alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1859 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1859

 To provide for the immediate termination of the Superconducting Super 
                           Collider project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 1993

 Mr. Inglis of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the immediate termination of the Superconducting Super 
                           Collider project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Superconducting Super Collider 
Immediate Termination Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    No Federal funds may be used, appropriated, reprogrammed, or 
obligated for the Superconducting Super Collider project, except funds 
necessary to terminate this project.

                                 <all>
```
#### Marquis Juan JOHNSON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stuart J. RYAN, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 08-55516.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 7, 2011.

Marquis Juan Johnson, Norco, CA, pro se.

Ronald Alan Jakob, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Marquis Juan Johnson appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

*72Johnson contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdicts convicting him of robbery and false imprisonment. The California court’s conclusion that there was sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable trier of fact to find Johnson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law, and was not an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *see also Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

Johnson also contends that he was denied due process when the jury was provided with an instruction which permitted reliance on an uncharged conspiracy as a basis for the robbery and false imprisonment charges. However, the record supports that Johnson had adequate notice of the uncharged conspiracy theory to defend against it. Therefore, the California court’s conclusion that Johnson’s due process rights were not violated was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *see also Cole v. Arkansas,*333 U.S. 196, 201, 68 S.Ct. 514, 92 L.Ed. 644 (1948); *Stephens v. Borg,*59 F.3d 932, 935-36 (9th Cir.1995).

We grant Johnson’s motion for judicial notice.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Christopher L.      Kolb                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher L. Kolb,      President and principal financial officer |   |
| November 13,      2009                                              |   |

----
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Security Capital Corporation:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-79468) on Form S-8 of Security Capital Corporation of our report dated
July 15, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of Security  Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1997,
which report appears in the June 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of
Security Capital Corporation



                                                           KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP




Milwaukee, Wisconsin
September 25, 1997



                                      93
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             SOLA INTERNATIONAL INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    YEAR ENDED
                                                                                    ----------
Fixed Charges:                                                          2002           2003           2004
--------------                                                          ----           ----           ----
<S>                                                                   <C>            <C>            <C>
   Interest expense ...............................................   $ 28,332       $ 30,454       $ 28,001
   Interest capitalized during period .............................        150            318          1,179
   Amortization of financing costs ................................      2,543          3,086          2,759
   Interest portion of rental expense .............................      2,280          2,896          3,702
                                                                      --------       --------       --------
        Total fixed charges .......................................   $ 33,305       $ 36,754       $ 35,641
                                                                      ========       ========       ========

Earnings:
   Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes ...   $ 25,035       $  3,095       ($13,628)
    Fixed charges per above .......................................     33,305         36,754         35,641
    Less interest capitalized during the period ...................       (150)          (318)        (1,179)
   Current period amortization of interest capitalized in prior
      periods .....................................................         62             92            163
                                                                      --------       --------       --------
        Earnings/deficiency in earnings, as adjusted ..............   $ 58,252       $ 39,623       $ 20,997
                                                                      ========       ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ................................       1.75           1.08           0.59
Ratio of deficiency in earnings to fixed charges ..................         --             --             --
</TABLE>

For purposes of this calculation, earnings/deficiency in earnings are defined as
income/(loss) before provision for income taxes, minority interest and
discontinued operations plus fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest
expense on all indebtedness (including amortization of deferred financing costs)
and the portion of operating lease rental expense which management believes is
representative of the interest factor of rent expense (approximately one-third
of rent expense).
EXHIBIT 32

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Safe Technologies International, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Randi Swatt, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Randi Swatt                         
|Randi Swatt, Chief Executive Officer and
|Acting Chief Financial Officer          



August 13, 2008
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 10.5.3      Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association Three Year 
                    Employment Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgement 
                    between Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association and
                    J.L. Thomas dated July 1, 1997.



               QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
                        THREE YEAR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                     RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



Name of Executive:  J.L. Thomas
                    --------------------------------------------



The undersigned executive does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly 
scheduled meeting on June 19, 1997, the Board of Directors of Quaker City 
Federal Savings and Loan Association acted to renew and extend the Quaker City 
Federal Savings and Loan Association Three Year Employment Agreement with the 
undersigned executive to a full thirty-six (36) month term, until June 30, 2000.


Dated this ____1st____ day of _______ July _________, A.D., _____ 1997 _______.




                                       QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
                                       ASSOCIATION



/s/ Jerome L. Thomas                   By: /s/ Frederic R. McGill
-----------------------------              -------------------------------
Executive                                  President
EX-10.20





 Exhibit 10.20 

AMENDMENT NO. 4 
 TO

 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

2013 STOCK OPTION PLAN 

WHEREAS, the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
Amended and Restated 2013 Stock Option Plan, as amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 (as amended, the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company have determined it in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan pursuant to
Section 13 thereof to provide for an additional number of Shares (as defined in the Plan) currently available under the Plan. 
