alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2206

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer public lands for the

purposes of providing affordable housing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1993

Mr. BILBRAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer public

lands for the purposes of providing affordable housing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS FOR AFFORD4 ABLE HOUSING.

5 (a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding section

6 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of

7 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1713), the Secretary of the Interior is

8 authorized to transfer to a public housing agency (as such

9 term is defined in section 3(b) of the United States Hous10 ing Act of 1937) all right, title, and interest of the United
2

•HR 2206 IH

1 States in and to public lands for the purpose of providing

2 affordable housing. Lands may be transferred under this

3 subsection for less than fair market value or without con4 sideration.

5 (b) AFFORDABLE HOUSING.—Housing shall be con6 sidered affordable housing for purposes of this Act if the

7 housing—

8 (1) complies with the requirements under sec9 tion 215 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Afford10 able Housing Act or is assisted under title II of such

11 Act;

12 (2) is assisted under the United States Housing

13 Act of 1937;

14 (3) is assisted under section 202 of the Housing

15 Act of 1959; or

16 (4) is assisted under title V of the Housing Act

17 of 1949.

18 (c) REVERSION.—Any lands transferred pursuant to

19 this section which cease to be used for the housing pur20 poses described in subsection (b) shall revert to the United

21 States and shall be administered by the Secretary as part

22 of the public lands.

23 (d) PUBLIC LANDS.—For the purposes of this sec24 tion, the term ‘‘public lands’’ means the lands adminis25 tered by the Bureau of Land Management, except for
3

•HR 2206 IH

1 those lands within an environmentally sensitive area, the

2 national wilderness preservation system, the national wild

3 and scenic rivers system, or the national trails system.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Public notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        At the request of segments of the filming community for more time to prepare comments, the National Park Service is extending the deadline for comments on the Public Notice Request for Comments on the draft fee schedules associated with Filming and Photography Location Fees published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 14, 2000, (65 FR 78186). The original notice established February 12, 2001, as the public comment deadline. That ending date for which comments will be accepted is now extended to March 2, 2001.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Comments should be addressed to: Dick Young, Special Park Uses Program Manager, C/O Colonial NHP, P. O. Box 210, Yorktown, VA 23690, or via email at: Dick_S._Young@nps.gov. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dick Young at (757) 898-7846, or (757) 898-2426. 

Dated: February 16, 2001.

Dennis Burnett,

Acting Chief, Ranger Activities Division.

[FR Doc. 01-4556 Filed 2-23-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERREQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b) |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| I, David Loflin, Acting Chief Accounting Officer of Diamond I,                Inc.                (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted                pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the                accompanying report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,                2007, and                filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof                (the                “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I further certify that                the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: August 20, 2007. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN |   |
|-------------------------|------------------|--------|

|   | David LoflinActing Chief Accounting Officer |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
[No. 35293-1-II.

Division Two.

August 14, 2007.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Denise Rae Griffith, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 05-1-00746-4, Scott E. Blinks, J. Pro Tern., entered August 23, 2006. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and *Hunt, JJ.*
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Investors Income Properties (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: August 13, 2008  
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: August 13, 2008  





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Safe Aid
Products Incorporated financial statements for the nine months ended August 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,119
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,055
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,119
<SALES>                                          9,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,801
<CGS>                                            7,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,246)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,246)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Lourdes M. GARCIA, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.

No. 2007-3144.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 6, 2007.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

*997ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Exhibit 21

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


<PAGE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                                                             Percent      State of
                                                                                of      Incorporation
Parent                           Subsidiary                                 Ownership  or Organization
-------------------------------  ------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------------
<S>                              <C>                                        <C>        <C>

WesterFed Financial Corporation  Western Security Bank                        100%         Federal
Western Security Bank            Monte Mac I                                  100%         Montana
Western Security Bank            Western Security Investment Services, Inc.   100%         Montana
Western Security Bank            Service Corporation of Montana               100%         Montana

</TABLE>
#### Patrick Bertram WALKER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent—Appellee, and State of South Carolina, Respondent.

No. 10-7404.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.

Decided: Jan. 4, 2011.

Patrick Bertram Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Bertram Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### ERNST & YOUNG, et al., petitioners, v. BANKRUPTCY SERVICES, INC.

No. 08-1042.

April 20, 2009.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2489 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2489

 To confer jurisdiction on the United States Claims Court with respect 
            to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1993

 Mr. Skeen (for himself and Mr. Schiff) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To confer jurisdiction on the United States Claims Court with respect 
            to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION.

