alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1

List of Principal Subsidiaries



|                                                       |  |              |  |                  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------ |  | -----------------
|Subsidiaries.                                          |  | Jurisdiction |  | Short Name       
|                                                       |  |             
|Ampla Energia e Serviços S.A.                          |  | Brazil       |  | Ampla            
|Centrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.              |  | Brazil       |  | Cachoeira Dourada
|Central Costanera S.A.                                 |  | Argentina    |  | Costanera        
|Central Dock Sud S.A.                                  |  | Argentina    |  | Dock Sud         
|Central Geradora Termelétrica Fortaleza S.A.           |  | Brazil       |  | Fortaleza        
|Chilectra S.A.                                         |  | Chile        |  | Chilectra        
|Codensa S.A. E.S.P.                                    |  | Colombia     |  | Codensa          
|Companhia de Interconexão Energética S.A.              |  | Brazil       |  | CIEN             
|Compañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.                       |  | Chile        |  | Celta            
|Companhía Energética de Ceará S.A.                     |  | Brazil       |  | Coelce           
|Edegel S.A.A.                                          |  | Peru         |  | Edegel           
|Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.                                     |  | Colombia     |  | Emgesa           
|Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A. |  | Peru         |  | Edelnor          
|Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.                         |  | Argentina    |  | Edesur           
|Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.                       |  | Chile        |  | Pehuenche        
|Empresa Eléctrica de Piura S.A.                        |  | Peru         |  | EEPSA            
|Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.                  |  | Chile        |  | Endesa Chile     
|Enel Brasil S.A.                                       |  | Brazil       |  | Enel Brasil      
|Hidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.                          |  | Argentina    |  | El Chocón        
|GasAtacama S.A.                                        |  | Chile        |  | GasAtacama
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 26 
          - [TD 8912] 
          - RIN 1545-AX08 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to final regulations that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Wednesday, December 20, 2000 (65 FR 79735) relating to the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax imposed under chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue Code.                     

# DATES:

This correction is effective December 20, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James F. Hogan (202) 622-3090 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final regulations that are the subject of this correction are under section 2601 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, the final regulations contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 8912), that were the subject of FR Doc. 00-31757, is corrected as follows: 

§ 26.2601-1 

                        On page 79740, column 2, § 26.2601-1, paragraph (b)(4)(i)(E),                         *Example 9.*, line 6, the language “is to pass to the                         *A*                        's issue, per stirpes. Under” is corrected to read “is to pass to                         *A*                        's issue, per stirpes. Under”.                     

Cynthia E. Grigsby, 

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and Strategic Planning). 

[FR Doc. 01-4292 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EX-10.20





 Exhibit 10.20 

AMENDMENT NO. 5 
 TO

 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2013 STOCK OPTION PLAN 

WHEREAS, the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Option Plan, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1-4 (as amended, the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company have determined it in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan pursuant to
Section 13 thereof to provide for an additional number of Shares (as defined in the Plan) currently available under the Plan. 
 NOW
THEREFORE, effective as of the date approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Plan. 


  

	 	2.	 Stock Subject to the Plan. The second sentence of Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended and
restated in its entirety to reflect the increase in available options to read as follows: 


 “Subject to the
provisions of Section 12 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon exercise of such Options is Eighty Five Thousand Five Hundred Forty Seven (85,547) Shares.” 

Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

This Amendment has been adopted by the Board of Directors and the Majority Shareholder as of August 16, 2016.
Franklin Credit Holding Corporation 10-Q


Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Credit Holding Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Axon, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










U/s/ Thomas J. Axon


Thomas J. Axon


President (Principal Executive Officer)


August 15, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Franklin Credit Holding Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JT/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS CORREA RODRIGUEZ;

FIDELA MARIA MARTINEZ,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-72652

Agency Nos. A097-361-223

 A097-361-224

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Correa Rodriguez and Fidela Maria Martinez, natives and citizens

of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

DEC 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JT/Research 2 06-72652

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. INS, 295

F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002), and review de novo claims of constitutional

violations in immigration proceedings, Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir.

