alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the "
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), the
undersigned, constituting the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer of Mega Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the
best of their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the issuer for the fiscal quarter then ended.

Date: May 14, 2003                                   MEGA GROUP, INC.

                                                 By: /s/ JOHN H. BROWN
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     John H. Brown
                                                     Chief Executive Officer



Date: May 14, 2003                               By: /s/ MERRITT C. BROWN
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Merritt C. Brown
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0271

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GREGORY L. WALLACE,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

JUN 1 5 2021

Bovven Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State of Mnr,tarua

ORDER

Gregory L. Wallace petitions this Court for an out-of-time appeal. He indicates that

he improperly filed a Notice of Appeal with the District Court and that he discussed filing

a timely appeal with his attorney. He raises several issues, including "with-holding

Discovery to felonious escape in l4th, [September], yr. of 2014 . . .

This Court is familiar with Wallace and his criminal history.' In October 2014, the

State of Montana charged Wallace with felony escape after Wallace failed to return to the

Butte Pre-Release Center on September 14, 2014. The State initially brought the charge in

the Powell County District Court (Cause No. DC 14-54), and on March 17, 2015, the

criminal case was transferred to the Butte-Silver Bow County District Court (Cause No.

DC 15-58). Wallace received a two-year suspended sentence to the Department of

Corrections. The District Court ran the sentence consecutively to a prior ten-year sentence

as a persistent felony offender with two years suspended for felony driving under the

influence from the Yellowstone County District Court. Wallace now seeks to appeal this

conviction.

I Wallace v. Kirkegard, No. OP 15-0069, Order (Mont. Feb. 10, 2015); State v. Wallace,

No. DA 15-0101, Order (Mont. Feb. 25, 2015); Wallace v. Kirkegard, No. OP 16-0432, Order

(Aug. 2, 2016); Wallace v. State, No. DA 19-0129, Order (Mar. 19, 2019), and Wallace v. Guyer

& Kowalski, No. OP 20-0317, Order (Mont. Jun. 23, 2020).

06/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0271
M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant an out-of-time appeal "[i]ri the

infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross

miscarriage of justice[1"

Wallace is not entitled to an out-of-time appeal. M. R. App. P. 4(6). In 2019, this

Court denied Wallace's out-of-time appeal of the same criminal conviction and sentence

because he could not explain the several years' delay in seeking an appeal. Wallace v.

State, No. DA 19-0129, Order (Mont. Mar. 19, 2019). Wallace has not shown

extraordinary circumstances for his second attempt after another years-long delay. We

refuse "to reopen what has been decided[1" State v. Gilder, 2001 MT 121, ¶ 1 1,

305 Mont. 362, 28 P.3d 488 (citation omitted).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Wallace's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal

is DENIED and DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to

Gregory L. Wallace personally.

DATED this 13- —day ofJune, 2021.

Chief Justice

2
Exhibit 21



G&L Realty Corp.

List of Subsidiaries

March 30, 2004



|1. | G&L Hampden, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------------

|2. | G&L Hampden, LLC a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------

|3. | G&L Realty Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------

|4. | G&L Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------------

|5. | G&L Gardens, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------

|6. | G&L Senior Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | ---------------------------------------------

|7. | G&L Medical Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------

|8. | 435 N. Roxbury Drive, Ltd., a California limited partnership
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------

|9. | G&L Grabel San Pedro, LLC
|-- | -------------------------

|10. | G&L Burbank, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|11. | G&L Burbank Managers Corp., a California corporation
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------

|12. | G&L Holy Cross, LLC
|--- | -------------------

|13. | G&L Holy Cross Managers Corp., a California corporation
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------

|14. | G&L Tustin, LLC
|--- | ---------------

|15. | G&L Tustin Managers Corp., a California corporation
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------

|16. | G&L Valencia, LLC
|--- | -----------------

|17. | G&L Penasquitos, LLC
|--- | --------------------

|18. | G&L Hoquiam, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|19. | G&L Lyons, LLC
|--- | --------------

|20. | G&L Coronado (1998), LLC
|--- | ------------------------

|21. | G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, LLC
|--- | -----------------------------

|22. | G&L Parsons on Eagle Run, Inc.
|--- | ------------------------------

|23. | Lakeview Associates, LLC
|--- | ------------------------

|24. | Tustin Heritage Place, LLC
|--- | --------------------------

|25. | G&L Massachusetts, LLC
|--- | ----------------------

|26. | G&L Aspen, LLC
|--- | --------------

|27. | G&L Tustin II, LLC
|--- | ------------------

|28. | G&L Tustin III, LLC
|--- | -------------------

|29. | G&L Senior Care Partnership, L.P.
|--- | ---------------------------------

|30. | G&L St. Thomas More, Inc.
|--- | -------------------------

|31. | St. Thomas More, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------

|32. | G&L Radius Realty, LLC
|--- | ----------------------

|33. | GLR/Yorba Linda, LLC
|--- | --------------------

|34. | 405 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|35. | 415 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|36. | 416 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|37. | 435 Bedford, LLC
|--- | ----------------

|38. | G&L 436 Bedford, LLC
|--- | --------------------

|39. | G&L Sherman Oaks, LLC
|--- | ---------------------

|40. | G&L 4150 Regents, LLC
|--- | ---------------------
#### MARILYN O’DONNELL *v.*CARMEN FENEQUE ET AL.

*Patrick J. Flaherty*and *Lorinda S. Coon,*in support of the petition.

*William F. Gallagher,*in opposition.

Decided June 2, 2010

The petition by the defendant Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 167 (AC 29718), is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.


