alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS CORPORATION v. HUDSON and four other cases.

Nos. 25621-25625.

Nov. 20, 1934

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1935.

Allen, Underwood & Canterbury and Paul Pinson, for plaintiff in error.

Bailey E. Bell, for defendants in error.

OSBORN, J.

An examination of the record discloses that the issues of law and fact in the above styled and numbered causes are identical with those in cause No. 23205, Oklahoma Natural Gas Corporation v. Joe Douglas (this day decided), 170 Okla. 284, 39 P. (2d) 578.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

RILEY, C. J., CULLISON, Y. C. J., and SWINDALL, McNEILL, BAYLESS, and WELCH, JJ., concur. ANDREWS and BUSBY, JJ., absent.
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION



Exhibit 99.2



Written Statement of
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of BSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(c) |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(d) |  | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    REXFORD C.
DECKERRexford C. Decker Chief Financial Officer May 15,
2003




A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BSB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained BSB Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         168,422
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,690,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,039,343
<PP&E>                                         632,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,911,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,010,153
<BONDS>                                      1,049,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,220
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,840,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,911,880
<SALES>                                      6,232,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,232,555
<CGS>                                        1,581,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,581,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (197,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (197,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,787)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
2009-1749.

#### Torrance v. West.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon review of relator’s proffered affidavit of indigency, submitted to waive the filing fee and security deposit,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that within ten days of the date of this order relator shall either submit the $40 filing fee and $100 security deposit required by S.Ct.Prae.R. XV or show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action, or any future actions, without payment of the filing fee and security deposit.
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 Contact Us
 Section TopicsMIDAS Home PageMIDAS News and InformationContact Us
 Contact Us Questions or comments? You can reach the MIDAS team through the extensive FSA online knowledge base, **Ask USDA**. You can also contact us at midaspmo@wdc.usda.gov. Please click here for a list of FSA news media contacts.  Join Our Mailing List You can join the mailing list for MIDAS and other FSA programs and initiatives at GovDelivery.
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
#### Avtar SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73918.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*83Submitted June 29, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 10, 2011.

Robert Bradford Jobe, Esquire, Law Offices of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Michael Christopher Heyse, Trial, OIL, Edward Earl Wiggers, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Avtar Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We review for substantial evidence, *Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that, even if Singh established a well-founded fear of persecution, the government established by a preponderance of the evidence that Singh could reasonably relocate within India. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(3)(ii); *Sowe v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 1281, 1287 (9th Cir.2008). Accordingly, Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez,*336 F.3d at 1001.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Singh failed to demonstrate that it was more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to India. *See Hasan v. Ashcroft,*380 F.3d 1114, 1122-23 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2009-1213.

#### Spangler v. State.

Lake App. No. 2008-L-062, 2009-Ohio-3178. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, *State v. Bodyke,*Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q OF ALUMAX INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              68
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      470
<ALLOWANCES>                                        18
<INVENTORY>                                        524
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,165
<PP&E>                                           3,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              499
<BONDS>                                            674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,343
<SALES>                                          2,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,463
<CGS>                                            1,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    390
<INCOME-TAX>                                       159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.18


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2544

To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to allow persons who

suffer discrimination or a loss of business as a result of a violation

of the anti-boycott provisions, to bring an action for damages against

the person committing the violation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 28, 1993

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Foreign Affairs and the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Export Administration Act of 1979 to allow

persons who suffer discrimination or a loss of business

as a result of a violation of the anti-boycott provisions,

to bring an action for damages against the person committing the violation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 8(a) of the Export Administration Act of

4 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2407(a)) is amended by adding at

5 the end the following:

6 ‘‘(6) Any person—
2

HR 2544 IH

1 ‘‘(A) against whom an act of discrimination de2 scribed in paragraph (1)(B) is committed, or

3 ‘‘(B) who, on account of a violation of the regu4 lations issued pursuant to this subsection, loses an

5 opportunity to engage in a commercial venture pur6 suant to a contract, joint venture, or other commer7 cial transaction, including an opportunity to bid or

8 tender an offer for a contract,

9 may bring an action in an appropriate district court of

10 the United States against the United States person com11 mitting the violation, for recovery of actual damages in12 curred on account of such act of discrimination or lost

13 opportunity. In any such action the court may award puni14 tive damages.’’.

Æ
#### ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Mercedes ZOTA, Miguel Zota, Defendants-Third Party-Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Lighthouse Intracoastal, Inc., Jack Farji, an individual, Broward Executive Builders, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, R.A. Brandon & Co., Inc., Third Party-Defendant.

No. 09-14026.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 18, 2011.

Robert C. Buschel, Buschel Gibbons, P.A., Matthew Douglas Weissing, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Ft Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants-Third Party-Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Michael David Kaplan, Kaplan Law Group, PA, Hollywood, FL, for Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Douglas M. McIntosh, Robert C. Weill, McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya, P.A., Ft Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff-AppelleeCross-Appellant.

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Mercedes Zota, Lighthouse Intracoastal, Inc., Jack Farji, and Broward Executive Builders, Inc. appeal from a Final Declaratory Judgment in favor of Essex Insurance Company concluding that there is no coverage for Zota’s injury under the liability insurance policy issued by Essex to Lighthouse and therefore, Essex was not re*324quired to indemnify Lighthouse or defend it with regard to Zota’s state court negligence action. Essex also cross-appeals several of the district court’s rulings.

