alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.1

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                         -------------------------------
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           --------------------------


I, Todd Bruce, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Crystallex
International Corporation (the "registrant"), certify that:

1. Based on myknowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2003 ("Form 20-F"), of the registrant fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information contained in Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Date: May 18, 2004

                                     /s/ Todd Bruce
                                     --------------
                                     Todd Bruce
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Crystallex International Corporation and will be retained by such
corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2508 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2508

             To suspend temporarily the duty on benzoxazol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1993

 Mr. Quillen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on benzoxazol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.32.33   Benzoxazol (provided for in subheading 3204,20.50)......  Free             No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                                                                      31/94           ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse consumption, on or after the 15th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 Economic and Policy Analysis Reports
 Report Type ALLPeanut ReportsWool and Mohair ReportsUpland Cotton ReportsELS Cotton ReportsRice ReportsCommodity Loan Activity Reports
   Report Year ALL
   Sort By Date Posted(Newest -> Oldest)Date Posted(Oldest -> Newest)
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
2009-1633.

#### In re Kafantaris.

Columbiana App. No. 07-CO-28, 2009-Ohio-4814. On motion for stay of execution pending appeal. Motion denied.

Cupp, J., dissents.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Earth Sciences Proposal Review Panel (1569).                    

*Date/Time:*                         March 21-23, 2001, 8 a.m.-6 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA Rm. 110.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Herman B. Zimmerman, Division Director, Division of Earth Sciences, Room 785, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA (703) 292-8550.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate earth sciences proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 20, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-4561 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30098

Summary Calendar

DAVID JACOBSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

ANDCORRECTIONS;LOUISIANADEPARTMENT OFPUBLIC SAFETY AND

CORRECTIONS, Municipal Entity; HOWARD PRINCE; ROBERT

HENDERSON; LATERDA DRUMMON,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:10-CV-251

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Jacobson, Louisiana prisoner # 558909, moves this court to proceed

in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The district court denied his request to

proceed IFP on appeal certifying that the appeal was not taken in good faith. 

Jacobson’s IFP motion in this court is a challenge to the district court’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 11, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30098 Document: 00511569202 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2011
No. 11-30098

certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117

F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1992).

The dismissal of an IFP complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Geiger v. Jowers, 404

F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 2005). Because Jacobson has not shown that he will

present any nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is

denied and this appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202

n.24; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The district court’s dismissal of Jacobson’s § 1983 complaint for failure to

state a claim and our dismissal of this appeal as frivolous both count as strikes

for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383,

387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Jacobson is cautioned that if he accumulates three

strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or

appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.

2

Case: 11-30098 Document: 00511569202 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2011
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                                GC COMPANIES, INC.
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY





GENERAL CINEMA THEATRES, INC.

G.C. Theatre Corp. of California GC Grill Holdings, Inc.
Cinema Ventures, LLC (50%)
GC Security Corp.
GCT Louisiana Beverage Services, Inc.
GCT Management, Inc.
GCT Pacific Beverage Services, Inc.
General Cinema Corp. of Georgia
General Cinema Corp. of Indiana
General Cinema Corp. of Louisiana
General Cinema Corp. of Maryland, Inc.
General Cinema Corp. of Massachusetts
General Cinema Corp. of Michigan
General Cinema Corp. of Minnesota, Inc.
General Cinema Corp. of New York, Inc.
General Cinema Corp. of North Carolina
General Cinema Corp. of Oklahoma, Inc.
General Cinema Corp. of Owings Mills
General Cinema Corp. Parkway Pointe
General Cinema Corp. of Pennsylvania
General Cinema Corp. of Rhode Island
General Cinema Corp. of South Carolina
General Cinema Corp. of Tennessee
General Cinema Corp. of Texas
General Cinema Corp. of Virginia
General Cinema Corp. of Washington
General Cinema of Arizona, Inc.
General Cinema of Framingham, Inc.
General Cinema of New Mexico, Inc.
General Cinema Theatres of Columbia, Inc.
General Cinema Theatres of Delaware, Inc.
General Cinema Theatres of Florida, Inc.
General Cinema Theatres of Illinois, Inc.
General Cinema Theatres of New Jersey, Inc.
General Cinema Theatres of Ohio, Inc.
General Cinema Tickets, Inc.
General Cinema Specialty Film, Inc. Sundance Cinema Circuit, LLC (55%)
Cinema Ad-Ventures, Inc.
Global Cinema Network, Inc.
Joliet Cinema, Inc.
Knights Holding Corp.
Knights Realty Corp.
Knights Theatre Corp.
Louis Joliet Cinema, Inc.
Premium Cinema of Yorktown, Inc.

GENERAL CINEMA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Arrendadora Inmobiliaria Cinematografica S.A. de C.V. (50%)
Operadora de Cinemas, S.A. de C.V. (50%)
Servicios Especializados Cinematograficos, S.A. de C.V. (50%)


HOYTS GENERAL CINEMA SOUTH AMERICA, INC. (50%)

GCC/Hoyts Brazil, Inc.
   General Cinema do Brasil Empreendimentos, Ltda.
Boca Holdings, Inc.
   General Cinema de Argentina, S.A.
   Hoyts Cinema de Argentina, S.A.
GCC/Hoyts Chile, Inc.
   Hoyts Cinemas Chile S.A. (90%)
GCC Hoyts Uruguay, Inc.
   Telnir, S.A. (50%)


GCC INVESTMENTS, INC.

