alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.13





 Exhibit 10.13 

 
 



 
 June 23, 2016 
 Joshua
LeMaire 
 Executive Vice President, Marketing & Operations 

Re: Executive Compensation Package 
 Dear Josh: 

The board of directors (the “Board”) of Montrose Environmental Group, Inc (the “Company”) has approved an executive compensation package
for you which is summarized herein. In addition to company benefit plans offered to you from time to time by the Company, you shall be eligible for the following compensation package: 

Base Compensation: $200,000 per year 
 Cash Bonus
Program: The cash bonus program you are eligible for has been separately approved by the Board and all payments thereunder remain subject to Board approval. 

IPO/Change in Control Cash Bonus Amount: $1,000,000 shall be payable to you in cash upon the occurrence of a change in control or effectiveness of an
Initial Public Offering of the Company. A change in control shall be defined as set forth in the Company’s equity incentive plan. 
 Equity
Incentive Award: You will be granted 7,515 new options under the Company’s equity incentive program, which shall be updated upon approval by the Board and requisite shareholders to increase the number of options available for grant. The
options shall vest over a four year period, with 50% vesting at the second anniversary of the vesting start date and the remaining 50% vesting at the fourth anniversary of the vesting start date. The vesting start date shall be the vesting start
date of options you received in 2015. The options shall fully accelerate upon a change in control of the Company (not including an Initial Public Offering) as set forth in the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 2013 Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan. All options previously granted to you in 2015 shall be cancelled. 
 Severance Upon Termination Without Cause Following a Change in Control: If
you are terminated without cause or terminate your employment for good reason within twelve (12) months following a change in control of the Company, you shall be entitled to receive severance in the amount of one year of your then-current base
salary, which may be payable in lump sum or as continued compensation during the 12 month severance period, as determined by the Company. 
 We look forward
to your continued success with Montrose. 
 Regards, 
 /s/
Richard Perlman 
 Richard Perlman 
 Chairman of the Board 

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 
  

			
	 Global Headquarters    

1 Park Plaza
 Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92614
	 	  T: 949.988.3500
  F: 949.988.3514

 info@montrose-env.com

 www.montrose-env.com
rom 8038-G Information Return for Tax-Exempt

(December 1986) Governmental Bond Issues OMB No. 1545-0720
Department of the Treasury > Under Section 149(e) Expires 12-31-89
Internal Revenue Service (Use Form 8038-GC if issue price is under $100,000.)
Reporting Authority Check box if Amended Return »_[_]
1 Issuer's name 2 Issuer's employer identification number
3 Number and street 4 Report number

G198 —
5 City or town, state, and ZIP code 6 Date of issue

Type of Issue (check box(es) that applies)

7 Check box if bonds are tax or other revenue anticipation bonds» [_] Issue Price
8 Check box if bonds are in the form of a lease or installment sale > []

9 ClEducation, © 0
10 LC] Healthandhospital. © 2 0.

uO Transportation

12 CO Public safety .

23 O Environment (irlucng sewage bonds)

wa UO Housing oo oe

15 [2 Utilities

16 [J Other. Describe (see instructions)

GRE Description of Bonds

@ ) © . © 0) @
Stated redemption Weighted Net interest
Maturity date interest rate Issue price price at maturity average maturity Yield cost
17 Final maturity . %
18 Entireissue. . years
xisang Uses of Original Proceeds of Issue (including underwriters’ discount)

19 Proceeds used for accruedinterest . . . . tee ee ee LA
20 Proceeds used for bond issuance costs (including ‘underwriters’ discount) . tee ee ee LO
21° Proceeds used forcreditenhancement. . . . . . . ee eee ey PRE
22 Proceeds allocated to reasonably required reserve or replacement fund

23 Proceeds used to refund priorissues 2. 183
24 _Nonrefunding proceeds of the issue (subtract lines 20, 21, ‘22, and 23 from line 18, column (c)). . | 24

igiag Description of Refunded Bonds (complete this part only for refunding bonds)

25 Enter the remaining weighted average maturity of the bondstoberefunded . . . . . . . . . Rm CaS

26 Enter the last date on which the refunded bondswillbecalled . 2... 1 ee ee
27__ Enter the date(s) the refunded bonds were issued_>
Miscellaneous

28 Enter the amount (if any) of the state volume capallocatedtothisissue . . . .... 1. DP
29 = Arbitrage rebate:
a Check box if the small governmental unit exception to the arbitrage rebate requirement applies .
b Check box if the 6-month temporary investment exception to the arbitrage rebate requirement is expected to soy
c Check box if you expect to earn and rebate arbitrage profits to the U.S. soe ee
30 Enter the amount of the bonds designated by the issuer under section 265(bx3N(B)Ci) re 2
31 Pooled financings:
a Check box if any of the proceeds of this issue are to be used to make loans to other governmental units > 0 and

enter the amount B
b Check box if this issue is a loan made from the proceeds of another tax-exempt issue > CO and enter the name of the
issuer > and the date of the issue >

Under penalties of perjury, | declare that | have examined this return and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,
Please they are true, correct, and complete.

ooo

Sign
Here » Signature of officer Date > Title
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 1 of the Instructions. Form 8038-G (12-86)

U.S. Government Printing Office: 1987—201-993/60165
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2378

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase the national maximum

speed limit on any highway which is located outside an urbanized area

with a population of fifty thousand or more, which is constructed to

interstate standards, and which is not connected to the Interstate System, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. LANCASTER (for himself, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. FINGERHUT, Mr. GEREN,

Mr. MINGE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. SOLOMON, Mrs. VUCANOVICH, and Mr. WILSON) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and

Transportation

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase the

national maximum speed limit on any highway which

is located outside an urbanized area with a population

of fifty thousand or more, which is constructed to interstate standards, and which is not connected to the Interstate System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2378 IH

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT.

2 Section 154(a)(3)(A) of title 23, United States Code,

3 is amended by striking ‘‘and connected to a highway on

4 the Interstate System’’.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY.

6 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Transportation shall

7 conduct a study of the effects on highway safety of in8 creasing under the amendment made by section 1 of this

9 Act the maximum speed limit above fifty-five miles per

10 hour on highways with four lanes or more open to traffic.

11 (b) REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date

12 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor13 tation shall transmit to Congress a report on the results

14 of the study conducted under this section.

Æ
HUGO ARISTIZABAL,

Appellant,

v.

AIRCRAFT SERVICE 

INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND 

GALLAGHER BASSETT 

SERVICES, INC.,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0104

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

W. James Condry, II, Judge.

Date of Accident: July 15, 2011.

Monte R. Shoemaker of Shoemaker & Shoemaker, P.A., Altamonte Springs, and 

Richard W. Ervin, III of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

H. George Kagan of Miller, Kagan, Rodriguez & Silver, P.L., West Palm Beach, for 

Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### DELORES G. SINOTTE ET AL. *v.*CITY OF WATERBURY

*Erskine D. McIntosh,*in support of the petition.

*Justin J. Donnelly,*assistant corporation counsel, in opposition.

Decided July 1, 2010

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 420 (AC 30304), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2301

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on PCMX.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until January 1, 1997, the duty on PCMX.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PCMX.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 4-Chloro-3,5-

dimethylphenol (CAS No.

88–04–0) (provided for in

subheading 2908.10.50) ..... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
2

•HR 2301 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Form 8864

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel Fuels Credit

▶ Attach to your tax return.

▶ Information about Form 8864 and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form8864.

OMB No. 1545-1924

2014

Attachment 

Sequence No. 141

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

Caution. You cannot claim any amounts on Form 8864 that you claimed (or will claim) on Form 720 (Schedule C), Form 

8849, or Form 4136.

Claimant has a certificate from the producer or importer of biodiesel or renewable diesel reported on lines 1 through 6 

below and, if applicable, claimant also has a statement from the reseller. Claimant has no reason to believe that the 

information in the certificate or statement is false. Claimant may need to attach a copy of the certificate and statement. 

See Certification in the instructions.

Type of Fuel

(a) 

Number of Gallons 

Sold or Used

(b) 

Rate

(c) 

Column (a) x Column (b) 

1 Biodiesel (other than agri-biodiesel) . . . . . . . . . 1 

2 Agri-biodiesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 Renewable diesel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 Biodiesel (other than agri-biodiesel) included in a biodiesel 

mixture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5 Agri-biodiesel included in a biodiesel mixture . . . . . . 5

6 Renewable diesel included in a renewable diesel mixture . . 6

7 Qualified agri-biodiesel production . . . . . . . . . 7 

8 Add lines 1 through 7. Include this amount in your income for 2014 (see instructions) . . . . . 8

9 Biodiesel and renewable diesel fuels credit from partnerships, S corporations, cooperatives, 

estates, and trusts (see instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

10 Add lines 8 and 9. Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, go to line 11. Partnerships and 

S corporations, stop here and report this amount on Schedule K. All others, stop here and report 

this amount on Form 3800, Part III, line 1l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

11 Amount allocated to patrons of the cooperative or beneficiaries of the estate or trust (see 

instructions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

12 Cooperatives, estates, and trusts, subtract line 11 from line 10. Report this amount on Form 3800, 

Part III, line 1l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 25778F Form 8864 (2014)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          24,861
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               171,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     74,698
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         888,332
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           897,941
<LOANS>                                      2,739,807
<ALLOWANCE>                                     38,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,041,621
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,707,841
<SHORT-TERM>                                   717,949
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             40,237
<LONG-TERM>                                    372,126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,041,621
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                160,950
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,053
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                42,837
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               211,840
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             100,003
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,008
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           57,832
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,309
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 50,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,585
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,585
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.36
<LOANS-NON>                                     45,674
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,311
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                36,829
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,579
<RECOVERIES>                                       393
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               38,952
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            38,952
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
-. 

. . . . . 

, 

! ,& 

i. 

1 L 

OFFICE OF THE ArCORNEY GENERAL OF .TEXAS 

I. AUSTIN 

. 

. . i 

Q-O.-N 

A--’ 

or on~.the presoription 

ors do this app,parsntlg i. 

ave admitted to me that. the 

~“The Boa??d hae l.nstru&ed me tb m&l thla 

matter to your attwtion, and ask if rruah ~aativity 

on the part of un Ostoopathia physlcl,an is not, 

uhen 3&entloml, culpable, as a purposlvc intent. 

to dcacive? Biridently SOJW of these doctors pro- ~, 

mm that sinoe they get a lloonse to practice 

*.. 

_,. 

. 
Texas State Board of &Mica1 Examiners, page 2 

;. 

. . 

-4 -tid.ic& and surgery in this state, they are also 

'..--a authorized to asmme the .use of the title &I. D., 

. ~Jihiah they ,have not earaed.' 

Ve interpret gctur letter as repuestin(S an 0pLnnion as 

td whether the use, under the airounstancca descrlbed,.of the 

fkbbrev$etion 5X. D. * by a~ osteoptith violates any provision of 

the Civil or GrimLnsl laws of this State. 

. 

.S?ebcter*s Ikm International Dictlonory gives this 

definition of ,the word 'doctor*: 

: 

'AA acadenlo titlo,~ o&mlly tiplyi~g that 

its 

P 

os~essck uas ao well versed in a desartrient~ of 

how edge.as to be qualified to teach; heAceS one 

ok who5 this title has been oonferred by a univtq-> 

“’ 

sitp OT co?.le2e,.or.other properly constituted aut thority.. AmAg the ohief doctoral degrees are) 

f 

I@tOr of Mefiaine (BL D,.), . . .! 

,:. 

.. In the aase of Comonwealth Ve New England College oS 

Wropraatic, 108 ht. B. 895, 221 Hass, 190,~the oouIit said: 

'Ihe word *doctor', .ie a prefix to a person's - 

n&ixe~sQ@.fles~a~ aoadenio distinotloA,foundsd upon 

having reoeiVt?d a dcgmi, aAd 8s OOZIEion~y used, in-. 

&Gates still In the general subject of medioZn8." 

There is.no statute, alvil or orLmiAal,* expressly prohibitIng the use of the abbreviation 'i& II." by a pers~on.u$on 

vhon the de~ee~"%edicinae DOotOr" hati tiot been oonfkrred,. 

