alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2440

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science,

and Transportation

MAY 12 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Committee discharged

AN ACT

To amend the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to

authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1994, 1995, and

1996, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Independent Safety

5 Board Act Amendments of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2440 CDS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 Section 309(a) of the Independent Safety Board Act

3 of 1974 (49 U.S.C. App. 1907(a)) is amended by adding

4 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘There are author5 ized to be appropriated for the purposes of this Act not

6 to exceed $37,580,000 for the fiscal year ending Septem7 ber 30, 1994, $44,000,000 for the fiscal year ending Sep8 tember 30, 1995, and $45,100,000 for the fiscal year end9 ing September 30, 1996; such sums to remain available

10 until expended.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Private Calendar No. 

3

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2625

[Report No. 103–192]

A BILL

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

JULY 27, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
VII

Private Calendar No. 3

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2625

[Report No. 103–192]

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 13, 1993

Mr. ANDREWS of Maine introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 27, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRANT OF NATURALIZATION TO OLGA D.

4 ZHONDETSKAYA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the inability of

6 Olga D. Zhondetskaya to meet the requirements of section

7 316 of the Immigration and Nationality Act that relate

8 to residence and physical presence in the United States,
2

•HR 2625 RH

1 she shall be naturalized as a citizen of the United States

2 upon the filing of the appropriate application and upon

3 being administered the oath of renunciation and allegiance

4 pursuant to section 337 of the Immigration and National5 ity Act.

6 (b) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

7 FEES.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if the application

8 for naturalization is filed with appropriate fees within 1

9 year of the date of the enactment of this Act.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7451
SCOTT WEDINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA03-2431-8-DKC) Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wedington v. U.S. District Court , No. CA-03-2431-8-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 136123 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, J r. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, J ustices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136123 COA: 279645 Wayne CC: 98-006159 COREY COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 27, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

d0924 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 1, 2008

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Hart, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: August 7, 2009





/s/ John R. Hart


John R. Hart


President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) forthe period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the  “Report”),  I, Richard T. Schumacher, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) that:

 

(1)           The  Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005 | */s/ Richard T. Schumacher*           |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                     | Richard T. Schumacher                 |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Pressure BioSciences, Inc.  and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences,Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1514

FENYANG STEWART,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., Hon., in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department 

of Commerce; ANDREI IANCU, in his official capacity as Director, United States 

Patent & Trademark Office,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01369-LMB-TCB; 1:16-cv00213-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: January 4, 2021 Decided: January 21, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fenyang Ajamu Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine M. Yang, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fenyang Stewart appeals the district court’s order (a) dismissing in part, pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the amended consolidated complaint in Stewart’s consolidated 

employment actions, which related to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office terminating 

Stewart’s employment in 2016; and (b) granting Defendants partial summary judgment on 

one of the claims asserted in the amended consolidated complaint. Upon review of the 

parties’ arguments in conjunction with the record on appeal and the relevant authorities, 

we discern no reversible error in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned analysis. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Ross, 

Nos. 1:18-cv-01369-LMB-TCB; 1:16-cv-00213-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2020). We 

deny Stewart’s motion for leave to supplement his informal brief and for the appointment 

of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) National 
Advisory Council in January 2001.
    The agenda will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual grant applications and detailed discussion of information 
about the Center's procurement plans. Therefore a portion of the 
meeting will be closed to the public as determined by the 
Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 
5 U.S.C. app. 2, section 10(d).
    The agenda of the open portion will include CSAP's Director's 
Report, an update of CSAP's budget, SAMHSA's Administrator's Report, 
Council's recommendations on programs, and discussions and updates on 
CSAP programs, administrative matters and announcements.
    If anyone needs special accommodations for persons with 
disabilities, please notify the contact listed below.
    A summary of this meeting and roster of committee members may be 
obtained from Yuth Nimit, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Rockwall II 
Building, Suite 910, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, 
Telephone: (301) 443-8455.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the contact 
listed below.
    Committee Name: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention National 
Advisory Council.
    Meeting Dates: January 8, 2001.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015, (202) 362-9300.
    Closed: January 8, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.
    Open: January 8, 2001, 10:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Contact: Yuth Nimit, Ph.D., 5515 Security Lane, Rockwall II 
Building, Suite 910, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone: (301) 443-
8455.