Chestnut Hill Clothes, Inc.
Chestnut Hill Foods, Inc.
Chestnut Hill Media, Inc.
Chestnut Hill Re, Inc.
Chestnut Hill Telecom, Inc.
Chestnut Hill (GTS Trust)
Chestnut Hill Vision, Inc.
Chestnut Hill Wireless, Inc.
GCC Radio, Inc.
# FY16Q1

# FY16Q2

# FY16Q3

# FY16Q4

# AMR - User Notes
#### SAPERE WEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC, Granite Asset Management, Sapere CTA Fund, L.P., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD., Plan Administrator, James W. Giddens, Trustee for the Sipa Liquidation of MF Global, Inc., MFG Assurance Company, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, Lead Plaintiffs, Hennigcarey Proprietary Trading, LLC, Charles Carey, Joseph Nicoforo, Robert Tierney, Brian Fisher, Shane McMahon, Michael Mette, Timothy Zaug, Representative Customer Group, Sangani Family LP, Appellees.

Nos. 12-4732-BK, 12-4797-BK, 12-4827-BK.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 19, 2014.

John J. Witmeyer III, Ford Marrin Es-posito Witmeyer & Gleser, LLP (John R. Grabowski, Ford Marrin Esposito Witmeyer & Gleser, LLP, Joseph H. Stallings, Howard, Stallings, From & Huston, P.A., on the brief), New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

P. Benjamin Duke, Covington & Burling LLP (Anthony J. Sun, Covington *&*Bur-ling LLP, Brett H. Miller, Morrison & Foerster LLP, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellee MF Global Holdings Ltd.

James B. Kobak, Jr. (Jeremy Turk, on the brief), Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York, NY, for Appellee James W. Giddens.

Stephen Doody (Joseph Badtke-Berkow, on the brief), Allen *&*Overy LLP, New York, NY, for Appellee MFG Assurance Company.

Leslie S. Ahari (Meredith E. Werner, on the brief), Troutman Sanders LLP, McLean, VA, for Appellee U.S. Specialty Insurance Company.

Present: ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, RALPH K. WINTER, GUIDO CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, *J.).*

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is hereby ORDERED that the appeals are DISMISSED as moot.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Sapere Wealth Management LLC, Granite Asset Manage*82ment, and Sapere CTA Fund, L.P. (collectively “Sapere”) appeal from a judgment entered on November 14, 2012 by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, /.), which affirmed an April 10, 2012 Memorandum Opinion of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Glenn, *J.).*Sapere argues on appeal that the bankruptcy court erred in allowing insurers of MF Global Holdings Ltd. to pay litigation expenses on behalf of former directors, officers, and employees of MF Global Inc. (“MF Global”). Sapere claims that it and other commodities customers had acquired “vested rights” in the insurance policy proceeds based on a shortfall of funds in their customer accounts at the time of MF Global’s bankruptcy.

In April 2014, the Trustee of the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78aaa *et seq.,*began paying commodities customers’ net equity claims in full, and Sapere has since received payments covering the entirety of the shortfall in its customer accounts. Accordingly, Sapere no longer has an interest in this litigation, and so the appeals are DISMISSED as moot. *See Associated Gen. Contractors of Conn., Inc. v. City of New Haven,*41 F.3d 62, 65 (2d Cir.1994).
FY 2020 Transportation Cost Rate Table

STATE Eligible Commodity 

and/or Input

Unit of Measure Fixed Rates Set Rates

ALASKA No fixed rates established ------- -------

23% (Urban)*

25% (Rural)**

29% (Off-Road)***

HAWAII & 

PACIFIC 

BASIN

Eligible Commodity 

and/or Input

Unit of Measure Fixed Rate Set Rates

Cattle (export) Head $200.00

Large items costing over 

$17,500 per unit such as

Cars trucks and tractors

Item $1,500.00

All imports/exports

w/o fixed rate

  ------- 22.5%

Commodity/input 

transported over 30 

miles on same Island

** ** ------- 5%

U.S. VIRGIN 

ISLANDS

Eligible Commodity 

and/or Input

Unit of Measure Fixed Rate Set Rates

Cattle Head $276.00

All inputs and exports 

costing over $7,500 

Unit $1,575.00

Fuel (all types) Gallon ------- 23%

All imports/exports 

w/o fixed rate

------- ------- 23%

PUERTO 

RICO

Eligible Commodity 

and/or Input

Unit of Measure Fixed Rate Set Rates

Crop, Livestock and/or 

Input

Mileage $0.60

Feed (all livestock) Hundredweight $0.80

Cattle (Import) Head $650.00

Coffee (Export) Hundredweight $60.00

Fertilizer Hundredweight $1.50

Chemical Gallon $2.50

Chemical Pound $0.10

All imports/exports 

w/o fixed rate

***** ***** 21%

*(Urban) The area within 50 road miles of Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Juneau

** (Rural) The area outside the urban areas but on the road system

*** (Off-Road) All other areas of Alaska that are not urban or rural.

**** Unit of measure will vary by item.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,022,444
<SECURITIES>                                   393,380
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,415,824
<PP&E>                                      16,833,223
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,939,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,249,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,676
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,158,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,249,047
<SALES>                                        926,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               983,415
<CGS>                                          119,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               368,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                495,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            495,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   495,214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    17.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    17.74
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7704** 

THEO LAY, JR. , P etitioner

- Appellant ,

v. GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellee s .

Appeal from th e United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8 :10

- cv - 0 1311

- AW )

Submitted : May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un pu blished per curiam opinion

.
Theo Lay, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Theo Lay, J r., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certific ate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reaso nable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief o n procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewe d the record and conclude that Lay has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED