alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         252,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (5,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               348,084
<PP&E>                                          11,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,211
<BONDS>                                         95,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       771,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (482,427)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   357,775
<SALES>                                        142,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,264
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,909
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,909
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,909
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)



</TABLE>
JPMMT 2007-A2 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS MASTER SERVICER 1123 CERTIFICATION **Re: J.P. Morgan Mortgage Trust 2007-A2, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates**Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, the undersigned Officer, to the best of his/her knowledge, hereby certifies to the following obligations as set forth in Item 1123 of Regulation AB applicable to it: (A) a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and, (B) to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, in all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof. U.S. Bank National Association, as Master Servicer __/s/: Bryan R. Calder_________ Name:  Bryan R. Calder Title:    Executive Vice President Date: March 1, 2008
EXHIBIT 23




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 13,
2004 with respect to the 2003 consolidated financial statements of North
Bancshares, Inc., included in this annual report on Form 10-KSB, in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-82356) pertaining to the No9rth
Bancshares, Inc. 1993 Stock Based Incentive Plan.

                                    /S/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Oak Brook, Illinois
March 25, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JULY 31, 1998 AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         6,401
<SECURITIES>                                   1,461
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,411
<INVENTORY>                                   16,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              43,346
<PP&E>                                       198,029
<DEPRECIATION>                               102,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               140,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         42,702
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    55,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 140,700
<SALES>                                      343,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             344,141
<CGS>                                        333,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                341,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (7,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (3,154)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (4,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (4,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.36)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

George Green and Garlan Green,

 

 Appellants,

v.

Port of Call Homeowners Association; 

Phillip Jacobs; John Ross Bucholtz; 

Richard Pat McElroy; Randolph Harig; 

Christopher; Nancy Carothers; Alliance 

Association Management; Sharon Murphy; 

Jose Balderas; Harold Brown; and 

Niemann & Niemann, LLP,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00340-CV

Appeal from the

33rd District Court

of Llano County, Texas 

(TC# 18314)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellants’ third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until July 24, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. David C. Junkin, the Appellants’ attorney, prepare 

the Appellants’ brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 24, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2747

AN ACT

To increase the authorization for the development

tion.administered by the Small Business Administracompany loan and debenture guarantee program
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2747

AN ACT

To increase the authorization for the development company

loan and debenture guarantee program administered by

the Small Business Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 20 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631

4 note) is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (g)(2) by striking

6 ‘‘$7,030,000,000’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof

7 ‘‘$7,155,000,000’’;
2

HR 2747 EH

1 (2) in subsection (g)(2) by striking

2 ‘‘$775,000,000’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof

3 ‘‘$900,000,000’’;

4 (3) in subsection (i)(2) by striking

5 ‘‘$8,083,000,000’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof

6 ‘‘$8,458,000,000’’; and

7 (4) in subsection (i)(2) by striking

8 ‘‘$825,000,000’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof

9 ‘‘$1,200,000,000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Nos. 57420-5-I; 57469-8-I.

Division One.

August 27, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Steven Ray Heddrick, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, Nos. 05-1-08886-5 and 04-1-12703-0, Mary Yu, J., entered November 28, 2005. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded with instructions*by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Schindler, A.C.J., and Coleman, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1,2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,044,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   190,361
<INVENTORY>                                  3,149,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,469,316
<PP&E>                                       4,401,533
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,732,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,023,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,362,033
<BONDS>                                      1,584,478
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,306
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,923,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,978,943
<SALES>                                      7,593,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,593,726
<CGS>                                        6,184,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,469,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             205,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (188,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (24,928)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (163,096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (163,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 231 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 231

                    To amend the Federal Power Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mrr. LaRocco introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    To amend the Federal Power Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 9.

    Section 9(a) of the Federal Power Act is amended by adding a new 
paragraph (3) at the end thereof as follows:
            ``(3) No license may be granted for any project subject to 
        the provisions of this part unless the applicant complies with 
        all procedural and substantive requirements of the laws of the 
        State or States in which the project is located with respect to 
        the acquisition of water rights and administration of the use 
        of water. Any such license shall be subject to the applicant 
        obtaining any water rights needed for such project in 
        accordance with such requirements.''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 27.

    Section 27 of the Federal Power Act is amended--
            (1) by deleting ``used in irrigation or for municipal or 
        other uses''; and
            (2) by deleting ``therein.'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
        ``therein; and no license granted pursuant to this Act shall 
        relieve any licensee or applicant for a license from complying 
        with all procedural and substantive requirements of the laws of 
        the State in which the project is located with respect to any 
        water rights needed for such project, including any terms, 
        conditions, limitations, or other restrictions attached to such 
        rights. Nothing in this Act nor in any other Act may be 
        construed to constitute a preemption or intent to preempt the 
        procedural and substantive requirements of State law with 
        respect to the acquisition of water rights and administration 
        of the use of water or with respect to any terms, conditions, 
        limitations, or other restrictions which a State may attach to 
        any such water rights for such project.''.

