alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ChasePackaging Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuantto Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| November 13,  2008 | /s/ Allen T.  McInnes                           |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Allen T. McInnes                                |
|                    | Chairman of the  Board, President and Treasurer |
|                    | (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |

 

----
Audio Slide Text Slide Graphic 

PHIS: Import/Export PHIS: Import/Export Standard Blue Background 

The Public Health Information System 

(PHIS) will improve how FSIS operates 

here at home and across the world. This 

automated and efficient system will help 

to ensure the safety of imported and 

exported products. 

The Public Health Information System 

(PHIS) will improve how FSIS operates 

here at home and across the world. This 

automated and efficient system will help 

to ensure the safety of imported and 

exported products. 

Standard Blue Background 

Import Inspection Import Inspection Standard Blue Background 

From the Navigation Panel, import 

inspection personnel can view, read or 

add new import applications. 

PHIS allows for a web-based creation and 

update of import application, data 

collection of applicant/broker, consignee 

and importer of record. 

This screen shows the reason for refusal 

of a type of inspection (TOI) and the 

application, which can be sent to the 

applicant for comments or further 

action. 

Export Export Standard Blue Background 

The application for export certificate will 

be viewable on the homepage. 

PHIS will allow for approval or denial of 

an export certificate and a history check 

of previous submittals. 

Here, the electronic generated pledge 

number that is recognized as the 

“electronic signature” is illustrated. The 

pledge allows FSIS employees to release 

an electronic export certificate. 
For more information on PHIS, go to FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT: Standard Blue Background 

www.fsis.usda.gov/PHIS. Thank you for www.fsis.usda.gov/PHIS. 

watching PHIS: Import/Export.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-134623, 333-134559, 333-108023,
333-75862, 333-64943, 333-32186 and 333-123152) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-155352, 333-148455,
333-148454, 333-136937, 333-118065, 333-106388, 333-101908, 333-99739, 333-65385, 333-65383,
333-60168, 333-60152, 333-54140, 333-49522, 333-32178, 333-25707, 333-124210, 333-126225 and
333-132248) of Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statements schedule and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP Boston, Massachusetts
February 27, 2009


---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 29, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 29, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0025. PIERRE R. CAZEAU et al. v. IH2 PROPERTY GEORGIA, L.P. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2013CV2274
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

EDWARD MCCAIN, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:09-cr-00296-DCN-2; 2:21-cv-01777-

DCN) 

Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Edward McCain, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7018 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Edward McCain seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McCain has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7018 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2Cronos Global Income Fund XVRule 13a-14 Certifications     I, John Kallas, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cronos Global Income Fund XV (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Partnership’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 16, 2007     /s/ JOHN KALLAS John Kallas  Chief Financial Officer of CCC
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of Richman TaxCredit
      Properties Inc., general partner ofRichman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., generalpartner
      of the RegistrantFebruary
      10, 2010
SCHEDULE O Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership OMB No. 1545-1668

(Form 8865)

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

Name of transferor Identifying number

(b)

Number of

items

transferred

Type of

property

(a)

Date of

transfer

(d)

Cost or other

basis

(e)

Section 704(c)

allocation

method

(c)

Fair market

value on date

of transfer

Marketable

securities

Inventory

Tangible

property

used in trade

or business

Intangible

property

Other

property

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25909U Schedule O (Form 8865) 2000

Transfers Reportable Under Section 6038B

(f)

Gain

recognized on

transfer

(g)

Percentage interest

in partnership after

transfer

Name of foreign partnership

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions):

(c)

Date of

disposition

(a)

Type of

property

(b)

Date of

original

transfer

(e)

Gain

recognized by

partnership

(f)

Depreciation

recapture

recognized

by partnership

(d)

Manner of

disposition

Dispositions Reportable Under Section 6038B

(g)

Gain allocated

to partner

(h)

Depreciation

recapture allocated

to partner

(under section 6038B)

