alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E VA R I S T O Q UI NT AN AR - OL I VE R A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70608 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 163- 195 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , P A E Z , an d B E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E va r i s t o Q ui nt a na r - O l i ve r a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) or de rof de port a t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on



# FI LED APR20 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70608 2 u n d e r8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We r e v i e w d e n o v o q u e s t i o n s o f l a w. Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F . 3 d 7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he a ge nc ypr ope r l yde e m e d Q ui nt a na r - O l i ve r a ’ s appl i c a t i on f ora dj us tm e nt of s t a tus aba ndone d a f

t e rhe f a i l e d t o f i l e the appl i c a t i on by the de a dl i ne s e tbythe I J . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 31 (c ) ( autho ri zi ng IJt o setfi l i ng deadl i nes and deem w a iv e d a n yap p lic a tio n n o t f ile d b yth e d e a d lin e ) . T he I Jdi d note rrbyi s s ui ng ade c i s i on w i thoutaf urthe rhe a r i ng. B oth the IJand B IA grant ed Q ui nt anar -O l i vera ’ s r equestfor vol un t ary departure, and there w a s n o n e e d f

o rth e I Jto ru le o n Q u in ta n a r - O liv e r a ’s m o tio n to s u p p r e s s b e c au s e it w a s r e l e va ntonl yt o hi s e l i gi bi l i ty f orthe aba ndone d appl i c a t i on. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. C/O ROBERTS; C/O Tabor; Sgt. Ely, Defendants—Appellees, and B. Collins, Sgt.; M. Williams, C/O; H. Bishop, C/O; J. Durham, C/O; Sgt. King; Lt. Kilbourne; C/O Hylton; C/O Boyd; Ted Thompson, Dr.; M. Stanford, RN; Melissa Spears, LPN; Patsy Garnette Zeppa, RN; Patricia Hillman, RN, Defendants.

No. 10-6949.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 6, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.

See also, 2010 WL 291829.

Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fred Lewis Wilson appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a jury found in favor of Appellees and denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record, conclude that the issues Wilson raises do not present substantial questions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we decline to authorize preparation of the trial transcript at government expense and affirm the judgment of the district court. We grant Wilson’s motion to withdraw his September 2010 motion for production of documents and deny Wilson’s October 2010 motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
DISMISS; Opinion Filed August 1, 2013.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00659
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .W.P. AND D.W.P., CH ILDREN On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 12
- 16098 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Myers This is an appeal from the trial court’s temporary orders in a pending suit for divorce and for orders regarding conservatorship of the children. Because an appeal from an interlocutory order can only be taken if authorized by statute, and the Texas Family Code specifically precludes an interlocutory appeal from a n order for the temporary co nservatorship of a child, we directed appellant to file a letter brief demonstrating our jurisdiction over the appeal. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN
. § 105.001(e) (West 2008); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992). We directed appel lant to file the brief no later than July 8, 2013. To date, however, appellant has not complied or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, with no authority granting us jurisdiction over the complained

- of order, we DISMISS the appeal.
See T E X
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3 (a).

130659F.P05 /Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE130659 op.docx

– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF C.W.P. AND D.W.P., CHILDREN
No. 05

- 13

- 00659

- CV On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 12

- 16098. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Lang and Evans participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellee Brenda Mar ie Price recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Gary Wayne Price.
Judgment entered this 1st day of August, 2013.

/Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The following certification accompanies the issuers Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not
filed, as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986 dated June 5, 2003. In connection with the Annual Report of Torch Energy Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce L. Bisson, Vice President, of Wilmington Trust Company, the
trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Torch Energy Royalty Trust and will be retained by the Torch Energy Royalty Trust and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Dated: April 15, 2005 \s\Bruce L. BissonBruce L. Bisson, Vice President
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit. 99.2

                  CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 12 INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John J. Park, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/      John J. Park
         -----------------------------------
         John J. Park
         Chief Financial Officer
               3/25/03
         Date
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2177 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2177

To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 relating to advance notice of 
      changes of rates, fares, and charges for air transportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

  Mr. Oberstar (for himself and Mr. Clinger) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 relating to advance notice of 
      changes of rates, fares, and charges for air transportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADVANCE NOTICE OF RATE CHANGES.

    Section 404 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. App. 
1374) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Advance Notice of Rate Changes.--Any air carrier may provide 
advance notice to the public of the date on which a change of a rate, 
fare, or charge for air transportation is scheduled to take effect and 
the date on which a rate, fare, or charge for air transportation is 
scheduled to terminate.''.

                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3669

_____________________________

DARWIN EVANS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

March 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Darwin Evans, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
947 A.2d 1239

#### Rowena J. GBUR, Executrix of the Estate of Joseph Gbur, Jr., Deceased, and Rowena J. Gbur in Her Own Right, Respondents, v. Anthony GOLIO, M.D., Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 22, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

> Whether the MCARE Act foreclosed a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action against a urologist from offering expert *620testimony from a radiation oncologist to develop the applicable standard of care for the treatment of a cancer patient, upon the urologist’s review of a bone density study indicating “multiple foci of abnormal activity involving the right and left sides of the pelvis, the lower thoracic spine, right ribs, right mandible ... consistent with osseous metastatic disease.”

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
SCHEDULE P 

(Form 8865)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service

Acquisitions, Dispositions, and Changes of Interests 

in a Foreign Partnership 

(under section 6046A)

▶ Attach to Form 8865. See Instructions for Form 8865.

