alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         (9,194)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  408,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               398,995
<PP&E>                                       4,570,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,969,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,443,544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,873
<OTHER-SE>                                     525,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,969,470
<SALES>                                          9,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,480
<CGS>                                            8,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (79,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (79,227)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.005)
        

</TABLE>
Employer’s Annual Information Return of OMB No. 1545-0714

Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 4 of the separate instructions.

Type of establishment (check

only one box) Name of establishment

1 Evening meals only

Evening and other

meals

Number and street (see instructions) Employer identification number 2

Meals other than

evening meals

City or town, state, and ZIP code 3

4 Alcoholic beverages

Establishment number

(see instructions)

Employer’s name (same name as on Form 941)

Number and street (P.O. box, if applicable)

City, state, and ZIP code (if a foreign address, see instructions)

Does this establishment accept credit Check if: Amended Return

cards, debit cards, or other charges?

1 Total charged tips for calendar year 2004 1

2 Total charge receipts showing charged tips (see instructions) 2

3 Total amount of service charges of less than 10% paid as wages to employees 3

4a Total tips reported by indirectly tipped employees 4a

b Total tips reported by directly tipped employees 4b

c Total tips reported (add lines 4a and 4b) 4c

5 Gross receipts from food or beverage operations (not less than line 2—see instructions) 5

6

6 Multiply line 5 by 8% (.08) or the lower rate shown here  granted by the

IRS. (Attach a copy of the IRS determination letter to this return.) 

7 Allocation of tips. If line 6 is more than line 4c, enter the excess here 7

 This amount must be allocated as tips to tipped employees working in this establishment.

Check the box below that shows the method used for the allocation. (Show the portion, if

any, attributable to each employee in box 8 of the employee’s Form W-2.)

a Allocation based on hours-worked method (see instructions for restriction)

b Allocation based on gross receipts method

c Allocation based on good-faith agreement (Attach a copy of the agreement.)

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature  Title  Date 

Cat. No. 49989U Form 8027 (2004)

Note: If you marked the checkbox in line 7a, enter the average number of employee hours

worked per business day during the payroll period. (see instructions)

Apt. or suite no.

Note: If you have allocated tips using other than the calendar year (semimonthly, biweekly,

quarterly, etc. ), mark an “X” on line 6 and enter the amount of allocated tips from your

records on line 7.

8 Enter the total number of directly tipped employees at this establishment during 2004 

Note: Complete the Employer’s Optional Worksheet for Tipped Employees on page 4

of the instructions to determine potential unreported tips of your employees.

 See separate instructions.

Yes (lines 1 and 2 must be completed)

No Final Return

2004
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2349 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2349

 To amend the Small Business Act to support the expansion of business 
 executive education programs for owners and managers of disadvantaged 
                        small business concerns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 1993

  Mr. Torres (for himself, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Conyers, Mr. 
  Clyburn, Mr. de Lugo, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Filner, Mr. Frost, Mr. 
Jefferson, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Mfume, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. 
Swett, Mr. Washington, Mr. Wynn, Mrs. Meek, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Stokes, and 
 Mr. Romero-Barcelo) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Act to support the expansion of business 
 executive education programs for owners and managers of disadvantaged 
                        small business concerns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disadvantaged Small Business 
Educational Opportunity Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR EXPANSION OF BUSINESS EDUCATION 
              PROGRAMS.

    Section 7(j)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(j)(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(2)(A)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), and 
        (E) as clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v), respectively; 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) Financial assistance under this subsection shall be provided 
for projects to support the expansion of business executive education 
programs for owners and managers of small business concerns which are 
eligible to receive contracts pursuant to section 8(a) of this Act. 
Such programs shall be presented by institutions of graduate business 
education which have provided such programs for a minimum of 10 
consecutive years.''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I,Luca D’Agnese certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Enersis S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 30, 2015
BRUCE KEVIN GREEN, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2766

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed October 9, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Waddell A. Wallace , Judge

.

Bruce Kevin Green, Jr., pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appell ee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### MAG INSTRUMENT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COLEMAN COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Does 1-10, Defendants.

No. 2010-1279.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 10, 2011.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 2011.

*364Robert C. Weiss, Law Offices of Robert C. Weiss, of Manhattan Beach, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were, Theodore S. Maceiko, Jones Day, of Los Angeles, CA, and Jerrold B. Reilly, Mag Instrument, Inc., of Ontario, CA.

Jonathan Rotter, Kaye Scholer, LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were Richard G. Greco, Aton Arbisser and Daniel P. Dinapoli.

LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7873

THOMAS BUTLER, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General for South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-04-1884-8) Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 3, 2006 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Thomas Butler, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Butler’s petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Butler’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel. ZHL1-PPG-O-M1/Inflamation, Airways Reactivity and Asthma Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 7, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Ave., Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David T. George, MD, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NIH, NHLBI, DEA, Review Branch, Rockledge Building II, Room 7188, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MD 20892-7924, 301/435-0288.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 14, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4440  Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00014-CV

In re Element Enterprises, LLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). The

relator’s motion to stay the underlying proceedings is dismissed.

____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Filed: January 16, 2014
[No. 35164-1-II.

Division Two.

August 14, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Dennis James Duncan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 06-1-00674-5, Leila Mills, J., entered July 28, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per QuinnBrintnall, J., concurred in by Armstrong and Penoyar, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2361 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2361

    To amend title 28, United States Code, to permit amounts in the 
Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund to be used for payment of 
   certain State and local property taxes on forfeited real property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 1993

  Mrs. Meek introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 28, United States Code, to permit amounts in the 
Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund to be used for payment of 
   certain State and local property taxes on forfeited real property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CERTAIN STATE AND LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES ON 
              FORFEITED REAL PROPERTY.

    Paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of section 524 of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out the period at the end of subparagraph 
        (I) and inserting in lieu thereof ``; and''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(J) the payment of State and local property taxes 
                on forfeited real property for the period beginning on 
                the date of the offense giving rise to the forfeiture 
                and ending on the day before the date of the order of 
                forfeiture.''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to all claims pending 
at the time of or commenced subsequent to the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40446 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ADOLFO NAVA-CORONA, also known as Juan Peredes-Gonzalez, also known as Juan Paredes-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-789-1

-------------------- December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Adolfo Nava-Corona (“Nava”) appeals the 37-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the aggravated-felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.No. 02-40446 -2- Nava acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Nava's argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4
 
                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


          THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made as of the 12th day of
February, 1998 by and between OPINION RESEARCH CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") and JOHN F. SHORT (the "Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H

          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into an Employment
Agreement dated as of the 1st day of November, 1996 (the "Agreement"); and

          WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement by clarifying the
definition of Base Compensation set forth therein to include any increases to
such Base Compensation determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board
from time to time.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as
follows:

1.        The Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to
          the end of paragraph 3(a): "Such Base Compensation as increased from 
          time to time by the Compensation Committee of the Board shall be
          deemed to be the Executive's Base Compensation for purposes of this
          Agreement".

2.        Except as provided in the preceding paragraph, all other terms and
          conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this 
Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                        OPINION RESEARCH CORPORATION


                                        By:/s/Michael R. Cooper
                                           _________________________     

                                           /s/John F. Short
                                           _________________________ (SEAL)
                                           John F. Short