alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30,
1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           9,541
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,772
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    258,671
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        922,956
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,263,352
<DEPOSITS>                                     983,717
<SHORT-TERM>                                    75,807
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,779
<LONG-TERM>                                    111,966
<COMMON>                                        26,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,263,352
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,549
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,842
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,390
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,400
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,990
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       67
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 136
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,625
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,625
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.62
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,994
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 7,551
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,209
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,987
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      102
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,952
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,680
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,272
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
#### Bridget L. Kenley, appellee, v. Beverly J. Neth, director, State of Nebraska, Department of Motor Vehicles, appellant. Marc F. Shiels, appellee, v. State of Nebraska, Department of Motor Vehicles, appellant.

716 N.W.2d 44

Filed June 9, 2006.

Nos. S-04-1186, S-05-230.

Jon Bruning, Attorney General, Laura L. Neesen, and Milissa Johnson-Wiles for appellant.

Joseph H. Murray, P.C., L.L.O., of Germer, Murray & Johnson, for appellee Kenley.

No appearance for appellee Shiels.

*684Hendry, C.J., Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, and Miller-Lerman, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This matter is before the court on the motion for rehearing of appellee, Bridget L. Kenley, regarding our opinion reported at *Kenley v. Neth, ante*p. 402, 712 N.W.2d 251 (2006). We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows:

The second to last paragraph of that opinion, *id.*at 415, 712 N.W.2d at 263, is withdrawn and the following substituted:

> With respect to Kenley, in her appeal to the district court, she assigned that there was no competent evidence to support the revocation of her driver’s license. Due to its other holdings, the district court did not reach this issue. We remand the cause to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion with directions to determine whether there was competent evidence to support the revocation of Kenley’s driver’s license.

In accordance with the above, we also withdraw the directive language with respect to case No. S-04-1186, *id.*at 416, 712 N.W.2d at 264, and substitute the following:

> Cause in No. S-04-1186 remanded for further proceedings.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.
FSA Erosion Prediction Tools

Transitioning from RUSLE/WEQ to RUSLE2/WEPS

Frequently Asked Questions October 2022

What is changing? 

For Fiscal Year 2023 signups of the 

Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), 

USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) will 

use updated models to estimate potential 

soil erosion by wind and water, which is 

used to rank CRP offers from agricultural 

producers and landowners. The updated 

models are more site specific, align with 

those of USDA’s Natural Resources 

Conservation Service (NRCS), and 

provide a more accurate estimate on 

natural resource benefits, improving the 

scientific accuracy of CRP. 

What is RUSLE2/WEPS? 

The new models, Revised Universal 

Soil Loss Equation version 2, or better 

known as RUSLE2, and Wind Erosion 

Prediction System (WEPS), replaced 

RUSLE and WEQ for CRP ranking and 

eligibility purposes. RUSLE2 is a widely 

used process-based model that estimates 

rates of soil erosion caused by rainfall and 

associated surface runoff. RUSLE2 uses 

climate data from 1960-1990. RUSLE2 

estimates soil erosion using average 

rainfall and expands on the hybrid model 

structure and mathematical integration 

that was used previously by RUSLE. 

Development of WEPS began in the 

mid-2000s with input from multiple 

Federal agencies. NRCS adopted WEPS 

in 2010 as their official wind erosion tool. 

WEPS uses climate data from 1974-

2013. WEPS is a process-based model 

that simulates the daily time step effect 

of precipitation, wind, soil properties, and 

farming operations on wind erosion. 

Will estimated erosion rates 

increase? 

Because of their greater level of 

sophistication, RUSLE2 and WEPS may 

generate noticeably different erosion 

results than RUSLE and WEQ. Factors 

include improved climate data and 

treatment of soils with high sand content. 

Differences will vary by region. Generally, 

the new models suggest a tendency 

toward lower potential for water erosion 

and higher potential for wind erosion. 

How will policies change? 

FSA will use the new tools for the 

General Signup, Continuous Signup, and 

Conservation Reserve Enhancement 

Program (CREP). For the General 

Signup, the new models will be used 

for Environmental Benefits Index (EBI) 

factors for N2c, N3, and N5a, which 

focus on water quality, erosion, and 

air quality. For the Continuous Signup, 

the new models will be used for Highly 

Erodible Land Initiative (HELI). 

For more information

Producers and partners can learn more 

by contacting the FSA at their local USDA 

Service Center.

fsa.usda.gov/

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9856-9857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Meeting; Correction

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following correction.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services, Center for 
Disease Control and Prevention published a

[[Page 9857]]

document in the Federal Register of January 29, 2001, concerning the 
Safety and Occupational Health Study Section will review, discuss, and 
evaluate grant application(s) received in response to the Institute's 
standard grants review and funding cycles pertaining to research issues 
in occupational safety and health and allied areas.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 29, 2001, (Volume 66, Number 19) 
[Notices] Page 8115--``Matters to be Discussed'' should read: The 
meeting will convene in open session from 8:30-9:30 a.m. on February 
15, 2001, to address matters related to the conduct of Study Section 
business. The remainder of the meeting will proceed in closed session. 
The purpose of the closed sessions is for the Safety and Occupational 
Health Study Section to consider safety and occupational health related 
grant applications. These portions of the meeting will be closed to the 
public in accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) 
and (6) title 5 U.S.C., and the Deputy Director for Program Management, 
CDC, pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:   
    Charles N. Rafferty, Ph.D., NIOSH Scientific Review Administrator, 
Bethesda, Maryland. Telephone (301) 435-3562, E-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f58794939390878196b5968687db9b9c9ddb929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e0c1f18181b0c0a1d3e1d0d0c5010171650191108">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 2, 2001.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 01-3485 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4370]



