alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR                    OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999             JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,779                  16,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,498                   4,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (122)                   (345)
<INVENTORY>                                    223,837                 214,814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,689                 242,092
<PP&E>                                          77,791                  68,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,758)                (12,731)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 335,119                 319,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,450                 130,247
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            80                      80
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,386                  68,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   335,119                 319,435
<SALES>                                        658,047                  38,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               658,047                  38,825
<CGS>                                          503,912                  31,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  655,183                  46,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (353)                    (38)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,820                     525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,603)                 (8,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,185)                   (318)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,418)                 (8,005)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,418)                 (8,005)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)                  (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)                  (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer** **EXHIBIT 31.2**
     I, Lawrence J. Batina, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,2003 of Zila, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
Date: December 15, 2003
/s/ Lawrence J. Batina
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Christopher L.      Kolb                                              |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher L. Kolb,      President and principal financial officer  |   |
| November 13,      2009                                                    |   |

----
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10142

USDC No. 6:04-CR-40-ALL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESSE RAY WESTBROOK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

--------------------

O R D E R:

Jesse Ray Westbrook pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine

with intent to manufacture cocaine base. Westbrook’s plea

agreement contained a waiver-of-appeal provision. Appointed

counsel for Westbrook has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). If, on appeal, the Government does not seek to enforce

an appeal waiver, the waiver is not binding. United States v.

Story, 439 F.3d 226, 231 (5th Cir. 2006). However, in this case

the Government has not had an opportunity to address Westbrook’s

appellate waiver. 
O R D E R

No. 05-10142

-2-

“[I]t is defense counsel’s obligation to ascertain and

certify that the Government would rely on the defendant’s

appellate waiver before moving to withdraw.” United States v.

Acquaye, ___ F.3d ___, 2006 WL 1549951 at *2 (5th Cir. June 8,

2006). Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is DENIED without

prejudice to its renewal. Westbrook’s counsel is directed to

file a new Anders brief stating the Government’s position with

respect to the waiver or a brief on the merits of this appeal

within 30 days of the date of this order. See id.

/s/ W. Eugene Davis 

W. EUGENE DAVIS

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Clinton H. Howard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Clinton H. HowardClinton H. HowardChairman of the BoardandChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2003/s/    Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President - FinanceandChief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB/A, as amended, for the period ending March 31, 2003, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), the undersigned, constituting the chief executive
officer and the chief financial officer of Mega Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the issuer for the fiscal quarter then
ended.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 13, 2003 |  |  |  | MEGA GROUP, INC.
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------
|                      |  |  |  |                 
|                      |  |  |  |                 
|                      |  |  |  |                 



|                      |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2003 |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gary L. Pittman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PioneerCompanies, Inc. (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 1, 2004
/s/ Gary L. Pittman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,672
<PP&E>                                           9,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,002)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (31,002)
<SALES>                                        555,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               555,402
<CGS>                                           93,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  464,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4165]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Computer-Communications Research; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Computer-Communications Research 
(1192).
    Date/Time: March 1-2, 2001; 8:30 a.m.-6 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: John Cozzens, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Room 1145, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
292-8912.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals as a part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4165 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 99(b)



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



                                                       /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Gerald S. Blaskie
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       August 14, 2002
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODNEY JEROME WOMACK,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

D. SWINGLE, M.D./Chief Medical Officer,

High Desert State Prison; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 15075

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 00829

- JAM

- AC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019 **

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Rodney Jerome Womack appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious m edical

needs

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 15075

Washington v. L.A. Cty. Sheriff’s Dep’t , 833 F.3d 1048, 1054 (9th Cir. 2016). We

affirm.

The distr ict court properly denied Womack ’s motion to proceed IFP because

at the time Womack filed the complaint, he had filed three actions that qualified as

strikes, and he did not plausibly allege that he was “under imminent danger of

serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complain t. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);

Andrews v. Cervantes , 493 F.3d 1047, 1053, 1055

- 56 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing

the imminent danger exce ption to § 1915(g)).

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paris D. ST. JOHN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10869

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

Michael Gill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Adrienne Urrutia Wisenberg, Solomon L. Wisenberg PLLC, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Paris D. St. John raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 11228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4624]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 36 / Thursday, February 22, 2001 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 11228]]


                Executive Order 13204 of February 17, 2001

                
Revocation of Executive Order on Nondisplacement 
                of

                Qualified Workers Under Certain Contracts

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, it is hereby ordered that:

                Section 1. Executive Order 12933 of October 20, 1994, 
                which requires, with respect to contracts for public 
                buildings, that successive contractors offer a right of 
                first refusal of employment to employees of the prior 
                contractor, is revoked.

                Sec. 2. The Secretary of Labor (Secretary), the Federal 
                Acquisition Regulatory Council, and heads of executive 
                agencies shall promptly move to rescind any orders, 
                rules, regulations, guidelines, or policies 
                implementing or enforcing Executive Order 12933 of 
                October 20, 1994, to the extent consistent with law.

                Sec. 3. The Secretary shall terminate, effective today, 
                any investigations or other compliance actions based on 
                Executive Order 12933 of October 20, 1994.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 17, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-4624
Filed 02-21-01; 11:17 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P