alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2299 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2299

     To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on Pigment Blue 60.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1993

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on Pigment Blue 60.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT BLUE 60.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.32.05  Pigment Blue 60 (provided for in subheading 3204.17.50)..  Free             No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                                                                      31/94           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to articles 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
941 A.2d 1259

#### Kyle A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI-DALLAS RECORD OFFICE, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 7, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2008, upon application of Appellees, this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2223

To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in Dallas,

Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1993

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin

Street in Dallas, Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street

5 in Dallas, Texas, is designated as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith

6 Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

9 map, or other paper of the United States to the building
2

•HR 2223 IH

1 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

2 the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal Building’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                           2,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                       227
<INVENTORY>                                     44,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,177
<PP&E>                                          73,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,592
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,794
<SALES>                                         37,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,919
<CGS>                                           29,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,289)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,872)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,417)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,417)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.56)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Clinton H. HowardClinton H. HowardChairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 26

[TD 8912]
RIN 1545-AX08


Generation-Skipping Transfer Issues; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations that 
were published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, December 20, 2000 
(65 FR 79735) relating to the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax 
imposed under chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue Code.

DATES: This correction is effective December 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James F. Hogan (202) 622-3090 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this correction are 
under section 2601 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations contain an error that may prove 
to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 8912), 
that were the subject of FR Doc. 00-31757, is corrected as follows:


Sec. 26.2601-1  [Corrected]

    On page 79740, column 2, Sec. 26.2601-1, paragraph (b)(4)(i)(E), 
Example 9., line 6, the language ``is to pass to the A's issue, per 
stirpes. Under'' is corrected to read ``is to pass to A's issue, per 
stirpes. Under''.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special Counsel (Modernization and 
Strategic Planning).
[FR Doc. 01-4292 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
OMB No. 1545-1800 Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement Form 8886

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Number, street, and room or suite no.

a

b

c

1a Name of reportable transaction 1b Tax shelter registration number (11-digits) (if any)

2 Identify the type of reportable transaction. Check the box(es) that apply. (see instructions)

Form 8886 (3-2003)

 Attach to your tax return.

Cat. No. 34654G

Listed transaction

Confidential transaction

6

If the transaction is a “listed transaction” or substantially similar to a listed transaction, identify the listed

transaction (see instructions)  

3

 See separate instructions.

(March 2003)

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

City or town, state, and ZIP code

Transaction with contractual protection

d

e

f

Loss transaction

Transaction with significant book-tax difference

Transaction with brief asset holding period

4

(a) Name (b) Address

Enter the number of transactions reported on this form 

If you invested in the transaction through another entity, such as a partnership, an

S corporation, or a foreign corporation, identify the name and employer identification

number (EIN) (if any) of that entity 

5

Enter in columns (a) and (b) below, the name and address of each person to whom you paid a fee with regard

to the transaction if that person promoted, solicited, or recommended your participation in the transaction, or

provided tax advice related to the transaction.

Attachment

Sequence No. 137
Form 8886 (3-2003) Page 2

Form 8886 (3-2003)

Facts. Describe the facts of the transaction that relate to the expected tax benefits, including your

participation in the transaction.

7

Expected tax benefits. Describe the expected tax benefits, including deductions, exclusions from gross

income, nonrecognition of gain, tax credits, adjustments (or the absence of adjustments) to the basis of

property, etc. See instructions for more details.

8

Estimated tax benefits. Provide a separate estimate of the amount of each of the expected tax benefits

described above for each affected tax year (including prior and future years).

9
Back to Contents

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Borden D. Rosiak, the Chief Financial Officer of Crystallex International Corporation (the “registrant”), certify that:

1. Based on my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A  No.
4 for the year ended December 31, 2003 (“Form 20-F”), of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Based on my knowledge, the information contained in Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Date: March 16, 2005

/s/ Borden D. Rosiak
    Borden D. Rosiak
  Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crystallex International Corporation and will be retained by such corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 220 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 220

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the tax on 
   interest received by foreigners on certain portfolio investments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the tax on 
   interest received by foreigners on certain portfolio investments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) the following 
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are hereby repealed:
            (1) Section 871(h) (relating to repeal of tax on interest 
        of nonresident alien individuals received from certain 
        portfolio debt investments).
            (2) Section 881(c) (relating to repeal of tax on interest 
        of foreign corporations received from certain portfolio debt 
        instruments).
            (3) Section 1441(c)(9) (relating to exception for interest 
        income from certain portfolio debt investments).
    (b)(1) Paragraph (1) of section 871(a) of such Code is amended by 
striking out ``Except as provided in subsection (h), there'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``There''.
    (2) Subsection (a) of section 881 of such Code is amended by 
striking out ``Except as provided in subsection (c), there'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``There''.
    (3) Paragraph (2) of section 864(c) of such Code is amended by 
striking out ``section 871(a)(1), section 871(h), section 881(a), or 
section 881(c)'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``section 871(a)(1) or 
881(a)''.
    (4) Subsection (b) of section 2105 of such Code is amended--
            (A) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1),
            (B) by striking out ``and'' at the end of paragraph (2),
            (C) by striking out paragraph (3), and
            (D) by striking out ``and Certain Other Debt Obligations'' 
        in the subsection heading.
    (5) The last sentence of section 1442(a) of such Code is amended by 
striking out ``, the references in section 1441(c)(9) to sections 
871(h) and 871(h)(3) shall be treated as referring to sections 881(c) 
and 881(c)(3)''.
    (c) The amendments made by this section shall apply to interest 
received after the date of the enactment of this Act with respect to 
obligations issued after such date.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 22.1

