alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2465

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing temporary duty

suspension on certain knitting machines and parts, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1993

Mr. MANTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing

temporary duty suspension on certain knitting machines

and parts, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DUTY SUSPENSIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Each of the following headings

5 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

6 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘12/31/95’’:

8 (1) Heading 9902.84.48 (relating to circular

9 knitting machines and parts).
2

•HR 2465 IH

1 (2) Heading 9902.84.49 (relating to power driv2 en flat knitting machines and parts).

3 (b) HOSIERY KNITTING MACHINES AND NEEDLES.—

4 (1) Heading 9902.84.47 of the Harmonized

5 Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to ho6 siery knitting machines and parts) is amended—

7 (A) by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘12/31/94’’; and

9 (B) by striking ‘‘or 8448.59.10’’ and in10 serting ‘‘8448.51.50, or 8448.59.10’’.

11 (2) Heading 9902.84.51 of such Schedule (re12 lating to needles for knitting machines) is amended

13 by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.

14 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

16 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

17 enactment of this Act.

18 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec19 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

20 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro21 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

22 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

23 warehouse for consumption of goods to which any amend24 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

25 (1) after December 31, 1992; and
3

•HR 2465 IH

1 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en2 actment of this Act;

3 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

4 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

5 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

6 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

7 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08

- 18

- 00201

- CR

§

ERIC DEE MILDON,

Relator. §

§ AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDI NG

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Yahara Gutierrez, Judge of the 65th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the

petition for writ of mandamus, in ac cordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Schedule 10.5 (b)
                                                                to the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement
                                                                      between Statoil ASA and Statpet AS
                                                                                     and Norsk Teekay AS
                                                                                  dated 15 December 2002

To: Statoil ASA and Statpet AS

Statement of None Awareness

We refer to the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement (the Agreement) entered into on 15 December 2002
between Statoil ASA and Statpet AS on the one side and Norsk Teekay AS on the other side.

Words and expressions defined or used in the Agreement have the same meanings in this Schedule, unless
the contrary is expressly stated or where those meanings would be clearly inconsistent in the relevant
context.

We hereby represent and warrant that we are not aware of any facts or circumstances that could give
raise to a claim against the Sellers under or in connection with the representations or warranties or
otherwise under this Agreement.

[as at Closing] 2003
for and on behalf of

__________________
Norsk Teekay AS

_________________________
[name of authorised signatory]
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John W. McCarty, certify that: 

1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LabOne, Inc.; 

2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a.) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b.) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c.) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors; 

a.) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 9, 2004

By  /s/ *John W. McCarty*
John W. McCarty, Executive V.P. and Chief
EXHIBIT 32

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Christopher L. Kolb, President and principal financial officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Christopher L. Kolb                                       
| | Christopher L. Kolb,
President and principal financial officer

November 13, 2009
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000721 30-MAR-2017 08:07 AM
To find out how to keep foods safe, call the USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline 1-800-535-4555; TTY: 1-800-256-7072.E-mail: mphotline.fsis@usda.govwww.fsis.usda.govFor a copy of “Cooking for Groups: A Volunteer’s Guide to Food Safety,” write:FCICItem #604HPueblo, CO 81009A public service of this publication and the Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA

So You Volunteered to Cook for a Community Meal or Office Party?

Make sure you keep your food safe.

d to Cook for a 

r Office Party?

2.

To find out how to keep foods safe, call the USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline 1-800-535-4555; TTY: 1-800-256-7072.For a copy of “Cooking for Groups:A Volunteer’s Guide to Food Safety,”write: FCIC, Item #604H, Pueblo, CO 81009.A public service of this publication and the Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA

Volunteered to 

Cook for a Community Meal or Office Party?

To keep foods safe, call the 

USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline 

1-800-535-4555

TTY: 1-800-256-7072

A public service of this publication and the 

Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA

Volunteered to Cook for a Community Meal or Office Party?
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2555

To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth Street in

Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1993

Mr. PORTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 100 East Fifth

Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United

States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 100 East Fifth

5 Street in Cincinnati, Ohio, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be
2

•HR 2555 IH

1 a reference to the ‘‘Potter Stewart United States

2 Courthouse’’.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131724 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131724 

 COA: 269868 

Montcalm CC: 05-006188-FC 

BENJAMIN DAVID WOLFGANG, 05-006180-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2006 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer August 12, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal BodyCare, Inc. and will be retained by Royal BodyCare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Form 8910

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Alternative Motor Vehicle Credit

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Information about Form 8910 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8910.

OMB No. 1545-1998

2016

Attachment 

Sequence No. 152

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

Note:

• Use this form to claim the credit for certain alternative motor vehicles.

• Claim the credit for certain plug-in electric vehicles on Form 8936.

Part I Tentative Credit

Use a separate column for each vehicle. If you need more columns, 

use additional Forms 8910 and include the totals on lines 7 and 11. (a) Vehicle 1 (b) Vehicle 2 

1 Year, make, and model of vehicle . . . . . . . 1

2 Vehicle identification number (see instructions) . . 2

3 Enter date vehicle was placed in service (MM/DD/YYYY) 3 / / / /

4 Tentative credit (see instructions for amount to enter) 4

Next: If you did NOT use your vehicle for business or investment purposes and did not have a credit from a partnership or 

S corporation, skip Part II and go to Part III. All others, go to Part II.

Part II Credit for Business/Investment Use Part of Vehicle 

5 Business/investment use percentage (see instructions) 5 % %

6 Multiply line 4 by line 5 . . . . . . . . . . 6

7 Add columns (a) and (b) on line 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

8 Alternative motor vehicle credit from partnerships and S corporations (see instructions) 8

9 Business/investment use part of credit. Add lines 7 and 8. Partnerships and S 

corporations, stop here and report this amount on Schedule K. All others, report this 

amount on Form 3800, Part III, line 1r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Part III Credit for Personal Use Part of Vehicle 

10 If you skipped Part II, enter the amount from line 4. If 

you completed Part II, subtract line 6 from line 4 . . 10

11 Add columns (a) and (b) on line 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

12 Enter the amount from Form 1040, line 47, or Form 1040NR, line 45 . . . . . . 12

13 Personal credits from Form 1040 or 1040NR (see instructions) . . . . . . . . 13

14 Subtract line 13 from line 12. If zero or less, enter -0- and stop here. You cannot claim

the personal use part of the credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

15 Personal use part of credit. Enter the smaller of line 11 or line 14 here and on Form

1040, line 54 (or Form 1040NR, line 51). Check box c on that line and enter “8910” in

the space next to that box. If line 14 is smaller than line 11, see instructions . . . . 15

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 37720F Form 8910 (2016)
STATE OF TEXAS vs. Thomas Hughley 

### § § § § § FANNIN COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Thomas Hughley, the Defendant 

### in the above-styled and numbered cause and gives his Notice ofAppeal to the Sixth Court of Appeals ofTexas from the judgment(s) rendered

# ·~;~ @efelld8I1t Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice was hand delivered to the Fannin County District Attorney 's Office, Texas , on , 20 .

# l~**liu~mNDANT**

1-Notice of Appeal - Hughley, Thoma s
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2611 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2611

   To delay the effective date of certain proposed amendments to the 
                   Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 1993

Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To delay the effective date of certain proposed amendments to the 
                   Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``The Delayed Effective Date of Certain 
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. DELAY THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF 
              CIVIL PROCEDURE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which were adopted by the Supreme 
Court of the United States and submitted to the Congress on April 22, 
1993, shall have no force or effect until July 1, 1996.

                                 <all>
```
**
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
**

Washington, D.C. 20549

**
FORM 10-Q
**

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For quarterly period ended June 30, 2001
Commission file number: 0-16946
**Lab*One*, Inc.

10101 Renner Blvd.

Lenexa, Kansas 66219

(913) 888-1770

Incorporated in Missouri

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number: 43-1039532

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

	Yes /X/    No /  /
Number of shares outstanding of only class of Registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, as of July 31, 2001 - 10,778,310 net of 2,271,710 shares held as treasury stock.

**Lab*One*, Inc.

 

Form 10-Q for the Second Quarter, 2001

Table of Contents

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   Financial Statements:
   Consolidated Balance Sheets
   Consolidated Statements of Earnings
   Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Financial Statements
ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
   Selected Financial Data 
   Second Quarter Analysis 
   Year to Date Analysis 
   Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources 
ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 
PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION
**SIGNATURES******
#### Pedro LARA-SANDOVAL, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-71620.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Decided Jan. 6, 2011.

Pius Joseph, Law Offices of Pius Joseph, A Professional Law Corporation, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.

David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Jesse Matthew Bless, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Lara-Sandoval, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his applications for adjustment of status and cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Rice v. Holder,*597 F.3d 952, 954-55 (9th Cir.2010), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Lara-Sandoval does not contest the agency’s determination that his conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11550(a) constitutes a violation of a law “relating to a controlled substance.” *See*8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a) (2)(A) (i)(II), 1227(a)(2)(B)(i). He therefore is ineligible for adjustment of status, *see id.*§ 1255(a)(2), and cancellation of removal, *see id.*§ 1229b(b)(l)(C).

Lara-Sandoval’s conviction is final for purposes of immigration review, *see Morales-Alvarado v. INS,*655 F.2d 172, 175 *42(9th Cir.1981) (a conviction subject to collateral attack is final for immigration purposes), and we may not reexamine the conviction here, *see Urbina-Mauricio v. INS,*989 F.2d 1085, 1089 (9th Cir.1993) (a conviction cannot be collaterally attacked in an immigration proceeding). Because his conviction has not been expunged pursuant to a state rehabilitative statute, he would not qualify for benefits under the Federal First Offender Act. *See Chavez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 1284, 1290-92 (9th Cir.2004).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Lara-Sandoval’s voluntary departure claim because he did not exhaust this claim before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,016
<INVENTORY>                                     13,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,326
<PP&E>                                          82,843
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,967
<SALES>                                        190,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,939
<CGS>                                          117,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  162,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
        


</TABLE>