alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2179

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing suspension of duty

on anthraquinone.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. RAVENEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing

suspension of duty on anthraquinone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ANTHRAQUINONE.

4 Heading 9902.30.17 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ‘‘12/

6 31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

9 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

10 enactment of this Act.
2

•HR 2179 IH

1 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

3 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro4 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

6 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend7 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

8 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

9 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en10 actment of this Act;

11 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

12 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

13 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

14 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

15 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2142

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the child and

dependent care credit to nonmarried individuals who are full-time students.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1993

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself and Mrs. MINK) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

child and dependent care credit to nonmarried individuals

who are full-time students.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) subsection (d) of section 21 of the Internal Reve4 nue Code of 1986 (relating to earned income limitation)

5 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

6 paragraph:

7 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR NONMARRIED INDIVID8 UAL WHO IS A STUDENT.—In the case of an individ9 ual who is not married at the close of the taxable

10 year and who is a student, for purposes of sub-
2

•HR 2142 IH

1 section (b)(2) and paragraph (1) of this subsection,

2 such individual shall be deemed for each month dur3 ing which such individual is a full-time student at an

4 educational institution to be gainfully employed and

5 to have earned income of not less than—

6 ‘‘(A) $200 if subsection (c)(1) applies for

7 the taxable year, or

8 ‘‘(B) $400 if subsection (c)(2) applies for

9 the taxable year.’’

10 (b) The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall

11 apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2180

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing suspension of duty

on Paramine Acid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. RAVENEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1996, the previously existing

suspension of duty on Paramine Acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PARAMINE ACID.

4 Heading 9902.30.44 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

6 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

7 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

9 1 shall take effect on the 15th day after the date of the

10 enactment of this Act.
2

•HR 2180 IH

1 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

3 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro4 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

6 warehouse for consumption of goods to which the amend7 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

8 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

9 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en10 actment of this Act;

11 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

12 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

13 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

14 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had

15 occurred on such 15th day.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EG01-128-000]


PPL Susquehanna, LLC; Errata Notice; Notice of Application for 
Commission Redetermination of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

February 14, 2001
    Take notice that the above-referenced notice (66 FR 10278, February 
14, 2001) was inadvertently issued under Docket No. EG01-43-000. Since 
then, it has been reasigned a new docket number as captioned above.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4194 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 
 Name
    
    CountryNHT Global, Inc. [fka Lexxus International, Inc.]
    
    United States (Delaware)MarketVision Communications Corp.
    
    United States (Delaware)NHTC International, LLC
    
    United States (Delaware)NHTC Nominee Holdings, LLC
    
    United States (Delaware)NHT Australia Pty. Ltd. [ fka Lexxus International (SW Pacific) Pty. Ltd.]
    
    AustraliaNHTC Canada Holdings Pty. Limited
    
    AustraliaNHT Global (Canada) Company [fka Lexxus International (Canada) Company]
    
    CanadaNHTC Holding Company
    
    Cayman IslandsNHT Global Taiwan Company
    
    Cayman IslandsNHTC Trading Company
    
    Cayman IslandsNHT Global (China) Corporation [fka Lexxus International (China) Co., Ltd.]
    
    ChinaNHT Global Hong Kong Limited [fka Lexxus International Co., Ltd.]
    
    Hong KongPT NHT Global Indonesia [fkaPT Lexxus Indonesia]
    
    IndonesiaNatural Health Trends Japan, Inc.
    
    JapanLXK, Ltd.
    
    KoreaNHTC Macau Company Limited
    
    MacauNatural Health Trends Global SDN. BHD. [fka LXXS Marketing Sdn. Bhd.]
    
    MalaysiaDistribuidora NHTC de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoImportadora NHTC de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoServicios NHTC de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoNHT New Zealand Limited [fka Lexxus International (NZ) Limited]
    
    New ZealandNHT Global Philippines, Inc. [fka Lexxus International Network Marketing, Inc.]
    
    PhilippinesNHTC Puerto Rico LLC
    
    Puerto RicoNHT Global Singapore PTE. LTD. [fka Lexxus Marketing Pte. Ltd.]
    
    SingaporeNHT Slovenia, Ltd.
    
    SloveniaNHT Global (Thailand) Ltd.
    
    Thailand
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID MICHAEL MURR,

 Petitioner - Appellee,

 v.

JOHN MARSHALL, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellant.

