alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending February 2, 2001

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2001-8823.
    Date Filed: January 30, 2001.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: February 20, 2001.
    Description
    Application of Express One International pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 
Section 41102 and Part 201, Subpart B of Part 302, applies for the 
issuance of a certificate of public convenience and necessity 
authorizing Express One to provide scheduled foreign air transportation 
of property and mail between any point or points in the United States 
and any point or territory or possession in the United States and any 
point or points in the countries listed in this application.
    Docket Number: OST-2001-8848.
    Date Filed: February 2, 2001.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: February 23, 2001.
    Description
    Application of Air Canada Regional Inc. pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 
Section 41301, and Subpart Q, applies for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit 
that would enable Air Canada Regional to hold out scheduled foreign air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or 
points in Canada, and any point or points in the United States, and to 
engage in foreign charter operations pursuant to the Department's 
charter regulations.

Dorothy Y. Beard,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 01-4274 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Exhibit 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Symbollon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack H.
Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: March 30, 2004          /s/ Jack H. Kessler
                              -----------------------------------
                              Jack H. Kessler
                              Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              30
<SECURITIES>                                        18
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,439
<INVENTORY>                                     26,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,245
<PP&E>                                          42,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,845
<BONDS>                                         86,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,080
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,737
<SALES>                                        106,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,884
<CGS>                                           54,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   522
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (342)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                932
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       932
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
Exhibit (3) (j)




                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF
                        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                     OF
                               BCLP GP, INC.,
                           A DELAWARE CORPORATION

      BCLP GP, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and 
existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the 
"DGCL"), does hereby certify that:


      FIRST:  The Board of Directors of the Corporation, by unanimous 
written consent of its members, adopted a resolution setting forth and 
declaring a proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the 
Corporation to be advisable and calling for consideration thereof by the 
stockholders of the Corporation.  The resolution setting forth the proposed 
amendment is as follows:


              NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board hereby 
              proposes that Article I of the Corporation's Certificate of 
              Incorporation be amended (the "Corporation Name Amendment") to 
              change the name of the Corporation to "BCLP II GP, Inc.," 
              subject to approval by the holders of a majority of the 
              outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon, 
              so that it shall read in its entirety:

                                  ARTICLE I

                             NAME OF CORPORATION

                      The name of this corporation is:

                              BCLP II GP, Inc.

      SECOND:  The stockholders of the Corporation considered and voted 
unanimously in favor of the Corporation Name Amendment.

      THIRD:  The Corporation Name Amendment was duly adopted in accordance 
with the provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the DGCL.

      FOURTH:  That this Certificate of Amendment shall be effective as of 
June 30, 1998 at 8:01 A.M. Eastern Standard Time.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of 
Amendment on this 29th day of June, 1998.

                                  BCLP GP, INC.
                                  /s/    Richard G. Pond
                                  By:    Richard G. Pond
                                  Its:   Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1938

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the special

$15,000,000 limitation on the amount of a tax-exempt bond issue which

may be used to provide an output facility.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. OLVER, Mr.

STUDDS, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. JOHNSON of

Connecticut, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. Crane,

and Mr. WILSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the special $15,000,000 limitation on the amount of a

tax-exempt bond issue which may be used to provide

an output facility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF $15,000,000 LIMITATION ON AMOUNT

4 OF TAX-EXEMPT BOND ISSUE WHICH MAY BE

5 USED TO PROVIDE AN OUTPUT FACILITY.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 141 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to private
2

•HR 1938 IH

1 business tests) is amended by striking paragraph (4) and

2 by redesignating paragraphs (5) through (9) as para3 graphs (4) through (8), respectively.

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of

5 section 141(d) of such Code is amended by striking

6 ‘‘(within the meaning of subsection (b)(4))’’.

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date

9 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Klamath Fishery Management Council, established under the authority of the Klamath River Basin Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 460ss*et seq.*). The Klamath Fishery Management Council makes recommendations to agencies that regulate harvest of anadromous fish in the Klamath River Basin. The objectives of this meeting are to hear technical reports (including the ocean stock projection for Klamath River fall chinook in 2001), review the 2000 fishery season, and discuss and plan management of the 2001 season. The meeting is open to the public.                     

# DATES:

The Klamath Fishery Management Council will meet from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Thursday, February 22, 2001; and from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. on Friday, February 23, 2001. 

*Place:*                         The meeting will be held at the Yurok Tribal Office, Highway 96, Weitchpec, California.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Ronald A. Iverson, Project Leader, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1829 South Oregon Street, Yreka, California 96097, telephone (530) 842-5763. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    For background information on the Klamath Council, please refer to the notice of their initial meeting that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 8, 1987 (52 FR 25639).                 

Dated: February 7, 2001.

Elizabeth H. Stevens, 

Acting California/Nevada Operations Manager, California/Nevada Office, Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 01-3991 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
EXHIBIT 10.5


    EXHIBIT
      10.5

    


    SECOND
      AMENDMENT TO LETTER OF INTENT

    


    It
      is
      hereby agreed as of May 26, 2006 by and between Quick Med Technologies, Inc.
      (“Quick Med”) and Engelhard Long Island, Inc. (“Engelhard”) (collectively
      referred to as “the parties”) that:

    


    1. Reference
      is hereby made to the Letter of Intent effective February 1, 2006 (the “LOI”)
      entered into between Engelhard and Quick Med.

    


    2. Sections
      2,3 and 4 of the LOI are hereby amended by deleting the date “May 26, 2006” and
      replacing it with the date “June 16, 2006”.

    


    3. Except
      as
      amended hereby, the LOI is hereby ratified and confirmed in its
      entirety.

    


    WITNESS
      the execution hereof as of the date first above written.

    


    ENGELHARD
      LONG ISLAND, INC.

    


    By:
      /s/ Joseph Ceccoli 

    Title:
      Global Director of  Operations

    


    QUICK
      MED
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    


    By:
      /s/ Michael Granito 

    Title:
      Chairman
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10917-10918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,276]

Coach; A Subsidiary of Sara Lee Corporation, Medley, FL; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the U.S. Department Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 4, 2000 
applicable to workers of Coach, Medley, Florida. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2000 (65 FR 80458).

[[Page 10918]]

    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Information provided by 
the State shows that Coach is a subsidiary of Sara Lee Corporation. 
Some workers at the subject firms' Medley, Florida facility have had 
their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax 
account for Sara Lee Corporation. The workers were engaged in the 
production of leather handbags and accessories.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending the 
certification to properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Coach who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-38,276 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Coach, a subsidiary of Sara Lee Corporation, 
Medley, Florida, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after October 24, 1999 through December 4, 2000 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 7th day of February, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-4121 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
947 A.2d 724

#### CONSTRUCTO TEMPS, INC. and Workers’ Compensation Security Fund v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (Gregory Tennant) Appeal of Gregory Tennant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 3, 2008.

Decided May 30, 2008.

*603Gary D. Monaghan, Esq., Monaghan & Monaghan, L.L.P., Uniontown, for Gregory Tennant.

Amber Marie Kenger, Esq., Richard C. Lengler, Esq., Workers Compensation Appeal Board, Harrisburg, for Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board.

Karen M. Balaban, Esq., for Constructo Temps, Inc.

BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., and SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD and MCCAFFERY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2008, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

Further, Appellees’ Motion to Strike Portions of Appellant’s Brief is GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>0001038358
<NAME>IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, L.P. - 1996
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,025,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                 219,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 900,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        553,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     320,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   900,938
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,698
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05


</TABLE>
House Calendar No. 79

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2223

[Report No. 103–226]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 525

Smith Federal Building’’.Griffin Street in Dallas, Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo

SEPTEMBER 9, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 79

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2223

[Report No. 103–226]

To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in Dallas,

Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1993

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

SEPTEMBER 9, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin

Street in Dallas, Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street

5 in Dallas, Texas, is designated as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith

6 Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 2223 RH

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

3 map, or other paper of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

5 the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal Building’’.
EXHIBIT 99.2





                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, L. Ray Adams, Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and
     Treasurer of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc., certify that, to the best of my
     knowledge, the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
     fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form
     10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. .



     /s/ L. Ray Adams
     -------------------------------
     L. Ray Adams
     Vice President-Finance,
     Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
#### William Clayton McKINNEDY, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cecilia R. REYNOLDS, Respondent-Appellee. William Clayton McKinnedy, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cecilia R. Reynolds, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 10-7119, 10-7180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 26, 2011.

William Clayton McKinnedy, III, Appellant Pro Se.

*708Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Clayton McKinnedy, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2006). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McKinnedy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. McKinnedy’s motion for relief from retaliation is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*