                         REPORT OF INSPECTOR OF ELECTION

               ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF THERMA-WAVE, INC.

                                 AUGUST 23, 2004

In connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Therma-Wave, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the undersigned duly appointed
Inspector of Election, having taken an oath to conduct the election impartially,
hereby certifies:

      1.    That a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was held at
            the facilities of Therma-Wave, Inc., 1250 Reliance Way, Fremont,
            California, on Monday, August 23, 2004 at 11:00 a.m. pursuant to
            proper notice;

      2.    That before entering upon the discharge of my duties, I was sworn,
            and the oath so taken by me is attached hereto;

      3.    That I inspected the signed proxies used at the meeting and found
            the same to be in proper form;

      4.    The number of shares of Common Stock of the Corporation issued and
            outstanding at the close of business on June 17, 2004, the record
            date established by the Board of Directors of the Corporation for
            determining stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting was
            35,673,197.

      5.    Each share of Common Stock was entitled to one vote;

      6.    There were present in person or by proxy at said meeting,
            stockholders holding 28,294,458 shares of Common Stock, representing
            79.32% of the total number of shares outstanding and entitled to
            vote at the meeting, such percentage representing a quorum;

      7.    To the best of my knowledge, the proxies with respect to all shares
            voted by proxy holders were valid and in effect at the time of the
            meeting;

      8.    I received and tabulated the votes of the stockholders at said
            meeting;

      9.    The following persons received the number of votes for election as
            directors as set forth opposite their respective names:

            a. Peter R. Hanley                    27,797,111 shares "For"
            b. Nam Pyo Suh                        27,794,761 shares "For"
            c. Lawrence Tomlinson                 28,013,375 shares "For"

      10.   The following persons were duly elected as directors of the
            Corporation at said meeting:

                                 Peter R. Hanley
                                   Nam Pyo Suh
                               Lawrence Tomlinson

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd Day of August, 2004.

                                    /s/ Carol Lustenader
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Carol Lustenader
                                    Inspector of Election
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 1886

_____________________________
J OSHUA W ALTER F EAGLE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. David W. Fina , Judge

. May 31, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , C.J., and R OWE and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Joshua Walter Feagle, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheila Renee COLE, aka Kimberly Owens, Beverly Ann Hirsch, Sheila Royer, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-30448.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 *.

Filed Feb. 26, 2007.

Timothy J. Racicot, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Donahoe, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*644MEMORANDUM **

Sheila Renee Cole appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking her supervised release and imposing an 11-month prison sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cole contends that the district court abused its discretion in revoking her supervised release, in light of her testimony at her revocation hearing and her negative second drug test. We disagree.

Cole admitted at the revocation hearing that she did not follow her probation officer’s instruction not to associate with a person who had allegedly supplied her with methamphetamine. Further, Cole signed a form admitting to tampering with her first drug test, and to use of methamphetamine on June 3, 2006. The record supports the district court’s finding that Cole violated two conditions of her supervised release by failing to follow her probation officer’s instructions, and by failing to refrain from illegally possessing a controlled substance. *See United States v. Lomayaoma,*86 F.3d 142, 146 (9th Cir. 1996). The district court did not clearly err in declining to credit Cole’s testimony. *See Anderson v. City of Bessemer,*470 U.S. 564, 573, 575, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Cole’s supervised release. *See United States v. Ortuño-Higareda,*450 F.3d 406, 409 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**











**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
      M. Alexander, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











BY:
            /s/
                Andrew M. AlexanderAndrew
                M. AlexanderPresident/Chief
                Executive OfficerMay
                10, 2006











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Weingarten Realty Investors and will be retained by Weingarten and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2283

To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing suspension of duty

on nitro sulfon B.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1993

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing

suspension of duty on nitro sulfon B.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION ON

4 NITRO SULFON B.

5 Heading 9902.29.07 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

7 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.
2

•HR 2283 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

4 enactment of this Act.

5 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

7 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro8 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

10 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend11 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

12 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

13 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en14 actment of this Act;

15 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

16 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

17 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

18 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

19 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