alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Forest Service 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

WILDFIRE CRISIS 

Trough the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Congress appropriated $1.4 billion to start putting our Wildfre Crisis Strategy into action with 

investments on 10 landscapes in 8 Western States. Trough work on these landscapes, as well as ongoing Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration 

Program, Joint Chiefs’ Landscape Restoration Partnership, and regularly appropriated hazardous fuels reduction projects, we completed treatments on 

3.2 million acres. 

With additional funding under the Infation Reduction Act of 2022, we selected 11 more landscapes in 69 of the 250 fresheds identifed in the Wildfre 

Crisis Strategy that are in need of immediate work. 

We listened to our employees, our partners, and Tribes on what mattered most to them, where opportunity exists, and where challenges remain. Teir 

feedback and our experience on these landscapes helped us identify both challenges to implementation and conditions that can lead to future success. 

New Round of Investments State FY 2023 Funding* Estimated Acres 

Treated in FY 2023* 

San Carlos Apache Tribal Forest Protection AZ $32,009,200 2,417 

Plumas Community Protection CA $273,930,000 74,000 

Southern California Fireshed Risk Reduction Strategy CA $10,000,000 5,000 

Trinity Forest Health and Fire-Resilient Rural Communities CA $15,899,900 6,855 

Nez Perce-Clearwater-Lower Salmon ID $34,000,000 5,000 

Mount Hood Forest Health and Fire-Resilient Communities OR $4,500,000 4,400 

Klamath River Basin CA & OR $35,400,000 52,080 

Sierra and Elko Fronts NV & CA $57,375,000 22,000 

Pine Valley UT $6,915,000 6,554 

Wasatch UT $18,250,000 14,200 

Colville Northeast Washington Vision WA $2,160,000 2,000 

Total $490,439,100 194,506

Initial Landscape Investments State FY 2023 Funding* Estimated Acres 

Treated in FY 2023* 

4FRI AZ $111,150,312 198,102 

Prescott AZ $13,908,216 12,829 

North Yuba CA $153,153,000 11,250 

Stanislaus CA $21,082,500 23,200 

Colorado Front Range CO $36,905,208 16,091 

Southwest Idaho ID $32,376,000 38,100 

Kootenai Complex MT $8,255,800 8,169 

Enchanted Circle NM $9,644,296 8,497 

Central Oregon OR $13,157,706 23,800 

Central Washington Initiative WA $39,910,598 22,700 

Total $439,543,636 362,738

*Numbers and acres subject to technical adjustments. 
LANDSCAPES 

NEW LANDSCAPES 

EXISTING LANDSCAPES 

HIGH-RISK FIRESHEDS 

ALL LAND OWNERSHIPS 

FOREST SERVICE LANDS 

The QR code will direct you to the digital Press Kit for photos, graphics, and more information at 

https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/wildfre-crisis/press-kit. 

For additional media queries, please contact our National Press Desk at SM.FS.pressoffce@usda.gov. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
#### SAMUEL B. FULLER *v.*MARIGRACE R. FULLER

*George J. Markley,*in support of the petition.

*William F. Gallagher,*in opposition.

Decided April 21, 2010

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 105 (AC 29601), is denied.
946 A.2d 92

#### Joseph PILCHESKY, Appellant v. Edward RENDELL, Governor; State Senator Robert Mellow, Democratic Caucus Leader, Representative WM. Deweese, House Majority Leader; PA. State Senate President Pro Tempore, Joseph Scarnati; House of Representatives Speaker of The House, Dennis O’Brien; City Counsel of the City of Scranton; Mayor Chris Doherty of City of Scranton; The University of Scranton, Inc., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 30, 2008.

*474
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
947 A.2d 713

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Craig Scott JAROWECKI, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 5, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

> ■Whether the grading of the child pornography convictions at Counts 2 through 8 in a multiple counts complaint can be enhanced as a result of a child pornography conviction on Count 1?
H. R. 2139

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and Records

Commission for fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Section 2504(f)(1) of title 44, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking out ‘‘and’’ after the

semicolon;

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking out the period and

inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: ‘‘(D) $6,000,000 for fiscal year 1994;

‘‘(E) $7,000,000 for fiscal year 1995;

‘‘(F) $8,000,000 for fiscal year 1996; and

‘‘(G) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1997.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4478]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 8, 2001.
    A.Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Pat Allen McClary, Sr., Pat Allen McClary, Jr., Imogene McClary, 
Diane McNealy McClary, all of Jellico, Tennessee, Donna McNealy 
McClary, Franklin, Tennessee, Diane McClary Brock, Lafayette, Georgia; 
to acquire additional voting shares of Union Bancshares of Campbell 
County, Inc., Jellico, Tennessee, and thereby indirectly acquire 
additional voting shares of Union Bank, Jellico, Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 16, 
2001.
Jennifer J. Johnson
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-4478 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE & TIME: 

Tuesday, January 9, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE & TIME: 

Thursday, January 11, 2001 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (ninth floor).

