alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VII

Private Calendar No. 8

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2411

[Report No. 103–579]

For the relief of Leteane Clement Monatsi.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1994

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JUNE 30, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Leteane Clement Monatsi.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR LETEANE

4 CLEMENT MONATSI.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Leteane Clement Monatsi shall be

6 classified as a child under section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Im7 migration and Nationality Act for purposes of approval

8 of a relative visa petition filed under section 204 of such
2

•HR 2411 RH

1 Act by his adoptive parent and the filing of an application

2 for an immigrant visa or adjustment of status.

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Leteane Clement

4 Monatsi enters the United States before the filing deadline

5 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have

6 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi7 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245

8 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of

9 the enactment of this Act.

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the pe12 tition and the application for issuance of an immigrant

13 visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed

14 with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the

15 enactment of this Act.

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Leteane Clement Monatsi, the Secretary of State

19 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the

20 current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level

21 of family-sponsored immigrants under section

22 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

23 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

24 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

25 parents, brothers, and sisters of Leteane Clement Monatsi
3

•HR 2411 RH

1 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any

2 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and

3 Nationality Act.

Private Calendar No. 

8

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2411

[Report No. 103–579]

A BILL

For the relief of Leteane Clement Monatsi.

JUNE 30, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying financial statements of IAC Capital Trust for the period January
20, 1998 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001048922
<NAME> IAC CAPITAL TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    150,000
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,005
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,722
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVONDALE
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          66,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,052
<PP&E>                                         258,491
<DEPRECIATION>                               (133,454)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,268
<BONDS>                                         51,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,956
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,525
<SALES>                                        444,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,522
<CGS>                                          386,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  386,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,691
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,591
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT

         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT ("Second Amendment") dated
February 24, 1998, is between University Associates Limited, L.L.P., a Florida
limited partnership by BBM Management, L.L.C. ("Landlord") and Anda Generics,
lnc. ("Tenant").

                                    RECITALS

A.       Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease ("Lease"), on April
         24, 1986 for that certain Space #21 in that shopping center known as
         University Park Plaza.

B.       Landlord and Tenant now desire to amend the Lease Agreement as provided
         in this Second Amendment.

                                    AGREEMENT

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual covenants of
the parties hereto, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties
hereto mutually covenant and agree as follows:

1.       Landlord herein grants Tenant the right and privilege of extending the
         Lease Agreement for three (3) additional six (6) month options, the
         first of which shall commence November 15, 1998.

2.       Tenant acknowledges that in the event Tenant should exercise the right
         to extend the Lease for either of the additional option periods, that
         all terms and conditions of said options shall be in accordance with
         Rider to Lease including but not limited to (a) Notice to Landlord of
         Tenant's intention to exercise its right to extend the lease term and
         (b) The Minimum Base Rent shall adjust in accordance with the Consumer
         Price Index as set forth in the Rider to Lease and such rent adjustment
         shall occur at the beginning of each option period and shall increase
         the Minimum Base Rent by amount of not less than one and one half
         (1.5%) percent nor greater than three and one-half (3.5%) percent above
         the then current base rent.

3.       Tenant acknowledges and reaffirms that the rent is due and payable on
         the first day of each calendar month.

4.       All other terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement shall remain in
         full force and effect.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease on the
respective dates indicated below.

WITNESSES:                                  LANDLORD:  University Associates
                                            Limited, L.L.P., a Florida limited
                                            partnership by BBM Management L.L.C.

/S/                                         By: /S/
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
                                                Manager

/S/BELINDA PEREZ                            Dated:FEBRUARY 24, 1998
--------------------------------
WITNESSES:                                  TENANT:  Anda Generics, Inc.

/S/ALLISON A. LICHTER                       By: /S/SCOTT LODIN
--------------------------------                --------------------------------

                                        2
#### DONLIN SPORTSWEAR, INC. v. AMALGAMATED CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, Southeastern Regional Clothing Board, Emma Dameron, Geneva Sneed, Cookie Long, Woody Biggs, Eilene Fultz, Danny Fultz, Jeff Widner, Bill Singleton.

Civ. No. 3-79-247.

United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, N. D.

June 20, 1979.

*628Philip J. Lawson, Morristown, Tenn., James P. Cobb, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.

George E. Barrett, Charles R. Ray, Nashville, Tenn., Arthur Goldberg, Gen. Counsel, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union of America, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to remand the case to the Chancery Court of Claiborne County, Tennessee, on the ground that the complaint states a cause of action arising under state law rather than under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Extended oral argument was heard.

Defendants claim that the complaint asserts secondary activity prohibited under § 303 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 187(a) and (b), and that since such secondary activity is alleged the federal court has original jurisdiction of the case.

Plaintiff contends that the complaint states only state causes of action, namely, an action for tortious interference with business relationships and breach of the peace. The Court is of the opinion that the complaint alleges state causes of action as distinguished from a federal cause of action and for that reason the case must be remanded to state court.

The picketing in this case took place at the primary site of the dispute and was directed against the primary employer and for that reason it was primary activity as distinguished from secondary activity. *National Woodwork Manufacturers Association v. NLRB,*386 U.S. 612, 87 S.Ct. 1250, 18 L.Ed.2d 357 (1967). The secondary effects of the picketing mentioned in the complaint are only incidental to plaintiff’s cause of action.

Even if the complaint could possibly be construed as alleging a federal claim in addition to the independent state grounds, plaintiff would still be permitted to rely solely on its state causes of action. *See WECA Programs Inc. v. Economy Co.,*462 F.Supp. 462 (W.D.Okl., 1978).

