# Patent

## Title
Metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol

## Abstract

A metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol is provided. The metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol. The invention also provides a method for producing the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium, a method for producing ethanol with the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium, and a method for screening of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains for the presence of NADPH-dependent native alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 14/305,781, filed Jun. 16, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,127,297, which claims the priority of the U.S. provisional application No. 61/835,086 filed on Jun. 14, 2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.


REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING
This application contains a sequence listing comprising 83 sequences, submitted by EFS-Web, thereby satisfying the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §§1.821-1.825. The sequence listing file, named “ADH_US_Seq_listing.txt”, was created on Jun. 12, 2014, and is 487 kb in size.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the metabolic enhancement of cyanobacteria to produce ethanol. In particular, the present invention relates to alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes that can be useful in metabolically enhancing cyanobacteria for ethanol production.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Various chemical compounds of interest, such as biofuels, can be produced via metabolically enhanced cyanobacteria. One of these compounds is ethanol. In this context, the PCT patent application WO 2009/098089 A2 discloses the use of ethanologenic genes, for example pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase genes for the production of ethanol with cyanobacteria.
Despite a generally promising concept, the practical implementation of ethanol production with metabolically enhanced cyanobacteria still faces critical problems which have made it so far difficult to achieve economical production rates per production volume and area.
Therefore, there is a need for improved cyanobacterial cells which reduce or resolve at least some of these problems.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This task is solved by providing a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol, comprising at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol, wherein (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and (ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than 0.08·10−3 M.
This task is also solved by providing a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol, comprising at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol, wherein (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and (ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 0.65·10−3 M but lower than 10·10−3 M, and (iii) the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 20·10−3 M.
This task is further solved by providing a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol, comprising at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol, wherein the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8, SEQ ID NO: 9, or SEQ ID NO: 10.
This invention also provides method for producing the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol, comprising the method steps of: A) providing a cyanobacterial cell, B) introducing the at least one recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the at least one recombinant gene encoding the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme into the wild type host cell, wherein (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and (ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than 0.08·10−3 M, or the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 0.65·10−3 M but lower than 10·10−3 M, and the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 20·10−3 M.
Further provided is a method for producing ethanol, comprising the method steps of: a) providing the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol, b) culturing the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell in a growth medium under the exposure of light, the cyanobacterial cell producing ethanol while being cultured, c) retrieving the ethanol from the cyanobacterial cell, the growth medium and/or a headspace above the growth medium.
This invention also provides an isolated nucleic acid sequence, comprising at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh), wherein the recombinant gene comprises a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 15, SEQ ID NO: 16 or SEQ ID NO: 17, and wherein (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and (ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than 0.08·10−3 M.
This invention further provides an isolated nucleic acid sequence, comprising at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh), wherein the recombinant gene comprises a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 18, SEQ ID NO: 19, SEQ ID NO: 20 or SEQ ID NO: 22, at least 92% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 23, or at least 98% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 24, and wherein (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and (ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 0.65·10−3 M but lower than 10·10−3 M, and (iii) the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M.
Also provided is a use of a metabolically enhanced host cell for the production of a C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 alcohol, comprising at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting a C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde into the corresponding alcohol, wherein the Michaelis constant Km for the C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than 0.2·10−3 M.
This invention further provides a method for screening a plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains for the presence of NADPH-dependent native alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes, comprising the following steps: A1) preparing a first and a second sample from each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains, A2) adding acetaldehyde to the first and second sample from each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains, A3) keeping the first sample from each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains under illumination and the second sample without illumination, A4) comparing the conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol in the first and second sample from each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains, A5) selecting cyanobacterial strains having a higher acetaldehyde conversion rate under illumination than without illumination for further characterization.
Additionally, this invention provides a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol, comprising: at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol, wherein said Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) is from an organism selected from the group consisting of Arthrospira platensis, Arthronema africanum, Synechococcus sp., Chroococcidiopsis sp., Lyngbya sp. and Cyanothece sp.
In another embodiment, a method of determining the Km of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (forward reaction) in a microbial strain is provided, by culturing the strain and preparing a crude extract, clarifying the crude extract, mixing an aliquot of the clarified crude extract with the buffer: 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, and 1 mM DTT at 30° C., adding 0.15 mM NADPH, starting the reaction by adding acetaldehyde in an amount from about 1 μM to about 50 μM, measuring NADPH oxidation at a wavelength of 340 nm at 30° C., and correlating the NADPH oxidation measurement with a graph of known Km values to determine a Km value (forward) for the alcohol dehydrogenase.
In an embodiment, a method of determining the Km of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (back reaction) in a microbial strain is provided, by culturing the microbial strain, preparing a crude extract from the culture, clarifying the crude extract, mixing an aliquot of the clarified crude extract with the buffer: 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, and 1 mM DTT at 30° C., adding 0.15 mM NADP+, starting the reaction by adding ethanol in an amount from about 1 mM to about 2.5M, measuring the change in NADP+ at a wavelength of 340 nm at 30° C., and correlating the change in NADP+ with a graph of known Km values to determine a Km value (back reaction) for the alcohol dehydrogenase.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1A and 1B show exemplary graphical plots of the kinetic analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme with amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 1 from which the Michaelis constants Km for acetaldehyde (FIG. 1A) and ethanol (FIG. 1B) of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme were computed using the GraphPad Prism software.
FIGS. 2A and 2B show exemplary graphical plots of the kinetic analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme with amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 2 from which the Michaelis constants Km for acetaldehyde (FIG. 2A) and ethanol (FIG. 2B) of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme were computed using the GraphPad Prism software.
FIG. 3A is a map of plasmid construct TK293 with SEQ ID NO: 27 containing the PrpsL promoter upstream of a codon improved synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26 and the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene.
FIG. 3B is a map of plasmid construct #1646 with SEQ ID NO: 28. #1646 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized ribosome binding site (RBS) upstream of a codon improved adh gene from Lyngbya sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1.
FIG. 4A is a map of plasmid construct #1652 with SEQ ID NO: 29. #1652 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PrpsL promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved adh gene from Lyngbya sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1.
FIG. 4B is a map of plasmid construct #1658 with SEQ ID NO: 30. #1658 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26.
FIG. 5A is a map of plasmid construct #1684 with SEQ ID NO: 31. #1684 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved adh gene from Lyngbya sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1.
FIG. 5B is a map of plasmid construct #1754 with SEQ ID NO: 32. #1754 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved adh gene from Arthrospira platensis encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2.
FIG. 6A is a map of plasmid construct #1760 with SEQ ID NO: 33. #1760 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PrpsL promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved adh gene from Arthrospira platensis encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2.
FIG. 6B is a map of plasmid construct #1578 with SEQ ID NO: 34. #1578 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of the synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26.
FIG. 7 is a map of plasmid construct #1749 with SEQ ID NO: 35. #1749 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and a modified PrpsL promoter upstream of the synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26.
FIGS. 8A, 8B and 8C show a graphical evaluation of acetaldehyde accumulation (FIG. 8A) and absolute (FIG. 8B) as well as relative ethanol production rates (FIG. 8C) determined by the GC vial online method for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the different ethanologenic plasmids #1578, #1646 and #1753 over 40 hours cultivation under inducing conditions.
FIGS. 9A, 9B and 9C show a graphical evaluation of acetaldehyde accumulation (FIG. 9A) and absolute (FIG. 9B) as well as relative (FIG. 9C) ethanol production rates determined by the GC vial online method for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the different ethanologenic plasmids #1578, #1754 and #1735 over 40 hours cultivation under inducing conditions.
FIGS. 10A and 10B show a graphical evaluation of Adh activity levels (FIG. 10A) and acetaldehyde/ethanol ratios (FIG. 10B) determined by the GC vial online method for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the different ethanologenic plasmids #1578, #1646, #1753, #1754 and #1735 under inducing conditions.
FIGS. 11A and 11B show a graphical evaluation of cell growth and (FIG. 11A) total ethanol accumulation (FIG. 11B) over 30 days cultivation for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1658 and #1684 under inducing conditions.
FIG. 11C shows a graphical evaluation of normalized ethanol accumulation per cell density over 30 days cultivation for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1658 and #1684 under inducing conditions.
FIGS. 12A and 12B show a graphical evaluation of Pdc (FIG. 12A) and Adh (FIG. 12B) activity over 30 days cultivation for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1658 and #1684 under inducing conditions.
FIGS. 13A and 13B show a graphical evaluation of cell growth (FIG. 13A) and total ethanol accumulation (FIG. 13B) over 21 days cultivation for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1578 and #1760 under inducing conditions.
FIG. 13C shows a graphical evaluation of normalized ethanol accumulation per cell density over 21 days cultivation for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1578 and #1760 under inducing conditions.
FIGS. 14A and 14B show a graphical evaluation of Pdc (FIG. 14A) and Adh (FIG. 14B) activity over 21 days cultivation for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1578 and #1760 under inducing conditions.
FIG. 15A shows an exemplary graphical plot of the kinetic analysis of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme with amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 1 from which the Michaelis constant Km for propanal was computed using the GraphPad Prism software.
FIG. 15B shows the results of an Adh specific activity comparison in μmol per mg protein and min of the alcohol dehydrogenase with amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 1 for a variety of different C2-C10 aldehyde substrates at 0.1 mM substrate concentration.
FIGS. 16A and 16B show the results of relative phycocyanin (PC)/chlorophyll (Chl) (FIG. 16A) and relative carotenoid (Car)/phycocyanin (PC) pigmentation (FIG. 16B) analysis of various metabolically enhanced Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 harboring different ethanologenic plasmids under inducing conditions in comparison to the wild type Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311.
FIG. 17A is a map of plasmid construct #1606 with SEQ ID NO: 44. #1606 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26.
FIG. 17B is a map of plasmid construct #1645 with SEQ ID NO: 45. #1645 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved adh gene from Synechococcus sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 6.
FIGS. 18A and 18B show the results of relative ethanol production rates per OD750nm (FIG. 18A) and acetaldehyde/ethanol ratios (FIG. 18B) of various metabolically enhanced Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring different ethanologenic plasmids under inducing conditions in comparison to the wild type Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311.
FIGS. 19A and 19B show the results of Pdc (FIG. 19A) and Adh (FIG. 19B) activity measurements of various metabolically enhanced Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring different ethanologenic plasmids under inducing conditions in comparison to the wild type Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311.
FIG. 20A is a map of plasmid construct #1753 with SEQ ID NO: 46. #1753 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of an adh gene from Lyngbya sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1.
FIG. 20B is a map of plasmid construct #1735 with SEQ ID NO: 47. #1735 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS upstream of an adh gene from Arthrospira platensis encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2.
FIG. 21A is a map of plasmid construct #1790 with SEQ ID NO: 71. #1790 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Arthrospira platensis encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2.
FIG. 21B is a map of plasmid construct #1791 with SEQ ID NO: 72. #1791 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Lyngbya sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1.
FIG. 22A is a map of plasmid construct #1792 with SEQ ID NO: 73. #1792 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of a synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26.
FIG. 22B is a map of plasmid construct #1793 with SEQ ID NO: 74. #1793 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Synechococcus sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 6.
FIG. 23A is a map of plasmid construct #1795 with SEQ ID NO: 75. #1795 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Cyanothece sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 3.
FIG. 23B is a map of plasmid construct #1815 with SEQ ID NO: 76. #1815 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Chroococcidiopsis sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 9.
FIG. 24A is a map of plasmid construct #1831 with SEQ ID NO: 77. #1831 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Synechococcus sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 5.
FIG. 24B is a map of plasmid construct #1750 with SEQ ID NO: 78. #1750 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an codon improved adh gene from Lyngbya sp. encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1.
FIG. 25A is a map of plasmid construct #1784 with SEQ ID NO: 79. #1784 is a derivative of TK293 containing the PnirA promoter with optimized RBS upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Synechocystis PCC6803 encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26.
FIG. 25B is a map of plasmid construct #1835 with SEQ ID NO: 80. #1835 is a derivative of TK293 containing the Porf0316 promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Synechocystis PCC6803 encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26.
FIG. 26A is a map of plasmid construct #1938 with SEQ ID NO: 81. #1938 is a derivative of TK293 containing the Porf0316 promoter upstream of a codon improved zmPDC gene and the PcpcB promoter upstream of an adh gene from Lyngbya sp. encoding a codon improved variant of the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1.
FIG. 26B shows a graphical evaluation of normalized ethanol accumulation (% v/v) per cell density over time for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids TK293, #1578, #1792, #1646, #1750 and #1791 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 27A shows a graphical evaluation of aldehyde accumulation (% v/v) over time for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids TK293, #1578, #1792, #1646, #1750 and #1791 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 27B shows a graphical evaluation of Adh activity in μmol per min and mg protein for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids TK293, #1578, #1792, #1646, #1750 and #1791 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 28A shows a graphical evaluation of Adh activity in μmol per min and mg protein for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1578, #1790, #1791, #1792, #1793, and #1795 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 28B shows a graphical evaluation of normalized ethanol accumulation (% v/v) per cell density over time for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1578, #1790, #1791, #1792, #1793, and #1795 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 29A shows a graphical evaluation of acetaldehyde accumulation (% v/v) over time for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1578, #1790, #1791, #1792, #1793, and #1795 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 29B shows a digital image of an agarose gel after electrophoretic analysis of PCR products from specific amplification of the synAdh gene in the plasmid #1784. Lanes V134 and V135: PCR products obtained after recovery of #1784 from different cultivations. Control: PCR products obtained from #1784 before cultivation. The top bold arrow shows the band of the full-length synAdh product. The thin arrows show different smaller sized synAdh amplificates.
FIG. 30A shows a graphical evaluation of cell growth over time of cultures of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1791, #1793, #1835 and #1938 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 30B shows a graphical evaluation of total ethanol production in % v/v (vapour loss-corrected) over cultivation time of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1791, #1793, #1835 and #1938 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 31A shows a graphical evaluation of the chlorophyll/optical density ratio in (mg/L) per OD at 750 nm over cultivation time of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1791, #1793, #1835 and #1938 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 31B shows a graphical evaluation of Adh activity in μmol per mg and min over cultivation time for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1791, #1793, #1835 and #1938 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four replicates.
FIG. 32A shows a digital image of an agarose gel after electrophoretic analysis of PCR products from specific amplification of the synAdh gene in the plasmid #1835. Lanes N671 and N672: PCR products obtained after recovery of #1835 from two independent cultivations of the hybrid harboring #1835. Plate and Cryo: PCR products obtained from the strain harboring #1835 at different stages before cultivations N671 and N672 were inoculated with said strain. Dashed arrows representatively identify bands of specific synAdh amplificates with deletions of about 800 bp and about 400 bp.
FIG. 32B shows a graphical evaluation of total ethanol production in % v/v (vapour loss-corrected) over cultivation time of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the ethanologenic plasmids TK293, #1790, #1791, #1793 and #1795 under inducing conditions. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of seven or four replicates, respectively.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCES
SEQ ID NO: 1 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Lyngbya sp.
SEQ ID NO: 2 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Arthrospira platensis 
SEQ ID NO: 3 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Cyanothece sp.
SEQ ID NO: 4 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Synechococcus sp.
SEQ ID NO: 5 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Synechococcus sp.
SEQ ID NO: 6 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Synechococcus sp.
SEQ ID NO: 7 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Chroococcidiopsis sp.
SEQ ID NO: 8 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Arthronema africanum 
SEQ ID NO: 9 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Chroococcidiopsis sp.
SEQ ID NO: 10 is an amino acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Cyanobacterium sp.
SEQ ID NO: 11 is an amino acid sequence of an unnamed protein product of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806 identified by Genbank Accession No. CA090817.1
SEQ ID NO: 12 is a nucleic acid sequence of a putative origin of replication from Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 13 is a nucleic acid sequence of a putative replication initiation factor from Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 14 is a nucleic acid sequence of an 6.8 kb endogenous plasmid isolated from Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 15 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Lyngbya sp.
SEQ ID NO: 16 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Arthrospira platensis 
SEQ ID NO: 17 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Cyanothece sp.
SEQ ID NO: 18 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Synechococcus sp.
SEQ ID NO: 19 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Synechococcus sp.
SEQ ID NO: 20 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Synechococcus sp.
SEQ ID NO: 21 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Chroococcidiopsis sp.
SEQ ID NO: 22 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Arthronema africanum 
SEQ ID NO: 23 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Chroococcidiopsis sp.
SEQ ID NO: 24 is a nucleic acid sequence of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Cyanobacterium sp.
SEQ ID NO: 25 is a nucleic acid sequence of an unnamed protein product of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806 identified by Genbank Accession No. CA090817.1
SEQ ID NO: 26 is an amino acid sequence of a state-of-the-art alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803
SEQ ID NO: 27 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid TK293 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)-PrpsL-synADH(opt1)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 28 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1646 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-ADH111(opt)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 29 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1652 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)dsrA-PrpsL*4-ADH111(opt)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 30 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1658 pABIcyanol::PnirA*2-zmPDC(opt3)dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-synADH_oop
SEQ ID NO: 31 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1684 pABIcyanol::PnirA*2-zmPDC(opt3)dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-ADH111(opt)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 32 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1754 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-ADH1694(opt)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 33 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1760 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)dsrA-PrpsL*4-ADH1694(opt)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 34 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1578 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-synADH_oop
SEQ ID NO: 35 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1749 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)dsrA-PrpsL*4-synADH_oop
SEQ ID NO: 36 is a nucleotide sequence of the PcpcB promoter endogenous to Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 37 is a nucleotide sequence of the PpetE promoter endogenous to Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 38 is a nucleotide sequence of the zinc inducible ziaR-PziaA promoter/regulator from Synechocystis PCC6803. The gene encoding the regulator ziaR runs in anti-sense direction to PziaA wherein the ziaR stop codon is tta of nucleotides 11 to 13 and the ziaR start codon is cat of the nucleotides 407 to 409.
SEQ ID NO: 39 is a nucleotide sequence of the zinc-inducible smtA-PsmtA promoter/regulator from Synechococcus PCC 7002. The gene encoding the regulator smtB runs in anti-sense direction to PsmtA wherein the smtB stop codon is tta of nucleotides 67 to 69 and the smtB start codon is cat of the nucleotides 391 to 393.
SEQ ID NO: 40 is a nucleotide sequence of the zinc-inducible aztA-PaztA promoter/regulator from Anabaena PCC 7120. The gene encoding the regulator aztR runs in anti-sense direction to PaztA wherein the aztR stop codon is tca of nucleotides 98 to 100 and the aztR start codon is cat of the nucleotides 506 to 508.
SEQ ID NO: 41 is a nucleotide sequence of the cobalt-inducible corR-PcorT promoter/regulator from Synechocystis PCC6803. The gene encoding the regulator corR runs in anti-sense direction to PcorT wherein the corR stop codon is cta of nucleotides 55 to 57 and the corR start codon is cat of the nucleotides 1165 to 1167.
SEQ ID NO: 42 is a nucleotide sequence of the nickel-responsive nrsS-nrsR-PnrsB promoter/regulator from Synechocystis PCC 6803. The gene encoding the regulator nrsS runs in anti-sense direction to PnrsB wherein the nrsS stop codon is tta of nucleotides 115 to 117 and the nrsS start codon is cat of the nucleotides 1477 to 1479. The gene encoding the regulator nrsR runs in anti-sense direction to PnrsB wherein the nrsR stop codon is tca of nucleotides 1476 to 1478 and the nrsR start codon is cat of the nucleotides 2178 to 2180.
SEQ ID NO: 43 is a nucleotide sequence of the PpetJ promoter endogenous to Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 44 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1606 pABIcyanol-PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)_dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-synADH(opt1)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 45 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1645 pABIcyanol-PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)_dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-ADH916(opt)_ter
SEQ ID NO: 46 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1753 pABIcyanol-PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)_dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-Adh111_ter
SEQ ID NO: 47 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1735 pABIcyanol-PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)_dsrA-Prbc*(optRBS)-Adh1694_ter
SEQ ID NO: 48 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf0128 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 49 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1486 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 50 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3164 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 51 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3293 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 52 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3621 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 53 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3635 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 54 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3858 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 55 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1071 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 56 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1072 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 57 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1074 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 58 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1075 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 59 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1542 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 60 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1823 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 61 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf1824 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 62 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3126 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 63 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3389 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 64 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf0221 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 65 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf0222 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 66 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf0223 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 67 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf0316 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 68 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3232 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 69 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3461 (petJ) of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 70 is a nucleotide sequence of promoter Porf3749 of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 71 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1790 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)_TdsrA-PcpcB-ADH242(opt)_TrbcS
SEQ ID NO: 72 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1791 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)_TdsrA-PcpcB-ADH111(opt)_TrbcS
SEQ ID NO: 73 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1792 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)_TdsrA-PcpcB-synADH(nat)_TrbcS
SEQ ID NO: 74 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1793 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)_TdsrA-PcpcB-ADH916(opt)_TrbcS
SEQ ID NO: 75 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1795 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)_TdsrA-PcpcB-ADH553 (opt)_TrbcS
SEQ ID NO: 76 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1815 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)_TdsrA-PcpcB-ADH1102(nat)_Ter
SEQ ID NO: 77 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1831 pABIcyanol::PnirA-zmPDC(opt1)_TdsrA-PcpcB-ADH213(nat)_Ter
SEQ ID NO: 78 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1750 pABIcyanol-6.8::PnirA-zmPDC(opt3)-TdsrA-PrpsL*4-ADH111(opt)-ter
SEQ ID NO: 79 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1784 pABIcyanol-6.8::PnirA*2-zmPDC(opt3)-TdsrA-PcpcB-synADH-oop
SEQ ID NO: 80 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1835 pABIcyanol-6.8::Porf0316-zmPDC(opt1)-TdsrA-PcpcB-synADH-TrbcS
SEQ ID NO: 81 is a nucleotide sequence of plasmid #1938 pABIcyanol-6.8::Porf0316-zmPDC(opt1)-TdsrA-PcpcB-ADH111(opt)-TrbcS
SEQ ID NO: 82 is a nucleotide sequence of a generalized PcpcB promoter endogenous to Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311
SEQ ID NO: 83 is a nucleotide sequence of a generalized PcpcB promoter with alternative transcriptional start points endogenous to Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The following definitions and explanations are provided to better describe the present invention disclosure and to guide those of ordinary skill in the art in the understanding, interpretation and practice in the present invention. Unless explained otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs.
Cyanobacteria are small, prokaryotic, generally aquatic organisms that can be genetically manipulated to be capable of utilizing light and CO2 to produce compounds of interest, such as biofuels. Cyanobacterial cells are capable of fixing carbon dioxide as a carbon source for autotrophic growth, and therefore do not require any costly input of organic carbon as a growth substrate. Furthermore, the CO2 that is utilized by the cyanobacterial culture can be derived from any source, such as a waste byproduct of industrial production. In this way, cyanobacteria can be used to recycle CO2 to desired products, such as biofuels.
The term “Cyanobacterium sp.” means an unspecified cyanobacterial member of the genus Cyanobacterium, which was among other characterized by Rippka and Cohen-Bazire (Ann. Microbiol. (Inst. Pasteur), 1983, 134B:32).
As used herein the term “metabolically enhanced” refers to any change in the endogenous genome of a wild type host cell, or to the addition of endogenous and non-endogenous, exogenous genetic code to a wild type host cell, for example a wild type cyanobacterial cell. One example is the introduction of a heterologous gene. In particular, such changes are made by the hand of man through the use of recombinant DNA technology or mutagenesis. The changes can involve protein coding sequences and/or non-protein coding sequences in the genome such as regulatory sequences, non-coding RNA, antisense RNA, promoters or enhancers. Aspects of the invention utilize techniques and methods common to the fields of molecular biology, microbiology and cell culture. Useful laboratory references for these types of methodologies are readily available to those skilled in the art, see for example “Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual” (3rd edition), Sambrook, J. et al. (2001) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; “Current Protocols in Microbiology” (2007) edited by Coico, R. et al., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; “The Molecular Biology of Cyanobacteria” (1994), Donald Bryant (Ed.), Springer Netherlands; “Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Biotechnology and Applied Phycology” (2003) Richmond, A. (Ed.), Blackwell Publishing; and “The Cyanobacteria, Molecular Biology, Genomics and Evolution”, edited by Antonia Herrero and Enrique Flores, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, 2008.
Various cyanobacterial species have been metabolically enhanced to produce compounds of interest. The transformation of the cyanobacterial genus Synechococcus with genes that encode enzymes that can produce ethanol for biofuel production has been described (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,699,696 and 6,306,639). The transformation of the cyanobacterial genus Synechocystis has been described, for example, in WO 2009/098089 A2 and in WO 2011/018116 A1.
The Michaelis-Menten model is useful for determining kinetic parameters for enzymatically catalyzed reactions and is well known in the art (Michaelis and Menten, (1913), “Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung,” Biochem. Z. 49, 333-369). It is a model that describes the rate of enzymatic reactions by relating the reaction rate to the concentration of a substrate or substrates.
Km values of ADH enzymes were determined herein by varying concentrations of one substrate only while keeping all other substrates at saturated levels. The kinetic parameters of the ADH enzymes were determined herein on cellular extracts, and not on pure enzyme. Km was determined herein using a nonlinear regression algorithm for the single-substrate version of the Michaelis-Menten model by using GraphPad Prism Software (version 5). The detailed description of the algorithm is available on the world wide web at “graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/curve-fitting/index.htm?reg_kcat.htm”.
As used herein, the Km value was measured according to the method described in Example 4. The Km was measured using a crude cell extract, or a partially clarified extract, in 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT at a temperature of 30° C. For the forward reaction measurement, 0.15 mM NADPH was added, and acetaldehyde was added in differing amounts ranging from 1 μm to 50 mM. The NADPH oxidation was measured at a wavelength of 340 nm. For the back reaction, 0.15 mM NADP+ was added, with ethanol in differing amounts ranging from 1 mM to 2.5 M.
Database entry numbers given in the following are from the NCBI database (National Center for Biotechnology Information; available on the world wide web at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) or from the CyanoBase, the genome database for cyanobacteria (available on the world wide web at bacteria.kazusa.or.jp/cyanobase/index.html); Yazukazu et al. “CyanoBase, the genome database for Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC6803: status for the year 2000”, Nucleic Acid Research, 2000, Vol. 18, page 72.
It is well known to a person of ordinary skill in the art that large plasmids can be produced using techniques such as the ones described in the US patents U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,184 B1 titled “Method for producing nucleic acid polymers” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,750,380 titled “DNA polymerase mediated synthesis of double stranded nucleic acid molecules”, which are hereby incorporated in their entirety.
Denominations of genes are in the following presented in a three letter lower case name followed by a capitalized letter if more than one related gene exists, for example ziaA for the gene encoding a zinc transporting ATPase. The respective protein encoded by that gene is denominated by the same name with the first letter capitalized, such as ZiaA.
Denominations for promoter sequences, which control the transcription of a certain gene in their natural environment are given by a capitalized letter “P” followed by the gene name according to the above described nomenclature, for example “PziaA” for the promoter controlling the transcription of the ziaA gene.
Denominations for enzyme names can be given in a two or three letter code indicating the origin of the enzyme, followed by the above mentioned three letter code for the enzyme itself, such as SynAdh (Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase from Synechocystis PCC6803), ZmPdc (pyruvate decarboxylase from Zymomonas mobilis).
The term “nucleic acid” is intended to include nucleic acid molecules, such as polynucleotides which include an open reading frame encoding a polypeptide, and can further include non-coding regulatory sequence of genes, such as promoters and enhancers as well as non-coding RNAs. In addition, the terms are intended to include one or more genes that are part of a functional operon. In addition, the terms are intended to include a specific gene for a selected purpose. The gene can be endogenous to the host cell or can be recombinantly introduced into the host cell. Likewise, the term “amino acid sequence” is intended to include polypeptides and proteins, such as enzymes. Such amino acid sequences can be endogenous to the host cell or can be recombinantly introduced into the host cell.
The percentage of identity of two nucleic acid sequences or two amino acid sequences, respectively, can be determined using the algorithm of Thompson et al. (ClustalW, 1994, Nucleic Acid Research, 22:4673-4680). A nucleotide sequence or an amino acid sequence can also be used as a so-called query sequence to perform a nucleic acid or amino acid sequence search against public nucleic acid or protein sequence databases in order to, for example, identify further homologous protein sequences and/or nucleic acid sequences which can also be used in embodiments of this invention. In addition, any nucleic acid sequence or protein sequence disclosed in this patent application can also be used as a query sequence in order to identify yet unknown sequences in public databases, which can encode for example new enzymes which could be useful in this invention. Such searches can be performed using the algorithm of Karlin and Altschul (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1990, 87:2264-2268), modified as in Karlin and Altschul (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 1993, 90:5873-5877). Such an algorithm is incorporated in the nblast and xblast programs of Altschul et al. (Journal of Molecular Biology 1990, 215:403-410). Suitable parameters for these database searches with these programs are, for example, a score of 100 and a word length of 12 for BLAST nucleotide searches as performed with the NBLAST program. BLAST protein searches are performed with the XBLAST program with a score of 50 and a word length of 3. Where gaps exist between two sequences, the gapped BLAST is utilized as described in Altschul et al. (Nucleic Acid Research, 1997, 25:3389-3402).
The term “genome” refers to the chromosomal genome as well to extra chromosomal plasmids which are normally present in the wild type cyanobacterium without having performing recombinant DNA technology. For example, cyanobacteria can include at least up to six extrachromosomal plasmids in their wild type form.
The term “terminator” refers to a nucleic acid sequence, which is able to terminate the transcription of an mRNA. The terminators can exert their function in various ways including, but not limited to forming a hairpin structure in the mRNA transcript, which disrupts the mRNA-DNA RNA polymerase complex during transcription or via forming a recognition site for a transcription termination factor. Non-limiting examples are dsrA from E. coli, the oop terminator or the rho terminator.
The first aspect of the invention provides a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol. The metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol. The alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme has