    Notwithstanding sections 2401 and 2501 of title 28, United States 
Code, and section 12 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1052), or 
any other law which would interprose or support a defense of 
untimeliness, jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the United States 
Claims Court to hear, determine, and render judgment on any claim by 
Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico against the United States 
with respect to any lands or interests therein the State of New Mexico 
or any adjoining State held by aboriginal title or otherwise which were 
acquired from the tribe without payment of adequate compensation by the 
United States. As a matter of adequate compensation, the United States 
Claims Court may award interest at a rate of 5 percent per year to 
accrue from the date on which such lands or interests therein were 
acquired from the tribe by the United States. Such jurisdiction is 
conferred only with respect to claims accruing on or before August 13, 
1946, and all such claims must be filed within three years after the 
date of enactment of this Act. Such jurisdiction is conferred 
notwithstanding any failure of the tribe to exhaust any available 
administrative remedy.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT APPLICABLE.

    Any award made to any Indian tribe other than the Pueblo of Isleta 
Indian Tribe of New Mexico before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, under any judgment of the Indian Claims 
Commission or any other authority, with respect to any lands that are 
the subject of a claim submitted by the tribe under section 1 shall not 
be considered a defense, estoppel, or set-off to such claim, and shall 
not otherwise affect the entitlement to, or amount of, any relief with 
respect to such claim.

                                 <all>
```
#### IN RE JAZMINE B.

*Michael S. Taylor,*in support of the petition.

*Susan T. Pearlman,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided July 8, 2010

The petition by the respondent father for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 376 (AC 30390), is denied.
**EXHIBIT23.2**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.333-72508, 333-95765, 333-37641, 033-85766 and 333-117407of Micro Component Technology, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form S-8and Registration Statement Nos. 333-124762, 333-104590, 333-108072and 333-115125 on Form S-2, and Registration Statement No.333-133276 on Form S-1 of our report on the Company’s 2005 and 2004 financialstatements dated February 3, 2006, (except for Note 12, as to which the date isFebruary 17, 2006), which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a goingconcern, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Micro ComponentTechnology, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.
| /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| Minneapolis, MN                        |
| March 30, 2007                         |

 

----
#### Saeed Mohammed Saleh HATIM, Detainee, Camp Delta, et al., Appellees v. Robert M. GATES, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, et al., Appellants.

No. 10-5048.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 9, 2010.

Decided Feb. 15, 2011.

*721Sharon Swingle, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellants. With her on the briefs were Ian Heath Gershengorn, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and Robert M. Loeb, Attorney.

Brian E. Foster argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were S. William Livingston, Alan A. Pemberton, and David H. Remes. Mare D. Falkoff entered an appearance.

Before: HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

Saeed Mohammed Saleh Hatim, a Yemeni national, is a prisoner at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. The district court granted Hatim’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus in December 2009. *Hatim v. Obama,*677 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C.2009). After the district court entered its order, this court issued decisions inconsistent with several of the district court’s legal premises. We see no useful purpose in reciting the evidence. The order granting the writ must be vacated and the case remanded. The district court candidly acknowledged as much when it issued a stay of its order pending this appeal.

The district court ruled that the military could detain only individuals who were “part of’ al-Qaida or the Taliban; and that Hatim did not fit that description. That ruling is directly contrary to *Al-Bihani v. Obama,*which held that “those who purposefully and materially support” al-Qaida or the Taliban could also be detained. 590 F.3d 866, 872 (D.C.Cir.2010). Hatim admits the error, but says it was harmless. We cannot see how. As the district court stated in issuing the stay, *Al-Bihani*“calls into question” a “key determination ]” upon which the order rested.

The district court also ruled that in order to detain Hatim the government had to prove that he was part of the “command structure” of al-Qaida or the Taliban. Our intervening decisions in *Bensayah v. Obama,*610 F.3d 718, 725 (D.C.Cir.2010), and *Awad v. Obama,*608 F.3d 1, 11 (D.C.Cir. 2010), held that although it is sufficient to show that an individual is in the command structure, such a showing is not necessary in order to defeat a habeas petition.

In addition, the district court appeared to evaluate the evidence on the basis of an approach we have since rejected in *Al-Adahi v. Obama,*613 F.3d 1102, 1105-06 (D.C.Cir.2010), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1001, 178 L.Ed.2d 855 (2011). *See also Salahi v. Obama,*625 F.3d 745, 753 (D.C.Cir.2010).

In light of these legal developments occurring after the district court issued its order, the government and Hatim should have the opportunity on remand to present additional evidence.

*Vacated and remanded.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 

66 FR 10503, February 15, 2001.

# Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 

2 a.m., Wednesday, February 28, 2001.

# Cancellation of the Meeting: 

                        Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Board of Directors meeting scheduled for February 28, 2001.                              ( print page 11170)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the Board, (202) 408-2837.

James L. Bothwell,

Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 01-4476 Filed 2-20-01; 10:23 am]

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P