alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ghassen Moncef Ben YOUNES, AKA Ghassen Ben Younes, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-71824.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 14, 2014.

Christopher John Stender, Esquire, Federal Immigration Counselors, Inc., APC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Theodore Charles Hirt, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: BENAVIDES,** TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Fortunato P. Benavides, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

Ghassen Ben Younes (‘Younes”), a native and citizen of Tunisia, petitions for review of the final order of removal entered against him by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The order dismissed his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the *511Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the agency’s legal determinations de novo, and factual findings for substantial evidence. *Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

Younes has not shown that he was persecuted in the past and does not demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution that is both subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable. *Duarte de Guinac v. INS,*179 F.3d 1156, 1159 (9th Cir.1999). Younes has failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he will be persecuted were he to return to Tunisia. *Id.;*8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(2). Likewise, Younes has failed to bring evidence showing that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured should he return to Tunisia. *Lanza v. Ashcroft,*389 F.3d 917, 936 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### HUDSON MOTOR LODGE, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued March 8, 1995

Decided March 31, 1995.

*179Before Judges KING, D’ANNUNZIO and EICHEN.

*William J. Sitar*argued the cause for appellant *(Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum,*attorneys; *Steven R. Irwin,*of counsel; *Mr. Sitar,*on the brief).

*Michael Kremen,*Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for respondent *(Sean M. Connelly,*Corporation Counsel; *Mr. Kremen,*of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from real property assessments, the taxpayer violated *R.*8:6-l(b)(l)(ii). The rule requires that, in cases where no pretrial conference is held, a copy of the appraisal report of an evaluation expert must be furnished an adversary ten days prior to the date of trial. In the present case, the taxpayer’s expert’s report was provided on the day of trial. The City moved to suppress the report and the expert’s testimony and the court, noting that this was the second preemptory trial listing for the case, the third listing overall, granted the motion. In the absence of proof to support the taxpayer’s challenge to the assessment, judgment was entered in favor of the City. Thereafter, the court denied the taxpayer’s motion for reconsideration.

The taxpayer appeals and we affirm. We perceive no basis to interfere with the trial court’s discretion in this matter. It was the second preemptory trial listing and the taxpayer’s violation of the rule was egregious. Moreover, no adequate explanation for the default was provided by the taxpayer on the original trial date or in the documents submitted in support of the taxpayer’s motion for reconsideration.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2497

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the

deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals

and to increase the deduction to 100 percent of such costs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1993

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently

extend the deduction for the health insurance costs of

self-employed individuals and to increase the deduction

to 100 percent of such costs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FULL DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE

4 COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS.

5 (a) DEDUCTION MADE PERMANENT.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (l) of section 162

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

8 special rules for health insurance costs of self-em-
2

•HR 2497 IH

1 ployed individuals) is amended by striking paragraph

2 (6).

3 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a)

4 of section 110 of the Tax Extension Act of 1991 is

5 amended by striking paragraph (2).

6 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

7 by this subsection shall apply to taxable years end8 ing after June 30, 1992.

9 (b) DEDUCTION INCREASED TO 100 PERCENT.—

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section

11 162(l) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘25 per12 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘100 percent’’.

13 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

14 by paragraph (1) shall apply to taxable years begin15 ning after December 31, 1993.

Æ
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   FY2016 Justification              

#   FY2016 Justification

##           Downloads        

FMSHRC FY2016 CBJ.pdf

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: (202)434-9900TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 22, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128768 Michael F. Cavanagh 

(100) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, TERI ROHDE, BRENDON QUILTER, MARY Justices QUILTER, WALTER MACKEY, BARBARA 

MACKEY, GARY GIBSON, ELLEN GIBSON, 

TED JUNGKUNTZ, LOISE JUNGKUNTZ, 

DAVID SPONSELLER, MARY SPONSELLER, 

MIKE GLADIEUX, MARTHA GLADIEUX, 

HELEN RYSSE, TERRY TROMBLEY, JOHN 

WILLIAMS, and THERESE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 128768 

 COA: 253565 

Washtenaw CC: 03-001046-CZ 

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS a/k/a PUBLIC 

SCHOOLS OF THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR,

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ANN ARBOR 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS, PRESIDENT OF THE 

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ANN ARBOR 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS, and TREASURER OF THE 

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ANN ARBOR 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

ANN ARBOR EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, 

MEA/NEA, 

 Intervening Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for clarification of order granting leave to 

appeal is considered, and it is GRANTED. The Court is not granting leave to appeal on 

Issue II in the application for leave to appeal. 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 22, 2006 

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lois A. Toth, Treasurer of Capital Directions, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2003 which this accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
Capital Directions, Inc.

|                  |  |                       
|----------------- |  | ----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2003 |  | /s/ Lois A. Toth      
|                  |  |                       
|                  |  | Lois A. Toth
Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Capital Directions, Inc. and will be retained by Capital
Directions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

20
#### Marion L. SHERROD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Superintendent KORNEGAY; Ms. Shea-rin, Trust Fund Account Supervisor; Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Ap-pellees.

No. 14-6227.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

Marion L. Sherrod, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marion L. Sherrod appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Sherrod v. Komegay,*No. 5:13-ct-03196-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-40-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

February 15, 2001.
    An informal settlement conference will be held in the above docket 
regarding the Kansas ad valorem tax refund issues in the proceedings 
involving the Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company system. The conference 
will be held on February 23, 2001, at the Kansas City Airport Marriott, 
775 Brasilia, Kansas City, Missouri. The conference will be held from 8 
a.m. to 5 p.m. For questions concerning the conference, please call 
Deborah Osborne, Dispute Resolution Service. Her telephone number is 
202-208-0831 and her e-mail address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#523637303d20333a7c3d21303d203c3712343720317c3437367c2721"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="107475727f6271783e7f63727f627e7550767562733e7675743e6563">[email protected]</span></a>. All 
interested parties in the above-referenced docket are requested to 
attend.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4341 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.16





 Exhibit 10.16 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO

 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2013 STOCK OPTION PLAN 

WHEREAS, the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the board of directors and the
shareholders of the Company have determined it in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 13 thereof to provide for an additional number of Shares (as defined in the Plan) currently available under the Plan. 

