alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 13, 1996

        Avondale Industries, Inc.
        Post Office Box 50280
        New Orleans, Louisiana  70150

        We have made a review, in accordance  with  standards  established by
        the  American  Institute  of  Certified  Public Accountants,  of  the
        unaudited interim financial information of  Avondale Industries, Inc.
        and subsidiaries for the periods ended September  30,  1996 and 1995,
        as indicated in our report dated October 30, 1996; because we did not
        perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

        We are aware that our report referred to above, which is  included in
        your  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
        30, 1996 is incorporated by  reference  in Registration Statement No.
        33-31984 on Forms S-8 and S-3.

        We also are aware that the aforementioned  report,  pursuant  to Rule
        436(C) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part  of
        the  Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or
        a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of
        Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



        DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                      14,394,331
<SECURITIES>                                12,810,809
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,969,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,047,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,941,354
<PP&E>                                       3,596,051
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,929,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,034,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,498,250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,580
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,894,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,034,405
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,445,084
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,287,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,152,036
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               385,856
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (678,586)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,176,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,176,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,176,089)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1,323
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,176
<PP&E>                                         855,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                 26,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 845,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          71,663
<BONDS>                                        198,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       247
<OTHER-SE>                                     574,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   845,245
<SALES>                                        105,091
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,309
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  53,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                43,526
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            43,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   43,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.09


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 20, 2012

h0613 

# Order

June 20, 2012

144356

- 7

RONALD W. LECH II,

Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant/Appellee,

v SC: 144356

- 7

COA: 296489; 297196

HUNTMORE ESTATES CONDOMINIUM Livingston CC: 08

- 024045

- CH

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant/Counter

- Plaintiff/Appellee,

and

JACOBSON ORE CREEK LAND

DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. and SCOTT R.

JACOBSON, d/b/a S.R. JACOBSON LAND

DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,

Defendants

- Appellants.

________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in

lie u of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals as it

applies to the Jacobson defendants and REINSTATE the Livingston Circuit Court’s order

granting the Jacobson defendants’ motion for summary disposition. The Court of

Appea ls erred in finding that the plaintiff could assert the rights of LANS Development

Corporation because a covenant against encumbrances is personal and does not run with

the land. Pease v Warner , 153 Mich 140, 151

- 152 (1908); McMurtry v Smith , 320 Mich

304 , 308 (1948). Moreover, the orders entered by the Livingston Circuit Court in the

interpleader action, Case No. 05

- 021757

- CH, did not confer upon the plaintiff the right to

assert the rights of LANS Development Corporation. With respect to Count IV of th e

plaintiff’s complaint, MCL 559.184a was not applicable because, under the unique

circumstances of this case, the plaintiff was not a “prospective purchaser.”
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Income Growth Management, Inc., a California corporation
and the General Partner of Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited
partnership, does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 of
Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited partnership, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Income Growth Partners, Ltd. X, a California limited
partnership.

Date: August 16, 2004                /s/ David W. Maurer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     David W. Maurer, Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 16, 2004                /s/ Timothy C. Maurer
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Timothy C. Maurer, Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 99.04

                                                              Company's Form 8-K
                                                              August 7, 1996

                                                              Page 2

          In July 1996, a complaint seeking equitable relief was filed in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by the U.S. Department
of Justice, naming twenty-four major brokerage firms, including the Company's
subsidiary Smith Barney Inc., as defendants. A proposed settlement has been
agreed to by the parties, subject to approval of the court. Pursuant to this
settlement, the defendants, without admitting any liability, would agree not to
engage in certain practices relating to the quoting of Nasdaq securities and
would further agree to implement a program to ensure compliance with federal
antitrust laws and with the terms of the settlement. No monetary fines or
penalties are imposed as part of the settlement.
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 99.05

                                                              Company's Form 8-K
                                                              March 6, 1997

                                                              Page 2

          In December 1996, a complaint seeking unspecified monetary damages was
filed by Orange County, California against numerous brokerage firms, including
Smith Barney Inc., in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California. Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that defendants recommended
and sold to plaintiff unsuitable securities. The Company believes it has
meritorious defenses to this action and intends to contest the allegations. The
case, entitled County of Orange et al. v. Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. et al., has
been stayed by agreement of the parties.
947 A.2d 714

#### SCHUYLKILL TOWNSHIP, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, Home Builders Association of Chester and Delaware Counties, The Basile Corporation And SHC, Inc., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 5, 2008.

*587
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of May 2008, the Petition lor Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

> Whether Section 508 of the Pennsylvania Construction Code Act, 35 P.S. § 7210.503(j)(2), requires a municipality to prove that there are unusual local circumstances or conditions atypical of other municipalities that would justify an ordinance which departs from the construction standards mandated by the Uniform Construction Code?

