alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2457 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2457

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a salmon captive 
                          broodstock program.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2457

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a salmon captive 
                          broodstock program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Winter Run Chinook Salmon Captive 
Broodstock Act of 1993.''

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (d), the Secretary of the 
Interior (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ``Secretary'') 
shall conduct in accordance with this section a salmon captive 
broodstock program (hereinafter in this section referred to as the 
``Program'').
    (b) Program.--The program shall be carried out in a manner that is 
consistent with the goals, priorities, and policies set forth in any 
recovery plan for winter run Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River 
developed by the National Marine Fisheries Service under the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, and with findings of consultations regarding that 
population of salmon carried out pursuant to section 7 of that Act.
    (c) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with the Winter Run 
Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Committee (a committee identified in 
the document entitled ``Biological Assessment on the Effects of Coleman 
National Fish Hatchery Operations on Winter Run Chinook Salmon'', 
prepared by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service) in making 
management decisions regarding the Program.
    (d) State Matching.--The Secretary may not implement this section 
unless not less than 20 percent of amounts necessary to conduct the 
Program are provided by non-Federal sources.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to conduct the Program $1,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 20, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
Corporate Passive Activity Loss and Credit Limitations OMB No. 1545-1091

Form 8810

© Attach to the corporation’s tax return (personal service

corporations and closely held corporations only). Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Name Employer identification number

1998 Passive Activity Loss

1a Current year income (from Worksheet 2, column (a)) 1a

1b

b Current year deductions and losses (from Worksheet 2,

column (b))

c 1c

1d

d

2

2

3

3

4

4

6 6

7

7

8

8

9

9

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 8810 (1998)

© See separate instructions.

Prior year unallowed losses (from Worksheet 2, column (c))

Combine lines 1a, 1b, and 1c. If the result is net income or zero, see page 8 of the

instructions

Closely held corporations enter net active income and see page 8 of the instructions.

Personal service corporations enter -0- on this line

Unallowed passive activity deductions and losses. Combine lines 1d and 2. If the

result is net income or zero, see the instructions for lines 1d and 3 on page 8.

Otherwise, go to line 4

Total deductions and losses allowed. Add the income, if any, on lines 1a and 2

and enter the result. See page 8 of the instructions

Prior year unallowed credits (from Worksheet 5, column (b))

Add lines 5a and 5b

Enter the tax attributable to net passive income and net active income. See page

10 of the instructions

Unallowed passive activity credit. Subtract line 7 from line 6. If the result is zero

or less, enter -0-

Allowed passive activity credit. Subtract line 8 from line 6. See page 11 of the

instructions

1998 Passive Activity Credits

b

5a 5a

5b

Current year credits (from Worksheet 5, column (a))

( )

( )

Part I

Part II

Cat. No. 10356T

Part III Election To Increase Basis of Credit Property

10 If the corporation disposed of its entire interest in a passive activity or former passive activity in a fully taxable

transaction, and the corporation elects to increase the basis of credit property used in that activity by the unallowed

credit that reduced the property’s basis, check this box. See page 12 of the instructions ©

Name of passive activity disposed of ©

Description of the credit property for which the election is being made ©

Amount of unallowed credit that reduced the property’s basis © $

11

12

13

Caution: See the instructions and complete Worksheets 1 and 2 on page 7 before completing Part I.

Caution: See the instructions and complete Worksheet 5 on page 11 before completing Part II.

1998
[No. 25194-2-III.

Division Three.

August 16, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jesse Abram Alvarado, *Appellant.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 05-1-00652-3, Blaine G. Gibson, J., entered May 12, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Stephens, J.
#### TOSHIBA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Intervenors. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Appellants, v. International Trade Commission, Appellee, and Toshiba Corporation, Intervenor.

No. 2007-1122, 2007-1178.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 27, 2007.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to dismiss their respective appeals,

*983IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. All other motions are moot.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

In the document appearing on page 8776, FR Doc 01-2894, in the issue of February 2, 2001, in the third column the Committee published an addition to the Procurement List for Holder, Label w/Slit, 9905-01-365-2125. The addition notice is amended to indicate that 50% of the Governments Requirement is being added to the Procurement List. 

G. John Heyer, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-4525 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
Re: Support Letter (Financial)
   1.
    
    We have already provided guarantee for Ts borrowings from the financial institutions (the
amount of whose balance is US$265 million as of April 1, 2009). We agree to continue to
provide guarantee for Ts new borrowings to refinance certain borrowings due on or before
April 16, 2010 out of the existing borrowings secured by our guarantee.
  Bank
    
    Principal
    
    EndMizuhoCB
    
    
    75
    
    
    
    2009.12.29MizuhoCB
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    2010.04.17MizuhoCB
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    2010.01.25Mitsu Sumitomo
    
    
    50
    
    
    
    2009.12.31Mitsu Sumitomo
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    2010.01.28Norin Chuo Kinko
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    2010.01.04Norin Chuo Kinko
    
    
    28
    
    
    
    2009.04.17Mitsubishi Tokyo UFJ
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    2009.12.31Mitsubishi Tokyo UFJ
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    2012.04.13Bank Borrowing Total
    
    
    265
 2.
    
