alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2222 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2222

To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to allow foreign trade zones to be 
 established where a regional commission involving more than one State 
                    will coordinate zone activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 1993

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself and Mr. Machtley) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to allow foreign trade zones to be 
 established where a regional commission involving more than one State 
                    will coordinate zone activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly 
known as the Foreign Trade Zones Act (19 U.S.C. 81b)), is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Special Rule for Applications by Regional Commissions.--
            ``(1) Notwithstanding subsection (b), additional zones may 
        be authorized in the case of an application by a regional 
        commission if the requirements of paragraph (2) are met.
            ``(2) A regional commission may apply for and be granted 
        the privilege of establishing and maintaining a foreign-trade 
        zone which is located in 2 or more States, if--
                    ``(A) a plan to operate such zone is approved by 
                the State legislature of each State within such zone,
                    ``(B) the overall commercial interests of the 
                United States will be served by the establishment of 
                such zone,
                    ``(C) the economic conditions of the region in 
                which the zone is to be located justify the 
                establishment of the zone, and
                    ``(D) the zone will be operated in accordance with 
                section 14.''.
    (b) Definition.--Section 1 of such Act (19 U.S.C. 81a) is amended 
by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j) and inserting after 
subsection (h) the following new subsection:
    ``(i) The term `regional commission' means a commission authorized 
by the legislature of 2 or more States to engage in regional planning 
efforts for the purpose of establishing and coordinating the activities 
of 1 or more foreign trade zones in such States.''.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.9.5   Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association Change in
                 Control Agreement Renewal and Extension Acknowledgment between
                 Quaker City Federal Savings and Loan Association and Kathryn M.
                 Hennigan dated July 1, 1999.



               QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
                          CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
                     RENEWAL AND EXTENSION ACKNOWLEDGMENT




Name of Participant:         Kathryn M. Hennigan
                    -----------------------------------------



The undersigned participant does hereby acknowledge that, at their regularly
scheduled meeting  on June 17, 1999, the Board of Directors of Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association acted to renew and extend the Quaker City
Federal Savings and Loan Association Change in Control Agreement with the
undersigned participant to a full twenty-four (24) month term, until June 30,
2001.


Dated this ___1st___ day of ____July____, A.D., ______1999_______.



                                          QUAKER CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
                                          ASSOCIATION


  /s/ Kathryn M. Hennigan                 By:  /s/ Frederic R. McGill
---------------------------                  --------------------------
Participant                               President
#### Ramon Cruz REYES and Ofelia Robles Diaz, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73778.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2011.

Sanjay Sobti, Esquire, Corona, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Marshall Tamor Golding, I, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Cruz Reyes and Ofelia Robles Diaz, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Reyes v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 592, 595 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion on the ground that they failed to comply with the requirements set forth in *Matter of Lozada,*19 I. & N. Dec. 637, 639 (BIA 1988), because petitioners did not include any evidence that they had informed the attorneys of the allegations against them, and the alleged ineffective assistance is not plain on the face of the record. *See Reyes,*358 F.3d at 594, 597-99.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion on the ground *32that the new evidence of their youngest daughter’s health problems was untimely and did not fall within any exception to the time restrictions. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         390,508
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                88,757
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,221,505
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      4,395,707
<ALLOWANCE>                                     66,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,309,525
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,076,325
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,560,106
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             82,391
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          100,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<OTHER-SE>                                     490,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,309,525
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                109,532
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               19,700
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               129,232
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              42,491
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,371
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           67,370
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      999
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 825
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 54,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,413
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.30
<LOANS-NON>                                     49,519
<LOANS-PAST>                                     8,953
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,154
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                68,085
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,561
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,661
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               66,184
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            66,184
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.16  







Oral Independent
Contactor Agreement 



Concurrent with the appointment of
Daniel Meyer as President, Treasurer and Secretary of Sky Petroleum, Inc. on December 20,
2004, Sky Petroleum, Inc. and Daniel Meyer orally agreed to the terms of engagement under
which Daniel Meyer would provide services on an independent contactor basis to serve as
President, Treasurer and Secretary of Sky Petroleum, Inc. for a consulting fee of $5,000
per month. The agreement was approved by resolution of the board of directors of Sky
Petroleum, Inc. on December 20, 2004. 



