alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 1 0

- 579 V

(Filed: May 20, 2014)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

TAFFIE BROWN

, as the Legal Representative of *

her minor child, B.C.

, *

* Joint Stipulation of Dismissal;

Petitioner

, * Rule 21(a); No Judgment; Order

* Concluding Proceedings

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES

, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On May 20, 2014, the parties filed a joint stipulation stating that above

- captioned case

should be dismissed.

According ly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21 (a), the abo ve

- captioned case is hereby

dismissed without prejudice

. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall

not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Special Master

1 Because this unpublished order contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, it

will be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims , in accordance with

the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as

amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4)(B),

however, the part ies may object to the inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information.

Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction

“of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commer cial or financial

in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files,

the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine

Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole order will be available to the public. ( Id).
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1732 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1732

   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to require 
 States, under the program of aid to families with dependent children, 
to disregard from the income of certain stepparents an amount equal to 
     the State's standard of need for the stepparent's new family.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1993

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to require 
 States, under the program of aid to families with dependent children, 
to disregard from the income of certain stepparents an amount equal to 
     the State's standard of need for the stepparent's new family.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF STEPPARENT INCOME DISREGARD.

    (a) In General.--Section 402(a)(31)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 602(a)(31)(B)) is amended by striking ``those other 
individuals living in the same household as the dependent child and 
claimed by such stepparent as dependents for purposes of determining 
his Federal income tax liability but'' and inserting ``(i) if the 
stepparent is paying child support (pursuant to a court order or an 
order of an administrative process established under State law) and the 
family (excluding the stepparent) would be eligible for such aid if the 
stepparent were not a member of the family, those other individuals 
living in the same household as the dependent child and claimed by such 
stepparent as dependents for purposes of determining his Federal income 
tax liability, or (ii) if not, such other individuals'' after ``the 
stepparent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to payments under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act 
for calendar quarters beginning after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Weingarten Realty Investors (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Stephen C. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











BY:
            /s/
                Stephen C. RichterStephen
                C. RichterExecutive
                Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerNovember
                9, 2006











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Weingarten Realty Investors and will be retained by Weingarten and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### MANDATE



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00043

- CV
Reginald J. Hunter and Nekisha T. Hunter, Appellant s

v. The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificate Holder of CWABS, Inc., Asset

- Backed Certificates Serie s 2007

- 4, Appellee Appealed from the 190th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2014

- 55014). Opinion delivered Per Curiam.

TO THE 190TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals on April 14 , 2015 , the cause upon app eal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in these words: Today the Court heard appellee’ s motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on December 8, 2014. Having considered the m otion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant s , Reginald J. Hunter and Nekisha T. Hunter , jointly and severally

. We further order this decision certif ied below for observance. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS , the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appe als, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, June 26, 2015

.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AMY MILEN,

Appellant,

v.

FRANK MILEN,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-491

[March 18, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Nickolaus Hunter Davis, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE17-

011519.

Andrew S. Berman and Jamie Webner of Young, Berman, Karpf & 

Gonzalez, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Vanessa L. Prieto of Vanessa L. Prieto Law Offices, L.L.C., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David ZAVALA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-20256

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 29, 2010.

*858Julia Bowen Stern, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kimberly S. Keller, Keller Law Firm, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

David Zavala, Jr., was convicted of one charge of conspiracy to commit robbery and was sentenced to serve 46 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. In this appeal, he challenges his sentence, arguing that the district court erred by determining that he constructively possessed a firearm during the offense and imposing a corresponding sentencing adjustment.

When analyzing such challenges, *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007), instructs us to determine whether the sentence imposed is procedurally sound, including whether the calculation of the advisory guidelines range is correct. We review the district court’s interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. *United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez,*517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir.2008).

Our analysis shows no procedural error in connection with Zavala’s sentence. Insofar as he argues that the adjustment was improper because the firearm was possessed by a cooperating individual, this argument is refuted by the record, which shows another individual also possessed it. To the extent he contends that he could not have reasonably foreseen the use of a firearm during the robbery, this assertion is undermined by those portions of the record showing that the conspirators held a meeting and discussed using a firearm to rob an armored truck. Additionally, these parts of the record show that the district court’s conclusion regarding Zavala’s constructive possession of the firearm is plausible and thus is not clearly erroneous. *See Cisneros-Gutierrez,*517 F.3d at 764.

