alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 DEKANIA CORP. 
                     , 2006 
 Cohen
Brothers, LLC 
 450 Park Avenue 
 New York, New York 10022

 Gentlemen: 
 This letter will confirm our
agreement, that commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement of the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Dekania Corp. (“Company”) and continuing until the
consummation by the Company of a “Business Combination” (as described in the prospectus) or upon the Company’s dissolution, Cohen Brothers, LLC (“Cohen Brothers”) shall make available to the Company certain administrative,
technology and secretarial services, as well as the use of certain limited office space, including a conference room, in Philadelphia, as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 2929 Arch Street, Suite 1703, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19104 (or any successor location). In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay to Cohen Brothers the sum of $7,500 per month (the “Fee”) on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	DEKANIA CORP.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	Thomas Friedberg
	Title:	 	President


  

			
	Agreed to and Accepted by:
	
	COHEN BROTHERS, LLC
		
	 By:
	 	  

	Name:	 	Daniel G. Cohen
	Title:	 	Chairman
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                           NATURAL HEALTH TRENDS CORP.
                               STOCK OPTION GRANT

                               Option to Purchase

                             6,000,000 COMMON SHARES

                                  Presented To:

                            Capital Development S.A.
                              6, Bvd Georges-Favon
                                Case postale 5726
                                CH - 1211 Geneva 11

                                   Key Dates:
            July 24, 2002 - 2,000,000 options vest at $.01 per share
            July 24, 2003 - 2,000,000 options vest at $.015 per share
            July 24, 2004 - 2,000,000 options vest at $.02 per share
                        July 24, 2007 - Expiration Date

You may exercise your right to purchase all or any of the shares on or after the
date on which such shares vest, but in any event, not later than the Expiration
Date. Your exercise shall be effective when payment in full for the shares being
purchased is actually received by the Company. The Company shall not be
obligated to deliver any stock certificates unless and until there has been
compliance with all requirements the Company may deem applicable. No exercise
may occur after the Expiration Date. This option and all rights provided for
herein shall be of no force or effect and no rights hereunder shall exist after
the Expiration Date.

/s/ Mark D. Woodburn
----------------------
Mark D. Woodburn
President
July 24, 2002

           This is not a stock certificate or a negotiable instrument
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. J. Santos FELIX-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Santos Felix-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50260

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 7, 2014.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*254Philip J. Lynch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, Donna F. Col-tharp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SOUTHWTCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

J. Santos Felix-Hernandez (Felix) was convicted of being an alien found in the United' States without permission after having been previously deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; he was sentenced to six months in prison and two years of non-reporting supervised release. On appeal, Felix challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment. He contends that he cannot be “found in” the United States because he had voluntarily presented himself for immigration inspection when he entered the southbound exit lane at the port of entry.

“A challenge to an indictment based on the legal sufficiency of uncontested facts is an issue of law reviewed de novo.” *United States v. Flores,*404 F.3d 320, 326 (5th Cir.2005). To prove Felix’s offense of conviction, the Government was required to establish four elements: (1) alienage, (2) arrest and deportation, (3) unlawful presence in the United States, and (4) lack of the Attorney General’s consent to reenter. *United States v. Flores-Peraza,*58 F.3d 164, 166 (5th Cir.1995).

Felix stipulated to the facts necessary to prove these elements, namely, that he was a citizen of Mexico, he was previously deported, he was “in the United States” when he was stopped (encountered) by the immigration officer, and he did not receive permission to renter the United States. *See Flores-Peraza,*58 F.3d at 166; *see United States v. Ramos-Flores,*233 Fed.Appx. 347, 348, 350 (5th Cir.2007). His reliance upon *United States v. Angeles-Mascote,*206 F.3d 529 (5th Cir.2000), and *United States v. Canals-Jimenez,*943 F.2d 1284 (11th Cir.1991), is misplaced. In those cases, the alien defendants were attempting to *enter*the United States through a port of entry. Here, Felix had already illegally entered the United States without detection and was attempting to *exit*the United States through a port of entry.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1934 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 48

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1934

                          [Report No. 103-93]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for the Federal 
              Maritime Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 17, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                  Union Calendar No. 48
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1934

                          [Report No. 103-93]

   To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for the Federal 
              Maritime Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1993

  Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Studds, Mr. Fields of Texas, and Mr. 
   Bateman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

                              May 17, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for the Federal 
              Maritime Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Maritime Commission 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Federal Maritime 
Commission $19,450,000 for fiscal year 1994.

SEC. 3. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR NONPERFORMANCE OF VOYAGES.

    Section 3(b) of Public Law 89-777 (46 App. U.S.C. 817e(b)) is 
amended by striking ``and such bond or other security shall be in an 
amount paid equal to the estimated total revenue for the particular 
transportation.'' and inserting a period.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of County Bank Corp on form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Curt Carter, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The Information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Curt Carter
-------------------------------------
Curt Carter
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2005
#### Gurbinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-71751.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2014.*

Filed April 11, 2014.

Garish Sarin, Esquire, Law Offices of Garish Sarin, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Lauren Fascett, OIL, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable, for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gurbinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider the BIA’s prior order of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of motions to reconsider or to reopen. *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reconsider be*492cause Singh failed to specify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s previous decision. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1). Further, in construing Singh’s motion as a motion to reopen, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion because Singh failed to support it with new, previously unavailable evidence. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1); *see also Lainez-Ortiz v. INS,*96 F.3d 393, 396 (9th Cir.1996). We reject Singh’s contentions that the BIA ignored evidence, applied an incorrect legal standard, or otherwise improperly analyzed his motion.

