alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2174

JIN BIN CHEN, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-993-955) Submitted: May 4, 2005 Decided: May 20, 2005 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas B. Payne, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. McConnell, Deputy Director, Kurt B. Larson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jin Bin Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) order denying his motion for reconsideration of the Board’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. It is undisputed that Chen’s motion to reopen was untimely. See8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2) (2004). However, under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004), the Board has authority to reopen or reconsider a case in which it issued a final decision on its own motion at any time. Chen seeks review of the Board’s decision declining to sua sponte exercise its authority under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004) to reopen or reconsider his case. We find that this court is without jurisdiction to review this claim. See Belay-Gebru v. INS , 327 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir. 2003); Calle-Vujiles v. Ashcroft , 320 F.3d 472, 474-75 (3d Cir. 2003); Ekimian v. INS , 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002); Luis v. INS , 196 F.3d 36, 40-41 (1st Cir. 1999); Heckler v. Chaney , 470 U.S. 821, 831-33 (1985). We also note that Chen’s attacks to the underlying decision of the immigration judge, as affirmed by the Board without opinion, are not properly before the court because he did not file a timely petition for review of the Board’s decision. See 8 U.S.C.- 3 - § 1252(b)(1) (2000); Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995) (noting the time limit is “mandatory and jurisdictional”). Accordingly, we deny Chen’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
H. R. 2411

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

For the relief of Leteane Clement Monatsi.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR LETEANE CLEMENT

MONATSI.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Leteane Clement Monatsi shall be classified

as a child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act for purposes of approval of a relative visa petition

filed under section 204 of such Act by his adoptive parent and

the filing of an application for an immigrant visa or adjustment

of status.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Leteane Clement Monatsi

enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in

subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained

lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment

of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality

Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for

adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees within 2 years

after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to Leteane Clement Monatsi, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer

to reduce by 1, for the current or next following fiscal year, the

worldwide level of family-sponsored immigrants under section

201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

(e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION TREATMENT FOR

CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural parents, brothers, and sisters

of Leteane Clement Monatsi shall not, by virtue of such relationship,
H. R. 2411—2

be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration

and Nationality Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-186823) and related Prospectus of Enersis S.A. of our reportsdated April 2, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Enersis S.A. and subsidiaries, included in this AnnualReport (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2013. 

/s/ Ernst & Young Ltda. 

Ernst & Young Servicios Profesionales de Auditoría y Asesorías Limitada 

Santiago, Chile 

April 3, 2014
Schedule B (Form 941):

Report of Tax Liability for Semiweekly Schedule Depositors

(Rev. January 2014) Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service

960311

OMB No. 1545-0029

 

Employer identification number 

(EIN) —

Name (not your trade name)

Calendar year (Also check quarter)

Report for this Quarter... 

(Check one.)

1: January, February, March

2: April, May, June

3: July, August, September

4: October, November, December

Use this schedule to show your TAX LIABILITY for the quarter; DO NOT use it to show your deposits. When you file this form with Form 941 or 

Form 941-SS, DO NOT change your tax liability by adjustments reported on any Forms 941-X or 944-X. You must fill out this form and attach it 

to Form 941 or Form 941-SS if you are a semiweekly schedule depositor or became one because your accumulated tax liability on any day 

was $100,000 or more. Write your daily tax liability on the numbered space that corresponds to the date wages were paid. See Section 11 in 

Pub. 15 (Circular E), Employer’s Tax Guide, for details.

Month 1

1 .

2 .

3 .

4 .

5 .

6 .

7 .

8 .

9 .

10 .

11 .

12 .

13 .

14 .

15 .

16 .

17 .

18 .

19 .

20 .

21 .

22 .

23 .

24 .

25 .

26 .

27 .

28 .

29 .

30 .

31 .

Tax liability for Month 1

.

Month 2

1 .

2 .

3 .

4 .

5 .

6 .

7 .

8 .

9 .

10 .

11 .

12 .

13 .

14 .

15 .

16 .

17 .

18 .

19 .

20 .

21 .

22 .

23 .

24 .

25 .

26 .

27 .

28 .

29 .

30 .

31 .

Tax liability for Month 2

.

Month 3

1 .

2 .

3 .

4 .

5 .

6 .

7 .

8 .

9 .

10 .

11 .

12 .

13 .

14 .

15 .

16 .

17 .

18 .

19 .

20 .

21 .

22 .

23 .

24 .

25 .

26 .

27 .

28 .

29 .

30 .

31 .

Tax liability for Month 3

.

Total must equal line 10 on Form 941 or Form 941-SS. 

Fill in your total liability for the quarter (Month 1 + Month 2 + Month 3) ▶

Total liability for the quarter

. For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. IRS.gov/form941 Cat. No. 11967Q Schedule B (Form 941) (Rev. 1-2014)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2470 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2470

 To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to permit 
 the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to reduce the maximum 
monthly rents in effect for certain projects receiving assistance under 
such section to eliminate material differences in the rents charged for 
        similar assisted and unassisted units in the same area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 1993

 Mr. Thomas of California (for himself and Mr. Dooley) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to permit 
 the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to reduce the maximum 
monthly rents in effect for certain projects receiving assistance under 
such section to eliminate material differences in the rents charged for 
        similar assisted and unassisted units in the same area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 8(c)(2)(C) 
of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(c)(2)(C)) is 
amended by striking ``The Secretary may not reduce'' and all that 
follows through ``periodic payments of the owner.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2551 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2551

   To authorize the award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal to any 
member of the Armed Forces who was assigned to duty outside the United 
States during the Persian Gulf War with a unit that actively engaged in 
                   combat operations during that war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1993

Mrs. Meyers of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal to any 
member of the Armed Forces who was assigned to duty outside the United 
States during the Persian Gulf War with a unit that actively engaged in 
                   combat operations during that war.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOUTHWEST ASIA SERVICE MEDAL.

    The Secretary of Defense shall provide that eligibility for the 
Southwest Asia Service Medal shall be extended to any member of the 
Armed Forces who was assigned to duty outside the United States with a 
unit that actively engaged in combat operations in the Persian Gulf War 
during the period beginning on January 16, 1991, and ending on March 3, 
1991.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the inclusion in this
Annual Report on Form 40-F of our report dated March 31, 2008, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Crystallex International Corporation (the "Company")
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, which appears in Exhibit 1.2 of
this Annual Report on Form 40-F.





We also consent to the incorporation by
reference into the registration statements on Forms F-1 (No. 333-08878), F-3
(Nos. 333-125380, 333-101583 and 333-91402) and S-8 (No. 333-126128) that have
been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of our report dated March
31, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
    LLPToronto,
      Canada
            PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLPMarch
      31, 2008
            Independent
      Registered Chartered Accountants
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 19
- 00624
- CR
JOE R. RIOS A/K/A ROMAN JOE RIOS A/K/A ROMAN RIOS A/K/A JOE ROMAN RIOS A/K/A ROMAN J. RIOS v. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. B
- 19
- 2 117
- 0
- CR
- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFI ED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 30, 2022
EXHIBIT 10.1



HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INC.
Karen J. Weiner
Vice President & Assistant General Counsel
Global Development Center
Route 202-206, P.O. Box 6800
Bridgewater, NJ  08807-0800


March 31, 1997

Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.
25 John Road
Canton, MA 02021

Attention: Kenneth Larsen, Chairman


     This will confirm the terms as between Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc. 
("Copley") and Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. ("HMRI"), of Copley's employment 
of Ken E. Starkweather as Vice President - Finance and Treasurer. Mr. 
Starkweather is a longterm HMRI employee who HMRI agreed to ask to move to 
Copley to assist Copley after its former CFO resigned. When Mr. Starkweather 
was hired by Copley, he did not receive any incentives from Copley. He did not 
negotiate an employment agreement with Copley as the other Senior executives 
of Copley have. Mr. Starkweather has received no stock options from Copley and 
will receive none. Since he has no employment agreement, Mr. Starkweather is 
entitled to no severance from Copley.

     1.  Mr. Starkweather remains an employee of HMRI for payroll purposes.


     2.  Mr. Starkweather will receive raises and bonuses in accordance with 
         the system in place at HMRI at the time. Copley will provide 
         performance appraisal input concerning Mr. Starkweather to HMRI. HMRI 
         will notify Copley of any changes in Mr. Starkweather's compensation 
         and bonuses.

     3.  Copley will reimburse HMRI for Mr. Starkweather's salary and related 
         benefits and payroll taxes.

     4.  Copley will reimburse HMRI for Mr. Starkweather's bonuses. Any bonus 
         that Mr. Starkweather earned before his arrival at Copley will be 
         paid by HMRI and not reimbursed by Copley.

     5.  Any severance benefits to which Mr. Starkweather may be entitled are 
         the obligation of HMRI and not reimbursable by Copley.

     6.  Mr. Starkweather will not be eligible for any benefits, compensation, 
         or stock based awards that Copley may offer its employees.

