alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:May 15, 2007By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with § 71.5 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on January 3, 2001.[1] 

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output.  To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with a reduction of the federal funds rate to an average of around 6 percent.

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, February 2, 2001.

Donald L. Kohn,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting of January 3, 2001, which include the domestic policy directive issued at that meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.  The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 01-4339 Field 2-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gerald S. BlaskieGerald S. BlaskieVice President and Chief Financial Officer of Superconductive Components, Inc. (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)August 7, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10Q for the period ending March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      1,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,838
<PP&E>                                          76,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,292
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,131
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                       979
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       999
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<FN>
<F1>Disclosure not required on interim financial statements.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Raul CHAPA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40265

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*380Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Raul Chapa-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>0000912084
<NAME>IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. - 1993 REVISED
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1993
<CASH>                                          27,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         791,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 740,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        513,943
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   740,120
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,820
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (12,487)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 Form 10-Q / A
 þ
    
    AMENDED QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2005.
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2005 TO MARCH 31, 2005.
 Commission File number: 0-17680 (formerly 33-20255)
 SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II, L.P.
  Delaware
    
    
    
    23-2498841(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)incorporation or organization)
 
 615-834-0872
 þ o
 o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1  Financial StatementsItem 2  Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Item 3. Controls and ProceduresPART II  OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1  Legal ProceedingsItem 2  Changes in SecuritiesItem 3  Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesItem 4  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersItem 5  Other InformationItem 6  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-KSIGNATUREEx-31.1  Section 302 Certification of the PEO & PFOEx-32.1  Section 906 Certification of the PEO & PFO    Table of Contents  
  
   
  Background
  Results of Operations for First Quarter of 2005 Compared with First Quarter of 2004
 rd
   Liquidity and Capital Resources




---



##### Table of Contents








---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K)
 Exhibit Numbers
    
    Description
    
    Page Number31.1
    
    Certification Pursuant to section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1
    
    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Richard W. Sorenson
    
    President,
    
    July 29, 2005Richard W. Sorenson
    
    Southern ManagementGroup, LLC




---



##### Table of Contents



SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II, LP
   
 A.
    
    ACCOUNTING POLICIES
  B.
    
    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
  2005
    
    
    2004Reimbursements
    
    $
    560
    
    
    $
    675
#### Robert P. BEAUDETTE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, Respondent.

No. 2007-3133.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2007.

Robert P. Beaudette, pro se.

*994ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                     AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and
entered into by and between FTP Software, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the
"Company"), and Peter R. Simkin ("Employee"), effective as of the 15th day of
December, 1996.

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee have entered into an Employment Agreement
dated as of the Effective Time (as defined in that certain Amended and Restated
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 21, 1996, among the Company,
Firefox Acquisition Corp. and Firefox Communications Inc.), as amended by
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement effective as of August 22, 1996 (as so
amended, the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to further amend the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby agree as follows:

1. AMENDMENTS. Section 5.g.i. of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the
words "to two times" immediately before the words "the greater of" appearing in
the seventh line thereof.

2. EFFECT ON AGREEMENT. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as a sealed instrument by
the Company, by its duly authorized representative, and by Employee, effective
as of the date first above written.

EMPLOYEE:                               FTP SOFTWARE, INC.


                                        By:
-----------------------------------        ----------------------------------
         Peter R. Simkin                   Glenn C. Hazard
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Neal Ludeke
-----------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P.,
general partner of the Company
February 13, 2003
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











As
      independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
      incorporation of our report which contains an explanatory paragraph relating
      to
      substantial doubt with respect to the Company’s ability to continue as a going
      concern, dated February 16, 2006 relating to the  financial
      statements of Symbollon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the years ended December
      31,
      2005 and 2004, included in this Form 10-K into the Company’s previously filed
      Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-86704, 333-30467, 333-30359
      and 333-80368) and Form SB-2 (File Nos. 333-109772 and 333-124687).








/s/Vitale,
      Caturano & Company, Ltd.





VITALE,
      CATURANO & COMPANY, LTD.