                                 <all>
```
# FY16_Q3

# Percent Positives - User Notes
Form 8845

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Indian Employment Credit

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Information about Form 8845 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8845.

OMB No. 1545-1417

2015

Attachment 

Sequence No. 113

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

1 Total of qualified wages and qualified employee health insurance costs paid or incurred during the

tax year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 Calendar year 1993 qualified wages and qualified employee health insurance costs (see 

instructions). If none, enter -0- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 Incremental increase. Subtract line 2 from line 1. If zero or less, enter -0- . . . . . . . . . 3

 4 Multiply line 3 by 20% (0.20). See instructions for the adjustment you must make to salaries and 

wages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5 Indian employment credit from partnerships, S corporations, cooperatives, estates, 

and trusts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

6 Add lines 4 and 5. Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, go to line 7. Partnerships and S corporations, 

stop here and report this amount on Schedule K. All others, stop here and report this amount on

Form 3800, Part III, line 1g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

7 Amount allocated to patrons of the cooperative or beneficiaries of the estate or trust (see 

instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

8 Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, subtract line 7 from line 6. Report this amount on

Form 3800, Part III, line 1g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 16146D Form 8845 (2015)
Qualifications

FSIS is Hiring 

Consumer Safety 

Inspectors!

Follow FSIS for the latest news and updates.

Food Safety and Inspection Service

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

1 year of specialized experience gained after your 16th 

birthday that demonstrates technical skill and knowledge 

of characteristics of food commodities and substances (e.g., 

experience in quality control/lab, inspection aide, food 

inspector, public health inspector).

or

B.S. degree or full 4-year course of study in a science related 

field leading to a Bachelor’s degree from an accredited 

college/university that includes at least 24 semester hours in 

biology, physical, or agriculture sciences.

U.S. citizenship is required.

Competitive starting salary based on locality. Overtime is 

compensated and benefits are included. Visit usajobs.gov for 

more information.

Search Jobs Benefits

fsis.usda.gov/careers/job-opportunities

Browse our Career Opportunities Online

@USDAFoodSafety USDA-FSIS

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

fsis.usda.gov/careers/incentives/federal-employee-benefits-summary

Join FSIS Professionals in Protecting Public Health

The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) employs approximately 8,700 federal employees across the United States. We work

collectively to conduct a broad range of food safety activities to achieve our overall vision - that everyone’s food is safe. 

FSIS employees are highly trained, motivated, and skilled professionals.Our workforce is critical to the mission of the Agency and 

we strive to ensure that FSIS is a great place to work.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial information contained in the body of the accompanying 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1,000

<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       6-mos
<PERIOD-START>                                                May-01-1998
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             Jan-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 Jul-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                149
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      28,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          608
<INVENTORY>                                                        51,757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   84,451
<PP&E>                                                             13,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      2,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     97,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              37,358
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                               90
<OTHER-SE>                                                         44,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       97,089
<SALES>                                                            27,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   27,747
<CGS>                                                              22,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      22,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    5,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        (108)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      (789)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (1,042)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (0.12)


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7712** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. STACY DEMORIS JOHNSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 1:10

- cr - 00332

- WO

- 5; 1: 13

- cv - 00732

- WO

- LPA )

Submitted : February 25 , 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Stacy Demoris Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller , Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stacy Demoris Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the pri soner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court an d argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Michael D. WHITENER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. *464Alan FINNAN,* Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-2888.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2007.**

Decided April 10, 2007.

Michael D. Whitener, Michigan City, IN, pro se.

Before Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge, Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

*

 After this appeal was filed, Whitener was transferred to a different facility. We have substituted the warden of that facility as the respondent.

**

 After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessaiy. Thus the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

Indiana inmate Michael Whitener appeals the district court’s decision denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Whitener claims that his right to due process was violated in a prison disciplinary proceeding because insufficient evidence supported the Final Reviewing Authority’s finding that he had aided a battery. We had previously determined that, in order to resolve this issue, we needed to review the investigator’s case file and internal affairs summary that the Final Reviewing Authority relied on but that was not part of the record in the district court. We ordered a limited remand so the district court could receive these materials into the record and forward them to us. The district court has now done this, and our review of this material convinces us that “some evidence” supports the Final Reviewing Authority’s decision. *See Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst., Walpole v. Hill,*472 U.S. 445, 455-57, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985); *Webb v. Anderson,*224 F.3d 649, 652 (7th Cir.2000). Therefore we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.