alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

137392(58)

DONNA NOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137392 COA: 278727 Wayne CC: 06-612135-NO CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 18, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

K ELLY 

### , C.J., would grant reconsideration a nd, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                        February 20, 2001.                    

*Time:*                        1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                        Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 12, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-4087  Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 21.1



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



The following lists the subsidiaries of the registrant:



|                                    |  |                                
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Subsidiary / dba                    |  | State / Countryof Incorporation
|Games of Nevada, Inc.               |  | Nevada                         
|MGC, Inc.                           |  | Nevada                         
|Mikohn Gaming Australasia Pty. Ltd. |  | Australia                      
|Mikohn Europe, BV                   |  | The Netherlands                
|Mikohn Foreign Sales Corporation    |  | Barbados                       
|Mikohn International, Inc.          |  | Nevada                         
|Mikohn Nevada                       |  | Nevada                         
|Progressive Games, Inc.             |  | Delaware
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0529 IN THE MATTER OF: Y.S., Respondent and Appellant. **GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until February 14, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court January 7 2022

01/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0529
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mega Group, Inc. (the " Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned,
constituting the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of Mega
Group, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of their
knowledge:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information presented in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the issuer for the fiscal quarter then ended.


Date: July 21, 2006                                     MEGA GROUP, INC.

                                                 By:    /s/ JOHN H. BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOHN H. BROWN
                                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Date: July 21, 2006                              By:    /s/ JOYCE BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOYCE BROWN
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                       12
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*VINCENT V. CORNELIUS

*Pamela S. Nagy,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Timothy J. Sugrue,*senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 5, 2010

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 177 (AC 29662), is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Scott D. Kaplan, Chief
Executive Officer of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, containing the financial statements of Pruco Life of New Jersey
Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pruco Life of New Jersey Variable
Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.

Date: November 12, 2009



/s/ Scott D. KaplanScott D. KaplanChief Executive OfficerPruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000830320
<NAME>                        Enex Income & Retirement Fund - Series 3, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         16613
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36478
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53091
<PP&E>                                         1312406
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1159717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          36096
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     169684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205780
<SALES>                                        39715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39715
<CGS>                                          1448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   22084
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
State/Territory Name

Payment Amounts Processed

(Sent to NPS for Signature)

Alabama $364,447

Alaska $0

American Somoa $0

Arizona $219,845

Arkansas $414,800

California $12,260,409

Colorado $948,846

Connecticut $939,348

Delaware $351,510

District of Columbia $0

Federated States of Micronesia $0

Florida $841,044

Georgia $1,914,920

Guam $0

Hawaii $0

Idaho $4,008,253

Illinois $5,838,828

Indiana $3,672,886

Iowa $10,660,416

Kansas $1,695,563

Kentucky $2,719,564

Louisiana $937,066

Maine $1,876,872

Maryland $2,509,716

Massachusetts $988,817

Michigan $13,508,777

Minnesota $23,480,911

Mississippi $565,944

Missouri $3,975,091

Montana $900,346

Nebraska $1,502,521

Nevada $219,902

New Hampshire $897,689

New Jersey $425,098

New Mexico $63,039

New York $24,717,420

North Carolina $2,111,017

North Dakota $628,792

Northern Mariana Islands $0

Ohio $10,983,461

Oklahoma $934,839

Oregon $2,842,381

Pennsylvania $21,674,582

Puerto Rico $2,777,846

Rhode Island $52,126

South Carolina $802,804

South Dakota $1,773,157

Tennessee $2,394,109

Texas $3,856,056

Utah $2,430,352

Vermont $6,944,525

Virgin Islands $0

Virginia $4,738,146

Washington $4,637,403

West Virginia $445,792

Wisconsin $60,296,584

Wyoming $81,802

TOTAL PAYMENTS PROCESSED $253,825,662

2018 Margin Protection Program

Payments Processed by State ‐ As of December 10, 2018 ‐ 7:00 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6443

CLAUDE DELMUS SHAFER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD PEREZ, Warden; CHUCK KILGORE,

Disciplinary Hearing Officer; BUREAU OF

PRISONS; JOHN DOES,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-00-1173-5)

Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Delmus Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Claude Delmus Shafer appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (1994). Shafer’s case was referred to a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge

recommended that relief be denied without prejudice due, in part,

to Shafer’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies and warned

Shafer that failure to file timely objections to this

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court’s

order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Shafer

failed to object to the portion of the magistrate judge’s report

recommending dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. The district court adopted the magistrate

judge’s recommendation to dismiss with action without prejudice for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 844-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Orpiano v.

Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982) (failure to file specific

objections to particular conclusions in magistrate judge’s report,

after being warned of consequences, waives further review). Shafer

has waived appellate review by failing to object to the magistrate
3

judge’s recommendation to dismiss the action without prejudice for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm

the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 16.1

                           CHANG G. PARK, CPA, PH. D.
                         O 371 E STREET O CHULA VISTA O
                       CALIFORNIA 91910-2615O O TELEPHONE
             (858)722-5953 O FAX (858) 761-0341 O FAX (858) 764-5480
                         O E-MAIL CHANGGPARK@GMAIL.COM O
                              --------------------



May 2, 2008

Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549


Dear Madams or Sirs:

I have  read  Items  4.01  and  4.02  of Form  8-K  dated  April  28,  2008,  of
Environmental Service  Professionals,  Inc (the "Company").  I politely disagree
with the  statements  made in Item 4.01 with  respect  to  information  provided
regarding Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph.D.

Regarding  Item  4.01,  we have had many  disagreements  with the  Company as to
accounting   principles  and  audit  scope  ever  since  the  Company  purchased
subsidiaries  from Robert Johnson.  I did not agree with the Company's  argument
that their  purchases of the  subsidiaries,  which were closed on July 31, 2007,
were asset  purchase.  After reading all the relevant  documents,  I reached the
conclusion  that  they  were  stock  purchase.  When I asked  for the  financial
statements of these companies as of the closing date to review the  consolidated
financial  statements,  the Company told me that the subsidiaries  were run like
sole-proprietary  businesses with improper books and could not produce any data.
I left the Company and the third quarter  financial  statements  ended September
30, 2007 were never reviewed by me.

I found out that the revenues of these  subsidiaries  for the first seven months
were  included in the Income  Statement  of the  Company,  when I revisited  the
Company  to do the  year-end  audit.  When I asked  for the  restatement  of the
financial statements for the third quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company
refused  to do that,  saying  that  this was done at the  instruction  of me. On
November 2, 2007,  I asked for the Balance  Sheet as of the closing date and the
Income  Statement from January 1, 2007 through the closing date to check for the
accuracy  of  goodwill  amount and tax  effects  etc. I did not insist  that the
Company  include  revenues  of the  purchased  subsidiaries  for the first seven
months in the Company's financial statements ended September 30, 2007.

I have no basis to agree or disagree  with other  statements  of the  registrant
contained therein.



Yours truly,

/s/ Chang Park
---------------------------------------------
Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph.D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911583
<NAME> STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,120
<INVENTORY>                                     82,950
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,353
<PP&E>                                          76,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,720
<BONDS>                                        116,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,366
<SALES>                                        257,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               257,903
<CGS>                                          173,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,368
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 

      ( print page 11298)    
This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BSC, NIOSH), of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through February 3, 2003. 

For information, contact Kathleen Rest, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Independence Ave., SW., Room 715H, Washington, DC 20201—telephone 202/401-3735 or fax 202/260-4464. 

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                 

Dated: February 15, 2001. 

Carolyn J. Russell, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 01-4474 Filed 2-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P