alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2283 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2283

To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing suspension of 
                        duty on nitro sulfon B.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1993

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing suspension of 
                        duty on nitro sulfon B.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION ON NITRO SULFON B.

    Heading 9902.29.07 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 
on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been no duty or a lower duty 
if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or 
withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
withdrawal had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,789,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,909,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,698,987
<PP&E>                                     124,148,108
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,429,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,519,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 111,519,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,519,209
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,784,688
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,512,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,578,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
U.S. flag
    An official website of the United States government
     Here’s how you know Here’s how you know **Official websites use .gov**  A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 About FSA
  Ask USDA
  Contact Us
  Forms
 Menu
  close
   Home
    Programs & Services
     ARC/PLC Program
         Civil Rights
         Certified Mediation Program
         Climate Adaptation Plan
         Conservation Programs
         Cooperative Agreements
         Dairy Margin Coverage Program
         Disaster Assistance Programs
         Economic & Policy Analysis
       Emergency Relief 
         Environmental & Cultural Resource Compliance
         Farm Bill Home
         Farm Labor Stabilization & Protection Pilot Grants
         Farm Loan Programs
         Financial Management Information
         Increasing Land Access
         Initiatives
       Laws and Regulations
         Margin Protection Program for Dairy
         Market Facilitation Program
         MIDAS
         Organic Certification Cost Share Program
         Outreach & Education
         Payment Eligibility
         Price Support
         Rice Production Program
    State Offices
    Online Services
     LDP
         eARC/PLC
         Farmers.gov (FSA Farm+)
         FSA Online Data Resources
         Loan Assistance Tool
    Newsroom
     Fact Sheets
         News Releases
         Emergency Designations
         Stakeholder Information
         eFOIA
       Meetings & Events
         Public Service Announcements
         County Committee Elections
         Fence PostSearch small Search
 Maine State Events
 Section Topics
     Maine Home
     County Offices
     County PCP Data
     Daily LDP Rates
     Programs
     Newsletters
     State Events
     State News Releases
     Resources
 State Executive Director Sherry Hamel  Read Sherry Hamel'
 State Office Address 967 Illinois Ave.Suite 2
Bangor, ME04401(207) 990-9140
 FY 2022 Calendar of Events 2022 Schedule Forthcoming for Questions please call 1-207-990-9140. DateEvent InformationLocation  Other Dates to Remember None at this time
 Home
   Programs & Services
   State Offices
   Online Services
   Newsroom
 Farmers.gov
          USA.gov
          USDA.gov
          Whitehouse.gov
       Accessibility Statement
          Common Questions
          Freedom of Information Act
       No FEAR Report
          Information Quality
          Non-Discrimination Statement
       Policies and Links
          Privacy Policy
          Sitemap
    Sign up for updates
      Subscribe
 Farm Service Agency
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
 facebook-loFacebook
 youtube-loYouTube
 twitter-loTwitter
 gov-delivery-loTwitter
 rss-loRSS
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-434-CV

MILLER TRUCK LINES, INC.	APPELLANT	

	V.

PETER MULLER 	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.1 OF PARKER COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  HOLMAN, DAUPHINOT, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  April 24, 2008
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, Tammy G. Hedge,
certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Hollywood
Media Corp.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | [Intentionally omitted];
| | -- | ------------------------



| | 4. | [Intentionally omitted]; and
| | -- | ----------------------------



| | 5. | [Intentionally omitted].
| | -- | ------------------------



|Date:  April 30, 2012 | By: | /s/ Tammy G. Hedge                                                                                               
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Tammy G. Hedge, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal financial and accounting officer)
# FY17_Q1

# Percent Positives - User Notes
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2559

AMENDMENTS
In the Senate of the United States,

March 24 (legislative day, February 22), 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 2559) entitled ‘‘An Act to designate the Federal

building located at 601 East 12th Street in Kansas City,

Missouri, as the ‘Richard Bolling Federal Building’ ’’ do pass

with the following

AMENDMENTS:

Page 2, after line 5, insert:

1 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States Courthouse located at Ninth and

3 Locust Streets in Kansas City, Missouri, shall be known

4 and designated as the ‘‘Charles Evans Whittaker United

5 States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 4. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the courthouse

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference
2

HR 2559 EAS

1 to the ‘‘Charles Evans Whittaker United States Court2 house’’.

