alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Theodore Venners, state and attest that:



|(1) | I am the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KFx Inc. (the issuer).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Accompanying this certification is the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, a periodic report (the periodic report) filed by the issuer with
the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), which contains financial statements.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented
therein.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|/s/ THEODORE VENNERS                                                      
|                                                                          
|Theodore Venners Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 15, 2004



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KFx Inc. and will be retained by KFx Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Amendment No. 2 to Advisory Agreement



 Exhibit 10.14 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 ADVISORY AGREEMENT 
 This amendment no. 2 to that certain Advisory Agreement dated as of November 8,
2005 (the “Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as
of August 8, 2006 (the “Amendment”). This Amendment supersedes and replaces Amendment No. 1 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of July 18, 2006. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth
in the Advisory Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to advance the Company a portion of
the Operating Expenses that the Company has incurred through the date hereof and agreed to be repaid this advance only upon the terms set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 9 of the Advisory Agreement to the contrary, the Advisor hereby agrees to advance funds (the
“Advance”) to the Company equal to the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company for the period ending October 31, 2006 less the amount of the Company’s funds from operations (as defined by NAREIT) from
January 1, 2006 through October 31, 2006, provided that in no event will the amount of the Advance be more than the cumulative amount of distributions declared by the Company for the period ending October 31, 2006. Advisor further
agrees that the Company will only be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the Advance if and to the extent that the Company’s cumulative funds from operations for the period commencing January 1, 2006 through the date of any such
reimbursement exceed the lesser of (i) the cumulative amount of any distributions declared and payable to the Company’s Stockholders as of the date of such reimbursement or (ii) an amount that is equal to a 7.0% cumulative,
non-compounded, annual return on Invested Capital for the Company’s Stockholders for the period from July 18, 2006 through the date of such reimbursement. Advisor understands and agrees that no interest shall accrue on the Advance being
made under this Amendment. 
 Signature page follows. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above
written. 
  

											
	KBS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.

		 		 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
	
	KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
			
		 	By:	 	Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner
						
		 		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.

		 		 		 		 		 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2470

To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to permit

the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to reduce the maximum monthly rents in effect for certain projects receiving assistance

under such section to eliminate material differences in the rents charged

for similar assisted and unassisted units in the same area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1993

Mr. THOMAS of California (for himself and Mr. DOOLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance

and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of

1937 to permit the Secretary of Housing and Urban

Development to reduce the maximum monthly rents in

effect for certain projects receiving assistance under such

section to eliminate material differences in the rents

charged for similar assisted and unassisted units in the

same area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 8(c)(2)(C) of the United States Housing Act

4 of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(c)(2)(C)) is amended by strik-
2

•HR 2470 IH

1 ing ‘‘The Secretary may not reduce’’ and all that follows

2 through ‘‘periodic payments of the owner.’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deidra Trena COATS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-14906

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 13, 2010.

William Jordan Brower, Brower Law Office, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Ramona C. Albin, U.S. Attorney’s Office Nd/Al, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William J. Brower, appointed counsel for Deidra Trena Coats, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals, that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Coats’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,897
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,964
<PP&E>                                         204,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,060
<BONDS>                                        177,371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         29
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,396
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,546
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,944)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (171)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.48)


</TABLE>
EX-10.14 FORM OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT R. SALOMON



 








Exhibit 10.14



Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2006, by and between

Robert Salomon and Ashton Woods USA, L.L.C.



     By memorandum dated April 30, 2006, our Board of Directors confirmed to Robert Salomon, our Chief
Financial Officer, his annual salary, bonus calculation and certain severance payments if Mr.
Salomon is terminated following a sale of the Company resulting in a
change of control of our
equity. On August 9, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Salomon, which
addresses the provisions set forth in the memorandum in more detail. The agreement is for a term
of five years ending August 2011, subject to automatic renewal for additional one-year terms absent
notice of termination from either party. The employment agreement provides for an annual based
salary of $200,000 and an annual bonus in an amount equal to 0.75% of our annual net income,
calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and reflected in our annual
audited financial statements, as adjusted to exclude initial start-up losses of any new division
during the first two years of operation, imputed interest on equity, bonuses paid at the
operational level and specific projects as agreed from time to
time.