    Should any financial institution fail to agree to refinance any of the existing borrowings
due on or before April 16, 2010, or if any other condition occurs that Aeon to make a payment
under the guarantee to either T or any financial




---



##### 



institution, then we agree to make a loan to T due on after
April 16, 2010 to avoid lack of Ts
financial resources to be caused by such failure of refinancing within the limits of our
guarantee and on or before April 16, 2010.
   By :
    
    /s/ Masaaki ToyoshimaMasaaki ToyoshimaVice PresidentChief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Re:
    
    Letter of Support
         By:
    
    /s/ Masaaki ToyoshimaMasaaki ToyoshimaVice PresidentChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                   87,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            86,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              3,000
<INVENTORY>                                              20,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        191,000
<PP&E>                                                  862,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          300,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          943,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                15,653,000
<BONDS>                                               1,520,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                              2,637,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (18,867,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            943,000
<SALES>                                                 372,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        372,000
<CGS>                                                   319,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           319,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      756,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (10,475,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (10,475,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (10,475,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.45)
        

</TABLE>
August
      17, 2006





William
      Sullivan


264
      Water
      Street


New
      York,
      NY 10038





This
      letter sets forth proposals for the amendment of your employment agreement
      with
      Franklin Credit Management Corporation, dated as of February 1, 2006 and amended
      as of April 28, 2006.




|1. | We
              hereby propose to amend your employment agreement such that, effective
              August 17, 2006, your title shall be Chief Operating Officer and you
              shall
              perform the duties commensurate with such
              position.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



If
      you
      agree to the foregoing, please sign where indicated below and return the signed
      copy to me. Otherwise, the agreement will continue in full force and effect,
      without amendment.





Sincerely,





FRANKLIN
      CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION






________________________________


Name:
      Gordon Jardin


Title:
      CEO








AGREED
      AND ACCEPTED







____________________________


William
      F. Sullivan
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000829905
<NAME> SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         719,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               719,809
<PP&E>                                       2,707,404
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,427,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,408,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,427,213
<SALES>                                        746,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               746,419
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                707,634
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   707,634
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RO N A LD P. FO STER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. SAND RA COLE , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 16676 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 3 - c v - 0 1 1 1 3 - J A MJ FM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . M e nde z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an d C A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner R on al d P . F ost erappeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c our t ’ s j udgm e nta s am a tt e rof l a w pur s ua ntt o F e de r a l R ul e of C i vi l P r oc e dur e 50 f o llo w in g aju ry tr ia l in F o s te r ’s 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g E ig h th 

# FI LED JAN 25 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16676 2 A m e n d m e n t v io la tio n s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e d is m is s . W e a re un abl e t o con si der F ost er ’ s c on t ent i on s thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y g r a n tin g d e f

e n d a n t’s m o tio n f

o rju d g m e n t a s am a tte ro f la w , a n d b y a lle g e d ly e xc l udi ng w i tne s s t e s t i m ony , be c aus e F os t e rf a i l e d t o pr ovi de a ny por t i on of the tr ia l tr a n s c r ip t. See F e d . R . A p p . P . 1 0 ( b ) ( 2 ) ; H al l v. W hi t ley , 935 F . 2d 164, 165 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . F u r th e rm o r e , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n o t ab u s e its di s c r e t i on by de ny i ng w i thoutpr e j udi c e F os t e r ’ s r e que s tf orpr oduc t i on of tr a ns c r i pt s a tgove rnm e nte xpe ns e be c aus e F os t e rdi d note xpl a i n the i s s ue s tha the w o u ld r a is e o n ap p e a l. Se e McKi nne y v . A nde rs on , 9 2 4 F .2 d 1 5 0 0 , 1 5 1 1 - 1 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ) , overruled on other groun ds by H el l i ngv. McKi nn ey , 502 U . S . 903 ( 1991) ( r e vi e w i ng f

ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on a nd not i ng tha t“ [ p] r oduc t i on of the tran scri p tatg o v ern m en tex p en se fo r an ap p el l an ti n fo rm a p au p eri s i n a ci v i l case i s pr ope runde r28 U . S . C . § 753 i f atr i a l j udge c e r t i f

i e s tha tthe appe a l i s not fr i vo l ou s and pres ent s asubst ant i al qu es t i on ”) . DI S MI S S E D.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Mark L. Meriwether, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:August 14, 2007By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director    1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6714

In Re: ELTRENTROSE F. LIVERMAN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-922-2)

Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eltrentrose F. Liverman, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eltrentrose F. Liverman has filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus seeking an order from this court directing the district

court to rule on his successive motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2000). Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist.

Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). “[C]ourts are extremely reluctant

to grant a writ of mandamus.” In re Ford Motor Co., 751 F.2d 274,

275 (8th Cir. 1984). In seeking mandamus relief, Liverman carries

the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to

attain the relief sought and that his right to such relief is clear

and indisputable. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d

135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). We find that Liverman has failed to meet

this burden and thus we deny the petition. We deny Liverman’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Mark Meriwether, CEO, President, Secretary/Treasurer
and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Dated: 11/21/2005                        /s/Mark Meriwether
                                         -------------------------
                                         President
                                         CEO
                                         Secretary
                                         Treasurer
                                         Director