Amend the title so as to read: An Act to designate

the Federal building located at 601 East 12th Street in

Kansas City, Missouri, as the ‘‘Richard Bolling Federal

Building and the United States Courthouse located at

Ninth and Locust Streets, in Kansas City, Missouri, as

the ‘‘Charles Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse’’.

Attest:

Secretary.
# FY18Q1

# FY18Q2

# FY18Q3

# FY18Q4

# PFGE - User Notes
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-51068

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAXIMINO CERDA-TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CR-359-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maximino CerdaTorres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cerda-Torres has notfiled a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-51068 Document: 00511205938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
#### MILAVETZ, GALLOP & MILAVETZ, P.A., et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 08-1119.

June 8, 2009.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,400
<INVENTORY>                                    195,078
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               360,402
<PP&E>                                         182,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 676,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          215,301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           350
<OTHER-SE>                                     396,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   676,433
<SALES>                                      1,053,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,053,806
<CGS>                                          741,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,036,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,655
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,838
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2489

To confer jurisdiction on the United States Claims Court with respect to

land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1993

Mr. SKEEN (for himself and Mr. SCHIFF) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To confer jurisdiction on the United States Claims Court

with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JURISDICTION.

4 Notwithstanding sections 2401 and 2501 of title 28,

5 United States Code, and section 12 of the Act of August

6 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1052), or any other law which would

7 interprose or support a defense of untimeliness, jurisdic8 tion is hereby conferred upon the United States Claims

9 Court to hear, determine, and render judgment on any

10 claim by Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico
2

•HR 2489 IH

1 against the United States with respect to any lands or in2 terests therein the State of New Mexico or any adjoining

3 State held by aboriginal title or otherwise which were ac4 quired from the tribe without payment of adequate com5 pensation by the United States. As a matter of adequate

6 compensation, the United States Claims Court may award

7 interest at a rate of 5 percent per year to accrue from

8 the date on which such lands or interests therein were ac9 quired from the tribe by the United States. Such jurisdic10 tion is conferred only with respect to claims accruing on

11 or before August 13, 1946, and all such claims must be

12 filed within three years after the date of enactment of this

13 Act. Such jurisdiction is conferred notwithstanding any

14 failure of the tribe to exhaust any available administrative

15 remedy.

16 SEC. 2. CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT APPLICABLE.

17 Any award made to any Indian tribe other than the

18 Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico before, on,

19 or after the date of the enactment of this Act, under any

20 judgment of the Indian Claims Commission or any other

21 authority, with respect to any lands that are the subject

22 of a claim submitted by the tribe under section 1 shall

23 not be considered a defense, estoppel, or set-off to such

24 claim, and shall not otherwise affect the entitlement to,

25 or amount of, any relief with respect to such claim.
3

•HR 2489 IH

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         253,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,054,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                   725,693
<INVENTORY>                                  6,780,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,956,497
<PP&E>                                      11,774,573
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,270,842)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,247,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,188,078
<BONDS>                                      5,620,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,682
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,247,723
<SALES>                                      6,947,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,983,822
<CGS>                                        3,631,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,553,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             176,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (745,450)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   283,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (462,180)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)



</TABLE>
#### Rodney Terrance MURRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Leroy CARTLEDGE, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7719.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

Rodney Terrance Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Terrance Murray seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Murray has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral *192argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET  OF EAT AT  JOE'S  LTD.  AS OF JUNE  30,  1999  AND  THE  RELATED
STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS  THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         105
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  34
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               692
<PP&E>                                         7254
<DEPRECIATION>                                 626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1793
<BONDS>                                        1343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     4844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7982
<SALES>                                        1938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1938
<CGS>                                          688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (673)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)



</TABLE>