alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AGUS BUDI SANTOSO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73839

Agency No. A098-511-208

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Agus Budi Santoso, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

JAN 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73839

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings,

Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the

petition for review.

Santoso does not contend he suffered past persecution, but contends he faces

future persecution based on his family’s disappointment that he is no longer a

practicing Muslim and general harm by Muslims. Substantial evidence supports

the agency’s finding that Santoso does not face a clear probability of future

persecution. See Fakhry v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1057, 1065-66 (9th Cir. 2008);

Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173, 1179 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) (a “general,

undifferentiated claim” is not a basis for relief).

In addition, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Santoso failed to establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured

if returned to Indonesia. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir.

2009). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### IN RE JOSEPH W., JR., ET AL.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18660.

*Susan T. Pearlman,*assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.

*David B. Rozwaski*and *David J. Reich,*in opposition.

Decided July 22, 2010

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 605 (AC 30476/AC 30477), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment terminating the parental rights of the father and the mother?”

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Executive Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael F. AnthonyMichael F. AnthonyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Director




Dated: December 9, 2004
2009-1452.

#### State v. Jackson.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92523. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
2009-1865.

#### In re S.S.

Licking App. No. 2009CA0040, 2009-Ohio-4520. Reported at 123 Ohio St.3d 1511, 2009-Ohio-6210, 917 N.E.2d 813. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Motion to strike statement denied as moot.
#### Adebayo COLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-2520.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 24, 2014.

Decided: April 28, 2014.

Adebayo Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Clarence Pett, Francesca Ugolini, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adebayo Cole appeals from the tax court’s order dismissing his tax court petition for failure to prosecute and upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determinations with respect to Cole’s income tax liabilities for the 2008 and 2009 tax years. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. *Cole v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue,*No. 29496-11 (U.S.T.C. June 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit32.01**

**Certification ofPrincipal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

I, Douglas L.Becker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) ofLaureate Education, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2006 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/ Douglas L. Becker                                                                           |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:     Douglas  L. Becker  Date:       March 1, 2007 |   |   |

 

----
USDA 

~ 

United State< 

Dep<1rbn~ut uf 

Agi·iculture 

Foocl Saf..ty 

.A.utl Iuspt!ctiou 

Servi ce 

Netherlands - Eligible Plants Certified to Export Egg Products to the United States 

April 13, 2023 

Updated items marked with an asterisk (*)

 EstForgnNBR Establishment Name Date Listed Date Delisted Date Relisted 

EP6063 Bouwhuis Enthoven B.V. 06/01/2015 

EP6085 Van den Burg Eiproducten B.V. 06/01/2015 

EP6153 Adriaan Goede B.V. 06/01/2015 

EP6340 B.V. Nederlandse Industrie van Eiprodukten (NIVE) 06/01/2015 

* EP6478 El, Elprod. Hand. En drogerij "Schaffelaarbos" 08/25/2015 04/11/2023 

EP6561 Elprodukten Wulro B.V. 08/25/2015 

EP6773 Frisian Egg B.V. 08/25/2015 

EP6950 Global Food Group B.V. (Ospel) 08/25/2015 

EP80040 Dutch Egg Powder Solutions B.V. (DEPS B.V.) 12/12/2017 

* Delisted Establishment Effective 4/11/2023 

Page 1
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

August 4, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00226-CV

IN RE METROPOLITAN WATER COMPANY, L.P. AND MET WATER 

VISTA RODGE, L.P., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

21st District Court

Washington County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 37412

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 30, 2022, relators Metropolitan Water Company, L.P. and Met 

Water Vista Rodge, L.P., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See 

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators

ask this court to compel the Honorable Carson Campbell, presiding judge of the 21st 

District Court of Washington County, to set aside his March 25, 2022 order directing 

relators to produce electronic storage devices for forensic imaging and discovery.
2

Relators have not shown that they are entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We also lift our stay 

order entered on March 30, 2022 and clarification order entered on April 1, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Lm là gì?

Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) là một loại vi khuẩn làm ô nhiễm thực phẩm và gây ra bệnh nhiễm 

trùng nghiêm trọng gọi là listeriosis. Ước tính có khoảng 1.600 người mắc bệnh listeriosis mỗi 

năm và khoảng 260 người tử vong. Nhiễm trùng có nhiều khả năng gây bệnh cho phụ nữ mang 

thai và trẻ sơ sinh, người lớn từ 65 tuổi trở lên và những người có hệ miễn dịch yếu.