The Court notes that plaintiff’s state causes of action are in no sense inconsistent with the policies of federal labor law. The importance and validity of state regulation of traditional areas of state concern, even in labor disputes, has recently been re-emphasized by the Supreme Court. *Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters,*436 U.S. 180, 98 S.Ct. 1745, 56 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978).

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that the motion to remand be, and the same hereby is, sustained.

Order Accordingly.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Krupp Insured Plus- II Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Reese, ChiefAccounting Officer of Krupp Plus Corporation, a General Partner of thePartnership, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership as of December 31, 2002 (the last date of theperiod covered by the Report).

 

 
|   / s / Alan Reese   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Alan Reese,               |
| Chief  Accounting Officer |

 

----
2009-1327.

#### State v. Wolff.

Mahoning App. No. 07 MA 166, 2009-Ohio-2897.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MIRON 2319, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3074

[February 28, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18-

001510.

John M. Bernazzoli, Hollywood, and Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., 

Tampa, for appellant.

Kendra S. Breeden, City Attorney’s Office, Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The City of Hollywood administers water to utility customers like Miron 

2139, LLC. The City notified Miron that it owed money for water delivered 

but not billed due to a defective water meter. Miron sought to enjoin the 

City from collecting payment and now appeals from summary judgment 

denying its request. We affirm with one exception.

The 2014 amendment to section 51.075(B) of the Hollywood Code of 

Ordinances states:

In case the meter has been found to be defective or has ceased 

to register, the amount of usage to be billed for the period the 

meter was not functioning properly shall be determined by 

taking the average monthly usage for the previous 12 months. 

The City can then bill for past unbilled usage for a period up 

to 60 months.

As we explained in Hollywood Park Apartments South, LLC v. City of 

Hollywood, 361 So. 3d 356, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023), “the previous 12 
2

months necessarily refers to the period immediately preceding the unbilled 

usage period for which the city sought additional payment due to the meter 

malfunction.”

In this case, the meter failed in June 2011. For purposes of calculating 

the average monthly usage, the previous twelve months is June 2010 to 

May 2011. Here, the circuit court did not calculate the monthly usage 

during that period. As such, we reverse and remand to allow the circuit 

court to determine Miron’s average monthly usage for the period from June 

2010 to May 2011.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CONNER, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2452 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2452

Relating to the tariff treatment of certain agglomerated cork products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1993

 Mr. Kleczka introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Relating to the tariff treatment of certain agglomerated cork products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN AGGLOMERATED CORK PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--The article description for subheading 4504.10.10 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended to 
read as follows: ``Vulcanized blocks, plates, cylinders, sheets, slabs, 
and other shapes wholly of ground or pulverized cork''.
    (b) Cut or Molded Agglomerated Cork.--Chapter 45 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new subheading, with the article 
description having the same degree of indentation as the article 
description in subheading 4504.10.50:

      

       ``  4504.90.10    Agglomerated cork, not further                     Free (A,CA,      22 cents/kg        
                          advanced than cut or molded                        E,IL)                            ''
                          into blocks, plates, cylinders,                                                      .
                          sheets, slabs, rods, sticks,                                                          
                          strips, and other shapes.......  5.5 cents/kg                                         

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    (a) In General.--The amendments made by section 1 apply with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Retroactive Provision.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law to the contrary, upon 
a request filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th 
day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or 
withdrawal from warehouse for consumption of goods to which any 
amendment made by section 1 applies and that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1988; and
            (2) before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
        the Act;
and with respect to which there would have been no duty or a lower duty 
if such amendment had applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be 
liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had 
occurred on such 15th day.

                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000908 15-DEC-2016 01:56 PM
<PAGE>

                 EXHIBIT 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Ultimate Electronics, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2000, except
for Note 5, as to which the date is March 31, 2000, included in the 2000
Annual Report to Stockholders of Ultimate Electronics, Inc.

Our  audits  also  included  the  financial   statement   schedule  of  Ultimate
Electronics,  Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the  responsibility of
the Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion,  the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-94636, No. 33-92256, No. 33-92258 and No.
333-43049) pertaining to the SoundTrack 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, the
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock Option Plan and
the Equity Incentive Plan, respectively, of Ultimate Electronics, Inc. of our
report dated March 8, 2000, except for Note 5, as to which the date is March
31, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
of Ultimate Electronics, Inc. included or incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2000.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado
May 1, 2000
<PAGE>   1






                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              AVONDALE INCORPORATED
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Fiscal Years Ended
                                            1993      1994      1995      1996      1997
                                           -----     -----     -----     -----     -----
<S>                                        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>  
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense                        $ 2.1     $ 6.5     $14.3     $18.5     $26.2
   Discount and expenses on sale of
      accounts receivable                     --        --        --       3.7       6.6
   Amortization of debt issuance costs        --        --        --        .9       1.1
                                           -----     -----     -----     -----     -----
     Fixed Charges                         $ 2.1     $ 6.5     $14.3     $23.1     $33.9
                                           -----     -----     -----     -----     -----

Earnings
   Pretax income before                    $74.2     $22.6     $34.0     $22.7     $37.9
       extraordinary item
   Fixed charges                             2.1       6.5      14.3      23.1      33.9
                                           -----     -----     -----     -----     -----
       Earnings                            $76.3     $29.1     $48.3     $45.8     $71.8
                                           -----     -----     -----     -----     -----

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          37.2x      4.5x      3.4x      2.0x      2.1x
</TABLE>