alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SCHERING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and Berlex Laboratories Inc., Defendants, Schering-Plough Corporation, Additional Defendant on the Counterclaim.

Civ. A. No. 82-1392 (CSF).

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

Nov. 22, 1988.

Milgram, Thomajan & Lee, P.C. by Alfred T. Lee, New York City, for plaintiff.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore by Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., New York City, for defendants.

ORDER ON CONSENT

CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.

WHEREAS this Court filed an Opinion on August 28, 1987, and an Order thereon granting plaintiff permanent injunctive relief; and

WHEREAS the Court filed a final judgment on October 30, 1987; and

WHEREAS the Court filed an Order on January 19, 1988, denying defendants’ mo*530tion for reconsideration and for a new trial; and

WHEREAS defendants on February 17, 1988, filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from each and every part of the Final Judgment and the January 19, 1988, Order; and

WHEREAS the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 870 F.2d 652 has remanded the case to this Court for the limited purpose of the entry of the within Order on Consent; and

WHEREAS the parties executed a Settlement Agreement on September 21, 1988, finally resolving all matters in dispute in this litigation, conditioned upon this Court vacating the final judgment and all prior orders entered in this action, and dismissing the claims and counterclaims, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

> (a) the Final Judgment of this Court and all prior Orders entered in this action are vacated and set aside and shall be of no force or effect; and

> (b) the complaint and counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
#### BLACKMON v. REID, Adm’x.

No. 25965.

Dec. 18, 1934.

*123Morrill & Snodgrass and L. B. Yates, for plaintiff in error.

L. A. Pelley and W. C. Austin, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

On *the 27th*day of April, 1934, tbe plaintiff obtained a judgment in tbe district court, and on October 26, 1934, tbe proceedings in this court were commenced by tbe filing of a purported transcript of the record with petition in error attached. The record does not show that a motion for new trial was filed and passed upon, although the purported transcript contains a copy of a motion for new trial. The same is no part of the record and cannot be reviewed by this court except upon proper presentation in a case-made or by bill of exceptions. Chase v. Byrnes, 147 Okla. 118, 294 P. 786; In re Welfelt’s Estate, 142 Okla. 110, 285 P. 843; Brigham v. Davis, 126 Okla. 90, 258 P. 740: Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk, 35 Okla. 439, 130 P. 138; Richardson v. Beidleman, 33 Okla. 463, 126 P. 818.

It does not appear anywhere in the record that a notice of appeal was ever given in open court at the time of the rendition of the judgment, the order of the court overruling the motion for new trial or within 10 days thereafter, and in the absence of proper notice of appeal this court is without jurisdiction to review the action of the trial court. Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285, 27 P. (2d) 631. The appeal is therefore dismissed.
**Exhibit 13.1**

** **

**906CERTIFICATION**

** **

The certification setforth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) for the purposeof complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Ignacio Antoñanzas A.,the Chief Executive Officer and Alfredo Ergas S., the Chief Financial Officerof ENERSIS S.A., each certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.               the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.               the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Enersis.

 

 

Date: June 8, 2009.

 

 
|   | /s/ Ignacio Antoñanzas A.   |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Name: Ignacio Antoñanzas A. |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer         |

 

 
|   | /s/ Alfredo Ergas S.    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name: Alfredo Ergas S.  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
OFFlCE OFTHEATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

February 13, 1939 

Bon. 3. E. Whltmore 

Lfvestook Ssnftary Commission 

304 :v* T. Taggoner Building 

Fort Korth, Texas 

hlr a?. Fllitnore: 

as to whether funds 

018 1456 has b 

the stat\lte 

may be oxpen 

ZXatutes, llmLti3 

n collected under 

, ..iediciue C:, Surgery 

:;rovidcs that tko funds 

essary esynaes of t>e 

all be applied to cozpentha Revised Civil Statutes proera1 district and oountp attorState nhnll file and prOmcut 

prooecding 13 the nama of the 

vlolatlons tixreof on requsst of 

any member of said Doard." 

This article makes the prosecutions of violations of the Vetorlnarg Sdical Zraotlce Act the eaprens 
Hon. J. E. %hit?nore, February 13, 1939, Page 2 

duty of the various county and distriot attorneys of 

this state. 

Ax%iole 7461 relates to the renewal of licenses and in the eveot the license Is oat renewed within 

sixty dnys after expiration, the applicant nust then 

take the examination as required by the Hoard. In that 

event, the examlnotion fee would be controlled by Artiole 7456 and it is our opfnion that the expenditure of 

the $1.00 license fee is controlled by the purposes 

prescribed In Artiole 7456. 

It Is the opinion of this Department t&t you 

would not have authority to expend funds collected fro3 

ronerral of licenses to make invastig>tiono, file ch~~rges 

and meke prosecutions for violation of the Veterinary 

Mcdioal Practice Act. 

Very truly yours 

ATTORRZT GMXR.!LL OF TEXAS 

APPROVED: 

ATTOR;~Z"Y GEXZRAL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RANDERS
KILLAM GROUP INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                  1,380
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          14,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,036
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       44,225
<PP&E>                                                 16,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         88,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  14,918
<BONDS>                                                   716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    3
<OTHER-SE>                                             70,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           88,290
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       36,622
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          27,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       15,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           52
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         75
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (12,092)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (12,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (12,483)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.49)


</TABLE>
2014-0635.

#### State v. Browder.

Cuyahoga App. No. 99727, 2014-Ohio-113. On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2294 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2294

  To designate the Federal building in Wichita Falls, Texas, which is 
 currently known as the Main Post Office, as the ``Graham B. Purcell, 
                Jr., Post Office and Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1993

Mr. Sarpalius introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal building in Wichita Falls, Texas, which is 
 currently known as the Main Post Office, as the ``Graham B. Purcell, 
                Jr., Post Office and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Main Post Office facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1000 Lamar Street, Wichita Falls, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Graham B. Purcell, Jr., Post Office and Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Graham B. Purcell, 
Jr., Post Office and Federal Building''.

