alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,780
<OTHER-SE>                                     (48,780)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                       Exhibit 3
                                                                       ---------

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

     I, LARRY G. DENNISTON, Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary of BSB
BANCORP, INC., do hereby certify that the following is a true and correct copy
of a Resolution adopted at a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of said
company duly convened and held on April 23, 1999, at which meeting a quorum was
present and voting throughout and that such Resolution is in full force and
effect.


        WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board of Directors to provide that a
     shareholder may elect to vote its proxy at any annual meeting of the
     Company, in any matter permitted by Delaware law;

        NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Article II, Section 2.10 is hereby
     amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

        PROXIES:  A shareholder may vote in person or by proxy executed in
     writing by the shareholder or his or her duly authorized attorney-in-fact.
     A shareholder may also authorize another person or persons to act for such
     shareholder as proxy (a) by transmitting or authorizing the transmission of
     a telegram, cablegram, or other means of electronic transmission to the
     person who will be the holder of the proxy or to a proxy solicitation firm,
     proxy support service organization or like agent duly authorized by the
     person who will be the holder of the proxy to receive such transmission,
     provided that any such telegram, cablegram or other means of electronic
     transmission must either set forth or be submitted with information from
     which it can be determined that the telegraph, cablegram or other
     electronic transmission was authorized by the shareholder, or (b) as
     otherwise permitted by law. No proxy shall be valid after eleven months
     from the date of its execution, unless otherwise provided in the proxy.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of April,
1999.

                                   /s/ Larry G. Denniston
                                   ----------------------
                                   Senior Vice President and
                                   Corporate Secretary
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Mark Jessee, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American RetirementVillas Properties II, A California Partnership; 

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operationof internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: May 17, 2004
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2527

To forgive the repayment to the Government of advance deficiency payments

received by producers who are prevented from planting a crop due to

damaging weather or related condition.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 24, 1993

Mr. MINGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Agriculture

A BILL

To forgive the repayment to the Government of advance

deficiency payments received by producers who are prevented from planting a crop due to damaging weather

or related condition.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That effective only for the 1993 crops of wheat, feed

4 grains, upland cotton, and rice, sections 114(a)(2) (G),

5 (H), and (I) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C.

6 1445j(a)(2) (G), (H), and (I)) shall not apply to any ad7 vance deficiency payment made to a producer with respect

8 to that portion of the crop that is prevented from being
2

HR 2527 IH

1 planted due to damaging weather or related condition, as

2 such terms are defined in section 2251 of the Food, Agri3 culture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C.

4 1401 note).

Æ
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

November 21, 2012 

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

ANNOUNCES A RELAXATION OF HARDSHIP WITHDRAWAL 

RULES TO HELP VICTIMS OF HURRICANE SANDY 

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) announced today 

that it has made temporary changes to the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) hardship withdrawal rules to 

help victims of Hurricane Sandy pursuant to the guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service 

on November 16. 

Beginning today, the TSP will treat any Financial Hardship In-Service Withdrawal Request 

(Form TSP-76) received until January 25, 2013 as qualifying for a hardship withdrawal if the 

participant writes “Hurricane Sandy” at the top of the form and checks the block on the form for 

personal casualty. The distributions must occur before February 1, 2013 to qualify for this 

treatment. 

The participant should write Hurricane Sandy at the top of the form and check the “personal 

casualty” box on the TSP-76. The TSP will then waive the rule that prohibits a participant from 

making employee contributions for 6 months after taking a hardship withdrawal. This will allow 

an employee to continue to make contributions to the TSP and receive the employer match (if 

eligible). These temporary changes will not be effective retroactively. For more information, 

please go to https://www.tsp.gov/whatsnew/plan/planNews.shtml.

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it 

is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private 

employers. As of October 2012, TSP assets totaled approximately 

$324.1 billion, and retirement savings accounts were being 

maintained for roughly 4.6 million TSP participants. 