'.. 

whether euah conduct ia “culpable” in the.sonsa of SKbjeatQq 

the individual to "censure or blame" ia not a Question of law, 

and we are not authorized aiid ~211 .'otuAdertahe to express8n . 

upon abstraot guegtions of.moralfty or professional 

Very truly pours 

tmnzdb 

diJ 4 

BY 

._..._ - . . . tf; 8. Allen % 

Assistant
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


February 16, 2004

/s/ CHARLES SHEFFIELD
-------------------------------------
Charles Sheffield
President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ E.A. BUCHHOLTZ
-------------------------------------
E.A. Buchholtz
Chief Financial Officer
#### ALABAMA GAS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-14345.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 11, 2014.

W. Scott Laseter, Jennifer A. Simon, Kazmarek Geiger & Laseter, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Fred R. Deleon, Jr., Pritchett Environmental & Property Law, LLC, Rebecca Wright Pritchett, Sirote & Permutt, PC, Michael L. Bell, Haley A. Cox, Light-foot Franklin & White, LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ruth S. Kochenderfer, Frank Winston, Jr., Paul E. Janaskie, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Washington, Dc, John Stephen Johnson, Andrew J. Sinor, Jr., Hand Arendall, LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.

*838Before MARCUS and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and TREADWELL,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Marc T. Treadwell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This case is a state-law case involving a question of coverage under a series of insurance contracts dealing with land, hazardous substances and clean-up costs. In full opinions, the district court ruled by-summary judgment for insurer and against coverage for indemnification and against bad faith damages for the insurer’s refusal to defend. After hearing oral argument and after deliberation, we see no reversible error and affirm the judgment.

Briefly stated, we agree that the occurrences that might trigger coverage in this case happened too early—before 1949—for the proved pertinent policy periods. About bad faith, we agree that, given the circumstances, the amount of time that elapsed before the insurer’s express denial does not equal an earlier constructive denial. And we agree that the question of whether a PRP letter from the EPA triggered a defense obligation was debatable before the Supreme Court of Alabama decided the question in this case. The record will not support bad faith.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
10.1


Metro One
Telecommunications, Inc.

11200 Murray Scholls Place
Beaverton, Oregon 97007


June 1,
2006


James M. Usdan

23 Northumberland

Nashville, TN 37215


Dear Jim:


This letter will confirm our agreement that the
Consulting Agreement, between you and Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”),
dated as of October 4, 2005 (the “Consulting Agreement”), shall be amended as
follows:


1.             You hereby resign as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and your service in that capacity shall no longer be
required under Section 1.2 of the Consulting Agreement.  Your duties going forward during the term of
the Consulting Agreement will consist of rendering consultation, advice and
assistance to the Company in regard to all aspects of its business.


2.             Unless earlier terminated under Section 2.2, your
engagement under the Consulting Agreement shall terminate November 1,
2006.  Section 2.2(e) and (f) providing
for termination on 30 days notice shall no longer be applicable.


3.             Your compensation under Section 3.1 of the Consulting
Agreement shall continue at the current rate of $14,666.67 through September 1,
2006, at which time your
compensation shall be reduced to a rate of $7,083.34 per month through the
termination of the Consulting Agreement.


4.             The Company’s obligation to provide or to reimburse you
for health insurance coverage will terminate on November 1, 2006.


Nothing
in this letter shall affect the continued vesting of the stock options granted
pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Consulting Agreement.  Except as set forth in this letter, the terms
of the Consulting Agreement will remain in full force and effect.


	
  

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  AGREED AND
  ACCEPTED

  	
  METRO ONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ James M.
  Usdan

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Gary E. Henry

  	
   

  
	
  James M. Usdan

  	
   

  	
  Gary E. Henry

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President and CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2171 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2171

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of 
 bonds eligible for financial institution purchase under small issuer 
                               exception.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

Mr. Lewis of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of 
 bonds eligible for financial institution purchase under small issuer 
                               exception.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHANGES IN RULE RELATING TO TAX-EXEMPT BONDS.

    (a) Exception From Pro Rata Allocation of Interest Expense of 
Financial Institutions to Tax-Exempt Interest for Small Issuers 
Increased to $25,000,000.--
            (1) In general.--Subparagraphs (C) and (D) of section 
        265(b)(3) of such Code are each amended by striking 
        ``$10,000,000'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``$25,000,000''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to obligations issued after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```