AFFIRMED.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Form 8038-T Arbitrage Rebate, Yield Reduction

(Rev. January 2005) and Penalty in Lieu of Arbitrage Rebate OMB No. 1545-1219

 Under Sections 143(g)(3) and 148(f)

and Sections 103(c)(6)(D) and 103A(i)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

Reporting Authority

1 Issuer’s name 2 Issuer’s employer identification number

3 Number and street (or P.O. box no. if mail is not delivered to street address) 4 Report number

5 City, town, or post office, state, and ZIP code 6 Date of issue

7 Name of issue 8 CUSIP number

Arbitrage Rebate and Yield Reduction Payments

Type of issue 

Arbitrage rebate payment (see instructions) check box if less than 100% of rebate amount

14

15

17

Did the issuer enter into a hedge?

Is the issue a variable rate issue?

Were any gross proceeds invested beyond an available temporary period?

Calculations for filing of this form prepared by:

27

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge

and belief, they are true, correct, and complete.

Sign

Here

Signature of issuer’s authorized representative Type or print name and title Date

Form 8038-T (Rev. 1-2005)

Part I

Part II



Cat. No. 11545Y

Room/suite

11

12

18

19

21

Total payment. Add lines 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 22. Enter total here

22

Computation date to which this payment relates (MMDDYYYY)

13

28

29

31

32



For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions.

Check box if Amended Return 

9 Name and title of officer or legal representative whom the IRS may call for more information 10 Telephone number of officer or legal representative

( )

16

20

23

24 Unspent proceeds as of this computation date

25 Proceeds used to redeem bonds

26 Gross proceeds used for qualified administrative costs for GICs and defeasance escrows

Fees paid for a qualified guarantee

17

28

11

13

19

23

24

25

26

Yield reduction payment (see instructions) check box if less than 100% of yield reduction amount 14

Rebate payment from Qualified Zone Academy Bond (QZAB) defeasance escrow (see instructions) 15

Part III Penalty in Lieu of Arbitrage Rebate

Number of months since date of issue:

6 mos 12 mos 18 mos 24 mos Other. No. of mos 

Penalty in lieu of rebate

Date of termination election (MMDDYYYY)

Penalty upon termination

Part IV Late Payments

Does failure to pay timely qualify for waiver of penalty (see instructions) Yes No

Penalty for failure to pay on time (see instructions)

Interest on underpayment (see instructions)

Part V Total Payment

Part VI Miscellaneous

Yes No

Term of hedge

30 Were gross proceeds invested in a GIC?

Term of GIC

22

21

29

30

31

27

7

Issue price 

Name of provider

Name of provider

Issuer Preparer:

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2181

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing suspension of duty

on Trimethyl Base.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. RAVENEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing

suspension of duty on Trimethyl Base.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRIMETHYL BASE.

4 Heading 9902.30.89 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

6 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

9 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

10 enactment of this Act.
2

•HR 2181 IH

1 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

3 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro4 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

6 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend7 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

8 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

9 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en10 actment of this Act;

11 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

12 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

13 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

14 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

15 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
(function (Drupal, $, once) {
  function checkLink(link) {
    var url = new URL(link);
    var hostname = url.hostname;
    var hostArray = hostname.split('.');
    var urlEnd = hostArray.slice(-1);
    return urlEnd;
  }
  function externalURLPopUp() {
    if (confirm($('.external-link-popup-block .field-contents').text())) {
      return true;
    } else {
      return false;
    }
  }
  Drupal.behaviors.popupMessageWindow = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      $(once('extmodal', 'a', context)).click(function() {
        if ($(this).attr('class') !== undefined) {
          var linkClass = $(this).attr('class');
          if (linkClass.includes("external-link-popup") || 
              linkClass.includes("ext-icon-before") || 
              linkClass.includes("ext-icon-after")) {
            var link = $(this).attr('href');
            var urlEnd = checkLink(link);
            if ((urlEnd != 'gov') && (urlEnd != 'mil')) {
              return externalURLPopUp();
            }
          }
        }
      });
      $(once('heroslideshow', '.slide__description .views-field-field-link a', context)).click(function() {
        var link = $(this).attr('href');
        var urlEnd = checkLink(link);
        if ((urlEnd != 'gov') && (urlEnd != 'mil')) {
          return externalURLPopUp();
        }
      });
      $(once('signupfooter', 'form.signup', context)).submit(function() {  
       return externalURLPopUp();
      });
    }
  };
})(Drupal, jQuery, once);
EXHIBIT 10.9.2

SECOND AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

Reference is hereby made to the Severance Agreement that was entered into between the undersigned and Gart Sports Company, a Delaware corporation, its
subsidiaries, its successor, or a new parent company of Gart (collectively, the "Company"), prior to August 15, 2002 and to that Amendment to Severance Agreement dated August 15, 2002
(the "First Amendment," together with the Severance Agreement collectively called the "Agreement"). This Second Amendment to Severance Agreement (the "Second Amendment") is dated as of
September 3, 2002 and constitutes an amendment to such Agreement.

