alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Mikohn Gaming Corporation 

Las Vegas, Nevada

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theProspectus constituting a part of the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-73506, 333-07441, 333-30525, 333-30605 and 333-120327) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-110623) of Mikohn Gaming Corporation of our reports dated February 22, 2005relating to the consolidated financial statements and, the effectiveness of Mikohn Gaming Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting which appears in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 11, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         302,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  276,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,723,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,356,250
<PP&E>                                         850,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,268,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,102,599
<BONDS>                                        787,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,537
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,364,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,268,496
<SALES>                                      5,020,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,020,098
<CGS>                                        1,345,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,345,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (205,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (205,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (205,868)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
MICHAEL C. HILLIARD , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Elizabeth W. Hanes, Magistrate Judge . ( 3:17

- cr - 00044

- HEH

- EWH

- 1 )

Submitted : June 29, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael C. Hilliard , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Michael C. Hilliard seeks to appeal from the magistrate judg e’s order denying his motion to appoint counsel in his underlying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 (b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Hill i ard seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No.333-21173), (Form S-3/A No. 333-38219), (Form S-3/A No. 333-57855), (Form S-3/A No. 333-68209),(Form S-3/A No. 333-48380), (Form S-3/A No. 333-64262), (Form S-3 No. 333-91090), (Form S-3/A No.333-113531) and (Form S-3 No. 333-130903) of Hollywood Media Corp. and in the related Prospectuses,in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-14659) and (Form S-8 No. 333-45098) pertaining tothe 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the Directors Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No.333-62152) pertaining to the Hollywood Media Corp. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, 401(k) Plan and theDirector’s Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-114176) pertaining to the Hollywood Media Corp. 2000Stock Incentive Plan as Amended October 30, 2003 and the Hollywood Media Corp. Directors StockOption Plan as Amended May 1, 2003 and (Form S-8 No. 333-124559) pertaining to the Hollywood MediaCorp. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated March 14, 2007 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Hollywood Media Corp. and of ourreport dated March 14, 2007with respect to Hollywood Media Corp. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Hollywood Media Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2006./s/ Kaufman Rossin & Co., P.A.Miami, Florida
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The National Bank of Indianapolis
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Morris L. Maurer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/   Morris L. Maurer
-----------------------------------
Morris L. Maurer
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and not for any other purpose, and is subject to the knowledge
standard contained in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LabOne, Inc.

 

LabOne, Inc.

Date:  August 9, 2005
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
Exhibit 4.1




---



##### 



AMERISTAR
CASINOS, INC.
 THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO
SO REQUESTS, A STATEMENT OF THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE,
PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL, OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES
THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRCITIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR
RIGHTS.
  TEN COM
    
    
    
    as tenants in common
    
    UNIF GIFT MIN ACT 
    
    
    
    Custodian(Cust)
    
    
    
    (Minor)TEN ENT
    
    
    
    as tenants by the entireties
    
    under Uniform Gifts to MinorsJT TEN
    
    
    
    as joint tenants with right
    
    
    
    Actof survivorship and not as
tenants in common
    
    
    
    
    
    (State)
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Dated:
[No. 35169-2-II.

Division Two.

August 21, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Louis Gabe Armijo, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 01-1-04764-9, Stephanie A. Arend, J., entered July 14, 2006. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2336 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2336

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore a 100 percent 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1993

 Ms. Lambert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore a 100 percent 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FULL DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED 
              INDIVIDUALS BEGINNING IN 1992.

    (a) Deduction Made Permanent.--Subsection (l) of section 162 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health 
insurance costs of self-employed individuals) is amended by striking 
paragraph (6).
    (b) Deduction Increased to 100 Percent.--Paragraph (1) of section 
162(l) of such Code is amended by striking ``25 percent'' and inserting 
``100 percent''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of section 110 of the Tax 
Extension Act of 1991 is amended by striking paragraph (2).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2538 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2538

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 
  waiting period for divorced spouse's benefits following the divorce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 1993

Mr. Hughes (for himself and Mrs. Lowey) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 
  waiting period for divorced spouse's benefits following the divorce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE'S 
              BENEFITS FOLLOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR RECEIPT 
              OF SPOUSE'S BENEFITS.

    (a) Wife's Insurance Benefits.--Section 202(b)(5)(A) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(b)(5)(A)) is amended by striking ``divorced 
wife--'' and all that follows through ``shall be entitled'' and 
inserting ``divorced wife meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 
through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled''.
    (b) Husband's Insurance Benefits.--Section 202(c)(5)(A) of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 402(c)(5)(A)) is amended by striking ``divorced husband--'' 
and all that follows through ``shall be entitled'' and inserting 
``divorced husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) through 
(D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled''.
    (c) Exemption From Deductions on Account of Work.--Section 
203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 403(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2)(A) Except as'' and all that follows 
        through ``the benefit to which'' and inserting the following: 
        ``(2) In any case in which any of the other persons referred to 
        in paragraph (1)(B) is entitled to monthly benefits as a 
        divorced spouse under subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for 
        any month, the benefit to which''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with respect to 
benefits for months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superconductive Components,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald S. Blaskie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ Gerald S. Blaskie
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Gerald S. Blaskie
                                             Chief Financial Officer of
                                             Superconductive Components, Inc.
                                             May 10, 2005
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:August 19, 2008By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of County Bank Corp on
        form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), I Curt Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The Information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ Curt Carter
---------------
Curt Carter
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2509 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2509

    To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on ortho aminophenol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1993

 Mr. Quillen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on ortho aminophenol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
      

       ``  9902.31.12  Ortho aminophenol (provided for in subheading 2922.29.50)  Free             No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                                                                                                                                      31/94           ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse consumption, on or after the 15th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4061]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decrees Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on January 5, 2001, a proposed consent 
decree in United States v. Reland Mark Johnson, Civ. Action No. 01-CV-
005 (D.WY) was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
District of Wyoming.
    In this action, the United States is recovering past response 
costs, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. in 
connection with the R. J. Refinery Site located in La Barge, Wyoming. 
The consent decree that was lodged would resolve the United States' 
claims against Reland Mark Johnson (``Johnson''). Johnson will pay to 
the United States $5,000 to resolve claims against him and the 
settlement is based on Johnson's limited financial resources. The 
consent decree includes covenants not to sue by the United States under 
section 107 of CERCLA.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, PO 
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044, Department 
of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United States v. 
Johnson, D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-07235. The proposed consent decree may be 
examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, 2120 Capitol Ave. 
Cheyenne, WY, and at U.S. EPA Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Denver, CO 
80202-2405. A copy of the consent decree may also be obtained by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 
Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611. In requesting a copy, please 
enclose a check in the amount of $4.25 (25 cents per page reproduction 
cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bob Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-4061 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tiere SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50287.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 14, 2014.

Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Evan John Davis, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kurt J. Mayer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tiere Smith appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Smith contends that the district court violated his right to due process by basing the sentence on misleading and unreliable information regarding his prior federal sentence. We review for plain error, *United States v. Vanderwerfhorst, 576*F.3d 929, 934 (9th Cir.2009), and find none. The record reflects that the district court sentenced Smith consistent with the requirements of due process. *See id.*at 935-36 (to establish due process violation at sentencing, defendant must show that his sentence was “demonstrably” based on information that lacked “some minimal indi-cium of reliability beyond mere allegation”) (internal quotations omitted). The district court did not rely on false or unreliable information when it referred to Smith’s previous sentence as “lenient,” and it properly based the sentence on Smith’s continuing pattern of criminal conduct, failure to be deterred, danger to the community, and breach of the court’s trust. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); *United States v. Miqbel,*444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.