alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERICK HERNANDEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

JOE TALAMANTES

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 255

- C V

Appeal from the

171 st District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2014DCV0610 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to com plete

mediation. The Court GRANTS the request to extend the deadline to complete mediation unt il

April 5 , 201 8

. U pon completion of mediation, the parties are direct ed to comply with the

instructions set forth in our order of December 21 , 2017

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5 th day of March , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6663

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-01-240-8-1; CR-01-712)

Submitted: July 23, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004

Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings

Caughman, Mark C. Moore, Beth Drake, Assistant United States

Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra Pendleton,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, in

which Bryson requested to be resentenced. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order denying Bryson’s motion. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RBC Life Sciences, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Clinton H. HowardClinton H. HowardChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 10, 2006
Exhibit 31.2

I, Michael Scarpa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Talbots, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                   |  |                                                               
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 29, 2012
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Michael Scarpa                                            
|                   |  | Michael Scarpa                                                
|                   |  | Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



-57-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 8, 2001.

**A.****Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis**                     (JoAnne F. Lewellen, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

*1.  Rivers Ridge Holding Company,*                     Sartell, Minnesota; to acquire Bank Vista Leasing Company, Sartell, Minnesota, and thereby engage in leasing personal or real property pursuant to § 225.28(b)(3) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 16, 2001.

Jennifer J. Johnson

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-4477 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGER QUINTANILLA-TORRES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71008

Agency No. A095-754-046

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 9, 2013** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Roger Quintanilla-Torres, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”). The BIA dismissed his appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial

of his motion to reopen proceedings after his removal was ordered in absentia. 

FILED

MAR 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 Because the parties are familiar with the facts underlying this appeal, we 1

do not recount the facts here.

2

Where the BIA adopts the IJ's decision and adds its own reasoning, we

review both decisions. Lopez-Cardona v. Holder, 662 F.3d 1110, 1111 (9th Cir.

2011). The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and

questions of law are reviewed de novo. Hamazaspyan v. Holder, 590 F.3d 744,

747 (9th Cir. 2009). Our review of an in absentia removal order is limited to the

validity of the notice provided to the alien, the reasons for the alien’s absence, and

whether the alien is removable. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(D). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition for review. 

1

Quintanilla-Torres failed to challenge the BIA and IJ’s grounds for denying

his motion to reopen. We deem those issues waived. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d

1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011). Quintanilla-Torres’s sole argument on appeal is

that he should be permitted to reopen his case so that he can pursue cancellation of

removal and adjustment of status. However, Roger failed to raise this issue before

either the BIA or the IJ. Because he did not exhaust this claim, we lack jurisdiction

to consider it. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004). 

PETITION DENIED.
Form 8994

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Employer Credit for Paid Family and Medical Leave

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8994 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-2282

2018

Attachment 

Sequence No. 994

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number 

A Do you have a written policy providing for at least 2 weeks of annual paid family and medical leave for your qualifying 

employee(s) to whom wages are paid (prorated for any part-time employees)? See instructions.

Yes. 

No. Stop. Do not file Form 8994 (see instructions for an exception that may apply to a partnership or S corporation).

B Does the written policy provide paid family and medical leave of at least 50% of the wages normally paid to a qualifying 

employee? See instructions.

Yes. 

No. Stop. Do not file Form 8994 (see instructions for an exception that may apply to a partnership or S corporation).

C Did you pay family and medical leave to at least one qualifying employee during the tax year? See instructions.

Yes. 

No. Stop. Do not file Form 8994 (see instructions for an exception that may apply to a partnership or S corporation).

D If you employed at least one qualifying employee who was not covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act, did you include

in your written policy and otherwise comply with “non-interference” language? See instructions.

Yes. 

No. Stop. Do not file Form 8994 (see instructions for an exception that may apply to a partnership or S corporation).

1 Enter the total paid family and medical leave credit figured for wages paid during your tax year 

to your qualifying employee(s) while on family and medical leave (if you use the Paid Family and 

Medical Leave Credit Worksheet, the total from column (d)). See instructions for the adjustment 

you must make to your deduction for salaries and wages . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 Employer credit for paid family and medical leave from partnerships and S corporations (see 

instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 Add lines 1 and 2. Partnerships and S corporations, report this amount on Schedule K. All 

others, report this amount on Form 3800, Part III, line 4j . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 37804G Form 8994 (2018)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-88,159-01 AND WR-88,159-02

EX PARTE PERCY DONNELL WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 27735 A-1 AND 27737 A-1 IN THE 278TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WALKER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of

a building and burglary of a habitation, and he was sentenced to concurrent terms in prison. There

were no direct appeals.

Applicant raises several claims in his habeas applications, including claims of ineffective

assistance of trial counsel, and he has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland

v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.
-2-

1999); Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012); Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012). There is

no response from counsel in the record provided to this Court, and there are no findings from the trial

court. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334

S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective

assistance by explaining counsel’s representation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and

tactical decisions. Counsel shall discuss any plea negotiations and plea offers. To obtain the

response, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If

the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised

in the habeas application. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions

of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus

relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 28, 2018

Do not publish
FSIS OCCUPANT EMERGENCY PLAN

(This form is provided as a suggested guide for inspection workplaces)

DATE

AGENCY

ESTABLISHMENT

ADDRESS

FSIS OFFICIAL-IN-CHARGE (Coordinator) ESTABLISHMENT OWNER/MANAGER TELEPHONE

EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION INFORMATION

(Alternate Coordinator, Wardens, First Aiders)

NAME DUTY NAME DUTY

1.

2.

3.

EMERGENCY PLAN GUIDANCE

Know Evacuation Routes. Know the Plan of Action.

LOCATION OF EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR FIRE, POLICE AND MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

FIRE OR SMOKE BOMB THREAT

1. Sound Building Alarm

2. Call Fire Department

3. Notify Coordinator

4. Notify Establishment Owner

5. Close Windows and Doors in Government Office

6. Evacuate Building

1. Notify Coordinator

2. Establishment Search and Evacuation Procedure:

Yes No

3. If Suspicious Object is Found:

a. Do Not Disturb

b. Notify Bomb Squad

c. Notify Establishment Owner

d. Evacuate Building

EVACUATION ASSEMBLY POINT ALTERNATE FSIS COMMAND SITE

PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO ORDER EVACUATION

(Other than fire, explosion or bomb device) EVACUATION SIGNALS

1. Coordinator

2. Alternate Coordinator

3. Establishment Owner

FIRE EXPLOSION OR GAS LEAK SUSPICIOUS OBJECT

OTHER EMERGENCIES

FSIS FORM 4791-21 (9/90)

TELEPHONE

4.

5.

6.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2419 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2419

 To extend the sales period for the Christopher Columbus Quincentenary 
                                 coin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1993

 Mr. LaFalce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the sales period for the Christopher Columbus Quincentenary 
                                 coin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 405(c) of the Christopher Columbus Quincentenary Coin Act 
(31 U.S.C. 5112 note) is amended by striking out ``June 30, 1993'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``June 30, 1994''.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51205

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESSE TREVINO, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-164-4

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jesse Trevino, Jr., has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Trevino has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Trevino’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to its being 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 22, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-51205 Document: 00512777377 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2014
No. 13-51205

raised on collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th 

Cir. 2014), petition for cert. filed (June 4, 2014) (No. 13-10484). Trevino’s 

motion to withdraw a previously filed brief and to substitute a brief is 

construed as a motion to file a supplemental response to counsel’s Anders

motion, and it is GRANTED. To the extent that Trevino requests leave to 

proceed pro se, the request is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. 

Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Trevino’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-51205 Document: 00512777377 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/22/2014
<TABLE>

                                                    OREGON STEEL MILLS, INC.


                                                                                                   EXHIBIT 11

                                                 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                                                      OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                          (In thousands, except per share data amounts)
<CAPTION>

                                                     Three Months Ended                     Nine Months Ended
                                                        September 30,                         September 30,
                                                  ----------------------                 ----------------------
                                                    1996         1995                      1996         1995
                                                    -----        ----                      ----         ----
<S>                                               <C>          <C>                       <C>          <C>   
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                               25,668       19,422                    21,748       19,417

Common stock equivalents arising
  from 598 shares of stock to be
  issued March 2003                                   598          598                       598          598
                                                  -------      -------                   -------      -------
                                                   26,266       20,020                    22,346       20,015
                                                  =======      =======                   =======      =======
                                                 
Net income                                        $ 6,356      $ 1,966                   $16,997      $ 9,622
                                                  =======      =======                   =======      =======

Primary and fully diluted
  net income per common and
  common equivalent share                            $.24         $.10                      $.76         $.48
                                                     ====         ====                      ====         ====


</TABLE>
52%

48%

Purchase Refinance

August 2016

$46 $274

Billion Billion

YTD 2016

1.03%

3,942

August 2016 Highlights

SF delinquency rate is 90+ days; MF rate is 60+ days 

0.01%
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
        (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
        Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc., general
        partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
        Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Registrant.
  
  /s/
        David
        Salzman
 David
        Salzman
 Chief
        Executive Officer of Richman Tax
 Credit
        Properties Inc., general partner of
 Richman
        Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
 partner
        of the Registrant
 March
        14,
        2008