alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1990 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1990

  To authorize a project to demonstrate the feasibility of voting by 
                               telephone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1993

Mr. Richardson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize a project to demonstrate the feasibility of voting by 
                               telephone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) perfecting voting by telephone would greatly enhance 
        voter participation; and
            (2) the national laboratories have the technology to 
        monitor the results of telephone voting and to ensure the 
        security of the process.

SEC. 2. DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.

    The Federal Election Commission shall make a grant to a consortium 
described in section 4 for the purpose of conducting a project to 
demonstrate the feasibility of voting by telephone.

SEC. 3. MATTERS TO BE ADDRESSED.

    A demonstration project under section 2 shall explore the following 
areas of interest:
            (1) Ensuring that each voter votes only once and that the 
        vote is tallied, stored, and reported correctly.
            (2) Ensuring the anonymity of the voter by means of a 
        confidential but simple method to identify each voter.
            (3) Ensuring that the system cannot be accessed by 
        outsiders or insiders for the purpose of changing votes.
            (4) Ensuring that the system remains accessible and secure 
        to callers throughout the voting period.
            (5) Ensuring the encryption of voters' choices to minimize 
        fraud.
            (6) Exploring future security options, such as the use of 
        voice biometrics for voter identification.
            (7) Studying the effect of telephone voting on 
        participation rates.

SEC. 4. CONSORTIUM.

    A consortium referred to in section 2 is a consortium that includes 
a State government and one or more of the national laboratories.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 to carry out 
this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                                    AMENDMENT

     This Amendment, dated as of May 17, 2006, by and between John M. Bond,an
adult individual, and Fulton Financial Corporation, a Pennsylvania financial
holding company.

                                   BACKGROUND

     Pursuant to Stock Option Agreements date May 12, 2003, January 26, 2004
and January 31, 2005 (the "Agreements"), Mr. John M. Bond was granted certain
stock options (the "Options"). The terms and conditions of those Agreements
indicate that Mr. Bond would be required to exercise his Options within 3 months
of his retirement as an officer of The Columbia Bank. However, the parties
desire that Mr. Bond be permitted to exercise his Options until three months
after he retires as a director of The Columbia Bank, as permitted by the stock
option agreements pursuant to which options were issued to him in years prior to
2003.

NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows:

1. Paragraph 5(C) is hereby amended, in its entirety, to read as follows:

     "(C) Directors and Consultants. The foregoing provisions of this Paragraph
(5) shall not apply if the Option is granted to a director or consultant of the
Company or a Subsidiary who is not also an employee of the Company or a
Subsidiary on the date of grant; provided, however, that an employee director
who is deemed a 'Key Employee' shall also be exempted from the foregoing
provisions of this Paragraph (5)."

2. Except as amended hereby, the Agreements remain in full force and effect on
the terms and conditions stated therein.

Fulton Financial Corporation

-------------------------------------


-------------------------------------
John M. Bond, Jr.
942 A.2d 894

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Edward BORZELLECA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 14, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

> Whether the Superior Court misapplied the unambiguous language of the 2002 amendment to the compulsory joinder rule, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110, that limited the rule by requiring joinder of only crimes that “occurred within the same judicial district” as a former prosecution, an amendment that this Court has not yet authoritatively interpreted?

Petitioner’s Application to File Amended Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 
  

 
 



 
 August 8, 2016 
 Allan
Dicks 
 Re: Executive Compensation Package 
 Dear
Allan: 
 The following summarizes the terms of your executive compensation package, which is conditioned upon the commencement of your employment with
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. In addition to company benefit plans offered to you from time to time by the Company, you shall be eligible for the following compensation package: 

Title: Chief Financial Officer 
 Base
Compensation: $200,000 per year 
 Cash Bonus Program: The cash bonus program you are eligible for will be separately determined based on
criteria set by the board of directors of Montrose and Vijay Manthripragada, Chief Executive Officer, and all payments thereunder remain subject to board approval. 

IPO/Change in Control Cash Bonus Amount: $1,000,000 shall be payable to you in cash upon the occurrence of a change in control or effectiveness of an
Initial Public Offering of the Company. A change in control shall be defined as set forth in the Company’s equity incentive plan. 
 Equity
Incentive Award: You will be granted 5,000 options under the Company’s equity incentive program. The options shall vest over a four year period, with 50% vesting at the second anniversary of the vesting start date and the remaining 50%
vesting at the fourth anniversary of the vesting start date. The options shall fully accelerate upon a change in control of the Company (not including an Initial Public Offering) as set forth in the Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 2013 Amended
and Restated Stock Option Plan. 
 Severance Upon Termination Without Cause Following a Change in Control: If you are terminated without cause or
terminate your employment for good reason within twelve (12) months following a change in control of the Company, you shall be entitled to receive severance in the amount of one year of your then-current base salary, which may be payable in
lump sum or as continued compensation during the 12 month severance period, as determined by the Company. 
 We look forward to your future success with
Montrose. 
 Regards, 
 /s/ Vijay Manthripragada 

Vijay Manthripragada 
 Chief Executive Officer 

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 
  

							
	 Global Headquarters

1 Park Plaza
 Suite 1000

Irvine, CA 92614
	  	 T: 949.988.3500
 F: 949.988.3514

info@montrose-env.com
 www.montrose-env.com
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Salvador CUELLAR-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-40624

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 2, 2014.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed because the prior conviction of defendant in Texas court for delivery of marijuana was a drug trafficking offense, warranting the 16-level enhancement of his sentence. *United States v. Marban-Calderon,*631 F.3d 210 (5th Cir.2011).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
om DO99

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

Residential Energy Credit Carryforward

>» Attach to Form 1040.

OMB No. 1545-0214

1986

Attachment
Sequence No. 30

Name(s) as shown on Form 1040

Your social security number

Enter the address of your principal residence on which the credit is claimed if it 1s different from the address shown on Form 1040,

Fill in this part to figure the residential energy credit for 1986.

1 Enter your energy credit carryforward from a previous tax year but only if it is $10 or more. (This should
be the amount on line 32 of your 1985 Form 5695. Caution—You do not have a carryforward if your

1985 Form 1040, line 50, shows an amount of more than zero.)

2 Enter the amount of tax shown on Form 1040, line 40

3 Add lines 41, 42, and 43 from Form 1040 and enter the total .

4 Subtract line 3 from line 2. If zero or less, enter zero .

5 _ Residential energy credit. Enter the amount shown on line 1 or line 4, whichever is less. Also, add this amount
to the total on Form 1040, line 44. Write “REC” and show the amount on the dotted line next to that total. | 5

| Part 11] Fill in this part to figure your carryforward to 1987 (complete only if line 5 is less than line 1).

6 Enter amount from Part, line 1

7 Enter amount from Part |, line 5

8 Credit carryforward to 1987 (subtract line 7 from line 6). (if te less than $10, you do not have a

carryforward to 1987.)

General Instructions

Paperwork Reduction Act Notice.—We
ask for this information to carry out the
Internal Revenue laws of the United States.
We need it to ensure that taxpayers are
complying with these laws and to allow us to
figure and collect the right amount of tax.
You are required to give us this information.

A Change You Should Note.—1985 was
the last year that expenditures made for

energy saving items qualified for the
residential energy credit. No carryforward
will be allowed for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1987.

Purpose of Form.—Use this form to claim
your residential energy credit carryforward
from 1985 to 1986. If your energy credit is
more than your tax minus lines 41, 42, and
43 of Form 1040, you may carryforward the
excess energy credit to 1987.

Specific | Instructions

Part I, Line 1.—Generally, your energy
credit carryforward will be computed on
your prior year Form 5695. Exception—If
the alternative minimum tax applied, see
Publication 909, Alternative Minimum Tax.

Part Il.—Complete this part only if line 5 is
less than line 1. You can carryforward the
amount entered on line 8 to 1987, if itis
$10 or more.

Form 5695 (1986)
May 12, 1999

Avondale Industries, Inc.
Post Office Box 50280
New Orleans, Louisiana  70150

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information of Avondale Industries,  Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended
March 31, 1999 and 1998,  as indicated in our report dated May 6, 1999;  because
we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  quarter  ended  March  31,  1999 is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333- 32165 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(C) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                               GC COMPANIES, INC.

                                OCTOBER 31, 2000

                              EXHIBIT TO FORM 10-K


Computation of weighted average number of shares outstanding used in determining
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Year Ended October 31,
(In thousands)                                     2000              1999            1998
                                                   ----             ----             ----
<S>                                               <C>               <C>              <C>
BASIC

1.       Weighted average number of
         common shares outstanding                7,750             7,715            7,710
                                                  =====             =====            =====


DILUTED (A)

1.       Weighted average number of
         common shares outstanding                7,750             7,715            7,710

2.       Diluted effect of shares issuable
         on exercise of stock options, net
         of shares assumed to be purchased
         out of proceeds of market price              -                 -                -
                                                  -----             -----             -----

3.       Weighted average number of shares
         used in diluted per share
         computations                             7,750             7,715             7,710
                                                  =====             =====             =====
</TABLE>


(A)      This calculation is submitted in accordance with Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934 Release No. 9083.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the annual report of Natural Health Trends Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chris T. Sharng, the principal executive officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: March 31, 2008 /s/ Chris T. Sharng   Chris T. Sharng   President
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Banknorth Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three
months ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                        /s/ Peter J. Verrill
                                        --------------------
                                    Name: Peter J. Verrill
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin CAINE, a.k.a. Foolish, a.k.a. Benji, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-15375

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 27, 2014.

Cherie Krigsman, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Diidri Robinson, Angela Dougan Sherrer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Tracy N. DaCruz, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, Maurice C. Grant, II, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Benjamin Caine in this appeal of his revocation of supervised release and his resulting sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Caine’s revocation and his resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000829044                       
<NAME>                                         PLUMA, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998               
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998               
<CASH>                          2,563,866                      
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  40,781,828
<ALLOWANCES>                    1,734,356                    
<INVENTORY>                    69,555,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              117,912,533
<PP&E>                         70,884,152
<DEPRECIATION>                 24,667,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                200,224,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          32,044,163
<BONDS>                       105,393,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                       36,849,127
<OTHER-SE>                     21,509,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  200,224,502
<SALES>                       144,865,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              144,865,133
<CGS>                         133,250,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 133,250,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    4,467
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              5,481,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (8,348,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (3,038,681)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (5,309,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (5,309,343)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.65)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part N, National Institutes of Health, of the Statement of 
Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the 
Department of Health and Human Services (40 FR 22859, May 27, 1975, as 
amended most recently at 65 FR 38848, June 22, 2000, and redesignated 
from Part HN as Part N at 60 FR 56606, November 9, 1995) is amended as 
set forth below to reflect the establishment of the Office of the 
Ombudsman/Center for Cooperative Resolution within the Office of the 
Director, NIH.
    Section N-B, Organization and Functions, under the heading Office 
of the Director (NA, formerly HNA) is amended by inserting immediately 
after the paragraph for the Office of Bioengineering and Bioimaging 
(HNAC) the following:
    Office of the Ombudsman/Center for Cooperative Resolution (NAS, 
formerly HNAS). (1) Provides overall leadership, direction, and 
oversight on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) policies, programs, 
and activities at NIH; (2) acts as the focal point for information and 
activity relating to conflict management and ADR; (3) advises the NIH 
Director and staff on matters relating to dispute resolution and 
conflict management, generally, and to the specific application of ADR 
throughout NIH; (4) assists managers and employees in a confidential, 
informal, impartial, and independent way in resolving work-related 
issues and disputes, including receiving and inquiring into workplace 
disputes brought to the Ombudsman by any NIH staff member, initiating 
independent inquiries, identifying and analyzing systemic issues that 
foster workplace disputes, and making recommendations to the 
appropriate responsible agency official(s) for changes in policies and 
procedures; (5) develops and implements ADR policies and procedures and 
administers ADR programs to facilitate the resolution of workplace 
disputes; (6) develops and provides conflict prevention services 
including training and education; and (7) works cooperatively and 
collaborates with NIH components that administer formal dispute 
resolution mechanisms.

Delegations of Authority Statement

    All delegations and redelegations of authority to offices and 
employees of NIH that were in effect immediately prior to the effective 
date of this reorganization and are consistent with this reorganization 
shall continue in effect, pending further redelegation.

    Dated: February 13, 2001.
Ruth L. Kirschstein,
Acting Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 01-4456 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M