alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1971

To amend titles XVIII and XIX to treat qualified respiratory therapists

and technicians as licensed health professionals for purposes of applying

the nursing home reform requirements relating to the training of nurse

aides.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1993

Mr. SLATTERY introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend titles XVIII and XIX to treat qualified respiratory

therapists and technicians as licensed health professionals for purposes of applying the nursing home reform

requirements relating to the training of nurse aides.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respiratory Care Prac5 titioner Cost Savings and Fairness Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 1971 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN RESPIRATORY THERA2 PISTS AS LICENSED HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

3 IN APPLYING NURSE AIDE TRAINING RE4 QUIREMENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 1819(b)(5)(G) and sec6 tion 1919(b)(5)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

7 1395i–3(b)(5)(G), 1396r(b)(5)(G)) are each amended by

8 striking ‘‘or licensed or certified social worker’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘licensed or certified social worker, registered res10 piratory therapist, or certified respiratory therapy techni11 cian’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 subsection (a) shall apply to the use of an individual as

14 a nurse aide on or after the date of the enactment of this

15 Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1795 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1795

 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to assist 
   schools and educational institutions in the elimination of sexual 
                         harassment and abuse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1993

  Ms. Snowe (for herself, Ms. Woolsey, Ms. Long, Mrs. Schroeder, Ms. 
     Norton, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Slaughter, Ms. Roybal-Allard, and Ms. 
Margolies-Mezvinsky) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to assist 
   schools and educational institutions in the elimination of sexual 
                         harassment and abuse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Sexual Harassment Free Schools Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    Subparagraph (C) of section 1471(7) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``effective schools''; and
            (2) in clause (iii) of such subparagraph, by inserting ``, 
        including an environment free from sexual harassment and 
        abuse,'' after ``orderly school environment''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS.

    Paragraph (3) of section 1542 of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``effective schools''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C) of such paragraph, by inserting ``, 
        including an environment free from sexual harassment and 
        abuse,'' after ``orderly school environment''.

SEC. 4. WOMEN'S EDUCATIONAL EQUITY.

    Paragraph (1) of section 4002(a) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and (F) as (F) and 
        (G), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
                    ``(E) development and implementation of programs to 
                address sexual harassment and violence as part of 
                efforts to ensure that educational institutions are 
                free from threats to the safety of students and 
                employees;''.

SEC. 5. PROGRAMS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL HEALTH 
              EDUCATION.

    Subsection (b) of section 4605 of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7), (8), (9), and (10) as 
        (8), (9), (10), and (11), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
            ``(7) sexual harassment and assault;''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2168 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2168

   To reduce the column 1-general rate of duty on piperonyl butoxide 
                                 (PBO).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

Mr. Grandy (for himself and Mr. Castle) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reduce the column 1-general rate of duty on piperonyl butoxide 
                                 (PBO).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON PIPERONYL BUTOXIDE (PBO).

    Subchapter VI of chapter 29 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting after subheading 2932.90.20 
the following new subheading, with the article description having the 
same degree of indentation as the article description for subheading 
2932.90.30:

      

       ``  2932.90.28  Piperonyl butoxide (PBO)..........  6.3%             Free (CA, E,     15.4 cents/kg +    
                                                                             IL)              52%             ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### Michael L. CAMPBELL, a/k/a Michael Leroy Campbell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry W. POWERS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-7282.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2010.

Michael L. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, Holcombe, Bomar, Gunn & Bradford, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Campbell seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 31, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on September 10, 2010.* Because Campbell failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny *711Campbell’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Great China  International  Holdings,  Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof  (the  Report),  I, Deng Zhi Ren,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  to the best of my
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that:  (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material  respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 14, 2006
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Deng Zhi RenDeng Zhi RenChief
Executive Officer   Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.  In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Great China  International  Holdings,  Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the Report),  I, Cheng Shui San, Lawrence,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, to the best
of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002,  that:  (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material  respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 14, 2006
     
     By:
     
     /s/ Cheng Shui San, LawrenceCheng Shui San, LawrenceChief
Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great China International Holdings, Inc. and
will be retained by Great China International Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK OKEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 339 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Order entered January 23, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01092-CV

A&F ELEVATOR COMPANY, INC., Appellant

V.