2001). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence

presented with the motion to reopen was insufficient to warrant reopening. See

Singh, 295 F.3d at 1039 (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only

if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”). It follows that petitioners’ due

process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000)

(requiring error for a petitioner to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Competitive Supplemental Funds For Comprehensive 
STD Prevention Systems: Monitoring STD Prevalence and Reproductive 
Health Services For Adolescent Women in Special Settings

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.

    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Competitive Supplemental Funds For 
Comprehensive STD Prevention Systems: Monitoring STD Prevalence and 
Reproductive Health Services For Adolescent Women in Special 
Settings, Program Announcement #99000-K, meeting.
    Times and Date: 9 a.m.-9:30 a.m., March 8, 2001 (Open).
    9:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., March 8, 2001 (Closed).
    Place: National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, 8 
Corporate Square Blvd, Conference Room 1A, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Deputy Director for 
Program Management, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
Program Announcement #99000-K.
    Contact Person for More Information: Elizabeth A. Wolfe, 
Prevention Support Office, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB 
Prevention, CDC, Corporate Square Office Park, 8 Corporate Square 
Boulevard, M/S E07, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, telephone 404/639-8025.

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention CDC.
[FR Doc. 01-4364 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
## In t he

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 23

- 00150

- CR

BRANDON JOREL SCOTT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 28958

Before S tevens , C.J., van Cleef and Rambin , JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

B randon Jo rel Scott pled guilty to the fraud u lent use or possession of identifying

information

. 1 Pursuant to a plea bargain with the State, Sc ott was se ntenced to five years’

imprisonment. 2 The trial court certified that this was a plea

- bargain case and that Scott had no

right of appeal; nonetheless, Scott , acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that

we are wi thout jurisdicti on over th is case because of Scott’s plea bargain with the State, we

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea

- bargain cases.

Rule 2 5.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure detai ls tha t right as follows:

(2) . . . . In a plea bargain case

— that is, a case in which a defendant’s

plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the

punishment recomm ended by the p rosecutor and agreed to by the defe ndant

— a

defenda nt may a ppeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on

before trial,

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal , or

(C) where the spe cific appeal is expressly authorized by statute

.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2) . There is no indication in the record before this Court that Scott met

any of these requirements . To the contrary, the trial court’s certification of Scott’s right of

appeal in dicates that he has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texa s Rules of

1 T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN

. § 32.51(c)( 2) (Supp.)

.

2 In conjunction with the plea agreement, Scott waived his right of appeal.3

Appellate Procedure, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s

certification indicates no right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).

We i nformed Scott of this apparent def ect in our jurisd iction over his appeal and afforded

him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. Scott did not respond to our

letter.

Because Scott has no right of appeal as a result of his plea bar gain with the State and

because th e trial court’s c ertificatio n correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jeff Rambin

Justice

Date Submitted: October 3, 2023

Date Dec ided: October 4, 2023

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Thomas Grant II, certify that: 

1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc.; 

2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors; 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: August 14, 2003
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
W. Thomas Grant II, Chairman of the Board,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         351,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  593,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,060,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,274,847
<PP&E>                                       2,963,679
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,052,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,998,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,876,624
<BONDS>                                        357,984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,862
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,750,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,998,679
<SALES>                                     24,966,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,966,037
<CGS>                                        6,062,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,062,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                720,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                   215,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            505,082
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   505,082
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1011-001]


Redbud Energy LP; Notice of Filing

February 15, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 7, 2001, Redbud Energy LP (Redbud) 
tendered for filing a revised Electric Rate Tariff FERC No. 1 submitted 
in connection with its January 19, 2001 filing seeking market rate 
authority. The revisions are in compliance with the requirements of 
Order No. 614.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before February 28, 2001. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4346 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M