alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 11017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-4203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2232-413 South Carolina]


Duke Energy Corporation; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

February 14, 2001.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA analyzes the environmental impacts of Duke Energy Corporation's 
(Duke) application to grant a non-project use of project land to City 
of York (York) to install a pipeline and intake, for raw water withdraw 
in Lake Wylie, a reservoir for the Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric 
Project. Duke's proposed grant would also allow York to withdraw up to 
6 million gallons of water per day from Lake Wylie. The Catawba-Wateree 
Project is on the Catawba River in Lancaster, York, and Fairfield 
Counties, South Carolina, and Gaston, Lincoln, and Burke Counties, 
North Carolina.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. In the EA, Commission staff 
conclude that approving Duke's application to grant the use would not 
constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality 
of the human environment. Copies of the EA can be viewed on the web at 
www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm. Call (202) 208-2222 for assistance. 
Copies are also available for inspection and reproduction at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., 
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-4203 Filed 2-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for
the periods indicated.
  /s/ Cameron R. NelsonCameron R. NelsonVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

      I, Joyce Brown, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mega Group,
Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c.) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

      a.) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

      6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: July 21, 2006                              By:    /s/ JOYCE BROWN
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        JOYCE BROWN
                                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-23849, 33-87988 and 33-87990) pertaining to the 1996 Non-
Employee Directors' Stock Plan, the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
1993 Equity Incentive Plan of Pacific Crest Capital, Inc. of our report dated
February 1, 1996, with respect to the 1995 and 1994 consolidated financial
statements of Pacific Crest Capital, Inc. included in its Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                                                                

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 21, 1997
|   | EXHIBIT 32.2 |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT      OF 2002 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond I, Inc. (the      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Loflin,      Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18      U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 15, 2008. | DIAMOND I, INC. |   |
|------------------------|-----------------|--------|

| By: | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN |   |
|-----|------------------|--------|

|   | David Loflin, Acting Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906      has been provided to Diamond I, Inc. and will be retained by Diamond I,      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff      upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel CORNEJO-RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Manuel Rodriguez-Cornejo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10665.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 8, 2014.*

Filed April 10, 2014.

Christina Marie Cabanillas, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jill Elayne Thorpe, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Manuel Cornejo-Rodríguez, pro se.

Before: BENAVIDES,** TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Fortunato P. Benavides, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Manuel Cornejo-Rodríguez (“Rodriguez”) appeals from the judgment revoking his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             1,631
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            7
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5,631
<PP&E>                                             4,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    13,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,706
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              34
<OTHER-SE>                                         6,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      13,387
<SALES>                                            4,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   4,972
<CGS>                                              3,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      5,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    82
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3-5
of the Company's Form 10-Q for the year to date, and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000829649
<NAME> CONTOUR MEDICAL, INC.
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         400,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,346,119        
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,368,222         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,483,769
<PP&E>                                       1,823,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,251,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,364,841         
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    875,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,853,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,251,585
<SALES>                                     12,912,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,912,530
<CGS>                                        9,073,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,073,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,141,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                697,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                   265,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   431,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Benjamin Don Eddington, Appellant

No. 06-21-00065-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 402nd District Court of 

Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 23,747-

2018). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Benjamin Don Eddington, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Quentin JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, VDOC, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7442.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2010.

Quentin Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quentin Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### IN RE DIAMOND J.

*Michael S. Taylor,*in support of the petition.

*Stephen G. Vitelli,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided July 14, 2010

The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn. App. 392 (AC 31426), is denied.
Steve Campbell Memorandum Concerning Termination


    EXHIBIT
      10.4

    


    MEMORANDUM
      OF AGREEMENT CONCERNING

    TERMINATION
      OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP

    


    THIS
      MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CONCERNING TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP
(“Memo”)
      ") is made and entered into as of this 14th
      day of
      August, 2006, by and between FRICTION
      PRODUCTS CO., an
      Ohio
      corporation (“Friction”), and STEVEN J.
      CAMPBELL,
      an
      individual (hereinafter referred to as “Campbell”).

    


    R
      E C I T A L S :

    


    A. Prior
      to
      the date of this Memo, Campbell was employed by Friction as its President,
      pursuant to the terms of an Agreement of Employment, Confidentiality and
      Non-Competition dated January 27, 2000, as amended by a First Amendment to
      Agreement of Employment, Confidentiality and Non-Competition dated October
      5,
      2004 (collectively, the “Friction Employment Agreement”). Friction is a
      subsidiary of Hawk Corporation (‘Hawk”). Pursuant to the Friction Employment
      Agreement, Campbell also served as President of Tex Racing Enterprises, Inc.
      (“Tex”).

    


    B. As
      a
      result of changes in the organization of Hawk’s businesses, Campbell now desires
      to become President of Hawk
      Precision Components Group, Inc. (“HPCG”),
      and to enter into an employment agreement with HPCG (the “HPCG Employment
      Agreement”). HPCG is also a subsidiary of Hawk. 

    


    C. Friction
      is willing to allow Campbell to leave Friction and become President of
      HBCG.

    


    ACCORDINGLY,
      the
      parties agree as follows:

    


    1. Termination
      of Employment Relationship.
      The
      parties understand and agree that the employment relationship between Campbell
      and Friction, and between Campbell and Tex, shall be deemed to be terminated
      as
      of the date of this Agreement.

    


    2. Continuation
      of Provisions of Employment Agreement.
      Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, above, it is agreed that (i)
      the
      terms of paragraphs 4 through 15 of the Friction Employment Agreement shall
      remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms;
      and
      (ii) the performance of Campbell’s duties for HPCG pursuant to the HPCG
      Employment Agreement shall not constitute a violation of Campbell’s duties to
      Friction pursuant to paragraph 4 of the Friction Employment
      Agreement.

    
      IN
      WITNESS
      WHEREOF,
      the
      undersigned have hereunto set their hands on the date first hereinabove
      mentioned.

    


    FRICTION
      PRODUCTS CO.

    


    


    By: /s/
      Ronald E. Weinberg    

    Its: Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer  

    


    


    /s/
      Steven J. Campbell    

    STEVEN
      J. CAMPBELL ("Employee")

    


    


    


    


    
 

    
 

    59
Albuquerque Service Center Travel Help Desk

Instructions for Requesting Subsistence Reimbursement 

for Forest Service Evacuees

August 2021

USDA Forest Service employees who were evacuated are eligible for reimbursement of subsistence 

payments while in an evacuated status. The Forest Service Chief Financial Officer Budget & Finance has 

established processes and support for Forest Service employees to get their reimbursement as quickly as 

possible. We realize you may not have access to office equipment so cell phone photos of receipts can be 

emailed along with the additional information we need to process your reimbursement. B&F staff will 

prepare your reimbursement forms for you to help facilitate this process. 

Additional assistance is available from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) if your area 

is under a disaster declaration. You can register with FEMA at www.DisasterAssistance.gov.

The following costs are reimbursable to evacuated employees:

• Transportation: Travel expenses for the employee and dependents will be determined, in 

accordance with the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR), from the evacuated area to the agency 

designated safe haven and for their return to the previously evacuated area, as authorized. 

• Lodging-plus: For the period of evacuation, employees are eligible for actual amount of lodging

(if paid by employees) plus a set allowance for meals and expenses (per diem) for employee and 

dependents. Dependent: As defined under the Office of Personnel Management regulations a 

dependent is a relative of the employee residing with the employee and dependent on the 

employee for support. 

Please email all documentation to the ETS2 inbox: SM.FS.ets2@usda.gov

Include the additional information in the email:

• Name of employee

• Names and ages of dependents

• Contact Phone Number 

• Evacuation start date

• Evacuation end date

If the employee does not have an ETS2 profile, please fill out an FS6500-214 and submit along with the 

documentation. Link to form: https://usdagcc.sharepoint.com/sites/fs-cfo-bfp/tech/SitePages/Forms.aspx

For the convenience of Forest Service personnel, the Albuquerque Service Center Chief Financial Officer

Budget & Finance Travel Help Desk will be open on Saturday (8/72021) and Sunday (8/8/2021) from 

1000 to 1400 Pacific Daylight Time to assist evacuees with their subsistence requests. 

ASC CFO Travel Help Desk 1-877-372-7248, Option #3