On October 1, 2005, Sky Petroleum,
Inc. and Daniel Meyer orally agreed to increase the monthly compensation under which
Daniel Meyer would provide services on an independent contactor basis to serve as
President, Treasurer and Secretary of Sky Petroleum, Inc. for to $7,500 per month. 



On May 30, 2006, Mr. Meyer resigned
as the President, Treasurer and Secretary of Sky Petroleum, Inc. and this oral agreement
was terminated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGES
    AND     OF THE COMPANIES 10-K FOR FISCAL YEAR END AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         300,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        168,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,066
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,384
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,534
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,534
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09


</TABLE>
941 A.2d 1257

#### SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 290, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 4, 2008.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED. The matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court to remand to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for consideration of *Westmoreland Intermediate Unit*# *7 v. Westmoreland Intermediate Unit*# *7 Classroom Assistants Educational Support Personnel Association, PSEA/NEA,*939 A.2d 855 (2007).
#### JULIO CENTENO COLON *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*David B. Rozwaski,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

Decided April 14, 2010

The petitioner Julio Centeno Colon’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 117 Conn. App. 904 (AC 29312), is denied.
663 S.E.2d 482

#### In the Matter of Ivan N. WALTERS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 27, 2008.

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.1 Respon*597dent has filed a return in which he consents to being placed on interim suspension.

Pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, respondent’s license to practice law in this state is hereby suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Costa M. Pleicones, J.

FOR THE COURT

1

. On June 18, 2008, respondent pled guilty in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina to an information charging misprison of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS  
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000829987
<NAME>                        Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         13,102
<SECURITIES>                                   30,248
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (500)
<INVENTORY>                                    23,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,287
<PP&E>                                         75,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (33,875)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,881
<BONDS>                                        4,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       254
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,054
<SALES>                                        26,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,290
<CGS>                                          19,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                887
<INCOME-TAX>                                   350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            537
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned officers hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Productivity  Technologies  Corp. for the year ended June
30, 2003 as to which this  Certification  is an exhibit fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C.  78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the  information  contained in such Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Productivity Technologies Corp..

Date: January 20, 2004

/s/ Jesse A. Levine
------------------------------------------
Jesse A. Levine,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The National Bank of Indianapolis
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Debra L. Ross, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Debra L. Ross
--------------------------------
Debra L. Ross
Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2007



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and not for any other purpose, and is subject to the knowledge
standard contained in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
EXHIBIT 15.1



February 10, 1998

The Board of Directors

Iwerks Entertainment, Inc.




We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-77816) pertaining to the Employees' incentive
stock options and other stock option and warrant agreements of Iwerks
Entertainment, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 1998 relating to the
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Iwerks
Entertainment, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 1997.

                                     

                           /S/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joaquin LOPEZ-CASAS, Appellant.

No. 10-2931.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 6, 2011.

Filed: Jan. 11, 2011.

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Joaquin Lopez-Casas appeals the 151-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed after he entered a conditional guilty plea to possessing cocaine hydrochloride with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

We find no error in the denial of the motion to suppress. The evidence at the suppression hearing showed that Lopez-Casas consented to each part of the search, and there was no evidence of coercion. *See United States v. Luken,*560 F.3d 741, 744 (8th Cir.2009) (consensual searches do not violate the Fourth Amendment); *United States v. Siwek,*453 F.3d 1079, 1084 (8th Cir.2006) (consent to a search is voluntary unless it was a product of duress or coercion); *United States v. Hernandez,*281 F.3d 746, 748 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review). We also find that the district court did not clearly err in denying a minor-role reduction because it was undisputed that Lopez-Casas agreed to drive money from New York to California and return with drugs. *See United States v. Adamson,*608 F.3d 1049, 1053-54 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review; defendant’s role in offense is measured in comparison to other participants; no role reduction for defendant who transported large amounts of drugs and money).

Furthermore, we conclude that the district court committed no procedural error in sentencing Lopez-Casas and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (in reviewing sentence, appellate court first ensures that district court committed no significant procedural error and then considers substantive reasonableness of sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard; if sentence is within Guidelines range, appellate court may apply presumption of reasonableness); *United States v. Haack,*
      *73403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir.2005) (describing abuse of discretion).

Having reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

. The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
WYNONA DAVIS CARPENTER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4230

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael Flowers , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for App ellant; Wynona Davis Carpenter, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.