alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SmithBarney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/David J. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.Vogel Citigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

March 29,2006

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
#### MARK HEINONEN *v.*JAMES M. MANDRACCHIA ET AL.

*Mark Heinonen,*pro se, in support of the petition.

*J. Kevin Golger,*in opposition.

Decided June 24, 2010

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 836 (AC 30858), is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVONDALE
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          55,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,533
<PP&E>                                         257,613
<DEPRECIATION>                               (132,151)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,051
<BONDS>                                         52,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,956
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,823
<SALES>                                        285,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,305
<CGS>                                          247,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  247,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,671
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew J. Mako, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-Q of Pruco  Life of New
Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ Andrew J. Mako
------------------
Andrew J. Mako

Chief Executive Officer and President

                                       26
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Eat at Joe’s, Ltd., on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      *"Report"*), the undersigned, Joseph Fiore, Chief Executive Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2007








/s/
      Joseph Fiore


Joseph
      Fiore


CEO,
      CFO,
      Chairman, Secretary, Director


(Principal
      Executive & Accounting Officer)








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2139

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Received

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

MARCH 1 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Committee discharged

AN ACT

To amend title 44, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications and

Records Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 2504(f) of title 44, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking ‘‘(f)(1)’’ and all that follows through

5 the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

6 ‘‘(f)(1) There are authorized to be appropriated to

7 the National Historical Publications and Records Commis8 sion such amounts as may be necessary to carry out this
2

HR 2139 CDS

1 chapter for each of fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,

2 and 1998.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.23

AMENDMENT NO. 2  TO  STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 2 to Stock Option Agreement is made as of the 6th day of December 2001, by and between LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") and John M. O'Haugherty ("Executive"),

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive entered into a Stock Option Agreement, dated December 31, 1992 and amended on October 8, 1993 (the "Original Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Original Agreement as set forth herein;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.    All
defined terms used herein and defined in the Original Agreement are used as defined in the Original Agreement.

2.    The
period in which the Option may be exercised, as set forth in Section 3 of the Original Agreement, is hereby extended from ten years to 12 years.

3.    In
all other respects, the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Stock Option Agreement as of the date first above written.

|LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION                   
|-----------------------------------------------------
|By:
Its                                              
|/s/JOHN M. O'HAUGHERTYJohn M. O'Haugherty (Executive)

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                   [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP]


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
GreenPoint Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries


We have audited the consolidated statements of income, changes in 
stockholders' equity and cash flows of GreenPoint Financial Corp. and 
Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1995.  These consolidated 
financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management.  Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial 
statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to 
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free 
of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, 
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and 
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall 
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above 
present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and the 
cash flows of GreenPoint Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries for the year ended 
December 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


                                           /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Jericho, New York
January 19, 1996
-.

. .... , ! ,&
i. 1 L OFFICE OF THE ArCORNEY GENERAL OF .TEXAS I. AUSTIN

. . . i Q-O.-N A--’

or on~.the presoription ors do this app,parsntlg i . ave admitted to me that. the

~“TheBoa??d

hae l.nstru&ed

me tb m&l thla matter to your attwtion, and ask if rruah ~aativity on the part of un Ostoopathiaphyslcl,an is not, uhen 3&entloml, culpable, as a purposlvc intent. to dcacive? Biridently SOJW of these doctors pro- ~, mm that sinoe they get a lloonse to practice *..
_,.

.Texas State Board of &Mica1 Examiners,page 2 ;.

. . -4 -tid.ic& and surgery in this state, they are also '..--a authorizedto asmme the .use of the title &I.

D.,

. ~Jihiah

they ,havenot earaed.' Ve interpret gctur letter as repuestin(S an 0pLnnion

as td whether the use, under the airounstancca descrlbed,.ofthe fkbbrev$etion

5X. D. * by a~ osteoptith violatesany provision of the Civil or GrimLnsl laws of this State.

. .S?ebcter*s Ikm International

Dictlonorygives this definitionof ,the

word 'doctor*: : 'AA acadenlo titlo,~ o&mlly tiplyi~g that its Pos~essckuas ao well versed in a desartrient~ of how edge.as to be qualified to teach;heAceS one ok who5 this title has been oonferredby a univtq-> “’ sitp OT co?.le2e,.or.other properly constitutedaut thority..AmAg the ohief doctoraldegrees are) f I@tOr of Mefiaine (BL D,.),. . .! ,:.

