alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                  FROM  THE   CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE  SHEETS  AND   CONSOLIDATED
                  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  FOUND  ON  PAGES 1, 2 AND 3 OF THE
                  COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN
                  ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                               US

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                    1
<CASH>                                                       323,269
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              2,614,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                                (120,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                3,686,078
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           6,604,536
<PP&E>                                                     4,889,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (2,856,869)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             8,743,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      2,829,143
<BONDS>                                                    3,116,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      55,406
<OTHER-SE>                                                 2,742,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               8,743,632
<SALES>                                                    4,985,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           4,985,387
<CGS>                                                      4,014,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              4,014,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             733,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           (73,409)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              183,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          183,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 183,076
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    .03


</TABLE>
#### VISTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPROQIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2007-1160.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2007.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      553
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                         57
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,846
<PP&E>                                           1,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                     927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,214
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         38
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,682
<SALES>                                          1,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,139
<CGS>                                              162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,033)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2554 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2554

  To amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Amendments of 1986 to 
 prevent the repeal of the exemption for certain bona fide hiring and 
  retirement plans applicable to State and local firefighters and law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1993

  Mr. Murphy (for himself, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Sarpalius, Mr. Lewis of 
 Florida, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Livingston, Mr. 
  Bryant, Ms. Danner, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Payne of Virginia, Mr. Neal of 
  North Carolina, Mr. Goss, Mr. Towns, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. 
  Fawell, Mr. Filner, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Neal of 
   Massachusetts, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Kreidler, Mr. 
 Emerson, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Sanders, Mr. de la Garza, 
 Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Blackwell, Mrs. Clayton, 
 Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Hoagland, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Poshard, Mrs. 
Meek, Mr. Gallo, Mr. Machtley, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Coppersmith, Mr. 
McNulty, Mr. Porter, Mr. Roth, Mr. Pastor, Mrs. Unsoeld, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
  Boucher, Mr. Mazzoli, Mr. Hughes, Mr. Weldon, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. 
   Stump, Mr. Cunningham, Ms. Shepherd, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Kildee, Mr. 
Zimmer, Ms. English of Arizona, Mr. Andrews of New Jersey, Mr. Meehan, 
   Mr. Reed, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Crane, Mr. Everett, Mr. Gene Green of 
Texas, Ms. Brown of Florida, Ms. McKinney, Ms. Margolies-Mezvinsky, Mr. 
   Tucker, Mr. Pickett, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Kopetski, Mr. Serrano, Mr. 
  LaFalce, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Mr. 
   Hansen) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Amendments of 1986 to 
 prevent the repeal of the exemption for certain bona fide hiring and 
  retirement plans applicable to State and local firefighters and law 
                         enforcement officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firefighters and Police Retirement 
Security Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. REPEALER.

    Section 3(b) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Amendments of 
1986 (29 U.S.C. 623 note) is repealed.

                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jason Dean Cravey, Appellant

No. 06-21-00050-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 47888-

B). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the bill of costs and judgment by reducing 

the sheriff fees from $225.00 to $75.00 and by deleting the imposition of a time payment fee. As 

modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

We note that the appellant, Jason Dean Cravey, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 12, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Rooney, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Daniel RooneyDaniel RooneyChairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer ofSCI Engineered Materials, Inc.(Principal Executive Officer)May 5, 2011





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald S. BlaskieVice President and Chief Financial Officer ofSCI Engineered Materials, Inc.(Principal FinancialOfficer and Principal Accounting Officer)May 5, 2011
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determi ned that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE U NI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10312 C onfer enc e Cal endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. C O R E YH O L M E S , al so kn ow n as B l u e, D e fe nda nt

- Appe l l ant

A pp eal f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 06- C R

- 89- 2

B ef ore G A R Z A , D E N N IS, an d E L R O D , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i c D ef enderappointe d t o r epr es ent C or ey H ol m es has
m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lifor n ia , 3 8 6 U. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. Ho l m e s h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e . Our i nde pe nde nt r e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo r a p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo r le a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D