> Whether the Commonwealth Court, in establishing a new standard on an issue of first impression should have provided the Township with an opportunity to satisfy that standard?
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2425 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2425

To amend title 18, United States Code, to double the enhanced penalties 
for carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or 
                        drug trafficking crime.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1993

  Mr. Franks of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to double the enhanced penalties 
for carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or 
                        drug trafficking crime.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Penalty Enhancement Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. DOUBLING OF ENHANCED PENALTIES FOR CARRYING A FIREARM DURING 
              AND IN RELATION TO A CRIME OF VIOLENCE OR DRUG 
              TRAFFICKING CRIME.

    Section 924(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``five'' and inserting ``10'';
            (2) by striking ``ten'' and inserting ``20'';
            (3) by striking ``thirty'' and inserting ``60''; and
            (4) by striking ``twenty'' and inserting ``40''.

                                 <all>
```
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
                               (Dollars in millions)

The Company's consolidated ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends for each of the periods indicated are set forth below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Year Ended
                                                               --------------------------------
                                                               Dec. 31,    Dec. 31,    Dec. 31,
                                                                 1998        1997        1996
                                                               --------    --------    --------
<S>                                                            <C>         <C>         <C>     
Income before income taxes                                     $  241.9    $  242.0    $  224.5

Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends:
    Interest expense on deposits                                  465.5       472.7       525.7

    Interest expense on long-term debt                             13.9         6.4          --

    Interest expense on guaranteed preferred  beneficial
       interest in Company's junior subordinated debentures        18.3        10.7          --

    Appropriate portion (1/3) of rent expense                       4.2         3.5         3.0

    Preferred stock dividend requirements                            --         0.4         0.3
                                                               --------    --------    --------
              Total combined fixed charges and
                 preferred stock dividends                     $  501.9    $  493.7    $  529.0
                                                               ========    ========    ========
Earnings before income taxes and combined fixed
   charges and preferred stock dividends                       $  743.8    $  735.7    $  753.5
                                                               ========    ========    ========
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
   preferred stock dividends (including interest expense
   on deposits)                                                    1.48 x      1.49 x      1.42 x
                                                               ==========  ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3345

___________

Marvel Jones, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Internal Revenue Service; Rodney J. *

Strickland, Chief, Customer Service *

Branch III; Dennis Parizek, Chief, *

Customer Service Center Examination *

Branch; Mr. Corbridge, Unknown *

Position at Internal Revenue Service; *

Richard M. Creamer, Commissioner; *

Known and Unknown Defendants, *

*

Appellees, *

* Appeal from the United States

---------------------------------- * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Marvel Jones, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Nebraska Department of Correctional *

Services; Harold W. Clarke, Director; *

Michael Kenney, Warden; George *

Green, Facility CEO; Inga L. *
1

The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

-2-

Hookstra; Known and Unknown *

Defendants, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 28, 2003

 Filed: April 1, 2003

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Nebraska inmate Marvel Jones appeals the District Court’s1

 Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 12(b) dismissal of, and its subsequent adverse grant of summary

judgment in, his related 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuits. Having carefully reviewed the

record de novo, we affirm for the reasons explained in the District Court’s wellreasoned and thorough orders. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40582 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE FLORES

- P EDRAZA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 25

- 1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Flores

- Pedraza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Flores

- Pedraza h a s not filed a r esponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 10, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40582 Document: 00513073638 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2015No. 14

- 40582

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to with draw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40582 Document: 00513073638 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2015
**Exhibit 99.1**
Chief Executive Officer’s Sec. 302 Certification
     I, Mario Valcarce, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F/A ofEnersis;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Enersis as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;
Date: February 19, 2004       By: /s/ Mario Valcarce        Name: Mario Valcarce    Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 10-7310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Decided: Jan. 20, 2011.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Hairston,*No. 3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1, 2010 WL 3521591 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We deny Hairston’s “Motion for the Court to Issue an Order.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### THOMAS J. CARROLL AND VALERIE CARROLL, APPELLANTS, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Submitted March 7, 1995

Decided March 16, 1995.

Before Judges PRESSLER, LANDAU and NEWMAN.

*Thomas J. Carroll,*appellant, pro se.

*Deborah T. Poñtz,*Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent *(Joseph L. Yannotti,*Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; *Joseph Fogelson,*Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

*178PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lasser in his oral opinion of April 8, 1994. *See also, Chin v. Director, Division of Taxation,*14 *N.J.Tax*304 (Tax 1994).

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                         814,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  769,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,606
<INVENTORY>                                    700,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,329,040
<PP&E>                                       1,768,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                 563,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,409,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,321,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          8
<COMMON>                                         1,123
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,224,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,409,451
<SALES>                                      1,567,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,567,624
<CGS>                                          605,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,099,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                39,418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (113,379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (113,379)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)

</TABLE>