alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELVIS JHUNE QUEROL TUBON,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71181

Agency No. A075-118-892

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 21, 2014** 

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Elvis Jhune Querol Tubon, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding

of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

JAN 23 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on the omission of Tubon’s political activities from his asylum application

and written statement. See Kin v. Holder, 595 F.3d 1050, 1057 (9th Cir. 2010)

(significant omissions from asylum applications can be substantial evidence in

support of an adverse credibility determination). Tubon’s explanations for the

omission do not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245

(9th Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony, Tubon’s asylum and

withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156

(9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT. See

Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008) (denying CAT relief

because petitioner failed to demonstrate that “more likely than not, she will be

tortured at the instigation of, or with the acquiescence of the Philippine

government”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-71181
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2314 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2314

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1993

 Mr. Hastert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,4,4'-TRICHLOROCARBANILIDE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  3,4,4'- Trichloro- carbanilide (provided for in                             No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        subheading 2924.21.30)..................................  Free                                                31/94           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 applies with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been no duty or a lower duty 
if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or 
withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
withdrawal had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
Amend. No. 1 to Amend. & Restated Declar. of Trust and Trust Agrmt. / Registrant



 Exhibit 4.1.1 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 DECLARATION OF TRUST AND TRUST AGREEMENT 
 OF 
 DB COMMODITY INDEX TRACKING FUND

  
 This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No.1”)
to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005 (the “Declaration of Trust”) of DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the “Fund”) by and among DB Commodity Services LLC
(the “Managing Owner”), Wilmington Trust Company and the Unitholders, from time-to-time thereunder. 
  
 WHEREAS, the Managing Owner has deemed it advisable for the Fund to amend and replace the definition of “Index Commodities” as defined in
the Declaration of Trust; 
  
 WHEREAS, the Managing Owner
wishes to amend the Declaration of Trust pursuant to Section 11.1(b)(iii) thereof to give effect to the adoption of a new definition of “Index Commodities”. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of all of which are hereby acknowledged, the Declaration of Trust is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The definition of “Index Commodities” shall be amended and replaced in its entirety as follows: 

  
 “‘Index Commodities’ means the underlying
Commodities which comprise the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Excess ReturnTM from time to time, as described in the Prospectus.” 
  

	 	2.	This Amendment No. 1 to the Declaration of Trust shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware. 

  
 Remainder of page left blank intentionally. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as
of the 1st day of June, 2006. 
  

					
	DB COMMODITY SERVICES LLC, as
Managing Owner
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kevin Rich
	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Kevin Rich

	 	 	 Title:
	 	Director and
Chief Executive Officer
		
	By:	 	/s/ Noam Berk
	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Noam Berk

	 	 	 Title:
	 	 Director and Treasurer



  

					
	Acknowledged:
	WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee
of the Fund
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joseph B. Feil

	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Joseph B. Feil

	 	 	 Title:
	 	 Assistant Vice President


  

 2
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-87013, 333-104321 and 333-111751 of The Sports Authority Inc.
(formerly Gart Sports Company) on Form S-8 and No. 333-87410 on Form S-3 of The Sports Authority Inc. (formerly Gart Sports Company) of
our reports dated April 13, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Sports Authority Inc. (formerly Gart Sports Company) and management's report of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Sports Authority Inc. (formerly Gart Sports Company) for the
year ended January 29, 2005.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

Denver,
Colorado
April 13, 2005

---



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-4610.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Meghan Skelton, Appellate Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Justin S. Herring, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Romero was convicted following a jury trial of illegal reentry of an aggravated felon, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326, 1101(A)(43) (2012) (Count One), and possession of a firearm and of ammunition by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012) (Counts Two and Three). Romero appeals the 180-month sentence imposed for his illegal reentry conviction, asserting that the district court erred in failing to adequately state its reasons for the above-Guidelines sentence. We affirm.

We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 46, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The error asserted by Romero, failing to adequately explain the sentence imposed, would constitute a significant procedural error. *Id.; United States v. Carter,*564 F.3d 325, 328 (4th Cir.2009). Such an explanation is required “to allow for meaningful appellate review and to promote the perception of fair sentencing.” *Gall,*552 U.S. at 50, 128 S.Ct. 586.

Here, we conclude that the district court adequately explained its variance sentence. Explicitly referencing the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the court provided a detailed rationale for its sentence. The court stated that the 180-month sentence was warranted in light of Romero’s history of violence and leadership role in a gang. The court also noted the extremely seriously nature of the offense and the need for adequate deterrence to Romero *271and similarly-situated individuals. Finally, the court explained the need to protect the public from Romero, who has demonstrated “extraordinarily violent behavior,” has expressed no desire to disaffiliate from the gang, and became a gang leader at a relatively young age.

Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not commit the procedural sentencing error asserted by Romero. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2139 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2139

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                                Received

           September 21 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 44, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for 
      the National Historical Publications and Records Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2504(f) of 
title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking ``(f)(1)'' and all 
that follows through the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(f)(1) There are authorized to be appropriated to the National 
Historical Publications and Records Commission such amounts as may be 
necessary to carry out this chapter for each of fiscal years 1994, 
1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2337

To amend the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 to direct the

Secretary of Transportation to consider, in determining whether to approve or disapprove a project grant application submitted by an airport,

whether the policy-making board of the airport includes at least 2 representatives of each State which is located within 5 miles of the airport.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1993

Mr. MANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982

to direct the Secretary of Transportation to consider,

in determining whether to approve or disapprove a

project grant application submitted by an airport, whether the policy-making board of the airport includes at

least 2 representatives of each State which is located

within 5 miles of the airport.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Airport Board Commu5 nity Representation Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2337 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMMUNITY REPRESENTATION ON AIRPORT

2 BOARDS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 509(b) of the Airport and

4 Airway Improvement Act of 1982 (49 U.S.C. App.

5 2208(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following

6 new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(10) In determining whether to approve or dis8 approve a project grant application for a project to

9 be located at a public-use airport, the Secretary shall

10 take into consideration whether the voting members

11 of the board possessing policy-making authority for

12 the airport include at least 2 representatives of each

13 State which is located within 5 miles of the

14 airport.’’.

