alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-88,159-01 AND WR-88,159-02
EX P ARTE P ERCY DONNELL WILL IAMS, Appli cant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 27735 A-1 AND 27737 A- 1 IN THE 278T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM WALK

ER COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Arti cl e 1 1
. 0 7 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmit t ed t o t h i s Court these applications for writs of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burg lary of a building a

nd burg lary

of a ha bitation, and he wa s sentence d to concur rent terms in prison. The re
wer e no dire ct appe als. Applicant raises sever al claims in his habea s applicat i o n s , including claims of ineffe ctive assistance of trial counsel, and he has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Strickland
v. W a shington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.-2-

1999); Lafler v

. Cooper , 132 S.Ct
. 1376 (2012); Missouri v. Frye , 132 S.Ct
. 1399 (2012). There is
no response from counsel in the rec ord provided to this Court, and there are no finding s from the trial court. In these circumstance s, additional fact s ar e n eede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond t o Ap p l i ca n t ’s claims of ineffe ctive assistance by explaining counsel’s repr esentation of Applicant, including ap p l icable strategy and tactica l decisio n s . Counsel shall discuss any plea neg otiations and plea offe rs. To obtain the response , the trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hearing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by couns el , th e t ri al court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent Applica

nt at the hea

ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law reg arding the claims raised in the habea s application. The trial court may also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law it deems rele vant and appropriate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claims for habea s corpus relief
. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order
. A supplem en t al transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order
. Any extensions of time shall be obtained fr om this C ourt. Filed: Mar ch 28, 2018 Do not publish
FSIS 1520-2 (10/16/2023)a Page 1 of 1

 

During the performance under this agreement, the Cooperator and/or State Agency agrees to: 

 

Comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-112), Age 

Discrimination Act of 1975 (P.L. 94-135), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. Section 1681), and all 

requirements imposed by the regulations of the Department of Agriculture (7 CFR Part 15), Department of Justice (28 CFR Parts 42 

and 50) and FSIS directives or regulations issued pursuant to that Act, as amended, and the regulations, to the effect that, no person 

in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, be excluded from participation in, be 

denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the State agency received 

Federal assistance from the Department; and hereby gives assurance that it will immediately take any measures necessary to 

effectuate this agreement. 

 

This agreement permits authorized USDA personnel to review such records, books, and accounts as needed during normal working 

hours to ascertain compliance. 

 

This assurance is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all allotments of Federal funds or other assistance 

extended after the date hereof to the recipient by the United States Department of Agriculture for the meat and poultry inspection 

program. This assurance is binding on the Cooperator and/or State Agency, its successors, transferees, and assignees. It is intended 

that the United States Department of Agriculture may rely on this assurance in providing such assistance, and that the United States 

shall have the right to seek its judicial enforcement. 

Organization Name: PR/Award Number or Project Name:

Name(s) and Title(s) of Authorized Representative(s):

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS 

CIVIL RIGHTS ASSURANCES STATEMENT 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE

First Authorized Signature: Second Authorized Signature: Date: (mm/dd/yyyy)
[No. 34999-0-II.

Division Two.

August 7, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Carl Joseph Antunez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 05-1-01229-3, Robert L. Harris, J., entered May 25, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Van Deren, A.C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and Penoyar, JJ.
| 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Hollywood Media Corp.; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | [Intentionally omitted]; |
|----|--------------------------|

| 4. | [Intentionally omitted]; and |
|----|------------------------------|

| 5. | [Intentionally omitted]. |
|----|--------------------------|

| Date:  April 29, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Scott Gomez                                                                    |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | Scott Gomez, Chief Accounting Officer (Principal financial and accounting officer) |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4554]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Monday, February 26, 2001.

Place: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 
800, Board Room, Washington, DC 20005.

Status: Open.

Contact Person for More Information: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General 
Counsel/Secretary, 202-220-2372 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e747c6c676d71705e706930716c79"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c3cbdbd0dac6c7e9c7de87c6dbce">[email protected]</span></a>.

Agenda:   
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes: November 20, 20, 2000, Regular Meeting
III. Audit Committee Report: January 9, 2001, Meeting
IV. Budget Committee Report: January 25, 2001, Meeting
V. Resolutions of Appreciation
VI. Treasurer's Report
VII. Executive Director's Management Report
VIII. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4554 Filed 2-20-01; 3:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2090

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude tips from gross

income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1993

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

tips from gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF TIPS FROM GROSS INCOME.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap5 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

6 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended

7 by redesignating section 137 as section 138 and by insert8 ing after section 136 the following new section:
2

•HR 2090 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 137. TIPS.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall not include

3 tips.

4 ‘‘(b) REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE SEC5 RETARY.—The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations

6 as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this sec7 tion.’’

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

9 The Secretary of the Treasury shall, within 90 days after

10 the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the Com11 mittee on Ways and Means recommendations for technical

12 and conforming amendments to the Internal Revenue

13 Code of 1986 which the Secretary of the Treasury consid14 ers appropriate as a result of the amendments made by

15 subsection (a).