Tại sao nhiễm Lm là mối lo ngại tại cơ sở bán lẻ?

Lm có thể ẩn náu trong môi trường sản xuất thực phẩm và khu vực bảo quản lạnh. Việc Lm truyền từ môi 

trường, thiết bị, nhân viên hoặc thực phẩm sống là một mối nguy đáng lo ngại đặc biệt trong đồ nguội bán 

lẻ. Các sản phẩm thực phẩm, môi trường, thiết bị thực phẩm và thực hành của nhân viên đều là những 

nguồn lây nhiễm Lm tiềm ẩn tại cơ sở bán lẻ. Nhiễm Lm khiến các sản phẩm thịt nguội và gia cầm bị tạp 

nhiễm và không an toàn để ăn.

Các nhà bán lẻ có thể thực hiện những bước nào để kiểm soát Lm tại cửa hàng bán lẻ?

Loại bỏ các sản phẩm tạp 

nhiễm rõ ràng (ví dụ: tóc 

hoặc côn trùng trên sản 

phẩm, v.v.) có trong đồ

nguội bán lẻ.

Loại bỏ các điều kiện cơ sở trong khu vực đồ nguội hoặc 

khu vực bảo quản có thể khiến sản phẩm bị tạp nhiễm (ví 

dụ: hơi nước ngưng tụ nhỏ giọt trên sản phẩm không được 

che đậy, bụi xây dựng hoặc thiết bị bị hỏng).

Đảm bảo không tồn tại các điều kiện không 

hợp vệ sinh (ví dụ: ruồi, phân của loài gặm 

nhấm, nấm mốc hoặc bề mặt bẩn) ở nơi sơ 

chế, đóng gói và bảo quản các sản phẩm thịt 

và gia cầm nguội.

Không sơ chế hoặc bảo quản các sản 

phẩm thịt nguội hoặc gia cầm gần 

hoặc ngay cạnh các sản phẩm sống.

Che đậy, bọc hoặc bảo vệ tất 

cả các sản phẩm thịt nguội 

hoặc gia cầm đã mở nắp khi 

không sử dụng để tránh lây 

nhiễm chéo.

8 sạch Đảm bảo nhân viên luôn rửa 

Làm sạch và vệ sinh 

thiết bị dùng để chế

biến các sản phẩm 

đồ nguội ít nhất 4 

giờ một lần.

Làm lạnh các sản 

phẩm thịt nguội 

hoặc gia cầm ngay 

sau khi sử dụng (ví 

dụ: cắt lát).

4

1 2

3

5 6 7

Kiểm soát Listeria 

monocytogenes

(Lm) trong Đồ nguội bán lẻ
tay đúng cách và đeo găng tay 

dùng một lần trước khi xử lý 

các sản phẩm đồ nguội.

Quét Mã QR liên kết đến Hướng dẫn 

Kiểm soát Lm tại Cơ sở bán lẻ.

USDA là nhà cung cấp cơ hội bình đẳng, nhà tuyển dụng và bên cho vay. Tháng 8 năm 

2023
No. 06- 15

- 00222

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BENJAIMIN ROBERT CAIN III, Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

APPEA LED FROM THE 71 ST DISTRICT COURT

HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. 13-0257X

STATE’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING APPELLEE ’ S BRIEF

COKE SOLOMON

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS

P.O. BOX 776

MARSHALL, TEXAS 75671

(903) 935-4840

BY: LAURA M. CARPENTER

ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

BAR #08618050

ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE ACCEPTED

06-15-00222-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

6/23/2016 3:51:10 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK2

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee herein, and pursuant to Rule

10.5 (b), TEX.R.APP.PROC., and pursuant to the extension policies of this Court,

makes this request to extend filing the brief in this cause and would show as follows:

I.

The deadline for filing Appellee’s brief i s June 23, 2016

.

II.

Appellee requests an addition seven ( 7 ) days in which to complete the brief.

III.

Appellee’s counsel has been o verwhelmed with additional county duties

,

including but not limited to writ responses, mental hearings, open records responses,

and contractual reviews, and has not had adequate time to complete her brief.

Additionally, the motion to suppress transcript was recently provided to counsel two

days ago which has a significant bearing on the appellant ’ s argument.

III.

With a grant of an additional seven ( 7 ) days Appellee w ill be able to have the

brief written and submitted to the Court.

