alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15

                            [TRANSLATION FROM HEBREW]

                   EXTENTION OF PERSONAL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
        Made and signed in Mazkeret Batia on the 31 day of December, 1996

     Between:       SCOPE METAL TRADING & TECHNICAL SERVICES LTD., 520037425
                    Industrial Park, Mazkeret Batia 76804
                    (hereinafter: "THE COMPANY") OF THE FIRST PART

     And between:   URI LADO
                    I.D. No 5159050
                    1 Keren Haysod, Mazkeret Batia
                    (hereinafter: "THE EMPLOYEE") OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS: the Parties signed on 1.1.92 an Employment Agreement for a term of five
         years; and

WHEREAS: the Parties' wish to extend the Employee's Employment term for
         additional five years; and

WHEREAS: the Employee holds the position of director and business manager in the
         Company;

IT HAS THEREFORE BEEN AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS:-

1.   PREAMBLE

     The preamble to this Agreement constitutes an integral part thereof.

2.   STIPULATED CONDITION

     The effectiveness of this Extension Employment Agreement is subject to the
     receiving of all the certificates of approval and taking all the necessary
     proceedings required by any law, and it shall enter into effect and oblige
     the Parties subject to and after the completion of such proceedings.

3.   VALIDITY EXTENSION AND COMPLETION

     The Personal Employment Agreement which signed with the Employee on 1.1.92
     is hereby extended for additional five years, that is: until 31.12.2001.
     Afterward the effect of this Agreement shall be renewed automatically
     (without further notices) for additional terms of five (5) years each until
     the Employee shall reach to retirement age.

     Despite the above said, each one of the Parties shall be entitled to
     terminate the employment of the Employee and to bring this Agreement to its
     end, subject to providing a prior written notice, which will be given at
     least three (3) years in advance.



     Such Termination Notice shall not require any cause thereto, or any other
     justification/reason/explanation.

4.   SALARY

     From 1.1.97, the Employee' monthly Salary is fixed to the sum of 30,300-
     NIS (thirty thousand and three hundred NIS) per month pre- tax, and it
     shall be modified on an ongoing basis as per Section 6 b+c of the
     Employment Agreement.

5.   SUBORDINATION AND MODIFICATIONS

     All the conditions of the Employment Agreement dated 1.1.92 shall be apply
     to the Extension Term and shall be in effect until the end of this
     Employment Agreement Extension, subject to all the necessary modifications
     required due the Extension and due to the content of this Employment
     Agreement Extension.

               IN WITNESS HEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE SET THEIR HANDS:


[SIGNATURE OF THE COMPANY]              [SIGNATURE OF THE EMPLOYEE]
        The Company                             The Employee
# Statements of Comprehensive Inc

# Balance Sheet

# Statements of Equity (Deficit)
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

September 5, 2019

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, September 19, 2019

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from  F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Thomasv. CalPortland Co.,*Docket No. WEST 2018-402-DM. (Issues include whether theJudge erred in concluding that the operator discriminated against the minerbecause of his safety complaints.)

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

PHONE NUMBER

FOR LISTENING TO 

MEETING:                             1-(866)867-4769

                                                Passcode:678-100

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3 669

_____________________________
D ARWIN E VANS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. March 29, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FF I RMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Darwin Evans , pro se , Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### TWIN STATE OIL CO. v. LONG et al.

No. 22532.

Jan. 8, 1935.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1935.

C. A. Toler and Geo. H. Bowen, for plaintiff in error.

Walter Mathews, for defendants in error.

CÜLLISON, Y. C. J.

This is a suit to recover damages for injury to plaintiff’s orchard. Plaintiff owned a tract of land on which was located an orchard of peach and apple trees. A ravine ran through the orchard and the trees in question were local od on the slopes leading down to the ravine. Plaintiff introduced testimony showing that the defendant drilled an oil and gas well some distance south of plaintiff’s orchard; that the well produced some gas and salt water for a few days, causing the salt water to be sprayed into the air and carried by the air down on plaintiff’s orchard, killing the trees on both hill slopes *414along said ravine. The evidence further indicated that native trees and vegetables between the orchard and well were not killed except close to the well.

