alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Arturo MARTINEZ-ESCALONA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73099.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2011.

Gary Finn, Law Offices of Gary Finn, Indio, CA, for Petitioner.

R. Alexander Goring, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, OIL, Washington, DC, Michelle Gorden Latour, Esquire, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Home*28land Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arturo Martinez-Escalona, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Tapia v. Gonzales,*430 F.3d 997, 999 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Martinez-Escalona was ineligible for cancellation of removal because he failed to meet the seven-year continuous physical presence requirement. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2) (requiring seven years of continuous residence after having been “admitted in any status”); *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(A) (defining “admitted” as “the lawful entry of an alien into the United States after inspection and authorization by an immigration officer.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/            Steven      E. Brown |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Steven      E. Brown                                                                            |   |
|   | Vice      President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer                                         |   |
|   | August      11, 2010                                                                            |   |

----
Exhibit 11.1

                            CHARTWELL RE CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Year ended December 31,
                                                            ------------------------------------------------
                                                                1996              1995              1994

<S>                                                         <C>               <C>               <C>          
Historical income (loss) attributable to common shares      $     20,989      $      6,239      $     (4,978)
Pro forma adjustments (1)(2) .........................                                                 1,837
                                                            ------------      ------------      ------------
Adjusted income (loss) attributable to common shares .      $     20,989      $      6,239      $     (3,141)
                                                            ============      ============      ============

Primary:
Weighted average common shares outstanding (3) .......         9,081,867         3,755,312         3,760,685
                                                            ============      ============      ============
Income (loss) per common and common
  equivalent share ...................................      $       2.31      $       1.66      $      (0.84)
                                                            ============      ============      ============

Fully diluted:
Weighted average common shares outstanding ...........         9,081,867         3,755,312         3,760,685
                                                            ============      ============      ============
Income (loss) per common equivalent share
  assuming full dilution .............................      $       2.31      $       1.66      $      (0.84)
                                                            ============      ============      ============
</TABLE>


(1)  Pro forma adjustments include the effect of (i) the sale of the 10.25%
     Senior Notes issued by the Company on March 17, 1994, (ii) the retirement
     of the entire principal amount of indebtedness outstanding under the senior
     term loan, (iii) the preferred stock conversions and (iv) the exercise of
     the Common Stock Warrants.

(2)  The pro forma adjustments exclude a non-recurring charge for the write-off
     of the unamortized balance of the deferred financing costs resulting from
     the early extinguishment of the senior term loan. Such charge was
     approximately $465,000 after tax. Also excluded is a $753,000 charge for a
     cash payment to the holders of the Common Stock Warrants upon conversion.

(3)  Common equivalent shares from the exercise of stock warrants and options
     have not been included as their effect on earnings per share would be
     antidilutive.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Financial Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 as amended herein fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 as amended herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Philip W. RoizinPhilip W. RoizinExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration, Treasurer and Secretary and Chief Financial Officer




Dated: December 15, 2004
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT VALUATION FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-134623, 333-134559, 333-108023,
333-75862, 333-64943, 333-32186, and 333-123152) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-155352, 333-148455,
333-148454, 333-136937, 333-118065, 333-106388, 333-101908, 333-99739, 333-65385, 333-65383,
333-60168, 333-60152, 333-54140, 333-49522, 333-32178, 333-25707, 333-124210, 333-126225 and
333-132248) of Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated as of December 31, 2008 relating to the valuation of financial securities which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/HOULIHAN SMITH & COMPANY INC. Houlihan Smith & Company Inc.
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2009


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          31,817
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,425
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,912
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    795
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    22.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    22.47
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2 

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Rexford C. Decker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
#### INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California nonprofit religious corporation and Emil Beca, one of its individual members, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a California municipal corporation and Stephen Yee, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-56660.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued Dec. 4, 2007.

Submitted April 7, 2014.

Filed April 7, 2014.

David M. Liberman, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

John M. Werlich, Law Offices of John M. Werlich, Westlake Village, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: PREGERSON, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER & MEMORANDUM *

On June 11, 2008, we withheld submission of this case pending final resolution of proceedings in *International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles,*530 F.3d 768 (9th Cir.2008).

On July 7, 2010, we issued an order in *International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles,*386 Fed.Appx. 669 (9th Cir.2010), reversing the district court’s summary judgment order in favor of Plaintiff and remanding the case to the district court to consider in the first instance Plaintiffs remaining federal constitutional claim. Because *International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles,*No. 01-56579, 530 F.3d 768, has been resolved, this case is resubmitted, and the judgment entered in *International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles,*No. 01-56579, 530 F.3d 768, applies to this appeal. The mandate should issue forthwith.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2252

To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension of duty on mercuric

oxide.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1993

Mr. GRANDY (for himself and Mr. NUSSLE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension

of duty on mercuric oxide.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON MERCURIC OXIDE.

