alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year
ended December 31, 2004 of EarthShell  Corporation (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Simon K. Hodson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my best knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                               /s/ SIMON K. HODSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                 Simon K. Hodson
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                               Date: March 31, 2005

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year
ended December 31, 2004 of EarthShell  Corporation (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, D.
Scott Houston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my best knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                  /s/ D. SCOTT HOUSTON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                   D. Scott Houston
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Date: March 31, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2267 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2267

To amend section 207 of title 18, United States Code, to increase to 5 
years the period during which former Members of Congress may not engage 
                    in certain lobbying activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1993

  Mr. Andrews of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 207 of title 18, United States Code, to increase to 5 
years the period during which former Members of Congress may not engage 
                    in certain lobbying activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 
207(e)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``1 year'' and inserting ``5 years''.

                                 <all>
```
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 19, 2015

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

SELECTS A MANAGER FOR THE C FUND 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) 

announced today that it has selected Blackrock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. as the 

investment manager for its Common Stock Investment Fund (C Fund). The C Fund 

invests in a stock index fund that tracks the performance of the Standard & Poor's 500 

(S&P 500) Index. The earnings consist of dividend income and gains or losses in the 

prices of stocks. As of April 2015, the C Fund held $143.5 billion in assets. The contract 

will be for a one-year term, with four one-year options. 

The C Fund and the FRTIB’s other funds -- the Fixed Income Index Investment Fund, the 

Small Cap Stock Index Investment Fund, and the International Stock Index Investment 

Fund – are currently managed by BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. 

(BlackRock). 

 

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it is

similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private employers. 

As of April 2015, TSP assets totaled approximately $454.0

billion, and retirement savings accounts were being maintained 

for more than 4.7 million TSP participants. Participants include 

Federal civilian employees in all branches of Government, 

employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of the 

uniformed services. Additional information can be found at 

www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)
Exhibit 21**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**1. Equity Marketing Hong Kong, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (“EMHK”) 2. Corinthian Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation 3. Logistix Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (“Logistix”) (a subsidiary of EMAK Europe) 4. Johnson Grossfield, Inc., a Delaware corporation 5. Equity Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation 6. Upshot, Inc., a Delaware corporation 7. SCI Promotion, Inc., a Delaware corporation 8. Logistix, Inc., a Delaware corporation 9. Pop Rocket, Inc., a Delaware corporation 10. EMAK Worldwide Service Corp., a Delaware corporation 11. EMAK Europe Holdings Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (“EMAK Europe”) 12. EMAK Europe Services Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (a subsidiary of EMAK Europe) 13. EMAK Hong Kong Limited, a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK) 14. EMAK China Limited, a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK) 15. Virtual Video Company Limited, a United Kingdom company (a subsidiary of Logistix) 16. EMAK Asia Holding Company Limited, a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of EMHK) 17. Megaprint Group Limited, a United Kingdom company (“MGL”)(a subsidiary of EMAK Europe) 18. Megaprint Limited, a United Kingdom company (a subsidiary of MGL) 19. Megapromotions (U.K.) Limited, a United Kingdom company (a subsidiary of MGL) 20. Megapromotions Beheer BV, a Dutch company (“MBBV”)(a subsidiary of MGL) 21. Megapromotions BV, a Dutch company (a subsidiary of MBBV) 22. Mint Holland BV, a Dutch company (a subsidiary of MBBV) 23. Megapromotions GmbH, a German company (a subsidiary of MBBV) 24. Promomega EURL, a French company (a subsidiary of MBBV) 25. Megapromotions Asia, Ltd., a Hong Kong company (a subsidiary of MGL) 26. Prodesign Marketing Limited, a Northern Ireland company (a subsidiary of EMAK Europe)
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit 21.1


      STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc., a Delaware corporation

    The Selmer Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation

        Vincent Bach International, a corporation organized under the laws of
        the United Kingdom

        The Steinway Piano Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation

           Steinway, Inc., a Delaware corporation

               The O.S. Kelly Corporation, a Delaware corporation

                   The O.S. Kelly Company, an Ohio corporation

           Steinway & Sons, a New York corporation

           Boston Piano Company, a Massachusetts corporation

           Boston Piano GmbH, a corporation organized under the laws of Germany

              Hermann Kluge Beteiligungs-GmbH, a corporation organized under the
                 laws of Germany

              Hermann Kluge GmbH & Co. KG, a limited partnership organized under
                 the laws of Germany

              Bohn Claviaturen GmbH & Co. KG, a limited partnership organized
                 under the laws of Germany

                   Bona Sp. Z O.O., a limited liability company organized under
                      the laws of Poland

           S & B Retail, Inc., a Delaware corporation

           Steinway & Sons Japan, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws
              of Japan

        The SMI Trust, a Massachusetts business trust

    Emerson Musical Instruments, Inc., a Delaware corporation
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 13, 2020 

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

DEFERS ACTION ON I FUND TRANSITION 

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) announced that it 

has deferred the transition for the I Fund benchmark from the MSCI Europe, Australasia and Far 

East (EAFE) Index to the MSCI All Country World ex US Investable Market Index (ACWI ex 

USA IMI). 

The FRTIB last reviewed its decision relating to the I Fund benchmark in November 2019, and, 

since that time, has been pursuing the finalization of the change as originally voted on by the 

Board in November 2017. 

Due to a meaningfully different economic environment related in large part to the impact of the 

global COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the nomination of three new FRTIB Board Members, 

pending further study, the FRTIB Board is delaying the implementation of the I Fund 

Benchmark change to the MSCI ACWI ex-U.S. Investible Market index from the MSCI EAFE 

index.

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for Federal employees; it 

is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private 

employers. As of April 2020, TSP assets totaled approximately 

$593.7 billion, and retirement savings accounts were being 

maintained for more than 5.9 million TSP participants. 

Participants include Federal civilian employees in all branches 

of Government, employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members 

of the uniformed services. Additional information can be found 

at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver

202-942-1641

(end)
STATE OF MINNESOTA March 16, 2016

IN SUPREME COURT 

A15-1274 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against 

James Richard Mayer, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 0312241. 

ORDER 

fl 

Om~ OF 

APPB.lAlECcuns 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition 

for disciplinary action alleging that respondent James Richard Mayer committed 

professional misconduct warranting public discipline--namely, misappropriating funds 

from a non-profit organization, including by forging signatures on checks, while serving 

as an officer of that non-profit. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b) and 8.4( c). 

Respondent waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional 

Responsibility (RLPR), withdraws his previously filed answer, and unconditionally admits 

the allegations in the petition. The parties recommend that, in light of mitigating factors, 

the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for 

reinstatement for 18 months. 

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended 

disposition. 

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 

1 
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Respondent James Richard Mayer is indefinitely suspended from the practice 

of law, effective as of the date of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for 

18 months. 

2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18( a)-( d), RLPR. 

Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional responsibility 

portion of the state bar examination and satisfaction of continuing legal education 

requirements pursuant to Rule 18( e), RLPR. 

3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant 

to Rule 24, RLPR. 

Dated: March 16, 2016 BY THE COURT: 

~~ t>f 

David R. Stras 

Associate Justice 

LILLEHAUG, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2049 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2049

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit taxpayers to elect 
   a nonincremental credit for 5 percent of their aerospace-related 
   research expenditures in lieu of the incremental research credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 1993

Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself and Mrs. Kennelly) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit taxpayers to elect 
   a nonincremental credit for 5 percent of their aerospace-related 
   research expenditures in lieu of the incremental research credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 41 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for increasing 
research activities) is amended by redesignating subsections (g) and 
(h) as subsections (h) and (i), respectively, and by inserting after 
subsection (f) the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Elective Nonincremental Credit for Aerospace Businesses.--If 
the taxpayer elects the benefits of this subsection for a taxable 
year--
            ``(1) the research credit determined under subsection (a) 
        for such taxable year shall include a credit equal to 5 percent 
        of the qualified research expenses of the taxpayer which are 
        attributable to any aerospace-related business (as defined by 
        the Secretary) of the taxpayer, and
            ``(2) in determining the amount of the credit determined 
        under subsection (a)(1) for such taxable year, the qualified 
        research expenses which are so attributable shall not be taken 
        into account.
``An election under this subsection may only apply to either or both of 
the taxpayer's first 2 taxable years beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this subsection.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to taxable 
years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 36967

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

LARRY GENE FRANKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 484

Filed: May 26, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bingham County. Hon. Jon J. Shindurling, District Judge. 

Order revoking probation and reinstating previously suspended unified twelveyear sentence, with five-year determinate term, for sexual abuse of a minor child, 

affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

______________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Larry Gene Franks pled guilty to sexual abuse of a minor child, I.C. § 18-1506(1)(b), and 

the district court imposed a unified twelve-year sentence with a five-year determinate term. The 

district court suspended the sentence and placed Franks on probation. This probation was 

subsequently revoked and the suspended sentence ordered into execution. On appeal, Franks

does not challenge the district court’s decision to revoke probation, but argues only that this 

sentence is excessive and that the district court should have sua sponte reduced Jones’s sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). 

When we review a sentence that is ordered into execution following a period of 

probation, we will examine the entire record encompassing events before and after the original 

judgment. State v. Hanington, 148 Idaho 26, 29, 218 P.3d 5, 8 (Ct. App. 2009). We base our 

review upon the facts existing when the sentence was imposed as well as events occurring 

between the original sentencing and the revocation of probation. Id. Applying these standards, 

and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its 

discretion.

Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing execution of Franks’s previously 

suspended sentence is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK OKEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 339 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of December, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary Financial Information extracted from the 
 balance sheet and statements of operations for the nine months ended 
 September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
 financial statements.
</LEGEND>                     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         138,802
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,168,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,007,200
<INVENTORY>                                    35,010,866
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               78,220,495
<PP&E>                                         55,920,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,485,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,453,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,802,757
<BONDS>                                        33,303,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,222,550
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,465,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,453,600
<SALES>                                        99,477,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               99,477,525
<CGS>                                          84,714,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  84,714,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               190,120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,697,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,429,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,366,054
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,063,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,063,440
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.55
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1 — Certification of Chief Executive Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302**I, Mark K. Tonnesen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (“Amendment No. 1”) of Triad GuarantyInc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;March 21, 2006/s/ Mark K. Tonnesen
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2139 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.R.2139

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications 
and Records


         Commission for fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 2504(f)(1) of title 44, United States Code, is amended_
        (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking out ``and'' after the 
    semicolon;
        (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking out the period and 
    inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
            ``(D) $6,000,000 for fiscal year 1994;
            ``(E) $7,000,000 for fiscal year 1995;
            ``(F) $8,000,000 for fiscal year 1996; and
            ``(G) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1997.''.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`