alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of
Collegiate Pacific Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ William R. EstillWilliam R. Estill, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2322 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2322

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to clarify 
    that certain footwear assembled in CBI beneficiary countries is 
                   excluded from duty-free treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1993

  Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to clarify 
    that certain footwear assembled in CBI beneficiary countries is 
                   excluded from duty-free treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF FOOTWEAR AND LEATHER-RELATED PRODUCTS.

    U.S. Note 2 to subchapter II of chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (b), by inserting ``footwear, leather-
        related products,'' after ``apparel article,'';
            (2) by striking the flush sentence following subparagraph 
        (ii); and
            (3) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(c) As used in this note--
            ``(i) the term `beneficiary country' means a country listed 
        in general note 3(c)(v)(A); and
            ``(ii) the term `leather-related products' means articles 
        of handbags, luggage, flat goods, work gloves, and leather 
        wearing apparel described in section 213(h)(1) of the Caribbean 
        Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 U.S.C. 2703(h)(1)).''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendments made by section 1 apply with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Application to Termination of Previous 
Suspension.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed 
with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse 
for consumption, of any good described in the amendments made by 
section 1 shall, if such entry or withdrawal was made--
            (1) after September 30, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal 
occurred on the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2311

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit nonparty

multicandidate political committee contributions in elections for Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1993

Mr. GILCHREST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit nonparty multicandidate political committee contributions in elections for Federal office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY

4 NONPARTY MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

5 COMMITTEES IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL

6 OFFICE.

7 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

8 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

9 the following new subsection:
2

•HR 2311 IH

1 ‘‘(i)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 Act, no nonparty multicandidate political committee may

3 make any contribution to a candidate for Federal office.

4 ‘‘(2) As used in this subsection, the term

5 ‘multicandidate political committee’ has the meaning given

6 that term in subsection (a)(4).’’.

Æ
941 A.2d 671

#### In the Interest of S.R., Petition of S.R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Dec. 28, 2007.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that a mother’s questioning of her daughter, who alleged sexual abuse, was nontestimonial for Confrontation Clause and *Crawford*purposes?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,688,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,510,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,005,379
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,492,632
<PP&E>                                         673,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                 817,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,591,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,843,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        35,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,505,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,591,725
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,374,956
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,674,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               417,832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               645,489
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                837,901
<INCOME-TAX>                                   344,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            493,901
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   493,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                 OPINION RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Exhibit (21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
       NAME OF INCORPORATION         STATE OR OTHER       DATE OF
          OR ORGANIZATION             JURISDICTION     INCORPORATION
-----------------------------------  --------------  -----------------
<S>                                  <C>             <C>
 
Quality Expectations, Inc.           Illinois        November 6, 1991
 
ORC, Inc.                            Delaware        December 16, 1991
 
European Information Centre, Ltd.    England         December 20, 1991
 
ORC Holdings, Limited                England         July 17, 1996
 
ORC Korea                            Korea           November 30, 1996
 
ORC International Holdings, Inc.     Cayman Islands  March 18, 1997
 
ORC TeleService                      Florida         March 26, 1997
 
ORC Mexico                           Mexico, D.F.    July 10, 1997
 
ORC ProTel, Inc.                     Delaware        November 20, 1997
 
ORC International, Limited           England         December 15, 1997
 
</TABLE>
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD 

77K Street, NE Washington, DC 20002 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 13, 2017 

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

ANNOUNCES A RELAXATION OF HARDSHIP WITHDRAWAL

RULES TO HELP VICTIMS OF HURRICANE IRMA

 

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) announced today 

that it has made a temporary change to the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) hardship withdrawal rules 

to help victims of Hurricane Irma pursuant to the guidance issued by the Internal Revenue 

Service on September 12. 

Beginning today, the TSP will treat any Financial Hardship In-Service Withdrawal Request

(Form TSP-76) received until January 24, 2018 as qualifying for a hardship withdrawal if the 

participant writes “Hurricane Irma” at the top of the form and checks the block on the form for 

personal casualty on page 2, Item 18 of the form. The distributions must occur before January 31, 

2018 to qualify for this treatment. 

The participant should write “Hurricane Irma” at the top of the form and check the “personal 

casualty” box on the TSP-76. The TSP will then waive the rule that prohibits a participant from 

making employee contributions for 6 months after taking a hardship withdrawal. This will allow 

an employee to continue to make contributions to the TSP and receive the employer match (if 

eligible). This temporary change will not be effective retroactively. For more information, please 

go to https://www.tsp.gov/whatsnew/plan/planNews.shtml.

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for federal employees; it 

is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private 

employers. As of July 2017, TSP assets totaled approximately 

$511 billion, and retirement savings accounts were being 

maintained for over 5 million TSP participants. Participants 

include federal civilian employees in all branches of 

government, employees of the U.S. Postal Service, and members of 

the uniformed services. Additional information can be found at 

www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT: 

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641 

(end)
EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Cadus Pharmaceutical Corporation:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (Nos.
333-21871 and 333-58151) on Form S-8 of Cadus Pharmaceutical  Corporation of our
report  dated March 15, 2002,  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of
Cadus  Pharmaceutical  Corporation  and  subsidiary  as of December 31, 2001 and
2000,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,  stockholders'
equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year  period  ended
December 31, 2001,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report
on Form 10-K of Cadus Pharmaceutical Corporation.

                                                                 /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                                 ---------------
                                                                     KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
March 28, 2002
Transmittal of Employer’s Annual OMB No. 1545-0714

Information Return of Tip Income and Allocated Tips Form 8027-T

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

 For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see

the Instructions for Form 8027.

Employer’s name Employer identification number

Type or print employer’s

name, address, and

employer identification

number as shown on

Form 941.

