Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 2001 / Notices 11571

Interstate Natural Gas Transportation Services,

Order No. 637, 65 Fed. Reg. 10156 (February 25,

2000), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,091 (February

9, 2000), Order No. 637–A, 65 Fed. Reg. 35705 (June

5, 2000), III FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 21,099 (May 19,

2000), Order No. 637–B, 92 FERC ¶ 61,062 (2000).

Egan Hub Partners, L.P. states that it

served copies of the filing on all

customers and interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest in this

proceeding with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20426, in

accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214).

All such motions to intervene or protest

should be filed on or before March 7,

2001. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of these filings are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may be viewed on the web at

http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm

(call 202–208–2222 for assistance).

Comments and protests may be filed

electronically via the internet in lieu of

paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)

and the instructions on the

Commission’s web site at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–4577 Filed 2–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. PR01–6–000]

Enogex, Inc; Notice of Petition for Rate

Approval

February 21, 2001.

Take notice that on January 23, 2001,

Enogex, Inc. (Enogex) filed a petition for

rate approval, pursuant to section

284.123(b)(2) of the Commission’s

regulations, to change the manner in

which it charges for fuel use on its

system. Enogex proposes to include a

new definition of ‘‘System Fuel’’ in the

statement of operating conditions; to

institute a fuel tracker and to priceadjust the annual fuel tracker to account

for fuel on a value equivalent basis; to

make the mainline transmission fuel

retention percentage applicable to the

transportation of all gas received and

delivered on Enogex’s mainline

transmission system, including receipts

and deliveries of gas that is first

compressed and dehydrated on

Enogex’s low pressure gathering

systems.

Pursuant to section 284.123(b)(2)(ii) of

the Commission’s regulations, if the

Commission does not act within 150

days of the Petition’s filing date, the

rates proposed therein will be deemed

to be fair and equitable and not in

excess of an amount that interstate

pipelines would be permitted to charge

for similar services. The Commission

may, prior to the expiration of the 150-

day period, extend the time for action or

institute a proceeding.

Any person desiring to participate in

this rate proceeding must file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with rules 211 and

214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 385.214). All motions must be filed

with the Secretary of the Commission

on or before March 8, 2001. This

petition for rate approval is on file with

the Commission and is available for

public inspection. This filing may be

viewed on the web at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

Comments and protests may be filed

electronically via the internet in lieu of

paper. See, 18 CFR 385.200(a)(1)(iii) and

the instruction on the Commission’s

web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us.efi/

doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–4637 Filed 2–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket Nos. GP91–8–012; GP91–10–012]

Jack J. Grynberg, Individual and as

General Partner for the Greater Green

River Basin Drilling Program: 72–73 v.

Rocky Mountain Natural Gas

Company, a Division of K N Energy

Inc.; Rocky Mountain Natural Gas

Company, a Division of K N Energy

Inc. v. Jack J. Grynberg, Individually

and as General Partner for the Greater

Green River Basin Drilling Program:

72–73; Notice of Refund Report

February 21, 2001.

Take notice that on December 21,

2000, Jack J. Grynberg (Grynberg)

tendered for filing a Refund Report

reflecting refunds due under the

Commission’s November 21, 2000

‘‘Order Denying Rehearing and on

Compliance Filing’’ (November 2000

Order) issued in the captioned

proceedings. In addition, pursuant to

Ordering Paragraph (C) of the November

2000 Order, Grynberg stated he

transmitted a check for $597,107.97 to

Questar Pipeline Company (Questar).

Grynberg submitted his refund report

and made payment to Questar without

prejudice to his ability to seek judicial

review of the November 2000 Order and

the recovery of amounts paid, with

interest, if the November 2000 Order is

reversed and no refunds are required.

The refund report documents the

ceiling price applicable under the

Natural Gas Act and Natural Gas Policy

Act of 1978 for each of the four wells

for which refunds are due, and the

formula used to calculate such refunds.

Pursuant to the November 2000 Order,

refunds were calculated only for sales

prior to July 26, 1989. The amount paid

Questar reflects total refunds due with

interest through December 21, 2000,

subject to a reduction for uncollectible

royalties previously paid to the

Colorado State Board of Line

Commissioners (CSB) and to the U.S.

