10916 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2001 / Notices

Eligible Applicants: An eligible

applicant is any state or general unit of

local government, public or private

agency, educational institution,

organization, team or individual with

the requisite skills to successfully meet

the outcome objectives of the project.

Review Considerations: Applications

received under this announcement will

be subjected to an NIC three to five

member Peer Review Process.

Number of Awards: One (1).

Executive Order 12372: Project is not

subject to the provisions of this

Executive Order.

NIC Application Number: 01C02. This

number should appear as a reference

line in the cover letter and also in box

11 of Standard Form 424.

The Catalog of Federal Domestic

Assistance number is: 16.602.

Dated: February 12, 2001.

Morris L. Thigpen,

Director, National Institute of Corrections.

[FR Doc. 01–4075 Filed 2–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–36–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of January, 2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number of

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–38,451; Chicago Lock, Pleasant

Prairie, WI

TA–W–38,419; John Campbell & Co.,

Inc., Perkasie, PA

TA–W–37,917; Dana Corp., Spicer

Heavy Axle & Brake Div., Marion

Forge, Marion, OH

TA–W–38,382; Cherokee Finishing Co.,

Spartan International, Gaffney, SC

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–38,197; Grandoe Corp (The),

Gloversville, NY

TA–W–38,488; Cone Decorative

Fabarics, New York, NY

TA–W–38,332; Pronav Ship

Management, Inc., Greenwich, CT

TA–W–38,548; Timberland Logging,

Ashland, OR

TA–W–38,506; Homestake Mining Co.,

Sparks, NV

TA–W–38,449; Hasbro Manufacturing

Service, El Paso, TX

TA–W–38,473; Software Spectrum, Inc.,

Garland, TX

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–38,240; Ashby Industries, Inc.,

Martinsville, VA

TA–W–38,517; Cooper Standard

Automotive, Fluid Systems Div.,

Mio, MI

TA–W–38,396; Philips Electronics North

America Corp., Philips Display

Components Co., Ottawa, OH

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–38,490; Latrobe Brewing Co.,

Latrobe, PA

TA–W–38,431; Warm Springs Forest

Products Industries, Warm Springs,

OR

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location of each

determination references the impact

date for all workers of such

determination.

TA–W–38,385; Findlay Industries,

Morrison Div., Morrison, TN:

November 22, 1999.

TA–W–38,297; Qwik Tool

Manufacturing, Magna Div.,

Lexington, KY: September 7, 1999.

TA–W–38,366; Jeld Wen, Inc., Bend

Millwork Co., Bend, OR: November

7, 1999.

TA–W–38,394; Velvac, Inc., New Berlin,

WI: November 24, 1999.

TA–W–38,260 & A; Austin Apparel,

Lancaster Plant, lancaster, KY &

Springfield Plant, Springfield, KY:

October 18, 1999.

TA–W–38,280 & A; Snyder Walls

Industries, Inc., Snyder, TX & Walls

Industries, Inc., Boaz, AL: October

25, 1999.

TA–W–38,198; Crown Cork and Seal

Co., Inc., Plant #31, Perrysburg, OH:

October 6, 1999.

TA–W–38,485; Forecaster of Boston,

Boston, MA: December 7, 1999.

TA–W–38,504; Warren Logging, Gold

Hill, OR: December 12, 1999.

TA–W–38,482; Augusta Sportswear,

Inc., Millen Plant, Millen, GA:

December 6, 1999.

TA–W–38,425; Ameripol Synpol Corp.,

Port Meches, TX: November 30,

1999.

TA–W–38,497; EGS/O–Z Gedney,

LaGrange, GA: December 14, 1999.

TA–W–38,541; Ametek, United States

Gauge Div., Bartow, FL: December

21, 1999.

TA–W–38,514; Nutone, Inc., Coppell,

TX: December 21, 1999.

TA–W–38,299; Originals Bi-Judi, Inc.,

Tolleson, AZ: October 31, 2000.

TA–W–38,084; Philips CSI, Inc.,

Lancaster, PA: August 14, 1999.

TA–W–38,393; Tyco Electronics,

Automotive Electronics,

Chesterfield, MI: November 22,

1999.

TA–W–38,281; Five Rivers Electronic

Innovations, LLC, Greenville, TN:

October 23, 1999.

TA–W–38,357; Jockey International,

Inc., Belzoni, MS: November 9,

1999.

TA–W–38,409; Money’s Foods U.S., Inc.,

Money’s Mushrooms LTD, Blandon,

PA: December 1, 1999.

TA–W–38,426; Universal Furniture

Limited, Marion, NC: November 30,

1999.

TA–W–38,241; Micromatic Textron,

Holland, MI: October 10, 1999.

