alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL ANDREWS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 369 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2378 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2378

To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase the national maximum 
 speed limit on any highway which is located outside an urbanized area 
 with a population of fifty thousand or more, which is constructed to 
  interstate standards, and which is not connected to the Interstate 
                    System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1993

Mr. Lancaster (for himself, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Fingerhut, Mr. Geren, Mr. 
  Minge, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. 
  Solomon, Mrs. Vucanovich, and Mr. Wilson) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to increase the national maximum 
 speed limit on any highway which is located outside an urbanized area 
 with a population of fifty thousand or more, which is constructed to 
  interstate standards, and which is not connected to the Interstate 
                    System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL MAXIMUM SPEED LIMIT.

    Section 154(a)(3)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and connected to a highway on the Interstate System''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTS ON HIGHWAY SAFETY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a study 
of the effects on highway safety of increasing under the amendment made 
by section 1 of this Act the maximum speed limit above fifty-five miles 
per hour on highways with four lanes or more open to traffic.
    (b) Report.--Not later than two years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall transmit 
to Congress a report on the results of the study conducted under this 
section.

                                 <all>
```
[No. 24923-9-III.

Division Three.

September 6, 2007.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare of*A.B. Rogelio Salas, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Social and Health Services, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 04-7-00643-8, Michael E. Schwab, J., entered January 5, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Stephens, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Kulik, J.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MICHAEL JAMES

*Auden Grogins,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Rocco A. Chiarenza,*special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 9, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 382 (AC 29536), is denied.
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-15493, 33-15499, 33-48539, 333-48541, 333-58773, 333-58777, 333-45414, 333-89070 and 333-143284) of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2006, except for the restatement discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (not presented herein), as to which date is August 31, 2006 and except with respect to our opinion on the consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the effects of the change in segments discussed in Note 10, as to which the date is March 26, 2007 relating to the financial statements and our report dated March 30, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

March 31, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4167]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Development Mechanisms; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Development Mechanisms (1141).
    Date and Time: April 18-19, 2001, 8:30 a.m.-6 p.m. and April 20, 
2001, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: NSF, Room 360, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: part-open.
    Contact Persons: Dr. Judith Plesset and Dr. Susan Singer, 
Program Directors, Developmental Mechanism, Division of Integrative 
Biology and Neuroscience, Suite 685, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 292-
8417.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: April 20th, 2001; 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.--
discussion on research trends, opportunities and assessment 
procedures in Integrative Biology and Neuroscience with Dr. Mary 
Clutter, Assistant Director, Directorate for Biological Sciences.
    Closed Session: April 18th, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.; April 
19th, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.; April 20th. 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 10 
and 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. To review and evaluate the Development 
Mechanisms proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 14, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-4167 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-04589, 333-92597, 333-34596, and 333-43002 on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement Nos. 333-59107, 333-63663, 333-72833, 333-80615, 333-89669, 333-89687,
333-42184, and 333-47518 on Form S-3 of StarBase Corporation of our report dated
May 7, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Starbase Corporation
for the year ended March 31, 2001.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
June 28, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         235,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,174
<INVENTORY>                                     35,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               297,174
<PP&E>                                         308,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                 120,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 532,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,174
<BONDS>                                        956,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           646
<OTHER-SE>                                   (793,031)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   532,816
<SALES>                                        919,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               919,657
<CGS>                                          507,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (102,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       422
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (103,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 155,514
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,714)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard BOULDIN, also known as Waco, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-11338

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 2014.

Richard Bouldin, Bastrop, TX, pro se.

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The guilty plea conviction of Richard Bouldin, federal prisoner # 32154-177, for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) was final in 2008. In October 2013, at a time when Bouldin had no actions pending, he filed a pro se motion requesting grand jury documents and a pro se motion titled “Order to Show Cause,” requesting that the district court order the United States Attorney to show cause why the documents requested by Bouldin should not be provided. Bouldin appeals the district court’s denial of those motions and the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of those motions.

It is questionable whether Bouldin’s motions had a valid jurisdictional basis in the district court. *See United States v. Carvajal,*989 F.2d 170, 170 (5th Cir.1993). However, even if the district court correctly exercised jurisdiction, the district court properly denied the motions because Boul-din failed to show a particularized need for the grand jury materials. *See United States v. Miramontez,*995 F.2d 56, 57-58 (5th Cir.1993). Further, by pleading guilty, he waived all nonjurisdictional defects occurring during the grand jury proceedings. *Id.*at 60. Accordingly, the denial of Bouldin’s postconviction motions is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
2009-1308.

