alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NOS. 02 - 14 - 00392 - CR 02 - 14 - 00393 - CR 02 - 14 - 00394 - CR

BROOKS L. BURTSON APPELLANT
V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT C OURT OF TARRANT COUN TY TRIAL COURT NO. 1340 778D, 1340779D, 1340 780D

------------ 

### ORDER

------------ We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Withdraw Anders Brief and to Extend Deadlines to Allow Filing of An Appellant’s Brief,” which we have construed as a motion for rehearing, and the State’s response. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.2 (stating that a motion will not be granted unless a response has been filed or requested by the court). It is the opinion of the court that the motion for re hearing should be and is hereby GRANTED

.2 We withdraw our June 25, 2015 memorandum opinion and judgment and order the appeals reinstated on the court’s docket. We further withdraw our order allowing appellant’s counsel to withdraw from the appeals and rei nstate him as appellant’s counsel for the duration of the appeals so that counsel can file a brief raising an arguable issue. Appellant’s brief on the merits is now due on or before Monday, August 17, 2015 . The State’s brief will be due 30 days later. The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the attorneys of record. SIGNED July 16, 2015

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE
PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         249,781
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,172,472
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,653,128
<ALLOWANCE>                                     66,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,458,036
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,146,036
<SHORT-TERM>                                   695,268
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             68,896
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     447,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,458,036
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 83,742
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,542
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   639
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               101,923
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              35,358
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,852
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           57,713
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 43,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,813
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      26,813
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                     34,221
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,820
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,672
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                67,488
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,668
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,781
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               66,601
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            66,601
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                           IWERKS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

                               Earnings Per Share
                    (in thousands except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                For the three months ended
                                                       September 30,


                                                  1997             1996
                                               -----------      -----------  
                                               (unaudited)      (unaudited)
<S>                                            <C>              <C> 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding   12,160,184       11,635,208


Common equivalent shares:
  Options and warrants                                   *          920,804
                                               -----------      -----------  

                                                12,160,184       12,556,012
                                               ===========      ===========

Net (loss) income                              $ (506,000)      $   174,000
                                               ===========      ===========


Net (loss) income per share                    $     (.04)      $       .01
                                               ===========      ===========
</TABLE> 

* These common equivalent shares were antidilutive.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2022

No. 04-20-00583-CV

Kevin DOTY and Elizabeth Doty,

Appellants

v.

Richard DAVIDSON and Javline Ranch (a General Partnership), a/k/a Javelin Ranch, a/k/a 

Javelin Ranch, LP,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-15-100

Honorable Leonel Alejandro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The appellees’ “Motion for Leave to File Surreply” is hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED January 13, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
#### Thomas P. YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant v. M. Travis BRAGG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-50448

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 2011.

Thomas P. Young, Anthony, NM, pro se.

Magdalena Gurany Jara, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Thomas Patrick Young, federal prisoner # 15382-075, is serving a 180-month aggregate sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a Schedule II controlled substance, money laundering, and being a felon in possession of a weapon. He appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the regulations used by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to determine an inmate’s eligibility date for transfer to a residential reentry center.

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” *Mosley v. Cozby,*813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). Young’s appeal was rendered moot by his pre-release transfer to a residential reentry center, and we therefore lack jurisdiction to consider it. *In re Scruggs,*392 F.3d 124, 128 (5th Cir.2004). Young’s motion to expedite the appeal is likewise DENIED as moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Current

# 2022-23

&Z&F&F   &A		

# 2021-22

&Z&F&F   &A		

# 2020-21

&Z&F&F   &A		

# 2019-20

&Z&F&F   &A		

# 2018-19

&Z&F&F   &A		

# 2017-18

# 2016-17

# 2015-16

# 2014-15

# 2013-14

# 2011-12

# 2010-11

# 2009-10

# 2008-9

# 2007-8

# 2006-7

# 2004-5

# 2002-3

# 2001-2

# image1.png
944 A.2d 754

#### Ex Rel John SINGLETON v. Sylvester JOHNSON, Police Commissioner, Philadelphia Police Department Appeal of: John Singleton.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 15, 2008.

Decided April 18, 2008.

Lester Roy Zipris, Esq., Ellen T. Greenlee, Esq., Karl Baker, Esq., Defender Association of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, for John Singleton.

Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Esq., Priya M. Travassos, Esq., Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

*468BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., and SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, and MCCAFFERY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed as having been IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
Exhibit
10.1


 





 


July
8, 2020


 


Dear
Mark:


 


This
letter memorializes our recent discussions regarding our collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its dramatic impact
on our community, our economy, and Ballantyne Strong, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


You
have voluntarily agreed, during the Specified Period (as defined below), to reduce your rate of base salary by 25%, from your
current rate of base salary of $250,000 (your “Regular Salary”) to a rate of base salary of $187,500 (your
“Reduced Salary”). The “Specified Period” shall mean the period commencing on July 1, 2020
and continuing until and including July 31, 2020.


 


For
the avoidance of doubt, the reduction from your Regular Salary to your Reduced Salary will not entitle you to any severance or
other payments or any other rights or be deemed to constitute a breach of the Company’s obligations to you under the executive
employment agreement between you and the Company dated November 6, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”) during
the Specified Period.


 


Except
as modified hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Please
indicate your agreement to the foregoing by your signature below.


 


Best
Regards,


 


BALLANTYNE
STRONG, INC.


 


	By:	/s/
    Todd R. Major	 
	Name:
    	Todd
    R. Major	 
	Title:
    	CFO	 


 


Acknowledged
and Agreed as of July 8, 2020:


 


	/s/
    Mark D. Roberson	 
	Mark
    D. Roberson
#### Joseph KIRZHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUREPOWER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-2285.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2014.

Decided: April 15, 2014.

*240Joseph Kirzhner, Appellant Pro Se. Jade Cobb Murray, Littler Mendelson PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Kirzhner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to PurePOWER Technologies LLC on his complaint asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Krizhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC,*No. 3:12-cv-01802-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Symbollon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack H.
Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005          /s/ Jack H. Kessler
                              -----------------------------------
                              Jack H. Kessler
                              Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey R. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of Franklin Credit Management
(the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 16, 2005

                                            BY: /s/ Jeffrey R. Johnson
                                                ----------------------
                                                Name:  Jeffrey R. Johnson
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 1, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00374

- CV

Adam REPOSA, Appellant

v.

Keith HENNEKE and David Escamilla,

Appellee s

From the 425th Judicial District Court, Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 1071

- C425 Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 2, 2019, we issued an order in which we informed appellant that the trial court

clerk filed a notification of late record stating that appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and that appellant is not entitled to preparation of the clerk’s record without paying the fee. In our July 2, 20 19 order, we directed appellant to provide written proof to this court that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the

clerk’s fee. Appellant ha s not responded to our order.

Additionally, on July 25, 2019, the court reporter filed a notification of late record stating that appellant failed to request a reporter’s record and also failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record and that appellant is not entitled to preparation of the reporter’s record without paying the fee.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court on or before August 6, 2019 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided with regard to the p ortion of this order regarding the clerk’s order, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 37.3(b); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).We additionally ORDER appellant to file written proof to this court on or befo r e August

12, 2019 that he has filed a designation of record with the court reporter. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b)(c). We further ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal wi thout paying the reporter’s

fee. If appellant fails to respond to the portion of this record regarding the reporter’s record within the time provided, the court will only consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a re porter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management; Notice of Establishment

    The Deputy Director of the National Science Foundation has 
determined that the establishment of the Advisory Committee for 
Cyberinfrastructure is necessary and in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the National 
Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 USC 1861 et seq. This determination 
follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure.
    Nature/Purpose: The Advisory Committee will be strictly advisory 
and will prepare a report to the National Science Foundation concerning 
the broad topic of advanced cyberinfrastructure and the existing 
Partnerships for Advanced Computational Infrastructure.
    Responsible NSF Official: Dr. Ruzena Bajcsy, Assistant Director, 
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1105, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-8900.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4159 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
SCHEDULE 1
                                 LIST OF ASSETS


1.    All right, title and interest of the Partnership in and to all loans
      receivable, accounts receivable, security deposits, rights of action, loan
      documents and collateral with respect to the aforementioned loans
      receivable.

2.    All proceeds from the sale of loans receivable, if any.

3.    All Bank accounts maintained by the Partnership.

4.    All furniture, fixtures and equipment owned or leased by the Partnership.

5.    All trademarks, trade names, copyrights, licenses etc.

6.    All rights and benefits under existing employment contracts, consulting
      agreements, broker agreements, service agreements and leases.


                                   SCHEDULE 2
                               LIST OF LIABILITIES

1.    All liabilities and obligations of the Partnership to the United States
      Small Business Administration arising any agreements with the United
      States Small Business Administration or otherwise incurred.

