alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10897-10898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4088]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 13, 2001.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: One Washington Circle Hotel, Presidential Board Room, One 
Washington Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Lillian M. Publos, Ph.D, Chief, Scientific 
Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Nueroscience Center, 6001 Executive 
Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e120e4c461b3e10171650191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7cbd7959fc2e7c9cecf89c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neuroscience, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


[[Page 10898]]


    Dated: February 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-4088 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 20, 2010

d1013 

# Order

October 20, 2010

140840

KATHY KAY NEVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140840 COA: 294461 Wayne CC: 94-402973-DM MARK T. NEVILLE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 16, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave gran ted, of whether the trial c ourt correctly held that the parties’ November 14, 1994 divorce judgment limited the plaintiff’s survivorship benefit to a proportionate interest based on years of marriage, that the divorce judgment conflicted with the 1995 Qua lified Domestic Relations Or der (QDRO) agreed upon by the parties, that the terms of the divorce judgment should control over the terms of the QDRO, and that the defend ant’s motion to have the QDRO amended was not timebarred.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1832(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 16, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. Centennial First Financial Services, Inc., Redlands, California; 
to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Palomar Community Bank, 
Escondido, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 13, 
2001.
Robert DeV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-4038 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RENE RUIZ

- MAYO,

Petitioner

v.

MARK GARMAN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 95 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael BANCHS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-11010

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 7, 2014.

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Banchs appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. *See*18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Relying on *National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius,*— U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2566, 183 L.Ed.2d 450 (2012) *(National*Federation), he contends that § 922(g)(1) exceeds Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause. He argues *246that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied because his factual resume did not state that his possession of the firearm was an economic activity and failed to reflect that he was engaged in the relevant market at the time of the regulated conduct. Further, he contends that § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional because *National Federation*interpreted the Commerce Clause to mandate that “Congress may regulate only ongoing economic activity,” and his possession of a firearm purchased many years ago does not qualify. However, he concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by our decision in *United States v. Alcantar,*733 F.3d 143, 145 (5th Cir.2013), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1570, 188 L.Ed.2d 579 (2014). The Government moves for summary affirmance, or in the alternative, for an extension of time to file an appellee’s brief.

Whether our review is de novo or for plain error, Banchs’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is foreclosed. *See Alcantar,*733 F.3d at 146 & n. 4. Therefore, we GRANT the Government’s motion for summary affirmance, DENY its alternative motion for an extension of time to file an appellee’s brief, and AFFIRM Banchs’s conviction.

*

 Pursuant to 5TH Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH Cir. R. 47.5.4.?
#### FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marian HUNTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-15475

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 13, 2014.

Frederick G. Boynton, Morris Hardwick Schneider, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*882Michael Bernard King, Office of Michael B. King, Jonesboro, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WILSON, ANDERSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Marian Hunter (the Defendant) appeals, presenting two issues. She contends: (1) that the district court erred in remanding this diversity case to the De-Kalb County Superior Court based upon defects in the removal procedure; and (2) that the district court abused its discretion in awarding attorneys’ fees ($2,240.00) to First Citizens Bank & Trust Company (the Plaintiff).

As to the first issue, a three judge panel of this court has entered an order dismissing this appeal of the remand order because this court lacks jurisdiction to review the order. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (“An order remanding a case to the State Court from which it was removed is not renewable on appeal.”). While this panel has the right to alter, amend or vacate this order under 11th Cir. R. 27-l(g), we decline to do so.

As to the second issue, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in the fee award pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) because the court did not err in the conclusion that the removal was objectively unreasonable.

The appeal of the remand order stands DISMISSED for lack of our jurisdiction to review it. The award of attorneys’ fees is AFFIRMED.
/**
 * @file
 * Attaches behaviors for the zipang captcha refresh module.
 */

(function ($) {
    'use strict';
  
    /**
     * Attaches jQuery validate behavoir to forms.
     *
     * @type {Drupal~behavior}
     *
     * @prop {Drupal~behaviorAttach} attach
     *  Attaches the outline behavior to the right context.
     */
    Drupal.behaviors.CaptchaRefresh = {
  
      attach: function (context) {
        $('.reload-captcha', context).not('.processed').bind('click', function () {
          $(this).addClass('processed');
          var $form = $(this).parents('form');
          // Send post query for getting new captcha data.
          var date = new Date();
          //var baseUrl = document.location.origin;
          //var url = baseUrl + '/' + $(this).attr('href') + '?' + date.getTime();
          //Commented the previous 2 lines and added this line to fix the issue withe get new captcha link
          var url = $(this).attr('href') + '?' + date.getTime();
          // Adding loader.
          $('.captcha').append('<div class="image_captcha_refresh_loader"></div>');
          $.get(
            url,
            {},
            function (response) {
              if (response.status === 1) {
                $('.captcha', $form).find('img').attr('src', response.data.url);
                $('input[name=captcha_sid]', $form).val(response.data.sid);
                $('input[name=captcha_token]', $form).val(response.data.token);
                $('.captcha .image_captcha_refresh_loader').remove();
              }
              else {
                alert(response.message);
              }
            },
            'json'
          );
          return false;
        });
      }
    };
  })(jQuery);
EXHIBIT 10.1

                             COMPENSATION AGREEMENT

This  Compensation  Agreement  is  dated  as of July  25,  2006  among  Knockout
Holdings,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  and Gregory Sichenzia
("Consultant").