NOW THEREFORE, effective as of the date approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Plan. 


  

	 	2.	 Stock Subject to the Plan. The second sentence of Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended and
restated in its entirety to reflect the Stock Split and the increase in available options to read as follows: 



“Subject to the provisions of Section 12 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon exercise of
such Options is Fifty Three Thousand Four Hundred Twenty Nine (53,429) Shares.” 
 Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and
conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 This Amendment has been adopted by the Board of Directors and the majority
stockholder of the Company as of May 1, 2015.
SCHEDULE O Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership OMB No. 1545-1668

(Form 8865)

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service  Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

Name of transferor Filer’s identifying number

(b)

Number of

items

transferred

Type of

property

(a)

Date of

transfer

(d)

Cost or other

basis

(e)

Section 704(c)

allocation

method

(c)

Fair market

value on date

of transfer

Marketable

securities

Inventory

Tangible

property

used in trade

or business

Intangible

property

Other

property

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25909U Schedule O (Form 8865) 2004

Transfers Reportable Under Section 6038B

(f)

Gain

recognized on

transfer

(g)

Percentage interest

in partnership after

transfer

Name of foreign partnership

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions):

(c)

Date of

disposition

(a)

Type of

property

(b)

Date of

original

transfer

(e)

Gain

recognized by

partnership

(f)

Depreciation

recapture

recognized

by partnership

(d)

Manner of

disposition

Dispositions Reportable Under Section 6038B

(g)

Gain allocated

to partner

(h)

Depreciation

recapture allocated

to partner

(under section 6038B)

Is any transfer reported on this schedule subject to gain recognition under section 904(f)(3) or

section 904(f)(5)(F)?  Yes No

Part III

Part I

Part II

Cash

2004
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2555

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth

Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United

States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 100 East Fifth

5 Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 2555 RFS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States

6 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Transmittal of Employer’s Annual OMB No. 1545-0714

Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027-T

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

© For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see

the Instructions for Form 8027.

Employer’s name Employer identification number

Type or print employer’s

name, address, and

employer identification

number as shown on

Form 941.

Number and street (or P.O. box number, if mail is not delivered to street address.) Number of accompanying Forms 8027

City or town, state, and ZIP code

File Form 8027-T along with accompanying Forms

8027 with the Internal Revenue Service,

Cincinnati, OH 45999 by February 28, 2007.

Use Form 8027-T to send Forms 8027 to the

Internal Revenue Service Center if you have more

than one establishment for which you have to file

Form 8027.

Cat. No. 61006A Form 8027-T (2006)

Apt. or suite no.

2006
EXHIBIT
10.1


 


WRITTEN
CONSENT OF DIRECTORS.


TO
CORPORATE ACTION WITHOUT MEETING 


OF
PHI GROUP, INC.


 



The
undersigned, Tam Bui, Henry Fahman, and Frank Hawkins are the only members of, and, therefore, constitute the Board of Directors
of PHI GROUP, INC., a corporation originally incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 08, 1982 and domesticated in the State
of Wyoming on September 20, 2017 (the “Company”), and by their signatures below, hereby approve the following resolutions
and consent to their adoption, in lieu of a meeting on this 29th day of June 2020.


 


WHEREAS,
on September 20, 2017 the Company filed the “Foreign Profit Corporation Articles of Domestication” with the Secretary
of State of Wyoming to redomicile the Company according to the laws of Wyoming, ID Number 2017-000769478;


 


WHEREAS,
it deems to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to maintain its corporate registration with the State
of Wyoming to reduce costs and burden;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Company file a Certificate of Dissolution with the Nevada Secretary of State to cease
its corporate registration and dissolve the Company in the State of Nevada, effective June 18, 2020.


 


FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Company maintain its corporate registration with the State of Wyoming and operate as a Wyoming corporation
henceforth.


 


FURTHER
RESOLVED that in addition to and without limiting the foregoing, each officer of the Company be and hereby is authorized and
directed to take, or cause to be taken, such further action, and to execute and deliver, or cause to be delivered, for and in
the name and on behalf of the Company, all such instruments and documents as such officer may deem necessary, appropriate or in
the best interests of the Company to effectuate the intent of the foregoing resolutions and the transactions contemplated thereby
(as conclusively evidenced by the taking of such actions or the execution and delivery of such instruments and documents, as the
case may be) and all action heretofore taken by such officer in connection with the subject of the foregoing recitals and resolutions
be, and it hereby is, approved, ratified and confirmed in all respects as the act and deed of the Company.


 


By
their signatures below, the above resolutions have been duly authorized and adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors.


 


Dated:
June 29, 2020


 


	/s/
    Tam Bui		/s/
    Henry D. Fahman
	Tam Bui, Director	 	Henry D. Fahman, Director
	 	 	 
	/s/
    Frank Hawkins	 	 
	Frank Hawkins, Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

      ( print page 11607)    
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Computer-Communications Research (1192).                    

*Date:*                         March 19, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m.-6 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rm. 1150, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mukesh Singhal, Program Director, Operating Systems & Compilers (OSC), CISE/CCR, Room 1145 National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8912.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Operating Systems & Compilers proposals as a part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information, financial data, such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under (4) and (6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 20, 2001.

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-4560  Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M