alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-17646

 

 

UNITED INVESTORS INCOMEPROPERTIES

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

  Missouri                                          43-1483942

(State or other jurisdictionof                         (I.R.S. Employer

 incorporation ororganization)                        Identification No.)

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000830260
<NAME>                        Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         681
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  58295
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1401
<INVENTORY>                                    161891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240283
<PP&E>                                         854590
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (238112)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 919950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130587
<BONDS>                                        235000
<COMMON>                                       258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     357285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   919950
<SALES>                                        634852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               634852
<CGS>                                          528813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  528813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             27134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                35672
<INCOME-TAX>                                   13738
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            21934
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   21934
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.83


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7506

WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND; HARFORD COUNTY GOVERNMENT; HARFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JOHN WALKER, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-03-1388-DKC) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Allen Legg seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying various post-judgment motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 22, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on September 16, 2003. Because Legg failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Annual Return of Withheld Federal Income Tax

Form 945

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service Please type or print.

IRS USE ONLY

Name (as distinguished from trade name) Employer identification number T

Trade name, if any

FF

FD

Address (number and street)

FP

I

T

If address is

different

from prior

return, check

here ©

If you do not have to file returns in the future, check here © and enter date final payments paid ©

1 Federal income tax withheld from pensions, annuities, IRAs, gambling winnings, etc. 1

2 Backup withholding 2

© See separate instructions. For more information on income tax withholding, see Circular E.

OMB No. 1545-1430

3

4

5

3

4

5

Total taxes (add lines 1 and 2). This must equal line 7M below or line M of Form 945-A 

Total deposits for 1994 from your records 

Balance due (subtract line 4 from line 3). Pay to the Internal Revenue Service (See instructions.)

6 Overpayment, if line 3 is less than line 4, enter overpayment here © $ and check if to be:

Applied to next return OR Refunded

Monthly Summary of Federal Tax Liability

Tax liability for month

A January 

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

Total liability for

year (add lines A

through L)

M

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge

and belief, it is true, correct, and complete.

Print Your

Signature © Name and Title © Date ©

February

March 

April 

May 

June 

July

August

September 

October 

November

December

Tax liability for month Tax liability for month

Sign

Here

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice and instructions for completing this form, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 14584B Form 945 (9-94)

City, state, and ZIP code

7

Enter state

code for

state in

which

deposits

made ©

(see page 3

of

instructions).

IRS Use

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4

5 8 5 5 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

1

4545

Printed on recycled paper

● Monthly depositors: Complete line 7, entries A through M and check here ©

● Semiweekly depositors: Complete Form 945-A and check here ©

● All filers: If line 3 is less than $500, you need not complete line 7 or Form 945-A.

© For withholding reported on Forms 1099 and W-2G. (September 1994)
Form 8937

(December 2011)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Report of Organizational Actions 

Affecting Basis of Securities

▶ See separate instructions.

OMB No. 1545-2224

Part I Reporting Issuer

1 Issuer's name 2 Issuer's employer identification number (EIN)

3 Name of contact for additional information 4 Telephone No. of contact 5 Email address of contact

6 Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) of contact 7 City, town, or post office, state, and Zip code of contact

8 Date of action 9 Classification and description 

10 CUSIP number 11 Serial number(s) 12 Ticker symbol 13 Account number(s)

Part II Organizational Action Attach additional statements if needed. See back of form for additional questions.

14 Describe the organizational action and, if applicable, the date of the action or the date against which shareholders' ownership is measured for 

the action ▶

15 Describe the quantitative effect of the organizational action on the basis of the security in the hands of a U.S. taxpayer as an adjustment per 

share or as a percentage of old basis ▶

16 Describe the calculation of the change in basis and the data that supports the calculation, such as the market values of securities and the 

valuation dates ▶

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate Instructions. Cat. No. 37752P Form 8937 (12-2011)
Form 8937 (Rev. 12-2011) Page 2 

Part II Organizational Action (continued)

17 List the applicable Internal Revenue Code section(s) and subsection(s) upon which the tax treatment is based ▶

18 Can any resulting loss be recognized? ▶

19 Provide any other information necessary to implement the adjustment, such as the reportable tax year ▶

Sign 

Here

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and 

belief, it is true, correct, and complete. Declaration of preparer (other than officer) is based on all information of which preparer has any knowledge.

