Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2001 / Notices 10909

ceremony. Lastly, pursuant to 43 CFR

10.2 (e), officials of the Colorado

Historical Society have determined that,

based upon traditional territories and

oral traditions, there is a relationship of

shared group identity that can be

reasonably traced between these Native

American human remains and the

Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma;

Comanche Indian Tribe, Oklahoma; Fort

Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma; Kiowa

Indian Tribe of Oklahoma; Northern

Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern

Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana;

Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge

Reservation, South Dakota; Pawnee

Nation of Oklahoma; Rosebud Sioux

Tribe of the Rosebud Indian

Reservation, South Dakota; Southern

Ute Indian Tribe of the Southern Ute

Reservation, Colorado; Three Affiliated

Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation,

North Dakota; Ute Indian Tribe of the

Uintah & Ouray Reservation, Utah; and

Ute Mountain Tribe of the Ute Mountain

Reservation, Colorado, New Mexico &

Utah.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma;

Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River

Reservation, Wyoming; CheyenneArapaho Tribes of Oklahoma; Cheyenne

River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River

Reservation, South Dakota; Comanche

Indian Tribe, Oklahoma; Crow Tribe of

Montana; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the

Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota;

Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma;

Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Jicarilla Apache

Tribe of the Jicarilla Apache Indian

Reservation, New Mexico; Kiowa Indian

Tribe of Oklahoma; Mescalero Apache

Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New

Mexico; Navajo Nation, Arizona, New

Mexico & Utah; Northern Cheyenne

Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian

Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux

Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation,

South Dakota; Pawnee Nation of

Oklahoma; Pueblo of Acoma, New

Mexico; Pueblo of Cochiti, New Mexico;

Pueblo of Isleta, New Mexico; Pueblo of

Jemez, New Mexico; Pueblo of Laguna,

New Mexico; Pueblo of Nambe, New

Mexico; Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico;

Pueblo of Pojoaque, New Mexico;

Pueblo of San Felipe, New Mexico;

Pueblo of San Juan, New Mexico;

Pueblo of San Ildefonso, New Mexico;

Pueblo of Sandia, New Mexico; Pueblo

of Santa Ana, New Mexico; Pueblo of

Santa Clara, New Mexico; Pueblo of

Santo Domingo, New Mexico; Pueblo of

Taos, New Mexico; Pueblo of Tesuque,

New Mexico, Pueblo of Zia, New

Mexico; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the

Rosebud Indian Reservation, South

Dakota; Shoshone Tribe of the Wind

River Reservation, Wyoming; ShoshoneBannock Tribes of the Fort Hall

Reservation of Idaho; Southern Ute

Indian Tribe of the Southern Ute

Reservation, Colorado; Standing Rock

Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota;

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort

Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Ute

Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray

Reservation, Utah; Ute Mountain Tribe

of the Ute Mountain Reservation,

Colorado, New Mexico & Utah; Wichita

and Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi,

Waco & Tawakonie), Oklahoma; and

Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New

Mexico. Representatives of any other

Indian tribe that believes itself to be

culturally affiliated with these human

remains should contact Anne W. Bond,

Director of Collections and Exhibitions,

Colorado Historical Society, 1300

Broadway, Denver, CO 80203–2137,

telephone (303) 866–4691, before March

22, 2001. Repatriation of the human

remains to the Cheyenne-Arapaho

Tribes of Oklahoma; Comanche Indian

Tribe, Oklahoma; Fort Sill Apache Tribe

of Oklahoma; Kiowa Indian Tribe of

Oklahoma; Northern Cheyenne Tribe of

the Northern Cheyenne Indian

Reservation, Montana; Oglala Sioux

Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation,

South Dakota; Pawnee Nation of

Oklahoma; Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the

Rosebud Indian Reservation, South

Dakota; Southern Ute Indian Tribe of

the Southern Ute Reservation, Colorado;

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort

Berthold Reservation, North Dakota; Ute

Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray

Reservation, Utah; and Ute Mountain

Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation,

Colorado, New Mexico & Utah may

begin after that date if no additional

claimants come forward.

