alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1981 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1981

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to clarify 
          the treatment of a qualified football coaches plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1993

 Mr. Brewster (for himself, Mr. McCrery, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Camp, Mr. 
   Bunning, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Crane, Mr. Sundquist, Mr. Paxon, and Mr. 
Thomas of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to clarify 
          the treatment of a qualified football coaches plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Qualified Football 
Coaches Plan Technical Corrections Act of 1993.''

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATIONS OF PUBLIC LAW 100-202.

    Section 1022 of title II of the Employee Retirement Income Security 
Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
subsection:
    ``(l) Qualified Football Coaches Plan.--For purposes of determining 
the qualified plan status of a qualified football coaches plan, section 
3(37)(F) shall be treated as part of this title and a qualified 
football coaches plan shall be treated as a multiemployer collectively 
bargained plan for purposes of title II the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974.''

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall apply to years beginning after 
the enactment of Public Law 100-202.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2388

To amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to establish

a preference in favor of service programs and projects conducted in

areas adversely affected by Federal actions related to the management

of Federal lands that result in significant regional job losses and economic dislocation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mrs. UNSOELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990

to establish a preference in favor of service programs

and projects conducted in areas adversely affected by

Federal actions related to the management of Federal

lands that result in significant regional job losses and

economic dislocation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PREFERENCE FOR PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS

4 CONDUCTED IN DISTRESSED AREAS.

5 (a) GRANTS UNDER THE YOUTH CORPS PROGRAM.—

6 Section 129(b) of the National and Community Service
2

•HR 2388 IH

1 Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12549(b)) is amended by striking

2 the period and inserting the following: ‘‘and ensure that

3 programs and projects would be conducted in areas where

4 they are needed most, including areas adversely affected

5 by Federal actions related to the management of Federal

6 lands that result in significant regional job losses and eco7 nomic dislocation.’’.

8 (b) GRANTS UNDER THE NATIONAL AND COMMU9 NITY SERVICE PROGRAM.—Section 142(a) of such Act (42

10 U.S.C. 12572(a)) is amended—

11 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’;

12 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at

13 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

14 (3) by adding at the end the following new

15 paragraph:

16 ‘‘(5) the extent to which the proposed program

17 would be conducted in areas where it is needed most,

18 including areas adversely affected by Federal actions

19 related to the management of Federal lands that re20 sult in significant regional job losses and economic

21 dislocation.’’.

Æ
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Richard P. Sawick               |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Name: Richard P. Sawick,       |   |
|                    |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |   | (Principal Accounting Officer)      |
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:May 15, 2009By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1485** 

KAREN L. DAVIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 01282

- JCC

- TCB )

Submitted : July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Karen L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Karen L. Davis appeals from the district court ’ s order s dismissing her employment discrimination complaint and amended complaint
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court
. Davis v. Navy Fed. Credit Union , No. 1:11

- cv - 01282

- JCC

TCB (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2012 & Mar. 20, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would no t aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
       
<S>                                    <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998          DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                 0<F1>                0<F1>
<SECURITIES>                           0<F1>                0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                          0<F1>                0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                           0<F1>                0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                            0<F1>                0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0<F1>                0<F1>
<PP&E>                                 0<F1>                0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                         0<F1>                0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         0<F1>                0<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0<F1>                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                0<F1>                0<F1>
<COMMON>                               0<F1>                0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0<F1>                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                            0<F1>                0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                             0<F1>                0<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           0<F1>                0<F1>
<SALES>                                0<F2>                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0<F2>                0
<CGS>                                  0<F2>                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0<F2>                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0<F2>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0<F2>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0<F2>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        0<F2>                0
<INCOME-TAX>                           0<F2>                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0<F2>                0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0<F2>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0<F2>                0
<CHANGES>                              0<F2>                0
<NET-INCOME>                           0<F2>                0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0<F2>                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0<F2>                0
<FN>
<F1>                                   See September 30, 1998 Statement of
                                       Net Assets in Liquidation
<F2>                                   See September 30, 1998 Statement of
                                       Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
VI

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2266

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 20, 1994

Received

AN ACT

For the relief of Orlando Wayne Naraysingh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR ORLANDO

4 WAYNE NARAYSINGH.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Orlando Wayne Naraysingh shall

6 be classified as a child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the

7 Immigration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval

8 of a relative visa petition filed under section 204 of such

9 Act by his adoptive parent and the filing of an application

10 for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
2

•HR 2266 RDS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Orlando Wayne

2 Naraysingh enters the United States before the filing

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other5 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

7 the date of the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe10 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant

11 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed

12 with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the

13 enactment of this Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Orlando Wayne Naraysingh, the Secretary of

17 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for

18 the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide

19 level of family-sponsored immigrants under section

20 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

21 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

22 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

23 parents, brothers, and sisters of Orlando Wayne

24 Naraysingh shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be
3

•HR 2266 RDS

1 accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi2 gration and Nationality Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,848
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    108,118
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          58,129
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            58,123
<LOANS>                                        488,519
<ALLOWANCE>                                     13,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 700,860
<DEPOSITS>                                     594,882
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,682
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,652
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 700,860
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 31,831
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,674
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                39,505
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,594
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,911
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 438
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,280
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,280
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.44
<LOANS-NON>                                      6,534
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,951
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    551
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                13,928
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,584
<RECOVERIES>                                       339
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,283
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,283
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

 Case No. 5D23-2119 

LT Case Nos. 2023-CC-005209 

 2023-CC-005760 

_____________________________ 

LEE GRANT, 

Appellant, 

v.

