alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of the Special 
Emphasis Panel meeting referenced below.

    A Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) is a committee of experts 
selected to conduct scientific reviews of grant applications 
submitted for agency funding that are related to their areas of 
expertise. The committee members are drawn from an agency list of 
experts and are designated to serve for particular individual 
meetings rather than for extended fixed terms of service.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below 
will be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C., 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications are to be reviewed and discussed at 
this meeting. These discussions are likely to include personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
This information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the 
above-cited statutes.
    1. Name of SEP: Health Research Dissemination & Implementation.
    Date: March 5, 2001 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and closed 
for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: 6010 Building, 4th Floor, Conference Room D, Rockville, 
Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members or 
minutes of this meeting should contact Ms. Jenny Griffith, Committee 
Management Officer, Office of Research Review, Education and Policy, 
AHRQ, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Suite 400, Rockville, Maryland 
20852, Telephone (301) 594-1847.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: February 13, 2001.
John M. Eisenberg,
Director.
[FR Doc. 01-4148 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11010-11011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EG01-127-000]


PPL Martins Creek, LLC; Errata Notice; Notice of Application for 
Commission Redetermination of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

February 14, 2001.
    Take notice that the above-referenced notice (66 FR 10278, February 
14, 2001)

[[Page 11011]]

was inadvertently issued under Docket No. EG01-41-000. Since then, it 
has been reassigned a new docket number as captioned above.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4193 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

PLUMA, INC.


COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND 1998 (UNAUDITED)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                                                                              1999                    1998

<S>                                                                                      <C>                       <C>
INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS -
     Net income (loss) available to common shareholders                                  $(10,024,824)             $ (881,683)
                                                                                         -------------             -----------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
     Common shares outstanding                                                               8,109,152               8,109,152
     Assumed exercise of stock options                                                    
                                                                                         -------------             -----------

         Total                                                                               8,109,152               8,109,152
                                                                                         =============             ===========

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE AND COMMON
     EQUIVALENT - Basic and diluted                                                         $   (1.24)              $    (.11)
                                                                                         =============             ===========

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Intent To Issue a Temporary of Concession Contract for 
Gas Service at Yosemite National Park

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Park Service Concessions Management 
Improvement Act of 1998, notice is hereby given that the National Park 
Service intends to issue a temporary concession contract authorizing 
continued operation of a gas service station adjacent to the west 
entrance of Yosemite National Park. The operation is located on land 
administered by the park in the community of El Portal. The temporary 
concession contract will be for a term of not more than three years. 
This short-term concession contract is necessary to avoid interruption 
of public services while the National Park Service finalizes the 
Yosemite Valley Plan. This short-term contract will be for a three-year 
period beginning January 1, 2001. This notice is in pursuant to 36 CFR 
part 51, section 51.24(a).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The current concession contract at Yosemite 
National Park will expire on December 31, 2000. The year round 
operation is the primary source for visitors to obtain gas and have 
minor auto repairs performed. The Yosemite Valley Plan is near 
completion and addresses future service station operations. Underground 
storage tanks at the existing El Portal Site must be replaced to comply 
with all state and federal requirements; this is in the process of 
being accomplished. The short-term concession contact will allow for 
this action to take place without a long-term delay in service to the 
public. In addition, this period of time is necessary to allow for 
completion of the Prospectus, that will incorporate the planning 
requirements for commercial development of the El Portal Administrative 
Site currently being considered in the Yosemite Valley Plan.
    Information about this notice can be sought from: National Park 
Service, Chief, Concession Program Management Office, Pacific West 
Region, Attn: Mr. Tony Sisto, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 600, San 
Francisco, California 94107-1372, or call (415) 427-1366.

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
Sondra Humphries,
(Acting) Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 01-4078 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Global Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), We, Anastasios N. Kyriakides, Chairman of the Board and Chief
      Executive Officer, and Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.




Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to our knowledge:




a)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and b) The information contained in this
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.


