alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O pinion filed May 21 , 201 5



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 5

- 00 08 2

- CV

__________

FRANK R. SALINAS , Appellant

V.

JASON ISAAC MIRAMONTES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 118th District Court

Howard County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. 50077

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Frank R. Salinas , filed a notice of appeal on April 7 , 201 5

. When

the appeal was filed, the clerk of th is court requested that Appellant f orward the $195

filing fee on or before April 17 , 201 5

. W e notified Appellant by letter dated A pril

23, 2015 , that the $195 filing fee was past due. In th at letter, we directed Appellant

to pay the filing fee on or before May 4, 2 01 5 , and informed him th at the failure to2

comply “ may result in dismissal of the case .” As of this date, Appellant has not

remitted the filing fee

.

Because A ppellant has failed to pay the required filing fee in this appeal , we

dismiss the appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5, 42.3.

PER CURIAM

May 21 , 201 5

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J., and Bailey , J.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2428

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade of the United States for the vessel SABLE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1993

Mr. TORKILDSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel SABLE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and section 12106 of title

5 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation

6 may issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate

7 endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the
2

•HR 2428 IH

1 United States for the vessel SABLE (Massachusetts reg2 istration number MS 1841 AM).

Æ
NEWS FROM
Petroleum Development Corporation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 5, 2003
**CONTACT: Darwin L. Stump - (304) 842-3597

www.petd.com
**PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT ADDS TO NATURAL GAS

COMMODITIES OPTIONS POSITIONS**
Bridgeport, West Virginia... Petroleum Development Corporation (NASDAQ/NMS PETD) today announced that it has added to previously announced natural gas commodities options positions to protect against possible price instability in future months. The Company purchased natural gas put options (floors) to provide downside price protection for the period from April 2004 through October 2004. These floors where paid for by selling call options (ceilings) for the same amounts and periods.

The Company set floors at $3.20 per million British thermal units (Mmbtu) and corresponding ceilings at $4.70 per Mmbtu for the period from April 2004 through October 2004 for approximately 25% of current production from its Piceance Basin wells in Colorado. Our contracts in the Piceance Basin are tied to the Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG) Index. The Company set NYMEX based floors at $4.00 per Mmbtu and corresponding ceilings at $5.65 per Mmbtu for the period from April 2004 through October 2004 for approximately 25% of current production in the Appalachian and Michigan Basins. Although the new hedged quantities represent approximately 25% of current production in the Appalachian, Michigan and Piceance Basins, increases in production rates in the future could change the percentage of gas covered by the hedge positions.

The accompanying tables summarize all of the Company's current hedging positions.

           Floors             
          Ceilings              **
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2629

Relating to the petition filed with respect to certain customs entries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1993

Mr. ROMERO-BARCELO ́ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

Relating to the petition filed with respect to certain customs

entries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF PETITION.

4 For purposes of section 520 of the Tariff Act of 1930

5 (19 U.S.C. 1520), and notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, the petition filed under subsection (c)(1) of

7 such section 520 (Customs Control No. 1001–0–201973)

8 and dated November 8, 1990, shall be deemed to have

9 been filed with the appropriate customs officer within 1

10 year after the date of the liquidation of entries 84–

11 4426808, 84–4427823, 84–4077985, 84–4080859, 84–
2

•HR 2629 IH

1 4080817, 84–4077723, 84–4075194, 84–4076481, and

2 84–4080930 made at New York, New York.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,135)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,797
<PP&E>                                       1,404,784
<DEPRECIATION>                               (305,769)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,210,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,566
<BONDS>                                        563,344
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           401
<OTHER-SE>                                     468,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,210,954
<SALES>                                        222,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,917
<CGS>                                           49,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,261)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,062)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,062)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.53)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from UNITED
INVESTORS  INCOME  PROPERTIES 2000 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000830056
<NAME>                              UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   295
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             55
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                10,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (3,546)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         7,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                             7,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           7,743
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         927
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           (11)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             252
<EPS-BASIC>                                             4.08 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0813. STEPHEN FRIEDMAN et al. v. FLYING CRUST, LLC et al.

Petitioners FlyingCrust, LLC, Garis Pierre Eddington, and Debra Ffrench filed

a petition seeking an interlocutory injunction, declaratory judgment, and equitable

relief against eight respondents: Fevzi Aydin, Koray Aydin, Henok Kebede, Binyam

Yayine, Stephen Friedman, Birole Kose, Aydin Jewelers, LLC, and Loop

Development, LLC. Several of the respondents moved to compel arbitration under an

operating agreement.

