alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Order Entered August 22, 2013:*

#### Daniel Adair v State of Michigan,

Docket No. 302142.

Pursuant to the opinion issued concurrently with this order, the motion to expedite consideration of objections to special master’s report pursuant to MCR 7.206(E)(2) is denied as moot. Additionally, this case is referred to Special Master Michael Warren for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this Court. We retain jurisdiction.

Proceedings on referral in this matter shall commence within 28 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order, and they shall be given priority until they are concluded. As stated in the accompanying opinion, * the Special Master shall take proofs and make factual findings regarding plaintiffs claim that the existing appropriations do not fully fund the necessary costs of the CEPI mandates. The proceedings before the Special Master are limited to this issue only. The parties shall file with this Court a copy of all pleadings and documents filed with the Special Master. The Special Masters’s findings of fact and other determinations shall be made in a written report to be filed with this Court. Transcripts of the proceedings before the Special Master shall be transmitted to this Court within 21 days after the issuance of the Special Master’s report. The parties shall have 21 days from the filing of the transcripts in which to file objections to the Special Master’s report. The objections shall be accompanied by a supporting brief and exhibits. Answers to the objections made by opposing parties shall be filed within 14 days of the filing of the objections.

*

*Reported at 302 Mich App 305-Reporter.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         231,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,612
<PP&E>                                           1,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                     813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           455
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,352
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00944-CR

Rickie RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR4578

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED January 30, 2019.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Clinton H. HowardClinton H. HowardChairman of the BoardandChief Executive OfficerNovember 12, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2677 Received in Senate (RDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2677

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
 plan, design, and construct the West Court of the National Museum of 
                       Natural History building.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF WEST COURT OF NATIONAL 
              MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY BUILDING.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to plan, design, and construct the West Court of the National Museum of 
Natural History building.

SEC. 2. FUNDING.

    No appropriated funds may be used to pay any expense of the 
planning, design, and construction authorized by section 1.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50080.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 11, 2014.

Rebecca Suzanne Kanter, Assistant U.S., Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Vicki Marolt Buchanan, Esquire, Lexington, KY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jonathan Rojas, Sonoma, CA, pro se.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jonathan Rojas appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rojas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rojas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Rojas has waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. *See id.*at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 265

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the exclusion from gross income of amounts paid for employee educational assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. MCCANDLESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

permanent the exclusion from gross income of amounts

paid for employee educational assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Educational

5 Assistance Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 265 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PRO2 GRAMS.

3 (a) EXCLUSION MADE PERMANENT.—Section 127 of

4 the Internal Revenue Code (relating to educational assist5 ance programs) is amended by striking subsection (d).

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

8 December 31, 1992.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Arizona Land Income Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R. Hislop, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas R. HislopThomas R. Hislop Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Arizona Land Income Corporation


May 15, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.1




Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pressure BioSciences, Inc.,
a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Richard T. Schumacher, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code) that:





(1)
  The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: November
      16, 2009
              By:
              /s/Richard T.
      SchumacherRichard
      T. Schumacher
                President
      & Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### DAVID R. ALLEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued February 21, 1996

Decided March 5, 1996.

Before Judges PRESSLER and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.

*Joseph Fogelson,*Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant *(Deborah T. Poritz,*Attorney General, attorney; *Joseph L. Yannotti*Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; *Mr. Fogelson,*on the brief).

*705
      *David R. Allen,*appellant, appeared pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Tax Court, whose opinion is reported at 14 *N.J. Tax*385 (Tax Court 1994), is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Small.
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-21173), (Form S-3 No. 333-38219), (Form S-3 No.
333-57855), (Form S-3 No. 333-68209), (Form S-3 No. 333-48380), (Form S-3 No.
333-64262), (Form S-3 No. 333-91090) of Hollywood Media Corp. and in the related
Prospectus', in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-14659) and (Form
S-8 No. 333-45098) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and
Directors Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-62152) pertaining to the
Hollywood Media Corp. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, 401(k) Plan and the Director's
Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 26, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Hollywood Media Corp. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida
March 29, 2004
[No. 24585-3-III.

Division Three.

August 7, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David Elliath Sukin, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 05-1-02077-7, Gregory D. Sypolt, J., entered October 11, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Brown and Kulik, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         315,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,220,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                   609,506
<INVENTORY>                                  6,971,229
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,880,586
<PP&E>                                       9,898,356
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,450,807)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,297,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,238,948
<BONDS>                                        910,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,678
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,297,292
<SALES>                                      9,417,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,836,885
<CGS>                                        5,022,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,205,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,197,969)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   310,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,887,449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.84)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 12.5**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Luca D’Agnese certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 20-F/A of Enersis Américas S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: September 7, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,409,917
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,429,066
<PP&E>                                       1,404,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                 636,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,283,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,189,988
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       536,395     
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,283,498
<SALES>                                        610,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               610,878
<CGS>                                          625,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  625,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,582,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,485,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,485,550)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,485,550)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12821-12823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4862]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals

February 1, 2001.
    Section 1014(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires a monthly report listing all 
budget authority for the current fiscal year for which, as of the first 
day of the month, a special message had been transmitted to Congress.
    This report gives the status, as of February 1, 2001, of two 
deferrals contained in one special message for FY 2001. The message was 
transmitted to Congress on January 18, 2001.

Deferrals (Attachments A and B)

    As of February 1, 2001, $1.8 billion in budget authority was being 
deferred from obligation. Attachment B shows the status of each 
deferral reported during FY 2001.

Information from Special Message

    The special message containing information on the deferrals that 
are covered by this cumulative report is printed in the edition of the 
Federal Register cited below:

66 FR 8985, Monday, February 5, 2001.

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.,
Director.
Attachments.

Attachment A

                       Status of FY 2001 Deferrals
                        [In millions of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Budgetary
                                                              resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferrals proposed by the President........................      1,946.7
Routine Executive releases through February 1, 2001........       -116.5
Overturned by the Congress.................................
                                                            ------------
Currently before the Congress..............................      1,830.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 12822]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28FE01.000


[[Page 12823]]

[FR Doc. 01-4862 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P