    
    
        (i) a Michaelis constant Km for NADPH which is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and
        (ii) a Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde which is lower than 0.08·10−3 M, preferably lower than 0.07·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 0.06·10−3 M.
    
    


The second aspect of the invention provides a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol. The metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol. The alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme has

    
    
        (i) a Michaelis constant Km for NADPH which is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme,
        (ii) a Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde which is higher than 0.65·10−3 M, higher than 0.7·10−3 M or higher than 0.73·10−3 M, but lower than 10·10−3 M, preferably lower than 9·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 8·10−3 M, and
        (iii) a Michaelis constant Km for ethanol which is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M.
    
    


The third aspect of the invention provides a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol. The metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol. The alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity, more preferably at least 95% sequence identity, or 99% sequence identity, to

    
    
        SEQ ID NO: 1,
        SEQ ID NO: 2,
        SEQ ID NO: 3,
        SEQ ID NO: 4,
        SEQ ID NO: 5,
        SEQ ID NO: 6,
        SEQ ID NO: 7,
        SEQ ID NO: 8,
        SEQ ID NO: 9, or
        SEQ ID NO: 10.
    
    


In the above aspects, the Km-values represent the Km-values of the native, i.e. non-recombinant, form of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. A Km-value as used herein can be determined from the endogenously expressed alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme of a wild-type cyanobacterial cell. For example, a cell extract of the wild-type cyanobacterial cell which includes a minor portion of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme and a major portion which is larger than the minor portion of other proteins can be used for determination of the Km-value of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. A suitable method for determining the Km-value of a native alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme within the meaning of the present invention is described further below in example 4. Accordingly, the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde and the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol shall be understood with NADPH or NADP+, respectively, as co-factor of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme.
Further information with regard to the assignment of the SEQ ID NOs of the present invention to their corresponding strains of origin can be found in the section “BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCES” above.
The inventors of the present invention discovered that the type of Adh enzyme and its specific kinetic properties in terms of its forward reaction, i.e. the reduction of acetaldehyde to ethanol, and its back reaction, i.e. the conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol, are of at least similar importance as its activity level for the ethanol production characteristic and performance of a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell.
On the one hand, a relatively low affinity for acetaldehyde of a recombinant Adh enzyme can lead to a transient acetaldehyde accumulation in the initial phase of the cultivation of a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell. First of all, this causes economically unfavorable production downtimes from the start of the cultivation. Secondly, the acetaldehyde accumulation can cause acetaldehyde-related toxic effects which harm the cyanobacterial cells, leading for example to reduced cell vitality and metabolic turnover, and shortening the total exploitable phase of ethanol production.
On the other hand, a low affinity for the product ethanol of the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase enzyme can be of particular importance. The inventors discovered that conventional alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes often exhibit Michaelis constants Km for ethanol, and in particular combinations of Michaelis constants Km for ethanol and Michaelis constants Km for acetaldehyde, which tend to favor the back reaction from ethanol to acetaldehyde at increasing ethanol concentrations. The observed effect resembles a product inhibition of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme at higher ethanol concentrations which significantly impairs achieving profitable ethanol concentrations with conventional metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells known in the art. As above, a concomitant effect is again the accumulation of acetaldehyde which harms the cyanobacterial cells.
In contrast, by incorporating an Adh enzyme having Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde which is lower than 0.08·10−3 M, preferably lower than 0.07·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 0.06·10−3 M; or having a Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde which is higher than 0.65·10−3 M, higher than 0.7·10−3 M or higher than 0.73·10−3 M but lower than 10·10−3 M, preferably lower than 9·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 8·10−3 M in combination with a Michaelis constant Km for ethanol which is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M, the inventors achieved a metabolic enhancement of a cyanobacterial cell that leads to an enhanced level of ethanol formation due to the fact that the recombinant alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is capable of maintaining a low acetaldehyde level in the culture and/or tolerates high ethanol product concentrations with substantially reduced back-reaction. For at least the same reasons, the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell of the present invention exhibits a higher vitality, maintains a high metabolic turnover during cultivation and achieves a timely extended phase of ethanol production in comparison to conventionally metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells.
The acetaldehyde and/or ethanol that is produced by a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell can be quantified by several methods. In one method, gas chromatography is used, following methods similar to blood alcohol quantification methods, as described in example 7 of the present invention.
A useful indicator of the vitality of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell is, for example, the pigmentation of the cell during or after ethanol production. A reduction in the chlorophyll and/or phycocyanin pigmentation of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell in comparison to the wild type cyanobacterial cell can be an indicator of reduced cell vitality and stress. Another indicator for impaired cell vitality can be a reduction in the phycocyanin/chlorophyll ratio of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell in comparison to the wild type cyanobacterial cell. Reduced cell vitality can also be accompanied by an increased carotenoid/phycocyanin ratio of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell in comparison to the wild type cyanobacterial cell. The relative phycocyanin (PC) pigmentation can be photometrically measured at 620 nm wavelength. The relative chlorophyll (Chl) pigmentation can be photometrically measured at 680 nm wavelength. The relative carotenoid (Car) pigmentation can be photometrically measured in the range of 490 nm (+/−5 nm) wavelength. For example, the reduction in the relative phycocyanin/chlorophyll ratio of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell is less than 25%, preferably less than 20% in comparison to the wild type cyanobacterial cell. In another example, the increment in the relative carotenoid/phycocyanin ratio of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell is less than 100%, preferably less that 50%, most preferred less than 40% in comparison to the wild type cyanobacterial cell. Metabolically enhanced, ethanol-producing cyanobacterial cells exhibiting a relative phycocyanin/chlorophyll ratio and/or a carotenoid/phycocyanin ratio in these ranges are typically less affected by the ethanol production and have a vitality that is closer to that of a corresponding wild type cyanobacterium. 
Furthermore, in many photoautotrophic cells, for example cyanobacterial cells, the level of total NAD+ and NADH to total NADP+ and NADPH is around 1:10. The inventors found that due to this pivotal imbalance of NADH to NADPH, an enhanced level of ethanol formation is achieved with metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells when the recombinant alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme has a Michaelis constant Km for NADPH which is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH, thus having a higher affinity to the co-factor NADP+/NADPH than to the co-factor NAD+/NADH. An alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme having a higher affinity to the co-factor NADP+/NADPH than to the co-factor NAD+/NADH may in the following also be referred to as NADPH-dependent.
The inventors of the present invention developed a powerful forward-genetic screening method to analyze a plurality of wild-type strains, for example several cyanobacterial wild-type strains, for the presence of NADPH-dependent native Adh function of genes in the wild-type strains by analysing the wild-type strains in vivo for the phenotypic effect of acetaldehyde conversion into ethanol in dependence of light. The screening method proceeds in the opposite direction of so-called reverse genetic screens which start from a particular gene and seek to find what phenotype arises from this gene. In contrast, the present screening method does not require prior knowledge of the corresponding Adh-encoding genes and therefore allows particularly fast and cost-efficient discovery of native alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes from a large number of newly isolated and/or uncharacterised candidate strains. This method is also applicable without having any sequence information about the genomic DNA sequence of the candidate strain. The screening method comprises the following steps:

    
    
        A1) preparing a first and a second sample from each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains,
        A2) adding acetaldehyde to the first and second sample from each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains,
        A3) keeping the first sample from each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains under illumination and the second sample without illumination,
        A4) comparing the conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol in the first and second sample of each of the plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains,
        A5) selecting cyanobacterial strains having a higher acetaldehyde conversion rate under illumination than without illumination for further characterization.
    
