alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


POSTAL REALTY
TRUST, INC.


2019 EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Amendment No. 1


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO.
1 (this "Amendment") to the Postal Realty Trust, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan")
is made by Postal Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), effective as of the Effective
Date (as defined below). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to
them in the Plan.


WHEREAS,
the Company previously adopted the Plan for the benefit of its eligible Participants;


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Article XVI, the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") may amend the Plan, provided
that approval by the Company's stockholders is required for any amendment to the Plan to the extent that such approval is required
by law or the rules of any exchange on which the shares of Common Stock are listed, including an amendment that materially increases
the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan;


WHEREAS,
the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan as set forth herein; and


WHEREAS,
this Amendment shall become effective upon the approval of this Amendment by the Company's stockholders at the annual meeting of
stockholders held on June 26, 2020 (the date of such approval, the "Effective Date").


NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the Effective Date:


		1.	Aggregate Limit. The first sentence of Section 5.02(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted in
its entirety and shall be replaced with the following:



The maximum aggregate number
of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under this Plan pursuant to the exercise of Options and SARs, the grant of Stock Awards
or Other Equity-Based Awards and the settlement of Performance Units and Incentive Awards is 1,291,584 shares, all of which may
be subject to incentive stock option treatment.


		2.	Incorporation. This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of
the Plan.



		3.	Force and Effect. Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect.
EXHIBIT
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


(SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PICO Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Hart,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:
      August 8, 2007





/s/
      John R. Hart


John
      R.
      Hart


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
















/s/
      Maxim C. W. Webb


Maxim
      C.
      W. Webb
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Clinton H. Howard, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RBC Life Sciences, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2007
/s/ Clinton H. Howard
Form 8908

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Energy Efficient Home Credit

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Information about Form 8908 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8908.

OMB No. 1545-1979

2015

Attachment 

Sequence No. 153

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number 

1a Enter the total number of qualified energy efficient homes including qualified 

energy efficient manufactured homes meeting the 50% standard that were 

sold or leased to another person for use as a residence during the tax year 

(see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a 

b Multiply line 1a by $2,000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1b 

2a Enter the total number of qualified energy efficient manufactured homes

meeting the 30% standard that were sold or leased to another person for 

use as a residence during the tax year (see instructions) . . . . . . . 2a 

b Multiply line 2a by $1,000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2b 

3 Energy efficient home credit from partnerships and S corporations (see instructions) . . . . . 3 

4 Add lines 1b, 2b, and 3. Partnerships and S corporations, report this amount on Schedule K. All 

others, report this amount on Form 3800, Part III, line 1p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 37718T Form 8908 (2015)
#### MORRIS PLAN COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA, Inc., v. CAUDILL.

No. 25928.

Jan. 22, 1935.

Yancey & Douglas, for plaintiff in error.

Walter & Hilpirt, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

On the 28th day of March, 1934, a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and the motion for new trial was filed on the 31st day of March, 1934, and on the 13th day of April, 1934, the minutes of the clerk show that the motion for new trial was overruled and 60 days given in which to make and serve case-made.

The last extension of that order was made on August 8, 1934, said order being recorded at page 83 of the case-made, and 45 days was given “from the 11th day of August, 1934” in which to serve the case-made. The last day provided in that order expired with the 25th day of September, 1984, and the case-made was not served upon, the defendant in error until the 26th day of September, 1934. This court has repeatedly held that a case-made not served within time of the valid order of the court is a nullity, and where the errors complained of can only be reviewed by the proper presentation of such case-made, the appeal will be dismissed. Saddler v. Chappelle, 163 Okla. 102, 21 P. (2d) 761; Sautbine v. Johnson, 163 Okla. 121, 20 P. (2d) 1038; Collins-Dietz-Morris Co. v. Wright, 163 Okla. 54, 20 P. (2d) 574.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2481

To provide funding for an examination of the possible health effects of

exposure to depleted uranium of United States military personnel in

the Persian Gulf War.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1993

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. CLEMENT, and

Mr. BUYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide funding for an examination of the possible health

effects of exposure to depleted uranium of United States

military personnel in the Persian Gulf War.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Persian Gulf War

5 Radiation Research Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. GRANT TO SUPPORT DEPLETED URANIUM STUDY.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall

8 make a grant of $1,600,000 annually for fiscal years 1994

9 through 1998 to an institution selected through estab-
2

•HR 2481 IH

1 lished acquisition procedures for the purpose of studying

2 the possible health effects of battlefield exposure to de3 pleted uranium, including exposure through ingestion, in4 halation, or bodily injury.

5 (b) FUNDING SOURCE.—Funding for the grant under

6 subsection (a) shall be made from amounts appropriated

7 to the Department of Defense for fiscal years 1994

8 through 1998 for research, development, test, and evalua9 tion.

