alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 101 2013 Options



		

			EXHIBIT 10.1

		


		

			 

		




		
			MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.
		

		
			2005 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT TO
		

		
			NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (the "Company"), having an address at 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747, and FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME (the "Grantee"), having an address at ADDRESS_LINE_1 , CITY, STATE ZIPCODE ,  hereby amend that certain Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement by and between the Company and the Grantee dated October 23, 2013 (the “Option Agreement”).
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend the expiration date of the Option Agreement.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that the Option Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			1.The first sentence of Section 4, entitled “Term and Exercisability of the Option Period.” shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			The Option shall expire on October 22, 2022, and, except as otherwise provided herein, may be exercised prior to its expiration at such times and for such number of whole Shares as follows:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			2.All terms and conditions of the Option Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect and shall constitute the legal, valid, binding and enforceable obligations of Participant and the Company.  As of the date hereof, each party herein restates, ratifies and reaffirms each and every term and condition set forth in the Option Agreement, as amended herein.  There are no other changes to the Option Agreement except for the changes specifically set forth herein.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			[Signature Page Follows]
		

		

		

		 


		

			1

		




 


		

			 

		




		
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the date set forth below:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			By: _______________________________________
		

		
			       
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Date: ________________________ , 2020
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Grantee
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			_______________________________________
		

		
			(FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME)
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Date: ________________________ , 2020
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		 


		

			2
1

The Honorable Robert N. Armen, Jr., United States Tax Court Judge.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2546

___________

Larry Delano Coleman, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * Tax Court.

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: July 14, 2011

Filed: July 19, 2011

___________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Larry Coleman appeals the tax court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment in

his action challenging a Notice of Determination issued by the Internal Revenue

Service (IRS) Office of Appeals. 

After carefully reviewing the record de novo, see Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v.

Comm’r, 594 F.3d 968, 969 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 86 (2010), we conclude

that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated by the tax court, and

we find no merit to Coleman’s arguments on appeal. We also decline to consider
-2-

Coleman’s request for relief based on changed circumstances. See 26 U.S.C.

§ 6330(d)(2) (IRS Office of Appeals shall retain jurisdiction with respect to

determination, including subsequent hearings, on issues regarding change in

circumstances which affects such determination).

Accordingly, we affirm the tax court’s decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00439-CR

Cheryl STEVENSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR7803

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 26, 2012

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellant Cheryl Stevenson waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to harassment of a 

public servant. The trial court imposed sentence on November 15, 2011, but suspended 

confinement and placed appellant on community supervision. Thereafter, the State alleged that 

appellant violated the terms of her plea and moved to revoke appellant’s community supervision. 

Just before the hearing on the motion to revoke, appellant’s counsel filed a Motion Suggesting 

Incompetency and Request for Examination. The court granted the motion suggesting 
04-12-00439-CR

- 2 -

incompetency; it did not consider the motion to revoke. Appellant filed a notice of appeal 

complaining of the order granting an examination. 

An appellant may appeal “a pretrial hearing on competency when such matter is raised in 

an appeal from the trial on its merits,” but not before. See Jackson v. State, 548 S.W.2d 685, 690 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Petty v. State, 05-04-00705-CR, 2004 WL 1302951, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Dallas June 14, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 

On August 15, 2012, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing not later than August 

30, 2012, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On September 10, 

2012, appellant’s counsel filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to our August 15, 

2012 order, and a response stating counsel’s opinion that this court does not have jurisdiction to 

hear appellant’s appeal. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the response is granted.

