alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3
	 


	 	 June 16,
2006
	 	 


	Mr. Henry A. Braun

  Senior Vice President

    Flushing Savings Bank

      1979 Marcus Avenue, Suite E140

        Lake Success, NY 11042

Dear Hank:

                As
you know, the Board of Directors has approved your new positions as Senior Vice President of Flushing
Financial Corporation (“FFIC”) and Senior Vice President/Senior Operations Officer of Flushing
Savings Bank, FSB (the “Bank”), effective as of May 15, 2006. 

                Your employment agreements with FFIC and the Bank provide that you have the right to terminate your
employment for “Good Reason” if FFIC or the Bank fail to elect or to reelect you to serve
as Senior Vice President/Operations of the Bank or such other position as you consent to hold, or
if FFIC or the Bank make a material adverse change in your functions, duties, or responsibilities
in your position with FFIC or the Bank.

                Please
sign below to evidence your consent to your new positions as Senior Vice President of FFIC and Senior
Vice President/Senior Operations Officer of the Bank and your agreement that the functions, duties
and responsibilities of your new positions do not represent a material adverse change in the functions,
duties and responsibilities in your position with FFIC and the Bank.

	 


	FLUSHING SAVINGS BANK, FSB	 	FLUSHING FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By: /s/John R. Buran	 	By: /s/Anna M. Piacentini
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Acknowledged And Agreed:	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Henry A. Braun	 	 
	Henry A. Braun	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	June 16, 2006	 	 
	Date
**EXHIBIT 8.1****List of Significant Subsidiaries**The following is a list of the Company’s significant subsidiaries as at March 15, 2008.           **State or** **Proportion of**   **Jurisdiction of** **Ownership** **Name of Significant Subsidiary** **Incorporation** **Interest**              TEEKAY CHARTERING LIMITED MARSHALL ISLANDS  100%TEEKAY HOLDINGS LIMITED MARSHALL ISLANDS  100%SINGLE SHIP LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES MARSHALL ISLANDS  100%TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS LP MARSHALL ISLANDS  64%(1)TEEKAY OFFSHORE PARTNERS LP MARSHALL ISLANDS  60%(1)TEEKAY OFFSHORE OPERATING LP MARSHALL ISLANDS  90%(1)TEEKAY NAVION OFFSHORE LOADING PTE LTD SINGAPORE  90%(1)TEEKAY PETROJARL ASA NORWAY  65%TEEKAY TANKERS LTD MARSHALL ISLANDS  54%(2)   (1) Partnership is controlled by the General Partner. Teekay Corporation has a 100% beneficialownership in the General Partner. In limited cases, approval of a majority or supermajority ofthe common unit holders (in some cases excluding units held by the General Partner and itsaffiliates) is required to approve certain actions. (2) Proportion of voting power held is 53%.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# ACTION:

None.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following Committee meeting:

# DATES:

March 27, 2001 from 8:30 am to 4:05 pm and March 28, 2001 from 8:30 am to 4:25pm.

# ADDRESSES:

National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA), 4301 Wilson Boulevard, Conference Center Room 1, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Veronica Rice, SERDP Program Office, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at (703) 696-2119.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Matters to be Considered: Research and Development proposals and continuing projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program funds in excess of $1M will be reviewed.

This meeting is open to the public.  Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

      ( print page 10277)    
Dated: February 7, 2001.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 01-3725  Filed 2-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard O’Brien PARKER, a/k/a Leonard O’Brien Parris, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-6030.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 22, 2014.

Leonard O’Brien Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leonard O’Brien Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Parker’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Parker has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s orders. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
1

The HONORABLE HOWARD F. SACHS, United States District Judge for

the Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3292

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Daniel F. Ward, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: January 15, 2003

 Filed: January 22, 2003

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Ward pleaded guilty to health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 1347 and 2. After increasing Ward’s base offense level for abusing a position of

public or private trust, the district court1

 imposed a sentence of 5 months

imprisonment and 5 months home detention, 3 years supervised release, and

restitution of $49,944.01. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred

in applying the abuse-of-trust increase.
-2-

The district court did not err. Ward occupied a position of trust--which he

abused--with respect to Medicare, because he was able to defraud Medicare by

certifying that in his professional judgment treatment was medically necessary and

had been provided. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, comment. (n.1); United States v. Hodge,

259 F.3d 549, 556-57 (6th Cir. 2001); United States v. Hoogenboom, 209 F.3d 665,

671 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Rutgard, 116 F.3d 1270, 1293 (9th Cir. 1997).