1 However, not all respondents were parties to the operating

agreement. The trial court thus granted the motion to compel to the extent it applied

to the parties to the operating agreement and stayed litigation pending the issuance

of an arbitration award. Four of the respondents filed a notice of appeal from this

order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

“As a general matter the grant of an application to compel arbitration is not

directly appealable pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4), but isinstead an interlocutory

matter reviewable pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).” Austin Regional Home Care, Inc.

v. Careminders Home Care, Inc., 344 Ga. App. 608, 608 (810 SE2d 676) (2018)

(punctuation omitted). Where, as here, the trial court’s order does not dismiss the

underlying action in its entirety, the appellants were required to follow the

interlocutory appeal procedures in order to appeal. See id. 608-609; OCGA § 5-6-34

1 The motion to compel was purportedly filed on behalf of Kebede, Kose,

Yayine, Friedman, and Loop Development. There was some question as to whether

the attorney who filed the motion to compel represented all of the respondents at the

time the motion was filed. 

February 04, 2022
(b). The appellants’ failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure

deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/04/2022
#### Azucena Morales ORTEGA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-74416.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

George Martin Zaehringer, Esq., Ventura, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mona Maria Yousif, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, CAS-District, San Diego, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Azucena Morales Ortega petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying petitioner’s motion to terminate and finding her removable because she engaged in alien smuggling in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i).

We review the BIA’s findings of fact for substantial evidence. *See Moran v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir.2005). In addition, as the BIA accepted the IJ’s findings of fact, we review the IJ’s deci*611sion, as part of the BIA’s. *See Alarcon-Serrano v. INS,*220 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2000). Petitioner testified that she was aware that her cousin, the smuggled alien, lacked legal documentation to cross the border, she told her cousin to lay down and covered him with a blanket after an immigration officer entered their van for inspection. Thus, the record provides substantial evidence to support the BIA’s conclusion that petitioner was removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i). *See Moran v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2005).

The petition for review and motion for stay of removal fail to raise any legal arguments regarding the BIA’s decision. The respondent filed a motion for summary disposition which petitioner has not opposed. Because petitioner has failed to raise a challenge to the BIA’s decision, respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Alexander Gordon Jardin, Chief Executive Officer of Franklin Credit Management Corporation,certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Franklin Credit Management Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) [Intentionally omitted.];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2008        By:                       /s/ Alexander Gordon Jardin    Alexander Gordon Jardin    Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7451

SCOTT WEDINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT

OF MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA03-2431-8-DKC)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wedington v.

U.S. District Court, No. CA-03-2431-8-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-21173), (Form S-3 No. 333-38219), (Form S-3 No. 333-57855),
(Form S-3 No. 333-68209), (Form S-3 No. 333-48380), (Form S-3 No. 333-64262),
(Form S-3 No. 333-91090), (Form S-3 No. 333-113531) of Hollywood Media Corp. and
in the related Prospectus', in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-14659) and (Form S-8 No. 333-45098) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option
Plan, as amended, and Directors Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-62152)
pertaining to the Hollywood Media Corp. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, 401(k) Plan
and the Director's Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-114176) pertaining to
the Hollywood Media Corp. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended October 30, 2003
and the Hollywood Media Corp. Directors Stock Option Plan as Amended May 1,
2003, of our report dated March 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Hollywood Media Corp. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                             Certified Public Accountants

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 28, 2005
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DONALD W. CARBARY,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D16-837

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 13, 2016

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Donald W. Carbary, Crawfordville, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and Kaylee Tatman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

Donald Carbary's petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion 

shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the order 

denying Carbary's motion for post-conviction relief rendered on April 24, 2015, in Case 

No. 2012-CF-00130, in the Circuit Court in and for Citrus County, Florida. See Fla. R. 

App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, WALLIS, EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
      (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
      general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.









/s/
      David Salzman


David
      Salzman


Chief
      Executive Officer of Richman Tax


Credit
      Properties Inc., general partner of


Richman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., general


partner
      of the Registrant


March
      14,
      2008
## April 20.Z0IS 9:3opi^ A^*.AWlAcosW4CVerV< v- OuA c& Grvv^nal AppoAs ot- Te*<iS P.O. &ov 12.208 Cc\pv \o\ S\oV* oh

11.07. \&SO£C\ 

### AvAV* SuS«^A\ed'J \ 1 

### T)cAUACj^4- °

j 1750 FM 9££ 

### ^UATx.^?02Z COUBTOF CWMINAl APPEALS 21 2015 ^©lAcosta, Clerk