    


The illumination in method step A3) can be between 50 μE m−2 s−1 and 180 μE m−2 s−1, 80 μE m−2 s−1 and 150 μE m−2 s−1, preferably between 110 μE m−2 s−1 and 130 μE m−2 s−1.
The acetaldehyde conversion into ethanol may, for example, be determined by gas chromatography. For instance, the method described in example 6 of the present invention may be used.
The inventors of the present invention discovered that an enhanced in vivo acetaldehyde conversion into ethanol in the illuminated sample in comparison to the sample without illumination indicates a light-dependent acetaldehyde conversion which is a sign of NADPH-dependent ADH activity in the corresponding alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strain. Accordingly, the method is particularly advantageous to efficiently and economically pre-select candidate cyanobacterial strains prior to performing more detailed ex vivo analyses of Adh activity.
Moreover, after identification and selection of candidate strains which have a higher acetaldehyde conversion rate under illumination than without illumination in step A5), the screening method can be further developed to easily determine important kinetic properties of a plurality of Adh enzymes, such as Km-values for acetaldehyde, NADPH and/or ethanol, by including the following additional steps:

    
    
        A6) preparing cell extracts from the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial selected in step A5),
        A7) contacting each of the cell extracts with a predetermined concentration of acetaldehyde and NADPH, or with a predetermined concentration of ethanol and NADP+,
        A8) detecting conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol or of ethanol into acetaldehyde in each of the cell extracts.
    
    


Typically, each of the cell extracts will contain a minor portion of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme and a major portion of other cellular proteins being larger than the minor portion that are generally present in said alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial cell. For example, the portion of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is typically less than 1% of the cellular proteins. It is therefore a particular advantage of the screening method that a purification of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme from the cell extract is not necessary, resulting in considerable labor and cost savings in comparison to other methods. However, in certain variants, the method step A6) can also further comprise removal of molecules with a molecular size smaller than 1000 Da from the cell extracts, for instance by size exclusion chromatography.
In a further variant of the screening method, the method step A6) further comprises the substep A6′) separating each of the cell extracts into a plurality of portions. In this way, a plurality of measurements can be made with each of the cell extracts. For example, method step A7) can further comprise the substep A7′) contacting the plurality of portions of each of the cell extracts with a plurality of predetermined concentrations of acetaldehyde and NADPH, or with a plurality of predetermined concentrations of ethanol and NADP+. Typically, the plurality of predetermined concentrations comprises a plurality of different concentrations. For example, different concentrations of acetaldehyde can be used together with one concentration of NADPH. In another example, different concentrations of NADPH can be used together with one concentration of acetaldehyde. In a further example, different concentrations of ethanol can be used together with one concentration of NADP+. In this way, a concentration-dependent conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol or of ethanol into acetaldehyde can be obtained. For example, the concentration-dependent conversion can be used in a further method step A9) for deriving the Km-value for acetaldehyde or the Km-value for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme.
The conversion in method step A8) can, for example, be detected as a change in the absorption of the cell extracts over time at a wavelength between 300 nm and 380 nm wavelength, preferably between 320 nm and 360 nm wavelength, most preferred between 330 nm and 350 nm wavelength. At this wavelength range the oxidation of NADPH to NADP+ can be detected as a decrease in absorption, and the reduction of NADP+ to NADPH can be detected as an increase in absorption, respectively, which is proportional to the conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol or of ethanol into acetaldehyde, respectively.
Preferably, the method comprises screening of a plurality of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme expressing cyanobacterial strains for the presence of alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes with a Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde which is lower than 0.08·10−3 M, preferably lower than 0.07·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 0.06·10−3 M; or higher than 0.65·10−3 M, higher than 0.7·10−3 M, or higher than 0.73·10−3 M but lower than 10·10−3 M, preferably lower than 9·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 8·10−3 M; and/or a Michaelis constant Km for ethanol which is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M.
The inventors found that the screening method provides the consistency of results in terms of Adh activity and Km-values that are commensurate to comparison of the screening results from different strains. Accordingly, the inventors were able use the present method for screening of a large number of candidate strains expressing native Adh enzymes for suitable NADPH-dependent Adh enzymes.
The inventors discovered that particularly useful NADPH-dependent Adh enzymes for metabolically enhancing a cyanobacterial cell were typically of a cyanobacterial origin, or variants derived thereof. For example, the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme can comprise an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity or at least 99% sequence identity to an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme of cyanobacterial origin. These Adh enzymes possessed particularly favorable kinetic properties and allowed the inventors to achieve superior ethanol yields when these Adh enzymes were recombinantly expressed in the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium. 
After the initial screening for the alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes having the required Km-values for carrying out the present invention, the Adh-encoding genes and corresponding amino acid sequences were identified and sequenced.
Accordingly, the inventors already identified alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes which exemplarily possess the required features for carrying out the present invention. Specifically, the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity or at least 99% sequence identity to

    
    
        SEQ ID NO: 1,
        SEQ ID NO: 2,
        SEQ ID NO: 3,
        SEQ ID NO: 4,
        SEQ ID NO: 5,
        SEQ ID NO: 6,
        SEQ ID NO: 7,
        SEQ ID NO: 8,
        SEQ ID NO: 9, or
        SEQ ID NO: 10.
    
    


Phylogenetic analysis shows that the above-identified Adh enzymes represent a superior subgroup of the Zn2+-binding GroES-like domain alcohol dehydrogenase phylogenetic family having the required Km values for carrying out the present invention. In a further embodiment of this invention, the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is therefore selected from a subgroup of the Zinc-binding GroES-like domain alcohol dehydrogenases having the required Km values. These enzymes result in a higher ethanol production rate and in addition in a higher growth rate of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells compared to cells containing Adh enzymes from other Adh families, such as AdhI or AdhII from Zymomonas mobilis or Adh enzymes from Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942 or Anabaena sp. 7120. A suitable tool for determining the alcohol dehydrogenase phylogenetic family is, for example, the MultiAlin Multiple sequence alignment program (Corpet, F.: Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering, Nucleic Acids Research 16 (1988), 10881-10890).
In one embodiment, the Adh comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 1 which the inventors initially identified in Lyngbya sp. In another embodiment, the Adh comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 2 which the inventors initially identified in Arthrospira platensis. In another embodiment, the Adh comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 3 which the inventors initially identified in Cyanothece sp. In yet another embodiment the Adh enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 4 which the inventors initially identified in Synechococcus sp. In yet another embodiment the Adh comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 5 which the inventors initially identified in Synechococcus sp. In yet another embodiment the Adh enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 6 which the inventors initially identified in Synechococcus sp. In yet another embodiment the Adh enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 7 which the inventors initially identified in Chroococcidiopsis sp. In yet another embodiment the Adh enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 8 which the inventors initially identified in Arthronema africanum. In yet another embodiment the Adh enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 9 which the inventors initially identified in Chroococcidiopsis sp. In yet another embodiment the Adh enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 10 which the inventors initially identified in Cyanobacterium sp.
In contrast, for example the state-of-the art alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme synAdh from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 does not meet the requirements of the present invention, because, according to the inventors' screening, it has a Km for acetaldehyde of 0.35·10−3 M and a Km for ethanol of 19·10−3 M. Another example of a state-of-the art alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme which does not meet the requirements of the present invention is the alcohol dehydrogenases AdhA from Moorella sp. HUC22-1 which has a Km for acetaldehyde of 10·10−3 M and a Km for ethanol of 40·10−3 M (Inokuma et al.: Characterization of enzymes involved in the ethanol production of Moorella sp. HUC22-1, Arch Microbiol 188 (2007) 37-45). Another example of an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme which the inventors initially identified in the screening but which did not meet the requirements of the present invention is the Adh from LPP having a Km for acetaldehyde of 0.12·10−3 M and a Km for ethanol of 3.6·10−3 M.
Regarding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, the inventors of the present invention found that the ratio of the Michaelis constant Km for the product of the enzymatic reaction, for instance ethanol, and the Michaelis constant Km for the educt of the enzymatic reaction, for instance acetaldehyde, is a particularly valuable indicator for the enzyme's usefulness in the biogenic production of biofuels such as ethanol with metabolically enhanced cyanobacteria. For example, the inventors found that a high Km (ethanol)/Km (acetaldehyde) ratio allows to quickly achieve a low steady state ratio between acetaldehyde and ethanol which is essentially maintained throughout the cultivation. Therefore, in a further embodiment, the ratio of the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol and the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde, Km (ethanol)/Km (acetaldehyde), of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 55, preferably higher than 60, more preferred higher than 80, most preferred higher than 100. In certain embodiments, the ratio Km (ethanol)/Km (acetaldehyde) of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 120, and more preferably higher than 140.
The recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme can be under the transcriptional control of a constitutive promoter. In this way, a certain level of transcription and, therefore, enzymatic activity of the corresponding Adh enzyme can be maintained during the whole period of cultivation. This is, for example, advantageous to maintain continuous conversion of acetaldehyde to ethanol by the cell and avoid harmful accumulation of acetaldehyde in higher amounts. In particular, this is important for the initial phase of ethanol production when the Pdc activity is induced and is strongly increasing.
For example, the constitutive promoter can be endogenous to the cyanobacterial cell. This has the advantage that no recombinant transcription factor has to be present in the host cell. The endogenous promoter is usually well-recognized by the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell without the need to introduce further genetic modifications. Suitable constitutive promoters include, without limitation, the PrpsL promoter (Gene ID: ABICyanol_orf1758), PpsaA promoter (ABICyanol_orf3243), PpsbB (ABICyanol_orf2107), PcpcB promoter (ABICyanol_orf2472), PatpG (ABICyanol_orf1814), PrbcL promoter (ABICyanol_orf1369), PpetE promoter (ABICyanol_orf2417), and variations thereof. Further suitable endogenous constitutive promoters from genes with unknown function exhibiting appropriate transcriptional activity include, without limitation, the promoters of Gene IDs ABICyano_orf1924, ABICyano_orf1997, ABICyano_orf3446, ABICyano_orf0865, ABICyano_orf1919, ABICyano_orf3278, ABICyano_orf1181, ABICyano_orf1627, ABICyano_orf0265 and ABICyano_orf2536, and variants thereof.
In a particularly preferred variant, the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter or a variant thereof, having the general sequence:







(SEQ ID NO: 82)


n151tataaan7Gn216aggagan10ATG


or


 


(SEQ ID NO: 83)


n123cgtaatan21tataaan7Gn98aaataan4Gactaatn4An96agg


 


agan10ATG.






Herein, n stands for a, t, c or g, tataaa corresponds to the −10 region, the capital G represents a transcriptional start point, the second capital G and the capital A denote alternative transcriptional start points, aggaga corresponds to the ribosomal binding site and the capital ATG represents the start codon.
The inventors found that in this preferred variant the promoter guarantees a particularly strong and reliable expression of the adh gene in the cyanobacterial cells of the present invention. In this way, particularly low acetaldehyde accumulation and high ethanol production rates are achieved, while long ethanol production periods can be maintained. At the same time, it was surprisingly discovered that a combination of this preferred promoter with a conventional adh gene, such as the synAdh from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, does not lead to the beneficial effect of high ethanol production and long production periods, because in this combination the cyanobacterial cells tend to suppress the expression of the conventional adh gene by genetic alteration of the adh gene after a few days of cultivation.
In a preferred embodiment, the cyanobacterial cell is capable of producing ethanol for at least 20 days, preferably at least 30 days, most preferred at least 40 days.
In a further preferred embodiment, the cyanobacterial cell has an average ethanol production rate of at least 0.017% (v/v)/day, preferably at least 0.020% (v/v)/day, most preferred at least 0.022% (v/v)/day over a period of at least 30 days. The average ethanol production rate can for example be achieved with illumination at a photon flux density of 230 μE/m−2 s−1. The illumination is preferably provided from one side to a culture of the cyanobacterial cell, for instance one side of a bioreactor in which the cyanobacterial cell is cultured. Furthermore, the illumination is preferably provided in 12 h/12 h day/night cycles.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme is under the transcriptional control of an inducible promoter. In this way, the ethanol production can be decoupled from metabolic pathways of the cell which are essential for growth and proliferation, thereby allowing accumulation of high cell densities in the culture and large amounts of precursor substrates prior to induction of the Pdc and, thus, the ethanol formation. In this way, significantly increased amounts of ethanol can be produced.
In a further variant, the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme are under the transcriptional control of different promoters. For example, the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme can be under the transcriptional control of an inducible promoter and the recombinant gene encoding the first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme can be under the transcriptional control of a constitutive promoter. Preferably, a transcription terminator is present between the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. The separate transcriptional control of both genes and the corresponding translation from separate mRNAs leads to significantly improved ethanol yields with the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell.
In certain other embodiments, the transcription of both the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes are controlled by the same single promoter. For these embodiments, an inducible promoter is preferred. In this way, the conversion of pyruvate into acetaldehyde by action of the pyruvate decarboxylase and the subsequent conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol by action of the alcohol dehydrogenase can be directly coupled. Hence, accumulation of harmful concentrations of the acetaldehyde intermediate is effectively prevented. In certain variants, the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase is arranged upstream of the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme, so that transcription of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene occurs before transcription of the pyruvate decarboxylase gene. In this way, a delay in Adh expression relative to Pdc expression can be avoided and a sufficiently high Adh expression level of Adh can be accomplished, so that transient acetaldehyde accumulation is effectively reduced.
In a further preferred embodiment, at least a first recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme under the transcriptional control of a first inducible promoter and a second recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme under the transcriptional control of a second inducible promoter are present, wherein the first and the second promoter are separately inducible under different conditions. For a more full description of this embodiment, the applicant's international application WO 2013/098262 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The inventors found that the separately inducible Pdc enzymes in combination with the Adh enzymes of the present invention allow maintaining a particularly long ethanol production phase of several weeks with at the same time high average ethanol production rates.
In a further embodiment, the inducible promoter is inducible by a change of a metal-ion concentration. Such a change of metal-ion concentration includes for instance the addition or depletion of certain metal ions. Suitable inducible promoters include, without limitation, the PziaA promoter, the PsmtA promoter, PaztA promoter, the PcorT promoter, the PnrsB promoter, the PpetJ promoter, the Porf0316 promoter, the Porf0221 promoter, the Porf0223 promoter, the Porf3126 promoter, the PmntC promoter, and variations thereof.
The inducible promoter can, for instance, also be a nitrate inducible promoter. Suitable nitrate inducible promoters include, without limitation, the PnirA promoter, the PnrtA promoter, the PnarB promoter, and variations thereof.
Preferably, the inducible promoter is endogenous to the cyanobacterial cell. An endogenous inducible promoter is usually well-recognized by the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell without the need to introduce further genetic modifications.
In some embodiments, the constitutive and/or inducible promoter contains at least one activity-enhancing mutation increasing the expression of the gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme and/or the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme in the cyanobacterial cell in comparison to the native promoter. Such an activity-enhancing mutation can, for example, improve promoter recognition by the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell, tailor or improve the promoter strength and/or its induction conditions such as the required inductor concentration. Suitable genetic modifications of promoters include, for instance, truncated versions of promoters including only a small portion of the native promoter upstream of the transcription start point, such as the region ranging from −35 to the transcription start. Furthermore, nucleotide changes can be introduced into the promoter sequence, for example into the TATA box, the operator sequence and/or the ribosomal binding site (RBS).
In a further embodiment of the invention, at least one of said recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and said recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is integrated into an extrachromosomal plasmid. The extrachromosomal plasmid can, for example, replicate independently from the chromosome of the cyanobacterial cell. Moreover, the extrachromosomal plasmid can be present in a high copy number in the cyanobacterial cell. In this way, a high copy number of the gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and/or the gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme can be present in the cell, in turn leading to high expression rates of the Pdc and/or Adh so that particularly high ethanol production rates can be achieved. The extrachromosomal plasmid preferably contains genes endogenous to the cyanobacterial host cell. For example, the plasmid can be derived from an endogenous plasmid of the cyanobacterial cell.
Alternatively or in addition, at least one of said recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and said recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is integrated into a chromosome. When the cyanobacterial cell is polyploid, the gene integrations can be present in all of the copies of the chromosome, or in some of the copies of the chromosome.
The cyanobacterial cell can be of a variety of suitable genera, including but not limited to genera of the group comprising Synechocystis, Synechococcus, Anabaena, Chroococcidiopsis, Cyanothece, Lyngbya, Phormidium, Nostoc, Spirulina, Arthrospira, Trichodesmium, Leptolyngbya, Plectonema, Myxosarcina, Pleurocapsa, Oscillatoria, Pseudanabaena, Cyanobacterium, Geitlerinema, Euhalothece, Calothrix, Scytonema. 
In more preferred embodiments, the cyanobacterial cell is selected from the group consisting of Cyanobacterium sp., Synechococcus sp. and Synechocystis sp. Suitable strains include, without limitation, Synechococcus sp. PCC7002 and Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. In another embodiment, the cyanobacterial cell is a Cyanobacterium sp. cell.
Further preferred is a Cyanobacterium sp. which can, for instance, withstand about 1 vol % of ethanol in the culture medium for several weeks and is therefore particularly suitable for metabolic enhancement with the highly productive alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes of the present invention. Also preferred is a high temperature and pH tolerance, for example a strain that withstands at 48° C., preferably 50° C. most preferred at least 53° C. to 55° C. for at least 2 hours per day over a time period of at least 7 day. Furthermore, a strain which can also tolerate a wide range of pH values is preferred and can be cultured at a pH between 5.5 to 10, preferably at a pH between 6 to 7.5, most preferred at neutral or slightly alkaline pH of pH 7.5.
Therefore, in particularly preferred embodiments, the cyanobacterial cell is the Algenol Biofuels Inc. proprietary strain Cyanobacterium sp. with the ATCC accession number PTA-13311 that has been deposited with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110 on Nov. 9, 2012. In the following, this strain may also be referred to as ABICyanol.
Cyanobacterium aponinum and Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311, i.e. ABICyanol, are two different organisms of the genus Cyanobacterium sp.
In certain preferred embodiments, the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme and/or the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme is adapted in the codon triplets coding for the amino acids for enhanced translation in the cyanobacterial cell. In particular, the adapted gene has a G+C content of ≦45%, preferably ≦40%, most preferred ≦35%. In addition, the adapted gene has a codon adaptation index (CAI) of ≧0.60, preferably ≧0.70, most preferred ≧0.80 based on the codon usage table of Cyanobacterium sp. with the accession no. PTA-13311 (Table 1).







TABLE 1







Codon usage table of Cyanobacterium sp. accession no. PTA-13311.












AA
AmAcid
Codon
Fraction
Number
Frequency (/1000)















A
Ala
GCA
0.293
20724
18.356


A
Ala
GCC
0.214
15144
13.414


A
Ala
GCG
0.14
9870
8.742


A
Ala
GCT
0.353
24915
22.068


R
Arg
AGA
0.347
16040
14.207


R
Arg
AGG
0.09
4158
3.683


R
Arg
CGA
0.106
4886
4.328


R
Arg
CGC
0.131
6043
5.353


R
Arg
CGG
0.039
1813
1.606


R
Arg
CGT
0.288
13329
11.806


N
Asn
AAC
0.22
14609
12.94


N
Asn
AAT
0.78
51712
45.804


D
Asp
GAC
0.193
11063
9.799


D
Asp
GAT
0.807
46399
41.098


C
Cys
TGC
0.218
2501
2.215


C
Cys
TGT
0.782
8976
7.95


Q
Gln
CAA
0.806
43747
38.749


Q
Gln
CAG
0.194
10554
9.348


E
Glu
GAA
0.787
60690
53.756


E
Glu
GAG
0.213
16451
14.571


G
Gly
GGA
0.324
22709
20.114


G
Gly
GGC
0.125
8720
7.724


G
Gly
GGG
0.151
10542
9.338


G
Gly
GGT
0.401
28065
24.859


H
His
CAC
0.251
4859
4.304


H
His
CAT
0.749
14516
12.858


I
Ile
ATA
0.195
18334
16.239


I
Ile
ATC
0.19
17872
15.83


I
Ile
ATT
0.616
57964
51.342


L
Leu
CTA
0.088
10776
9.545


L
Leu
CTC
0.058
7129
6.314


L
Leu
CTG
0.033
4040
3.578


L
Leu
CTT
0.116
14162
12.544


L
Leu
TTA
0.571
69559
61.612


L
Leu
TTG
0.133
16235
14.38


K
Lys
AAA
0.836
59396
52.61


K
Lys
AAG
0.164
11694
10.358


M
Met
ATG
1
20093
17.797


F
Phe
TTC
0.172
8420
7.458


F
Phe
TTT
0.828
40450
35.829


P
Pro
CCA
0.169
7746
6.861


P
Pro
CCC
0.275
12613
11.172


P
Pro
CCG
0.066
3012
2.668


P
Pro
CCT
0.491
22560
19.982


S
Ser
AGC
0.088
6435
5.7


S
Ser
AGT
0.306
22393
19.835


S
Ser
TCA
0.14
10217
9.05


S
Ser
TCC
0.102
7465
6.612


S
Ser
TCG
0.044
3196
2.831


S
Ser
TCT
0.321
23473
20.791


T
Thr
ACA
0.26
15649
13.861


T
Thr
ACC
0.236
14251
12.623


T
Thr
ACG
0.083
5024
4.45


T
Thr
ACT
0.42
25340
22.445


W
Trp
TGG
1
14964
13.254


Y
Tyr
TAC
0.187
7364
6.523


Y
Tyr
TAT
0.813
31912
28.266


V
Val
GTA
0.28
18541
16.423


V
Val
GTC
0.117
7778
6.889


V
Val
GTG
0.184
12184
10.792


V
Val
GTT
0.419
27713
24.547


*
End
TAA
0.63
2495
2.23


*
End
TAG
0.22
848
0.76


*
End
TGA
0.15
591
0.53









In a further variant of the invention, the extrachromosomal plasmid comprises an origin of replication with a nucleotide sequence having at least 80%, 90%, preferably at least 95% identity to the sequence deposited under SEQ ID NO: 12. This origin of replication is particularly suitable for replication in Cyanobacterium sp. with the accession number PTA-13311.
In a further variant the cyanobacterial cell further comprises a gene having at least 80%, 90%, preferably at least 95% sequence identity to the nucleotide sequence deposited under SEQ ID NO: 13 which codes for a replication initiation factor binding to the above-mentioned origin of replication. The gene coding for the replication initiation factor binding to the origin of replication can, for instance, be present on the extrachromosomal plasmid itself which also harbors the origin of replication. Alternatively, the gene coding for the replication initiation factor can be present in the chromosomes or other extrachromosomal plasmids of the cyanobacterial cell. The origin of replication and the gene coding for the replication initiation protein binding to said origin of replication are particularly suitable for replication of the extrachromosomal plasmid in Cyanobacterium sp. with the accession number PTA-13311, and ensure stable replication of the plasmid in the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell.
In a further variant of the invention, the extrachromosomal plasmid comprises a sequence having at least 90% identity, preferably at least 95% identity to the sequence deposited under SEQ ID NO: 14. This plasmid is endogenous to the species Cyanobacterium sp. with the accession number PTA-13311 and is therefore more stable when transformed to the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell than plasmids derived from completely different organisms. In some embodiments, the entire endogenous plasmid may be inserted in a vector.
The extrachromosomal plasmid can also be part of a shuttle vector which is characterized by being replicable in both Escherichia coli and cyanobacterial species. To this end, the shuttle vector can comprise a promoter functioning in cyanobacteria and E. coli and a DNA sequence encoding a protein functioning as a selective marker for both Escherichia coli and cyanobacteria. Alternatively, the shuttle vector can include two different promoter systems, one functioning in cyanobacteria and the other one functioning in E. coli. With such a shuttle vector the efficient transformation of cyanobacteria and the expression of recombinant genes of interest are enabled. The shuttle vector can further contain a replication unit that functions in a broad range of cyanobacterial genera. The shuttle vector can also contain a replication unit for propagation in E. coli for ease of cloning and genetic manipulation in E. coli prior to the transformation of the shuttle vector into cyanobacteria.
In a further embodiment, the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell comprises at least one further recombinant gene encoding a second Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid sequence of the recombinant gene encoding the first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme differs from the nucleic acid sequence of the recombinant gene encoding the second Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. Differences in the nucleic acid sequence of the adh gene can, for example, include degenerated gene sequences due to changes in the wobble bases in the triplet codon which do not change the amino acid encoded by this triplet. Another example of non-identical adh gene sequences comprises gene sequences comprising conservative mutations. In some further embodiments, the amino acid sequence of the first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme differs from the amino acid sequence of the second Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. Adh enzymes with different amino acid sequences can include, for example, neutral amino acid substitutions or enzyme isoforms. In this way, the gene copy number of alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes can be increased in the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell to ensure an advantageously high expression level. At the same time, the risk of homologous recombination between the adh genes is avoided, which could otherwise lead to gene inactivation, for instance by an adh gene knock-out. As a result, the genetic stability of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium is improved so that a stable ethanol production can be maintained for a long cultivation time.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the recombinant gene encoding the first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the second Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme are both under the transcriptional control of an inducible promoter or are both under the transcriptional control of inducible promoters which are inducible under the same conditions. In this way, particularly high Adh activity levels can be achieved in the cyanobacterial cell and high ethanol production rates can be accomplished.
In particular, the inducible promoters of any of the above embodiments may be selected from the endogenous inducible promoters identified in Cyanobacterium sp. with the ATCC accession number PTA-13311 listed in Table 2, and variants thereof.







TABLE 2







Listing of promoters inducible by a change in the concentration of 


Ni2+, Cu2+ Co2+ and Zn2+ identified in ABICyano1:













INDUCIBLE


GENE ID
SEQ ID NO:
HOMOLOGY
BY













ABICyano1_orf0128
48
hypothetical protein
Ni2+


ABICyano1_orf1486
49
putative nickel-
Ni2+




containing superoxide





dismutase



ABICyano1_orf3164
50
ferrochelatase
Ni2+


ABICyano1_orf3293
51
hypothetical protein
Ni2+




L8106_16134



ABICyano1_orf3621
52
hypothetical protein
Ni2+




Cyan7822_1798



ABICyano1_orf3635
53
carbohydrate-selective 
Ni2+




porin



ABICyano1_orf3858
54
manganese/iron
Ni2+




superoxide dismutase-





like protein



ABICyano1_orf1071
55
Mn transporter
Zn2+


ABICyano1_orf1072
56
ABC transporter
Zn2+




family protein



ABICyano1_orf1074
57
ABC 3 transport
Zn2+




family



ABICyano1_orf1075
58
No hits found -|-
Zn2+




KEGG: -|- CyanoBase



ABICyano1_orf1542
59
hypothetical protein
Zn2+




PCC8801_4423



ABICyano1_orf1823
60
RNA polymerase
Zn2+




sigma factor



ABICyano1_orf1824
61
No hits found -|-
Zn2+




KEGG: -|- CyanoBase



ABICyano1_orf3126
62
Metallothionein
Zn2+


ABICyano1_orf3389
63
HtrA2 peptidase
Zn2+


ABICyano1_orf0221
64
CopA family copper-
Cu2+




resistance protein



ABICyano1_orf0222
65
copper resistance B
Cu2+


ABICyano1_orf0223
66
No hits found -|-
Cu2+




KEGG: -|- CyanoBase



ABICyano1_orf0316
67
hypothetical protein
Cu2+




CY0110_11047



ABICyano1_orf3232
68
cation-transporting
Cu2+




ATPase



ABICyano1_orf3461
69
petJ
Cu2+ depletion


ABICyano1_orf3749
70
conserved hypothetical 
Co2+




protein









In a fourth aspect, this invention provides a method for producing the above-described metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol. The method comprises the steps of:

    
    
        A) providing a cyanobacterial cell,
        B) introducing the at least one recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the at least one recombinant gene encoding the first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme into the wild type host cell, wherein
        (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and
        (ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than 0.08·10−3 M, preferably lower than 0.07·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 0.06·10−3 M;
        
            or
            the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 0.65·10−3 M, higher than 0.7·10−3 M, or higher than 0.73·10−3 M, but lower than 10·10−3 M, preferably lower than 9·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 8·10−3 M, and the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M,
            resulting in the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol.
        
        
    
    


In further embodiments of the method, any one of the above-described variants of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell is produced.
In a fifth aspect, this invention provides a method for producing ethanol, comprising the method steps of:

    
    
        a) providing the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol or any of the variants thereof as described above,
        b) culturing the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell in a growth medium under the exposure of light, the cyanobacterial cell producing ethanol while being cultured,
        c) retrieving the ethanol from the cyanobacterial cell, the growth medium and/or a headspace above the growth medium.
    
    


This method provides enhanced ethanol yields due to the principle features and associated advantageous properties of the above-described metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial host cell.
In one embodiment, the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme is under the transcriptional control of an inducible promoter which can be induced by an exogenous stimulus. In this case, method step b) comprises providing or enhancing the exogenous stimulus, thereby inducing or enhancing ethanol production. In this way, the ethanol production can be decoupled from metabolic pathways of the cell which are essential for growth and proliferation, thereby allowing accumulation of high cell densities in the culture and large amounts of precursor substrates prior to induction of the Pdc and, thus, the ethanol formation. In this way, significantly increased amounts of ethanol can be produced.
In another embodiment, both the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme are under the transcriptional control of the same single inducible promoter which can be induced by an exogenous stimulus and method step b) comprises providing or enhancing the exogenous stimulus. In this way, particularly high ethanol production rates are achieved.
In a sixth aspect of the invention, an isolated nucleic acid sequence is provided which comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh). The recombinant gene comprises a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to:

    
    
        SEQ ID NO: 15,
        SEQ ID NO: 16,
        SEQ ID NO: 17,
    
    


subject to the condition that the requirements are fulfilled that (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and
(ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than 0.08·10−3 M, preferably lower than 0.07·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 0.06·10−3 M.
In a seventh aspect of the invention, an isolated nucleic acid sequence is provided which comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh). The recombinant gene comprises a nucleic acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to:

    
    
        SEQ ID NO: 18,
        SEQ ID NO: 19,
        SEQ ID NO: 20, or
        SEQ ID NO: 22,
    
    


subject to the condition that the requirements are fulfilled that (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and
(ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 0.65·10−3 M, higher than 0.7·10−3 M or higher than 0.73·10−3 M, but lower than 10·10−3 M, preferably lower than 9·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 8·10−3 M, and at the same time (iii) the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M.
In an eighth aspect of the invention, an isolated nucleic acid sequence is provided which comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh). The recombinant gene comprises a nucleic acid sequence having at least 92% sequence identity, preferably at least 95% sequence identity to:

    
    
        SEQ ID NO: 23,

subject to the condition that the requirements are fulfilled that (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and

(ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 0.65·10−3 M, higher than 0.7·10−3 M or higher than 0.73·10−3 M, but lower than 10·10−3 M, preferably lower than 9·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 8·10−3 M, and at the same time (iii) the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M.

    
    


In a ninth aspect of the invention, an isolated nucleic acid sequence is provided which comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh). The recombinant gene comprises a nucleic acid sequence having at least 98% sequence identity to:

    
    
        SEQ ID NO: 24,
    
    


subject to the condition that the requirements are fulfilled that (i) the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, and
(ii) the Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 0.65·10−3 M, higher than 0.7·10−3 M or higher than 0.73·10−3 M, but lower than 10·10−3 M, preferably lower than 9·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 8·10−3 M, and at the same time (iii) the Michaelis constant Km for ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is higher than 20·10−3 M, preferably higher than 25·10−3 M, most preferred higher than 30·10−3 M.
The above-described recombinant genes encode Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes that were identified by the inventors in the screening procedure and exemplarily possess the Km values for NADPH, acetaldehyde and/or ethanol required for carrying out the present invention. Adh enzymes that were initially identified in the screening procedure but did not meet the required Km values were dismissed.
In some embodiments, the above-described isolated nucleic acid sequences further comprise at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde.
In further embodiments, a transcription terminator sequence is present between the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. In this way, translation of the Pdc and Adh from separate mRNAs is achieved which has been found by the inventors to lead to significantly improved ethanol yields.
The recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme can be under the transcriptional control of a constitutive promoter. In this way, a certain level of transcription and, therefore, enzymatic activity of the corresponding Adh enzyme can be achieved when the isolated nucleic acid sequence is used for metabolically enhancing a host cell. This is, for example, advantageous to maintain continuous conversion of acetaldehyde to ethanol by the cell and avoid harmful accumulation of acetaldehyde in higher amounts. Suitable constitutive promoters include, without limitation, the PrpsL promoter (Gene ID: ABICyanol_orf1758), PpsaA promoter (ABICyanol_orf3243), PpsbB (ABICyanol_orf2107), PcpcB promoter (ABICyanol_orf2472), PatpG (ABICyanol_orf1814), PrbcL promoter (ABICyanol_orf1369), PpetE promoter (ABICyanol_orf2417), and variations thereof. Further suitable endogenous constitutive promoters from genes with unknown function exhibiting appropriate transcriptional activity include, without limitation, the promoters of Gene IDs ABICyano_orf1924, ABICyano_orf1997, ABICyano_orf3446, ABICyano_orf0865, ABICyano_orf1919, ABICyano_orf3278, ABICyano_orf1181, ABICyano_orf1627, ABICyano_orf0265 and ABICyano_orf2536, and variants thereof.
The recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme can be under the transcriptional control of an inducible promoter. The inducible promoter can, for example, be inducible by a change of a metal-ion concentration. Such a change of metal-ion concentration includes for instance the addition or depletion of certain metal ions. Suitable inducible promoters include, without limitation, the PziaA promoter, the PsmtA promoter, the PaztA promoter, the PcorT promoter, the PnrsB promoter, the PpetJ promoter, and variations thereof. The inducible promoter can, for instance, also be a nitrate inducible promoter. Suitable nitrate inducible promoters include, without limitation, the PnirA promoter, the PnrtA promoter, the PnarB promoter, the PmntC promoter, and variations thereof. Furthermore, the inducible promoter may be selected from the endogenous inducible promoters identified in Cyanobacterium sp. with the ATCC accession number PTA-13311 listed in Table 2 above, and variants thereof. Preferably, the promoter is copper-inducible, such as for instance the Porf0316 promoter or the Porf0221 promoter.
In preferred embodiments wherein the isolated nucleic acid sequence comprises both the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme are under the transcriptional control of different promoters. For example, the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme can be under the transcriptional control of an inducible promoter and the recombinant gene encoding the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme can be under the transcriptional control of a constitutive promoter. Preferably, a transcription terminator is present between the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. The transcriptional control of the Pdc and Adh encoding genes by separate promoters and the corresponding translation from separate mRNAs is a combination that has been found to significantly improve ethanol production.
In a tenth aspect, use of a metabolically enhanced host cell for the production of a C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 alcohol is provided. The metabolically enhanced host cell comprises at least one recombinant gene encoding a Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting a C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde into the corresponding alcohol, wherein the Michaelis constant Km for the C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than 0.2·10−3 M, preferably lower than 0.15·10−3 M, most preferred lower than 0.12·10−3 M.
Interestingly, such Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes exhibit a relatively broad substrate spectrum and efficiently convert C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehydes into the corresponding alcohols. The activity and/or affinity for the C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde substrate is often significantly higher than for acetaldehyde, so that these substrates are even more efficiently converted by the Adh enzymes.
In one embodiment, the Michaelis constant Km for NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is lower than the Michaelis constant Km for NADH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme.
In another embodiment, the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity, preferably at least 85% sequence identity, more preferably at least 90% sequence identity and most preferred at least 95% sequence identity to

    
    
        SEQ ID NO: 1,
        SEQ ID NO: 2,
        SEQ ID NO: 3, or
        SEQ ID NO: 11.
    