10 SEC. 3. RESEARCH PROGRAM.

11 Research to be conducted at the facility for which a

12 grant is made under subsection (a) shall explore the pos13 sible health effects of exposure to depleted uranium, in14 cluding exposure through ingestion, inhalation, or bodily

15 injury, and the individual susceptibility of service person16 nel to such exposure. Such research shall focus on (but

17 not be limited to) persons who may have been exposed to

18 depleted uranium while serving on active duty in the thea19 ter of operations during the Persian Gulf War. The spe20 cific objectives of the study shall include—

21 (1) assessment of the toxico-kinetic properties

22 of the various chemical forms of depleted uranium

23 that could be inhaled, ingested, or imbedded;
3

•HR 2481 IH

1 (2) examination of whether there are depleted

2 uranium cancer induction mechanisms similar to

3 those observed in Thorotrast-specific liver cancers;

4 (3) determination of whether the radiogenic ef5 fects noted in paragraphs (1) and (2) occur and if

6 so, at what fragment densities and latent periods;

7 (4) assessment of long-term, low-dose-rate irra8 diation of specific tissues, such as those of the nerv9 ous system;

10 (5) determination of the potential for chronic

11 nephrotoxicity as a function of the organ exposed to

12 depleted uranium; and

13 (6) conduct of pathological studies of tissue

14 surrounding depleted uranium particles.

15 SEC. 4. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

16 The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress

17 an annual report in fiscal years 1995 through 1999 on

18 activities under this Act during the preceding year.

Æ
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SCI Engineered Materials, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald
      S. BlaskieVice
      President and Chief Financial Officer ofSCI
      Engineered Materials, Inc.(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)November
      3, 2009
#### Jamal A. AZEEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kristen L. KELLER, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney; Lawrence Frail, Chief Prosecuting Attorney; Bruce K. Lazenby, Former Prosecuting Attorney; Francis M. Curnutte, III, Attorney at Law; Cedric Robertson, Police Officer; David H. Cook, Police Officer; Billy Cole, Chief of Police; John Hutchinson, County Judge; Janice B. Davis, Clerk of Court, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1515.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 1, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 25, 2011.

*686Jamal A. Azeez, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin John Robins on, Chip E. Williams, Pullin, Fowler, Flanagan, Brown & Poe, PLLC, Beckley, West Virginia; Francis M. Curnutte, III, Farmer, Cline & Campbell, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; John Michael Hedges, Teresa Jean Lyons, Byrne, Hedges & Lyons, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamal A. Azeez seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for expungement of criminal records. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Azeez seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Azeez’s motions to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Order entered August 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01577-CV

WAYNE A. RAND, Appellant

V.

DOROTHY DENNISE RAND, Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-1306590

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s “notice of extension request and notice of cause for extension” 

and ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than September 3, 2015. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MAY
3, 1997 AND THE BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MAY 3, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,943
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    184,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               328,400
<PP&E>                                         171,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 639,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           349
<OTHER-SE>                                     439,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   639,276
<SALES>                                        240,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,742
<CGS>                                          144,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         237,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,153,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,419,331
<PP&E>                                     108,843,304<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,430,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,650,027
<BONDS>                                     83,716,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   136,386,360
<OTHER-SE>                               (149,108,026)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,430,990
<SALES>                                     45,456,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,456,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               64,014,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (767,063)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (14,838,193)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (34,163,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (34,386,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (34,386,247)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)
<FN>
<F1>Property, plant and equipment represents net amounts
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133651 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133651 COA: 275142 Ingham CC: 04-001469-FH DETEAISE AFOAN JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 22, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.

t0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
#### Charles W. REED, III, a/k/a Dwight Devane Byrd, a/k/a Dwight Byrd, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lehrman DOTSON, Warden; Dwight Johnson, Security Chief; Tyrone Croder, Major; Phlonda Peay, Captain; Timothy Woodrum, Lieutenant; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant; Alford Dailey, R.N.; Jerry Tomlin, Officer; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees, and Warden McAc; Officer Tomlin, Defendants.

No. 10-7099.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 26, 2011.

Charles W. Reed, III, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Phillip M. Pickus, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Reed, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to enforce a settlement agreement, in which he alleged that the Defendants breached the settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Reed’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Reed v. Dotson,*No. 1:05-cv-01216-CCB (D.Md. July 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Global Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
      Anastasios N. Kyriakides, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
      and
      Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C.


Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to our knowledge:




a)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and b) The information contained in this Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.




***Signed
              :***/s/
              Anastasios N. Kyriakides***Anastasios
              N. Kyriakides******Chairman
              of the Board and Chief Executive Officer***/s/
              Bill Rodriguez***Bill
              Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer******October
              1, 2007***