alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     373,700
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               52,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                329,053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           997,174
<PP&E>                                                   7,742,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,981,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          13,073,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,079,918
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    2,200,000<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                              1,702,983
<COMMON>                                                   124,577
<OTHER-SE>                                              36,602,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            13,073,494
<SALES>                                                    298,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           346,839
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         4,374,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         622,854<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (4,460,317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (4,460,317)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.43


<FN>
<F1> Represents balance of 7% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [ Tag #21 ]

<F2> Interest  expense  includes  $497,603 of  amortization of debt discount and
     expenses, a non-cash item [ Tag # 32 ]
</FN>


</TABLE>
SCHEDULE P 

(Form 8865)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Changes of Interests 

in a Foreign Partnership 

(under section 6046A)

▶ Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

OMB No. 1545-1668

2010

Name of person filing Form 8865 Filer’s identifying number

Name of foreign partnership

Part I Acquisitions

(a) 

Name, address, and identifying number of 

person from whom your interest was acquired

(b) 

Date of acquisition

(c) 

FMV of 

interest acquired

(d) 

Basis in 

interest acquired

(e) 

% of interest 

before acquisition

(f) 

% of interest 

after acquisition

Part II Dispositions

(a) 

Name, address, and identifying number of 

person who acquired your interest

(b) 

Date of disposition

(c) 

FMV of 

interest disposed

(d) 

Basis in 

interest disposed

(e) 

% of interest 

before disposition

(f) 

% of interest 

after disposition

Part III Change in Proportional Interest

(a) 

Description of change

(b) 

Date of change

(c) 

FMV of 

interest

(d) 

Basis in 

interest

(e) 

% of interest 

before change

(f) 

% of interest 

after change

Part IV Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions)

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25943Q Schedule P (Form 8865) 2010
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2023. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 30, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0146. HAROLD LEE DOBY v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2019RCCR00615
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              QUAKER CITY BANCORP

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    For the Year   For the Year   For the Year
                                   Ended June 30, Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
                                        1999           1998           1997
                                   -------------- -------------- --------------
 <C> <S>                           <C>            <C>            <C>
     Average Common Shares
 A   Outstanding................      5,392,564      5,469,646      5,509,836
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------
 B   Net earnings for Period....     $9,644,000     $6,610,000     $2,820,000
                                     ==========     ==========     ==========
     Basic Earnings Per Share [B
     / A].......................          $1.79          $1.21          $0.51
                                     ==========     ==========     ==========
     Common Share Equivalents:
 C   Stock Options Outstanding..        571,279        602,107        499,128
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------
 D   Option Exercise Price......          $8.50          $7.86          $4.80
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------
 E   Exercise Proceeds [C x D]..     $4,855,872     $4,732,561     $2,395,814
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------
     Average Market Price in
 F   Period.....................         $16.00         $17.13         $11.06
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------
     Shares Repurchased At
 G   Market Price [E / F].......        303,492        276,273        216,620
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------
     Increase in Common Shares
 H   [C - G]....................        267,787        325,834        282,508
                                     ----------     ----------     ----------
     Shares Outstanding and
 I   Equivalents [A + H]........      5,660,351      5,795,480      5,792,344
                                     ==========     ==========     ==========
 J   Net Earnings for Period....     $9,644,000     $6,610,000     $2,820,000
                                     ==========     ==========     ==========
     Diluted Earnings Per Share
     [J / I]....................          $1.70          $1.14          $0.49
                                     ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          83,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  798,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (46,306)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,444,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,514,309
<PP&E>                                         261,806
<DEPRECIATION>                               (108,661)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,465,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          346,705
<BONDS>                                      1,386,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       173,418
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,559,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,465,940
<SALES>                                      1,815,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,815,553
<CGS>                                        1,189,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,189,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               758,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (131,945)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (161,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (161,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (161,647)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00216-CR

JOSE CARLOS VELAZQUEZGONZALEZ,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1719081)

August 1, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00370-CV

IN RE STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 8, 2018

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 4, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, and the real party in interest 

filed a response. After considering the petition and response, this court concludes relator is not 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17-088, styled State National Insurance Co. v. Stonehouse Builders, LLC, 

pending in the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas, the Honorable Bill R. Palmer presiding.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 10.9.4    QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION CHANGE IN
                  CONTROL AGREEMENT RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT BETWEEN
                  QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION AND KATHRYN
                  M. HENNIGAN DATED JULY 1, 1998.


                QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Participant:    Kathryn M. Hennigan
                    --------------------------------


The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 25, 1998, the Board of Directors of Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association acted to renew and extend the Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association Change in Control Agreement with the
undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30,
2000.


Dated this 1st day of July, A.D., 1998.


                                       QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN 
                                       ASSOCIATION


/s/ Kathryn M. Hennigan                By: /s/ Frederic R. McGill
---------------------------               --------------------------
Participant                               President
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, Michael G. Rubin, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of GSI Commerce, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



May 3, 2005



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Rubin                    
|    |  | Michael G. Rubin                        
|    |  | Co-President and Chief Executive Officer



4
EX-10.26





 Exhibit 10.26 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO

 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

WHEREAS, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. Amended
and Restated 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (as may be amended from time to time, the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board
of Directors of the Company have determined it in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 13 thereof to provide for an additional number of shares of Common Stock (as defined in the Plan) currently available for
issuance under the Plan. 
 NOW THEREFORE, effective as of the date approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Plan. 


  

	 	2.	 Stock Subject to the Plan. The first sentence of Section 5(a) of the Plan shall be amended and
restated in its entirety to reflect the increase in available shares of Common Stock to read as follows: 


 “The
aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable under the Plan shall be equal to One Million Forty One Thousand Eight Hundred (1,041,800) plus any shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding awards under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date
that on or after such date cease for any reason to be subject to such awards (other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the awards to the extent they are exercised for or settled in vested and nonforfeitable shares).” 

Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

This Amendment has been adopted by the Board of Directors as of February 24, 2020.
1

 The Honorable John C. Minahan, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of

Nebraska.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-6082NE

 

In re: *

*

Steven Clifford Molczyk *

Susan Kay Molczyk *

*

Debtors. *

*

Steven Clifford Molczyk * Appeal from the United

Susan Kay Molczyk * States Bankruptcy Court for 

* the District of Nebraska

Plaintiffs-Appellants, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

*

Collection Bureau of *

Grand Island, Inc. *

*

Defendant-Appellee. *

 

Submitted: November 23, 1999

Filed: December 2, 1999

 

PER CURIAM.

On October 19, 1999, the Bankruptcy Court1 entered an order granting in part

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and also granting in part Defendant’s CrossMotion for Summary Judgment. On November 17, 1999, the Plaintiffs filed a Notice of

Appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s order.
2

Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8002(a) requires the appellant to file a notice

of appeal “within 10 days of the date of the entry of the judgment, order, or decree appealed

from.” See Luedtke v. Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. (In re Luedtke), 215 B.R. 390, 391

(B.A.P. 8th Cir. 1997). Rule 8002(a)’s ten-day time frame is both mandatory and

jurisdictional. Luedtke, 215 B.R. at 391 (citing Crockett v. Lineberger, 205 B.R 580, 581

(B.A.P. 8th Cir. 1997)). Failure to comply with the ten-day time limit deprives the

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of jurisdiction. Id.

Because the relevant order was entered on October 19, a timely notice of appeal was

required on or before October 29. The Plaintiffs’ Notice of Appeal, filed on November 17,

was unquestionably out of time. Moreover, the Plaintiffs did not request an extension of

time for filing their notice of appeal under Rule 8002(c). Accordingly, we lack subject

matter jurisdiction over this appeal.

Based on the foregoing, the Plaintiffs appeal is DISMISSED.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-760

In Re: ELDON LOWELL YOCUM,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eldon Lowell Yocum, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although this court has, on occasion, transferred similar

actions to the appropriate district court, the obtuse nature of

Yocum's application prevents any degree of certainty regarding

which court that might be.

