alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 


Share Certificate


 


	Number of certificate



	 	Number of shares











 





	 	 	 



 


CN ENERGY GROUP. INC.


 


COMPANY
NUMBER [NUMBER]


 


This is to certify that [Name]
of [Address] is the registered holder of [Number] [Share Class] shares of [Value] each being [partly paid to the extent of [amount
in words][amount in numerals] per share]]/[fully paid][and numbered [number]] in the above-named company, subject to the memorandum
and articles of association of the company.


 


[Transfer date]


 


	 	 	 
	Director	 	Director/ Secretary
Plant Management

Appeal Noncompliance Records

Welcome to the Public Health 

Information System. In this 

demonstration, you will learn 

how to appeal noncompliance 

records. I'll guide you through 

the steps of accomplishing this 

task.

First, click My Establishments.
Next, click Select 

Establishments.

Select the desired 

establishment.
Click, Respond to NR.

A list of noncompliance records 

documented by the FSIS 

inspector appears.
Click the red arrow for the NR 

that you would like to respond 

to.

The Plant Management 

Response page appears.
Use the scroll bar to review the 

Description of NonCompliance.

Scroll the page down.
In this scenario, we will appeal 

the FSIS decision. Select Appeal.

You may enter content in the 

text box to support your 

position.
Click, Save.

This saves the information that 

has been entered but does not 

submit the response.
You may optionally add 

attachments to the appeal. Click 

Add Attachment.

Click, Browse.
Your document library appears. 

Select the files you wish to 

attach to the appeal.

Click, Open.
Notice the document file name 

appears next to the Browse 

button.

Add a description in the 

Document Title field.
Click, Upload.

Click, Save.
This saves the information that 

has been entered, but does not 

submit the response.

Click, Submit.
A pop-up box appears. Are you 

sure you want to submit? Click 

OK.

The Submit action has locked 

and submitted the response to 

FSIS. 

This is the end of this exercise. 

You will now be returned to the 

introductory screen. Thanks for 

your interest in the Public Health 

Information System.
EXHIBIT 10.2 AMENDMENT NO. 1 DATED AS OF AUGUST 14, 2006 TO THE EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this Amendment) dated as of August 14, 2006 to the Employment
Agreement dated as of July 01, 2006, by and between Yossi Attia and Euroweb
International Corp. (the "Company") and/or its subsidiary.

WHEREAS:

The parties wish to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement.

Now, therefore, in consideration of and subject to the premises and the mutual
agreements, terms and conditions herein contained, the benefits to be derived
therefrom and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Definitions.

      Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings
      ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement.

2. Term, Title, and Duties

      In addition to the appointment for five years of Yossi Attia as the
      President of Euroweb RE Corp., a subsidiary of the Company ("ERC"), as
      described in the Employment Agreement, the Company enters into a two year
      employment agreement commencing August 14, 2006 with Yossi Attia as Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company.

3. Salary

      Effective August 14, 2006, Yossi Attia shall be paid at the annualized
      salary rate of at least $250,000 to be paid in the form of Company shares
      of common stock. The number of shares to be received by Yossi Attia is
      calculated based on the average closing price 10 days prior to the
      commencement of each employment year. All other compensation terms
      described in the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect in accordance with its terms, including but not limited to, Annual
      and Special Bonuses, Benefits, and Benefits upon Termination.

4. General.

      Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement continues to be, and
      shall remain, in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


                                       1
<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of
the date and year first above written

                                        EUROWEB INTERNATIONAL CORP.


Dated: August 14, 2006                  By  /s/ Moshe J. Schnapp
      -------------------                 ---------------------------------
                                          Moshe J. Schnapp

                                        Its: President


                                        YOSSI ATTIA


Dated: August 14, 2006                  By  /s/ Yossi Attia
      -------------------                 ---------------------------------
                                          Yossi Attia


                                       2
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

February 23, 2015

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, March 5, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *PocahontasCoal Co., LLC. v. Secretary of Labor,*Docket No. WEVA 2014-202-R; and *PocahontasCoal Co., LLC v. Secretary of Labor*, Docket Nos. WEVA 2014-642-R, et al.**(Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judges erred in ruling thatthey lacked jurisdiction to review a Notice of Pattern of Violations and aNotice of Safeguard, respectively.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                EmogeneJohnson

                                                AdministrativeAssistant
941 A.2d 1255

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Michael MASTROMARINO, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Dec. 17, 2007.

