alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture.

# ACTION:

                        Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Iowa NRCS                               ( print page 1303)                            State Technical Guide for review and comment.                     

# SUMMARY:

It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for Iowa that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide specifically in Section 4, Practice Standards and Specifications #590, Nutrient Management, to account for improved technology. This practice can be used in systems that treat highly erodible land.

# DATES:

Comments will be received on or before February 7, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leroy Brown, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street, 693 Federal Building, Des Moines, Iowa 50309; at 515/284-4260; fax 515/284-4394.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.

Dated: December 26, 2000.

Dennis Pate,

Assistant State Conservationist-Technology.

[FR Doc. 01-400  Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
2009-1595.

#### State v. Brown.

Montgomery App. No. 22645, 2009-Ohio-1274.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18.U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Franklin Credit Management
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Alan Joseph, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Alan Joseph
---------------
Alan Joseph
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002

                                     Page 27
NDB Number*

Calories

Calories From Fat

Total FatSaturated FatCholesterolSodium

Total Carbohydrate

Protein

Vitamin A

Vitamin CCalcium

Iron

United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety and Inspection Service September 2011

Cooked (by moist or dry heat with 

no added ingredients), edible weight 

portion. Percent Daily Values (%DV) 

are based on a 2,000 calorie diet.

 Serving Size 3 ounces (84g)

Pork

Loin Chop, broiled 10038 180 80 9 

14 

3 

15 

70 

24 

45 

2 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 4%

Loin Country Style Ribs , roasted 10206 280 190 21 

33 

8 

39 

75 

26 

45 

2 

 0 

 0 20 0 0 0 4% 

Loin Top Loin Chop Boneless, broiled 10064 160 70 8 12 

2.5 

13 

60 

20 

35 

2 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 2% 

Loin Rib Chop, broiled Loin Rib Chop, broiled 10046 190 100 11 

17 

4 

19 

55 

19 

45 

2 

 0 

 0 21 0 0 0 4% 

Spareribs, braised 10089 330 230 25 39 

9 

47 

100 

34 

80 

3 

 0 

 0 24 0 0 0 8% 

Loin Tenderloin, roasted 10222 120 30 3.5 

5 

 1 

6 

60 

20 

45 

2 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 6% 

Shoulder Blade Steak, braised 10081 220 130 Shoulder Blade Steak, braised 15 

23 

6 

28 

80 

27 

50 

2 

 0 

 0 21 0 0 0 8% 

Loin Top Roast Boneless, roasted 10065 160 70 7 11 

2.5 

12 

65 

22 

40 

2 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 2% 

Loin Sirloin Roast, roasted 10055 190 100 11 

17 

3.5 

17 

75 

25 

50 

2 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 4% 

Lamb - 1/8” fat trim

Shank, roasted Shank, roasted 17233 180 90 10 

15 

4 

 19 

75 

25 

55 

2 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 10%

Shoulder Arm Chop, braised 17247 280 170 19 

29 

8 

39 

100 

34 

60 

3 

 0 

 0 26 0 0 0 10% 

Shoulder Blade Chop, braised 17251 280 180 20 

31 

8 

41 

95 

32 

65 

3 

 0 

 0 24 0 0 0 10% 

Rib Roast , roasted 17241 290 210 Rib Roast 23 

36 

10 

49 

80 

27 

60 

3 

 0 

 0 18 0 0 0 8% 

Loin Chop, broiled 17237 250 160 17 

27 

7 

36 

85 

28 

65 

3 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 8% 

Leg (whole), roasted 17231 200 110 12 

19 

5 

25 

75 

26 

55 

2 

 0 

 0 22 0 0 0 10% 

*USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, USDA, ARS.

Pork and lamb provide negligible amounts 

of dietary fiber and sugars.

Nutrition Facts

Pork ƭ Lamb
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-4809

CAROLYN STOVER ROBERTS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-98-10-AW)

Submitted: May 10, 2000

Decided: June 20, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Walter L. Blair, BLAIR & LEE, P.C., Hyattsville, Maryland; C. William Michaels, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Odessa P. Jackson, Assistant United

States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Stover Roberts appeals the district court's amended judgment modifying her restitution payment schedule. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

We find no merit in Roberts' argument that she was not liable to

pay the full amount of restitution as ordered by the district court and

contained in the judgment of conviction. Full restitution was within

the range permitted by her plea agreement. At sentencing, the court

informed her that she would be jointly and severally liable for the full

amount of restitution along with her now-deceased husband.

We also find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

modifying the judgment of conviction after Roberts received a substantial monetary settlement from Montgomery County because a

police officer shot her husband, causing his death. The receipt of the

settlement sufficiently changed her circumstances to warrant accelerating the restitution payment schedule. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k)

(1994).

In addition, we find that the seven-day time period under Rule

35(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is not applicable to

a Government's motion seeking modification of a restitution order

under § 3664(k).

Finally, we conclude that Roberts' due process rights were not violated when the district court declined to hold a hearing on the Government's motion to modify the restitution order. Roberts was served

with notice of the motion and had an opportunity to respond. In addition, the district court's modification of the judgment of conviction

did not violate Roberts' protection against double jeopardy. She was

always obligated to pay the full amount of restitution and the district

court's modification did not alter that obligation.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's amended judgment of

conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

 2
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

 AFFIRMED

 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE

REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO OPERATE A GOVERNMENT - OWNED OR LEASED VEHICLE

1. Employee Name: 2. E-mail: (firstname.last@usda.gov) 3. Home Address:

4. Valid State or Territory Driver's License Number: 5. Driver's License Issuing State or Territory: 6. Driver's License Expiration Date:

7. Restrictions shown on Driver's License:

 Corrective Lenses None Other (Please Specify)

8. Program Office and District/Region:

9. List all Accidents or Traffic Violations that Occurred while Driving a Personal or Government Vehicle in the Last 5 Years: 

 (By Date, Place, Charge, and Disposition)

10. List of Accidents in Last 5 Years: (By Date, Place, Circumstances and Dollar Damage to Vehicle, Driver, Other Vehicles, and Property)

11. List all Suspensions or Revocations of State Driver's License in the Last 5 Years: 

12. Driver Improvement Training Courses Completed in the Last 5 Years: 

13. I certify that all the information given by me 

 in this application is true, complete and 

 made in good faith.

Signature of Applicant: Date: (mm/dd/yyyy)

14. I have reviewed the employee's statements 

 as indicated and have verified that said 

 employee possesses a valid State/Territory 

 driver's license.

Signature of Supervisor: Date: (mm/dd/yyyy)

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION USE ONLY

15. Reviewed for Approval: Approved Disapproved

 Reason for Disapproval:

16. Signature Certifying Officer: Title: Date: (mm/dd/yyyy)

FSIS 2450-5 (05/10/2023) Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.0

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of W W Capital Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve
D. Zamzow, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, based
on my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


         Dated:  January 31, 2003         By: /s/ Steve D. Zamzow
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Steve D. Zamzow, President and CEO
SCHEDULE H 

(Form 965)

(Rev. December 2019)

Amounts Reported on Forms 1116 and 1118 

and Disallowed Foreign Taxes

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

▶ Attach to Form 965.

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form965 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-0123

Name of person filing this return Identifying number

SECTION 1—Amounts Reported on Forms 1116 and 1118 and Disallowed Foreign Taxes

a Separate Category (Enter code–see instructions.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

b If code 901j is entered on line a, enter the country code for the sanctioned country (see instructions) . . ▶

2019 Tax Year 

1 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 Section 965(a) inclusion in U.S. dollars with respect to pass-throughs from Schedule F, 

column (e)(1), line 17. Enter here and on Form 1116, Part I, or Form 1118, Sch. A (see 

instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶ 3

4 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

6 Section 965(c) deduction in U.S. dollars from pass-throughs allocable to section 965(a) 

inclusion (see instructions). Enter here and on Form 1116, Part I, or Form 1118, Sch. A . ▶ 6

7 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

8 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

9 Taxes deemed paid through pass-throughs. Enter amount from Schedule F, column (l), 

line 17. Also report on Form 1118, Schedule B, Part I, column 3 . . . . . . . . . . 9

10 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

11 Enter the 2019 Applicable Percentage from pass-throughs. If there are multiple pass-throughs, 

leave this line blank and attach a schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

12 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

13 Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

14 Disallowed foreign taxes through pass-throughs. Attach calculation. See instructions. 

Report amount here and on Form 1118, Schedule G, Part I, line F . . . . . . . . . 14

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions. Cat. No. 71323K Schedule H (Form 965) (Rev. 12-2019)
Exhibit 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 33-84592, 33-84594, 33-15493, 33-15499, 33-48539, 333-48541, 333-58773, 333-58777, 333-45414and 333-89070) of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. of our reports dated March 30, 2006 relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP   Los Angeles, California  March 30, 2006
# 2023-24

# 2022-23

# 2021-22

# 2020-21

# 2018-19

# 2017-18

# 2016-2017

# 2015-2016

# 2014-2015

# 2013-2014

# 2012-2013

# 2011-2012

# 2010-2011

# 2009-2010

# 2006_08 Rates
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                                    /s/ William J. Ryan
                                                    ---------------------
                                             Name:  William J. Ryan
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 5, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Banknorth Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Banknorth Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00053-CR

Robert GARCIA, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR13227

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED January 22, 2020.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the quarter ended September 29, 1997 Form 10Q Balance Sheets and
Statements of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000830159
<NAME>           American Tax Credit Properties, I L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>               1000
<CURRENCY>                0
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         MAR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                            MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              SEP-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1.00
<CASH>                                                            185
<SECURITIES>                                                    3,046
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      59
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 10,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             191
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   10,073
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   65
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                (266)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (686)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (16.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
                                                                    

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**Certification**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pressure BioSciences,
      Inc.,
      a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Richard T. Schumacher, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
      United States Code) that:





(1)
        The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: November
                14, 2008
            By:
            */s/**Richard
                T. Schumacher*Richard
                T. Schumacher
              President
                & Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pressure BioSciences, Inc. and will be retained by Pressure BioSciences, Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### Greg WALSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-2282.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2014.

Decided: April 14, 2014.

Gregory J. Walsh, Appellant Pro Se.

Aaron Drew Neal, McNamee Hosea, Jernigan, Kim, Greenan & Walker, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Greg Walsh appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the “FDCPA”). The record does not contain a transcript of the hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss. An appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). An appellant proceeding on appeal in for-ma pauperis is entitled to transcripts at government expense only in certain circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2006). Even if we were to grant Walsh’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we conclude that he has not made the requisite showing to qualify for preparation of the transcript at the government’s expense. By failing to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at government expense, Walsh has waived review of the issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show error. *See Powell v. Estelle,*959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.1992); *Keller v. Prince George’s County,*827 F.2d 952, 954 n. 1 (4th Cir.1987). As no error appears on the record before us, we affirm *219the district court’s order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*