alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Thomas Grant II, certify that: 

1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc.; 

2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors; 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: August 6, 2004
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
W. Thomas Grant II, Chairman of the Board,
**Exhibit      99.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT **

|   | (1) |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | The                information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                issuer                for the fiscal quarter then ended. |
|--------|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                       |                                |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 14, 2007 | MEGA                GROUP, INC.            |
|                            |                                  |                           |
|                                      | By:                              | /s/ JOHN              H. BROWN |
|                                 | **John                H. Brown**           |
|                                 | **Chief                Executive Officer** |

|                                 |                                       |                              |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Date:                August 14, 2007 | By:                              | /s/ JOYCE              BROWN |
|                                 | **Joyce                Brown**             |
|                                 | **Chief                Financial Officer** |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,067
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             336
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,432
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         110,793
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           111,089
<LOANS>                                        645,587
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 801,402
<DEPOSITS>                                     553,186
<SHORT-TERM>                                    76,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,273
<LONG-TERM>                                     81,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 801,402
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 51,411
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,164
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,093
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                58,668
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,332
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,901
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,767
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,001
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,023
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,023
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,539
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   229
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,555
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,833
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,047
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,772
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,772
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 

July 9, 2020 
 Byrne Mulrooney 

c/o Korn Ferry 
 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2600 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 
  

	Re:	 Employment Letter dated as of June 26, 2014 between Korn Ferry (“Korn Ferry”) and Byrne Mulrooney,
as amended by any changes made to certain terms described therein but not documented as formal amendments to the terms thereof (“Employment Letter”) and the Letter Agreement dated as of April 14, 2020 



Dear Byrne: 
 Reference is made to the Letter Agreement, dated
April 14, 2020, between you and Korn Ferry, which amended the applicable terms and conditions of your Employment Letter (the “Employment Letter Amendment”). This letter amends the Employment Letter Amendment by deleting the reference
to “August 31, 2020” and substituting in its stead “December 31, 2020”, having the effect of extending the temporary reduction of your annual rate of base salary described in the Employment Letter Amendment through
December 31, 2020. It is agreed that the extension of the temporary salary reduction above shall not, alone, be a basis for Good Reason or any constructive termination claim and does not constitute Good Reason under your Employment Letter.
Except as expressly modified by this letter, the terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Letter and the Employment Letter Amendment remain in full force and effect and are incorporated herein by reference. 

Please indicate your acceptance of this letter agreement amending your Employment Letter and the Employment Letter Amendment by signing and dating a copy of
this letter agreement in the spaces provided below and returning such signed and dated copy to me. I thank you for your continued commitment to Korn Ferry. 
  

							
		 		 		 	Sincerely,
				
		 		 		 	 /s/ Jonathan Kuai

		 		 		 	Jonathan Kuai

 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: 
  

							
	 /s/ Byrne Mulrooney
	 		 		 	 July 9,
2020                                        


	Byrne Mulrooney	 		 		 	 Date of Signature
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6337

SCOTT STEVEN MERRILL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE HINKLE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-02-772-7)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 24, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Morchower, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jerry Walter

Kilgore, Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Scott Steven Merrill, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition

solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will

not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition

states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and

(2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Merrill has

not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S.

 , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4555]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed:   
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-4555 Filed 2-20-01; 3:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00331

- CR

Jason Neil Kosier , Appellant

v.
The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 23CCR02924 , THE HONORABLE JOHN MICHAEL MISCHTIAN , JUDGE PRESID I NG

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM A jury found a ppellant Jason Neil Kosier guilty of the misdemeanor offense of deadly conduct. Kosier, proceeding pro se , filed a notice of appeal after the jury ’ s verdict but
b efo r e the trial court sentenced him , making his not ice premature

. See Tex. R. App. P. 27.1(b) ( “ In a criminal case, a prematurely filed notice of appeal is effective and deemed fi led on the same day, but after, sentence is imposed or suspended in open court ” but “ is n ot effective if filed before the trial court makes a finding of guilt or receives a jury verdict. ” ) ; Franks v. State , 219 S.W.3d 494 , 497 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2007, pet. ref ’ d) ( “ [ U ] nder Rule 27.1(b), a prematurely filed notice of appeal is one that is filed in the time period after the jury ’ s verdict and before sentence is imposed. ” )