*205
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2007, the Commonwealth’s Emergency Petitions filed December 13, 2007, are DENIED and the single-Justice Order entered December 14, 2007, extending the stay is VACATED.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. OSW ALDO ZUNIGA-SANC HEZ, a .k.a . Oswa ldo Sa

nc he z , De fe nda n t-Appe l la

nt. No. 16-30028

D.C . No. 2:09-c r-00023-DW M M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Dona ld W . M olloy , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 14, 2017 * * B e fore : GOODW IN, FARR IS, an d FER NANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Oswa ldo Zuniga -Sanc he z a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r gran ting in pa

rt Zuniga -Sanc he z ’ s m otion for a se nte nc e re duc tion unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED FEB 27 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).The distric t c ourt re duc e d Zuniga -Sanc he z ’ s se n te nc e to 120 m onths, whic h

re fle c t s the m andatory m inim um for his offe nse . Se e 21 U.S.C . § 841(b)(1)(A). Zuniga -Sanc he z c onte nds tha t he is e n title d to a

furthe r re duc tion. W e re vie w de novo a distric t c ourt’ s re fusa l to depa rt be low the m andatory

m inim um . Se e Unite d State s v . Syk e s , 658 F.3d 1140, 1144 (9th C ir. 2011). B e c a use the m andat ory m inim um a pplie s in se c tion 3582(c )(2) proc e e dings, thedistric t c ourt c o rre c tly c onc lude d tha

t it c ould not re duc e Zuniga -Sanc h e z ’ s se nte nc e any furthe r tha

n it did. Se e Syk

e s , 658 F.3d a

t 1148. Zuniga -Sanc he z ’ s c h a lle nge to the distric t c ourt’ s de nia l of sa fe ty va lve re lie f unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3553(f) is not c ogniz a ble in this proc e e ding. Se e Dillon v . Unite d State s , 560 U.S. 817, 831 (2010) (only a spe c ts of the se nte nc e a ffe c t e d by the a m e ndm e nt m ay

be ra ise d in se c tion 3582(c )(2) proc e e dings). AFFIRM E D.

1 6 - 3 0 0 2 8 2
**Exhibit 13.1**

**** 

**906 CERTIFICATION**

**** 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Ignacio Antoñanzas A., the Chief Executive Officer and Alfredo Ergas S., the Chief Financial Officer of ENERSIS S.A., each certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.              the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.              the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Enersis.

 

 

Date: June 11, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

**** 

NY3 - 513208.02

----
#### Isidro Alexander RUBIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MCI-H, 2010 STAFF, et al.; RCI 2012 Staff, et al.; Warden Wayne A. Webb; Chief of Security Ronald B. Brezler; Medical Supervisor Ali Salik; Jackelin Shank, Case Management Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-8040.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

Isidro Alexander Rubio, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Patricia H. Beall, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Isidro Alexander Rubio appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Rubio v. MCI-H,*No. 8:12-cv-03046-RWT, 2013 WL 6211742 (D.Md. Nov. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2507 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2507

    To continue until the close of December 31, 1994, the existing 
 suspension of duties on color couplers and coupler intermediates used 
        in the manufacture of photographic sensitized material.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1993

 Mr. Quillen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To continue until the close of December 31, 1994, the existing 
 suspension of duties on color couplers and coupler intermediates used 
        in the manufacture of photographic sensitized material.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION.

    Headings 9902.29.01 and 9902.37.07 of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States are each amended by striking out 
``12/31/92'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Application.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law to 
the contrary, upon a request filed with the appropriate customs officer 
before the 90th day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any 
entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption--
            (1) which was made after December 31, 1992, and before the 
        15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) with respect to which there would have been no duty if 
        any amendment made by section 1 applied to such entry or 
        withdrawal;
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such amendment applied to 
such entry or withdrawal.

