alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136623 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136623 COA: 280802 Wayne CC: 03-007511-01 T.J. SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
#### IN RE SAMANTHA S.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18628.

The petition by the respondent father for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 755 (AC 30197), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the record in the present case was not adequate for review?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*914
      *David B. Rozwaski,*in support of the petition.

*Tammy Nguyen-ODowd,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided June 15, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                           1,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (300)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,447
<PP&E>                                          63,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                (30,727)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,639
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,405
<SALES>                                         44,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,848
<CGS>                                           30,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (298)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (458)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (458)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2608 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2608

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                     September 22 (legislative day, September 7), 1993.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2608) entitled ``An Act to make permanent the authority of the 
Secretary of Commerce to conduct the quarterly financial report 
program'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF COLLECTION AND PUBLICATION OF QUARTERLY 
              FINANCIAL STATISTICS BY THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ``An Act to amend 
title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for the 
quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade Commission to the 
Secretary of Commerce, and for other purposes'', approved January 12, 
1983 (Public Law 97-454; 96 Stat. 2494; 13 U.S.C. 91 note) is amended 
by striking out ``September 30, 1993'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``September 30, 1998''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made under subsection (a) shall 
take effect on September 30, 1993.
            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to provide for the 
      reauthorization of the collection and publication of quarterly financial 
      statistics by the Secretary of Commerce through fiscal year 1998, and for 
      other purposes.''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2280

To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing suspensions of

duty on certain chemicals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1993

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing

suspensions of duty on certain chemicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSIONS OF DUTY ON CERTAIN CHEMI4 CALS.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

7 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’ in each of the fol8 lowing headings:

9 (1) Heading 9902.29.86 (relating to lasamid).
2

•HR 2280 IH

1 (2) Heading 9902.30.20 (relating to chlorhexa2 none).

3 (3) Heading 9902.31.01 (relating to

4 theobromine).

5 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by section

7 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

8 enactment of this Act.

9 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec10 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

11 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro12 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

13 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

14 warehouse for consumption of goods to which any amend15 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

16 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

17 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en18 actment of this Act;

19 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

20 or a lower duty if such amendment had applied to such

21 entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as

22 though such entry or withdrawal had occurred on such

23 15th day.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Curtis JOHNSON, a/k/a Curt, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-7884.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 24, 2014.

Decided: April 28, 2014.

*264James Curtis Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Curtis Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 8582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Johnson,*No. 5:01-cr-00090-H-l (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2128

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to

for fiscal years 1993 and 1994.authorize appropriations for refugee assistance
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2128

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize

appropriations for refugee assistance for fiscal years

1993 and 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

4 REFUGEE ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEARS

5 1993 AND 1994.

6 Section 414(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1524(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year

8 1992’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 1993 and fiscal year

9 1994’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 25, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Properties L.P.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax Credit Properties Inc.,
general partner of Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general partner of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
-----------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman Tax
Credit Properties Inc., general partner of
Richman Tax Credit Properties L.P., general
partner of the Registrant
November 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,389,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              159,752,062
<ALLOWANCES>                              (21,430,720)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,990,044
<PP&E>                                         950,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             143,614,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,424,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,167
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               143,614,617
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,156,188
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,102,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,811,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                217,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   217,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.100
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
AND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENTS
 Amendment Amendment Effective Date Franklin
Asset Holding Lender Forbearance Agreement Amendment Loan Party Amendment Loan
Parties
 Static Loan Borrowers FCMC Franklin Master
Agreement Static Loans
  Identified Forbearance Defaults




---



##### 



Extension of Forbearance for the Static Loans
 Forbearance
Date
 Conditions of Effectiveness
   Representations and Warranties
 Ratification and Reaffirmation.




---



##### 



Reference to and Effect on the Loan Documents
 Waiver and Release of All Claims and Defenses; Communications
 Claims




---



##### 



Communications
  No Waiver
 Waiver of Right to Trial by Jury
 Counterparts
 Costs and Expenses




---



##### 



Further Assurances
 Governing Law
 Headings
 Patriot Act Notice Act
 [Signature page follows.]