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE,

FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the County Court for Duval County. 

Scott F. Mitchell, Judge. 

Lee Grant, Jacksonville, pro se. 

Wendy L. Mummaw, Jacksonville, for Appellee. 

December 26, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4166]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(1190).
    Date and Time: March 25, 2001; 1 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Place: Oakland Marriott City Center, 1001 Broadway, Oakland, CA 
94067 (510) 451-4000.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Farley Fisher, Program Director, Division of 
Chemical & Transport Systems, Room 525, (703) 292-8371.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the FY 2001 
Research Equipment Panel of proposals as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4166 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2303

Relating to the tariff treatment of gum rosin and wood rosin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

Relating to the tariff treatment of gum rosin and wood

rosin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GUM ROSIN AND WOOD ROSIN.

4 Chapter 38 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

5 United States is amended by striking subheading

6 3806.10.00 and inserting in numerical sequence the fol7 lowing new superior text and subheadings, with the article

8 description for subheading 3806.12.00 having the same

9 degree of indentation as the article description in sub10 heading 3802.90.50:
2

•HR 2303 IH

‘‘ Rosin:

3806.12.00 Gum rosin or wood rosin .................. Free

‘‘ 3806.14.00 Other ................................................ 5% Free (A*,CA,

E,IL,J)

5%

’’.

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

3 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from

4 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec7 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

8 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro9 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

10 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

11 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend12 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

13 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

14 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the

15 enactment of this Act;

16 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

17 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

18 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

19 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

20 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
CAUSE NO. 29541 

STATE OF TEXAS § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

v. 196TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

PAMELA DIANE CONTRERAS HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

On October 6, 2015, the Court conducted a hearing in the above numbered and 

entitled cause pursuant to an Order of the Court of Appeals, Fifth Appellate District. 

After the hearing, the Court makes the following Findings and Recommendations: 

1. The Court finds that Pamela Diane Contreras ("Defendant" herein) is 

indigent, and wishes to prosecute the appeal of this matter in Appellate Cause Number 

05-15-00544-CR. 

2. The Court finds that Mr. Jason Duff, appellate counsel for Defendant, has 

failed to file appellant's brief herein due to his heavy appellate schedule. 

3. Mr. Duff has assured this Court that he will file appellant's brief not later 

than 5:00p.m. on Friday, October 9, 2015. 

4. The Court therefore recommends to the Hon. Fifth Appellate District 

Court that it allow Mr. Jason Duff to file Appellant's Brief on or before Wednesday, 

October 9, 2015 at 5:00p.m., and that this Court be allowed to remove him as appellate 

counsel should he fail to do so. 

SIGNED on this the 13111 day ofOctob 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAGE SOLO 

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 10/13/2015 4:20:38 PM LISA MATZ Clerk
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Shamoli Kapoor, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Kuwait Airways Customs Service Dept., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Shamoli Kapoor, appellant pro se.Condon &amp; Forsyth, LLP (John Maggio of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered June 7, 2016. The judgment, after an inquest, dismissed the action.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs. </p><p>In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the principal sum of $4,999. After defendant defaulted, an inquest was held, at which plaintiff testified that she had purchased a $1,726 round-trip ticket for travel on defendant's airline from New York to India, but that, upon her arrival at the airport, she had not been allowed to board defendant's airplane because of the expiration date on her passport. She further alleged that she had previously been misadvised by defendant's employee that she would be permitted to travel even though her passport was due to expire within six months of her anticipated arrival in India. Plaintiff also claimed that, as a result of the actions of defendant's employees, she had lost wages. Following the inquest, the Civil Court dismissed the action.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; <i>see</i> CCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). "[A] small claims judgment may not be overturned simply because the determination appealed from involves an arguable point on which an appellate court may differ; the deviation from substantive law must be readily apparent and the court's determination <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>clearly erroneous" (<i>Forte v Bielecki</i>, 118 AD2d 620, 621 [1986]; <a href="../2016/2016_05637.htm" target="_blank"><i>see also Tranquility Salon &amp; Day Spa, Inc. v Caira</i>, 141 AD3d 711</a>, 712 [2016]; <a href="../2017/2017_27355.htm" target="_blank"><i>Hohenberger v Smithtown Cent. Sch. Dist.</i>, 58 Misc 3d 6</a>, 8 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2017]). </p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that the judgment provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804, 1807).</p><p>We note that we do not consider any materials that are dehors the record (<i>see Chimarios v Duhl</i>, 152 AD2d 508 [1989]).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 12, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>