16 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections

17 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

18 is amended by striking out the item relating to section

19 137 and by inserting in lieu thereof the following:

‘‘Sec. 137. Tips.

‘‘Sec. 138. Cross references to other Acts.’’

20 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

21 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to

22 tips received after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### In re Randall Lee CONRAD, Petitioner.

No. 14-1084.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 8, 2014.

Decided: April 11, 2014.

Randall Lee Conrad, Petitioner Pro Se.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randall Lee Conrad petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(3) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [OR-130-1020-PH; GP01-0104]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District.

# ACTION:

Notice of the meeting of the Eastern Washington Advisory Council; March 22, 2001, in Spokane, Washington. 

# SUMMARY:

A meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council will be held on March 22, 2001. The meeting will convene at 9 a.m., at the Spokane District Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1103 North Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington 99212-1275. The meeting will adjourn upon conclusion of business, but no later than 4 p.m. Public comments will be heard from 10 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. If necessary, to accommodate all wishing to make public comments, a time limit may be placed upon each speaker. At an appropriate time, the meeting will adjourn for approximately one hour for lunch. Topics to be discussed include Election of Chair, Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project Status Report, BLM Work Plan for FY 2001, BLM/Forest Service Fire Program, Charter Renewal and Next Meeting Scheduling. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District Office, 1103 N. Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington 99212; or call 509-536-1200. 

Dated: February 14, 2001. 

Joseph K. Buesing,

District Manager.

[FR Doc. 01-4466 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
* P ursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-10391

____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ELI TREVINO MUNGIA; ROY RAY MARTIN,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas

(5;95-CR-17-C)

April 7, 1997

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendants Eli Mungia and Roy Martin appeal their convictions

under the federal hate crimes statute, 18 U. S.C. § 245(b)(2)(B),

for shooting three African-American men. Finding no error, we

affirm.

Mungia asserts that his victims were not involved in a

federally protected activity at the time they were shot, and that

the district court accordingly did not have federal jurisdiction to

hear his case. Mungia was prosecuted under a federal statute thatdoes not require any showing of a “federally protected activity.”

The district court had jurisdiction to try the defendants under the

federal criminal statute under 18 U.S.C. § 3231.

Each defendant raises a separate sufficiency of the evidence

challenge. After reviewing the evidence, we conclude that a

reasonable trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt

that the defendants’ crimes were motivated by race and that the

streets and sidewalks on which the victims were shot qualify as a

“facility

. . . provided or administered by any State or

subdivision thereof.” 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2)(B); S ee also Kinney v.

Yerusalim

, 9 F.3d 1067, 1073 (3d Cir. 1993) (street is a “facility”

under section 245(b)), cert. denied

, 511 U.S. 1033, 114 S. Ct.

1545, 128 L. Ed. 2d 196 (1994); United States v. Three Juveniles

,

886 F. Supp. 934, 944 (D. Mass. 1995) (streets and sidewalks are

“facilities” under the statute).

Martin challenges the district court’s jury instruction

regarding whether the streets and sidewalks of Lubbock qualify as

facilities administered by the city. He asserts that, under U nited

States v. Gaudin

,

___ U.S.

___, 115 S. Ct. 2310, 132 L. Ed. 2d 444

( 1995), the court must leave this mixed question of law and fact

for the jury to determine. The court allowed the jury to find the

r elevant facts, and there is no evidence that the c ourt’s

instruc tion removed any element of the crime from the jury’s

consideration. We hold that the district court’s instruction in

this case was consistent with Gaudin and the Sixth Amendment of theU.S. Constitution.

AFFIRMED

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40446

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADOLFO NAVA-CORONA, also known as Juan 

Peredes-Gonzalez, also known as Juan Paredes-Gonzalez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-789-1

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adolfo Nava-Corona (“Nava”) appeals the 37-month sentence

imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found

in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. He contends that the aggravated-felony conviction that

resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)

was an element of the offense that should have been charged in

the indictment.
No. 02-40446

-2-

Nava acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the

Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for

Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Nava's

argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of INCOME GROWTH PARTNERS, LTD. X (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
C. Maurer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Timothy C. Maurer

Timothy C. Maurer
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gary L. Pittman, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the“registrant”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005   /s/ Gary L. Pittman   Gary L. Pittman  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2608 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2608
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                                 An Act

  
 
  To provide for the reauthorization of the collection and publication 
of quarterly financial statistics by the Secretary of Commerce through 
fiscal year 1998, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF COLLECTION AND PUBLICATION OF QUARTERLY 
FINANCIAL STATISTICS BY THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE.
    (a) In General.--Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ``An Act to amend 
title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for the 
quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade Commission to the 
Secretary of Commerce, and for other purposes'', approved January 12, 
1983 (Public Law 97-454; 96 Stat. 2494; 13 U.S.C. 91 note) is amended by 
striking out ``September 30, 1993'' and inserting in lieu 
thereof``September 30, 1998''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made under subsection (a) shall 
take effect on September 30, 1993.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`