 NOW THEREFORE,
effective as of the date approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Plan. 


  

	 	2.	 Stock Subject to the Plan. The second sentence of Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended and
restated in its entirety to reflect the increase in available options to read as follows: 


 “Subject to the
provisions of Section 12 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued upon exercise of such Options is Eighty Thousand Two Hundred Forty Seven (80,247) Shares.” 

Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

This Amendment has been adopted by the Board of Directors as of June 23, 2016.
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, Plaintiff/C0

### unterclaim Defendant,


### v. TECHNOMEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### ) Civil Case No. 09-529 (RJL) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### ORDER 

# fL..
---- Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, it is this .:sUday ofMarch, 2010, hereby 

### ORDERED that API's Motion to Dismiss Counts 1-3 and 5-6 ofTechnoMedia's Amended Counterclaim Pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [#39] is 

### GRANTED in part and 

### DENIED in part; it is further 

### ORDERED that Count I ofthe Amended Counterclaim is 

### DISMISSED with prejudice, except as to TechnoMedia's claim that API is wrongfully withholding TechnoMedia's trade secrets; it is further 

### ORDEREDthat Counts 2,3,5, and 6 ofthe Amended Counterclaim are 

### DISMISSED with prejudice; it is further 

### ORDEREDthat API's Motion to Strike Allegations ofthe Amended Counterclaim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) [#39] is 

### GRANTED; it is further 

### ORDERED that all allegations in the Amended Counterclaim concerning any association between API and Ecoman or between API and the Islamic Republic ofIranincluding, without limitation, the allegations contained at pages 1-2 and at paragraphs 30- 35, 77(d), 80(e), and 87 ofthe Amended Counterclaim-arehereby 

### STRICKEN; it is furtherORDERED that TechnoMedia's Application for Preliminary Injunction [#23] is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that TechnoMedia's Motion for Leave to File Deposition Transcript Excerpts ofPatrick Quinn in Support ofTechnoMedia's Application for Preliminary Injunction [#62] is DENIED. 

### SO ORDERED.

RICHA

. EON United States DistrictJudge

2
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000440 16-MAR-2020 09:26 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-4489) pertaining to the Sola Optical 401 (K) Savings Plan, the
Registration Statement and amendments (Form S-8 No. 33-93788, 333-14749 and 333-
61797) pertaining to the Sola International Inc. Stock Option Plan and the Sola
Investors' Stock Option Plan of Sola International Inc. and the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45929) pertaining to the registration of
$250,000,000 of common stock and/or debt securities of our report dated May 6,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sola
International Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
March 31, 2000.


                                                 /s/Ernst & Young LLP



Palo Alto, California
June 14, 2000
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALCANTAR ENTERPRISES, LLC

D/B/A ALCANTAR APARTMENTS,

Appellant,

v.

CARLOS GALLEGOS AND LUZ

MARIA RIVAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS NEXT FRIENDS OF JENNIFER

GALLEGOS AND ASHLEY

GALLEGOS, MINORS,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00165

- CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 2011

- DCV05300 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is a joint motion of the parties to reverse the trial court’s

judgment and remand this case to the trial court for entry of a new judgment pursuant to the

parties’ settlement agreement. We grant the motion and set aside the trial court’s judgment

without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in

accordance with the parties’ agreement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Costs of appeal are

taxed against Appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d). As requested by the parties, the mandate

will issue with the judgment and without delay. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.1(c).

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

May 4, 20 16

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.10.6     Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and
                    Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Karen
                    A. Tannheimer dated July 1, 2000.



                                QUAKER CITY BANK
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                      RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT



Name of Participant:              Karen A. Tannheimer
                    ----------------------------------------------------------



The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 15, 2000, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank
acted to renew and extend the Quaker City Bank Change in Control Agreement with
the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June
30, 2002.


Dated this ___1st___ day of ____July____, A.D., ______2000_______.



                                         QUAKER CITY BANK


/s/ Karen A. Tannheimer                  By:  /s/ Frederic R. McGill
---------------------------                 --------------------------
Participant                              President
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Klamath Fishery Management Council Meeting

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Klamath 
Fishery Management Council, established under the authority of the 
Klamath River Basin Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 460ss 
et seq.). The Klamath Fishery Management Council makes recommendations 
to agencies that regulate harvest of anadromous fish in the Klamath 
River Basin. The objectives of this meeting are to hear technical 
reports (including the ocean stock projection for Klamath River fall 
chinook in 2001), review the 2000 fishery season, and discuss and plan 
management of the 2001 season. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The Klamath Fishery Management Council will meet from 8:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m. on Thursday, February 22, 2001; and from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. on 
Friday, February 23, 2001.
