alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-1011-001]

Take notice that on February 7, 2001, Redbud Energy LP (Redbud) tendered for filing a revised Electric Rate Tariff FERC No. 1 submitted in connection with its January 19, 2001 filing seeking market rate authority. The revisions are in compliance with the requirements of Order No. 614.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before February 28, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4346  Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Ridge Micro-Energy, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Meriwether, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:May 20, 2008By:/s/Mark L. MeriwetherMark L. Meriwether, President and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          22,643
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          23,363
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,128,697
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,309,994
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         3,307,689
<LOANS>                                      4,236,624
<ALLOWANCE>                                     21,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,047,562
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,062,359
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,354,600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             205,236
<LONG-TERM>                                     919,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                      65,005
<COMMON>                                        199,704
<OTHER-SE>                                      241,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                9,047,562
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 222,700
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               265,059
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  1,252
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                489,011
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              184,633
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              356,010
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           133,001
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  98,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  65,694
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       43,253
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (1,452)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     41,801
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     1.99
<LOANS-NON>                                      10,878
<LOANS-PAST>                                      7,781
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     56
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 21,757
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      (601)
<RECOVERIES>                                         15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                21,471
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          18,816
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of County Bank Corp on form 10-Q
      for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Joseph H. Black,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (4)   The Information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

      /s/ Joseph H. Black
      -------------------------------------
      Joseph H. Black
      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
      August 12, 2005

      I, Susanne Dickey, Assistant Financial Officer of the Company, concur with
      the above statement.

      /s/ Susanne Dickey
      ---------------------------
      Susanne Dickey
      Assistant Financial Officer
      August 12, 2005

                                                                              16
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

OSWALDO ZUNIGA-SANCHEZ, a.k.a.

Oswaldo Sanchez,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30028

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00023-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017** 

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Oswaldo Zuniga-Sanchez appeals pro se from the district court’s order

granting in part Zuniga-Sanchez’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

FEB 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The district court reduced Zuniga-Sanchez’s sentence to 120 months, which

reflects the mandatory minimum for his offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). 

Zuniga-Sanchez contends that he is entitled to a further reduction. We review de

novo a district court’s refusal to depart below the mandatory minimum. See United

States v. Sykes, 658 F.3d 1140, 1144 (9th Cir. 2011). Because the mandatory

minimum applies in section 3582(c)(2) proceedings, the district court correctly

concluded that it could not reduce Zuniga-Sanchez’s sentence any further than it

did. See Sykes, 658 F.3d at 1148. 

Zuniga-Sanchez’s challenge to the district court’s denial of safety valve

relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) is not cognizable in this proceeding. See Dillon v.

United States, 560 U.S. 817, 831 (2010) (only aspects of the sentence affected by

the amendment may be raised in section 3582(c)(2) proceedings). 

AFFIRMED.

2 16-30028
941 A.2d 705

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Douglas Richard KENNEDY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 29, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of February, 2008, the order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared Section 3802(c) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(c), unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. *See Commonwealth v. Duda,*592 Pa. 164, 923 A.2d 1138 (2007); *Commonwealth v. Finchio,*592 Pa. 577, 926 A.2d 968 (2007). The Commonwealth’s Petition to Remand Record is dismissed as moot.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 10658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3962]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-255; MM Docket No. 00-123; RM-9903]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Rincon, PR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; denial.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission denies the request of Ocean Communications to 
allot Channel 300B to Rincon, PR, as its first local aural service. See 
65 FR 44507, July 18, 2000. The proposed transmitter site is located 
within the Desecheo National Wildlife Refuge and the Fish and Wildlife 
Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, has stated that it is 
unlikely that it would favorably consider a request to erect a tower 
there.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-123, adopted January 24, 2001, and 
released February 2, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-3962 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,706
<PP&E>                                          37,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,762
<BONDS>                                         20,861
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,271
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,477
<SALES>                                        228,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,750
<CGS>                                          196,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,331
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        




</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto HERNANDEZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-6317.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

Gilberto Hernandez-Chavez, Appellant Pro Se. Felice McConnell Corpening, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In 2008 and 2009, Gilberto Hernandez-Chavez was convicted of drug and firearm offenses and sentenced to a total of 120 months’ imprisonment. He did not appeal. Years later, he moved in the district court to dismiss the indictment underlying these convictions for lack of jurisdiction. The district court summarily denied the motion, and Hernandez-Chavez appeals. Upon review, we affirm this decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts arid legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*198terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

**AUSTIN**HOE. Charles I:.Theobsld, ?a@~ 2.

those uxpressly or aplledly oonierred upon them by law, - that is, by tficcorM.itutbon and etatutere

