alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7031

CHARLES ROBIN WOODS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EUGENE M. NUTH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA95-3089-CCB)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 10, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Robin Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; John

Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable

cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Woods v. Nuth, No. CA-95-3089-CCB (D. Md. July 11,

1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June

23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      50,893,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  271,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,164,460
<PP&E>                                     125,845,634
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,337,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             193,293,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,406,231
<BONDS>                                     46,286,159
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,668
<OTHER-SE>                                 137,171,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               193,293,844
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,433,627
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,705,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,525,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,210,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,210,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,210,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60


</TABLE>
Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsPalatin
Technologies, Inc.,

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-33569, 333-56605,
333-64951, 333-72873, 333-84421, 333-52024, 333-54918, 333-74990, 333-100469, 333-101764,
333-104370, 333-112908, 333-128585, 333-132369, 333-140648, and 333-146392) and
registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-57079, 333-83876, 333-128854, and
333-149093) of Palatin Technologies, Inc. of our report dated September 28, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Palatin Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary as
of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended June 30, 2009, which report appears in the June 30, 2009
annual report on Form 10-K of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

/s/  KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaSeptember
28, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1926 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1926

 To amend the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 to extend and 
   authorize appropriations for the Office of National Drug Control 
                                Policy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1993

 Mr. Conyers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 to extend and 
   authorize appropriations for the Office of National Drug Control 
                                Policy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Narcotics Leadership Act 
Amendments Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY.

    Section 1009 of the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 (21 
U.S.C. 1506) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1009. TERMINATION OF OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY.

    ``This subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle, are 
repealed on September 31, 1998.''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1011 of the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 (21 
U.S.C. 1508) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1011. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``For the purpose of carrying out this subtitle, there are 
authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal 
year 1994, and for each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years, to remain 
available until expended.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### AVIVA SPORTS, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant, v. FINGERHUT DIRECT MARKETING, INC., Menard, Inc., and Kmart Corporation, Defendants, and Manley Toys, Ltd., doing business as Manley Toys, and doing business as ToyQuest, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 2013-1635, 2013-1671.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 18, 2014.

Stephen M. Lobbin, The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, CA, argued for defendant-appellant.

J. Thomas Vitt, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. With him on the brief were David Y. Trevor and Michael Wein-beck. Of counsel was Keith M. Sorge, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, PA, of Minneapolis, MN.

NEWMAN, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

*900Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         391,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,479,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,236
<INVENTORY>                                  2,530,774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,876,518
<PP&E>                                         264,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,171,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          680,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,673
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,220,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,171,962
<SALES>                                      6,580,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,580,552
<CGS>                                        4,219,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,219,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,521,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (161,029)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             136,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (293,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (293,325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (293,325)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Zohar Ziv, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatedto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;
b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based onsuch evaluation; and
c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.           /s/ Zohar Ziv   Zohar Ziv   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 11.1

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
               (In millions, except share and per share amounts )


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                              ----------------------------------
                                                                 1997        1996        1995
                                                              ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                                           <C>         <C>         <C>      
Net income ..............................................     $   147.6   $   132.5   $   107.5

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each year - basic* ...................          75.3        85.1        92.5

Weighted average number of common shares
and common stock equivalents outstanding during
each year -  diluted * ..................................          79.3        87.8        93.9
                                                              ----------  ----------  ----------

Basic earnings per  share * .............................     $     1.96  $     1.56  $     1.16
                                                              ----------  ----------  ----------
                                                              ----------  ----------  ----------
Diluted earnings per share * ............................     $     1.86  $     1.51  $     1.14
                                                              ----------  ----------  ----------
                                                              ----------  ----------  ----------
</TABLE>

*  Share and per share data have been restated to reflect the impact of a
   2-for-1 split of the Company's stock on March 4, 1998.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit. 32.2

                  CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 12 INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John J. Park, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ John J. Park
    -------------------------

    John J. Park
    Chief Financial Officer

          3/15/05
    -------------------------
    Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated and will be retained by Corporate Property Associates 12
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
|   | EXHIBIT 32.1 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

|   |
|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond I, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/Afor the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Loflin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter63 of Title 18, United States Code), that: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|   |
|--------|

| Dated: May 30, 2006. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN |   |
|----------------------|------------------|--------|

|   | David LoflinPresident |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Scott D. Kaplan,      certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pruco Life            of New Jersey Variable Contract Real Property Account; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,            to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is            made known to us by others within such entity, particularly during            the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: November 13, 2007                /s/ Scott D. Kaplan   Scott D. Kaplan   Chief Executive Officer
#### Heather CASTELLANOS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-10810.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 17, 2014.

Andrew A. Harris, Adam J. Richardson, Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., Jason D. Weisser, Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser & Zoeller, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, Glen B. Levine, Law Offices of Anidjar & Levine, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Carlton A. Bober, Nicolette N. John, Vernis & Bowling of Broward, P.A., Hollywood, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before MARCUS and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and TREADWELL,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Marc T. Treadwell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Two issues are presented on appeal from a judgment based on a jury verdict for plaintiff, in this diversity case, springing from a slip-and-fall at one of defendant’s stores. After hearing oral argument and after deliberation, we conclude that no reversible error is present.

About Defendant’s Renewed Motion for JMOL, we conclude that the record evidence—viewed in plaintiffs favor—was sufficient for the verdict1: evidence including the approximately two-foot size of the puddle of bleach, the distinctive odor of bleach, the presence of tracks not made by plaintiff or her husband through the puddle, and the proximity within about ten feet of the puddle of defendant’s employees.

About the exclusion of a purported expert’s opinion, we conclude that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion, especially given the expert’s broad lack of knowledge of the background and underpinning of the information in the DRG on which the expert relied considerably.2

AFFIRMED.

1

. Furthermore, no new trial was demanded.

2

. We do not read *State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bowling,*81 So.3d 538 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2012) to demand admission of the proposed expert testimony in this case. *Bowling*seems to decide a materially different case. For example, *Bowling*seems to be about, to a significant degree, an argument that the medical services billed did not reflect medical services actually delivered according to the treatment records and not about mainly a conflict over the reasonableness of charges for medical services, assumed to have been delivered.