alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of The Sports Authority, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of The Sports Authority, Inc.
on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of The Sports Authority, Inc. This written statement is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to The Sports Authority, Inc. and
will be retained by The Sports Authority, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: April 15, 2004 |  | /s/JOHN DOUGLAS MORTONJohn Douglas Morton
Vice-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
The Sports Authority, Inc.                                
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 15, 2004 |  | /s/THOMAS T. HENDRICKSONThomas T. Hendrickson
Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer
The Sports Authority, Inc.



QuickLinks
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 4 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARIANO HERNANDEZ-MUNIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 01-2068 & 01-2107

(D.C. No. CIV-00-777-BB/KBM)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before EBEL , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

these appeals. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cases are

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Mariano Hernandez-Muniz, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, requests a

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

habeas petition. He appeals separately the district court’s ruling on the merits of

his petition and its later refusal to grant him a COA. 

To obtain a COA, Hernandez-Muniz must make “a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). This court has

reviewed his request for a COA, his appellate brief, the district court’s order, as

well as the entire record before us. We conclude that his petition does not meet

the standard quoted above.

We GRANT Hernandez-Muniz’s motion to amend his application for a

certificate of appealability. We DENY the request for a certificate of

appealability and DISMISS these appeals. 

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe 

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,700,730
<SECURITIES>                                23,947,764
<RECEIVABLES>                               34,941,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                15,213,636
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,490,262
<PP&E>                                       5,494,670
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,913,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,233,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,152,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,889
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,691,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,233,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,170,279
<CGS>                                       14,549,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,173,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               616,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,132,255
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (759,376)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,114,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (803,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,154,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,154,855)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. JS/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P A N C H O S C O R P O R A T I O N , aF l or i da c orpor a t i on, P la in tif

f - c o u n te r d e f

e n d an t - A pp el l ee , v. GU AD ALUPE B EDOY A G ON ZALE Z; A N A M A R IA JO S E F IN A B O JA L IL B E DO YA , D efen d an t s-co u n t ercl ai m an t s - A p p el l an t s, and SI M O N LO PEZ, a n i n d i v i du a l ; TEA TRO L O S P IN O S , a b u si n ess en t i ty, D efen d an t s. N o. 07- 56258 D . C. N o . CV - 0 3 - 0 3 0 0 2 - G PS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e or ge P . S c hi a ve l l i , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng 

# FI LED JAN 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a)(2 ). A cco rd i n g l y, c ount e r c l a i m ant s ’ r e que s tf oror a l a r gum e nti s de ni e d. J S/ Res ea r ch 07- 56258 2 S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G uadal up e B edoya G on za l ez and A na M ar i a J osef i na B oj al i l B edoya app ea l fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderdi sm i ss i ng thei r c ou nt er cl ai m pu rs uantt o F eder al R u le o f C iv il P r o c e du r e 4 1 ( b ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , P a g ta lu n a n v. G a la za , 2 9 1 F .3 d6 3 9 , 6 4 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) , a n dw e a f

f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd is m is s in g th e c o u n te r c la im because c ou nt er cl ai m ant s f ai l ed t o com pl y f

ul l y w i th the court ’ s ordert o “ proceed by defaul t ” a ft erthe courti m po se d l es s dra st i c s anct i on s and w arned them that n o n c o m p lian c e w o u ldr e s u lt in d is m is s a l. Se e id. a t 6 4 2 ( lis tin g f a c to r s th a t a d is tr ic t c o u rt m u s t w e ig h b e f o r e d is m is s in g a n a c tio n u n d e rR u le 4 1 ( b ) ) . W e de c l i ne t o c ons i de rw he the rthe di s tr i c tc ourtabus e d i t s di s c r e t i on by de ny i ng the m ot i ons f

orr e c ons i de r a t i on unde rR ul e s 59( e ) a nd 60( b) be c aus e the is s u e w a s n o t ar g u e do n ap p e a l. Se e I nde p. T ow e rs of W as h. v . W as hi ngton , 350 F . 3d 925, 929 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( de e m i ng abandone d i s s ue s r a i s e d butnota r gue d onJ S/ Res ea r ch 07- 56258 3 appeal ). AF F I RME D.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2125 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2125

 To make an exception to the United States embargo on trade with Cuba 
   for the export of medicines or medical supplies, instruments, or 
                               equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 1993

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make an exception to the United States embargo on trade with Cuba 
   for the export of medicines or medical supplies, instruments, or 
                               equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO EMBARGO AUTHORITY IN THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT 
              OF 1961.

    Section 620(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2370(a)(1)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the 
second sentence the following: ``, except that any such embargo shall 
not apply with respect to the export of any medicines or medical 
supplies, instruments, or equipment''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXISTING RESTRICTIONS ON TRADE WITH CUBA.

    Upon the enactment of this Act, any regulation, proclamation, or 
provision of law, including Presidential Proclamation 3447 of February 
3, 1962, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR 368-399), and 
Cuban Assets Control Regulations (31 CFR 515), that prohibits exports 
to Cuba or transactions involving exports to Cuba and that is in effect 
on the date of the enactment of this Act, shall not apply with respect 
to the export to Cuba of medicines or medical supplies, instruments, or 
equipment.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON THE FUTURE EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.

    (a) Export Administration Act of 1979.--After the enactment of this 
Act, the President may not exercise the authorities contained in the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 to restrict the exportation to Cuba 
of medicines or medical supplies, instruments, or equipment, except to 
the extent such restrictions would be permitted under section 5 of that 
Act for goods containing parts or components subject to export controls 
under such section.
    (b) International Emergency Economic Powers Act.--After the 
enactment of this Act, the President may not exercise the authorities 
contained in section 203 of the International Emergency Economic Powers 
Act to restrict the export to Cuba of medicines or medical supplies, 
instruments, or equipment, to the extent such authorities are exercised 
to deal with a threat to the foreign policy or economy of the United 
States.

                                 <all>
```
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2205

AN ACT

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise

and extend programs relating to trauma care.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2205

AN ACT

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend

programs relating to trauma care.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trauma Care Systems

5 Amendments of 1993’’.
2

•HR 2205 EH

1 SEC. 2. REVISIONS IN PROGRAMS RELATING TO TRAUMA

2 CARE.

3 (a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 1201(a) of the

4 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d) is amended

5 in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting after

6 ‘‘Secretary’’ the following: ‘‘, acting through the Director

7 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,’’.

8 (b) REPORTS BY STATES; EVALUATIONS BY COMP9 TROLLER GENERAL.—Section 1216(c) of the Public

10 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d–16) is amended by

11 striking ‘‘1993’’ and inserting ‘‘1994’’.

12 (c) REPORT BY SECRETARY.—Section 1222 of the

13 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d–22) is amend14 ed—

15 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘1992’’

16 and inserting ‘‘1995’’; and

17 (2) by inserting after the first sentence the fol18 lowing sentence: ‘‘Such report shall include an as19 sessment of the extent to which Federal and State

20 efforts to develop systems of trauma care and to

21 designate trauma centers have reduced the incidence

22 of mortality, and the incidence of permanent disabil23 ity, resulting from trauma.’’.

24 (d) WAIVER REGARDING PURPOSE OF GRANTS.—

25 Section 1233 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.

26 300d–33) is repealed.
3

•HR 2205 EH

1 (e) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—Title XII of the

2 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d et seq.) is

3 amended—

4 (1) in section 1204(c), by inserting before the

5 period the following: ‘‘determines to be necessary to

6 carry out this section’’;

7 (2) in section 1212(a)(2)(A), by striking

8 ‘‘1211(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘1211(b)’’;

9 (3) in section 1213(a)—

10 (A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘Act’’

11 and inserting ‘‘Act)’’;

12 (B) in paragraphs (8) and (9), by striking

13 ‘‘to provide’’ each place such term appears and

14 inserting ‘‘provides for’’; and

15 (C) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘to con16 duct’’ and inserting ‘‘conducts’’; and

17 (4) in section 1231(3), by striking ‘‘Rico;’’ and

18 inserting ‘‘Rico,’’.

19 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

20 Section 1232(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42

21 U.S.C. 300d–32(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘for the pur22 pose’’ and all that follows and inserting the following:

23 ‘‘For the purpose of carrying out parts A and B, there
4

•HR 2205 EH

1 is authorized to be appropriated $15,000,000 for each of

2 the fiscal years 1994 through 1996.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.8.8





Quaker City
Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Harold Rams dated July 1, 2002.





QUAKER CITY BANK


CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


RENEWAL AND
EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT





Name of Participant:    Harold Rams





The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly scheduled meeting on June 25, 2002, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank acted to renew and extend the Quaker City
Bank Change in Control Agreement with the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30, 2004.





Dated this
            1st             day of
            July            , A.D.,
            2002            .





QUAKER CITY BANK/s/    HAROLD RAMS



By:

/s/    FREDERIC R.
MCGILLParticipant





President
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                               G&L Realty Corp.
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                          Annual Report on Form 10-K
                               December 31, 1998
                                (In thousands)
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                           <C>
Net Income (earnings)                                         $ 4,313
                                                              =======
Fixed Charges:
--------------
 Interest expense                                               8,495
 Capitalized interest                                             545
 Amortization of deferred financing costs                         188
                                                              -------
Total fixed charges                                           $ 9,228
                                                              =======

Total Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends:
--------------------------------------------
 Total fixed charges                                          $ 9,228
 Preferred dividends                                            7,381
                                                              -------
Total fixed charges and preferred dividends                   $16,609
                                                              =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends      0.82x
                                                              =======
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 2, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City(D. Michael Manies, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Winter Trust of 12/3/1974; Ottawa, Kansas, and Peoples, Inc., 
Colorado Springs, Colorado; to acquire Peoples Mortgage Corporation, 
Colorado Springs, Colorado, and thereby engage in mortgage lending 
activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 12, 
2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-3896 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Timothy R. MUELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John M. JABE, Deputy Director of Operations, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-7405.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2010.

Timothy R. Mueller, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy R. Mueller seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions to appoint counsel, for class certification, and to amend his complaint. No final judgment has been entered in the underlying case, which remains pending in the district court.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). To the extent that Mueller seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his motions for appointment of counsel and to amend his complaint, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal in the absence of a final judgment. Further, although an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion for class certification may proceed with leave of this court, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); *see*Fed. R. App. P. 5, Mueller has not properly petitioned this court for such leave.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Mueller’s motion to this court for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.6.6    Quaker City Bank Three Year Employment Agreement Renewal and
                  Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and
                  Frederic R. McGill dated July 1, 2000.



                                QUAKER CITY BANK
                         THREE YEAR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Executive:    Frederic R. (Rick) McGill
                     -----------------------------------------------------------



The undersigned executive does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 15, 2000, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank
acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Three Year Employment Agreement
with the undersigned executive to a full thirty-six (36) month term, until June
30, 2003.


Dated this ___1st___ day of ______July___________, A.D.,____2000_______________.



                                                 QUAKER CITY BANK


/s/Frederic R. McGill                          By: /s/Jerome L. Thomas
----------------------------------------           ---------------------------
Executive                                      Chairman of the Board