alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 23.3

|MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
|---------------------------
|MINE ENGINEERING SERVICES  

CONSENT OF MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LTD.

The undersigned does hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Crystallex International
Corporation, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, of references to and summaries of the report, Technical Report
Update on the Las Cristinas Project, Bolivar State, Venezuela, dated November 7,
2007 (the "Incorporated Information") included in the Annual Information Form of
Crystallex International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
"AIF").

The undersigned does hereby confirm that he has read the AIF
and the AIF fairly and accurately represents the Incorporated Information, and
the AIF does not materially misrepresent, by omission or otherwise, any of the
Incorporated Information.

The undersigned does also hereby consent to the incorporation
  by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-1 (No. 333-08878), on
  Form F-3 (Nos. 333-125380, 333-101583 and 333-91402) and on Form S-8 (No, 333-126128)
  of Crystallex International Corporation of the Incorporated Information.

Dated this  31st day of March, 2010.

| | MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LTD. |                                 
| | -------------------------------- | --------------------------------
| |                                  |                                 
| |                                  | /s/ Steven Ristorcelli          
| |                                  | Name: Steve Ristorcelli (P.Geo.)
| |                                  | Title:                          
| |                                  |                                 
| |                                  | /s/ Thomas L. Dyer              
| |                                  | Thomas L. Dyer (P.Eng,)         
| |                                  | Title:                          





---
<PAGE>   1






                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.01




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
of Alumax Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-83006, 33-83008, 33-83010 and
33-86338) of our report dated January 27, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Alumax
Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995, 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Atlanta, Georgia
February 10, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

THE DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER 

NETWORK, MAYA VAN ROSSUM, THE 

DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER, THOMAS 

CASEY, AND ERIC GROTE,

Petitioners

v.

SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 204 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1936 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1936

   To make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1993 for the 
    general business guaranteed loans program of the Small Business 
                            Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1993

Mrs. Meyers of Kansas (for herself, Mr. Talent, Mr. Zeliff, Mr. Tucker, 
   Mr. Klink, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Machtley, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. 
    Dickey, Mr. Collins of Georgia, and Mr. Skelton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1993 for the 
    general business guaranteed loans program of the Small Business 
                            Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Administration 
Supplemental Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1993''.

SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS.

    The following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to provide supplemental 
appropriations for fiscal year 1993, namely:

                     Small Business Administration

                     business loans program account

    For an additional amount for the ``Business loans program account'' 
for the cost (as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget Act 
of 1974) of guaranteed loans authorized by section 7(a) of the Small 
Business Act, $140,883,000, to remain available until expended. Not 
more than $2,000,000 of such amount may be made available for 
administrative expenses of the guaranteed loans program and may be 
transferred to and merged with appropriations made available under 
Public Law 102-395 for ``Small Business Administration--Salaries and 
expenses''.