     The Agreement also provides for the following payments to Mr. Salomon upon termination of his
employment:





	 	•	 	Upon termination without cause, including upon expiration of the agreement, Mr. Salomon
will be entitled to a severance payment equal to (a) one year of base salary and (b) a
prorated amount of the bonus payable for the then current year through the date of
termination.
	 
	 	•	 	Upon termination for any reason following the sale of the Company, irrespective of form,
Mr. Salomon will be entitled to a severance payment equal to the greater of (a) the bonus
paid pursuant to the employment agreement for the most recently completed fiscal year and
(b) $500,000.





     The agreement also provides for termination with cause and upon death or disability, in which case
Mr. Salomon will receive any accrued salary to the date of termination and any other benefits to
which he is entitled under then existing benefit plans.
#### John G. BAUMGARTEN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent.

No. 2014-3139.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 1, 2014.

John G. Baumgarten, FPO, AP, pro se.

Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of this recently docketed petition for review, it appears that John G. Baumgarten’s petition was not timely filed.

On February 28, 2014, the Merit Systems Protection Board dismissed as untimely (without a showing of good cause) Baumgarten’s petition for review of an ini*965tial decision that had dismissed his appeal of his reduction in grade/pay. The court received his petition for review on May 12, 2014, which was 73 days after the Board issued its final order.

The time for filing a petition for review from a Board decision or order is governed by 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1), which provides in relevant part that “[notwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days after the Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the Board.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A). This filing period is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” *Monzo v. Dep’t of Transp.,*735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed.Cir.1984).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Baumgarten is directed to show cause, within 45 days of the date of filing of this order, why this petition should not be dismissed as untimely. The Department of the Army may also respond within that time.

(2) The briefing schedule is stayed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gart Sports Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended November 2, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas T. Hendrickson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/THOMAS T. HENDRICKSONThomas T. Hendrickson
Chief Financial Officer
April 3, 2003 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Chris T. Sharng, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Natural Health Trends Corp.; and2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport.        Date: April 29, 2008 /s/ Chris T. Sharng   Chris T. Sharng   President(Principal Executive Officer)
[No. 35048-3-II.

Division Two.

August 21, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Nicholas Pines, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 06-1-00449-1, Anna M. Laurie, J., entered June 9, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Van Deren, A.C.J., and Penoyar, J.
941 A.2d 1262

#### Lisa HUNT, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. BAYER CORPORATION and Bayer AG, and Crompton Corporation and Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc., and BASF AG, Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 7, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2008, the Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief Invoking this Honorable Court’s King’s Bench Powers and Requesting a Stay of Proceedings and the Application for Leave to File a Response to the Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s King’s Bench Petition are DISMISSED AS MOOT due to the discontinuance of the action filed at No. 1038 February Term 2005 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.
# Content start

## FAIR Act

The “Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998” (FAIR Act) directs Federal agencies to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) an inventory of all their commercial activities that are performed by Federal employees. OMB reviews each agency’s Commercial Activities Inventory and consults with the agency regarding its content. Upon the completion of this review and consultation, the agency is required to transmit a copy of the inventory to Congress and make it available to the public on the Agency website. The specific data to be posted is described in section 2(c) of the FAIR Act.

The required information is below.