March
      31,
      2006


Boston,
      Massachusetts
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 13a0581n.06

No. 12-6147

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RICKY HUGHES,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE WESTERN

DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE: BOGGS and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; MURPHY, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Ricky Hughes appeals his sentence.

Hughes pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced him to 37 months in prison, to be followed by two years

of supervised release. While Hughes was serving his term of supervised release, a probation officer

filed a petition in the district court, alleging that Hughes violated the conditions of his supervised

release by participating in an armed robbery and kidnapping, using marijuana, and failing to comply

with the requirements of his drug-treatment program. The district court conducted a revocation

hearing and determined that Hughes committed the alleged violations.

Based on his Grade A violation and his criminal history category of V, Hughes’s guidelines

range of imprisonment was 30 to 37 months. He was subject, however, to a statutory maximum

The Honorable Stephen J. Murphy III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District *

of Michigan, sitting by designation.
No. 12-6147

United States v. Hughes

sentence of 24 months, which became the guidelines range. The district court revoked Hughes’s

supervised release and sentenced him to 24 months in prison.

On appeal, Hughes argues that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district

court failed to consider the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and failed to

adequately explain the basis for the sentence. We review sentences imposed following revocation

of supervised release under an abuse-of-discretion standard for reasonableness, which has both a

procedural and a substantive component. United States v. Kontrol, 554 F.3d 1089, 1092 (6th Cir.

2009). A sentence may be procedurally unreasonable where a district court fails to consider the 

§ 3553(a) factors or fails to adequately explain the chosen sentence. Gall v. United States, 552

U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

Hughes’s sentence is procedurally reasonable. In imposing the sentence, the district court

considered the applicable guidelines range and explained that a significant sentence was necessary

due to the number of violations, the serious nature of Hughes’s conduct, and the fact that he is a

danger to the public. The court was not required to explicitly consider each of the § 3553(a) factors,

and, given the straightforward nature of the case and the imposition of a within-guidelines sentence,

the court’s explanation of the sentence was sufficient. See United States v. Duane, 533 F.3d 441,

451-52 (6th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, we affirm the sentence.

-2-
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

February 22, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00881

- CV

THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

,

Appellant

v.

Elena HERRERA

, Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Co urt No. 2017

- CI

- 10253 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appell ee ’ s unopposed m otion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRA NTED. Time is extended to March 18, 2019.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of February, 2 019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Cou rt
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
 
                                  ALUMAX INC.
 
                     CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                  (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     YEAR ENDED          YEAR ENDED          YEAR ENDED
                                                  DECEMBER 31, 1996   DECEMBER 31, 1995   DECEMBER 31, 1994
                                                  -----------------   -----------------   -----------------
<C>    <S>                                        <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Primary earnings per common share:
   1.  Net earnings.............................       $ 250.0             $ 237.4             $  46.7
   2.  Deduct -- Series A Convertible Preferred
         dividends..............................          (9.3)               (9.3)               (9.3)
                                                       -------             -------             -------
   3.  Earnings applicable to common shares.....       $ 240.7             $ 228.1             $  37.4
                                                       =======             =======             =======
   4.  Average primary shares outstanding (in
         thousands).............................        46,409              45,200              44,757
   5.  Primary earnings per common share (line 3
         divided by line 4).....................       $  5.19             $  5.05             $  0.84
                                                       =======             =======             =======
Fully diluted earnings per common share:
   6.  Earnings applicable to common shares.....       $ 240.7             $ 228.1             $  37.4
   7.  Add -- Series A Convertible Preferred
         dividends..............................           9.3                 9.3                 9.3
                                                       -------             -------             -------
   8.  Earnings applicable to common shares.....       $ 250.0             $ 237.4             $  46.7
                                                       =======             =======             =======
   9.  Average fully diluted shares outstanding
         (in thousands).........................        55,251              54,846              54,440
  10.  Fully diluted earnings per common share
         (line 8 divided by line 9).............       $  4.53             $  4.33             $  0.84(A)
                                                       =======             =======             =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(A) Antidilutive, therefore the same as primary.