    


The C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde can, for example, be provided as an aldehyde intermediate from a heterologous biosynthesis pathway, so that the aldehyde intermediate can be reduced by the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme into the corresponding alcohol. Examples for suitable heterologous biosynthesis pathways include the expanded 1-butanol pathway, the engineered reversal of the β-oxidation pathway, and the 2-keto acid metabolic pathways. For a more detailed description of these and other suitable heterologous biosynthetic pathways for provision of the aldehyde intermediate, reference is made to Wang et al. (Wang, B., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Meldrum, D. R.: Application of synthetic biology in cyanobacteria and algae, Frontiers in Microbiology 2012, 3, 344) and Desai and Atsumi (Desai, S. H., Atsumi, S.: Photosynthetic approaches to chemical biotechnology, Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2013, 24, in press), as well as the references cited therein. Therefore, in another embodiment, the metabolically enhanced host cell comprises at least one metabolic enhancement resulting in an enhanced availability of a C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde intermediate in the host cell in comparison to a wild type of the host cell. The last reduction step, from the aldehyde intermediate to the corresponding alcohol, of the heterologous biosynthetic pathway to produce longer chain alcohols can then be realized by the above-described recombinant genes encoding the Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes that were identified by the inventors in the screening procedure.
The alcohol can be a primary, secondary or tertiary alcohol. The alcohol can be an alkanol or a phenol. In particular, the alcohol is selected from the group comprising propan-1-ol (C3), butan-1-ol (C4), pentan-1-ol (C5), hexan-1-ol (C6), heptan-1-ol (C7), octan-1-ol (C8), nonan-1-ol (C9), decan-1-ol (C10), propan-2-ol (C3), butan-2-ol (C4), pentan-2-ol (C5), hexan-2-ol (C6), heptan-2-ol (C7), 2-methylbutan-1-ol (C5), cyclohexanol (C6), 2-methylpropan-2-ol (C4), 2-methylbutan-2-ol (C5), 2-methylpentan-2-ol (C6), 2-methylhexan-2-ol (C7), 2-methylheptan-2-ol (C8), 3-methylpentan-3-ol (C6), 3-methyloctan-3-ol (C9), benzyl alcohol (C7), phenylethyl alcohol (C8), and combinations thereof.
In yet further embodiments, the host cell may also comprise any of the features of the above-described metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells for ethanol production that are also commensurate to the production of the C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 alcohol from the C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 aldehyde.
FIGURES AND EMBODIMENTS
In the following, certain embodiments of the invention will be explained in more detail with reference to figures and experimental data. The figures and examples are not intended to be limiting with respect to specific details.
Example 1
Pre-Cultivation of Cyanobacterial Strains
Cyanobacterial cells were grown in 50 ml of BG11 or mBG11 medium in Erlenmeyer flasks.
The recipe for the cyanobacterial growth medium mBG11 was as follows:

    
    
        NaNO3: 1.5 g
        K2HPO4: 0.04 g
        MgSO4.7H2O: 0.075 g
        CaCl2.2H2O: 0.036 g
        Citric acid: 0.006 g
        Ferric ammonium citrate: 0.006 g
        EDTA (disodium salt): 0.001 g
        NaCO3: 0.02 g
        Trace metal mix A5: 1.0 ml
        Distilled water: 1.0 L
        (pH 7.1 adjusted after sterilization)
    
    


Herein, the recipe for the trace metal mix A5 was:

    
    
        H3BO3: 2.86 g
        MnCl2.4H2O: 1.81 g
        *ZnSO4.7H2O: 0.222 g
        NaMoO4.2H2O: 0.39 g
        CuSO4.5H2O: 0.079 g
        *Co(NO3)2.6H2O: 49.4 mg
        Distilled water or seawater (35 practical salinity units=psu; see Unesco (1981a). The Practical Salinity Scale 1978 and the International Equation of State of Seawater 1980. Tech. Pap. Mar. Sci., 36: 25 pp.): 1.0 L
    
    


The asterisk (*) denotes those metal supplements that can be either temporarily omitted or used in reduced amounts if these metals are also used as inductor for corresponding metal-inducible promoters in the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial strain.
The cells were constantly illuminated at an illumination intensity of approximately 50 μE·s−1·m−2 at 28° C. on a rotary shaker.
Example 2
In Vivo Screening of NADPH-Dependent Native Adh Function of Genes in Wild-Type Strains
For the in vivo screening of NADPH-dependent native Adh function of genes in wild-type strains, the cyanobacterial cells from the pre-culture of example 1 were pelleted by 15 minutes centrifugation at 4143 rcf at 20° C. on a Rotina 420R centrifuge from Hettich and then re-dissolved in 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5. 2 mL aliquots were transferred into 20 mL gas chromatography (GC) sampling vials and sealed with silicon septum caps. 5 mM acetaldehyde in water was added to the cells to obtain final concentrations of 125 μM and 250 μM acetaldehyde, respectively. At least two GC vials per wild-type strain were prepared. The GC vials were incubated at 37° C. on the GC's autosampler sample tray, wherein at least one GC vial per wild-type strain was incubated under constant illumination at a light intensity between 50 μE m−2 s−1 and 180 μE m−2 s−1. For example, a light intensity of 120 μE m−2 s−1 was used. At least one other GC vial per wild-type strain was incubated without illumination. Further on, the ethanol and acetaldehyde concentration in the GC vials was measured via headspace measurement as described further below in example 7. The measurements were repeated in intervals of 10 min and ethanol production rates and acetaldehyde consumption rates were calculated on the basis of total protein concentration in the sample. Total protein in the sample was determined as described further below in example 3. Afterwards, the ethanol production rates and acetaldehyde consumption rates for the illuminated sample and the non-illuminated sample of each wild-type strain were compared and the wild-type strains exhibiting higher ethanol production rates and acetaldehyde consumption rates under illumination were selected for further characterization.
Example 3
Preparation of Cell Extracts
Cyanobacterial cells from the liquid pre-culture from example 1 were pelleted by 15 minutes centrifugation at 4143 rcf at 20° C. on a Rotina 420R centrifuge from Hettich. The pellets were redissolved in 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5 with 150 mM KCl and 1 mM DTT, hereinafter referred to as lysis buffer. One milliliter of the cell slurry was transferred into a fresh 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and 500 microliter of glass beads with 100 μm diameter were added. Cells were then disintegrated on a Retch mill bead mill at the highest frequency setting in two cycles of 10 minutes each with a break of 10 minutes between the cycles wherein the samples were kept on ice. Afterwards, cell debris and glass beads were removed by centrifugation at 22350 rcf for 10 minutes at 4° C. on a Micro 200R table top centrifuge from Hettich. Cell extract in the supernatant was transferred into a fresh Eppendorf tube. An aliquot of the cell extract was withdrawn for measuring the total protein concentration in the cell extract. For this purpose, a protein precipitation with DOC/TCA (Bensadoun, A. and Weinstein, D.: Assay of Proteins in the Presence of Interfering Materials, Analytical Biochemistry 1976, 70, 241-245) was performed in the aliquot. Afterwards, the protein precipitate was redissolved and the total protein concentration was measured with the method of Lowry (Lowry, O. H. et al.: Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent, Journal of Biological Chemistry 1951, 193, 265-275). Typically, the proportion of adh enzyme amounts to less than 1% of the total protein content in the cell extract. The cell extracts were further purified by size exclusion chromatography on a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) which was equilibrated and eluted with lysis buffer according to the protocol provided by manufacturer. Accordingly, the first 3-6 ml of eluate contain the proteins including the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme and were collected. Other fractions without proteins were discarded.
Example 4
Measurement of Adh Activity and Kinetic Constants
The optic enzymatic assay for determination of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme activity contained 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT and 0.15 mM NADPH, to which various amounts of the clarified cell extract of example 2 were added. The reaction was started by addition of acetaldehyde to a final concentration of 5 mM. The NADPH oxidation was followed at 340 nm wavelength on a Shimadzu UV2450 spectrophotometer. A constant temperature of 30° C. was maintained during the measurement (TCC controller, Shimadzu). The Adh activity was calculated in μmol/min·mg protein.
The optic enzymatic assay for determination of the Km values for acetaldehyde and NADPH of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes contained 30 mM HEPES/KOH pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT and 0.15 mM NADPH. The reaction was started by addition of varying amounts of acetaldehyde in final concentrations between 1 μM and 50 mM. The NADPH oxidation was spectrophotometrically monitored at a wavelength of 340 nm on a Shimadzu UV2450 spectrophotometer. A constant temperature of 30° C. was maintained during the measurement (TCC controller, Shimadzu).
For measurement of the back reaction and the Km value for ethanol, the samples contained 0.15 mM NADP+ instead of 0.15 mM NADPH, and varying amounts of ethanol between 1 mM and about 2.5 M final concentration were added.
Km values were computed using the GraphPad Prism software, version 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, Calif., USA).
As an example, FIGS. 1A and 1B show the results from the graphical computation of the Michaelis constants Km for acetaldehyde and ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase from Lyngbya sp. with amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 1. FIGS. 2A and 2B show the corresponding graphical computations of the Michaelis constants Km for acetaldehyde and ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase from Arthrospira platensis with amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 2. A summary of the Km values for acetaldehyde and ethanol as well as the ratios of Km (ethanol)/Km (acetaldehyde) of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes of the present invention is provided in the following Table 3.







TABLE 3







Summary of the Michaelis constants for acetaldehyde (MeCHO)


and ethanol (EtOH) and their corresponding ratio of the alcohol


dehydrogenase enzymes of the present invention


(values in brackets represent standard deviations). The alcohol 


dehydrogenase enzyme of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 (SEQ ID NO: 26) 


is included as a comparative example.











SEQ ID

Km(MeCHO) 
Km(EtOH) 
Km(EtOH)/


NO
Organism
[mM]
[mM]
Km(MeCHO)














1
Lyngbya sp.
0.0058
0.83 (±0.084)
143




(±0.0011)




2
Arthrospira
0.0023
2.64 (±0.11)
1056



platensis
(±0.0005)




3
Cyanothece sp.
0.0756
9.33 (±1.39)
123




(±0.0056)




4
Synechococcus sp. 
0.731 
32.4 (±12.4)
44




(±0.070)




5
Synechococcus sp. 
0.783 
67.0 (±16.3)
86




(±0.086)




6
Synechococcus sp. 
1.13 
29.3 (±8.5)
26




(±0.076)




7
Chroococcidiopsis 
1.79 
 107 (±18)
60



sp.
(±0.119)




8
Arthronema
3.34 
 279 (±66)
84



africanum
(±0.31)




9
Chroococcidiopsis
3.73 
 124 (±24)
33



sp.
(±0.15)




10
Cyanobacterium sp.
6.95 
 306 (±49)
44




(±0.83)




26
Synechocystis sp. 
0.35 
  19 (±3.61)
54



PCC6803
(±0.0385)









