alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CALICO BRAND, INC. and Honson Marketing Group, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERITEK IMPORTS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant, and ACME International Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Nos. 2008-1324, 2008-1325, 2008-1341.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Calico Brand, Inc. and Honson Marketing Group, Inc. (Calico) move to lift the stay of proceedings and set a briefing schedule with respect to its claims against Acme International Enterprises, Inc. Acme responds and “takes no position” on the motion.

These appeals were stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 upon the filing of Ameritek Imports, Inc.’s bankruptcy petition. Calico asserts that the appeals with respect to Acme should proceed. The court notes that it has not received a recent status report from Ameritek regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings following the status report received on September 28, 2010. A status report was due in December of 2010. It appears from a review of the bankruptcy court docket that proceedings before that court may be completed.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Ameritek is directed to file a status report in 2008-1324, -1325 within 14 days concerning the status of the bankruptcy proceeding. If this court does not receive a status report, Ameritek’s cross-appeal, 2008-1325, will be dismissed, the stay of the briefing schedule will be lifted, Calico’s opening brief will be due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order, and 2008-1324, -1341 will proceed.

(2) The motion is denied without prejudice to renewal.
Form 8966

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

FATCA Report

▶ Information about Form 8966 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8966.

OMB No. 1545-2246

2016

Check if report is being corrected, amended, voided, or there are no accounts to report

Corrected report Amended report Voided report Check if no accounts to report (see instructions)

Part I Identification of Filer

1a Name of filer 1b Enter the filer category (see instructions) ▶

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State, province, or region 3c Country, including postal code 

4 Global intermediary identification number (GIIN)

. . .

5 TIN

6 Name of sponsored entity or intermediary, if applicable

7 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

8a City or town 8b State, province, or region 8c Country, including postal code 

9 GIIN

. . .

10 TIN

Part II Account Holder or Payee Information

1a Name of account holder or payee 1b Indicate whether account holder or payee is an individual or entity

Individual Entity

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State, province, or region 3c Country, including postal code 

4 TIN

5 If account holder or payee is an entity, check applicable box to specify the entity type:

Owner-Documented FFI with specified U.S. owner(s) Passive NFFE with substantial U.S. owner(s)

Non-Participating FFI Specified U.S. Person

Part III Owner Information (File a separate report for each U.S. Owner that is a specified U.S. Person)

1 Name of owner

2 Number, street, and room or suite no. (if P.O. box, see instructions)

3a City or town 3b State, province, or region 3c Country, including postal code 

4 TIN of owner

Part IV Financial Information

1 Account number 2 Currency code (see instructions)

3a Account balance

3b Check if account closed during the year (see instructions)

4a Interest

4b Dividends

4c Gross proceeds/Redemptions

4d Other

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 55748F Form 8966 (2016) 
Form 8966 (2016) Page 2 