---



##### 



AMENDMENT LOAN PARTIES:FRANKLIN CREDIT ASSET CORPORATIONBy: /s/ Alexander Gordon JardinName: Alexander Gordon JardinTitle: Chief Executive OfficerAddress for Notices:101 Hudson St., 25th FloorJersey City, New Jersey 07302Fax: (201) 604-4400Attention: General CounselFRANKLIN CREDIT HOLDING CORPORATIONBy: /s/ Alexander Gordon JardinName: Alexander Gordon JardinTitle: Chief Executive OfficerAddress for Notices:Same as aboveFLOW 2006 F CORP.By: /s/ Alexander Gordon JardinName: Alexander Gordon JardinTitle: Chief Executive OfficerAddress for Notices:Same as above
 Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Credit Agreements




---



##### 



FCMC 2006 M CORP.By: /s/ Alexander Gordon JardinName: Alexander Gordon JardinTitle: Chief Executive OfficerAddress for Notices:Same as aboveFCMC 2006 K CORP.By: /s/ Alexander Gordon JardinName: Alexander Gordon JardinTitle: Chief Executive OfficerAddress for Notices:Same as above
 Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Credit Agreements




---



##### 



LENDER:THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANKBy: /s/ Alan D. SeitzName: Alan D. SeitzTitle: Senior Vice PresidentAddress for Notices:41 South High StreetHCO730Columbus, Ohio 43229Attn: Commercial LendingTelephone No.: (614) 480-5355Telecopier No.: (614) 480-3795With a copy to:Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP41 South High StreetColumbus, Ohio 43215Attn: Timothy E. Grady, Esq.Telecopier No.: (614) 227-2105Telephone No.: (614) 227-2100
 Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement and Amendment to Credit Agreements
# FY19_Q3

# Percent Positives - User Notes
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-30098 Summary Calendar

DAVID JACOBSON, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPAR TMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AN D C O RR E C T I O N S ; L O U I S IA NA D E PAR T M E N T O F P U B L I C S A F E T Y AN D C O R R E C T I O N S , M u n i c i p a l E n t i t y ; H O WA R D P R I N C E ; R O B E R T HENDERSON; LATERDA DRUMMON, Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:10-CV-251

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Jacobson, Louisiana prisoner # 558909, moves this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The district court denied his request to proceed IFP on appeal certifying that the appeal was n o t taken in good faith. Jacobson’s IFP motion in this c o u r t is a challenge to the district court’s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 11, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-30098 Document: 00511569202 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2011No. 11-30098

certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1992). T h e dismissal of an IFP complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C

. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) is reviewed for an abuse o f d i s c r e t ion. Geiger v. Jowers , 404 F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 2005). Because Jacobson has not shown t h a t he will present any nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied and this a ppeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; H o w a r d v . King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of Jacobson’s § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim and our dismissal of this appeal as frivolous both count as strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 1 0 3 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Jacobson is cautioned that if he accumulates th r ee strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while h e i s i n c a rcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See§ 1915(g). IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

2 Case: 11-30098 Document: 00511569202 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.                          ( print page 11301)    

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel. PA-99-087—Mentored Quantitative Research Career Development Award (K25).                    

*Date:*                         February 15, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         6701 Rockledge Dr., Rm. 4116, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Diane M. Reid, MD, Review Branch, Room 7182, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Disease Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS). 

Dated: February 13, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4462  Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1873 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1873

 To require certain payments made to victims of Nazi persecution to be 
 disregarded in determining eligibility for and the amount of benefits 
                       or services based on need.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1993

 Mr. Waxman (for himself, Mr. Berman, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
   Schumer, and Mr. Gilman) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require certain payments made to victims of Nazi persecution to be 
 disregarded in determining eligibility for and the amount of benefits 
                       or services based on need.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PAYMENTS MADE TO VICTIMS OF NAZI PERSECUTION 
              DISREGARDED IN DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR AND THE AMOUNT 
              OF NEED-BASED BENEFITS AND SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Payments made to individuals because of their 
status as victims of Nazi persecution shall be disregarded in 
determining eligibility for and the amount of benefits or services to 
be provided under any Federal or federally assisted program which 
provides benefits or services based, in whole or in part, on need.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply to determinations 
made on or after the date of the enactment of this Act with respect to 
payments referred to in subsection (a) made before, on, or after such 
date.
    (c) Prohibition Against Recovery of Value of Excessive Benefits or 
Services Provided Due to Failure to Take Account of Certain Payments 
Made to Victims of Nazi Persecution.--No officer, agency, or 
instrumentality of any government may attempt to recover the value of 
excessive benefits or services provided before the date of the 
enactment of this Act under any program referred to in subsection (a) 
by reason of any failure to take account of payments referred to in 
subsection (a).

                                 <all>
```