alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 13

                             FORM 906 CERTIFICATION

      The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with
the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

      Mario Valcarce, the Chief Executive Officer and Alfredo Ergas, the Chief
Financial Officer of Enersis, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Enersis.

      Date: June 30, 2004

                                         /s/ Mario Valcarce
                                        ---------------------------------
                                         Mario Valcarce
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                         /s/ Alfredo Ergas
                                        ---------------------------------
                                         Alfredo Ergas
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit
Properties Inc., general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted
pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


/s/ David Salzman
------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
partner of the Registrant
November 13, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

SHAMAR STANFORD, 

Defendant BelowAppellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff BelowAppellee. 

§ 

§ No. 141, 2018 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below: Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID 1511011810 (N) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: May 14, 2018 

 Decided: May 16, 2018 

ORDER 

This 16th day of May 2018, it appears to the Court that, on April 4, 2018, 

the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file his notice of appeal in a 

timely manner. The appellant failed to respond to the notice to show cause 

within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is 

deemed to be unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme 

Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

Justice
Exhibit 31.1
Cronos Global Income Fund XV
Rule 13a-14 Certifications
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cronos Global Income Fund XV (the“Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of theRegistrant, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and wehave:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 24, 2005   /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ    Dennis J Tietz  President and Chief Executive Officer of CCC
2009-1652.

#### State v. Newell.

Erie App. No. E-08-067, 2009-Ohio-3810.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 9, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D12-3314

Lower Tribunal No. 12-11491

________________

Noel Taylor,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rodney Smith,

Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler and Maria E.

Lauredo, Assistant Public Defenders, and Jeffrey Paul Desousa, Certified Legal

Intern, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brent J. Kelleher, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.
Noel Taylor appeals from his convictions and sentences for indecent

exposure and assault. We find no merit in the arguments raised with regard to his

conviction and sentence on the assault charge and therefore affirm the conviction

and sentence on that count without discussion. However, we reverse Taylor’s

conviction and sentence for indecent exposure because the evidence adduced

below, when viewed in a light most favorable to the State, was insufficient to

demonstrate that Taylor exposed or exhibited his sexual organs in a place intended

or designed to be frequented or resorted to by the public. See §800.03, Fla. Stat.

(2012) (in pertinent part, making it “unlawful to expose or exhibit one’s sexual

organs in public or on the private premises of another, or so near thereto as to be

seen from such private premises”); Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.9 (defining a

“public place” as “any place intended or designed to be frequented or resorted to

by the public”); Basulto-Rodriguez v. State, 95 So. 3d 403, 406 n.5 (Fla. 3d DCA

2012) (“We review de novo the trial court’s denial of a motion for JOA, to

determine solely whether the evidence is legally sufficient. In reviewing the denial

of the motion, we consider the evidence and all reasonable inferences in a light

most favorable to the State as the non-moving party.”) (internal citations omitted.);

A.S.F. v. State, 70 So. 3d 754, 756 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (same).

Accordingly, Taylor’s convictions and sentences are affirmed in part and

reversed in part.

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1356-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1356-DR), dated January 8, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

February 6, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that, effective this date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I hereby appoint Justo Hernandez of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster. 

This action terminates my appointment of A. David Rodham as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

G. Clay Hollister,

Acting Chief of Staff.

[FR Doc. 01-4599 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 2 1- 0512

STATE OF MONTANA

,

P laintiff and Appell ee ,

v.

CLOVIS CHRISTOPHER GENO

,

Defendant and Appell ant

.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1),

the Appellant is given an extension of time until February 24 , 2023 to

prepare, file and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2023

01/25/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0512
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2051 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2051

      To modify the project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1993

  Mr. King (for himself and Mr. Levy) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To modify the project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expedited Shoreline Resources 
Improvement Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. JONES INLET, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York, is modified to 
direct the Secretary to place noncontaminated dredged material on beach 
areas downdrift from the federally maintained channel, at full Federal 
expense, for the purpose of mitigating the interruption of littoral 
system natural processes caused by the jetty and continued dredging of 
the federally maintained channel.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.01
                                  ALUMAX INC.
 
