alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| (Mark      One) |                                                                                              |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  x         |  QUARTERLY      REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF      1934 |

| o | TRANSITION REPORT      UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGEACT |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Safe      Technologies International, Inc.                             |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Exact name of small      business issuer as specified in its charter) |   |

|   | Delaware                                    |   | 22-2824492               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | (State or other      jurisdiction of   |   | (IRS    Employer         |   |
|   | incorporation or      organization)    |   | Identification      No.) |   |

|   | 1200      N Federal Highway, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33432 |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (Address of      principal executive offices)                |   |

|   |                                                                                        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | (866)      297-5070                                                                         |   |
|   | (Issuer's telephone      number)                                                            |   |
|   |  __________________________________(Former      address, if changed since last report) |   |

----

|                               | Safe      Technologies International, Inc. (Registrant) |                                |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                         |                                |   |
| Date:      November 23, 2009  | By:                                                          | /s/Christopher      L. Kolb         |   |
|                               |                                                         | Christopher      L. Kolb, President |   |
|                               |                                                         |                                |   |
|                               |                                                         |                                |   |

----
941 A.2d 1261

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Rakim MELVIN, Petitioner.

No. 140 EM 2007.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 7, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Extension of Time to File Petition for Alowance of Appeal is granted. Aan Sagot, Esquire is directed to file a petition for *215allowance of appeal within 45 days of the date of this order. The Application for Appointment of Counsel is dismissed as moot.
### NU MBE R 13- 94- 0029 0-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ W AL T ERL . B R IO N ES , Ap pe l l an t, v . C OM M ER C IA L M ETAL S C OM PA N Y , Ap pe l l ee .

_ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On A ppea l from the 9 4th D istrict C ourt of N ue ce s C ou nt y , T ex as .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and Just i ces G ar za and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am This appeal w as abated by thi s C our

t on Aug ust4, 1994, due t o the bank ru ptc y of one of t he par

ti es to thi s appeal
. See 11 U .S.C . § 362; see g ene rally T EX . R. A PP . P. 8
. Si nce the a batementthere has been no ac ti v it y i n thi s a ppeal . On M a rc h 5, 2009, the Court orde r ed th e pa rti es to fi l e an ad v i s or y reg ardi ng th e s ta tu s of th e ap pe al and , if appl ic abl e, a moti on to rein sta te t he appe al or a moti on to dismi ss the appeal . The order2

noti fied th e par

ti es th a t fail ur e to re spond to the o rd er w oul d resul t i n rein sta tement and dis mis sal of the a ppeal for w ant o f pros ecut ion
. The par ti es hav e fail ed to respon d. Ac cordin g ly , w e rein sta te an d di smi ss the appeal for w ant o f pros ecut ion
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .3(b).
PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv er ed and filed thi s t he 9t h day

of Apr il , 200 9.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         229,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,809
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           455
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,809
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,495
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,702)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         211,162
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                41,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    758,920
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,179,256
<ALLOWANCE>                                     61,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,456,244
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,385,205
<SHORT-TERM>                                   632,704
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             61,324
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     376,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,456,244
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                211,937
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               37,017
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,391
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               250,345
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              88,833
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,598
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          139,914
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 503
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                110,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,059
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      57,059
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                     32,327
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,123
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,305
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                60,975
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,134
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,612
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               61,663
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            61,663
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
June 1, 1999



Trendview Management Inc.
600 B Street - Suite 1650
San Diego, California 92101

Attention:  Mr. Clark Smith

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Dear Mr. Smith:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 2000
and.all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reached at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

TRENDVIEW MANAGEMENT INC.

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
VII

Private Calendar No. 7

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2266

[Report No. 103–578]

For the relief of Orlando Wayne Naraysingh.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1993

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JUNE 30, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Orlando Wayne Naraysingh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR ORLANDO

4 WAYNE NARAYSINGH.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Orlando Wayne Naraysingh shall

6 be classified as a child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the

7 Immigration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval

8 of a relative visa petition filed under section 204 of such
2

•HR 2266 RH

1 Act by his adoptive parent and the filing of an application

2 for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Orlando Wayne

4 Naraysingh enters the United States before the filing

5 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered

6 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other7 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under

8 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

9 the date of the enactment of this Act.

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe12 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant

13 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed

14 with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the

15 enactment of this Act.

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Orlando Wayne Naraysingh, the Secretary of

19 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for

20 the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide

21 level of family-sponsored immigrants under section

22 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

23 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

24 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

25 parents, brothers, and sisters of Orlando Wayne
3

•HR 2266 RH

1 Naraysingh shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be

2 accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi3 gration and Nationality Act.

Private Calendar No. 

7

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2266

[Report No. 103–578]

A BILL

For the relief of Orlando Wayne Naraysingh.

