alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form 8864

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Fuels Credit

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Information about Form 8864 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8864.

OMB No. 1545-1924

2015

Attachment 

Sequence No. 141

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

Caution: You cannot claim any amounts on Form 8864 that you claimed (or will claim) on Form 720 (Schedule C), Form

8849, or Form 4136. 

Claimant has a certificate from the producer or importer of biodiesel or renewable diesel reported on lines 1 through 6 

below and, if applicable, claimant also has a statement from the reseller. Claimant has no reason to believe that the 

information in the certificate or statement is false. Claimant may need to attach a copy of the certificate and statement. 

See Certification in the instructions.

Type of Fuel

(a) 

Number of Gallons 

Sold or Used

(b) 

Rate

(c) 

Column (a) x Column (b) 

1 Biodiesel (other than agri-biodiesel) . . . . . . . . . 1 

2 Agri-biodiesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 Renewable diesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 Biodiesel (other than agri-biodiesel) included in a biodiesel 

mixture. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5 Agri-biodiesel included in a biodiesel mixture . . . . . . 5

6 Renewable diesel included in a renewable diesel mixture . . 6

7 Qualified agri-biodiesel production . . . . . . . . . 7 

8 Add lines 1 through 7. Include this amount in your income for 2015 (see instructions) . . . . . 8

9 Biodiesel and renewable diesel fuels credit from partnerships, S corporations, cooperatives, 

estates, and trusts (see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

10 Add lines 8 and 9. Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, go to line 11. Partnerships and 

S corporations, stop here and report this amount on Schedule K. All others, stop here and report 

this amount on Form 3800, Part III, line 1l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

11 Amount allocated to patrons of the cooperative or beneficiaries of the estate or trust (see 

instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

12 Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, subtract line 11 from line 10. Report this amount on Form 3800, 

Part III, line 1l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 25778F Form 8864 (2015)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2570 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2570

 To amend the Act of September 30, 1950, to provide that certain lands 
  administered by the National Forest Service shall be deemed to have 
fulfilled certain requirements relating to Federal acquisition of real 
                               property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1993

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Act of September 30, 1950, to provide that certain lands 
  administered by the National Forest Service shall be deemed to have 
fulfilled certain requirements relating to Federal acquisition of real 
                               property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1950.

    Section 2 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st 
Congress; 20 U.S.C. 237) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
    ``(g) Beginning with the fiscal year 1994, any school district 
which, as demonstrated by written evidence from the National Forest 
Service or the Department of the Interior satisfactory to the 
Secretary, contains land administered by the National Forest Service 
consisting of the Buffalo Gap, the Fort Pierre, or the Grand River 
National Grasslands shall be deemed to have met the requirements of 
subsection (a)(1)(C).''.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Review)] 

## Determination 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission determines,[2]                                          pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

                    The Commission instituted this review on December 1, 1999 (64 FR 67315) and determined on March 3, 2000, that it would conduct a full review (65 FR 13989, March 15, 2000). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 30, 2000 (65 FR 52784). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on December 19, 2000, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.                 

The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation to the Secretary of Commerce on February 21, 2001. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3393 (February 2001), entitled Fresh Garlic from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Review). 

Issued: February 22, 2001.

By order of the Commission. 

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                     
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Dennis M. Devaney not participating.                     
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 01-4834 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
| **Common Stock Common Stock (Details)**                                       | 3 Months Ended |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]** |           |
| Document Period End Date                                                      | Mar. 31,  2019 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The end date of the period reflected on the cover page if a periodic report. For all other reports and registration statements containing historical data, it is the date up through which that historical data is presented.  If there is no historical data in the report, use the filing date. The format of the date is CCYY-MM-DD.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate**Namespace Prefix:**dei_**Data Type:**xbrli:dateItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_DisclosureOfCompensationRelatedCostsSharebasedPaymentsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Dark Dynamite Inc (the
      "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lei,
      Ming, our Chief Executive Officer, certify that:




*
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




*
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                our
                consolidated financial condition and results of
                operations.






/s/
      Lei, Ming


Lei,
      Ming


Director,
      President and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      May
      20, 2007




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 25, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00050

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., ET AL CHILDREN

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 00237

Honorable Richard Garcia , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The clerk’s record was due by February 22, 2021, but was not filed. On that day, the district clerk filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension until March 2, 2021 to file

the record.

After consideration, we GRANT the district clerk’s request and ORDER the district

clerk to file the clerk’s record by March 2, 2021

. The district clerk is reminded that strict deadlines exist with regard to the disposal of appeals dealing with the termination of parental rights.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of February, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2581 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2581

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make a grant to the State 
   of Tennessee for the purpose of erecting a highway sign to inform 
   motorists of the location of the Living Heritage Museum in McMinn 
                           County, Tennessee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make a grant to the State 
   of Tennessee for the purpose of erecting a highway sign to inform 
   motorists of the location of the Living Heritage Museum in McMinn 
                           County, Tennessee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGHWAY SIGN FOR LIVING HERITAGE MUSEUM, McMINN COUNTY, 
              TENNESSEE.

