alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,500
<SECURITIES>                                    13,461
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (590)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,720<F1>
<PP&E>                                          38,251<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,701)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,136
<BONDS>                                          2,020<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,083
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,344)<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,895
<SALES>                                         30,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,505<F6>
<CGS>                                           20,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,285<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    387
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS ON UNCOMPLETED
CONTRACTS OF $7,028 AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS OF $1,630.
<F2>INCLUDES PORTABLE SIMULATION THEATERS OF $12,262 AND FILM INVENTORY OF $15,644.
<F3>INCLUDES PORTABLE SIMULATION THEATERS OF $4,183 AND FILM INVENTORY OF $12,475.
<F4>INCLUDES THE NON-CURRENT PORTIONS OF CAPITAL LEASES.
<F5>ACCUMULATED DEFICIT.
<F6>INCLUDES INTEREST INCOME OF $845.
<F7>CONSISTS OF SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES OF $9,870 AND RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT OF $415.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
942 A.2d 894

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Michael FITHIAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 14, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

> Whether the Superior Court misapplied the unambiguous language of the 2002 amendment to the compulsory joinder rule, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110, that limited the rule by requiring joinder of only crimes that “occurred within the same judicial district” as a former prosecution, an amendment that this Court has not yet authoritatively interpreted?

Petitioner’s Application to File Amended Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
#### Norman Nabir SHELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. ROHRS, Correctional Officer, USP Coleman II, Lt. McCullough, Correctional Lt., USP Coleman II, Lt. Nobles, S.I.S. LT., USP Coleman II, L. Williams, Deputy Captain, USP Coleman II, D. Drew, Warden, USP Coleman II, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-10577

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 15, 2010.

Norman Nabir Shelton, Lewisburg, PA, pro se.

Lewisburg USP Warden, Lewisburg, PA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

A. Brian Albritton, David Paul Rhodes, Michelle Thresher Taylor, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HULL, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*Pro se*appellant Norman Nabir Shelton, a federal prisoner, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights action against the warden and several corrections officers. Shelton checked “no” to the question on the complaint form asking whether he had filed any other actions in state or federal court. But according to the district court’s case management system, Shelton had filed at least four prior civil actions in federal court. After the court ordered Shelton to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed, Shelton explained that he did not remember filing any civil suits and his records were unavailable to him while incarcerated.

The district court rejected Shelton’s explanation and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)® for abuse of judicial process.

In his notice of appeal, Shelton argued the dismissal was improper because he did not intend to mislead the court and he simply was unaware of the law. In his appellate brief, however, Shelton argues the merits of his substantive case against the defendants and does not address the dismissal for abuse of the judicial process.

Because we construe *pro se*pleadings liberally, *Tannenbaum v. United States,*148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir.1998), we will consider the notice of appeal as the relevant argument.

Section 1915(e)(2)(B)® provides that the district court may dismiss the case of a prisoner proceeding *in forma pauperis*at any time if the action is frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We review a district court’s frivolity dismissal under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for abuse of discretion.1*Mitchell v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.,*294 F.3d 1309, 1315 (11th Cir.2002) (citation omitted).

*341We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. The court’s ease management system showed that Shelton had filed at least four previous civil actions. Even if Shelton did not have access to his materials, he would have known that he filed multiple previous lawsuits. Moreover, the court dismissed without prejudice; Shelton may refile his complaint with a correct response to the questions asked.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Prior to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, dismissals for maliciousness under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)'s predecessor, § 1915(d), were reviewed for abuse of discretion. *Bilal v. Driver,*251 F.3d 1346, 1348-49 (11th Cir. 2001).
Order entered October 29, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-00970-CV

CTMI, LLC, MARK BOOZER AND JERROD RAYMOND, Appellants

V.

RAY FISCHER AND CORPORATE TAX MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-08088-K

ORDER

Appellees Ray Fischer and Corporate Tax Management, Inc.’s motion to supplement 

clerk’s record with full clerk’s record from Case No. 05-11-01221-CV is DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Benjamin Don Eddington , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00065

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 402nd District Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 23,747

- 2018 ). Memora ndum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note t hat the appellant, Benjamin Don Eddington , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
#### CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. v. SUDDERTH et al.

No. 25536.

Feb. 5, 1935.

PHELPS, J.

This is an original action to review the award of the State Industrial Commission. The claimant received his injury at the same time and in the same manner as the claimant, Jack Goodnature, received his injuries as outlined in cause No. 25535, entitled Continental Casualty Company v. Jack Goodnature et al., opinion in which was promulgated on the 5th day of February, 1935 (170 Okla. 477, 41 P. (2d) 77).

The facts in this case are identical with the facts in that case, and the rules of law therein announced are applicable here. The award of the Industrial Commission is, therefore, affirmed.

McNEILL, C. J:, and RILEY, BUSBY, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zila, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas D. Burkett, Chief
Executive Officer of Zila, Inc., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Douglas D. Burkett, Ph.D.  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Zila, Inc. and
will be retained by Zila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. 35
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1689 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1689

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
     coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel MOONSHINE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 1993

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
     coastwise trade of the United States for the vessel MOONSHINE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) and 
section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade of the 
United States for the vessel MOONSHINE (official number 974226).

                                 <all>
```
#### Lalani Madatali MALIK, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60425

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 14, 2007.

Frank Guerra, Sugar Land, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Linda Susan Wendtland, Robert N. Markle, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Kenneth L. Pasquarell, Acting District Director, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service District Directoi’s Office, San Antonio, TX, Trey Lund, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lalani Madatali Malik, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the April 13, 2006, order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reopen his removal proceeding. The BIA denied the motion because Malik’s 60-day period for voluntary departure expired prior to the time that Malik filed his motion for reconsideration. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d).

Malik raises several issues that are not pertinent to the April 13, 2006 decision, including claims regarding his application for withholding of removal and his contention that he is entitled to relief as a derivative beneficiary of his wife’s labor-certification application. Because we have jurisdiction to review only those administrative decisions *from*which the alien has filed a petition for review, any claim not relevant to the April 13, 2006 BIA decision is not properly before us. *See Zhang v. INS,*348 F.3d 289, 292 (1st Cir. 2003) (citing *Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 405-06, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995)).

Malik concedes that, in *Banda-Ortiz v. Gonzales,*445 F.3d 387, 389-91 (5th Cir. 2006), *petition for cert. filed,*75 U.S.L.W. 3207 (Sept. 28, 2006) (No. 06-477), this court held that the BIA is not required to automatically toll the voluntary-departure period for an alien whose motion to reopen is pending before the BIA. Contrary to Malik’s suggestion, a panel of this court may not overrule precedent set by another panel, absent an intervening en banc decision of this court or a Supreme Court decision. *See Foster v. Quarterman,*466 F.3d 359, 367-68 (5th Cir.2006), *petition for cert. filed,*(Jan. 24, 2007) (No. 06-9253). Malik has not established that the BIA abused its discretion by concluding that the expiration of his voluntary-departure period precluded the gx'anting of his *422motion for reconsideration. *See Singh v. Gonzales,*436 F.3d 484, 487 (5th Cir.2006).

Malik’s petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[No. 35098-0-II.

Division Two.

September 18, 2007.]

#### Timothy R. Krienke et al., *Appellants,*v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 05-2-10102-0, Katherine M. Stolz, J., entered June 9, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridge-water, J., concurred in by Hunt and Quinn-Brintnall, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, I, Andrew J. Mako,  President of Pruco Life
Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby certify that the accompanying  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2003,  containing  the
financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property
Account (a separate  account of Pruco Life Insurance  Company of New Jersey) and
The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the "Report"), fully
complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable  Contract Real Property  Account
and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.


Date: November 14, 2003


/s/ Andrew J. Mako
--------------------
Name: Andrew J. Mako
Title: President




The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 217 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 217

  To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension of duty on 
   (6R,7R)-7-[(R)-2-Amino-2-phenylacetamido]-3-methyl-8-oxo-5-thia-1-
        azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid disolvate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension of duty on 
   (6R,7R)-7-[(R)-2-Amino-2-phenylacetamido]-3-methyl-8-oxo-5-thia-1-
        azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid disolvate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON (6R,7R)-7-[(R)-
              2-AMINO-2-PHENYLACETAMIDO]-3-METHYL-8-OXO-5-THIA-1-
              AZABICYCLO[4.2.0]OCT-2-ENE-2-CARBOXYLIC ACID DISOLVATE.

    Heading 9902.30.01 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/95''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to articles 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4144]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 3569]


Office of Mexican Affairs; Notice of Receipt of Application for a 
Presidential Permit for a Conveyor Belt To Be Constructed and 
Maintained on the Borders of the United States

AGENCY: Department of State.
    Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has received an 
application from Austin Industries L.L.C. of San Bernardino, 
California, for a Presidential Permit, pursuant to Executive Order 
11423 of August 16, 1968, as amended by Executive Order 12847 of May 
17, 1993, seeking authorization to construct a conveyor belt at a site 
east of the Otay Mesa/Mesa de Otay Port of Entry linking California and 
Baja California. The proposed conveyor belt would carry sand and gravel 
for use in construction projects in California. The conveyor belt would 
be approximately 275 feet long and four feet wide, supported by fixed 
``I'' beams approximately 15 feet apart. When not in use, it would be 
stowed and locked entirely on the U.S. side of the border.
    As required by E.O. 11423, the Department of State is circulating 
this application to concerned agencies for comment.
    Interested parties may submit comments regarding this application 
in writing by March 22, 2001 to Mr. David E. Randolph, Coordinator, 
U.S.-Mexico Border Affairs, Office of Mexican Affairs, WHA/MEX Room 
4258, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. The application and 
related documents made part of the record to be considered by the 
Department of State in connection with this application are available 
for inspection in the Office of Mexican Affairs during normal business 
hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David E. Randolph, Coordinator, U.S.-
Mexico Border Affairs at the above address, by telephone at (202) 647-
8529 or by fax at (202) 647-5752.

    Dated: February 5, 2001.
David E. Randolph,
Coordinator, U.S.-Mexico Border Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-4144 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS II, L.P. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         169,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   633
<PP&E>                                       2,287,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,458,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,439,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,458,434
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,655
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.85)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1  STEINWAY
MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE REGISTRANT  Steinway Musical
Instruments, Inc., a Delaware corporation  Steinway & Sons
Far East, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation  ArkivMusic, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability corporation  Conn-Selmer, Inc., a
Delaware corporation  Noblet, LLC, a Wisconsin
limited liability corporation  Normandie, LLC, a
Wisconsin limited liability corporation  G. Leblanc SNC, a
partnership organized under the laws of France  Vincent Bach
International, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the United
Kingdom  Steinway & Sons,
a New York corporation  Steinway
Piano (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of China  Steinway, Inc., a
Delaware corporation  The O.S. Kelly Company,
an Ohio corporation  Boston Piano GmbH, a
corporation organized under the laws of Germany  Kluge Klaviaturen GmbH, a
corporation organized under the laws of Germany  Kluge Klawiatury,
Sp.z.o.o. Wilkow, Poland,
a limited liability company organized under the laws of Poland  Steinway Haus Munchen
GmbH, a corporation organized under the laws of Germany  Steinway & Sons
Japan, Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Japan