     7.  Copley has, or will, reimburse HMRI for the costs associated with Mr. 
         Starkweather's relocation to the Canton, Massachusetts area.

     8.  Copley will pay directly to Mr. Starkweather the travel and 
         entertainment expenses he incurs while employed by Copley .

     If this accurately reflects our agreement, please sign in the space 
provided and return one copy of this letter to me.



Sincerely,


/s/ Karen J. Weiner

Karen J. Weiner
Vice President & Assistant General Counsel


                                                   Agreed:

                                                   Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.

                                                   By:  /s/ Kenneth M. Larsen
                                                       -----------------------
                                                      Kenneth Larsen, Chairman

                                                   Date:  4/10/97
                                                        ----------------------
**
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION
**

Washington, D.C. 20549

**
FORM 10-Q
**

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
Commission file number: 0-16946
**LabOne, Inc.

10101 Renner Blvd.

Lenexa, Kansas 66219

(913) 888-1770

Incorporated in Missouri

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number: 43-1039532

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reportsrequired to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theRegistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to suchfiling requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes /X/    No /  /
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes /X/    No /  /
Number of shares outstanding of the only class of Registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, as of October 31, 2002 - 11,328,219.

**LabOne, Inc.

 

Form 10-Q for the First Quarter, 2003

Table of Contents

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.   Financial Statements:

   Consolidated Balance Sheets

   Consolidated Statements of Operations

   Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity

   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ITEM 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   Selected Financial Data 

   First Quarter Analysis      

   Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources 

   Critical Accounting Policies      

ITEM 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

ITEM 4.   Controls and Procedures

PART II.   OTHER      INFORMATION

SIGNATURES

CERTIFICATIONS****
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ David Salzman
-----------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
general partner of the Company
August 13, 2002
#### Sukhpal Singh BAINS; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75463.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.*

Filed Feb. 27, 2007.

Hector M. Roman, Jr., Esq., Roman & Singh, LLP, Jackson Heights, NY, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, John P. Fonte, Esq., Robert B. Nicholson, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division-Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sukhpal Singh Bains and his wife, Gurjinder Bains, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the agency’s adverse credibility determination for substantial evidence, *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Bains was credible. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003) (an adverse credibility determination should be upheld unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion). Accordingly, Bains is not entitled to asylum or withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Case No. DA 23-0716

RODNEY BRANDT and HEIDI 

BRANDT, MARSHALL FLADAGER and 

NEVA FLADAGER, and LARRY 

LAUTARET and RENA LAUTARET,

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/

Appellees/Cross-Appellants,

-vsR&R MOUNTAIN ESCAPES, LLC, a 

Montana Limited Liability Company,

Defendant/Counterclaimant/

Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

ORDER GRANTING THIRD

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION TO FILE 

OPENING BRIEF

Appellant R&R Mountain Escapes, LLC (“Appellant”) has filed an

Unopposed Motion for Extension to File Opening Brief. Appellant’s counsel has 

represented to the Court that she has contacted counsel for Appellees and CrossAppellants, Rodney Brandt, Heidi Brandt, Marshall Fladager, Neva Fladager, Larry 

Lautaret, and Rena Lautaret, and they do not object to this Motion. 

For good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s Motion for Extension to File its Opening 

Brief is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant shall have up to and including 

May 8, 2024, to file its opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2024

03/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0716
EX-10.10





 Exhibit 10.10 

 
 



 
 September 14, 2017 

Nasym Afsari 
 General Counsel 

Re: Executive Compensation Package Update 
 Dear Nasym:

 The board of directors (the “Board”) of Montrose Environmental Group, Inc (the “Company”) has approved an update to your executive
compensation package which was previously summarized for you in a letter dated June 23, 2016 (“Original Letter”). The Board has authorized the change set forth below to the terms of your Original Letter: 

IPO/Change in Control Cash Bonus Amount: $1,000,000 shall be payable to you in cash upon the occurrence of a change in control or effectiveness of an
Initial Public Offering of the Company. A change in control shall be defined as set forth in the Company’s equity incentive plan. 
 All other terms of
your Original Letter remain in effect and unchanged as of the date hereof. 
 We look forward to your continued success with Montrose. 

Regards, 
  
 



 
 Vijay Manthripragada 
 Chief
Executive Officer 
 Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 
  

			
	 Global Headquarters    

1 Park Plaza
 Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92614
	 	  T: 949.988.3500
  F: 949.988.3514

 info@montrose-env.com

 www.montrose-env.com