IV.3

There has previously been no motion filed for extension of time, or grants of time

extended to Appelle e , for the filing of Appellee’s brief.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee,

respectfully requests that this Honorable Court of Appeals will, upon reviewing this

Motion, gra nt the extension of time for filing Appellee’s brief as requested herein, and

for such other relief to which Appellee may be entitled.

.

Respectfully Submitted

Coke Solomon

Criminal District Attorney

Harrison County, Texas

By: /s/

___ Laura M. Carpenter

Laura M. Carpenter

, Assistant District Attorney

Bar Card #08618050

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of t he foregoing Appellee’s Brief has

been faxed to the attorney for Appellant, Vernard Solomon , this 23 rd day of J une , 201 6.

/s/___Laura M. Carpenter
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2733 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2733

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
                  documentation for the vessel TESSA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 1993

 Mr. Hall of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
                  documentation for the vessel TESSA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106 and 12107 
of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel TESSA (official 
number 675130), with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade of the United States and on the Great Lakes and their 
tributary and connecting waters in trade with Canada.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Country Net Weight 

Presented Percentage Cumulative

CANADA 1,679,425,407 40.24% 40.24%

AUSTRALIA 735,098,320 17.61% 57.86%

NEW ZEALAND 485,104,816 11.62% 69.48%

MEXICO 466,654,052 11.18% 80.66%

POLAND 149,436,620 3.58% 84.25%

NICARAGUA 102,575,560 2.46% 86.70%

CHILE 95,169,171 2.28% 88.98%

URUGUAY 91,118,501 2.18% 91.17%

BRAZIL 87,761,462 2.10% 93.27%

DENMARK 76,158,127 1.82% 95.10%

VIETNAM 71,520,134 1.71% 96.81%

SPAIN 22,329,844 0.54% 97.34%

NETHERLANDS 21,523,980 0.52% 97.86%

ITALY 20,209,109 0.48% 98.34%

COSTA RICA 18,198,985 0.44% 98.78%

UNITED KINGDOM 15,148,668 0.36% 99.14%

IRELAND 14,367,443 0.34% 99.49%

CHINA 4,623,443 0.11% 99.60%

NORTHERN IRELAND 4,402,153 0.11% 99.70%

ISRAEL 2,927,976 0.07% 99.77%

GERMANY 2,909,507 0.07% 99.84%

KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 1,292,796 0.03% 99.87%

HONDURAS 1,290,031 0.03% 99.91%

FINLAND 1,090,625 0.03% 99.93%

HUNGARY 698,100 0.02% 99.95%

JAPAN 679,911 0.02% 99.97%

ICELAND 542,007 0.01% 99.98%

FRANCE 230,131 0.01% 99.98%

LITHUANIA 222,882 0.01% 99.99%

CROATIA 195,807 0.00% 99.99%

AUSTRIA 49,081 0.00% 99.99%

MYANMAR 46,546 0.00% 100.00%

SAN MARINO 46,399 0.00% 100.00%

GUYANA 31,375 0.00% 100.00%

BANGLADESH 27,085 0.00% 100.00%

PAKISTAN 25,476 0.00% 100.00%

THAILAND 21,160 0.00% 100.00%

NIGERIA 18,380 0.00% 100.00%

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 2,240 0.00% 100.00%

Total Presented 4,173,173,310 100.00%

United Kingdom includes England, Scotland and Wales - which are under one inspection system.

Northern Ireland is under a separate inspection system and is listed separately.

These data are for meat and poultry imports. 

Egg product imports in 2017= 10,370,534 pounds. 

All egg product imports were from Canada and 

Netherlands.

2017 Import Data

Office of Field Operations

Import Inspection Operations

Food Safety and Inspection Service
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Cubist") on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael W. Bonney, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cubist, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Cubist.

February 27,
2009

|                                                                              |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ MICHAEL W. BONNEY Michael W. Bonney President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Financial Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) |  | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 2, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 2, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Philip W. RoizinPhilip W. RoizinExecutive Vice President, Finance and
Administration, Treasurer and Secretary and Chief Financial Officer




Dated: September 16, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory J. Rizzo, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2010 |  | /s/ Gregory J. Rizzo                                                                                                                                                                        
|                     |  | Gregory J. Rizzo President
and Chief Executive Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners,
LP
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Peak Resources Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Olson, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Larry Olson

Larry Olson 
Principal Executive Officer 
November 29, 2007