alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Management Agreement - Centaurus Limited dated December 13, 2005



 Exhibit 10.6 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment is made as of December 13, 2005 to that certain Management
Agreement made as of December 13, 2004 by and between Franklin Electronic Publishers, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, with principal place of business at One Franklin Plaza, Burlington, New Jersey 08016-4907 (“Franklin” or “the
Company”) and Centaurus Limited, a Hong Kong company, with principal place of business at 3005 Universal Trade Centre, 3 Arbuthnot Rd. Central, Hong Kong SAR (“Centaurus”), as amended on June 13, 2005 (the “Agreement”). The
parties wish to extend the Term of the Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment and therefore agree as follows: 
 1. Extension of
the Term and Management Work: The Term of the Agreement is hereby extended to run from December 13, 2005 to December 31, 2006 subject to Franklin’s decision to enter into an employment relationship with Baile on terms acceptable to Franklin and
Baile. The Management Work to be performed by Baile during the extension of the Term shall be as directed by Barry Lipsky, President of Franklin. During the Term, Baile shall be eligible to receive a bonus under the Company’s Bonus Plan.

 2. Increase in Payments: Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is modified as follows: During the extension of the Term as set forth above, Franklin agrees to pay
to Centaurus the sum of US$18,000 per month for its acceptable performance of Management Work. 
 3. General: This Amendment is the entire agreement relating
to the matters set forth herein. Capitalized terms as used herein shall have the same meanings as used in the Agreement. All provisions of the Agreement not modified or abrogated hereby shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth below. 
  

			
	 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC PUBLISHERS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Barry Lipsky

		 	 Barry J. Lipsky, President

	 Date:
	 	 December 13, 2005

	
	 CENTAURUS LIMITED

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Matthew Baile

	 Its:
	 	 Matthew Baile, Managing Director

	 Date:
	 	 December 13, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60210

Summary Calendar

TETRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Petitioners

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, US

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; KEVIN W. MCCLENDON,

Respondents

Petition for Review of a Decision

and Order of the Benefits Review Board

BRB No. 09-0601

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Tetra Technologies, Inc. and its insurance carrier appeal the award of

temporary total disability benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’

Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., to an employee who was injured in a

workplace accident. Following a formal hearing, an Administrative Law Judge

issued detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law that were affirmed by the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 31, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60210 Document: 00511366400 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2011
No. 10-60210

Benefits Review Board in a careful opinion. Petitioners argue that the ALJ’s

factual findings were not supported by substantial evidence and that the ALJ

used the wrong statutory provision to calculate the employee’s average weekly

wage. Finding no error, we AFFIRM essentially for the reasons given by the

Benefits Review Board.

2

Case: 10-60210 Document: 00511366400 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/31/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41098

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO GARCIA-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-324-1

Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro GarciaGarcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 18, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41098 Document: 00512277814 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
No. 12-41098

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-41098 Document: 00512277814 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
Exhibit 21



G&L Realty Corp.

List of Subsidiaries

March 31, 2005



|1. | G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | 435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | G&L Grabel San Pedro, LLC
|-- | -------------------------



|4. | G&L Holy Cross, LLC
|-- | -------------------



|5. | G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------



|6. | G&L Tustin, LLC
|-- | ---------------



|7. | G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



|8. | G&L Valencia, LLC
|-- | -----------------



|9. | G&L Lyons, LLC
|-- | --------------



|10. | G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
|--- | ------------------------



|11. | Lakeview Associates, LLC
|--- | ------------------------



|12. | Tustin Heritage Place, LLC
|--- | --------------------------



|13. | G&L Tustin II, LLC
|--- | ------------------



|14. | G&L Tustin III, LLC
|--- | -------------------



|15. | G&L Senior Care Partnership, L.P.
|--- | ---------------------------------



|16. | GLR/Yorba Linda, LLC
|--- | --------------------



|17. | 405 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------



|18. | 415 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------



|19. | 416 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------



|20. | 435 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------



|21. | G&L 436 Bedford, LLC
|--- | --------------------



|22. | G&L Sherman Oaks, LLC
|--- | ---------------------



|23. | G&L 4150 Regents, LLC
|--- | ---------------------



|24. | Paradigm Housing, LLC
|--- | ---------------------
Exhibit 99

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To
the Board of Directors and Shareholders
West Suburban Bancorp, Inc.

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, of changes in shareholders' equity, and of cash flows of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (the 'Company') for the year ended December 31,
1998. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit.