5 Heading 9902.28.25 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

7 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/96’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

10 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from
2

•HR 2252 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec4 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

5 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro6 priate customs officer before the 180th day after the date

7 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

8 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend9 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

10 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

11 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en12 actment of this Act;

13 and with respect to which there would have been a lower

14 duty if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to

15 such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or

16 reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had oc17 curred on such 15th day.

Æ
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.7.5      Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association Change in
                    Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment
                    between Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association and
                    Dwight L. Wilson dated July 1, 1999.



               QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                     RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Participant:          Dwight L. Wilson
                    -----------------------------------------



The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 17, 1999, the Board of Directors of Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association acted to renew and extend the Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association Change in Control Agreement with the
undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30,
2001.


Dated this ___1st___ day of ____July____, A.D., ______1999_______.



                                     QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
                                     ASSOCIATION



   /s/ Dwight L. Wilson              By:  /s/ Frederic R. McGill
------------------------             --------------------------
Participant                          President
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 287

- CR
IN RE Torreon LUCHEY Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 11, 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On April 19, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial
court’s failure to rule on various pro se motions. However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court fo r which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- CR

- 393 6 , styled State of Texas v. Torreon Luchey , pending in the 399 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez

- Gardner presiding.04

- 11

- 00287

- CR

- 2

- on r elator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( a). Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Form 8910

(Rev. January 2021)

Alternative Motor Vehicle Credit

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8910 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-1998

Attachment 

Sequence No. 68

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

Note:

• Use this form to claim the credit for certain alternative motor vehicles.

• Claim the credit for certain plug-in electric vehicles on Form 8936.

Part I Tentative Credit

Use a separate column for each vehicle. If you need more columns, use 

additional Forms 8910 and include the totals on lines 7 and 11. (a) Vehicle 1 (b) Vehicle 2 

1 Year, make, and model of vehicle . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 Vehicle identification number (see instructions) . . . . . 2

3 Enter date vehicle was placed in service (MM/DD/YYYY) . . 3

4 Tentative credit (see instructions for amount to enter) . . . 4

Next: If you did NOT use your vehicle for business or investment purposes and did not have a credit from a partnership or 

S corporation, skip Part II and go to Part III. All others, go to Part II.

Part II Credit for Business/Investment Use Part of Vehicle 

5 Business/investment use percentage (see instructions) . . . 5 % %

6 Multiply line 4 by line 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

7 Add columns (a) and (b) on line 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

8 Alternative motor vehicle credit from partnerships and S corporations (see instructions) . 8

9 Business/investment use part of credit. Add lines 7 and 8. Partnerships and S corporations, 

stop here and report this amount on Schedule K. All others, report this amount on Form 3800, 

Part III, line 1r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Part III Credit for Personal Use Part of Vehicle 

10 If you skipped Part II, enter the amount from line 4. If you 

completed Part II, subtract line 6 from line 4 . . . . . . 10

11 Add columns (a) and (b) on line 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

12 Enter the amount from Form 1040, 1040-SR, or 1040-NR, line 18 . . . . . . . . 12

13 Personal credits from Form 1040, 1040-SR, or 1040-NR (see instructions) . . . . . 13

14 Subtract line 13 from line 12. If zero or less, enter -0- and stop here. You cannot claim the

personal use part of the credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

15 Personal use part of credit. Enter the smaller of line 11 or line 14 here and on Schedule 3

(Form 1040), line 6. Check box c on that line and enter “8910” in the space next to that 

box. If line 14 is smaller than line 11, see instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 37720F Form 8910 (Rev. 1-2021)
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2458

For the relief of Livio B. Colosimo.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1993

Mr. CLINGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

For the relief of Livio B. Colosimo.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF.

4 For the purpose of the inscription on any headstone

5 or marker that may be provided under section 2306 of

6 title 38, United States Code, for Livio B. Colosimo of

7 Bradford, Pennsylvania, Livio B. Colosimo shall be

8 deemed to have held the grade of second lieutenant in the

9 United States Army Air Corps at the time of his discharge

10 from the Armed Forces on December 13, 1944.
2

•HR 2458 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

2 No benefits other than the benefits referred to in sec3 tion 1 shall accrue by reason of the enactment of this Act.

Æ