alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered February 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01300-CR

RAUL R. RICOY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-54024-P

ORDER

We GRANT Official Court Reporter Lisabeth Kellett’s January 29, 2013 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due THIRTY 

DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 13-2063

_____________

MICHAEL P. LEHTONEN,

Appellant

v.

GOVERNOR OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS; et al. 

______________

No. 13-2064

______________

MICHAEL P. LEHTONEN,

Appellant

v.

BRENDA J. HOLLAR; KATHLEEN MACKAY; JAMES CARROLL, III

______________

(D.C. Nos. 3-11-cv-00134, 3-12-cv-00012)

______________

ORDER

______________

At the direction of the Court the opinion and judgment entered in this matter on 

December 12, 2014 are hereby VACATED as being entered prematurely. A revised 

opinion and judgment shall be entered.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: December 15, 2014

JK/cc: All Counsel on Record
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2384

To extend until January 1, 1997, the previously existing suspension of duty

on certain chemicals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. PAYNE of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1997, the previously existing

suspension of duty on certain chemicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLY EXISTING SUSPEN4 SION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN CHEMICALS.

5 Each of the following headings of the Harmonized

6 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/96’’:

8 (1) Heading 9902.29.25 (relating to 4-Chloro9 2-nitroaniline).
2

•HR 2384 IH

1 (2) Heading 9902.29.42 (relating to 4-Chloro,5-

2 dimethoxyaniline).

3 (3) Heading 9902.29.45 (relating to 3,4-

4 Diaminophenetole,dihydrogen sulfate).

5 (4) Heading 9902.30.25 (relating to 6-

6 Hydroxy-2-napthoic acid).

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by section

9 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

10 enactment of this Act.

11 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec12 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

13 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro14 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

15 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

16 warehouse for consumption of goods to which any amend17 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

18 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

19 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en20 actment of this Act;

21 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

22 or a lower duty if such amendment had applied to such

23 entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as

24 though such entry or withdrawal had occurred on such

25 15th day.
3

•HR 2384 IH

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2564 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2564

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to apply reductions in water 
supply during dry years to agricultural water contractors within areas 
                               of origin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1993

  Mr. Fazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to apply reductions in water 
supply during dry years to agricultural water contractors within areas 
                               of origin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRY YEAR ALLOCATIONS.

    For any year in which the Secretary of the Interior determines that 
no interim water is available for Central Valley Project contractors 
within counties, watersheds, or other areas of origin, as those terms 
are utilized under California law, the Secretary is authorized and 
directed to allocate water supply, including any water shortage 
percentage reduction, to agricultural or municipal and industrial water 
contractors within those counties, watersheds, or other areas of origin 
on the basis of the greater of the amount of (1) project water under 
contract, or (2) historical use (including any interim or transferred 
water supply used) prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 
determined on a per contractor basis. This section shall only apply to 
those contractors which have a contract with the Secretary for Central 
Valley Project water that does not include a provision limiting the 
amount or percentage by which their water supply can be reduced for dry 
years.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31

FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION

I, James N. Ryan, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petroleum Development Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 4, 2003              
 /s/ James N. Ryan                                        

James N. Ryan

Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RENE RUIZ-MAYO,

Petitioner

v.

MARK GARMAN,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 95 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit
        32**
 **Certification
        of CEO and CFO**
 **Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of
        Crystallex International Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for
        the
        year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), Gordon Thompson, as President and Chief Executive Officer
        of the
        Registrant, and Hemdat Sawh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
        each
        hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
 
 
 /s/
          GORDON
          THOMPSON
 Name:
                Gordon
                    ThompsonTitle:
                President
                    and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                November
                    13, 2007
 
 
 /s/
          HEMDAT
          SAWH
 Name:
                Hemdat
                    SawhTitle:
                Chief
                    Financial OfficerDate:
                November
                    13, 2007
 This
        certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 25, 2021

No. 04-21-00043-CV

RCI ENTERTAINMENT (SAN ANTONIO), INC, d/b/a XTC Cabaret. (“XTC”),

Appellant

v.

THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Mayor Ron Nirenberg, and Michael E. Shannon, in their 

Official Capacities,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-23536

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due April 26, 2021; however, the court granted an 

extension of time until May 26. Appellant has filed a motion requesting an additional thirty days 

to file the brief. 

We grant the motion and order Appellant’s brief due June 25, 2021 (sixty days after the 

original due date). Appellant is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent 

a motion, filed before the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances 

justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the 

brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed 

by the requested extended deadline. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of May, 2021.

FILE COPY
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Oldacre McDonald, LLC, and Mark McDonald, et al. v. Mattress Firm, Inc. , et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 54 8

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 73196

Trial court: 151st District Court of H a rri s County

Th is case involves three sets of appellants challenging three different orders. Th e first set of appellants, Oldacre McDonald, LLC and Mark McDonald, filed a notice of appeal on June 21, 2018, from the tria l court’s June 4, 2018 order denying their special appearances. The second set of appellants, Quattro Development, LLC and Michael Liyeos, represented by different counsel, filed a notice of appeal also on June 21, 2018,

from the trial court’s separate Ju ne 4, 2018 order denying their special appearances. The third set of appellants, Madison Development Group LLC, represented by different counsel, filed a notice of appeal also on June 21, 2018, from the trial court’s separate June 4, 2018 order denying it s special appearance. The Clerk of this Court docketed all three notices of appeal under the same appellate cause number 01

- 18

- 00548

- CV.

On July 13, 2018, appellants Oldacre McDonald, LLC and Mark McDonald filed a letter in this Court requesting that the Clerk of this Court docket each appeal in its own appellate cause number . They contend that , although each order was signed on the same day, these appeals are not the “same case” because each set of appellants challenge a

different order which did not ad dress any other set of appellants. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 12.2. Appellants state that, although the appellees are opposed to this request , the other two sets of appellants are unopposed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.3(a)(2). On July 19, 2018, appellee

filed a l etter in opposition to appellants’ request contending that, because the orders were all signed on the same day arising from the same hearing , the notices of appeal were filed

in the same case

.

Although t hese three notices of appeal were from different orders , the se orders were all signed by the same district judge on the same day , June 4, 2018, arising from the samehearing that day and, thus, they were all filed in the “same case” and were properly assigned

to the same appellate cause number. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 12.2(c) (noting that “[a]ll notices of appeal filed in the same case must be given the same docket number.”); cf. Azteck Int’l Bus. Corp. v. UP Commn’s , Nos. 01

- 07

- 00907

- CV & 01

- 09

- 00544

- CV, 2009 WL 1958410, at *1 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] July 9, 2009, Order) (directing Clerk of this Court to assign separate appellate case number to later attempted statutory interlocutory appeal

of 2008 order separately from prior interlocutory appeal of 2007 order filed in same case). Accordingly, the Co urt construes th e appellants’ request as a motion to docket separate appeals and DENIES the appellants’ motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting for the Court

Date: J uly 26

, 2018
Document

Exhibit 4.12

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
AMYRIS, INC.
Amyris, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”),


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOLLOWING:


FIRST: That the name of the Corporation is Amyris, Inc.


SECOND:  That the date on which the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was originally filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware is April 15, 2010 under the name Amyris Biotechnologies, Inc.


THIRD:  That, at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), the Board duly adopted resolutions setting forth the following proposed amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, declaring said amendment to be advisable and directing the Corporation to submit said amendment to the next annual meeting of the stockholders of said Corporation for consideration thereof, and that, thereafter, pursuant to such resolutions, the Corporation submitted the amendment to the stockholders of the Corporation at such annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the Delaware General Corporation Law at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of said amendment:


Section 1 of Article IV of the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


“1. Total Authorized. The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the corporation has authority to issue is Three Hundred Fifty-Five Million (355,000,000) shares, consisting of two classes: Three Hundred Fifty Million (350,000,000) shares of  Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, and Five Million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value per share.”


FOURTH:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment of the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its General Counsel and Secretary this 29th day of May, 2020 and the foregoing facts stated herein are true and correct.


