alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury
 DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 7, 2001 to be assured of consideration. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) *OMB Number:*
                     1545-0016. *Form Number:*
                     IRS Form 706-A. *Type of Review:*
                     Extension. *Title:*
                     United States Additional Estate Tax Return. *Description:*
                     Form 706-A is used by individuals to compute and pay the additional estate taxes due under Code section 2032A(c). IRS uses the information to determine that the taxes have been properly computed. The form is also used for the basis election of section 1016(c)(1). *Respondents:*
                     Individuals or households. *Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers:*
                     180. Estimated Burden Hours per Respondent/Recordkeeper
Recordkeeping
3 hr., 17 min.Learning about the law or the form
2 hr., 11 min.Preparing the form
1 hr., 40 min.Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS
1 hr., 3 min.
 *Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden:*
                     1,474 hours. *Clearance Officer:*
                     Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224. *OMB Reviewer*: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Lois K. Holland, Departmental Reports Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 01-444 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of INCOME GROWTH PARTNERS, LTD. X (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy C. Maurer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Timothy C. Maurer

Timothy C. Maurer
Chief Financial Officer
November 6, 2002
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3345

___________ Marvel Jones, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Internal Revenue Service; Rodney J. * Strickland, Chief, Customer Service * Branch III; Dennis Parizek, Chief, * Customer Service Center Examination * Branch; Mr. Corbridge, Unknown * Position at Internal Revenue Service; * Richard M. Creamer, Commissioner; * Known and Unknown Defendants, * * Appellees, * * Appeal from the United States ---------------------------------- * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Marvel Jones, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant, * * v. * * Nebraska Department of Correctional * Services; Harold W. Clarke, Director; * Michael Kenney, Warden; George * Green, Facility CEO; Inga L. *1 The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2- Hookstra; Known and Unknown * Defendants, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 28, 2003 Filed: April 1, 2003

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nebraska inmate Marvel Jones appeals the District Court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) dismissal of, and its subsequent adverse grant of summary judgment in, his related 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuits. Having carefully reviewed therecord de novo, we affirm for the reasons explained in the District Court’s wellreasoned and thorough orders. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,553,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,553,249
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,553,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,503,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,553,249
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,525
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-34-000]


Southern California Edison Company, Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company; Notice of Filing

February 20, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 2, 2001, Southern California Edison 
Company (SCE) and Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) tendered for 
filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a 
Request for Immediate Suspension of Underscheduling Penalty.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before March 2, 2001. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically 
via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 384.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4576 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6646

ALVIN LEE GREGORY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL V. COLEMAN, Acting Warden, Mount Olive

Correctional Complex,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (5:02-cv-00472)

Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Lee Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Heather A. Connolly, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia; Charles Patrick

Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

Compare, e.g., White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th

Cir. 2004) (“adopt[ing] majority view that 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is the

exclusive vehicle for a habeas petition by a state prisoner in

custody pursuant to a state court judgment, even when the

petitioner is not challenging his underlying state court

conviction”), with Hamm v. Saffle, 300 F.3d 1213, 1216 (10th Cir.

2002) (approving of inmates proceeding under § 2241 to challenge

execution of state court sentence).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Lee Gregory seeks to appeal the district court’s

order construing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and dismissing it as

untimely, and the court’s orders denying reconsideration. The

orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that, although the

district court’s procedural ruling is debatable,* Gregory has not

demonstrated that the court’s assessment of the constitutional
- 3 -

claim is debatable or wrong. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000911583
<NAME> STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,765
<INVENTORY>                                    102,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,954
<PP&E>                                         122,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,959
<BONDS>                                        132,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,641
<SALES>                                        304,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,636
<CGS>                                          203,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,345
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.87


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4388]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Industry Sector Advisory Committee on 
Services for Trade Policy Matters (ISAC-13)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Services will hold a 
meeting on February 27, 2001, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon. The meeting will 
be opened to the public from 9 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. and closed to the 
pubic from 9:45 a.m. to 12 noon.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Department of Commerce, 
Conference Room 6057, located at 14th Street between Pennsylvania and 
Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Holderman (202) 482-0345, 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230 (principal contact), or myself on (202) 395-6120.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the opened portion of the meeting the 
following topics will be discussed:

<bullet> Services Contribution to the United States Economy
<bullet> Services Statistics

Christina Sevilla,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for 
Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 01-4388 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-P
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies
International, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen H. Durland, Chief Financial Officer (or
the equivalent thereof) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




                             /s/ Stephen Durland
                             -------------------------------
                             Stephen H. Durland
                             Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof)
                             November 13, 2002
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:November 14, 2008By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director
#### Ray A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. McKither BODISON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7519.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 9, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2010.

Ray A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ray A. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recom*707mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2860, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June 15, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on October 6, 2010.* Because Williams failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         224,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               244,093
<PP&E>                                      28,778,672
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,012,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,914,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          303,876
<BONDS>                                     19,674,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     630,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,914,635
<SALES>                                      1,965,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,045,019
<CGS>                                          944,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  944,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               446,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             735,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (82,043)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,043)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.05)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy S. Davidson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Natural Health Trends Corp.; and2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport.        Date: April 29, 2008 /s/ Timothy S. Davidson   Timothy S. Davidson   Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 4.1


 


SHARE CERTIFICATE

OF

CN ENERGY GROUP. INC.

中北能源集团有限公司

(the “Company”)

 

INCORPORATED IN THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS

Authorised to issue an unlimited number of no par value Shares divided into

(a)  Ordinary Shares of no par value; and

(b)  Convertible
Preferred Shares of no par value.

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE UNDER
MENTIONED PERSON IS THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF THE SHARES SPECIFIED HEREUNDER SUBJECT TO THE RULES AND LAWS GOVERNING
THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMPANY

 

	
Name & Address of Shareholder

	
Share Class

	
Certificate Number

	
No. of Shares

	
Date of Issue


	
[Name]

 [Address]

	
Ordinary

	
***[Certificate Number]***

	
-[Number]-

	
[Date]




 

GIVEN UNDER THE COMMON SEAL OF THE
COMPANY ON THE DATE STATED ABOVE AND IN THE PRESENCE OF

 

	
 

	
DIRECTOR/OFFICER/AUTHORISED PERSON




 

NO TRANSFER OF ANY OF THE ABOVE SHARES CAN BE REGISTERED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS CERTIFICATE