Finally, we lack jurisdiction to consider any contentions by Singh challenging the BIA’s December 21, 2011 order because the petition for review is untimely as to that order. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); *see also Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 405-06, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995);

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 218

To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension of duty on chemical

intermediate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend until January 1, 1996, the existing suspension

of duty on chemical intermediate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON CHEMICAL INTERMEDIATE.

5 Heading 9902.30.96 of the Harmonized Tariff

6 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

7 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

8 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

9 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re10 spect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for
2

•HR 218 IH

1 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

2 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
|  | *Caring for the Landand Serving the People* |
|--|----------------------------------------------|

# Forest Service Directives

*The Forest Service Directive System consists of the Forest ServiceManual and Handbooks, which codify the agency's policy, practice, andprocedure. The system serves as the primary basis for the internal managementand control of all programs and the primary source of administrative directionto Forest Service employees.*

*To assist users, Service-wide issuances and field issuances are displayed for each Forest Service Manual title and Handbook.  Service-wide issuances appear first and are followed by Regional Office issuances, Forest issuances for that Region, and so forth. Only those units that have issued directives to a specific FSM title or FSH will appear in the listing.*

----

Overview of Forest Service Directive System

**Forest Service Manuals (FSM)**

- Service-wide Issuances
- Field Issuances
- ALL Issuances (Service-wide and Field Issuances)

**Forest Service Handbooks (FSH)**- Service-wide Issuances 
- Field Issuances
- ALL Issuances (Service-wide and Field Issuances)

**Other Information**

Service-wide User Aids

----

**
[Forest Service Home Page]  [Legal Information and Disclaimers]
**
SM.FS.woDirectives@usda.gov
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Symbollon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Framingham, Massachusetts


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 and S-3 of
our report dated February 21, 2002 relating to the financial statements of
Symbollon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a development stage company) as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the years then ended, and amounts for the
period from inception (July 15, 1986) to December 31, 2001 (not presented
separately) appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2001.




/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2002
Exhibit 10.7.8





Quaker City
Bank Change in Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment between Quaker City Bank and Dwight L. Wilson dated July 1, 2002.





QUAKER CITY BANK


CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


RENEWAL AND
EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT





Name of Participant:    Dwight L. Wilson





The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly scheduled meeting on June 25, 2002, the Board of Directors of Quaker City Bank acted to renew and extend the Quaker City
Bank Change in Control Agreement with the undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30, 2004.





Dated this
            1st             day of
            July            , A.D.,
            2002            .





QUAKER CITY BANK/s/    DWIGHT L. WILSON



By:

/s/    FREDERIC R. MCGILLParticipant





President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of suspension of “PHS Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research.”

# SUMMARY:

                        On December 7, 2000, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI), in collaboration with each of the Public Health Service (PHS) Operating Divisions, announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         the issuance of a Final Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research. 65 FR 76647. A Draft PHS Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research was announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 21, 2000, and made available for public comment until September 21, 2000. In response to the public comment, ORI and the PHS agencies made substantial revisions to the draft policy before its issuance in final form.                     

                        Consistent with the President's January 20, 2001, Regulatory Review Plan, on behalf of PHS, ORI hereby suspends implementation of the “PHS Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research” to permit additional review both of the substance of the policy and the process for adoption. Pending completion of that                               ( print page 11033)                            review, institutions that might otherwise be subject to the RCR policy are under no obligation to implement the policy unless further public notice is issued in the                         **Federal Register**                        . Any future PHS action taken to implement the RCR policy would provide extended implementation time frames that take into consideration this suspension.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Bullman, J.D., Senior Program Analyst, Division of Education and Integrity, Office of Research Integrity, 5515 Security Lane, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 443-5300.

Chris B. Pascal, J.D.,

Director, Office of Research Integrity.

[FR Doc. 01-4226 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150-31-U
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 4 2002 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. MARIANO HERNANDEZ-MUNIZ,

Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 01-2068 & 01-2107 (D.C. No. CIV-00-777-BB/KBM)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of these appeals. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cases are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Mariano Hernandez-Muniz, a federal prisoner proceed ing pro se, requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the de nial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas petition. He appeals separately the distric t court’s ruling on the merits of his petition and its later refusal to grant him a C OA. To obtain a COA, Hernandez-Muniz must make “a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” **See** 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). This court has reviewed his request for a COA, his appellate brief , the district court’s order, as well as the entire record before us. We conclude that his petition does not meet the standard quoted above. We GRANT Hernandez-Muniz’s motion to amend his appl ication for a certificate of appealability. We DENY the request for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS these appeals. Entered for the Court
Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     SECOND  QUARTER  10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          34,425
<SECURITIES>                                        19
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,956
<INVENTORY>                                    169,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               341,588
<PP&E>                                         177,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 684,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,610
<BONDS>                                        206,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           247
<OTHER-SE>                                     326,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   684,058
<SALES>                                        547,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               547,735
<CGS>                                          289,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  289,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               165,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 75,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,369
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,092
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (5,939)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.77
        


</TABLE>