AMYRIS, INC.


By: /s/ Nicole Kelsey
Name: Nicole Kelsey
Title: General Counsel and Secretary
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*BRANDEN HOLLOWAY

*Mark Rademacher,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Rita M. Shair,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided July 14, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 117 Conn. App. 798 (AC 29051), is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2699 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2699

 To add the Sabine River Blue Elbow Unit and the Addition to the Lower 
    Neches River Corridor Unit to the Big Thicket National Preserve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1993

  Mr. Wilson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To add the Sabine River Blue Elbow Unit and the Addition to the Lower 
    Neches River Corridor Unit to the Big Thicket National Preserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION TO BIG THICKET NATIONAL PRESERVE.

      (a) Additions.--Subsection (b) of the first section of the Act 
entitled ``An Act to authorize the establishment of the Big Thicket 
National Preserve in the State of Texas, and for other purposes'', 
approved October 11, 1974 (16 U.S.C. 698), is amended--
            (1) by inserting `` and on the map entitled `Big Thicket 
        National Preserve', dated July 1993, and numbered 175-80009,'' 
        after ``175-80008,'';
            (2) by striking ``and'' at the end of the penultimate 
        undesignated paragraph relating to Big Sandy Corridor unit;
            (3) by striking the period in the ultimate undesignated 
        paragraph relating to Canyonlands unit and inserting in lieu 
        thereof a semicolon; and
            (4) by adding at the end thereof the following:
            ``Sabine River Blue Elbow unit, Orange County, Texas, 
        comprising approximately 3,592 acres; and
            ``Addition to the Lower Neches River Corridor unit, Orange 
        and Jasper Counties, Texas, comprising approximately 750 
        acres.''.
    (b) No Land Acquisition Without the Consent of the Owner; 
Authorization of Appropriations.--The first proviso of subsection (c) 
of the first section of such Act is amended by striking ``and 
Canyonlands units'' and inserting ``, Canyonlands, Sabine River Blue 
Elbow, and Addition to the Lower Neches River Corridor units''.
    (c) Publication of Boundary Description.--Not later than 6 months 
after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall 
publish in the Federal Register a detailed description of the boundary 
of the Sabine River Blue Elbow unit and the Addition to the Lower 
Neches River unit of the Big Thicket National Preserve.

                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). C el i s’ s r equestfor ora l ar g u m e n t is d e n ie d . NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T PA TRI CI A CELI S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72284 A ge nc yN o. A 074- 796- 158 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2011 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , C L IF T O N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P a tr i c i aC e l i s , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng her m ot i on t o reopen h er depo rt at i on proceedi ng s c on du ct ed i n absent i a. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to 

# FI LED APR15 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72284 2 r e ope n and r e vi e w de novo c l a i m s of due pr oc e s s vi ol a t i ons i n i m m i gr a t i on p r o c e e d in g s . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . T he agency di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng C el i s’ s m ot i on t o reopen a s unt i m e l ybe c aus e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d m or e than t e n y e ar s a f t e rthe i s s uanc e of th e A u g u s t 2 7 , 1 9 9 7 , inab s e n tiao r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 3 ( b ) ( 4 ) ( iii) , an dC e lis f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h s he a c t e d w i th the due di l i ge nc e r e qui r e d t o w arr antt ol l i ng of the 18 0-day f

i l i ng deadl i ne, s e e I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 897 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( e qu itab le to llin g is av a ilab le to p e titio n e rw h o is p r e v e n te df r o m f ilin g du e to dece pt i on , fr aud, or error, and exerci se s due di l i gence i n d i sc ov er i ng such c ir c u m s tan c e s ) . I t f

o llo w s th a t C e lis ’s du e p r o c e s s c la im f a ils . Se e La ta v . I

NS , 2 0 4 F .3 d1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 ( 9 thC ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . C e l i s ha s w a i ve d anyc ha l l e nge t o the a ge nc y ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha ts he r e c e iv e dp r o p e rn o tic e o f h e rh e ar in g . Se e M

a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1 2 5 9 - 6 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 6 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.