alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000911503
<NAME>                                SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                     142,852,854
<SECURITIES>                                                11,184,770
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  518,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           154,556,541
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             154,556,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        3,175,280
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 151,381,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               154,556,541
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            11,414,918
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             5,889,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              5,525,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 5,525,809
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       48.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Roy Franklin ECHOLS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 13-7510.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2014.

Decided: April 21, 2014.

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General; Leah A. Darron, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appeal-ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata*191ble, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Echols has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is, deny Echols’ motion to appoint counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50017 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FRANCISCO ALONZO-MELENDEZ Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-324-1

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco AlonzoMelendez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

OLUFEMI ABIODUN OGUNYEMI,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:05-cr-00127-JAB-1)

Submitted: September 9, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Olufemi Abiodun Ogunyemi, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael 

Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Olufemi Abiodun Ogunyemi appeals the district court’s 

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. 

Ogunyemi, No. 1:05-cr-00127-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 23, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.2


                REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



CSXT Trade Receivables Master Trust
c/o Chemical Bank, as Trustee


We have  examined  the  twelve  monthly  CSXT  Trade  Receivables  Master  Trust
Certificateholders'  Distribution  Date  Statements  filed on Forms 8-K with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission during the year ended December 31, 1997 with
respect to the 5.05% Trade Receivables Participation Certificates, Series 1993-1
(the "Statements"),  prepared by CSX Transportation,  Inc. as Servicer, pursuant
to Section 5.02(a) of the Series 1993-1  Supplement dated as of October 28, 1993
to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 18, 1992, as amended
and supplemented (the  "Supplement"),  among CSX Trade Receivables  Corporation,
Seller, CSX Transportation,  Inc.,  Servicer,  and Chemical Bank,  Trustee.  Our
examination  was made in accordance  with standards  established by the American
Institute  of Certified  Public  Accountants  and,  accordingly,  included  such
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.

In our opinion, the Statements referred to above present the information, in all
material respects, in compliance with Section 5.02(a) of the Supplement, and the
servicing has been conducted in compliance  with the terms and conditions as set
forth in Article  III,  Article IV and Section  8.08 of the Amended and Restated
Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of October 27, 1993,  among CSX Trade
Receivables  Corporation,  Seller,  CSX  Transportation,   Inc.,  Servicer,  and
Chemical Bank, Trustee.

We have also compared the mathematical  calculations of each amount set forth in
the Statements referred to above with the Servicer's computer reports which were
the source of such  amounts and found them to be in  agreement, in all  material
respects.

This report is intended solely for the use of CSX Trade Receivables Corporation,
Seller, CSX Transportation,  Inc.,  Servicer,  and Chemical Bank,  Trustee,  and
should not be used for any other purpose.



                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
                                          -----------------------
                                          Ernst & Young LLP


March 12, 1998
Richmond, Virginia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,503,103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  581,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      90,605,525
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,208,624)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,353,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,348,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,274
<COMMON>                                         1,610
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,126,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,353,427
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,920,712
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,871,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,878,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,230,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,230,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (117,824)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,112,612
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 27, 2016

t0120

Order 

Clerk

January 27, 2016

152104

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152104

COA: 326999 

Wayne CC: 14-010291-FH

CALVIN A. AUSTIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|    | EXHIBIT 32.1  |    |
|--------------|--------------------|--------------|

| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond I, Inc. (the      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Loflin,      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company.  |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 20, 2008.  | DIAMOND I, INC.  |    |
|---------------------------|-----------------------|--------------|

| By:  | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN  |    |
|-----------|------------------------|--------------|

|    | David Loflin, President and Chief Executive Officer  |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

|    |
|--------------|

| A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906      has been provided to Diamond I, Inc. and will be retained by Diamond I,      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff      upon request.  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice announces a meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Task Force Mitten Crab Control Committee. The meeting topics are identified in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# DATES:

The Mitten Crab Control Committee will meet from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Tuesday, March 6, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

The Mitten Crab Control Committee Meeting will be held in the Pavilion Room at the Radisson Hotel, 500 Leisure Lane, Sacramento, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sharon Gross, Executive Secretary, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, at 703-358-2308 or by e-mail at sharon_gross@fws.gov or Kim Webb, Mitten Crab Control Committee Chair, at 209-946-6400.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance Specifies Task Force Mitten Crab Control Committee. The ANS Task Force was established by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990.

Topics to be covered during the Mitten Crab Control Committee meeting include: a review of the life history of the mitten crab, a description of the California invasion, a review of the draft management plan, an update of the current status, and a discussion of Committee actions to further develop a comprehensive management plan.

Minutes of the meeting will be maintained by the Executive Secretary, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Suite 810, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203-1622, and will be available for public inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Friday.

Dated: February 14, 2001.

Cathleen I. Short,

Co-Chair, Acquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Assistance Director—Fisheries and Habitat Restoration.

[FR Doc. 01-4359  Filed 2-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-1208-000]

Take notice that on February 8, 2001, Duke Energy Moapa, LLC (Duke Moapa), tendered for filing pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act its proposed FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.

Duke Moapa seeks authority to sell energy and capacity, as well as ancillary services, at market-based rates, together with certain waivers and preapprovals. Duke Moapa also seeks authority to sell, assign, or transfer transmission rights that it may acquire in the course of its marketing activities.

Duke Moapa seeks and effective date sixty (60) days from the date of filing for its proposed rate schedules.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before March 1, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-4067 Filed 2-16-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 7, 2010

d0331 

# Order

April 7, 2010

139832

JESUBEN ENGELHARDT and LORI ENGELHARDT, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 139832 COA: 292143 Macomb CC: 2 007-004652-NMST. JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM-DETROITMACOMB CAMPUS, d/b/a ST. JOHN MACOMB HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellants,

and

RAJESH C. BHAGAT, M.D. and RAJESH C. BHAGAT, M.D., P.C., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 9, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/      Christopher L. Kolb                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher L. Kolb,      President and principal financial officer  |   |
| November 13,      2009                                                    |   |