alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2223 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 355

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2223

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in 
       Dallas, Texas, as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

             January 28 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
                                                       Calendar No. 355
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2223

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

             January 28 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in 
       Dallas, Texas, as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in Dallas, 
Texas, is designated as the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map, or other 
paper of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 is 
deemed to be a reference to the ``A. Maceo Smith Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Employer’s Annual Information Return of OMB No. 1545-0714

Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see page 4 of the separate instructions.

Type of establishment (check

only one box) Name of establishment

Use IRS label.

Make any

necessary

changes.

Otherwise,

please type or

print.

1 Evening meals only

Evening and other

meals

Number and street (See instructions.) Employer identification number 2

Meals other than

evening meals

City or town, state, and ZIP code 3

4 Alcoholic beverages

Establishment number

(See instructions.)

Employer’s name

Number and street (P.O. box, if applicable.)

City, town or post office, state, and ZIP code (If a foreign address, enter city, province or state, postal code, and country.)

Check the box if applicable: Final Return Amended Return

1 Total charged tips for 1997 1

2 Total charged receipts (other than nonallocable receipts) showing charged tips 2

3 Total amount of service charges of less than 10% paid as wages to employees 3

4a Total tips reported by indirectly tipped employees 4a

b Total tips reported by directly tipped employees 4b

c Total tips reported (Add lines 4a and 4b.) 4c

5 Gross receipts from food or beverage operations (other than nonallocable receipts) 5

6

6 Multiply line 5 by 8% (.08) or the lower rate shown here © granted by the

district director. Attach a copy of the district director’s determination letter to this return

7 Allocation of tips. If line 6 is more than line 4c, enter the excess here 7

This amount must be allocated as tips to tipped employees working in this establishment.

Check the box below that shows the method used for the allocation. (Show the portion, if

any, attributable to each employee in box 8 of the employee’s Form W-2.)

a Allocation based on hours-worked method (See instructions for restriction.)

b Allocation based on gross receipts method

c Allocation based on good-faith agreement (Attach copy of agreement.)

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

it is true, correct, and complete.

Signature © Title © Date ©

Cat. No. 49989U Form 8027 (1997)

Note: If you checked line 7a, enter the average number of employee hours worked

per business day during the payroll period. (See instructions. )

Apt. or suite no.

Note: If you have allocated tips using other than the calendar year (semimonthly, biweekly,

quarterly, etc. ), put an X on line 6 and enter the amount of allocated tips from your records

on line 7.

8 Enter the total number of directly tipped employees at this establishment during 1997 ©

1997

Note: Complete the Employer’s Optional Worksheet for Tipped Employees on page 4 of

the instructions to determine potential unreported tips of your employees.

© See Separate Instructions.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2126 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2126

          To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 1993

  Mr. Shays introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION LIMITATION AMOUNT FOR MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL 
              COMMITTEE CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES.

    Section 315(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 
(2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)(A)) is amended by striking out ``$5,000'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``$500''.

SEC. 2. PERCENTAGE LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MULTICANDIDATE 
              POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in, or Delegate 
or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress may not, with respect to a 
reporting period for an election, accept contributions from 
multicandidate political committees totaling in excess of 25 percent of 
all contributions accepted by the candidate with respect to the 
reporting period.''.

SEC. 3. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS 
              FROM PERSONS OTHER THAN LOCAL INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTS.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a), as amended by section 1, is further amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(j)(1) A candidate for the office of Representative in, or 
Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress may not, with 
respect to a reporting period for an election, accept contributions 
from persons other than local individual residents totaling in excess 
of 25 percent of all contributions accepted by the candidate with 
respect to the reporting period.
    ``(2) As used in this subsection, the term `local individual 
resident' means an individual who resides in the congressional district 
involved.''.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11

                             INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION
                  SCHEDULE REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                              (000's EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Twelve Weeks Ended          Twenty-Four Weeks Ended
                                               --------------------------    --------------------------
                                               November 14,  November 15,    November 14,  November 15,
                                                  1998          1997            1998          1997
                                               ------------  ------------    ------------  ------------

<S>                                              <C>           <C>             <C>           <C>
Net income                                       $ 32,107      $ 34,247        $ 66,598      $ 64,127
                                                 ========      ========        ========      ========

Basic weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                       72,053        73,230          72,358        73,876
Effect of dilutive stock compensation               1,029         1,495           1,082         1,427
                                                 --------      --------        --------      -------- 
Diluted weighted average common
 shares outstanding                                73,082        74,725          73,440        75,303
                                                 ========      ========        ========      ========

Earnings per share:
  Basic                                          $    .45      $    .47        $    .92      $    .87
                                                 ========      ========        ========      ========
  Diluted                                        $    .44      $    .46        $    .91      $    .85
                                                 ========      ========        ========      ========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Wilder Richman  Historic  Properties
II, L.P.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Neal Ludeke,  Chief Financial  Officer of Wilder Richman Historic
Corporation,  general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.



/s/Neal Ludeke
-------------------------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Wilder Richman
Historic Corporation, general partner of the Company
October 15, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Dewain VENSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-6054.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

Robert Dewain Venson, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Dewain Venson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Venson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

AMERICAN PETROLEUM 

INSTITUTE, 

Plain tiff/C 0 un terclaim 

Defendant, 

v. 