2

PER CURIAM:

Eldon Lowell Yocum, a federal prisoner, has filed in this

court an original petition for habeas corpus relief and a motion to

institute criminal proceedings against numerous individuals. See 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (1994). This court's jurisdiction over original actions for habeas corpus relief is significantly circumscribed. See

28 U.S.C. § 2242 (1994). As a result, we must dismiss this action.

Yocum's application is fatally flawed on several fronts. The

application is not verified and fails to identify with any specificity the conviction and sentence of which Yocum challenges the

validity.* A significant portion of the relief Yocum appears to be

seeking is the production of documents from various courts around

the country and is more appropriately sought in another forum.

Moreover, this court may only entertain such an application where

the document states the reason for failing to file the application

in the district court of the district in which he is in custody.

See id. Yocum baldly asserts that the district court is biased.

This assertion, without more, is not a sufficient reason for

failing to pursue this application in the most appropriate forum.

Because of the numerous deficiencies in Yocum's application, we

dismiss this attempt at habeas corpus relief.
3

Yocum's motion to "Charge Extortion" is denied because this

court does not institute criminal prosecutions. In light of our

dismissal of Yocum's petition, we deny both motions for release. We

deny the motions to file a civil complaint in this court and to

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C HA R L E S WANG , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. GO VE RNO R OF T HE S T AT E OF C A L I F O RN I A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 16303 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 1 -cv -0 5 6 4 8 -JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a m e s W a r e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t14, 2013 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , G R A B E R , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C ha r l e s W a ng appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e f e n d a n ts v io la te dh is F o u rte e n th A m e ndm e ntr i ght s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED AU G 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 16303 2 a n abus e of

di s c r e t i on adi s m i s s a l f orf a i l ur e t o s e rve the s um m ons a nd c om pl a i nt in atim e lym a n n e r . O

y am a v . She e han (

I n r e She e han) , 2 5 3 F .3 d5 0 7 , 5 1 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2001) . W e va c a t e a nd r e m a nd. C ontr a ryt o W a ng’ s c ont e nt i ons , W a ng di d notpr ope r l ys e rve the s um m ons a n dc o m p la in t. Se e B ar low v . G r ound , 39 F . 3d 231, 234 ( 9th C i r . 1994) (“ A l tho ug h C al i forni a l aw do es perm i tse rvi ce of a s um m on s by m ai l , such se rvi ce i s val i d o nl y i f asi gn ed ac kn ow l edgm enti s r eturned and other r equi re m ent s are com pl i ed w i th. ”) ; see a l so C a l. C iv . P r o c . C o d e § 4 1 5 .3 0 ( lis tin g th e r e q u ir e m e n ts for s ervi ce by m ai l un der C al i forni a l aw ). H o w e v e r , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt ab u s e dits d is c r e tio n in d is m is s in g s u as p o n te W a ng’ s a c t i on unde rR ul e 4( m ) be c aus e i tdi d notf i r s tgi ve W a ng not i c e a nd o p p o rtu n ityto s h o w g o o dc au s e w h ys e rv ic e w a s n o t m a d e . See Fe d . R. Ci v . P. 4( m ) ( r e c ogni z i ng tha tadi s tr i c tc ourtm a ys uas pont e di s m i s s ac om pl a i ntf or fa i l ure t o serve “ af

t erno t i ce t o the pl ai nt i ff ”) ; I n r e She e han , 253 F . 3d a t512- 13 ( di s c us s i ng R ul e 4( m ) ’ s “ good c aus e ” s t a nda r d a nd the di s c r e t i on a f f or de d a d is tr ic t c o u rt in e x te n d in g th e tim e f o rs e rv ic e e v e n in th e ab s e n c e o f g o o dc au s e ) . A cco rd i n g l y, w e v acat e th e j u d g m en tan drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.