alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,438
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          52,001
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            53,038
<LOANS>                                        123,249
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,991
<DEPOSITS>                                     172,472
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,790
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,966
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 196,991
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,515
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  703
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   121
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,339
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,291
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,291
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,048
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,045
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,045
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.63
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,426
<LOANS-PAST>                                         5
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,881
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       18
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,895
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               349
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,546
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*DRICE PICKEL

*Christopher Y. Duby,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Brenda Hans,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided July 8, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 443 (AC 30558), is denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2049

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit taxpayers to elect

a nonincremental credit for 5 percent of their aerospace-related research

expenditures in lieu of the incremental research credit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 1993

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself and Mrs. KENNELLY) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

taxpayers to elect a nonincremental credit for 5 percent

of their aerospace-related research expenditures in lieu

of the incremental research credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

4 (relating to credit for increasing research activities) is

5 amended by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as sub6 sections (h) and (i), respectively, and by inserting after

7 subsection (f) the following new subsection:
2

•HR 2049 IH

1 ‘‘(g) ELECTIVE NONINCREMENTAL CREDIT FOR

2 AEROSPACE BUSINESSES.—If the taxpayer elects the ben3 efits of this subsection for a taxable year—

4 ‘‘(1) the research credit determined under sub5 section (a) for such taxable year shall include a

6 credit equal to 5 percent of the qualified research

7 expenses of the taxpayer which are attributable to

8 any aerospace-related business (as defined by the

9 Secretary) of the taxpayer, and

10 ‘‘(2) in determining the amount of the credit

11 determined under subsection (a)(1) for such taxable

12 year, the qualified research expenses which are so

13 attributable shall not be taken into account.

14 ‘‘An election under this subsection may only apply to

15 either or both of the taxpayer’s first 2 taxable years begin16 ning after the date of the enactment of this subsection.’’

17 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

18 apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the en19 actment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7331

PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in

his official and individual capacity;

LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and

individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his

official and individual capacity; SERGEANT

DAY, in his official and individual capacity;

CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual

capacity; DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual

capacity and official capacity; LIEUTENANT

YOUNCE,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-7850

PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in

his official and individual capacity;

LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and

individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his

official and individual capacity; SERGEANT

DAY, in his official and individual capacity;
- 2 -

CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual

capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity

and official capacity,

Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(7:06-cv-00185-gec)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter O. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Peter O. Odighizuwa

appeals the district court’s orders denying a preliminary

injunction and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Odighizuwa v. Ray, No. 7:06-cv-00185-gec (W.D. Va.

July 13, 2006; Oct. 24, 2006). We deny Odighizuwa’s motions for

appointment of counsel and for an injunction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2009-1028.

#### Zolotarevsky v. Barnett.

Ashtabula App. No. 2009-A-0017, 2009-Ohio-2086. Discretionary appeal not accepted. Appellant’s motions to verify, for leave to plead, and to submit exhibits denied as moot.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4375]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part E, Chapter E (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), of 
the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority 
for the Department of Health and Human Services (61 FR 15955-58, April 
10, 1996, most recently amended at 66 FR 7653 on January 24, 2001) is 
further amended as follows:
    Under Section E-20. Functions:
    A. Within the statement for the Division of Human Resource 
Management (EAA6):
    1. Delete ``and organization'' in the first sentence;
    2. Insert ``and'' before (3); and
    3. Delete (4) and (5).
    B. Delete the title and statement for the Division of Research 
Synthesis and Translation (EAF4); and
    C. Delete the title and statement for the Division of User Liaison 
(EAF5) and replace with the following:
    Division of User Liaison and Research Translation (EAF5). 
Facilitates the synthesis, translation, and dissemination of existing 
research findings, data and activities--particularly in research areas 
to which AHRQ has made substantial contributions--to selected AHRQ 
stakeholders. Specifically: (1) Coordinates and supports development of 
speeches and other presentations made by the AHRQ Director; (2) 
develops research syntheses focused on issues of importance to health 
systems administrators, large health care purchasers, State and local 
health policymakers, and others interested in health services research; 
(3) plans and conducts workshops and seminars to provide research 
findings and related information to State and local health policymakers 
to allow them to make better informed health care policy decisions; (4) 
drafts articles, briefing sheets, and other analytic documents that 
synthesize and analyze particular topics and issues in health services 
research or pertaining to agency activities; (5) coordinates and 
supports ongoing improvement and maintenance of the Agency's research 
database system; (6) maintains liaison with State and local government 
organizations, public policy organizations, and with the research 
community and receives and appropriately transmits information which 
may impact the Agency's research plan and priority setting process; and 
(7) develops and implements mechanisms to identify and contact 
potential users of research findings and related information.
    These changes are effective upon date of signature.

    Dated: February 12, 2001.
John M. Eisenberg,
Director.
[FR Doc. 01-4375 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2304

To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension of duty on

Quizalofop-ethyl.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension

of duty on Quizalofop-ethyl.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON QUIZALOFOP-ETHYL.

5 Heading 9902.30.58 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

7 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.
2

•HR 2304 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

4 enactment of this Act.

