alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ahmed Sheppard, Appellant.

[609 NYS2d 318]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered February 5, 1991, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he caused physical injury to the police officer who was attempting to arrest him is not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, we find the defen*702dant’s contention to be without merit. Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish assault in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The People proved that the officer injured his hand in the course of his struggle with the defendant. The hand was swollen, black and blue, and stiff, the officer sought medical treatment, the injury was very painful, and the officer was not able to return to work until four days after the incident. The jury’s determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 01-3005) published on pages 9085 and 9086 of the issue for Tuesday, February 6, 2001.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago  heading, the entry for America United Bancorp,  Inc., Schaumburg, Illinois, is revised to read as follows:

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 606901-1413:                

*1.  AmericaUnited Bancorp, Inc.*, Schaumburg, Illinois; proposes to retain and continue to engage                     *de novo*                     in the nonbanking activity of extending credit and servicing loans, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Comments on this application must be received by February 20, 2001.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 12, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-3895 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2168

To reduce the column 1-general rate of duty on piperonyl butoxide (PBO).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. GRANDY (for himself and Mr. CASTLE) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To reduce the column 1-general rate of duty on piperonyl

butoxide (PBO).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON PIPERONYL

4 BUTOXIDE (PBO).

5 Subchapter VI of chapter 29 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 after subheading 2932.90.20 the following new sub8 heading, with the article description having the same de9 gree of indentation as the article description for sub10 heading 2932.90.30:

‘‘ 2932.90.28 Piperonyl butoxide (PBO) ............. 6.3% Free (CA, E,

IL)

15.4¢/kg +

52% ’’.
2

•HR 2168 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints R.
Scott Wheeler, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to
this report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their, his or her substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


 /s/ Richard N. Beckert
-------------------------------------
 Richard N. Beckert                                          March 30, 1999


 /s/ Robert A. Whitman
-------------------------------------
 Robert A. Whitman                                           March 30, 1999


 /s/ Richard M. FitzPatrick
-------------------------------------
 Richard M. FitzPatrick                                      March 30, 1999


 /s/ Daniel A. Decker
-------------------------------------
 Daniel A. Decker                                            March 30, 1999


 /s/ L. Scott Demerau
-------------------------------------
 L. Scott Demerau                                            March 30, 1999


 /s/ Julia E. Demerau
-------------------------------------
 Julia E. Demerau                                            March 30, 1999


 /s/ James T. Hands
-------------------------------------
 James T. Hands                                              March 30, 1999


 /s/ William M. Kearns, Jr.
-------------------------------------
 William M. Kearns, Jr.                                      March 30, 1999


 /s/ Steven D. Scheetz
-------------------------------------
 Steven D. Scheetz                                           March 30, 1999


 /s/ Bert W. Wasserman
-------------------------------------
 Bert W. Wasserman                                           March 29, 1999
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Ivory ARTIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-6457.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 24, 2014.

Decided: April 28, 2014.

Christopher Ivory Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Gordon James, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Ivory Artis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Artis,*No. 5:02-cr-00308-BO-l (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 19, 2013, entered Mar. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2391

FAYE BEATRICE HAYES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TERRI GORMAN, Official Capacity Individual Capacity; SEAN ADGERSON, 

Individual Capacity Official Capacity; JAMES C. NEWTON, SR., Individual 

Capacity Official Capacity; BART P. PLANO, Individual Capacity Official 

Capacity; WILLIAM ROMMEL, Individual Capacity Official Capacity; MASS 

TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, Official Capacity Individual Capacity; STATE 

OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00691-RDB)

Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Faye Beatrice Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Scott Hartwig, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Faye Beatrice Hayes appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor 

of Defendants on Hayes’ several civil claims against them, including discrimination and 

retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 

U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018). Confining our review to the 

issues raised in Hayes’ informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Hayes 

v. Gorman, No. 1:18-cv-00691-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                     /s/Gary Mentesana
                                     Gary Mentesana
                                     Principal Executive Officer and
                                     Principal Financial Officer
                                     Arch Street VIII, LP, as
                                     Managing General Partner of
                                     Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII,
                                     A Limited Partnership


                                     Date:   July 16, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2 (906 Cert)

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, John Chieffo,  Chief Financial Officer of
Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey (the "Company"),  hereby certify that
the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended March 31,
2005,  containing the financial  statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable
Contract  Real  Property  Account (a  separate  account of Pruco Life  Insurance
Company of New  Jersey)  and The  Prudential  Variable  Contract  Real  Property
Partnership  (the "Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of Pruco  Life of New  Jersey  Variable
Contract  Real  Property  Account  and The  Prudential  Variable  Contract  Real
Property Partnership.

Date: May 13, 2005

/s/ John Chieffo
----------------

Name: John Chieffo
Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4320]



[[Page 11113]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 87 and 101

[WT Docket No. 99-327, FCC 00-272]


24 GHz Service; Licensing and Operation

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is to show rules amended by the Commission in 
order to implement licensing and operation of the 24 GHz band, shall 
become effective February 22, 2001. These sections, which contained new 
information collection requirements, were published in the Federal 
Register December 28, 2000, (OMB No. 3060-0963). This is to let the 
public know the effective date of the rules that contain new 
information collection requirements.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The amendments to 47 CFR 101.527 and 101.529 published 
at 65 FR 59350 (October 5, 2000) are effective February 22, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Shaffer, Public Safety and Private 
Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0680.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 25, 2000, the Commission adopted a 
Report and Order (``Order'') (FCC 00-272) to implement licensing and 
operation of the 24.25-24.45 GHz and 25.05-25.25 GHz bands, a summary 
of which was published in the Federal Register. See 65 FR 59350 
(October 5, 2000). We stated that the Port 101 of the Commission's 
rules, 47 CFR Part 101, is amended effective December 4, 2000, except 
for Secs. 101.527 and 101.529 which contains information collections 
that are not effective until approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget. We also stated that the Commission will publish a document in 
the Federal Register announcing the effective date for those sections. 
This statement requires further action by the Commission to establish 
the effective date, notwithstanding the preceding statement in the 
summary that the rule change would become effective upon OMB approval. 
In order to resolve this matter in a manner that most appropriately 
provides interested parties with proper notice, the rule changes 
adopted in the Order shall become effective February 22, 2001. The 
information collection was approved by OMB on December 1, 2000. See OMB 
No. 3060-0963.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 90

    Communications equipment, Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4320 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gregory Lucas PENA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-41276

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 24, 2010.

Michelle Suzanne Englade, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jani Jo Maselli, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Gregory Lucas Pena has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pena has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Vesta Insurance Group, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms
S-8 (Nos. 33-74160, 33-81114, 33-81126, 33-80385, 33-80387, and 33-80395) of our
report dated March 12, 2000, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Vesta Insurance Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the years then ended,
which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vesta Insurance
Group, Inc., dated March 12, 2000.


                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 30, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2440 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2440

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 9 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to authorize 
  appropriations for fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 1996, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Independent Safety Board Act 
Amendments of 1993''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 309(a) of the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 (49 
U.S.C. App. 1907(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``There are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of 
this Act not to exceed $37,580,000 for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1994, $44,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, 
and $45,100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996; such 
sums to remain available until expended.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A
KNOWING OR WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION.



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

      Re:  SOLA International Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

            (i) this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

            (ii) the information contained in this amended report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of SOLA International Inc.

Dated as of this 24th day of June, 2004.



/s/ Jeremy C. Bishop                      /s/ Ronald F. Dutt
------------------------------------      ------------------------------------
Jeremy C. Bishop                          Ronald F. Dutt
President and Chief Executive Officer     Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
8813 Partnership Withholding Tax Payment Voucher (Section 1446) Form

 See separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813. OMB No. 1545-1119

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813. Cat. No. 10681H Form 8813 (Rev. 12-2005)

For calendar year , or tax year beginning , 20 , and ending , 20

2 Amount of this payment

$

Partnership’s U.S. employer identification

number

1

Mail this voucher with a check

or money order payable to the

“United States Treasury.” Write

the partnership’s employer

identification number, tax year,

and “Form 8813” on the check

or money order.

3 PARTNERSHIP’S name, address, (number, street, and room or suite no.), city, state, and ZIP code. If a P.O.

box or foreign address, see instructions.

(Rev. December 2005)

 Do not staple or attach this

voucher to your payment.

 Do not send cash.

 If you have elected to apply the

provisions of Regulations section

1.1446-6T, attach the required

schedule and certifications.