                                 <all>
```
[No. 57401-9-I.

Division One.

August 20, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Edward Kyzar, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 05-1-00650-6, Gerald L. Knight, J., entered November 18, 2005. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, J., concurred in by Schindler, A.C.J., and Becker, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      794
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   147
<PP&E>                                             336
<DEPRECIATION>                                     164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,290
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            84
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,925
<SALES>                                         14,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,907
<CGS>                                           13,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,671)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,971)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,971)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement Nos.    33-72086,33-86040,333-05643,333-56215,333-42708,333-101037,333-107317,    and    333-119262    on    Forms S-8    of our reports dated March 28, 2006, relating to the    financial statements of The Talbots, Inc. and subsidiaries and    management’s report on the effectiveness of internal    control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report    on    Form 10-K    of The Talbots, Inc. for the year ended January 28, 2006.     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP     Boston, Massachusetts    March 28, 2006
[No. 34591-9-II.

Division Two.

August 21, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eric V. Trent, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 05-1-00173-7, Michael J. Sullivan, J., entered March 15, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Hunt, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gerald S. Blaskie
                                        Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer of
                                        Superconductive Components, Inc.
                                        May 8, 2006
Overview

The Highly Fractionated Indian Land Loan Program 

(HFIL) provides a way for tribes and tribal members to 

obtain loans to purchase fractionated land interests 

through intermediary lenders.

Fractionation occurs because reservation land was 

divided and allotted to individual tribal members 

through the General Allotment Act of 1887 (also called 

the Dawes Act). Since that time, in each generation 

when an allottee died without a will, the land was not 

divided and parceled among heirs, but instead title 

ownership for the single parcel was divided among 

many owners. This means the same parcel of land once 

owned by a single person could now be owned by up 

to hundreds, even thousands, of individuals with each

inheriting an undivided interest in the land. The 

number of owners grows exponentially through each 

generation, resulting in highly fractionated ownership 

of many allotments of Indian land, and the problem 

continues to grow.

The ability of the owners to use land decreases as 

fractionation increases, sometimes to the point where it 

is nearly impossible to locate the owners or for the 

known owners to coordinate the use of the property.

This program seeks to alleviate this by providing a 

way to consolidate the fractionated interests.

Eligibility Requirements For An 

Intermediary Lender

To be eligible for HFIL, an intermediary lender may be 

a bank, credit union or other financial or tribal 

institution approved by the Farm Service Agency 

(FSA) to participate in HFIL. Intermediary lenders 

must have:

FACT SHEET

August 2019

Farm Service Agency

Highly Fractionated

Indian Land Loan Program

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

• Knowledge and familiarity of working with Indian

 Country and experience working with Bureau of

 Indian Affairs;

• Legal authority necessary for carrying out the

 proposed loan purposes and for obtaining, giving

 security for and repaying the proposed loan; and

• An adequate assurance of repayment of the loan

 based on the fiscal and managerial capabilities of the

 proposed intermediary lender.

Eligibility Requirements For An 

Ultimate Recipient

An ultimate recipient is a Native American tribe, tribal 

entity, or a member of either that receives a loan from 

an intermediary lender’s HFIL revolving fund. To 

receive a loan from the intermediary, they must:

• Comply with highly erodible land conservation and

 wetland conservation requirements on all their land;

• Agree to continue to use the land for agricultural

 purposes during the term of the loan;

• Agree to comply with the requirements of the

 intermediary lender;

• Funds may be used to pay costs incidental to land

 acquisition, including, but not limited to, title

 clearance, legal services, archeological or land

 surveys, and loan closing;

• May be used to pay for costs of an appraisal

 conducted for this loan; and

• Be able to purchase fractionated interests resulting in

 at least 51 percent ownership.

More Information

For more information, visit fsa.usda.gov/farmloans

or farmers.gov. Find your local USDA Service 

Center at farmers.gov/service-locator.
Order entered July 13, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00300
- CV LYNNE DUGGAN, Appellant

V. TANGLEWOOD VILLA OWN ERS ASSOCIATION, INC . , ET AL., A ppellees

O n Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015
- 1
- 091CV



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s July 6, 2016 “Partial Objection to Order Granted June 14, 2016 and Motion to Extend Time to File a Brief.” Appella nt contends the record is incomplete because it is missing the reporter’s records from hearing s conducted on January 12, 2016 and February 9, 2016. Both of these reporter’s record s have been filed with this Court. Appellant also contends the original peti tion in the clerk’s record is incomplete because it is only three pages and the petition she filed was 12 pages. We GRANT appellant’s motion only to the following extent : We ORDER Wilma Bush, Grayson County Clerk, to file , by JULY 25, 2016 either (1) a s upplemental clerk’s record containing the appellant’s twelve page Original Petition for Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction or (2) written verification that the three page Original Petition for Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Inj unctionwas the complete document filed by appellant. W e extend the time for appellant to file a brief to

AUGUST 24, 2016

. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Bush, counsel for appellees, and appellant.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Hart,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:
August 8, 2008





/s/ John R.
Hart


John R.
Hart


President
and Chief Executive Officer
Student Handout- Module Number Five (5) - Processing Authorities 

Processing Authorities 

Processing authorities are defined in 9 CFR 431.1 

They include a person or persons: 

- having expert knowledge of thermal process or acidification requirements 

- having access to facilities for making thermal process determinations 

- designated by the processor to perform certain functions 

- can be employee of firm 

- can be outside person or organization 

FSIS does not publish a list of processing authorities; recognizes the work, not the person 

performing the work and is familiar with individuals and organizations performing this type of 

work. 

Processing Authorities do: 

1. Processing authorities perform temperature distribution tests using detailed protocols. 

2. Processing authorities do heat penetration tests using detailed protocols, calculate 

processes, and recommend process schedules 

3. Processing authorities evaluate process deviations using established protocols and 

provide product dispositions 

Page 1
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2389

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that future increases

in the monthly amount paid by the State of New York to blind disabled

veterans shall be excluded from the determination of annual income

for purposes of payment of pension by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. WALSH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that

future increases in the monthly amount paid by the

State of New York to blind disabled veterans shall be

excluded from the determination of annual income for

purposes of payment of pension by the Secretary of

Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2389 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS FROM IN2 COME DETERMINATION FOR PENSION PUR3 POSES.

4 Section 1503 of title 38, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of para7 graph (9);

8 (2) by striking out the period at the end of

9 paragraph (10) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

10 and

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new

12 paragraph:

13 ‘‘(11) amounts equal to amounts paid to a vet14 eran by the State of New York under a program of

15 that State to make monthly payments to qualifying

16 veterans who are blind and totally disabled, but only

17 to the extent that such amounts are attributable to

18 any increase in the monthly amount of such pay19 ments that is provided after the date of the enact20 ment of this paragraph.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Arizona Land Income Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R. Hislop, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas R. HislopThomas R. HislopChief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerArizona Land Income Corporation


August 14, 2007
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. |   | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. |   | The                      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                      material                      respects, the financial condition and results of operations                      of the                      Company. |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Alexander                    Gordon Jardin                                                                       |   |   |   |
| Alexander                      Gordon JardinChief                      Executive OfficerMay                      15, 2007 |   |   |        |

----