alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael W. AUGUST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOVEY, Director of Adult Institutions; James E. Tilton, Secretary of the CDCR; Martin Veal, Warden; J. Martinez, Captain; P. Mirich, Lt.; M. Cry, Appeals Coordinator; S. Moreno, Associate Warden; K. Carroll, Sergeant, Defendants—Appellants.

No. 07-16844.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*115Submitted Jan. 12, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 14, 2011.

Michael W. August, San Luis Obispo, CA, pro se.

David Carrasco, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, NOONAN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

August doesn’t allege any condition that enhanced his sentence in “such an unexpected manner as to give rise to protection by the Due Process Clause of its own force,” or imposed an “atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” *Ghana v. Pearce,*159 F.3d 1206, 1209 (9th Cir.1998) (quoting *Sandin v. Conner,*515 U.S. 472, 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995)). His due process claim therefore fails.

REVERSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1355-DR]


Oklahoma; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Oklahoma, (FEMA-1355-DR), dated January 5, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of January 5, 2001:

Blaine, Canadian, Custer, Garfield, Kingfisher, Kiowa, Logan, Mayes, 
Osage, Payne, Pawnee, Roger Mills and Tillman for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Robert J. Adamcik,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-4136 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-U
#### Dina Maribel LUNA-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-73055.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 11, 2014.

Raul Gomez, Esquire, Law Office of Raul Gomez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Sunah Lee, Trial, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dina Maribel Luna-Ramirez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the incidents Luna-Ramirez experienced, including death threats, did not rise to the level of persecution. *See Nahrvani v. Gonzales,*399 F.3d 1148, 1153-54 (9th Cir.2005) (record did not compel the finding that the incidents of harm petitioner suffered constituted past persecution). We reject Luna-Ramirez’s contentions that the agency failed to consider evidence relevant to her claim of persecution. Further, as Luna-Ramirez has not established past persecution, she is not entitled to a presumption of future persecution. *See Molinar-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1096 (9th Cir.2002). As Luna-Ramirez does not otherwise contend she has shown a well-founded fear of persecution, her asylum claim fails.

In light of these conclusions, we do not reach Luna-Ramirez’s other contentions or her request for judicial notice relating to her ability to relocate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-229-000]


Trunkline LNG Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

February 16, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 13, 2001, Trunkline LNG Company (TLNG) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1-A, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A attached to the filing to 
become effective March 15, 2001.
    TLNG states that the purpose of this filing, made in accordance 
with the provisions of Section 154.204 of the Commission's Regulations, 
is to establish the flexibility under TLNG's tariff to negotiate rates 
in accordance with the Commission's Statement of Policy on Alternatives 
to Traditional Cost-of-Service Rate making for Natural Gas Pipelines, 
Docket No. RM95-6-000 and Regulation of Negotiated Transportation 
Services of Natural Gas Pipelines, Docket No. RM96-7-000 issued January 
31, 1996 (Policy Statement). This filing establishes a negotiated/
recourse rate program applicable to TLNG's Rate Schedule FTS consistent 
with the Policy Statement as well as other Commission pronouncements 
respecting negotiated rate filings.
    TLNG states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
jurisdictional customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4502 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered January 30, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00981-CR

RORY HOGENSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 063011

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the request of the Grayson County District Clerk for an extension of 

time to file the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. We ORDER that the 

supplemental record containing the completed certification be filed by FEBRUARY 20, 2015.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Rayburn Nall, Jr., Presiding Judge, 59th Judicial District Court; Kelly Ashmore, 

Grayson County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Order entered September 1 9 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00983
- CV FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, L .L.P., Appellant

V. DEION L. SANDERS, Appellee On Appeal from th e 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 02996
- 2016



### O RDER Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), we ORDER Collin County District Clerk Lynne Finley to file, no later than September 23, 2016, a supplem ental clerk’s record containing a copy of the trial court’s July 29, 2016 temporary injunction. To allow appellant an opportunity to cite to the supplemental clerk’s record in its brief, we extend the deadline to file appellant’s brief on our own motion a nd ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 30, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CU RT L. BU RRI S, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. J E F F R E Y P . W A L K E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 17675 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 6 8 9 - R L HG WF ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R oge rL . H unt , C hi e f

D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C urtL . B urri s, a N evada s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n c h a lle n g in g h is di sc i pl i naryconv i ct i on for achar ge thatw as no tl i st ed i n the N ot i ce of C harges 

# FI LED MA R 08 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSD S/ Res ea r ch 08- 17675 2 p r o v id e d to B u rr is p r io rto th e h e a r in g . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo, B u tte r fie ld v . B a il , 12 0 F . 3d 10 23 , 10 24 (9th C i r. 1 9 9 7 ) , a n d w e a f

f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d the due pr oc e s s c l a i m be c aus e the n o t i ce co n t ai n ed su ffi ci en ti n fo rm at i o n t o al l o w B u rri s t o p resen ta p ro p er d efen se a t h is d is c ip lin a ryh e a r in g . Se e B os t i c v . Car l s on , 8 8 4 F .2 d1 2 6 7 , 1 2 7 0 - 7 1 ( 9 th C i r. 19 89 ) ( concl ud i ng thatno t i ce w as adequat e w here i tdesc ri bed the fa ctual s i tua t i on tha tw a s the ba s i s f orthe di s c i pl i na ryc ha r ge a nd a l e rt e d the pr i s one rof h is a lle g e d w r o n g d o in g ) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d i sm i ssed th e E i g h th A m en d m en tcl ai m b ecau se B urri s di d n otal l ege f

ac t s s ho w i ng thathe w as deni ed “ the m i ni m al ci vi l i ze d m ea sure of l i fe ’ s nec es si t i es , ” or thatdefe nd ant s a ct ed w i th d el i bera t e i nd i ff er ence to h is h e a lth o rs a f

e ty . Farm e rv . B r e nnan , 51 1 U . S . 82 5, 83 4 (19 94 ) ( i nt ernal q u o ta tio n m a rk s a n d c ita tio n o m itte d ) . B urri s’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-50921 Summary Calendar
GERARDO CERVANTES SOSA, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AM E R I CA; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND S ECURITY; BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN OF REEVES CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION III, Respondents-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CV-20
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gerardo Cervantes Sosa (Sosa), former federal prisoner # 33257-177, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition seeki n g removal of an immigration detainer and transfer to a facility where he could avail himself of early r elease programs. As Sosa has been released from Bureau of Prisons custody and removed to Mexico, we dismiss his appeal as moot

. See Calderon v. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Janu ary2, 201 3 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-50921 Document: 00512098547 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2013No. 10-50921

Moore , 518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996); Rock y v . K i ng, 900 F.2d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 1990). The appellees’ motion for an extension of time to fi l e an appellate brief therefore is denied as unnecessary. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

2 Case: 10-50921 Document: 00512098547 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,523
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          45,457
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            45,705
<LOANS>                                        119,174
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,282
<DEPOSITS>                                     157,563
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,517
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,966
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 180,282
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,137
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,413
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   147
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,697
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,564
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,133
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               60
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,125
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,125
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,539
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.12
<LOANS-NON>                                        252
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,750
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       45
<RECOVERIES>                                        58
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,878
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                50
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,828
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2476

To prohibit the Department of Defense from contracting with foreign

contractors for ship repair until a certification is made to Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1993

Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. HAMBURG, Mr. MILLER of

California, Mrs. UNSOELD, Mr. HUGHES, Mr. BROWN of California, and

Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To prohibit the Department of Defense from contracting

with foreign contractors for ship repair until a certification is made to Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Shipyard

5 Worker Protection Act’’.
2

•HR 2476 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CONTRACTS WITH FOREIGN CON2 TRACTORS FOR SHIP REPAIR.

3 (a) LIMITATION.—Section 7299a of title 10, United

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing new subsection:

6 ‘‘(d) The Secretary of the Navy may not enter into

7 a contract with a foreign nation or foreign firm for the

8 overhaul, repair, or maintenance of a naval vessel or any

9 other vessel (whether or not owned by the United States)

10 that operates under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of

11 the Navy unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the

12 Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House

13 of Representatives in advance that at least one of the fol14 lowing conditions exists:

15 ‘‘(1) The work was unplanned and is of an

16 emergency nature.

17 ‘‘(2) There is a compelling national security

18 reason for the work to be done by a foreign nation

19 or foreign firm.

20 ‘‘(3) There is a compelling economic reason for

21 the work to be done by a foreign nation or foreign

22 firm.’’.

23 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (d) of section 7299a

24 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection

25 (a), applies with respect to a contract for the overhaul,

26 repair, or maintenance of a naval vessel or any other vessel
3

•HR 2476 IH

1 (whether or not owned by the United States) that is oper2 ated under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy

3 that is entered into after the end of the 60-day period be4 ginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                       IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

                                  Exhibit 23.1

We consent to the use of our report dated February 1, 1999 with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule of 
Irvine Apartment Communities, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K 
of Irvine Apartment Communities, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
1, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and related
financial statement schedule of Irvine Apartment Communities, Inc., in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Irvine Apartment
Communities, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan for Directors, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Irvine Apartment Communities, Inc. 1993
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8)
pertaining to the Irvine Apartment Communities, Inc. 1996 Long-Term Stock
Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the
Irvine Apartment Communities, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment and Additional Cash
Investment Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) of Irvine
Apartment Communities, Inc. pertaining to the registration of $350,000,000 of
Debt Securities, Preferred Stock, Common Stock and Warrants.


Newport Beach, California
February 26, 1999
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      Salzman
                  Chief
      Executive Officer of Richman Tax
                  Credit
      Properties Inc., general partner of
                  Richman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
                  partner
      of the Registrant
                  November
      3, 2010
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
general partner of the Company
August 13, 2002