court below.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-02903, No. 333-04712, No. 333-87124, No. 333-102109, No. 333-125291, No. 333-134031 and No. 333-143285 on Form S-8, of our report relating to the financial statements of
West Marine, Inc. dated April 4, 2008, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to a restatement and the adoption of two new accounting standards, and our report relating to the effectiveness of
West Marine, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting dated April 4, 2008 (which report expresses an adverse opinion on internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses), appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of West Marine, Inc. for the year ended December 29, 2007.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP              
|                                       
|San Francisco, California April 4,
2008
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF EXPERT





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-125362, No. 333-134296, No. 333-141321 and No. 333-147547) and Form S-8 (No. 333-142848) of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) of the findings in our
reports dated January 2008 and April 2008, with respect to the Mean Annual Recharge for the Tule Desert Hydrographic Basin, Lincoln County, Nevada appearing in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Tule Desert Groundwater Basin and Impairment of Water Assets” in the “Water Resource and Water Storage Operations” section of the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We hereby consent to all references to such reports in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and we hereby consent to all references to such reports in each such Registration Statement, and further consent to Daniel B. Stephens and Associates, Inc. being named as an expert in each such Registration Statement and in each Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement relates.





Daniel B. Stephens and Associates, Inc.








By:/s/Daniel B. Stephens


Name: Daniel B. Stephens


Title: Chairman of Board of Directors





Albuquerque, NM


November 5, 2009
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*November 13, 2009*

[Cite as *11/13/2009 Case Announcements,*2009-Ohio-5973.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2009-1368.

#### Hance v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Clermont App. No. CA2008-10-094, 2009-Ohio-2809. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file an untimely certified conflict,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2397

For the relief of Amanda E. Hart.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. HALL of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Amanda E. Hart.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND RE4 QUIREMENTS.

5 A petition filed under section 2111 of the Public

6 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–11) seeking com7 pensation from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation

8 Program for vaccine-related injuries suffered by Amanda

9 E. Hart after receiving a vaccination for diphtheria, per10 tussis, and tetanus in 1984 shall not be barred by—

11 (1) the statute of limitations contained in sec12 tion 2116(a)(1) of such Act;
2

•HR 2397 IH

1 (2) any limitation contained in section 2111(a)

2 of such Act; or

3 (3) laches.

4 SEC. 2. DEADLINE.

5 Section 1 shall apply only if a petition is filed seeking

6 the compensation referred to in section 1 within the 1-

7 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this

8 Act.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [Docket No. 01F-0026] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive petition (FAP 1B4726) proposing that the food additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of poly(hexamethylenebiguanide) hydrochloride as a preservative for food-contact paper coating formulations. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark A. Hepp, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3098. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 23, 2001 (66 FR 7498), FDA announced that a food additive petition (FAP 1B4726) had been filed by Avecia, Inc., 1405 Foulk Rd., P.O. Box 15457, Wilmington, DE 19850-5457. The petition proposed to amend the food additive regulations in § 176.170                     *Components of paper and paperboard in contact with aqueous and fatty foods*                     (21 CFR 176.170) and § 176.180                     *Components of paper and paperboard in contact with dry food*                     (21 CFR 176.180) to provide for the safe use of poly(hexamethylenebiguanide) hydrochloride as a preservative for food-contact paper coating formulations. Avecia, Inc., has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).                 

Dated: February 14, 2001. 

Alan M. Rulis, 

Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 

[FR Doc. 01-4848 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit
23.3





CONSENT
OF SNC-LAVALIN INC.








The
undersigned does hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Crystallex International Corporation, which is being
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references
to and summaries of the report, Technical Report Update on the Las Cristinas
Project, Bolivar State, Venezuela, dated November 7, 2007 (the "Incorporated
Information") included in the Annual Information Form of Crystallex
International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
"AIF").





The
undersigned does hereby confirm that he has read the AIF and the AIF fairly and
accurately represents the Incorporated Information, and the AIF does not
materially misrepresent, by omission or otherwise, any of the Incorporated
Information.





The
undersigned does also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form F-1 (No. 333-08878), on Form F-3 (Nos.
333-125380, 333-101583 and 333-91402) and on Form S-8 (No, 333-126128) of
Crystallex International Corporation of the Incorporated
Information.