      WHEREAS,  the Company has requested the  Consultant to provide the Company
with legal services in connection  with their  business,  and the Consultant has
agreed to provide the Company with such legal services; and

      WHEREAS,  the Company wishes to compensate  the Consultant  with shares of
its common stock for such services rendered;

      NOW  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  mutual  covenants  hereinafter
stated, it is agreed as follows:

1. The Company will issue up to 999,999  shares of the  Company's  common stock,
par value  $.001 per  share,  to the  Consultant  subsequent  to the filing of a
registration  statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
registering  such  shares,  as set forth in  Section 2 below.  The  shares to be
issued shall represent  consideration  for legal services to be performed by the
Consultant on behalf of the Company.

2. The above  compensation  shall be  registered  using a Form S-8.  The Company
shall file such Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  within 30
days of the execution of this agreement.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  this Compensation  Agreement has been executed by the
Parties as of the date first above written.

                                            KNOCKOUT HOLDINGS, INC.

                                            /s/ JOHN BELLAMY
                                            -----------------------
                                            John Bellamy
                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                            GREGORY SICHENZIA

                                            /s/ GREGORY SICHENZIA
                                            -----------------------
                                            Gregory Sichenzia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF NET ASSETS; STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000829114
<NAME> PRUCO LIFE OF NEW JERSEY VARIABLE CONTRACT REAL PROPERTY ACC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,106,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,106,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,106,724
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,108
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                144,562
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            144,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   144,562
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 9901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, March 2, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Friday, March 2, 2001 6 p.m. to 9:20 p.m. at the Internal Revenue 
Service Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 
11201. For more information or to confirm attendance, notification of 
intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain 
can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555. The public is invited 
to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9:20 p.m. on Friday, March 2, 
2001.
    Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like 
to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, 
Brooklyn, NY, 11201. The Agenda will include the following: Various IRS 
issues.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: January 26, 2001.

Jack Mannion,
Director, Program Planning and Quality.
[FR Doc. 01-3542 Filed 2-9-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 2, 2016

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

ANNOUNCES A RELAXATION OF HARDSHIP WITHDRAWAL 

RULES TO HELP VICTIMS OF LOUISIANA FLOODING 

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) announced today 

that it has made a temporary change to the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) hardship withdrawal rules 

to help victims of the recent storms in Louisiana pursuant to the guidance issued by the Internal 

Revenue Service on August 30. 

Beginning today, the TSP will treat any Financial Hardship In-Service Withdrawal Request

(Form TSP-76) received until January 10, 2017 as qualifying for a hardship withdrawal if the 

participant writes “Louisiana Storms” at the top of the form and checks the block on the form for 

personal casualty on page 2, Item 18 of the form. The distributions must occur before January 17, 

2017 to qualify for this treatment. 

The participant should write “Louisiana Storms” at the top of the form and check the “personal 

casualty” box on the TSP-76. The TSP will then waive the rule that prohibits a participant from 

making employee contributions for 6 months after taking a hardship withdrawal. This will allow 

an employee to continue to make contributions to the TSP and receive the employer match (if 

eligible). This temporary change will not be effective retroactively. For more information, please 

go to https://www.tsp.gov/whatsnew/plan/planNews.shtml.

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for federal employees; it 

is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private 

employers. As of July 2016, TSP assets totaled approximately 

$481 billion, and retirement savings accounts were being 

maintained for over 4.9 million TSP participants. Participants 

include federal civilian employees in all branches of 

government, employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of 

the uniformed services. Additional information can be found at 

www.tsp.gov. 
2

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver or David Toro 

202-942-1641 or 202-942-1642

(end)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 25, 2000, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-25-2000
<CASH>                                           7,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,989
<INVENTORY>                                    105,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,463
<PP&E>                                         588,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                 346,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 438,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,128
<BONDS>                                        185,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   438,708
<SALES>                                        826,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               826,580
<CGS>                                          667,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  748,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,036
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   856
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,580
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,003
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.57


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1866

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to make

permanent certain provisions relating to verification of wages and issuance of duty refund certificates to insular producers in the United States

Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 27, 1993

Mr. DE LUGO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to make permanent certain provisions relating

to verification of wages and issuance of duty refund

certificates to insular producers in the United States

Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF VERIFICATION AND CERTIFI4 CATE ISSUANCE PROVISIONS.

5 Additional U.S. Note 5(h)(i) to Chapter 91 of the

6 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by striking ‘‘and before January 1, 1995,’’.
2

•HR 1866 IH

Æ