[[Page 11188]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 72-10]


Notice of Issuance of Amendment to Materials License SNM-2506; 
Nuclear Management Company, LLC; Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel 
Storage Installation

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) has 
issued Amendment 5 to Materials License SNM-2506 held by the Nuclear 
Management Company, LLC (NMC) for the receipt, possession, transfer, 
and storage of spent fuel at the Prairie Island Independent Spent Fuel 
Storage Installation (ISFSI), located in Goodhue County, Minnesota. The 
amendment is effective as of the date of issuance.
    By application dated August 31, 1999, as supplemented November 8, 
1999; and March 13, April 6, and October 16, 2000, NMC requested to 
amend its ISFSI license to specifically permit the storage of burnable 
poison rod assemblies (BPRAs) and thimble plug devices (TPDs) within 
the TN-40 casks used at the Prairie Island ISFSI. This amendment 
complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act 
of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and 
regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required 
by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter 
I, which are set forth in the license amendment.
    In accordance with 10 CFR 72.46(b)(2), a determination has been 
made that the amendment does not present a genuine issue as to whether 
public health and safety will be significantly affected. Therefore, the 
publication of a notice of proposed action and an opportunity for 
hearing or a notice of hearing is not warranted. Notice is hereby given 
of the right of interested persons to request a hearing on whether the 
action should be rescinded or modified.
    Also in connection with this action, the Commission prepared an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact 
(FONSI). The EA and FONSI were published in the Federal Register on 
January, 29, 2001 (66 FR 8123).
    In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's ``Rules of Practice,'' 
a copy of the EA and FONSI are available electronically for public 
inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly 
Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). 
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of February 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
E. William Brach,
Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety 
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 01-4370 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2561

_____________________________

JONATHAN MATHIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

February 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jonathan Mathis, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
// Custom scripts file for facets

(function (Drupal, $, once) {
  'use strict';
  Drupal.behaviors.facetsSlide = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      // Facets checked
      function checkFacet() {
        var anyChecked = false;
        // close all by default
        $('.layout-sidebar-first .facet-group').find('nav').hide();
        $('.layout-sidebar-first .facet-group').find('.layout-sidebar-first .facet-group__heading').removeClass('is-active');

        $('.facets-checkbox').each(function () {
          if ( $(this).is( ":checked" ) ) {
            $(this).parents('.facet-group').find('nav').show();
            $(this).parents('.facet-group').find('.facet-group__heading').addClass('is-active');
            anyChecked = true;
          }
          //When hierarchy is enabled
          //Use jquery to find the parent checkbox of the checkbox that was clicked
          //The used javascript to uncheck it.
          $(this).click(function () {
            var checkboxId = $(this).closest('.facet-item--expanded').find('input:checkbox:first').attr('id');
            document.getElementById(checkboxId).checked = false;

          });
        });

        // Expand and show Programs
        $('#block-fnscontactrelatedprograms .facet-group__heading').addClass('is-active');
        $('#block-fnscontactrelatedprograms').find('nav').show();
        // Move WIC checkbox section to top
        $('#block-fnscontactrelatedprograms li.facet-item').each(function () {
          var str = $(this).find('.facet-item__value').text();
          if (str.indexOf('(WIC)') >= 0) {
            $(this).prependTo('#block-fnscontactrelatedprograms .facets-widget-checkbox ul');
            $(this).show();
          }
        });
        // Move SNAP checkbox section to top
        $('#block-fnscontactrelatedprograms li.facet-item').each(function () {
          var str = $(this).find('.facet-item__value').text();
          if (str.indexOf('(SNAP)') >= 0) {
            $(this).prependTo('#block-fnscontactrelatedprograms .facets-widget-checkbox ul');
            $(this).show();
          }
        });
      }
      $(once('click-toggle-facet', '.js-toggle-facet', context)).click(function (e) {
        $(this).toggleClass('is-active');
        var nav = $(this).parents('.facet-group').find('nav');
        nav.slideToggle();
      });

      $(once('key-toggle-facet', '.js-toggle-facet', context)).on('keypress', function (e) {
        $(this).toggleClass('is-active');
        var nav = $(this).parents('.facet-group').find('nav');
        nav.slideToggle();
      });

      $(once('searchviewreset', 'button.search-view-reset', context)).click(function () {
          window.location.href = window.location.pathname;
      });

      $(window).on('load', function (event) {
        checkFacet();
      });
    }
  }
}(Drupal, jQuery, once));
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William J. Eckert, IV, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q report of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable
Contract Real Property Account;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)    Designed  such  disclosure   controls  and  procedures,   or  caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting: and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All  significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses  in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting,


Date: August 14, 2003


/s/ William J. Eckert, IV
-------------------------
William J. Eckert, IV
Chief Accounting Officer

                                       28
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-1585 

_____________________________

NEVEL THERON THOMPSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

June 10, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey III, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Certification

I, Wang Li Rong, certify that: 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Great China International Holdings, Inc. for the periodended September 30, 2007;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.         The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant's internal control over financial reporting.