alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re: Richard J. CASTALDO, Jr., Debtor, Richard J. Castaldo, Jr., Debtor-Appellant, v. The Bank of New York, as Trustee Under the Pooling & Servicing Agreement Dated as of November 30, 1995, Series 1995-C, Creditor-Appellee, and Jeffrey L. Sapir, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee.

No. 07-1840-bk.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2008.

*352Richard J. Castaldo, Jr., pro se.

Lisa Milas, Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates, Plainview, NY, for Creditor-Appel-lee.

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, ROBERT D. SACK, and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

On Appeal from the Judgment, entered April 2, 2007, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, *Judge),*which dismissed: (1) the debtor-appellant’s appeal from a December 15, 2006 order denying his motion to renew or reargue his objections to a proof of claim filed by creditor-appellee The Bank of New York, and (2) his appeal from a dismissal order, entered December 21, 2006, both of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Morris, *Bankruptcy Judge).*

The facts relevant to the debtor-appellant’s claims, with which we assume the parties’ familiarity, are most fully set forth in the memorandum decision, dated Dec. 7, 2006, of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. *See In re Castaldo,*2006 WL 3531459 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y. Dec.7, 2006).

The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s holding that the debtor-appellant’s challenge to the proof of claim filed by creditor-appellant The Bank of New York was barred by the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine. We review this decision de novo. *See Hoblock v. Albany Co. Bd. of Elections,*422 F.3d 77, 83 (2d Cir. 2005). The doctrine bars federal court review of claims brought by “state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the [federal] court proceedings commenced and inviting [federal] court review and rejection of those judgments.” *Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp.,*544 U.S. 280, 284, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005). The doctrine clearly applies to this case where the debtor-appellant challenges a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale obtained by the creditor-appellee from New York State Court for Orange County. Thus, we affirm the district court’s holding in this regard.

The district court also upheld the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of the debtor-appellant’s case due to his failure to follow a specific direction of that court to file an amended Chapter 13 reorganization plan. We review this dismissal pursuant to a clearly erroneous standard, *see, In re CTC 9th Ave. P’ship,*113 F.3d 1304, 1312 *353(2d Cir.1997), and we again find no reason to disturb the district court’s holding because Castaldo’s appeal was clearly untimely.

For the reasons stated above, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 4.32

 



[LOGO]


    




 










[LOGO]


    




 










 • , • 


    




 










In witness   whereof, this Letter Agreement has been entered into on the date and year   first above written. For and on behalf of Bharti lnfratel Limited Name: Tit!   : Name: Title: For and on behalf of Nettle Infrastructure Investments Limited   Name: Title: [Signature Page] 


    




 










For and on   behalf of AI-Amin Investments Limited For and on behalf of Asian   Telecommunication Investments (Mauritius) Limited For and on behalf of CCII   (Mauritius), Inc. -e A (-) . VC(_,., 11\. ,· D \.r.e c_ {-ev For and on   behalf ofEuro Pacific Securities Ltd [Signature Page] 


    




 










For and on   behalf ofVodafone Telecommunications (India) Limited G .A .   UCl""-V\.te._k \:::::. rec:--!-o v r-k_ For and on behalf of   Mobilvest For and on behalf of Prime Metals Ltd For and on behalf of Trans   Crystal Ltd [Signature Page] 


    




 










[LOGO]


    




 










[LOGO]


    




 










[LOGO]


    




 










[LOGO]


    




 










[LOGO]
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4342]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EG01-42-000]


PSEG Fossil LLC; Notice of Amended and Restated Application for 
Commission Redetermination of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

February 15, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 19, 2001, PSEG Fossil LLC (PSEG Fossil) 
tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) an amended and restated application for redetermination of 
exempt wholesale generator status.
    Any person desiring to be heard concerning the amended and restated 
application for exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion 
to intervene or comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214). The Commission will limit its consideration of 
comments to those that concern the adequacy or accuracy of the amended 
and restated application. All such motions and comments should be filed 
on or before March 1, 2001, and must be served on the applicant. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection or on the internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (please call (202) 208-2222 for assistance). Comments 
and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of 
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4342 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Travon Walker, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00080

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 18

- F

- 0897

- 005 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Ju stice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. W e note that the appellant, Travon Walker, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 16, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### JAMES G. *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

The petitioner James G.’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 829 (AC 29407), is denied.

*923
      *Minor G. Sterling,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Rita M. Shair,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided July 8, 2010
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2318

To redesignate the Federal building located at 380 Trapelo Road in Waltham,

Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Frederick C. Murphy Federal Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. STUDDS, Mr. OLVER, Mr.

MEEHAN, Mr. TORKILDSEN, Mr. BLUTE, and Mr. MONTGOMERY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public

Works and Transportation

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 380 Trapelo

Road in Waltham, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Frederick C.

Murphy Federal Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 380 Trapelo Road

5 in Waltham, Massachusetts, and known as the Waltham

6 Federal Center, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Frederick C. Murphy Federal Center’’.
2

•HR 2318 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Frederick C. Murphy Federal Center’’.