JUNE 30, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
**Exhibit 10.27 —****CONSULTING AGREEMENT**
**THIS AGREEMENT**is made as of the 9th day of December 2004 by and between **TRIAD GUARANTY INC**., aDelaware corporation (“TGI”), **TRIAD GUARANTY INSURANCE CORPORATION**, an Illinois corporation(“TGIC”), **TRIAD GUARANTY ASSURANCE COMPANY**, an Illinois corporation (“TGAC”) and **COLLATERALMORTGAGE, LTD.**, an Alabama Limited Partnership (“CML”). TGI, TGIC and TGAC may be referred toindividually as “Company” or collectively as “Companies”.
     **WHEREAS**, TGI, TGIC and CML entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement on or about February1, 1998; and
     **WHEREAS**, TGI, TGIC and CML have agreed to terminate said Investment Advisory Agreement andhave done so by letter dated December 9, 2004; and
     **WHEREAS**, TGI, TGIC, TGAC and CML desire to enter into this Consulting Agreement (“Agreement”)to memorialize the terms of their agreement.
     **NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties heretoagree as follows:
 1.  TGI, TGIC and TGAC have entered into an Asset Management Agreement withConning Asset Management Company (“Conning”) on or about December 9, 2004.  2.  As a result of the above referenced Asset Management Agreement, the Companiesdesire that CML become an advisor to management of the Companies and an advisor to theInvestment Committee and Board of Directors of TGI with respect to the newly formedrelationship with Conning.  3.  CML will monitor and provide advice and counsel regarding the investmentstrategy and tactics of Conning.  4.  CML will participate in the strategy that Companies and Conning desire toinitiate in their business dealings, including, but not limited to, changes inliquidity, changes in term, and strategic and tactical changes in portfolio managementduring the onset of the Companies’ and Conning’s relationship.
 

 

 5.  CML will review Conning’s actual results compared to predeterminedbenchmarks.  6.  CML will participate in monthly conference calls with Conning and Companies.  7.  Companies will pay CML a total of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) inequal quarterly installments of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000).  8.  This Agreement will be for a term of twelve (12) months beginning on or aboutJanuary 1, 2005. Upon the mutual agreement of the Parties, the term may be renewedfor an additional twelve (12) months or a shorter term.  9.  This Agreement may be terminated by any party at any time by giving thirty(30) days written notice to the other parties.  10.  This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the lawsof the State of Illinois.
     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed this Agreement effective the 9thday of December, 2004.
     **TRIAD GUARANTY INC.**
     By: /S/ Ron Kessinger
 
 
     **TRIAD GUARANTY INSURANCE CORPORATION**
     By: /S/ Ron Kessinger
     **TRIADGUARANTY ASSURANCE CORPORATION**
     By: /S/ Ron Kessinger
 
 
     **FOR COLLATERAL MORTGAGE, LTD.**
     By: /S/ Cheryl R. Stone
     Its: Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6808
LANDON FUNDERBURK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET RENO; J. M. VANYUR, Warden; MARK HENRY; ED CROSLEY, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-234-5-F) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Funderburk v. Reno, No. CA-97-234-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted December 6, 2007

Decided December 19, 2007

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

 Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

 Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 07-2495

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

EDWARD WILLIAMS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern

Division.

No. 89 CR 908

James B. Zagel, Judge.

ORDER

The appellant was convicted on drug and related charges and sentenced to

life imprisonment in 1992. The conviction and sentence were eventually affirmed by

this court in 1997 in an unpublished opinion 1997 WL 303359. He later filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 to vacate the judgment. It was dismissed as being an unauthorized second section 2255 motion after an earlier motion of his under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 was recharacterized as a section 2255 motion. In 2006 he filed a

third collateral attack, this one denominated as a request for relief under the All

Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. section 1651. The district court denied relief, and this appeal

followed. We affirm. Like the earlier Rule 33 motion, the motion under section 1651

is functionally a section 2255 motion. Nomenclature is irrelevant. A convicted defendant cannot evade the limitation on successive such motions by calling a motion

by a different name. E.g., United States v. Scott, 414 F.3d 815 (7th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond I, Inc. (the "Company") on Form10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Loflin, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), that: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: August 21, 2005. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN |   |
|-------------------------|------------------|--------|

|   | David LoflinPresident |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1854 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1854

Making appropriations for the House of Representatives Botanic Gardens 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 1993

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Making appropriations for the House of Representatives Botanic Gardens 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums 
are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, namely.

                            botanic gardens

    For all necessary expenses for maintenance, care, and operation of 
the Botanic Gardens and the nurseries, building, grounds and 
collections, $2,862,000, as authorized by law.

                                 <all>
```