alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23
                                  ----------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) of Skyline Chili, Inc. of our report dated December 1, 1995, included
in the 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of Skyline Chili, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-17795) pertaining to the Skyline Chili, Inc. 1986 Stock Option
Plan, and Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-45297, No. 33-74584, and
No. 33-78604) pertaining to the Skyline Chili, Inc. 1990 Stock Option and Stock
Incentive Plan of our report dated December 1, 1995, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Skyline Chili, Inc. incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report (10-KSB) for the year ended October 29, 1995.


                                                Ernst & Young LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
January 25, 1996
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Physics (1208).                    

*Date/Time:*                         March 21-22, 2001 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; March 23 from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at Michigan State University.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Bradley D. Keister, Program Director for Nuclear Physics, Room 1015N, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703-292-7377.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To conduct a Scientific Review and an Operations Review of the Coupled Cyclotro Facility.                    

*Agenda:*                         To hear presentations and write recommendations concerning the Coupled Cyclotron Facility.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; information or personnel and proprietary data for present and future subcontracts. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 13, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-3979 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2266

AN ACT

For the relief of Orlando Wayne Naraysingh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR ORLANDO

4 WAYNE NARAYSINGH.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Orlando Wayne Naraysingh shall

6 be classified as a child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the

7 Immigration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval

8 of a relative visa petition filed under section 204 of such

9 Act by his adoptive parent and the filing of an application

10 for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.
2

•HR 2266 EH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Orlando Wayne

2 Naraysingh enters the United States before the filing

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other5 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

7 the date of the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe10 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant

11 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed

12 with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the

13 enactment of this Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Orlando Wayne Naraysingh, the Secretary of

17 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for

18 the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide

19 level of family-sponsored immigrants under section

20 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

21 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

22 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

23 parents, brothers, and sisters of Orlando Wayne

24 Naraysingh shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be
3

•HR 2266 EH

1 accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi2 gration and Nationality Act.

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 1994.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2266

AN ACT

For the relief of Orlando Wayne Naraysingh.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lois A. Toth, Treasurer of Capital Directions, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2003 which this accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
Capital Directions, Inc.

|                       |  |                 
|---------------------- |  | ----------------
|Date: November 7, 2003 |  | /s/ Lois A. Toth
|                       |  |                 
|                       |  | Lois A. Toth    
|                       |  | Treasurer       

21
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

April 28, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30926

Summary Calendar

JAMES H. MURUNGI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA,

Successor in interest to Mercedes Benz Credit Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-1778-N

--------------------------------------------------------------

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James H. Murungi appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil suit as frivolous and

as barr ed by res judicata , and from the imposition of sanctions pursuant to F E D

. R. C IV

. P. 11(c).

Murungi argues that the district court erred in determining that his case was barred by the doctrine

of res judicata since the defendant’s alleged filing of false credit reports constituted new grounds of

relief t hat arose subsequent to the adjudication of Murungi’s prior cases. Under this rationale,-2-

Murungi contends that Rule 11 sanctions were improperly imposed

. Murungi also asserts that the

magistrate judge erred in denying his motion to amend his complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and hold that the district

court neither erred in dismissing Murungi’s complaint as barred by r es judicata

, nor abused its

discretion in imposing Rule 11 sanctions. S ee Mowbray v. Cameron County, Tex. , 274 F.3d 269,

281 (5th Cir. 2001); Krim v. BancTexas Group, Inc.

, 99 F.3d 775, 777 (5th Cir. 1996). Furthermore,

the magistrate judge’s denial without prejudice of Murungi’s motion to amend his complaint did not

constitute an abuse of discretion. S ee McKinney v. Irving Indep. Sch. Dist.

, 309 F.3d 308, 312 (5th

Cir. 2002), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 2003 WL 162789 (Feb. 24, 2003).

The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
943 A.2d 262

#### Appeal of: K.A.P., Jr., a minor.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 3, 2008.

Decided March 24, 2008.

Tina M. Fryling, Joseph Paul Burt, Erie, for K.A.P., Jr.