.. In the aase of Comonwealth Ve New England College oS Wropraatic, 

### 108 ht. B. 

### 895, 221 Hass, 190,~the oouIit said: 'Ihe word *doctor',



### .ie a prefix to a person's - n&ixe~sQ@.fles~a~ aoadenio distinotloA,foundsd upon having reoeiVt?d

a dcgmi, aAd 8s OOZIEion~y used, in-. &Gates still In the general subject 

### of medioZn8." There is.no statute, alvil or orLmiAal,* expressly prohibitIng the use of the abbreviation 'i& II." by a pers~on.u$on vhon the de~ee~"%edicinae DOotOr"hati tiot been oonfkrred,. '.. whether euah conduct ia “ culpable ” in the.sonsaof SKbjeatQq the individualto "censure or blame" ia not a Question of law, and we are not authorized aiid ~211 .'otuAdertaheto express8n . upon abstraot guegtions of.moralftyor professional Very truly pours

tmnzdb 

### diJ 4 BY ._..._ -. .. tf;

8. Allen % Assistant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in a real estate joint
venture.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance sheet is
unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying unaudited
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,761,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,124,650<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,072,083<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,124,650<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,224,516<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,361<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,157,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,157,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,157,155
<EPS-BASIC>                                     6.01<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include an investment
in unconsolidated partnership of $14,346,460.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of $52,567.
<F4>Total revenue includes equity in earnings of unconsolidated partnership
of $1,151,688 and other revenue of $72,828.
<F5>Other expenses consist of general and administrative expenses.
<F6>Represnet net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-256; MM Docket No. 00-204; RM-9983] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule, dismissal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission, at the request of M. Terry Carter and Douglas Sutton, Jr. d/b/a Tugart Communications, dismisses its request to allot Channel 236A to Blairsville, GA, as the community's first local aural service.                         *See*65 FR 66950, November 8, 2000. Channel 236A cannot be allotted to Blairsville in compliance with section 73.315 of the Commission's Rules because of a major obstruction between the proposed transmitter site and the community.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-204, adopted January 24, 2001, and released February 2, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 01-3961 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 1 , 2022

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00524

- CR

EX PARTE JESUS MARTI N RUVALCABA

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 1 776470

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant
, Jesus Martin Ruvalcaba
, has signed and filed a m otion for voluntary dismissal of his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.
We dismiss the appe al . We direct the clerk of the court to issue the mandate of the court immediately. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

Do Not Publish

– Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1714

___________ United States of America, * * Appeal from the United States Appellee, * District Court of the Northern v. * District of Iowa. * Adam Sharkey, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 22, 2003 Filed: January 29, 2004

___________ Before RILEY, BEAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.Adam Sharkey appeals the revocation of his supervised release and the thirtymonth imprisonment sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon revocation. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in acting within the statutory guidelines, we affirm. In 1996, Sharkey pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute over five grams of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. The district court sentenced Sharkey to 70 months' imprisonment and-2- five years' supervised release. He served his prison sentence and was placed on supervised release in 2001. During Sharkey's supervised release revocation hearing, he admitted that he was unsuccessfully discharged from several drug treatment programs; he failed to comply with drug testing by missing five scheduled urinary analyses; he used illegal drugs, testing positive eight times for cocaine and four times for marijuana; and was arrested twice–once for driving while license under suspension and disorderly conduct, and once for interference with official acts and driving while license under suspension. The district court revoked Sharkey's supervised release and sentenced him to thirty months' imprisonment followed by twelve months' supervised release. Sharkey appeals, asserting that the district court abused its discretion by revoking Sharkey's supervised release rather than extending it and modifying its conditions. Alternatively, Sharkey contests the length of imprisonment imposed. When a district court imposes a revocation sentence within the statutory limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the appellate court will not disturb that sentence absent an abuse of discretion. United States v. Grimes , 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir. 1995). Sharkey does not dispute that the district court's sentence is within the statutory maximum allowed for revocation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). The district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Sharkey's supervised release and imposing a thirty-month sentence. Sharkey's violations of the terms of his supervised release provide ample support for the court's action. The court recognized that there were no further resources in the community to offer Sharkey and the best thing to do for him was to get him back into the Bureau of Prisons residential drug abuse treatment program. The court's hope was that this sentence would help Sharkey hone his skills in treatment in order to stay clean and sober. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________