Plaintiff obtained judgment, and defendant appealed and contends that there is no competent evidence in the record supporting the judgment for plaintiff on the measure of damages as instructed by the court.

The court followed the case of Sinclair Oil *&*Gas Co. et al. v. Allen, 143 Okla. 290, 288 P. 981, in instructing upon the measure of damages. The question was: What was the value of the land upon which the orchard grew just prior to the date of the alleged injury to said trees and the value of the land after the injury to said trees? This necessitated the introduction of evidence by plaintiff showing the value of the land with the orchard thereon immediately prior to the alleged injury and the value after said injury.

There is no sufficient competent testimony in the record showing the value of the land with the orchard thereon just prior to the alleged injury and shortly thereafter. The only testimony in the record from which the jury could have reached their verdict was testimony as to the value at the time of the trial. (R. 66.) Such evidence is not sufficient under the holdings of this court in the Sinclair Case, supra. This disposes of said appeal. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with directions to proceed in accordance with the opinion.

RILEY, C. J., and ANDREWS, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, OSBORN, and WELCH, JJ., concur.
Form 8082

(Rev. December 2011) 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative 

Adjustment Request (AAR) 

(For use by partners, S corporation shareholders, estate and domestic trust beneficiaries, foreign 

trust owners and beneficiaries, REMIC residual interest holders, and TMPs.) 

▶ See separate instructions. 

OMB No. 1545-0790 

Attachment 

Sequence No. 84 

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number 

Part I General Information 

1 Check boxes that apply: (a) Notice of inconsistent treatment (b) Administrative adjustment request (AAR) 

2 Identify type of pass-through entity: 

(a) Partnership (b) S corporation (c) Estate (d) Trust (e) REMIC 

3 Employer identification number of pass-through entity 

4 Name, address, and ZIP code of pass-through entity 

5 Internal Revenue Service Center where pass-through entity filed its return 

6 Tax year of pass-through entity 

/ / to / / 

7 Your tax year 

/ / to / / 

Part II Inconsistent or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR) Items 

(a) Description of inconsistent or 

administrative adjustment request (AAR) items 

(see instructions) 

(b) Inconsistency is in, 

or AAR is to correct 

(check boxes that apply) 

Amount of 

item 

Treatment 

of item 

(c) Amount as shown on 

Schedule K-1, Schedule Q, or 

similar statement, a foreign

trust statement, or your return, 

whichever applies (see 

instructions) 

(d) Amount you are reporting (e) Difference between

(c) and (d) 

 

8

9

10 

11 

Part III Explanations—Enter the Part II item number before each explanation. If more space is needed, 

continue your explanations on the back. 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 49975G Form 8082 (Rev. 12-2011) 
Form 8082 (Rev. 12-2011) Page 2 

Part III Explanations (continued)

Form 8082 (Rev. 12-2011)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), I, J. Bryan Baker, Chief Financial Officer of FirstCityFinancial Corporation (“registrant”), certify, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that:

 

(1)          the Quarterly Report of the registrant onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (“Form 10-Q”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2008 | /s/ J. Bryan Baker         |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    | J. Bryan Baker             |
| * *                | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
November 17, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SHANDELL JERALD WILLIAMS, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00193-CR

NO. 14-11-00194-CR

NO. 14-11-00195-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

These causes were heard on the records of the court below. Having considered the 

records, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgments. The Court orders the 

judgments AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2294

AN ACT

To redesignate the Post Office building located at

ing’’.the ‘‘Graham B. Purcell, Jr. Post Office Build1000 Lamar Street in Wichita Falls, Texas, as
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2294

AN ACT

To redesignate the Post Office building located at 1000

Lamar Street in Wichita Falls, Texas, as the ‘‘Graham

B. Purcell, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Post Office building located at 1000 Lamar

5 Street in Wichita Falls, Texas, and known as the Main

6 Post Office, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Graham B. Purcell, Jr. Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 2294 EH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Post

4 Office building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the Graham B. Purcell, Jr. Post Office

6 Building.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE>
                                                                                                                        EXHIBIT 12.1
                                                SOLA INTERNATIONAL INC.