.2 We have now received the clerk ’ s record, which does not contai n a copy of
Kosier ’ s judgment of conviction or the trial court ’ s certification of Kos ier ’ s right to appea l . T he county clerk ’ s office has informed us that it ca nnot provide those documents because
the punish ment hearing , which was originally set for June 5, 2024, has been resched uled for July 24, 2024 , due to Kosier “ fail [ing] to repor t as order ed to a Pre

- S e ntence Investigation
Interview

. ” Without the judgment of conviction and certification of Kosier ’ s right to appeal , w e cannot move forward with the appeal at this time.
T he appropri ate remedy under these circumstances is to abate the appeal pending
the pun ishment hearing and the pron ouncement of Kosier ’ s sentence in the court below

. See
Meachum v. State , 273 S.W.3d 803 , 806 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14 th Dist.] 2008 ) (abatement order). Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings

. A supplemental clerk ’ s record, containing both Kosier ’ s judgment of co nviction

an d the trial court ’ s ce rtification of Kosier ’ s right to appeal, shall be filed in th is Court within ten days after the trial court pronounce s Kosier ’ s se ntence in open court

. The appeal will be
reinstated after the supplemental clerk ’ s rec ord i s filed

.

B efo re Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
Abated and R emanded
Filed : Ju ly 11, 2024
Do Not Publ ish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                             894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,742<F1> 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       459
<INVENTORY>                                    122,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,170
<PP&E>                                          30,654<F2> 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,514
<SALES>                                        323,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               323,300
<CGS>                                          228,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,256<F3> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,566
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
<FN>
<F1>Amount represents receivables net of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Amount represents PP&E net of accumulated depreciation.
<F3>Amount represents SG&A of $70,261 and expenses related to integrating E&B 
Marine of $2,995.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Kentucky USA Energy, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Charles M. Stivers, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Charles
      M. StiversName:
                  Charles
      M. StiversTitle:
                  Interim
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                  March
      16, 2009
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Gregory M. Krzemien, the Chief Financial Officer of Mace Security International,
      Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      that the Form 10-K of Mace Security International, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the “December 31, 2005 Form 10-K”), which this certification
      accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information
      contained in the December 31, 2005 Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mace Security
      International, Inc.




Dated:
              July 13,
              2006/s/ Gregory
              M. KrzemienGregory
              M. Krzemien




* A
      signed
      original of this written statement as required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1309-1310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-817]


Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico: Extension of Time Limit 
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 8, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phyllis Hall at (202) 482-1398 or Dena 
Aliadinov at (202) 482-2667, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Statutory Time Limits

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') to 
make a preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of 
the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested, and 
a final determination within 120 days after the date on which the 
preliminary determination is published. However, if it is not

[[Page 1310]]

practicable to complete the review within these time periods, section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit 
for the preliminary determination to a maximum of 365 days and for the 
final determination to 180 days (or 300 days if the Department does not 
extend the time limit for the preliminary determination) from the date 
of publication of the preliminary determination.

Background

    On August 31,1999, Tubos de Acero de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. 
(``TAMSA'') and Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (``Hylsa'') requested that the 
Department conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on oil country tubular goods (``OCTG'') from Mexico. The 
Department initiated this review on September 24, 1999. See 64 FR 53318 
(October 1, 1999). On September 12, 2000, the Department published the 
preliminary results of the review in the Federal Register (65 FR 
54998). The final results are due no later than January 10, 2001.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review

    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the final 
results of this review within the original time limits mandated by 
section 751 (a)(3)(A) of the Act. The Department is therefore extending 
the time limit for completion of the final results until no later than 
March 12, 2001. See Decision Memorandum from Richard Weible to Joseph 
A. Spetrini, dated December 29, 2000, which is on file in the Central 
Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main Commerce building.
    This extension of the time limit is in accordance with section 751 
(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: December 29, 2000.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 01-453 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# NRSCOMB