alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries of Navarre Corporation
 Encore Software, Inc.
    
    Minnesota corporationNavarre CS, LLC
    
    Minnesota limited liability companyNavarre CP, LLC
    
    Minnesota limited liability companyNavarre CLP, LLC
    
    Minnesota limited liability companyFUNimation Productions, Ltd.
    
    Texas limited partnershipanimeOnline, Ltd.
    
    Texas limited partnershipNavarre Distribution Services, Inc.
    
    Minnesota corporationNavarre Logistical Services, Inc.
    
    Minnesota corporationNavarre Online Fulfillment Services, Inc.
    
    Minnesota corporationNavarre Digital Services, Inc.
    
    Minnesota corporationFUNimation Channel, Inc.
    
    Minnesota corporationNavarre Distribution Services ULC
    
    British Columbia unlimited liability company
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of EyeCash Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Dated: September 22, 2004                 /s/  Chris Jensen
                                          -------------------------------------
                                               Chris Jensen
                                          Consultant performing certain
                                          services for the Company commonly
                                          performed by a Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, a consultant performing certain services for EyeCash
Networks, Inc. commonly performed by a chief financial officer, hereby
certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of EyeCash Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  September 22, 2004                /s/  Gilbert Serrano
                                          -------------------------------------
                                               Gilbert Serrano
                                          Consultant performing certain services
                                          for the Company commonly performed by
                                          a Chief Financial Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 14, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-11142 

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00817-CB-M

ANGELA F. AMOS, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

MOBILE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Alabama

 ________________________

(March 14, 2012)

Before BARKETT, HULL, Circuit Judges, and HINKLE, District Judge. *

Honorable Robert L. Hinkle, United States District Judge for the Northern District of *

Florida, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:

Angela Amos, an African-American female, was the full-time Director of

Pharmacy at the Mobile County Health Department ("MCHD") prior to her

termination. A white male was hired to replace her on a part-time basis. Amos

alleges that she was discriminated against based on race and sex and unlawfully

retaliated against for complaining about the allegedly discriminatory treatment

when she was placed on administrative leave and eventually terminated. She

alleges that, during her fifteen-month tenure as Pharmacy Director, her immediate

supervisor, Clinical Director Susan Stiegler, treated her differently than she treated

the previous Pharmacy Director Philip Brown (a white male) in three respects: (1)

Amos was required to schedule and document "sick time"; (2) Brown was

assigned to interview prospective Pharmacy Technicians while Amos was not; and

(3) Stiegler "yelled" and "spoke" to Amos very harshly while not treating Brown

the same way.

Initially, as to her discrimination claims, we affirm the district court's

conclusion that Amos has not established that she suffered from any adverse

employment actions and that Amos has not produced sufficient evidence from

which a jury could conclude that MCHD discriminated against her on the basis of

race and sex.

2
As to her retaliation claims, Amos alleges that she was wrongfully placed on

leave immediately upon complaining about discrimination against her. Having

reviewed this record, we find no reversible error. Assuming that Amos established

a prima facie case, the district court did not err in concluding that MCHD stated

legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its action and that Amos failed to show

that these reasons were pretextual.

AFFIRMED.

3
2023 ਦੀਆਂ ਸ਼ਹਿਰੀ ਕਾਊਂਟੀ ਕਮੇਟੀ 

ਚੋਣਾਂ

15 ਜੂਨ, 2023

ਨਾਮਜ਼ਦਗੀ 

ਦੀ ਮਿਆਦ ਦੀ 

ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤ। fsa.

usda.gov/

elections ਤੇ 

ਫਾਰਮ ਉਪਲਬਧ 

ਹਨ।

1 ਜੂਨ, 2023 

ਨੂੰ ਵੋਟ ਕਰੋ

ਇੱਕ ਯੋਗ ਵੋਟਰ 

ਬਣਨ ਲਈ 

ਰਜਿਸਟਰ ਕਰੋ।

ਕਿਸੇ ਵੀ ਸਮੇਂ

ਭਾਗ ਕਿਵੇਂ 

ਲੈਣਾ ਹੈ, ਇਸ 

ਬਾਰੇ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ 

ਵਾਸਤੇ ਆਪਣੇ 

ਸਥਾਨਕ FSA 

ਦਫਤਰ ਨਾਲ 

ਸੰਪਰਕ ਕਰੋ।

1 ਅਗਸਤ, 

2023

ਸਥਾਨਕ FSA 

ਕਾਉਂਟੀ ਦਫਤਰ 

ਵਿਖੇ ਨਾਮਜ਼ਦਗੀ 

ਫਾਰਮ ਭਰਨ ਦਾ 

ਆਖਰੀ ਦਿਨ।

6 ਨਵੰਬਰ, 

2023

ਬੈਲਟ ਯੋਗ 

ਵੋਟਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਡਾਕ 

ਰਾਹੀਂ ਭੇਜੇ ਜਾਂਦੇ 

ਹਨ।

4 ਦਸੰਬਰ, 

2023

ਸਥਾਨਕ FSA 

ਕਾਉਂਟੀ ਦਫਤਰ ਨੂੰ 

ਵੋਟ ਕੀਤੇ ਬੈਲਟ 

ਵਾਪਸ ਕਰਨ ਦਾ 

ਆਖਰੀ ਦਿਨ।

1 ਜਨਵਰੀ, 

2024

ਨਵੇਂ ਚੁਣੇ ਗਏ 

ਕਾਉਂਟੀ ਕਮੇਟੀ 

ਮੈਂਬਰ ਅਹੁਦਾ 

ਸੰਭਾਲਣਗੇ।

ਖੇਤੀ ਸੇਵਾ ਏਜੰਸੀ

U.S. ਖੇਤੀਬਾੜੀ ਵਿਭਾਗ

ਕੜੀ ਬਣੋ

ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਖੇਤੀਬਾੜੀ ਭਾਈਚਾਰੇ ਅਤੇ USDA ਵਿਚਕਾਰ

ਜੂਨ 2023 USDA ਇੱਕ ਬਰਾਬਰ ਮੌਕੇ ਵਾਲਾ ਪ੍ਰਦਾਨਕ, ਰੁਜ਼ਗਾਰਦਾਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਰਿਣਦਾਤਾ ਹੈ
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7107** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v.
OLUFEMI ABIODUN OGUNYEMI , Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Mi ddle District of North Carolina , at Durham

. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 1:05

- cr - 00127

- JAB

- 1 )

Submitted : September 9, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per cur iam opinion

.
Olufemi Abiodun Ogunyemi, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Olufemi Abiodu n Ogunyemi appeals the district court ’ s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ogunyemi , No. 1:05

- cr - 00127

- JAB

- 1 (M.D.N.C. July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci sional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED WITHIN THE COMPANY'S 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,516
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      8,451
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,041
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,298
<LOANS>                                        212,469
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,643
<DEPOSITS>                                     208,806
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,988
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,122
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 247,643
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,075
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  909
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   151
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,135
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,152
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,041
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,094
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,979
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,979
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.20
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,444
<LOANS-PAST>                                        76
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,211
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,114
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      494
<RECOVERIES>                                        65
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,085
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,085
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,361
<INVENTORY>                                     76,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,470
<PP&E>                                         481,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 625,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,031
<BONDS>                                        283,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           188
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   625,815
<SALES>                                        163,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,716
<CGS>                                          144,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*July 8, 2014*

[Cite as *07/08/2014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3011.]

DISCIPLINARY CASES

2014-0136.

#### Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Johnson.

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a certification of default by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Upon consideration of relator’s motion to remand to the board for default proceedings, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. This matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings under Gov.Bar R. V(6a)(F).