Æ
Exhibit
10.2


[SILICON VALLEY BANK
LETTERHEAD]


 


August 11, 2006


3D Systems Corporation

26081 Avenue Hall

Valencia, California 91355


	
   

  	
  Re:

  	
  Silicon Valley Bank (“Bank”)/3D Systems, Inc. and 3D
  Systems

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Corporation (each a “Borrower” and collectively, the
  “Borrowers”)

  



 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Reference is hereby made to that certain Loan and
Security Agreement dated as of June 30, 2004 between Borrowers, on the one hand
and Bank, on the other hand (as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated July 22, 2005
and Amendment No. 2, dated march 30, 2006, and as may be further amended from
time to time, the “Loan Agreement”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in
this letter (“Waiver Letter”) shall have the meanings given to them in the Loan
Agreement, unless otherwise defined hereunder.


An Event of Default has occurred under Section
8.2(a) of the Loan Agreement as a result of Borrowers’ violation of Section
6.8(iii) of the Loan Agreement for the reporting period ending June 30,
2006 (the “EBITDA Default”). Subject to the terms and conditions herein, Bank
hereby agrees to waive the EBITDA Default, solely for the reporting period
ending June 30, 2006, upon receipt of a waiver fee from Borrowers in the amount
of $5,000.


The waiver set forth herein shall be effective only in
this specific instance and for the specific purposes set forth herein. Such
waiver does not allow for any other or further departure from the terms and
conditions of the Loan Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, which terms
and conditions shall remain in full force and effect. This Waiver Letter may
not be deemed to prejudice any right or remedy which Bank may now have or may
have in the future under and in connection with the Loan Agreement or any Loan
Document.









 



Please acknowledge your receipt of this Waiver Letter
and acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions by signing and dating the
enclosed counterpart of this waiver letter.


	
  

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  SILICON VALLEY BANK

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Relationship Manager

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  8/11/06

  



 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


3D SYSTEMS, INC.


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  VP & CFO

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  8/11/06

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  VP & CFO

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  8/11/06
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael Y. McGovern, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the“registrant”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005   /s/ Michael Y. McGovern   Michael Y. McGovern  President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Mark Meriwether, CEO, President, Secretary/Treasurer
and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Dated: 8/21/2006                         /s/Mark Meriwether
                                         -------------------------
                                         President
                                         CEO
                                         Secretary
                                         Treasurer
                                         Director
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 225

To clarify the tax treatment of certain disability benefits received by former

police officers or firefighters.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mrs. KENNELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To clarify the tax treatment of certain disability benefits

received by former police officers or firefighters.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN DISABILITY BENE4 FITS RECEIVED BY FORMER POLICE OFFI5 CERS OR FIREFIGHTERS.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—For purposes of determining

7 whether any amount to which this section applies is ex8 cludable from gross income under section 104(a)(1) of the

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the following conditions
2

•HR 225 IH

1 shall be treated as personal injuries or sickness in the

2 course of employment:

3 (1) Heart disease.

4 (2) Hypertension.

5 (b) AMOUNTS TO WHICH SECTION APPLIES.—This

6 section shall apply to any amount—

7 (1) which is payable to an individual (or to the

8 survivors of an individual) who was a full-time em9 ployee of any police department or fire department

10 which is organized and operated by a State, by any

11 political subdivision thereof, or by any agency or in12 strumentality of a State or political subdivision

13 thereof; and

14 (2) which is received in calendar year 1989,

15 1990, or 1991.

16 For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘‘State’’

17 includes the District of Columbia.

18 (c) WAIVER OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—If, on

19 the date of the enactment of this Act (or at any time with20 in the 1-year period beginning on such date of enactment)

21 credit or refund of any overpayment of tax resulting from

22 the provisions of this section is barred by any law or rule

23 of law, credit or refund of such overpayment shall, never24 theless, be allowed or made if claim therefore is filed be25 fore the date 1 year after such date of enactment.
3

•HR 225 IH

Æ
Order entered March 4, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01555-CR

No. 05-13-01556-CR

No. 05-13-01557-CR

THOMAS COREA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-00737-Y, F13-00406-Y, F13-00407-Y

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the clerk’s and reporter’s records because of ineffective counsel, indigence, 

or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeals, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment 

of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is 

indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to 

assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the 
trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has 

abandoned the appeals.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

 The trial court shall next determine the date by which the clerk’s records will be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeals 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION IN THE FORM PROVIDED BY

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Philip W. RoizinPhilip W. RoizinExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration,Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: August 15, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,849
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,550
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          51,407
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            50,856
<LOANS>                                        139,852
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,717
<DEPOSITS>                                     185,840
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,244
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,932
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 211,717
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,949
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,399
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   148
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,496
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,029
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,030
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,466
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,084
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,084
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,558
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     6.6
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,354
<LOANS-PAST>                                        11
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,913
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50
<RECOVERIES>                                        44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,026
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,026
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>