alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7152** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. VINCENT HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Vin Rock, a/k/a Barrack , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the D istrict of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cr - 00266

- JFM

- 3 ; 1:15

- cv - 00802

- JFM )

Submitted : December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Vincent Hernandez , Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Joseph Enright, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Charlotte, North Carolina, Joshua Thomas Ferrentino, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Vincent Hernandez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 201 2 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is deb atable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hernandez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Donald R. LEVITT, Appellant, v. Beth MAXWELL-STRATTON, Trustee—Appellee, and Miriam Levitt, Debtor—Appellee.

No. 07-16277.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2009.*

Filed Jan. 23, 2009.

Donald R. Levitt, Fresno, CA, pro se.

Jeffrey L. Wall, Attorney at Law, Fresno, CA, for Trustee-Appellee.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*128MEMORANDUM **

Attorney Donald Levitt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting authority to the Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Miriam Levitt, Donald Levitt’s former wife, to sell co-owned real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact and review de novo its conclusions of law. *Preblich v. Battley,*181 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir.1999). We review de novo the district court’s decision on appeal from a bankruptcy court. *Id.*We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly granted authority to the Trustee to sell the estate’s interest in the real property to Mrs. Levitt, subject to all existing liens and the claimed homestead exemption. *See Teel v. Teel (In re Teel),*34 B.R. 762, 764 (9th Cir. BAP 1983) (when one spouse files for bankruptcy protection, all community assets become assets of the bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(2)); 11 U.S.C. § 363(h) (authorizing trustee to sell both the estate’s interest and the interest of any co-owner in property). Per his wishes, Mr. Levitt is now free to bring his contentions concerning his potential community property interest in the homestead exemption to the family law court. *See Teel,*34 B.R. at 764 (“If legitimate creditor interests exist in the case of a solvent debtor involved in a divorce proceeding, a prudent approach would be for the bankruptcy court to expeditiously liquidate sufficient assets to pay creditors in full and then return the case to the dissolution court.”) (quoting 4 *Collier on Bankruptcy*(15th Ed.1983) ¶ 541.15); see *also MacDonald v. MacDonald,*755 F.2d 715 (9th Cir.1985) (“It is appropriate for bankruptcy courts to avoid incursions into family law matters out of consideration for court economy, judicial restraint, and deference to our state court brethren and their established expertise in such matters.”) (citation omitted).

The district court properly declined to consider the other issues raised by Mr. Levitt because he did not raise them before the bankruptcy court. *See United States v. Shaltry (In re Home America T.V.-Appliance Audio, Inc.),*232 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir.2000).

Mr. Levitt’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 
  





 
 June 29, 2020 

Blaine Templeman 
 *** 

*** 
  

	 	Re:	 Option Extension 



Dear Blaine: 
 This letter is to inform you that
in connection with entering into the proposed merger transaction pursuant to the that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization among Aduro Biotech, Inc. (the “Company”), Aspire Merger Sub, Inc., and Chinook
Therapeutics U.S., Inc. dated as of June 1, 2020 (the “Chinook Transaction”), the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the following treatment of your options to purchase the Company’s common stock (each, an
“Option”). In the event of your Separation from Service (as defined in the Aduro Biotech, Inc. Amended and Restated Severance Plan and Summary Plan Description (the “Severance Plan”)), your then-outstanding Options
(to the extent vested, after giving effect to any applicable acceleration), will remain outstanding and exercisable until 18 months following the date of such Separation from Service plus an additional 180 days in the event that shares issuable upon
the exercise of any such Options would be subject to the terms of a lock-up agreement in connection with the Chinook Transaction following your Separation from Service; provided, however, that no option shall
remain exercisable following the expiration of its term 
 Except as otherwise set forth in this letter, all terms and conditions of the
Options remain the same. Please indicate your acknowledgment and agreement with this letter by signing in the space below and return this letter to Celeste Ferber at cferber@aduro.com no later than July 2, 2020. Upon the Company’s receipt
of your signed letter, each Option Agreement will be deemed amended to the extent necessary to reflect the terms of this letter. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Celeste Ferber at cferber@aduro.com. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Celeste Ferber
	
	Celeste Ferber
	SVP, General Counsel and Secretary


 Acknowledged and agreed: 
  

					
	 /s/ Blaine Templeman
	  	    	  	Date: 7/1/2020                        
	Blaine Templeman
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maxim
C. W. Webb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May
7, 2009





/s/ Maxim C. W.
Webb


Maxim
C.W. Webb


Chief
Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Global Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Anastasios N. Kyriakides, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and b) The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Anastasios N. Kyriakides
                                        Anastasios N. Kyriakides
                                        Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                                        Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
                                        February 7, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Harris County Self-Insured v. Levent Dogan

Appellate case number: 01-19-01006-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-14504

Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County

The motion for en banc reconsideration filed by appellee Levent Dogan on September 16, 

2021 is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Peter Kelly_______

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, 

Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris. 

