alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Aleshire, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Aleshire,*118 Ohio St.3d 1213, 2008-Ohio-2700.]

(No. 2007-1865

Submitted May 6, 2008

Decided June 11, 2008.)

Kenneth W. Oswalt, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Lonny J. Aleshire Jr., pro se.

{¶ 1} Appellee has filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order reversing the judgment of the court of appeals on the authority of *State v. Sarkozy,*117 Ohio St.3d 86, 2008-Ohio-509, 881 N.E.2d 1224, and remanding the cause to the trial court for retrial.

{¶ 2} The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The order in this cause filed on March 26, 2008, reported at 117 Ohio St.3d 402, 2008-Ohio-1272, 884 N.E.2d 57, is vacated. This cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in *State v. Sarkozy.*

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Cupp, J., would vacate the prior order and dismiss the cause as having been improvidently accepted.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
[No. 22799-5-III.

Division Three.

August 14, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Thomas Daniels, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 03-1-03059-8, Maryann C. Moreno, J., entered February 9, *2004.Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Kulik, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARTHA A. DELGADO,

 

 Appellant,

v.

JOSE LUIS DELGADO,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00163-CV

Appeal from the

388th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2015DCM5202)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until February 23, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Marlene Gonzalez, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 23, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of January, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2294

To designate the Federal building in Wichita Falls, Texas, which is currently

known as the Main Post Office, as the ‘‘Graham B. Purcell, Jr., Post

Office and Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1993

Mr. SARPALIUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To designate the Federal building in Wichita Falls, Texas,

which is currently known as the Main Post Office, as

the ‘‘Graham B. Purcell, Jr., Post Office and Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Main Post Office facility of the United States

5 Postal Service located at 1000 Lamar Street, Wichita

6 Falls, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Gra7 ham B. Purcell, Jr., Post Office and Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 2294 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Graham B. Purcell, Jr., Post Office

6 and Federal Building’’.

Æ
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF EVERGREEN ENERGY INC.

KFx
Technology, LLC*a Delaware limited liability company

Evergreen
Operations, LLC*a Delaware limited liability company.

Landrica
Development Companya South Dakota company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

Buckeye
Industrial Mining Co.a Ohio company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

KFx
Plant, LLCa Wyoming limited liability company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

KFx
Operations, LLCa Wyoming limited liability company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

Evergreen
Energy International, LLC*a Delaware limited liability company.

Evergreen
Energy Asia Pacific Corpa Delaware company 96% owned by Evergreen Energy International, LLC

Evergreen
Energy Asia Corporationa Japanese company 100% owned by Evergreen Energy Inc.

C-Lock
Technology, Inc.a Delaware company 84% owned by Evergreen Energy Inc.

---

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Mark Meriwether, CEO, President, Secretary/Treasurer
and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

Dated: 5/18/2005                         /s/Mark Meriwether
                                         -------------------------
                                         President
                                         CEO
                                         Treasurer
                                         Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 2, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                    (D. Michael Manies, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1.  Winter Trust of 12/3/1974*; Ottawa, Kansas, and Peoples, Inc., Colorado Springs, Colorado; to acquire Peoples Mortgage Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado, and thereby engage in mortgage lending activities, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 12, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-3896 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2347 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2347

To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation for employment 
  in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel MYSTIQUE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1993

  Mr. Blute introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation for employment 
  in the coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel MYSTIQUE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883) and 
section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of the 
department in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue a 
certificate of documentation for employment in the coastwise trade of 
the United States for the vessel MYSTIQUE, United States official 
number 921194.