Calvin Royer Koons, Harrisburg, for Office of the Attorney General.

Matthew James McLaughlin, Erie, for County of Erie.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-216-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Revised Tariff Sheets

February 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on January 29, 2001, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised sheets, to be effective 
March 1, 2001:

Second Revised Sheet No. 46
Third Revised Sheet No. 134
Third Revised Sheet No. 98A
Third Revised Sheet No. 135
Original Sheet No. 98B
Original Sheet No. 135A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 132
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 136
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 133
First Revised Sheet No. 164

    Southern proposes to revise its tariff to remove the historical 
restriction on its Rate Schedule FT-NN (Firm Transportation--No Notice) 
service so that any customer can contract for no-notice service if it 
is available either from Southern or an FT-NN contract holder. Of 
particular importance is the fact that this will allow shippers to 
acquire FT-NN service through capacity release and utilize it on a no-
notice basis pursuant to the terms of Rate Schedule FT-NN instead of 
having to nominate the service.
    In order to facilitate this change, Southern also proposes to 
revise its allocation procedures and offer a fifth predetermined 
allocation (PDA) method called Operator Provided Value (OPV). The OPV 
allocation method is a recognized GISB standard that is optional for 
pipelines to offer.
    Southern states that copies of this filing have been served on all 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a part must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://
www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3427 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MICHAEL SWANN, * No. 13-928V

* Special Master Moran

Petitioner, *

* Filed: December 30, 2014

v. *

* Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * in the amount to which

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * respondent does not object.

*

Respondent. * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Maximillian Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner;

Ann Martin, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

On December 23, 2014, respondent filed a stipulation of fact concerning 

final attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, petitioner 

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent 

for review. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections 

to certain items. Based on subsequent discussions, petitioner amended his

application to request $28,589.87, an amount to which respondent does not object. 

The Court awards this amount.

On November 22, 2013, Michael Swann filed a petition for compensation

alleging that the influenza (“flu”), diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”), 

Hepatitis A (“Hep A”), Hepatitis B (“Hep B”), and/or varicella vaccines, which he 

received on November 26, 2010, and February 15, 2012, caused him to suffer 

Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”). Petitioner received compensation based upon 

the parties’ stipulation. Decision, filed Nov. 21, 2014. Because petitioner received 

 

1

The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

compensation, he is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-15(e). 

Petitioner seeks a total of $28,589.87 in attorneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states 

that he incurred no out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this claim. 

Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs. 

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $28,589.87 in the form of a check made payable to 

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Maximillian J. Muller, for 

attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this 

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-

6353.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,175
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,458
<PP&E>                                         199,386
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 810,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          650,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,666
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   810,920
<SALES>                                         61,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,602
<CGS>                                           24,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  329,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (329,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (329,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from form
10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 1998 and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        1,752,185
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    31,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     370,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,385,530
<PP&E>                                        6,829,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,813,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               13,893,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,449,799<F1>
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         2,137,143<F2>
<PREFERRED>                                   1,702,983
<COMMON>                                        124,577
<OTHER-SE>                                   36,704,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 13,893,372
<SALES>                                         162,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                193,729
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,704,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              644,763<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3,025,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3,025,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.23)
        

<FN>
<F1>
Current liabilities include current maturities of long-term debt-stockholders of
which  $1,495,000  due  January 2,  1999,  as  amended,  is due to  officers  or
directors.
<F2> 
Represents balance of Series B 7% Convertible Preferred Stock, net of
unamortized discount of $62,857. 
<F3> 
Interest expense includes $497,603 of amortization of debt discount and
expenses, a non cash item.
</FN>

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6384

JOE DAVID BARNARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GREENVILLE FAMILY COURT; AMY C. SUTHERLAND, Chief Administrative Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-3427-8-20BI) Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 6, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joe David Barnard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Joe David Barnard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeBarnard v. Greenville Family Court , No. CA-03- 3427-8-20BI (D.S.C. Nov. 26, 2003). We deny Barnard’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED