alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

JOSEPH A. CUNNINGHAM, JR., § 

 § No. 492, 2016 

 Defendant Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court of the 

 § State of Delaware 

 v. § 

 § C.A. No. N12L-11-093 

FEDERAL NATIONAL § 

MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION § 

JP MORGAN CHASE, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

 

 Submitted: October 17, 2016 

Decided: January 6, 2017 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER

This 6th day of January 2017, having considered the appellant’s response to 

the Clerk’s notice to show cause, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) Joseph A. Cunningham, Jr. filed this appeal from the Superior Court’s 

order of September 14, 2016, granting a motion to amend a complaint in a 

mortgage foreclosure action filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. The Clerk issued a 

notice directing Cunningham to show cause why the appeal should not be 

dismissed for his failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when filing an 
2

appeal from an apparent interlocutory order. Absent compliance with Rule 42, this 

Court has no jurisdiction to consider an interlocutory appeal.1

(2) In his response to the notice to show cause, Cunningham takes issue 

with the Superior Court’s order of September 14, 2016, and he raises other 

defenses and claims related to the underlying mortgage foreclosure action. 

Cunningham does not address the jurisdictional issue raised in the notice to show 

cause. 

(3) Absent compliance with Rule 42, this Court’s appellate jurisdiction is 

limited to the review of a trial court’s final judgment. A judgment is final for 

purposes of appeal when it disposes of all justiciable matters.2 In this case, the 

Superior Court’s order of September 14, 2016 was not the final judgment in the 

mortgage foreclosure action. Under these circumstances, Cunningham’s appeal 

must be dismissed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED 

under Supreme Court Rules 29(b) and 42. 

BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

 Justice 

 

1

Julian v. State, 440 A.2d 990 (Del. 1982). 

2

J.I. Kislak Mortg. Corp. v. William Matthews, Builder, Inc., 303 A.2d 648, 650 (Del. 1973).
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-12504

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00357-WSD-LTW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC DONYS SIMEU,

a.k.a. Martell Collins,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(December 5, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal 

waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 

997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced 

Case: 17-12504 Date Filed: 12/05/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 

F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of 

the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 17-12504 Date Filed: 12/05/2017 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2029 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2029

    To authorize the provision of community adjustment and economic 
diversification assistance in connection with the closure of Homestead 
                        Air Force Base, Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1993

  Mrs. Meek introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the provision of community adjustment and economic 
diversification assistance in connection with the closure of Homestead 
                        Air Force Base, Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVERSION ASSISTANCE FOR HOMESTEAD AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA.

    (a) Assistance Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense shall provide 
assistance under section 2391(b) of title 10, United States Code, to 
the State of Florida and local governments in Dade County, Florida, for 
the purpose of planning and carrying out a community adjustment and 
economic diversification program in connection with Homestead Air Force 
Base, Florida.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Defense $10,000,000 for fiscal year 
1994 to carry out this section.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         318,989
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,913
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                70,653
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,999,905
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         522,632
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      7,158,029
<ALLOWANCE>                                    107,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,803,580
<DEPOSITS>                                   8,250,736
<SHORT-TERM>                                   308,444
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             91,443
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,288,524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           68,775
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,066
<OTHER-SE>                                     852,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              13,803,580
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                145,812
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               95,257
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               241,069
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              62,862
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,873
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          110,334
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,815
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   9
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 84,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,669
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      58,669
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,305
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.49
<LOANS-NON>                                     43,182
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,674
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               107,871
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,449
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,977
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              107,214
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           107,214
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
# Policy Memo Food Distribution Programs

Policy Memo SNAP

- CSFP: Income Guidelines for 2024 This memorandum transmits the 2024 income guidelines for state agencies and tribes in determining the eligibility of individuals applying to participate in CSFP.
- Updated Instructions for the SAE Recovery Process and SAE Financial Status Report Updated instructions for the state administrative expenses recovery process and SAE financial status report (FNS-777-SAE) for child nutrition programs.
- FY 2024 Commodity Credit Corporation TEFAP Funding This memorandum provides information about the approximately $943 million in additional support for emergency food programs that USDA is providing in fiscal year 2024 under the statutory authority of the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act for distribution through TEFAP.
- FD-154: TEFAP, CSFP - Cancellation of Policy Memoranda FD-138 and FD-141 In order to update and streamline policy guidance for CSFP and TEFAP, FNS is cancelling Policy Memoranda FD-138 and FD-141.
- FD-154: TEFAP, CSFP - Cancellation of Policy Memoranda FD-138 and FD-141 In order to update and streamline policy guidance for CSFP and TEFAP, FNS is cancelling Policy Memoranda FD-138 and FD-141.
- TEFAP – State Plan Requests and Allocations for FY 24 Farm to Food Bank Projects The purpose of this memo is to allocate funding for Farm to Food Bank Projects in FY 2024.
- CSFP Submission of Additional Caseload Requests and State Plans for 2024 This document provides information on the requirements for submission of additional CSFP caseload requests for states and ITOs wishing to increase their assigned caseload in 2024.
- Guidance for Submitting Amendments to TEFAP State Plans per 7 CFR 251.6 This memorandum provides guidance to TEFAP state agencies on how to submit proposed&nbsp;amendments to their TEFAP state plans as discussed in existing regulations.
- FDPIR Administrative Match Waiver for Substantial Burden Memorandum The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance on submitting an administrative match waiver request for substantial burden [substantial burden waiver].&nbsp;
- FD-152: Discontinuance of the High Security Seal Requirement for USDA Foods Deliveries The USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will discontinue the requirement for vendors to use high security seals to secure USDA Foods deliveries as of July 1, 2023.&nbsp;
#### CICERO BOOKER, JR. *v.*MICHAEL J. JARJURA ET AL.

*Howard K. Levine,*in support of the petition.

*Frederick W. Krug,*in opposition.

Decided June 2, 2010

The petition by the defendant Dov Braunstein for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 1 (AC 29941), is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Global Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), We, Anastasios N. Kyriakides, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and b) The information contained in this Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/ Anastasios N. Kyriakides                      
|Anastasios N. Kyriakides,                         
|Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                  
|/s/ Bill
Rodriguez                                
|Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer           
|                                                  
|April 3, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 No. 333-23849, 33-87988 and 33-87990) pertaining to the 1996 
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Plan, the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 
the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of Pacific Crest Capital, Inc. of our report 
dated February 1, 1996, with respect to the 1995 consolidated statements of 
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows of Pacific Crest Capital, 
Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 
31, 1997.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
-----------------------------

Los Angeles, California
March 17, 1998


                                      49
Freddie Mac's Primary
              Mortgage Market Survey®30YR FRM
          15YR FRMCopyright 2024,
            Freddie Mac.
            Averages are for conforming mortgages with 20% down.Avg.
        6.88
        6.16
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2291

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for

home office expenses where the taxpayer’s sole fixed business location

is in the home.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1993

Mr. GRAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

deduction for home office expenses where the taxpayer’s

sole fixed business location is in the home.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subparagraph (A) of section 280A(c)(1) of the

4 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain busi5 ness use) is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(A) as the principal place of business for

7 any trade or business of the taxpayer or as the

8 sole fixed location of business for any trade or

9 business of the taxpayer,’’.
2

•HR 2291 IH

1 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

2 apply to all taxable years whether beginning before, on,

3 or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**SECTION 302 - CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT**
     I, Mark D. Woodburn, President of the registrant, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Natural Health Trends Corp.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
96

 

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005   /s/ Mark D. Woodburn     Mark D. Woodburn  President  
97
AMENDMENT NO. 1
                            AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        EXECUTIVE EXCESS RETIREMENT PLAN


         WHEREAS,  Avondale  Industries,   Inc.,  a  corporation  organized  and
existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana,  adopted the Executive Excess
Retirement Plan (the "Plan") effective January 1, 1989;

         WHEREAS, Avondale Industries, Inc. reserved the right to amend the Plan
by resolution of the Board of Directors; and

         WHEREAS, Avondale Industries, Inc. desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                                       I.

