alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2258

To apply the expanded definition of disposable retired pay used for computation of the maximum amount of a former spouse’s share of military

retired pay to divorces that became final before the effective date of

amendments made by Public Law 101–510 as well as those after that

date.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1993

Mrs. SCHROEDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To apply the expanded definition of disposable retired pay

used for computation of the maximum amount of a

former spouse’s share of military retired pay to divorces

that became final before the effective date of amendments made by Public Law 101–510 as well as those

after that date.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2258 IH

1 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY TO PREVIOUS DIVORCES OF

2 CHANGE IN RULES FOR COMPUTING MAXI3 MUM FORMER SPOUSE SHARE OF MILITARY

4 RETIRED PAY.

5 (a) CHANGE IN APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (2) of

6 section 555(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act

7 for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat.

8 1570) is amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(2) The amendments made by subsections (b), (c),

10 and (d) apply to divorces, dissolutions of marriage, annul11 ments, and legal separations that become effective at any

12 time, whether before, on, or after the date of the enact13 ment of this Act.’’.

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE OF CHANGES.—Any change in

15 payments of military retired or retainer pay by reason of

16 subsection (a) may apply only to payments of military re17 tired or retainer pay payable for months beginning after

18 the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the

19 enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 21.1
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE TALBOTS, INC.
 Name of subsidiary
    
    Organized under the laws ofTalbots Classics, Inc.
    
    MassachusettsThe Talbots Group, Limited Partnership
    
    MassachusettsJ. Jill, GP
    
    MassachusettsJ. Jill, LLC
    
    New HampshireTalbots Import, LLC
    
    DelawareBirch Pond Realty Corporation
    
    DelawareTalbots International Retailing Limited, Inc.
    
    DelawareTalbots Classics Finance Company, Inc.
    
    DelawareTalbots Classics National Bank
    
    Rhode IslandTalbots (U.K.) Retailing Limited
    
    DelawareTalbots Charitable Foundation, Inc.
    
    DelawareTalbots (Canada), Inc.
    
    DelawareTalbots (Canada) Corporation
    
    Nova Scotia, Canada
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2383 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2383

To extend until January 1, 1997, the previously existing suspension of 
                         duty on anthraquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1993

Mr. Payne of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend until January 1, 1997, the previously existing suspension of 
                         duty on anthraquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLY EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 
              ANTHRAQUINONE.

    Heading 9902.30.17 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/96''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 
on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been no duty or a lower duty 
if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or 
withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
withdrawal had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of RBC Life Sciences, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Steven E. Brown, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Steven E. Brown

Steven E. Brown

Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2007  29
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary L. Pittman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 13, 2003            /s/ Gary L. Pittman
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Gary L. Pittman
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4567]



[[Page 11568]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Advisors to the Superintendent, Naval 
Postgraduate School

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this meeting is to elicit the advice of the 
board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education Program. The board 
examines the effectiveness with which the Naval Postgraduate School is 
accomplishing its mission. To this end, the board will inquire into the 
curricula, instruction, physical equipment, administration, state of 
morale of the student body, faculty, and staff; fiscal affairs; and any 
other matters relating to the operation of the Naval Postgraduate 
School, as the board considers pertinent. This meeting will be open to 
the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, March 5, 2001, from 9:00 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, from 9:00 a.m. to 
12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the National Defense University, 
Fort McNair, Hill Conference Room, Roosevelt Hall, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate 
School, 1 University Circle, Monterey, California 93943-5000, telephone 
number (831) 656-2514.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corp, U.S. Navy, Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4567 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
#### Richard P. BRASKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Celeste FENDER; Nathan Tobey, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-35723.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 7, 2014.*

Filed March 28, 2014.

Kevin Keaney, Kevin Keaney PC, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Harry Auerbach, Chief Deputy City, Robert Takashi Yamachika, Office of the City Attorney, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Frederic Block, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Richard P. Braskett (“Braskett”) appeals a grant of summary judgment on his claims, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure were violated. Braskett claims that four violations occurred over the course of two separate occasions when the defendants visited his home.

Braskett first claims that the defendants violated his rights when they moved a gun from his bedroom to a locked box in the garage. The record establishes that they did so at his wife’s request. His second claim is that the defendants searched his medicine cabinet. However, because the record demonstrates that Braskett’s wife retrieved pill bottles from the cabinet and voluntarily showed them to the defendants, there was no search. The same undisputed fact resolves Braskett’s third claim— that the defendants unlawfully copied down information from the pill bottles— because the information was in plain view. *See Kentucky v. King,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1849, 1855, 179 L.Ed.2d 865 (2011). Finally, Braskett claims that the defen*569dants seized a different pill bottle from a garage trash can, but his wife led them to the trash can, where the bottle was contained in a transparent plastic bag.

Braskett argues that his wife lacked the capacity to consent. Considering the totality of the circumstances, *see Schneckloth v. Bustamonte,*412 U.S. 218, 234 n. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), we conclude that the material undisputed facts demonstrate that Braskett’s wife had the capacity to understand the nature of her statements and actions during the defendants’ visits.

Braskett further argues that the defendants used a ruse to obtain entry into his home by misrepresenting their intentions to his wife. Because the defendants’ conduct inside the house did not violate the Fourth Amendment, the means by which they secured Braskett’s wife’s consent to enter did not violate the Fourth Amendment, either. *See United States v. Garcia,*997 F.2d 1273, 1280 (9th Cir.1993).

Braskett’s remaining arguments are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF EVERGREEN ENERGY INC.

KFx
Technology, LLC*a Delaware limited liability company

Evergreen
Operations, LLC*a Delaware limited liability company.

Landrica
Development Companya South Dakota company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

Buckeye
Industrial Mining Co.an Ohio company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

KFx
Plant, LLCa Wyoming limited liability company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

KFx
Operations, LLCa Wyoming limited liability company 100% owned by Evergreen Operations, LLC

Evergreen
Energy International, LLC*a Delaware limited liability company.

Evergreen
Energy Asia Pacific Corpa Delaware company 96% owned by Evergreen Energy International, LLC

Evergreen
Energy Asia Corporationa Japanese company 100% owned by Evergreen Energy Inc.

C-Lock
Technology, Inc.a Delaware company 92% owned by Evergreen Energy Inc.

---

---



QuickLinks
# RTCP-Calculator Worksheet

# Sheet2

# Sheet1

# Sheet3

# Sheet4

# Sheet6

# Sheet5
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Executive Officer of Brookstone, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael F. AnthonyMichael F. AnthonyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Director




Dated: June 9, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1998 SECOND
QUARTER 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,496
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              35
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,010
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,854
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,046
<LOANS>                                         68,849
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,120
<DEPOSITS>                                      72,182
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,413
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,975
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  96,120
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,768
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  516
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,284
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,235
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,475
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,809
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (16)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (18)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    877
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         877
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.64
<LOANS-NON>                                        131
<LOANS-PAST>                                        89
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,035
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       11
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,025
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               108
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            917
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RBC Life Sciences, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Steven E. BrownSteven E. BrownVice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
[No. 59119-3-I.

Division One.

October 1, 2007.]

#### Timothy D. Crawford et al., *Appellants,*v. Matthew Woodward et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-2-36103-8, Helen Halpert, J., entered October 13, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1761 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1761

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend special 
   treatment rules under the medicare program for regional referral 
 centers and to permit a hospital that fails to qualify as a regional 
referral center under the program as a result of a change in geographic 
  classification to decline such change and qualify as such a center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1993

    Mr. Roberts (for himself, Mr. Slattery, Mr. Lancaster, and Mr. 
  Bereuter) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend special 
   treatment rules under the medicare program for regional referral 
 centers and to permit a hospital that fails to qualify as a regional 
referral center under the program as a result of a change in geographic 
  classification to decline such change and qualify as such a center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL TREATMENT RULES UNDER MEDICARE FOR 
              REGIONAL REFERRAL CENTERS.

    (a) Extension Through Fiscal Year 1994.--Section 6003(d) of the 
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww note) is 
amended by striking ``October 1, 1992'' and inserting ``October 1, 
1994''.
    (b) Permitting Hospitals to Decline Reclassification.--If any 
hospital fails to qualify as a rural referral center under section 
1886(d)(5)(C) of the Social Security Act as a result of a decision by 
the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board under section 
1886(d)(10) of such Act to reclassify the hospital as being located in 
an urban area for fiscal year 1994, the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services shall--
            (1) notify such hospital of such failure to qualify,
            (2) provide an opportunity for such hospital to decline 
        such reclassification, and
            (3) if the hospital declines such reclassification, 
        administer the Social Security Act (other than section 
        1886(d)(8)(D)) for fiscal year 1994 as if the decision by the 
        Review Board had not occurred.

                                 <all>
```