alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. R. WATKINS CO. v. HOLCOMBE et al.

No. 24898.

Feb. 12, 1935.

George E. Merritt, foy plaintiff in error.

J. H. Long, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced in the district court of Stephens county by the filing of a petition against A. F. Holcombe, as principal, and J. M. Holloway, J. W. Monds, and Fannie G. Monds, as sureties, on a contract made to the plaintiff. The trial resulted in a judgment for the defendants, and on the 31st day of July, 1933, the plaintiff in error filed its case-made and petition in error in this court, and on the 16th day of October, 1933, filed its brief. The authorities therein reasonably support the theory of the plaintiff in error that the court committed error in rendering judgment for the defendants. The defendants in error have failed to file a brief or to offer any excuse for such failure. In O’Brien v. Cummings, 167 Okla. 7, 27 P. (2d) 821, this court said:

> “Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions.”

See, also, Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Moore, 167 Okla. 469, 30 P. (2d) 671; Gibbins v. Horr, 167 Okla. 469, 30 P. (2d) 673.

The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate its order and judgment entered for the defendants, and to enter judgment upon the pleadings for the plaintiff in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 1373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-444]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 28, 2000.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 7, 
2001 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0016.
    Form Number: IRS Form 706-A.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: United States Additional Estate Tax Return.
    Description: Form 706-A is used by individuals to compute and pay 
the additional estate taxes due under Code section 2032A(c). IRS uses 
the information to determine that the taxes have been properly 
computed. The form is also used for the basis election of section 
1016(c)(1).
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 180.

           Estimated Burden Hours per Respondent/Recordkeeper
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping..........................  3 hr., 17 min.
Learning about the law or the form.....  2 hr., 11 min.
Preparing the form.....................  1 hr., 40 min.
Copying, assembling, and sending the     1 hr., 3 min.
 form to the IRS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 1,474 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-444 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
농장서비스기관(FSA) 도시카운티

위원회는 새로이 구성되었습니

까? 

2020년 USDA는 전적으로 도시 농업

에 초점을 맞춘 최초의 FSA 카운티 위

원회를 지지하기 시작했습니다. 이 새

위원회들은 도시 농업을 더 잘 지원하

기 위한 USDA의 노력의 일환이며, 각 

위원회는 3~11명의 위원으로 구성

될 것입니다. 카운티 위원회는 1930

년대부터 FSA 프로그램에 대한 농업

인들의 의견을 전달하는 수단으로 사

용되었습니다. 카운티 위원회는 농업

인을 대표하고 지역 수준에서 우선 순

위를 설정합니다. 

도시 카운티 위원회는 어떤 일을

합니까? 

도시 카운티 위원회는 도시, 실내 및

기타 신흥 농업을 장려하고 촉진하기

위해 노력합니다. 또한, 도시 카운티

위원회는 식량 및 영양 접근성, 지역

사회 참여, 지역사회 퇴비화를 촉진하

고 장려하기 위한 지역 활동 지원, 음

식물 쓰레기 감소와 같은 영역을 다룰

수 있습니다. 그들은 또한 FSA와 천연

자원보전국(NRCS) 

모두를 위해 결정을 내리고, 민원을

청취하고, 결정을 내리고, 혁신적인 

도시 생산자들에게 출장봉사 활동

을 수행합니다. 

이게 왜 중요합니까? 

지금까지 지역 도시 재배자들이

USDA 우선 순위 및 자금 조달에 영

향을 미칠 수 있는 절차가 없었습니

다. 혁신적인 도시 생산자들은 재배

자와 지역 사회의 요구를 파악하고

USDA가 그들을 가장 잘 도울 수 있

는 방법에 대한 방향을 제시할 수 있

는 고유한 자격을 갖추고 있습니다. 

카운티 위원회에서 봉사함으로써 귀

하는 USDA 프로그램에 대한 지역

결정에 편입되며 USDA가 도시 농장

에서 제공하는 서비스에 긍정적인

영향을 미칠 수 있습니다. 

임기는 얼마이며 회의

일정은 어떻게 됩니까? 

위원회 위원들은 적어도 분기별로

만나며 임기는 3년입니다. 회원은 최

대 3회 또는 9년 동안 재선에 출마할

수 있습니다. 

도시 카운티 위원회는 어디에

있습니까? 

도시 카운티 위원회가 있는 위치

목록은 fsa.usda.gov/elections에서

찾을 수 있습니다. 