    (a) Grant.--The Secretary of Transportation shall make a grant to 
the State of Tennessee for the purpose of erecting a highway sign on 
Interstate Route 75 at Exit 49 to inform motorists of the location of 
the Living Heritage Museum in McMinn County, Tennessee.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of erecting the 
highway sign described in subsection (a) shall be 100 percent.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,820,662
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  614,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      81,849,028
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,710,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,129,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,201,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,274
<COMMON>                                         1,610
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,470,346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,129,314
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,697,061
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,571,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             632,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                493,123
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            493,123
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   493,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        


</TABLE>
*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20793

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CR-H-96-65-2)

July 15, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nelson Brown appeals his conviction and sentence following a jury trial for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and aiding and abetting
 

1

 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), 846.

 

2 United States v. Harvey, 897 F.2d 1300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1003 (1990),

overruled on other grounds, United States v. Lambert, 984 F.2d 658 (5th Cir. 1993) (en

banc); United States v. Gant, 691 F.2d 1159 (5th Cir. 1982).

 

3 United States v. Willis, 38 F.3d 170 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 2585

(1995).

2

to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base.1 Brown contends that: (1) the

evidence demonstrated his actions were committed under duress; (2) the district

court committed plain error in instructing the jury that he had the burden to prove

the affirmative defense of duress by a preponderance of the evidence; (3) the

district court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the

government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he conspired to possess

with intent to distribute cocaine base; and (4) the prosecutor’s improper statements

during closing argument substantially affected his right to a fair trial.

Assuming per arguendo that the issue that a preponderance of the evidence

demonstrated thatBrown’s actions were committed under duressis cognizable, our

review of the record persuadesthat Brown did not demonstrate at trial that he acted

under duress.2 The district court did not commit plain error in instructing the jury

on Brown’s duress defense.3 The evidence before the jury was sufficient to support
 

4 United States v. Stephens, 964 F.2d 424 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Maltos, 985

F.2d 743 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Ramirez, 963 F.2d 693 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

506 U.S. 944 (1992).

 

5 United States v. Andrews, 22 F.3d 1328 (5th cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 941 (1994).

3

the conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine base with intent to distribute.4

Finally, we conclude that Brown’sright to a fair trial was notsubstantially affected

by comments by the prosecutor during closing argument.5 The challenged

comments by the prosecutor, albeit inappropriate, did not rise to the level of

tainting the trial.

The convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
KEVIN LEE ELLIOTT , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5527

_____________________________/ Opinion filed September 5, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell L. Healey , Judge

. Kevin Elliot, p ro s e, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. Kevin Lee Elliott challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief , which failed to attach records that conclusively demonstrate no entitlement to relief . In addition, he challenges the trial court’s failure to conduct an evidentiary hearing or allow amendment of his pleadings

. We reverse to require
that the trial court either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute Elliott’s claims in counts one, four, seven, and eight of his complaint, or absent such2 records, hold an evidentiary hearing. See Washington v. State , 10 So. 3d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ( A bsent attach ment of portions of the record that conclusively
refute claims , a “summary denial is improper, and an evidentiary hearing is required.”). As to other counts, Elliott should be given the opportunity to amend his claim

. See Spera v. Sta te , 971 So. 2d 754, 762 (Fla. 2007) (“[W]hen a defendant’s initial rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief is determined to be legally insufficient for failure to meet either the rule’s or other pleading requirements, the trial court abuses its discret ion when it fails to allow the defendant at least one opportunity to amend the motion.” ).

REVERSED AND REMANDED

. WOLF , MAKAR , and M.K. THOMAS , J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald S. BlaskieVice President and Chief Financial Officer ofSuperconductive Components, Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)May 3, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 01F-0026]


Avecia, Inc.; Withdrawal of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 1B4726) proposing that the food additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of poly(hexamethylenebiguanide) 
hydrochloride as a preservative for food-contact paper coating 
formulations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark A. Hepp, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of January 23, 2001 (66 FR 7498), FDA announced that a food 
additive petition (FAP 1B4726) had been filed by Avecia, Inc., 1405 
Foulk Rd., P.O. Box 15457, Wilmington, DE 19850-5457. The petition 
proposed to amend the food additive regulations in Sec. 176.170 
Components of paper and paperboard in contact with aqueous and fatty 
foods (21 CFR 176.170) and Sec. 176.180 Components of paper and 
paperboard in contact with dry food (21 CFR 176.180) to provide for the 
safe use of poly(hexamethylenebiguanide) hydrochloride as a 
preservative for food-contact paper coating formulations. Avecia, Inc., 
has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 
CFR 171.7).

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 01-4848 Filed 2-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F