Example 5
Construction of Ethanologenic Plasmid Vectors
Plasmid annotations were done with the program vector NTI. Abbreviations: CDS (coding DNA sequence); RBS (ribosome binding site); ORF (open reading frame); Km (kanamycin resistance gene). Asterisks (*) or (**), optionally followed by a number, denote recombinantly modified genes or promoters.
Plasmid construct TK293: The plasmid construct is a synthetic derivative of an endogenous 6.8 kB extrachromosomal plasmid of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311. The map of TK293 is shown in FIG. 3A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 27. The plasmid harbors a codon improved variant of synAdh denoted synAdh(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PrpsL promoter, and a codon improved variant from Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate decarboxylase denoted pdc(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 4055 . . . 4580 promoter Prbc; 4582 . . . 5397 CDS Km**; 12959 . . . 13207 CDS ORF6; 12699 . . . 12962 CDS ORF5; 11971 . . . 12657 CDS ORF4; 10881 . . . 11645 CDS ORF3; 10436 . . . 10621 CDS ORF2; 9736 . . . 9753 replication origin; 7215 . . . 10400 CDS replication origin binding protein; 5640 . . . 6698 replication origin OriVT; 2112 . . . 2680 PrpsL promoter; 379 . . . 2085 CDS PDC(opt1); 2684 . . . 3691 CDS synADH(opt1); 96 . . . 378 PnirA promoter; 3695 . . . 3850 TrbcS terminator.
Plasmid construct #1646: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1646 is shown in FIG. 3B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 28. The plasmid harbors a codon improved variant of an adh gene from Lyngbya sp., denoted Adh111(opt), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc* promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 4776 . . . 5834 replication origin OriVT; 6351 . . . 9536 CDS replication origin binding protein; 8872 . . . 8889 replication origin; 9572 . . . 9757 CDS ORF2; 10017 . . . 10781 CDS ORF3; 11107 . . . 11793 CDS ORF4; 11835 . . . 12098 CDS ORF5; 12095 . . . 12343 CDS ORF6; 3718 . . . 4533 Km**; 3253 . . . 3716 promoter Prbc; 2063 . . . 2131 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 2017 . . . 2062 terminator dsrA\ter; 3167 . . . 3212 terminator ter; 2132 . . . 3148 CDS Adh111(opt).
Plasmid construct #1652: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1652 is shown in FIG. 4A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 29. The plasmid harbors a codon improved variant of an adh gene from Lyngbya sp., denoted Adh111(opt), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1 under the transcriptional control of the PrpsL promoter with optimized TATA box and RBS, denoted PrpsL*4. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2053 . . . 2170 promoter PrpsL*4; 3206 . . . 3251 terminator ter; 2171 . . . 3187 CDS Adh111(opt); 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 3292 . . . 3755 promoter Prbc; 3757 . . . 4572 CDS Km**; 12134 . . . 12382 CDS ORF6; 11874 . . . 12137 CDS ORF5; 11146 . . . 11832 CDS ORF4; 10056 . . . 10820 CDS ORF3; 9611 . . . 9796 CDS ORF2; 8911 . . . 8928 replication origin; 6390 . . . 9575 replication origin binding protein; 4815 . . . 5873 origin OriVT; 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 1995 . . . 2051 terminator dsrA\ter.
Plasmid construct #1658: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1658 is shown in FIG. 4B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 30. The plasmid harbors the synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt3) under the transcriptional control of an improved PnirA promoter, denoted PnirA*2. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 4745 . . . 5803 replication origin OriVT; 6320 . . . 9505 CDS replication origin binding protein; 8841 . . . 8858 replication origin; 9541 . . . 9726 CDS ORF2; 9986 . . . 10750 CDS ORF3; 11076 . . . 11762 CDS ORF4; 11804 . . . 12067 CDS ORF5; 12064 . . . 12312 CDS ORF6; 3687 . . . 4502 CDS Km**; 3222 . . . 3685 promoter PrbcL; 3165 . . . 3195 terminator oop; 2125 . . . 3135 CDS synADH; 2010 . . . 2055 terminator dsrA\ter; 2056 . . . 2124 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 1 . . . 284 promoter PnirA*2; 285 . . . 1991 CDS zmPDC(opt3).
Plasmid construct #1684: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1684 is shown in FIG. 5A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 31. The plasmid harbors a codon improved variant of the adh gene from Lyngbya sp., denoted Adh111(opt), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the improved PnirA promoter, denoted PnirA*2. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2125 . . . 3141 CDS Adh111(opt); 3160 . . . 3205 terminator ter; 2010 . . . 2055 terminator dsrA\ter; 2056 . . . 2124 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 3246 . . . 3709 promoter Prbc; 3711 . . . 4526 CDS Km**; 12088 . . . 12336 CDS ORF6; 11828 . . . 12091 CDS ORF5; 11100 . . . 11786 CDS ORF4; 10010 . . . 10774 CDS ORF3; 9565 . . . 9750 CDS ORF2; 8865 . . . 8882 replication origin; CDS 6344 . . . 9529 replication origin binding protein; 4769 . . . 5827 origin OriVT; 4 . . . 287 promoter PnirA*2; 293 . . . 1991 CDS zmPDC(opt3).
Plasmid construct #1754: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1754 is shown in FIG. 5B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 32. The plasmid harbors a codon improved variant of an adh gene from Arthrospira platensis, denoted Adh1694(opt), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2063 . . . 2131 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 2017 . . . 2062 terminator dsrA\ter; 2132 . . . 3154 CDS Adh1694(opt); 3170 . . . 3215 terminator ter; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 4779 . . . 5837 origin OriVT; 6354 . . . 9539 CDS replication origin binding protein; 8875 . . . 8892 replication origin; 9575 . . . 9760 CDS ORF2; 10020 . . . 10784 CDS ORF3; 11110 . . . 11796 CDS ORF4; 11838 . . . 12101 CDS ORF5; 12098 . . . 12346 CDS ORF6; 3721 . . . 4536 CDS Km**; 3256 . . . 3719 promoter Prbc.
Plasmid construct #1760: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1760 is shown in FIG. 6A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 33. The plasmid harbors a codon improved variant of an adh gene from Arthrospira platensis, denoted Adh1694(opt), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2 under the transcriptional control of the PrpsL promoter with optimized TATA box and RBS, denoted PrpsL*4. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 3298 . . . 3761 promoter Prbc; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 3763 . . . 4578 CDS Km**, 12140 . . . 12388 CDS ORF6; 11880 . . . 12143 CDS ORF5; 11152 . . . 11838 CDS ORF4; 10062 . . . 10826 CDS ORF3; 9617 . . . 9802 CDS ORF2; 8917 . . . 8934 replication origin; 6396 . . . 9581 replication origin binding protein; 4821 . . . 5879 origin OriVT; 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 1998 . . . 2054 terminator dsrA\ter; 2056 . . . 2173 promoter PrpsL*4; 2174 . . . 3196 CDS Adh1694(opt); 3212 . . . 3257 terminator ter.
Plasmid construct #1578: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1578 is shown in FIG. 6B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 34. The plasmid harbors the synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2055 . . . 2123 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 2009 . . . 2054 terminator dsrA\ter; 2124 . . . 3134 CDS synADH; 3164 . . . 3194 terminator oop; 3221 . . . 3684 promoter PrbcL; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 3686 . . . 4501 CDS Km**; 12063 . . . 12311 CDS ORF6; 11803 . . . 12066 CDS ORF5; 11075 . . . 11761 CDS ORF4; 9985 . . . 10749 CDS ORF3; 9540 . . . 9725 CDS ORF2; 8840 . . . 8857 replication origin; 6319 . . . 9504 CDS replication origin binding protein; 4744 . . . 5802 origin OriVT; 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA.
Plasmid construct #1749: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1749 is shown in FIG. 7A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 35. The plasmid harbors the synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 under the transcriptional control of a modified PrpsL promoter, denoted PrpsL*4. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 3271 . . . 3734 promoter PrbcL; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 3736 . . . 4551 CDS Km**; 12113 . . . 12361 CDS ORF6; 11853 . . . 12116 CDS ORF5; 11125 . . . 11811 CDS ORF4; 10035 . . . 10799 CDS ORF3; 9590 . . . 9775 CDS ORF2; 8890 . . . 8907 replication origin; 6369 . . . 9554 replication origin binding protein; 4794 . . . 5852 origin OriVT; 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 1998 . . . 2054 terminator dsrA; 2056 . . . 2173 promoter PrpsL*4; 2174 . . . 3184 CDS synADH.
Plasmid construct #1606: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1606 is shown in FIG. 17A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 44. The plasmid harbors a codon improved synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 under the transcriptional control of a Prbc promoter with optimized ribosome binding site, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2063 . . . 2131 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 4858 . . . 5916 OriVT; 6433 . . . 9618 CDS replication origin binding protein; 8954 . . . 8971 replication origin; 9654 . . . 9839 CDS ORF2; 10099 . . . 10863 CDS ORF3; 11189 . . . 11875 CDS ORF4; 11917 . . . 12180 CDS ORF5; 12177 . . . 12425 CDS ORF6; 3800 . . . 4615 CDS Km**; 3335 . . . 3798 promoter Prbc; 3143 . . . 3298 terminator TrbcS; 2132 . . . 3139 CDS synADH(opt1); 2017 . . . 2062 terminator dsrA; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1).
Plasmid construct #1645: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1645 is shown in FIG. 17B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 45. The plasmid harbors a codon improved Adh gene from Synechoccoccus sp., denoted Adh916(opt), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 6 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPdc(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2063 . . . 2131 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 2017 . . . 2062 terminator dsrA\ter; 2132 . . . 3139 CDS Adh916(opt); 3155 . . . 3214 terminator ter; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 4764 . . . 5822 OriVT; 6339 . . . 9524 CDS replication origin binding protein; 8860 . . . 8877 replication origin; 9560 . . . 9745 CDS ORF2; 10005 . . . 10769 CDS ORF3; 11095 . . . 11781 CDS ORF4; 11823 . . . 12086 CDS ORF5; 12083 . . . 12331 CDS ORF6; 3706 . . . 4521 CDS Km**; 3241 . . . 3704 promoter Prbc.
Plasmid construct #1753: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1753 is shown in FIG. 20A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 46. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Lyngbya sp., denoted Adh111, encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2017 . . . 2062 dsrA\ter; 3165 . . . 3211 terminator ter; 2132 . . . 3151 CDS Adh111; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 4774 . . . 5832 OriVT; 6349 . . . 9534 CDS replication origin binding protein; 8870 . . . 8887 replication origin; 9570 . . . 9755 CDS ORF2; 10015 . . . 10779 CDS ORF3; 11105 . . . 11791 CDS ORF4; 11833 . . . 12096 CDS ORF5; 12093 . . . 12341 CDS ORF6; 3716 . . . 4531 CDS Km**; 3251 . . . 3714 promoter Prbc; 2063 . . . 2131 promoter Prbc*(optRBS).
Plasmid construct #1735: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1735 is shown in FIG. 20B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 47. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Arthrospira platensis, denoted Adh1694, encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2 under the transcriptional control of the Prbc promoter with optimized RBS, denoted Prbc*(optRBS). The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2063 . . . 2131 promoter Prbc*(optRBS); 2017 . . . 2062 terminator dsrA\ter; 3170 . . . 3216 terminator ter; 2132 . . . 3151 CDS Adh1694; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1 . . . 283 promoter PnirA; 4779 . . . 5837 OriVT; 6354 . . . 9539 CDS replication origin binding protein; 8875 . . . 8892 replication origin; 9575 . . . 9760 CDS ORF2; 10020 . . . 10784 CDS ORF3; 11110 . . . 11796 CDS ORF4; 11838 . . . 12101 CDS ORF5; 12098 . . . 12346 CDS ORF6; 3721 . . . 4536 CDS Km**; 3256 . . . 3719 promoter PrbcL.
Plasmid construct #1790: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1790 is shown in FIG. 21A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 71. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Arthrospira platensis, denoted Adh242(opt) (NB: for the purpose of the description of the present invention, the denotations Adh242 and Adh1694 are used synonymously for the same Adh enzyme from Arthrospira platensis), encoding a codon optimized variant of the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2453 . . . 3475 ADH242(opt); 3479 . . . 3637 terminator TrbcS; 2055 . . . 2451 promoter PcpcB; 3658 . . . 4121 promoter PrbcL; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 4123 . . . 4938 CDS Km**; 12500 . . . 12748 CDS orf6; 12240 . . . 12503 CDS orf5; 11512 . . . 12198 CDS orf4; 10422 . . . 11186 CDS orf3; 9977 . . . 10162 CDS orf2; 6756 . . . 9941 CDS orf1 replication origin binding protein; 5181 . . . 6239 OriVT; 6246 . . . 13079 insert; 1 . . . 283 PnirA promoter; 1998 . . . 2054 TdsrA terminator.
Plasmid construct #1791: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1791 is shown in FIG. 21B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 72. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Lyngbya sp. denoted Adh111(opt), encoding a codon optimized variant of the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 2 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2453 . . . 3469 CDS ADH111(opt); 3476 . . . 3634 terminator TrbcS; 2055 . . . 2451 promoter PcpcB; 3655 . . . 4118 promoter PrbcL; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 4120 . . . 4935 CDS Km**; 12497 . . . 12745 CDS orf6; 12237 . . . 12500 CDS orf5; 11509 . . . 12195 CDS orf4; 10419 . . . 11183 CDS orf3; 9974 . . . 10159 CDS orf2; 6753 . . . 9938 CDS orf1 replication origin binding protein; 5178 . . . 6236 replication origin OriVT; 6243 . . . 13076 insertion sequence; 1 . . . 283 PnirA; 1998 . . . 2054 TdsrA.
Plasmid construct #1792: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1792 is shown in FIG. 22A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 73. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Synechocystis sp. denoted synADH, encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2453 . . . 3463 CDS synADH; 3484 . . . 3642 TrbcS; 2055 . . . 2451 PcpcB promoter; 3663 . . . 4126 PrbcL promoter; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 4128 . . . 4943 CDS Km**; 12505 . . . 12753 CDS orf6; 12245 . . . 12508 CDS orf5; 11517 . . . 12203 CDS orf4; 10427 . . . 11191 CDS orf3; 9982 . . . 10167 CDS orf2; 6761 . . . 9946 CDS orf1; 5186 . . . 6244 OriVT; 6251 . . . 13084 insert; 1 . . . 283 PnirA; 1998 . . . 2054 TdsrA.
Plasmid construct #1793: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1793 is shown in FIG. 22B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 74. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Synechococcus sp. denoted Adh916(opt), encoding a codon optimized variant of the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 6 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2453 . . . 3460 CDS ADH916(opt); 3462 . . . 3616 TrbcS terminator; 2055 . . . 2451 PcpcB; 3643 . . . 4106 PrbcL; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 4108 . . . 4923 CDS Km**; 12485 . . . 12733 CDS orf6; 12225 . . . 12488 CDS orf5; 11497 . . . 12183 CDS orf4; 10407 . . . 11171 CDS orf3; 9962 . . . 10147 CDS orf2; 6741 . . . 9926 CDS orf1 replication origin binding protein; 5166 . . . 6224 OriVT; 6231 . . . 13064 insert; 1 . . . 283 PnirA; 1998 . . . 2054 TdsrA terminator.
Plasmid construct #1795: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1795 is shown in FIG. 23A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 75. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Cyanothece sp. denoted Adh553(opt), encoding a codon optimized variant of the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 3 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2051 . . . 2447 PcpcB; 3491 . . . 3645 TrbcS terminator; 2449 . . . 3450 CDS ADH553(opt); 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1995 . . . 2050 TdsrA terminator; 1 . . . 283 PnirA; 6260 . . . 13093 insert; 5195 . . . 6253 OriVT; 6770 . . . 9955 CDS orf1; 9991 . . . 10176 CDS orf2; 10436 . . . 11200 CDS orf3; 11526 . . . 12212 CDS orf4; 12254 . . . 12517 CDS orf5; 12514 . . . 12762 CDS orf6; 4137 . . . 4952 CDS Km**; 3672 . . . 4135 PrbcL.
Plasmid construct #1815: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1815 is shown in FIG. 23B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 76. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Chroococcidiopsis sp. denoted Adh1102(nat), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 9 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 285 . . . 1994 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1996 . . . 2052 terminator TdsrA; 2 . . . 284 PnirA; 6067 . . . 12900 insert; 5002 . . . 6060 OriVT; 6577 . . . 9762 CDS orf1; 9798 . . . 9983 CDS orf2; 10243 . . . 11007 CDS orf3; 11333 . . . 12019 CDS orf4; 12061 . . . 12324 CDS orf5; 12321 . . . 12569 CDS orf6; 3944 . . . 4759 CDS Km**; 3479 . . . 3942 PrbcL; 2451 . . . 3452 CDS ADH1102; 2053 . . . 2449 PcpcB.
Plasmid construct #1831: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1831 is shown in FIG. 24A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 77. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Synechococcus sp. denoted Adh213(nat), encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 5 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 290 . . . 1993 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 1995 . . . 2051 terminator TdsrA; 1 . . . 283 PnirA; 6072 . . . 12905 insert; 5007 . . . 6065 OriVT; 6582 . . . 9767 CDS orf1; 9803 . . . 9988 CDS orf2; 10248 . . . 11012 CDS orf3; 11338 . . . 12024 CDS orf4; 12066 . . . 12329 CDS orf5; 12326 . . . 12574 CDS orf6; 3949 . . . 4764 CDS Km**; 3484 . . . 3947 PrbcL; 2450 . . . 3457 CDS ADH213; 2052 . . . 2448 PcpcB.
Plasmid construct #1750: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1750 is shown in FIG. 24B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 78. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Lyngbya sp. denoted Adh111(opt), encoding a variant of the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1 codon optimized for Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 under the transcriptional control of the PrpsL promoter with optimized TATA box and RBS, denoted PrpsL*4. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt3) under the transcriptional control of the PnirA promoter with optimized TATA box and RBS, denoted PnirA. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 3295 . . . 3758 PrbcL promoter; 284 . . . 1990 CDS zmPDC(opt3); 3760 . . . 4575 CDS Km**; 12137 . . . 12385 CDS orf6; 11877 . . . 12140 CDS orf5; 11149 . . . 11835 CDS orf4; 10059 . . . 10823 CDS orf3; 9614 . . . 9799 CDS orf2; 6393 . . . 9578 CDS orf1; 4818 . . . 5876 CDS OriVT; 5883 . . . 12716 insert; 1 . . . 283 PnirA; 1998 . . . 2054 TdsrA; 2056 . . . 2173 PrpsL*4; 2174 . . . 3190 CDS ADH111(opt); 3209 . . . 3254 ter.
Plasmid construct #1784: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1784 is shown in FIG. 25A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 79. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Synechocystis sp. denoted synADH, encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt3) under the transcriptional control of an improved PnirA promoter, denoted PnirA*2. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2455 . . . 3465 CDS synADH; 2057 . . . 2453 PcpcB; 2000 . . . 2056 TdsrA; 6140 . . . 12973 insert; 5075 . . . 6133 OriVT; 6650 . . . 9835 CDS orf1; 9871 . . . 10056 CDS orf2; 10316 . . . 11080 CDS orf3; 11406 . . . 12092 CDS orf4; 12134 . . . 12397 CDS orf5; 12394 . . . 12642 CDS orf6; 4017 . . . 4832 CDS Km**; 3552 . . . 4015 PrbcL; 286 . . . 1992 zmPDC(opt3); 2 . . . 288 PnirA*2.
Plasmid construct #1835: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1835 is shown in FIG. 25B and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 80. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Synechocystis sp. denoted synADH, encoding the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 26 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the copper-inducible Porf0316 promoter, denoted Porf0316. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 336 . . . 2045 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 6 . . . 335 promoter Porf0316; 3712 . . . 4175 promoter PrbcL; 4177 . . . 4992 CDS Km**; 12554 . . . 12802 CDS orf6; 12294 . . . 12557 CDS orf5; 11566 . . . 12252 CDS orf4; 10476 . . . 11240 CDS orf3; 10031 . . . 10216 CDS orf2; 6810 . . . 9995 CDS orf1; 5235 . . . 6293 OriVT; 6300 . . . 13133 insert; 2047 . . . 2103 terminator TdsrA; 2502 . . . 3512 CDS synADH; 3533 . . . 3691 TrbcS; 2104 . . . 2500 PcpcB.
Plasmid construct #1938: The plasmid construct is a derivative of TK293. The map of #1938 is shown in FIG. 26A and its nucleotide sequence is deposited under SEQ ID NO: 81. The plasmid harbors an Adh gene from Lyngbya sp. denoted ADH111(opt), encoding a codon optimized variant of the Adh enzyme with SEQ ID NO: 1 under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, denoted PcpcB. The plasmid further harbors a codon improved pyruvate decarboxylase gene from Zymomonas mobilis denoted zmPDC(opt1) under the transcriptional control of the copper-inducible Porf0316 promoter, denoted Porf0316. The plasmid annotations are as follows: 2047 . . . 2103 terminator TdsrA; 6292 . . . 13125 insert; 5227 . . . 6285 OriVT; 6802 . . . 9987 CDS orf1; 10023 . . . 10208 CDS orf2; 10468 . . . 11232 CDS orf3; 11558 . . . 12244 CDS orf4; 12286 . . . 12549 CDS orf5; 12546 . . . 12794 CDS orf6; 4169 . . . 4984 CDS Km**; 3704 . . . 4167 promoter PrbcL; 2104 . . . 2500 PcpcB; 3525 . . . 3683 terminator TrbcS; 2502 . . . 3518 CDS ADH111(opt); 336 . . . 2045 CDS zmPDC(opt1); 6 . . . 335 promoter Porf0316.
Example 6
Transformation of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311
The Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 has a significant layer of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) outside the cell. The following method was used to decrease the EPS layer prior to conjugation. The method involves several steps: treatment of cells with N-acetylcysteine (NAC); washing steps that utilize NaCl; a treatment with lysozyme and subsequent washing. Firstly, 200 ml of an exponentially growing culture (0.5<OD750nm<1) was incubated with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for 2 days at 16° C. at 0.1 mg/ml final concentration without shaking Afterwards, the culture was pelleted at 4400 rpm and washed with 0.9% NaCl containing 8 mM EDTA. The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.5 M sucrose and incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature (RT) with slow shaking at 85 rpm. Then, cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 40 ml of a solution containing 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 4% sucrose, and 20-40 μg/ml lysozyme. After incubation at RT for 10-15 minutes, cells were centrifuged and washed three times using different washing solutions, namely i) with 30 mM Tris containing 4% sucrose and 1 mM EDTA, ii) with 100 mM Tris containing 2% sucrose and iii) with BG11 medium. All centrifugation steps before lysozyme treatment were performed at 4400 rpm for 10 min at 10° C., all centrifugations after the lysozyme treatment were performed at 2400 rpm for 5 minutes at 4° C.
Next, the cells were resuspended in 400 μl BG11 culture medium containing Tris/sucrose buffer and used for gene transfer via conjugation. Triparental mating was performed as follows. E. coli strain J53 bearing a conjugative RP4 plasmid and E. coli strain HB101 bearing the plasmid cargo to be introduced into Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 and the pRL528 helper plasmid for in vivo methylation were used. E. coli strains were grown in LB broth supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics overnight at 37° C. with shaking at 100 rpm. An aliquot of 3-5 ml of each culture was centrifuged, washed twice with LB medium and resuspended in 200 μl LB medium. Subsequently, the E. coli strains were mixed, centrifuged and resuspended in 100 μl BG11 medium. A 100 μl aliquot of the resuspended cyanobacterial cells and the E. coli cultures was mixed and applied onto a membrane filter (Millipore GVWP, 0.22 μm pore size) placed on the surface of solid BG11 medium supplemented with 5% LB. Petri dishes were incubated under dim light of 5 μmol photons m−2 s−1 for two days. Cells were then resuspended in fresh BG11 medium and plated onto selective medium containing 10 and 15 μg/ml kanamycin, respectively. The following selection conditions were used: light intensity approximately 20-40 μmol photons m−2 s−1 at a temperature of approximately 28° C. Transformants were visible after approximately 10-14 days. The transformant colonies were then plated on BG11 medium containing 15 μg/ml kanamycin and then stepwise transferred to higher kanamycin concentrations up to kanamycin 60 μg/ml to aid in the selection process.
Example 7
Determination of Acetaldehyde and Ethanol Accumulation by Headspace Gas Chromatography (GC Vial Online Method)
GC headspace measurements were performed on a Shimadzu GC-2010 gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector. The instrument is connected in line with a Shimadzu PAL LHS2-SHIM/AOC-5000 autosampler, comprising a gas-tight syringe for transfer of headspace aliquots from the culture samples to the analytical unit. For illumination of the culture samples in the autosampler, each sample tray is exposed with a LED acrylic sheet (length: 230 mm, width: 120 mm, diameter: 8 mm, 24 Chip, S4, 5300K), equipped with a dimmer (Stingl GmbH; Germany). Mixing of the samples in the autosampler was accomplished with the IKA RO5 power magnetic stirrer. A heating mat KM-SM3 of Mohr & Co. in combination with the JUMO dTRON 316 temperature regulator was used for thermostatization of the culture samples in the autosampler. The gas chromatograph was connected to helium carrier gas as well as hydrogen and artificial air as fuel gas and oxidizer gas, respectively, for the flame ionization detector. Oxidizer air was generated with the generator WGAZA50 from Science Support. The gas chromatograph was equipped with an FS-CS-624 medium bore capillary with a length of 30 m, internal diameter of 0.32 mm and film thickness of 1.8 μm from the GC supplier Chromatographie Service GmbH.
For sample preparation, the hybrid clones were grown on BG11 plates supplemented with 2 mM ammonia and 2 mM urea containing medium but without nitrate, since for nirA promoter constructs nitrate is the inducer. The sample was prepared by scratching an individual clone from the BG11 plate and resuspending the corresponding clone in marine BG11 liquid medium (mBG11) containing 50 mM TES pH 7.3 and 20 mM NaHCO3. Addition of inducing agent, e.g. nitrate or specific metal-salts, triggered acetaldehyde and ethanol production, respectively, in the sample by induction of the inducible promoter driving expression of the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme. The cell density in the sample was then adjusted to an optical density of approximately 0.7 at 750 nm wavelength. Two milliliters of sample were then filled into a gas-tight GC vial for headspace autosampling with a nominal volume of 20 ml. The sample headspace was supplemented with 5 ml CO2. The vial was tightly closed with a cap with self-sealing silicon septum and placed into the autosampler which was temperature-controlled at 37° C. The illumination was set to 120 μE. The magnetic stirrer was configured for interval mixing of the samples, with cycles of two minutes mixing at 400 rpm, followed by 90 minutes without mixing. An automated process followed, wherein after given times aliquots of 500 μl of the headspace of the sample were automatically drawn with the gas-tight syringe and injected via the injection port into the gas chromatograph for analysis. Before each headspace autosampling, the mixing is changed for 10 minutes to continuous mixing with 750 rpm at 37° C. incubation temperature. The syringe temperature was set to 70° C. The fill speed was 250 μl per second, following an initial lag time of 1 second after the septum of the samples had been pierced by the syringe needle. The injection of the aliquot into the gas chromatograph happened with an injection speed of 500 μl per second. Afterwards, the syringe flushed for 3 minutes with air to prevent sample carryover between two injections. The gas chromatograph runtime was 4 minutes 30 seconds. The injection temperature on the gas chromatograph was 230° C. The column temperature was 60° C. Detection was accomplished with the flame ionization detector at 250° C. process temperature. The makeup gas was nitrogen at 30 ml per minute, the fuel gas was hydrogen at 35 ml per minute and the oxidizer gas was artificial air at 400 ml per minute.
After the final measurement, the final optical density of the samples was measured at 750 nm wavelength and an average cell density for each sample was determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of the optical density at the starting point and the optical density at the end point of the process, divided by two. Afterwards, the average ethanol production per cell density was calculated.
Example 8
Performance Comparison of Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids #1646 and #1753 with #1578
The metabolically enhanced Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids #1646 and #1753 harboring the codon-optimized version of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Lyngbya sp. and, as a comparative example, the metabolically enhanced Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid #1578 harboring the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803, were characterized by the GC vial online method with regard to their acetaldehyde accumulation and ethanol production. FIG. 8A shows the corresponding graphical evaluation of the acetaldehyde accumulation in vol % over the monitored cultivation time of 40 hours. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean and standard deviation of four independent samples. Both hybrid strains harboring the Adh gene from Lyngbya sp. were able to maintain a very low acetaldehyde level of less than about 0.0001 vol % from the start of the cultivation which only increases to about 0.00025 vol % towards the end of the cultivation. In contrast, the comparative example of the hybrid strain harboring the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 rapidly accumulated acetaldehyde up to about 0.0005 vol % during the first 10 hours of cultivation. Thereafter, the acetaldehyde concentration continued to increase to about 0.0006 vol % towards the end of cultivation. FIG. 8B shows the corresponding graphical evaluation of the absolute ethanol production and FIG. 8C the corresponding relative ethanol production normalized to the cell density (OD750nm) over the monitored cultivation time of 40 hours. Each data point again represents the arithmetic mean and standard deviation of four independent samples. A similar productivity was observed with all three hybrid strains during 40 hours of cultivation. This trend is also reflected in the fitted production rates which were 0.001340 and 0.001349 vol % per OD and hour, respectively, for the hybrid strains harboring the Lyngbya sp. Adh enzyme, whereas a production rate of 0.001393 vol % per OD and hour has been determined for the comparative example harboring the synADH enzyme.
In conclusion, lower acetaldehyde accumulation and high ethanol production rates were accomplished with a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium harboring, for example, the Adh enzyme from Lyngbya sp. having a Km for acetaldehyde of 0.0058 mM, a Km for ethanol of 0.83 mM and a ratio Km (ethanol)/Km (acetaldehyde) of 143 in comparison to a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium harboring the synADH enzyme from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 having a Km for acetaldehyde of 0.35 mM, a Km for ethanol of 19 mM and a ratio Km ethanol/Km acetaldehyde) of 54.
Example 9
Performance Comparison of Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids #1754 and #1735 with #1578
Essentially as described in Example 8, but wherein the metabolically enhanced Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids #1754 and #1735 harboring the codon-optimized version of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Arthrospira platensis were compared with the hybrid #1578 harboring the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. FIG. 9A shows the results from the acetaldehyde accumulation. Both hybrid strains harboring the Adh gene from Arthrospira platensis were able to maintain a significantly lower acetaldehyde level of less than about 0.0002 vol % during the first 18 hours of cultivation in comparison to the hybrid strain harboring the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 which accumulated more than 0.0005 vol % acetaldehyde within the same period. The #1754 hybrid maintained a low acetaldehyde level of max. 0.00035 vol % until the end of cultivation, whereas the acetaldehyde level with #1735 amounted to approximately 0.0007 vol % after 40 hours. FIGS. 9B and 9C show the corresponding results from the ethanol production monitoring. Again, a similar productivity was observed with all three hybrid strains during the 40 hours cultivation. Accordingly, the observed production rates were 0.001425 and 0.001212 vol % per OD and hour, respectively, for the hybrid strains harboring the Arthrospira platensis Adh enzyme in comparison to the production rate of 0.001393 vol % per OD and hour of the comparative example harboring the synADH enzyme.
In conclusion, lower acetaldehyde accumulation and high ethanol production rates were accomplished with a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium harboring, for example, the Adh enzyme from Arthrospira platensis having a Km for acetaldehyde of 0.0023 mM, a Km for ethanol of 2.64 mM and a ratio Km (ethanol)/Km (acetaldehyde) of 1056 in comparison to a metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium harboring the synADH enzyme from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 having a Km for acetaldehyde of 0.35 mM, a Km for ethanol of 19 mM and a ratio Km ethanol/Km acetaldehyde) of 54.
Example 10
Correlation Between Adh Activity and Acetaldehyde/Ethanol Accumulation in Different Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids
The GC vial online method was used to compare the acetaldehyde to ethanol ratio during cultivation of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid strains harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1646, #1753 with the Adh enzyme from Lyngbya sp. or the ethanologenic plasmids #1754, #1735 with the Adh enzyme from Arthrospira platensis, respectively, with that of comparative strain #1578 harboring the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. In addition, the Adh activity of these hybrid strains was determined under acetaldehyde-saturating conditions after the GC vial experiments were completed. FIG. 10A is a column diagram showing the corresponding Adh activity in μmol/min·mg protein for the specified hybrid strains. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of two independent samples. A significantly higher Adh activity of approximately 0.37 μmol/min·mg protein was observed with the comparative hybrid expressing the synADH enzyme. The hybrids expressing the Lyngbya sp. or Arthrospira platensis Adh enzymes, respectively, exhibited significantly lower Adh activities between about 0.27 and 0.05 μmol/min·mg protein. FIG. 10B is a column diagram showing the acetaldehyde to ethanol ratio during cultivation of the corresponding hybrid strains averaged over at least three consecutive timepoints between cultivation hours 15-35. It was surprisingly found that, despite the significantly lower Adh activity levels of the hybrids expressing the Lyngbya sp. or Arthrospira platensis Adh enzymes in comparison to the synAdh activity of the comparative strain, a significantly lower acetaldehyde to ethanol ratio of about 0.4-0.5% was achieved with the hybrid strains #1646, #1753 and #1754 compared to the acetaldehyde to ethanol ratio of about 0.95% observed with the comparative strain. Remarkably, hybrid #1735 exhibiting an at least 7-fold lower Adh activity than the comparative strain still achieved an acetaldehyde to ethanol ratio that was with about 1.05% only marginally higher than that of the comparative strain. A low acetaldehyde to ethanol ratio is generally desirable because it indicates an efficient conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol, translating into high ethanol production rates and at the same time avoiding acetaldehyde accumulation with toxic effects to the cyanobacterial cells.
These results clearly demonstrate that the type of Adh enzyme with respect to its Km values for acetaldehyde and ethanol provided in the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell of the present invention can have an even higher positive impact on the ethanol production performance of the cyanobacterium than the gross Adh activity, i.e. the sum of expression level and turnover rate, of a conventionally enhanced cyanobacterial cell.
Example 11
Cell Growth and Total Ethanol Production in Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids #1684 and #1658
The ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid harboring the plasmid construct #1684 with the adh gene from Lyngbya sp. and, as a comparative example, the ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid harboring the plasmid construct #1658 with the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803, were cultivated in parallel in 1.2 liter vertical photobioreactors in biological duplicates using artificial seawater (ASW) BG-11 medium pH 7.3 with 35 practical salinity units and 200 μg/L kanamycin supplementation. Over a cultivation period of 30 days, a continuous 12 h day/12 h night cycle was maintained, wherein the day phase included a cultivation temperature of 37° C. and an illumination density of 125 μmol m−2 s−1 provided by an array of fluorescence bulbs, whereas the night phase included a cultivation temperature of 25° C. and no illumination. The cultures were aerated and mixed by continuous bubbling of air enriched with 15% CO2 at a gas flow rate of 38 ml/min including 15% CO2. Ethanol production was induced on day 0 of the cultivation by addition of nitrate provided in standard ASW BG-11 medium in 17.5 mM NaNO3 final concentration. On a daily basis, samples were withdrawn from each culture for OD750nm cell density measurements and analysis of the total ethanol concentration by a standard GC headspace measurement, as well as Adh and Pdc activity measurements.
The PDC activity assay is a photometric kinetic reaction that can be monitored at 340 nm using a spectrophotometer. Pyruvate is enzymatically converted to acetaldehyde by pyruvate decarboxylase, which is reduced to ethanol by ethanol dehydrogenase under NADH oxidation. The determined PDC activity is related to the protein content.
For the Pdc activity assay, 5-15 mL fresh culture material were spun down in a 15 mL tube at 5,000 g for 10 min at 4° C. The culture volume was adapted to an optical density: OD750<1: 20 ml, OD750 1-2: 15 ml, OD750 2-5: 5 ml, OD750>5: 3 ml culture as approximation. The pellet is resuspended in 0.9 mL pre-chilled (4° C.) purification buffer containing 50 mM MES, 100 μM EDTA, 1 mM TPP, 2 mM DTT, 0.025 mg/mL Lysozyme. 0.9 mL supernatant were taken to which 750 μL pre-chilled glass beads were added in a 2.0 ml safe-lock Eppendorf tube. Cell disruption was done with the mixer mill (Retsch) for 15 min at 30 Hz. The resulting suspension was incubated at 35° C. for 30 min in a thermomixer. Afterwards, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min and the supernatant was then used for the analysis.
The PDC activity measurement can be done in a photometer or in a plate reader. For the measurement in a cuvette 500 μL supernatant sample were mixed with 2 μL ADH in a concentration of 15 mg/mL and 463 μL of reaction buffer containing 43.2 mM MES buffer, 0.43 mM NADH, 10.8 mM CaCl2 in the cuvette. For the measurement in a plate reader, 20 μL supernatant sample were mixed with 173 μL of reaction buffer containing 23.1 mM MES buffer, 0.231 mM NADH, 5.8 mM CaCl2 and 0.031 mg/mL ADH in the microplate. The sample was incubated in the spectrophotometer or plate reader, respectively, until a stable baseline was observed, typically around 200 s.
The reaction was started by addition of 35 μL 300 mM pyruvate into the cuvette or 7 μl in each well of the 96 deep-well plate, respectively, and adsorption was recorded at a wavelength of 340 nm for 600 s. Oxidation of NADH was observed as a decrease of absorbance at 340 nm. Typical values from the bench top PBR were 100-300 nmol·min−1·mg−1 protein.
For calculating the specific PDC activity in the cell extract the protein amount in the supernatant based on the method Lowry et al. was determined, and for the sample preparation the DOC/TCA precipitation method was used (see above).
The graph shown in FIG. 11A illustrates the development of the cell culture density of the #1684 hybrid strain with the adh gene from Lyngbya sp. (square markers) and the comparative #1658 hybrid with the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 (diamond markers) over the monitored cultivation time. Data represent mean values and standard deviations from biological duplicates cultivated in vertical photobioreactors illuminated with 125 μE m−2 s−1 from one side. The growth characteristics of both hybrids were essentially identical to one another, leading to a final OD750nm of about 6.0 for the #1684 hybrid and about 5.3 for the #1658 hybrid. The corresponding development of the total ethanol content in the culture over the cultivation time is shown in FIG. 11B. As of about the third day of cultivation, a significantly higher ethanol content was observed in the culture of the #1684 hybrid strain (square markers) in comparison to the comparative #1658 hybrid strain. The difference continued to increase essentially until the end of cultivation. For example, at cultivation day 29, about 0.33 vol % ethanol was present in the culture of the #1684 hybrid strain, whereas only about 0.27 vol % were measured in the culture of the comparative #1658 hybrid strain, corresponding to approximately 20% increased ethanol yield with the metabolically enhanced hybrid strain according to the present invention expressing the Lyngbya sp. Adh enzyme in comparison to the strain harboring the state-of-the art synAdh enzyme. FIG. 11C shows a complementary plot of the ethanol content normalized per cell density over the cultivation time. It can be derived that, on average, with this vPBR system illuminated from one side with 125 μE m−2 s−1 a gain of approximately 0.01-0.015 vol % ethanol per OD750nm was achieved with the metabolically enhanced hybrid strain of the present invention (square markers) in comparison to the comparative hybrid strain (diamond markers).
FIGS. 12A and 12B show graphical evaluations of the concomitant Pdc and Adh activity measurements in μmol per min and mg protein over the 30 days of cultivation. While no significant differences were observed in Pdc activity, a significantly lower Adh activity was observed throughout the cultivation in the metabolically enhanced #1684 hybrid strain expressing the Lyngbya sp. Adh enzyme in comparison to the comparative #1658 hybrid strain expressing the synADH enzyme.
In conclusion, the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium of the present invention can outperform a conventionally enhanced cyanobacterium in terms of cell growth as well as relative and absolute ethanol production already at relatively low Adh activity levels.
Example 12
Cell Growth and Total Ethanol Production in Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids #1760 and #1578
Essentially as described Example 11, but with the ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid harboring the plasmid construct #1760 with the adh gene from Arthrospira platensis and, as a comparative example, the ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid harboring the plasmid construct #1578 with the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 cultivated over a period of 21 days.
The graph shown in FIG. 13A illustrates the development of the cell culture density of the #1760 hybrid strain with the adh gene from Arthrospira platensis (square markers) and the comparative #1578 hybrid with the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 (circle markers) over the monitored cultivation time. The growth characteristics of both hybrids were similar to each other, leading to a OD750nm after 21 days of about 4.9 for the #1760 hybrid and about 5.1 for the #1578 hybrid. The corresponding development of the total ethanol content in the culture over the cultivation time is shown in FIG. 13B. As of about the eighth day of cultivation, a higher ethanol content was observed in the culture of the #1760 hybrid strain (square markers) in comparison to the comparative #1578 hybrid strain. The difference increased with further cultivation time and maintained constant until the end of cultivation. For example, at cultivation day 21, about 0.325 vol % ethanol was present in the culture of the #1760 hybrid strain, whereas only about 0.28 vol % were measured in the culture of the comparative #1578 hybrid strain, corresponding to approximately 14% increased ethanol yield with the metabolically enhanced hybrid strain according to the present invention expressing the Arthrospira platensis Adh enzyme in comparison to the strain harboring the state-of-the art synAdh enzyme. FIG. 13C shows a complementary plot of the ethanol content normalized per cell density over the cultivation time. It can be derived that, on average, with this vPBR system illuminated from one side with 125 μE m−2 s−1 a gain of approximately 0.01-0.017 vol % ethanol per OD750nm was achieved with the metabolically enhanced hybrid strain of the present invention (square markers) in comparison to the comparative hybrid strain (circle markers).
FIGS. 14A and 14B show graphical evaluations of the concomitant Pdc and Adh activity measurements in μmol per min and mg protein over the 21 days of cultivation. While no clear differences were observed in Pdc activity between both hybrids, a significantly lower Adh activity was observed throughout the cultivation in the metabolically enhanced #1760 hybrid strain expressing the Arthrospira platensis Adh enzyme in comparison to the comparative #1578 hybrid strain expressing the synADH enzyme.
These results further confirm that the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium of the present invention can outperform a conventionally enhanced cyanobacterium in terms of relative and absolute ethanol production already at relatively low Adh activity levels.
Example 13
Measurement of Activity and Kinetic Constants of the Alcohol Dehydrogenase Enzyme from Lyngbya sp. for C3-C10 Aldehydes
Essentially as described in Example 4, but wherein propanal (C3), butanal (C4), pentanal (C5), hexanal (C6), heptanal (C7) octanal (C8) and decanal (C10) were used as substrates instead of acetaldehyde. As an example, FIG. 15A show the result from the graphical computation of the Michaelis constants Km for propanal of the alcohol dehydrogenase from Lyngbya sp. with amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 1. The Vmax corresponds to approximately 0.035 μmol per mg protein and min and the Km value corresponds to 0.0053·10−3 M which is even slightly lower than the determined Km value for acetaldehyde of 0.006·10−3 M of this enzyme. FIG. 15B is a column diagram showing the specific activity of the alcohol dehydrogenase from Lyngbya sp. for the conversion of the above-listed C3-C10 aldehydes in comparison to the conversion of acetaldehyde. It can be derived that all of the tested C3-C10 aldehydes were efficiently converted by the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme with a specific activity of about 2 μmol/mg protein·min at a substrate concentration of 0.1 mM. This is only slightly lower than the specific activity of about 2.7 μmol/mg protein·min determined for the corresponding conversion of acetaldehyde.
In conclusion, the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterium of the present invention can be efficiently used for production of a C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9 and/or C10 alcohols.
Example 14
Correlation Between Adh Activity and Cell Viability of Different Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium Sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids
A useful indicator of the vitality of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell is, for example, the pigmentation of the cell during or after ethanol production. Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the #1606, #1578, #1646, #1652, #1754 and #1760 plasmid constructs as well as a wild-type Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 for comparative purposes were cultivated in GC vials as described before in example 7. After measurement of the optical density at 750 nm, needed for calculation of the cell normalized ethanol production (EtOH/OD) cell suspensions were adjusted to an OD750nm of 1.4 and the whole cell absorption spectra from 400 nm-750 nm was recorded using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2450) and an integrating sphere (Shimadzu ISR-2200). From the recorded spectra, the relative phycocyanin pigmentation was determined at 620 nm wavelength, the relative chlorophyll pigmentation was determined at 680 nm wavelength and the relative carotenoid pigmentation was determined at 490 nm wavelength. From the relative pigment contents the corresponding PC/Chl and Car/PC ratios were calculated. A reduced relative PC/Chl ratio and a significantly increased relative Car/PC ratio in comparison to a corresponding wild-type cell are typical indicators of reduced cell viability and increased stress. The results are shown in FIGS. 16A and 16B. The hybrid strains #1646 and #1652 expressing the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Lyngbya sp. and the hybrid strains #1754 and #1760 expressing the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Arthrospira platensis exhibited a relative PC/Chl ratio which was essentially identical with that of the wild type strain and higher than that of the comparative hybrid strains #1606 and #1578 expressing the state-of-the-art synAdh enzyme (FIG. 16A). These results confirmed a superior viability of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells for the production of ethanol of the present invention in comparison to a conventionally enhanced cyanobacterial cell. The hybrid strain #1645 expressing the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Synechococcus sp. exhibited a PC/Chl ratio which is about 13% lower than that of the wild-type strain and shows that the vitality of this hybrid was also little affected by the ethanol production. Likewise, the relative Car/PC ratio (FIG. 16B) that was determined for hybrid strains #1646 and #1652 expressing the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Lyngbya sp. and the hybrid strain #1760 expressing the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Arthrospira platensis was essentially identical to that of the wild-type strain, confirming the superior viability of these metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells of the present invention in comparison to the comparative hybrid strains expressing the synAdh enzyme which exhibited an increase in the relative Car/PC ratio between about 11% and 43% in comparison to the wild type strain. The relative Car/PC ratio of the hybrid strain #1754 was about 10% increased in comparison to the wild-type cell, demonstrating a vitality that was still close to that of the wild type cyanobacterium and little affected by the ethanol production.
The cell viability results correlated well with an enhanced relative ethanol production rate per cell density (FIG. 18A) and a reduced acetaldehyde/ethanol ratio (FIG. 18B) achieved with the hybrids #1646, #1652, #1754 and #1760 of the present invention expressing the alcohol dehydrogenase gene from Lyngbya sp. or Arthrospira platensis, respectively. With all of these strains a significantly higher relative ethanol production rate per cell density was achieved in comparison to the comparative strains expressing the synAdh enzyme. While all of the tested hybrid strains exhibited essentially comparable Pdc activities (FIG. 19A), it is a remarkable and surprising result that the favorable effects achieved with the metabolically enhanced hybrids of the present invention were already achieved at relatively low Adh activity levels (FIG. 19B). In particular the lower Adh activity levels of constructs #1646, #1754 and #1760 in comparison to the comparative hybrids #1606 or #1578 demonstrated that the specific Km values for acetaldehyde and ethanol of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell of the present invention can have an even higher positive impact on the cell viability and ethanol production performance of the cyanobacterium than the gross Adh activity, i.e. the sum of expression level and turnover rate, of a conventionally enhanced cyanobacterial cell. Therefore, it can be concluded that even further improved effects can be achieved when the gross activity of the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme of the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cell of the present invention is further increased, for example by increasing the Adh expression level.
Example 15
Influence of the Promoter Type on Adh Activity and Acetaldehyde/Ethanol Accumulation in Different Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids
The GC vial online method was used to investigate the acetaldehyde accumulation and ethanol production during cultivation of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid strains harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1646, #1750 and #1791 with the Adh enzyme from Lyngbya sp. under the control of the Prbc, PrpsL and PcpcB promoter, respectively. Hybrid strains harboring the ethanologenic plasmids TK293, #1578 and #1792 with the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 under the control of the Prbc, PrpsL and PcpcB promoter, respectively, served as comparative examples. In addition, the Adh and Pdc activity of these hybrid strains was determined.
FIG. 26B shows the development of the ethanol content per OD in the cultures over the cultivation time. Data represent mean values and standard deviations of four independent samples. Over the monitored period of about 32 hours, similar ethanol productions rates were observed with strains harboring plasmids #1646, #1750 and #1791 as well as the reference strain harboring plasmid #1578, with slightly better rates of the former strains expressing the Adh enzyme from Lyngbya sp. The reference strain with plasmid #1792 and, in particular, the reference strain with plasmid TK293 expressing the synADH gene from Synechocystis sp. exhibited comparatively lower ethanol productivity.
FIG. 27A shows the corresponding acetaldehyde accumulation results. The comparative strains expressing the synADH enzyme under the control of the PrpsL or Prbc promoter accumulated between about 200-500% more acetaldehyde than the strains expressing the Adh enzyme from Lyngbya sp. or the reference strain expressing the synADH enzyme under the control of the PcpcB promoter. As noted above, a low acetaldehyde level is desirable because it indicates an efficient conversion of acetaldehyde into ethanol and, at the same time, avoids toxic effects of acetaldehyde to the cyanobacterial cells.
FIG. 27B is a column diagram showing the corresponding Adh activity in μmol/min·mg protein for the specified hybrid strains. Relatively low activity levels were observed when the strains expressed either the Adh from Lyngbya sp. or the synAdh under the control of the PrpsL or the Prbc promoter. Significantly increased Adh activity was observed when the hybrid strains expressed the Adh enzyme under the transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter. Notably, the expression of synAdh under control of the PcpcB promoter in the reference strain harboring plasmid #1792 still resulted in about 700% higher Adh activity than the expression of the Lyngbya sp. Adh enzyme under control of the same PcpcB promoter in the strain harboring plasmid #1791, i.e. 8.54 μmol/min·mg versus 1.2 μmol/min·mg.
Thus, due to the low Km for acetaldehyde of the Adh enzymes of the present invention, a comparatively low gross Adh activity is already sufficient to maintain lower acetaldehyde accumulation in the culture, while at the same time a higher level of ethanol production is achieved. Conversely, conventional Adh enzymes such as the synAdh require much higher gross Adh activity in order to compensate for their lower substrate affinity to acetaldehyde. Thus, a very high expression of the conventional Adh enzymes is required to achieve similar low acetaldehyde accumulation and high ethanol production as with the Adh enzymes of the present invention. This may for instance be achieved by driving the expression of the conventional Adh enzyme with a strong promoter such as the PcpcB promoter.
However, a very high expression of a recombinant Adh enzyme imposes a tremendous metabolic burden on the ethanol-producing cyanobacterial host cell. For example, 3-5% of the total cell protein may be directed towards the overexpression of the Adh enzyme, to the expense and imbalance of other important anabolic and catabolic pathways. Moreover, the overabundance of the recombinant Adh enzyme can further undesirable side reactions in which the enzyme unspecifically reduces substrates other than acetaldehyde. All of these effects can be detrimental to the viability, longevity and productivity of the ethanol producing cyanobacterial host cell.
It is therefore a particular advantage that with the Adh enzymes of the present invention favorable acetaldehyde accumulation and ethanol production properties are achieved already at low Adh activity levels, because in this way the host cell's metabolic burden and the risk of undesirable side reactions can also be kept low without dispensing with ethanol yield.
Example 16
Adh Activity, Ethanol Production and Acetaldehyde Accumulation in Different Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids with the Adh Gene Under Transcriptional Control of the PcpcB Promoter
The GC vial online method was used to investigate the acetaldehyde accumulation and ethanol production during cultivation of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid strains harboring the ethanologenic plasmid #1790 with the Adh enzyme from Arthrospira platensis, #1791 with the Adh enzyme from Lyngbya sp., #1792 with the synAdh as a reference, #1793 with the Adh enzyme from Synechococcus sp. and #1795 with the Adh enzyme from Cyanothece sp., all of which have the respective adh gene under transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter. A hybrid strain harboring the plasmid #1578 with the synadh gene under control of the Prbc promoter was used as an additional reference. In addition, the Adh activity of these hybrid strains was determined.
The Adh activity measurements (FIG. 28A) show that the highest Adh activity was again detected in the reference hybrid harboring the plasmid #1792 with the synAdh under control of the strong PcpcB promoter. Medium Adh activity levels were detected in the hybrids harboring the plasmid #1791 and #1793 with the Adh enzymes from Lyngbya sp. and Synechococcus sp., respectively. The Adh enzymes from Arthrospira platensis (#1790) and Cyanothece sp. (#1795) exhibited the lowest activity levels of the PcpcB controlled enzymes, which was comparable to that of the reference strain harboring the plasmid #1578 with the synadh gene under control of the Prbc promoter.
FIG. 28B shows the corresponding ethanol production per OD over the cultivation time. Despite the big differences in the Adh activity (see above), all strains exhibited essentially comparable ethanol production during the monitored 40 hours of cultivation.
The observed acetaldehyde accumulation with the hybrid strains is shown in FIG. 29A. The acetaldehyde accumulation is substantially lower for the strains expressing the Adh enzyme under the control of the PcpcB promoter than for the reference strain expressing the synAdh under control of the Prbc promoter. The lowest acetaldehyde levels were observed in the strains expressing the Arthrospira platensis and Lyngbya sp. Adh enzymes (#1790, #1791).
These results demonstrate that metabolic enhancement of cyanobacterial cells according to the present invention by incorporating an Adh enzyme having Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde which is lower than 0.08·10−3 M (e.g. from Arthrospira platensis, Lyngbya sp. or Cyanothece sp.; #1790, #1791, #1795), or having a Michaelis constant Km for acetaldehyde which is higher than 0.65·10−3 M but lower than 10·10−3 M in combination with a Michaelis constant Km for ethanol which is higher than 20·10−3 M (e.g. from Synechococcus sp.; #1793) leads to a high level of ethanol formation. This is due to the fact that the recombinant alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes of the present invention are capable of maintaining a low acetaldehyde level in the culture and/or tolerate high ethanol product concentrations with substantially reduced back-reaction already at comparatively low activity levels.
Example 17
Long-Term Cultivation in 0.5 L Photobioreactors (PBRs) and 1.2 L Vertical Photobioreactors (vPBRs)
1. Cultivation in 0.5 L PBRs
For scale up, the culture was maintained under repressed conditions, using mBG11 (35 psu) with ammonium and urea (2 mM of each) instead of nitrate as nitrogen source, 5 mM TES was used as buffer. For plasmid maintenance and contamination control, kanamycin (150 mg L-1) was used. For induction, cells were switched back to normal mBG11 with nitrate and no ammonium/urea. Cells were cultivated in 0.5 L round Schott bottles. Mixing was achieved using a magnetic stir bar at continuous 250 rpm. The gas flow rate was continuously 15 ml min-1 with CO2 enriched air (5% CO2). A light/dark period of 12 h:12 h was applied. Illumination of cultures was done with fluorescence lamps (Sylvana Grolux FHO 39W/T5/GRO). The cultures were illuminated from two sides with a photon flux density (PFD) of 230 μE m−2 s−1 each.
2. Cultivation in 1.2 L Vertical vPBRs
The strains were scaled up in 1 liter mBG11 with 0.5% continuous CO2 supply and continuous illumination with an intensity of 200-300 μmol photons m−2 s−1. The strains were cultivated under repressed conditions in media containing 2 mM ammonium and 2 mM urea as the nitrogen source. Furthermore 200 mg/L kanamycin was added and 5 mM TES buffer was used to keep the pH at 8.0.
1.2 L vPBRs were inoculated at a cell density of OD750nm=0.5 in mBG-11 medium (35 psu) containing kanamycin (200 mg/L). The strains were cultivated at pH 7.3±0.01. CO2 (15% CO2 in air) was injected into the liquid phase in a pH controlled manner with continuous aeration (38 mL/min). The vPBRs were illuminated from one side using fluorescent bulbs with a photon flux density (PFD) of 230 μmol photons m−2 s−1 during the photoperiod of 12 hours. The temperature profile ranged from 25° C. at night and 37° C. during daytime. An average value of 2.5% ethanol vapor loss per day was assumed in order to compensate for the ethanol loss through vapor phase. The value 2.5% was calculated from several evaporation tests with ethanol spiked medium in vPBRs under these standardized conditions, where the decline of ethanol in the liquid phase had been determined experimentally. Nutrition was added several times during the cultivation. Ethanol production rates were calculated by subtracting ethanol values from the first day (due to lag phase) and the last day divided by the number of cultivation days.
Example 18
Genetic Integrity of Adh Enzyme Expression Cassettes in Ethanologenic Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 Hybrids
Long-term cultivation of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrids harboring the reference plasmids #1792, #1784 and #1835, each containing an expression cassette with the synAdh gene under transcriptional control of the PcpcB promoter, unexpectedly showed a loss of Adh activity and ethanol production after a only few days of cultivation. For example, the recovery and subsequent PCR analysis of the plasmid #1784 from the cultures after loss of the Adh activity initially indicated that gene deletions of various lengths occurred in the synAdh gene (FIG. 29B). While the full length PCR product of the synAdh has a size of about 1400 bp (bold arrow), specific synAdh PCR amplificates of smaller size due to deletions of about 490 bp and 680 bp (thin arrows) were obtained after the observed Adh activity loss.
Subsequently, the genetic integrity of the Adh enzymes from Lyngbya sp. and Synechococcus sp. of the present invention (plasmids #1791, #1793 and #1938) and, as a representative comparative example, of the synAdh enzyme (plasmid #1835) were studied in more detail during ethanologenic cultivation in 1.2 L vertical vPBRs.
The results are shown in FIGS. 30A through 32A. FIG. 30A depicts the cell density in the different cultures in relation to the cultivation time. The cyanobacteria expressing the Adh enzymes of the present invention (i.e. plasmids #1791, #1793 and #1938) exhibited an essentially constant growth over the monitored 35 days of cultivation. In contrast, the cell growth was significantly impaired in cyanobacteria harboring the plasmid #1835 with the synAdh enzyme under the control of the strong PcpcB promoter, presumably due to the high metabolic strain imposed on the cells by the overexpression of the synAdh. The cell viability of the cells was so defective that the cultivation of the cells harboring the plasmid #1835 had to be terminated on day 12. FIG. 30B shows the corresponding ethanol accumulation during the cultivation. After about 3-4 days of cultivation, the ethanol accumulation deteriorated in the cell culture harboring the plasmid #1835, whereas the cell cultures expressing the Adh enzymes of the present invention continued to accumulate ethanol at a constant rate until the end of the cultivation after 34 days. Determination of the chlorophyll/OD ratio of cyanobacterial cells during the cultivation (FIG. 31A) confirmed a strongly decreasing pigmentation of the cells expressing the synAdh under control of the PcpcB promoter, which is characteristic of a rapid loss of cell vitality. In contrast, relatively constant chlorophyll/OD ratios were present in the cells expressing the Adh enzymes of the present invention under the control of the PcpcB promoter, confirming that with these Adh enzymes the cells are less affected by the recombinant Adh expression and ethanol production and have a vitality that is closer to that of a corresponding wild type cyanobacterium. The measured Adh activity in the cultures is shown in FIG. 31B. The Adh activity in cells harboring the plasmid #1835 was almost completely lost after only about 8 days of cultivation, whereas only a comparatively moderate decrease in Adh activity was observed in the strains harboring the plasmids #1791, #1793 and #1938 with the Adh enzymes of the present invention.
PCR analysis of the recovered #1835 plasmids after cultivation confirmed genetic deletions in the synAdh gene of about 800 and 400 base pairs in length (FIG. 32A). Subsequent sequencing of the defective synAdh genes showed that the deletions comprised the region from bases 2671-2923 and 2725-3371 of the synAdh gene, respectively.
In conclusion, ethanol production with cyanobacterial cells harboring a recombinant PcpcB-synAdh expression cassette suffers from a rapid loss and/or inactivation of the synAdh gene due to partial gene deletions. The gene deletions are likely to occur due to the genetic pressure imposed on the cells as a result of the metabolic burden and harmful unspecific side reactions caused by the overexpression and overabundance of the synAdh enzyme. Accordingly, it is an unexpected and surprising effect that the metabolically enhanced cyanobacterial cells according to the present invention have improved genetic stability with respect to the recombinantly overexpressed adh gene in comparison to conventionally enhanced cyanobacterial cells overexpressing the state of the art synAdh enzyme. In particular, it is a favorable effect of the present invention that the expression of the Adh enzyme (e.g. from Lyngbya sp. or Synechococcus sp.) can be controlled by the PcpcB promoter, because this promoter is a particularly strong and reliable promoter in cyanobacteria such as the Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311.
Example 19
Ethanol Production Rates of Various PTA-13311 Hybrids in 0.5 L Photobioreactors and Ethanol Accumulation During Long-Term Cultivation in 1.2 L Vertical Photobioreactors
The protocols described in Example 17 were used to investigate the ethanol production during cultivation of Cyanobacterium sp. PTA-13311 hybrid strains harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1791 (Adh enzyme from Lyngbya sp.), #1793 (Adh enzyme from Synechococcus sp.), #1795 (Adh enzyme from Cyanothece sp.), #1815 (Adh enzyme from Chroococcidiopsis sp.) and #1831 (Adh enzyme from Synechococcus sp.). Hybrid strains harboring the ethanologenic plasmids #1578 and #1792 with the synAdh gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 served as comparative examples.
Tables 4 and 5 provide a summary of the average ethanol production rates observed in the 0.5 L PBRs over 21 days of cultivation for the different hybrid strains with and without preliminary ethanol spiking.