. S ee 5 T H C IR
. R. 42. 2. United States Court of A pp eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 12, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-10312 Document: 00511027319 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00478- CR

In re W. P aul Par ash Ex parte Theodoro Quin ones

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 22ND J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. CR-12 -01 01- HC, H ONO RAB LE WI LLIAM H ENRY, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E
P ER CURIAM

This is a contempt proce eding ancillar y to Theodoro Quinones’s appea l. The subject of this proce eding is W . Paul Parash, appe llant’s reta ined attorne y .

Appellant filed a noti ce of appea l stating he wished to appe al from the t rial court’s interlocutory order s rela ted to his Motion to Reduce Bond. The cler k’s rec ord was filed on J uly 12, 2012, and the repor

ter’s rec ord was filed on October 8, 2012. I n November 2012, Mr. Parash made
sever al attempts to file a brief elec tronically , but the briefs wer e reje cted beca use they wer e untimely , lacke d a cor

rec t motion for ext ension of time, and ha d various er rors of f orm. On December 4, two wee ks afte r Mr. Parash’ s las t u n s u cce ssful attempt to file t he brief and a motion for extension of time, w e sent him notice that the brief was overdue , reque sting
a response by Dec ember 4. On April 23, 2013, afte r Mr. Parash failed to respond or file a corr ecte dbrief, we issued an order direc ting him to file the brief and motion for extension of time by May 3.

To date, Mr . Parash still has not responded to our communications or filed a brief. We here by order Mr. Parash to appea r in person on J une 5, 2013, at 1:30 p.m., in the courtroom of this Court, located in the Price Daniel, Sr. Building , 209 West 14th St., City of Austin, Travis County , Texas, to show why he should not be held in contempt and sanctions imposed for his failure to obey

the April 23 orde r of this Court. I t is ordere d May

17, 2013.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Do Not Publish

2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7327** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHONDU MAURICE DAWSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 5:04

- cr - 00305

- F

- 2 ; 5:12

- cv - 00292

- F )

Submitted : February 27, 2014 Decided: March 4 , 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender , Devon L. Donahue , OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Kimberly Ann Moore , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North C arolina, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shondu Maurice Dawson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unles s a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). W hen the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion st ates a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dawson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[No. 58137-6-I.

Division One.

August 27, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Allen Leon Stickel, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-1-01567-1, James D. Cayce, J., entered April 24, 2006. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SHAWN BURKE,

Respondent

v.

KRISTI TRUESDELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 105 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,438,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,530,300
<PP&E>                                      12,265,225
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,622,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,343,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          417,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,926,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,343,955
<SALES>                                      1,510,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,609,476
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,412,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                196,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            196,760
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   196,760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.75
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.15.5





Quaker City
Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Hank H. Kadowaki dated July 1, 2002.





QUAKER CITY BANK


CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


RENEWAL AND
EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT





Name of Participant:    Hank H. Kadowaki





The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly scheduled meeting on June 25, 2002, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank acted to renew and extend the Quaker City
Bank Change in Control Agreement with the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30, 2004.





Dated this
            1st             day of
            July            , A.D.,
            2002            .





QUAKER CITY BANK/s/    HANK H. KADOWAKI



By:

/s/    FREDERIC R.
MCGILLParticipant





President
Table of Contents

  **SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION****Washington, D.C. 20549** **FORM 20-F**   o **REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934****OR**   þ **ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934****For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007****OR**   o **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934****OR**   o **SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 23 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934****Date of event requiring this shell company report****For the transition period from                      to**                    **Commission file number:****001-12440****ENERSIS S.A.**(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)   **ENERSIS S.A.** **CHILE**   (Translation of Registrant’s name into English) (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)**Avenida Santa Rosa 76, Santiago**