#### State v. Lake.

Columbiana App. No. 08 CO 26, 2009-Ohio-3057.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at December  31, 1996 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000912356
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              15,490
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                           345
<INVENTORY>                                          1,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20,584
<PP&E>                                             201,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                      28,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     223,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,892
<BONDS>                                            181,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               16,430
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                29
<OTHER-SE>                                           6,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       223,718
<SALES>                                            161,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   174,234
<CGS>                                               65,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       65,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    69,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       194
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                            69
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .15



</TABLE>
Exhibit 11.1

                              SYMBOLLON CORPORATION

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                 The Years Ended December 31,
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                1996                  1995
                                           --------------        --------------


         Net Loss ......................   $    (905,415)        $  (1,373,711)

         Preferred Stock Dividend.......         (15,233)
                                           --------------        --------------
         Net Loss on  Per Share Basis...   $    (920,648)        $  (1,373,711)
                                           ==============        ==============


         Primary loss per share:
           Weighted average common shares
           outstanding..................       2,481,796             2,434,019


           Shares subject to restriction.       (700,000)             (700,000)
                                           --------------        --------------
                                               1,781,796             1,734,019
                                           ==============        ==============


         Loss per share (1):.............  $       (0.52)        $       (0.79)
                                           ==============        ==============



    (1) There is no difference between primary and fully diluted loss per share.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


May 12, 2004


/s/ CHARLES SHEFFIELD
Charles Sheffield
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ E.A. BUCHHOLTZ
E.A. Buchholtz
Chief Financial Officer


SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report on Form 10-QSB to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.


SPECTRASOURCE CORPORATION

By: /s/ CHARLES SHEFFIELD
    ----------------------------------
    Charles Sheffield, Chief Executive Officer,
    President and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                    3,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            68,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              3,000
<INVENTORY>                                             109,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        180,000
<PP&E>                                                1,009,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          386,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          803,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                11,953,000
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                              4,984,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (16,134,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            803,000
<SALES>                                                 139,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        139,000
<CGS>                                                    96,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            96,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      166,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,092,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,092,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,092,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.02)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2313 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2313

      To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on anthraquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1993

 Mr. Hastert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on anthraquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHRAQUINONE.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

       ``  9902.31.12  9,10-Anthracenedione (CAS No. 84-65-1) (provided for in                     No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        subheading 2914.61.00)..................................  Free                                                31/94           ''

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by section 1 applies with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which the 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act;
and with respect to which there would have been no duty or a lower duty 
if the amendment made by section 1 had applied to such entry or 
withdrawal, shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or 
withdrawal had occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549




FORM
10-Q/A






(Mark
      One)x
            QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934




For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006




o
            TRANSITION
      REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT





For the
transition period from ___________ to ___________





Commission
file number 000-17746


Safe
Technologies International, Inc.
 (Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
  Delaware
              
              22-2824492(State or other
      jurisdiction of
              
              (IRS
    Employerincorporation or
      organization)
              
              Identification
      No.)
   1200
      N Federal Highway, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33432(Address of
      principal executive offices)
   (866)
      297-5070(Issuer's
      telephone number)__________________________________
                (Former
      address, if changed since last report)
   Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No o
 
 Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x
 
 State the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity,
as of the latest practicable date: 275,275,128 shares as of November 9,
2009.
 
 Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes o No x
 
 
 
 Explanatory
Note:
 
 Our
Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, erroneously
reported the Company to be a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act.  This error was repeated in each of our
subsequent filings on Form 10Q.  Therefore, we are amending each of
our erroneous filings to indicate that the Company is not, and was not, a shell
company.
 
 ITEM
6. EXHIBITS.
 
 31.1  Certification
of principal executive officer
 
 31.2  Certification
of principal financial officer
 
 32    Section
1350 Certification
 
 
 SIGNATURES
 
 In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
 
  Safe
      Technologies International, Inc.
                  (Registrant)Date:
      November 23, 2009
                By:
                /s/Christopher
      L. KolbChristopher
      L. Kolb, President