Participants include Federal civilian employees in all branches 

of Government, employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members 

of the uniformed services. Additional information can be found 

at www.tsp.gov. 
2

MEDIA CONTACT: 

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641 

(end)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oscar EDGARDO-GUILLEN, also known as Cabo, also known as Jose Francisco Castillo, also known as Jose Francisco Castellon, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50473

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 2, 2014.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Victor Arturo Arana, Law Office of Fag-erberg & Arana, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Oscar Edgardo-Guillen appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine. He was sentenced to 188 months of imprisonment and four years of supervised release. He contends that the district court erroneously calculated the guidelines range. The Government responds that his claims of error are barred by his appeal waiver.

Edgardo-Guillen does not acknowledge the existence of the appeal waiver much less challenge its validity on appeal. A review of the record indicates that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence, *see United States v. Portillo,*18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir.1994), and that his claims of error regarding the calculation of the guidelines range are barred by the appeal waiver.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. Counsel is WARNED that the filing of an appeal contrary to an appeal waiver is a needless waste of resources and could result in sanctions. *See United States v. Gaitan,*171 F.3d 222, 224 (5th Cir.1999).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of W W Capital Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve
D. Zamzow, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, based
on my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


         Dated:  May 13, 2003           By: /s/ Steve D. Zamzow
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steve D. Zamzow, President and CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1012

In re: ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(3:07-cr-00154-JAG-3)

Submitted: March 29, 2015 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Day, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roger Day, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, citing 28 

U.S.C. § 455 (2012) and alleging bias on the part of the district 

court judge. He seeks an order from this court directing the 

district court judge to recuse himself. We find the present record 

does not warrant an order requiring the district court judge to 

recuse himself. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
This form accompanies method submissions and is used by laboratories supporting state MPI programs to inform U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food 

Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of new or revised methods. For revised methods, a description of the changes assists FSIS in efficiently 

evaluating “at least equal to” status of the revised method.

 DATE OF SUBMISSION

 SUBMITTER'S NAME SUBMITTER'S PHONE NUMBER

 STATE PROGRAM LABORATORY NAME

 METHOD TITLE

 METHOD REVISION 

 IF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED BUT REVISED, LIST OF CHANGES TO METHOD: 

 Please reference the section of the document that contains revisions.

 

 Directions for completing this form: Complete all questions. Remember to include section references along with each procedural change listed. 

 

 Submit the completed form electronically to: 

 * When submitting the form please include 

 the supported state name in the subject of the e-mail. 

US Department of Agriculture 

Food Safety Inspection Service 

Office of Public Health Science

 FSIS FORM 5720-15 (04/03/2017) Page 1 of 1

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it 

displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0583-0170. The time required to complete this information collection is 

estimated to average 25 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and 

completing and reviewing the collection of information.

Laboratory Method Notification Form
943 A.2d 263

#### CITY OF BRADFORD, Respondent, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 110, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 26, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Com*354monwealth Court is REVERSED. The matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court to remand to the Court of Common Pleas of McKean County for consideration of *Westmoreland Intermediate Unit*# *7 v. Westmoreland Intermediate Unit*# *7 Classroom Assistants Educational Support Personnel Association, PSEA/NEA,*939 A.2d 855 (2007).

Jurisdiction relinquished.
House Calendar No. 82

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2555

[Report No. 103–229]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 100

‘‘Potter Stewart United States Courthouse’’.East Fifth Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, as the

SEPTEMBER 9, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 82

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2555

[Report No. 103–229]

To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in

Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1993

Mr. PORTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

SEPTEMBER 9, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth

Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United

States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 100 East Fifth

5 Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 2555 RH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States

6 Courthouse’’.
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 West Virginia State Events
 Section Topics
     West Virginia Home
     County Offices
     County PCP Data
     Daily LDP Rates
     Programs
     Newsletters
     State Events
     State News Releases
     Resources
 State Executive Director John D. Perdue  Read John D. Perdue'
 State Office Address 1550 Earl L Core Rd.
Morgantown, WV26505(304) 284-4800
(855) 854-3076
 2022 Calendar of Events DateEvent InformationLocationContact / AttendanceNo Scheduled Events Persons with disabilities who require accommodations to attend or participate in this meeting/event/function should contact the TDD Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 before the event date.
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
#### Todd GLASSEY, petitioner, v. AMANO CORPORATION, et al.

No. 08-1088.

May 4, 2009.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.