alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Schedule 5.1.3 Navion Subsidiaries
                                                                to the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement
                                                                      between Statoil ASA and Statpet AS
                                                                                     and Norsk Teekay AS
                                                                                  dated 15 December 2002

Navion Subsidiaries

We refer to the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement (the Agreement) entered into on 15 December 2002
between Statoil ASA (Statoil) and Statpet AS (Statpet) on the one side and Norsk Teekay AS on the
other side.

Words and expressions defined or used in the Agreement have the same meanings in this Schedule, unless
the contrary is expressly stated or where those meanings would be clearly inconsistent in the relevant
context.

We hereby represent and warrant that as of the Signing Date the total share capital of the Navion
Subsidiaries are as follows:

`Name:                                               Reg. No.:          Share capital:                


Navion Shipping Holding AS                          982 770 971          146.000.000 NOK
Navion Shipping AS                                  979 199 902          145.000.000 NOK
Navion Shipping Operations AS                       977 045 029            1.000.000 NOK
Navion Chartering AS (50 %)                         883 437 632            1.000.000 NOK
Navion Maritime AS                                  979 199 252        1.619.300.000 NOK
Rasmussen Navion KS                                 979 210 876        1.044.000.000 NOK
Rasmussen Navion AS                                 979 178 476           35.000.000 NOK
Navion Technology AS                                979 433 425           10.000.000 NOK
Navion Offshore Loading AS                          984 837 771              100.000 NOK
Navion Caspian Region AS                            983 665 705            1.000.000 NOK
Caspian Transportation Holding (Cyprus) Ltd.        HE 1296 84                 1.000 CVP
Navion Inc.                                                                  450.000 USD`
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

BRYAN MICHAEL HASKELL, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-30182 

D.C. No. 

1:17-cr-00079-BLW-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2019

Seattle, Washington

Before: BERZON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and ROTHSTEIN,** District 

Judge.

The district court properly denied Bryan Haskell’s motion to suppress the 

shotgun found in his car. Under Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609

(2015), police officers may not “measurably extend the duration of [a] stop” unless 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, United States District Judge 

for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUL 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Page 2 of 2

 

the cause for the delay falls within the stop’s “mission.” Id. at 1615. Given the 

specific circumstances of this case, which are not those of a run-of-the-mill traffic 

stop, the officer’s asking whether there was anything in the car he should be 

concerned about was reasonably related to his mission.

At the moment the officer asked Haskell about the contents of his car, the 

officer intended to leave Haskell with instructions to park the car in the 

neighboring middle school parking lot. Haskell, who police learned had been 

driving on a suspended license, could not himself drive the car home. Rather, he 

would have to contact someone to come and drive the car away. Because Haskell 

had not yet made any plans to have the car retrieved, the officers had no way of 

knowing how long the car would remain parked outside the school. Nor could the 

officers stay with the car until help arrived, given the snowy conditions and their 

need to leave the scene to attend to other accidents. As far as the police knew, it 

was possible that the car could be left in the school parking lot unattended for days. 

In that situation, the officer’s concern as to the car’s potentially dangerous contents

and his request for consent to search the car fell permissibly within the scope of his 

mission. Since the officer’s actions did not violate Haskell’s Fourth Amendment 

rights, the district court correctly denied his motion to suppress. 

AFFIRMED.
Certification

I, Deng Zhi Ren, certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Great China International Holdings, Inc. for theperiod ended March 31, 2006; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.     The small business issuer'sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer'sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors andthe audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thesmall business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00227-CV

JOSE LUIS GARCIA

v.

JOANNA ANAYA

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-1377-11-7

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 16, 2014.
666 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Ioaormblr Ooorgo Ii. 8h+ppwd 

0clr~tro~l.r of Publir ArrouPtr 

Autla, Tour 

Boar Bitt 

ortr the opinion 

thu u u~ouat 

Ar#hltooturil 

8hlp ‘Of that Baird 

l br th. h&l&UFO 

br the La&lirlaturr for 

o St&a Boar6 of Arohior the pn?~omr of a.- 

l rrr4ull~,laaurrod bf 

l rblairtrrtloa of the 

noat bf the kgirlature. 

r uttum. rhloh l oatributb in no 

th r l drialitration of rooh lam l ro 

whatsoever to the rnforoonwnt of thr law8 intrusted to that 

Board ror adminlatration. You are therororcr adrlaed that 

t4o aooount for this purpose may n?t be paid from the l ppropriationr mad8 to ths Board of Arohitrotural Exlainerr, 

Yourr rrrr trul7 

- -..v “T --I!? 

ATTORRISY 5- 01 TEXAS
Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or Administrative

Adjustment Request (AAR) Form 8082 OMB No. 1545-0790

(Rev. February 1998)

(For use by partners, S corporation shareholders, estate and domestic trust beneficiaries,

foreign trust owners and beneficiaries, REMIC residual interest holders, and TMPs) Attachment

Department of the Treasury Sequence No. 84 Internal Revenue Service © See separate instructions.

Name(s) shown on return Identifying number

General Information

1 Check boxes that apply:

2 If you are a TMP filing an AAR on behalf of the pass-through entity, are you requesting substituted return

treatment? (see instructions)

3 Check applicable box to identify type of pass-through entity:

4 Identifying number of pass-through entity 6 Tax shelter registration number (if applicable) of pass-through entity

5 Name, address, and ZIP code of pass-through entity 7 Internal Revenue Service Center where pass-through entity filed its return

8 Tax year of pass-through entity / / to / /

9 Your tax year / / to / /

Inconsistent or Administrative Adjustment Request (AAR) Items

(b) Inconsistency is in,

or AAR is to correct

(check boxes that

apply)

(c) Amount as shown on

Schedule K-1, Schedule Q,

or similar statement, a

foreign trust statement, or

your return, whichever

applies (see instructions)

(a) Description of inconsistent or

administrative adjustment request (AAR) items

(see instructions)

(e) Difference between

(c) and (d) (d) Amount you are reporting

Amount of

item

Treatment

of item

10

11

12

13

Explanations—Enter the Part II item number before each explanation. If more space is needed, continue

your explanations on the back.

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Form 8082 (Rev. 2-98)

Part III

Part I

Part II

Cat. No. 49975G

Yes No

(a) Partnership (b) S corporation (c) Estate (d) Trust (e) REMIC

(a) Notice of inconsistent treatment (b) Administrative adjustment request (AAR)
Form 8082 (Rev. 2-98) Page

2

Part III Explanations (continued)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FOR THE
QUARTERLY  REPORT  10-Q AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY REFERNCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000829092
<NAME>                        MARRIOT RESIDENCE INN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-19-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         4,715
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,877
<PP&E>                                         201,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (62,425)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,040
<BONDS>                                        116,920
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,017
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,983
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,791
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Letters of Authorization To Take Marine Mammals

AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of a letter of authorization to take marine 
mammals incidental to oil and gas industry activities.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service implementing regulations [50 CFR 18.27(f)(3)], notice is hereby 
given that a Letter of Authorization to take polar bears incidental to 
oil and gas industry exploration activities has been issued to the 
following company:
    Company: BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
    Activity: Production.
    Location: Northstar.
    Date Issued: January 9, 2001.

CONTACT: Mr. John W. Bridges at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99503, (800) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Letters of Authorization are issued in 
accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Rules and 
Regulations ``Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified 
Activities (65 FR 16828; March 30, 2000).''

    Dated: January 29, 2001.
David B. Allen,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-3736 Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have issued our reports dated May 25, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Navarre Corporation and subsidiaries on Form 10-K/A No. 1 for the year ended March 31, 2012. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Navarre Corporation on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-161514, effective October 23, 2009; File No. 333-133280, effective January 12, 2007) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-170247, effective November 1, 2010; File No. 333-147280, effective November 9, 2007; File No. 333-119260, effective September 24, 2004; File No. 333-131986, effective February 22, 2006; File No. 33-80218, effective June 14, 1994; File No. 33-86762, effective November 29, 1994; File No. 333-31017, effective July 16, 1997; File No. 333-87143, effective September 15, 1999; File No. 333-91710, effective July 1, 2002 and File No. 333-109056, effective September 23, 2003).







/s/ Grant Thornton LLP











Minneapolis, Minnesota


July 26, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR THE 
QUARTERLY REPORT 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000829092             
<NAME>                        MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-26-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         3,419
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,116
<PP&E>                                         207,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (66,965)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28,970
<BONDS>                                        109,032
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,173
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,035
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132867 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132867 COA: 262695 Oakland CC: 2004-197050-FC GREGORY HAROLD COMBS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201800181

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

Jeremiah TERRY

Electronics Technician Seaman (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander William H. Weiland, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 9 October 2018

_________________________

Before FULTON, CRISFIELD, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

FOR THE COURT

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the second quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
           reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              44,037
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,824)
<INVENTORY>                                59,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           101,794
<PP&E>                                     1,046,462
<DEPRECIATION>                             (71,297)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,159,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      71,041
<BONDS>                                    174,882
<COMMON>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                 483,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,159,994
<SALES>                                    205,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           205,800
<CGS>                                      208,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              208,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           11,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         18,361
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (31,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (12,003)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (19,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (19,624)
<EPS-BASIC>                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0




</TABLE>