OMB No. 1545-1668

2012

Name of person filing Form 8865 Filer’s identifying number

Name of foreign partnership EIN (if any) Reference ID number (see instr.)

Part I Acquisitions

(a) 

Name, address, and identifying number of 

person from whom your interest was acquired

(b) 

Date of acquisition

(c) 

FMV of 

interest acquired

(d) 

Basis in 

interest acquired

(e) 

% of interest 

before acquisition

(f) 

% of interest 

after acquisition

Part II Dispositions

(a) 

Name, address, and identifying number of 

person who acquired your interest

(b) 

Date of disposition

(c) 

FMV of 

interest disposed

(d) 

Basis in 

interest disposed

(e) 

% of interest 

before disposition

(f) 

% of interest 

after disposition

Part III Change in Proportional Interest

(a) 

Description of change

(b) 

Date of change

(c) 

FMV of 

interest

(d) 

Basis in 

interest

(e) 

% of interest 

before change

(f) 

% of interest 

after change

Part IV Supplemental Information Required To Be Reported (see instructions)

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 8865. Cat. No. 25943Q Schedule P (Form 8865) 2012
#### NORTH STAR ALASKA HOUSING CORPORATION, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 10-122.

Dec. 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              ---------------------------------
                                                                2000         1999        1998
                                                              ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                        (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<S>                                                           <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income                                                    $   213.1   $   215.5   $   159.1
                                                              ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                              ---------   ---------   ---------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
   during each year - basic(1)                                     90.0        94.8        87.1

Weighted average number of common shares and common stock
   equivalents outstanding during each year - diluted(1)           91.2        96.5        89.9

Basic earnings per share(1)                                   $    2.37   $    2.27   $    1.83
                                                              ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                              ---------   ---------   ---------
Diluted earnings per share(1)                                 $    2.34   $    2.23   $    1.77
                                                              ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                              ---------   ---------   ---------
</TABLE>

----------
(1)  Share and per share data have been restated to reflect the impact of a
     2-for-1 split of the Company's stock on March 4, 1998.



                                       35
#### Adam Robert ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John C. MARSHALL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-55950.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 13, 2010.

Jan Burns Norman, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Adam Robert Robinson, San Luis Obispo, CA, pro se.

David Elgin Madeo, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

*242Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Adam Robert Robinson appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Robinson contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling based on his inability to access the law library during extended prison lockdowns. This contention fails because Robinson did not demonstrate how limited access to the library was the cause of his failure to timely file his petition. *See Ramirez v. Yates,*571 F.3d 993, 998 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that limitations on access to the law library “were neither extraordinary nor made it impossible for him to file his petition in a timely manner”) (internal citations omitted).

Robinson also contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling based on his pro se status and his belief that his appointed counsel was filing appropriate appeals. These contentions fail because pro se status is not, by itself, an extraordinary circumstance warranting equitable tolling, and because Robinson failed to present sufficient evidence that he was pursuing his rights diligently. *See Rasberry v. Garcia,*448 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir.2006); *see also Ramirez,*571 F.3d at 997-98 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that the lack of knowledge of a state court decision provides grounds for equitable tolling only where prisoner otherwise evidenced diligence).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Randi
Swatt, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

/s/ Randi Swatt
    -----------
    Randi Swatt, Chief Executive Officer and
    Acting Chief Financial Officer
    August 12, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2239 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2239

To authorize appropriations for the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 1993

 Mr. Dingell (for himself, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Markey, and Mr. Fields of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize appropriations for the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securities and Exchange Commission 
Authorization Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 35 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78kk) 
is amended to read as follows:

                   ``authorization of appropriations

    ``Sec. 35. There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the 
functions, powers, and duties of the Commission--
            ``(1) $281,900,000 for fiscal year 1994; and
            ``(2) $317,700,000 for fiscal year 1995.''.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BLUE RIBBON PACKAGING CORP D/B/A 

WEST READING STRAPPING, KEVIN 

LENEGHAN, STEPHEN LENEGHAN AND 

DAVID LENEGHAN,

Petitioners

v.

KEVIN HUGHES, NARROW HOLDINGS, 

LLC, LONGVIEW CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 

GEORGEADIS SETLEY RAUCH AND 

PLANK AND NICOLE PLANK,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 104 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

BLUE RIBBON PACKAGING CORP D/B/A 

WEST READING STRAPPING, KEVIN 

LENEGHAN, STEPHEN LENEGHAN AND 

DAVID LENEGHAN,

Petitioners

v.

KEVIN HUGHES, NARROW HOLDINGS, 

LLC, LONGVIEW CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 

GEORGEADIS SETLEY RAUCH AND 

PLANK AND NICOLE PLANK,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 105 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[104 MAL 2019 and 105 MAL 2019] - 2

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,876,962               1,779,012
<SECURITIES>                                    19,195                  19,195
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,829,441              26,546,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                   245,075                 852,581
<INVENTORY>                                 25,343,731              23,011,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,723,806              54,582,094
<PP&E>                                      24,379,057              20,810,533
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,422,537               5,962,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,587,774              90,452,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,630,416              36,272,736
<BONDS>                                     30,225,505              22,718,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,028,421                 989,882
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,542,021              49,154,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,587,774              90,452,585
<SALES>                                     98,547,846              91,402,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            98,547,846              91,402,046
<CGS>                                       61,200,041              59,647,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               92,153,984              88,385,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               108,399                  41,412
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,554,737               1,934,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,730,726               1,041,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,357,000                 429,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,373,726                 612,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,373,726                 612,212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24                     .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24                     .06


</TABLE>