alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07-0069-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JUNE 15, 2007

	______________________________

	KEVIN L. JONES, SR., 

										Appellant

	v.

	TRAVIS COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT 

	a/k/a TRAVIS COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND

	CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, 

										Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY;

	NO. D-1-GN-06-001983; HON. GISELA TRIANA, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Kevin L. Jones, Sr., an indigent inmate, appeals from orders granting a plea to the jurisdiction filed by the Travis County Adult Probation Department a/k/a Travis County Community Supervision and Corrections Department (TCAPD).  The latter was sued for monetary damages and injunctive relief due to its purported failure to inform Jones that his criminal conviction had been affirmed by the Third Court of Appeals.  This, in turn, effectively denied him the opportunity to timely initiate a petition for discretionary review, so he alleged.  TCAPD filed a plea to the jurisdiction contending that the lawsuit was barred by sovereign immunity, which plea the trial court granted.  Though his appellate contentions are somewhat confusing, we construe them as attacking the trial court’s decision.  Simply put, he believes that the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the action.  We disagree and affirm the order.1    

	Counties, as subdivisions of the state, enjoy sovereign immunity from suit.  Reed v. Prince, 194 S.W.3d 101, 103 (Tex. App.–Texarkana 2006, pet. denied).  Yet, there are two exceptions to this rule.  One involves the recompense of injury caused by an employee acting within the scope of his employment and arising from the operation or use of a motor vehicle or motor driven equipment.  Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §101.021(1) (Vernon 2005).  The other involves the recompense of injury caused by a condition or use of tangible personal or real property if the governmental unit would, as a private person, be liable to the claimant.  Id.§101.021(2).  Moreover, to pierce the shield resurrected by sovereign immunity, the plaintiff generally must allege, in his live pleading, facts illustrating a cause of action within the parameters of §101.021(1) or (2).2  City of Lubbock v. Rule, 68 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2002, no pet.), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Shumate, 199 S.W.3d 279 (Tex. 2006).  Jones has not done that.  His allegations regarding the failure to notify implicate neither a motor vehicle, motor driven equipment, realty, nor tangible personalty.  Thus, the trial court accurately concluded that he pled no cause of action which could survive the bar of sovereign immunity.

	Accordingly, the orders dismissing his suit are affirmed.

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice
# Content start

## Reports to Congress

In compliance with §105 of the TSP Enhancement Act of 2009, Public Law 111- 31, the FRTIB prepares annual reports which outline the status of the development and implementation of the mutual fund window in the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) as well as provide TSP participant statistics and investment manager diversity demographics.

FRTIB also provides to Congress summaries of education outreach efforts to TSP participants.  The FRTIB engages participants through the TSP website; emails to participants; videos, webinars, and a podcast; one-on-one communications; and customized trainings for participants, agency and service representatives, and military financial educators.

**Most Recent Annual Report:**2022 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

**Most Recent Education Efforts Report:**2023 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

### Older annual reports, descending by year

#### Previous Annual Reports 

2021 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2020 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2019 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2018 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2017 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2016 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2014 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2013 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2012 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2011 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

2010 Annual report to Congress [PDF]

### older educational efforts reports, descending by year

#### Previous Reports on Education Efforts 

2022 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2021 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2020 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2019 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2018 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2017 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2016 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2015 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2014 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2013 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]

2012 Annual Report on Education Efforts [PDF]
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 11

- 00743

- CV

The Estate of Thomas Edward FARMER , Deceased

From the Probate Court No

. 1

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007

- PC

- 0655

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 9, 2011

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they no longer

wish to prosecute this appeal. The motion asks that costs of appeal be taxed against the parties

who incurred them. The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismisse d. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. See id . 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
July 22, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BRENDALYN LANE

- JONES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00054

- CV V.

THE ESTATE OF ODEAN JONES, DECEASED , A ppellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, The Estate of Odean Jones , signed December 3, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the jud gment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Brendalyn Lane

- Jones, pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 21.1

                     Amended Subsidiaries of the Registrant


(1)     Merit Realty, Inc.
(2)     Crossmann Communities Partnership
(3)     Crossmann Communities of Ohio, Inc.
(4)     Deluxe Homes of Lafayette, Inc.
(5)     Crossmann management, Inc.
(6)     Deluxe Aviation, Inc.
(7)     Crossmann Investments, Inc.
(8)     Crossmann Mortgage Corp.
(9)     Cutter Homes, Ltd.
(10)    Crossmann Communities of Tennessee, LLC
(11)    Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc.
(12)    Pinehurst Builders, LLC
(13)    Trinity Homes, LLC
(14)    Meridian Structural Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.
(15)    Deluxe Homes of Ohio, Inc.
(16)    Builders' Link, Inc.
(17)    Crossmann-Habitat, LLC
(18)    Crossmann Realty Co.
(19)    Merit Realty of Tennessee, Inc.
(20)    Paragon Title, LLC
EXHIBIT 32


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Randi Swatt, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:


     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Randi Swatt
------------------------------------------
Randi Swatt, Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         266,396
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,729
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0
<PP&E>                                          37,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 691,775
<SHORT-TERM>                                   653,859
<PAYABLES>                                     151,541
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          145,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       185,231
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   691,775
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            15,155
<COMMISSIONS>                                1,096,835
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  302,910
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,904
<COMPENSATION>                                 871,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,874
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,874
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Patrick RIFFE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-10330

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 16, 2010.

