alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000830260
<NAME>                        Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         9263
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  70336
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2070)
<INVENTORY>                                    117213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207643
<PP&E>                                         856812
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (263920)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 860842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134751
<BONDS>                                        228250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       258
<OTHER-SE>                                     336700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   860842
<SALES>                                        326688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               326688
<CGS>                                          308436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  308436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8443)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13775)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.52)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
      (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
      general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.






/s/
      Neal
      Ludeke





Neal
      Ludeke


Chief
      Financial Officer of Richman Tax


Credit
      Properties Inc., general partner of


Richman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., general


partner
      of the Registrant


March
      28,
      2008
1 The HONORABLE HOWARD F. SACHS, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3292

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Daniel F. Ward, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 2003 Filed: January 22, 2003

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Daniel Ward pleaded guilty to health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347 and 2. After increasing Ward’s base offense level for abusing a position of public or private trust, the district court 1 imposed a sentence of 5 months imprisonment and 5 months home detention, 3 years supervised release, and restitution of $49,944.01. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in applying the abuse-of-trust increase.-2- The district court did not err. Ward occupied a position of trust--which he abused--with respect to Medicare, because he was able to defraud Medicare by certifying that in his professional judgment treatment was medically necessary and had been provided. SeeU.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, comment. (n.1); United States v. Hodge , 259 F.3d 549, 556-57 (6th Cir. 2001); United States v. Hoogenboom , 209 F.3d 665, 671 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Rutgard , 116 F.3d 1270, 1293 (9th Cir. 1997). Further, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,087,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,592,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,338,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,133,106
<PP&E>                                       9,295,680
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,357,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,910,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,594,885
<BONDS>                                      1,024,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,339
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,613,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,910,227
<SALES>                                     78,463,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            78,463,517
<CGS>                                       49,227,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,227,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            32,208,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,354,485
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             336,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,563,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   546,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,109,948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,109,948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                        242,701
<SECURITIES>                                   72,372
<RECEIVABLES>                                  57,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              141,815
<PP&E>                                        814,952
<DEPRECIATION>                               (154,145)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                809,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,991,474
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   301,700
<COMMON>                                      925,533
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,628,795)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  809,822
<SALES>                                       191,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              665,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (473,751)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (473,751)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>                     
<CIK>                         0000830159
<NAME>                        ATCP 1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Sep-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         360
<SECURITIES>                                   3,244
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          43
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,001
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,532)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


        

</TABLE>
#### Russell FORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie THOMAS, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-12677

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 13, 2011.

Raymond J. Hawthorne, Law Office of Raymond J. Hawthorne, Montgomery, AL, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Yvonne A.H. Saxon, Troy King, Alabama Attorney General, Montgomery, AL, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Russell Ford, a Florida state prisoner proceeding through counsel, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition as time-barred. Ford filed a notice of appeal, and the district court granted him a certificate of appealability (COA) as to whether he had “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right with respect to his claims related to newly discovered evidence and alleged destruction of evidence.” Ford contends Alabama’s post-conviction relief procedures are “fundamentally inadequate to vindicate [his] substantive rights” because the district attorney destroyed evidence, in bad faith and in violation of the Due Process Clause, which could have substantiated his claim of actual innocence.

A federal habeas petitioner must obtain a COA from the district court to appeal the denial of his § 2254 habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). However, “[w]hen a district court dismisses a petition as time-barred, it is inappropriate to grant a COA on the [underlying] constitutional claim.... ” *Ross v. Moore,*246 F.3d 1299, 1300 (11th Cir.2001).1

In light of the district court’s untimeliness ruling, it was inappropriate to grant a COA on the issue of whether Ford had “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right with respect to his claims related to newly discovered evidence and alleged destruction of evidence.” Accordingly, we vacate the order granting a COA and remand to the district court for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether Ford’s § 2254 petition is time-barred.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

1

. In *Ross*we vacated the order granting a COA and remanded to the district court "for the limited purpose of considering whether a COA should be granted on the question of whether appellant's habeas petition is time-barred.” *Id.*
An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

**Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS** A **lock** ( Lock           A locked padlock           ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

**

Farm Service Agency

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

                      - About FSA
                      - Ask USDA
                      - Contact Us
                      - Forms

- Home
- Programs & Services  - ARC/PLC Program
- Civil Rights
- Certified Mediation Program
- Climate Adaptation Plan
- Conservation Programs
- Cooperative Agreements
- Dairy Margin Coverage Program
- Disaster Assistance Programs
- Economic & Policy Analysis
- Emergency Relief
- Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance 
- Farm Bill Home
- Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
- Farm Loan Programs
- Financial Management Information
- Increasing Land Access
- Initiatives
- Laws and Regulations
- Margin Protection Program for Dairy
- Market Facilitation Program
- MIDAS
- Organic Certification Cost Share Program
- Outreach & Education
- Payment Eligibility
- Price Support
- Rice Production Program

- State Offices
- Online Services  - LDP
- eARC/PLC
- Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
- FSA Online Data Resources
- Loan Assistance Tool

- Newsroom  - Fact Sheets
- News Releases
- Emergency Designations
- Stakeholder Information
- eFOIA
- Meetings & Events
- Public Service Announcements
- County Committee Elections
- Fence Post

# Hawaii State Events

- Section Topics
- Hawaii & Pacific Basin Home
- Programs
- Newsletters
- State Events
- State Office Staff
- State Service Centers
- State News Releases
- Resources

- County Offices
- Hawaii County Offices
- Guam County Offices
- American Samoa County Offices

#### State Executive Director

Joy Kono
Read Joy Kono'

####  State Office Address

Room 5-108

(808) 541-2600 ext. 2

## 2023 Calendar of Events

See the Hawaii Department of Agriculture Events Calendar for more Agriculture related events.

- Home
- Programs & Services
- State Offices
- Online Services
- Newsroom

- Farmers.gov
- USA.gov
- USDA.gov
- Whitehouse.gov

- Accessibility Statement
- Common Questions
- Freedom of Information Act

- No FEAR Report
- Information Quality
- Non-Discrimination Statement

- Policies and Links
- Privacy Policy
- Sitemap

#### Sign up for updates

**

Farm Service Agency

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

Twitter

RSS
Exhibit
      32.1









**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Credit Management Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Alexander Gordon Jardin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.










U /s/
      Alexander Gordon Jardin


Alexander
      Gordon Jardin


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      14, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                         Percent       State of
                                                                                           of        Incorporation
                   Parent                                   Subsidiary                  Ownership   or Organization
                   ------                                   ----------                  ---------   ---------------
<S>                                         <C>                                           <S>          <S>          
WesterFed Financial Corporation              Western Federal Savings Bank of Montana      100%         Federal
Western Federal Savings Bank of Montana      Monte Mac I                                  100%         Montana
Western Federal Savings Bank of Montana      S.F.S. Industries, Inc.                      100%         Montana
Western Federal Savings Bank of Montana      Service Corporation of Montana               100%         Montana
Western Federal Savings Bank of Montana      WesterFed Insurance Services, Inc.           100%         Montana

</TABLE>
#### Myrtle CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATOR, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-2284.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.

Decided: March 3, 2009.

Myrtle Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey M. Cook, Office of the Bankruptcy Administrator, Raleigh, North Carolina; Marjorie Keys Lynch, Office of the Bankruptcy Administrator, Wilson, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. •

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Myrtle Cross appeals the district court’s order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying her motion to reopen a Chapter 11 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Cross v. Bankruptcy Adm’r,*No. 5:08-cv-258-BO, 2008 WL 4831438 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                       9,429,227
<SECURITIES>                                17,507,282
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,633,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,295,951
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,558,617
<PP&E>                                       3,695,345
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,830,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,606,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,603,631
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,580
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,322,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,606,477
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,182,411
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,260,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,737
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               213,375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (327,566)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,653,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,653,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,653,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>