alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Use este anexo para mostrar su obligación contributiva para el trimestre: por favor, NO LO USE para mostrar sus depósitos de contribución.

Debe llenar esta planilla y adjuntarla a la Forma 941-PR si usted es un(a) depositante de itinerario bisemanal o si su obligación contributiva

acumulada en cualquier día asciende a $100,000 ó más. Escriba sus obligaciones contributivas en el espacio numerado que corresponda a la

fecha en la cual se pagaron los salarios. Vea el apartado 11 de la Publicación 179 (Circular PR) para más detalles.

16

Registro de la Obligación Contributiva para los Depositantes de Itinerario Bisemanal

Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue Service

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Obligación contributiva

para el Mes 1

Para el Aviso sobre la Ley de Reducción de Trámites, vea las

instrucciones por separado.

Cat. No. 12465Z Anexo B (Forma 941-PR) (Rev. 1-2005)

Obligación total para el 

trimestre

Escriba el total de su obligación contributiva para el trimestre (Mes 1 +

Mes 2 + Mes 3) = Total de su obligación contributiva para el trimestre

(Ese total debe = la línea 8 de la Forma 941-PR)



9

10

11

12

13

14

15

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

Mes 1

Obligación contributiva

para el Mes 2

Obligación contributiva

para el Mes 3

. .

.

.

.

OMB No. 1545-0029

Informe para este trimestre...

(Marque uno.)

1: enero, febrero, marzo

2: abril, mayo, junio

3: julio, agosto, septiembre

4: octubre, noviembre, diciembre

Anexo B (Forma 941-PR):

Mes 2

Mes 3

Número de identificación

del patrono

Nombre (el de usted, no

el de su negocio)

—

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

16

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

16

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

(Rev. enero del 2005)
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-04489, 33-93788, 333-14749 and 333-61797)
and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-45929 and 333-109383) of SOLA International Inc.
of our report dated June 22, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
June 23, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1929

VERONICA W. OGUNSULA,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual 

capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice 

(DOJ); JAMES B. COMEY, in his individual capacity as 

Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC; 

THOMAS E. PEREZ, individually and as former Assistant 

Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, DOJ; H. MARSHALL 

JARRETT, individual and as former Director, U.S. Attorney’s 

Office, (DOJ); MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, individually and in his 

capacity as the Inspector General (DOJ); JOSEPH S. 

CAMPBELL, in his individual capacity as Deputy Assistant 

Director, Criminal Investigative Division, FBI; SANDRA A. 

BUNGO, in her individual capacity as Unit Chief, Initial 

Processing Unit, Internal Investigations Section, 

Inspective Division, FBI; MR. ROD ROSENSTEIN, individually, 

U.S. Attorney for Maryland; BRYAN E. FOREMAN, individually 

and his official capacity as the former Assistant U.S. 

Attorney; THOMAS COYLE, individually and in his official 

capacity as an Agent, FBI,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. 

(8:15-cv-01297-GJH)

Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Veronica W. Ogunsula, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Veronica W. Ogunsula appeals the district court’s order 

denying her emergency motion for an order to vacate and rescind 

eviction and dismissing her civil complaint in part without 

prejudice and in part with prejudice. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Ogunsula v. Holder, 

No. 8:15-cv-01297-GJH (D. Md. filed June 22 & entered June 23, 

2015). We deny Ogunsula’s motions for a temporary restraining 

order, stay pending appeal, emergency relief, and to expedite 

the decision, and all other pending motions, with the exception 

of Ogunsula’s motion to seal her motion to expedite. We grant 

the motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33670]


The Indiana Rail Road Company--Operation Exemption--Monon Rail 
Preservation Corporation

    The Indiana Rail Road Company (INRD), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to operate 
the property of the Monon Rail Preservation Corporation, consisting of 
a line between milepost Q217.67, at Hunters, and milepost Q213.41, at 
Ellettsville, a distance of 4.26 miles in Monroe County, IN.
    Because INRD's projected annual revenues will exceed $5 million, 
INRD has certified to the Board on December 26, 2000, that the required 
notice of the transaction was posted at the workplace of the employees 
on the affected line on December 20, 2000. See 49 CFR 1150.42(e). 
According to INRD's certification, the employees on the affected line 
are not represented by a labor organization and therefore no notice to 
labor organizations was required. INRD stated in its verified notice 
that the transaction will become effective on the date of the Board's 
approval of INRD's operation of the line. The earliest the transaction 
can be consummated is February 24, 2001 (60 days after INRD's 
certification to the Board that it had complied with the Board's rule 
at 49 CFR 1150.42(e)).
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33670, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on John Broadley, Esq., John H. Broadley & Associates, 1054 31st 
Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20007.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
    Decided: February 14, 2001.

Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4390 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q/A for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                                    /s/ William J. Ryan
                                                    ---------------------
                                             Name:  William J. Ryan
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 6, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Banknorth Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Banknorth Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7522

KENNETH GREEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TYRONE SUBER; WILLIAM R. DAVIS; CHARLES H.

MCLENDON; EDWARD PORCHER; GEORGE MARTIN;

WILLIAM D. CATOE; MICHAEL W. MOORE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-560-0-20-BD)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Green, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Green’s case was referred to

a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994).

The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Green that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation

could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon

the recommendation. Despite this warning, Green failed to object

to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Green has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fidelity Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report), I, Raymond S. Stolarczyk, chief executive
officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.