15 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub16 section (a) shall apply to fiscal years beginning after the

17 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**Exhibit        32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT **

|   | (1) |   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | The                  information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                  issuer                  for the fiscal quarter then ended. |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                                                                       |                                                        |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | MEGA                GROUP, INC.                                            |
|                       |                                                                  |                                                   |
| Date:              May 15, 2007 | By:                                                              | /s/    JOHN              H. BROWN  |
|                            | **John                H. Brown****Chief                Executive Officer** |

|                                   |                                                                        |                                                         |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May                15, 2007 | By:                                                               | /s/    JOYCE              L. BROWN  |
|                                   | **Joyce                L. Brown****Chief                Financial Officer** |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Bankruptcy Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: March 15-16, 2001.

TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hotel Inter-Continental, 444 St. Charles Avenue, New 
Orleans, Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: February 8, 2001.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 01-3704 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED M ICHAEL S. LANCE , A ppellant ,
v. Case No

. 5D 22 -2 874 LT Cas e No s

. 2014 -C F -5 04 -B

2014- CF

- 946- A S TATE OF FLORIDA , A ppellee

.

_

_______________________________/ D ecision filed March 7 , 2023 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County , William S. Orth , Judge. Michael S. Lance, Raiford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

JAY , HARRIS and SOUD , JJ. , conc ur.
**Exhibit 32****Certification of Periodic Financial****Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, William R. Jackson, Rockford’s President, and Richard G. Vasek, Rockford’s Chief FinancialOfficer, each certifies with respect to Rockford Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2007, that: **•** the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  **•** information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, Rockford’sfinancial condition and results of operations.                                                       /s/ William R. Jackson   William R. Jackson   President   Dated: July 31, 2007                                                     /s/ Richard G. Vasek   Richard G. Vasek   Chief Financial Officer   Dated: July 31, 2007
Mandatory Training for FRTIB Employees (FY2024)

Training Topic &

Time Commitment

Mode of Training Frequency Training Point of 

Contact

Ethics

-1 hour

• Instructor-led training - will be announced during the year Required Annually John Gniadek (OGC)

Lee Jones (OGC)

Security Awareness, Training and 

Education (Computer Security)

-1 hour

• Annual awareness training for all employees is staggered 

throughout the year and is due a year after each employee’s last 

completion

• Individual employees receive an email typically a month in advance 

of when training is due

Required Annually Awareness@tsp.gov

Douglas Kandl (OTS)

Tracy DiMaio (OTS)

Annual Privacy Awareness Training

-1 hour

• Online OASIS course Required Annually Peter Robbins (OGC)

Records Management Training

-1 hour

• Online OASIS course Required Annually Diana Avery (MOD)

CUI

-30 minutes

• Online OASIS course Required Every 

Other Year

Diana Avery (MOD)

Diversity & Inclusion Training

-30 minutes

• Online OASIS course Required Annually Donald Sapp (EEO)

Emergency & Disaster Preparedness

-30 minutes

• Online OASIS course Required Every 

Other Year

Joel Mitchell (MOD)

Human Trafficking Awareness

-30 minutes

• Online OASIS course Required Annually Derk Sloane (WDA)

WDA Hosted Training Workshop

-4 Hours

• Training Workshops offered quarterly (In-person or Virtual)

• Attendance for 1 workshop is required

Required Annually Andrew Kennedy 

(WDA)

*Total Time Commitment for FY24 for current employees = 10 hours
8813 Partnership Withholding Tax Payment Voucher (Section 1446) Form

 See separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813. OMB No. 1545-1119

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813. Cat. No. 10681H Form 8813 (Rev. 2-2001)

For calendar year , or tax year beginning , 20 , and ending , 20

2 Amount of this payment

$

Partnership’s U.S. employer identification

number

1

Mail this voucher with a check

or money order payable to the

“United States Treasury.” Write

the partnership’s employer

identification number, tax year,

and “Form 8813” on the check

or money order.

3 PARTNERSHIP’S name, address, (number, street, and room or suite no.), city, state, and ZIP code. If a P.O.

box or foreign address, see page 5 of the instructions.

(Rev. February 2001)

 Do not staple or attach this

voucher to your payment.

 Do not send cash.
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0289

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JAMES MICHAEL WEBB, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellees’ motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including November 17, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 11 2020

09/11/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0289
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**JOY JACOBS,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 112 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 9th day of September, 2016, the Application fo r Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is** DENIED

**.**
(function (Drupal, $, once) {
    Drupal.behaviors.lookingForSelect = {
      attach: function (context, settings) {
        $(once('lookingforselector', '#looking-for-options', context)).change(function() {
            const urlString = this.value;
            if (urlString !== undefined) {
                var patern = /^https?:\/\//i;
                if (patern.test(urlString)) {
                    var url = new URL(urlString);
                    var hostname = url.hostname;
                    var hostArray = hostname.split('.');
                    var urlEnd = hostArray.slice(-1);
                    if ((urlEnd != 'gov') && (urlEnd != 'mil')) {
                        if (confirm($('.external-link-popup-block .field-contents').text())) {    
                            location.href = urlString;
                            return true;
                        } else {
                            return false;
                        }
                    }
                }
                location.href = urlString;
            }
        });
      }
    };
  })(Drupal, jQuery, once);