alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of the undersigned officers and
directors of CSX Trade Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which is
to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., a Form
10-K (Annual Report) on behalf of the CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust
(issuer in respect of the CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust 6.00% Trade
Receivables Participation Certificates, Series 1998-1), hereby constitutes and
appoints Ellen M. Fitzsimmons and Rachel E. Geiersbach his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead to sign
said Form 10-K, and any and all amendments thereto, with power where appropriate
to affix the corporate seal of CSX Trade Receivables Corporation thereto and to
attest said seal, and to file said Form 10-K, and any and all other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do
and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could
do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact
and agents may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this
24th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ DAVID H. BAGGS
                                        ---------------------------
                                        David H. Baggs

                                        /s/  DAVID A. BOOR
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        David A. Boor

                                        /s/  ALLEN C. GOOLSBY, III
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Allen C. Goolsby, III

                                        /s/  LESLIE A. GRANDIS
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Leslie A. Grandis

                                       -1-
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2444

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the deductibility

of certain home office expenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1993

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. BUNNING) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to the deductibility of certain home office expenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTIBILITY OF CERTAIN HOME OFFICE EX4 PENSES.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subparagraph (A) of section

6 280A(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

7 to certain business use) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(A) as the principal place of business for

9 any trade or business of the taxpayer, or as the

10 sole fixed location of business for any trade or
2

•HR 2444 IH

1 business of the taxpayer who has no other fixed

2 location of business for such trade or business,

3 regardless of (i) the amount of time or type of

4 work the taxpayer performs in such fixed loca5 tion, or (ii) the proportion of the total income

6 from the business attributable to such loca7 tion,’’

8 (b) STORAGE OF PRODUCT SAMPLES.—Paragraph

9 (2) of section 280A(c) of such Code is amended by striking

10 ‘‘inventory’’ and inserting ‘‘inventory or product samples’’.

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the

13 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Francis Hempston McFADDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George SNYDER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7011.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2010.

Francis Hempston McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. William E.H. Creech, Joshua Bryan Royster, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Christina Ann Kelley, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francis Hempston McFadden, a District of Columbia prisoner housed in North Carolina, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McFadden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                        62,061
<SECURITIES>                  1,585,468
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,353,118
<PP&E>                        101,648
<DEPRECIATION>                (60,498)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2,397,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         967,078
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   301,700
<COMMON>                      498,348
<OTHER-SE>                    (569,353)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2,397,773
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              628,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            21,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (650,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (650,050)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        

</TABLE>
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-17646

 

 

UNITED INVESTORS INCOMEPROPERTIES

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

  Missouri                                          43-1483942

(State or other jurisdictionof                         (I.R.S. Employer

 incorporation ororganization)                        Identification No.)

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-4489)  pertaining  to the Sola  Optical 401 (K) Savings  Plan,  the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-93788)   pertaining  to  the  Sola
International  Inc. Stock Option Plan and the Sola Investors'  Stock Option Plan
of  Sola  International  Inc.  and  the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3 No.
333-45929) pertaining to the registration of $250,000,000 of common stock and/or
debt  securities  of  our  report  dated  May  6,  1998,  with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of Sola  International  Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1998.


                                                         /s/Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto, California
June 15, 1998
(function ($){
  document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => {
    getElqFormSubmissionToken('webform-submission-corp-subs-paragraph-3261-add-form', '325135053');
    processLastFormField();
  function getElqFormSubmissionToken(g, c) { 
    var e = new XMLHttpRequest(); 
    var b = document.getElementById(g); 
    if (b && b.elements.namedItem("elqFormSubmissionToken")) { 
      var f = b.action; var a = getHostName(f); 
      a = "https://" + a + "/e/formsubmittoken?elqSiteID=" + c; 
      if (a) { 
        e.onreadystatechange = function() { 
        if (e.readyState === 4) { 
          if (e.status === 200) { 
          b.elements.namedItem("elqFormSubmissionToken").value = e.responseText; 
        } 
          else { 
          b.elements.namedItem("elqFormSubmissionToken").value = ""; } 
          } 
      }; 
    e.open("GET", a, true); e.send() } else {b.elements.namedItem("elqFormSubmissionToken").value = "" } 
    } 
  }
  function getHostName(b) { 
    if (typeof window.URL === "function") { 
    return new window.URL(b).hostname; } 
    else { var a = b.match(/:\/\/(www[0-9]?\.)?(.[^\/:]+)/i); if (a !== null && a.length > 2 && typeof a[2] === "string" && a[2].length > 0) { return a[2] } else { return null } 
    } 
  }
  //call token in handleDocumentLoad
  function processLastFormField(){
    var form = document.getElementById("webform-submission-corp-subs-paragraph-3261-add-form");
    var lastFormField = form.querySelector("#elq-FormLastRow");
    lastFormField.style.display = "none";
  } 
  });
})(jQuery)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1959

To reduce until January 1, 1997, the duty on woven polypropylene cloth.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1993

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To reduce until January 1, 1997, the duty on woven

polypropylene cloth.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE CLOTH.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.54.07 Woven polypropylene cloth

(provided for in

subheading

5407.20.00) ...... 5% No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•HR 1959 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Fertilizer Supply Agreement



 

 
 Exhibit 10.ii.v 
 SUPPLY AGREEMENT 
 SPECIALTY FERTILIZERS 
 MEXICO 
  

			
	 DATE:
	  	JANUARY 4, 2006
		
	 SELLER:
	  	 FERTILIZANTES MOSAIC S. de RL de CV
 PROL.
P. DE LA REFORMA 1015; TORRE A PISO 3
 COL. DESARROLLO STA FE
 DEL. A OBREGON, C.P. 01376; MEXICO D.F.

		
	 BUYER:
	  	 AGRIBRANDS PURINA MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.
 PROL.
P. DE LA REFORMA 1015; TORRE A PISO 3
 COL. DESARROLLO STA FE
 DEL. A OBREGON, C.P. 01376; MEXICO D.F.

		
	 PRODUCT:
	  	SODIUM NITRATE WITH SILICATES AS FERTILIZER ADAPTED FOR AQUACULTURE PURPOSES
		
	 SPECIFICATIONS:
	  	TYPICAL MOSAIC SPECIFICATIONS
		
	 MARKET:
	  	MEXICO
		
	 PERIOD:
	  	JANUARY 2006 – DECEMBER 2006
		
	 PRICING:
	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	 QUANTITY:
	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	 DELIVERY:
	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	 PAYMENT:
	  	10 DAYS
		
	 TERMS:
	  	MOSAIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO APPLY. (ATTACHED)

  

									
	 FERTILIZANTES MOSIAC S. DE.
 R.L. DE C.V.
	 		  	 AGRIBRANDS PURINA MEXICO, S.A.
 DE C.V.

					
	 By:
	 	  
	 		  	 By:
	  	  

	 Name:
	 	  
	 		  	 Name:
	  	  

	 Its:
	 	  
	 		  	 Its:
EX-10.7





 Exhibit 10.7 
  

 
 



 
 August 8, 2016 
 Allan
Dicks 
 Re: Executive Compensation Package 
 Dear
Allan: 
 The following summarizes the terms of your executive compensation package, which is conditioned upon the commencement of your employment with
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. In addition to company benefit plans offered to you from time to time by the Company, you shall be eligible for the following compensation package: 

Title: Chief Financial Officer 
 Base
Compensation: $200,000 per year 
 Cash Bonus Program: The cash bonus program you are eligible for will be separately determined based on
criteria set by the board of directors of Montrose and Vijay Manthripragada, Chief Executive Officer, and all payments thereunder remain subject to board approval. 

IPO/Change in Control Cash Bonus Amount: $1,000,000 shall be payable to you in cash upon the occurrence of a change in control or effectiveness of an
Initial Public Offering of the Company. A change in control shall be defined as set forth in the Company’s equity incentive plan. 
 Equity
Incentive Award: You will be granted 5,000 options under the Company’s equity incentive program. The options shall vest over a four year period, with 50% vesting at the second anniversary of the vesting start date and the remaining 50%
vesting at the fourth anniversary of the vesting start date. The options shall fully accelerate upon a change in control of the Company (not including an Initial Public Offering) as set forth in the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 2013 Amended
and Restated Stock Option Plan. 
 Severance Upon Termination Without Cause Following a Change in Control: If you are terminated without cause or
terminate your employment for good reason within twelve (12) months following a change in control of the Company, you shall be entitled to receive severance in the amount of one year of your then-current base salary, which may be payable in
lump sum or as continued compensation during the 12 month severance period, as determined by the Company. 
 We look forward to your future success with
Montrose. 
 Regards, 
 /s/ Vijay Manthripragada 

Vijay Manthripragada 
 Chief Executive Officer 

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 
  

							
	 Global Headquarters

1 Park Plaza
 Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92614
	  	 T: 949.988.3500
 F: 949.988.3514

info@montrose-env.com
 www.montrose-env.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FERNANDO JOSUE ROJAS CASADO,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF PENNSYLVANIA AND COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 82 MAP 2023

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 71 MD 2023 dated May 22, 2023.

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: April 25, 2024

AND NOW, this 25 th day of April , 2024

, t he Memorandum Order of the

Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED

. Appellant’s Petition for Leave to file Reply Brief

Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED

.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-130-1020-PH; GP01-0104]


Eastern Washington Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District.

ACTION: Notice of the meeting of the Eastern Washington Advisory 
Council; March 22, 2001, in Spokane, Washington.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council 
will be held on March 22, 2001. The meeting will convene at 9 a.m., at 
the Spokane District Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1103 North 
Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington 99212-1275. The meeting will adjourn 
upon conclusion of business, but no later than 4 p.m. Public comments 
will be heard from 10 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. If necessary, to 
accommodate all wishing to make public comments, a time limit may be 
placed upon each speaker. At an appropriate time, the meeting will 
adjourn for approximately one hour for lunch. Topics to be discussed 
include Election of Chair, Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management 
Project Status Report, BLM Work Plan for FY 2001, BLM/Forest Service 
Fire Program, Charter Renewal and Next Meeting Scheduling.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Spokane 
District Office, 1103 N. Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington 99212; or 
call 509-536-1200.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Joseph K. Buesing,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-4466 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
#### Eddie Dean DOGAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Colie L. RUSHTON, Warden; Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 06-7400.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2007.

Decided: March 28, 2007.

Eddie Dean Dogan, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Dean Dogan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *285§ 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Dogan that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Dogan failed to note specific objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). We agree with the district court that Dogan’s objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation were not sufficiently specific. Therefore, Dogan has waived appellate review by failing to timely file *specific*objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### David JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, Respondent.

No. 2011-3064.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 28, 2011.

David Johnson, Oak Park, IL, pro se.

ON MOTION

ORDER

David Johnson moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

The motion is granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joey
A. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jack E. Polson, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:May 15, 2003

                                                /s/ Joey A. Jacobs
                                                ------------------

                                                Joey A. Jacobs
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Jack E. Polson
                                                ------------------

                                                Jack E. Polson
                                                Chief Accounting Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.