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Advisory Opinion 2000-27: United Citizens Party of South Carolina by Michael Avey, Vice Chairman.

Final Audit Report on Schumer '98.

Administrative Matters.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-394  Filed 1-2-01; 3:30 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia

JERRY WAYNE SCHEIB MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0962-96-2 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JANUARY 28, 1997 SARA SUE SCHEIB

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY William R. Shelton, Judge Charles E. Powers (Edward D. Barnes; Edward D. Barnes & Associates, P.C., on briefs), for appellant. Richard L. Locke (Mezzullo & McCandlish, on brief), for appellee.

Jerry Wayne Scheib (husband) appeals an order entered in the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County commanding his extradition from Tennessee due to his failure to pay child support, pursuant to Code § 20-84. He contends that the circuit court did not have the authority to order his extradition under this statute section. We agree, and we reverse. The parties are fully conversant with the record in the cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. Husband lives in Tennessee, and has lived there continuously since before his divorce from Sara Sue Scheib (wife). After the

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - divorce, wife filed a Motion to Show Cause in the circuit court alleging that husband had failed to comply with various provisions of the final divorce decree, including failure to pay support. The judge found husband in contempt. 1 Husband did not appear at the hearing to determine sanctions for the contempt, and the judge issued a capias, stating that the case was a proper one for extradition under Code § 20-84. Section 20-84 provides for the extradition of persons who leave the Commonwealth with the intention of abandoning or deserting a spouse or children or failing to support them. It is contained in Chapter 5 of Title 20 of the Code. "Proceedings under this chapter shall be had in the juvenile and domestic relations district courts . . . ." Code § 20-67. The proceeding in this case was before the circuit court, not the juvenile and

domestic relations court. Because the circuit court did not have the authority to order extradition, that part of the order is

reversed. If the parties choose to pursue the matter further, the juvenile and domestic relations court must determine whether the case is indeed a proper one for extradition under Code § 20-84.

Reversed and dismissed.

1 For the purposes of this opinion, we assume without deciding that this is a criminal punishment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,573
<SECURITIES>                                    12,465
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (319)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,868<F1>
<PP&E>                                          37,175<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,490)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,294
<BONDS>                                          2,437<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,651
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,556)<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,826
<SALES>                                          9,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,908<F6>
<CGS>                                            6,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,381<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    174
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS ON UNCOMPLETED
CONTRACTS OF $6,088 AND RELATED PARTY RECEIVABLE AND OTHER OF $552.
<F2>INCLUDES PORTABLE SIMULATION THEATERS OF $12,262 AND FILM INVENTORY OF $14,713.
<F3>INCLUDES PORTABLE SIMULATION THEATERS OF $3,437 AND FILM INVENTORY OF $11,557.
<F4>INCLUDES THE NON-CURRENT PORTIONS OF CAPITAL LEASES.
<F5>ACCUMULATED DEFICIT.
<F6>INCLUDES INTEREST INCOME OF $314.
<F7>CONSISTS OF SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES OF $3,202 AND RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT OF $179.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
2009-1587.

#### State v. Hicks.

Montgomery App. No. 22786, 2009-Ohio-2740. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                           3,992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                       211
<INVENTORY>                                     46,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,587
<PP&E>                                          89,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                8
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,882
<SALES>                                        115,878
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,878
<CGS>                                           78,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,219)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,163)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6741** 
DWIGHT SULLIVAN, a/k/a Dwight F. Sullivan, a/k/a Dwight Fitzgerald Sullivan , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden of McCormick & Perry Correctional Institutions , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 00876

- TMC )

Submitted : September 23, 2014 Decided: October 3, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dwight Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant At torney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dwight Fitzgerald Sullivan seeks to appeal the district court’s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate ju dge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition , and denying his motion to reconsider . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonabl e jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on pr ocedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed t he record and conclude that Sullivan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Alfred Donnie MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROAD RIVER CORR. INSTITUTION; Major Sharon Sutton; PVT Jones; Inmate Richard M. Kough, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-6121.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 23, 2014.

Alfred Donnie Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jocelyn Newman, Richardson, Plowden & Robinson, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Donnie Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Martin v. Broad River Corr. Inst.,*No. 2:13-cv-01510-TMC (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2013; Jan. *21717, 2014). We deny Martin’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 99.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ David Salzman
---------------------------
by: David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
general partner of the Company
February 13, 2003