Date: ___October 7, 2021___
Form 8966

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

FATCA Report

▶ Information about Form 8966 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8966.

OMB No. 1545-2246

2014

Check if report is being corrected, amended, or voided

Corrected report Amended report Voided report

Part I Identification of Filer

1 Name of Filer 

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State/Province/Region 3c Country (including postal code)

4 Global Intermediary Identification Number (GIIN)

. . .

5 TIN

6 Name of Sponsored Entity or Intermediary, if applicable

7 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

8a City or town 8b State/Province/Region 8c Country (including postal code)

9 GIIN

. . .

10 TIN

Part II Account Holder or Payee Information

1 Name of Account Holder or Payee

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State/Province/Region 3c Country (including postal code)

4 TIN

5 If account holder or payee is an entity, check applicable box to specify the entity's type:

Owner-Documented FFI with specified U.S. owner(s) Passive NFFE with substantial U.S. owner(s)

Non-Participating FFI Specified U.S. Person

Direct Reporting NFFE

Part III Identifying Information of U.S. Owners that are specified U.S. Persons

1 Name of Owner

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State/Province/Region 3c Country (including postal code)

4 TIN of Owner

Part IV Financial Information

1 Account Number 2 Currency Code 

3 Account Balance

4a Interest

4b Dividends

4c Gross proceeds/Redemptions

4d Other

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 55748F Form 8966 (2014) 
Form 8966 (2014) Page 2 

Part V Pooled Reporting Type

1 Check applicable Pooled Reporting Type (check only one):

Recalcitrant account holders with U.S. Indicia

Dormant Accounts

Recalcitrant account holders that are U.S. persons

Recalcitrant account holders without U.S. Indicia

Non-participating FFI

Recalcitrant account holders that are passive NFFEs

2 Number of Accounts 3 Aggregate payment amount

4 Aggregate account balance 5 Currency Code

Form 8966 (2014)
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maxim C. W. Webb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  November 5, 2009





/s/ Maxim C. W. Webb


Maxim C.W. Webb


Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2508

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzoxazol.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1993

Mr. QUILLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzoxazol.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.33 Benzoxazol

(provided for in

subheading

3204,20.50) .... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/94 ’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re9 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse con-
2

•HR 2508 IH

1 sumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the

2 enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Gordon F. DuGanGordon F. DuGanVice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[No. 25244-2-III.

Division Three.

August 23, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Juan J. Gomez-Vasquez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 05-1-01044-5, Kathleen M. O’Connor, J., entered May 22, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Brown, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the second quarter 2000 report on Form 10-Q for LabOne, Inc. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000830158
<NAME> LABONE, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,369,529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,703,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,998,328
<INVENTORY>                                  2,959,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,288,644
<PP&E>                                      85,458,101
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,943,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,365,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,361,930
<BONDS>                                     32,247,126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,845,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,365,594
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,742,069
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,364,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,291,594
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,098,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,246,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,465,706
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            781,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   781,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ Robert Fung

Name: Robert FungTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 31, 2009/s/ Hemdat Sawh

Name: Hemdat SawhTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 31, 2009
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of BSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Howard W. SharpHoward W. Sharp President and Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BSB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by BSB Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



34
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 10-0413

IN RE CHRISTUS HEALTH AND CHRISTUS HEALTH GULF COAST

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ emergency motion for temporary relief, filed June 1, 2010, is granted in part.  The trial court’s discovery order dated May 19, 2010 with regards to Requests for Production Nos. 1-5 and 7, in Cause No. 2005-36179, styled *Linda G. Carswell, individually and as representative of the Estate of Jerry L. Carswell, deceased, Robert J. Carswell, and Jordan D. Carswell v. Christus Health and Christus Health Gulf Coast d/b/a Christus St. Joseph Hospital, Christina K. Pramudji, M.D., Paul C. Cook, M.D., Memorial Urology Associates, P.A., Jeffrey W. Terrel, M.D., Roupen H. Kekmezian, M.D., and SJ Associated Pathology, L.C.*, in the 165th District Court of Harris County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this June 2, 2010.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Annual Report of Avondale Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 29, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Stephen Felker, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: November 10, 2003                             /s/ G. STEPHEN FELKER
                                                    ---------------------
                                                        G. Stephen Felker
                                                        Chairman, President and
                                                        Chief Executive Officer