TABLE 4







Summary of average ethanol production rates over 21 days 


of strains with plasmids #1791 and #1795 in 0.5 L PBRs in comparison 


to the reference strain with plasmid #1792.










unspiked
0.4% EtOH












% (v/v)

% (v/v)



Strain
EtOH/day
% of #1792
EtOH/day
% of #1792





#1792 (synADH)
0.0325
100%
0.0280
100%


#1791 (ADH111)
0.0415
128%
0.0310
111%


#1795 (ADH553)
0.0350
108%
0.0251
 90%
















TABLE 5







Summary of ethanol production rates of strains with plasmids 


#1793, #1815 and #1831 in 0.5 L PBRs in comparison to the


reference strain with plasmid #1792.










unspiked
0.4% EtOH












% (v/v)

% (v/v)



Strain
EtOH/day
% of #1792
EtOH/day
% of #1792














#1792 (synADH)
0.0370
100%
0.0332
100%


#1793 (ADH916)
0.0365
 99%
0.0299
 90%


#1815 (ADH1102)
0.0409
111%
0.0329
 99%


#1831 (ADH213)
0.0392
106%
0.0340
102%









The long term cultivation results of the total ethanol production in the 1.2 L vPBRs are summarized in FIG. 32B. Notably, the ethanol yield after 32 cultivation days is between about 25% and about 48% higher with the cyanobacterial strains of the present invention in comparison to the state-of-the-art reference strain.
The scope of protection of the invention is not limited to the examples given hereinabove. The invention is embodied in each novel characteristic and each combination of characteristics, which particularly includes every combination of any features which are stated in the claims, even if this feature or this combination of features is not explicitly stated in the claims or in the examples.

## Claims

1. A cyanobacterial cell for the production of ethanol, comprising:
at least one recombinant gene encoding a pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme (Pdc) converting pyruvate to acetaldehyde, and
at least one recombinant gene encoding a first Zn2+ dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (Adh) converting acetaldehyde to ethanol, wherein the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme has an amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to an Adh amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, and SEQ ID NO: 8;
wherein the transcription of both the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme and the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is controlled by a single promoter.

2. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 1, wherein said single promoter is an inducible promoter.

3. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 1, wherein the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme is arranged upstream of the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme.

4. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 1, wherein the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is arranged upstream of the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme.

5. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 4, wherein the transcription of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene occurs before transcription of the pyruvate decarboxylase gene.

6. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 1, wherein the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme activity is higher than the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme activity.

7. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 1, wherein ethanol is produced in an amount that is at least 0.017% (v/v) per day over a period of at least 30 days.

8. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 2, wherein the inducible promoter is an endogenous promoter.

9. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 2, wherein the inducible promoter is a metal-inducible promoter.

10. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 9, wherein the metal inducible promoter is selected from the group consisting of PziaA (SEQ ID NO: 38), PaztA (SEQ ID NO: 40), PsmtA (SEQ ID NO: 39), PcorT (SEQ ID NO: 41), PnrsB (SEQ ID NO: 42), Porf0316 (SEQ ID NO: 67), and PpetJ (SEQ ID NO: 43).

11. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 2, wherein the inducible promoter is a nitrate-inducible promoter.

12. The cyanobacterial cell of claim 11, wherein the nitrate-inducible promoter is selected from the group consisting of PnirA, PnrtA, and PnarB.

13. A method for producing ethanol in a cyanobacterial cell, comprising:
a) providing a cyanobacterial cell of claim 1;
b) growing said cyanobacterial cell in a culture medium suitable for producing ethanol; and
c) obtaining ethanol from the culture medium.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the single promoter is an inducible promoter.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme is arranged upstream of the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the recombinant gene encoding the alcohol dehydrogenase is arranged upstream of the recombinant gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the transcription of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene occurs before transcription of the pyruvate decarboxylase gene.

18. The method of claim 13, wherein the pyruvate decarboxylase enzyme activity is higher than the alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme activity.

19. The method of claim 13, wherein ethanol is produced in an amount that is at least 0.017% (v/v) per day over a period of at least 30 days.

20. The method of claim 14, wherein the inducible promoter is an endogenous promoter.

21. The method of 14, wherein the inducible promoter is a metal-inducible promoter.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the metal inducible promoter is selected from the group consisting of PziaA (SEQ ID NO: 38), PaztA (SEQ ID NO: 40), PsmtA (SEQ ID NO: 39), PcorT (SEQ ID NO: 41), PnrsB (SEQ ID NO: 42), Porf0316 (SEQ ID NO: 67), and PpetJ (SEQ ID NO: 43).

23. The method of claim 14, wherein the inducible promoter is a nitrate-inducible promoter.

24. The method of claim 23, wherein the nitrate-inducible promoter is selected from the group consisting of PnirA, PnrtA, and PnarB.