         The reference to "age 65" in Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby replaced
with the words "age 75".

                                       II.

         Except as  amended  hereby,  the Plan  shall  remain in full  force and
effect.

         Executed this 2nd day of February, 1998.


                                                 AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC.


/s/ Jackie H. Walker                             By: /s/ Thomas M. Kitchen
--------------------                                 ---------------------
/s/ Joy T. Rinaldi
--------------------
<PAGE>
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                            AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        EXECUTIVE EXCESS RETIREMENT PLAN


         WHEREAS,  Avondale  Industries,   Inc.,  a  corporation  organized  and
existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana,  adopted the Executive Excess
Retirement Plan (the "Plan") effective January 1, 1989;

         WHEREAS, Avondale Industries, Inc. reserved the right to amend the Plan
by resolution of the Board of Directors; and

         WHEREAS, Avondale Industries, Inc. desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                                       I.

         Section  3.1  of  the  Plan  is  hereby  amended by  adding thereto the
following Paragraph (c):

                  (c)   For purposes of computing the benefits  provided in this
                        Section 3.1,  a Participant  who  has deferred  all or a
                        portion of his compensation shall have that compensation
                        considered  in the  year earned  rather than in the year
                        paid.

                                       II.

         In  order  to  conform  the  cross-references  to  the Pension  Plan as
restated effective January 1,  1997, the reference in Section 3.2 of the Plan to
Section 6.2 of the Pension Plan is hereby changed to "Section 6.5 of the Pension
Plan."

                                      III.

         Except  as  amended  hereby,  the  Plan shall  remain in full force and
effect.

         Executed this 5th day of May, 1998.


                                                 AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC.


/s/ George E. White, Jr.                         By: /s/ Thomas M. Kitchen
------------------------                         -------------------------
/s/ Jackie H. Walker
------------------------
#### In the Matter of: HERITAGE ORGANIZATION, L.L.C., Debtor AE Marketing, L.L.C., Appellant v. Jenkins-Baldwin Corporation; Meralex, L.P.; Revanche, L.L.C.; Howard M. Jenkins; Hillel A. Meyers; Thomas K. Russell; Bonnie S. Saunders, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Donald G. Saunders, Appellees.

Nos. 12-10985, 13-10557, 13-10558.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 16, 2014.

Robert Clary, Owens, Clary & Aiken, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Appellant.

Stacy R. Obenhaus, Debbie E. Green, Gardere Wynne Sewell, L.L.P., John W. Bickel, II, Assistant General Counsel, Charles Dunham Biles, Esq., William A. Brewer, III, Esq., Bickel & Brewer, Dallas, TX, Alexander Carl Chae, Attorney, Gardere Wynne Sewell, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Appellees.

■ Before REAVLEY, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. *See*5th Cir. R. 47.6.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2177

To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 relating to advance notice

of changes of rates, fares, and charges for air transportation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself and Mr. CLINGER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 relating to

advance notice of changes of rates, fares, and charges

for air transportation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADVANCE NOTICE OF RATE CHANGES.

4 Section 404 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49

5 U.S.C. App. 1374) is amended by adding at the end the

6 following:

7 ‘‘(e) ADVANCE NOTICE OF RATE CHANGES.—Any air

8 carrier may provide advance notice to the public of the

9 date on which a change of a rate, fare, or charge for air

10 transportation is scheduled to take effect and the date on
2

•HR 2177 IH

1 which a rate, fare, or charge for air transportation is

2 scheduled to terminate.’’.

Æ