alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2440 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2440

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 9 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

                 May 12 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to authorize 
  appropriations for fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 1996, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Independent Safety Board Act 
Amendments of 1993''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 309(a) of the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 (49 
U.S.C. App. 1907(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``There are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of 
this Act not to exceed $37,580,000 for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1994, $44,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, 
and $45,100,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996; such 
sums to remain available until expended.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 8, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 38 (Monday, February 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11570-11571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. MG01-20-000]


Egan Hub Partners, L.P.; Notice of Filing

February 20, 2001.
    On February 12, 2001, Egan Hub Partners, L.P. filed revised 
standards of conduct under Order No. 637.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Regulation of Short-Term Natural Gas Transportation 
Services, and Regulation of Interstate Natural Gas Transportation 
Services, Order No. 637, 65 Fed. Reg. 10156 (February 25, 2000), III 
FERC Stats. & Regs. para. 31,091 (February 9, 2000), Order No. 637-
A, 65 Fed. Reg. 35705 (June 5, 2000), III FERC Stats. & Regs. para. 
21,099 (May 19, 2000), Order No. 637-B, 92 FERC para. 61,062 (2000).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 11571]]

    Egan Hub Partners, L.P. states that it served copies of the filing 
on all customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest in this proceeding with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 
385.214). All such motions to intervene or protest should be filed on 
or before March 7, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of these filings 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4577 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00388-CR

Robert Charles Haywood, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2040917, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Robert Haywood pleaded guilty to habitual theft. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann.

§ 31.03(a), (e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2004-05). The court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to

180 days in a state jail.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to

examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: April 14, 2005

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit. 32.2

                  CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 12 INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John J. Park, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/      John J. Park
         -------------------------

         John J. Park
         Chief Financial Officer
               3/10/04
         -------------------------
         Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated and will be retained by Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                      -28-
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1903

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the credit for

dependent care expenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1993

Mrs. MALONEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the credit for dependent care expenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Afford5 ability Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CREDIT FOR DEPENDENT CARE EX7 PENSES.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 21(a) of

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expenses

10 for household and dependent care services necessary for
2

•HR 1903 IH

1 gainful employment) is amended by striking ‘‘30 percent

2 reduced (but not below 20 percent)’’ and inserting ‘‘60

3 percent reduced (but not below 40 percent)’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

6 December 31, 1993.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          48,923
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    382,238
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,102
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,935
<LOANS>                                      1,522,240
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,995,150
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,561,136
<SHORT-TERM>                                   182,818
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,110
<LONG-TERM>                                    100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              113
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,995,150
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 63,970
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,358
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                76,328
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              32,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,403
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           37,192
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,706
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (211)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,198
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      17,198
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,679
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.31
<LOANS-NON>                                     14,511
<LOANS-PAST>                                       910
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                22,168
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,753
<RECOVERIES>                                       877
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,998
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            23,998
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
ROYAL
BODYCARE, INC.



Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Royal BodyCare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003 (the Report), I, Steven E. Brown, Vice President-Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven E.
Brown

Steven E. Brown

Vice President-Finance

and

Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2003



This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
941 A.2d 1256

#### Edward M. MAZUR; Jeffrey W. Bull; and An Unincorporated Association Citizens Against Tax Incremental Financing, Petitioners, v. TRINITY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; Trinity School Board; and Emily Minor; Jerry Chambers; Charles McCreary; Stephanie Komorowski; Kathy Penkowski; Dennis McWreath, Respondents. Edward M. Mazur; Jeffrey W. Bull; and An Unincorporated Association, Citizens Against Tax Incremental Financing, Petitioners, v. Washington County; Washington County Board of Commissioners; Commissioner Bracken Burns and Commissioner Larry Maggi, Respondents. Edward M. Mazur; Jeffrey W. Bull; and An Unincorporated Association, Citizens Against Tax Incremental Financing, Petitioners, v. South Strabane Township; South Strabane Township Board of Supervisors; Anthony Zelenka, Charles Kosey and Billy Bell, as Supervisors, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 2, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issues *207set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

> (1) Whether the Court has jurisdiction to review municipal decisions approving a TIF District supported by public funds?

> (2) Whether Plaintiffs’ allegations that the defendants made findings of blight in bad faith, are sufficient to withstand a demurrer?
DEQUIAN DEMORRAL 

WATSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4363

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11283-11284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-230-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 16, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 13, 2001 Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, with an effective date of February 1, 2001.
    ESNG states that the purpose of this instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to storage services purchased from 
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) under its Rate 
Schedules GSS and LSS. The costs of the above referenced storage 
services comprise the rates and charges payable under ESNG's respective 
Rate Schedules GSS and LSS. This tracking filing is being made pursuant 
to Section 3 of ESNG's Rate Schedules GSS and LSS.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional

[[Page 11284]]

customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in 
lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on 
the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4507 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of the undersigned officers and
directors of CSX Trade Receivables Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, which is
to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., a Form
10-K (Annual Report) on behalf of the CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust
(issuer in respect of the CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust 6.00% Trade
Receivables Participation Certificates, Series 1998-1), hereby constitutes and
appoints Ellen M. Fitzsimmons and Rachel E. Geiersbach his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead to sign
said Form 10-K, and any and all amendments thereto, with power where appropriate
to affix the corporate seal of CSX Trade Receivables Corporation thereto and to
attest said seal, and to file said Form 10-K, and any and all other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do
and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could
do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact
and agents may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 28th
day of March, 2002.

                                         /s/ DAVID H. BAGGS
                                         -----------------------------
                                         David H. Baggs


                                         /s/ DAVID A. BOOR
                                         -----------------------------
                                         David A. Boor


                                         /s/ ALLEN C. GOOLSBY, III
                                         -----------------------------
                                         Allen C. Goolsby, III


                                         /s/ LESLIE A. GRANDIS
                                         -----------------------------
                                         Leslie A. Grandis

                                      -1-
#### Maurice GARVIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Secretary, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-8063.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 2007.

Decided: March 30, 2007.

*346Maurice Garvin, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Garvin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Garvin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP v KALAMAZOO COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

*Oshtemo Charter Township v Kalamazoo County Road Commission,*Docket No. 304986, originally published on pages 462-481 of the advance sheets has been vacated by the Court of Appeals. The new opinion is located at 302 Mich App _.