가장 가까운 카운티 위원회에서 봉사

하는 데 관심이 있는 시범 지역 외부의 

도시 생산자는 지역 FSA 카운티

사무소에 문의할 수 있습니다. 

farmer.gov/service-locator에서

서비스 센터 로케이 터 도구를

사용하여 지역 사무소를 찾으십시오. 

지명은 어떻게 이루어집니까?

USDA 프로그램에 참여하거나 도시

카운티 위원회를 위해 식별된 지역에서

농사 운영에 대한 USDA 정보를

제공함으로써 협력하는 도시 농업인은

지명을 받거나 자신 또는 다른 사람을

지명할 수 있습니다. 단체는 후보자를

추천할 수 있습니다. 

도시 농업 카운티 위원회

자주 묻는 질문 2023년 8월

~더~
고려되려면 생산자는 FSA-669A 

지명 양식에 서명해야 합니다. 

FSA 카운티 위원회 선거에 

대한 양식 및 기타 정보는

fsa.usda.gov/elections 또는

farmers.gov/urban에서 입수할

수 있습니다.

마감일은 언제인가요? 

6월 중순 – FSA는 도시/교외

카운티 위원회에 대한 지명을

받기 시작합니다. 

8월 초 – 지명 양식은 소인이 찍혀

있거나 현지 FSA 사무소에서

수령되어야 합니다. 

11월 초 – 자격을 갖춘 유권자에게

선거 투표용지가 우편으로

발송됩니다. 

12월 초 – 투표 용지를 서비스

센터로 제출하는 마지막 날. 

1월 1일 – 새 위원들이 취임합니다. 

도시 카운티 위원회를 설립하는

새로운 위치에는 지역에 공개될

특별 선거 일정이 있을 수

있습니다. 초기 설립 후 새

위원회는 위에서 설명한 대로 연간

선거 주기를 따를 것입니다. 

도시 농업인을 위한 USDA 

프로그램은 다음과 같습니다. 

FSA – 무보험 농작물 재해 지원 프로그램, 

유기농 인증 비용 분담 프로그램 , 소액

융자, 농장 저장 시설 융자. 

NRCS – 높은 터널, 토양 건강 및 관개를 포

함한 보존 재정 및 기술 지원. 

도시 카운티 위원회에서

고문으로 봉사하려면 어떻게

해야 합니까? 

FSA 카운티 위원회에는 선출 또는 임명된

위원 외에도 의결권이 없는 소수 고문도

포함될 수 있습니다. 소외된(소수자 또는

여성) 생산자가 공정하게 대표되도록 보

장하기 위해 카운티 위원회로 임명됩니

다. 카운티 위원회 고문으로 활동하는 데

관심이 있는 사람은 누구든지 지역 FSA 카

운티 사무소에 서면으로 신청서를 제출할

수 있습니다. 

USDA는 기회균등 제공자, 고용주 및 대출 기관입니다.

fsa.usda.gov 

자세한 내용은 아래 참조

farmers.gov/urban 및 fsa.usda.gov/elections.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
February 26, 2001.
    A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, March 1, 2001, at 2:30 
p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(A) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
the closed meeting.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:

institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and
institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: February 22, 2001.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4747 Filed 2-22-01; 12:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Amended Return

Form 8082 OMB No. 1545-0790 (Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR)) (Rev. December 1995)

(For use by partners, S corporation shareholders, REMIC

residual interest holders, and TMPs) Attachment

Department of the Treasury Sequence No. 84 Internal Revenue Service © See separate instructions.

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

General Information

1 Notice of (check boxes that apply): (a) Inconsistent treatment (b) Amended return (administrative adjustment request (AAR))

2 If you are a TMP filing an AAR on behalf of the pass-through entity, are you requesting substituted return

treatment? (see instructions)

3 Check applicable box to identify type of pass-through entity: (a) Partnership (b) S corporation (c) REMIC

4 Identifying number of pass-through entity 6 Tax shelter registration number (if applicable) of pass-through entity

5 Name, address, and ZIP code of pass-through entity 7 Internal Revenue Service Center where pass-through entity filed its return

8 Tax year of pass-through entity / / to / /

9 Your tax year / / to / /

Inconsistent or Amended (Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR)) Items

(b) Inconsistency is in,

or amendment (AAR)

is to (check boxes that

apply)

(c) Amount as shown on

Schedule K-1, Schedule

Q, or similar statement, or

your return, whichever

applies (see instructions)

(a) Description of inconsistent or amended

(administrative adjustment request (AAR)) items

(see instructions)

(e) Difference between

(c) and (d) (d) Amount you are reporting

Amount of

item

Treatment

of item

10

11

12

13

Explanations—Enter the Part II item number before each explanation. If more space is needed, continue

your explanations on the back.

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 8082 (Rev. 12-95)

Part III

Part I

Part II

Cat. No. 49975G

Yes No
Form 8082 (Rev. 12-95) Page 2

Part III Explanations (continued)

Printed on recycled paper
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**906 CERTIFICATION**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Ignacio Antoñanzas A., the Chief Executive Officer and Alfredo Ergas S., the Chief Financial Officer of ENERSIS S.A., each certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.               the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.               the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Enersis.

 

 

Date: May 31, 2011.

 

 
|   | /s/ Ignacio Antoñanzas A.   |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Name: Ignacio Antoñanzas A. |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer        |
|   |                             |
|   |                             |
|   | /s/   Alfredo Ergas S.           |
|   | Name:   Alfredo Ergas S.         |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer        |

 

----
#### MICHAEL MOURNING *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*Wayne A. Francis,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

Decided July 1, 2010

The petitioner Michael Mourning’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 612 (AC 30744), is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                        478,551
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 000
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        000
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,622,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         309,915
<BONDS>                       000
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,622,599
<SALES>                       000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              479,046
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              97,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               382,013
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           382,013
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  382,013
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .18
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

I, Joseph H. Black, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

6.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of County Bank Corp;

7.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

8.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

9.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (e) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (f) [THIS PARAGRAPH INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]

      (g) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (h) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

10.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
      on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2004

By: /s/ Joseph H. Black
    ------------------------------------
Joseph H. Black
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Antonio COLBERT, Appellant v. LEGAL AID, Appellee.

No. 10-7160.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2011.

Antonio Colbert, Washington, DC, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order entered October 26, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The district courts of the United States are “courts of limited jurisdiction ... possessing] only that power authorized by Constitution and statute.” *Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America,*511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994). The district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions presenting a “federal question” under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The district courts also have jurisdiction in “diversity” cases, when the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 *and*the lawsuit is between citizens of different U.S. states or between U.S. citizens and foreign citizens or foreign states. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In this case, the appellant failed to establish the district court had either federal question jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *354
      *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Medicure Inc. - Exhibit 4(u)







	M E D I C U R E   I N T E R N A T I O N A L   I
      N C . 


July 4, 2006

MEDICURE INTERNATIONAL INC., 
a corporation
incorporated under the laws of Barbados, 
(hereinafter referred to as
"Medicure"),

- and -

CanAm Bioresearch Inc. 
a corporation incorporated
under the laws of Canada, 
(hereinafter referred to as "Research Co").

Re: Amendment to the Development Agreement (the
“Agreement”)

This letter, once executed, will constitute an amendment to the
Agreement dated June 1, 2000. The wording of Section 3.1 (b) of the Agreement,
dated June 1, 2000 and subsequently amended on August 7, 2003 and July 8, 2005
is hereby replaced with the following:

“The aggregate of all Expenditure Limits under all Research
Schedules entered into pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed thirty
million dollars ($30,000,000) (the “Aggregate Expenditures”).”

In addition the Expenditure Limit as defined in Schedule B of
the Agreement is increased to $30,000,000 and the Required Completion Date is
extended from 5 years to 10 years from the Commencement Date. 

All other terms, covenants and conditions remain in force in
accordance with the original agreement as dated January 1, 2000 and subsequent
amendment on August 7, 2003 and July 8, 2005.

Upon execution of the agreement, please return one original to
  our office and retain the other for your files.


  	MEDICURE INTERNATIONAL INC. 	 	 CANAM BIORESEARCH INC. 
	  	  	 	  	  
	Per: 	/s/ Trevor Hassell 	 	Per: 	/s/ Marcus Enns 
	  	Name: Trevor Hassell 	 	  	Name: Marcus Enns 
	  	Position: Director 	 	  	Position: President 
	  	 	 	  	  
	MEDICURE INTERNATIONAL INC. 	 	  	  
	  	 	 	  	  
	Per: 	/s/ Kirk Cyrus 	 	  	  
	  	Name: Kirk Cyrus 	 	  	  
	  	Position: Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James E. Declusin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78c(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James E. Declusin
---------------------------------
James E. Declusin
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the following applicant has filed with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515). 

Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. 

*Ocean Freight Forwarder—Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicant:*                     Bianca R. Lopez, 227 W. Grand Avenue, El Segundo, CA 90245, Sole Proprietor.                 

Dated: February 16, 2001. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-4421 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P