Part V Pooled Reporting Type

1 Check applicable pooled reporting type (check only one):

Recalcitrant account holders with U.S. Indicia

Dormant accounts

Recalcitrant account holders that are U.S. persons

Recalcitrant account holders without U.S. Indicia

Non-participating FFI

Recalcitrant account holders that are passive NFFEs

2 Number of accounts 3 Aggregate payment amount

4 Aggregate account balance 5 Currency code

Form 8966 (2016)
Exhibit 21.1
**United States Subsidiaries:**
 •  Lexxus International, Inc. (Delaware) •  Lexxus Interanational, Inc. (Florida) •  Lighthouse Marketing Corp. (Delaware) •  I Luv My Pet, Inc. (Delware) •  eKaire.com, Inc. (Delaware) •  MarketVision Communications Corp. (Delaware) •  Lexxus Korea, Inc. (Delaware)
**Non-United States Subsidiaries:**
 •  Lexxus International (SW Pacific) Pty. Ltd. (Australia) •  Kaire Nutraceuticals Australia Pty. Ltd. (Australia) •  Lexxus Interanational (NZ) Ltd. (New Zealand) •  Kaire Nutraceuticals New Zealand Ltd. (New Zealand) •  Lexxus International Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) •  KGC Networks Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) •  Lexxus International Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong) •  Lexxus Marketing, Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) •  Lexxus International Network Marketing, Inc. (Philippines) •  LXK Ltd. (South Korea) •  Lexxus International (China) Co., Ltd. (R.O.C.) •  Natural Health Trends Japan Corp. (Japan) •  MyLexxus Personal Care International (India) Pvt. Ltd. •  MyLexxus Europe AG (Switzerland) •  NHTC Holding Company (Cayman Islands) •  NHTC Trading Company (Cayman Islands) •  Lexxus International (Canada) Company •  LXXS Marketing Company SDN.BHD (Malaysia) •  Distribuidora NHTC de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico) •  Servicios NHTC de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico) •  Importadora NHTC de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of RBC Life Sciences, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Clinton H. Howard
Clinton H. Howard
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer November 12, 2007  28
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION



Exhibit 99.1



Written Statement of
Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of BSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    HOWARD W.
SHARPHoward W. Sharp Chief Executive Officer May 15,
2003




A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BSB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained BSB Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Baba KABA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-70605.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 19, 2011.

Bakary Fansu Conteh, Esquire, Law Office of Bakary Fansu Conteh, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

*999Dana Michelle Camilleri, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Baba Kaba, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. “This court reviews factual determinations, including credibility determinations, for substantial evidence.” *Morgan v. Mukasey,*529 F.3d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that circumstances in Sierra Leone have fundamentally changed such that Kaba does not have a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1); *Sowe v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 1281, 1285-87 (9th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to Kaba’s asylum claim.

Because Kaba failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily cannot demonstrate eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s determination that Kaba failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured by or with the acquiescence of government officials if returned to Sierra Leone. *See Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1068 (9th Cir.2009). We therefore deny the petition as to his CAT claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          118588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   732897
<ALLOWANCES>                                     43095
<INVENTORY>                                     691951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1675369
<PP&E>                                         1731429
<DEPRECIATION>                                  447303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3969278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1297593
<BONDS>                                         614543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1059
<OTHER-SE>                                     2059824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3969278
<SALES>                                        3595241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3674243
<CGS>                                          1120884
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1229452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3177988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               55884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (664966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (664966)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (664966)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)
        

</TABLE>
With No With No 

Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding 

Direct Loans Direct Loans Direct Loans Direct Loans 

(2016) I (2016) (2015) 2 (2015) 2 

--- Number of Borrowers ---

ts 3,884j 

e 3,8051 

m Limit Reached: 3 

) 369( 

139( 

554j 

ng After Term Limit 7461 

mit Reached 

25j 

2,255/ 

1,810/ 

400/ 

245l 

ucer (SDA) 458! 

147/ 

231 

3,227/ 

oans (FO, OL, and EM). 

ports. Revisions occur in subsequent tables as well. 

mptions for beginning farmers. 

ve. A beginning fanner may also be a racial-:ethnic minority, woman, or veteran. 

ned as IO or less years of fanning experience) at time of last direct OL obligation. 

3,184J 

3,166! 

! 

283! 88 

153! 113 

446! 795 

675! 

I 

452 

I 

I 

21i 

1,686! 1,360! 

318! 

194! 

458! 

151! 

32! 

2,854] 

With No 

Outstanding Outstanding 

Direct Loans Direct Loans 

(2014) 2 (2014) 2 

2,931 / 2,708 2,5291 

276/ 68 

173! 91 

417j 777 

"'I 449 455 

28! 43 

1,570/ 1,146 

l,232j 893 

2931 162 

I5Il 112 

4241 250 

15( 216 

47! 301 

2_,609! 2,012 

eligible voters resulting in the number of eligible voters being less than the number of borrowers. A legal entity may be a borrower, but only the individual members would 

ttee (COC) voters. "8CIMS" is the Service Center Information Management System database that contains information on producers.
Exhibit 8.1  List of Main Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries
     
     Jurisdiction
     
     Usual NameAmpla Energia e Serviços S.A.
     
