alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 12, 2001, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Spray Drift Task Force has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Cenex/Land O'Lakes Agronomy Company, previously named Agro Distribution, LLC, Sioux City, UT, has requested its membership name changed to Agrialiance, LLC. Also, Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, NJ has been dropped as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Spray Drift Task Force intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 15, 1990, Spray Drift Task Force filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 1990 (55 FR 27701).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 1, 2000. A notice has not yet been published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-4701 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with 
the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as Ocean 
Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to 
section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 
and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.
    Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicant: Bianca R. Lopez, 227 W. Grand Avenue, El Segundo, CA 90245, 
Sole Proprietor.

    Dated: February 16, 2001.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4421 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EXHIBIT 18.1

LOGO

March 10, 2008

Board of
Directors

Progressive Gaming International Corporation

920
Pilot Road

Las Vegas, NV 89119

Dear Board of Directors:

Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Progressive Gaming International Corporation included in its Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007 describes a change regarding the date of the Companys annual goodwill impairment assessment from the last day of the fiscal third quarter to the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter. There are no authoritative criteria
for determining which date is preferable based on the particular circumstance; however, we conclude that such change is acceptable and, based on your business judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in your
circumstances.

Very truly yours,

LOGO

LOGO
Exhibit 21

Storage USA, Inc.
Subsidiaries

All subsidiaries are organized under Tennessee law unless otherwise indicated.

Direct

Storage USA Trust (Maryland)
SUSA Partnership, L.P.
Huron Acquisition, Inc.

Indirect

SUSA Management, Inc.
441 Mini-Storage Partners, Ltd. (Florida)
Buzzman Partners I Ltd. Partnership (Pennsylvannia)
Buzzman Partners II, Ltd. Partnership (Pennsylvannia)
Clarendon Storage Associates Ltd Partnership (Virginia)
Cole/Morgan, Ltd (Texas)
Dade County Mini-Storage Associates, Ltd. (Florida)
Parklawn Storage Partners, LP
Preston Self Storage, Ltd. (Texas)
Prospect Heights Self Storage, LLC (Illinois)
Southeast Mini-Storage Limited Partners (Florida)
Storage Partners of Okeechobee, Ltd (Florida)
Storage Partners of Paoli, LP
Storage USA Franchise Corp.
Storage USA of Palm Beach County Ltd. Partnership (Maryland)
Sunset Mini-Storage Partners, Ltd. (Florida)
SUSA Hackensack LP
SUSA Harrison LP
SUSA Hollywood, LP
SUSA Investments II, LLC (Virginia)
SUSA Investments I, LLC (Virginia)
SUSA Management, Inc.
SUSA Mesa L.P.
SUSA Nashville L.P.
SUSA Orange LP
SUSA Secaucus LP
SUSA/38th Avenue, Capitola LP (California)
SUSA/Poplar Partners, LP
Tamiami Mini-Storage Partners, Ltd. (Florida)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20310

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK ANTHONY CHRIESTMON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-95-193-2

- - - - - - - - - -

May 1, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Anthony Chriestmon has appealed his sentence, based on a

guilty plea, of possessing cocaine base with intent to distribute

it. There is no merit to his contention that he was denied an

opportunity to render substantial assistance to the Government,

which would have entitled him to a motion for a downward departure

from the range provided by the Sentencing Guidelines. See United

States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc),
cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995). Furthermore, the provision

in the plea agreement that the Government had complete discretion

whether to file a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion for leniency did not

nullify the plea agreement. See United States v. Price, 95 F.3d

364, 367-68 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Chriestmon is not entitled to relief on grounds that the

Government failed to prove that the cocaine base involved was crack

cocaine. See United States v. Ayala, 47 F.3d 688, 690 (5th Cir.

1995) (adoption of the presentence report by the court); Calverley,

37 F.3d at 162-164 (plain error standard). Finally, Chriestmon’s

contention that his sentencing under the enhanced-penalty provision

for cocaine base denied him due process lacks merit because one

panel of this court cannot overrule an earlier panel decision. See

United States v. Fike, 82 F.3d 1315, 1326 (5th Cir.)(citing

precedent upholding crack/powder discrepancy in sentencing

guidelines), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 241, 242 (1996), 65 U.S.L.W.