No. 09-56960

D.C. No. 5:04-cv-01380-TJHMAN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Terry J. Hatter, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2010

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON, CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Warden John Marshall appeals from the district court’s grant of the petition

for habeas corpus of David Michael Murr. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent

decision in Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S.Ct. 859 (2011), we hold that Murr’s federal

right to due process was not violated. Murr “was allowed an opportunity to be

FILED

APR 13 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
heard and was provided a statement of the reasons why parole was denied.” Id. at

862. Thus, Murr is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus.

Murr argues that Cooke did not address whether the Constitution requires a

showing of some evidence of future danger before states can deny parole. This

argument has been rejected by our precedent. See Pearson v. Muntz, --- F.3d ----,

2011 WL 1238007, at *5 (9th Cir. 2011). Murr also argues that the Governor

violated his due process rights by not granting Murr a hearing before reversing his

grant of parole. This argument was raised for the first time in a letter filed

pursuant to Rule 28(j) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. It was thus

made too late, and is not properly before us. See id. at *5 n.5. 

REVERSED.
let a2aTabHandlerCalled = false;
const a2aToggleConfig = { attributes: true };

// Manages tabbing 
function a2aTabHandler() {
  if (!a2aTabHandlerCalled) {
    let shareButton = document.getElementById('a2a-share__button');
    let linkContainer = document.getElementById('a2apage_mini_services');

    linkContainer.firstChild.addEventListener('keydown', function(event) {
      if(event.shiftKey && event.keyCode == 9) { 
        document.getElementById('a2apage_dropdown').style.display = 'none';
        shareButton.focus();
        event.preventDefault();
        event.stopPropagation();
      }
    });

    linkContainer.lastChild.addEventListener('keydown', function(event) {
      if (event.keyCode == 9) {
        document.getElementById('a2apage_dropdown').style.display = 'none';
        shareButton.focus();
        event.preventDefault();
        event.stopPropagation();
      }
    });

    a2aTabHandlerCalled = true;
  }
}

// Observes changes in the AddToAny menu's display style to change the button label.
function a2aToggleHandler(mutationList, observer) {
  for (const mutation of mutationList) {
    if (mutation.attributeName === 'style') {
      let shareButton = document.getElementById('a2a-share__button');
      let displayState = mutation.target.style.display;
      if (displayState === 'none') {
        shareButton.innerText = "Share +";
      } else {
        shareButton.innerText = "X";
      }
    }


  }
}

const a2aToggleObserver = new MutationObserver(a2aToggleHandler);

// Checks to see if the AddToAny menu has been added to the DOM then observes the toggle.
function a2aLoadHandler(mutationList, observer) {
  for (const mutation of mutationList) {
    if (mutation.type === "childList") {
      for (const node of mutation.addedNodes) {
        if (node.id === "a2apage_dropdown") {
          a2aToggleObserver.observe(node, a2aToggleConfig);
        }
        
        let linkContainer = document.getElementById('a2apage_mini_services');
        if (linkContainer != null) {
          if (linkContainer.childNodes.length === 4) {
            a2aTabHandler();
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

const a2aLoadObserver = new MutationObserver(a2aLoadHandler);
const a2aLoadConfig = { childList: true, subtree: true };
a2aLoadObserver.observe(document.body, a2aLoadConfig);
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Of Uni-Marts, Inc.
State College, Pennsylvania

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-69136, No. 33-9807, No. 333-07697, No. 333-75107, and No. 333-24903 of
Uni-Marts, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated December 16, 2003, appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uni-Marts, Inc. for the year ended September
30, 2003.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule of Uni-Marts, Inc., listed in Item 15(A)(2). This consolidated
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Uni-Marts, Inc.'s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

December 19, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-760
In Re: ELDON LOWELL YOCUM, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eldon Lowell Yocum, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although this court has, on occasion, transferred similar actions to the appropriate district court, the obtuse nature of Yocum's application prevents any degree of certainty regarding which court that might be. 2 PER CURIAM: Eldon Lowell Yocum, a federal prisoner, has filed in this court an original petition for habeas corpus relief and a motion to institute criminal proceedings against numerous individuals. See 28U.S.C. § 2255 (1994). This court's jurisdiction over original actions for habeas corpus relief is significantly circumscribed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (1994). As a result, we must dismiss this action. Yocum's application is fatally flawed on several fronts. Theapplication is not verified and fails to identify with any specificity the conviction and sentence of which Yocum challenges the validity. * A significant portion of the relief Yocum appears to be seeking is the production of documents from various courts around the country and is more appropriately sought in another forum. Moreover, this court may only entertain such an application where the document states the reason for failing to file the application in the district court of the district in which he is in custody. See id. Yocum baldly asserts that the district court is biased. This assertion, without more, is not a sufficient reason for failing to pursue this application in the most appropriate forum. Because of the numerous deficiencies in Yocum's application, we dismiss this attempt at habeas corpus relief.3 Yocum's motion to "Charge Extortion" is denied because this court does not institute criminal prosecutions. In light of our dismissal of Yocum's petition, we deny both motions for release. We deny the motions to file a civil complaint in this court and to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 208 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 208

