alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
$10,000,000
    
    March 31, 2008 (the Effective Date)
  Schedule 1 Borrower Borrowers FCMC Bank Forbearance Agreement Existing Note
 Note
   PROMISE TO PAY
 Principal Sum




---



##### 



INTEREST
   MANNER OF PAYMENT; PRINCIPAL BALANCE
   2




---



##### 



SECURITY
  DEFAULT
  GENERAL PROVISIONS
  3




---



##### 



[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
 4




---



##### 



BORROWERS:Each Borrower listed on Schedule 1 attached hereto:By:
    
    /s/ Alexander Gordon JardinName: Alexander Gordon Jardin
Title: Chief Executive Officer, as an authorized officer of,
and on behalf of, each such Borrower listed on Schedule 1
attached hereto
 THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE BORROWERS UNDER THIS SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED PROMISSORY NOTE ARE
GUARANTEED BY FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION PURSUANT TO A GUARANTY DATED DECEMBER 28, 2007
IN FAVOR OF THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK.
 REAFFIRMATION AND CONSENT OF GUARANTOR
 Bank
 FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Thomas J. Axon

Thomas J. AxonTitle:
    
    President
 Signature Page to Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note (D Note)




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Franklin Subsidiaries
 
 1




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Franklin Subsidiaries
 
 2




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Franklin Subsidiaries
 
 3




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Franklin Subsidiaries
 
 4




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Franklin Subsidiaries
 
 5




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Franklin Subsidiaries
 
 
 6




---



##### 



SCHEDULE 1
    
    Franklin Subsidiaries
 
 7
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
      (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
      general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
      Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.






/s/
      David
      Salzman





David
      Salzman


Chief
      Executive Officer of Richman Tax


Credit
      Properties Inc., general partner of


Richman
      Tax Credit Properties L.P., general


partner
      of the Registrant


March
      28,
      2008
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Income Growth Management, Inc., a California corporation
and the General Partner of Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited
partnership, does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004 of Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited partnership, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California
limited partnership.


Date:  November  12, 2004            /s/ David W. Maurer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     David W. Maurer, Chief Executive Officer


Date:  November  12, 2004            /s/ Timothy C. Maurer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Timothy C. Maurer, Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30594 Summary Calendar

RONALD WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-3864-D

-------------------- November 24, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronald Williams, Louisiana prisoner # 100849, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Williams contends that thedistrict court erred by dismissing his § 2254 petition as timebarred. A COA is GRANTED with regard to the issue whether his § 2254 petition was time-barred. Williams’ second state habeas application, even if dismissedNo. 98-30594 -2-

by the state courts as repetitive of his first habeas application, was properly filed and thus tolled the applicable limitation period. See Villegas v. Johnson , 184 F.3d 467, 472-73 (5th Cir. 1999). With the benefit of the resulting tolling, Williams’ federal habeas petition was filed within the limitations period established by the AEDPA. See Flanagan v. Johnson , 154 F.3d 196, 199-200 (5th Cir. 1998)(state prisoners seeking to challenge convictions which became final prior to April 24, 1996, have a one-year “grace period” within which to file); Fields v. Johnson , 159 F.3d 914, 916 (5th Cir. 1998) (tolling provision of § 2244(d)(2) applies to “grace period”). Williams’ second state habeas application was filed on March 18, 1996, and remained pending until the Louisiana Supreme Court denied Williams a supervisory writ on September 5, 1997. Therefore the limitations period was tolled until September 5, 1997, when the one-year statute of limitations began to run. Williams’ petition, filed December 11, 1997, was thus within the applicable one-year period. Accordingly, COA is GRANTED, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.
COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L.
Pittman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 16, 2004                 /s/ Gary L. Pittman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Gary L. Pittman
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-01-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     86,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,659
<PP&E>                                          16,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (83,820)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,820
<SALES>                                        496,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               496,264
<CGS>                                          110,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  392,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7546
FERNANDO M. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1926-AW) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fernando M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. United States , No. CA-97-1926-AW (D. Md. Aug. 27, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Rand Enterprises, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912BU-10-C-0039 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59801

Terence Murphy, Esq. Karla J. Soloria, Esq. Christopher T. Page, Esq.

Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. Norfolk, VA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney James D. Mirynowski, Esq. Amanda G. Phily, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Philadelphia OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STEMPLER The parties have settled their dispute and requested that the Board enter judgment in favor ofappellant. Itis the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $804,000.00. Interest shall be paid on this amount pursuantto 41 U.S.C. § 7109 from 1June2015 until date ofpayment. Dated: 13 January 2016

(Signatures continued) Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I concur

Administrative udge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59801, Appeal ofRand Enterprises, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel Telephone Conference, “A History of Medicine—Volume-IV Medieval Medicine.”                    

*Date:*                         February 21, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, Division of Extramural Programs, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Milton Corn, MD, Associate Director, Office of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, One Rockledge Centre, Suite 301, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 6075, Bethesda, MD 20892-6075, (301) 496-4621.                     