**Most recent:**FAIR Act Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 [XLS]

### older FAIR Act reports, descending by year

#### Previous FAIR Act Reports 

FAIR Act Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 [XLS]

FAIR Act Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 [XLS]

FAIR Act Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 [XLS]
Schedule 1.1  Navion Subsidiaries
                                                                to the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement
                                                                      between Statoil ASA and Statpet AS
                                                                                     and Norsk Teekay AS
                                                                                  dated 15 December 2002

The expression Navion Subsidiaries shall for the purposes of the Agreement mean the following:

On Signing Date:

The company names appearing as owned directly or indirectly by Navion as at the Signing Date:

Navion Shipping Holding AS
Navion Shipping AS
Navion Shipping Operations AS
Navion Chartering AS (50 %)
Navion Maritime AS
Rasmussen Navion KS
Rasmussen Navion AS
Navion Technology AS
Navion Offshore Loading AS
Navion Caspian Region AS
Caspian Transportation Holding (Cyprus) Ltd.
Navion Inc.

On Closing:

The company names appearing as owned directly or indirectly by Navion as at Closing

Navion Shipping Holding AS
Navion Shipping AS
Navion Shipping Operations AS
Navion Chartering AS (50 %)
Navion Technology AS
Navion Offshore Loading AS
Navion Caspian Region AS
Caspian Transportation Holding (Cyprus) Ltd.
Navion Inc.

As part of the Navion Reorganisation one or more Group Members may become a member of the Statoil
Group during the period between the Signing Date and the date of Closing, from which point in time
such company shall no longer be considered as a Navion Subsidiary.
NO. 07-10-00369-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A JANUARY 26, 2011

LONNIE MOORE, APPELLANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LA W NO. 1 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2010-460,904; HONORABLE LARR Y B. "RUSTY" LADD, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND Appellant Lonnie Moore appeal s from the trial court’s judgment finding her guilty of assault and sentencing her to 365 days of imprisonment. Appellant filed notice of appeal on September 22, 2010. The clerk’s record was received and filed on November 17. The reporter’s record was due on Decem ber 15. By letter of January 3, 2011, this Court advised the reporter that the appellate record was late and directed the reporter to

advise the Court of the status of the appellate record on or before January 13. As of this date, the court reporter has failed to comply with the directive of the Court.2 Accordingly, we abate this appeal a nd remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). On remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to determine the following:

1. Why the reporter has not res ponded to the Court’s directive; 2. Why the reporter’s record has not been filed; 3. When this Court can expect the record to be filed; and

4. Whether an alternative or substitute reporter should or can be appointed to complete the record in a timely manner.

The trial court shall cause any hearings to be transcribed. In addition, the trial

court shall (1) execute findings of fact and conclu sions of law addressing the foregoing issues, (2) cause a supplemental clerk's record to be developed co ntaining its findings of fact and conclusions of law and any orders it may issue relating to this matter, and (3) cause a reporter's record to be developed transcribing the evid ence and arguments presented at the aforementione d hearing, if any. The trial court shall then file the supplemental clerk's record and any reporter's record transcribing the hearing with the

clerk of this court on or bef ore February 25, 2011. Should fu rther time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, same must be requested befor e February 25, 2011.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Order entered December 29 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00898

- CR

JOHN ANTHONY MARGETI S, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 9

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB

- 1251720

- K



### O RDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s December 23, 2014 motion to extend time to file his

amended brief. We ORDER the amended brief received on December 23, 2014 filed as of t he

date of this order.

The State’s brief is due wit hin thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-11-16T21:05:31Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-11-16T21:05:34Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-11-16T21:05:34Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="108532">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-11-16T21:05:31Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OEFXCE OF 
</p>
<p>TmJkrTO~GENERm 
Avsmm. TEXAS </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<p>. </p>
<p></p>
<div class="ocr">Han, I. Peedeckl, Sage 2

|

and when fn the opinion of 6 safarity of «
sioners Court af & coutty ah atties ope

g
t
;

sential to the tion of
‘of either areny ape or Federal. Oorernments, & i
our harety specifically authorized.
atom and for ¢ ntiiiec Aird fer

oh

</div>

</div>
</body></html>