Further, having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988),

we find no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 10.7.3.     Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association Change in 
                    Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgement 
                    between Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association and
                    Dwight L. Wilson dated July 1, 1997.



               QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                     RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



Name of Participant:             Dwight L. Wilson
                    ---------------------------------------------



The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly 
scheduled meeting on June 19, 1997, the Board of Directors of Quaker City 
Federal Savings and Loan Association acted to renew and extend the Quaker City 
Federal Savings and Loan Association Change in Control Agreement with the 
undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30, 
1999.


Dated this ____1st___ day of _____July _____, A.D., _________ 1997________.


                                       QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
                                       ASSOCIATION



/s/ Dwight L. Wilson                   By: /s/ Frederic R. McGill
-----------------------------             --------------------------------
Participant                               President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF EAT AT JOE'S, LTD. AS OF SEPTEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (10)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (10)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Army announces, that unless there is objection, in fifteen days it will enter into an agreement that would grant Executive license to AZTECH, a non-profit New York corporation with a principal place of business at 2495 Main Street, Suite 418, Buffalo, NY 14214-2152, for U.S. Patent numbers 5,523,742 entitled Motion Sensor, 5,610,590 entitled Motion Sensor, 5,875,309 entitled Personal Motion Event Monitor, and for a United States patent application numbered 09/553,177 entitled Personal Event Monitor with Linear Omnidirectional Response.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. John Moran, Chief, Intellectual Property Law Division, AMSTA-AR-GCL, U.S. Army TACOM-ARDEC, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000, Telephone (973) 724-6590, e-mail: jfmoran@pica.army.mil

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Written objections must be filed within 15 days from publication date of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-4247  Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

692 

KA 11-02029 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TAMMY L. MARVIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (ROBERT TUCKER OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (NEAL P.

MCCLELLAND OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J.

Doran, J.), rendered August 19, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated (two

counts), a class D felony. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her, following

a guilty plea, of two counts of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and

Traffic Law §§ 1192 [2], [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [ii]), defendant contends

that County Court improperly imposed a three-year conditional

discharge in order to impose a one-year ignition interlock period, and

that her double jeopardy rights were violated when the court sentenced

her to a conditional discharge sentence that extends two years beyond

the imposition of the ignition interlock system portion of her

sentence. Defendant failed to preserve those contentions for our

review (see People v Dexter, 104 AD3d 1184, 1184-1185). In any event,

defendant’s contention lacks merit. Penal Law § 65.05 (3) (a)

requires that the period of the conditional discharge in the case of a

felony shall be three years, while Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 (1)

(c) (iii) requires that the ignition interlock device condition shall

be for a period not less than six months but not exceeding the

duration of the conditional discharge, and the court complied with

those statutes (see People v Vidaurrazaga, 100 AD3d 664, 665). 

Entered: July 5, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000912061
<NAME>                        NATURAL HEALTH TRENDS, CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                     434,063
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              152,505
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                847,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,961,751
<PP&E>                                     641,579
<DEPRECIATION>                             74,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             11,253,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      8,416,806
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                5,163,695
<COMMON>                                   7,990
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,387,750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               11,253,899
<SALES>                                    15,269,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           15,269,631
<CGS>                                      4,267,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4,267,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           7,117,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         663,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,557,883)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,557,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                             304,593
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,253,290)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (1.22)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         325,053
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          49,390
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               101,993
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,133,343
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      7,067,467
<ALLOWANCE>                                    110,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,594,324
<DEPOSITS>                                   8,217,154
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,335,006
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             47,986
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           70,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,066
<OTHER-SE>                                     904,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              12,594,324
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                154,471
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               55,777
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               210,248
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              64,976
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,334
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          107,938
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,565
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  18
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                111,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,803
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      22,803
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                     47,041
<LOANS-PAST>                                    24,967
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,150
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               110,561
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,217
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,664
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              110,573
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           110,573
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Ronald PRATI, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 10-610.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Order entered January 11, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00006-CV

IN RE NAZARIO CHAVEZ, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding from the Justice of the Peace 1-1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JT-15M8400H

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this original proceeding for want 

of jurisdiction. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE