10982 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 21, 2001 / Proposed Rules

using of the expected’’ is corrected to

read ‘‘must be computed using the

expected’’.

§ 1.401(a)(9)–6 [Corrected]

10. On page 3942, column 3, line 2 of

the section heading of § 1.401(a)(9)–6,

the language ‘‘distributions as annuity

payments.’’ is corrected to read

‘‘distributions from defined benefit

plans.’’.

11. On page 3944, column 1,

§ 1.401(a)(9)–6, paragraph (a)(2) of A–3,

line 13, the language ‘‘the calendar year

that contains on the’’ is corrected to

read ‘‘the calendar year that contains

the’’.

12. On page 3945, column 2,

§ 1.401(a)(9)–6, paragraph (a) of A–10,

lines 11 and 12 from the bottom of the

paragraph, the language ‘‘starting date

but before the annuity starting date

determined under A–2 of’’ is corrected

to read ‘‘starting date but before the

required beginning date determined

under A–2 of’’.

§ 1.401(a)(9)–8 [Corrected]

13. On page 3947, column 1,

§ 1.401(a)(9)–8, paragraph (b) of A–2,

line 6 from the bottom of the paragraph,

the language ‘‘401(a)(9)(B)(iii) and (iv)

even through’’ is corrected to read

‘‘401(a)(9)(B)(iii) and (iv) even though’’.

14. On page 3949, column 1,

§ 1.409(a)(9)–8, paragraph A–13, line 6,

the language ‘‘section 242(b) was

preserved.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘section

242(b) of TEFRA was preserved.’’.

§ 1.403(b)–2 [Corrected]

15. On page 3950, column 1,

§ 1.403(b)–2, paragraph (c) of A–2, lines

1 and 2, the language ‘‘(c) The pre-’86

account balance and the post-’87

account balance have no’’ is corrected to

read ‘‘(c) The pre-’87 account balance

and the post-’86 account balance have

no’’.

§ 1.408–8 [Corrected]

16. On page 3950, column 3, § 1.408–

8, paragraph A–4, second line from the

bottom of the column, the language ‘‘the

IRA or, as permitted under A–8 of’’ is

corrected to read ‘‘the IRA or, as

permitted under A–9 of’’.

17. On page 3951, column 3, § 1.408–

8, paragraph A–8, line 15, the language

‘‘provided in A–4(a) of § 1.401(a)(9)–7

in’’ is corrected to read ‘‘provided in A–

4 of § 1.401(a)(9)–7 in’’

18. On page 3951, column 3, § 1.408–

8, paragraph Q–9, line 3, the language

‘‘permitted to distributed from another’’

is corrected to read ‘‘permitted to be

distributed from another’’.

19. On page 3952, column 1, § 1.408–

8, paragraph Q–10, line 1, the language

‘‘Q–10. Is the trustee of an IRA

required’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Q–10. Is

the trustee, custodian, or issuer of an

IRA required’’.

20. On page 3952, column 1, § 1.408–

8, paragraph A–10, line 1, the language

‘‘A–10. Yes. The trustee of an IRA is’’

is corrected to read, ‘‘A–10. Yes. The

trustee, custodian, or issuer of an IRA

is’’.

§ 54.4974–2 [Corrected]

21. On page 3952, column 1,

§ 54.4974–2, paragraph A–1, last line in

the column, the language ‘‘Q&A–6

provides a special rule for’’ is corrected

to read ‘‘Q&A–7 provides a special rule

for’’.

22. On page 3953, column 1,

§ 54.4974–2, the introductory text of

paragraph (b) of A–4, line 7 from the top

of the column, the language ‘‘A–2 of this

section. If the annuity’’ is corrected to

read ‘‘A–3 of this section. If the

annuity’’.

23. On page 3953, column 3,

§ 54.4974–2, paragraph Q–5, line 5, the

language ‘‘to be distributed under

section, what is’’ is corrected to read ‘‘to

be distributed under section 401(a)(9),

what is’’.

24. On page 3954, column 1,

§ 54.4974–2, paragraph A–7, line 5 from

the bottom of the paragraph, the

language ‘‘year which contains the

employee’s’’ is corrected to read ‘‘year

which contains the employee’s or

individual’s’’.

25. On page 3954, column 1,

§ 54.4974–2, paragraph A–7, last line of

the paragraph, the language ‘‘the

employee’s required beginning date.’’ is

corrected to read ‘‘the employee’s or

individual’s required beginning date.’’.

26. On page 3954, column 1,

§ 54.4974–2, paragraph (b)(1) of A–8,

second line from the bottom of the

paragraph, the language ‘‘employee’s

death before the employee’s’’ is

corrected to read ‘‘employee’s or

individual’s death before the employee’s

or individual’s’’.

27. On page 3954, column 2,

§ 54.4974–2, paragraph (b)(2) of A–8,

last line of the paragraph, the language

‘‘employee’s date of death.’’ is corrected

to read ‘‘employee’s or individuals date

of death.’’.

Cynthia Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special

Counsel (Modernization & Strategic

Planning).

[FR Doc. 01–3635 Filed 2–20–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01–374, MM Docket No. 01–41, RM–

10058]

Digital Television Broadcast Service;

Merced, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission requests

comments on a petition filed by Sainte

51, L.P., permittee of station KNSO(TV),

NTSC channel 51, Merced, California,

requests the substitution of DTV

channel 5 for station KNSO(TV)’s

assigned DTV 38. DTV Channel 5 can be

allotted to Merced, California, in

compliance with the principle

community coverage requirements of

Section 73.625(a) at reference

coordinates (37–04–18 N. and 119–25–

53 W.). As requested, we propose to

allot DTV Channel 5 to Merced with a

power of 12.9 and a height above

average terrain (HAAT) of 756 meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before April 9, 2001, and reply

comments on or before April 24, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,

Room TW–A325, Washington, DC

20554. In addition to filing comments

with the FCC, interested parties should

serve the petitioner, or its counsel or

consultant, as follows: Anne Goodwin

Crump, Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth.