The court further orders that the interim default-judgment suspension imposed against respondent on March 4, 2014, shall remain in place while this matter is pending before the board. Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                          PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joey A. Jacobs, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
and I, Jack E. Polson, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

Date: August 9, 2005

                               /s/ Joey A. Jacobs
                          ----------------------------
                                 Joey A. Jacobs
                Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

                               /s/ Jack E. Polson
                          ----------------------------
                                 Jack E. Polson
                            Chief Accounting Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6335

SIDDHANTH SHARMA , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.; STEPHEN JACOBS, Warden , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolin a , at Raleigh

. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. ( 5:21

- hc

- 02065

- M )

Submitted : August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Siddhanth Sharma , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6335 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Siddhanth Sharma seeks to app eal the district court’s order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not i ssue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sharma has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before t his court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6335 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### Michael DEARING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank X. CHAVEZ, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-16983.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 2010.

Filed Jan. 6, 2011.

Michael Dearing, Jamestown, CA, pro se.

Lloyd George Carter, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Offiee of the California Attorney General, Fresno, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant Michael Dearing (“Dearing”) appeals the denial of his petition for a writ *24of habeas corpus stemming from his no contest plea to various counts of sexual abuse of a child in California state court. Dearing received a certificate of appealability on the question of whether his no contest plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily, when the trial court failed to advise him of the maximum punishment that could be imposed. Dearing also raises the uncertified issue of whether his no contest plea was invalid because he was not mentally competent to enter his plea. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Finding no reversible error on the certified question, we affirm. We conclude that reasonable jurists would not find Dealing's uncertified claim to be debatable and therefore decline to expand the certificate of appealability as to that claim.

It is undisputed that the state trial court failed to advise Dearing of his maximum possible sentence before accepting his no contest plea. The only sentence discussed on the record during the plea colloquy was an indeterminate 15-years-to-life sentence for one count. At sentencing, however, Dearing received a determinate 82-year sentence for several other counts in addition to the indeterminate sentence. Dearing maintains that the trial court’s omission amounted to a constitutional error. We disagree. Although a trial court has a constitutional obligation to obtain an affirmative waiver of the right against compulsory self-incrimination, the right to trial by jury, and the right to confront one’s accusers, *see Boykin v. Alabama,*395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), no Supreme Court case mandates that the trial court itself must notify a defendant of his maximum possible sentence before accepting a plea. The state court therefore did not err in applying California state precedent, which requires that a plea be set aside under these circumstances only where prejudice is demonstrated. Dearing failed to establish prejudice here because he pleaded no contest for the express purpose of sparing the victim from testifying at trial. Additionally, the record strongly supports the conclusion that Dearing had personal knowledge of the sentencing consequences. His trial counsel “recall[ed] specifically discussing the sentence ranges on the[ ] particular charges with Mr. Dearing.”

The court’s determination was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided *24by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E Declusin, President and CEO of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc., and I, L. Ray Adams, Vice President of Finance and CFO of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m   or 78c(d)); and                 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.

|/s/ James E. Declusin        | 
|---------------------------- | 
|                             | 
|James E. Declusin            | 
|President and CEO            | 
|                             | 
|October 28, 2005             | 
|                             | 
|/s/ L. Ray Adams             | 
|                             | 
|L. Ray Adams                 | 
|Vice President  Finance and | 
|Chief Financial Officer      | 
|                             | 
|October 28, 2005             |
# Grains and Oilseeds

# Peanuts, Pulse Crops, and Rice

# Hay and Legume Crops

# Biomass and Residues

# Fruits and Vegetables

#  Honey and Maple Sap  

# Hay Storage Structures

# Cold Storage Structures 

# Honey and Maple Sap Storages

#  Commodity Weights and Measures

# Common FAV Weights and Factors 

# Weights, Measures, &Conversions

#  Domestic Weights & Equivalents

# DATA Source

# Sheet1