After having carefully considered all of the issues in this case, including Essex’s cross-appeal, and based on the record and arguments of counsel, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 13.1**

** **

**906 CERTIFICATION**

** **

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December31, 2005 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Mario Valcarce, the Chief Executive Officer andAlfredo Ergas, the Chief Financial Officer of ENERSIS S.A., each certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.     the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;and

 

2.     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ENERSIS S.A..

 

 

Date: March 16, 2006

 

 
|   | /s/ Mario Valcarce D.   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Mario Valcarce D.       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Alfredo Ergas S.    |   |
|   | Alfredo Ergas S.        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Thomas W. HILL, Debtor-Appellant, v. David Richard HILLIER, Defendant-Appellee, Michael T. Hill, Trustee of the Thomas W. Hill Family Trust, Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 08-1879.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.

Decided: March 3, 2009.

Thomas W. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. David Richard Hillier, Gum, Hillier & McCloskey, PA, Asheville, North Carolina; William Edmund Loose, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas W. Hill appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing as interlocutory his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order enforcing certain terms of a settlement agreement; (2) denying his motion for recusal; and (3) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hill v. Hillier,*No. 1:08-cv-00080-LHT, 2008 WL 2331028 (W.D.N.C. June 4, 2008) & *Hill v. Hillier,*No. 1:08-cv-00080-LHT, 2008 WL 2893435 (July 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
SCHEDULE P Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Changes of Interests

(Form 8865) in a Foreign Partnership

OMB No. 1545-1668

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  Attach To Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

Name of person filing Form 8865 Filer’s identifying number

Acquisitions

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25943Q Schedule P (Form 8865) 2003

Part I

Part II

(under section 6046A)

(e)

% of interest

before acquisition

(b)

Date of acquisition

(a)

Name, address, and identifying number of

person from whom your interest was acquired

Dispositions

Part III Change in Proportional Interest

Part IV

(c)

FMV of

interest acquired

(d)

Basis in

interest acquired

(f)

% of interest

after acquisition

(a)

Description of change

Name of foreign partnership

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions)

(e)

% of interest

before disposition

(b)

Date of disposition

(c)

FMV of

interest disposed

(d)

Basis in

interest disposed

(f)

% of interest

after disposition

(a)

Name, address, and identifying number of

person who acquired your interest

(e)

% of interest

before change

(b)

Date of change

(c)

FMV of

interest

(d)

Basis in

interest

(f)

% of interest

after change

2003
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2015

No. 04-15-00785-CR

Billy Jack GUERRA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4609

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

A trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal has been filed in this appeal. 

The trial court judge has certified that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, and 

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Therefore, we ORDER the trial court clerk to file an 

electronic clerk’s record within TEN DAYS from the date of this order containing the following 

documents:

1. all pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. the Court’s Admonishments, the defendant’s Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of 

Testimony, and any other stipulations, and all other documents relating to the 

defendant=s plea bargain;

3. the Judgment;

4. all post-judgment motions and orders;

5. the Notice of Appeal;

6. the Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. the Criminal Docket Sheet.
We DIRECT the clerk of this court to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, 

the trial court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in 

this appeal.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


WASHINGTON,
      DC 20549





**FORM
      8-K**




CURRENT
      REPORT


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





October
      15, 2007


*Date
      of report (Date of earliest event reported)*











**Petroleum
      Development Corporation**


*Exact
      Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter*





**Nevada**
            **0-7246**
            **95-2636730***State
                or Other Jurisdiction*
              *of
                Incorporation*
            *Commission*
              *File
                Number*
            *IRS
                Employer*
              *Identification
                Number*





**120
      Genesis Boulevard, Bridgeport, WV  26330**


*Address
      of Principal Executive Offices*





**304-842-3597**


*Registrant's
      telephone number, including area code*





Check
      the
      appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
      satisfy the filing


obligation
      of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction
      A.2. below):





[    
                ]
            Written
                communications pursuant to Rule 425 under Securities Act (17 CFR
                230.425)[    
                ]
            Soliciting
                material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
                240.14a-12)[    
                ]
            Pre-commencement
                communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
                CFR
                240.14d-2(b))[    
                ]
            Pre-commencement
                communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
                CFR
                240.13e-4(c))





**No
      Change**


*Former
      Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report*







**Item
                8.01**
            **Other
                events.**





On
      October 15, 2007, Petroleum Development Corporation  announced it has
      entered into a definitive agreement to purchase a majority working interest
      in
      approximately 760 natural gas wells located in southwestern Pennsylvania, which
      are operated by Castle Gas Company, Inc.











**EXHIBIT
      INDEX**





**Item
      9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.**





(c)            Exhibits.




**News
      Release:** Petroleum Development Corporation Enters Into a
      Definitive Agreement With Castle Gas Company, Inc.











Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
      duly authorized.








**PETROLEUM
      DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION**





Date:
            October
                15, 2007By:
            /s/
                Richard W. McCulloughRichard
                W. McCulloughChief
                Financial Officer