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

      ( print page 11305)    
Dated: February 13, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4459 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2601

To redesignate the Environmental Protection Agency as the Department

of Environmental Protection.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 1, 1993

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To redesignate the Environmental Protection Agency as the

Department of Environmental Protection.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Envi5 ronmental Protection Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC7 TION AGENCY AS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON8 MENTAL PROTECTION.

9 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Environmental Protec10 tion Agency is redesignated as the Department of Envi-
2

•HR 2601 IH

1 ronmental Protection, and shall be an executive depart2 ment in the executive branch of the Government.

3 (b) SECRETARY OF THE ENVIRONMENT.—There

4 shall be at the head of the Department a Secretary of the

5 Environment who shall be appointed by the President, by

6 and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

7 (c) TRANSFER OF FUNCTION, POWERS, AND DU8 TIES.—The functions, powers, and duties of each officer

9 and employee of the Environmental Protection Agency are

10 transferred to and vested in the corresponding officer or

11 employee of the Department.

12 (d) DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY.—The Secretary

13 may, consistent with other laws—

14 (1) delegate any functions, powers, or duties,

15 including with respect to the making of regulations,

16 to such officers and employees of the Department as

17 the Secretary may designate; and

18 (2) authorize such successive redelegations of

19 such functions within the Department as the Sec20 retary considers to be necessary or appropriate.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 10.1

                               BSB Bancorp, Inc.
                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
                                       TO
             1996 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AND CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN


  RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Section 6.01 is amended by substituting
the figure "1,300,000" for the figure "875,000".

  RESOLVED, that the last sentence of Section 7.02 is deleted and replaced by 
the following sentence: "Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum number of 
shares of Common Stock subject to Options that may be granted under the Plan to 
any Employee in any Plan Year is 100,000 shares (subject to adjustment as 
provided in Article X hereof).

  This Amendment Number 2 was duly adopted and approved by the Board of
Directors of BSB Bancorp, Inc. by resolution at a meeting held on the 25th day
of January, 1999.


                                       /s/ Larry G. Denniston
                                       ----------------------
                                       Larry G. Denniston
                                       Corporate Secretary


  This Amendment Number 2 was duly approved by the shareholders of BSB Bancorp,
Inc. at a meeting held on the 26th day of April, 1999.


                                       /s/ Larry G. Denniston
                                       ----------------------
                                       Larry G. Denniston
                                       Corporate Secretary
2009-1214.

#### Franz v. Martin.

Cuyahoga App. No. 92211, 2009-Ohio-2378.
#### INDIANA STATE POLICE PENSION TRUST, et al. v. CHRYSLER LLC et al. Center for Auto Safety et al. v. Chrysler LLC et al. Patricia Pascale v. Chrysler LLC et al.

Nos. 08A1096, 08-1513 (08A1099), 08A1100.

June 9, 2009.

*2276PER CURIAM.

The applications for stay presented to Justice GINSBURG and by her referred to the Court are denied. The temporary stay entered by Justice GINSBURG on June 8, 2009, is vacated.

A denial of a stay is not a decision on the merits of the underlying legal issues. In determining whether to grant a stay, we consider instead whether the applicant has demonstrated “(1) a reasonable probability that four Justices will consider the issue sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari or to note probable jurisdiction; (2) a fair prospect that a majority of the Court will conclude that the decision below was erroneous; and (3) a likelihood that irreparable harm will result from the denial of a stay.” *Conkright v. Frommert,*556 U.S. -, -, 129 S.Ct. 1861, 1862, 173 L.Ed.2d 865 (2009) (GINSBURG, J., in chambers) (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted). In addition, “in a close ease it may be appropriate to balance the equities,” to assess the relative harms to the parties, “as well as the interests of the public at large.” *Id.,*at -, 129 S.Ct., at 1862 (internal quotation marks omitted).

“A stay is not a matter of right, even if irreparable injury might otherwise result.” *Nken v. Holder,*556 U.S. -, -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1761, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). It is instead an exercise of judicial discretion, and the “party requesting a stay bears the burden of showing that the circumstances justify an exercise of that dis*2277cretion.” *Ibid.*The applicants have not carried that burden.

“[T]he propriety of [a stay] is dependent upon the circumstances of the particular case,” and the “traditional stay factors contemplate individualized judgments in each case.” *Ibid,*(internal quotation marks omitted). Our assessment of the stay factors here is based on the record and proceedings in this case alone.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-458]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3534]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Van Gogh Portraits: Face to Face''

AGENCY: United States Department of State.

ACTION: Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 16, 2000, Notice was published on page 7902 of the 
Federal Register (Volume 65, Number 32) by the Department of State 
pursuant to Public Notice 3228 relating to the exhibit ``Van Gogh 
Portraits: Face to Face.'' The referenced Notice is hereby amended to 
add a venue. After ``January 14, 2001 and before ``is in the national 
interest,'' insert the following additional language: ``and at the 
Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY from January 30, 2001, through May 
15, 2001.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301 4th 
Street, S.W., Room 700, Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.

    Dated: December 28, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-458 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```