alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vallia Carolyn FRIEND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-6139.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

*196Vallia Carolyn Friend, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vallia Carolyn Friend seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Friend has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2237 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2237

   To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to 
require that testimony before the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
                    Commission be given under oath.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 1993

 Mr. Boehlert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to 
require that testimony before the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
                    Commission be given under oath.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TESTIMONY BEFORE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT 
              COMMISSION.

    (a) Oaths Required.--Section 2903(d)(1) of the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-
510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ``All testimony before the Commission at a public hearing 
conducted under this paragraph shall be presented under oath.''.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this section 
shall apply with respect to all public hearings conducted by the 
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 2000
FIRST QUARTER 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,310
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              14
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   250
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     10,057
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         88,027
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,355
<DEPOSITS>                                      70,614
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,436
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,990
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 104,355
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,766
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  168
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     6
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,940
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 596
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 890
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,050
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    564
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         391
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       391
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.31
<LOANS-NON>                                         26
<LOANS-PAST>                                       168
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,055
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,062
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               630
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            432


</TABLE>
Corporate Passive Activity Loss and Credit Limitations OMB No. 1545-1091

Form 8810

© Attach to the corporation’s tax return (personal service

corporations and closely held corporations only). Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Name Employer identification number

2008 Passive Activity Loss

1a Current year income (from Worksheet 2, column (a)) 1a

1b

b Current year deductions and losses (from Worksheet 2,

column (b))

c 1c

d 1d

2

2

3

3

4

4

6 6

7 7

8

8

9 9

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 8810 (2008)

© See separate instructions.

Prior year unallowed losses (from Worksheet 2, column (c))

Combine lines 1a, 1b, and 1c. If the result is net income or zero, see instructions

Closely held corporations enter net active income and see instructions. Personal service 

corporations enter -0- on this line

Unallowed passive activity deductions and losses. Combine lines 1d and 2. If the

result is net income or zero, see the instructions for lines 1d and 3. Otherwise, go to

line 4

Total deductions and losses allowed. Add the income, if any, on lines 1a and 2 and 

enter the result (see instructions)

Prior year unallowed credits (from Worksheet 5, column (b))

Add lines 5a and 5b

Enter the tax attributable to net passive income and net active income (see instructions)

Unallowed passive activity credit. Subtract line 7 from line 6. If the result is zero or 

less, enter -0-

Allowed passive activity credit. Subtract line 8 from line 6 (see instructions)

2008 Passive Activity Credits

b

5a 5a

5b

Current year credits (from Worksheet 5, column (a))

( )

( )

Part I

Part II

Cat. No. 10356T

Part III Election To Increase Basis of Credit Property

10 If the corporation disposed of its entire interest in a passive activity or former passive activity in a fully taxable

transaction, and the corporation elects to increase the basis of credit property used in that activity by the unallowed 

credit that reduced the property’s basis, check this box (see instructions) ©

Name of passive activity disposed of ©

Description of the credit property for which the election is being made ©

Amount of unallowed credit that reduced the property’s basis © $

11

12

13

Caution: See the instructions and complete Worksheets 1 and 2 before completing Part I.

Caution: See the instructions and complete Worksheet 5 before completing Part II.

2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

LAWRENCE WHITE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 319 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of County Bank Corp on form 10-Q
     for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Curt Carter, Chief
     Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The Information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


     /s/ Curt Carter
     ---------------
     Curt Carter
     Chief Executive Officer
     May 12, 2003
#### IN RE KEYASHIA C.

*Rosemarie T. Weber,*in support of the petition.

*Susmita M. Mansukhani,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided June 2, 2010

The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 452 (AC 30297), is denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Letty MELLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7330.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 27, 2011.

