alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Banoro GARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIAL CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-7520.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2007.

Decided: March 28, 2007.

Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Banoro Garrett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel filed in his Title VII action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Garrett seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Michael Dorsey NEEDHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Keith WHITENER, Administrator, Alexander Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-8038.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 24, 2014.

Decided: April 28, 2014.

Michael Dorsey Needham, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*244PER CURIAM:

Michael Dorsey Needham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85,120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Needham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6552

ALEXANDER WALDEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL L. HOBBS, Custodian, Jesup Federal

Correctional Institution; J. RENÉ JOSEY, US

Attorney for SC; JANET RENO, US Attorney

General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-3782-4-8BF, CR-89-353, CR-90-170)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Walden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Walden appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) and denying the motion to alter or amend the

judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and the order

denying the motion to alter or amend and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Walden v. Hobbs, No. CA-00-3782-4-8BF (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 2001 & Mar.

13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,649,992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,164,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,004,806
<PP&E>                                      11,581,080
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,337,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,672,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,523,307
<BONDS>                                     17,890,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,952
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,234,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,672,289
<SALES>                                      1,328,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,220,585
<CGS>                                        (755,281)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (7,089,196)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,159,925)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,783,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 Aerial Photography
 Geospatial Enterprise Operations Home Page Customer ServicesData ManagementData InspectionTechnology Coordination
 The Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) website content has moved to Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC) Geospatial Enterprise Operations (GEO). Please visit our new FPAC Geospatial Enterprise Operations (GEO) website.
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SCI Engineered Materials, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Daniel Rooney, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Daniel RooneyDaniel
                RooneyChairman
                of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer ofSCI
                Engineered Materials, Inc.(Principal
                Executive Officer)November
                5, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,778,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  264,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,224
<INVENTORY>                                    316,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,471,584
<PP&E>                                       2,115,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                 252,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,335,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          578,504
<BONDS>                                        499,742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,392,644
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,173,344)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,335,112
<SALES>                                        399,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,713
<CGS>                                          393,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  393,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               553,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (544,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (544,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (544,059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11299-11300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, NCCAM SEP C-10.
    Date: March 8, 2001.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

[[Page 11300]]

    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Building II, Room 106, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lawrence R. Haller, National Center for 
Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of 
Health, 31 Center Drive, Room 5B50, Bethesda, MD 20892-2182, (301) 
402-9011, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#137f7b222a2767537d7a7b3d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="523e3a636b6626123c3b3a7c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.


    Dated: February 15, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-4442 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Form 3903

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Moving Expenses 

Go to www.irs.gov/Form3903 for instructions and the latest information. 

Attach to Form 1040, 1040-SR, or 1040-NR. 

OMB No. 1545-0074 

2022

Attachment 

Sequence No. 170 

Name(s) shown on return Your social security number 

Before you begin: You can deduct moving expenses only if you are a Member of the Armed Forces on active duty and, due to a 

military order, you, your spouse, or your dependents move because of a permanent change of station. 

Check here to certify that you meet these requirements. See the instructions . . . . . . . . . . .

1 Transportation and storage of household goods and personal effects (see instructions) . . . . . 1 

2 Travel (including lodging) from your old home to your new home (see instructions). Do not include the

cost of meals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3 Add lines 1 and 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 Enter the total amount the government paid you for the expenses listed on lines 1 and 2 that is not 

included in box 1 of your Form W-2 (wages). This amount should be shown in box 12 of your Form

W-2 with code P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 Is line 3 more than line 4? 

No. You cannot deduct your moving expenses. If line 3 is less than line 4, subtract line 3 from

line 4 and include the result on Form 1040, 1040-SR, 1040-NR, line 1h. 

Yes. Subtract line 4 from line 3. Enter the result here and on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 14. 

This is your moving expense deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see your tax return instructions. Cat. No. 12490K Form 3903 (2022)
#### Joseph KINARD, Appellant v. OFFICE OF BAR COUNSEL, Board on Professional Responsibility, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-7099.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 11, 2011.

Joseph Kinard, Oxford, WI, pro se.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, ROGERS, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 22, 2010, be affirmed. Whatever the scope of appellant’s right of access to Bar Counsel records, the 1997 and 2009 letters filed as exhibits to his brief indicate that the appellees do not have copies of the oath of office at issue here, and appellant offers nothing undermining this conclusion. We therefore affirm the dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
**
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION
**

Washington, D.C. 20549

**
FORM 10-Q
**

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
Commission file number: 0-16946
**LabOne, Inc.

10101 Renner Blvd.

Lenexa, Kansas 66219

(913) 888-1770

Incorporated in Missouri

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number: 43-1039532

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reportsrequired to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theRegistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to suchfiling requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes /X/    No /  /
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes /X/    No /  /
Number of shares outstanding of the only class of Registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, as of July 31, 2003 - 11,734,974.

**LabOne, Inc.

 

Form 10-Q for the Second Quarter, 2003

Table of Contents

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.   Financial Statements:

   Consolidated Balance Sheets

   Consolidated Statements of Operations

   Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity

   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ITEM 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   Selected Financial Data 

   Second Quarter Analysis      

   Year to Date Analysis      

   Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources 

   Critical Accounting Policies      

ITEM 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

ITEM 4.   Controls and Procedures

PART II.   OTHER      INFORMATION

SIGNATURES****
Exhibit 32.1

EVERGREEN ENERGY INC.        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Kevin R. Collins, state and attest that:

|/s/KEVIN R. COLLINSKevin R. Collins
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 21, 2008 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Evergreen Energy Inc. and will be retained by Evergreen Energy Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SmithBarney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/David J. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.Vogel Citigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

January 27,2006

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.8



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To The Board of Directors
Innovative Control Systems, Inc.
112 Meyer Road
Nazareth, Pennsylvania  18064

We have audited the accompanying Balance Sheet of Innovative Control Systems,
Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and the Statements of Operations, Retained
Earnings, Changes in Stockholders' Equity and Cash Flows for the calendar year
then ended.  These Financial Statements are the responsibility of the Company's
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Financial
Statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Innovative Control Systems,
Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and the results of its operations and cash flows
for the period then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.


                                          /s/DANIEL P. IRWIN AND ASSOCIATES P.C.


Strafford-Wayne, Pennsylvania
September 18, 1999