Dated
this 28th day of
March, 2008.








SNC-LAVALIN
INC.





/s/
      PIERRE DUHAIMEName:
      Pierre
      DuhaimeTitle:  
      Executive
      Vice-President
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John Kyees, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-K of Urban Outfitters, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended January 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: April 1, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN E. KYEES
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | John E. Kyees Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2688

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 to revise the reserve

stock level for Burley tobacco.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1993

Mr. BOUCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 to revise

the reserve stock level for Burley tobacco.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REVISION OF RESERVE STOCK LEVEL FOR

4 BURLEY TOBACCO.

5 (a) REVISION.—Section 301(b)(14)(D) of the Agri6 cultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (7 U.S.C.

7 1301(b)(14)(D)) is amended—

8 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘50,000,000

9 pounds’’ and inserting ‘‘100,000,000 pounds’’; and
2

•HR 2688 IH

1 (2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘15 percent’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘20 percent’’.

3 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend4 ments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to

5 marketing years for Burley tobacco beginning after the

6 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

1 United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

October 8, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 03-30462

SABRINA A. SKELDON

Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT

Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana

(99-CV-1177)

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sabrina Skeldon appeals that portion of the district court’s

final judgment that denied her motion for attorney’s fees, costs,

and other equitable relief despite the jury’s verdict in her favor

on her hostile work environment claim. The Government appeals that

portion of the district court’s final judgment that denied the2

Government’s Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law as to

S keldon’s hostile work environment claim. We review Skeldon’s

challenge to the district court’s post-verdict denial of her motion

for attorney’s costs, fees, and equitable relief for an abuse of

discretion. Brady v. Fort Bend County

, 145 F.3d 691, 716 (5th Cir.

1998) (citations omitted). While our review of the district

court’s denial of the Government’s Rule 50 motion for judgment as

a matter of law is de novo , see Burge v. St. Tammany Parish , 336

F.3d 363, 368 (5th Cir. 2003), we will only overturn a jury verdict

when the evidence points “so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor

of one party that the court believes that reasonable [jurors] could

not arrive at any contrary conclusion.” B altazor v. Holmes

, 162

F.3d 368, 373 (5th Cir. 1998)(quoting Boeing v. Shipman , 411 F.2d

365, 374 (5th Cir. 1969)(en banc)).

After reviewing the record, we conclude that Skeldon has

failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in

d enying her motion for attorney’s fees, costs, and equitable

relief. We also conclude that sufficient evidence exists to

support the jury’s verdict on Skeldon’s hostile work envi ronment

clai m. Accordingly, the district court’s final judgment is

AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2116 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2116

     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
 appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the 
            United States for the vessel PRINCE OF TIDES II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1993

  Mr. Price introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
 appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the 
            United States for the vessel PRINCE OF TIDES II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and 
section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of the 
department in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel 
PRINCE OF TIDES II (official number 903858).

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-11465 on Form S-8of our reports dated March 30, 2006, relating to the financial statements ofSteinway Musical Instruments, Inc., and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. for the yearended December 31, 2005.

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Boston, Massachusetts          |
| March 30, 2006                 |

 

----
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2495

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the

State of Ohio the Senecaville National Fish Hatchery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2495 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF SENECAVILLE NATIONAL

2 FISH HATCHERY.

3 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Notwithstanding

4 any other provision of law and within 180 days after the

5 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the

6 Interior shall convey to the State of Ohio without reim7 bursement all right, title, and interest of the United States

8 in and to the property known as the Senecaville National

9 Fish Hatchery, located in Senecaville, Ohio, including—

10 (1) all easements and water rights relating to

11 that property, and

12 (2) all land, improvements, and related personal

13 property comprising that hatchery.

14 (b) USE OF PROPERTY.—All property and interests

15 conveyed under this section shall be used by the Ohio De16 partment of Natural Resources for the Ohio fishery re17 sources management program.

18 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—All right, title, and

19 interest in and to all property and interests conveyed

20 under this section shall revert to the United States on any

21 date on which any of the property or interests are used
3

•HR 2495 RFS

1 other than for the Ohio fishery resources management

2 program.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.