Signature ▶ Date ▶

Print your name ▶ Title ▶

Paid 

Preparer 

Use Only

Print/Type preparer’s name Preparer's signature Date Check if 

self-employed

PTIN

Firm’s name ▶

Firm's address ▶

Firm's EIN ▶

Phone no.

Send Form 8937 (including accompanying statements) to: Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Ogden, UT 84201-0054
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2411

AN ACT

For the relief of Leteane Clement Monatsi.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR LETEANE

4 CLEMENT MONATSI.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Leteane Clement Monatsi shall be

6 classified as a child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Im7 migration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval

8 of a relative visa petition filed under section 204 of such

9 Act by his adoptive parent and the filing of an application

10 for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
2

•HR 2411 EH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Leteane Clement

2 Monatsi enters the United States before the filing deadline

3 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of

7 the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe10 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant

11 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed

12 with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the

13 enactment of this Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Leteane Clement Monatsi, the Secretary of State

17 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the

18 current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level

19 of family-sponsored immigrants under section

20 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

21 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

22 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

23 parents, brothers, and sisters of Leteane Clement Monatsi

24 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any
3

•HR 2411 EH

1 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and

2 Nationality Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2411

AN ACT

For the relief of Leteane Clement Monatsi.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Bruce L. Bisson, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Torch Energy Royalty Trust,for which Wilmington Trust Company acts as Trustee;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and15d-15(e)), or for causingsuch procedures to be established or maintained, for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors:
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent Iconsider reasonable on information provided to me by Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated.         Date: April 21, 2005   By: /s/ Bruce L. Bisson               Bruce L. Bisson       Vice President       Wilmington Trust Company
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGELA RENDEROS-ABREGO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70193 

Agency No. A099-525-181 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. 

Angela Renderos-Abrego, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro 

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her 

motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70193 

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and 

dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Renderos-Abrego’s second 

motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred, where she failed to establish that 

she qualified for an exception to the time and number bars. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(c)(1), (3)(ii); Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996 (9th Cir. 2008) 

(evidence must demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief to warrant reopening 

based on changed country conditions). 

To the extent that Renderos-Abrego challenges the BIA’s underlying 

dismissal order and its denial of her first motion to reopen, we lack jurisdiction to 

consider her arguments because this petition for review was filed more than 30 

days after those decisions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (“The petition for review 

must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal.”); 

see also Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003) (30-day deadline is 

“mandatory and jurisdictional”).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of sua sponte reopening, 

where Renderos-Abrego has not raised a legal or constitutional error. See Bonilla

v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court has jurisdiction to 

review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the limited purpose of 

reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or constitutional error.”).
3 16-70193 

We also lack jurisdiction to consider the BIA’s denial of Renderos-Abrego’s 

request for prosecutorial discretion. See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 

(9th Cir. 2012) (order). 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED, in part; DISMISSED, in part.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-72086, No. 33-86040 and No. 333-05643 of The Talbots, Inc. and its
subsidiaries on Forms S-8 of our reports dated March 11, 1998, appearing in and
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Talbots, Inc.
and its subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 1998.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP
April 30, 1998
Boston, Massachusetts
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11117-11118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4326]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-381, MM Docket No. 99-268, RM-9691]

Digital Television Broadcast Service; Chattanooga, TN

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Sarkes Tarzian, Inc., 
licensee of station WRCB-TV, NTSC channel 3, substitutes DTV channel 13 
for DTV channel 55 at Chattanooga, Tennessee.

[[Page 11118]]

See 64 FR 45500, August 20, 1999. DTV channel 13 can be allotted to 
Chattanooga in compliance with the principal community coverage 
requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference coordinates (35-09-40 N. 
and 85-18-52 W.) with a power of 37.0, HAAT of 325 meters and with a 
DTV service population of 915 thousand.
    With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective April 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-268, adopted February 15, 2001, and 
released February 16, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Digital television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.

Sec. 73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of Digital Television Allotments 
under Tennessee, is amended by removing DTV channel 55 and adding DTV 
channel 13 at Chattanooga.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-4326 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```