                                          RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                (Dollars in thousands)
                                                      (Unaudited)

<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Year Ended March 31,
                                                                      ------------------------------------------------
                                                                        1999                1998                1997
                                                                      --------            --------            --------
<S>                                                                   <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense ............................................      $ 18,015            $ 16,988            $ 16,187
   Interest capitalized during period ..........................           167                 666                --
   Amortization of financing costs .............................           457                 429                 414
   Interest portion of rental expense ..........................         2,391               2,607               1,862
                                                                      --------            --------            --------
Total fixed charges ............................................      $ 21,030            $ 20,690            $ 18,463
                                                                      --------            --------            --------

Earnings:
   Income from continuing operations before
     income taxes ..............................................      $ 20,192            $ 75,952            $ 41,386

Fixed charges per above ........................................        21,030              20,690              18,463
Less interest capitalized during the period ....................          (167)               (666)               --
Current period amortization of interest capitalized
   in prior periods ............................................            27                --                  --
                                                                      --------            --------            --------

Earnings as adjusted ...........................................      $ 41,082            $ 95,976            $ 59,849
                                                                      ========            ========            ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .............................          1.95                4.64                3.24
                                                                      ========            ========            ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Eat at Joe’s, Ltd., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Joseph Fiore, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
November 16,
2009








/s/ Joseph
Fiore


Joseph
Fiore


CEO, CFO,
Chairman, Secretary, Director


(Principal
Executive & Accounting Officer)








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131577 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131577 COA: 259434 Van Buren CC: 03-013710-FH KENNETH MARTIN JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2006

Clerk
Order entered October 25, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00519-CV

No. 05-16-00520-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V. AND S.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968

ORDER

We REINSTATE these appeals which we abated to allow the trial court to conduct a 

hearing to determine whether certain exhibits admitted at trial are lost and can be replaced. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f). The trial court has held the hearing and made written findings. We

DEFER to the submissions panel Father’s October 20, 2016 motion for new trial based on the 

rule 34.6 findings and ORDER the parties to address, in their brief on the merits, whether 

Exhibit 1 and the CD are necessary to the appeal’s resolution. 

As the appeal has been reinstated, we ORDER the reporter’s record, tendered to the 

Clerk of the Court September 12, 2016, filed as of the date of this order. Further, because the 

parties in appellate cause number 05-16-00520-CV are the same as the parties in this appeal and 

the orders challenged in appellate cause number 05-16-00520-CV are related to the order 

challenged in this appeal, we ORDER appellate cause number 05-16-00520-CV consolidated 
into this cause number. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from 

appellate cause number 05-16-00520-CV to this cause number. For administrative purposes, 

appellate cause number 05-16-00520-CV is treated as a closed case. The parties, Dallas County 

District Clerk Felicia Pitre, and court reporters Janet Saavedra and Melva Key shall now use only 

this cause number. 

As both the reporter’s and clerk’s records have been filed, we ORDER appellant to file 

his brief on the merits no later than November 28, 2016. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre, Ms. 

Saavedra, Ms. Key, and the parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2074

AN ACT

Folklife Center for fiscal years 1994 and 1995.

To authorize appropriations for the American
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2074

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the American Folklife Center

for fiscal years 1994 and 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

4 THE AMERICAN FOLKLIFE CENTER.

5 Section 8 of the American Folklife Preservation Act

6 (20 U.S.C. 2107) is amended—

7 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘September 30,

8 1992,’’; and
2

•HR 2074 EH

1 (2) by inserting after ‘‘September 30, 1993’’

2 the following: ‘‘, $1,120,000 for the fiscal year end3 ing September 30, 1994, and $1,120,000 for the fis4 cal year ending September 30, 1995’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.