P.L.C., 11th Floor, 1300 North 17th

Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209–3801

(Counsel for Sainte 51, L.P.).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam

Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202)

418–1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No.

01–41, adopted February 13, 2001, and

released February 14, 2001. The full text

of this Commission decision is available

for inspection and copying during

normal business hours in the FCC

Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW.,

Washington, DC. The complete text of

this decision may also be purchased

from the Commission’s copy contractor,

International Transcription Services,

Inc., (202) 857–3800, 1231 20th Street,

NW., Washington, DC 20036.

Provisions of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to

this proceeding.

Members of the public should note

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Rule Making is issued until the matter

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 21, 2001 / Proposed Rules 10983

is no longer subject to Commission

consideration or court review, all ex

parte contacts are prohibited in

Commission proceedings, such as this

one, which involve channel allotments.

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules

governing permissible ex parte contacts.

For information regarding proper

filing procedures for comments, see 47

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Television, Digital television

broadcasting.

For the reasons discussed in the

preamble, the Federal Communications

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR

part 73 as follows:

PART 73—TELEVISION BROADCAST

SERVICES

1. The authority citation for part 73

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and

336.

§ 73.622 [Amended]

2. Section 73.622(b), the Table of

Digital Television Allotments under

California is amended by removing DTV

Channel 38 and adding DTV Channel 5

at Merced.

Federal Communications Commission.

Barbara A. Kreisman,

Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 01–4208 Filed 2–20–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 224

[I.D. 072600A]

Endangered and Threatened Species;

Re-opening of Comment Period and

Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed

Range Extension for Endangered

Steelhead in Southern California

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; public hearing

and re-opening of public comment

period.

SUMMARY: NMFS is re-opening the

public comment period for, and has

scheduled a public hearing on, the

proposal to extend the current range of

endangered steelhead in southern

California. NMFS has received several

requests for a public hearing that would

allow further opportunity for the public

to participate in an exchange of

information among interested parties

and to provide oral and written

testimony on the proposal. NMFS has

determined that these requests are

reasonable and has scheduled a public

hearing and re-opened the public

comment period to facilitate the receipt

of the public’s views on the proposal.

DATES: A public hearing is scheduled in

San Clemente, California on March 12,

2001, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Written

comments on the proposed range

extension must be received by March

22, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be

held at the City of San Clemente’s

Community Center Auditorium which is

located at 100 N. Calle Seville in San

Clemente, CA. Written comments on the

proposed range extension and requests

for reference materials should be sent to

the Assistant Regional Administrator,

Protected Resources Division, NMFS,

Southwest Region, 501 West Ocean

Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA

90802-4213.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Craig Wingert, (562) 980-4021, or Chris

Mobley, (301) 713-1401. Copies of the

Federal Register documents cited

herein and additional salmon-related

materials are available via the Internet at

www.nwr.noaa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

In August 1997, NMFS listed the

Southern California steelhead

Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) as

an endangered species and defined its

southern limit as Malibu Creek in Los

Angeles County, CA, based on the

information available at that time. On

December 19, 2000, (65 FR 79328),

NMFS issued a proposed rule to extend

the current range of the Southern

California steelhead ESU southward to

include the population of steelhead

recently found in San Mateo Creek

which is located in northern San Diego

County. This proposal was based on

recent information indicating that

steelhead had been found in two coastal

river watersheds south of Malibu Creek,

and had successfully spawned in San

Mateo Creek. Within this redefined

Southern California steelhead ESU,

NMFS proposed to list naturally

spawned steelhead and their progeny

which reside below naturally occurring

and man-made barriers.

NMFS did not announce any public

hearings in its December 19, 2000 (65

FR 79328) proposal, but did indicate

that it would consider requests for

hearings received by February 2, 2001.

In late January 2001, NMFS received

several requests for a public hearing to

be held on this proposal. Requests for a

public hearing were received from

California Trout, the California Native

Plant Society, the Sierra Club, Trout

Unlimited, the Surfrider Foundation,

South Coast Audubon, and several

private individuals. NMFS has

determined that these requests are

reasonable, and, therefore, has

scheduled a public hearing and is reopening the public comment period to

accommodate the hearing as well as

provide sufficient notice of the hearing

date and location. During the extended

public comment period, NMFS is

continuing to solicit any specific

information, comments, data, and/or

recommendations on any aspect of the

December 19, 2000, proposal from all

interested parties. In particular, NMFS

is requesting information or data as

described in the Federal Register

document announcing the proposed

range extension (see 65 FR 79328). This

information is considered important in

helping NMFS make a final

determination on its proposal.

NMFS will consider all information,

comments, and recommendations

received during the extended comment

period and the public hearing before

reaching a final decision on the

proposal.

Dated: February 15, 2001.

William T. Hogarth,

Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,

National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 01–4290 Filed 2–20–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 010208032-1032-01; I.D.

121200L]

RIN 0648-AM47

Fisheries of the Northeastern United

States; Proposed 2001 Specifications

for the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery;

Regulatory Amendment

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed 2001 specifications for

the Atlantic bluefish fishery; regulatory

amendment; request for comments.