     To prohibit candidates for Federal office from using campaign 
            contributions for inherently personal purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit candidates for Federal office from using campaign 
            contributions for inherently personal purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INHERENTLY PERSONAL 
              PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end of the 
following new section:

 ``prohibition of use of contributions for inherently personal purposes

    ``Sec. 324. (a) An individual who receives contributions as a 
candidate for Federal office--
            ``(1) may use such contributions only for legitimate and 
        verifiable campaign expenses; and
            ``(2) may not use such contributions for any inherently 
        personal purpose.
    ``(b) As used in this subsection--
            ``(1) the term `campaign expenses' means expenses 
        attributable solely to bona fide campaign purposes; and
            ``(2) the term `inherently personal purpose' means a 
        purpose that, by its nature, is for personal benefit, and such 
        term includes a home mortgage payment, clothing purchase, 
        noncampaign automobile expense, and any other inherently 
        personal living expense.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to contributions received after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3735 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3735

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide electronic filing 
   receipts to taxpayers who file tax returns via electronic filing 
                    process, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2021

   Mr. Vela introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide electronic filing 
   receipts to taxpayers who file tax returns via electronic filing 
                    process, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``E-Filing Standards Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AMENDED TO INCLUDE RECEIPTS, 
              REJECTION EXPLANATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6011(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) The Secretary shall promote the use of electronically 
        filed returns by requiring that all taxpayers submitting 
        returns of tax via electronic filing process shall be issued an 
        e-filing receipt via the taxpayer's chosen method of 
        correspondence which shall indicate the acceptance or rejection 
        of a return, and if such return is rejected--
                    ``(A) such receipt shall provide information about 
                the steps necessary to resolve the issue causing such 
                rejection,
                    ``(B) the taxpayer shall be allowed 15 business 
                days to correct and re-submit such return, and
                    ``(C) if such return is not re-submitted within 15 
                business days, such return shall be treated as a paper 
                return.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 6651 of such Code is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(k) Treatment of returns granted extension or treated as 
        paper returns under section 6011(f).--In the case of a return 
        granted a 15 business day extension or treated as a paper 
        return under section 6011(f), such return shall be treated as 
        timely filed by the taxpayer and not subject to the addition to 
        the tax under subsection (a).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to returns of tax submitted filing via electronic filing process 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Mandatory Training by Quarter for All Employees (FY2024)

* Employees are also required to attend 1 General Skills Training Workshop and can choose amongst 4 different

topics

Mandatory Training by Quarter for Supervisors (FY2024)

Quarter 1

▪ Ethics

Quarter 2

▪ Emergency & Disaster Preparedness

▪ Diversity & Inclusion

Quarter 3

▪ Records Management

▪ Privacy Awareness

Quarter 4

▪ Human Trafficking Awareness

▪ CUI

Quarter 1 

▪ Ongoing Supervisory Training 

Quarter 2

▪ Responding to violations of whistleblower protections

▪ Ongoing Supervisory Training

Quarter 3

▪ New Supervisors Training 

▪ Employing Individuals with Disabilities 

▪ Ongoing Supervisory Training

Quarter 4

▪ Veteran Employment

▪ Ongoing Supervisory Training
FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 2, 2022

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

ANNOUNCES PLANNED DOWN TIME FOR RECORDKEEPER TRANSITION

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) has announced

planned Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) down time to allow for a transition to its new recordkeeper. 

During the transition period, participants’ funds will remain invested in the TSP funds that were 

elected. The transition period begins on May 16, 2022 and ends the first week of June. Toward 

the end of the transition period, the FRTIB will suspend all TSP transactions for several days 

beginning on May 26, 2022. Access to My Account and the ThriftLine will be suspended during 

this time in order to add new features to enhance the ways participants manage their TSP 

account.

The FRTIB encourages TSP participants to consider whether this transition period will affect 

their retirement planning, especially if they are planning to request any transactions during May 

of 2022. While current TSP investments will remain active during this transition period, the 

FRTIB will need to temporarily suspend investment changes toward the end of the transition 

period, beginning May 26. TSP participants will not be able to change their investment choices 

during this brief time. TSP participants should review their current investment choices and make 

sure they still align with individual retirement goals. 

Planned down time for each transaction type varies; information about the transition and the new 

features that will be available to TSP participants can be found at: https://www.tsp.gov/new-tspfeatures/?utm_source=website&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=getexcited1

The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) is a retirement savings plan for Federal 

employees; it is similar to the 401(k) plans offered by many private 

employers. As of March 2022, TSP assets totaled approximately $782.2

billion, and retirement savings accounts were being maintained for more than

6.5 million participants TSP participants. Participants include Federal 

civilian employees in all branches of Government, employees of the U.S. 

Postal Service, and members of the uniformed services. Additional information 

can be found at www.tsp.gov. 

MEDIA CONTACT:

Kim Weaver 

202-942-1641

(end)