MELANIE DENISE SIPHO, WILLIAM LESLIE TAYLOR AND STATE FARM 

MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-07160-E

ORDER

By order entered December 15, 2016, we granted Lloyd Ward’s motion to withdraw as 

counsel for appellant, directed appellant to notify us of the name and contact information of new 

counsel, and suspended the deadline for filing appellant’s brief pending appellant’s retainer of 

new counsel. On January 13, 2017. Megan Roper of the Law Firm of Roper & Mehler filed an 

appearance as attorney of record for appellant. Accordingly, we reinstate the briefing deadline 

and ORDER the brief be filed no later than February 23, 2017.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6402

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RHONDA KAYE SCRUGGS COOPER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-92-62, CA-96-90-R)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rhonda Kaye Scruggs Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge

Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Cooper, Nos. CR-92-62; CA-96-90-R (W.D. Va.

Jan. 13, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00133

- CV
Raymond Trent Peterek

v. Melissa Jean Allison

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law of Aransas County , Texas Trial Cause No. A

- 15

- 7029

- FL

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered t his cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order th is decision certified below for observance. May 19, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from form
10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 1997 and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        1,410,741
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     353,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,870,649
<PP&E>                                        6,297,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,223,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                7,437,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,642,310<F1>
<BONDS>                                       1,995,875 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                   1,842,483
<COMMON>                                         61,539
<OTHER-SE>                                   23,137,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  7,437,876
<SALES>                                         295,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                295,468
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,993,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              139,885<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2,790,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2,790,934)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.43)
        

<FN>
<F1>
Current liabilities include current maturities of long-term debt-stockholders of
which  $1,495,000  due  March 31, 1998,  as  amended,  is due to  officers  or
directors.
<F2>
Interest expense includes $121,202 of amortization of debt discount and
expenses, a non cash item.
</FN>

</TABLE>
# Assessing the Nutritional Quality of the FDPIR Food Package

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

Summary

Nutrient and Food Group Analysis of USDA Foods in Five of its Food and Nutrition Programs - 2014

FDPIR Food Package Nutritional Quality: Report to Congress

Healthy Eating Index Score of the FDPIR Food Package Infographic

The Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR) provides USDA Foods to income-eligible households living on Indian reservations and to American Indian households residing in approved areas near reservations or in Oklahoma. Many households participate in FDPIR as an alternative to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) because FDPIR is preferred, or they do not have easy access to SNAP offices or authorized food stores. Through FDPIR, participating households receive a supplemental food package each month to help them maintain a nutritionally balanced diet.

The purpose of this research was to measure the nutritional quality of the FDPIR food package “as offered” (foods in amounts available for participants to choose from) and “as issued” (foods in amounts that participants typically select each month) using a diet quality index referred to as the Healthy Eating Index (HEI). The HEI score is a widely used measure of the nutritional quality of food and the total HEI-2015 score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best and high scores indicating better diet quality.

This study provided an update to the first HEI estimate of the 2014 FDPIR food package. Since 2014, changes have been made to the food package and therefore it is critical for the program to assess the nutrition quality of those enhancements.​

## Key Findings

                    - The HEI-2015 score for the FDPIR food package “as offered” in FY 2022 was 84.3 based on a monthly food package of a one-person household.
                    - The HEI-2015 score for the FDPIR food package “as issued” to participants in FY 2022 was 70.3.
                    - Both scores are higher than the latest HEI-2015 scores for dietary intakes of the average American (59.0) for the years 2017-2018.

### Additional Resources

                    - Healthy Eating Index (HEI) Score of the FDPIR Food Package Infographic

Page updated: April 04, 2024
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2009

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on phospholan mixed with

ethylene glycol.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1993

Mr. BALLENGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on phospholan

mixed with ethylene glycol.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHOLAN MIXED WITH ETHYLENE GLYCOL.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 3-

(Hydroxymethylphosphinyl)-1-

propanoic acid,

2-hydroxyethyl

ester (CAS No.

68334–62–3)

(provided for in

subheading

2931.00.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•HR 2009 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RHONDA KAYE SCRUGGS COOPER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-62, CA-96-90-R) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rhonda Kaye Scruggs Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, R oanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cooper , Nos. CR-92-62; CA-96-90-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 13, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Michael
Posner, President of the Company, and Randi Swatt, acting Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Michael Posner
-----------------------------
Michael Posner, President
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 19, 2004


/s/ Randi Swatt
-------------------------------------------
Randi Swatt, acting Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2004