3631 (1997); Brown v. United States, 890 F.2d 1329, 1336 (5th Cir.

1989). 

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2576

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide an exclusive right to

perform sound recordings publicly by means of digital transmissions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 1, 1993

Mr. HUGHES (for himself and Mr. BERMAN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide an exclusive right to perform sound recordings publicly by means

of digital transmissions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Digital Performance

5 Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS IN COPYRIGHTED WORKS.

7 Section 106 of title 17, United States Code, is

8 amended—

9 (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ‘‘and’’ after

10 the semicolon;
2

•HR 2576 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (5) by striking the period and

2 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform

5 the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital

6 transmission.’’.

7 SEC. 3. SCOPE OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS IN SOUND RECORD8 INGS.

9 Section 114 of title 17, United States Code, is

10 amended—

11 (1) by striking subsections (a), (c), and (d); and

12 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘(b)’’.

13 SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

14 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 101 of title 17, United

15 States Code, is amended by inserting after

16 ‘‘A ‘device’, ‘machine’, or ‘process’ is one now

17 known or later developed.’’ the following:

18 ‘‘A ‘digital transmission’ of a performance is a

19 communication of the performance by any device or

20 process whereby sounds in a digital format are re21 ceived beyond the place from which they are sent.’’.

22 (b) LIMITATIONS ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS: SECOND23 ARY TRANSMISSIONS.—Section 111(a) of title 17, United

24 States Code, is amended in the first sentence by striking

25 ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘Except in the case of a performance
3

•HR 2576 IH

1 of a sound recording in the course of a digital trans2 mission, the’’.

3 (c) LIMITATIONS ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS: SECOND4 ARY TRANSMISSIONS OF SUPERSTATIONS AND NETWORK

5 STATIONS FOR PRIVATE HOME VIEWING.—Section

6 119(a)(1) of title 17, United States Code, is amended by

7 striking ‘‘Subject to’’ and inserting ‘‘Except in the case

8 of a performance of a sound recording in the course of

9 a digital transmission, and subject to’’.

Æ
NO. 07-10-00369-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

LONNIE MOORE, APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; 

NO. 2010-460,904; HONORABLE LARRY B. "RUSTY" LADD, JUDGE 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 Appellant Lonnie Moore appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding her guilty 

of assault and sentencing her to 365 days of imprisonment. Appellant filed notice of 

appeal on September 22, 2010. The clerk’s record was received and filed on November 

17. The reporter’s record was due on December 15. By letter of January 3, 2011, this 

Court advised the reporter that the appellate record was late and directed the reporter to 

advise the Court of the status of the appellate record on or before January 13. As of 

this date, the court reporter has failed to comply with the directive of the Court. 
2 

 Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for 

further proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). On remand, the trial court shall 

utilize whatever means necessary to determine the following: 

1. Why the reporter has not responded to the Court’s directive; 

2. Why the reporter’s record has not been filed; 

3. When this Court can expect the record to be filed; and 

4. Whether an alternative or substitute reporter should or can be appointed to 

complete the record in a timely manner. 

The trial court shall cause any hearings to be transcribed. In addition, the trial 

court shall (1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing 

issues, (2) cause a supplemental clerk's record to be developed containing its findings 

of fact and conclusions of law and any orders it may issue relating to this matter, and (3) 

cause a reporter's record to be developed transcribing the evidence and arguments 

presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any. The trial court shall then file the 

supplemental clerk's record and any reporter's record transcribing the hearing with the 

clerk of this court on or before February 25, 2011. Should further time be needed by the 

trial court to perform these tasks, same must be requested before February 25, 2011. 

It is so ordered.

 Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
OMB No. 1545-1800 Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement Form 8886

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Number, street, and room or suite no.

a

b

c

1a Name of reportable transaction 1b Tax shelter registration number (11-digits) (if any)

2 Identify the type of reportable transaction. Check the box(es) that apply (see instructions).

Form 8886 (Rev. 6-2004)

 Attach to your tax return.