    Dated: January 2, 2001.
Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-472 Filed 1-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             SOLA INTERNATIONAL INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      YEAR ENDED
                                                                       ---------------------------------------
                                                                         2001           2002           2003
<S>                                                                    <C>            <C>            <C>
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense ..............................................     $  24,589      $  28,332      $  30,454
   Interest capitalized during period ............................           185            150            318
   Amortization of financing costs ...............................           986          2,543          3,086
   Interest portion of rental expense ............................         2,586          2,280          2,896
                                                                       ---------      ---------      ---------
        Total fixed charges ......................................     $  28,346      $  33,305      $  36,754
                                                                       =========      =========      =========

Earnings:
   Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes ..     $(100,492)     $  25,035      $   3,095
   Fixed charges per above .......................................        28,346         33,305         36,754
   Less interest capitalized during the period ...................          (185)          (150)          (318)
   Current period amortization of interest capitalized in prior
      periods ....................................................            36             62             92
                                                                       ---------      ---------      ---------
        Earnings/deficiency in earnings, as adjusted .............     $ (72,295)     $  58,252      $  39,622
                                                                       =========      =========      =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...............................            --           1.75           1.08
Ratio of deficiency in earnings to fixed charges .................         (2.55)            --             --
</TABLE>

For purposes of this calculation, earnings/deficiency in earnings are defined as
income/(loss) before provision for income taxes, minority interest and
discontinued operations plus fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest
expense on all indebtedness (including amortization of deferred financing costs)
and the portion of operating lease rental expense which management believes is
representative of the interest factor of rent expense (approximately one-third
of rent expense).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Scott D. Kaplan, Chief Executive Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby
certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life Insurance
Company of New Jersey) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.

Date: August 13, 2010



/s/ Scott D. KaplanScott D. KaplanChief Executive OfficerPruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of American Retirement Villas Properties II, a California Limited Partnership (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 16, 2004



By:

/s/ JOHN A. MOOREJohn A. MooreChief Executive Officer ofARV Assisted Living, Inc.,Managing General Partner
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2186 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2186

    To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on dimethyl succinyl 
                               succinate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

 Mr. Ravenel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend until January 1, 1996, the duty on dimethyl succinyl 
                               succinate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMETHYL SUCCINYL SUCCINATE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
      

       ``  9902.32.12  Dimethyl succinyl succinate (provided for in subheading                     No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        2917.19.40).............................................  Free                                                31/95             
                                                                                                                                                      ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7752.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 24, 2014.

Decided: April 28, 2014.

Brian Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Shailika K. Shah, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brian Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. *262§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certifícate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
I N THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL O F THE S TATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EX PIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JE RMAINE JEROD DANZY , App ellant ,
v. Case No

. 5D 23

- 248 LT Cas e No. 16 -2 021- CF -0 01495
STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed May 16, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val C ounty , London M. Kite, Judge. J essica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross S

. Haine, II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

JAY, SOUD and BOATWRIGHT , JJ. , conc ur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3546

_____________________________

KEANDRE LANELL WESLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

March 5, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Dixon, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

Order Denying Motion for En Banc Reconsideration and M o tion for O r al Argument

Appellate case name: Charlie Thomas Chevrolet, Ltd d/b/a Champion Chevrolet Gulf

Freeway v. Genaro Martinez

Appe llate case number: 01

- 17

- 00830

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 27666

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

T h e En Banc C ourt unanimously voted to deny Appe llee Genaro Martinez ’ s mo tion for

e n b anc r econsideration and his motion for oral argument. There fo re, t he motion for en banc

reconsideration and motion for oral argument are both denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightow er

Acting for En Banc Court

En Banc Court consis ts of Chief Justice Radack and J ustices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelley, Goodman,

Landau, Hightower, and Countiss

Date: January 7, 2020