Dated: January 30, 2001.

John Robbins,

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources

Stewardship and Partnerships.

[FR Doc. 01–4080 Filed 2–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Notice of Inventory Completion for

Native American Human Remains and

Associated Funerary Objects in the

Possession of the Peabody Museum of

Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard

University, Cambridge, MA

AGENCY: National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice.

Notice is hereby given in accordance

with provisions of the Native American

Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

(NAGPRA), 43 CFR 10.9, of the

completion of an inventory of human

remains and associated funerary objects

in the possession of the Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology,

Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

This notice is published as part of the

National Park Service’s administrative

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 43 CFR

10.2 (c). The determinations within this

notice are the sole responsibility of the

museum, institution, or Federal agency

that has control of these Native

American human remains and

associated funerary objects. The

National Park Service is not responsible

for the determinations within this

notice.

A detailed assessment of the human

remains was made by the Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology

professional staff in consultation with

representatives of the Choctaw Nation of

Oklahoma; the Jena Band of Choctaw

Indians, Louisiana; and the Mississippi

Band of Choctaw Indians, Mississippi.

Between 1844–1866, human remains

representing one individual were

recovered from near Mobile, Mobile

County, AL, by Dr. Josiah C. Nott. In

1916, these human remains were gifted

to the Peabody Museum of Archaeology

and Ethnology by the Boston Society of

Natural History as part of the White

collection. No known individual was

identified. No associated funerary

objects are present.

Museum documentation identifies

this individual as a ‘‘Choctaw youth.’’

The attribution of such a specific

cultural affiliation to the human

remains indicates that the interment

postdates sustained contact between

indigenous groups and Europeans

beginning in the 17th century. The

human remains were recovered from an

area commonly considered to be

traditional Choctaw territory. Oral

traditions and historic evidence support

the cultural affiliation to the Choctaw

Nation of Oklahoma, and the

Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians,

Mississippi. The Jena Band of Choctaw

Indians, Louisiana, does not consider

Alabama to be part of their traditional

territory.

Based on the above-mentioned

information, officials of the Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology

have determined that, pursuant to 43

CFR 10.2 (d)(1), the human remains

listed above represent the physical

remains of one individual of Native

American ancestry. Officials of the

Peabody Museum of Archaeology and

Ethnology also have determined that,

pursuant to 43 CFR 10.2 (e), there is a

relationship of shared group identity

10910 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2001 / Notices

that can be reasonably traced between

these Native American human remains

and the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma,

and the Mississippi Band of Choctaw

Indians.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma,

and the Mississippi Band of Choctaw

Indians. Representatives of any other

Indian tribe that believes itself to be

culturally affiliated with these human

remains should contact Barbara Isaac,

Repatriation Coordinator, Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology,

Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue,

Cambridge, MA 02138, telephone (617)

495–2254, before March 20, 2001.

Repatriation of the human remains to

the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, and

the Mississippi Band of Choctaw

Indians may begin after that date if no

additional claimants come forward.

Dated: January 30, 2001.

John Robbins,

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources

Stewardship and Partnerships.

[FR Doc. 01–4079 Filed 2–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Notice of Intent to Repatriate a Cultural

Item in the Possession of the Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and

Ethnology, Harvard University,

Cambridge, MA

AGENCY: National Park Service

ACTION: Notice

Notice is hereby given under the

Native American Graves Protection and

Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 43 CFR

10.10 (a)(3), of the intent to repatriate a

cultural item in the possession of the

Peabody Museum of Archaeology and

Ethnology, Cambridge, MA, that meets

the definition of ‘‘unassociated funerary

object’’ under Section 2 of the Act.

This notice is published as part of the

National Park Service’s administrative

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 43 CFR

10.2 (c). The determinations within this

notice are the sole responsibility of the

museum, institution, or Federal agency

that has control of this cultural item.