Cat. No. 34654G

Listed transaction

Confidential transaction

6

If the transaction is a “listed transaction” or substantially similar to a listed transaction, identify the listed

transaction (see instructions)  

3

 See separate instructions.

(Rev. June 2004)

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

City or town, state, and ZIP code

Transaction with contractual protection

d

e

f

Loss transaction

Transaction with significant book-tax difference

Transaction with brief asset holding period

4

(a) Name (b) Address

Enter the number of transactions reported on this form 

If you invested in the transaction through another entity, such as a partnership, an

S corporation, or a foreign corporation, identify the name and employer identification

number (EIN) (if any) of that entity 

5

Enter in columns (a) and (b) below, the name and address of each person to whom you paid a fee with regard

to the transaction if that person promoted, solicited, or recommended your participation in the transaction, or

provided tax advice related to the transaction.

Attachment

Sequence No. 137
Form 8886 (Rev. 6-2004) Page 2

Printed on recycled paper Form 8886 (Rev. 6-2004)

Facts. Describe the facts of the transaction that relate to the expected tax benefits, including your participation

in the transaction. For listed transactions identified in item 2a, also provide the complete name, address, and

nature of involvement of all parties to the transaction (see instructions).

7

Expected tax benefits. Describe the expected tax benefits, including deductions, exclusions from gross income,

nonrecognition of gain, tax credits, adjustments (or the absence of adjustments) to the basis of property, etc.

(see instructions for more details).

8

Estimated tax benefits. Provide a separate estimate of the amount of each of the expected tax benefits

described above for each affected tax year (including prior and future years).

9
1

NUMBER 13-20-00196-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

CLAUDIO CHAVEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

MARIA ROCHA, APPELLEE.

On Appeal from the 150th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina 

Order Per Curiam

The case is before the Court on a motion to remand case back to trial court. The 

Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the motion, is of 

the opinion that the motion should be construed as a motion to abate the appeal pending 
2

entry of the settlement and should be granted.

The motion to abate the appeal pending settlement is GRANTED and this appeal 

is ordered ABATED until January 11, 2021.

The Court directs appellants to file, on or before January 11, 2021, either (1) a 

motion to reinstate the appeal, accompanied by appellant’s brief in this matter, or (2) a 

motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this the

18th day of December, 2020.
[No. 35601-5-II.

Division Two.

September 5, 2007.]

#### Hudson Company, Inc., *Respondent,*v. Donald C. King et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 05-2-02440-4, Theodore F. Spearman, J., entered October 27, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Van Deren, A.C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and Penoyar, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION
906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Symbollon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Paul C. Desjourdy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
March 31, 2010     /s/ Paul C.
Desjourdy


Paul C.
Desjourdy


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          71,745
<SECURITIES>                                     1,566
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,064
<PP&E>                                         325,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   314,303
<SALES>                                        446,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               446,003
<CGS>                                          179,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  425,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (9,567)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,982
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.20
        

</TABLE>
ALLIED Life Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS For
                the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                             <C>                <C>                    <C> 
                                                    1996              1995                  1994

Primary

Net income                                       $8,072,591        $9,712,482             $8,556,624
Preferred stock dividends                        (1,601,089)       (1,493,249)            (1,330,493)
                                                 ----------        ----------             ----------
Adjusted net income                              $6,471,502        $8,219,233             $7,226,131
                                                 ==========        ==========             ==========

Earnings per share                               $     1.41        $     1.78             $     1.58

Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                             4,580,148         4,613,207              4,576,950


Fully Diluted

Net income                                       $8,072,591         $9,712,482              $8,556,624
Preferred stock dividends                        (1,601,089)        (1,493,249)             (1,330,493)
                                                 ----------         ----------              ----------
Adjusted net income                              $6,471,502         $8,219,233              $7,226,131
                                                 ==========         ==========              ==========

Earnings per share                               $      1.41        $     1.78              $     1.58


Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                              4,580,148         4,613,207               4,576,950


</TABLE>






The  common  stock   equivilents   are  not  entered  into  earnings  per  share
computations because they would not have a dilutive effect.
                                      102