alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10509-10510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AZ-910-0777-26-241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory Council Tour notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a tour of the Arizona Resource Advisory 
Council (RAC). A pre-tour briefing will be conducted on March 16, 2001 
from 8-9 a.m. at the BLM Safford Field Office located at 711 14th 
Avenue, Safford, Arizona. BLM staff will provide a review of the 
Standards for Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Grazing 
Administration (S&Gs) and the implementation process. After the one-
hour briefing, BLM staff and RAC will tour a BLM grazing allotment 
called Johnny Creek near Safford. The tour objectives are to provide 
the RAC with field training on resource evaluation and on-the-ground 
S&G application. In addition, the RAC will travel to the San Simon 
Valley to learn about the planning effort set to begin on the San Simon 
Watershed. The tour will conclude between 3-4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land 
Management, Arizona State Office, 222

[[Page 10510]]

North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2203, (602) 417-9215.

Joanie Losacco,
(Acting) Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 01-3797 Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
Skip to main content    

      Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission    

En Español

            - About FMSHRC               - News
              - Commissioners
              - Chairman and Commissioner Tenure
              - Administrative Law Judges
            - Guides               - Frequently Asked Questions
              - FOIA Guide
              - How a Case Proceeds Before the Commission
              - Guide to Commission Proceedings
              - Requests to Reopen
              - Instructions for Electronic Filing
              - Videoconference Hearings
              - Section 105(c)(3) Complaints
            - Decisions               - Review Commission Decisions
              - ALJ Decisions
              - Blue Books
            - Review Commission Arguments & Meetings               - Oral Arguments
              - Meetings
            - The Mine Act & Procedural Rules               - The Mine Act
              - Procedural Rules
              - Changes to Procedural Rules
            - FOIA               - Submit a FOIA Request
              - FOIA Guide
              - Rules
              - FOIA References
              - FOIA Library
              - FOIA Public Liaison
              - FOIA Reports
              - Proposed FOIA Rules
            - Reports & Budget Submissions               - Strategic Plans
              - Budget and Annual Performance Reports
              - Buy American Reports
              - Performance Accountability Reports
              - Sustainability Report
              - Reports to Congress
              - Contingency Plan
              - Reports to the President
            - Cases on Review               - Cases Currently on Review Before the Commission
              - Commission Decisions On Appeal
            - Contact Us

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-                   FY2007              

#   FY2007

##           Downloads        

fy07budget_0.pdf

fy07budget_0.htm

##### Footer Links

-  EEO Policies 
-  No Fear Act Notice 
-  Employee Ethical Conduct 
-  Equal Access to Justice Act 
-  Motions to Approve Settlement 
-  Non-Discrimination 
-  Reasonable Accommodation Procedures 
-  Privacy Act 
-  Sunshine Act Regulations 
-  USA.gov 
-  FMSHRC Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

### The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

#### 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Suite 520NWashington, DC 20004-1710Phone: 771-210-1887 TTY/TDD (202)434-4000 ext. 293E-mail: fmshrc@fmshrc.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before March 23, 2001, to be assured of consideration. 

## Bureau of the Public Debt (PD) 

*OMB Number:*                     1535-0096.                 

*Form Number:*                     PD F 1993.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Reinvestment Application.                 

*Description:*                     PD F 1993 is used to request proceeds of matured Series H Savings Bonds be invested in Series HH Savings Bonds.                

*Respondents:*                     Individuals or households.                 

*Estimated Number of Respondents:*                     20,000.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent:*                     15 minutes.                 

*Frequency of Response:*                     On occasion.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden Hours:*                     5,000 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Vicki S. Thorpe (304) 480-6553, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West VA 26106-1328.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Lois K. Holland, 

Departmental Reports, Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-4177 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-40-U
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack E. Polson, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                      /s/ Jack E. Polson
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Jack E. Polson
                                                      Chief Accounting Officer
                                                      November 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for
the periods indicated.
  /s/ Robert L. ButchofskyRobert L. ButchofskyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
662 S.E.2d 599

#### In the Matter of John A. PINCELLI, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 2, 2008.

ORDER

By opinion dated June 25, 2007, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law in this state for two years, retroactive to August 10, 2005, the date of his interim suspension. *In the Matter of Pincelli,*374 S.C. 156, 648 S.E.2d 578 (2007). Petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends the petition be denied. We disagree with the recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of laiy in this state.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, COSTA M. PLEICONES, and DONALD W. BEATTY, JJ.

WALLER, J., not participating.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementsNo. 333-74736, 333-23849, 33-87988 and 33-87990 of Pacific Crest Capital, Inc.on Forms S-8 of our report dated January 30, 2003 (March 20, 2003 as to Note27), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Crest Capital,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 
| DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      |
| Los Angeles, California   |
| March  31, 2003      |
|                      |

 

----
**FEDERALMINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION**

 

SUNSHINE ACT NOTICE

 

BAC 6735-01

 

January 27, 2015

 

 

TIMEAND DATE:                10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 5, 2015

 

PLACE:                                  TheRichard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,Washington, DC 20004 (enter from    F Street entrance)

 

STATUS:                                Open

 

MATTERSTO BE 

CONSIDERED:                     TheCommission will consider and act upon the following in open session: *Secretaryof Labor v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.,*Docket No. SE 2011-407-R; and *Secretaryof Labor v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.*, Docket No. SE 2012-681-R (Issuesinclude whether the Administrative Law Judges erred in upholding certainimminent danger orders.)