TECHNOMEDIA INTERNATIONAL, 

INC., 

Defendant/Counterclaim 

Plaintiff. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 09-529 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER fL.. ---- For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, it is this .:sUday of March, 

2010, hereby 

ORDERED that API's Motion to Dismiss Counts 1-3 and 5-6 of Techno Media's 

Amended Counterclaim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [#39] is GRANTED in part 

and DENIED in part; it is further 

ORDERED that Count I of the Amended Counterclaim is DISMISSED with 

prejudice, except as to TechnoMedia's claim that API is wrongfully withholding 

TechnoMedia's trade secrets; it is further 

ORDERED that Counts 2,3,5, and 6 of the Amended Counterclaim are 

DISMISSED with prejudice; it is further 

ORDERED that API's Motion to Strike Allegations of the Amended 

Counterclaim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) [#39] is GRANTED; it is further 

ORDERED that all allegations in the Amended Counterclaim concerning any 

association between API and Ecoman or between API and the Islamic Republic of Iranincluding, without limitation, the allegations contained at pages 1-2 and at paragraphs 30-

35, 77(d), 80(e), and 87 of the Amended Counterclaim-are hereby STRICKEN; it is 

further 
ORDERED that TechnoMedia's Application for Preliminary Injunction [#23] is 

DENIED; and it is further 

ORDERED that TechnoMedia's Motion for Leave to File Deposition Transcript 

Excerpts of Patrick Quinn in Support of TechnoMedia's Application for Preliminary 

Injunction [#62] is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED. 

RICHA . EON 

United States District Judge 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                G&L Realty Corp.
                              List of Subsidiaries

                                 March 31, 2003

1.    G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.    G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
3.    G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
4.    G&L Realty Financing II, Inc., a Delaware corporation
5.    G&L Realty Financing Partnership II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
6.    G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
7.    G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
8.    G&L Management Delaware Corp., a Delaware corporation
9.    G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
10.   G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11.   GLN Capital Co. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
12.   GL/PHP, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
13.   Theme World, L.P., a New Jersey limited partnership
14.   435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
15.   G&L Grabel San Pedro, LLC
16.   G&L Burbank, LLC
17.   G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
18.   G&L Holy Cross, LLC
19.   G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
20.   G&L Tustin, LLC
21.   G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
22.   G&L Valencia, LLC
23.   G&L Penasquitos, LLC
24.   G&L Penasquitos, Inc.
25.   GLH Pacific Gardens, LLC
26.   G&L Hoquiam, LLC
27.   G&L Lyons, LLC
28.   G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
29.   G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
30.   G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
31.   Lakeview Associates, LLC
32.   Tustin Heritage Place, LLC
33.   G&L Heritage Care, LLC
34.   G&L Heritage Care, Inc.
35.   G&L Massachusetts, LLC
36.   G&L Aspen, LLC
37.   G&L Tustin II, LLC
38.   G&L Tustin III, LLC


<PAGE>

39.   G&L Senior Care Partnership, L.P.
40.   G&L St. Thomas More, Inc.
41.   G&LRadius Realty, LLC
42.   GLR/Yorba Linda, LLC
43.   GLH Tarzana, LLC
44.   Pac Par MOB, LLC
45.   G&L Aurora, LLC
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2175

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit issuers of credit cards

from limiting the ability of governmental agencies to charge fees for

honoring credit cards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, and Mr. BOUCHER)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit issuers

of credit cards from limiting the ability of governmental

agencies to charge fees for honoring credit cards.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON LIMITING ABILITY OF GOV4 ERNMENTAL AGENCIES TO CHARGE FEES

5 FOR HONORING CREDIT CARDS.

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Chapter 2 of the Truth in Lend7 ing Act (15 U.S.C. 1631 et seq.) is amended by adding

8 at the end the following:
2

•HR 2175 IH

1 ‘‘§ 138. Prohibition on limiting ability of govern2 mental agencies to charge fees for honor3 ing credit cards

4 ‘‘A card issuer shall not prohibit or otherwise limit

5 the ability of Federal, State, or local governmental agen6 cies to assess and collect from the user of a credit card

7 issued by the card issuer a fee for honoring the credit

8 card.’’.

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

10 at the beginning of that chapter is amended by adding

11 at the end the following:

‘‘138. Prohibition on limiting ability of governmental agencies to charge fees for

honoring credit cards.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joey A. Jacobs, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
and I, Jack E. Polson, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 4, 2006
                                           /s/ Joey A. Jacobs
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Joey A. Jacobs
                                           Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and President

                                           /s/ Jack E. Polson
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Jack E. Polson
                                           Chief Accounting Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10QSB - CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS (LOSS) FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                187,907
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         145,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                            10,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,409,348
<PP&E>                                                 63,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      2,083,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 299,029
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                7,055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          1,777,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        2,083,528
<SALES>                                               346,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      347,758
<CGS>                                                 210,901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         210,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      493,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (357,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (357,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (357,132)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00
        

</TABLE>