Department of the Interior, Minerals

Management Service (MMS). The

royalties attributable to the CSB totaled

$6,611 and to the MMS totaled $78,690.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations, should file on or before

March 4, 2001. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

11572 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 38 / Monday, February 26, 2001 / Notices

protestants parties to the proceedings.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room. This filing may be viewed on the

web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/

rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance). Comments and protests may

be filed electronically via the internet in

lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission’s web site at http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–4636 Filed 2–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

Notice of Application for Amendment

of License and Soliciting Comments,

Motions To Intervene, and Protests

February 20, 2001.

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric application has been filed

with the Commission and is available

for public inspection:

a. Application Type: Amendment of

License.

b. Project No.: 1388–032.

c. Date Filed: January 12, 2000 and

November 9, 2000.

d. Applicant: Southern California

Edison Company (SCE).

e. Name of Project: Lee Vining

Hydroelectric Project.

f. Location: On Lee Vining Creek in

Mono County, California near the town

of Lee Vining. The project is located

within the Inyo National Forest.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

h. Applicant’s Contact: Stephen E.

Pickett, 2244 Walnut Grove Ave.,

Rosemead, CA 91770, (626) 302–4459.

i. FERC Contact: Any questions on

this notice should be addressed to Doan

Pham at (202) 219–2851 or e-mail

address doan.pham@ferc.fed.us.

j. Deadline for filing comments,

motions to intervene, or protests: April

2, 2001.

All documents (original and eight

copies) should be filed with: David P.

Boergers, Secretary, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426.

Comments and protests may be filed

electronically via the internet in lieu of

paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)

and the instructions on the

Commission’s web site at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Please include the Project Number

(1388–032) on any comments, protests,

or motions filed.

k. Description of Amendment: SCE

filed an application to reflect changes in

transmission line and related facilities.

SCE proposes to remove the 6.4-mile

transmission line (located within 30.02

acres of federal lands), extending from

the Poole powerhouse to the Lee Vining

Substation from the project boundary,

because they are part of SCE’s

interconnected system. In addition, SCE

proposes to reduce the boundary line to

remove the following features (located

within 88.00 acres of federal lands) from

the project: (1) A state highway around

Rhinedollar Lake, (2) telephone line, (3)

the Rhinedollar 12-kV distribution line.

SCE also proposes to add about 0.46

acres of federal lands to the project

boundary due to the addition of a gaging

station and associated conduit

downstream of the powerhouse.

l. Locations of the Application: A

copy of the application is available for

inspection and reproduction at the

Commission’s Public Reference Room,

located at 888 First Street, NE., Room

2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling

(202) 208–1371. This filing may be

viewed on http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call (202) 208–2222 for

assistance). A copy is also available for

inspection and reproduction at the

addresses in item h above.

m. Individuals desiring to be included

on the Commission’s mailing list should

so indicate by writing to the Secretary

of the Commission.

Comments, Protests, or Motions to

Intervene—Anyone may submit

comments, a protest, or a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214.

In determining the appropriate action to

take, the Commission will consider all

protests or other comments filed, but

only those who file a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any comments,

protests, or motions to intervene must

be received on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application.

Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents—Any filings must bear in

all capital letters the title ‘‘Comments’’,

‘‘Recommendations for Terms and

Conditions’’, ‘‘Protest’’, or ‘‘Motion to

Intervene’’, as applicable, and the

Project Number of the particular

application to which the filing refers.

Any of the above-named documents

must be filed by providing the original

and the number of copies provided by

the Commission’s regulations to: The

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any

motion to intervene must also be served

upon each representative of the

Applicant specified in the particular

application.

Agency Comments—Federal, state,

and local agencies are invited to file

comments on the described application.

A copy of the application may be

obtained by agencies directly from the

Applicant. If an agency does not file

comments within the time specified for

filing comments, it will be presumed to

have no comments. One copy of an

agency’s comments must also be sent to

the Applicant’s representatives.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–4584 Filed 2–23–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket Nos. RP01–4–003]

Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc.;

Notice of Compliance Filing

February 21, 2001.

Take notice that on February 14, 2001,

Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc.

(MIT) tendered for filing as part of its

FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, the following tariff

sheets, with an effective date of

November 1, 2001:

Third Revised Sheet No. 83

First Revised Sheet No. 83C

Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 84

Substitute Original Sheet No. 85A

Substitute Original Sheet No. 85B

Substitute Original Sheet No. 85C, and

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 86

MIT states that the filing is being

made to correct certain pagination and

typographical errors that were found in

MIT’s previous tariff filings in these

proceedings. As mandated by Order No.

587–L, the revised tariff sheets are to be

effective as of November 1, 2000.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed in accordance with section 154.210

of the Commission’s Regulations.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to