alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Medicure Inc. - Exhibit 4(s)






AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

          THIS
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) made as of the 1st day of
October, 2005.

BETWEEN:

Albert Friesen,
(hereinafter called the
“Consultant”),

OF THE FIRST PART,

A.D. Friesen Enterprises Ltd.,
 (hereinafter called
“Enterprises”),

OF THE SECOND PART.

- and -

Medicure Inc.,
(hereinafter called the
“Corporation”),

OF THE THIRD PART.

          WHEREAS
the Consultant, Enterprises and the Corporation have entered into a Consulting
Services Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) made as of the 1st
day of October, 2001 and subsequently amended on the 1st day of
October 2003;

          NOW
THEREFORE THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH that for the sum of $1.00 and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Consultant, Enterprises and the
Corporation covenant and agree with each other as follows:

1.        All parties
to the Consulting Agreement namely the Consultant, Enterprises and the
Corporation agree to amend section 4 of the Consulting Agreement such that,
effective October 1, 2005, the Corporation shall pay to Enterprises a fee of
$16,666.66 per month plus applicable goods and services tax for services
provided by the Consultant. The Consultant shall also be eligible to receive a





performance bonus of up to 30 percent of his annual salary.
This agreement is subject to a one-year term ending on September 30, 2006.

2.         Other
than as amended herein all other terms and conditions of the Consulting
Agreement continue in full force and effect.

3.          This
Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and shall be binding on the parties
hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

4.          This
Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of Manitoba.

5.          The
preamble hereto forms an integral part of this Agreement.

6.          This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and all such
counterparts shall for all purposes constitute one instrument binding on the
parties hereto even though all the parties are not signatories to the same
counterpart.

              
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the
Consultant, Enterprises and the Corporation as of the day and the year first
above written.

Albert Friesen

Per: /s/ Albert Friesen

A.D. Friesen Enterprises
Ltd.

Per: /s/ Albert Friesen

Medicure Inc.

Per: /s/ Derek Reimer

2
Exhibit 32


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, Mark Meriwether, CEO, President, Secretary/Treasurer
and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Dated: 5/14/04                           /s/Mark Meriwether
                                         -------------------------
                                         President
                                         CEO
                                         Treasurer
                                         Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FOURTH  QUARTER  10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           21,558
<SECURITIES>                                         20
<RECEIVABLES>                                   125,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7,003
<INVENTORY>                                     168,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                329,467
<PP&E>                                          211,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                   58,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  699,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           133,344
<BONDS>                                         219,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            249
<OTHER-SE>                                      332,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    699,299
<SALES>                                         529,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                529,789
<CGS>                                           291,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   291,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                200,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  20,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                      8,394
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12,521
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12,521
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.49



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This article contains summary financial information extracted from the
three month period ended September 29, 2000 Form 10-Q Balance Sheet and
Statement of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000830159
<NAME>                                  American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                          147
<SECURITIES>                                  2,111
<RECEIVABLES>                                    49
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,307
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           278
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    4,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,297
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                100
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (826)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (826)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
FSIS 2400-6 (05/17/2023) Page 1 of 2

Earplugs

 Overall, how satisfied were you with this product? 

 How likely are you to recommend this product to be incorporated in the Agency's inventory? 

What work activities were performed while wearing the PPE? 

How long did you wear this product? 

A full shift

Between 4 and 8 hours

Between 2 and 4 hours

< 2 hours

 Very unsatisfied Very satisfied

 Very unlikely Very likely

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Name:

FSIS Establishment Number:

Which of the assigned products are you providing feedback on? Check the applicable PPE used for this trial (one 

form per piece of PPE):

Gloves

Establishment:

Please make your selection(s) below:

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE 

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Evaluation Checklist 

Safety Glasses

Miscellaneous PPE:
 Page 2 of 2

What was the biggest challenge using this PPE?

Comment(s): Please share with us in your own words your impression of the effectiveness of this PPE:

How easy was it to don or doff the PPE?

 How confident are you that this product provides you the kind of protection you needed? 

 FSIS 2400-6 (05/17/2023)

 Not very confident Extremely confident

Very difficult Very easy

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE 

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Evaluation Checklist 

Didn't protect hands against contaminants

Hands lack dexterity when wearing gloves

Increased temperature of hands

Other (Explain below in comments)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          32,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,087
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,947
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    626
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                626
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    17.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Jeffrey Dale GREGORY, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATOR, et al.

No. 08-10254.

June 8, 2009.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### CAROLINA WATERWORKS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAYLOR MADE GROUP, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and Taylor Made Products, Defendant.

No. 2014-1362.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 6, 2014.

James R. Barney, Attorney, Stephen L. Hennessy, Finnegan, Henderson, Fara-bow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, Bernard S. Klosowski, Jr., Esq., Thrive Ip, Greenville, SC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert Allen Rowan, Attorney, Michael Edward Crawford, Attorney, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., Arlington, VA, for Defendant-Appellee.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Carolina Waterworks, Inc. moves without opposition to withdraw its appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

*896(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         110,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    51
<PP&E>                                         800,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 928,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,479
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     913,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   928,470
<SALES>                                        110,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,756
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,069
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,069
<EPS-BASIC>                                       8.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.32


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Executive Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael F. AnthonyMichael F. AnthonyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Director


Dated: September 9, 2004
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7143** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GREGORY E. GRANTHAM , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00103

- JFM

- 3; 1:15

- cv - 03229

- JFM )

Submitted : March 14, 2017 Decided: March 16, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gregory E. Grantham, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Kathleen O’Connell Gavin, Jefferson McClure Gray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Un published opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory E. Grantham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge i ssues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- E l v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grantham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with or al argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

December 17, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00785

- CR

Billy Jack GUERRA

, Appel lant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CR4609 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

A trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal has been filed in this appeal. The trial court judge has certified that the underlying criminal case “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Therefore, we ORDER the trial court clerk to file an electronic clerk’s record within TEN DAYS from the date of this order containing the following documents:

1. all pre

- trial orders and the related pre

- trial motions;

2. the C ourt’s Admonishments, the defendant’s Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony, and any other stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant = s plea bargain;

3. the Judgment;

4. all post

- judgment motions and orders;

5. the Notice of Appeal;

6. the T rial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. the Criminal Docket Sheet.We DIRECT the clerk of this court to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6114
ERIC ERWIN COLLIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-381-5-BR) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Erwin Collier, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. To the extent that Appellant seeks re view of the district court's prior order dismissing his complaint, such appeal is untimely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider it. See Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978). We therefore dismiss this portion of the appeal. Collier v. Freeman , No. CA-95-381-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Timothy S. Davidson, certify that:





1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Natural Health Trends Corp.; and





2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 29, 2019/s/ Timothy S. DavidsonTimothy S. DavidsonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### FOUNDATION OF HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 10-648.

March 21, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned officer of Chase Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies thatthe Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31,2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thatthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.This certificate is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 
| Date:   July 12, 2010       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/  Peter R. Chase                   |   |
|                                  |   |
| Peter  R. Chase                       |   |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal  executive officer)        |   |

 

----