Number and street (or P.O. box number, if mail is not delivered to street address.) Number of accompanying Forms 8027

City or town, state, and ZIP code

File Form 8027-T along with accompanying Forms

8027 with the Internal Revenue Service

Cincinnati, OH 45999 by February 28, 2005.

Use Form 8027-T to send Forms 8027 to the

Internal Revenue Service Center if you have more

than one establishment for which you have to file

Form 8027.

Cat. No. 61006A Form 8027-T (2004)

Apt. or suite no.

2004
Opinion issued December 7, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00257-CV

———————————

NECHOL NICKS HENDERSON, Appellant

V.

JME PROPERTIES LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1091517

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Nechol Nicks Henderson, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of 

appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 
2

appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. 

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Caughey.
1250 Capital of Texas Highway South | Three Cielo Center, Suite 601 | Austin, TX 78746 | 512.439.3230 D. Todd Smith

, Shareholder todd@appealsplus.com
Board Certified

— Civil Appellate Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization

April 27, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

T HIRD C OURT OF A PPEALS Price Daniel, Sr. Building 209 W. 14th St., Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701

Re: No. 03

- 13

- 00498

- CV in the Third Court of Appeals, Austin, Texas; Ronnie Lawson & Leah Lawson v. Benjamin Keene, Kristi Keene, Gretchen Gayle Gullekson, Dayna Marie Twyman & KWI

- 8, L.L.C. d/b/a Keller Williams Realty

Dear Mr. Kyle:

This letter acknowledges receipt of your April 23, 2015 notice advising that

the above

- referenced case has been scheduled for oral argument at 1:30 p .m. on May 20, 2015 before a panel consisting of Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

. The undersigned counsel will attend and present argument for the appellee s

.
As always, we appreciate your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Very truly yours,

D. Todd Smith

DTS/s lk

cc: Don Cruse ACCEPTED
03-13-00498-CV

5045082
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
4/27/2015 2:00:01 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2203

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of grants

regarding the prevention and control of sexually transmitted diseases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1993

Mr. WAXMAN (for himself and Mr. TOWNS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of grants regarding the prevention and control

of sexually transmitted diseases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sexually Transmitted

5 Diseases Amendments of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM OF GRANTS REGARDING

7 PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF SEXUALLY

8 TRANSMITTED DISEASES.

9 (a) EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.—Section 318(d)(1) of

10 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c(d)(1)) is
2

•HR 2203 IH

1 amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘there are au2 thorized’’ and all that follows and inserting the following:

3 ‘‘there are authorized to be appropriated $80,000,000 for

4 fiscal year 1994, and such sums as may be necessary for

5 each of the fiscal years 1995 through 1998.’’.

6 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—Section 318 of the

7 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c) is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (b)(3), by striking ‘‘, and’’

9 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

10 (2) in subsection (d)(5)—

11 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking

12 ‘‘form, or’’ and inserting ‘‘form, or’’; and

13 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘pur14 poses,’’ and inserting ‘‘purposes;’’.

15 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM REGARDING PREVENT16 ABLE CASES OF INFERTILITY ARISING AS RE17 SULT OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES.

18 (a) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—

19 (1) AMENDATORY INSTRUCTIONS.—Section 304

20 of Public Law 102–531 (106 Stat. 3490) is amend21 ed—

22 (A) by striking ‘‘Part A of title III’’ and

23 inserting ‘‘Part B of title III’’; and

24 (B) by striking ‘‘241 et seq.’’ and inserting

25 ‘‘243 et seq.’’.
3

•HR 2203 IH

1 (2) CROSS-REFERENCE.—Section 318A of the

2 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c–1), as

3 added by section 304 of Public Law 102–531 (106

4 Stat. 3490), is amended in subsection (o)(2) by

5 striking ‘‘subsection (s)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection

6 (q)’’.

7 (b) EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.—Section 318A of the

8 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247c–1), as added

9 by section 304 of Public Law 102–531 (106 Stat. 3490),

10 is amended—

11 (1) in subsection (q), by striking ‘‘and 1995’’

12 and inserting ‘‘through 1998’’; and

13 (2) in subsection (r)(2), by striking ‘‘through

14 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘through 1998’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 228 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 228

Regarding the tariff classification of motor vehicles for the transport 
                               of goods.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Kildee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Regarding the tariff classification of motor vehicles for the transport 
                               of goods.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trade Equity Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. CLASSIFICATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES FOR THE TRANSPORT OF GOODS.

    The Additional United States Notes to chapter 87 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States are amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following new note:
``3. Any motor vehicle that is--
        ``(a) a light truck within the meaning of section 523.5 of 
        title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on 
        October 1, 1990); or
        ``(b) a light-duty truck within the meaning of such term as 
        defined in section 86.082-2 of title 40 of the Code of Federal 
        Regulations (as in effect July 1, 1990);
shall be classified under heading 8704.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### IN RE JAIME S.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18629.

*David J. Reich,*in support of the petition.

*Howard I Gemeiner,*in opposition.

Decided June 15, 2010

The petition by the respondent father for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 712 (AC 30956), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “In a termination of parental rights proceeding, are the constitutional due process rights of the incarcerated respondent violated if said respondent is not provided with a trial transcript and an opportunity to recall witnesses prior to the conclusion of testimony?”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6995

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DENNIS SCOTT MCCULLOUGH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:06-cr-00389-REP-1)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 13, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Scott McCullough, Appellant Pro Se. Angela MastandreaMiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Scott McCullough appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

McCullough, No. 3:06-cr-00389-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EG01-125-000]

Take notice that the above-referenced notice (66 FR 10278, February 14, 2001) was inadvertently issued under Docket No. EG01-39-000. Since then, it has been reassigned a new docket number as captioned above.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4191  Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M