2.    All obligations of the Partnership to Sterling National Bank.

3.    All obligations of the Partnership pursuant to any employment contracts,
      consulting agreements, brokerage agreements, service contracts or leases.

4.    All accounts payable of the Partnership.
rom 973

(Rev. January 1985)

Corporation Claim for Deduction
for Consent Dividends

OMB No. 1545-0044

. Expires 7-31-87
Peabo Revetue gerne (Under Section 561 of the Internal Revenue Code.)
For tax year beginning +19 and ending +19
Name of corporation Employer identification number
Number and street, city, State and ZIP code
Number of shares ‘Number of shares a trltna wt
f b a 7 ie Actual distributions per
Class of stock outstanding on first outstanding on last Description of dividend rights 7
ay of taxyear day of taxyear ia en share made in tax year’

(Use more sheets if necessary.)

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice,

back of form.

Form 973 (Rev. 1-85)


Form 973 (Rev. 1-85)

Page 2

If any stock outstanding on the last day of the tax year is entitled to cumulative dividends, show the amount for earlier years unpaid at

the beginning of the tax year. Give the class or classes of stock involved.

(Use more sheets if necessary.)

Signature
Under penalties of perjury, | declare that | have examined this return, including any accompanying schedules and statements, and to

the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete.

Date Signature of off

Instructions

(Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code.)

Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.—We ask for this
information to carry out the Internal Revenue laws of the United
States. We need it to ensure that taxpayers are complying with
these laws and to allow us to figure and collect the right amount of
tax. You are required to give us this information.

Who Must File.—File Form 973 for a corporation that claims a
deduction for consent dividends under section 561.

How to File.—Attach Form 973 to the corporation's income
tax return for the tax year for which the deduction for consent
dividends is claimed. Also attach to the return the shareholders’
signed consents (Form 972, Consent of Shareholder To Include

Specific Amount in Gross Income). Each Form 972 filed by a
nonresident alien or a foreign corporation must also be
accompanied by payment of the amount that the corporation
would have been required to deduct and withhold under section
1441 or 1442, if the amount specified in such consent had been,
on the last day of the tax year of the corporation, paid in cash to
the shareholder as a dividend.

Signature.—Form 973 must be signed by the president, vice
president, treasurer, assistant treasurer, chief accounting
officer, or other corporate officer (such as tax officer) authorized
fo sign.
Exhibit
10.103
  AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
AND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENTS
 Amendment th Amendment Effective Date Franklin Asset Holding Lender Forbearance Agreement Amendment Loan Party Amendment Loan Parties
 Static Loan Borrowers FCMC Franklin Master
Agreement Static Loans
  Identified Forbearance Defaults




---



##### 



Extension of Forbearance for the Static Loans
 Forbearance
Date
 Conditions of Effectiveness
   Representations and Warranties




---



##### 



Ratification and Reaffirmation.
 Reference to and Effect on the Loan Documents
 Waiver and Release of All Claims and Defenses; Communications
 Claims




---



##### 



Communications
  No Waiver
 Waiver of Right to Trial by Jury
 Counterparts




---



##### 



Costs and Expenses
 Further Assurances
 Governing Law
 Headings
 Patriot Act Notice Act
 [Signature page follows.]




---



##### 



AMENDMENT LOAN PARTIES:FRANKLIN CREDIT ASSET CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Thomas J. AxonName:
    Thomas J. AxonTitle:
    President Address for Notices
 
 FRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Thomas J. AxonName:
    Thomas J. AxonTitle:
    President Address for Notices
  FLOW 2006 F CORP.By:
    /s/ Thomas J. AxonName:
    Thomas J. AxonTitle:
    President Address for Notices
  Signature Page to Amendment No. 3 to First Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Credit Agreements




---



##### 



FCMC 2006 M CORP.By:
    /s/ Thomas J. AxonName:
    Thomas J. AxonTitle:
    President Address for Notices
  FCMC 2006 K CORP.By:
    /s/ Thomas J. AxonName: Thomas J. AxonTitle:
    President Address for Notices
  Signature Page to Amendment No. 3 to First Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Credit Agreements




---



##### 



LENDER: THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANKBy:
    /s/ Alan D. SeitzName:
    Alan D. SeitzTitle:
    Senior Vice President Address for Notices
 
 With a copy to
 
 Signature Page to Amendment No. 3 to First Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Credit Agreements