### or the state." (Tax. CTur.,Vol. il, SOC. 37, p.p. 564- **565.)**

*The jurisdiotion 

### of Com&mlonere* Court6 ia llxnIted.to strictly *county buslnese,* and the legislature has no authmity to enlarge their power8 or jurlIadiotion. Any attei-flto ootier upon the oourt jurlsdlotica or a mtter which la not *county **badness*** **i8void+*r*~** **crer. Jllr.,**  **To& u,**  

## pap***film-566).** 

## Attvbr

**a nioat**  **earetul** and 

### oxlaa~tiYe **utudy of**  **:thh ~:quaubloll**  **lm hat.**  **beaa unable**  **to find**  **any amlorl~**  

## ~ty,,:+zipreu

~1: lmplled,

nbiah w o u l d l 

## uttmr3.m

She~eotitbr rraaiirdmera

of QalYeatal

ootmty, Texasto expend momy r0r?

ths,payrnmt

0r 

## ur0-g~~~~ we arewiabx0 fo &Y.ssdwsy

authority

uhlsih would al.aaaiSy

th% a.pub if\pg:.u

l a o u a t y b ud n o uî* .. -I L -_ .:. .y 

## Tlwrsfore,

+ti a r e r eup e o t@il .l y

advised, 

### that **At Air**  **thu opinion**  

### or **thh do-t**  **that th6**  **cwulttr** uculauulma8~‘uourt **of QdLneton,**  **Teru do.&**  **not haqo**  asithbrlty **to employ**  **llfetgardu** 

## Sor the**.Uamwstar b.a@i**  land **pay moh**  **3Uequards for**  **their -somleeu**  -at **al O~guIq**  **fund&**
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ian Ralph BLACKSTOCK, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-8546.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 10, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 20, 2010.

Ian Ralph Blackstock, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ian Ralph Blackstock seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district *728court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 478, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see MillerEl v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Blackstock has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 1.2
 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF THE
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
 TEEKAY SHIPPING CORPORATION
 UNDER SECTION 90 OF THE BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
  1.
    
    The name of the Corporation is: TEEKAY SHIPPING CORPORATION.
 2.
    
    The Articles of Incorporation were filed in the Republic of Liberia on
February 9, 1979 and redomiciled to the Republic of the Marshall Islands on December
20, 1999. Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation were filed on the
6th day of June, 2006.3.
    
    Section (a) of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended as follows:
  4.
    
    This amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was authorized by vote of the
holders of a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon at a meeting
of shareholders held on 29th May 2007.
 th
 Arthur BenslerSecretary
Exhibit 10.5


    EXHIBIT
      10.5

     

    Schedule
      Prepared in Accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation
      S-K

    


    The
      Warrants dated May 25, 2006 are substantially identical in all material respects
      except as to the warrantholder and the number of shares for which warrant can
      be
      exercised.

    


    
      	
              Holder

            	 	 	
              Shares
                for which Warrant can be Exercised

            	 
	
              Dolphin
                Offshore Partners, L.P.

            	 	 	
              20,833

            	 
	
              Radcliffe
                SPC, Ltd. for and on behalf of the Class A Convertible Crossover
                Segregated Portfolio

            	 	 	
              486,111

            	 
	
              LBI
                Group, Inc.

            	 	 	
              347,222

            	 
	
              Kamunting
                Street Master Fund, Ltd.

            	 	 	
              243,056

            	 
	
              Tribeca
                Global Convertible Investments Limited

            	 	 	
              173,611

            	 
	
              Capital
                Ventures International

            	 	 	
              208,333

            	 
	
              Evolution
                Master Fund Ltd. SPC, Segregated Portfolio M

            	 	 	
              243,056

            	 
	
              Highbridge
                International, LLC

            	 	 	
              260,417

            	 


    

    


    


    The
      text
      of the Warrants is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Nestor’s
      Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 26, 2006 (at Exhibit B thereto)
New Counties Eligible for CRP Emergency Haying and Grazing Since Last Week

*Before haying and grazing, contact your FSA office to see if your county remains eligible and/or obtain a modified

conservation plan. This list is for the current program year and current local conditions may have changed. Counties eligible

prior to October 1 of 2023 may be eligible for grazing or haying but any days utilized after the start of October 1, 2023 will count

towards the total allowable days in 2024.

State Boundary

County Boundary

Previously Approved Emergency Haying and Grazing Counties (No longer in D2)

LFPCounties (Haying Restricted)

Current Approved Emergency Haying and Grazing Counties

Map Created by DAFP/CD/CSB: 4/4/2024 10:24 AM