We conclude that this court is without jurisdiction to consider appellant’s complaint. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.12 § 23(b); Jackson, 548 S.W.2d at 690. Therefore, we 

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000830319
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program III, Series 6, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         26102
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38125
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               66937
<PP&E>                                         2757539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2511347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          48395
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     264734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313129
<SALES>                                        100766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100766
<CGS>                                          48738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  61234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   30583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Thomas Grant II, certify that: 

1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc.; 

2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors; 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: May 7, 2004
By  /s/ *W. Thomas Grant II*
W. Thomas Grant II, Chairman of the Board,
Food Safety Steps 

for Successful Community Meals

USDA | Food Safety and Inspection Service February 2010

Whether preparing food for a family reunion or a community gathering, people 

who are great cooks at home don’t necessarily know how to safely prepare and 

store large quantities of food for large groups. Food that is mishandled can 

cause foodborne illness. However, by following some simple steps, volunteer 

cooks can make the event safe and successful!

1 Plan Ahead — Make sure the location meets your needs.

 • Be sure you have enough oven, stovetop, refrigerator, freezer, and work space.

 • Find out if there’s a source of clean water. If not, bring water for preparation 

 and cleaning.

2 Store & Prepare Food Safely

 • Refrigerate or freeze perishable food within 2 hours of shopping or preparing; 

 1 hour when the temperature is above 90 °F.

 • Find separate preparation areas in the work space for raw and cooked food.

 • Never place cooked food back on the same plate or cutting board that held 

 raw food. 

 • Wash cutting boards, dishes, utensils, and work surfaces frequently with hot, 

 soapy water.

 • Wash hands with soap and warm water for at least 20 seconds before and 

 after handling food and after using the bathroom, changing diapers, or 

 handling pets.

3 Cook Food to Safe Minimum Internal Temperatures —  It’s the only way to tell if harmful bacteria are destroyed!

 • Use a food thermometer to check the internal temperature of meat, poultry, 

 casseroles, and other food. Check temperature in several places to be sure 

 food is cooked to a safe minimum internal temperature. 

 • Never partially cook food for fi nishing later because you increase the risk of 

 bacterial growth.

4 Transport Food Safely – Keep hot food HOT. Keep cold food COLD.

 • Keep hot food at or above 140 °F. Wrap well and place in an insulated 

 container.

 • Keep cold food at or below 40 °F. Place in a cooler with a cold source such 

 as ice or frozen gel packs.

5 Need to Reheat? Food must be hot and steamy for serving. 

 Just “warmed up” is not good enough.

 • Use the stove, oven, or microwave to reheat food to 165 °F. Bring sauces, 

 soups, and gravies to a boil.

6 Keep Food Out of the “Danger Zone” (40–140 °F).

 • Keep hot food hot — at or above 140 °F. Place cooked food in chafi ng dishes, 

 preheated steam tables, warming trays, and/or slow cookers.

 • Keep cold food cold — at or below 40 °F. Place food in containers on ice. 

7 When In Doubt, Throw it Out!

 • Discard food left out at room temperature for more than 2 hours; 1 hour 

 when the temperature is above 90 °F.

 • Place leftovers in shallow containers. Refrigerate or freeze immediately.

7 For more food safety

information, “Ask Karen”

at AskKaren.gov 

or call the toll-free USDA 

Meat and Poultry Hotline 

at 1-888-MPHotline 

(1-888-674-6854); 

TTY: 1-800-256-7072; 

www.fsis.usda.gov 

. 

Be Food Safe! 

Prepare with Care 

 CLEAN. 

Wash hands, utensils, 

and surfaces often.

 SEPARATE. 

Don’t cross-contaminate.

 COOK. 

Use a food thermometer.

 CHILL. 

Chill food promptly.

BeFoodSafe.gov
1

The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, United States District Judge for the District

of North Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-1828

___________

Aaron M. Deroo, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of North Dakota.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 29, 2007

Filed: February 1, 2007

___________

Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Deroo appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2241. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R.

47A(a).

______________________________
2009-1676.

#### State v. Vinson.

Franklin App. No. 09AP-163, 2009-Ohio-3751.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

August 12, 2003

/s/ CHARLES SHEFFIELD
---------------------------
Charles Sheffield
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ E.A. BUCHHOLTZ
---------------------------
E.A. Buchholtz
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 12535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4649-N-09]


Announcement of OMB Approval Number for 24 CFR Part 570--
Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Announcement of OMB approval number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the OMB approval 
number for the collection of information pertaining to 24 CFR part 
570--Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sue Miller, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410, 
telephone (202) 708-1577. This is not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
chapter 35, as amended), this notice advises that OMB has responded to 
the Department's request for approval of the information collection 
pertaining to 24 CFR Part 570--Community Development Block Grant 
Entitlement Program. The OMB approval number for this information 
collection is 2506-0077, which expires on January 31, 2004.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.

    Dated: February 15, 2001.
Donna M. Abbenante,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4790 Filed 2-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 11227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4623]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 36 / Thursday, February 22, 2001 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 11227]]

                Executive Order 13203 of February 17, 2001

                
Revocation of Executive Order and Presidential

                Memorandum Concerning Labor-Management Partnerships

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, it is hereby ordered that:

                Section 1. Executive Order 12871 of October 1, 1993, as 
                amended by Executive Orders 12983 and 13156, which 
                established the National Partnership Council and 
                requires Federal agencies to form labor-management 
                partnerships for management purposes, is revoked. Among 
                other things, therefore, the National Partnership 
                Council is immediately dissolved.

                Sec. 2. The Presidential Memorandum of October 28, 
                1999, entitled ``Reaffirmation of Executive Order 
                12871--Labor-Management Partnerships'' (the 
                ``Memorandum''), which reaffirms and expands upon the 
                requirements of Executive Order 12871 of October 1, 
                1993, is also revoked.

                Sec. 3. The Director of the Office of Personnel 
                Management and heads of executive agencies shall 
                promptly move to rescind any orders, rules, 
                regulations, guidelines, or policies implementing or 
                enforcing Executive Order 12871 of October 1, 1993, or 
                the Memorandum, to the extent consistent with law.

                Sec. 4. Nothing in this order shall abrogate any 
                collective bargaining agreements in effect on the date 
                of this order.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 17, 2001.

[FR Doc. 01-4623
Filed 02-21-01; 11:16 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,845
<INVENTORY>                                     28,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,617
<PP&E>                                         425,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 688,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,862
<BONDS>                                        582,811
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                       (807)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   688,722
<SALES>                                        139,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,979
<CGS>                                          127,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,419)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,381)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,381)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.27)


</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 13, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D 2 1

- 0 170 Lower Tribunal No s

. 1 9

- 22 4 3 3 CC & 20

- 1 64 AP

________________ Union Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Ella and Lloyd Fields , Appellant,

vs. Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company , Appellee.
An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Natalie Moore , Judge. Law Office of Asher Perlin, and Asher Perlin (Hollywood) , for appellant

. Link & Rockenbach, PA, and Kara Rockenbach Link and Daniel M. Schwarz (West Palm Beach) , for appellee.

Before SCAL ES , MI L L E R and BOKOR , JJ. PER CURIAM

.2 Union Restoration, Inc. (“Union”) a/a/o Ella and Ll oy d Fields (“the insureds”) , the plaintiff below, appeals a July 29, 2020 final order dismissing its amended complaint for lack of standing. Union is a contractor that perfor med repair services at the insureds’ home after the home incurred water damage. Union’s amended complaint allege d a breach of contract action against Heritage Property and Casualty Insurance Company , the defendant below, based on the insurer’s alleged fail ure to pay policy benefits to Union. Finding no error in the trial court’s determination that the assignment attached to the amended complaint is invalid because it was not signed by one of the insureds and the mortgagee, as required by the underlying prop erty insurance policy, we affirm. See Restoration 1 of Port St. Lucie v. Ark Royal Ins. Co. , 255 So. 3d 344, 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (holding that a provision of a property insurance policy requiring the consent of all insureds and the mortgagee before the insureds’ rights may be assigned is enforceable) ; but see Sec. First Ins. Co. v. Fla

. Office of Ins. Regulation , 232 So. 3d 1157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)

. Affirmed.