Is any transfer reported on this schedule subject to gain recognition under section 904(f)(3) or

section 904(f)(5)(F)?  Yes No

Part III

Part I

Part II

Cash

2000
Motion GRANTED AND Order filed September 15 , 2020

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00577

- CV

____________ IN RE FLUID POWER EQUIPMENT, INC., PEERLESS ENTERPRISES, AND ROBERT N. SHELL , Relator s

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 157th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 67171



### ORDER

On August 20, 2020 , relator s Fluid Power Equipment, Inc., Peerless Enterprises, and Robert N. Shell filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.
Relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Tanya Garrison, presiding judge of the 157th District Court of Harris County , to vacate her June 25, 2020 order2 granting the m otion to e nforce j udgment of the r eal party

- in

- interest , Deborah P. Wilson, as Independent Executrix for the Estate of John W. Wilson

. On September 14, 2020 , relators filed a motion for temporary relief, asking

our court to stay a turnover order that Respondent signed on September 3, 2020 , which requires relators to convey title and possession of certain real property (the “turnover order”) . Relators also ask us to stay all execution, attachment and collection proceedings relating to the property pending a decision on the petition
for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P

. 52.8(b), 52.10.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator s’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relator s will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s
motion for temporary relief and issue the following order:

We ORDER the turnover order and al l execution, attachment and collection proceedings relating to the property that is the subject of the turnover order
STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator s’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher , Jewell, and Zimmerer.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-42,820-09
EX P ARTE SE AN EVON WILLIAMS, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 42,724-D IN THE 27TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM BELL COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of attempted capital murder and sentenc ed to forty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant did not file a direc t appea l. A pplicant filed this a

pplication for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. After a revie w of the rec ord, we find that Applicant’s claim that he is not rec eiving all of the time cre dit he is entitled to on his s entenc e is without merit. There fore , we de ny relief
. Applicant’s rema ining claims challeng ing his conviction on the g rounds of trial court err or, unlawful c umulation order, a nd structura l error s are dismiss ed pursua nt to T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O . Art. 11.07 §4.2

Filed: January

13, 2021 Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7522

KENNETH GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TYRONE SUBER; WILLIAM R. DAVIS; CHARLES H. MCLENDON; EDWARD PORCHER; GEORGE MARTIN; WILLIAM D. CATOE; MICHAEL W. MOORE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-560-0-20-BD) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Green, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Green’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Green that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Green failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Green has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Back to Contents

Exhibit 12.2

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Borden D. Rosiak, the Chief Financial Officer of Crystallex International Corporation (the “registrant”), certify that:

1.   Based on my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A-No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2002 (“Form 20-F”), of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information contained in Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Date: October 14, 2004

/s/ Borden D. Rosiak                    Borden D. RosiakChief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crystallex International Corporation and will be retained by such corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

77

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10793

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WESLEY MICHAEL WOODYARD,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-156-1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wesley Michael 

Woodyard has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Woodyard has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 17, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10793 Document: 00514433076 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2018
No. 17-10793

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-10793 Document: 00514433076 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
KILLAM GROUP INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 3,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                                  1,293
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          16,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,076
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       43,082
<PP&E>                                                 16,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         87,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  14,997
<BONDS>                                                   743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    3
<OTHER-SE>                                             69,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           87,422
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       18,603
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          13,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       15,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (13,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (527)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (13,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (13,405)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.53)


</TABLE>
#### Susan GADDY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America; Consolidated Planning, Incorporated, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-1966.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 18, 2011.

Susan Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Farrar, Smith, Moore, Leatherwood, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina; Forrest Stephen Latta, Burr & Forman, LLP, Mobile, Alabama; Gray Thomas Culbreath, Robert F. Goings, Collins & Lacy, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Susan Gaddy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gaddy v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,*No. 6:09-cv-00837-HMH, 2010 WL 2926577 (D.S.C. July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*