***/s/ Anastasios
        N. Kyriakides,***
 ***Anastasios
        N. Kyriakides***
 ***Chairman
        of the Board and Chief Executive Officer***
  ***/s/**Bill
        Rodriguez***
 ***Bill
        Rodriguez***
 ***Chief
        Financial Officer***
  ***August
        27, 2007***
   **15**
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Travon Walker, Appellant

No. 06-19-00080-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 18-F-0897-005). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Travon Walker, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 16, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00266-CR

IN RE Juan MORENO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 8, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On April 25, 2013, Relator Juan Moreno filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to 

compel the court reporter in Bexar County, Texas to produce a copy of the record in the case. 

However, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. By statute, this court 

has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the 

court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). We conclude the writ is not necessary to 

enforce our jurisdiction. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for 

lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009CR8686D, styled State of Texas v. Juan Moreno, pending in the 

379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), I, James T. Sartain, President and Chief Executive Officerof FirstCity Financial Corporation (“registrant”), certify, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)                theQuarterly Report of the registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2008 (“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| Date: August 11,  2008 | /s/ James T. Sartain                    |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        | James T. Sartain                        |
|                        | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK>    0000828941 
<NAME> ESELCO, INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   48,360,980
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       8,449,498
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     3,595,898
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,406,376
<COMMON>                                        15,932
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   19,256,710
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            835,134
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              19,808,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        12,172,179
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           4,623,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                    5,128,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                3,194,611
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              15,480,483
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               60,406,376
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    9,431,913
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           210,672
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   8,273,591
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   8,484,263
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        947,650
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (24,937)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,002,213
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       508,025
<NET-INCOME>                                   494,188
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  494,188
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       446,090
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      673,620
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       2,115,435
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6175

MICHAEL BREYAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLASSIFICATION EMPLOYEES,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00062-BHH)

Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 26, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Breyan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Breyan seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified 

by the district court may be remedied by filing an amended complaint, we conclude that the 

order Breyan seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral 

order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); 

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district 

court with instructions to allow Breyan to amend his complaint. Goode, 807 F.3d at 630. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Opinion issued August 14, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00483-CR

———————————

KEITH EDWARD GRIMMETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1369980

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Keith Edward Grimmett, attempts to appeal his March 17, 

2014 conviction for murder. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2(a), a 
2

notice of appeal was due on or before April 16, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). 

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 5, 2014.

1

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is 

essential to vest this court with jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 

210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). The court of criminal appeals has expressly held that 

without a timely filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time we cannot

exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

Because the notice of appeal in this case was untimely, we have no basis for 

jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f); Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 

S.W.2d at 523. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1 Appellant included an unsworn declaration with his notice of appeal, which 

reflects that it was executed on May 23, 2014. Nevertheless, even if the notice of 

appeal was handed to prison officials, and therefore would be considered filed, on 

May 23, 2014, the notice was untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b), 26.2(a); 

Campbell v. State, 320 S.W.3d 338, 342 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  June 27, 2003                                /s/ Eric H. Paulson
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Eric H. Paulson
                                                    Chairman of the Board,
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date:  June 27, 2003                                /s/ James Gilbertson
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    James Gilbertson
                                                    Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30686 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TERRY RATHEL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-50023-3

- - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Terry Rathel has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 396 U.S. 738 (1976). Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-14-00014- CV In re Elem ent Enterprises, LLC

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The petiti o n fo r writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a) . The rela tor’s motion to stay

the under ly ing pr ocee dings is dismissed.

____________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose Filed: January

16, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems (1190).                    

*Date and Time:*                         March 25, 2001; 1 p.m. to 6 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         Oakland Marriott City Center, 1001 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94067 (510) 451-4000.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Farley Fisher, Program Director, Division of Chemical & Transport Systems, Room 525, (703) 292-8371.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate nominations for the FY 2001 Research Equipment Panel of proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 14, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-4166 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M