Ramona C. Albin, Daniel J. Fortune, Joyce White Vance, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jason Carl Neff, Sims & Neff, LLC, Tuscaloosa, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Patrick Riffe appeals the 168-month total sentence he received after he pled guilty to one count of receiving child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A), one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of § 2252A(a)(5)(B), and one count of criminal forfeiture, pursuant to § 2253(a)(1), (a)(3). Riffe asserts he should not have received a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)(F) because he was not convicted of distribution of child pornography. He further contends his sentence is procedurally and substantively unreasonable because the district court’s explanation for his sentence was insufficient and the court failed to consider the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Lastly, Riffe argues the “amount of images” enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(7)(D), violates the separation of powers doctrine. After review, we affirm Riffe’s sentence.

Prior to his sentencing hearing, Riffe filed a written objection to the pre-sentence report specifically objecting to the legal conclusion that he had distributed child pornography. He did not, however, object to the facts in the PSI which showed he used Limewire, a peer-to-peer file-sharing program, to obtain and store child pornography images on his computer. Therefore, it is undisputed that Riffe obtained child pornography through the use of file-sharing software, stored such pornography in his shared folder, and the police downloaded pornography directly from that folder. We find no error in the district court’s application of the § 2G2.2(b)(3)(F) distribution enhancement.

Additionally, we conclude Riffe’s 168-month total sentence was both procedural*342ly and substantively reasonable. The district court correctly calculated the advisory guideline range and stated the range was advisory. The court made clear it had considered the § 3553(a) factors, and it emphasized the seriousness of the offense and the need for specific deterrence. The court’s sentence of 168 months represented the lowest end of the applicable guideline range of 168-210 months, and we ordinarily expect such a sentence to be reasonable. *See United States v. Talley,*431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir.2005).

Lastly, the district court did not commit plain error when it applied an “amount of images” enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(7)(D). Although this Court nor the Supreme Court has previously addressed the constitutionality of the enhancement, other circuits have upheld the statute’s constitutionality. *See, e.g., United States v. Rodgers,*610 F.3d 975, 977-78 (7th Cir.2010); *United States v. Bastian,*603 F.3d 460, 465 (8th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         399,387
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               189,909
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,881,830
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      6,426,231
<ALLOWANCE>                                     88,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,882,729
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,832,172
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,046,135
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            103,768
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          100,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                     749,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               9,887,729
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                453,583
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               81,723
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               535,306
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             181,343
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,985
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          273,978
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,702
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,506
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                242,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 99,320
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      99,320
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,996
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                     55,151
<LOANS-PAST>                                     7,526
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   270
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                88,075
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,937
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,812
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               88,671
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            88,671
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES; STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000829114
<NAME> THE PRUDENTIAL VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      27,061,204
<SECURITIES>                                 3,032,357
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           217,516,644
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             217,516,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,424,397
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 213,092,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               217,516,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,974,956
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,669,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,931,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,931,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,931,850
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
943 A.2d 241

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Justin C. BINNEY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 18, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2008, the order of the Erie County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared Section 3802 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802, unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. This Court upheld the constitutionality of Sections 3802(a)(2) and 3802(c) in *Commonwealth v. Duda,*592 Pa. 164, 923 A.2d 1138 (2007), and *Commonwealth v. Finchio,*592 Pa. 577, 926 A.2d 968 (2007), respectively. Although Appellee was *317charged under Section 3802(b), this Court explained in *Finchio*that “[t]he difference in the statutory BAC threshold is immaterial to the analysis employed in *Duda.” Finchio,*592 Pa. at 581, 926 A.2d at 971. The Commonwealth’s application for relief is dismissed as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10QSB - CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS (LOSS) FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 10,041
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         102,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      166,226
<PP&E>                                                209,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,005,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 525,720
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                               33,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                            479,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,005,249
<SALES>                                               201,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      201,919
<CGS>                                                  11,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          11,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      241,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (51,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (51,551)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (51,551)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,539,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,356,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,550,882
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            61,816,257
<PP&E>                                      11,249,733
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,331,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             186,855,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,417,635
<BONDS>                                    124,969,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,984,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               186,855,733
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,282,914
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,588,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,315,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               370,992
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,795,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (788,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (86,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (702,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (702,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0
        

</TABLE>