                                 <all>
```
2009-0627.

#### DIRECTV, Inc. v. Levin.

Franklin App. No. 08AP-32, 181 Ohio App.3d 92, 2009-Ohio-636. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint motion to stay briefing,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and the briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of this court.
Exhibit 10.1 - Trust Agreement



Exhibit 10.1



Robert Thast

14708 - 31A Avenue

Surrey, British Columbia

Canada   V4P 2J4


 

August 7, 2006


 

Nova Mining Corporation

1189 Howe Street, Suite 1504

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada   V6Z 2X4


Ladies and Gentlemen:


RE:     Trust Agreement

















Robert Thast holds in trust for Nova Mining Corporation, a 100% undivided interest in the following claim:


	 	 	
Number of 
	
Date of 

	
Tenure No.

	
Document Description

	
Claim Units

	
Expiration


	
521833
	
Columbia VI 
	
14
	
November 2, 2006







Robert Thast will deliver full title on demand to Nova Mining Corporation  for as long as the claims are in good standing with the Province of British Columbia.


 


 
Yours truly,


ROBERT THAST

Robert Thast
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,974
<SECURITIES>                                 9,384
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,806
<INVENTORY>                                 34,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            76,825
<PP&E>                                      37,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             237,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       73,209
<BONDS>                                     29,767
<COMMON>                                     2,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  97,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               237,524
<SALES>                                    140,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           140,524
<CGS>                                       79,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               79,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,408
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 332
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,264)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc. for the period ending Marh 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LabOne, Inc.

 

LabOne, Inc.

Date:  May 9, 2005
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
1The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3548

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Kevin McRay Smith, * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: July 9, 2001 

 Filed: July 16, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kevin McRay Smith appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1

following his guilty plea to drug offenses. The district court sentenced Smith to 188

months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Smith challenges the

district court’s finding that he was a career offender, arguing that his burglaries of

commercial buildings should not be considered crimes of violence under U.S.S.G.

§§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2.
-2-

As Smith concedes, in United States v. Hascall, 76 F.3d 902, 906 (8th Cir.), cert.

denied, 519 U.S. 948 (1996), this court determined that second-degree burglary of a

commercial building is a crime of violence. Smith urges us to find that Hascall was

wrongly decided. Even if we were inclined to do so, we are not at liberty to overturn

the decision; only the court sitting en banc may do so. See United States v. Reynolds,

116 F.3d 328, 329 (8th Cir. 1997) (refusing to consider argument that Hascall was

wrongly decided).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* P ursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40052

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAMAR CAMPBELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:96-CR-22-11

July 15, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lamar Campbell pled guilty to one count of possessing cocaine

base with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1). He has appealed the factual basis for the application

of the sentencing guidelines by the district court, which sentenced

Campbell to 78 months in prison and three years of supervised

release.2

We find no clear error in the district court’s factual

conclusion that the 5.9 grams of crack cocaine and the handgun

found in the attic of the house in which Campbell was arrested were

connected to Campbell’s offense. The circumstances of Campbell’s

arrest made it reasonable for the district court, relying on the

presentence investigation report, to conclude that Campbell could

have reasonably foreseen that his co-conspirators would store crack

cocaine on the premises. S ee U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (1995). He

admitted handling the gun earlier in the day; the court could infer

that it was not “clearly improbable that the weapon was connected

with the offense.” U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 note 3 (1995).

Nor do we find clear error in the district court’s conclusion

that Campbell used marijuana during his pretrial release. Based on

the four positive urine tests and the testimony of Officer Lora

Savoie at a hearing on the government’s motion for detention, the

district court could reasonably conclude that Campbel l’s secondhand smoke explanation was not credible. We give “great deference”

to the district court’s determination that a defendant’s conduct is

inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility. U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1

note 5 (1995).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 13.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the annual report of CE Franklin Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Salvatore Secreti,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


         /s/ Salvatore Secreti
         ---------------------
Name:    Salvatore Secreti
Title:   Vice President and
         Chief Financial Officer

Date:    March 18, 2005