alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11014-11015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4202]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-37-000]

Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District 
and Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. California Power Exchange 
Corporation; Notice of Complaint

February 14, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 12, 2001, the Salt River Project 
Agricultural Improvement and Power District (SRP) and the Sacramento 
Municipal Utility District (SMUD) (collectively, Complainants) 
submitted a Complaint Requesting Fast Track Processing against the 
California Power Exchange Corporation (PX) pursuant to section 206 of 
the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e. The Complainants allege that the 
PX is violating the default provisions in its tariff by issuing 
erroneous notices of default and charging other PX participants for 
payments owed to the PX and the California Independent System Operator 
(ISO) by Southern California Edison Company and Pacific Gas & Electric 
Company. The Complainants request that the Commission direct the PX 
immediately to: (i) Cease applying the charge back provisions in its 
tariff; (ii) cease issuing default notices pursuant to the charge back 
provisions in its tariff; and (iii) rescind all default notices issued 
previously against the Complainants.
    Copies of the filing were served upon the California Power Exchange 
Corporation, the California Public Utilities Commission, and all 
persons designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in Docket Nos. EL00-95-000, et al.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before March 5, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will

[[Page 11015]]

not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be 
viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 
202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be 
due on or before March 5, 2001. Comments and protests may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4202 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul D. Meyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/ Paul D. Meyer                                 
|Paul D. Meyer Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2005
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Joyce Brown, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mega Group, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c.) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a.) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: July 21, 2006                              By:    /s/ JOYCE BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOYCE BROWN
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                       13
Monthly CCC Honey Survey Price for Marketing Assistance Loans

 MONTH PRICE PER POUND

 (30-Day Repayment Rate)

 April 2024 $1.37

 March 2024 $1.36

 February 2024 $1.45

 January 2024 $1.58

 December 2023 $1.54

 November 2023 $1.68

 October 2023 $1.74

 September 2023 $1.76

 August 2023 $1.81

 July 2023 $1.82

 June 2023 $1.92

 May 2023 $2.13

 April 2023 $2.17

 

The loan repayment rate for nonrecourse marketing assistance loans is the lower of

principal plus interest or the 30-day repayment rate. If the 30-day repayment rate is higher 

than the principal plus interest, there is no loan deficiency payment (LDP) or marketing loan 

gain for that month. The nonrecourse marketing assistance loan program applies to 2019-2023

crop honey and provides a national average loan rate of 69 cents per pound. 

2024 Crop Year (April 1, 2024 – March 31, 2025)

Commodity Loan Rate 30-Day Repayment Rate LDP

Honey $0.69 $1.37 $0.00

The following 2024-crop premiums and discounts will only apply if the loan is

settled through delivery of the loan collateral to CCC:

Color & Class Premium/Discount for 2024 crop

(cents/pound)

White 3.4

Extra Light Amber 4.8

Light Amber -3.6

Amber & Nontable -15.3

The following 2023 crop premiums and discounts will only apply if the loan is

settled through delivery of the loan collateral to CCC:

Color & Class Premium/Discount for 2023 crop

(cents/pound)

White 5.5

Extra Light Amber 0.7

Light Amber -2.4

Amber & Nontable -17.5

Further program information is available from Francina F. Hentz at francina.hentz@usda.gov.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

PLUMA, INC.                                            

Computation of Earnings Per Share                      
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       
                                                          (Unaudited)  
                                                         Three Months  
                                                        Ended March 31
                                                     1997              1996
Income available to common shareholders:
 Net income available to common shareholders    $    864,435      $     78,055
                                                ------------      ------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding:                     
 Common shares outstanding                      $  5,899,185      $  5,315,852
                                                ------------      ------------
 Assumed exercise of stock options                     --               --  
                                                ------------      ------------
  Total                                         $  5,899,185      $  5,315,852
                                                ============      ============
Earnings per common share and common                            
 equivalent - primary and fully diluted         $       0.15      $       0.01
                                                ============      ============

                                                            
                                       11
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-347; MM Docket No. 00-171; RM-9926]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Wells and Woodville, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document reallots Channel 234C2 from Woodville, Texas, to 
Wells, Texas, and modifies the license for Station KVLL to specify 
operation on Channel 234C2 at Wells in response to a petition filed by 
Radio Woodville, Inc. See 65 FR 59162, October 4, 2000. The coordinates 
for Channel 234C2 at Wells are 31-12-37 and 94-57-15.

DATES: Effective March 26, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 00-171, adopted January 31, 2001, and released 
February 9, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

47 CFR PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by removing Woodville, Channel 234C2 and adding Wells, Channel 
234C2.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-4321 Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of GSI Commerce, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2005 (the Report) that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Michael G. RubinMichael G. RubinChief Executive Officer




August 10, 2005



By:

/s/ Jordan M. CoplandJordan M. CoplandChief Financial Officer




August 10, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1936

To make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1993 for the general

business guaranteed loans program of the Small Business Administration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mrs. MEYERS of Kansas (for herself, Mr. TALENT, Mr. ZELIFF, Mr. TUCKER,

Mr. KLINK, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana,

Mr. DICKEY, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, and Mr. SKELTON) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1993

for the general business guaranteed loans program of

the Small Business Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Admin5 istration Supplemental Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year

6 1993’’.

7 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS.