5 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

7 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro8 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

10 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend11 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act;

15 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

16 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

17 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

18 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

19 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                       277
<INVENTORY>                                     64,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,690
<PP&E>                                          89,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                8
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,590
<SALES>                                        159,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,439
<CGS>                                          110,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,103)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.12)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the annual report of Natural Health Trends Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chris T. Sharng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: May 31, 2006 /s/ Chris T. Sharng   Chris T. Sharng   Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT
OF
EXPERT                                                                                                                                                         Exhibit
23.1








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-125362, No. 333-134296, No. 333-141321 and No.
333-147547) and Form S-8 (No. 333-142848) of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) ofthe findings in our reports dated January 2008 and April
2008,  with respect to the Mean Annual Recharge for the Tule Desert
Hydrographic Basin, Lincoln County, Nevada appearing in “Item 2, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under
the caption “Tule Desert Groundwater Basin and Impairment of Water Assets” in
the “Water Resource and Water Storage Operations” section of the Company's
condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We hereby consent to
all references to such reports in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and we
hereby consent to all references to such reports in each such Registration
Statement, and further consent to Daniel B. Stevens and Associates, Inc. being
named as an expert in each such Registration Statement and in each Prospectus to
which any such Registration Statement relates.








Daniel B.
Stephens and Associates, Inc.





/s/
Judith Ann Meeter


Name:
Judith Ann Meeter


Title:
Controller/Secretary




Albuquerque,
NM


May 7,
2009
U.S. flag
						An official website of the
								United States government
							Here's
								how you know
						Here's how you
								knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov**
									website belongs to an official government organization in the
									United States.
						Https**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock**
									( A locked padlock
									) or **https://** means you've safely
									connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only
									on official, secure websites. Skip
				to main content
 usda logousfs shield*Forest Service*
						Caring For the Land and Serving People
					Menu
			close

					Pike-San Isabel National Forests & Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands


						Forest Service Home
							About the Agency

							Contact
									the National Office
							Inside the FS





				Search
 Buckeye Gulch
   Area Status:
 Approximately 2 miles, this road that can be walked, biked or driven. The section of the road that can be driven with a 4WD vehicle begins 4.5 miles north of Leadville on Colorado Hwy 91 and ends on a hiking trail about 1/4 mile before the lake. The first part of this road crosses private land. Please stay on the roadway and be respectful of private property.
  At a Glance Current Conditions:
				Due to snow, this area is only accessible by snowmobile at this time.Busiest Season:
				SummerClosest Towns:
				Buena Vista, CO; Leadville, COInformation Center:
				Leadville Ranger District
 Recreation Map Map showing recreational areas. 
		
			Map Information
 Activities Bicycling Mountain Biking
 Hiking Day Hiking
 Quick Links Responsible Recreation
 								     Link opens in a new window
							
								Recreation Passes
 								     Link opens in a new window
							
								Maps & Publications
 								     Link opens in a new window
  Recreation Areas Find An Area
 Recreation Activities Select an Activity - Select an Activity -
 Go
  Highlights 'Queen of the 14ers'
						       Link opens in a new windowShe is the agency’s Colorado Fourteeners Program manager; others simply refer to her as ‘Queen of the 14ers’.
    Location
 Return to top
	
	**Pike-San Isabel National Forests &
Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands
Forest Supervisor Office**

2840 Kachina Drive
Pueblo, CO 81008
719-553-1400
TTY: 719-553-1404
M-F 7:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.

District Offices - Hours vary
Contact Us   











				Recreation.gov

						askUSDA

						Report Fraud
								on USDA Contracts

						Accessibility Statement

						WhiteHouse.gov

						Policies and Links

						Visit OIG

						Privacy Policy

						eGov

						Our Performance

						Plain Writing

						Non-Discrimination Statement
						
						Anti-Harassment Policy

						No FEAR Act Data
						
						
						Open Government

						Careers

						FOIA
						
						Information Quality

						USA.gov


	usda logousfs shield*Forest Service*
					U.S. Department of Agriculture
Exhibit 10.1
 
 PICO HOLDINGS, INC.
 
 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 Grant of Restricted Stock Awards
 
 
 
 Grantee:___________________
Date:__________________
 
 
 Pursuant to Section 8 of the PICO Holdings, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, (the “LTIP”), the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors have granted you, as part of your Director’s compensation, the following Restricted Stock Award:
 
 Number of Restricted Stock Awards in Grant:
__________________Date of Grant:
__________________Vesting Schedule:
__________________
 
 This award is subject entirely to the terms and provisions of the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
 
 __________________________________
James F. Mosier
General Counsel and Secretary
PICO Holdings, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force Precision Targeting will meet in closed session March 29-30, 2001; April 19-20, 2001; May 10-11, 2001; June 14-15, 2001; and July 26-27, 2001, at SAIC, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201. The Task Force will examine the full range of the precision weapons targeting in tactical military operations, from target execution, location, and identification through mission execution and damage assessment. Target types will include fixed installations and both transportable and mobile military force elements.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. The Task Force will review: All planned precision weapons programs and procurements to determine the degree to which these weapons are compatible with targeting requirements for different target classes; the degree to which existing and planned reconnaissance and surveillance assets are used to effectively develop target sets, real time targeting data and perform battle damage assessment under varied degrees of cover, concealment and deception; our ability to identify and precisely locate targets while minimizing false alarms using automatic target recognition techniques and precision location technologies; and our ability to attack moving targets.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings, concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (1), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: February 16, 2001.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-4482  Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M