The National Park Service is not

responsible for the determinations

within this notice.

The one cultural item is a buffalo

horn spoon.

In 1880, the cultural item was

collected in Montana by Ernest T.

Jackson. In 1946, Patrick T. Jackson

donated this cultural item to the

Peabody Museum of Archaeology and

Ethnology.

Museum records indicate that this

cultural item was removed from a Crow

grave in Montana. The specific cultural

affiliation indicates that the collector

was aware of the cultural affiliation of

the burial, and suggests that it dates to

historic times. Based on the specific

cultural attribution in museum records,

the probable 19th-century date of the

burial, and the geographical location of

origin within the historical territory of

the Crow Tribe of Montana, this cultural

item is considered to be affiliated with

the Crow Tribe of Montana.

Based on the above-mentioned

information, officials of the Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology

have determined that, pursuant to 43

CFR 10.2 (d)(2)(ii), this cultural item is

reasonably believed to have been placed

with or near individual human remains

at the time of death or later as part of

the death rite or ceremony and is

believed, by a preponderance of the

evidence, to have been removed from a

specific burial site of a Native American

individual. Officials of the Peabody

Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology

also have determined that, pursuant to

43 CFR 10.2 (e), there is a relationship

of shared group identity that can be

reasonably traced between this cultural

item and the Crow Tribe of Montana.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Crow Tribe of Montana.

Representatives of any other Indian tribe

that believes itself to be culturally

affiliated with this unassociated

funerary object should contact Barbara

Isaac, Repatriation Coordinator,

Peabody Museum of Archaeology and

Ethnology, Harvard University, 11

Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA

02138, telephone (617) 495–2254, before

March 22, 2001. Repatriation of this

unassociated funerary object to the

Crow Tribe of Montana may begin after

that date if no additional claimants

come forward.

Dated: January 30, 2001.

John Robbins,

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources

Stewardship and Partnerships.

[FR Doc. 01–4081 Filed 2–16–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE

UNITED STATES

Revision of Certain Dollar Amounts in

the Bankruptcy Code Prescribed Under

Section 104(b) of the Code

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the

United States.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Certain dollar amounts in title

11, United States Code, are increased.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Francis F. Szczebak, Chief, Bankruptcy

Judges Division, Administrative Office

of the United States Courts, Washington,

DC 20544, telephone (202) 502–1900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

108 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of

1994 established the mechanism for the

automatic three-year adjustment of

dollar amounts in certain sections of the

Bankruptcy Code by adding subsection

(b) to section 104 of title 11. That

provision states:

(b)(1) On April 1, 1998, and at each

3-year interval ending April 1 thereafter,

each dollar amount in effect under [the

designated sections of the code]

immediately before such April 1 shall

be adjusted—

(A) to reflect the change in the

Consumer Price Index for All Urban

Consumers, published by the

Department of Labor, for the most recent

3-year period ending immediately

before January 1 preceding such April 1,

and

(B) to round to the nearest $25 the

dollar amount that represents such

change.

(2) Not later than March 1, 1998, and

at each 3-year interval ending on March

1 thereafter, the Judicial Conference of

the United States shall publish in the

Federal Register the dollar amounts that

will become effective on such April 1

under sections 109(e), 303(b), 507(a),

522(d), and 523(a)(2)(C) [of the

Bankruptcy Code].

(3) Adjustments made in accordance

with paragraph (1) shall not apply with

respect to cases commenced before the

date of such adjustments.

Revision of Certain Dollar Amounts in

Bankruptcy Code

Notice is hereby given that the dollar

amounts are increased in the sections in

title 11, United States Code, as set out

in the following chart. These increases

do not apply to cases commenced before

the effective date of the adjustments,

i.e., April 1, 2001. Official Bankruptcy

Forms 6E and 10 also will be amended

to reflect these adjusted dollar amounts.

Dated: February 13, 2001.

Francis F. Szczebak,

Chief, Bankruptcy Judges Division.