We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1998 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



Chicago,
Illinois
January 29, 1999

---
946 A.2d 681

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Stacy Sue HERSHBERGER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 8, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2008, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court with the direction to REMAND to the Court of Common Pleas of Bedford County for evidentiary hearings, if necessary, to determine the responsibility for the absence of transcripts from the record certified for appeal. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to the failure of Appellant to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the October 24, 2006 order of the Superior Court shall be *572reinstated. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to court personnel, the Superior Court shall resolve on the merits the issues raised in the appeal, which were previously treated as waived. *See Commonwealth v. Barge,*560 Pa. 179, 743 A.2d 429 (1999). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3810]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. GT01-11-000]

PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of Refund 
Report

February 9, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 5, 2000, PG&E Gas Transmission, 
Northwest Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing a Refund Report.
    GTN states that this filing reports GTN's refund of revenues 
collected under its Competitive Equalization Surcharge mechanism, in 
compliance with Section 35 of GTN's FERC Gas Tariff.
    GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
all affected customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before February 15, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.20001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3810 Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Lester B. THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Aniceto De La Puerta DOMINGUEZ; Melvin Wright; Donna Coalston, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-50618

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2011.

Lester B. Thompson, Teague, TX, pro se.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lester B. Thompson, Jr., Texas prisoner # 766928, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Thompson’s motion to proceed IFP is construed as a challenge to the district court’s certification that the appeal is frivolous. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). This court asks only whether the appeal involves legal points that are not frivolous. *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983).

Thompson alleges that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious *861medical needs because they knew he was in pain and at risk of serious injury because of an ankle injury but allowed him to be removed from work restriction. A plaintiff states a cause of action under the Eighth Amendment when he alleges that a defendant has, with deliberate indifference, exposed him to a sufficiently substantial risk of serious damage to his future health. *Burleson v. Texas Dep’t of Criminal Justice,*393 F.3d 577, 589 (5th Cir.2004). “Deliberate indifference encompasses only unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain repugnant to the conscience of mankind.” *McCormick v. Stalder,*105 F.3d 1059, 1061 (5th Cir.1997) (citation omitted). Nothing in Thompson’s allegations, either in the district court or on appeal, suggests that the prison officials wantonly inflicted pain on him in their response to his injury.

Thompson has failed to show that his proposed appeal involves any nonfrivolous issue. *See Howard,*707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, his IFP motion is denied. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n. 24. Because his appeal is frivolous, *see Howard,*707 F.2d at 219-20, his appeal is dismissed. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal in the district court and the dismissal of this appeal both count as strikes under Section 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir.1996). Thompson is warned that if he accumulates a third strike under Section 1915(g) he will not be allowed to proceed IFP in any civil action while incarcerated or detained unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          975392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 12921331
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1848108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              16201732
<PP&E>                                       134261334
<DEPRECIATION>                                41661989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               148184365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12891691
<BONDS>                                       25556160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      43379265
<OTHER-SE>                                    46008453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 148184365
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              43125545
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 28900001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              786742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               18583308
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6954880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           11278975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  11278975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.864
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                             
                                                                   
<ARTICLE>      5

                                                                   
<S>                             <C>                                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                    240,787
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             149,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                5,000
<INVENTORY>                               467,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          923,128
<PP&E>                                     29,716
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,113,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     185,597
<BONDS>                                   203,000
<COMMON>                                      403
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,113,701
<SALES>                                   288,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          288,692
<CGS>                                     180,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             180,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          158,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (50,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (50,628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.03)
                                         
                                                     

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Focus

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         April 3, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                              ( print page 10506)    

*Place:*                         Natcher Building, Room 5As.25, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         John R. Lymangrover, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., Room 5As25N, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 8, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-3816  Filed 2-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Douglas 

instance NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Parraguirre 

cc: Kamario Mantrell Smith 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the 

procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1996 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1996

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to strengthen the restrictions 
 on the overhaul, repair, and maintenance of naval vessels in foreign 
                               shipyards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1993

  Mr. Cunningham (for himself, Ms. Schenk, Mr. Hunter, Ms. Furse, Mr. 
 Packard, Mr. Filner, and Mrs. Bentley) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to strengthen the restrictions 
 on the overhaul, repair, and maintenance of naval vessels in foreign 
                               shipyards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OVERHAUL, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVAL VESSELS IN 
              FOREIGN SHIPYARDS.

    (a) Extension of Restrictions.--Section 7309(c)(1) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by striking out ``the homeport of which 
is in the United States''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall not 
apply with respect to the overhaul, repair, or maintenance of a vessel 
for which work was begun before the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```