 

 

 

 

Any person attending this meeting who requires specialaccessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign languageinterpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs.  Subject to29 C.F.R. § 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

 

 

CONTACTPERSON 

FOR MORE INFO:                EmogeneJohnson (202) 434-9935 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD

                                                Relay/ 1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

 

 

 

 

 

                                                __________________________________

                                                SarahL. Stewart

                                                DeputyGeneral Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3503236
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11792631
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      1818284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17817898
<PP&E>                                         147129065
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48485523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150764887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14654202
<BONDS>                                         17856397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                        43504353
<OTHER-SE>                                      49882521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150764887
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49942213
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32925689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1131960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12300944
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4728539
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7091988
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7091988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.545
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.542
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0001943 31-MAR-2014 10:21 AM
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00150-CR

BRANDON JOREL SCOTT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 28958

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brandon Jorel Scott pled guilty to the fraudulent use or possession of identifying 

information.

1 Pursuant to a plea bargain with the State, Scott was sentenced to five years’

imprisonment.2 The trial court certified that this was a plea-bargain case and that Scott had no 

right of appeal; nonetheless, Scott, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that 

we are without jurisdiction over this case because of Scott’s plea bargain with the State, we 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea-bargain cases. 

Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:

(2) . . . . In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s 

plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a

defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on 

before trial,

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or

(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court that Scott met 

any of these requirements. To the contrary, the trial court’s certification of Scott’s right of 

appeal indicates that he has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of 

1TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 32.51(c)(2) (Supp.).

2

In conjunction with the plea agreement, Scott waived his right of appeal. 
3

Appellate Procedure, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s 

certification indicates no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

We informed Scott of this apparent defect in our jurisdiction over his appeal and afforded 

him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. Scott did not respond to our 

letter.

Because Scott has no right of appeal as a result of his plea bargain with the State and 

because the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we 

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jeff Rambin

Justice

Date Submitted: October 3, 2023

Date Decided: October 4, 2023

Do Not Publish
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 28, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30926

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES H. MURUNGI,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, 

Successor in interest to Mercedes Benz Credit Corporation,

 Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-1778-N

--------------------------------------------------------------

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James H. Murungi appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civilsuit as frivolous and

as barred by res judicata, and from the imposition of sanctions pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 11(c).

Murungi argues that the district court erred in determining that his case was barred by the doctrine

ofres judicata since the defendant’s alleged filing of false credit reports constituted new grounds of

relief that arose subsequent to the adjudication of Murungi’s prior cases. Under this rationale,
-2-

Murungi contends that Rule 11 sanctions were improperly imposed. Murungi also asserts that the

magistrate judge erred in denying his motion to amend his complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and hold that the district

court neither erred in dismissing Murungi’s complaint as barred by res judicata, nor abused its

discretion in imposing Rule 11 sanctions. See Mowbray v. Cameron County, Tex., 274 F.3d 269,

281 (5thCir. 2001);Krimv. BancTexas Group, Inc., 99 F.3d 775, 777 (5thCir. 1996). Furthermore,

the magistrate judge’s denial without prejudice of Murungi’s motion to amend his complaint did not

constitute an abuse of discretion. See McKinney v. Irving Indep. Sch. Dist., 309 F.3d 308, 312 (5th

Cir. 2002), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 2003 WL 162789 (Feb. 24, 2003).

 The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
Exhibit 23.1  CONSENT OF UHY LLP,
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11465,
333-97261, and 333-144632) on Form S-8 of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.
of our reports dated March 13, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  /S/  UHY
LLP  Boston,
Massachusetts March 13,
2009
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18

- 2561

_____________________________

J ONATHAN M ATHIS

,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Mark Borello, Judge.

February 12, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

R OBERTS

, W ETHERELL

, and M AKAR

, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jonathan Mathis, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
SCHEDULE O 

(Form 8865) 2016

Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership 

(under section 6038B)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

▶ Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

▶ Information about Schedule O (Form 8865) and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8865.

OMB No. 1545-1668

Name of transferor Filer’s identifying number

Name of foreign partnership EIN (if any) Reference ID number (see instructions)

Part I Transfers Reportable Under Section 6038B

Other 

property

Intangible 

property

Tangible 

property 

used in trade 

or business

Inventory

Stock, notes 

receivable and 

payable, and other 

securities

Type of 

property

(a) 

Date of 

transfer

(b) 

Number of

items

transferred

(c) 

Fair market 

value on date 

of transfer

(d) 

Cost or other 

basis

(e) 

Section 704(c)

allocation

method

(f) 

Gain recognized on

transfer

(g) 

Percentage interest 

in partnership after

transfer

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions):

Part II Dispositions Reportable Under Section 6038B

(a) 

Type of 

property

(b) 

Date of 

original 

transfer

(c) 

Date of

disposition

(d) 

Manner of 

disposition

(e) 

Gain 

recognized by

partnership

(f) 

Depreciation

recapture 

recognized 

by partnership

(g) 

Gain allocated 

to partner

(h) 

Depreciation 

recapture allocated to 

partner

Part III Is any transfer reported on this schedule subject to gain recognition under section 904(f)(3) or 

section 904(f)(5)(F)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶ Yes No

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25909U Schedule O (Form 8865) 2016
Exhibit 32


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies
International, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael Posner, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



                                                     /s/ Michael Posner
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Michael Posner, President
                                                     August 14, 2003
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies
International, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen H. Durland, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




                                   /s/ Stephen Durland
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Stephen H. Durland, Chief Financial Officer
                                   August ______ , 2003