                                                    /s/ Stephen J. Boyle
                                                    -------------------------
                                             Name:  Stephen J. Boyle
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 13, 2003

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Banknorth Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Banknorth Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4423

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN J. JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-92-30)

Submitted: November 4, 2005 Decided: November 17, 2005

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Jennifer Coble, COBLE & SNOW, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney,

Keith M. Cave, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin J. Jones appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release on the basis that he committed

attempted murder and was a felon in possession of a firearm during

his term of supervised release. This court reviews a district

court’s revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion.

United States v. Copley, 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

A violation of a condition of supervised release must be proved by

a preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3)

(2000); Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 700 (2000). A

state conviction for the underlying conduct is not required, and

the district court’s finding of witness credibility in the

revocation hearing is not reviewable. See U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 7B1.1, comment. (n.1) (2002); United States v.

Saunders, 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment

revoking Jones’s supervised release. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-436]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD08-00-029]
RIN 2115-AE47


Drawbridge Operating Regulation; Mississippi River, Iowa and 
Illinois

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Temporary deviation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District, has authorized a 
deviation from the regulation governing the Burlington Railroad 
Drawbridge, Mile 403.1, Upper Mississippi River at Burlington, Iowa. 
This deviation allows the drawbridge to remain closed-to-navigation for 
60 days from 12:01 a.m., December 31, 2000, until 12:01 a.m., March 1, 
2001. The drawbridge will open on signal if at least six (6) hours 
advance notice is given.

DATES: This temporary deviation is effective from 12:01 a.m., December 
31, 2000, until 12:01 a.m., March 1, 2001.

FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Roger K. Wiebusch, Bridge 
Administrator, Commander (obr), Eighth Coast Guard District, 1222 
Spruce Street, St. Louis, MO 63103-2832, (314) 539-3900, extension 378.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Burlington Railroad Drawbridge provides 
a vertical clearance of 21.5 feet above normal pool in the closed to 
navigation position. Navigation on the waterway consists primarily of 
commercial tows and recreational watercraft. This deviation has been 
coordinated with waterway users who do not object.
    This deviation allows the bridge to remain closed-to-navigation 
from 12:01 a.m., December 31, 2000, to 12:01 a.m., March 1, 2001, with 
openings provided upon receipt of six (6) hours advance notice. Advance 
notice may be given by calling Mr. Al Poole, (309) 345-6103 during work 
hours and Mr. Larry Moll, (309) 752-5244, after hours. The drawbridge 
normally opens on signal.

    Dated: December 28, 2000
K.J. Eldridge,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Eighth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 01-436 Filed 1-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
| Date: November 14, 2011 |   | /s/ Chris T. Sharng                              |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Chris T. SharngPresident(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                         |   |                                                  |   |
|                         |   |                                                  |   |

| Date: November 14, 2011 |   | /s/ Timothy S. Davidson                                                                      |   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Timothy S. DavidsonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                              |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                              |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000829092
<NAME> MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-12-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                           5,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,620
<PP&E>                                         198,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                (58,343)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,555
<BONDS>                                        121,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,924
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,225
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,918
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,299
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# 2018 MPP - Existing 

# Sheet1

# 2018 MPP

# Premium Per Cwt. Data
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2234

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make S corporations eligible

for the rules applicable to real property subdivided for sale by

noncorporate taxpayers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1993

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

S corporations eligible for the rules applicable to real

property subdivided for sale by noncorporate taxpayers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. S CORPORATIONS ELIGIBLE FOR RULES APPLI4 CABLE TO REAL PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED FOR

5 SALE BY NONCORPORATE TAXPAYERS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1237 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to real prop8 erty subdivided for sale) is amended by striking ‘‘other
2

•HR 2234 IH

1 than a corporation’’ and inserting ‘‘other than a C cor2 poration’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply to sales after January 1, 1992

5 (and to sales and exchanges on or before such date for

6 purposes of determining whether the treatment under sec7 tion 1237(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 applies

8 to any sale after such date).

Æ
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eat at Joe’s, Ltd., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Joseph Fiore, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011








/s/ Joseph Fiore


Joseph Fiore


CEO, CFO, Chairman, Secretary, Director


(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2302 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2302

To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing suspension of 
                    duty on o-Benzyl-p-chlorophenol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1993

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend until January 1, 1995, the previously existing suspension of 
                    duty on o-Benzyl-p-chlorophenol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON O-BENZYL-P-
              CHLOROPHENOL.

    Heading 9902.29.09 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/90'' and inserting ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect 
on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1990; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been no duty or a lower duty 
if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or 
withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
withdrawal had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41204

Summary Calendar

 

AURORA DE LA PAZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-97-CV-413

- - - - - - - - - -

August 5, 1999

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Aurora De La Paz appeals from the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income. She argues that the

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in disregarding De La

Paz’s subjective complaints while assessing her residual

functional capacity, the ALJ posed inadequate hypothetical

questions to the vocational expert, and the Commissioner’s

determination regarding her disability status was not supported
No. 98-41204

-2-

by substantial evidence. Because De La Paz failed to exhaust her

administrative remedies by raising her argument regarding the

hypothetical questions before the Appeals Council in her request

for review of the ALJ’s decision, we lack jurisdiction to review

this issue. See McQueen v. Apfel, 168 F.3d 152, 155 (5th Cir.

1999); Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 1994).

We have reviewed the record and find that the ALJ’s finding

regarding De La Paz’s residual functional capacity and the

Commissioner’s determination of her disability status were

supported by substantial evidence. See Leggett v. Chater, 67

F.3d 558, 564 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.