    Place: The meeting will be held at the Yurok Tribal Office, Highway 
96, Weitchpec, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ronald A. Iverson, Project Leader, 
Fish and Wildlife Service, 1829 South Oregon Street, Yreka, California 
96097, telephone (530) 842-5763.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For background information on the Klamath 
Council, please refer to the notice of their initial meeting that 
appeared in the Federal Register on July 8, 1987 (52 FR 25639).

    Dated: February 7, 2001.
Elizabeth H. Stevens,
Acting California/Nevada Operations Manager, California/Nevada Office, 
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 01-3991 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
State 2,015 2,016 2,017 2,018

Alabama 16 20 21 35

Alaska 2222

Arizona 81 89 86 93

Arkansas 66 60 59 66

California 1,112 1,242 1,285 1,344

Colorado 93 102 101 110

Connecticut 91 97 92 98

Delaware 20 20 21 21

Florida 87 83 87 94

Georgia 186 175 185 201

Hawaii 1111

Idaho 360 399 397 408

Illinois 534 583 579 612

Indiana 454 484 502 498

Iowa 964 1,040 993 1,038

Kansas 196 227 238 249

Kentucky 401 347 351 420

Louisiana 79 80 78 106

Maine 197 200 191 228

Maryland 216 214 214 263

Massachusetts 118 116 117 125

Michigan 1,099 1,203 1,196 1,313

Minnesota 2,698 3,047 3,045 3,058

Mississippi 65 67 65 75

Missouri 625 640 583 645

Montana 51 61 70 71

Nebraska 156 174 165 182

Nevada 19 26 27 20

New Hampshire 83 72 72 92

New Jersey 45 46 44 51

New Mexico 135 144 149 160

New York 2,540 2,513 2,461 2,970

North Carolina 179 180 185 202

North Dakota 65 70 70 79

Ohio 1,036 1,094 1,111 1,234

Oklahoma 100 109 105 143

Oregon 160 156 160 206

Pennsylvania 2,169 2,238 2,208 2,667

Puerto Rico 42 41 45 233

Rhode Island 12 10 9 9

South Carolina 28 33 30 49

South Dakota 210 233 223 238

Tennessee 262 265 270 288

Texas 371 413 412 417

Utah 173 188 184 193

Vermont 588 579 589 738

Virginia 380 377 405 438

Washington 317 306 326 368

West Virginia 28 28 27 54

Wisconsin 6,188 6,787 6,540 7,445

Wyoming 4 6 6 11

Total 25,102 26,687 26,382 29,661

Table 1: Dairy Operations Establishing Production History for 2015 through 2018 Margin Protection Program (MPP)

January 12, 2023 *

*Note:  For coverage years 2014, an automated system was not in place. As a result, the number of dairy operations with established production

history is not available for the 2014 coverage year.

Number of Dairy Operatiosn with Established Production History

Prepared by USDA/Farm Service Agency
Opinion issued August 2 2 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00560
- CV

——————————— IN RE AXIS ENERGY MARKETING, LLC , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 3, 2023, relator Axis Energy Marketing, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order signed on August 1, 2023 by the Honorable Robert Schaffer, who was sitting for the Honorable Beau Miller. In this order, t he motion to expedit e discovery filed by real party in interest Apricus Enterprises, LLC was granted and authorized the deposition of a corporate2

representative of relator Axis Energy

. 1 On the same day, Axis Energy filed its petition and a motion for emergency relief. Real party Apricus Enterprises filed a response to the motion for emergency relief. On August 3, 2023, this Court issued an order granting the motion for emergency relief, staying the challenged August 1, 2023 order to permit the
Honorable Beau Miller to recon sider the order signed by the Honorable Robert Schaffer. On August 4, 2023, relator Axis Energy filed a motion to dismiss the original proceeding because the parties had reached an agreement regarding the expedited discovery order and resolved the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus. The certificate of conference to this motion to dismiss indicates that real party Apricus Enterprises is unopposed to the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the petition. Th e stay of the trial court’s August 3, 2023 order is lifted. Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

1 The underlying case is Apricus Enterprises, LLC v. Axis Energy Marketing, LLC , cause number 2023

- 47355 , pending in the 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Beau Miller presiding.