TA–W–38,544; Bausch & Lomb,

Sarasota, FL: December 27, 1999.

TA–W–38,257; Pine State Knitwear Co.,

Inc., Stateville, NC: October 13,

1999.

TA–W–38,518; Beltex Corp., Claiborne

Plant, New Tazewell, TN: December

20, 1999.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2001 / Notices 10917

TA–W–38,411; Miller Shingle Co., Inc.,

Enterprise Lumber Div., Arlington

Sawmill, Arlington Reman/Planer

Mill, Arlington OSO Sawmill Plant,

Arlington, WA: November 30, 1999.

TA–W–38,480; Delevan Spray

Technologies, Monroe, NC:

December 26, 1999.

TA–W–38,421 & A, B; Wiscassett Mills

Co., Kannapolis, NC, Concord, NC

and Albermarle, NC: November 29,

1999.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of January

2001.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) that a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) that sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) that imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases in imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) that there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–04295; Jeld Wen, Inc.,

Bend Millwork Co., Bend, OR

NAFTA–TAA–04348; John Campbell &

Co., Inc., Perkasie, PA

NAFTA–TAA–04382; Chicago Lock,

Pleasant Prairie, WI

NAFTA–TAA–04216; Ashby Industries,

Inc., Martinsville, VA

NAFTA–TAA–04356; Ameripol Synpol

Corp., Port Nechs, TX

NAFTA–TAA–04266; Originals Bi-Judi,

Inc., Tolleson, AZ

NAFTA–TAA–04357; Oxford

Automotive, Argos, IN

NAFTA–TAA–04290; Central Industries

of Indiana, Inc., Greenwood,

Arkansas Div., Greenwood, AR

NAFTA–TAA–04423; Tensolite

Interconnect Systems, Essex Jct.,

Vermont

The investigation revealed that the

criteria for eligibility have not been met

for the reasons specified.

NAFTA–TAA–04453; Sacramento Bag

Manufacturing Co., Sacramento, CA

NAFTA–TAA–04386; Hasbro

Manufacturing Services, El Paso,

TX

The investiation revealed that workers

of the subject firm did not produce an

article within the meaning of Section

250(a) of the Trade Act, as amended.

NAFTA–TAA–04358; Warm Springs

Forest Lumber Products Industries,

Warm Springs, OR

NAFTA–TAA–04401; Latrobe Brewing

Co., Latrobe, PA

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production, or both, of such firm or

subdivision did not decrease during the

relevant period.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–04340; Findlay

Industries, Morrison Div., Morrison,

TN: November 22, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04311; Cooper-Standard

Automotive, Fluid Systems Div.,

Mio, MI: November 9, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04400; Respiratory

Support Products, Inc., Irvine, CA:

October 30, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04264 & A; Austin

Apparel, Lancaster Plant,

Lancaster, KY & Springfield Plant,

Springfield, KY: October 18, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04381; Warren Logging,

Gold Hill, OR: December 14, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04424; Robert Bosch

Corp., Bosch Automotive Motors,

Hendersonville, TN: January 3,

2000.

NAFTA–TAA–04396; Augusta

Sportswear, Inc., Millen Plant,

Millen, GA: December 6, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04336; Philips Electronics

North America Corp., Philips

Display Components Co., Ottawa,

OH: November 10, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04330; Davidson Cotton

Co., Abouchar Div., Brooklyn, NY:

November 27, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04379; ABC–NACO, Inc.,

National Castings Div., Melrose

Park, IL: December 13, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04331; Tyco Electronics,

Automotive Electronics,

Chesterfield, MI: November 20,

1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04363; Sherwood Dash

USA, Rancho Cucamonga, CA:

December 4, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04391; Screw Machine

Technologies, Inc., ‘‘SMT, Inc.’’,

Georgetown, KY: November 22,

1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04247; Pine State

Knitwear Co., Inc., Statesville, NC:

October 13, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04349; Miller Shingle Co.,

Inc./Enterprise Lumber Div.,

Arlington Sawmill, Reman/Planer

Mill, OSO Sawmill Plant, Arlington,

WA: November 30, 1999.

NAFTA–TAA–04342; Daws

Manufacturing Co., Inc., Pensacola,

FL: November 25, 1999.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of January,

2001. Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC 20210 during normal business hours

or will be mailed to persons who write

to the above address.

Dated: February 1, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01–4124 Filed 2–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–38,276]

Coach; A Subsidiary of Sara Lee

Corporation, Medley, FL; Amended

Certification Regarding Eligibility To

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the

U.S. Department Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

December 4, 2000 applicable to workers

of Coach, Medley, Florida. The notice

was published in the Federal Register

on December 21, 2000 (65 FR 80458).