In
consideration of the mutual premises set forth in the Agreement, you and the Company hereby agree to amend the Agreement to include the following:

1.    Clause 2(c)(vi) is
hereby amended by deleting the subclause number "(vi)" and inserting in lieu thereof the subclause number "(v)".

2.    The
definition of "Change in Control" is hereby amended by deleting the reference to clauses "(A) through (E)" in the first and second sentences of the last paragraph of
section 2(d)(ii) and inserting in lieu thereof "(A) through (F)".

3.    The
location of the Company's principal executive offices in Section 10(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the reference to "1001 Lincoln Avenue,
Denver CO 80203" and inserting in lieu thereof "1050 West Hampden Avenue, Englewood, CO 80110".

Other
than as set forth herein, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. All references to the Agreement herein or in any other documents
shall be deemed to include a reference to this Second Amendment. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Second Amendment to Severance Agreement have set forth their signatures.

|ACCEPTED AND AGREEED: |  | GART SPORTS COMPANY
|--------------------- |  | -------------------
|Executive:            |  |                    
|                      |  | By:                
|Print Name:           |  |                    
|Title:                |  |                    
|                      |  |                    
|Address:              |  |                    

---

QuickLinks
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 206

To require that passenger vans shall be subject to the same Federal motor

vehicle safety standards as are applicable to passenger motor vehicles

and to require manufacturers of motor vehicles to provide for dissemination to the public all vehicle warranty and repair information provided

dealers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To require that passenger vans shall be subject to the same

Federal motor vehicle safety standards as are applicable

to passenger motor vehicles and to require manufacturers

of motor vehicles to provide for dissemination to the

public all vehicle warranty and repair information provided dealers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STANDARDS FOR PASSENGER VANS.

4 (a) STANDARDS.—In the administration of the Na5 tional Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 pas6 senger vans shall be subject to the same safety standards
2

•HR 206 IH

1 as are applicable under that Act to passenger motor vehi2 cles.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef4 fect with respect to passenger vans which are manufac5 tured after 180 days after the date of the enactment of

6 this Act.

7 SEC. 2. COLLECTION AND DISSEMINATION OF WARRANTY

8 AND REPAIR INFORMATION.

9 (a) INFORMATION.—Part B of title I of the National

10 Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 is amended

11 by adding at the end the following:

12 ‘‘COLLECTION AND DISSEMINATION OF WARRANTY AND

13 REPAIR INFORMATION

14 ‘‘SEC. 161. (a) Each motor vehicle manufacturer

15 shall provide to the Secretary, in accordance with regula16 tions of the Secretary, all motor vehicle warranty and re17 pair information that the manufacturer provides to its

18 dealers. The Secretary, acting through the Auto Safety

19 Hotline of the National Traffic Safety Administration,

20 shall make the information readily available to the public.

21 ‘‘(b) A manufacturer which does not provide informa22 tion in accordance with subsection (a) shall be subject to

23 a civil penalty under section 109 and a civil action under

24 section 110.’’.
3

•HR 206 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall take effect upon the expiration of 180

3 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
December 31, 2004


 


Board of Directors


Somerset International Group, Inc. 


90 Washington Valley Road


Bedminster, NJ 07921


 


Dear Board of Directors:


 


In reference to our respective Employment Agreements dated January 6, 2004 we hereby agree to waive any claims for payment of salary and auto, mobile phone and medical benefits provided for in those Employment Agreements. We agree to this waiver from the period October 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005. 


 


Very truly yours, 


Somerset International Group, Inc. 


 


_/s/ John X. Adiletta____________


John X. Adiletta


Chief Executive Auditor


 


_/s/ Paul Patrizio_______________


Paul Patrizio


Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Acclaim Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerard F. Agoglia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    GERARD F. AGOGLIAGerard F. Agoglia Chief
Financial Officer





November 26, 2002





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.