                                 <all>
```
1

Filed 6/17/14 P. v. Dixon CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

QUARAN KEITH DIXON,

Defendant and Appellant.

C074328

(Super. Ct. No. 12F07872)

Appointed counsel for defendant Quaran Keith Dixon has asked this court to 

review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no errors, we shall affirm the 

judgment.

BACKGROUND

In November, 2012, victim Betty Rhinehart, 84 years old, was gardening when she 

encountered defendant in her garage. He held her at gunpoint and demanded money. 

When she refused, he pushed her to the floor, hit and kicked her, and put the gun in her 
2

mouth. He took her inside the house, ripped out the alarm, put her in a closet, and stole 

property, including jewelry. Five days later, the sheriff’s department responded to a call 

of a prowler at another home and caught defendant when he ran. Near where he was 

caught, officers found a .38-caliber revolver and clothing. Defendant was on juvenile 

searchable probation. A search of his home revealed several pieces of Rhinehart’s 

jewelry. 

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to first degree robbery 

(Pen. Code, § 211)1 and admitted he had personally used a firearm in the commission of 

the robbery (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)). The remaining counts and enhancements, as well as 

his pending juvenile case, were dismissed. Prior to sentencing, defendant moved to 

withdraw his plea and the trial court denied the motion. The trial court then sentenced 

defendant to the negotiated term of four years on the robbery and 10 years for the 

personal use gun enhancement. The trial court awarded defendant 208 days of 

presentence custody credits, and ordered defendant to pay $391 in restitution as well as 

various fines and fees. Defendant did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.

DISCUSSION

Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this 

court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. 

(Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defendant of his right to file a 

supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 

days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having 

undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would 

result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

 

1

 Further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

 DUARTE , J.

We concur:

 BLEASE , Acting P. J.

 ROBIE , J.
[No. 33954-4-II.

Division Two.

September 11, 2007.]

#### *In the Matter of the Custody of*Z.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 04-3-02681-3, John A. McCarthy, J., entered September 16, 2005. *Remanded*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
#### Jackie RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cecilia R. REYNOLDS, Warden; Jon Ozmint, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 10-7374.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 27, 2011.

Jackie Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jackie Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recom*709mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Richardson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### JOSEPH ABREU *v.*KARISSA LEONE

*Tushar G. Shah,*in support of the petition.

*John E. Tucker,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided July 14, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 390 (AC 28880), is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Exhibit 23.2








CONSENT OF EXPERT





I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-125362, No. 333-134296, No. 333-141321 and No. 333-147547) and Form S-8 (No. 333-142848) of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) of the findings in my report, Projections
of Groundwater Impacts in Response to Proposed Pumping from Beneath the Tule Desert in Southeastern Nevada Using MODFLOW-2000, dated June 24, 2008, with respect to the estimated availability of groundwater in the Tule Desert Groundwater Basin appearing in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Tule Desert Groundwater Basin and Impairment of Water Assets” in the “Water Resource and Water Storage
Operations” section of the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. I hereby consent to all references to such report in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and I hereby consent to all references to such report in each such Registration Statement, and further consent to being named as an expert in each such Registration Statement and in each Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement
relates.











Signed:/s/ Peter A. Mock


Peter A. Mock, Ph.D., R.G., P.H.





Paradise Valley, Arizona


November 5, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                     /s/ William J. Ryan
                                     -------------------
                                 Name: William J. Ryan
                                 Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                     Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

I certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LabOne, Inc.

 

LabOne, Inc.

Date:  August 6, 2004
By  /s/ *John W. McCarty*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          32,741
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    224,729
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          24,422
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            25,302
<LOANS>                                      1,003,346
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,306,330
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,100,266
<SHORT-TERM>                                    81,999
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,169
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,306,330
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 65,449
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,738
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                78,187
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              35,226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,755
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           39,432
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    7,726
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,300
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 21,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,209
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,209
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.74
<LOANS-NON>                                     14,286
<LOANS-PAST>                                       204
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,065
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    6,469
<RECOVERIES>                                       838
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,160
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,160
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


Independent Accountants' Review Report

The Board of Directors
Iwerks Entertainment, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet
of Iwerks Entertainment, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997, and the
related unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three-
month and nine-month periods ended March, 1997 and 1996, and the unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended
March 31, 1997 and 1996.  These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be
performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Iwerks Entertainment, Inc. as of
June 30, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended not presented
herein and in our report dated August 2, 1996 we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of June 30, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


April 28, 1997


                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP