alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Untitled Document


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED ADVISORY AGREEMENT


THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATATED ADVISORY  AGREEMENT,  made as of May 17, 2006,
between  WINTHROP  REALTY TRUST,  an Ohio business  trust (f/k/a First Union Real Estate
Equity and Mortgage  Investments)  (the  “Trust”), and FUR ADVISORS LLC (the
“Advisor”).


WHEREAS,
the  Trust  and the  Advisor  are  party to that  certain  Amended  and  Restated
Advisory  Agreement  dated  November 7, 2005 (the  “Advisory  Agreement”)
pursuant to which the Advisor was  retained to provide  advisory services to the Company;


WHEREAS,
the Trust and the Advisor desire to amend the Advisory Agreement as hereinafter provided;


NOW,
THEREFORE,  in consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements herein set
forth, the  parties hereto agree as follows:


1.
      Capitalized  Terms.  Capitalized  terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have
the  meaning ascribed thereto in the Advisory Agreement.


2.  Amendments  to Advisory  Agreement.  Section  4.1(a) of the  Advisory  Agreement,  is
hereby  amended by deleting the second sentence thereof in its entirety and inserting the
following in lieu thereof


	 	“If
the amount  determined for a calendar quarter  pursuant to clause (ii) of the foregoing
sentence  exceeds the amount  determined  for such calendar  quarter  pursuant to clause
(i) of the foregoing  sentence,  such excess  amount  shall be applied  against  future
amounts due under this Section 4.1 and, if such excess  amount is not fully  applied
against  future  amounts  within  eight  calendar  quarters,  such  amount  then
remaining shall be paid by the Advisor to FUR within 30 days of such determination.”





3.
      Miscellaneous.  (a) Except as  modified  hereby,  the  Advisory  Agreement  remains in
full  force and effect and the provisions thereof are hereby ratified and confirmed.


(b)
All  references  in the Advisory  Agreement to “this  Agreement”,  “hereunder”,
“hereto” or  similar  references,  and all references in all other documents to
the Advisory  Agreement shall  hereinafter be deemed  references to the Advisory
Agreement as amended hereby.


(c)
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,  all of which together shall
for  all  purposes  constitute  one  amendment,  binding on all parties  hereto,
notwithstanding  that the parties have not  signed the same counterparts.










IN
WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have executed this  Agreement as of the date and
year first  above written.




	 	WINTHROP REALTY TRUST
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 By: 	 	 	 
	 	 	

	 	 	 Peter Braverman 

President 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 FUR ADVISORS LLC
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 FUR Holdings LLC 

Managing Member 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By: 	 WEM-FUR Investors LLC 

Managing Member 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 By:	 
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	Michael L. Ashner 

    Managing Member 



2
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2(B)

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2
                         TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     This AMENDMENT NO. 2 to the Consulting Agreement between the parties is
entered into by and between Michael Baker Corporation, a Pennsylvania
Corporation (the "Corporation") and Richard L. Shaw, an individual (the
"Executive"), effective April 26, 2005.

WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into the Consulting
Agreement, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A,
effective April 25, 2001, and continuing for a two (2) year term until April 26,
2003; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into Amendment No. 1 to
Consulting Agreement, effective April 26, 2003, a true and correct copy of which
is attached hereto as Exhibit B, extending the term of the Consulting Agreement
for an additional two (2) year period until April 26, 2005; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive now desire to extend the term of the
Consulting Agreement upon the same terms and conditions for an additional one
(1) year period until April 26, 2006;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and
other good and valuable consideration, and intending to be legally bound hereby,
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

     The term of the Consulting Agreement effective April 25, 2001 between the
     parties as amended by Amendment No. 1 effective April 26, 2003 shall be,
     and the same hereby is, extended for an additional one (1) year period from
     April 26, 2005 until April 26, 2006 upon the same terms and conditions.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, effective April 26, 2005, the parties have executed
this AMENDMENT NO. 2 to the Consulting Agreement.

Attest:                                 MICHAEL BAKER CORPORATION
                                        (The Corporation")


/s/ H. James McKnight                   By: /s/ Donald F. Fusilli, Jr.
-------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
H. James McKnight                           Donald P. Fusilli, Jr.
Corporate Secretary                         President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer


Witness:                                Richard L. Shaw
                                        (The "Executive")


/s/ Silvana Travanti                    /s/ Richard L. Shaw
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EG01-128-000]

Take notice that the above-referenced notice (66 FR 10278, February 14, 2001) was inadvertently issued under Docket No. EG01-43-000. Since then, it has been reasigned a new docket number as captioned above.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4194 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00013-CV

IN RE MARK FISHER AND REECE 

BOUDREAUX

RELATORS

AND

NO. 02-11-00014-CV

IN RE BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relators’ petitions for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petitions for writ of 

mandamus are denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 1, 2012

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 10679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-3910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-227-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 12, 2001.
    Take notice that on February 8, 2001, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America (Natural) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, to be effective March 12, 2001.
    Natural states that the purpose of this filing is to revise Rate 
Schedule FRSS, so that customers can elect a ``storage-only'' option in 
lieu of a delivered storage service. Customers can then use separately 
contracted transportation (including released capacity) for deliveries 
of gas withdrawn from storage. Deliveries to the city-gate or to an 
end-use facility may still be made on a firm no-notice basis, provided 
the Shipper meets the requirements in the new Section 7.5(b) Rate 
Schedule FRSS.
    Natural states that copies of the filing have been mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the 
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-3910 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Jorge Armando DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K.W. PRUNTY, Undersecretary; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-16352.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Dec. 22, 2010.

*103Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jorge Armando Diaz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice Diaz’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming that the grievance process used by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) deprived him of his First and Fourteenth Amendment right to access the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s decision to dismiss for failure to state a claim under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, *Byrd v. Maricopa Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t,*565 F.3d 1205, 1212 (9th Cir.2009), and we affirm.

Diaz contends that the CDCR’s process violated his right to access the courts because a CDCR appeals coordinator rejected as untimely Diaz’s grievance concerning certain searches for contraband. As a result, Diaz was unable to properly exhaust his administrative remedies, leading to the dismissal of a previous federal action challenging the searches. In order to allege a cognizable claim, Diaz must plead, among other things, that prison officials caused his inability to access the courts. *See Crumpton v. Gates,*947 F.2d 1418, 1420 (9th Cir.1991). Diaz admits that the only cause of his failure to file a timely grievance was a delay in obtaining evidence. However, Diaz was not required to submit evidence with his grievance. *See*Cal.Code Regs., tit. 15, § 3084.2(a). CDCR officials thus did not cause his inability to exhaust, and Diaz cannot show that the CDCR proximately caused any denial of access he may have suffered.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlink Global Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Anastasios N. Kyriakides, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
Bill Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and b) The information contained in
     this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
     condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Anastasios N. Kyriakides
----------------------------
Anastasios N. Kyriakides
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Bill Rodriguez
------------------
Bill Rodriguez
Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Reggie Roman, hereby certify to Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. that:

1.       I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
         July 31, 2002 for Psychiatric Solutions, Inc (which for such quarter
         and as of July 31, 2002 was PMR Corporation only and did not include
         any combined operations of Psychiatric Solutions and PMR Corporation);

2.       Based on my knowledge, such quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by such quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the PMR Corporation as of, and for the periods presented
         in such quarterly report.

         I understand the Psychiatric Solutions is relying on this
representation in connection with its filing of the 10-Q for the quarter ended
July 31, 2002 for the operations of PMR Corporation prior to the completion of
the merger between Psychiatric Solutions and PMR.


Date: September 13, 2002

                                              /s/ Reggie Roman
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Reggie Roman
                                              Former Chief Financial Officer of
                                              PMR Corporation
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00460-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.W.M., AN ADULT

On Appeal from the

54th District Court of McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-1135-C2

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Appellee, THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, is exempt from all costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 25, 2021
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 23

                      Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




<PAGE>
 
 
             [LETTERHEAD OF MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP APPEARS HERE]


To the Board of Directors
GFS Bancorp, Inc.
Grinnell, Iowa  50112

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the GFS Bancorp, Inc.
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-84814) of GFS Bancorp, Inc.,
pertaining to the GFS Bancorp, Inc. 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, 
of our report dated July 24, 1996, which appears on page 19 of the annual 
report on Form 10-KSB of GFS Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year 
ended June 30, 1996.



                                       /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                       McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
September 25, 1996
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authority contained in the Act of November 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1700, 16 U.S.C. Sec. 192b-10, and as certain lands authorized for acquisition by the Secretary of the Interior have now been acquired, the boundaries of Rocky Mountain National Park are being adjusted accordingly. 

# DATES:

Effective February 15, 2001. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The above cited Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain lands adjacent to Rocky Mountain National Park and, upon acquisition, to adjust the park boundary to include such lands within the park. The total acreage of Rocky Mountain National Park will be increased by 5.14 acres by this boundary adjustment. 

Subject to valid existing rights, the following described lands are hereby added to Rocky Mountain National Park to be administered in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable thereto: 

Township 4 North, Range 73 West, 6th Principal Meridian, Larimer County, Colorado; 

Lot 4, Baldpate Estates, according to the plat thereof recorded April 3, 1986, at Reception No. 86016631;

Contains 5.14 acres, more or less. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chief, Land Resources Program Center, Intermountain Region, P.O. Box 728, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-0728. 

Dated: December 20, 2000. 

Karen P. Wade, 

Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. 

[FR Doc. 01-4011 Filed 2-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTON 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southeast Acquisitions II, L P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ending March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissions on the date hereof I,
Richard W. Sorenson, the principal executive officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operation
            of the Partnership.

/s/ Richard W. Sorenson
------------------------------------
Richard W. Sorenson

Richard W. Sorenson
Principal Executive Officer & Member
Southern Management Group, LLC
May 2, 2006
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTON 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southeast Acquisitions II, L P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ending March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissions on the date hereof I,
Laura E. Ristvedt, the principal financial officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operation
            of the Partnership.

/s/ Laura E. Restvedt
-----------------------------
Laura E. Ristvedt

Laura E. Ristvedt
Principal Financial Officer
Southern Management Group, LLC
May 2, 2006
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*July 29, 2014*

[Cite as *0712912014 Case Announcements,*2014-Ohio-3296.]

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2014-0846.

#### State ex rel. Sultaana v. Bova.

Cuyahoga App. No. 100875, 2014-Ohio-1737. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, it is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to and filed with the clerk of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County:
<PAGE>

                  OPINION RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   Exhibit (21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant

   Name of Incorporation               State or Other            Date of
     or Organization                   Jurisdiction            Incorporation
     ---------------                   ------------            -------------

Macro International Inc.               Delaware                March 17, 1972

Social & Health Services, Ltd.         Maryland                June 17, 1991

ORC, Inc.                              Delaware                December 16, 1991

European Information Centre Limited    United Kingdom          December 20, 1991

ORC Holdings, Ltd.                     United Kingdom          July 17, 1996

ORC Korea, Ltd.                        Korea                   November 30, 1996

ORC International Holdings, Inc.       Cayman Islands          March 18, 1997

ORC TeleService Corp.                  Delaware                March 26, 1997

Opinion Research Corporation,
    S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico, D.F.            July 10, 1997

ORC ProTel, Inc.                       Delaware                November 20, 1997

O.R.C. International Ltd.              United Kingdom          December 15, 1997

ORC Consumer, Inc.                     Delaware                June 5, 2000