/s/ RAYMOND S. STOLARCZYK
-------------------------

Raymond S. Stolarczyk
Chief Executive Officer
December 30, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4649-N-04]


Announcement of OMB Approval Number for Youthbuild Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD

ACTION: Announcement of OMB Approval Number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the OMB approval 
number for the collection of information pertaining to Rural Housing 
and Economic Development Program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Phyllis Williams, Department of 
Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW. Washington, DC 
20410, telephone (202) 708-3484. This is not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended), this notice advises 
that OMB has responded to the Department's request for approval of the 
information collection pertaining to Youthbuild Program. The OMB 
approval number for this information collection is 2506-0142, which 
expires on September 30, 2003.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
Donna M. Abbenante,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4785 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
SCHEDULE O Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership OMB No. 1545-1668

(Form 8865)

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

Name of transferor Filer’s identifying number

(b)

Number of

items

transferred

Type of

property

(a)

Date of

transfer

(d)

Cost or other

basis

(e)

Section 704(c)

allocation

method

(c)

Fair market

value on date

of transfer

Marketable

securities

Inventory

Tangible

property

used in trade

or business

Intangible

property

Other

property

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25909U Schedule O (Form 8865) 2003

Transfers Reportable Under Section 6038B

(f)

Gain

recognized on

transfer

(g)

Percentage interest

in partnership after

transfer

Name of foreign partnership

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions):

(c)

Date of

disposition

(a)

Type of

property

(b)

Date of

original

transfer

(e)

Gain

recognized by

partnership

(f)

Depreciation

recapture

recognized

by partnership

(d)

Manner of

disposition

Dispositions Reportable Under Section 6038B

(g)

Gain allocated

to partner

(h)

Depreciation

recapture allocated

to partner

(under section 6038B)

Is any transfer reported on this schedule subject to gain recognition under section 904(f)(3) or

section 904(f)(5)(F)?  Yes No

Part III

Part I

Part II

Cash

2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q OF ALUMAX INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              27
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      462
<ALLOWANCES>                                        18
<INVENTORY>                                        543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,109
<PP&E>                                           3,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              399
<BONDS>                                            650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,320
<SALES>                                          1,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,433
<CGS>                                            1,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (2)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    104
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 63
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        63
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12


</TABLE>
[No. 34949-3-II.

Division Two.

August 7, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Keith Edward Berry, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 05-1-02697-1, Frank E. Cuthbertson, J., entered June 2, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Van Deren, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
2009-1385.

#### FirstEnergy Corp. v. Cleveland.

Cuyahoga App. No. 91624, 182 Ohio App.3d 357, 2009-Ohio-2257.
Exhibit 10.8


 


		50
                                         Tice Boulevard





Suite A26





Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677





(201) 645-4765 (tel)

  
	 	 















 


June 25, 2020


 


Michael Derby


 


Subject: Derby Employment Offer


 


Dear Michael,


 


On behalf of PaxMedica, Inc. (“PaxMedica”
or the “Company”), I am pleased to extend to you an offer of employment for the role of Executive Chairman of
the Board of Directors. This position will be located at PaxMedica’s current headquarters at 50 Tice Boulevard, Suite A26,
Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677. You will report to the Company’s Board of Directors. Your start date will be mutually determined,
but I anticipate it to be on or around July 1, 2020. I am excited about the possibility of you joining the team and your
helping to build our high value neurodevelopmental biopharma company.


 


The terms of your employment offer are outlined below:


 


		·	Part-time employment,
                                         up to 20 hours per week, as required.






		·	Initial monthly
                                         base pay of $27,083.33, which, when annualized, is equivalent to $325,000 per year.






		·	Participation
                                         (pro-rated for 2020) in a Performance Bonus Plan with a target of 50% of your base salary,
                                         based on company and individual achievement. Your bonus will be based on your performance
                                         meeting mutually established individual goals and objectives to support the growth strategy
                                         of the Company as well as the Company’s overall performance. Upon early termination
                                         of your employment without cause, the maximum accrued but unpaid bonus (through the date
                                         of termination) will be paid out promptly.






		·	Your agreement
                                         not to compete with the Company in any capacity on any product candidate or product in
                                         the field of neurodevelopment, so long as you are employed by the Company.



 


This offer of employment pursuant to the above terms shall
remain in effect for two years from your start date, with automatic one-year renewals, unless terminated sooner either by you
or the Company.


 


Confidential






     1


     


    

 


If you understand and accept these terms, please sign and return
one copy of this offer letter to me.





 


I would love to have you join the PaxMedica team and be a part
of building a great company. Should you have any questions regarding this offer, please feel free to contact me at: .


 


 





	Sincerely,	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Howard Weisman	 	 	 	 
	Howard Weisman	 	 	 	 
	Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 
	PaxMedica, Inc.	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed to and Accepted
    by:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Michael Derby	 	 	June 25,
                                         2020	 
	Michael Derby	 	 	Date	 





 


Confidential






     2
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R.
Hart, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:
November 5, 2008





/s/ John R.
Hart


John R.
Hart


President
and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1969** 

THE COUNTY OF GRAYSON, VIRGINIA; RICHARD VAUGHN, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Grayson County; THE COUNTY OF CARROLL, VIRGINIA , Plaintiffs

– Appellants ,

v.

JOHN T. SPANE; DALE W. SUTPHIN , Defendants

– Appellees , and

RA

- TECH SERVICES, INC. , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. ( 7:13

- cv
- 00384

- GEC )

Submitted : June 19, 2015 Decided: July 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Cullen Dennis Seltzer, SANDS ANDERSON PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. Gregory D. Habeeb, Monica Taylor Monday,2 Daniel R. Sullivan, GENTRY, LOCKE, RAKES & MOORE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee John T. Spane

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court ’ s order dismissing
their fraud in the inducement claims against John T. Spane and
Dale W. Sutphin . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Cnty. Of Grayson v. Spane , No.

7:13

- cv
- 00384

- GEC (W.D. Va. May 29 , 2014) . We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED