alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

Quaker City Bancorp, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 33-83770, No.333-91217, No. 333-41891 and No. 333-107115) on Form S-8 of Quaker City Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated July 22, 2003, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Quaker City Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30,2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, which report appears in the June 30, 2003 annualreport on Form 10-K of Quaker City Bancorp, Inc. 

 

/s/KPMG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

September 25, 2003
DENIED and Opinion Filed August 30, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00763-CV 

IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY 

AND LINDSEY NICOLE DESSART, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 6 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 006-03203-2022 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness 

In their August 2, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relators challenge the 

trial court’s denial of relators’ motion for severance and abatement. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate 

remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). After reviewing relators’ petition and the record before us, we conclude 

that relators have failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 
 –2– 

We also lift the stay issued by this Court’s August 22, 2023 Order. 

Garcia, J., would have requested a response. 

230763F.P05 

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE
Back to Contents

Exhibit 12.2

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Borden D. Rosiak, the Chief Financial Officer of Crystallex International Corporation (the “registrant”), certify that:

1.   Based on my knowledge, the AnnualReport on Form 20-F/A-No. 2 for the year ended December 31, 2002 (“Form 20-F”), of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information contained in Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Date: October 21, 2004

/s/ Borden D. Rosiak                    Borden D. RosiakChief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crystallex International Corporation and will be retained by such corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

77

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ELVIS JHUNE QUERO L TUB ON, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-71181 Age n c y No. A075-118-892 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2014 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, SILVER M AN, a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Elvis Jhune

Que rol Tubon, a

native and c itiz e n of the Philippine s, pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have 

# FIL ED JAN 23 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, a pply ing the sta

nda rds gove rning a d

ve rse c re dibility de te rm i nations c re ate d

by the REAL ID Ac t, Shre

stha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd we de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility de t e rm ination ba se d on the om ission of Tubon’ s politic a l a c tivitie s from his a sy lum

a pplic ation and writte n sta

te m e nt. Se e K

in v . Holde r , 595 F.3d 1050, 1057 (9th C ir. 2010) (signific ant om issions from a sy lum a pplic ations c an be substa

ntia l e vide nc e in support of a

n a dve rse c re dibility

de te rm ination). Tubon’ s e xpla nat ions for the om i ssion do not c o m

pe l a c ontra ry re sult. Se eLata v . IN

S, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th C ir. 2000). In thea

bse nc e of c re dible te stim ony , Tubon’ s a sy l um and withholding of rem o v a l c la im s fa il. Se eFarah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th C ir. 2003). Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e a lso supports the a g e nc y ’ s de nia l of C AT. Se e Silay a v . Muk

ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008) (de ny ing C A T re lie f be c a use pe t itione r fa ile d to de m onstra te tha t “ m ore like ly

tha n not, shewill be torture d at the instiga

tion of, or with the

a c quie sc e nc e of the Philippine gove rnm e nt” ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.
1 2 - 7 1 1 8 1 2
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of United Investors Income Properties (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 13, 2007
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 13, 2007





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Zacarias MEDINA REYNA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74250.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*605Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

Deniz S. Arik, Stender & Pope, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Melissa Neiman-Kelting, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

We have reviewed respondent’s motion to dismiss in part and for summary affirmance in part, petitioners’ opposition and the record, and we conclude that petitioners, Zacarías Medina Reyna ([ AXX-XXX-XXX ]) and Maria del Socorro Reynafa ([ AXX-XXX-XXX ]) have failed to raise a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that alien could not, simply by recasting a traditional abuse-of-discretion challenge as a due process violation, create “colorable” constitutional claim sufficient to invoke court of appeals’ jurisdiction). Accordingly, respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction as to Zacarias Medina Reyna ([ AXX-XXX-XXX ]) and Maria del Socorro Reynafa ([ AXX-XXXX-XXX ]) is granted. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); *Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft,*277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

*606A qualifying relative is a necessary prerequisite to qualification for cancellation of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). Respondent’s motion for summary disposition as to petitioner Sheila Gisel Medina Reynaga ([ AXX-XXXXXX ]) is granted because petitioner lacks a qualifying relative. Accordingly, the petition for review is denied as to Sheila Gisel Medina Reynaga ([ AXX-XXX-XXX ]). *See Munoz v. Ashcroft,*339 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2003).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 23.4**

**CONSENT**

     I consent    to the use of the disclosure or use of written information that the undersigned    provided to Crystallex International Corporation (the “Corporation”)    relating to the Tomi Mining Operation situate in Bolivar State, Venezuela,    in any filing that the Corporation has made or will hereafter make with the    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933,    as amended. I also consent to the use of my name under the heading “Experts” in    any such filings.

| Date: March 29, 2006 | Dr. Richard Spencer, P.Geo      |
|----------------------|---------------------------------|
|                 |                            |
|                 | /s/ Dr. Richard Spencer, P. Geo |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Collegiate Pacific Inc.
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ William R. EstillWilliam R. Estill
#### JOHNSON v. McDONALD et al.

No. 21895.

Dec. 18, 1934.

W. W. Pryor and Hugh M. Sandlin, for plaintiff in error.

W. T. Anglin and Alfred Stevenson, for defendants in error.

ANDREWS, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants to recover a judgment for an alleged balance on a promissory note. The defense was misrepresentation and fraud in the inducement leading up to the execution thereof, The cause was tried to the court. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed.

The questions presented to this court for determination are: Was fraud sufficiently alleged and proven, and was there a sufficient restoration or offer to restore? Those were questions of fact upon which the court passed, and there being competent evidence *118reasonably tending to sustain tbe judgment of tbe trial court in a law action tried without a jury, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

RILEY, C. J., and SWINDALL, McNEILL, OSBORN, andJBAYLESS, JJ., concur. CULLISON, Y. O. J., and BUSBY and WELCH, JJ., absent.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2559 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2559

 To designate the Federal building located at 601 East 12th Street in 
  Kansas City, Missouri, as the ``Richard Bolling Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1993

  Mr. Wheat introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 601 East 12th Street in 
  Kansas City, Missouri, as the ``Richard Bolling Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 601 East 12th Street in Kansas 
City, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ``Richard Bolling 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard Bolling 
Federal Building''.

                                 <all>
```
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

May 31, 2000



Willowbridge Associates Inc.
101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180
Plainsboro, N.J. 08536

Attention:  Ms. Theresa C. Morris

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Ms. Morris:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management  Agreements through June 30, 2001and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

                       Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P. II
                       Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
                       Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
                       BBK Global  Futures Fund

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the  attention of Mr. Daniel  Dantuono at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer








AGREED AND ACCEPTED

WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, INC.




DAD/sr
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F of our report dated March 27, 2007, except for Note 17 which is as at
March 29, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to our consideration of internal control over
financial reporting), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Crystallex International Corporation (the "Company").

         We also consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration
Statement No. 333-108878 on Form F-1; Nos. 333-125380, 333-101583 and 333-91402
on Form F-3; No. 333-126997 on Form F-10; and No. 333-126128 on Form S-8 of
our report dated March 27, 2007, except for Note 17 which is as at March 29,
2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.


                                   /S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Toronto, Canada                    Deloitte & Touche LLP
March 30, 2007                     Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
#### AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. and Sun Pharma Global Fze, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2011-1095.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellants move without opposition to stay proceedings in this appeal pending the court’s disposition in *Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Hospira Inc.,*2011-1018, -1047, and separately move for an extension of time to file their initial brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to stay the briefing schedule is granted. The appellants are directed to inform this court, within 14 days of the issuance of this court’s mandate in 2011-1018, -1047, concerning how they believe that this appeal should proceed. The appellees may also respond within that time.

*363(2) The motion for an extension of time is denied as moot.
NO. 07-11-00299-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 3, 2011

IN THE INTEREST OF S.C.S., A CHILD

FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2008-544,627; HONORABLE KELLY G. MOORE, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

	Appellant, Chad Smith, perfected this appeal from a June 20, 2011 “Order on De Novo Appeal of Associate Judge Johnson’s Order Denying Motion to Enforce Courts’ Order and Order on Motion for Sanctions.”  On July 20, appellee, Jennifer Smith, filed a motion for new trial relating to the order appealed by Chad.  On July 27, the trial court granted Jennifer’s motion for new trial.  The legal effect of an order granting a new trial vacates the original judgment, and returns the case to the trial court as if no previous trial had been conducted.  Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); Long John Silver’s Inc. v. Martinez, 850 S.W.2d 773, 777 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1993, writ dism’d w.o.j.).  Thus, there is no final judgment from which Chad’s appeal may be prosecuted.

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

									Mackey K. Hancock

										Justice

2

2
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

SNYDERGENERAL CORPORATION AND TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2167-95-3 PER CURIAM MARCH 19, 1996 GERALD W. JOHNSON

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (J. Brian Jackson; Patricia C. Karppi; McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, on brief), for appellants. (George L. Townsend; Chandler, Franklin & O'Bryan, on brief), for appellee.

Syndergeneral Corporation and its insurer contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Gerald W.

Johnson's bilateral tendinitis and lateral and medial humeral epicondylitis qualify as compensable occupational diseases within the meaning of "disease" under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act").

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Stenrich Group v. Jemmott , ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act").2 Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision.

Reversed

.
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 Tennessee State Events
 Section TopicsTennessee HomeCounty OfficesCounty PCP DataDaily LDP RatesProgramsNewslettersState EventsNews ReleasesResources
 State Executive Director John Litz  Read John Litz'
 State Office Address 579 U.S. Courthouse801 Broadway
Nashville, TN37203(615) 277-2600
(855) 494-7764
 2022 Calendar of Events DateEvent InformationLocationSchedule Forthcoming
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
944 A.2d 751

#### Dwayne HILL, Appellant v. Jeffrey A. BEARD, Ph.D, Appellee.

No. 22 EAP 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 12, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2008, the above captioned appeal is herewith quashed for failure to file a brief.