Letty Mellor, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen John Pfleger, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Letty Mellor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prison*706er satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mellor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    161,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               311,803
<PP&E>                                         170,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 621,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           349
<OTHER-SE>                                     431,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   621,789
<SALES>                                      1,018,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,018,801
<CGS>                                          648,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  910,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,827
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-11465 on Form S-8 of our reportsdated March 16, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc. (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relatingto the Company’s adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, *Employers’Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - anamendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)* andSFAS No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*)and management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 16, 2007

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.3



                          Prestige Capital Corporation

                               AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

                                    Whereas:

Pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement accepted on May 12. 2006, (the
"Agreement"), Prestige Capital Corporation ("Prestige") has been factoring the
accounts receivable of SLS International, Inc. ("SLS");

The parties desire to continue their relationship upon modified terms;

Now it is hereby agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

      1.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in paragraph 3 of
            the Agreement, all funds received by Prestige from accounts not
            factored shall be wired to either SLS or its assigns (less any fees
            set forth below) within seventy-two (72) hours of receipt by
            Prestige, provided there are no outstanding chargebacks or disputes.

      2.    Seller shall pay Prestige an administrative fee equal to Three
            Quarters of One Percent (.75%) for all collections on non-factored
            accounts receivable.

      3.    In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in
            full force and effect.

      4.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth above, this
            amendment shall become null and void in the event the loan agreement
            between SLS and Capital Growth Asset Based Bridge Loan Fund II, LLC
            is not consummated.


Dated:   This 11th day of August, 2006



     SLS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By:  /s/ JOHN M. GOTT
     -----------------------------
     JOHN M. GOTT
     CEO



     PRESTIGE CAPITAL CORPORATION

By:  /s/ HARVEY L. KAMINSKI
     -----------------------------
     HARVEY L. KAMINSKI
     President/CEO
**EXHIBIT 3.3**

 

**ROYAL BODYCARE, INC.**

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE BYLAWS**

**Amendment No. 1**

**To the Bylaws of**

**Royal BodyCare, Inc.**

 

September 26, 2003 

 

The Bylaws, dated as of October 5, 1999 (the “Bylaws”), of Royal BodyCare, Inc., aNevada corporation (the “Company”) are hereby amended as follows: 

 

**1.***********Section 3.9**************is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:*

 

**Section 3.9****REGULAR MEETINGS. .**At least two regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held each year on such day and at such time and place as shall from time to time be determined by the Board of Directors 

 

**2.*******Section 4.3**********is herebyamended to read in its entirety as follows:*

 

**Section 4.3****AUTHORITY.** Each committee, to the extent, and only to the extent, expressly provided in the resolution of the Board of Directors establishing such committee, shall have and may exercise all of theauthority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation except to the extent expressly restricted by statute, the Articles of Incorporation or these Bylaws. 

 

**3.*******Section8.7**********is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:*

 

**Section 8.7****TRANSACTIONSWITH DIRECTORSANDOFFICERS**.**** No contract or other transaction between the Corporation and any other corporation and no other act of the Corporation shall, in the absence of fraud, be invalidated or in any way affected by thefact that any of the directors of the Corporation are pecuniarily or otherwise interested in such contract, transaction or other act, or are directors or officers of such other corporation. Any director of the Corporation, individually, or any firmor corporation of which any such director may be a member, may be a party to, or may be pecuniarily or otherwise interested in, any contract or transaction of the Corporation; provided, however, that the fact the director,individually, or the firm or corporation is so interested shall be disclosed or shall have been known to each member of the Board of Directors prior to any annual meeting or any special meeting of the Board of Directors at which action upon anycontract or transaction shall be taken. Any director of the Corporation who is so interested may be counted in determining the existence of a quorum at any such annual or special meeting of the Board of Directors which authorizes such contract ortransaction, but may not vote thereat to authorize such contract or transaction. Every director of the Corporation is hereby relieved from any disability which might otherwise prevent him from carrying out transactions with or contracting with theCorporation for the benefit of himself or any firm, corporation, trust or organization in which or with which he may be in anywise interested or connected.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2223

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin

Street in Dallas, Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street

5 in Dallas, Texas, is designated as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith

6 Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 2223 RFS

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

3 map, or other paper of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

5 the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.