                                 <all>
```
Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board’s

HR Quick Reference Sheet 

Welcome! The Office of Resource Management’s Human Resources Division is 

committed to helping you have a smooth transition to the FRTIB. Listed below are 

some suggestions to ensure you get off to a great start.

Important Deadlines: If you are new to working for the Federal government or are returning 

after a break in service, remember you have 31 days to enroll in the Federal Employees' 

Group Life Insurance Program (FEGLI) and 60 days to select a health insurance, dental 

and/or vision plan. 

Town Center / Agency Sharepoint: Get acquainted with this page which is located on your 

desktop. Some of the frequently used links on the Town Center include the FRTIB telephone 

directory, electronic Official Personnel File (eOPF), Quick Time and Employee Express. 

Important Emails: Once you have been entered into our HR database (FPPS), you will 

receive emails from the following systems and programs: 

Electronic Official Personnel File (eOPF) - https://eopf.opm.gov/frtib/– this system 

contains electronic copies of the documents that make up your Official Personnel 

Folder. The tool allows you to electronically view and print your OPF documents. The 

email you receive from eOPF will provide detailed information as well as logon 

instructions. 

Employee Express - https://www.employeeexpress.gov/ – this system contains your 

payroll-personnel information. You will use this system to change or view your address, 

tax withholdings, health coverage, direct deposit, financial allotments, Leave and 

Earnings statement, and more... The email you receive will provide you with your 

Employee Express WEB Password along with specific logon instructions. 

First FRTIB Leave and Earnings Statement (LES): Your LES is equivalent to a pay 

stub. All employees are encouraged to look at their first FRTIB LES to ensure it is 

accurate. Contact HR immediately if you identify any discrepancies or erroneous information. 

Prior Military Service: If you have prior military service, please contact April Rudolph about 

the Military Buy Back program. 

***Transfering Employees***

It typically takes two to three pay periods after we receive your SF 1150 from your prior 

agency before your annual and sick leave balances appear correctly on your LES and in 

QuickTime. However, if you will need to take leave sooner, please provide HR with a copy of 

your last LES from your previous agency so we may expedite the process. 

If you are an FSA enrollee or have vision and/or dental coverage, you must notify each

benefit of your change in agency. HR will not be able to change update this information on 

your behalf. 

If you have a TSP loan, please provide us with the loan account number, type of loan, and 

the loan amount you pay each pay period.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,090,324
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,816,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,719,587
<INVENTORY>                                     51,726,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,100,056
<PP&E>                                          68,331,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,528,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,566,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,987,390
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        36,849,127
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,270,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,566,233
<SALES>                                         37,657,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,657,959
<CGS>                                           37,623,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,623,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (3,126,127)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,867,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,024,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,024,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,024,824)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.24)
        


</TABLE>
946 A.2d 103

#### Michael FORBES, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 30, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.1

1

. This Court offers no comment concerning the Commonwealth Court's determination that all challenges to sentencing aggregation proceed in mandamus as opposed to habeas corpus, *see Forbes v. PBPP,*931 A.2d 88, 91 (Pa.Cmwllh.2007), since such question has not been pursued by either party in the present appeal. This disposition is limited to the availability of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus, implicated by a clear right to relief in the form of the performance of ministerial duties required of the government, and only in the absence of any other adequate and appropriate remedies. *See Seeton v. Pa. Game Comm'n,*594 Pa. 563, 937 A.2d 1028, 1033 (2007).
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2425

To amend title 18, United States Code, to double the enhanced penalties

for carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence

or drug trafficking crime.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1993

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to double the enhanced penalties for carrying a firearm during and in

relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Penalty Enhance5 ment Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2425 IH

1 SEC. 2. DOUBLING OF ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR CARRY2 ING A FIREARM DURING AND IN RELATION

3 TO A CRIME OF VIOLENCE OR DRUG TRAF4 FICKING CRIME.

5 Section 924(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘five’’ and inserting ‘‘10’’;

8 (2) by striking ‘‘ten’’ and inserting ‘‘20’’;

9 (3) by striking ‘‘thirty’’ and inserting ‘‘60’’; and

10 (4) by striking ‘‘twenty’’ and inserting ‘‘40’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
United Investors Income Properties 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000830056
<NAME> UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                             772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          12,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,097   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,959   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,838    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,959    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   449    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   316    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       135     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.19<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
exv10w5



 





EXHIBIT 10.5




AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT

 AMENDMENT NUMBER 8




     This AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER 8 (“Amendment”) is made
as of the 30 day of June, 2006, by and among PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC., a corporation formed
under the laws of the State of Delaware (“Borrower”) and MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY
(“Agent”), a New York banking corporation, with offices at 255 East Avenue, Rochester, New York
14604 as administrative agent for the Lenders, and each of the LENDERS (as defined in the Agreement
described below).



     This Amendment amends the Amended and Restated Credit Facility Agreement (“Credit Agreement”)
dated as of August 3, 2005 made between Borrower, the Agent, and the Lenders described therein, as
previously amended by Amendment Number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.



     1. The definition of “Bridge Loan Maturity Date” contained in Section 1.1 of the Credit
Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:



“Bridge Loans Maturity Date” means August 4, 2006.




     5. In connection with this Amendment the Borrower agrees to pay to the Bank an amendment fee
of $10,000 as well as the Bank’s legal fees in connection herewith.



     6. All other terms of the Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



     7. Borrower represents and warrants that no Event of Default, or event that with the giving of
notice or the passage of time or both would constitute an Event of Default, under the Credit
Agreement has occurred and is continuing.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY,	 	 
	as Administrative Agent	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John C. Morsch	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	John C. Morsch	 	 
	 

	 	Administrative Vice President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	PHOENIX FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Kenneth Wolf	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	CFO
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

[USCG-2001-8893]


Commercial Fishing Industry Vessel Advisory Committee; Charter 
Renewal

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Transportation has renewed the charter for 
the Commercial Fishing Industry Vessel Advisory Committee (CFIVAC) for 
2 years from December 10, 2000 until December 10, 2002. CFIVAC is a 
Federal advisory committee under 5 U.S.C. App. 2. It advises the Coast 
Guard on the safety of the commercial fishing industry.

ADDRESSES: You may request a copy of the charter by writing to 
Commandant (G-MOC-3), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 Second Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20593-0001; by calling 202-267-0507; or by faxing 202-
267-0506. This notice and the charter are available on the Internet at 
http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Captain Jon Sarubbi, Executive 
Director of CFIVAC, or Lieutenant Jennifer Williams, Assistant to the 
Executive Director, telephone 202-267-0507, fax 202-267-0506.

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
Joseph J. Angelo,
Director of Standards.
[FR Doc. 01-4551 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M