     Brazil
     
     AmplaCentrais Elétricas Cachoeira Dourada S.A.
     
     Brazil
     
     Cachoeira DouradaCGTF - Central Geradora Termelétrica Fortaleza S.A.
     
     Brazil
     
     Endesa FortalezaChilectra S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     ChilectraCodensa S.A. E.S.P.
     
     Colombia
     
     CodensaCompañía Americana de Multiservicios Ltda.
     
     Chile
     
     CAMCompañía de Inteconexión Energética S.A.
     
     Brazil
     
     CIENCompañía Eléctrica San Isidro S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     San IsidroCompañía Eléctrica Tarapacá S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     CeltaCompanhía Energética de Ceará S.A.
     
     Brazil
     
     CoelceEdegel S.A.A.
     
     Peru
     
     EdegelEmgesa S.A. E.S.P.
     
     Colombia
     
     EmgesaEmpresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.
     
     Argentina
     
     EdesurEmpresa Eléctrica Pangue S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     PangueEmpresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     PehuencheEmpresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     Endesa ChileEndesa Brasil S.A.
     
     Brazil
     
     Endesa BrasilEndesa Costanera S.A.
     
     Argentina
     
     Endesa CostaneraEndesa Eco S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     Endesa EcoHidroeléctrica El Chocón S.A.
     
     Argentina
     
     El ChocónInmobiliaria Manso de Velasco S.A.
     
     Chile
     
     IMVEmpresa de Distribución Eléctrica de Lima Norte S.A.A.
     
     Peru
     
     EdelnorSynapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT Ltda.
     
     Chile
     
     Synapsis


---
#### INDIANA STATE POLICE PENSION TRUST, et al., Applicants, v. CHRYSLER LLC, et al.

No. 08A1096.

June 8, 2009.

ORDER

GINSBURG, Justice.

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants, and the responses filed thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that the orders of this Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, case No. 09-50002, dated May 31 and June 1, 2009, are stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2342 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2342

 To reinstate the eligibility of certain nonaccredited institutions of 
 higher education for financial assistance under the Higher Education 
                              Act of 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1993

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate the eligibility of certain nonaccredited institutions of 
 higher education for financial assistance under the Higher Education 
                              Act of 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION OF INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

    Section 1201(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end of the first sentence the 
following: ``, or if not so accredited, (A) is an institution with 
respect to which the Secretary has determined that there is 
satisfactory assurance, considering the resources available to the 
institution, the period of time, if any, during which it has operated, 
the effort it is making to meet accreditation standards, and the 
purpose for which this determination is being made, that the 
institution will meet the accreditation standards of such an agency or 
association within a reasonable time, or (B) is an institution whose 
credits are accepted, on transfer, by not less than 3 institutions 
which are so accredited, for credit on the same basis as if transferred 
from an institution so accredited''.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Doug Lorenzen, Pamela Bishop, :

Phillip J. Stober, and Concerned :

Citizens of Lebanon County :

:

v. : No. 851 C.D. 2018

:

West Cornwall Township Zoning :

Hearing Board and Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. :

:

Appeal of: Doug Lorenzen, Pamela :

Bishop, Phillip J. Stober, and C oncerned :

Citizens of Lebanon County :

O R D E R

NOW, December 6, 2019

, having considered Appellee Sunoco Pipeline

L.P. ’s application for reargument

, and Appellants’ answer in response thereto , the

application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
**Exhibit 13.3**

 

**906 CERTIFICATION**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the amended annual report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Ignacio Antoñanzas A., the Chief Executive Officer and Eduardo Escaffi J., the Chief Financial Officer of ENERSIS S.A., each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.              the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.              the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Enersis.

 

Date: February 25, 2013.

 

 
|   | /s/   Ignacio Antoñanzas A. |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Name: Ignacio Antoñanzas A. |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer        |
|   |                             |
|   |                             |
|   | /s/   Eduardo Escaffi J.         |
|   | Name:   Eduardo Escaffi J.       |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer        |

 

----
**Exhibit 10.22.1**

 

**Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Teresa A. Thompson dated July 1, 2003.**

 

**QUAKER CITY BANK**

**CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT**

**RENEWAL AND EXTENSIONACKNOWLEDGMENT**

 

Name of Participant:    Teresa A. Thompson

 

The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly scheduledmeeting on June 19, 2003, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement with the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30, 2005. 

 

Datedthis            1st            dayof            July            ,A.D.,            2003            .
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                       fs topics                  
-                       Job Corps                  

**April 15, 2024**

********

**Women Spark Interest in Fire   **

**March 22, 2024**

********

**Second chances and clean water**

**November 24, 2023**

********

**Indian Youth Service Corps making a difference**

**October 27, 2023**

********

**Transforming lives in Bangladesh**

**October 4, 2023**

********

**Students of fire**

**September 6, 2023**

********

**Strengthening youth, transforming lives**

-  1 
-  2 
-   Next  
-   Last  

## Pages

Conference on Asian Pacific American Leadership Public Service Internship Program 

USDA Wallace-Carver Fellowship 

USDA 1994 Tribal Scholars Program

-  1 
-  2 
-   Next  
-   Last  

## Updates

-  1 
-  2 
-   Next  
-   Last
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2530

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to authorize

appropriations for programs, functions, and activities of the Bureau

of Land Management, Department of the Interior, for fiscal year 1994,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 24, 1993

Mr. VENTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act

of 1976 to authorize appropriations for programs, functions, and activities of the Bureau of Land Management,

Department of the Interior, for fiscal year 1994, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND STATUTORY REFERENCE.

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

5 ‘‘Fiscal Year 1994 BLM Authorization Act’’.
2

HR 2530 IH

1 (b) STATUTORY REFERENCE.—As used in this Act,

2 the term ‘‘the Act’’ means the Federal Land Policy and

3 Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.).

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION AND FUTURE REAUTHORIZA5 TIONS.

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Section 318(a) of the Act (43

7 U.S.C. 1748(a)) is amended by striking out ‘‘October 1,

8 1978’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October 1, 1994’’.

9 (b) FUTURE REAUTHORIZATIONS.—Section 318(b)

10 of the Act is amended by striking ‘‘May 15, 1977, and

11 not later than May 15 of each second even numbered year

12 thereafter’’ and by inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘January 1,

13 1994, and January 1 of each second odd-numbered year

14 thereafter’’.

Æ
Exhibit 4.23


 


Summary Translation


 


Lease Agreement between Shenzhen Shilian
Junhui Real Estate Operation and Management Inc. and Shenzhen Yimao New Energy Sales Co., Ltd.


 


Party A: Shenzhen Shilian Junhui Real
Estate Operation and Management Inc.


Party B: Shenzhen Yimao New Energy Sales Co., Ltd.


 


The two parties signed a Lease Agreement. Party A rented the place to Party B.


The house is located in Suite 510, Floor
5, Tower B, Zhongshe Square, 1028 Buji Rd, Luohu District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China, with an area of 120 square
meters.


The place is used as office space for Party
B.


 


The rental period of the place is from
November 12, 2019 to November 11, 2020. The rent is paid every month. The total annual rent of the house is 7,800 yuan.


 


The Agreement is made in duplicate with
all parties herein holding one copies each with the same legal effect.


 


 


Shenzhen Shilian Junhui Real Estate
Operation and Management Inc.


(Corporate Chop)


 


By: /s/


 


Shenzhen Yimao New Energy Sales Co.,
Ltd.


(Corporate Chop)


 


By: /s/ Mingqin Dong