8 The following sums are appropriated, out of any

9 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to pro-
2

•HR 1936 IH

1 vide supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1993,

2 namely:

3 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

4 BUSINESS LOANS PROGRAM ACCOUNT

5 For an additional amount for the ‘‘Business loans

6 program account’’ for the cost (as defined in section 502

7 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974) of guaranteed

8 loans authorized by section 7(a) of the Small Business

9 Act, $140,883,000, to remain available until expended.

10 Not more than $2,000,000 of such amount may be made

11 available for administrative expenses of the guaranteed

12 loans program and may be transferred to and merged with

13 appropriations made available under Public Law 102–395

14 for ‘‘Small Business Administration—Salaries and ex15 penses’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVONDALE
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          67,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,375
<PP&E>                                         274,311
<DEPRECIATION>                               (137,001)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,046
<BONDS>                                         49,663
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,962
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,049
<SALES>                                        363,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,088
<CGS>                                          321,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  321,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Lorrie A. Hayes,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 13

- 0030 (JDB)

Neva Van Valkenburg,

Defendant.

M EMORANDUM

Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff ’ s remaining claim construed as brought under

42 U.S.C. § 2000a. Def

. ’ s Mot

. to Dismiss Pl

. ’s Compl

. [Dkt. # 11] ; see May 14, 2013 Order

[Dkt. # 8 ] (dismiss ing claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983)

. On June 3, 2 013, plaintiff was

ordered to respond to the instant motion by July 8, 2013, or risk summary dismissal of the case

on what would be treat ed as a conceded motion to dismiss. Order [Dkt. # 12]. Plaintiff has not

responded to the motion and has not sought additional time to respond. Hence, the Court will

grant defe ndant ’ s motion to dismiss as conceded and will now dismiss the case. A separate

Order accompanies this Memorandum.

____________s/________________

JOHN D. BATES

United States District Judge

DATE: August 2, 2013
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00340

- CR

Stetson Ketchersid

v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 424th of Burnet County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 48644

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 24, 2022
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1383

In re: PATRICIA L. HARRISON.

----------------------------------------------------------

PATRICIA L. HARRISON,

Respondent - Appellant,

ESTATE OF LATOYA NICOLE VALENTINE, by and through Debra Grate, 

Personal Representative; DEBRA GRATE, in her individual capacity,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES; THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR; HENRY D. MCMASTER; 

NIMRATA “NIKKI” HALEY; JOSHUA BAKER; CHRISTIAN SOURA; THE 

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL 

NEEDS; MARY POOLE; PATRICK J. MALEY; LOIS PARK MOLE; SUSAN 

BECK; BEVERLY BUSCEMI; STANLEY BUTKUS; KATHI LACY; WILLIAM 

BARFIELD; THOMAS WARING; ROBERT KERR; WILLIAM DANIELSON,

Defendants - Appellees,

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; PICKENS COUNTY DISABILITIES AND 

SPECIAL NEEDS BOARD; ELAINE THENA; JOHN OWENS; DIANE 

ANDERSON,

Defendants,

WILLIAM BOUTON

Respondent.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1383 Doc: 80 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00895-JFA)

Submitted: February 7, 2023 Decided: February 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Patricia Logan Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Ashley Limehouse, Jr., 

William Grayson Lambert, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 

Columbia, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, Kenneth Paul Woodington, 

DAVIDSON, WREN & DEMASTERS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Damon C. 

Wlodarczyk, RILEY POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; James Houston

Burns, Matthew Douglas Patterson, Thadeous Herbert Westbrook, III, Columbia, South 

Carolina, Miles Edward Coleman, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH 

LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1383 Doc: 80 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Patricia L. Harrison appeals the district court’s order sanctioning her pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s order granting 

sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Morris v. Wachovia Sec., Inc., 448 F.3d 268, 277 (4th 

Cir. 2006). After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the district court’s thorough 

order, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Estate of Valentine v. South 

Carolina, No. 3:18-cv-00895-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2022). We deny Harrison’s motions 

for judicial notice and for a stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1383 Doc: 80 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
SCHEDULE O 

(Form 8865)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership 

(under section 6038B)

▶ Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

OMB No. 1545-1668

2010

Name of transferor Filer’s identifying number

Name of foreign partnership

Part I Transfers Reportable Under Section 6038B

Type of 

property

(a) 

Date of 

transfer

(b) 

Number of

items

transferred

(c) 

Fair market 

value on date 

of transfer

(d) 

Cost or other 

basis

(e) 

Section 704(c)

allocation

method

(f) 

Gain recognized on

transfer

(g) 

Percentage interest 

in partnership after

transfer

Cash

Marketable 

securities

Inventory

Tangible 

property 

used in trade 

or business

Intangible 

property

Other 

property

Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions):

Part II Dispositions Reportable Under Section 6038B

(a) 

Type of 

property

(b) 

Date of 

original 

transfer

(c) 

Date of

disposition

(d) 

Manner of 

disposition

(e) 

Gain 

recognized by

partnership

(f) 

Depreciation

recapture 

recognized 

by partnership

(g) 

Gain allocated 

to partner

(h) 

Depreciation 

recapture allocated to 

partner

Part III Is any transfer reported on this schedule subject to gain recognition under section 904(f)(3) or 

section 904(f)(5)(F)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶ Yes No

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25909U Schedule O (Form 8865) 2010