                    CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                    (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   YEAR ENDED          YEAR ENDED          YEAR ENDED
                                                DECEMBER 31, 1997   DECEMBER 31, 1996   DECEMBER 31, 1995
                                                -----------------   -----------------   -----------------
<S>                                             <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Basic Earnings per common share:
   1. Net earnings............................       $  33.7             $ 250.0             $ 237.4
   2. Deduct -- Series A Convertible Preferred
      Dividends...............................                              (9.3)               (9.3)
                                                     -------             -------             -------
   3. Earnings applicable to common shares....       $  33.7             $ 240.7             $ 228.1
                                                     =======             =======             =======
   4. Average common shares outstanding
      (in thousands)..........................        54,735              45,731              44,637
                                                     =======             =======             =======
   5. Basic earnings per common share
      (line 3 divided by line 4)..............       $  0.62             $  5.26             $  5.11
                                                     =======             =======             =======
Diluted earnings per common share:
   6. Earnings applicable to common shares....       $  33.7             $ 240.7             $ 228.1
   7. Add -- Series A Convertible Preferred
      Dividends...............................                               9.3                 9.3
                                                     -------             -------             -------
   8. Net earnings............................       $  33.7             $ 250.0             $ 237.4
                                                     =======             =======             =======
   9. Average diluted shares outstanding (in
      thousands)..............................        55,721              55,211              54,761
                                                     =======             =======             =======
  10. Diluted earnings per common share
      (line 8 divided by line 9)..............       $  0.60             $  4.53             $  4.34
                                                     =======             =======             =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott Gomez, as Vice President of Finance and Accounting of Hollywood Media
Corp. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the
accompanying Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   March 30, 2004                           By:  /s/ Scott Gomez
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      Scott Gomez,
                                                      Vice President of Finance
                                                      and Accounting
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10312

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

COREY HOLMES, also known as Blue,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-89-2

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Corey Holmes has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Holmes has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 12, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-10312 Document: 00511027319 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2310

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to require the

Secretary of the Army to consider the loss of life which may be associated

with flooding and coastal storm events in the formulation and evaluation

of flood control projects to be carried out by the Secretary.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey (for himself, Ms. SHEPHERD, Mr. GALLO, Mr.

MENENDEZ, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. JEFFERSON, and Mr. MICA) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works

and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986

to require the Secretary of the Army to consider the

loss of life which may be associated with flooding and

coastal storm events in the formulation and evaluation

of flood control projects to be carried out by the Secretary.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preservation of Life

5 Through Water Resources Planning Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2310 IH

1 SEC. 2. LOSS OF LIFE PREVENTION.

2 Section 904 of the Water Resources Development Act

3 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281) is amended to read as follows:

4 ‘‘SEC. 904. MATTERS TO BE ADDRESSED IN PLANNING.

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Enhancing national economic

6 development (including benefits to particular regions of

7 the Nation not involving the transfer of economic activity

8 to such regions from other regions), the quality of the total

9 environment (including preservation and enhancement of

10 the environment), and the prevention of loss of life shall

11 each be considered equally in the formulation and evalua12 tion of water resources projects to be carried out by the

13 Secretary, and associated benefits and costs, both quan14 tifiable and unquantifiable, shall be displayed in the bene15 fits and costs of such projects.

16 ‘‘(b) ADDITIONAL MATTERS.—In addition to the

17 matters described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall

18 consider the well-being of the people of the United States

19 and the preservation of cultural and historical values in

20 the formulation and evaluation of water resources projects

21 to be carried out by the Secretary.

22 ‘‘(c) LOSS OF LIFE PREVENTION.—In computing the

23 benefits and costs of a flood control project to be carried

24 out by the Secretary, the Secretary shall consider the loss

25 of life which may be associated with flooding and coastal

26 storm events. For such purposes, the Secretary shall quan-
3

•HR 2310 IH

1 tify, in monetary terms and using reasonable methods, a

2 fair value on the preservation of human life.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>0001038358
<NAME>IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, L.P. - 1993
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1993
<CASH>                                          27,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         791,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 740,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        513,943
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   740,120
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,820
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (12,487)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>